Jigsaw Complete Essential Daily Packets - P.M. [Discontinued] by Jigsaw Health

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Aging skin. Although there is interest in using oral or topical acai to prevent aging skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of acai for this purpose.
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral acai is beneficial for improving athletic performance. Details: Preliminary clinical research in amateur cyclists shows that consuming 400 grams of pasteurized acai pulp daily for 15 days prevents oxidative damage and decreases levels of blood lactate during exercise by 28% when compared with placebo. Consuming acai pulp also seems to increase anaerobic threshold intensity, but does not improve maximum workload or measures of exertion, when compared to baseline (102860).
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). Although there is interest in using oral acai for ED, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of acai for this condition.
• Hypercholesterolemia. Although there is interest in using oral acai for hypercholesterolemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of acai for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. Although there is interest in using oral acai for metabolic syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of acai for this condition.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral black seed is beneficial for improving metabolic indices in overweight individuals. Details: In overweight individuals, preliminary clinical research shows that consuming 100 mg of acai pulp (Sambazon Acai Smoothie Pack, Sambazon Inc.) twice daily for one month reduces fasting glucose and total cholesterol levels when compared with baseline. However, no effect was seen on levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or blood pressure (17731). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Osteoarthritis. Although there is interest in using oral acai for osteoarthritis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of acai for this condition.
• Tinnitus. It is unclear if oral acai is beneficial for chronic tinnitus. Details: A small clinical study in adults with unilateral or bilateral chronic tinnitus, with either normal hearing or mild hearing loss, shows that taking dried acai pulp extract 100 mg daily for 3 months decreases tinnitus discomfort when compared with baseline (107846). However, the validity of this finding is limited by the lack of statistical comparison to the placebo group, which reported a numerically similar improvement in tinnitus discomfort. More evidence is needed to rate acai for these uses.

(Read more about ACAI)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Diabetic neuropathy. Oral or intravenous alpha-lipoic acid 600-1800 mg daily seems to improve symptoms of peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes. Its benefits in patients with cardiac autonomic neuropathy are unclear. Details: Several clinical studies show that taking alpha-lipoic acid, either alone or in combination with gamma-lipoic acid, superoxide dismutase, or vitamin B12, seems to improve neuropathic sensory symptoms such as burning, pain, numbness, and prickling of the feet and legs, as well as objective measures such as ratings of neurological deficit and disability. Symptom improvement seems to occur within 3 to 5 weeks of oral or intravenous dosing (3540,3541,3557,3868,10148,12106,20473,20475,20478,20480)(20481,20484,20488,90447,103333,111429,111703). A meta-analysis of 10 clinical studies in adults with diabetic polyneuropathy shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600-1800 mg daily for 3 weeks to 2 years reduces the incidence, severity, and frequency of sensory symptoms and improves measures of impairment and neurological disability but does not improve vibration perception threshold or measures of nerve conduction when compared with placebo (111703). However, another meta-analysis of 6 studies in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes, that includes some of the same studies, shows that giving alpha-lipoic acid 600-1800 mg daily orally or intravenously for 3-8 weeks does not improve neuropathic pain when compared with placebo (112937). Orally, alpha-lipoic acid 600-1800 mg daily in one to three divided doses has been used (3540,3541,3868,20475,20478,103333,111429). A specific combination product containing alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg and superoxide dismutase 140 IU (ALA600 SOD, Alfa Wassermann) has also been used (20488). Intravenously, alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg and 1200 mg daily have been used (3540,3541,3557,10148,20480,20481,20484). In one study, a specific product (Thiotacid, Eva Pharma) was used (103333). However, some preliminary clinical research shows that lower doses of alpha-lipoic acid are ineffective for improving nerve conduction velocity or subjective complaints of neuropathy (3869,20479,20482,20486,20487). Also, although there is some preliminary evidence that taking alpha-lipoic acid improves nerve function indices, such as Valsalva maneuver, Ewing's tests, or electrocardiogram measurements in patients with a specific type of diabetic neuropathy called cardiac autonomic neuropathy, taking alpha-lipoic acid orally does not improve clinical symptoms (3542,20483,20485,96223,107892).
• Hyperlipidemia. Oral alpha-lipoic acid seems to reduce levels of total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in certain populations. However, it is unclear whether alpha-lipoic acid is clinically beneficial in patients with hyperlipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of 11 clinical trials shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 300-1200 mg daily for up to 16 weeks decreases total cholesterol by 10 mg/dL and LDL cholesterol by 9 mg/dL, but does not seem to improve high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol or triglycerides, when compared with placebo (100709). In addition, in a large group of generally healthy adults, taking alpha-lipoic acid 800-1200 mg for 4 years reduces levels of total and LDL cholesterol, as well as triglycerides, when compared with baseline. The 1200 mg daily dose was more effective than the 400 mg daily dose (104650). A meta-analysis of clinical research in various patient populations shows that taking oral alpha-lipoic acid 300-1200 mg daily for 2-16 weeks decreases levels of total cholesterol by 11 mg/dL, LDL cholesterol by 11 mg/dL, and triglycerides by 31 md/dL when compared with placebo. It is unclear whether dose or treatment duration affect these outcomes (107885). These findings are limited by the high heterogeneity of the included studies and patient populations. One clinical study in adults with gestational diabetes, most of whom had elevated cholesterol levels at baseline, shows that taking oral alpha-lipoic acid (Puritan's Pride) 100 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces triglycerides, but does not improve levels of total, HDL, or LDL cholesterol, when compared with placebo (107890). The validity of this study is limited due to short duration of treatment. While many patients in these studies had elevated lipid levels at baseline, none of the studies specifically evaluated patients with hyperlipidemia. Thus, the benefits of alpha-lipoic acid in these patients is unclear.
• Obesity. Most research shows that oral alpha-lipoic acid seems to improve weight loss by a small amount. Details: While individual clinical studies show mixed results (21674,97630,100710,103327,103334), meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking alpha-lipoic acid 300-1800 mg daily for 2-48 weeks can modestly reduce body weight by 0.7-2.3 kg and body mass index (BMI) by up to 0.5 kg/m2 when compared with placebo in overweight individuals or patients with obesity. The magnitude of these improvements are not dependent on the dose or duration of treatment (96231,96232,103332,111294). While these improvements are statistically significant, they may not be clinically meaningful. In addition, a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in adults with obesity shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 300-600 mg orally daily for 8-10 weeks improves some markers of insulin resistance, but not blood pressure or cholesterol levels (111294). Taking alpha-lipoic acid might also reduce body weight in overweight children or children with obesity. In adolescents aged 10-17 years, clinical research shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 300 mg twice daily for 3 months reduces body weight by 3.2 kg when compared with placebo. However, there was no effect on blood lipids or fasting blood glucose (103330). Also, a small clinical study in children 8-16 years of age shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid (Tiobec 800, Laborest) 800 mg daily for 12 weeks does not improve body weight, BMI, blood pressure, blood lipids, glycemic control, insulin resistance, or endothelial function when compared with placebo (100708). However, this study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference in many of these outcomes.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Alcohol-related liver disease. Oral alpha-lipoic acid does not seem to improve liver function in patients with alcohol-related liver disease. Details: Taking alpha-lipoic acid orally 300 mg daily for up to 6 months does not appear to improve liver function or reduce liver damage when compared with placebo in patients with alcohol-related liver disease (3880,21678).
• Altitude sickness. Oral alpha-lipoic acid, in combination with vitamins C and E, does not seem to be beneficial for altitude sickness prevention or treatment. Details: Clinical research in healthy volunteers ascending to 5200 meters shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg in combination with vitamin C 1 gram and vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) 400 IU in four divided doses daily, beginning on the day of travel to high altitude and continuing for 2 weeks thereafter, does not prevent the occurrence nor decrease the severity of altitude sickness when compared with placebo (20499).
• Contrast induced nephropathy. Oral alpha-lipoic acid does not seem to prevent nephropathy after undergoing coronary angiography. Details: In diabetic patients at low risk for contrast induced nephropathy, alpha-lipoic acid (Thioactacid 600 mg RH, MEDA Manufacturing GmbH) 600 mg taken 30 minutes prior to and 24 and 48 hours after undergoing coronary angiography, with or without standard hydration therapy, does not reduce the risk of contrast induced nephropathy when compared with standard hydration therapy (90442). In addition, treatment with alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg orally every 8 hours beginning the afternoon prior to angiography and continuing for 2 days does not attenuate the maximum increase in serum creatinine or reduce the incidence of contrast induced nephropathy in most patients when compared with standard hydration therapy alone (90446).
• Diabetes. Oral or intravenous alpha-lipoic acid does not seem to be beneficial for glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Details: Although some conflicting findings from individual studies exist, the overall evidence does not support the use of oral or intravenous alpha-lipoic acid for improving glycemic control or insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes (3545,3874,3875,3876,20490,20493,20494,20495,20496,90443)(90445,110118,111305). A meta-analysis of 16 small clinical studies in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 200-1200 mg daily for up to 52 weeks leads to slight improvements in glycemic control and body weight, but these improvements are not clinically significant. When compared with placebo, alpha-lipoic acid reduced fasting blood glucose by 6 mg/dL, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.17%, body weight by 0.7 kg, and body mass index (BMI) by 1.1 kg/m2. While triglyceride levels were reduced by 19 mg/dL, improvements in other lipids levels and blood pressure were lacking (110118). A specific alpha-lipoic acid product administered orally or intravenously in some of these studies was Thioctacid (Asta Medica) (3874,3875,3876). Alpha-lipoic acid has also been evaluated in patients with gestational diabetes or type 1 diabetes. A small clinical study in adults with gestational diabetes shows the taking alpha-lipoic acid (Puritan's Pride) 100 mg daily for 8 weeks improves fasting blood glucose levels and insulin sensitivity but does not affect HbA1C when compared with placebo (107890). The validity of this study is limited due to its short duration, which was likely inadequate to detect a change in HbA1c. Also, one small clinical study in adolescent patients with type 1 diabetes who show signs of early stage diabetic cardiomyopathy shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 300 mg twice daily for 4 months, in combination with insulin therapy, improves left ventricular systolic and diastolic function (90443).
• Diabetic retinopathy. Oral alpha-lipoic acid does not seem to prevent macular edema in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Details: Some research shows that taking oral alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily for 24 months does not improve the incidence of clinically significant macular edema when compared with placebo in patients with mild to moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (20491).
• HIV/AIDS-related dementia. Oral alpha-lipoic acid does not seem to improve cognitive impairment related to this condition. Details: Clinical research shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily, alone or along with selegiline (Deprenyl), for 10 weeks may worsen HIV-associated cognitive impairment and does not affect mood or functional status when compared with placebo in patients with confirmed HIV infection and evidence of cognitive impairment (1556).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for age-related cognitive decline. Details: Preliminary clinical research in elderly adults shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg orally daily for 12 weeks does not improve cognitive function scores when compared with baseline (111303). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for AMD. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid (Pure Encapsulations) 1200 mg daily for 18 months does not improve visual acuity or reduce the rate of atrophy when compared with placebo in patients with advanced AMD (103335). It is unclear if alpha-lipoic acid would be beneficial in patients with less severe symptoms of AMD.
• Age-related testosterone deficiency. Oral alpha-lipoic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in males with overweight or obesity, mild erectile dysfunction, and normal to low androgen levels shows that taking a combination product containing alpha-lipoic acid 800 mg, myo-inositol, folic acid, and apple (Sinopol Forte, Laborest) increases testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and measures of erectile dysfunction but not follicle-stimulating hormone or sperm parameters when compared to baseline (111674). The validity of these findings is limited by the small sample size and lack of a comparator group, and it is unclear if these effects are due to alpha-lipoic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Aging skin. Topical alpha-lipoic acid may be beneficial for aging skin. Details: A small clinical study shows that applying a cream containing alpha-lipoic acid 5% to the face twice daily for 12 weeks reduces the fine lines and roughness associated with aging of facial skin when compared with a control cream (12021).
• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for this condition. Details: Some preliminary clinical research shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg once daily in combination with standard cholinesterase inhibitors may slow cognitive decline when compared with cholinesterase inhibitors alone in some patients with Alzheimer disease (20500,90437). However, higher-quality clinical research shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600-900 mg daily for up to 2 years, in combination with vitamin C and vitamin E, does not affect cognitive function when compared with placebo in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease (19206,20501).
• Amanita mushroom poisoning. Evidence on the use of intravenous alpha-lipoic acid for amanita mushroom poisoning is limited to anecdotal reports. Details: Intravenous alpha-lipoic acid has been used in combination with other treatments for poisoning from amanita mushroom ingestion. Its use is controversial. Reports are anecdotal, and experimental evidence does not support its effectiveness. Some researchers recommend against its use (105,1548,1549,3871,3879).
• Anthracycline cardiotoxicity. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is effective for the prevention of anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Details: A small clinical study in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily for 6 months does not improve ejection fraction but does decrease levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), a marker of ventricular hypertrophy, when compared with placebo (110112).
• Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is effective for the prevention or treatment of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Details: A very small, open-label study in patients with schizophrenia shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily along with conventional antipsychotic therapy for 12 weeks reduces prolactin levels by 51% when compared to baseline (110116). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Antipsychotic-induced metabolic side effects. Small clinical studies suggest that oral alpha-lipoic acid does not seem to improve antipsychotic-induced metabolic side effects in patients with schizophrenia. Details: A very small, open-label study in patients with schizophrenia shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily along with conventional antipsychotic therapy for 12 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose levels by around 17 mg/dL but actually increases glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.14% when compared to baseline. No improvements in body weight or lipid levels were reported (110116). Another small clinical study in patients with schizophrenia stabilized on antipsychotic therapy for at least 1 year shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 100 mg daily for 16 weeks does not improve body mass index (BMI) when compared with placebo (110115).
• Aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia. Oral alpha-lipoic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer and aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia shows that taking a specific combination product (Opera, Gamfarma Srl) containing alpha-lipoic acid 240 mg, Boswellia serrata 40 mg, methylsulfonylmethane 200 mg, and bromelain 20 mg once daily for 6 months reduces arthralgia intensity when compared to baseline, with around 22% of patients having complete symptom resolution at the end of the study (109570). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Atrial fibrillation. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for atrial fibrillation. Details: Clinical research shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily for 12 months does not reduce the recurrence of atrial fibrillation when compared with placebo in patients who underwent a catheter ablation procedure. However, there was a decrease in the need for antiarrhythmic drugs in patients receiving alpha-lipoic acid (97628).
• Back pain. Oral alpha-lipoic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: An observational study in adults with chronic lower back pain and sciatica suggests that taking a combination of alpha-lipoic acid 800 mg, palmitoylethanolamide 600 mg, and myrrh 200 mg daily for 30 days, along with periradicular infiltrations of oxygen-ozone, is associated with resolution of pain in 17% more patients when compared with periradicular steroid infiltrations at 60 days (111308). However, it is unclear if this effect is due to alpha-lipoic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Beta-thalassemia. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for reducing iron accumulation in beta-thalassemia major. Details: A small, crossover study in patients with beta-thalassemia major who are receiving iron chelation therapy shows that adding oral alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg before breakfast or dinner for 8 weeks reduces levels of serum ferritin when compared with placebo (107888). Serum ferritin was reduced by 104 ng/mL and 38 ng/mL in the treatment and placebo groups, respectively. The validity of this finding is limited due to the small, exploratory nature of the study.
• Bipolar disorder. Oral alpha-lipoic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking acetyl-L-carnitine 1000 mg plus alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg up to three times daily for 12 weeks does not improve depression when compared with placebo in patients with type I or type II bipolar disorder (90441).
• Burning mouth syndrome. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for burning mouth syndrome. Details: A meta-analysis of nine small, low-quality clinical trials in patients with burning mouth syndrome shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 400-800 mg daily for up to 2 months does not reduce pain intensity when compared with placebo or active controls such as multivitamins, Biotene mouth rinse, capsaicin, laser therapy, clonazepam, or pregabalin. However, in an analysis of three placebo-controlled studies, alpha-lipoic acid increased the likelihood of any burning mouth syndrome-related symptom improvement by 92% when compared with placebo (110111). Individual studies, most of which were included in the analysis, show conflicting results overall (20474,21661,21662,21663,21664,21665,21666,111427). One small clinical trial shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily improves symptoms of burning mouth syndrome in patients who had never previously been treated with anxiolytics or antidepressants, but not in those who had received these prior treatments (21668). This suggests that alpha-lipoic acid may improve symptoms of burning mouth syndrome resulting from stress, but not from depression or drug-induced hyposalivation.
• Cancer. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-lipoic acid for preventing or treating cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alpha-lipoic acid for this condition.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although there is interest in using oral alpha-lipoic acid for preventing or treating CVD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alpha-lipoic acid for this condition.
• Carpal tunnel syndrome. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for carpal tunnel syndrome, either before or after surgery. Details: In patients with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome, preliminary clinical research shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily for 60 days reduces pain by a moderate amount when compared with not taking alpha-lipoic acid, but with no effect on functionality (103328). In patients with neuropathic pain due to carpal tunnel syndrome, giving alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg intravenously daily for 30 days, then 600 mg orally daily for 60 days, decreases pain on a visual analog scale, and improves functionality when compared with oral alpha-lipoic acid alone, or no treatment (112938). Alpha-lipoic acid has also been studied in combination with other ingredients. One study shows that taking a combination of alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg and gamma-linolenic acid 360 mg for 90 days improves functional scores and subjective symptom scores when compared to baseline (21653). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Another clinical study in adults with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome shows that taking a combination product containing alpha-lipoic acid, acetyl-L-carnitine, phosphatidylserine, turmeric, and vitamins C, E, B1, B2, B6, and B12 twice daily for 60 days reduces symptom severity and pain but does not improve measures of hand and wrist function when compared with control (111702). The validity of these effects is limited by a lack of blinding. The study may also be inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. Additionally, it is unclear if the effects are due to alpha-lipoic acid, other ingredients, or the combination. Alpha-lipoic acid has also been evaluated in patients who have undergone carpal tunnel release surgery. Taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily for 40 days starting immediately after surgery does not improve the rate of nerve recovery when compared with placebo, although it seems to reduce the occurrence of post-operative pillar pain, which is a common complication of carpal tunnel release surgery (96233).
• Cataracts. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-lipoic acid for cataracts, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alpha-lipoic acid for this condition.
• Cervical dysplasia. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial in patients with cervical dysplasia. Details: A small clinical study in patients with low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily for 3 months reduces the proportion of patients with intraepithelial neoplasia by 95% when compared with placebo (110113).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. There is conflicting evidence regarding the effectiveness of oral alpha-lipoic acid for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Details: One clinical study shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg three times daily for 24 weeks during treatment with cisplatin or oxaliplatin does not affect the symptoms or severity of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy when compared with placebo (90439). However, another small clinical study in patients with breast cancer receiving paclitaxel shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily for 6 months reduces the severity of peripheral neuropathy when compared with placebo (110112). The reason for this disparate finding is unclear, but it may be due to differences in chemotherapy regimens. Alpha-lipoic acid has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical study shows that taking a specific product (Opera, Gamfarma s.r.l.) containing alpha-lipoic acid 240 mg, methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) 200 mg, Boswellia serrata 40 mg, and bromelain 20 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces overall pain when compared to baseline in adults with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (96449). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group. Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg orally once daily and ipidacrine 20 mg orally three times daily throughout 6 paclitaxel-based chemotherapy cycles improves sensory nerve action potential parameters when compared with control (111292). It is unclear if these effects are due to alpha-lipoic acid, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there is interest in using oral alpha-lipoic acid for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alpha-lipoic acid for this condition.
• Chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for CKD. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with stage 2 or 3 CKD related to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 1.6 grams daily for 6 months has modest benefits on biochemical markers and cognitive tests when compared to control. Taking alpha-lipoic acid reduces serum glucose, insulin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and uric acid levels, and improves insulin resistance and flow-mediated dilation and cognitive test results. However, there was no effect on intima media thickness or the ankle brachial index (101867).
• Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Oral alpha-lipoic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients undergoing elective CABG surgery shows that taking a combination of alpha-lipoic acid 100 mg, coenzyme Q10 100 mg, magnesium orotate 400 mg, and omega-3 fatty acids 300 mg three times daily, with selenium 200 mcg once daily, for up to 2 months prior and 1 month after surgery, decreases plasma troponin levels and reduces the average postoperative hospital stay by 1.2 days when compared with placebo (21651). It is unclear if this effect is due to alpha-lipoic acid, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial in patients with persistent loss of the sense of smell after COVID-19 infection. Details: In adults with sense of smell loss persisting for more than 3 months after COVID-19 infection, adding alpha-lipoic acid 300 mg twice daily orally for 12 weeks to olfactory training reduces the incidence of anosmia, and improves the olfactory threshold, the sense of smell measured on a visual analog scale, and the smell identification score by a similar amount to placebo (112935).
• Diabetic nephropathy. When used in combination with certain conventional medications, intravenous or oral alpha-lipoic acid may improve some measures of albuminuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that intravenous alpha-lipoic acid (YantaiZhichu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) 450 mg plus intravenous alprostadil 20 mcg once daily for 14 days reduces urinary albumin excretion rate by 23% and cystatin C levels by 19% when compared with alprostadil alone (96221). Patients treated with alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg intravenously plus valsartan 80 mg orally once daily for 14 days showed a 25% lower urinary albumin excretion rate and a 27% and 31% lower serum level of beta2-microglobulin and cystatin C, respectively, when compared with patients treated with valsartan alone (101866). A meta-analysis of clinical research in adults with diabetic nephropathy shows that taking oral alpha-lipoic acid 300 mg, 450 mg, or 600 mg daily in combination with oral valsartan 80 mg daily for 14 days reduces urinary albumin excretion rate, as well as levels of urinary albumin and serum beta 2-microglobulin, when compared with either valsartan or alpha-lipoic acid alone (107891). These findings are limited by the high heterogeneity of the included studies and the presence of potential publication bias. Additionally, the long-term benefits of alpha-lipoic acid are unclear. Another meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with diabetes shows that taking oral alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily in conjunction with other medications (e.g. antihypertensives, vitamin B6) for 3-18 months reduces levels of urine albumin, but does not improve urinary albumin excretion rate, when compared with placebo. Notably, alpha-lipoic acid alone did not affect outcomes (107886). The validity of these findings is limited by the high heterogeneity of the included studies; additionally, the quality of evidence was considered low to moderate.
• Dry eye. It is unclear if topical alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial in patients with dry eye. Details: A small clinical study in patients with diabetes and dry eye symptoms shows that application of an eye drop containing alpha-lipoic acid 0.1% and hydroxy-propyl-methylcellulose (HPMC) 0.3% three times daily for 2 months does not improve subjective or objective measures of dry eye symptoms when compared with HPMC alone (110119).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for dysmenorrhea. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg orally daily, with or without mefenamic acid 250 mg daily, for 5 days starting before menstruation reduces pain associated with moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhea by approximately 24% and 44%, respectively, when compared to baseline (101871). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). It is unclear if oral or intravenous alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for ED. Details: Preliminary clinical research in males with diabetes and ED shows that intravenous alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg with alprostadil 10 mcg once daily for 14 days improves the quality and frequency of erection in 95% of patients, compared with only 81% of those taking tadalafil 5 mg orally daily (96224). It is not clear if this improvement is due to alpha-lipoic acid, alprostadil, or the combination. Another very small study in males with mild ED, overweight or obesity, and normal to low androgen levels shows that taking a combination product containing alpha-lipoic acid 800 mg, myo-inositol, folic acid, and apple (Sinopol Forte, Laborest) improves measures of erectile dysfunction when compared to baseline (111674). The validity of these finding is limited by the small sample size and the lack of a comparator group, and it is unclear if these effects are due to alpha-lipoic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Fibromyalgia. It is unclear if intravenous alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for fibromyalgia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid (SiSU Vita Health) 600-1800 mg daily for 4 weeks does not reduce pain intensity when compared with placebo in patients with fibromyalgia (104655). Alpha lipoic acid has also been studied as a combination therapy for fibromyalgia. Preliminary clinical research in adults with fibromyalgia shows that taking a combination of alpha-lipoic acid and pregabalin for 6 weeks does not improve pain or depression scores when compared with either product alone (111428). However, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Glaucoma. Oral alpha-lipoic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with open-angle glaucoma shows that taking a combination product containing alpha-lipoic acid 100 mg, omega-3 fatty acids 2240 mg, vitamin C 180 mg, vitamin E 27.9 mg, lutein 10 mg, zeaxanthin 2 mg, zinc 15 mg, copper 1 mg, and taurine 150 mg (NuaDHA Vision, Nua Biological) orally daily for 6 months does not improve intraocular pressure when compared with baseline (111310).
• Heart failure. Oral alpha-lipoic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with heart failure participating in a handgrip exercise shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid, vitamin E, and vitamin C reduces mean arterial pressure by about 6 mmHg and reduces vascular resistance by about 12% when compared with placebo (19219). The first dose consisted of vitamin E 200 IU, vitamin C 500 mg, and alpha-lipoic acid 300 mg. The subsequent dose consisted of vitamin E 400 IU, vitamin C 500 mg, and alpha-lipoic acid 300 mg (19219). It is unclear if these effects are due to alpha-lipoic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Hemorrhoids. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for hemorrhoids. Details: A preliminary open-label clinical trial shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 200 mg daily for 12 weeks decreases anal pain while sitting, pain at defecation, itching, and bleeding when compared with no treatment in patients with second- and third-degree hemorrhoids (100707). The validity of these results is limited by a lack of blinding and placebo control.
• Herniated disc. Oral alpha-lipoic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small observational study in adults with acute lumbosacral radiculopathy secondary to lumbar disc herniation shows that taking a combination supplement containing alpha-lipoic acid 404 mg, myrrh, and palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) (Tiobec Dol, Uriach Italy Srl) twice daily for 4 weeks, along with steroids and as needed opioids, reduces pain and disability and improves physical but not mental health as it pertains to quality of life when compared with steroids and as needed opioids alone (111711). However, it is unclear if these effects are due to alpha-lipoic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• HIV/AIDS. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for patients with HIV/AIDS who are unresponsive to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Details: A small clinical study in patients who were unresponsive to HAART shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid (Alpha Lipoic Sustain 300, Jarrow Formulas) 300 mg three times daily for 6 months improves lymphocyte proliferation and whole blood glutathione levels when compared with placebo. However, there was no change in HIV RNA levels or CD4 count (21655).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for hypertension. Details: Clinical research in a small number of patients with mild (stage I) hypertension shows that adding alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily to quinapril 40 mg daily for 8 weeks does not significantly decrease blood pressure when compared with quinapril alone (21656). A meta-analysis of 11 clinical trials shows that alpha-lipoic acid lowers systolic blood pressure by a mean of about 5 mmHg, and diastolic blood pressure by a mean of about 3 mmHg, but there is significant heterogeneity between the studies. The small decrease in blood pressure is also only seen with doses of alpha-lipoic acid below 800 mg daily when given for 12 weeks or less (112934).
• Hypertriglyceridemia. Clinical studies suggest that oral alpha-lipoic acid does not reduce triglyceride levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, however it might be beneficial in certain populations. Details: In overweight adults with elevated triglycerides, taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily for 24 weeks does not reduce triglyceride levels when compared with placebo (103327). In addition, a meta-analysis of 11 clinical trials in patients with or without hypertriglyceridemia at baseline shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 300-1200 mg daily for up to 16 weeks does not improve triglyceride levels when compared with placebo (100709). However, one clinical study in adults with gestational diabetes, most of whom had elevated triglyceride levels at baseline, shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid (Puritan's Pride) 100 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces triglyceride levels by 30 mg/dL, compared with an increase of 5 mg/dL in those taking placebo, a difference that was statistically significant (107890). The validity of this study is limited due to short duration of treatment.
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral or intravenous alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for prediabetes. Details: A small clinical study in patients with prediabetes shows that intravenous alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily for 2 weeks decreases postprandial plasma glucose, steady state plasma insulin, cholesterol, and fatty acid levels and increases insulin sensitivity when compared with placebo (21657). In a large group of generally healthy adults, taking alpha-lipoic acid 800-1200 mg for 4 years reduces levels of fasting plasma glucose when compared with baseline. The 1200 mg daily dose was more effective than the 400 mg daily dose (104650). While some patients in this study had prediabetes or impaired fasting glucose at baseline, the study did not specifically evaluate patients with prediabetes.
• Infertility. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-lipoic acid to increase the chance of pregnancy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alpha-lipoic acid for infertility.
• Interstitial cystitis. Oral alpha-lipoic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In individuals with vulval pain associated with painful bladder syndrome, clinical research shows that taking a specific product containing alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg, docosahexaenoic acid 250 mg, eicosapentaenoic acid 16.67 mg, vitamin E 12 mg, vitamin D 5 mg, and magnesium 56.25 mg (ALAnerv Age; Alfa Wassermann) daily in combination with amitriptyline up to 30 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces pelvic pain between 15% to 49% more than amitriptyline alone. Also, use of the combination supplement more than doubled the number of patients with an improvement in pain during intercourse (97629). It is unclear if the benefit is associated with alpha-lipoic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-lipoic acid for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alpha-lipoic acid for this condition.
• Male infertility. Most small clinical studies suggest that oral alpha-lipoic acid might improve sperm characteristics in males with infertility. However, it is unclear whether alpha-lipoic acid improves pregnancy or live birth rates in these individuals. Details: A meta-analysis of three small clinical studies in males with infertility shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily for 80-90 days improves sperm motility and increases sperm concentration and semen volume when compared with placebo (110108). More recent clinical trials in males with idiopathic asthenozoospermia or history of recurrent pregnancy loss shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg orally daily for 80-90 days improves sperm motility, sperm concentration, and semen volume and reduces sperm DNA damage when compared with placebo (110110,111425). However, a small clinical study in males with infertility due to high levels of sperm DNA damage shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily for 80 days does not improve pregnancy rate, sperm motility, sperm concentration, semen volume, or other measures of sperm health when compared with placebo (110109). Alpha-lipoic acid has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical study in males with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) shows that taking one tablet daily of a specific product (Fertiplus SOD, Idi-Pharma) containing alpha-lipoic acid, superoxide dismutase, glutathione, and other nutrients 30 days prior to IVF procedures improves the pregnancy rate from 9% of all embryo transfers pre-treatment to 45% and reduces the rate of miscarriage when compared to baseline (97627). It is unclear if the benefit is associated with alpha-lipoic acid, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial in patients with metabolic syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with metabolic syndrome shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg orally daily for 12 weeks modestly improved serum triglyceride levels, but not serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL), or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo (111307). However, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial in patients with migraine headaches. Details: A small clinical study in females with episodic migraines shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 300 mg twice daily for 12 weeks reduces migraine frequency by around 2 attacks per month and improves migraine severity, but not the duration of migraine pain, when compared with placebo (110117). Another small clinical study in adults with migraines shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 400 mg twice daily for 6 months reduces migraine frequency by at least 50% in 69% of patients and reduces the need for migraine treatment by 56% when compared to baseline, although the validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group (96229). In contrast, one small clinical study in adults with migraine headaches shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily for 3 months does not improve monthly migraine attack frequency when compared with placebo (21660). The reasons for these disparate findings are unclear. Alpha-lipoic acid has also been evaluated in adolescents for migraine prophylaxis. A small open-label study in adolescents aged 10-19 years with a history of migraine shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 300 mg with flunarizine 5 mg as prophylaxis daily for 12 weeks reduces the frequency of migraine attacks and reduces monthly migraine headache days by 9 days, but does not reduce migraine severity or measures of disability when compared with flunarizine alone. For every 3 patients treated with alpha-lipoic acid and flunarizine over flunarizine alone, 1 additional patient had a 50% or greater reduction in migraine frequency (111706). The validity of these effects is limited by a lack of blinding.
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid prevents a loss of muscle strength after exercise. Details: In athletes, a small clinical trial shows that taking a single dose of alpha-lipoic acid 150 mg (Athenion GmbH) after an intensive load protocol does not prevent loss of leg strength approximately 24 hours later when compared with placebo. However, taking the same dose for 2 days, followed by 300 mg daily during a 6-day training protocol, results in the maintenance of leg strength, compared with a loss in those taking placebo (104652).
• Neck pain. Oral alpha-lipoic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a combination of alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg plus superoxide dismutase 140 IU once daily for 2 months, along with physiotherapy, reduces chronic neck pain in approximately 50% more patients when compared with physiotherapy alone (90440).
• Neuropathic pain. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial in patients with neuropathic pain. Details: In patients with peripheral neuropathies, taking alpha-lipoic acid orally, up to 1800 mg daily for 6 weeks, is less effective for reducing pain intensity scores and improving quality of life than pregabalin, taken orally in doses up to 450 mg daily (112940). A nonblinded clinical study in patients with refractory chronic lumbosacral radicular pain shows that taking alpha lipoic acid orally, 600 mg three times daily for 3 weeks followed by 600 mg daily for 2 weeks, in addition to a single, pulsed radiofrequency treatment to the dorsal ganglion, improves pain severity and disability scores at 6 months when compared with pulsed radiofrequency treatment alone. A pain score of less than 4 is achieved at 12 weeks in about 80% of patients taking alpha lipoic acid, compared with about 65% of patients without alpha-lipoic acid. (107895).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: Small clinical studies in adults with NAFLD and obesity show that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg orally twice daily for 8-12 weeks does not improve liver health markers, such as liver function test levels or liver steatosis, cholesterol levels, body weight, or visceral fat when compared with placebo or control (104660,100710,111304). However, these clinical trials show that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg orally twice daily for 8-12 weeks may provide small improvements in interleukin-6 levels, adiponectin levels, and insulin resistance (104660,100710). However, these studies may have been inadequately powered to detect differences in some of these outcomes.
• Orthostatic hypotension. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for orthostatic hypotension. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 430-788 mg orally daily for a mean of 2.3 years attenuates changes in blood pressure upon standing when compared with baseline in some patients with chronic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension or orthostatic intolerance (101868).
• Pain (chronic). It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for various chronic pain conditions. Details: A clinical study in patients with untreated, mild to moderate idiopathic pain (i.e. neuropathic pain, joint pain, and muscle pain with unknown etiology) shows that taking oral alpha-lipoic acid 400 mg once or twice daily for 2 months may improve pain severity when compared with baseline, with greater effects observed with daily doses of 800 mg (107887). Although the study enrolled a control group, a statistical comparison between groups was not conducted, limiting the validity of this finding. Additionally, sub-analyses evaluating outcomes based on type of chronic pain were not conducted.
• Periodontitis. Oral alpha-lipoic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with moderate or advanced periodontitis shows that taking a supplement containing alpha-lipoic acid 25 mg, coenzyme Q10, cranberry extract, grapeseed extract, selenium, vitamin C, vitamin E, and zinc twice daily for 8 weeks in addition to standard nonsurgical therapy does not reduce periodontal indices including bleeding on probing, gingival recession, plaque index, or inflammation, among others, when compared with placebo (111708).
• Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for PAD. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 300 mg twice daily reduces pain associated with exercise in people with PAD and claudication when compared with placebo. However, exercise tolerance does not seem to improve (16391).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for PCOS. Details: Alpha-lipoic acid has been studied alone and in combination with inositol for the treatment of PCOS. Observational research shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 2000 mg, alone or in combination with myo-inositol (Sinopol, Laborest s.r.l.) 800-1000 mg, daily for 3-24 months is associated with reduced insulin levels and reduced menstrual cycle length, but not weight loss or improvements in hirsutism or insulin resistance, when compared with baseline (101869,101870). Another observational study shows that taking alpha lipoic acid 800 mg with a higher dose of myo-inositol 2000 mg is associated with slightly greater weight loss when compared with a lower dose of myo-inositol 1000 mg daily (103751). Also, taking alpha-lipoic acid 400 mg orally daily for 12 weeks does not affect levels of hormones, although improvements occur when alpha-lipoic acid is taken in combination with inositol 1000 mg daily (101870). The validity of this research is limited by its observational nature. A meta-analysis of 7 controlled trials in young, overweight adults with PCOS, shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600-1800 mg daily orally for 6-25 weeks, alone or in combination with inositol, reduces fasting blood sugar, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), when compared with control. However, there is no effect on insulin levels, body mass index, lipid profile, or hormone levels (112939).
• Preterm labor. It is unclear if vaginal alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for preventing preterm birth. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that administering alpha-lipoic acid 400 mg vaginally once nightly for 30 days after an episode of preterm labor prevents cervical shortening when compared with placebo (96226). It is unclear if these findings are associated with a reduction in the rate of preterm birth.
• Radiation exposure. Oral alpha-lipoic acid might reduce radiation levels in children living in areas contaminated with radiation. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 400 mg, alone or in combination with vitamin E (RRR-alpha-tocopherol) 200 mg, daily for 28 days reduces chemiluminescence in leukocytes and urinary radioactivity when compared to baseline in children living in areas contaminated with radiation (21669).
• Schizophrenia. There is mixed evidence regarding the effectiveness of oral alpha-lipoic acid in patients with schizophrenia. Details: A small clinical study in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia receiving conventional antipsychotic therapy shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 300 mg daily for 8 weeks improves scores related to negative symptoms of schizophrenia, but not positive symptoms, when compared with placebo (110114). A very small, open-label study in patients with stable, chronic schizophrenia shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 100 mg daily along with ongoing antipsychotic medication for 4 months improves symptoms by 64% when compared to baseline. Specific symptom domains, including negative and positive symptoms, excitement, depressive symptoms, and extrapyramidal symptoms all show improvement, although the validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group (96228). In contrast, another small clinical study in patients with schizophrenia stabilized on antipsychotic therapy for at least 1 year shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 100 mg daily for 16 weeks does not improve symptoms of schizophrenia or cognitive function when compared with placebo (110115). Also, a very small, open-label study in patients with schizophrenia shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg daily along with conventional antipsychotic therapy for 12 weeks does not improve positive or negative symptoms of schizophrenia when compared to baseline (110116). A meta-analysis of 4 studies in patients with clinically stable schizophrenia does not show any benefit of oral alpha-lipoic acid when compared with placebo, although details of the analysis are limited (112936). Overall, the reasons for the disparate research findings are unclear, but they may be due to differences in the alpha-lipoic acid dose, treatment duration, and severity of schizophrenia across studies. Alpha-lipoic acid has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical study in patients who responded well to antipsychotic therapy after a single episode of psychosis shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 150 mg, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 1000 mg, and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 500 mg twice daily does not prevent 2-year cumulative relapse or delay relapse time when compared with placebo (90675).
• Sciatica. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for sciatica. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with sciatica secondary to a herniated disc shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid (Byodiniral 300 QR, MDM SpA) 600 mg daily for 60 days improves signs and symptoms of sciatica and decreases the use of analgesics when compared with taking acetyl-L-carnitine (Nicetile, SigmaTau Ind. Farm. Riunite SpA) 1180 mg daily (21671). However, taking alpha-lipoic acid does not affect sleep quality in these patients. Alpha-lipoic acid has also been studied in combination with other ingredients for sciatica. Research in patients with sciatica secondary to a herniated disk shows that taking a combination of alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg with acetyl-L-carnitine, resveratrol, and cholecalciferol orally once daily for 30 days, concurrently with a physiotherapy protocol, reduces pain and disability, and improves quality of life when compared with the physiotherapy protocol alone (112933). Additionally, observational research in patients with sciatic pain due to herniated discs suggests that taking a combination of alpha-lipoic acid 800 mg, myrrh extract 200 mg, and palmitoylethanolamide 600 mg daily for 20 days along with 3 sessions of oxygen-ozone therapy over 30 days is associated with slight improvements in pain when compared with oxygen-ozone therapy alone (111113). It is unclear if the effects are due to alpha-lipoic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Tinnitus. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for tinnitus. Details: A small observational study in patients with tinnitus associated with cochlear dysfunction and metabolic syndrome suggests that taking alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg for 60 days is associated with improvements in several audiometric parameters and overall tinnitus handicap inventory scores, with a larger effect on functional and emotional scores, when compared to baseline. However, patients with tinnitus secondary to acoustic nerve lesions do not appear to benefit from alpha-lipoic acid supplementation (111705). The validity of these effects is limited by a lack of a comparator group.
• Toxin-induced liver damage. Oral alpha-lipoic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients being treated with anti-tuberculosis drugs shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid 250 mg, coenzyme Q10 200 mg, and acetyl-L-carnitine 250 mg twice daily for 2 weeks reduces the risk of drug-induced liver injury by 73% when compared with placebo (107445). It is unclear if these findings are due to alpha-lipoic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Vertigo. Oral alpha-lipoic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels less than 20 ng/mL shows that taking a specific combination product containing alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg, zinc 7.5 mg, L-carnosine 165 mg, curcumin 100 mg, piperine 1 mg, cholecalciferol 800 units, vitamin B2 0.8 mg, and vitamin B6 1 mg (Vertistop D, Difass) orally daily for 6 months moderately reduces the number of vertigo relapse episodes when compared with control. However, in patients with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels greater than 20 ng/mL that took a specific combination product containing alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg, zinc 7.5 mg, L-carnosine 165 mg, curcumin 100 mg and piperine 1 mg (Vertistop L, Difass) orally daily for 6 months there was no difference in relapse episodes when compared with control (111294). It is unclear if this effect is due to alpha-lipoic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Vitiligo. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for vitiligo when used in conjunction with phototherapy. Details: When used in combination with phototherapy, clinical research shows that taking alpha-lipoic acid (Shandong Qidu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) 300 mg daily for 6 months does not improve repigmentation when compared with placebo (104654). In contrast, a small clinical study shows that taking two tablets of a specific combination product (Lipoacid Combi, General Topics) containing alpha-lipoic acid 50 mg, vitamin C 50 mg, vitamin E 20 mg, and polyunsaturated fatty acids 12%, starting 8 weeks prior to ultraviolet B phototherapy and continuing for 6 months during phototherapy treatment, seems to increase the likelihood of repigmentation by 29% when compared with placebo (19210). It is not clear if this effect is due to alpha-lipoic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Wilson disease. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-lipoic acid for Wilson disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alpha-lipoic acid for this condition.
• Wound healing. It is unclear if oral alpha-lipoic acid is beneficial for wound healing. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking a specific alpha-lipoic acid product (Byodinoral 300, M.D.M. Spa) 300 mg one hour before and one hour after hyperbaric oxygen therapy administered daily for 14-30 days reduces wound area in 30% more patients with ischemic ulcers when compared with hyperbaric oxygen therapy alone (21677).
• Wrinkled skin. Although there is interest in using topical alpha-lipoic acid for wrinkled skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alpha-lipoic acid for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate alpha-lipoic acid for these uses.

(Read more about ALPHA-LIPOIC ACID)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Chromium deficiency. Oral or parenteral chromium is effective for the treatment and prevention of chromium deficiency. Details: Taking chromium orally is effective for preventing and treating symptoms of chromium deficiency, including hyperglycemia, glycosuria, sudden weight loss, peripheral neuropathy, and confusion (7135).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Diabetes. Oral chromium seems to be modestly beneficial for improving glycemic control in diabetes, especially when used in doses greater than 200 mcg daily and in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. It is unclear if chromium helps to prevent the development of diabetes. Details: Epidemiological research has found that lower toenail chromium levels are associated with an increased risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease (11908). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed a qualified health claim stating that chromium picolinate may reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes. However, the FDA has determined that any relationship between chromium picolinate and type 2 diabetes is highly uncertain and is based on limited scientific evidence (102362). Research on the use of chromium for the TREATMENT of type 2 diabetes is conflicting but seems to show modest benefit in some patients. Many small clinical studies show that taking chromium orally decreases fasting blood glucose, postprandial glucose, insulin, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels, and increases insulin sensitivity (6867,7137,12390,15169,14440,42628,42638,95097,103745). However, other small clinical studies show that chromium is no better than placebo for improving glycemic indices in patients with diabetes (7060,14325,42679,42707,90059,103746,103749). Some of these studies may not have been adequately powered and some had a high risk of bias. Furthermore, these studies had high heterogeneity related to study population and size, chromium supplementation duration, formulation, and dose, and accepted standards of diabetes care. Multiple meta-analyses pooling results of these small clinical trials also show mixed results (90055,90063,95098,105026,110610). The most recent and comprehensive meta-analyses show that chromium picolinate lowers HbA1C by about 0.6%; while it is unclear if chromium yeast, chromium dinicocysteinate, or chromium with biotin or other natural ingredients are beneficial. Chromium seems to be most beneficial in doses of greater than 200 mcg taken for 12 weeks or longer, and in patients with poorly controlled diabetes with a baseline HbA1C of 8% or greater (90063,105026). There is also speculation that chromium might primarily benefit patients with low chromium levels; however, there has not been an analysis specifically evaluating this population (6867,7058,13725,14325,95098). Some research suggests that chromium might also modestly improve lipid levels in patients with type 2 diabetes (1934,6867,95098). A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials including patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking chromium 42-1000 mcg orally daily for 5-26 weeks decreases triglyceride levels by 7 mg/dL and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 2 mg/dL when compared with control. Taking chromium did not affect low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. However, the validity of these results is limited by high heterogeneity (110605). In addition, some meta-analyses have failed to demonstrate any effects of chromium on lipid levels (110610). A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials including patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking chromium 200-1000 mcg orally daily for 8-25 weeks lowers diastolic blood pressure by 2 mmHg, but not systolic blood pressure or body mass index, when compared with placebo (110607). Preliminary clinical research shows that chromium picolinate might improve metabolic parameters in patients with other forms of diabetes as well. This includes those with type 1 diabetes (1935), diabetes secondary to corticosteroid use (5039,42829), and gestational diabetes (42817).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Hypertension. Meta-analyses of small clinical trials suggest that oral chromium does not lower blood pressure by a clinically meaningful amount. Details: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in adults with different metabolic disorders shows that taking chromium 42-1000 mcg orally daily for 12-24 weeks does not lower systolic or diastolic blood pressure when compared with placebo (110609). A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in adults with different chronic disorders shows that taking chromium 42-1000 mcg orally daily for 4-25 weeks lowers systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 3 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, when compared with placebo. However, the validity of this meta-analysis is limited by high heterogeneity (110604). Another meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials including patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking chromium 200-1000 mcg orally daily for 8-25 weeks lowers diastolic blood pressure by 2 mmHg, but not systolic blood pressure, when compared with placebo (110607). In addition, the validity of these results is limited by inclusion of patients with and without hypertension at baseline (110604,110607,110609).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (Prediabetes). Oral chromium does not seem to improve glycemic indices in patients with prediabetes. Details: Some clinical research shows that adults with impaired glucose tolerance do not have improved glycemic parameters or insulin sensitivity after taking chromium picolinate 500-1000 mcg daily for up to 6 months when compared with placebo (13053,42670). Likewise, a small clinical study in elderly patients with impaired glucose tolerance shows that chromium supplements do not improve glucose tolerance or triglyceride or cholesterol levels when compared with placebo (13722). Finally, a preliminary clinical study in overweight or obese adults with prediabetes shows that taking two capsules of a combination product containing chromium, cinnamon, and carnosine (Glycabiane, PiLeJe) daily for 4 months decreases fasting plasma glucose by approximately 4 mg/dL when compared with placebo, but does not improve fasting plasma insulin, measures of insulin sensitivity or resistance, or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) (94234). The small effect on fasting plasma glucose is clinically insignificant and may be due to the other ingredients in this product.
• Schizophrenia. Oral chromium does not seem to improve psychological measures in patients with schizophrenia. Details: Clinical research in patients with schizophrenia shows that taking chromium polynicotinate 400 mcg daily for 3 months does not affect weight or mental status when compared with placebo (42613).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Antiretroviral-induced insulin resistance. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial for preventing antiretroviral-induced insulin resistance. Details: Preliminary clinical research in HIV patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) shows that taking chromium nicotinate 200 mcg or chromium picolinate 1000 mcg daily for 8-16 weeks may help decrease insulin resistance and increase glucose disposal when compared to baseline (42630,42662). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if chromium enhances athletic performance, although some research suggests that it may improve body composition when used in conjunction with exercise. Details: One large clinical study shows taking chromium 400 mcg daily, in conjunction with resistance training, can increase weight loss, body fat loss, and lean body mass when compared with placebo and resistance training (6868). However, other, very small clinical studies show that adding chromium picolinate or chromium chloride 177-400 mcg daily to a weight-training program does not improve body composition when compared with weight-training alone (6860,6861,6862,42747). These studies may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference in outcomes.
• Atypical depression. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with atypical depression. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with atypical depression shows that taking chromium picolinate 400 mcg daily for 2 weeks followed by 600 mcg daily for an additional 6 weeks improves response and remission rates when compared with placebo (10309). However, other clinical research shows that taking elemental chromium 400 mcg in the form of chromium picolinate daily for 2 weeks followed by 600 mcg daily for an additional 6 weeks does not improve most symptoms of atypical depression, although appetite and sexual drive may improve, when compared with placebo (42600).
• Beta blocker-induced dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with dyslipidemia due to beta-blocker use. Details: One small clinical study in patients who take beta-blockers shows that taking glucose tolerance factor (GTF)-chromium 600 mcg daily for 2 months increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 16%, but does not affect other lipid parameters, when compared with placebo (5040).
• Binge eating disorder. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with binge eating disorder. Details: One small clinical study in overweight adults with binge eating disorder shows that taking chromium picolinate 600 or 1000 mcg by mouth daily for 6 months does not affect binge eating frequency, body weight, or depressive symptoms when compared with placebo (90057).
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with treatment-resistant, rapid-cycling bipolar disorder shows that taking chromium chloride (Hypo-A Chrom, Hypo-A GmbH) 600-800 mcg daily for up to 2 years can decrease the frequency of affective episodes by approximately three episodes annually when compared to baseline (42618). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Cognitive impairment. It is unclear if oral chromium prevents cognitive impairment. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking chromium picolinate standardized to contain elemental chromium 1000 mcg daily for 12 weeks does not improve memory or depression in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment when compared with placebo. However, results from neuroimaging scans suggest that chromium increases the activity of certain regions of the brain during memory tasks when compared with placebo (42666).
• Hyperlipidemia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral chromium may modestly reduce lipid levels in patients with hyperlipidemia. Details: One small clinical study in patients with atherosclerotic disease shows that taking chromium 250 mcg as chromium chloride daily for 7-16 months decreases triglycerides and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, but not other lipid parameters, when compared with placebo (7060). Other small clinical studies in adults with hyperlipidemia show that taking chromium picolinate 200 mcg daily for 6 weeks, chromium polynicotinate 200 mcg twice daily, or brewer's yeast containing 48 mcg elemental chromium daily for 6-8 weeks decrease total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when compared to baseline (37178,42585,42710). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of comparison with a control group. A meta-analysis of small heterogeneous clinical studies in patients mostly without hyperlipidemia shows that taking chromium orally does not affect lipid levels when compared with placebo (105029). A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials including patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking chromium 42-1000 mcg orally daily for 5-26 weeks modestly improves triglyceride and HDL cholesterol levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with control. However, the validity of these results is limited by high heterogeneity and inclusion of patients with and without hyperlipidemia (110605). In addition, some meta-analyses have failed to demonstrate any effects of chromium on lipid levels in adults with diabetes (110610). Limited research has tested high-dose chromium in children. One small clinical study in children with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking chromium polynicotinate 400-600 mcg with glucomannan 1000-1500 mg twice daily for 8 weeks reduces total and LDL cholesterol when compared to baseline (90061). It is unclear if this effect is due to chromium, glucomannan, or the combination. Finally, chromium does not seem to reduce lipid levels in people without hyperlipidemia.
• Hypoglycemia. It is unclear if oral chromium helps to reverse or prevent hypoglycemia. Details: One very small clinical study in patients with reactive hypoglycemia shows that taking chromium chloride 200 mcg daily for 3 months increases blood glucose levels and improves insulin binding and hypoglycemic symptoms following an oral glucose load (6859). Another small clinical study in patients with symptomatic hypoglycemia shows that taking chromium yeast (Biochrome, Pharma-Nord) 125 mcg daily for 3 months improves symptoms, including chilliness, trembling, and disorientation, when compared with baseline (42711). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with metabolic syndrome. Details: One small clinical study in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that taking a particular chromium picolinate product (Chromax, Nutrition 21) 500 mcg twice daily for 16 weeks does not affect weight, waist circumference, insulin sensitivity, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C), or lipid levels when compared with placebo (42654).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). It is unclear if oral chromium helps to prevent MI. Details: Epidemiological research has found that low toenail chromium concentrations are associated with an increased risk of MI (13728). However, toenail chromium concentrations might not be a reliable predictor of body stores of chromium. There is also no reliable research showing that chromium supplements can prevent MI.
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral chromium slows NAFLD progression. Details: One small clinical study in patients with NAFLD shows that taking chromium picolinate 200 mcg two times daily after meals for 12 weeks does not affect liver enzyme levels or body weight when compared with placebo (105027).
• Obesity. Although some research suggests that oral chromium may increase weight loss, this increase in weight loss is not likely to be considered clinically relevant. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical studies in overweight or obese adults show that taking chromium picolinate 200-1000 mcg daily for 12-16 weeks might result in a cumulative weight loss of about 0.5-1 kg when compared with placebo (90062,90065). However, this small reduction in weight is unlikely to be considered clinically significant. Furthermore, certain small clinical studies in healthy, overweight or obese adults and children show that taking oral chromium 200-1000 mcg daily for 6-24 weeks does not reduce weight when compared with control (6860,13727,17224,42680). Some of these studies may not have been adequately powered to detect a smaller effect. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials including patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking chromium 200-1000 mcg orally daily for 8-25 weeks does not lower body mass index when compared with placebo. However, the validity of these results is limited by inclusion of patients with and without obesity at baseline (110607).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral chromium improves symptoms of PCOS. Details: One small clinical study in patients with PCOS shows that taking chromium picolinate 1000 mcg daily for 6 months along with diet and exercise counseling decreases body mass index and improves rates of ovulation and regular menstruation when compared with placebo (95094). Also, some clinical research shows that taking chromium picolinate (21st Century HealthCare, Inc. or Nature Made) 200 mcg daily orally for 8 weeks increases insulin sensitivity when compared with placebo (95095,98687). However, other preliminary clinical research shows that taking chromium picolinate 200 mcg daily for 4 months does not affect insulin sensitivity or improve ovulation rates (42603). Although chromium picolinate at doses of less than 1000 mcg might have very small effects on fasting glucose, these doses do not seem to have clinically beneficial effects on fasting glucose, pregnancy rate, or testosterone levels (95094,95095,98687). A lower dose of chromium has also been studied in combination with carnitine. One small clinical study in overweight adults with PCOS shows that taking chromium picolinate 200 mcg daily with carnitine 1000 mg daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces fasting blood glucose, insulin resistance, and body weight, and slightly increases insulin sensitivity, when compared with placebo (103747). However, it is unclear if this benefit is clinically significant. Additionally, it is unclear if these effects are due to chromium, carnitine, or the combination. Carnitine has demonstrated clinical benefit when used alone in PCOS.
• Turner syndrome. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with this condition. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking brewer's yeast 30 grams containing chromium 50 mcg daily for 8 weeks might improve abnormalities in glucose and lipid metabolism when compared with baseline in patients with Turner syndrome, a genetic disorder that has a high incidence of diabetes (13729). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. More evidence is needed to rate chromium for these uses.

(Read more about CHROMIUM)

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Oral cod liver oil does not seem to be beneficial for COVID-19 prevention. Details: A large clinical trial in adults shows that taking cod liver oil 5 mL daily for up to 6 months in winter does not prevent any or serious COVID-19 infection compared with placebo. Each 5 mL of cod liver oil provided vitamin D3 400 IU, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 0.4 grams, and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 0.5 grams (110378).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). It is unclear if oral cod liver oil prevents AMD. Details: A population study from Iceland suggests that taking oral cod liver oil supplements daily is not associated with a reduced risk of developing AMD over a 5-year period when compared to not taking cod liver oil (94753). However, since dietary fish intake is relatively high in this population, additional cod liver oil supplementation may not have been beneficial.
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if oral cod liver oil during pregnancy prevents allergic rhinitis in the child. In addition, it is unclear if oral cod liver oil during childhood prevents allergic rhinitis. Details: Population research from Norway found that taking cod liver oil at least once weekly during pregnancy or breast-feeding is not associated with a reduced risk of allergic rhinitis in the child. Also, consumption of cod liver oil at least once weekly at 2 years of age is not associated with a reduced risk of allergic rhinitis at age 6 years (101989). Since the participants in this study normally consumed high amounts of oily fish and cod liver oil, it is unclear if cod liver oil would be beneficial in populations with normally low intake.
• Arrhythmia. It is unclear if oral cod liver oil is beneficial for ventricular premature complexes (VPCs). Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking cod liver oil (Möller Tran) 15 mL orally daily for 16 weeks might reduce VPCs in people with moderate to low-grade ventricular arrhythmias and no significant heart failure. Approximately 44% of patients treated with cod liver oil achieved a clinically relevant reduction in VPCs, compared to only 15% taking placebo (7360). However, it is not clear if this reduction in VPCs correlates with a reduction in the risk of cardiovascular-related mortality. Other clinical research shows that taking cod liver oil 20 mL orally daily for 6 weeks does not reduce the number of ventricular extrasystoles or other arrhythmias in men with arrhythmias following myocardial infarction (MI) (94759).
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral cod liver oil during pregnancy or while breast-feeding prevents asthma in the child. In addition, it is unclear if oral cod liver oil during childhood prevents asthma. Details: Population research has found that taking cod liver oil 1-3 times weekly during pregnancy is associated with a 43% reduced risk of asthma in the child at 6 years of age. However, taking cod liver oil at least 4 times weekly during pregnancy, or taking it while breast-feeding, is not associated with a reduced risk of asthma in the child at 6 years of age. Also, consumption of cod liver oil at least once weekly at 2 years of age is not associated with a reduced risk of asthma at age 6 years (101989). Since the participants in this study normally consumed high amounts of oily fish and cod liver oil, it is unclear if cod liver oil would be more beneficial in populations with normally low intake.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if oral cod liver oil during pregnancy or while breast-feeding prevents eczema in the child. In addition, it is unclear if oral cod liver oil during childhood prevents eczema. Details: Population research has found that taking cod liver oil at least once weekly during pregnancy or breast-feeding is not associated with a reduced risk of eczema in the child. Also, consumption of cod liver oil at least once weekly at 2 years of age is not associated with a reduced risk of eczema at age 6 years (101989). However, in the infant, taking cod liver oil at least 4 times a week at one year of age is associated with a 29% reduced prevalence of eczema (101989).
• Burns. Although there has been interest in using topical cod liver oil for burns, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cod liver oil for this condition.
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). Although there has been interest in using oral cod liver oil for CHD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cod liver oil for this condition.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral cod liver oil prevents depressive symptoms. Details: Evidence from a large population study including Norwegian adults aged 40-49 and 70-74 years shows that taking cod liver oil orally daily is associated with a 29% lower odds of depressive symptoms when compared with not taking cod liver oil (15648).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral cod liver oil is beneficial in gestational or type 1 diabetes. Details: In women with gestational diabetes, clinical research shows that taking cod liver oil 500 mg daily for 4 weeks, starting at 24-28 weeks gestation, does not improve levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose, insulin resistance, or plasma lipids when compared with placebo. However, taking cod liver oil for 12-16 weeks reduces HbA1c by 8.4%, fasting blood glucose by 41%, and insulin resistance by 43%, when compared with baseline. These differences were statistically significant when compared with placebo. Taking cod liver oil also resulted in a 17.5% reduction in perinatal complications, especially postpartum infections and Caesarian section (101988). Preliminary clinical research in patients with type 1 diabetes and elevated cholesterol levels shows that taking cod liver oil (Eskisol emulsion, Pharma-Vinci A/s) 21 mL orally daily for 8 weeks does not lower total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol levels, or affect insulin requirement, HbA1c, or blood glucose levels. There was a small effect on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (3399).
• Diabetic nephropathy. Although there has been interest in using oral cod liver oil for diabetic nephropathy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cod liver oil for this condition.
• Diaper rash. Although there has been interest in using topical cod liver oil for diaper rash, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cod liver oil for this condition.
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. Although there has been interest in using oral cod liver oil for exercise-induced muscle damage, there is insufficient reliable evidence about the clinical effects of cod liver oil for this purpose.
• Familial hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral cod liver oil is beneficial in familial hypercholesterolemia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking cod liver oil does not lower total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or triglyceride levels, or increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, in patients with familial type IIa hypercholesteremia when compared to baseline (10083).
• Glaucoma. Although there has been interest in using oral cod liver oil for glaucoma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cod liver oil for this condition.
• Hemorrhoids. Although there has been interest in using topical cod liver oil for hemorrhoids, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cod liver oil for this condition.
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral cod liver oil is beneficial for lowering lipid levels; the available research is conflicting. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking cod liver oil (Eskisol emulsion, Pharma-Vinci A/s) 21 mL orally daily for 8 weeks does not lower total cholesterol or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in patients with type 1 diabetes and elevated cholesterol levels. However, it appears to increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 5 mg/dL when compared to baseline (3399). Other clinical research in men with a history of myocardial infarction shows that taking an Icelandic cod liver oil 20 mL orally daily for 6 weeks appears to decrease triglycerides by 18 mg/dL when compared to baseline, with no improvement in LDL cholesterol levels (94758). A large, single-blind clinical study of patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking oral cod liver oil 415 mg daily in conjunction with oral rosuvastatin 10 mg daily for 30 days further reduces total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels when compared with rosuvastatin monotherapy (107491). It is unclear if this effect is due to cod liver oil, rosuvastatin, or the combination.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral cod liver oil is beneficial for lowering blood pressure. Details: In adults with type 1 diabetes, albuminuria, and mild hypertension, taking cod liver oil (Eskisol emulsion, Pharma-Vinci A/s) 21 mL orally daily for 8 weeks can reduce systolic blood pressure by 7 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by 5 mmHg when compared to baseline (3399). A small clinical study in healthy men shows that taking cod liver oil (British Cod Liver Oils, Hull, UK) 5 mL orally four times daily with meals for 6 weeks can reduce systolic blood pressure by 13 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by 12 mmHg when compared to baseline (4026). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the lack of comparator groups.
• Hypertriglyceridemia. It is unclear if oral cod liver oil is beneficial for lowering triglyceride levels. Details: Clinical research in men with a history of myocardial infarction shows that taking cod liver oil 20 mL orally daily for 6 weeks appears to decrease triglycerides by 18 mg/dL when compared to baseline, with no improvement in LDL cholesterol levels (94758). The clinical significance of these changes in patients with hypertriglyceridemia are unclear.
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is unclear if oral cod liver oil is beneficial in IBD. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking cod liver oil (Möller Axellus AS) 10 mL orally three times daily before meals for 14 days reduces joint pain intensity in adults with arthralgias associated with Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis when compared to baseline (94754). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Myocardial infarction (MI). It is unclear if oral cod liver oil is beneficial for preventing MI. Details: A large, non-blinded clinical study in patients at moderate to high risk for a cardiovascular event shows that taking oral cod liver oil 415 mg daily for up to 12 months does not affect the overall incidence of MI or the incidence of fatal or non-fatal MI when compared with no supplementation (107490). It is unclear if cod liver oil supplementation has any effect on modifiable risk factors such as hypertension and hypercholesteremia, which may impact the long-term incidence of MI.
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral cod liver oil is beneficial when used with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking cod liver oil 10 mL orally daily for 24 weeks, in combination with NSAIDs, does not decrease pain or inflammation when compared with NSAID treatment alone (3398).
• Otitis media. It is unclear if oral cod liver oil prevents otitis media in children. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking cod liver oil 5 mL orally daily, in combination with a children's multivitamin-mineral preparation containing selenium, can reduce the number of days of antibiotic therapy in an otitis media (OM) season in young children aged 0.8-4.4 years. The mean percentage of days on antibiotics in the OM season decreased by 12% when compared with the previous year's OM season, when no supplements were used (10151).
• Respiratory tract infections. It is unclear if oral cod liver oil prevents respiratory tract infections. Details: A large clinical trial in adults shows that taking cod liver oil 5 mL daily for up to 6 months in winter does not prevent acute respiratory infections compared with placebo. Each 5 mL of cod liver oil provided vitamin D3 400 IU, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 0.4 grams, and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 0.5 grams (110378). However, preliminary clinical research shows that giving children a specific cod liver oil product (Carlson for Kids cod liver oil lemon flavor, Carlson Labs) along with a multivitamin (Carlson for Kids Scooter Rabbit Chewable Vitamins and Minerals, Carlson Labs) for about 5 months decreases the number of doctor's office visits for respiratory tract infections when compared with no supplementation. Children aged 1-5 years received 1 teaspoon of cod liver oil and half a multivitamin tablet daily; children aged 0.5-1 year received half doses (94756).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if oral cod liver oil is beneficial in RA. Details: A preliminary, uncontrolled study suggests that taking a specific cod liver oil product (Seven Seas Neutrataste, Seven Seas Ltd.) 1 gram daily for 3 months might decrease pain, morning stiffness, and swelling in people with symptoms suggestive of RA who have not received any prior treatment (94757). Other clinical research shows that taking cod liver oil and fish oil (Seven Seas Marine Oil, Seven Seas Ltd.) 10 grams daily for 36 weeks can reduce NSAID use in patients with RA. About 4-fold more patients taking cod liver oil and fish oil can reduce NSAID intake by at least 30% when compared with placebo (65855). It is unclear if this effect is due to cod liver oil, fish oil, or the combination.
• Vitamin D deficiency. It is unclear if oral cod liver oil is beneficial as a vitamin D supplement. Details: Cod liver oil is sometimes used as a source of vitamin D. Evidence from population research shows that increased daily intake of cod liver oil supplements is associated with higher serum levels of vitamin D (94760). Also, a population study of postmenopausal women in northern Scotland shows that those taking a daily cod liver oil supplement are less likely to be vitamin D deficient during the winter and spring than those not taking a supplement (94761). However, preliminary clinical research shows that taking a low dose of cod liver oil (Möller Axellus AS) orally to provide 200 IU of vitamin D daily for 8 weeks during the winter does not maintain serum vitamin D at typical summer levels (94755).
• Wound healing. Although there has been interest in using topical cod liver oil for wound healing, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cod liver oil for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate cod liver oil for these uses.

(Read more about COD LIVER OIL)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Copper deficiency. Oral or intravenous copper is beneficial for treatment of copper deficiency. Details: Taking copper orally or intravenously is effective for treating copper deficiency and anemia due to copper deficiency. Copper deficiency is rare. It is seen most commonly in people receiving prolonged parenteral nutrition (7135). Oral cupric sulfate has been used in doses up to 0.1 mg/kg daily (7135). Copper 1-2 mg per day in parenteral nutrition solution has also been used (505).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Alzheimer disease. Oral copper does not seem to be beneficial for Alzheimer disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking copper orotate dihydrate, providing 8 mg of elemental copper, daily for 12 months does not improve scores on evaluation scales for Alzheimer disease when compared with placebo (45949). There is also some concern that copper could have detrimental effects. Observational research has found that people with Alzheimer disease have higher levels of copper in their blood than people without the disease (95917); the clinical significance of this finding is unclear.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Oral copper has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific combination product containing copper (NicAzel, Elorac Inc.) 1-4 tablets daily for 8 weeks reduces inflammatory lesions in patients with inflammatory acne when compared with baseline. Other ingredients in this product include nicotinamide, azelaic acid, zinc, pyridoxine, and folic acid; specific quantities are not known (90800). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Brain tumor. It is unclear if oral copper is beneficial for use in glioblastoma. Details: A moderate-sized open-label clinical study in adults with first recurrence of glioblastoma receiving alkylating chemotherapy shows that taking elemental copper 2.5 mg with disulfiram 400 mg daily for 6 months does not improve survival but does result in significantly more adverse effects (e.g., elevated liver enzymes) when compared with control. The trial was stopped early due to safety concerns (112376).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although there is interest in using oral copper for CVD prevention, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of copper for this purpose.
• Chemotherapy-induced acral erythema. Oral copper has only been evaluated in combination with resveratrol; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults with advanced gastric cancers receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy suggests that taking copper (Chelated Copper, JR Carlson Laboratories, LLC) with resveratrol three times daily for up to 6 months may reduce the incidence of grades 3 and 4 acral erythema (112377). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Chemotherapy-induced anemia. Oral copper has only been evaluated in combination with resveratrol; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults with advanced gastric cancers receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy suggests that taking copper (Chelated Copper, JR Carlson Laboratories, LLC) with resveratrol three times daily for up to 6 months does not appear to reduce the incidence of grades 3 and 4 anemia (112377). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Oral copper has only been evaluated in combination with resveratrol; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults with advanced gastric cancers receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy suggests that taking copper (Chelated Copper, JR Carlson Laboratories, LLC) with resveratrol three times daily for up to 6 months may reduce the incidence of grades 3 and 4 diarrhea (112377). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Chemotherapy-induced leukopenia. Oral copper has only been evaluated in combination with resveratrol; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults with advanced gastric cancers receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy suggests that taking copper (Chelated Copper, JR Carlson Laboratories, LLC) with resveratrol three times daily for up to 6 months does not appear to reduce the incidence of grades 3 and 4 neutropenia or febrile neutropenia (112377). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Oral copper has only been evaluated in combination with resveratrol; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults with advanced gastric cancers receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy suggests that taking copper (Chelated Copper, JR Carlson Laboratories, LLC) with resveratrol three times daily for up to 6 months may reduce the incidence of grades 3 and 4 vomiting (112377). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). It is unclear if compression stockings containing copper are beneficial for lipodermatosclerosis in patients with CVI. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that using compression stockings impregnated with copper for 8 weeks does not improve overall symptoms of lipodermatosclerosis secondary to chronic venous disease when compared with using a compression stocking without copper. However, the affected surface area may be reduced by approximately 16% by 2 weeks when copper-impregnated compression stockings are used (101809).
• Dental plaque. It is unclear if rinsing the mouth with copper is beneficial for reducing dental plaque. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that rinsing the mouth with a solution of copper 1.1 mmol/L for 4 days decreases plaque accumulation when compared with a placebo solution (46006).
• Diarrhea. Oral copper has only been evaluated in combination with zinc; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children 6 months to 5 years of age presenting to a hospital in India with acute watery or bloody diarrhea shows that taking a solution providing zinc 2 mg/kg and copper 0.2 mg/kg orally daily for 2 weeks does not reduce the duration of diarrhea, the weight of stool, or the need for rehydration when compared with placebo (87166). It also does not seem to reduce the recurrence of diarrhea or improve weight gain over the next 3 months (95540).
• Oral mucositis. Oral copper has only been evaluated in combination with resveratrol; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults with advanced gastric cancers receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy suggests that taking copper (Chelated Copper, JR Carlson Laboratories, LLC) with resveratrol three times daily for up to 6 months may reduce the incidence of grades 3 and 4 oral mucositis (112377). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Osteoarthritis. Although there is interest in using topical copper for osteoarthritis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of copper for this condition.
• Osteoporosis. Oral copper has only been evaluated in combination with other minerals; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in postmenopausal adults shows that taking copper 2.5 mg in combination with zinc 15 mg, manganese 5 mg, and calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years can slow bone loss when compared with taking either calcium or the trace minerals alone (1994).
• Postoperative infection. It is unclear if copper-impregnated wound dressings are beneficial for the prevention of postoperative infection. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that using a wound dressing impregnated with copper oxide 3% by weight reduces the incidence of a surgical site infection in the 30-day period following a caesarean section by 39%, but does not reduce length of hospital stay or readmission rate, when compared with a non-copper wound dressing. Eight patients would need to be treated with the copper-impregnated dressing to prevent one infection (105363). This study is limited by the use of a telephone questionnaire to assess the suspicion of infection.
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral copper is beneficial for improving symptoms of SLE. Details: Copper status does not appear to be associated with the risk of SLE (101810). Additionally, one small clinical study shows that taking copper 3 mg daily, alone or in combination with fish oil, for 24 weeks does not affect symptoms of SLE when compared with placebo (12953).
• Tinea pedis. Although there is interest in using topical copper for tinea pedis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of copper for this condition.
• Wound healing. It is unclear if topical copper sulfate can improve the healing of umbilical granuloma. Details: A small clinical study in children 1-3 months of age with treatment-naïve umbilical granuloma shows that a single application of copper sulfate to the affected site results in complete resolution in 70% of patients, compared with 90% of patients receiving topical sodium chloride twice daily for 5 days. Some patients who received a second application of copper sulfate experienced full healing; however, it is unclear if this was due to the treatment or natural resolution (109403). More evidence is needed to rate copper for these uses.

(Read more about COPPER)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Cranberry products may possibly reduce the risk of repeat, symptomatic UTI in females with recurrent UTI, in children, and in people susceptible to UTI following kidney transplant, urogenital surgery, or radiation therapy near the urogenital system. While some positive evidence exists, most research suggests that cranberry products do not seem to reduce the risk of UTI in older adults in institutions, pregnant patients, or adults with neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Cranberry is not recommended for the treatment of UTI in any population. Details: Cranberry appears to reduce the risk of UTI in some populations but not others. In healthy females at an increased risk of UTI or history of recurrent UTI, meta-analyses of clinical trials show that cranberry products decrease the overall risk of recurrent or first-time UTI by 26% to 35% (46473,92578,96739,111407). In 2019, the American Urological Association published guidelines stating that, based on low certainty evidence, clinicians may offer cranberry tablets or juice as prophylaxis for females with recurrent UTIs. Due to a lack of compelling evidence for any specific product, the guidelines recommend choosing formulations based on availability and tolerability (100855). In 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved qualified health claims stating that consuming cranberry juice in doses of at least 8 ounces daily, or cranberry supplements in doses of at least 500 mg daily, may help reduce the risk of recurrent UTI in healthy females. However, the FDA has concluded that there is limited scientific evidence to support these claims (103302). The benefits of cranberry for prevention of UTI during pregnancy are unclear. Subgroup analysis of meta-analyses suggest that cranberry supplementation does not reduce the risk of UTI in pregnant adults compared with placebo or no treatment (100855,111407). A preliminary clinical study shows that drinking cranberry juice 240 mL three times daily until delivery does not reduce the frequency of asymptomatic bacteriuria or symptomatic UTI during pregnancy, although the study was not adequately powered to detect a difference in these outcomes (16415). In contrast, one preliminary clinical trial shows that UTI frequency was reduced in 70.5% of those ingesting cranberry juice 250 mL four times daily, compared with only 32% of those taking placebo (93670). In children, a meta-analysis shows that taking cranberry products probably reduces the risk of subsequent symptomatic UTIs by up to 54% compared with placebo or no treatment, but does not specify a particular formulation (111407). Clinical trials show that daily consumption of cranberry syrup (Pharmatoka), cranberry juice (Cranberry UR-50, Kikkoman Company) 100 mL, cranberry-lingonberry juice 50 mL, and cranberry extract (Anthocran) 120 mg reduce the risk of UTI recurrence in children (46452,96733,96737,108055). In contrast, another clinical trial shows that drinking cranberry juice (Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc) 5 mL/kg daily for 6 months does not reduce the incidence of recurrent UTI when compared with placebo, although it does decrease the total number of UTI episodes and length of antimicrobial therapy per child (46470). In older, institutionalized adults, a meta-analysis of 5 studies evaluating the effectiveness of cranberry products shows little or no benefit in preventing symptomatic, culture-verified UTIs (111407). A clinical study in females residing in long-term care (LTC) facilities shows that taking a specific cranberry supplement (Ellura, Pharmatoka) once daily for 1 year does not reduce the incidence of UTI or asymptomatic bacteriuria (92517). However, clinical trials of cranberry products in elderly patients in LTC facilities suggest that cranberry may be more effective in patients at a higher risk for UTIs, such as those with diabetes, long-term catheterization, or recurrent UTIs (90041,108055), and in patients with E. coli-related UTIs (46389,46472). In one small study, providing all patients living in a LTC facility with 4 ounces of cranberry juice or six tablets of a specific concentrated cranberry product (Azo-Cranberry, i-Health, Inc.) daily for 13 months decreased the facility's overall monthly UTI rate from 27.7 to 20.7 (46492). In another clinical trial, taking cranberry juice cocktail (Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc) 300 mL daily for 6 months decreased the rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria plus pyuria by 13% in older females living in institutional settings (7008). In another clinical trial, taking a cranberry capsule 500 mg, standardized to 1.8% PACs, twice daily for 12 months decreased the risk of UTI by around 26% in patients at high-risk for UTI, including those with catheters, diabetes, or at least one UTI in the previous 12 months (90041). Meta-analyses and clinical research show that cranberry products do not reduce the risk of UTI associated with neurogenic bladder, neuromuscular dysfunction, or insufficient bladder emptying in adults or children (2811,6759,11980,46379,46425,46473,90044,92578,96737,108055,111407). However, one study found benefit in patients with neurogenic bladder due to spinal cord injury taking cranberry capsules (Cran-Max, Proprietary Nutritionals, Inc.) 500 mg daily (46443). Cranberry products have also been evaluated in a variety of other high-risk populations, with mixed results. A meta-analysis of 7 studies shows that cranberry products reduce the risk of UTIs in people with increased susceptibility to UTI due to an intervention (e.g., kidney transplant, radiotherapy to urogenital system, or urogenital surgery) when compared with placebo (111407). Cranberry extracts do not seem to reduce the risk of UTIs in individuals undergoing hysterectomy and/or anterior vaginal repair (46465), pelvic floor surgery (104245), or in patients with multiple sclerosis (46496,111407). Taking cranberry powder capsules (NurtiCran90, Petefa AB) 550 mg three times daily for 5 days does not reduce the UTI rate at days 5 or 14 when compared with placebo in postoperative females with hip fracture receiving a urinary catheter; however, the study was not adequately powered to detect a difference in this outcome (96734). Other preliminary clinical research in elderly males with benign prostatic hyperplasia and a recent UTI shows that taking a standardized cranberry extract (Anthocran) 120 mg daily for 60 days reduces the UTI recurrence rate by about 62% when compared with placebo (96735). Cranberry supplements have been studied in a variety of formulations, but it is unclear whether certain cranberry formulations are better than others (111407). Most positive studies utilized oral cranberry EXTRACTS in tablet, powder, or capsule form (6760,17210,46366,46432,93669,111407). Some products (Cranberry Supreme, GNC; Cranpac, IPCA Laboratories), taken as 200 mg twice daily, were standardized to provide 100-120 mg of proanthocyanidins (PACs) daily (46432). Some of these studies used capsules containing 400 mg cranberry solids twice daily (6760) or Natural Cranberry Extract (Solgar Vitamin and Herb Co.) 800 mg twice daily (17210). However, a clinical study in healthy females with a history of UTIs shows that taking a specific cranberry extract product (Urophenol; Diana Food) does not reduce the risk of symptomatic UTI when taken at a dose of 120 mg twice daily, standardized to 15% PACs, or at a dose of 1 mg twice daily, standardized to 1% PACs. A subgroup analysis suggests that the high dose may have modest benefit in those with less than 5 UTIs a year (108054). Cranberry JUICE or syrup has yielded mixed results for the prevention of UTI in patients with a history of recurrent UTIs, with some showing significant benefit (8253,46366,96736,111407). These studies used cranberry juice 240-250 mL 1-3 times daily (46366,96736), cranberry syrup, or a combination beverage containing cranberry juice plus lingonberry juice (Maija) 50 mL daily (8253). However, other studies found no significant improvement when compared with placebo (17524,46471,90047), although some of these studies may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference (17524,46471). Cranberry products have also been compared with other treatments including antibiotics and probiotics for preventing recurrent UTI, but the results are unclear. A meta-analysis suggests that cranberry products reduce the risk of symptomatic UTIs compared to probiotics. The analysis also showed no difference in the risk of UTI between cranberry products and antibiotics, but the precision of included studies was poor (111407). In one study, taking cranberry extract capsules (Cran-Max; Proprietary Nutritionals, Inc) 500 mg daily for 6 months was as effective as trimethoprim 100 mg daily in elderly females with recurrent UTI (16720). However, taking this same cranberry product twice daily for 12 months was less effective than trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 480 mg once daily in younger premenopausal individuals (17176). Additional research in children with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) shows that daily consumption of cranberry products results in UTI recurrence rates equivalent to those obtained with prophylactic antibiotics. Cranberry juice (Cranberry UR-50, Kikkoman Company) 100 mL daily was equally effective to cefaclor 5-10 mg/kg daily; cranberry syrup (Pharmatoka) 0.2 mL/kg daily was equally effective to trimethoprim 0.2 mL/kg daily (96737).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral cranberry is beneficial for age-related cognitive decline. Oral cranberry may be beneficial for improving visual episodic memory in healthy, elderly adults, but its effects on other aspects of cognition are unclear. Details: A clinical study in healthy adults aged 50-80 years shows that taking a freeze-dried cranberry powder 4.5 grams twice daily (standardized to provide 281 mg proanthocyanidins daily), provided as a sachet and added to food or beverage for 12 weeks, improves visual episodic memory performance during a memory and recall test (Rey Complex Figure Test), but does not appear to affect other measures such as attention, orientation, fluency, language, processing speed, or short-term memory, when compared with placebo (108564). Cranberry supplementation also does not appear to affect grey matter structure; however, due to the low number of patients who completed a baseline and follow-up MRI, this study may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Preliminary clinical research suggests that oral cranberry is beneficial for reducing BPH symptoms. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking powdered dried cranberry fruit 500 mg three times daily for 6 months improves lower urinary symptoms and reduces prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels when compared with no treatment in patients 45 years of age or older with elevated PSA levels, a negative prostate biopsy, and clinically confirmed non-bacterial prostatitis (17126). Another small study in those 45 years of age and older without elevated PSA levels shows that taking a specific dried cranberry powder (Flowens, Naturex-DBS, LLC) 250-500 mg daily for 6 months reduces lower urinary tract symptoms and improves voiding and storage symptoms when compared with placebo (96738).
• Cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral cranberry for cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cranberry for this condition.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although some research suggests that oral cranberry may modestly improve some CVD risk factors, it is unclear if it is beneficial for CVD prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of 10 clinical studies shows that cranberry juice or cranberry extract seems to reduce systolic blood pressure by 3.6 mmHg and body mass index by 0.3 kg/m2 when compared with placebo. However, these improvements are unlikely to be clinically significant, and cranberry does not appear to improve diastolic blood pressure, lipid levels, glycemic control, or waist circumference (102849). The generalizability of these results is limited, as the study populations ranged from healthy adults to those with type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, or coronary heart disease. A clinical crossover study in patients who are overweight or obese and have elevated blood pressure shows that drinking cranberry juice 250 mL twice daily for 8 weeks reduces ambulatory diastolic blood pressure by 2 mmHg during daytime hours, but does not improve systolic blood pressure, glycemic control, or lipid levels, when compared with placebo (108059). The validity of these findings is limited due to short duration of treatment and broad heterogeneity of patient baseline characteristics.
• Catheter-related infections. Although there has been interest in using oral cranberry for catheter-related infections, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cranberry for this condition.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there has been interest in using oral cranberry for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cranberry for this condition.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral cranberry is beneficial for diabetes. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking cranberry supplements orally does not improve fasting serum glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C), fructosamine, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in patients with type 2 diabetes (11328).
• Helicobacter pylori. There is conflicting evidence regarding the use of oral cranberry for Helicobacter pylori eradication, either as a standalone treatment or in combination with standard triple therapy. Details: Two small clinical studies show that taking cranberry juice 480-500 mL, containing 88 mg proanthocyanidins (PACs), daily in two divided doses for 2-3 months can modestly increase the H. pylori eradication rate at 8 weeks, but not at 2 weeks, when compared with placebo. However, the eradication rate was only 20% or less, which is much lower than that obtained with conventional triple therapy (46388,104248). Lower doses, as either cranberry juice or cranberry powder, do not seem to improve H. pylori eradication rates. Cranberry juice containing only 23 mg or 44 mg PACs or cranberry powder containing 36 mg or 72 mg PACs did not demonstrate benefit when compared with placebo (104248). Cranberry juice has also been studied in combination with standard triple therapy. Preliminary clinical research shows that taking cranberry juice 250 mL daily for 3 weeks along with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for one week does not increase the eradication rate when compared with triple therapy plus placebo. However, the combination treatment increased the rate of H. pylori eradication when only females were considered (46439). A meta-analysis of 4 small clinical studies, including three studies already discussed, shows that taking cranberry, either as a juice or a dried powder, does not improve H. pylori eradication rate when compared with placebo, regardless of treatment duration (108060). The validity of these findings is limited by the high heterogeneity of the included studies and incomplete reporting. In asymptomatic children aged 6-16 years old with H. pylori, one clinical study shows that drinking cranberry juice 200 mL, with live or heat-killed Lactobacillus johnsonii 80 mL, daily for 3 weeks eradicates H. pylori in 15% to 22% of patients, compared with 1.5% of those receiving placebo. However, these rates are lower than those typically obtained with conventional triple therapy (46441).
• Hyperlipidemia. Oral cranberry has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Drinking a combination of cranberry, blueberry, apple, and chokeberry juice 300 mL daily for 6 weeks appears to decrease total cholesterol and increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol when compared to baseline in females with overweight or obesity and at least one risk factor for cardiovascular disease (111233). However, the validity of the study is limited by its small size, short duration, and lack of a comparator group. It is unclear if these effects are due to cranberry, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). It is unclear if oral cranberry is beneficial for reducing the risk of kidney stones. Details: Although some preliminary clinical research shows that drinking cranberry juice 500 mL diluted in 1500 mL water daily for 2 weeks can decrease urinary excretion of oxalate in healthy males, which suggests a decreased risk of kidney stone formation (46371), other preliminary clinical research shows that both cranberry juice and concentrated cranberry extracts can increase urinary oxalate levels, suggesting an increased risk of stone formation (7074,46393).
• Memory. It is unclear if oral cranberry is beneficial for memory. Details: Preliminary clinical research in cognitively intact older adults shows that taking cranberry juice 16 ounces twice daily for 6 weeks does not improve memory when compared with placebo (46390).
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral cranberry is beneficial for metabolic syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that drinking cranberry juice 240 mL twice daily for 8 weeks can increase plasma antioxidant capacity when compared with placebo in adults with metabolic syndrome. However, cranberry juice does not appear to affect blood pressure, blood glucose, serum lipids, or markers of inflammation when compared with placebo in these patients (46467).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral cranberry is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with NAFLD shows that adding cranberry extract 288 mg daily to a weight loss diet for 12 weeks does not appear to affect body weight, liver enzymes, lipid levels, or steatosis grade when compared with placebo. Cranberry extract may moderately reduce insulin levels and insulin resistance (104249). However, the clinical impact of these reductions is unclear. Another clinical trial in adults with NAFLD shows that taking dried cranberry powder 144 mg daily after lunch for 6 months improves steatosis grade as measured by ultrasound, insulin sensitivity, and levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides, but does not affect liver enzyme levels, when compared with placebo. All patients also consumed a reduced-calorie diet and an undefined dose of supplemental vitamin E (108058).
• Obesity. Oral cranberry has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in females with overweight or obesity and at least one risk factor for cardiovascular disease shows that drinking a combination of cranberry, blueberry, apple, and chokeberry juice 300 mL daily for 6 weeks does not reduce body weight, body mass index (BMI), or blood pressure but might improve total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol when compared to baseline (111233). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the small study size, short duration, and lack of a comparator group. It is unclear if these effects are due to cranberry, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Overactive bladder. It is unclear if oral cranberry is beneficial for overactive bladder. Details: Preliminary clinical research in otherwise healthy females shows that taking dried cranberry powder 500 mg daily for 24 weeks can reduce daily micturition by 16% and urgency episodes by 57% when compared with placebo. Patients taking cranberry powder also reported an improvement in their own perception of their bladder condition when compared with placebo (104246). Limitations of this study include a short duration, lack of a run-in period, and high drop-out rate, which interfered with the ability to meet power.
• Peristomal lesions. Although there has been interest in using oral cranberry for peristomal lesions, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cranberry for this condition.
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if cranberry is beneficial for preventing prostate cancer recurrence. Details: Clinical research shows that taking cranberry powder (Pacran, Naturex) 1500 mg for a mean of 30 days prior to radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer does not improve prostate tissue markers when compared with taking placebo. However, levels of prostate tissue antigen decreased by approximately 22% when compared with baseline (105127).
• Radiation-induced cystitis. Evidence for the use of cranberry juice in the prevention of radiation-induced cystitis is conflicting. Details:One small clinical study in individuals with prostate cancer shows that taking 200 mg of a cranberry extract standardized to 30% proanthocyanidins (Monoselect Macrocarpon; PharmExtracta) once daily during external beam radiotherapy for 6-7 weeks reduces the risk of lower UTI by 64% when compared with placebo (92579). However, other preliminary clinical research shows that taking cranberry capsules, standardized to contain a total of 72 mg proanthocyanidins, daily during radiation treatment for prostate cancer and for two weeks post-treatment, does not improve pain, burning, nocturia, or urinary flow symptoms from radiation-induced cystitis when compared with a beetroot placebo (104247). Additionally, preliminary clinical research in patients receiving radiotherapy for bladder or cervical cancer shows that consuming cranberry juice 250 mL daily for 2 weeks does not seem to reduce the incidence of UTIs (46469).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if cranberry juice is beneficial in RA. Details: A clinical study in adults with RA shows that drinking reduced-calorie cranberry juice 250 mL twice daily in addition to taking fish oil 1 gram three times daily for 90 days improves disease activity score (DAS28-CRP) when compared with no supplementation. However, this combination was similarly effective to patients taking fish oil alone, suggesting that any benefits may be due to fish oil, as opposed to cranberry juice (108057).
• Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). It is unclear if oral cranberry is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of URTIs. Details: Clinical research shows that drinking a cranberry juice beverage 450 mL daily for 70 days does not decrease the incidence of cold or flu, but may reduce cold and flu symptoms, when compared with placebo in healthy adults (90046).
• Urinary odor. It is unclear if oral cranberry is beneficial for urinary odor. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that cranberry juice cocktail might reduce urinary odors when given orally on a regular basis to patients with urinary incontinence (3333,3334,8254). Cranberry juice cocktail up to 237 mL three times daily for up to 4 weeks has been used (3334). More evidence is needed to rate cranberry for these uses.

(Read more about CRANBERRY)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Hyperlipidemia. Most research shows that taking oral DHA alone or with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) seems to modestly reduce triglyceride levels. However, DHA does not decrease total cholesterol and may increase levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Details: Clinical research shows that taking DHA 1.25-4 grams daily for up to 7 weeks can reduce triglyceride levels by 17% to 24% in adult patients with mild hyperlipidemia, dyslipidemia, or hypertriglyceridemia (6143,48013,48338). Also, taking DHA-enriched fish oil providing DHA 810 mg plus EPA 210 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces triglyceride levels by 23% in premenopausal adults with mild hypertriglyceridemia (99131). Most clinical research suggests that DHA does not decrease total cholesterol (6143,48013,99131). Although some conflicting research exists, most research suggests that DHA modestly increases HDL cholesterol (6143,48013,48338,99131,109216). Most clinical research shows that DHA increases LDL cholesterol by about 8% to 13.6% (6143,48174,48338,109216). However, it may actually decrease levels of small, dense LDL particles (48174). There are conflicting results regarding the effects of DHA on cholesterol levels in children. One preliminary clinical study in children with primary hyperlipidemia shows that taking DHA 500 mg alone or along with EPA does not improve cholesterol levels when compared with control. However, this study was probably too small to detect statistically significant changes (90712). Other research in children aged 9 years and up with familial hypercholesterolemia or familial combined hyperlipidemia shows that taking DHA (DHASCO oil, Martek Biosciences Corp.) 1.2 grams daily for 6 weeks along with the National Cholesterol Education Program Step II (NCEP-II) diet actually increases total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol when compared to following the diet alone (48078,48083). However, some clinical research shows that DHA increases the large buoyant type of LDL particles, but actually decreases the small, dense type (48083).
• Preterm labor. Most research shows that oral DHA seems to prevent preterm labor in those with low DHA status at baseline. Details: A large clinical trial shows that taking DHA 1000 mg daily during pregnancy, starting at 12-20 weeks' gestation and continuing until delivery, results in an early preterm birth rate of 1.7%, compared with 2.4% in those taking DHA 200 mg daily. Benefits were strongest in those with low DHA status at baseline, with no benefit in those with high DHA status at baseline and in those with high adherence to DHA 1000 mg daily (109204,110360). A secondary analysis of two studies shows that taking DHA 800 mg from algal oil or 1000 mg from fish oil modestly reduces the early preterm and preterm birth rates in those with a low DHA status at baseline compared with taking DHA 200 mg (110361). However, conflicting evidence exists. Some clinical research shows that taking DHA during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of preterm delivery. One study has used a specific fish oil supplement (Incromega DHA 500TG) 900 mg containing DHA 800 mg and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)100 mg daily, starting at 20 weeks' gestation and continuing to delivery or 34 weeks' gestation (101505). In another clinical trial, use of a high-DHA fish oil, providing EPA 100 mg and DHA 800 mg daily, from before 20 weeks' until 34 weeks' gestation, increases the risk of preterm birth prior to 34 weeks' gestation when compared with placebo in patients with baseline omega-3 status of greater than 4.9%. However, the risk is reduced from 3.2% to 0.7% in patients with baseline omega-3 status below 4.1%. In addition, taking this high-DHA fish oil had no effect on the risk of preterm birth prior to 37 weeks' gestation (103496). The reasons for any discrepancies may be due to the baseline omega-3 status, the use of algal or fish oil as the source of DHA, and/or the specific timing of preterm labor.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Age-related cognitive decline. Most research shows that taking oral DHA alone or with other ingredients does not slow or improve cognitive decline associated with age. Details: Most clinical research, from individual studies and a meta-analysis, shows that taking DHA orally, alone or with additional eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) for up to 36 months, does not slow or improve age-related cognitive decline (97175,103313). In contrast, results from one large clinical study show that taking DHA 900 mg daily in the absence of EPA for 24 weeks improves episodic memory and visuospatial learning when compared with placebo in patients with age-related cognitive decline. However, DHA did not affect working memory or executive function (90717).
• Alzheimer disease. Taking oral DHA does not seem to slow Alzheimer disease progression. Details: Population research has found that a 0.1 gram per day increment of dietary DHA intake is associated with a 37% reduced risk of Alzheimer disease when taken for 2-21 years (15041,96527). However, a dose-response relationship was not seen, and a correlation between DHA blood concentration and dementia was not seen (96527). Furthermore, clinical research shows that taking DHA 2 grams daily for 18 months does not slow cognitive or functional decline in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease (48290). DHA has also been examined in combination with other ingredients. Preliminary clinical research in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease shows that taking DHA 500 mg, as part of fish 1 gram with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 150 mg, and along with lutein 10 mg, zeaxanthin 2 mg, meso-zeaxanthin 10 mg, and vitamin E 15 mg (Memory Health) daily for 12 months does not affect disease severity when compared with placebo. However, there were modest increases the number of patients experiencing either an improvement or an attenuated decline in memory and mood (109764). The effect of DHA alone is unclear from this study.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Most research shows that taking oral DHA does not improve ADHD symptoms. Details: Low plasma levels of DHA are associated with ADHD in children (7599,15496). Although some preliminary clinical research shows that DHA might improve aggression, emotional problems, and social relationships in children with ADHD (15494,100940), taking DHA 345-500 mg daily or 3.6 grams weekly does not seem to improve objective or subjective measures of ADHD symptoms when compared with placebo (7599,15495,100940).
• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Most research shows that oral DHA does not prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants. Some research suggests that it might increase the risk of BPD in infants born before 29 weeks gestation. Details: One meta-analysis of clinical research in over 3,500 preterm infants shows that administration of EPA and DHA as part of formula or as a direct oral dose, starting within one month of birth, does not increase or decrease the risk for BPD, regardless of the dose of DHA administered (102390). A more recent meta-analysis of four clinical trials limited to infants born less than 29 weeks gestation also shows that administration of DHA at levels of at least 40 mg/kg, or at levels of at least 0.4% total fatty acids in breast milk or formula, does not increase or decrease the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (110359). However, in this latter meta-analysis, when only clinical trials using a more stringent definition of bronchopulmonary dysplasia were included, there was a modest INCREASED risk (110359). Similar findings occurred in a study that was terminated early. This research shows that maternal supplementation with DHA 1.2 grams daily, starting within 72 hours of delivery of infants born before 29 weeks gestation, has no effect on mortality of breastfed infants or survival without BPD at 36 weeks postmenstrual age. However, the occurrence of BPD and severe BPD in surviving infants of mothers taking DHA were increased when compared to those whose mothers took placebo (104559). The conclusions of this study are limited by the early termination, the provision of intravenous DHA-rich lipids to some infants per standard of clinical care, and the increased number of infants born via cesarean delivery to the mothers randomized to DHA. A more recent clinical trial has investigated the inclusion of arachidonic acid in an enteral emulsion providing DHA. One clinical trial in preterm infants born before 29 weeks gestation shows that supplementation with an enteral emulsion containing DHA 50 mg/kg and arachidonic acid 100 mg/kg (Formulaid, DSM Nutritional Products Inc.) until 36 weeks postmenstrual age does not increase the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or other major morbidities compared to control (MCToil, Nutricia) emulsion. Also, infants given the arachidonic acid and DHA required 17 fewer days of respiratory support (110356).
• Cognitive function. Most research shows that oral DHA does not improve cognitive function in healthy adults. Details: Most clinical research shows that taking DHA 250-1000 mg daily for up to 6 months does not improve cognitive function in healthy children, healthy adults, or older females (48194,48216,48266,90668,90708,104560). Also, cognitive function does not seem to be improved when compared with placebo in trials in which omega-3 products containing higher ratios of DHA to eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) were used. These trials have used a specific product (Efamol Ltd) containing DHA 1.16 grams and EPA 0.17 grams daily (90707), DHA 900 mg plus EPA 270 mg (Accelon DHA EE, BASF) daily (109215), or fish oil (Dasbrain, Max Biocare) providing DHA 520 mg or 270 mg daily (109310), for 3 or 6 months in children and adults. However, some clinical research shows that taking algal oil containing DHA 600 mg daily for 16 weeks improves reading scores when compared with placebo in a subgroup of children ages 6-10 years who are below the 20th percentile for reading (90699). However, these results could not be replicated in a later study that included only children below the 20th percentile for reading (98542). The reason for this discrepancy is not clear. Taking DHA does not appear to improve reading scores in children at or above the 20th percentile for reading, and there does not appear to be any benefit of DHA on working memory in any children (90699).
• Cystic fibrosis. Most research shows that oral DHA does not improve symptoms of cystic fibrosis. Details: Clinical research in infants, children, and young adults with cystic fibrosis shows that taking DHA (DHA-basic, CASEN Fleet SLU) 50 mg/kg daily for 48 weeks does not improve spirometry measures, reduce Pseudomonas aeruginosa primary infections, or reduce the number of, or time to, total or severe pulmonary exacerbations when compared with placebo (109217). Also, small clinical studies show that taking DHA 70 mg/kg daily for 6 weeks, or 100 mg/kg daily for one month and then 1 gram daily for 11 months, does not improve lung function or overall health in patients with cystic fibrosis (48119,90665).
• Depression. Most research shows that oral DHA does not improve depression, regardless of the type. Details: Taking DHA orally does not seem to relieve symptoms of major depression, peripartum depression, or postpartum depression in most patients (10869,48030,48238,90680,90691,90692,89353,102391). Also, taking DHA for two weeks prior to the start of interferon-alpha therapy does not appear to prevent depression during interferon-alpha treatment in patients with hepatitis C, although it may delay depression onset by about 6 weeks (90710).
• Macrosomia. Taking oral DHA during pregnancy does not seem to prevent fetal macrosomia. Details: Clinical research in overweight or obese individuals shows that taking DHA (S-oil, DSM Nutritional Products) 800 mg daily, starting before 15 weeks' gestation and continuing until delivery, with or without dietary counselling, does not reduce the incidence of macrosomia when compared with taking DHA 200 mg daily (109218).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral DHA has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Increased dietary consumption of DHA is associated with a decreased risk of AMD (10324). Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a combination of DHA 280 mg, lutein 12 mg, and zeaxanthin 0.6 mg daily for one year increases macular pigment optical density by 31% when compared with placebo in patients with AMD. Increased macular pigment optical density is associated with improve vision performance and a reduced risk of AMD (90678). However, other clinical research suggests that adding DHA plus EPA to an AREDS formula, with or without lutein and zeaxanthin, does not reduce the time to development of AMD or vision loss in patients at high risk of progression to advanced AMD when compared with the AREDS formula alone (60281).
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there has been interest in using oral DHA for allergic rhinitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of DHA for this condition.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if adding DHA to infant formula prevents atopic dermatitis. Details: Evidence from an observational, open-label study shows that giving full-term infants formula with added DHA 17 mg/100 kcal and arachidonic acid 34 mg/100 kcal (Enfamil Premium 1 and Enfamil Premium 2, Mead Johnson Nutrition) as needed for 12 months does not prevent the development of eczema when compared to control formulas without DHA and arachidonic acid (92505).
• Atopic disease. It is unclear if oral DHA during pregnancy prevents atopic disease in the infant. Details: Clinical research shows that supplementation with DHA during pregnancy may modestly protect against some respiratory symptoms in the infants of atopic mothers. Prenatal supplementation with DHA 400 mg, taken daily from 18-22 weeks gestation until delivery, reduces the incidence of phlegm with nasal discharge or nasal congestion in the infant by the age of 18 months by approximately 22% and the incidence of fever with phlegm and nasal discharge or nasal congestion in the infant by approximately 47% when compared with placebo (90676). However, it is unclear if these symptoms are due to atopy or infections.
• Atrial fibrillation. Oral DHA has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Population research suggests that adipose tissue levels of DHA are not associated with a decreased risk of atrial fibrillation (90700). However, clinical research suggests that taking 2 grams per day of a combination of DHA plus EPA (2:1 ratio), starting 7 days before cardiac surgery and continuing until hospital discharge, reduces the relative risk of post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation by 72% when compared with placebo. These patients also received vitamin C 1 gram daily plus vitamin E 400 IU daily, starting 2 days prior to surgery and continuing until discharge (90701).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for autism. Details: One preliminary clinical study shows that taking DHA 200 mg daily for 6 months does not improve autism symptoms in children and may even worsen some behaviors (90713). Another preliminary clinical study in children and adults with autism shows that taking a specific product (SUNTGA40S, Aravita, Suntory Ltd) containing DHA, arachidonic acid, and astaxanthin daily for 16 weeks does not improve overall symptoms when compared with placebo, although the combination product may improve certain symptoms such as social withdrawal or social communication (90716).
• Behcet disease. Although there has been interest in using oral DHA for Behcet disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of DHA for this condition.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for bipolar disorder in adults. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking DHA 1250 mg daily for 12 weeks does not improve cognitive function when compared with placebo in patients with bipolar disorder (103312).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for breast cancer treatment or prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between dietary fatty acid intake, including DHA, and the risk of breast cancer (96528). The effect of DHA supplementation on breast cancer risk is unknown. Some early research has investigated the effects of DHA in patients with breast cancer. Preliminary clinical research shows that taking DHA (DHASCO, Martek Biosciences Corp.) 600 mg three times daily for 7-10 days prior to chemotherapy initiation, and then for 5 months during chemotherapy, induces complete or partial response in 44% of breast cancer patients. Patients with a greater increase in DHA levels (at least 2.5%) show a longer time to progression and longer survival when compared to those with a smaller increase in DHA levels (90671).
• Cancer. Taking oral DHA with oral eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) does not seem to decrease the risk of cancer in patients with cardiovascular disease and may actually INCREASE the risk of cancer in females. The effect of DHA alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research suggests that taking a combination of EPA 400 mg plus DHA 200 mg, with or without B vitamins, for a median of 4.7 years does not reduce the risk of cancer in middle-aged and elderly patients with cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, this combination appears to increase the risk of cancer in females (90666).
• Child development. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for child development. However, due to the lack of significant safety concerns and the possibility of some cognitive benefit, many experts recommend DHA 200 mg daily during pregnancy. Details: Clinical research shows that giving infants DHA-supplemented formula during infancy does not appear to improve language and school readiness by the age of 2-3.5 years, or improve neurodevelopment by the age of 6 years (90674,92503). In addition, most research suggests that DHA supplementation during pregnancy, occasionally continuing postpartum for 6 months, does not affect visual acuity, attention, working memory, behavior and most other measures of neurodevelopment by 1-7 years of age (48095,48285,48293,90679,90690,94600,96522,109219). There is some evidence to suggest that maternal supplementation with DHA 400 mg daily from 16 weeks gestation until delivery may reduce the risk of poor language development in the infant at age 14 and 18 months and the risk of lower visual acuity at 2 months when compared with placebo (90694); however, this benefit did not have lasting effects at 5-6 years of age (99133).
• Cognitive impairment. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for cognitive impairment in the elderly. Details: Clinical research shows that taking DHA 800 mg daily, alone or with folic acid 800 mcg daily for 6 months, modestly improves some measures of cognitive function when compared with placebo in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment (103978). Also, taking a specific product (Vayacog, Enzymotec Ltd.) providing phosphatidylserine 300 mg, DHA about 59 mg, and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) about 20 mg daily for 15 weeks improves verbal immediate recall when compared with placebo (94665). However, other research in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment disagrees. One clinical trial shows that taking DHA 1491 mg plus EPA 351 mg daily for 12 months does not improve cognitive measures when compared with placebo (109220). In addition, taking DHA along with EPA and other ingredients for up to 24 weeks does not significantly improve memory, forgetfulness, or other measures of cognition in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment (90704,94665). Also, a small clinical study shows that taking DHA 720 mg daily along with EPA and other ingredients for 12 weeks does not significantly improve memory, forgetfulness, or other measures of cognition (62847).
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for CHD. Details: Increased dietary consumption of DHA may reduce the risk of death in patients with CHD (10322). However, the effect of DHA supplements is unclear.
• Crohn disease. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for Crohn disease prevention. Details: Population research suggests that increased dietary intake of DHA is associated with a reduced risk of Crohn disease (90673).
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for dementia prevention. Details: Population research has found that a 0.1 gram per day increment of dietary DHA intake is associated with a 14% reduced risk of dementia when taken for 2-21 years. However, a dose-response relationship was not seen, and a correlation between DHA blood concentration and dementia was not seen (96527).
• Developmental coordination disorder (DCD). Oral DHA has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study in children with DCD shows that taking a tuna fish oil product providing DHA 480 mg daily for 4 months, in combination with evening primrose oil providing arachidonic acid 35 mg and gamma-linolenic acid 96 mg, thyme oil 24 mg, and vitamin E 80 mg (Efalex, Efamol Ltd.), modestly decreases movement disorders as determined by objective measures when compared with baseline (5708). It is unclear if these benefits are due to DHA, other ingredients, or the combination. Also, the validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for glycemic control or the prevention of type 1 or gestational diabetes. Details: A small clinical study in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking DHA orally does not improve levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or decrease blood sugar or glycated hemoglobin. However, triglyceride levels are reduced (10321). DHA has also been evaluated for the prevention of gestational or type 1 diabetes. Clinical research in overweight or obese individuals shows that taking DHA (S-oil, DSM Nutritional Products) 800 mg daily, starting before 15 weeks' gestation and continuing until delivery, with or without dietary counselling, does not reduce the incidence of gestational diabetes when compared with taking DHA 200 mg daily (109218). Additionally, population research suggests that maternal serum levels of DHA are not associated with the risk of childhood onset of type 1 diabetes (90705).
• Diabetic retinopathy. Oral DHA has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with diabetic macular edema related to diabetic retinopathy receiving ranibizumab shows that taking a combination supplement containing DHA 1050 mg daily along with other free fatty acids, minerals, and vitamins (Brudyretina, Brudy Lab S.L.) for 2 years reduces macular thickness, but not visual acuity, when compared with ranibizumab alone. The effect of DHA alone is unknown (96526).
• Diarrhea. It is unclear if infant formula containing DHA is beneficial for diarrhea prevention. Details: Preliminary clinical research suggests that giving full-term infants formula with added DHA 17 mg/100 kcal and arachidonic acid 34 mg/100 kcal (Enfamil Premium 1 and Enfamil Premium 2, Mead Johnson Nutrition) as needed for 12 months reduces the incidence of diarrhea requiring medical attention when compared to control formulas (92505).
• Dyslexia. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for improving night vision in children with this condition. Details: One small clinical study in children with dyslexia shows that taking fish oils rich in DHA, providing 480 mg daily for one month, seem to develop significantly better dark adaptation when compared with controls (5708).
• Dysmenorrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral DHA for dysmenorrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of DHA for this condition.
• Fractures. Oral DHA has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study shows that taking omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, providing DHA 660 mg and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 330 mg, for 3 years does not prevent fractures in adults over 70 years of age when compared with placebo. These findings were consistent in adults taking omega-3 fatty acids alone or combined with vitamin D 2000 IU daily and/or strength training three times weekly (104619).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for reducing blood pressure in adults or if prenatal supplementation reduces blood pressure in children. Details: Clinical research shows that taking DHA-enriched canola oil containing 63% oleic acid and 6% DHA for 4 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure by 3% and diastolic blood pressure by 4% when compared to baseline in adults with at least one cardiovascular risk factor (26466). A meta-analysis of clinical research in adults with dyslipidemia shows that supplemental DHA reduces diastolic, but not systolic, blood pressure when compared with control (102389). A large clinical study shows that taking omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, providing DHA 660 mg and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 330 mg, for 3 years does not reduce blood pressure levels in adults over 70 years of age when compared with placebo. These findings were consistent in adults taking omega-3 fatty acids alone or combined with vitamin D 2000 IU daily and/or strength training three times weekly. About 39% of the individuals included in this study were diagnosed with hypertension and about 50% were using antihypertensives (104619). The effect of DHA alone on blood pressure levels in a population of adults with diagnosed hypertension is unclear. Prenatal supplementation with DHA has also been evaluated for the prevention of hypertension in children. A secondary analysis of a large clinical trial shows that overweight children or children with obesity whose mothers took DHA 600 mg daily, starting at about 14.5 weeks' gestation and continuing until birth, have lower diastolic and systolic blood pressure at 5 years of age when compared with those whose mothers took placebo. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were reduced by about 4 mm Hg and 5 mm Hg, respectively, in the children exposed to DHA during pregnancy when compared with those exposed to placebo. The blood pressure of the children exposed to DHA during pregnancy was similar to that of children with normal weight (98891). Results of this study are limited by the fact that confounding factors, such as shorter duration of breast-feeding and increased sodium intake for children with obesity in the placebo group, may have also contributed to differences in blood pressure. It is unclear if this reduction in elevated blood pressure during childhood reduces the risk of hypertension in adulthood.
• IgA nephropathy. Although there has been interest in using oral DHA for IgA nephropathy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of DHA for this condition.
• Infant development. Infant supplementation with DHA does not seem to improve development. Also, most evidence shows that maternal supplementation with DHA is not beneficial for infant cognitive development. However, due to the lack of significant safety concerns and the possibility of some cognitive benefit, many experts recommend DHA 200 mg daily during pregnancy. Details: Most clinical research shows that giving healthy, full-term infants formula supplemented with DHA 0.32% to 0.96% modestly improves measures of visual acuity at 2, 4, and 12 months of age when compared with standard infant formula (14403,15003,47980,48355,90670). However, formula supplemented with DHA 0.15% does not appear to improve visual acuity by about 12 months when given to preterm infants (48008). There is some evidence that giving healthy, full-term infants DHA-supplemented formula during infancy might improve language comprehension and development, as well as fine motor skills, by the age of 12-14 months when compared with standard formula (48247,48356). However, most clinical research, including meta-analyses of high-quality clinical trials, shows that giving infants formula supplemented with DHA during infancy does not improve overall cognition or motor skills at 12-14 months of age, regardless of DHA dosing or prematurity status (48247,48356,89363). Experts generally recommend breast-feeding as the preferred feeding method over DHA-supplemented formula; however, if formula is used, some experts suggest a formula providing at least 0.2% of lipids from DHA (14403). Some population research suggests that higher maternal DHA levels are associated with improved use of gestures and problem solving in infants (90709,99132). However, population research suggests that higher maternal DHA levels also appear to be associated with worsening mental development (90709), and most clinical research shows that maternal ingestion of DHA has little effect on fetal or infant development. Maternal ingestion of DHA 33-133 mg daily from an egg source or 400 mg daily from an algal-based source does not seem to significantly increase weight, length, or head circumference at birth (14395,48286). Also, maternal ingestion of DHA 200-400 mg daily from week 15-22 of pregnancy until term does not significantly improve visual or auditory development in term infants (14393,90706). A small clinical trial shows that taking DHA 1440 mg daily from fish oil also providing eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 260 mg, from 22-24 weeks gestation until delivery, does not improve most measures of developmental or behavioral milestones in the infant at 6 months, when compared with olive oil placebo (110354). In addition, most research suggests that DHA supplementation during pregnancy, occasionally continuing postpartum for 6 months, does not affect growth to age 18 months or visual acuity, attention, working memory, behavior and most other measures of neurodevelopment by 1-7 years of age (48095,48285,48293,90679,90690,94600,96522,109219). However, there is some evidence to suggest that maternal supplementation with DHA 214 mg daily may improve infant sleep patterning on the first day of life (90687). Also, maternal supplementation with DHA 400 mg daily from 16 weeks gestation until delivery may reduce the risk of poor language development in the infant at age 14 and 18 months and the risk of lower visual acuity at 2 months when compared with placebo (90694). However, this benefit did not have lasting effects at 5-6 years of age (99133).
• Intraventricular hemorrhage. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for preventing intraventricular hemorrhage in premature infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in infants born before 29 weeks gestation shows that supplementation with an enteral emulsion containing DHA 50 mg/kg and arachidonic acid 100 mg/kg (Formulaid, DSM Nutritional Products Inc.) until 36 weeks postmenstrual age has no effect on the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage when compared with a control emulsion (110356).
• Keratoconus. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for improving vision in people with keratoconus. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with early to advanced keratoconus shows that taking DHA 1000 mg daily for 3 months does not improve corneal thickness, measurements of corneal curve, or most other ophthalmological measures when compared with taking no DHA (110358).
• Lower respiratory tract infections. It is unclear if formula containing DHA is beneficial for preventing lower respiratory tract infections in infants. Details: Clinical research shows that giving preterm infants formula or breast milk containing high-dose DHA (1% of fatty acids) does not prevent hospitalizations due to bronchiolitis and other lower respiratory tract conditions when compared with giving breast milk or formula containing 0.35% DHA (90667). However, preliminary clinical research shows that giving full-term infants formula with added DHA 17 mg/100 kcal and arachidonic acid 34 mg/100 kcal (Enfamil Premium 1 and Enfamil Premium 2, Mead Johnson Nutrition) as needed for 12 months reduces the risk of bronchiolitis and croup when compared with control formulas (92505).
• Male infertility. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for improving fertility. Details: Clinical research shows that taking DHA (NuaDHA, Nua Biological Innovations SL) 0.5, 1, or 2 grams daily for 3 months increases progressive sperm motility by 24% to 30% when compared with placebo in men with a history of infertility. The greatest effects were seen in men with asthenozoospermia, with an overall effect of 35 (99134). It is unclear if the effects of DHA on sperm function correlate with increased fertility rates.
• Metabolic syndrome. Although there has been interest in using oral DHA for metabolic syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of DHA for this condition.
• Migraine headache. Although there has been interest in using oral DHA for migraine headache, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of DHA for this condition.
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for increasing muscle strength. Details: A large clinical study shows that taking omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, providing DHA 660 mg and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 330 mg, for 3 years does not increase muscle strength in adults over 70 years of age when compared with placebo. These findings were consistent in adults taking omega-3 fatty acids alone or combined with vitamin D 2000 IU daily and/or strength training three times weekly (104619).
• Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for preventing NEC in preterm infants. Details: Clinical research in preterm infants shows that providing DHA (Neuromins for Kids life's DHA; DSM Nutritional Products Inc.) 75 mg/kg for 14 days from the first enteral feed reduces the risk of confirmed NEC by 7% when compared with a control oil. Treatment of 15 infants with DHA would be needed to prevent one case of NEC (109213). However, preliminary clinical research shows that maternal supplementation with DHA 1.2 grams daily, starting within 72 hours of delivery of infants born before 29 weeks' gestation, has no effect on the incidence of NEC in breastfed infants at 36 weeks postmenstrual age when compared with placebo (104559). Other preliminary clinical research in infants born before 29 weeks gestation shows that supplementation with an enteral emulsion containing DHA 50 mg/kg and arachidonic acid 100 mg/kg (Formulaid, DSM Nutritional Products Inc.) until 36 weeks postmenstrual age has no effect on the incidence of NEC when compared with a control emulsion (110356).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking DHA (Martek Biosciences Corporation) 250-500 mg daily for 6-24 months reduces the risk of severe liver steatosis when compared with placebo in children with NAFLD (48295,90695,90696).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for improving weight loss in overweight or obese adults. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking 2.8 grams daily of an oil emulsion containing approximately 46% DHA for 12 weeks decreases carbohydrate and fat intake, but does not reduce body weight or improve body composition, when compared with placebo in overweight or obese adults (90681).
• Otitis media. It is unclear if DHA in infant formula is beneficial for preventing otitis media in infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that giving full-term infants formula with added DHA 17 mg/100 kcal and arachidonic acid 34 mg/100 kcal (Enfamil Premium 1 and Enfamil Premium 2, Mead Johnson Nutrition) for 12 months does not prevent the development of ear infection when compared with control formulas (92505).
• Phenylketonuria (PKU). It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for PKU. Details: Children with PKU consume very low amounts of DHA. Clinical research shows that taking DHA up to approximately 7 mg/kg daily for 6 months improves DHA status, but not neurological function, in children aged 5-13 years with PKU (99631). The effect of higher doses of DHA, or the effect of DHA supplementation on neurological function in younger children with PKU, have not been determined.
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for increasing physical performance in older adults. Details: A large clinical study shows that taking omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, providing DHA 660 mg and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 330 mg, for 3 years does not improve physical performance in adults over 70 years of age when compared with placebo. These findings were consistent in adults taking omega-3 fatty acids alone or combined with vitamin D 2000 IU daily and/or strength training three times weekly (104619).
• Postoperative pain. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for reducing postoperative analgesic use. Details: A post-hoc analysis shows that enteral DHA 75 mg/kg administered perioperatively to infants born at greater than 34 weeks gestation who are undergoing cardiac surgery reduces the cumulative analgesic dose and shortens the duration of buprenorphine during the postoperative period when compared with placebo. However, the use of fentanyl or ketorolac were not reduced (96524).
• Prematurity. It is unclear if oral DHA during lactation or early in infancy is beneficial for increasing growth or neurodevelopment of the premature infant. Details: Clinical research in lactating individuals who delivered prior to 29 weeks' gestation shows that taking DHA 1.2 grams daily, starting within 72 hours of delivery and continuing until the infant reached 36 weeks postmenstrual age, might have beneficial effects on the growth of female infants, but not male infants, when compared with placebo. Weight velocity and weight gain were significantly increased in the female infants, with a weight gain of 52.6 grams. However, weight gain and weight velocity were not improved in the male infants, and weight at 36 weeks postmenstrual age was 89 grams less than those whose mothers took placebo (109221). In addition, there was no improvement in neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months corrected age (110364). Other clinical research in infants born before 29 weeks' gestation shows that giving enteral DHA 60 mg/kg daily until 36 weeks corrected gestational age does not improve most measures of intelligence at 5 years when compared with placebo (110363).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Observational research has found that higher consumption of DHA is associated with a reduced risk of total, advanced, and aggressive prostate cancer when compared to lower consumption of DHA (12961,25937). However, a meta-analysis of multiple population studies has found that higher DHA blood levels are associated with a 2.5-fold higher risk of aggressive prostate cancer, but not low-grade prostate cancer, when compared with lower blood percentages of DHA (25936). Another meta-analysis of population research has found that a higher blood level of DHA is associated with a slight increased risk of non-aggressive prostate cancer (90677).
• Psoriasis. Although there has been interest in using oral DHA for psoriasis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of DHA for this condition.
• Raynaud syndrome. Although there has been interest in using oral DHA for Raynaud syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of DHA for this condition.
• Restenosis. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for preventing restenosis in people with stents. Details: Observational research has found that initiation of statin therapy in patients receiving stent placement after an acute coronary event is associated with a reduction in DHA levels. These reductions in DHA are associated with a greater prevalence of in-stent restenosis. From these results, researchers postulate that patients newly started on a statin after stent placement for acute coronary syndrome might benefit from DHA supplementation (100939). However, the effect of DHA supplementation is unknown.
• Retinitis pigmentosa. Evidence for the use of oral DHA for retinitis pigmentosa is inconsistent and contradictory. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking DHA 1200 mg daily for 4 years does not improve eye function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa who are also taking vitamin A when compared with placebo (48070). Also, taking DHA 600-3600 mg daily for 4 years does not maintain rod or cone function in boys or men with retinitis pigmentosa when compared with placebo (90683). However, a report of ancillary outcomes from this study shows that taking DHA might slow the rate of decline in final dark-adapted thresholds and visual field sensitivity in these patients (95738). Also, some research shows that taking DHA 400 mg daily for 4 years does maintain rod and cone function in some patients, although visual function is not improved when compared with placebo (48057,48115).
• Retinopathy of prematurity. It is unclear if maternal or infant supplementation with oral DHA is beneficial for preventing retinopathy of prematurity. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that maternal supplementation with DHA 1.2 grams daily, starting within 72 hours of delivery of infants born before 29 weeks gestation, has no effect on the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity in breastfed infants at 36 weeks postmenstrual age when compared with placebo (104559). Other preliminary clinical research in infants born before 29 weeks gestation shows that supplementation with an enteral emulsion containing DHA 50 mg/kg and arachidonic acid 100 mg/kg (Formulaid, DSM Nutritional Products Inc.) until 36 weeks postmenstrual age has no effect on the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity when compared with a control emulsion (110356).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although there has been interest in using oral DHA for RA, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of DHA for this condition.
• Schizophrenia. Oral DHA has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking EPA 1000 mg, DHA 500 mg, and alpha-lipoic acid 150 mg twice daily for up to 2 years after discontinuing antipsychotic treatment does not prevent relapse in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophreniform disorder (90675).
• Sepsis. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for preventing sepsis in premature infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that maternal supplementation with DHA 1.2 grams daily, starting within 72 hours of delivery of infants born before 29 weeks gestation, has no effect on the incidence of sepsis in breastfed infants at 36 weeks postmenstrual age when compared with placebo (104559). Other preliminary clinical research in infants born before 29 weeks gestation shows that supplementation with an enteral emulsion containing DHA 50 mg/kg and arachidonic acid 100 mg/kg (Formulaid, DSM Nutritional Products Inc.) until 36 weeks postmenstrual age has no effect on the incidence of sepsis when compared with a control emulsion (110356).
• Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for SCA. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with SCA shows that taking DHA 600 mg daily for 16 weeks reduces ataxia and improves cerebellar hypometabolism upon brain imaging when compared with placebo. These beneficial effects are sustained when DHA is taken for an additional 40 weeks (96525).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral DHA is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Population research has found that serum DHA levels may be associated with a reduced risk of ischemic stroke, as well as any specific type of ischemic stroke, including cardioembolic stroke, atherothrombotic stroke, and lacunar stroke (90715).
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although there has been interest in using oral DHA for SLE, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of DHA for this condition.
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) nephritis. Although there has been interest in using oral DHA for SLE nephritis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of DHA for this condition.
• Ulcerative colitis. Although there has been interest in using oral DHA for ulcerative colitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of DHA for this condition.
• Vascular dementia. It is unclear if DHA is beneficial for improving dementia severity. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with vascular dementia shows that taking DHA 0.72 grams daily for one year improves dementia severity based on the Hasegawa's Dementia Rating Scale and Mini-Mental State Examination Scale scores when compared to baseline (47940). More evidence is needed to rate DHA for these uses.

(Read more about DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACID (DHA))

EFFECTIVE

• Hypertriglyceridemia. Oral prescription ethyl-EPA 4 grams daily reduces triglyceride levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, especially in severe cases. It is unclear if oral EPA supplements are beneficial in hypertriglyceridemia. Details: A specific ethyl-EPA product (Vascepa, formerly ARM101, Amarin) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be used at a dose of 4 grams daily with diet modification to reduce triglyceride levels in adult patients with severe (≥ 500 mg/dL) hypertriglyceridemia. Clinical research shows that taking 4 grams daily in two divided doses for 12 weeks reduces triglyceride levels by 33%, total cholesterol by 16%, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol by 29%, and apolipoprotein B by 9% when compared with placebo (91410). In patients taking statins with persistent elevated triglyceride levels (between 200 mg/dL and 500 mg/dL), this prescription product reduces triglyceride levels by about 22% and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by about 6% when compared with placebo (91409). In females with diabetes taking statins with persistent elevated triglyceride levels, this product reduces triglyceride levels by about 21.5% and total cholesterol levels by 12.5%, but does not reduce levels of LDL cholesterol when compared with placebo (99136). Furthermore, a large clinical trial (REDUCE-IT) in patients with LDL cholesterol levels controlled with statin therapy, but with persistent elevated triglyceride levels and other cardiovascular risk factors, shows that this product reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events by 25% when compared with placebo after a median follow-up of 4.9 years. The number of these patients needed to be treated to prevent one major adverse cardiovascular event is 21 (95715). Preliminary clinical research in patients with hypertriglyceridemia also shows that taking a specific self-emulsifying ethyl-EPA (MND-2119, Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) 2 grams or 4 grams once daily for 52 weeks reduces levels of triglycerides by 16.7% and 21.0%, respectively, compared with baseline (110365). This study is uncontrolled and open-label. There is no strong evidence that EPA SUPPLEMENTS reduce triglyceride levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral prescription ethyl-EPA seems to reduce the risk of CVD events when used as an adjunct to statin therapy in patients with CVD risk. It is unclear if oral EPA supplements are beneficial in CVD. Details: A specific ethyl EPA product (Vascepa, Amarin) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be used as an adjunct to statin therapy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction and stroke in adult patients with elevated triglycerides (≥ 150 mg/dL) and CVD or diabetes mellitus and at least two additional risk factors for CVD (101286). This approval was mostly due to evidence from a large clinical trial (REDUCE-IT). For patients in the REDUCE-IT trial on statin therapy with persistent elevated triglyceride levels and other cardiovascular risk factors, taking Vascepa 4 grams daily reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events by 25% when compared to placebo after a median follow-up of 4.9 years. To prevent one major cardiovascular event, 21 patients need to be treated (95715). There is no strong evidence that EPA SUPPLEMENTS reduce CVD risk in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.
• Depression. Oral EPA seems to reduce symptoms of depression, especially in patients already being treated with conventional antidepressants. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that pure EPA or omega-3 fatty acid enriched in EPA (at least 60%) moderately reduces depressive symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and those with depressive symptomatology but no diagnosis of MDD (90680,66129,102391). The beneficial effect of EPA appears to be dose-dependent in patients with MDD but not in those with depressive symptomatology (90680). The duration of treatment and the age of the patients do not appear to influence the effects of EPA (66129). Patients already being treated with conventional antidepressant medications may benefit more from EPA than those not taking antidepressants. Preliminary clinical research shows that taking ethyl-EPA orally 500 mg to 1 gram twice daily with standard therapy improves symptoms of recurrent major depression, such as depressed mood, guilty feelings, worthlessness, and insomnia, after 2-4 weeks of treatment (10215,10872). A 1 gram per day dose of ethyl-EPA may be more effective for depression than 2 grams per day (10215). However, in patients not using standard therapy, taking EPA-enriched omega-3 fatty acid (ProEPA Xtra, NordicNaturals) standardized to contain EPA 1060 mg and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 274 mg daily for 8 weeks does not reduce symptoms of depression in patients with MDD (90691). Some research suggests that EPA may help prevent the development of major depression in patients treated with interferon-alpha. Clinical research shows that only 10% of patients taking EPA 3.5 grams daily for 2 weeks prior to the start of interferon-alpha therapy experience major depression during the 24 weeks of interferon-alpha treatment compared to 30% of patients taking placebo. Also, the onset of depression is delayed from approximately 5.3 weeks to 12 weeks (90710). Based on these and other findings, Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that omega-3 fatty acids providing 1-2 grams EPA are recommended for adjunctive use in patients with major depressive disorder. However, omega-3 fatty acids are not recommended as monotherapy and products containing other doses of EPA are not recommended as adjunctive or monotherapy in these patients (110318).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral prescription ethyl-EPA reduces the risk of MI when used as an adjunct to statin therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Oral EPA supplements also seem to be beneficial for this purpose. Details: A specific ethyl-EPA product (Vascepa, Amarin) 4 grams daily is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be used as an adjunct to statin therapy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction and stroke in adult patients with elevated triglycerides (≥ 150 mg/dL) and CVD or diabetes mellitus and at least two additional risk factors for CVD (101286). The effects of EPA SUPPLEMENTS for MI are less clear. Clinical research in patients with acute MI shows that taking EPA 1.8 grams daily along with pitavastatin 2 mg daily for one month starting within 24 hours of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces the incidence of adverse cardiac events, including cardiac death, stroke, re-infarction, ventricular arrhythmias, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, by 64% when compared with pitavastatin alone. In particular, the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias is reduced by about 66% for patients treated with EPA plus pitavastatin compared to pitavastatin alone (91411). Taking this same dose of EPA along with the same dose of pitavastatin for one year after PCI in patients with acute MI also reduces the absolute risk of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, or coronary revascularization by 11% when compared to pitavastatin alone. The reduction in cardiovascular events after one year was largely due to a decrease in cardiovascular deaths by about 6% (96420). There is also evidence that taking EPA 1.8 grams daily along with pitavastatin 4 mg daily for 6-8 months following PCI for acute coronary syndrome reduces plaque lipid volume by 20% when compared to pitavastatin alone (96419). One clinical study also shows that taking EPA 0.9 grams twice daily along with statins for one month prior to undergoing PCI might reduce the incidence of periprocedural (type IV) MI by approximately 25% when compared to statins alone (91412).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for AMD prevention. Details: Population research suggests that increased dietary consumption of EPA does not prevent AMD (10324).
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there has been interest in using oral EPA for allergic rhinitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of EPA for this condition.
• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for Alzheimer disease prevention. Details: Population research suggests that higher dietary intake of EPA is not associated with a decreased risk of developing Alzheimer disease (15041).
• Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral EPA for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of EPA for this condition.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Although there has been interest in using oral EPA for atopic dermatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of EPA for this condition.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for ADHD treatment or prevention. Details: Some research shows that low plasma levels of EPA and other fatty acids are associated with ADHD in children (15496); however, it is not known if taking EPA supplements can treat or prevent ADHD.
• Behcet disease. Although there has been interest in using oral EPA for Behcet disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of EPA for this condition.
• Bipolar disorder. Oral fish oil in doses providing 1-2 grams EPA may be beneficial for symptoms of depression in patients with bipolar disorder. It is unclear if EPA alone is beneficial. Details: Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that omega-3 fatty acids in doses standardized to 1-2 grams EPA are weakly recommended for adjunctive use in bipolar depression (110318). This recommendation is based mainly on an early meta-analysis of clinical research of various omega-3 sources (66126). Three clinical trials in this meta-analysis examined the effect of EPA alone in patients with bipolar disorder (110366,110367,110368), with only one study in patients also using stable routine treatment examining the effect of ethyl-EPA 1 gram or 2 grams daily for 12 weeks showing benefit on symptoms of depression, but not mania (110366). The largest clinical trial in patients with bipolar disorder shows that taking ethyl-EPA 6 grams daily for 4 months does not improve symptoms of depression or mania (110368). These findings suggest an unclear effect of ethyl-EPA on symptoms of depression, with no evidence of support for improving symptoms of mania. Also, theoretically, fish oil, a source of EPA in some clinical trials, might increase symptoms of mania in patients with bipolar disorder. Cases of hypomania have been reported in patients with bipolar disorder using fish oil (5713,7202).
• Borderline personality disorder. It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for improving symptoms of borderline personality disorder. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking ethyl-EPA 1 gram orally daily for 8 weeks modestly improves aggressive behavior and depression in patients with moderately severe borderline personality disorder when compared with placebo (10348).
• Cachexia. It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for maintaining lean body mass in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Details: In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, taking an oral nutritional supplement containing EPA (ProSure, Abbott Nutrition) 2 grams daily while undergoing chemotherapy modestly increases lean body mass by 1.6 kg, on average, compared with a 2 kg LOSS of lean body mass with an isocaloric nutritional supplement (91413). In patients with head and neck cancer, starting EPA 2 grams daily along with a polymeric diet prior to chemotherapy and continuing for 6 weeks results in weight and lean body mass maintenance when compared with baseline. However, this maintenance did not differ statistically from losses of 2.1 kg and 1.3 kg, respectively, in patients using the polymeric diet without EPA (99135). A meta-analysis of eight studies in cancer patients shows that taking EPA, usually alone in doses of 1.5-2.2 grams daily for 4-6 weeks, does not seem to prevent loss of lean body mass when compared with placebo. However, it is unclear how many of the included patients had malnutrition and/or weight loss (106070). Also, this analysis included two studies in which EPA was combined with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in fish oil.
• Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for preventing diarrhea during treatment with chemotherapy. Details: In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, taking an oral nutritional supplement containing EPA (ProSure, Abbott Nutrition) 2 grams daily while undergoing chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin/carboplatin does not seem to prevent diarrhea when compared with taking an isocaloric control nutritional supplement (91413).
• Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for preventing nausea and vomiting during treatment with chemotherapy. Details: In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, taking an oral nutritional supplement containing EPA (ProSure, Abbott Nutrition) 2 grams daily while undergoing chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin/carboplatin does not seem to prevent nausea or vomiting when compared with taking an isocaloric control nutritional supplement (91413).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for preventing peripheral neuropathy during treatment with chemotherapy. Details: In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, taking an oral nutritional supplement containing EPA (ProSure, Abbott Nutrition) 2 grams daily while undergoing chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin/carboplatin moderately prevents the development of neuropathy symptoms when compared with taking an isocaloric control nutritional supplement (91413).
• Chemotherapy-related fatigue. It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for preventing fatigue during treatment with chemotherapy. Details: In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, taking an oral nutritional supplement containing EPA (ProSure, Abbott Nutrition) 2 grams daily while undergoing chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin/carboplatin modestly reduces symptoms of fatigue when compared with taking an isocaloric control nutritional supplement (91413).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral EPA alone is beneficial for improving cognitive function. Details: Clinical research in young and middle-aged adults shows that taking an omega-3 supplement providing EPA 900 mg plus docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 360 mg (Accelon EPA EE, BASF) daily for 6 months improves some measures of cognitive function, including overall speed and overall memory-related accuracy, when compared with both placebo or an omega-3 supplement providing DHA 900 mg and EPA 270 mg daily (Accelon DHA EE, BASF). There were no benefits on other measures of cognitive performance (109215).
• Colorectal adenoma. Taking oral EPA with aspirin might reduce the development of new colorectal adenomas. However, it is unclear if oral EPA alone is beneficial. Details: Clinical research in adults determined to be at high risk for colorectal cancer shows that taking EPA 2 grams, with or without aspirin 300 mg, daily for one year does not reduce the rate of adenoma detection during colonoscopy when compared with placebo or aspirin alone. However, the combination of EPA with aspirin seems to reduce the total number of detected adenomas when compared with taking either EPA or aspirin alone (102501).
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). It is unclear if oral EPA alone is beneficial for CHD. Details: Population research suggests that increased dietary consumption of EPA is associated with a modest decrease in the risk of mortality in patients with CHD (10322). Also, preliminary clinical research shows that patients with hypercholesterolemia and a history of CHD who take ethyl-EPA 600 mg three times daily have a 19% reduction in the risk of major coronary events; however, ethyl-EPA doesn't appear to reduce sudden cardiac death (15497).
• Cystic fibrosis. Although there has been interest in using oral EPA for cystic fibrosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of EPA for this condition.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for glycemic control. Details: A small study shows that taking EPA 4 grams daily for 6 weeks does not seem to substantially improve cholesterol, blood sugar, or glycated hemoglobin in patients with type 2 diabetes when compared with placebo. However, triglyceride levels are reduced (10321).
• Dysmenorrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral EPA for dysmenorrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of EPA for this condition.
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral EPA alone is beneficial for preventing exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: Small clinical studies in untrained healthy males show that taking fish oil providing EPA 600 mg and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 260 mg daily for 4-8 weeks prior to exhaustive unaccustomed exercise has beneficial effects on immediate and/or delayed muscle soreness and range of motion when compared with placebo (98257,109222).
• Fractures. Oral EPA has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study shows that taking omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, providing EPA 330 mg and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 660 mg, for 3 years does not prevent fractures in adults over 70 years of age when compared with placebo. These findings were consistent in adults taking omega-3 fatty acids alone or combined with vitamin D 2000 IU daily and/or strength training three times weekly (104619).
• Huntington disease. It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for this condition. Details: A meta-analysis of five clinical studies in adults with Huntington disease shows that taking EPA 1-2 grams daily for 6 months does not improve motor scores or symptoms when compared with placebo. In two clinical studies that continued for an additional 6 months, EPA supplementation improved total motor score at 12 months. However, the validity of this finding is confounded because the largest clinical trial included in this analysis converted to an open-label design after the first 6 months, eliminating the placebo control and introducing the risk for patient and investigator bias (102505).
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for improving lipid levels. Details: Small clinical trials shows that taking EPA alone reduces serum triglyceride concentrations, but has no effect on total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in mildly hypercholesterolemic males (6143,10322). The effect of EPA on cholesterol levels in other populations has also been evaluated. In patients with type 2 diabetes, EPA can increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by approximately 12% (10321). In normolipidemic individuals, an algal oil enriched in EPA reduced levels of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and total cholesterol but had no effect on triglyceride or LDL cholesterol levels (103314). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking EPA modestly decreases total and LDL cholesterol levels when compared with placebo (109216). However, not all patients in these studies had hyperlipidemia, and EPA was usually provided in oils that also include docosahexaenoic acid.
• Hypertension. Small clinical studies suggest that oral EPA, when used alone or in combination with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), does not lower blood pressure. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in adults with dyslipidemia shows that supplemental EPA reduces systolic, but not diastolic, blood pressure when compared with control (102389). Other preliminary clinical research in adults with slightly elevated diastolic blood pressure (84-94 mmHg) also shows that taking a combination of EPA 0.48 grams plus gamma-linolenic acid 0.12 grams does not reduce diastolic blood pressure (13771). A large clinical study shows that taking omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, providing EPA 330 mg and DHA 660 mg, for 3 years does not reduce blood pressure levels in adults over 70 years of age when compared with placebo. These findings were consistent in adults taking omega-3 fatty acids alone or combined with vitamin D 2000 IU daily and/or strength training three times weekly. About 39% of the individuals included in this study were diagnosed with hypertension and about 50% were using antihypertensives (104619).
• IgA nephropathy. Although there has been interest in using oral EPA for IgA nephropathy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of EPA for this condition.
• Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). It is unclear if oral EPA during pregnancy reduces the risk of IUGR. Details: A small clinical study in patients with a history of IUGR during a previous pregnancy shows that taking EPA 3 grams daily, starting at 12-14 weeks gestation and continuing until delivery, does not seem to reduce the risk of IUGR when compared with placebo (1027).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for lung cancer treatment. Details: In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, taking an oral nutritional supplement containing EPA (ProSure, Abbott Nutrition) 2 grams daily while undergoing chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin/carboplatin does not improve tumor response rate, survival, or physical functioning over a 12 month period when compared with taking an isocaloric control nutritional supplement (91413).
• Menopausal symptoms. It is unclear if oral EPA reduces hot flashes after menopause. Details: In post-menopausal adults with mild hot flash symptoms, clinical research shows that taking ethyl-EPA (ethyl-EPA) 500 mg three times daily, provides modest reduction in the frequency of hot flashes when compared with placebo. After 8 weeks of treatment, the mean number of hot flashes decreased by 1.58 per day in those taking ethyl-EPA. However, taking ethyl-EPA did not significantly decrease the severity of hot flashes or improve overall quality of life (16901). Research in patients with more severe hot flash symptoms is needed to confirm these results.
• Metabolic syndrome. Although there has been interest in using oral EPA for metabolic syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of EPA for this condition.
• Migraine headache. Although there has been interest in using oral EPA for migraine headache, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of EPA for this condition.
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for increasing muscle strength. Details: A large clinical study shows that taking omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, providing EPA 330 mg and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 660 mg, for 3 years does not increase muscle strength in adults over 70 years of age when compared with placebo. These findings were consistent in adults taking omega-3 fatty acids alone or combined with vitamin D 2000 IU daily and/or strength training three times weekly (104619).
• Physical performance. Taking EPA does not seem to improve physical performance in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for increasing physical performance in older adults. Details: Clinical research in mechanically ventilated patients shows that taking EPA 2 grams daily for 10 days, alone or with beta-hydroxymethylbutyrate 3 grams daily, does not increase diaphragm or quadriceps strength or thickness when compared with placebo (109223). Also, a large clinical study shows that taking omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, providing EPA 330 mg and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 660 mg, for 3 years does not improve physical performance in adults over 70 years of age when compared with placebo. These findings were consistent in adults taking omega-3 fatty acids alone or combined with vitamin D 2000 IU daily and/or strength training three times weekly (104619).
• Postoperative infection. Oral EPA has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that enteral nutrition supplemented with EPA in combination with RNA and L-arginine, given during the postoperative period, reduces the percentage of patients experiencing postoperative infectious/wound complications and shortens the duration of hospitalization by about 4 days when compared to standard enteral nutrition (5531). It is not clear if this effect is due to EPA, RNA, L-arginine, or the combination.
• Postoperative recovery. It is unclear if oral EPA helps to maintain postoperative lean body mass. Details: Weight loss and malnutrition are common after esophageal cancer resection. Preliminary clinical research shows that administering EPA-enhanced enteral nutrition does not attenuate loss of body weight or lean body mass by one month post-esophagectomy when compared with standard enteral nutrition (96504).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral EPA during pregnancy reduces the risk of hypertension. Details: A small study in patients with a history of intrauterine growth restriction during a previous pregnancy shows that taking EPA 3 grams daily, starting at 12-14 weeks gestation and continuing until delivery, does not seem to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension when compared with placebo (1027).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for prostate cancer treatment or prevention. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking EPA 4.48 grams and docosahexaenoic acid 2.88 grams daily for 12 weeks reduces prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in men with normal PSA levels at baseline. However, it is unclear if this effect was due to EPA alone. Additionally, it is unclear if this leads to a reduced risk for prostate cancer (89423). Observational research regarding the association between EPA and prostate cancer risk is conflicting. Although some early research suggests a possible association, a meta-analysis including this and other prospective observational research shows that increased dietary intake or serum levels of EPA are not associated with overall prostate cancer risk (90677,102503). One observational study in men with existing low-risk prostate cancer shows that the highest tertile of prostate tissue levels of EPA, as well as the highest tertile of dietary intake, is associated with 71% to 75% reduced odds for progression to high-grade prostate cancer when compared with the lowest tertile (102502). However, other prospective observational research suggests that increased dietary intake of EPA may be associated with an increased risk for fatal prostate cancer (102503). High-quality prospective research is needed to clarify these findings.
• Psoriasis. It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial in psoriasis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking ethyl-EPA 1.8 grams daily in combination with low-dose (20 mg per day) etretinate (Tegison, no longer available in the US) for 12 weeks is more effective than etretinate alone for plaque psoriasis (66478).
• Quality of life. It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for improving quality of life in patients with cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of eight clinical trials in cancer patients shows that taking EPA, usually alone in doses of 2-2.2 grams daily for 6-12 weeks, does not seem to improve quality of life when compared with placebo (106070). This analysis included two studies in which EPA was combined with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in fish oil.
• Schizophrenia. Evidence for the use of oral EPA in schizophrenia is conflicting. Details: Some clinical research shows that EPA improves mental state and reduces dyskinesia when taken along with antipsychotic medications (8720). However, other clinical research shows that EPA does not improve mental state, cognitive function, or mood in patients with schizophrenia who are taking antipsychotics (10347). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that EPA modestly improves the mental state of patients with schizophrenia who are not taking antipsychotic medications prior to treatment, but not those already being treating with antipsychotics at baseline. Some evidence suggests that ethyl-EPA might be more effective than EPA. Taking EPA does not appear to significantly decrease the need for conventional antipsychotics (15039). EPA or ethyl-EPA 1-3 grams daily in divided doses for 12-16 weeks has been used in these studies (8720,15039).
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although there has been interest in using oral EPA for SLE, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of EPA for this condition.
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) nephritis. Although there has been interest in using oral EPA for SLE nephritis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of EPA for this condition.
• Ulcerative colitis. It is unclear if oral EPA is beneficial for ulcerative colitis prevention and treatment. Details: Population research derived from the Nurses' Health Study shows that a higher dietary intake of omega-3 fatty acids is associated with a reduced incidence of ulcerative colitis. One study shows that taking EPA 1 gram twice daily for 6 months reduces fecal calprotectin levels, a marker of intestinal mucosal inflammation, by 40% when compared with placebo. Additionally, a 27% reduction in disease relapse was seen in the EPA group (96503).
• Wound healing. Although there has been interest in using oral EPA for wound healing, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of EPA for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate eicosapentaenoic acid for these uses.

(Read more about EICOSAPENTAENOIC ACID (EPA))

EFFECTIVE

• Folate deficiency. Oral or intravenous folic acid is effective for the prevention or treatment of folate deficiency. Details: Administering folic acid orally or parenterally improves and prevents folate deficiency (505,8739). Clinical research shows that supplementation with folic acid 100 mcg to 5 mg daily during pregnancy decreases the risk of developing megaloblastic anemia by up to 79% (91307).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Kidney failure. Taking folic acid orally reduces homocysteine levels in people with kidney failure who are on hemodialysis. Details: Over 85% of people with kidney failure have hyperhomocysteinemia. Treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia in kidney failure is often more difficult than with normal kidney function (1489,3324,7289,9413,9414,9416). The reasons for this are not fully understood; renal uptake and metabolism of homocysteine may be reduced in severe kidney failure, and hemodialysis may contribute to vitamin deficiencies (6884,9414,9417). Folic acid 0.8-15 mg daily or 3 times weekly is generally used, but the degree of homocysteine reduction varies between 12% to 50%, and normal homocysteine levels (less than 12 µmol/L) cannot always be achieved. Adding vitamin B12 400-1000 mcg daily and vitamin B6 20-50 mg daily produces an additional reduction in homocysteine (1489,6884,7289,7881,9322,9413,9414,9415,9416,9417). Folic acid doses greater than 15 mg daily do not seem to provide additional benefit. Also, doses of 30-60 mg might cause a rebound in homocysteine levels when treatment is stopped (9219). Despite the homocysteine-lowering effect of folic acid in kidney failure, the most robust meta-analysis of 11 clinical trials suggests that folic acid supplementation does not seem to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events (50527). A smaller meta-analysis of 7 clinical trials that used a different primary composite outcome suggests that folic acid might reduce the risk of cardiovascular events by 15% when compared with control (91311). There has also been interest in using a reduced form of folic acid, L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (L-5-MTHF). One study in patients on hemodialysis suggests that taking L-5-MTHF 17 mg daily for 12 weeks might lower homocysteine levels to a greater extent than an equimolar 15 mg of folic acid (104908). Another clinical trial in patients on hemodialysis suggests that giving intravenous L-5-MTHF 50 mg three times weekly is associated with an increased survival of about 36 months, compared with about 26 months with folic acid 5 mg daily. There was no difference in homocysteine reduction between groups (104909). These results should be interpreted with caution because they have not been replicated, and there was no placebo control. Furthermore, survival may have been affected by the availability of kidney transplants.
• Hyperhomocysteinemia. Oral folic acid, taken alone or in combination with other B vitamins, lowers homocysteine levels in most patients. However, it is unclear if this has cardiovascular benefits. Details: Taking folic acid orally 0.4-5 mg daily lowers fasting homocysteine levels by 20% to 30% in people with normal to moderately elevated homocysteine levels at baseline. Folic acid 0.8-1 mg daily seems to provide maximal reduction (9307,9400,9401,9405,9408,11337,11338,50145). Doses above 1 mg daily do not seem to add benefit (9307), except in some people with certain gene mutations that cause homocysteine levels of 20 µmol/L or higher (9408). The higher the initial homocysteine levels, the lower the folic acid dose needed to attain maximum homocysteine reduction (9307). The effects of folic acid supplementation on homocysteine concentrations appear to be greater in females than males (50145). Adding vitamin B6 25-250 mg or vitamin B12 500 mcg seems to further reduce homocysteine levels (1489,9400,9405,9406,9408,107136). Some experts recommend routine use of vitamin B12 in homocysteine-lowering regimens to avoid the risk of neuropathy in people with undetected vitamin B12 deficiency (9405). Increasing folic acid intake with supplements or folate-fortified cereal products is more effective for reducing homocysteine levels than increasing intake of folate-rich foods (6367). Fortification of cereals and flour with 140 mcg folic acid per 100 grams reduces the mean homocysteine level in the general population by about 7% (7881,9404,9407). Elevated homocysteine levels are considered by some to be an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis progression, recurrent thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and other vascular complications (3886,3887,6236,7725,9314,9318,50509). However, elevated homocysteine levels may be a marker, as opposed to a cause, of vascular disease (11387,11388). Although folic acid lowers homocysteine levels, it is not yet known whether this reduces the risk of vascular disease. One meta-analysis shows that taking folic acid can reduce the risk of stroke by about 10% in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD); the reduction is greatest in patients for whom homocysteine levels are lowered by at least 25% (96157). A meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials, including over 44,000 patients at risk for or with a history of CVD, shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo (97619). Also, a meta-analysis in patients with a history of stroke shows that B vitamin supplementation, including folic acid, reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% and the risk of vascular death by 11% when compared with placebo (107136). However other research does not agree. Meta-analyses of clinical research show that folic acid does not prevent CVD or coronary heart disease, in spite of lowering homocysteine by up to 55%, when individuals with normal or high levels of homocysteine are considered (50539,96147,97619). Furthermore, most research shows that folic acid supplementation, alone or in combination with vitamin B6 and vitamin B12, does not improve endothelial function or improve secondary prevention of cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction in people with existing CVD despite a homocysteine-lowering effect (9313,11337,11387,13482,50437,97619). Some research even suggests an increase in CVD risk concurrent with homocysteine lowering (13482). Large randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm or refute these findings. Some researchers hypothesize that different genetic profiles might explain some of these conflicting results. For instance, individuals with a homozygous 677TT MTHFR genotype typically have increased homocysteine levels. However, a meta-analysis suggests that treatment with folic acid does not reduce the risk of ischemic heart disease despite reducing homocysteine levels in individuals with 677TT MTHFR (50456). It has also been theorized that a reduced form of folic acid, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) might work better in these individuals. Although [6RS]-5-MTHF has been shown to lower homocysteine levels (104915), studies assessing its cardiovascular benefits are lacking.
• Methotrexate toxicity. Oral folic acid reduces the severity of methotrexate toxicity. Details: Oral folic acid reduces methotrexate toxicity symptoms, such as nausea and vomiting, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriasis (768,2162,2163,2164,4492,4493,4494,9369,9419). Folic acid also seems to reduce methotrexate-induced hepatic side effects by approximately 36% (50320). Some research shows that a low, 0.8 mg weekly dose of folic acid is equally effective to a higher dose of 5 mg weekly for the prevention of methotrexate toxicity (102388).
• Neural tube birth defects. Oral folic acid helps to prevent neural tube birth defects in newborns. Details: Clinical practice guidelines recommend that anyone capable of becoming pregnant take folic acid 400 mcg daily from fortified foods or supplements to prevent neural tube birth defects in infants. Folic acid 600 mcg daily is advised during pregnancy (94811,96146). This recommendation is based on research showing that a higher intake of folic acid from food and supplements during pregnancy reduces the primary incidence of neural tube birth defects by 41% to 69% (3325,9309,50344,50403,50468,95156). Individuals with a history of children with neural tube birth defects usually take a higher dose of folic acid 4000 mcg daily starting one month before and continuing for up to 3 months after conception (96146). Evidence shows that, when used for secondary prevention, folic acid supplementation reduces the incidence of neural tube defects by 66% to 87% (21235,50263,50344,50403,95156). In the US, foods containing at least 60 mcg of folic acid can be labeled with a health claim stating that healthful diets with adequate folic acid intake may reduce the risk of having a child with a brain or spinal cord defect (102369).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cognitive impairment. Taking folic acid alone, with other B vitamins or with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), might improve thinking and memory skills in older patients with cognitive impairment. Details: One clinical trial in patients aged 65 years and older with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) shows that taking folic acid 400 mcg daily for 2 years increases IQ scores when compared with placebo (100952). Two small, low-quality clinical studies in patients aged 70-90 years with cognitive impairment and low folate levels or folate deficiency shows that taking folic acid 5 or 15 mg daily for up to 63 days improves cognitive function, including measures such as memory and attention, when compared with placebo or baseline (50301,104911). Folic acid also appears to be beneficial when used in combination with other B vitamins or with DHA. A clinical trial in patients aged 70 years and older with MCI shows that taking folic acid 800 mcg, vitamin B6 20 mg, and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily for 2 years mitigates decline in executive function and, in patients with high baseline homocysteine levels, improves cognition and memory when compared with placebo (50480). Taking folic acid 800 mcg with or without DHA 800 mg daily for 6 months modestly improves cognition, as measured on the full-scale intelligence quotient, when compared with placebo (103978,109196). However, this benefit is no longer present at 6 months after treatment discontinuation (109196).
• Depression. Oral folic acid seems to modestly reduce depression severity when added to conventional antidepressant therapy. It is unclear if folic acid can reduce the prevalence of depression or the risk for suicide. Details: Observational studies suggest that depression is correlated with low folate status, particularly in females (50105,50127,50243). Taking folic acid 0.2-15 mg daily for up to 6 months with conventional antidepressants seems to improve treatment response in patients with major depressive disorder (3657,10884,10887,50566,109190). One meta-analysis shows that taking L-methylfolate or folic acid as an adjunct to treatment with conventional antidepressants modestly reduces depression severity when compared with placebo and conventional antidepressants. The response and remission rates were improved by 36% and 39%, respectively (109190). However, limited clinical research suggests that folic acid is not effective as a replacement for conventional antidepressant therapy (10886). Also, a small clinical study in adolescents at high familial risk for mood disorders suggests that taking folic acid 2.5 mg daily for up to 36 months does not prevent mood disorders when compared with placebo. However, in the patients that were eventually diagnosed with depression, the time of onset was delayed from 5 months to 15.5 months in the group using folic acid when compared with placebo (91313). Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that folic acid is not currently recommended as monotherapy treatment for unipolar depression (110318). Observational research has also evaluated the association between folic acid supplementation and suicidal events in patients with or without depression. One within-person cohort study, in which only 12% of patients were diagnosed with depression, has found that filling a folic acid prescription of 0.4-5 mg daily, either alone or as part of a multivitamin, is associated with a reduced risk for suicidal events during the following months when compared with months without a prescription (109201). It is unclear what percentage of these patients, if any, had folate deficiency at baseline.
• Hypertension. Oral folic acid seems to modestly reduce hypertension. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking folic acid 5-10 mg daily for at least 6 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure by 2mmHg and improves flow-mediated dilation by 1.6% in hypertensive individuals (50364). Some research has evaluated folic acid in hypertensive patients when used with antihypertensive drugs. Results show that taking folic acid 400-800 mcg in combination with enalapril 10 mg daily for about 4.5 years does not improve blood pressure when compared with enalapril alone (50302,96158). However, in hypertensive patients with heavy proteinuria, this combination seems to reduce the risk of all-cause mortality by about 41% when compared with enalapril alone (96158).
• Phenytoin-induced gingival hyperplasia. Topical folic acid seems to reduce gingival hyperplasia due to phenytoin. The effect of oral folic acid is unclear. Details: Applying folic acid topically seems to inhibit gingival hyperplasia secondary to phenytoin therapy (2151). However, taking folic acid orally does not seem to improve gingival hyperplasia secondary to phenytoin therapy in adults (2150,2151,2152), although some evidence suggests that taking folic acid 500 mcg daily reduces the risk of phenytoin-induced gingival hyperplasia by 33% in children when compared with placebo (50463).
• Stroke. Although some clinical research has shown that oral folate reduces stroke risk by a small amount, more research is needed to determine who is most likely to benefit. Most individual clinical trials show that folic acid seems to reduce stroke risk only in regions without food-fortification policies. Details: Multiple clinical studies have shown that folic acid supplementation reduces the risk of stroke by 10% to 25% in regions WITHOUT established policies mandating folic acid fortification of grain products (50240,50485,50525,50539,91325,96154,96157,96159,97308). The effect appears to be greatest when folic acid is taken in low doses (usually 0.8 mg daily or lower) (50525,96157,96159), in regions with a low prevalence of statin use (50525,96159), in patients with high cholesterol levels at baseline (96152), in patients who achieve homocysteine reduction of at least 20% (50407,96157), and in patients with the lowest folate levels at baseline (96154,96157). There is also some evidence that the effect of folic acid on stroke risk is greatest in patients with low baseline levels of vitamin B12 (96159). In 2001, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368). Most research shows that folic acid supplementation does not reduce the risk of stroke in regions WITH established policies mandating folic acid fortification (50240,50485,50525,50539,96157,96159,97308). However, there is some evidence that folic acid may reduce the risk of stroke in patients from regions with folic acid fortification who have recently had a stroke or transient ischemic attack and are not using antiplatelet drugs (90379). Meta-analyses of clinical research have been conducted. However, possible confounding due to the presence or absence of folic acid fortification is unclear. A meta-analysis of the available research in adults with existing CVD shows that folic acid supplementation at a daily dose of less than 2 mg reduces the risk for stroke by about 10% (102386). Also, a meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials, including over 44,000 patients at risk for or with a history of CVD, shows that B vitamin supplementation, including folic acid, reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo (97619). In patients with a history of stroke, a meta-analysis shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% and the risk of vascular death by 11% when compared with placebo (107136). It is unclear if folic acid reduces the stroke risk in patients with impaired kidney function. Some research shows that taking folic acid in combination with high doses of vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) does not reduce the risk of stroke in these patients (11387,96150). However, there is concern that the lack of benefit may have been due to the decline in kidney function from high doses of cyanocobalamin (96150). Additional research is needed to determine if folic acid supplementation is beneficial in patients with impaired kidney function when used with other forms of vitamin B12 such as methylcobalamin or hydroxycobalamin.
• Vitiligo. Oral folic acid seems to improve vitiligo symptoms. Details: Taking folic acid orally seems to improve symptoms of vitiligo (2153,2154). This finding is supported by a meta-analysis of observational research which shows that patients with vitiligo have higher serum homocysteine levels when compared with patients without vitiligo (100951).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Anemia. Adding oral folic acid to oral iron therapy does not seem to improve hematologic parameters in patients with anemia. Details: In postpartum patients with anemia, clinical research shows that taking iron as ferrous fumarate 600 mg and folic acid 1 mg daily is no more effective than iron alone for improving hemoglobin status (91319). Also, clinical research in non-pregnant menstruating females shows that taking folic acid 0.4 mg daily or 2.8 mg once weekly for 16 weeks with iron 60 mg daily does not reduce anemia or improve iron status when compared with iron alone (109193). During pregnancy, clinical research shows that folic acid supplementation does not decrease the risk of pre-delivery anemia or low hemoglobin levels (91307).
• Age-related cognitive decline. Oral folic acid does not seem to prevent cognitive decline in healthy elderly adults. Details: Most clinical research shows that taking folic acid, alone or in combination with other B vitamins, does not improve cognitive function, including memory, language, or executive function, in elderly adults with age-related cognitive decline (50318,50412,50510). In fact, a large-scale observational study in the US has found that people over 65 years of age who consume large amounts of folic acid (median of 742 mcg daily) have cognitive decline at a rate twice as fast as those consuming smaller amounts (median of 186 mcg daily) (13068). While most research on folic acid for age-related cognitive decline lacks positive findings, many of the studies are small, short-term (<1 year), underpowered to detect significant differences, and not specific to patients with high homocysteine levels. Population research has found that high homocysteine levels are associated with decreased cognition in older adults, suggesting that using folic acid to lower homocysteine levels might mitigate cognitive decline in these patients (50094). Two long-term clinical trials examining the effects of folic acid in elderly adults with high homocysteine levels show mixed results. A large-scale clinical trial of patients aged 50-70 years from the Netherlands who have high homocysteine levels shows that taking folic acid 800 mcg daily for 3 years increases memory, information processing, and other measures of cognitive function when compared with placebo (15271). However, another large-scale clinical trial of patients aged 65 years and older from the Netherlands who have high homocysteine levels shows that taking folic acid 400 mcg and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily for 2 years lowers homocysteine levels, but does not appear to improve overall measures of cognitive function, when compared with placebo (90392). The reasons for the discrepant findings in these two studies are not clear but might relate to differences in the dose of folic acid, duration of treatment, and age of patients included.
• Cataracts. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce cataract development. Details: Clinical research in females with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or with risk factors for CVD shows that taking folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for an average of 7.3 years does not reduce the risk of developing cataracts. Furthermore, the risk of cataract extraction was increased by 28% in these patients (96149).
• Diarrhea. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of diarrhea, and might even increase the incidence of diarrhea in children. Details: In children aged 6-30 months at risk of malnourishment, clinical research shows that taking a nutritional supplement (Nutriset Ltd) enriched in folic acid 75-150 mcg, with or without vitamin B12 0.9-1.8 mcg, daily for 6 months does not reduce the incidence of diarrhea when compared with placebo. Enrichment with folic acid, with or without vitamin B12, actually seems to increase the likelihood of having more episodes of both persistent diarrhea and diarrhea lasting over 3 days (90391).
• Fall prevention. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of falls. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 400 mcg and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily, for 2 years, does not prevent falls when compared with placebo in elderly individuals also taking vitamin D (96148).
• Fetal and premature infant mortality. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem prevent mortality in premature infants. Details: Clinical research shows that supplementation with folic acid during pregnancy does not decrease the risk of miscarriage, stillbirth, or neonatal death (91307,96156).
• Leukemia. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to reduce the risk for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Details: A meta-analysis of results from two case-control studies has found that increased folate intake during pregnancy is not associated with a reduced risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (50247).
• Male infertility. Oral folic acid does not seem to improve sperm parameters or pregnancy rates in males with infertility. Details: Some small clinical studies show that taking folic acid, alone or with zinc, increases sperm count in males with idiopathic infertility or in males with a grade III varicocele (9334,90194). However, another small study in males with asthenozoospermia shows that taking folic acid 5 mg, selenium 200 mcg, and vitamin E 400 IU daily for 3 months does not improve sperm parameters when compared with placebo (104907). Furthermore, there seems to be no improvement in clinical outcomes. One large, high-quality clinical study in males with idiopathic infertility shows that taking folic acid 5 mg with zinc 30 mg daily for 6 months does not improve sperm morphology, pregnancy rate, or live birth rate when compared with placebo (102085). Folic acid has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A retrospective study in males with or without varicocele-related infertility suggests that taking a specific combination product containing folic acid 0.2 mg, vitamin C, zinc, L-carnitine fumarate, acetyl-L-carnitine, coenzyme Q10, selenium, and vitamin B12 (Proxeed Plus, Sigma-Tau) twice daily for 6 months is associated with improvements in sperm count, sperm concentration, and sperm motility when compared to baseline. Improvement in semen parameters were greatest in subjects with more severe varicoceles (111296). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Osteoporosis. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Details: Clinical research in elderly adults or adults with a history of cerebrovascular disease shows that taking vitamin B12 500 mcg and folic acid 0.4-2 mg, with or without vitamin B6 25 mg, daily for 2-3 years does not seem to reduce the risk for osteoporotic fractures when compared with placebo (90377,90393). A 5-7 year follow-up of this research has also found no benefit (103981).
• Physical performance. Oral folic acid does not seem to improve physical performance in older adults. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 400 mcg and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily for 2 years, does not improve hand strength or improve performance such as walking when compared with placebo in elderly individuals also taking vitamin D (96148).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral folic acid does not seem to prevent pre-eclampsia in pregnant patients. Details: While the effect of low-dose prenatal folic acid is unclear, high-dose folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia. Some population research has found that low-dose folic acid is associated with a 22% reduced odds of pre-eclampsia, while other research has found no association (91308,99370,99372,110447). A large clinical trial evaluating high-dose folic acid in pregnancies at risk for pre-eclampsia shows that taking 4 mg daily, starting at 8-16 weeks of gestation and continuing until delivery, does not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia when compared with placebo (103929). A secondary analysis of this study in twin pregnancies has also found no benefit with high-dose folic acid supplementation (103977).
• Respiratory tract infections. Oral folic acid does not seem to prevent respiratory tract infections. Details: Clinical research in children aged 6-30 months at risk of malnourishment shows that taking a nutritional supplement (Nutriset Ltd) enriched in folic acid 75-150 mcg, with or without vitamin B12 0.9-1.8 mcg, daily for 6 months does not reduce the incidence of lower respiratory infections when compared with a supplement not enriched with folic acid and vitamin B12 (90391).

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Colorectal adenoma. Oral folic acid does not prevent colorectal adenomas. Details: Although some population research and one clinical study has found that high folate intake is associated with reduced colorectal adenoma risk (2142,2143,91303), most clinical research does not support this finding. Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for up to 9.2 years, does not reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma in females at high risk of cardiovascular disease when compared with placebo (90389). Other clinical research suggests that taking folic acid does not reduce the occurrence or recurrence of adenomas or incidence of advanced adenomas (34596,50241,50265,50369,50394,50449,50522). Furthermore, treatment with folic acid for more than 3 years seems to be associated with an increased risk of advanced adenomatous lesions (50378).
• Fragile X syndrome. Oral folic acid does not improve symptoms in children with fragile X syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking folic acid orally does not improve symptoms of fragile X syndrome (2155,2156,2157,2158,2159,2160,50575).
• Preterm labor. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of preterm birth. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that supplementation with folic acid 200 mcg to 5 mg during pregnancy does not decrease the risk of preterm birth (91307,96155). An observational study in patients with and without epilepsy found that folic acid supplementation during pregnancy was associated with a lower odds of preterm birth in patients receiving antiseizure medications; however, no link between folic acid and preterm labor was reported in patients without epilepsy or in those with epilepsy not receiving antiseizure medications (110447).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Abdominal wall defects. It is unclear if oral folic acid helps to prevent abdominal wall defects in newborns. Details: Observational research in a population in northern China has found that taking folic acid supplements until the end of the first trimester modestly reduces the risk of abdominal wall defects and the risk of omphalocele, specifically, in the newborn when compared with not taking folic acid. However, this association was not found in a population in southern China (109191). These differing outcomes may be related to the lower dietary folate intakes in northern China.
• Acne. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults and children with inflammatory acne shows that taking 1-4 tablets of a specific product (NicAzel, Elorac Inc.) containing folic acid, vitamin B6, nicotinamide, azelaic acid, zinc, and copper for 8 weeks reduces inflammatory lesions and improves appearance in 88% and 81% of patients, respectively, when compared with baseline (90800).
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large-scale clinical study shows that taking folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily reduces the risk of developing AMD in females over 40 years of age with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or with risk factors for CVD. Those who took this combination for an average of 7.3 years had a 34% reduced risk of developing AMD and a 41% reduced risk of visually significant AMD when compared with placebo (14620). It is unclear if this effect is due to folic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Age-related testosterone deficiency. Folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in males with overweight or obesity, mild erectile dysfunction, and normal to low androgen levels shows that taking a combination product containing folic acid 400 mcg, alpha-lipoic acid, myo-inositol, and apple (Sinopol Forte) increases testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and measures of erectile dysfunction but not follicle-stimulating hormone or sperm parameters when compared to baseline (111674). The validity of these effects is limited by the small sample size and the lack of a comparator group, and it is unclear if these effects are due to folic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of developing this condition. Details: Low levels of folate and high levels of homocysteine have been linked to a greater risk of Alzheimer disease (50094). Also, some observational studies have found that higher intake of folate from the diet and supplements in elderly adults is associated with a reduced risk of developing Alzheimer disease when compared with lower intake (13165,15270). One small clinical trial in patients with Alzheimer disease who are taking cholinesterase inhibitors shows that taking folic acid 1 mg daily for 6 months increases the likelihood of treatment response, classified as global improvement in behavioral and/or functional status with no decline in mental status scores, by 78% to 87% when compared with placebo (50246). Also, preliminary clinical research in patients with probable Alzheimer disease who are not consuming a folate-fortified diet shows that taking vitamin B12 50 mcg daily plus folic acid 1.2 mg daily for 6 months modestly improves some measures of cognitive performance and decreases levels of homocysteine when compared with placebo (107150). However, not all research agrees. Clinical research in patients with probable Alzheimer disease using routine medications shows that taking folic acid 5 mg, vitamin B12 1 mg, and vitamin B6 25 mg daily for 18 months does not have a beneficial effect on cognitive function or the severity of disease when compared with placebo (50319). However, all patients in this study were also consuming a folate-fortified diet.
• Angioplasty. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Some evidence suggests that folic acid 1 mg, vitamin B12 400 mcg, and pyridoxine 10 mg daily can decrease the rate of restenosis in patients treated with balloon angioplasty (8009,9412). However, this combination does not seem to be as effective for reducing restenosis in patients after coronary stenting (8009). An intravenous loading dose of folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 followed by oral administration of folic acid 1.2 mg, vitamin B6 48 mg, and vitamin B12 60 mcg daily after bare metal coronary stenting also does not seem to reduce restenosis and might actually increase restenosis (12150,12151). Due to the lack of evidence of benefit and potential for harm, this combination of vitamins should not be recommended for patients receiving coronary stents (12151).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if oral folic acid during pregnancy reduces the risk of eczema in the child. Details: Observational research has found that consuming both iron and folic acid supplements during pregnancy is associated with a four-fold reduced risk for developing atopic dermatitis in the child. However, use of either iron or folic acid supplementation alone is not associated with an effect on the child's risk for atopic dermatitis (102387).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral folic acid intake during pregnancy reduces the risk of autism spectrum disorder in the child. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that consumption of folic acid of at least 400 mcg daily from both diet and supplements during pregnancy is associated with a 45% reduced risk of autism in the child at 2-15 years of age. Also, supplementation with folic acid during the prenatal to early period of pregnancy is associated with an approximate 43% reduced risk of autism in the child. This association did not differ between countries with or without a folate fortification program (109198). An individual population study has also found that prenatal folic acid supplementation initiated the first day of the last menstrual period before conception is associated with a 39% reduced odds of autism in the child at age 3.3-10.2 years when compared to pregnancies without folic acid supplementation (91324).
• Beta-thalassemia. There is limited evidence on the oral use of folic acid for beta-thalassemia minor. Details: Patients with beta-thalassemia minor may experience decreased muscle strength and increased bone or muscle pain. A small clinical study in children with this condition shows that taking folic acid 1 mg, with or without L-carnitine 50 mg/kg, daily for 3 months reduces bone pain by 64% to 84% and increases the number of stairs climbed by 2- to 5-fold when compared with baseline (90631). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if adding oral folic acid to conventional bipolar therapy further improves symptoms. Details: Some clinical evidence suggests that folic acid does not improve the antidepressant effects of lithium in patients with bipolar disorder (50566). However, other clinical evidence suggests that taking folic acid in combination with valproate during the acute phase of mania improves the effects of valproate (50357).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces breast cancer risk. Details: Some older population research suggests that increased intake or levels of folic acid alone does not affect the risk of breast cancer or breast cancer-related mortality (50218,50224). However, in a specific group of women who also consume high amounts of dietary methionine, cyanocobalamin (vitamin B12), or pyridoxine (vitamin B6), dietary intake of folate is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (9328,50224). Also, more recent population research has found that folic acid plus folate dietary intakes between 153-400 mcg are associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. This risk is further reduced in those who drink relatively large amounts of alcohol (90794). Folate intakes greater than 400 mcg daily do not appear to be protective against breast cancer (90794).
• Cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents cancer. Details: A large cohort study of children born to mothers with epilepsy on antiseizure medications suggests that prenatal folic acid exposure of 1 mg daily or more, at an average of 4.3 mg daily, is associated with a 2.7-fold greater risk of pediatric cancer when compared with children born to mothers with epilepsy but without prenatal exposure to high-dose folic acid. Additionally, this risk is not present in children of mothers without epilepsy taking high-dose folate (112103). It is unclear how maternal epilepsy, antiseizure medications, and folate interact to increase the risk of pediatric cancers. However, in the absence of clear guidelines, mothers with epilepsy should take no more than 4 mg of folic acid daily (112101,112102).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although oral folic acid does not seem to prevent most CVD events, some research suggests that increased dietary folic acid might lower the risk of stroke and CVD-related mortality in patients at high risk for CVD. Details: In 2001, prior to the publication of the highest quality research on this topic, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368). Meta-analyses of available research show that folic acid might lower the risk of stroke in patients with CVD (97619,102386,107136). Some clinical research shows that taking folic acid reduces the risk of CVD by 15% in patients with kidney failure or chronic kidney disease (50444,91311). However, most research shows that folic acid supplementation, alone or in combination with vitamin B6 and vitamin B12, does not improve endothelial function or reduce the risk of death or CVD events in patients with existing hyperhomocysteinemia, coronary heart disease, CVD, kidney disease, or prior stroke, despite having a homocysteine-lowering effect (9313,9322,11337,11387,13482,50437) (50512,50527,96154,96147,97619,102386). Some population research has evaluated adults at high risk for CVD. This research has found that dietary folate intake of at least 382 mcg daily is associated with a modest reduction in CVD-related mortality and possibly all-cause mortality. Consuming folic acid as a component of fortified food in doses of more than 251 mcg daily is associated with a modest reduction in CVD-related mortality. Conversely, folic acid supplementation is associated with a higher risk of CVD and overall mortality, and there is a J-shaped association between folate intake, serum folate levels, and red blood cell folate levels, with both CVD-related and all-cause mortality (109199).
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents cervical cancer. Details: Epidemiological evidence has found that increasing folate intake from dietary and supplement sources, along with thiamine, riboflavin, and vitamin B12, might decrease the risk of precancerous cervical lesions (11074).
• Child development. It is unclear if oral folic acid supplementation during pregnancy improves child development. Details: Clinical research in Northern Ireland shows that taking folic acid 400 mcg daily starting in the 14th week of gestation and continuing until the end of pregnancy improves word reasoning in the child at 7 years of age when compared with placebo. When compared with a historical cohort from Britain, folic acid supplementation was associated with an increase in full scale IQ, verbal IQ, performance IQ, and general language at 7 years of age (102385). At age 11, benefits in word reasoning were no longer significant. However, there were modest benefits in some measures of processing speed when compared with placebo. Verbal comprehension was modestly improved in females, but not males (109192). Observational research in pregnant individuals and their children in Spain has found that taking less than 400 mcg of folic acid daily during pregnancy is associated with lower mental alertness scores in children at ages 7-9 years when compared with folic acid 400-999 mcg daily, while taking folic acid 1000 mcg or more daily during pregnancy was associated with improvements in some measures of working memory in the children. However, no relationship between folic acid dosing and most other measures of cognitive function was identified (110449).
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there is interest in using oral or injectable folic acid for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of folic acid for this condition.
• Chronic kidney disease (CKD). While adding oral folic acid to enalapril might slow CKD progression, adding folic acid to high-dose vitamin B12 does not seem to be beneficial. Details: Clinical research in adults with hypertension and CKD shows that taking enalapril with folic acid 800 mcg for a median of 4.4 years reduces the risk of worsening kidney function by 21% and slows the rate of kidney function decline by 44% when compared with enalapril alone (96153). However, clinical research does not support the use of folic acid in patients with CKD when used in combination with high-dose vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin). Vitamin B12 might increase the risk of negative outcomes (50253,50409,96150). More research is needed to determine the benefits of folic acid when used alone.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents colorectal cancer. Details: Although the majority of population research suggests that taking folic acid orally from dietary and supplemental sources reduces the risk of colorectal cancer (505,2140,2144,2145,2250,6271,9325,9326,50109,50427,50450)(91306,91323,96160,109188,110450), clinical evidence in general is not supportive. Most clinical research and meta-analyses of clinical trials suggest that taking folic acid from dietary or supplemental sources does not reduce the risk of colorectal cancer (2141,34596,50394). The reason for this discrepancy is unclear. Some observational research suggests that an inverse association between folate intake and risk of colorectal cancer was not apparent until at least 12 years after baseline folate intake was determined (109188). A meta-analysis of observational studies suggests that the benefits of folic acid supplementation on colorectal cancer risk might be limited to patients with moderate to high alcohol consumption (110450). Other clinical evidence suggests that the beneficial effect of folic acid may be limited to colon, but not rectal, cancer (21501). Furthermore, the beneficial effect for colon cancer may be limited to only certain subtypes. For instance, females with folate intake of at least 400 mcg daily seem to have a 46% reduction in the risk of p53-overexpressing colon cancer, but not p53-negative tumors, when compared with those who consume less than 200 mcg daily (21300). Also, the source of folic acid may influence its effects. Some observational research suggests that dietary folate, but not folic acid supplementation, reduces the risk of colon cancer (21501).
• Congenital heart disease. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents congenital heart disease. Details: The exact cause of congenital heart disease is unknown but is thought to be a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Population research has found that supplementation with folic acid or folic acid-containing prenatal vitamins during pregnancy is associated with up to a 40% lower risk of congenital heart defects in newborns (99373).
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of dementia. Details: While some preliminary research shows that folic acid might aid in the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer disease (13165,15270,50246,90374), two small clinical trials show that taking folic acid 15-20 mg daily for 10-12 weeks does not seem to improve cognitive function or the severity of dementia in patients with various forms of dementia, including vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, probable Alzheimer disease, or dementia due to other causes (50062,50597).
• Diabetes. Small clinical studies suggest that oral folic acid does not improve glycemic control. Details: Meta-analyses of small clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes show that folic acid does not reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) when compared with placebo (50528,109197). Another small clinical study in patients with diabetes who are stabilized on metformin and/or a sulfonylurea shows that taking folic acid 5 mg daily for 8 weeks does not affect HbA1C when compared with placebo (104917). The validity of this study is limited by its small size and lack of blinding. Conversely, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking folate modestly reduces fasting blood glucose and insulin levels, as well as measures of insulin resistance, when compared with placebo or no intervention (109197). There was no clear relationship between these changes and the dose or duration of folate. However, the studies included in this analysis evaluated multiple patient populations; the effect of folate in patients with diabetes, specifically, is unclear. Beyond glycemic control, some research has assessed the impact of dietary folate intake on cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. An observational study in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes has found that dietary intake of folate in the highest quartile is associated with 68% lower odds of developing cardiovascular disease, defined as a non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina, when compared with folate intake in the lowest quartile (110452). Folic acid has also been evaluated in gestational diabetes. A meta-analysis of 20 studies shows that serum and red blood cell (RBC) folate levels are higher in patients with gestational diabetes than without gestational diabetes. Subgroup analysis suggests that patients with gestational diabetes have higher serum and RBC folate levels in the second trimester than in those without gestational diabetes, while RBC folate levels in patients with gestational diabetes were higher in the first trimester than those without gestational diabetes. Overall, higher serum folate levels are associated with a slight increase in the odds of gestational diabetes when compared with lower serum folate levels (112107).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with diabetic neuropathy shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid (L-methylfolate), vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin), and vitamin B6 (pyridoxal-5'-phosphate), for 24 weeks does not improve neural dysfunction based on vibration perception, but does seem to improve total neuropathy symptoms, when compared with placebo. These symptoms, which include both sensation and pain, decreased by 25% with the B vitamin combination, compared with only 15% in those taking placebo (90375).
• Epilepsy. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces seizure frequency. Details: A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research shows that taking folic acid does not reduce seizure frequency in patients with epilepsy (50124). However, there is some speculation that folate deficiency might be linked to increased seizure frequency. A preliminary clinical study in folate-deficient children with epilepsy shows that taking folic acid 5 mg daily for 3 months reduces seizure frequency when compared to baseline, but not when compared with a control group that is not deficient in folate (99371).
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in males with mild erectile dysfunction, overweight or obesity, and normal to low androgen levels shows that taking a combination product containing folic acid 400 mcg, alpha-lipoic acid, myo-inositol, and apple (Sinopol Forte, Laborest) improves measures of erectile dysfunction when compared to baseline (111674). The validity of these effects is limited by the small sample size and the lack of a comparator group, and it is unclear if these effects are due to folic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Esophageal cancer. Higher dietary folate intake is associated with a lower risk of esophageal cancer. Details: One meta-analysis of observational research has found that higher levels of dietary folate are associated with a 34% lower risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and a 50% lower risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma when compared with low levels of dietary folate (50208). Another meta-analysis of observational research has found that consuming high amounts of folate is associated with a 36% decrease in the odds of esophageal cancer when compared with lower dietary folate intake (100950).
• Fenofibrate (Tricor)-induced hyperhomocysteinemia. Folic acid seems to attenuate increases in homocysteine in people taking fenofibrate. Details: A small open-label clinical trial in patients taking fenofibrate shows that adding folic acid 10 mg every other day might reduce elevated plasma homocysteine levels by up to 59% when compared with taking fenofibrate alone (9321).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces gastric cancer risk. Details: Observational research has found that taking folic acid reduces the risk of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma by 17% and the risk of noncardia gastric cancer by 33%, but does not reduce the risk of gastric cancer overall (50208). Also, a meta-analysis of 13 small clinical studies in patients with gastric precancerous conditions shows that taking folic acid 20-30 mg daily for 3-6 months improves gastric mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia but does not seem to improve symptoms when compared with a control (110448). Whether these findings are associated with a lower risk of gastric cancer is unclear.
• Gout. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk for gout. Details: An observational study has found that increased dietary folate intake is associated with a lower incidence of gout (50454).
• Head and neck cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial for head and neck cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that the highest intake of dietary folate is associated with a 50% reduced risk of head and neck cancer when compared with the lowest intake of folate. Each 100 mcg increase per day seems to reduce the risk by about 4% (96151).
• Hearing loss. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents hearing loss. Details: Low levels of serum folate seem to be a risk factor for sudden sensorineural hearing loss in adults (21283). Observational research in females has found that serum folate levels in the lowest quintile are associated with a 19% increased risk for hearing loss when compared with levels in the second quintile. Also, folate levels in the highest quintile are associated with a 12% lower risk of hearing loss when compared with the second quintile (109807). A clinical study in older adults from the Netherlands shows that taking folic acid 800 mcg daily for 3 years slows the decline of age-related low-threshold hearing loss when compared with placebo (15163). However, at the time of this study, folate enrichment of foods was not allowed in the Netherlands. As a result, baseline folate levels in this study population were about 50% lower than in the US population. The effect of folic acid supplementation in people with higher baseline folate levels is unclear.
• Infertility. It is unclear if oral 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) in combination with vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 is more beneficial than folic acid alone for increasing pregnancy rate in females undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Details: Retrospective research from Italy suggests that taking 5-MTHF 400 mcg, vitamin B12 5 mcg, and vitamin B6 3 mg daily results in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates of approximately 60% and 49%, respectively, compared with 45% and 35% of those taking folic acid 400 mcg daily. A sub-analysis suggests that beneficial effects on pregnancy rates are limited to individuals aged less than 40 years (109189). The findings from this study are limited by its retrospective design. Also, it is unclear if these findings are generalizable to countries with folate fortification.
• Kidney failure. It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial in patients with kidney failure. Details: Because hemodialysis removes folate from the body, there is concern that folate deficiency may cause complications in patients with kidney failure receiving hemodialysis. Observational research in Taiwanese patients with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis has found that taking folic acid 5 mg daily for an average of 5.8 years is associated with a 31% lower risk of arteriovenous access thrombosis when compared with folic acid 5 mg weekly. However, daily folic acid supplementation was not linked to a lower risk of cardiovascular events, cancer, or mortality when compared with weekly folic acid (110120). Oral folic acid has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small, low-quality clinical study in adults with kidney failure undergoing regular hemodialysis shows that taking oral folic acid 30 mg daily with thiamine 90 mg daily for 96 weeks reduces overall mortality by 67% and improves cognitive scores by 31% when compared with no intervention (107724). It is unclear if these findings are due to folic acid, thiamine, or the combination.
• Lometrexol toxicity. While oral folic acid might reduce lometrexol toxicity, intravenous folic acid does not seem to help. Details: In a phase I trial, intravenous folic acid 5-25 mg administered 1 hour or 3 hours prior to lometrexol 15-30 mg/m2 every 3 weeks does not seem to reduce cumulative lometrexol toxicity (2161). However, in a phase II study, taking oral folic acid 3 mg/m2 daily in addition to lometrexol 10 mg/m2 weekly seems to attenuate cumulative toxicity and improve its tolerability in cancer patients (104948).
• Low birth weight. It is unclear if oral folic acid supplementation during pregnancy reduces the risk of a low birth weight. Details: Clinical research shows that supplementation with folic acid 200 mcg to 5 mg daily during pregnancy increases mean birth weight when compared with placebo (91307). Furthermore, some population research has found that pre- or peri-conception folic acid supplementation, usually 400 mcg daily, is associated with a reduced risk of a child born small-for-gestational age. However post-conception folic acid supplementation is not associated with reduced risk (91304,103983). An observational study in pregnant Chinese patients found that supplementation with folic acid is associated with a 20% lower odds of low birth weight when compared with no supplementation. This association was observed when folic acid was used both before conception and during pregnancy for at least 24 weeks or during pregnancy only for at least 12 weeks. Increased dietary folate intake was not linked to a lower risk of low-birth-weight infants (110446). However, other observational research has found no association between folic acid supplementation during pregnancy and the risk for small-for-gestational age births (110447).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces lung cancer risk. Details: There does not appear to be a relationship between deficiency of folate and lung cancer (9454). However, consuming at least 130.4 mcg of folate per 1000 kcal daily seems to reduce the risk of lung cancer by 40% in former smokers when compared to those with lower dietary folate intake (50065).
• Melanoma. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces melanoma risk. Details: Population research has found that folic acid supplementation of 2-2.5 mg daily in combination with vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 is linked with a 53% reduced risk of melanoma (91312).
• Metabolic syndrome. Although there is interest in using oral folic acid for metabolic syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of folic acid for this condition.
• Nitrate tolerance. It is unclear if oral folic acid helps to prevent the development of tolerance to treatment with nitroglycerin. Details: Some clinical evidence suggests that taking folic acid 1 mg daily for 1 week does not prevent the development of nitroglycerin-induced endothelial dysfunction or tolerance in healthy individuals (50442). However, other research suggests that taking folic acid 10 mg daily for 1 week prevents nitric oxide synthase dysfunction caused by continuous nitroglycerin (9316).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: A cross-sectional analysis suggests that adults with NAFLD have lower levels of serum folate and its major component 5-MTHF when compared with healthy controls. Additionally, adults with NAFLD seem to consume less supplementary and dietary folate when compared with healthy controls. Overall, serum folate levels are negatively associated with the risk of NAFLD, and inadequate folate intake is associated with an increased risk of NAFLD (112104).
• Oral clefts. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of oral clefts in infants. Details: Observational research has found that maternal folic acid supplementation is associated with an up to 49% reduced risk of cleft lip with or without cleft palate (50220,104921). Furthermore, a large clinical trial in pregnancies at-risk for oral cleft suggests that taking a higher dose of folic acid 4 mg from pre-conception until the end of the first trimester results in a similar oral cleft recurrence rate of 2.5%, compared with a 2.9% recurrence with a lower dose of folic acid (400 mcg). Both doses demonstrate a lower incidence of oral clefts when compared with historical rates of 6.3% (91322). Although there is speculation that genetic markers of folate status impact the effect of folic acid on orofacial cleft incidence, the current data do not show a relationship (104921).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of overall mortality. Details: Observational research in US adults has found that dietary intake of folic acid in the highest quintile is associated with a 14% to 23% lower risk of all-cause mortality and a 41% to 47% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality when compared with the lowest quintile of dietary folic acid intake (110451).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces pancreatic cancer risk. Details: Consuming greater than 280 mcg daily of dietary folate is associated with a decreased risk of exocrine pancreatic cancer (9327). A meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies suggests that consuming higher amounts of dietary folate reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer by 51% compared to low levels of dietary folate (50208). However, another meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies suggests that folate/folic acid intake does not significantly affect the overall risk of pancreatic cancer (50499). The contradictory results may be associated with the form of intake or may be related to the gender of the participants. A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that dietary folate, but not folic acid, significantly reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer (50387). Also, one meta-analysis of observational studies has found that high dietary folate decreases the risk of pancreatic cancer in females, but not males (50387).
• Peripheral neuropathy. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows taking a combination of folic acid 400 mcg, vitamin B12 3 mcg, and uridine monophosphate 50 mg daily (Keltican) for 60 days reduces pain associated with peripheral neuropathy. Use of this product reduces pain intensity by approximately 44%, with loss of burning pain in approximately 50% of patients, strong tingling or pricking in approximately 57% of patients, strong pain attacks in 92% of patients, and numbness in 90% of patients when compared with baseline. Radiating pain and the use of concomitant medications are also reduced (90384). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Furthermore, it is unclear if the benefits are due to folic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Pharyngeal cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces pharyngeal cancer risk. Details: Population research has found that intake of folic acid and folate from natural, fortified, and supplemented sources, may protect against oropharyngeal cancer. Intake of at least 258-816 mcg total folate/folic acid reduces the odds by 35% when compared with intakes of less than 344 mcg. Furthermore, folate/folic acid may be more beneficial for oral cancer versus pharyngeal cancer and in heavy alcohol users versus non users or light users (91302).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial for PCOS. Details: One clinical study in overweight or obese patients with PCOS shows that taking folate 1 mg or 5 mg daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces levels of homocysteine, as well as insulin resistance, when compared with placebo. However, only the 5 mg dose modestly reduces insulin, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. Neither dose appears to affect fasting plasma glucose, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglyceride levels when compared with placebo (109200). Other clinical research in patients with PCOS taking metformin shows that taking folate 400 mcg daily for 6 months does not affect glycemic parameters, plasma lipid levels, or hormone levels when compared with placebo (109194). The reasons for discrepancies between studies are unclear but may relate to patient characteristics. One study included only overweight or obese individuals with at least two of the three PCOS criteria, whereas the other study limited enrollment to patients in any weight category but with all three PCOS criteria (109194,109200).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of hypertension during pregnancy. Details: Population research has found that taking folic acid during pregnancy is not associated with a reduced risk of gestational hypertension (91308,99370,99372).
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). Although there is interest in using oral folic acid for RLS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of folic acid for this condition.
• Schizophrenia. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of folic acid 2 mg and vitamin B12 400 mcg daily for 16 weeks improves negative symptoms when compared with placebo in patients with schizophrenia who have persistent symptoms and a specific genetic variant of the folate transporter gene FOLHI. This variant normally results in reduced folate absorption. However, in patients without this genetic variant, folate is not beneficial with respect to negative symptom improvement (90387).
• Sickle cell disease. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other B vitamins; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with sickle cell disease shows that taking vitamin B12 4.2-6 mcg, folic acid 700 mcg, and vitamin B6 4.2-6 mg daily might lower homocysteine levels. However, it is unknown if this will reduce the risk of endothelial damage in these patients (9324).
• Suicidal ideation. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of suicidal ideation or suicide attempts. Details: One observational study has evaluated the association between folic acid supplementation and suicidal events in patients with various underlying conditions, including 12% with depression, 15% with anxiety, and 46% with pain. This within-person cohort study found that filling a prescription for folic acid 0.4-5 mg daily, either alone or as part of a multivitamin, is associated with a 44% reduced rate of suicidal events during the months after the prescription when compared with the months without the prescription. For the 48% of patients who received folic acid 1 mg daily, each additional month of taking the prescription was associated with a 5% decrease in suicidal events (109201). Prospective clinical research is needed to confirm any benefits of folic acid and to determine whether baseline folate deficiency plays a role in these outcomes. More evidence is needed to rate folic acid for these uses.

(Read more about FOLIC ACID)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). Oral grape leaf extract might improve CVI symptoms. It is unknown if other grape products are beneficial for CVI. Details: Some clinical trials in patients with CVI show that taking a specific grape leaf extract, known as red vine leaf extract (AS 195, Antistax, Boehringer Ingelheim), seems to improve leg edema after 6 weeks of treatment when compared with placebo. Doses of 360 mg and 720 mg daily were both effective, but the higher dose produced a slightly greater effect. Patients also reported decreases in subjective complaints such as tired or heavy legs, tension, and tingling and pain after 2-12 weeks of treatment (2538,52985,53005,53206).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Oral grape seed extract does not seem to improve hay fever symptoms. Details: A clinical study in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis shows that taking grape seed extract 100 mg twice daily for 8 weeks before ragweed pollen season does not seem to decrease seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms or antihistamine usage when compared with placebo (9182).
• Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Drinking grape juice does not seem to improve CINV. Details: Clinical research shows that taking 4 ounces of chilled Concord grape juice 30 minutes prior to meals for a week following each of four cycles of chemotherapy does not seem to reduce CINV when compared with placebo (53175).
• Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Drinking grape juice does not seem to improve LUTS. Details: Clinical research in middle-aged and older men with LUTS shows that drinking 100% Concord grade juice 240 mL daily for 3 months does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (96190).
• Mastalgia. Oral grape seed extract does not seem to improve mastalgia symptoms. Details: Clinical research in patients treated for early breast cancer using high-dose radiotherapy shows that taking the grape seed extract constituent proanthocyanidin 100 mg orally three times daily for 6 months does not reduce breast tissue hardness, pain, or tenderness when compared with placebo (53048).
• Obesity. Oral grape products do not seem to improve weight loss. Details: Clinical research in overweight or obese individuals shows that drinking Concord grape juice 480 mL daily for 12 weeks does not improve weight or body composition when compared to baseline (53181). Furthermore, taking grape pomace alone or in combination with schisandra fruit extract daily for 4-10 weeks does not improve body composition, abdominal fat, or body weight when compared with control (96200,99269,99270). Taking grape pomace 7-8 grams daily for 4-6 weeks seems to improve insulin resistance by about 33%, but does not affect blood lipids or blood pressure, when compared with placebo in overweight or obese adults with at least one metabolic syndrome factor (99269,99270).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Aging skin. Oral grape skin extract has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small study in adults with signs of aging skin shows that taking a specific combination product (Celergen, Laboratories-Dom) containing grape skin extract 10 mg, marine collagen peptides 570 mg, coenzyme Q10 10 mg, luteolin 10 mg, and selenium 0.05 mg, one capsule with breakfast and dinner for 2 months, might improve skin elasticity when compared with baseline. However, there was no effect on moisture or biological skin age (97930). It is not clear if these effects are due to grape skin extract, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Although there is interest in using oral grape seed for AMD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of grape for this condition.
• Atherosclerosis. Oral grape seed extract has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in postmenopausal adults shows that taking a specific combination product (Karinat, INAT-Farma) containing grape seed extract constituent proanthocyanidin 40 mg, garlic 100 mg, hops 160 mg, green tea 115 mg, vitamin C 30 mg, silicon 8 mg, vitamin E 6.6 mg, and beta-carotene 0.5 mg three capsules daily for 12 months might slow the progression of atherosclerosis as measured by mean carotid intima thickness when compared with placebo. However, the combination product does not seem to affect the growth of existing plaques, and it does not seem to improve lipid parameters (97929). It is not clear if these effects are due to grape seed extract, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral grape products are beneficial for athletic performance. Details: A small study in elite athletes shows that taking a specific grape extract (Powergrape, Naturex SA) 400 mg daily for one month can increase total power in a jumping task when compared with placebo, but has no effect on initial power and maintenance of power (53310). Another small study in recreationally active young adults shows that drinking juice prepared from 46 grams of a freeze-dried preparation of whole grapes daily for 6 weeks prior to a running exercise test does not improve maximal oxygen uptake or work capacity during exercise when compared with placebo (91540).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Topical grape products have only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with atopic dermatitis shows that twice daily application with a cream containing grape polyphenols, vitamin E, and epigallocatechin gallate for 28 days does not improve symptoms or reduce the affected area based on physician assessment when compared with placebo (96196).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although there is interest in using oral grape seed for ADHD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of grape for this condition.
• Canker sores. Although there is interest in using oral grape seed for canker sores, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of grape for this condition.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if oral grape products are beneficial for reducing CVD risk. Details: There is preliminary evidence that taking grape products, such as purple grape juice or red grape juice concentrate, might improve endothelium-dependent vasodilation, prevent low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation, reduce markers of inflammation, and suppress platelet-mediated thrombosis. Theoretically, chronic ingestion of these products might reduce the risk of CVD in various patient populations, including adults with type 2 diabetes or hypercholesterolemia, those undergoing hemodialysis, and children with metabolic syndrome (8745,8746,52954,53030,53062,53106,53155,53174). However, a large meta-analysis shows that although taking grape products, including grape extract, grape juice, raisins, and grape seed extract, reduces levels of blood fats by a small amount in a mixed population of adults, these effects were not present in a subgroup of patients with CVD when compared with placebo. There was a small benefit on total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (102610).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral grape products improve cognitive function. Details: Clinical research in healthy adults aged 55-75 years with no cognitive decline shows that taking a specific grape fruit extract (Cognigrape, Bionap srl) 250 mg daily for 12 weeks improves cognitive functioning by 4.5%, and overall neuropsychological status, including attention, language, and recall, by 6%, compared with no change in the placebo group (96198). Also, a preliminary clinical study in middle-aged women under moderate stress shows that drinking Concord grape juice 355 mL daily for 12 weeks improves immediate spacial memory and may improve executive function and verbal recall when compared with placebo (96195).
• Cognitive impairment. Small clinical studies suggest that oral grape products may not slow cognitive decline in older patients with cognitive impairment. Details: One very small study in in patients with mild cognitive decline shows that taking a freeze-dried grape powder 36 grams twice daily for 6 months does not improve most measures of cognitive function and memory, including immediate memory, delayed memory, speed of information processing, cognitive ability, or language, when compared with placebo (96199). Another very small study in older adults with signs of memory decline shows that drinking 100% Concord grape juice 6-9 mL/kg daily for 12 weeks does not improve delayed verbal recall or spatial memory when compared with placebo, although it does seem to moderately improve verbal learning (53166).
• Colorectal cancer. Oral grape seed extract is has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with colorectal cancer shows that taking a product containing grape seed extract, turmeric extract, fermented soybean extract, green tea extract, spirulina, and Taiwanofungus camphoratus, 1920 mg three times daily for 16 weeks during a chemotherapy regimen might modestly increase the effectiveness of treatment when compared with placebo. No patients in the treatment group experienced disease progression, compared with 15.8% (6 patients) of the placebo group. However, there was no significant effect on overall survival or the best response to treatment (96183).
• Constipation. Although there is interest in using oral grape products for constipation, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of grape for this condition.
• Dental caries. Although there is interest in using topical grape seed for dental caries, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of grape for this purpose.
• Diabetes. Oral grape extract has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study of males with type 2 diabetes mellitus and erectile dysfunction suggests that an oral combination product containing alpha lipoic acid, Gingko biloba, and grape extract (Blunorm Forte, Uriach S.p.A.) taken for 3 months may decrease fasting plasma glucose and Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) score both alone and when combined with avanafil when compared with baseline and placebo (110707).
• Diabetic retinopathy. It is unclear if oral grape seed extract is beneficial in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Details: A preliminary clinical study in patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy shows that taking a specific grape seed proanthocyanidin extract (Entelon, Hanlim Pharm) 50 mg three times daily for 12 months reduces the severity of hard exudates when compared with calcium dobesilate or placebo. Grape seed extract had a treatment success rate 3-fold and 5.5-fold higher than those of calcium dobesilate and placebo, respectively. Treatment success was defined as a 2-grade decrease in hard exudate severity. No significant improvements in retinopathy grade or visual acuity were reported (100954). However, the study may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference in these outcomes.
• Erectile Dysfunction (ED). Oral grape extract has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large study of males with type 2 diabetes mellitus and erectile dysfunction suggests that a specific combination product containing alpha lipoic acid, grape extract, and gingko biloba (Blunorm Forte, Uriach S.p.A.) administered orally for three months with avanafil prior to sexual acts improves International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores when compared with either product alone, placebo, and baseline, and may reduce markers of ED including high sensitivity-c-reactive protein, nitrates/nitrites, and metalloproteinases-2 and -9. These results suggest that an oral combination nutraceutical consisting of alpha lipoic acid, grape extract, and gingko biloba (Blunorm Forte, Uriach S.p.A.) may react synergistically with avanafil to enhance sexual performance in males with type 2 diabetes and erectile dysfunction. It is unclear if this effect is due to the alpha lipoic acid, grape extract, or gingko biloba, but researchers theorize that it may be due to the inhibition of phosphodiesterase-5 enzymes by grape extract (110707).
• Hemorrhoids. Although there is interest in using oral grape seed for hemorrhoids, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of grape for this purpose.
• Hypercholesterolemia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral grape products reduce cholesterol levels by a small amount. Details: A large meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials shows that taking grape products, including grape extract, grape juice, raisins, or grape seed extract, for 2-54 weeks reduces levels of total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, as well as triglycerides, by a small amount when compared with placebo in a mixed population of adults. In a sub-group of patients with any hyperlipidemia, the mean decreases in LDL cholesterol and triglycerides were 11 mg/dL and 14 mg/dL, respectively. There was no effect on levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in the mixed population or in adults with hyperlipidemia (102610). Although some individual studies disagree, the most evidence for benefit is related to use of whole grape extract or grape seed extract. It is not clear if benefit is dependent on dose or duration of use. These results suggest a benefit of grape products in patients with hypercholesterolemia, but any benefit is likely to be small (42585,96816,102610).
• Hypertension. Some research suggests that oral grape products may modestly lower blood pressure; however, results are inconsistent. Details: Some clinical trials have shown modest benefit in patients with prehypertension, mild hypertension, or metabolic syndrome (18228,53149,96197), but conflicting results exists (91541,90079). A 2016 meta-analysis including 16 trials of 810 patients shows that when compared with placebo, grape seed extract or polyphenols reduces systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by about 6 mmHg and 3 mmHg, respectively, with greatest improvements observed in those with obesity or metabolic syndrome. This meta-analysis suggests that a minimum treatment duration of 8 weeks may be necessary before benefit is seen (96194). However, other research in adults with hypertension shows that taking grape seed polyphenols 1000 mg daily for 6 weeks does not alter blood pressure. Also, when grape seed polyphenols were combined with vitamin C 500 mg daily, some patients experienced an increase in blood pressure and worsening of nighttime and daytime variation in blood pressure (13162,90079). The reason for these conflicting findings is unclear but may due to patient characteristics and comorbidities. A meta-analysis of clinical research in various patient populations shows that taking grape seed extract 150-2100 mg for 2-25 weeks improves DBP and heart rate when compared with control, but does not improve SBP or flow-mediated dilation, regardless of dose, duration, sex, BMI, or health status. Additionally, subgroup analyses suggest that blood pressure effects may be greater in patients who are otherwise healthy, female, overweight, and/or under 50 years of age. Also, the use of lower doses and longer treatment durations may be associated with greater benefit (108090). The validity of these findings is limited by the high heterogeneity of included studies. A clinical study in adults with mildly elevated blood pressure shows that a specific grape seed extract (Enovita; Indena SpA) standardized to provide at least 95% oligomeric proanthocyanins, taken as 150 mg twice daily for 16 weeks, does not reduce SBP or DBP when compared with placebo. However, a subgroup analysis suggests that taking grape seed extract improves blood pressure in males, but not in females, when compared with placebo (108091). Some research has also evaluated the effects of grape juice on blood pressure. Two clinical studies in patients with hypertension show that drinking grape juice can reduce blood pressure when compared to baseline; however, another study shows that drinking grape juice does not reduce blood pressure when compared with placebo in these patients (53018,53156,53199).
• Melasma. It is unclear if oral grape seed extract is beneficial in patients with melasma. Details: A very small clinical study in Japanese females with melasma shows that taking grape seed extract (Gravinol, Kikkoman Co) containing 54 mg of proanthocyanidins three times daily for 6-11 months reduces skin hyperpigmentation when compared to pretreatment (53016). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Menopausal symptoms. It is unclear if oral grape seed extract is beneficial in patients with menopausal symptoms. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with at least one menopausal symptom shows that taking grape seed extract (Gravinol, Kikkoman Biochemifa Co) containing proanthocyanidin 200 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces anxiety when compared with placebo. It also reduces hot flashes and other physical symptoms when compared to baseline, but not when compared with placebo. A lower dose of proanthocyanidin 100 mg daily does not appear to improve these outcomes. Neither doses improved insomnia or depression (91542).
• Metabolic syndrome. Small studies suggest that various oral grape products might improve lipid levels and blood pressure in patients with metabolic syndrome. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in adults with type 2 diabetes or metabolic syndrome shows that taking grape products, usually grape seed or grape extract, for 4-48 weeks reduces levels of total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, as well as triglycerides, by a small amount when compared with placebo. The mean decreases in LDL cholesterol and triglycerides were 2.6 mg/dL and 11 mg/dL, respectively (102610). These findings are limited by significant heterogeneity of the included research. Also, a small clinical study in overweight or obese adults, most with metabolic syndrome, shows that taking grape pomace 8 grams daily for 6 weeks improves insulin resistance by about 33%, but does not affect blood lipids, blood pressure, or fasting glucose, when compared with placebo (99270). Some grape products have also shown benefit for improving blood pressure in patients with metabolic syndrome. One small clinical crossover study in males with metabolic syndrome shows that taking 46 grams daily of a freeze-dried, dehydrated preparation of grape polyphenols (equivalent to about 250 grams of fresh grapes daily) for 30 days seems to modestly lower systolic, but not diastolic, blood pressure, and increase brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) when compared with placebo (18228). Also, a small clinical study in adolescents with metabolic syndrome suggests that drinking natural grape juice 18 mL/kg daily for one month improves FMD when compared with baseline (53174).The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group. A very small clinical study in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that taking a specific grape seed extract (Meganatural BP, Polyphenolics) 150-300 mg daily for 4 weeks modestly reduces blood pressure when compared with placebo (53149). The validity of this finding is limited due to small study size and because patients in the treatment groups had higher blood pressure at baseline.
• Minor bleeding. Topical grape vine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that topically applying 4 mL of a specific product (Ankaferd blood stopper) containing grape vine, alpinia, licorice, thyme, and stinging nettle reduces bleeding, but does not improve the surgical time for episiotomy repair, when compared with saline (31010). It is unclear if this effect is due to grape vine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral grape products improve muscle soreness. Details: One small study in active young adults shows that drinking juice, prepared from 46 grams of freeze-dried whole grapes, daily for 6 weeks prior to an eccentric arm exercise test does not reduce muscle inflammation or pain at 24 or 48 hours post-exercise when compared with placebo (91540).
• Night vision. Although there is interest in using oral grape seed extract for improving night vision, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of grape for purpose.
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral grape seed extract reverses fatty liver in patients with NAFLD. Details: One small clinical study in adults with NAFLD shows that taking grape seed extract 1000 mg twice daily for 3 months improves some, but not all, markers of liver damage and improves the grade of fatty liver change when compared with vitamin C supplementation (53190).
• Ocular stress. Although there is interest in using oral grape seed extract for ocular stress, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of grape for this purpose.
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Although there is interest in using oral grape seed extract for PMS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of grape for this condition.
• Wound healing. Limited research suggests that topical grape seed extract might improve wound healing. Details: A small clinical study in adults undergoing surgical removal of minor skin lesions shows that applying red grape seed extract 2% cream twice daily to the affected areas reduces the time to complete wound healing by about 6 days when compared with a placebo cream (91539). Also, preliminary clinical research in patients recovering from cesarean section shows that applying grape seed extract 5% ointment twice daily to cesarean section wounds for 14 days improves wound healing, as measured by a scoring system assessing redness, edema, ecchymosis, discharge, and wound closure, when compared with a placebo ointment. A 2.5% ointment did not improve wound healing measures when compared with placebo (100955). More evidence is needed to rate grape for these uses.

(Read more about GRAPE)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Human papillomavirus (HPV). A specific green tea extract ointment (Polyphenon E ointment 15%) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating external genital warts caused by HPV. Details: A specific green tea extract ointment (Veregen, Bradley Pharmaceuticals; Polyphenon E ointment 15%, MediGene AG) providing 150 mg of sinecatechins per gram of ointment, applied three times daily to external warts, completely clears external genital and perianal warts in 24% to 60% of patients after 10-16 weeks of treatment (15067,36438,36442,53777,53907,54018). This green tea extract is an FDA-approved prescription product (15067).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Drinking green tea seems to reduce the risk of CVD and CVD-related mortality. Details: Large-scale population research in Japan suggests that consuming at least 3-5 cups of green tea daily is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular mortality when compared with drinking less than 1 cup daily. This association appears to be primarily related to a decrease in risk for cerebral infarction and heart disease. This association appears to be stronger in females than in males (14498,53789,100202). Population research also suggests that drinking green tea is associated with a reduced risk of CVD. One meta-analysis suggests that drinking green tea is associated with a 28% reduced risk of CAD (54017). Another meta-analysis suggests that consuming small to moderate amounts of green tea, 1-5 cups or 300 to 1500 mL daily, is associated with an 8% to 16% reduced risk of coronary heart disease over 5 to 13 years when compared with consuming no green tea (111017). One meta-analysis suggests that a 1 cup increase in green tea consumption is associated with a 5% reduced risk of CVD mortality and a 3% reduced risk of CVD events (102728). When compared with drinking less than 1 cup of green tea daily, epidemiological research in a population at high risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) suggests that drinking more than 3 cups of green tea daily is associated with a 46% reduced odds of having CAD, especially severe CAD, as determined by a coronary angiography (104588). A sub-group analysis suggests that these odds only occurred in individuals consuming fruits more than 4 times weekly and not in individuals consuming fruits less often (104588). However, some population research suggests that any association seems to be greater for males than females (53691). Other population studies suggest that general tea consumption might protect against ischemic heart disease or death from CVD; however, many of the tea drinkers in some of these studies consumed black tea rather than green tea (8119,8120,8121,102728).
• Endometrial cancer. Drinking green tea seems to be beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: Meta-analyses of epidemiological research have found that people who drink green tea often, usually more than once daily, have a 21% to 23% reduced risk of developing endometrial cancer when compared with those who never or rarely drink green tea (53919,92409,102716). One of these meta-analyses also found that increasing green tea intake by one cup per day is associated with an 11% reduced risk of developing endometrial cancer (92409).
• Hyperlipidemia. Oral green tea seems to reduce levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by a small amount. Details: Clinical research and a meta-analysis of clinical research in people with or without hyperlipidemia shows that consuming green tea or green tea extract containing 150-2500 mg catechins daily for up to 24 weeks reduces total cholesterol by about 5-24 mg/dL and LDL cholesterol by about 2-25 mg/dL when compared with control (11308,54038,54048,90146,90161,97135,104605). There is also preliminary evidence that taking a green tea extract containing catechins 676 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces oxidation of LDL cholesterol when compared with placebo, which might lead to reduced damage to the vascular endothelium and reduced arteriosclerosis (98458). Epidemiological research has found that higher consumption of green tea, especially 10 cups daily or more, is associated with improved serum lipids in males, but not females (6403,97134).
• Ovarian cancer. Drinking green tea seems to be beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: Consuming tea, including green tea or black tea, appears to significantly lower the risk of developing ovarian cancer when compared with never or seldom consuming tea (9228,13208,90144,102716). One meta-analysis of population research suggests that the highest intake of green tea is associated with a 36% reduced risk of ovarian cancer when compared with the lowest intake (102716). Also, one prospective population study found that those who consume 2 or more cups of tea daily have a 46% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared with those who don't regularly consume tea (13208). There also appears to be a trend that suggests higher consumption of tea or longer duration of use further reduces the risk of ovarian cancer (9228,13208). However, green tea does not appear to prevent ovarian cancer recurrence. Preliminary clinical research shows that drinking 500 mL of double-brewed green tea (DBGT), prepared with 35 grams/L of tea leaves standardized to contain approximately 640 mg/L of EGCG, daily for up to 18 months does not prevent cancer recurrence in adults with a history of advanced stage serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer (90175).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Topical green tea might reduce acne lesions by a small amount. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for acne. Details: A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research shows that topical application of green tea extract reduces the number of inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions by a small amount (104609). In one small study, applying a solution containing the green tea constituent epigallocathechin-3-gallate (EGCG) 1% or 5% twice daily for 8 weeks was used (54074). However, oral green tea extract had limited or no effect in one study included in a meta-analysis (104609). Higher quality studies are needed to confirm this finding.
• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for cognitive decline associated with age. Details: In elderly individuals living in the community, clinical research shows that taking matcha green tea powder (Yabukita, Kyoeiseicha Co., Ltd.) 3 grams daily for 12 weeks does not improve overall measures of cognitive function when compared with placebo. However, a sub-group analysis in females found a small improvement in language, but not other measures, including memory, impulsivity, and attention (104602). Other clinical research in middle aged and older adults shows that taking green tea extract (Thea-Flan 90S, ITO EN Ltd.) providing catechins 336.4 mg daily for 12 weeks does not improve most measures of cognitive function, although there was a small effect on one measure of working memory. In addition, a single dose has a small effect on errors during an attention task (104603).
• Amyloidosis. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for amyloidosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis shows that drinking green tea (Green Darjeeling, FTGFOP1, Teekampagne Projektwerkstatt GmbH) 1.5-2 liters standardized to contain epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) 340 mg/L and/or taking specific capsules (Praevent-loges, Dr. Loges + Co. GmbH) containing 300 mg green tea extract standardized to contain EGCG 75 mg/capsule for 12 months protects against an increase in left ventricular wall thickness and left ventricular myocardial mass (54064).
• Anxiety. Although there has been interest in using oral green tea for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of green tea for this condition.
• Athletic performance. The evidence on the effects of green tea constituents for athletic performance is conflicting. Details: Some preliminary clinical research shows that taking green tea extract containing up to 572.8 mg of catechins as a beverage does not improve respiration efficiency, maximal oxygen uptake, or time trial performance in individuals undergoing endurance training when compared with beverages without catechins (53987,53991). However, other preliminary research shows that taking specific pills (Teavigo, Healthy Origins) containing epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) 135 mg/pill, taken three times daily with meals for a total dose of seven pills, improves maximal oxygen uptake but not maximum work rate or respiration efficiency, in healthy adults when compared with placebo (53944). Also, a small study in untrained adults shows that taking a single dose of green tea polyphenols 640 mg, 90 minutes before exercise, increases maximal oxygen uptake. However, the effect on athletic performance was not determined (104606).
• Beta-thalassemia. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for reducing iron accumulation in beta-thalassemia. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking green tea 3 cups daily after meals for 12 months, in addition to usual treatment with blood transfusions and deferasirox, an iron chelator, reduces levels of liver iron and serum ferritin by moderate amounts when compared with usual treatment alone. Hemoglobin values did not differ between groups. Each green tea bag contained 2 grams green tea (Lipton, Unilever Gulf) (104601).
• Bladder cancer. It is unclear if drinking green tea is beneficial for bladder cancer prevention. Details: Some epidemiological evidence suggests that drinking green tea is associated with a reduced risk of bladder cancer (1458,1459,90179). However, conflicting evidence exists. A meta-analysis of some epidemiological evidence suggests that drinking green tea is not associated with a reduced risk of bladder cancer (54077,90166,102716).
• Breast cancer. Evidence evaluating the association between green tea intake and breast cancer risk is inconsistent; any association may be dependent on genotype and menopausal status. Details: Meta-analyses of cohort and case-control studies have found that green tea intake is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (98460,102716). However, some individual population studies suggests that green tea intake is associated with a reduced odds of developing breast cancer in Asian-American (14427,53866), but not Asian (13189,14426,90181), populations. Any protective effect of green tea on breast cancer risk might depend on patient genotype or menopausal status. Green tea consumption does not seem to lower breast cancer risk in Asian females with low-activity angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) genotype, although it does seem to decrease breast cancer risk in Asian females with high-activity ACE genotype (14430). Similarly, Asian-American females who drink green tea seem to have a lower breast cancer risk if they have low-activity catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) genotype. However, they do not seem to benefit if they do not have the low-activity COMT genotype (14431). Additionally, some observational research suggests that there is a link between green tea and modestly reduced breast cancer risk in pre-menopausal, but not postmenopausal, females (99788). Some research has evaluated the effect of green tea on breast cancer recurrence. Population research suggests that Asian females who have had stage I or II breast cancer who drink at least 3 cups of green tea daily seem to have reduced risk of breast cancer recurrence (3926,13189,54112). However, drinking green tea does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of recurrence of later-stage breast cancer. In April 2012, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that it would allow a qualified health claim stating that consuming green tea may reduce the risk of breast cancer, although the FDA has concluded that there is very little scientific evidence to support this claim (102106).
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for cervical cancer. Details: Clinical research in adults with persistent high-risk HPV (HR HPV) infection and concomitant low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia shows that taking a specific green tea extract (Polyphenon E), four capsules standardized to contain epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) 200 mg/capsule, once daily for 4 months does not affect HR HPV-positive status or histological outcomes when compared with placebo (90145).
• Cervical dysplasia. It is unclear if topical green tea is beneficial for cervical dysplasia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a specific ointment (Polyphenon E ointment 15%, MediGene AG) containing epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) to human papilloma virus (HPV)-infected cervical lesions twice weekly and/or taking a specific green tea extract (Polyphenon E) 200 mg daily containing EGCG by mouth for 8-12 weeks can improve lesion appearance when compared with control (11310).
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there has been interest in using oral green tea for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of green tea for this condition.
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if drinking green tea reduces the risk of COPD. Details: One prospective, observational study in older adults has found that consumption of at least 3 cups daily of tea, including green tea, oolong tea, and black tea, is associated with a 23% reduction in COPD prevalence and a 65% reduced risk of developing COPD in models adjusted for potential confounders when compared with the lowest tea consumption (107201). However, green tea was only consumed by about 19% of the population included in this study and consumption of green tea itself was not associated with a reduced risk of COPD.
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral green tea improves cognitive function in healthy adults. Details: A small clinical study in adults ages 50-69 years shows that taking matcha powder (Hojin no shiro, Ito En, Ltd.) 9 capsules daily for 12 weeks, providing 170 mg total catechins daily, modestly improves some measures of attention and work performance when compared with taking placebo or caffeine. However, there was no effect on other measures of these outcomes, or on verbal memory tasks, visual information processing, working memory, motor function, or facial expression recognition (107168). Another small clinical study shows that taking a single dose of the green tea constituent, epigallocathechin-3-gallate (EGCG), 135 or 270 mg does not seem to improve mood or cognitive performance in healthy adults (54059).
• Cognitive impairment. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of mild cognitive impairment in elderly adults. Details: Some population research in elderly individuals has found that drinking green tea at least once per week is associated with a 53% reduced incidence of dementia or mild cognitive impairment when compared to not consuming green tea (104598). In addition, drinking at least two cups of green tea daily was associated with a 54% lower prevalence of cognitive impairment (104611). Some clinical research shows that taking two capsules of a specific combination product containing green tea extract 360 mg/capsule and L-theanine 60 mg/capsule (LGNC-07, LG Household & Health Care, Ltd) twice daily after meals for 16 weeks improves memory and attention in patients with mild cognitive impairment when compared with placebo (54019).
• Colorectal adenoma. It is unclear if oral green tea extract is beneficial for reducing colorectal adenoma recurrence. Details: A large clinical trial in patients with previously removed colorectal adenomas shows that taking green tea extract (Dr. Loges + Co. GmbH) standardized to epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) 150 mg twice daily for 3 years does not affect the risk of developing new metachronous adenomas when compared with taking placebo (111020). However, a sub-group analysis shows that taking green tea extract results in a 10% absolute reduction in risk of adenoma formation in males, but not females (111020). Also, preliminary clinical research in patients with previously removed colorectal adenomas shows that taking green tea extract 1.5 grams daily for 12 months reduces the incidence of metachronous adenomas when compared with placebo (53816).
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for colorectal cancer prevention. Details: Although evidence from individual population studies is mixed (9222,9223,14498,90176,90178,90181,102718), meta-analyses of population research suggest that a high intake of green tea is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer (36416,102716). The highest intake of green tea is associated with a 16% reduced risk when compared with the lowest; however, the benefit appears to be specific to colon cancer, not rectal cancer (102716). When subdivided according to gender, evidence from case-control research suggests that green tea is associated with a reduced risk of colon and rectal cancer for females (54096).
• Common cold. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for the common cold. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking two capsules of a specific formulation (ImmuneGuard, Nutraceutical Holdings LLC) containing L-theanine (Suntheanine, Taiyo International) plus epigallocatechin gallate (Sunphenon, Taiyo International) twice daily for 3 months reduces cold or flu symptoms and duration of symptoms when compared with placebo in healthy adults (53754).
• Crohn disease. Although there has been interest in using oral green tea for Crohn disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of green tea for this condition.
• Dementia. It is unclear if drinking green tea is beneficial for dementia prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational studies in over 20,000 adults suggests that the risk of any cognitive deficit (including mild cognitive impairment and dementia) is associated with a 6% reduction per cup of green tea consumed daily (107829). Some population research in elderly individuals suggests that drinking green tea at least once per week is associated with a 53% reduced incidence of dementia or mild cognitive impairment when compared to not consuming green tea (104598). Other population research in adults ages 40-74 years suggests that drinking at least 600 mL of green tea daily is not associated with a reduced risk of developing dementia when compared with drinking less than 60 mL daily. However, there is a modest reduction in dementia risk specifically in individuals ages 60-69 years (107164). A prospective, observational study suggests that consumption of tea, including both green and black tea, of at least 4 cups, in conjunction with 0.5-1 cups of coffee, daily is associated with a 30% reduced risk of dementia when compared with not drinking tea or coffee. Also, drinking 2-3 cups daily of both tea and coffee is associated with a 28% reduced risk of dementia when compared with not drinking tea and coffee (107204). Any association between drinking green tea specifically and developing dementia cannot be determined from this study.
• Dental plaque. It is unclear if oral or topical green tea is beneficial for reducing dental plaque. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that use of oral or topical products containing green tea modestly reduces dental plaque when compared with control products, including triclosan toothpaste, placebo, and chlorhexidine rinse. However, a sub-group analysis shows that a green tea rinse is no more effective than a chlorhexidine rinse. Green tea products in these studies included mouth rinse, paste, tea, capsules, and strips (107156). Many of these studies are limited by a lack of clear blinding. A more recent clinical study in children ages 10-14 years with plaque and gingivitis shows that using a mouthwash containing green tea extract 5% twice daily, alone or at half strength with ginger extract, for 30 days reduces plaque and gingivitis severity. The mouthwash containing the combination of green tea and ginger extract was most effective, and the green tea extract alone was at least as effective as chlorhexidine (107163).
• Depression. It is unclear if drinking green tea is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Epidemiological research suggests that consuming green tea is associated with a reduced prevalence of depression and depressive symptoms. In Japanese adults, drinking four or more cups of green tea daily is associated with a 44% to 51% lower prevalence of mild to severe depression when compared to consuming one cup or less daily (90160,90163). A meta-analysis suggests that the highest green tea consumption is associated with a 34% reduced risk of depressive symptoms when compared with the lowest (111024). Other research in a general population of Chinese adults suggests that consuming at least 1 cup of green tea daily is associated with a 22% decreased risk of depressive symptoms over 2 years when compared with almost never consuming green tea. However, there is no association between depressive symptoms and less frequent green tea consumption in this population (111023).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if drinking green tea or taking green tea extract is beneficial for the prevention of diabetes or the improvement of glycemic control. Details: Epidemiological research has found that Japanese adults who consume 6 or more cups of green tea daily have a 33% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared to those who consume one cup or less daily. The risk reduction appears to be more pronounced in females when compared with males (14313). Also, epidemiological research has found that Chinese adults who consume at least one cup of green tea per week have a 59% to 77% lower risk of impaired fasting glucose when compared to those who consume less than one cup per week (90149). Other epidemiological research has found that consumption of any amount of green tea daily by Chinese adults is associated with an 8% reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with never drinking green tea (107165). In contrast, some epidemiological research in Chinese adults has found that green tea consumption is associated with a 20% increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with non-green tea drinkers. A dose-response relationship was found for both the amount and duration of tea consumed (107170). Also, clinical research in patients with prediabetes shows that drinking one cup of green tea three times daily for 14 weeks does not improve fasting blood glucose or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) when compared to control (90174). There is inconsistent evidence regarding the effects of green tea in patients with type 2 diabetes. Epidemiological research suggests that drinking at least 4 cups of green tea daily is associated with a 40% reduction in mortality risk when compared to not drinking green tea (104589). Other epidemiological research in patients with type 2 diabetes has found that consumption of any amount of green tea daily is associated with a 10% reduction in mortality risk when compared to never drinking green tea. However, there was no association between green tea intake and the incidence of developing macrovascular or microvascular complications (107165). Meta-analyses of clinical research show that green tea extract and green tea catechins reduce fasting blood glucose when compared to control when patients with type 2 diabetes, borderline diabetes, or normal blood glucose status are evaluated together (90154,90187). However, a meta-analysis of up to 15 mainly small clinical trials involving patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking green tea does not affect fasting blood glucose or insulin or improve insulin resistance or glucose control when compared with placebo. Most included studies used green tea or its extract in doses of 400-10,000 mg daily for 8-16 weeks (104604). Also, clinical research shows that taking green tea extract daily for up to 16 weeks does not improve blood glucose, HbA1c, or insulin when compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes or borderline diabetes (37678,37781,54035). Some research has evaluated the effect of green tea on other outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. One meta-analysis shows that taking green tea extract modestly reduces fasting triglyceride levels when compared with control. This benefit was seen with doses of at least 800 mg daily taken for longer than 8 weeks. This dose and duration reduces levels of total cholesterol, but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels (102715). Another meta-analysis shows that taking green tea modestly reduces body weight, body mass index (BM), and body fat. A sub-analysis shows that these benefits occur in studies lasting more than 8 weeks, using doses of up to 800 mg daily, and in patients who were overweight. There was no effect on waist circumference. Most patients included in the analysis were overweight or had obesity (104610).
• Diabetic neuropathy. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for improving diabetic neuropathy symptoms. Details: Clinical research in patients with mild-to-moderate diabetic peripheral neuropathy shows that taking decaffeinated green tea extract 500 mg three times daily for 16 weeks modestly reduces neural pain and dysfunction, as well as overall symptom severity, when compared with placebo (107159).
• Down syndrome. It is unclear if oral green tea is able to alter facial morphology in children with Down syndrome.
• Down syndrome. There was no effect in children aged 4-18 years (107167). This study is limited by its observational design. The dosage, time of onset, and duration of treatment differed between individuals.
• Dry eye. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for improving dry eye symptoms. Details: In patients with mild to moderate dry eye and meibomian gland dysfunction, preliminary clinical research shows that applying green tea extract into the eyes three times daily for one month, in addition to artificial tears three times daily, improves symptoms of dry eye. Symptoms of itching, burning, foreign body sensation, and redness were improved by a moderate amount over artificial tears alone (104612).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if drinking green tea is beneficial for preventing dysmenorrhea symptoms. Details: Population research has found that drinking green tea is associated with a 37% reduced odds of experiencing dysmenorrhea and a 58% reduced odds of having moderate-to-severe dysmenorrhea when compared with not drinking green tea (102729).
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if drinking green tea is beneficial for preventing esophageal cancer; the available research is conflicting. Details: Although some epidemiological evidence and observational studies have found that drinking green tea is associated with a reduced risk of esophageal cancer, most meta-analyses do not support this finding in a mixed group of adults (1457,36542,90169,90185,90186,102004,102716,107154). Meta-analyses of epidemiological studies suggest that drinking green tea is associated with a 54% reduction in the risk of esophageal cancer, or a 21% reduced odds per cup of green tea consumed daily, only in females (90169,90185,102004,107154). Also, some epidemiological research found that drinking green tea that is very hot is associated with an increased risk of esophageal cancer (53828). In addition, drinking decaffeinated green tea 5 mg daily for 12 months does not seem to be an effective treatment for patients diagnosed with esophageal precancerous lesions (53702).
• Fractures. It is unclear if drinking green tea reduces fracture risk. Details: Population research has found that consumption of green tea is associated with a 12% lower risk of any fracture and 20% lower risk of hip fracture when compared with no tea consumption (99800).
• Gastric cancer. Evidence evaluating an association between green tea consumption and gastric cancer risk is conflicting. Details: Most meta-analyses of epidemiological studies suggest that green tea consumption is not associated with gastric cancer risk (53767,53813,90181,102716). Although the most recent meta-analysis of epidemiological research suggests that drinking green tea regularly is associated with up to a 9% reduced risk of gastric cancer when compared with non-regular consumption, sub-analyses suggest that there is no association between gastric cancer and intake of specific amounts of green tea up to at least 3 cups daily (111025). Also, other population research suggests that drinking 10 or more cups of green tea daily is associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer (8903,9222,9225,9226,9227), while consuming less than 10 cups daily is not consistently associated with a reduced risk (7033,9223,54090). The association between drinking green tea and gastric cancer-related mortality has also been investigated, A large-scale population study in Japan suggests that drinking 5 or more cups of green tea daily is not associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer-related mortality when compared to drinking less than one cup daily (14498). Discrepancies might be related to the temperature of the green tea. The most recent meta-analysis suggests that intake of cold or warm green tea, and not hot green tea, is associated with a modest reduction in gastric cancer risk (111025).
• Gingivitis. It is unclear if oral or topical green tea is beneficial for gingivitis. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that use of oral or topical products containing green tea modestly reduces gingivitis and gingival bleeding when compared with control products, including triclosan toothpaste, placebo, and chlorhexidine rinse. However, a sub-group analysis shows that a green tea rinse is no more effective than a chlorhexidine rinse. Green tea products used in these studies were heterogeneous and included mouth rinse, gel, paste, tea, strips, and capsules (107156). Many of these studies are limited by a lack of clear blinding. A more recent clinical study in children ages 10-14 years with plaque and gingivitis shows that using a mouthwash containing green tea extract 5% twice daily, alone or at half-strength with ginger extract, for 30 days reduces plaque and gingivitis severity. The mouthwash containing the combination of green tea and ginger extract was most effective, and the green tea extract alone was at least as effective as chlorhexidine (107163).
• Headache. Although there has been interest in using oral green tea for headache, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of green tea for this condition.
• Hypertension. The evidence is mixed as to whether drinking green tea reduces the risk of hypertension and whether oral green tea lowers blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Details: Some epidemiological research from China shows that drinking 120-599 mL of green tea or oolong tea daily is associated with a 46% lower risk of developing hypertension when compared with non-habitual tea drinkers; drinking more than 600 mL daily is associated with a 65% reduced risk (12518). In contrast, drinking green tea daily is associated with a 38% increased odds of having hypertension when compared with never drinking green tea in elderly Chinese males, but not females (107166). Green tea may help lower blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension; however, the evidence is mixed, and any reductions appear to be small. A meta-analysis of two clinical trials in patients with hypertension shows that drinking green tea for 4-16 weeks reduces systolic, but not diastolic, blood pressure by about 6 mmHg (104583). Meta-analyses in patients with or without hypertension, including overweight or obese adults, suggest that green tea reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 1-3 mmHg (90146,90155,90161,98423,102726,111018). Some studies used green tea, made by boiling a 3 gram tea bag with 150 mL water and then waiting for 5 minutes and consuming three times daily approximately 2 hours after each meal for 4 weeks (90159), or green tea extract up to 1500 mg daily for up to 12 weeks (111018), including a specific product (Olimp Labs) 379 mg, taken daily with the morning meal for 3 months (54068).
• Hypotension. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for postprandial hypotension in elderly adults. Details: Some research shows that consuming caffeinated beverages increases blood pressure in elderly people with postprandial hypotension (11834,11835). Also, preliminary clinical research shows that drinking 400 mL of green tea before lunch increases postprandial systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 15 mmHg and 6 mmHg, respectively, in older elderly people with postprandial hypotension (89482).
• Infertility. Oral green tea has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in females with a history of problems conceiving shows that taking three capsules daily of a proprietary blend of Vitex agnus-castus extract (standardized to 0.5% agnusides), green tea extract (standardized to 50% phenols), L-arginine, vitamins E, B6, and B12, folate, iron, magnesium, zinc, and selenium (FertilityBlend, The Daily Wellness Company) for three menstrual cycles increases the rate of pregnancy at three months by 61% when compared with placebo (41479).
• Influenza. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for preventing the flu. Details: A meta-analysis of five clinical trials in individuals with or without prior influenza vaccination shows that use of green tea catechins, either in capsule form or as a gargled liquid, reduces the rate of influenza infections by 33% when compared with control. Also, a meta-analysis of observational research has found that gargling with or consuming green tea containing catechins is associated with a 48% reduced risk of influenza when compared with not taking green tea catechins. More information is needed to compare the efficacy of the different forms of green tea catechins (107152). Some epidemiological research not included in this meta-analysis has found that drinking at least 5 cups of green tea weekly is associated with a 32% reduced odds of developing confirmed influenza when compared with drinking less than one cup weekly. A sub-group analysis suggests that this association is only evident in individuals who had not received the influenza vaccination (104608). Conversely, other preliminary research shows that gargling with green tea at least three times daily for 90 days does not prevent influenza in high school students when compared with water (90150). Green tea has also been evaluated in combination with theanine. One small study shows that taking a combination of green tea catechins (THEA-FLAN 90S, Ito-en Co) 378 mg standardized to 270 mg of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) with theanine 210 mg daily for 5 months reduces the risk of developing clinically defined influenza, but not laboratory-confirmed influenza infection, when compared with placebo (54021). Other preliminary clinical research in healthy adults shows that taking two capsules of a specific formulation (ImmuneGuard, Nutraceutical Holdings LLC) containing L-theanine (Suntheanine, Taiyo International) plus EGCG (Sunphenon, Taiyo International) twice daily for 3 months reduces the number of subjects with cold or flu symptoms and the number of days with symptoms when compared with placebo (53754).
• Japanese cedar pollinosis. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for preventing Japanese cedar pollinosis symptoms. Details: In patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis, clinical research shows that drinking Benifuuki green tea drink 350 mL containing O-methylated catechin 34-40 mg daily beginning 6-10 weeks before pollen exposure until the end of pollen season can reduce nasal and ocular symptoms. Clinical research compared the "benifuuki" drink enriched in O-methylated EGCG with that of another green tea "yabukita," containing no O-methylated EGCG (53884,90156).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). It is unclear if drinking green tea prevents kidney stones. Details: Population research suggests that drinking green tea is associated with a reduced risk of having kidney stones. This risk was 22% lower in males and 16% lower in females when compared with never or former green tea drinkers (104613).
• Leukemia. It is unclear if drinking green tea is beneficial for leukemia prevention. Details: Although some large epidemiological studies suggest that drinking green tea reduces the risk of leukemia by 51% to 80% (53799,90183,102723), a meta-analysis of generally low-quality population research shows a variable association between green tea intake and risk of leukemia (102716).
• Liver cancer. It is unclear if drinking green tea is beneficial for liver cancer prevention. Details: Two meta-analyses of epidemiological research suggest that green tea consumption is associated with a reduced risk of liver cancer (97132,111016). The most recent meta-analysis in approximately 1.5 million adults in Asia, North America, and Europe suggests that the highest intake of green tea is associated with a 20% reduced risk of liver cancer when compared with the lowest. The most benefit was associated with consumption of at least 4 cups daily (111016). Another meta-analysis that included studies conducted in Japan, China, or Singapore suggests that higher green tea consumption is associated with a 12% reduced incidence of liver cancer when compared with the lowest consumption of green tea. However, the benefit appears to be limited to females; green tea consumption was not associated with a reduced risk of liver cancer in males (97132). A large epidemiological study in Chinese females also suggests that green tea consumption is associated with a reduced risk of liver cancer. Consuming a cumulative intake of 30 kg dried green tea leaves is associated with a 46% reduced risk of primary liver cancer over a median of 18 years when compared with never drinking green tea (111030). In contrast, some individual epidemiological studies suggest that green tea consumption is not associated with a reduced risk of liver cancer in Japanese individuals (90181,102716).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if drinking green tea is beneficial for lung cancer prevention. Details: Individual observational studies and meta-analyses of population research have yielded conflicting evidence about the effects of green tea on lung cancer risk (13190,14498,53829,90177,102716). Although one meta-analysis of population research suggests that the highest intake of green tea does not reduce lung cancer risk when compared to the lowest intakes (102716), other analyses suggest that increasing green tea consumption by two cups daily is associated with an 18% decreased risk of lung cancer, and that drinking 7-10 cups of green tea daily is associated with an 18% to 33% reduced risk of lung cancer when compared with drinking less than one cup daily (53829,90177).
• Mental alertness. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for mental alertness. Details: Green tea contains caffeine. Consumption of caffeinated beverages seems to prevent a decline in alertness and cognitive capacity when consumed throughout the day (4221,4224). Also, combining caffeine with glucose as an "energy drink" seems to improve mental performance better than placebo or either caffeine or glucose alone (13732). However, there is mixed evidence regarding the effects of green tea on mental alertness.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for improving metabolic parameters in people with this condition. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking green tea extract 1000 mg daily or drinking four cups of green tea daily for 8 weeks does not improve metabolic syndrome features, including waist circumference, blood pressure, cholesterol levels, or blood sugar in obese patients with metabolic syndrome when compared to control (53995).
• Multiple myeloma. It is unclear if drinking green tea is beneficial for multiple myeloma prevention. Details: Population research suggests that drinking at least 5 cups of green tea each day is not associated with a reduced risk of multiple myeloma when compared with never drinking green tea (102723).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). It is unclear if drinking green tea prevents MI or if drinking green tea prevents mortality in patients with a previous MI. Details: When compared with drinking less than one cup of green tea daily, epidemiological research in a population at high risk of coronary artery disease has found that drinking more than three cups of green tea daily is associated with a 49% reduced odds of having a past MI as determined by a coronary angiography. A sub-group analysis found that these odds only occurred in individuals consuming both fruits and vegetables more than four times weekly and not in individuals consuming fruits or vegetables less often (104588). In addition, observational research has found that drinking either 1-3 cups or at least 4 cups of green tea daily is associated with 19% and 32% lower odds of MI, respectively, when compared to drinking less than 1 cup daily (97134). In patients with a previous MI, drinking at least 7 cups of green tea daily is associated with a 53% reduced odds of all-cause mortality over a median of 18.5 years when compared with not drinking green tea (107160).
• Nasopharyngeal cancer. It is unclear if drinking green tea is beneficial for nasopharyngeal cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that the highest intake of green tea is associated with a 51% reduced risk of nasopharyngeal cancer when compared with the lowest intake (102716).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: Clinical research shows that drinking green tea 700 mL containing 1080 mg of catechins daily for 12 weeks does not affect body weight or body mass index (BMI), but does reduce body fat percentage from 34% to 32%, when compared with drinking either green tea 700 mL containing 200 mg of catechins or a control tea. Also, the liver-to-spleen attenuation ratio increased by 11% when compared with baseline (90168). Meta-analyses of four studies in patients with NAFLD show that taking green tea extract 500-1000 mg daily or green tea catechins 600 mg daily improves liver function tests when compared with placebo (98459,102720). One meta-analysis also shows that these doses improve BMI, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when compared with placebo (98459).
• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is unclear if drinking green tea is beneficial for non-Hodgkin lymphoma prevention. Details: Population research has found that drinking at least 3.5 cups of green tea daily is not associated with a reduced risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma when compared with never drinking or drinking less than 1 cup of green tea daily (102005,102723).
• Obesity. Evidence for the use of green tea products for weight loss is conflicting. The conflicting findings may be related to the caffeine and catechin content of the studied products, as well as the physical activity level of the individual. Details: Many clinical studies show that drinking green tea or taking green tea extract that contains caffeine (about 70-200 mg) and high levels of catechins (about 576-886 mg) daily for 12-24 weeks modestly improves weight loss when compared to control in overweight individuals or patients with obesity (8114,37725,53906,90184). A meta-analysis of 25 randomized clinical trials shows that taking green tea extract containing caffeine results in an additional weight loss of 1.8 kg when compared with a control group not taking green tea extract (102719). In addition, a meta-analysis of clinical trials shows that taking green tea reduces body weight by 0.4 kg in mainly overweight individuals with type 2 diabetes (104610). Some research also shows that drinking green tea or taking green tea extract containing high levels of catechins but no caffeine reduces weight and visceral fat in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when used for up to 12 weeks (53994,54039,90184). In these clinical trials, the following doses have been used: two capsules of green tea extract daily standardized to containing 870 mg of catechins (460 mg EGCG) or 4 cups of green tea daily standardized to contain 928 mg of catechins (440 mg EGCG) for 8 weeks (53994); a specific decaffeinated green tea extract (Sunphenon 90LB, Taiyo Kagaku Ltd.) 530 mg twice daily for 6 weeks (54039); catechin-enriched green tea beverages providing 234-886 mg of catechins once or twice daily for approximately 3 months (37705,53906,90184); a specific green tea extract (AR25, Exolise, Arkopharma), taken as four capsules standardized to contain 375 mg of catechins (epigallocatechin gallate 270 mg) in two divided doses daily for 12 weeks (8114). Some research has also shown weight loss benefits of multi-ingredient products or diets containing green tea. Multi-ingredient products have included an herbal mixture of garcinia extract 650 mg, green tea extract 100 mg, coffee extract 75 mg, and banaba extract 25 mg per tablet (IQP-GC-101, InQpharm Europe Ltd.) 30 minutes before meals twice daily for 12 weeks (90137) and a specific product (Sanavita Industry, Piracicaba) containing powdered green tea (40 mg of caffeine), orange pulp, vitamin C, zinc, and selenium, taken as 20 grams in two divided doses daily for 8 weeks (90134). Drinking green tea has also been used as part of a Mediterranean diet also including Wolffia globose (109888). However, many studies show conflicting results (37715,37753,54035,98419,98420,98422). Reasons for these inconsistent findings are not entirely clear, but may relate to the use of decaffeinated green tea products, the use of green tea products containing low catechin amounts, or the presence and type of concomitant exercise. Some research shows that green tea extract containing a lower catechin amount (491 mg daily) or decaffeinated green tea products do not improve weight loss when compared with placebo in patients with obesity (37753,54035,98419). One meta-analysis of 15 clinical studies including about 1240 patients with obesity shows that using green tea products that are decaffeinated does not improve body weight, body mass index, or waist circumference when compared with control, while green tea products containing catechins 576-714 mg daily and caffeine do improve these outcomes (16892). Taking green tea after weight loss does not seem to improve weight maintenance when compared with control (14428,54076). Other clinical research shows that green tea does not improve weight loss in individuals with obesity who are already participating in exercise, such as walking and interval sprinting (37715,98420). In contrast, another small clinical study shows that taking green tea 500 mg daily for 10 weeks while participating in HIIT improves weight, body fat percentage, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels when compared with either green tea or HIIT alone. However, it appears that the majority of these improvements are due to participation in HIIT (100201). There is also some limited research in children. One small clinical trial in obese children ages 6-16 years shows that taking green tea providing 576 mg catechins daily for 24 weeks modestly reduces waist circumference, as well as systolic blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, when compared with taking green tea providing 75 mg catechins daily. However, there were no significant difference between groups for other anthropometric measures or cardiovascular risk factors (37743). Another clinical trial in obese females ages 6-10 years who were also given diet and exercise advice shows that taking decaffeinated green tea polyphenols 400 mg daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces fat mass, but does not affect other anthropometric measures, when compared with placebo. Also, taking green tea polyphenols modestly reduces ovary volume, but has no effect on other measures of early puberty, such as breast development, uterine volume, or levels of sex hormones (107162).
• Oral cancer. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for oral cancer prevention. Details: Meta-analyses of epidemiological research suggest that the highest intake of green tea is associated with a 20% to 29% reduction in risk of oral cancer when compared with the lowest intake (90180,102716). Also, preliminary clinical research in patients with high-risk oral premalignant lesions shows that taking a green tea extract 500-1000 mg/m2 three times daily after meals for 12 weeks increases the rate of clinical and histological response when compared with placebo (53936).
• Oral leukoplakia. It is unclear if drinking green tea and concomitantly applying topical green tea to lesions is beneficial for oral leukoplakia. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with oral leukoplakia shows that drinking 3 grams of a mixed tea product containing green tea daily for 6 months, while also topically applying a 10% mixed tea product in the mouth three times daily, reduces oral lesion size by about 38%, compared with a 3% increase in those taking placebo. It is not clear if this effect is due to green tea, the other ingredients, or the combination (4213).
• Osteopenia. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for preventing osteopenia. Details: Population research suggests that drinking green tea for 10 years is associated with increased bone mineral density (8116). Other population research suggests that drinking less than one cup of green tea daily is associated with an 81% to 85% increased odds of having osteopenia when compared with drinking green tea 1-3 times daily (111026). Preliminary clinical research in postmenopausal adults with osteopenia shows that taking capsules containing green tea polyphenols 500 mg (233 mg as epigallocatechin-3-gallate or EGCG) daily, possibly while practicing tai chi 60 minutes three times weekly, for 24 weeks improves serum markers of bone turnover and muscle strength when compared to baseline (54040). However, the results from this study are limited by a lack of control group and the fact that diagnostic measures of bone health, such as T-score or Z-score, were not assessed.
• Osteoporosis. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for preventing osteoporosis. Details: Population research suggests that drinking green tea for 10 years is associated with increased bone mineral density (8116). Other population research suggests that drinking less than one cup of green tea daily is associated with up to a 91% increased odds of having osteoporosis when compared with drinking green tea 1-3 times daily (111026). More recent clinical research shows that taking decaffeinated green tea extract supplying approximately 1315 mg of catechins (843 mg as EGCG) daily does not improve bone mineral density, T-score, or Z-score in postmenopausal adults (98419).
• Overall mortality. Some population research suggests that drinking green tea may reduce the risk of overall mortality by a small amount. Details: A meta-analysis of population research in Japanese adults found that drinking at least 5 cups of green tea daily is associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality when compared with drinking less than 1 cup daily (102002). Another meta-analysis of population research found that each one cup per day increase in green tea consumption is associated with a 3% reduced risk of all-cause mortality (102728). However, more recent population research has found that although drinking green tea is associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality in patients with a previous MI and stroke, drinking as much as 7 cups of green tea daily is not associated with a reduced odds of all-cause mortality over a median of 18.5 years in individuals with no history of stroke or MI when compared with not drinking green tea (107160).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if drinking green tea is beneficial for pancreatic cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that the highest intake of green tea is not associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer when compared with the lowest intake (102716). However, one epidemiological study suggests that drinking green tea is associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer (54096).
• Parkinson disease. Although consuming caffeinated beverages might reduce the risk of developing Parkinson disease, it is unclear if oral green tea prevents or improves symptoms in people with this condition. Details: There is some evidence from large-scale epidemiological studies that the incidence of Parkinson disease decreases with increased consumption of caffeinated beverages such as coffee, tea, and cola. For men, the effects seem to be dose related. Men consuming a total of 421-2716 mg of caffeine (approximately 5-33 cups of tea) from any source daily seem to have the greatest reduction in risk. However, there seems to be a significant reduction in risk even with consumption of as little as 124-208 mg caffeine daily (approximately one to three cups tea) (6022). In females, the effects do not seem to be dose related. Moderate consumption of approximately 1-4 cups daily seems to provide the most reduction in risk (1238). It is unclear if consuming green tea is more or less effective than other caffeinated beverages for reducing Parkinson disease risk.
• Periodontitis. It is unclear if oral or topical green tea is beneficial for improving oral health or improving periodontal disease. Details: Epidemiological research has found that intake of green tea is inversely associated with symptoms of periodontal disease, including probing depth, attachment loss, and bleeding on probing (53844). A small clinical trial shows that taking green tea extract 1.55% by weight in chewable candy for 28 days appears to reduce plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation (7594). A small clinical trial in patients with chronic periodontitis shows that applying a gel containing green tea extract 1 gram/100 mL into the periodontal pocket as an adjunct to scaling improves gingivitis, periodontal disease, and clinical attachment by 7%, 112%, and 116%, respectively, when compared with placebo gel (90135). A meta-analysis of low-quality clinical research also shows that use of oral or topical products containing green tea modestly improve clinical attachment when compared with control products, including triclosan toothpaste and placebo. Green tea products included gel, paste, and tea (107156).
• Pneumonia. It is unclear if drinking green tea is beneficial for pneumonia prevention. Details: Epidemiological research in Japanese females has found that consuming green tea is associated with a lower risk of death from pneumonia when compared to those who do not drink green tea (53897). However, other epidemiological research in hospitalized elderly Japanese adults has found that there is no association between green tea consumption during the past month and prevalence of pneumonia at time of hospitalization (107161).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for PCOS. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 small clinical trials shows that taking green tea modestly reduces weight in patients with PCOS when compared with placebo. However, there was no effect on other endpoints including body mass index (BMI), percent body fat, or waist or hip circumference. Three studies in the meta-analysis used green tea 1000-2000 mg/daily in tablets or capsules; the other study used green tea powder providing epigallocatechin gallate 1620 mg daily (111019). However, the included studies were small and utilized heterogeneous dosing regimens.
• Postoperative pain. It is unclear if rinsing the mouth with green tea is beneficial for postoperative pain associated with molar removal. Details: In patients undergoing third molar extraction, a small clinical trial shows that using 15 mL of a mouthwash containing green tea extract 5 grams/100 mL twice daily, beginning the day after surgical removal of impacted molars and continuing for 7 days thereafter, reduces pain by 60% and analgesic use during the first three days when compared with using a mouthwash that does not contain green tea (90141).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if drinking green tea or taking green tea catechins by mouth is beneficial for prostate cancer treatment or prevention. Details: Green tea catechins have been evaluated for reducing prostate cancer risk in high-risk patients (14127,98421,102716). A meta-analysis of results from three clinical trials shows that taking green tea catechins 400-600 mg daily for 12-30 months reduces the risk of prostate cancer by approximately 62% when compared with placebo in high-risk patients (98421). However, another meta-analysis including two of these studies plus one additional does not show that taking green tea catechins reduces the incidence of prostate cancer in high-risk patients (102716). Most population research has found that drinking higher amounts of green tea is not associated with a reduced risk for prostate cancer when compared with those who never or rarely drink green tea (14128,54036,53741,53753,90153,90181,98421). However, one meta-analysis of population research found that people who drink very high amounts of green tea (7-15 cups daily) have a 19% to 44% reduced risk of prostate cancer (98421). Another population study found that higher green tea intake is associated with a reduced risk of advanced, but not overall, prostate cancer risk (53753). In April 2012, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that it would allow a qualified health claim stating that consuming green tea may reduce the risk of prostate cancer, although the FDA has concluded that there is very little scientific evidence to support this claim (102106). Additionally, most clinical research shows that drinking large amounts of green tea or taking green tea extract does not reduce disease progression in patients with prostate cancer (11366,53726). Green tea and green tea catechins have also been evaluated for reducing prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels. A meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with or at risk of prostate cancer shows that taking green tea or green tea extract for 3 weeks to 12 months does not modify PSA levels when compared with water or placebo. However, sub-analyses suggest that there is significant heterogeneity with respect to findings between geographical locations, with some evidence of benefit in studies conducted in the US (107155).
• Radiation dermatitis. It is unclear if topical green tea is beneficial for preventing radiation dermatitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients undergoing radiotherapy after breast cancer surgery shows that spraying epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) over the radiation field prevents the development of at least moderate severity radiation dermatitis by 30% when compared with saline as placebo. Also, occurrence of symptoms was delayed by about 2.7 days and symptom severity was reduced. EGCG 660 mcmol/L was sprayed 3 times daily from the first day of radiation until 2 weeks after completion at 0.05 mL per squared cm (111031). The interpretation of these results is limited by the unbalanced treatment groups.
• Radiation-induced diarrhea. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for reducing diarrhea associated with radiotherapy. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking a green tea tablet (Camgreen, Iran Giahessence Pharmacy Co.) 450 mg daily for 5 weeks during pelvic irradiation reduces the frequency of diarrhea in patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment. In the fifth week of treatment, 19% of patients taking green tea had diarrhea, compared with approximately 62% of those taking placebo (104614).
• Radiation-induced nausea and vomiting. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for reducing vomiting associated with radiotherapy. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking a green tea tablet (Camgreen, Iran Giahessence Pharmacy Co.) 450 mg daily for 5 weeks during pelvic irradiation does not reduce the frequency of vomiting when compared with placebo in patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment (104614).
• Renal cell carcinoma. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for preventing kidney cancer. Details: Epidemiological research suggests that green tea intake is not associated with risk of kidney cancer over a mean of 19 years in Japanese adults. However, in females, consuming at least 5 cups of green tea daily, but not lesser amounts, is associated with a 55% reduced risk of kidney cancer when compared with rare intake (111022).
• Skin cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral or topical green tea for skin cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of green tea for this condition.
• Stress. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for stress reduction. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific brand of green tea extract (Teavigo, DSM) 300 mg orally for 7 days reduces stress and increases calmness when compared with placebo in healthy individuals (54055).
• Stroke. It is unclear if consumption of green tea is associated with a reduced risk of stroke or with reduced all-cause mortality in patients with a previous stroke. Details: Large-scale population research in Japanese individuals suggests that consuming at least 3-5 cups of green tea daily is associated with a reduced risk of cerebrovascular mortality when compared with drinking less than 1 cup daily. This association appears to be primarily related to a decrease in risk for cerebral infarction or hemorrhage (14498,54080,102002). Other population research suggests that drinking 1-3 cups of green tea daily is associated with a 36% reduced odds of stroke when compared with drinking less than 1 cup daily, while drinking 4 or more cups daily has no effect. Also, green tea consumption was not associated with reduced incidence of cerebral hemorrhage or infarction in this study (97134). Meta-analyses of population research suggest that an increase of 1 cup per day in green tea consumption is associated with a 6% reduced risk of stroke or cerebral hemorrhage (102728,111021). A prospective, observational study also suggests that higher intake of tea, including green and black tea, of at least 2 cups daily is associated with a 16% reduced risk of stroke when compared with not drinking tea. This study also found that drinking 2-3 cups daily of each tea and coffee is associated with a 38% reduced risk of stroke when compared with not drinking tea and coffee. The combination of 0.5-1 cups of coffee and 2-3 cups of tea daily, but not tea alone, was associated with a 50% reduced risk of post-stroke dementia when compared with not drinking tea and coffee (107204). In patients with a previous stroke, drinking at least 3 cups of green tea daily is associated with a 48% to 62% reduced odds of all-cause mortality over a median of 18.5 years when compared with not drinking green tea (107160).
• Sunburn. It is unclear if oral or topical green tea is beneficial for preventing ultraviolet radiation-induced erythema. Details: A meta-analysis of three small clinical trials shows that taking green tea catechins 540-1402 mg daily for 6 to 12 weeks has a small to moderate protective effect against ultraviolet radiation-induced erythema when compared with placebo, especially at lower doses of ultraviolet radiation. A single topical dose of green tea ingredients may also be beneficial, but data is limited (107153).
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for SLE. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking green tea extract 500 mg (containing 22% polyphenols) twice daily for 3 months modestly improves disease activity, general health, and vitality when compared with placebo (97136).
• Tinea pedis. It is unclear if a topical green tea footbath is beneficial for athlete's foot. Details: In bedridden, elderly patients with cognitive deficiency, use of a footbath containing a 0.1% green tea extract for 15 minutes once daily for 12 weeks does not improve symptoms of athlete's foot, but does improve skin condition, when compared with a footbath not containing green tea. The green tea extract Sunphenon BG-3 (Taiyo Kagaku Co. Ltd., Yokkaichi), prepared by dissolving 5 grams of the Sunphenon BG-3 product in 5 liters of water to create a 0.1% green tea solution, was used (90151).
• Ulcerative colitis. It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for ulcerative colitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis shows that taking a specific green tea product (Polyphenon E, Mitsui-Norin) 200 mg or 400 mg twice daily for 8 weeks may increase the number of people who respond to therapy and achieve remission when compared with placebo. After treatment, 10 of 15 patients in the green tea extract group responded to therapy and 8 of 15 patients achieved remission, compared with 0 in the placebo group (90140).
• Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). It is unclear if gargling and swallowing green tea is beneficial for reducing URTI symptoms. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that gargling and swallowing green tea (Morgentau, Ronnefeld KG) 100 mL daily over 4 days is less effective than proprietary labdanum lozenges (CYSTUS052, Dr Pandalis Urheimische Medizin GmbH & Co.) for upper respiratory tract symptoms in patients with URTIs (53867).
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). It is unclear if oral green tea is beneficial for reducing UTI symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in females with acute uncomplicated cystitis shows that adding green tea 2000 mg daily for 3 days to treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole reduces symptoms of cystitis when compared with placebo (99799). This study is limited by its small size and the lack of information on antibiotic resistance in each treatment group.
• Wrinkled skin. It is unclear if oral or topical green tea is beneficial for wrinkles. Details: Some preliminary clinical research shows that taking green tea catechins 175 mg twice daily for two years does not reduce signs of photo-aging of the skin in females with facial photo-aging when compared with placebo (53873). However, using a combination of topical green tea 10% cream and oral green tea extract 300 mg twice daily for 8 weeks seems to improve skin elasticity in females with moderate photo-aging based on microscopic analysis, although the clinical appearance of the skin does not seem to significantly improve (53731). Other preliminary clinical research shows that consuming one liter of a beverage with green tea polyphenols for 12 weeks improves skin elasticity, roughness, and hydration in middle-aged females when compared with placebo (54030). More evidence is needed to rate green tea for these uses.

(Read more about GREEN TEA)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Iodine deficiency. Oral iodine supplements, including iodized salt, are effective for improving iodine status and reducing goiter size in adults and children. Iodine supplementation is also recommended during pregnancy in areas at risk for iodine deficiency. Details: Iodine deficiency is associated with several adverse outcomes. The earliest clinical symptom of iodine deficiency is low circulating thyroid hormone and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), followed by thyroid goiter (7135,16747,91398). Iodine deficiency and subsequent hypothyroidism can lead to anovulation, infertility, autoimmune thyroiditis, and gestational hypertension. Iodine deficiency is also associated with increased risk of thyroid cancer (16747). Clinical research shows that taking iodine supplements, including iodized salt, improves iodine status and reduces goiter size in adults with iodine deficiency (16747,55919,103071). Studies also show that taking iodine supplementation, including iodized salt, in areas of endemic iodine deficiency, reduces goiter size in children (16747,55919). When taken during pregnancy for iodine deficiency, iodine supplements and iodized salt reduce both maternal and newborn thyroid size and thyroglobulin; however, the effect on maternal TSH is inconsistent (91399,103070). Although some clinical studies and one analysis show that perinatal use of iodine has no effect on the incidence of thyroid disorders during pregnancy (91399,97240,97241), one analysis shows that iodine supplementation reduces the risk of postpartum hyperthyroidism by 68% when compared with placebo (97240). Taking iodine supplementation before 12 weeks' gestation appears to be more effective than when taken later in pregnancy. Perinatal iodine supplementation has no effect on preterm birth rate (97240,97241). Evidence is limited to females with mild-moderate iodine deficiency; the routine use of iodine supplementation during pregnancy has not been extensively studied. For example, the effect of perinatal supplementation on newborn neurocognitive development is conflicting and the evidence is generally low quality (55976,97241,105880,108706). Despite the limited evidence, iodine supplementation is recommended in areas at risk of deficiency.
• Radiation exposure. Oral potassium iodide prevents thyroid uptake of radioactive iodine. However, it does not protect against other sources of radiation. Details: Taking potassium iodide is effective for preventing the uptake of radioactive iodine by the thyroid (7517,7518). Doses of potassium iodide protect for about 24 hours. Therefore, it should be taken daily until the risk of radiation exposure no longer exists (17575,17576).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Conjunctivitis. Ophthalmic povidone-iodine solution seems to reduce the risk of conjunctivitis in infants. It may also improve the resolution of acute conjunctivitis in adults. It is unclear if it is beneficial in patients with adenoviral conjunctivitis. Details: A meta-analysis of low-quality clinical trials shows that povidone-iodine solutions are more effective than silver nitrate for preventing neonatal conjunctivitis. However, povidone-iodine solutions are not more effective than erythromycin or chloramphenicol (56084). Povidone-iodine in combination with dexamethasone also seems to be helpful in adults. A clinical trial in patients with acute viral conjunctivitis shows that applying povidone-iodine 0.6% with dexamethasone 0.1% four times daily for 4 days improves clinical symptoms and eradiation of viral counts when compared with placebo control (103075). A small clinical study in adults with adenoviral conjunctivitis shows that administering 4-5 drops of a povidone-iodine 5% eye drop solution within 4 days of symptom onset decreases viral load, mucoid discharge, and bulbar edema and redness on day 4 of a 21-day follow-up period, but at no other time points, when compared with a single dose of artificial tears (108705). Due to the single-dose nature of this study, the effects of continued administration are unclear.
• Diabetic foot ulcers. Topical iodine seems to help with the management of diabetic foot ulcer wounds. Details: A small clinical study in patients with diabetic foot ulcers shows that topically applying cadexomer iodine ointment (Iodosorb) for 12 weeks seems to improve healing to a similar degree as using standard treatment with gentamicin solution, streptokinase, and/or dry saline gauze (2200).
• Endometritis. Topical application of iodine prior to cesarean delivery seems to reduce the risk of endometritis. Details: A meta-analysis of eight clinical trials shows that vaginally applying povidone-iodine 1% to 10% solution immediately before cesarean delivery reduces the risk of post-cesarean endometritis by 62% when compared with saline or no cleaning. It also reduces postoperative fever by 13% and wound infection by 23% (99794). These findings are consistent with other meta-analyses (56080,103076). There seems to be no difference in benefit whether povidone-iodine 1%, 5%, or 10% is used. A network meta-analysis of clinical studies in patients having cesarean delivery suggests that povidone-iodine is no better at preventing endometritis than using chlorhexidine or metronidazole; however, there may not have been sufficient power to detect a difference (103076).
• Fibrocystic breast disease. Oral iodine seems to reduce breast pain in patients with fibrocystic breast disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with fibrocystic breast disease shows that taking sodium iodide, protein bound iodide, or molecular iodine for 6 months or longer improves mastalgia and reduces breast nodules when compared with baseline or control. Molecular iodine in doses of 70-90 mcg/kg appears to be more effective and better tolerated than the other forms (2197). Another clinical study in patients with cyclic mastalgia due to fibrocystic breast disease shows that taking tablets containing molecular iodine 3000-6000 mcg daily for 5 months reduces pain, tenderness, and nodularity in patients with cyclic mastalgia when compared with placebo. However, a lower dose of 1500 mcg daily does not appear to be beneficial (55960).
• Oral mucositis. Rinsing the mouth with a povidone-iodine solution may prevent oral mucositis from radiochemotherapy. Details: Small clinical studies in patients receiving radiation and chemotherapy for cancer shows that using an oral povidone-iodine rinse seems to reduce the risk for oral mucositis when compared with using sterile water (2198,2199).
• Periodontitis. Rinsing with povidone-iodine solution in addition to scaling and root planing seems to be modestly beneficial in patients with periodontitis. Details: A meta-analysis of mostly small clinical studies in patients with chronic periodontitis suggests that rinsing with povidone-iodine 0.1% to 10% during scaling and root planing modestly reduces the periodontal pocket depth when compared with rinsing with water or saline solution (56072).
• Postoperative infection. Povidone-iodine antisepsis prevents postoperative infection when compared with inactive controls such as normal saline and water. However, it is unclear how it compares to active controls such as chlorhexidine; practice guidelines are conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intraoperative application of povidone-iodine reduces the risk of surgical site infection by approximately 40% when compared with saline or no irrigation (56088). However, research comparing povidone-iodine with other antiseptics such as chlorhexidine is conflicting, as are official guidelines for surgical antisepsis. Many of these discrepancies seem to be related to the presence or absence of alcohol in the preparation. A meta-analysis of clinical research comparing aqueous or alcohol-based povidone-iodine shows that using alcohol-based chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis is more effective for preventing postoperative surgical site infections and may be associated with a lower overall positive culture rate. However, since evidence for both aqueous and alcohol-based solutions of povidone-iodine were included in this study, it is unclear if this may have affected outcomes (108710). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guideline recommends chlorhexidine solution as the first choice for preparing the skin for surgery, with povidone-iodine solution as a second-line option. The antiseptic solutions are recommended to be alcohol-based as long as the surgical site is not near a mucous membrane (105906). The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines also recommend alcohol-based chlorhexidine solutions over either alcohol-based or aqueous povidone-iodine for preventing surgical site infections. However, some experts have expressed concern that these recommendations are based on faulty evidence, as some studies used povidone-iodine preparations with lower alcohol amounts than their comparator groups (105898). In fact, the guideline from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) does not differentiate between povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine antiseptic solutions as long as they are alcohol-based (105905).
• Thyroid storm. Oral iodine is recommended as an adjunct to standard treatment for thyroid storm. Details: The American Thyroid Association (ATA) and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) recommend a multimodality approach for treating thyroid storm that includes taking five drops of a saturated solution of potassium iodine every 6 hours (15,92699).
• Thyroid nodules. Combining oral iodine with thyroxine seems to improve the resolution of thyroid nodules. Details: A clinical study in patients with benign nodular thyroid disease and possible iodine deficiency shows that taking iodized salt 200 mcg daily in addition to thyroxine 1.5 mcg/kg daily after surgery seems to reduce the size of the thyroid remnant by 40%, compared with a 10% reduction in patients given thyroxine alone (55927). Also, one large clinical trial in patients with nodular goiter shows that taking potassium iodide 150 mcg daily in combination with levothyroxine 50-100 mcg daily for 12 months reduces nodule volume by about 17%, compared with 7% in the group using levothyroxine alone (91392).
• Venous leg ulcers. Topical cadexomer iodine seems to improve the healing of venous leg ulcers; however, it is unclear if applying povidone-iodine is beneficial. Details: A meta-analysis of four small clinical studies in patients with venous leg ulcers shows that applying cadexomer iodine results in complete healing of ulcers in 33% of patients after 4-12 weeks, compared with only 15% of patients receiving standard care alone. However, use of cadexomer iodine was associated with more adverse effects than standard care. Furthermore, preliminary clinical research shows that applying cadexomer iodine is comparable to hydrocolloid dressing, paraffin gauze dressing, dextranomer, and silver-impregnated dressings for improving the rate of complete healing. A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research show that povidone-iodine has comparable healing rates when compared with amoxicillin, hydrocolloid dressings, and moist or foam dressings (99798). These findings were consistent with an older version of this meta-analysis (56076).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Catheter-related infections. Topical povidone-iodine seems to be less effective than chlorhexidine for preventing infections from intravascular catheters. Furthermore, it does not seem to reduce the risk of catheter-related urinary tract infections. Details: One meta-analysis of clinical research shows that topical application of povidone-iodine reduces the risk of bloodstream infections when applied at the insertion site of hemodialysis central venous catheters (55883). However, disinfecting catheter insertion sites using povidone-iodine seems to be less effective for preventing blood stream infections in patients receiving central venous, pulmonary artery, or peripheral artery catheters when compared with chlorhexidine solutions (55883,55916). In addition, periurethral cleansing with povidone-iodine 10% prior to bladder catheterization, as well as bladder irrigation with povidone-iodine 2% prior to urinary catheter removal, does not seem to reduce the risk of urinary tract infections when compared with placebo (56058,56126).
• Prematurity. Maternal iodine supplementation does not seem to impact neurological development in premature infants. Details: A meta-analysis of two clinical trials in premature infants shows that adding iodine to enteral or parenteral feeds does not improve mental, visual, or auditory development or reduce the risk of death when compared with no iodine supplementation (99797).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Chyluria. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with chyluria. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chyluria suggests that using povidone-iodine 0.2% solution as a sclerosant in renal pelvic instillation sclerotherapy (RPIS) may be as effective as using silver nitrate 1% (55970).
• Corneal ulceration. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with corneal ulceration. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that administering povidone-iodine 2.5% eye drops every two hours for two weeks in addition to standard antibiotic therapy does not reduce visual impairment in patients with corneal ulcers when compared with standard antibiotic therapy alone (55971).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if rinsing with a povidone-iodine mouthwash and using a povidone-iodine nasal spray and ointment can reduce the spread of COVID-19. Details: A small clinical study in adults with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 shows that orally swishing and gargling 25 mL of povidone-iodine (PI) 1% solution, then, into each nostril, spraying 2.5 mL of PI 1% solution and applying one dab of PI 10% ointment, and repeating this 4 times daily for 5 days does not seem to alter the quantity of viral RNA over time when compared with control (105877). The validity of this finding is limited because all study participants achieved negative viral titers on the third day of the study.
• Cutaneous sporotrichosis. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with cutaneous sporotrichosis; research is conflicting. Details: Anecdotal reports and case series suggest that taking saturated solution of potassium iodide (SSKI) orally is effective for most patients when used alone or in combination with another antifungal, including terbinafine or itraconazole (17562,17563,17564,17565,17566,17567,17568,17569,17570,17571) (17572,17573). In one non-controlled clinical study, treatment with SSKI, starting with 3 drops (150 mg potassium iodide) daily and titrating up, resulted in symptom resolution in about 90% of patients after about 33 days of treatment (17561). However, some patients are not able to take SSKI due to intolerable side effects (17561,17572).
• Hyperthyroidism. It is unclear if oral potassium iodide is beneficial for patients with Graves' disease undergoing total thyroidectomy. Details: A retrospective study in patients with Graves' disease undergoing total thyroidectomy shows that preoperative administration of saturated solution of potassium iodide (SSKI) 5% does not reduce the rate of postoperative complications, such as transient or permanent hypoparathyroidism, transient recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy, definitive RLN palsy, and cervical hematoma, when compared with no preoperative administration (108707).
• Infant development. It is unclear if maternal iodine supplementation impacts neurological development in infants. Details: Three-year follow-up data from a clinical study in infants and breastfeeding females shows that maternal supplementation of iodine 150 mcg daily improves child cognitive scores, but does not affect language or motor scores, when compared with placebo. Supplementation with a higher dose of 300 mcg daily yielded similar cognitive, language, and motor scores as the 150 mcg dose (108706). This finding aligns with the daily recommended dietary allowance (RDA) of 290 mcg during lactation, which is sometimes achieved by augmenting the diet with a 150-mcg iodine supplement (7135).
• Postoperative bleeding. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with postoperative bleeding. Details: A small clinical study suggests that irrigating extraction sockets with povidone-iodine 1% stops bleeding in a greater number of patients following tooth extraction when compared with a saline solution (56011).
• Rhinosinusitis. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with rhinosinusitis. Details: A small prospective cohort study in patients with recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis has found that using a povidone-iodine 0.08% nasal rinse every other day for 7 weeks in addition to standard therapy improves symptoms and reduces signs of infection when compared with baseline (103074). However, one small clinical study in patients with a history of sinus surgery and acute exacerbations of chronic sinusitis shows that receiving povidone-iodine nasal irrigations twice daily for 30 days is no different than irrigations with mupirocin or normal saline for improving nasal symptoms. However, mupirocin tended to reduce bacteria count to a greater extent than the povidone-iodine solution (105878). This finding is limited due to small study size and potential lack of power to detect differences between groups.
• Thyroid cancer. It is unclear if dietary iodine is associated with complications in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. Details: A retrospective study in patients in China with papillary thyroid cancer has found that dietary intake of iodine resulting in serum concentrations greater than 90 mcg/L is associated with a 75% increased risk of cervical lymph node metastases when compared with concentrations less than 45 mcg/L (108708). Actual dietary intake of iodine was not reported, limiting the validity of this finding.
• Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). It is unclear if oral iodine rinse is beneficial for the prevention of VAP. Details: A small clinical study in patients with severe head trauma suggests that regularly rinsing the throat with 20 mL of povidone-iodine 10% solution decreases the risk for VAP when compared with using a saline rinse (56003).
• Wound healing. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial for wound healing. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that topical iodine, as cadexomer iodine or povidone-iodine, is superior to non-antiseptic dressings and some antiseptic agents, such as silver sulfadiazine, for reducing wound size. However, iodine seems to be less effective than local antibiotics such as rifamycin (56083). More evidence is needed to rate iodine for these uses.

(Read more about IODINE)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). When used alone or in combination with other ingredients, oral lutein seems to improve some aspects of vision in patient with AMD. However, it does not seem to slow the progression of AMD. Details: Epidemiological research has found that people who consume higher amounts of lutein plus zeaxanthin in the diet have a reduced risk of developing AMD (219,2394,60238,106353). The association between intake of lutein specifically and the development of AMD is not clear; however, dietary lutein levels are much higher than dietary zeaxanthin levels. Although one study found no association between increased dietary lutein consumption and a reduced risk for age-related maculopathy, people in this study already had high lutein intake at baseline (14007). Some research has assessed whether lutein supplements can reduce symptoms and progression of existing AMD. Clinical research, including pooled analyses, in adults with AMD shows that taking supplemental lutein 10-20 mg daily for up to 36 months modestly improves some aspects of vision, such as macular pigment optical density, the ability of the eyes to adapt to varying light conditions (glare recovery), the ability to see details of near objects (near vision acuity), and the ability to see under low-contrast conditions (contrast sensitivity) (11798,48213,60185,60242,60245,60268,60270,60280,90678,91160)(91165,97225,102887,106366). Meta-analyses of these and other studies shows that taking lutein or a related xanthophyll carotenoid (zeaxanthin or meso-zeaxanthin) improves macular optical density when compared with placebo in patients with or without AMD. Treatment duration of at least 3 months, doses greater than 5 mg, and/or combination treatment with all three carotenoids are associated with a greater improvement in macular optical density (97225,106366). However, lutein supplements do not appear to affect the progression of AMD (60281). A meta-analysis of 6 studies shows that taking lutein supplements for 0.5-5 years does not reduce the risk of visual loss or progression to late-stage AMD when compared with placebo (95839). Lutein has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients, with conflicting findings. Although not all research agrees, lutein-containing combination supplements might improve some symptoms of AMD (19196,60134,60180,60207,60237,60244,97226). A specific supplement (AZYR SIFI) containing lutein 10 mg, vitamin C 180 mg, vitamin E 30 mg, zinc 22.5 mg, copper 1 mg, zeaxanthin 1 mg, and astaxanthin 4 mg has been used daily for 1-2 years in some research with moderate evidence of benefit (19196,60244). Taking lutein 10 mg plus zeaxanthin 2 mg in addition to the original Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) formulation (vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc) does not seem to prevent the progression to advanced AMD more than the AREDS formulation alone. However, this progression was modestly inhibited in individuals with low dietary intakes of lutein and zeaxanthin. While progression to late AMD was only modestly inhibited at 5 years when these doses of lutein and zeaxanthin were included in a revised formulation devoid of beta-carotene (AREDS2) (60281), results of an additional 5 years of follow up showed that this revised formulation reduces the risk of progression to late AMD by 15% when compared with the formulation containing beta-carotene (108615). In first-generation offspring of parents with neovascular AMD, taking lutein 10 mg, zeaxanthin 2 mg, vitamin C 180 mg, vitamin E 30 mg, zinc 15 mg, and copper 1 mg daily for 6 months does not improve the macular pigment optical density (106347). Reasons for these discrepancies are not clear but may relate to lutein dose, dietary lutein intake, treatment duration, or the other ingredients included in the combination products.
• Cataracts. Increased dietary lutein seems to reduce the odds of developing cataracts. It is unclear if oral lutein supplementation is beneficial in those who already have cataracts. Details: Observational research and a meta-analysis of this evidence suggests that higher blood levels and/or higher dietary intake of lutein are associated with a 25% lower odds of developing age-related cataracts, and more specifically, a 25% to 27% decreased risk of developing nuclear cataracts (90944,91161,91162,112095). Population research has also found that people who consume higher amounts of lutein (6.9-11.7 mg daily) as part of their diet have a reduced risk of developing severe cataracts that require surgical removal (2395,3219,3220). Clinical research shows that taking lutein 10 mg and zeaxanthin 2 mg per day orally for an average of 4.7 years decreases the risk of needing cataract surgery by 32% in patients with low dietary intake of lutein and zeaxanthin; however, it doesn't benefit patients with higher dietary intake of lutein and zeaxanthin (94703). Some evidence shows that supplemental lutein might benefit patients who already have cataracts. Preliminary clinical research in adults with grade 2 or 3 senile cataracts shows that taking lutein 15 mg orally three times weekly for up to 2 years can improve the ability to see clearly when compared to baseline (60133).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Oral lutein does not seem to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm and low birth weight infants. Details: Clinical research shows that giving preterm and low birth weight infants a specific product (LUTEINofta, SOOFT Italia SpA) containing lutein 0.14 mg and zeaxanthin 0.0006 mg orally once daily, starting at birth and continuing until 36 weeks corrected gestational age, does not decrease the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia when compared with placebo (91163).
• Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Oral lutein does not seem to prevent NEC in preterm and low birth weight infants. Details: Clinical research shows that giving preterm and low birth weight infants a specific product (LUTEINofta, SOOFT Italia SpA) containing lutein 0.14 mg and zeaxanthin 0.0006 mg orally once daily, starting at birth and continuing until 36 weeks corrected gestational age, does not decrease the incidence of NEC when compared with placebo (91163).
• Retinitis pigmentosa. Oral lutein does not seem to improve vision or slow down retinal degeneration in patients with this condition. Details: While some preliminary clinical evidence suggests that oral lutein might be helpful in the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa (10279), most clinical research shows that taking lutein does not improve vision or other markers of retinal degeneration in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (60117,60165,60225).
• Retinopathy of prematurity. Oral lutein does not seem to prevent retinopathy of prematurity in preterm and low birth weight infants. Details: Clinical research in preterm and low birth weight infants shows that giving 0.5 mL or 1.8 mL/kg of a specific product (LUTEINofta, SOOFT Italia SpA) providing lutein 0.14 mg, or giving 0.5 mg/kg plus zeaxanthin 0.0006 mg or 0.02 mg/kg orally once daily, starting at birth and continuing until 36-40 weeks corrected gestational age, does not decrease the incidence or severity of retinopathy of prematurity when compared with placebo (60240,60243,91163,102889).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for attenuating cognitive decline in older adults. Details: Clinical research in adults 40-75 years old shows that taking lutein 10 mg with zeaxanthin 2 mg daily for 6 months improves some, but not all, measures of visual memory when compared with placebo. However, other measures of memory and cognitive function were not improved (109763). Preliminary clinical research in older adults shows that taking the same dose of lutein and zeaxanthin for one year modestly improves some measures of cognitive function, such as complex attention and cognitive flexibility, when compared with placebo (106367). Other preliminary clinical research in older females shows that taking lutein 12 mg alone or with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 800 mg daily for 4 months can improve verbal fluency and memory scores when compared to baseline (48216). Also, some observational research in patients 50 years and older has found that higher dietary lutein and zeaxanthin intake is associated with greater word recall when compared with lower intake (102891). However, clinical research in patients over 60 years old shows that taking lutein 10 mg with zeaxanthin 2 mg daily for 5 years in addition to vitamins C and E, beta-carotene, and zinc (AREDS) does not improve markers of cognitive function, such as memory and verbal fluency, when compared with AREDS alone (94702). More research is needed to determine whether lutein is beneficial for specific measures of cognitive function in older adults.
• Alzheimer disease. Oral lutein has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease shows that taking lutein 10 mg, zeaxanthin 2 mg, meso-zeaxanthin 10 mg, fish oil 1 gram (providing docosahexaenoic acid 500 mg and eicosapentaenoic acid 150 mg), and vitamin E 15 mg (Memory Health) daily for 12 months does not affect disease severity when compared with placebo. However, there were modest increases the number of patients experiencing either an improvement or an attenuated decline in memory and mood (109764). The effect of lutein alone is unclear.
• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for ALS prevention. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of lutein is associated with a 21% lower risk of developing ALS when compared with lower dietary intake (90412). It is unknown if supplemental lutein has any effect on the risk of developing ALS.
• Asthenopia (eye strain). It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for eye strain. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that some combination lutein supplements might reduce symptoms of eye strain. Results from one clinical trial show that taking a combination product containing lutein, zeaxanthin, and black currant extract daily for 2 weeks improves visual fatigue and eye stress when compared with placebo in patients completing a two-hour visual proof reading task (60214). Other clinical research shows that taking lutein 17.5 mg plus omega-3 fatty acids (standardized to contain docosahexaenoic acid 783 mg and eicosapentaenoic acid 162 mg) and bilberry extract (standardized to contain anthocyanidin 59 mg) daily for 4 weeks reduces symptoms of eye strain when compared with placebo (35470). The effect of lutein alone on eye strain is unclear.
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for asthma prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher dietary intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin is associated with up to 30% lower odds of having asthma when compared with a lower dietary intake (109765). The effects of lutein intake alone or lutein supplementation are unclear.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Eating more lutein in the diet seems to reduce the risk of CVD. However, taking oral lutein supplements does not seem to prevent CVD events or mortality. Details: One observational study has found that increased intake of dietary lutein is marginally associated with a reduced risk of developing coronary heart disease (14108). A meta-analysis including this and other studies shows that high dietary lutein intake or high lutein serum concentrations are associated with a 12% reduction in the incidence of coronary heart disease, an 18% reduction in stroke, and a 25% reduction in the incidence of metabolic syndrome when compared with low lutein intake or serum concentrations (97227). However, clinical research shows that taking lutein 10 mg plus zeaxanthin 2 mg daily for an average of 4.8 years does not decrease the risk of CVD-related mortality or cardiovascular events such as stroke, myocardial infarction, or angina when compared with no supplementation in patients 50-85 years old (94701). Unlike the analysis above, individual cardiovascular outcomes were not separately evaluated in this study. The effect of lutein on CVD in younger patients or in doses greater than 10 mg is unknown.
• Central serous retinopathy. Oral lutein has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a supplement containing lutein 15 mg, vitamin C 288 mg, vitamin E 150 IU, zinc 9 mg, and copper 1.2 mg (Sante Lutax 15, Santen Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd) three times daily after meals for 6 months has no effect on mean best-corrected visual acuity, serous retinal detachment, or subfoveal fluid remission when compared with placebo in patients with central serous retinopathy (97224).
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for cervical cancer prevention. Details: Epidemiological research has found that low dietary intake of lutein is not associated with an increased risk for developing cervical cancer (60297).
• Child development. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for child development. Details: Epidemiological research has found that a higher dietary intake of lutein in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy is associated with increased verbal intelligence and improved behavior in the child at 6-10 years of age. However, the ability to discriminate between a novel or familiar visual stimulus was reduced at about 6 months of age, and there were no effects on most cognitive outcomes in children aged 3-6 years (107106). Other epidemiological research has found that a higher dietary intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin in children aged 3-6 years may be associated with modestly improved executive function at 6-10 years. However, there were no effects on most cognitive outcomes in children aged 3-6 years or 6-10 years (109761).
• Choroideremia. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for improving vision. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking lutein 20 mg daily for 6 months does not improve vision in patients with choroideremia (60124).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for improving cognitive function. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that increased dietary lutein does not improve cognitive function measures, such as attention, executive function, or memory, when compared with placebo or an isocaloric meal (107082). However, the dietary source of lutein used in the included studies was heterogeneous and any conclusions remain unclear. Doses of lutein ranged from 8-12 mg daily, alone or in combination with daily zeaxanthin 2-26 mg and/or meso-zeaxanthin 10 mg and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 800 mg (107082). However, some preliminary clinical research in younger adults shows that taking lutein 10 mg and zeaxanthin 2 mg for one year modestly improves some measures of cognitive function, such as spatial memory, when compared with placebo (106348). Also, observational research has found that intake of choline and lutein plus zeaxanthin is positively associated with cognitive flexibility task performance speed. However, this association is not present with the intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin in the absence of choline (106354). Reasons for these discrepancies are not clear but may relate to lutein dose, treatment duration, or the addition of other nutrients to the diet or supplements.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for colorectal cancer prevention. Details: Some epidemiological research has found that higher dietary intake of lutein is associated with a reduced risk of developing colon cancer (3962). However, most epidemiological research has found that higher dietary intake of lutein is not associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer (34481,106372). It is not known if supplemental lutein has any effect on colorectal cancer risk.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for depression. Details: A cross-sectional study in 8655 adults with cardiometabolic disease including diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, heart failure, and stroke suggests that higher dietary lutein and zeaxanthin intake is associated with a 31% reduced risk of depression when compared with lower dietary intake. The study also found that adults with depression had lower dietary lutein and zeaxanthin intake than those without depression. Additionally, the study found a nonlinear U-shaped relationship between total dietary carotenoid intake and the risk of depression among patients with cardiometabolic disease, where the risk of depression decreased with increasing total dietary carotenoid intake up until an inflection point where the risk of depression increased with increasing total dietary carotenoid intake (112098). Further research is needed to establish causality.
• Diabetes. Observational research suggests that oral lutein may not be beneficial for the prevention of diabetes or diabetic complications. Details: Some epidemiological research has found that low serum levels of carotenoids, including lutein, are associated with impaired glucose tolerance. This may indicate that taking carotenoids such as lutein might reduce the risk of diabetes development (60161). However, population research has found that increasing intake of dietary lutein plus zeaxanthin does not decrease the risk of developing type 2 diabetes (14004,97227). Other epidemiological research in patients with type 2 diabetes has found that an increased serum concentration of lutein is not associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality over 14 years (109768).
• Diabetic retinopathy. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial in diabetic retinopathy. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking lutein 10 mg daily for 36 weeks has no effect on visual acuity or glare sensitivity in patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (97223). Observational research in a small group of patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy has also found that taking lutein 4 mg with zeaxanthin 0.5 mg daily for 4 months does not improve visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, or glare sensitivity when compared with zeaxanthin alone (100986).
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for esophageal cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that people who consume higher amounts of lutein and zeaxanthin in their diet have a 29% lower risk of developing esophageal squamous cell cancer when compared with those with lower intake (91159). It is unknown if supplemental lutein has any effect on esophageal cancer risk.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial in relieving muscle soreness due to exercise. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking a specific lutein-containing combination product (BioAstin, Cyanotech Corp.) containing haematococcus algae extract with astaxanthin 4 mg and lutein 480 mg daily for 3 weeks prior to exercise does not significantly reduce post-exercise muscle soreness when compared with placebo (19199). The effect of lutein alone is unclear.
• Fractures. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for fracture prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that increased dietary intake of lutein and/or zeaxanthin is not associated with a reduced risk of hip fractures (97228).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for gastric cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that increased dietary intake of lutein and/or zeaxanthin is not associated with a reduced risk of developing gastric cancer (97231).
• Glaucoma. Oral lutein has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with open-angle glaucoma shows that taking oral lutein 10 mg, zeaxanthin 2 mg, and meso-zeaxanthin 10 mg daily for 18 months increases macular pigment density, but does not affect visual function, when compared with placebo (109756).
• Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for hyperlipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that supplementation with lutein does not reduce the levels of total, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol when compared with placebo (109757). Most publications included in this analysis evaluated lutein alone in healthy adults or in patients with age-related macular degeneration, two studies combined lutein with another ingredient, and one study evaluated zeaxanthin alone. The effect of lutein in patients with existing hyperlipidemia is unclear.
• Infertility. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for infertility. Details: An observational study suggests that there is no association between dietary lutein intake and in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes including good oocyte quality, embryo transfer success rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and successful term pregnancy rates in subfertile couples who are candidates for IVF (112097).
• Lung cancer. Research is conflicting whether oral lutein is beneficial for lung cancer prevention. Details: Epidemiological research has found that low serum levels of carotenoids, including lutein, are associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (12874). However, other epidemiological research has found that higher serum levels or higher dietary intake of lutein are not associated with a reduced risk of developing or dying from lung cancer (39690,60090,60160). Another large epidemiological cancer screening trial with a mean follow-up of over 12 years suggests that dietary intake of lutein and zeaxanthin is protective against lung cancer as shown by a non-linear dose response curve, where lower doses of lutein and zeaxanthin are associated with a sharp decrease in the incidence of lung cancer, followed by a more gradual decrease in incidence at higher doses (112096).
• Macular telangiectasia type 2. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for macular telangiectasia type 2. Details: In patients with macular telangiectasia type 2, observational research has found that taking a specific combination of lutein 10 mg, meso-zeaxanthin 10 mg, and zeaxanthin 2 mg (MacuShield; Alliance Pharmaceuticals) for at least 6 months, with an average duration of 15.7 months, was associated with a stabilization of visual acuity. Also, the number and size of cavitations in the macula were reduced (106355).
• Metabolic syndrome. Oral lutein has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research shows that high dietary lutein intake or high lutein serum concentrations are associated with a 25% reduction in the incidence of metabolic syndrome when compared with low lutein intake or serum concentrations (97227). Additional population research in females shows that the highest dietary intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin is associated with 54% reduced odds of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with the lowest intake. However, when supplements containing lutein plus zeaxanthin were included in the total intake, there was no association with metabolic syndrome (109760).
• Myopia. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for myopia. Details: A very small clinical study in adults aged 20-50 years with high myopia shows that taking lutein 20 mg daily for 6 months does not improve macular pigment optical density, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, or electroretinogram measurements when compared with placebo (112099). The validity of these findings is limited by the very small sample size and short study duration.
• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for Non-Hodgkin lymphoma prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational population research has found that increased intake of lutein/zeaxanthin in the diet is associated with an 18% lower risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma when compared with low dietary intake. However, no dose-response relationship was reported (97229). It is unknown if supplemental lutein has any effect on non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for obesity. Details: A small clinical trial in obese middle-aged individuals shows that taking lutein 20 mg daily in addition to following a low-calorie diet for 10 weeks does not affect most anthropometric or cardiometabolic indices when compared with a low-calorie diet alone. However, there was a small beneficial effect on body fat and total cholesterol levels (107107).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for pancreatic cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that increased dietary intake of lutein and/or zeaxanthin is not associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer (97230). The effects of supplemental lutein are unclear.
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for Parkinson disease prevention. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of lutein is not associated with the risk of developing Parkinson disease (91164). The effects of supplemental lutein are unclear.
• Pre-eclampsia. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for pre-eclampsia prevention. Details: Some epidemiological research has found that high plasma concentrations of lutein are associated with a decreased risk of pre-eclampsia (60142). Other epidemiological research has found that the highest dietary intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin during pregnancy is associated with 68% reduced odds of having pre-eclampsia when compared with the lowest intake (109762). The effects of lutein supplements are unclear.
• Respiratory tract infections. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial in respiratory tract infection prevention or treatment. Details: Epidemiological research has found that high serum levels of lutein are not associated with a decreased incidence or severity of respiratory tract infections in the elderly (60152). The effects of supplemental lutein are unclear.
• Ulcerative colitis. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for ulcerative colitis. Details: In patients in the remission phase of ulcerative colitis, observational research has found that a higher dietary intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin is associated with a reduced incidence of constipation, but not flatulence or feelings of urgency (tenesmus) (106362). The effects of supplemental lutein are unclear.
• Visual development. It is unclear if taking oral lutein during pregnancy can improve the visual acuity of the child. Details: Some observational research has found that higher maternal lutein levels are associated with a 22% to 40% lower risk of poor visual acuity in children at 3 years of age when compared with lower maternal lutein levels (102888). However, other epidemiological research has found that dietary intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin during the first or third trimesters of pregnancy is not associated with contrast vision or visual acuity in the child at 11-12 years of age (109759). The effects of lutein supplements are unclear. More evidence is needed to rate lutein for these uses.

(Read more about LUTEIN)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Prostate cancer. Early findings suggests that oral lycopene might have a small benefit in preventing the development or recurrence of prostate cancer. Details: While some observational studies have found a reduced risk for prostate cancer from increased dietary lycopene intake (2405,2406,7772,7773,7895,12878,60304,60448,109432), others have found no significant association (34635,60334,60449,60457,60547). The most recent meta-analysis of these and other observational studies has found an overall modest benefit, suggesting that the risk of developing prostate cancer decreases by 1% for each additional 2 mg of daily dietary lycopene intake, and decreases by 3.5% for each 10 mcg/dL increase in plasma lycopene levels (98824). A subgroup analysis of some population research also suggests that the benefits from increased dietary lycopene may be limited to non-Hispanic White subjects (109432). Furthermore, a small clinical study in patients at high risk for developing prostate cancer with high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia shows that taking lycopene (Lyc-O-Mato, LycoRed Natural Product Industries) 4 mg twice daily for one year might delay progression to prostate cancer when compared with no supplementation (14126). Numerous small heterogeneous studies have examined the effect of lycopene on serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels. One meta-analysis of 6 controlled clinical trials in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia shows that taking lycopene 15-45 mg daily for 4 months does not reduce PSA levels when compared with control. However, in patients with a higher baseline PSA of over 6.5 mg/L, lycopene supplementation seems to reduce PSA levels when compared with control (105573). Other small, uncontrolled studies in patients in remission or with recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer suggest that taking lycopene (LycoRed, Jagsonpal Pharmaceuticals; Lyc-O-Mato, LycoRed Natural Product Industries Ltd.) 10-30 mg daily, or tomato products providing a mean of 43 mg lycopene daily, for 3-6 months reduces PSA levels when compared to baseline (60353,60397,60403,60417). Lycopene might also be beneficial in patients receiving surgical interventions. Small clinical studies in patients receiving orchiectomy for metastatic prostate cancer or radical prostatectomy show that taking lycopene 4 mg daily for 6 months or 30 mg daily for 3 weeks seems to reduce and normalize PSA levels when compared with baseline or control (7771,60328,60342). However, not all research has been positive. Two small clinical studies in patients with relapsed or androgen-independent prostate cancer show that taking lycopene 15-120 mg daily for up to one year does not affect PSA levels when compared with baseline (60372,60384). Many of these findings are limited due to a lack of a placebo control.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Bladder cancer. Dietary lycopene does not seem to affect the risk of bladder cancer. Details: Epidemiological research and population studies have not established a link between dietary intake of lycopene or lycopene serum levels and the risk of bladder cancer (2407,60411,60496,60533).
• Diabetes. Increased dietary lycopene intake does not seem to reduce the risk of diabetes or diabetic complications. Details: Population research has found that increasing intake of dietary lycopene does not decrease the risk of developing type 2 diabetes (14004,14361). Other epidemiological research in patients with type 2 diabetes has found that an increased serum concentration of lycopene is not associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality over 14 years (109768).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). It is unclear if oral lycopene is beneficial in patients with AMD; the available evidence is conflicting. Details: Some observational research has found that lycopene serum levels in the lowest quintile are associated with an almost two-fold increased risk for AMD when compared with levels in the highest quintile (6110). However, other population research has found no association between lycopene serum levels or dietary lycopene intake and the risk of developing AMD (5922,10902,14007,60585).
• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). It is unclear if dietary lycopene helps to prevent ALS. Details: Population research has found that the highest quintile of total dietary carotenoid intake is associated with a 25% lower risk of ALS when compared with the lowest quintile. However, no association was found for lycopene intake alone (90412).
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral lycopene reduces asthma exacerbations or prevents asthma. Details: Some preliminary clinical research in adults with stable asthma shows that taking a specific tomato extract product (Lyc-O-Mato, LycoRed Natural Products Industries, Ltd.) providing lycopene 15 mg three times daily orally for up to 14 weeks does not reduce asthma exacerbations when compared with placebo (60482). However, other observational research has found that a higher dietary intake of lycopene is associated with at least a 20% lower odds of having asthma when compared with a lower dietary intake (109765). The effects of lycopene supplements are unclear.
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral lycopene is beneficial in patients with atherosclerosis. Details: Some observational research has found that higher serum lycopene levels are associated with a lesser degree of aortic or carotid atherosclerosis (1446,60329,60463). Some observational research has also found that higher serum lycopene levels are associated with a lower risk of coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction in people with atherosclerosis (7897,60538). However, there does not seem to be a link between serum lycopene levels and the risk of ischemic stroke (1449).
• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Small studies suggest that lycopene products might improve BPH symptoms. Details: While epidemiological evidence has not found an association between dietary lycopene and the development of BPH (60365), clinical research suggests that lycopene might improve BPH-related symptoms. One small clinical study in patients with BPH shows that taking lycopene (LycoVit powder, BASF) 15 mg daily for 6 months slows the progression of BPH and improves symptom scores when compared to baseline (60399). This finding is limited by the lack a statistical comparison to the control group. Research also suggests that combination products containing lycopene might improve BPH symptoms. These products have combined lycopene 2.1 mg with pumpkin seed oil 160 mg, small-flowered willow herb 500 mg, pygeum 15 grams, and saw palmetto 660 mg (ProstateEZE Max, Caruso's Natural Health) once daily for 3 months (92164); and lycopene 5 mg with saw palmetto 320 mg and selenium 50 mcg (Profluss, KonPharma) daily for 1 year (90354).
• Brain tumor. It is unclear if oral lycopene is beneficial for various types of brain tumor. Details: A small clinical study in patients with glioblastoma multiforme or anaplastic astrocytoma shows that taking lycopene 8 mg orally daily for 3 months does not improve the response to radiotherapy and paclitaxel when compared with placebo (60441).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral lycopene reduces the risk of breast cancer. Details: Some observational research has found that higher levels of lycopene in the blood and breast adipose tissue are associated with reduced breast cancer risk (10132,34634,60549,60555). However, other epidemiological research has found that neither dietary lycopene intake nor lycopene serum levels are associated with breast cancer risk (10823,15751,60344,60468,60541). Also, some population research has found that there is a possible relationship between low serum lycopene levels and an increased risk of breast cancer in Black females, but not White females (60325).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if oral lycopene reduces the risk of CVD. Details: Most epidemiological research has found that higher serum levels of lycopene and increased dietary lycopene intake are associated with modestly reduced risk of adverse cardiovascular events, including reduced incidence of coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, and mortality (7897,9594,10418,15749,60538,102178,109434). However, evidence from clinical trials shows that lycopene may not improve most risk factors for CVD. Meta-analyses of clinical research in healthy adults or patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor show that taking lycopene 1.44 to 75 mg daily does not improve blood pressure, lipid levels, or endothelial function when compared with control (95777,105575). These findings are limited by the heterogeneity of the included trials.
• Cataracts. It is unclear if oral lycopene is beneficial for reducing the risk of cataracts. Details: One epidemiological study has found that serum lycopene levels are inversely associated with the risk of developing cataracts (60203). However, other population studies have found no association between lycopene serum levels or dietary intake of lycopene and the development of cataracts (3219,3220,60299).
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral lycopene reduces the risk of cervical cancer. Details: Epidemiological research has found that higher serum lycopene levels or higher dietary lycopene intake is associated with a reduced risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer (60429,60430,60439,60566). However, other studies have not shown this association (60388,60517,60521).
• Chronic prostatitis and chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). Oral lycopene has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with prostatitis and chronic pelvic pain syndrome shows that taking a specific combination of lycopene 5 mg with selenium 50 mcg and saw palmetto 320 mg (Profluss, KonPharma) daily for 8 weeks reduces pain scores by 52%, compared with a 26% reduction with saw palmetto alone (60442). It is unclear if this effect is due to lycopene, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral lycopene is beneficial for improving cognitive function and memory. Details: Observational research in healthy adults has found that consuming more lycopene in the diet over 22 years is associated with lower odds of poor cognitive function (104468).
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if lycopene reduces the risk for colorectal cancer; the available research is conflicting. Details: Some population research has found that the highest tertile of dietary lycopene intake is associated with a 50% reduced risk for colorectal cancer when compared with the lowest tertile (2407,38845). However, other epidemiological research has found no association between dietary lycopene intake and the risk of colorectal cancer, regardless of smoking status, drinking status, geographical location, gender, and tumor location (3962,34542,95778).
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if oral lycopene is beneficial for preventing esophageal cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that high dietary intake of lycopene is associated with a 25% reduced odds of developing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma when compared with low dietary intake of lycopene (91159).
• Exercise-induced asthma. It is unclear if oral lycopene is beneficial for preventing exacerbations of exercise-induced asthma. Details: One very small clinical trial in children and adults with exercise-induced asthma shows that taking a specific tomato extract product (Lyc-O-Mato, LycoRed Natural Products Industries, Ltd.) providing lycopene 30 mg daily for 1 week seems to reduce the incidence of exercise-induced asthma exacerbations, but does not improve certain measures of lung function, when compared to baseline (7898). However, another very small study in adolescent athletes with exercise-induced asthma shows that taking the same product and dose for 1 week does not improve post-exercise lung function or reduce exacerbations when compared with placebo (60358). This study may have been underpowered to detect a difference between groups.
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. Oral lycopene has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adult long-distance runners shows that taking a combination product (Lycored Ltd.) containing lycopene 5 mg, other carotenoids 4 mg, folic acid 0.1 mg, tocopherols 4 mg, and rosemary extract orally once daily for 4 weeks reduces muscle damage associated with a 2-hour run when compared with placebo (98825).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral lycopene reduces the risk of gastric cancer. Details: Preliminary observational research in adult males has found that high dietary intake of lycopene is associated with 0.87 lower odds of having stomach cancer when compared with low dietary intake (109436).
• Gingivitis. Small studies suggest that ingesting or injecting oral lycopene products might improve gingivitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific oral lycopene supplement (LycoRed, Jagsonpal Pharmaceuticals) 8 mg daily for 2 weeks, or receiving a single injection of lycopene gel 2 mg into the gums, reduces gingivitis when compared with placebo (60400,60473). However, using a combination product (Lycotas, Intas Pharmaceuticals) containing lycopene 2 mg, vitamin C 50 mg, vitamin A 2500 units, zinc sulfate 20.6 mg, and chromium picolinate 75 mcg orally twice daily for 2 weeks does not improve moderate gingivitis or mild to moderate periodontitis when compared with placebo in people who have also undergone scaling and root planning (92172).
• Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if oral lycopene helps to eradicate H. pylori. Details: A small clinical study in patients diagnosed with H. pylori shows that adding lycopene 30 mg daily for 1 month to standard therapy with metronidazole, amoxicillin, omeprazole, and bismuth does not increase the rate of H. pylori elimination when compared with standard therapy alone (60480).
• Human papillomavirus (HPV). It is unclear if oral lycopene is beneficial in patients with HPV. Details: Epidemiological research in females has found that higher plasma levels of lycopene are associated with a faster rate of oncogenic HPV clearance, with an average of 8.5 months, when compared with lower levels of plasma lycopene, with an average of 11-12 months (12177).
• Hyperlipidemia. Most research shows that oral lycopene doesn't reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels; however, effects on other lipid levels are unclear. Details: A subgroup meta-analysis of 3 small clinical studies in adults with hyperlipidemia shows that taking lycopene 7-15 mg daily or tomato juice containing lycopene 2.5 mg 4 times weekly for 8 weeks does not improve LDL cholesterol levels when compared with control (105575). Another subgroup meta-analysis of 9 studies in adults without hyperlipidemia shows that consuming lycopene, in supplements or in tomato products, also does not seem to reduce LDL cholesterol levels when compared with both active and inactive controls (105575). This finding is limited by the heterogeneity of interventions and patient populations. In contrast, one small clinical study in Japanese patients with borderline high cholesterol shows that taking 50 grams of a semi-dried tomato containing lycopene 22-27.8 mg daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces LDL cholesterol levels, but does not affect high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, when compared with taking 50 grams of tomato without lycopene (102180). Subgroup meta-analyses also show that taking lycopene does not reduce triglyceride levels or improve HDL cholesterol levels (105575). However, a meta-analysis of 14 small clinical trials including healthy subjects and subjects with metabolic disorders shows that taking lycopene 6-75 mg orally daily for 1 week to 6 months moderately improves both HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels when compared with control. A subgroup analysis suggests lycopene may improve lipid levels in unhealthy, but not healthy, subjects. However, the validity of this study is limited by high heterogeneity and the exclusion of LDL cholesterol levels from the analysis (109431). Also, a clinical study in patents with ischemic heart failure shows that taking lycopene 25 mg daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces levels of triglycerides (109773). In postmenopausal females, taking a specific lycopene supplement (LycoRed, Jagsonpal Pharmaceuticals) 4 mg orally twice daily for 6 months also modestly increases triglyceride levels (109694). However, there was no effect on other lipid levels in either of these studies (109694,109773).
• Hypertension. Small clinical studies suggest that some lycopene products might reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension. However, lycopene does not seem to reduce the risk for hypertension. Details: Observational research has found no link between serum lycopene levels and the risk for hypertension (60419). Additionally, lycopene supplements do not seem to reduce blood pressure in patients without hypertension or with pre-hypertension (42079,105572,105575). However, some clinical research suggests that lycopene may be beneficial for lowering blood pressure in people with hypertension. A network meta-analysis of 4 small clinical trials in patients with hypertension shows that taking standardized tomato extract containing lycopene 10-30 mg daily for 4-12 weeks reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by about 8 mmHg and 4 mmHg, respectively, when compared with placebo. This benefit was not seen with supplements containing only lycopene or tomato products without standardized lycopene content (105572). Specific tomato extract products (Lyc-O-Mato or Tomato Nutrient Complex, LycoRed, Ltd.), were used in some studies (60415,102182).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral lycopene is beneficial in patients with lung cancer. Details: Some epidemiological research has found that higher dietary lycopene intake or serum levels are linked to a decreased risk of lung cancer (2595,60332,60363,60550). However, other epidemiological research has found no association between dietary intake or blood levels of lycopene and lung cancer risk (60316,60520,60522,60554).
• Male infertility. It is unclear if oral lycopene is beneficial in male patients with infertility. Details: A small clinical study in males with idiopathic infertility shows that taking lycopene 2 mg orally twice daily for 3 months improves sperm concentration, motility, and morphology when compared with baseline (60340). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Melasma. Topical lycopene has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with melasma shows that applying a sunscreen cream containing lycopene 0.05% and wheat bran extract 3.45% twice daily for 12 weeks seems to modestly reduce the severity of melasma, but not the area of affected skin, when compared with a placebo cream (105569).
• Menopausal symptoms. Oral lycopene has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with menopausal symptoms shows that taking a specific oral combination of lycopene with calcium, vitamin D3, astaxanthin, and citrus bioflavonoids (Cor.Con. International) daily for 8 weeks reduces hot flashes, incontinence, joint pain, anxiety, and depression when compared with no treatment (19198). It is not clear if this effect is due to lycopene, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Obesity. It is unclear if a diet high in lycopene helps to reduce weight. Details: A small clinical study in obese adults shows that ingesting a drink with a carrot paste containing lycopene 7.6-8.6 mg, along with either high-lutein kale paste or low-lutein cabbage paste, daily for 8 weeks does not reduce body weight or waist circumference, but seems to modestly reduce the amount of visceral fat, when compared with baseline (105574). This finding is limited due to a lack of comparison to the control group, which consumed a carrot paste containing no lycopene.
• Oral leukoplakia. It is unclear if oral lycopene is beneficial in patients with oral leukoplakia. Details: A small clinical study in patients with oral leukoplakia shows that taking a specific lycopene supplement (LycoRed, Jagsonpal Pharmaceuticals) 2-4 mg orally twice daily for 3 months improves clinical and histological symptoms in a dose-dependent manner when compared with placebo (15748). Preliminary clinical research also shows that taking lycopene 6 mg, along with vitamin E 400 IU and selenium 200 mcg twice daily, for 3 months has a large beneficial effect on lesion size when compared with placebo (109772).
• Oral submucous fibrosis. Small studies suggest that oral lycopene might slightly improve mouth opening in patients with oral submucous fibrosis. It is unclear if lycopene reduces pain or burning sensation. Details: A meta-analysis of 5 small clinical studies in patients with oral submucous fibrosis, usually from chewing betel nuts and/or tobacco, shows that taking lycopene 4-8 mg twice daily for 1-3 months seems to improve maximal mouth opening, but not pain, when compared with control (105570). Clinical studies reported an average mouth opening increase of 3.5-4 mm when compared to baseline (60381,98823,102181). It is unclear if this improvement is clinically significant. Furthermore, although two clinical studies using specific tomato extracts (LycoRed, Jagsonpal Pharmaceuticals; MintovitL by Obsurge Biotech Limited) show that lycopene also reduces the burning sensation in the mouth (98823,102181), the meta-analysis did not confirm this benefit (105570). All of the available studies have been conducted in India and Saudi Arabia; it is unclear if these results are generalizable to other locations.
• Osteoporosis. It is unclear if oral lycopene reduces the risk of osteoporosis. Details: Population research in adults at least 50 years of age has found that high dietary intake of lycopene is not associated with bone mineral density or osteoporosis risk when compared with low dietary intake (107289).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral lycopene reduces the risk of ovarian cancer. Details: Some epidemiological evidence has found that a diet rich in carotenoids, including lycopene, is associated with a decreased risk of premenopausal ovarian cancer (10133). However, other epidemiological research has found no association (60373,60534).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if oral lycopene reduces the risk of overall mortality. Details: Preliminary observational research in adults undergoing cancer screening has found that moderate dietary intake of lycopene, defined as 5.61-8.43 mg daily, is associated with a lower risk of overall mortality and cardiovascular disease-related mortality when compared with low dietary intake of lycopene, defined as less than 2.79 mg daily. However, higher dietary intake of lycopene of 8.44 mg or greater was not associated with mortality risk (109434).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral lycopene helps to prevent pancreatic cancer. Details: Epidemiological research has found that high dietary intake of lycopene is associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer. Intake in the highest quartile was associated with a 31% reduction in risk when compared with the lowest quartile (15750).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral lycopene helps to prevent Parkinson disease. Details: Epidemiological research has found that neither dietary intake nor blood levels of lycopene is associated with the risk of developing Parkinson disease (91164).
• Polymorphous light eruption (PMLE). Oral lycopene has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with PMLE shows that taking a combination of lycopene 2.5 mg, beta-carotene 4.7 mg, and Lactobacillus johnsonii 500 million CFU (Inneov Sun Sensitivity, Laboratoires Innéov) daily for 12 weeks reduces skin lesion severity after a single exposure to light when compared with placebo (90276). It is not clear if this effect is due to lycopene, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Pre-eclampsia. It is unclear if oral lycopene is beneficial in patients with pre-eclampsia. Details: Epidemiological research has found that the highest intake of lycopene during pregnancy is associated with 45% reduced odds of having pre-eclampsia when compared with the lowest intake (109762). However, results from clinical research are mixed. One clinical study in healthy primigravidae shows that taking a specific oral lycopene supplement (LycoRed, Jagsonpal Pharmaceuticals) 2 mg twice daily, starting between weeks' 16 and 20 of pregnancy and continuing until delivery, lowers mean diastolic blood pressure and reduces the incidence of pre-eclampsia, intra-uterine growth retardation, and preterm labor when compared with placebo (60337). However, another clinical study in this same population shows that taking this same lycopene supplement only once daily, starting between weeks' 12 and 20 of pregnancy, does not reduce the incidence of pre-eclampsia when compared with placebo. Furthermore, the rates of preterm labor and low birth weight were higher in those taking lycopene when compared with placebo (60428). The reasons for these conflicting findings are unclear; larger, high-quality studies are needed to clarify these findings.
• Renal cell carcinoma. It is unclear if oral lycopene reduces the risk for renal cell carcinoma. Details: Observational research has found no association between dietary lycopene intake and the risk of developing renal cell carcinoma (60379).
• Sunburn. Small studies suggest that consuming tomato paste with oral lycopene might prevent sunburn. Details: Small clinical studies in healthy volunteers shows that taking lycopene 10-16 mg daily for 12 weeks, in the form of tomato paste or a tomato extract (Lyc-O-Mato), may provide some protection against experimentally-induced sunburn when compared to baseline or control (23012,60324,60452). More evidence is needed to rate lycopene for these uses.

(Read more about LYCOPENE)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Herpes labialis (cold sores). Most clinical research shows that oral lysine can prevent and treat herpes labialis. The benefits of topical lysine are unclear. Details: Despite one small clinical study that found no benefit (1116), most clinical research shows that taking oral lysine monohydrochloride 1000-1248 mg daily or 1000 mg three times daily reduces the recurrence of herpes labialis infections when compared with placebo (1114,1115,1118,1120,19390,19391). Also, small clinical studies show that taking oral lysine 1000 mg daily in up to two divided doses for up to 12 months or 1000 mg three times daily for 6 months reduces the severity and healing time of herpes labialis infections when compared with placebo (1119,1120). Topical lysine has also been studied in combination with other ingredients. A small, open-label study shows that applying a specific combination product containing lysine and zinc oxide plus 14 other ingredients (Super Lysine Plus +) topically every 2 hours for 11 days seems to decrease symptoms and duration of herpes lesions when compared with baseline (11051). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Also, it is unclear if any benefit is due to lysine, other ingredients, or the combination.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Athletic performance. Although there is interest in using oral lysine for improving athletic performance, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lysine for this purpose.
• Canker sores. It is unclear if oral lysine is beneficial in patients with canker sores. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking oral lysine 500 mg daily may be beneficial for preventing canker sores, and taking oral lysine 4000 mg daily may be beneficial for decreasing the duration of canker sores (19390).
• Child growth. Oral lysine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 4-9 years old with idiopathic short stature shows that taking a combination oral solution containing lysine, inositol, and vitamin B12 10 mL twice daily along with moderate stretching exercises for 12 months increases height, growth velocity, and serum growth indicators and reduces height standard deviation scores when compared with control. However, the combination product does not impact body mass index or the ratio of bone age to chronological age when compared with control (112280). It is unclear if these findings are due to lysine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral lysine is beneficial in patients with diabetes. Details: One small clinical study shows that taking lysine hydrochloride 500 mg twice daily for 2 months does not affect fasting or postprandial blood glucose levels or glycated hemoglobin in patients with type 2 diabetes when compared a calcium phosphate control (19395).
• Diabetic foot ulcers. It is unclear if topical lysine is beneficial in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Details: A small clinical study in adults with type 2 diabetes and grade 2 diabetic foot ulcers shows that applying topical lysine 15% cream twice daily with standard treatment for 8 weeks improves the rate of wound healing and skin color surrounding the wound, and also reduces ulcer size, depth, margins, undermining, edema, induration, granulation tissue, necrotic tissue amount and type, exudate type and amount, and epithelialization when compared with control (112279). The validity of the findings is limited by a lack of blinding and small sample size.
• Hypertension. Limited clinical research shows that oral lysine can reduce blood pressure in hypertensive patients who have deficient dietary lysine intake. Details: Preliminary clinical research in malnourished people in West Africa with deficient lysine intake shows that taking lysine orally 500 mg twice daily for 16 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure (SBP) when compared with placebo in those with hypertension at baseline. The mean SBP was reduced by 17 mmHg in males and 12 mmHg in females. Lysine supplementation did not affect SBP in people who were normotensive at baseline (104104).
• Hypertriglyceridemia. It is unclear if oral lysine is beneficial for patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking lysine 1 gram daily for 12 weeks, with or without vitamin B6 50 mg daily, does not affect body weight, triglyceride levels, or blood glucose levels when compared with placebo in males with hypertriglyceridemia. Furthermore, this dose of lysine, taken alone or in combination with vitamin B6, appears to slightly decrease high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels after 12 weeks when compared with placebo (90642).
• Muscle strength. Higher dietary intake of lysine seems to improve muscle strength in young under- or well-nourished males. Details: Preliminary clinical research in young, under- or well-nourished males shows that consuming lysine 80 mg/kg daily in the diet for 8 weeks improves muscle strength of the forearm by approximately 7.5% when compared with a diet containing lysine 25-40 mg/kg daily (90643).
• Pressure ulcers. A small study suggests that topical lysine may be beneficial for pressure ulcers. Details: A small clinical study in hospitalized adults shows that applying a specific cream containing lysine hyaluronate (Lys-HA, Lysial, Fatai-Nyl Srl; Jasper LLC) topically with dressing changes once daily for one week, then once every 2 days for one week, reduces pressure ulcer size when compared with a cream containing sodium hyaluronate. The effect appears to be greater in patients with more advanced (stage 3) ulcers compared to less advanced (stage 1) ulcers (90641).
• Schizophrenia. Large doses of oral lysine seem to improve schizophrenia symptoms in patients taking antipsychotic medications. Details: Clinical research in people with schizophrenia not controlled by risperidone shows that taking L-lysine 2 grams three times daily for 8 weeks improves symptoms by approximately 34% when compared with placebo. Negative and psychopathologic symptoms appear to improve the most (90645). In patients stabilized on antipsychotic medications, preliminary clinical research suggests that taking L-lysine 6 grams once daily for 4 weeks improves positive symptoms of schizophrenia, particularly delusions and suspiciousness/persecution, when compared with baseline. However, this improvement was not significant when compared with placebo (90644).
• Stress. Limited clinical research in economically disadvantaged populations shows that fortifying wheat with lysine may reduce stress and anxiety. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming wheat that has been fortified with lysine 4.2 grams/kg reduces stress in females and reduces anxiety in males in economically disadvantaged populations that typically consume cereal-based diets when compared with control (19394). More evidence is needed to rate lysine for these uses.

(Read more about LYSINE)

EFFECTIVE

• Bowel preparation. Various magnesium salts are used for cleansing the bowel prior to procedures such as colonoscopy. Details: Various magnesium salts, including citrate, hydroxide, oxide, and sulfate, are ingredients in bowel preparation products available over-the-counter or by prescription only.
• Constipation. Magnesium salts are effective when used orally to treat constipation short-term. It is unclear if magnesium is beneficial for chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC). Details: Magnesium citrate, sulfate, and hydroxide salts are commonly used as laxatives. Magnesium citrate 8.75-25 grams has been used; magnesium hydroxide 2.4-4.8 grams, as 30-60 mL of milk of magnesia, has also been used (15). Magnesium sulfate, which seems to have the most potent effect, has been used as 10-30 grams (15,6430). Magnesium salts should only be used for occasional treatment of constipation, and doses should be taken with a full 8-ounce glass of water. There is also interest in using magnesium for symptomatic relief of CIC. A small clinical study in patients with CIC who are not taking chronic medications shows that taking magnesium oxide 1.5 grams in three divided doses daily for 28 days increases spontaneous bowel movements when compared with placebo (104397). It is unknown if magnesium is beneficial for CIC when used long-term.
• Dyspepsia. Magnesium salts are effective when used orally as antacids. Details: Magnesium carbonate, hydroxide, oxide, or trisilicate salts are used orally as antacids to reduce symptoms of gastric hyperacidity or gastroesophageal reflux. Magnesium hydroxide has the fastest onset of action. The onset for magnesium carbonate is slower due to its crystal structure. Magnesium trisilicate has the slowest onset and longest duration of action due to poor solubility (6844). Doses used include magnesium hydroxide 400-1200 mg (5-15 mL of milk of magnesia) up to four times daily, or magnesium oxide 800 mg daily (15).
• Eclampsia. Magnesium sulfate is considered the drug of choice for control of seizures. Details: Intravenous (IV) and/or intramuscular (IM) magnesium sulfate is considered the agent of choice for seizure prophylaxis during eclampsia by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) (15,12591,12592,61012,61184). Typical doses include 4-6 grams of magnesium sulfate by IV infusion in 250 mL of dextrose 5% or normal saline solution, followed by 4-5 grams of magnesium sulfate IM every 4 hours, or 1-3 grams per hour by continuous IV infusion. Doses should be adjusted according to serum levels and urinary excretion, and should not exceed 30-40 grams of magnesium sulfate daily (15,12591). Meta-analyses of clinical research show that treatment with IV or IM magnesium reduces the risk of seizure recurrence by 33% to 69% when compared with phenytoin, and by 47% to 60% when compared with diazepam (19960,60818,60954,60964,61105). One preliminary clinical study shows that lower doses of IV magnesium sulfate (9 grams loading dose and maintenance of 2.5 grams every 4 hours for 24 hours) are as effective as higher doses (14 grams loading dose and maintenance of 5 grams every 4 hours for 24 hours) for reducing the recurrence of eclamptic seizures (89383). It is generally recommended that treatment be continued for at least 24 hours after the last seizure (15). Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for eclampsia.
• Hypomagnesemia. Hypomagnesemia can be effectively treated with oral or parenteral magnesium. Details: Taking magnesium orally or parenterally is helpful for treating and preventing hypomagnesemia associated with alcoholism, cirrhosis of the liver, congestive heart failure (CHF), severe or prolonged diarrhea or vomiting, kidney dysfunction, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), pancreatitis, malabsorption syndromes, and other conditions (6280,6281,8088,8089). The dose and salt of magnesium for oral replacement therapy should be chosen carefully to avoid causing diarrhea. The gluconate and chloride salts cause less diarrhea, while the oxide salt is more likely to cause diarrhea and should be avoided. Magnesium chloride should also be avoided due to poor solubility which decreases absorption (6430,8099,10664). Orally, magnesium sulfate 3 grams every 6 hours for four doses has been used for hypomagnesemia (15). Parenteral magnesium doses must be individualized according to serum magnesium levels, but a typical starting dose for mild deficiency is 1 gram of magnesium sulfate intramuscularly (IM) every 6 hours for 4 doses (15). For more severe deficiency, 5 grams of magnesium sulfate may be given as an intravenous (IV) infusion in 1 liter of dextrose 5% or normal saline solution over 3 hours (15).
• Pre-eclampsia. Magnesium sulfate is considered the drug of choice for seizure prophylaxis in patients with pre-eclampsia. Details: Intravenous (IV) and/or intramuscular (IM) magnesium sulfate is considered the agent of choice for seizure prophylaxis during pre-eclampsia by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) (12591,12592,61012,61184). Some meta-analyses show that IV administration of magnesium sulfate reduces the risk of eclampsia when compared with placebo, phenytoin, or diazepam in patients with pre-eclampsia (19960,60818,60960,60979). A typical initial dose is 4-5 grams of magnesium sulfate by IV infusion in 250 mL of dextrose 5% or normal saline solution, followed by 4-5 grams of magnesium sulfate IM every 4 hours, or 1-3 grams of magnesium sulfate per hour by continuous IV infusion. Doses should be adjusted according to serum levels and urinary excretion, and should not exceed 30-40 grams of magnesium sulfate daily (15,12591). The optimal duration of prophylaxis has not been determined. A meta-analysis suggests that using a shorter duration of 12 hours or less is not associated with an increase in risk of eclamptic seizures when compared with regimens of 24 hours or longer (108732). However, studies are likely underpowered due to the low incidence of eclampsia. Oral magnesium has been evaluated for the prevention of pre-eclampsia in healthy adults, but taking magnesium citrate 300 mg daily, starting at 12-20 weeks' gestation and continuing until delivery, does not reduce the incidence of pre-eclampsia when compared with placebo (103724).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Cerebral palsy. Most evidence shows that antenatal magnesium reduces the risk of cerebral palsy in preterm infants, although there are some inconsistent results. Details: Most clinical studies and meta-analyses show that antenatal magnesium sulfate reduces the risk of cerebral palsy by about 32% and the risk of motor dysfunction by about 45% in preterm infants (60882,60915,60927,60931,61001,97485,103734,103754). The lowest effective dose of magnesium sulfate seems to be 4 grams intravenously, with or without a maintenance dose of 1 gram/hour until birth or for 24 hours. In obese females, a higher dose, based on body weight, may be needed (97485,97495,103734,103754). However, some studies have inconsistent results (8093,19998,98293,98295,112784). Giving females at risk of imminent preterm birth (prior to 32 weeks), intravenous magnesium sulfate 4.5 grams over 20 minutes followed by 1 gram per hour until birth or for 24 hours, in addition to a standard treatment protocol, does not reduce the incidence of cerebral palsy (112784). Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for this purpose.
• Seizures. Intravenous magnesium sulfate is used for treating seizures of various etiologies. Details: Intravenous magnesium sulfate may be useful for controlling seizures associated with epilepsy, glomerulonephritis, hypothyroidism, and acute nephritis in children (15). Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for this purpose.
• Torsades de pointes. Intravenous magnesium sulfate is the first-line treatment for torsades de pointes after measures to correct precipitating factors have been unsuccessful. Details: Intravenous magnesium sulfate has been used successfully to treat the life-threatening ventricular tachycardia, torsades de pointes (15,6844). The Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines of the American Heart Association recommend a dose of 1 to 2 grams diluted in 50-100 mL Dextrose 5% solution given IV over 5-60 minutes, followed by a continuous IV infusion of 0.5-1 gram/hour.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Arrhythmia. Magnesium sulfate is effective for the specific type of ventricular tachycardia known as torsades de pointes, and seems to be helpful for treating other types of arrhythmias. Evidence for the role of oral or intravenous magnesium in preventing postoperative arrhythmias is conflicting. Details: Administering magnesium intravenously or orally may be helpful for treating atrial and ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, and supraventricular tachycardia (9497,13352,13354,13355,13356,60804,60829,60877,61113,111696). Arrhythmias associated with congestive heart failure have been treated with magnesium sulfate 8 grams infused over 12 hours (9497). For rate control in atrial fibrillation, magnesium sulfate 2.5 grams IV over 20 minutes, followed by 2.5 grams IV over 2 hours has been used (13356). For paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, single doses of 1-4 grams of magnesium chloride have been used (13352). For atrial tachycardia, 2 grams of magnesium sulfate in 10 mL of dextrose 5% solution has been given IV over 1-10 minutes, followed by 5-10 grams of magnesium sulfate in 250-500 mL dextrose 5% solution as an IV infusion over 5 hours (13354,13355). Research on the effects of intravenous magnesium for preventing arrhythmias after cardiac surgery is conflicting. Some meta-analyses show that intravenous magnesium reduces the risk of atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias, or supraventricular arrhythmias following cardiac surgery by 23% to 48% when compared with placebo (60814,60826,60828,60838,61008,61033,61181,97487,97490). Doses of magnesium sulfate used include 30 mg/kg in 500 mL normal saline (97490), or 80-100 mg/kg added to the cardioplegia solution (97487). Also, one small study in adults after CABG surgery suggests that taking magnesium hydroxide 1600 mg orally reduces arrhythmia as effectively as receiving magnesium sulfate 2000 mg intravenously (99315). However, other meta-analyses that only include higher-quality trials show that magnesium supplementation does not reduce the risk of ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmias following cardiac surgery (61010,61024,61031,105081). A meta-analysis of clinical trials of intravenous magnesium for prevention of new-onset atrial fibrillation after non-cardiac surgeries shows that it does not reduce the incidence significantly when compared with placebo (112778). However, there was a high risk of bias in the analysis, and variability in types of surgery, and the salt and dose of magnesium used.
• Asthma. Parenteral magnesium sulfate can help to reverse severe acute asthma attacks and reduce the need for hospital admission. Oral or nebulized magnesium, however, does not seem to be beneficial. Details: Overall, a single dose of intravenous magnesium seems to improve pulmonary function in acute asthma exacerbation and reduce the risk of hospitalization, particularly in patients with severe asthma, and those who have failed initial treatment with nebulized albuterol and intravenous corticosteroids (60888,90023,96483,104398,107365). The typical dose used for adults is 2 grams of magnesium sulfate infused over 20 minutes (15). For children, 25-75 mg/kg, to a maximum of 2 grams, infused over 20-30 minutes has been used (15,96483,107365). However, a post-hoc analysis of one large clinical trial (104400) designed to assess nebulized magnesium in children with acute asthma has found that adding IV magnesium to nebulized magnesium is associated with greater odds of hospitalization when compared with no IV magnesium (105919). This post-hoc analysis did not differentiate between precautionary and necessary hospitalizations. Although some clinical research in patients with acute asthma exacerbation shows that nebulized magnesium in combination with albuterol significantly improves airway function when compared with albuterol alone, the benefit is not likely to be clinically relevant (90016). Most evidence, including larger clinical trials, has not shown benefit of adjunct nebulized magnesium for acute asthma in adults or children (60888,90002,96484,104400,105920). Oral magnesium also does not seem to be beneficial. A meta-analysis of small clinical trials in children and adults with asthma shows that taking magnesium supplements orally does not improve lung function or reduce bronchodilator use when compared with control (104404).
• Colorectal cancer. Increasing dietary magnesium intake seems to lower the risk of colon cancer but not rectal cancer. Details: Epidemiological research shows that increased dietary magnesium intake is associated with a reduced risk of colon cancer, but the risk of rectal cancer is not affected (89387,90017,90027,101355).
• Diabetes. Low dietary magnesium may increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, but evidence on the use of supplements for treating type 2 diabetes is conflicting. Details: Higher dietary magnesium intake is associated with lower fasting insulin concentrations and a reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes in adults and obese children (13369,15548,96473,97486,98294,103736,105918,106920). In people with existing type 2 diabetes, hypomagnesemia is found in 25% to 38% of patients, especially in those with poorly controlled diabetes (1172). Population research in adults with type 2 diabetes also shows that a dietary magnesium intake of less than 250 mg daily is associated with a 56% higher risk of mortality. Preliminary subgroup analyses suggest that the risk of mortality is higher in those with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels above 7% (110051). A meta-analysis of small, heterogeneous clinical studies in adults with type 2 diabetes suggests that magnesium may modestly reduce HbA1C in patients with hypomagnesemia, but not in patients with normal magnesium levels, when compared with control (105075). Individual clinical studies using magnesium supplements in patients with type 2 diabetes or insulin resistance have shown mixed results. Some research suggests magnesium supplements can decrease fasting blood glucose and improve insulin sensitivity, as well as reduce the risk of developing diabetes in high-risk patients (10664,12582,13376,60854,99313,106920), but other research shows no effect (1171,1172,13379,13380,112780). Discrepancies in these findings might reflect differences in magnesium salts and doses used, or differences in baseline magnesium status in study subjects.
• Hypercholesterolemia. Magnesium may help improve lipid levels by a small amount in people with this condition. Details: There is some evidence that taking magnesium oxide 1 gram orally daily for 6 weeks can produce small decreases in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol levels, and small increases in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. However, magnesium does not seem to improve lipoprotein (a) levels (1193). Magnesium may also lower triglycerides in people with hypertriglyceridemia (97494).
• Metabolic syndrome. Low dietary and serum levels of magnesium seem to be associated with the development of metabolic syndrome. Details: Higher magnesium intake from diet and supplements is associated with a 27% lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome in healthy females (13371) and a 31% lower risk in healthy young adults (14304). Additional epidemiological research suggests that people with low serum magnesium levels are 6-7 times more likely to have metabolic syndrome than people with normal magnesium levels (13372). In a population analysis of over 6000 individuals without metabolic syndrome at baseline, the risk of developing this condition over a 6-year follow-up period was reduced by 16% in the highest quintile of dietary magnesium intake (median intake 371 mg daily) when compared with the lowest quintile (median intake 203 mg daily). Some, but not all, research suggests that the hazard ratio for metabolic syndrome in relation to magnesium intake may be U-shaped, with higher risk at intakes below about 150 mg daily and above 600 mg daily (108963). A combination of magnesium 20 mEq daily and potassium 40 mEq daily (magnesium potassium citrate) taken orally for 16 weeks reverses metabolic side effects of chlorthalidone, such as increased fasting plasma glucose and hypokalemia, more effectively than potassium chloride 40 mEq daily alone (112932).
• Osteoporosis. Increased dietary and supplemental magnesium intake seems to increase bone mineral density and decrease bone loss in postmenopausal patients. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking magnesium hydroxide orally, 300-1800 mg daily for 6 months, then 600 mg daily for 18 months, or magnesium citrate orally 1830 mg daily for 30 days, might reduce bone loss and bone turnover in postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis (9104,60928). Some epidemiological research also suggests that magnesium intake is related to increased bone mineral density (12501,12502,12503,12504,90014), although not all studies have found an association (12505,98286).
• Postoperative pain. Injectable magnesium has been used with promising results for reducing pain postoperatively. Details: Intravenous magnesium sulfate, 5-50 mg/kg bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 6 mg/kg or 500 mg hourly during surgery, seems to reduce the 24-hour postoperative use of intravenous morphine by 24% when compared with placebo (19968). Adding intravenous magnesium sulfate 3.7-5.5 grams to patient-controlled analgesia for 24 hours after surgery has also been used (19968). Meta-analyses also support that adjunctive intravenous and intrathecal administration of magnesium improves pain relief and sensory nerve block, and decreases the need for other analgesics, when compared with control (89390,90012,90015,98287,103728); however, it appears to be less effective than dexmedetomidine (105082). A moderate-sized clinical study in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in China shows that adding magnesium sulfate 2.5 mg/mL to the periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) cocktail reduces pain scores, limits the use of postoperative morphine, prolongs analgesia, and reduces markers of inflammation when compared with the usual PIA cocktail (111181). Administering magnesium intravenously also seems to be helpful for pain control after hysterectomy. A 3-gram IV bolus of magnesium sulfate followed by an infusion of 0.5 grams per hour for 20 hours has been used. Lower doses were not effective (6848). In males undergoing laparoscopic radical resection for gastrointestinal cancer, administering intravenous magnesium intraoperatively, as a loading dose of 40 mg/kg followed by 15 mg/kg/hour through the end of surgery, reduces postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort and analgesic requirements, when compared with placebo (112783). However, intravenous magnesium might not alleviate postoperative pain in children. Two small clinical studies show that administering a magnesium intravenous infusion does not reduce pain when compared with saline in children after tonsillectomy or after elective strabismus surgery (98282,105077).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Taking magnesium orally seems to relieve symptoms of PMS. Details: There is some evidence that magnesium supplementation can improve symptoms, including mood changes and fluid retention, in some patients with PMS (1187,1188,6847). Doses used include magnesium oxide 333 mg daily for 2 menstrual cycles, or magnesium pyrrolidone carboxylic acid equivalent to 360 mg elemental magnesium three times daily, from the 15th day of the menstrual cycle until onset of menstrual flow (1187,1188). Taking magnesium orally in a dose of 360 mg (elemental magnesium) three times daily for 2 months seems to prevent premenstrual migraine (1186,6847). A combination of magnesium 200 mg daily plus vitamin B6 50 mg daily seems to reduce anxiety-related premenstrual symptoms, including nervous tension, mood swings, irritability, and anxiety, when compared with placebo (8555).
• Vasospastic angina. Intravenous magnesium seems to prevent coronary spasm in patients with this condition. Details: Clinical research shows that administration of intravenous magnesium sulfate 65 mg/kg infused over 20 minutes dilates coronary arteries and suppresses acetylcholine-induced coronary spasms when compared with infusion of a dextrose solution in patients with vasospastic angina (8091).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Altitude sickness. Taking magnesium citrate orally does not seem to reduce acute altitude sickness risk. Details: Clinical research shows that taking magnesium citrate 1200 mg daily orally in three divided doses, beginning 3 days prior to mountain ascent and continuing until mountain descent, does not reduce the risk of acute altitude sickness when compared with placebo (60801).
• Athletic performance. Taking magnesium orally does not seem to improve energy or endurance during athletic activity. Details: Most evidence suggests that taking magnesium orally doesn't increase energy and endurance during athletic activity. Magnesium oxide, aspartate, and orotate salts don't seem to improve exercise performance when used alone or in combination with potassium (2825,2826,2828,2829,2830,60751).
• Bronchiolitis. Intravenous or nebulized magnesium is not beneficial in infants with this condition. Details: Clinical research shows that administering a single IV dose of magnesium sulfate 100 mg/kg to infants with acute bronchiolitis does not improve, and may actually worsen, symptoms when compared with placebo (97482). A clinical study in infants with moderate to severe bronchiolitis shows that adding nebulized magnesium sulfate 40 mg/kg to nebulized epinephrine does not reduce hospital stay or the need for ventilator or oxygen support when compared with epinephrine alone (99317). Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for this use.
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Research on the effects of intravenous infusions of magnesium and calcium for preventing oxaliplatin neurotoxicity are inconsistent, but higher quality studies seem to show no benefit. Details: Pooled analyses of cohort studies and clinical trials show that calcium and magnesium infusions can decrease the incidence of severe oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). However, when only clinical trials are considered, the infusions do not appear to be helpful (90005,90029,90031,96474,96479).
• Complex regional pain syndrome. Intravenous magnesium is not beneficial in complex regional pain syndrome type 1. Details: Clinical research shows that receiving magnesium sulfate 70 mg/kg intravenously at the rate of 25 mL/hour for 4 hours each day for 5 days does not improve pain or level of impairment when compared with placebo in patients with chronic complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (89395).
• Emergence delirium. The majority of small clinical studies in adults and children undergoing various surgeries suggest that intravenous (IV) magnesium doesn't reduce the risk of emergence delirium. Details: A small clinical study in adults undergoing surgery for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair shows that administering IV magnesium 30 mg/kg as a loading dose, followed by a 10 mg/kg/hour infusion for the duration of surgery, does not improve agitation or delirium scores when compared with administering saline (111182). Similarly, a small clinical study in children ages 2-5 years undergoing elective strabismus surgery shows that administering IV magnesium during anesthesia does not seem to prevent the occurrence of emergence delirium when compared with administering saline (105077). In a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials in children aged 2-16 years undergoing general anesthesia for oral or ophthalmic surgery, giving IV magnesium as a 30 mg/kg loading dose followed by a 10 mg/kg/hour infusion, or as a single dose of 15-30 mg/kg, does not reduce emergence delirium scores, and may actually prolong emergence times (108729). However, there is some conflicting evidence. In patients undergoing radical mastectomy, giving intraoperative magnesium sulfate 30mg/kg over 1 hour, followed by 10 mg/kg/hour until the end of surgery, reduces emergence agitation (odds ratio 0.26) when compared with placebo (112781).
• Menopausal symptoms. Oral magnesium oxide does not seem to be beneficial for menopausal hot flashes. Details: A small, low quality study in postmenopausal patients with a history of breast cancer shows that taking magnesium oxide 400-800 mg orally daily reduces hot flashes when compared with baseline (102454). However, a larger, higher quality clinical study using magnesium oxide 800-1200 mg daily did not show any benefit when compared with placebo (98290).
• Muscle cramps. Oral magnesium does not seem to improve muscle cramp frequency or intensity. Details: Meta-analyses of small clinical trials show that magnesium supplementation for 3-6 weeks does not decrease the frequency or intensity of skeletal muscle cramps, whether the cramps are idiopathic or due to liver cirrhosis or pregnancy, when compared with placebo (90022,104395).
• Sickle cell disease. Intravenous magnesium does not add any benefit to standard therapy for sickle cell disease in children. Details: Clinical research shows that giving magnesium sulfate 40-100 mg/kg (maximum of 2 grams per dose) intravenously every hour for 6-8 doses as an adjunct to standard therapy does not decrease hospital stay, pain, or opioid use, or improve quality of life, when compared with standard therapy and placebo in children with sickle cell disease (89399,98283,101356). Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for this purpose.
• Stillbirth. Magnesium administered during pregnancy does not reduce stillbirth risk. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that magnesium supplementation does not significantly decrease the risk of stillbirths when administered during pregnancy (60925,60978).
• Tetanus. Intravenous magnesium sulfate does not seem to improve outcomes in patients with this condition. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous magnesium sulfate does not reduce mortality when compared with placebo or diazepam in patients with tetanus (61020). While some research shows that magnesium reduces the duration of hospitalization and the need for ventilation when compared with diazepam (61170), magnesium does not seem to improve these outcomes when compared with placebo (60860).
• Traumatic brain injury (TBI). Magnesium does not improve clinical outcomes in patients with moderate to severe TBI. Its effect in patients with concussions is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of four clinical trials shows that treatment with magnesium does not significantly improve neurological outcomes or reduce the risk of mortality when compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe TBI (60905). A small observational cohort study in adolescents with concussions has found that adding oral magnesium 400 mg twice daily for 5 days to standard treatment with acetaminophen and ondansetron is associated with a trend toward reduced symptom severity when compared with standard treatment alone (104401). The validity of this study is limited by its observational nature and small cohort size.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. Intravenous magnesium does not seem to help reduce symptoms of alcohol withdrawal but may reduce the duration of alcoholic delirium. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that administration of four intramuscular injections of magnesium sulfate 2 grams at 6-hour intervals does not reduce symptoms of alcohol withdrawal when compared with saline (61063). A small observational study in patients with alcoholic delirium has found that administering magnesium sulfate IV 50 mg/kg every 8 hours, in addition to usual sedation, is associated with a reduction of delirium by approximately 2 days, or 4 days when given every 12 hours in addition to dexmedetomidine, when compared with usual sedation alone (111180). However, half of patients had hypomagnesemia at baseline; it is unclear if effects would be similar for patients with normal magnesium levels. Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for this purpose.
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there has been interest in using oral magnesium for allergic rhinitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of magnesium for this purpose.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial in children with ADHD. Details: Children with ADHD seem to have lower magnesium levels in their blood and hair (9969,100262,100263). A small clinical study in children aged 7-12 years with ADHD and magnesium deficiency shows that taking magnesium aspartate and lactate 6 mg/kg daily for 6 months might improve hyperactivity and magnesium levels when compared with control (1189). Another small clinical study in children with ADHD but without magnesium deficiency shows that taking magnesium 6 mg/kg daily along with vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks may modestly improve emotional problems, but not inattention or hyperactivity, as measured on the strength and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ), when compared with placebo (105914).
• Back pain. It is unclear if oral or intravenous magnesium is beneficial for acute or chronic back pain in adults. Details: One open-label clinical study in adults with acute low-back pain shows that taking magnesium 365 mg once daily in addition to taking etodolac 400 mg twice daily for 10 days does not further reduce pain when compared with taking etodolac alone (105913). Magnesium has also been tried for chronic back pain. A small clinical study in patients with chronic low-back pain shows that receiving magnesium sulfate 1 gram in 250 mL normal saline intravenously every 4 hours for 2 weeks, followed by magnesium gluconate 100 mg and magnesium oxide 400 mg by mouth daily for 4 weeks, reduces pain severity when compared with placebo (90035). It is unclear if oral magnesium used alone is beneficial.
• Bariatric surgery complications. It is unclear if oral magnesium supplementation improves metabolic parameters after bariatric surgery. Details: A retrospective study of over 3000 post-bariatric surgery patients suggests that those who take oral magnesium supplements providing 100-450 mg elemental magnesium daily may have improved metabolic parameters over 4 years of follow-up. When patients taking magnesium supplements were compared with those not taking supplements, 11% and 18% had type 2 diabetes, respectively, 30% and 42% had hypertension, respectively, and 16% and 23% had elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, respectively. For patients with hypomagnesemia at baseline, supplementation seemed to result in greater benefits (108968).
• Bipolar disorder. Taking magnesium orally might improve manic symptoms in some people with bipolar disorder; however, it is unclear how it compares to current standard of care. Details: One preliminary clinical study shows that magnesium 40 mEq daily (Magnesiocard) for 32 weeks has similar effects to lithium in up to 50% of patients treated for rapid cycling bipolar affective disorder (61022). Another preliminary clinical study shows that magnesium oxide 375 mg orally daily plus verapamil 80 mg taken four times daily reduces manic symptoms more effectively than verapamil alone in patients with mania (60742).
• Cancer-related neuropathic pain. It is unclear if intravenous magnesium is beneficial for this condition. Details: Single 500 mg to 1 gram doses of magnesium sulfate seem to relieve neuropathic pain for up to four hours when compared to baseline (6846). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Chemotherapy-induced leukopenia. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial in pediatric patients at risk for cisplatin-induced febrile neutropenia. Details: A small clinical study in children with solid tumors aged 9 years and older shows that taking magnesium 250 mg daily while receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy reduces febrile neutropenia by 47% and septic shock by 57% when compared with not receiving magnesium. Results from this study suggest that four pediatric patients need to take oral magnesium to avoid one case of febrile neutropenia (104394).
• Cardiac arrest. Intravenous magnesium does not seem to be helpful in cardiac arrest; however, the risk of sudden cardiac death seems to be inversely correlated to higher plasma magnesium levels or dietary intake. It is unclear if magnesium supplementation is associated with similar risk reduction. Details: Administering magnesium intravenously doesn't seem to improve successful resuscitation in people with cardiac arrest (1190). However, higher plasma magnesium levels and higher dietary magnesium intake might reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death, possibly by protecting against fatal ventricular arrhythmias. In the Nurses' Health Study, the risk of sudden cardiac death was 77% lower in females with the highest quartile of plasma magnesium levels when compared with the lowest quartile. Also, the risk was 37% lower in females with the highest quartile of dietary magnesium intake when compared with the lowest quartile (17132).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Evidence regarding the effect of dietary magnesium on CVD risk is conflicting. Details: Epidemiological research in some populations shows that increased dietary magnesium intake is associated with decreased mortality due to strokes, coronary heart disease, ischemic heart disease, and heart failure, but other epidemiological research does not show any effect on these risks (89391,90003,90009,90030,90036,103735). Reasons for the discrepancies may be related to serum levels of magnesium at baseline, risk of cardiovascular disease at baseline, use of concomitant medications such as diuretics, or the presence of concomitant conditions such as kidney dysfunction. A population analysis conducted in Denmark has found that magnesium intake from drinking water may be associated with cardiovascular mortality. The overall risk of cardiovascular death and death due to stroke was reduced by 4% in the lowest 3 quintiles of intake when compared with the highest quintile. However, the risk of death due to acute myocardial infarction was increased by 22% in the lowest quintile when compared with the highest (108726). The relevance of these results is unclear, given that the main dietary source of magnesium is food rather than drinking water.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Limited evidence suggests that magnesium may help improve CFS symptoms, but this is controversial. Details: In people with low red blood cell magnesium, there is some evidence that intramuscular injections of 1 gram magnesium sulfate given once weekly for 6 weeks might improve CFS symptoms (7556). However, there is additional evidence that most patients with CFS have normal magnesium stores, and measurement of red cell magnesium is a poor indicator of total magnesium stores (7557,8084,8085,8086,8087).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Intravenous, but not nebulized, magnesium may be helpful in acute exacerbations of COPD. Details: Administering magnesium sulfate intravenously, 1.2-2.5 grams over 20 minutes, might be helpful for treating acute exacerbations of COPD (1208,6844,103733). Also, giving magnesium sulfate 2 grams intravenously seems to improve exercise capacity when compared with placebo (89384). A meta-analysis of studies using intravenous magnesium sulfate for COPD exacerbations shows that it reduces hospital admission and mean length of stay and improves dyspnea scores when compared with placebo. Based on the relative risk identified in the included studies, seven patients would need to receive intravenous magnesium to prevent one hospitalization. However, intravenous magnesium sulfate does not change the need for non-invasive ventilation and the available research did not evaluate intensive care unit (ICU) admission (108967). Nebulized magnesium has also been evaluated. In patients experiencing a COPD exacerbation, clinical research shows that administering nebulized magnesium sulfate with albuterol three times at 30-minute intervals does not improve pulmonary function as measured by the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) when compared with placebo (89393). Also, a meta-analysis of a small number of low-quality studies shows that nebulized magnesium does not reduce hospital admission or the need for ventilatory support, although it might modestly improve dyspnea scores and reduce ICU admissions, when compared with placebo (108967).
• Cluster headache. It is unclear if a single intravenous dose of magnesium sulfate is beneficial for cluster headaches. Details: Administering magnesium sulfate intravenously, 1 gram over 5 minutes, seems to improve cluster headaches when compared with baseline(1184). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Cognitive impairment. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for cognitive impairment. Details: A large observational study in adults with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis suggests that serum magnesium levels of 20.2-22.3 mg/dL are associated with the lowest odds of mild cognitive impairment, while serum magnesium levels below and above that range of values are associated with increased odds of mild cognitive impairment (111695).
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). It is unclear if magnesium supplementation is beneficial for CHD. Details: Clinical research shows that magnesium oxide 800-1200 mg daily for 3 months reduces platelet-dependent thrombosis by 35% when compared with placebo in patients with CHD (60759). It is unclear if this effect improves clinical outcomes. The effect of magnesium supplementation on coronary artery calcium has also been studied. A meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies in 196 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) shows that taking magnesium or increasing the concentration of magnesium in dialysate does not improve coronary artery calcification (CAC) scores when compared with standard therapy. However, magnesium reduced carotid intima-media thickness (111179). Similarly, a large clinical study in patients with CKD shows that taking slow-release magnesium hydroxide (Mablet, Denmark) 360 mg twice daily for 12 months does not slow the progression of CAC scores when compared with placebo (111178). This study may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Depression. It is unclear if magnesium is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of depression in adults. Details: Some population research shows that dietary intake of elemental magnesium between 76-360 mg daily is associated with a reduced risk of depression, but there was no association with greater amounts of magnesium, and other population research shows no association at any intake level (96480,98289). For treatment of mild to moderate depression, one preliminary clinical study shows that taking magnesium chloride 2 grams orally daily for 6 weeks reduces depression scores by 56% and anxiety scores by about 52% when compared to baseline (96477). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group. However, a small clinical study in adults with recurrent depression shows that taking magnesium aspartate 120 mg daily for 8 weeks, along with fluoxetine, does not improve depression scores when compared with patients taking fluoxetine and placebo (111185). Similarly, a very small crossover clinical study in adults with mild or moderate treatment-resistant depression shows that administering a single dose of IV magnesium sulfate 4 grams does not improve depression scores when compared with an infusion of 5% dextrose (96481). However, scores were evaluated 24 hours post-infusion which may be too soon to detect improvement. Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that elemental magnesium in doses of 100-400 mg is not recommended for adjunctive or monotherapy use in patients with depression (110318).
• Diabetic foot ulcers. Oral magnesium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with grade 3 diabetic foot ulcers shows that taking magnesium oxide 250 mg plus vitamin E 400 IU daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces ulcer size when compared with placebo (101436). It is unclear if this effect is due to magnesium, vitamin E, or the combination.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral magnesium reduces muscle soreness in adults after resistance training. Details: A very small study in healthy adults, ages 19-23, shows that taking magnesium glycinate 350 mg daily for 10 days seems to reduce muscle soreness after bench press exercise when compared with placebo (104399).
• Fibromyalgia. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for this condition. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking magnesium chloride orally 100 mg once daily for one month reduces mild to moderate, but not severe, stress associated with fibromyalgia when compared with placebo. It also reduces pain levels, but not to a clinically significant extent, and it does not affect sleep, fatigue, or quality of life (108964). Another small clinical study shows that taking magnesium citrate 300 mg daily for 8 weeks improves some symptoms of fibromyalgia, such as number of tender points and depression, when compared to baseline (89385). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. A small clinical study shows that taking a combination of magnesium hydroxide and malic acid (Super Malic tablets) orally decreases fibromyalgia-related pain and tenderness in some patients when compared with placebo (3262). It is unclear if this effect is due to magnesium, malic acid, or the combination.
• Fractures. Population research suggests that higher intakes of magnesium may reduce fracture risk. Details: Observational research has found that higher dietary and supplemental magnesium intake is associated with a 34% lower odds of fracture when compared with lower magnesium intake (101395).
• Gastric cancer. Population research suggests that higher intakes of magnesium may reduce gastric cancer risk. Details: Observational research has found that higher dietary and supplemental magnesium intake is not associated with a reduced risk for gastric cancer when compared with lower intake (103730).
• Hearing loss. Oral magnesium may prevent and improve hearing loss due to environmental factors or loud noises. Details: Clinical research in healthy military recruits shows that taking magnesium aspartate 167 mg daily for 2 months prevents hearing loss from exposure to loud noises during basic military training when compared with placebo (1205). Also, in patients with acute-onset hearing loss that was not caused by environmental factors, taking magnesium aspartate 167 mg daily for 8 weeks seems to improve hearing loss when compared with placebo (60813).
• Hypertension. Oral magnesium supplementation may modestly reduce blood pressure, although these changes are not likely to be considered clinically significant. Details: Most research shows that taking oral magnesium supplements in daily doses that are at least as high as the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for adults and up to 1000 mg daily can lower diastolic blood pressure by about 2 mmHg in adults with or without hypertension (1192,1199,9465,15165,18111,96482). Significantly lower doses do not seem to have this effect (1180,1195,1197,8098). The effect of magnesium on systolic blood pressure is conflicting. One meta-analysis shows that taking magnesium 240-970 mg daily does not lower systolic blood pressure (15165). However, more recent meta-analyses show that taking magnesium 120-970 mg daily can lower systolic blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner by about 2-4 mmHg in patients with or without hypertension (18111,96482). In 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that inconsistent and inconclusive evidence suggests that diets with adequate magnesium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure. Products bearing this claim must provide at least 84 mg of magnesium daily, but no more than 350 mg daily (107451).
• Hypokalemia. It is unclear if intravenous or oral magnesium is beneficial for hypokalemia in patients with normal magnesium levels. Details: A preliminary retrospective observational study in patients with hypokalemia and unknown serum magnesium levels has found that administering oral or intravenous magnesium is not associated with improved time to normalization of serum potassium levels when compared with no magnesium treatment (110049). However, hypokalemia with concurrent hypomagnesemia can impede potassium repletion and exacerbate hypokalemia-induced rhythm disturbances. Standard of care in patients with hypokalemia and known hypomagnesemia includes prompt treatment with magnesium (110063).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for prediabetes. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with prediabetes shows that taking magnesium oxide 250 mg orally daily for 12 weeks does not improve fasting blood glucose levels, insulin resistance, or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels when compared with placebo. Taking magnesium also did not affect blood pressure, body weight, triglyceride levels, or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels; however, it did modestly improve high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (110053).
• Insomnia. Oral magnesium may modestly improve sleep complaints in adults, but evidence is conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of two small clinical studies in healthy older adults with or without insomnia suggests that taking magnesium reduces the time to fall asleep by an average of 17 minutes when compared with placebo (105917). However, it does not increase the time spent asleep. Also, these findings are limited by imprecision and a high risk of bias. Studies included in the analysis used elemental magnesium 500-729 mg daily (as magnesium oxide) for up to 8 weeks (102458,105917). Another small clinical study in patients with poor sleep quality and low magnesium status shows that taking elemental magnesium 320 mg (as magnesium citrate) in divided doses daily for 7 weeks does not improve sleep quality, as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), when compared with a sodium citrate placebo (102456). A very small crossover clinical study in patients aged 18-40 years without a sleep disorder shows that taking a combination of magnesium 300 mg, L-tryptophan 1000 mg, glycine 3000 mg, tart cherry 220 mg, and theanine 200 mg for 3 days reduces the time to fall asleep by about 24 minutes, increases total time asleep by about 22 minutes, and improves sleep efficiency, but does not improve the total time in bed or wakefulness after falling asleep when compared with cellulose placebo (111184). It is unclear if these effects are due to magnesium, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Intraventricular hemorrhage. It is unclear if antenatal intravenous magnesium sulfate can reduce the risk for intraventricular hemorrhage in neonates. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in premature infants shows that if the mother received antenatal intravenous magnesium sulfate, the infant had a non-significant trend toward a reduced risk of intraventricular hemorrhage when compared with infants whose mothers received placebo (103727). This analysis may have been insufficiently powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Taking magnesium orally may prevent the recurrence of kidney stones, although evidence is conflicting. Details: Prophylactic treatment with magnesium hydroxide, 200 mg twice daily for one year, followed by 500 mg daily for another year, might decrease the recurrence rate of calcium stone formation (2007). However, magnesium oxide does not seem to benefit patients considered to be recurrent calcium stone formers when compared with placebo, no treatment, or chlorthalidone (8097,38501,61199). Magnesium oxide 300 mg in combination with vitamin B6 10 mg daily seems to decrease urinary oxalate levels in people with hyperoxaluria who have previously had kidney stones (1201), but it is unclear if this effect translates into a reduced incidence of kidney stones.
• Liver cancer. Increased dietary magnesium intake is linked with a lower risk of liver cancer. Details: Observational research in retired older Americans has found that higher dietary magnesium intake is associated with a 35% lower risk of liver cancer when compared with lower intake. This association was especially strong in persons who were moderate or heavy alcohol users (105080).
• Migraine headache. Oral magnesium may help prevent migraine in some adults and children. Also, intravenous magnesium may help treat migraine in adults, but evidence is conflicting. Details: Small clinical studies in adults with migraine suggest that taking oral high-dose magnesium citrate 600-1830 mg daily in divided doses for up to 3 months seems to modestly reduce the frequency and severity of headaches when compared with baseline or placebo (4891,9498,60902). Limited evidence suggests that adding oral magnesium to conventional treatment may also be beneficial. A clinical study in adults with migraine living in Iran shows that taking magnesium oxide 250 mg twice daily in addition to sodium valproate 200 mg twice daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces severity and duration of migraine, but not migraine frequency, when compared with taking sodium valproate alone (105915). It is unclear if these improvements would be considered clinically significant. In contrast, one small clinical study shows that taking magnesium does not reduce migraine frequency and severity by at least 50% in adults when compared with placebo (10661). For treatment of migraine, some adults with normal magnesium levels respond to intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate 1 gram over 5 minutes, but most patients who benefit have low magnesium levels at baseline (1185,6844). Effects of IV magnesium in patients with unknown magnesium levels are conflicting. Some preliminary clinical research shows that magnesium 1-2 grams IV alleviates acute migraine for up to 2 hours, but other research has found no benefit (89388,97493,98285). In children, treatment with magnesium oxide orally 15 mg/kg daily in 3 divided doses for up to 16 weeks reduces the frequency and severity of migraine headaches when compared with placebo (10663). However, adding magnesium sulfate 400 mg orally daily to ibuprofen or acetaminophen does not further reduce migraine severity in children (89396).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Research on the effects of intravenous or oral magnesium after myocardial infarction are conflicting. Details: Administering magnesium intravenously doesn't seem to reduce mortality after an acute MI (8999,13357,13358,13359,13360,19990,60872,61082), although there is some conflicting evidence from a meta-analysis of clinical research that shows that intravenous magnesium sulfate may reduce short-term mortality by 55% when compared with placebo (60795,60895). Clinical research with oral magnesium supplementation has found no benefit (1198,6844).
• Neonatal encephalopathy. Intravenous magnesium may improve short-term outcomes in neonates with encephalopathy. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous magnesium may improve short term outcomes of neonatal encephalopathy (hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, HIE). However, long term outcomes are not affected (90025).
• Nocturnal leg cramps. It is unclear if oral magnesium is helpful for nocturnal leg cramps. Details: Some clinical research in adults with nocturnal leg cramps shows that taking magnesium oxide 865 mg daily at bedtime for 4 weeks does not reduce the frequency of leg cramping episodes when compared with placebo (96478). However, four weeks may be too short a time to see a benefit. In other clinical research, taking oral magnesium oxide monohydrate 226mg daily at bedtime for 60 days reduces the frequency of leg cramps when compared with placebo. This reduction was not seen after 30 days. Magnesium also reduced cramp duration and improved sleep quality, but did not affect pain scores, at 60 days when compared with placebo (106919).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Oral magnesium hydroxide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults with NAFLD shows that taking magnesium hydroxide 150 mg and L-carnitine 2000 mg daily for 16 weeks does not improve liver stiffness scores when compared with baseline or controls who took placebo for 8 weeks followed by this magnesium and L- carnitine combination for 8 weeks. Taking magnesium and L-carnitine also did not improve levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) when compared to baseline (111177).
• Obesity. Evidence on the use of magnesium for weight loss in obese patients is conflicting; any benefit is likely small at best. Details: A meta-analysis of 7 clinical studies in obese patients shows that taking magnesium reduces body mass index (BMI) by 0.3 when compared with control (103723). Another meta-analysis of 7 studies in obese patients shows that while magnesium supplementation does not reduce weight, it reduces waist circumference by 2 cm when compared with placebo (103729). Interestingly, subgroup analyses did not find that the dose of magnesium or baseline magnesium levels impacted effectiveness. One subgroup analysis found that magnesium supplementation lasting 12 weeks or less seemed to be more beneficial for obesity than supplementation lasting longer than 12 weeks (103723).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if oral or IV magnesium reduces the risk of overall mortality. Details: A meta-analysis of heterogeneous observational studies has found that increased dietary magnesium intake, but not supplemental magnesium intake, is associated with a modestly reduced risk of overall mortality (105073). A meta-analysis of 3 small, low-quality clinical studies in ICU patients shows that administering IV magnesium 24-30 mmol or as a target-directed dose for 3 days reduces overall mortality when compared with patients who did not receive magnesium (111290). However, some studies included patients with hypomagnesemia; it is unclear if effects would be similar for patients with normal levels of magnesium.
• Osteoarthritis. Population research has not found a link between magnesium intake and osteoarthritis risk. Details: Observational research has found that dietary and supplemental magnesium intake is not associated with the risk of developing osteoarthritis (101395).
• Pain (acute). It is unclear if intravenous magnesium is helpful for acute pain associated with kidney dysfunction. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with renal colic shows that intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate, 50 mg/kg infused over 20 minutes, is as effective as IV morphine sulfate 0.1 mg/kg for controlling acute renal pain at 20 minutes after the dose (107367).
• Pain (chronic). Population research suggests that higher intakes of magnesium may modestly reduce the risk for chronic pain. Details: A cross-sectional observational study has found that increased magnesium intake is associated with a 7% to 8% reduced risk for chronic pain. The association was found to be stronger in females than in males (103732).
• Perioperative anxiety. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for perioperative anxiety. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing open heart surgery shows that taking magnesium oxide 250 mg orally twice daily during hospitalization moderately improves anxiety and depression scores when compared with no magnesium therapy. Magnesium therapy was held for the 2 days immediately following surgery (110054).
• Postoperative sore throat. It is unclear if topical magnesium sulfate is beneficial for reducing sore throat pain after endotracheal intubation. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation for surgery shows that using a gargle containing magnesium sulfate 20% with lidocaine, 20 minutes before anesthesia induction, is less effective for reducing sore throat pain than a gargle containing dexmedetomidine and lidocaine (112779). The study did not include a comparison to lidocaine alone.
• Physical performance. Oral magnesium may modestly improve physical performance in otherwise healthy, elderly females. Details: Clinical research in otherwise healthy elderly females shows that taking a magnesium oxide supplement (Easymag, Sanofi-Aventis) 900 mg daily for 12 weeks modestly improves walking speed and chair stand speed in elderly females when compared with no treatment (90026).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for improving metabolic indices in patients with PCOS. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with PCOS show that taking magnesium oxide orally, 250 mg daily for 8 weeks, does not affect insulin resistance, beta-cell function, lipid levels, or insulin sensitivity when compared with placebo (103725,105887). Other clinical research in patients with PCOS shows that taking magnesium oxide orally, 250 mg daily for 10 weeks, improves subjective measures of quality of life, fatigue, and emotional functioning, but not objective measures such as alopecia, abnormal uterine bleeding, or acne, when compared with placebo (108965). A clinical study using a combination of magnesium 250 mg with vitamin E 400 mg daily for 12 weeks shows a modest reduction in insulin resistance, insulin levels, and triglyceride levels, but not other lipid levels, when compared with placebo (100264). It is unclear if these beneficial effects are due to magnesium, vitamin E, or the combination.
• Postoperative sleep disturbance. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for postoperative sleep disturbances. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing open heart surgery shows that taking magnesium oxide 250 mg orally twice daily during hospitalization moderately improves sleep scores when compared with no magnesium therapy. Magnesium therapy was held for the 2 days immediately following surgery (110054).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral magnesium reduces leg cramps during pregnancy; evidence is conflicting. Details: One small clinical study in patients with pregnancy-related leg cramps shows that taking magnesium bisglycinate chelate 300 mg daily for 4 weeks reduces the frequency and intensity of leg cramps when compared with placebo (99318). A smaller clinical study in this population shows that taking a specific mixture of magnesium lactate and citrate (Nycoplus Magnesium) providing elemental magnesium 120 mg in the morning and 240 mg in the evening for 3 weeks reduces the frequency of cramps when compared with placebo (1194). However, not all research agrees. One small clinical study using this same supplement and dose for 2 weeks found no benefit when compared with placebo (17463). It is possible that a 2-week duration of treatment is too short to be beneficial. Finally, a meta-analysis of these studies and one other more recent clinical study shows that taking magnesium does not reduce the frequency or improve the resolution of pregnancy-related leg cramps when compared with placebo (105916). This analysis may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference between treatment groups.
• Pre-procedural sedation. It is unclear if intravenous magnesium is beneficial when administered in addition to propofol for sedation. Details: A moderate-sized study of adults aged 65-79 years old undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) shows that administering a single intravenous bolus of magnesium sulfate 40 mg/kg prior to the procedure reduces intraoperative propofol requirements by about 21% and reduces some peri-procedural adverse events including the incidence of respiratory depression and involuntary movement when compared with control. However, there were no differences in recovery time, hemodynamic parameters, or the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, perioperative nausea or vomiting, lethargy, or arrythmias (111694).
• Preterm labor. The use of magnesium sulfate to inhibit uterine contractions in preterm labor (tocolysis) is controversial. However, its use for the purpose of fetal neuroprotection for up to 48 hours is supported by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Details: Magnesium is given intravenously during preterm labor in an effort to improve fetal neurological outcomes. The typical dosage of magnesium sulfate is 4 grams infused IV over 10-30 minutes, followed by a maintenance infusion of 1-4 grams/hour for 48 hours or until birth. Use beyond 5-7 days has been associated with hypocalcemia and bone abnormalities in the fetus (15,12590,12594). Some meta-analyses of clinical research suggest that magnesium sulfate is more effective at delaying delivery by 48 hours when compared with oxytocin receptor blockers, nitrates, beta-mimetics, and/or placebo (20263,61021). Administration of magnesium during preterm labor has been shown to reduce the risk of cerebral palsy and motor dysfunction in the infant (60882,60915,60927,60931,61001,97485,103734,103754).
• Pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE). It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for PXE. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with PXE shows that taking magnesium oxide 800 mg (500 mg of elemental magnesium) twice daily for one year tends to reduce calcification of elastic skin fibers when compared with placebo, but the effect is not statistically significant (101393). This study was limited by small size and insufficient power to detect smaller effects.
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for RLS. Details: Some observational research has found that hypomagnesemia is associated with RLS; however, not all research agrees (8096,9472). Preliminary clinical research in adults with RLS who are beginning treatment with pramipexole shows that also taking magnesium oxide 250 mg orally daily for 2 months moderately improves RLS scores and sleep quality scores when compared with pramipexole and placebo (110052). Other low-quality clinical research in adults with RLS or periodic limb movement during sleep shows that taking magnesium 12.4 mmol orally in the evening for 4-6 weeks decreases movement and increases sleep when compared with baseline (9466). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Sarcopenia. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of sarcopenia. Details: Population research in older adults has found that lower dietary intake of magnesium is associated with sarcopenia. However, the effect of magnesium supplementation on sarcopenia prevention or treatment has not been evaluated (110055).
• Stroke. Increased dietary magnesium may decrease stroke risk, and using a magnesium-containing salt substitute may improve neurological performance post-stroke. However, intravenous magnesium has not demonstrated benefit. Details: Most population research has found that increased dietary intake of magnesium is associated with decreased stroke risk and decreased mortality from stroke (9001,9002,90013,90030,90036,92107,103736). In patients who have had a stroke, a preliminary clinical study shows that using a salt substitute providing the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) of magnesium and potassium for 6 months improves neurological performance when compared with using regular salt (97491). However, intravenous (IV) magnesium does not seem to be beneficial in patients who have had a stroke. Large prospective clinical trials show that IV magnesium given within 12 hours of acute stroke does not reduce mortality or disability in most patients when compared with placebo. However, one subgroup analysis suggested that IV magnesium might benefit patients with lacunar (non-cortical) stroke (13361,90021). IV magnesium also doesn't seem to reduce cardiovascular complications after acute stroke. A secondary analysis of a clinical trial in patients after ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke shows that giving IV magnesium does not reduce serious cardiac adverse events when compared with placebo (104393). Another secondary analysis of this trial shows that giving IV magnesium prior to arrival at the hospital and within 2 hours of a hemorrhagic stroke does not reduce hematoma volume on hospital arrival, hematoma expansion during hospital admission, or functional outcomes at 3 months (108733).
• Subarachnoid hemorrhage. Intravenous magnesium sulfate may reduce the risk of adverse outcomes in people with subarachnoid hemorrhage, but evidence is conflicting. Details: There is mixed evidence regarding the effect of magnesium sulfate in managing aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. One meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous magnesium sulfate 64-144 mmol/day for 10-18 days reduces the risk of poor outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, including death, vegetative state, or dependency, by 46% when compared with control (60932). Also, meta-analyses of clinical research show that intravenous magnesium reduces the risk of delayed cerebral ischemia by 27% when compared with placebo (60944,89398). However, these results were not confirmed in other meta-analyses (60973,90034).
• Thrombocytopenia. It is unclear if intravenous magnesium sulfate is beneficial in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Details: Addition of intravenous magnesium sulfate as a 6-gram loading dose followed by 6 grams infused over 24 hours for 3 days, to standard treatment for TTP does not reduce the time to normalization of the platelet count, the incidence of TTP-related organ dysfunction, or the recurrence rate, when compared with standard treatment alone (112777). This study may have been underpowered to detect a difference.
• Urinary incontinence. Although there has been interest in using oral magnesium for urinary incontinence, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of magnesium for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate magnesium for these uses.

(Read more about MAGNESIUM)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Dry mouth. Most clinical research shows that topical malic acid, used as either a mouth spray or a lozenge for up to 2 weeks, improves symptoms in patients with dry mouth from various causes. Details: A meta-analysis of five small clinical studies in patients with dry mouth from various causes shows that using a mouth spray containing malic acid 1%, with or without xylitol and fluoride, up to 8 times daily for 2 weeks improves dry mouth symptoms and increases salivary flow when compared with placebo or xylitol and fluoride alone (107916). Dry mouth in the evaluated patients was associated with antihypertensive therapy (92211), antidepressant therapy (92213), aging (95565), graft-versus-host disease (101174), and Sjogren syndrome (104778). Malic acid-containing products evaluated for dry mouth include Xeros Dentaid spray (92211,92213,95565), Xeros Dentaid tablets (104778), and SalivAktive (101174). Additionally, a small clinical study in patients with dry mouth due to type 2 diabetes shows that using malic acid 1% mouth spray on-demand for 2 weeks modestly increases salivary flow and improves patient-reported xerostomia scores at the 2-week follow-up, but not at the 1-month follow up, when compared with placebo (111743). Despite most studies showing consistent and positive results, one small clinical study in patients with idiopathic or drug-induced dry mouth failed to show significant improvement with Xeros Dentaid spray when compared with placebo. However, the malic acid spray performed similarly to betaine-based mouthwash and the study was likely underpowered to detect differences between groups (107917).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Topical malic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: An open-label, non-randomized clinical study in patients with mild-to-moderate acne shows that applying a specific cream (Hyseac AHA cream, Uriage) containing malic acid and arginine glycolate twice daily for 60 days, alone or in combination with prescribed pharmacological treatment, improves acne severity in about 64% of patients when compared to baseline. Pharmacological treatment consisted primarily of antibiotics, but also included retinoids and benzyl peroxide (92207). These findings are limited by the lack of a comparator group. Also, it is unclear if these findings are due to malic acid, arginine glycolate, or the combination.
• Actinic keratoses. Although there has been interest in using topical malic acid for actinic keratoses, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of malic acid for this purpose.
• Fatigue. Although there has been interest in using oral malic acid for fatigue, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of malic acid for this purpose.
• Fibromyalgia. Oral malic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with fibromyalgia shows that taking a specific product (Super Malic) containing malic acid 1200 mg and magnesium hydroxide 300 mg twice daily for 6 months reduces pain and tenderness when compared to baseline. However, taking malic acid 600 mg with magnesium hydroxide 150 mg twice daily for 1 month does not reduce pain and tenderness when compared with placebo (3262). The validity of the findings in the follow-on, open-label, 6-month phase of the study is limited by a lack of blinding and placebo control. Also, it is unclear if these findings are due to malic acid, magnesium, or the combination.
• Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Oral malic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with GERD shows that using a specific lozenge containing malic acid 25.58 mg, xylitol 422 mg, and fluoride 0.58 mg (Xeros Dentaid tablets, Dentaid) three times daily in combination with omeprazole 40 mg daily for 6 months may improve saliva buffering capacity and some symptoms of GERD when compared with omeprazole alone (104757). It is unclear if these findings are due to malic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Psoriasis. Although there has been interest in using topical malic acid for psoriasis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of malic acid for this purpose.
• Warts. Although there has been interest in using topical malic acid for warts, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of malic acid for this purpose.
• Wrinkled skin. Although there has been interest in using topical malic acid for wrinkled skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of malic acid for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate malic acid for these uses.

(Read more about MALIC ACID)

EFFECTIVE

• Manganese deficiency. Oral and intravenous manganese can prevent and treat manganese deficiency. Details: Taking manganese orally or intravenously is effective for preventing or treating manganese deficiency (15). However, the incidence of manganese deficiency is not well documented. Long-term home parenteral nutrition should provide no more than 55 mcg daily of manganese for adults or 1 mcg/kg daily (up to 50 mcg) of manganese for children unless clinically indicated (96416,99302). A clinical trial in children aged 8-14 months who are manganese deficient shows that taking manganese in addition to other vitamins and minerals in a 30 mL beverage six days per week for up to 14 months promotes growth when compared with placebo (19348).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if intranasal manganese is beneficial in patients with allergic rhinitis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chronic allergic rhinitis shows that using an isotonic seawater nasal spray enriched with manganese (Sterimar Mn, Laboratori Baldacci) four puffs daily for 5 months, in addition to standard treatment with oral antihistamines, nasal corticosteroids, and nasal decongestants, reduces the number of acute exacerbations by about three when compared with the standard treatment alone (99416). However, the effect of the manganese in this product is unclear since nasal lavage with a plain saline nasal spray also helps in allergic rhinitis.
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Intravenous manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients being treated for exacerbation of COPD shows that intravenous supplementation with manganese 0.4 mg, selenium 100 mcg, and zinc 2 mg daily may shorten the number of days spent on mechanical ventilation when compared with placebo (61432). It is unclear if these findings are due to manganese, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral intake of or environmental exposure to manganese decreases the risk of metabolic syndrome. Details: A meta-analysis of 12 observational studies suggests that increased dietary intake of manganese or higher levels of manganese in the serum, whole blood, or urine are not associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome when compared with lower manganese intake or laboratory values (112138).
• Obesity. Oral manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in overweight adults shows that taking a specific combination product (7-Keto Naturalean, Enzymatic Therapy, Inc.) containing manganese 500 mcg, 7-oxo-DHEA 100 mg, L-tyrosine 100 mg, asparagus root extract 100 mg, choline bitartrate 50 mg, inositol 50 mg, copper gluconate 500 mcg, and potassium iodide 100 mcg daily for 8 weeks reduces body weight by around 1.5 kg and body mass index (BMI) by around 0.7 kg/m² when compared with placebo (61581).
• Osteoarthritis. Oral manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Small clinical studies in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and lower back show that taking a specific combination product (Cosamin DS, Nutramax Laboratories) containing manganese ascorbate 228-304 mg (about 31-41 mg of elemental manganese), glucosamine hydrochloride 1500-2000 mg, and chondroitin sulfate 1200-1600 mg daily for 4 months improves pain and ability to do activities of daily living when compared with baseline or placebo (4237,7169). The amount of manganese in the Cosamin DS formulation used in this study is considerably higher than the 1 mg of elemental manganese per 1500 mg of glucosamine hydrochloride in the current formulation. Since numerous studies show glucosamine with chondroitin without manganese might be effective for osteoarthritis, it is not possible to draw conclusions about the effects of manganese alone.
• Osteoporosis. Oral manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in postmenopausal patients shows that taking manganese 5 mg in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg, zinc 15 mg, and copper 2.5 mg daily for 2 years reduces spinal bone loss when compared with placebo (1994). Another small clinical study in females with osteopenia shows that taking a specific combination product (Vitrum Osteomag, Unipharm Inc.) containing manganese 1.8 mg, calcium 600 mg, vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 200 IU, magnesium 40 mg, zinc 7.5 mg, copper 1 mg, and boron 250 mcg twice daily for one year improves bone mineral density when compared with no treatment (36840). However, since numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of calcium plus vitamin D for osteoporosis, it is not possible to draw conclusions about the effects of manganese alone.
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Oral manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with PMS shows that taking manganese 1.0 mg or 5.6 mg in combination with calcium 587 mg or 1336 mg daily for about 24 weeks improves symptoms of PMS including pain, crying, loneliness, anxiety, restlessness, irritability, mood swings, depression, and tension (2004).
• Wound healing. Topical manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Observational research has found that applying an alginate dressing containing manganese, calcium, and zinc to chronic wounds for 12 weeks is associated with improved wound healing when compared with previous treatments (61327). It is unclear if these findings are due to manganese, other ingredients, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate manganese for these uses.

(Read more about MANGANESE)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Molybdenum deficiency. Taking or consuming molybdenum can treat or prevent molybdenum deficiency (7135,16478). However, molybdenum deficiency is very rare.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Esophageal cancer. Population research suggests that low intake of molybdenum might be associated with an increased risk of esophageal cancer (16478,17205). However, it is not known if molybdenum supplements reduce the risk of developing esophageal cancer. More information is needed to rate molybdenum for this use.

(Read more about MOLYBDENUM)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Hypertension. Oral pomegranate juice seems to modestly reduce blood pressure. Details: Most clinical research evaluating pomegranate juice for reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) shows modest benefits (8310,13023,13691,69372,69373,69374). A meta-analysis of results from eight clinical studies including 574 patients shows that pomegranate juice reduces SBP by about 5 mmHg, but does not affect DBP, when compared with placebo. Doses of pomegranate juice ranged from 43-330 mL daily for 2 weeks to 18 months. Changes in SBP and DBP were not related to the dose or duration of pomegranate juice consumption (96247).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Diabetes. Most oral pomegranate products do not seem to be beneficial for diabetes. It is unclear if pomegranate seed powder is beneficial. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking pomegranate has no effect on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) or plasma levels of insulin, lipids, or fasting glucose when compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes. Various formulations, including juice, fruit extract, peel extract, and seed oil, were used in these studies (105265). However, a more recent clinical trial shows that drinking a beverage twice daily for 8 weeks, made by soaking a 'tea bag' containing pomegranate seed powder 5 grams in hot water for 10 minutes, modestly reduces levels of fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, and triglycerides when compared with placebo. Fasting blood glucose levels were reduced by approximately 4%, compared with a 6% increase in the placebo group (105270).
• Hyperlipidemia. Oral pomegranate does not seem to be beneficial for hyperlipidemia. Details: Most clinical research shows that taking pomegranate does not increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels or reduce total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or triglyceride levels when compared with placebo (13022,13023,13690,69142,69168,69276). A meta-analysis of results from 12 clinical studies including 545 patients with or without hyperlipidemia shows that taking pomegranate daily for at least 10 days and up to 1 year does not improve blood lipid levels when compared with placebo. Pomegranate formulations evaluated in these studies include juice, seed oil, whole fruit, extract, and vinegar beverage; no specific form or dose of pomegranate was associated with improvements in cholesterol or triglyceride levels (96248). One preliminary clinical study has evaluated pomegranate juice in combination with other fruits. Results from the study show that taking a specific pomegranate-containing combination product (Radical Fruits, Garden of Life) 900 mg orally three times daily before meals reduces total and LDL cholesterol and increases HDL cholesterol in males with hypercholesterolemia (69170). However, it is unclear if these benefits are due to pomegranate, other ingredients, or the combination.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral pomegranate juice is beneficial for preventing atherosclerosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that drinking pomegranate juice 50 mL daily reduces intima-media thickness of the carotid artery by up to 35% after one year when compared to baseline in patients with atherosclerosis and carotid artery stenosis (13023).
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral pomegranate extract is beneficial for athletic performance. Details: Preliminary clinical research in trained male cyclists shows that taking pomegranate extract (POM Wonderful LLC) 15 mg/kg daily for 8 days moderately reduces the amount of oxygen needed to perform submaximal exercise when compared with placebo. However, pomegranate extract does not improve performance in a timed trial (99100). Other preliminary clinical research in regionally competitive male cyclists shows that taking pomegranate extract (Pomanox P30, Euromed S.A.) 750 mg daily for 15 days increases the time to exhaustion by 94 seconds after a prolonged submaximal effort, as well as the time to reach the anaerobic threshold by about 55 seconds, when compared with placebo. There was no effect on the restoration of force or on oxygen consumption (101881).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral pomegranate juice is beneficial for COPD. Details: A small clinical trial shows that drinking pomegranate juice 400 mL daily for 5 weeks does not improve symptoms or respiratory function in patients with COPD when compared with placebo (13692).
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). It is unclear if oral pomegranate juice is beneficial for patients with CHD. Details: Some preliminary clinical research shows that drinking pomegranate juice (POM Wonderful Pomegranate Juice, POM Wonderful LLC) 240 mL daily for 3 months decreases stress-induced myocardial ischemia in patients with CHD. The average improvement in myocardial perfusion was about 17% with pomegranate juice, compared with an 18% worsening of myocardial perfusion in patients taking placebo (13691). However, other preliminary clinical research in patients with moderate CHD risk shows that drinking the same pomegranate juice product 240 mL daily for 18 months does not improve carotid intima-media thickness when compared to control (17329). It is not known if drinking pomegranate juice can prevent or reduce the risk of a myocardial infarction or other cardiovascular outcomes.
• Dental plaque. It is unclear if rinsing the mouth with pomegranate extract is beneficial for reducing dental plaque. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that rinsing with pomegranate extract mouthwash for one minute once or twice daily reduces dental plaque in patients with or without fixed orthodontic appliances. The antiplaque activity of pomegranate extract is similar to that of chlorhexidine (69171,69316).
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). It is unclear if oral pomegranate juice is beneficial for ED. Details: In patients with mild-to-moderate ED, preliminary clinical research shows that drinking pomegranate juice daily for 4 weeks does not improve symptoms of ED when compared with placebo (69175).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral pomegranate juice is beneficial for reducing exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that drinking pomegranate juice (POM Wonderful Pomegranate Juice, POM Wonderful LLC) 250 mL twice daily for 15 days reduces post-exercise muscle soreness in elbow flexor, but not knee extensor, muscles in resistance-rained males when compared with placebo (69355). However, in non-resistance trained males, drinking the same pomegranate juice 250 mL twice daily for 9 days does not reduce exercise-induced muscle damage or delayed onset soreness of elbow flexor muscles when compared with placebo (101880).
• HIV/AIDS. Although there has been interest in using oral pomegranate for HIV/AIDS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pomegranate for this condition.
• Influenza. Although there has been interest in using oral pomegranate for influenza prevention, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pomegranate for this purpose.
• Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). It is unclear if oral pomegranate juice is beneficial for preventing brain injury in IUGR neonates. Details: In patients with an IUGR pregnancy, clinical research shows that drinking pomegranate juice 8 ounces daily from 24-34 weeks' gestation until delivery reduces the risk of an MRI-diagnosed gray matter brain injury in the infant by approximately 28%. There was no effect on brain volume or white matter injury (105267).
• Kidney failure. It is unclear if oral pomegranate juice is beneficial for patients on hemodialysis; the available research is conflicting. Details: Some preliminary clinical research shows that taking pomegranate juice (Nutrafood) 100 mL during the first dialysis treatment hour three times weekly for one year reduces antihypertensive medication requirements and the rate of second hospitalization due to infection when compared with placebo. Consuming pomegranate juice also increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in patients with baseline levels of 40 mg/dL or less and reduces triglycerides in patients with baseline levels of at least 200 mg/dL (91698,91699). Preliminary clinical research also shows that taking pomegranate juice 100 mL immediately after dialysis three times weekly for 8 weeks reduces triglycerides by approximately 20%, as well as systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 5% and 7%, respectively, when compared with baseline. HDL cholesterol was also increased by approximately 23%. These changes were significant when compared with placebo (101882). However, pomegranate juice did not affect total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, liver enzymes, or incidence of cardiovascular events when compared with placebo (91698,91699,101882). Other preliminary clinical research shows that drinking pomegranate juice (POM Wonderful Pomegranate Juice, POM Wonderful LLC) 100 mL or taking pomegranate juice extract tablets (POM Wonderful LLC) 1050 mg daily prior to each dialysis session for 4 weeks does not improve blood pressure, lipids, or markers of inflammation and oxidative stress when compared to baseline in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (91697). Although the reason for these conflicting findings is not clear, it may have to do with the timing of consumption. The evidence suggests that offering pomegranate during dialysis or after completion of dialysis might be more effective than prior to dialysis.
• Menopausal symptoms. It is unclear if oral pomegranate seed oil or pomegranate extract is beneficial for menopausal symptoms. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific pomegranate seed oil (Delima, Pekana Naturheilmittel GmbH) 30 mg orally twice daily for 12 weeks does not reduce the frequency of hot flashes when compared with placebo in postmenopausal adults experiencing at least 5 hot flashes per day. However, pomegranate seed oil might improve sleep in some patients with sleep disturbances attributed to menopause (91685). A clinical study in healthy, perimenopausal and menopausal adults with untreated menopausal symptoms shows that taking pomegranate extract 3 mL three times daily for 4 weeks reduces symptoms, including hot flashes and vertigo, and improves physical and mental quality of life when compared with placebo. Additionally, these improvements were sustained 3 weeks after discontinuing treatment (108484). The validity of this study is limited by the short duration of treatment.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral pomegranate juice is beneficial for metabolic syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that drinking pomegranate juice 240 mL daily for one month improves endothelial dysfunction in adolescents with metabolic syndrome when compared with drinking grape juice 240 mL daily (53174,69362).
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral pomegranate juice is beneficial for increasing muscle strength. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific pomegranate extract (POMx, POM Wonderful LLC) 480 mL twice daily modestly improves recovery of strength 2-3 days after eccentric exercise but does not reduce muscle soreness after exercise when compared with placebo (69261).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral pomegranate seed oil or pomegranate extract improves anthropometric measures in adults with NAFLD. Details: A small clinical study in overweight and obese adults with NAFLD shows that taking a dried pomegranate extract, standardized to contain 90 mg of ellagic acid, twice daily for 12 weeks reduces body mass index and body weight when compared with placebo. A 5 kg weight reduction occurred in the pomegranate group, compared to a small increase in weight in the placebo group. Pomegranate also improved diastolic blood pressure, as well as lipid and glycemic parameters; however, the patients included in this study had normal baseline parameters, limiting the validity of this finding (108481). Pomegranate has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. One small clinical crossover study in obese females with NAFLD shows that taking a specific combination product (Xanthigen, Polinat) containing pomegranate seed oil 300 mg and brown marine algae 300 mg (standardized to fucoxanthin 2.4 mg) modestly reduces body weight and liver fat content when compared with placebo (69257).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral pomegranate is beneficial for obesity. Most evidence suggests that it is not beneficial, although some studies have yielded conflicting findings. Details: A meta-analysis of 513 participants shows that taking pomegranate extract, juice, or concentrate for 2-26 weeks does not reduce body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, or body fat percentage when compared with placebo or other control (101883). However, most of these studies were not designed to investigate weight as the primary outcome, and some preliminary clinical research in overweight or obese individuals suggests that some pomegranate products might have some benefit. Drinking pomegranate juice 120 mL daily for one month helps these individuals maintain weight when compared with placebo, although it does not appear to improve glucose, insulin secretion, or insulin sensitivity (91693).
• Oropharyngeal candidiasis. It is unclear if topical pomegranate peel extract is beneficial for oropharyngeal candidiasis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with candidiasis associated with denture stomatitis shows that applying a gel containing the extract of pomegranate fruit peel to the gums three times daily for 15 days seems to be as effective as miconazole gel for improving symptoms of candidiasis (13689).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral pomegranate juice is beneficial for PCOS. Details: In patients with PCOS, preliminary clinical research shows that taking pomegranate juice 45 mL daily for 8 weeks reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressures by 10 and 4 mmHg, respectively, when compared with a control group not taking pomegranate juice. Triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were also modestly improved. However, there was no effect on glycemic measures, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels increased by 6 mg/dL (105266). Another clinical trial in patients with PCOS shows that taking synbiotic pomegranate juice containing inulin and lactobacillus as 2 liters weekly for 8 weeks improves insulin sensitivity, body mass index, waist circumference, and testosterone levels when compared with baseline or a control juice. However, patients consuming a drink containing only the synbiotic ingredients experienced the same improvements, whereas patients consuming only regular pomegranate juice experienced no benefits, suggesting that pomegranate was not responsible for these changes (101884).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral pomegranate extract or juice is beneficial for prostate cancer. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that pomegranate might slow prostate cancer progression in some patients after surgery or radiation for prostate cancer. The length of time to doubling of prostate specific antigen (PSA) was longer in those who took a specific pomegranate extract (POMx, POM Wonderful LLC) 1-3 grams daily, as well as those who drank 8 ounces of pomegranate juice daily, for up to 24 months (14137,14388,91695). However, the results from a large well-designed study do not support these findings. This study shows that taking 8 ounces of a pomegranate liquid extract does not increase the length of time to doubling of PSA (105271). In patients with favorable-risk localized prostate cancer, a small clinical trial also shows that taking pomegranate fruit extract (POMx, POM Wonderful) 1000 mg daily for 12 months does not affect the length of time to doubling of PSA, although there were some changes in tumor markers of DNA damage (105269). Pomegranate has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. Preliminary clinical research in patients with localized prostate cancer shows that taking a combination supplement containing pomegranate powder 100 mg, broccoli powder 100 mg, turmeric powder 100 mg, and green tea extract 20 mg daily for 6 months slows the increase in PSA levels when compared with placebo (89730). It is not clear if this effect is due to pomegranate, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if oral pomegranate extract is beneficial for RA. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific pomegranate extract (POMx, POM Wonderful LLC) 5 mL twice daily for 12 weeks decreases disease activity and reduces tender joint count by 62% when compared to baseline in patients with RA (91686). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Rhinosinusitis. It is unclear if intranasal pomegranate extract is beneficial for chronic rhinosinusitis. Details: A clinical study in adults with chronic rhinosinusitis or rhinitis persisting longer than 12 weeks, with or without the presence of nasal polyps, shows that using a nasal spray containing pomegranate extract in an unknown dose twice daily for 30 days does not improve objective or subjective nasal or sinus symptoms when compared with placebo nasal spray. In a subgroup of patients with chronic rhinitis, including allergic and nonallergic rhinitis, improvement in thick nasal discharge is also observed in those receiving the pomegranate nasal spray; however, the study does not report outcomes for each subtype of rhinitis (108480).
• Stroke. Although there has been interest in using oral pomegranate for stroke recovery, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pomegranate for this purpose.
• Sunburn. It is unclear if oral pomegranate extract is beneficial for sunburn prevention. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking pomegranate extract standardized to contain ellagic acid 100-200 mg daily for 4 weeks does not reduce skin pigmentation caused by UV light exposure when compared with placebo (69172). However, this study was not adequately powered to detect a difference between treatments.
• Trichomoniasis. It is unclear if oral pomegranate extract is beneficial for trichomoniasis. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with vaginal Trichomoniasis suggests that taking pomegranate extract might help to eradicate Trichomonas vaginalis infection (69286). The validity of this finding is limited by the small study size, unclear reporting, and lack of a control group. More evidence is needed to rate pomegranate for these uses.

(Read more about POMEGRANATE)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Selenium deficiency. Oral selenium is effective for the treatment and prevention of selenium deficiency. Details: Selenium supplementation is effective for reversing symptoms of selenium deficiency, as well as for preventing the development of selenium deficiency (4844,90357).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Autoimmune thyroiditis. Oral selenium seems to improve autoimmune thyroiditis in adults but not in children. Details: Clinical research in adults with thyroiditis shows that taking selenium up to 200 mcg daily in combination with levothyroxine reduces thyroid peroxidase antibodies by about 6% to 30% more than placebo after 3-12 months of treatment (9797,17510,17511,17512,17513,17515,17516,97943,104424). Selenium also seems to improve measures of quality of life such as feelings of well-being and mood (17515). Doses under 200 mcg daily might not be as effective (17512); selenomethionine might be more effective than sodium selenite (97943). Some research shows that selenium might be more effective in patients with more severe disease activity and less effective in patients with only moderate disease activity (9797,17513,17515). Also, selenium might not reduce thyroid autoantibodies in patients newly diagnosed with thyroiditis not receiving concurrent levothyroxine (97943). There is no reliable evidence about the effect of selenium on thyroid function or thyroid morphology. Despite positive findings in adults, clinical research in children suggests that taking selenium 50-200 mcg daily for 3-12 months does not significantly improve thyroid peroxidase antibodies, thyroglobulin antibody, or thyroid echogenicity (17514,90362).
• Kashin-Beck disease. Selenium seems to help prevent Kashin-Beck disease, but does not improve symptoms in patients with existing disease. Details: A meta-analysis of prospective studies conducted in China shows that adding salt enriched with selenium to the diet of healthy children for up to 4 years reduces the odds of developing Kashin-Beck disease by 84% when compared with the use of iodine salt. Additionally, in children with Kashin-Beck disease, adding salt enriched with selenium to the diet might help heal metaphyseal lesions (97945). However, selenium does not seem to improve symptoms in those with existing disease. A clinical trial in children with Kashin-Beck disease shows that selenium supplementation does not improve joint pain or mobility when compared with placebo (55941).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral selenium might reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia in pregnant patients. Details: A meta-analysis of three low-quality clinical trials in pregnant patients shows that taking selenium 60-100 mcg daily for up to 6 months reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia by 72% when compared with placebo. Additionally, a meta-analysis of population research has found that the risk of pre-eclampsia is higher in pregnant patients with low selenium levels. Selenium levels were about 6.5 mcg/L lower in those who developed pre-eclampsia compared with those who did not (97946).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Asthma. Oral selenium does not seem to improve asthma symptoms. Details: Epidemiological research has found that plasma selenium concentration is not associated with asthma (74422). Also, clinical research in patients with asthma shows that taking selenium 100 mcg daily for 14-24 weeks does not improve symptoms, lung function, use of rescue inhalers, or quality of life when compared with placebo (74490,74387).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Oral selenium-enriched yeast does not seem to improve eczema symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients with eczema shows that taking selenium-enriched yeast 600 mcg daily for 12 weeks, either alone or in combination with vitamin E 600 IU daily, does not improve symptom severity when compared with placebo (74456).
• Bladder cancer. Despite promising initial research, oral selenium does not seem to prevent bladder cancer development or recurrence. Details: In 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding selenium and bladder cancer risk based on two small studies. However, the FDA determined that it is highly uncertain that selenium supplements reduce the risk of bladder cancer (102373). Since that time, the available research has not confirmed an association between selenium and bladder cancer risk. Epidemiological research has found that selenium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of bladder cancer (97085). Furthermore, a clinical study shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily with or without vitamin E 400 IU daily for about 7 years does not prevent bladder cancer in older men (90352). Selenium also does not seem to prevent bladder cancer recurrence. A clinical study shows that taking selenium yeast 200 mcg daily for 3 years does not prevent the recurrence of bladder cancer when compared with placebo in patients that had undergone a transurethral resection for non-invasive bladder cancer (97087).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Most research shows that oral selenium does not reduce the risk of CVD. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical trials in patients with and without risk factors for CVD show that taking selenium alone or with other supplements for up to 8 years does not reduce the risk of CVD mortality or fatal and non-fatal CVD events (90360,97078). When reported, patients in these studies all had adequate plasma selenium levels at baseline (90360).
• Colorectal cancer. Oral selenium does not seem to prevent cancer of the colon and rectum. Details: Epidemiological research has found no association between serum concentrations of selenium and the risk of developing colorectal cancer (74321,97085). Also, meta-analyses of clinical research, as well as individual clinical trials, show that taking selenium 100-200 mcg daily, alone or in combination with other vitamins and minerals, does not reduce the risk of colorectal cancer when compared with control (16707,34676,90361,97092).
• Diabetes. Increased intake of selenium, either in the diet or as a supplement, is associated with an increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes. It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial in patients with type 2 diabetes. Details: Observational research has found that high serum selenium levels, high dietary selenium intake, and selenium supplementation are each linked to an increased risk of developing diabetes (97091,99661). Consuming more than the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) of selenium daily is associated with an increased risk of developing diabetes when compared with consuming less than the RDA (99661). However, the effect of short-term selenium supplementation in patients with diabetes is unclear. Three small clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes and various other conditions, such as cardiovascular disease or kidney failure, show that taking selenium (Nature Made) 200 mcg daily for 8-24 weeks does not improve fasting blood glucose. However, taking selenium seems to reduce insulin resistance and improve insulin sensitivity and levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol when compared with placebo (97084,97086,109092). These three studies were included in a meta-analysis of 10 small, mostly moderate-quality clinical studies. This analysis shows that taking selenium 100-200 mcg daily for 4 to 24 weeks improves markers of insulin resistance and reduces serum insulin levels but does not lower fasting blood glucose when compared with placebo. Selenium supplementation did not reduce total or LDL cholesterol or triglycerides but may improve HDL cholesterol (110593). However, the validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies, which enrolled patients with diabetes, gestational diabetes, cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or obesity. Additionally, all studies were conducted in Iran; it is unclear if these findings are generalizable to populations in other geographic locations.
• Dyslipidemia. Most research shows that oral selenium supplementation does not improve cholesterol levels. Details: A meta-analysis of 11 clinical studies in adults with dyslipidemia shows that taking selenium 50-300 mcg daily for 8-24 weeks does not increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels or decrease total or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels when compared with placebo. Taking selenium might modestly improve triglyceride levels, but this improvement is unlikely to be considered clinically significant (99662). Another meta-analysis of 21 mostly small, low-quality clinical studies, some of which were included in the prior meta-analysis, shows that taking various forms of selenium may modestly decrease total cholesterol levels, but does not improve triglycerides, LDL, or HDL cholesterol when compared with placebo (110595). However, the validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies, which assessed various selenium dosing regimens and enrolled healthy patients or those with various cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular conditions.
• Low birth weight. Oral or intravenous selenium supplementation does not improve outcomes in low birth weight infants. Details: Low selenium levels have been documented in low birth weight infants. However, selenium supplementation, orally or intravenously, does not appear to improve most outcomes in low birth weight infants. Clinical research shows that administering selenium, either as 7-10 mcg/kg daily parenterally or 5 mcg/kg daily orally, does not improve oxygen dependency or reduce the risk of death in low birth weight infants when compared with placebo. However, supplementation decreases the incidence of sepsis by up to 33% (74288,97083).
• Lung cancer. Oral selenium does not reduce lung cancer risk in most patients. Details: A meta-analysis of three large clinical trials of over 20,000 patients, including patients with resected stage I non-small-cell lung cancer, shows that taking selenium 200-400 mcg daily for up to 5 years does not reduce the risk of lung cancer when compared with control (92912,97092). A secondary analysis of one of these studies found that selenium supplementation might reduce lung cancer risk in people with selenium levels below 105 ng/mL (9798). Also, a large study in healthy Chinese patients shows no benefit of using selenium in combination with other nutrients for over 5 years when compared with control (34539).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. Oral selenium does not reduce the risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer and has been linked to increased risk in some patients. Details: Epidemiological research has found that higher selenium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer (97085). Furthermore, clinical research shows that taking selenium orally 200 mcg daily does not reduce the risk of basal cell carcinoma when compared with control (2664,10687). In addition, some evidence shows that daily selenium supplementation might increase the risk of squamous cell carcinoma and total non-melanoma skin cancer (10687).
• Prostate cancer. Oral selenium does not seem to reduce prostate cancer risk. Details: Population studies have found that higher serum or toenail selenium levels are associated with a decreased risk of prostate cancer (8734,8735,8736,92911,10263). However, clinical research does not support this finding. A meta-analysis of 5 large clinical trials of over 20,000 patients shows that selenium 200-400 mcg daily for up to 5 years does not reduce the risk of prostate cancer when compared with control (97092). A 7-14 year follow-up study of one of these trials shows there was still no reduction of prostate cancer risk (17688). Selenium has also shown no benefit when used in combination with other supplements. In a large-scale clinical study (SU.VI.MAX), taking selenium 100 mcg in combination with vitamin C, vitamin E, beta-carotene, and zinc did not reduce prostate cancer risk (14135). In 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding selenium and prostate cancer risk, stating that it is highly unlikely that selenium supplements reduce the risk of prostate cancer (102373).
• Psoriasis. Oral selenium does not seem to reduce psoriasis severity. Details: Clinical research shows that taking selenium-enriched yeast 600 mcg daily for 12 weeks, either alone or in combination with vitamin E 600 IU daily, does not reduce the severity of psoriasis when compared with placebo (74460).
• Sepsis. Intravenous selenium does not appear to improve outcomes in septic adults. Details: Earlier meta-analyses of clinical trials in septic adults showed that parenteral administration of selenium, along with routine nutritional interventions, reduces the risk of mortality by 11% to 27% when compared with placebo (90347,92907,92910). However, a more recent meta-analysis, which includes a large, multi-center study of over 1000 cases, shows that parenteral selenium does not reduce mortality in septic adults at 28, 90, or 180 days when compared with placebo (99658). Enteral selenium with other nutrients has been studied for sepsis in children. Clinical research in children shows that taking enteral selenium 40-400 mcg daily with zinc, glutamine, and IV metoclopramide is no more effective than whey protein for reducing time to first episode of nosocomial infection or sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the selenium combination treatment might reduce the risk for sepsis in immunocompromised pediatric patients (86095).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral selenium reduces the risk of cognitive decline in older adults. Details: A cross-sectional study in elderly Americans has found that lower blood levels of selenium are associated with a greater risk of poor cognitive scores when compared with higher levels (104426).
• Alcohol-related liver disease. Although there is interest in using oral selenium for alcohol-related liver disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of selenium for this condition.
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there is interest in using oral selenium for allergic rhinitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of selenium for this condition.
• Arsenic poisoning. It is unclear if oral selenized yeast is beneficial for patients that were exposed to high levels of arsenic in the environment. Details: A small clinical study in Chinese people environmentally exposed to high concentrations of arsenic shows that taking selenized yeast providing 100-200 mcg of selenium daily for 14 months decreases the concentration of arsenic and symptoms of toxicity when compared with placebo (7831).
• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in men with BPH shows that taking selenium 240 mcg plus silymarin 570 mg daily for 6 months reduces lower urinary tract symptoms when compared with placebo (88155). Another clinical study in men with BPH shows that taking tamsulosin 0.4 mg plus a specific product containing selenium, saw palmetto, and lycopene (Profluss, Ayanda AS) daily for one year improves lower urinary tract symptoms and urodynamic parameters when compared with tamsulosin-alone (90354). It is unclear if these effects are due to selenium, other ingredients, or the combinations.
• Burns. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Small clinical studies in patients with burns on 46% of their body surface suggest that taking a combination of copper 2.5-3.1 mg, selenium 315-380 mcg, and zinc 26.2-31.4 mg daily reduces the incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia, but does not seem to improve wound healing, hospital stay, or mortality, when compared with placebo (6520,74382). Another very small clinical study in burn patients suggests that taking copper 4.5 mg, selenium 190 mcg, and zinc 40 mg daily reduces the duration of hospitalization, but does not have an effect on recovery and wound treatment requirements, when compared with standard dietary doses of these nutrients (74485).
• Cancer. Selenium does not seem to reduce the risk of cancer in most people, but it might be beneficial in those with low selenium levels and in men. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research and several clinical studies show that selenium supplementation does not reduce the incidence of cancer or cancer-related mortality when compared with control (14109,34538,74414,97078,97092). In clinical studies, selenium 100-400 mcg taken daily for 2-7.5 years with or without additional antioxidants did not reduce overall cancer risk (14109,34538,74414). However, most evidence did not assess baseline selenium levels. Other evidence suggests that selenium may have a benefit in men and in people with lower selenium levels. Epidemiological research has found that selenium intake at the recommended daily allowance (RDA) of 55 mcg or higher is associated with decreased cancer incidence and cancer mortality, especially in men (97085,103164). However, this research suggests that cancer risk was also influenced by age, body mass index, and smoking status (103164). Some clinical research also suggests that taking selenium might decrease the risk of cancer, when only men are considered (14109). An older meta-analysis of clinical research suggests that selenium was particularly beneficial in patients with lower baseline levels of selenium and in patients at high risk for cancer (90350). In 2003, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that consumption of selenium may produce anticarcinogenic effects and reduce the risk for certain forms of cancer. However, the FDA has determined that the evidence is limited and inconclusive (102374).
• Cataracts. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: An ancillary clinical study shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily with or without vitamin E 400 IU daily for around 5.6 years does not reduce the risk of age-related cataracts in men when compared with placebo (92902).
• Cervical dysplasia. It is unclear if oral selenized yeast is beneficial for patients with cervical dysplasia of mild severity. Details: A small clinical study in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1) shows that taking yeast containing selenium 200 mcg daily for 6 months resulted in regression of CIN1 in 88% of participants, compared with regression in only 55% of participants taking placebo (97944).
• Chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in cancer patients shows that drinking a beverage containing vitamin C, vitamin E, and selenium does not prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity when compared with a placebo beverage (74340). However, poor compliance to treatment may limit the validity of these findings.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there is interest in using oral selenium for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of selenium for this condition.
• Cirrhosis. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis shows that taking a combination of selenium, vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E, methionine, and coenzyme Q10 for 12 weeks does not improve fatigue or any other disease-related symptoms when compared with placebo (34494).
• Cisplatin-associated ototoxicity. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in cancer patients shows that drinking a beverage containing vitamin C, vitamin E, and selenium does not prevent cisplatin-associated hearing loss when compared with placebo beverage (74340). However, poor compliance to treatment may limit the validity of these findings.
• Colorectal adenoma. It is unclear if oral selenium prevents recurrence of adenomas in the colon and rectum. Details: A large clinical study in patients with a history of colorectal adenomas shows that taking a specific selenium supplement (SelenoExcell High Selenium Yeast, Cypress Systems) 200 mcg daily for about 33 months does not reduce adenoma recurrence when compared with placebo. However, in a sub-group of patients with advanced adenomas at baseline, selenium seems to reduce risk of recurrence by 18% when compared with placebo (97091). Some research also shows that taking selenium in combination with zinc, and vitamins A, C, and E reduces adenoma recurrence when compared with placebo (92903). It is not clear any benefit is due to selenium, other nutrients, or the combination.
• Congestive heart failure (CHF). Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in elderly patients with heart failure living in Sweden shows that taking a specific selenium supplement (SelenoPrecise, Pharma Nord) 200 mcg plus a specific coenzyme Q10 supplement (Bio-Quinon, Pharma Nord) 200 mg daily for about 4 years reduces the risk of cardiovascular mortality by about 55% when compared with placebo (92904). The risk reduction seems to be most pronounced in patients with lower selenium levels (97906). Furthermore, at 10- and 12-year follow-ups, cardiovascular mortality in the treatment group continued to be 49% and 41% lower, respectively, when compared with placebo (96546,97466). It is unclear if the benefit can be attributed to selenium, coenzyme Q10, or the combination.
• Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. It is unclear if oral selenized yeast is beneficial for patients undergoing CABG surgery. Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing CABG surgery shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily as selenium yeast for 4 weeks improves glycemic control, lipid levels, and markers of inflammation when compared with placebo (103163). It is not known whether this influences the outcome or complications of CABG surgery.
• Critical illness (trauma). Evidence on the use of intravenous selenium in critically ill patients is conflicting. Details: The most recent meta-analysis of 24 clinical trials in critically ill patients shows that intravenous selenium does not improve survival over 6 months, shorten hospital stay, or reduce intensive care unit (ICU) stay, infectious complications, development of acute kidney failure, or duration of mechanical ventilation when compared with control. Also, length of ICU stay was increased by about 4.5-fold in patients receiving selenium in doses of more than 1000 mcg daily (109086). These findings are similar to those of a meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials in critically ill patients from 2016 which shows that intravenous selenium given alone or with other nutrients does not improve mortality, duration of hospital stay, or kidney function when compared with control (97090). However, another recent meta-analysis of 19 clinical trials in critically ill patients shows that intravenous selenium reduces total mortality by 14% and shortens hospital stay by about 2 days when compared with control, without affecting ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, or mortality over 28 days (101345). The reasons for these discrepancies are not clear and do not seem to be completely explained by differences in doses or durations of selenium (109086). Some reasons for the discrepancies might include differing analytic methods used in meta-analyses, as well as variations in forms of selenium, concomitant treatments, and specific patient populations. One sub-analysis shows that, when limited to randomized controlled trials examining the effect of selenium supplementation in patients sustaining traumatic injury, the odds of mortality was reduced by about 26% and duration of ICU and hospital stay were modestly reduced. There was no effect on infectious complications (109090).
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral selenium prevents dementia or reduces symptoms. Details: Observational research has found that taking selenium 200 mcg daily for 4 years does not decrease the incidence of dementia in men 60 years or older (93570). However, the follow-up period may not have been long enough to reliably detect the effect of selenium on the development of dementia. Also, the screening method used to detect new cases of dementia may have failed to identify individuals presenting with only the initial symptomatic stages of the disease (93570,93571).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial for the treatment of prevention of depression. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found no difference in serum levels of selenium between patients with or without depression. In addition, serum levels of selenium do not correlate with depression scores (109091). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that selenium supplementation, usually 100-200 mcg daily, modestly reduces symptoms of depression; however, at least one of the three studies included in this meta-analysis investigated the effects of selenium in patients with postpartum depression, specifically (109091). These meta-analyses are limited by the quality of included research and the small number of available studies.
• Diabetic nephropathy. It is unclear if oral selenium alleviates diabetic nephropathy symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients with diabetic nephropathy shows that taking selenium (Nature Made) 200 mcg daily for 12 weeks does not improve kidney markers such as blood urea nitrogen or serum creatinine when compared with placebo (97084).
• Dilated cardiomyopathy. There is limited evidence on the oral use of selenium in patients with Keshan disease and peripartum cardiomyopathy. Details: Observational research in patients with a specific type of dilated cardiomyopathy called Keshan disease and congestive heart failure has found that selenium supplementation is associated with a 61% decreased risk of cardiac death when compared with no supplementation (101346). A small clinical study in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy and selenium deficiency shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily for 3 months does not seem to improve heart failure symptoms or left ventricle systolic function, or prevent death, when compared with no treatment (104420).
• Esophageal cancer. Limited research suggests that oral selenium does not reduce esophageal cancer risk. Details: Low quality clinical research suggests that taking selenium supplements alone or with other vitamins does not decrease the risk of esophageal cancer when compared with control (4679,12185).
• Gastric cancer. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients and in a specific patient population; its effect when used alone and in other populations is unclear. Details: Population research in Chinese patients has found that high levels of selenium are associated with lower risk of gastric cancer and cancer mortality (97948). However, clinical research does not agree. A large clinical study in patients residing in China shows that taking selenium 37.5 mcg in combination with vitamin C 250 mg and vitamin E 100 IU twice daily for about 7.3 years does not reduce the risk of developing gastric cancer or precancerous gastric lesions when compared with placebo. This combination treatment was not associated with reduced gastric cancer incidence or mortality at the 14-year follow-up of this study (14447,51470). Another clinical study in healthy Chinese adults also shows that taking a combination of selenium 50 mcg, vitamin E 30 mg, and beta-carotene 15 mg daily for 5.2 years does not reduce the risk of gastric cancer when compared with control (4679). It is unclear if these findings are generalizable to populations in geographic locations other than China.
• Graves' ophthalmopathy. It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial for Graves' ophthalmopathy. Details: A small clinical trial in adults with Graves' ophthalmopathy shows that taking selenium 100 mcg twice daily for 6 months is modestly beneficial for reducing disease activity, based on signs and symptoms including pain, swelling, and redness, when compared with placebo (109085).
• Hepatitis C. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with hepatitis C shows that taking a combination of selenium 200 mcg, vitamin C 500 mcg, and vitamin E 945 IU daily for 6 months does not have an effect on levels of alanine aminotransferase or viral load when compared with placebo (74377).
• HIV/AIDS. It is unclear if oral selenium improves outcomes in patients with HIV. Details: Clinical trials in HIV-positive men and women, most receiving anti-retroviral therapy (ART), shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily for up to 2 years can reduce HIV-1 viral load, increase CD4 cell counts, and lower the risk of hospitalizations when compared with placebo (15266,74314). However, not all research agrees. Two small clinical trials in HIV-positive patients taking ART shows that taking selenium 100-200 mcg daily for 6-12 months does not reduce the risk for opportunistic infections and does not increase CD4 counts when compared with control (7830,104417). Furthermore, selenium does not seem to benefit patients that are not receiving conventional ART. A large clinical study in HIV-infected pregnant patients in Tanzania with poor access to ART shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily with prenatal vitamins until 6 months after delivery, does not improve progression of HIV nor pregnancy outcomes when compared with no selenium supplementation (74419). Another large clinical study in HIV-infected and ART-naïve patients in Botswana shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily for 24 months does not slow HIV progression when compared with placebo (92905).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral selenium improves blood pressure. Some evidence suggests selenium supplementation may slightly increase systolic blood pressure. Details: A meta-analysis of 5 small clinical studies in adults with various health conditions shows that taking selenium or selenium yeast 100-200 mcg/day for 6-12 weeks may increase systolic blood pressure by about 2 mmHg but does not impact diastolic blood pressure when compared with placebo (110595). However, the validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies, which enrolled patients with preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, obesity, or heart failure. Additionally, all studies were conducted in Iran; it is unclear if these findings are generalizable to populations in other geographic locations.
• Hyperthyroidism. It is unclear if oral selenium alleviates symptoms in patients with Graves' disease. Details: A small clinical study in patients with Graves' hyperthyroidism shows that taking sodium selenite 300 mcg daily in addition to treatment with methimazole for 24 weeks does not affect symptoms or recurrence rates when compared with placebo plus methimazole (97089). Oral selenium has also been studied in combination with other supplements. A small preliminary clinical trial in patients with newly diagnosed Graves' disease and low levels of selenium and vitamin D shows that taking selenium 100 mcg daily for 180 days along with vitamin D as cholecalciferol 7000 IU weekly for 270 days, in addition to methimazole, modestly reduces levels of serum free thyroxine and improves quality of life when compared with methimazole alone. However, taking selenium and vitamin D did not affect levels of free triiodothyronine or positive thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor antibody (109049).
• Hypothyroidism. It is unclear if oral selenium improves thyroid hormone balance in elderly individuals, pregnant patients, or patients with subclinical hypothyroidism. In patients with iodine deficiency, selenium supplementation may be harmful. Details: Low selenium levels or selenium deficiency seems to reduce conversion of thyroxine (T4) to triiodothyronine (T3). However, clinical research in healthy elderly patients is conflicting. Although one study shows that taking selenium 100 mcg daily for 3 months increases conversion of T4 to T3 when compared with placebo (17508), a larger study shows that taking selenium 100-300 mcg daily for 6 months does not impact conversion of T4 to T3 when compared with placebo (17509). Additionally, taking selenium can worsen hypothyroidism in people with iodine deficiency. People who are iodine- and selenium-deficient should not receive selenium supplements without concomitant iodine. In these individuals, selenium increases conversion of T4 to T3, but the thyroid gland lacks iodine to synthesize more T4 (1664,14563,14564,14565,17508). Selenium does not have a significant effect on thyroid function when iodine intake is adequate (1664,4844). In pregnant patients with hypothyroidism, clinical research shows that taking selenium does not reduce complications such as pre-eclampsia or preterm birth. However, selenium might improve postpartum thyroid function and decrease the risk of postpartum thyroiditis (17507). Also, taking selenium 200 mcg daily during pregnancy seems to reduce the risk of developing postpartum thyroid dysfunction and permanent hypothyroidism by 41% and 42%, respectively, when compared with placebo in euthyroid pregnant patients who are positive for thyroid peroxidase antibodies (74391). Selenium supplementation has also been studied for subclinical hypothyroidism. Clinical research in females aged 18 to 50 years with or at risk for subclinical hypothyroidism in Slovakia shows that taking selenium 83 mcg daily and myo-inositol 600 mg daily for 6 months modestly reduces thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroid auto-antibody titers when compared with baseline. Selenium and myo-inositol supplementation also reduced patient-reported hypothyroid symptoms including fatigue, menstrual cycle irregularity, and intolerance to heat or cold (110591). The interpretation of these results is limited by the lack of a control group. In addition, it is unclear if these effects are due to selenium, myo-inositol, or the combination.
• Influenza. Although there is interest in using oral selenium for influenza, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of selenium for this condition.
• Kidney failure. It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial for improving lipid parameters in patients on hemodialysis. Details: Selenium levels may be low in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis, and supplementation might be needed (1805,11053). However, clinical research in patients on hemodialysis shows that taking selenium daily for 3 months does not improve the lipid profile when compared with taking placebo (109095).
• Lichen planus. It is unclear if topical or oral selenium alleviates oral lichen planus symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients with oral lichen planus shows that applying a selenium hydrogel (selenomethionine 14 mcg/gram) twice daily for 6 weeks seems to significantly reduce pain at a 12 week follow-up, but not immediately after use, when compared with applying topical corticosteroids and antifungal agents 2-4 times daily. Taking oral selenium 200 mcg twice daily for 6 weeks seems to be no different than the topical corticosteroids and antifungal treatment at both time points (104422).
• Liver cancer. It is unclear if oral selenium reduces liver cancer risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research in China suggest that taking selenium 200 mcg daily for 2-5 years can reduce the incidence of liver cancer when compared with control (74389). The benefit of selenium on prevention of liver cancer in Western countries is unknown.
• Lymphedema. It is unclear if oral selenium reduces lymphedema complications. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with secondary lymphedema after breast cancer surgery shows that taking a sodium selenite solution 1000 mcg daily for 1 week followed by 300 mcg daily for 2 weeks and then 200 mcg daily for a total of 15 weeks might reduce recurrence of erysipelas, a type of bacterial skin infection, when compared with placebo (15334).
• Male infertility. It is unclear if oral selenium, used alone or in combination with other antioxidants, improves pregnancy or live birth rates for couples with idiopathic male infertility. Details: Meta-analyses of 2-3 clinical trials show that taking selenium, alone or in combination with other antioxidants, for 12-26 weeks modestly improves sperm count and motility when compared with placebo. However, pregnancy rates and live birth rates were only studied in one clinical trial each, with no statistical evidence of benefit (109094). Studies included in the analysis used selenium 26-200 mcg daily for 12-26 weeks, either alone or in combination with vitamin A 1 mg, vitamin C 10 mg, and vitamin E 15 mg; vitamin E 400 IU and folic acid 5 mg; lycopene 6 mg, vitamin E 400 IU, vitamin C 100 mg, zinc 25 mg, folate 0.5 mg, and garlic 1000 mg; or N-acetyl-cysteine 600 mg (74526,74493,102968,109094).
• Mercury toxicity. It is unclear if oral selenium improves clearance of mercury and reduces symptoms of toxicity. Details: A small clinical trial in Chinese adults environmentally exposed to high concentrations of mercury shows that taking selenium-enriched yeast, containing selenium 100 mcg, daily for 3 months increases urinary excretion of mercury when compared with control (90351).
• Muscular dystrophy. There is limited evidence on the oral use of selenium in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Details: Preliminary clinical research suggests that supplementation with sodium selenite 1 mg daily for 6 months does not improve disease activity in patients with muscular dystrophy (74455).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial for weight reduction. Details: A small clinical study in adults with obesity shows that taking selenium 240 mcg daily and following a low-calorie diet for 3 months is no different for weight reduction when compared with following a low-calorie diet alone (104416).
• Oral mucositis. It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial for reducing oral mucositis in patients undergoing radiotherapy. Details: A small clinical study in patients with head and neck cancers shows that taking selenium 200 mcg twice daily for the duration of radiation therapy does not seem to reduce the incidence or severity of oral mucositis when compared with placebo (104421). It is unclear if other doses or routes of administration might be beneficial.
• Osteoarthritis. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with osteoarthritis shows that taking a specific selenium-containing combination supplement (Selenium-ACE) does not improve most clinical symptoms when compared with placebo (74449).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral selenium reduces ovarian cancer risk. Details: Epidemiological research has found that there is no association between dietary selenium intake and the risk of developing ovarian cancer (74342).
• Overall mortality. Although oral selenium does not seem to reduce overall mortality risk in most patients, it might have benefit in patients with low nutrient intake. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that selenium supplementation, alone or in combination with other micronutrients, does not reduce all-cause mortality when compared with placebo (15305,90360,97078). Selenium might also not be beneficial when used in combination with non-nutrient supplements. An additional large clinical study in elderly patients in Sweden shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily plus coenzyme Q10 100 mg twice daily for around 5 years does not reduce the risk of all-cause mortality when compared with placebo. The baseline selenium status of these patients is unclear (92904). Despite these results, some evidence suggests that selenium used with other nutrients might have benefit in patients with low nutrient intake. In a large clinical study, selenium in combination with zinc, vitamin C, vitamin E, and beta-carotene lowered all-cause mortality risk in men, but not women, when compared with control (14109). Researchers speculate that this result occurred because men have a lower intake of dietary antioxidants than women. Another large clinical study in Chinese patients with chronically low nutrient intake shows that taking selenium with beta-carotene and vitamin E decreases stroke mortality, cancer mortality, and total mortality when compared with control (2673).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral selenium reduces pancreatic cancer risk. Details: Some epidemiological research has found that increased selenium intake is associated with a 34% lower risk of pancreatic cancer (97093). However, other observational research has found no association (101342).
• Pancreatitis. Although there is interest in using oral selenium for pancreatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of selenium for this condition.
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial for PCOS. Details: A small clinical study in patients with PCOS shows that taking selenium (Nature Made) 200 mcg daily for 8 weeks results in a significantly higher pregnancy rate of 19%, compared with 3% in those taking placebo. The incidences of alopecia and acne were reduced by 77% and 73%, respectively. There were also modest reductions in hirsutism severity and serum levels of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA); however, there was no effect on other hormone levels (109096). Another small clinical study in patients with PCOS undergoing in vitro fertilization shows that taking selenium yeast 200 mcg daily for 8 weeks improves measures of insulin sensitivity and reduces serum insulin and fasting blood glucose levels when compared with placebo. However, selenium supplementation does not improve the pregnancy rate or lipid parameters (110596). The effect of selenium supplementation on the live birth rate in this population is unclear. Selenium has also been studied in combination with other supplements for patients with PCOS. A small clinical study in adults with PCOS shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily for 12 weeks, in conjunction with a combination probiotic product, modestly improves subjective scores of depression, anxiety, and stress when compared with placebo. Taking this combination also modestly reduces total testosterone levels and subjective ratings of hirsutism when compared with placebo (99659). It is not clear if these effects are due to selenium, the probiotic, or the combination.
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial for postpartum depression. Details: A meta-analysis of two observational studies has found that a high selenium intake is associated with a modestly reduced risk of postpartum depression. The effect of selenium supplementation on symptoms of postpartum depression is unclear. One moderate-sized clinical trial included in this publication shows that taking selenium reduces symptoms of postpartum depression (109091).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral selenium reduces the development of hypertension during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study in pregnant patients shows that drinking a dietary liquid containing selenium 100 mcg daily for 6-8 weeks seems to decrease the incidence of pregnancy-induced hypertension when compared with placebo (74481).
• Premature rupture of membranes (PROM). It is unclear if oral selenium during pregnancy prevents PROM. Details: One clinical trial shows that taking selenium 100 mcg daily from the first trimester of pregnancy until delivery significantly reduces the incidence of PROM to 13%, compared to 34% with placebo (109097).
• Radiation-induced diarrhea. It is unclear if oral selenium reduces diarrhea in patients receiving radiation therapy for cancer. Details: A small clinical study in patients with cervical or endometrial cancer shows that taking selenium 500 mcg on days of radiation therapy and 300 mcg on days without radiation therapy reduces the incidence of radiation-induced diarrhea to 20.5%, compared to 44.5% in the control group not taking selenium. This benefit appears to be more pronounced in patients receiving a larger (>1302 mL) planning target volume of radiation (90355).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if oral selenium, as selenized yeast, reduces RA symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients with RA suggests that taking selenized yeast, providing selenium 200 mcg, daily for 90 days does not improve objective measures of RA when compared with placebo. However, there might be small improvements in quality of life measures (9763).
• Schizophrenia. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with schizophrenia shows that taking a combination of selenium (Nature Made) 200 mcg and a combination probiotic mixture (LactoCare, Zisttakhmir Company) daily for 12 weeks modestly improves general positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, but not positive or negative scores, when compared with placebo. There were also modest improvements in levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), fasting glucose, insulin resistance, and insulin sensitivity, but not lipid parameters (109087).
• Statin-induced myopathy. Small clinical studies suggest that oral selenium may not improve symptoms of myopathy in patients taking statins. Details: Small clinical studies in patients with statin-induced myopathy suggests that taking selenium (SelenoPrecise, Pharma Nord) 200 mcg daily with or without coenzyme Q10 for 3 months does not improve myopathy symptoms when compared with placebo (92908,92909).
• Stroke. It is unclear if intravenous selenium improves neurological outcomes following a stroke. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with a recent first ischemic stroke shows that intravenous sodium selenite pentahydrate (Selenase, Biosyn, Arzenitmittel GmbH) 2000 mcg after admission and then 1000 mcg daily for 5 days modestly improves some, but not all, measures of neurological deficits when compared with placebo (109088). Another small clinical trial in patients with a recent ischemic stroke shows that the same intervention improves some neurological outcome measures on day 7 or at an earlier discharge, but benefits were not maintained at 3 months (109093). The effects of oral selenium on neurological outcomes following a stroke have not been investigated.
• Succinylcholine-induced myalgia. It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial for preventing succinylcholine-induced postoperative myalgia. Details: Clinical research in patients receiving succinylcholine for a sinuscopy shows that taking a single dose of selenium 200 mcg 2 hours before anesthesia induction modestly decreases the incidence of postoperative myalgia at 24 hours. In those taking selenium, 95% of patients had no postoperative myalgia, compared with 77.5% of those taking placebo. Postoperative analgesia requirements were also modestly reduced; however, there was no difference in overall pain or the incidence of muscle twitching (109089).
• Thyroid cancer. It is unclear if oral selenium reduces the risk of thyroid cancer in most patients. Details: In 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding selenium and thyroid cancer risk. This qualified health claim was based on one weak and limited study. The FDA has determined that it is highly uncertain that selenium supplements reduce the risk of thyroid cancer (102373). More recent observational research in postmenopausal individuals using data from the Women's Health Initiative has found that selenium intake at or above the recommended daily allowance from dietary sources or supplements is not associated with a decreased risk of thyroid cancer (110590).
• Ulcerative colitis. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A clinical study in patients with ulcerative colitis shows that taking a liquid supplement containing a combination of selenium, fish oil, fructo-oligosaccharides, acacia, vitamin E, and vitamin C daily for 6 months does not improve disease activity scores when compared with placebo. However, taking the combination supplement seems to reduce the need for oral prednisone for symptom control (13757). The effect of selenium alone is unclear. More evidence is needed to rate selenium for these uses.

(Read more about SELENIUM)

EFFECTIVE

• Vitamin A deficiency. Oral vitamin A is effective for treatment and prevention of vitamin A deficiency. Details: Clinical and observational research in children shows that taking vitamin A orally is effective for preventing and improving symptoms of vitamin A deficiency, including xerophthalmia, night blindness, and Bitot's spots (82329,82689,82710,90773). Vitamin A deficiency can occur due to abnormal storage and transport of vitamin A in people with abetalipoproteinemia, protein deficiency, diabetes mellitus, hyperthyroidism, fever, liver disease, and cystic fibrosis (7135). However, research suggests that supplementation with vitamin A may not be necessary for most newborns with vitamin A deficiency. An observational study in newborns with vitamin A levels of 0.43-0.59 mcmol/L or >0.59 mcmol/L found that vitamin A levels increased naturally over the first six months of life, regardless of oral vitamin A supplementation. However, in infants with very low vitamin A levels (<0.43 mcmol/L), vitamin A supplementation was associated with significant increases in vitamin A levels at 6 months of age when compared with no supplementation, suggesting that only newborns with very low vitamin A levels should receive oral vitamin A (107298).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Aging skin. Topical vitamin A (retinol) formulations seem to improve symptoms of aging skin, such as wrinkles and mottled pigmentation. Details: The vitamin A analog tretinoin (Renova) is a prescription drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for adjunctive use in reducing fine wrinkles, hyperpigmentation, and tactile roughness of aging facial skin (103711). However, this drug is not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, which have not been as extensively evaluated in clinical research. Although research evaluating non-prescription topical vitamin A shows benefit for reducing wrinkles, most studies have been small and used different formulations. One small study in adults over 40 years of age shows that applying a pea size amount of 0.075% retinol cream to the face daily for 26 weeks seems to reduce deep and fine wrinkling when compared with placebo. Applying a lower dose of 0.04% retinol cream for 13 weeks seems to reduce fine wrinkling to a lesser degree, with no effect on deep wrinkles, when compared with placebo cream (104458). Another small clinical study in adults over 80 years of age shows that applying 2 mL of retinol 0.4% lotion to the upper arm up to 3 times weekly for 24 weeks reduces visible wrinkles when compared with placebo (94683). Two small studies in females ages 33 to 65 show that applying retinol 0.15%, 0.3% and 0.5% in liquid crystal formulation once daily to the face for 2-3 months improves skin pigmentation, elasticity, and wrinkles when compared with baseline (103680,104464). The validity of these two studies is limited by the lack of a comparator treatment. Topical vitamin A is frequently combined with other ingredients in commercial formulations; however these combinations have rarely been studied. A small clinical study in adults over 35 years with skin aging shows that applying a cream containing retinol 0.5%, niacinamide, resveratrol, and hexylresorcinol seems to improve wrinkling and skin tone when compared with baseline (104455). Another small preliminary clinical trial in adults ages 35-65 years with periorbital lines and wrinkles shows that applying a cream containing retinol modestly improves dryness, puffiness, redness, and darkness when compared with baseline. The retinol was conjugated with lactic acid, and the cream contained other nutrient and herbal ingredients It was applied around the eyes each evening, sometimes used in combination with another product each morning (109747).
• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Intramuscular vitamin A may reduce the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in very low birth weight infants when given at a dose of 5000 IU three times weekly for 28 days. Lower doses do not seem to be effective. It is unclear if enteral vitamin A is beneficial for BPD. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 clinical trials in premature infants shows that intramuscular administration of vitamin A every other day or three times weekly for 28 days reduces the risk of BPD by around 33% when compared with control (107297). The results from this meta-analysis are primarily driven by a modestly sized clinical trial in very low birth weight infants which shows that intramuscular administration of vitamin A 5000 IU three times weekly for 28 days reduces the risk of BPD by 15% when compared with a sham control (82195). A subgroup analysis of this trial suggests that infants with the lowest BPD risk estimate based on gestational age, birth weight, sex, ethnicity, and oxygen levels 24 hours after birth appear to benefit more from vitamin A therapy than those with higher BPD risk estimates (107296). Previous research in this area utilized a lower dose of only 2000 IU every other day for 28 days, and showed no significant improvement in the rate of BPD (82331,82613). The evaluation of a higher dose was prompted by research noting that the lower doses evaluated in these earlier studies were unable to achieve serum retinol concentrations above 25 mcg/dL, while doses at or above 5000 IU three times weekly could reach this level (82731). Enteral vitamin A has also been investigated. Meta-analyses of two clinical trials show that supplementation with vitamin A at an average of 5,000 IU daily, staring within four days of birth, does not reduce the incidence of BPD when compared with placebo (109750,109753).
• Diarrhea. Vitamin A seems to reduce the incidence of diarrhea in young children. However, it is unclear if oral vitamin A while breastfeeding is beneficial for preventing diarrhea in nursing infants. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in children up to age 5 shows that vitamin A supplementation reduces the incidence of diarrhea by 15% and mortality related to diarrhea by 12% when compared with control, usually placebo or no supplementation (109755). However, one small clinical trial in breastfeeding parents shows that supplementation of vitamin A 1800 IU and ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) 600 IU daily for 2 months does not reduce the risk of diarrhea in the nursing infants when compared with placebo (107293).
• Measles. High-dose oral vitamin A seems to reduce mortality from measles in children under 2 years of age and may also reduce the incidence of measles in children up to 5 years of age. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking vitamin A does not reduce mortality in children with measles when all ages and/or doses are considered (82373,82502,95055,109755). However, in children with measles who are less than 2 years of age, taking vitamin A 200,000 IU orally for at least two doses seems to reduce mortality by up to 83% when compared with placebo (82373,82502). Also, taking vitamin A seems to reduce the incidence of measles in children ages 6 months to 5 years (95055,109755).
• Night vision. Oral vitamin A as retinyl palmitate seems to reduce night blindness during pregnancy in malnourished patients. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin A (as retinyl palmitate) 23,000 IU weekly before and during pregnancy reduces pregnancy-related night blindness by 37% in malnourished patients (6154). Some evidence suggests that zinc supplements might potentiate the effects of vitamin A in restoring sight in zinc-deficient pregnant patients affected by night blindness (8630).
• Oral leukoplakia. High-dose oral vitamin A seems to reduce oral leukoplakia lesions in patients that chew tobacco and/or betel nut. Details: Clinical research in patients with tobacco and/or betel nut chewing habits shows that taking oral vitamin A 200,000-300,000 IU weekly for 6-12 months seems to result in remission of leukoplakia lesions in over 50% of participants when compared with placebo (34674,82617). However, it is unknown if vitamin A prevents the development of oral cancer from oral leukoplakia lesions.
• Overall mortality. In children at risk for vitamin A deficiency, oral vitamin A seems to reduce mortality. However, it does not seem to reduce mortality in healthy adults. Details: Despite previous debate on whether the programs supplying high-dose vitamin A in low- and middle-income countries with prevalent vitamin A deficiency are safe and effective for reducing child mortality, most experts, including World Health Organization, recommend high-dose vitamin A supplementation for those children (95055,95724,97170,109755). In 2010, a meta-analysis of 17 trials involving over 194,000 patients, showed that vitamin A supplementation reduces all-cause mortality by about 24% in children 6 months to 5 years of age (82559). However, some research published after this meta-analysis shows conflicting results (90773,90777). In fact, the largest clinical trial conducted to date (Deworming and Enhanced Vitamin A; DEVTA), which was published after the analysis and involved one million preschool children, suggests that high-dose vitamin A supplementation does not reduce mortality (90773). However, this trial was limited due to under-resourcing and undetermined patient consent and treatment compliance (90773). Furthermore, in 2017, a meta-analysis including the DEVTA trial along with 46 additional studies involving over 1.2 million preschool children, shows that vitamin A supplementation does reduce all-cause mortality by 12% when compared with control (95055). This meta-analysis was updated in 2022 with no additional studies or changes in conclusions (109755). Adult mortality is not reduced by vitamin A supplementation. In fact, some evidence even shows that vitamin A supplementation increases mortality when administered to healthy adult patients or those with a stabilized disease (15305,34622,90775).
• Postpartum complications. Oral vitamin A seems to reduce postpartum diarrhea and mortality in malnourished patients. Details: A large clinical study in malnourished pregnant patients in Nepal shows that taking vitamin A (as retinyl palmitate) 23,000 IU weekly before, during, and after pregnancy reduces the occurrence of blood and mucus in the stool by 93% and the occurrence of diarrhea by up to 90% during the first 6 months postpartum when compared with placebo (2581). Another clinical study in the same population shows that taking vitamin A (as retinyl palmitate) 23,000 IU weekly before and during pregnancy reduces pregnancy-related mortality by 40% when compared with placebo (6153).
• Retinitis pigmentosa. Oral vitamin A supplementation in children with retinitis pigmentosa seems to slow retinal function decline. Details: Observational and clinical research in children with retinitis pigmentosa shows that taking an age-adjusted dose of vitamin A, up to a maximum dose of 15,000 IU daily, modestly attenuates the decline in retinal function when compared with control (83,97167,103677).
• Ulcerative colitis. Oral vitamin A supplementation in patients with ulcerative colitis seems to improve clinical response and mucosal healing. Details: A clinical study in adults with symptomatic ulcerative colitis despite treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid shows that taking vitamin A 25,000 IU daily for 2 months reduces disease severity and increases the rate of clinical response and mucosal healing when compared with placebo. The number needed to treat (NNT) for clinical response is 3; the NNT for mucosal healing is 5 (100329).
• Wrinkled skin. Topical vitamin A (retinol) formulations seem to improve photodamage and wrinkles. Details: The vitamin A analog tretinoin (Renova) is a prescription drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for adjunctive use in reducing fine wrinkles, hyperpigmentation, and tactile roughness of facial skin (103711). This drug is not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, which have not been as extensively evaluated in clinical research. Still, some research in females ages 35-65 with moderately wrinkled and photoaged skin suggests that commercially available retinol formulations might reduce wrinkles and skin roughness similarly to tretinoin. One study used retinol serum starting at a concentration of 0.25% and increased to 1% over 3 months, compared with tretinoin cream 0.025% gradually increased to 0.1% (103671), while another study compared a gradual release tri-retinol 1.1% cream applied daily for 3 months to tretinoin 0.025% cream (104456). Commercial retinol also seems to be beneficial when compared with placebo. A small study in adults over 40 years old with photodamaged skin shows that applying stabilized retinol 0.1% to the face daily for one year improves wrinkles and mottled pigmentation in over 50% of the participants when compared with a placebo treatment (104463).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Atopic disease. Supplementation with oral vitamin A does not seem to reduce the risk of atopy. Details: Clinical research in infants born in Guinea-Bissau shows that a single dose of vitamin A does not reduce the incidence of atopy when compared with placebo (90779,90780). Furthermore, giving a single dose of vitamin A to some infants, such as low birth weight infants and infants given Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination, was associated with increased atopy and wheeze (90779).
• Fetal and premature infant mortality. Giving oral vitamin A to malnourished adults during pregnancy and postpartum does not seem to reduce fetal, early infant, or first year mortality. Giving oral or intramuscular vitamin A to the infant also does not seem to reduce mortality in most patients. Details: Most meta-analyses of clinical research in malnourished patients suggest that vitamin A supplementation during pregnancy or postpartum does not reduce fetal, early infant, or first year mortality (6152,34601,34602,34627,82479,82566,82567,90774,90776,90782,90784,95057,109750,109753). Also, giving vitamin A supplements or intramuscular vitamin A to low birth weight infants does not appear to reduce mortality in these patients (82195,82431,82498,90778,90781,95053,107296,107297). Furthermore, vitamin A supplementation in term infants from low or middle income countries also does not appear to reduce the risk of mortality at 6 or 12 months of age when compared with placebo (95054,103674). Some evidence from a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin A supplementation may reduce the risk of mortality at 6 months in Asian infants, although it appears to increase the risk of mortality at 6 months in studies conducted in Africa. It also appears to increase the risk of mortality in female term infants by 12 months (95054).
• Intestinal parasite infection. Oral high-dose vitamin A does not seem to prevent reinfection with intestinal parasites. Details: Clinical research in children living in Malaysia that were given albendazole 400 mg daily for 3-4 days for parasitic worms, shows that adding a single dose of vitamin A 200,000 IU does not help to prevent reinfection when compared with placebo (90772).
• Melanoma. Oral vitamin A in patients with resected melanoma does not seem to improve survival and disease recurrence. Details: A clinical study in patients with completely resected melanoma shows that taking vitamin A 100,000 IU daily for 18 months does not increase disease-free survival when compared with no supplementation (82670).
• Miscarriage. Oral vitamin A given to the mother does not prevent miscarriage or stillbirth. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that maternal supplementation with oral vitamin A, either alone or in combination with other vitamins, prior to or during early pregnancy does not reduce the risk of miscarriage or stillbirth when compared with control (104462).
• Sepsis. Most research shows that oral vitamin A does not reduce the risk of sepsis in premature infants. Details: A meta-analysis of three clinical trials in premature infants shows that providing supplemental enteral vitamin A 1500-5000 IU daily, starting within four days of birth, does not reduce the incidence of sepsis when compared with placebo (109753).
• Tuberculosis. Oral vitamin A does not seem to improve tuberculosis disease duration or mortality. Details: Low levels of vitamin A are common in patients with tuberculosis. However, taking vitamin A 2000 IU to 200,000 IU by mouth for 2-24 months does not improve symptoms, decrease disease duration, or reduce mortality when compared with placebo in these patients (82570,103668,109754). This may be due to the fact that vitamin A levels may normalize following the initiation of tuberculosis treatment, even without additional vitamin A supplementation.

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Head and neck cancer. Oral vitamin A taken for 2 years does not seem to improve survival or prevent head and neck cancer recurrence. Details: A large clinical study n patients with a history of head and neck cancer shows that taking vitamin A as retinyl palmitate 300,000 IU daily for 1 year, and followed by 150,000 IU daily for another year, does not reduce the risk of second primary tumors or tumor recurrence when compared with placebo. Also, vitamin A does not seem to improve survival or event-free survival (1710).
• HIV transmission. Oral vitamin A does not reduce vertical HIV transmission risk. There is some concern that vitamin A might increase HIV transmission through breast milk. Details: Observational and intervention research shows that taking vitamin A orally does not decrease the risk of HIV transmission to the fetus during pregnancy, to newborns during delivery, or to infants during early breast-feeding (6376,82470,95059). Preliminary clinical research also shows that vitamin A supplementation of pregnant adults with HIV infection might increase the risk of HIV transmission to their babies through breast milk (9801).
• Lower respiratory tract infections. Oral vitamin A does not reduce the risk for lower respiratory tract infections in children. It is unclear if supplementation of oral vitamin A while breast-feeding reduces the risk of lower respiratory tract infections in nursing infants. Details: Taking vitamin A by mouth does not prevent or reduce symptoms of lower respiratory tract infections, such as cough and fever, in children (82288,82443). Furthermore, some research shows that vitamin A is associated with a slight increase in the risk of respiratory tract infections when administered to children with adequate nutritional status (82288). Additionally, one small clinical trial in breast-feeding parents shows that supplementation of vitamin A 1800 IU and ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) 600 IU daily for 2 months does not reduce the risk of febrile illness or respiratory tract infections in the nursing infants when compared with placebo (107293).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Although prescription vitamin A analogs are approved to treat acne, it is unclear if non-prescription topical vitamin A products help with acne symptoms. Details: The high-dose vitamin A analogs adapalene (Differin) and tazarotene (Tazorac) are prescription drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of acne (103712,103713). These drugs are not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, such as retinol, which have not been extensively evaluated in clinical research. A small preliminary clinical trial in adolescents and young adults with mild to moderate acne shows that applying topical benzoyl peroxide 2.5% each morning and a topical retinol plus salicylic acid product each evening for 12 weeks modestly improves acne severity and other measures of complexion when compared with baseline. All patients also used the same cleanser twice daily (109748). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Alcohol-related liver disease. Oral vitamin A has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis shows that taking vitamin A in combination with coenzyme Q10 and other vitamins and minerals daily for 6 months does not improve survival when compared with placebo (61392).
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for preventing asthma in children. Details: An observational study in children has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin A is associated with a lower risk of asthma. Children in the highest quartile of vitamin A intake (median of 2267 IU daily) at 7 years of age had improved lung function and 32% lower odds of asthma at 11-14 years of age when compared with children in the lowest quartile of vitamin A intake (median of 870 IU daily) (107291).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if supplementation of oral vitamin A while breast-feeding is beneficial for preventing eczema in nursing infants. Details: One small clinical trial in breast-feeding parents shows that supplementation of vitamin A 1800 IU and ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) 600 IU daily for 2 months does not reduce the risk of eczema in the nursing infants when compared with placebo (107293).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for improving symptoms of autism. Details: Children with autism spectrum disorder are at increased risk for vitamin A deficiency, and vitamin A levels have been inversely associated with autism symptoms. Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of vitamin A 200,000 IU slightly improves emotional response, communication, and other symptoms when compared to baseline (97168). The lack of a control group limits the validity of these findings. Another preliminary clinical study in children with autism and vitamin A deficiency shows that taking vitamin A 50,000 IU weekly for 6 months, but not as a single dose of 200,000 IU, seems to improve social impairment scores when compared with control. Controls were children with autism without vitamin A deficiency that did not take a supplement (104459).
• Breast cancer. Although vitamin A intake has been associated with a reduced risk for breast cancer, it is unclear if vitamin A supplements are beneficial. Details: Epidemiological evidence has found an association between high intake of vitamin A and a reduced risk of breast cancer. A meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that the adults with the highest intake of vitamin A, either from diet alone or also from supplements, reduces the odds of developing breast cancer by 16% when compared with the lowest intake (1444,34610,109752). However, the effects of supplemental vitamin A, specifically, are unclear.
• Cataracts. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for cataract prevention. Details: A large-scale population-based study has found that high dietary intake of vitamin A is associated with a reduced risk of nuclear cataracts (6378). Also, other population research has found that the highest dietary intake of vitamin A is associated with a 17% lower risk of cataracts when compared with the lowest intakes (90786). However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the association between blood levels of vitamin A and the risk of cataracts (90786,90944). It is not known if supplemental vitamin A is beneficial.
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for cervical cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that increased vitamin A levels in the blood or higher vitamin A intakes are associated with a reduced risk of cervical cancer. However, this effect is observed when both forms of vitamin A, either retinol or carotenoids, are considered. When only the retinol form is considered, vitamin A supplementation does not seem to reduce the risk of cervical cancer (34613,109752). Also, a meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that vitamin A intake, either from diet alone or supplements, does not affect the risk of cervical cancer (109752).
• Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. It is unclear if oral vitamin A helps to prevent diarrhea caused by chemotherapy. Details: A very small clinical study in children receiving chemotherapy shows that taking vitamin A orally does not seem to prevent GI adverse effects, including diarrhea and mouth pain, when compared with control (9802).
• Child development. Oral vitamin A might improve growth and development in children with vitamin A deficiency, but not in those with good nutritional status. Details: Supplementing with vitamin A 60 mg for up to 9 years does not promote or improve child growth in children with appropriate nutritional status (20132). However, in children with vitamin A deficiency, supplementation with vitamin A may improve growth (82246).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There is limited evidence on the oral use of vitamin A in patients with emphysema. Details: Observational research has found that consuming recommended amounts of vitamin A in the diet is associated with 33% lower odds of developing emphysema (103678).
• Colorectal adenoma. Oral vitamin A has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination supplement containing selenium, zinc, vitamin A, vitamin C, and vitamin E orally daily for 5 years or until the recurrence of an adenoma reduces the risk of recurrent large-bowel adenomas by about 40% when compared with placebo in patients with large-bowel adenomas (92903). It is not clear if this benefit is due to vitamin A or other constituents.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for colorectal cancer prevention. Details: Taking vitamin A alone or in combination with beta-carotene does not seem to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer (12185).
• Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. It is unclear if oral vitamin A improves recovery after CABG surgery. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking vitamin A 5000 IU daily (as retinol palmitate) for 21 days starting on the day of CABG surgery reduces time in intensive care after surgery by 46% to 69% compared to a control group not given vitamin A (90783). Supplementation with vitamin A also improves total hospitalization time for those patients with adequate zinc status (90783).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19. Details: Clinical research in COVID-19 outpatients treated with hydroxychloroquine shows that taking vitamin A 25,000 IU daily for 10 days modestly reduces the number of patients with symptoms of fever, body ache, and fatigue when compared with placebo. However, there was no effect on the number of patients with cough, shortness of breath, lack of appetite, chest pain, diarrhea, loss of smell, or headache (109745).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for depression. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that dietary intake of vitamin A is inversely associated with depression. The highest intake of vitamin A was associated with a 17% reduced risk of depression when compared with the lowest intake. Also, vitamin A intake was lower in individuals with depression (109743). The effect of vitamin A supplementation is unclear.
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for esophageal cancer prevention. Details: Observational research has found that higher beta-carotene and vitamin A intake is associated with a reduced risk of esophageal cancer (34551,103675). However, evidence from higher-quality clinical research shows that taking vitamin A in combination with beta-carotene does not reduce the risk of esophageal cancer (12185).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for gastric cancer prevention. Details: Taking vitamin A alone and in combination with beta-carotene does not seem to reduce the risk of gastric cancer (12185).
• Glaucoma. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for glaucoma prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that a high dietary intake of vitamin A is associated with a 37% reduced risk of glaucoma when compared with a low intake (109742).
• HIV/AIDS. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for improving HIV/AIDs outcomes. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical trials and population research shows that maternal vitamin A supplementation of mothers with poor vitamin A status at baseline does not influence child or maternal mortality, hospitalization rate, or HIV/AIDS progression. However, pediatric vitamin A supplementation seems to decrease mortality rates in children with HIV/AIDS when compared with placebo (34529,95059).
• HIV/AIDS-related diarrhea. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for preventing diarrhea associated with HIV. Details: A large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin A can decrease the rate of diarrhea-specific mortality by up to 92% in vitamin A-deficient children with or without HIV/AIDS (1465). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin A does not significantly reduce diarrhea-specific mortality when only children with HIV/AIDS are considered (82511). But vitamin A does appear to reduce overall mortality in these children by 50% to 63% (1465,82511).
• Human papillomavirus (HPV). It is unclear if topical or oral vitamin A is beneficial for the resolution of genital warts caused by HPV. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical trials in patients with genital warts suggests that the oral prescription drugs isotretinoin and etretinate might promote resolution of warts when compared with baseline. However, the topical prescription drug tretinoin 0.05% cream does not seem to help (104460). These drugs are not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, such as retinol.
• Infant development. It is unclear if intramuscular vitamin A improves the development of low birth weight infants. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that giving intramuscular vitamin A to very low birth weight infants reduces the risk of chronic lung disease at 36 weeks postmenstrual age by about 13% compared to control (95053). Preliminary clinical research also shows that giving intramuscular vitamin A along with inhaled nitric oxide gas for 3 weeks to low birth weight infants on mechanical ventilation might improve mental development at one year in some of these patients when compared with inhaled nitric oxide gas alone (90778). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intramuscular vitamin A does not improve neurodevelopment in very low birth weight infants (95053).
• Iron deficiency anemia. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of anemia due to iron deficiency. Details: Some research in children and pregnant adults without anemia shows that taking vitamin A increases plasma levels of hemoglobin and ferritin, and may reduce the risk of developing anemia (9518,34627). However, another study in pregnant patients, half of whom had anemia at baseline and half of whom did not have anemia, shows that taking 3000 mcg retinol orally in combination with iron and folate does not improve hemoglobin or erythropoietin concentrations when compared with taking iron and folate (9188). In preterm infants with existing anemia, taking vitamin A 5000 IU and vitamin B complex 40 mg daily improves serum ferritin, hemoglobin, and reticulocyte levels and reduces the need for blood transfusions when compared with taking either vitamin alone. Taking vitamin A alone, however, does not improve these outcomes (100330).
• Leukemia. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for leukemia prevention. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with chronic myelogenous leukemia shows that taking a specific vitamin A product (Aquasol, Armour Pharmaceuticals) 50,000 IU orally daily in combination with busulfan therapy does not significantly increase progression-free survival or overall survival when compared with busulfan alone. Furthermore, supplementation with vitamin A plus busulfan seems to increase the percentage of patients who experience grade 2 toxicity by about 5-fold when compared with busulfan alone (82652).
• Liver cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for liver cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that vitamin A supplementation or serum levels of vitamin A are not associated with the risk of liver cancer (97169).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for lung cancer treatment or prevention. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of vitamin A is not associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer (35628). Furthermore, supplementation with vitamin A and beta-carotene seems to increase the risk of lung cancer in smokers or those exposed to asbestos (2642,34675). A large clinical trial in patients with existing lung cancer shows that vitamin A 300,000 IU daily for one year followed by 150,000 IU daily for a second year does not increase survival (1710). However, some clinical research shows that high-dose vitamin A 300,000 IU daily following curative lung cancer resection reduces the risk of new primary tumors in patients heavily exposed to tobacco (7875).
• Malaria. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for reducing symptoms of malaria in young children. Details: Taking vitamin A orally seems to help decrease symptoms of malaria in children less than 3 years of age living in endemic areas (1464). However, other clinical research shows that single doses of vitamin A 100,000 to 200,000 IU do not improve coma resolution, convulsions, fever, parasite clearance, or mortality in infants and children less than 5 years of age with cerebral malaria (90785).
• Multiple sclerosis-related fatigue. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for reducing fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis receiving interferon beta-1a shows that taking vitamin A 25,000 IU (as retinyl palmitate) (Zahravi Pharmaceutical) daily for 6 months followed by 10,000 IU daily for 6 months, improves physical, cognitive, and psychosocial fatigue when compared with placebo (95052).
• Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). A meta-analysis of several small clinical trials suggests that intramuscular vitamin A does not seem to prevent NEC. Details: A meta-analysis of 3 small clinical studies in very low birth weight infants shows that intramuscular administration of vitamin A 1500-5000 IU every other day or three times weekly for 28 days does not reduce the risk of NEC when compared with a control (107297).
• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for non-Hodgkin lymphoma prevention. Details: Population research has found that intake of vitamin A at levels above 2330 mcg daily is associated with a 17% lower risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma when compared with those whose daily intake of vitamin A is less than 642 mcg per day (90945).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for nonmelanoma skin cancer prevention. Details: Observational research over 26 years found that higher dietary vitamin A intake is associated with a 12% reduced risk for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in healthy patients when compared with lower vitamin A intake (101673).
• Oral clefts. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for oral cleft prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that periconceptional use of vitamin A, from diet and/or supplements, is associated with a 13% reduced incidence of cleft lip alone or with a cleft palate, but is not associated with the risk of cleft palate alone, in the child (109751).
• Osteoarthritis. Oral vitamin A has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with osteoarthritis shows that taking a specific product containing vitamin A in combination with selenium, vitamin C, and vitamin E (Selenium ACE, Carls-Berghs Farmaceutiska AB) does not appear to alleviate symptoms when compared with placebo (74449).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: Most observational research has found that increased dietary intake of vitamin A is associated with a reduced risk of developing ovarian cancer (9193,103679,109752). The most recent meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that adults with the highest intake of vitamin A, either from diet alone or supplements, reduces the odds of developing ovarian cancer by 19% when compared with the lowest intake (109752).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for pancreatic cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that higher intake of vitamin A is associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer; however, this benefit appears to be limited to only hospital-based cases and studies conducted in Europe (95060). In contrast, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin A in combination with beta-carotene does not reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer (12185).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin A prevents Parkinson disease development. Details: Population research has found that blood levels or dietary intake of vitamin A are not associated with the risk of Parkinson disease (91164).
• Photoreactive keratectomy. Oral vitamin A has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking a specific product (Evitex capsules, Alcon) containing vitamin A along with vitamin E seems to improve healing after photoreactive keratectomy. High dose (50,000 to 75,000 IU) vitamin A in the form of retinol palmitate taken daily with vitamin E (alpha-tocopheryl nicotinate) 460-590 mg daily seems to accelerate re-epithelialization, reduce haze formation, and improve visual acuity in patients undergoing laser surgery for myopia (348).
• Pneumonia. Oral vitamin A does not seem to prevent mortality related to pneumonia in children. However, it is unclear if vitamin A reduces symptom severity and hospitalization in children. Details: Clinical research in children living in developing countries shows that taking vitamin A orally does not prevent mortality related to pneumonia (1466,82362,82504,82717,109749). However, the evidence related to symptom duration and severity is mixed. A large study and early meta-analyses show that vitamin A does not prevent pneumonia or decrease the severity or length of hospitalization in children with pneumonia (1466,82362,82504,82717). A more recent meta-analysis also shows that giving vitamin A to children at or below 5 years of age does not affect the duration of hospitalization (109755). The best evidence to date comes from a recent meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. This meta-analysis shows that, when given in combination with conventional therapy to children up to 10 years of age, vitamin A reduces the duration of symptoms including fever, cough, lung rale, and shortness of breath, as well as the duration of hospitalization and time to a negative X-ray, when compared with conventional therapy alone (109749). However, the number of trials evaluating each endpoint is small and more research is needed to confirm these findings.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if vitamin A reduces the duration of hospitalization for premature infants. Details: A meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials in preterm infants shows that providing supplemental enteral vitamin A 1500-5000 IU daily, starting within four days of birth, does not reduce the duration of hospitalization when compared with placebo (109750).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Observational studies suggest that dietary intake of vitamin A is not associated with a reduced risk of prostate cancer (14134).
• Psoriasis. It is unclear if topical vitamin A is beneficial for psoriasis symptoms. Details: The vitamin A analog tazarotene (Tazorac) is a prescription drug that is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to treat stable plaque psoriasis covering up to 20% body surface area (103713). This drug is not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, such as retinol.
• Radiation proctopathy. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for reducing chronic radiation proctopathy symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients experiencing chronic radiation proctopathy caused by pelvic radiotherapy shows that taking retinol palmitate 10,000 IU daily for 90 days might reduce rectal symptoms when compared with placebo (82350).
• Retinopathy of prematurity. Most small studies show that oral or intramuscular vitamin A does not reduce the risk of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Details: A meta-analysis of 4 small clinical studies in very low birth weight infants shows that intramuscular administration of vitamin A 2000-10,000 IU every other day or three times weekly, or oral vitamin A 2000 IU daily, for 28 days does not reduce the risk of ROP when compared with a control (107297). Another meta-analysis of clinical research shows that providing supplemental enteral vitamin A 1500 IU or an average of 5000 IU daily, starting within four days of birth, does not reduce the incidence of severe ROP (109750,109753). However, a very small clinical study in preterm infants, which was not included in the meta-analysis, shows that receiving retinol palmitate drops 3000 IU/kg daily for 28 days reduces the risk of ROP by 88% when compared with no treatment (103672).
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). It is unclear if adding oral vitamin A to antibiotic therapy is beneficial for symptoms of acute pyelonephritis in young females. Details: A small clinical study in females 2-12 years of age with a first occurrence of acute pyelonephritis shows that taking vitamin A 1500 units/kg daily for 10 days in conjunction with antibiotics decreases the duration of fever by about 1.3 days and reduces urinary frequency by about 1.5 episodes per day when compared to taking placebo with antibiotics. Taking vitamin A might also reduce the occurrence of moderate or severe renal scarring after 6 months when compared with placebo (100327). The validity of these findings is limited by small study size and a high dropout rate.
• Warts. It is unclear if topical or oral vitamin A improves the resolution of viral warts. Details: A meta-analysis of observational and clinical research in patients with viral warts suggests that receiving prescription oral retinoids (isotretinoin, acitretin, etretinate) seems to produce a 61% rate of wart resolution. Prescription topical retinoids seems to produce a 64% rate of wart resolution (104461). These drugs are not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, such as retinol. More evidence is needed to rate vitamin A for these uses.

(Read more about VITAMIN A)

EFFECTIVE

• Imerslund-Grasbeck disease. Intramuscular vitamin B12 is effective for patients with this condition. Details: Administering intramuscular vitamin B12 (hydroxocobalamin) 1 mg daily for 10 days, followed by monthly injections for the remainder of a patient's life, is effective for treating familial selective vitamin B12 malabsorption (Imerslund-Grasbeck disease) (15,82862).
• Vitamin B12 deficiency. Administering vitamin B12 orally, intramuscularly, or intranasally is effective for preventing and treating vitamin B12 deficiency. Details: Vitamin B12 deficiency has varying definitions but is often defined as vitamin B12 (cobalamin) levels less than 180-200 pmol/L (or 240 pg/mL). Some believe that only intramuscular vitamin B12 is effective for treating vitamin B12 deficiency. However, clinical research shows that oral therapy increases cobalamin levels similarly to intramuscular administration, even in patients with pernicious anemia or malabsorption, if a high enough dose is given (2909,2911,2915,9335,82832) (82836,82949,82860,103976,103972,107141,107144). Some evidence suggests that the most effective oral dose is between 647-1032 mcg daily (13106). However, in certain situations, intramuscular treatment might be more appropriate. Guidelines by the British Committee for Standards in Hematology recommend only intramuscular vitamin B12 for initial treatment of severe vitamin B12 deficiency in patients with pernicious anemia, malabsorption disorders, or neurological involvement (94722). Intramuscular vitamin B12 is also appropriate in patients with diarrhea or vomiting and those likely to be nonadherent (103972). Vitamin B12 deficiency is especially common in older adults, primarily due to lack of intrinsic factor and malabsorption (2915,2919,9335). Daily supplementation with vitamin B12 50-100 mcg might be needed to correct deficiency (10126), while daily doses of 25-37.5 mcg help to maintain normal levels over time (9335). In addition to supplements, foods such as milk and bread fortified with vitamin B12 can be used and are approximately 55% to 60% absorbed by people over 60 years of age (10124). Vitamin B12 deficiency is also common in patients that have had gastric surgery, including gastrectomy and bariatric surgery (107144,107145). Taking vitamin B12 in the doses found in multivitamins or generic vitamin B supplements does not seem to prevent vitamin B12 deficiency following bariatric surgery (107145). However, taking methylcobalamin 500 mcg daily is beneficial for treating vitamin B12 deficiency associated with a total gastrectomy and taking cyanocobalamin 5000 mcg daily is beneficial for preventing vitamin B12 deficiency following gastric bypass (107144). Other people at risk for vitamin B12 deficiency include strict vegetarians who eat no animal products (vegans) and people with increased vitamin B12 requirements associated with pregnancy, thyrotoxicosis, hemolytic anemia, hemorrhage, malignancy, and hepatic and kidney disease. Moderate consumption of animal products may not be sufficient to restore and maintain vitamin B12 levels, especially in adolescents who had consumed macrobiotic (vegan type) diets for the first 6 years of life. High dietary intake of vitamin B12 or supplements is usually needed in order to restore and maintain optimal vitamin B12 levels in these adolescents (10125).