Lecithin Granules [Discontinued] by Country Life

EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Oral calcium carbonate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an antacid. Details: Taking calcium carbonate orally as an antacid is effective for treating dyspepsia (1843). Calcium carbonate has FDA approval as an antacid.
• Hyperkalemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities. Details: Administering calcium gluconate intravenously can reverse electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias induced by hyperkalemia (12946). Intravenous calcium gluconate is FDA-approved for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities.
• Hypocalcemia. Oral calcium treats and prevents hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium is used to treat severe hypocalcemia. Details: Taking calcium orally is effective for treating and preventing hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate, acetate, gluceptate, or chloride is effective for severe hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany (12928).
• Kidney failure. Oral calcium carbonate or calcium acetate is used as a phosphate binder during kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium carbonate or calcium acetate orally is effective as a phosphate binder. Calcium acetate (PhosLo) appears to control hyperphosphatemia better than sevelamer (Renagel) (12943,12944,38990). Calcium citrate is not recommended for this purpose because it increases aluminum absorption and does not bind phosphate as efficiently as calcium acetate or calcium carbonate (21631). Some clinical research also shows that taking calcium orally reduces blood pressure in patients with kidney failure (975).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral calcium in combination with vitamin D prevents bone density loss that occurs during long-term treatment with corticosteroids. Details: Taking calcium in combination with vitamin D as adjunctive therapy seems to be effective for reducing bone mineral density loss in people using corticosteroids long-term (982,1046,1830,1831,1832,4462,4463,4464,4465,4466)(4467,12945,38493). One specific product used in clinical research is Oscal (Marion Merrel Dow Inc.), which contains elemental calcium 500 mg per tablet plus vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (982). Another product used is Oscal 250 + D (SmithKline Beecham Healthcare), which contains elemental calcium 250 mg and vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (1046).
• Hyperparathyroidism. Oral calcium reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium orally reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with kidney failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism (1827,1828,1829,39174,39425). In elderly women, the combination of calcium and vitamin D reverses secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces hip fracture risk (8818). Also, population research suggests increased calcium intake from the diet and supplements reduces the risk of primary hyperparathyroidism in women. Supplemental intakes of at least 500 mg/day and dietary intakes of approximately 1100 mg/day are considered to be protective (91353).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate calcium intake, from the diet and/or supplements, is recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate calcium intake in line with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) by age, along with adequate vitamin D intake, for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake when adequate dietary intake is not feasible (109425). In the US and Canada, foods containing at least 200 mg calcium with less phosphorous content than calcium can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate calcium intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (11940,102148). However, calcium supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Also, calcium supplements do not seem to be effective for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) during lactation (988), in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation (1817), or in patients who have had renal transplantation (4823,38736,38871). Maximal bone growth occurs in the teenage years, and then BMD in females remains relatively constant until age 30-40. After age 40, bone loss typically occurs at rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. In males, this occurs several decades later. Bone loss is more pronounced if dietary calcium intake is below the RDA, which is the case for many Americans (2571,2578). One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy children 7-14 years old shows that fortifying food with calcium 250-1000 mg daily for up to 24 months modestly improves femoral neck BMD, but not hip or spine BMD. However, the included trials did not supplement vitamin D (107232). During the 5 years immediately after menopause, calcium supplementation has very little effect on bone loss (2569,2570,2575,2576). The rapid loss of estrogen causes a high bone resorption rate, which increases serum calcium levels and therefore decreases intestinal absorption of calcium (2570). After this period, the typical rate of bone loss is 2% per year (2572,2576). Taking calcium 1000-1600 mg daily as carbonate, citrate, lactate gluconate, or citrate malate salt decreases this rate by 0.25% to 1% annually (977,979,981,2569,2571,2572,2575,2576,2578,6850)(38978,38980,39064). The greatest reductions (1% or more) are seen in the first 1-2 years of supplementation when bone remodeling foci can be filled (2569,2576). After this period, the differences in rate of loss between supplemented and non-supplemented females are closer to 0.25% per year (2569,2577). A meta-analysis of clinical evidence suggests that there is no additional benefit after 4 years (38980). Small clinical studies have found that continuous calcium supplementation at an average daily dose of 1050 mg, started after menopause and continued for 1.5-4 years, may reduce fracture rates by 26% when compared with no calcium supplementation. The largest of these studies was conducted in nursing home residents who also received daily vitamin D; the benefits of calcium, specifically, are unclear (39386). Some research also suggests that calcium and vitamin D improves primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in some older individuals with osteoporosis, particularly the elderly and those who are no longer community dwelling (12930,38875,38849,39026,109471). However, not all research is positive. One large clinical trial in elderly adults with a low-trauma fracture show that taking calcium 1000 mg daily with or without vitamin D 800 IU daily for 2-7 years does not reduce the risk of a second fracture when compared with placebo (13073). Another clinical study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 800 IU daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (less than 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). Also, some exploratory research suggests that supplements may need to be continued indefinitely; in adults over 68 years of age, any effects of 2 years of calcium supplements on BMD appear to be lost within 2 years after discontinuing supplements (6853). Calcium has additive effects when used with other agents such as vitamin D, estrogens, or calcitonin. Whereas calcium alone generally reduces or prevents loss of BMD, combination with other agents can produce small increases in BMD ranging from 0.3% to 3.3% depending on the combination and dosages used (978,980,1836,2570,2571,2572,2576). However, one meta-analysis in healthy adults shows that fortifying foods with calcium 250-1000 mg daily, in conjunction with vitamin D supplementation, for up to 24 months does not improve BMD when compared with control (107232). The full potential of osteoporosis treatments cannot be realized without adequate calcium intake (2569,2570,2571,2572). Advise patients taking agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene (Evista) to ensure that their daily calcium intake meets the RDA. Use supplements if necessary. The usefulness of calcium in preventing osteoporosis in males is not as well-studied. Some observational research has found that calcium 870 mg daily is not associated with changes in BMD and bone loss in males (97201). However, clinical evidence suggests that taking calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years might improve trabecular or cortical bone mass by 2% to 4% (980,8827,8873). Dietary supplementation with calcium and vitamin D seems to moderately reduce bone loss measured in the femoral neck, spine, and total body, and seems to reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in older patients with osteopenia or low BMD (980).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Adequate calcium intake seems to prevent symptoms of PMS. Details: There seems to be a link between low dietary calcium intake and symptoms of PMS (2004,6847,39007). Taking calcium 1000-1336 mg daily seems to significantly reduce depressed mood, water retention, and pain, especially if daily calcium intake is inadequate (1822,1823,1824,2004,95821). Calcium carbonate 1200 mg daily seems to decrease PMS symptom scores by about 18% when compared with placebo (1822). Increasing dietary calcium intake is also associated with a decreased risk of developing PMS. Consuming an average of 1283 mg of calcium per day from foods is associated with about a 30% lower risk of developing PMS compared with consuming an average of 529 mg daily (13094); however, taking calcium supplements does not appear to be associated with the risk of developing PMS.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Oral calcium seems to be beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer, especially in those with adequate vitamin D levels and normal body mass index (BMI). Details: Population studies have found that increased intake of dietary or supplemental calcium is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas (1047,8820,12120,38951,98898,98899). Clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research also show that taking calcium supplements 1.2-2 grams daily for up to 4 years can reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence by up to 29% (970,12118,12950,15267,34596,38718,39042,95817). However, not all research has been positive. Some meta-analyses of clinical research or observational studies suggest that taking calcium does not reduce the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer (34596,39042,39349). Other contradictory research suggests that postmenopausal females who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290); however, this finding may not be reliable due to the high baseline intake of calcium in study participants. The reason for these conflicting findings is not entirely clear. Vitamin D might be an important factor. People with lower than average vitamin D levels do not seem to get any benefit from calcium supplements (12118). Also, one meta-analysis of previous trials suggests that taking calcium 1200 mg daily reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas in people with a normal BMI, but not in those who are overweight or obese (99715). Despite this conflicting evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2005 stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence to support this claim (102366).
• Fetal bone mineralization. If calcium intakes are low during pregnancy, oral calcium seems to be beneficial for increasing fetal bone density. Details: With low dietary calcium intake (less than 562 mg elemental calcium daily) during pregnancy, calcium supplementation increases fetal bone mineralization and density. However, calcium supplementation does not offer any additional benefit if calcium intakes are adequate (3263,3264).
• Hypertension. Oral calcium seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount. However, it is unclear if this reduction is clinically significant. Details: Many clinical trials and observational studies show that intake of calcium supplements or dietary calcium modestly reduces blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension, usually around 1-2 mmHg. Calcium seems to be more effective for certain subpopulations of patients, such as salt-sensitive people and patients with low baseline dietary calcium intake (945,972,974,976,984,1818,1819,1820,1821,6852)(13138,14406,38803,39063,39094,39221). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium intake during pregnancy reduces systolic blood pressure in offspring by 1-2 mmHg (38852). However, a large-scale clinical trial in postmenopausal females shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg daily does not lower blood pressure or reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials shows that taking calcium in combination with vitamin D for up to 7 years has no effect on blood pressure (98861). The validity of this finding is limited by the poor methodological quality of the included studies. Some observational research suggests that calcium can reduce the risk for hypertension. Population research in females aged 45 years and older suggests that higher intake of calcium from both diet and supplement sources is linked to a lower risk of developing hypertension when compared to lower calcium intake (14265). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension. However, the FDA has concluded that this claim is based on supporting, rather than conclusive, evidence (102367).
• Osteomalacia. Oral calcium seems to reverse osteomalacia caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Osteomalacia is commonly caused by vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to osteomalacia in children and adults. Calcium supplementation can reverse osteomalacia caused by calcium deficiency. Along with appropriate vitamin D supplementation, individuals at risk of osteomalacia need sufficient calcium intake (94819).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral calcium seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia in high risk pregnancies, especially if calcium intakes are low. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (971,38756), most clinical research shows that taking calcium orally 1-2 grams daily reduces pregnancy-related hypertension and pre-eclampsia (973,1833,8828,39043,39319,39426,96480). Calcium appears to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia by about 50% when compared with placebo. One meta-analysis of 19 controlled trials involving over 29,000 pregnancies found that for every 19 females treated with calcium, one episode of pre-eclampsia would be avoided (96480). Calcium appears to have the greatest effect in individuals at high-risk of pre-eclampsia or with low calcium levels, and when taken at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation (15029,38497,96480,99714). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding the use of calcium supplements to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. However, due to the limited and conflicting research available at that time, the FDA stated that this outcome was highly unlikely. Since then, large, high-quality clinical research has supported this finding. In fact, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released a recommendation to prescribe oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancies at high risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary calcium intakes are low, in order to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).
• Rickets. Oral calcium seems to reverse rickets caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Rickets is commonly caused be vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to rickets. Calcium supplementation can reverse rickets caused by calcium deficiency (94819). A small clinical study in children with nutritional rickets shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily for 24 weeks improves radiographically measured rickets caused by calcium deficiency. Rickets seems to improve more rapidly with calcium 1000 mg compared to calcium 500 mg. However, increasing the calcium dose to 2000 mg daily is not more beneficial than calcium 1000 mg daily (98904).
• Tooth retention. Oral calcium with vitamin D seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral calcium does not seem to be beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Although some population research disagrees (15631,39041,95811,107237), most research shows that increased calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (15631,16715,98895,107236,107237). Subgroup analyses of population research suggest that calcium intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, adults (15631,107237). Another subgroup analysis in a large meta-analysis of population research also suggests that dietary intake may reduce estrogen receptor(ER)-negative breast cancer, but not ER-positive breast cancer (107236). However, most other research has not evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation or intake on breast cancer subtypes. The best evidence to date, from a large scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years after menopause does not reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer at the end of the study and 5 years after the end of the intervention (16715,98895).
• Fractures. Although oral calcium prevents fractures in osteoporosis, most evidence shows that calcium does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis discussion for more information on the use of calcium for this purpose. Details: The most recent and robust meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium supplementation with or without vitamin D is NOT associated with reduced fractures in older adults without osteoporosis (95822). A large-scale study in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years suggests calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D 400 IU daily for 7 years only modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) and does not significantly reduce fracture risk. This lack of effect may have been due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. In those who were 80% adherent, the combination of calcium plus vitamin D reduced the risk of hip fracture by about 29% (14282). Also, some clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 5 years does not attenuate loss of height after menopause when compared with placebo (95810). Additional meta-analyses of clinical and observational evidence suggest that calcium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, such as hip fractures (38589,38888,98895). Some other research has suggested that calcium in combination with vitamin D reduces fracture risk in older patients without osteoporosis (980,1836,8818,12930,12933,12952,38849,102145,107235); however, this research is confounded by a number of variables, including the presence of hormonal therapy and differing levels of fracture risk at baseline (1836,8818,95822). Conflicting findings on this topic might also be due to genetic differences in patient populations. A population analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study found that, in older females with the lowest genetic susceptibility to low bone mineral density (BMD), taking calcium with vitamin D is associated with a reduction in fracture risk. However, in females with a higher genetic susceptibility to low BMD, there is no association between supplementation and fracture risk. This might be because individuals with a lower susceptibility to low BMD are also more responsive to calcium and vitamin D supplementation (97357). As of April 2018, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with vitamin D >400 IU daily along with calcium >1000 mg daily is safe and effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture. USPSTF recommends against supplementing with calcium 1000 mg daily or less along with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal females (95695).
• Obesity. Oral calcium does not seem to improve weight loss. Details: Observational research has found that adults and children with low calcium intake are more likely to gain weight, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and be overweight or obese when compared to people with high calcium intake (12124,12125,12126,12127,14265). Additional observational research has found that increasing calcium intake is associated with weight loss in females; the results in males have been conflicting (12127,15602,15603). Despite these findings from observational research and a few small clinical studies (12128,15397,14438,98905), most clinical research has found that increased calcium intake does not increase weight loss (12052,13138,15396,15399,38985,39004,97356). The most recent meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies shows that daily dietary and supplemental calcium intake that meets the dietary reference intake (DRI) of 1000 mg or more daily does not increase weight loss in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when compared with intake below the DRI (95813). An older meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials also shows that increased dietary and supplemental calcium intake does not increase weight loss (15605).
• Overall mortality. Oral calcium does not seem to reduce overall mortality. Details: While some population research has found that calcium taken in combination with vitamin D in older females is associated with a lower risk of death (97353), most evidence shows that calcium, with or without vitamin D, has no effect on all-cause mortality (93533,97308).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral calcium does not reduce the risk of developing CVD and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Clinical research shows that calcium does not decrease CVD risk. Several separate meta-analyses of clinical and population research involving over 50,000 patients show that taking calcium 600-1200 mg daily for up to 7 years does not reduce the risk of CVD-related outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or overall mortality (39018,91350,92994,93533,97308,98902,107231,107233). No association was found between total dietary or supplemental calcium intake with or without vitamin D and the risk of CVD or mortality (91350,93533,97308). In fact, some population and clinical research has found that when calcium is used alone or with vitamin D, there is an INCREASED risk of CVD and coronary heart disease (38077,107233). However, other clinical research disagrees (93533). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease by 1.1-1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Intravenous calcium does not prevent nerve pain in patients given oxaliplatin. Oral calcium has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: While pooled analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials suggest that calcium and magnesium infusion decreases the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials shows that the infusion has no effect in preventing neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). Additionally, clinical trials show that administering calcium gluconate 1 gram with magnesium sulfate 1 gram intravenously immediately before, or before and after, the administration of a single oxaliplatin cycle (90005), or over the entire 6-cycle course of oxaliplatin, does not improve symptoms of neurotoxicity when compared with placebo (96474).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral calcium does not prevent MI. When taken in the absence of vitamin D, oral calcium may increase the risk of MI. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of calcium is associated with a decreased risk of MI (91350). However, a 2010 meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking calcium at a dose of at least 500 mg daily is associated with an approximate 30% INCREASE in the risk of MI in patients over the age of 40. According to this analysis, one additional case of MI will occur for every 69 patients that take calcium for 5 years (17482). A more recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of MI by 1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research studied postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233) In contrast, other meta-analyses of clinical research have shown that taking calcium for up to 7 years is NOT associated with an increased risk of MI, including a meta-analysis that only included postmenopausal females (93533,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI in postmenopausal females (93533). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for alcohol use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 800 mg and vitamin D 200 IU orally daily for 14 days modestly reduces alcohol craving scores and withdrawal scores when compared with placebo in adults with alcohol dependence that are undergoing withdrawal. Taking calcium carbonate did not reduce the need for diazepam; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (107234).
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for atherosclerosis. Details: A population study has found that taking calcium 1.2 grams daily for 3 years has no effect on carotid intima thickness or carotid atherosclerosis incidence. A total calcium intake (dietary and supplemental) of at least 1794 mg daily in older females may be associated with a decreased risk of carotid atherosclerosis when compared with a total calcium intake below 1010 mg daily (97351).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the odds of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. Details: A small observational study found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a 52% reduced odds of an autism spectrum disorder in the offspring (98900).
• Cancer. Oral calcium alone does not seem to prevent cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Taking calcium alone does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of cancer (12118,15629). The role of calcium in cancer prevention when taken along with vitamin D is controversial, as conflicting results exist. One clinical trial shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1400-1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1100 IU daily have a 60% lower relative risk for developing cancer of any type. Approximately 25 postmenopausal females would need to take this combination for 4 years to prevent one occurrence of cancer (15629). However, a more recent clinical study shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of cancer at 4 years (93943). Reasons for the disparate results are not entirely clear. The discrepancies do not appear to be related to baseline vitamin D levels or different study populations. It is possible that, given the 10-year time lapse between the two publications, the discrepancies result from differences in cancer detection capability. Also, since cancer risk was a secondary outcome measure in the earlier study and a primary outcome measure in the more recent study, it is possible that the discrepancies result from differences in statistical methodologies. The effect of vitamin D and calcium on cancer risk in males and younger patients is not known. There is also interest in using calcium for reducing the risk of hematological malignancies. An analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU for up to 10 years is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of hematologic malignancies when compared with placebo. However, no effect on hematologic malignancy related mortality was seen (97354).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between a higher dietary intake of calcium and the risk of depression when compared with a lower dietary intake of calcium (96480).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for type 2 diabetes prevention. Details: Some population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet or supplements, alone or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713,96473). However, population research is often limited by confounding variables. For example, one analysis found that any beneficial effect might be influenced by concomitant magnesium intake (96473). Furthermore, other population research has found that serum calcium levels higher than 9.6 mg/dL are associated with greater risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults with osteoporosis. This study is limited because it was not determined whether increased serum calcium was due to increased calcium intake or another factor such as parathyroid function (95815).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing pain associated with dysmenorrhea. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg with vitamin D 5000 IU daily for three menstrual cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (95821). However, calcium carbonate 1000 mg taken alone seems to reduce pain when compared with placebo.
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but dietary calcium does not seem to have any effect (38893).
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing falls. Details: Research suggests that calcium in combination with vitamin D, but not calcium alone, might prevent falls by decreasing body sway and normalizing systolic blood pressure (6362,11939,39038). Some experts think the combination of calcium and vitamin D may be important (11916). Preliminary clinical research in adults residing in a health care facility shows that taking vitamin D supplements while increasing dietary calcium and protein for 2 years reduces falls by 11% when compared with standard diets. Intervention diets were supplemented with milk, yogurt, and cheese to provide calcium 1142 mg and protein 69 grams daily (107235). There might also be different effects in females compared to males. In one study, females aged 65 years or older who took vitamin D 700 IU plus calcium citrate 500 mg daily over a 3-year period had a 46% lower risk of falling. However, this combination did not decrease falls in males (14291).
• Fluorosis. Oral calcium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking calcium orally, in combination with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and vitamin D, seems to be effective for reducing excessive fluoride levels in children and improving symptoms of fluorosis in children aged 6-12 years (990).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral calcium in combination with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing heart failure. Details: Based on a secondary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), taking calcium 1000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily does not reduce the risk of heart failure in the overall population or in individuals at high risk. However, in a subgroup of postmenopausal females without risk factors for heart failure, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of developing heart failure by about 37% (97307).
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for hypercholesterolemia. Details: Some evidence shows that taking calcium carbonate 400 mg three times daily reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4% and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 4% after 6 weeks of treatment when used in combination with a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) (2557). In contrast, a study in females with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 800 mg daily for 2 years might INCREASE total cholesterol levels by about 12 mg/dL when compared with placebo. This same study showed an association between calcium supplementation and an increase in total cholesterol levels and carotid intimal thickness in postmenopausal females, but not premenopausal females (97350). A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials which included both healthy patients and patients with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily and vitamin D 200-7142 IU daily modestly improves HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplementation is more effective in patients with dyslipidemia at baseline. It is unclear if this effect is due to calcium, vitamin D, or the combination (107227). However, other research shows that taking a specific supplement containing calcium 600 mg plus vitamin D 200 IU (Caltrate 600 D, Wyeth Consumer Healthcare Inc.) twice daily in combination with calorie restriction does not reduce total or LDL cholesterol levels when compared with placebo (15601).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing blood levels of lead. Details: Lead is mobilized along with calcium from bone during pregnancy and lactation, resulting in increased serum concentrations of lead. One clinical study suggests that calcium supplementation does not significantly decrease these elevated lead concentrations (1586). However, another clinical study suggests that taking calcium reduces blood lead levels by 11% when compared with placebo, with greatest effects observed in those with high baseline levels of lead (38957).
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral calcium for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of calcium for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium alone or with vitamin D is beneficial for metabolic syndrome prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet and supplements alone, or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713).
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing nephrotic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium 500-1000 mg daily for 3 months in combination with vitamin D3 60,000 IU daily or weekly for 4 weeks has no effect on bone mineral density or the risk of relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (97355).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking calcium alone or with vitamin D3 1000 IU daily reduced the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but had no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma (104622).
• Oral mucositis. When used in combination with fluoride treatments, a calcium phosphate mouth rinse seems to prevent and reduce mucositis-related pain in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that using a particular mouth rinse (Caphosol, EUSA Pharma) containing calcium phosphate, in combination with fluoride treatments, reduces days of mucositis, the duration of pain, and the dose and days of morphine used when compared with placebo and fluoride treatment (38611).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: An older meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (38792). However, a more recent pooled analysis of 15 cohort and case-control studies has found that the highest intake of dietary or dairy calcium is associated with a 20% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared to the lowest intake (97349).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing postpartum depression risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium 2 grams daily beginning at 11-21 weeks gestation reduces depression at 12 weeks postpartum when compared with placebo. However, no benefit is seen at 6 weeks postpartum (39447).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing leg cramps during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking calcium 1 gram twice daily (as a mixture of salts) for 2 weeks can reduce pregnancy-related leg cramps during the second half of pregnancy when compared with no treatment (2567).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily might decrease the risk of developing prostate cancer (14133). However, some epidemiological research suggests that consuming very high doses of calcium, over 2000 mg daily, might actually increase the risk of developing prostate cancer (14134). Some epidemiological research also suggests that doses greater than 1500 mg daily increase the risk of poorly differentiated, clinically advanced, and fatal prostate cancer (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer (98894). However, contradictory research suggests that there is no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall risk of prostate cancer (14131,14132,104630).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Some population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke (4822,38678). However, other population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is not associated with a decreased risk of stroke (91350). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years does not affect the risk of stroke when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females, and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Vertigo. Oral calcium with vitamin D might reduce positional vertigo; the effect of calcium when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking calcium 500 mg and vitamin D 400 IU twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate calcium for these uses.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Taking oral choline before exercise does not improve athletic performance. Details: Clinical research in trained athletes shows that taking oral choline 2.43 grams as a single dose does not delay fatigue during endurance sports when compared with placebo (5164). Other clinical research in untrained adults shows that taking oral choline 8.425 grams or 50 mg/kg once prior to participating in exhaustive, load-carrying exercise does not improve dexterity, upper or lower body strength, grip strength, or run time-to-exhaustion following exercise when compared with placebo (42229,42237).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial in patients with age-related cognitive decline. Details: Small clinical studies in adults with memory loss shows that taking choline 2 grams four times daily orally for 21 days does not improve memory when compared with placebo (5170). Observational research in adults over 60 years of age has found that intake of choline 187-399.5 mg daily is associated with a 33% to 42% reduced odds of low cognitive function when compared with intake of less than 187 mg daily. Intake of more than 399.5 mg daily was not associated with low cognitive function when compared with less than 187 mg daily (109100).
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial in patients with allergic rhinitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking oral choline, as tricholine citrate, 500 mg three times daily for 8 weeks is less effective than intranasal budesonide 200 mcg twice daily for reducing symptoms of allergic rhinitis (42252).
• Alzheimer disease. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for Alzheimer disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Asthma. Small clinical studies suggest that oral choline may modestly improve symptoms in patients with asthma. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking choline 500-1000 mg orally three times daily for 3-4 months decreases the severity of symptoms, the number of symptomatic days, and the need to use bronchodilators in patients with asthma when compared with placebo (5165,5166). Preliminary data also shows that choline 3 grams daily might be more effective than 1.5 grams daily (5165).
• Autism spectrum disorder. Oral choline has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of donepezil 2.5-5 mg daily and choline bitartrate 350 mg daily for 12 weeks improves receptive language skills, but no other outcomes, for up to 6 months after treatment when compared with placebo in children aged 5-10 years with autism spectrum disorder. Also, adolescents aged 11-16 years experienced no benefits, and some experienced an increase in behavioral symptoms, such as irritability (103571). It is unclear if this effect is due to choline, donepezil, or the combination.
• Breast Cancer. It is unclear if dietary intake of choline reduces the risk of breast cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 low to moderate-quality observational studies suggests that neither high nor low dietary intake of choline is associated with breast cancer risk. This finding is largely influenced by inclusion of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition (EPIC) cohort study, which analyzed data from over 300,000 subjects. However, subanalysis of 3 case-control studies suggests that high dietary intake of choline may be associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer when compared with low choline intake (111416). The interpretation of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies, self-reported data, and a small number of studies.
• Bronchitis. Although there has been interest in using oral and inhaled choline for bronchitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Cancer. It is unclear if dietary choline intake reduces the risk for cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of 11 low-quality population studies has found that high dietary intake of choline is associated with an 18% lower risk of cancer when compared with low choline intake. High dietary intake of both choline and betaine was associated with a 40% lower risk of cancer (97390).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if dietary choline intake reduces the risk of CVD or improves outcomes in patients with CVD. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that high intake of dietary choline is not associated with a lower risk of coronary artery disease, stroke, or mortality when compared with a diet low in choline (97388). A more recent population study has found that energy-adjusted total choline intake is not associated with the incidence of CVD over ten years. However, the highest intake of free choline is associated with a 34% reduced risk of CVD when compared with the lowest intake (109104).
• Cerebellar ataxia. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial in patients with cerebellar ataxia. Details: Despite some anecdotal reports suggesting that taking choline improves motor function, preliminary clinical research shows that taking choline 4-5 grams orally daily for 4 days to 6 weeks does not reduce cerebellar ataxia (5161,5173,23679).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial for improving cognitive function in healthy adults. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of choline 50 mg/kg orally prior to participating in an exhaustive, load-carrying task does not improve reaction time, reasoning, memory, or serial addition and subtraction ability following the task when compared with placebo (42237). Also, preliminary clinical research in patients requiring long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN) shows that adding choline chloride 2 grams daily to TPN for 24 weeks might improve delayed visual memory, but does not improve other measures of cognitive performance, when compared with TPN alone (42232).
• Cirrhosis. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for cirrhosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Complex partial seizures. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for complex partial seizures, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Dementia. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for dementia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of depression. Details: Observational research has found that dietary choline intake of at least 198 mg daily is associated with a 32% to 43% decreased risk of depressive symptoms when compared with intakes of less than 198 mg daily (109106). It is unclear if choline supplementation is beneficial for depression.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of type 2 diabetes; the available research is conflicting. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking oral choline bitartrate 1000 mg daily for 2 months does not affect coagulation parameters or levels of triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes (103569). Choline has also been evaluated for the prevention of type 2 diabetes. In Finnish males, observational research has found that dietary intake of total choline at levels of more than 482 mg daily, especially as phosphatidylcholine, is associated with a 25% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes over the following 19.3 years when compared with intakes of less than 382 mg daily (103567). However, in males and females in the US, additional observational research has found no association between dietary choline and risk of type 2 diabetes over a mean of 9 years (103570). In addition, a sub-analysis found that the highest intakes of choline (a median of 487 mg daily) were associated with a 54% higher risk of type 2 diabetes among females, but not males, when compared with the lowest intakes (a median of 175 mg daily) (103570). Population research in patients with diabetes has found that an intake of dietary choline in amounts of at least 279 mg daily is associated with a 2.1-fold increased odds of diabetic retinopathy in females, but not males, when compared with an intake less than 206 mg daily (109102). It is unclear if choline itself is responsible for the increased odds of diabetic retinopathy in this population.
• Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). It is unclear if oral choline improves cognition in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). Details: Clinical research in children aged 2.5-5 years with FASD shows that taking oral choline bitartrate, providing choline 500 mg, daily for 9 months does not improve global cognitive development or hippocampal-dependent memory when compared with placebo. However, a subgroup analysis of only children aged 2.5-4 years suggests that choline may improve hippocampal-dependent memory (92112). Follow-up of this study at 7 years shows that choline improves motor speed and suggests a trend towards improved color naming, which are components of executive functioning testing, when compared with placebo (111745). The validity of these findings is limited by the high rate of patient discontinuation which limits statistical power. A small clinical trial in children 5-10 years old with FASD shows that taking oral glycerophosphocholine, providing choline 625 mg, daily for 6 weeks does not improve cognitive function, executive function, attention, or hyperactivity when compared with placebo (97389).
• Hepatitis. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for hepatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Huntington disease. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for Huntington disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of hypertension. Details: Population research has found that every 100-mg increase in daily dietary choline intake is associated with a 15% decreased risk of developing hypertension over the next 4.6 to 9.1 years (109098). However, it is unclear if any benefits are specifically related to dietary choline or whether choline supplementation is beneficial.
• Infant development. It is unclear if oral choline intake during pregnancy is beneficial for infant development; the available research is conflicting. Details: Two observational studies have found that higher intake of choline during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy is associated with improvement in offspring cognitive development and visual memory at the age of 18 months and 7 years, respectively, when compared with lower choline intake (94654,94657). One of these studies found that each 1 mcmol/L increase in maternal blood levels of choline at 16 weeks' gestation was associated with a 2.23-point increase in cognitive skill score based on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-III) at 18 months of age (94657). Also, some observational research has found that higher plasma levels of choline during pregnancy are associated with higher processing speed and decreased social withdrawal at 4 years of age in the offspring (109101). In contrast, 3 observational studies have found that higher intake of choline during pregnancy, as well as higher maternal and cord blood levels of choline, are not associated with improved offspring intelligence at 5 years of age or cognitive performance at 3 or 7 years of age (94654,94655,94656). However, many of these observational studies, including those with positive findings, included populations with a mean intake of choline that was below the recommended adequate intake of 450 mg daily (94654,94656). It's possible that higher intake of choline is needed to observe a benefit; however, research on the effects of choline supplementation is limited. One small clinical trial shows that taking choline 930 mg daily during the third trimester modestly improves sustained attention in the child at 7 years of age when compared with taking 480 mg daily (109105).
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial in patients with metabolic syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with metabolic syndrome shows that taking oral choline 400 mg daily for 4 weeks does not decrease body weight, blood pressure, plasma glucose levels, or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, or increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, when compared with baseline (105731).
• Neural tube birth defects. It is unclear if oral choline intake is beneficial for preventing neural tube defects. Details: Population research has found that females who have a high dietary choline intake around the time of conception have a lower risk of having offspring with a neural tube defect when compared to those with lower intake (13134).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Details: A cross-sectional analysis of results from observational and clinical research shows that low dietary intake of choline is associated with increased fibrosis in postmenopausal adults with NAFLD, but not in children, males, or premenopausal adults with NAFLD. Dietary choline intake was not associated with steatosis severity in any patient subgroup (92109).
• Schizophrenia. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for schizophrenia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Tourette syndrome. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for Tourette syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• TPN-associated hepatic steatosis. It is unclear if intravenous choline is beneficial in patients with TPN-associated hepatic steatosis. Details: In patients receiving long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN), plasma levels of choline can decrease. Small, low-quality clinical studies show that administering intravenous choline 1-4 grams daily for 24 weeks improves some markers of TPN-associated hepatic steatosis when compared with baseline or placebo (5174,42235). More evidence is needed to rate choline for these uses.

(Read more about CHOLINE)

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Alzheimer disease. Lecithin does not improve daily functioning in patients with Alzheimer disease. Details: In patients with Alzheimer disease, taking various types of lecithin, 1.2-45 grams daily for up to 6 months, alone or in combination with various conventional medications, does not improve cognitive function or other measures of disease progression (5149,5151,5152,5156,14817,14823,14825,14837,14838).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral lecithin can slow age-related cognitive decline. Details: A small clinical crossover study in healthy adults aged 64 years and older shows that taking lecithin 26 grams orally daily, alone or in combination with physostigmine, for 5 weeks does not seem to improve memory when compared with placebo (19204).
• Anxiety. Although there is interest in using oral lecithin for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lecithin for this condition.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Although there is interest in using oral lecithin for atopic dermatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lecithin for this condition.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A clinical study in six patients with mania shows that taking lecithin 10 mg three times daily improves symptoms of delusions, incoherent speech, and hallucinations when compared with placebo (14839).
• Dry skin. Although there is interest in using topical lecithin for dry skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lecithin for this condition.
• Friedreich ataxia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral lecithin is not beneficial in people with Friedreich ataxia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking lecithin 25 grams orally daily for 1 month does not have any benefit in people with Friedreich ataxia (59298). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking lecithin for a longer period of 6 months also does not improve performance (19211).
• Hyperlipidemia. Although lecithin may lower cholesterol in healthy people, it does not seem to improve cholesterol levels in people with hyperlipidemia. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking lecithin 20-30 grams daily for up to 11 months decreases cholesterol in healthy people (5147,14820). However, other clinical research shows that lecithin has no effect on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or total cholesterol levels in people with hyperlipidemia (5148,14820).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial in patients with Parkinson disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with Parkinson disease shows that taking lecithin 32 grams daily for 8 weeks does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (19212).
• Postoperative pain. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial for reducing postoperative pain. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking lecithin 20 grams prior to surgery increases choline levels, but does not reduce postoperative pain after gynecological surgery, when compared with placebo (91231).
• Tardive dyskinesia. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial in patients with tardive dyskinesia. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with tardive dyskinesia shows that taking lecithin orally for 2 months, alone or in combination with lithium, does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (14822,14824).
• TPN-associated hepatic steatosis. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial in patients with hepatic steatosis associated with long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Details: A small clinical study in patients on long-term TPN with low choline levels suggests that taking lecithin 20 grams orally twice daily for 6 weeks reduces the degree of hepatic steatosis, compared with no significant changes in those taking placebo (5140).
• Ulcerative colitis. Oral lecithin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a disease-specific medical food (Profermin, Nordisk Rebalance) containing lecithin, fermented oats, barley malt, and lactobacillus plantarum, as 250 mL twice daily for 24 weeks, decreases disease activity by over 56% when compared with baseline and leads to remission in 46% of patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (91228). Other preliminary clinical research in this population shows that taking Profermin 250 mL twice daily for 8 weeks improves disease activity and remission rate when compared with another medical food (Fresubin Original, Fresenius Kabi) (90271). The effects of lecithin alone are unclear. More evidence is needed to rate lecithin for these uses.

(Read more about LECITHIN)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Ulcerative colitis. Limited clinical research shows that taking phosphatidylcholine products may improve clinical and remission scores in adults with ulcerative colitis. Details: Clinical research suggests that taking slow-release, phosphatidylcholine-rich phospholipids (Sterpur P-30 Granulat, Stern-Lecithin and Soja GmbH) improves symptoms and remission rate in patients with ulcerative colitis (68839,93389,93390,105728). A pooled analysis of 3 small randomized clinical trials in adults with chronic, active, ulcerative colitis at a single site shows that taking this specific form of phosphatidylcholine 1-4 grams daily for 3 months increases the odds of achieving clinical remission by 9.7 times when compared with placebo. Overall, 49% of the patients taking phosphatidylcholine achieved clinical remission. Taking phosphatidylcholine also improved quality of life and clinical improvement scores. In one study, this product also decreased the need for steroids, resulting in complete withdrawal of steroid therapy without exacerbation of disease in 80% of patients (93390). However, most patients in these studies were not treated with other standard therapies for ulcerative colitis, such as immunosuppressants and aminosalicylic acids. Subgroup analyses by dose suggest that the effective dose of this product is at least 1 gram daily; however, taking 3-4 grams daily may be more effective (93389,105728). In patients not responsive to mesalamine, some preliminary clinical research suggests taking LT-02 (Lipid Therapeutics GmbH), a modified-release formula of phosphatidylcholine, 3.2 grams daily for 12 weeks, improves symptoms of ulcerative colitis. Overall disease activity was improved by 52%, compared with 33% in those taking placebo. The effects on remission rate and mucosal healing were unclear; however, response rates were increased from 60% in the placebo group to 83% in the phosphatidylcholine group. In an 8-week follow-up, relapse was also less likely in patients treated with this product (93387).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Topical phosphatidylcholine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a topical cream containing niacinamide and linoleic acid-rich phosphatidylcholine (4% niacinamide-phospholipidic; N-PHCL emulsion) once daily for 12 weeks improves skin hydration and reduce acne lesions and inflammation when compared with a 1% clindamycin cream or a carrier-only cream in patients 15 years and older with moderate acne (93388).
• Aging. Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for aging, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Alcohol-related liver disease. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with alcohol-related liver disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with acute alcoholic hepatitis shows that taking polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine 6 grams orally daily for 24 months does not increase survival when compared with placebo (68843).
• Alzheimer disease. Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for Alzheimer disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Angina. Although there has been interest in using intravenous phosphatidylcholine for angina, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Anxiety. Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Atherosclerosis. Although there has been interest in using intravenous phosphatidylcholine for atherosclerosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for atopic dermatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Bipolar disorder. Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for bipolar disorder, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with dementia. Details: Population research in a sample of 1259 men in Finland suggests that high daily intake of phosphatidylcholine is associated with a 28% lower risk of developing dementia when compared with low daily intake, over a mean follow-up of about 22 years (103178).
• Fatty deposits. It is unclear if subcutaneous phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with fatty deposits. Details: Very low quality clinical research shows that administering subcutaneous injections of phosphatidylcholine 125 mg-250 mg every 7-15 days can reduce localized fatty deposits on the chin, thigh, hips, abdomen, back, neck, and elsewhere, based on subjective visual assessments, when compared with baseline (15621,15625,15627). Improvements appear to last for 2-3 years or longer (15621,15627). In one study, phosphatidylcholine injections markedly or moderately reduce localized fatty deposits on the face in about 80% of patients for a period of up to 3 years based on subjective patient self-assessment (15621).
• Hepatic encephalopathy. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with hepatic encephalopathy. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine 1050 mg daily for 6-8 weeks, either orally or through a nasogastric tube, does not improve recovery from encephalopathy compared with control in patients with acute or subacute liver failure. However, polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine seems to reduce mortality compared to control in patients with subacute, but not acute, liver failure (68835).
• Hepatitis A. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with hepatitis A. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 900 mg orally daily for 12 weeks does not seem to reduce serum bilirubin or liver enzyme levels in patients with hepatitis A when compared with no intervention (5225).
• Hepatitis B. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with hepatitis B. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing interferon treatment for hepatitis B shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 1.8 grams orally daily for 24 weeks improves clinical response when compared with placebo (5226). Other preliminary clinical research in patients with chronic active hepatitis B shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 3 grams orally improves histological disease scores when compared with control (5224).
• Hepatitis C. Oral phosphatidylcholine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing interferon treatment for hepatitis C shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 1.8 grams orally daily for 24 weeks improves clinical response when compared with placebo (5226).
• Hypercholesterolemia. Although there has been interest in using intravenous phosphatidylcholine for hypercholesterolemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Hyperlipidemia. Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for hyperlipidemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Hyperlipoproteinemia. Oral phosphatidylcholine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine 1.8 grams daily for 28 days in combination with clofibrate does not significantly reduce total cholesterol, triglycerides, or phospholipids compared to clofibrate alone in patients with primary hyperlipoproteinemia of Fredrickson Types II or IV. However, taking the combination of polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine plus clofibrate seems to significantly attenuate the relative increase in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when compared with clofibrate alone (68840).
• Infant development. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial for infant development. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking phosphatidylcholine (PhosChol, Nutrasal) 5 grams daily, containing choline 750 mg daily, from 18 weeks' gestation to 90 days postpartum does not improve cognitive function in the infant at 10-12 months of age when compared with corn oil placebo (93386).
• Lipoma. It is unclear if subcutaneous phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with lipoma. Details: An anecdotal report suggests that injecting a phosphatidylcholine solution directly into a lipoma can shrink the tumor by about 35%. However, in this report a major inflammatory reaction occurred, resulting in undesirable fibrotic changes to the tissue and eventual surgical excision of the lipoma (15622).
• Memory. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial for memory. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of phosphatidylcholine 25 grams (PC-55, TwinLab) orally can improve some measures of memory in healthy college students when compared with placebo (5228).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with NAFLD. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 600 mg orally three times daily for 24 weeks qualitatively improves liver echogenicity and structure on an ultrasound scan, suggesting a reduction in hepatic steatosis, when compared to baseline. There is also a small decrease in liver function test values, but with considerable variability both at baseline and at 24 weeks (103176,103177). Preliminary clinical evidence also suggests that taking a combination of the milk thistle constituent silybin, phosphatidylcholine, and vitamin E (Realsil, Instituto Biochimico Italiano) orally twice daily for 12 months improves liver function tests (LFTs) and liver histology when compared with placebo in people with NAFLD (63244). It is unclear if this effect is due to phosphatidylcholine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Periorbital fat pad herniation. It is unclear if subcutaneous phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with periorbital fat pad herniation. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that injecting phosphatidylcholine 20 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks markedly reduces lower eyelid fat pads in people with bulging fat pads due to herniation when compared to baseline. In some people, benefits appeared to last for a period of 9 months to 2 years or longer (15623,15628).
• Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for PAD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Peritoneal dialysis. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with peritoneal dialysis. Details: Very preliminary clinical research shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 900 mg orally daily for 8 weeks does not improve ultrafiltration in peritoneal dialysis when compared to baseline (5222).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for PMS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Tardive dyskinesia. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with tardive dyskinesia. Details: Preliminary clinical research taking phosphatidylcholine 30 grams orally daily for 6 weeks does not improve tardive dyskinesia symptoms when compared with placebo (5223). More evidence is needed to rate phosphatidylcholine for these uses.

(Read more about PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE)

EFFECTIVE

• Hypokalemia. Oral or intravenous potassium can treat and prevent hypokalemia. Details: Administering potassium orally or intravenously is effective for treating and preventing hypokalemia (15,107970). Oral potassium 20 mEq (780 mg of elemental potassium) is typically taken once daily to prevent hypokalemia (15,95010). Oral potassium 40-100 mEq (1560-3900 mg of elemental potassium) is typically taken in 2-5 divided doses daily to treat hypokalemia (95010). Doses should be limited to 40 mEq (1560 mg of elemental potassium), and the total dose should not exceed 200 mEq (7800 mg of elemental potassium) in 24 hours (95010). Potassium supplementation and route of administration should be individualized based on serum potassium level and patient status (15,107970).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Hypertension. Oral potassium, via dietary intake or supplementation, reduces blood pressure. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary potassium consumption is associated with a lower risk of developing hypertension (1310,8817,69512). Additionally, most clinical research shows that potassium, taken orally as part of the diet or as a supplement, reduces systolic blood pressure by about 3-9.5 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by about 2-6.4 mmHg in patients with or without hypertension (3385,92104,92106,95624,107974). In most of these studies, daily intake of potassium typically ranged from about 1500-7800 mg, with the most common intake being about 2340-2540 mg daily (92104,95624). However, some research shows that taking potassium does not lower systolic or diastolic blood pressure (69541,69550,107966). Differences in the patient populations, potassium intake, and salt intake could have contributed to the conflicting results. Potassium seems to be more effective for people with hypertension, low potassium levels, high daily sodium intake, and for Black adults (3384,3385,3386,92104,92106). Some research also shows that the greatest blood pressure-lowering effects of potassium occur at doses of about 3900-7800 mg daily (95624). A meta-analysis of clinical trials using a novel computational technique to assess both potassium intake and excretion suggests that the optimal blood pressure reduction occurs when taking about 1500 mg supplemental potassium daily or an overall intake of 4500-6500 mg potassium daily (105448). This analysis is limited by the heterogeneity and short duration of the included trials. There is also interest in utilizing low-sodium, high-potassium food substitutes to treat hypertension. Research shows that using salt substitutes containing 25% to 30% potassium chloride reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 3-4.6 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, when compared with regular table salt (107971,107976). In 2017, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) published guidelines recommending that patients with hypertension consume 3500-5000 mg of potassium daily (95680). This intake of potassium is expected to lower systolic blood pressure by about 4-5 mmHg in patients with hypertension and by about 2 mmHg in normotensive patients (3385). Although potassium supplements and dietary potassium both seem to be beneficial, the guidelines recommend getting potassium from dietary sources, since potassium-rich diets are usually heart-healthy (95680). Additionally, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Oral prescription potassium citrate reduces the risk of kidney stone recurrence. It is unclear if non-prescription potassium citrate would be beneficial. Details: The American Urological Association (AUA) recommends potassium citrate therapy for patients with recurrent calcium stones and low urinary citrate, those with recurrent calcium or calcium oxalate stones without current metabolic abnormalities, and those with uric acid or cystine stones. The citrate component reduces urine calcium excretion and increases urine citrate and urine pH, which in turn alleviates crystal growth, formation, and aggregation. Sodium citrate may also be used to prevent stone recurrence; however, due to sodium's propensity to increase urine calcium excretion, potassium citrate remains the preferred salt formulation (107972). It is important to note that potassium citrate supplements are not equivalent to prescription potassium citrate products. Dose and duration of treatment is determined by a healthcare professional and individualized based on a patient's urinary citrate levels (107975,107989). Serum potassium levels should be monitored prior to starting potassium citrate, within 2 weeks of treatment initiation, and every 12 months (107975).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Eating foods high in potassium and low in sodium might reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. It is unclear if taking potassium supplements has the same benefit. Details: Large population studies in adults without prior CVD have found that higher dietary potassium intake is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events (109395,109399). One study found that daily potassium intake of about 3300 mg is associated with a 13% reduction in CVD risk when compared with intake of about 1920 mg (109399). The other study found that each additional 1000 mg of daily urinary potassium excretion, which is a marker of dietary intake, is associated with an 18% reduction in CVD risk (109395). Another observational study in over 15,000 adults with history of stroke or hypertension shows that replacing regular table salt with a substitute product containing 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride for an average of 5 years decreases the rate of stroke, major cardiovascular events, or death (107976). High quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this association. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).
• Stroke. Eating foods high in potassium and low in sodium might reduce the risk of stroke. It is unclear if taking potassium supplements has the same benefit. Details: Higher dietary intake of potassium seems to be associated with a lower risk of stroke. Population research has found that increasing dietary potassium intake by 1-1.5 grams daily is associated with up to a 20% reduced risk of stroke (92105,92107). Some population research has found that higher supplemental intake of potassium is associated with a 29% reduced risk of ischemic stroke. However, supplemental potassium intake is not found to be associated with a lower risk of hemorrhagic or total stroke (92107). An observational study in over 15,000 adults with history of stroke or hypertension shows that replacing regular table salt with a substitute product containing 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride for an average of 5 years decreases the rate of stroke, major cardiovascular events, or death (107976). High quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this association. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Dental hypersensitivity. It is unclear if topical potassium improves dental hypersensitivity. Details: One meta-analysis of clinical research shows that using a dentifrice containing 5% potassium nitrite reduces dentin sensitivity when compared with a dentifrice that does not contain potassium nitrite (69549). Other clinical research published in a systematic review shows that potassium-containing toothpastes might reduce dentin sensitivity more than controls that do not contain potassium. However, these toothpastes might be less effective than other active toothpastes, such as those containing sodium monofluorophosphate, and the effect may result from a placebo effect, since the mechanism of action of potassium is unclear (69456).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if increasing dietary potassium reduces the risk of diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of 7 large population studies has found that consuming dietary potassium 3300-3500 mg daily is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of diabetes when compared with consumption below 1000 mg daily. Results were similar when studies that measured potassium intake with a dietary questionnaire were analyzed separately from those that measured intake based on urinary potassium excretion (110776). However, the validity of this finding is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies. Furthermore, despite use of data from various databases, most studies included in the analysis were conducted by the same author.
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral potassium improves glycemic control in prediabetes. Details: A small clinical study in Black patients with prediabetes shows that taking extended-release potassium (Klor-Con M10, Cardinal Health) 40 mEq daily as potassium chloride for 3 months does not improve glucose tolerance when compared with placebo. Although fasting glucose levels were slightly reduced in the potassium group when compared with placebo, both groups experienced a worsening of glucose intolerance, with no change in insulin levels or glycated hemoglobin (98533).
• Osteoporosis. Although there is interest in using oral potassium for osteoporosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of potassium for this condition.
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral potassium improves physical performance in older adults. Details: Observational research in older adults has found that decreased dietary potassium intake and increased dietary sodium intake over 5 years is associated with worsened physical performance (105450).
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral potassium is beneficial in patients with SLE. Details: Observational research in patients with SLE has found that increased dietary potassium intake is not associated with improvements in disease activity scores or markers of cardiovascular disease, including lipid levels and blood pressure, when compared with low dietary potassium intake. However, higher potassium intake does seem to reduce the odds of having elevated levels of C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation, in these patients (109397). More evidence is needed to rate potassium for these uses.

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (7555,12928,12946,95817). However, excessive doses should be avoided. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: Age 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51+ years, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stone, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). Also, advise patients taking calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D (93533).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. The National Academy of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51 years and older, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients to not consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). Also, advise patients taking calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D (93533).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (17506).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (945,1586,3263,3264,17506). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prescribing oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancy to those with low dietary calcium intake to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the same daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age independent of pregnancy status: 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg (17506). Doses over these amounts might increase the risk of neonatal hypocalcemia-induced seizures possibly caused by transient neonatal hypoparathyroidism in the setting of excessive calcium supplementation during pregnancy, especially during the third trimester. Neonatal hypocalcemia is a risk factor for neonatal seizures (97345).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Choline is safe in adults when taken in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 3.5 grams daily (3094) ...when used intravenously and appropriately. Intravenous choline 1-4 grams daily for up to 24 weeks has been used with apparent safety (5173,5174).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in doses above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 3. 5 grams daily. Higher doses can increase the risk of adverse effects (3094).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (3094). Choline is safe in children when taken in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL), which is 1 gram daily for children 1-8 years of age, 2 grams daily for children 9-13 years of age, and 3 grams daily for children 14-18 years of age (3094).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in doses above the UL. High doses can increase the risk of adverse effects (3094).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Choline is safe when taken in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL), which is 3 grams daily during pregnancy and lactation in those up to 18 years of age and 3.5 grams daily for those 19 years and older (3094,92114). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of choline used in higher doses during pregnancy and lactation.

(Read more about CHOLINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Lecithin has Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) status in the US (2619,105544). ...when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts. Lecithin has been used safely in doses of up to 30 grams daily for up to 6 weeks (5140,5149,5152,5156,14817,14822,14838,19212). ...when used topically (4914).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in food amounts. Lecithin has Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) status in the US (105544). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of medicinal amounts of lecithin during pregnancy or lactation; avoid using.

(Read more about LECITHIN)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Large doses up to 30 grams per day for 6 weeks (5223) and smaller doses of up to 6 grams daily for up to 24 months have been well tolerated (68839,68843,105728). ...when used subcutaneously and appropriately, short-term. Some research suggests that subcutaneous injections of 0.2 mL to 5 mL of a 5% phosphatidylcholine solution do not cause significant serious adverse effects when doses are administered up to five times and spaced apart by 2-4 weeks (15621,15623,15624,15625). ...when used topically as an emulsion also containing niacinamide for up to 12 weeks (93388).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally from 18 weeks of gestation at doses of up to 5 grams daily (93386)

LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in doses up to 100 mEq total potassium daily, not to exceed 200 mEq in a 24-hour period (95010,107989). Oral potassium chloride and potassium citrate are FDA-approved prescription products (95010,107989). Larger doses increase the risk of hyperkalemia (15). ...when administered intravenously (IV) at appropriate infusion rates (95011). Parenteral potassium is an FDA-approved prescription product (15,95011). A tolerable upper intake level (UL) for potassium has not been established; however, potassium levels should be monitored in individuals at increased risk for hyperkalemia, such as those with kidney disease, heart failure, and adrenal insufficiency (100310,107966).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in dietary amounts. A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for healthy individuals (6243,100310).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in dietary amounts of 40-80 mEq daily (15). A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for healthy individuals (100310).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

ALUMINUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium citrate might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity. Other types of calcium do not increase aluminum absorption.  Details Calcium citrate can increase the absorption of aluminum when taken with aluminum hydroxide. The increase in aluminum levels may become toxic, particularly in individuals with kidney disease (21631). However, the effect of calcium citrate on aluminum absorption is due to the citrate anion rather than calcium cation. Calcium acetate does not appear to increase aluminum absorption (93006).

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.  Details Advise patients to take bisphosphonates at least 30 minutes before calcium, but preferably at a different time of day. Calcium supplements decrease absorption of bisphosphonates (12937).

CALCIPOTRIENE (Dovonex) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Taking calcipotriene with calcium might increase the risk for hypercalcemia.  Details Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (12938). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with calcium supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Intravenous calcium may decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers; oral calcium is unlikely to have this effect.  Details Intravenous calcium is used to decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers in the management of overdose. Intravenous calcium gluconate has been used before intravenous verapamil (Isoptin) to prevent or reduce the hypotensive effects without affecting the antiarrhythmic effects (6124). But there is no evidence that dietary or supplemental calcium when taken orally interacts with calcium channel blockers (12939,12947).

CEFTRIAXONE (Rocephin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Co-administration of intravenous calcium and ceftriaxone can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys.  Details Avoid administering intravenous calcium in any form, such as parenteral nutrition or Lactated Ringers, within 48 hours of intravenous ceftriaxone. Case reports in neonates show that administering intravenous ceftriaxone and calcium can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys. In several cases, neonates have died as a result of this interaction (15794,21632). So far there are no reports in adults; however, there is still concern that this interaction might occur in adults.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Using intravenous calcium with digoxin might increase the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias.  Details Hypercalcemia increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with digoxin (12940). However, one retrospective analysis of clinical data suggests that intravenous calcium does not increase the risk of dysrhythmias or mortality in patients receiving digoxin (38960).

DILTIAZEM (Cardizem, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, calcium might increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of diltiazem.

DOLUTEGRAVIR (Tivicay) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of dolutegravir.  Details Advise patients to take dolutegravir either 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium carbonate 1200 mg concomitantly with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces plasma levels of dolutegravir by almost 40%. Calcium appears to decrease levels of dolutegravir through chelation (93578).

ELVITEGRAVIR (Vitekta) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of elvitegravir.  Details Advise patients to take elvitegravir either 2 hours before or 2 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium along with elvitegravir can reduce blood levels of elvitegravir through chelation (94166).

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption and effectiveness of levothyroxine.  Details Advise patients to take levothyroxine and calcium supplements at least 4 hours apart. Calcium reduces levothyroxine absorption, probably by forming insoluble complexes (5082). Calcium carbonate supplements reduce effectiveness of levothyroxine in patients with hypothyroidism (5081,5082,6137).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use of calcium and lithium may increase this risk of hypercalcemia.  Details Clinical research suggests that long-term use of lithium may cause hypercalcemia in 10% to 60% of patients (38953). Theoretically, concomitant use of lithium and calcium supplements may further increase this risk.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of quinolone antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral quinolones at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements or calcium-fortified foods. Taking calcium at the same time as oral quinolones can reduce quinolone absorption. Calcium binds to quinolones in the gut (4412,10339,21638,38570).

RALTEGRAVIR (Isentress) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium may reduce levels of raltegravir.  Details Pharmacokinetic research shows that taking a single dose of calcium carbonate 3000 mg along with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily modestly decreases the mean area under the curve of raltegravir, but the decrease does not necessitate a dose adjustment of raltegravir (94164). However, a case of elevated HIV-1 RNA levels and documented resistance to raltegravir has been reported for a patient taking calcium carbonate 1 gram three times daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU three times daily in combination with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 11 months. It is thought that calcium reduced raltegravir levels by chelation, leading to treatment failure (94165).

SOTALOL (Betapace) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of sotalol.  Details Advise patients to separate doses by at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium. Calcium appears to reduce the absorption of sotalol, probably by forming insoluble complexes (10018).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral tetracyclines at least 2 hours before, or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements. Taking calcium at the same time as oral tetracyclines can reduce tetracycline absorption. Calcium binds to tetracyclines in the gut (1843).

THIAZIDE DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Taking calcium along with thiazides might increase the risk of hypercalcemia and renal failure.  Details Thiazides reduce calcium excretion by the kidneys (1902). Using thiazides along with moderately large amounts of calcium carbonate increases the risk of milk-alkali syndrome (hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis, renal failure). Patients may need to have their serum calcium levels and/or parathyroid function monitored regularly.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, use of calcium supplements may increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of verapamil.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

ATROPINE Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, choline might decrease the effects of atropine in the brain.  Details Animal research shows that administering choline one hour before administering atropine can attenuate atropine-induced decreases in brain levels of acetylcholine (42240). Theoretically, concomitant use of choline and atropine may decrease the effects of atropine.

(Read more about CHOLINE)

(Read more about LECITHIN)

(Read more about PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE)

ACE INHIBITORS (ACEIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Using ACEIs with high doses of potassium increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details ACEIs block the actions of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and reduce potassium excretion (95628). Concomitant use of these drugs with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15,23207). However, concomitant use of these drugs with moderate dietary potassium intake (about 3775-5200 mg daily) does not increase serum potassium levels (95628).

ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKERS (ARBs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Using ARBs with high doses of potassium increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details ARBs block the actions of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and reduce potassium excretion (95628). Concomitant use of these drugs with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15,23207). However, concomitant use of these drugs with moderate dietary potassium intake (about 3775-5200 mg daily) does not increase serum potassium levels (95628).

POTASSIUM-SPARING DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Concomitant use increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details Using potassium-sparing diuretics with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

General ...Orally and intravenously, calcium is well-tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Belching, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, and stomach upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about calciphylaxis and kidney stones.

Cardiovascular ...There has been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these results, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and CVD, CHD, or MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482). To minimize the possible risk of CVD, CHD, or MI, advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). While dietary intake of calcium is preferred over supplemental intake, advise patients who require calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D, as this combination does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI (93533).
Rarely, calcium intake can increase the risk of calciphylaxis, which usually occurs in patients with kidney failure. Calciphylaxis is the deposition of calcium phosphate in arterioles, which causes skin ulcers and skin necrosis. In a case report, a 64-year-old female with a history of neck fracture, sepsis, and ischemic colitis presented with painful leg ulcers due to calciphylaxis. She discontinued calcium and vitamin D supplementation and was treated with sodium thiosulfate and supportive care (95816).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, calcium can cause belching, flatulence, nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, and diarrhea (1824,1843,12950,38803). Although constipation is frequently cited as an adverse effect of calcium, there is no scientific substantiation of this side effect (1824,1843,1844,1845,12950,38978). Calcium carbonate has been reported to cause acid rebound, but this is controversial (12935,12936).

Oncologic ...There is some concern that very high doses of calcium might increase the risk of prostate cancer. Some epidemiological evidence suggests that consuming over 2000 mg/day of dietary calcium might increase the risk for prostate cancer (4825,12949). Additional research suggests that calcium intake over 1500 mg/day might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer and prostate cancer mortality (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a small increase in prostate cancer risk (98894). However, contradictory research suggests no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall prostate cancer risk (14131,14132,104630). More evidence is needed to determine the effect of calcium, if any, on prostate cancer risk.

Renal ...Kidney stones have been reported in individuals taking calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily in combination with vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 4 years (93943).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

General ...Orally, choline is well tolerated when used appropriately. Adverse effects have been reported with doses exceeding the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 3.5 grams daily.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Fishy body odor. At high doses of at least 9 grams daily, choline has been reported to cause diarrhea, nausea, salivation, sweating, and vomiting.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, doses of choline greater than 7. 5 grams daily may cause low blood pressure (94648).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, large doses of choline can cause nausea, vomiting, salivation, and anorexia (42275,91231). Gastrointestinal discomfort has reportedly occurred with doses of 9 grams daily, while gastroenteritis has reportedly occurred with doses of 32 grams daily (42291,42310). Doses of lecithin 100 grams standardized to 3.5% choline have reportedly caused diarrhea and fecal incontinence (42312).

Genitourinary ...Orally, large doses of choline greater than 9 grams daily have been reported to cause urinary incontinence (42291).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, high intake of choline may cause sweating due to peripheral cholinergic effects (42275).

Oncologic ...In one population study, consuming large amounts of choline was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer in females, even after adjusting for red meat intake (14845). However, more research is needed to confirm this finding.

Psychiatric ...Orally, large doses of choline (9 grams daily) have been associated with onset of depression in patients taking neuroleptics. Further research is needed to clarify this finding (42270).

Other ...Orally, choline intake may cause a fishy body odor due to intestinal metabolism of choline to trimethylamine (42285,42275,42310,92111,92112).

(Read more about CHOLINE)

General ...Orally, lecithin is well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, diarrhea, fullness, and nausea.

Dermatologic ...Orally, lecithin can cause allergic skin reactions in people with egg or soy allergies (15705).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, lecithin may cause abdominal pain, diarrhea, fullness, and nausea (5140,6243,14817,14822,14838,19204,59281).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, lecithin caused CNS complaints and agitation in one patient in a clinical trial (59261).

(Read more about LECITHIN)

General ...Phosphatidylcholine is generally well tolerated when used orally, subcutaneously, or topically.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Altered taste, bloating, diarrhea, itching, nausea, sweating, vomiting.
Subcutaneously: Bruising, burning, edema, erythema, hematoma, itching, pain at the injection site.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Subcutaneously: Lipoma.

Dermatologic ...When taken orally, phosphatidylcholine may increase sweating (5229) and itching (63244). When given subcutaneously, phosphatidylcholine can cause pain, burning, itching, tenderness to touch, bruising, edema, and erythema at the injection site. The pain, itching and erythema usually resolve within 2 days of treatment; however localized tenderness can last longer (15623,15624,15626,15627,15628). Edema and bruising usually resolve within 10 days of treatment (15621,15623,15625). Some people can also develop nodules or hematoma at the injection site. This usually resolves within 30 days (15627).

Gastrointestinal ...Ingesting large amounts of phosphatidylcholine (30 grams per day) can cause gastrointestinal upset and diarrhea (5223). However, bloating, diarrhea, altered taste, nausea, and vomiting have been reported with smaller doses (63244,68843,93389,93390,105728). Although moderate subcutaneous doses do not usually cause systemic side effects, high doses exceeding 1.2 grams of phosphatidylcholine can cause nausea and abdominal pain in some people (15624).

Musculoskeletal ...Injecting phosphatidylcholine directly into a lipoma can result in a significant inflammatory response and undesirable fibrotic tissue changes (15622).

(Read more about PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE)

General ...Orally or intravenously, potassium is generally well-tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, belching, diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, and vomiting.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
All ROAs: High potassium levels can cause arrhythmia, heart block, hypotension, and mental confusion.

Cardiovascular ...Orally or intravenously, high potassium levels can cause hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, heart block, or cardiac arrest (15,16,3385,95011,95626,95630).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally or intravenously, high doses of potassium can cause, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and flatulence (95010,95011). Bleeding duodenal ulcers have also been associated with ingestion of slow-release potassium tablets (69625,69672).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally or intravenously, high potassium levels can cause paresthesia, generalized weakness, flaccid paralysis, listlessness, vertigo, or mental confusion (15,16,3385,95011).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)