Nature's Way Kids Multi by PharmaCare Laboratories Pty Ltd

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Biotin deficiency. Oral and injectable biotin prevents and treats biotin deficiency. Details: Biotin up to 10 mg daily has been used to treat and prevent biotin deficiency. Injections of biotin 150 mcg daily for 3-5 days have been used in adults. Biotin deficiency might occur due to different etiologies such as inherited biotinidase deficiency, malnutrition, chronic use of anticonvulsants, pregnancy, and excessive and chronic raw egg consumption (6243,19347). A very small study in newborns aged 1-6 months shows that adding biotin to infant formula safely improves biotin status in formula-fed infants (111365). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of blinding, no randomization, and the small sample size.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Multiple sclerosis (MS). In spite of contrary reports, high-dose biotin (300 mg daily) does not reduce disability in patients with progressive MS. It also does not seem to be linked to an increased risk for relapse. Details: Although most earlier research suggested benefit, the highest quality evidence shows that high-dose biotin does not improve outcomes in progressive MS (95662,102963,102966,104011). A large multi-centered randomized clinical trial (SPI2) in patients with progressive MS and high disability shows that taking biotin 100 mg three times daily for 15 months does not improve disability, as measured on the expanded disability status scale (EDSS), or 25-foot walking time, when compared with placebo. The SPI2 clinical trial also did not find that biotin increases the rate of relapse (104011), a concern raised in one observational study of high-dose biotin (104000). Also, a large observational study of adults with progressive MS failed to identity an increase in annualized relapse rates in patients that reported taking biotin when compared with controls (105716). Other observational research has also found no effect on the relapse risk (102963,102964). There is some speculation that any increased rate of relapse identified in some high-dose biotin cohorts might be due to detection bias or reduced compliance with disease-modifying therapies.
• Seborrheic dermatitis. Oral biotin doesn't seem to improve seborrheic dermatitis of infancy. Details: A clinical trial in infants with seborrheic dermatitis shows that biotin given by mouth does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (8469).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alopecia areata. It is unclear if oral biotin is beneficial for alopecia areata. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults with alopecia areata shows that weekly injections of intramuscular biotin 5 mg/1 mL and dexpanthenol 250 mg/2 mL for 6 weeks reduces hair fall count and transiently increases hair density compared with baseline (111366). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of a placebo control group, small sample size, and short duration of treatment. It is unclear if the effects are due to biotin, dexpanthenol, or the combination. Another small clinical study in 9-year-old children with alopecia areata shows that taking biotin 20 mg with zinc aspartate 100 mg orally along with topical application of clobetasol propionate 0.025% daily for one year promotes hair regrowth in 33% of children, compared with 0% in the group receiving the steroid deflazacort (6932). It is unclear if these effects are due to biotin, zinc, topical clobetasol, or the combination.
• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). Although there is interest in using oral biotin for ALS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of biotin for this condition.
• Biotin-thiamine-responsive basal ganglia disease. Adding oral biotin to oral thiamine does not seem to improve most symptoms associated with this condition, although it may slightly speed recovery from acute crisis in children. Details: A small case series in children ages 1-12 years with biotin-thiamine-responsive basal ganglia disease has found that adding biotin 5 mg/kg daily to thiamine 40 mg/kg daily for 30 months is not associated with additional symptomatic improvement in encephalopathy, seizures, dystonia, or other neurologic sequelae when compared with taking only thiamine. However, taking biotin with thiamine is associated with a 1-day reduction in recovery from acute crisis when compared with thiamine alone (95661).
• Brittle nails. Low quality clinical studies suggest that oral biotin might improve nail thickness and prevent the splitting of brittle nails. Details: Some small, low quality clinical studies in people with brittle nails shows that taking biotin 2.5 mg orally daily for 1.5 to 15 months increases nail thickness and decreases the splitting of fingernails and toenails in some people when compared with baseline (171,35593). The validity of these findings is limited by the small study sizes and the lack of a comparator group.
• Depression. Although there is interest in using oral biotin for mild depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of biotin for this condition.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral biotin is beneficial for type 2 diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials shows that taking biotin 1.5-15 mg orally daily for 1-3 months does not improve fasting blood glucose or serum insulin levels when compared with placebo. However, the validity of these results is limited by inclusion of subjects with and without diabetes (110044). A very small study in adults with type 2 diabetes also shows that taking biotin 5 mg three times daily for 28 days does not affect glucose or insulin levels when compared to baseline (11579). Biotin has also been studied in combination with other ingredients. Preliminary clinical research shows that a taking a specific supplement containing a combination of biotin 2 mg and chromium picolinate 600 mcg (Diachrome, Nutrition 21) can lower blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes who are poorly controlled on oral hypoglycemic drugs (12385,12390,15169). It is unclear if these effects are due to biotin, chromium, or the combination.
• Diabetic neuropathy. Although there is interest in using oral and intramuscular biotin for diabetic neuropathy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of biotin for this condition.
• Muscle cramps. It is unclear if biotin is beneficial for improving muscle cramps in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Details: Patients undergoing hemodialysis are prone to muscle cramps. A small clinical study in patients with hemodialysis-related muscle cramps shows that taking biotin 1 mg in the morning daily for at least one week prevents and reduces severity of muscle cramps when compared to baseline. Cessation of biotin led to recurrence of cramps, and restarting oral biotin led to resolution of cramps during hemodialysis (89475). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of comparator group. More evidence is needed to rate biotin for these uses.

(Read more about BIOTIN)

EFFECTIVE

• Folate deficiency. Oral or intravenous folic acid is effective for the prevention or treatment of folate deficiency. Details: Administering folic acid orally or parenterally improves and prevents folate deficiency (505,8739). Clinical research shows that supplementation with folic acid 100 mcg to 5 mg daily during pregnancy decreases the risk of developing megaloblastic anemia by up to 79% (91307).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Kidney failure. Taking folic acid orally reduces homocysteine levels in people with kidney failure who are on hemodialysis. Details: Over 85% of people with kidney failure have hyperhomocysteinemia. Treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia in kidney failure is often more difficult than with normal kidney function (1489,3324,7289,9413,9414,9416). The reasons for this are not fully understood; renal uptake and metabolism of homocysteine may be reduced in severe kidney failure, and hemodialysis may contribute to vitamin deficiencies (6884,9414,9417). Folic acid 0.8-15 mg daily or 3 times weekly is generally used, but the degree of homocysteine reduction varies between 12% to 50%, and normal homocysteine levels (less than 12 µmol/L) cannot always be achieved. Adding vitamin B12 400-1000 mcg daily and vitamin B6 20-50 mg daily produces an additional reduction in homocysteine (1489,6884,7289,7881,9322,9413,9414,9415,9416,9417). Folic acid doses greater than 15 mg daily do not seem to provide additional benefit. Also, doses of 30-60 mg might cause a rebound in homocysteine levels when treatment is stopped (9219). Despite the homocysteine-lowering effect of folic acid in kidney failure, the most robust meta-analysis of 11 clinical trials suggests that folic acid supplementation does not seem to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events (50527). A smaller meta-analysis of 7 clinical trials that used a different primary composite outcome suggests that folic acid might reduce the risk of cardiovascular events by 15% when compared with control (91311). There has also been interest in using a reduced form of folic acid, L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (L-5-MTHF). One study in patients on hemodialysis suggests that taking L-5-MTHF 17 mg daily for 12 weeks might lower homocysteine levels to a greater extent than an equimolar 15 mg of folic acid (104908). Another clinical trial in patients on hemodialysis suggests that giving intravenous L-5-MTHF 50 mg three times weekly is associated with an increased survival of about 36 months, compared with about 26 months with folic acid 5 mg daily. There was no difference in homocysteine reduction between groups (104909). These results should be interpreted with caution because they have not been replicated, and there was no placebo control. Furthermore, survival may have been affected by the availability of kidney transplants.
• Hyperhomocysteinemia. Oral folic acid, taken alone or in combination with other B vitamins, lowers homocysteine levels in most patients. However, it is unclear if this has cardiovascular benefits. Details: Taking folic acid orally 0.4-5 mg daily lowers fasting homocysteine levels by 20% to 30% in people with normal to moderately elevated homocysteine levels at baseline. Folic acid 0.8-1 mg daily seems to provide maximal reduction (9307,9400,9401,9405,9408,11337,11338,50145). Doses above 1 mg daily do not seem to add benefit (9307), except in some people with certain gene mutations that cause homocysteine levels of 20 µmol/L or higher (9408). The higher the initial homocysteine levels, the lower the folic acid dose needed to attain maximum homocysteine reduction (9307). The effects of folic acid supplementation on homocysteine concentrations appear to be greater in females than males (50145). Adding vitamin B6 25-250 mg or vitamin B12 500 mcg seems to further reduce homocysteine levels (1489,9400,9405,9406,9408,107136). Some experts recommend routine use of vitamin B12 in homocysteine-lowering regimens to avoid the risk of neuropathy in people with undetected vitamin B12 deficiency (9405). Increasing folic acid intake with supplements or folate-fortified cereal products is more effective for reducing homocysteine levels than increasing intake of folate-rich foods (6367). Fortification of cereals and flour with 140 mcg folic acid per 100 grams reduces the mean homocysteine level in the general population by about 7% (7881,9404,9407). Elevated homocysteine levels are considered by some to be an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis progression, recurrent thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and other vascular complications (3886,3887,6236,7725,9314,9318,50509). However, elevated homocysteine levels may be a marker, as opposed to a cause, of vascular disease (11387,11388). Although folic acid lowers homocysteine levels, it is not yet known whether this reduces the risk of vascular disease. One meta-analysis shows that taking folic acid can reduce the risk of stroke by about 10% in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD); the reduction is greatest in patients for whom homocysteine levels are lowered by at least 25% (96157). A meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials, including over 44,000 patients at risk for or with a history of CVD, shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo (97619). Also, a meta-analysis in patients with a history of stroke shows that B vitamin supplementation, including folic acid, reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% and the risk of vascular death by 11% when compared with placebo (107136). However other research does not agree. Meta-analyses of clinical research show that folic acid does not prevent CVD or coronary heart disease, in spite of lowering homocysteine by up to 55%, when individuals with normal or high levels of homocysteine are considered (50539,96147,97619). Furthermore, most research shows that folic acid supplementation, alone or in combination with vitamin B6 and vitamin B12, does not improve endothelial function or improve secondary prevention of cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction in people with existing CVD despite a homocysteine-lowering effect (9313,11337,11387,13482,50437,97619). Some research even suggests an increase in CVD risk concurrent with homocysteine lowering (13482). Large randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm or refute these findings. Some researchers hypothesize that different genetic profiles might explain some of these conflicting results. For instance, individuals with a homozygous 677TT MTHFR genotype typically have increased homocysteine levels. However, a meta-analysis suggests that treatment with folic acid does not reduce the risk of ischemic heart disease despite reducing homocysteine levels in individuals with 677TT MTHFR (50456). It has also been theorized that a reduced form of folic acid, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) might work better in these individuals. Although [6RS]-5-MTHF has been shown to lower homocysteine levels (104915), studies assessing its cardiovascular benefits are lacking.
• Methotrexate toxicity. Oral folic acid reduces the severity of methotrexate toxicity. Details: Oral folic acid reduces methotrexate toxicity symptoms, such as nausea and vomiting, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriasis (768,2162,2163,2164,4492,4493,4494,9369,9419). Folic acid also seems to reduce methotrexate-induced hepatic side effects by approximately 36% (50320). Some research shows that a low, 0.8 mg weekly dose of folic acid is equally effective to a higher dose of 5 mg weekly for the prevention of methotrexate toxicity (102388).
• Neural tube birth defects. Oral folic acid helps to prevent neural tube birth defects in newborns. Details: Clinical practice guidelines recommend that anyone capable of becoming pregnant take folic acid 400 mcg daily from fortified foods or supplements to prevent neural tube birth defects in infants. Folic acid 600 mcg daily is advised during pregnancy (94811,96146). This recommendation is based on research showing that a higher intake of folic acid from food and supplements during pregnancy reduces the primary incidence of neural tube birth defects by 41% to 69% (3325,9309,50344,50403,50468,95156). Individuals with a history of children with neural tube birth defects usually take a higher dose of folic acid 4000 mcg daily starting one month before and continuing for up to 3 months after conception (96146). Evidence shows that, when used for secondary prevention, folic acid supplementation reduces the incidence of neural tube defects by 66% to 87% (21235,50263,50344,50403,95156). In the US, foods containing at least 60 mcg of folic acid can be labeled with a health claim stating that healthful diets with adequate folic acid intake may reduce the risk of having a child with a brain or spinal cord defect (102369).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cognitive impairment. Taking folic acid alone, with other B vitamins or with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), might improve thinking and memory skills in older patients with cognitive impairment. Details: One clinical trial in patients aged 65 years and older with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) shows that taking folic acid 400 mcg daily for 2 years increases IQ scores when compared with placebo (100952). Two small, low-quality clinical studies in patients aged 70-90 years with cognitive impairment and low folate levels or folate deficiency shows that taking folic acid 5 or 15 mg daily for up to 63 days improves cognitive function, including measures such as memory and attention, when compared with placebo or baseline (50301,104911). Folic acid also appears to be beneficial when used in combination with other B vitamins or with DHA. A clinical trial in patients aged 70 years and older with MCI shows that taking folic acid 800 mcg, vitamin B6 20 mg, and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily for 2 years mitigates decline in executive function and, in patients with high baseline homocysteine levels, improves cognition and memory when compared with placebo (50480). Taking folic acid 800 mcg with or without DHA 800 mg daily for 6 months modestly improves cognition, as measured on the full-scale intelligence quotient, when compared with placebo (103978,109196). However, this benefit is no longer present at 6 months after treatment discontinuation (109196).
• Depression. Oral folic acid seems to modestly reduce depression severity when added to conventional antidepressant therapy. It is unclear if folic acid can reduce the prevalence of depression or the risk for suicide. Details: Observational studies suggest that depression is correlated with low folate status, particularly in females (50105,50127,50243). Taking folic acid 0.2-15 mg daily for up to 6 months with conventional antidepressants seems to improve treatment response in patients with major depressive disorder (3657,10884,10887,50566,109190). One meta-analysis shows that taking L-methylfolate or folic acid as an adjunct to treatment with conventional antidepressants modestly reduces depression severity when compared with placebo and conventional antidepressants. The response and remission rates were improved by 36% and 39%, respectively (109190). However, limited clinical research suggests that folic acid is not effective as a replacement for conventional antidepressant therapy (10886). Also, a small clinical study in adolescents at high familial risk for mood disorders suggests that taking folic acid 2.5 mg daily for up to 36 months does not prevent mood disorders when compared with placebo. However, in the patients that were eventually diagnosed with depression, the time of onset was delayed from 5 months to 15.5 months in the group using folic acid when compared with placebo (91313). Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that folic acid is not currently recommended as monotherapy treatment for unipolar depression (110318). Observational research has also evaluated the association between folic acid supplementation and suicidal events in patients with or without depression. One within-person cohort study, in which only 12% of patients were diagnosed with depression, has found that filling a folic acid prescription of 0.4-5 mg daily, either alone or as part of a multivitamin, is associated with a reduced risk for suicidal events during the following months when compared with months without a prescription (109201). It is unclear what percentage of these patients, if any, had folate deficiency at baseline.
• Hypertension. Oral folic acid seems to modestly reduce hypertension. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking folic acid 5-10 mg daily for at least 6 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure by 2mmHg and improves flow-mediated dilation by 1.6% in hypertensive individuals (50364). Some research has evaluated folic acid in hypertensive patients when used with antihypertensive drugs. Results show that taking folic acid 400-800 mcg in combination with enalapril 10 mg daily for about 4.5 years does not improve blood pressure when compared with enalapril alone (50302,96158). However, in hypertensive patients with heavy proteinuria, this combination seems to reduce the risk of all-cause mortality by about 41% when compared with enalapril alone (96158).
• Phenytoin-induced gingival hyperplasia. Topical folic acid seems to reduce gingival hyperplasia due to phenytoin. The effect of oral folic acid is unclear. Details: Applying folic acid topically seems to inhibit gingival hyperplasia secondary to phenytoin therapy (2151). However, taking folic acid orally does not seem to improve gingival hyperplasia secondary to phenytoin therapy in adults (2150,2151,2152), although some evidence suggests that taking folic acid 500 mcg daily reduces the risk of phenytoin-induced gingival hyperplasia by 33% in children when compared with placebo (50463).
• Stroke. Although some clinical research has shown that oral folate reduces stroke risk by a small amount, more research is needed to determine who is most likely to benefit. Most individual clinical trials show that folic acid seems to reduce stroke risk only in regions without food-fortification policies. Details: Multiple clinical studies have shown that folic acid supplementation reduces the risk of stroke by 10% to 25% in regions WITHOUT established policies mandating folic acid fortification of grain products (50240,50485,50525,50539,91325,96154,96157,96159,97308). The effect appears to be greatest when folic acid is taken in low doses (usually 0.8 mg daily or lower) (50525,96157,96159), in regions with a low prevalence of statin use (50525,96159), in patients with high cholesterol levels at baseline (96152), in patients who achieve homocysteine reduction of at least 20% (50407,96157), and in patients with the lowest folate levels at baseline (96154,96157). There is also some evidence that the effect of folic acid on stroke risk is greatest in patients with low baseline levels of vitamin B12 (96159). In 2001, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368). Most research shows that folic acid supplementation does not reduce the risk of stroke in regions WITH established policies mandating folic acid fortification (50240,50485,50525,50539,96157,96159,97308). However, there is some evidence that folic acid may reduce the risk of stroke in patients from regions with folic acid fortification who have recently had a stroke or transient ischemic attack and are not using antiplatelet drugs (90379). Meta-analyses of clinical research have been conducted. However, possible confounding due to the presence or absence of folic acid fortification is unclear. A meta-analysis of the available research in adults with existing CVD shows that folic acid supplementation at a daily dose of less than 2 mg reduces the risk for stroke by about 10% (102386). Also, a meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials, including over 44,000 patients at risk for or with a history of CVD, shows that B vitamin supplementation, including folic acid, reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo (97619). In patients with a history of stroke, a meta-analysis shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% and the risk of vascular death by 11% when compared with placebo (107136). It is unclear if folic acid reduces the stroke risk in patients with impaired kidney function. Some research shows that taking folic acid in combination with high doses of vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) does not reduce the risk of stroke in these patients (11387,96150). However, there is concern that the lack of benefit may have been due to the decline in kidney function from high doses of cyanocobalamin (96150). Additional research is needed to determine if folic acid supplementation is beneficial in patients with impaired kidney function when used with other forms of vitamin B12 such as methylcobalamin or hydroxycobalamin.
• Vitiligo. Oral folic acid seems to improve vitiligo symptoms. Details: Taking folic acid orally seems to improve symptoms of vitiligo (2153,2154). This finding is supported by a meta-analysis of observational research which shows that patients with vitiligo have higher serum homocysteine levels when compared with patients without vitiligo (100951).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Anemia. Adding oral folic acid to oral iron therapy does not seem to improve hematologic parameters in patients with anemia. Details: In postpartum patients with anemia, clinical research shows that taking iron as ferrous fumarate 600 mg and folic acid 1 mg daily is no more effective than iron alone for improving hemoglobin status (91319). Also, clinical research in non-pregnant menstruating females shows that taking folic acid 0.4 mg daily or 2.8 mg once weekly for 16 weeks with iron 60 mg daily does not reduce anemia or improve iron status when compared with iron alone (109193). During pregnancy, clinical research shows that folic acid supplementation does not decrease the risk of pre-delivery anemia or low hemoglobin levels (91307).
• Age-related cognitive decline. Oral folic acid does not seem to prevent cognitive decline in healthy elderly adults. Details: Most clinical research shows that taking folic acid, alone or in combination with other B vitamins, does not improve cognitive function, including memory, language, or executive function, in elderly adults with age-related cognitive decline (50318,50412,50510). In fact, a large-scale observational study in the US has found that people over 65 years of age who consume large amounts of folic acid (median of 742 mcg daily) have cognitive decline at a rate twice as fast as those consuming smaller amounts (median of 186 mcg daily) (13068). While most research on folic acid for age-related cognitive decline lacks positive findings, many of the studies are small, short-term (<1 year), underpowered to detect significant differences, and not specific to patients with high homocysteine levels. Population research has found that high homocysteine levels are associated with decreased cognition in older adults, suggesting that using folic acid to lower homocysteine levels might mitigate cognitive decline in these patients (50094). Two long-term clinical trials examining the effects of folic acid in elderly adults with high homocysteine levels show mixed results. A large-scale clinical trial of patients aged 50-70 years from the Netherlands who have high homocysteine levels shows that taking folic acid 800 mcg daily for 3 years increases memory, information processing, and other measures of cognitive function when compared with placebo (15271). However, another large-scale clinical trial of patients aged 65 years and older from the Netherlands who have high homocysteine levels shows that taking folic acid 400 mcg and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily for 2 years lowers homocysteine levels, but does not appear to improve overall measures of cognitive function, when compared with placebo (90392). The reasons for the discrepant findings in these two studies are not clear but might relate to differences in the dose of folic acid, duration of treatment, and age of patients included.
• Cataracts. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce cataract development. Details: Clinical research in females with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or with risk factors for CVD shows that taking folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for an average of 7.3 years does not reduce the risk of developing cataracts. Furthermore, the risk of cataract extraction was increased by 28% in these patients (96149).
• Diarrhea. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of diarrhea, and might even increase the incidence of diarrhea in children. Details: In children aged 6-30 months at risk of malnourishment, clinical research shows that taking a nutritional supplement (Nutriset Ltd) enriched in folic acid 75-150 mcg, with or without vitamin B12 0.9-1.8 mcg, daily for 6 months does not reduce the incidence of diarrhea when compared with placebo. Enrichment with folic acid, with or without vitamin B12, actually seems to increase the likelihood of having more episodes of both persistent diarrhea and diarrhea lasting over 3 days (90391).
• Fall prevention. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of falls. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 400 mcg and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily, for 2 years, does not prevent falls when compared with placebo in elderly individuals also taking vitamin D (96148).
• Fetal and premature infant mortality. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem prevent mortality in premature infants. Details: Clinical research shows that supplementation with folic acid during pregnancy does not decrease the risk of miscarriage, stillbirth, or neonatal death (91307,96156).
• Leukemia. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to reduce the risk for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Details: A meta-analysis of results from two case-control studies has found that increased folate intake during pregnancy is not associated with a reduced risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (50247).
• Male infertility. Oral folic acid does not seem to improve sperm parameters or pregnancy rates in males with infertility. Details: Some small clinical studies show that taking folic acid, alone or with zinc, increases sperm count in males with idiopathic infertility or in males with a grade III varicocele (9334,90194). However, another small study in males with asthenozoospermia shows that taking folic acid 5 mg, selenium 200 mcg, and vitamin E 400 IU daily for 3 months does not improve sperm parameters when compared with placebo (104907). Furthermore, there seems to be no improvement in clinical outcomes. One large, high-quality clinical study in males with idiopathic infertility shows that taking folic acid 5 mg with zinc 30 mg daily for 6 months does not improve sperm morphology, pregnancy rate, or live birth rate when compared with placebo (102085). Folic acid has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A retrospective study in males with or without varicocele-related infertility suggests that taking a specific combination product containing folic acid 0.2 mg, vitamin C, zinc, L-carnitine fumarate, acetyl-L-carnitine, coenzyme Q10, selenium, and vitamin B12 (Proxeed Plus, Sigma-Tau) twice daily for 6 months is associated with improvements in sperm count, sperm concentration, and sperm motility when compared to baseline. Improvement in semen parameters were greatest in subjects with more severe varicoceles (111296). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Osteoporosis. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Details: Clinical research in elderly adults or adults with a history of cerebrovascular disease shows that taking vitamin B12 500 mcg and folic acid 0.4-2 mg, with or without vitamin B6 25 mg, daily for 2-3 years does not seem to reduce the risk for osteoporotic fractures when compared with placebo (90377,90393). A 5-7 year follow-up of this research has also found no benefit (103981).
• Physical performance. Oral folic acid does not seem to improve physical performance in older adults. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 400 mcg and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily for 2 years, does not improve hand strength or improve performance such as walking when compared with placebo in elderly individuals also taking vitamin D (96148).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral folic acid does not seem to prevent pre-eclampsia in pregnant patients. Details: While the effect of low-dose prenatal folic acid is unclear, high-dose folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia. Some population research has found that low-dose folic acid is associated with a 22% reduced odds of pre-eclampsia, while other research has found no association (91308,99370,99372,110447). A large clinical trial evaluating high-dose folic acid in pregnancies at risk for pre-eclampsia shows that taking 4 mg daily, starting at 8-16 weeks of gestation and continuing until delivery, does not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia when compared with placebo (103929). A secondary analysis of this study in twin pregnancies has also found no benefit with high-dose folic acid supplementation (103977).
• Respiratory tract infections. Oral folic acid does not seem to prevent respiratory tract infections. Details: Clinical research in children aged 6-30 months at risk of malnourishment shows that taking a nutritional supplement (Nutriset Ltd) enriched in folic acid 75-150 mcg, with or without vitamin B12 0.9-1.8 mcg, daily for 6 months does not reduce the incidence of lower respiratory infections when compared with a supplement not enriched with folic acid and vitamin B12 (90391).

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Colorectal adenoma. Oral folic acid does not prevent colorectal adenomas. Details: Although some population research and one clinical study has found that high folate intake is associated with reduced colorectal adenoma risk (2142,2143,91303), most clinical research does not support this finding. Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for up to 9.2 years, does not reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma in females at high risk of cardiovascular disease when compared with placebo (90389). Other clinical research suggests that taking folic acid does not reduce the occurrence or recurrence of adenomas or incidence of advanced adenomas (34596,50241,50265,50369,50394,50449,50522). Furthermore, treatment with folic acid for more than 3 years seems to be associated with an increased risk of advanced adenomatous lesions (50378).
• Fragile X syndrome. Oral folic acid does not improve symptoms in children with fragile X syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking folic acid orally does not improve symptoms of fragile X syndrome (2155,2156,2157,2158,2159,2160,50575).
• Preterm labor. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of preterm birth. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that supplementation with folic acid 200 mcg to 5 mg during pregnancy does not decrease the risk of preterm birth (91307,96155). An observational study in patients with and without epilepsy found that folic acid supplementation during pregnancy was associated with a lower odds of preterm birth in patients receiving antiseizure medications; however, no link between folic acid and preterm labor was reported in patients without epilepsy or in those with epilepsy not receiving antiseizure medications (110447).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Abdominal wall defects. It is unclear if oral folic acid helps to prevent abdominal wall defects in newborns. Details: Observational research in a population in northern China has found that taking folic acid supplements until the end of the first trimester modestly reduces the risk of abdominal wall defects and the risk of omphalocele, specifically, in the newborn when compared with not taking folic acid. However, this association was not found in a population in southern China (109191). These differing outcomes may be related to the lower dietary folate intakes in northern China.
• Acne. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults and children with inflammatory acne shows that taking 1-4 tablets of a specific product (NicAzel, Elorac Inc.) containing folic acid, vitamin B6, nicotinamide, azelaic acid, zinc, and copper for 8 weeks reduces inflammatory lesions and improves appearance in 88% and 81% of patients, respectively, when compared with baseline (90800).
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large-scale clinical study shows that taking folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily reduces the risk of developing AMD in females over 40 years of age with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or with risk factors for CVD. Those who took this combination for an average of 7.3 years had a 34% reduced risk of developing AMD and a 41% reduced risk of visually significant AMD when compared with placebo (14620). It is unclear if this effect is due to folic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Age-related testosterone deficiency. Folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in males with overweight or obesity, mild erectile dysfunction, and normal to low androgen levels shows that taking a combination product containing folic acid 400 mcg, alpha-lipoic acid, myo-inositol, and apple (Sinopol Forte) increases testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and measures of erectile dysfunction but not follicle-stimulating hormone or sperm parameters when compared to baseline (111674). The validity of these effects is limited by the small sample size and the lack of a comparator group, and it is unclear if these effects are due to folic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of developing this condition. Details: Low levels of folate and high levels of homocysteine have been linked to a greater risk of Alzheimer disease (50094). Also, some observational studies have found that higher intake of folate from the diet and supplements in elderly adults is associated with a reduced risk of developing Alzheimer disease when compared with lower intake (13165,15270). One small clinical trial in patients with Alzheimer disease who are taking cholinesterase inhibitors shows that taking folic acid 1 mg daily for 6 months increases the likelihood of treatment response, classified as global improvement in behavioral and/or functional status with no decline in mental status scores, by 78% to 87% when compared with placebo (50246). Also, preliminary clinical research in patients with probable Alzheimer disease who are not consuming a folate-fortified diet shows that taking vitamin B12 50 mcg daily plus folic acid 1.2 mg daily for 6 months modestly improves some measures of cognitive performance and decreases levels of homocysteine when compared with placebo (107150). However, not all research agrees. Clinical research in patients with probable Alzheimer disease using routine medications shows that taking folic acid 5 mg, vitamin B12 1 mg, and vitamin B6 25 mg daily for 18 months does not have a beneficial effect on cognitive function or the severity of disease when compared with placebo (50319). However, all patients in this study were also consuming a folate-fortified diet.
• Angioplasty. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Some evidence suggests that folic acid 1 mg, vitamin B12 400 mcg, and pyridoxine 10 mg daily can decrease the rate of restenosis in patients treated with balloon angioplasty (8009,9412). However, this combination does not seem to be as effective for reducing restenosis in patients after coronary stenting (8009). An intravenous loading dose of folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 followed by oral administration of folic acid 1.2 mg, vitamin B6 48 mg, and vitamin B12 60 mcg daily after bare metal coronary stenting also does not seem to reduce restenosis and might actually increase restenosis (12150,12151). Due to the lack of evidence of benefit and potential for harm, this combination of vitamins should not be recommended for patients receiving coronary stents (12151).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if oral folic acid during pregnancy reduces the risk of eczema in the child. Details: Observational research has found that consuming both iron and folic acid supplements during pregnancy is associated with a four-fold reduced risk for developing atopic dermatitis in the child. However, use of either iron or folic acid supplementation alone is not associated with an effect on the child's risk for atopic dermatitis (102387).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral folic acid intake during pregnancy reduces the risk of autism spectrum disorder in the child. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that consumption of folic acid of at least 400 mcg daily from both diet and supplements during pregnancy is associated with a 45% reduced risk of autism in the child at 2-15 years of age. Also, supplementation with folic acid during the prenatal to early period of pregnancy is associated with an approximate 43% reduced risk of autism in the child. This association did not differ between countries with or without a folate fortification program (109198). An individual population study has also found that prenatal folic acid supplementation initiated the first day of the last menstrual period before conception is associated with a 39% reduced odds of autism in the child at age 3.3-10.2 years when compared to pregnancies without folic acid supplementation (91324).
• Beta-thalassemia. There is limited evidence on the oral use of folic acid for beta-thalassemia minor. Details: Patients with beta-thalassemia minor may experience decreased muscle strength and increased bone or muscle pain. A small clinical study in children with this condition shows that taking folic acid 1 mg, with or without L-carnitine 50 mg/kg, daily for 3 months reduces bone pain by 64% to 84% and increases the number of stairs climbed by 2- to 5-fold when compared with baseline (90631). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if adding oral folic acid to conventional bipolar therapy further improves symptoms. Details: Some clinical evidence suggests that folic acid does not improve the antidepressant effects of lithium in patients with bipolar disorder (50566). However, other clinical evidence suggests that taking folic acid in combination with valproate during the acute phase of mania improves the effects of valproate (50357).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces breast cancer risk. Details: Some older population research suggests that increased intake or levels of folic acid alone does not affect the risk of breast cancer or breast cancer-related mortality (50218,50224). However, in a specific group of women who also consume high amounts of dietary methionine, cyanocobalamin (vitamin B12), or pyridoxine (vitamin B6), dietary intake of folate is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (9328,50224). Also, more recent population research has found that folic acid plus folate dietary intakes between 153-400 mcg are associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. This risk is further reduced in those who drink relatively large amounts of alcohol (90794). Folate intakes greater than 400 mcg daily do not appear to be protective against breast cancer (90794).
• Cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents cancer. Details: A large cohort study of children born to mothers with epilepsy on antiseizure medications suggests that prenatal folic acid exposure of 1 mg daily or more, at an average of 4.3 mg daily, is associated with a 2.7-fold greater risk of pediatric cancer when compared with children born to mothers with epilepsy but without prenatal exposure to high-dose folic acid. Additionally, this risk is not present in children of mothers without epilepsy taking high-dose folate (112103). It is unclear how maternal epilepsy, antiseizure medications, and folate interact to increase the risk of pediatric cancers. However, in the absence of clear guidelines, mothers with epilepsy should take no more than 4 mg of folic acid daily (112101,112102).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although oral folic acid does not seem to prevent most CVD events, some research suggests that increased dietary folic acid might lower the risk of stroke and CVD-related mortality in patients at high risk for CVD. Details: In 2001, prior to the publication of the highest quality research on this topic, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368). Meta-analyses of available research show that folic acid might lower the risk of stroke in patients with CVD (97619,102386,107136). Some clinical research shows that taking folic acid reduces the risk of CVD by 15% in patients with kidney failure or chronic kidney disease (50444,91311). However, most research shows that folic acid supplementation, alone or in combination with vitamin B6 and vitamin B12, does not improve endothelial function or reduce the risk of death or CVD events in patients with existing hyperhomocysteinemia, coronary heart disease, CVD, kidney disease, or prior stroke, despite having a homocysteine-lowering effect (9313,9322,11337,11387,13482,50437) (50512,50527,96154,96147,97619,102386). Some population research has evaluated adults at high risk for CVD. This research has found that dietary folate intake of at least 382 mcg daily is associated with a modest reduction in CVD-related mortality and possibly all-cause mortality. Consuming folic acid as a component of fortified food in doses of more than 251 mcg daily is associated with a modest reduction in CVD-related mortality. Conversely, folic acid supplementation is associated with a higher risk of CVD and overall mortality, and there is a J-shaped association between folate intake, serum folate levels, and red blood cell folate levels, with both CVD-related and all-cause mortality (109199).
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents cervical cancer. Details: Epidemiological evidence has found that increasing folate intake from dietary and supplement sources, along with thiamine, riboflavin, and vitamin B12, might decrease the risk of precancerous cervical lesions (11074).
• Child development. It is unclear if oral folic acid supplementation during pregnancy improves child development. Details: Clinical research in Northern Ireland shows that taking folic acid 400 mcg daily starting in the 14th week of gestation and continuing until the end of pregnancy improves word reasoning in the child at 7 years of age when compared with placebo. When compared with a historical cohort from Britain, folic acid supplementation was associated with an increase in full scale IQ, verbal IQ, performance IQ, and general language at 7 years of age (102385). At age 11, benefits in word reasoning were no longer significant. However, there were modest benefits in some measures of processing speed when compared with placebo. Verbal comprehension was modestly improved in females, but not males (109192). Observational research in pregnant individuals and their children in Spain has found that taking less than 400 mcg of folic acid daily during pregnancy is associated with lower mental alertness scores in children at ages 7-9 years when compared with folic acid 400-999 mcg daily, while taking folic acid 1000 mcg or more daily during pregnancy was associated with improvements in some measures of working memory in the children. However, no relationship between folic acid dosing and most other measures of cognitive function was identified (110449).
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there is interest in using oral or injectable folic acid for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of folic acid for this condition.
• Chronic kidney disease (CKD). While adding oral folic acid to enalapril might slow CKD progression, adding folic acid to high-dose vitamin B12 does not seem to be beneficial. Details: Clinical research in adults with hypertension and CKD shows that taking enalapril with folic acid 800 mcg for a median of 4.4 years reduces the risk of worsening kidney function by 21% and slows the rate of kidney function decline by 44% when compared with enalapril alone (96153). However, clinical research does not support the use of folic acid in patients with CKD when used in combination with high-dose vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin). Vitamin B12 might increase the risk of negative outcomes (50253,50409,96150). More research is needed to determine the benefits of folic acid when used alone.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents colorectal cancer. Details: Although the majority of population research suggests that taking folic acid orally from dietary and supplemental sources reduces the risk of colorectal cancer (505,2140,2144,2145,2250,6271,9325,9326,50109,50427,50450)(91306,91323,96160,109188,110450), clinical evidence in general is not supportive. Most clinical research and meta-analyses of clinical trials suggest that taking folic acid from dietary or supplemental sources does not reduce the risk of colorectal cancer (2141,34596,50394). The reason for this discrepancy is unclear. Some observational research suggests that an inverse association between folate intake and risk of colorectal cancer was not apparent until at least 12 years after baseline folate intake was determined (109188). A meta-analysis of observational studies suggests that the benefits of folic acid supplementation on colorectal cancer risk might be limited to patients with moderate to high alcohol consumption (110450). Other clinical evidence suggests that the beneficial effect of folic acid may be limited to colon, but not rectal, cancer (21501). Furthermore, the beneficial effect for colon cancer may be limited to only certain subtypes. For instance, females with folate intake of at least 400 mcg daily seem to have a 46% reduction in the risk of p53-overexpressing colon cancer, but not p53-negative tumors, when compared with those who consume less than 200 mcg daily (21300). Also, the source of folic acid may influence its effects. Some observational research suggests that dietary folate, but not folic acid supplementation, reduces the risk of colon cancer (21501).
• Congenital heart disease. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents congenital heart disease. Details: The exact cause of congenital heart disease is unknown but is thought to be a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Population research has found that supplementation with folic acid or folic acid-containing prenatal vitamins during pregnancy is associated with up to a 40% lower risk of congenital heart defects in newborns (99373).
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of dementia. Details: While some preliminary research shows that folic acid might aid in the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer disease (13165,15270,50246,90374), two small clinical trials show that taking folic acid 15-20 mg daily for 10-12 weeks does not seem to improve cognitive function or the severity of dementia in patients with various forms of dementia, including vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, probable Alzheimer disease, or dementia due to other causes (50062,50597).
• Diabetes. Small clinical studies suggest that oral folic acid does not improve glycemic control. Details: Meta-analyses of small clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes show that folic acid does not reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) when compared with placebo (50528,109197). Another small clinical study in patients with diabetes who are stabilized on metformin and/or a sulfonylurea shows that taking folic acid 5 mg daily for 8 weeks does not affect HbA1C when compared with placebo (104917). The validity of this study is limited by its small size and lack of blinding. Conversely, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking folate modestly reduces fasting blood glucose and insulin levels, as well as measures of insulin resistance, when compared with placebo or no intervention (109197). There was no clear relationship between these changes and the dose or duration of folate. However, the studies included in this analysis evaluated multiple patient populations; the effect of folate in patients with diabetes, specifically, is unclear. Beyond glycemic control, some research has assessed the impact of dietary folate intake on cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. An observational study in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes has found that dietary intake of folate in the highest quartile is associated with 68% lower odds of developing cardiovascular disease, defined as a non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina, when compared with folate intake in the lowest quartile (110452). Folic acid has also been evaluated in gestational diabetes. A meta-analysis of 20 studies shows that serum and red blood cell (RBC) folate levels are higher in patients with gestational diabetes than without gestational diabetes. Subgroup analysis suggests that patients with gestational diabetes have higher serum and RBC folate levels in the second trimester than in those without gestational diabetes, while RBC folate levels in patients with gestational diabetes were higher in the first trimester than those without gestational diabetes. Overall, higher serum folate levels are associated with a slight increase in the odds of gestational diabetes when compared with lower serum folate levels (112107).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with diabetic neuropathy shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid (L-methylfolate), vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin), and vitamin B6 (pyridoxal-5'-phosphate), for 24 weeks does not improve neural dysfunction based on vibration perception, but does seem to improve total neuropathy symptoms, when compared with placebo. These symptoms, which include both sensation and pain, decreased by 25% with the B vitamin combination, compared with only 15% in those taking placebo (90375).
• Epilepsy. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces seizure frequency. Details: A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research shows that taking folic acid does not reduce seizure frequency in patients with epilepsy (50124). However, there is some speculation that folate deficiency might be linked to increased seizure frequency. A preliminary clinical study in folate-deficient children with epilepsy shows that taking folic acid 5 mg daily for 3 months reduces seizure frequency when compared to baseline, but not when compared with a control group that is not deficient in folate (99371).
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in males with mild erectile dysfunction, overweight or obesity, and normal to low androgen levels shows that taking a combination product containing folic acid 400 mcg, alpha-lipoic acid, myo-inositol, and apple (Sinopol Forte, Laborest) improves measures of erectile dysfunction when compared to baseline (111674). The validity of these effects is limited by the small sample size and the lack of a comparator group, and it is unclear if these effects are due to folic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Esophageal cancer. Higher dietary folate intake is associated with a lower risk of esophageal cancer. Details: One meta-analysis of observational research has found that higher levels of dietary folate are associated with a 34% lower risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and a 50% lower risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma when compared with low levels of dietary folate (50208). Another meta-analysis of observational research has found that consuming high amounts of folate is associated with a 36% decrease in the odds of esophageal cancer when compared with lower dietary folate intake (100950).
• Fenofibrate (Tricor)-induced hyperhomocysteinemia. Folic acid seems to attenuate increases in homocysteine in people taking fenofibrate. Details: A small open-label clinical trial in patients taking fenofibrate shows that adding folic acid 10 mg every other day might reduce elevated plasma homocysteine levels by up to 59% when compared with taking fenofibrate alone (9321).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces gastric cancer risk. Details: Observational research has found that taking folic acid reduces the risk of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma by 17% and the risk of noncardia gastric cancer by 33%, but does not reduce the risk of gastric cancer overall (50208). Also, a meta-analysis of 13 small clinical studies in patients with gastric precancerous conditions shows that taking folic acid 20-30 mg daily for 3-6 months improves gastric mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia but does not seem to improve symptoms when compared with a control (110448). Whether these findings are associated with a lower risk of gastric cancer is unclear.
• Gout. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk for gout. Details: An observational study has found that increased dietary folate intake is associated with a lower incidence of gout (50454).
• Head and neck cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial for head and neck cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that the highest intake of dietary folate is associated with a 50% reduced risk of head and neck cancer when compared with the lowest intake of folate. Each 100 mcg increase per day seems to reduce the risk by about 4% (96151).
• Hearing loss. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents hearing loss. Details: Low levels of serum folate seem to be a risk factor for sudden sensorineural hearing loss in adults (21283). Observational research in females has found that serum folate levels in the lowest quintile are associated with a 19% increased risk for hearing loss when compared with levels in the second quintile. Also, folate levels in the highest quintile are associated with a 12% lower risk of hearing loss when compared with the second quintile (109807). A clinical study in older adults from the Netherlands shows that taking folic acid 800 mcg daily for 3 years slows the decline of age-related low-threshold hearing loss when compared with placebo (15163). However, at the time of this study, folate enrichment of foods was not allowed in the Netherlands. As a result, baseline folate levels in this study population were about 50% lower than in the US population. The effect of folic acid supplementation in people with higher baseline folate levels is unclear.
• Infertility. It is unclear if oral 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) in combination with vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 is more beneficial than folic acid alone for increasing pregnancy rate in females undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Details: Retrospective research from Italy suggests that taking 5-MTHF 400 mcg, vitamin B12 5 mcg, and vitamin B6 3 mg daily results in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates of approximately 60% and 49%, respectively, compared with 45% and 35% of those taking folic acid 400 mcg daily. A sub-analysis suggests that beneficial effects on pregnancy rates are limited to individuals aged less than 40 years (109189). The findings from this study are limited by its retrospective design. Also, it is unclear if these findings are generalizable to countries with folate fortification.
• Kidney failure. It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial in patients with kidney failure. Details: Because hemodialysis removes folate from the body, there is concern that folate deficiency may cause complications in patients with kidney failure receiving hemodialysis. Observational research in Taiwanese patients with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis has found that taking folic acid 5 mg daily for an average of 5.8 years is associated with a 31% lower risk of arteriovenous access thrombosis when compared with folic acid 5 mg weekly. However, daily folic acid supplementation was not linked to a lower risk of cardiovascular events, cancer, or mortality when compared with weekly folic acid (110120). Oral folic acid has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small, low-quality clinical study in adults with kidney failure undergoing regular hemodialysis shows that taking oral folic acid 30 mg daily with thiamine 90 mg daily for 96 weeks reduces overall mortality by 67% and improves cognitive scores by 31% when compared with no intervention (107724). It is unclear if these findings are due to folic acid, thiamine, or the combination.
• Lometrexol toxicity. While oral folic acid might reduce lometrexol toxicity, intravenous folic acid does not seem to help. Details: In a phase I trial, intravenous folic acid 5-25 mg administered 1 hour or 3 hours prior to lometrexol 15-30 mg/m2 every 3 weeks does not seem to reduce cumulative lometrexol toxicity (2161). However, in a phase II study, taking oral folic acid 3 mg/m2 daily in addition to lometrexol 10 mg/m2 weekly seems to attenuate cumulative toxicity and improve its tolerability in cancer patients (104948).
• Low birth weight. It is unclear if oral folic acid supplementation during pregnancy reduces the risk of a low birth weight. Details: Clinical research shows that supplementation with folic acid 200 mcg to 5 mg daily during pregnancy increases mean birth weight when compared with placebo (91307). Furthermore, some population research has found that pre- or peri-conception folic acid supplementation, usually 400 mcg daily, is associated with a reduced risk of a child born small-for-gestational age. However post-conception folic acid supplementation is not associated with reduced risk (91304,103983). An observational study in pregnant Chinese patients found that supplementation with folic acid is associated with a 20% lower odds of low birth weight when compared with no supplementation. This association was observed when folic acid was used both before conception and during pregnancy for at least 24 weeks or during pregnancy only for at least 12 weeks. Increased dietary folate intake was not linked to a lower risk of low-birth-weight infants (110446). However, other observational research has found no association between folic acid supplementation during pregnancy and the risk for small-for-gestational age births (110447).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces lung cancer risk. Details: There does not appear to be a relationship between deficiency of folate and lung cancer (9454). However, consuming at least 130.4 mcg of folate per 1000 kcal daily seems to reduce the risk of lung cancer by 40% in former smokers when compared to those with lower dietary folate intake (50065).
• Melanoma. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces melanoma risk. Details: Population research has found that folic acid supplementation of 2-2.5 mg daily in combination with vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 is linked with a 53% reduced risk of melanoma (91312).
• Metabolic syndrome. Although there is interest in using oral folic acid for metabolic syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of folic acid for this condition.
• Nitrate tolerance. It is unclear if oral folic acid helps to prevent the development of tolerance to treatment with nitroglycerin. Details: Some clinical evidence suggests that taking folic acid 1 mg daily for 1 week does not prevent the development of nitroglycerin-induced endothelial dysfunction or tolerance in healthy individuals (50442). However, other research suggests that taking folic acid 10 mg daily for 1 week prevents nitric oxide synthase dysfunction caused by continuous nitroglycerin (9316).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: A cross-sectional analysis suggests that adults with NAFLD have lower levels of serum folate and its major component 5-MTHF when compared with healthy controls. Additionally, adults with NAFLD seem to consume less supplementary and dietary folate when compared with healthy controls. Overall, serum folate levels are negatively associated with the risk of NAFLD, and inadequate folate intake is associated with an increased risk of NAFLD (112104).
• Oral clefts. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of oral clefts in infants. Details: Observational research has found that maternal folic acid supplementation is associated with an up to 49% reduced risk of cleft lip with or without cleft palate (50220,104921). Furthermore, a large clinical trial in pregnancies at-risk for oral cleft suggests that taking a higher dose of folic acid 4 mg from pre-conception until the end of the first trimester results in a similar oral cleft recurrence rate of 2.5%, compared with a 2.9% recurrence with a lower dose of folic acid (400 mcg). Both doses demonstrate a lower incidence of oral clefts when compared with historical rates of 6.3% (91322). Although there is speculation that genetic markers of folate status impact the effect of folic acid on orofacial cleft incidence, the current data do not show a relationship (104921).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of overall mortality. Details: Observational research in US adults has found that dietary intake of folic acid in the highest quintile is associated with a 14% to 23% lower risk of all-cause mortality and a 41% to 47% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality when compared with the lowest quintile of dietary folic acid intake (110451).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces pancreatic cancer risk. Details: Consuming greater than 280 mcg daily of dietary folate is associated with a decreased risk of exocrine pancreatic cancer (9327). A meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies suggests that consuming higher amounts of dietary folate reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer by 51% compared to low levels of dietary folate (50208). However, another meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies suggests that folate/folic acid intake does not significantly affect the overall risk of pancreatic cancer (50499). The contradictory results may be associated with the form of intake or may be related to the gender of the participants. A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that dietary folate, but not folic acid, significantly reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer (50387). Also, one meta-analysis of observational studies has found that high dietary folate decreases the risk of pancreatic cancer in females, but not males (50387).
• Peripheral neuropathy. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows taking a combination of folic acid 400 mcg, vitamin B12 3 mcg, and uridine monophosphate 50 mg daily (Keltican) for 60 days reduces pain associated with peripheral neuropathy. Use of this product reduces pain intensity by approximately 44%, with loss of burning pain in approximately 50% of patients, strong tingling or pricking in approximately 57% of patients, strong pain attacks in 92% of patients, and numbness in 90% of patients when compared with baseline. Radiating pain and the use of concomitant medications are also reduced (90384). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Furthermore, it is unclear if the benefits are due to folic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Pharyngeal cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces pharyngeal cancer risk. Details: Population research has found that intake of folic acid and folate from natural, fortified, and supplemented sources, may protect against oropharyngeal cancer. Intake of at least 258-816 mcg total folate/folic acid reduces the odds by 35% when compared with intakes of less than 344 mcg. Furthermore, folate/folic acid may be more beneficial for oral cancer versus pharyngeal cancer and in heavy alcohol users versus non users or light users (91302).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial for PCOS. Details: One clinical study in overweight or obese patients with PCOS shows that taking folate 1 mg or 5 mg daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces levels of homocysteine, as well as insulin resistance, when compared with placebo. However, only the 5 mg dose modestly reduces insulin, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. Neither dose appears to affect fasting plasma glucose, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglyceride levels when compared with placebo (109200). Other clinical research in patients with PCOS taking metformin shows that taking folate 400 mcg daily for 6 months does not affect glycemic parameters, plasma lipid levels, or hormone levels when compared with placebo (109194). The reasons for discrepancies between studies are unclear but may relate to patient characteristics. One study included only overweight or obese individuals with at least two of the three PCOS criteria, whereas the other study limited enrollment to patients in any weight category but with all three PCOS criteria (109194,109200).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of hypertension during pregnancy. Details: Population research has found that taking folic acid during pregnancy is not associated with a reduced risk of gestational hypertension (91308,99370,99372).
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). Although there is interest in using oral folic acid for RLS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of folic acid for this condition.
• Schizophrenia. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of folic acid 2 mg and vitamin B12 400 mcg daily for 16 weeks improves negative symptoms when compared with placebo in patients with schizophrenia who have persistent symptoms and a specific genetic variant of the folate transporter gene FOLHI. This variant normally results in reduced folate absorption. However, in patients without this genetic variant, folate is not beneficial with respect to negative symptom improvement (90387).
• Sickle cell disease. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other B vitamins; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with sickle cell disease shows that taking vitamin B12 4.2-6 mcg, folic acid 700 mcg, and vitamin B6 4.2-6 mg daily might lower homocysteine levels. However, it is unknown if this will reduce the risk of endothelial damage in these patients (9324).
• Suicidal ideation. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of suicidal ideation or suicide attempts. Details: One observational study has evaluated the association between folic acid supplementation and suicidal events in patients with various underlying conditions, including 12% with depression, 15% with anxiety, and 46% with pain. This within-person cohort study found that filling a prescription for folic acid 0.4-5 mg daily, either alone or as part of a multivitamin, is associated with a 44% reduced rate of suicidal events during the months after the prescription when compared with the months without the prescription. For the 48% of patients who received folic acid 1 mg daily, each additional month of taking the prescription was associated with a 5% decrease in suicidal events (109201). Prospective clinical research is needed to confirm any benefits of folic acid and to determine whether baseline folate deficiency plays a role in these outcomes. More evidence is needed to rate folic acid for these uses.

(Read more about FOLIC ACID)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Iodine deficiency. Oral iodine supplements, including iodized salt, are effective for improving iodine status and reducing goiter size in adults and children. Iodine supplementation is also recommended during pregnancy in areas at risk for iodine deficiency. Details: Iodine deficiency is associated with several adverse outcomes. The earliest clinical symptom of iodine deficiency is low circulating thyroid hormone and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), followed by thyroid goiter (7135,16747,91398). Iodine deficiency and subsequent hypothyroidism can lead to anovulation, infertility, autoimmune thyroiditis, and gestational hypertension. Iodine deficiency is also associated with increased risk of thyroid cancer (16747). Clinical research shows that taking iodine supplements, including iodized salt, improves iodine status and reduces goiter size in adults with iodine deficiency (16747,55919,103071). Studies also show that taking iodine supplementation, including iodized salt, in areas of endemic iodine deficiency, reduces goiter size in children (16747,55919). When taken during pregnancy for iodine deficiency, iodine supplements and iodized salt reduce both maternal and newborn thyroid size and thyroglobulin; however, the effect on maternal TSH is inconsistent (91399,103070). Although some clinical studies and one analysis show that perinatal use of iodine has no effect on the incidence of thyroid disorders during pregnancy (91399,97240,97241), one analysis shows that iodine supplementation reduces the risk of postpartum hyperthyroidism by 68% when compared with placebo (97240). Taking iodine supplementation before 12 weeks' gestation appears to be more effective than when taken later in pregnancy. Perinatal iodine supplementation has no effect on preterm birth rate (97240,97241). Evidence is limited to females with mild-moderate iodine deficiency; the routine use of iodine supplementation during pregnancy has not been extensively studied. For example, the effect of perinatal supplementation on newborn neurocognitive development is conflicting and the evidence is generally low quality (55976,97241,105880,108706). Despite the limited evidence, iodine supplementation is recommended in areas at risk of deficiency.
• Radiation exposure. Oral potassium iodide prevents thyroid uptake of radioactive iodine. However, it does not protect against other sources of radiation. Details: Taking potassium iodide is effective for preventing the uptake of radioactive iodine by the thyroid (7517,7518). Doses of potassium iodide protect for about 24 hours. Therefore, it should be taken daily until the risk of radiation exposure no longer exists (17575,17576).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Conjunctivitis. Ophthalmic povidone-iodine solution seems to reduce the risk of conjunctivitis in infants. It may also improve the resolution of acute conjunctivitis in adults. It is unclear if it is beneficial in patients with adenoviral conjunctivitis. Details: A meta-analysis of low-quality clinical trials shows that povidone-iodine solutions are more effective than silver nitrate for preventing neonatal conjunctivitis. However, povidone-iodine solutions are not more effective than erythromycin or chloramphenicol (56084). Povidone-iodine in combination with dexamethasone also seems to be helpful in adults. A clinical trial in patients with acute viral conjunctivitis shows that applying povidone-iodine 0.6% with dexamethasone 0.1% four times daily for 4 days improves clinical symptoms and eradiation of viral counts when compared with placebo control (103075). A small clinical study in adults with adenoviral conjunctivitis shows that administering 4-5 drops of a povidone-iodine 5% eye drop solution within 4 days of symptom onset decreases viral load, mucoid discharge, and bulbar edema and redness on day 4 of a 21-day follow-up period, but at no other time points, when compared with a single dose of artificial tears (108705). Due to the single-dose nature of this study, the effects of continued administration are unclear.
• Diabetic foot ulcers. Topical iodine seems to help with the management of diabetic foot ulcer wounds. Details: A small clinical study in patients with diabetic foot ulcers shows that topically applying cadexomer iodine ointment (Iodosorb) for 12 weeks seems to improve healing to a similar degree as using standard treatment with gentamicin solution, streptokinase, and/or dry saline gauze (2200).
• Endometritis. Topical application of iodine prior to cesarean delivery seems to reduce the risk of endometritis. Details: A meta-analysis of eight clinical trials shows that vaginally applying povidone-iodine 1% to 10% solution immediately before cesarean delivery reduces the risk of post-cesarean endometritis by 62% when compared with saline or no cleaning. It also reduces postoperative fever by 13% and wound infection by 23% (99794). These findings are consistent with other meta-analyses (56080,103076). There seems to be no difference in benefit whether povidone-iodine 1%, 5%, or 10% is used. A network meta-analysis of clinical studies in patients having cesarean delivery suggests that povidone-iodine is no better at preventing endometritis than using chlorhexidine or metronidazole; however, there may not have been sufficient power to detect a difference (103076).
• Fibrocystic breast disease. Oral iodine seems to reduce breast pain in patients with fibrocystic breast disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with fibrocystic breast disease shows that taking sodium iodide, protein bound iodide, or molecular iodine for 6 months or longer improves mastalgia and reduces breast nodules when compared with baseline or control. Molecular iodine in doses of 70-90 mcg/kg appears to be more effective and better tolerated than the other forms (2197). Another clinical study in patients with cyclic mastalgia due to fibrocystic breast disease shows that taking tablets containing molecular iodine 3000-6000 mcg daily for 5 months reduces pain, tenderness, and nodularity in patients with cyclic mastalgia when compared with placebo. However, a lower dose of 1500 mcg daily does not appear to be beneficial (55960).
• Oral mucositis. Rinsing the mouth with a povidone-iodine solution may prevent oral mucositis from radiochemotherapy. Details: Small clinical studies in patients receiving radiation and chemotherapy for cancer shows that using an oral povidone-iodine rinse seems to reduce the risk for oral mucositis when compared with using sterile water (2198,2199).
• Periodontitis. Rinsing with povidone-iodine solution in addition to scaling and root planing seems to be modestly beneficial in patients with periodontitis. Details: A meta-analysis of mostly small clinical studies in patients with chronic periodontitis suggests that rinsing with povidone-iodine 0.1% to 10% during scaling and root planing modestly reduces the periodontal pocket depth when compared with rinsing with water or saline solution (56072).
• Postoperative infection. Povidone-iodine antisepsis prevents postoperative infection when compared with inactive controls such as normal saline and water. However, it is unclear how it compares to active controls such as chlorhexidine; practice guidelines are conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intraoperative application of povidone-iodine reduces the risk of surgical site infection by approximately 40% when compared with saline or no irrigation (56088). However, research comparing povidone-iodine with other antiseptics such as chlorhexidine is conflicting, as are official guidelines for surgical antisepsis. Many of these discrepancies seem to be related to the presence or absence of alcohol in the preparation. A meta-analysis of clinical research comparing aqueous or alcohol-based povidone-iodine shows that using alcohol-based chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis is more effective for preventing postoperative surgical site infections and may be associated with a lower overall positive culture rate. However, since evidence for both aqueous and alcohol-based solutions of povidone-iodine were included in this study, it is unclear if this may have affected outcomes (108710). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guideline recommends chlorhexidine solution as the first choice for preparing the skin for surgery, with povidone-iodine solution as a second-line option. The antiseptic solutions are recommended to be alcohol-based as long as the surgical site is not near a mucous membrane (105906). The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines also recommend alcohol-based chlorhexidine solutions over either alcohol-based or aqueous povidone-iodine for preventing surgical site infections. However, some experts have expressed concern that these recommendations are based on faulty evidence, as some studies used povidone-iodine preparations with lower alcohol amounts than their comparator groups (105898). In fact, the guideline from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) does not differentiate between povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine antiseptic solutions as long as they are alcohol-based (105905).
• Thyroid storm. Oral iodine is recommended as an adjunct to standard treatment for thyroid storm. Details: The American Thyroid Association (ATA) and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) recommend a multimodality approach for treating thyroid storm that includes taking five drops of a saturated solution of potassium iodine every 6 hours (15,92699).
• Thyroid nodules. Combining oral iodine with thyroxine seems to improve the resolution of thyroid nodules. Details: A clinical study in patients with benign nodular thyroid disease and possible iodine deficiency shows that taking iodized salt 200 mcg daily in addition to thyroxine 1.5 mcg/kg daily after surgery seems to reduce the size of the thyroid remnant by 40%, compared with a 10% reduction in patients given thyroxine alone (55927). Also, one large clinical trial in patients with nodular goiter shows that taking potassium iodide 150 mcg daily in combination with levothyroxine 50-100 mcg daily for 12 months reduces nodule volume by about 17%, compared with 7% in the group using levothyroxine alone (91392).
• Venous leg ulcers. Topical cadexomer iodine seems to improve the healing of venous leg ulcers; however, it is unclear if applying povidone-iodine is beneficial. Details: A meta-analysis of four small clinical studies in patients with venous leg ulcers shows that applying cadexomer iodine results in complete healing of ulcers in 33% of patients after 4-12 weeks, compared with only 15% of patients receiving standard care alone. However, use of cadexomer iodine was associated with more adverse effects than standard care. Furthermore, preliminary clinical research shows that applying cadexomer iodine is comparable to hydrocolloid dressing, paraffin gauze dressing, dextranomer, and silver-impregnated dressings for improving the rate of complete healing. A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research show that povidone-iodine has comparable healing rates when compared with amoxicillin, hydrocolloid dressings, and moist or foam dressings (99798). These findings were consistent with an older version of this meta-analysis (56076).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Catheter-related infections. Topical povidone-iodine seems to be less effective than chlorhexidine for preventing infections from intravascular catheters. Furthermore, it does not seem to reduce the risk of catheter-related urinary tract infections. Details: One meta-analysis of clinical research shows that topical application of povidone-iodine reduces the risk of bloodstream infections when applied at the insertion site of hemodialysis central venous catheters (55883). However, disinfecting catheter insertion sites using povidone-iodine seems to be less effective for preventing blood stream infections in patients receiving central venous, pulmonary artery, or peripheral artery catheters when compared with chlorhexidine solutions (55883,55916). In addition, periurethral cleansing with povidone-iodine 10% prior to bladder catheterization, as well as bladder irrigation with povidone-iodine 2% prior to urinary catheter removal, does not seem to reduce the risk of urinary tract infections when compared with placebo (56058,56126).
• Prematurity. Maternal iodine supplementation does not seem to impact neurological development in premature infants. Details: A meta-analysis of two clinical trials in premature infants shows that adding iodine to enteral or parenteral feeds does not improve mental, visual, or auditory development or reduce the risk of death when compared with no iodine supplementation (99797).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Chyluria. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with chyluria. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chyluria suggests that using povidone-iodine 0.2% solution as a sclerosant in renal pelvic instillation sclerotherapy (RPIS) may be as effective as using silver nitrate 1% (55970).
• Corneal ulceration. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with corneal ulceration. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that administering povidone-iodine 2.5% eye drops every two hours for two weeks in addition to standard antibiotic therapy does not reduce visual impairment in patients with corneal ulcers when compared with standard antibiotic therapy alone (55971).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if rinsing with a povidone-iodine mouthwash and using a povidone-iodine nasal spray and ointment can reduce the spread of COVID-19. Details: A small clinical study in adults with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 shows that orally swishing and gargling 25 mL of povidone-iodine (PI) 1% solution, then, into each nostril, spraying 2.5 mL of PI 1% solution and applying one dab of PI 10% ointment, and repeating this 4 times daily for 5 days does not seem to alter the quantity of viral RNA over time when compared with control (105877). The validity of this finding is limited because all study participants achieved negative viral titers on the third day of the study.
• Cutaneous sporotrichosis. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with cutaneous sporotrichosis; research is conflicting. Details: Anecdotal reports and case series suggest that taking saturated solution of potassium iodide (SSKI) orally is effective for most patients when used alone or in combination with another antifungal, including terbinafine or itraconazole (17562,17563,17564,17565,17566,17567,17568,17569,17570,17571) (17572,17573). In one non-controlled clinical study, treatment with SSKI, starting with 3 drops (150 mg potassium iodide) daily and titrating up, resulted in symptom resolution in about 90% of patients after about 33 days of treatment (17561). However, some patients are not able to take SSKI due to intolerable side effects (17561,17572).
• Hyperthyroidism. It is unclear if oral potassium iodide is beneficial for patients with Graves' disease undergoing total thyroidectomy. Details: A retrospective study in patients with Graves' disease undergoing total thyroidectomy shows that preoperative administration of saturated solution of potassium iodide (SSKI) 5% does not reduce the rate of postoperative complications, such as transient or permanent hypoparathyroidism, transient recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy, definitive RLN palsy, and cervical hematoma, when compared with no preoperative administration (108707).
• Infant development. It is unclear if maternal iodine supplementation impacts neurological development in infants. Details: Three-year follow-up data from a clinical study in infants and breastfeeding females shows that maternal supplementation of iodine 150 mcg daily improves child cognitive scores, but does not affect language or motor scores, when compared with placebo. Supplementation with a higher dose of 300 mcg daily yielded similar cognitive, language, and motor scores as the 150 mcg dose (108706). This finding aligns with the daily recommended dietary allowance (RDA) of 290 mcg during lactation, which is sometimes achieved by augmenting the diet with a 150-mcg iodine supplement (7135).
• Postoperative bleeding. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with postoperative bleeding. Details: A small clinical study suggests that irrigating extraction sockets with povidone-iodine 1% stops bleeding in a greater number of patients following tooth extraction when compared with a saline solution (56011).
• Rhinosinusitis. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with rhinosinusitis. Details: A small prospective cohort study in patients with recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis has found that using a povidone-iodine 0.08% nasal rinse every other day for 7 weeks in addition to standard therapy improves symptoms and reduces signs of infection when compared with baseline (103074). However, one small clinical study in patients with a history of sinus surgery and acute exacerbations of chronic sinusitis shows that receiving povidone-iodine nasal irrigations twice daily for 30 days is no different than irrigations with mupirocin or normal saline for improving nasal symptoms. However, mupirocin tended to reduce bacteria count to a greater extent than the povidone-iodine solution (105878). This finding is limited due to small study size and potential lack of power to detect differences between groups.
• Thyroid cancer. It is unclear if dietary iodine is associated with complications in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. Details: A retrospective study in patients in China with papillary thyroid cancer has found that dietary intake of iodine resulting in serum concentrations greater than 90 mcg/L is associated with a 75% increased risk of cervical lymph node metastases when compared with concentrations less than 45 mcg/L (108708). Actual dietary intake of iodine was not reported, limiting the validity of this finding.
• Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). It is unclear if oral iodine rinse is beneficial for the prevention of VAP. Details: A small clinical study in patients with severe head trauma suggests that regularly rinsing the throat with 20 mL of povidone-iodine 10% solution decreases the risk for VAP when compared with using a saline rinse (56003).
• Wound healing. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial for wound healing. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that topical iodine, as cadexomer iodine or povidone-iodine, is superior to non-antiseptic dressings and some antiseptic agents, such as silver sulfadiazine, for reducing wound size. However, iodine seems to be less effective than local antibiotics such as rifamycin (56083). More evidence is needed to rate iodine for these uses.

(Read more about IODINE)

EFFECTIVE

• Manganese deficiency. Oral and intravenous manganese can prevent and treat manganese deficiency. Details: Taking manganese orally or intravenously is effective for preventing or treating manganese deficiency (15). However, the incidence of manganese deficiency is not well documented. Long-term home parenteral nutrition should provide no more than 55 mcg daily of manganese for adults or 1 mcg/kg daily (up to 50 mcg) of manganese for children unless clinically indicated (96416,99302). A clinical trial in children aged 8-14 months who are manganese deficient shows that taking manganese in addition to other vitamins and minerals in a 30 mL beverage six days per week for up to 14 months promotes growth when compared with placebo (19348).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if intranasal manganese is beneficial in patients with allergic rhinitis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chronic allergic rhinitis shows that using an isotonic seawater nasal spray enriched with manganese (Sterimar Mn, Laboratori Baldacci) four puffs daily for 5 months, in addition to standard treatment with oral antihistamines, nasal corticosteroids, and nasal decongestants, reduces the number of acute exacerbations by about three when compared with the standard treatment alone (99416). However, the effect of the manganese in this product is unclear since nasal lavage with a plain saline nasal spray also helps in allergic rhinitis.
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Intravenous manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients being treated for exacerbation of COPD shows that intravenous supplementation with manganese 0.4 mg, selenium 100 mcg, and zinc 2 mg daily may shorten the number of days spent on mechanical ventilation when compared with placebo (61432). It is unclear if these findings are due to manganese, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral intake of or environmental exposure to manganese decreases the risk of metabolic syndrome. Details: A meta-analysis of 12 observational studies suggests that increased dietary intake of manganese or higher levels of manganese in the serum, whole blood, or urine are not associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome when compared with lower manganese intake or laboratory values (112138).
• Obesity. Oral manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in overweight adults shows that taking a specific combination product (7-Keto Naturalean, Enzymatic Therapy, Inc.) containing manganese 500 mcg, 7-oxo-DHEA 100 mg, L-tyrosine 100 mg, asparagus root extract 100 mg, choline bitartrate 50 mg, inositol 50 mg, copper gluconate 500 mcg, and potassium iodide 100 mcg daily for 8 weeks reduces body weight by around 1.5 kg and body mass index (BMI) by around 0.7 kg/m² when compared with placebo (61581).
• Osteoarthritis. Oral manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Small clinical studies in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and lower back show that taking a specific combination product (Cosamin DS, Nutramax Laboratories) containing manganese ascorbate 228-304 mg (about 31-41 mg of elemental manganese), glucosamine hydrochloride 1500-2000 mg, and chondroitin sulfate 1200-1600 mg daily for 4 months improves pain and ability to do activities of daily living when compared with baseline or placebo (4237,7169). The amount of manganese in the Cosamin DS formulation used in this study is considerably higher than the 1 mg of elemental manganese per 1500 mg of glucosamine hydrochloride in the current formulation. Since numerous studies show glucosamine with chondroitin without manganese might be effective for osteoarthritis, it is not possible to draw conclusions about the effects of manganese alone.
• Osteoporosis. Oral manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in postmenopausal patients shows that taking manganese 5 mg in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg, zinc 15 mg, and copper 2.5 mg daily for 2 years reduces spinal bone loss when compared with placebo (1994). Another small clinical study in females with osteopenia shows that taking a specific combination product (Vitrum Osteomag, Unipharm Inc.) containing manganese 1.8 mg, calcium 600 mg, vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 200 IU, magnesium 40 mg, zinc 7.5 mg, copper 1 mg, and boron 250 mcg twice daily for one year improves bone mineral density when compared with no treatment (36840). However, since numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of calcium plus vitamin D for osteoporosis, it is not possible to draw conclusions about the effects of manganese alone.
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Oral manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with PMS shows that taking manganese 1.0 mg or 5.6 mg in combination with calcium 587 mg or 1336 mg daily for about 24 weeks improves symptoms of PMS including pain, crying, loneliness, anxiety, restlessness, irritability, mood swings, depression, and tension (2004).
• Wound healing. Topical manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Observational research has found that applying an alginate dressing containing manganese, calcium, and zinc to chronic wounds for 12 weeks is associated with improved wound healing when compared with previous treatments (61327). It is unclear if these findings are due to manganese, other ingredients, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate manganese for these uses.

(Read more about MANGANESE)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Pellagra. Oral niacinamide is approved for the treatment of pellagra and niacin deficiency. Details: Niacinamide is FDA-approved for the prevention and treatment of niacin deficiency and pellagra. Niacinamide is sometimes preferred over niacin for this indication because it lacks the vasodilating and flushing effects of niacin (15,6243).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Acne. Topical niacinamide seems to improve acne symptoms in some patients. Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One clinical study shows that applying niacinamide 4% gel twice daily for 8 weeks is as effective as clindamycin 1% gel for reducing the number and severity of acne lesions. The niacinamide gel appears to be more effective in patients with oily skin than those with non-oily skin (93360). Other preliminary clinical research in adults with mild to moderate acne vulgaris shows that applying niacinamide 5% cream twice daily, 10 minutes after applying benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel, for 12 weeks reduces the number of acne lesions, but not erythema or inflammation, when compared with benzoyl peroxide alone (107711). Niacinamide has also been studied in combination with other ingredients. In preliminary clinical research, oral niacinamide has been reported to improve acne when used in combination with zinc, copper, and folic acid (Nicomide) (25557), or in combination with azelaic acid, zinc, pyridoxine, copper, and folic acid (NicAzel, Elorac Inc.) (90800). In a small observational study, topical niacinamide 4% combined with gallic acid 1% and lauric acid 1% was associated with some improvement in acne (104931). It is unclear if the effects in these studies are due to niacinamide, other ingredients, or the combinations.
• Diabetes. Oral niacinamide does not seem to prevent the onset of type 1 diabetes, although it might slow its progression. Details: Although some older research has suggested that taking high-dose niacinamide can reduce the risk of type 1 diabetes in high-risk children (4874), results from higher quality, more rigorous clinical trials show that taking niacinamide up to 3 grams daily for 5 years does not prevent the onset of type 1 diabetes in first-degree relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes (4875,25553,25554). However, taking niacinamide 1.2 grams/m2 daily for 5 years may prevent the loss of beta-cell function in these patients (25555). Also, there is evidence showing that niacinamide can preserve residual beta-cell function in patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes (4877,4878,4879,4880,25556). Clinical trials, including one placebo-controlled trial and one vitamin E-comparison study, show niacinamide can prolong the "honeymoon period" in those newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, when the pancreas is still capable of producing some insulin (4877,4878,4879,4880,25556). However, some scientists have raised concerns about potential induction of insulin resistance with short-term use of niacinamide 2 grams daily for 2 weeks (4881). Niacinamide has also been evaluated in adults with type 2 diabetes. A small clinical study in lean patients with type 2 diabetes who failed sulfonylurea therapy shows that taking niacinamide 500 mg three times daily for 6 months in addition to continuing insulin or a sulfonylurea increases C-peptide release and improves insulin secretion when compared with insulin alone (4882).
• Hyperphosphatemia. Adding oral niacinamide to standard treatment with phosphate binders further lowers blood levels of phosphorus in patients on hemodialysis. Details: A meta-analysis of nine small clinical trials in patients on hemodialysis with hyperphosphatemia who are using a phosphate binder shows that taking niacinamide 250-1500 mg daily for 2-6 months lowers serum phosphorus and parathyroid hormone levels when compared with placebo (98940) Another meta-analysis of two small clinical trials in the same patient population also shows that taking niacinamide, titrated from 500 mg to 1500 mg daily over 8 weeks, reduces serum phosphorus levels by about 0.9 mg/dL when compared with placebo (94188). Other clinical research in this population shows that taking modified-release niacinamide 250-1500 mg orally daily for 12-24 weeks also lowers serum phosphate and parathyroid levels when compared with placebo. However, these effects were not maintained at 40-52 weeks follow-up (107709,110499). In addition, this product was not compared with immediate-release niacinamide. Niacinamide has also been studied in place of phosphate binders. One small clinical study in patients on hemodialysis with hyperphosphatemia shows that taking niacinamide 500-1750 mg daily for 12 weeks, beginning 2 weeks after discontinuation of phosphate binders, decreases serum phosphorus levels by 1.5 mg/dL and intact parathyroid hormone levels by 50 pg/mL, without affecting calcium levels, when compared to baseline (25561).The validity of these findings is limited due to the lack of a control group.
• Osteoarthritis. Oral high-dose niacinamide might be beneficial for improving osteoarthritis symptoms. Details: Clinical research in patients with osteoarthritis shows that taking niacinamide 3 grams daily in six divided doses for 12 weeks improves joint flexibility, reduces inflammation, and modestly decreases use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) when compared with placebo (4883).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Brain tumor. Adding high-dose oral niacinamide to chemotherapy does not seem to improve survival in patients with brain tumors. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with surgically resected brain tumors shows that treatment with radiotherapy, niacinamide, and carbogen does not improve survival when compared with radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy plus carbogen (11695,11696).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Actinic keratoses. It is unclear if oral or topical niacinamide is beneficial for reducing actinic keratoses. Research results are conflicting. Details: A large clinical trial in healthy Australian adults with actinic keratoses shows that taking a specific niacinamide product (Insolar, Blackmores) 500 mg twice daily for 12 months reduces the number of actinic keratoses by 13% when compared with placebo. The difference between the 2 groups was observed as early as 3 months after starting niacinamide (93362). Additionally, a small clinical study in healthy, older Australian adults with actinic keratoses shows that taking niacinamide (Nature's Own, Virginia) 500 mg once or twice daily for 4 months reduces the total number of actinic keratoses by 29% and 35%, respectively, when compared with placebo (93365). However, a large clinical trial in solid organ transplant recipients in Australia shows that taking a specific niacinamide product (Insolar, Blackmores) 500 mg twice daily for 6 months does not reduce the number of actinic keratoses when compared with placebo (113559). Also, a small clinical trial in kidney transplant recipients with actinic keratoses and a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer shows that taking niacinamide 500 mg twice daily for 12 months does not decrease the number of actinic keratoses when compared with placebo (113682). The study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. Two small clinical studies conducted in Brazil in elderly adults with actinic keratoses shows that taking niacinamide 500 mg twice daily for 120 days or applying a cream containing niacinamide 5% twice daily for 56 days does not reduce the number of actinic keratoses when compared with placebo (107714,113684). Most studies were conducted in countries with high year-round ultraviolet radiation exposure, such as Australia and Brazil; results may not be readily extrapolated to populations in other geographic regions.
• Age-related cognitive decline. Although there is interest in using oral niacinamide for age-related cognitive decline, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacinamide for this purpose.
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study in patients with early-stage age-related maculopathy shows that taking a combination of niacinamide 18 mg, vitamin E 20 mg, and lutein 15 mg daily for nearly a year improves retinal function when compared with no treatment (60134). It is unclear if this effect is due to niacinamide, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Aging skin. It is unclear if topical niacinamide improves symptoms of aging skin. Details: A small study in females with signs of facial photo-aging shows that applying niacinamide 5% cream to half of the face twice daily for 12 weeks improves blotchiness, the appearance of wrinkles, skin elasticity, and skin pigmentation when compared with applying placebo cream to the other half of the face (25551).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if topical niacinamide improves eczema symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients with atopic dermatitis and dry skin shows that applying niacinamide 2% cream twice daily for 8 weeks decreases skin water loss and improves skin hydration when compared with using a white petrolatum moisturizer (25560). A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with mild atopic dermatitis (AD) shows that applying a specific niacinamide containing body emollient (Bioderma Atoderm PP Baume, Bioderma Cosmetics Trading Co., Ltd.) 250 grams weekly, applied twice daily for 28 days with or without pre-cleansing with a specific niacinamide containing gel wash (Atoderm Intensive Gel Moussant, Bioderma Cosmetics Trading Co., Ltd.), improves AD severity, itching, trans-epidermal water loss, skin water content, and dermatological quality of life when compared with a control emollient and water-only skin cleansing. Additionally, using both the niacinamide containing emollient and cleansing gel improves trans-epidermal water loss and skin water content sooner when compared with niacin containing emollient only (113681). However, the study may have been inadequately powered and too short in duration to detect additional differences between the 2 niacinamide groups.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other vitamins; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children with ADHD shows that taking a maximum of niacinamide 3 grams, ascorbic acid 3 grams, calcium pantothenate 1.2 grams, and pyridoxine 600 mg daily for 3 months seems to improve behavior in 29% of participants when compared with baseline (9957). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Bladder cancer. Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with carbogen for improving survival in advanced bladder cancer; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A phase II clinical study in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer shows that adding inhaled carbogen and oral niacinamide 40-60 mg/kg about 2 hours before radiotherapy shows a trend to improved survival at 3 years when compared with inhaled carbogen and radiotherapy (25558), and a larger phase III study shows that carbogen and oral niacinamide improves 3-year survival by about 13% when compared with radiotherapy alone (93366). An observational follow-up of the phase III study found a trend to increased survival at 5 years in the carbogen and niacinamide group when compared with radiotherapy alone. And in a subgroup of patients with tumor necrosis, the 5-year survival was significantly greater with carbogen and niacinamide when compared with radiotherapy alone (93356). It is unclear if these effects are due to niacinamide, carbogen, or the combination.
• Child growth. It is unclear if oral niacinamide improves child growth. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children in rural Tanzania shows that supplementing niacinamide orally from birth to 18 months of age does not improve length-for-age, weight-for-age, or head circumference when compared with control. Niacinamide was initially supplemented to breast-feeding mothers, 250 mg daily, until 6 months of age, followed by 100 mg daily taken by the child until 18 months of age (107713).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral niacinamide is beneficial for COVID-19. Details: Observational research in adults with acute kidney injury secondary to coronavirus disease-19 infection has found that taking niacinamide 1000 mg orally daily for 7 days is associated with a 55% lower risk of mortality when compared with control. However, taking niacinamide was not associated with a lower risk of renal replacement therapy (110500).
• Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). It is unclear if topical niacinamide is beneficial for CLE. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with discoid lupus erythematosus, a type of CLE, shows that applying topical niacinamide 2% to 4% twice daily for 12 weeks modestly improves lesion scores, but not quality of life scores, when compared with placebo. However, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (110498).
• Depression. Although there is interest in using oral niacinamide for depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacinamide for this condition.
• Diabetic neuropathy. Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with diabetic polyneuropathy shows that taking a specific combination product (Cytoflavin, Polysan) containing niacinamide, inosine, riboflavin, and succinate daily for 12 weeks improves symptom scores, including paresthesia and numbness scores, when compared with placebo. The therapy was first administered intravenously, providing niacinamide 200 mg, inosine 400 mg, riboflavin 40 mg, and succinate 2000 mg daily for 10 days, followed by an oral formulation providing niacinamide 100 mg, inosine 200 mg, riboflavin 20 mg, and succinate 1200 mg daily for the remainder of the study (110503).
• Erythema. Topical niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: There is interest in using niacinamide to reduce the side effects of topical tretinoin, including erythema. A small preliminary clinical study in patients using isotretinoin for acne shows that applying a specific cream (Sebiaclear Hydra, SVr Laboratoire Dermatologique) containing niacinamide 5% and omega-ceramides 8% twice daily for 6 months reduces isotretinoin-induced erythema, dryness, and itching of the skin when compared with a glycerin placebo (98938). It is not clear if this effect is due to niacinamide, omega-ceramides, or the combination.
• Head and neck cancer. Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with carbogen for improving survival in laryngeal cancer; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A phase III clinical trial in patients with laryngeal cancer shows that treatment with accelerated radiotherapy plus carbogen and niacinamide 60 mg/kg taken orally 1-1.5 hours prior to each fraction of radiation improves local tumor control, but does not improve overall survival or 5-year disease-free survival, when compared with accelerated radiotherapy alone. In a subgroup of patients with hypoxic tumors, anemia, or high expression of epidermal growth factor receptor, receiving niacinamide and carbogen seems to improve both survival and tumor control when compared with radiotherapy alone (93358,93359,93363).
• Melasma. It is unclear if topical niacinamide improves melasma. Details: A small clinical study in female adults with melasma shows that applying a specific niacinamide 10% serum (Bo leda, Shanghai Ruizhi Medical Technology Co., Ltd) twice daily after skin cleansing for 16 weeks improves melasma area and severity, pigmented spots, and skin texture when compared with control. Both groups were also treated with salicylic acid 30% throughout the study (113683). Topical niacinamide has also been studied in patients with hyperpigmentation. A small clinical study in Japanese females with uneven facial hyperpigmentation shows that applying niacinamide 5% moisturizer to the face twice daily reduces hyperpigmentation and increases skin lightness after 4 weeks when compared with placebo moisturizer. However, further improvements are not observed after another 4 weeks of treatment (25552). Another small clinical study in Korean females with uneven facial hyperpigmentation shows that applying a moisturizer containing niacinamide 2% plus tranexamic acid 2% (Regederm RX White Project, Aestura) twice daily for 8 weeks reduces skin pigmentation by about 9% when compared with a placebo cream (93361).
• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is unclear if adding oral niacinamide to chemotherapy reduces relapses of refractory lymphoma. Details: One small clinical study in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma shows that 24% of patients achieve complete or partial remission and 57% achieve disease stabilization when compared with baseline, following treatment with vorinostat 400 mg daily and niacinamide titrated from 20 mg/kg to 100 mg/kg over the first 14 days of a 21-day cycle for up to 18 cycles (93355). It is unclear how these outcomes compare to using vorinostat alone, or to other control treatments.
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral niacinamide is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with NAFLD and diabetes shows that taking a specific niacinamide product (Nature's Life) 1000 mg orally daily for 12 weeks does not improve liver function tests, liver steatosis, or liver fibrosis when compared with no intervention. However, some quality of life domain scores were moderately improved. However, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (110502).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral or topical niacinamide reduces the risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 clinical trials in adults shows that taking niacinamide 500 mg twice daily for 4-12 months does not reduce the risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer when compared with placebo. This analysis also shows no effect of niacinamide on the risk of basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (113560). However, there was high heterogeneity across the studies due to differences in patient populations and mixed results overall. Two studies included in the analysis show that niacinamide, including a specific niacinamide product (Nature's Own, Virginia), reduces the risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer in immunocompetent adults when compared with placebo (93362,93365). One was a large clinical trial that shows taking a specific niacinamide product (Insolar, Blackmores) 500 mg twice daily for 12 months reduces the rate of new nonmelanoma skin cancer by 23%, but it does not reduce the risk of not recurrent nonmelanoma skin cancers, when compared with placebo. However, this reduced risk appears to be transient. Follow up 6 months after niacinamide was discontinued showed no difference between groups (93362). The 2 other studies analyzed, including a large trial using a specific niacinamide product (Insolar, Blackmores), were conducted in transplant recipients showed no reduced risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer when compared with placebo (113560,113559). All studies were conducted in Australia; it is unclear if these results can be extrapolated to other geographical regions with different background ultraviolet radiation exposure and skin cancer rates. A previous meta-analysis of 5 clinical studies shows taking niacinamide 500-1000 mg daily for 6-12 months or applying niacinamide 1% twice daily for 6 months decreases the rate of basal cell and cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas by 54% and 52%, respectively when compared with control. Niacinamide was only administered topically in 1 of the 5 studies and only reduced risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (110497).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Although there is interest in using oral niacinamide for PMS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacinamide for this condition.
• Pruritus. It is unclear if oral niacinamide reduces pruritus in patients with kidney failure. Details: A small clinical study in patients with pruritus due to kidney failure shows that taking niacinamide sodium 500 mg twice daily for 4 weeks does not reduce pruritus severity when compared with placebo (93364). This study is limited due to small size and short study duration.
• Psoriasis. It is unclear if oral niacinamide is beneficial for psoriasis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with mild to moderate psoriasis shows that applying niacinamide 4% cream topically twice daily for 12 weeks improves psoriasis scores by 31% when compared with baseline. The validity of these results is limited by the lack of a comparator group (110501).
• Rosacea. Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that 71% of adult and adolescent patients with rosacea who take a combination product (Nicomide) containing niacinamide 750 mg, zinc 25 mg, copper 1.5 mg, and folic acid 500 mcg once or twice daily report improvement in appearance after 4 weeks when compared to baseline (25557). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Schizophrenia. Although there is interest in using oral niacinamide for schizophrenia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacinamide for this condition.
• Seborrheic dermatitis. It is unclear if topical niacinamide is beneficial for reducing seborrheic dermatitis symptoms. Details: One small clinical study in patients with seborrheic dermatitis shows that applying niacinamide 4% cream once daily for 12 weeks reduces the severity of symptoms such as redness and scaling by 75%, compared with a 35% reduction when using a placebo cream (93357). More evidence is needed to rate niacinamide for these uses.

(Read more about NIACINAMIDE)

EFFECTIVE

• Pantothenic acid deficiency. Taking pantothenic acid 5-10 mg daily is effective for treating and preventing pantothenic acid deficiency (15).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Radiation dermatitis. Topical dexpanthenol does not seem to be beneficial for preventing or treating radiation dermatitis. Details: Applying dexpanthenol, an analog of pantothenic acid, twice daily to areas of irradiated skin does not seem to reduce erythema, desquamation, itching, or pain following radiation treatment (7192). Also, applying dexpanthenol 0.5% cream (Bepanthen, Hoffmann LaRoche ) daily during radiation therapy and for 2 weeks after completing radiation therapy is less effective than methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% cream (Advantan) at reducing radiation-induced skin irritation (67779).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Oral or topical pantothenic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In adults with mild to moderate acne, clinical research shows that taking a specific supplement (Pantothen, Avilan Marketing LLC) providing pantothenic acid 1.1 grams twice daily in addition to other B vitamins for 12 weeks modestly reduces total and non-inflammatory lesion counts when compared with placebo (105188). Also, in adolescents or young adults with mild to moderate acne, preliminary clinical research shows that topical application with a gel containing D-panthenol 4%, hydrogen peroxide 4%, and salicylic acid 0.5% once daily for 60 days modestly reduces acne lesions when compared with baseline (105189). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Alcoholism. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for improving recovery from alcoholism, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for allergic rhinitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Alopecia areata. Pantothenic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults with diffuse hair loss shows that intramuscular administration of dexpanthenol 250 mg and biotin 5 mg once weekly for 6 weeks reduces hair fall count at weeks 1 and 8, but only increases hair density at week 1, when compared to baseline (111366). The validity of these findings is limited by the study's small size, short duration, and lack of comparator group.
• Anxiety. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this purpose.
• Asthma. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Athletic performance. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid to improve athletic performance, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this purpose.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Oral pantothenic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Some small outdated clinical studies in children diagnosed with hyperkinesis suggest that taking calcium pantothenate 1.2 grams, alone or in combination with niacinamide, ascorbic acid, and pyridoxine, does not improve symptoms of hyperactivity when compared with placebo (3351,9957). It is unclear what effects pantothenic may have, if any, in children with a modern diagnosis of ADHD.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if topical pantothenic acid is beneficial in infants or children with atopic dermatitis. Details: One preliminary clinical trial in infants and children with stable mild atopic dermatitis shows that topical application of an emollient containing panthenol (Bepanthen, SensiDaily, Bayer Consumer Care AG) for 3 months is as effective as a reference emollient for reducing symptoms and preventing a flare. However, the efficacy of the reference emollient (Stelatopia Emollient Cream, Mustela; Laboratoires Expanscience) is unclear based on available preliminary clinical research (105190).
• Autism spectrum disorder. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for autism spectrum disorder, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Carpal tunnel syndrome. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for carpal tunnel syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Cheilitis. Topical pantothenic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small, open-label study in adults with mild-to-moderate cheilitis shows that applying a specific lip care product containing pantothenic acid and bisabolol (Eucerin Aquaphor SOS lip care) at least twice daily for 8 weeks reduces cheilitis severity scores by 5 points on a 12 point scale assessing erythema, scale, fissure, and inflammation when compared to baseline (114549). The validity of this finding is limited by the small study size and lack of a comparator group. Additionally, it is unclear if this effect is due to pantothenic acid, bisabolol, or the combination.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Conjunctivitis. Although there is interest in using oral or ocular pantothenic acid for conjunctivitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Constipation. It is unclear if oral or intramuscular dexpanthenol is beneficial for constipation. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that administering dexpanthenol (Bepanthene), an analog of pantothenic acid, 400 mg orally or 500 mg intramuscularly daily for 5 days decreases the time to a bowel movement in patients with chronic or occasional constipation when compared with an oral placebo (67822).
• Dandruff. Although there is interest in using oral or topical pantothenic acid for dandruff, is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Depression. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Diaper rash. Although there is interest in using topical pantothenic acid for diaper rash, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Dry eye. Although there is interest in using ocular pantothenic acid for dry eye, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Dry skin. It is unclear if topical dexpanthenol is beneficial for patients with dry skin. Details: A small, open-label study in healthy adults with dry skin shows that cleansing the skin with a dexpanthenol-containing liquid cleanser (DCLC, Bepanthen SensiControl Daily Gentle Body Wash) daily for 4 weeks increases stratum corneum hydration by 17% without affecting skin barrier function, pH, or microbiome when compared to baseline (111262). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of blinding and a comparator group.
• Epilepsy. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for epilepsy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Eye trauma. It is unclear if ocular dexpanthenol is beneficial for eye trauma. Details: Some preliminary clinical research shows that using eyedrops containing dexpanthenol 5%, a derivative of pantothenic acid, two drops four times daily for 28 days following surgery for retinal detachment reduces eye pain and discomfort when compared with placebo drops (67783). However, using a specific dexpanthenol 5% ointment (Bepanthen) does not seem to improve corneal epithelial wound healing following phototherapeutic keratectomy when compared with placebo (67801).
• Heart failure. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for heart failure, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Herpes zoster (shingles). Although there is interest in using oral or topical pantothenic acid for shingles, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Insomnia. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for insomnia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Laser skin resurfacing. It is unclear if topical dexpanthenol or pantothenic acid can reduce adverse effects after laser skin resurfacing procedures. Details: A preliminary clinical study shows that use of a dexpanthenol-containing ointment (Bepanthen Wound Healing Ointment, Bayer) once daily modestly reduces the diameter of lesions up to 3 days after fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing when compared with petroleum jelly (105743). Also, applying a specific cream (Cicaplast Baume B5 cream, L'Oreal) containing panthenol 5%, madecassoside, copper, zinc, and manganese to one side of the face for 28 days reduces decrustation time by approximately one day when compared with a control emollient. Redness and swelling were lower at 3 days, but there was no difference in pain and burning (105742). It is unclear if these effects are due to pantothenic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for MS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Muscular dystrophy. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for muscular dystrophy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Nipple fissures. Although there is interest in using topical pantothenic acid for nipple fissures, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Obesity. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for obesity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Pain (chronic). It is unclear if oral or topical pantothenic acid is beneficial for the management of various forms of chronic pain. Details: Although there is interest in using oral or topical pantothenic acid for various forms of chronic pain, including neuropathy and arthritis, there is limited information available about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this purpose. One review of preliminary clinical research found that calcium pantothenate does not reduce symptoms of arthritis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis (10433).
• Parkinson disease. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for Parkinson disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Poison oak and poison ivy dermatitis. Although there is interest in using topical pantothenic acid for poison ivy dermatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Postoperative pain. It is unclear if oral pantothenic acid is beneficial for postoperative pain. Details: In post-tonsillectomy patients aged 5-12 years, preliminary clinical research shows that taking pastilles containing dexpanthenol (Bepanthene, Bayer) 100 mg three times daily reduces pain when compared with placebo. Postoperative pain was modestly reduced at 1, 3, 7, and 14 days after surgery (105191).
• Postoperative sore throat. It is unclear if pantothenic acid lozenges are beneficial for postoperative sore throat. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking two lozenges containing dexpanthenol, an analog of pantothenic acid, 200 mg 30 minutes prior to general anesthesia reduces the incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat when compared with a benzydamine hydrochloride or placebo spray (67792).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for pregnancy-related leg cramps, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for PMS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Respiratory tract infections. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for respiratory tract infections, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Rhinosinusitis. It is unclear if nasal dexpanthenol is beneficial for rhinosinusitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that using a nasal spray (MarPlus) containing dexpanthenol, an analog of pantothenic acid, on the first, second, fourth, and sixth week after endoscopic sinus surgery reduces nasal discharge, but not other symptoms associated with chronic rhinosinusitis, when compared with saline nasal spray (67808).
• Skin irritation. It is unclear if topical dexpanthenol is beneficial for preventing or treating skin irritation due to sodium lauryl sulfate. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying dexpanthenol (Bepanthol Handbalsam), an analog of pantothenic acid, twice daily for 26 days does not prevent sodium lauryl sulfate-induced skin irritation (67785). However, dexpanthenol may be effective for treating skin irritation caused by sodium lauryl sulfate. Use of an ointment containing dexpanthenol 1% to 5% twice daily for up to 30 days following skin exposure to sodium lauryl sulfate seems to reduce skin water loss, skin roughness, and skin inflammation when compared to control (67802,67806).
• Ulcerative colitis. Although there is interest in using oral or rectal pantothenic acid for ulcerative colitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Vertigo. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for vertigo, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Wound healing. Preliminary clinical research suggests that oral dexpanthenol might be beneficial for wound healing. Details: In post-tonsillectomy patients aged 5-12 years, preliminary clinical research shows that taking pastilles containing dexpanthenol (Bepanthene, Bayer) 100 mg three times daily improves wound healing when compared with placebo. Depending on the type of surgery, wound healing occurred in 2.3-2.9 times as many patients within 7 days of surgery, and in 13% to 35% more patients within 14 days, when compared with placebo (105191). More evidence is needed to rate pantothenic acid for these uses.

(Read more about PANTOTHENIC ACID)

EFFECTIVE

• Hypokalemia. Oral or intravenous potassium can treat and prevent hypokalemia. Details: Administering potassium orally or intravenously is effective for treating and preventing hypokalemia (15,107970). Oral potassium 20 mEq (780 mg of elemental potassium) is typically taken once daily to prevent hypokalemia (15,95010). Oral potassium 40-100 mEq (1560-3900 mg of elemental potassium) is typically taken in 2-5 divided doses daily to treat hypokalemia (95010). Doses should be limited to 40 mEq (1560 mg of elemental potassium), and the total dose should not exceed 200 mEq (7800 mg of elemental potassium) in 24 hours (95010). Potassium supplementation and route of administration should be individualized based on serum potassium level and patient status (15,107970).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Hypertension. Oral potassium, via dietary intake or supplementation, reduces blood pressure. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary potassium consumption is associated with a lower risk of developing hypertension (1310,8817,69512). Additionally, most clinical research shows that potassium, taken orally as part of the diet or as a supplement, reduces systolic blood pressure by about 3-9.5 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by about 2-6.4 mmHg in patients with or without hypertension (3385,92104,92106,95624,107974). In most of these studies, daily intake of potassium typically ranged from about 1500-7800 mg, with the most common intake being about 2340-2540 mg daily (92104,95624). However, some research shows that taking potassium does not lower systolic or diastolic blood pressure (69541,69550,107966). Differences in the patient populations, potassium intake, and salt intake could have contributed to the conflicting results. Potassium seems to be more effective for people with hypertension, low potassium levels, high daily sodium intake, and for Black adults (3384,3385,3386,92104,92106). Some research also shows that the greatest blood pressure-lowering effects of potassium occur at doses of about 3900-7800 mg daily (95624). A meta-analysis of clinical trials using a novel computational technique to assess both potassium intake and excretion suggests that the optimal blood pressure reduction occurs when taking about 1500 mg supplemental potassium daily or an overall intake of 4500-6500 mg potassium daily (105448). This analysis is limited by the heterogeneity and short duration of the included trials. There is also interest in utilizing low-sodium, high-potassium food substitutes to treat hypertension. Research shows that using salt substitutes containing 25% to 30% potassium chloride reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 3-4.6 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, when compared with regular table salt (107971,107976). In 2017, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) published guidelines recommending that patients with hypertension consume 3500-5000 mg of potassium daily (95680). This intake of potassium is expected to lower systolic blood pressure by about 4-5 mmHg in patients with hypertension and by about 2 mmHg in normotensive patients (3385). Although potassium supplements and dietary potassium both seem to be beneficial, the guidelines recommend getting potassium from dietary sources, since potassium-rich diets are usually heart-healthy (95680). Additionally, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Oral prescription potassium citrate reduces the risk of kidney stone recurrence. It is unclear if non-prescription potassium citrate would be beneficial. Details: The American Urological Association (AUA) recommends potassium citrate therapy for patients with recurrent calcium stones and low urinary citrate, those with recurrent calcium or calcium oxalate stones without current metabolic abnormalities, and those with uric acid or cystine stones. The citrate component reduces urine calcium excretion and increases urine citrate and urine pH, which in turn alleviates crystal growth, formation, and aggregation. Sodium citrate may also be used to prevent stone recurrence; however, due to sodium's propensity to increase urine calcium excretion, potassium citrate remains the preferred salt formulation (107972). It is important to note that potassium citrate supplements are not equivalent to prescription potassium citrate products. Dose and duration of treatment is determined by a healthcare professional and individualized based on a patient's urinary citrate levels (107975,107989). Serum potassium levels should be monitored prior to starting potassium citrate, within 2 weeks of treatment initiation, and every 12 months (107975).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Eating foods high in potassium and low in sodium might reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. It is unclear if taking potassium supplements has the same benefit. Details: Large population studies in adults without prior CVD have found that higher dietary potassium intake is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events (109395,109399). One study found that daily potassium intake of about 3300 mg is associated with a 13% reduction in CVD risk when compared with intake of about 1920 mg (109399). The other study found that each additional 1000 mg of daily urinary potassium excretion, which is a marker of dietary intake, is associated with an 18% reduction in CVD risk (109395). Another observational study in over 15,000 adults with history of stroke or hypertension shows that replacing regular table salt with a substitute product containing 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride for an average of 5 years decreases the rate of stroke, major cardiovascular events, or death (107976). High quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this association. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).
• Stroke. Eating foods high in potassium and low in sodium might reduce the risk of stroke. It is unclear if taking potassium supplements has the same benefit. Details: Higher dietary intake of potassium seems to be associated with a lower risk of stroke. Population research has found that increasing dietary potassium intake by 1-1.5 grams daily is associated with up to a 20% reduced risk of stroke (92105,92107). Some population research has found that higher supplemental intake of potassium is associated with a 29% reduced risk of ischemic stroke. However, supplemental potassium intake is not found to be associated with a lower risk of hemorrhagic or total stroke (92107). An observational study in over 15,000 adults with history of stroke or hypertension shows that replacing regular table salt with a substitute product containing 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride for an average of 5 years decreases the rate of stroke, major cardiovascular events, or death (107976). High quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this association. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Dental hypersensitivity. It is unclear if topical potassium improves dental hypersensitivity. Details: One meta-analysis of clinical research shows that using a dentifrice containing 5% potassium nitrite reduces dentin sensitivity when compared with a dentifrice that does not contain potassium nitrite (69549). Other clinical research published in a systematic review shows that potassium-containing toothpastes might reduce dentin sensitivity more than controls that do not contain potassium. However, these toothpastes might be less effective than other active toothpastes, such as those containing sodium monofluorophosphate, and the effect may result from a placebo effect, since the mechanism of action of potassium is unclear (69456).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if increasing dietary potassium reduces the risk of diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of 7 large population studies has found that consuming dietary potassium 3300-3500 mg daily is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of diabetes when compared with consumption below 1000 mg daily. Results were similar when studies that measured potassium intake with a dietary questionnaire were analyzed separately from those that measured intake based on urinary potassium excretion (110776). However, the validity of this finding is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies. Furthermore, despite use of data from various databases, most studies included in the analysis were conducted by the same author.
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral potassium improves glycemic control in prediabetes. Details: A small clinical study in Black patients with prediabetes shows that taking extended-release potassium (Klor-Con M10, Cardinal Health) 40 mEq daily as potassium chloride for 3 months does not improve glucose tolerance when compared with placebo. Although fasting glucose levels were slightly reduced in the potassium group when compared with placebo, both groups experienced a worsening of glucose intolerance, with no change in insulin levels or glycated hemoglobin (98533).
• Osteoporosis. Although there is interest in using oral potassium for osteoporosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of potassium for this condition.
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral potassium improves physical performance in older adults. Details: Observational research in older adults has found that decreased dietary potassium intake and increased dietary sodium intake over 5 years is associated with worsened physical performance (105450).
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral potassium is beneficial in patients with SLE. Details: Observational research in patients with SLE has found that increased dietary potassium intake is not associated with improvements in disease activity scores or markers of cardiovascular disease, including lipid levels and blood pressure, when compared with low dietary potassium intake. However, higher potassium intake does seem to reduce the odds of having elevated levels of C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation, in these patients (109397). More evidence is needed to rate potassium for these uses.

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

EFFECTIVE

• Ariboflavinosis. Oral riboflavin can treat and prevent low riboflavin levels.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Hyperhomocysteinemia. Oral riboflavin reduces homocysteine levels in individuals with the MTHFR 677 TT genotype. It does not seem to provide benefit in individuals with other genotypes. Details: Population research has found that poor riboflavin status is associated with high homocysteine levels in individuals with the 677 TT genotype for the MTHFR enzyme (71386,71403,71409). Taking riboflavin 1.6 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces homocysteine levels by 22% to 40% in individuals with the 677 TT genotype of MTHFR when compared with pretreatment. However, riboflavin supplementation does not seem to reduce homocysteine levels in individuals with the 677 CC or CT genotypes (71443).
• Migraine headache. Oral riboflavin modestly reduces migraine attack frequency and severity in adults. The benefits of oral riboflavin in children are unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of 5 small clinical trials in adults with migraine shows that taking riboflavin 100-400 mg daily, alone or in combination with other natural ingredients, for three months modestly reduces migraine duration, frequency, and pain scores when compared with control (105480). These findings are limited by significant heterogeneity. Most clinical studies compared riboflavin 400 mg daily with placebo, no treatment, or an active control (1396,1397,1398,12387,105480). Limited evidence also suggests that taking riboflavin 400 mg daily might be no different for migraine prevention than certain conventional treatments such as bisoprolol 10 mg, metoprolol 200 mg, propranolol 80 mg, or valproate 500 mg (1396,105480). These findings are limited due to small study size and a lack of power to detect a difference between groups. Limited research has also evaluated riboflavin in children. A network meta-analysis of 3 small clinical trials in children with migraine shows that taking oral riboflavin 100-200 mg daily for 4-12 months does not significantly reduce incidence of migraine when compared with placebo. However, there was a non-significant trend towards reduced migraine frequency. Furthermore, conventional treatments such as propranolol, pregabalin, valproate, and topiramate were not shown to be significantly better than riboflavin for migraine prevention (105484). These findings are limited by small population sizes and insufficient power to detect differences between groups. Although riboflavin 100-200 mg has been used in prospective clinical studies, small observational studies have found some benefit in children taking riboflavin doses as low as 10-40 mg daily and as high as 400 mg daily for 3-4 months (105481,105485). Riboflavin has also been studied in combination with other ingredients, with research suggesting potential benefit. Specifically, riboflavin 400 mg has been combined with magnesium 600 mg and coenzyme Q10 150 mg daily (Dolovent; Linpharma Inc.) (92101), and also with magnesium 300 mg and feverfew 100 mg daily (12389).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Although there is interest in using oral riboflavin for acne, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of riboflavin for this purpose.
• Alzheimer disease. Although there is interest in using oral riboflavin for Alzheimer disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of riboflavin for this condition.
• Anxiety. It is unclear if oral riboflavin is beneficial for anxiety. Details: A large observational cohort study in adults suggests that a dietary riboflavin intake above 2.1 mg daily is associated with a 5% lower prevalence of anxiety when compared with a riboflavin intake less than 1.6 mg daily. Subgroup analysis suggests that this association is especially strong in males (111209).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if oral riboflavin can prevent mortality due to CVD. Details: Epidemiological research has found that dietary and supplemental riboflavin intake in the highest quartile, around 3.4 mg daily, is associated with a 47% lower risk of CVD mortality when compared with riboflavin intake in the lowest quartile, around 1 mg daily. The reduction in CVD mortality with riboflavin was enhanced by higher folate intake (110727). The validity of this finding is limited by the fact that dietary riboflavin intake was based on 2-day dietary recall.
• Carpal tunnel syndrome. Although there is interest in using oral riboflavin for carpal tunnel syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of riboflavin for this purpose.
• Cataracts. It is unclear if oral riboflavin is beneficial in patients with cataracts. Details: Observational research has found that high dietary intake of riboflavin is associated with a reduced risk of nuclear cataracts and age-related lens opacification (6378,14301). Furthermore, a clinical study in Chinese patients with nutrient deficiencies shows that taking a combination of riboflavin 3 mg plus niacin 40 mg daily also seems to reduce the risk of developing nuclear cataracts when compared with no supplementation (4885). It is unclear if the benefit is due to riboflavin, niacin, or the combination.
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral riboflavin helps to prevent cervical cancer. Details: Epidemiological evidence has found that increased riboflavin intake from dietary and supplement sources, along with other B vitamins, is associated with a reduced risk of precancerous cervical lesions (11074).
• Cognitive function. Oral riboflavin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in healthy adults aged 40-65 years shows that taking a combination supplement containing riboflavin 70 mg, other group B vitamins, ginkgo leaf, and bacopa daily for 12 weeks does not improve measures of memory, attention, cognition, mood, or stress reactivity when compared with placebo (111334).
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral riboflavin reduces colorectal cancer risk. Details: Epidemiological evidence in a Chinese population suggests that increased dietary intake of riboflavin is associated with a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (105482).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral riboflavin is beneficial for depression. Details: A large cross-sectional study in middle-aged adults suggests that dietary riboflavin intake above 2.1 mg daily is associated with an 8% lower prevalence of depression when compared with a riboflavin intake less than 1.6 mg daily. Subgroup analysis suggests that this association is especially strong in males (111209).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral riboflavin reduces the risk of developing gestational diabetes. Details: A large prospective cohort study in pregnant adults shows that supplementation with riboflavin at doses over 2.5 mg daily during the first trimester and 2.1 mg daily in the second trimester is associated with a lower risk of developing gestational diabetes when compared with riboflavin doses under 1.1 mg daily. However, this effect was not found for dietary intake of riboflavin, only supplementation. Additionally, the participants were mostly Han Chinese adults, limiting the generalizability of the findings to other populations (111680).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Intravenous and oral riboflavin have only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; riboflavin's effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that intravenous administration of a specific combination product containing succinic acid, inosine, nicotinamide, and riboflavin (Cytoflavin, Polysan) daily for 10 days followed by an oral formulation of the same product, taken daily for 76 days, reduces symptoms of diabetic neuropathy including paresthesia, numbness, and burning when compared with placebo (110503). It is unclear if these findings are due to riboflavin, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if oral riboflavin reduces esophageal cancer risk. Details: Population research in Iranian patients has found that low riboflavin status is associated with a two-fold increase in the risk of esophageal cancer (71439). However, not all evidence agrees. Preliminary clinical studies in Chinese individuals with esophageal dysplasia shows that taking riboflavin, alone or in combination with calcium or niacin, for 3-5 years does not seem to reduce the risk of esophageal cancer in patients when compared with baseline or control (4679,63576,71488). Taking riboflavin 200 mg weekly, in combination with retinol 15 mg and zinc 50 mg, also does not seem to be beneficial in this patient population (71501). It is unclear if these findings are generalizable to geographic locations other than China and Iran.
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral riboflavin reduces colorectal cancer risk. Details: Low quality clinical research in a Chinese population shows that taking riboflavin in combination with niacin does not reduce the risk of gastric cancer when compared with control (4679).
• Hypertension. There is limited evidence on the oral use of riboflavin for reducing blood pressure in patients with the MTHFR 677 TT genotype. Details: A 677 C to T polymorphism on the MTHFR gene has been associated with hypertension. In patients with a confirmed MTHFR 677 TT genotype and premature cardiovascular disease, preliminary clinical research suggests that taking riboflavin 1.6 mg daily for 16 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 9 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 6 mmHg when compared with placebo. This decrease in blood pressure is larger than that reported in other trials, which may be due to the fact that only patients with the 677 TT genotype were included. These patients seem to respond to riboflavin therapy more so than patients with 677 CC or 677 CT genotype (92102). Additional clinical research in patients with the 677 TT genotype but without cardiovascular disease shows that taking riboflavin 1.6 mg daily for 16 weeks reduces SBP by 5.6 mmHg but does not reduce DBP (92103). There is also interest in using dietary riboflavin for reducing the onset of hypertension. Some epidemiological evidence in a Chinese population has found that increased dietary intake of riboflavin is associated with a reduced risk of developing hypertension (105483).
• Liver cancer. Oral riboflavin has only been evaluated in combination with niacin; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in Chinese individuals older than 55 years shows that taking riboflavin in combination with niacin does not seem to prevent liver cancer mortality when compared with control. However, there was a reduced risk of liver cancer mortality in people aged less than 55 years when compared with control (63470).
• Lung cancer. Oral riboflavin has only been evaluated in combination with niacin; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in Chinese individuals shows that taking riboflavin in combination with niacin does not appear to reduce the risk of lung cancer when compared with control (34539).
• Malaria. Oral riboflavin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children ages 5-14 years living in Gambia and at high risk for malaria exposure suggests that taking riboflavin, in combination with iron, thiamine, and vitamin C, for 3 months does not reduce the frequency or severity of malaria infections when compared with placebo (56730).
• Malnutrition. There is limited evidence on the oral use of riboflavin with other ingredients in children at risk for kwashiorkor. Details: A clinical study in Malawian children at risk for kwashiorkor, a severe form of malnutrition, suggests that taking riboflavin, vitamin E, selenium, and N-acetyl cysteine at a dose of three times the recommended dietary allowance does not prevent kwashiorkor, reduce edema, increase physical growth, or reduce infection when compared with placebo (71433).
• Mitochondrial myopathies. Although there is interest in using oral riboflavin for mitochondrial myopathies, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of riboflavin for this condition.
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). It is unclear if oral riboflavin slows the progression of MS-related disability. Details: A small clinical study in patients with relapsing-remitting MS or secondary progressive MS who are undergoing treatment with disease-modifying therapies suggests that taking oral riboflavin 10 mg daily for six months is no more effective for improving disability than placebo (91752). The validity of this finding is limited by the small study sample size.
• Oral leukoplakia. It is unclear if oral riboflavin prevents or slows progression of oral leukoplakia. Details: Population research in people living in Uzbekistan suggests that low blood levels of riboflavin are associated with an increased prevalence of oral leukoplakia (71502). However, clinical evidence in patients with a high occurrence of oral and esophageal cancer who are living in Uzbekistan suggests that taking riboflavin 80 mg weekly for 20 months does not improve the prevalence or progression of oral leukoplakia when compared to baseline (71565). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a placebo group and unusual once weekly dosing. Furthermore, it is unclear if these results are generalizable to other geographic locations.
• Pre-eclampsia. Although there is interest in using oral riboflavin for pre-eclampsia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of riboflavin for this purpose.
• Pregnancy-related iron deficiency. It is unclear if oral riboflavin is beneficial in patients with iron deficiency due to pregnancy. Details: Preliminary clinical research in pregnant patients in China suggests that adding riboflavin 1 mg daily to supplemental iron and folic acid does not improve iron status when compared with taking iron and folic acid alone (71480).
• Sickle cell disease. It is unclear if oral riboflavin is beneficial in patients with sickle cell disease. Details: One small clinical study in patients with sickle cell disease suggests that taking riboflavin 5 mg twice daily for 8 weeks increases serum iron and transferrin saturation when compared to baseline; however, riboflavin does not seem to improve serum ferritin or circulating hemoglobin levels (71566).
• Stroke. Oral riboflavin has only been evaluated in combination with niacin; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in Chinese individuals with poor nutritional status who are at risk for stroke suggests that taking riboflavin 5.2 mg daily in combination with niacin 40 mg daily does not reduce the risk of stroke-related mortality (2673). More evidence is needed to rate riboflavin for these uses.

(Read more about RIBOFLAVIN)

EFFECTIVE

• Thiamine deficiency. Oral thiamine prevents and treats thiamine deficiency syndromes. Details: Thiamine deficiency is treated with oral thiamine 5-30 mg daily as a single dose or in divided daily doses for one month. For severe deficiency, thiamine up to 300 mg daily can be used (15).Thiamine deficiency can occur in people with malabsorption conditions such as alcohol use disorder, cirrhosis, and gastrointestinal diseases; in those with inadequate intake due to anorexia, nausea, and vomiting; and in those with increased requirements, including pregnancy, increased carbohydrate intake, increased physical activity, hyperthyroidism, infection, and liver disease. However, deficiency is rare with these conditions (15). The elderly might also be at increased risk for subclinical thiamine deficiency (11076).
• Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome (WKS). Parenteral thiamine is effective for treating symptoms of WKS. Details: Parenteral administration of thiamine 5-200 mg daily for 2 days decreases the risk of developing WKS and decreases symptoms of WKS in acute alcohol withdrawal. Between 30% and 80% of alcoholics are suspected to have thiamine deficiency (11075). An optimal dose for treating WKS has not been established; however, early research suggests that a 200 mg intramuscular dose may be more effective than lower doses (11075). In contrast, a moderate-sized clinical trial in adults with a history of heavy alcohol use who were asymptomatic or symptomatic for WKS shows that there is no benefit to administering high doses (300 mg 3 times daily) compared with medium (100 mg 3 times daily) or low (100 mg daily) doses of parenteral thiamine on cognitive or neurological functioning (111690). The study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Dysmenorrhea. Oral thiamine might reduce pain in some patients with dysmenorrhea. Details: A clinical study in adolescent Iranian females with dysmenorrhea shows that taking thiamine 100 mg alone or along with fish oil 500 mg daily for 2 months moderately reduces pain intensity and duration when compared with placebo (89341). Another preliminary clinical study in Indian females 12-21 years of age with moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhea shows that taking thiamine 100 mg daily for 90 days eliminates pain in 87% of participants when compared to baseline (77820). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a placebo group. Furthermore, available research was conducted in India and Iran, so it is unclear if these findings are generalizable to other geographic locations.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Intravenous thiamine does not seem to improve outcomes after CABG surgery. Details: A small clinical study in adults undergoing CABG surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass shows that giving intravenous thiamine 200 mg immediately prior to surgery and immediately after surgery does not improve clinical outcomes or lactate levels when compared with placebo (97010). Larger doses of thiamine also don't seem to be beneficial. Another small clinical study in patients receiving CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass shows that giving thiamine 600 mg intravenously on the day of surgery, and 400 mg daily for three postoperative days, does not improve postoperative outcomes when compared with placebo (103000).
• Heart failure. Most research suggests that oral or intravenous thiamine does not improve outcomes in patients with heart failure. Details: Observational research suggests that having heart failure is associated with 2.5-fold increased odds of having thiamine deficiency, possibly because of diuretic use, intestinal malabsorption, and metabolism changes. However, it is unclear if thiamine supplementation is beneficial. A meta-analysis of 2 small clinical trials in adults with systolic heart failure and unclear thiamine status shows that thiamine 200-300 mg given orally or by IV for 7-28 days improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by 3% when compared with control (97012). However, other meta-analyses and clinical studies in adults with heart failure with or without thiamine deficiency show that taking intravenous, intramuscular, or oral thiamine 100-500 mg daily does not improve LVEF fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, dyspnea, mortality, hospitalization, or exercise tolerance when compared with placebo or control (103002,111682,111686,111688).
• Mosquito repellent. Oral thiamine does not seem to repel mosquitos. Details: Clinical research in healthy volunteers shows that taking thiamine does not improve mosquito repellency when compared with taking vitamin C as a control (18016).
• Sepsis. Intravenous or oral thiamine, alone or in combination with vitamin C and hydrocortisone, does not seem to reduce mortality or prevent organ failure in sepsis or septic shock. Details: Multiple meta-analyses of small clinical studies in patients with septic shock show that intravenous or oral thiamine 100-500 mg 2-3 times daily for 3-7 days is no better than placebo for improving mortality, end-organ damage, number of ventilator-free days, and duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (105443,107717,107727,111689). One meta-analysis suggests that administration of thiamine alone increases the risk of mortality in these patients (111689). Subgroup analyses including only higher quality studies also fail to show a benefit of thiamine (107717). Another recent small clinical trial in patients with septic shock shows that receiving the same dose of intravenous thiamine does not increase vasopressor-free days when compared with placebo (105441). Intravenous thiamine 200 mg every 12 hours has also been evaluated in combination with intravenous vitamin C 1.5-2 grams and hydrocortisone 50-200 mg every 6-12 hours for 4-10 days (HAT therapy). While some retrospective research found HAT therapy to be beneficial (100315,102980,111689), high-quality, prospective clinical research has shown no benefit (105447,109956,111689). Meta-analyses in patients with sepsis and septic shock shows that receiving HAT therapy does not improve mortality, kidney injury, number of ventilator-free days, or ICU length of stay when compared with control (102129,104027,104028,104032,102998,105447,109956,111642,111689). Additionally, the meta-analyses suggest that HAT therapy does not reverse shock or improve sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores (109556,111642). However, one meta-analysis found that HAT therapy shortened the duration of vasopressor use when compared with placebo (111642). Long-term follow up from a study in patients with sepsis-induced respiratory and/or cardiovascular dysfunction shows that receiving HAT therapy does not improve cognitive, psychological, or functional status after 6 months and, for immediate memory scores and development of posttraumatic stress disorder, HAT therapy was less beneficial when compared with placebo (111299).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acute kidney injury (AKI). It is unclear if oral or intravenous thiamine is beneficial for treating or preventing AKI. Details: Observational research in adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with AKI has found that treatment with thiamine (dose unspecified) within the first 48 hours of admission is associated with 39% lower odds of in-hospital mortality and 28% higher odds of kidney function recovery when compared with patients that did not receive thiamine. Receiving thiamine was also associated with a 0.5-day reduction in ICU length of stay (107719).
• Anxiety. Although there is interest in using oral thiamine for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of thiamine for this purpose.
• Cardiac arrest. It is unclear if intravenous thiamine reduces the risk of death after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Details: A small clinical study in adults resuscitated from cardiac arrest shows that receiving intravenous thiamine 100 mg every 8 hours for 7 days does not reduce 28-day mortality when compare with a normal saline placebo (105442).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial for treating or preventing CVD. Details: Population research in Korea has found that insufficient dietary thiamine intake (daily intake of less than 1.22 mg in males or 1.03 mg in females) is associated with a 16% increased odds of developing angina or myocardial infarction when compared with sufficient dietary thiamine. However, the effects of thiamine supplementation on CVD have not been studied (107725).
• Cataracts. Small studies suggest that increased dietary thiamine might help prevent cataracts. Details: Observational research has found that a high dietary intake of thiamine 10 mg daily is associated with 40% lower odds of nuclear cataracts (6378). Other population research has found that higher dietary intake of thiamine is associated with a modestly reduced risk of age-related lens opacification (14301).
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral thiamine reduces the risk of developing cervical cancer. Details: Epidemiological research has found that increasing intake of thiamine from dietary and supplemental sources, along with folic acid, riboflavin, and vitamin B12, is associated with a lower odds of precancerous cervical lesions (11074).
• Child development. It is unclear if supplementing breastfeeding females with oral thiamine improves infant neurocognitive development. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that supplementing breastfeeding females with oral thiamine, 1.2-10 mg daily for 22 weeks, starting at 2 weeks postpartum, does not improve most cognitive or neurodevelopmental scores in the child when compared with placebo. However, one subgroup analysis suggests that thiamine supplementation may improve language scores (107726).
• Cognitive function. Oral thiamine has only been studied in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in healthy, middle-aged adults shows that taking a combination product containing thiamine hydrochloride 50 mg, other group B vitamins, bacopa, and ginkgo daily for 12 weeks does not improve measures of memory, attention, cognition, mood, or stress reactivity when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis shows a possible benefit of the combination supplementation on measures of attention in those with an optimal diet at baseline (111334). It is unclear if these findings are due to thiamine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if intravenous or oral thiamine improves clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Details: A small observational study of adults admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 has found that treatment with intravenous or oral thiamine 100 mg daily for an average of 7 days is associated with a 63% reduction in the odds of death within 30 days when compared with control. However, there was no associated reduction in duration of hospitalization or mechanical ventilation (107721). In addition, a small observational study of adults with encephalopathy that were mechanically ventilated secondary to COVID-19 has found that taking thiamine 500 mg three times daily orally for 5 days improves neurological manifestations, including ophthalmoparesis and ataxia, when compared with baseline. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group (107722).
• Critical illness (trauma). It is unclear if oral or intravenous thiamine is beneficial in patients with critical illness. Details: A meta-analysis of critically ill patients shows that treatment with oral or intravenous thiamine 100-600 mg daily for up to 7 days does not affect the need for mechanical ventilation, duration of hospital stay, or mortality when compared with control (107727).
• Delirium. It is unclear if oral or intravenous thiamine helps to prevent or treat delirium. Details: In critically ill patients, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that treatment with oral or intravenous thiamine 100-600 mg daily for up to 7 days reduces the odds of developing delirium by 42% when compared with control (107727). However, some observational research in adults with septic shock has found that receiving intravenous thiamine 400 mg daily with vitamin C 6 grams daily, both in divided doses, is not associated with reduced delirium when compared with control (103001). In non-critically ill, hospitalized adults with altered mental status, retrospective, observational research has also found that administration of oral or intravenous thiamine is not associated with improved cognitive function or reduced in-hospital mortality when compared with control (107723). Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant also shows that administering thiamine 200 mg three times a day intravenously for 7 days does not prevent delirium or shorten duration of delirium when compared with placebo (107718).
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial for the prevention of dementia. Details: Observational research in patients with alcohol use disorder has found that taking thiamine is associated with a 24% to 46% lower risk of developing dementia when compared with not taking thiamine (102999).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial in patients with depression. Details: Meta-analyses of population research in adults has found that high dietary consumption of thiamine is associated with a 10% to 31% lower risk of having depression when compared with low dietary consumption of thiamine. However, this research did not evaluate the effects of thiamine supplementation on depression (107133,107725). One small clinical study in adults with major depressive disorder shows that taking thiamine 300 mg daily in conjunction with fluoxetine 20 mg daily leads to greater improvements in depressive symptoms at 6 weeks when compared to fluoxetine with placebo. This benefit was no longer present at 12 weeks. This suggests that thiamine may accelerate improvement in symptoms during initiation of fluoxetine therapy (97013).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial for type 2 diabetes or gestational diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking thiamine 100-300 mg or its derivative benfotiamine 120-900 mg daily for 1-3 months does not reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose, or postprandial blood glucose when compared with placebo (111681). A large, prospective cohort study in adults without type 2 diabetes suggests that the risk of new-onset diabetes is minimized in adults consuming thiamine 0.75-1.10 mg daily from the diet, while lower and higher thiamine intake levels are associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes (111685). Thiamine has also been studied for preventing gestational diabetes. A large, prospective cohort study in pregnant adults suggests that higher supplementation with thiamine during the first and second trimesters is associated with a lower risk of gestational diabetes when compared with lower levels of total thiamine intake. However, this effect was not found for dietary intake of thiamine, only supplementation. Additionally, the participants were mostly Han Chinese adults, limiting the generalizability of the findings to other populations (111680).
• Diabetic nephropathy. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial for diabetic nephropathy. Details: A small clinical study in patients with early-stage diabetic nephropathy and microalbuminuria shows that taking thiamine 100 mg three times daily for 3 months decreases urinary albumin excretion, but does not affect glomerular filtration rate (GFR), when compared with placebo (16556).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Although there is interest in using oral thiamine for diabetic neuropathy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of thiamine for this condition.
• Dry eye. Oral thiamine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with dry eye suggests that adding unspecified doses of thiamine and mecobalamin to treatment with daily artificial tears and corticosteroid drops might slightly improve overall symptoms when compared with only artificial tears and corticosteroid drops for 1 month. There were no differences between groups at 2 months (105444). This finding is limited due to incomplete reporting and a lack of adjustment for multiple hypothesis testing.
• Dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial for treating or preventing dyslipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking thiamine 100-300 mg or its derivative benfotiamine 120-900 mg daily for 1-3 months does not improve low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglycerides when compared with placebo (111681). Observational research in Korea suggests that insufficient dietary thiamine intake (daily intake of less than 1.22 mg in males or 1.03 mg in females) is associated with 10% higher odds of developing dyslipidemia when compared with sufficient dietary thiamine intake. However, the effects of thiamine supplementation on dyslipidemia have not been studied (107725).
• Emergence delirium. It is unclear if intravenous thiamine helps to prevent emergence delirium in patients after surgery. Details: One clinical study in adults in the intensive care unit (ICU) after gastrointestinal surgery shows that receiving intravenous thiamine 200 mg daily for 3 days is associated with up to 84% lower odds of emergence delirium on the first two days, but not on the third day, when compared with a normal saline control (105440).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial in patients with fatigue. Details: A small clinical crossover study in patients with chronic fatigue and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) shows that taking thiamine 600-1800 mg daily for 20 days reduces fatigue scores when compared with placebo (105438). Taking oral thiamine 300 mg daily for an additional 12 weeks did not seem to affect fatigue scores when compared with placebo. However, an observational follow-up study found that those who self-continued thiamine for an additional 24 weeks after the study ended reported lower fatigue scores when compared with those who did not self-continue thiamine (107720).
• Glaucoma. Although there is interest in using oral thiamine for glaucoma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of thiamine for this condition.
• Herpes zoster (shingles). It is unclear if subcutaneous thiamine is beneficial in patients with shingles. Details: A small clinical trial shows that receiving subcutaneous thiamine 100 mg injections six times weekly for 4 weeks reduces itching by at least 30% in 67% of patients with herpes zoster. However, thiamine does not appear to significantly reduce pain in most patients (90396).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial in treating or preventing hypertension. Details: Population research in Korea has found that insufficient dietary thiamine intake (daily intake of less than 1.22 mg in males or 1.03 mg in females) is associated with a 5% increased odds of developing hypertension when compared with sufficient dietary thiamine. However, the effects of thiamine supplementation on hypertension have not been studied (107725).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial in patients with prediabetes. Details: A very small clinical trial in patients with prediabetes shows that taking thiamine 100 mg by mouth three times daily for 6 weeks modestly decreases 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose levels when compared to baseline and decreases fasting blood glucose levels when compared with placebo (91168).
• Kidney failure. Oral thiamine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary, low-quality, clinical research in adults with kidney failure undergoing regular hemodialysis shows that taking oral thiamine 90 mg daily with folic acid 30 mg daily for 96 weeks reduces overall mortality by 67% and improves cognitive scores by 31% when compared with no intervention (107724). It is unclear if this effect is due to thiamine, folic acid, or the combination.
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if dietary thiamine is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of migraine headache. Details: A large, retrospective, cross-sectional study suggests that higher dietary intake of thiamine is associated with lower odds of severe headache or migraine, especially in females (111684). The validity of these effects is limited by the subjective outcome measures and retrospective study design.
• Pneumonia. It is unclear if thiamine is beneficial for patients with pneumonia. Details: A large retrospective cohort study in adults hospitalized with pneumonia and active alcohol use disorder suggests that parenteral administration of thiamine is associated with reduced 14-day mortality and more frequent discharges home, but not a shorter length of stay or fewer ICU transfers, when compared with no thiamine use. Furthermore, parenteral thiamine doses above 200 mg do not appear to improve mortality but may be associated with longer length of stay and less frequent discharges home when compared with low oral doses of thiamine or parenteral thiamine at doses under 200 mg (111679). The validity of these effects is limited by the retrospective study design.
• Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). It is unclear if oral or parenteral thiamine is beneficial for patients with VAP. Details: A retrospective study in adults with VAP in the intensive care unit (ICU) suggests that supplementation with intravenous or oral thiamine may be associated with reduced ICU and in-hospital mortality (111683). The validity of these effects is limited by the retrospective study design. More evidence is needed to rate thiamine for these uses.

(Read more about THIAMINE)

EFFECTIVE

• Vitamin A deficiency. Oral vitamin A is effective for treatment and prevention of vitamin A deficiency. Details: Clinical and observational research in children shows that taking vitamin A orally is effective for preventing and improving symptoms of vitamin A deficiency, including xerophthalmia, night blindness, and Bitot's spots (82329,82689,82710,90773). Vitamin A deficiency can occur due to abnormal storage and transport of vitamin A in people with abetalipoproteinemia, protein deficiency, diabetes mellitus, hyperthyroidism, fever, liver disease, and cystic fibrosis (7135). However, research suggests that supplementation with vitamin A may not be necessary for most newborns with vitamin A deficiency. An observational study in newborns with vitamin A levels of 0.43-0.59 mcmol/L or >0.59 mcmol/L found that vitamin A levels increased naturally over the first six months of life, regardless of oral vitamin A supplementation. However, in infants with very low vitamin A levels (<0.43 mcmol/L), vitamin A supplementation was associated with significant increases in vitamin A levels at 6 months of age when compared with no supplementation, suggesting that only newborns with very low vitamin A levels should receive oral vitamin A (107298).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Aging skin. Topical vitamin A (retinol) formulations seem to improve symptoms of aging skin, such as wrinkles and mottled pigmentation. Details: The vitamin A analog tretinoin (Renova) is a prescription drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for adjunctive use in reducing fine wrinkles, hyperpigmentation, and tactile roughness of aging facial skin (103711). However, this drug is not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, which have not been as extensively evaluated in clinical research. Although research evaluating non-prescription topical vitamin A shows benefit for reducing wrinkles, most studies have been small and used different formulations. One small study in adults over 40 years of age shows that applying a pea size amount of 0.075% retinol cream to the face daily for 26 weeks seems to reduce deep and fine wrinkling when compared with placebo. Applying a lower dose of 0.04% retinol cream for 13 weeks seems to reduce fine wrinkling to a lesser degree, with no effect on deep wrinkles, when compared with placebo cream (104458). Another small clinical study in adults over 80 years of age shows that applying 2 mL of retinol 0.4% lotion to the upper arm up to 3 times weekly for 24 weeks reduces visible wrinkles when compared with placebo (94683). Two small studies in females ages 33 to 65 show that applying retinol 0.15%, 0.3% and 0.5% in liquid crystal formulation once daily to the face for 2-3 months improves skin pigmentation, elasticity, and wrinkles when compared with baseline (103680,104464). The validity of these two studies is limited by the lack of a comparator treatment. Topical vitamin A is frequently combined with other ingredients in commercial formulations; however these combinations have rarely been studied. A small clinical study in adults over 35 years with skin aging shows that applying a cream containing retinol 0.5%, niacinamide, resveratrol, and hexylresorcinol seems to improve wrinkling and skin tone when compared with baseline (104455). Another small preliminary clinical trial in adults ages 35-65 years with periorbital lines and wrinkles shows that applying a cream containing retinol modestly improves dryness, puffiness, redness, and darkness when compared with baseline. The retinol was conjugated with lactic acid, and the cream contained other nutrient and herbal ingredients It was applied around the eyes each evening, sometimes used in combination with another product each morning (109747).
• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Intramuscular vitamin A may reduce the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in very low birth weight infants when given at a dose of 5000 IU three times weekly for 28 days. Lower doses do not seem to be effective. It is unclear if enteral vitamin A is beneficial for BPD. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 clinical trials in premature infants shows that intramuscular administration of vitamin A every other day or three times weekly for 28 days reduces the risk of BPD by around 33% when compared with control (107297). The results from this meta-analysis are primarily driven by a modestly sized clinical trial in very low birth weight infants which shows that intramuscular administration of vitamin A 5000 IU three times weekly for 28 days reduces the risk of BPD by 15% when compared with a sham control (82195). A subgroup analysis of this trial suggests that infants with the lowest BPD risk estimate based on gestational age, birth weight, sex, ethnicity, and oxygen levels 24 hours after birth appear to benefit more from vitamin A therapy than those with higher BPD risk estimates (107296). Previous research in this area utilized a lower dose of only 2000 IU every other day for 28 days, and showed no significant improvement in the rate of BPD (82331,82613). The evaluation of a higher dose was prompted by research noting that the lower doses evaluated in these earlier studies were unable to achieve serum retinol concentrations above 25 mcg/dL, while doses at or above 5000 IU three times weekly could reach this level (82731). Enteral vitamin A has also been investigated. Meta-analyses of two clinical trials show that supplementation with vitamin A at an average of 5,000 IU daily, staring within four days of birth, does not reduce the incidence of BPD when compared with placebo (109750,109753).
• Diarrhea. Vitamin A seems to reduce the incidence of diarrhea in young children. However, it is unclear if oral vitamin A while breastfeeding is beneficial for preventing diarrhea in nursing infants. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in children up to age 5 shows that vitamin A supplementation reduces the incidence of diarrhea by 15% and mortality related to diarrhea by 12% when compared with control, usually placebo or no supplementation (109755). However, one small clinical trial in breastfeeding parents shows that supplementation of vitamin A 1800 IU and ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) 600 IU daily for 2 months does not reduce the risk of diarrhea in the nursing infants when compared with placebo (107293).
• Measles. High-dose vitamin A, at recommended age-specific doses, seems to reduce mortality in children with measles under 2 years of age. Additionally, vitamin A may reduce the incidence of measles in children up to 5 years of age who are at risk for vitamin A deficiency. Details: Vitamin A deficiency is a known risk factor for severe measles, as well as measles-related morbidity and mortality. The use of vitamin A supplementation for the treatment of measles has been studied mostly in resource-limited countries with increased risk for vitamin A deficiency. However, measles infection has also been shown to deplete vitamin A stores, leading to recommendations for vitamin A supplementation in acute measles, regardless of geographic location (115976). Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking vitamin A does not reduce mortality in children with measles when all ages and/or doses are considered (82373,82502). However, a sub-analysis of 3 studies that utilized a higher dose of 200,000 IU orally daily for two days, in children under 2 years of age who were hospitalized with measles, shows that this dosing regimen reduces the relative risk of mortality by about 60% when compared with placebo (82373,82502). Additionally, vitamin A supplementation in children with measles may reduce the risk of some complications, such as croup (82373). Most studies in these analyses were conducted in regions with high measles case-fatality rates; the benefit of vitamin A supplementation in regions with lower case-fatality rates, such as the United States, is unclear. Based on these data, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends treatment with vitamin A, using age-specific doses, for all children with acute measles (115966). The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) also recommends the administration of age-specific doses to all children with measles, regardless of severity, as follows: 200,000 IU daily for 2 days in children at least one year of age, 100,000 IU daily for 2 days in children 6-12 months of age, and 50,000 IU daily for 2 days in children under 6 months old. In children with clinical symptoms of vitamin A deficiency, an additional age-specific dose is recommended 2-6 weeks later (115977). Vitamin A supplementation has also been studied in apparently healthy children living in regions at high risk for vitamin A deficiency. A meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies shows that taking vitamin A reduces the incidence of measles in children ages 6 months to 5 years. These studies provided vitamin A supplementation either as a single high dose or as three high doses over one year. In 3 studies, vitamin A was given in conjunction with measles vaccination; vaccination status was not provided for the other studies (109755). The WHO and AAP do not recommend the use of vitamin A for measles prevention. Instead, routine measles vaccination is recommended. Additionally, for people over 6 months of age with recent measles exposure who are unimmunized or insufficiently immunized, immediate measles vaccination is recommended (115966,115977).
• Night vision. Oral vitamin A as retinyl palmitate seems to reduce night blindness during pregnancy in malnourished patients. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin A (as retinyl palmitate) 23,000 IU weekly before and during pregnancy reduces pregnancy-related night blindness by 37% in malnourished patients (6154). Some evidence suggests that zinc supplements might potentiate the effects of vitamin A in restoring sight in zinc-deficient pregnant patients affected by night blindness (8630).
• Oral leukoplakia. High-dose oral vitamin A seems to reduce oral leukoplakia lesions in patients that chew tobacco and/or betel nut. Details: Clinical research in patients with tobacco and/or betel nut chewing habits shows that taking oral vitamin A 200,000-300,000 IU weekly for 6-12 months seems to result in remission of leukoplakia lesions in over 50% of participants when compared with placebo (34674,82617). However, it is unknown if vitamin A prevents the development of oral cancer from oral leukoplakia lesions.
• Overall mortality. In children at risk for vitamin A deficiency, oral vitamin A seems to reduce mortality. However, it does not seem to reduce mortality in healthy adults. Details: Despite previous debate on whether the programs supplying high-dose vitamin A in low- and middle-income countries with prevalent vitamin A deficiency are safe and effective for reducing child mortality, most experts, including World Health Organization, recommend high-dose vitamin A supplementation for those children (95055,95724,97170,109755). Meta-analyses including 8-18 clinical studies show that vitamin A supplementation reduces all-cause mortality by about 12%-26% in children 6 months to 5 years of age (82559,95055,115748), but does not seem to reduce mortality in neonates or children 1-6 months of age (115748). Notably, the largest clinical trial conducted to date (Deworming and Enhanced Vitamin A; DEVTA), which involved one million preschool children and was included in one of the previously discussed meta-analyses, suggests that high-dose vitamin A supplementation does not reduce mortality (90773). However, this trial was limited due to under-resourcing and undetermined patient consent and treatment compliance (90773). Adult mortality is not reduced by vitamin A supplementation. In fact, some evidence even shows that vitamin A supplementation increases mortality when administered to healthy adult patients or those with a stabilized disease (15305,34622,90775).
• Postpartum complications. Oral vitamin A seems to reduce postpartum diarrhea and mortality in malnourished patients. Details: A large clinical study in malnourished pregnant patients in Nepal shows that taking vitamin A (as retinyl palmitate) 23,000 IU weekly before, during, and after pregnancy reduces the occurrence of blood and mucus in the stool by 93% and the occurrence of diarrhea by up to 90% during the first 6 months postpartum when compared with placebo (2581). Another clinical study in the same population shows that taking vitamin A (as retinyl palmitate) 23,000 IU weekly before and during pregnancy reduces pregnancy-related mortality by 40% when compared with placebo (6153).
• Retinitis pigmentosa. Oral vitamin A supplementation in children with retinitis pigmentosa seems to slow retinal function decline. Details: Observational and clinical research in children with retinitis pigmentosa shows that taking an age-adjusted dose of vitamin A, up to a maximum dose of 15,000 IU daily, modestly attenuates the decline in retinal function when compared with control (83,97167,103677).
• Ulcerative colitis. Oral vitamin A supplementation in patients with ulcerative colitis seems to improve clinical response and mucosal healing. Details: A clinical study in adults with symptomatic ulcerative colitis despite treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid shows that taking vitamin A 25,000 IU daily for 2 months reduces disease severity and increases the rate of clinical response and mucosal healing when compared with placebo. The number needed to treat (NNT) for clinical response is 3; the NNT for mucosal healing is 5 (100329).
• Wrinkled skin. Topical vitamin A (retinol) formulations seem to improve photodamage and wrinkles. Details: The vitamin A analog tretinoin (Renova) is a prescription drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for adjunctive use in reducing fine wrinkles, hyperpigmentation, and tactile roughness of facial skin (103711). This drug is not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, which have not been as extensively evaluated in clinical research. Some research in females ages 35-65 with moderately wrinkled and photoaged skin suggests that commercially available retinol formulations might reduce wrinkles and skin roughness similarly to tretinoin. One study used retinol serum starting at a concentration of 0.25% and increased to 1% over 3 months, compared with tretinoin cream 0.025% gradually increased to 0.1% (103671), while another study compared a gradual release tri-retinol 1.1% cream applied daily for 3 months to tretinoin 0.025% cream (104456). Commercial retinol also seems to be beneficial when compared with placebo. A meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies including a total of 352 females over 30 years of age with mild to moderate photodamage shows that applying stabilized retinol 0.1% to the face once or twice daily for 8-12 weeks reduces overall photodamage when compared with placebo. Retinol also reduced uneven skin tone, brown spots, wrinkles and fine lines on the forehead, cheek, and undereye, and crow's feet. Five of the six studies used a split-face design, with each participant serving as their own control. Skin assessments were performed by a single dermatologist in all six studies (114500).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Atopic disease. Supplementation with oral vitamin A does not seem to reduce the risk of atopy. Details: Clinical research in infants born in Guinea-Bissau shows that a single dose of vitamin A does not reduce the incidence of atopy when compared with placebo (90779,90780). Furthermore, giving a single dose of vitamin A to some infants, such as low birth weight infants and infants given Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination, was associated with increased atopy and wheeze (90779).
• Fetal and premature infant mortality. Giving oral vitamin A to malnourished adults during pregnancy and postpartum does not seem to reduce fetal, early infant, or first year mortality. Giving oral or intramuscular vitamin A to the infant also does not seem to reduce mortality in most patients. Details: Most meta-analyses of clinical research in malnourished patients suggest that vitamin A supplementation during pregnancy or postpartum does not reduce fetal, early infant, or first year mortality (6152,34601,34602,34627,82479,82566,82567,90774,90776,90782,90784,95057,109750,109753). Also, giving vitamin A supplements or intramuscular vitamin A to low birth weight infants does not appear to reduce mortality in these patients (82195,82431,82498,90778,90781,95053,107296,107297). Furthermore, vitamin A supplementation in term infants from low or middle income countries also does not appear to reduce the risk of mortality at 6 or 12 months of age when compared with placebo (95054,103674). Some evidence from a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin A supplementation may reduce the risk of mortality at 6 months in Asian infants, although it appears to increase the risk of mortality at 6 months in studies conducted in Africa. It also appears to increase the risk of mortality in female term infants by 12 months (95054).
• Intestinal parasite infection. Oral high-dose vitamin A does not seem to prevent reinfection with intestinal parasites. Details: Clinical research in children living in Malaysia that were given albendazole 400 mg daily for 3-4 days for parasitic worms, shows that adding a single dose of vitamin A 200,000 IU does not help to prevent reinfection when compared with placebo (90772).
• Melanoma. Oral vitamin A in patients with resected melanoma does not seem to improve survival and disease recurrence. Details: A clinical study in patients with completely resected melanoma shows that taking vitamin A 100,000 IU daily for 18 months does not increase disease-free survival when compared with no supplementation (82670).
• Miscarriage. Oral vitamin A given to the mother does not prevent miscarriage or stillbirth. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that maternal supplementation with oral vitamin A, either alone or in combination with other vitamins, prior to or during early pregnancy does not reduce the risk of miscarriage or stillbirth when compared with control (104462).
• Sepsis. Most research shows that oral vitamin A does not reduce the risk of sepsis in premature infants. Details: A meta-analysis of three clinical trials in premature infants shows that providing supplemental enteral vitamin A 1500-5000 IU daily, starting within four days of birth, does not reduce the incidence of sepsis when compared with placebo (109753).
• Tuberculosis. Oral vitamin A does not seem to improve tuberculosis disease duration or mortality. Details: Low levels of vitamin A are common in patients with tuberculosis. However, taking vitamin A 2000 IU to 200,000 IU by mouth for 2-24 months does not improve symptoms, decrease disease duration, or reduce mortality when compared with placebo in these patients (82570,103668,109754). This may be due to the fact that vitamin A levels may normalize following the initiation of tuberculosis treatment, even without additional vitamin A supplementation.

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Head and neck cancer. Oral vitamin A taken for 2 years does not seem to improve survival or prevent head and neck cancer recurrence. Details: A large clinical study n patients with a history of head and neck cancer shows that taking vitamin A as retinyl palmitate 300,000 IU daily for 1 year, and followed by 150,000 IU daily for another year, does not reduce the risk of second primary tumors or tumor recurrence when compared with placebo. Also, vitamin A does not seem to improve survival or event-free survival (1710).
• HIV transmission. Oral vitamin A does not reduce vertical HIV transmission risk. There is some concern that vitamin A might increase HIV transmission through breast milk. Details: Observational and intervention research shows that taking vitamin A orally does not decrease the risk of HIV transmission to the fetus during pregnancy, to newborns during delivery, or to infants during early breast-feeding (6376,82470,95059). Preliminary clinical research also shows that vitamin A supplementation of pregnant adults with HIV infection might increase the risk of HIV transmission to their babies through breast milk (9801).
• Lower respiratory tract infections. Oral vitamin A does not reduce the risk for lower respiratory tract infections in children. It is unclear if supplementation of oral vitamin A while breast-feeding reduces the risk of lower respiratory tract infections in nursing infants. Details: Taking vitamin A by mouth does not prevent or reduce symptoms of lower respiratory tract infections, such as cough and fever, in children (82288,82443). Furthermore, some research shows that vitamin A is associated with a slight increase in the risk of respiratory tract infections when administered to children with adequate nutritional status (82288). Additionally, one small clinical trial in breast-feeding parents shows that supplementation of vitamin A 1800 IU and ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) 600 IU daily for 2 months does not reduce the risk of febrile illness or respiratory tract infections in the nursing infants when compared with placebo (107293).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Although prescription vitamin A analogs are approved to treat acne, it is unclear if non-prescription topical vitamin A products help with acne symptoms. Details: The high-dose vitamin A analogs adapalene (Differin) and tazarotene (Tazorac) are prescription drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of acne (103712,103713). These drugs are not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, such as retinol, which have not been extensively evaluated in clinical research. A small preliminary clinical trial in adolescents and young adults with mild to moderate acne shows that applying topical benzoyl peroxide 2.5% each morning and a topical retinol plus salicylic acid product each evening for 12 weeks modestly improves acne severity and other measures of complexion when compared with baseline. All patients also used the same cleanser twice daily (109748). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Alcohol-related liver disease. Oral vitamin A has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis shows that taking vitamin A in combination with coenzyme Q10 and other vitamins and minerals daily for 6 months does not improve survival when compared with placebo (61392).
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for preventing asthma in children. Details: An observational study in children has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin A is associated with a lower risk of asthma. Children in the highest quartile of vitamin A intake (median of 2267 IU daily) at 7 years of age had improved lung function and 32% lower odds of asthma at 11-14 years of age when compared with children in the lowest quartile of vitamin A intake (median of 870 IU daily) (107291).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if supplementation of oral vitamin A while breast-feeding is beneficial for preventing eczema in nursing infants. Details: One small clinical trial in breast-feeding parents shows that supplementation of vitamin A 1800 IU and ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) 600 IU daily for 2 months does not reduce the risk of eczema in the nursing infants when compared with placebo (107293).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for improving symptoms of autism. Details: Children with autism spectrum disorder are at increased risk for vitamin A deficiency, and vitamin A levels have been inversely associated with autism symptoms. Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of vitamin A 200,000 IU slightly improves emotional response, communication, and other symptoms when compared to baseline (97168). The lack of a control group limits the validity of these findings. Another preliminary clinical study in children with autism and vitamin A deficiency shows that taking vitamin A 50,000 IU weekly for 6 months, but not as a single dose of 200,000 IU, seems to improve social impairment scores when compared with control. Controls were children with autism without vitamin A deficiency that did not take a supplement (104459).
• Breast cancer. Although vitamin A intake has been associated with a reduced risk for breast cancer, it is unclear if vitamin A supplements are beneficial. Details: Epidemiological evidence has found an association between high intake of vitamin A and a reduced risk of breast cancer. A meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that the adults with the highest intake of vitamin A, either from diet alone or also from supplements, reduces the odds of developing breast cancer by 16% when compared with the lowest intake (1444,34610,109752). However, the effects of supplemental vitamin A, specifically, are unclear.
• Cataracts. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for cataract prevention. Details: Observational research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin A is associated with a modestly reduced risk of cataracts (6378,112095). Also, other population research has found that the highest dietary intake of vitamin A is associated with a 17% lower risk of cataracts when compared with the lowest intakes (90786). However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the association between blood levels of vitamin A and the risk of cataracts (90786,90944). It is not known if supplemental vitamin A is beneficial for this purpose.
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for cervical cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that increased vitamin A levels in the blood or higher vitamin A intakes are associated with a reduced risk of cervical cancer. However, this effect is observed when both forms of vitamin A, either retinol or carotenoids, are considered. When only the retinol form is considered, vitamin A supplementation does not seem to reduce the risk of cervical cancer (34613,109752). Also, a meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that vitamin A intake, either from diet alone or supplements, does not affect the risk of cervical cancer (109752).
• Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. It is unclear if oral vitamin A helps to prevent diarrhea caused by chemotherapy. Details: A very small clinical study in children receiving chemotherapy shows that taking vitamin A orally does not seem to prevent GI adverse effects, including diarrhea and mouth pain, when compared with control (9802).
• Child development. Oral vitamin A might improve growth and development in children with vitamin A deficiency, but not in those with good nutritional status. Details: Supplementing with vitamin A 60 mg for up to 9 years does not promote or improve child growth in children with appropriate nutritional status (20132). However, in children with vitamin A deficiency, supplementation with vitamin A may improve growth (82246).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There is limited evidence on the oral use of vitamin A in patients with emphysema. Details: Observational research has found that consuming recommended amounts of vitamin A in the diet is associated with 33% lower odds of developing emphysema (103678).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for cognitive function. Details: A large clinical trial in schoolchildren in Ethiopia, most without vitamin A deficiency, shows that taking vitamin A 200,000 IU at baseline and after 5 months improves working memory, but not other measures of cognitive development, when compared with placebo (113904). However, results are unlikely to be clinically significant.
• Colorectal adenoma. Oral vitamin A has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination supplement containing selenium, zinc, vitamin A, vitamin C, and vitamin E orally daily for 5 years or until the recurrence of an adenoma reduces the risk of recurrent large-bowel adenomas by about 40% when compared with placebo in patients with large-bowel adenomas (92903). It is not clear if this benefit is due to vitamin A or other constituents.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for colorectal cancer prevention. Details: Taking vitamin A alone or in combination with beta-carotene does not seem to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer (12185).
• Corneal abrasion. It is unclear if topical vitamin A is beneficial for preventing corneal abrasion during surgery. Details: A clinical study in patients undergoing general anesthesia for non-ophthalmic surgery shows that applying a specific vitamin A containing gel (Ziyang® Vitamin A Palmitate Eye Gel, Shenyang Xingqi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd) to the ocular surface prior to eye taping decreases evidence of corneal abrasion and increases tear production 30 minutes after surgery when compared with taping without vitamin A gel. However, by 24 hours there was no difference between the two eyes (114501).
• Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. It is unclear if oral vitamin A improves recovery after CABG surgery. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking vitamin A 5000 IU daily (as retinol palmitate) for 21 days starting on the day of CABG surgery reduces time in intensive care after surgery by 46% to 69% compared to a control group not given vitamin A (90783). Supplementation with vitamin A also improves total hospitalization time for those patients with adequate zinc status (90783).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19. Details: Clinical research in COVID-19 outpatients treated with hydroxychloroquine shows that taking vitamin A 25,000 IU daily for 10 days modestly reduces the number of patients with symptoms of fever, body ache, and fatigue when compared with placebo. However, there was no effect on the number of patients with cough, shortness of breath, lack of appetite, chest pain, diarrhea, loss of smell, or headache (109745).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for depression. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that dietary intake of vitamin A is inversely associated with depression. The highest intake of vitamin A was associated with a 17% reduced risk of depression when compared with the lowest intake. Also, vitamin A intake was lower in individuals with depression (109743). The effect of vitamin A supplementation is unclear.
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for esophageal cancer prevention. Details: Observational research has found that higher beta-carotene and vitamin A intake is associated with a reduced risk of esophageal cancer (34551,103675). However, evidence from higher-quality clinical research shows that taking vitamin A in combination with beta-carotene does not reduce the risk of esophageal cancer (12185).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for gastric cancer prevention. Details: Taking vitamin A alone and in combination with beta-carotene does not seem to reduce the risk of gastric cancer (12185).
• Glaucoma. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for glaucoma prevention. Details: Meta-analyses of observational research suggests that a high dietary intake of vitamin A is associated with a 37% reduced risk or 42% lower odds of glaucoma when compared with a low intakes (109742,112095).
• Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). It is unclear if taking vitamin A prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) decreases the incidence of acute or chronic GVHD. Details: A clinical study in patients 1-28 years of age with serum vitamin A levels below the 75th percentile shows that taking a single oral dose of vitamin A 4000 IU/kg (maximum dose: 250,000 IU) approximately 1 week before allogenic HSCT decreases the incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year to 5%, compared with 12.5% in those taking placebo. However, patients who took vitamin A did not have a lower rate of acute GVHD or acute gastrointestinal GVHD at 100 or 180 days when compared with placebo. All patients in this study with low vitamin D levels also received vitamin D supplementation per an institutional protocol (114498).
• HIV/AIDS. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for improving HIV/AIDs outcomes. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical trials and population research shows that maternal vitamin A supplementation of mothers with poor vitamin A status at baseline does not influence child or maternal mortality, hospitalization rate, or HIV/AIDS progression. However, pediatric vitamin A supplementation seems to decrease mortality rates in children with HIV/AIDS when compared with placebo (34529,95059).
• HIV/AIDS-related diarrhea. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for preventing diarrhea associated with HIV. Details: A large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin A can decrease the rate of diarrhea-specific mortality by up to 92% in vitamin A-deficient children with or without HIV/AIDS (1465). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin A does not significantly reduce diarrhea-specific mortality when only children with HIV/AIDS are considered (82511). But vitamin A does appear to reduce overall mortality in these children by 50% to 63% (1465,82511).
• Human papillomavirus (HPV). It is unclear if topical or oral vitamin A is beneficial for the resolution of genital warts caused by HPV. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical trials in patients with genital warts suggests that the oral prescription drugs isotretinoin and etretinate might promote resolution of warts when compared with baseline. However, the topical prescription drug tretinoin 0.05% cream does not seem to help (104460). These drugs are not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, such as retinol.
• Infant development. It is unclear if intramuscular vitamin A improves the development of low birth weight infants. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that giving intramuscular vitamin A to very low birth weight infants reduces the risk of chronic lung disease at 36 weeks postmenstrual age by about 13% compared to control (95053). Preliminary clinical research also shows that giving intramuscular vitamin A along with inhaled nitric oxide gas for 3 weeks to low birth weight infants on mechanical ventilation might improve mental development at one year in some of these patients when compared with inhaled nitric oxide gas alone (90778). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intramuscular vitamin A does not improve neurodevelopment in very low birth weight infants (95053).
• Iron deficiency anemia. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of anemia due to iron deficiency. Details: Some research in children and pregnant adults without anemia shows that taking vitamin A increases plasma levels of hemoglobin and ferritin, and may reduce the risk of developing anemia (9518,34627). However, another study in pregnant patients, half of whom had anemia at baseline and half of whom did not have anemia, shows that taking 3000 mcg retinol orally in combination with iron and folate does not improve hemoglobin or erythropoietin concentrations when compared with taking iron and folate (9188). In preterm infants with existing anemia, taking vitamin A 5000 IU and vitamin B complex 40 mg daily improves serum ferritin, hemoglobin, and reticulocyte levels and reduces the need for blood transfusions when compared with taking either vitamin alone. Taking vitamin A alone, however, does not improve these outcomes (100330).
• Leukemia. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for leukemia prevention. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with chronic myelogenous leukemia shows that taking a specific vitamin A product (Aquasol, Armour Pharmaceuticals) 50,000 IU orally daily in combination with busulfan therapy does not significantly increase progression-free survival or overall survival when compared with busulfan alone. Furthermore, supplementation with vitamin A plus busulfan seems to increase the percentage of patients who experience grade 2 toxicity by about 5-fold when compared with busulfan alone (82652).
• Liver cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for liver cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that vitamin A supplementation or serum levels of vitamin A are not associated with the risk of liver cancer (97169).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for lung cancer treatment or prevention. Details: A large clinical trial in patients with existing lung cancer shows that vitamin A 300,000 IU daily for one year followed by 150,000 IU daily for a second year does not increase survival (1710). However, some clinical research shows that high-dose vitamin A 300,000 IU daily following curative lung cancer resection reduces the risk of new primary tumors in patients heavily exposed to tobacco (7875). Observational research on the relationship between vitamin A and lung cancer risk is conflicting. One large observational study suggests that higher dietary intake of vitamin A is associated with a lower risk of lung cancer. Specifically, each quartile increase in dietary vitamin A intake was associated with a 15%, 25%, and 37% lower relative risk of lung cancer when compared with the lowest intake. However, taking vitamin A in supplement form was not associated with lung cancer risk (112096). Other observational research has found that increased dietary intake of vitamin A is not associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer (35628). Furthermore, supplementation with vitamin A and beta-carotene seems to increase the risk of lung cancer in smokers or those exposed to asbestos (2642,34675).
• Malaria. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for reducing symptoms of malaria in young children. Details: Taking vitamin A orally seems to help decrease symptoms of malaria in children less than 3 years of age living in endemic areas (1464). However, other clinical research shows that single doses of vitamin A 100,000 to 200,000 IU do not improve coma resolution, convulsions, fever, parasite clearance, or mortality in infants and children less than 5 years of age with cerebral malaria (90785).
• Multiple sclerosis-related fatigue. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for reducing fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis receiving interferon beta-1a shows that taking vitamin A 25,000 IU (as retinyl palmitate) (Zahravi Pharmaceutical) daily for 6 months followed by 10,000 IU daily for 6 months, improves physical, cognitive, and psychosocial fatigue when compared with placebo (95052).
• Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). A meta-analysis of several small clinical trials suggests that intramuscular vitamin A does not seem to prevent NEC. Details: A meta-analysis of 3 small clinical studies in very low birth weight infants shows that intramuscular administration of vitamin A 1500-5000 IU every other day or three times weekly for 28 days does not reduce the risk of NEC when compared with a control (107297).
• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for non-Hodgkin lymphoma prevention. Details: Population research has found that intake of vitamin A at levels above 2330 mcg daily is associated with a 17% lower risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma when compared with those whose daily intake of vitamin A is less than 642 mcg per day (90945).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for nonmelanoma skin cancer prevention. Details: Observational research over 26 years found that higher dietary vitamin A intake is associated with a 12% reduced risk for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in healthy patients when compared with lower vitamin A intake (101673).
• Oral clefts. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for oral cleft prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that periconceptional use of vitamin A, from diet and/or supplements, is associated with a 13% reduced incidence of cleft lip alone or with a cleft palate, but is not associated with the risk of cleft palate alone, in the child (109751).
• Osteoarthritis. Oral vitamin A has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with osteoarthritis shows that taking a specific product containing vitamin A in combination with selenium, vitamin C, and vitamin E (Selenium ACE, Carls-Berghs Farmaceutiska AB) does not appear to alleviate symptoms when compared with placebo (74449).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: Most observational research has found that increased dietary intake of vitamin A is associated with a reduced risk of developing ovarian cancer (9193,103679,109752). The most recent meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that adults with the highest intake of vitamin A, either from diet alone or supplements, reduces the odds of developing ovarian cancer by 19% when compared with the lowest intake (109752).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for pancreatic cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that higher intake of vitamin A is associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer; however, this benefit appears to be limited to only hospital-based cases and studies conducted in Europe (95060). In contrast, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin A in combination with beta-carotene does not reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer (12185).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin A prevents Parkinson disease development. Details: Population research has found that blood levels or dietary intake of vitamin A are not associated with the risk of Parkinson disease (91164).
• Photoreactive keratectomy. Oral vitamin A has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking a specific product (Evitex capsules, Alcon) containing vitamin A along with vitamin E seems to improve healing after photoreactive keratectomy. High dose (50,000 to 75,000 IU) vitamin A in the form of retinol palmitate taken daily with vitamin E (alpha-tocopheryl nicotinate) 460-590 mg daily seems to accelerate re-epithelialization, reduce haze formation, and improve visual acuity in patients undergoing laser surgery for myopia (348).
• Pneumonia. Oral vitamin A does not seem to prevent mortality related to pneumonia in children. However, it is unclear if vitamin A reduces symptom severity and hospitalization in children. Details: Clinical research in children living in developing countries shows that taking vitamin A orally does not prevent mortality related to pneumonia (1466,82362,82504,82717,109749). However, the evidence related to symptom duration and severity is mixed. A large study and early meta-analyses show that vitamin A does not prevent pneumonia or decrease the severity or length of hospitalization in children with pneumonia (1466,82362,82504,82717). A more recent meta-analysis also shows that giving vitamin A to children at or below 5 years of age does not affect the duration of hospitalization (109755). The best evidence to date comes from a recent meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. This meta-analysis shows that, when given in combination with conventional therapy to children up to 10 years of age, vitamin A reduces the duration of symptoms including fever, cough, lung rale, and shortness of breath, as well as the duration of hospitalization and time to a negative X-ray, when compared with conventional therapy alone (109749). However, the number of trials evaluating each endpoint is small and more research is needed to confirm these findings.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if vitamin A reduces the duration of hospitalization for premature infants. Details: A meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials in preterm infants shows that providing supplemental enteral vitamin A 1500-5000 IU daily, starting within four days of birth, does not reduce the duration of hospitalization when compared with placebo (109750).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Observational studies suggest that dietary intake of vitamin A is not associated with a reduced risk of prostate cancer (14134).
• Psoriasis. It is unclear if topical vitamin A is beneficial for psoriasis symptoms. Details: The vitamin A analog tazarotene (Tazorac) is a prescription drug that is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to treat stable plaque psoriasis covering up to 20% body surface area (103713). This drug is not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, such as retinol.
• Radiation proctopathy. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for reducing chronic radiation proctopathy symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients experiencing chronic radiation proctopathy caused by pelvic radiotherapy shows that taking retinol palmitate 10,000 IU daily for 90 days might reduce rectal symptoms when compared with placebo (82350).
• Retinopathy of prematurity. Most small studies show that oral or intramuscular vitamin A does not reduce the risk of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Details: A meta-analysis of 4 small clinical studies in very low birth weight infants shows that intramuscular administration of vitamin A 2000-10,000 IU every other day or three times weekly, or oral vitamin A 2000 IU daily, for 28 days does not reduce the risk of ROP when compared with a control (107297). Another meta-analysis of clinical research shows that providing supplemental enteral vitamin A 1500 IU or an average of 5000 IU daily, starting within four days of birth, does not reduce the incidence of severe ROP (109750,109753). However, a very small clinical study in preterm infants, which was not included in the meta-analysis, shows that receiving retinol palmitate drops 3000 IU/kg daily for 28 days reduces the risk of ROP by 88% when compared with no treatment (103672).
• Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). It is unclear if vitamin A is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of URTIs in young children. Details: A meta-analysis of 3 low-quality clinical studies in children under 7 years of age living in low- to middle-income countries found that there is no association between vitamin A supplementation and rate of acute URTI, although this finding was considered to be of low certainty. There was insufficient data to determine whether vitamin A may reduce the severity of URTI symptoms (114499). The interpretation of findings is limited by high heterogeneity of the study populations and dosing regimens, as well as variability in selected outcomes.
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). It is unclear if adding oral vitamin A to antibiotic therapy is beneficial for symptoms of acute pyelonephritis in young females. Details: A small clinical study in females 2-12 years of age with a first occurrence of acute pyelonephritis shows that taking vitamin A 1500 units/kg daily for 10 days in conjunction with antibiotics decreases the duration of fever by about 1.3 days and reduces urinary frequency by about 1.5 episodes per day when compared to taking placebo with antibiotics. Taking vitamin A might also reduce the occurrence of moderate or severe renal scarring after 6 months when compared with placebo (100327). The validity of these findings is limited by small study size and a high dropout rate.
• Warts. It is unclear if topical or oral vitamin A improves the resolution of viral warts. Details: A meta-analysis of observational and clinical research in patients with viral warts suggests that receiving prescription oral retinoids (isotretinoin, acitretin, etretinate) seems to produce a 61% rate of wart resolution. Prescription topical retinoids seems to produce a 64% rate of wart resolution (104461). These drugs are not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, such as retinol. More evidence is needed to rate vitamin A for these uses.

(Read more about VITAMIN A)

EFFECTIVE

• Imerslund-Grasbeck disease. Intramuscular vitamin B12 is effective for patients with this condition. Details: Administering intramuscular vitamin B12 (hydroxocobalamin) 1 mg daily for 10 days, followed by monthly injections for the remainder of a patient's life, is effective for treating familial selective vitamin B12 malabsorption (Imerslund-Grasbeck disease) (15,82862).
• Vitamin B12 deficiency. Administering vitamin B12 orally, intramuscularly, or intranasally is effective for preventing and treating vitamin B12 deficiency. Details: Vitamin B12 deficiency has varying definitions but is often defined as vitamin B12 (cobalamin) levels less than 180-200 pmol/L (or 240 pg/mL). Some believe that only intramuscular vitamin B12 is effective for treating vitamin B12 deficiency. However, clinical research shows that oral therapy increases cobalamin levels similarly to intramuscular administration, even in patients with pernicious anemia or malabsorption, if a high enough dose is given (2909,2911,2915,9335,82832) (82836,82949,82860,103976,103972,107141,107144). Some evidence suggests that the most effective oral dose is between 647-1032 mcg daily (13106). However, in certain situations, intramuscular treatment might be more appropriate. Guidelines by the British Committee for Standards in Hematology recommend only intramuscular vitamin B12 for initial treatment of severe vitamin B12 deficiency in patients with pernicious anemia, malabsorption disorders, or neurological involvement (94722). Intramuscular vitamin B12 is also appropriate in patients with diarrhea or vomiting and those likely to be nonadherent (103972). Vitamin B12 deficiency is especially common in older adults, primarily due to lack of intrinsic factor and malabsorption (2915,2919,9335). Daily supplementation with vitamin B12 50-100 mcg might be needed to correct deficiency (10126), while daily doses of 25-37.5 mcg help to maintain normal levels over time (9335). In addition to supplements, foods such as milk and bread fortified with vitamin B12 can be used and are approximately 55% to 60% absorbed by people over 60 years of age (10124). Vitamin B12 deficiency is also common in patients that have had gastric surgery, including gastrectomy and bariatric surgery (107144,107145). Taking vitamin B12 in the doses found in multivitamins or generic vitamin B supplements does not seem to prevent vitamin B12 deficiency following bariatric surgery (107145). However, taking methylcobalamin 500 mcg daily is beneficial for treating vitamin B12 deficiency associated with a total gastrectomy and taking cyanocobalamin 5000 mcg daily is beneficial for preventing vitamin B12 deficiency following gastric bypass (107144). Other people at risk for vitamin B12 deficiency include strict vegetarians who eat no animal products (vegans) and people with increased vitamin B12 requirements associated with pregnancy, thyrotoxicosis, hemolytic anemia, hemorrhage, malignancy, and hepatic and kidney disease. Moderate consumption of animal products may not be sufficient to restore and maintain vitamin B12 levels, especially in adolescents who had consumed macrobiotic (vegan type) diets for the first 6 years of life. High dietary intake of vitamin B12 or supplements is usually needed in order to restore and maintain optimal vitamin B12 levels in these adolescents (10125).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Cyanide poisoning. Intravenous hydroxocobalamin (Cyanokit) is likely effective as an antidote for patients with suspected or known cyanide toxicity due to inhalation, ingestion, or skin exposure. Details: Treatment of cyanide poisoning with hydroxocobalamin (Cyanokit) up to 10 grams has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and recommended by the Australian Resuscitation Council (82870,82905,82906). Hydroxocobalamin is also FDA-approved for treating cyanide toxicity during pregnancy (82904).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Canker sores. Sublingual or topical vitamin B12 seems to reduce canker sore symptoms. Details: Clinical research in patients with canker sores shows that applying a topical ointment containing vitamin B12 500 mcg in four divided doses daily for 2 days reduces pain levels by 80% when compared with a control ointment not containing vitamin B12 (96176). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking vitamin B12 1000 mcg sublingually daily for 6 months reduces the duration of canker sore outbreaks, the number of ulcers, and level of pain when compared with placebo in patients with normal vitamin B12 levels (17242).
• Hyperhomocysteinemia. Oral vitamin B12 in combination with folic acid, and sometimes with vitamin B6, reduces homocysteine levels. Details: While folic acid 0.5-5 mg daily lowers fasting homocysteine levels by an average of 25%, adding vitamin B12 0.5 mg daily produces an additional decrease of about 7% on average (6883,9400,9401,9405,9409,50145,107136). Vitamin B12 in combination with folic acid and other vitamins also reduces homocysteine levels in patients with kidney failure, sickle cell disease, and those receiving nitrous oxide general anesthesia (1489,6883,6884,7289,7881,9324,9414,9415,9416,9481,82941). Some researchers recommend routine use of vitamin B12 with homocysteine-lowering regimens to avoid the risk of neuropathy in people with undetected vitamin B12 deficiency (9405). Using vitamin B12 alone has a limited effect on homocysteine levels, and probably only in those people with vitamin B12 deficiency (2147,9410,9512). Hyperhomocysteinemia is considered by some to be an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis, recurrent thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke (1899,2147,3323,9402,9405,9408,9409). Clinical research suggests that supplementation with folic acid, pyridoxine, and vitamin B12 decreases homocysteine levels and reduces the atherosclerosis progression in patients at risk for atherosclerosis when compared with placebo (50133,50056,82806). However, other research suggests that elevated homocysteine levels may be a marker, as opposed to a cause, of vascular disease (11387,11388). A 5 µmol/L increase in plasma homocysteine increases the risk of cerebrovascular disease by 50%, and the odds of coronary heart disease by 60% and 80% in males and females, respectively (9407,9411). However, it is not clear if reducing homocysteine levels results in reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (1489,6883,6884,9400,9405,9409,96417). Folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 supplementation can reduce total homocysteine from 13.4 to 11 µmol/L. However, this reduction does not seem improve endothelial function or help with secondary prevention of death or myocardial infarction, and some research even suggests an increase in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk (11387,13482,50373,50314,97619). There is also some debate about whether supplementation with homocysteine-lowering B vitamins can reduce the risk of stroke. A number of large clinical studies and meta-analyses show that supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12, alone or in combination, does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with CVD or impaired kidney function (11387,13482,50423,83050,96150). However, a more recent meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials including over 44,000 patients shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo in patients at risk or with a history of CVD (97619). Also, a meta-analysis in adults with a history of stroke shows that B vitamin supplementation modestly reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% and vascular death by 11% when compared with placebo (107136).
• Postherpetic neuralgia. Subcutaneous injections of vitamin B12 seem to reduce postherpetic neuralgia symptoms. Details: Clinical research in patients with subacute herpetic neuralgia shows that subcutaneous injection of vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin) 1000 mcg six times weekly for 4 weeks reduces pain when compared with oral vitamin B12 or subcutaneous lidocaine (90394). Another clinical study shows that administering local subcutaneous injections of methylcobalamin 1000 mcg plus lidocaine up to 20 mg daily for 12 injections over 14 days, starting within 7 days of the onset of subacute ophthalmic herpetic neuralgia, decreases the mean pain score by 63% to 79% when compared with intravenous lidocaine and intramuscular methylcobalamin. Less than 2 patients need to be treated to achieve a pain reduction to ≤3 out of 10. Healing of rash, itching, numbness, and tingling were also improved (96175). Additional clinical research in patients with postherpetic pain and itching shows that this same dosing regimen of subcutaneous vitamin B12 reduces pain and analgesic requirements when compared to baseline (90396).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Age-related cognitive decline. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to improve cognitive function in older adults when used alone or in combination with other B vitamins. Details: Taking vitamin B12 100-1000 mcg plus folic acid 400-2000 mcg, with or without vitamin B6 3-50 mg, daily for up to about 2 years does not seem to improve tests of cognitive function in adults aged 65 or older, most of whom do not report cognitive impairment at baseline (14392,50225,50510,90392,107140). Also, supplementation with vitamin B12 does not seem to improve cognitive function in elderly individuals with low vitamin B12 levels (12305).
• Alzheimer disease. Oral vitamin B12, when used in combination with other B vitamins, does not seem to improve cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer disease. Details: Clinical research in patients with probable Alzheimer disease using routine medication shows that taking vitamin B12 1 mg, folic acid 5 mg, and vitamin B6 25 mg daily for 18 months does not have a beneficial effect on cognitive function or the severity of disease when compared with placebo. In this study, all patients were consuming a folate-fortified diet (50319). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research in elderly adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia shows that taking vitamin B12, usually with other B vitamins, does not improve cognitive function (50510). Observational research has also found that higher vitamin B12 intake over 3 years in a population consuming a folate-fortified diet is not associated with a decreased risk of developing Alzheimer disease (15270). In contrast, preliminary clinical research in patients with probable Alzheimer disease who are not consuming a folate-fortified diet shows that taking vitamin B12 50 mcg daily plus folic acid 1.2 mg daily for 6 months modestly improves some measures of cognitive performance and decreases levels of homocysteine when compared with placebo (107150). More research is needed to determine if any changes in this latter study are clinically relevant.
• Cataracts. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to reduce cataract development. Details: Clinical research in women with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or at increased risk of CVD shows that taking a combination of folic acid 2.5 mg daily, vitamin B6 50 mg daily, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for an average of 7.3 years does not reduce the risk of cataracts and seems to increase the risk of cataract extraction by 28% when compared with placebo (96149).
• Circadian rhythm sleep disorders. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to improve sleep disorders. Details: Oral vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin) does not seem to be effective for treating delayed sleep phase syndrome. Methylcobalamin 0.5-1 mg three times daily, with or without bright light therapy, also does not seem to help people with primary circadian rhythm sleep disorders (1344,1345,1346,1347,1348).
• Cognitive impairment. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to be beneficial for older adults with cognitive impairment. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in elderly adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia shows that taking vitamin B12, usually with other B vitamins, does not improve cognitive function (50510). One clinical trial in elderly people with memory complaints shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 0.8 mg, vitamin B12 0.5 mg, and vitamin B6 (form not specified) 20 mg daily for 24 months reduces cerebral atrophy in the gray matter regions associated with Alzheimer disease by up to seven-fold when compared with placebo. However, this protection does not occur in patients with the lowest average blood levels of homocysteine (90374).
• Fall prevention. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to reduce the risk of falls. Details: Clinical research shows that taking B vitamins, including folic acid 400 mcg and vitamin B12 500 mcg, daily for 2 years does not prevent falls when compared with placebo in elderly individuals also taking vitamin D (96148).
• Osteoporosis. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Details: Clinical research in elderly patients or patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease shows that taking vitamin B12 500 mcg and folic acid 0.4-2 mg, with or without vitamin B6 25 mg, daily for 2-3 years does not seem to reduce the risk for osteoporotic fractures when compared with placebo (90377,90393). A 5-7 year follow-up of this research has also found no benefit (103981).
• Physical performance. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to improve physical performance in older adults. Details: Clinical research shows that taking B vitamins, including folic acid 400 mcg and vitamin B12 500 mcg, daily for 2 years does not increase hand strength or improve performance such as walking when compared with placebo in elderly individuals also taking vitamin D (96148).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large-scale clinical study shows that taking vitamin B12 1000 mcg, folic acid 2.5 mg, and vitamin B6 50 mg daily, reduces the risk of developing AMD in females over 40 years of age with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or at least three risk factors for CVD. Those who took this combination for an average of 7.3 years had a 34% reduced risk of developing AMD and a 41% reduced risk of visually significant AMD when compared with placebo (14620). It is unclear if this effect is due to vitamin B12, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). It is unclear if high-dose intramuscular vitamin B12 improves the prognosis of ALS. Details: A clinical study in patients with ALS symptoms for 3 years or less shows that intramuscular vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin) 25-50 mg twice weekly for 3.5 years does not slow functional decline or increase the time until ventilation or death when compared with placebo. However, other clinical research in patients with early-stage ALS shows that intramuscular methylcobalamin 50 mg twice weekly for 16 weeks is associated with slower functional decline and a longer period of time until death or full ventilation when compared with placebo (104947,111556). These effects seem to be particularly notable in fine and gross motor skills, but not bulbar or respiratory functions. Furthermore, vitamin B12 and riluzole slowed clinical progression of ALS more than riluzole alone (111556).
• Angioplasty. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Some evidence suggests that vitamin B12 400 mcg, folic acid 1 mg, and vitamin B6 10 mg daily can decrease the rate of restenosis in patients treated with balloon angioplasty (8009,9412,34540). However, this combination does not seem to be as effective for reducing restenosis in patients after coronary stenting (8009). An intravenous loading dose of folic acid, pyridoxine, and vitamin B12 followed by oral administration of folic acid 1.2 mg, pyridoxine 48 mg, and vitamin B12 60 mcg daily after bare metal coronary stenting also does not seem to reduce restenosis and might actually increase restenosis (12150,12151,34540). Due to the lack of evidence of benefit and potential for harm, this combination of vitamins should not be recommended for patients receiving coronary stents (12151). It is unclear if any effects are due to vitamin B12, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Anxiety. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B12 for anxiety and panic attacks, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B12 for these uses.
• Asthma. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B12 for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B12 for this condition.
• Atherosclerosis. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study in patients with intermediate risk for coronary heart disease shows that taking vitamin B12 100 mcg, aged garlic extract 250 mg, folic acid 300 mcg, vitamin B6 12.5 mg, and L-arginine 100 mg daily for 12 months reduces coronary artery calcium progression when compared with placebo (88385). It is unclear if this effect is due to vitamin B12, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if topical vitamin B12 reduces the severity of eczema. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a specific topical vitamin B12 0.07% cream (Regividerm) twice daily reduces the extent and severity of atopic dermatitis when compared with placebo (15765).
• Attention. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B12 for improving attention and focus, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B12 for this use.
• Cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 reduces overall cancer risk when used in combination with other B vitamins. Details: An ancillary clinical study in middle-aged and elderly adults with cardiovascular disease shows that taking a combination of vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) 0.02 mg, folic acid 0.56 mg, and vitamin B6 3 mg, with or without eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 400 mg plus docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 200 mg, for a median of 4.7 years does not reduce the risk of cancer when compared with placebo (90666). An additional secondary analysis of clinical research in patients recovering from stroke or transient ischemic attack shows that taking vitamin B12 500 mcg, folic acid 2 mg, and vitamin B6 25 mg daily for around 3.4 years does not reduce the risk of cancer when compared with placebo (90378). The validity of these findings is limited because the studies were not designed nor adequately powered to test for cancer risk.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral vitamin B12, taken along with other B vitamins, does not seem to improve secondary prevention of death or myocardial infarction in patients with CVD. However, it might slightly reduce the risk of stroke. Details: Overall evidence from clinical research and meta-analyses shows that taking vitamin B12 in combination with folic acid and/or vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk for secondary death or myocardial infarction in patients with or at risk for CVD (11387,13482,34540,50423,83050,90379,97619). In fact, some research suggests that long-term supplementation with vitamin B6, folic acid, and vitamin B12 for secondary prevention increases the risk of CVD by 20% despite lowering homocysteine levels by 30% (13482). However, other research shows that taking vitamin B12 in combination with other B vitamins modestly reduces the risk of stroke, although results are conflicting (11387,13482,50423,83050,96150,96165,97619,107136). It is unclear which specific combination of B vitamins, if any, might be optimal for reducing stroke risk and which patients are most likely to benefit. In 2001, prior to the publication of the highest quality research on this topic, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368).
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 reduces cervical cancer risk. Details: Some epidemiological evidence has found that increasing vitamin B12 intake from dietary and supplement sources, along with folic acid, thiamine, and riboflavin, might decrease the risk of precancerous cervical lesions (11074). Also, an analysis of two case control studies has found that increased intake of vitamin B12 is associated with a 75% reduced odds of cervical cancer (34609).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients receiving chemotherapy shows that a combination of B vitamins that includes vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) 1000 mcg, taken daily starting one week prior to treatment and finishing 12 weeks after treatment is completed, does not prevent peripheral neuropathy when compared with placebo (96173).
• Child development. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for child development. Details: Population research has found that daily dietary intake of less than 2.26 mcg vitamin B12 in the third trimester of pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of poorer outcomes in the offspring for some measures of speech and mathematics ability, including vocabulary at 24 months, combining words at 38 months, speech intelligibility at 6 years, and math comprehension between ages 8-11 years, when compared with dietary intakes of at least 2.26 mcg daily. There was no association between prenatal vitamin B12 intake and reading or spelling abilities, vocabulary at other ages, or full-scale Intelligence Quotient (IQ) at ages 8 or 15 (107143). Furthermore, a very large clinical study in infants of pregnant adults, 71% of whom were deficient in vitamin B12 at baseline, shows that taking vitamin B12 50 mcg daily starting in early pregnancy (<15 weeks gestation) until 6 months postpartum does not improve neurodevelopment as measured by language, motor, socioemotional, or cognitive scores at 12 months old and may worsen early motor performance at 8-12 weeks when compared with placebo. However, the negative effects on motor performance resolved by 6 and 12 months of age (112431).
• Child growth. Oral vitamin B12 taken by pregnant adults does not seem to be beneficial for infant growth. Details: A very large clinical study in infants of pregnant adults, 71% of whom were deficient in vitamin B12 at baseline, shows that taking vitamin B12 50 mcg daily starting in early pregnancy (<15 weeks gestation) until 6 months postpartum does not improve the infant's linear growth, length, or weight at 12 months of age (112431).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 reduces the risk of COPD. Details: Clinical research in patients with COPD shows that taking vitamin B12 500 mg daily for 8 weeks modestly improves endurance on the cycle ergometer, but does not improve oxygen consumption, when compared with placebo (96172).
• Cognitive function. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in healthy, middle-aged adults shows that taking a combination product containing vitamin B12, other B vitamins, bacopa, and gingko biloba twice daily for 12 weeks does not improve measures of memory, attention, cognition, mood, or stress reactivity when compared with placebo (111334).
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 reduces colorectal cancer risk. Details: Some epidemiological evidence has found that increased dietary intake of vitamin B12 is associated with a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (90383). However, preliminary clinical research shows that taking vitamin B12 1 mg, folic acid 2.5 mg, and vitamin B6 50 mg daily for up to 7.3 years does not reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma in females at high risk for cardiovascular disease (90389). Furthermore, a secondary analysis of clinical research in elderly patients suggests that taking vitamin B12 500 mcg and folic acid 400 mcg daily for 2 years might increase the risk of colorectal cancer when compared with placebo (90393).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for patients with COVID-19. Details: A small observational study in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia has found that higher plasma vitamin B12 levels may be associated with an increased risk of transfer to intensive care or death than lower plasma levels. However, when multivariate regression was conducted, only patient age was associated with worsened outcomes. Additionally, the total study population was small, with only nine of 49 patients experiencing the worsened outcomes (107138).
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 reduces the risk of developing dementia. Details: A large cohort of Danish adults has found that vitamin B12 levels or intake does not seem to impact the risk of developing Alzheimer disease or other dementias (104922). However, vitamin B12 might be beneficial in specific patient populations. A small observational study in patients with Parkinson disease has found that higher vitamin B12 levels (648.5 ng/L) are associated with a lower risk of developing dementia when compared with lower vitamin B12 levels (452 ng/L) (103975). It is not yet known if supplementation with vitamin B12 reduces the risk for dementia in these patients.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for reducing depression risk. Details: A meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that the highest dietary intake of vitamin B12 is associated with a 14% reduced risk of depression. However, in a sub-analysis, this association was not significant in males (107133). In contrast, one epidemiological study in older males included in the analysis has found that daily dietary intake of at least 4.79 mcg vitamin B12 is linked with a 58% lower risk of depression when compared with daily intake of less than 3.16 mcg. In this study, this inverse association was not observed in females (96168). Other observational research has found that low-normal serum vitamin B12 levels are associated with a 3.8 times increased risk for depression during pregnancy when compared with normal vitamin B12 levels (102384). It is unclear if increased intake of vitamin B12 through the diet or supplements reduces the risk for depression or is beneficial for treating symptoms of depression in any population. However, a meta-analysis of clinical research in elderly populations shows that supplementation with vitamin B12 100-1000 mcg daily, usually in combination with folic acid 400-2000 mcg daily, does not reduce symptoms of depression. Most individuals in these studies were not specifically diagnosed with depression (107140).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 improves glycemic indices or prevents loss of skeletal muscle in patients with diabetes. Details: A small clinical study in patients with diabetes in India who are stabilized on metformin and/or a sulfonylurea shows that taking vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin) 500 mcg with or without folic acid 5 mg daily for 8 weeks seems to reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) by 1.3% to 1.5%, compared with a 0.3% increase with placebo (104917). This study is limited due its small sample size and lack of blinding. In elderly adults with type 2 diabetes, population research has found a lower dietary intake of vitamin B12 (average of 11.2 mcg daily) in individuals with a loss of skeletal muscle mass of at least 1.2%, compared with an average intake of 13.4 mcg daily in those with a skeletal muscle mass loss of less than 1.2%. However, further analysis determined that any relationship between vitamin B12 intake and loss of skeletal muscle mass was only significant in individuals with insufficient energy intake overall (107151).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Small clinical studies suggest that oral vitamin B12 may modestly improve pain in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy show that taking vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin) 1-1.5 mg for 4-12 months modestly improves pain when compared with baseline or placebo (82841,104923). Some research also shows that vitamin B12 may be beneficial in combination with other ingredients. Studies have evaluated products containing vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin or cyanocobalamin), benfotiamine, and vitamin B6 daily for 9-12 weeks (82931,82939); and vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin) 2 mg, folic acid (L-methylfolate) 3 mg, and vitamin B6 (pyridoxal-5'-phosphate) 35 mg (Metanx; Pamlab) daily for 24 weeks (90375).
• Diarrhea. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for reducing diarrhea in children. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children aged 6-30 months from low- and middle-income countries shows that taking vitamin B12 at twice the recommended dietary allowance, with or without folic acid, does not reduce the risk for diarrhea when compared with placebo (90391).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if intramuscular vitamin B12 is beneficial for improving well-being in those with fatigue or tiredness. Details: A small crossover trial in patients complaining of tiredness or fatigue shows that receiving intramuscular injections of vitamin B12 (hydroxocobalamin) 5 mg twice weekly for 2 weeks seems to improve general well-being and happiness, and has a trend toward improving fatigue, when compared with placebo (10127). The validity of this study is limited by a large drop-out rate and unstandardized outcome measures.
• Hearing loss. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with adenosine triphosphate; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small observational study in adults with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss has found that taking vitamin B12 1.5 mg with adenosine triphosphate 300 mg daily for 8-16 weeks is associated with modestly reduced hearing loss at 4-6 months after starting treatment when compared with taking the combination for less than 8 weeks (104924). This finding is limited due to its observational nature and lack of a control group.
• Hepatitis C. It is unclear if intramuscular vitamin B12 is beneficial for sustaining viral response in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection shows that intramuscular vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) 5000 mcg every 4 weeks along with standard care improves sustained viral response when compared with standard of care alone (90386).
• Hypertriglyceridemia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for reducing triglyceride levels. Details: Some evidence shows that taking vitamin B12 7.5 mcg with fish oil 5 grams might be superior to fish oil alone when used daily to reduce total serum cholesterol and triglycerides. This suggests vitamin B12 might have an independent effect in lowering serum cholesterol and triglycerides, but further investigation is needed to confirm this effect (8694).
• Hypotension. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for treating hypotension. Details: A meta-analysis of 3 observational studies in patients hospitalized with hypotension secondary to cardiac surgery vasoplegia suggests that administration of intravenous vitamin B12 (hydroxocobalamin) is associated with an 8 mmHg higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 1 hour but no change in vasopressor dosage at 1 hour or mortality rate when compared with methylene blue (112264). The validity of these findings is limited by the inclusion of only retrospective studies.
• Infant development. It is unclear if taking oral vitamin B12 during pregnancy is beneficial for improving infant development. Giving oral vitamin B12 to infants does not seem to be beneficial. Details: Clinical research shows that supplementation with vitamin B12 50 mcg daily from less than 14 weeks gestation until 6 weeks postpartum does not improve cognitive development in infants by 9 months of age when compared with placebo (96174). When these children were evaluated at 30 months of age, a very small benefit of vitamin B12 on expressive language was identified; however, there was no effect on cognition, receptive language, fine motor skills, or gross motor skills (100169). It is unknown whether a longer duration of postpartum supplementation or supplementation in specific populations might be beneficial. Vitamin B12 supplementation in infants has also been evaluated. A large clinical trial in marginally stunted Nepalese infants aged 6-11 months shows that giving vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) 2 mcg daily for 12 months reduces homocysteine levels, but does not improve motor or cognitive development, when compared with placebo (104926).
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B12 for IBD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B12 for this condition.
• Lung cancer. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: The association between vitamin B12 and lung cancer is unclear. Some population research found no relationship between blood levels of vitamin B12 and lung cancer (9454). However, other observational research involving over 5,000 case-control pairs found that higher vitamin B12 levels are linked with an increased risk for lung cancer (102383). It is unclear if increased intake of vitamin B12, either through the diet or supplementation, directly affects the risk of lung cancer.
• Male infertility. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A retrospective study in adult males with idiopathic and varicocele-related infertility suggests that taking a combination product containing vitamin B12 1.5 mcg, L-carnitine, acetyl L-carnitine, citric acid, selenium, coenzyme Q10, vitamin C, zinc, and folic acid (Proxeed Plus) twice daily for 6 months is associated with improvements in ejaculate volume, sperm count, sperm concentration, total motility, and progressive motility in patients with idiopathic infertility when compared to baseline. However, improvement in sperm morphology was lacking. Furthermore, patients with more severe varicocele seem to benefit most, especially with regard to progressive motility (111296). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of comparator group. Further, it is unclear if these effects are due to vitamin B12, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Mastalgia. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with mastalgia shows that taking a combination of vitamin B12 as methylcobalamin 100 mg, gamma-linolenic acid, and vitamin C daily for 12 weeks does not improve the proportion of patients with minimal or no pain when compared with placebo (111059).
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B12 for MS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B12 for this condition.
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: A small clinical study in adults with NAFLD shows that taking vitamin B12 1000 mcg daily for 12 weeks reduces serum levels of homocysteine but has no effect on serum aminotransferases, measures of steatosis, fibrosis scores, fasting blood glucose, serum insulin, measures of insulin resistance, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol when compared with placebo (111555).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for reducing the risk of pancreatic cancer. Details: Most population research has found that increased intake of vitamin B12, as a supplement or in the diet, is not associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer (9327,104927). However, a small, retrospective population study in which smoking and non-smoking adults recalled past eating habits found that increased dietary intake of vitamin B12 is associated with a 33% reduction in pancreatic cancer risk (97976). These conflicting findings may be related to study methodology, as well as the age, gender, or smoking status of the included patients.
• Periodontitis. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B12 for periodontitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B12 for this condition.
• Peripheral neuropathy. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific product containing vitamin B12 3 mcg, folic acid 400 mcg, and uridine monophosphate 50 mg (Keltican) daily for 60 days reduces pain by 44% and decreases analgesic use by over 75% when compared to baseline in patients with peripheral neuropathy, including those with lumbar/lumbosacral radiculopathy, sciatic pain, and cervical radiculopathy (90384). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group. Furthermore, it is unclear if the benefits are due to vitamin B12, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Psoriasis. Topical vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that a specific cream containing vitamin B12 and avocado oil (Regividerm, Regeneratio Pharma AG) reduces symptoms of psoriasis as effectively as calcipotriol ointment (Psorcutan) after 12 weeks of therapy. The vitamin B12 combination cream also causes less irritation than calcipotriol (14909). It is unclear if the benefits are due to vitamin B12, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Respiratory tract infections. A small study suggests that oral vitamin B12 does not reduce the rate of respiratory tract infections in children. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children aged 6-30 months from low-and middle-income countries suggests that taking vitamin B12 at twice the recommended dietary allowance with or without folic acid does not reduce the risk for lower respiratory tract infections when compared with placebo (90391).
• Schizophrenia. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of vitamin B12 400 mcg and folic acid 2 mg daily for 16 weeks improves negative symptoms when compared with placebo in patients with schizophrenia who have persistent symptoms and a specific genetic variant of the folate transporter gene FOLHI. This variant normally results in reduced folate absorption. However, in patients without this genetic variant, folate is not beneficial with respect to negative symptom improvement (90387).
• Sickle cell disease. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other B vitamins; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with sickle cell disease shows that taking vitamin B12 4.2-6 mcg, folic acid 700 mcg, and vitamin B6 4.2-6 mg daily might lower homocysteine levels. However, it is unknown if this will reduce the risk of endothelial damage in these patients (9324).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12, either alone or with other B vitamins, is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Epidemiological research has found that people with a higher intake of vitamin B12 from dietary sources do not have a reduced risk of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (14316). A number of clinical studies and meta-analyses show that supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12, alone or in combination, does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or impaired kidney function (11387,13482,50420,50423,83050,90379,90380,96150). However, a more recent meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials including over 44,000 patients shows that B vitamin supplementation modestly reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo in patients at risk or with a history of CVD (97619). This meta-analysis differed from some of the earlier analyses due to the inclusion of several additional clinical trials. Also, a meta-analysis in adults with a history of stroke shows that B vitamin supplementation modestly reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% and vascular death by 11% when compared with placebo (107136). In 2001, prior to the publication of the highest quality research on this topic, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368). Unfortunately, even after the publication of higher quality research, it is still unclear which specific combination of B vitamins is optimal and which patients are most likely to benefit. One network meta-analysis suggests that a combination of folic acid and vitamin B6 lowers the risk of stroke more effectively than B vitamin mixtures that include vitamin B12 (96165). However, this analysis is limited because it didn't account for dosing. Another meta-analysis suggests that exposure to low, but not high, amounts of vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) seems to reduce stroke risk (96150).
• Tinnitus. It is unclear if intramuscular vitamin B12 is beneficial in patients with tinnitus. Details: A small clinical study shows that intramuscular vitamin B12 2500 mcg weekly for 6 weeks reduces tinnitus severity by 22% when compared to baseline in patients with chronic tinnitus and vitamin B12 deficiency, but not in patients with normal levels of vitamin B12. Vitamin B12 does not improve pitch or volume in either group of patients (96170). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Venous thromboembolism (VTE). It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for preventing VTE. Details: Epidemiological research has found that low levels of vitamin B12 are associated with an increased risk for VTE. However, clinical trials evaluating the use of B vitamins for prevention of VTE have shown conflicting results (90398). More evidence is needed to rate vitamin B12 for these uses.

(Read more about VITAMIN B12)

EFFECTIVE

• Pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy. Intravenous vitamin B6 is effective for controlling pyridoxine-dependent seizures. Details: Pyridoxine-dependent seizures are a rare type of refractory seizures in neonates that do not respond to anticonvulsant drugs. These seizures are typically controlled within minutes of intravenous administration of pyridoxine, a form of vitamin B6. Pyridoxine-dependent seizures can be due to genetic (autosomal recessive) pyridoxine dependency, or more commonly, a result of the use of high-dose pyridoxine during pregnancy (8197,8198).
• Sideroblastic anemia. Oral vitamin B6 is effective for treating hereditary sideroblastic anemia. Details: Taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) orally is effective for treating hereditary sideroblastic anemia (15,9518). Taking the active form of vitamin B6 (pyridoxal-5'-phosphate) also seems to be effective in cases in which the patient does not respond to pyridoxine (93049).
• Vitamin B6 deficiency. Oral vitamin B6 is effective for preventing and treating vitamin B6 deficiency. Details: Taking oral vitamin B6 can prevent and treat vitamin B6 deficiency (15).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Hyperhomocysteinemia. Taking vitamin B6 orally, alone or in combination with folic acid, is effective for reducing hyperhomocysteinemia. Details: Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) seems to lower homocysteine concentrations when folic acid and vitamin B12 are at physiologic levels or when given with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplements (9451,83042,107136). A combination of vitamin B6 100 mg and folic acid 0.5 mg daily seems to lower homocysteine levels by about 35% and is recommended for people with postprandial hyperhomocysteinemia (1489,9406). Other research shows that taking pyridoxine 50-200 mg daily reduces postprandial homocysteine levels by 32% to 35% (9406,10350). Pyridoxine also seems to reduce homocysteine levels in patients with kidney failure, kidney transplant patients (1489,6884,9414,9415), or patients who receive general anesthesia with nitrous oxide (9481). However, some research in healthy adults suggests that adding pyridoxine to folic acid might not provide any additional benefit over folic acid alone (9400,9405,9409,50145). Hyperhomocysteinemia is considered by some to be an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis, recurrent thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke (1899,3323,9402,9405,9408,9409). However, elevated homocysteine levels may be a marker, as opposed to a cause, of vascular disease (11387,11388). A 5 µmol/L increase in plasma homocysteine increases the risk of cerebrovascular disease by 50% and the odds of coronary heart disease by 60% and 80% in males and females, respectively (9407,9411). However, it is not clear if reducing homocysteine levels results in reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (1489,6883,6884,9308,9400,9405,9409). Folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 supplementation can reduce total homocysteine from 13.4 to 11 µmol/L. However, this reduction does not seem to help with secondary prevention of death or myocardial infarction, and some research even suggests an increase in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk (11387,13482,50423,83050,97619). There is also debate about whether supplementation with homocysteine-lowering B vitamins can reduce the risk of stroke. A number of large clinical studies and meta-analyses show that supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12, alone or in combination, does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with CVD or impaired renal function (11387,13482,50423,83050,96150). However, a more recent meta-analysis shows that B vitamin supplementation modestly reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo in patients at risk for or with a history of CVD (97619). Also, a meta-analysis in patients with a history of stroke shows that B vitamin supplementation modestly reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% and the risk of vascular death by 11% when compared with placebo (107136).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for patients with antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Details: Clinical research in male patients with hyperprolactinemia who are on a consistent antipsychotic dose shows that taking vitamin B6 300 mg twice daily for 16 weeks reduces serum prolactin levels by 68%, compared with 37% in patients taking aripiprazole 5 mg twice daily. Also, 67% of patients taking vitamin B6 had prolactin levels less than 40 mcg/mL versus 2% of those taking aripiprazole (107128).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Oral vitamin B6 seems to decrease urinary oxalate levels and decrease the risk of kidney stone formation in some patients. Details: There is some evidence that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) orally, alone or in combination with magnesium, can decrease urinary oxalate levels in people with type I primary hyperoxaluria, a hereditary disorder (1201,6437,6438,6439,6440,8548,8549,8550). Additionally, a small clinical study in this population suggests that intravenous pyridoxine hydrochloride can reduce urinary oxalate by 25.5% when compared to baseline (90796). In patients with idiopathic hyperoxaluria, taking a combination of pyridoxine 25mg and magnesium oxide 400 mg for 3 months decreases urinary oxalate by approximately 16%, with 68% of patients experiencing a reduction. However, supplementation is less effective than following a low-oxalate diet, which reduces urinary oxalate in 91% of patients by an average of 31% (107127). There is also preliminary evidence that higher pyridoxine intake in females with no history of kidney stones is associated with decreased risk of kidney stone formation (6441), but this association has not been found in males (6442).
• Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oral vitamin B6 may reduce nausea and vomiting in some pregnant patients and is sometimes used in combination with doxylamine. Details: While some conflicting evidence exists, most small clinical studies suggest that oral vitamin B6 is effective for improving nausea and vomiting associated with pregnancy when compared with baseline or placebo. However, vitamin B6 may not be as effective as ginger (110459). Two small clinical studies show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 25 mg every 8 hours for 3-4 days decreases pregnancy-induced nausea severity and vomiting incidence when compared with placebo (6168,16306). A larger clinical trial shows that taking lower doses of vitamin B6, 10 mg every 8 hours over 5 days, improves pregnancy-induced nausea, but not vomiting, when compared with placebo (6167). A small clinical study in patients with mild to moderate nausea and vomiting shows that taking a higher dose of 40 mg twice daily for 4 days is more effective than placebo, but no better than ginger 500 mg twice daily (99404). The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) considers vitamin B6 at a dose of 10-25 mg 3 to 4 times daily a first-line treatment for pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting due to its benign safety profile (111601). However, it is not effective for all patients, such as those with hyperemesis gravidarum, a severe form of pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Adding vitamin B6 20 mg three times daily for 2 weeks to intravenous rehydration, metoclopramide, and thiamine seems to be no more effective than placebo for reducing vomiting in hyperemesis gravidarum (99405). Vitamin B6 is also sometimes used in combination with doxylamine. In fact, a combination of vitamin B6 plus doxylamine (Diclegis or Bonjesta, Duchesnay Inc., and various generics) has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a prescription product111601). ACOG recommends vitamin B6 in combination with doxylamine as another first-line treatment option (111601). However, the clinical trial used to obtain FDA approval has some methodological problems, and the significance of the results has been questioned. The improvement in symptom scores seen with Diclegis was less than one point on a 13-point scale, which is unlikely to be clinically significant (97998). Also, some clinical research shows that taking pyridoxine 25 mg and doxylamine 12.5 mg is less effective than ondansetron 4 mg when taken every 8 hours for 5 days. Only 41% of the patients using pyridoxine and doxylamine had a clinically significant reduction in nausea, compared to 92% of patients using ondansetron (90797). The combination of vitamin B6 and doxylamine is also studied with acupuncture. A large clinical study in patients with moderate to severe pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting conducted in China shows that taking vitamin B6-doxylamine (Diclegis, Duchesnay, Inc) 20 to 40 mg each at bedtime for 14 days in combination with daily acupuncture modestly improves patient-reported nausea and vomiting scores when compared with either intervention alone (111820). However, it is unclear whether this improvement is clinically significant.
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Oral vitamin B6 seems to reduce PMS symptoms. Details: There is some evidence that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) orally can improve symptoms of PMS such as breast pain or tenderness (mastalgia) and depression in some patients. Pyridoxine in doses of at least 50 mg daily, plus magnesium oxide 200 mg daily, seems to relieve PMS-related anxiety and other symptoms (8555,39007,82962). Although some clinicians advocate doses of pyridoxine 200-500 mg daily for PMS, doses of 50-100 mg daily seem to work just as well. There is no apparent dose-response curve for PMS, so the lowest effective dose should be used. Higher doses might increase the risk of side effects (3093).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Age-related cognitive decline. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to slow age-related cognitive decline. Details: One clinical trial in elderly people with memory complaints shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 0.8 mg, vitamin B12 0.5 mg, and vitamin B6 (form not specified) 20 mg daily for 24 months reduces cerebral atrophy in the gray matter regions associated with Alzheimer disease by up to seven-fold when compared with placebo. However, this protection does not occur in patients with the lowest average blood levels of homocysteine (90374). Furthermore, other clinical research shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 3-75 mg daily in combination with folic acid and vitamin B12 does not improve cognitive function in elderly adults (14392,50225,50510).
• Alzheimer disease. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to improve cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer disease when used in combination with other B vitamins. Also, oral vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of developing this condition. Details: Clinical research in patients with probable Alzheimer disease taking routine medications shows that taking vitamin B6 25 mg with folic acid 5 mg and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for 18 months does not have a beneficial effect on cognitive function or the severity of disease when compared with placebo. In this study, all patients were consuming a folate-fortified diet (50319). Also, population research in elderly adults has found that a high intake of vitamin B6 from dietary or supplemental sources is not associated with a decreased risk of Alzheimer disease when compared to lower vitamin B6 intake (13165,15270).
• Carpal tunnel syndrome. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Details: Most research shows that people with carpal tunnel syndrome are not generally deficient in vitamin B6 and do not benefit from taking vitamin B6 supplements (8203,8937,9448,9450,9478,9482). Although early studies by a single group of researchers, as well as anecdotal reports, suggest that taking vitamin B6 may relieve carpal tunnel symptoms, more reliable research has not supported these findings (8202,9445,9447,9449,9483,15955,83086). Vitamin B6 has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome shows that taking a combination product containing vitamin B6, alpha-lipoic acid, acetyl-L-carnitine, phosphatidylserine, turmeric, and vitamins C, E, B1, B2, and B12 twice daily for 60 days reduces symptom severity and pain but does not improve measures of hand and wrist function when compared with a control (111702). The dose of vitamin B6 was not provided. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of blinding and placebo. Additionally, it is unclear if the effects are due to vitamin B6, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Cataracts. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to slow cataract development. Details: Clinical research in females with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or at increased risk of CVD shows that taking a combination of folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 (form not specified) 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for an average of 7.3 years does not reduce the risk of cataracts when compared with placebo. Furthermore, the risk of cataract extraction was increased by 28% (96149).
• Chemotherapy-induced acral erythema. While some conflicting evidence exists, most research suggests that oral or topical vitamin B6 does not seem to prevent or reduce the severity of acral erythema induced by chemotherapy. Details: A meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials and 4 observational studies shows that taking vitamin B6 60-500 mg daily for up to 8 chemotherapy cycles does not prevent chemotherapy-induced acral erythema or reduce the incidence of severe cases when compared with control. Most studies used capecitabine chemotherapy alone or in combination, and one study used pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; however, no subgroup analysis was conducted to differentiate chemotherapy regimens. Results did not seem to vary based on study location, study design, or vitamin B6 dose (104930). However, a more recent preliminary clinical study in patients receiving doxorubicin for multiple myeloma shows that taking vitamin B6 100 mg on the first day of chemotherapy then twice daily for 7 days with each cycle reduces the risk of developing acral erythema by 72%, but does not improve the severity of acral erythema, when compared with no vitamin B6 supplementation (110458). Also, one small, low-quality clinical study suggests that taking vitamin B6 400 mg daily reduces the risk of moderate or severe chemotherapy-induced acral erythema when compared with vitamin B6 200 mg daily; however, the higher dose also seems to be associated with worsened tumor response and increased treatment failure (97620). Topical vitamin B6 has also failed to show benefit. A small clinical study in patients with acral erythema from capecitabine or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin shows that applying vitamin B6 1% cream to affected areas three times daily for 6 weeks does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (104929).
• Colorectal adenoma. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of developing colorectal adenomas. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg, daily for up to 9.2 years does not reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma in females at high risk of cardiovascular disease when compared with placebo (90389).
• Eclampsia. Oral or intramuscular vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of eclampsia. Details: Meta-analyses of limited clinical research in pregnant patients show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), either as 25 mg daily or a single dose of 100 mg orally or intramuscularly, does not reduce the risk of eclampsia when compared with control (83046,96166).
• Osteoporosis. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Details: Clinical research in patients with cerebrovascular disease shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 2 mg, vitamin B6 (form not specified) 25 mg, and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily for up to 10.5 years does not prevent osteoporotic fractures when compared with placebo (90377). Furthermore, a secondary analysis of two large studies in patients with cardiovascular disease has found that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 40 mg daily in addition to folic acid and vitamin B12 for 1-3 years is associated with a 42% increased risk of hip fracture over an 11-year period when compared with only folic acid and vitamin B12 (96163). This finding is limited because these studies were not designed to assess the effects of vitamin B6 on fracture risk and the analyses were not adjusted for baseline bone health or fall risk.
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral or intramuscular vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia. Details: Meta-analyses of limited clinical research in pregnant patients show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), either as 25 mg daily or a single dose of 100 mg orally or intramuscularly, does not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia when compared with placebo (83046,96166).
• Preterm labor. Oral or intramuscular vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of preterm labor. Details: Meta-analyses of limited clinical research in pregnant patients shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), either as 25 mg daily or a single dose of 100 mg orally or intramuscularly, does not reduce the risk of preterm labor when compared with placebo (83046,96166).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults and children with inflammatory acne shows that taking 1-4 tablets of a specific product (NicAzel, Elorac Inc.) containing vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), nicotinamide, azelaic acid, zinc, copper, and folic acid for 8 weeks reduces inflammatory lesions and improves appearance in 88% and 81% of patients, respectively, when compared to baseline (90800). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large-scale clinical study shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 50 mg, vitamin B12 1000 mcg, and folic acid 2.5 mg daily reduces the risk for AMD in females over 40 years of age with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or with risk factors for CVD. Those who took this combination for an average of 7.3 years had a 34% reduced risk of developing AMD and a 41% reduced risk of visually significant AMD when compared with placebo (14620). It is unclear if this effect is due to vitamin B6, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Angioplasty. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Some evidence suggests that vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 10 mg, folic acid 1 mg, and vitamin B12 400 mcg daily can decrease the rate of restenosis in patients treated with balloon angioplasty (8009,9412). However, this combination does not seem to be as effective for reducing restenosis in patients after coronary stenting (8009). An intravenous loading dose of folic acid, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), and vitamin B12 followed by oral administration of folic acid 1.2 mcg, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 48 mg, and vitamin B12 60 mcg daily after bare metal coronary stenting also does not seem to reduce restenosis and might actually increase restenosis (12150,12151). Due to the lack of evidence of benefit and potential for harm, this combination of vitamins should not be recommended for patients receiving coronary stents (12151). It is unclear if any effects are due to vitamin B6, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Antipsychotic-induced metabolic side effects. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6, as an adjunct to progesterone, is beneficial in patients with antipsychotic-induced amenorrhea. Details: A small clinical study in females with antipsychotic-induced amenorrhea shows that taking vitamin B6 80 mg three times daily for 1 month plus intramuscular progesterone daily for 5 days increases levels of estradiol and follicle stimulating hormone, reduces prolactin levels, and increases the rate of clinical efficacy, defined as the normalization of menstruation and improvement in endocrine indicators, by 14% when compared with progesterone alone (110457).
• Anxiety. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with anxiety. Details: Clinical research in college students shows that taking vitamin B6 100 mg daily for one month does not reduce anxiety scores when compared with placebo (110453). However, because a diagnosis of anxiety was not a requirement for study participation, it is unclear if these findings can be generalized to patients diagnosed with anxiety.
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with asthma. Details: Preliminary clinical studies show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 200-300 mg daily may improve symptoms of asthma in some patients, but not others, when compared with placebo (7064,7065). Studies have yielded conflicting results, with some research suggesting that it may only be beneficial in children with severe asthma (7065). Additionally, some research suggests that theophylline may lower vitamin B6 levels, although it is unclear if vitamin B6 supplementation is beneficial (4522,7066,9503).
• Atherosclerosis. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with intermediate risk for coronary heart disease shows that taking a specific supplement (Kyolic, Total Heart Health, Formula 108, Wakunga) containing vitamin B6 12.5 mg, aged garlic extract 250 mg, vitamin B12 100 mcg, folic acid 300 mcg, and L-arginine 100 mg daily for 12 months reduces coronary artery calcium progression when compared with placebo (88385). It is unclear if this effect is due to vitamin B6, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with eczema. Details: A small clinical study in children with eczema shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) 50 mg daily for 4 weeks does not reduce symptoms such as redness and itchiness when compared with placebo (83090).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for ADHD. Details: A small crossover study in children with ADHD shows that taking vitamin B6 600 mg, niacinamide and ascorbic acid 3 grams, and calcium pantothenate 1.2 grams daily for 6 weeks does not improve behavior scores when compared with placebo (9957).
• Autism spectrum disorder. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B6 for autism, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B6 for this condition.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with type 1 bipolar disorder who are taking lithium and experiencing an acute episode of mania shows that taking vitamin B6 80 mg daily for 8 weeks does not improve cognitive function or the severity of mania when compared with placebo. Cognitive function was reduced in patients taking vitamin B6; any effect on sleep was unclear (107132).
• Cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces overall cancer risk. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin B6 is associated with a 22% reduced risk of cancer, including esophageal, pancreatic, gastric, colorectal, and breast cancer. However, when dietary and supplemental vitamin B6 intake is considered, the inverse association between vitamin B6 and cancer risk is weaker and limited to fewer tumor sites. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of 9 clinical studies shows that taking vitamin B6 3-100 mg orally daily for 2-7.3 years, in combination with vitamin B12 and folate, does not reduce the risk of cancer in patients with cardiovascular disease or kidney failure (96164).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral vitamin B6, taken along with other B vitamins, does not seem to improve secondary prevention of death or myocardial infarction in patients with CVD. However, it might slightly lower the risk of stroke. Details: Overall evidence from clinical research and meta-analyses shows that taking vitamin B6 in combination with folic acid and/or vitamin B12 does not seem to help with secondary prevention of death or myocardial infarction in patients with or at risk for CVD (11387,13482,34540,50423,83050,90379,97619). In fact, some research suggests that long-term supplementation with vitamin B6, folic acid, and vitamin B12 for secondary prevention increases the risk of CVD by 20% despite lowering homocysteine levels by 30% (13482). However, some research shows that taking vitamin B6 in combination with other B vitamins modestly reduces the risk of stroke, although results are conflicting (11387,13482,50423,83050,96150,96165,97619,107136). Additionally, it is unclear which specific combination of B vitamins is optimal for reducing stroke risk and which patients are most likely to benefit. In 2001, prior to the publication of the highest quality research on this topic, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368).
• Cognitive function. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in healthy adults aged 40-65 years shows that taking a supplement containing vitamin B6, ginkgo leaf, bacopa, and other B vitamins twice daily for 12 weeks does not improve memory or attention when compared with placebo (111334).
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces the risk of colorectal cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of observational studies suggests that the highest dietary intake of vitamin B6 is associated with a 20% reduced risk of colorectal cancer when compared with the lowest dietary intake. However, this association was not shown in subgroup analyses of studies conducted in Australia, Europe, or North America (111600). The validity of this analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies.
• Dental caries. There is limited evidence on the oral use of vitamin B6 for dental decay during pregnancy. Details: Meta-analyses of limited clinical research show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), 25 mg daily or a single dose of 100 mg orally or intramuscularly, may reduce the risk of dental decay during pregnancy when compared with placebo (83046,96166).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces the risk of developing depression or improves symptoms of depression. Details: Clinical research in healthy college students shows that taking vitamin B6 100 mg daily for one month does not reduce depression scores when compared with placebo (1104453). However, because a diagnosis of depression was not a requirement for study participation, it is unclear if these findings can be generalized to patients diagnosed with depression. Whether vitamin B6 reduces the risk of developing depression is also unclear. A meta-analysis of population research has found that the highest dietary intake of vitamin B6 is associated with a 19% lower risk of depression when compared with the lowest intake. However, sub-analyses suggest that this association is only relevant in females and not males (107133). In one individual population study in community dwelling older adults included in the analysis, the consumption of at least 1.71 mg of vitamin B6 daily from food was associated with a 43% reduction in the likelihood of becoming depressed when compared with the consumption of 1.33 mg or less daily in females. However, there was no association between vitamin B6 levels and risk of depression in males, and the finding in females was no longer significant when adjusted for total energy intake, since foods rich in vitamin B6 are energy-dense (96168). Another observational longitudinal study in healthy adults starting oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel has found that taking vitamin B6 25 mg daily for 6-12 months is associated with a 40% lower risk of depression when compared with no supplementation (90789). Most available studies are cross-sectional in nature, making any conclusions related to causation difficult.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with type 2 diabetes or gestational diabetes. Details: Observational research in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes has found that dietary intake of vitamin B6 in the highest quartile is associated with 53% lower odds of developing cardiovascular disease, defined as a non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina, when compared with vitamin B6 intake in the lowest quartile (110452). Small clinical studies in patients with gestational diabetes and vitamin B6 deficiency shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 100 mg daily for 2 weeks improves glucose tolerance and blood glucose levels when compared with baseline (82967,83088). However, there is concern that these findings were confounded by dietary alterations. This benefit was not observed in a subsequent small case series in patients with gestational diabetes (22380).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research suggests that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid (L-methylfolate), vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin), and vitamin B6 (pyridoxal-5'-phosphate) for 24 weeks does not improve neural dysfunction based on vibration perception when compared with placebo in patients with diabetic neuropathy. However, taking this combination appears to modestly improve neuropathy symptoms and quality of life related to mental functioning when compared with placebo (90375).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with dysmenorrhea. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking vitamin B6 (form not specified) 200 mg daily reduces pain associated with dysmenorrhea when compared with placebo. However, taking vitamin B6 in combination with magnesium does not reduce pain when compared with placebo (77388).
• Fibromyalgia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with fibromyalgia. Details: A small clinical study in patients with fibromyalgia shows that taking vitamin B6 80 mg daily for 8 weeks does not improve pain, disease severity, anxiety, depression, or quality of life when compared with placebo (110454).
• Gastroenteritis-associated nausea and vomiting. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in children with gastroenteritis. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 6 months to 12 years with acute viral gastroenteritis shows that taking vitamin B6 (form not specified) does not improve symptoms of dehydration or the frequency of vomiting when compared with placebo (90793).
• Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for Helicobacter pylori. Details: A large clinical study in adults with Helicobacter pylori infection shows that taking vitamin B6 20 mg twice daily for 2 weeks alongside conventional quadruple therapy does not improve eradication rates when compared with a control group not receiving vitamin B6 (113551). Conventional therapy consisted of a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, minocycline, and metronidazole. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of placebo and inadequate blinding.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces blood pressure. Details: One small clinical study in patients with essential hypertension shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) 5 mg/kg daily for 4 weeks can reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure when compared with baseline (83091). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Hypertriglyceridemia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces triglyceride levels. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that vitamin B6 (form not specified) 50 mg daily for 12 weeks does not reduce triglyceride levels in people with hypertriglyceridemia when compared with placebo. However, vitamin B6 appears to decrease total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by approximately 9% in these patients (59028).
• Infertility. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B6 for infertility, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B6 for this condition.
• Insomnia. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in healthy adults with self-reported sleep difficulty shows that taking a specific product (LZ Complex3, Sanofi Consumer Healthcare Pty Ltd.) containing vitamin B6, zizyphus extract, hops extract, hydrolyzed milk protein (Lactium), and magnesium oxide nightly, 30 minutes before bed, for 2 weeks does not improve sleep quality, daytime functioning, or physical fatigue when compared with placebo. However, due to the large improvement seen in both the treatment and placebo groups, the effectiveness of this product is unclear (95971).
• Isoniazid-induced neuropathy. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 prevents the development of neuropathy in patients taking isoniazid. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients taking isoniazid for tuberculosis shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 6 mg daily reduces the development of neuropathy when compared with control (83068).
• Lactation. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 helps to suppress postpartum lactation. Details: A meta-analysis of two small clinical trials shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 400-600 mg daily for 6-7 days postpartum does not suppress lactation when compared with no treatment (83047).
• Levetiracetam-induced side effects. While some conflicting evidence exists, several small, low-quality studies suggest that oral vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) may reduce some neuropsychiatric adverse effects related to the use of levetiracetam. Details: In an analysis of case reports, retrospective studies, and a single low-quality prospective study, improvement in levetiracetam-associated neuropsychiatric symptoms occurred in approximately 73% of patients taking pyridoxine (107137). A more recent preliminary clinical trial in children ages 1-17 years shows that taking pyridoxine 10 or 15 mg/kg daily as needed based on symptoms improves behavioral side effects associated with levetiracetam by a small amount when compared with low-dose pyridoxine 0.5 mg/kg daily used as placebo (107124). Also, observational research in children ages 9 months to 14 years has found that taking vitamin B6 is associated with improved behavior and a 44% lower risk of levetiracetam discontinuation when compared with no vitamin B6 supplementation (110455). Some observational research in adults with levetiracetam-associated irritability has found that taking vitamin B6 is associated with an improvement in irritability in 45% of patients when compared to baseline (107129). However, a small clinical trial in adults with epilepsy shows that taking pyridoxine 40 mg daily for 3 weeks does not improve levetiracetam-related psychiatric adverse effects when compared with placebo (110456). This study may have been underpowered to detect differences between groups. Pyridoxine doses used in the studies above have ranged from 50-400 mg daily in children and 40-600 mg daily in adults (107124,107129,107137,110456).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if dietary or oral vitamin B6 reduces lung cancer risk. Details: Epidemiological research has found that higher serum levels of vitamin B6 in male smokers is associated with a lower risk of lung cancer (9454). Also, people with blood levels of vitamin B6 in the top quartile have a modestly lower risk of lung cancer when compared with those whose levels are in the lowest quartile. The association is stronger for males and for people who have smoked (97999). However, other epidemiological research found that increased dietary intake of vitamin B6 is not associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer (96164).
• Menopausal symptoms. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B6 for menopausal symptoms, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B6 for this condition.
• Motion sickness. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B6 for motion sickness, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B6 for this condition.
• Nausea and vomiting. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for nausea and vomiting in patients taking oral contraceptives or antibiotics for Helicobacter pylori. Details: A large clinical study in adults with Helicobacter pylori infection shows that taking vitamin B6 20 mg twice daily for 2 weeks alongside conventional quadruple therapy reduces the incidence and severity of gastrointestinal adverse effects when compared with a control group not receiving vitamin B6 (113551). Conventional therapy consisted of a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, minocycline, and metronidazole. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of placebo and inadequate blinding. An observational longitudinal study in healthy females taking oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel has found that taking vitamin B6 25 mg daily for 6-12 months is associated with a 43% reduced risk of nausea when compared with no supplementation (90789).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 for patients with NAFLD. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with NAFLD shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 30 mg three times daily for 12 weeks does not reduce levels of liver transaminases or plasma lipids when compared with baseline. However, hepatic fat accumulation was modestly reduced (107130). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 in beneficial in overweight or obese individuals. Details: A small clinical trial in females with a body mass index (BMI) of at least 25 kg/m² shows that taking vitamin B6 as pyridoxine 80 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces fat mass and improves insulin resistance and triglyceride levels by a small amount when compared with placebo. Although some other anthropometric and metabolic indices were improved when compared with baseline, there was no effect of pyridoxine on body weight, visceral adiposity, or other endpoints when compared with placebo (107131).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces the risk of overall mortality. Details: Observational research in US adults has found that dietary intake of vitamin B6 in the highest quintile is associated with a 12% to 21% lower risk of all-cause mortality and a 31% to 44% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality when compared with the lowest quintile of dietary vitamin B6 intake (110451).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer. Details: Observational research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin B6 is associated with a 37% lower risk of developing pancreatic cancer when compared with lower intake (104927).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with postpartum depression. Details: Preliminary clinical research in individuals considered at increased risk for postpartum depression, but without clinical depression, shows that taking vitamin B6 80 mg daily from the 28th week of pregnancy until birth, and then 40 mg daily for one month, reduces symptoms of depression 1.5 months after birth when compared with baseline (measured during the third trimester) and when compared with placebo. However, it is unclear if any of the patients included in the study developed postpartum depression, as there were no changes in overall symptoms in patients taking placebo (107126).
• Proton pump inhibitor-induced gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for proton pump inhibitor-induced GI symptoms. Details: A large clinical study in adults with Helicobacter pylori infection shows that taking vitamin B6 20 mg twice daily for 2 weeks alongside conventional quadruple therapy reduces the incidence and severity of gastrointestinal adverse effects when compared with a control group not receiving vitamin B6 (113551). Conventional therapy consisted of a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, minocycline, and metronidazole. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of placebo and inadequate blinding.
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with RLS. Details: A small clinical study in adults with RLS who are beginning treatment with pramipexole shows that also taking vitamin B6 40 mg daily for 2 months moderately improves RLS scores and sleep quality scores when compared with pramipexole and placebo (110052).
• Schizophrenia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Details: Clinical research in male patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia who are on a consistent antipsychotic dose shows that adding vitamin B6 300 mg twice daily for 16 weeks modestly improves psychotic symptoms and some measures of cognitive performance when compared with adding aripiprazole 5 mg twice daily (107128). More research is needed to determine if these benefits are clinically relevant.
• Seizures. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for preventing seizures in patients with glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) deficiency. Details: Observational case series in a small number of children and young adults with GPI deficiency has found that taking vitamin B6 20-30 mg/kg daily for 3-12 months is associated with some reduction in seizure frequency in 9 of 13 patients. However, no patient reached seizure freedom (107125,107135). In one case series, treatment for 12 months was associated with modest developmental improvements in almost all patients (107135). The study patient populations were slightly different in terms of age and underlying genetic causes for GPI deficiency.
• Sickle cell disease. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other B vitamins; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with sickle cell disease shows that taking vitamin B6 4.2-6 mg, vitamin B12 4.2-6 mcg, and folic acid 700 mcg daily might lower homocysteine levels. However, it is unknown if this will reduce the risk of endothelial damage in these patients (9324).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6, either alone or with other B vitamins, is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: There is some debate about whether supplementation with homocysteine-lowering B vitamins, including vitamin B6, can reduce the risk of stroke. A number of clinical studies and meta-analyses show that supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12, alone or in combination, does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or impaired kidney function (11387,13482,50423,83050,96150). However, a more recent meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials, including over 44,000 patients at risk for or with a history of CVD, shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo (97619). This meta-analysis differed from some of the earlier analyses due to the inclusion of several additional clinical trials. Also, another meta-analysis of three clinical trials including 9900 patients with a history of stroke shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% when compared with placebo, although this finding was determined to have a low level of certainty. Based on two clinical trials, there was also a 17% reduced risk of vascular death and an 11% reduction in the combined risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death (107136). In 2001, prior to the publication of the highest quality research on this topic, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368). Unfortunately, even after the publication of higher quality research, it is still unclear which specific combination of B vitamins is optimal and which patients are most likely to benefit. One network meta-analysis shows that a combination of folic acid and vitamin B6 lowers the risk of stroke more effectively than B vitamin mixtures that include vitamin B12 (96165). However, this analysis is limited because it didn't account for dosing. Exposure to low, but not high amounts, of vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) seems to reduce stroke risk (96150).
• Tardive dyskinesia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 prevents tardive dyskinesia in patients taking neuroleptic drugs. Details: A small clinical study in patients taking neuroleptic drugs for schizophrenia shows that taking vitamin B6 (form not specified) 400 mg daily seems to improve Parkinsonian, dystonic, and dyskinetic symptoms when compared with placebo (8558).
• Tourette syndrome. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small, nonblinded clinical study in children aged 4-17 years with untreated Tourette syndrome or with chronic tic disorder and associated symptoms of anxiety shows that taking a liquid nutritional supplement providing vitamin B6 2.8 mg and L-theanine 200 mg daily for 2 months improves scores on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale, but does not reduce anxiety, when compared with patients receiving psychoeducation (108555). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Vincristine-induced neuropathy. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with pyridostigmine; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children ages 11 months to 13 years with neuropathy due to vincristine treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, shows that taking vitamin B6 150 mg/m2 and pyridostigmine 3 mg/kg twice daily for 3 months is associated with reduced severity of sensory and motor neuropathy when compared with baseline (104928). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group. More evidence is needed to rate vitamin B6 for these uses.

(Read more about VITAMIN B6)

EFFECTIVE

• Familial hypophosphatemia. Oral vitamin D in combination with phosphate is effective for bone disorders in patients with familial hypophosphatemia. Details: Taking calcitriol or dihydrotachysterol orally in combination with phosphate supplements is effective for treating bone disorders in people with familial hypophosphatemia (11818).
• Hypoparathyroidism. Oral vitamin D increases serum calcium concentrations in people with hypoparathyroidism or pseudohypoparathyroidism. Details: Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) is effective in high doses for increasing serum calcium concentrations in people with hypoparathyroidism or pseudohypoparathyroidism (11820). Also, taking vitamin D (form unspecified) or calcitriol postoperatively is effective for preventing hypocalcemia in people with hypoparathyroidism due to thyroidectomy (39045).
• Osteomalacia. Oral vitamin D is effective for osteomalacia. Details: Oral calcifediol is effective for treating osteomalacia secondary to liver disease (hepatic osteodystrophy) and anticonvulsant-induced osteomalacia. Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) is effective for osteomalacia due to malabsorption syndromes, Fanconi syndrome, and corticosteroid-induced osteomalacia (11819,11821).
• Renal osteodystrophy. Oral calcitriol prevents renal osteodystrophy in patients with chronic renal failure. Details: Taking calcitriol orally manages hypocalcemia and prevents renal osteodystrophy in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing dialysis (11823).
• Rickets. Oral vitamin D prevents and treats rickets. Details: Vitamin D is effective for preventing and treating rickets, a consequence of vitamin D deficiency. Calcitriol should be used in patients with renal failure (11824). Clinical practice guidelines from the Endocrine Society conditionally recommend, based on low certainty of evidence, empiric vitamin D supplementation from vitamin D fortified foods, vitamin D supplements, or vitamin formulations that contain vitamin D to prevent nutritional rickets in children and adolescents aged 1 to 18 years. Empiric vitamin D supplementation is defined as supplementing with vitamin D above the Recommended Dietary Allowance without having tested serum vitamin D status (114502). A large clinical study in pregnant adults shows that taking vitamin D 28,000 IU weekly from the second trimester up to 6 months post-partum decreases the risk of biochemical rickets by about 84% in the offspring at 6-12 months of age when compared with placebo. However, taking vitamin D 4200, 16,800, or 28,000 IU weekly from the second trimester to delivery does not decrease the risk of rickets in the offspring when compared with placebo (114503).
• Vitamin D deficiency. Oral vitamin D prevents and treats vitamin D deficiency. Details: Vitamin D is effective for preventing and treating vitamin D deficiency using a wide range of doses and dosing frequencies (7555,16888,16891,17476,115590). Optimal blood levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for maintaining bone density is controversial; however, it is typically estimated that blood levels of 20-100 ng/mL are needed. Toxicity usually does not occur until levels exceed 150 ng/mL (17476,93945). Vitamin D also alleviates symptoms and syndromes associated with vitamin D deficiency. Administering vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) intramuscularly or orally seems to help treat severe proximal myopathy associated with severe vitamin D deficiency. Several case reports suggest vitamin D therapy can provide prompt relief of muscle weakness and restore mobility (11923,84348,84687).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral vitamin D prevents corticosteroid-induced osteopenia and osteoporosis. Details: Taking calcifediol, cholecalciferol, calcitriol, or alfacalcidol orally prevents corticosteroid-induced osteopenia and osteoporosis (7555,83933). Vitamin D3 metabolites, including calcitriol and alfacalcidol, seem to be more effective at preventing bone loss compared to cholecalciferol in these patients, although the vitamin D3 metabolites seem to be inferior to bisphosphonates (83955). Furthermore, taking activated vitamin D or other forms of vitamin D alone or along with calcium improves bone mineral density in people with corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (38493,38581).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate intake of vitamin D in conjunction with adequate calcium intake helps to prevent the progression of osteoporosis. It might also reduce the risk of a first fracture in some patients. However, its place in the prevention of secondary fracture is unclear. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate vitamin D intake of 800-1000 IU daily along with adequate calcium intake for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake, with a target serum vitamin D level of 30 ng/mL (109425). In the US, foods that contain at least 120 IU vitamin D can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate vitamin D intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (97001). However, vitamin D supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Clinical research shows that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) and calcium can decrease postmenopausal bone loss, improve bone density, help prevent osteoporosis, and decrease the risk of fractures (10932,12926,12930,12934,12952) (38973,39015,39026,84003,113584). According to one analysis, taking oral vitamin D3 700-800 IU daily with or without calcium reduces fracture risk in ambulatory and institutionalized elderly people (12933). Other analyses suggest that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol, ergocalciferol, calcifediol, calcitriol, or alfacalcidol with or without calcium can reduce the risk of all fractures by up to 17%, nonvertebral fractures by up to 49%, and hip fractures by up to 30% in older adults. However, the incidence of vertebral fractures does not appear to be reduced with vitamin D supplementation (38942,38970,38973,39015,39026,84660,109053). Despite the majority of research showing benefit, some studies have not found a positive effect of vitamin D on fracture risk. Some analyses of clinical evidence, including patients with and without osteoporosis, show that taking vitamin D3 or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) alone does not reduce fracture risk, suggesting that adequate calcium intake is needed for any benefit to be realized (39015,84471). Also, some evidence suggests that vitamin D3 400 IU daily is not effective for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in elderly nursing home residents (109053). Another clinical trial found that taking vitamin D3 800 IU daily with calcium 1200-1500 mg daily for 2 years does not increase bone mineral density (BMD) in Black postmenopausal adults. This may be due to the fact that Black females have a lower rate of bone remodeling, an increased calcium absorption efficiency, and reduced calcium excretion when compared with other ethnic groups; therefore, supplementation with vitamin D3 and calcium might not be as beneficial in these patients (16878). There is concern that vitamin D might not be effective for secondary prevention of fractures in elderly patients. A meta-analysis of clinical studies, including many studies cited above, and a large clinical study in elderly adults with a previous osteoporotic fracture show that taking vitamin D3 400-4000 IU daily or as a single dose up to 500,000 IU orally or injected annually with or without calcium 480-1200 mg daily for up to 5 years does not reduce the risk of hip, vertebral, or other fractures when compared with placebo or no treatment (13073,112486). Another study also shows that taking vitamin D3 800 IU and calcium 1000 mg daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (under 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). However, these studies have been criticized for failing to measure vitamin D levels and low adherence to study protocol (12931). Also, one of these studies did not use a placebo control (12929). Taking alfacalcidol orally seems to maintain BMD in prostatic carcinoma patients at risk for osteoporosis when treated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-a). Alfacalcidol maintains, but does not increase, BMD in these patients (6360).
• Psoriasis. Topical vitamin D or vitamin D analogues improve symptoms of psoriasis. This benefit is not seen with oral vitamin D. Details: Topical application of vitamin D in the form of calcitriol or other vitamin D analogues, such as calcipotriene, maxacalcitol, and paricalcitol, effectively treats plaque psoriasis in some patients, including those with chronic plaque psoriasis (11822,84325). Applying topical vitamin D or its analogues in combination with topical corticosteroids such as betamethasone seems to be more effective for treating plaque psoriasis than either agent used alone (22283,82572,84325,84536,84647). Despite evidence that patients with psoriasis have low baseline serum levels of vitamin D, taking oral vitamin D does not seem to prevent psoriasis, improve symptoms, or reduce the severity of psoriasis in general (11822,22283,82572,84325,84536,84647,98193,108426,112481,112482). An analysis of a large clinical study in older adults with mild psoriasis shows that taking a vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) loading dose of 200,000 IU followed by vitamin D3 100,000 IU monthly for 1 year does not affect the severity or spread of psoriasis when compared with placebo (98193).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Some research suggests that oral vitamin D reduces symptoms of allergic rhinitis in children and adults. It is unclear if oral vitamin D during pregnancy is beneficial for the prevention of allergic rhinitis in the child. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with allergic rhinitis and vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks along with cetirizine improves overall symptom severity when compared with placebo and cetirizine. This improvement was not significant at 4 weeks, suggesting that symptom improvement might not occur until vitamin D has been adequately replenished (102120). Another moderate-sized clinical study conducted in China in adults with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis and vitamin D levels at the low end of the normal range shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily for 4 weeks along with mometasone nasal spray improves runny nose, itchy nose, and nasal congestion but does not reduce sneezing when compared with placebo and mometasone (112483). In children aged 5-15 years, 4 small- or moderate-sized clinical trials show that taking vitamin D 800 IU or 1000 IU daily for 1-6 months modestly reduces symptoms such as nasal congestion and rhinorrhea when compared with placebo or no supplementation (109728). It is unclear whether these children had vitamin D deficiency at baseline. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy has also been evaluated. A meta-analysis of three large clinical studies shows that prenatal vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of the child developing allergic rhinitis when compared with low-dose vitamin D, placebo, or no intervention (108438).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Clinical research suggests that vitamin D deficiency is associated with greater risk for and severity of COVID-19 infection. Research of varying quality has evaluated the use of vitamin D supplementation in adults with COVID-19 infection, suggesting that it does not reduce overall mortality, but may reduce the risk of intubation and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). It is unclear whether any benefits are correlated to baseline vitamin D status. Details: Clinical and observational research suggests that prophylactic vitamin D supplementation may reduce the risk for and severity of COVID-19 infection in people with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency at baseline. An umbrella review of meta-analyses summarizing data from 9 observational studies suggests that vitamin D deficiency is associated with an increased risk for COVID-19 infection and a greater severity of illness when compared with control (114583). Additionally, a separate meta-analysis of 12 observational studies conducted early in the COVID-19 pandemic suggests that low baseline vitamin D status (25-hydroxyvitamin D levels below 30 ng/mL) is associated with a greater risk of severe COVID-19 pneumonia and mortality when compared with higher levels. However, patients with lower vitamin D levels were also more likely to have baseline hypertension and cardiovascular disease (107206). While earlier meta-analyses suggested that vitamin D supplementation did not prevent COVID-19 (109040,112488), a larger and more recent meta-analysis of 5 clinical studies conducted in healthcare workers, of whom 85-94% had vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency, shows that taking vitamin D reduces the odds of developing a COVID-19 infection by about 80% when compared with control. A separate meta-analysis of 2 clinical studies in the general population found no correlation between vitamin D supplementation and risk of COVID-19 infection; however, the people in these studies had adequate vitamin D levels at baseline (113590). The benefits of vitamin D prophylaxis in people with sufficient vitamin D levels is unclear. Clinical studies have evaluated the use of vitamin D supplementation in hospitalized adults with COVID-19, assessing hospital length of stay (LOS), the risk of ICU admission, and rate of intubation. Although meta-analyses conducted in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic did not identify an association between vitamin D supplementation and any of these outcomes (107206,109733,112490), more recent meta-analyses suggest benefit in certain populations. Meta-analyses of clinical studies in adults with COVID-19 show that vitamin D supplementation may be correlated with a modest reduction in hospital LOS in certain patients when compared with placebo or a lower dose of vitamin D. Subgroup analyses suggest that this reduction may be limited to patients with non-severe disease and those aged 60-65 years and older (115575,115578). Additionally, more recent meta-analyses of clinical studies show that vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of admission to the ICU when compared with control, although the odds ratio varies depending on the analysis conducted (112488,112490,115578). Similarly, meta-analyses of observational studies suggest that vitamin D supplementation is associated with a reduced odds of ICU admission when compared with control (113590,115578). Also, meta-analyses of clinical studies show that vitamin D supplementation modestly reduces the risk of intubation when compared with control (112488,115578). Meta-analyses of observational studies, as well as studies conducted early in the COVID-19 pandemic, originally suggested a potential reduction in mortality with the use of vitamin D supplementation during hospitalization (109040,114583,115578). However, more recent meta-analyses of prospective clinical studies do not support this finding. A meta-analysis of 19 clinical studies in adults with moderate to severe COVID-19 shows that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce mortality when compared with placebo or standard care, when controlling for heterogeneity. Additionally, a subgroup analysis of 13 clinical studies administering high-dose vitamin D does not show a reduction in mortality (115576). Other meta-analyses of clinical studies also show that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce mortality when compared with control, regardless of baseline vitamin D status (114488,115578). In most studies that provided vitamin D to hospitalized patients, oral doses ranged from 1000-25,000 IU daily for 1-3 weeks, 10,000-25,000 weekly for up to 6 weeks or until hospital discharge, or as a single 140,000-600,000 IU dose. In some studies, vitamin D 200,000-500,000 IU was administered intramuscularly as a single dose. Cholecalciferol was the most common form administered. However, some studies used calcitriol or calcifediol (107206,107208,109040,109733,112488,112490,113590,114583,115575,115578). Overall, the validity of the findings from meta-analyses is limited by the significant heterogeneity of the included studies, which enrolled patients of varying age, disease severity, and baseline vitamin D status, and implemented highly variable vitamin D supplementation protocols. The relationship between vitamin D levels and COVID-19 has also been evaluated in pregnant adults. A meta-analysis of observational research suggests that, while lower vitamin D levels are not associated with an increased risk of COVID-19, the presence of severe COVID-19 symptoms during pregnancy may be correlated to lower vitamin D levels when compared with non-severe COVID-19 symptoms (112025). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for post-COVID-19 symptoms. A clinical study in adults with vitamin D deficiency, as well as fatigue and neuropsychiatric symptoms for at least one month post-COVID-19, shows that taking vitamin D 60,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks modestly improves fatigue, anxiety, and some aspects of cognitive function, but not symptoms of depression, when compared with placebo (115580). It is unclear if the improvements in anxiety and cognitive function were clinically significant. Additionally, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial in adults with adequate baseline vitamin D levels.
• Dental caries. Some research suggests that oral vitamin D reduces the risk of dental caries in children. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research suggests that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) reduces the risk of cavities by 49%, and vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) reduces the risk by 36% when compared with placebo in infants, children, and adolescents (84690). The validity of this finding is limited by the heterogeneity of the included trials. Also, clinical research shows an inverse correlation between cord blood vitamin D status and the number of decayed primary teeth in the infant at 12 months of age (104620). However, this same research shows that taking two oral prenatal doses of vitamin D2 50,000 IU during pregnancy does not prevent dental caries in the infant at 12 months of age or increase vitamin D levels in the cord blood (104620).
• Heart failure. Limited research suggests that oral vitamin D reduces the risk of developing heart failure in some patients. However, vitamin D does not seem to improve outcomes in patients that have already developed heart failure. Details: Population research has found that vitamin D levels below 15 ng/mL are associated with increased risk of developing heart failure (16615). A meta-analysis of 17 trials, including the landmark Randomized Evaluation of Calcium Or vitamin D (RECORD) trial, shows that vitamin D reduces the risk of heart failure by 21% compared to not taking vitamin D in patients 60 years or older (91343). This finding is limited because none of the included trials were designed to determine effects on cardiovascular outcomes. In contrast, a secondary analysis of data from the Women's Health Initiative trial shows that taking vitamin D 400 IU with calcium 1000 mg daily is not associated with a reduced risk of heart failure in postmenopausal adults. However, a subgroup analysis of that trial shows that taking vitamin D plus calcium is associated with a 37% lower risk of developing heart failure in postmenopausal adults classified as low-risk for heart failure at baseline. It is speculated that high-risk patients might not benefit from vitamin D plus calcium due to negative interactions with medications used to manage cardiovascular risk factors in this group (97307). While vitamin D might be associated with a reduced risk of developing heart failure, most evidence suggests that vitamin D is not beneficial in patients already diagnosed with heart failure. In one small clinical trial, taking vitamin D3 50,000 IU weekly along with calcium citrate 800 mg daily for 6 months was not associated with an improvement in 6-minute walk test, timed get up and go test (TGUG), electrocardiographic variables, or health status when compared with placebo in adults with heart failure; mortality was not evaluated (97299,97300). In another clinical trial, taking vitamin D3 2000 IU daily did not decrease the risk of mortality when compared with placebo in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2 heart failure patients (16620).
• Hyperparathyroidism-related bone loss. Limited evidence suggests that oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with this condition. Details: Taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) orally seems to help decrease secondary hyperparathyroidism and bone turnover in females. In one study, supplementation with vitamin D3 increased serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, reduced levels of parathyroid hormone, and decreased production of markers of bone turnover (3463).
• Respiratory tract infections. Clinical research shows that oral vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in children but not in adults or older adults. Some clinical practice guidelines recommend vitamin D supplements or fortified foods for children to potentially lower the risk of RTIs. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the treatment of RTIs. Details: Prenatally, increased levels of vitamin D during pregnancy have been associated with a lower incidence of childhood RTIs (98197). However, two meta-analyses of small clinical studies and one meta-analysis of large clinical studies show no effect of prenatal vitamin D supplementation on the incidence of infant or childhood RTIs, including lower RTIs, when compared with control. Results related to risk of wheeze are conflicting (95910,95912,108438). In children, most research shows that vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of RTIs. A meta-analysis of clinical trials in children aged 1-16 years shows that taking vitamin D decreases the odds of having an RTI by about 29% when compared with control, although this study also identified a high likelihood of publication bias (105721). Daily or weekly vitamin D doses seem to be more beneficial than single bolus doses, although the largest meta-analysis failed to confirm this result (84689,93766,105721). One clinical study in preterm Black infants shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 200 IU daily and then 400 IU daily until 6 months of age does not affect the rate of RTIs, but does reduce wheeze by 11%, when compared with a normal diet without vitamin D supplementation (98191). This study may not have been powered to detect a difference in RTIs between groups. Clinical practice guidelines from the Endocrine Society conditionally recommend, based on low certainty of evidence, empiric vitamin D supplementation from vitamin D fortified foods, vitamin D supplements, or vitamin formulations that contain vitamin D to potentially lower the risk of RTIs in children and adolescents aged 1 to 18 years. Empiric vitamin D supplementation is defined as supplementing with vitamin D above the Recommended Dietary Allowance without having tested serum vitamin D status (114502). In adults, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to reduce the risk of RTIs. Observational research in adults has found that low levels of vitamin D are associated with worsened RTI complications, and even increased mortality in older adults ages 50-75 years (103659). However, meta-analyses of prospective clinical trials in adults show that taking vitamin D supplements 300-4000 IU daily for 7 weeks to 5 years or taking vitamin D 30,000-100,000 IU monthly or 96,000-120,000 IU every 2 months for 1-5 years does not reduce the odds of developing an RTI or severe respiratory complications, such as emergency department utilization, hospitalization, and death, when compared with placebo. These results were similar in subgroup analyses evaluating overall vitamin D dose and baseline vitamin D status (84689,105721,114506). The largest single clinical trial, conducted in adults at least 60 years of age, shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 60,000 IU once monthly for up to 5 years reduces the duration of total and severe respiratory symptoms by approximately 0.5 days, but does not reduce the incidence of respiratory illness or hospitalization, when compared with placebo (105726,110825). When adults and children are evaluated together, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to reduce the risk of respiratory infections. Two large meta-analyses of 40 clinical studies in both children and adults shows that taking vitamin D does not reduce the risk of acute RTIs. While subgroup analyses suggest a potential modest reduction in risk of acute RTIs in studies not exceeding 4 months' duration and with daily supplementation of 400-1200 IU during winter, spring, and autumn, these findings are limited by the low quality of the evidence and publication bias (108435,115582). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the treatment of RTIs. A large meta-analysis of clinical studies in both children and adults shows that taking vitamin D improves outcomes (e.g., sputum conversion, survival rate, therapeutic success, need for intensive care admission) by a small, but not clinically relevant, amount. In subgroup analyses, these beneficial effects only persisted in studies considered to be of low quality (108436). The validity of these findings is limited by publication bias.
• Tooth retention. Oral vitamin D with calcium seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily along with calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Most research shows that taking vitamin D with or without calcium does not reduce the risk of CVD or CVD complications. There is some speculation that there might be modest benefit in the elderly, but more research is needed to confirm. Details: Population research has found that low vitamin D levels, especially those below 15 ng/mL, are associated with an increased risk of developing CVD (15630,16618,93944,113588). However, taking vitamin D supplements does not seem to prevent CVD. The majority of evidence from clinical research, population research, and meta-analyses shows that vitamin D supplementation, with or without calcium, does not reduce the risk of mortality, myocardial infarction, cardiac-related hospitalizations, or stroke when compared with placebo in patients with or without CVD risk factors (91343,97296,97305,97308,98902,98916,99762,109729,110811,110827)(112021,112022,113588). The most reliable evidence comes from two meta-analyses of mainly high-quality clinical research investigating the effect of supplementation with vitamin D alone or with calcium for at least 1 year. These analyses show that vitamin D does not reduce major adverse cardiovascular events, stroke, CVD mortality, or all-cause mortality, regardless of baseline vitamin D level, vitamin D dosage, sex, formulation, or concomitant calcium supplementation (99762,109729). One large clinical trial in individuals at increased CVD risk shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol 60,000 IU monthly modestly INCREASES the risk of CVD- and presumed CVD-related mortality (110827). The effect of vitamin D supplementation in elderly adults on CVD outcomes has also been evaluated. In some research, taking vitamin D 700-1000 IU daily shows a trend towards lower CVD events and reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in elderly patients (11931,98916,99762). However, another study in adults aged 70 years or older without a history of cardiovascular events and who are vitamin D replete at baseline shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 3 years does not decrease the risk of coronary heart disease, heart failure, stroke, or hypertension when compared with placebo (113581). Larger, high-quality trials with prespecified primary outcomes are needed to determine whether or not vitamin D supplementation reduces CVD risk in elderly populations.
• Critical illness (trauma). Taking vitamin D 540,000 IU as a single oral dose does not reduce death or hospital stay in critically ill patients. However, limited research suggests that taking a smaller dose of vitamin D long-term might have a modest benefit. Details: The most robust evidence to date shows that correcting vitamin D levels in critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency does not reduce mortality rate or duration of hospital stay. A large, multicenter clinical study in critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency shows that administering a single, enteral dose of vitamin D 540,000 IU does not reduce 90-day all-cause mortality, duration of hospital stay, ventilator-free days, or other clinical outcomes when compared with placebo (103656). A previous meta-analysis of clinical research showed that vitamin D supplementation administered for a duration of 7 days or up to 6 months reduces the risk of death by 30% in critically ill hospitalized patients (95913). However, included studies were of low methodological quality, had high heterogeneity, assessed patients with and without vitamin D deficiency, and used variable vitamin D dose regimens and administrations methods (95913,95914).
• Fractures. Most evidence shows that oral vitamin D alone does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. Some research shows that taking vitamin D with calcium prevents fractures; however, more research is needed to determine who is most likely to benefit. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin D alone does not seem to prevent fractures in older adults. Most adults in these studies did not have osteoporosis, although osteoporosis status was unclear in some research (10140,12933,14282,38970,39015,84660,95822,97296,102145,104619)(109059,110827). However, several meta-analyses suggest that taking higher doses of vitamin D (about 800 IU daily) in combination with calcium might reduce overall fracture risk in older patients (38942,38970,39015,84660,102145,110809). One meta-analysis of clinical research in community- or long-term care-living males and females at least 65 years of age shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily in combination with calcium reduces the risk of hip and non-vertebral fractures by 25% and 20%, respectively, compared with placebo (110809). However, discrepancies exist which are possibly related to the dose and form of calcium used in combination with vitamin D and/or the patient population. Some research shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily in combination with calcium 1200 mg daily as tricalcium phosphate reduces fracture risk by up to 31% while taking vitamin D with calcium carbonate does not reduce fracture risk (12929,14282,16878,110809). Some individual clinical studies in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years show that taking vitamin D plus calcium daily for 2-7 years does not prevent fractures when compared with placebo (14282,16878). Other confounding variables include the possible additional effects of hormonal therapy when given with calcium to postmenopausal adults and/or the inclusion of institutionalized patients with unclear osteoporotic status (95822,97296). Most research shows that taking vitamin D in combination with omega-3 fatty acids does not prevent fractures. A large clinical study shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily alone or with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily and/or strength training three times weekly does not prevent fractures in adults over 70 years of age when compared with placebo (104619). Another large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily, alone or with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, over approximately 5 years does not prevent overall fractures, nonvertebral fractures, or hip fractures in adults over 50 (males) or 55 (females) years old when compared with placebo. Although the osteoporosis status of the population was unclear, findings were consistent in adults at high fracture risk based on use of osteoporosis medications and/or a history of fragility fractures (109059). As of April 2018, the US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends against supplementing with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less along with calcium 1000 mg daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal adults. The USPSTF also concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with doses of vitamin D greater than 400 IU daily along with calcium doses greater than 1000 mg daily is safe or effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture (95695). For information on patients WITH osteoporosis, refer to the Osteoporosis discussion. There is limited research available regarding the effects of vitamin D supplementation for fracture prevention in children. Preliminary research in children aged 2 to 17 years with vitamin D insufficiency and one or more previous fractures shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily with calcium 600 mg daily for 6 months modestly reduces the risk of forearm fractures over 12 months compared with children not given vitamin D or calcium (110820).
• Hypertension. Overall, vitamin D does not seem to prevent or lower high blood pressure in most patients; however, it may lower blood pressure in hypertensive patients with vitamin D deficiency. Details: Although population research has found that lower vitamin D levels are associated with a higher risk of developing hypertension, clinical research shows vitamin D supplementation does not prevent hypertension (15630). A large clinical trial in postmenopausal adults shows that taking vitamin D3 400 IU with calcium 1000 mg daily does not reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Most meta-analyses and clinical trials in patients with existing hypertension show that vitamin D supplementation does not lower blood pressure when compared with placebo, regardless of vitamin D formulation, dose, or duration of supplementation (16714,91340,96405,103657,104619,113583,113668). However, a meta-analysis of 5 clinical studies in patients with hypertension and vitamin D deficiency shows that supplementation with vitamin D reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by about 7 mmHg and 3 mmHg, respectively, when compared with placebo (100895). Another meta-analysis of 11 clinical trials in patients over 60 years of age with hypertension and vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D supplements significantly reduces systolic, but not diastolic, blood pressure when compared with placebo, especially in trials lasting more than 8 weeks where the total dose of vitamin D is above 400,000 IU (113592). An individual clinical study in patients with hypertension and vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly or 1000 IU daily reduces systolic blood pressure by about 6 mmHg and mean arterial pressure by about 4 mmHg, but does not affect diastolic blood pressure, when compared to baseline (108440).
• Prostate cancer. Oral vitamin D does not appear to affect prostate cancer progression or cancer-related mortality. Details: A meta-analysis of three clinical trials shows that vitamin D supplementation does not affect prostate cancer progression as measured by prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or mortality in patients with prostate cancer (99770).
• Psychosis. Oral vitamin D does not seem to improve symptoms in patients with a functional psychotic disorder. Details: A clinical study in adults with a functional psychotic disorder shows that taking oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 20,000 IU monthly for 6 months has no effect on total positive and negative syndrome scale score (PANSS) when compared with placebo. The majority of patients included in this study were deficient in vitamin D at baseline (107226).
• Tuberculosis. Oral vitamin D seems to be ineffective for reducing the severity of tuberculosis or mortality from tuberculosis. Limited research suggests that vitamin D may have small benefits in newly diagnosed patients receiving tuberculosis treatment for the first time. Details: Although population research has found that tuberculosis is associated with vitamin D deficiency, most clinical research shows that taking vitamin D does not improve clinical outcomes in people with tuberculosis infection. Meta-analyses and individual clinical studies show that taking vitamin D as a single 100,000 IU dose, or as 400 IU daily for 2 months, along with standard care does not improve tuberculosis severity or reduce the risk of mortality in children or adults with tuberculosis, regardless of their baseline vitamin D levels (82570,82475,98913,103655,103668,104022). However, some research has identified modest benefits in newly diagnosed patients receiving anti-tuberculosis treatment for the first time. A meta-analysis of clinical research in this population shows that taking vitamin D at a dose of 1000 IU daily or 600,000 IU monthly modestly increases the odds of sputum smear conversions by 1.2-fold, but does not improve the time to sputum smear conversions, when compared with placebo (98235). A small clinical study in treatment-naïve adults with low levels of serum vitamin D shows that taking calcitriol 0.25 mcg twice daily for up to 6 months, starting with anti-tuberculosis treatment initiation, decreases the time to sputum smear conversion and 50% lesion absorption by about 3 days when compared with not taking vitamin D (109045). Additionally, a small clinical study in children aged 6-18 years with vitamin D insufficiency receiving standard treatment for newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis shows that taking vitamin D 1000 IU daily reduces the duration of fever and cough by 1 and 2 weeks, respectively, when compared with placebo (108437).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for acne. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with acne and vitamin D deficiency shows that taking cholecalciferol 1,000 IU daily for 2 months reduces the number of inflammatory lesions by about 35%, compared with 6% in those taking placebo. There was no effect on the total or non-inflammatory lesion count (106127). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking alfacalcidol (One Alpha, LEO Company, Denmark) 0.25 mcg daily for 3 months modestly improves acne severity when compared with taking placebo (106128). In addition, population research has found that individuals with acne have modestly lower vitamin D levels than healthy controls. The odds of vitamin D deficiency were approximately three times higher in patients with acne when compared with healthy controls (106105).
• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral cholecalciferol is beneficial for preventing age-related cognitive decline. Details: Pooled results of two large clinical sub-studies in community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older show that taking cholecalciferol 2000 IU daily for 2-3 years has no effect on cognitive decline when compared with placebo. A subgroup analysis in Black patients suggests a modest effect of vitamin D when compared with placebo (108428).
• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for this condition. Details: Some population research has found that lower serum concentrations of vitamin D are associated with higher risk of Alzheimer disease, and also with decreased cognition. People with Alzheimer disease seem to have serum concentrations of vitamin D that are about 2.5 ng/mL lower than patients without Alzheimer disease (84672,103666). However, other population research has found that vitamin D deficiency (<25 nmol/L) or insufficiency (25-50 nmol/L) is not associated with increased risk of Alzheimer disease (100899).
• Asthma. Oral vitamin D might reduce asthma exacerbations in adults and children with mild, but not severe or persistent, asthma. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy or the first 6 months of an infant's life does not seem to prevent the development of asthma later in infancy or childhood. Details: Population research in patients with asthma suggests that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk of exacerbations and increased need for medication therapy (94693). However, findings from clinical research are mixed. Some meta-analyses of clinical trials in adults and children with asthma show that taking vitamin D for 3 months to 1 year reduces the rate of asthma exacerbations by 31% to 38% when compared with control (92690,94686,115584). However, other meta-analyses show that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of asthma exacerbations when compared with placebo (109728,109732,110833). The reasons for this discrepancy are not clear. However, some clinical research suggests that vitamin D supplements might only prevent asthma in people with non-persistent asthma (92690,94685,94686,94688,104020). Also, many studies are small and do not represent patients with severe asthma exacerbations (92690,94687). Baseline levels of vitamin D may play a role. A clinical study in children aged 6-16 years with persistent asthma and low vitamin D levels shows that taking vitamin D 4000 IU daily for 48 weeks does not reduce severe asthma exacerbations when compared with placebo (104020). However, a meta-analysis including this study shows that taking vitamin D does reduce risk of asthma exacerbations in children with low baseline vitamin D levels (109728). Additionally, two meta-analyses show that taking vitamin D seems to modestly improve pulmonary function when compared with placebo (109732,115584). Vitamin D doses have varied, with oral doses of 200-4000 IU daily, 1000-14,000 IU once weekly, 60,000 IU once monthly, 120,000 IU every 2 months, 100,000 IU 14 days apart, or 100,000 to 600,000 IU as a bolus dose followed by 400-4000 IU daily (92690,94686,104020,109728,110833,115584). Vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of asthma in infants has also been evaluated. A meta-analysis of 4 large clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D 400-1200 IU daily for the first 6 months of life does not reduce the risk of asthma or wheezing at 6-30 months of age when compared with control (112031). Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy has also been evaluated (97306,99763,102146,112031). A meta-analysis of 3 large clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D 2800-4400 IU daily during the 2^nd and 3^rd trimesters of pregnancy reduces the risk of recurrent wheezing by 23% but does not reduce the risk of asthma diagnosis within the first 3-6 years of life when compared with vitamin D 400 IU daily (112031). Some research suggests that the dose of vitamin D plays a role. A meta-analysis shows that prenatal vitamin D 800 IU daily reduces the odds of wheeze or asthma by 32%, while lower or higher vitamin D doses were not beneficial (103661).
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for athletic performance. Details: One small clinical trial in athletes shows that taking vitamin D 20,000 or 40,000 IU once weekly for 2 doses does not affect performance on vertical jumps, sprints, or leg and bench presses when compared with placebo (98188). Another small clinical trial in professional rugby players shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 50,000 IU once every two weeks over 12 weeks does not improve sprinting speed or the ability to perform bench presses, bench pulls, and chin-ups when compared with placebo (98189). Also, most research shows that taking vitamin D does not improve measures of cardiorespiratory fitness. One small study in young males undergoing resistance training shows that taking vitamin D 8000 IU daily for 12 weeks does not improve cardiorespiratory fitness compared with taking placebo (110812).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Most research shows that oral vitamin D reduces eczema severity in children. However, most research shows that oral vitamin D, taken during pregnancy or infancy, does not prevent eczema in the child. Details: A meta-analysis of eight moderate-quality clinical trials in children shows that taking vitamin D, most commonly 1000-2000 IU daily for 4-12 weeks, modestly reduces severity of eczema when compared with placebo (109728). Most of the children in these studies were also given conventional medications. Oral vitamin D has also been evaluated for eczema prevention. A meta-analysis of two clinical studies shows that consuming vitamin D 2800-4400 IU daily during the 2^nd and 3^rd trimesters of pregnancy is not associated with a reduced risk for eczema in children during the first 3 years of life when compared with vitamin D 400 IU daily (97306). Another meta-analysis of five large clinical studies shows that prenatal or infant vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of developing eczema when compared with low-dose vitamin D, placebo, or no intervention (108438).
• Atrial fibrillation. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing atrial fibrillation. Details: A large clinical trial in adults without cardiovascular disease shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for an average of 5 years does not reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation when compared with placebo or fish oil 840 mg daily (105209). However, observational research in postmenopausal adults with osteoporosis found that vitamin D supplementation is associated with a lower occurrence of atrial fibrillation when compared with not taking vitamin D (98922). Also, one large observational study in vitamin D-deficient patients with no history of atrial fibrillation has found that vitamin D supplementation for at least 6 months is associated with up to a 16% decreased risk of atrial fibrillation when compared with not taking vitamin D. There were also modest improvements in atrial fibrillation-free survival. In males 65 years and older with hypertension or diabetes at baseline, blood levels of at least 30 ng/mL following vitamin D supplementation were associated with decreased risk of atrial fibrillation; a post-supplementation blood level of 21-29 ng/mL was not associated with decreased risk (109043).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for ADHD. Details: A small clinical trial in children 5-12 years of age with ADHD and vitamin D insufficiency shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily along with methylphenidate for 8 weeks seems to improve parental ratings of evening, but not morning or overall, symptoms of inattentiveness and impulsivity when compared with methylphenidate alone. Vitamin D insufficiency was defined as levels less than 30 ng/mL (98196). Based on these and other preliminary findings, Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that vitamin D in doses of 1500 to 4000 IU daily is weakly recommended for adjunctive use in children with ADHD, especially those with insufficient intake or skin exposure to sunlight (110318).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for autism spectrum disorder. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 2.5-8 years with autism spectrum disorder shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 12 months modestly reduces irritability and hyperactivity when compared with placebo (99767).
• Autoimmune thyroiditis. It is unclear of oral vitamin D improves outcomes in patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Details: A meta-analysis of 12 clinical trials in patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis shows that taking vitamin D for at least 12 weeks increases free triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) levels, and reduces levels of thyroid stimulating hormone, thyroglobulin antibody, and anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody, when compared with placebo or no treatment (113593).
• Back pain. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for reducing chronic low back pain. Details: A meta-analysis of 10 clinical studies in adults with chronic low back pain shows that taking vitamin D does not reduce pain scores when compared with placebo, regardless of baseline vitamin D status or duration of supplementation. Oral vitamin D dosages used in these studies included 400-4000 IU daily for 1-6 months, 50,000 IU once weekly for 8 weeks, or 150,000-300,000 IU as a single dose. Intramuscular dosages ranged from 150,000-300,00 IU as a single dose (115588).
• Bacterial vaginosis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for bacterial vaginosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in females at high risk for sexually transmitted disease shows that taking vitamin D along with standard therapy for bacterial vaginosis does not reduce the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis when compared with placebo. Patients in this study had been treated with metronidazole 500 mg orally twice daily for 7 days along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 50,000 IU each week for 4 weeks and then every 4 weeks for the remaining 20 weeks (91348).
• Bariatric surgery complications. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation after bariatric surgery attenuates any bone health-related complications. Details: Clinical research in adults who had undergone bariatric surgery shows that vitamin D supplementation in doses of 800-7900 IU daily improves vitamin D status when compared with placebo. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation in these doses for 1 year improves parathyroid hormone levels or bone mineral density or reduces fracture risk (115589).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention of breast cancer. Details: Some population research evaluating intake of calcium plus vitamin D suggests that higher vitamin D intake is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer in premenopausal or postmenopausal adults (15631). Similarly, a large observational study in females with a biological sibling with breast cancer has found that taking vitamin D recently or prior to enrollment is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer when compared with nonrecent vitamin D use or never taking vitamin D, respectively (107215). However, other research found that higher vitamin D intake is associated with a 17% reduced risk of breast cancer in premenopausal and perimenopausal, but not postmenopausal, adults (39001). Observational research has also examined the association between blood levels of vitamin D and risk of developing breast cancer. A meta-analysis found that those with serum levels of about 52 ng/mL had a 50% lower risk of developing breast cancer when compared with those with serum levels of less than 13 ng/mL. This high serum level of vitamin D corresponds to a high dose of about 4000 IU daily (16049). Other observational research has found that baseline vitamin D levels of more than 20 ng/mL are associated with a 48% reduced risk of developing breast cancer over approximately 9 years in Latina females in the US when compared with levels below 20 ng/mL; however, this association was not present in Black females (109058). Despite the contradictory findings from observational research, results from clinical research are generally negative. Evidence from one large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative) shows that postmenopausal adults who take vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years do not have a significantly reduced risk of developing breast cancer (16715,98895). Also, a meta-analysis of two large-scale clinical trials, which did not include the Women's Health Initiative trial, shows that taking vitamin D 800-1000 IU daily, alone or with calcium, for 3-4 years does not reduce the incidence of breast cancer in postmenopausal adults, although there was a trend towards reduced risk with higher doses of vitamin D supplementation (97301). While vitamin D and calcium supplementation during the intervention period of the Women's Health Initiative trial was not associated with a reduced risk of developing breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a precursor to breast cancer, a secondary post-hoc analysis of the data shows that supplementation reduces the risk of developing DCIS by 18% over a median follow-up of 19 years (107216). Additional research is needed regarding an optimal dose of vitamin D, timing of initiation, and whether any benefit is affected by menopausal status.
• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Limited research suggests that vitamin D deficiency is linked with bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the infant. Details: Observational research has found that vitamin D deficiency at birth is associated with about a 2-fold increased odds of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (104021). However, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial.
• Cancer. Vitamin D does not seem to reduce overall cancer risk. However, some research shows that vitamin D might slightly reduce the risk of metastatic cancer and cancer-related mortality. Details: There is interest in vitamin D for cancer PREVENTION, as observational research suggests that higher vitamin D intake and higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with a lower risk of cancer (111150). While individual clinical trials evaluating vitamin D for cancer have produced inconsistent findings, most meta-analyses and clinical trials show that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) alone or with calcium does not significantly reduce the risk of developing cancer (15629,91344,93943,97296,98916,104024,104618,110811). However, vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of metastatic cancer and cancer-related mortality. A large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D3 2000 IU daily for a median of 5.3 years slightly reduces the risk of advanced metastatic or fatal cancers when compared with placebo (104618). Additionally, meta-analyses of several large clinical trials show that taking vitamin D 400-4000 IU daily, with or without calcium, for 1-7 years reduces the risk of cancer-related mortality by 12-13% when compared with control, while intermittent bolus dosing of vitamin D at high doses for 1-5 years does not appear to reduce the risk of cancer-related mortality (104024,111149). The role of vitamin D in cancer TREATMENT is unclear. A meta-analysis of clinical and observational research suggests that supplementation of vitamin D after a cancer diagnosis is associated with a modest improvement in overall survival, but not progression-free or cancer-specific survival (109726). Doses used in clinical research ranged between 1200 IU and 8000 IU daily or 100,000 IU every 50 days, after surgery and/or during treatment (99195,99196,109726). Other clinical research in patients with luminal gastrointestinal cancers shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily does not reduce the risk of relapse when compared with placebo (99195). It is unclear which, if any, types or stages of cancer respond best to vitamin D, and what dose of vitamin D is optimal.
• Child growth. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for improving infant growth or bone structure. Details: Meta-analyses and individual clinical trials show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy modestly increases length at birth and bone mineral density at up to 7 years of age when compared with control, usually placebo or vitamin D 400 IU daily. However, there was no effect on length in the infant up to one year of age, weight at birth or up to one year of age, head circumference at birth or up to 6 years of age, bone mineral content at up to 6 years of age, or neonatal bone mineral density, bone mineral content, bone area, or femur or humoral length (98198,109737,112028,115585). In the available research, vitamin D was taken in doses of 200 IU to 4400 IU daily, 4200 IU to 50,000 IU weekly, 50,000 IU every 2 weeks, or 60,000 IU every 4-8 weeks, starting from the early to late stages of pregnancy and usually continued until birth (98198,109737,115585).
• Chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with CKD. Most research suggests that it does not reduce the risk for adverse cardiovascular events. Details: Population research in patients on dialysis has found that vitamin D levels less than 17.8 ng/mL are associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with higher levels (16619). A meta-analysis and individual clinical studies show that vitamin D and vitamin D analogues decrease parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels and urine protein levels in people with CKD (84376,84377,84628,98233,98236). However, taking vitamin D does not appear to decrease the risk of death or parathyroidectomy in CKD patients (84376,84377). Also, taking vitamin D increases the risk for hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia in this patient population (84376,84377,98236). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the prevention of cardiovascular events in adults with CKD. Observational research has found that vitamin D deficiency in patients with CKD is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. However, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to be beneficial. One clinical study shows that taking paricalcitol, an active form of vitamin D, titrated to maintain adequate serum calcium levels, for 48 weeks does not affect the size of the left ventricle or heart function when compared with placebo (98233). Other clinical research in Japanese patients on hemodialysis for CKD shows that adding alfacalcidol, another active form of vitamin D, 0.5 mcg daily to standard treatment for 4 years does not affect mortality or cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarctions, stroke, aortic dissection, and others compared to standard treatment only (98920). Also, a large clinical trial in patients with CKD shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol 2000 IU daily, alone or with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, does not affect major cardiovascular events or invasive cancer when compared with placebo (110811). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for musculoskeletal health in adults with CKD. A small clinical study shows that taking cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily, with or without physical activity, for 3 months improves bicep strength, but not back flexibility or aerobic fitness capacity, when compared with baseline. In patients taking cholecalciferol in combination with physical activity, musculoskeletal health was similar when compared with cholecalciferol alone (108431). However, this study was inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups, and it is unclear if the improvement from baseline differed between groups. Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the improvement of iron status in adults with CKD and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Clinical research shows that taking Vitamin D as cholecalciferol (Vitamin D3 Forte Renapharma) 8000 IU daily for 12 weeks does not improve iron status compared with taking placebo. However, a sub-analysis shows that hemoglobin levels are modestly improved in patients with a low Vitamin D status at baseline suggesting that Vitamin D might improve iron availability in these patients (110819).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for COPD; benefits may be limited to patients with severe vitamin D deficiency. Details: Population research has found an association between low vitamin D levels and reduced lung function, increased risk of developing COPD, and worsening COPD severity (17685,96401). However, 3 meta-analyses of clinical research in adults with COPD show that, overall, oral vitamin D does not have beneficial effects on mortality, rate of COPD exacerbations, pulmonary function, or most measures of symptom severity when compared with placebo (109732,112485,115586). A subgroup analysis suggests that any benefits of vitamin D supplementation may be limited to patients with severe vitamin D deficiency (25-hydroxyvitamin D levels below 25 nmol/L) at baseline (115586).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for cognitive function. Details: Population research has found that low vitamin D levels are associated with worse cognitive performance and cognitive decline when compared to high vitamin D levels in healthy adults (84672,95916). However, the effect of vitamin D supplementation on cognitive function is unclear. One small meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation does not improve cognitive function (95916). However, the included trials evaluated a widely heterogeneous study population and utilized variable measures of cognitive function.
• Cognitive impairment. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Details: A small clinical study in older adults with mild cognitive impairment shows that taking vitamin D3 10,000 IU three times weekly for 20 weeks in addition to exercise and cognitive training does not improve cognitive function when compared with placebo and exercise with or without cognitive training. However, most participants had sufficient serum vitamin D levels at baseline (112489).
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of colorectal cancer. Details: Epidemiological research has found that a higher serum vitamin D level is associated with decreased risk of mortality and increased survival in patients with colorectal cancer (16101,99196). However, it is unclear whether vitamin D supplementation improves survival in patients with colorectal cancer, as research has generally involved small populations and results are somewhat conflicting. A subgroup analysis of one clinical study shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily does not reduce the risk of relapse or death, death due to any cause, or relapse over 5 years when compared with placebo in patients with colorectal cancer (99195). However, this subgroup may have been underpowered to detect between-group differences. Another small clinical trial in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer shows that taking high-dose vitamin D 8000 IU daily during the first cycle of chemotherapy, and then 4000 IU daily for subsequent cycles, does not increase median progression-free survival when compared with taking vitamin D 400 IU daily. However, patients taking high-dose vitamin D were 36% less likely to experience disease progression or death during follow-up when compared with patients taking the lower dose of vitamin D (99196). This latter result suggests that high-dose vitamin D supplementation might be beneficial for patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, but larger, multicenter studies are needed to confirm. The role of vitamin D in colorectal cancer prevention has also been investigated. A meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that a higher serum vitamin D level is associated with a decreased colorectal cancer risk; however, sub-analyses suggest that this association only occurs in females, not males (109740). Most studies have evaluated vitamin D supplements in combination with calcium; the effects of vitamin D supplementation alone are unclear. One meta-analysis of clinical research suggests that taking vitamin D plus calcium is not associated with a decreased incidence of colorectal cancer in people with a low baseline risk of colorectal cancer (39042). Another meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation, with or without calcium, does not reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer or colorectal adenomas (109730). Additionally, a large clinical trial suggests that postmenopausal adults who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290,98895). One clinical study shows that taking calcium supplements reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas, but not in people with lower than average vitamin D levels (12118).
• Crohn disease. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D reduces relapses in patients with Crohn disease. Details: A meta-analysis of small, low-quality clinical studies in patients with IBD, including Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, shows that taking high- or low-dose vitamin D for up to 1 year reduces the rate of relapse when compared with control (98915). The validity of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies.
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for dementia. Details: Population research has found that patients with any type of dementia have serum concentrations of vitamin D that are about 2.5 ng/mL lower than patients without dementia (84672). However, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for treating depression. Vitamin D does not seem to prevent the development of depression. Details: The role of vitamin D in the treatment of depression is unclear. Earlier meta-analyses of clinical research show that vitamin D supplementation does not improve overall symptoms of depression. However, some subgroup analyses suggest that vitamin D may be beneficial for improving the symptoms of depression in people with clinically significant symptoms, as well as those with baseline vitamin D deficiency (97295,97298). More recent meta-analyses of several clinical trials, that include some of the same studies, show that vitamin D modestly improves symptoms of depression in adults; however, subgroup analysis suggests that vitamin D does not improve depressive symptoms in older adults (110832,112786). These analyses are mixed over whether baseline vitamin D status affects results (110832,112786) and one of these analyses shows no evidence that the type of depression affects findings (110832). Another meta-analysis of generally small clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes and depression shows that taking vitamin D modestly improves depressive symptoms when compared with placebo or no intervention (110814). Although, results of an individual clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes are in contrast (108423). The evaluated research implemented one-time doses of 150,000-500,000 IU, as well as daily and weekly doses ranging between 400-5000 IU daily or 5000-100,000 IU weekly for 6 weeks to 2 years, with the most evidence of benefit related to one-time high doses. Cholecalciferol was the most common form of vitamin D used (97295,97298,108423,110814,110832,112786). Significant heterogeneity between studies and the wide variability in dosing strategies limit the validity of these findings, as well as identification of an effective dose or target population. Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the prevention of depression. One large clinical study (VITAL-DEP) in healthy patients 50 years and older shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for about 5.3 years does not prevent depression or depressive symptoms, or improve mood, when compared with placebo (103670). An analysis of a cohort of patients from the VITAL-DEP trial also shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 2 years does not reduce the risk of major depressive disorder or improve mood scores in patients with subthreshold depression or risk factors for late-life depression when compared with placebo (112032). In addition, a meta-analysis of several clinical studies suggests that vitamin D supplementation does not prevent depression based on subgroup analysis of patients without depression at baseline (112786). Based on these and other preliminary findings, Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that vitamin D in doses of 1500 to 4000 IU daily is weakly recommended for adjunctive or monotherapy use in patients with depression, especially those with insufficient intake or skin exposure to sunlight (110318).
• Diabetes. Oral vitamin D might improve glycemic indices in some patients with type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes. It is unclear if oral or intramuscular vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention of type 1 or gestational diabetes. Details: Most meta-analyses of mainly small clinical trials show that vitamin D supplementation is beneficial for measures of glycemic control in adults with diabetes. However, the best evidence of benefit is in people with baseline vitamin D deficiency. Five meta-analyses of clinical studies in patients with type 2 diabetes show that vitamin D supplementation reduces glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.2% to 0.3%, and improves serum insulin, fasting blood glucose, and measures of insulin resistance when compared with control (96403,110822,112487,115581,115583). Supplemental vitamin D seems to be most beneficial in patients with baseline vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency (96403,107210,110822,112487,115581). Furthermore, correlation analysis suggests an inverse relationship between serum vitamin D levels and serum insulin, fasting blood glucose, and measures of insulin resistance (112487). In most clinical studies vitamin D supplementation ranged from 1000-6000 IU daily, 20,000-60,000 IU weekly, or 100,000-400,000 IU once over 8-48 weeks (96403,107210,110822,115581,115583). Most analyses exhibited significant heterogeneity related to vitamin D dosing regimen, geographic location, and patient population. However, one meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with diabetes shows that vitamin D improves HbA1c, insulin resistance, and insulin measures in studies lasting less than 6 months, but not in studies lasting longer than 6 months (99764). An additional meta-analysis suggests that most evidence of benefit is associated with doses of more than 2000 IU daily for 4-12 weeks (110822). Another meta-analysis suggests that benefits may be greater in adults with less severe obesity and a shorter duration of type 2 diabetes (115583). Vitamin D has been evaluated for the prevention of type 1 diabetes. There is preliminary evidence that daily vitamin D supplementation (form not specified) in infants during the first year of life is associated with a reduced incidence of type 1 diabetes development later in life (10139). Also, a meta-analysis of population studies has found that vitamin D supplementation in early childhood is associated with a 29% reduced risk of developing type 1 diabetes later in life (84225). Vitamin D has been evaluated in adults with gestational diabetes, yielding conflicting findings. One clinical trial shows that oral vitamin D 50,000 IU every 4 weeks modestly reduces levels of insulin, as well as measures of insulin resistance, with no effect on fasting blood glucose (106125), whereas other clinical research shows that this same dosing regimen modestly reduces levels of fasting blood glucose and HbA1c, with no effect on insulin measures (106126). A separate clinical study shows that taking oral vitamin D 500 IU twice daily in yogurt modestly improves all measures of glycemic indices (101775). Additionally, a large clinical trial shows that taking oral vitamin D 1600 IU daily modestly reduces fasting blood glucose when compared with vitamin D 400 IU daily (112020). Some clinical research also shows that oral vitamin D modestly improves levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides when compared with control (106125,110823), although not all research agrees (106126). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking oral vitamin D reduces the risk of premature birth and neonatal hospitalization by approximately 63% and 62%, respectively (110823). A meta-analysis of 5 small clinical studies shows that taking oral vitamin D 400-1000 IU daily for 6 weeks or 50,000 IU twice over 6 weeks along with calcium decreases fasting plasma glucose and serum insulin when compared with placebo (115579). One small clinical study shows that giving vitamin D 300,000 IU as a single intramuscular injection at 24-28 weeks' gestation does not affect HbA1c (106124). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the prevention of gestational diabetes. A Cochrane analysis of one large clinical study shows that taking vitamin D during pregnancy does not lower the risk of gestational diabetes when compared with no supplementation (114587). In addition, a meta-analysis of population studies suggests that there is a U-shaped association between serum vitamin D levels and the risk of developing gestational diabetes, with 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels of 40-90 nmol/L associated with the lowest risk (106109). A meta-analysis of clinical research in adults with insulin resistance during pregnancy, but not gestational diabetes, shows that taking vitamin D at varying doses for 6-26 weeks modestly decreases measures of insulin resistance when compared with placebo (110821). However, this study did not evaluate whether vitamin D prevented the development of gestational diabetes in these patients. Vitamin D has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. One study evaluated vitamin D in combination with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 360 mg plus docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 240 mg twice daily, suggesting that this combination improves glycemic markers when compared with taking vitamin D alone (106122). Other clinical research in patients with gestational diabetes shows that taking vitamin D with omega-3 fatty acids 8,000 mg twice daily for 6 weeks modestly improves glycemic indices when compared with placebo (106114). However, it is unclear if these effects are due to vitamin D, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Diabetic foot ulcers. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for diabetic foot ulcers. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with diabetic foot ulcers shows that taking vitamin D modestly reduces ulcer size and improves glycemic and lipid indices when compared with placebo (110835). This meta-analysis is limited by the availability of three small clinical trials, as well as the heterogeneous doses of vitamin D in the included studies.
• Diabetic nephropathy. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D improves some markers of kidney function in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in patients with diabetic nephropathy shows that taking vitamin D or its analogs reduces inflammatory markers and protein in the urine, but does not affect measures of kidney function such as serum creatinine or glomerular filtration rate, when compared to control (99771).
• Diabetic retinopathy. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in diabetic retinopathy. Details: There is weak evidence from observational research suggesting a link between vitamin D deficiency and diabetic retinopathy (112095). However, clinical research addressing the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation for treatment or prevention of diabetic retinopathy is lacking.
• Dysmenorrhea. Limited evidence suggests that oral vitamin D reduces pain in patients with dysmenorrhea. Details: A meta-analysis of 9 small clinical studies in patients with dysmenorrhea shows that taking vitamin D in doses ranging from 5000 IU daily to 300,000 IU monthly modestly reduces pain when compared with control (112029). However, the validity of these findings is limited by a high degree of heterogeneity across the studies, including differences in blinding and control interventions, vitamin D doses and frequency of supplementation, and baseline vitamin D levels. Another small clinical study in adolescent patients with dysmenorrhea shows that taking vitamin D3 50,000 IU weekly for 9 weeks modestly reduces pain when compared to baseline (98912). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for ED. Details: Although some data suggest ED is associated with low serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D levels, preliminary research in males aged 60-84 years shows that taking vitamin D 60,000 IU once monthly for up to 5 years does not prevent or improve ED when compared with placebo (113580).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. Small studies suggest that vitamin D does not improve exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 small studies shows that taking vitamin D before and/or during exercise does not improve circulating levels of creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, or myoglobin when compared with placebo (107218).
• Fall prevention. The role of vitamin D in fall prevention is confusing and controversial. Most clinical research shows that taking vitamin D 800-1000 IU daily decreases the risk of falls, with effects most apparent with daily over intermittent dosing and in those with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency. Taking vitamin D at doses higher or lower than this may be associated with increased risk of falls. Details: Higher serum levels of vitamin D have been associated with improved lower-extremity function in elderly adults (15636). Clinical research in older adults shows that taking vitamin D or vitamin D analogues, with or without calcium, reduces the number of people who have a fall by up to 19% (39038,84215,84374,84539,94130,104023,113595,114504). Other research shows that vitamin D, with or without calcium, reduces number of falls by 19% to 50% (11939,16275,84404,93941,109053). The beneficial effect does not appear to depend on the form of vitamin D used (ergocalciferol, cholecalciferol, calcitriol, or alfacalcidol) (39038,84374,113595). Multiple meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking vitamin D leads to a decreased rate of falls in patients with low baseline levels of vitamin D, but not in those with adequate vitamin D levels (84670,84684,109053,114504). One meta-analysis also suggests that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol up to 1000 IU daily reduces fall risk by up to 19%, whereas higher doses do not reduce fall risk (109053). Also, daily dosing, but not intermittent dosing, seems to be associated with a reduced risk of falling (109053,114504). Similarly, another meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin D 800-1000 IU daily, with or without calcium, lowers the risk of falls by about 15-26% when compared with placebo, no treatment, or calcium alone. However, taking vitamin D 500 IU or less daily and vitamin D 1100 IU or more daily, with or without calcium, is not associated with a lower risk of falls and may even increase the risk of falls by 22-44% (114504). Despite the above meta-analyses, other clinical research shows that vitamin D does not reduce the risk of falling (84404,84670), the rate of falls overall (84670,93942), or the rate of injurious falls (93942) in elderly patients (93942). One study in adults over 70 years of age with a history of falling found that taking high-dose vitamin D, either as 60,000 IU monthly or 24,000 IU plus calcifediol 300 mcg monthly, increased both the risk of falling and the mean number of falls compared to a lower dose of 24,000 IU monthly (93940). One meta-analysis of 20 trials including nearly 30,000 patients shows that taking vitamin D, with or without calcium, does not reduce the risk of falling in elderly patients, regardless of baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D achieved with treatment, duration of treatment, or residential status of the patients (91342). While a meta-analysis of 10 trials in nearly 6,000 patients shows that taking vitamin D 700-1000 IU daily with calcium 1000-2000 mg daily reduces the risk of falling in the elderly by 12% when compared with placebo or no treatment, a meta-analysis of 21 trials in nearly 52,000 patients shows that vitamin D alone is only associated with a reduced risk of falls in patients with baseline vitamin D levels of less than 50 nmol/L when compared with placebo or no treatment (107224). The 2018 US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for fall prevention acknowledges this research by recommending AGAINST vitamin D supplementation for fall prevention in community dwelling adults 65 years of age and older who do not have osteoporosis or vitamin D deficiency (95703). The reasons for the disparate study results may have to do with the way in which clinical trials have reported outcomes. Clinical trials assessing the effect of vitamin D on fall risk may report results as the number of patients who experience one or more falls, the total number of falls, or the rate of falls per individual. This can affect ultimate conclusions and, in some cases, can be misleading. For example, when studies report on only the total number of falls, it is unclear if vitamin D reduces the rate of falls across the study population, or if it only reduces falls in a small subset of patients. Also, analyses of research suggest that the size of the clinical study appears to affect the trial results. Most trials showing significant reductions in fall risk have been small and of short duration (91342,94132); whereas larger and longer-term studies tend to show no benefit (13073,84399).
• Fetal and premature infant mortality. Taking vitamin D during pregnancy might reduce the risk of fetal or early infant death. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy reduces the risk of intrauterine or neonatal death by 31% when compared with not supplementing with vitamin D. A sub-analysis shows that this benefit was limited to doses of up to 4000 IU daily (109055). However, a Cochrane review suggests that the evidence linking vitamin D supplementation to a lower risk of fetal or neonatal death is very uncertain (114587). Clinical practice guidelines from the Endocrine Society conditionally recommend, based on low certainty of evidence, empiric vitamin D supplementation from fortified foods, vitamin D supplements, or prenatal vitamin formulations that contain vitamin D during pregnancy to potentially lower the risk of intra-uterine and neonatal mortality, preeclampsia, preterm birth, and small for gestational age (SGA) birth. Empiric vitamin D supplementation is defined as supplementing with vitamin D above the Recommended Dietary Allowance without having tested serum vitamin D status (114502).
• Fibromyalgia. A small clinical study suggests that vitamin D might improve pain in patients with fibromyalgia. Details: A small clinical study in fibromyalgia patients with low vitamin D levels shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1200-2400 IU daily seems to reduce pain, but not mood or quality of life, when compared with placebo (91349).
• Food allergies. It is unclear if prenatal or infant oral vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of developing food allergies. Details: A meta-analysis of two large clinical studies shows that prenatal or infant vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of developing food allergies when compared with low-dose vitamin D or no intervention (108438).
• Frailty. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of frailty in older adults. Details: Frailty involves a combination of muscle loss and weakness, with exhaustion and reduced ability for physical activity. Some observational research has found that low vitamin D status is associated with frailty occurrence. However, clinical research in community dwelling older adults shows that taking vitamin D as 1000 IU, 2000 IU, or 4000 IU daily for 24 months does not prevent frailty or attenuate the worsening of frailty when compared with low-dose vitamin D 200 IU daily. Baseline vitamin D status did not affect these findings. Also, a sub-analysis suggests that vitamin D 2000 IU might increase frailty; however, only a small number of participants were randomized to this dose (109046). Other clinical research in community dwelling adults at least 70 years of age shows that taking cholecalciferol 2000 IU daily for 3 years does not reduce the odds of becoming pre-frail or frail over 36 months when compared with placebo. However, when taken in combination with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily and a home exercise program, the odds of becoming pre-frail is reduced by 39% (110829).
• Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). A small clinical study suggests that vitamin D may modestly improve anxiety in patients with GAD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with GAD shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU once weekly for 3 months, in addition to taking an antidepressant and an anxiolytic, moderately reduces anxiety scores when compared with taking these medications alone (103654).
• Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for improving outcomes in patients receiving HSCT. Details: A small clinical study in patients who have undergone an autologous HSCT shows that taking calcitriol 0.25 mcg three times daily for 30 days can reduce the time to absolute lymphocyte count recovery, but does not affect time to recovery of absolute neutrophil and platelet counts, when compared with placebo (103665).
• Hepatitis C. Low levels of vitamin D have been associated with an inadequate response to hepatitis C therapy. Adding vitamin D to standard therapy for hepatitis C may improve viral response, especially in specific genotypes. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with hepatitis C genotypes 2-3 receiving standard therapy with PEG-interferon and ribavirin shows that adding vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 24 weeks results in 95% of patients achieving undetectable levels of hepatitis C RNA, compared to only 77% of patients treated with standard therapy alone (98917). Another small clinical study in patients with hepatitis C genotype 1b receiving the same standard therapy shows that adding vitamin D 1000 IU daily for 16 weeks results in about 79% of patients achieving undetectable levels of hepatitis C RNA, compared to about 55% of patients treated with standard therapy alone. The TT genotype seems to be especially susceptible to vitamin D supplementation, while TG/GG genotype does not seem to be susceptible (98923).
• HIV/AIDS. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for improving bone mineral density (BMD) in children and young adults with HIV. Details: Vitamin D deficiency and hyperparathyroidism are common in children and young adults with HIV. A meta-analysis of two clinical trials in this population shows that taking cholecalciferol for 12 months does not improve spine BMD when compared with placebo. Also, an analysis of two clinical trials shows that taking doses of 1600 IU to 4000 IU daily does not improve spine BMD when compared with taking doses of 400-800 IU daily. However, taking higher dose vitamin D has a small beneficial effect on total BMD when compared with taking lower doses. There was no improvement on parathyroid hormone levels (110824). This meta-analysis is limited by the availability of small clinical trials, as well as the heterogeneous doses of vitamin D used in the included studies.
• Hyperlipidemia. Although population research has found that higher vitamin D levels are associated with improved lipid levels, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial. Clinical research results are conflicting. Details: Population research has found that higher vitamin D levels are associated with lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels and higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels when compared with lower vitamin D levels (15630,98919). However, supplementation might not be beneficial. A meta-analysis of small clinical studies suggests that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol, ergocalciferol, alfacalcidol, or calcitriol slightly increases LDL cholesterol, but does not affect total cholesterol, triglycerides, or HDL cholesterol, when compared with placebo (84642). The validity of these findings is limited by the variability in patient populations, vitamin D dose and formulation, and study duration. Also, none of the included studies were prospectively designed to test the effect of vitamin D on lipid levels. Another meta-analysis of clinical studies in a mixed population of healthy adults and adults with metabolic disease shows that taking vitamin D 1400-50,000 IU weekly with calcium 500-2000 mg daily results in very modest improvements in total cholesterol, triglyceride, and HDL cholesterol levels, but not LDL or very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that effects are more pronounced in people with metabolic disease (107227). The validity of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies, which persisted throughout subgroup analyses.
• Hyperthyroidism. Oral vitamin D has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Observational research suggests that serum vitamin D levels are decreased in patients with newly diagnosed Graves' disease. A small preliminary clinical trial in patients with newly diagnosed Graves' disease taking methimazole and low levels of selenium and vitamin D shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol for 270 days, in combination with selenium for the first 180 days, modestly reduces levels of serum free thyroxine and improves quality of life when compared with no vitamin D or selenium. However, taking vitamin D and selenium did not affect levels of free triiodothyronine or positive thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor antibody (109049).
• Hypothyroidism. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in the treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with vitamin D deficiency and subclinical hypothyroidism shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 2-12 weeks decreases mean thyroid stimulating hormone levels by about 20% when compared with placebo, or by 3.55 mIU/L when compared to baseline (107213,113589).
• Ichthyosis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with inherited ichthyosis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with congenital non-syndromic ichthyosis shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 24 weeks reduces the clinical severity of disease at 12 weeks, but not 24 weeks, when compared with baseline. When compared with patients taking acitretin 0.5 mg/kg daily, results were similar at both 12 and 24 weeks, but it is unclear if the improvement from baseline differed between groups (108441).
• IgA vasculitis. It is unclear if oral alfacalcidol is beneficial in children with IgA vasculitis. Details: A clinical study in children with IgA vasculitis shows that taking alfacalcidol 0.25 mcg daily along with vitamin C, rutin, dipyridamole, cimetidine, calcium, and glucocorticoids for 4 weeks improves rates of recurrence and incidence of kidney damage when compared with those receiving the same regimen without alfacalcidol. Alfacalcidol also improves cellular immune function and reduces levels of inflammatory biomarkers (107212).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for IBS; the available research is conflicting. Details: Although some meta-analyses show that taking vitamin D is moderately more effective than placebo for improving IBS symptom severity and quality of life, other analyses disagree. Doses of vitamin D have included 50,000 IU weekly or every 2 weeks or 2000-4000 IU daily for up to 6 months (109041,109054,109057). The reasons for these discrepancies might be attributed to the inclusion criteria related to the individual trials, the small sample sizes, and varied dosing strategies used in the available research.
• Kidney transplant. It is unclear if oral cholecalciferol is beneficial for improving allograft function or preventing non-skeletal complications in kidney transplant recipients. Details: Following a kidney transplant, patients are at increased risk of vitamin D insufficiency and related outcomes. A large clinical trial shows that taking a high dose of cholecalciferol for 2 years does not reduce the composite risk of developing type 2 diabetes, major cardiovascular events, or cancer, or death when compared to taking a lower dose. The high and low doses of vitamin D were 100,000 IU or 12,000 IU, respectively, every 2 weeks for 2 months, followed by monthly doses for the next 22 months (110830). The effect of a high dose of vitamin D on these outcomes individually is not clear. However, taking vitamin D does not seem to improve allograft function. A clinical study in kidney transplant recipients shows that taking cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily, beginning 1-month posttransplant and continuing for 11 months, has no effect on allograft function when compared with placebo (108425).
• Kidney transplant-related bone loss. Oral vitamin D might be beneficial for preventing bone loss associated with kidney transplantation. Details: A large clinical trial shows that taking a high dose of cholecalciferol for 2 years modestly reduces the odds of a fracture by 76% when compared to taking a lower dose. The high and low doses of vitamin D were 100,000 IU or 12,000 IU, respectively, every 2 weeks for 2 months, followed by monthly doses for the next 22 months (110830). A prespecified secondary analysis of a clinical study in patients at 1-month post-kidney transplant from a living donor in Japan shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 4000 IU daily for months 1-12 posttransplant reduces whole blood parathyroid hormone levels by 15%, but does not alter levels of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5-b or bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, when compared with placebo. The greatest effects on parathyroid hormone levels are observed in those with more severe vitamin D deficiency, hypocalcemia, and more preserved kidney function. Vitamin D supplementation also attenuates changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, but not the distal radius, from prior to transplant. Patients taking vitamin D had a loss of only 0.2%, compared with a loss of 2% in those receiving placebo. The greatest effects are observed in those with osteoporosis or osteopenia (107220). Conversely, a small clinical trial shows that taking calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) 0.25 mcg daily in combination with calcium carbonate 500 mg daily does not decrease bone loss associated with kidney transplantation. However, calcitriol might reduce osteoclast suppression, help maintain trabecular bone volume and wall thickness, and improve axial BMD (4823).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). Taking vitamin D might slow prediabetes progression to diabetes in people with low baseline levels of vitamin D or in people achieving high levels of vitamin D following supplementation. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial in people with prediabetes and sufficient vitamin D levels. Details: Observational research has found that low vitamin D levels are linked with a higher risk of prediabetes and higher dietary vitamin D is linked with a lower chance of developing diabetes (84594,103669). Meta-analyses and individual clinical studies in patients with prediabetes and unclear or sufficient vitamin D levels show that vitamin D supplementation might improve some glycemic indices, but does not seem to prevent progression of prediabetes to diabetes (84594,91347,99769,108421). However, a more recent meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies designed to evaluate the preventative effects of oral vitamin D shows that taking it in the form of cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily or 20,000 IU weekly or eldecalcitol 0.75 mcg daily reduces the risk of developing diabetes with an absolute risk reduction of 3.3% over 3 years when compared with placebo. However, the actual risk reduction is highly dependent on vitamin D status. Patients achieving the highest serum vitamin D levels have absolute 3-year risk reductions of 11.4% to 18.1% (110810). In patients with vitamin D deficiency and prediabetes, vitamin D might improve beta-cell function, suggesting reduced disease progression (99768,107210). One clinical study in adults with vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 3 months, and then monthly for 3 months, modestly improves insulin resistance and beta-cell function as measured by the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), but does not affect fasting or postprandial glucose levels when compared with placebo (99768). Further, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients with vitamin D deficiency and prediabetes shows that oral vitamin D at a median dose of 50,000 IU weekly for 26 weeks modestly improves fasting blood glucose and some markers of islet function, but not postprandial blood glucose or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, when compared with control. Additionally, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving vitamin D supplementation regressed from prediabetes to normal glucose status (107210). A meta-analysis of clinical studies in overweight or obese children and adolescents shows that high doses of vitamin D, 4000 IU daily or higher for 12-52 weeks, reduce HOMA-IR and C-reactive protein levels, but do not affect body weight, cholesterol, or parathyroid hormone (113596). A study in females with vitamin D deficiency and prediabetes shows that taking vitamin D 60,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose of 200 IU daily, has no effect on the incidence of type 2 diabetes at 2 years (107211). Clinical practice guidelines from the Endocrine Society conditionally recommend, with moderate certainty of evidence, empiric vitamin D supplementation in addition to lifestyle modification for adults with high-risk prediabetes to reduce the risk of progression to diabetes. Empiric vitamin D supplementation is defined as vitamin D from supplements or fortified food above the Recommended Dietary Allowance without having tested serum vitamin D status (114502).
• Infant development. It is unclear if giving oral vitamin D in doses above the recommended dietary allowance during infancy is beneficial for improving neurodevelopment. It is also unclear if oral vitamin D during pregnancy is beneficial for improving cognitive development in the offspring. Details: Clinical research shows that giving vitamin D 1200 IU daily to healthy term infants of Northern European ethnicity starting at 2 weeks of age does not improve measures of neurodevelopment at 2 years of age when compared with giving the standard dose of vitamin D 400 IU (106121). Overall, the evidence from population research is mixed as to whether vitamin D status during gestation is associated with infant developmental outcomes. However, some population research has found that increased vitamin D status during pregnancy is associated with improved anthropomorphic and neurodevelopmental outcomes (104621,105724). Two meta-analyses of observational research show that low vitamin D status during pregnancy is associated with reduced head circumference and cognitive development scores, and higher odds of the offspring developing autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (105724,105725). However, one meta-analysis suggests these risks may be limited to those with very low vitamin D status (serum level < 12 ng/mL) (105724). Multiple meta-analyses show that vitamin D status during pregnancy does not appear to affect motor development (105724,105725). In one observational study, plasma vitamin D concentrations in the second trimester of pregnancy was associated with increased IQ scores in the offspring at age 4-6 years. Each 10 ng/mL increase in vitamin D levels was associated with a 1.17-point increase in IQ (104621). In contrast, clinical research shows that taking vitamin D3 2800 IU daily during the third trimester does not improve neurodevelopmental outcomes in the first 6 years of life when compared to taking lower doses of 400 IU daily (104623).
• Infertility. It is unclear if oral or intramuscular vitamin D is beneficial in females with infertility. Details: Observational research in females undergoing in vitro fertilization suggests no association between dietary vitamin D intake and oocyte quality, successful embryo transfer, clinical pregnancy rate, or term pregnancy rate (112097). Additionally, a meta-analysis of clinical research in females with infertility shows that, although there was no effect of taking vitamin D on implantation rate or miscarriage, taking vitamin D increases the odds of clinical pregnancy by 49% when compared with placebo. However, sub-analyses of clinical and observational research found that benefits on clinical pregnancy rates were limited to populations with vitamin D insufficiency, but not vitamin D deficiency, and for doses between 1000 to 10,000 IU daily for 30-90 days (110818). Most studies included in the analysis used oral vitamin D; however, intramuscular vitamin D was used in one cohort study. A smaller meta-analysis of clinical studies in females with infertility and vitamin D insufficiency undergoing IVF shows that taking vitamin D increases the rate of chemical pregnancy by 50%, but has no effect on the clinical pregnancy rate (108432).
• Lichen planus. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for lichen planus. Details: A small clinical study in patients with oral lichen planus and vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency shows that taking vitamin D 60,000 IU weekly in combination with systemic steroids for 1 month reduces pain severity and improves healing of lesions when compared with systemic steroids alone (114586). The validity of the study is limited by the lack of a placebo.
• Low birth weight. It is unclear if oral vitamin D can reduce the risk for low birth weight; the available evidence is conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that a very low vitamin D status (serum level <12 ng/mL) during pregnancy is associated with lower birth weight and increased odds of SGA births. However, these risks have not been demonstrated in those with less severe vitamin D deficiency (serum level <20 ng/mL) (105724). Most research also shows that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy reduces the risk of low birth weight. A meta-analysis of three clinical trials shows that supplementation with vitamin D 800-1000 IU daily starting between 27 and 32 weeks' gestation, or 200,000 IU administered as a single dose or in two divided doses during the seventh and eighth month of pregnancy, reduces the risk of delivering a low birth weight infant by 60% (84659). Other meta-analyses of clinical research show that supplementation with vitamin D during pregnancy results in a 31% to 60% reduced risk of low birth weight and a 103 gram greater average birth weight when compared with placebo or no intervention (99766,114587). However, some meta-analyses show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of low birth weight when compared with no supplementation (95910,109055). One meta-analysis that included studies that did not directly measure birth weight shows no effect of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on the rate of low birth weight, despite showing an increase in overall birth weight of about 58 grams (95910).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D prevents lung cancer or improves lung cancer prognosis. Details: A small meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational research has found that high intake of vitamin D is associated with a 10% reduction in the risk of developing lung cancer when compared with low vitamin D intake. In terms of prognosis, high vitamin D intake is associated with improvements in both overall survival and relapse-free survival (107217).
• Male infertility. It is unclear if oral cholecalciferol is beneficial in males with infertility. Details: A small clinical study in males with infertility shows that taking cholecalciferol 2500 IU daily for 6 months modestly improves progressive sperm motility, sperm concentration, and sperm morphology when compared with baseline (108427). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Melanoma. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with melanoma. Details: A meta-analysis of 14 observational studies suggests that vitamin D deficiency is associated with a 45% greater risk of melanoma when compared with normal vitamin D levels (112027). However, a small clinical study in patients with newly resected stage II melanoma shows that taking vitamin D3 100,000 IU every 50 days for 3 years does not improve disease-free survival when compared with placebo. Most patients in this study had vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency at baseline (106113).
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing or treating metabolic syndrome. Details: In patients with metabolic syndrome, clinical research shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 16 weeks does not affect most metabolic or anthropometric factors when compared with placebo, although there was a modest decrease in triglyceride levels (106123). However, almost all of the individuals in this study were vitamin D deficient or insufficient, and many remained in that category even after supplementation. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial in vitamin D sufficient patients with metabolic syndrome. There is conflicting evidence about the association between vitamin D and metabolic syndrome (14265,16713,98234). Some population research has found that higher vitamin D levels are associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome, while other research found no association (14265,16713). Furthermore, a small clinical trial in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that taking vitamin D 20,000 IU or 40,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks does not affect metabolic risk factors when compared with placebo (98234).
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if oral vitamin D reduces the frequency of migraine. Details: A meta-analysis of three small high-quality clinical studies in patients with migraine shows that taking vitamin D 2000 or 4000 IU daily for 12-24 weeks or 500,000 IU weekly for 2 months reduces the frequency of migraines by 2-3 attacks monthly when compared with usual care or placebo (108439).
• Miscarriage. Oral vitamin D has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in pregnant adults with threatened miscarriage between the 6th and 13th week of gestation shows that taking a specific combination product (DAV HA, Lo.Li pharma s.r.l) containing vitamin D 50 mcg, alpha-lipoic acid, hyaluronic acid, magnesium, and vitamin B6 daily in combination with conventional treatment of vaginal progesterone over 2 weeks of observation results in a faster resorption of the subchorionic hematoma and faster decrease of patient-reported vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, and uterine contractions when compared with vaginal progesterone alone (113893). It is unclear if these effects are due to vitamin D, other ingredients, or the combination. Additionally, the validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a placebo for the control group.
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Although vitamin D supplementation has been linked with a lower risk of developing MS, taking oral vitamin D supplements does not seem to reduce MS relapses. Details: Vitamin D deficiency appears to be linked to the risk of MS development and progression. Population research suggests that long-term supplementation with vitamin D 400 IU is associated with a 40% lower risk of MS in females. The effect seems to be dose-dependent. Consumption of at least 400 IU daily, mainly in the form of a multivitamin supplement, appears to have the greatest protective effect (11356). Additional population research in over 7 million people suggests that higher levels of calcifediol are associated with a lower risk of developing MS. In white adults, for every 20 ng/mL increase in vitamin D levels, there appears to be a 41% decrease in MS risk. However, this was not found in black and Hispanic adults (15159). Vitamin D supplementation has also been examined in patients with MS. Population research suggests that taking vitamin D supplements and the maintenance of optimal blood levels of vitamin D are associated with a reduction in the development of new areas of demyelination detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over 24 months. However, there are no correlations between vitamin D consumption or vitamin D blood levels and clinical outcomes (110816). Also, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to impact MS relapses or most symptoms in patients with MS. Meta-analyses of preliminary clinical research show that vitamin D supplementation does not affect the rate of MS relapses, overall symptoms, disability scores, or the number of MS nerve lesions detected by MRI, regardless whether the vitamin D was low-dose or high-dose (98192,98914,106119,113586). However, one meta-analysis of 6 small clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D for 8-96 weeks slightly improves fatigue scores when compared with placebo (112024). These analyses are limited by the small size and heterogeneity of most of the included studies and variability in dosing and duration of vitamin D regimens.
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral vitamin D improves muscle strength in middle aged or older adults with low or sufficient levels of vitamin D. The available research is conflicting. Details: Clinical research in healthy older adults who are not deficient in vitamin D shows that oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation, with 800 IU, 1000 IU, or 2000 IU daily or 50,000 IU monthly, alone or in combination with a resistance training program, does not increase muscle strength when compared with placebo (11814,104619,108429). In patients 40-80 years of age with low vitamin D levels, taking vitamin D3 100,000 IU (2500 mcg) once, followed by 20,000 IU (500 mcg) weekly for 4 months, does not improve muscle strength when compared with placebo (103658). Similarly, meta-analyses of clinical research show that vitamin D does not increase grip strength, muscle mass, global muscle strength, or back extensor strength when compared with control (91341,113595). However, some research has found some benefit with the use of vitamin D supplements. One meta-analysis shows that taking vitamin D increases grip strength after menopause when compared with placebo or low-dose vitamin D, although a sub-analysis shows that beneficial effects are limited to individuals aged 60-69 years, when vitamin D is taken without calcium, when baseline vitamin D levels are at least 30 ng/mL, or when the treatment consists of the vitamin D analog alfacalcidol. This suggests heterogeneity between studies (109048). Another meta-analysis in elderly adults shows that taking vitamin D as calcifediol 10-30 mcg daily for a median of 24 weeks modestly improves hand grip strength and leg extension, but not leg flexion, when compared with baseline (109042). Also, some individual clinical research in older adults with low levels of vitamin D at baseline shows that taking vitamin D3 800 IU daily or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) 1000 IU daily for 12 months in combination with calcium 1000 mg daily modestly improves lower extremity or hip strength by 8% to 23% when compared with calcium alone (38915,84530).
• Myalgia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for reducing myalgia associated with obesity. Details: Preliminary clinical research in obese individuals with vitamin D deficiency who are on a low-calorie diet shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly, alone or in combination with an aerobic exercise program three times weekly for 12 weeks, modestly reduces muscle pain when compared with only aerobic exercise three times weekly (106118).
• Myelodysplastic syndromes. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Details: A small observational study in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes has found that taking calcitriol or calcifediol orally is associated with slowed disease progression (11825).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral or intramuscular vitamin D is beneficial in children or adults with NAFLD. Details: Although findings from individual research are mixed, one meta-analysis of mainly small clinical trials in patients with NAFLD shows that vitamin D modestly improves insulin resistance and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, with no effect on serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels. Most studies included in the analysis used oral vitamin D 1000 IU daily or 50,000 IU weekly or biweekly for 3-6 months and compared with placebo; however, one study used a single intramuscular injection of vitamin D 600,000 IU compared with lifestyle modifications (109056). Vitamin D has also been evaluated in combination with fish oil. A clinical study in adults with NAFLD shows that taking oral vitamin D3 1680 IU daily in combination with fish oil or fish oil alone for 3 months improves serum ALT levels similarly to a control group (107186). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for use in children with NAFLD. One clinical study in children with obesity and biopsy-proven NAFLD shows that taking oral vitamin D3 2000 IU daily for 6 months with a hypocaloric diet improves liver histopathology in terms of steatosis, lobular inflammation, and NAFLD activity score at 6 months, but not hepatocyte ballooning or fibrosis, when compared with baseline. These improvements were not seen in the group receiving placebo with a hypocaloric diet, but it is unclear if the improvement from baseline differed between groups (107222).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking vitamin D3 1000 IU daily for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking vitamin D3 with calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate reduces the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but has no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma. Vitamin D taken alone has no effect on the risk for either type of cancer (104622).
• Obesity. The evidence for the use of oral vitamin D in obesity is conflicting and unclear. Details: Population research has found that people with lower vitamin D levels are significantly more likely to be obese when compared to people with higher vitamin D levels (15630). Also, a large-scale, high-quality clinical trial in postmenopausal adults taking calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily for 3 years shows that these patients are more likely to lose weight and maintain their weight when compared with those taking placebo. This beneficial effect is mainly seen in females who have inadequate intake of calcium, less than 1200 mg/day, before starting a calcium supplement (15604). However, other evidence suggests that vitamin D alone does not improve weight loss. One clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D3 2000 IU/day without calcium for 12 months does not increase weight loss when compared with placebo in overweight and obese postmenopausal adults who are deficient in vitamin D at baseline (91345).
• Orthostatic hypotension. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for prevention of orthostatic hypotension. Details: A secondary analysis of a clinical study in older patients with vitamin D insufficiency who are at an increased risk for falls shows that taking vitamin D 1000-4000 IU daily for up to 2 years has no effect on the risk of orthostatic hypotension or orthostatic symptoms when compared with those receiving vitamin D 200 IU daily (107223).
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for osteoarthritis. Details: The evidence for the use of vitamin D in osteoarthritis is conflicting. Some clinical research shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily, or at a higher dose to reach serum vitamin D levels over 36 ng/mL, for 2 years does not reduce knee pain or loss of cartilage when compared with placebo in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (84688). However, another clinical study shows that taking vitamin D3 daily for 10 days and then vitamin D3 60,000 IU monthly for 12 months modestly reduces pain and improves function when compared with placebo in patients with osteoarthritis and vitamin D insufficiency (98199). It is possible that higher doses of vitamin D have an effect on osteoarthritis, while lower doses do not. Due to this conflicting and low-quality evidence, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommends against the use of vitamin D for any form of osteoarthritis (102114).
• Otitis media. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with otitis media. Details: The relationship between vitamin D status and otitis media is unclear. Population research has found that having otitis media is associated with lower blood levels of vitamin D; however, lower vitamin D levels were not associated with greater risk of otitis media (98194).
• Overactive bladder. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for overactive bladder in children or adults. Details: A large clinical trial in older males shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily for 5 years does not reduce the odds of weekly overactive bladder when compared with placebo. In males with low baseline serum vitamin D, taking vitamin D reduces the odds of overactive bladder at 5 years by 49%, including 34% reduced odds of overactive bladder with urinary incontinence and 81% reduced odds of overactive bladder without incontinence. However, urinary incontinence while sleeping or napping was increased (109738). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for overactive bladder in children with low vitamin D levels. A large, single-blind clinical study in children with overactive bladder without urinary incontinence, and with vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency, shows that taking vitamin D 2400 IU daily for 8 weeks with standard urotherapy reduces voiding frequency by about 3 or 4 voids daily when compared with standard urotherapy, with or without solifenacin 5 mg daily (115574,115591). Standard urotherapy was defined in this study as medical education, timed voiding, and pelvic floor muscle training.
• Overall mortality. Taking oral vitamin D alone does not seem to reduce mortality; however, there is some evidence that taking certain forms of vitamin D with calcium might have a modest benefit. Details: While higher vitamin D levels have been associated with a small reduction in mortality when compared with lower vitamin D levels (98187), clinical research shows that taking vitamin D does not reduce the risk of mortality. A comprehensive meta-analysis shows that vitamin D supplementation alone does not reduce all-cause mortality when compared to control (100900). However, giving vitamin D with calcium may modestly reduce the risk of mortality. Meta-analyses show a 4% to 9% reduced risk of mortality when trials of vitamin D alone and vitamin D with calcium are pooled together (16102,97296,98186,112022). Finally, some research suggests that the type of vitamin D supplementation might influence the results. A meta-analysis of clinical research found that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) with or without calcium reduces mortality risk by 6%, while alfacalcidol, calcitriol, and vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) do not have benefit (84595,98186). Other clinical research suggests that vitamin D supplementation in older adults may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality by about 4%, with an estimated effect size of 6 fewer deaths per 1000 individuals. This finding informed the 2024 Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines on vitamin D for the prevention of disease in the general population. The Endocrine Society conditionally recommends, with moderate certainty of evidence, empiric vitamin D supplementation from fortified foods or vitamin D-containing supplements in the general population aged 75 years and older to potentially lower the risk of mortality. Empiric vitamin D is defined as vitamin D above the Recommended Dietary Allowance without having tested serum vitamin D status. For empiric supplementation and for those who have indications for vitamin D treatment or supplementation, daily lower-dose versus intermittent higher doses was suggested (114502).
• Pain (chronic). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for chronic pain. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with chronic pain shows that taking vitamin D for 1-24 months produces a 43% greater decrease in pain score when compared with placebo. However, the final follow-up pain score is similar for both groups (96402). The effect of vitamin D on pain based on pain-related diagnosis, vitamin D status, or dose is unknown.
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for this condition. Details: Population research found that higher levels of vitamin D are associated with milder Parkinson disease symptoms, while deficiency is associated with increased risk of Parkinson disease (97000,99772). One small study shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1200 IU daily for one year might modestly slow the progression of Parkinson disease based on the Hoehn and Yars staging criteria. However, there was no improvement in disease severity according to the more widely used Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Stage (UPDRS). The UPDRS includes measures of activities of daily living and non-motor symptoms. Vitamin D had no effect on most quality of life measures (95915).
• Periodontitis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for periodontal disease. Details: A meta-analysis of mostly observational research suggests that vitamin D levels are not associated with an increased or decreased risk of periodontitis (112026). Other population research suggests that higher blood levels of vitamin D may be associated with a reduced risk of periodontal disease in adults 50 years of age or older. However, this association was not found for adults younger than 50 years (15634).
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral vitamin D improves muscle strength in elderly adults. Details: Some clinical research in healthy older adults who are not deficient in vitamin D shows that oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation, with 800 IU, 1000 IU, or 2000 IU daily or 50,000 IU monthly, alone or in combination with a resistance training program, does not improve physical performance when compared with placebo (11814,104619,108429). Also, results from one meta-analysis of clinical research in postmenopausal females with low levels of vitamin D shows that taking vitamin D does not improve the timed up and go test when compared with placebo or low-dose vitamin D (109048). One meta-analysis that included studies specifically evaluating the use of calcifediol in older adults shows a large benefit on gait speed; however, only one study included in the analysis used this endpoint and other measures of physical performance were not affected (109042).
• Pneumonia. High-dose oral vitamin D does not reduce pneumonia severity in children. Details: Although vitamin D supplementation might prevent respiratory tract infections in children, it might not prevent recurrent pneumonia. A small clinical study in children under 5 years of age with recurrent pneumonia and variable vitamin D blood levels shows that taking vitamin D 300,000 IU quarterly for 1 year does not reduce respiratory infections, severity of pneumonia, hospital admissions, or disease complications when compared with placebo (103667). However, it's unknown if vitamin D supplementation using lower and more frequent doses, or supplementation in patients with vitamin D deficiency, might be beneficial. Some observational research has found that having vitamin D deficiency is linked to a higher risk for developing community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) (102118). For information on other respiratory infections, refer to the Respiratory Tract Infection discussion.
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if vitamin D improves pregnancy rates and outcomes, clinical symptoms, metabolic parameters, or hormone levels in patients with PCOS. Details: Observational research in adults with infertility, PCOS, and insulin resistance suggests that normal vitamin D levels are associated with better embryo quality and increased pregnancy rate when compared with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency (100834). It is unclear if supplementation with vitamin D improves pregnancy rates in patients with PCOS. A meta-analysis of several mostly low-quality clinical studies in patients with PCOS and vitamin D deficiency at baseline shows that intramuscular or oral vitamin D 200-10,000 IU daily for up to 24 weeks in addition to fertility treatment improves pregnancy rates and reduces premature miscarriage and premature delivery, but does not impact the incidence of pregnancy complications including gestational hypertension or gestational diabetes, when compared with control. This analysis also suggests vitamin D supplementation improves certain IVF-related outcomes including ovulation rate, fertilization rate, and number of mature oocytes (112787). An earlier meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin D 400-12,000 IU daily for 2-6 months improves follicular development when compared with placebo. Taking vitamin D in combination with metformin 1500 mg daily also appears to increase the number of regular menstrual cycles by 85% when compared with metformin alone, but without an effect on follicular development (96404). However, a meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies shows that combining vitamin D with metformin probably does not improve menstrual cycle regulation when compared with metformin alone (113594). The effect of vitamin D on the hormonal and metabolic profiles of patients with PCOS has also been evaluated. An umbrella review of up to 15 meta-analyses of clinical studies in patients with PCOS shows that taking vitamin D 2000-8500 IU daily for 6.5-13.5 weeks reduces levels of serum triglycerides, total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and total testosterone, but not body mass index (BMI) or insulin levels, when compared with placebo (115577). A separate meta-analysis of 9 clinical studies, not included in the umbrella review, shows that combining vitamin D with metformin reduces insulin resistance, BMI, and testosterone levels when compared with metformin alone (113594). Additionally, a small clinical study in adults with PCOS and vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily in combination with diet and exercise for 12 weeks reduces insulin resistance, BMI, waist to hip ratio, serum triglyceride levels, and total and LDL cholesterol levels when compared with diet and exercise alone (114580). The interpretation of the results in this clinical study is limited by the lack of a placebo control.
• Post-stroke fatigue. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for post-stroke fatigue. Details: A retrospective study in patients with post-stroke fatigue and vitamin D deficiency suggests that vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 600 IU daily is associated with improvements in fatigue severity at months 1 and 3 when compared with control. Neurologic disability also showed improvement at 3 months, but not at 1 month, when compared with control. It is unclear if improvements from baseline differed between groups (107225).
• Pre-eclampsia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D during pregnancy is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of pre-eclampsia. Details: While some clinical research suggests that taking vitamin D during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia (113585,114587), clinical practice guidelines from the Endocrine Society conditionally recommend, based on low certainty of evidence, empiric vitamin D supplementation from daily intake of fortified foods, vitamin D supplements, or prenatal vitamin formulations that contain vitamin D during pregnancy to potentially lower the risk of preeclampsia, intra-uterine mortality, preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA) birth, and neonatal mortality. Empiric vitamin D supplementation is defined as supplementing with vitamin D above the Recommended Dietary Allowance without having tested serum vitamin D status (114502).
• Precocious puberty. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of precocious puberty. Details: A meta-analysis of 43 mostly observational studies from China suggests that vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency is associated with 2.25-fold greater odds of precocious puberty when compared with normal vitamin D levels. Taking vitamin D 200-1000 IU daily for 3-12 months along with a gonadotropic-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa) is associated with lower luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and estradiol levels and reduced bone age when compared with GnRHa therapy alone (112019). Another meta-analysis of 15 studies, mainly from China and with high heterogeneity and publication bias, suggests that there is a negative correlation between serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D concentrations and precocious puberty, and that vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of precocious puberty by about 53% (113578).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for patients with gestational hypertension. Details: Meta-analyses of two low-quality clinical trials show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk for gestational hypertension when compared with control (95910,114587).
• Prematurity. It is unclear if taking vitamin D during pregnancy prevents respiratory complications in preterm neonates. Details: A large clinical study in pregnant patients with gestational age less than 34 weeks and at risk of preterm delivery shows that a single intramuscular injection of vitamin D 50,000 IU within 72 hours before delivery decreases the risk of respiratory distress syndrome treated by surfactant in the neonate by about 2.25-fold and increases the 5th minute APGAR scores, but not 1st minute APGAR scores, gestational age, neonatal intensive care unit admission, length of hospital stay, or delivery method, when compared with no treatment (114581).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with PMS. Details: Observational research has found that increasing dietary intake of vitamin D above 706 IU daily is linked to a reduced risk of developing PMS when compared with consuming 112 IU daily (13094). Furthermore, a clinical study shows that taking vitamin D 400 IU daily in combination with calcium 1000 mg daily can decrease the severity of PMS symptoms (16869). Another clinical study in adolescent females with PMS shows that taking vitamin D3 50,000 IU weekly for 9 weeks modestly reduces PMS symptoms when compared to baseline (98912). A small clinical study in young adults with PMS and vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU every 2 weeks for 16 weeks reduces psychological symptom scores by 54% and physical symptom scores by 39% when compared with placebo (113582).
• Preterm labor. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preterm labor. Details: Vitamin D deficiency, defined as serum levels less than 20 ng/mL, during pregnancy has been associated with a 25% greater risk of preterm birth (95911). The risk seems to be especially prominent in those with darker colored skin (103662). However, meta-analyses of clinical research show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of a preterm birth when compared with no supplementation with vitamin D (84659,95910,109055,114587). The effect vitamin D specifically in vitamin D-deficient patients is still unclear. Some small, heterogeneous, and low-quality studies show that vitamin D supplementation might reduce the rate of preterm birth in vitamin D-deficient patients (84659,95910). Additional studies are needed to determine the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the risk of preterm birth. Clinical practice guidelines from the Endocrine Society conditionally recommend, based on low certainty of evidence, empiric vitamin D supplementation from daily intake of fortified foods, vitamin D supplements, or prenatal vitamin formulations that contain vitamin D during pregnancy to potentially lower the risk of preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA) birth, preeclampsia, intra-uterine mortality, and neonatal mortality. Empiric vitamin D supplementation iss defined as supplementing with vitamin D above the Recommended Dietary Allowance without having tested serum vitamin D status (114502).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Small clinical studies suggest that oral vitamin D may not improve symptoms in patients with RA. Details: Population research has found that higher intake of vitamin D from foods or supplements is associated with a lower risk of developing RA (12206,98200). However, a meta-analysis of two small clinical trials shows that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce pain or recurrence of RA when compared with placebo (98190).
• Rhinosinusitis. Oral vitamin D has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients over 12 years of age with chronic sinusitis shows that taking 1 or 2 sachets of a specific combination product (Flogostop Forte, Humana Italia) containing vitamin D 600 IU, black currant, Boswellia serrata, and bromelain along with a nasal corticosteroid daily for 15-30 days reduces symptoms of nasal hyperemia and rhinorrhea when compared with corticosteroid nasal spray alone (111501). It is unclear if these findings are due to vitamin D, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Sarcopenia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in older adults with sarcopenia. Details: A meta-analysis of randomized trials in older adults with sarcopenia shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 100-800 IU daily, with protein 10-44 grams daily or amino acids 2.5-6 grams daily, for 2-6 months moderately improves muscle strength, but not muscle mass or walking speed, when compared with placebo (105727). The validity of this study is limited by high heterogeneity and an unreported baseline vitamin D status. Similarly, a small network meta-analysis of randomized trials shows that taking vitamin D 500-1600 IU daily or 2500-5000 IU weekly with protein 20-80 grams daily or amino acids 3-32 grams daily with and without exercise for 3-18 months increases hand grip strength and shortens time to chair-stand, respectively, but not gait speed or lower-limb mass when compared with usual care (107221). It is unclear if these effects are due to vitamin D, protein/amino acid supplementation, exercise, or the combinations.
• Schizophrenia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for schizophrenia. Details: Based on preliminary clinical evidence, Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that vitamin D in doses of 1500 to 4000 IU daily is not recommended for adjunctive use in patients with schizophrenia (110318). A moderate-sized clinical study in patients with schizophrenia shows that taking a specific combination product (BioZenD, Tak Gen Zist Pharmaceutical Company) containing vitamin D 400 IU in combination with a blend of probiotics (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Bifidobacterium longum, Bacillus coagulans) 2 x 10⁹ CFU daily for 12 weeks improves cognitive function scores but does not improve the severity of positive and negative schizophrenia symptoms when compared with placebo (114582). It is unclear if this effect is due to vitamin D, the probiotics, or the combination.
• Sciatica. Oral vitamin D has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary research in adults up to 45 years of age with discogenic sciatica shows that taking cholecalciferol 800 IU with alpha-lipoic acid, acetyl-L-carnitine, and resveratrol daily for 30 days, in combination with a 20-session rehabilitation protocol, improves pain, disability, and quality of life when compared with the supplements alone or the rehabilitation protocol alone (112933).
• Seasonal affective disorder (SAD). One small study suggests that a large dose of oral vitamin D can improve symptoms of SAD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with SAD suggests that a single dose of vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) 100,000 IU improves symptoms after one month when compared to baseline (83791). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Seborrheic keratosis. It is unclear if topical vitamin D analogues improve symptoms of seborrheic keratosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research suggests that topical ointments containing activated vitamin D in the form of tacalcitol, calcipotriol or maxacalcitol, applied for 3-12 months, can reduce tumor volume by at least 40% in 75% of patients with seborrheic keratosis. Additionally, over 30% of patients seem to experience complete tumor resolution or a reduction in tumor volume of at least 80% (84033). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Sexual dysfunction. One small study suggests that injecting a large dose of vitamin D might improve sexual function. Details: A small clinical study in females with vitamin D deficiency and sexual dysfunction shows that receiving an intramuscular injection of vitamin D as cholecalciferol 300,000 IU once at baseline and a second time 4 weeks later improves sexual function at 4 and 8 weeks when compared with placebo (100896).
• Sickle cell disease. One small study suggests that oral vitamin D reduces pain and improves quality of life in children with sickle cell disease with vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency. Details: A small clinical study in children with sickle cell disease shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 40,000-100,000 IU weekly for 6 weeks reduces days with pain and improves physical activity and quality of life for up to 6 months when compared with placebo. Of the children included in the study, 82.5% had vitamin D insufficiency, while 52.5% were deficient in vitamin D (98918). It is unclear if vitamin D is effective for patients with sickle cell disease who have adequate levels of vitamin D.
• Small for gestational age (SGA). It is unclear if oral vitamin D can reduce the risk for SGA births; the available evidence is conflicting. Details: Two meta-analyses of clinical research show no effect of vitamin D on the risk of SGA birth (84659,109055). However, one meta-analysis shows a 40% reduction in the risk of SGA births with vitamin D supplementation (95910). Also, one meta-analysis shows that when vitamin D supplementation is initiated before the 20^th week of gestation, the risk of SGA is reduced by 54% (109055). Most individual clinical trials are small and heterogeneous. Also, the formulation of vitamin D and/or vitamin D status at baseline may explain part of the discrepant findings. For example, a meta-analysis of observational research has found that a very low vitamin D status (serum level <12 ng/mL) during pregnancy is associated with increased odds of SGA births. This association does not seem to be present with less severe vitamin D deficiency (serum level <20 ng/mL) (105724). Clinical practice guidelines from the Endocrine Society conditionally recommend, with low certainty of evidence, empiric vitamin D supplementation from daily intake of fortified foods, vitamin D supplements, or prenatal vitamin formulations that contain vitamin D during pregnancy to potentially lower the risk of SGA births, as well as preeclampsia, intra-uterine mortality, preterm birth, and neonatal mortality. Empiric vitamin D supplementation is defined as supplementing with vitamin D above the Recommended Dietary Allowance without having tested serum vitamin D status (114502).
• Statin-induced myalgia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for patients with statin-induced myalgia. Details: Observational research has found that taking oral vitamin D supplements is associated with decreased symptoms of myalgia in patients taking statin drugs. In a small case series, patients who discontinued statins due to myalgia were able to resume statin therapy after starting vitamin D supplements. The majority of patients with myalgia were found to be vitamin D deficient, with vitamin D levels less than 12 ng/mL at baseline (16829). An observational study has also found that administering 50,000 units of vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) once a week for 12 weeks reversed symptoms of myalgia in 92% of statin treated patients with low serum vitamin D levels of less than 32 ng/mL (16831).
• Stroke. Although low vitamin D levels are associated with higher risk of stroke, taking vitamin D supplements does not seem to reduce stroke risk. Details: Population research has found that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk of stroke. Furthermore, increased dietary intake of vitamin D is associated with a reduced risk of stroke (15630,16618,93944,97303,106106). However, clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce stroke risk. Several meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials show that taking vitamin D alone or with calcium does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with or without cardiovascular disease risk factors (16616,91343,97296,97308,106106,112022). It is difficult to draw firm conclusions from these studies, as they did not assess whether patients had adequate vitamin D levels at baseline. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation might prevent strokes in patients with vitamin D deficiency.
• Sunburn. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin D for the treatment of sunburns, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin D for this purpose.
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with SLE. Details: While some observational research has found that adults with SLE are more likely to have vitamin D deficiency than healthy controls (102119), a small cross-sectional study in females has found no association between serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, SLE disease activity, and the presence or absence of lupus nephritis (107214). A meta-analysis of three small clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily or 50,000 IU weekly seems to reduce anti-dsDNA positive, a marker of disease activity, when compared with placebo in patients with SLE (98190). However, the clinical significance of this finding is unclear. A small clinical trial in females with SLE shows that taking vitamin D3 5000 IU daily for 12 weeks modestly improves overall disease activity, but not quality of life, when compared with placebo (109735).
• Thyroid cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with thyroid cancer. Details: Observational research in patients undergoing thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer suggests that taking vitamin D daily for at least 6 months after surgery is associated with a 38% lower risk of all-cause mortality and a 33% lower risk of total cancer-related mortality when compared with no vitamin D supplementation at around 10 years' follow-up. However, vitamin D does not appear to be linked to a lower risk of thyroid cancer-related mortality in these patients (112018).
• Ulcerative colitis. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D may be beneficial in patients with ulcerative colitis. Details: A meta-analysis of mainly small clinical trials in patients treated with mesalazine shows that taking vitamin D for up to 24 weeks modestly increases clinical efficacy and reduces disease score when compared with mesalazine alone (109044). Also, a meta-analysis of small, low-quality clinical studies in patients with IBD, including Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, shows that taking high- or low-dose vitamin D for up to 1 year reduces the rate of relapse when compared with control (98915). These findings are limited because of the heterogeneity of the included studies.
• Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for dementia. Details: A large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D 2800 IU daily, starting at gestational week 24 and continuing until one week after birth, reduces the risk of the child developing croup by 3 years of age by 40% when compared with olive oil as placebo. This risk reduction did not change after adjusting for the use of omega-3 fatty acids 2.4 grams daily, as well as for concomitant persistent wheeze and/or lower respiratory tract infections (109304).
• Urinary incontinence. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D may be beneficial in middle-aged, but not older, adults with urinary incontinence. Details: Clinical research in middle-aged premenopausal females with stress urinary incontinence and low vitamin D status shows that taking vitamin D 5000 IU once weekly for 12 weeks has a moderate to large beneficial effect on the severity of incontinence and quality of life when compared with placebo. Kegel exercises were performed by all participants (109736). However, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to be beneficial for reducing urinary incontinence in older adults. In older females and males, a large clinical trial shows that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily for 5 years does not reduce the incidence or progression of urinary incontinence when compared with placebo (109738,109741). In older males with low vitamin D status, vitamin D supplementation may actually increase some types of incontinence (109738).
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention of UTIs in children. Details: A meta-analysis of 13 small observational studies in children suggests that lower levels of vitamin D are associated with 2.8-fold greater odds of UTI when compared with higher vitamin D levels. Further, this analysis shows that vitamin D deficiency in children is linked to 5.5-fold greater odds of UTI when compared with normal vitamin D levels (112030).
• Urticaria. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of urticaria. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that having urticaria is associated with a slightly lower vitamin D blood level and a greater likelihood of vitamin D deficiency when compared with individuals without urticaria. In addition, a meta-analysis of 6 clinical trials shows that taking vitamin D at an average daily dose of at least 4100 IU has a modest effect on the severity of urticaria symptoms (106115). Pooled data from 2 clinical studies in adults with chronic urticaria shows that taking vitamin D for 12 weeks, either as cholecalciferol 60,000 IU every 2 weeks or as alfacalcidol, 0.25 mcg once daily, reduces pruritus severity when compared with placebo (115587).
• Uterine fibroids. Low vitamin D status is associated with uterine fibroids and some clinical research suggests that taking vitamin D may modestly decrease the size of uterine fibroids. Details: Two meta-analyses of 5 clinical studies in premenopausal adults with uterine fibroids shows that taking vitamin D, either 50,000 IU weekly or biweekly for 8-12 weeks or 1000 IU daily for 1 year, decreases fibroid size when compared with placebo or no treatment (113577,115573). One of the meta-analyses found a 5.7% difference in fibroid size between vitamin D and control (115573). Observational research also suggests that vitamin D status is associated with uterine fibroids. Specifically, meta-analyses of a total 23 observational studies suggest that individuals with uterine fibroids have lower serum vitamin D levels and a 3.7-times higher odds of vitamin D deficiency (115573).
• Vaginal atrophy. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for vaginal atrophy. There is limited evidence on the topical use of vitamin D in vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal adults or patients taking tamoxifen. Details: A small cross-sectional study in postmenopausal adults has found that taking a vitamin D supplement for at least one year improves the maturation index of superficial vaginal wall cells when compared with those who do not take vitamin D. However, symptoms of vaginal atrophy were not different between groups (16879). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for vaginal atrophy due to tamoxifen. A small clinical trial in females with breast cancer using tamoxifen shows that receiving vitamin D 1000 IU vaginal suppositories daily for 8 weeks improves maturation index of vaginal walls and self-reported symptoms when compared with placebo (99773).
• Vertigo. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with vertigo. Details: An analysis of observational research suggests that lower serum levels of vitamin D are associated with a higher risk of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) when compared with higher vitamin D levels (114579). However, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation can reduce the risk of BPPV in individuals with low vitamin D levels. Vitamin D has been evaluated in combination with other ingredients for the treatment of BPPV. A large clinical study in adults with recurrent BPPV shows that taking vitamin D 400 IU and calcium 500 mg twice daily for one year reduces the risk of recurrence by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 4 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination.
• Vitiligo. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin D for vitiligo, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin D for this condition.
• Warts. Although there is interest in using topical vitamin D derivatives for warts, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin D for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate vitamin D for these uses.

(Read more about VITAMIN D)

EFFECTIVE

• Ataxia with vitamin E deficiency (AVED). Oral vitamin E is effective for treating vitamin E deficiency due to the genetic disorder AVED. Details: This genetic disorder occurs when the gene that produces alpha-tocopherol transfer protein (alpha-TTP) is defective. This causes severe vitamin E deficiency. Symptoms such as cerebellar ataxia, dysarthria, absence of deep tendon reflexes, and sensory loss usually appear between 4 and 18 years of age. Vitamin E supplements are used in the treatment of AVED (13498,101437,101438).
• Vitamin E deficiency. Oral vitamin E is effective for preventing or treating vitamin E deficiency and associated conditions. Details: Taking vitamin E orally is effective for preventing and treating vitamin E deficiency (4844). However, vitamin E deficiency is rare in humans. It most commonly occurs in people with malabsorption disorders such as abetalipoproteinemia; cystic fibrosis; gastrectomy; hepatic-biliary tract disease including chronic cholestasis, hepatic cirrhosis, biliary atresia, and obstructive jaundice; in infants receiving formula with insufficient vitamin E; intestinal diseases including celiac and tropical sprue; and regional enteritis (4844,104411).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Alzheimer disease. Oral vitamin E might slow functional decline in some patients with this condition. However, it does not seem to prevent Alzheimer disease onset. Details: A clinical study in patients with moderate Alzheimer disease shows that taking all-rac-alpha-tocopherol (synthetic vitamin E) 2000 IU daily for 2 years might be similar to selegiline (Eldepryl), and superior to placebo, for slowing cognitive decline. Benefit was only apparent when outcomes were adjusted for baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. This study is limited by attrition bias, or incomplete outcome reporting (4635,97070). Another clinical study in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease shows that taking all-rac-alpha-tocopherol 2000 IU daily reduces the annual rate of decline in activities of daily living by 19% when compared with placebo. This translates to a delay in disease progression of 6.2 months. This is comparable to the effect of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., rivastigmine) in this population. Despite these positive findings, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends against the use of vitamin E for the management of dementia due to the increased risk for adverse effects with the extended use of high-dose vitamin E (104823). Interestingly, the combination of vitamin E and memantine (Namenda) 20 mg per day is not superior to placebo in this population. Researchers speculate that this lack of effectiveness may be due to an interaction between vitamin E and memantine, but this proposed interaction has not been validated in research (19060,97070). Vitamin E supplementation doesn't seem to prevent Alzheimer disease or slow progression of mild cognitive impairment. Patients with mild cognitive impairment who take vitamin E 2000 IU daily for 3 years progress to Alzheimer disease at the same rate as those who take placebo (13060,97070). Furthermore, although population research has found that greater intake of foods high in vitamin E is associated with a lower risk of developing Alzheimer disease (34597,90082), taking vitamin E supplements does not seem to help. Evidence from a large clinical study that was later converted into an observational study shows that taking vitamin E 400 IU orally daily does not prevent Alzheimer disease when compared with placebo in cognitively intact men (93570). However, this study is limited by the fact that the participants were well-educated and were assessed for dementia in their 60s; the prevalence of dementia is typically low in this age group (93571).
• Beta-thalassemia. Oral vitamin E seems to be beneficial for children with this condition. Details: A small clinical study in children with beta-thalassemia and low vitamin E plasma concentrations shows that taking vitamin E orally seems to correct erythrocyte membrane abnormalities when compared with control (4642). Another small clinical trial in children 5-18 years of age with beta-thalassemia shows that taking an age-based dose of vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) 200-600 mg daily for 4 weeks seems to increase haptoglobin levels, suggesting reduced hemolysis, when compared with placebo (104412).
• Dysmenorrhea. Oral vitamin E seems to reduce pain in adults with dysmenorrhea. Details: Small clinical studies in younger adults with primary dysmenorrhea show that taking vitamin E 200-500 IU daily, starting 2 days before menstruation and continuing through the first 3 days of bleeding for 2-4 cycles, decreases the severity and duration of pain and reduces blood loss when compared with placebo (10361,14432,99367). One study also shows that taking vitamin E 200 IU with fish oil provides better pain relief when compared with taking either vitamin E or omega-3 fatty acids alone (99367). A meta-analysis of 8 small clinical studies, including those described above, in individuals with dysmenorrhea shows that taking vitamin E reduces the severity of pain when compared with placebo (112170).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. Oral vitamin E seems to modestly reduce exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A meta-analysis of 17 very small clinical studies in trained and untrained adults shows that taking vitamin E 300-1200 IU daily for up to 12 weeks reduces markers of exercise-induced muscle damage, including creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase, when compared with placebo. Vitamin E appears to be most beneficial in athletes and at doses under 500 IU daily (112160). However, a small clinical study in endurance-trained runners, not included in the analysis above, shows that taking vitamin E (as alpha-tocopherol) 235 mg and vitamin C 1000 mg 2 hours prior to an exercise protocol does not reduce delayed onset muscle soreness or improve markers of exercise-induced muscle damage when compared with placebo (109961).
• Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Oral vitamin E seems to be beneficial in patients with G6PD deficiency. Details: Individual clinical studies evaluating the use of vitamin E in patients with G6PD deficiency show mixed results (4682,4683,4684). However, a meta-analysis of 6 small clinical studies in patients with G6PD deficiency shows that taking vitamin E improves hemoglobin levels and reduces reticulocyte levels when compared with placebo in the setting of both acute and chronic hemolysis (112164).
• Intracranial hemorrhage. Oral vitamin E might reduce the risk of intracranial hemorrhage in premature infants. Details: Clinical research shows that giving premature neonates vitamin E orally might reduce the risk of intracranial hemorrhage when compared with control (4655,85074).
• Intraventricular hemorrhage. Oral vitamin E might reduce the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage in premature infants. Intravenous vitamin E does not provide this benefit. Details: A meta-analysis of the available clinical research shows that oral, but not intravenous, administration of vitamin E can reduce the risk for intraventricular hemorrhage in premature neonates when compared with control. However, it might not reduce the risk for severe (grade III-IV) intraventricular hemorrhage. Additionally, high serum levels of vitamin E have been associated with an increased risk for sepsis in premature infants (85062).
• Nitrate tolerance. Oral vitamin E might reduce tolerance to nitrates. Details: Nitrate tolerance might involve increased vascular superoxide anion production, and antioxidants may help prevent this (4705). Clinical research in patients with ischemic heart disease shows that taking vitamin E 447-894 IU daily can help prevent nitrate tolerance when compared with placebo (4705,11543).
• Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Oral vitamin E seems to improve outcomes in patients with NASH. Details: Clinical studies and meta-analyses in adults with NASH shows that taking vitamin E 800 IU daily for up to 24 months improves liver enzymes, hepatic fibrosis, steatosis, and lobular inflammation (14005,17517,97077,104413). Taking vitamin E 400-1200 IU in children with NASH also seems to improve liver enzyme levels after 4-10 months of treatment (89). Furthermore, a small study in patients with NASH shows that taking vitamin E 800 IU daily for 1 year seems to improve liver histology to a similar degree as taking telmisartan 40 mg daily (104405). In fact, practice guidelines by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommend taking vitamin E 800 IU daily as a first-line therapy in non-diabetic adults with biopsy-proven NASH. However, vitamin E isn't recommended in NASH patients with diabetes, cirrhosis, or cryptogenic cirrhosis (98130).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Oral vitamin E seems to improve PMS symptoms. Details: Clinical research in adults with PMS shows that taking vitamin E 400-600 IU daily for 3 cycles reduce subjective reports of symptoms, including anxiety, craving, and depression, when compared with placebo (4719,4720). Another small clinical study in Japanese patients with PMS shows that taking vitamin E, as gamma-tocopherol 180 mg, twice daily for 7 days during the luteal phase of 2 consecutive cycles reduces fatigue, irritability, and leg swelling when compared with placebo (112337).
• Tardive dyskinesia. Oral vitamin E might attenuate worsening of tardive dyskinesia in patients taking antipsychotic medications. Details: Small clinical studies suggest that taking vitamin E orally improves Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) scores in patients with tardive dyskinesia. It seems to be more effective in higher doses and in people who have had tardive dyskinesia for less than 5 years (3942,3943,3944,3945,3946,3948,85323). Both RRR-alpha-tocopherol (natural vitamin E) and unspecified forms were used in clinical trials. However, some conflicting findings have been reported. A meta-analysis suggests that vitamin E does not improve symptoms of tardive dyskinesia when compared with placebo; however, taking vitamin E seems to prevent the deterioration of symptoms when compared with placebo (97079).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral vitamin E does not seem to slow AMD progression. Details: Results from clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical trials show that vitamin E when taken alone or in combination with other antioxidants does not prevent the development (4667,7303,7304,34625) or progression of AMD (34633). In contrast, taking vitamin E 400 IU orally with elemental zinc 80 mg, vitamin C 500 mg, and beta-carotene 15 mg daily does seem to be beneficial. When taken for 5 years, this combination reduces visual acuity loss and reduces the risk of progression of AMD by 25% in patients with advanced AMD (7303,11326). A 10-year follow-up on this study confirmed these findings (90069). It is not known if this combination is beneficial for people with less advanced macular disease or for preventing AMD. Additionally, it is not clear if this benefit is due to vitamin E, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). Oral vitamin E does not seem to slow ALS progression. Details: Clinical research in patients with ALS shows that taking alpha-tocopherol 1490 IU daily for up to 12 months in addition to riluzole does not influence survival or motor function when compared with riluzole alone. However, these patients seem to be less likely to progress to a more severe disease state from a milder disease state (83180). Additionally, a large population study has found that dietary intake of vitamin E is not associated with risk of developing ALS (90087).
• Angina. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce angina symptoms. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin E orally may have some effect on endothelial dysfunction, but does not improve angina in nonsmokers or smokers, when compared with placebo (3896,4634,4649,4650,4651,4652).
• Atherosclerosis. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce atherosclerosis progression. Details: Taking RRR-alpha-tocopherol (natural vitamin E) orally does not appear to have any effect on atherosclerosis progression or mortality in patients with atherosclerosis when compared with placebo (3899,3936). However, there is preliminary evidence that a combination of vitamin E and vitamin C might help prevent the progression of atherosclerosis in men, particularly smokers and cardiac transplant patients (1918).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce eczema symptoms. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin E 600 IU in combination with selenium daily for 12 weeks does not improve symptoms of atopic eczema when compared with placebo or selenium alone (74456). Also, while some clinical research shows that taking 600 IU of all-rac-alpha-tocopherol (synthetic vitamin E) daily for 60 days with vitamin D 1600 IU improves overall atopic dermatitis symptoms, pruritus, and erythema when compared with placebo, taking vitamin E alone does not seem to have this effect. However, vitamin E alone does improve hard, leathery skin symptoms and dryness when compared with placebo (84491).
• Breast cancer-related hot flashes. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce hot flashes related to breast cancer. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin E 800 IU daily for 4 weeks does not reduce hot flashes in females who have had breast cancer when compared with placebo (454).
• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce the risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature infants. Details: Clinical research in premature infants weighing less than 1500 grams at birth shows that taking vitamin E orally does not prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia when compared with placebo (4657,85062).
• Cataracts. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce cataract risk. Details: Some population research has found that dietary and supplemental vitamin E intake is associated with a reduced risk of developing age-related cataracts (4208,4663,4665,4759). However, other population research has not found this association (2395,4664,92902). Additionally, higher quality evidence from clinical trials and a meta-analysis consistently shows that vitamin E, taken alone or with other vitamins, does not prevent the progression of age-related cataracts or decrease vision loss when compared with control (4666,7304,34626). However, a meta-analysis of observational research suggests that higher dietary intake of vitamin E is weakly associated with a 27% reduction in the odds of developing cataracts when compared with low dietary intake of vitamin E (112095).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce peripheral neuropathy due to chemotherapy. Details: Although some small, low-quality clinical studies and a meta-analysis of these studies suggest that vitamin E 600 mg daily for 3 months might be beneficial for preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy induced by cisplatin, carboplatin, or oxaliplatin when compared with placebo (10366,85117,90072), these studies have found no effect with lower doses of vitamin E or in those receiving paclitaxel chemotherapy (107862). In addition to the low methodological quality of the studies, the validity of these finding is limited by high heterogeneity, as the studies included patients with several different cancer types. Also, a large, high-quality clinical study shows that taking vitamin E 400 mg daily is not beneficial for preventing peripheral neuropathy induced by taxanes or platinum analogues when compared with placebo (101457). The American Society of Clinical Oncology does not recommend the use of vitamin E for the prevention or management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (101434).
• Colorectal cancer. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce colorectal cancer risk. Details: Some population research has found that intake of vitamin E and multivitamins is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer (1047). Some preliminary clinical research also shows that taking vitamin E orally in combination with other vitamins might have a protective effect in patients with a history of colorectal adenomas (3954,3956,92903). However, higher quality evidence from larger clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research consistently show that taking vitamin E supplements alone, or in combination with other vitamins, does not prevent colorectal cancer incidence or recurrence when compared with control (3953,3955,3957,12185,13036,13131,34594,90361). Despite this conflicting research, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2009 regarding vitamin E and colorectal cancer risk. However, the FDA has determined that it is highly unlikely that vitamin E supplements reduce the risk of colorectal cancer (102332).
• Congestive heart failure (CHF). Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce CHF symptoms or prevent CHF development. Details: Clinical research in adults with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV heart failure shows that taking vitamin E (RRR- α tocopherol) 500 IU orally daily for 12 weeks does not improve prognostic or functional indices of CHF or quality of life measurements when compared with placebo (3906). Additionally, population research shows that taking vitamin E 600 IU every other day does not affect the risk of developing heart failure in healthy females 45 years or older when compared with placebo (90068).
• Head and neck cancer. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce the risk of head and neck cancer recurrence. In fact, it might increase recurrence risk. Details: A large clinical trial in patients with stage I or II head and neck cancer shows that taking all-rac-alpha-tocopherol (synthetic vitamin E) 400 IU daily, during radiation therapy and for 3 years after the end of radiation therapy, does not reduce the risk of recurrence of the first tumor or development of a second primary tumor when compared with placebo. In fact, there is some concern that patients taking vitamin E seem to have an increased risk of tumor recurrence or a second primary tumor when compared with patients taking placebo (13055). Advise patients with head and neck cancer to avoid taking vitamin E supplements in doses of 400 IU/day or more.
• Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Oral vitamin E during pregnancy does not seem to reduce IUGR risk. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin E along with other ingredients throughout pregnancy does not reduce the risk for IUGR when compared with placebo (97075).
• Liver disease. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce liver disease-associated mortality. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin E does not reduce all-cause-or liver related-mortality or morbidity in patients with liver diseases, including autoimmune liver diseases, viral hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, or cirrhosis (34608). Additional clinical research in male smokers over 50 years old shows that taking vitamin E 75 IU orally, alone or with beta-carotene 20 mg orally, daily for 5-8 years does not reduce the risk of mortality due to chronic liver disease when compared with placebo (91383).
• Oral leukoplakia. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce the risk for oral leukoplakia in male smokers. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (3951,4708), the largest randomized controlled trial indicates that supplementation with all-rac-alpha-tocopherol (synthetic vitamin E) 55.6 IU daily for 5-7 years has no effect on the incidence of oral lesions in male cigarette smokers when compared with placebo (3951).
• Osteoarthritis. Oral vitamin E does not seem to be beneficial for osteoarthritis treatment or prevention. Details: Taking vitamin E 500 IU daily for 6 months does not seem to decrease symptoms of pain or stiffness in patients with osteoarthritis when compared with placebo (5264). Additional clinical research show that taking vitamin E 500 IU daily for up to 2 years does not slow cartilage loss when compared with placebo (13066). Population research has shown that taking vitamin E supplements does not reduce the risk of developing osteoarthritis or slow the progression of existing osteoarthritis (5881).
• Pancreatic cancer. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce pancreatic cancer risk. Details: Taking vitamin E supplements alone or in combination with other antioxidants such as beta-carotene and vitamin C does not reduce the risk of developing pancreatic cancer (12185,85147). Taking all-rac-alpha-tocopherol (synthetic vitamin E) 55.6 IU daily for 5 to 8 years also does not seem to reduce the incidence of or mortality from carcinoma of the pancreas in male smokers (3961).
• Parkinson disease. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce Parkinson disease symptoms or progression, although the risk of developing the disease may decrease with increased dietary vitamin E intake. Details: Observational research has found that dietary vitamin E intake might be associated with a decreased occurrence of Parkinson disease (4712). A meta-analysis of 12 studies evaluating the risk of developing Parkinson disease has found that the highest daily intake of vitamin E is associated with a 20% lower risk than those with the lowest intake (107858). However, clinical research in patients with stage I or II Parkinson disease shows that taking all-rac-alpha-tocopherol (synthetic vitamin E) 2000 IU daily for up to 24 months doesn't seem to have any benefit when compared with baseline or control (4709,4710,4711,85318).
• Pharyngeal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin E reduces the risk of developing cancer of the pharynx. Details: A sub-group analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (The HOPE Trial) in patients with diabetes or cardiovascular disease suggests that taking RRR-alpha-tocopherol (natural vitamin E) 400 IU daily for about 7 years is not linked with a reduced risk of developing oral or pharyngeal cancer when compared with placebo (13036).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce pre-eclampsia risk. Details: The majority of clinical research shows that taking a combination of vitamins E and C, at the same doses, does not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia in low-, moderate-, or high-risk patients, when compared with placebo or no treatment. Also, the risk of gestational hypertension might increase in some cases, although results are inconsistent (83312,83356,83383,83472,83474,97075,97059). Other researchers using vitamin E in combination with vitamin C and allopurinol beginning at 24-32 weeks gestation found the combination similar to placebo (4718). However, some clinical research suggests that taking a combination of vitamin E 400 IU and vitamin C 1000 mg daily reduces the risk of proteinuric hypertension in high-risk patients when started in weeks 16-22 of pregnancy (3236).
• Preterm labor. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce risk for premature labor. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin E along with other ingredients throughout pregnancy does not reduce the risk for preterm labor when compared with placebo (97075).
• Prostate cancer. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce the risk of prostate cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of over 30 large clinical trials and observational studies shows that neither dietary nor supplemental vitamin E reduces the risk of prostate cancer when compared with a control (112159). However, individual study results are mixed. Population research on the use of dietary or supplemental vitamin E intake for prostate cancer risk reduction is conflicting (12872,14124,12873,15607). Although one large-scale study in smokers found that taking 55.6 IU daily of all-rac-alpha-tocopherol (synthetic vitamin E) reduced the risk of prostate cancer and mortality (3959,11303), most large-scale randomized, controlled trials show that vitamin E is not beneficial. A sub-group analysis of a large-scale clinical study (The HOPE trial) in patients with diabetes or cardiovascular disease suggests that taking 400 IU of RRR-alpha-tocopherol (natural vitamin E) daily for about 7 years is not linked with a decreased risk of developing prostate cancer when compared with placebo (13036). Another large scale study (Physician's Health Study II) shows that taking vitamin E 400 IU every other day for an average of 8 years does not reduce the risk of prostate cancer when compared with placebo (16708,90097). Similarly, another large clinical study (The SU.VI.MAX study) shows that a combination of vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) 44.7 IU, vitamin C 120 mg, beta-carotene 6 mg, selenium 100 mcg, and zinc 20 mg daily for an average of 8 years does not reduce the risk of prostate cancer overall when compared with placebo (14135). A fourth large-scale clinical trial (The SELECT trial) in men over the age of 50 years shows that taking all-rac-alpha-tocopherol (synthetic vitamin E) 400 IU daily, alone or in combination with selenium 200 mcg daily, for an average of about 5.5 years does not reduce prostate cancer risk when compared with placebo (16707). Also, an extension of this initial study found that taking vitamin E alone was associated with a 17% increased of developing prostate cancer (17688).
• Respiratory tract infections. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce respiratory infections in most patients. However, there's some evidence that it might reduce incidence of the common cold in patients living in long-term care facilities. Details: Taking oral vitamin E 298 IU daily, alone or in supplemental multivitamin form, does not appear to decrease the incidence, duration, or severity of upper or lower respiratory infections in elderly persons when compared with placebo (10788,12094). However, some research shows that taking vitamin E reduces the incidence of the common cold in elderly long-term care patients when compared with placebo (12094). More evidence is needed to determine how effective vitamin E might be for reducing the incidence of the common cold.
• Retinitis pigmentosa. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce retinitis pigmentosa and related visual decline. Details: Taking all-rac-alpha-tocopherol (synthetic vitamin E) orally does not appear to slow visual decline is people with retinitis pigmentosa and has been associated with more rapid loss of visual acuity, although the validity of the study with these findings has been questioned (83,84,85,86,87,88).
• Scarring. Topical vitamin E does not seem to improve scar appearance. Details: Some clinical research shows that applying ointment containing vitamin E topically does not reduce surgical wound scarring when compared with a placebo ointment (4721,4722).
• Stillbirth. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce risk of a stillborn baby. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin E along with other ingredients during pregnancy does not reduce the risk for stillbirth when compared with placebo (97075).

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral vitamin E does not reduce breast cancer risk. Details: Some evidence suggests that higher serum levels of vitamin E might be associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (10132). However, increasing vitamin E intake from the diet or supplements does not seem to reduce the risk of developing breast cancer (4658,4659,85147,112334). Also, a large-scale randomized trial in patients with diabetes or cardiovascular disease shows that patients who take 400 IU of RRR-alpha-tocopherol (natural vitamin E) daily do not have a reduced risk of developing breast cancer (13036). In other large-scale studies, females who take RRR-alpha-tocopherol (natural vitamin E) 600 IU every other day for up to 10 years also do not have a lower risk of developing breast cancer (13131,34580).
• Cancer. Oral vitamin E does not reduce the risk of cancer in most patients. Details: Some research suggests that a combination of vitamin E 44.7 IU daily with vitamin C, beta-carotene, selenium, and zinc does not lower the overall risk of cancer, although it might reduce the risk of cancer when only males are evaluated (14109). However, clinical research from a large scale study (Physician's Health Study II) shows that taking vitamin E 400 IU every other day for an average of 8 years does not reduce the overall risk of cancer in males when compared with placebo (16708,90097). Also, clinical research published in a meta-analysis shows that taking vitamin E does not reduce the overall risk of cancer (85147). In 2003, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding antioxidant vitamins, such as vitamin E and overall cancer risk. However, the FDA has determined that the evidence is limited and inconclusive (102334). The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) states that there is no net benefit to supplementation with vitamin E for the prevention of cancer in general and therefore recommends against its use (108641,112166).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Most evidence shows that oral vitamin E does not reduce the risk for CVD events or complications. Details: Most clinical research in various populations shows that taking vitamin E supplements orally is not effective for preventing heart disease or adverse cardiovascular outcomes such as myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, hospitalizations for unstable angina, morbidity, or cardiovascular death (12492,12493,13036,14108,66140,83050,85084,85224). The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) states that there is no net benefit to supplementation with vitamin E for the prevention of CVD in general and therefore recommends against its use (108641,112166). With few exceptions (3357,3936), large-scale controlled clinical trials show that vitamin E supplements offer no benefit for primary prevention in healthy or high-risk patients (3907,3935,3937,13036,13131), or for secondary prevention of heart disease and cardiovascular events such as MI, stroke, and death (3896,3899,13036). While one analysis of clinical research found that in mostly healthy patients 70 years or younger without CVD, vitamin E supplementation reduces the risk of cardiovascular mortality, the authors performed more than 20 statistical tests and did not adjust for multiple comparisons. Therefore, it possible that the positive effect was due to chance. This analysis was also limited because it excluded adults older than 70 years of age and adults that are more likely to suffer an exacerbation from a chronic condition. Furthermore, the analysis showed that vitamin E supplementation does not reduce the risk of all-cause mortality or the risk of CVD compared with placebo or no intervention (97078). There's additional conflicting evidence. One large-scale trial shows that healthy females who take RRR-alpha-tocopherol (natural vitamin E) 600 IU every other day for up to 10 years also do not have a lower risk of major cardiovascular events but might have a 24% lower risk of cardiovascular death when compared with placebo (13131). This finding is contradictory to previous findings. One notable limitation of this trial is a lack of systematic assessment of the use of statins or other cardiovascular therapies by the participants throughout the 10-year period. Meta-analyses of clinical trials involving patients with type 2 diabetes and the haptoglobin 2-2 genotype show that taking vitamin E, up to 600 IU daily for up to 8 years, reduces the incidence of non-fatal myocardial infarction and death due to CVD (85179,85221). Because these meta-analyses included only specific patients, the generalizability of the results is questionable. There is debate about whether some forms of vitamin E might work differently than others. Some people suggest that RRR-alpha-tocopherol (natural vitamin E) is more effective than all-rac-alpha-tocopherol (synthetic vitamin E). This has not been verified by studies. A meta-analysis of vitamin E studies indicates that there is no significant difference in cardiovascular outcomes based on the form of vitamin E used (13132). The FDA has refused to allow labeling claims for vitamin E supplements for prevention of CVD (3939). A Science Advisory from the American Heart Association also states that the evidence doesn't justify use of antioxidants such as vitamin E for reducing the risk of CVD (12142). Advise patients not to rely on vitamin E supplements for preventing heart disease.
• Fetal and premature infant mortality. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce death in preterm infants. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking vitamin E throughout pregnancy does not affect morbidity or mortality in preterm infants when compared with placebo (85074,97075).
• Fibrocystic breast disease. Oral vitamin E does not improve fibrocystic breast disease in most patients. Details: Clinical research shows that taking alpha-tocopherol 150 IU, 300 IU, or 600 IU daily for 2-3 months does not improve subjective or objective measures of fibrocystic breast disease when compared with placebo (4660,4661,4662).
• Lung cancer. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce lung cancer risk. Details: Taking all-rac-alpha-tocopherol (synthetic vitamin E) 55.6 IU daily for 5-8 years is not associated with a lower risk of developing lung cancer for male smokers (3949). A sub-group analysis of a large scale clinical trial in patients with diabetes or cardiovascular disease who take RRR-alpha-tocopherol (natural vitamin E) 400 IU daily for about 7 years do not have a lower risk of developing lung cancer when compared with placebo (13036). In another large-scale study, females who take RRR-alpha-tocopherol (natural vitamin E) 600 IU every other day for up to 10 years also do not have a lower risk of developing lung cancer (13131). Meta-analyses of clinical research suggest taking vitamin E as alpha-tocopherol for up to approximately 10 years does not prevent lung cancer or reduce the incidence of lung cancer mortality when compared with placebo (34632,85147). However, a large epidemiological cancer screening trial with a mean follow-up of over 12 years suggests that higher dietary intake of vitamin E, but not total intake or supplementation with vitamin E, is associated with a modest reduction in development of lung cancer (112096).
• Overall mortality. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce the risk of mortality from all causes. Details: Although some population research suggests that increased dietary vitamin E intake is associated with reduced overall mortality (98260), most meta-analyses of clinical research in adults show that taking vitamin E supplements for at least 1 year does not affect all-cause mortality (34622,85164,85200). Furthermore, when only high quality clinical trials were analyzed, mortality was increased by 3% in adults taking vitamin E when compared with control (34622).
• Prematurity. Oral vitamin E does not seem to reduce the risk of premature birth and complications. Details: Clinical research shows that vitamin E does not improve blood parameters or prevent the development of anemia in premature infants (4648,10362). One clinical study in premature infants weighing less than 1500 grams at birth shows that giving vitamin E 25 IU daily for six weeks does not improve hemoglobin concentration, reticulocyte counts, or platelet counts when compared with placebo (4648). Another clinical study in premature infants weighing less than 1250 grams at birth shows that giving vitamin E 50 IU daily for eight weeks does not increase the response to erythropoietin and iron when compared with placebo (10362).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Aging skin. Topical vitamin E has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in Asian females aged 30-65 years shows that applying a specific liquid product, (Antioxidant and Collagen Booster Serum, Max Biocare Pty Ltd.) containing vitamin E 1%, vitamin C 20%, and red raspberry leaf cell culture extract 0.0005%, to the face nightly for 8 weeks, in addition to regular facial skin products, improves skin color, elasticity, radiance, smoothness, and appearance of wrinkles when compared with regular facial skin products alone (102355).
• Aluminum phosphide poisoning. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial in the management of aluminum phosphide poisoning. Details: A small clinical study in patients in Iran admitted to the intensive care unit with aluminum phosphide poisoning shows that administering vitamin E 400 mg intramuscularly twice daily reduces malondialdehyde levels, mechanical ventilation duration, and mortality when compared with supportive care alone (114119).
• Anemia of chronic disease. Small clinical studies suggest that oral vitamin E might improve response to anemia treatment in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Details: Two small studies in adults and children on chronic hemodialysis have shown improved response to erythropoietin with vitamin E supplementation (4640,4647). In one study, children given vitamin E 22.4 IU/kg in combination with erythropoietin had significantly increased hemoglobin and hematocrit levels after 2 weeks of combination treatment, compared with eight and five weeks in patients receiving erythropoietin alone (4640). In a study of adults, concurrent supplementation with vitamin E 745 IU daily allowed dose reductions of erythropoietin from an average of 93 U/kg/week to 74 U/kg/week with the same resultant hemoglobin levels (4647).
• Anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Oral vitamin E has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy shows that taking vitamin E 600 mg three times daily and L-carnitine 3000 mg by intravenous infusion on day 1 followed by 300 mg by mouth four times daily thereafter for 3 weeks reduced the risk of cardiovascular events by 63% and improved laboratory markers of cardiotoxicity when compared with chemotherapy alone (112338). It is unclear if these findings are due to vitamin E, L-carnitine, or the combination.
• Anxiety. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial in patients with anxiety. Details: A meta-analysis of 5 mostly small clinical studies in patients without anxiety shows that taking vitamin E 200-400 IU daily for up to 10 weeks does not improve anxiety symptom scores when compared with placebo (112158). It is unclear if these findings can be generalized to patients with anxiety disorders.
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial for asthma treatment or prevention. Details: There is inconsistent evidence about the role of vitamin E in asthma. Some population research has found that increased dietary intake of vitamin E is associated with a lower risk of asthma; however taking vitamin E supplements are not associated with decreased risk (6058,15006). Low vitamin E intake also appears to be associated with an increased risk of asthma (315,401,422). A small clinical study in children with asthma suggests that adding vitamin E 74.5 IU by mouth daily to fluticasone treatment for 8 weeks may decrease cough, wheezing, and dyspnea when compared with baseline (90077). This study was limited because it did not compare the vitamin E intervention to the control group.
• Atopic disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin E reduces the risk of atopic disease in infants. Details: Population research has found that increased maternal vitamin E intake isn't associated with decreased odds of developing eczema, food allergy, wheeze, allergic sensitization, or any allergic disease in infants (90098).
• Bladder cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin E reduces bladder cancer risk. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that the highest intake of vitamin E is associated with a reduced risk for bladder cancer when compared to the lowest intake in patients followed for more than 10 years. This benefit was not seen in those followed for less than 10 years. This effect appears to be dose-dependent, although it is not clear how much vitamin E intake is required to reduce bladder cancer risk. Additionally, it is not clear whether this benefit differs for dietary or supplemental intake of vitamin E (101435). Population research also suggests that regular use of vitamin E supplements for more than 10 years is associated with a reduced risk of bladder cancer mortality; however, use for less than 10 years is not associated with reduced mortality (9839). In 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding vitamin E and bladder cancer risk. However, the FDA has determined that it is highly unlikely that vitamin E supplements reduce the risk of bladder cancer (102332). A moderate-sized clinical study in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer shows that taking vitamin E 200 IU orally daily for an average of 1.5 years increases the risk of recurrence, but not progression or death, when compared with placebo (114116).
• Burns. It is unclear if topical vitamin E is beneficial for healing of burn wounds. Details: A small clinical study in patients with moderate and deep burn wounds (25% to 67%) shows that applying a specific alpha-tocopherol product (Filme Olio) daily seems to reduce infection and improve healing when compared with usual treatment (104407).
• Carpal tunnel syndrome. Oral vitamin E has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome shows that taking a combination product containing vitamin E, alpha-lipoic acid, acetyl-L-carnitine, and other ingredients orally twice daily for 60 days reduces symptom severity and pain, but does not improve measures of hand and wrist function, when compared with control (111702). It is unclear if this effect is due to vitamin E, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Chemotherapy-related infection. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial in patients with infection due to chemotherapy. Details: Observational research suggests that greater dietary intake of vitamin E may lower the incidence of infection in children undergoing chemotherapy for lymphoblastic leukemia (11997).
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there is interest in using oral vitamin E for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin E for this condition.
• Cisplatin-associated ototoxicity. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial for preventing ototoxicity due to cisplatin. Details: A small clinical study in patients receiving cisplatin for solid tumors shows that taking a specific vitamin E supplement (Rigentex, Bracco) as alpha-tocopherol 400 IU daily for 3 months attenuates hearing loss when compared with placebo (97082).
• Colistin-induced nephrotoxicity. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial for preventing nephrotoxicity due to colistin. Details: A small clinical study in patients receiving colistin therapy shows that taking vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) 400 IU orally daily for the duration of colistin therapy does not reduce the incidence or duration of acute kidney injury when compared with colistin alone (107867).
• Contrast induced nephropathy. It is unclear if oral or intravenous vitamin E is beneficial in patients with nephropathy due to contrast dye. Details: A small clinical study in patients receiving elective computer-assisted tomography with nonionic radiocontrast agents shows that receiving vitamin E 3218 IU emulsion in 0.45% saline intravenously infused at the rate of 1 mL/kg/hr over 24 hours does not decrease the risk of contrast agent-induced nephropathy when compared with normal saline alone (90081). However, oral vitamin E may modestly reduce the risk of contrast induced nephropathy. A clinical trial shows that taking vitamin E as alpha-tocopherol 522 IU or gamma-tocopherol 447 IU orally daily, starting 5 days prior to the procedure and continuing 2 days post-procedure, results in a 9% to 10% lower incidence of contrast induced acute kidney injury when compared with standard treatment with normal saline (90096). Another clinical study shows that taking a single dose of vitamin E 1490 IU orally before elective coronary angiography reduces the risk of contrast induced kidney injury by 7% when compared with placebo (97074).
• Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial for recovery after CABG. Details: When taking vitamin E orally with vitamin C and allopurinol two days prior to CABG and one day postoperatively, patients had fewer perioperative infarctions and lower creatine kinase-MB release (4699); however, this benefit was not found when using vitamin E alone or in combination with vitamin C without allopurinol (4697,4698). Other clinical research in patients undergoing elective CABG surgery in Iran shows that taking vitamin E 1200 IU and zinc 120 mg orally the day before surgery and vitamin E 200 IU and zinc 30 mg orally daily for 3 weeks after the surgery reduces hospital length of stay by approximately 2 days when compared with placebo (114118). It is unclear if this effect is due to vitamin E, zinc, or the combination. Additionally, the generalizability of this result is limited by the single-center study design and inclusion of only lower risk patients.
• Critical illness (trauma). An analysis of several small clinical studies suggests that oral or intravenous vitamin E is not beneficial in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Details: A meta-analysis of 5 small clinical studies in patients admitted to the ICU shows that administration of oral or intravenous vitamin E 400-3000 IU daily for up to 4 weeks does not decrease the length of hospital or ICU stay or reduce the risk of mortality when compared with control (112335). The validity of these findings is limited by a high degree of heterogeneity among the studies, which included differences in vitamin E dosing, duration of therapy, and reasons for ICU admission.
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial for dementia prevention; the available research is conflicting. Details: A longitudinal cohort study in Japanese adults aged 40 years or older at baseline who were followed for a median of about 20 years, shows that total daily dietary intake of vitamin E is inversely associated with the risk of developing dementia, with a hazard ratio of about 0.8 for the highest compared with lowest quartiles of intake (107857). In a longitudinal cohort study of males aged 71-93 years, consuming supplemental vitamin E and vitamin C decreased the risk of developing vascular and mixed or other dementias; however, there was no protective effect for Alzheimer dementia (4636). Evidence from clinical research that evolved into an observational study shows that taking vitamin E 400 IU daily does not decrease the incidence of dementia in males 60 years or older (93570). However, the results from this study are limited by selection bias due to the high education levels and relatively young age of the participants, limitations with case ascertainment, and problems with follow-up (93570,93571). Also, these studies did not distinguish between different forms of vitamin E (4636,93570).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial in patients with depression. Details: A meta-analysis of 7 mostly small clinical studies in patients without major depressive disorder shows that taking vitamin E 400-2000 IU daily for up to 6 months modestly improves depression symptom scores when compared with placebo (112158). It is unclear if these findings can be generalized to patients with depression.
• Developmental coordination disorder (DCD). Oral vitamin E has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients for DCD; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD), also known as dyspraxia, shows that taking vitamin E orally, in combination with evening primrose oil, thyme oil, and fish oils, for 4 months seems to improve movement when compared with control (5708). The effects of vitamin E alone on DCD are unclear.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of diabetes. Details: Population research has found that higher vitamin E dietary intake is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes (14004). However, individual clinical studies in patients with existing diabetes show mixed results (13496,13497,90095,90099,98259). A meta-analysis of 36 small clinical studies in patients with diabetes suggests that vitamin E may slightly improve some measures of glycemic control. In patients with type 2 diabetes, vitamin E seems to reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by around 0.2% and improve insulin resistance, but not fasting blood glucose, when compared with placebo. In patients with type 1 diabetes, vitamin E seems to reduce HbA1c by around 0.8%, but does not improve fasting blood glucose, when compared with placebo (112161). The validity of this analysis is limited by a high degree of heterogeneity across the studies, including differences in vitamin E dose, treatment duration, concomitant medications, patient populations, and study designs.
• Diabetic foot ulcers. Oral vitamin E has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients for diabetic foot ulcers; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults with a grade 3 diabetic foot ulcer shows that taking vitamin E 400 IU and magnesium oxide 250 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces ulcer length, width, and depth when compared with placebo (101436). A small clinical study in adults with non-healing diabetic foot ulcers being treated with a platelet-rich plasma fibrin glue dressing shows that taking vitamin E 200 IU and vitamin C 12.5 mg orally twice daily for 8 weeks increases the rate of ulcer healing when compared with placebo. In those receiving vitamins, 46% of wounds closed completely, compared with 17% of those receiving placebo (107870). It is not clear if the effects seen in these studies are due to vitamin E, the other nutrients, or the combinations.
• Diabetic nephropathy. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial in patients with diabetes and impaired kidney function. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in adults with diabetic nephropathy shows that taking vitamin E 600-1200 mg daily, alone or with other antioxidants, modestly reduces urinary albumin excretion when compared with placebo or no treatment, but seems to have no effect on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (97069). A small clinical study in patients with diabetic nephropathy shows that taking a specific tocotrienol-rich vitamin E supplement (Tocovid SupraBio, Hovid Nutriworld) 200 mg twice daily for 12 weeks seems to modestly reduce serum creatinine, with a corresponding increase in GFR, when compared with placebo. According to a sub-group analysis, these improvements remain statistically significant in patients with low tocopherol levels (less than 42 mcmol/L) at baseline, but not in those with higher levels at baseline (103010). Another small clinical study shows that taking this same supplement regimen for 12 months reduces serum creatinine levels and improves GFR at 8 months, but not 12 months, when compared with placebo. In a subgroup analysis of patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease, these benefits persisted at 12 months when compared with placebo (107390).
• Diabetic neuropathy. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial for improving diabetic neuropathy symptoms. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes and neuropathy shows that taking a specific vitamin E supplement (Evion) 400 IU daily for 12 weeks modestly decreases neuropathic pain scores when compared to baseline (90091). Another very small clinical trial shows that taking vitamin E 1341 IU daily for 6 months improves nerve conduction in diabetic neuropathy when compared with placebo (4724).
• Down syndrome. Oral vitamin E does not seem to slow cognitive decline in patients with this condition. Details: A clinical study in patients over 50 years old with Down syndrome shows that taking vitamin E 1000 IU twice daily for 3 years does not slow cognitive decline when compared with placebo (97076).
• Endometriosis. Oral vitamin E has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with endometriosis and pelvic pain shows that taking vitamin E 800 IU and vitamin C 1000 mg daily for 8 weeks improves dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain scores when compared with placebo (106622).
• Extravasation. Topical vitamin E has only been evaluated in combination with dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO); its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in patients receiving chemotherapy shows that applying vitamin E topically, in combination with DMSO, seems to prevent skin ulceration after chemotherapy extravasation (4668).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial for preventing gastric cancer or reducing associated mortality. Details: Population studies have found that increasing dietary vitamin E intake by 22.4 IU daily is associated with a 21% decreased risk of gastric cancer (3360,90083). However, clinical trials have not found that vitamin E supplements reduce gastric cancer risk (3960,4676,4677,12185). Studies evaluating vitamin E in combination with other supplements have been inconsistent. In one large-scale clinical trial a specific combination of vitamin E 100 IU with selenium 37.5 mcg and vitamin C 250 mg twice daily for about 7 years did not reduce risk of gastric cancer in patients from Shandong Province in China where there is a very high prevalence of gastric cancer (14447,90085). In another large-scale clinical study of 29,584 people in China, the combination of oral vitamin E, beta-carotene, and selenium over 5 years did reduce total mortality, total cancer mortality, and stomach cancer mortality (4679). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin E plus beta-carotene with or without vitamin C does not reduce gastric cancer incidence (12185).
• Glomerulosclerosis. It is unclear if oral vitamin E reduces proteinuria due to glomerulosclerosis in children. Details: A very small clinical study in children with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis who are refractory to standard medical management shows that taking vitamin E 200 IU daily orally might reduce proteinuria when compared with baseline (4675). The validity of this finding is limited by a lack of control group.
• Granuloma annulare. Although there is interest in using topical vitamin E for granuloma annulare, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin E for this condition.
• Helicobacter pylori. Oral vitamin E has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A clinical study in patients with Helicobacter pylori dyspepsia without ulcers shows that taking vitamin E 200 IU and vitamin C 500 mg by mouth twice daily for 30 days in addition to standard triple therapy increases eradication rates by 37% when compared with triple therapy alone (90094). It is not clear if this benefit is due to vitamin E, vitamin C, or the combination.
• Huntington disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin E improves Huntington disease symptoms. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking RRR-alpha-tocopherol (natural vitamin E) might improve symptoms in patients with early Huntington disease, but this benefit is not seen in patients with more advanced disease when compared with placebo (4686).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial for hypertension. Details: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in adults with hypertension shows that taking vitamin E 200-400 IU orally daily for 2-27 weeks substantially lowers systolic blood pressure, but not diastolic blood pressure, when compared with control (113668). The validity of these results is limited by high heterogeneity. Other preliminary clinical research in patients with hypertension who are receiving conventional treatment shows that taking vitamin E 300 mg daily orally for 3-4 years does not lower blood pressure when compared with control (5210).
• IgA nephropathy. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial for IgA nephropathy in children. Details: A small clinical study in children with IgA nephropathy shows that taking vitamin E (400 IU for those weighing less than 30 kg; 800 IU for those weighing more than 30 kg) improves urinary protein to creatinine ratio, but not glomerular filtration rate, creatinine clearance, or hematuria, when compared with placebo (85063).
• Infertility. It is unclear if oral vitamin E improves pregnancy rates in females with infertility of unknown cause. Details: A small clinical study in females experiencing implantation failure shows that taking vitamin E 400 IU daily for 12 weeks improves endometrial thickness when compared with placebo (99852). However, an observational study suggests that there is no association between dietary vitamin E intake and in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes including good oocyte quality, embryo transfer success rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and successful term pregnancy rates in subfertile couples who are candidates for IVF (112097). Vitamin E has also been studied in combination with selenium. In a small clinical study in patients with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), taking vitamin E 400 IU with selenium 200 mcg orally daily for 90 days increases anti-Mullerian hormone index, antral follicle count, and mean ovarian volume after 12 months of follow-up when compared with placebo (107866). It is unclear if these improvements correlate to higher pregnancy or live birth rates.
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although there is interest in using oral vitamin E for IBD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin E for this condition.
• Insomnia. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial in patients with insomnia. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in postmenopausal patients with chronic insomnia shows that taking vitamin E 400 IU daily for 1 month improves sleep quality ratings and reduces the need for sedative medications when compared with placebo (112163).
• Intermittent claudication. It is unclear if oral vitamin E improves intermittent claudication symptoms. Details: A large clinical study in male smokers with intermittent claudication shows that taking all-rac-alpha-tocopherol (synthetic vitamin E) 50 mg orally daily for about 3.7 years does not appear to have any effect when used alone or in combination with beta-carotene for treating symptoms or disease progression when compared with placebo (4732). However, according to poor-quality clinical research included in a meta-analysis, taking vitamin E 447-2384 IU daily for up to 18 months appears to reduce symptoms of intermittent claudication (85023).
• Lice. Topical synthetic vitamin E might be beneficial for head lice eradication. Details: A small clinical study in children and adults with head lice shows that topical application of a specific tocopheryl acetate 20% spray (LiceKO, Panin SRL) once, and then again 7 days later, is more effective for eliminating lice when compared with permethrin 1% cream rinse (90067).
• Male infertility. An analysis of several small, low-quality clinical studies suggests that oral vitamin E might improve pregnancy rates and measures of sperm health in males with infertility. Details: Several small clinical studies in males with infertility show conflicting results (3583,4695,107865). However, a meta-analysis of 7 small, low-quality clinical trials shows that taking vitamin E 300-600 IU for 12-48 weeks increases pregnancy rates by 86% and modestly improves sperm count, concentration, motility, and vitality, but does not seem to increase semen volume, when compared with a control (109461). Vitamin E has also been used in combination with other nutrients with unclear results. Small studies show that taking vitamin E 800 mg daily with vitamin C 1000 mg daily for 8 weeks doesn't seem to improve sperm functionality (4696), while vitamin E 400 IU plus selenium 200 mcg daily for at least 100 days improves sperm functionality, but not fertilization rates, when compared with baseline (3585). In another small clinical study in infertile males undergoing varicocelectomy, taking vitamin E 400 IU, selenium 200 mcg, and folic acid 5 mg daily for 6 months improved sperm count and motility when compared with control (102968). Another small clinical study shows that taking vitamin E 100 mg and coenzyme Q10 10 mg three times daily for 3 months modestly increases levels of testosterone and improves progressive sperm motility and morphology when compared to baseline. However, taking an L-carnitine nutrient complex 15 grams twice daily was more effective for increasing testosterone and improving sperm parameters (109390). However, it is unclear if any of these combination therapies increases live birth rates.
• Melanoma. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial for reducing melanoma risk. Details: A sub-group analysis of a large-scale clinical trial in patients with diabetes or cardiovascular disease suggests that taking RRR-alpha-tocopherol (natural vitamin E) 400 IU daily for about 7 years is not linked with a reduced risk of developing melanoma when compared with placebo (13036).
• Menopausal symptoms. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial for reducing menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes. Details: A small clinical study in postmenopausal patients shows that taking vitamin E 200 IU twice daily for 8 weeks reduces hot flashes, but does not affect other menopausal symptoms or anxiety, when compared with placebo. The improvement in hot flashes was no longer present 4 weeks after the intervention (102969). However, a meta-analysis of 3 small clinical studies in postmenopausal patients, including the study above, shows that taking vitamin E 400 IU daily for 8 weeks does not reduce hot flash frequency when compared with placebo (111460).
• Methotrexate toxicity. It is unclear if oral vitamin E reduces the risk of liver toxicity due to methotrexate. Details: An observational study in patients taking methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis has found that taking vitamin E 400 mg twice daily for 3 months is associated with reductions in serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) and serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) levels when compared with no supplementation. This suggests a reduction in liver injury in the treatment group (104414).
• Muscular dystrophy. Small clinical studies suggest that oral vitamin E may not improve muscular dystrophy symptoms or progression. Details: Small clinical studies in patients with myotonic or Duchenne muscular dystrophy show that taking vitamin E along with penicillamine or selenium doesn't appear to slow disease progression or improve symptoms when compared with placebo (4703,4704).
• Nocturnal leg cramps. It is unclear if oral vitamin E reduces leg cramps in veterans or in patients on hemodialysis. Details: A small clinical study in adults undergoing hemodialysis shows that taking vitamin E 400 IU at bedtime for 2 months seems to reduce the frequency of nocturnal leg cramps when compared with placebo (4701). However, another small clinical study in male veterans shows that taking vitamin E 800 IU at bedtime for 4 weeks does not reduce cramp frequency or severity or reduce sleep disturbances when compared with placebo (4702).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial in adults or children with NAFLD. Details: One meta-analysis of studies assessing both NAFLD patients and patients in whom NAFLD progressed to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) shows that taking vitamin E 100-800 IU daily for 1-24 months improves liver enzyme levels, hepatic steatosis, and lobular inflammation when compared with control. However, taking vitamin E does not appear to improve hepatic fibrosis in these patients (97077). Methodological limitations such as publication bias and unclear calculations limit the reliability of these results. Another meta-analysis of 8 small clinical trials in adults with NAFLD shows that taking vitamin E 400-800 IU daily for up to 24 weeks improves liver enzyme levels when compared with placebo (112336). Vitamin E has also been evaluated in children with NAFLD. A meta-analysis of studies in this population shows that taking vitamin E 15-900 IU daily for up to 24 months reduces total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, but does not affect liver enzyme levels, measures of insulin resistance, body mass index (BMI), ballooning degeneration of the liver, or liver fibrosis when compared with placebo (107861). Until additional data showing its benefit becomes available, practice guidelines by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) state that vitamin E is not recommended in patients with NAFLD without liver biopsy (98130).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial for improving weight loss. Details: A meta-analysis of 24 small clinical studies shows that taking oral vitamin E, 67-900 mg daily does not affect weight, body mass index (BMI), or waist circumference in adults with obesity. In fact, in people with a normal BMI, vitamin E seems to increase body weight (107859).
• Oral mucositis. It is unclear if oral or topical vitamin E is beneficial in patients with oral mucositis from chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Details: Vitamin E has been evaluated in both chemotherapy- and radiation-induced mucositis. A small clinical study in children with chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis shows that a specific vitamin E product (Evion Paediatric Drops, Merck Limited) 200 IU applied topically in three divided doses daily for 1 week improves healing, pain, and the ability to eat when compared with placebo (94585). However, another small clinical study in patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancer shows that taking vitamin E 1000 mg once daily with pentoxifylline 400 mg twice daily does not reduce the incidence or severity of oral mucositis and dysphagia when compared with control (102972).
• Osteopenia. It is unclear if oral vitamin E helps slow the progression of osteopenia. Details: A small clinical study in postmenopausal adults with osteopenia who are taking calcium and vitamin D supplements shows that taking vitamin E (mixed tocopherols) 400 IU daily for 12 weeks prevents the increase in serum C-terminal telopeptide, a marker of bone resorption, seen with placebo over that same time period (107868).
• Osteoporosis. It is unclear if oral vitamin E helps to reduce complications of osteoporosis such as fractures. Details: Observational research has found that vitamin E supplementation is associated with a 22% lower risk of hip fracture and a 14% lower risk of all fractures in elderly females with osteoporosis (90086). Additional observational research has found that higher dietary vitamin E intake is also associated with a 34% reduced risk of fractures in adults at risk for osteoporosis (104415).
• Periodontitis. Oral vitamin E has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with moderate or advanced periodontitis shows that taking a supplement containing vitamin E, alpha-lipoic acid, coenzyme Q10, and other ingredients orally twice daily for 8 weeks in addition to standard nonsurgical therapy does not improve periodontal indices including bleeding on probing, gingival recession, plaque index, or inflammation, among others, when compared with placebo (111708).
• Peyronie disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin E reduces Peyronie disease symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients with Peyronie disease shows that taking vitamin E 894 IU daily in addition to conservative treatment for 6 months does not improve pain, but may reduce plaque, when compared with using conservative treatment alone. Conservative treatment included verapamil 10 mg biweekly injection and iontophoresis, blueberries 160 mg orally daily, propolis 600 mg orally daily, and topical diclofenac 4% twice daily (90090). It is not clear if this effect is due to vitamin E, the other interventions, or the combination.
• Photoreactive keratectomy. Oral vitamin E has only been evaluated for recovery after photoreactive keratectomy in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing laser surgery for myopia shows that taking vitamin A (retinol palmitate) 50,000-75,000 units with vitamin E (alpha-tocopheryl nicotinate) 343 IU daily seems to accelerate re-epithelialization, reduce haze formation, and improve visual acuity when compared with placebo (348).
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral vitamin E improves physical performance in the elderly. Details: Population research has found that increasing intake of dietary vitamin E is associated with increased physical performance and muscle strength in elderly people (14006).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Analyses of small clinical studies suggest that oral vitamin E may modestly reduce lipid levels in patients with PCOS. It is unclear if vitamin E can improve glycemic control, body weight, hormone levels, or symptoms of PCOS. Details: Meta-analyses of several small clinical studies in patients with PCOS show that taking vitamin E, alone or in combination with coenzyme Q10, fish oil, magnesium, or vitamin D, reduces total cholesterol by 9-18 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 7-16 mg/dL, and triglycerides by 13-21 mg/dL when compared with placebo. However, vitamin E does not appear to increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, reduce body weight, or improve hirsutism. The effects of vitamin E on glycemic indices and levels of testosterone, estradiol, and sex hormone binding globulin are unclear; individual meta-analyses show mixed results (112167,112168,112169). The validity of these findings is limited by a high degree of heterogeneity across the included studies, which varied in vitamin E dosing, treatment duration, and concomitant supplements used.
• Premature rupture of membranes (PROM). Oral vitamin E does not seem to prevent PROM, although it's unclear if it might prevent premature delivery due to PROM. Details: Vitamin E has been evaluated for the prevention and management of PROM. A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin E with other ingredients throughout pregnancy does not affect the risk of developing PROM when compared with placebo (97075). However, a clinical study in patients with PROM shows that taking vitamin E (RRR-alpha-tocopherol acetate) 400 IU and vitamin C 1000 mg daily, starting within 1 hour of membrane rupture and continuing for an unspecified amount of time, seems to hold back premature delivery by about 5 days when compared with placebo. However, maternal or neonatal outcomes did not seem to be affected (90078). It is not clear if this effect is due to vitamin E, vitamin C, or the combination.
• Radiation-induced sialadenitis. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is effective for the prevention or treatment of radiation-induced sialadenitis. Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing radiation therapy for thyroid cancer shows that taking vitamin E 200 mg daily for 5 weeks, starting 1 week before radiotherapy, improves several measures of parotid and submandibular salivary gland function when compared to baseline, suggesting that vitamin E might prevent radiation-induced sialadenitis and its associated complications (112332). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of control group.
• Radiation dermatitis. It is unclear if topical vitamin E is effective for the prevention or treatment of radiation dermatitis. Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing radiation therapy for breast cancer shows that applying a cream containing nanoparticles of vitamin E 2%, three times daily and after each radiation session until 2 weeks after radiation therapy is complete, does not reduce the severity of radiation dermatitis or improve quality of life when compared with a placebo cream. However, in patients that did not receive a boosted radiation dose, this vitamin E cream seems to slightly delay the onset of dermatitis when compared with placebo (112333).
• Radiation fibrosis. It is unclear if topical vitamin E reduces radiation fibrosis symptoms. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin E 1000 IU orally with pentoxifylline 800 mg daily seems to reverse radiation fibrosis (4672,4673). Regression of radiation fibrosis becomes significant after three months of treatment and continues to improve thereafter. After 12 months of treatment, mean surface area of fibrosis can decrease by 66% (4672). It is unclear if the benefit is due to vitamin E, pentoxifylline, or the combination. One very small study suggests that vitamin E alone does not seem to be effective when compared with placebo (10363).
• Renal cell carcinoma. It is unclear if oral vitamin E reduces renal cell carcinoma risk. Details: In 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding vitamin E and renal cell carcinoma risk. This qualified health claim was based on one weak and limited study. The FDA has determined that it is highly uncertain that vitamin E supplements reduce the risk of renal cell carcinoma (102332).
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). Oral vitamin E has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in hemodialysis patients shows that taking vitamin E 596 IU, vitamin C 200 mg, or a combination of both daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces severity of restless legs syndrome when compared with placebo (90093).
• Retinopathy of prematurity. It is unclear whether oral or parenteral vitamin E reduces the risk for retinopathy in prematurity (ROP). Details: A clinical study in very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress syndrome suggests that giving vitamin E 12.5 IU twice daily from 72 hours after birth through 28 days of age might reduce the incidence of stage 1 ROP when compared with placebo. However, the difference reached significance in the per-protocol analysis, but not in the intention-to-treat analysis (107864). Also, a meta-analysis that did not include this more recent study shows that administering oral, intravenous, or intramuscular vitamin E daily does not reduce the risk for ROP. Additionally, high levels of vitamin E and large intravenous doses of vitamin E have been associated with an increased risk for sepsis in premature infants (85062).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial in patients with RA. Details: A small clinical study in adults with RA shows that taking vitamin E 600 mg twice daily in conjunction with standard therapy for 12 weeks is superior to standard therapy alone for reducing pain, but not inflammation (4723). However, other studies show mixed results. A meta-analysis of 7 small clinical studies in patients with RA shows that taking vitamin E up to 1200 IU daily for up to 12 weeks does not reduce pain, tenderness, swelling, or morning stiffness when compared with control (112330).
• Schizophrenia. Oral vitamin E has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking vitamin E (RRR-alpha-tocopherol) 135.8 IU and a specific ascorbic acid supplement (CellaVie) 250 mg with or without ethyl eicosapentaenoate 500 mg daily for 16 weeks does not improve negative or positive symptoms of schizophrenia when compared with placebo (89234).
• Sickle cell disease. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin E for sickle cell disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin E for this condition.
• Stretch marks (striae distensae). Topical vitamin E has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that using a moisturizer containing vitamin E, rosehip oil, hydroxyprolisilane C, and gotu kola triterpenes at least twice daily on affected areas does not decrease incidence of new stretch marks, but does decrease the severity of new stretch marks by about 30%, when compared with control cream in pregnant patients (90076). It is not clear if this effect is due to vitamin E, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral vitamin E is beneficial for reducing stroke risk. Details: A trial-sequential meta-analysis of 12 clinical trials with 148,000 patients shows that vitamin E does not seem to reduce the risk of total stroke when compared with placebo. However, in a subgroup analysis, vitamin E was associated with an 8% lower risk of ischemic stroke and a trend to an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke when compared with placebo. Based on subgroup analyses, there was no difference on risk based on vitamin E dosage, use of synthetic versus natural vitamin E, and whether prevention was primary or secondary (104408). This analysis was limited due to high heterogeneity, small study size, and insufficient power to detect differences between treatments. Older meta-analyses also found mixed results of using vitamin E 74.5-1192 IU daily alone or in combination for up to 10 years. However, there was a similar sub-group analysis finding that vitamin E might reduce the risk of ischemic stroke, but it might also increase the risk of hemorrhagic stroke (14621,85201). Some clinical research shows that taking all-rac-alpha-tocopherol (synthetic vitamin E) might reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in male smokers with hypertension and diabetes (3359).
• Sunburn. Topical vitamin E has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Oral vitamin E alone does not seem to prevent sunburn. Details: Two small, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies suggest that taking high dose oral RRR-alpha-tocopherol (natural vitamin E) up to 2 grams daily in combination with vitamin C 3 grams protects against skin inflammation after exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. However, taking vitamin E alone does not seem to be beneficial when compared with control (4715,4716). This combination was also tried topically. In one study, topically applied vitamin E in combination with topical vitamin C and melatonin provided modest photoprotective effect when used prior to UV exposure, but had no effect when used during or after UV exposure (4713,4714).
• Uveitis. Oral vitamin E has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin E 149 IU twice daily with vitamin C 500 mg daily for 8 weeks improves visual acuity in patients with acute anterior uveitis, but does not seem to decrease inflammation measured by laser flare, when compared with placebo (4730). It is not clear if this effect is due to vitamin E, vitamin C, or the combination.
• Vaginal atrophy. It is unclear if a vitamin E suppository is beneficial in patients with vaginal atrophy. Details: A small clinical study in females with breast cancer and tamoxifen-induced vaginal atrophy shows that intravaginal administration of a vitamin E 1 mg suppository nightly before bed for 8 weeks improves self-reported symptoms of vaginal atrophy, decreases vaginal pH, and improves vaginal estrogenization, as measured by the Vaginal Maturation Index, when compared with placebo (99773). More evidence is needed to rate vitamin E for these uses.

(Read more about VITAMIN E)

EFFECTIVE

• Zinc deficiency. Orally or intravenously, zinc is effective for treating and preventing zinc deficiency. Details: Taking zinc orally or intravenously prevents and treats zinc deficiency (2619). However, routine zinc supplementation is not recommended (403). Zinc deficiency requiring supplementation may occur in patients with severe diarrhea, malabsorption syndromes, liver cirrhosis, and alcoholism; after major surgery, renal failure, and dialysis; or during long-term administration of total parenteral nutrition (3900,24321). Zinc supplementation (136 mg of elemental zinc per day) in patients with cirrhosis and zinc deficiency seems to improve liver function and glucose tolerance, possibly by increasing insulin-like growth factor (8624,87520).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Diarrhea. Oral zinc reduces duration and severity of acute diarrhea in malnourished children. Doses of 5-20 mg seem to be effective, while 5-10 mg daily is less likely to cause vomiting. Details: Most research, including meta-analyses and over 30 clinical trials, show that taking zinc orally reduces the duration and severity of acute and persistent diarrhea in malnourished or zinc-deficient children, but not in well-nourished children (87236,96074). Most studies have been conducted in Bangladesh and India, so it is unclear if these findings are generalizable to other geographic locations. The most comprehensive meta-analysis of clinical studies in children older than 6 months shows that zinc supplementation reduces the duration of acute diarrhea by about 11 hours and the duration of persistent diarrhea by about 16 hours when compared with placebo. However, zinc does not seem to reduce the duration of acute diarrhea in children younger than 6 months. Zinc supplementation seems to have the greatest benefit in children with clear malnutrition and diarrhea. In these children, zinc reduces diarrhea duration by about 26 hours and reduces the risk of diarrhea persisting through days 3, 5, and 7 by 18% to 24% when compared with placebo. There was no clear benefit of using zinc in a specific dose or salt form. The most common dose of zinc was 20 mg daily and salt forms included zinc sulfate, gluconate, and acetate (96074). Also, a large clinical trial in children with acute diarrhea shows that taking zinc 5 or 10 mg daily for 14 days is non-inferior to taking 20 mg. Furthermore, zinc 5 or 10 mg results in a respective 29% and 19% lower risk of vomiting within the first 30 minutes when compared with zinc 20 mg (104045). It's unclear whether zinc supplementation reduces mortality in children with diarrhea. A meta-analysis of clinical research in children under the age of five years shows that supplementation with zinc reduces the risk of mortality from diarrhea by 15% when compared with either placebo, other vitamin and/or mineral supplementation, or no supplementation (106239). However, many studies were conducted in hospitals where rates of mortality are low and were not adequately powered to determine whether zinc has an effect on mortality in children with acute diarrhea (87210,96074,106239).
• Wilson disease. Taking zinc orally improves symptoms of this condition. Details: Zinc acetate (Galzin) is an FDA-approved orphan drug for treating this condition. Zinc blocks copper absorption and increases copper elimination in the stool of people with Wilson disease (2692,2693,87327). Small clinical studies suggest that taking zinc after 8 weeks of treatment with tetrathiomolybdate alone can improve Kayser-Fleischer rings, urine copper levels, and neurological symptoms for up to 6 years post-treatment (63588,87491).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Acne. Orally, zinc might help to reduce symptoms of acne. However, it's unclear how oral zinc compares to conventional acne treatments. Topical zinc doesn't seem to be beneficial if used alone. Details: Observational research has found that people with acne seem to have lower zinc levels in the serum and skin (104056). A meta-analysis of small, low quality clinical trials suggests that taking zinc sulfate or zinc gluconate 137-300 mg 2-3 times daily by mouth can modestly improve acne when compared with placebo (104056). However, not all individual trials show benefit (87002,104056). So far, it is not clear how oral zinc compares to other treatments. Trials comparing zinc sulfate with various tetracyclines have yielded conflicting results (6505,6506,86946,106233). One large open-label clinical trial shows that taking zinc sulfate 200 mg twice daily for 12 weeks is at least as effective as lymecycline 300 mg daily for reducing acne severity. Quality of life related to acne was modestly improved in the patients using zinc sulfate (106233). However, in another clinical trial, a 3-month treatment of oral zinc gluconate 30 mg daily reduced the number of acne lesions from baseline, but was not as effective as minocycline (86946). When applied topically, clinical research shows that zinc does not help treat acne when compared with placebo (87297,104056). However, when used in combination with erythromycin, topical zinc seems to result in improvement (819,820,2687,2688).
• Acrodermatitis enteropathica. Oral zinc seems to improve symptoms of this rare genetic disorder. Details: Multiple case reports have found that taking oral zinc seems to help improve symptoms of acrodermatitis enteropathica, a rare disorder (821,2689,2690,2691). One case report in a female with necrolytic acral erythema and hepatitis C suggests that adding oral zinc sulfate 225 mg twice daily to interferon alfa-2b for 6 months contributed to resolving all lesions. Necrolytic acral erythema is categorized in the family of necrolytic erythemas that includes acrodermatitis enteropathica (6192).
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral zinc, especially in combination with antioxidant vitamins, seems to slow the progression of AMD. Details: Clinical research shows that taking elemental zinc 80 mg plus vitamin C 500 mg, vitamin E 400 IU, and beta-carotene 15 mg daily reduces the odds of progression to advanced AMD by 28%. In patients with more severe AMD, this combination reduced the odds of progression to advanced AMD by 34%. This combination also reduced the odds of visual acuity loss by 27% in patients with severe AMD (7303,11326). However, there is contradictory evidence about the effects of zinc plus antioxidants on visual acuity loss or the progression to advanced AMD in low-risk patients with AMD (6583,6584,7303). Some clinical evidence shows that, when taken without antioxidant vitamins, zinc supplementation does not slow the progression of existing AMD (6580,90069). However, a subgroup analysis of results from a large clinical trial that included patients with intermediate or advanced AMD suggests that the effect of zinc on AMD progression might vary depending on a patient's genetic predisposition. Complement factor H (CFH) and age-related maculopathy susceptibility 2 (ARMS2) are two genes for which specific variations (i.e., risk alleles) have been associated with an increased risk of AMD. Results from the retrospective subgroup analysis suggest that zinc supplementation may DECREASE the progression of AMD in patients with ARMS2 risk alleles and INCREASE the progression of AMD in patients with CFH risk alleles (90193). However, some experts question the results from this analysis due to the retrospective nature of the study (93045). Another retrospective analysis of similar data found that only zinc plus antioxidants, but not zinc alone, was beneficial for slowing the progression of AMD, regardless of the patient's genotype (93046). Consequently, the American Academy of Ophthalmology does not currently recommend routine genetic screening to determine which patients would benefit from zinc, antioxidants, or the combination. Instead, patients with intermediate or advanced AMD are recommended to take an antioxidant and zinc supplement similar to those used in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) and the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) (93047). Large scale population studies suggest that increasing dietary intake of zinc might reduce the risk of developing AMD (6579,14257).
• Child growth. Oral zinc seems to increase growth when taken by children and improve infant growth in the first year of life when taken by pregnant adults. Details: A meta-analysis of 8 clinical studies in healthy children over 2 years old shows that taking supplemental zinc 5-15 mg daily for 6-56 weeks modestly increases height and weight when compared with placebo. This analysis also shows that taking zinc may improve height for age, but not weight for age when compared with placebo (112474). Most of these studies were conducted in developing countries; results may not apply elsewhere. Another clinical study in pregnant adults in Peru shows that taking zinc 15 mg daily in addition to iron and folic acid, starting during the first or second trimester and continuing up to one month after delivery, modestly improves growth measures of infants at one year when compared with taking iron and folic acid alone. Improved growth measures include body weight, calf and chest circumference, and calf muscle area (87130).
• Common cold. Oral zinc seems to help treat cold symptoms in adults. However, it is unclear if zinc is beneficial for common cold prevention. Details: Using zinc oral lozenges seems to be beneficial in helping TREAT the common cold in adults. The majority of clinical trials and analyses of clinical research show a significant decrease in the duration of symptoms of the common cold when adults take zinc gluconate or zinc acetate lozenges providing 9-24 mg of elemental zinc per dose. It is recommended that lozenges be taken every 2 hours while awake, starting within 48 hours of symptom onset for a total daily dose of at least 75 mg in order to attain a mean cold duration reduction of 3 days (333,334,335,337,6703,6705,87501,92212,106902). However, not all studies have been positive (333,338,339,6522,6700,87512). The reasons for these different findings are not clear, but might be due to differences in zinc formulations and doses and study methodologies. In some cases, flavoring agents such as citric acid, mannitol, and sorbitol might chelate zinc and decrease zinc ionization. Since ionization is thought to be necessary for zinc activity, a decrease in zinc ionization could decrease effectiveness (300,340,6522). Some of the positive studies have also been criticized for inadequately blinding the unpleasant, distinctive taste of zinc (6522,6706). Allergy and smoking status do not appear to impact the efficacy of zinc acetate lozenges (92212). Overall, zinc products may be beneficial for modestly reducing the duration of symptoms of the common cold in adults, but adverse effects such as bad taste and nausea may limit their usefulness (18216). There is conflicting evidence for the use of oral zinc products to PREVENT colds. Some clinical research suggests that taking zinc prophylactically does not prevent the common cold in adults (10780,10784) or children (341). However, other clinical research suggests that administering zinc gluconate lozenges can reduce the incidence of colds in children and adolescents (10803,86972). In a meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials with a total of 5446 participants, oral zinc prevented 5 viral upper respiratory tract infections per 100 person months of zinc use when compared with placebo, with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 20 (106902). Intranasal zinc is not recommended for the prevention or treatment of the common cold due to the risk for anosmia. See the Adverse Effects section for more information. Some research shows that zinc nasal spray (as a sulfate, gluconate emulsion, or gluconium gel) reduces the severity and duration of cold symptoms; however, other research has found no effect (6471,8628,8629,10247,87035). Zinc nasal spray does not seem to prevent experimentally-induced colds (8628).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). While oral zinc does not seem to speed recovery from COVID-19 in non-hospitalized patients, an analysis of a small number of studies suggests that oral or intravenous zinc might reduce the risk of death in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Details: A small observational study in patients with COVID-19 has found that lower serum zinc levels are associated with worse clinical outcomes, such as admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and death, when compared with higher zinc levels (105681). Another small observational study has found that 96% of patients with confirmed COVID-19 were zinc-deficient based on plasma levels of zinc, and that these patients had lower plasma zinc levels than a group of individuals without COVID-19. However, plasma zinc concentrations were only weakly correlated with length of hospital stay and there was no correlation with morbidity or mortality (106236). One clinical study in adult outpatients with COVID-19 shows that taking zinc gluconate 50 mg daily at bedtime, alone or with vitamin C (ascorbic acid) 8000 mg daily, for 10 days does not reduce symptom severity when compared with standard care (104450). This study was terminated prior to complete enrollment due to a lack of effect with zinc and/or vitamin C supplementation. Limitations of this study include a lack of placebo control and blinding. Zinc supplementation also does not appear to enhance the clinical efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection. Taking zinc sulfate 220 mg twice daily during a 6-day course of hydroxychloroquine does not improve the clinical recovery rate, reduce the mortality rate, or reduce the need for mechanical ventilation when compared with hydroxychloroquine alone (104818). Other research has evaluated zinc in hospitalized patients. Multiple meta-analyses of small and low-quality clinical studies, including randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies, involving hospitalized patients with COVID-19 shows that supplementation with oral or intravenous zinc is associated with a 29% to 43% reduction in the odds of in-hospital mortality when compared with control (109451,110631). However, in one meta-analysis, the odds of 30-day mortality were not different between groups (110631). These meta-analyses did not elevate the most effective form, dose, frequency, or duration of zinc supplementation (109451,110631). Additionally, a retrospective study in adults admitted to the ICU with COVID-19 has found that those who received oral zinc sulfate, 220 mg daily for a median of 11 days, had a lower 30-day mortality rate when compared with those who did not receive zinc. However, there was no difference in hospital length of stay or in-hospital mortality (106903).
• Depression. Oral zinc seems to be beneficial when used in combination with antidepressant treatments. Details: Population research has found that higher zinc levels and higher dietary intake of zinc are associated with a 28% lower incidence of depression (90227,97139,104057). Oral zinc seems to be beneficial as an adjunct therapy in depression. A meta-analysis of small, low-quality studies in patients with major depression shows that taking zinc in addition to antidepressant therapy is associated with modestly improved depression symptoms when compared with antidepressant therapy alone (104044). Clinical studies used zinc doses of 7-25 mg daily for up to 12 weeks (86985,90221,104044). One small clinical study also shows that adding zinc to imipramine therapy might improve depression that was previously resistant to antidepressant treatment (87158). One clinical guideline also provisionally recommends use of zinc 25 mg elemental orally daily to treat patients with depression based on low-quality evidence. This guideline recommends use of chelated or picolinate zinc products over other forms of zinc (110318).
• Diabetes. Oral zinc might modestly improve glycemic control in some patients. Details: A meta-analysis of 12 clinical studies in patients with diabetes shows that taking zinc supplements reduces fasting blood glucose by up to 20 mg/dL and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.35% when compared with control. However, when only high quality studies were included, the reduction in fasting blood glucose dropped to 12 mg/dL. Zinc seems to only have glycemic benefit in patients living in the Eastern hemisphere, and not the Western hemisphere. Also, glucose reduction seems to be higher with inorganic zinc formulations at doses of at least 30 mg daily taken for at least one month (104080). Zinc has also been evaluated for improving lipid parameters in patients with diabetes. A meta-analysis of nine studies in patients with diabetes shows that taking zinc reduces triglycerides by 17 mg/dL, but does not seem to affect low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo (104041). The findings from these meta-analyses are limited by the high heterogeneity and small size of the included studies. Zinc has also been studied for gestational diabetes. Some clinical research in patients with gestational diabetes shows that taking zinc gluconate for 6 weeks, starting at 24-28 weeks' gestation, reduces fasting plasma glucose levels by about 10% and improves insulin resistance by 14% when compared to baseline (96072). However, taking zinc gluconate does not reduce the need for caesarean section or insulin therapy, or improve infant outcomes, such as size or health at birth, in these patients (96073).
• Diaper rash. Topical and oral zinc seem to reduce the incidence and severity of diaper rash in infants. Details: Clinical research shows that administering oral zinc gluconate 10 mg daily for 4 months can reduce the incidence of diaper rash in infants when compared with placebo (87281). Other clinical research shows that applying 47% zinc oxide paste to affected areas for 5 days can improve the healing of diaper rash. However, the effect of zinc oxide paste is inferior to eosin 2% solution (86918).
• Gingivitis. Topical zinc seems to reduce the development of gingivitis. Details: While some clinical research shows that zinc, in combination with triclosan, does not prevent plaque and gingivitis (24093,87020), most clinical research shows that using zinc toothpaste or mouthwash, alone or in combination with triclosan, can prevent plaque accumulation, gingivitis, or the formation of calculus (6523,6524,6525,6526,6527,6528,6529,87418,87507). However, most studies used zinc citrate in combination with triclosan, which is not available in the US (6523). For treating existing plaque, calculus, and gingivitis, some clinical research suggests that using zinc citrate 0.5% toothpaste three times daily for 3 months reduces calculus scores by 14% when compared with placebo (87205). However, other evidence suggests that stannous fluoride 0.454% toothpaste is more effective than zinc citrate 0.75% toothpaste for reducing plaque levels (87136).
• Halitosis. Oral zinc seems to reduce halitosis when taken as a gum, mouth rinse, or candy. Details: Clinical research shows that chewing zinc-containing gum reduces volatile sulfur compounds and related odor levels when compared with placebo gum in patients with moderate to severe halitosis (87538). Clinical research also shows that using one of two mouth rinses (Halita, which contains 0.05% chlorhexidine and 0.14% zinc lactate, or Meridol, which contains 0.025% fluoride plus 0.2% zinc lactate) improves breath odor and volatile sulfur compounds by approximately two-fold when compared with mouth rinse containing only 0.05% fluoride or chlorhexidine 0.12% (90206). Additional clinical research shows that sucking a candy containing abrasive substances and zinc gluconate 0.5% or candy containing abrasive substances plus zinc 0.25% and propolis 1% improves breath malodor two- to three-fold when compared with sucking placebo candy (90196).
• Herpes labialis (cold sores). Topical zinc seems to reduce the severity and duration of cold sores. Details: Applying zinc topically seems to help treat herpes simplex infection (6538,6539,8623,11051). Zinc sulfate seems to reduce the severity and duration of symptoms in both orolabial and genital herpes (6538,6539). Zinc oxide (0.3%) in combination with glycine cream applied topically every 2 hours to facial and circumoral herpes seems to reduce symptoms such as blistering, soreness, itching, and tingling. It can also reduce the duration of lesions from 6.5 days to 5 days when treatment is begun within 24 hours of onset of symptoms (8623). A specific combination product containing zinc oxide and L-lysine plus 14 other ingredients (Super Lysine Plus +) also seems to help decrease symptoms and duration of herpes lesions when applied topically every 2 hours (11051). However, zinc may not be effective for recurrent herpes simplex infections. In one clinical study, applying zinc sulfate 0.0025% or 0.05% solution to affected areas did not reduce the frequency, severity, or duration of herpes episodes when compared with a placebo solution in patients experiencing more than five episodes per year (87330).
• Hypogeusia. Oral zinc might improve taste disturbance and taste acuity in people with hypogeusia of various etiologies. Details: A meta-analysis of low-quality studies in patients with taste disorders that are idiopathic or due to zinc deficiency shows that taking oral zinc modestly improves taste acuity when compared with placebo (104055). Studies tested zinc gluconate, zinc sulfate, zinc acetate, and zinc-carnosine as Polaprezinc (Promac, Zeria Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.), containing 17-68 mg elemental zinc, daily for up to 12 weeks (104055). Zinc also might improve hypogeusia conditions unrelated to zinc deficiency, such as gustin/carbonic anhydrase VI deficiency, captopril-induced taste disturbances, hypogeusia due to chronic renal failure, and post-traumatic olfactory disorder (6543,6544,104055). It also seems be beneficial in radiation-induced dysgeusia. A meta-analysis of three small clinical trials shows that oral zinc reduces the risk of radiation-induced dysgeusia by 28%, but does not improve taste acuity when compared with placebo (104043). However, patients with hypogeusia from other causes may not benefit. Zinc supplementation does not seem to improve taste perception when compared with placebo in patients with acetazolamide-induced taste dysfunction or chemotherapy-induced taste dysfunction (87388,90214).
• Leishmania lesions. Oral zinc and intralesional injections of zinc might improve healing of these lesions. Details: Clinical research shows that taking zinc sulfate 2.5-10 mg/kg orally in three divided doses daily, improves the cure rate of cutaneous leishmania lesions after 45 days when compared with no treatment (86935). Other clinical research shows that intralesional injections of zinc sulfate 2% solution for 6 weeks improves cure rates of cutaneous leishmania lesions when compared with no treatment (6587). However, intralesional injections with zinc sulfate solution does not appear to be more effective than intralesional injections of meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime), hypertonic saline, or sodium stibogluconate (6587,86996,87008).
• Leprosy. Oral zinc seems to be beneficial when used in combination with anti-leprosy drugs. Details: Zinc levels appear to be reduced in people with leprosy. Early clinical research suggests that the addition of zinc improves tolerance of the anti-leprosy drug regimen and might allow for lowering or eliminating steroid doses in erythema nodosum leprosum, a severe form of leprosy (6534,6535,6536,6537).
• Low birth weight. Oral zinc supplementation seems to improve growth in low birth weight infants. Whether oral zinc can improve other outcomes, including mortality, is unclear. Taking oral zinc during pregnancy does not seem to reduce the risk of having a low birth weight infant. Details: While there is some mixed evidence regarding the effects of zinc supplementation on weight gain and length in infants born with low birth weight (87172,87452,90229), a meta-analysis of 14 clinical trials in preterm or low birth weight infants receiving breastmilk shows that zinc supplementation, typically 5-7 mg daily started at birth and continued for up to 12 months with or without other micronutrients, increases weight by around 380 grams, length by around 3 cm, and head circumference by around 0.6 cm when compared with control (109455). There is also mixed evidence regarding the effect of zinc supplementation on other outcomes in low birth weight infants. A large clinical trial in full-term, underweight infants aged 1-6 months in developing countries shows that adding zinc to nutritional supplementation reduces the risk of mortality by about 68% when compared with nutritional supplementation not containing zinc (8920). A small clinical trial in very low birth weight preterm infants born in an industrialized country shows that adding zinc to multivitamin supplementation appears to reduce the occurrence of necrotizing enterocolitis and mortality. However, adding zinc does not appear to prevent late-onset sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or retinopathy of prematurity (90229). A meta-analysis of these trials and two other studies in low birth weight infants shows that supplementation with zinc reduces the risk of all-cause mortality by 52% when compared with either placebo, other vitamin and/or mineral supplementation, or no supplementation (106239). Another small clinical study in low birth weight and preterm infants born in a developing country shows that zinc supplementation seems to improve alertness and attention when compared with placebo (97140). However, a meta-analysis of 14 clinical trials in preterm or low birth weight infants receiving breastmilk shows that zinc supplementation, typically 5-7 mg daily started at birth and continued for up to 12 months with or without other micronutrients, does not improve mental or psychomotor development or reduce the risk of mortality, hospitalization, acute respiratory infection, or sepsis when compared with control (109455). Some of these discrepant findings may be due to differences in patient populations (hospitalized, non-hospitalized), milk sources (breastfed, formula-fed, or both), and duration of follow-up. The effect of zinc intake or supplementation during pregnancy has also been evaluated. Population research has found that low dietary intake of zinc during pregnancy is associated with low birth weight in infants; similarly, zinc supplementation is associated with increased infant weight at birth (87471,105678). However, a meta-analysis and a large clinical study show that zinc supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of having a low birth weight infant (97142,105679). Reasons for the discrepancies may be due to differing zinc status prior to supplementation. Also, numerous factors contribute to the risk of low birth weight, which may confound research on the use of zinc supplementation alone.
• Peptic ulcers. Oral zinc seems to treat and prevent peptic ulcers. Details: Taking zinc orally seems to help treat and prevent peptic ulcers (6588,6589,6591). Some clinical research shows that zinc acexamate improves peptic ulcers when compared with placebo (6589,87285), and seems to be as effective as H2-receptor antagonist drugs (6589,87533). It is not known if other zinc salts are effective.
• Pneumonia. Oral zinc might reduce the risk for pneumonia in children, but it doesn't seem to improve symptoms in children that already have pneumonia. Details: A meta-analysis of four clinical studies shows that giving zinc supplements to children, ages 3 months to 5 years living in developing countries, some of whom were undernourished, reduces the risk of pneumonia incidence by 21% when compared with placebo (104047). Another meta-analysis of clinical research in children under the age of five years shows that supplementation with zinc reduces the risk of pneumonia mortality by 21% when compared with either placebo, other vitamin and/or mineral supplementation, or no supplementation (106239). The research on TREATING existing pneumonia in children is inconsistent. Most meta-analyses and clinical studies in children ages 2 months to 5 years with severe pneumonia show that taking elemental zinc in addition to antibiotic therapy does not improve symptom resolution or the time to recovery when compared with antibiotic therapy alone. Zinc also does not seem to reduce mortality in these patients (87248,90197,96080,98131,104042). However, two clinical studies in children in the same age group with pneumonia suggest that adding zinc to standard antibiotic therapy improves symptom resolution and decreases hospital stay when compared with placebo (11052,87242). Reasons for these discrepancies are not clear, but may be related to zinc status prior to treatment.
• Prematurity. Analyses of clinical studies suggest that oral zinc improves growth in premature infants. Whether zinc improves development or reduces the risk of mortality in these patients is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical trials in hospitalized infants born prematurely suggests that receiving enteral zinc supplementation at a dose of up to 10 mg daily reduces mortality and might improve short-term weight gain when compared with placebo (105687). Another meta-analysis of small clinical studies in preterm infants shows that adding zinc to formula or to a multivitamin seems to modestly increase infant weight and height and improve motor development when compared with control (105676). A larger meta-analysis of 14 clinical trials in preterm or low birth weight infants receiving breastmilk shows that zinc supplementation, typically 5-7 mg daily started at birth and continued for up to 12 months with or without other micronutrients, increases weight by around 380 grams, length by around 3 cm, and head circumference by around 0.6 cm when compared with control. However, zinc supplementation did not improve mental or psychomotor development or reduce the risk of mortality, hospitalization, acute respiratory infection, or sepsis when compared with control (109455). These analyses are limited by imprecision as well as a high risk of bias in some of the included studies. Some of the discrepant findings may be due to differences in patient populations (hospitalized, non-hospitalized), milk sources (breastfed, formula-fed, or both), and duration of follow-up.
• Pressure ulcers. Topical zinc paste seems to work as a skin barrier and improve pressure ulcer healing. Oral zinc has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study shows that applying zinc oxide paste to pressure ulcers daily for 8 weeks reduces necrotic tissue and decreases the surface area of skin pressure ulcers similarly to using a topical streptokinase-streptodornase product (Varidase) (87331). Other small clinical studies show that applying zinc oxide paste to pressure ulcers daily for 8-12 weeks improves healing similarly to a hydrocolloid dressing (Duoderm) (87181) or a specific barrier film product (Cavilon No Sting Barrier Film) (87017). Oral zinc has been evaluated in combination with other ingredients for the treatment of grade II-IV pressure ulcers. Two small clinical studies in hospitalized patients shows that administering an oral nutritional supplement enriched with zinc, L-arginine, and vitamin C improves ulcer healing when compared with a standard diet (31953,87173). Also, clinical research in patients living in long-term care facilities shows that taking an oral nutritional supplement enriched in protein, zinc, L-arginine, and vitamin C daily for 9 weeks reduces ulcer area and decreases oozing when compared to baseline (32045). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Sickle cell disease. Oral zinc seems to improve symptoms of sickle cell disease in patients with zinc deficiency. Details: Taking zinc orally seems to help reduce symptoms of sickle cell disease in people with zinc deficiency (6594,6595,6596,8626,87343). Taking zinc supplements also seems to decrease the occurrence rate of sickle-cell crises and infections (6594,6596,90228). Additionally, zinc might reduce the number of hospitalizations for sickle cell crises, although the severity of the crises that do develop is not necessarily decreased by taking zinc supplements (6594,6596). In prepubertal children and adolescents with homozygous sickle cell disease, taking zinc seems to improve growth, height, and weight gain (8626,87403).
• Warts. Oral and topical zinc seem to improve the cure rate of cutaneous warts. Details: A small clinical study suggests that applying zinc sulfate 10% solution three times daily for 4 weeks improves plane warts, but not common warts, when compared with distilled water (87094). Another small clinical study suggests that applying topical zinc oxide 20% ointment twice daily for up to 3 months seems to have a similar cure rate as ointment containing salicylic acid 15% with lactic acid 15% (87082). Taking zinc orally may also be effective in treating warts (87227). A meta-analysis of low quality clinical studies shows that taking zinc sulfate orally improves the odds of curing cutaneous warts nearly 17-fold when compared with respective controls (87227). Preliminary clinical research in adults treated with cryotherapy for anogenital warts shows that taking zinc gluconate 30 mg orally three times daily for 2 months does not reduce the number of warts when compared with placebo (111445).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Alopecia areata. Oral zinc does not seem to improve symptoms of this condition. Details: Although there is preliminary evidence that suggests zinc in combination with biotin might be helpful for alopecia areata (6932), most studies indicate that zinc is not effective for alopecia areata, alopecia totalis, or alopecia universalis (6931,6932).
• Cystic fibrosis. Oral zinc does not improve cystic fibrosis symptoms or progression. Details: Clinical research shows that taking supplements providing 30-90 mg of elemental zinc for 6 weeks to one year does not improve lung function when compared with placebo in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis (87066,87113,96079). One clinical study also shows that taking elemental zinc for one year does not reduce the number of days requiring oral or intravenous antibiotics for pulmonary infections (96079). However, one study shows that taking zinc can reduce the number of days of oral antibiotic use when compared with placebo (87113).
• HIV/AIDS. Oral zinc does not seem to improve outcomes in patients with HIV. Details: Clinical research in adult HIV patients with normal or low zinc levels shows that taking elemental zinc 12-15 mg daily orally for 18 months along with antiretroviral therapy does not improve viral load, CD4/8 counts, or mortality when compared with placebo (87036,87216,105686). In children with HIV-1, clinical research shows that administering zinc sulfate, providing 10 mg elemental zinc, daily for 6 months does not improve mortality, viral load, or CD4 counts when compared with placebo (82377).
• HIV/AIDS-related pregnancy complications. Oral zinc does not prevent pregnancy complications related to HIV infection. Details: Adding zinc 25 mg orally during pregnancy does not seem to reduce parent-to-child vertical transmission of HIV, infant mortality, birth weight, or gestational period in HIV-infected females with low zinc levels (11054,87034). Also, one clinical study in HIV-1-infected pregnant patients suggests that supplemental zinc can increase the risk of wasting, as assessed by weight and mid-upper arm circumference, by 170% when compared with placebo (87034).
• HIV/AIDS-related wasting. Oral zinc does not seem to improve HIV-related wasting syndrome. Details: A clinical study in patients with HIV-related wasting syndrome shows that taking zinc orally in combination with vitamins and albendazole does not seem to improve diarrhea or mortality when compared with taking albendazole alone (6564).
• Infant development. Oral zinc does not seem to improve infant mental and psychomotor development. Details: Clinical research, including a meta-analysis of eight studies, shows that giving zinc to infants or children at high risk for zinc deficiency does not improve mental and psychomotor development when compared with placebo (87013,90209). In another meta-analysis of studies in children whose baseline zinc status was not specified, there was no beneficial effect of zinc supplementation on mental or psychomotor development at 6 or 12 months of age (104817).
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Oral zinc does not improve symptoms of IBD. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking zinc orally does not seem to help treat IBD (6913,6915,6916).
• Influenza. Oral zinc does not seem to reduce the risk for influenza. Details: Supplemental zinc seems to improve cell-mediated immune response in elderly people (824), but it does not seem to have a significant effect on antibody response and incidence of influenza infection after the vaccine (6553,6563). Additionally, zinc supplementation in patients on hemodialysis, who have a high risk of zinc deficiency, does not seem to improve response to influenza vaccine (10809). Taking zinc supplements orally is unlikely to improve immune function in people without risk factors for zinc deficiency (10789). However, there is preliminary evidence that suggests zinc along with selenium might reduce the incidence of infections in institutionalized older patients (8921).
• Otitis media. Oral zinc does not prevent otitis media in children. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking elemental zinc 3-70 mg daily for up to 24 months does not prevent the occurrence of ear infections in children from low- or middle-income countries (87258).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral zinc taken prenatally does not seem to be beneficial for pre-eclampsia prevention. Details: A meta-analysis and a large clinical study show that zinc supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia when compared with placebo (97142,105679).
• Prostate cancer. Oral zinc does not reduce the risk for prostate cancer or prostate cancer-related mortality. Details: Some epidemiological research has found an inverse relationship between dietary zinc intake and prostate cancer (96075). Also some clinical research shows that taking zinc 20 mg in combination with vitamin C 120 mg, vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) 30 mg, beta-carotene 6 mg, and selenium 100 mcg daily for an average of 8 years might reduce the risk of prostate cancer in men with normal PSA levels; however, it does not seem to be beneficial for reducing the risk of prostate cancer in patients with PSA levels above 3 mcg/L (14135). However, some evidence raises concern that zinc might actually INCREASE the risk of prostate cancer. A large-scale population study found that taking more than 100 mg of supplemental zinc daily or taking supplemental zinc for 10 or more years doubles the risk of developing prostate cancer (10306). Another large-scale population study shows that men who take a multivitamin more than seven times per week and who also take a separate zinc supplement have a significantly increased risk of prostate cancer-related mortality (15607). Despite these studies suggesting the potential for adverse effects of zinc, a meta-analysis of mainly population research has found that there is no association between zinc intake and the risk of prostate cancer (96075).
• Psoriasis. Oral zinc does not reduce the severity of psoriasis symptoms. Details: Zinc epidermal levels are reportedly lower in people with psoriasis (6509). However, taking zinc orally does not seem to help treat psoriasis (6513,6514,6912,87363). Zinc supplementation has no effect on the psoriasis area and severity index (6513,6514).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Oral zinc does not treat symptoms of RA. Details: Multiple clinical studies in patients with RA show that taking zinc orally does not improve function or symptoms when compared with baseline or control (6517,6518,6519,87406).
• Sexual dysfunction. Oral zinc does not improve sexual function in males with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Details: Clinical research shows that zinc supplementation does not improve sexual activity or libido when compared with placebo in males with sexual dysfunction secondary to CKD (6708,6568,87220,87386,87416). In fact, one clinical study shows that taking zinc can decrease the frequency of intercourse by 76% when compared with placebo in patients with CKD-related sexual dysfunction (87220).
• Tinnitus. Oral zinc does not improve severity of tinnitus or reduce tinnitus-related disability. Details: A meta-analysis of three small clinical trials in adults with tinnitus shows that taking elemental zinc 50 mg daily for up to 16 weeks does not improve tinnitus severity, or disability from tinnitus when compared with placebo (104051).

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Malaria. Oral zinc does not prevent or treat malaria in undernourished children or pregnant adults in developing countries. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in children or pregnant adults shows that taking zinc orally, alone or in combination with other supplements, for does not reduce the risk of malaria parasitemia (111444). A large multi-country study in zinc-deficient preschool children with acute malaria shows that taking zinc supplements does not affect fever, parasitemia, or hemoglobin when compared with placebo (10246). An even larger clinical study of over 40,000 children with malaria aged 1-36 months shows that taking zinc 5-10 mg daily orally for approximately 17 months does not reduce mortality when compared with placebo (87078). Zinc supplements also do not appear to protect against infection by Plasmodium falciparum (8638,87235,86937). However, one small study in children with low and high levels of parasitemia shows that taking zinc 10 mg daily for 46 weeks may lower the incidence of fever episodes by 38% and 69%, respectively, when compared with placebo (86937).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in patients with age-related cognitive decline. Details: An epidemiological study based on elderly adults enrolled in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) has found that taking zinc may improve cognition in a non-linear manner. Daily doses below 9 mg and 8 mg in males and females, respectively, showed a positive association with cognitive function, but doses above that level showed no association. Additionally, high intake of both zinc and selenium was associated with improved cognition in females, but not in males (108446). Dietary intake was collected from two patient-reported 24-hour recalls and cognition was only measured once, limiting the validity of these findings.
• Alcohol-related liver disease. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in patients with alcoholic-related liver cirrhosis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis shows that taking zinc sulfate 600 mg daily for 6 weeks improves liver function, based on increased alkaline phosphatase activity and reduced serum bilirubin, when compared to baseline (87325).
• Anorexia nervosa. Oral zinc seems to improve weight gain in people with anorexia nervosa. Details: Anorexia nervosa might be linked with zinc deficiency. Small clinical trials in adolescents and adults with anorexia nervosa show that oral zinc supplements might help increase weight gain and improve depressive symptoms when compared with placebo (6905,6906).
• Arsenic poisoning. Oral zinc has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking zinc 4 mg in combination with spirulina extract 500 mg daily for 16 weeks can decrease skin manifestations and reduce arsenic levels in the urine and in hair of patients with chronic arsenic poisoning (18301).
• Asthenopia (eye strain). Oral zinc has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in adults without dry eye disease shows that taking a specific combination product containing zinc 10 mg, L-carnitine 50 mg, elderberry fruit extract 300 mg, currant 100 mg, and Eleutherococcus root 50 mg (Meramirt CM) orally once daily for 1 month improves measures of eye strain and contrast sensitivity when compared to baseline. Improvements in these measures were lacking in the control group (111295). Statistical comparison between the two groups was not reported. It is unclear if these effects are due to zinc, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Athletic performance. Oral zinc has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in sleep-deprived recreational athletes shows that taking a combination of zinc 90 mg, magnesium 1350 mg, and vitamin B6 31.5 mg orally for 3 nights at bedtime does not improve grip strength, squat, or bench press performance when compared with placebo (113655).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for alleviating eczema in children. Details: A small clinical study in children with eczema shows that taking zinc sulfate 185.4 mg orally daily for 8 weeks does not appear to improve the surface area affected and degree of erythema, symptom scores of itch and sleep disturbance, or topical steroid use when compared with placebo. Also, plasma zinc levels appear to be normal in children with eczema (6911).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Oral zinc might improve certain symptoms in children with ADHD. Details: Observational research has found that lower serum zinc levels are both more prevalent in children with ADHD and are linked to worsened response to stimulant therapy (9965,9966,9967). Based on this evidence, there is some interest in using zinc to improve symptoms in children with ADHD. A meta-analysis of six small clinical trials shows that although taking zinc modestly improves overall symptoms of ADHD when compared with placebo, there is no effect on hyperactivity or inattention when these outcomes are examined separately. The sub-analyses conducted for these two separate outcomes included only 3 studies. Most, but not all, of the included studies were conducted in children also receiving methylphenidate treatment (106240). Elemental zinc, usually as sulfate, was typically used in doses of 10-40 mg daily for 6-12 weeks (11350,12060,106240). There is some evidence that zinc could be most helpful in children with a high body mass index (BMI), low zinc levels, and low free fatty acid levels (11350). It is unclear if zinc is beneficial in children who are not already taking stimulant medications. One clinical guideline also provisionally recommends against use of oral zinc to treat patient with ADHD based on low-quality evidence (110318).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in children with autism spectrum disorder. Details: One small clinical study conducted in children with autism spectrum disorder shows that taking zinc 15-30 mg orally, alone or as add-on therapy to amphetamine, does not improve attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms when compared with placebo (98711). However, the optimal mg/kg dose of amphetamine was shown to be 37% lower for those children also taking zinc 15 mg twice daily when compared with those taking placebo (98711).
• Autoimmune thyroiditis. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in children with autoimmune thyroiditis. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 3-18 years with autoimmune thyroiditis shows that taking zinc acetate 25 mg daily in addition to standard therapy for 12 weeks does not change thyroid auto-antibody levels, thyroid function tests, or oxidative stress markers when compared with standard therapy alone. However, subjects taking zinc did not require escalation in levothyroxine doses when compared with the control group control group, which did require levothyroxine dose escalation (113661).
• Behcet disease. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in patients with Behcet disease. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with Behcet disease shows that taking zinc gluconate 30 mg daily for 12 weeks does not improve disease activity scores, quality of life, or measures of inflammation when compared with placebo (109453).
• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Although there is interest in using oral zinc for BPH, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of zinc for this condition.
• Beta-thalassemia. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in patients with beta-thalassemia major. Details: A small clinical study in children recently diagnosed with beta-thalassemia major shows that initiating zinc sulfate in addition to standard blood transfusions increases linear growth rate when compared with transfusions alone (87329). Another small clinical study in adult and pediatric patients with thalassemia major and low bone mass shows that taking zinc 25 mg daily (as zinc sulfate) for 18 months improves whole-body bone mineral content, as well as hip and spine bone mineral density, by small amounts when compared with placebo (90208).
• Brain tumor. It is unclear if dietary zinc is beneficial for reducing the risk for brain cancer. Details: Population research has found that zinc intake is not associated with a reduced risk of developing brain cancer (87098).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if increased dietary zinc intake is beneficial for reducing the risk for breast cancer. Details: Population research has found that neither zinc intake nor blood levels of zinc are associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (106229).
• Bronchiolitis. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for viral bronchiolitis in infants and children. Details: A small clinical study in children 2 years or younger with acute viral bronchiolitis shows that taking elemental zinc 10-20 mg as zinc sulfate for 5 days improves clinical recovery and reduces the duration of hospital stay by almost one day when compared with placebo. After 72 hours, 98% of infants and children taking zinc were considered fully recovered, compared to only 52% of infants taking placebo (96076).
• Burning mouth syndrome. Topical zinc has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with burning mouth syndrome shows that taking zinc 15 mg and vitamin C 35 mg once daily, along with a vitamin B complex twice daily, for 30 days modestly decreases pain and burning when compared to baseline (105195). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Furthermore, it is unclear if the benefit is due to zinc, other vitamins, or the combination.
• Burns. Intravenous zinc has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. The effects of oral zinc for burn healing are unclear. Details: Administering zinc intravenously in combination with other minerals seems to improve the outcomes of burn patients. Supplementation with zinc, copper, and selenium appears to improve wound healing, reduce pulmonary infections, and shorten intensive care unit stay in patients with serious burns (6520,87085). The effect of supplementation with zinc alone is unclear.
• Canker sores. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in patients with canker sores. Details: Evidence for the use of zinc in canker sores is conflicting. A small clinical crossover study in patients with recurrent canker sores shows that taking zinc sulfate 660 mg daily for 3 months does not improve the size or frequency of canker sore ulcers when compared with control (6592). However, another clinical study in patients with recurrent sores and low or normal zinc levels shows that taking zinc sulfate 220 mg daily for 1 month reduces recurrence of sores when compared with placebo (86964). Reasons for conflicting results are unclear. Zinc might be beneficial when used in a muco-adhesive formulation. A small clinical study in patients with canker sores shows that taking a muco-adhesive zinc sulfate 5 mg tablet three times daily for 7 days reduces pain and speeds up healing when compared with placebo (104048).
• Cataracts. Oral zinc has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking zinc orally in combination with antioxidant vitamins does not seem to help treat or prevent cataracts. Taking elemental zinc 80 mg plus vitamin C 500 mg, vitamin E 400 IU, and beta-carotene 15 mg daily does not seem to have any effect on the development or progression of age-related lens opacities (cataracts) or the need for cataract surgery in well-nourished people 55-80 years of age. However, it is unknown whether earlier intervention and/or a longer period of treatment with supplements would have any effect on cataracts (7304).
• Chemotherapy-induced acral erythema. It is unclear if oral zinc reduces the severity of acral erythema induced in patients treated with the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) treatment regorafenib. Details: A small study in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing treatment with regorafenib shows that taking zinc gluconate 78 mg twice daily reduces the proportion of patients with more severe acral erythema when compared with control. Though there is no association in the zinc treatment group, lower serum zinc levels seem to correlate with more severe acral erythema in the control group, suggesting a possible role of zinc deficiency in the pathogenesis of acral erythema (112472). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of blinding.
• Chemotherapy-related fatigue. It is unclear if oral zinc improves symptoms in patients with fatigue due to chemotherapy. Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing 4 or more cycles of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer shows that taking zinc 70 mg daily for 16 weeks does not improve fatigue or quality of life when compared with placebo (97141).
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Oral zinc has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in females with CFS shows that taking zinc 10 mg as zinc sulfate plus melatonin 1 mg daily for 16 weeks modestly reduces self-reported symptoms of physical fatigue when compared with placebo. However, there was no effect on cognitive or psychological symptoms, sleep, or symptoms of anxiety or depression (106241). This study may not have been adequately powered to detect differences between groups.
• Cirrhosis. It is unclear if zinc is beneficial for reducing cirrhosis-related mortality. Details: A meta-analysis of four small clinical trials shows that zinc supplementation does not seem to reduce mortality in patients with cirrhosis when compared with control (104054). This finding is limited due to the heterogeneity and small size of the available studies.
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if zinc is beneficial for cognitive function. Details: A very small clinical study in adults with overweight and obesity shows that taking supplemental zinc 30 mg daily for 12 weeks improves some measures of cognitive function and executive processing but does not improve verbal fluency when compared with placebo (112471). Zinc has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical trial in healthy adults shows that taking a specific product containing a combination of zinc 9 mg, Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Bifidobacterium longum, and other ingredients (Puraflor, GSK Consumer Healthcare, Milano, Italy) orally daily for 4 weeks does not affect cognitive performance during acute stress when compared with placebo (110923).
• Colorectal adenoma. Oral zinc has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study shows that taking a combination supplement containing zinc 30 mg, selenium 200 mcg (as l-selenomethionine), vitamin A 2 mg (as retinol), vitamin C 180 mg, and vitamin E 30 mg (as D-a-tocopherol acetate) by mouth daily for 5 years or until the recurrence of an adenoma reduces the risk of recurrent large-bowel adenomas by approximately 40% when compared with placebo (92903). It is not clear if the benefit is due to zinc, other supplements, or the combination.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for reducing colorectal cancer risk. Details: Population research has found that increased intake of zinc is associated with a 17% to 20% reduced risk of colorectal cancer (90213,90220).
• Congenital heart disease. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for reducing the risk of congenital heart defects. Details: An observational study in pregnant adults has found that consuming the recommended nutritional intake of zinc may be associated with a lower risk of total congenital heart defects in infants, including atrial and ventricular septal defects, when compared with low zinc intake. This association appears to persist despite copper or selenium intake (108445).
• Critical illness (trauma). It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for critically ill patients. Details: A meta-analysis of two small randomized clinical trials in adults with head trauma shows that supplementing zinc, given as 120 mg elemental zinc orally daily or 12 mg elemental zinc intravenously daily for 15 days to 3 months, regardless of serum zinc levels, does not improve the risk of 30-day mortality when compared with control (111290). However, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Dementia. Although there is interest in using oral zinc for dementia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of zinc for this condition.
• Diabetic foot ulcers. Although there is interest in using oral zinc for diabetic foot ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of zinc for this condition.
• Diabetic neuropathy. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Details: A small clinical study in patients with poorly-controlled diabetic neuropathy shows that taking zinc sulfate 660 mg daily for 6 weeks improves motor nerve conduction velocity and reduces fasting and postprandial blood sugar when compared to baseline (86933). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of statistical comparison to the control group.
• Down syndrome. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for improving immune function in people with this condition. Details: A very small clinical study in Down syndrome patients with zinc deficiency shows that taking zinc sulfate 1 mg/kg daily for 2 months seems to improve immune function and reduce recurrent infections when compared with baseline (87289). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group. Another small clinical study in children with Down syndrome shows that zinc 25-50 mg daily for 6 months does not improve immune function when compared with placebo (87278). Reasons for the discrepancies may be related to the dose of zinc or zinc status at baseline.
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in patients with dysmenorrhea. Details: Preliminary clinical research in females aged 13 to 21 years with primary dysmenorrhea shows that taking zinc sulfate 40 mg orally daily for the first 3 days of menstruation for three cycles reduces mean pain scores by 51% when compared with placebo (111446).
• Epilepsy. There is limited evidence on the oral use of zinc in children with intractable seizures. Details: A small clinical study in children with intractable epilepsy shows that taking elemental zinc 1 mg/kg daily as zinc sulfate heptahydrate for 6 months reduces seizures when compared with placebo. About 31% of children taking zinc experienced a 50% decrease in seizure frequency, compared to only 5% of children taking placebo (96078).
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in patients with erectile dysfunction. Details: A moderate-sized, open-label clinical study in adults with mild-to-moderate ED shows that taking a specific combination supplement (Icarifil, Anvest Health S.p.A) containing zinc 15 mg, L-carnitine, L-citrulline, tribulus, and other ingredients daily for 3 months improves patient-reported erectile function when compared to baseline. Additionally, taking the supplement with tadalafil improves some, but not all, patient-reported assessments of erectile function when compared with taking tadalafil alone (114989). It is unclear if this effect is due to zinc, other ingredients, or the combination. Additionally, the interpretation of these results is limited by poor methodology, including the use of per-protocol analysis and lack of a placebo group.
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for esophageal cancer prevention. Details: Population research in Chinese and Iranian patients has found that low intake of zinc is associated with an increased risk of esophageal squamous cell cancer (17205,87059). However, other population research in patients from America, Europe, or Asia has found that dietary zinc intake is not associated with esophageal cancer risk (90213).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for reducing fatigue in older individuals. Details: A clinical study in adults 50 years and older, some with below-normal levels of zinc at baseline, shows that taking zinc 30 mg daily for 70 days improves subjective fatigue when compared with no intervention (105675). The validity of this finding is limited due to a lack of placebo control and potential performance bias. Additionally, it is unclear whether baseline zinc status alters the benefits of zinc supplementation.
• Fecal incontinence. Topical zinc has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in females with fecal incontinence shows that topically applying an ointment containing zinc sulfate 1% and aluminum sulfate 5% to the anal canal mucosa three times daily for 4 weeks improves symptoms approximately twice as much as a placebo ointment. Quality of life related to the incontinence also improved (90219).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if dietary zinc is beneficial for gastric cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary zinc intake is not associated with a decreased risk of gastric cancer (90213).
• Head and neck cancer. It is unclear if oral zinc improves survival in patients with head and neck cancers. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with head and neck cancers shows that zinc supplementation does not improve disease-free or metastasis-free survival rates after 3 years when compared with placebo (87103).
• Hepatic encephalopathy. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for reducing the severity of hepatic encephalopathy or preventing recurrence. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies, as well as some individual clinical studies, show that short-term zinc supplementation improves cognitive function and possibly quality of life in patients with hepatic encephalopathy. These findings are based on results from the number connection test and other tests (87377,90202,106227). One study in patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy used zinc bisglycinate 75 mg three times daily, providing elemental zinc 45 mg daily for 12 weeks (106227). However, other preliminary clinical research shows that short-term zinc supplementation does not improve hepatic encephalopathy severity when compared with placebo when assessed using Conn's index, which includes evaluation of mental state, asterixis (flapping tremor), number connection test, electroencephalogram (EEG) record, and plasma ammonia (87144). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that zinc sulfate supplementation does not reduce encephalopathy recurrence (90202). Based on these results, zinc supplementation may marginally improve cognitive function in hepatic encephalopathy patients, but it does not appear to improve disease severity or reduce the risk of recurrence.
• HIV/AIDS-related diarrhea. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for preventing diarrhea in adult HIV patients. Details: Short-term zinc supplementation does not appear to TREAT diarrhea in adult HIV patients with persistent diarrhea. Clinical research shows that taking zinc 50 mg twice daily for 7 days does not reduce the duration of HIV-related diarrhea when compared with placebo (87055). However, zinc supplementation may help PREVENT HIV-related diarrhea when administered long-term. Clinical research shows that taking elemental zinc 12-15 mg daily for 18 months reduces the rate of diarrhea by about half when compared with placebo in adult HIV patients with zinc deficiency (87216). In HIV-infected children, clinical research shows that taking elemental zinc 10 mg daily for 6 months can reduce the occurrence of diarrhea by 49% when compared with placebo (82377). However, administering zinc in combination with vitamin A until 2 years of age does not reduce the occurrence of diarrhea when compared with vitamin A alone in HIV-infected children (82417).
• HIV/AIDS-related opportunistic infections. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in opportunistic infections in patients with HIV/AIDs. Details: A small clinical study in patients with AIDS shows that taking zinc supplements orally in combination with zidovudine (AZT, Retrovir) might reduce opportunistic infections of Pneumocystis carinii and Candida when compared with taking zidovudine without zinc (6566).
• Human papillomavirus (HPV). It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for preventing relapse in patients with vulvar warts or for treating HPV infections and cervical lesions in patients with abnormal cervical cytology. Details: One small clinical study in patients with vulvar warts shows that taking zinc sulfate 400 mg daily for 8 weeks in addition to topical treatments including podophyllin 20%, imiquimod 5%, or cryotherapy, does not affect the duration of response, but does reduce the relapse rate by approximately 66% after 6 months, when compared with topical treatments alone (90190). Additionally, a small, open-label study in zinc-sufficient females with HPV shows that taking zinc sulfate 220 mg twice daily for 3 months reduces the odds of persistent HPV infection by 87% and improves the resolution of pre-existing cervical lesions when compared with no treatment (109456).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral zinc reduces blood pressure in normotensive or hypertensive patients. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical trials shows that taking zinc reduces systolic blood pressure by about 1.5 mmHg, but does not reduce diastolic blood pressure, when compared with placebo. Response did not differ with the dosage of zinc or duration of supplementation. Only one study evaluated patients with hypertension; other patient populations included those with type 2 diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, pre-diabetes, obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and patients on dialysis (104052). More research in patients with hypertension is needed to determine if zinc is beneficial in this population.
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). While some conflicting evidence exists, several small clinical studies suggest that oral zinc may improve glycemic control in patients with prediabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of three low-quality studies in patients with prediabetes suggests that taking zinc sulfate 20-30 mg, alone or in combination with lysine and vitamin C, for 6-12 months reduces fasting blood glucose and postprandial glucose when compared with control (105682). Furthermore, a small clinical study in patients with prediabetes shows that taking zinc gluconate 30 mg daily for 90 days improves glycemic parameters when compared with placebo. All study participants were also instructed to increase physical activity and start a calorie-restricted diet (105391). However, another small clinical study in patients with prediabetes shows that taking zinc gluconate 30 mg daily for 12 months does not improve glycemic parameters when compared with placebo (109454). The available research has been conducted in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Iran, and Australia; it is unclear if these findings are generalizable to other geographic locations.
• Intestinal parasite infection. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in patients with intestinal parasitic infections. Details: Zinc supplementation may help TREAT infection from Schistosoma mansoniin, but not other parasites, in children in developing countries. Results from one clinical study show that taking oral zinc sulfate 30-50 mg for 12 months reduces the intensity of Schistosoma mansoniin infection in children, as measured by number of eggs per gram in feces, when compared with placebo (87495). However, supplementation with zinc does not appear to reduce the intensity of Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichiuris trichura, nor Giardia lamblia infection in children (6586). Furthermore, preliminary clinical research suggests that supplementation with zinc may increase the duration of Entamoeba histolytica infection in children (87099). There are also inconsistent results regarding the effects of zinc in PREVENTING intestinal parasite infections. Some clinical research shows that taking zinc in combination with vitamin A reduces the incidence of Giardia lamblia infections when compared with placebo (87099). However, zinc supplementation does not appear to prevent intestinal infections by Ascaris lumbricoides, Schistosoma haematobium, nor Schistosoma mansoniin (87099,87495).
• Kidney failure. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for patients on hemodialysis who have resistance to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). Details: Zinc deficiency is thought to play a role in ESA-resistant anemia in patients with kidney failure. A small clinical trial in patients on hemodialysis with low zinc levels shows that taking zinc acetate hydrate, usually 25mg or 50 mg daily, for 12 months increases plasma levels of zinc and modestly reduces the required weekly dose of ESAs when compared with placebo. However, there was no effect on hemoglobin levels (109781).
• Leukemia. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for improving weight maintenance in children and adolescents with leukemia. Details: A small clinical study in children and adolescents with acute leukemia shows that taking zinc 2 mg/kg (as an amino acid salt) in two divided doses daily for 60 days doubles weight gain and reduces infection rate by approximately 60% when compared with placebo. However, zinc supplementation does not appear to improve nutritional status (90204).
• Liver cancer. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for preventing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Details: In patients treated for hepatitis C, the presence of hepatic fibrosis increases the risk for development of HCC, and is also associated with low plasma zinc levels. In a retrospective analysis of patients with a sustained virological response to hepatitis C therapy, those taking oral zinc supplements for at least 6 months had approximately half the risk of developing HCC when compared with those not taking zinc. Maintaining a serum zinc level above 90 mcg/dL seems to reduce the risk for HCC (106904).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if increased dietary zinc intake is beneficial for reducing the risk of lung cancer. Details: Population research suggests that the highest dietary intake of zinc is associated with a 32% reduced risk of lung cancer when compared with the lowest intake (106235). Additionally, another large epidemiological cancer screening trial with a mean follow-up of 12.2 years suggests that dietary intake of zinc is protective against lung cancer, with the highest quartile of dietary intake showing the greatest benefit. However, this protective effect was not found for supplemental intake of zinc (112096).
• Male infertility. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for infertility in males. Details: Some preliminary clinical research shows that taking zinc sulfate 66 mg daily increases sperm count, testosterone levels, and the incidence of pregnancy in idiopathic infertile men with low testosterone levels (9334,87430). Another clinical study shows that taking zinc sulfate 66 mg daily can improve sperm morphology by approximately 33% when compared to baseline in men with a grade III varicocele (90194). However, not all research agrees. One clinical study shows that taking elemental zinc 30 mg with folic acid 5 mg daily for 6 months does not improve sperm morphology or pregnancy rates when compared with placebo in infertile men (102085). It is possible the lower dose used in this study was insufficient to produce the beneficial effects observed in earlier research. Zinc supplementation has also been studied as part of combination therapy. A retrospective study in males with or without varicocele-related infertility has found that taking a specific combination product containing zinc 10 mg, L-carnitine fumarate 1725 mg, acetyl-L-carnitine 500 mg, vitamin C 90 mg, coenzyme Q10 20 mg, folic acid 0.2 mg, selenium 0.05 mg, and vitamin B12 0.015 mg (Proxeed Plus, Sigma-Tau) orally twice daily for 6 months improves sperm count, sperm concentration, and sperm motility when compared with baseline. Improvements in semen parameters were greatest in subjects with more severe varicoceles. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group (111296). There is also interest in using zinc to improve results of in vitro fertilization (IVF). A small clinical study in couples undergoing IVF suggests that infertile male partners who take a specific combination product (Menevit) containing zinc and other antioxidants seem to have an increased rate of viable pregnancies when compared with placebo (87087). However, it's unclear if the benefit can be attributed to zinc, other antioxidants, or the combination.
• Melasma. It is unclear if topical zinc reduces melasma severity. Details: A small clinical study shows that applying a topical solution containing zinc sulfate 10% once daily for 2 months is less effective at reducing melasma severity when compared with hydroquinone 4% (90232).
• Menopausal symptoms. It is unclear if oral zinc improves sexual function after menopause. Details: A single clinical trial shows that taking zinc sulfate 110 mg daily for 6 weeks modestly improves testosterone levels and sexual function, including desire, arousal, satisfaction, and pain, after menopause when compared with placebo (106228).
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in patients with migraine. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with migraine show that taking zinc sulfate 200 mg or zinc gluconate 15 mg daily for 8-12 weeks modestly reduces migraine severity and frequency when compared with placebo (104040,105684). Both studies were conducted in Iran; it is unclear if these findings are generalizable to other geographic locations.
• Nasopharyngeal cancer. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in patients with this type of cancer. Details: A small clinical study in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer shows that zinc supplementation 75 mg daily for 2 months may improve disease-free survival rates after 5 years when compared with placebo (87163).
• Neonatal jaundice. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for neonatal jaundice. Details: There is contradictory evidence about the effects of oral zinc in infants with hyperbilirubinemia. Two small clinical studies in infants with idiopathic neonatal hyperbilirubinemia show that receiving oral zinc sulfate 5 mg twice daily for 5-7 days does not affect levels of total bilirubin, the required duration of phototherapy, or the duration of hospitalization, when compared with placebo (90212,104814). However, a larger clinical trial in preterm infants receiving phototherapy and zinc 1.2 mg/kg daily as zinc sulfate heptahydrate, via either orogastric or nasogastric tube for 10 days, serum bilirubin levels were modestly decreased only on days 8-10 when compared with phototherapy alone (106242). Additionally, a second larger clinical trial in infants with idiopathic hyperbilirubinemia shows that receiving oral zinc sulfate (Zinc sulfate, Ramofarmin Company) 1 mg/kg daily for 3 days reduces total bilirubin levels and duration of phototherapy when compared with placebo; additionally length of hospitalization is reduced by less than 1 day (115631). The reason for these discrepant findings is unclear but may be attributed to variations in baseline characteristics, treatment duration, and dose.
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in patients with NAFLD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with NAFLD shows that following a calorie-restricted diet and taking zinc 30 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces certain liver enzymes, but does not improve steatosis or reduce weight, when compared with taking placebo and following a calorie-restricted diet (104046).
• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for non-Hodgkin lymphoma prevention. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of zinc is associated with a 42% decreased odds of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma (87048).
• Obesity. Small studies suggest that oral zinc does not reduce weight or calorie intake in people with overweight or obesity. Details: A very small clinical study in adults with overweight or obesity shows that taking supplemental zinc 30 mg daily for 12 weeks does not reduce body weight, body mass index (BMI), calorie intake, or macronutrient intake when compared with placebo (112471). Additionally, clinical research in adults with overweight or obesity shows that taking zinc gluconate 25 mg and L-selenomethionine 200 mcg once daily for 8 weeks does not improve BMI, total body fat, or fat free mass when compared with placebo (111448).
• Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). It is unclear if oral zinc reduces symptoms in patients with OCD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with OCD shows that taking zinc sulfate 200 mg twice daily with fluoxetine 20 mg daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces the severity of OCD symptoms when compared with taking placebo with fluoxetine (90223).
• Oral mucositis. It is unclear if oral or topical zinc prevents oral mucositis due to chemotherapy. Some small clinical studies suggest that oral zinc might prevent mucositis due to radiotherapy. Details: Two small clinical studies in adults with leukemia and other cancers shows that taking zinc sulfate 220 mg three times daily for 14 days or until the end of chemotherapy treatment reduces oral mucositis and pain intensity when compared with placebo (90191,98132). However, smaller doses have not shown benefit. A small clinical study in children and adolescents with leukemia shows that taking zinc 2 mg/kg daily (up to 60 mg daily) in two divided doses does not affect chemotherapy-induced mucositis when compared with placebo (90204). An unblinded clinical study in children and adolescents aged 8-16 years with recently diagnosed leukemia shows that taking zinc gluconate 50 mg (7 mg elemental zinc) daily does not significantly reduce the incidence or duration of oral mucositis when compared with a control group not receiving zinc (104816). Zinc also doesn't seem to be beneficial with high-dose chemotherapy. A small clinical study in adolescents and adults receiving high-dose chemotherapy prior to undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) suggests that taking zinc sulfate 220 mg (50 mg elemental zinc) twice daily, beginning one day prior to the chemotherapy regimen and continuing for 3 weeks, does not affect the severity, duration, or onset of mucositis when compared with placebo (90215). Other preliminary clinical research in children aged 3-18 years receiving chemotherapy for leukemia or other cancer also shows that taking zinc 1 mg/kg orally daily for 14 days, beginning on the first day of chemotherapy, does not reduce the incidence or severity of mucositis when compared with placebo (111447). Topical zinc has also been investigated for radiation-induced or chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. In two clinical studies, using 7.5 mL of a mouthwash containing zinc chloride 0.2% twice for 2 minutes every 8 hours for 3 weeks modestly reduces the incidence and severity of oral mucositis, and improves quality of life, when compared with a placebo mouthwash (106232,109690). In one study, the average patient weight was higher in the group using the mouthwash containing zinc (106232). Other preliminary clinical research in adults with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy treatment, consisting of at least 30 Gy radiation exposure shows that using zinc sulfate 1% mouthwash, 5 mL three times daily for 6 weeks, beginning on the first day of radiation therapy, moderately improves oral mucositis severity and pain scores when compared with chlorhexidine 0.2% or placebo mouthwash (111291). Taking zinc orally might be beneficial in radiation-induced oral mucositis. A small clinical study in patients with head and neck tumors shows that taking zinc sulfate, providing 150 mg elemental zinc, daily starting at the first day of radiation therapy and ending at 6 weeks, reduces the severity of mucositis and prolongs the onset of mucositis when compared with placebo (86981). Another clinical study in patients with head and neck cancer shows that taking zinc sulfate 150 mg daily during and after chemoradiotherapy treatment, consisting of a total 69.5 Gy radiation exposure and cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly, is associated with less severe mucositis when compared with placebo (105677).
• Osteoporosis. It is unclear if oral zinc improves bone density in patients with osteoporosis. Details: Population research has found that reduced zinc intake and lower zinc serum levels seem to be associated with lower bone mineral density (BMD) (6920,14410). In elderly patients with at least marginal zinc deficiency who are taking standard therapy for osteoporosis, preliminary clinical research shows that taking zinc acetate dihydrate (Nobelzin, Nobelpharma) providing elemental zinc 25 mg twice daily for 12 months increases BMD when compared with baseline. Increases in serum zinc were associated with improvements in BMD. However, it is unclear if increases in BMD were significant when compared with placebo (106230). It is also unclear if zinc improves BMD in patients without zinc deficiency. A small clinical study in healthy postmenopausal adults suggests that taking zinc in combination with copper, manganese, and calcium might slow bone loss when compared with placebo (1994). It is not clear if this effect is due to zinc, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if oral zinc reduces overall mortality in young children. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in children under the age of five years shows that supplementation with zinc in daily doses of at least 10 mg reduces the risk of all-cause mortality by 16% when compared with either placebo, other vitamin and/or mineral supplementation, or no supplementation. The risk of mortality was reduced by 54% when children took zinc for up to one year, but overall mortality was not reduced in studies lasting at least one year (106239).
• Periodontitis. Oral zinc has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with moderate or advanced periodontitis shows that taking a combination supplement containing zinc 3.75 mg, alpha-lipoic acid, coenzyme Q10, cranberry extract, grapeseed extract, selenium, vitamin C, and vitamin E twice daily for 8 weeks in addition to standard nonsurgical therapy does not reduce periodontal indices including bleeding on probing, gingival recession, plaque index, or inflammation when compared with placebo (111708).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in patients with PCOS. Details: A small clinical study in adults taking metformin for PCOS shows that also taking zinc sulfate 220 mg (50 mg elemental zinc) daily for 8 weeks improves hair loss and facial growth, but not acne, when compared with placebo (96071).
• Postoperative sore throat. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for postoperative sore throat. Details: Clinical research shows that dissolving a lozenge containing zinc 40 mg as zinc sulfate in the mouth in the 30 minutes before surgery involving endotracheal intubation reduces the incidence of postoperative sore throat by 58% when compared with placebo lozenges. It also seems to reduce the severity of postoperative sore throat that does occur (97138). Other clinical research in adults undergoing a procedure that required endotracheal intubation shows that using a preoperative 30-mL gargle containing zinc 40 mg does not affect sore throat scores when compared with magnesium sulphate 250 mg or budesonide 200 mcg gargles (114763).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral zinc prevents postpartum depression after a Cesarean section (C-section). Details: A small observational study in pregnant patients with anemia who underwent C-section has found that taking zinc sulfate 100 mg daily for 4 days after surgery is associated with a 75% reduction in the odds of developing postpartum depression when compared with no supplementation (109452).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). It is unclear if oral zinc improves symptoms in patients with PMS. Details: A small clinical study in female college students shows that taking elemental zinc 30 mg daily for 3 months improves quality of life, but not quality of sleep, when compared with placebo (104049).
• Preterm labor. It is unclear if oral zinc reduces the risk of preterm labor. Details: Observational research has found that low dietary intake of zinc during pregnancy is associated with an increased likelihood of preterm deliveries (87471). Also, most meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking zinc supplements during pregnancy modestly reduces the risk of preterm birth (106231). However, one large meta-analysis of 22 clinical studies shows that zinc supplementation during pregnancy seems to have little or no benefit for reducing the risk of preterm birth when compared with control (105679). Zinc supplementation also does not seem to reduce the risk of stillbirth, neonatal death, spontaneous abortion, or premature rupture of membranes (97142,105679,106231).
• Prostatitis. It is unclear if oral zinc improves symptoms in men with chronic prostatitis. Details: A clinical study in men with chronic prostatitis shows that taking zinc sulfate 220 mg daily along with prazosin 2 mg daily for 12 weeks does not improve difficulty urinating or quality of life, but does seem to improve pain, when compared with prazosin alone (90210). The validity of this study was limited by a significant dropout rate.
• Pruritus. There is limited evidence on the oral use of zinc for reducing pruritis in hemodialysis patients. Details: A small clinical study in end-stage renal disease patients with hemodialysis-associated pruritus shows that taking zinc sulfate 220 mg twice daily for 2 months reduces pruritus severity when compared with placebo (90218).
• Psoriatic arthritis. It is unclear if oral zinc improves psoriatic arthritis symptoms. Details: Two small clinical trials in patients with psoriatic arthritis show that taking zinc orally, alone or in combination with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), does not seem to reduce pain or improve function when compared with control (6514,6515).
• Respiratory tract infections. It is unclear if oral zinc reduces respiratory tract infections in children. Details: An open-label study in children aged 6 months to 5 years with zinc deficiency shows that taking zinc sulfate 20 mg orally once daily for 2 weeks reduces the number of episodes and the mean duration of upper and lower respiratory tract infections over 6 months of follow-up when compared with the 6 months prior to zinc supplementation (104815). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Rosacea. It is unclear of oral zinc improves symptoms of rosacea or quality of life. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking zinc sulfate 440 mg in two divided doses daily for 90 days does not improve quality of life or symptoms associated with rosacea when compared with placebo (90195).
• Seizures. It is unclear if oral zinc reduces recurrent febrile seizures in children. Details: Although some individual preliminary clinical research disagrees (96069), a meta-analysis of generally low-quality research in children under 5 years of age with a previous febrile seizure shows that taking zinc sulfate 1-2 mg/kg or 20 mg daily for 6-12 months does not reduce febrile seizure recurrence when compared with placebo (106237). Also, a small clinical study shows that taking zinc does not increase the time to first febrile seizure recurrence (96069).
• Sepsis. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in pediatric or adult patients with sepsis. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in children under the age of five years shows that supplementation with zinc reduces the risk of sepsis mortality by 57% when compared with either placebo, other vitamin and/or mineral supplementation, or no supplementation (106239). Also, a small clinical study in newborns with sepsis shows that giving zinc sulfate monohydrate 3 mg/kg twice daily for 10 days along with antibiotics reduces the likelihood of neurological abnormalities, such as those related to posture, behavior, and reflexes, by 70% when compared with antibiotics alone. Mortality and length of hospital stay were not improved, but the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference in these parameters (96077). Another study in preterm infants with late-onset sepsis (developing at least 72 hours after birth), shows that giving 1.4 mg/kg elemental zinc daily orally for 10 days in addition to antibiotics reduces the number of infants with unresolved sepsis at 10 days, and reduces C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels, when compared with giving antibiotics alone (104819). A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in infants less than 4 months old shows that administering zinc 1-3 mg/kg daily for 1-18 weeks may reduce the rate of infant mortality and treatment failure when compared with placebo or control, but does not seem to prevent sepsis or improve sepsis-related mortality (108444). Additionally, zinc has been evaluated in adults. A single-center observational study in adults with sepsis found that administering zinc orally or enterally in various doses, ranging from less than 15 mg to greater than 50 mg daily, does not improve survival rates or reduce the length of stay in the intensive care unit (115630).
• Shigellosis. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in patients with acute shigellosis from food poisoning. Details: A small clinical study in malnourished children with acute shigellosis (food poisoning) shows that administering a multivitamin syrup containing elemental zinc 20 mg daily for 2 weeks, in addition to standard treatment, can improve recovery time and reduce the number of diarrhea episodes when compared with multivitamin syrup without elemental zinc (87088).
• Sleep deprivation. Oral zinc has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in sleep-deprived recreational athletes shows that taking a combination of zinc 90 mg, magnesium 1350 mg, and vitamin B6 31.5 mg orally for 3 nights at bedtime does not change sleep quality, subjective sleepiness, mood, or fatigue when compared with placebo (113655).
• Substance use disorder. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for substance use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with opioid use disorder that were being treated with methadone shows that taking zinc sulfate, containing 12 mg zinc, orally daily for 3 months moderately improves relapse prevention scores, including drug use and drug craving scores, when compared with control. Taking zinc also modestly improved stress and anxiety scores (111293).
• Tonsillopharyngitis. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in patients with tonsillopharyngitis. Details: A moderate-sized, open-label clinical study in pediatric patients aged 3 to 10 years with acute tonsillopharyngitis shows that taking a specific combination solution (PediaFlù, Pediatrica S.r.l.) containing zinc (age dependent doses ranging from 2 to 4 mg), honey, propolis, and pelargonium sidoides daily for 6 days along with standard of care reduces tonsilitis severity scores when compared with standard care alone; however, this improvement is not clinically significant. (115632). It is not clear if these effects are due to zinc, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Traumatic brain injury (TBI). There is limited evidence on the parenteral use of zinc for closed head injury. Details: A small clinical study shows that administering zinc parenterally immediately following severe closed head injury seems to improve the rate of neurological recovery when compared with standard therapy (2696).
• Tuberculosis. It is unclear if oral zinc can improve outcomes in patients receiving tuberculosis treatment. Details: Low levels of zinc are common in patients with tuberculosis. In patients newly diagnosed with tuberculosis and using anti-tuberculosis treatment, some clinical research shows that taking zinc 50 mg daily as zinc sulfate for 6 months increases the number of patients with negative sputum smears by 50% to 80% within the first 6 weeks of treatment when compared with placebo. However, there were no differences in the number of patients with negative smears after this time point. There were also improvements in some liver function enzyme levels after 2 months, but not 6 months, when compared with placebo (106238). However, other clinical research shows that taking zinc 15-90 mg daily for 2-6 months does not improve cure rates or sputum smear conversions when compared with placebo. However, when combined with vitamin A, serum levels of vitamin A, zinc, and hemoglobin were modestly improved and there was a modest increase in sputum smear conversions (109754).
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial in children with UTI. Details: A low-quality, clinical study in children aged 3-12 years hospitalized for a UTI and receiving intravenous antibiotic treatment shows that taking zinc 1 mg/kg daily for 14 days reduces the duration of dysuria, urinary frequency, and urgency when compared with intravenous antibiotics alone. Zinc does not improve fever or the time to negative urine culture (96081). However, this study did not demonstrate that treatment groups were equal at baseline.
• Venous leg ulcers. It is unclear if oral or topical zinc is beneficial for leg ulcer healing. Details: Two small studies in elderly patients with leg ulcers suggest that using a zinc saline solution on a wound dressing or applying zinc oxide to a dressing might improve healing of leg ulcers (2694,6901). However, oral zinc supplementation does not seem to be beneficial. A meta-analysis of four small clinical trials in patients with venous leg ulcers shows that taking zinc orally does not improve healing when compared with placebo (104079).
• Vertigo. Oral zinc has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels less than 20 ng/mL shows that taking a specific combination product containing zinc 7.5 mg, alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg, L-carnosine 165 mg, curcumin 100 mg, piperine 1 mg, cholecalciferol 800 units, vitamin B2 0.8 mg, and vitamin B6 1 mg (Vertistop D, Difass) orally daily for 6 months moderately reduces the number of vertigo relapse episodes when compared with control. However, in patients with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels greater than 20 ng/mL that took a specific combination product containing zinc 7.5 mg, alanine 600 mg, L-carnosine 165 mg, curcumin 100 mg and piperine 1 mg (Vertistop L, Difass) orally daily for 6 months there was no difference in relapse episodes when compared with control (111294). It is unclear if this effect is due to zinc, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Water warts. It is unclear if oral zinc is beneficial for the treatment of water warts in children. Details: In children with water warts, preliminary clinical research shows that taking zinc sulfate heptahydrate (as Zinco syrup) for 2 months results in lesion resolution in 70% of patients when compared with baseline. Lesion resolution occurred in an additional 13% of patients in the month after treatment completion, with no recurrence in any of these children over the next 9 months. Zinc 3 mg daily was used in children up to 3 years of age, and 5 mg daily was used in older children (106234). Due to the lack of a comparator group, it is unclear if these outcomes are due to zinc or the natural resolution of the condition.
• Wound healing. Topical zinc might be beneficial for the healing of uncomplicated wounds. Details: A small clinical study shows that applying zinc chloride solution, standardized to contain zinc 20 mcg/mL, twice daily improves wound healing when compared with saline solution in patients with uncomplicated, skin wounds. However, when zinc is administered as a component of an insulin product (Humulin, Eli Lilly and Company), it seems to be more effective than zinc chloride alone (90192).
• Wrinkled skin. Topical zinc has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A topical preparation containing 10% vitamin C as L-ascorbic acid and acetyl tyrosine, zinc sulfate, sodium hyaluronate, and bioflavonoids (Cellex-C High Potency Serum) applied to photo-aged facial skin for 3 months seems to improve fine and coarse wrinkling, yellowing and sallowness, roughness, and skin tone when compared with placebo (6155). More evidence is needed to rate zinc for these uses.

(Read more about ZINC)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Biotin has been safely used in doses up to 300 mg daily for up to 6 months. A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established (1900,6243,95662,102965). ...when applied topically as cosmetic products at concentrations of 0.0001% to 0.6% biotin (19344).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used intramuscularly and appropriately (8468,111366).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Biotin has been safely used at adequate intake doses of 5-25 mcg daily for up to 6 months (173,6243,19347,19348,111365). A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Biotin has been safely used at the adequate intake (AI) dose of 30 mcg daily during pregnancy and 35 mcg daily during lactation. It has also been used in supplemental doses of up to 300 mcg daily (6243,7878). A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established.

(Read more about BIOTIN)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or parenterally and appropriately. Folic acid has been safely used in amounts below the tolerable upper intake level (UL). The UL for folic acid is based only on supplemental folic acid and is expressed in mcg folic acid. Dietary folate is not included in UL calculations, as dietary folate consumption has not been associated with adverse effects. The UL for folic acid in adults is 1000 mcg (6241). In cases of megaloblastic anemia resulting from folate deficiency or malabsorption disorders such as sprue, oral doses of 1-5 mg per day can also be used safely until hematologic recovery is documented, as long as vitamin B12 levels are routinely measured (6241,7725,8739).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (L-5-MTHF), the reduced form of folate, is used orally and appropriately, short-term. L-5-MTHF has been used with apparent safety at a dose of 416 mcg daily for 16 weeks (104913,104914) and a dose of 113 mcg daily for 24 weeks (104920). A specific L-5-MTHF product (Metafolin, Eprova) has been used with apparent safety at a dose of 1.3 mg daily for 12 weeks (104912).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in large doses, long-term. Clinical research shows that taking folic acid daily in doses of 800 mcg to 1200 mcg for 3-10 years significantly increases the risk of developing cancer and adverse cardiovascular effects compared to placebo (12150,13482,16822,17041). Doses above 1 mg per day should also be avoided if possible to prevent precipitation or exacerbation of neuropathy related to vitamin B12 deficiency (6241,6242,6245). However, there is contradictory evidence suggesting that higher doses may not be harmful. There is some evidence that doses of 5 mg per day orally for up to 4 months can be used safely if vitamin B12 levels are routinely measured (7725). Also, other clinical research suggests that folic acid supplementation at doses up to 5 mg, usually in combination with vitamin B12, does not increase the risk of cancer when taken for 2-7 years (91312). Very high doses of 15 mg per day can cause significant central nervous system (CNS) and gastrointestinal side effects (505).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Folic acid has been safely used in children in amounts below the tolerable upper intake level (UL). The ULs for folic acid are based only on supplemental folic acid and are expressed in mcg folic acid. Dietary folate is not included in UL calculations, as dietary folate consumption has not been associated with adverse effects. The UL for children is: 1-3 years of age, 300 mcg; 4-8 years of age, 400 mcg; 9-13 years of age, 600 mcg; 14-18 years of age, 800 mcg (6241).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (L-5-MTHF), the reduced form of folate, is used orally and appropriately. One clinical study in infants aged 27 days and younger shows that consuming a formula containing L-5-MTHF (Metafolin, Merck & Cie) 10.4 mcg/100 mL daily has been used with apparent safety for up to 12 weeks (104918).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Folic acid 300-400 mcg is commonly used during pregnancy for prevention of neural tube defects (8739). Miscarriage rates and negative impacts on fetal growth have not been shown to increase with peri-conception supplemental folic acid intakes of 4 mg per day (91320,91322). However, other research shows that taking more than 5 mg per day during pregnancy may reduce development of cognitive, emotional, and motor skills in infants (91318). Also, the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of folic acid for pregnant or lactating women is 800 mcg daily for those 14-18 years of age and 1000 mcg daily for those 19 years and older (6241).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (L-5-MTHF), the reduced form of folate, is used orally and appropriately, short-term. L-5-MTHF has been used with apparent safety at a dose of 416 mcg daily for 16 weeks during lactation. Compared to folic acid, this form seems to further increase the folate concentration of red blood cells, but not breast milk (104913,104914).

(Read more about FOLIC ACID)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Iodine is safe in amounts that do not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 1100 mcg daily (7135,103070). Higher doses can be safely used with appropriate medical monitoring (2197,7080). In some regions of the world, such as Japan, daily dietary intake is estimated to be as high as 5,280-13,800 mcg without adverse outcomes (16747). ...when used topically and appropriately, as a 2% solution. A 2% iodine solution is an FDA-approved prescription product (15).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid prolonged use of doses exceeding the UL of 1100 mcg daily without proper medical supervision. There is concern that higher intake can increase the risk of side effects such as thyroid dysfunction, as well as thyroiditis, thyroid papillary cancer, thyrotoxicosis, and atrial fibrillation (7135,55962,56013). However, in some regions of the world such as Japan, daily dietary intake is estimated to be as high as 5,280-13,800 mcg without adverse outcomes (16747).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (7135). Iodine is safe in amounts that do not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 200 mcg daily for children 1-3 years, 300 mcg daily for children 4-8 years, 600 mcg daily for children 9-13 years, and 900 mcg daily for adolescents (7135). ...when used topically as a 2% solution (15). Iodine is an FDA-approved prescription product.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in doses exceeding the UL (7135,108709). Higher intake can cause thyroid dysfunction (7135) and may be associated with a modest reduction in intelligence (108709).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Iodine is safe in amounts that do not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 1100 mcg daily in those 18 years and older or 900 mcg daily in those 14-18 years of age (7135,103070). Iodine needs increase during pregnancy and lactation and adequate intakes should begin as soon as a patient is aware of the pregnancy, or earlier in areas of potential deficiency (17920). ...when used topically as a 2% solution (15). Iodine is an FDA-approved prescription product.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in doses exceeding the UL. Higher intake can cause thyroid dysfunction (7135). Also, higher intakes during pregnancy cause increased iodine levels in breast milk and infant blood samples. Higher iodine intake during pregnancy has also been associated with an increased risk of congenital hypothyroidism and reduced mental and physical development in the offspring (56089,91390,91394,91395).

(Read more about IODINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Oral manganese is safe when used in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 11 mg daily for adults 19 years and older (1994,7135). ...when used parenterally and appropriately. Parenteral manganese chloride and manganese sulfate are FDA-approved prescription products.

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in high doses. Doses exceeding 11 mg daily can cause significant adverse effects (7135). ...when used parenterally in moderate or high doses, long-term. Reports of neurotoxicity and Parkinson-like symptoms have been reported with parenteral nutrition manganese doses above 60 mcg daily. It is recommended that adults on long-term parenteral nutrition receive manganese in doses of no more than 55 mcg daily (99302).

LIKELY UNSAFE ...when inhaled in moderate doses, long-term. According to the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the permissible exposure limit (PEL) for manganese is 5 mg/m3. Exposure to higher amounts of manganese dust or fumes has been associated with central nervous system toxicity, Parkinson-like symptoms, and poor bone health (61296,102516).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Manganese is safe in children when used in daily doses less than the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 2 mg in children 1-3 years, 3 mg in children 4-8 years, 6 mg in children 9-13 years, and 9 mg in children 14-18 years (7135).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. Daily doses greater than the UL are associated with a greater risk of toxicity (7135).

CHILDREN: LIKELY UNSAFE
when inhaled at moderate doses, long-term. Exposure to high amounts of manganese dust has been associated with central nervous system toxicity and Parkinson-like symptoms (61296).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Manganese is safe when used in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 11 mg daily during pregnancy or lactation in those aged 19 or older. However, those under 19 years of age should limit doses to less than 9 mg daily (7135).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. Doses over the UL are associated with a greater risk of toxicity (7135). Additionally, observational research shows that adults with higher blood manganese levels have greater odds of delivering low birth weight or small for gestational age (SGA) male, but not female, infants (102515).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY UNSAFE
when inhaled at moderate doses, long-term. Manganese salts can cross the placenta, and animal research suggests that large amounts of manganese may be teratogenic (61296).

(Read more about MANGANESE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when prescription products are used orally and appropriately (12033). ...when niacinamide supplements are taken orally in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) set by the Institute of Medicine (IOM). The UL of niacinamide is 30 mg daily for adults 18 years of age and 35 mg daily for adults 19 years and older (6243).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally in doses greater than 30 mg but less than 900 mg daily. The European Food Safety Authority has set the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of niacinamide at 900 mg daily (104937). However, oral niacinamide has been safely used in doses up to 1500 mg daily for 12 weeks in some clinical trials (25561,94188,98940,107709,110502) and up to 1000 mg daily for 12 months in other trials (93362,113559,113560). ...when used topically and appropriately for up to 16 weeks (5940,93360,110497,110498,110501,113681,113683,113684).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Niacinamide has been safely used in children for up to 7 years in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) (4874,9957). The UL of niacinamide for children by age is: 1-3 years, 10 mg daily; 4-8 years, 15 mg daily; 9-13 years, 20 mg daily; 14-18 years, 30 mg daily (6243).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts that do not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for niacinamide. The UL of niacinamide during pregnancy and lactation is 30 mg daily for those 14-18 years of age and 35 mg daily for those 19 years and older (6243). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of larger oral doses of niacinamide or topical niacinamide; avoid using.

(Read more about NIACINAMIDE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. The pantothenic acid derivative calcium pantothenate has a generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status for use in food products (111258). While a tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established, pantothenic has been used in doses of 10-20 grams daily with apparent safety (15,6243,111258) ...when applied topically and appropriately, short-term. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel has concluded that pantothenic acid and its derivatives are safe for use in cosmetic products in concentrations up to 5.3% (111258). Gels or ointments containing a derivative of pantothenic acid, dexpanthenol, at concentrations of up to 5%, have been used safely for up to 30 days (67802,67806,67817).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when applied intranasally and appropriately, short-term. A dexpanthenol nasal spray has been used with apparent safety up to four times daily for 4 weeks (67826). ...when applied in the eyes appropriately, short-term. Dexpanthenol 5% eyedrops have been used with apparent safety for up to 28 days (67783). ...when injected intramuscularly and appropriately, short-term. Intramuscular injections of dexpanthenol 500 mg daily for up to 5 days or 250 mg weekly for up to 6 weeks have been used with apparent safety (67822,111366).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (15,6243). Calcium pantothenate is generally recognized as safe (GRAS) when used as a food additive and in infant formula (111258). However, a tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established (15,6243). ...when applied topically and appropriately (67795,105190,111262). Infant products containing pantothenic acid and its derivatives have been used safely in concentrations of up to 5% for infant shampoos and 2.5% for infant lotions and oils. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel has concluded that pantothenic acid and derivatives are safe for use in topical infant products. (111258).

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. The daily adequate intake (AI) during pregnancy is 6 mg (3094).

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. The daily adequate intake (AI) during lactation is 7 mg (3094).

(Read more about PANTOTHENIC ACID)