OxyElite Protein powder (various flavors) [Discontinued] by USPlabs

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Clinical research shows that feeding infants a casein peptide-based formula (Nutramigen or Progestimil, Mead Johnson), with or without breastmilk for 4-6 months, reduces the risk for atopic dermatitis during the first 9-24 months of life by 52% to 73% when compared to cow's milk formula (91655,91656,91658). The benefits of casein peptides appear to be most significant in infants with a family history of atopy (91655,91656). Additionally, the benefit of using a casein peptide-based formula during the first 4 months of life persists into childhood, with a 29% reduced risk of developing atopic dermatitis at 6 years of age when compared to cow's milk formula (91659,91660). Clinical research also shows that casein peptide formula is equally effective to hydrolyzed whey protein formula for reducing the risk for atopic dermatitis in infants (91657,91658,91659,91660,91661).
• Atopic disease. Clinical research in infants with a family history of atopy shows that taking a casein peptide-based formula (Nutramigen, Mead Johnson) during the first 4 months of life, or after weaning from breastmilk, reduces the risk for atopic manifestations during the first 12-18 months of life by 39% to 44% when compared with cow's milk formula (91656,91658). This benefit persists over time, with a 20% reduced risk for developing atopic disease at 6 years of age when compared to cow's milk formula (91660). However, it may not be beneficial in children without a family history of atopy. One large, ancillary clinical study in children at increased risk for development of type 1 diabetes, but not specifically at risk for atopy, shows that using an extensively hydrolyzed casein peptide formula (Nutramigen, Mead Johnson) in infancy for up to 6-8 months does not prevent persistent asthma, allergic rhinitis, or atopic dermatitis development when compared with using a conventional formula containing 80% intact cow's milk protein and 20% hydrolyzed milk protein (Enfamil, Mead Johnson). The validity of these findings is limited by the patient population and the unclear duration of follow up (106564).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Aging skin. A small clinical study in healthy, normotensive older Japanese adults shows that taking casein peptides isoleucine-proline-proline (IPP) and valine-proline-proline (VPP) once daily for 48 weeks reduces facial pigmentation area by about 15%, compared with an increase of about 6% in patients taking placebo (106563).
• Colic. Clinical research in infants with colic shows that replacing cow's milk formula with a specific casein peptide formula (Nutramigen, Mead Johnson) significantly reduces crying and colic when compared with cow's milk formula. However, this effect appears to diminish after more than four days of use (91262). Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming specific casein peptide formulas (Alimentum, Abbot Laboratories; Nutramigen, Mead Johnson) for 7 days reduces daily crying time by up to 5 hours and reduces crying intensity when compared with baseline in infants with colic (91264). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Diabetes. Consuming casein peptides with carbohydrates may be beneficial for reducing postprandial glucose and insulin levels in adults with type 2 diabetes. Casein peptides have also been evaluated for the prevention of type 1 diabetes in infants, with inconclusive results. In adults with type 2 diabetes, casein protein may improve postprandial glucose levels. Most clinical research shows that consuming casein peptides in conjunction with a carbohydrate bolus increases postprandial insulin response by 26% to 300% and reduces postprandial glucose levels by 5% to 28% when compared with consuming carbohydrates alone (91276,91295,91297,91299). These effects seem to persist with casein peptide doses as low as 12 grams daily, but not 6 grams daily (91300). Preliminary clinical research also shows that adding leucine 5 grams or 0.1 grams/kg to casein peptides increases postprandial insulin levels by 52% to 200%, reduces postprandial glucose levels by 5% to 12%, and improves 24-hour glucose levels by 11% when compared with consuming carbohydrates alone (91296,91297). However, some preliminary clinical research shows that consuming casein peptides 0.4 grams/kg with each meal for one day does not improve glycemic control (91298). These differing outcomes might be related to the forms of carbohydrates used, which include carbohydrate boluses and carbohydrate-containing meals. Additionally, the evidence for the effects of intact casein protein, as opposed to casein peptides, on postprandial insulin and glucose levels is conflicting (91276,91299). Clinical research in infants 6-8 months of age who are genetically predisposed to type 1 diabetes shows that administering a specific casein peptide-based formula (Nutramigen, Mead Johnson) in place of breastmilk decreases the development of one or more diabetes-associated auto-antibodies when compared with cow's milk formula. However, there was no difference in type 1 diabetes incidence after 10 years. This study was not powered to detect a difference in this outcome (91675).
• Food allergies. Clinical research shows that specific casein peptide formulas are a safe and well-tolerated alternative for children with documented allergy to cow's milk. Evaluated formulas include Alimentum (Abbot Laboratories), Damira 2000 (Nutrition & Sante S.L.), Frisolac Allergycare (Friesland Nutrition), and Nutramigen (Mead Johnson) (91663,91664,91665).
• Hypertension. The casein peptides isoleucine-proline-proline (IPP) and valine-proline-proline (VPP), sometimes referred to as lactotripeptides, can modestly reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Lower doses given for shorter durations seem to produce greater effects, and the effects may be more pronounced in Japanese patients than in European patients. The most comprehensive meta-analysis to-date in patients with hypertension shows that taking casein peptides reduces systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 3 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 1.5 mmHg. The average dose of casein peptides was 10.5 mg daily, including IPP 5.2 mg and VPP 5.3 mg daily, for about 8 weeks. However, there may be an inverse dose-response relationship; daily doses of casein peptides of 10 mg or less, lasting for 8 weeks or less, reduced blood pressure to a greater degree when compared with higher doses given for longer durations. Furthermore, casein peptides produced by fermentation resulted in modestly greater blood pressure reduction when compared with casein peptides produced by enzymatic hydrolysis (103765). Patient ethnicity may also play a role in the magnitude of effect. Meta-analyses in Japanese patients show a 6 mmHg reduction in SBP and a 3 mmHg reduction in DBP, while a meta-analysis in European patients shows a 1.3 mmHg reduction in SBP and a 0.6 reduction in DBP when compared with control (103762,103763,103765). A small clinical study in healthy Japanese males and postmenopausal adults with prehypertension shows that supplementation with casein peptides IPP 2 mg and VPP 1.4 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces home-monitored 7-day mean DBP, but not SBP, by 0.9 mmHg, compared with an increase of 1.2 mmHg in those receiving placebo (106565). Although findings are positive overall, the validity of the above meta-analysis, as well as older or less comprehensive analyses, is limited by the poor reporting and methodology of the included studies (103763,103765,103770,103772). Some limited research in patients with metabolic syndrome shows conflicting blood pressure lowering effects. A small clinical study shows that taking IPP/VPP (Calpis Co., Ltd.) 10.2 mg in the morning before breakfast daily for 4 weeks lowers 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure by 2 mmHg, but not diastolic blood pressure, when compared with placebo (103764). However, another study shows that taking casein peptides 5-25 mg daily with plant sterols 2 grams daily orally for 12 weeks does not reduce blood pressure when compared with placebo (103767). Notably, this study was not adequately powered to detect small changes in blood pressure.
• Neonatal jaundice. Preliminary clinical research shows that feeding newborns a specific casein peptide formula (Nutramigen, Mead Johnson) for 3 weeks reduces the risk of jaundice when compared with whey-predominant formula (91642) or human milk (91642,91651). Other preliminary clinical research in breastfed newborns shows that taking 5 mL of casein peptide formula, created by enzymatic hydrolysis, 6 times daily for 7 days decreases transcutaneous bilirubin levels when compared with breastfeeding alone (91643).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Asthma. Most clinical research shows that feeding infants a casein peptide-based formula (Nutramigen or Progestimil, Mead Johnson), with or without breastmilk for 4 months, does not reduce the risk for asthma in the first 4 months to 6 years of life in children with a family history of atopy (91655,91659,91660). However, one preliminary clinical study shows that feeding infants Nutramigen beginning at about 3.8 months of age decreases wheezing by 61% compared to cow's milk formula; the incidence of asthma was not evaluated (91656).
• Infant development. Most clinical research shows that using casein peptide-predominant formula for 6 weeks to 6 months in premature, low-birth weight, or healthy infants does not affect growth when compared with breast milk, whey protein-based formula, rice hydrolysate formula, cow's milk formula, or amino acid-based formula (86085,91644,91672,91673). Additionally, feeding infants a specific casein peptide formula (Nutramigen, Mead Johnson) for 4 months does not affect growth at 6 or 10 years when compared with whey protein-based formula, cow's milk formula, or breast milk (86085,91644). However, clinical research suggests that a casein peptide-based formula might be beneficial in infants with cow's milk allergy. One study in this population shows that casein peptide-based formula significantly increases growth from 6-12 months of age when compared with soy-based formula (91672).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Athletic performance. Preliminary clinical research in overweight male police officers shows that taking casein peptides 1.5 grams/kg daily in two divided doses for 12 weeks, in conjunction with resistance training, decreases body fat percentage by 3%, increases lean body mass by 2 kg, and improves chest, shoulder, and leg press strength by around 30% when compared with whey protein (85648).
• Diarrhea. Preliminary clinical research in children with persistent diarrhea shows that a casein peptide-based diet is less effective for reducing stool output than a yogurt-based diet (91648).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Preliminary clinical research in male cyclists shows that drinking 200 mL of a carbohydrate beverage containing 1.8% casein peptides every 5 km followed by 500 mL after cycling completion reduces exercise-induced muscle soreness and improves late-exercise time-trial performance when compared with drinking a carbohydrate beverage alone (91256).
• Insomnia. A small clinical study in Korean patients with poor sleep quality shows that taking a specific product (Lactium, Ingredia) containing bovine alpha-s1 casein peptides 300 mg one hour before bedtime for 4 weeks modestly improves sleep efficiency based on subjective reports and actigraphy measures when compared with placebo (103774).
• Physical performance. Preliminary clinical research in healthy older males shows that taking casein peptides 10 grams before and after resistance training for 8 weeks does not improve strength or body composition when compared with placebo (91255). More evidence is needed to rate casein peptides for these uses.

(Read more about CASEIN PEPTIDES)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Dietary cocoa seems to be beneficial for CVD prevention. Oral cocoa extract may reduce the risk of CVD-related death, but it is unclear if it can prevent other CVD-related outcomes like myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. Details: A large clinical trial in adults without CVD shows that taking a specific cocoa extract daily for around 3.5 years reduces the risk of CVD-related death by 27%, but does not reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, including MI or stroke, or overall mortality when compared with placebo. This specific cocoa extract contained 500 mg of flavanols, including 80 mg of epicatechins (108898). In 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that very limited scientific evidence suggests that the cocoa flavanols in high flavanol cocoa powder, for products containing at least 4% naturally conserved cocoa flavanols, may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (110017). Observational research in adults without CVD has also found that consuming a higher amount of cocoa is associated with a 10% lower risk of CVD and an up to 50% lower risk of CVD-related mortality when compared with consuming lower amounts of cocoa. Consuming more than 90 grams of cocoa per week did not add further benefit (14288,97192). Additional clinical research shows that taking cocoa flavanols 450 mg twice daily for one month improves cholesterol levels and blood pressure values, resulting in improved Framingham Risk Scores in healthy patients. These scores correspond to a 21% decrease in the 10-year risk for coronary heart disease, a 22% decrease in the risk for CVD, a 31% decrease in the risk for MI, and a 30% decrease in the risk for CVD-related mortality (92273). There is also evidence that consuming cocoa might improve flow-mediated dilatation, a measure of endothelial dysfunction. Meta-analyses of clinical research have found that increased cocoa or chocolate intake significantly improves flow-mediated dilatation. This is seen with intakes of 19-54 grams of cocoa daily, 46-100 grams of dark chocolate daily, or cocoa products containing 16.6-1080 mg of flavonoids daily (17187,42059,42137).
• Hypertension. Oral cocoa seems to be beneficial for modestly decreasing blood pressure in hypertensive patients. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for preventing hypertension. Details: Overall, clinical research shows that chocolate or cocoa containing 25-1080 mg daily of flavonoids modestly reduces blood pressure in hypertensive patients (14306,15655,15752,42092,42107,42169,97190,103247). Meta-analyses of clinical research show that consuming commercially available dark chocolate or flavanol-enriched chocolate/cocoa products daily for 2-8 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure (SBP) by around 4 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by around 2 mmHg in patients with hypertension when compared to control products with low levels of flavanols or no flavanols (42169,97190). Additionally, a meta-analysis of clinical trials in middle-aged and elderly patients with or without hypertension shows that consuming cocoa products daily for 4-18 weeks reduces SBP and DBP by around 3 mmHg and 1.5 mmHg, respectively, when compared with control products (103249). Blood pressure lowering seems to occur more readily in hypertensive or pre-hypertensive individuals when compared with normotensive individuals (14306,15655,15752,42092,42107,42169,97190,103247). Consumption of cocoa might also reduce the risk of developing hypertension in normotensive patients. Observational research has found that long-term consumption of moderate amounts of cocoa (2.2 grams to 6.1 grams daily) is associated with a 7% lower risk of hypertension when compared with consumption of less than 0.61 grams daily. However, consumption of amounts greater than 6.1 grams daily does not seem to reduce hypertension risk. Also, this benefit seems to be limited to patients consuming cocoa from plain chocolate, as consumption of cocoa from desserts was linked with a 9% greater risk of hypertension (103248).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Hypercholesterolemia. Oral cocoa does not seem to be beneficial for reducing cholesterol levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Details: Some preliminary clinical research in healthy, normocholesterolemic males shows that diets high in stearic acid from cocoa butter result in lower cholesterol levels when compared with diets high in myristic acid from dairy butter. However, a diet high in stearic acid from cocoa butter does not significantly lower cholesterol when compared to baseline in this population (15063). A meta-analysis of 10 clinical studies shows that cocoa or dark chocolate can reduce total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in normocholesterolemic patients (42125). However, some preliminary clinical research in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that drinking a high-flavanol cocoa beverage daily for 6 weeks does not reduce cholesterol when compared with a low-flavanol cocoa beverage (42013). Also, while some clinical research shows that taking cocoa powder 26 grams with sugar daily for 12 weeks can increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels when compared with sugar alone in normocholesterolemic and hypercholesterolemic patients (42026), taking cocoa or dark chocolate 13-41 grams daily does not seem to lower total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol in these patients (42026,42029,42225).
• Stretch marks (striae gravidarum). Topical cocoa butter does not seem to be beneficial for preventing stretch marks during pregnancy. Details: Clinical research shows that topical application with a cream containing cocoa butter 25% to the abdomen daily, starting during the second and third trimesters and continuing until delivery, does not prevent stretch marks when compared with a placebo cream (105261). Other clinical research shows that topical application with a cream containing cocoa butter and vitamin E as tocopheryl acetate to the abdomen, breasts, and thighs, daily, starting during the second trimester and continuing until delivery, does not reduce the prevalence or severity of stretch marks when compared to a cream not containing these ingredients (105262). More research is needed in individuals of all skin types.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for improving cognitive function in healthy older adults. Details: Some small clinical studies in healthy adults over the age of 60 with or without existing cognitive impairment show that sub-chronic intake of cocoa at doses of 45 mg, 520 mg, or 990 mg once daily for 8 weeks, or as a cocoa drink containing flavanols 609 mg daily for 30 days, modestly improves some measures of cognitive function, including task switching, visual attention, and verbal fluency (42184,92269). However, it does not improve performance on the mini mental state exam (92269). Also, one clinical study in healthy adults aged 60 years and older shows that consuming a dark chocolate bar containing 11 grams of cocoa and drinking 237 mL of an artificially sweetened drink containing 11 grams of cocoa daily for 6 weeks does not improve neuropsychological function when compared with placebo (42050). Additional preliminary clinical research in postmenopausal females aged 50-64 years shows that adding chocolate 10 grams daily, containing 99% cocoa, for 6 months does not improve most measures of cognitive function when compared with not taking cocoa (105259). Reasons for the discrepancies are unclear but may relate to the dose of cocoa, the duration of intake, or the specific cognitive testing procedures conducted.
• Aging skin. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for aging skin. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with aging skin shows taking a specific product (GliSODin Skin Nutrients Advanced Anti-Aging Formula, Isocell North America Inc.) 780 mg three times daily, containing cocoa extract, as well as superoxide dismutase, krill oil, sea buckthorn, hyaluronic acid, and other nutrients, in combination with daily use of tazarotene cream 0.1%, for 90 days improves fine wrinkling, photodamage, and skin elasticity when compared with tazarotene cream and placebo (91778). Additional preliminary clinical research in patients with photoaged skin shows that drinking a cocoa drink containing 320 mg of flavanols daily for 24 weeks improves wrinkle depth and skin elasticity, but not skin hydration, when compared with placebo (92274).
• Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral cocoa for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cocoa for this condition.
• Athletic performance. Although there has been interest in using oral cocoa for improving athletic performance, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cocoa for this use.
• Atrial fibrillation. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for preventing atrial fibrillation. Details: Most population research has found that chocolate consumption is not associated with a reduced risk of atrial fibrillation (97188,97189).
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for CFS. Details: In patients with CFS, preliminary clinical research shows that consuming 45 grams of a polyphenol-rich chocolate in three divided doses daily for 8 weeks can reduce fatigue by 35%, anxiety by 37%, and depression by 45%, and can increase overall function by 30%, when compared with pretreatment (42116).
• Cirrhosis. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for cirrhosis. Details: Clinical research shows that consuming a liquid test meal (Ensure Plus) in addition to dark chocolate (Lindt Excellence 85% Cocoa, Lindt & Sprüngli) 0.55 grams/kg can reduce the postprandial increase in hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhosis when compared with the test drink alone (42164).
• Cognitive function. Research on the use of oral cocoa for improving cognitive function in healthy adults under the age of 60 is conflicting. Details: In healthy younger individuals, consuming an acute dose of cocoa flavanols 520-994 mg as a specific powder (Cocoapro) appears to improve some, but not all, measures of cognitive function when examined in a situation of sustained mental effort (42093). Additionally, consuming an acute dose of cocoa flavanols 900 mg as a specific powder (Acticoa) seems to improve reaction time during cognitive testing when compared with placebo in healthy adults and patients with type 1 diabetes (103251). However, acute dosing with cocoa flavanols 374-747 mg as specific powders (Acticoa) or cocoa extract capsules (Naturex) does not seem to improve measures of cognitive function, visual working memory, or ability to focus during testing in young people (99984,99985,109448). Also, in middle-aged participants, taking a dark chocolate drink mix 20 grams containing 250 mg or 500 mg polyphenols as a single dose does not seem to improve measures of cognitive function (92272). Reasons for the discrepancies are unclear but may relate to the dose of cocoa, the duration of intake, the level of stress during cognitive testing, or the specific cognitive testing procedures conducted.
• Constipation. Oral cocoa husk has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children with chronic constipation shows that taking 2-4 sachets containing cocoa husk 8-16 grams and beta-fructosans 2-4 grams daily for 4 weeks can reduce hard stools by 45% and reduce transit time by 36 hours when compared with a placebo (42016).
• Diabetes. Several small clinical studies suggest that oral cocoa may cause small but clinically insignificant improvements in glycemic control in patients with diabetes. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for the prevention of diabetes. Details: While some individual studies show conflicting results (97252,99982), two similar meta-analyses of 8-9 small clinical trials in patients with diabetes show that taking cocoa 1-54 grams daily for up to 52 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose by around 7-9 mg/dL and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by around 10-15 mg/dL, but does not improve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin levels, blood pressure, total cholesterol, or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, when compared with control (109447,109449). This slight improvement in fasting blood glucose, along with a lack of effect on HbA1c, suggests that cocoa is unlikely to lead to clinically meaningful improvements in glycemic control. Population research has found that eating up to 60 grams of chocolate per week is associated with a lower risk of developing diabetes. Higher consumption was not found to affect diabetes risk (97192).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral cocoa flavanols are beneficial for preventing exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of cocoa flavanols (Chococru Extraordinary Flavanol Cocoa) 830 mg or 1245 mg within 5 minutes of a strenuous exercise protocol does not reduce exercise-induced muscle damage over 72 hours when compared with a control providing no cocoa flavanols (105260).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for heart failure prevention. Details: Population research has found that consuming up to 250 grams of chocolate weekly is associated with reduced risk of heart failure. However, consuming 300 grams weekly or more does not appear to affect the risk of heart failure (97187,97191).
• HIV/AIDS-related dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for HIV/AIDS-related dyslipidemia. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with HIV shows that consuming dark chocolate 65 grams containing cocoa 36 grams for 15 days does not affect low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or total cholesterol levels when compared with a white chocolate placebo. However, it slightly increases levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (96472).
• Influenza. Although there has been interest in using oral cocoa for influenza, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cocoa for this condition.
• Insect repellent. It is unclear if topical cocoa oil is beneficial as an insect repellent. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that topical application of cocoa oil, 1 mL on each leg and 0.5 mL on each forearm, reduces bites from black flies (Simulium damnosum) by 99% (41954).
• Isolated systolic hypertension. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for isolated systolic hypertension. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming 100 grams daily of cocoa polyphenol-rich dark chocolate might modestly reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (13166).
• Menopausal symptoms. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for menopausal symptoms. Details: In postmenopausal individuals aged 50-64 years, preliminary clinical research shows that adding chocolate 10 grams daily, containing cocoa 99%, for 6 months reduces body fat mass by approximately 0.6 kg and body fat percentage by 0.8%, and modestly improves some measures of quality of life, when compared with no treatment (105255,105258). However, there was no effect on all measures of quality of life, general menopausal symptoms, weight, body mass index, or most measures of cognitive function (105255,105258,105259).
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Although there has been interest in using oral cocoa for MS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cocoa for this condition.
• Muscle strength. Oral cocoa seed extract has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy males shows that taking a combination product containing cocoa seed extract and pomegranate rind extract 400 mg daily for 8 weeks increases testosterone levels, hand grip strength, and upper arm circumference when compared with placebo (108485).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for obesity. Details: Preliminary clinical research in overweight or obese premenopausal females shows that following a reduced-calorie diet in addition to consuming two squares of dark chocolate and drinking 8 ounces of a sugar-free cocoa beverage daily for 18 weeks does not increase weight loss when compared with the reduced-calorie diet plus a non-chocolate snack (42130,99983).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for Parkinson disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming a single dose of dark chocolate 200 grams containing approximately 80% cocoa does not improve motor function in patients with Parkinson disease when compared with a white chocolate control, although there seems to be some improvements after one hour when compared with baseline (42156).
• Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for PAD. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with PAD shows that drinking a flavanol-rich cocoa beverage 15 grams daily for 6 months increases 6-minute walking distance by up to 43 meters when compared with placebo (103250).
• Stroke. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Population research has found that the highest dietary intake of chocolate is associated with a 16% reduced risk of stroke when compared with the lowest intake (97192). More evidence is needed to rate cocoa for these uses.

(Read more about COCOA)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Hypertension. Oral CLA seems to modestly reduce blood pressure when used along with ramipril. Details: Clinical research shows that taking CLA 4.5 grams daily along with ramipril 37.5 mg daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure when compared with ramipril alone in individuals with stage one uncontrolled hypertension (45569).
• Obesity. In adults and children, oral CLA seems to decrease fat mass by a small amount, including abdominal fat mass. However, it is unclear if oral CLA is beneficial for weight loss, body mass index (BMI) reduction, or improvement of metabolic measures. Details: Taking CLA 3-6.8 grams daily seems to decrease body fat mass, increase lean body mass, and reduce waist and hip circumference in some patients (2819,3153,4947,13137,45295,45303,45685,45799,97003,105809). However, doses greater than 3.4 grams daily do not seem to offer any additional benefit when compared with lower doses (2819,2821,3153,4947,10410,11327,13137,45295,45799). Also, supplementing milk with CLA 3 grams daily seems to reduce total fat mass in overweight individuals when compared with placebo (45331). CLA also seems to reduce hunger and improve satiety and feelings of fullness, but this appetite suppression does not necessarily result in a lower energy intake or improved body weight maintenance (11327). In overweight children aged 6-10 years, taking CLA 3 grams daily for approximately 7 months seems to reduce body fat, abdominal fat, and peripheral fat percentages when compared with placebo (45713). There is inconsistent evidence regarding the effects of CLA on body weight and BMI, with most research suggesting that CLA does not reduce total body weight or BMI (2819,2821,3153,10410,13137,45007,45790,97003,97006). Also, taking CLA in combination with omega-3 fatty acids or chromium picolinate does not seem to improve BMI and body weight in overweight or obese individuals (42627,45431). Although one meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking CLA 2.4-6 grams daily for 6-12 months increases weight loss by 0.7 kg and fat loss by 1.3 kg when compared with placebo, this effect is small and may not be clinically significant (91585). Also, taking CLA 3.4 grams daily for 1 year does not seem to prevent weight or body fat regain in overweight individuals who previously lost some of their initial body weight (45083,45221). However, one study shows that taking CLA 8 grams daily for 16 weeks seems to reduce BMI in obese, postmenopausal adults with type 2 diabetes (45614). Some studies have evaluated the consumption of CLA-enriched fatty foods. In overweight males, consuming butter enriched with CLA does not seem to have beneficial metabolic effects (45192). Also, in overweight or obese individuals, consuming a goat cheese naturally enriched in CLA and omega-3 fatty acids for 12 weeks does not seem to improve BMI, fat mass, or weight, or most metabolic measures, including fasting glucose, blood pressure, or inflammatory factors, when compared to a control goat cheese. However, there was an increase in total cholesterol, possibly related to an increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and reduced levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) (105808). There is evidence that the isolated trans-10,cis-12 isomer of CLA can increase hyperproinsulinemia and insulin resistance in patients with abdominal obesity (2821,13026,13137). Hyperproinsulinemia is an independent risk factor for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Therefore, CLA might not be a good choice for obese patients; however, most commercial CLA products contain a mixture of CLA isomers. It is not known if these mixed CLA isomer products carry this risk.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Common cold. Oral CLA does not seem to be beneficial for common cold prevention or treatment. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking CLA 2 grams daily does not reduce the risk of developing a cold or reduce cough or sore throat severity in individuals with a common cold when compared with placebo (45577).
• Diabetes. Oral CLA does not seem to be beneficial for diabetes. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking CLA 6.4 grams daily for 16 weeks does not improve fasting glucose, postprandial glucose, or insulin in individuals with type 2 diabetes when compared with safflower oil (45614,45835).
• Hyperlipidemia. Oral CLA does not seem to be beneficial for hyperlipidemia. Details: Clinical research in obese individuals who are borderline hyperlipidemic shows that drinking 1 liter of milk containing CLA 4.2% daily for 8 weeks does not improve total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglycerides when compared with untreated milk (45790). Additional clinical research in obese females shows that taking CLA 3.2 grams daily for 8 weeks in conjunction with an aerobic exercise regimen does not improve plasma lipid or triglyceride levels when compared to aerobic exercise with placebo (97006).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if oral CLA is beneficial for reducing symptoms of allergic rhinitis. Details: Clinical research shows that taking CLA 2 grams daily for 12 weeks improves overall well-being in patients with birch pollen allergy when compared with placebo, but does not improve eye or total allergy symptoms (45395).
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral CLA is beneficial for reducing symptoms of asthma. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with mild asthma shows that taking CLA 4.5 grams daily for 12 weeks improves airway hypersensitivity and tolerance to strenuous exercise when compared with placebo, but without significantly reducing the need to use rescue bronchodilators or improving lung capacity (45787). In addition, a small clinical trial in children 6-18 years of age with allergic asthma shows that taking CLA 3 grams daily for 12 weeks does not reduce the use of emergency bronchodilators or improve peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume (FEV1), or vital lung capacity when compared with placebo (97005).
• Atherosclerosis. Although there is interest in using oral CLA for preventing atherosclerosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of CLA for this purpose.
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral CLA is beneficial for improving athletic performance. Details: Some preliminary clinical research in student athletes shows that taking CLA powder (CLAce Powder, The Nisshin OilliO Group, Ltd.) 900 mg daily for 14 days increases time to exhaustion during exercise by an average of 179 seconds, but does not reduce rate of perceived exertion, when compared with placebo (97002). Other small clinical trials show that taking a specific product containing CLA oil (Clarinol A-80, Stepan Specialty Products, LLC) 5.63 grams daily for 6 weeks in combination with aerobic training does not improve muscle endurance, muscle power, peak oxygen uptake, or cardiorespiratory fatigue threshold when compared with placebo in untrained to moderately trained males (91587,91588).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if dietary CLA is beneficial for preventing breast cancer. Details: Some observational research has found that a higher intake of CLA in foods, particularly cheese, is linked with a lower risk of developing breast cancer in postmenopausal individuals (5058). However, other population research has found that intake of CLA is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (45609). Furthermore, some epidemiological evidence has found that CLA intake might be weakly associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (45048).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral CLA is beneficial for improving cognitive function in older adults. Details: Preliminary clinical research in older adults shows that taking CLA 1.75 grams twice daily for 6 weeks may modestly improve verbal learning and recall in males, but not females, when compared with placebo (97008).
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if dietary CLA is beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer. Details: Epidemiological research has found that high dietary intake of CLA might reduce the risk of colorectal cancer in females by up to 39% (13775). It is not known if taking CLA supplements is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral CLA is beneficial for metabolic syndrome. Details: Evidence from a small clinical trial shows that taking CLA 3 grams daily orally for 90 days, along with a hypocaloric diet, decreases body fat mass by approximately 3% when compared to baseline in females with metabolic syndrome. However, this reduction does not appear to be significant when compared with placebo treatment, and CLA does not lower blood lipid levels or blood pressure (91586).
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral CLA is beneficial for increasing muscle strength. Details: Some preliminary clinical research shows that adding CLA 6 grams to supplementation with creatine 9 grams and whey protein 36 grams daily for 12 weeks modestly enhances strength improvement and lean tissue mass when compared with placebo in adults participating in strength training (45596). However, other clinical research shows that taking CLA 5 grams daily for 7 weeks does not improve most measures of strength in adults participating in resistance training when compared with placebo, although bench press strength was modestly improved in males, and lean tissue mass and fat mass were also improved (45222). Other clinical research shows that taking CLA 6 grams daily for 4 weeks does not improve body composition or strength in resistance-trained athletes (45041). The reasons for these discrepancies are unclear, but may be related to the duration of treatment.
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral CLA is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking CLA (Nutrifit, Nutricentury) 1 gram three times daily in conjunction with a weight loss diet for 8 weeks reduces fat mass, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and increases muscle mass when compared with a weight loss diet alone in obese adults with NAFLD. CLA was also associated with a reduction in glycated hemoglobin, but with no corresponding reduction in fasting plasma glucose (97004).
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral CLA is beneficial for improving physical performance in older adults. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults 65-85 years of age shows that taking CLA 1.75 grams twice daily for 6 weeks does not improve handgrip strength or hand discomfort when compared with placebo (97008).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if oral CLA is beneficial for RA. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking CLA 2.5 grams daily with or without vitamin E 400 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces pain and morning stiffness and reduces erythrocyte sedimentation rate in patients with RA when compared to baseline (45730). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group. More evidence is needed to rate conjugated linoleic acid for these uses.

(Read more about CONJUGATED LINOLEIC ACID (CLA))

EFFECTIVE

• Lactose intolerance. Taking lactase orally is effective for reducing GI symptoms in lactose-intolerant people when used before the consumption of lactose or when added to milk prior to consumption (2371,2372,2373,106669).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Colic. Preliminary clinical research in infants with colic shows that supplementing human milk or formula with lactase (Crosscare Ltd) for 10 days reduces breath hydrogen levels, but not time spent crying, when compared with placebo. However, approximately 30% of infants in this study were considered to be noncompliant. When only infants considered to be compliant were included in the analysis, time spent crying during the 10-day treatment period was reduced by about 6 hours in the lactase group when compared with placebo (96347). In other preliminary clinical research, giving 5 drops of a specific lactase formulation (Colibid, RG Pharmaceutica) to infants aged 0-6 months with colic before each feed for 2 weeks significantly reduces crying time in 87% of the infants, compared with 60% of those receiving placebo (104107). However, measures of crying time were based on subjective parent recall only.
• Prematurity. Clinical research shows that giving fortified human milk or preterm formula treated with lactase drops (Lactaid, McNeil Consumer Products Company) to preterm infants does not improve weight gain, feeding tolerance, weekly length gain, or gain in head circumference by 36 weeks' gestational age or discharge from the hospital (whichever comes first) when compared with giving untreated milk or formula (96346). More evidence is needed to rate lactase for these uses.

(Read more about LACTASE)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cachexia. Intravenous MCTs can provide calories in critically ill patients and patients with refractory cachexia, but do not seem to offer any advantages over long chain triglycerides. Details: Several small clinical studies in critically ill patients and patients with refractory cachexia secondary to cancer show that receiving parenteral nutrition with a 1:1 mixture of MCTs and long chain triglycerides is similarly effective to long chain triglycerides alone for improving metabolic parameters or nutritional status (2275,2276,93739).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• HIV/AIDS-related wasting. Oral MCTs do not seem to promote weight gain or prevent weight loss in patients with HIV infection. Details: A large clinical study in patients with HIV infection shows that taking a peptide-based supplement containing MCTs (Peptamen Oral Complete Elemental Diet, Nestlé Clinical Nutrition) with multivitamins and minerals is no more effective than taking multivitamins and minerals alone for promoting weight gain or preventing weight loss (11730).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral MCTs are beneficial in patients with age-related cognitive decline. Details: A small, single-blind clinical study in older adults residing in a nursing home shows that taking MCTs 6 grams (a 3:1 mixture of caprylic acid:capric acid), with or without L-leucine 1.2 grams and vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 20 mcg, daily for up to 3 months increases mini-mental state exam (MMSE) scores by an average of 3.5 points, compared with a 0.7-point decline in those receiving a long chain triglyceride control. MMSE scores returned to baseline 1.5 months after discontinuation of MCT supplementation (105710).
• Alzheimer disease. Small clinical studies suggest that oral MCTs do not improve cognition in patients with Alzheimer disease or mild cognitive impairment. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in patients with Alzheimer disease or mild cognitive impairment shows that taking MCTs (as combinations of caprylic acid and capric acid) in doses of 20-56 grams or 22.5-165 mL daily for up to 6 months does not improve cognition when compared with placebo or baseline (103012).
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral MCTs are beneficial for endurance athletic performance. Details: A very small clinical study in 10 male recreational endurance runners shows that taking a ketone supplement containing MCTs and a salt form of beta-hydroxybutyrate 60 minutes prior to a run does not improve 5-kilometer run time when compared with placebo (107738). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Celiac disease. Although there has been interest in using oral MCTs for celiac disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of MCTs for this purpose.
• Chylothorax. It is unclear if oral MCTs improve time to resolution of spontaneous congenital chylothorax in neonates. Details: A small retrospective study in neonates with spontaneous congenital chylothorax shows that administering MCTs does not improve the time to resolution of chylothorax when compared with total parenteral nutrition (11729).
• Chyluria. Although there has been interest in using oral MCTs for chyluria, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of MCTs for this purpose.
• Cystic fibrosis. Although there has been interest in using oral MCTs for cystic fibrosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of MCTs for this purpose.
• Diabetes. Although there has been interest in using oral MCTs for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of MCTs for this purpose.
• Epilepsy. It is unclear if oral MCTs are beneficial in adults and adolescents aged 12 years or older with drug-resistant epilepsy. Details: A small clinical study in adults and adolescents aged 12 years or older with drug-resistant epilepsy shows that adjunctive treatment with MCTs (Stepan Lipid Nutrition) as part of a non-ketogenic diet, 47-65 mL daily (about 35% of energy intake), or a maximally tolerated dose not exceeding 100 mL, for 12 weeks reduces median seizure frequency by 46% when compared with baseline (101967). The validity of this study is limited by its small sample size and the lack of a comparator group.
• Gallbladder disease. Although there has been interest in using oral MCTs for gallbladder disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of MCTs for this purpose.
• Hypertriglyceridemia. Oral MCTs might improve triglyceride levels and body weight in some patients with overweight and hypertriglyceridemia, but its effect in other populations is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with overweight and hypertriglyceridemia shows that taking 25-30 grams of an oil containing MCTs 13% daily for 8 weeks decreases triglyceride levels by 78 mg/dL when compared with consuming oil containing only long chain fats. Body weight, body fat, and waist circumference also decreased (93740). However, this benefit may be restricted to this specific population only. Some research in patients with obesity or patients with a normal body weight shows that taking 25-30 grams of an oil containing MCTs daily for 8 weeks does not lower triglyceride levels (93741).
• Obesity. Small clinical studies suggest that oral MCTs modestly improves weight loss; however, any effects may not be clinically relevant. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking MCTs decreases body weight by 0.5 kg, waist circumference by 1.5 cm, and hip circumference by 0.8 cm when compared with a control group not taking MCTs. Doses used in available research have ranged from 1-54 grams daily, or 1% to 24% of energy for 4-16 weeks (93735). Most research shows that at least 4 weeks is needed before effects are seen. The greatest benefit seems to occur in patients of Asian descent, males, and patients with higher body mass indices at baseline (93730,93731,93735,93736). While MCTs may improve weight loss in some patients, the effects are generally modest and may not be clinically relevant.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if oral or topical MCTs are beneficial in preterm infants. Details: A meta-analysis of small studies involving 136 otherwise healthy preterm infants receiving full enteral diets with formula as the predominant source of nutrition shows that administration of formulas containing at least 30% of fat by weight as MCTs (ranging in concentration from 6% to 80%) for at least 7 days does not affect short-term growth, including weight, length, and head circumference, when compared with formulas containing less than 30% of fat by weight as MCTs. Due to small study sizes, it is unclear whether either type of formula was better tolerated. The validity of this analysis is limited by the presence of unclear risk of potential bias in the included studies (105711). MCT oil has also been evaluated for the prevention of gastrointestinal Candida infections. A very small clinical study in preterm infants shows that adding MCT oil (Nestlé Health Science) 0.5 mL per ounce of formula or breast milk for 1 week reduces Candida colonization when compared with no MCT oil (101968). Topical use of MCT oil has also been evaluated for growth in preterm infants. A small clinical study in preterm infants weighing 1500-2000 grams shows that massage with MCT oil, consisting of tactile and kinesthetic stimulation, three times daily for 7 days increases weight gain when compared with no massage (107739). The validity of this finding is limited by unclear reporting. Also, it is unclear if this effect is due to MCT oil, massage, or the combination.
• Primary intestinal lymphangiectasia. It is unclear if oral MCTs are beneficial for the management of primary intestinal lymphangiectasia. Details: A review of 55 case reports suggests that taking MCTs as part of a low-fat, high-protein diet resolves symptoms in 63% of patients with primary intestinal lymphangiectasia, compared with 36% of patients receiving no treatment or other treatments such as diuretic therapy, albumin transfusions, resection of isolated segments of affected bowels, etc. Mortality is also reduced by 79% in patients treated with diet restrictions and MCTs when compared with those receiving no treatment or other treatments (93733).
• Sarcopenia. It is unclear if oral MCTs are beneficial in frail older adults. Details: A small clinical study in older adults residing in a nursing home shows that taking MCTs 6 grams, leucine 1.2 grams, and vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 20 mcg daily for 3 months increases body weight by 1.1 kg, right-hand grip strength by 13%, and peak expiratory flow by 28% when compared with baseline. These improvements are also significant when compared with patients receiving no supplementation (93729). In a second study in this same population conducted by the same research group, taking MCTs 6 grams, with or without leucine 1.2 grams and vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 20 mcg, daily for 3 months does not increase body weight or hand grip strength. There were small to moderate improvements in opening and closing the legs, repetitive swallowing, and measures of functional independence (101970). The validity of these findings is limited by the single-blind nature of the studies and the large number of endpoints. It is also unclear if any benefits are due to MCTs, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Short bowel syndrome. Although there has been interest in using oral MCTs for short bowel syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of MCTs for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate MCTs for these uses.

(Read more about MEDIUM CHAIN TRIGLYCERIDES (MCTs))

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Constipation. It is unclear if oral polydextrose is beneficial in adults or children with constipation. Details: One small, low-quality, study in Japanese patients with dialysis-related constipation despite the use of laxatives shows that taking polydextrose 10 grams daily for 4 weeks increases weekly stool frequency from 3 stools to 8.5 stools, compared with an increase from 3.5 stools to 5 stools in the placebo group. However, taking polydextrose did not improve stool consistency, abdominal distention, or diarrhea when compared with placebo (98658). Other clinical research in adults with functional constipation shows that taking 4-12 grams of polydextrose orally daily for 2 weeks improves weekly stool frequency when compared with placebo. Preliminary subgroup analyses suggest that taking 12 grams of polydextrose may be more effective than lower doses. However, taking polydextrose did not improve colonic transit times or symptom scores when compared with placebo (106481). In contrast, clinical research in adults with chronic constipation shows that taking polydextrose (LitesseUltra, Danisco) 8 or 12 grams orally daily for 4 weeks does not improve stool consistency or frequency when compared with placebo (98659). Reasons for the conflicting results may relate to heterogeneity among the trial participants, including baseline constipation severity, and the studied dose and duration of polydextrose. In children aged 4-8 years with functional constipation, preliminary clinical research shows that taking a mixture of polydextrose 4.17 grams and fructo-oligosaccharides 0.45 grams orally daily for 45 days improves the weekly frequency of bowel movements, clinical manifestations of constipation, and quality of stool type when compared with baseline (106482). It is unclear if these effects are due to polydextrose, fructo-oligosaccharides, or the combination. Also, the validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral polydextrose is beneficial in patients with diabetes. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that drinking 200 mL of a beverage containing polydextrose (Litesse, Danisco Sweeteners) 40 grams/L twice daily for 12 weeks does not affect fasting plasma glucose or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) when compared with placebo in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose, or diet-treated type 2 diabetes (34118).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (Prediabetes). It is unclear if oral polydextrose is beneficial in patients with prediabetes. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that drinking 200 mL of a beverage containing polydextrose (Litesse, Danisco Sweeteners) 40 grams/L twice daily for 12 weeks does not affect fasting plasma glucose or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) when compared with placebo in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose, or diet-treated type 2 diabetes (34118).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Oral polydextrose has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with constipation-predominant IBS shows that consuming polydextrose 5.85 grams in a 350-mL sterilized probiotic beverage containing Lactobacillus helveticus once daily for 1 week does not improve constipation-related symptoms or intestinal transit time when compared with consuming the sterilized probiotic beverage alone (106480). Additionally, it is unclear how these findings would compare with the use of standard care. More evidence is needed to rate polydextrose for these uses.

(Read more about POLYDEXTROSE)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Coronary heart disease (CHD). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allows a qualified health claim stating that using high-oleic acid sunflower oil as a replacement for other dietary fats and oils higher in saturated fat may reduce the risk of CHD. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical studies shows that replacing 7.5% of energy from partially hydrogenated vegetable oils with high-oleic acid sunflower oil can reduce CHD risk by about 9% to 19%. Furthermore, analysis of results from observational studies found that replacing partially hydrogenated oil with high-oleic acid sunflower oil is associated with a 16% to 35% reduction in the risk of CHD events (95745). The FDA allows for a qualified health claim that replacing dietary fats and oils higher in saturated fat with high-oleic acid sunflower oil may reduce the risk of CHD. To achieve this benefit, the use of high-oleic acid sunflower oil should not increase total daily energy intake. The suggested daily dietary intake is about 20 grams (1.5 tbsp) of high-oleic sunflower oil in place of other fats and oils (98563). Sunflower oil that contains high amounts of linoleic acid rather than oleic acid does not appear to improve cholesterol levels or reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with CHD (96205).
• Hypercholesterolemia. Consuming sunflower oil in the diet may reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in some patients. Details: There is evidence that using sunflower oil in the diet as 45-50 grams daily for up to 12 weeks is more effective than olive oil for decreasing LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B levels in healthy individuals (9780). Also, clinical research in patients with mild hyperlipidemia or moderate hypercholesterolemia shows that consuming specific brands of mid-oleic acid (NuSun) or high-oleic acid (Sunola, Meadow Lea Foods) sunflower oils as 15% to 20% of dietary calories for up to 5 weeks is more effective than olive oil or saturated fat for decreasing total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B levels (76697,76698). Also, consuming a high-oleic sunflower oil-rich diet for 3 weeks decreases total cholesterol levels to a greater extent than diets enriched with palm oil or medium-chain triglycerides in patients with mild hypercholesterolemia (67569). Other preliminary clinical research in patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia shows that consuming a diet rich in sunflower oil for 3 weeks decreases total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels when compared with baseline. However, levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol appear to be lowered as well (76714). Despite these beneficial effects, sunflower oil might be less effective than some other dietary oils. Taking sunflower oil for 3 months appears to be less effective than rice bran oil for lowering cholesterol in patients with hypercholesterolemia (76699). Also, while consuming sunflower oil 45 grams daily, as part of the diet and as a supplement, for 12 weeks reduces levels of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol when compared with baseline, it appears to be less effective at reducing total cholesterol levels than flaxseed oil in certain patients at risk for atherosclerosis (76696). In addition, taking sunflower oil 15.1 grams daily for 4 months does not appear to reduce levels of total or LDL cholesterol in patients with peripheral vascular disease (76691).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Hypertension. Oral sunflower oil does not seem to lower blood pressure. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with hypertension shows that taking sunflower oil 30-40 grams daily for one year is less effective than extra-virgin olive oil for reducing blood pressure (5091). Also, clinical research in elderly adults with hypertension shows that taking 60 grams of sunflower oil daily for 4 weeks is less effective than virgin olive oil for reducing systolic blood pressure (76692).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral sunflower oil is beneficial for atherosclerosis; some clinical research suggests that it may provide less benefit than other dietary oils. Details: Some preliminary clinical research in obese and overweight individuals shows that taking sunflower oil 30 mL (about 27 grams) daily for 90 days decreases carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) by 3.5% when compared to baseline, but not when compared with olive oil or flaxseed oil. Sunflower oil also improves flow-mediated vasodilation by 73% when compared with baseline, compared with no improvement in those taking flaxseed oil or olive oil (99303). Other preliminary clinical research in individuals waiting for carotid endarterectomy shows that taking sunflower oil 6 grams daily for up to 189 days is less effective than the same dose of fish oil, and equivalent to control oil, for improving the status of atherosclerotic plaques (76688).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Although there is interest in using topical sunflower oil for atopic dermatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sunflower oil for this condition.
• Child growth. It is unclear if topical sunflower oil is beneficial for early child growth. Details: A large preliminary clinical trial in newborn infants in India shows that exclusive topical application of 10 mL of high-linoleic acid sunflower oil, an average of 2.7 times daily for about one month, increases weight gain by 1.3 gram/kg daily when compared to a control group exclusively given traditional vigorous massage with mustard oil an average of 2.4 times daily. The increase in weight gain was highest for infants weighing less than 1500-2000 grams at birth (108141). However, it is unclear if any beneficial effects are due to the sunflower oil, the massage, their combination, or the lack of mustard oil.
• Dry mouth. It is unclear if rinsing the mouth with sunflower oil is beneficial for dry mouth. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with moderate dry mouth associated with medication use shows that using a sunflower oil mouth rinse and gargling for 5-8 minutes before spitting it out twice daily for 7 days improves dry mouth scores by 23% when compared with baseline. Sunflower oil also improves the ability to swallow and sleep with dry mouth, but not other dry mouth symptoms or saliva flow rate, when compared with control (105523). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Dry skin. It is unclear if topical sunflower oil is beneficial for dry skin in infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in full-term, newborn infants shows that topical application of 4 drops of sunflower oil to each of three parts of the body twice daily for 4 weeks improves skin hydration, but not skin barrier function or the presence of redness or rash, when compared with not using topical oil. Furthermore, use of sunflower oil may impede the normal development of skin barrier function that occurs during the first four weeks of life (96144).
• Fetal and premature infant mortality. It is unclear if topical sunflower oil is beneficial for preventing early mortality in premature infants. Details: A large clinical trial in newborn infants in India shows that exclusive topical application of 10 mL of high-linoleic acid sunflower oil, an average of 2.7 times daily for about one month, reduces infant mortality by 58% when compared to a control group exclusively given traditional vigorous massage with mustard oil an average of 2.4 times daily. A subgroup analysis of premature infants also shows a 52% reduction in mortality with the use of high-linoleic acid sunflower oil when compared with control (108143). However, it is unclear if any beneficial effects are due to the sunflower oil, the massage, their combination, or the lack of mustard oil.
• Prematurity. Small clinical studies suggest that topical sunflower oil via massage or as a standard topical application may improve infant growth and skin scores. Details: Preliminary clinical research in preterm infants with low birth weight shows that massaging for 5-10 minutes using sunflower oil 10 mL/kg three times daily for 2 weeks increases weight gain by approximately 35% over 2 months when compared with massage using no oil. Sunflower oil massage does not appear to increase length or head circumference (96145). A small clinical study in premature infants in the intensive care unit (ICU) shows that a similar massage with sunflower oil three times daily for 5 days shortens ICU stay by about 5 days when compared with no massage. Furthermore, over the ICU stay, infants in the sunflower oil massage group gained an average of 15 grams, whereas infants in the control group experienced weight loss (98479). Additionally, preliminary clinical research in preterm infants admitted to the ICU shows that applying sunflower oil 4 mL/kg topically four times daily for 5 days improves neonatal skin scores, including hydration, dryness, redness, and breakdown, when compared with no intervention. These improvements were similar to those seen with almond oil 4 mL/kg applied topically four times daily (105524).
• Psoriasis. Although there is interest in using topical sunflower oil for psoriasis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sunflower oil for this condition.
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although there is interest in using oral sunflower oil for RA, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sunflower oil for this condition.
• Tinea pedis. It is unclear if topical sunflower oil is beneficial for tinea pedis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that topical application of a specific brand of ozonized sunflower oil (Oleozon) twice daily for 6 weeks is as effective as ketoconazole for curing athlete's foot (76687). More evidence is needed to rate sunflower oil for these uses.

(Read more about SUNFLOWER OIL)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Regular consumption of whey protein in conjunction with exercise may improve muscle strength and performance. However, inconsistent consumption of whey protein, as well as intake of whey protein without concomitant exercise, may not be beneficial. Details: Most clinical research shows that taking whey protein 1.2-1.5 grams/kg or 30-33 grams daily in combination with strength training for 6-21 weeks can increase lean body mass, strength, and muscle hypertrophy in healthy young adults (16728,16729,16748,46552,85765,85910,91806,96025,102173). Higher doses of whey protein, such as 46-77 grams daily, have also been shown to increase strength when combined with athletic training (98886,98888). Some clinical research shows that whey protein hydrolysate (Lacprodan HYDRO.365, Arla Food Ingridiens Group P/S) twice daily for 1 week may slightly improve running speed (91793). However, less frequent intake or lower doses of whey protein do not seem to be beneficial for muscle strength. Some clinical research in middle-aged males shows that taking whey protein 35 grams three times weekly with resistance training for 14 weeks does not improve strength or muscle mass when compared with placebo (46736,85893). A small clinical study in trained males shows that taking whey protein 25 grams daily has no effect on body mass or strength after 2 weeks of detraining and 4 weeks of retraining when compared with maltodextrin (96021). Also, consuming whey protein without concomitant exercise does not seem to improve body composition or strength. Some clinical research shows that whey protein does not improve muscle mass or strength in obese postmenopausal patients who are losing weight through diet without exercise (98889). Some research has compared whey protein to other types of protein. A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research, as well as individual clinical studies, show that whey protein is similarly beneficial to soy, beef, chicken, and dairy (casein with whey) protein for improving muscle strength (85941,98871,98888,105591). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the small size and high heterogeneity of the studies.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Oral whey protein does not seem to improve COPD symptoms. Details: Clinical research in adults with COPD shows that taking a specific whey protein supplement (ImuPower) 12 grams twice daily for 6 weeks can improve shortness of breath, but not lung function, exercise tolerance, or quality of life, when compared with placebo (86302). Other clinical research shows that taking a pressurized whey protein supplement 20 grams daily for 16 weeks, in combination with strength training for weeks 8-16, does not improve exercise tolerance, lung function, or muscle function when compared with placebo (86025).
• Osteoporosis. Oral whey protein does not seem to improve bone mineral density in older adults. Details: Clinical research shows that taking whey protein 30-45 grams daily for up to 2 years does not improve bone density when compared with a low-protein placebo in postmenopausal patients and males over 70 years of age (86074,91796). Taking whey protein 20-60 grams daily for 36 weeks also does not improve bone density when compared with an isoenergetic placebo in overweight or obese adults undergoing an exercise program (96027). The effect of whey protein in patients with osteoporosis has not been evaluated.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral whey protein is beneficial for age-related cognitive impairment. Details: Preliminary clinical research in older adults with subjective cognitive decline shows that taking whey peptide 1 gram for 12 weeks does not improve memory, executive functioning, or attention when compared with placebo. However, in a subgroup of patients with high levels of fatigue, whey peptide modestly improved memory (98885).
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral whey protein is beneficial in children with asthma. Details: A very small clinical study in children with asthma shows that taking a specific type of whey protein (HMS 90, Immunotec Inc.) 20 grams daily for 30 days does not improve lung function when compared to baseline (85833). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if consuming infant formula containing whey protein reduces the risk of developing eczema. Details: A high-quality meta-analysis of small clinical studies shows that use of infant formula containing hydrolyzed whey protein for 4-6 months is no better than standard milk formula for reducing the risk of eczema (105585). This is in contrast to older meta-analyses that found benefit after consumption of fully or partially hydrolyzed whey protein (85987,86007,86048). However, these older publications had notable conflicts of interest and did not include small negative studies (105585). In 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed a qualified health claim in healthy infants with a family history of allergy who are not solely breastfed. It stated that feeding a formula of 100% partially hydrolyzed whey protein instead of formula containing intact cow's milk proteins from birth up to 4 months of age may reduce the risk of atopic dermatitis throughout 1-3 years of age. However, the FDA has concluded that there is very little scientific evidence to support this claim (102311).
• Atopic disease. It is unclear if consuming infant formula containing whey protein reduces the risk of developing atopic disease. Details: A high-quality meta-analysis of small clinical studies shows that use of infant formula containing hydrolyzed whey protein for 4-6 months is no different than standard milk formula for reducing the risk of atopic disease. However, there was a non-significant trend to reduced risk in the hydrolyzed whey protein group (105585). This finding conflicts with older meta-analyses which found benefit with hydrolyzed whey protein formula (85987,86007). However, these older publications had notable conflicts of interest and did not include small negative studies (105585).
• Cystic fibrosis. It is unclear if oral whey protein is beneficial for children or adults with cystic fibrosis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with cystic fibrosis shows that taking pressurized whey protein, 20 grams in children and 40 grams in adults, daily for 28 days, improves lung function in children, but not adults, when compared with baseline (85995). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral whey protein is beneficial for improving glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes. Details: A small clinical study in patients with well-controlled diabetes shows that consuming a 220 kcal drink containing whey protein concentrate 50 grams (Beit Haemek Advanced Technologies, Beit Haemek) before a meal lowers blood glucose levels by 28% and increases insulin levels in the first 3 hours after a meal when compared with drinking water (91795). However, whey protein does not seem to have long-term benefit on glycemic control when added to an exercise regimen. Another small clinical study in middle-aged males with type 2 diabetes shows that adding 20 grams of whey protein daily for 10 weeks to high-intensity mixed-mode interval training (MMIT) does not further improve glycemic control or body composition when compared to MMIT with placebo (98883).
• Exercise-induced asthma. It is unclear if oral whey protein is beneficial for exercise-induced asthma. Details: A small clinical study in patients with exercise-induced asthma shows that taking whey protein 30 grams daily for 10 days improves lung function when compared to baseline (85791). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral whey protein is beneficial for attenuating exercise-induced muscle damage; evidence is conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of small heterogeneous clinical studies in trained and untrained adults shows that supplementation with a median dose of whey protein 25 grams (range 20-120 grams) given after and/or before exercise modestly improves muscle recovery measured over 3 days when compared with control (98881). Individual studies included in the analysis used whey protein 1.5 grams/kg daily for up to 2 weeks (86044), and whey protein isolate or whey protein hydrolysate (NatraPro or NatraBoost XR, MG Nutritionals) 25 grams three times in 24 hours (85915). Other small studies have not found benefit, but it is unclear if they were adequately powered. One small clinical study in healthy untrained males shows that taking whey protein 36.6 grams daily, starting 7 days before and continuing until 4 days after arm exercise, does not prevent muscle soreness over 5 days or attenuate reductions in strength (96024). Another small study in untrained healthy males shows that taking whey protein isolate (biPro, Eden Prairie) 0.3 grams/kg three times daily for 5 days does not reduce self-reported delayed onset muscle soreness, but may reduce creatine kinase, a biomarker of muscle damage, when compared with water (104758). Whey protein may not be beneficial for recovery from exercise in trained athletes. Small clinical studies show that consuming a whey protein beverage before or after exercise does not improve muscle recovery for trained adult and adolescent athletes when compared with a carbohydrate or non-caloric control (86303,91799,105592).
• Hepatitis. It is unclear if oral whey protein is beneficial for hepatitis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chronic hepatitis B shows that taking a specific type of whey protein (Immunocal) 12 grams twice daily for 12 weeks can reduce liver transaminase levels and can increase glutathione (GSH) levels when compared with baseline. However, whey protein supplementation does not seem to improve liver function in patients with chronic hepatitis C (85687). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• HIV/AIDS. It is unclear if oral whey protein is beneficial for improving immune function in children with HIV/AIDS. Details: One small clinical study in children with rapidly progressive HIV infection shows that taking whey protein at levels corresponding to 20% to 50% of total required protein for 4 months does not affect CD4 or CD8 cell count or the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ when compared with baseline. However, the occurrence of acute co-infections might be reduced with whey protein supplementation when compared with control (85781).
• HIV/AIDS-related wasting. Although oral whey is an adequate source of protein, it is unclear if it is better than other protein sources for reducing HIV/AIDs-related wasting. Details: A small open-label clinical study in malnourished patients with HIV shows that taking whey protein (dose unspecified) daily for 14 weeks increases muscle and fat mass when compared with baseline (85693). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Another small study in patients with HIV, stable weight, and a history of unintentional weight loss shows that taking whey protein 40 grams daily for 12 weeks does not affect weight or muscle mass when compared with taking an isocaloric control (85921). These study findings are limited because they cannot be generalized to patients with active weight loss or wasting. Another limitation is the higher dropout rate in the whey protein group due to gastrointestinal adverse events.
• Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear if oral whey protein is beneficial for lowering cholesterol levels. Details: A very small clinical study in overweight males with hyperlipidemia shows that taking whey protein 26.6 grams daily while participating in a resistance training program for 12 weeks reduces total cholesterol levels when compared with baseline but not when compared with placebo (85941). A meta-analysis of small heterogeneous clinical studies in healthy adults, as well as those with obesity and/or mild hypertension, shows that consuming whey protein alone or with other interventions seems to reduce lipid levels when compared with control (105586). However, most included studies were in patients without hyperlipidemia; it is unclear if whey protein is beneficial in patients with hyperlipidemia. Furthermore, these findings are limited by the variability in whey protein dosing, study duration, and patient population.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral whey protein reduces blood pressure. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that drinking a beverage containing whey protein 2.6 grams daily for 12 weeks does not lower blood pressure in patients with mild hypertension when compared with placebo (85835). Also, taking whey protein 28 grams twice daily in water for 8 weeks reduces 24-hour systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 2.9 mm Hg and 2 mmHg, respectively, when compared with maltodextrin or casein in adults with mild hypertension and prehypertension. There were also improvements in endothelial function (96019).
• Mitochondrial myopathies. It is unclear if oral whey protein improves symptoms in patients with mitochondrial myopathies. Details: A small clinical study in individuals with mitochondrial diseases shows that taking a whey protein supplement 10 grams daily for one month does not improve muscle strength or quality of life when compared with placebo (85984).
• Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). It is unclear if oral whey protein improves NASH. Details: A small clinical study in patients with untreated NASH shows that taking whey protein 20 grams daily for 12 weeks can reduce liver function tests, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and reduce hepatic macrovesicular steatosis when compared with baseline (85961). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral whey protein is beneficial for weight loss when used without dietary modifications. Adding whey protein to a calorie-restricted diet or an exercise regimen does not seem to improve weight loss. Details: Most research in overweight and obese individuals shows that taking whey protein along with a low-calorie diet and/or in addition to an exercise program does not further increase weight loss when compared with the low-calorie diet or exercise alone (85897,86069,86130,91794,91798,91802,96027,102172). However, a small clinical study in patients who have regained weight after bariatric surgery shows that following a low-calorie diet and taking whey protein 0.5 grams/kg daily for 16 weeks reduces body weight by about 2 kg and fat mass by about 3 kg when compared with following a low-calorie diet alone (96022). When whey protein is taken without diet modifications, studies have yielded conflicting results. One small clinical study in overweight and obese adults shows that taking whey protein isolate 27 grams twice daily for 12 weeks does not reduce body weight when compared with a glucose control (86011). However, another small clinical study in overweight and obese adults shows that taking whey protein concentrate 52 grams daily for 23 weeks reduces weight by 1.8 kg and fat by 2.4 kg when compared with a carbohydrate control, but is no better than taking soy protein isolate 52 grams (86077). In contrast, a small clinical study in overweight males shows that taking whey protein concentrate 65 grams before lunch daily for 12 weeks decreases calorie intake and reduces weight by about 1 kg when compared with taking soy protein isolate 60 grams (91801). In contrast to adults, supplementation with whey protein might increase weight in adolescents. A clinical study in overweight adolescents shows that consuming 1 liter of a milk-based whey protein drink daily for 12 weeks increases weight and body mass index when compared with a water control (86144).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral whey protein improves symptoms of Parkinson disease. Details: Clinical research in a small group of patients shows that taking a specific type of whey protein isolate (HMS 90/Immunocal) 10 grams twice daily for 6 months does not improve symptoms of Parkinson disease when compared with placebo (96026). However, this study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral whey protein improves symptoms and metabolic effects of PCOS. Details: One small clinical study in patients with PCOS shows that taking 240 kcal as a nutritional supplement containing pure whey protein 96% daily, in addition to a calorie-restricted diet for 2 months, reduces body weight, fat mass, and cholesterol and apolipoprotein B levels when compared with a simple sugar control supplement. However, the whey protein supplement does not improve glucose or insulin levels, and seems to decrease high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels (85912). The validity of this study is limited by its small size and a significant dropout rate.
• Polymyalgia rheumatica. It is unclear if oral whey protein improves muscle function in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica. Details: A small clinical study in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica shows that taking a whey protein-enriched dairy product twice daily for 8 weeks does not improve lower limb muscle function, walking speed, chair stand test performance, peak jump power, or peak jump force when compared with a regular dairy product (Play, Valio Ltd.) (86075).
• Psoriasis. It is unclear if oral whey protein improves psoriasis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with stable psoriasis shows that taking a specific whey protein extract product (Dermylex, Advitech, Inc.) 5 grams daily for 8 weeks modestly decreases symptom severity when compared with placebo (85885).
• Sarcopenia. Research on the use of oral whey protein in older adults with sarcopenia is conflicting. Details: Small clinical studies in trained older females show that consuming whey protein 35 grams three times weekly for 12 weeks, either before or after resistance training, modestly increases skeletal muscle mass, strength, and functional capacity when compared with resistance training and insufficient protein intake (98887,98890). Research on the use of whey supplementation without exercise is conflicting. A small clinical study in older adults with low muscle mass living in China shows that taking whey, or a whey-soy protein blend, 16 grams daily for 6 months slightly attenuates muscle loss when compared with no intervention (105603). However, a clinical study in healthy, active older adults living in Denmark shows that taking whey protein hydrolysate 20 grams twice daily does not increase muscle size or strength when compared with a carbohydrate control (105593). This finding may not be generalizable to frail adults or those with existing sarcopenia. Whey protein with or without exercise has shown benefit when used in combination with other nutrients. Specifically, whey protein 60 grams has been used with creatine 5 grams, calcium 800 mg, vitamin D 1000 IU, and omega-3 fatty acids 3 grams (Infinit Nutrition) for 6 weeks (96016). A beverage with leucine-enriched whey protein 20 grams has been used in combination with vitamin D 800 IU (Nutricia Advanced Medical Nutrition) daily for 6 weeks (96017). Another beverage containing whey protein 20 grams and vitamin D 800 IU has been used daily for 6 months (98882).
• Sepsis. It is unclear if oral whey protein is beneficial in children with sepsis. Details: A very small clinical study in long-term intensive care pediatric patients shows that taking a specific whey protein supplement (Beneprotein) 0.3 grams/kg daily for up to 28 days has a similar effect on the time to onset and the rate of hospital-acquired infection or sepsis when compared with taking a combination of zinc, selenium, glutamine, and metoclopramide. It is not clear how these results compare to patients receiving no supplementation (86095). More evidence is needed to rate whey protein for these uses.

(Read more about WHEY PROTEIN)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Casein peptides have been safely used in clinical trials lasting up to 5 months (85648,103763,103764,103765,103770,103772).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Casein peptide formulas have been safely used in healthy, premature, and very low birth weight infants (91262,91264,91643,91673,91675).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about CASEIN PEPTIDES)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately (13161,14306,14307,14308,15655,15752,17187,92271,92274,103247)(103250,108898). However, cocoa naturally contains caffeine, and caffeine may be unsafe when used orally in doses of more than 400 mg daily (11733,98806). While most cocoa products contain only small amounts of caffeine (about 2-35 mg per serving) (2708,3900), one cup of unsweetened, dry cocoa powder can contain up to 198 mg of caffeine (100515). To be on the safe side, cocoa should be used in amounts that provide less than 400 mg of caffeine daily. Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine naturally found in ingredients such as cocoa does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product. Cocoa and dark chocolate products worldwide also contain heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. In the US, one ounce (approximately 28 grams) of most commercially available dark chocolate products tested contained levels of lead and/or cadmium above the maximum allowable dose level for California, with cadmium levels generally increasing with the percentage of cocoa (109847,109848,109849). Advise patients to consume cocoa in moderation. ...when used topically. Cocoa butter is used extensively as a base for ointments and suppositories and is generally considered safe (11).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when dark chocolate is used orally. Cocoa and dark chocolate products worldwide contain heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. In the US, one ounce (approximately 28 grams) of most commercially available dark chocolate products tested contained levels of lead and/or cadmium above the maximum allowable dose level for California, with cadmium levels generally increasing with the percentage of cocoa (109847,109848,109849). Children are at increased risk of adverse effects from intake of lead and/or cadmium. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of other chocolate-based products that typically contain smaller quantities of cocoa.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally in moderate amounts. However, due to the caffeine content of cocoa preparations, intake should be closely monitored during pregnancy to ensure moderate consumption. Fetal blood concentrations of caffeine approximate maternal concentrations (4260). Some research has found that intrauterine exposure to even modest amounts of caffeine, based on maternal blood levels during the first trimester, is associated with a shorter stature in children ages 4-8 years (109846). While many cocoa products contain only small amounts of caffeine (about 2-35 mg per serving) (2708,3900), unsweetened, dry cocoa powder can contain up to 198 mg of caffeine per cup (100515). According to a review by Health Canada, and a subsequent large meta-analysis conducted in the US, doses of up to 300 mg daily can be consumed during pregnancy without an increased risk of spontaneous abortion, still birth, preterm birth, fetal growth retardation, or congenital malformations (11733,98806). To be on the safe side, cocoa should be used in amounts that provide less than 300 mg of caffeine daily. Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine found in ingredients such as cocoa, which naturally contains caffeine, does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in large amounts. Caffeine found in cocoa crosses the placenta producing fetal blood concentrations similar to maternal levels (4260). Consumption of caffeine in amounts over 300 mg daily is associated with a significantly increased risk of miscarriage in some studies (16014,98806). Additionally, high intake of caffeine during pregnancy have been associated with premature delivery, low birth weight, and loss of the fetus (6). While many cocoa products contain only small amounts of caffeine (about 2-35 mg per serving) (2708,3900), unsweetened, dry cocoa powder can contain up to 198 mg of caffeine per cup (100515). To be on the safe side, cocoa should be used in amounts that provide less than 300 mg of caffeine daily (2708). Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine found in ingredients such as cocoa, which naturally contains caffeine, does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product. Cocoa and dark chocolate products worldwide also contain heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. In the US, one ounce (approximately 28 grams) of most commercially available dark chocolate products tested contained levels of lead and/or cadmium above the maximum allowable dose level for California, with cadmium levels generally increasing with the percentage of cocoa (109847,109848,109849). Large doses or excessive intake of cocoa should be avoided during pregnancy.

LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used in moderate amounts or in amounts commonly found in foods. Due to the caffeine content of cocoa preparations, intake should be closely monitored while breastfeeding. During lactation, breast milk concentrations of caffeine are thought to be approximately 50% of serum concentrations. Moderate consumption of cocoa would likely result in very small amounts of caffeine exposure to a nursing infant (6). Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine found in ingredients such as cocoa, which naturally contains caffeine, does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in large amounts. Consumption of excess chocolate (16 oz per day) may cause irritability and increased bowel activity in the infant (6026). Cocoa and dark chocolate products worldwide also contain heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. In the US, one ounce (approximately 28 grams) of most commercially available dark chocolate products tested contained levels of lead and/or cadmium above the maximum allowable dose level for California, with cadmium levels generally increasing with the percentage of cocoa (109847,109848,109849). Large doses or excessive intake of cocoa should be avoided during lactation.

(Read more about COCOA)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts found in foods. CLA occurs naturally in milk fat, beef, and the meat of other ruminant animals (5924,5925,5932,5933).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts of up to 6. 8 grams daily, short-term (2819,2821,3153,4947,10410,11327).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts found in foods. CLA occurs naturally in milk fat, beef, and the meat of other ruminant animals (5924,5925,5932,5933).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts. Some evidence suggests that CLA 3 grams daily can be taken safely for up to 7 months (45713).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts found in foods (5924,5932,5933). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of CLA when used in medicinal amounts during pregnancy or lactation; avoid using.

(Read more about CONJUGATED LINOLEIC ACID (CLA))

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately with lactose-containing foods. Lactase has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US when prepared from Candida pseudotropicalis or Kluyveromyces lactis (104108,104109). Lactase has been used safely in doses up to 9900 international units (IU) and up to 13,500 food chemical codex (FCC) units (2371,2372,2373,106669).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately with lactose-containing foods.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately with lactose-containing foods.

(Read more about LACTASE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately (11726,11727,11728,11729,11730,93729). ...when used parenterally and appropriately (2275,2276,2278,11726,11727,11728,11729). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of MCTs when used topically.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about MEDIUM CHAIN TRIGLYCERIDES (MCTs))

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally as a food additive. Polydextrose is considered by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be safe when used as a food additive, provided a single serving contains less than 15 grams (26210).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in divided doses up to 50 grams daily for 12 weeks (27193,34118,98658,98659,106478). However, polydextrose can have laxative effects when taken orally in doses greater than 90 grams daily or greater than 50 grams as a single dose (27193,106478).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in higher doses. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has determined that there is no need for an acceptable daily intake of polydextrose when used as a food additive (106478). However, polydextrose can have laxative effects when taken orally in doses greater than 90 grams daily or greater than 50 grams as a single dose (27193,106478).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Polydextrose appears to be safe for infants when administered at doses of 2-4 grams per liter of formula and for children aged 4-8 years when administered at doses of about 4 grams daily. While some studies show no adverse effects of polydextrose, others suggest a potential for increased abdominal pain, diarrhea, and eczema (26709,27200,106482).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about POLYDEXTROSE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in amounts commonly found in foods. When used as a substitute for other dietary oils, the recommended intake of high-oleic acid sunflower oil is 20 grams (1.5 tablespoons) daily (9780,98563). ...when used topically and appropriately, short-term. Sunflower oil has been applied to the skin twice daily for up to 6 weeks (76687). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sunflower oil when used as an oral rinse.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in amounts commonly found in foods.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when applied topically and appropriately, short-term. Sunflower oil has been applied to the skin of infants daily for up to 2 months (96144,96145,105524,108143). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sunflower oil when used orally in larger amounts as medicine.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in amounts commonly found in foods. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sunflower oil when used in amounts greater than those found in food.

(Read more about SUNFLOWER OIL)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Whey protein up to 30 grams has been safely used in clinical trials for up to 6 months (4930,16728,16729,105587).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately as a dietary protein in food or infant formula. Hydrolyzed whey protein-based formula has been safely used in infants for up to 6 months in clinical trials (4927,105585,105594).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about WHEY PROTEIN)

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Clinical research shows that some casein peptides, including the lactotripeptides isoleucine-proline-proline (IPP) and valine-proline-proline (VPP), can modestly reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension (103763,103765,103770,103772). Theoretically, combining these casein peptides with antihypertensive drugs might increase the risk of hypotension.  Details Some antihypertensive drugs include captopril (Capoten), enalapril (Vasotec), losartan (Cozaar), valsartan (Diovan), diltiazem (Cardizem), amlodipine (Norvasc), hydrochlorothiazide (HydroDiuril), furosemide (Lasix), and many others.

(Read more about CASEIN PEPTIDES)

ACE INHIBITORS (ACEIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking cocoa with ACEIs might increase the risk of adverse effects.  Details Human research shows that dark chocolate can inhibit ACE (42112). Additionally, prolonged angioedema in an elderly patient on an ACE inhibitor was precipitated with intake of diabetic chocolate (42049).

ADENOSINE (Adenocard) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cocoa might decrease the vasodilatory effects of adenosine and interfere with its use prior to stress testing.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine is a competitive inhibitor of adenosine at the cellular level. However, caffeine does not seem to affect supplemental adenosine because high interstitial levels of adenosine overcome the antagonistic effects of caffeine. It is recommended that methylxanthines and methylxanthine-containing products be stopped 24 hours prior to pharmacological stress tests. However, methylxanthines appear more likely to interfere with dipyridamole than adenosine-induced stress testing (11771).

ALCOHOL (Ethanol) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Alcohol reduces caffeine metabolism. Concomitant use of alcohol can increase caffeine serum concentrations and the risk of caffeine adverse effects (6370).

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa may increase the risk of bleeding if used with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.  Details Clinical research shows that intake of cocoa can inhibit platelet adhesion, aggregation, and activity (6085,17076,41928,41948,41957,41958,41995,42014,42070,42145) and increase aspirin-induced bleeding time (23800).

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking cocoa with antihypertensive drugs might increase the risk of hypotension.  Details Clinical research shows that cocoa can modestly decrease blood pressure in hypertensive and normotensive patients (13166,14306,15655,15752,17187,42059,42092,42107,42137,42143)(42169,103249,109446).

BETA-ADRENERGIC AGONISTS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, large amounts of cocoa might increase the cardiac inotropic effects of beta-agonists.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Theoretically, large amounts of caffeine might increase cardiac inotropic effects of beta-agonists (15). A case of atrial fibrillation associated with consumption of large quantities of chocolate in a patient with chronic albuterol inhalation abuse has also been reported (42075).

CIMETIDINE (Tagamet) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the effects and adverse effects of caffeine in cocoa.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Cimetidine decreases caffeine clearance by 30% to 50% (15,506).

CONTRACEPTIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the effects and adverse effects of caffeine found in cocoa.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Oral contraceptives decrease the rate of caffeine clearance by 40% to 65% (2714,11737).

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) INHIBITORS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) (3941,5051,11741,23557,23573,23580,24958,24959,24960,24962), (24964,24965,24967,24968,24969,24971,38081,48603). Theoretically, drugs that inhibit CYP1A2 may decrease the clearance rate of caffeine from cocoa and increase caffeine levels.

DIPYRIDAMOLE (Persantine) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cocoa might decrease the vasodilatory effects of dipyridamole and interfere with its use prior to stress testing.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine may inhibit dipyridamole-induced vasodilation (11770,11772). It is recommended that methylxanthines and methylxanthine-containing products be stopped 24 hours prior to pharmacological stress tests (11770). Methylxanthines appear more likely to interfere with dipyridamole than adenosine-induced stress testing (11771).

DISULFIRAM (Antabuse) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, disulfiram might increase the risk of adverse effects from caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. In human research, disulfiram decreases the rate of caffeine clearance (11840).

DIURETIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, using cocoa with diuretic drugs might increase the risk of hypokalemia.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. In excessive amounts, caffeine can reduce potassium levels due to stimulation of the sodium-potassium pump (23579,37905,37953,38003,38034). Diuretics can also cause lower potassium levels.

EPHEDRINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk for stimulant adverse effects.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. There is evidence that using ephedrine with caffeine might increase the risk of serious life-threatening or debilitating adverse effects such as hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, seizures, and death (1275,6486,10307).

ESTROGENS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, estrogens might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Estrogen inhibits caffeine metabolism (2714).

FLUCONAZOLE (Diflucan) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, fluconazole might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Fluconazole decreases caffeine clearance by approximately 25% (11022).

FLUTAMIDE (Eulexin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa might increase the levels and adverse effects of flutamide.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. In vitro evidence suggests that caffeine can inhibit the metabolism of flutamide (23553).

FLUVOXAMINE (Luvox) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, fluvoxamine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Fluvoxamine reduces caffeine metabolism (6370).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, abrupt cocoa withdrawal might increase the levels and adverse effects of lithium.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. There are two case reports of lithium tremor that worsened upon abrupt coffee withdrawal (609,610).

METHOXSALEN (Oxsoralen) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, methoxsalen might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Methoxsalen can reduce caffeine metabolism (23572).

METMORPHIN (Glucophage) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, metformin might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that metformin can reduce caffeine metabolism (23571).

MEXILETINE (Mexitil) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, mexiletine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Mexiletine can decrease caffeine elimination by 50% (1260,11741). Concomitant use might increase the effects and adverse effects of caffeine in cocoa.

MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITORS (MAOIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk of a hypertensive crisis.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Large amounts of caffeine with MAOIs might precipitate a hypertensive crisis (15).

NICOTINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk of hypertension.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Concomitant use of caffeine and nicotine has been shown to have additive cardiovascular effects, including increased heart rate and blood pressure. Blood pressure was increased by 10.8/12.4 mmHg when the agents were used concomitantly (36549).

PENTOBARBITAL (Nembutal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cocoa might decrease the effects of pentobarbital.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine might negate the hypnotic effects of pentobarbital (13742).

PHENOBARBITAL (Luminal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa might reduce the effects of phenobarbital and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of phenobarbital (23558,23559,23561). The exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

PHENOTHIAZINES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, phenothiazines might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Phenothiazines can reduce the metabolism of caffeine by inhibiting cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) (23573,23574).

PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, phenylpropanolamine might increase the risk of hypertension, as well as the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Concomitant use of phenylpropanolamine and caffeine might cause an additive increase in blood pressure (11738). Phenylpropanolamine also seems to increase caffeine serum levels (13743).

PHENYTOIN (Dilantin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa might reduce the effects of phenytoin and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of phenytoin (23559,23561). The effect does not seem to be related to the seizure threshold-lowering effects of caffeine. However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, quinolone antibiotics might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Quinolones (also referred to as fluoroquinolones) decrease caffeine clearance (606,607,608).

RILUZOLE (Rilutek) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the levels and adverse effects of both caffeine and riluzole.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine and riluzole are both metabolized by cytochrome P450 1A2, and concomitant use might reduce metabolism of one or both agents (11739).

STIMULANT DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, concomitant use might increase stimulant adverse effects.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Concomitant use might increase the risk of stimulant adverse effects (11832).

TERBINAFINE (Lamisil) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, terbinafine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Terbinafine decreases the rate of caffeine clearance (11740).

THEOPHYLLINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cocoa might increase the levels and adverse effects of theophylline.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Large amounts of caffeine might inhibit theophylline metabolism (11741). Caffeine decreases theophylline clearance 23% to 29% (506).

TIAGABINE (Gabitril) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa tea might increase the levels and adverse effects of tiagabine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that chronic caffeine administration can increase the serum concentrations of tiagabine. However, concomitant use does not seem to reduce the antiepileptic effects of tiagabine (23561).

TICLOPIDINE (Ticlid) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, ticlopidine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. In vitro evidence suggests that ticlopidine can inhibit caffeine metabolism (23557). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

VALPROATE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa might reduce the effects of valproate and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of valproate (23558,23559,23561,37882). However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, verapamil might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Verapamil increases plasma caffeine concentrations by 25% (11741).

(Read more about COCOA)

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, CLA may increase the risk of bleeding if used with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.  Details Some clinical evidence suggests that intake of CLA reduces platelet aggregation by approximately 10% (45607). The clinical significance of this effect is unclear.

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = A Theoretically, taking CLA with antihypertensive drugs might increase the risk of hypotension.  Details Animal research suggests that a particular form of CLA reduces systolic blood pressure (45081). Also, some clinical research shows that CLA enhances the blood pressure-lowering effects of ramipril, an antihypertensive drug (45569).

RAMIPRIL (ALTACE) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = A Theoretically, taking black seed with ramipril might increase the risk of hypotension.  Details Some clinical research shows that CLA enhances the blood pressure-lowering effects of ramipril (45569).

(Read more about CONJUGATED LINOLEIC ACID (CLA))

(Read more about LACTASE)

(Read more about MEDIUM CHAIN TRIGLYCERIDES (MCTs))

(Read more about POLYDEXTROSE)

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, sunflower oil might decrease the effectiveness of antidiabetes medications.  Details A diet using sunflower oil as a fat source can cause increased fasting blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes (8132). Dose adjustments to diabetes medications might be necessary.

(Read more about SUNFLOWER OIL)

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, whey protein might reduce the absorption of bisphosphonates.  Details Whey protein contains minerals such as calcium that bind bisphosphonates in the gut (9,12937). Advise patients to take bisphosphonates at least 30 minutes before whey protein, but preferably at a different time of day.

LEVODOPA Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, whey protein might decrease levodopa absorption.  Details Small clinical studies show that concomitant ingestion of protein or high doses of leucine or isoleucine (100 mg/kg) and levodopa can exacerbate tremor, rigidity, and the "on-off" syndrome in patients with Parkinson disease (3291,3292,3293,3294,4944).

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, whey protein might decrease quinolone absorption.  Details Whey protein contains minerals, such as calcium, that can bind to quinolones in the gut (9,10339). To avoid this interaction, advise patients to take oral quinolones at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after whey protein.

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, whey protein might decrease tetracycline absorption.  Details Whey protein contains minerals, such as calcium, that bind to tetracyclines in the gut (9,1843). To avoid this interaction, advise patients to take oral tetracyclines at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after whey protein.

(Read more about WHEY PROTEIN)

General ...Orally, casein peptides are well tolerated in infants and adults. Side effects reported in clinical trials did not occur more frequently than with placebo (91262,91264,91299,91643,91673,91675).

(Read more about CASEIN PEPTIDES)

General ...Orally and topically, cocoa is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Borborygmi, constipation, diuresis, gastrointestinal discomfort, headaches, and nausea.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Tachycardia.

Cardiovascular ...Some cases of increased heart rate have been reported with oral cocoa use (13161,42132).

Dermatologic ...In some cases, when taken orally, cocoa can cause allergic skin reactions (13161). Topically, cocoa butter has occasionally caused a rash. In animals, it has been shown to block pores and cause acne; however, this has not been found in humans (11).

Gastrointestinal ...In human trials, chocolate consumption was associated with a higher incidence of flatulence, irritable bowel syndrome, upset stomach, gastric upset, borborygmi (a gurgling noise made by fluid or gas in the intestines), bloating, nausea, vomiting, and constipation or obstipation (41986,42221,41921,1374,42220,1373,42099,42097,42156,42123,18229,42169,42111). Chocolate consumption has been implicated as a provoking factor in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (41974,42005,41946,1374). Unpalatability has been reported (42079,42169). Consumption of chocolate and other sweet foods may lead to increased dental caries (42129,42030).

Genitourinary ...In some cases, when taken orally, cocoa can cause increased urination (13161).

Neurologic/CNS ...In some cases, when taken orally, cocoa can cause shakiness and might trigger migraine and other headaches (13161,42169,92271).

Other ...Due to the high sugar and caloric content of chocolate, there is concern about weight gain in people who consume large amounts of chocolate (17187).

(Read more about COCOA)

General ...Orally, CLA is well tolerated when found in foods. When taken in medicinal amounts, CLA seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Diarrhea, dyspepsia, flatulence, loose stools, and nausea.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare) :
Orally: Cases of hepatotoxicity have been reported.

Cardiovascular ...Some preliminary clinical research suggests that the t10,c12 isomer of CLA can decrease high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels (2821). This isomer of CLA, as well as a mixture of CLA isomers, seems to increase plasma triglyceride levels, the ratio of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol to HDL cholesterol, and the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol (45148,45468), although not all research has identified these effects (107475).
A meta-analysis of 6 randomized, controlled trials shows that administration of CLA in individuals who are overweight or obese significantly increases lipoprotein (a) levels, a value associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Subgroup analyses suggest this increase is more prominent in trials that are longer than 6 months in duration and with CLA doses of at least 3.5 grams daily (107475).

Endocrine ...Orally, CLA has been shown to increase insulin resistance and glucose concentrations, as well as decrease insulin sensitivity in some patients, including obese individuals or patients with type 2 diabetes (2821,13026,45145,45152,45513). Some evidence suggests that this effect is isomer-specific and occurs with only the t10,c12 isomer (2821,13026), while other evidence shows that decreased insulin sensitivity may also occur with the c9,t11 isomer or with a 50:50 mixture of c9,t11 and t10,c12 isomers (45145,45152).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, the most common adverse effect reported with CLA is gastrointestinal upset including diarrhea, nausea, loose stools, dyspepsia, bloating, and flatulence (3153,4947,45280,45705,45730). Esophageal irritation was reported in one patient who bit open and swallowed a capsule containing CLA (45577).

Hepatic ...Orally, clinical research shows that CLA 3 grams daily for 12 weeks does not affect liver outcome measures (105809). However, there are at least two case reports of hepatotoxicity. Asthenia, jaundice, and pruritus were reported in a 46-year-old female who consumed CLA for two weeks. Abnormal liver enzyme levels returned to normal following discontinuation of CLA supplementation (45483). Hepatotoxicity, presenting as fulminant hepatitis and characterized by anorexia, nausea, jaundice, choluria, and hepatic encephalopathy requiring liver transplantation has also been reported in a 63-year-old female taking a CLA-containing weight-loss supplement for one month (91589).

Musculoskeletal ...Orally, CLA has been reported to cause back ache in one individual in one clinical trial (45787).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, CLA may cause headache or fatigue (3153,45787). In one case report, a 50-year-old female presented with headache and subarachnoid hemorrhage due to reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) after taking a combination product containing green tea, L-carnitine, and CLA for one week. At 28 days after discontinuation of the combination product and surgery, angiography showed complete regression of vascular restrictions (97007). It is unclear if this adverse effect was due to CLA, another ingredient in the product, or a combination of ingredients.

Other ...Orally, CLA has been reported to cause halitosis in one patient in one clinical trial (45839).

(Read more about CONJUGATED LINOLEIC ACID (CLA))

General ...Orally, lactase is generally well tolerated. Occupational exposure to lactase can cause allergic reactions and contact dermatitis (96348).

Immunologic ...A case of lactase-induced contact dermatitis and immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic rhinoconjunctivitis has been reported in a worker exposed to powdered lactase. Allergy to lactase was confirmed by prick test, open application test, and chamber challenge test (96348).

(Read more about LACTASE)

General ...Orally, MCTs can cause significant gastrointestinal upset, especially with higher doses.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Abdominal discomfort, diarrhea, essential fatty acid deficiency, intestinal gas noises, irritability, nausea, reflux, vomiting. Gastrointestinal disturbances are thought to be associated with higher doses of MCT. Since MCTs are fats, excessive consumption can result in weight gain.

Cardiovascular ...There is some concern that MCTs may further increase the risk for hypertriglyceridemia in some preterm infants due to immature lipoprotein lipase activity in these infants. A case of extremely elevated triglyceride levels of 4,736 mg/dL and associated lipemia retinalis has been reported at 43 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA) for a preterm infant born at 30 weeks' gestational age. It was discovered that the baby had been receiving MCT supplements in addition to breast milk starting at 42 weeks' PMA. MCT supplements were discontinued. One month later triglycerides were reduced to 287 mg/dL, and the retinal vasculature had a normal hue. However, at 2-month follow-up, triglyceride levels were elevated to levels higher than normal for age despite MCT discontinuation. Investigators speculated that a genetic disorder of lipid metabolism may also have contributed to the elevated triglyceride levels in addition to use of MCTs (96330).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, MCTs can cause significant gastrointestinal upset. Diarrhea is the most commonly reported side effect (11723,93737,93738,101967). Other reported side effects include vomiting, irritability, nausea, reflux, abdominal discomfort, intestinal gas noises, and essential fatty acid deficiency (11723,93738,101967). Taking MCTs with food can reduce these adverse effects (93737). Gastrointestinal disturbances are thought to be associated with higher doses of MCT, such as 85 grams (93731).

Other ...Excessive consumption of MCTs can result in weight gain. MCT oil contains 6-8.5 calories per gram. One tablespoon provides about 14 grams and about 115 calories (11724).

(Read more about MEDIUM CHAIN TRIGLYCERIDES (MCTs))

General ...Orally, polydextrose seems to be well tolerated when used in doses of less than 50 grams.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Bloating, diarrhea, gas.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, polydextrose may cause gas, bloating, and loose stools (27194,27208,27212). These adverse effects are more common when single doses of more than 50 grams or daily doses of more than 90 grams are used. Higher doses of polydextrose (90 grams/day or more) may also cause transient diarrhea in some people (27193).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, one participant in one clinical study complained of transient dizziness after eating yogurt containing polydextrose 12. 5 grams (98660).

(Read more about POLYDEXTROSE)

General ...Orally and topically, sunflower oil is well tolerated.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Allergic reactions in sensitive individuals have been reported.

Immunologic ...Orally, sunflower oil can cause an allergic reaction in individuals sensitive to the Asteraceae/Compositae family. Members of this family include ragweed, chrysanthemums, marigolds, daisies, and many other herbs. However, the protein content of sunflower oil is very low. In one case report, an allergic response to sunflower oil did not occur despite presenting with severe allergy and anaphylaxis to sunflower seed (108140).

(Read more about SUNFLOWER OIL)

General ...Orally, whey protein is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Acne, bloating, cramps, diarrhea, fatigue, headache, nausea, reflux, reduced appetite, and thirst. Most adverse effects are dose-related.

Cardiovascular ...In one case report, use of an unclear quantity of whey protein over one month was thought to be probably responsible for the development of coronary embolism in three coronary arteries in a 33-year-old male with no history of atherosclerosis risk factors. The patient required treatment with intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor and heparin (96023).

Dermatologic ...Orally, whey protein has been reported to trigger the onset or worsening of acne. Multiple case reports in teenagers and young adults have associated intake of whey protein with the development of acne or the worsening of existing acneiform lesions. In these reports, the discontinuation of whey protein was typically associated with the clearance of acne lesions. In some cases, patients who were unresponsive to acne treatments while using whey protein became responsive after whey protein discontinuation (103965,103970,103971). Cow's milk, which is comprised of 20% whey protein, is also thought to exacerbate acne. It is theorized that this effect may be due to the growth factor and alpha-lactalbumin content of whey protein (103971,103982).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, whey protein, especially in higher doses of 2. 3-6.5 grams/kg daily, may cause increased bowel movements, nausea, thirst, bloating, esophageal reflux, cramps, and reduced appetite (2640,85961,85702,86043,86074,86075,86084,86089,86095).

Hepatic ...In two case reports, acute cholestatic liver injury occurred after consumption of the combination of whey protein and creatine supplements (46701,90319).

Musculoskeletal ...In one case report, a 26-year-old male experienced fasciitis, or swelling of the forearms, hands, and legs, after consuming the supplement Pure Whey (85895).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, high doses of whey protein may cause tiredness or fatigue and headache (2640). Mild drowsiness has also been reported (86089,86092,86124).

(Read more about WHEY PROTEIN)