R-PCT by Repp Sports

Athletic performance. Although there is interest in using oral arimistane for athletic performance, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of arimistane for this purpose.
Erectile dysfunction (ED). Although there is interest in using oral arimistane for ED, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of arimistane for this condition.
Muscle strength. Although there is interest in using oral arimistane for muscle strength, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of arimistane for this purpose.
Obesity. Although there is interest in using oral arimistane for obesity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of arimistane for this condition.
Psychological well-being. Although there is interest in using oral arimistane for psychological well-being, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of arimistane for this purpose.
Sexual arousal. Although there is interest in using oral arimistane for sexual arousal, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of arimistane for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate arimistane for these uses.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Oral ashwagandha may modestly improve symptoms of anxiety in patients with GAD. Details: Clinical practice guidelines from the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) provisionally recommend ashwagandha root extract at doses of 300-600 mg, standardized to 5% withanolides, daily as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in patients with GAD. This recommendation is based on a review of three preliminary clinical trials with consistent results (110318). Two of these studies are described below. A small clinical trial in patients with GAD who are taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) shows that taking ashwagandha 1 gram daily for 6 weeks reduces symptoms of anxiety by 48%, compared with a 27% reduction in patients taking placebo. Furthermore, by the end of treatment, 72% of patients taking ashwagandha were determined to have mild symptoms of GAD, compared with only 32% of those taking placebo (102687). Another preliminary clinical trial in patients aged 16 years and older with GAD shows that taking ashwagandha root powder granules 4 grams three times daily for 60 days moderately improves anxious mood in 58% of patients, compared with no moderate improvement in the placebo group. Mild improvement occurred in 82% of patients in the placebo group and 40% of patients in the ashwagandha group (90654).
Insomnia. Oral ashwagandha may modestly improve sleep in patients with insomnia or non-restorative sleep. Details: A small meta-analysis in patients with insomnia and healthy patients shows that taking a specific ashwagandha root extract (KSM-66, Ixoreal Biomed) 250-600 mg daily or a specific root and leaf extract (Shoden, Arjuna Natural) 120 mg daily for 6-12 weeks modestly improves overall sleep, as well as sleep quality, sleep latency, total sleep time, wake time after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency, when compared with placebo. Effects were more pronounced in those with insomnia, with doses of at least 600 mg daily, and with treatment durations of at least 8 weeks (106784). These findings may be limited by heterogeneity of the included studies. In patients with non-restorative sleep, clinical research shows that taking a specific ashwagandha extract (Shoden, Arjuna Natural Private Ltd) 125 mg daily for 6 weeks increases sleep quality by 72%, compared with an improvement of 29% in patients taking placebo. Small to moderate improvements also occurred in total sleep time, sleep latency, and number of times awake (103476).
Stress. Oral ashwagandha seems to help reduce stress and may also reduce stress-related weight gain. Details: A meta-analysis of seven small clinical studies in healthy adults, patients with chronic stress, or patients with psychiatric conditions shows that taking ashwagandha 240-1000 mg daily for 8-12 weeks improves stress when compared with placebo (109587). Clinical studies included in this meta-analysis that evaluated adults with chronic stress show that taking specific ashwagandha root extracts 240 mg daily (Shoden, Arjuna Natural Ltd.) or 300 mg twice daily (KSM-66, Ixoreal Biomed) for 60 days reduces perceived stress levels by 30% to 44% and decreases cortisol levels by 22% to 28% when compared with baseline. These improvements remain significant when compared with the changes seen for patients treated with placebo (90652,95617,101816,102682). In adults reporting moderate to high stress levels, clinical research shows that treatment with specific slow-release capsules containing another ashwagandha root extract (Prolanza), 300 mg daily for 90 days, lowers perceived stress scores and cortisol levels when compared with placebo (107371). In healthy college students, clinical research also shows that taking ashwagandha root extract 350 mg twice daily for 30 days improves qualitative perceptions of stress management, but not stress scores, when compared with placebo (109589,109590). Other clinical research shows that taking ashwagandha root extract 500 mg twice daily may prevent stress-related weight gain when compared with placebo (95617).

Aging. A small clinical study suggests that oral ashwagandha may modestly improve well-being, sleep, and alertness in elderly patients. Details: A small clinical trial in individuals aged 65-80 years shows that taking ashwagandha root extract (KSM-66, Ixoreal Biomed) 600 mg daily for 12 weeks improves overall well-being, sleep quality, and mental alertness by small to moderate amounts when compared with placebo (102684).
Antipsychotic-induced metabolic side effects. It is unclear if ashwagandha is beneficial for attenuating the metabolic side effects of antipsychotic agents. Details: One preliminary clinical trial shows that taking a specific ashwagandha extract (Cap Strelaxin, M/s Pharmanza Herbal Pvt. Ltd.) 400 mg three times daily for one month reduces serum triglycerides by 12% and fasting blood glucose by 15% when compared with baseline levels. Patients were taking atypical antipsychotics and had modestly elevated triglycerides and fasting blood glucose levels at baseline (90649). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
Anxiety. It is unclear if oral ashwagandha is beneficial for reducing anxiety. Details: One small clinical study shows that taking ashwagandha root (Swiss Herbals) 300 mg twice daily for 12 weeks, in combination with standard psychotherapy interventions, including dietary counseling, deep breathing exercise instruction, and a multivitamin, reduces anxiety scores when compared with standard psychotherapy interventions and placebo (19271). However, other clinical research in young adults shows that a specific ashwagandha root and leaf extract (NooGandha, Specnova LLC) 225 mg or 400 mg daily for 30 days produces similar improvements in self-reported anxiety, stress, and depression scores when compared with placebo (107370).
Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral ashwagandha for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ashwagandha for this condition.
Athletic performance. It is unclear if ashwagandha is beneficial for improving athletic performance. Details: A meta-analysis of four small clinical trials shows that taking ashwagandha increases aerobic capacity in athletes and non-athletes based on the measurement of maximum oxygen consumption. Effective doses ranged from 500-1000 mg daily for up to 12 weeks (102683). Another meta-analysis shows that taking ashwagandha in doses of 120-1250 mg daily, as a single dose or divided twice daily, for up to 6 months seems to improve muscle strength, speed, time to exhaustion, recovery time, and cardiorespiratory fitness in athletes and non-athletes (105824). However, the validity of this analysis is reduced by the lack of a control group, the varied training levels of the subjects, and the wide range of outcomes assessed. More research is needed to determine whether taking ashwagandha can improve athletic performance.
Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Oral ashwagandha has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In a preliminary clinical trial, children with ADHD were given a combination herbal extract formula (Nurture & Clarity), containing ashwagandha, white peony root, gotu kola, blue-green algae, bacopa, and sage, 3 mL three times daily for 4 months. Measures of attention, cognition, and impulse control improved significantly in children receiving ashwagandha when compared with placebo (19272). The dose of ashwagandha in the combination product was not reported, and the effect of ashwagandha alone in ADHD is unclear.
Back pain. Although there has been interest in using oral or topical ashwagandha for back pain, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ashwagandha for this condition.
Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral ashwagandha is beneficial for improving cognitive function in adults with bipolar disorder. Details: Clinical research shows that taking ashwagandha extract (Sensoril, Natreon, Inc.) 250 mg daily for 1 week and then 250 mg twice daily for 7 weeks, improves some, but not all, measures of cognition by a small-to-moderate amount when compared with placebo (90653).
Bronchitis. Although there has been interest in using oral ashwagandha for bronchitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ashwagandha for this condition.
Cerebellar ataxia. It is unclear if oral ashwagandha is beneficial for improving balance in patients with cerebellar ataxia. Details: A small, open-label study evaluating ashwagandha 500 mg three times daily in combination with Ayurvedic therapy for one month showed improvement in balance indices in subjects with cerebellar ataxia when compared with baseline (19273). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Additionally, it is unclear if this effect is due to ashwagandha, other ingredients, or the combination.
Chemotherapy-related fatigue. Evidence is limited to one small clinical study in patients with breast cancer. Details: In preliminary clinical research in patients with breast cancer, taking ashwagandha powdered root extract 2 grams (Himalaya Drug Co) three times daily through six cycles of chemotherapy decreases chemotherapy-related fatigue when compared with no treatment. Fatigue scores were 16% to 52% higher in the control group when compared to the ashwagandha group (90651).
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral ashwagandha is beneficial in patients with COPD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with stable COPD shows that taking ashwagandha root extract 250 mg twice daily for 12 weeks, along with conventional therapy, improves measures of lung function and exercise tolerance, but not quality of life, when compared with conventional therapy alone (109588).
Cognitive function. Although there has been interest in using oral ashwagandha for cognitive function, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ashwagandha for this condition.
Constipation. Oral ashwagandha has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in adults with constipation shows that taking a combination product containing ashwagandha root and ambrette fruit extracts 300 mg or 500 mg daily for 14 days improves bowel movement frequency and abdominal, rectal, and stool symptoms when compared with placebo (112114). It is unclear if these effects are due to ashwagandha, ambrette, or the combination. The validity of these effects is limited by the small sample size.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Oral ashwagandha has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults hospitalized with COVID-19 shows that taking a specific combination product, (Artovid-20, Bioved Pharmaceuticals) containing ashwagandha, ginger, turmeric, and Boswellia, 1,776 mg orally twice daily for 14 days shortens the duration of symptoms by 0.9 days when compared with placebo. Taking the combination product also modestly reduced the severity ratings of some symptoms, such as sore throat and cough, however, these improvements are unlikely to be clinically relevant (109899). Another small clinical study in adults with mild to moderate COVID-19 shows that taking ashwagandha 500 mg and ginger 1000 mg twice daily for 15 days reduces time to recovery by around 6 days and increases the rate of clinical cure 14-fold and 2.6-fold at days 5 and 7, respectively, when compared with a control. However, taking this combination does not appear to improve the proportion of patients with a negative COVID-19 test, viral clearance, serum antibodies, chest findings, or disease progression when compared with control (112094). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of blinding, and the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. Additionally, it is unclear if these effects are due to ashwagandha, ginger, or the combination.
Diabetes. It is unclear if oral ashwagandha is beneficial for type 2 diabetes. Details: In patients with type 2 diabetes, preliminary clinical research shows that ashwagandha 3 grams daily for 30 days decreases blood glucose to a degree similar to oral hypoglycemic drugs (19274). However, this study did not compare ashwagandha directly to a group taking oral hypoglycemic drugs.
Fibromyalgia. Although there has been interest in using oral ashwagandha for fibromyalgia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ashwagandha for this condition.
Hiccups. Although there has been interest in using oral ashwagandha for hiccups, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ashwagandha for this condition.
Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if ashwagandha is beneficial for hypercholesterolemia. Details: A very small clinical study in subjects with hypercholesterolemia shows that ashwagandha 3 grams daily for 30 days decreases serum cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol levels when compared with baseline (19274). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
Hypothyroidism. It is unclear if ashwagandha is beneficial for hypothyroidism. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with subclinical hypothyroidism shows that taking a specific ashwagandha root extract (KSM-66, Ixoreal Biomed) 300 mg twice daily for 8 weeks increases triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) levels by 42% and 20%, respectively, and reduces serum TSH levels by 17% from baseline. These changes are significant when compared with placebo (97292). However, the effects of ashwagandha on thyroid hormone levels in patients with overt hypothyroidism, or in patients taking prescription thyroid hormones, is unknown.
Infertility. Although there has been interest in using oral ashwagandha for infertility in females, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ashwagandha for this condition.
Male infertility. It is unclear if oral ashwagandha is beneficial for male infertility. Details: Preliminary clinical research in males with infertility shows that taking ashwagandha root powder for approximately 3 months modestly improves hormone levels, as well as sperm count and motility, when compared with baseline (19275,90650). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group. One study used a specific ashwagandha root extract (KSM-66 Ashwagandha, Ixoreal Biomed) 225 mg three times daily; another study provided doses of 5 grams daily (19275,90650).
Menopausal symptoms. Oral ashwagandha may be beneficial for menopausal symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults in perimenopause shows that taking a specific ashwagandha root extract (KSM-66, Ixoreal Biomed) 300 mg twice daily for 8 weeks improves menopausal symptom severity by 24%, compared with 11% in those receiving placebo. Quality of life and hot flashes also were improved in those taking ashwagandha (106785).
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). It is unclear if ashwagandha is beneficial for OCD. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking ashwagandha root extract 120 mg after meals for 6 weeks, in conjunction with prescribed selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), might reduce OCD symptom severity when compared with prescribed SSRIs alone. The dose was initiated at 30 mg daily and increased by 30 mg every 4 days. Although OCD scores were significantly reduced when compared with placebo, it should be noted that scores were already significantly lower in the placebo group at baseline (95618).
Osteoarthritis. Oral ashwagandha has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In patients with osteoarthritis, taking a specific combination supplement, containing ashwagandha 450 mg, Ayurvedic zinc complex 50 mg, guggul 100 mg, and turmeric 50 mg (Articulin-F) two capsules three times daily for 3 months reduces symptoms of pain and swelling when compared with placebo. However, there were no radiological improvements (19276). It is unclear if this effect is due to ashwagandha, other ingredients, or the combination.
Parkinson disease. Oral ashwagandha has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In patients with Parkinson disease, a small clinical study shows that taking a product containing ashwagandha 14.5 grams, cowhage 4.5 grams, Hyoscyamus reticulantus 0.75 grams, and Sida cordifolia 14.5 grams in lukewarm milk twice daily for 56 days improves symptoms like tremor, stiffness, and cramps when compared with baseline. The therapy followed 28 days of cleansing or eliminative therapy using Ayurvedic remedies (6899). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Also, it is unclear if these effects are due to ashwagandha, other ingredients, or the combination. Cowhage contains levodopa, which may contribute to any benefit seen with this combination product.
Psychological well-being. It is unclear if oral ashwagandha is beneficial for improving psychological well-being in college students. Details: A small clinical study in healthy college students shows that taking ashwagandha root extract 350 mg twice daily for 30 days improves perceptions of well-being, including improvements in energy, mental clarity, food cravings, and sleep quality, when compared with placebo. Qualitative analysis also suggests these students had improvements in stress management, but stress scores were not reduced when compared with placebo (109589,109590).
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if ashwagandha is beneficial for improving symptoms of RA. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking ashwagandha powder 5 grams twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 4 weeks of sidh makardhwaj (a mixture of gold, mercury, and sulfur) 100 mg with honey daily, modestly improves symptoms in about 50% of males and 60% of females with RA when compared with baseline (95620). The lack of a control group limits the validity of this finding. Additionally, the effect of ashwagandha powder alone is unclear.
Sexual dysfunction. Small clinical studies suggest that oral ashwagandha root extract may help improve sexual arousal and sexual desire in some females and males with sexual dysfunction. Details: Two, small clinical studies in adult females with sexual dysfunction show that taking ashwagandha root extract (KSM-66, Ixoreal Biomed) 300 mg twice daily with food for 8 weeks in conjunction with or without counseling increases the number of successful sexual encounters and improves orgasms, satisfaction, lubrication, and arousal when compared with placebo or counseling alone (95619,110492). Also, a small clinical study in adult males with low sexual desire shows that taking the same ashwagandha root extract 300 mg twice daily after meals for 8 weeks improves subjective sexual functioning scores, including measures of sexual arousal, sexual desire, sexual behavior, and orgasm, when compared with placebo (109586).
Smoking cessation. Oral ashwagandha has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with a history of smoking 5 or more cigarettes daily for at least 3 years shows that taking a specific combination product containing ashwagandha 100 mg, Indian gooseberry, tribulus, bacopa, Albizia lebbeck, licorice, clove, ginger, cowhage, holy basil, and turmeric (Smotect, Smotect India) daily for 3 months reduces the number of cigarettes smoked daily and levels of alveolar carbon monoxide and carboxyhemoglobin but does not improve lung capacity when compared with placebo (112115). It is unclear if these effects are due to ashwagandha, other ingredients, or the combination.
Tuberculosis. Although there has been interest in using oral ashwagandha for tuberculosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ashwagandha for this condition.
Vitiligo. Although there has been interest in using oral ashwagandha for vitiligo, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ashwagandha for this condition.
Wrinkled skin. It is unclear if topical ashwagandha is beneficial in individuals with wrinkled skin. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults with photoaged skin shows that applying ashwagandha root extract 8% lotion daily for 60 days improves physician-rated scores for skin wrinkles, hydration, brightness, tone, and pigmentation and improves other measures of skin elasticity and hydration when compared with placebo. However, changes in melanin content did not differ between treatment groups (111538).
Wound healing. Although there has been interest in using topical ashwagandha for healing of skin ulcers and skin sores, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ashwagandha for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate ashwagandha for these uses.

Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for allergic rhinitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
Athletic performance. Oral black pepper has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical trial in untrained males shows that taking a supplement containing black pepper extract 10 mg, caffeine 400 mg, capsicum extract 66.7 mg, and niacin 40 mg as a single dose prior to exercise does not improve strength, time to exhaustion, or maximal oxygen consumption when compared with placebo (37873).
Depression. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
Diarrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for diarrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
Dysmenorrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for dysmenorrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
Dyspepsia. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for dyspepsia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
Fall prevention. It is unclear if inhaling black pepper oil as aromatherapy is beneficial for fall prevention in older adults. Details: One small clinical study in older adults shows that applying black pepper oil near the right side of the nose as an olfactory stimulant improves stability while the eyes are closed during a one-minute trial when compared with the application of water. The improvement with black pepper oil is comparable to the improvement seen with the application of lavender oil (29160). It is unclear if any benefit persists after inhalation of black pepper oil.
Fatigue. It is unclear if oral black pepper is beneficial in patients with fatigue. Details: One small clinical trial in adults with below-average energy levels shows that taking black pepper 2 grams as a single dose does not improve sustained attention, motivation to perform cognitive tasks, or feelings of mental energy and mental fatigue when compared with placebo (91731).
Flatulence. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for flatulence, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
Headache. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for headache, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
Insect bite. Topical black pepper has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical trial shows that applying a specific product (Trikatu) containing black pepper, long pepper, and ginger, as well as camphor, eucalyptus oil, and menthol, directly to mosquito bites does not reduce papule size, erythema, edema, or pruritis when compared with a control compound containing the same base ingredients but without the pepper and ginger components (89893).
Obesity. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for obesity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
Pain (chronic). Although there has been interest in using topical black pepper for chronic pain related to various etiologies, including osteoarthritis, postherpetic neuralgia, and peripheral neuropathy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for these conditions.
Rhinosinusitis. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for rhinosinusitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
Sexual desire. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for increasing sexual desire, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
Smoking cessation. It is unclear if inhaling black pepper essential oil as aromatherapy is effective for smoking cessation. Details: One small clinical trial in adult male smokers who were deprived from smoking overnight shows that inhaling a vapor from the essential oil of black pepper, as needed over a 3-hour period, reduces cigarette cravings, negative feelings, and anxiety when compared with a placebo vapor (29159). Another small clinical study in patients addicted to dipping, chewing, or smoking tobacco shows that placing a drop of black pepper essential oil on tissue paper and inhaling for 2 minutes at least three times a day for 3 days reduces nicotine cravings when compared to baseline (90502).
Swallowing dysfunction. It is unclear if inhaling black pepper oil as aromatherapy is beneficial in patients with swallowing dysfunction. Details: One small clinical study in post-stroke residents of nursing homes shows that one minute of olfactory stimulation with black pepper oil before each meal for 30 days decreases swallowing reflex latency by 11 seconds and increases the number of swallowing movements by 3.3 when compared to baseline (29161). A small clinical trial in children with neurological disorders who were on long-term enteral nutrition shows that applying black pepper oil to the nostrils or nasal cavity for one minute improves the amount of oral intake and swallowing movement in 63% of patients. Although oral intake increased, the need for enteral nutrition was not eliminated (29162).
Vitiligo. It is unclear if topical piperine oil, a constituent of black pepper, is beneficial in patients with vitiligo. Details: A small clinical study in patients with vitiligo shows that applying piperine oil 1% daily in addition to receiving narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) light therapy every other day for 3 months improves repigmentation more rapidly when compared with using NB-UVB alone (103820). More evidence is needed to rate black pepper for these uses.

Asthma. Research on the effects for coleus for asthma is preliminary and contradictory. In one preliminary clinical trial a single-dose inhalation of the powdered coleus constituent, forskolin, 10 mg, from a Spinhaler inhaler significantly increased forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in patients with asthma (7281,44432). Another preliminary trial found that a specific forskolin product (Pro-longevity Forskolin, Life Extension Foundation Buyers Club, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA) providing forskolin 10 mg per day orally for 6 months did not improve lung function, but resulted in fewer asthma attacks compared to two inhalations of sodium cromoglycate three times daily for 6 months (91889). However, in another preliminary trial oral forskolin 10 mg taken daily for 2 months, neither reduced asthma attacks nor improved lung function compared to baseline or compared to beclomethasone inhalations (91883).
Dry eye. Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific combination supplement (Kronek, SOOFT Italia, Montegiorgio, Italy) containing an extract of Coleus forskolii 150 mg (10% forskolin), rutin 200 mg, thiamine 0.7 mg, and riboflavin 0.8 mg, 2 capsules by mouth daily for 30 days moderately decreases dry eye symptoms compared to placebo (91888). It is unclear if this benefit is due to coleus, other ingredients, or the combination.
Erectile dysfunction (ED). Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that adding the coleus constituent forskolin 1 mg/mL to once daily intracavernosal injections of phentolamine, papaverine, and prostaglandin E1 may improve penile rigidity and increase the average erection duration in impotent men compared to injections of phentolamine, papaverine, and prostaglandin E1 alone (44441).
Hypertension. Preliminary clinical research shows that taking coleus root tuber 1 gram or coleus whole root 1.4 grams three times daily after food for 2 months modestly decreases blood pressure compared to baseline in elderly patients with hypertension (91884).
Dilated cardiomyopathy. There is some evidence that intravenous coleus, starting at 0.5 mcg/kg/minute, increasing at 15 minute intervals to 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mcg/kg/minute, is effective at improving cardiac output and pulmonary vascular pressures in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (7278).
Glaucoma. Preliminary clinical research shows that taking two tablets of a specific combination supplement (Kronek Sooft Italia SpA, Montegiorgio, Italy) containing forskolin 15 mg, rutin 200 mg, vitamin B1 1.5 mg, and vitamin B2 1.5 mg for 7 or 30 days prevents increases in intraocular pressure and decreases intraocular pressure by 10% in glaucoma patients (91887,91890). Preliminary clinical research on another specific combination supplement (Gangliolife, SOOFT Italia), two tablets taken twice daily for 1 year in addition to standard topical therapy results in a decrease in intraocular pressure compared to standard therapy alone in patients with primary open angle glaucoma. One tablet of the supplement contains coleus extract 150 mg (standardized to 10% forskolin), homotaurine 100 mg, L- carnosine 50 mg, vitamin B1 1.1 mg, vitamin B2 1.4 mg, vitamin B6 1.4 mg, folic acid 0.2 mg, and magnesium 150 mg (91886).
Obesity. Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific coleus supplement (Forslean, Sabina Corp., Piscataway, NJ) containing a 10% forskolin extract 250 mg twice daily for 12 weeks does not affect weight, but decreases body fat by 4.14% compared to a 0.96% decrease in a placebo group in overweight and obese men (91882). Another small clinical trial shows that taking a coleus extract capsule 250 mg twice daily before meals for 12 weeks does not further reduce weight compared to taking placebo in overweight and obese patients following a calorie-restricted diet (91885). More evidence is needed to rate coleus for these uses.

Anxiety. Although there has been interest in using oral cowhage for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cowhage for this purpose.
Erythema. Although there has been interest in using topical cowhage for erythema, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cowhage for this purpose.
Hyperprolactinemia. Although there has been interest in using oral cowhage for hyperprolactinemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cowhage for this purpose.
Myalgia. Although there has been interest in using topical cowhage for myalgia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cowhage for this purpose.
Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral cowhage is beneficial in patients with Parkinson disease. Details: Very small clinical studies in patients with Parkinson disease suggest that taking a specific cowhage seed extract standardized to 3.3% levodopa (Zandopa, formerly HP-200; Zandu Pharmaceuticals), or other cowhage products that contain levodopa 75-400 mg orally once daily for up to 12 weeks modestly improves Parkinson disease scores when compared with baseline (7020,7203). Two very small clinical trials enrolling a total of 26 patients with Parkinson disease suggests that taking a single dose of cowhage powder, providing levodopa 1000-2000 mg or 12.5-17.5 mg/kg, is similarly effective after 90 minutes when compared with prescription levodopa 200 mg or 3.5 mg/kg as a single dose, with or without carbidopa and benserazide (12232,97266). It is unclear how these products would compare if they provided similar amounts of levodopa, or if they were taken for an extended duration.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although there has been interest in using topical cowhage for RA, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cowhage for this purpose.
Sexual desire. Although there has been interest in using oral cowhage to increase sexual desire, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cowhage for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate cowhage for these uses.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Although there is interest in using oral diindolylmethane for BPH, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of diindolylmethane for this condition.
Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral diindolylmethane is beneficial in patients at high risk for developing breast cancer. Details: Preliminary clinical research in healthy pre- and post-menopausal patients at high risk for breast cancer due to the BRCA mutation shows that taking diindolylmethane (DIM-Evail, Designs for Health Inc) 100 mg daily for 1 year is associated with a 5% decrease in breast density, as measured by the amount of fibroglandular tissue, when compared with baseline (103830). It is unclear whether this reduces the risk of developing breast cancer. Also, the validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
Cervical dysplasia. It is unclear if oral diindolylmethane is beneficial in patients with cervical dysplasia. Details: Clinical research in patients with mild cervical abnormalities shows that taking a specific product (BioResponse-DIM, BioResponse) as 150 mg, providing 45 mg diindolylmethane, daily for 6 months does not improve colposcopy or biopsy results when compared with placebo (93836). Additionally, clinical research in patients with grade 2 or 3 cervical neoplasia shows that taking this same product as 2 mg/kg diindolylmethane daily for 12 weeks does not affect Pap smear, colposcopy, or histology results when compared with placebo; however, both groups showed significant improvements when compared with baseline (47709).
Colorectal cancer. Although there is interest in using oral diindolylmethane for colorectal cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of diindolylmethane for this condition.
Mastalgia. Although there is interest in using oral diindolylmethane for mastalgia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of diindolylmethane for this condition.
Obesity. Although there is interest in using oral diindolylmethane for obesity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of diindolylmethane for this condition.
Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Although there is interest in using oral diindolylmethane for PMS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of diindolylmethane for this condition.
Prostate cancer. Although there is interest in using oral diindolylmethane for prostate cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of diindolylmethane for this condition.
Uterine cancer. Although there is interest in using oral diindolylmethane for uterine cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of diindolylmethane for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate diindolylmethane for these uses.

There is insufficient reliable information available about the effectiveness of laxogenin.

EFFECTIVE

Acetaminophen poisoning. Oral and intravenous N-acetyl cysteine, as prescription drug products, are effective for treating acetaminophen poisoning. Details: Administering prescription N-acetyl cysteine orally or intravenously is effective in decreasing mortality rate and preventing the permanent sequelae of acetaminophen poisoning (17,64513,64745,64746). N-acetyl cysteine injection and oral effervescent tablets are approved by the US FDA for this use (102147,104164).
Atelectasis. When inhaled, N-acetyl cysteine is effective for treating atelectasis. Details: N-acetyl cysteine solution for inhalation is effective for atelectasis caused by mucus obstruction (15,91650) and is approved by the US FDA for this use (102147).
Bronchial diagnostic studies. When inhaled, N-acetyl cysteine is effective for bronchial diagnostic study preparation. Details: N-acetyl cysteine solution for inhalation is helpful when used to prepare people for bronchial diagnostic studies (15,91650), and is approved by the US FDA for this use (102147).
Tracheostomy care. When inhaled and used as adjunct therapy, N-acetyl cysteine is effective for preventing endotracheal crusting in patients with a tracheostomy. Details: N-acetyl cysteine solution for inhalation is effective when used as an adjunct for preventing endotracheal crusting in tracheostomy care (15), and is approved by the US FDA for this use (102147).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

Angina. Oral or intravenous N-acetyl cysteine may reduce nitroglycerin tolerance in patients with angina. However, some studies suggest that N-acetyl cysteine might increase the risk for severe headaches and hypotension when used with intravenous or transdermal nitroglycerin. Details: Administering N-acetyl cysteine orally or intravenously, in combination with nitroglycerin, seems to improve unstable angina pectoris (2245,2246). There is also some clinical research showing that concurrent intravenous or oral administration of N-acetyl cysteine reduces the development of nitroglycerin tolerance (832,2245,64546). However, other research shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine orally does not reduce the development of nitroglycerin tolerance in angina patients (2281,2282). Additionally, severe headache and hypotension can occur when oral N-acetyl cysteine and nitroglycerin are administered together, which may limit the feasibility of concomitant use (2245).
Autism spectrum disorder. Oral N-acetyl cysteine may improve irritability, but not other symptoms, associated with autism spectrum disorder. Details: One small clinical study in children with autism shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 900 mg daily for 4 weeks followed by 900 mg twice daily for 4 weeks and then 900 mg three times daily for 4 weeks improves symptoms of irritability when compared with placebo (91241). Another small clinical study in children and adolescents with autism shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 1200 mg daily plus risperidone for 8 weeks is more effective than risperidone alone for reducing irritability (91239). However, it does not seem to improve other symptoms, such as hyperactivity, social withdrawal, lethargy, repetitive behaviors, and inappropriate speech (91239,91241,97047).
Bronchitis. Via inhalation, N-acetyl cysteine is FDA-approved for managing acute episodes of bronchitis. Oral N-acetyl cysteine may help to reduce the occurrence of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis when used for 3-36 months. Details: N-acetyl cysteine solution for inhalation is FDA-approved for the management of acute bronchopulmonary disease, including bronchitis (102147). Taking N-acetyl cysteine 1200-1500 mg daily orally for 4 months seems to reduce shortness of breath and coughing, and improve lung capacity, in patients with sulfur mustard-induced bronchitis (64586,64614). Also, taking N-acetyl cysteine orally, usually 400-600 mg daily, seems to reduce the risk of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis by a moderate amount when used for 3-36 months (6176,64419,102660). Symptom improvement has been shown to occur in 61% of patients taking N-acetyl cysteine, compared with 34% of those taking placebo (102660). However, oral N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to have a beneficial effect on chronic bronchitis when administered for shorter durations (64685,64696,64737,64818).
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Taking N-acetyl cysteine orally seems to decrease the exacerbation rate and improve symptoms in patients with moderate to severe COPD, particularly those who are not taking inhaled corticosteroids. Also, taking N-acetyl cysteine along with standard therapy appears to improve recovery in patients hospitalized due to an acute exacerbation. Details: N-acetyl cysteine solution for inhalation is FDA-approved for the management of chronic bronchopulmonary disease, such as COPD (102147). A meta-analysis of 12 clinical studies involving 2,691 patients shows that N-acetyl cysteine, given as 257-1800 mg daily for at least 6 months, decreases the number of patients experiencing at least one COPD exacerbation by 15% when compared with placebo; however, it is not associated with a reduction in COPD exacerbation rate or improvement in measures of lung function (97046). Some smaller studies have shown a higher improvement rate of 23% to 40%, with the greatest efficacy seen in patients who are not already taking inhaled corticosteroids (10429,64552). While some studies have failed to show any benefit of N-acetyl cysteine, the lack of benefit appears to correlate with a treatment duration of less than 6 months (64704,97039,97046). The 2015 guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians and Canadian Thoracic Society (AECOPD) recommend that N-acetyl cysteine be considered as an adjunctive treatment option for patients with moderate to severe COPD and a history of 2 or more exacerbations in the previous 2 years (97043). The 2017 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guideline also states that N-acetyl cysteine may be an appropriate treatment option for patients who are not able to use inhaled corticosteroids (97050). In hospitalized patients with an acute exacerbation of COPD, preliminary clinical research shows that adding N-acetyl cysteine 1200 mg daily to regular treatment has a moderate effect on wheeze and the need for oxygen over a 7-day period when compared with regular treatment alone (102653).
Contrast induced nephropathy. Oral or intravenous administration of N-acetyl cysteine seems to prevent contrast induced nephropathy in patients with kidney dysfunction. However, it is not beneficial in those with normal kidney function or diabetes. Details: Large meta-analyses of over 150 clinical studies in patients with reduced kidney function (serum creatinine of 1.2-2.4 mg/dL) show that oral N-acetyl cysteine is more effective than either sodium bicarbonate or saline hydration alone in preventing contrast agent-induced kidney damage after coronary angiography, computed tomography, left heart catheterization, and/or percutaneous coronary intervention. N-acetyl cysteine in combination with sodium bicarbonate appears to have similar efficacy to N-acetyl cysteine monotherapy, with an odds ratio of 0.62-0.67, when compared with hydration alone. Pretreatment with high-dose statin, prostaglandin, or theophylline appears to be more effective than N-acetyl cysteine, with odds ratios of 0.37, 0.37, and 0.48, respectively, when compared with hydration alone. However, combination treatment with N-acetyl cysteine and a high-dose statin appears to provide the greatest benefit of all treatments studied, with an odds ratio of 0.31, when compared with hydration alone. No treatments demonstrate significant efficacy in reducing the risk of contrast induced nephropathy in patients with diabetes (97036,97038). Some evidence also suggests that N-acetyl cysteine may have similar effects to fenoldopam in reducing the risk of contrast induced nephropathy in patients with reduced kidney function (64489,97036,97038). N-acetyl cysteine does not reduce the risk of contrast induced nephropathy in patients with normal kidney function (mean serum creatinine less than 1.2 mg/dL) when compared with control (64538,64573,64617). Although many individual studies have failed to show a significant benefit (11430,64514,64543,64561,64581,64623,64639,91232,91236,106884), pooled evidence from these and many additional studies provide a benchmark for the place for N-acetyl cysteine in reducing the risk of contrast induced kidney damage in people with reduced kidney function.
Hyperhomocysteinemia. Oral N-acetyl cysteine seems to reduce homocysteine levels. Details: Taking N-acetyl cysteine orally seems to reduce homocysteine levels in patients with elevated homocysteine levels, including those with kidney failure requiring dialysis (2258,64542,64596).
Hyperlipidemia. Oral N-acetyl cysteine seems to reduce lipoprotein(a) levels. Details: Taking N-acetyl cysteine orally seems to modestly reduce lipoprotein(a) levels in patients with hyperlipidemia (2256,2257,64516).
Ifosfamide (Ifex) toxicity. Oral N-acetyl cysteine may be beneficial for reducing ifosfamide toxicity, although it does not appear to be as effective as mesna. Details: Taking N-acetyl cysteine orally seems to reduce ifosfamide-induced bladder toxicity (5808,10270,64730). However, mesna seems to be more effective for preventing ifosfamide toxicity than N-acetyl cysteine (10748).
Influenza. Oral N-acetyl cysteine may reduce the risk for symptomatic influenza. Details: One multi-center clinical trial conducted in Italy shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg twice daily for 6 months does not prevent influenza infection, but reduces the risk for clinically apparent disease by 68%, when compared with placebo (2260).
Kidney failure. Oral N-acetyl cysteine may reduce the risk for cardiovascular events in patients with kidney failure. Details: One clinical study in adults with kidney failure who have been on dialysis for at least 3 months shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg twice daily reduces the incidence of cardiovascular events, such as ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction, by about 40% when compared with placebo. There was no effect on total mortality or mortality from cardiovascular causes, although the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference in these outcomes (10430).
Myocardial infarction (MI). Intravenous N-acetyl cysteine, along with standard therapy, seems to improve outcomes in patients with MI. Oral N-acetyl cysteine has not been evaluated for this use. Details: Clinical research in adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation MI shows that administering N-acetyl cysteine with nitroglycerin as a continuous intravenous infusion for 48 hours reduces myocardial infarct size by 5.5%, doubles the extent of myocardial salvage, and shortens the time to chest pain resolution when compared with nitroglycerin plus placebo (97044). Additional preliminary clinical research shows that intravenous N-acetyl cysteine, when given with nitroglycerin and streptokinase in patients with evolving MI, may preserve left ventricular function and reduce oxidative stress (7872,64502,64778).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). Subcutaneous administration of N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to improve survival or disease progression in patients with ALS. Details: One clinical trial in patients with ALS shows that administering N-acetyl cysteine 50 mg/kg daily for 12 months via subcutaneous injection does not improve survival or slow disease progression when compared with placebo (2254).
Anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Oral N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to prevent or treat doxorubicin-induced cardiac toxicity. Details: Small clinical studies show that taking N-acetyl cysteine orally does not seem to prevent or reverse doxorubicin-induced cardiac toxicity when compared with placebo or a control group (2252,2253,64712).
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Intratracheal N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature infants. Details: Clinical research in premature infants shows that intratracheal N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to improve symptoms, hasten recovery of chronic lung disease, or reduce the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia when compared with placebo (64460,64490).
Cannabis use disorder. Oral N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to improve abstinence rates in patients with cannabis use disorder. Details: Most clinical research in adolescents and adults with cannabis use disorder shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 1200 mg twice daily for 8-12 weeks as an adjunct to counseling and other interventions does not reduce symptoms of depression or help with cannabis abstinence (99531,102663,102666,102668). Although a single study shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine more than doubles the odds of a negative urine cannabinoid test over an 8-week period in adolescents aged 15-21 when compared with placebo, there was no significant difference in the time to first negative urine cannabinoid test or end of treatment abstinence (102666).
Cystic fibrosis. Oral or inhaled N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to improve lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis. Details: Most clinical research shows that taking oral or nebulized N-acetyl cysteine does not significantly improve lung function or lung capacity in patients with cystic fibrosis when compared with a control (22735,64406,64671,64743). However, one preliminary clinical study shows that high-dose oral N-acetyl cysteine reduces the number and activity of airway neutrophils in these patients when compared with placebo (64510).
Erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP). Oral N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to improve photosensitivity in patients with EPP. Details: Small clinical studies show that taking N-acetyl cysteine 1800 mg daily orally for 4 weeks does not improve photosensitivity in patients with EPP when compared with placebo or baseline (64448,64756).
Helicobacter pylori. Adding oral N-acetyl cysteine to conventional Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication regimens does not seem to increase eradication rates. Details: Despite conflicting findings from individual, small clinical studies (64497,97042), meta-analyses of clinical research show that adding N-acetyl cysteine to a standard antibiotic eradication regimen does not improve eradication when compared with standard eradication therapy alone (99530,106901). N-acetyl cysteine has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. Preliminary clinical research shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg orally twice daily in combination with curcumin 30 mg, bovine lactoferrin 100 mg, and pantoprazole 20 mg, all taken twice daily for one week, without antibiotic therapy does not eradicate H. pylori infection, although it might improve dyspeptic symptoms and gastrointestinal inflammation (64559).
Hepatitis. Oral N-acetyl cysteine does not appear to improve treatment response in patients with hepatitis. However, when taken with interferon, it might lengthen the time to relapse. Details: Taking N-acetyl cysteine orally does not seem to benefit patients with acute viral hepatitis (64462). Also, adding N-acetyl cysteine to conventional interferon therapy does not seem to improve treatment response in patients with hepatitis C when compared with interferon therapy alone (64418,64799,64825). However, some clinical research shows that adding N-acetyl cysteine to interferon therapy delays relapse in hepatitis C patients when compared with interferon treatment alone (64424).
HIV/AIDS. Oral N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to increase CD4+ cell count in patients with HIV. Details: Small clinical studies show that taking N-acetyl cysteine 400 mg orally twice daily or 600 mg once daily for 4-6 months does not improve CD4+ cell counts or viral load in patients with HIV when compared with placebo (64482,64779). In addition, taking N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg orally three times daily in combination with sodium selenite 500 mcg daily for up to 24 weeks does not affect the percentage of CD4+ lymphocytes or viral load in HIV patients when compared with a control (64798).
Hypotension. Oral N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to improve renal outcomes in patients with prolonged hypotension. Details: One clinical trial in patients with prolonged hypotension shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine orally for 7 days does not reduce the risk of acute kidney failure when compared with placebo (64545).
Infertility. Oral N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to improve fertility in females with unexplained infertility. Details: One clinical trial in females with unexplained infertility shows that taking oral N-acetyl cysteine 1200 mg daily in addition to clomiphene citrate 50 mg twice daily for 5 days, beginning on the second day of the cycle, does not improve pregnancy rate or reduce miscarriage rate when compared with clomiphene citrate alone (64528).
Liver transplant. Intravenous N-acetyl cysteine during liver donor operation does not seem to improve liver transplant outcomes. Oral N-acetyl cysteine has not been evaluated for this use. Details: One clinical trial shows that administering N-acetyl cysteine intravenously during a liver donor operation and preserving the liver in cold solution containing N-acetyl cysteine does not reduce the risk of ischemia reperfusion injury or acute cellular rejection in liver transplant recipients when compared with control (64486).
Pancreatitis. Oral N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to prevent pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Additionally, intravenous N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to reduce the risk of organ dysfunction in patients being treated for severe acute pancreatitis. Details: Two clinical trials show that taking oral N-acetyl cysteine 1200 mg once before undergoing ERCP does not reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis when compared with placebo (64522,109939). One of these trials also evaluated oral N-acetyl cysteine in combination with rectal indomethacin, but the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis did not appear to be lower when compared with taking indomethacin alone. However, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between those groups (109939). In patients with severe acute pancreatitis, intravenous N-acetyl cysteine, in combination with selenium and vitamin C, also does not seem to reduce the risk of organ dysfunction (64551).
Postoperative recovery. Oral or intravenous N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to improve survival, prevent complications, or reduce length of hospital stay in patients undergoing cardiac or liver surgery. Details: N-acetyl cysteine, taken orally or intravenously, does not seem to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, kidney injury, or mortality or reduce the length of hospital stay following cardiac surgery (64610,64624,64628,64635,91233,91240). While some meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking N-acetyl cysteine orally or intravenously reduces the odds of postoperative atrial fibrillation by 36% to 44% when compared with placebo in patients undergoing cardiac surgery (64635,91233,91240), conflicting results exist (64624). In patients undergoing liver resection, intravenous N-acetyl cysteine does not reduce complication rate, risk of liver failure, length of hospital stay, or mortality when compared with a control group. In fact, patients receiving N-acetyl cysteine were more likely to experience delirium and its associated complications (99532).

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

Head and neck cancer. Oral N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to reduce mortality, improve event-free survival, or prevent additional tumors in patients with head and neck cancer. Details: Taking N-acetyl cysteine orally does not prevent second primary tumors in patients with head and neck cancer (1710). Also, N-acetyl cysteine alone, or in combination with retinyl palmitate, has no effect on mortality or event-free survival in these patients (1710).
Lung cancer. Oral N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to reduce mortality, improve event-free survival, or prevent additional tumors in patients with lung cancer. Details: Taking N-acetyl cysteine orally does not prevent second primary tumors in patients with lung cancer (1710). Also, N-acetyl cysteine alone, or in combination with retinyl palmitate, has no effect on mortality or event-free survival in these patients (1705,1710).
Multisystem organ failure. Administering intravenous N-acetyl cysteine might increase the risk of mortality due to multisystem organ failure. Oral N-acetyl cysteine has not been evaluated for this use. Details: Administering N-acetyl cysteine intravenously, greater than 24 hours after hospital admission, might increase mortality rate due to multisystem organ failure. The effect of N-acetyl cysteine given within 24 hours of hospital admission requires further study (7871).

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Research on the use of intravenous N-acetyl cysteine in patients with ARDS is conflicting. Oral N-acetyl cysteine has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: Some clinical research shows that N-acetyl cysteine might reduce mortality and improve oxygenation in patients with acute lung injury/ARDS when compared with a control (64619). These patients were administered intravenous N-acetyl cysteine 150 mg/kg on the first day followed by 50 mg/kg for 3 more days. However, other clinical research shows that administering intravenous N-acetyl cysteine 40 mg/kg daily for 3 days does not reduce the risk of ARDS development in patients with acute lung injury (64771). Also, some clinical research shows that intravenous N-acetyl cysteine for up to 6 days does not reduce the time for improvement in patients with ARDS (64492). These discrepancies may be due to variations in genes involved in glutathione-S-transferase (GST) expression (64619).
Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD). It is unclear if oral or intravenous N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial in patients with ALD. Details: A case series of three male children with this rare condition suggests that administering N-acetyl cysteine orally and intravenously might improve overall survival and stabilize neurologic status after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation when compared with historical controls (64547).
Aging. Oral N-acetyl cysteine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in older adults shows that taking a combination product containing N-acetyl cysteine 100 mg/kg, glycerine 100 mg/kg, and alanine 200 mg/kg orally daily for 16 weeks modestly improved waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, and some serum markers of oxidative stress, but not body-mass index or diastolic blood pressure, when compared with placebo (110624). It is unclear if this effect is due to N-acetyl cysteine, other ingredients, or the combination.
Alcohol-related liver disease. Although there has been interest in using oral N-acetyl cysteine for preventing alcohol-related liver damage, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of N-acetyl cysteine for this purpose.
Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there has been interest in using oral N-acetyl cysteine for allergic rhinitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of N-acetyl cysteine for this condition.
Altitude sickness. It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine can treat or prevent altitude sickness. Details: One very small clinical trial shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 400 mg daily does not reduce altitude-associated anorexia or improve food intake in individuals exposed to high altitudes when compared with either placebo or vitamin E 400 mg daily (64599).
Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial for Alzheimer disease. Details: One clinical trial in a small number of patients with Alzheimer disease shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 50 mg/kg daily for 6 months does not improve most cognitive symptoms of Alzheimer disease when compared with placebo (7870). However, preliminary clinical research in adults with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease also shows that taking a combination product containing N-acetyl cysteine 2.55 grams, L-serine 12.35 grams, nicotinamide riboside 1 gram, and L-carnitine tartrate 3.73 grams orally once daily for 28 days followed by twice daily for 56 more days improves cognitive functioning scores by 14% to 29% when compared with placebo (110623). It is unclear if this effect is due to N-acetyl cysteine, other ingredients, or the combination.
Aminoglycoside ototoxicity. Small clinical studies suggest that oral N-acetyl cysteine may modestly reduce the risk of ototoxicity caused by aminoglycoside therapy. Details: A meta-analysis of available clinical research in adults with kidney failure receiving aminoglycosides for bloodstream infections shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg twice daily for a total of 14 days, or for up to 7 days after completion of aminoglycoside therapy, reduces the risk of hearing loss by 33% when compared with placebo. The findings of this analysis are limited by the small sample sizes and high risk of bias of the included studies (97049).
Asthma. It is unclear if inhaling N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial in patients with asthma. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that, when administered as an aerosol daily for one week in combination with isoproterenol, N-acetyl cysteine 10% improves lung capacity and decreases sputum viscosity when compared with placebo in patients with asthma (64674).
Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine can improve athletic performance. Details: Some small clinical studies shows that N-acetyl cysteine might be beneficial if taken orally at a dose of 1200 mg daily for 9 days leading up to exercise or when administered intravenously both before and during exercise (64529,91248), but that it might not improve performance when taken as a single 20 mg/kg oral dose 60 minutes prior to exercise (102028).
Biliary disorders. It is unclear if intravenous N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial in patients with biliary disorders. Oral N-acetyl cysteine has not been evaluated for this use. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients undergoing surgical bypass for obstructive jaundice shows that postoperative intravenous N-acetyl cysteine for 48 hours reduces levels of some liver enzymes, but not bilirubin levels or mean hospital stay, when compared with a control group. Although all liver enzyme levels had not returned to normal by 30 days after surgery, they were more improved in the group using N-acetylcysteine (102654).
Bipolar disorder. The effects of oral N-acetyl cysteine in patients with bipolar disorder are conflicting. Oral N-acetyl cysteine might reduce symptoms of depression and increase remission rates, but it does not appear to be beneficial for reducing symptoms of mania or for maintaining remission. Details: One clinical study in patients with bipolar disorder shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 1000 mg twice daily as adjunct to usual therapy for 24 weeks reduces symptoms of depression when compared with placebo (64608). A subgroup analysis of patients from this study who were diagnosed with bipolar II disorder shows that this dose of N-acetyl cysteine can increase the number of patients who achieve remission of both depression and mania, but not the number achieving remission of only one of these, when compared with placebo (91243). However, other research shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 3 grams daily in addition to standard therapy for 20 weeks does not improve depression when compared with placebo in patients with bipolar depression experiencing a depressive episode for at least 4 weeks. A limitation of this study is the high (56%) placebo response rate, which might have limited the ability to detect between-group differences in symptoms improvements (99529). Taking N-acetyl cysteine as an adjunct to usual therapy does not appear to be beneficial for maintaining remission. A clinical study in patients with bipolar disorder shows that, although taking N-acetyl cysteine 1000 mg twice daily for 8 weeks improves symptoms of bipolar disorder when compared to baseline, maintenance therapy with N-acetyl cysteine for an additional 6 months does not improve depression symptoms or prevent recurrence when compared with placebo (91234).
Bronchiectasis. Oral N-acetyl cysteine has been evaluated in patients with bronchiectasis, with promising results. Details: Preliminary clinical research in Chinese adults with bronchiectasis shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg twice daily for 12 months reduces the risk of exacerbation by 59% when compared with a control group receiving on-demand treatment only. For every eight patients treated with N-acetyl cysteine, one additional patient was free of exacerbations at 12 months when compared with on-demand treatment only (102027).
Canker sores. It is unclear if rinsing the mouth with N-acetyl cysteine solution is beneficial in patients with canker sores. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with recurrent canker sores shows that rinsing the mouth with N-acetyl cysteine (ACC, HEXAL AG) 200 mg dissolved in water for 30 seconds is no more effective than 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate for canker sore healing time or level of pain. However, pain was reduced by 50% to 90% more over baseline 2-4 days after use of N-acetyl cysteine when compared with 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate (102659).
Chemotherapy-induced hepatotoxicity. It is unclear if intravenous N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial in patients with chemotherapy-induced hepatotoxicity. Oral N-acetyl cysteine has not been evaluated for this use. Details: Some observational research in children aged 2-17 years with chemotherapy-induced hepatotoxicity has found that intravenous N-acetyl cysteine 3 mcg/kg over 24 hours is associated with day-to-day improvement in liver injury, based on liver function enzyme levels, when compared with no N-acetyl cysteine therapy. Decreases in liver enzymes also occurred earlier in patients using N-acetyl cysteine (102664).
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Small clinical studies suggest that oral N-acetyl cysteine may reduce the risk for peripheral neuropathy in patients receiving oxaliplatin. Details: One preliminary clinical study in patients with colon cancer shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 1200 mg orally at 1.5 hours prior to oxaliplatin therapy reduces the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy when compared with placebo (64505). Another small clinical trial in patients with gastric or colorectal cancers shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine (Osveh Pharmaceutical Company) 1200 mg one hour before receiving oxaliplatin during eight courses of chemotherapy reduces the incidence and severity of neurotoxicity symptoms when compared with placebo. In patients taking N-acetyl cysteine, 31% had no signs of neurotoxicity after oxaliplatin chemotherapy, compared with 0% of those taking placebo. Also, 44% had mild symptoms, compared with 6% of those taking placebo. However, there were no significant differences in electrophysiological sensory results (102665).
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there has been interest in using oral N-acetyl cysteine for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of N-acetyl cysteine for this purpose.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD). Oral N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to improve kidney function in patients with CKD or reduce the risk of kidney injury or other complications after cardiac surgery in patients with CKD. However, intravenous N-acetyl cysteine might offer some benefit in patients with CKD undergoing cardiac surgery. Details: Clinical research shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 1200 mg orally daily in combination with standard antihypertensive drugs does not reduce proteinuria or other markers of kidney injury in patients with CKD (64627). N-acetyl cysteine has also been evaluated for the prevention of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery in patients with CKD, with conflicting results. Several meta-analyses have shown that N-acetyl cysteine does not reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury, postoperative complications, postoperative interventions, length of hospitalization, or mortality after cardiac surgery in adults with CKD (95766,95767,95768). However, these meta-analyses found that intravenous, but not oral, N-acetyl cysteine might be beneficial (95767,95768). A more recent meta-analysis shows that intravenous N-acetyl cysteine reduces the risk of postoperative acute kidney injury by 23% and reduces the risk of cardiac adverse events by 17% (99533). However, most of the studies included in this latter meta-analysis were small and the definition of cardiac events varied among the included studies. Higher quality research is needed to determine the benefit, if any, of N-acetyl cysteine in reducing acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery in patients with CKD.
Cocaine dependence. It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine is effective for reducing cravings or withdrawal symptoms in people trying to stop cocaine use. Details: Some preliminary clinical research shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg twice daily for 2 days reduces the desire to use cocaine when compared with placebo in individuals with cocaine dependence (64563). However, other preliminary clinical research shows that taking oral N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg twice daily for 2 days does not reduce cravings or withdrawal symptoms when compared with placebo in patients hospitalized for cocaine dependency (64504).
Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine is effective for preventing colorectal cancer. Details: Clinical research in a small group of patients with a history of adenomatous colonic polyps shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 800 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces the proliferative index of colonic crypts, suggesting that N-acetyl cysteine might decrease the likelihood of colorectal cancer (7873).
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. It is unclear if oral or intravenous N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial in patients undergoing CABG surgery. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 300 mg orally in addition to intermittent blood cardioplegia does not affect postoperative outcomes or the risk of mortality when compared with control in patients undergoing elective CABG surgery (64638). Another small clinical study shows that giving N-acetyl cysteine 100 mg/kg by intravenous infusion, for two doses during CABG surgery and one postoperative dose, seems to reduce serum creatinine levels at 4 and 48 hours after surgery and reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury when compared with placebo. However, serum creatinine levels were within the normal range in all patients (106886).
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Small clinical trials suggest that intravenous N-acetyl cysteine is not beneficial in patients at risk for respiratory failure from severe COVID-19. It is unclear if oral use is beneficial. Details: A small single-center clinical trial of patients presenting to the emergency room with COVID-19 pneumonia in Brazil shows that receiving intravenous N-acetyl cysteine 21 grams in dextrose 5% over 20 hours in conjunction with institutional standard care, including empiric antibiotics, does not reduce the need for mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, or mortality when compared with dextrose 5% (105560). Another small single-center clinical trial in patients with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in Iran shows that receiving a continuous intravenous infusion of N-acetyl cysteine 40 mg/kg in dextrose 5% daily for 3 days in conjunction with institutional standard care, including corticosteroids, vitamin C, vitamin D, and zinc, also does not reduce the need for mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, or mortality when compared with dextrose 5% (105561). Similarly, a retrospective study of patients hospitalized in Italy for COVID-19 pneumonia shows that receiving intravenous N-acetyl cysteine 300 mg three times daily, switched to 600 mg twice daily if the patient was clinically stable, for a duration of least 5 days, does not improve inpatient mortality, ICU admission, length of ICU stay, or the incidence of atelectasis, when compared with no supplementation. At a 6-month follow-up, treatment with N-acetyl cysteine also did not appear to impact long-term outcomes in these patients (108449). In contrast, a small, retrospective study in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia shows that taking oral N-acetyl cysteine, 600 mg twice daily for 10 days in addition to standard care, including empiric antibiotics, corticosteroids, and remdesivir, reduces the risk for severe respiratory failure requiring ventilator support and reduces mortality at 14 days in those with severe pneumonia when compared with standard care alone (106885). Prospective, randomized, double-blind trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Dental plaque. It is unclear if mouthwash solutions containing N-acetyl cysteine can reduce dental plaque; higher concentrations may be more effective than lower concentrations. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that using a mouthwash solution containing N-acetyl cysteine 10% four times daily for 7 days reduces dental plaque (64687). However, other clinical research shows that rinsing twice daily for 3 weeks with N-acetyl cysteine 1.25% does not reduce the development of plaque. In addition, N-acetyl cysteine 1.25% was not beneficial when used for 2 weeks as a treatment for experimental plaque (102662).
Dry eye. Small clinical studies suggest that eye drops containing N-acetyl cysteine, with or without chitosan, might improve objective measures of dry eye. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with dry eye shows that using tear solution containing 20% N-acetyl cysteine every two hours for 2 months improves objective, but not subjective, symptoms of dry eye syndrome when compared with artificial tears (64705). A small clinical study in patients with moderate to severe dry eye disease shows that applying a specific product (Lacrimera) containing chitosan-N-acetyl cysteine as one drop once or twice daily improves tear film thickness (TFT) after 10 minutes of application, and is maintained for 24 hours, when compared with placebo. Once or twice daily application does not seem to alter the level of benefit (97710). It is unclear if the benefit of this combination product is due to N-acetyl cysteine, chitosan, or the combination.
Endometriosis. Oral N-acetyl cysteine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with endometriosis-associated pelvic pain shows that taking a combination product containing N-acetyl cysteine 1200 mg, alpha lipoic acid 400 mg, bromelain 50 mg, and zinc 20 mg daily for 6 months improves pain and reduces analgesic intake when compared to baseline (99535). This study was limited by a lack of comparator group.
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). It is unclear if N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) can improve visualization when used as a premedication for EGD. Details: Clinical research shows that giving NAC orally, 600 mg in 90 mL of an emulsion formulation, 20 minutes prior to EGD reduces foaming and mucus, allowing better visualization of the mucosa. The percentage of patients with no bubbles affecting visualization is about 51% with NAC, compared with 34% with placebo. The percentage not requiring suction or endoscopic flushes is 50% with NAC and 27% with placebo. Giving simethicone 150 mg in combination with NAC further improves visualization (108941).
Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine is effective for preventing or treating exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: One small clinical study shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 20 mg/kg daily in three divided doses after muscle-damaging exercise does not improve muscle repair or inflammatory response in healthy patients taking part in a specific resistance training program (91244).
Fibrocystic breast disease. It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine is effective for fibrocystic beast disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adult females with fibrocystic breast disease and cyclical mastalgia shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine (Osvah Pharmaceutical Company) 600 mg orally once daily for 12 weeks modestly improves pain scores when compared with placebo (109938).
Gingivitis. It is unclear if mouthwash containing N-acetyl cysteine is effective for the prevention or treatment of gingivitis. Details: Clinical research shows that rinsing twice daily for 3 weeks with N-acetyl cysteine 1.25% is slightly more effective than placebo for reducing the development of gingivitis. However, there was no effect on plaque. In addition, N-acetyl cysteine is not as effective as chlorhexidine 0.2% and had no benefit when used for 2 weeks as a treatment for experimental gingivitis (102662).
Hangover. Although there has been interest in using oral N-acetyl cysteine for treating hangovers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of N-acetyl cysteine for this purpose.
Hearing loss. It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine is effective for preventing or treating hearing loss. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical trials in adults shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 900-2700 mg orally daily for up to 42 days modestly protects against noise-induced hearing loss in middle to high hearing thresholds (0 to 4 kHz and 0 to 6 kHz), but not low hearing thresholds (0 to 2 kHz), when compared with control. However, the validity of this study is limited by high heterogeneity (109937). Another meta-analysis of 2 clinical trials in adults with sudden hearing loss shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 1200 mg orally daily for 2 weeks to 3 months moderately improves pure tone threshold hearing when compared with control (109940).
Hepatorenal syndrome. It is unclear if intravenous N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial in patients with hepatorenal syndrome. Oral N-acetyl cysteine has not been evaluated for this use. Details: A case series of 12 patients with hepatorenal syndrome reported that intravenous N-acetyl cysteine, starting with a 150 mg/kg loading dose over 2 hours, followed by a continuous infusion of 100 mg/kg daily for 5 days, modestly improved kidney function, but not liver function or blood pressure. When compared with historical controls, N-acetyl cysteine administration was also associated with an improvement in total survival time (1752). Prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial in patients with HHT. Details: One small clinical study shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg three times daily orally for 12 weeks decreases the frequency and severity of daytime nosebleeds, but not nighttime nosebleeds, when compared to baseline in individuals with HHT (64643). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. It is unclear if oral or inhaled N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial for the management of various forms of interstitial pneumonia. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg three times daily for 12 weeks seems to improve pulmonary function tests and decrease biochemical markers of disease when compared with baseline (7868). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a specific type of interstitial pneumonia, shows that oral or inhaled N-acetyl cysteine does not reduce the risk of acute exacerbations or attenuate decline of lung function as measured by forced vital capacity (FVC), when compared with placebo (99538).
Lead toxicity. Although there has been interest in using oral N-acetyl cysteine for lead toxicity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of N-acetyl cysteine for this purpose.
Malaria. It is unclear if intravenous N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial as an adjunct in treating malaria. Oral N-acetyl cysteine has not been evaluated for this use. Details: One small clinical study shows that intravenous N-acetyl cysteine, in combination with intravenous artesunate, does not reduce symptoms or the risk of mortality in patients with severe malaria when compared with artesunate alone (64630).
Male infertility. It is unclear of oral N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial for male infertility. Details: Clinical research in adults with idiopathic oligoasthenoteratospermia shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg orally daily for 26 weeks improves sperm concentration, but not sperm motility, when compared with placebo (64626). Additionally, a preliminary clinical study in adults with asthenoteratozoospermia shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg daily for 3 months improves sperm motility and concentration, increases protamine, and improves hormone levels and sperm morphology when compared to baseline (99534). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group. There is also interest in using N-acetyl cysteine to attenuate the infertility effects observed after COVID-19 infection. A large clinical study in males who had normal sperm analysis prior to COVID-19, but with significantly lower sperm parameters within 6 weeks after infection, shows that taking oral N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg daily for 3 months improves sperm volume, concentration, morphology, and total motility when compared with baseline post-COVID-19 levels (108447). Although the study enrolled a control group, the investigators did not provide a statistical comparison of outcomes between groups, limiting the validity of this finding.
Mercury toxicity. Although there has been interest in using oral N-acetyl cysteine for mercury toxicity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of N-acetyl cysteine for this purpose.
Miscarriage. Oral N-acetyl cysteine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its benefit when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical trial shows that taking oral N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg daily with folic acid 500 mcg daily improves the likelihood of maintaining pregnancy past 20 weeks when compared with folic acid alone in adults with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (64616).
Multiple sclerosis (MS). It is unclear if oral and intravenous N-acetyl cysteine are beneficial in patients with MS. Details: One clinical trial in a small group of patients with MS shows that intravenous and oral N-acetyl cysteine in addition to standard care for 2 months improves self-reported cognition by a moderate amount when compared with standard care alone. Self-reported attention also seems to improve (102657).
Nitrate tolerance. Intravenous N-acetyl cysteine seems to reduce the development of nitrate tolerance. Oral N-acetyl cysteine has shown mixed results for this use. Details: Some clinical research shows that concurrent intravenous or oral administration of N-acetyl cysteine reduces the development of nitroglycerin tolerance (832,2245,64546). However, other research suggests that oral N-acetyl cysteine does not reduce the development of nitroglycerin tolerance in patients with angina (2281,2282).
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial in patients with NASH. Details: One small clinical study in patients with NASH shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 1.2 grams with metformin 850-1500 mg daily for 48 weeks reduces NASH activity scores and measures of steatosis and hepatocellular ballooning, but not inflammation or fibrosis, when compared to baseline. However, taking the same dose of N-acetyl cysteine and metformin along with ursodeoxycholic acid 15 mg/kg daily does not improve these outcomes, or improve liver enzyme levels, when compared with baseline (102026). The reasons for these disparate findings are unclear. Inadequate statistical power and the lack of a comparator group limit the validity of these findings.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Oral N-acetyl cysteine might improve some symptoms of OCD when used with fluvoxamine in adults. Its effects when used in combination with other psychiatric medications or as monotherapy in children and adults is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 1000 mg twice daily along with fluvoxamine 200 mg daily for 10 weeks modestly reduces overall symptoms of OCD and symptoms of obsession when compared with fluvoxamine alone. However, the addition of N-acetyl cysteine is not associated with an improvement in symptoms of compulsion, nor with a statistically significant increase in partial or complete responders, when compared with fluvoxamine alone (97048). A clinical trial in adults with OCD who are taking various psychiatric medications shows that adding oral N-acetyl cysteine 2000-4000 mg daily for 20 weeks does not reduce symptoms of OCD, or improve secondary outcomes such as anxiety, mood, functioning, or quality of life, when compared with placebo (108450). Over half (63%) of patients had a comorbid psychiatric diagnosis, limiting the applicability of these findings. Other preliminary clinical research in adults with moderate to severe OCD who are taking various psychiatric medications shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 3000 mg daily for 16 weeks does not improve OCD symptoms when compared with placebo (97045). A very small preliminary clinical trial in children aged 8-17 years, most of whom are not taking psychiatric medications, shows some benefit for symptom reduction when N-acetyl cysteine 2700 mg daily for 12 weeks is compared with placebo (102656).
Otitis media. Although there has been interest in using ear drops containing N-acetyl cysteine for otitis media, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of N-acetyl cysteine for this purpose.
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Oral N-acetyl cysteine might improve pregnancy-related outcomes in PCOS, although it appears to be less effective than metformin. Evidence on its benefits for other symptoms of PCOS is conflicting. Details: Some research in patients with PCOS shows that N-acetyl cysteine can increase insulin sensitivity, improve hirsutism, and improve menstrual irregularity (64435,64550,91245,102121). It may also improve fasting insulin levels, but results are conflicting (64435,64550,91245). Other research shows that N-acetyl cysteine, alone or as a specific combination product (Ovaric HP, Just Pharma), increases ovulation rates in some, but not all, patients with PCOS (64480,64550,64553,91246,91247,102121). A meta-analysis of clinical research suggests that N-acetyl cysteine increases the odds of having a live birth, getting pregnant, and/or ovulating by about 3-fold when compared with placebo. Its effects on the odds of pregnancy and ovulation appear to be greater in those resistant to clomiphene citrate. However, when compared with metformin, N-acetyl cysteine appears to decrease the odds of getting pregnant by about 60% and decrease the odds of ovulation by about 87%. N-acetyl cysteine also does not appear to reduce the rate of miscarriage, menstrual irregularity, or the severity of acne or hirsutism in people with PCOS (93057). Another meta-analysis shows that N-acetyl cysteine in various doses is associated with an insignificant improvement in ovulation and pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and miscarriage rate, and is less efficacious than metformin for all of these outcomes (106888).
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial in veterans with PTSD. Details: A small clinical study in veterans with PTSD and a history of substance use disorders shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 1200 mg orally twice daily for 8 weeks while receiving cognitive behavioral therapy reduces depressive symptoms and the rate of self-reported PTSD symptoms when compared with cognitive behavioral therapy plus placebo. Additionally, receiving N-acetyl cysteine reduces the amount and frequency of cravings by 81% and 72%, respectively, compared to a reduction of 32% and 29% for those receiving cognitive behavioral therapy with placebo. The use of N-acetyl cysteine did not impact the intensity of cravings or the actual rate of substance use during the study, which was low for all patients (97037).
Postmenopausal conditions. It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial for preventing postmenopausal bone loss. Details: One small clinical trial shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 2 grams daily for 3 months does not reduce postmenopausal bone loss when compared with placebo (64576).
Preterm labor. It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial for reducing the risk for preterm labor. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 0.6 grams daily orally in combination with 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHPC), beginning at 16 to 18 weeks gestation and continuing until active labor, increases the likelihood of reaching 36 weeks gestation and increases gestational age at delivery in adults with previous preterm labor and bacterial vaginosis when compared with 17-OHPC alone (64615). However, taking oral N-acetyl cysteine 0.6 grams every 8 hours, beginning at 25 to 33 weeks gestation and continuing until delivery, does not improve the treatment-to-delivery interval when compared with placebo in adults with early onset severe pre-eclampsia and/or HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) syndrome (64493).
Radiation-induced sialadenitis. It is unclear if mouthwash containing N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial for reducing dry mouth during chemoradiotherapy. Details: One clinical trial in a small group of patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer shows that using a mouth rinse containing N-acetyl cysteine 500 mg five times daily during radiotherapy and 2 weeks postradiotherapy improves daytime and total sticky saliva and feelings of dry mouth by up to 38% when compared with placebo. However, N-acetyl cysteine does not seem to improve nighttime symptoms (102661).
Schizophrenia. Oral N-acetyl cysteine seems to improve negative symptoms of schizophrenia. The benefits of N-acetyl cysteine on positive symptoms of schizophrenia are less clear. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine for at least 6 months has a small to moderate effect on negative symptoms when compared with placebo. However, taking N-acetyl cysteine for only 8 weeks does not reduce negative symptoms, suggesting that a longer duration of treatment may be necessary (102658). Individual clinical studies show that N-acetyl cysteine does not improve positive symptoms, social function, cognition, and clinical global impression when compared with placebo (64605,99528). However, a meta-analysis of available research shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine for any duration has a small effect on positive symptoms, a moderate effect on working memory, and a large effect on overall symptoms (102658). It is possible that many individual studies were underpowered to detect a difference.
Sepsis. Small clinical studies suggest that intravenous N-acetyl cysteine may improve respiratory function and tissue oxygenation, but not mortality, in patients with septic shock. Details: Two small clinical studies show that intravenous N-acetyl cysteine might improve respiratory function and tissue oxygenation, but not mortality, in some patients with recently diagnosed septic shock when compared with placebo (64760,64797).
Sjogren syndrome. Small clinical studies suggest that oral N-acetyl cysteine may improve ocular and oral manifestations of this condition. Details: Two small clinical studies in adults with Sjogren syndrome show that taking oral N-acetyl cysteine 200 mg three times daily for 4 weeks reduces eye soreness and irritability, bad breath, and daytime thirst when compared with a control group; however, objective signs of dry eye were not improved (64673,64812).
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial in patients with SLE. Details: One small clinical trial shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine orally 2.4-4.8 grams daily for 3 months significantly reduces disease activity and fatigue when compared with placebo in patients with SLE (91242).
Thrombocytopenia. Oral N-acetyl cysteine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients, its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia resistant or refractory to steroid therapy shows taking N-acetyl cysteine 400 mg every 8 hours with atorvastatin daily for at least one month at least doubles platelet count or increases it above 30 × 109/L compared to baseline in 60% of participants. However, 40% of participants did not respond to treatment (111572). It is unclear if this effect is due to N-acetyl cysteine, atorvastatin, or the combination. The validity of these findings is limited by the very small sample size, insufficient randomization, lack of a comparator group, and low retention rate, especially in the non-responder group.
Tourette syndrome. It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial in patients with this condition. Details: One small clinical trial in children 8-17 years of age with Tourette syndrome shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by 1200 mg twice daily for the next 10 weeks, does not improve tic symptoms, premonitory urges, or the comorbid symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety, or depression when compared with placebo (97040).
Trichotillomania. Oral N-acetyl cysteine might offer some benefit to adults, but not children, with trichotillomania. Details: One small clinical trial in adults shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine orally, in doses up to 2400 mg daily, significantly decreases the urge to pull hair, the amount of hair pulled, and patients' perception of their control over hair pulling as measured by a self-rating scale. After 12 weeks of treatment, scores decreased by 40% (16840). However, in children, taking N-acetyl cysteine in doses up to 2400 mg daily for 12 weeks does not seem to improve hair pulling when compared with placebo (91235).
Ulcerative colitis. It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial in patients with ulcerative colitis. Details: One small clinical trial shows that oral N-acetyl cysteine 0.8 grams daily in combination with mesalamine 2.4 grams daily for 4 weeks does not improve the rate of clinical remission in individuals with ulcerative colitis when compared with mesalamine alone (64606).
Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Oral N-acetyl cysteine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Observational research in female breast cancer survivors has found that taking the combination of D-mannose 500 mg, N-acetyl cysteine 100 mg, and Morinda citrifolia fruit extract 200 mg daily for 2 months in addition to antibiotic therapy is associated with reduced recurrence of UTIs and urinary discomfort when compared with antibiotics alone (97360).
Uterine fibroids. It is unclear if oral N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial in patients with uterine fibroids. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces the volume of uterine fibroids by about 25%, compared with a reduction of about 1% with placebo. N-acetyl cysteine also reduces painful and heavy menstrual bleeding when compared with placebo (106889).
Wound healing. It is unclear if postoperative intravenous N-acetyl cysteine is beneficial in patients undergoing lower extremity amputation. Details: A clinical study in patients undergoing lower extremity amputation due to critical limb-threatening ischemia shows that receiving postoperative intravenous N-acetyl cysteine 1200 mg twice daily for 5 days, beginning within 3 hours after surgery, improves tissue perfusion from days 3 to 5 and amputation stump healing at day 30 in patients that are defined as high-risk, but not in the intent-to-treat population, when compared with placebo (108448). The validity of these findings is limited due to the short duration of treatment and the inclusion of both above-the-knee and below-the-knee amputations. More evidence is needed to rate N-acetyl cysteine for these uses.

EFFECTIVE

Familial hypophosphatemia. Oral vitamin D in combination with phosphate is effective for bone disorders in patients with familial hypophosphatemia. Details: Taking calcitriol or dihydrotachysterol orally in combination with phosphate supplements is effective for treating bone disorders in people with familial hypophosphatemia (11818).
Hypoparathyroidism. Oral vitamin D increases serum calcium concentrations in people with hypoparathyroidism or pseudohypoparathyroidism. Details: Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) is effective in high doses for increasing serum calcium concentrations in people with hypoparathyroidism or pseudohypoparathyroidism (11820). Also, taking vitamin D (form unspecified) or calcitriol postoperatively is effective for preventing hypocalcemia in people with hypoparathyroidism due to thyroidectomy (39045).
Osteomalacia. Oral vitamin D is effective for osteomalacia. Details: Oral calcifediol is effective for treating osteomalacia secondary to liver disease (hepatic osteodystrophy) and anticonvulsant-induced osteomalacia. Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) is effective for osteomalacia due to malabsorption syndromes, Fanconi syndrome, and corticosteroid-induced osteomalacia (11819,11821).
Renal osteodystrophy. Oral calcitriol prevents renal osteodystrophy in patients with chronic renal failure. Details: Taking calcitriol orally manages hypocalcemia and prevents renal osteodystrophy in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing dialysis (11823).
Rickets. Oral vitamin D prevents and treats rickets. Details: Vitamin D is effective for preventing and treating rickets, a consequence of vitamin D deficiency. Calcitriol should be used in patients with renal failure (11824).
Vitamin D deficiency. Oral vitamin D prevents and treats vitamin D deficiency. Details: Vitamin D is effective for preventing and treating vitamin D deficiency using a wide range of doses (7555,16888,16891,17476). Optimal blood levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for maintaining bone density is controversial; however, it is typically estimated that blood levels of 20-100 ng/mL are needed. Toxicity usually does not occur until levels exceed 150 ng/mL (17476,93945). Vitamin D also alleviates symptoms and syndromes associated with vitamin D deficiency. Administering vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) intramuscularly or orally seems to help treat severe proximal myopathy associated with severe vitamin D deficiency. Several case reports suggest vitamin D therapy can provide prompt relief of muscle weakness and restore mobility (11923,84348,84687).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral vitamin D prevents corticosteroid-induced osteopenia and osteoporosis. Details: Taking calcifediol, cholecalciferol, calcitriol, or alfacalcidol orally prevents corticosteroid-induced osteopenia and osteoporosis (7555,83933). Vitamin D3 metabolites, including calcitriol and alfacalcidol, seem to be more effective at preventing bone loss compared to cholecalciferol in these patients, although the vitamin D3 metabolites seem to be inferior to bisphosphonates (83955). Furthermore, taking activated vitamin D or other forms of vitamin D alone or along with calcium improves bone mineral density in people with corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (38493,38581).
Osteoporosis. Adequate intake of vitamin D in conjunction with adequate calcium intake helps to prevent the progression of osteoporosis. It might also reduce the risk of a first fracture in some patients. However, its place in the prevention of secondary facture is unclear. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate vitamin D intake of 800-1000 IU daily along with adequate calcium intake for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake, with a target serum vitamin D level of 30 ng/mL (109425). In the US, foods that contain at least 120 IU vitamin D can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate vitamin D intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (97001). However, vitamin D supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Clinical research shows that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) and calcium can decrease postmenopausal bone loss, help prevent osteoporosis, and decrease the risk of fractures (10932,12926,12930,12934,12952) (38973,39015,39026,84003). According to one analysis, taking oral vitamin D3 700-800 IU daily with or without calcium reduces fracture risk in ambulatory and institutionalized elderly people (12933). Other analyses suggest that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol, ergocalciferol, calcifediol, calcitriol, or alfacalcidol with or without calcium can reduce the risk of all fractures by up to 17%, nonvertebral fractures by up to 49%, and hip fractures by up to 30% in older adults. However, the incidence of vertebral fractures does not appear to be reduced with vitamin D supplementation (38942,38970,38973,39015,39026,84660,109053). Despite the majority of research showing benefit, some studies have not found a positive effect of vitamin D on fracture risk. Some analyses of clinical evidence, including patients with and without osteoporosis, show that taking vitamin D3 or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) alone does not reduce fracture risk, suggesting that adequate calcium intake is needed for any benefit to be realized (39015,84471). Also, some evidence suggests that vitamin D3 400 IU daily is not effective for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in elderly nursing home residents (109053). Another clinical trial found that taking vitamin D3 800 IU daily with calcium 1200-1500 mg daily for 2 years does not increase bone mineral density (BMD) in Black postmenopausal adults. This may be due to the fact that Black females have a lower rate of bone remodeling, an increased calcium absorption efficiency, and reduced calcium excretion when compared with other ethnic groups; therefore, supplementation with vitamin D3 and calcium might not be as beneficial in these patients (16878). There is concern that vitamin D might not be effective for secondary prevention of fractures in elderly patients. A meta-analysis of clinical studies, including many studies cited above, and a large clinical study in elderly adults with a previous osteoporotic fracture show that taking vitamin D3 400-4000 IU daily or as a single dose up to 500,000 IU orally or injected annually with or without calcium 480-1200 mg daily for up to 5 years does not reduce the risk of hip, vertebral, or other fractures when compared with placebo or no treatment (13073,112486). Another study also shows that taking vitamin D3 800 IU and calcium 1000 mg daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (under 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). However, these studies have been criticized for failing to measure vitamin D levels and low adherence to study protocol (12931). Also, one of these studies did not use a placebo control (12929). Taking alfacalcidol orally seems to maintain BMD in prostatic carcinoma patients at risk for osteoporosis when treated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-a). Alfacalcidol maintains, but does not increase, BMD in these patients (6360).
Psoriasis. Topical vitamin D or vitamin D analogues improve symptoms of psoriasis. This benefit is not seen with oral vitamin D. Details: Topical application of vitamin D in the form of calcitriol or other vitamin D analogues, such as calcipotriene, maxacalcitol, and paricalcitol, effectively treats plaque psoriasis in some patients, including those with chronic plaque psoriasis (11822,84325). Applying topical vitamin D or its analogues in combination with topical corticosteroids such as betamethasone seems to be more effective for treating plaque psoriasis than either agent used alone (22283,82572,84325,84536,84647). Despite evidence that patients with psoriasis have low baseline serum levels of vitamin D, taking oral vitamin D does not seem to prevent psoriasis, improve symptoms, or reduce the severity of psoriasis in general (11822,22283,82572,84325,84536,84647,98193,108426,112481,112482). An analysis of a large clinical study in older adults with mild psoriasis shows that taking a vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) loading dose of 200,000 IU followed by vitamin D3 100,000 IU monthly for 1 year does not affect the severity or spread of psoriasis when compared with placebo (98193).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Some research suggests that oral vitamin D reduces symptoms of allergic rhinitis in children and adults. It is unclear if oral vitamin D during pregnancy is beneficial for the prevention of allergic rhinitis in the child. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with allergic rhinitis and vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks along with cetirizine improves overall symptom severity when compared with placebo and cetirizine. This improvement was not significant at 4 weeks, suggesting that symptom improvement might not occur until vitamin D has been adequately replenished (102120). Another moderate-sized clinical study conducted in China in adults with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis and vitamin D levels at the low end of the normal range shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily for 4 weeks along with mometasone nasal spray improves runny nose, itchy nose, and nasal congestion but does not reduce sneezing when compared with placebo and mometasone (112483). In children aged 5-15 years, 4 small- or moderate-sized clinical trials show that taking vitamin D 800 IU or 1000 IU daily for 1-6 months modestly reduces symptoms such as nasal congestion and rhinorrhea when compared with placebo or no supplementation (109728). It is unclear whether these children had vitamin D deficiency at baseline. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy has also been evaluated. A meta-analysis of three large clinical studies shows that prenatal vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of the child developing allergic rhinitis when compared with low-dose vitamin D, placebo, or no intervention (108438).
Dental caries. Some research suggests that oral vitamin D reduces the risk of dental caries in children. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research suggests that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) reduces the risk of cavities by 49%, and vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) reduces the risk by 36% when compared with placebo in infants, children, and adolescents (84690). The validity of this finding is limited by the heterogeneity of the included trials. Also, clinical research shows an inverse correlation between cord blood vitamin D status and the number of decayed primary teeth in the infant at 12 months of age (104620). However, this same research shows that taking two oral prenatal doses of vitamin D2 50,000 IU during pregnancy does not prevent dental caries in the infant at 12 months of age or increase vitamin D levels in the cord blood (104620).
Heart failure. Limited research suggests that oral vitamin D reduces the risk of developing heart failure in some patients. However, vitamin D does not seem to improve outcomes in patients that have already developed heart failure. Details: Population research has found that vitamin D levels below 15 ng/mL are associated with increased risk of developing heart failure (16615). A meta-analysis of 17 trials, including the landmark Randomized Evaluation of Calcium Or vitamin D (RECORD) trial, shows that vitamin D reduces the risk of heart failure by 21% compared to not taking vitamin D in patients 60 years or older (91343). This finding is limited because none of the included trials were designed to determine effects on cardiovascular outcomes. In contrast, a secondary analysis of data from the Women's Health Initiative trial shows that taking vitamin D 400 IU with calcium 1000 mg daily is not associated with a reduced risk of heart failure in postmenopausal adults. However, a subgroup analysis of that trial shows that taking vitamin D plus calcium is associated with a 37% lower risk of developing heart failure in postmenopausal adults classified as low-risk for heart failure at baseline. It is speculated that high-risk patients might not benefit from vitamin D plus calcium due to negative interactions with medications used to manage cardiovascular risk factors in this group (97307). While vitamin D might be associated with a reduced risk of developing heart failure, most evidence suggests that vitamin D is not beneficial in patients already diagnosed with heart failure. In one small clinical trial, taking vitamin D3 50,000 IU weekly along with calcium citrate 800 mg daily for 6 months was not associated with an improvement in 6-minute walk test, timed get up and go test (TGUG), electrocardiographic variables, or health status when compared with placebo in adults with heart failure; mortality was not evaluated (97299,97300). In another clinical trial, taking vitamin D3 2000 IU daily did not decrease the risk of mortality when compared with placebo in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2 heart failure patients (16620).
Hyperparathyroidism-related bone loss. Limited evidence suggests that oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with this condition. Details: Taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) orally seems to help decrease secondary hyperparathyroidism and bone turnover in females. In one study, supplementation with vitamin D3 increased serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, reduced levels of parathyroid hormone, and decreased production of markers of bone turnover (3463).
Respiratory tract infections. Oral vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk for respiratory tract infections in children. However, this benefit is not seen with the use of prenatal vitamin D supplements, or in adults taking vitamin D. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the treatment of respiratory tract infections. Details: Prenatally, increased levels of vitamin D during pregnancy have been associated with a lower incidence of childhood respiratory tract infections (98197). However, two meta-analyses of small clinical studies and one meta-analysis of large clinical studies show no effect of prenatal vitamin D supplementation on the incidence of infant or childhood respiratory tract infections, including lower respiratory tract infections, when compared with control. Results related to risk of wheeze are conflicting (95910,95912,108438). In children, most research shows that vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of respiratory infections. A meta-analysis of clinical trials in children aged 1-16 years shows that taking vitamin D decreases the odds of having a respiratory tract infection by about 29% when compared with control, although this study also identified a high likelihood of publication bias (105721). Daily or weekly vitamin D doses seem to be more beneficial than single bolus doses, although the largest meta-analysis failed to confirm this result (84689,93766,105721). One clinical study in preterm Black infants shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 200 IU daily and then 400 IU daily until 6 months of age does not affect the rate of respiratory tract infections, but does reduce wheeze by 11%, when compared with a normal diet without vitamin D supplementation (98191). This study may not have been powered to detect a difference in respiratory tract infection between groups. In adults, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to reduce the risk of respiratory infections. Observational research in adults has found that low levels of vitamin D are associated with worsened respiratory tract infection complications, and even increased mortality from respiratory tract infections in older adults ages 50-75 years (103659). However, meta-analyses of prospective clinical trials in adults show that taking vitamin D supplements 300-4000 IU daily for 7 weeks to 5 years does not reduce the odds of developing a respiratory infection or severe respiratory complications, such as emergency department utilization, hospitalization, and death, when compared with placebo. These results were similar in subgroup analyses evaluating overall vitamin D dose and baseline vitamin D status (84689,105721). The largest single clinical trial, conducted in adults at least 60 years of age, shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 60,000 IU once monthly for up to 5 years reduces the duration of total and severe respiratory symptoms by approximately 0.5 days, but does not reduce the incidence of respiratory illness or hospitalization, when compared with placebo (105726,110825). A large meta-analysis of clinical studies in both children and adults shows that taking vitamin D does not reduce the risk of acute respiratory infections. While subgroup analyses revealed a reduced risk of acute respiratory infection in studies not exceeding 11 weeks' duration and with daily supplementation, these beneficial effects only persisted in studies considered to be of low quality (108435). Baseline vitamin D status was not assessed and the validity of these findings is limited by publication bias. Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the treatment of acute respiratory infections. A large meta-analysis of clinical studies in both children and adults shows that taking vitamin D improves outcomes (e.g., sputum conversion, survival rate, therapeutic success, need for intensive care admission) by a small, but not clinically relevant, amount. In subgroup analyses, these beneficial effects only persisted in studies considered to be of low quality (108436). The validity of these findings is limited by publication bias.
Tooth retention. Oral vitamin D with calcium seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily along with calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Most research shows that taking vitamin D with or without calcium does not reduce the risk of CVD or CVD complications. There is some speculation that there might be modest benefit in the elderly, but more research is needed to confirm. Details: Population research has found that low vitamin D levels, especially those below 15 ng/mL, are associated with an increased risk of developing CVD (15630,16618,93944). However, taking vitamin D supplements does not seem to prevent CVD. The majority of evidence from clinical research, population research, and meta-analyses shows that vitamin D supplementation, with or without calcium, does not reduce the risk of mortality, myocardial infarction, cardiac-related hospitalizations, or stroke when compared with placebo in patients with or without CVD risk factors (91343,97296,97305,97308,98902,98916,99762,109729,110811,110827)(112021,112022). The most reliable evidence comes from two recent meta-analyses of mainly high-quality clinical research investigating the effect of supplementation with vitamin D alone or with calcium for at least 1 year. These analyses show that vitamin D does not reduce major adverse cardiovascular events, stroke, CVD mortality, or all-cause mortality, regardless of baseline vitamin D level, vitamin D dosage, sex, formulation, or concomitant calcium supplementation (99762,109729). One large clinical trial in individuals at increased CVD risk shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol 60,000 IU monthly modestly INCREASES the risk of CVD- and presumed CVD-related mortality (110827). However, in some research, taking vitamin D 700-1000 IU daily shows a trend towards lower CVD events and reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in elderly patients (11931,98916,99762). Larger, high-quality trials with prespecified primary outcomes are needed to determine whether or not vitamin D supplementation reduces CVD risk in elderly populations.
Critical illness (trauma). Taking vitamin D 540,000 IU as a single oral dose does not reduce death or hospital stay in critically ill patients. However, limited research suggests that taking a smaller dose of vitamin D long-term might have a modest benefit. Details: The most robust evidence to date shows that correcting vitamin D levels in critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency does not reduce mortality rate or duration of hospital stay. A large, multicenter clinical study in critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency shows that administering a single, enteral dose of vitamin D 540,000 IU does not reduce 90-day all-cause mortality, duration of hospital stay, ventilator-free days, or other clinical outcomes when compared with placebo (103656). A previous meta-analysis of clinical research showed that vitamin D supplementation administered for a duration of 7 days or up to 6 months reduces the risk of death by 30% in critically ill hospitalized patients (95913). However, included studies were of low methodological quality, had high heterogeneity, assessed patients with and without vitamin D deficiency, and used variable vitamin D dose regimens and administrations methods (95913,95914).
Fractures. Most evidence shows that oral vitamin D alone does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. Some research shows that taking vitamin D with calcium prevents fractures; however, more research is needed to determine who is most likely to benefit. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin D alone does not seem to prevent fractures in older adults. Most adults in these studies did not have osteoporosis, although osteoporosis status was unclear in some research (10140,12933,14282,38970,39015,84660,95822,97296,102145,104619)(109059,110827). However, several meta-analyses suggest that taking higher doses of vitamin D (about 800 IU daily) in combination with calcium might reduce overall fracture risk in older patients (38942,38970,39015,84660,102145,110809). One meta-analysis of clinical research in community- or long-term care-living males and females at least 65 years of age shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily in combination with calcium reduces the risk of hip and non-vertebral fractures by 25% and 20%, respectively, compared with placebo (110809). However, discrepancies exist which are possibly related to the dose and form of calcium used in combination with vitamin D and/or the patient population. Some research shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily in combination with calcium 1200 mg daily as tricalcium phosphate reduces fracture risk by up to 31% while taking vitamin D with calcium carbonate does not reduce fracture risk (12929,14282,16878,110809). Some individual clinical studies in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years show that taking vitamin D plus calcium daily for 2-7 years does not prevent fractures when compared with placebo (14282,16878). Other confounding variables include the possible additional effects of hormonal therapy when given with calcium to postmenopausal adults and/or the inclusion of institutionalized patients with unclear osteoporotic status (95822,97296). Most research shows that taking vitamin D in combination with omega-3 fatty acids does not prevent fractures. A large clinical study shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily alone or with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily and/or strength training three times weekly does not prevent fractures in adults over 70 years of age when compared with placebo (104619). Another large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily, alone or with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, over approximately 5 years does not prevent overall fractures, nonvertebral fractures, or hip fractures in adults over 50 (males) or 55 (females) years old when compared with placebo. Although the osteoporosis status of the population was unclear, findings were consistent in adults at high fracture risk based on use of osteoporosis medications and/or a history of fragility fractures (109059). As of April 2018, the US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends against supplementing with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less along with calcium 1000 mg daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal adults. The USPSTF also concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with doses of vitamin D greater than 400 IU daily along with calcium doses greater than 1000 mg daily is safe or effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture (95695). For information on patients WITH osteoporosis, refer to the Osteoporosis discussion. There is limited research available regarding the effects of vitamin D supplementation for fracture prevention in children. Preliminary research in children aged 2 to 17 years with vitamin D insufficiency and one or more previous fractures shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily with calcium 600 mg daily for 6 months modestly reduces the risk of forearm fractures over 12 months compared with children not given vitamin D or calcium (110820).
Hypertension. Overall, vitamin D does not seem to prevent or lower high blood pressure in most patients; however, it may lower blood pressure in hypertensive patients with vitamin D deficiency. Details: Although population research has found that lower vitamin D levels are associated with a higher risk of developing hypertension, clinical research shows vitamin D supplementation does not prevent hypertension (15630) A large clinical trial in postmenopausal adults shows that taking vitamin D3 400 IU with calcium 1000 mg daily does not reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Most meta-analyses and clinical trials in patients with existing hypertension show that vitamin D supplementation does not lower blood pressure when compared with placebo, regardless of vitamin D formulation, dose, or duration of supplementation (16714,91340,96405,103657,104619). However, a meta-analysis of five clinical studies in patients with hypertension and vitamin D deficiency shows that supplementation with vitamin D reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by about 7 mmHg and 3 mmHg, respectively, when compared with placebo (100895). Similarly, an individual clinical study in patients with hypertension and vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly or 1000 IU daily reduces systolic blood pressure by about 6 mmHg and mean arterial pressure by about 4 mmHg, but does not affect diastolic blood pressure, when compared with baseline (108440). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
Prostate cancer. Oral vitamin D does not appear to affect prostate cancer progression or cancer-related mortality. Details: A meta-analysis of three clinical trials shows that vitamin D supplementation does not affect prostate cancer progression as measured by prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or mortality in patients with prostate cancer (99770).
Psychosis. Oral vitamin D does not seem to improve symptoms in patients with a functional psychotic disorder. Details: A clinical study in adults with a functional psychotic disorder shows that taking oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 20,000 IU monthly for 6 months has no effect on total positive and negative syndrome scale score (PANSS) when compared with placebo. The majority of patients included in this study were deficient in vitamin D at baseline (107226).
Tuberculosis. Oral vitamin D seems to be ineffective for reducing the severity of tuberculosis or mortality from tuberculosis. Limited research suggests that vitamin D may have small benefits in newly diagnosed patients receiving tuberculosis treatment for the first time. Details: Although population research has found that tuberculosis is associated with vitamin D deficiency, most clinical research shows that taking vitamin D does not improve clinical outcomes in people with tuberculosis infection. Meta-analyses and individual clinical studies show that taking vitamin D as a single 100,000 IU dose, or as 400 IU daily for 2 months, along with standard care does not improve tuberculosis severity or reduce the risk of mortality in children or adults with tuberculosis, regardless of their baseline vitamin D levels (82570,82475,98913,103655,103668,104022). However, some research has identified modest benefits in newly diagnosed patients receiving anti-tuberculosis treatment for the first time. A meta-analysis of clinical research in this population shows that taking vitamin D at a dose of 1000 IU daily or 600,000 IU monthly modestly increases the odds of sputum smear conversions by 1.2-fold, but does not improve the time to sputum smear conversions, when compared with placebo (98235). A small clinical study in treatment-naïve adults with low levels of serum vitamin D shows that taking calcitriol 0.25 mcg twice daily for up to 6 months, starting with anti-tuberculosis treatment initiation, decreases the time to sputum smear conversion and 50% lesion absorption by about 3 days when compared with not taking vitamin D (109045). Additionally, a small clinical study in children aged 6-18 years with vitamin D insufficiency receiving standard treatment for newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis shows that taking vitamin D 1000 IU daily reduces the duration of fever and cough by 1 and 2 weeks, respectively, when compared with placebo (108437).

Acne. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for acne. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with acne and vitamin D deficiency shows that taking cholecalciferol 1,000 IU daily for 2 months reduces the number of inflammatory lesions by about 35%, compared with 6% in those taking placebo. There was no effect on the total or non-inflammatory lesion count (106127). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking alfacalcidol (One Alpha, LEO Company, Denmark) 0.25 mcg daily for 3 months modestly improves acne severity when compared with taking placebo (106128). In addition, population research has found that individuals with acne have modestly lower vitamin D levels than healthy controls. The odds of vitamin D deficiency were approximately three times higher in patients with acne when compared with healthy controls (106105).
Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral cholecalciferol is beneficial for preventing age-related cognitive decline. Details: Pooled results of two large clinical sub-studies in community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older show that taking cholecalciferol 2000 IU daily for 2-3 years has no effect on cognitive decline when compared with placebo. A subgroup analysis in Black patients suggests a modest effect of vitamin D when compared with placebo (108428).
Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for this condition. Details: Some population research has found that lower serum concentrations of vitamin D are associated with higher risk of Alzheimer disease, and also with decreased cognition. People with Alzheimer disease seem to have serum concentrations of vitamin D that are about 2.5 ng/mL lower than patients without Alzheimer disease (84672,103666). However, other population research has found that vitamin D deficiency (<25 nmol/L) or insufficiency (25-50 nmol/L) is not associated with increased risk of Alzheimer disease (100899).
Asthma. Oral vitamin D might reduce asthma exacerbations in adults and children with mild, but not severe or persistent, asthma. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy or the first 6 months of an infant's life does not seem to prevent the development of asthma later in infancy or childhood. Details: Population research in patients with asthma suggests that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk of exacerbations and increased need for medication therapy (94693). However, findings from clinical research are mixed. Some meta-analyses of clinical trials in adults and children with asthma show that taking vitamin D for 3 months to 1 year reduces the rate of asthma exacerbations by 31% to 36% when compared with control (92690,94686). However, findings from more recent meta-analyses show that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of asthma exacerbations when compared with placebo (109728,109732,110833). The reasons for this discrepancy are not clear. However, some clinical research suggests that vitamin D supplements might only prevent asthma in people with non-persistent asthma (92690,94685,94686,94688,104020). Also, many studies are small and do not represent patients with severe asthma exacerbations (92690,94687). Baseline levels of vitamin D may play a role. A clinical study in children aged 6-16 years with persistent asthma and low vitamin D levels shows that taking vitamin D 4000 IU daily for 48 weeks does not reduce severe asthma exacerbations when compared with placebo (104020). However, a meta-analysis including this study shows that taking vitamin D does reduce risk of asthma exacerbations in children with low baseline vitamin D levels (109728). One meta-analysis shows that taking vitamin D seems to modestly improve pulmonary function when compared with placebo (109732). Vitamin D doses have varied, with oral doses of 500-4000 IU daily, 1000 IU once weekly, 60,000 IU once monthly, 120,000 IU every 2 months, 100,000 IU 14 days apart, or 100,000 to 600,000 IU as a bolus dose followed by 400-4000 IU daily (92690,94686,104020,109728,110833). Vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of asthma in infants has also been evaluated. A meta-analysis of 4 large clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D 400-1200 IU daily for the first 6 months of life does not reduce the risk of asthma or wheezing at 6-30 months of age when compared with control (112031). Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy has also been evaluated (97306,99763,102146,112031). A meta-analysis of 3 large clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D 2800-4400 IU daily during the 2^nd and 3^rd trimesters of pregnancy reduces the risk of recurrent wheezing by 23% but does not reduce the risk of asthma diagnosis within the first 3-6 years of life when compared with vitamin D 400 IU daily (112031). Some research suggests that the dose of vitamin D plays a role. A meta-analysis shows that prenatal vitamin D 800 IU daily reduces the odds of wheeze or asthma by 32%, while lower or higher vitamin D doses were not beneficial (103661).
Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for athletic performance. Details: One small clinical trial in athletes shows that taking vitamin D 20,000 or 40,000 IU once weekly for 2 doses does not affect performance on vertical jumps, sprints, or leg and bench presses when compared with placebo (98188). Another small clinical trial in professional rugby players shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 50,000 IU once every two weeks over 12 weeks does not improve sprinting speed or the ability to perform bench presses, bench pulls, and chin-ups when compared with placebo (98189). Also, most research shows that taking vitamin D does not improve measures of cardiorespiratory fitness. One small study in young males undergoing resistance training shows that taking vitamin D 8000 IU daily for 12 weeks does not improve cardiorespiratory fitness compared with taking placebo (110812).
Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Most research shows that oral vitamin D reduces eczema severity in children. However, most research shows that oral vitamin D, taken during pregnancy or infancy, does not prevent eczema in the child. Details: A meta-analysis of eight moderate-quality clinical trials in children shows that taking vitamin D, most commonly 1000-2000 IU daily for 4-12 weeks, modestly reduces severity of eczema when compared with placebo (109728). Most of the children in these studies were also given conventional medications. Oral vitamin D has also been evaluated for eczema prevention. A meta-analysis of two clinical studies shows that consuming vitamin D 2800-4400 IU daily during the 2^nd and 3^rd trimesters of pregnancy is not associated with a reduced risk for eczema in children during the first 3 years of life when compared with vitamin D 400 IU daily (97306). Another meta-analysis of five large clinical studies shows that prenatal or infant vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of developing eczema when compared with low-dose vitamin D, placebo, or no intervention (108438).
Atrial fibrillation. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing atrial fibrillation. Details: A large clinical trial in adults without cardiovascular disease shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for an average of 5 years does not reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation when compared with placebo or fish oil 840 mg daily (105209). However, observational research in postmenopausal adults with osteoporosis found that vitamin D supplementation is associated with a lower occurrence of atrial fibrillation when compared with not taking vitamin D (98922). Also, one large observational study in vitamin D-deficient patients with no history of atrial fibrillation has found that vitamin D supplementation for at least 6 months is associated with up to a 16% decreased risk of atrial fibrillation when compared with not taking vitamin D. There were also modest improvements in atrial fibrillation-free survival. In males 65 years and older with hypertension or diabetes at baseline, blood levels of at least 30 ng/mL following vitamin D supplementation were associated with decreased risk of atrial fibrillation; a post-supplementation blood level of 21-29 ng/mL was not associated with decreased risk (109043).
Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for ADHD. Details: A small clinical trial in children 5-12 years of age with ADHD and vitamin D insufficiency shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily along with methylphenidate for 8 weeks seems to improve parental ratings of evening, but not morning or overall, symptoms of inattentiveness and impulsivity when compared with methylphenidate alone. Vitamin D insufficiency was defined as levels less than 30 ng/mL (98196). Based on these and other preliminary findings, Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that vitamin D in doses of 1500 to 4000 IU daily is weakly recommended for adjunctive use in children with ADHD, especially those with insufficient intake or skin exposure to sunlight (110318).
Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for autism spectrum disorder. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 2.5-8 years with autism spectrum disorder shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 12 months modestly reduces irritability and hyperactivity when compared with placebo (99767).
Bacterial vaginosis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for bacterial vaginosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in females at high risk for sexually transmitted disease shows that taking vitamin D along with standard therapy for bacterial vaginosis does not reduce the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis when compared with placebo. Patients in this study had been treated with metronidazole 500 mg orally twice daily for 7 days along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 50,000 IU each week for 4 weeks and then every 4 weeks for the remaining 20 weeks (91348).
Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention of breast cancer. Details: Some population research evaluating intake of calcium plus vitamin D suggests that higher vitamin D intake is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer in premenopausal or postmenopausal adults (15631). Similarly, a large observational study in females with a biological sibling with breast cancer has found that taking vitamin D recently or prior to enrollment is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer when compared with nonrecent vitamin D use or never taking vitamin D, respectively (107215). However, other research found that higher vitamin D intake is associated with a 17% reduced risk of breast cancer in premenopausal and perimenopausal, but not postmenopausal, adults (39001). Observational research has also examined the association between blood levels of vitamin D and risk of developing breast cancer. A meta-analysis found that those with serum levels of about 52 ng/mL had a 50% lower risk of developing breast cancer when compared with those with serum levels of less than 13 ng/mL. This high serum level of vitamin D corresponds to a high dose of about 4000 IU daily (16049). Other observational research has found that baseline vitamin D levels of more than 20 ng/mL are associated with a 48% reduced risk of developing breast cancer over approximately 9 years in Latina females in the US when compared with levels below 20 ng/mL; however, this association was not present in Black females (109058). Despite the contradictory findings from observational research, results from clinical research are generally negative. Evidence from one large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative) shows that postmenopausal adults who take vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years do not have a significantly reduced risk of developing breast cancer (16715,98895). Also, a meta-analysis of two large-scale clinical trials, which did not include the Women's Health Initiative trial, shows that taking vitamin D 800-1000 IU daily, alone or with calcium, for 3-4 years does not reduce the incidence of breast cancer in postmenopausal adults, although there was a trend towards reduced risk with higher doses of vitamin D supplementation (97301). While vitamin D and calcium supplementation during the intervention period of the Women's Health Initiative trial was not associated with a reduced risk of developing breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a precursor to breast cancer, a secondary post-hoc analysis of the data shows that supplementation reduces the risk of developing DCIS by 18% over a median follow-up of 19 years (107216). Additional research is needed regarding an optimal dose of vitamin D, timing of initiation, and whether any benefit is affected by menopausal status.
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Limited research suggests that vitamin D deficiency is linked with bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the infant. Details: Observational research has found that vitamin D deficiency at birth is associated with about a 2-fold increased odds of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (104021). However, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial.
Cancer. Vitamin D does not seem to reduce overall cancer risk. However, some research shows that vitamin D might slightly reduce the risk of metastatic cancer and cancer-related mortality. Details: There is interest in vitamin D for cancer PREVENTION, as observational research suggests that higher vitamin D intake and higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with a lower risk of cancer (111150). While individual clinical trials evaluating vitamin D for cancer have produced inconsistent findings, most meta-analyses and clinical trials show that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) alone or with calcium does not significantly reduce the risk of developing cancer (15629,91344,93943,97296,98916,104024,104618,110811). However, vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of metastatic cancer and cancer-related mortality. A large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D3 2000 IU daily for a median of 5.3 years slightly reduces the risk of advanced metastatic or fatal cancers when compared with placebo (104618). Additionally, meta-analyses of several large clinical trials show that taking vitamin D 400-4000 IU daily, with or without calcium, for 1-7 years reduces the risk of cancer-related mortality by 12-13% when compared with control, while intermittent bolus dosing of vitamin D at high doses for 1-5 years does not appear to reduce the risk of cancer-related mortality (104024,111149). The role of vitamin D in cancer TREATMENT is unclear. A meta-analysis of clinical and observational research suggests that supplementation of vitamin D after a cancer diagnosis is associated with a modest improvement in overall survival, but not progression-free or cancer-specific survival (109726). Doses used in clinical research ranged between 1200 IU and 8000 IU daily or 100,000 IU every 50 days, after surgery and/or during treatment (99195,99196,109726). Other clinical research in patients with luminal gastrointestinal cancers shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily does not reduce the risk of relapse when compared with placebo (99195). It is unclear which, if any, types or stages of cancer respond best to vitamin D, and what dose of vitamin D is optimal.
Child growth. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for improving infant growth or bone structure. Details: Meta-analyses and individual clinical trials show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy modestly increases length at birth and bone mineral density at up to 6 years of age when compared with control, usually placebo or vitamin D 400 IU daily. However, there was no effect on length in the infant up to one year of age, weight at birth or up to one year of age, head circumference at birth or up to 6 years of age, bone mineral content at up to 6 years of age, or neonatal bone mineral density, bone mineral content, bone area, or femur or humoral length (98198,109737,112028). In the available research, vitamin D was taken in doses of 200 IU to 4400 IU daily, 4200 IU to 50,000 IU weekly, 50,000 IU every 2 weeks, or 60,000 IU every 4-8 weeks, starting from the early to late stages of pregnancy and usually continued until birth (98198,109737).
Chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with CKD. Most research suggests that it does not reduce the risk for adverse cardiovascular events. Details: Population research in patients on dialysis has found that vitamin D levels less than 17.8 ng/mL are associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with higher levels (16619). A meta-analysis and individual clinical studies show that vitamin D and vitamin D analogues decrease parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels and urine protein levels in people with CKD (84376,84377,84628,98233,98236). However, taking vitamin D does not appear to decrease the risk of death or parathyroidectomy in CKD patients (84376,84377). Also, taking vitamin D increases the risk for hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia in this patient population (84376,84377,98236). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the prevention of cardiovascular events in adults with CKD. Observational research has found that vitamin D deficiency in patients with CKD is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. However, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to be beneficial. One clinical study shows that taking paricalcitol, an active form of vitamin D, titrated to maintain adequate serum calcium levels, for 48 weeks does not affect the size of the left ventricle or heart function when compared with placebo (98233). Other clinical research in Japanese patients on hemodialysis for CKD shows that adding alfacalcidol, another active form of vitamin D, 0.5 mcg daily to standard treatment for 4 years does not affect mortality or cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarctions, stroke, aortic dissection, and others compared to standard treatment only (98920). Also, a large clinical trial in patients with CKD shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol 2000 IU daily, alone or with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, does not affect major cardiovascular events or invasive cancer when compared with placebo (110811). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for musculoskeletal health in adults with CKD. A small clinical study shows that taking cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily, with or without physical activity, for 3 months improves bicep strength, but not back flexibility or aerobic fitness capacity, when compared with baseline. In patients taking cholecalciferol in combination with physical activity, musculoskeletal health was similar when compared with cholecalciferol alone (108431). However, this study was inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups, and it is unclear if the improvement from baseline differed between groups. Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the improvement of iron status in adults with CKD and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Clinical research shows that taking Vitamin D as cholecalciferol (Vitamin D3 Forte Renapharma) 8000 IU daily for 12 weeks does not improve iron status compared with taking placebo. However, a sub-analysis shows that hemoglobin levels are modestly improved in patients with a low Vitamin D status at baseline suggesting that Vitamin D might improve iron availability in these patients (110819).
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for COPD; benefits may be limited to patients with vitamin D deficiency. Details: Population research has found an association between low vitamin D levels and reduced lung function, increased risk of developing COPD, and worsening COPD severity (17685,96401). In contrast, 2 meta-analyses of clinical research in adults with COPD and with or without vitamin D deficiency show that oral vitamin D does not have beneficial effects on mortality, rate of COPD exacerbations, pulmonary function, or most measures of symptom severity when compared with placebo (109732,112485). However, other research suggests that vitamin D may be beneficial in patients with vitamin D deficiency. Some clinical research in patients with moderate to severe COPD and severe vitamin D deficiency shows that taking a specific vitamin D supplement (D-Cure, Laboratoires SMB) 100,000 IU once every 4 weeks for 1 year seems to reduce the rate of exacerbations by 43% when compared with placebo (98194).
Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for cognitive function. Details: Population research has found that low vitamin D levels are associated with worse cognitive performance and cognitive decline when compared to high vitamin D levels in healthy adults (84672,95916). However, the effect of vitamin D supplementation on cognitive function is unclear. One small meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation does not improve cognitive function (95916). However, the included trials evaluated a widely heterogeneous study population and utilized variable measures of cognitive function.
Cognitive impairment. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Details: A small clinical study in older adults with mild cognitive impairment shows that taking vitamin D3 10,000 IU three times weekly for 20 weeks in addition to exercise and cognitive training does not improve cognitive function when compared with placebo and exercise with or without cognitive training. However, most participants had sufficient serum vitamin D levels at baseline (112489).
Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of colorectal cancer. Details: Epidemiological research has found that a higher serum vitamin D level is associated with decreased risk of mortality and increased survival in patients with colorectal cancer (16101,99196). However, it is unclear whether vitamin D supplementation improves survival in patients with colorectal cancer, as research has generally involved small populations and results are somewhat conflicting. A subgroup analysis of one clinical study shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily does not reduce the risk of relapse or death, death due to any cause, or relapse over 5 years when compared with placebo in patients with colorectal cancer (99195). However, this subgroup may have been underpowered to detect between-group differences. Another small clinical trial in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer shows that taking high-dose vitamin D 8000 IU daily during the first cycle of chemotherapy, and then 4000 IU daily for subsequent cycles, does not increase median progression-free survival when compared with taking vitamin D 400 IU daily. However, patients taking high-dose vitamin D were 36% less likely to experience disease progression or death during follow-up when compared with patients taking the lower dose of vitamin D (99196). This latter result suggests that high-dose vitamin D supplementation might be beneficial for patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, but larger, multicenter studies are needed to confirm. The role of vitamin D in colorectal cancer prevention has also been investigated. A meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that a higher serum vitamin D level is associated with a decreased colorectal cancer risk; however, sub-analyses suggest that this association only occurs in females, not males (109740). Most studies have evaluated vitamin D supplements in combination with calcium; the effects of vitamin D supplementation alone are unclear. One meta-analysis of clinical research suggests that taking vitamin D plus calcium is not associated with a decreased incidence of colorectal cancer in people with a low baseline risk of colorectal cancer (39042). Another meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation, with or without calcium, does not reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer or colorectal adenomas (109730). Additionally, a large clinical trial suggests that postmenopausal adults who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290,98895). One clinical study shows that taking calcium supplements reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas, but not in people with lower than average vitamin D levels (12118).
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The evidence is mixed with respect to oral vitamin D supplementation for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Also, although some observational research has suggested a correlation between vitamin D status and risk for COVID-19, not all studies agree, and this association may be due to other confounders such as age and comorbidities. Details: Clinical and observational research has evaluated vitamin D supplementation for COVID-19 prevention. A preliminary clinical trial shows that oral vitamin D 800 IU or 3200 IU daily for 6 months in individuals with lower serum levels of vitamin D does not reduce the risk of COVID-19 or any respiratory tract infection when compared with no vitamin D supplementation (109721). However, groups were not matched for baseline vitamin D status and many individuals in the untreated group took their own vitamin D supplements. Two meta-analyses of clinical and observational studies show no relationship between vitamin D supplementation and the primary prevention of COVID-19 infection, although baseline vitamin D status is unclear (109040,112488). Also, a quasi-experimental cohort study in Italian adults who had supplemented with vitamin D in the 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis found no reduction in risk for hospitalization, as well as a trend towards increased risk for in-hospital mortality, when compared with those who had not received vitamin D supplementation (104625). However, some research disagrees. Clinical research in highly exposed healthcare workers shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily for 30 days reduces the risk of COVID-19 infection by 77% when compared with placebo (109052). Also, in the UK population, observational research has found that habitual use of vitamin D supplements between 2006 and 2010 is associated with a 34% lower risk of COVID-19 infection. This finding remained positive after adjusting for baseline health status and use of other micronutrients (104717). Further research is needed to determine whether vitamin D supplementation prevents COVID-19 infection. Vitamin D supplementation as treatment in outpatients with COVID-19 has also been evaluated. Preliminary clinical research discussed in a systematic review suggests that supplementation might be associated with less severe symptoms; however, there is inadequate information to determine if supplementation in patients with mild symptoms is associated with reduced hospital admission (109040). Conversely, a large cross-sectional study found an association between pre-hospital supplementation and increased risk for COVID-19, as well as increased rates of death and/or invasive mechanical ventilation. However, this association was no longer significant after adjusting for sex, age, and comorbidities (107205). Most research on vitamin D supplementation has been conducted in children and adults hospitalized with COVID-19. However, meta-analyses of clinical and observational research in these patients provides conflicting results on whether vitamin D supplementation as single dose or multiple doses is associated with a reduced risk of mortality, length of hospitalization, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), or need for ventilation when compared with placebo or standard care alone (109040,109733,112488,112490). The quality of evidence of most individual clinical trials is low to moderate due to a lack of placebo and blinding in many of the studies. Most individual studies evaluating single doses of vitamin D, administered either after diagnosis or after hospital admission, have not identified benefit for major outcomes, such as hospital length of stay, in-hospital mortality, or ICU admission. Many of these studies were small, low quality, and conducted in heterogenous populations, with doses ranging from 80,000 IU to 500,000 IU (104624,104626,107208,108434,109051,112490). One small, unblinded study in at-risk older adults admitted to the hospital or living in a long-term care facility shows that taking a single dose of 400,000 IU within 72 hours of diagnosis modestly improves survival at 14 days, but not 28 days, when compared with 50,000 IU (109039). The evidence related to multi-dose regimens in hospitalized patients is mixed. A cohort study shows that giving calcifediol 0.532 mg at hospital admission, followed by calcifediol 0.266 mg on days 3 and 7 and then weekly until discharge or ICU admission, reduces odds of in-hospital death within 30 days by 78% when compared with those not given vitamin D (106099). A small clinical trial in patients with vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D 25,000 IU daily for 4 days and then weekly for up to 6 weeks reduces length of hospital stay and duration of supplemental oxygen by 4 days and 3 days, respectively, and also reduces disease severity and ICU admission after 7 days (109050). A small, unblinded study in patients with suboptimal vitamin D status and mild to moderate COVID-19 shows that taking vitamin D3 5,000 IU daily for 2 weeks reduces the time to recovery from cough and loss of taste by 2.9 and 5.5 days, respectively, when compared with vitamin D3 1,000 IU daily. However, there was no difference in time to recovery from fever, dyspnea, body aches, or other symptoms (106117). However, some research disagrees. A small unblinded study has found that although vitamin D status at 9 days is negatively associated with the number of bed days, vitamin D 50,000 IU on days 1 and 8 does not affect the number of bed days, time to discharge, or ICU admission when compared with no supplementation (109047). An additional preliminary study in patients with severe COVID-19 and low blood levels of vitamin D shows that taking vitamin D (Plivit D3, Pliva) 10,000 IU daily while in the ICU or for at least 14 days does not reduce the number of days on respiratory support, or in the ICU or hospital, or improve survival rates when compared with no supplementation (110813). The relationship between vitamin D levels and COVID-19 has also been evaluated in pregnant patients. A meta-analysis of observational research suggests that, while lower vitamin D levels are not associated with an increased risk of COVID-19, the presence of severe COVID-19 symptoms in pregnant patients may be linked to lower vitamin D levels when compared with non-severe COVID-19 symptoms (112025). Limited research has investigated the effect of vitamin D in combination with other ingredients. Preliminary clinical research in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 shows that taking vitamin D3 (Davalindi, Medical Union Pharma, Cairo, Egypt) 2000 IU daily in combination with black seed (Baraka, Pharco Pharmaceuticals, Cairo, Egypt) 900 mg twice daily for 14 days modestly reduced the severity of some symptoms, including cough, diarrhea, fatigue, and pharyngitis, as well as the percent patients with viral positivity at day 7, but not headache, rhinorrhea, anosmia, or shortness of breath, or vomiting, when compared to standard care alone. However, taking vitamin D alone did not provide significant benefit (110265). The validity of individual studies is limited by generally poor designs. More research is needed to evaluate varying vitamin D dosing levels and schedules, as well as evaluated outcomes, and whether patients with vitamin D insufficiency are more likely to benefit from vitamin D supplementation. The relationship between vitamin D status and risk of COVID-19 infection or severe disease is unclear. Despite some observational research suggesting that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk for COVID-19 mortality, development of severe disease, such as pulmonary involvement, and extended hospitalization or admission to intensive care (107206,107207,108434), several meta-analyses of observational research as well as individual observational studies have found that vitamin D deficiency in adults is not associated with a higher risk for COVID-19 infection or with disease severity or mortality (104627,107208,107209). Additional observational research has found no association between vitamin D status and hospital length of stay, need for mechanical ventilation, mortality, or experiencing persistent feelings of fatigue or reduced exercise tolerance, otherwise known as "long-COVID" (106102,106116,106120,107206). However, one meta-analysis has found that when compared with mild disease, 65% more individuals with severe disease had vitamin D deficiency. Also, vitamin D insufficiency, defined as blood levels less than 30 ng/mL, is associated with a more than 80% increased chance of hospitalization or mortality due to COVID-19. Notably, many of these studies did not control for patient age or other comorbidities (104627). A more recent observational study has found that vitamin D status in patients with severe COVID-19 symptoms is inversely correlated with both ICU admission and death, with a 1% reduction in risk of ICU admission and 4% reduction in risk of death for every 1 ng/mL increase in 25-hydroxyvitamin D (106112). In one individual observational study, the association between vitamin D status and COVID-19 infection is no longer significant after adjusting for socioeconomic status, age, health status, body mass index, ethnicity, and other covariates (104628). In contrast, a small observational study of adults admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 has found that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk of mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality, even after adjustment for ethnicity and pre-existing conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, and diabetes. However, this study is small and does not adjust for socioeconomic factors (105720). Also, another individual observational study has found that the likelihood of testing positive for COVID-19 is increased in Black, but not White, adults who had a vitamin D level of 30-40 ng/mL at some point in the past year when compared with a level of at least 40 ng/mL, with risk decreasing as levels increased from 30 ng/mL to 40 ng/mL (104716). Patients should be encouraged to maintain adequate vitamin D levels. A joint task force has recommended 400-1000 IU (10-25 mcg) daily for those who are unable to spend 15-30 minutes in the sun each day (103659,104629).
Crohn disease. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D reduces relapses in patients with Crohn disease. Details: A meta-analysis of small, low-quality clinical studies in patients with IBD, including Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, shows that taking high- or low-dose vitamin D for up to 1 year reduces the rate of relapse when compared with control (98915). The validity of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies.
Dementia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for dementia. Details: Population research has found that patients with any type of dementia have serum concentrations of vitamin D that are about 2.5 ng/mL lower than patients without dementia (84672). However, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial.
Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for treating depression. Vitamin D does not seem to prevent the development of depression. Details: The role of vitamin D in the treatment of depression is unclear. Earlier meta-analyses of clinical research show that vitamin D supplementation does not improve overall symptoms of depression. However, some subgroup analyses suggest that vitamin D may be beneficial for improving the symptoms of depression in people with clinically significant symptoms, as well as those with baseline vitamin D deficiency (97295,97298). More recent meta-analyses of several clinical trials, that include some of the same studies, show that vitamin D modestly improves symptoms of depression in adults; however, subgroup analysis suggests that vitamin D does not improve depressive symptoms in older adults (110832,112786). These analyses are mixed over whether baseline vitamin D status affects results (110832,112786) and one of these analyses shows no evidence that the type of depression affects findings (110832). Another meta-analysis of generally small clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes and depression shows that taking vitamin D modestly improves depressive symptoms when compared with placebo or no intervention (110814). Although, results of an individual clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes are in contrast (108423). The evaluated research implemented one-time doses of 150,000-500,000 IU, as well as daily and weekly doses ranging between 400-5000 IU daily or 5000-100,000 IU weekly for 6 weeks to 2 years, with the most evidence of benefit related to one-time high doses. Cholecalciferol was the most common form of vitamin D used (97295,97298,108423,110814,110832,112786). Significant heterogeneity between studies and the wide variability in dosing strategies limit the validity of these findings, as well as identification of an effective dose or target population. Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the prevention of depression. One large clinical study (VITAL-DEP) in healthy patients 50 years and older shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for about 5.3 years does not prevent depression or depressive symptoms, or improve mood, when compared with placebo (103670). An analysis of a cohort of patients from the VITAL-DEP trial also shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 2 years does not reduce the risk of major depressive disorder or improve mood scores in patients with subthreshold depression or risk factors for late-life depression when compared with placebo (112032). In addition, a meta-analysis of several clinical studies suggests that vitamin D supplementation does not prevent depression based on subgroup analysis of patients without depression at baseline (112786). Based on these and other preliminary findings, Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that vitamin D in doses of 1500 to 4000 IU daily is weakly recommended for adjunctive or monotherapy use in patients with depression, especially those with insufficient intake or skin exposure to sunlight (110318).
Diabetes. Oral vitamin D might improve glycemic indices in some patients with type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention of type 1 or gestational diabetes. It is also unclear if intramuscular vitamin D is beneficial for the treatment of gestational diabetes. Details: Most meta-analyses of mainly small clinical trials show that vitamin D supplementation is beneficial for measures of glycemic control in patients with diabetes. However, the best evidence of benefit is in patients with baseline vitamin D deficiency. Three meta-analyses of small trials in patients with type 2 diabetes show that vitamin D supplementation reduces glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.20% to 0.25%, and improves serum insulin, fasting blood glucose, and measures of insulin resistance when compared with control (96403,110822,112487). Supplemental vitamin D seems to be most beneficial in patients with baseline vitamin D deficiency (96403,110822,112487). Furthermore, correlation analysis suggests an inverse relationship between serum vitamin D levels and serum insulin, fasting blood glucose, and measures of insulin resistance (112487). However, another meta-analysis of small trials in patients with vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency and type 2 diabetes shows that oral vitamin D modestly improves fasting blood glucose and postprandial blood glucose, but not HbA1c, when compared with control (107210). Most of the evaluated research implemented daily or weekly doses of vitamin D for 4-48 weeks (96403,107210,110822). However, one meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with diabetes shows that vitamin D improves HbA1c, insulin resistance, and insulin measures in studies lasting less than 6 months, but not in studies lasting longer than 6 months (99764). An additional meta-analysis suggests that most evidence of benefit is associated with doses of more than 2000 IU daily for 4-12 weeks (110822). One small, long-term clinical study in middle-aged and elderly patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily for 30 months reduces insulin levels and insulin resistance when compared with no supplementation. However, there was no effect on HbA1c or fasting blood glucose levels (109734). Thus, conflicting results may be related to the dose and duration of vitamin D supplementation, as well as patient characteristics at time of study entry, such as vitamin D status, baseline HbA1c levels, obesity, and medication regimen (97304,99764,109734,110822). Vitamin D has been evaluated for the prevention of type 1 diabetes. There is preliminary evidence that daily vitamin D supplementation (form not specified) in infants during the first year of life is associated with a reduced incidence of type 1 diabetes development later in life (10139). Also, a meta-analysis of population studies has found that vitamin D supplementation in early childhood is associated with a 29% reduced risk of developing type 1 diabetes later in life (84225). Vitamin D has been evaluated in patients with gestational diabetes. Some research has evaluated the effects of oral or intramuscular vitamin D on glycemic indices. The evidence from clinical research comparing vitamin D with placebo is mixed. Most studies show modest evidence of benefit for some markers of glycemic control. One clinical trial shows that vitamin D modestly reduces levels of insulin, as well as measures of insulin resistance, with no effect on fasting blood glucose (106125). However, other clinical research shows that taking vitamin D modestly reduces levels of fasting blood glucose and HbA1c, with no effect on insulin measures (106126). Two other trials show that taking vitamin D modestly improves all measures of glycemic indices (101775,106122). Additionally, a large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D 1600 IU daily modestly reduces fasting blood glucose when compared with vitamin D 400 IU daily (112020). Some clinical research has also evaluated the effects of oral vitamin D on lipid indices in patients with gestational diabetes. Although some individual clinical research disagrees (106126), most research shows that taking vitamin D modestly improves levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides when compared with control (106125,110823). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with gestational diabetes shows that taking vitamin D reduces the risk of premature birth and neonatal hospitalization by approximately 63% and 62%, respectively (110823). Oral vitamin D 50,000 IU (eg. D-Vitin50000; Zahravi Pharm Co.) once or twice monthly, starting at week 24 of gestation and continuing for 6 weeks, 8 weeks, or until delivery, has been used in most of these studies (106122,106125,106126). One study provided oral vitamin D 500 IU twice daily in yogurt from the beginning of the second trimester for 16 weeks (101775). However, other preliminary clinical research shows that giving vitamin D 300,000 IU as a single intramuscular injection at 24-28 weeks' gestation does not affect HbA1c (106124). Some research has examined the effect of vitamin D supplementation on insulin resistance during pregnancy in the absence of gestational diabetes. A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin D for 6 to 26 weeks modestly decreases measures of insulin resistance when compared with placebo. However, there was no evidence to suggest that higher doses were more beneficial than lower doses. Although this population did not have gestational diabetes, these results suggest that adequate vitamin D might be beneficial for its prevention (110821). Vitamin D has also been evaluated in combination with omega-3 fatty acids in adults with gestational diabetes. One study evaluated vitamin D in combination with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 360 mg plus docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 240 mg twice daily. There is some evidence that this combination offers benefit over vitamin D alone and plasma triglyceride levels were also improved (106122). Other clinical research in patients with gestational diabetes shows that taking vitamin D with omega-3 fatty acids 8,000 mg twice daily for 6 weeks modestly improves glycemic indices and most lipid markers when compared with placebo (106114). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the prevention of gestational diabetes. A meta-analysis of four clinical trials shows that vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of gestational diabetes by 49% when compared with placebo (100897). In addition, a meta-analysis of population studies has found that there is a U-shaped association between serum vitamin D concentrations and the risk of developing gestational diabetes, with serum concentrations between 40 and 90 nmol/L associated with the lowest risk (106109).
Diabetic foot ulcers. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for diabetic foot ulcers. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with diabetic foot ulcers shows that taking vitamin D modestly reduces ulcer size and improves glycemic and lipid indices when compared with placebo (110835). This meta-analysis is limited by the availability of three small clinical trials, as well as the heterogeneous doses of vitamin D in the included studies.
Diabetic nephropathy. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D improves some markers of kidney function in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in patients with diabetic nephropathy shows that taking vitamin D or its analogs reduces inflammatory markers and protein in the urine, but does not affect measures of kidney function such as serum creatinine or glomerular filtration rate, when compared to control (99771).
Dysmenorrhea. Limited evidence suggests that oral vitamin D reduces pain in patients with dysmenorrhea. Details: A meta-analysis of 9 small clinical studies in patients with dysmenorrhea shows that taking vitamin D in doses ranging from 5000 IU daily to 300,000 IU monthly modestly reduces pain when compared with control (112029). However, the validity of these findings is limited by a high degree of heterogeneity across the studies, including differences in blinding and control interventions, vitamin D doses and frequency of supplementation, and baseline vitamin D levels. Another small clinical study in adolescent patients with dysmenorrhea shows that taking vitamin D3 50,000 IU weekly for 9 weeks modestly reduces pain when compared to baseline (98912). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
Exercise-induced muscle damage. Small studies suggest that vitamin D does not improve exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 small studies shows that taking vitamin D before and/or during exercise does not improve circulating levels of creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, or myoglobin when compared with placebo (107218).
Fall prevention. The role of vitamin D in fall prevention is confusing and controversial. Oral vitamin D should be considered for those with vitamin D deficiency. Details: Higher serum levels of vitamin D have been associated with improved lower-extremity function in elderly adults (15636). Clinical research shows that taking vitamin D or vitamin D analogues, with or without calcium, reduces the number of people who have a fall by up to 19% (39038,84215,84374,84539,94130,104023). Other research shows that vitamin D, with or without calcium, reduces number of falls by 19% to 50% (11939,16275,84404,93941,109053). In these studies that show beneficial effects, the form of vitamin D (ergocalciferol, cholecalciferol) does not appear to influence results (39038,84374). Some clinical research shows a decreased rate of falls in patients with low baseline levels of vitamin D, but not in those with adequate vitamin D levels (84670,84684,109053). One meta-analysis also suggests that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol up to 1000 IU daily reduces fall risk by up to 19%, whereas studies using higher doses did not reduce the risk of falling (109053). Also, daily dosing, but not intermittent dosing, seems to be associated with a reduced risk of falling (109053). Despite a substantial amount of positive research, more recent clinical studies show that vitamin D does not reduce the risk of falling (84404,84670), the rate of falls overall (84670,93942), or the rate of injurious falls (93942) in elderly patients (93942). One study in adults over 70 years of age with a history of falling actually found that taking high-dose vitamin D, either as 60,000 IU monthly or 24,000 IU plus calcifediol 300 mcg monthly, increased both the risk of falling and the mean number of falls compared to a lower dose of 24,000 IU monthly (93940). One meta-analysis of 20 trials including nearly 30,000 patients shows that taking vitamin D, with or without calcium, does not reduce the risk of falling in elderly patients, regardless of baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D achieved with treatment, duration of treatment, or residential status of the patients (91342). While a meta-analysis of 10 trials in nearly 6,000 patients shows that taking vitamin D 700-1000 IU daily with calcium 1000-2000 mg daily reduces the risk of falling in the elderly by 12% when compared with placebo or no treatment, a meta-analysis of 21 trials in nearly 52,000 patients shows that vitamin D alone is only associated with a reduced risk of falls in patients with baseline vitamin D levels of less than 50 nmol/L when compared with placebo or no treatment (107224). The 2018 US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for fall prevention acknowledges this research by recommending AGAINST vitamin D supplementation for fall prevention in community dwelling adults 65 years of age and older who do not have osteoporosis or vitamin D deficiency (95703). The reasons for the disparate study results may have to do with the way in which clinical trials have reported outcomes. Clinical trials assessing the effect of vitamin D on fall risk may report results as the number of patients who experience one or more falls, the total number of falls, or the rate of falls per individual. This can affect ultimate conclusions and, in some cases, can be misleading. For example, when studies report on only the total number of falls, it is unclear if vitamin D reduces the rate of falls across the study population, or if it only reduces falls in a small subset of patients. Also, analyses of research suggest that the size of the clinical study appears to affect the trial results. Most trials showing significant reductions in fall risk have been small and of short duration (91342,94132); whereas larger and longer-term studies tend to show no benefit (13073,84399).
Fetal and premature infant mortality. Taking vitamin D during pregnancy might reduce the risk of fetal or early infant death. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy reduces the risk of intrauterine or neonatal death by 31% when compared with not supplementing with vitamin D. A sub-analysis shows that this benefit was limited to doses of up to 4000 IU daily (109055).
Fibromyalgia. A small clinical study suggests that vitamin D might improve pain in patients with fibromyalgia. Details: A small clinical study in fibromyalgia patients with low vitamin D levels shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1200-2400 IU daily seems to reduce pain, but not mood or quality of life, when compared with placebo (91349).
Food allergies. It is unclear if prenatal or infant oral vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of developing food allergies. Details: A meta-analysis of two large clinical studies shows that prenatal or infant vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of developing food allergies when compared with low-dose vitamin D or no intervention (108438).
Frailty. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of frailty in older adults. Details: Frailty involves a combination of muscle loss and weakness, with exhaustion and reduced ability for physical activity. Some observational research has found that low vitamin D status is associated with frailty occurrence. However, clinical research in community dwelling older adults shows that taking vitamin D as 1000 IU, 2000 IU, or 4000 IU daily for 24 months does not prevent frailty or attenuate the worsening of frailty when compared with low-dose vitamin D 200 IU daily. Baseline vitamin D status did not affect these findings. Also, a sub-analysis suggests that vitamin D 2000 IU might increase frailty; however, only a small number of participants were randomized to this dose (109046). Other clinical research in community dwelling adults at least 70 years of age shows that taking cholecalciferol 2000 IU daily for 3 years does not reduce the odds of becoming pre-frail or frail over 36 months when compared with placebo. However, when taken in combination with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily and a home exercise program, the odds of becoming pre-frail is reduced by 39% (110829).
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). A small clinical study suggests that vitamin D may modestly improve anxiety in patients with GAD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with GAD shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU once weekly for 3 months, in addition to taking an antidepressant and an anxiolytic, moderately reduces anxiety scores when compared with taking these medications alone (103654).
Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for improving outcomes in patients receiving HSCT. Details: A small clinical study in patients who have undergone an autologous HSCT shows that taking calcitriol 0.25 mcg three times daily for 30 days can reduce the time to absolute lymphocyte count recovery, but does not affect time to recovery of absolute neutrophil and platelet counts, when compared with placebo (103665).
Hepatitis C. Low levels of vitamin D have been associated with an inadequate response to hepatitis C therapy. Adding vitamin D to standard therapy for hepatitis C may improve viral response, especially in specific genotypes. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with hepatitis C genotypes 2-3 receiving standard therapy with PEG-interferon and ribavirin shows that adding vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 24 weeks results in 95% of patients achieving undetectable levels of hepatitis C RNA, compared to only 77% of patients treated with standard therapy alone (98917). Another small clinical study in patients with hepatitis C genotype 1b receiving the same standard therapy shows that adding vitamin D 1000 IU daily for 16 weeks results in about 79% of patients achieving undetectable levels of hepatitis C RNA, compared to about 55% of patients treated with standard therapy alone. The TT genotype seems to be especially susceptible to vitamin D supplementation, while TG/GG genotype does not seem to be susceptible (98923).
HIV/AIDS. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for improving bone mineral density (BMD) in children and young adults with HIV. Details: Vitamin D deficiency and hyperparathyroidism are common in children and young adults with HIV. A meta-analysis of two clinical trials in this population shows that taking cholecalciferol for 12 months does not improve spine BMD when compared with placebo. Also, an analysis of two clinical trials shows that taking doses of 1600 IU to 4000 IU daily does not improve spine BMD when compared with taking doses of 400-800 IU daily. However, taking higher dose vitamin D has a small beneficial effect on total BMD when compared with taking lower doses. There was no improvement on parathyroid hormone levels (110824). This meta-analysis is limited by the availability of small clinical trials, as well as the heterogeneous doses of vitamin D used in the included studies.
Hyperlipidemia. Although population research has found that higher vitamin D levels are associated with improved lipid levels, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial. Details: Population research has found that higher vitamin D levels are associated with lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels and higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels when compared with lower vitamin D levels (15630,98919). However, supplementation might not be beneficial. A meta-analysis of small clinical studies suggests that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol, ergocalciferol, alfacalcidol, or calcitriol slightly increases LDL cholesterol, but does not affect total cholesterol, triglycerides, or HDL cholesterol, when compared with placebo (84642). The validity of these findings is limited by the variability in patient populations, vitamin D dose and formulation, and study duration. Also, none of the included studies were prospectively designed to test the effect of vitamin D on lipid levels. Another meta-analysis of clinical studies in a mixed population of healthy patients and patients with metabolic disease shows that taking vitamin D 1400-50,000 IU weekly with calcium 500-2000 mg daily results in very modest improvements in total cholesterol, triglyceride, and HDL cholesterol levels, but not LDL or very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that effects are more pronounced in patients with metabolic disease (107227). The validity of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies, which persisted throughout subgroup analyses.
Hyperthyroidism. Oral vitamin D has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Observational research suggests that serum vitamin D levels are decreased in patients with newly diagnosed Graves' disease. A small preliminary clinical trial in patients with newly diagnosed Graves' disease taking methimazole and low levels of selenium and vitamin D shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol for 270 days, in combination with selenium for the first 180 days, modestly reduces levels of serum free thyroxine and improves quality of life when compared with no vitamin D or selenium. However, taking vitamin D and selenium did not affect levels of free triiodothyronine or positive thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor antibody (109049).
Hypothyroidism. It is unclear if vitamin D is beneficial in the treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism. Details: A preliminary clinical study in patients with vitamin D deficiency and subclinical hypothyroidism shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 2 weeks improves mean thyroid stimulating hormone levels by 3.55 mIU/L from baseline. The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group (107213).
Ichthyosis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with inherited ichthyosis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with congenital non-syndromic ichthyosis shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 24 weeks reduces the clinical severity of disease at 12 weeks, but not 24 weeks, when compared with baseline. When compared with patients taking acitretin 0.5 mg/kg daily, results were similar at both 12 and 24 weeks, but it is unclear if the improvement from baseline differed between groups (108441).
IgA vasculitis. It is unclear if oral alfacalcidol is beneficial in children with IgA vasculitis. Details: A clinical study in children with IgA vasculitis shows that taking alfacalcidol 0.25 mcg daily along with vitamin C, rutin, dipyridamole, cimetidine, calcium, and glucocorticoids for 4 weeks improves rates of recurrence and incidence of kidney damage when compared with those receiving the same regimen without alfacalcidol. Alfacalcidol also improves cellular immune function and reduces levels of inflammatory biomarkers (107212).
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for IBS; the available research is conflicting. Details: Although some meta-analyses show that taking vitamin D is moderately more effective than placebo for improving IBS symptom severity and quality of life, other analyses disagree. Doses of vitamin D have included 50,000 IU weekly or every 2 weeks or 2000-4000 IU daily for up to 6 months (109041,109054,109057). The reasons for these discrepancies might be attributed to the inclusion criteria related to the individual trials, the small sample sizes, and varied dosing strategies used in the available research.
Kidney transplant. It is unclear if oral cholecalciferol is beneficial for improving allograft function or preventing non-skeletal complications in kidney transplant recipients. Details: Following a kidney transplant, patients are at increased risk of vitamin D insufficiency and related outcomes. A large clinical trial shows that taking a high dose of cholecalciferol for 2 years does not reduce the composite risk of developing type 2 diabetes, major cardiovascular events, or cancer, or death when compared to taking a lower dose. The high and low doses of vitamin D were 100,000 IU or 12,000 IU, respectively, every 2 weeks for 2 months, followed by monthly doses for the next 22 months (110830). The effect of a high dose of vitamin D on these outcomes individually is not clear. However, taking vitamin D does not seem to improve allograft function. A clinical study in kidney transplant recipients shows that taking cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily, beginning 1-month posttransplant and continuing for 11 months, has no effect on allograft function when compared with placebo (108425).
Kidney transplant-related bone loss. Oral vitamin D might be beneficial for preventing bone loss associated with kidney transplantation. Details: A large clinical trial shows that taking a high dose of cholecalciferol for 2 years modestly reduces the odds of a fracture by 76% when compared to taking a lower dose. The high and low doses of vitamin D were 100,000 IU or 12,000 IU, respectively, every 2 weeks for 2 months, followed by monthly doses for the next 22 months (110830). A prespecified secondary analysis of a clinical study in patients at 1-month post-kidney transplant from a living donor in Japan shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 4000 IU daily for months 1-12 posttransplant reduces whole blood parathyroid hormone levels by 15%, but does not alter levels of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5-b or bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, when compared with placebo. The greatest effects on parathyroid hormone levels are observed in those with more severe vitamin D deficiency, hypocalcemia, and more preserved kidney function. Vitamin D supplementation also attenuates changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, but not the distal radius, from prior to transplant. Patients taking vitamin D had a loss of only 0.2%, compared with a loss of 2% in those receiving placebo. The greatest effects are observed in those with osteoporosis or osteopenia (107220). Conversely, a small clinical trial shows that taking calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) 0.25 mcg daily in combination with calcium carbonate 500 mg daily does not decrease bone loss associated with kidney transplantation. However, calcitriol might reduce osteoclast suppression, help maintain trabecular bone volume and wall thickness, and improve axial BMD (4823).
Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). Taking vitamin D might slow prediabetes progression to diabetes in people with low baseline levels of vitamin D or in people achieving high levels of vitamin D following supplementation. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial in people with prediabetes and sufficient vitamin D levels. Details: Observational research has found that low vitamin D levels are linked with a higher risk of prediabetes and higher dietary vitamin D is linked with a lower chance of developing diabetes (84594,103669). Meta-analyses and individual clinical studies in patients with prediabetes and unclear or sufficient vitamin D levels show that vitamin D supplementation might improve some glycemic indices, but does not seem to prevent progression of prediabetes to diabetes (84594,91347,99769,108421). However, a more recent meta-analysis of three clinical studies that were designed to evaluate the preventative effects of oral vitamin D in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking vitamin D reduces the risk of developing diabetes with an absolute risk reduction of 3.3% over 3 years compared with taking placebo. However, the actual risk reduction was highly dependent on the intra-trial vitamin D status. Patients achieving the highest serum vitamin D levels had absolute 3-year risk reductions of 11.4% to 18.1%. Doses of vitamin D used in this research include cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily or 20,000 IU weekly or eldecalcitol 0.75 mcg daily (110810). In patients with vitamin D deficiency and prediabetes, vitamin D might improve beta-cell function, suggesting reduced disease progression (99768,107210). One clinical study in adults with vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 3 months, and then monthly for 3 months, modestly improves insulin resistance and beta-cell function as measured by the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), but does not affect fasting or postprandial glucose levels when compared with placebo (99768). Further, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients with vitamin D deficiency and prediabetes shows that oral vitamin D at a median dose of 50,000 IU weekly for 26 weeks modestly improves fasting blood glucose and some markers of islet function, but not postprandial blood glucose or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, when compared with control. Additionally, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving vitamin D supplementation regressed from prediabetes to normal glucose status (107210). Conversely, a study in females with vitamin D deficiency and prediabetes shows that taking vitamin D 60,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose of 200 IU daily after repletion, has no effect on the incidence of type 2 diabetes at 2 years (107211).
Infant development. It is unclear if giving oral vitamin D in doses above the recommended dietary allowance during infancy is beneficial for improving neurodevelopment. It is also unclear if oral vitamin D during pregnancy is beneficial for improving cognitive development in the offspring. Details: Clinical research shows that giving vitamin D 1200 IU daily to healthy term infants of Northern European ethnicity starting at 2 weeks of age does not improve measures of neurodevelopment at 2 years of age when compared with giving the standard dose of vitamin D 400 IU (106121). Overall, the evidence from population research is mixed as to whether vitamin D status during gestation is associated with infant developmental outcomes. However, some population research has found that increased vitamin D status during pregnancy is associated with improved anthropomorphic and neurodevelopmental outcomes (104621,105724). Two meta-analyses of observational research show that low vitamin D status during pregnancy is associated with reduced head circumference and cognitive development scores, and higher odds of the offspring developing autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (105724,105725). However, one meta-analysis suggests these risks may be limited to those with very low vitamin D status (serum level < 12 ng/mL) (105724). Multiple meta-analyses show that vitamin D status during pregnancy does not appear to affect motor development (105724,105725). In one observational study, plasma vitamin D concentrations in the second trimester of pregnancy was associated with increased IQ scores in the offspring at age 4-6 years. Each 10 ng/mL increase in vitamin D levels was associated with a 1.17-point increase in IQ (104621). In contrast, clinical research shows that taking vitamin D3 2800 IU daily during the third trimester does not improve neurodevelopmental outcomes in the first 6 years of life when compared to taking lower doses of 400 IU daily (104623).
Infertility. It is unclear if oral or intramuscular vitamin D is beneficial in females with infertility. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in infertile females shows that although there was no effect of taking vitamin D on implantation rate or miscarriage, taking vitamin D increases the odds of clinical pregnancy by 49% compared with taking placebo. However, sub-analyses of clinical and observational research found that benefits on clinical pregnancy rates were limited to populations with vitamin D insufficiency, but not vitamin D deficiency, and for doses between 1000 to 10,000 IU daily for 30-90 days (110818). Most studies included in the analysis used oral vitamin D; however, intramuscular vitamin D was used in one cohort study. A smaller meta-analysis of clinical studies in females with infertility and vitamin D insufficiency undergoing IVF shows that taking vitamin D increases the rate of chemical pregnancy by 50%, but has no effect on the clinical pregnancy rate (108432).
Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D prevents lung cancer or improves lung cancer prognosis. Details: A small meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational research has found that high intake of vitamin D is associated with a 10% reduction in the risk of developing lung cancer when compared with low vitamin D intake. In terms of prognosis, high vitamin D intake is associated with improvements in both overall survival and relapse-free survival (107217).
Low birth weight. It is unclear if oral vitamin D can reduce the risk for low birth weight; the available evidence is conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that a very low vitamin D status (serum level <12 ng/mL) during pregnancy is associated with lower birth weight and increased odds of SGA births. However, these risks have not been demonstrated in those with less severe vitamin D deficiency (serum level <20 ng/mL) (105724). Most research also shows that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy reduces the risk of low birth weight. A meta-analysis of three clinical trials shows that supplementation with vitamin D 800-1000 IU daily starting between 27 and 32 weeks' gestation, or 200,000 IU administered as a single dose or in two divided doses during the seventh and eighth month of pregnancy, reduces the risk of delivering a low birth weight infant by 60% (84659). Other meta-analyses of clinical research confirm that supplementation with vitamin D during pregnancy results in a 45% to 60% reduced risk of low birth weight and a 103 gram greater average birth weight (99766,100897). However, some meta-analyses show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of low birth weight when compared with no supplementation (95910,109055). One meta-analysis that included studies that did not directly measure birth weight shows no effect of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on the rate of low birth weight, despite showing an increase in overall birth weight of about 58 grams (95910).
Male infertility. It is unclear if oral cholecalciferol is beneficial in males with infertility. Details: A small clinical study in males with infertility shows that taking cholecalciferol 2500 IU daily for 6 months modestly improves progressive sperm motility, sperm concentration, and sperm morphology when compared with baseline (108427). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
Melanoma. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with melanoma. Details: A meta-analysis of 14 observational studies suggests that vitamin D deficiency is associated with a 45% greater risk of melanoma when compared with normal vitamin D levels (112027). However, a small clinical study in patients with newly resected stage II melanoma shows that taking vitamin D3 100,000 IU every 50 days for 3 years does not improve disease-free survival when compared with placebo. Most patients in this study had vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency at baseline (106113).
Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing or treating metabolic syndrome. Details: In patients with metabolic syndrome, clinical research shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 16 weeks does not affect most metabolic or anthropometric factors when compared with placebo, although there was a modest decrease in triglyceride levels (106123). However, almost all of the individuals in this study were vitamin D deficient or insufficient, and many remained in that category even after supplementation. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial in vitamin D sufficient patients with metabolic syndrome. There is conflicting evidence about the association between vitamin D and metabolic syndrome (14265,16713,98234). Some population research has found that higher vitamin D levels are associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome, while other research found no association (14265,16713). Furthermore, a small clinical trial in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that taking vitamin D 20,000 IU or 40,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks does not affect metabolic risk factors when compared with placebo (98234).
Migraine headache. It is unclear if oral vitamin D reduces the frequency of migraine. Details: A meta-analysis of three small high-quality clinical studies in patients with migraine shows that taking vitamin D 2000 or 4000 IU daily for 12-24 weeks or 500,000 IU weekly for 2 months reduces the frequency of migraines by 2-3 attacks monthly when compared with usual care or placebo (108439).
Multiple sclerosis (MS). Although vitamin D supplementation has been linked with a lower risk of developing MS, taking oral vitamin D supplements does not seem to reduce MS relapses. Details: Population research suggests that long-term supplementation with vitamin D 400 IU is associated with a 40% lower risk of MS in females. The effect seems to be dose-dependent. Consumption of at least 400 IU daily, mainly in the form of a multivitamin supplement, appears to have the greatest protective effect (11356). Additional population research in over 7 million people suggests that higher levels of calcifediol are associated with a lower risk of developing MS. In White adults, for every 20 ng/mL increase in vitamin D levels, there appears to be a 41% decrease in MS risk. However, this was not found in Black and Hispanic adults (15159). Vitamin D supplementation has also been examined in patients with MS. Population research suggests that taking vitamin D supplements and the maintenance of optimal blood levels of vitamin D are associated with a reduction in the development of new areas of demyelination detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over 24 months. However, there were no correlations between taking vitamin D or vitamin D blood levels and clinical outcomes (110816). Also, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to impact MS relapses or most symptoms in patients with MS. Meta-analyses of preliminary clinical research show that vitamin D supplementation does not affect the rate of MS relapses, overall symptoms, or the number of MS nerve lesions detected by MRI, regardless whether the vitamin D was low-dose or high-dose (98192,98914,106119). However, one meta-analysis of 6 small clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D for 8-96 weeks slightly improves fatigue scores when compared with placebo (112024). These analyses are limited by the small size and heterogeneity of most of the included studies and variability in dosing and duration of vitamin D regimens.
Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral vitamin D improves muscle strength in middle aged or older adults with low or sufficient levels of vitamin D. The available research is conflicting. Details: Clinical research in healthy older adults who are not deficient in vitamin D shows that oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation, with 800 IU, 1000 IU, or 2000 IU daily or 50,000 IU monthly, alone or in combination with a resistance training program, does not increase muscle strength when compared with placebo (11814,104619,108429). In patients 40-80 years of age with low vitamin D levels, taking vitamin D3 100,000 IU (2500 mcg) once, followed by 20,000 IU (500 mcg) weekly for 4 months, does not improve muscle strength when compared with placebo (103658). Similarly, one meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D does not increase grip strength, muscle mass, or muscle power when compared with control (91341). However, some research has found some benefit with the use of vitamin D supplements. One meta-analysis shows that taking vitamin D increases grip strength after menopause when compared with placebo or low-dose vitamin D, although a sub-analysis shows that beneficial effects are limited to individuals aged 60-69 years, when vitamin D is taken without calcium, when baseline vitamin D levels are at least 30 ng/mL, or when the treatment consists of the vitamin D analog alfacalcidol. This suggests heterogeneity between studies (109048). Another meta-analysis in elderly adults shows that taking vitamin D as calcifediol 10-30 mcg daily for a median of 24 weeks modestly improves hand grip strength and leg extension, but not leg flexion, when compared with baseline (109042). Also, some individual clinical research in older adults with low levels of vitamin D at baseline shows that taking vitamin D3 800 IU daily or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) 1000 IU daily for 12 months in combination with calcium 1000 mg daily modestly improves lower extremity or hip strength by 8% to 23% when compared with calcium alone (38915,84530).
Myalgia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for reducing myalgia associated with obesity. Details: Preliminary clinical research in obese individuals with vitamin D deficiency who are on a low-calorie diet shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly, alone or in combination with an aerobic exercise program three times weekly for 12 weeks, modestly reduces muscle pain when compared with only aerobic exercise three times weekly (106118).
Myelodysplastic syndromes. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Details: A small observational study in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes has found that taking calcitriol or calcifediol orally is associated with slowed disease progression (11825).
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral or intramuscular vitamin D is beneficial in children or adults with NAFLD. Details: Although findings from individual research are mixed, one meta-analysis of mainly small clinical trials in patients with NAFLD shows that vitamin D modestly improves insulin resistance and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, with no effect on serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels. Most studies included in the analysis used oral vitamin D 1000 IU daily or 50,000 IU weekly or biweekly for 3-6 months and compared with placebo; however, one study used a single intramuscular injection of vitamin D 600,000 IU compared with lifestyle modifications (109056). Vitamin D has also been evaluated in combination with fish oil. A clinical study in adults with NAFLD shows that taking oral vitamin D3 1680 IU daily in combination with fish oil or fish oil alone for 3 months improves serum ALT levels similarly to a control group (107186). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for use in children with NAFLD. One clinical study in children with obesity and biopsy-proven NAFLD shows that taking oral vitamin D3 2000 IU daily for 6 months with a hypocaloric diet improves liver histopathology in terms of steatosis, lobular inflammation, and NAFLD activity score at 6 months, but not hepatocyte ballooning or fibrosis, when compared with baseline. These improvements were not seen in the group receiving placebo with a hypocaloric diet, but it is unclear if the improvement from baseline differed between groups (107222).
Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking vitamin D3 1000 IU daily for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking vitamin D3 with calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate reduces the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but has no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma. Vitamin D taken alone has no effect on the risk for either type of cancer (104622).
Obesity. The evidence for the use of oral vitamin D in obesity is conflicting and unclear. Details: Population research has found that people with lower vitamin D levels are significantly more likely to be obese when compared to people with higher vitamin D levels (15630). Also, a large-scale, high-quality clinical trial in postmenopausal adults taking calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily for 3 years shows that these patients are more likely to lose weight and maintain their weight when compared with those taking placebo. This beneficial effect is mainly seen in females who have inadequate intake of calcium, less than 1200 mg/day, before starting a calcium supplement (15604). However, other evidence suggests that vitamin D alone does not improve weight loss. One clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D3 2000 IU/day without calcium for 12 months does not increase weight loss when compared with placebo in overweight and obese postmenopausal adults who are deficient in vitamin D at baseline (91345).
Orthostatic hypotension. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for prevention of orthostatic hypotension. Details: A secondary analysis of a clinical study in older patients with vitamin D insufficiency who are at an increased risk for falls shows that taking vitamin D 1000-4000 IU daily for up to 2 years has no effect on the risk of orthostatic hypotension or orthostatic symptoms when compared with those receiving vitamin D 200 IU daily (107223).
Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for osteoarthritis. Details: The evidence for the use of vitamin D in osteoarthritis is conflicting. Some clinical research shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily, or at a higher dose to reach serum vitamin D levels over 36 ng/mL, for 2 years does not reduce knee pain or loss of cartilage when compared with placebo in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (84688). However, another clinical study shows that taking vitamin D3 daily for 10 days and then vitamin D3 60,000 IU monthly for 12 months modestly reduces pain and improves function when compared with placebo in patients with osteoarthritis and vitamin D insufficiency (98199). It is possible that higher doses of vitamin D have an effect on osteoarthritis, while lower doses do not. Due to this conflicting and low-quality evidence, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommends against the use of vitamin D for any form of osteoarthritis (102114).
Otitis media. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with otitis media. Details: The relationship between vitamin D status and otitis media is unclear. Population research has found that having otitis media is associated with lower blood levels of vitamin D; however, lower vitamin D levels were not associated with greater risk of otitis media (98194).
Overactive bladder. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for overactive bladder. Details: A large clinical trial in older males shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily for 5 years does not reduce the odds of weekly overactive bladder when compared with placebo. In males with low serum vitamin D, taking vitamin D reduces the odds of overactive bladder at 5 years by 49%, including 34% reduced odds of overactive bladder with urinary incontinence and 81% reduced odds of overactive bladder without incontinence. However, urinary incontinence while sleeping or napping was increased (109738).
Overall mortality. Taking oral vitamin D alone does not seem to reduce mortality; however, there is some evidence that taking certain forms of vitamin D with calcium might have a modest benefit. Details: While higher vitamin D levels have been associated with a small reduction in mortality when compared with lower vitamin D levels (98187), clinical research shows that taking vitamin D does not reduce the risk of mortality. The most comprehensive meta-analysis to date shows that vitamin D supplementation alone does not reduce all-cause mortality when compared to control (100900). However, giving vitamin D with calcium may modestly reduce the risk of mortality. Meta-analyses show a 4% to 9% reduced risk of mortality when trials of vitamin D alone and vitamin D with calcium are pooled together (16102,97296,98186,112022). Finally, some research suggests that the type of vitamin D supplementation might influence the results. A meta-analysis of clinical research found that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) with or without calcium reduces mortality risk by 6%, while alfacalcidol, calcitriol, and vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) do not have benefit (84595,98186).
Pain (chronic). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for chronic pain. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with chronic pain shows that taking vitamin D for 1-24 months produces a 43% greater decrease in pain score when compared with placebo. However, the final follow-up pain score is similar for both groups (96402). The effect of vitamin D on pain based on pain-related diagnosis, vitamin D status, or dose is unknown.
Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for this condition. Details: Population research found that higher levels of vitamin D are associated with milder Parkinson disease symptoms, while deficiency is associated with increased risk of Parkinson disease (97000,99772). One small study shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1200 IU daily for one year might modestly slow the progression of Parkinson disease based on the Hoehn and Yars staging criteria. However, there was no improvement in disease severity according to the more widely used Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Stage (UPDRS). The UPDRS includes measures of activities of daily living and non-motor symptoms. Vitamin D had no effect on most quality of life measures (95915).
Periodontitis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for periodontal disease. Details: A meta-analysis of mostly observational research suggests that vitamin D levels are not associated with an increased or decreased risk of periodontitis (112026). Other population research suggests that higher blood levels of vitamin D may be associated with a reduced risk of periodontal disease in adults 50 years of age or older. However, this association was not found for adults younger than 50 years (15634).
Physical performance. It is unclear if oral vitamin D improves muscle strength in elderly adults. Details: Some clinical research in healthy older adults who are not deficient in vitamin D shows that oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation, with 800 IU, 1000 IU, or 2000 IU daily or 50,000 IU monthly, alone or in combination with a resistance training program, does not improve physical performance when compared with placebo (11814,104619,108429). Also, results from one meta-analysis of clinical research in postmenopausal females with low levels of vitamin D shows that taking vitamin D does not improve the timed up and go test when compared with placebo or low-dose vitamin D (109048). One meta-analysis that included studies specifically evaluating the use of calcifediol in older adults shows a large benefit on gait speed; however, only one study included in the analysis used this endpoint and other measures of physical performance were not affected (109042).
Pneumonia. High-dose oral vitamin D does not reduce pneumonia severity in children. Details: Although vitamin D supplementation might prevent respiratory tract infections in children, it might not prevent recurrent pneumonia. A small clinical study in children under 5 years of age with recurrent pneumonia and variable vitamin D blood levels shows that taking vitamin D 300,000 IU quarterly for 1 year does not reduce respiratory infections, severity of pneumonia, hospital admissions, or disease complications when compared with placebo (103667). However, it's unknown if vitamin D supplementation using lower and more frequent doses, or supplementation in patients with vitamin D deficiency, might be beneficial. Some observational research has found that having vitamin D deficiency is linked to a higher risk for developing community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) (102118). For information on other respiratory infections, refer to the Respiratory Tract Infection discussion.
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if vitamin D improves pregnancy outcomes and symptoms in patients with PCOS. Details: A meta-analysis of several mostly low quality clinical studies in patients with PCOS and vitamin D deficiency at baseline shows that intramuscular or oral vitamin D 200-10,000 IU daily for up to 24 weeks in addition to fertility treatment improves certain pregnancy outcomes including the rate of pregnancy, premature miscarriage, and premature delivery but does not impact the incidence of pregnancy complications including gestational hypertension or gestational diabetes mellitus when compared with control. This analysis also suggests vitamin D supplementation improves certain IVF-related outcomes including ovulation rate, fertilization rate, and number of mature oocytes (112787). Observational research in infertile adults with PCOS and insulin resistance suggests that normal vitamin D levels are associated with better embryo quality and increased pregnancy rate when compared with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency (100834). It is unclear if supplementation with vitamin D improves pregnancy rates in patients with PCOS. Some research has evaluated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on menstruation and follicular development in these patients. A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin D 400-12,000 IU daily for 2-6 months improves follicular development when compared with placebo. Taking vitamin D in combination with metformin 1500 mg daily also appears to increase the number of regular menstrual cycles by 85% when compared with metformin alone. However, no effect on follicular development was seen with the combination. Vitamin D alone does not appear to improve menstrual cycle regularity. Most studies included calcium supplementation as well; therefore, the benefits of vitamin D alone in patients with PCOS are unclear (96404).
Post-stroke fatigue. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for post-stroke fatigue. Details: A retrospective study in patients with post-stroke fatigue and vitamin D deficiency suggests that vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 600 IU daily is associated with improvements in fatigue severity at months 1 and 3 when compared with control. Neurologic disability also showed improvement at 3 months, but not at 1 month, when compared with control. It is unclear if improvements from baseline differed between groups (107225).
Pre-eclampsia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D during pregnancy is beneficial for pre-eclampsia prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of four small clinical trials shows that supplementation with vitamin D alone or with calcium during pregnancy reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia in pregnant adults by about 50% when compared with placebo (100897).
Precocious puberty. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of precocious puberty. Details: A meta-analysis of 43 studies, most of which are observational and involve young female subjects in China, suggests that vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency is associated with 2.25-fold greater odds of precocious puberty when compared with normal vitamin D levels. Further, this analysis suggests that taking vitamin D 200-1000 IU daily for 3-12 months along with a gonadotropic-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa) is associated with lower luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and estradiol levels and reduced bone age when compared with GnRHa therapy alone (112019).
Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for patients with gestational hypertension. Details: A subgroup meta-analysis of two low-quality clinical trials shows that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk for gestational hypertension when compared with control (95910).
Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with PMS. Details: Observational research has found that increasing dietary intake of vitamin D above 706 IU daily is linked to a reduced risk of developing PMS when compared with consuming 112 IU daily (13094). Furthermore, a clinical study shows that taking vitamin D 400 IU daily in combination with calcium 1000 mg daily can decrease the severity of PMS symptoms (16869). But it's unclear if the effects are due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. Another clinical study in adolescent females with PMS shows that taking vitamin D3 50,000 IU weekly for 9 weeks modestly reduces PMS symptoms when compared to baseline (98912). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
Preterm labor. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preterm labor. Details: Vitamin D deficiency, defined as serum levels less than 20 ng/mL, during pregnancy has been associated with a 25% increased risk of preterm birth (95911). The risk seems to be especially prominent in those with darker colored skin (103662). However, meta-analyses of clinical research show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of a preterm birth when compared with no supplementation with vitamin D (84659,95910,100897,109055). The effect vitamin D specifically in vitamin D-deficient patients is still unclear. Some small, heterogeneous, and low-quality studies show that vitamin D supplementation might reduce the rate of preterm birth in vitamin D-deficient patients (84659,95910,100897). Additional studies are needed to determine the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the risk of preterm birth.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Small clinical studies suggest that oral vitamin D may not improve symptoms in patients with RA. Details: Population research has found that higher intake of vitamin D from foods or supplements is associated with a lower risk of developing RA (12206,98200). However, a meta-analysis of two small clinical trials shows that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce pain or recurrence of RA when compared with placebo (98190).
Rhinosinusitis. Oral vitamin D has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients over 12 years of age with chronic sinusitis shows that taking 1 or 2 sachets of a specific combination product (Flogostop Forte, Humana Italia) containing vitamin D 600 IU, black currant, Boswellia serrata, and bromelain along with a nasal corticosteroid daily for 15-30 days reduces symptoms of nasal hyperemia and rhinorrhea when compared with corticosteroid nasal spray alone (111501). It is unclear if these findings are due to vitamin D, other ingredients, or the combination.
Sarcopenia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in older adults with sarcopenia. Details: A meta-analysis of randomized trials in older adults with sarcopenia shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 100-800 IU daily, with protein 10-44 grams daily or amino acids 2.5-6 grams daily, for 2-6 months moderately improves muscle strength, but not muscle mass or walking speed, when compared with placebo (105727). The validity of this study is limited by high heterogeneity and an unreported baseline vitamin D status. Similarly, a small network meta-analysis of randomized trials shows that taking vitamin D 500-1600 IU daily or 2500-5000 IU weekly with protein 20-80 grams daily or amino acids 3-32 grams daily with and without exercise for 3-18 months increases hand grip strength and shortens time to chair-stand, respectively, but not gait speed or lower-limb mass when compared with usual care (107221). It is unclear if these effects are due to vitamin D, protein/amino acid supplementation, exercise, or the combinations.
Schizophrenia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for schizophrenia. Details: Based on preliminary clinical evidence, Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that vitamin D in doses of 1500 to 4000 IU daily is not recommended for adjunctive use in patients with schizophrenia (110318).
Seasonal affective disorder (SAD). One small study suggests that a large dose of oral vitamin D can improve symptoms of SAD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with SAD suggests that a single dose of vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) 100,000 IU improves symptoms after one month when compared to baseline (83791). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
Seborrheic keratosis. It is unclear if topical vitamin D analogues improve symptoms of seborrheic keratosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research suggests that topical ointments containing activated vitamin D in the form of tacalcitol, calcipotriol or maxacalcitol, applied for 3-12 months, can reduce tumor volume by at least 40% in 75% of patients with seborrheic keratosis. Additionally, over 30% of patients seem to experience complete tumor resolution or a reduction in tumor volume of at least 80% (84033). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
Sexual dysfunction. One small study suggests that injecting a large dose of vitamin D might improve sexual function. Details: A small clinical study in females with vitamin D deficiency and sexual dysfunction shows that receiving an intramuscular injection of vitamin D as cholecalciferol 300,000 IU once at baseline and a second time 4 weeks later improves sexual function at 4 and 8 weeks when compared with placebo (100896).
Sickle cell disease. One small study suggests that oral vitamin D reduces pain and improves quality of life in children with sickle cell disease with vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency. Details: A small clinical study in children with sickle cell disease shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 40,000-100,000 IU weekly for 6 weeks reduces days with pain and improves physical activity and quality of life for up to 6 months when compared with placebo. Of the children included in the study, 82.5% had vitamin D insufficiency, while 52.5% were deficient in vitamin D (98918). It is unclear if vitamin D is effective for patients with sickle cell disease who have adequate levels of vitamin D.
Small for gestational age (SGA). It is unclear if oral vitamin D can reduce the risk for SGA births; the available evidence is conflicting. Details: Two meta-analyses of clinical research show no effect of vitamin D on the risk of SGA birth (84659,109055). However, one meta-analysis shows a 40% reduction in the risk of SGA births with vitamin D supplementation (95910). Also, one meta-analysis shows that when vitamin D supplementation is initiated before the 20^th week of gestation, the risk of SGA is reduced by 54% (109055). Most individual clinical trials are small and heterogeneous. Also, the formulation of vitamin D and/or vitamin D status at baseline may explain part of the discrepant findings. For example, a meta-analysis of observational research has found that a very low vitamin D status (serum level <12 ng/mL) during pregnancy is associated with increased odds of SGA births. This association does not seem to be present with less severe vitamin D deficiency (serum level <20 ng/mL) (105724).
Statin-induced myalgia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for patients with statin-induced myalgia. Details: Observational research has found that taking oral vitamin D supplements is associated with decreased symptoms of myalgia in patients taking statin drugs. In a small case series, patients who discontinued statins due to myalgia were able to resume statin therapy after starting vitamin D supplements. The majority of patients with myalgia were found to be vitamin D deficient, with vitamin D levels less than 12 ng/mL at baseline (16829). An observational study has also found that administering 50,000 units of vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) once a week for 12 weeks reversed symptoms of myalgia in 92% of statin treated patients with low serum vitamin D levels of less than 32 ng/mL (16831).
Stroke. Although low vitamin D levels are associated with higher risk of stroke, taking vitamin D supplements does not seem to reduce stroke risk. Details: Population research has found that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk of stroke. Furthermore, increased dietary intake of vitamin D is associated with a reduced risk of stroke (15630,16618,93944,97303,106106). However, clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce stroke risk. Several meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials show that taking vitamin D alone or with calcium does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with or without cardiovascular disease risk factors (16616,91343,97296,97308,106106,112022). It is difficult to draw firm conclusions from these studies, as they did not assess whether patients had adequate vitamin D levels at baseline. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation might prevent strokes in patients with vitamin D deficiency.
Sunburn. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin D for the treatment of sunburns, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin D for this purpose.
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with SLE. Details: While some observational research has found that adults with SLE are more likely to have vitamin D deficiency than healthy controls (102119), a small cross-sectional study in females has found no association between serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, SLE disease activity, and the presence or absence of lupus nephritis (107214). A meta-analysis of three small clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily or 50,000 IU weekly seems to reduce anti-dsDNA positive, a marker of disease activity, when compared with placebo in patients with SLE (98190). However, the clinical significance of this finding is unclear. A small clinical trial in females with SLE shows that taking vitamin D3 5000 IU daily for 12 weeks modestly improves overall disease activity, but not quality of life, when compared with placebo (109735).
Thyroid cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with thyroid cancer. Details: Observational research in patients undergoing thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer suggests that taking vitamin D daily for at least 6 months after surgery is associated with a 38% lower risk of all-cause mortality and a 33% lower risk of total cancer-related mortality when compared with no vitamin D supplementation at around 10 years' follow-up. However, vitamin D does not appear to be linked to a lower risk of thyroid cancer-related mortality in these patients (112018).
Ulcerative colitis. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D may be beneficial in patients with ulcerative colitis. Details: A meta-analysis of mainly small clinical trials in patients treated with mesalazine shows that taking vitamin D for up to 24 weeks modestly increases clinical efficacy and reduces disease score when compared with mesalazine alone (109044). Also, a meta-analysis of small, low-quality clinical studies in patients with IBD, including Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, shows that taking high- or low-dose vitamin D for up to 1 year reduces the rate of relapse when compared with control (98915). These findings are limited because of the heterogeneity of the included studies.
Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for dementia. Details: A large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D 2800 IU daily, starting at gestational week 24 and continuing until one week after birth, reduces the risk of the child developing croup by 3 years of age by 40% when compared with olive oil as placebo. This risk reduction did not change after adjusting for the use of omega-3 fatty acids 2.4 grams daily, as well as for concomitant persistent wheeze and/or lower respiratory tract infections (109304).
Urinary incontinence. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D may be beneficial in middle-aged, but not older, adults with urinary incontinence. Details: Clinical research in middle-aged premenopausal females with stress urinary incontinence and low vitamin D status shows that taking vitamin D 5000 IU once weekly for 12 weeks has a moderate to large beneficial effect on the severity of incontinence and quality of life when compared with placebo. Kegel exercises were performed by all participants (109736). However, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to be beneficial for reducing urinary incontinence in older adults. In older females and males, a large clinical trial shows that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily for 5 years does not reduce the incidence or progression of urinary incontinence when compared with placebo (109738,109741). In older males with low vitamin D status, vitamin D supplementation may actually increase some types of incontinence (109738).
Urinary tract infections (UTIs). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention of UTIs in children. Details: A meta-analysis of 13 small observational studies in children suggests that lower levels of vitamin D are associated with 2.8-fold greater odds of UTI when compared with higher vitamin D levels. Further, this analysis shows that vitamin D deficiency in children is linked to 5.5-fold greater odds of UTI when compared with normal vitamin D levels (112030).
Urticaria. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of urticaria. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that having urticaria is associated with a slightly lower vitamin D blood level and a greater likelihood of vitamin D deficiency when compared with individuals without urticaria. In addition, a meta-analysis of 6 clinical trials shows that taking high-dose vitamin D at an average daily dose of at least 4100 IU has a modest effect on the severity of urticaria symptoms (106115).
Uterine fibroids. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing the recurrence of uterine fibroids. Details: A clinical study in patients with low vitamin D levels undergoing hysteroscopic myomectomy for uterine fibroids shows that taking vitamin D 1000 IU daily for 12 months has no effect on the rate of uterine fibroid recurrence when compared with placebo (108422).
Vaginal atrophy. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for vaginal atrophy. There is limited evidence on the topical use of vitamin D in vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal adults or patients taking tamoxifen. Details: A small cross-sectional study in postmenopausal adults has found that taking a vitamin D supplement for at least one year improves the maturation index of superficial vaginal wall cells when compared with those who do not take vitamin D. However, symptoms of vaginal atrophy were not different between groups (16879). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for vaginal atrophy due to tamoxifen. A small clinical trial in females with breast cancer using tamoxifen shows that receiving vitamin D 1000 IU vaginal suppositories daily for 8 weeks improves maturation index of vaginal walls and self-reported symptoms when compared with placebo (99773).
Vertigo. Vitamin D with calcium might reduce positional vertigo. It is unclear if the benefit is from vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking vitamin D 400 IU and calcium 500 mg twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination.
Vitiligo. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin D for vitiligo, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin D for this condition.
Warts. Although there is interest in using topical vitamin D derivatives for warts, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin D for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate vitamin D for these uses.

Safety view details

Below is general information about the safety of the known ingredients contained in the product R-PCT. Some ingredients may not be listed. This information does NOT represent a recommendation for or a test of this specific product as a whole.

ARIMISTANE - [FAST FACTS] (Androsta-3, 5-Diene-7, 17-Dione)

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally or parenterally. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other regulatory agencies warn that dietary supplements containing aromatase inhibitors are dangerous. Adverse effects associated with aromatase inhibitors include aggressive behavior, adrenal insufficiency, decreased rate of bone maturation and growth, decreased sperm production, infertility, kidney failure, and liver dysfunction (91094,102468).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally or parenterally. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other regulatory agencies warn that dietary supplements containing aromatase inhibitors are dangerous (91094). Avoid using.

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Ashwagandha has been used with apparent safety in doses of up to 1250 mg daily for up to 6 months (3710,11301,19271,90649,90652,90653,97292,101816,102682,102683) (102684,102685,102687,103476,105824,109586,109588,109589,109590). ...when used topically. Ashwagandha lotion has been used with apparent safety in concentrations up to 8% for up to 2 months (111538).

PREGNANCY: LIKELY UNSAFE
when used orally. Ashwagandha has abortifacient effects (12).

LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Black pepper has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when black pepper oil is applied topically. Black pepper oil is nonirritating to the skin and is generally well tolerated (11). ...when black pepper oil is inhaled through the nose or as a vapor through the mouth, short-term. Black pepper oil as a vapor or as an olfactory stimulant has been used with apparent safety in clinical studies for up to 3 days and 30 days, respectively (29159,29160,29161,90502). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of black pepper when used orally in medicinal amounts.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (11).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in large amounts. Fatal cases of pepper aspiration have been reported in some patients (5619,5620). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of topical pepper oil when used in children.

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (11).

PREGNANCY: LIKELY UNSAFE
when used orally in large amounts. Black pepper might have abortifacient effects (11,19); contraindicated. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of topical pepper when used during pregnancy.

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (11). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of black pepper when used in medicinal amounts during breast-feeding.

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Coleus extract 500 mg daily has been used for up to 3 months without significant adverse effects (91885,100851). ...when used intravenously and appropriately, short-term. Intravenous forskolin, a constituent of coleus, seems to be safe when given at an appropriate rate of 0.5 mcg/kg/minute and increased at 15 minute intervals to 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mcg/kg/minute up to 1 hour (7278,7279). ...when used by inhalation and appropriately. Single-dose inhalation of forskolin powder 10 mg from a Spinhaler inhalator seems to be safe and well-tolerated (7281). ...when used ophthalmologically and appropriately. Coleus suspension eye drops (1%) have been safely used in clinical studies (7282,7283,7284,7402,7403,7405).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in higher doses. Although coleus extracts have been used with apparent safety in doses up to 1.4 grams daily for 2 months (91884), taking coleus extract in doses exceeding 500 mg daily has been associated with an increased incidence of adverse effects, which are primarily gastrointestinal (100851).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally. Evidence from animal research suggests that high doses of coleus can inhibit embryo implantation and/or delay fetal development (25174); avoid using.

LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Powdered formulations of cowhage seed that are standardized to provide levodopa 75-400 mg daily have been used with apparent safety for up to 20 weeks (7020,7203,97266).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when the hair of the cowhage bean pod is used orally or topically. The bean pod hairs are strong irritants and can cause severe itching, burning, and inflammation (18).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. The typical diet supplies 2-24 mg of diindolylmethane daily (7170,7176,7664).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in medicinal doses. Diindolylmethane has been used with apparent safety at a dose of 45 mg daily for up to 6 months or at a higher dose of 100-140 mg daily for up to 3 months (47709,47729,93836,103830).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in doses of 600 mg daily. In one clinical study, two cases of grade 3 asymptomatic hyponatremia were associated with taking diindolylmethane 600 mg daily (47729).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. The typical diet supplies 2-24 mg of diindolylmethane daily (7170,7176,7664).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. The typical diet supplies 2-24 mg of diindolylmethane daily (7170,7176,7664). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of diindolylmethane when used in amounts greater than those found in foods during pregnancy and lactation; avoid using.

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally. Although the safety of purified laxogenin, or its synthetic analogue 5-alpha-hydroxy laxogenin, has not been studied in clinical trials, products labeled as containing either of these ingredients are often contaminated with prohibited compounds. Some products have been shown to contain potentially unsafe ingredients such as arimistane, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and testosterone phenylpropionate (99191).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally, intravenously, intratracheally, or by inhalation and appropriately. N-acetyl cysteine is an FDA-approved prescription drug (832,1539,1705,1710,2245,2246,2252,2253,2254,2256)(2258,2259,2260,5808,6176,6611,7868,10270,10271,16840)(91243,91247,102027,102660,102666,99531).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. N-acetyl cysteine has been safely used at doses of 900-2700 mg daily for 8-12 weeks (91235,91239,91241,102666). ...when used intravenously and appropriately. Intravenous N-acetyl cysteine 140 mg/kg/day plus oral N-acetyl cysteine 70 mg/kg four times daily for up to 10 months has been safely used (64547).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally, intratracheally, intravenously, or by inhalation. N-acetyl cysteine crosses the placenta, but has not been associated with adverse effects to the fetus (1711,64615,64493,97041). However, N-acetyl cysteine should only be used in pregnancy when clearly indicated, such as in cases of acetaminophen toxicity.

LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intramuscularly and appropriately. Vitamin D has been safely used in a wide range of doses (7555,16888,16891,17476,95913,98186,104619,105209,109059). When used orally long-term, doses should not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily for adults (17506,99773); however, much higher doses such as 50,000 IU (1250 mcg) weekly orally for 6-12 weeks are often needed for the short-term treatment of vitamin D deficiency (16891,17476). Monthly oral doses of up to 60,000 IU (1500 mcg) have also been safely used for up to 5 years (105726). Toxicity usually does not occur until plasma levels exceed 150 ng/mL (17476).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses, long-term. Taking doses greater than the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily for long periods can increase the risk of hypercalcemia (17506); however, much higher doses are often needed for short-term treatment of vitamin D deficiency. Toxicity typically occurs when levels exceed 150 ng/mL (17476).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. When used long-term, doses should not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 1000 IU (25 mcg) daily for those 0-6 months of age, 1500 IU (37.5 mcg) daily for those 6-12 months of age, 2500 IU (62.5 mcg) daily for those 1-3 years of age, 3000 IU (75 mcg) daily for those 4-8 years of age, and 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily for those 9 years and older (17506); however, much higher doses are often needed for the short-term treatment of vitamin D deficiency. Some research shows that giving vitamin D 14,000 IU (350 mcg) weekly for a year in children aged 10-17 years is safe (16875). A meta-analysis of clinical studies shows that 1000 IU (25 mcg) daily in those up to a year of age and greater than 2000 IU (50 mcg) daily in those aged 1-6 years does not increase the risk of serious adverse events (108424).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses for longer than one year. Taking doses greater than the tolerable upper intake level (UL) long-term can increase the risk of hypercalcemia (17506).

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Vitamin D is safe when used in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily (17506,95910).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive amounts. Tell patients not to use doses above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily. Hypercalcemia during pregnancy due to excessive vitamin D intake can lead to several fetal adverse effects, including suppression of parathyroid hormone, hypocalcemia, tetany, seizures, aortic valve stenosis, retinopathy, and mental and/or physical developmental delay (17506).

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Vitamin D is safe when used in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily (17506).

LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive amounts. Tell patients not to use doses above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily (17506).

ARIMISTANE - [FAST FACTS] (Androsta-3, 5-Diene-7, 17-Dione)

Interactions with Drugs view details

Below is general information about the interactions of the known ingredients contained in the product R-PCT. Some ingredients may not be listed. This information does NOT represent a recommendation for or a test of this specific product as a whole.

None known.

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = B

Theoretically, taking ashwagandha with antidiabetes drugs might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.

Details

There is preliminary clinical evidence suggesting that ashwagandha might lower blood glucose levels. Theoretically, ashwagandha might have additive effects when used with antidiabetes drugs and increase the risk of hypoglycemia (19274,90649,102685).

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, taking ashwagandha with antihypertensive drugs might increase the risk of hypotension.

Details

Animal research suggests that ashwagandha might lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure (19279). Theoretically, ashwagandha might have additive effects when used with antihypertensive drugs and increase the risk of hypotension.

BENZODIAZEPINES

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, taking ashwagandha might increase the sedative effects of benzodiazepines.

Details

There is preliminary evidence that ashwagandha might have an additive effect with diazepam (Valium) and clonazepam (Klonopin) (3710). This may also occur with other benzodiazepines.

CNS DEPRESSANTS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, taking ashwagandha might increase the sedative effects of CNS depressants.

Details

Ashwagandha seems to have sedative effects. Theoretically, this may potentiate the effects of barbiturates, other sedatives, and anxiolytics (3710).

IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, taking ashwagandha might decrease the effects of immunosuppressants.

Details

Ashwagandha has demonstrated immunostimulant effects in humans (3710,3711,4114,11301,106786). Animal research has shown that ashwagandha can attenuate the immunosuppression caused by cyclophosphamide (3711,4114).

THYROID HORMONE

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = B

Ashwagandha might increase the effects and adverse effects of thyroid hormone.

Details

Concomitant use of ashwagandha with thyroid hormones may cause additive therapeutic and adverse effects. Preliminary clinical research and animal studies suggest that ashwagandha boosts thyroid hormone synthesis and secretion (19281,19282,97292). In one clinical study, ashwagandha increased triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) levels by 41.5% and 19.6%, respectively, and reduced serum TSH levels by 17.4% from baseline in adults with subclinical hypothyroidism (97292).

AMOXICILLIN (Amoxil, Trimox)

Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination.

Severity = Mild • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, black pepper might increase the effects and side effects of amoxicillin.

Details

Animal research shows that taking piperine, a constituent of black pepper, with amoxicillin increases plasma levels of amoxicillin (29269). This has not been reported in humans.

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, black pepper might increase the risk of bleeding when taken with antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs.

Details

In vitro research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, seems to inhibit platelet aggregation (29206). This has not been reported in humans.

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, black pepper might increase the risk of hypoglycemia when taken with antidiabetes drugs.

Details

Animal research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, can reduce blood glucose levels (29225). Monitor blood glucose levels closely. Dose adjustments might be necessary.

ATORVASTATIN (Lipitor)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, black pepper might increase blood levels of atorvastatin.

Details

Animal research shows that taking piperine, a constituent of black pepper, 35 mg/kg can increase the maximum serum concentration of atorvastatin three-fold (104188). This has not been reported in humans.

CARBAMAZEPINE (Tegretol)

Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination.

Severity = Mild • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = B

Theoretically, black pepper might increase blood levels of carbamazepine, potentially increasing the effects and side effects of carbamazepine.

Details

One clinical study in patients taking carbamazepine 300 mg or 500 mg twice daily shows that taking a single 20 mg dose of purified piperine, a constituent of black pepper, increases carbamazepine levels. Piperine may increase carbamazepine absorption by increasing blood flow to the GI tract, increasing the surface area of the small intestine, or inhibiting cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) in the gut wall. Absorption was significantly increased by 7-10 mcg/mL/hour. The time to eliminate carbamazepine was also increased by 4-8 hours. Although carbamazepine levels were increased, this did not appear to increase side effects (16833). In vitro research also shows that piperine can increase carbamazepine levels by 11% in a time-dependent manner (103819).

CYCLOSPORINE (Neoral, Sandimmune)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, black pepper might increase the effects and side effects of cyclosporine.

Details

In vitro research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, increases the bioavailability of cyclosporine (29282). This has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) SUBSTRATES

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, black pepper might increase levels of drugs metabolized by CYP1A1.

Details

In vitro research suggests that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, inhibits CYP1A1 (29213). This has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 2B1 (CYP2B1) SUBSTRATES

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, black pepper might increase levels of drugs metabolized by CYP2B1.

Details

In vitro research suggests that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, inhibits CYP2B1 (29332). This has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) SUBSTRATES

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, black pepper might increase levels of drugs metabolized by CYP2D6.

Details

In vitro research suggests that some constituents of black pepper inhibit CYP2D6 (29207,29212,38375). This has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, black pepper might increase levels of drugs metabolized by CYP3A4.

Details

In vitro research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, as well as the pepper fruit seem to inhibit CYP3A4 (14375,29212). This has not been reported in humans.

LITHIUM

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, black pepper might increase blood levels of lithium due to its diuretic effects. The dose of lithium might need to be reduced.

Details

Black pepper is thought to have diuretic properties (11).

NEVIRAPINE (Viramune)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Mild • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = D

Black pepper might increase blood levels of nevirapine.

Details

Clinical research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, increases the plasma concentration of nevirapine. However, no adverse effects were observed in this study (29209).

P-GLYCOPROTEIN SUBSTRATES

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, black pepper might increase levels of P-glycoprotein substrates.

Details

In vitro research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, seems to inhibit P-glycoprotein (14375,29281,29283).

PENTOBARBITAL (Nembutal)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, black pepper might increase the sedative effects of pentobarbital.

Details

Animal research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, increases pentobarbital-induced sleeping time (29214).

PHENYTOIN (Dilantin)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = B

Black pepper might increase blood levels of phenytoin.

Details

Clinical research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, seems to increase absorption, slow elimination, and increase levels of phenytoin (537,14442). Taking a single dose of black pepper 1 gram along with phenytoin seems to double the serum concentration of phenytoin (14375). Consuming a soup with black pepper providing piperine 44 mg/200 mL of soup along with phenytoin also seems to increase phenytoin levels when compared with consuming the same soup without black pepper (14442).

PROPRANOLOL (Inderal)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = B

Black pepper might increase blood levels of propranolol.

Details

Clinical research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, seems to increase absorption and slow elimination of propranolol (538).

RIFAMPIN (Rifadin)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = B

Black pepper might increase blood levels of rifampin.

Details

Clinical research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, seems to increase absorption and serum levels of rifampin (14375,29284).

THEOPHYLLINE

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Black pepper might increase blood levels of theophylline.

Details

Clinical research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, seems to increase absorption and slow elimination of theophylline (538).

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

There is some evidence forskolin, a constituent of coleus, can inhibit platelet aggregation and adhesion (7410,7411,7412). Theoretically, concomitant use of coleus and anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs might increase the risk of bruising and bleeding. Some anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs include abciximab (ReoPro), anagrelide (Agrylin), antithrombin III (Thrombate III), ardeparin (Normiflo), cilostazol (Pletal), clopidogrel (Plavix), dalteparin (Fragmin), danaparoid (Orgaran), dicumarol, dipyridamole (Persantine), enoxaparin (Lovenox), eptifibatide (Integrilin), heparin, lepirudin (Refludan), tirofiban (Aggrastat), and warfarin (Coumadin).

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Animal research shows that forskolin, a constituent of coleus, may lower blood pressure (7278,7279,44424,44431). Theoretically, combining coleus with antihypertensive drugs might cause additive blood pressure lowering effects and increase the risk of hypotension. Some antihypertensive drugs include captopril (Capoten), enalapril (Vasotec), losartan (Cozaar), valsartan (Diovan), diltiazem (Cardizem), Amlodipine (Norvasc), hydrochlorothiazide (HydroDIURIL), furosemide (Lasix), and many others.

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS

Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = B

Using forskolin, a constituent of coleus, with calcium channel blockers such as verapamil (Calan, Covera-HS, Verelan), nifedipine (Procardia), and diltiazem (Cardizem, Dilacor, Tiazac) might cause additive coronary vasodilatory effects (7278,7279).

CYTOCHROME P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) SUBSTRATES

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Research on the effect of coleus on cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) is conflicting. Some animal research shows that coleus extract can induce CYP2C9, while in vitro research shows that coleus can inhibit CYP2C9 (91891). Theoretically, taking coleus with drugs metabolized by CYP2C9 might affect drug levels and the risk of adverse effects. Until more is known, advise patients that taking coleus might increase or decrease levels of drugs metabolized by CYP2C9.

Details

Some drugs metabolized by CYP2C9 include celecoxib (Celebrex), diclofenac (Voltaren), fluvastatin (Lescol), glipizide (Glucotrol), ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin), irbesartan (Avapro), losartan (Cozaar), phenytoin (Dilantin), piroxicam (Feldene), tamoxifen (Nolvadex), tolbutamide (Tolinase), torsemide (Demadex), and S-warfarin (Coumadin).

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

In vitro research shows that coleus can activate the nuclear receptor, pregnane X receptor (PXR), which results in increased expression of CYP3A4 (44399,44412). Theoretically, coleus might induce CYP3A4 and decrease levels of drugs metabolized by this enzyme. Although the clinical significance of this is not known, use caution when considering concomitant use of coleus and other drugs affected by these enzymes. Drugs that might be affected include some calcium channel blockers (diltiazem, nicardipine, verapamil), chemotherapeutic agents (etoposide, paclitaxel, vinblastine, vincristine, vindesine), antifungals (ketoconazole, itraconazole), glucocorticoids, cisapride (Propulsid), alfentanil (Alfenta), fentanyl (Sublimaze), losartan (Cozaar), fluoxetine (Prozac), midazolam (Versed), omeprazole (Prilosec), ondansetron (Zofran), propranolol (Inderal), fexofenadine (Allegra), and numerous others.

NITRATES

Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = B

Using forskolin, a constituent of coleus, with nitrates such as nitroglycerin (Nitro-Bid, Nitro-Dur, Nitrostat) and isosorbide (Imdur, Isordil, Sorbitrate) might cause additive coronary vasodilatory effects (7278,7279,44424).

WARFARIN (Coumadin)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Preliminary research assessing the effect of coleus on warfarin metabolism is conflicting. Animal research shows that coleus extract induces cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) enzymes and increases metabolism of warfarin; however, in vitro research shows that coleus inhibits CYP2C9 enzymes and might reduce warfarin metabolism (91891). Until more is known, advise patients to use coleus cautiously or avoid it if they taking warfarin.

ANESTHESIA

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, concomitant use of cowhage and anesthesia might increase the risk of arrhythmias.

Details

Cowhage contains levodopa (7020,7205,46334,46336,94723,94724). Use of levodopa with cyclopropane or halogenated hydrocarbon anesthesia has led to arrhythmias. Other anesthetics have not been implicated (15). Use other anesthetics in patients taking cowhage or tell patients to stop taking cowhage at least 2 weeks before surgery.

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, concomitant use of cowhage and antidiabetes drugs might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.

Details

Animal research shows that cowhage might have hypoglycemic effects (7221).

ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, use of cowhage might decrease the clinical effects of antipsychotic drugs.

Details

Cowhage contains levodopa (7020,7205,46334,46336,94723,94724). Use of levodopa might counteract the antidopaminergic effects of antipsychotic medications (15).

GUANETHIDINE (Ismelin)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, concomitant use of cowhage and guanethidine might increase the risk of hypotension.

Details

Cowhage contains levodopa (7020,7205,46334,46336,94723,94724). Use of levodopa with guanethidine might cause additive hypotension (15); avoid using.

LEVODOPA

Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Likely • Level of Evidence = D

Concomitant use can increase the risk of levodopa-related adverse effects.

Details

Cowhage contains levodopa. Some cowhage products have been standardized to contain 75-400 mg of levodopa per dose (7020,7205,46334,46336,94723,94724).

METHYLDOPA (Aldomet)

Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, concomitant use of cowhage and methyldopa might increase the risk of hypotension.

Details

Cowhage contains levodopa (7020,7205,46334,46336,94723,94724). Use of levodopa with methyldopa might cause additive hypotension. In addition, methyldopa may inhibit peripheral decarboxylation of levodopa and increase levodopa levels in the central nervous system (15); avoid using.

MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITORS (MAOIs)

Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, concomitant use of cowhage and non-selective MAOIs might increase the risk of hypertensive crisis.

Details

Cowhage contains levodopa (7020,7205,46334,46336,94723,94724). Use of levodopa with non-selective MAOIs might cause hypertensive crisis. However, this interaction has not been reported with MAO-B selective inhibitors such as selegiline (15).

TRICYCLIC ANTIDEPRESSANTS (TCAs)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, use of TCAs might reduce the levels and clinical effects of cowhage.

Details

Cowhage contains levodopa (7020,7205,46334,46336,94723,94724). Use of TCAs might reduce the absorption of levodopa. Some case reports describe patients that developed hypertension and dyskinesia when taking both levodopa and TCAs (15).

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) SUBSTRATES

Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Unlikely • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, diindolylmethane might lower serum levels of CYP1A2 substrates.

Details

In vitro evidence suggests that diindolylmethane can induce CYP1A2 (7667,47745). Theoretically, it might increase metabolism of CYP1A2 substrates and lower serum concentrations. This interaction has not been reported in humans.

DIURETIC DRUGS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = B

Theoretically, diindolylmethane might increase the risk of hyponatremia if used with sodium-depleting diuretics.

Details

Large doses of diindolylmethane (600 mg daily) have been associated with two cases of asymptomatic hyponatremia in clinical research (47729).

ESTROGENS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, diindolylmethane might increase or decrease the effects of estrogens.

Details

Diindolylmethane might have mild estrogenic or antiestrogenic effects (7664). Theoretically, large amounts of diindolylmethane might interfere with hormone replacement therapy.

None known.

ACTIVATED CHARCOAL

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

N-acetyl cysteine might reduce the effects of activated charcoal, while activated charcoal might reduce the absorption of N-acetyl cysteine.

Details

N-acetyl cysteine appears to reduce the capacity of activated charcoal to adsorb acetaminophen and salicylic acid (7869). Conversely, although clinical research suggests that although activated charcoal can reduce the absorption of N-acetyl cysteine by up to 40%, it does not seem to reduce its clinical effects (1755,22774,22775,64501,64647). Other clinical evidence suggests that activated charcoal does not affect the absorption of N-acetyl cysteine (22776,22777).

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, N-acetyl cysteine might increase the risk of bleeding when taken with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.

Details

Clinical research suggests that intravenous N-acetyl cysteine decreases prothrombin time, prolongs coagulation time, decreases platelet aggregation, and increases blood loss in surgical patients (64511,64644). Furthermore, in vitro research suggests that N-acetyl cysteine increases the anticoagulant activity of nitroglycerin (22780,64780).

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, N-acetyl cysteine might increase the risk of hypotension when taken with antihypertensive drugs.

Details

Animal research suggests that N-acetyl cysteine potentiates the hypotensive effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) captopril and enalaprilat (22785). Theoretically, combining N-acetyl cysteine with other antihypertensive drugs might increase the risk of hypotension.

CHLOROQUINE (Aralen)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, N-acetyl cysteine might interfere with the antimalarial effects of chloroquine.

Details

Animal research suggests that N-acetyl cysteine might reduce the antimalarial effects of chloroquine by increasing cellular levels of glutathione (22786).

NITROGLYCERIN

Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = B

N-acetyl cysteine can increase the risk for hypotension and headaches when taken with intravenous or transdermal nitroglycerin.

Details

Clinical research shows that concomitant administration of N-acetyl cysteine and intravenous or transdermal nitroglycerin can cause severe hypotension (2246) and intolerable headaches (2245,2280). Furthermore, in vitro research suggests that N-acetyl cysteine increases the anticoagulant activity of nitroglycerin (22780,64780).

ALUMINUM

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Mild • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = B

Vitamin D might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity, but this has only been reported in people with renal failure.

Details

The protein that transports calcium across the intestinal wall can also bind and transport aluminum. This protein is stimulated by vitamin D, which may therefore increase aluminum absorption (11595,11597,22916). This mechanism may contribute to increased aluminum levels and toxicity in people with renal failure, when they take vitamin D and aluminum-containing phosphate binders chronically (11529,11596,11597).

ATORVASTATIN (Lipitor)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Mild • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = B

Vitamin D might reduce absorption of atorvastatin.

Details

A small, low-quality clinical study shows that taking vitamin D reduces levels of atorvastatin and its active metabolites by up to 55%. However, while atorvastatin levels decreased, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels did not substantially change (16828). Atorvastatin is metabolized in the gut by CYP3A4 enzymes, and researchers theorized that vitamin D might induce CYP3A4, causing reduced levels of atorvastatin. However, this proposed mechanism was not specifically studied.

CALCIPOTRIENE (Dovonex)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = D

Taking calcipotriene with vitamin D increases the risk for hypercalcemia.

Details

Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (15). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with vitamin D supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES

Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination.

Severity = Mild • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Vitamin D might induce CYP3A4 enzymes and reduce the bioavailability of CYP3A4 substrates.

Details

There is some concern that vitamin D might induce CYP3A4. In vitro research suggests that vitamin D induces CYP3A4 transcription. Additionally, observational research has found that increased UV light exposure and serum vitamin D levels are associated with decreased serum levels of CYP3A4 substrates such as tacrolimus and sirolimus, while no association between UV light exposure or vitamin D levels and levels of mycophenolic acid, a non-CYP3A4 substrate, was found (110539). A small, low-quality clinical study shows that taking vitamin D reduces levels of the CYP3A4 substrate atorvastatin and its active metabolites by up to 55%; however, the clinical effects of atorvastatin were not reduced (16828). While researchers theorized that vitamin D might induce CYP3A4, this proposed mechanism was not specifically studied.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, hypercalcemia induced by high-dose vitamin D can increase the risk of arrhythmia from digoxin.

Details

High doses of vitamin D can cause hypercalcemia. Hypercalcemia increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with digoxin (15). Avoid vitamin D doses above the tolerable upper intake level (4000 IU daily for adults) and monitor serum calcium levels in people taking vitamin D and digoxin concurrently.

DILTIAZEM (Cardizem, others)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = B

Theoretically, hypercalcemia induced by high-dose vitamin D can reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem for arrhythmia.

Details

High doses of vitamin D can cause hypercalcemia. Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically this could also occur with diltiazem. Avoid vitamin D doses above the tolerable upper intake level (4000 IU daily for adults) and monitor serum calcium levels in people taking vitamin D and diltiazem concurrently.

THIAZIDE DIURETICS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, taking thiazide diuretics and high-dose vitamin D can increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

Details

Thiazide diuretics decrease urinary calcium excretion, which could lead to hypercalcemia if vitamin D supplements are taken concurrently (3072,11541,69580). This has been reported in people being treated with vitamin D for hypoparathyroidism, and also in elderly people with normal parathyroid function who were taking a thiazide, vitamin D, and calcium-containing antacids daily (11539,11540).

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = B

Hypercalcemia induced by high-dose vitamin D can reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil for arrhythmia.

Details

Hypercalcemia due to high doses of vitamin D can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Avoid vitamin D doses above the tolerable upper intake level (4000 IU daily for adults) and monitor serum calcium levels in people taking vitamin D and verapamil concurrently.

Report an Adverse Reaction to R-PCT

Adverse Effects view details

Below is general information about the adverse effects of the known ingredients contained in the product R-PCT. Some ingredients may not be listed. This information does NOT represent a recommendation for or a test of this specific product as a whole.

ARIMISTANE - [FAST FACTS] (Androsta-3, 5-Diene-7, 17-Dione)

...

General ...Orally, ashwagandha seems to be well-tolerated. Topically, no adverse effects have been reported. However, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Diarrhea, gastrointestinal upset, nausea, and vomiting. However, these adverse effects do not commonly occur with typical doses.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Some case reports raise concerns about acute liver failure, hepatic encephalopathy, and the need for liver transplantation with ashwagandha treatment.

Dermatologic ...Orally, dermatitis has been reported in three of 42 patients in a clinical trial (19276).

Endocrine ...A case report describes a 73-year-old female who had taken an ashwagandha root extract (unspecified dose) for 2 years to treat hypothyroidism which had been previously managed with levothyroxine. The patient was diagnosed with hyperthyroidism after presenting with supraventricular tachycardia, chest pain, tremor, dizziness, fatigue, irritability, hair thinning, and low thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels. Hyperthyroidism resolved after discontinuing ashwagandha (108745).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, large doses may cause gastrointestinal upset, diarrhea, and vomiting secondary to irritation of the mucous and serous membranes (3710). When taken orally, nausea and abdominal pain (19276,110490) and gastritis and flatulence (90651) have been reported.

Genitourinary ...In one case report, a 28-year-old male with a decrease in libido who was taking ashwagandha 5 grams daily over 10 days subsequently experienced burning, itching, and skin and mucous membrane discoloration of the penis, as well as an oval, dusky, eroded plaque (3 cm) with erythema on the glans penis and prepuce (32537).

Hepatic ...Orally, ashwagandha in doses of 154-1350 mg daily has played a role in several case reports of liver injury. In most of these cases, other causes of liver injury were excluded, and liver failure did not occur. Symptoms included jaundice, pruritus, malaise, fatigue, lethargy, weight loss, nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, stool discoloration, and dark urine. Symptom onset was typically 5-180 days from first intake, although in some cases onset occurred after more than 12 months of use (102686,107372,110490,110491,111533,111535,112111). Laboratory findings include elevated aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, and serum bilirubin (112111). In most cases, liver enzymes normalized within 1-5 months after discontinuation of ashwagandha (102686,107372,110491,111535,112111). However, treatment with corticosteroids, lactulose, ornithine, ursodeoxycholic acid, and plasmapheresis, among other interventions, was required in one case (111533). Rarely, use of oral ashwagandha has been reported to cause hepatic encephalopathy and liver failure requiring liver transplantation (110490).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, ashwagandha has been reported to cause drowsiness (110492). Headache, neck pain, and blurry vision have been reported in a 47-year-old female taking ashwagandha, cannabis, and venlafaxine. Imaging over the course of multiple years and hospital admissions indicated numerous instances of intracranial hemorrhage and multifocal stenosis of intracranial arteries, likely secondary to reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) (112113). It is unclear whether the RCVS and subsequent intracranial hemorrhages were precipitated by ashwagandha, cannabis, or venlafaxine.

General ...Orally, black pepper seems to be well tolerated when used in the amounts found in food or when taken as a medicine as a single dose. Topically and as aromatherapy, black pepper oil seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Burning aftertaste, dyspepsia, and reduced taste perception.
Inhalation: Cough.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Allergic reaction in sensitive individuals.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, black pepper can cause a burning aftertaste (5619) and dyspepsia (38061). Single and repeated application of piperine, the active constituent in black pepper, to the tongue and oral cavity can decrease taste perception (29267). By intragastric route, black pepper 1.5 grams has been reported to cause gastrointestinal microbleeds (29164). It is not clear if such an effect would occur with oral administration.

Immunologic ...In one case report, a 17-month-old male developed hives, red eyes, facial swelling, and a severe cough following consumption of a sauce containing multiple ingredients. Allergen skin tests were positive to both black pepper and cayenne, which were found in the sauce (93947).

Ocular/Otic ...Topically, ground black pepper can cause redness of the eyes and swelling of the eyelids (5619).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...When inhaled through the nose as an olfactory stimulant, black pepper oil has been reported to cause cough in one clinical trial (29162).

General ...Orally, intravenously, ophthalmologically, and by inhalation, coleus seems to be well tolerated (7278,7279,7282,7283,7284). Orally, coleus extract may cause dose-related gastrointestinal effects, including diarrhea, loose stools, nausea, vomiting, or constipation (91885,100851). Intravenously, the coleus constituent, forskolin, can cause tachycardia, flushing, and hypotension (7279,44424,44431). Inhalation of forskolin may cause tremor, restlessness, and irritation of the respiratory tract (7281). Ophthalmologically, forskolin may cause stinging of the eyes and conjunctival hyperemia (7283).

Cardiovascular ...Intravenously, the coleus constituent, forskolin, can cause tachycardia, flushing and hypotension (7279,44424,44431).

Dermatologic ...Two cases of contact dermatitis have been reported following airborne exposure to coleus (44426,44418).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, coleus can cause dose-related diarrhea and other gastrointestinal symptoms. Increased bowel movements and loose stools have been reported in 1 of 15 patients taking coleus extract in a clinical trial (91885). Some retrospective evidence reports about a 10% rate of gastrointestinal adverse effects from oral coleus use; 81% of these adverse effects were related to diarrhea. Other reported adverse effects which occurred at a much lower rate, include nausea, vomiting, and/or constipation. Gastrointestinal effects appear to be dose-related; those taking less than 250 mg of coleus extract did not report any diarrhea, while all patients taking 1000 mg of coleus extract reported diarrhea (100851).

Neurologic/CNS ...Inhalation of forskolin, a constituent of coleus, can cause tremor and restlessness (7281).

Ocular/Otic ...Ophthalmologically, forskolin, a constituent of coleus, can cause stinging of the eyes and conjunctival hyperemia (7283).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Inhalation of forskolin, a constituent of coleus, can cause throat and upper respiratory tract irritation, and mild to moderate cough (7281).

General ...Orally, adverse effects to cowhage seem to be rare; however, a thorough safety evaluation has not been conducted. Topically, cowhage bean pod or seed may be unsafe.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Diarrhea, flatulence, mucosal irritation.
Topically: Erythema, pruritus, rash.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, cowhage has been reported to cause palpitations (7021,7203)

Dermatologic ...Orally, ingestion of hairs from the bean pod or seed can result in significant mucosal irritation and should be avoided.
Topically, hairs on cowhage bean pod or seed can cause severe pruritus (6898). Symptoms include severe itching, burning, inflammation, and erythematous macular rashes (18,6898). Symptoms resolve spontaneously within several hours, but may also be relieved with antihistamines (6898). The hairs can be removed from the skin by washing, but the hairs can also be retained, and transferred to other people, in fabrics and carpets. Clothing and other materials that come in contact with cowhage hairs should also be thoroughly washed (6898).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, cowhage has been reported to cause flatulence, diarrhea, and dry mouth (7021,7203). Orally, a specific powdered cowhage seed extract (Zandopa, formerly HP-200; Zandu Pharmaceuticals) has been reported to cause nausea, abdominal distention, and vomiting in clinical research when taken in amounts of 22.5-67.5 grams divided into 2-5 doses per day (7020).

Musculoskeletal ...Orally, dyskinesia has been reported in clinical research in about 3% of patients taking a specific powdered cowhage seed extract (Zandopa, formerly HP-200; Zandu Pharmaceuticals) 22. 5-67.5 grams divided into 2-5 doses daily (7020).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, cowhage has been reported to cause headaches (7021,7203). Orally, insomnia has been reported in clinical research in about 3% of patients taking a specific powdered cowhage seed extract (Zandopa, formerly HP-200; Zandu Pharmaceuticals) 22.5 grams to 67.5 grams divided into 2-5 doses daily (7020).

Psychiatric ...In a case report, cowhage caused an outbreak of acute toxic psychosis. Symptoms of psychosis included confusion, giddiness, agitation, hallucinations, and paranoid delusions. The cowhage-induced psychosis was successfully treated with intravenous chlorpromazine (7021).

Other ...Orally, cowhage has been reported to cause sweating and changes in urine color, (7021,7203). Theoretically, due to the levodopa constituent, cowhage is likely to cause the same adverse effects that have been attributed to purified, prescription levodopa. Some of these side effects include elevated liver enzymes, respiratory disturbances, urinary retention, muscle cramps, and priapism (15). However, these effects have not yet been reported for cowhage.

General ...Orally, diindolylmethane is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Diarrhea, gas, headache, nausea, rash, and vomiting.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS).

Dermatologic ...Orally, diindolylmethane can cause rash (47615,93836). In one case report, a patient developed drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) after consuming a product containing diindolylmethane, vitamin E, and broccoli powder. An allergen patch test was positive for diindolylmethane (93840).

Endocrine ...Orally, diindolylmethane was associated with grade 3 asymptomatic hyponatremia in 2 of 4 patients taking 600 mg daily for 28 days in one clinical study. Hyponatremia was not seen in the 8 patients taking diindolylmethane 150-450 mg daily (47729).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, diindolylmethane can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and gas (47652,47676,47709,47729,93836).

Genitourinary ...Orally, diindolylmethane can cause the urine to darken (93836).

Hematologic ...In one case report, a 65-year-old male developed a deep vein thromboembolism (DVT) and bilateral pulmonary emboli (PE) within a few weeks of initiating treatment with diindolylmethane. It is unclear if diindolylmethane contributed to this event; the patient was at increased risk for emboli due to his age, weight, tobacco use, and possible history of pulmonary embolism (93835).

Hepatic ...In one case report, a patient developed drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), involving elevated liver transaminases, after consuming a product containing diindolylmethane, vitamin E, and broccoli powder. An allergen patch test was positive for diindolylmethane (93840).

Immunologic ...In one case report, a patient developed drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) after consuming a product containing diindolylmethane, vitamin E, and broccoli powder. The patient developed fever, activated lymphocytes, and swollen lymph nodes. An allergen patch test was positive for diindolylmethane (93840).

Musculoskeletal ...Orally, diindolylmethane has been reported to cause arthralgias (47615).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, diindolylmethane can cause headache (47652,47676,93836). One case has reported ischemic stroke in a 38-year-old female with a history of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), traumatic subdural hematoma, right partial hemicraniectomy, and use of several supplements, including 200 mg of diindolylmethane daily, vitamin D3, vitamin K2, elderberry, caffeine, and possibly cannabis (112895). It is unclear if diindolylmethane contributed to this event; the patient was at increased risk for stroke due to PFO and other factors.

General ...There is currently a limited amount of information available about the adverse effects of laxogenin. Products labeled as containing laxogenin or 5-alpha-hydroxy laxogenin might contain contaminants, including prohibited compounds (99191).

General ...Orally, intravenously, and as an inhalation, N-acetyl cysteine is generally well-tolerated when used in typical doses. Most adverse effects to N-acetyl cysteine occur when single doses of greater than 9 grams are used or when a regimen of greater than 30 grams daily is followed.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Diarrhea, dry mouth, dyspepsia, heartburn, loss of appetite, nausea, and vomiting.
Intravenously: Skin rash and hypersensitivity reactions.
Inhaled: Bronchospasm, cough, epigastric pain, throat irritation, and wheezing.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Chest tightness, hemoptysis, and palpitations have been reported.
Intravenously: Anaphylaxis, angina, dystonic reactions, tachycardia, and transient sinus bradycardia have been reported.

Cardiovascular ...Intravenously, N-acetyl cysteine has been reported to significantly increase systolic and diastolic blood pressure after exposure to nitroglycerin when compared with placebo (2280). Tachycardia, chest pain, angina, and transient sinus bradycardia have been rarely reported after administration of intravenous N-acetyl cysteine (2280,7872,64658).
Intratracheally, infants receiving 5% N-acetyl cysteine every four hours for chronic lung disease have developed bradycardia (64490).
Orally, palpitations and chest tightness have been reported rarely in clinical research evaluating oral N-acetyl cysteine at doses up to 600 mg twice daily (64675,64717,64762).

Dermatologic ...Orally, N-acetyl cysteine may cause hives (64713,64739,64813), flushing (2260,64715), and edema (64714). Rash has also been reported (64510,64715,64717,102656). In one study, flushing was reported in 2% of patients receiving 600 mg of N-acetyl cysteine orally twice daily for six months (2260).
Intravenously, N-acetyl cysteine may cause rash, and the occurrence seems to be more common than with oral use (2254,64492,64562,64658,64759,64794). Hives (2280,64794), facial edema (2280), flushing (64412), and pruritus (64658,64763) have also been reported. In a small case series of 10 healthy male patients receiving 150 mg/kg of intravenous N-acetyl cysteine for muscle fatigue, erythema was experienced 30 minutes after infusion. Other side effects reported by these patients include facial erythema, palmar erythema, and sweating (64763). In other clinical research, three patients developed an erythematous flare at the sites of previous venipunctures after receiving 5.5 gm/m2 of N-acetyl cysteine with doxorubicin therapy (64712). Pain, inflammation, and excoriation of the skin have been reported after a 20% N-acetyl cysteine solution leaked from the catheter in one patient (64726).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, gastrointestinal complaints are the most common adverse effects reported with N-acetyl cysteine. These include heartburn (64608,64715,64717,64738,64739,102666), dyspepsia (1710,64715,64717,64724,64738), and epigastric pain (2260,10429,64715,64717). In one case report, esophagitis related to ulcerations occurred following intake of N-acetyl cysteine while in the supine position with inadequate water (102655). Other common side effects include loss of appetite (64715,64812), flatulence (2256,64510), diarrhea (64713,64715,97049), constipation (64715), dry mouth (64715,64724), nausea (7868,11430,64715,64724,64738,64812,97049), vomiting (64717,64724,64715,97049), gastric upset (64510,64545,97045,97049), acid reflux (108450), changes in bowel habits (108450), and intolerance to taste and odor (64510,64545). N-acetyl cysteine's unpleasant odor makes it difficult for some patients to take orally. Using a straw to drink N-acetyl cysteine solutions can improve tolerability. Additionally, placement of a nasogastric or duodenal tube and administration of metoclopramide or ondansetron can be helpful for patients unable to tolerate oral N-acetyl cysteine (17).
Intravenously, N-acetyl cysteine may cause diarrhea (64712), dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting (64763), mild gastrointestinal upset (102657), and metallic taste (64763).
When inhaled, N-acetyl cysteine may cause epigastric pain and throat irritation (64703,64707,64674).

Genitourinary ...Orally, dysuria was reported in 2% of patients receiving 600 mg of N-acetyl cysteine twice daily for 6 months in one clinical trial (2260).

Hematologic ...In general, hematologic adverse reactions are reported more frequently with intravenous N-acetyl cysteine compared with oral use. In surgical patients, decreased prothrombin time (1341,64511), prolonged coagulation time (64511), increased blood loss (64511,64644), and decreased platelet aggregation (64511) have been reported after administration of IV N-acetyl cysteine. In one clinical trial, six healthy patients were administered a loading dose of IV N-acetyl cysteine 10 mg/kg followed by 10 mg/kg per hour for 32 hours. All patients experienced a decrease in prothrombin time by 30% to 40%. The decrease prothrombin time (25.4 sec to 20.6 sec) reached a steady state after 16 hours (1341). In a clinical trial evaluating patients with acute myocardial infarction, hemorrhage occurred in three patients taking intravenous N-acetyl cysteine 10 mg/min, heparin (per study protocol), and aspirin (7872). Two pediatric patients receiving intravenous N-acetyl cysteine (loading dose: 140 mg/kg followed by 70 mg/kg) experienced episodes of coagulopathy; however, patients were being treated for acetaminophen overdose (64794).
Hemoptysis was reported in six patients receiving 200 mg of N-acetyl cysteine orally twice daily for 6 months for treatment of chronic bronchitis (64739).

Immunologic ...Orally, anaphylaxis to N-acetyl cysteine has been rarely reported (64794). However, anaphylactic reactions to intravenous N-acetyl cysteine appear to be more common (1716,64412,64449,64628,64710,64711,64721,64786,64789).
Anaphylactic reactions to N-acetyl cysteine have involved rash, angioedema, hypotension, and bronchospasm (64449,64711,64720). The mechanism of this reaction is unclear, but some data suggest it is not an immunologic hypersensitivity reaction but rather an acute toxic effect of N-acetyl cysteine (64786,64641,64720). Management guidelines for the treatment of anaphylactoid reactions to intravenous N-acetyl cysteine have been published. In most cases, treatment is not required or treatment with diphenhydramine or salbutamol is sufficient to continue or restart N-acetyl cysteine infusion. Antihistamines are useful in controlling and preventing recurrence of anaphylactoid symptoms (1716).

Musculoskeletal ...In one clinical trial, joint pain was reported in more than 15% of patients receiving oral N-acetyl cysteine (64608). In other research, one patient experienced pain in the legs while taking 600 mg of N-acetyl cysteine twice daily for the treatment of chronic bronchitis (64762).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, headache has been frequently reported with N-acetyl cysteine in clinical research (7873,11430,64510,64608,64672,64713,64715,64724,64762). Other less common adverse effects reported in patients taking oral N-acetyl cysteine at a total daily dose of 600-1200 mg include dizziness (64715,64717,64724,64762), tiredness (64675,64717), vivid dreams (102666), disorientation, and inability to concentrate (64673). One pediatric patient receiving oral N-acetyl cysteine (loading dose: 140 mg/kg followed by 70 mg/kg) experienced encephalopathy (64794).
Intravenously, N-acetyl cysteine has been associated with rare neurologic adverse reactions , including headache (7872), lightheadedness (64763), and dystonic reactions (64794). In a previously healthy 2-year-old female, status epilepticus occurred during intravenous N-acetyl cysteine therapy for paracetamol ingestion (64781). Increased deterioration in bulbar function in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis has also been reported with IV N-acetyl cysteine (2254).

Ocular/Otic ...While rare, blurred vision has been reported in research on oral N-acetyl cysteine (64715). Additionally, in a previously healthy 2-year-old female, status epilepticus followed by cortical blindness occurred during intravenous N-acetyl cysteine therapy for paracetamol ingestion. In this case, vision was almost completely recovered 18-months later (64781).

Psychiatric ...Intravenously, dysphoria was experienced 30 minutes after infusion of N-acetyl cysteine in 8 of 10 healthy males assessed in one clinical study (64763).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Respiratory adverse reactions to N-acetyl cysteine are most commonly reported with inhalable dosage forms. These include wheezing (64455,64707), bronchospasm (64455,64699), and cough (64455,64456,64703,64811). While less frequent, wheezing (64675), bronchospasm (64675), increased sputum production (7868), cough (7868,64510), decreased peak flow (64510), dyspnea (64714), and cold symptoms (64510) have been reported with oral N-acetyl cysteine in clinical research. A few cases of wheezing (64718,64719), cough (64763), and bronchospasm (64658) have also been reported with intravenous N-acetyl cysteine. Additionally, respiratory arrest has been reported in one case where a 16 year-old female was being treated for acetaminophen toxicity with intravenous N-acetyl cysteine (64450).
Two premature infants receiving 5% N-acetyl cysteine via intratracheal instillation for the treatment of chronic lung disease had an increased frequency of cyanotic spells (64490).

Other ...Injection site reactions, including burning and phlebitis, have been reported in patients receiving IV N-acetyl cysteine (1341,64763). Fever associated with IV N-acetyl cysteine was reported in one patient during clinical research (64759).

General ...Orally or intramuscularly, vitamin D is well tolerated.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally or intramuscularly: Excessive doses can lead to vitamin D toxicity with symptoms of hypercalcemia, and also sometimes azotemia and anemia.

Cardiovascular ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses. Rarely, people develop hypertension (10142). An analysis of clinical research suggests that, when taken orally, vitamin D might modestly increase levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol. However, it is not clear if this increase is clinically significant (84642).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, vitamin D may cause dry mouth. In clinical research, intake of vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 4 weeks followed by 50,000 IU monthly for 5 months thereafter was associated with a 3.7-fold increase in reports of dry mouth compared with placebo (91348).Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses. Symptoms of vitamin D toxicity include pancreatitis (10142,84433). Vomiting occurred in one patient given a single dose of 200,000 IU (104624).

Genitourinary ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses. Advanced symptoms may include decreased libido (10142). Vaginal discharge and itching have been reported in a clinical trial following oral use (91348).

Hematologic ...Lab values of urinary and blood calcium, phosphate, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, serum cholesterol, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase concentrations might increase with vitamin D use, especially with high doses (10142,91349,93943).
A case of elevated international normalized ration (INR) has been reported for an 84 year-old patient who took vitamin D 50,000 IU daily for 2 months. The patient's serum levels of vitamin D increased from <7 ng/mL to 100 ng/mL over 6 months. To resolve symptoms, vitamin D supplementation was discontinued (84433).

Musculoskeletal ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken in excessive doses (10142,17506). Symptoms of vitamin D toxicity include osteoporosis in adults and decreased growth in children (10142).

Ocular/Otic ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses (10142,17506). Symptoms of vitamin D toxicity include calcific conjunctivitis and photophobia (10142).

Psychiatric ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses (10142,17506). In rare cases, symptoms of vitamin D toxicity include psychosis (10142,93002).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses. Advanced symptoms of vitamin D toxicity may include runny nose (10142,17506,93002).

Renal ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses. Symptoms of vitamin D toxicity include azotemia. Vitamin D may also cause hypercalcemia, with advanced symptoms including kidney stones or kidney insufficiency due to precipitation of calcium phosphate in the tubules. Symptoms of renal impairment include frequency, nighttime awakening to urinate, thirst, inability to concentrate urine, and proteinuria. Renal impairment is usually reversible with discontinuation of vitamin D supplements (10142,93002,93943,110831,110833).

Report an Adverse Reaction to R-PCT