Amino-Tor Pink Lemonade by Syntrax

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Hepatic encephalopathy. Oral and intravenous BCAAs improve symptoms and nutritional status in patients with hepatic encephalopathy, especially in those not tolerating protein supplementation. Details: Taking BCAAs 240 mg/kg (up to 25 grams) daily in 3 divided doses for up to 3 months can improve symptoms, liver function tests, and nitrogen balance in patients with chronic hepatic encephalopathy (68,69,82,690,92643,97531). Oral BCAAs are recommended for malnourished patients with chronic hepatic encephalopathy who cannot tolerate protein supplementation (69,4274). When the enteral route is unavailable and when patients cannot tolerate general purpose amino acid solutions, intravenous solutions with BCAAs can be used for nutritional support; however, most patients can tolerate standard amino acid mixtures (4274). Some clinical research also suggests that taking BCAAs orally improves psychomotor function, attention, intelligence, and driving ability in patients with latent hepatic encephalopathy (684,685,37131,97531). However, not all studies show a positive effect of BCAAs on psychometric outcomes (37135). There is also some preliminary evidence that intravenous BCAAs might be helpful for reversing coma in acute hepatic encephalopathy, although findings are conflicting (66,81,686,687,688,689,4274,37134). BCAAs do not appear to reduce the risk of mortality or improve quality of life in patients with hepatic encephalopathy (92643,97531).
• Tardive dyskinesia. Oral BCAAs might reduce symptoms of tardive dyskinesia precipitated by antipsychotic drugs. Details: Taking BCAAs orally seems to reduce symptoms of tardive dyskinesia (72,10146,13307). Clinical research in adult and pediatric patients who are taking antipsychotic drugs shows that taking a drink containing BCAAs 222 mg/kg three times daily for 3 weeks reduces tardive dyskinesia movements by 30% to 60% when compared with placebo (10146,13307).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Liver cancer. Oral BCAAs do not seem to improve outcomes or reduce the risk for recurrence in patients with liver cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of the available clinical research, as well as individual clinical studies, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma show that consuming up to 50 grams of BCAAs twice daily for up to 4 years does not improve survival, reduce tumor recurrence, or reduce the risk of complications such as ascites following liver resection when compared with a control group receiving no intervention (37143,92646,97532,105578). However, one small clinical study suggests that BCAAs may be beneficial in patients recently diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma that does not require surgery. Taking two packets of a specific supplement (Aminoleban EN) daily containing a total of L-leucine 4 grams, L-isoleucine 3.8 grams, and L-valine 3.2 grams, starting two weeks before receiving transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation and continuing for up to 5 years, reduces recurrence of liver cancer and increases event-free survival when compared with placebo (97533). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the high withdrawal rate in this study.

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). Overall, oral BCAAs are not beneficial and might even lead to worsened outcomes in patients with ALS. Details: Although early studies have indicated that taking BCAAs might be beneficial in ALS, more recent studies show no benefit and a possible increased loss of pulmonary function and higher rate of mortality among patients using BCAAs (678,679,680,681,37154).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if dietary BCAAs prevent Alzheimer disease. Details: Observational research has found that higher blood levels of BCAAs are associated with an 11% to 13% lower risk of Alzheimer disease; however, when research was adjusted for mortality, body mass index, and concomitant cholesterol-lowering medications, the association was no longer significant (100469).
• Athletic performance. Small clinical trials suggest that although oral BCAAs may not enhance athletic performance, they may modestly reduce perceived exertion and fatigue with some forms of exercise. Details: In most studies, taking BCAAs orally does not enhance athletic performance (692,1135,37080,37094,37106,37123,37141,37142,37151,92641). For instance, BCAAs do not appear to improve strength or work power or to reduce completion times for long-distance running or cycling trials (692,37106,37112,37141,37142,92641). However, most research shows that BCAAs are beneficial for reducing exercise-induced fatigue and perceived exertion after prolonged or intense exercise, exercise in the heat, or exercise following glycogen depletion (692,37112,37124,37144,92642,92644,92645,92648,97529,97530)(97535,105582). In many cases, this improvement is observed when BCAAs are taken in combination with arginine, citrulline, or green tea powder (37124,92642,92645,92648,97529,100462). However, some conflicting evidence exists (1135,37080,37094). Overall, the validity of these findings is limited because most studies differ widely in the amount and type of product consumed. For example, studied doses included BCAAs 0.17-0.3 mg/kg daily; or valine 0.5-1.7 grams, leucine 1-3.5 grams, and isoleucine 0.48-2.1 grams given before and/or after exercise (37108,37123,92642,92644,92645). Other limitations include variability in the studied endpoints and control comparisons used.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: One small clinical study shows that consuming a tyrosine-free amino acid drink containing 60 grams of the BCAAs leucine, isoleucine, and valine in a ratio of 3:3:4, reduces acute manic symptoms within 6 hours when compared with placebo. When taken daily for 7 days, it seems to continue to improve symptoms over a 2-week period (10117).
• Cachexia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with cachexia from various causes. Details: Preliminary clinical research in elderly malnourished patients receiving hemodialysis shows that taking a combination of BCAAs 4 grams three times daily improves appetite and caloric intake and increases plasma albumin levels and anthropometric measurements when compared with placebo (10147). Also, small clinical studies in adults with cachexia due to cancer or cirrhosis show that taking oral BCAAs 2.4 grams twice daily for 1 year or 4.8 grams 3 times daily for 1 week might be helpful when compared to baseline (71,37090). This finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. A small clinical study in adults with congestive heart failure who have lost at least 7.5% of dry weight over the past 6 months or have a body mass index below 20 kg/m² shows that taking BCAAs 10 grams every evening at bedtime for 8 weeks improves physical and emotional quality of life scores, appetite, and fatigue when compared with placebo. Patients taking melatonin 20 mg nightly in addition to BCAA supplementation observed greater improvements in appetite and fatigue when compared with placebo (108478). However, a statistical comparison of outcomes between the groups taking BCAA alone or BCAA with melatonin was not provided.
• Cancer. It is unclear if dietary BCAA consumption improves cancer-related mortality. Details: Observational research in adults has found that consuming BCAAs 19 grams or more daily as part of the diet is not associated with a reduced risk of cancer-related mortality when compared with a lower dietary BCAA intake of less than 7.8 grams daily (108467). The validity of this finding is limited due to unclear reporting; additionally, dietary intake was recorded from a single survey.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if dietary BCAA consumption reduces the risk of CVD-related mortality. Details: Observational research in adults has found that CVD-related mortality is not associated with dietary BCAA intake or with individual leucine, isoleucine, or valine intake (108467). The validity of this meta-analysis is limited due to unclear reporting; additionally dietary intake was recorded from a single survey.
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral BCAAs can improve physical performance in adults with COPD. Details: A clinical study in adults with stable, stage 2 or 3 COPD undergoing a pulmonary rehabilitation program shows that taking a BCAA powder 4.3 grams, diluted in water and consumed once daily for 4 weeks, may improve recovery after exercise, but does not impact maximal exercise capacity, functional and muscular performance, or quality of life when compared with placebo (108464). The validity of these findings is limited due to the short duration of treatment.
• Cirrhosis. Most small studies suggest that BCAAs may modestly improve certain measures in some patients with liver cirrhosis. Details: One small clinical study shows that although taking BCAAs 14.4 grams daily for 12 months does not improve survival or liver function in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis, the number of hospitalizations and prevalence of cachexia are reduced and quality of life is improved when compared with control or whey protein (37090). A clinical study in patients with sarcopenia and liver cirrhosis shows that taking BCAAs 7.2 grams for 6 months decreases bilirubin levels and improves Child-Turcotte-Pugh and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores when compared with baseline (108468). Although the study enrolled a control group (whey protein), the investigators did not provide a statistical comparison of outcomes between groups. In addition, a small study in Japanese patients with cirrhosis shows that taking BCAAs 12.45 grams daily for at least 12 months improves liver function and reduces liver complications by 50% to 60% over 3-5 years when compared with control (37120). Also, taking a specific product (Livact, Samil Pharmaceutical) providing the same dose for 11-22 months improves liver function by a small to moderate amount over a 24-month period when compared with not taking BCAAs. There was also a moderate reduction in the rate of developing or worsening major complications such as ascites or hepatic encephalopathy (103351). However, some research providing BCAAs as part of a late evening snack has found no benefit. In one small study, consuming BCAAs as part of a late evening snack in an undefined dose for 3 months does not seem to improve quality of life when compared with a late evening snack without BCAAs (37101). Also, a very small clinical study in patients with abnormal glucose metabolism related to cirrhosis shows that consuming BCAAs in an undefined dose as part of a late evening snack for 1 week does not improve glycemic control when compared with baseline. Instead, glucose levels increased in some patients (103348). It is possible that the doses provided in these latter studies were lower than those used in the studies showing benefit. Additionally, these very small studies may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if dietary BCAAs are beneficial or harmful in patients with colorectal cancer. Details: An observational study in Italy has found that increased dietary intake of BCAAs is associated with a lower risk of developing sigmoid colon cancer, but not overall colorectal cancer risk, when compared with lower intake (105584). However, there's some concern that increased dietary BCAAs may have negative effects in patients who have been diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Observational research in patients living in the US has found that higher dietary intake of BCAAs is associated with a slightly higher risk of all-cause mortality when compared with lower intake (105581).
• Dementia. It is unclear if dietary BCAAs help to prevent dementia. Details: Observational research has found that higher blood levels of BCAAs are associated with a 13% to 17% lower risk of dementia. The lowered risk was maintained when research was adjusted for mortality, body mass index, and concomitant cholesterol-lowering medications (100469).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if dietary BCAAs reduce the risk for developing diabetes. Details: Some population research in Japanese females has found a decreased risk of diabetes associated with higher intake of BCAAs (97543). However, other observational research in people from the US has found that increased dietary intake of BCAAs is associated with an increased risk of diabetes (97536). Reasons for the conflicting finding are not entirely clear. Some evidence suggests that the dietary pattern of BCAA intake, rather than the total intake, may influence the risk of diabetes. Also, there is some speculation that differences in gut microbiota may attribute to the observed differences in diabetes risk associated with BCAA intake (100465). Prospective clinical research is needed to determine whether this association is causal or correlative.
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. Small studies suggest that BCAAs might reduce some, but not all, markers of muscle damage caused by exercise. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies shows that supplementation with BCAAs reduces creatine kinase (CK) levels 24 hours post-exercise, but not 48 hours post-exercise. Additionally, this analysis shows that lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels are not affected by BCAA supplementation (97534). The validity of this analysis was limited because baseline dietary protein consumption was not taken into consideration as a potential confounder. A separate meta-analysis of clinical research in trained male athletes performing various resistance exercises shows that taking BCAAs 0.2-1.76 grams/kg for 1-28 days improves CK levels immediately following exercise, and at 24 and 48 hours post-exercise, but does not reduce LDH levels at any timepoint, when compared with placebo or control (108469). Most doses of BCAAs studied consisted of a 2:1:1 ratio of leucine, isoleucine, and valine, respectively. The validity of these findings is limited due to the short duration of treatment and various doses studied. Small individual clinical trials show that taking BCAAs does not affect urinary myoglobin after a marathon nor plasma myoglobin or CK levels after isotonic muscular exercise (37123,92641,100471). The benefits of BCAAs might depend on baseline protein consumption. A small clinical study in resistance trained males shows that adding BCAAs 0.22 grams/kg (MusclePharm BCAA) daily for 8 days to a high daily protein consumption of 1.2 grams/kg does not attenuate muscle damage or improve muscle recovery when compared with placebo (100471). Conversely, a meta-analysis of clinical research in adults completing various exercises shows that taking BCAAs consisting of any combination of valine, leucine, and isoleucine ratios modestly reduces CK, LDH, and myoglobin 24 and 48 hours post-exercise, but does not improve muscle recovery or muscle force after exercise, when compared with placebo (108471). The validity of these findings is limited due to unclear reporting.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Limited evidence suggests that oral BCAAs may modestly attenuate exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: One meta-analysis shows that taking BCAAs does not reduce delayed-onset muscle soreness after exercise when assessed at the individual time points of 24, 48, or 72 hours (97534). However, when results of all time points are pooled together in two separate meta-analyses, supplementation modestly reduces soreness after exercise (97534,103353). Most, but not all, individual trials also show that taking BCAAs in various doses, such as 0.087 grams/kg or 5-10 grams before and/or after exercise, modestly reduces muscle soreness after exercise (37108,37123,37124,92648,97530,97535,100467,100471,103346,108471). The validity of these individual trials is limited by their small sample sizes, variable dosing regimens, and enrolled populations, which were mainly limited to young untrained adult males (97534,103353). A separate meta-analysis of clinical research in trained male athletes performing various resistance exercises shows that taking BCAAs 0.2-1.76 grams/kg for 1-28 days may improve muscle soreness during the first 24 hours after exercise, but not at 24 or 48 hours post-exercise, when compared with placebo or control (108469). The validity of these findings is limited due to the short duration of treatment and various doses studied. Also, it is not clear whether taking BCAAs before or after a workout may be more beneficial. Some research found a nonsignificant trend toward reduced muscle soreness when consuming a specific product (Aminofeel, Seikatsu Bunkasya Co. Ltd.) containing BCAAs 3.2 grams three times daily starting 3 days before working out and continuing 3 days after, when compared to control (100467). More research is needed to determine the best dosing regimen and which populations, if any, may benefit.
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with heart failure. Details: A small clinical study in patients with heart failure and hypoalbuminemia shows that taking a specific packet of BCAA granules (LIVACT, Ajinomoto Co) containing L-valine 1144 mg, L-leucine 1904 mg, and L-isoleucine 952 mg, three times daily for at least 7 days and stopping after discharge from the hospital, does not affect serum albumin or cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) when compared with placebo (100470). It is possible that this study was underpowered to detect differences between groups. Another small clinical study in adults with chronic heart failure participating in a cardiac rehabilitation program shows that taking a specific oral supplement (Meiji Mei Balance Rehasupport Mini; Meiji Group) containing BCAAs 2.5 grams and various vitamins, minerals, and whey protein, twice daily for 12 weeks increases fat mass, but has no effect on peak oxygen uptake, 6-minute walking distance, or strength parameters, when compared with no supplementation (108470). It is unclear if these effects are due to BCAAs, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Hepatitis. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with hepatitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with alcoholic hepatitis shows that taking BCAAs 20 grams daily orally or enterally for 3 weeks or until discharge, in combination with a controlled diet, does not reduce the risk of mortality when compared with conventional protein or a controlled diet alone (37133).
• Inflammatory myopathies. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Details: A small clinical study in adults with suspected or confirmed polymyositis or dermatomyositis who are receiving standard corticosteroid therapy shows that a BCAA-specific product containing L-isoleucine 952 mg, L-leucine 1904 mg, and L-valine 1144 mg for 12-28 weeks, taken as two packages three times daily for a total daily dose of 24 grams, does not improve manual muscle test scores or clinical response at 12 and 28 weeks when compared with placebo (108477).
• Obesity. It is unclear of oral BCAAs can reduce the likelihood of developing obesity or improve weight loss in adults with overweight or obesity. Details: Some observational research has found that higher dietary intake of BCAAs is associated with lower odds of obesity when compared with a lower intake (100466). Conversely, a large observational study in adults in Iran, including those who are overweight or obese, has found that the highest dietary intake of BCAAs is associated with a 24% higher likelihood of general obesity in males, but not in females, when compared with the lowest dietary BCAA intake (108465). This study did not report ranges for highest and lowest BCAA intake, limiting the validity of this study. BCAAs have also been evaluated in adults with overweight or obesity. A small clinical study in obese females that underwent a 4-week calorie-restricted diet shows that taking 6 caplets daily containing a total of L-leucine 3 grams, L-isoleucine 1.5 grams, and L-valine 1.5 grams in addition to vitamin B6 40 mg daily for 4 weeks does not further reduce weight, but may slightly preserve lean body mass, when compared with placebo (100464). Another small clinical study in overweight and obese adults shows that taking BCAAs 0.1 gram/kg daily in addition to starting a low-calorie diet for 16 weeks does not improve weight loss, but may preserve lean muscle mass, when compared with taking placebo while following the low-calorie diet (105583).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if dietary BCAA consumption reduces the risk of all-cause mortality. Details: Observational research in adults has found that total BCAA intake, as well as isoleucine intake, is associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality, particularly in those with higher serum triglyceride concentrations (108467). However, this association was not present for leucine or valine intake. The validity of this meta-analysis is limited due to unclear reporting; additionally dietary intake was recorded from a single survey.
• Pancreatic cancer. The association between dietary BCAA intake and pancreatic cancer risk is unclear. Details: Observational research in adults in Italy has found that consuming BCAAs as part of the diet in quantities greater than 18 grams daily is associated with a 2-fold increased risk of pancreatic cancer when compared with less than 12 grams daily. This relationship was stronger in younger males, those with higher body mass indexes, and in those who smoke or have high alcohol intake (108476). Dietary information was recorded from a single, weekly consumption questionnaire.
• Phenylketonuria (PKU). It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with PKU. Details: A small clinical trial in adolescents and young adults with PKU shows that taking BCAAs, consisting of valine 150 mg/kg, isoleucine 150 mg/kg, and leucine 200 mg/kg, with meals and at bedtime for up to 6 months seems to improve attention and processing when compared with a control group (37127).
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial for improving physical function and muscle strength in older adults. Details: In malnourished elderly individuals, preliminary clinical research shows that taking a supplement providing BCAAs 5000 mg daily, in addition to other amino acids, vitamin B6, and vitamin B1 (Aminotrofic) for 2 months, does not improve muscle mass, muscle strength, or physical function to a greater extent than dietary advice intended to maximize nutritional intake from food and drink (103349). Similarly, a clinical study in middle aged and elderly adults shows that a specific product (Sarcojoint; Orient Euro Pharma, Inc) containing leucine 1 gram, arginine, vitamin D3, glucosamine, chondroitin, and calcium, taken twice daily in addition to regular resistance exercise for 12 weeks, does not improve muscle strength, muscle mass, or physical performance when compared with taking an unspecified vitamin B supplement twice daily with regular exercise (108472). Conversely, one small clinical study in older adults who have had a hip replacement shows that taking BCAAs 1.2 grams and lysine 1.8 grams (Amino-aile, Ajinomoto Co., Inc.) daily for one month after undergoing exercise therapy sessions modestly increases the strength of both legs and arms when compared with taking starch. However, there was no effect on hip abductor strength of the operated leg or on grip strength or measures of independence (103347).
• Postoperative infection. There is limited evidence on the intravenous and oral use of BCAAs for reducing infection after oncologic surgery. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 small heterogeneous clinical trials in patients after oncologic surgery, mostly for liver cancer, suggests that receiving oral or intravenous BCAAs reduces the risk of postoperative infection by 38% when compared with control (105577).
• Postoperative recovery. There is limited evidence on the intravenous and oral use of BCAAs for improving postoperative recovery after oncologic surgery. Details: A meta-analysis of small heterogeneous clinical trials in patients after oncologic surgery, mostly for liver cancer, suggests that receiving oral or intravenous BCAAs reduces hospital stay by about 2 days, but does not reduce mortality or post-operative complications, when compared with control (105577).
• Psychological well-being. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial for psychological well-being. Details: A cross-sectional observational study has found that higher dietary consumption of BCAAs is associated with a lower risk of anxiety and depression when compared with lower consumption (105579).
• Sarcopenia. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with primary sarcopenia or in those with sarcopenia related to liver cirrhosis. Details: A small clinical study in postmenopausal adults at risk for sarcopenia shows that consuming BCAAs 9 grams daily for 8 weeks in addition to resistance training increases strength and muscle mass when compared with baseline, but is no different than resistance training plus a placebo (105576). Another small clinical study in adults 65 years or older with sarcopenia shows that taking a supplement containing BCAAs 2500 mg, vitamin D 500 IU, protein, and other vitamins daily for 8 weeks in addition to resistance training does not improve physical function when compared with resistance training alone. The supplement did seem to slightly improve handgrip strength and body mass when compared with no supplementation (100468). However, overall the study was inadequately powered to detect smaller effects on physical function and muscle mass. There is also interest in using BCCAs in patients with sarcopenia and liver cirrhosis. A clinical study in this population shows that taking BCAAs 7.2 grams (containing 1.2 grams of L-leucine, 600 mg of L-isoleucine, and 600 mg of L-valine) daily for 6 months improves handgrip strength, gait speed, and muscle mass when compared with baseline (108468). Although the study enrolled a control group (whey protein), the investigators did not provide a statistical comparison of outcomes between groups. A separate meta-analysis of low-quality clinical research in this population shows that taking BCAAs has no effect on handgrip strength when compared with no supplementation (108473). Although other outcomes were evaluated, results are inconclusive due to the limited number of studies available for each outcome.
• Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with SCA. Details: Although there is some preliminary clinical evidence that oral BCAAs might have a beneficial effect on symptoms of SCA (73), a small clinical crossover study shows that taking a particular BCAA compound (Livact) 4.5-18 grams daily for 4 weeks does not improve ataxia in patients with SCA when compared with placebo (37088).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients recovering from stroke. Details:A small nonblinded, clinical study in elderly patients with subacute stroke and sarcopenia currently undergoing intensive inpatient rehabilitation therapy shows that administering a specific product (Seniup; Enterogenomics Co) containing BCAAs 6 grams, given twice daily orally or by feeding tube for 1 month, modestly improves skeletal muscle index, dysphagia, gait, balance, and handgrip strength, and may attenuate muscle loss in affected upper and lower extremities, when compared with rehabilitation alone (108474). The validity of these findings is limited by the short duration of treatment. Other research has compared BCAA dosing regimens. A small study in stroke patients taking part in exercise sessions shows that taking BCAAs 3.5 grams (Hepas, Clinico Co. Ltd) daily for 2 months with breakfast is more effective for improving leg strength and balance than when taken post-exercise in the mid-afternoon. However, there were no differences in most measures of strength or in skeletal muscle mass (103352). More evidence is needed to rate BCAAs for these uses.

(Read more about BRANCHED-CHAIN AMINO ACIDS (BCAA))

EFFECTIVE

• Sickle cell disease. A specific oral glutamine powder (Endari, Emmaus Medical, Inc) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to reduce acute complications of sickle cell disease. Details: Clinical research in adults and children 5 years of age and older shows that taking glutamine 5-15 grams (0.3 grams/kg body weight) orally twice daily for 48 weeks, either with or without hydroxyurea, delays the median time to first crisis by 30 days, and reduces the incidence of acute chest syndrome by 15%, number of hospitalizations by 33%, and the number of hospitalized days by 40%, when compared with placebo (96519,99414).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Burns. Oral glutamine seems to improve healing in patients with severe burns and may also reduce the risk for burn wound infections; however, it is unclear if glutamine improves hospitalization length or mortality. Details: Some clinical research shows that administering enteral nutrition supplemented with glutamine 0.35-0.5 grams/kg daily for 12-14 days, beginning within 24-48 hours of hospitalization for severe burn injury (excluding inhalation injury), decreases the length of hospital stay by 6-9 days and may shorten wound healing when compared to control enteral nutrition (52307,52337). A clinical study in adults with moderate to severe burns (including inhalation injury) shows that administering enteral nutrition supplemented with intravenous alanyl glutamine 0.5 grams/kg daily, beginning within 24 hours of burn injury and continued for 14 days, may improve burn-induced organ damage, particularly intestinal mucosal injury, but does not improve mortality or length of hospitalization, when compared with standard nutritional support (108027). Another study in the same population shows that administering enteral nutrition supplemented with glutamine 4.3 grams every 4 hours, beginning within 24 hours of burn injury, decreases the risk of mortality by 83% and the risk of Pseudomonas wound infections; however, it does not decrease the duration of hospitalization (52311). A meta-analysis of these trials and one additional trial shows that administering glutamine enterally reduces the risk of Gram-negative bacterial wound infections by 73% and reduces the risk of mortality by 87% when compared to a control group. However, there was no difference in length of stay or overall wound infection rate (97363). Results were based on a small number of patients within each outcome evaluation. Intravenous glutamine has also been evaluated. One small clinical study shows that intravenous glutamine 0.57 grams/kg daily decreases the incidence of Gram-negative bacteremia by 35% when compared with control in patients with severe burns. However, it does not appear to decrease the incidence of Gram-positive bacteremia, the need to use antibiotics, or risk of mortality (52272).
• Critical illness (trauma). Oral and intravenous glutamine seem to reduce infectious complications in critically ill adults. However, glutamine does not seem to reduce mortality in this population. Details: Some studies show that glutamine reduces the risk of infectious complications in critically ill, multiple-trauma, or postoperative adult patients (5449,5450,7309,7731,8184,52288,52359). However, other studies show no benefit (52308,52360,97362). Meta-analyses of these and other clinical trials suggest that glutamine supplementation reduces the risk of nosocomial infections in critically ill patients by 15% to 18% and the risk of nosocomial infections in surgical patients by 30% to 41%. This benefit was seen only with parenteral glutamine; enteral glutamine does not appear to reduce the risk for nosocomial infection (91355,91358). The role of glutamine for reducing mortality in critically ill adults is conflicting. Some clinical trials suggest that glutamine-enriched enteral and parenteral nutrition reduces mortality in critically ill patients (52283,52289,52408). However, other studies show no benefit (52288,52308,52354,52359,97362). Meta-analyses of results from these and other clinical trials show that, overall, taking glutamine does not reduce the risk of mortality in critically ill patients (91355,91358). However, the dose and dosage form may affect outcomes. One meta-analysis shows that glutamine does not affect the risk of mortality when administered at doses up to 0.5 grams/kg daily, although doses greater than 0.5 grams/kg daily may INCREASE mortality by 18% (91355). Another meta-analysis shows that glutamine decreases short-term mortality in critically ill patients by 25% when administered parenterally, but not enterally (91358). Neither parenteral nor enteral glutamine appears to decrease the risk of long-term mortality in critically ill patients (91358). Research evaluating glutamine in critically ill children is limited. One clinical study in children ages 1-17 admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) shows that enteral administration of glutamine along with zinc, selenium, and intravenous metoclopramide does not reduce nosocomial infections when compared with whey supplementation (86095).
• HIV/AIDS-related wasting. Oral glutamine seems to attenuate weight loss related to HIV/AIDS. Details: Very small clinical studies show that taking glutamine orally seems to enhance intestinal absorption of nutrients, decrease intestinal permeability, and increase weight gain in adults with HIV/AIDS when compared with placebo. Doses of 40 grams daily seem to produce the greatest effect (2337,2702). Lower doses of 14 grams daily might also be effective when used in combination with arginine and hydroxymethylbutyrate (a leucine metabolite) (7310).
• Postoperative recovery. Oral or intravenous glutamine seems to reduce the duration of hospitalization and improve postoperative nutritional status in adults. However, it does not seem to reduce postoperative mortality. Details: Although some conflicting evidence exists (52316), most clinical research shows that receiving free glutamine or glutamine-containing dipeptide intravenously decreases the duration of hospitalization after surgery, particularly after major abdominal surgery (2363,5448,7300,7732,52275,52341). A meta-analysis of this research and other studies shows that IV supplementation with glutamine-containing dipeptides reduces the length of hospital stay by 3 days when compared with no supplementation (96507). Other meta-analyses of clinical research also show that glutamine supplementation, as free glutamine or glutamine-containing dipeptides, reduces the risk of hospital-acquired infections by 30% in surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients and by 41% in elective surgical patients (91355,91358). In cancer patients undergoing abdominal surgery, glutamine-supplemented parenteral nutrition seems to improve nutritional status and gastrointestinal function (100943). Glutamine-containing dipeptides also appear to help to preserve intestinal integrity (7299,7300,7732,52306). One small study has evaluated oral glutamine 10 grams, in combination with arginine 4.5 grams, in patients undergoing surgery for enterocutaneous fistulas. This study shows that taking this combination daily for 7 days prior to surgery reduces recurrence of fistulas by 35%, and also reduces postoperative infections (103837). Although glutamine seems to decrease length of stay and reduce infection rate, it does not appear to reduce the risk of mortality in either surgical ICU or elective surgical patients (91355,91358,96509,103834), including those receiving major abdominal surgery (5448,52316,91355,96507). Additionally, most research shows that glutamine supplementation does not reduce the incidence of infectious complications following abdominal surgery (52306,52316,52341,5448,7300,96507). The effects of glutamine on reducing infection rate might be related to patient population, modes of nutrition, or dose of glutamine. Taking a combination of glutamine 7 grams, arginine 7 grams, and hydroxymethylbutyrate 1.2 grams (Abound, Abbott) orally daily for 3 days before and 7 days after abdominal surgery does not reduce the incidence of wound infections or other complications (99413). Most of the research evaluating glutamine in surgical patients has been conducted in adults. Information in children is limited. Existing clinical research shows that glutamine-fortified parenteral nutrition does not improve intestinal permeability, nitrogen balance, duration of hospitalization, incidence of infectious complications, or risk of mortality in newborns and infants undergoing digestive-tract surgery (52338,96508).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral glutamine does not seem to improve athletic performance. Details: Small studies in trained athletes or healthy adults show that taking glutamine orally does not seem to enhance performance or immune response during intense acute or prolonged exercise when compared with placebo (2341,2342,5455,5456).
• Crohn disease. Oral glutamine does not seem to improve symptoms of this condition. Details: Small clinical studies in adults and children with Crohn disease show that taking glutamine 7 grams three times daily or following a glutamine-enriched diet for 4 weeks does not seem to improve intestinal permeability or disease activity, and might even worsen disease activity, when compared with placebo or a low-glutamine diet (2338,6256).
• Cystinuria. Oral glutamine does not seem to improve cystinuria. Details: According to case reports, taking glutamine orally does not seem to reduce the excretion of cysteine in the urine in patients with homozygous cystinuria (2339).
• Low birth weight. Oral glutamine does not seem to reduce adverse consequences of low birth weight in infants. Details: Most clinical studies show that glutamine supplementation does not improve the time to full enteral feeding, infant growth rate, or length of hospital stay in low birth weight infants (52305,52312,52325,52342,52362,52410). One follow-up study also shows that neonatal glutamine supplementation is not associated with improvements in cognitive function, motor skills, or behavior outcomes by school age when corrected for neonatal infection rate (52342,97365).
• Muscular dystrophy. Oral glutamine does not seem to improve symptoms of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Details: Clinical studies show that taking glutamine 0.5-0.6 grams/kg orally does not significantly improve muscle strength or whole body protein degradation in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy when compared with placebo or a nonspecific amino acid mixture (46657,52363).
• Prematurity. Oral glutamine does not seem to reduce morbidity or mortality associated with prematurity. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical trials in preterm infants, including infants with low to very low birth weight, shows that use of enteral or parenteral glutamine does not reduce the risk of mortality or morbidities, such as necrotizing enterocolitis, when compared with control. However, limited evidence from a sub-group analysis suggests that enteral glutamine might modestly reduce the risk of invasive infection when compared with control (105015). These findings are limited by the selection bias and heterogeneity of the included trials.
• Radiation-induced diarrhea. Oral glutamine does not seem to improve diarrhea due to radiation therapy. Details: One meta-analysis of five randomized, controlled trials shows that taking oral glutamine during radiotherapy for pelvic cancers does not prevent or reduce the severity of diarrhea when compared with placebo (97367).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Antiretroviral-associated diarrhea. It is unclear if oral glutamine improves diarrhea caused by antiretroviral agents. Details: A small crossover clinical study in HIV patients shows that oral glutamine 30 grams daily for 10 days seems to reduce the severity of nelfinavir-associated diarrhea when compared with placebo (52313).
• Alcohol use disorder. Although there is interest in using oral glutamine for alcohol use disorder, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of glutamine for this condition.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although there is interest in using oral glutamine for ADHD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of glutamine for this condition.
• Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. It is unclear if oral glutamine improves diarrhea caused by chemotherapy. Details: Although preliminary clinical studies show that glutamine might reduce the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (7235,7285), a meta-analysis of this research and others shows no difference in the severity of diarrhea (7233,7295,96516). Despite results showing a significant 1-day reduction in the duration of diarrhea, this might not be considered clinically significant (96516).
• Chemotherapy-induced lymphocytopenia. It is unclear if oral glutamine reduces lymphocytopenia caused by chemotherapy. Details: One small clinical study in patients with esophageal cancer receiving chemo-radiotherapy shows that taking glutamine 30 grams daily for 28 days seems to prevent a reduction in lymphocytes when compared with placebo (2705). However, another small clinical trial in patients with leukemia or lymphoma receiving intensive chemotherapy shows that adding glutamine 26 grams to total parenteral nutrition (TPN), in place of other amino acids, does not affect duration of neutropenia when compared with receiving an isonitrogenous standard TPN (7295).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral glutamine is beneficial in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. Details: A very small, nonblinded, non-randomized evaluation of otherwise healthy patients over 50 years of age who were hospitalized with mild COVID-19 pneumonia shows that taking glutamine 10 grams three times daily orally with meals is associated with a 1-day decrease in hospital stay (from 10 days to 9) when compared with patients not taking glutamine. In the latter group, 4 patients required transfer to the ICU, compared with no patients in the glutamine group (103839). A similar, non-randomized evaluation of adults hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia shows that adding the same dose of glutamine to other therapies for 5 days is associated with a 3-day decrease in hospital stay (from 14 days to 11) when compared with patients not taking glutamine. At the end of treatment, 0% of patients in the glutamine group required ICU services, compared with 54% of patients who did not receive glutamine. This study also shows that taking glutamine may increase appetite (108035). The validity of these findings is limited by short duration of treatment and use of non-standardized treatments.
• Cystic fibrosis. It is unclear if oral glutamine improves growth and development in children with cystic fibrosis. Details: A small clinical study in undernourished or stunted children with cystic fibrosis shows that taking glutamine 0.7 grams/kg daily orally for 4 weeks with or without recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) does not promote protein gain when compared with rhGH alone (52321).
• Diabetic foot ulcers. Oral glutamine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific nutritional supplement drink containing glutamine 7 grams, arginine 7 grams, and hydroxymethylbutyrate 1.5 grams (Abound, Abbott) twice daily for 16 weeks does not improve total wound closure or reduce the time to complete healing when compared with a control drink in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (96637). It is unclear if this effect is due to glutamine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Diarrhea. It is unclear if oral glutamine improves diarrhea in children and infants. Details: One preliminary clinical study in 6-24 month-old otherwise healthy children with acute diarrhea shows that taking capsules prepared with a specific glutamine powder (Power Glutamine, Champion Nutrition) 0.3 grams/kg daily for 7 days reduces the duration of diarrhea by about one day when compared with placebo (52323). However, other clinical research in male infants 1-12 months old with acute diarrhea and dehydration shows that adding glutamine 90 mmol/L along with the standard World Health Organization oral rehydration salts (ORS) does not decrease the duration of diarrhea, stool output, or the volume of oral rehydration solution required to achieve and maintain hydration when compared with standard ORS alone (7298).
• Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). It is unclear whether oral glutamine or glutamine added to parenteral nutrition improves morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing HSCT. Some research has suggested that intravenous glutamine may actually worsen outcomes. Details: Some research suggests that patients receiving glutamine-supplemented parenteral nutrition (PN) after HSCT primarily to treat hematologic malignancies have a diminished incidence of clinical infections, lower rates of microbial colonization, and decreased length of hospital stay when compared to control (2366,52381). However, not all patients seem to benefit. Some research shows that oral glutamine or PN with glutamine does not reduce the risk of mortality or infections in patients with hematologic malignancies and/or solid tumors (5451,52385). Also, a small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that PN with glutamine dipeptide may increase the duration of hospital stay (52292). Furthermore, one small study has found that receiving PN with glutamine was associated with lower disease-free survival and event-free survival over 3 years when compared with standard PN in patients receiving HSCT for hematologic malignancies (52355).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). There is limited evidence on the oral use of glutamine in patients with IBS. Details: A clinical trial in adults with IBS (diarrhea-predominant, constipation-predominant, mixed, or alternating bowel habits) shows that following a low FODMAP diet supplemented with oral glutamine 15 grams three times daily for 6 weeks improves IBS-Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) scores, with 88% of patients in the glutamine group reporting a 45% improvement in severity scores, compared with 60% of patients following the low FODMAP diet alone (108037). The validity of this finding is limited by short duration of treatment and lack of follow-up. Preliminary clinical research in patients with postinfectious, diarrhea-predominant IBS shows that taking glutamine 5 grams three times daily for 8 weeks leads to a nearly 14-fold greater likelihood of symptom improvement, defined as a reduction of 50 points or more on the IBS-SSS, and decreases stool frequency by 2.45 stools daily when compared with placebo. Taking glutamine also seems to reduce abdominal pain ratings by 55% and improve quality of life scores by 53% when compared to baseline in these patients (100944). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral glutamine improves survival in patients with advanced lung cancer. Details: One small clinical study in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer shows that taking glutamine 10 grams three times daily for 12 months along with palliative chemoradiotherapy prevents weight loss, which is an important predictor of survival, but does not increase the likelihood of progression-free survival when compared with palliative chemoradiotherapy alone (100942). It is unclear if this study was adequately powered to detect a difference in survival between groups.
• Malnutrition. It is unclear if oral alanyl-glutamine improves height and weight in children at risk for malnutrition. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children aged 2 months to 5 years from a low-income area of Brazil and at risk for malnutrition, shows that taking 3-12 grams of alanyl-glutamine orally daily for 10 days improves gut integrity and is associated with a modest, short-term increase in weight when compared with a glycine placebo (103838).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral glutamine is beneficial for exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A very small clinical crossover trial in professional athletes undergoing rigorous training shows that taking oral glutamine 6 grams daily for 20 days reduces serum levels of creatine kinase and myoglobin when compared with placebo (108031). The validity of these findings is limited due to the small size and short duration of treatment.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral glutamine is beneficial for weight loss. Details: A preliminary clinical study in 36 overweight or obese adults shows that taking glutamine 30 grams daily for 2 weeks reduces waist circumference by 1.8 cm, but does not improve body weight, body mass index, or glycemic indices, when compared to baseline. None of these outcomes were improved over baseline in an alanine control group (100941). Given the small study size and short duration of therapy, the long-term effects of glutamine on anthropometric measures is unclear.
• Opioid withdrawal. Oral glutamine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in Chinese patients undergoing detoxification from heroin shows that taking a combination of tyrosine, lecithin, 5-HTP, and glutamine 50 mg/kg orally daily for 6 days might reduce mood-related withdrawal symptoms when compared with placebo (88178). It is unclear if this effect is due to glutamine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Oral mucositis. There is contradictory evidence about the effects of glutamine in patients with, or at risk of developing, oral mucositis from chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Details: Small clinical studies suggest that taking glutamine orally or swishing and swallowing a glutamine solution can decrease the incidence, severity, and duration of oral mucositis in some patients undergoing chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy for cancer or hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (2336,2368,2704,5029). Additionally, three meta-analyses of highly heterogeneous clinical trials in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy suggests that glutamine reduces the incidence of severe (grade ≥3) oral mucositis when compared with control (105014,108028,108036). These analyses are limited for several reasons, including reporting bias, lack of sensitivity analysis, and population heterogeneity. Some small clinical studies included in these meta-analyses suggest that supplementation with glutamine may reduce the need for feeding tubes and opioid analgesics (108028,108036). However, not all research has been positive. Some small clinical studies in patients receiving chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil for cancer or HSCT suggest that oral or intravenous glutamine does not reduce the incidence of oral mucositis when compared with control (2365,5451,5462,7296,52349,52350). Furthermore, a meta-analysis of 5 clinical trials in patients with head or neck cancers shows that oral glutamine does not reduce the overall incidence or the incidence of moderate to severe radiation-induced oral mucositis when compared with control (103836). The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and the International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) cautiously recommends the use of oral glutamine to prevent oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy. However, due to some evidence suggesting that intravenous glutamine may actually worsen outcomes in HSCT patients, the MASCC/ISOO recommends against its use for the prevention of oral mucositis in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy, with or without total body irradiation, for HSCT (105004).
• Paclitaxel-induced myalgia and arthralgia. It is unclear if oral glutamine reduces the risk for myalgias and arthralgias due to paclitaxel. Details: One small clinical study shows that taking glutamine 10 grams three times daily for 5 days, starting on the day of chemotherapy and repeated over 2 cycles of chemotherapy, does not reduce the rate or severity of paclitaxel-induced myalgias or arthralgias when compared with placebo (52331).
• Pancreatitis. It is unclear if oral glutamine improves outcomes in patients with acute pancreatitis. Details: Two meta-analyses of the available clinical research in patients with pancreatitis show that enteral or parenteral supplementation with glutamine increases albumin, decreases C-reactive protein, and might reduce mortality, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, hospital length of stay, and infections. Results are difficult to interpret due to the significant heterogeneity of the included trials and limited generalizability of the results (96513,103835).
• Peptic ulcers. Although there is interest in using oral glutamine for peptic ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of glutamine for this condition.
• Postoperative infection. It is unclear if oral or intravenous glutamine is beneficial for the prevention of postoperative infection in patients with colorectal cancer who are recovering from surgery. Details: A meta-analysis of nonblinded clinical research in adults with colorectal or colon cancer who recently underwent radical surgery shows that daily supplementation with glutamine 0.3-1 grams/kg, administered either orally or parenterally, improves the rate of surgical site infections and anastomotic leakage when compared with control (108033). These findings are limited by the high heterogeneity of the included studies and unclear reporting.
• Postoperative recovery. It is unclear if oral or intravenous glutamine is beneficial in patients with colorectal cancer who are recovering from surgery. Details: A meta-analysis of nonblinded clinical research in adults with colorectal or colon cancer who recently underwent radical surgery shows that taking either oral or parenteral glutamine 0.3-1 grams/kg daily may reduce the length of hospital stay when compared with control (108033). These findings are limited by the high heterogeneity of the included studies and unclear reporting.
• Pressure ulcers. Oral glutamine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with stages II-IV pressure ulcers shows that taking a specific nutritional supplement drink containing glutamine 7 grams, arginine 7 grams, and hydroxymethylbutyrate 1.5 grams per packet (Abound, Abbott Nutrition) as two packets twice daily by mouth for 2 weeks has no effect on wound area or healing scores by the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) measurement when compared with standard nutritional care (96506).
• Radiation dermatitis. It is unclear if oral glutamine reduces the risk of developing dermatitis from radiation therapy. Details: One small clinical study in patients with head and neck cancers receiving cisplatin shows that taking a specific supplement containing glutamine 7 grams, arginine 7 grams, and hydroxymethylbutyrate 1.5 grams (Abound, Abbott) orally twice daily, starting on day 1 of radiation and continuing until 1 week after radiation therapy, does not reduce the incidence of severe radiation-induced dermatitis when compared with no supplementation (96639). However, another small clinical study in patients with breast cancer who have had both chemotherapy and surgery shows that taking oral glutamine 5 grams three times daily, starting 1 week before radiation and continuing until 1 week after radiation, is associated with a reduction in grade 1 and grade 2 radiation dermatitis when compared with placebo (97366).
• Radiation-induced esophagitis. It is unclear if oral glutamine reduces the risk of developing esophagitis from radiation therapy. Details: A small clinical study in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer shows that taking glutamine 10 grams three times daily for 12 months along with a palliative dose of chemoradiotherapy (total 30 Gy) results in a 7% incidence of symptomatic (grade 2 or higher) radiation-induced esophagitis, compared with a 53% incidence with palliative chemoradiotherapy alone. The glutamine group also had a 5.8-day delay in the onset of esophagitis (100942). However, a lower dose of glutamine in patients receiving higher doses of radiotherapy might not be beneficial. A small clinical study in patients with advanced thoracic malignancies shows that taking glutamine 4 grams mixed in water twice daily for 4 weeks along with radiotherapy (total dose of at least 45 Gy) to the esophagus, with or without chemotherapy, does not slow the onset of radiation-induced esophagitis or reduce its severity when compared with a glycine placebo (105011).
• Short bowel syndrome. It is unclear if oral glutamine improves symptoms of short bowel syndrome. Details: Although small clinical studies suggest that glutamine plus growth hormone can decrease dependence on parenteral nutrition in some patients (2334,2361,2362,2703), it has not shown benefit for improving intestinal absorption of energy in all studies (8185). Additionally, glutamine alone doesn't appear to be beneficial (7730).
• Traumatic Brain injury (TBI). It is unclear if intravenous glutamine is beneficial in patients hospitalized with severe TBI. Details: A clinical trial in patients hospitalized for a severe TBI shows that adherence to a hypocaloric, low-protein diet supplemented with daily intravenous glutamine 0.3 g/kg for 7 days does not improve 28-day mortality when compared with standard nutritional support alone. However, it may reduce the length of ventilator use, hospitalization, and duration of intensive care unit stay (108034).
• Vincristine-induced neuropathy. It is unclear if oral glutamine reduces the risk of developing neuropathy from treatment with vincristine in children. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children ages 1-21 years receiving vincristine for various cancer types shows that taking glutamine 6 grams/m2 twice daily orally for 21 days reduces sensory neuropathy when compared with placebo. There was a significant improvement in self-reported, but not parent-reported, quality of life scores as measured by the PedsQL scale. However, there was no effect on motor neuropathy with the use of glutamine (96517).
• Wound healing. It is unclear if oral glutamine improves wound healing. Details: Preliminary clinical research in trauma patients with wound healing disorders shows that taking glutamine 20 grams orally daily in combination with ascorbic acid 500 mg, vitamin E 166 mg, beta-carotene 3.2 mg, selenium 100 mcg, and zinc 6.6 mg (Glutamine Plus, Fresenius Kabi) for 14 days reduces the time to wound closure by 29 days when compared with placebo. However, there is no difference in length of stay (97364). More evidence is needed to rate glutamine for these uses.

(Read more about GLUTAMINE)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Cystic fibrosis. Long-term nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride improves lung function and reduces pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis show that, when taken along with a bronchodilator and other standard therapies, nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride in concentrations of 3% to 7%, up to 10 mL twice daily for 4 weeks, increases forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) when compared with isotonic saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) (26230,26230). This benefit was not seen at 48 weeks. Other clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis shows that inhaling sodium chloride 7%, 4 mL twice daily for 48 weeks, does not improve FEV1 when compared with isotonic saline. However, chronic treatment with hypertonic saline does reduce the number of pulmonary exacerbations and increase the number of patients without pulmonary exacerbations when compared with isotonic saline (29402). It is not clear if this benefit occurs in children with cystic fibrosis. The Pulmonary Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends that individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 6 years or older use nebulized hypertonic saline long-term to improve lung function, reduce the number of exacerbations, and improve quality of life (29403).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity. Oral sodium chloride seems to prevent nephrotoxicity associated with use of amphotericin B. Details: Clinical research shows that administering oral or intravenous sodium chloride 150 mEq daily during treatment with amphotericin B can attenuate the rise in serum creatinine levels and preserve renal function when compared to treatment with amphotericin B alone (26226).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in preventing lithium level fluctuations in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A moderate-sized open-label clinical study in adults with type I bipolar disorder receiving lithium carbonate shows that taking sodium chloride 1 gram daily for 12 weeks along with dietary salt restriction of 1 gram daily reduces the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L, but does not significantly affect serum sodium, potassium, aldosterone, or creatinine levels when compared with controls who were not salt restricted, but were advised not to consume additional salt at the table (112909). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by missing data in both groups.
• Canker sores. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for canker sores, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Congestive heart failure. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in patients with acute decompensated heart failure requiring decongestive therapy with diuretics. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure requiring high-dose intravenous furosemide shows that taking sodium chloride 2 grams three times daily for up to 96 hours does not affect patient weight or serum creatinine levels when compared with placebo (112911). However, the clinical relevance of this study is unclear and it may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Conjunctivitis. Although there is interest in using ophthalmic sodium chloride for conjunctivitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Hyponatremia. Although there is interest in using oral sodium chloride for hyponatremia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral sodium chloride for this condition.
• Pharyngitis. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for pharyngitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial for premature infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in infants born at less than 32 weeks' gestation shows that adding sodium 4 mEq/kg daily to enteral feedings, starting from the 7th day after birth and continuing through the 35th day, reduces the risk of developing hyponatremia and improves weight gain when compared with adding water (98180). A small, open-label clinical study in newborns less than 35 weeks gestation shows that high sodium intake, defined as an average of 0.25% sodium in maintenance fluids, for 48 hours on day 2 and 3 after birth results in less weight loss within the first 72 hours of life when compared with control, but does not improve mortality, length of hospital stay, or complications from prematurity (112908). However, interpretation of these findings is limited by varied concentrations of sodium as an intervention. More evidence is needed to rate sodium for these uses.

(Read more about SODIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. BCAAs 12 grams daily have not been associated with significant adverse effects in studies lasting for up to 2 years (68,72,73,74,10117,10146,10147,37120,92643,97531,103351,103352). ...when used intravenously and appropriately. BCAAs are an FDA-approved injectable product (13309).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in dietary amounts of 71-134 mg/kg daily (11120,13308).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when larger, supplemental doses are used orally and appropriately for up to 6 months (13307,13308,37127).

PREGNANCY:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using amounts greater than those found in food. Although adverse effects have not been reported in humans, some animal research suggests that consumption of supplemental isoleucine, a BCAA, during the first half of pregnancy may have variable effects on birth weight, possibly due to abnormal placental development (103350).

LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using amounts greater than those found in food. Although the safety of increased BCAA consumption during lactation is unclear, some clinical research suggests that a higher concentration of isoleucine and leucine in breastmilk during the first 6 months postpartum is not associated with infant growth or body composition at 2 weeks, 2 months, or 6 months (108466).

(Read more about BRANCHED-CHAIN AMINO ACIDS (BCAA))

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Glutamine has been safely used in clinical research in doses up to 40 grams per day or 1 gram/kg daily (2334,2337,2338,2365,5029,5462,7233,7288,7293), (52288,52307,52308,52311,52313,52337,52349,52350,96516,97366). A specific glutamine product (Endari) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (96520). ...when used intravenously. Glutamine has been safely incorporated into parenteral nutrition in doses up to 600 mg/kg daily in clinical trials (2363,2366,5448,5452,5453,5454,5458,7293,52272,52275), (52283,52289,52304,52306,52316,52341), (52359,52360,52371,52377,52381,52284,52385,52408,96637,96507,96516).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Glutamine has been shown to be safe in clinical research when used in amounts that do not exceed 0.7 grams/kg daily in children 1-18 years old (11364,46657,52321,52323,52363,86095,96517). A specific glutamine product (Endari) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for certain patients 5 years of age and older (96520). ...when used intravenously. Glutamine has been safely incorporated into parenteral nutrition in doses up to 0.4 grams/kg daily in clinical research (52338,96508). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of glutamine when used in larger amounts in children.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when consumed in amounts commonly found in foods. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of glutamine when used in larger amounts as medicine during pregnancy or lactation.

(Read more about GLUTAMINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher doses can be safely used therapeutically with appropriate medical monitoring (26226,26227).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid exceeding the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension and increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (26229,98176,98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,100310,109395,109396,109398,109399). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sodium when used topically.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (26229,100310). Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid prolonged use of doses exceeding the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension (26229).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in higher doses. Higher intake can cause hypertension (100310). Also, both the highest and the lowest pre-pregnancy sodium quintile intakes are associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia, and the delivery of small for gestational age (SGA) infants when compared to the middle intake quintile (106264).

(Read more about SODIUM)

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, BCAAs might alter the effects of antidiabetes medications.  Details Some evidence suggests that BCAAs might stimulate insulin release (10105,10110,10113,10114,10118). However, a small clinical study in adults with liver cirrhosis and high nocturnal levels of blood glucose suggests that BCAAs might increase blood glucose levels (103348).

LEVODOPA Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B BCAAs in large doses can reduce the effects of levodopa.  Details BCAAs may compete with levodopa for transport systems in the intestine and brain and decrease the effectiveness of levodopa (66,2719). Small clinical studies how that concomitant ingestion of protein or high doses of leucine or isoleucine (100 mg/kg) and levodopa can exacerbate tremor, rigidity, and the "on-off" syndrome in patients with Parkinson disease (3291,3292,3293,3294).

(Read more about BRANCHED-CHAIN AMINO ACIDS (BCAA))

ANTICONVULSANTS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, glutamine might antagonize the effects of anticonvulsant medications.  Details Glutamine is metabolized to the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate. Glutamate might have antagonistic effects with anticonvulsant drugs (7292,7293,7294). However, this interaction has not yet been reported in humans.

(Read more about GLUTAMINE)

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = A Theoretically, a high intake of dietary sodium might reduce the effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs.  Details High intake of dietary sodium can increase systolic and diastolic blood pressure (26222). Also, high intake of sodium may necessitate increased use of antihypertensive medications to achieve blood pressure control in some patients, such as those with chronic kidney disease (26223).

CORTICOSTEROIDS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids with sodium supplements might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids (corticosteroids) cause sodium retention. This effect is dose-related and depends on mineralocorticoid potency. It is most common with hydrocortisone, cortisone, and fludrocortisone, followed by prednisone and prednisolone (4425).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Altering dietary intake of sodium might alter the levels and clinical effects of lithium.  Details High sodium intake can reduce plasma concentrations of lithium by increasing lithium excretion (26225). Reducing sodium intake can significantly increase plasma concentrations of lithium and cause lithium toxicity in patients being treated with lithium carbonate (26224,26225). Stabilizing sodium intake is shown to reduce the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L (112909). Patients taking lithium should avoid significant alterations in their dietary intake of sodium.

SODIUM-CONTAINING DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of sodium-containing drugs with additional sodium from dietary or supplemental sources may increase the risk of hypernatremia and long-term sodium-related complications.  Details The Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams of sodium daily indicates the intake at which it is believed that chronic disease risk increases for the apparently healthy population (100310). Some medications contain high quantities of sodium. When used in conjunction with sodium supplements or high-sodium diets, the CDRR may be exceeded. Additionally, concomitant use may increase the risk for hypernatremia; this risk is highest in the elderly and people with other risk factors for electrolyte disturbances.

TOLVAPTAN (Samsca) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, concomitant use of tolvaptan with sodium might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Tolvaptan is a vasopressin receptor 2 antagonist that is used to increase sodium levels in patients with hyponatremia (29406). Patients taking tolvaptan should use caution with the use of sodium salts such as sodium chloride.

(Read more about SODIUM)

General ...Orally or intravenously, BCAAs are generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal distension, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting.
All routes of administration: High doses can lead to fatigue and loss of motor coordination.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, a single case of hypertension following the use of BCAAs has been reported (37143).

Dermatologic ...Orally, a single case of skin blanching following the use of BCAAs has been reported (681). It is not known if this effect was due to use of BCAAs or other factors.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, BCAAs can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal distension. Nausea and diarrhea has been reported to occur in about 10% of people taking BCAAs (10117,37143,92643,97531).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally and intravenously, BCAAs can cause fatigue and loss of motor coordination due to increased plasma ammonia levels (693,694,10117). Short-term use of 60 grams of BCAAs containing leucine, isoleucine, and valine for 7 days in patients with normal metabolic function seems to increase levels of ammonia, but not to toxic plasma levels (10117). However, liver function should be monitored with high doses or long-term use (10117). Due to the potential of increased plasma levels of ammonia and subsequent fatigue and loss of motor coordination, BCAAs should be used cautiously before or during activities where performance depends on motor coordination (75). Orally, BCAAs may also cause headache, but this has only been reported in one clinical trial (681).

(Read more about BRANCHED-CHAIN AMINO ACIDS (BCAA))

General ...Orally and intravenously, glutamine is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Belching, bloating, constipation, cough, diarrhea, flatulence, gastrointestinal pain, headache, musculoskeletal pain, nausea, and vomiting.

Endocrine ...One case of hot flashes has been reported in a patient taking glutamine 5-15 grams orally twice daily for up to 1 year (96520).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, glutamine has been associated with belching, bloating, constipation, flatulence, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and gastrointestinal (GI) pain. Nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, and GI pain have been reported in clinical trials using high-dose glutamine 10-30 grams (0.3 grams/kg) in two divided doses daily to treat sickle cell disease (99414). One case of dyspepsia and one case of abdominal pain have been reported in patients taking glutamine 5-15 grams twice daily orally for up to 1 year (96520). In a small trial of healthy males, taking a single dose of about 60 grams (0.9 grams/kg of fat free body mass [FFM]) was associated with a 50% to 79% incidence of GI discomfort, nausea, and belching, compared with a 7% to 28% incidence with a lower dose of about 20 grams (0.3 gram/kg FFM). Flatulence, bloating, lower GI pain, and urge to regurgitate occurred at similar rates regardless of dose, and there were no cases of heartburn, vomiting, or diarrhea/constipation (105013). It is possible that certain GI side effects occur only after multiple doses of glutamine.

Musculoskeletal ...Orally, glutamine 30 grams daily has been associated with cases of musculoskeletal pain and non-cardiac chest pain in clinical trials for patients with sickle cell disease (99414).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, glutamine has been associated with dizziness and headache. A single case of dizziness has been reported in a patient treated with oral glutamine 0.5 grams/kg. However, the symptom resolved after reducing the dose to 0.25 grams/kg (91356). Mania and hypomania have been reported in 2 patients with bipolar disorder taking commercially purchased glutamine up to 4 grams daily (7291). Glutamine is metabolized to glutamate and ammonia, both of which might have neurological effects in people with neurological and psychiatric diseases or in people predisposed to hepatic encephalopathy (7293).

Oncologic ...There is some concern that glutamine might be used by rapidly growing tumors and possibly stimulate tumor growth. Although tumors may utilize glutamine and other amino acids, preliminary research shows that glutamine supplementation does not increase tumor growth (5469,7233,7738). In fact, there is preliminary evidence that glutamine might actually reduce tumor growth (5469).

Other ...Orally, glutamine has been associated with cough when a powdered formulation is used. It is unclear if this was due to accidental inhalation. One case of a burning sensation and one case of hypersplenism has been reported in a patient taking glutamine 5-15 grams twice daily orally for up to 1 year (96520).

(Read more about GLUTAMINE)

General ...Orally, sodium is well tolerated when used in moderation at intakes up to the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level. Topically, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Worsened cardiovascular disease, hypertension, kidney disease.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, intake of sodium above the CDRR intake level can exacerbate hypertension and hypertension-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) (26229,98176,100310,106263). A meta-analysis of observational research has found a linear association between increased sodium intake and increased hypertension risk (109398). Observational research has also found an association between increased sodium salt intake and increased risk of CVD, mortality, and cardiovascular mortality (98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,109395,109396,109399). However, the existing research is unable to confirm a causal relationship between sodium intake and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; high-quality, prospective research is needed to clarify this relationship (100312). As there is no known benefit with increased salt intake that would outweigh the potential increased risk of CVD, advise patients to limit salt intake to no more than the CDRR intake level (100310).
A reduction in sodium intake can lower systolic blood pressure by a small amount in most individuals, and diastolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension (100310,100311,106261). However, post hoc analysis of a small crossover clinical study in White patients suggests that 24-hour blood pressure variability is not affected by high-salt intake compared with low-salt intake (112910). Additionally, the available research is insufficient to confirm that a further reduction in sodium intake below the CDRR intake level will lower the risk for chronic disease (100310,100311). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that reducing sodium intake increases levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides, but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, by a small amount (106261).
It is unclear whether there are safety concerns when sodium is consumed in amounts lower than the adequate intake (AI) levels. Some observational research has found that the lowest levels of sodium intake might be associated with increased risk of death and cardiovascular events (98181,98183). However, this finding has been criticized because some of the studies used inaccurate measures of sodium intake, such as the Kawasaki formula (98177,98178,101259). Some observational research has found that sodium intake based on a single 24-hour urinary measurement is inversely correlated with all-cause mortality (106260). The National Academies Consensus Study Report states that there is insufficient evidence from observational studies to conclude that there are harmful effects from low sodium intake (100310).

Endocrine ...Orally, a meta-analysis of observational research has found that higher sodium intake is associated with an average increase in body mass index (BMI) of 1. 24 kg/m2 and an approximate 5 cm increase in waist circumference (98182). It has been hypothesized that the increase in BMI is related to an increased thirst, resulting in an increased intake of sugary beverages and/or consumption of foods that are high in salt and also high in fat and energy (98182). One large observational study has found that the highest sodium intake is not associated with overweight or obesity when compared to the lowest intake in adolescents aged 12-19 years when intake of energy and sugar-sweetened beverages are considered (106265). However, in children aged 6-11 years, usual sodium intake is positively associated with increased weight and central obesity independently of the intake of energy and/or sugar-sweetened beverages (106265).

Gastrointestinal ...In one case report, severe gastritis and a deep antral ulcer occurred in a patient who consumed 16 grams of sodium chloride in one sitting (25759). Chronic use of high to moderately high amounts of sodium chloride has been associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer (29405).

Musculoskeletal ...Observational research has found that low sodium levels can increase the risk for osteoporosis. One study has found that low plasma sodium levels are associated with an increased risk for osteoporosis. Low levels, which are typically caused by certain disease states or chronic medications, are associated with a more than 2-fold increased odds for osteoporosis and bone fractures (101260).
Conversely, in healthy males on forced bed rest, a high intake of sodium chloride (7.7 mEq/kg daily) seems to exacerbate disuse-induced bone and muscle loss (25760,25761).

Oncologic ...Population research has found that high or moderately high intake of sodium chloride is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer when compared with low sodium chloride intake (29405). Other population research in patients with gastric cancer has found that a high intake of sodium is associated with an approximate 65% increased risk of gastric cancer mortality when compared with a low intake. When zinc intake is taken into consideration, the increased risk of mortality only occurred in those with low zinc intake, but the risk was increased to approximately 2-fold in this sub-population (109400).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...In patients with hypertension, population research has found that sodium excretion is modestly and positively associated with having moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea. This association was not found in normotensive patients (106262).

Renal ...Increased sodium intake has been associated with impaired kidney function in healthy adults. This effect seems to be independent of blood pressure. Observational research has found that a high salt intake over approximately 5 years is associated with a 29% increased risk of developing impaired kidney function when compared with a lower salt intake. In this study, high salt intake was about 2-fold higher than low salt intake (101261).

(Read more about SODIUM)