Platinum Hydro Builder Chocolate Shake by ON Optimum Nutrition

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Although there has been interest in using oral alanine for BPH, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alanine for this purpose.
• Cognitive function. Oral alanine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults with fatigue shows that taking alanine 1 gram, along with serine, glutamate, aspartate, and tyrosine daily for 4 weeks improves some measures of cognitive function including attention, spatial cognition, orientation, motivation, and time management when compared with placebo (111249). It is unclear if these effects are due to alanine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Diabetes. Although there has been interest in using oral alanine for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alanine for this purpose.
• Diarrhea-related dehydration. It is unclear if oral alanine is beneficial in children or adults with diarrhea-related dehydration. Details: One preliminary clinical trial in males age 6-59 years with severe secretory diarrhea primarily related to cholera or enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli shows that an oral rehydration solution fortified with L-alpha-alanine 90 mmol/L, along with a reduced glucose concentration, is significantly more effective for reducing stool output than the standard WHO solution (16028). However, other clinical research in males age 3-48 months of age with diarrhea primarily related to viral infections shows that an oral rehydration solution fortified with L-alpha-alanine 30-90 mmol/L along with a reduced glucose concentration is not significantly more effective at reducing stool output than the standard WHO oral rehydration solution (16021).
• Fatigue. Oral alanine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults with fatigue shows that taking alanine 1 gram, along with serine, glutamate, aspartate, and tyrosine daily for 4 weeks does not improve subjective or objective measures of fatigue when compared with placebo (111249).
• Glycogen storage disease type II (Pompe disease). It is unclear if oral alanine is beneficial in patients with Pompe disease. Details: A case series of 5 patients aged 15-47 years with late-onset glycogen storage disease type II shows that taking L-alpha-alanine 0.14 grams/kg daily, divided into 3 doses, for 4 weeks decreased resting energy expenditure, protein turnover, and catabolism when compared with baseline. However, measures of Pompe disease-associated myopathy were not reported. The validity of this study is limited by its small size and the lack of a comparator group (16444).
• Hypoglycemia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral alanine may modestly reduce iatrogenic hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking 20-40 grams of L-alpha-alanine orally produces a sustained rise in blood glucose levels after insulin-induced hypoglycemia in people with type 1 diabetes (14612,16020). The rise is more prolonged than after 20 grams of oral glucose or 1 mg of subcutaneous glucagon (14612). Other preliminary clinical research also shows that patients with type 1 diabetes had more consistent and prolonged protection against nocturnal hypoglycemia after taking 40 grams of L-alpha-alanine plus 10 grams of glucose orally with a bedtime dose of NPH insulin than when they consumed a snack with the insulin dose (16019).
• Schizophrenia. It is unclear if oral alanine is beneficial in patients with schizophrenia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking D-alpha-alanine orally 100 mg/kg daily for 6 weeks improves positive and negative symptom scores in patients with schizophrenia that were also on a stable antipsychotic regimen when compared with placebo (16027).
• Stress. Although there has been interest in using oral alanine for stress, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alanine for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate alanine for these uses.

(Read more about ALANINE)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral beet may improve athletic performance associated with aerobic activities. However, it is not clear who is most likely to benefit, for which type of competition it is most useful, or what dose or duration of use is most appropriate. Details: Several small clinical trials, most of which enrolled elite athletes, recreational athletes, and sedentary males, as well as meta-analyses of some of these and other studies, show that beet improves various measures of athletic performance, including ability, muscular endurance, power output, sprinting, and strength (93844,94464,94468,94469,100143,100150,100152,105761,113422). Clinical research also shows that drinking beetroot juice improves the use of oxygen during exercise testing in recreationally-trained athletes, especially with severe exercise testing (94460,94463,94467,100147,105762). Also, in obese adolescents, taking beetroot juice daily for 6 days increases the time to exhaustion from severe exercise, but does not improve moderate exercise (100145). Not all research shows that beet supplementation benefits athletic performance. Another meta-analysis of several small clinical studies, including some of the studies above, shows that taking beetroot does not improve performance in high-intensity or sprint interval training (111159). Additionally, the majority of research in elite athletes does not support the use of beetroot juice to decrease the time needed to complete a task, aid in some sort of graded exercise test, or improve the use of oxygen during exercise testing (94455,94458,94460,94461,94464,94465,94466,94469,94473,100142,100153,105763). The supposed lack of effect of beetroot juice in elite athletes might be related to the natural production of nitrates and nitrites in the body or the increased ability to use oxygen that comes from extensive training (94458,94463). Alternatively, any changes might be very small (<1%) and not identified with statistical comparisons, although even very small changes might be beneficial in competition (94464). The most commonly used doses in all studies, regardless of effect, have included an acute dose of beetroot juice 70-500 mL up to 3 hours prior to exercise (93844,94463,94464,94466,94467,94473,97726,100142,100143,105761)(105762,111159,113422) or chronic dosing of up to 500 mL daily for 3-6 days (94459,94464,94469,100145,100147,100153,111159,113422). Less commonly, beetroot juice 70-140 mL daily, betalain-rich concentrate 100 mg daily, or a beetroot-based nutritional gel 100 grams daily, have been taken for longer dosing schedules of 7-15 days (97720,100144,100148,100152,105763,113422). Benefits in elite athletes, most often related to time trials, are usually limited to studies using chronic dosing of 7-15 days, which is longer than the duration of 6 days used in the majority of studies (94473,97720,100144,100148). Brands of juice used in clinical trials have included Beet It Sport (James White Drinks Ltd.) (94455,94458,94465,100142,100143,100144,100148,105761,105763), Beet It Stamina Shot (James White Drinks Ltd.) (93844), Beet It (James White Drinks Ltd) (94457,94459,94460,94467,94469,97726,100145,100153,105762,111159), and Love Beets Beetroot Juice (Gs Fresh Ltd.) (94461,94462). Although plasma levels have not been analyzed in all studies, the majority of studies suggest that these doses are adequate to increase levels of nitrates or nitrites, which is thought to be essential for increasing athletic potential (93844,94455,94458,94459,94460,94465,94467,94469,94466,94473,97726). The evidence also suggests benefit in both normoxic and hypoxic environments (94465,100148,105763).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Drinking beetroot juice 7-8 times over 48 hours after strenuous exercise may reduce exercise-induced muscle soreness, but evidence is conflicting. Details: Some clinical research shows drinking beetroot juice (Love Beets Beetroot Juice, Gs Fresh Ltd.) 125 mL or 250 mL seven times over 48 hours after strenuous box jumps improves muscle soreness when compared with placebo and sodium nitrite (96964,97722). Other small clinical studies show that drinking beetroot juice 50-250 mL as eight separate doses over 48 hours after strenuous exerciseimproves muscle soreness and reduces tissue edema when compared with placebo (94461,113424). However, drinking beetroot juice 250 mL as seven separate doses over 48 hours after running a marathon does not appear to reduce muscle soreness when compared with placebo (94462). A meta-analysis of 4 small studies, mostly in healthy or physically active males, shows that drinking beetroot juice improves the pressure pain threshold, which is a measure of muscle soreness, at 48- and 72-hours post-exercise when compared with a fruit-flavored drink. However, beetroot juice does not improve subjective muscle soreness scores (111160). The validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the beetroot juice regimens among the included studies. Further, these results should not be generalized to elite athletes.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Drinking beetroot juice for up to 14 days may not improve exercise capacity in patients with COPD. Details: A meta-analysis of eight small clinical trials in patients with COPD shows that taking nitrate-rich beetroot juice does not improve most measures of exercise capacity, including the 6-minute walk test, cycling ergometry endurance time, and maximum rate of oxygen consumption (VO2 max), when compared with placebo. Additionally, beetroot juice did not reduce blood pressure or heart rate. However, the analysis did show a significant improvement in scores on the Borg Rating of Perceived Exhaustion scale with beetroot juice over placebo. Nitrate-rich beetroot juice doses ranged from 70-140 mL daily for up to 14 days (104200).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Cognitive function. It is unclear if drinking beetroot juice is beneficial for cognitive function. Details: A small clinical study in adults with overweight or obesity on a calorie-restricted diet shows that drinking 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice daily for 14 days improves the time to complete part B of the trail making test, which is a test of cognitive function, but not part A, when compared with controls (111158). However, the duration and size of this study limits its validity. Further, it is unclear whether any improvement is clinically significant. The effect of acute beet administration on cognitive function has also been studied. A very small clinical study in healthy adults shows that taking beet extract (RedNite, Enovate Biolife) chewable tablets 3 grams 90 minutes prior to neuropsychological testing improves immediate and delayed memory capacity, frontal lobe function, and lexical flexibility but does not improve working memory, information processing speed, or subjective reports of memory performance when compared with placebo (113427).
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). It is unclear if oral beetroot extract is beneficial in patients with CHD. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with CHD shows that taking red beetroot extract 500 mg, containing around 25 mg betalains, twice daily for 2 weeks reduces total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 15 mg/dL and reduces triglycerides by 8 mg/dL when compared to baseline. Slight improvements in blood pressure and blood glucose were also reported, but these changes were not clinically significant (103883). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Also, it is unclear whether beetroot can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with CHD.
• Dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral beetroot is beneficial in patients with dyslipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in healthy individuals or patients with dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease, or overweight or obesity, shows that consuming beetroot juice or leaves does not improve levels of triglycerides or total, low-density lipoprotein, or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol when compared with controls (111163). However, the validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the enrolled patients and beetroot regimens.
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice improves recovery from muscle damage after exercise. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 small clinical studies in healthy or physically active individuals, most of which enrolled males only, shows that drinking beetroot juice improves measures of muscle recovery at 72 hours post-exercise when compared with a fruit-flavored drink. However, beetroot juice does not consistently improve recovery at earlier time points post-exercise, nor does it reduce levels of creatine kinase or markers of inflammation (i.e., interleukin-6, interleukin-8, c-reactive protein, or tumor necrosis factor-alpha) (111160). However, the validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the beetroot juice regimens among the included studies, which usually varied from 210-250 mg of nitrate in 7-11 servings over 3-7 days. Further, these results should not be generalized to elite athletes. Another very small clinical study in semi-professional female athletes shows that ingesting beetroot juice 50 mL 8 times over 48 hours after exercise-induced muscle damage enhances the recovery of some functional parameters such as muscle endurance but not others such as flexibility and vertical jump performance when compared with placebo (113424).
• Hypertension. Oral beet may slightly reduce blood pressure in healthy individuals, but it is unclear if it is beneficial in patients with hypertension. Details: Meta-analyses of small studies show the potential for a minor reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in healthy adults taking beetroot juice (94470,97718,97728). The average reduction in SBP and DBP with beetroot juice consumption is about 4 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, which is greater than the effect seen with consuming blackcurrant juice or nitrate-depleted beetroot juice. The most benefit is seen when beetroot juice is taken for at least 2 weeks or at doses of 500 mL daily (97728). The effect of acute beet supplementation on blood pressure is conflicting. A small clinical study in healthy adults shows that drinking beet juice (Beet It, James White Company) 140 mL two hours prior to cardiovascular measurements reduces resting SBP by about 4 mmHg but does not improve resting or post-exercise DBP, central blood pressure, or arterial stiffness nor does it improve post-exercise SBP when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis suggests that the reductions in resting SBP were only observed in males, not females (113423). Another small clinical study shows that consuming beet 100 grams baked into bread modestly decreases DBP over a 6-hour period when compared with white bread (97725). It is possible that genetics might play a role in the magnitude of effect seen with beetroot consumption. Adults with a specific gene polymorphism, eNOS Glu298Asp, experienced a greater reduction in DBP after consuming beet-containing bread (97724). Despite positive findings in studies of healthy individuals, research on the use of beetroot juice in patients with hypertension is unclear. A small clinical study in adults with hypertension who were taking antihypertensive medications shows that drinking nitrate-rich beetroot juice (Beet it; James White Drinks Ltd.) 70 mL twice daily for one week does not lower blood pressure when compared with nitrate-depleted beetroot juice (94457). Also, in patients with mild to moderate hypertension, clinical research shows that taking a combination of beetroot powder (Sensient) 300 mg, olive leaf extract 1000 mg, and green coffee bean extract 200 mg daily for 6 weeks does not lower blood pressure when compared with placebo (97723). However, some evidence suggests that at least part of the blood pressure lowering effects of beet might be independent of nitrate (97728). Furthermore, some research suggests that identifying effects on blood pressure might be dependent on the method of measurement, including clinic resting measurements, 24-hour monitoring, or morning/evening home resting measurements (97729).
• Hypertriglyceridemia. It is unclear if oral beet is beneficial in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Details: A small clinical study in overweight or obese individuals with dyslipidemia shows that taking freeze-dried beet leaf 2.8 grams daily for 4 weeks in addition to nutritional guidance does not lower triglyceride levels when compared with nutritional guidance alone (100146). Beet has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical trial in patients at risk for heart disease shows that a specific combination of beet and hawthorn berry (Neo40-Daily, Neogenis Labs), taken twice daily for 30 days, can modestly reduce blood triglyceride levels when compared to baseline (18222). It is unclear if these findings are due to beet, hawthorn berry, or the combination.
• Liver disease. Although there has been interest in using oral beet for liver disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of beet for this purpose.
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial for muscle strength. Details: A meta-analysis of 18 clinical studies in healthy males shows that taking beetroot juice or beetroot gel 2-3 hours before exercise improves muscular strength when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis suggests that beetroot-based supplements improve muscular strength in a fatigued but not resting state (113422). A small clinical study in adults with overweight or obesity on a calorie-restricted diet shows that drinking 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice daily for 14 days improves handgrip strength by approximately 18% compared with 4% in controls (111158). However, it is unclear whether any improvement is clinically significant.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral beet leaf or beetroot juice is beneficial for weight loss. Details: A small clinical study in patients with overweight or obesity and dyslipidemia shows that taking freeze-dried beet leaf 2.8 grams daily for 4 weeks in addition to nutritional guidance does not reduce body weight or body mass index (BMI) when compared with nutritional guidance alone (100146). Similarly, a small clinical study in adults with overweight or obesity on a calorie-restricted diet shows that drinking 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice daily for 14 days does not improve weight loss when compared with controls (111158). However, the size and duration of this study may have been inadequate to detect differences between groups.
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension. Details: A small clinical trial in pregnant patients with hypertension who are at approximately 22-35 weeks gestation shows that taking beetroot juice (James White Drinks Ltd) 70 mL daily for 8 days does not reduce blood pressure when compared with a nitrate-depleted beetroot juice (100151). However, the study was small and designed to investigate the feasibility of using beetroot juice in this population.
• Pulmonary hypertension. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking beetroot juice (Beet-It Sport; James White Drinks Ltd) 70 mL twice daily for 7 days does not improve right ventricular systolic function when compared with nitrate-depleted beetroot juice in patients with pulmonary hypertension (100149). However, this study was small and not adequately powered to detect differences between groups.
• Raynaud syndrome. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial in patients with Raynaud syndrome. Details: A small clinical study in patients with Raynaud syndrome undergoing cold sensitivity tests shows that drinking beetroot juice (Beet-It, James White Drinks Ltd) 70 mL daily for 13 days, followed by 140 mL prior to testing, does not reduce pain in the hands or feet, but might improve thermal comfort in the feet, when compared to baseline (103884). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. More evidence is needed to rate beet for these uses.

(Read more about BEET)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for allergic rhinitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Atherosclerosis. Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for atherosclerosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Diarrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for diarrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Dyspepsia. Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for indigestion caused by hypochlorhydria, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Food allergies. Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for food allergies, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Gallbladder disease. Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for gallbladder disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Hyperhomocysteinemia. Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for hyperhomocysteinemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Hypothyroidism. Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for hypothyroidism, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for RA, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate betaine hydrochloride for these uses.

(Read more about BETAINE HYDROCHLORIDE)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Hepatic encephalopathy. Oral and intravenous BCAAs improve symptoms and nutritional status in patients with hepatic encephalopathy, especially in those not tolerating protein supplementation. Details: Taking BCAAs 240 mg/kg (up to 25 grams) daily in 3 divided doses for up to 3 months can improve symptoms, liver function tests, and nitrogen balance in patients with chronic hepatic encephalopathy (68,69,82,690,92643,97531). Oral BCAAs are recommended for malnourished patients with chronic hepatic encephalopathy who cannot tolerate protein supplementation (69,4274). When the enteral route is unavailable and when patients cannot tolerate general purpose amino acid solutions, intravenous solutions with BCAAs can be used for nutritional support; however, most patients can tolerate standard amino acid mixtures (4274). Some clinical research also suggests that taking BCAAs orally improves psychomotor function, attention, intelligence, and driving ability in patients with latent hepatic encephalopathy (684,685,37131,97531). However, not all studies show a positive effect of BCAAs on psychometric outcomes (37135). There is also some preliminary evidence that intravenous BCAAs might be helpful for reversing coma in acute hepatic encephalopathy, although findings are conflicting (66,81,686,687,688,689,4274,37134). BCAAs do not appear to reduce the risk of mortality or improve quality of life in patients with hepatic encephalopathy (92643,97531).
• Tardive dyskinesia. Oral BCAAs might reduce symptoms of tardive dyskinesia precipitated by antipsychotic drugs. Details: Taking BCAAs orally seems to reduce symptoms of tardive dyskinesia (72,10146,13307). Clinical research in adult and pediatric patients who are taking antipsychotic drugs shows that taking a drink containing BCAAs 222 mg/kg three times daily for 3 weeks reduces tardive dyskinesia movements by 30% to 60% when compared with placebo (10146,13307).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Liver cancer. Oral BCAAs do not seem to improve outcomes or reduce the risk for recurrence in patients with liver cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of the available clinical research, as well as individual clinical studies, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma show that consuming up to 50 grams of BCAAs twice daily for up to 4 years does not improve survival, reduce tumor recurrence, or reduce the risk of complications such as ascites following liver resection when compared with a control group receiving no intervention (37143,92646,97532,105578). However, one small clinical study suggests that BCAAs may be beneficial in patients recently diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma that does not require surgery. Taking two packets of a specific supplement (Aminoleban EN) daily containing a total of L-leucine 4 grams, L-isoleucine 3.8 grams, and L-valine 3.2 grams, starting two weeks before receiving transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation and continuing for up to 5 years, reduces recurrence of liver cancer and increases event-free survival when compared with placebo (97533). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the high withdrawal rate in this study.

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). Overall, oral BCAAs are not beneficial and might even lead to worsened outcomes in patients with ALS. Details: Although early studies have indicated that taking BCAAs might be beneficial in ALS, more recent studies show no benefit and a possible increased loss of pulmonary function and higher rate of mortality among patients using BCAAs (678,679,680,681,37154).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if dietary BCAAs prevent Alzheimer disease. Details: Observational research has found that higher blood levels of BCAAs are associated with an 11% to 13% lower risk of Alzheimer disease; however, when research was adjusted for mortality, body mass index, and concomitant cholesterol-lowering medications, the association was no longer significant (100469).
• Athletic performance. Small clinical trials suggest that although oral BCAAs may not enhance athletic performance, they may modestly reduce perceived exertion and fatigue with some forms of exercise. Details: In most studies, taking BCAAs orally does not enhance athletic performance (692,1135,37080,37094,37106,37123,37141,37142,37151,92641). For instance, BCAAs do not appear to improve strength or work power or to reduce completion times for long-distance running or cycling trials (692,37106,37112,37141,37142,92641). However, most research shows that BCAAs are beneficial for reducing exercise-induced fatigue and perceived exertion after prolonged or intense exercise, exercise in the heat, or exercise following glycogen depletion (692,37112,37124,37144,92642,92644,92645,92648,97529,97530)(97535,105582). In many cases, this improvement is observed when BCAAs are taken in combination with arginine, citrulline, or green tea powder (37124,92642,92645,92648,97529,100462). However, some conflicting evidence exists (1135,37080,37094). Overall, the validity of these findings is limited because most studies differ widely in the amount and type of product consumed. For example, studied doses included BCAAs 0.17-0.3 mg/kg daily; or valine 0.5-1.7 grams, leucine 1-3.5 grams, and isoleucine 0.48-2.1 grams given before and/or after exercise (37108,37123,92642,92644,92645). Other limitations include variability in the studied endpoints and control comparisons used.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: One small clinical study shows that consuming a tyrosine-free amino acid drink containing 60 grams of the BCAAs leucine, isoleucine, and valine in a ratio of 3:3:4, reduces acute manic symptoms within 6 hours when compared with placebo. When taken daily for 7 days, it seems to continue to improve symptoms over a 2-week period (10117).
• Cachexia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with cachexia from various causes. Details: Preliminary clinical research in elderly malnourished patients receiving hemodialysis shows that taking a combination of BCAAs 4 grams three times daily improves appetite and caloric intake and increases plasma albumin levels and anthropometric measurements when compared with placebo (10147). Also, small clinical studies in adults with cachexia due to cancer or cirrhosis show that taking oral BCAAs 2.4 grams twice daily for 1 year or 4.8 grams 3 times daily for 1 week might be helpful when compared to baseline (71,37090). This finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. A small clinical study in adults with congestive heart failure who have lost at least 7.5% of dry weight over the past 6 months or have a body mass index below 20 kg/m² shows that taking BCAAs 10 grams every evening at bedtime for 8 weeks improves physical and emotional quality of life scores, appetite, and fatigue when compared with placebo. Patients taking melatonin 20 mg nightly in addition to BCAA supplementation observed greater improvements in appetite and fatigue when compared with placebo (108478). However, a statistical comparison of outcomes between the groups taking BCAA alone or BCAA with melatonin was not provided.
• Cancer. It is unclear if dietary BCAA consumption improves cancer-related mortality. Details: Observational research in adults has found that consuming BCAAs 19 grams or more daily as part of the diet is not associated with a reduced risk of cancer-related mortality when compared with a lower dietary BCAA intake of less than 7.8 grams daily (108467). The validity of this finding is limited due to unclear reporting; additionally, dietary intake was recorded from a single survey.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if dietary BCAA consumption reduces the risk of CVD-related mortality. Details: Observational research in adults has found that CVD-related mortality is not associated with dietary BCAA intake or with individual leucine, isoleucine, or valine intake (108467). The validity of this meta-analysis is limited due to unclear reporting; additionally dietary intake was recorded from a single survey.
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral BCAAs can improve physical performance in adults with COPD. Details: A clinical study in adults with stable, stage 2 or 3 COPD undergoing a pulmonary rehabilitation program shows that taking a BCAA powder 4.3 grams, diluted in water and consumed once daily for 4 weeks, may improve recovery after exercise, but does not impact maximal exercise capacity, functional and muscular performance, or quality of life when compared with placebo (108464). The validity of these findings is limited due to the short duration of treatment.
• Cirrhosis. Most small studies suggest that BCAAs may modestly improve certain measures in some patients with liver cirrhosis. Details: One small clinical study shows that although taking BCAAs 14.4 grams daily for 12 months does not improve survival or liver function in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis, the number of hospitalizations and prevalence of cachexia are reduced and quality of life is improved when compared with control or whey protein (37090). A clinical study in patients with sarcopenia and liver cirrhosis shows that taking BCAAs 7.2 grams for 6 months decreases bilirubin levels and improves Child-Turcotte-Pugh and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores when compared with baseline (108468). Although the study enrolled a control group (whey protein), the investigators did not provide a statistical comparison of outcomes between groups. In addition, a small study in Japanese patients with cirrhosis shows that taking BCAAs 12.45 grams daily for at least 12 months improves liver function and reduces liver complications by 50% to 60% over 3-5 years when compared with control (37120). Also, taking a specific product (Livact, Samil Pharmaceutical) providing the same dose for 11-22 months improves liver function by a small to moderate amount over a 24-month period when compared with not taking BCAAs. There was also a moderate reduction in the rate of developing or worsening major complications such as ascites or hepatic encephalopathy (103351). However, some research providing BCAAs as part of a late evening snack has found no benefit. In one small study, consuming BCAAs as part of a late evening snack in an undefined dose for 3 months does not seem to improve quality of life when compared with a late evening snack without BCAAs (37101). Also, a very small clinical study in patients with abnormal glucose metabolism related to cirrhosis shows that consuming BCAAs in an undefined dose as part of a late evening snack for 1 week does not improve glycemic control when compared with baseline. Instead, glucose levels increased in some patients (103348). It is possible that the doses provided in these latter studies were lower than those used in the studies showing benefit. Additionally, these very small studies may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if dietary BCAAs are beneficial or harmful in patients with colorectal cancer. Details: An observational study in Italy has found that increased dietary intake of BCAAs is associated with a lower risk of developing sigmoid colon cancer, but not overall colorectal cancer risk, when compared with lower intake (105584). However, there's some concern that increased dietary BCAAs may have negative effects in patients who have been diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Observational research in patients living in the US has found that higher dietary intake of BCAAs is associated with a slightly higher risk of all-cause mortality when compared with lower intake (105581).
• Dementia. It is unclear if dietary BCAAs help to prevent dementia. Details: Observational research has found that higher blood levels of BCAAs are associated with a 13% to 17% lower risk of dementia. The lowered risk was maintained when research was adjusted for mortality, body mass index, and concomitant cholesterol-lowering medications (100469).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if dietary BCAAs reduce the risk for developing diabetes. Details: Some population research in Japanese females has found a decreased risk of diabetes associated with higher intake of BCAAs (97543). However, other observational research in people from the US has found that increased dietary intake of BCAAs is associated with an increased risk of diabetes (97536). Reasons for the conflicting finding are not entirely clear. Some evidence suggests that the dietary pattern of BCAA intake, rather than the total intake, may influence the risk of diabetes. Also, there is some speculation that differences in gut microbiota may attribute to the observed differences in diabetes risk associated with BCAA intake (100465). Prospective clinical research is needed to determine whether this association is causal or correlative.
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. Small studies suggest that BCAAs might reduce some, but not all, markers of muscle damage caused by exercise. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies shows that supplementation with BCAAs reduces creatine kinase (CK) levels 24 hours post-exercise, but not 48 hours post-exercise. Additionally, this analysis shows that lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels are not affected by BCAA supplementation (97534). The validity of this analysis was limited because baseline dietary protein consumption was not taken into consideration as a potential confounder. A separate meta-analysis of clinical research in trained male athletes performing various resistance exercises shows that taking BCAAs 0.2-1.76 grams/kg for 1-28 days improves CK levels immediately following exercise, and at 24 and 48 hours post-exercise, but does not reduce LDH levels at any timepoint, when compared with placebo or control (108469). Most doses of BCAAs studied consisted of a 2:1:1 ratio of leucine, isoleucine, and valine, respectively. The validity of these findings is limited due to the short duration of treatment and various doses studied. Small individual clinical trials show that taking BCAAs does not affect urinary myoglobin after a marathon nor plasma myoglobin or CK levels after isotonic muscular exercise (37123,92641,100471). The benefits of BCAAs might depend on baseline protein consumption. A small clinical study in resistance trained males shows that adding BCAAs 0.22 grams/kg (MusclePharm BCAA) daily for 8 days to a high daily protein consumption of 1.2 grams/kg does not attenuate muscle damage or improve muscle recovery when compared with placebo (100471). Conversely, a meta-analysis of clinical research in adults completing various exercises shows that taking BCAAs consisting of any combination of valine, leucine, and isoleucine ratios modestly reduces CK, LDH, and myoglobin 24 and 48 hours post-exercise, but does not improve muscle recovery or muscle force after exercise, when compared with placebo (108471). The validity of these findings is limited due to unclear reporting.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Limited evidence suggests that oral BCAAs may modestly attenuate exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: One meta-analysis shows that taking BCAAs does not reduce delayed-onset muscle soreness after exercise when assessed at the individual time points of 24, 48, or 72 hours (97534). However, when results of all time points are pooled together in two separate meta-analyses, supplementation modestly reduces soreness after exercise (97534,103353). Most, but not all, individual trials also show that taking BCAAs in various doses, such as 0.087 grams/kg or 5-10 grams before and/or after exercise, modestly reduces muscle soreness after exercise (37108,37123,37124,92648,97530,97535,100467,100471,103346,108471). The validity of these individual trials is limited by their small sample sizes, variable dosing regimens, and enrolled populations, which were mainly limited to young untrained adult males (97534,103353). A separate meta-analysis of clinical research in trained male athletes performing various resistance exercises shows that taking BCAAs 0.2-1.76 grams/kg for 1-28 days may improve muscle soreness during the first 24 hours after exercise, but not at 24 or 48 hours post-exercise, when compared with placebo or control (108469). The validity of these findings is limited due to the short duration of treatment and various doses studied. Also, it is not clear whether taking BCAAs before or after a workout may be more beneficial. Some research found a nonsignificant trend toward reduced muscle soreness when consuming a specific product (Aminofeel, Seikatsu Bunkasya Co. Ltd.) containing BCAAs 3.2 grams three times daily starting 3 days before working out and continuing 3 days after, when compared to control (100467). More research is needed to determine the best dosing regimen and which populations, if any, may benefit.
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with heart failure. Details: A small clinical study in patients with heart failure and hypoalbuminemia shows that taking a specific packet of BCAA granules (LIVACT, Ajinomoto Co) containing L-valine 1144 mg, L-leucine 1904 mg, and L-isoleucine 952 mg, three times daily for at least 7 days and stopping after discharge from the hospital, does not affect serum albumin or cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) when compared with placebo (100470). It is possible that this study was underpowered to detect differences between groups. Another small clinical study in adults with chronic heart failure participating in a cardiac rehabilitation program shows that taking a specific oral supplement (Meiji Mei Balance Rehasupport Mini; Meiji Group) containing BCAAs 2.5 grams and various vitamins, minerals, and whey protein, twice daily for 12 weeks increases fat mass, but has no effect on peak oxygen uptake, 6-minute walking distance, or strength parameters, when compared with no supplementation (108470). It is unclear if these effects are due to BCAAs, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Hepatitis. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with hepatitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with alcoholic hepatitis shows that taking BCAAs 20 grams daily orally or enterally for 3 weeks or until discharge, in combination with a controlled diet, does not reduce the risk of mortality when compared with conventional protein or a controlled diet alone (37133).
• Inflammatory myopathies. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Details: A small clinical study in adults with suspected or confirmed polymyositis or dermatomyositis who are receiving standard corticosteroid therapy shows that a BCAA-specific product containing L-isoleucine 952 mg, L-leucine 1904 mg, and L-valine 1144 mg for 12-28 weeks, taken as two packages three times daily for a total daily dose of 24 grams, does not improve manual muscle test scores or clinical response at 12 and 28 weeks when compared with placebo (108477).
• Obesity. It is unclear of oral BCAAs can reduce the likelihood of developing obesity or improve weight loss in adults with overweight or obesity. Details: Some observational research has found that higher dietary intake of BCAAs is associated with lower odds of obesity when compared with a lower intake (100466). Conversely, a large observational study in adults in Iran, including those who are overweight or obese, has found that the highest dietary intake of BCAAs is associated with a 24% higher likelihood of general obesity in males, but not in females, when compared with the lowest dietary BCAA intake (108465). This study did not report ranges for highest and lowest BCAA intake, limiting the validity of this study. BCAAs have also been evaluated in adults with overweight or obesity. A small clinical study in obese females that underwent a 4-week calorie-restricted diet shows that taking 6 caplets daily containing a total of L-leucine 3 grams, L-isoleucine 1.5 grams, and L-valine 1.5 grams in addition to vitamin B6 40 mg daily for 4 weeks does not further reduce weight, but may slightly preserve lean body mass, when compared with placebo (100464). Another small clinical study in overweight and obese adults shows that taking BCAAs 0.1 gram/kg daily in addition to starting a low-calorie diet for 16 weeks does not improve weight loss, but may preserve lean muscle mass, when compared with taking placebo while following the low-calorie diet (105583).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if dietary BCAA consumption reduces the risk of all-cause mortality. Details: Observational research in adults has found that total BCAA intake, as well as isoleucine intake, is associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality, particularly in those with higher serum triglyceride concentrations (108467). However, this association was not present for leucine or valine intake. The validity of this meta-analysis is limited due to unclear reporting; additionally dietary intake was recorded from a single survey.
• Pancreatic cancer. The association between dietary BCAA intake and pancreatic cancer risk is unclear. Details: Observational research in adults in Italy has found that consuming BCAAs as part of the diet in quantities greater than 18 grams daily is associated with a 2-fold increased risk of pancreatic cancer when compared with less than 12 grams daily. This relationship was stronger in younger males, those with higher body mass indexes, and in those who smoke or have high alcohol intake (108476). Dietary information was recorded from a single, weekly consumption questionnaire.
• Phenylketonuria (PKU). It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with PKU. Details: A small clinical trial in adolescents and young adults with PKU shows that taking BCAAs, consisting of valine 150 mg/kg, isoleucine 150 mg/kg, and leucine 200 mg/kg, with meals and at bedtime for up to 6 months seems to improve attention and processing when compared with a control group (37127).
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial for improving physical function and muscle strength in older adults. Details: In malnourished elderly individuals, preliminary clinical research shows that taking a supplement providing BCAAs 5000 mg daily, in addition to other amino acids, vitamin B6, and vitamin B1 (Aminotrofic) for 2 months, does not improve muscle mass, muscle strength, or physical function to a greater extent than dietary advice intended to maximize nutritional intake from food and drink (103349). Similarly, a clinical study in middle aged and elderly adults shows that a specific product (Sarcojoint; Orient Euro Pharma, Inc) containing leucine 1 gram, arginine, vitamin D3, glucosamine, chondroitin, and calcium, taken twice daily in addition to regular resistance exercise for 12 weeks, does not improve muscle strength, muscle mass, or physical performance when compared with taking an unspecified vitamin B supplement twice daily with regular exercise (108472). Conversely, one small clinical study in older adults who have had a hip replacement shows that taking BCAAs 1.2 grams and lysine 1.8 grams (Amino-aile, Ajinomoto Co., Inc.) daily for one month after undergoing exercise therapy sessions modestly increases the strength of both legs and arms when compared with taking starch. However, there was no effect on hip abductor strength of the operated leg or on grip strength or measures of independence (103347).
• Postoperative infection. There is limited evidence on the intravenous and oral use of BCAAs for reducing infection after oncologic surgery. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 small heterogeneous clinical trials in patients after oncologic surgery, mostly for liver cancer, suggests that receiving oral or intravenous BCAAs reduces the risk of postoperative infection by 38% when compared with control (105577).
• Postoperative recovery. There is limited evidence on the intravenous and oral use of BCAAs for improving postoperative recovery after oncologic surgery. Details: A meta-analysis of small heterogeneous clinical trials in patients after oncologic surgery, mostly for liver cancer, suggests that receiving oral or intravenous BCAAs reduces hospital stay by about 2 days, but does not reduce mortality or post-operative complications, when compared with control (105577).
• Psychological well-being. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial for psychological well-being. Details: A cross-sectional observational study has found that higher dietary consumption of BCAAs is associated with a lower risk of anxiety and depression when compared with lower consumption (105579).
• Sarcopenia. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with primary sarcopenia or in those with sarcopenia related to liver cirrhosis. Details: A small clinical study in postmenopausal adults at risk for sarcopenia shows that consuming BCAAs 9 grams daily for 8 weeks in addition to resistance training increases strength and muscle mass when compared with baseline, but is no different than resistance training plus a placebo (105576). Another small clinical study in adults 65 years or older with sarcopenia shows that taking a supplement containing BCAAs 2500 mg, vitamin D 500 IU, protein, and other vitamins daily for 8 weeks in addition to resistance training does not improve physical function when compared with resistance training alone. The supplement did seem to slightly improve handgrip strength and body mass when compared with no supplementation (100468). However, overall the study was inadequately powered to detect smaller effects on physical function and muscle mass. There is also interest in using BCCAs in patients with sarcopenia and liver cirrhosis. A clinical study in this population shows that taking BCAAs 7.2 grams (containing 1.2 grams of L-leucine, 600 mg of L-isoleucine, and 600 mg of L-valine) daily for 6 months improves handgrip strength, gait speed, and muscle mass when compared with baseline (108468). Although the study enrolled a control group (whey protein), the investigators did not provide a statistical comparison of outcomes between groups. A separate meta-analysis of low-quality clinical research in this population shows that taking BCAAs has no effect on handgrip strength when compared with no supplementation (108473). Although other outcomes were evaluated, results are inconclusive due to the limited number of studies available for each outcome.
• Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients with SCA. Details: Although there is some preliminary clinical evidence that oral BCAAs might have a beneficial effect on symptoms of SCA (73), a small clinical crossover study shows that taking a particular BCAA compound (Livact) 4.5-18 grams daily for 4 weeks does not improve ataxia in patients with SCA when compared with placebo (37088).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral BCAAs are beneficial in patients recovering from stroke. Details:A small nonblinded, clinical study in elderly patients with subacute stroke and sarcopenia currently undergoing intensive inpatient rehabilitation therapy shows that administering a specific product (Seniup; Enterogenomics Co) containing BCAAs 6 grams, given twice daily orally or by feeding tube for 1 month, modestly improves skeletal muscle index, dysphagia, gait, balance, and handgrip strength, and may attenuate muscle loss in affected upper and lower extremities, when compared with rehabilitation alone (108474). The validity of these findings is limited by the short duration of treatment. Other research has compared BCAA dosing regimens. A small study in stroke patients taking part in exercise sessions shows that taking BCAAs 3.5 grams (Hepas, Clinico Co. Ltd) daily for 2 months with breakfast is more effective for improving leg strength and balance than when taken post-exercise in the mid-afternoon. However, there were no differences in most measures of strength or in skeletal muscle mass (103352). More evidence is needed to rate BCAAs for these uses.

(Read more about BRANCHED-CHAIN AMINO ACIDS (BCAA))

EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Oral calcium carbonate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an antacid. Details: Taking calcium carbonate orally as an antacid is effective for treating dyspepsia (1843). Calcium carbonate has FDA approval as an antacid.
• Hyperkalemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities. Details: Administering calcium gluconate intravenously can reverse electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias induced by hyperkalemia (12946). Intravenous calcium gluconate is FDA-approved for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities.
• Hypocalcemia. Oral calcium treats and prevents hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium is used to treat severe hypocalcemia. Details: Taking calcium orally is effective for treating and preventing hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate, acetate, gluceptate, or chloride is effective for severe hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany (12928).
• Kidney failure. Oral calcium carbonate or calcium acetate is used as a phosphate binder during kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium carbonate or calcium acetate orally is effective as a phosphate binder. Calcium acetate (PhosLo) appears to control hyperphosphatemia better than sevelamer (Renagel) (12943,12944,38990). Calcium citrate is not recommended for this purpose because it increases aluminum absorption and does not bind phosphate as efficiently as calcium acetate or calcium carbonate (21631). Some clinical research also shows that taking calcium orally reduces blood pressure in patients with kidney failure (975).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral calcium in combination with vitamin D prevents bone density loss that occurs during long-term treatment with corticosteroids. Details: Taking calcium in combination with vitamin D as adjunctive therapy seems to be effective for reducing bone mineral density loss in people using corticosteroids long-term (982,1046,1830,1831,1832,4462,4463,4464,4465,4466)(4467,12945,38493). One specific product used in clinical research is Oscal (Marion Merrel Dow Inc.), which contains elemental calcium 500 mg per tablet plus vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (982). Another product used is Oscal 250 + D (SmithKline Beecham Healthcare), which contains elemental calcium 250 mg and vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (1046).
• Hyperparathyroidism. Oral calcium reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium orally reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with kidney failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism (1827,1828,1829,39174,39425). In elderly women, the combination of calcium and vitamin D reverses secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces hip fracture risk (8818). Also, population research suggests increased calcium intake from the diet and supplements reduces the risk of primary hyperparathyroidism in women. Supplemental intakes of at least 500 mg/day and dietary intakes of approximately 1100 mg/day are considered to be protective (91353).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate calcium intake, from the diet and/or supplements, is recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate calcium intake in line with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) by age, along with adequate vitamin D intake, for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake when adequate dietary intake is not feasible (109425). In the US and Canada, foods containing at least 200 mg calcium with less phosphorous content than calcium can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate calcium intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (11940,102148). However, calcium supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Also, calcium supplements do not seem to be effective for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) during lactation (988), in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation (1817), or in patients who have had renal transplantation (4823,38736,38871). Maximal bone growth occurs in the teenage years, and then BMD in females remains relatively constant until age 30-40. After age 40, bone loss typically occurs at rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. In males, this occurs several decades later. Bone loss is more pronounced if dietary calcium intake is below the RDA, which is the case for many Americans (2571,2578). One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy children 7-14 years old shows that fortifying food with calcium 250-1000 mg daily for up to 24 months modestly improves femoral neck BMD, but not hip or spine BMD. However, the included trials did not supplement vitamin D (107232). During the 5 years immediately after menopause, calcium supplementation has very little effect on bone loss (2569,2570,2575,2576). The rapid loss of estrogen causes a high bone resorption rate, which increases serum calcium levels and therefore decreases intestinal absorption of calcium (2570). After this period, the typical rate of bone loss is 2% per year (2572,2576). Taking calcium 1000-1600 mg daily as carbonate, citrate, lactate gluconate, or citrate malate salt decreases this rate by 0.25% to 1% annually (977,979,981,2569,2571,2572,2575,2576,2578,6850)(38978,38980,39064). The greatest reductions (1% or more) are seen in the first 1-2 years of supplementation when bone remodeling foci can be filled (2569,2576). After this period, the differences in rate of loss between supplemented and non-supplemented females are closer to 0.25% per year (2569,2577). A meta-analysis of clinical evidence suggests that there is no additional benefit after 4 years (38980). Small clinical studies have found that continuous calcium supplementation at an average daily dose of 1050 mg, started after menopause and continued for 1.5-4 years, may reduce fracture rates by 26% when compared with no calcium supplementation. The largest of these studies was conducted in nursing home residents who also received daily vitamin D; the benefits of calcium, specifically, are unclear (39386). Some research also suggests that calcium and vitamin D improves primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in some older individuals with osteoporosis, particularly the elderly and those who are no longer community dwelling (12930,38875,38849,39026,109471). However, not all research is positive. One large clinical trial in elderly adults with a low-trauma fracture show that taking calcium 1000 mg daily with or without vitamin D 800 IU daily for 2-7 years does not reduce the risk of a second fracture when compared with placebo (13073). Another clinical study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 800 IU daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (less than 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). Also, some exploratory research suggests that supplements may need to be continued indefinitely; in adults over 68 years of age, any effects of 2 years of calcium supplements on BMD appear to be lost within 2 years after discontinuing supplements (6853). Calcium has additive effects when used with other agents such as vitamin D, estrogens, or calcitonin. Whereas calcium alone generally reduces or prevents loss of BMD, combination with other agents can produce small increases in BMD ranging from 0.3% to 3.3% depending on the combination and dosages used (978,980,1836,2570,2571,2572,2576). However, one meta-analysis in healthy adults shows that fortifying foods with calcium 250-1000 mg daily, in conjunction with vitamin D supplementation, for up to 24 months does not improve BMD when compared with control (107232). The full potential of osteoporosis treatments cannot be realized without adequate calcium intake (2569,2570,2571,2572). Advise patients taking agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene (Evista) to ensure that their daily calcium intake meets the RDA. Use supplements if necessary. The usefulness of calcium in preventing osteoporosis in males is not as well-studied. Some observational research has found that calcium 870 mg daily is not associated with changes in BMD and bone loss in males (97201). However, clinical evidence suggests that taking calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years might improve trabecular or cortical bone mass by 2% to 4% (980,8827,8873). Dietary supplementation with calcium and vitamin D seems to moderately reduce bone loss measured in the femoral neck, spine, and total body, and seems to reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in older patients with osteopenia or low BMD (980).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Adequate calcium intake seems to prevent symptoms of PMS. Details: There seems to be a link between low dietary calcium intake and symptoms of PMS (2004,6847,39007). Taking calcium 1000-1336 mg daily seems to significantly reduce depressed mood, water retention, and pain, especially if daily calcium intake is inadequate (1822,1823,1824,2004,95821). Calcium carbonate 1200 mg daily seems to decrease PMS symptom scores by about 18% when compared with placebo (1822). Increasing dietary calcium intake is also associated with a decreased risk of developing PMS. Consuming an average of 1283 mg of calcium per day from foods is associated with about a 30% lower risk of developing PMS compared with consuming an average of 529 mg daily (13094); however, taking calcium supplements does not appear to be associated with the risk of developing PMS.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Oral calcium seems to be beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer, especially in those with adequate vitamin D levels and normal body mass index (BMI). Details: Population studies have found that increased intake of dietary or supplemental calcium is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas (1047,8820,12120,38951,98898,98899). Clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research also show that taking calcium supplements 1.2-2 grams daily for up to 4 years can reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence by up to 29% (970,12118,12950,15267,34596,38718,39042,95817). However, not all research has been positive. Some meta-analyses of clinical research or observational studies suggest that taking calcium does not reduce the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer (34596,39042,39349). Other contradictory research suggests that postmenopausal females who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290); however, this finding may not be reliable due to the high baseline intake of calcium in study participants. The reason for these conflicting findings is not entirely clear. Vitamin D might be an important factor. People with lower than average vitamin D levels do not seem to get any benefit from calcium supplements (12118). Also, one meta-analysis of previous trials suggests that taking calcium 1200 mg daily reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas in people with a normal BMI, but not in those who are overweight or obese (99715). Despite this conflicting evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2005 stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence to support this claim (102366).
• Fetal bone mineralization. If calcium intakes are low during pregnancy, oral calcium seems to be beneficial for increasing fetal bone density. Details: With low dietary calcium intake (less than 562 mg elemental calcium daily) during pregnancy, calcium supplementation increases fetal bone mineralization and density. However, calcium supplementation does not offer any additional benefit if calcium intakes are adequate (3263,3264).
• Hypertension. Oral calcium seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount. However, it is unclear if this reduction is clinically significant. Details: Many clinical trials and observational studies show that intake of calcium supplements or dietary calcium modestly reduces blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension, usually around 1-2 mmHg. Calcium seems to be more effective for certain subpopulations of patients, such as salt-sensitive people and patients with low baseline dietary calcium intake (945,972,974,976,984,1818,1819,1820,1821,6852)(13138,14406,38803,39063,39094,39221). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium intake during pregnancy reduces systolic blood pressure in offspring by 1-2 mmHg (38852). However, a large-scale clinical trial in postmenopausal females shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg daily does not lower blood pressure or reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials shows that taking calcium in combination with vitamin D for up to 7 years has no effect on blood pressure (98861). The validity of this finding is limited by the poor methodological quality of the included studies. Some observational research suggests that calcium can reduce the risk for hypertension. Population research in females aged 45 years and older suggests that higher intake of calcium from both diet and supplement sources is linked to a lower risk of developing hypertension when compared to lower calcium intake (14265). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension. However, the FDA has concluded that this claim is based on supporting, rather than conclusive, evidence (102367).
• Osteomalacia. Oral calcium seems to reverse osteomalacia caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Osteomalacia is commonly caused by vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to osteomalacia in children and adults. Calcium supplementation can reverse osteomalacia caused by calcium deficiency. Along with appropriate vitamin D supplementation, individuals at risk of osteomalacia need sufficient calcium intake (94819).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral calcium seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia in high risk pregnancies, especially if calcium intakes are low. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (971,38756), most clinical research shows that taking calcium orally 1-2 grams daily reduces pregnancy-related hypertension and pre-eclampsia (973,1833,8828,39043,39319,39426,96480). Calcium appears to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia by about 50% when compared with placebo. One meta-analysis of 19 controlled trials involving over 29,000 pregnancies found that for every 19 females treated with calcium, one episode of pre-eclampsia would be avoided (96480). Calcium appears to have the greatest effect in individuals at high-risk of pre-eclampsia or with low calcium levels, and when taken at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation (15029,38497,96480,99714). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding the use of calcium supplements to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. However, due to the limited and conflicting research available at that time, the FDA stated that this outcome was highly unlikely. Since then, large, high-quality clinical research has supported this finding. In fact, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released a recommendation to prescribe oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancies at high risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary calcium intakes are low, in order to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).
• Rickets. Oral calcium seems to reverse rickets caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Rickets is commonly caused be vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to rickets. Calcium supplementation can reverse rickets caused by calcium deficiency (94819). A small clinical study in children with nutritional rickets shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily for 24 weeks improves radiographically measured rickets caused by calcium deficiency. Rickets seems to improve more rapidly with calcium 1000 mg compared to calcium 500 mg. However, increasing the calcium dose to 2000 mg daily is not more beneficial than calcium 1000 mg daily (98904).
• Tooth retention. Oral calcium with vitamin D seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral calcium does not seem to be beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Although some population research disagrees (15631,39041,95811,107237), most research shows that increased calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (15631,16715,98895,107236,107237). Subgroup analyses of population research suggest that calcium intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, adults (15631,107237). Another subgroup analysis in a large meta-analysis of population research also suggests that dietary intake may reduce estrogen receptor(ER)-negative breast cancer, but not ER-positive breast cancer (107236). However, most other research has not evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation or intake on breast cancer subtypes. The best evidence to date, from a large scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years after menopause does not reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer at the end of the study and 5 years after the end of the intervention (16715,98895).
• Fractures. Although oral calcium prevents fractures in osteoporosis, most evidence shows that calcium does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis discussion for more information on the use of calcium for this purpose. Details: The most recent and robust meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium supplementation with or without vitamin D is NOT associated with reduced fractures in older adults without osteoporosis (95822). A large-scale study in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years suggests calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D 400 IU daily for 7 years only modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) and does not significantly reduce fracture risk. This lack of effect may have been due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. In those who were 80% adherent, the combination of calcium plus vitamin D reduced the risk of hip fracture by about 29% (14282). Also, some clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 5 years does not attenuate loss of height after menopause when compared with placebo (95810). Additional meta-analyses of clinical and observational evidence suggest that calcium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, such as hip fractures (38589,38888,98895). Some other research has suggested that calcium in combination with vitamin D reduces fracture risk in older patients without osteoporosis (980,1836,8818,12930,12933,12952,38849,102145,107235); however, this research is confounded by a number of variables, including the presence of hormonal therapy and differing levels of fracture risk at baseline (1836,8818,95822). Conflicting findings on this topic might also be due to genetic differences in patient populations. A population analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study found that, in older females with the lowest genetic susceptibility to low bone mineral density (BMD), taking calcium with vitamin D is associated with a reduction in fracture risk. However, in females with a higher genetic susceptibility to low BMD, there is no association between supplementation and fracture risk. This might be because individuals with a lower susceptibility to low BMD are also more responsive to calcium and vitamin D supplementation (97357). As of April 2018, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with vitamin D >400 IU daily along with calcium >1000 mg daily is safe and effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture. USPSTF recommends against supplementing with calcium 1000 mg daily or less along with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal females (95695).
• Obesity. Oral calcium does not seem to improve weight loss. Details: Observational research has found that adults and children with low calcium intake are more likely to gain weight, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and be overweight or obese when compared to people with high calcium intake (12124,12125,12126,12127,14265). Additional observational research has found that increasing calcium intake is associated with weight loss in females; the results in males have been conflicting (12127,15602,15603). Despite these findings from observational research and a few small clinical studies (12128,15397,14438,98905), most clinical research has found that increased calcium intake does not increase weight loss (12052,13138,15396,15399,38985,39004,97356). The most recent meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies shows that daily dietary and supplemental calcium intake that meets the dietary reference intake (DRI) of 1000 mg or more daily does not increase weight loss in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when compared with intake below the DRI (95813). An older meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials also shows that increased dietary and supplemental calcium intake does not increase weight loss (15605).
• Overall mortality. Oral calcium does not seem to reduce overall mortality. Details: While some population research has found that calcium taken in combination with vitamin D in older females is associated with a lower risk of death (97353), most evidence shows that calcium, with or without vitamin D, has no effect on all-cause mortality (93533,97308).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral calcium does not reduce the risk of developing CVD and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Clinical research shows that calcium does not decrease CVD risk. Several separate meta-analyses of clinical and population research involving over 50,000 patients show that taking calcium 600-1200 mg daily for up to 7 years does not reduce the risk of CVD-related outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or overall mortality (39018,91350,92994,93533,97308,98902,107231,107233). No association was found between total dietary or supplemental calcium intake with or without vitamin D and the risk of CVD or mortality (91350,93533,97308). In fact, some population and clinical research has found that when calcium is used alone or with vitamin D, there is an INCREASED risk of CVD and coronary heart disease (38077,107233). However, other clinical research disagrees (93533). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease by 1.1-1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Intravenous calcium does not prevent nerve pain in patients given oxaliplatin. Oral calcium has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: While pooled analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials suggest that calcium and magnesium infusion decreases the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials shows that the infusion has no effect in preventing neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). Additionally, clinical trials show that administering calcium gluconate 1 gram with magnesium sulfate 1 gram intravenously immediately before, or before and after, the administration of a single oxaliplatin cycle (90005), or over the entire 6-cycle course of oxaliplatin, does not improve symptoms of neurotoxicity when compared with placebo (96474).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral calcium does not prevent MI. When taken in the absence of vitamin D, oral calcium may increase the risk of MI. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of calcium is associated with a decreased risk of MI (91350). However, a 2010 meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking calcium at a dose of at least 500 mg daily is associated with an approximate 30% INCREASE in the risk of MI in patients over the age of 40. According to this analysis, one additional case of MI will occur for every 69 patients that take calcium for 5 years (17482). A more recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of MI by 1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research studied postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233) In contrast, other meta-analyses of clinical research have shown that taking calcium for up to 7 years is NOT associated with an increased risk of MI, including a meta-analysis that only included postmenopausal females (93533,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI in postmenopausal females (93533). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for alcohol use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 800 mg and vitamin D 200 IU orally daily for 14 days modestly reduces alcohol craving scores and withdrawal scores when compared with placebo in adults with alcohol dependence that are undergoing withdrawal. Taking calcium carbonate did not reduce the need for diazepam; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (107234).
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for atherosclerosis. Details: A population study has found that taking calcium 1.2 grams daily for 3 years has no effect on carotid intima thickness or carotid atherosclerosis incidence. A total calcium intake (dietary and supplemental) of at least 1794 mg daily in older females may be associated with a decreased risk of carotid atherosclerosis when compared with a total calcium intake below 1010 mg daily (97351).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the odds of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. Details: A small observational study found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a 52% reduced odds of an autism spectrum disorder in the offspring (98900).
• Cancer. Oral calcium alone does not seem to prevent cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Taking calcium alone does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of cancer (12118,15629). The role of calcium in cancer prevention when taken along with vitamin D is controversial, as conflicting results exist. One clinical trial shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1400-1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1100 IU daily have a 60% lower relative risk for developing cancer of any type. Approximately 25 postmenopausal females would need to take this combination for 4 years to prevent one occurrence of cancer (15629). However, a more recent clinical study shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of cancer at 4 years (93943). Reasons for the disparate results are not entirely clear. The discrepancies do not appear to be related to baseline vitamin D levels or different study populations. It is possible that, given the 10-year time lapse between the two publications, the discrepancies result from differences in cancer detection capability. Also, since cancer risk was a secondary outcome measure in the earlier study and a primary outcome measure in the more recent study, it is possible that the discrepancies result from differences in statistical methodologies. The effect of vitamin D and calcium on cancer risk in males and younger patients is not known. There is also interest in using calcium for reducing the risk of hematological malignancies. An analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU for up to 10 years is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of hematologic malignancies when compared with placebo. However, no effect on hematologic malignancy related mortality was seen (97354).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between a higher dietary intake of calcium and the risk of depression when compared with a lower dietary intake of calcium (96480).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for type 2 diabetes prevention. Details: Some population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet or supplements, alone or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713,96473). However, population research is often limited by confounding variables. For example, one analysis found that any beneficial effect might be influenced by concomitant magnesium intake (96473). Furthermore, other population research has found that serum calcium levels higher than 9.6 mg/dL are associated with greater risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults with osteoporosis. This study is limited because it was not determined whether increased serum calcium was due to increased calcium intake or another factor such as parathyroid function (95815).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing pain associated with dysmenorrhea. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg with vitamin D 5000 IU daily for three menstrual cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (95821). However, calcium carbonate 1000 mg taken alone seems to reduce pain when compared with placebo.
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but dietary calcium does not seem to have any effect (38893).
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing falls. Details: Research suggests that calcium in combination with vitamin D, but not calcium alone, might prevent falls by decreasing body sway and normalizing systolic blood pressure (6362,11939,39038). Some experts think the combination of calcium and vitamin D may be important (11916). Preliminary clinical research in adults residing in a health care facility shows that taking vitamin D supplements while increasing dietary calcium and protein for 2 years reduces falls by 11% when compared with standard diets. Intervention diets were supplemented with milk, yogurt, and cheese to provide calcium 1142 mg and protein 69 grams daily (107235). There might also be different effects in females compared to males. In one study, females aged 65 years or older who took vitamin D 700 IU plus calcium citrate 500 mg daily over a 3-year period had a 46% lower risk of falling. However, this combination did not decrease falls in males (14291).
• Fluorosis. Oral calcium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking calcium orally, in combination with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and vitamin D, seems to be effective for reducing excessive fluoride levels in children and improving symptoms of fluorosis in children aged 6-12 years (990).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral calcium in combination with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing heart failure. Details: Based on a secondary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), taking calcium 1000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily does not reduce the risk of heart failure in the overall population or in individuals at high risk. However, in a subgroup of postmenopausal females without risk factors for heart failure, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of developing heart failure by about 37% (97307).
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for hypercholesterolemia. Details: Some evidence shows that taking calcium carbonate 400 mg three times daily reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4% and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 4% after 6 weeks of treatment when used in combination with a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) (2557). In contrast, a study in females with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 800 mg daily for 2 years might INCREASE total cholesterol levels by about 12 mg/dL when compared with placebo. This same study showed an association between calcium supplementation and an increase in total cholesterol levels and carotid intimal thickness in postmenopausal females, but not premenopausal females (97350). A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials which included both healthy patients and patients with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily and vitamin D 200-7142 IU daily modestly improves HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplementation is more effective in patients with dyslipidemia at baseline. It is unclear if this effect is due to calcium, vitamin D, or the combination (107227). However, other research shows that taking a specific supplement containing calcium 600 mg plus vitamin D 200 IU (Caltrate 600 D, Wyeth Consumer Healthcare Inc.) twice daily in combination with calorie restriction does not reduce total or LDL cholesterol levels when compared with placebo (15601).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing blood levels of lead. Details: Lead is mobilized along with calcium from bone during pregnancy and lactation, resulting in increased serum concentrations of lead. One clinical study suggests that calcium supplementation does not significantly decrease these elevated lead concentrations (1586). However, another clinical study suggests that taking calcium reduces blood lead levels by 11% when compared with placebo, with greatest effects observed in those with high baseline levels of lead (38957).
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral calcium for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of calcium for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium alone or with vitamin D is beneficial for metabolic syndrome prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet and supplements alone, or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713).
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing nephrotic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium 500-1000 mg daily for 3 months in combination with vitamin D3 60,000 IU daily or weekly for 4 weeks has no effect on bone mineral density or the risk of relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (97355).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking calcium alone or with vitamin D3 1000 IU daily reduced the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but had no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma (104622).
• Oral mucositis. When used in combination with fluoride treatments, a calcium phosphate mouth rinse seems to prevent and reduce mucositis-related pain in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that using a particular mouth rinse (Caphosol, EUSA Pharma) containing calcium phosphate, in combination with fluoride treatments, reduces days of mucositis, the duration of pain, and the dose and days of morphine used when compared with placebo and fluoride treatment (38611).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: An older meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (38792). However, a more recent pooled analysis of 15 cohort and case-control studies has found that the highest intake of dietary or dairy calcium is associated with a 20% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared to the lowest intake (97349).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing postpartum depression risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium 2 grams daily beginning at 11-21 weeks gestation reduces depression at 12 weeks postpartum when compared with placebo. However, no benefit is seen at 6 weeks postpartum (39447).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing leg cramps during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking calcium 1 gram twice daily (as a mixture of salts) for 2 weeks can reduce pregnancy-related leg cramps during the second half of pregnancy when compared with no treatment (2567).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily might decrease the risk of developing prostate cancer (14133). However, some epidemiological research suggests that consuming very high doses of calcium, over 2000 mg daily, might actually increase the risk of developing prostate cancer (14134). Some epidemiological research also suggests that doses greater than 1500 mg daily increase the risk of poorly differentiated, clinically advanced, and fatal prostate cancer (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer (98894). However, contradictory research suggests that there is no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall risk of prostate cancer (14131,14132,104630).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Some population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke (4822,38678). However, other population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is not associated with a decreased risk of stroke (91350). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years does not affect the risk of stroke when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females, and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Vertigo. Oral calcium with vitamin D might reduce positional vertigo; the effect of calcium when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking calcium 500 mg and vitamin D 400 IU twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate calcium for these uses.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

EFFECTIVE

• Sickle cell disease. A specific oral glutamine powder (Endari, Emmaus Medical, Inc) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to reduce acute complications of sickle cell disease. Details: Clinical research in adults and children 5 years of age and older shows that taking glutamine 5-15 grams (0.3 grams/kg body weight) orally twice daily for 48 weeks, either with or without hydroxyurea, delays the median time to first crisis by 30 days, and reduces the incidence of acute chest syndrome by 15%, number of hospitalizations by 33%, and the number of hospitalized days by 40%, when compared with placebo (96519,99414).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Burns. Oral glutamine seems to improve healing in patients with severe burns and may also reduce the risk for burn wound infections; however, it is unclear if glutamine improves hospitalization length or mortality. Details: Some clinical research shows that administering enteral nutrition supplemented with glutamine 0.35-0.5 grams/kg daily for 12-14 days, beginning within 24-48 hours of hospitalization for severe burn injury (excluding inhalation injury), decreases the length of hospital stay by 6-9 days and may shorten wound healing when compared to control enteral nutrition (52307,52337). A clinical study in adults with moderate to severe burns (including inhalation injury) shows that administering enteral nutrition supplemented with intravenous alanyl glutamine 0.5 grams/kg daily, beginning within 24 hours of burn injury and continued for 14 days, may improve burn-induced organ damage, particularly intestinal mucosal injury, but does not improve mortality or length of hospitalization, when compared with standard nutritional support (108027). Another study in the same population shows that administering enteral nutrition supplemented with glutamine 4.3 grams every 4 hours, beginning within 24 hours of burn injury, decreases the risk of mortality by 83% and the risk of Pseudomonas wound infections; however, it does not decrease the duration of hospitalization (52311). A meta-analysis of these trials and one additional trial shows that administering glutamine enterally reduces the risk of Gram-negative bacterial wound infections by 73% and reduces the risk of mortality by 87% when compared to a control group. However, there was no difference in length of stay or overall wound infection rate (97363). Results were based on a small number of patients within each outcome evaluation. Intravenous glutamine has also been evaluated. One small clinical study shows that intravenous glutamine 0.57 grams/kg daily decreases the incidence of Gram-negative bacteremia by 35% when compared with control in patients with severe burns. However, it does not appear to decrease the incidence of Gram-positive bacteremia, the need to use antibiotics, or risk of mortality (52272).
• Critical illness (trauma). Oral and intravenous glutamine seem to reduce infectious complications in critically ill adults. However, glutamine does not seem to reduce mortality in this population. Details: Some studies show that glutamine reduces the risk of infectious complications in critically ill, multiple-trauma, or postoperative adult patients (5449,5450,7309,7731,8184,52288,52359). However, other studies show no benefit (52308,52360,97362). Meta-analyses of these and other clinical trials suggest that glutamine supplementation reduces the risk of nosocomial infections in critically ill patients by 15% to 18% and the risk of nosocomial infections in surgical patients by 30% to 41%. This benefit was seen only with parenteral glutamine; enteral glutamine does not appear to reduce the risk for nosocomial infection (91355,91358). The role of glutamine for reducing mortality in critically ill adults is conflicting. Some clinical trials suggest that glutamine-enriched enteral and parenteral nutrition reduces mortality in critically ill patients (52283,52289,52408). However, other studies show no benefit (52288,52308,52354,52359,97362). Meta-analyses of results from these and other clinical trials show that, overall, taking glutamine does not reduce the risk of mortality in critically ill patients (91355,91358). However, the dose and dosage form may affect outcomes. One meta-analysis shows that glutamine does not affect the risk of mortality when administered at doses up to 0.5 grams/kg daily, although doses greater than 0.5 grams/kg daily may INCREASE mortality by 18% (91355). Another meta-analysis shows that glutamine decreases short-term mortality in critically ill patients by 25% when administered parenterally, but not enterally (91358). Neither parenteral nor enteral glutamine appears to decrease the risk of long-term mortality in critically ill patients (91358). Research evaluating glutamine in critically ill children is limited. One clinical study in children ages 1-17 admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) shows that enteral administration of glutamine along with zinc, selenium, and intravenous metoclopramide does not reduce nosocomial infections when compared with whey supplementation (86095).
• HIV/AIDS-related wasting. Oral glutamine seems to attenuate weight loss related to HIV/AIDS. Details: Very small clinical studies show that taking glutamine orally seems to enhance intestinal absorption of nutrients, decrease intestinal permeability, and increase weight gain in adults with HIV/AIDS when compared with placebo. Doses of 40 grams daily seem to produce the greatest effect (2337,2702). Lower doses of 14 grams daily might also be effective when used in combination with arginine and hydroxymethylbutyrate (a leucine metabolite) (7310).
• Postoperative recovery. Oral or intravenous glutamine seems to reduce the duration of hospitalization and improve postoperative nutritional status in adults. However, it does not seem to reduce postoperative mortality. Details: Although some conflicting evidence exists (52316), most clinical research shows that receiving free glutamine or glutamine-containing dipeptide intravenously decreases the duration of hospitalization after surgery, particularly after major abdominal surgery (2363,5448,7300,7732,52275,52341). A meta-analysis of this research and other studies shows that IV supplementation with glutamine-containing dipeptides reduces the length of hospital stay by 3 days when compared with no supplementation (96507). Other meta-analyses of clinical research also show that glutamine supplementation, as free glutamine or glutamine-containing dipeptides, reduces the risk of hospital-acquired infections by 30% in surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients and by 41% in elective surgical patients (91355,91358). In cancer patients undergoing abdominal surgery, glutamine-supplemented parenteral nutrition seems to improve nutritional status and gastrointestinal function (100943). Glutamine-containing dipeptides also appear to help to preserve intestinal integrity (7299,7300,7732,52306). One small study has evaluated oral glutamine 10 grams, in combination with arginine 4.5 grams, in patients undergoing surgery for enterocutaneous fistulas. This study shows that taking this combination daily for 7 days prior to surgery reduces recurrence of fistulas by 35%, and also reduces postoperative infections (103837). Although glutamine seems to decrease length of stay and reduce infection rate, it does not appear to reduce the risk of mortality in either surgical ICU or elective surgical patients (91355,91358,96509,103834), including those receiving major abdominal surgery (5448,52316,91355,96507). Additionally, most research shows that glutamine supplementation does not reduce the incidence of infectious complications following abdominal surgery (52306,52316,52341,5448,7300,96507). The effects of glutamine on reducing infection rate might be related to patient population, modes of nutrition, or dose of glutamine. Taking a combination of glutamine 7 grams, arginine 7 grams, and hydroxymethylbutyrate 1.2 grams (Abound, Abbott) orally daily for 3 days before and 7 days after abdominal surgery does not reduce the incidence of wound infections or other complications (99413). Most of the research evaluating glutamine in surgical patients has been conducted in adults. Information in children is limited. Existing clinical research shows that glutamine-fortified parenteral nutrition does not improve intestinal permeability, nitrogen balance, duration of hospitalization, incidence of infectious complications, or risk of mortality in newborns and infants undergoing digestive-tract surgery (52338,96508).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral glutamine does not seem to improve athletic performance. Details: Small studies in trained athletes or healthy adults show that taking glutamine orally does not seem to enhance performance or immune response during intense acute or prolonged exercise when compared with placebo (2341,2342,5455,5456).
• Crohn disease. Oral glutamine does not seem to improve symptoms of this condition. Details: Small clinical studies in adults and children with Crohn disease show that taking glutamine 7 grams three times daily or following a glutamine-enriched diet for 4 weeks does not seem to improve intestinal permeability or disease activity, and might even worsen disease activity, when compared with placebo or a low-glutamine diet (2338,6256).
• Cystinuria. Oral glutamine does not seem to improve cystinuria. Details: According to case reports, taking glutamine orally does not seem to reduce the excretion of cysteine in the urine in patients with homozygous cystinuria (2339).
• Low birth weight. Oral glutamine does not seem to reduce adverse consequences of low birth weight in infants. Details: Most clinical studies show that glutamine supplementation does not improve the time to full enteral feeding, infant growth rate, or length of hospital stay in low birth weight infants (52305,52312,52325,52342,52362,52410). One follow-up study also shows that neonatal glutamine supplementation is not associated with improvements in cognitive function, motor skills, or behavior outcomes by school age when corrected for neonatal infection rate (52342,97365).
• Muscular dystrophy. Oral glutamine does not seem to improve symptoms of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Details: Clinical studies show that taking glutamine 0.5-0.6 grams/kg orally does not significantly improve muscle strength or whole body protein degradation in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy when compared with placebo or a nonspecific amino acid mixture (46657,52363).
• Prematurity. Oral glutamine does not seem to reduce morbidity or mortality associated with prematurity. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical trials in preterm infants, including infants with low to very low birth weight, shows that use of enteral or parenteral glutamine does not reduce the risk of mortality or morbidities, such as necrotizing enterocolitis, when compared with control. However, limited evidence from a sub-group analysis suggests that enteral glutamine might modestly reduce the risk of invasive infection when compared with control (105015). These findings are limited by the selection bias and heterogeneity of the included trials.
• Radiation-induced diarrhea. Oral glutamine does not seem to improve diarrhea due to radiation therapy. Details: One meta-analysis of five randomized, controlled trials shows that taking oral glutamine during radiotherapy for pelvic cancers does not prevent or reduce the severity of diarrhea when compared with placebo (97367).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Antiretroviral-associated diarrhea. It is unclear if oral glutamine improves diarrhea caused by antiretroviral agents. Details: A small crossover clinical study in HIV patients shows that oral glutamine 30 grams daily for 10 days seems to reduce the severity of nelfinavir-associated diarrhea when compared with placebo (52313).
• Alcohol use disorder. Although there is interest in using oral glutamine for alcohol use disorder, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of glutamine for this condition.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although there is interest in using oral glutamine for ADHD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of glutamine for this condition.
• Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. It is unclear if oral glutamine improves diarrhea caused by chemotherapy. Details: Although preliminary clinical studies show that glutamine might reduce the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (7235,7285), a meta-analysis of this research and others shows no difference in the severity of diarrhea (7233,7295,96516). Despite results showing a significant 1-day reduction in the duration of diarrhea, this might not be considered clinically significant (96516).
• Chemotherapy-induced lymphocytopenia. It is unclear if oral glutamine reduces lymphocytopenia caused by chemotherapy. Details: One small clinical study in patients with esophageal cancer receiving chemo-radiotherapy shows that taking glutamine 30 grams daily for 28 days seems to prevent a reduction in lymphocytes when compared with placebo (2705). However, another small clinical trial in patients with leukemia or lymphoma receiving intensive chemotherapy shows that adding glutamine 26 grams to total parenteral nutrition (TPN), in place of other amino acids, does not affect duration of neutropenia when compared with receiving an isonitrogenous standard TPN (7295).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral glutamine is beneficial in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. Details: A very small, nonblinded, non-randomized evaluation of otherwise healthy patients over 50 years of age who were hospitalized with mild COVID-19 pneumonia shows that taking glutamine 10 grams three times daily orally with meals is associated with a 1-day decrease in hospital stay (from 10 days to 9) when compared with patients not taking glutamine. In the latter group, 4 patients required transfer to the ICU, compared with no patients in the glutamine group (103839). A similar, non-randomized evaluation of adults hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia shows that adding the same dose of glutamine to other therapies for 5 days is associated with a 3-day decrease in hospital stay (from 14 days to 11) when compared with patients not taking glutamine. At the end of treatment, 0% of patients in the glutamine group required ICU services, compared with 54% of patients who did not receive glutamine. This study also shows that taking glutamine may increase appetite (108035). The validity of these findings is limited by short duration of treatment and use of non-standardized treatments.
• Cystic fibrosis. It is unclear if oral glutamine improves growth and development in children with cystic fibrosis. Details: A small clinical study in undernourished or stunted children with cystic fibrosis shows that taking glutamine 0.7 grams/kg daily orally for 4 weeks with or without recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) does not promote protein gain when compared with rhGH alone (52321).
• Diabetic foot ulcers. Oral glutamine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific nutritional supplement drink containing glutamine 7 grams, arginine 7 grams, and hydroxymethylbutyrate 1.5 grams (Abound, Abbott) twice daily for 16 weeks does not improve total wound closure or reduce the time to complete healing when compared with a control drink in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (96637). It is unclear if this effect is due to glutamine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Diarrhea. It is unclear if oral glutamine improves diarrhea in children and infants. Details: One preliminary clinical study in 6-24 month-old otherwise healthy children with acute diarrhea shows that taking capsules prepared with a specific glutamine powder (Power Glutamine, Champion Nutrition) 0.3 grams/kg daily for 7 days reduces the duration of diarrhea by about one day when compared with placebo (52323). However, other clinical research in male infants 1-12 months old with acute diarrhea and dehydration shows that adding glutamine 90 mmol/L along with the standard World Health Organization oral rehydration salts (ORS) does not decrease the duration of diarrhea, stool output, or the volume of oral rehydration solution required to achieve and maintain hydration when compared with standard ORS alone (7298).
• Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). It is unclear whether oral glutamine or glutamine added to parenteral nutrition improves morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing HSCT. Some research has suggested that intravenous glutamine may actually worsen outcomes. Details: Some research suggests that patients receiving glutamine-supplemented parenteral nutrition (PN) after HSCT primarily to treat hematologic malignancies have a diminished incidence of clinical infections, lower rates of microbial colonization, and decreased length of hospital stay when compared to control (2366,52381). However, not all patients seem to benefit. Some research shows that oral glutamine or PN with glutamine does not reduce the risk of mortality or infections in patients with hematologic malignancies and/or solid tumors (5451,52385). Also, a small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that PN with glutamine dipeptide may increase the duration of hospital stay (52292). Furthermore, one small study has found that receiving PN with glutamine was associated with lower disease-free survival and event-free survival over 3 years when compared with standard PN in patients receiving HSCT for hematologic malignancies (52355).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). There is limited evidence on the oral use of glutamine in patients with IBS. Details: A clinical trial in adults with IBS (diarrhea-predominant, constipation-predominant, mixed, or alternating bowel habits) shows that following a low FODMAP diet supplemented with oral glutamine 15 grams three times daily for 6 weeks improves IBS-Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) scores, with 88% of patients in the glutamine group reporting a 45% improvement in severity scores, compared with 60% of patients following the low FODMAP diet alone (108037). The validity of this finding is limited by short duration of treatment and lack of follow-up. Preliminary clinical research in patients with postinfectious, diarrhea-predominant IBS shows that taking glutamine 5 grams three times daily for 8 weeks leads to a nearly 14-fold greater likelihood of symptom improvement, defined as a reduction of 50 points or more on the IBS-SSS, and decreases stool frequency by 2.45 stools daily when compared with placebo. Taking glutamine also seems to reduce abdominal pain ratings by 55% and improve quality of life scores by 53% when compared to baseline in these patients (100944). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral glutamine improves survival in patients with advanced lung cancer. Details: One small clinical study in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer shows that taking glutamine 10 grams three times daily for 12 months along with palliative chemoradiotherapy prevents weight loss, which is an important predictor of survival, but does not increase the likelihood of progression-free survival when compared with palliative chemoradiotherapy alone (100942). It is unclear if this study was adequately powered to detect a difference in survival between groups.
• Malnutrition. It is unclear if oral alanyl-glutamine improves height and weight in children at risk for malnutrition. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children aged 2 months to 5 years from a low-income area of Brazil and at risk for malnutrition, shows that taking 3-12 grams of alanyl-glutamine orally daily for 10 days improves gut integrity and is associated with a modest, short-term increase in weight when compared with a glycine placebo (103838).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral glutamine is beneficial for exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A very small clinical crossover trial in professional athletes undergoing rigorous training shows that taking oral glutamine 6 grams daily for 20 days reduces serum levels of creatine kinase and myoglobin when compared with placebo (108031). The validity of these findings is limited due to the small size and short duration of treatment.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral glutamine is beneficial for weight loss. Details: A preliminary clinical study in 36 overweight or obese adults shows that taking glutamine 30 grams daily for 2 weeks reduces waist circumference by 1.8 cm, but does not improve body weight, body mass index, or glycemic indices, when compared to baseline. None of these outcomes were improved over baseline in an alanine control group (100941). Given the small study size and short duration of therapy, the long-term effects of glutamine on anthropometric measures is unclear.
• Opioid withdrawal. Oral glutamine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in Chinese patients undergoing detoxification from heroin shows that taking a combination of tyrosine, lecithin, 5-HTP, and glutamine 50 mg/kg orally daily for 6 days might reduce mood-related withdrawal symptoms when compared with placebo (88178). It is unclear if this effect is due to glutamine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Oral mucositis. There is contradictory evidence about the effects of glutamine in patients with, or at risk of developing, oral mucositis from chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Details: Small clinical studies suggest that taking glutamine orally or swishing and swallowing a glutamine solution can decrease the incidence, severity, and duration of oral mucositis in some patients undergoing chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy for cancer or hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (2336,2368,2704,5029). Additionally, three meta-analyses of highly heterogeneous clinical trials in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy suggests that glutamine reduces the incidence of severe (grade ≥3) oral mucositis when compared with control (105014,108028,108036). These analyses are limited for several reasons, including reporting bias, lack of sensitivity analysis, and population heterogeneity. Some small clinical studies included in these meta-analyses suggest that supplementation with glutamine may reduce the need for feeding tubes and opioid analgesics (108028,108036). However, not all research has been positive. Some small clinical studies in patients receiving chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil for cancer or HSCT suggest that oral or intravenous glutamine does not reduce the incidence of oral mucositis when compared with control (2365,5451,5462,7296,52349,52350). Furthermore, a meta-analysis of 5 clinical trials in patients with head or neck cancers shows that oral glutamine does not reduce the overall incidence or the incidence of moderate to severe radiation-induced oral mucositis when compared with control (103836). The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and the International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) cautiously recommends the use of oral glutamine to prevent oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy. However, due to some evidence suggesting that intravenous glutamine may actually worsen outcomes in HSCT patients, the MASCC/ISOO recommends against its use for the prevention of oral mucositis in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy, with or without total body irradiation, for HSCT (105004).
• Paclitaxel-induced myalgia and arthralgia. It is unclear if oral glutamine reduces the risk for myalgias and arthralgias due to paclitaxel. Details: One small clinical study shows that taking glutamine 10 grams three times daily for 5 days, starting on the day of chemotherapy and repeated over 2 cycles of chemotherapy, does not reduce the rate or severity of paclitaxel-induced myalgias or arthralgias when compared with placebo (52331).
• Pancreatitis. It is unclear if oral glutamine improves outcomes in patients with acute pancreatitis. Details: Two meta-analyses of the available clinical research in patients with pancreatitis show that enteral or parenteral supplementation with glutamine increases albumin, decreases C-reactive protein, and might reduce mortality, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, hospital length of stay, and infections. Results are difficult to interpret due to the significant heterogeneity of the included trials and limited generalizability of the results (96513,103835).
• Peptic ulcers. Although there is interest in using oral glutamine for peptic ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of glutamine for this condition.
• Postoperative infection. It is unclear if oral or intravenous glutamine is beneficial for the prevention of postoperative infection in patients with colorectal cancer who are recovering from surgery. Details: A meta-analysis of nonblinded clinical research in adults with colorectal or colon cancer who recently underwent radical surgery shows that daily supplementation with glutamine 0.3-1 grams/kg, administered either orally or parenterally, improves the rate of surgical site infections and anastomotic leakage when compared with control (108033). These findings are limited by the high heterogeneity of the included studies and unclear reporting.
• Postoperative recovery. It is unclear if oral or intravenous glutamine is beneficial in patients with colorectal cancer who are recovering from surgery. Details: A meta-analysis of nonblinded clinical research in adults with colorectal or colon cancer who recently underwent radical surgery shows that taking either oral or parenteral glutamine 0.3-1 grams/kg daily may reduce the length of hospital stay when compared with control (108033). These findings are limited by the high heterogeneity of the included studies and unclear reporting.
• Pressure ulcers. Oral glutamine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with stages II-IV pressure ulcers shows that taking a specific nutritional supplement drink containing glutamine 7 grams, arginine 7 grams, and hydroxymethylbutyrate 1.5 grams per packet (Abound, Abbott Nutrition) as two packets twice daily by mouth for 2 weeks has no effect on wound area or healing scores by the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) measurement when compared with standard nutritional care (96506).
• Radiation dermatitis. It is unclear if oral glutamine reduces the risk of developing dermatitis from radiation therapy. Details: One small clinical study in patients with head and neck cancers receiving cisplatin shows that taking a specific supplement containing glutamine 7 grams, arginine 7 grams, and hydroxymethylbutyrate 1.5 grams (Abound, Abbott) orally twice daily, starting on day 1 of radiation and continuing until 1 week after radiation therapy, does not reduce the incidence of severe radiation-induced dermatitis when compared with no supplementation (96639). However, another small clinical study in patients with breast cancer who have had both chemotherapy and surgery shows that taking oral glutamine 5 grams three times daily, starting 1 week before radiation and continuing until 1 week after radiation, is associated with a reduction in grade 1 and grade 2 radiation dermatitis when compared with placebo (97366).
• Radiation-induced esophagitis. It is unclear if oral glutamine reduces the risk of developing esophagitis from radiation therapy. Details: A small clinical study in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer shows that taking glutamine 10 grams three times daily for 12 months along with a palliative dose of chemoradiotherapy (total 30 Gy) results in a 7% incidence of symptomatic (grade 2 or higher) radiation-induced esophagitis, compared with a 53% incidence with palliative chemoradiotherapy alone. The glutamine group also had a 5.8-day delay in the onset of esophagitis (100942). However, a lower dose of glutamine in patients receiving higher doses of radiotherapy might not be beneficial. A small clinical study in patients with advanced thoracic malignancies shows that taking glutamine 4 grams mixed in water twice daily for 4 weeks along with radiotherapy (total dose of at least 45 Gy) to the esophagus, with or without chemotherapy, does not slow the onset of radiation-induced esophagitis or reduce its severity when compared with a glycine placebo (105011).
• Short bowel syndrome. It is unclear if oral glutamine improves symptoms of short bowel syndrome. Details: Although small clinical studies suggest that glutamine plus growth hormone can decrease dependence on parenteral nutrition in some patients (2334,2361,2362,2703), it has not shown benefit for improving intestinal absorption of energy in all studies (8185). Additionally, glutamine alone doesn't appear to be beneficial (7730).
• Traumatic Brain injury (TBI). It is unclear if intravenous glutamine is beneficial in patients hospitalized with severe TBI. Details: A clinical trial in patients hospitalized for a severe TBI shows that adherence to a hypocaloric, low-protein diet supplemented with daily intravenous glutamine 0.3 g/kg for 7 days does not improve 28-day mortality when compared with standard nutritional support alone. However, it may reduce the length of ventilator use, hospitalization, and duration of intensive care unit stay (108034).
• Vincristine-induced neuropathy. It is unclear if oral glutamine reduces the risk of developing neuropathy from treatment with vincristine in children. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children ages 1-21 years receiving vincristine for various cancer types shows that taking glutamine 6 grams/m2 twice daily orally for 21 days reduces sensory neuropathy when compared with placebo. There was a significant improvement in self-reported, but not parent-reported, quality of life scores as measured by the PedsQL scale. However, there was no effect on motor neuropathy with the use of glutamine (96517).
• Wound healing. It is unclear if oral glutamine improves wound healing. Details: Preliminary clinical research in trauma patients with wound healing disorders shows that taking glutamine 20 grams orally daily in combination with ascorbic acid 500 mg, vitamin E 166 mg, beta-carotene 3.2 mg, selenium 100 mcg, and zinc 6.6 mg (Glutamine Plus, Fresenius Kabi) for 14 days reduces the time to wound closure by 29 days when compared with placebo. However, there is no difference in length of stay (97364). More evidence is needed to rate glutamine for these uses.

(Read more about GLUTAMINE)

EFFECTIVE

• Lactose intolerance. Lactase is effective for reducing gastrointestinal symptoms from consuming lactose in lactose intolerant individuals. Details: Multiple clinical trials show that taking lactase orally is effective for reducing GI symptoms in lactose-intolerant people when used before the consumption of lactose or when added to milk prior to consumption (2371,2372,2373,106669).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Colic. It is unclear if oral lactase is beneficial in infants with colic. Details: Preliminary clinical research in infants with colic shows that supplementing human milk or formula with lactase (Crosscare Ltd) for 10 days reduces breath hydrogen levels, but not time spent crying, when compared with placebo. However, approximately 30% of infants in this study were considered to be noncompliant. When only infants considered to be compliant were included in the analysis, time spent crying during the 10-day treatment period was reduced by about 6 hours in the lactase group when compared with placebo (96347). In two other small trials, giving 5 drops of a specific lactase formulation (Colibid, RG Pharmaceutica or Yamoo, Walter Bushnell) to infants aged 0-6 months with colic before each feed, or 4 times a day, for 2-4 weeks significantly reduces crying time and fussing time when compared with placebo (104107,112190). However, measures of crying time were based on subjective parent recall only.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if oral lactase is beneficial in premature patients. Details: Clinical research shows that giving fortified human milk or preterm formula treated with lactase drops (Lactaid, McNeil Consumer Products Company) to preterm infants does not improve weight gain, feeding tolerance, weekly length gain, or gain in head circumference by 36 weeks' gestational age or discharge from the hospital (whichever comes first) when compared with giving untreated milk or formula (96346). More evidence is needed to rate lactase for these uses.

(Read more about LACTASE)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Angina. Oral L-arginine seems to improve symptoms and exercise tolerance in patients with angina. Details: Clinical research shows that taking L-arginine orally seems to decrease symptoms and improve exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with mild to severe angina (3593,7815,7816,31866,31923). Some patients with severe angina who have frequent attacks at rest despite treatment with standard antianginal agents might also benefit from L-arginine (3593). However, L-arginine does not seem to improve objective measures of blood vessel dilation or increase circulating concentrations of nitric oxide (7817,99262). Also, when used in combination with ten 200 mcg injections of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-165 plasmid DNA, L-arginine 6 grams daily orally for 3 months does not improve angina severity in patients with coronary artery disease who underwent surgical angiogenesis compared to patients who did not receive this combination (32001). In addition, intravenous infusion of arginine 10% solution does not improve exercise capacity in patients with stable angina when compared with placebo (31843,32293).
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). Oral L-arginine might improve symptoms of ED. When taken with phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, L-arginine seems to provide a small additional benefit. Details: Taking L-arginine orally in high doses, 5 grams daily, improves subjective assessment of sexual function in males with organic ED when compared with placebo (222,102586). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 4 small clinical studies in patients with ED, including those with diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease risk factors, shows that although PDE5 inhibitors improve sexual function better than L-arginine, the combination of PDE5 inhibitors and L-arginine may be more effective than either treatment alone (105065). In most clinical trials, doses of L-arginine 2.5-5 mg daily for 6-12 weeks were used alone or in addition to PDE5 inhibitors such as sildenafil 50 mg or tadalafil 5-10 mg daily (102586,102587,102592,104222). Higher doses have also been investigated. One clinical trial shows that taking L-arginine (Bioarginina, Farmaceutici Damor S.p.A., Napoli, Italy), 2 grams three times daily for 3 months improves sexual function compared with placebo (110387). However, taking lower doses, 1.5 grams daily, might not be effective in patients with mixed-type ED (2038). L-arginine has also been examined in combination with other ingredients. A meta-analysis of 2 small clinical studies in males with mild-to-moderate ED shows that taking L- arginine, up to 3 grams daily, in combination with maritime pine for 1-6 months improves a subjective assessment of sexual function when compared with control (112715). Some preliminary clinical evidence suggests that taking L-arginine orally in low doses, 1.7 grams daily in combination with maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol) or taking 0.69 grams daily along with maritime pine bark extract and aspartic acid (Edicare, Kobayashi Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.) modestly improves symptoms of ED (10416,50924). Another preliminary clinical trial has investigated the effects of a combination of L-arginine 2.5 grams daily for 6 months and tadalafil 5 mg daily for 3 months, both starting with the initiation of weekly extracorporeal shock wave (ESW) therapy. When compared with ESW alone, this combination modestly improves sexual function for up to 12 months (110388). The effect of L-arginine alone is not clear from these studies.
• Hypertension. Oral L-arginine can modestly reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Details: Oral L-arginine seems to have additive vasodilating effects when used with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or nitrate vasodilators such as isosorbide mononitrate (7822,20192,31916). A meta-analysis of clinical research in a variety of populations shows that taking L-arginine reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP; DPB) by an average of 6.40 mmHg and 2.64 mmHg, respectively. Sub-analyses show that these reductions occur in both normotensive and hypertensive individuals. Beneficial effects were limited to adults with a body mass index (BMI) of 18.5 to 19.9 kg/m² (110384). The effect of L-arginine on blood pressure levels in adults exposed to traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) has also been investigated. Clinical research in adults with hypertension shows that taking L-arginine 3 grams three times daily for 2 weeks modestly reduces SBP and DBP elevations following a 2-hour exposure to TRAP during an outdoor walk compared with taking placebo (110383). Doses have included 4-24 grams daily, with the best evidence of benefit for doses of less than 9 grams daily, for 2-24 weeks (7818,10636,31871,31923,32167,32201,110383,110384).
• Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Oral L-arginine may help prevent NEC in premature infants. Details: In a meta-analysis of 3 clinical trials, L-arginine 260 mg/kg orally in a single dose or two divided doses daily reduces the absolute risk of NEC in premature infants by about 62% when compared with placebo. To prevent one case of NEC, 6 infants would need to be treated with L-arginine (8474,91194,96803).
• Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Short-term use of intravenous or oral L-arginine may improve symptoms of PAD, but long-term use does not seem to be beneficial. Details: Clinical research shows that using L-arginine intravenously or orally for up to 8 weeks increases flow-mediated dilation and improves symptoms of intermittent claudication associated with PAD (3465,31857,31905). However, long-term administration of L-arginine orally for up to 6 months does not improve walking speed, walking distance, or absolute claudication distance in patients with PAD and intermittent claudication (31957,31985).
• Pre-eclampsia. Intravenous L-arginine may have beneficial effects in pre-eclampsia. However, it is unclear if oral L-arginine is effective. Details: One small clinical study shows that intravenous L-arginine 30 grams as a one-time dose decreases systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 5 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by 11 mmHg when compared to baseline in pregnant patients with hypertension or pre-eclampsia (31847), while intravenous L-arginine 20 grams daily for 5 days decreases SBP and DBP by about 2% when compared with placebo (31978). Another small clinical study shows that oral use of L-arginine 3 grams daily for 3 weeks reduces SBP and DBP by around 7 and 5 mmHg, respectively, when compared with placebo (31938); however, taking L-arginine 12 grams daily by mouth for 5 days does not seem to improve blood pressure in these patients (11828). Another preliminary clinical trial allowing for both oral and intravenous dosing shows that taking L-arginine 3.5 grams by mouth every 6 hours or 10 grams via intravenous infusion every 8 hours shortly before or immediately after delivery and continuing until postpartum day 3 does not improve blood pressure when compared with placebo (31959). The reasons for the disparate findings are unclear, but the small study sizes, as well as variations in the dose, duration, and timing of therapy before and/or after delivery, may explain some of the differences. Oral L-arginine has also been evaluated for the prevention of pre-eclampsia. One clinical study in patients at high risk for pre-eclampsia shows that taking L-arginine 3 grams daily starting the 20th week of gestation reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia by about 74% when compared with placebo (96811). Based on these results, one case of pre-eclampsia is prevented for every 6 high-risk pregnant patients treated with L-arginine 3 grams daily. Another clinical study also shows that taking two bars of a specific medical food (Heart Bars, Nellson Nutraceutical) containing L-arginine 6.6 grams and antioxidant vitamins daily starting at 14-32 weeks gestation and continuing until delivery reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia by 44% when compared with a bar containing antioxidant vitamins alone in patients at high risk of pre-eclampsia (91197). Based on these results, one case of pre-eclampsia is prevented for every 11 high risk patients treated with this L-arginine-containing medical food.
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. Intravenous L-arginine may have beneficial effects in pregnancy-induced hypertension. Details: Some clinical research in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension shows that intravenous infusion of L-arginine 20 grams daily for up to 5 days decreases systolic blood pressure by 2% to 3% and diastolic blood pressure by about 3% when compared with placebo (31933,31961,31978). Clinical research in patients with pre-existing hypertension has also been conducted. One clinical trial shows that taking L-arginine 4 grams by mouth daily for 10-12 weeks does not seem to reduce blood pressure in those with pre-existing hypertension or mild gestational hypertension. However, these results are confounded by the fact that more patients taking placebo needed to be placed on antihypertensive therapy during the study. L-arginine reduced the risk of being placed on antihypertensive drug therapy during the pregnancy by 47% when compared with placebo (32191). Based on this study, for every 5 patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension treated with L-arginine over placebo, antihypertensive drug therapy is avoided in one additional patient. L-arginine has also been investigated in combination with other ingredients in patients with pre-existing hypertension. Preliminary clinical research in patients with pre-existing hypertension and a previous history of pre-eclampsia, stillbirth, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), or other placenta vascular disorder shows that taking L-arginine and other ingredients starting at 14 weeks gestation prevents an increase in blood pressure and reduces the percentage of patients requiring new antihypertensive medication by about 73% compared with 24.5% of those not taking this combination. In this study, L-arginine 3 grams daily was taken with magnesium 350 mg and salicylate 100 mg. Therefore, the effect of L-arginine alone is unclear. All patients in the study were taking low dose aspirin 100 mg daily (110382).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Chronic kidney disease (CKD). Oral or intravenous L-arginine does not seem to improve CKD. Details: Most preliminary clinical research shows that taking L-arginine, either orally for up to 6 months or intravenously short-term, does not improve kidney function, glomerular filtration rate, or renal plasma flow in patients with CKD, although proteinuria may be reduced in some patients (31844,31904,32235,32303).
• Hypercholesterolemia. Oral L-arginine does not seem to reduce cholesterol levels. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking L-arginine 21 grams daily for 4 weeks does not reduce plasma lipids (1363). Furthermore, meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking L-arginine for up to about 6 months does not reduce total or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in populations of healthy individuals or those with cardiovascular disease risk factors. However, there was a very small effect on fasting triglyceride levels (102590,102591).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral L-arginine does not seem to improve outcomes after MI. Details: Patients who have had an ST-segment MI who take L-arginine within 24 hours to 21 days, titrated up to a dose of 3 grams three times a day for up to 6 months, do not seem to have reduced vascular stiffness or increased ejection fraction (13221,32137). Also, there is some concern that long-term use of L-arginine might actually worsen outcomes and increase mortality in these patients (13221). Population studies also suggest that intake of L-arginine does not reduce the risk of experiencing an acute coronary event such as MI or coronary heart disease-related mortality (3332,6896,7821,10637).
• Tuberculosis. Oral L-arginine does not seem to improve symptoms or the clearance of tuberculosis infection. Details: Clinical research shows that taking L-arginine (ArgimaxH) 6 grams daily orally for 8 weeks, with or without vitamin D, does not improve symptoms of tuberculosis or the clearance of tuberculosis infection when used with standard treatment (91196).
• Wound healing. Oral L-arginine does not seem to improve wound healing. Details: Clinical research shows that taking L-arginine (as arginine aspartate) 17 grams orally in three divided doses daily for 2 weeks does not improve epithelialization in healthy, elderly patients with catheter wounds, although it may improve collagen deposition (32247). Also, taking L-arginine (as L-arginine hydrochloride) 26 grams daily for 5 days perioperatively does not improve angiogenesis, re-epithelialization, or neutrophil count in patients undergoing skin graft donation when compared with placebo (20692). In addition, taking a wound-specific oral nutrition supplement containing L-arginine 4.5 grams, zinc, and vitamin C twice daily for 4 weeks, along with standard wound care for 8 weeks, is no more effective for wound healing than a standard oral nutrition supplement along with standard wound care (90198). L-arginine has also been studied in combination with other ingredients. Taking L-arginine enterally or orally, before or after surgery, in combination with ribonucleic acid (RNA) and either eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) or fish oil, seems to improve wound healing when compared with a control group (5531,32174). Another observational study conducted in Italy in newborns shows that applying a specific topical powder containing L-arginine, arnica extract, zinc oxide, and other ingredients (Cicaben, Orsana Italia S.r.l.) to the newborn's umbilical cord stump 3 to 4 times daily until stump detachment reduces the rates of mild complications 48 hours after discharge such as a wet cord stump but does not change the time to cord stump detachment or the rates of purulent secretions or umbilical granulomas when compared with standard dry care. However, no differences were noted between the groups one week after discharge (113662). The validity of these results is limited by the observational nature of the study and the ability of the parents to select a treatment group. It is unclear if the effects in these studies are due to L-arginine, other ingredients, or the combination.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-arginine may prevent ARDS. Details: A meta-analysis of three small studies shows that taking L-arginine 3 grams daily, starting in the second or third trimester usually until delivery, reduces the risk of ARDS in the infant by about 54% when compared to control, including placebo or no treatment (110379).
• Altitude sickness. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial in patients with altitude sickness. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking L-arginine 4 grams orally three times daily for 2 days while ascending to a high altitude and for 24 hours while at high altitude does not reduce altitude sickness when compared with placebo (31955).
• Anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Although there is interest in using oral L-arginine for anthracycline cardiotoxicity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-arginine for this purpose.
• Anemia of chronic disease. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Details: One very small clinical study in elderly adults with chronic kidney disease and anemia shows that taking L-arginine orally 1.3 grams daily might increase hemoglobin and erythropoietin levels in some patients when compared to baseline (31988). The validity of these findings is limited by the small study size and the lack of a comparator group.
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial in patients with asthma. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with severe asthma shows that taking L-arginine 0.05 gram/kg ideal body weight twice daily does not reduce asthma exacerbations when compared with placebo (104223). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference in exacerbation rates between groups. While other studies have shown adverse airway effects in patients with asthma (121,31849), this study demonstrated no change in exacerbations and reported no adverse airway effects.
• Athletic performance. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-arginine may improve measures of athletic performance. Details: A meta-analysis of 5 small clinical trials shows that taking L-arginine seems to modestly improve measures of cardiorespiratory fitness, as measured by a 0.07 L/minute increase in maximal oxygen uptake, when compared with control (105064). L-arginine has also been examined for its effects on athletic performance. Most research suggests that taking L-arginine does not improve athletic performance. However, clinical trials are small and may not be adequately powered to detect a difference in these outcomes Taking L-arginine as a single dose of 5 or 6 grams or as 5-10 grams daily for 2-4 weeks does not improve grip strength, strength during resistance exercise, power output during cycling, or muscle function during recovery from intense resistance exercise in healthy adults (91190,97393,99265,110381,110389). Also, taking L-arginine 5 grams daily for 4 weeks (Bioarginina Farmaceutici Damor) or 8 grams daily for 8 days does not increase swim speed (110381,110386). In contrast, some research suggests that drinking a single beverage containing the same dose of L-arginine 6 grams increases the time to exhaustion during high-intensity exercise when compared with placebo (32180). Also, a meta-analysis of small clinical trials shows that supplementation with L-arginine has a large beneficial effect on aerobic performance and a small beneficial effect on anaerobic performance. However, publication bias was evident in the aerobic performance data, limiting these conclusions. Doses found to be beneficial in this analysis included an acute dose of L-arginine 0.15 gram/kg 60-90 minutes before performance or chronic dosing of 1.5 grams to 2 grams daily for 4-7 weeks for aerobic performance. The chronic dose of L-arginine most likely to be beneficial for anaerobic performance is unclear from this analysis due to inclusion of studies using arginine alpha-ketoglutarate (110395). With the exception of a few studies which include a very small number of healthy females (99265,110395,110386), research on the use of L-arginine for athletic performance has focused almost exclusively on healthy males. Also, studies are heterogeneous with respect to sport and endpoints. Therefore, whether results can be applied to females or specific athletes is unclear. L-arginine has also been evaluated in overweight males. One small clinical study shows that taking a single dose of L-arginine 6 grams 90 minutes prior to high-intensity interval training seems to improve exercise tolerance by improving ventilation, heart rate, and oxygen uptake when compared with placebo (105060). L-arginine has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. Research in male soccer players shows that taking L-arginine 1.2 grams and L-citrulline 1.2 grams daily for 7 days increases total power output over a 10-minute cycling test and improves subjective perceptions of exertion when compared with placebo (100956). Another study shows that taking L-arginine 1.5 or 3 grams daily, in combination with grape seed extract, increases physical working capacity at fatigue threshold when compared with pretreatment in untrained, college-aged males (32164).
• Beta-thalassemia. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial in children with beta-thalassemia. Details:Preliminary clinical research in children aged 6-18 years treated conventionally for pulmonary hypertension related to beta-thalassemia shows that taking L-arginine 0.1 mg/kg daily for 60 days reduces Doppler echocardiography pulmonary arterial pressure by 35% compared with baseline. This measurement was increased by up to 15% in children given conventional treatments only; however, a statistical comparison between these treatment groups was lacking (110391).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial in patients with breast cancer. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking L-arginine 30 grams daily for 3 days prior to chemotherapy does not improve the clinical response rate in breast cancer patients when compared with placebo (32282).
• Cognitive impairment. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial in patients with cognitive impairment. Details: A small clinical trial in frail adults aged 65 years of age and up with hypertension shows that taking L-arginine (Bioarginina) 1.66 grams twice daily for 4 weeks modestly improves cognitive function when compared to placebo (110385).
• Congestive heart failure (CHF). It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial in patients with CHF. Details: One small clinical study in patients with CHF stage 2-3 shows that taking L-arginine 15 grams daily for 5 days, in combination with conventional treatment, seems to improve glomerular filtration rate (GFR), creatinine clearance, and sodium and water elimination after saline loading, indicating an improvement in kidney function (3596).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial in patients with severe COVID-19 infection. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with severe COVID-19 shows that receiving oral L-arginine (Argin, Nutrigrow, India) 3 grams daily for a maximum of 10 days while on oxygen support does not affect the percentage of patients weaned off oxygen support after 10 days, the length of time requiring oxygen support, the duration of hospitalization, or the incidence of adverse thrombotic events, compared with placebo (110392). This study may not have been adequately powered to detect differences between groups. An interim analysis of a small clinical trial in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 shows that adding oral L-arginine (Bioarginina, Farmaceutici Damor) 1.66 grams twice daily to standard therapy throughout hospitalization increases the rate of respiratory support reduction by 60% after 10 days of therapy, but not after 20 days of therapy, when compared with placebo. L-arginine also significantly reduced the length of hospital stay. The median hospital stay was 25 days and 46 days, respectively, for L-arginine and placebo (106500). L-arginine has also been investigated in combination with other ingredients for post-acute COVID symptoms. Preliminary clinical research in adults with persistent fatigue following a COVID infection shows that taking L-arginine 1.66 grams plus vitamin C 500 mg (Bioarginina C, Farmaceutici Damor) twice daily for 28 days increases the distance walked in 6 minutes by 30 meters and reduces the percentage of patients with fatigue by about 89%, when compared with placebo. Grip strength was also increased (110390).
• Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial for preventing complications after CABG surgery. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that venous infusion of L-arginine hydrochloride 30 grams as a 10% solution over 15 minutes helps maintain mean arterial pressure, coronary vascular resistance, and graft blood flow when compared with a placebo infusion in patients that have undergone CABG (31840). Administering L-arginine 7.5 grams in 500 mL of cardioplegic solution also seems to reduce wedge pressure and intensive care unit stay in patients undergoing CABG; however, it does not reduce hospital stay duration or postoperative complications when compared with cardioplegic solution alone (31958,31886).
• Critical illness (trauma). Oral L-arginine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effects when used alone are unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking L-arginine orally with glutamine, nucleotides, and omega-3 fatty acids reduces the recovery time, the need for ventilation, and infection rates in critically ill patients, but does not reduce the risk of mortality (31853).
• Cyclosporine-induced nephrotoxicity. Although there is interest in using oral L-arginine for cyclosporine-induced nephrotoxicity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-arginine for this purpose.
• Cystic fibrosis. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial in patients with cystic fibrosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in teens and adults with cystic fibrosis shows that twice daily inhalation with L-arginine 500 mg for 2 weeks does not improve lung function when compared with inhaling 2.6% hypertonic saline twice daily (96807).
• Dental caries. Small clinical studies suggest that using a dentifrice containing L-arginine might prevent dental caries. Details: A meta-analysis of small studies shows that use of a dentifrice containing L-arginine 1.5% w/w in combination with calcium base (Dical or calcium carbonate) and fluoride 1450 ppm 2-3 times daily for up to 2 years reduces the risk of developing dental caries by a small to moderate amount when compared with a dentifrice containing only fluoride in children and adults (96806). Also, preliminary clinical research shows that using a confection containing an L-arginine complex (CaviStat) for one year reduces the number of dental caries in molars of children when compared with a sugarless mint control (32011). L-arginine has also been investigated as a prebiotic in combination with probiotics. In 5- to 9-year-old children with low caries risk, clinical research shows that taking one lozenge daily for 10-12 months containing arginine 20 mg along with Lacticaseibacillus paracasei and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, modestly reduces caries severity, but does not reduce caries progression, active caries lesions, plaque, or gingivitis, when compared with placebo (113241,113242).
• Dental hypersensitivity. Oral L-arginine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that using a toothpaste containing L-arginine, calcium, and fluoride twice daily reduces dentin hypersensitivity when compared with pretreatment or control (32130,32131,32132,32177). Another moderate-sized clinical study in adults shows that applying a topical combination of L-arginine 10% and ibuprofen to tooth enamel surfaces for 10 minutes prior to in-office tooth bleaching reduces the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity when compared with placebo (115354). It is unclear whether the effects are due to L-arginine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Diabetes. Small, low-quality studies suggest that oral L-arginine does not improve glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of small, low-quality studies shows that taking L-arginine 2-20 grams daily for up to 77 weeks decreases fasting blood glucose and serum insulin levels in adults without diabetes. However, no improvements occurred in adults WITH type 2 diabetes. This may be explained by previous studies which suggest L-arginine affects glucose control only in the early steps of beta-cell dysfunction. L-arginine did not improve insulin resistance or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in patients with or without diabetes (104225). Also, a prospective observational study in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes has found that taking a specific product (Flebotrofine, AMNOL Chimica Biologica) containing L-arginine for 3 months is not associated with improvements in HbA1c, cholesterol, or triglyceride levels when compared with baseline. Other ingredients in this product included diosmin, troxerutin, hesperidin, black currant extract, and gotu kola extract (108151). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Diabetic foot ulcers. It is unclear if oral or subcutaneous L-arginine is beneficial in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Details: A very small clinical study shows that administering L-arginine subcutaneously at the site of diabetic foot ulcers does not decrease healing time or rate of amputation when combined with conventional therapies (14914). Also, taking a specific drink containing L-arginine 7 grams, L-glutamine 7 grams, and calcium hydroxymethylbutyrate (HMB) 1.5 grams (Juven/Abound, Abbott Nutrition) orally twice daily for 16 weeks does not improve diabetic foot ulcer healing when compared with a control drink in non-ischemic patients or those with normal albumin levels. However, in specific populations with low albumin and/or poor limb perfusion, up to 74% more patients had total wound healing when compared with the control drink (96637).
• Diabetic neuropathy. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking L-arginine 3 grams daily for 3 months does not improve circulation, disability, or nerve function in patients with diabetic neuropathy when compared with placebo (32145).
• Head and neck cancer. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial in patients with head and neck cancer. Details: Small clinical studies suggest that enteral nutrition supplemented with L-arginine does not seem to have any beneficial effects on markers of immune function such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), length of postoperative hospital stay, or fistula rates; however, it seems to reduce wounds and general infections after surgery in patients with head and neck cancer when compared with control (10160,32008).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial in patients with heart failure. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with heart failure shows that taking L-arginine 3.0-12.6 grams orally daily for 6-12 weeks does not consistently improve exercise tolerance or peripheral vascular resistance (3595,6028,32138). However, some research shows that taking L-arginine 1000 mg three times daily for 10 weeks modestly improves measures of cardiac function compared with placebo (110380). Although some research disagrees (32138), most research shows that taking L-arginine modestly improves quality of life (3595,110380).
• Heart transplant complications. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial in patients that have received a heart transplant. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking L-arginine 6 grams orally twice daily for 6 weeks increases walking distance and oxygen uptake and delays the ventilatory threshold in heart transplant patients when compared with baseline (32150).
• HIV/AIDS-related wasting. Oral L-arginine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One clinical study in patients with HIV/AIDS shows that taking L-arginine orally, in combination with hydroxymethylbutyrate (HMB) and glutamine for 8 weeks, increases body weight, particularly lean body mass, and positively affects immune status when compared with placebo (1909). However, other clinical research in HIV-positive patients shows that taking L-arginine 7.4 grams daily orally, in combination with omega-3 fatty acids and a balanced oral nutritional supplement for 6 months, does not improve body weight or fat mass, total energy intake, or immune status when compared to taking the nutritional supplement alone (113).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral L-arginine can prevent the development of type 2 diabetes in adults with prediabetes. Details: Clinical research shows that taking L-arginine (Bioarginine, Farmaceutici Damor) 3.2 grams orally twice daily for 18 months does not reduce the incidence of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). However, when assessed one year after treatment discontinuation, patients who took L-arginine had a 58% lower risk of developing diabetes when compared with placebo (91195).
• Infertility. It is unclear if oral L-arginine improves outcomes in people undergoing an assisted reproductive technology (ART) program. Details: Some preliminary clinical research shows that taking L-arginine 16 grams daily decreases the cancellation rate of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and increases the number of oocytes collected in females undergoing an ART program when compared with control. However, taking L-arginine does not seem to improve the number of viable pregnancies (31842). A small clinical study of females undergoing an ART program shows that taking a combination product containing L-arginine 1 gram with folate 200 mcg or L-arginine 2 grams, folate 400 mcg, and vitamin E 10 mg daily for 12 weeks does not affect the hCG-positive rate or clinical pregnancy rate when compared with placebo. A subgroup analysis suggests that taking these combination products might improve HCG-positive and clinical pregnancy rates in females who are undergoing ART due to male infertility (104224). However, this small study was not adequately powered to detect a difference in these outcomes, limiting the validity of these findings.
• Interstitial cystitis. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-arginine may improve pain in interstitial cystitis. Details: Taking L-arginine orally seems to reduce some symptoms, especially pain, that are associated with interstitial cystitis (107,114,3460,31855,32267). Research shows that patients with interstitial cystitis having a bladder capacity greater than 800 mL and/or a history of recurrent genitourinary infections might respond more favorably to L-arginine than patients with bladder capacity less than 800 mL and/or no history of recurrent genitourinary infections. Three months of treatment may be necessary before significant symptom improvement occurs (3460). However, L-arginine does not seem to reduce the need to urinate at night or improve urgency or frequency of urination (3460,31855).
• Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Small clinical studies suggest that oral or intravenous L-arginine may increase birthweight in IUGR. Details: A meta-analysis of mainly small studies shows that L-arginine given orally or intravenously in the third trimester for a time period of 7 days or until delivery increases the birthweight by up to 650 grams in patients with an IUGR pregnancy. Furthermore, there is evidence from a small number of these studies that L-arginine supplementation decreases the risk of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and fetal intracranial hemorrhage (96804). A more recent meta-analysis of small studies also shows that taking L-arginine 3 grams daily, starting in the second or third trimester usually until delivery, reduces the risk of an IUGR infant by about 32% when compared to control, including placebo or no treatment (110379). Doses used in clinical research have usually been 3 grams daily orally, although some studies have used up to 20 grams intravenously (31930,31937,96804,110379). However, supplementation with L-arginine does not seem to increase birthweight or reduce neonatal mortality or morbidity when compared with placebo in patients with severe IUGR (32083).
• Kidney transplant. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-arginine may not improve kidney function in patients after kidney transplantation. Details: Although preliminary clinical research showed some benefit, evidence from other clinical research shows that infusion with L-arginine does not increase renal plasma flow or glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplant patients treated with cyclosporine, including those experiencing transplant dysfunction (112,31876,32229). Other evidence suggests that intravenous L-arginine improves kidney function only in transplant patients receiving organs with a short cold ischemia time or those receiving kidneys from young donors (31887).
• Male infertility. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial in males with infertility. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking L-arginine 4 grams daily for 12 weeks does not improve semen quality in males with oligospermia when compared with placebo (32209). However, one small clinical study shows that a specific formulation of L-arginine aspartate and maritime pine bark extract (Prelox), taken for 6 months, improves sperm quality in males with idiopathic male infertility when compared to baseline (32061). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Additionally, it is unclear if this effect is due to L-arginine, maritime pine bark, or the combination.
• Mitochondrial myopathies. Small clinical studies suggest that intravenous L-arginine may modestly improve symptoms in patients with MELAS (mitochondrial encephalopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes syndrome). Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that infusions of L-arginine, 0.5 grams/kg administered within one hour of stroke-like symptoms, improves headaches, nausea, vomiting, transient blindness, and the appearance of bright spots when compared to pretreatment in patients with MELAS (31943,99263). Also, taking oral L-arginine 4-24 grams daily for 18 months seems to reduce the frequency and severity of stroke-like symptoms associated with MELAS when compared to baseline (31943). However, other preliminary clinical research shows that taking oral L-arginine 0.3-0.5 grams/kg daily in three divided doses for 2 years does not reduce the severity of MELAS symptoms, including migraine and stroke-like episodes. If a stroke-like episode did occur, administration of intravenous L-arginine 0.5 grams/kg improved headache, nausea, vomiting, and visual disturbance (99263). The validity of this research is limited by the small study sizes and the absence of comparator groups.
• Migraine headache. Although there is interest in using oral L-arginine for migraine, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-arginine for this condition.
• Muscular dystrophy. There is limited evidence on the oral use of L-arginine in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Details: A very small study in five children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, shows that drinking a beverage containing L-arginine hydrochloride (L-Arginine Hydrochloride, Selectchemie) 2.5 grams three times daily, in addition to metformin 250 mg twice daily, for 16 weeks improves motor function by 4% and increases distance walked in two minutes by 9.6 meters when compared to baseline (96805). The validity of these findings is limited by the very small study size and lack of a comparator group.
• Nitrate tolerance. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial for nitrate tolerance. Details: A very small crossover study in adults with stable angina shows that taking L-arginine orally 700 mg four times daily for up to 10 days seems to prevent tolerance to transdermal nitrate when compared with placebo (8475).
• Obesity. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-arginine may be beneficial for weight loss. Details: A meta-analysis of mainly small clinical trials shows that taking L-arginine daily for at least 8 weeks modestly reduces body weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference when compared with placebo. However, when taking L-arginine for less than 8 weeks, BMI and body weight were not affected. The optimal dose of L-arginine was 2-6 grams (110398). An additional small clinical study suggests that taking a specific arginine supplement (NOW Foods) 3 grams by mouth three times daily for 12 weeks, in addition to receiving dietary counseling, reduces waist circumference by 4-6 cm and reduces body weight by 1.8-2.9 kg when compared to baseline in obese females 18-40 years of age (91193). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Oral mucositis. Oral L-arginine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study shows that taking a specific combination of L-arginine 7 grams, L-glutamine 7 grams, and hydroxymethylbutyrate (HMB) 1.2 grams (Abound; Abbott) in water twice daily during chemoradiotherapy treatment for head and neck cancer does not reduce the incidence of severe oral mucositis when compared with a historical control (99243). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a placebo control. Additionally, a small open-label study in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer shows that taking a specific combination product (Abound, Abbot) containing L-arginine, glutamine, and HMB twice daily throughout chemoradiation treatments decreases the incidence of grade 3 or higher oral mucositis and ameliorates body weight loss when compared with no intervention (113726). However, the incidence of grade 2 or higher oral mucositis was not reduced. It is unclear if this effect is due to L-arginine, other ingredients, or the combination. Additionally, the validity of the study is limited by the lack of blinding.
• Periodontitis. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial in patients with periodontitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with chronic periodontitis shows that using L-arginine aspartate (Yuria-Pharm, Ukraine) 1 gram three times daily orally for 10 days after scaling and root planing, modestly reduces bleeding on probing but not periodontal pocket depth, when compared with untreated controls (108926).
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial for improving physical performance in older adults. Details: A small study in physically active females 65 years of age and older shows that taking L-arginine 8 grams as a single dose does not improve lower body strength, measured by knee flexion and extension tests, or functional performance, measured by sit-stand, tandem gait, and timed up-and-go tests, when compared with placebo (96812).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Oral L-arginine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a combination of N-acetylcysteine 1200 mg daily plus L-arginine 1600 mg daily for 6 months modestly improves menstrual function and decreases insulin resistance in patients with PCOS when compared to baseline (32094). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Postoperative infection. Oral L-arginine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Small clinical studies show that taking L-arginine, enterally or orally, either before or after surgery, in combination with fish oil, or with ribonucleic acid (RNA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), seems to reduce the rate of perioperative infection when compared with a control group. The risk of infection was 41% lower when compared to taking no arginine-based formulations. However, there is no good evidence to support the use of L-arginine alone for this purpose, and it is possible that this effect is due to the other ingredients or the combination of ingredients (5531,32174,32196).
• Postoperative recovery. Oral L-arginine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Small clinical studies show that taking L-arginine, enterally or orally, either before or after surgery, in combination with fish oil, or with ribonucleic acid (RNA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), seems to reduce the recovery time after surgery or serious illness when compared with a control group. This seems to be related to a reduced number of perioperative infections and improved wound healing. However, there is no good evidence to support the use of L-arginine alone for this purpose, and it is possible that this effect is due to the other ingredients or the combination of ingredients (5531,32174,32196). The effect of another combination product containing L-arginine is unclear. In one clinical study, taking a combination product (Abound, Abbott) containing L-arginine 7 grams, glutamine 7 grams, and hydroxymethylbutyrate 1.2 grams orally daily for 3 days before and 7 days after abdominal surgery did not reduce the incidence of wound infection or other complications when compared with placebo (99413). However, when a similar combination of L-arginine 14 grams, glutamine 14 grams, and hydroxymethylbutyrate 3 grams (Heallagen) was taken orally daily for one month before heart surgery, the length of hospital and ICU stay were reduced by about one day. Recovery, based on some but not all biochemical or other measurements, was also improved. However, there was no difference in risk of overall postoperative complications (110394). The discrepancies between these two studies may be related to differences in the dose or duration of the combination product and/or the type of surgery.
• Pressure ulcers. Oral L-arginine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Oral L-arginine has been evaluated in combination with other ingredients for the treatment of grade II-IV pressure ulcers. Two small clinical studies in hospitalized patients show that administering an oral nutritional supplement enriched with L-arginine, zinc, and vitamin C improves ulcer healing when compared with a standard diet (31953,87173). A small preliminary clinical study in sedentary older adults in care facilities shows that giving an oral or enteral combination of L-arginine 7.4 grams, L-glutamine 7.4 grams, and hydroxymethylbutyrate (HMB) 1.3 grams (Abound, Abbott) daily for 20 weeks reduces median time to healing by 48 days when compared with standard care only (110396). Also, preliminary clinical research in patients living in long-term care facilities with grade II-IV pressure ulcers shows that taking an oral nutritional supplement enriched in protein, energy, L-arginine, vitamin C, and zinc daily for 9 weeks reduces ulcer area and decreases oozing when compared to baseline (32045). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Preterm labor. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-arginine may prevent preterm labor. Details: A meta-analysis of three small studies shows that taking L-arginine 3-6.6 grams daily, starting in the second or third trimester usually until delivery, reduces the risk of preterm labor by about 50% when compared to control, usually placebo (110379).
• Pulmonary hypertension. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial in children with pulmonary hypertension related to beta-thalassemia. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children aged 6-18 years treated conventionally for pulmonary hypertension related to beta-thalassemia shows that taking L-arginine 0.1 mg/kg daily for 60 days reduces Doppler echocardiography pulmonary arterial pressure by 35% compared with baseline. This measurement was increased by up to 15% in children given conventional treatments only; however, a statistical comparison between these treatment groups was lacking (110391).
• Radiation dermatitis. Oral L-arginine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with head and neck cancer shows that taking a combination of L-arginine 7 grams, L-glutamine 7 grams, and hydroxymethylbutyrate (HMB) 1.2 grams (Abound, Abbott) in water twice daily from the first day of radiation to approximately 1 week after completion does not reduce the number of patients with severe dermatitis when compared with taking no supplement. However, there was a 34% reduction in the incidence of moderate dermatitis and the overall duration of dermatitis was reduced (96639).
• Restenosis. It is unclear if intravenous L-arginine helps to prevent restenosis after stent implantation. Details: Some clinical research suggests that intravenous and intracoronary infusion of L-arginine during stent implantation followed by oral L-arginine for 2 weeks does not reduce the risk of restenosis when compared with placebo (31925). However, local delivery of 6 mL of L-arginine 100 mg/mL for 15 minutes after stent deployment seems to reduce neointimal formation at 6 months after stent placement when compared with placebo (31883).
• Respiratory tract infections. Although there is interest in using oral L-arginine for respiratory tract infections, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-arginine for these conditions.
• Schizophrenia. It is unclear if oral L-arginine is beneficial in patients with schizophrenia. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking L-arginine 3 grams twice daily for 3 weeks, in conjunction with an individualized medication regimen, does not improve positive, negative, or depressive symptoms associated with schizophrenia when compared with taking the medication regimen alone (99264).
• Sexual dysfunction. Oral L-arginine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in females with sexual dysfunction who are taking oral contraceptives shows that taking a specific combination product (Lady Prelox, Horphag Research) containing L-arginine, maritime pine bark extract, L-citrulline, and rose hip extract daily for 8 weeks improves symptoms of sexual dysfunction by 18% when compared with a control group (91963). Taking the same product in a dose of 2 tablets twice daily for 8 weeks, in addition to the lifestyle management program, improves vaginal dryness in pre- and post-menopausal patients when compared with lifestyle management alone (103611). It is unclear if this effect is due to L-arginine, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Sickle cell disease. Small clinical studies suggest that oral or intravenous L-arginine may modestly improve complications in patients with sickle cell disease. Details: Two small clinical studies in hospitalized children aged 3-19 years with sickle cell disease-related veno-occlusive crisis shows that administering L-arginine intravenously or orally 100 mg/kg three times daily for 5 days or until discharge reduces total opioid use by 26% to 54%, pain scores at discharge by 23%, and median length of hospital stay by about 36 hours when compared with placebo (97392,105063). Another very small clinical study in patients aged 13-63 years with sickle cell disease shows that taking L-arginine 0.1 grams/kg orally three times daily for 5 days reduces pulmonary hypertension when compared to baseline (11428).
• Stress. Oral L-arginine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in healthy adults shows that taking a single dose of L-arginine 50 mg plus L-theanine 200 mg modestly reduces stress associated with a stress-loading test when compared with placebo, but was no more effective than taking L-theanine alone (110393).
• Valproic acid-induced toxicities. Although there is interest in using intravenous L-arginine for valproic acid toxicity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-arginine for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate L-arginine for these uses.

(Read more about L-ARGININE)

EFFECTIVE

• L-carnitine deficiency. Oral and intravenous L-carnitine can treat primary and secondary L-carnitine deficiency. Details: Administering L-carnitine orally or intravenously is effective for acute or chronic treatment of primary L-carnitine deficiency or secondary L-carnitine deficiency due to inborn errors of metabolism. This is an FDA-approved indication for L-carnitine (4949,58611,59018). For primary or secondary deficiencies, oral L-carnitine 990 mg 2-3 times daily is used. For inborn errors of metabolism resulting in secondary L-carnitine deficiency, L-carnitine 50 mg/kg given as a slow (2-3 minute) bolus injection or by infusion followed by 50 mg/kg administered in divided doses every 3-4 hours over the next 24 hours is also used. Subsequent daily maintenance doses of intravenous L-carnitine are usually around 50 mg/kg (3616).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Angina. Oral and intravenous L-carnitine may improve exercise tolerance and symptoms of angina during exercise in patients with angina. Details: Several small clinical trials in patients with chronic stable angina or cardiac syndrome X show that taking L-carnitine orally or intravenously seems to improve exercise tolerance and time to onset of angina when compared with placebo (3623,3624,58156,59096,59118,59216,59217,59230). Oral doses of L-carnitine have ranged from 900 mg to 2 grams daily in single or divided doses for 2 weeks to 6 months (3623,3624,58156,59096,59118,59217). Intravenous L-carnitine 3 grams in 500 mL of 5% dextrose, administered once daily for 14 days (59230), or intravenous DL-carnitine 40 mg/kg administered 30 minutes prior to exercise (59216) have also been used.
• Congestive heart failure (CHF). Oral and intravenous L-carnitine may improve exercise capacity and symptoms of heart failure in patients with CHF. Details: Several small clinical trials in patients with CHF show that taking L-carnitine 1.5-3 grams daily in single or divided doses for up to 34 months or administering intravenous L-carnitine 5 grams daily for 7 days seems to improve symptoms and increase exercise capacity when compared with placebo (3625,3626,58145,58771,58824). Also, taking a specific combination product containing L-carnitine 2250 mg and coenzyme Q10 270 mg (Carni Q-Gel, Tishcon Corporation) daily for 12 weeks appears to improve symptoms of CHF when compared with no treatment (58392).
• Hyperlipidemia. Oral or intravenous L-carnitine may slightly improve lipid levels. Oral, but not intravenous, L-carnitine may also improve lipoprotein(a) levels in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a). Details: Most meta-analyses of clinical research in patients with or without hyperlipidemia show that L-carnitine, given orally at a dose of 76 mg to 3 grams daily or intravenously at a dose of 15-20 mg/kg three times weekly, appears to reduce total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride levels by up to 9.5 mg/dL, 8.3 mg/dL, and 11.2 mg/dL, respectively, while increasing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by up to 1.6 mg/dL. Sub-analyses in patients with elevated levels of specific lipids shows that L-carnitine might be most beneficial in these populations (95073,102019,111886). However, clinical research is generally very low to moderate quality. Also, any effects of L-carnitine on these lipids are modest and might not be considered clinically significant. An umbrella meta-analysis of meta-analyses of clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine orally reduces total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels by only 1.1 mg/dL, 4.8 mg/dL, and 2.5 mg/dL, with increases in HDL cholesterol of 0.7 mg/dL (111896). More information is needed on the effects of L-carnitine on lipid levels specifically in patients with hyperlipidemia. Some research has also evaluated the benefits of L-carnitine in people with hyperlipidemia and elevated lipoprotein(a) levels or those undergoing hemodialysis. Preliminary clinical research and a meta-analysis of clinical research in these populations shows that taking L-carnitine 1-2 grams daily for 8-24 weeks reduces levels of lipoprotein(a) by about 9 mg/dL when compared with control (58155,95073). However, giving L-carnitine intravenously 1 gram three times weekly or 4 grams daily does not improve lipoprotein(a) levels in these patients (95073). Also, oral or intravenous L-carnitine does not improve LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, or triglyceride levels in these patients (58155,95073). Whether L-carnitine reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with hyperlipidemia is unknown.
• Kidney failure. Intravenous, but not oral, L-carnitine is FDA-approved for the prevention and treatment of L-carnitine deficiency in patients with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis. Any other benefits with the use of L-carnitine in patients on hemodialysis are unclear. Details: Patients with kidney failure undergoing maintenance hemodialysis often experience L-carnitine deficiency, which can lead to lipid, red blood cell, cardiac muscle, and skeletal muscle abnormalities (26496). Use of intravenous L-carnitine for the prevention and treatment of L-carnitine deficiency in people with kidney failure who are undergoing hemodialysis is an FDA-approved indication for L-carnitine. L-carnitine 10-20 mg/kg is given as a slow (2-3 minute) bolus injection, with dose adjustments made based on subsequent pre-dialysis L-carnitine concentrations (3616). However, oral L-carnitine is not FDA-approved for this purpose. There is concern that long-term administration of high doses of oral L-carnitine may result in accumulation of toxic metabolites, including trimethylamine and trimethylamine-N-oxide, in patients with kidney failure (3616). Research in other areas are conflicting. Most clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine 0.7-3 grams or 10 mg/kg daily or administering L-carnitine 2-6 grams or 30-60 mg/kg weekly via intravenous infusion can improve cardiac function, intravenous fistula complications, red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and C-reactive protein levels in patients on hemodialysis (9790,26496,58257,58437,58842,59009,59178,111877). A meta-analysis of 18 clinical studies in adults with kidney-related anemia undergoing hemodialysis shows that receiving oral or intravenous L-carnitine reduces erythropoietin responsiveness and erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) requirement, but not hemoglobin level, when compared with placebo or conventional therapy, regardless of treatment duration or route of administration (107406). Despite an earlier meta-analysis suggesting that L-carnitine does not reduce the incidence of dialysis-related hypotension or muscle cramping (58511), a more recent meta-analysis shows that L-carnitine reduces the incidence of dialysis-related hypotension by 74% when compared with placebo (111878). However, sub-analyses suggest that only oral L-carnitine, and doses of over 4.2 grams weekly for at least 12 weeks, are effective for preventing hypotension (111878). A meta-analysis and some preliminary clinical research also show that muscle cramping is reduced by up to 78% when compared with controls (104176,111878). Additionally, observational research has found that administering at least 1 gram of L-carnitine per dialysis session for at least 10 sessions monthly is associated with a 10% to 20% decrease in the number of hospitalization days during the subsequent month (58409). However, L-carnitine may not be beneficial for improving other measures in people with kidney failure receiving dialysis. While some research shows that L-carnitine decreases lipoprotein(a) levels (44187), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels (26496,91723,107399), and total cholesterol levels (107399), most research shows that it does not improve serum lipid levels (9790,26496,44187,58257,58320,58842,58939,59009,59025,59031)(59036,59059,59080,90633,91723,107399). Additionally, while one small clinical trial shows that taking L-carnitine can improve performance on some exercise tests (104179), most research shows that L-carnitine does not improve respiratory function or exercise performance. The effect on quality of life is unclear (58154,58437,58472,58743,59031,90633,111867,111877).
• Male infertility. Oral L-carnitine, taken alone or in combination with acetyl-L-carnitine, may increase sperm motility in males with infertility, leading to a greater likelihood of pregnancy in female partners. Details: Although some clinical research has yielded conflicting results (58209,58588,59020,90627,111861), most clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine 1-3 grams daily in divided doses for up to 24 weeks, with or without acetyl-L-carnitine 1 gram daily, increases sperm count and motility, and improves sperm morphology, in males with infertility of various etiologies (12352,58167,58182,58194,58334,58469,58831,58849,59129,59189)(59190,101560,107394,111861,111459,111888,111890). However, it is unclear if taking L-carnitine increases the odds of pregnancy. One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials shows that taking L-carnitine and acetyl-L-carnitine in combination increases the odds of pregnancy by 3.7-fold over placebo. However most clinical research investigating the effect of L-carnitine alone or with acetyl L-carnitine on pregnancy rates disagrees (12352,58182,101560,111861,111459,111888). The number of studies investigating the effect of L-carnitine alone or with acetyl-L-carnitine on pregnancy rate is small and the duration of supplementation may be inadequate. Taking L-carnitine 1 gram and acetyl-L-carnitine 0.5 grams twice daily after taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for 2 months seems to increase sperm count and motility in males with abacterial prostatovesiculoepididymitis, an inflammation of the prostate gland, seminal vesicles, and epididymis (9791). Some studies have also evaluated L-carnitine in combination with other ingredients. One clinical trial in males with asthenospermia shows that taking L-carnitine 150 mg, acetyl-L-carnitine 50 mg, L-arginine 1660 mg, and Panax ginseng 200 mg daily for 3 months increases sperm motility and sexual satisfaction when compared with no treatment (32189). Another small clinical trial shows that taking this combination along with prulifloxacin 600 mg daily for 6 months improves sperm concentration and motility when compared with prulifloxacin alone in patients with chronic prostatitis due to Chlamydia trachomatis infection (59006). Other small and preliminary clinical studies have investigated the effects of a specific combination product providing L-carnitine 1 gram twice daily for 6 months, along with acetyl-L-carnitine, coenzyme Q10, selenium, zinc, vitamin C, folic acid, vitamin B12, and citric acid (Proxeed Plus). Taking this combination product has been shown to improve measures of sperm quality such as sperm count, sperm concentration, total motility, and progressive motility when compared to baseline. The effect on sperm volume and morphology is unclear. Most research has been conducted in patients with oligoasthenozoospermia, although some benefit has also been shown in patients with varicocele-related infertility, especially those with more severe varicocele (102017,107395,111296). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of comparator group. Also, it is unclear if these effects are due to L-carnitine, other ingredients, or the combination. The effect of L-carnitine in combination with other ingredients on pregnancy rate has also been examined. One meta-analysis of moderate-quality clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine in combination with micronutrients increases the odds of pregnancy by 3.5-fold over placebo or no treatment (111888).
• Myocarditis. Oral DL-carnitine may prevent myocarditis in children with diphtheria. Details: Myocarditis is a complication of diphtheria. Clinical research in children with diphtheria shows that taking DL-carnitine 100 mg/kg daily for 4 days reduces the risk of myocarditis and mortality when compared with no treatment (3620,3621).
• Valproic acid-induced toxicities. Although more well-designed research is needed to confirm these findings, oral and intravenous L-carnitine may improve neurologic and hepatic function and reduce ammonia levels in patients with these valproic acid-induced toxicities. Details: Valproic acid-induced toxicities are often associated with low plasma and tissue levels of L-carnitine. Preliminary clinical research and case reports in patients on valproic acid therapy who have neurologic or hepatic deterioration or hyperammonemia show that taking L-carnitine 50-100 mg/kg daily in divided doses or administering L-carnitine 150-500 mg/kg daily via intravenous infusion seems to improve neurologic and hepatic function and bring plasma ammonia levels within normal limits (1438,1914,1915,1916,1917,4523,5798,5799,95068). There is also some preliminary evidence that intravenous L-carnitine can prevent the development of severe valproic acid-induced hepatotoxicity when given to patients being treated for overdose and accidental ingestion of valproic acid (1438,4528,5798,5799), especially if treatment is initiated early (4528). Despite these results, most evidence consists of anecdotal individuals or small case series. A more recent retrospective cohort study suggests that treatment with an L-carnitine dosing regimen consisting of a 100 mg/kg intravenous loading dose followed by up to 3 grams daily in divided doses for 3 days or until ICU discharge does not enhance valproic acid elimination or prevent organ dysfunction when compared with patients not treated with L-carnitine (111869). Also, taking L-carnitine does not appear to reduce valproic acid-associated weight gain (58295). Well-designed clinical trials are still needed to determine the role of L-carnitine in the treatment or prevention of valproic acid toxicities.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Topical L-carnitine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with mild-to-moderate acne shows that applying a proprietary formulation containing L-carnitine, licochalcone, and 1,2-decanediol to the face twice daily for 8 weeks reduces the number of acne lesions and pustules and improves quality of life when compared to baseline. However, the improvements do not appear to be significant when compared with placebo (26493).
• Age-related fatigue. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may improve physical and mental fatigue associated with aging. Details: Two small clinical trials in elderly patients experiencing fatigue after slight physical activity shows that taking L-carnitine 2-4 grams daily for 1-6 months improves physical and mental fatigue, increases muscle mass, and decreases fat mass when compared with placebo (16109,16111).
• Aluminum phosphide poisoning. It is unclear if intravenous L-carnitine is beneficial in people with aluminum phosphide poisoning. Details: A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research in patients with aluminum phosphide poisoning shows that intravenous L-carnitine does not reduce the odds of mortality when compared with control groups receiving routine treatments only (111892). However, only 2 studies were included in the analysis and both studies may have been underpowered to detect differences.
• Alzheimer disease. Oral L-carnitine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease shows that taking L-carnitine tartrate 3.73 grams, in combination with serine, nicotinamide riboside, and N-acetyl cysteine, daily for 28 days and then twice daily for 56 days does not improve cognitive function when compared with taking placebo. However, in patients with the most severe symptoms, there was some modest improvement (110623). This study may have been underpowered to detect differences. Also, the effect of L-carnitine alone is unclear.
• Androgenic alopecia. It is unclear if topical L-carnitine is beneficial in people with androgenic alopecia. Details: One small clinical trial in individuals with androgenic alopecia shows that applying topical L-carnitine 2% solution to the scalp twice daily for 6 months significantly increases the number of terminal hair shafts on the scalp when compared with placebo (58390).
• Anorexia nervosa. Although there has been interest in using oral L-carnitine for anorexia nervosa, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose.
• Anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Oral and intravenous L-carnitine have only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with breast cancer undergoing doxorubicin treatment shows that taking a combination of L-carnitine and vitamin E over 4 21-day treatment cycles decreases the proportion of patients with cardiac events by 24.2% when compared with chemotherapy treatment only. There were also modest beneficial effects on some enzyme measures of cardiac health. Patients received L-carnitine 3 grams intravenously on the first day of each cycle followed by an oral intake of 300 mg 4 times daily for the remaining 20 days. Vitamin E 1800 mg daily was taken orally in 3 divided doses (111891).
• Athletic performance. Oral L-carnitine has been evaluated for its effect on athletic performance in several small and short-term clinical studies, with mixed results. Details: Maximal exercise in trained athletes has been associated with a decrease in plasma L-carnitine levels (3648,58583). Theoretically, restoring these levels with L-carnitine supplementation might have beneficial effects. However, clinical studies examining the use of L-carnitine for athletic performance have reported conflicting results. Some clinical studies show that taking L-carnitine 2 grams, either before exercise or daily for up to 6 weeks, enhances athletic performance and endurance and reduces post-exercise muscle pain in male athletes and healthy untrained males (58450,59182,59185), but other studies do not support these findings (1947,59128,59134). Additionally, although some studies show that taking L-carnitine 1-2 grams or 40 mg/kg before exercise or 4 grams daily for 2 weeks can decrease lactate accumulation and increase oxygen uptake, power output, and time to anabolic threshold during exercise (3649,3650,59061,59184,59186), other studies show no improvement in these outcomes (58471,58775,59033,59045,59069,59128). These discrepancies may be related to the small study sizes, short treatment durations, and variable dosing regimens.
• Atrial fibrillation. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial for preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery. Details: A very small clinical study in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement or valve-sparing aortic root replacement shows that receiving oral L-carnitine (L-Cartin FF, Otsuka Pharmaceutical) 1 gram three times daily, beginning 2 days prior to surgery and continuing for 7 days after surgery, is associated with a postoperative atrial fibrillation rate of 20%, compared with a rate of 60% in a historical age-matched control group not receiving L-carnitine (107408).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in children with ADHD. Details: One small crossover trial in children with ADHD shows that taking L-carnitine 50 mg/kg twice daily for 6 months improves parent and teacher assessments of behavior when compared with placebo (58166).
• Autism spectrum disorder. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may improve some symptoms of autism spectrum disorder. Details: Small clinical trials in children 3-16 years of age with autism spectrum disorder show that taking L-carnitine 50 mg/kg or 150 mg/kg daily for 8 to 12 weeks modestly improves overall symptoms of autism, especially lethargy, social isolation, hyperactivity, and irritability, when compared with taking placebo. However, there is inconsistency between studies with respect to rating scales used and specific endpoints showing improvement. In one study, children remained on any pre-existing medications; in the other two, all children were also taking risperidone (58981,111887,111900).
• Arrhythmia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may reduce the incidence of arrhythmias in patients with premature ventricular contractions. Details: Small clinical trials in patients with premature ventricular contractions show that taking L-carnitine 2 grams twice daily for 45 weeks or 2 grams three times daily for 2 weeks might reduce the incidence of arrhythmias when compared to baseline (59043,59120,59143).
• Asthenopia (eye strain). Oral L-carnitine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in videoterminal users with computer vision syndrome and without dry eye shows that taking a product containing L-carnitine 50 mg, along with zinc and extracts of elderberry, black currant, and eleuthero root (Meramirt CM) daily for 1 month modestly reduces severity of eye strain and sensitivity when compared with not taking this product (111295). It is unclear if these findings are due to L-carnitine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Oral L-carnitine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients in Iran with BPH shows that taking L-carnitine 1000 mg plus coenzyme Q10 daily in addition to finasteride 5 mg daily for 8 weeks modestly improves subjective assessment of sexual function when compared with placebo plus finasteride. There was no effect on prostate symptoms, prostate specific antigen levels, or quality of life (113226). It is unclear if these effects are due to L-carnitine, coenzyme Q10, or the combination.
• Beta-thalassemia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may improve symptoms and reduce complications of beta-thalassemia minor, intermedia, and major. Details: Several small clinical trials in children with beta-thalassemia major show that taking L-carnitine 50 mg/kg daily for 3-6 months might reduce pulmonary artery systolic pressure, increase cardiac output during exercise, and improve progression to puberty (58294,58502,58556). Clinical research in adults with beta-thalassemia intermedia shows that taking L-carnitine with hydroxyurea appears to increase hemoglobin and hematocrit and reduce left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, a measure of pulmonary hypertension (58679). In patients with beta-thalassemia major or intermedia aged 6 years and up, taking L-carnitine 50 mg/kg daily for 6 months normalized left ventricular dilatation and hypertrophy in 30% and 37% of patients, respectively, compared with only 10% in those taking placebo. Cardiac output was also improved, but there were no changes in blood parameters (101565). Clinical research in children with beta-thalassemia minor shows that taking L-carnitine 50 mg/kg daily, with or without folic acid 1 mg daily, for 3 months appears to reduce bone pain by 84% to 87% and increase the number of climbable stairs 3.1- to 5.2-fold when compared with baseline (90631).
• Cachexia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may improve body composition and quality of life in patients with cancer-related cachexia. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with cancer-related cachexia shows that taking L-carnitine 4 grams daily for 12 weeks increases body mass index (BMI) when compared with placebo (59029). Other research shows that taking L-carnitine 4 grams daily with megestrol acetate, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and thalidomide for 5 months is more effective than any single product alone for increasing lean body mass in patients with cancer-related cachexia (23437). Additionally, taking L-carnitine 4 grams daily with megestrol acetate, celecoxib, and antioxidants for 4 months appears more effective than megestrol acetate alone for improving lean body mass, fatigue, and quality of life in these patients (59012).
• Cancer-related fatigue. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial for improving fatigue in patients with advanced cancer. Details: Some cancer patients have low blood levels of L-carnitine, which may reduce energy production and lead to fatigue. Some small clinical trials in patients with advanced cancer show that taking L-carnitine 3-4 grams daily for 7 days significantly improves some measures of fatigue when compared to baseline (16106,16110). However, other higher quality clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine 2-4 grams daily for 4-12 weeks is no more effective than placebo for improving fatigue in advanced cancer patients (26498,58523,59029).
• Celiac disease. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with celiac disease. Details: Some research shows that L-carnitine blood levels are low in patients with celiac disease. One small clinical trial in patients with celiac disease shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams daily for 6 months lowers some measures of fatigue when compared with placebo. However, L-carnitine does not significantly improve measures of depression or quality of life in these patients (16105).
• Chemotherapy-related fatigue. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with fatigue due to sunitinib therapy. Details: A small clinical study in adults with renal cell carcinoma who are experiencing fatigue associated with sunitinib treatment shows that taking L-carnitine 1500 mg daily for 2 weeks modestly improves fatigue severity when compared to baseline (100352). The validity of this finding is limited by the small study size and lack of a comparator group.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with CFS. Details: One small clinical study in adults with CFS shows that taking L-carnitine 1 gram three times daily for 2 months can improve some symptoms of CFS when compared to baseline (3630). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with COPD. Details: One small clinical study in adults with moderate to severe COPD shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams daily for 6 weeks improves exercise performance and walking tolerance when compared with placebo (58213).
• Cirrhosis. Preliminary research suggests that oral L-carnitine may be beneficial in patients with cirrhosis. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with cirrhosis who are receiving branched-chain amino acids supplements to improve nutritional status shows that taking L-carnitine 1 gram orally daily for 6 months, in addition to increasing exercise by 2000 steps per day, does not improve muscle volume, handgrip strength, or leg strength, but does reduce complaints of muscle cramping, when compared to baseline (102124). Another small, uncontrolled clinical trial in patients with cirrhosis shows that taking L-carnitine 1800 mg daily for 6 months does not improve Child-Pugh scores, but may improve quality of life, when compared to baseline (104177). The validity of these studies is limited by the lack of comparator groups. The effect of L-carnitine has also been examined retrospectively in patients with cirrhosis. One retrospective study in matched patients that had been admitted to hospital for cirrhosis suggests that taking L-carnitine for more than 30 days is associated with an increase in survival length by about 21 months compared with not taking L-carnitine. Overall, L-carnitine use was also associated with a 36% to 48% increase in the proportion of patients surviving 1-5 years, with the greatest effect in patients with modest to severe liver dysfunction. The median dose of L-carnitine was 1000 mg daily for at least 6 months is associated with a reduced loss of skeletal muscle compared with not taking L-carnitine (111860). The validity of these studies is limited by their retrospective design.
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial for improving cognitive function in healthy individuals. Details: Low-quality clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine 500 mg as a single dose or 250 mg twice daily for 3 days does not improve cognitive function or memory in otherwise healthy young adults when compared with placebo (58176,95070).
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with CHD. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with CHD shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams prior to exercise does not improve endurance when compared with placebo (58196). Another small clinical trial in patients with CHD shows that taking L-carnitine 1 gram daily for 12 weeks does not improve low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol, or apolipoprotein-B when compared with placebo; however, it does appear to increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and apolipoprotein A-1 levels in these patients (95071).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial for COVID-19 prevention or treatment. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients hospitalized with mild to moderate COVID-19 shows that taking L-carnitine 1 gram 3 times daily for 5 days does not reduce the incidence of fever or cough when compared with standard treatments only. However, all patients taking L-carnitine survived compared with 86% of those given standard treatment only. Also, there were improvements in oxygen saturation and inflammatory measures (111874). Other clinical research in patients with confirmed asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 shows that taking L-carnitine tartrate (Carnipure) 1 gram 3 times daily for 21 days does not prevent the development of severe lung symptoms when compared with taking placebo. However, in a sub-group of patients, lung lesion improvement was significantly better between days 7 and 14. In adults without COVID-19 but living with someone with confirmed disease, taking this product does not prevent COVID-19 when compared with taking placebo. However, the total number of confirmed illnesses in the population was low (111898).
• Critical illness (trauma). It is unclear if oral or nasogastric L-carnitine is beneficial for critical illness. Details: One small clinical trial in critically ill patients in the ICU shows that receiving L-carnitine (BSK, Zist Takhmir Co, Tehran-Iran) 3 grams daily via a nasogastric tube for 7 days modestly improves disease severity, organ function, inflammatory and other laboratory measures when compared with receiving placebo. Also, mortality rate was reduced by approximately 50%. There was no effect on the duration of hospital or ICU stay (111883,111884). However, another small clinical trial in critically ill patients following an acute ischemic stroke shows that oral or nasogastric L-carnitine tartrate 500 mg every 8 hours for 6 days does not affect the duration of mechanical ventilation or hospital or ICU stay, the severity of illness, or 28-day mortality rates, when compared with taking placebo. There was a modest beneficial effect on insulin resistance (111881). This study was small and may have been underpowered to detect differences.
• Diabetes. Oral L-carnitine may improve glycemic control in patients with diabetes, but it is unclear if these improvements are clinically meaningful. It is also unclear if L-carnitine can improve lipid profiles or weight loss in these patients. Details: While individual study results are mixed (58169,58189,58514,58793,90632,96922,101561), meta-analyses of available clinical research in mixed populations shows that taking L-carnitine 200 mg to 4 grams daily reduces fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels, and possibly insulin, and improves insulin resistance, when compared with taking placebo or a control diet, although the clinical significance of these improvements is unclear (102018,111875,111886). One meta-analysis shows that these benefits are generally specific to patients with high levels of fasting glucose, diabetes, or obesity, as well as studies investigating L-carnitine in doses of at least 2 grams daily for 12 weeks. However, a small number of studies included in this analysis investigated the effects of acetyl-L-carnitine (111875). Other research in obese patients with type 2 diabetes shows that, when taken with orlistat or sibutramine, L-carnitine 2 grams daily for 12 months decreases body weight and body mass index and improves glycemic control when compared with orlistat or sibutramine alone (58778,58830,58882). The effect of L-carnitine on lipids in people with diabetes is unclear. Some studies show significant reductions in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and/or lipoprotein(a) (58554,58647,58649,90632,101561,107397), while other studies show no improvement in lipid profiles (58169,58189).
• Dilated cardiomyopathy. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may improve ejection fraction in children with dilated cardiomyopathy and adults with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Details: Primary L-carnitine deficiency is a common cause of pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy. Additionally, patients with dilated cardiomyopathy of unknown etiology have been shown to have low cardiac levels of L-carnitine (59196,100351). Due to these findings, L-carnitine has been evaluated for the treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy in children and adults, but the small sizes of these studies and methodological limitations limit the reliability of the results. One small clinical study in children under 13 years of age with dilated cardiomyopathy shows that taking L-carnitine 50-100 mg/kg daily for 1 year in conjunction with standard care improves ejection fraction and reduces left atrial and ventricular diameters when compared with placebo and standard care (100351). The results of this study are limited by the small sample size, unclear etiology of dilated cardiomyopathy, and potential bias. Another small clinical study in children under 5 years of age with dilated cardiomyopathy and low serum levels of L-carnitine shows that taking L-carnitine 100 mg/kg daily for 3 months improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), cardiac output, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification when compared with baseline (59196). Further research is needed to clarify whether L-carnitine is beneficial for most children with dilated cardiomyopathy, or only those with carnitine deficiency. L-carnitine has also been evaluated in older adults. A meta-analysis of clinical studies in mostly older adults with dilated cardiomyopathy shows that addition of intravenous L-carnitine, alone or followed by oral L-carnitine, 1-6 grams daily to conventional therapy for a total of 10-28 days is associated with a 28% increased likelihood of overall efficacy, with improvements observed in both LVEF and cardiac output, when compared with conventional therapy alone (107405). The validity of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies, potential publication bias, and unclear reporting. A small individual clinical study in older adults with ischemic cardiomyopathy shows that taking oral L-carnitine daily for 2 months improves LVEF when compared with baseline (58150). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Dry eye. Topical L-carnitine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Evidence suggests that chronic use of eye drops containing benzalkonium chloride can cause tear film instability and lead to dry eye (90921). One small clinical trial in patients with glaucoma using eye drops containing benzalkonium chloride shows that using additional eye drops containing L-carnitine (1.017%), eledoisin (0.04%), taurine (0.49%), sodium hyaluronate (0.20 grams/100 mL), and vitamin E acetate (0.20 grams/100 mL) (Carnidrop Plus, Sigma-Tau) three times daily for 15 days reduces dry eye symptoms by approximately 50% when compared to baseline (90625). It is unclear if these findings are due to L-carnitine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Endometriosis. Although there has been interest in using oral L-carnitine for endometriosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose.
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine tartrate is beneficial for exercise recovery. Details: A small clinical study in healthy males and females participating in moderate physical activity at least 3 days weekly shows that taking a specific product (Carnipure, Lonza Consumer Health, Inc.) providing elemental L-carnitine 2 grams daily for 5 weeks improves perceived recovery and soreness as well as serum creatine kinase levels by 33% and 28%, respectively, when compared with placebo (107398).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may slightly reduce exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: Evidence from mostly small clinical trials, when considered alone or combined via meta-analysis, shows that taking L-carnitine 1-3 grams daily for around 3 weeks modestly reduces exercise-induced muscle soreness, especially in the period of 24-48 hours after exercise. Benefits may last up to 96 hours post-exercise. Levels of creatinine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, and myoglobin also appear to improve with L-carnitine supplementation, reflecting a reduction in muscle damage (58326,58709,59148,101567).
• Hepatic encephalopathy. Oral or intravenous L-carnitine may improve biochemical markers of disease severity in patients with hepatic encephalopathy, but L-carnitine does not seem to improve clinically important outcomes such as fatigue, quality of life, or overall disease severity. Details: A meta-analysis of nine studies in adults with hepatic encephalopathy shows that taking L-carnitine 1-6 grams daily orally or intravenously for up to 90 days increases albumin levels and decreases plasma levels of ammonia, bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine, but does not improve fatigue or quality of life, when compared with placebo (102122). A more recent clinical trial shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams daily for 24 weeks modestly improves bilirubin levels and some measures of cognitive and liver health, but not quality of life, when compared with taking placebo (111876). Two of the clinical trials included in this analysis also show that taking L-carnitine 2 grams daily for 60-90 days significantly improves cognitive function when compared with placebo in adults with hepatic encephalopathy (58174,58204). Another small clinical trial in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis shows that L-carnitine improves psychometric response to the ammonia tolerance test, suggesting that L-carnitine might be useful in the prevention of hepatic encephalopathy (58872). L-carnitine has also been evaluated in combination with rifaximin. A small clinical study in patients with overt hepatic encephalopathy shows that taking oral L-carnitine 1500 mg in combination with rifaximin 1200 mg three times daily for 12 weeks has no effect on the modified portal systemic encephalopathy index when compared with rifaximin alone. L-carnitine improved blood ammonia levels at 4 weeks, but not at 8 or 12 weeks (107410).
• Hepatitis-related fatigue. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with hepatitis-related fatigue. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with hepatitis C who are receiving interferon-alpha treatment shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams daily significantly reduces fatigue when compared with interferon-alpha alone. L-carnitine appears to reduce fatigue within the first 3 months of treatment, but not after 6 months (16104).
• Hepatitis B. Oral L-carnitine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with hepatitis B shows that taking a specific vitamin complex providing L-carnitine 2472 mg (Godex, Celltrion Pharm) in combination with entecavir 0.5 grams daily for 12 months normalizes alanine transaminase (ALT) levels in 95% and 100% of patients after 3 months and 12 months, respectively, compared to 59% and 86% of patients taking entecavir alone. However, the L-carnitine complex does not appear to improve aspartate transaminase (AST) levels or reduce hepatitis B virus titers (91724). It is unclear if these findings are due to L-carnitine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Hepatitis C. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may improve response to treatment and markers of liver function in patients with hepatitis C. Details: Two small clinical trials in patients with chronic hepatitis C show that taking L-carnitine 2 grams once or twice daily along with interferon-alpha and ribavirin for 12 months modestly improves response to treatment, increases hemoglobin and red blood cell counts, reduces aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, and reduces steatosis when compared with interferon-alpha and ribavirin treatment alone (58405,59010).
• HIV/AIDS. Although there has been interest in using intravenous L-carnitine to increase CD4 counts in patients with HIV/AIDS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial for reducing systolic or diastolic blood pressure. Details: A meta-analysis of low-quality clinical studies in adults, both healthy and with underlying health conditions,shows that taking oral L-carnitine 0.5 to 3 grams daily for 4 to 52 weeks does not reduce systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) when compared with control(115352). The validity of this study is limited by heterogenous methods between clinical trials, including population, dose, and outcome measurements.
• Hyperthyroidism. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with hyperthyroidism. Details: One small clinical trial in females with hyperthyroidism shows that taking L-carnitine 2-4 grams daily for 2-6 months seems to significantly improve symptoms associated with hyperthyroidism, such as palpitations, nervousness, tremors, and asthenia, when compared with placebo (8047).
• Hypertriglyceridemia. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Details: Small clinical studies in patients with hypertriglyceridemia show that taking L-carnitine 1 gram daily for 12 weeks does not reduce triglyceride levels when compared with placebo (59028,59244).
• Hypothyroidism. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial for improving fatigue in patients with hypothyroidism. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with secondary hypothyroidism shows that taking L-carnitine (Ildong Pharmaceutical Co.) 990 mg twice daily for 12 weeks in addition to adequate doses of levothyroxine does not reduce overall fatigue severity when compared with placebo. However, taking L-carnitine might improve physical and mental fatigue in patients with secondary hypothyroidism that are less than 50 years of age. L-carnitine might also improve mental fatigue in patients that underwent thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer (95069).
• Infertility. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial for female infertility. Details: One uncontrolled clinical trial in females who had failed to conceive in previous in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles shows that taking L-carnitine (L-CAR Basic Premium; AA Project Co. ltd.) 1000 mg daily for an average of 82 days does not improve the number of retrieved oocytes or fertilization rates when compared with previous IVF cycles. However, embryo quality at days 3 and 5 of insemination was improved, resulting in an increase in the rate of transferable embryos from 60% in previous cycles to 67%, morphologically good-quality embryos from around 46% to 54%, and blastocysts from around 11% to 21%. The most evidence of benefit was seen in those taking L-carnitine for the shortest time length of 7-44 days (96933).
• Intermittent claudication. Although there has been interest in using oral L-carnitine for intermittent claudication, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose.
• Liver disease. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may modestly improve some, but not all, lipid parameters in adults with liver disease. Details: A meta-analysis of six small, low-quality clinical trials in patients with hepatitis C, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) shows that taking L-carnitine moderately reduces total cholesterol and slightly reduces triglyceride levels, but does not improve low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, when compared with control. Studies evaluating L-carnitine doses of 2 grams daily or less and study durations of 24 months or longer showed the largest effect on lipid levels (104178). Another meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research in patients with hepatitis B or C, hepatic encephalopathy, NASH, or NAFLD shows that taking L-carnitine modestly reduces levels if aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (AST) when compared with taking placebo or no L-carnitine. Some of the studies included in this analysis used acetyl-L-carnitine. However, a meta-analysis of two studies investigating the effect of carnitine orotate shows that taking this compound increases the proportion of patients with normal ALT levels by 4.6 fold (111871).
• Liver transplant. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients awaiting a liver transplant. Details: One small clinical trial shows that taking L-carnitine 500 mg three times daily while awaiting a liver transplant does not reduce the incidence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) or non-function (PNF) when compared with placebo. However, survival one month after surgery was 97% in those taking L-carnitine, compared with 74% in those taking placebo (101562). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference in the incidences of PGD and PNF between groups.
• Low birth weight. It is unclear if oral or intravenous L-carnitine is effective for increasing body weight in preterm infants. Several small clinical studies show conflicting results. Details: Several very small clinical trials in preterm infants receiving total parenteral nutrition show that administering L-carnitine orally at a dose of 13-60 mcmol/kg or intravenously at a dose of 10 mg/kg or 50-100 mcmol/kg daily can improve fat utilization and weight gain when compared with control (3633,3634,3635,3636,3637,58902,59097). However, other small clinical studies show that supplementation with L-carnitine does not significantly increase body weight in preterm infants (58190,58800,59161). The reasons for the discrepant findings are unclear, but due to small study size, some of the studies may have been underpowered to detect significant differences between groups.
• Lyme disease. Although there has been interest in using oral L-carnitine for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose.
• Malnutrition. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in children with severe malnutrition. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study conducted in Bangladesh in children aged 9 to 24 months hospitalized with severe acute malnutrition shows that administering oral L-carnitine syrup 100 mg/kg daily for 15 days in addition to standard care does not improve rates of weight gain or reduce durations of hospital stays when compared with placebo (115351).
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral or intravenous L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with metabolic syndrome. Details: One very small clinical trial in patients with metabolic syndrome undergoing 2 days of moderate calorie restriction followed by a 5-day modified fasting period shows that intravenous L-carnitine 2 grams twice daily for 7 days increases weight loss by 1.4 kg and decreases waist circumference by 3.3 cm when compared with intravenous saline. Perceived hunger scores, physical fatigue, and insulin levels were also improved. However, there were no effects on blood pressure (90634). Other clinical research in patients with metabolic syndrome and a total carotid plaque volume of at least 50 mm³ shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams daily for 6 months does not affect the progression of carotid plaque volume when compared with taking placebo. Also, taking L-carnitine increased the progression of carotid plaque stenosis by 9.3%, as well as levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, in this population (111879).
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with migraine headaches. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with migraines shows that taking L-carnitine 500 mg daily, with or without magnesium oxide, for 12 weeks does not significantly reduce migraine frequency or severity when compared with a control (59030). However, another small preliminary clinical trial in children with episodic migraines shows that taking L-carnitine 25 mg per kg twice daily for 12 weeks prophylactically is as effective as taking propranolol 1 mg/kg once daily for reducing the frequency, severity, and duration of migraine headaches (111870). These studies were small and may have been underpowered to detect differences between groups.
• Muscle cramps. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with muscle cramps. Details: One small, uncontrolled clinical trial in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking L-carnitine 300 mg twice daily for 4 months decreases the monthly frequency of muscle cramps from around 4 cramps per month at baseline to around 1 cramp per month after treatment. When compared with baseline, pain was also reduced by about 1 point on a 5-point scale (96922). However, the lack of a placebo control group limits the validity of these findings.
• Multiple sclerosis-related fatigue. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with multiple sclerosis-related fatigue. Details: Some patients with multiple sclerosis have low blood levels of L-carnitine. Additionally, immunosuppressive therapy for multiple sclerosis can cause fatigue. One small, open-label clinical trial in patients with multiple sclerosis receiving immunosuppressive therapy and with low L-carnitine levels shows that taking L-carnitine 3-6 grams daily decreases some measures of fatigue when compared with no treatment (16107).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). It is unclear if oral or intravenous L-carnitine is beneficial in patients who have experienced an MI. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine orally or intravenously after MI reduces premature ventricular beats (58172,59044), improves myocardial viability (59248) and left ventricular function (3628), and reduces mortality (3627,3629,59037). However, other studies show no change in left ventricular functioning (58148) or mortality after taking L-carnitine (3628,58225,90630). The reasons for these discrepant findings are unclear, but may be due to differences in the dosing regimens and length of follow-up. Oral L-carnitine doses have ranged from 2-4 grams daily for up to 12 months (3627,3629,59248). Intravenous L-carnitine has been dosed at 5 grams within the first 36 hours after an MI followed by 3 grams twice daily on days 3-7 (58172), 100 mg/kg every 12 hours for 36 hours (59044), or 9 grams daily for 5 days followed by oral L-carnitine 6 grams daily for 12 months (3628).
• Narcolepsy. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with narcolepsy. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with narcolepsy shows that taking L-carnitine 340 mg in the morning and 170 mg in the evening for 8 weeks reduces dozing off time during the day by about 9 minutes when compared with placebo. However, the number of naps needed, quality of life, and sleepiness are not affected (90624).
• Neonatal apnea. It is unclear if intravenous L-carnitine is beneficial for preventing neonatal apnea in premature infants. Details: One small clinical trial in premature infants shows that adding L-carnitine 30 mg/kg daily to total parenteral nutrition or oral feeds does not affect ventilator requirements or reduce the incidence of apnea when compared with placebo (58163).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in children and adults with NAFLD. Details: One small clinical study in adults with NAFLD shows that taking L-carnitine 600 mg daily for 3 months improves markers of liver function when compared with baseline. No improvements in liver function markers were reported in patients in the control group; however, no statistical comparisons were conducted between groups (58808). A small clinical study in children aged 5-15 years with NAFLD receiving vitamin E shows that taking L-carnitine 25 mg/kg twice daily (maximum of 500 mg twice daily) for 3 months has no effect on aminotransferase concentrations or sonographic grades of fatty liver when compared with placebo (107401).
• Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with NASH. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with NASH shows that taking L-carnitine 1 gram after breakfast and 1 gram after dinner daily along with following a specific diet improves markers of liver function when compared with diet alone (58715). Another small clinical trial in patients with obesity and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis taking simvastatin 20 mg daily and following a hypocaloric diet shows that taking L-carnitine 10 mL twice daily for 90 days modestly reduces BMI, and improves liver health, lipid, and glycemic indices, when compared with taking a product described as essential phospholipids (111893).
• Obesity. Oral L-carnitine seems to have a small effect on weight loss in overweight or obese individuals when taken for up to 6 months, but some conflicting results exist. Doses of 2 grams daily seem to offer the most benefit. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical trials show that taking L-carnitine 250 mg to 4 grams daily reduces weight and body mass index (BMI) by a small amount when compared with a control group not taking L-carnitine (95074,101563,101564). Subgroup analyses show that L-carnitine only reduces BMI and weight in overweight or obese patients. Taking L-carnitine did not affect weight or BMI in patients with a BMI of up to 25 kg/m2 or in patients undergoing hemodialysis (101563,101564). Another subgroup analysis shows that the largest benefit occurs at a dose of 2 grams daily (101564). In patients with obesity and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis taking simvastatin 20 mg daily and following a hypocaloric diet, one clinical trial shows that taking L-carnitine 10 mL twice daily for 90 days modestly reduces BMI, and improves liver health, lipid, and glycemic indices, when compared with taking a product described as essential phospholipids (111893). However, conflicting results exist. One subgroup analysis in overweight or obese individuals shows that there is no effect on BMI when L-carnitine is taken for 24 weeks or more (101563). One meta-analysis of two small clinical trials in patients with overweight or obesity shows that taking L-carnitine is no more effective than lifestyle modification for reducing body weight (111866). Also, some clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine does not reduce body weight in obese females. Doses used in these studies include L-carnitine 1 gram daily for 12 weeks or 2 grams twice daily for 8 weeks along with exercise (58151,111872). The effect of L-carnitine on cardiovascular risk has also been examined in patients with obesity. One small clinical trial shows that taking L-carnitine 1 gram daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces the lipid accumulation index, based on waist circumference and blood triglyceride levels, when compared with taking placebo. However, there was no effect on other cardiovascular risk indices based on ratios of triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and/or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels (111872). L-carnitine has also been evaluated in combination with weight loss medications. Clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams daily along with orlistat 360 mg daily or sibutramine 10 mg daily for 1 year decreases body weight and BMI when compared with orlistat or sibutramine alone in obese adults with type 2 diabetes (58778,58830,58882).
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Details: A small clinical study in females with knee osteoarthritis and overweight or obesity who are on a low-calorie diet shows that taking L-carnitine 1 gram daily for 12 weeks does not improve pain, stiffness, or physical function when compared with placebo (107403).
• Pemphigus. Although there has been interest in using oral L-carnitine for glucocorticoid-induced muscle wasting in patients with pemphigus, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose.
• Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with PAD. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with PAD shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams twice daily for 3 weeks may improve walking distances in people with PAD (3631). However, another small clinical trial in patients with PAD or coronary heart disease shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams two hours before exercise does not improve endurance (58196). Also, adding L-carnitine 1 gram twice daily to cilostazol therapy for 180 days does not appear to confer additional benefit in this patient population (59023).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial for improving pregnancy rates or cardiovascular risk in people with PCOS. The effect of L-carnitine on body composition has promising results. Details: Clinical research shows that adding L-carnitine 3 grams daily for 3 months to standard clomiphene plus metformin therapy improves menstrual regularity by 20%, ovulation rate by 24%, and pregnancy rate by 21% when compared with placebo (102123). Preliminary clinical research in patients with PCOS who are resistant to both clomiphene and human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams twice daily from day 3 of clomiphene treatment until HCG injection results in the presence of a dominant follicle in 64% of cycles and pregnancy in 20% of cycles (96936). However, L-carnitine may not be beneficial in combination with assisted reproductive technology (ART), including in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Two small clinical studies in patients with PCOS receiving ART in combination with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol shows that adding L-carnitine 3000 mg daily starting on the second day of menstruation and continuing until the day of oocyte triggering or embryo transfer does not improve rates of oocyte maturity or retrieval, implantation, or pregnancy when compared with control (107409,115353). The effect of L-carnitine has also been examined on anthropometric and cardiovascular risk indices in patients with PCOS. One small clinical study shows that taking L-carnitine 250 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces body weight by 2.8 kg, body mass index (BMI) by 1.2 kg/m2, waist circumference by 1.7 cm, and hip circumference by 2.2 cm when compared with placebo (96935). A meta-analysis of this and other small studies also shows that L-carnitine modestly reduces BMI when compared with placebo in patients with PCOS (111873). Although several studies also show improvements in markers of glycemic control and insulin sensitivity, most research does not support beneficial effects on lipid levels, cardiovascular risk, or liver fat content (96935,107402,107404,115353).
• Rett syndrome. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with Rett syndrome. Details: Two small clinical studies in children with Rett syndrome show that taking L-carnitine 100 mg/kg daily in two or three divided doses for up to 6 months modestly improves well-being, motor skills, sleep efficiency, and communication skills when compared with control or placebo (1433,58161).
• Sarcopenia. Oral L-carnitine may be beneficial for preventing sarcopenia in adults over 75 years of age, but not in healthy older females. Details: One small clinical trial in healthy, active, older females aged 65-70 years shows that taking L-carnitine, as L-carnitine-l-tartrate 1500 mg, daily for 24 weeks does not improve muscle strength or muscle mass when compared with placebo (96930). An additional preliminary clinical trial in females aged 60-75 years taking part in a twice weekly resistance exercise program shows that taking L-carnitine tartrate 1 gram daily with L-leucine 3 grams daily for 24 weeks does not improve muscle strength or volume when compared with taking L-leucine 4 grams daily or no supplementation (111880). These studies were small and may have been underpowered to detect differences. In contrast, in weaker adults 75 years of age and older, taking L-carnitine 2-4 grams daily for 1-6 months increases muscle mass by approximately 2-4 kg when compared with placebo (16109,16111).
• Sepsis. Small clinical studies suggest that intravenous L-carnitine may not reduce mortality in patients with sepsis, although patients with more severe sepsis may see some benefit. Details: Meta-analyses of generally low-quality small clinical trials in patients with sepsis shows that intravenous administration of L-carnitine, 2-6 grams as a bolus followed by a 4-12 gram infusion, does not reduce the risk of 28-day or 1-year mortality when compared with placebo (104180,111868). However, in a subgroup analysis of patients with more severe sepsis, classified as those with a sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA) of greater than 12, the risk of 1-year mortality was reduced by 32% when compared with placebo (104180).
• Spinal muscular atrophy. Although there has been interest in using oral L-carnitine for spinal muscular atrophy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose.
• Theophylline-induced cardiac toxicity. It is unclear if intravenous L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with theophylline-induced cardiac toxicity. Details: One small clinical trial shows that intravenous administration of L-carnitine 100 mg/kg over 30-60 minutes followed by 50 mg/kg every 8 hours along with intravenous propranolol within 24 hours of theophylline intoxication improves symptoms associated with theophylline-induced cardiac toxicity when given along with standard treatment. This combination led to greater improvements than either agent used alone. These included improvements in serum theophylline levels, heart rate, arrhythmia, mean arterial pressure, and duration of hospital stay. When L-carnitine was used without propranolol, only respiratory rate and theophylline levels over 24 hours were improved to a greater extent than with standard treatment alone (101566).
• Toxin-induced liver damage. Small clinical studies have evaluated oral and intravenous L-carnitine for the management of liver damage caused by different classes of drugs, including antimycobacterial antibiotics and asparaginase-based agents, with promising results. Details: The antimycobacterial antibiotics used to treat tuberculosis, including isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide, have been associated with hepatotoxicity (90922). Clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams in two divided doses daily for 4 weeks along with a standard treatment regimen for tuberculosis reduces the percentage of treatment-naïve patients with drug-induced hepatotoxicity by almost half when compared with placebo (26499). The asparaginase-based medications have also been associated with hepatotoxicity. Two case series of children with hyperbilirubinemia caused by treatment with L-asparaginase or pegaspargase show that administering intravenous L-carnitine 50-100 mg/kg daily improves bilirubin levels (100353,100354). One case series also suggests that taking oral L-carnitine 50-100 mg/kg daily can help to prevent hyperbilirubinemia in patients with a history of asparaginase-induced hepatotoxicity (100353).
• Traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although there has been interest in using oral L-carnitine for TBI, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose.
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in children with UTIs. Details: One small clinical trial in children 6 months to 10 years of age shows that taking L-carnitine 50 mg/kg daily as a syrup along with antibiotics for 7 days prevents renal scarring associated with acute pyelonephritis. Kidney damage was resolved in 50% of children taking L-carnitine, compared with 13% of children taking placebo. There were no differences in urine cultures between groups (101568).
• Venous leg ulcers. Although there has been interest in using oral L-carnitine for venous leg ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate L-carnitine for these uses.

(Read more about L-CARNITINE)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Small studies show that taking a single oral dose of L-citrulline before anaerobic resistance exercise might reduce exhaustion and improve some performance measures. It is unclear if L-citrulline improves aerobic exercise performance; results are conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical trials in healthy trained and untrained adults shows that taking L-citrulline prior to mostly anaerobic exercise marginally reduces perceived exhaustion and muscle soreness when compared with placebo (105965). Another meta-analysis including some of the same clinical studies shows that taking L-citrulline malate before exercise modestly increases performance on resistance exercises by an average of 6% when compared with placebo (105968). Individual studies show mixed benefit and mostly use a single dose of L-citrulline malate 8 grams 1 hour before exercise; other studies used L-citrulline 3.3-6 grams mixed in watermelon juice or sucrose water or L-citrulline malate 12 grams given 1-2 hours before exercise (94966,94957,97395,105965). L-citrulline has also been evaluated for use with aerobic exercise. A small study in healthy young adults taking L-citrulline 9 grams in 3 divided doses over 24 hours or as a single dose of 3 grams 3 hours before a treadmill test does not improve performance, but might reduce time to exhaustion, when compared with placebo (16473). Another small clinical study in healthy adults shows that taking about 6.8 grams (100 mg/kg) of L-citrulline daily for 5 days prior to a cycling trial does not improve time to exhaustion, oxygen uptake, or lactate levels when compared with taking 3 grams of glucose as placebo (105964). However, two small clinical trials in healthy males show that taking L-citrulline 2.4-6 grams daily for 7 days prior to a cycling test improves peak power by 9%, total work by 7%, and cycling time trial performance by 1.5% when compared with placebo (94954,94965). Differences in methods of testing athletic performance, the form and dose of L-citrulline used, and/or the duration of supplementation may explain the mixed results. L-citrulline has also been evaluated in combination with L-arginine. Research in male soccer players shows that taking L-citrulline 1.2 grams and L-arginine 1.2 grams daily for 7 days increases total power output over a 10-minute cycling test and improves subjective perceptions of exertion when compared with placebo (100956).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Sarcopenia. Oral L-citrulline does not seem beneficial for muscle strength in older adults when added to structured exercise. Details: Two small clinical studies in older adults show that taking L-citrulline in conjunction with structured exercise does not improve measures of strength, endurance, speed, or balance when compared with placebo and structured exercise (110146,110148). One study evaluated otherwise healthy adults aged 60-73 years taking L-citrulline 3 grams daily for 6 weeks (110146). The other study evaluated older adults with obesity and an average age of 68.5 years taking a specific L-citrulline product (Citrage) 10 grams daily for 12 weeks (110148).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although there is interest in using oral L-citrulline for CVD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-citrulline for this condition.
• Dementia. Although there is interest in using oral L-citrulline for dementia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-citrulline for this condition.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral L-citrulline is beneficial in patients with diabetes. Details: A small clinical study in adults with diabetes who are taking metformin and sulfonylureas shows that adding L-citrulline (Bulk Supplements Co., Ltd.) 3 grams daily before breakfast for 8 weeks reduces average fasting blood glucose levels by 22 mg/dL and glycated hemoglobin by 0.7%, but does not affect lipid levels, when compared with taking a microcrystalline cellulose placebo (105963).
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). It is unclear if oral L-citrulline is beneficial in patients with ED. Details: A small non-randomized crossover study in adults with mild ED shows that taking L-citrulline 1.5 grams daily for one month improves erection hardness from "mild dysfunction" to "normal function" in 50% of patients, compared with only 8% of patients taking placebo (94956). L-citrulline has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A clinical study in middle-aged males with ED shows that taking a specific combination product (Revactin, MD Concepts LLC) containing L-citrulline, muira puama, ginger root, and guarana twice daily for 3 months improves scores related to erectile function and intercourse satisfaction, but does not improve sexual desire or orgasmic function scores, when compared to baseline (103224). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a placebo control, the use of per-protocol analysis, and a high dropout rate. In fact, 44% of patients withdrew in order to resume use of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors. Another small clinical study in adults with ED living in Japan and using PDE5 inhibitors as needed shows that taking an adjunct 50 mL drink containing L-citrulline 800 mg, a specific fenugreek extract (Testofen) 600 mg, resveratrol 300 mg, and caffeine 40 mg daily for 14 days modestly improves erectile function and satisfaction with intercourse and orgasm when compared with a placebo drink (105966). The validity of this finding may be confounded by the "as needed" use of PDE5 inhibitors, which was not reported throughout the study. Further, in both combination studies, it is unclear if these effects are due to L-citrulline, other supplement ingredients, or the combination.
• Heart failure. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-citrulline might be beneficial in patients with heart failure. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) shows that taking L-citrulline malate 3 grams daily for 2 months decreases systolic pulmonary arterial pressure by 16% and improves the right ventricular ejection fraction after a stress test by 27% when compared to baseline (94962). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group. Another small open-label clinical study in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) shows that taking L-citrulline 3 grams daily for 4 months increases left ventricular ejection fraction by about 20% at rest and 13% during the stress test, and increases the right ventricular ejection fraction by about 15%, both at rest and with the stress test, when compared with no supplementation. This improved the heart failure functional class in 35% of patients (94955).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral L-citrulline is beneficial for lowering blood pressure. Details: A small clinical trial in adults with prehypertension shows that taking L-citrulline 2 grams with grape and cranberry polyphenols 548 mg daily for 6 weeks does not reduce mean ambulatory blood pressure when compared with a cellulose placebo (105969). A small crossover study in postmenopausal females with hypertension shows that taking L-citrulline 6 grams as a single dose does not improve systolic or diastolic blood pressure at rest or during 5 minutes of plantar flexion exercise when compared with placebo (110147). The effects of using L-citrulline regularly or in other patients with diagnosed hypertension is unclear.
• Lysinuric protein intolerance. Although there is interest in using oral L-citrulline for lysinuric protein intolerance, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-citrulline for this condition.
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral L-citrulline can improve muscle strength when used in conjunction with resistance training. Details: A clinical study in healthy resistance-trained adults shows that taking L-citrulline malate 2 grams daily for 8 weeks in conjunction with resistance training does not further increase lean mass or muscle strength, measured by leg and bench presses, when compared with a cellulose placebo and resistance training (97394).
• Muscular dystrophy. It is unclear if oral L-citrulline is beneficial in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Details: A small clinical study in adults with Becker muscular dystrophy, a milder form of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), shows that taking L-citrulline 5 grams with or without metformin 500 mg three times daily for 6 weeks improves 6-minute walking distance and decreases markers of muscle necrosis when compared to baseline (100975). A small clinical study in males aged 6.5-10 years with DMD shows that taking L-citrulline 2.5 grams with metformin 250 mg three times daily for 26 weeks does not appear to slow decline in motor function when compared with placebo. However, this combination seems to slow decline in children with more stable disease, defined as those who can walk at least 350 meters in 6 minutes (100976). The reasons for these disparate results are unclear, but they may be due to the different patient populations, disease severities, doses, and durations of therapy being studied.
• Postoperative pulmonary hypertension. It is unclear if oral citrulline prevents postoperative hypertension in children undergoing heart surgery. Details: A small clinical study in children 6 years of age and younger undergoing congenital heart surgery shows that higher blood levels of L-citrulline might protect against the incidence of postoperative hypertension. L-citrulline blood levels of at least 37 micromol/L immediately after surgery, and at 12, 24, and 36 hours postoperatively, protects against its development. However, supplementation with 1.9 grams/m2 during induction of anesthesia is not necessarily protective (16467).
• Post-polio syndrome. It is unclear if oral L-citrulline is beneficial for patients with this condition. Details: A small clinical study in adults with post-polio syndrome shows that taking L-citrulline 5 grams three times daily for 24 weeks does not improve 6-minute walking distance, motor function scores, muscle strength, or quality of life when compared with placebo (110149).
• Pulmonary hypertension. It is unclear if oral L-citrulline is beneficial in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with idiopathic arterial pulmonary hypertension or pulmonary hypertension due to Eisenmenger syndrome shows that taking L-citrulline malate 1 gram three times daily for 2 weeks increases 6-minute walking distance by 44 meters and reduces mean pulmonary arterial pressure by 5% when compared with baseline (94963). The validity of these findings is limited by the small study size and the lack of a comparator group.
• Reye syndrome. Although there is interest in using oral L-citrulline for Reye syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-citrulline for this condition.
• Sickle cell disease. It is unclear if oral L-citrulline is beneficial in patients with sickle cell disease. Details: A small clinical study in children ages 10-18 years shows that taking L-citrulline 90-130 mg/kg daily in 2 divided doses for up to 9 months might reduce neutrophilia and other symptoms when compared with baseline (16463). The validity of these findings is limited by the small study size and the lack of a comparator group. More evidence is needed to rate L-citrulline for these uses.

(Read more about L-CITRULLINE)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Celiac disease. Although there has been interest in using oral lipase for celiac disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lipase for this purpose.
• Dyspepsia. It is unclear if oral lipase is beneficial for improving symptoms of postprandial distress syndrome. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking a specific acid-resistant lipase (Amano Enzyme USA) 280 mg immediately before a high-fat meal does not reduce postprandial bloating and nausea when compared with placebo in individuals with postprandial distress syndrome (101900).
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although there has been interest in using oral lipase for IBD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lipase for this purpose.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if adding a specific form of lipase, recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase (rhBSSL), to infant formula improves outcomes in premature infants. Some research suggests a potential increased risk for adverse effects. Details: Human breast milk contains rhBSSL, but it is inactivated when breast milk is pasteurized for donation. Clinical research in infants born before 32 weeks' gestation shows that adding rhBSSL as 8700 units per 100 mL formula or pasteurized breast milk, for 4 weeks does not increase growth velocity, body length, or head circumference over the next 12 months when compared with formula or pasteurized breast milk devoid of lipase. However, the infants who were small for gestational age (SGA), which made up approximately 15% of the study population, grew by an additional 1.9 grams/kg daily on average when compared with placebo (101940). More evidence is needed to rate lipase for these uses.

(Read more about LIPASE)

Proteolytic enzymes represent a wide group of enzymes that are used alone or in combination. See specific monographs for effectiveness information.

(Read more about PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES))

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Cystic fibrosis. Long-term nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride improves lung function and reduces pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis show that, when taken along with a bronchodilator and other standard therapies, nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride in concentrations of 3% to 7%, up to 10 mL twice daily for 4 weeks, increases forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) when compared with isotonic saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) (26230,26230). This benefit was not seen at 48 weeks. Other clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis shows that inhaling sodium chloride 7%, 4 mL twice daily for 48 weeks, does not improve FEV1 when compared with isotonic saline. However, chronic treatment with hypertonic saline does reduce the number of pulmonary exacerbations and increase the number of patients without pulmonary exacerbations when compared with isotonic saline (29402). It is not clear if this benefit occurs in children with cystic fibrosis. The Pulmonary Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends that individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 6 years or older use nebulized hypertonic saline long-term to improve lung function, reduce the number of exacerbations, and improve quality of life (29403).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity. Oral sodium chloride seems to prevent nephrotoxicity associated with use of amphotericin B. Details: Clinical research shows that administering oral or intravenous sodium chloride 150 mEq daily during treatment with amphotericin B can attenuate the rise in serum creatinine levels and preserve renal function when compared to treatment with amphotericin B alone (26226).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in preventing lithium level fluctuations in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A moderate-sized open-label clinical study in adults with type I bipolar disorder receiving lithium carbonate shows that taking sodium chloride 1 gram daily for 12 weeks along with dietary salt restriction of 1 gram daily reduces the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L, but does not significantly affect serum sodium, potassium, aldosterone, or creatinine levels when compared with controls who were not salt restricted, but were advised not to consume additional salt at the table (112909). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by missing data in both groups.
• Canker sores. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for canker sores, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Congestive heart failure. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in patients with acute decompensated heart failure requiring decongestive therapy with diuretics. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure requiring high-dose intravenous furosemide shows that taking sodium chloride 2 grams three times daily for up to 96 hours does not affect patient weight or serum creatinine levels when compared with placebo (112911). However, the clinical relevance of this study is unclear and it may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Conjunctivitis. Although there is interest in using ophthalmic sodium chloride for conjunctivitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Hyponatremia. Although there is interest in using oral sodium chloride for hyponatremia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral sodium chloride for this condition.
• Pharyngitis. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for pharyngitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial for premature infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in infants born at less than 32 weeks' gestation shows that adding sodium 4 mEq/kg daily to enteral feedings, starting from the 7th day after birth and continuing through the 35th day, reduces the risk of developing hyponatremia and improves weight gain when compared with adding water (98180). A small, open-label clinical study in newborns less than 35 weeks gestation shows that high sodium intake, defined as an average of 0.25% sodium in maintenance fluids, for 48 hours on day 2 and 3 after birth results in less weight loss within the first 72 hours of life when compared with control, but does not improve mortality, length of hospital stay, or complications from prematurity (112908). However, interpretation of these findings is limited by varied concentrations of sodium as an intervention. More evidence is needed to rate sodium for these uses.

(Read more about SODIUM)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Congestive heart failure (CHF). Oral taurine may improve left ventricular function, heart failure-related symptoms, and exercise capacity in patients with CHF. Details: Taking taurine 2-6 grams in two or three divided doses daily for 6-8 weeks seems to improve left ventricular function (5248,5271,8221) and symptoms of heart failure (5271,5306,8221) when compared with placebo or coenzyme Q10 in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II to IV. Also, taking taurine 500 mg three times daily for 2 weeks seems to improve exercise capacity when compared with placebo in patients with heart failure (77176). Some patients with severe heart failure rapidly improve from NYHA class IV to II after 4-8 weeks of treatment. Improvement seems to continue for as long as taurine treatment is continued, up to one year (5306,8217,8218,8221).
• Hepatitis. Oral taurine may improve liver function in patients with acute or chronic hepatitis. Details: Several small clinical trials show that taking taurine 1.5-4 grams daily for up to 3 months improves liver function in patients with acute and chronic hepatitis when compared with placebo (10454,77114,77147).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Obesity. Oral taurine does not appear to improve body weight in adults who are obese or overweight. Details: A meta-analysis of 12 small clinical trials shows that taurine supplementation does not reduce body weight or body mass index (BMI) when compared with placebo. The studies included in this analysis evaluated taurine doses of 0.5-6 grams daily for 15 days to 6 months. Most of the patient populations evaluated in the included studies had liver or metabolic disorders; three studies specifically evaluated overweight or obese adults (104166). Additionally, a more recent clinical trial in a small group of females with obesity shows that taking taurine 1 gram three times daily along with a calorie-restricted diet for 8 weeks does not reduce body weight, BMI, or waist circumference when compared with calorie restriction alone (104167). In contrast, a very small study in adults with type 2 diabetes on antidiabetes medication shows that taking taurine 500 mg twice daily for 8 weeks reduces body mass, BMI, and body fat percentage when compared with control (112271). The validity of these effects is limited by the small sample size.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Academic performance. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial to improve academic performance. Details: A very small clinical study in college entrance examinees over age 19 shows that taking a jelly containing taurine 3 grams daily for 14 days does not improve academic achievement when compared with baseline or placebo (110579). Due to its small size, this study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Although there has been interest in using oral taurine for AMD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of taurine for this purpose.
• Androgenic alopecia. Oral taurine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with androgenic alopecia or telogen effluvium shows that taking a combination product containing taurine, cysteine, methionine, iron, selenium, and hydrolyzed collagen (GFM Oral, Cantabria Labs) along with conventional therapy, consisting primarily of finasteride or minoxidil, daily for 12 weeks improves hair loss when compared with conventional therapy alone (111636). It is unclear if this effect is due to taurine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Athletic performance. Research on the use of taurine for improving endurance or power output is limited and conflicting; however, it may improve performance by a small amount in some athletes. Details: Research is conflicting on the effects of taurine on athletic performance. Several clinical studies in trained and untrained athletes show that taking taurine 1-6 grams as a single dose before endurance exercise, or 3 grams daily for 8 weeks after endurance exercise, does not improve endurance or aerobic capacity when compared with placebo (77159,77203,95613,98334). However, a meta-analysis of 7 small clinical trials shows that taking taurine 1-6 grams daily for up to 2 weeks slightly improves endurance when compared with control. Also, preliminary studies in male cyclists, recreationally active males, Olympic-level athletes, and female athletes habituated to caffeine show that taking taurine 50 mg/kg or 1-6 grams one time 1.5-2 hours prior to a cycling test increases the time to exhaustion and peak, mean, and minimum power output but does not improve perceived exertion, fatigue index, heart rate, or anaerobic capacity when compared with placebo (101475,103211,112265,112269). The reasons for these discrepancies are unclear; the meta-analysis did not identify a dose or duration-related benefit. One small clinical trial shows that taking taurine 40 mg/kg improves muscle power in caffeine-deprived athletes who regularly use caffeine, but actually seems to worsen muscle power in athletes who do not regularly use caffeine (98335). Overall, it is not clear which population is most likely to benefit from taurine use (98337,98338). Study results are mixed when taurine has been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. One small study shows that taking a specific product containing taurine and caffeine (AdvoCare Spark) does not improve sprint performance in college athletes when compared with placebo (77195). However, other small studies of cyclists and boxers suggest that taking taurine in combination with a variety of other ingredients including B vitamins, caffeine, and glucuronolactone (Red Bull Energy Drink) or ginseng, kudzu, and soybean, may improve measures such as endurance, power, balance, or agility (37815,57945,110577,112269). It is unclear if the benefits seen in these studies are due to taurine, other ingredients, or the combinations.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although there has been interest in using oral taurine for ADHD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of taurine for this purpose.
• Autism spectrum disorder. Although there has been interest in using oral taurine for autism spectrum disorder, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of taurine for this purpose.
• Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with CINV. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving 6 months of chemotherapy shows that taking taurine (pure powder, Aviforme) 1000 mg twice daily, starting 6 hours after receiving chemotherapeutic agents, significantly improves CINV in 87.5% of patients. Other symptoms, such as reduced appetite and smell and taste impairment, are also improved in some patients (91512).
• Chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial for preventing or treating chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving 6 months of chemotherapy shows that taking taurine (pure powder, Aviforme) 1000 mg twice daily reduces plasma creatinine, urea, bilirubin, and liver enzymes after 4 months when compared with placebo. This suggests a protective effect against chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity. A reduction in overall fatigue is also observed (95616).
• Cirrhosis. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with cirrhosis. Details: One small, uncontrolled clinical study in patients with cirrhosis shows that taking taurine 1 gram three times daily for 4 weeks reduces the severity and frequency of muscle cramps when compared to baseline (104165). Another small clinical trial in patients with cirrhosis shows that taking taurine 6 grams daily for 4 weeks reduces portal hypertension by 12%, compared with a 2% increase in the placebo group (98336). However, it is unclear if this is associated with a reduced risk for complications such as variceal bleeding and ascites.
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial for improving cognitive function; however, taking an energy drink (Red Bull Energy Drink) containing taurine and other ingredients may modestly improve some measures of cognitive function. Details: Levels of taurine decrease with age, but supplementation does not seem to have neuroprotective effects or cognitive benefits in the elderly (101471,110574,110578). In one small crossover study, taurine alone did not reduce errors in sleep-deprived individuals when compared with placebo (38154). However, taurine taken as part of an energy drink formulation containing taurine, caffeine, glucuronolactone, and B vitamins (Red Bull Energy Drink) improves focused and sustained attention, wakefulness, verbal reasoning, driving ability and quality, and reaction speed when compared with placebo (9899,38117,77088,77202). Preliminary clinical research in young adults also shows that consuming the Red Bull Energy Drink might improve attention and verbal reasoning, but does not seem to improve memory, when compared with placebo (9899,77088).
• Cystic fibrosis. Oral taurine may reduce steatorrhea in children with cystic fibrosis, but it does not seem to improve other measures of nutritional status. Details: Some small clinical studies in children with cystic fibrosis show that taking taurine 30-40 mg/kg daily for 7 days to 6 months might be useful as adjunctive therapy to reduce steatorrhea when compared with baseline or placebo (10455,77227,77231). However, it does not seem to improve growth, lung function, muscle protein breakdown, or other symptoms of cystic fibrosis (77224,77228). Also, adding taurine 500-1500 mg daily to treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid for up to one year does not improve liver function tests, fat absorption, or nutritional status in patients with cystic fibrosis and associated liver disease when compared with ursodeoxycholic acid alone (77246,77256).
• Delirium. It is unclear if oral taurine prevents delirium in patients in the intensive care unit. Details: A large clinical study of hospitalized adults in Iran who underwent liver transplantation shows that taking a specific taurine powder product (100% Taurine Amino Acid, MyProtein) 2 grams daily for 30 days post-transplant reduces the risk of delirium by 73% when compared with placebo. These results also suggest that for every four patients treated with taurine over placebo, one additional case of delirium is prevented. Patients who took taurine also had less time on the ventilator and shorter intensive care and hospital stays (110575). However, it is unclear if these effects are due to taurine or other factors since ventilator time and intensive care length of stay are risk factors for delirium.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with diabetes. Details: Plasma levels of taurine are reported to be lower in patients with diabetes than in healthy controls (101473). However, clinical research evaluating taurine for glycemic control is mixed (77074,103212). One small clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking taurine 1 gram three times daily for 8 weeks reduces blood glucose, insulin resistance, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when compared with placebo (103212). Although there was no improvement in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), the study was not long enough to detect a meaningful reduction in HbA1c. Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking taurine 1-1.5 grams twice daily for 2-4 months does not affect fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, or insulin but may improve measures of insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes when compared with placebo (77074,112271). However, taking taurine while following an exercise program 3 times weekly does appear to reduce fasting blood sugar and HbA1c when compared with exercise plus placebo (112271). The reasons for these discrepant findings are unclear; however, all the included studies were small and potentially inadequately powered to detect a difference in outcomes.
• Epilepsy. Although there has been interest in using oral taurine for epilepsy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of taurine for this condition.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Small clinical studies suggest that oral taurine may modestly improve exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: One small clinical trial in healthy, untrained adults shows that taking taurine 2 grams in combination with branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) three times daily for 2 weeks reduces subjective muscle soreness by 37% when compared with placebo (77212). Another small clinical trial in young, untrained males shows that taking taurine (Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., LTD.) 2 grams three times daily after meals before exercise, and continuing for three days after exercise, reduces delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), but not creatine kinase levels, when compared with placebo (91513).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial for improving fatigue. Details: One small clinical trial shows that taurine seems to reduce fatigue when taken alone, but increases fatigue when taken in combination with caffeine (77202). However, an observational study in young adults has found that subjective scores for physical and mental fatigue do not seem to correlate with dietary taurine intake (101472). One small clinical trial shows that drinking 500 mL of an energy drink providing taurine 1 gram plus other ingredients including caffeine and B vitamins decreases measures of driving-related fatigue in a driving simulation when compared with placebo (91075).
• Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if oral taurine can aid in the eradication of helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Details: One clinical trial shows that taking taurine 500 mg twice daily in combination with conventional treatment for 6 weeks increases H. pylori eradication and shortens duodenal ulcer scarring time in patients with confirmed H. pylori infection when compared with conventional treatment alone (77145).
• Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial for lowering lipid levels. Details: A meta-analysis of 12 small clinical trials in adults with various liver or metabolic disorders, but without a specific diagnosis of hyperlipidemia, shows that taurine supplementation reduces total cholesterol by 11 mg/dL and triglycerides by 13 mg/dL, but does not seem to improve low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. The studies included in this analysis evaluated doses of 0.5-6 grams daily for 15 days to 6 months (104166). The benefits of taurine in adults with hyperlipidemia are unclear. The effect of taurine has also been investigated in combination with exercise. A very small study in adults with type 2 diabetes on antidiabetes medication shows that taking taurine 500 mg twice daily while participating in an exercise program 3 times weekly for 8 weeks reduces triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol and increases HDL cholesterol when compared with exercise plus placebo (112271).
• Hypertension. Oral taurine may modestly reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension; however, the long-term antihypertensive effects of taurine are unclear. Details: One clinical study in patients with elevated blood pressure or stage 1 hypertension shows that taking taurine 1.6 grams daily for 12 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 5 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 3 mmHg when compared with placebo. The benefit is seen after 8 weeks of continued supplementation (95614). A small clinical trial in patients with stage 2 hypertension (previously classified as borderline hypertension) shows that taking taurine 6 grams daily for 7 days reduces both SBP and DBP when compared to baseline (77229). The long-term effects of taurine on blood pressure are unclear. A meta-analysis of 12 small clinical trials in adults with various liver or metabolic disorders, but without a specific hypertension diagnosis, shows that taurine supplementation reduces SBP by 5 mmHg and DBP by 3 mmHg when compared with placebo. The studies included in this analysis evaluated doses of 0.5-6 grams daily for 15 days to 6 months (104166). Taurine is commonly found in energy drinks, and its effect on blood pressure when used in combination with other ingredients in the form of an energy drink has been evaluated. A small observational study in young adults suggests that drinking a specific combination product containing taurine 100 mg, caffeine, and group B vitamins (Redbull Energy Drink) reduces heart rate but does not change SBP or DBP when compared to baseline (112266). However, another small observational study in young healthy adults suggests that drinking a specific combination product containing taurine 2000 mg, caffeine, ginseng, glucuronolactone, inositol, guarana, L-carnitine, and B vitamins (Monster Energy Drink) increases both SBP and DBP by about 16 mmHg and raises heart rate by 17 beats per minute 15 minutes after consumption when compared to baseline. However, 90 minutes after consumption only DBP and heart rate remain elevated (112268). In both studies, the validity of the effects is limited by a lack of a comparator group. Additionally, it is unclear if the effects are due to taurine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Infant development. Higher maternal intake of taurine from the diet may be linked to increased newborn length and weight; however, feeding taurine-containing formula to newborns does not appear to improve infant development. Details: One observational study has found a positive correlation between maternal dietary taurine intake and newborn length. In pregnant patients with high taurine intake (>120 mg/day), neonatal birth weight and length were significantly higher when compared with groups with lower taurine intake (101474). However, clinical research shows that administering infant formula containing taurine 45 mg/L for up to 12 weeks does not affect weight, length, head circumference, or behavior in preterm and full-term infants when compared with formula without taurine (77119,77216,77218,77239,77260).
• Iron deficiency anemia. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with iron deficiency anemia. Details: One small clinical trial in females with iron deficiency anemia shows that taking taurine 1000 mg plus ferrous sulfate 325 mg daily for 20 weeks improves hemoglobin concentrations, red blood cell counts, and serum ferritin levels when compared with ferrous sulfate plus placebo (77070).
• Muscular dystrophy. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with muscular dystrophy. Details: One very small crossover trial in patients with muscular dystrophy shows that taking taurine 100-150 mg/kg for 6 months improves the ability to relax muscles after voluntary use when compared with placebo (77235).
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral taurine improves physical performance in older adults. Details: A small study in elderly females living in a care facility shows that taking taurine powder 1.5 grams daily for 14 weeks in addition to standardized exercise training may modestly improve some measures of physical fitness (i.e. agility, endurance) when compared to baseline. These measures were not improved in patients who took taurine but did not participate in exercise training or who participated in exercise training but did not take taurine (110574). The validity of these findings is limited by lack of randomization, blinding, and statistical comparison between groups.
• Postoperative recovery. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial for improving postoperative recovery. Details: One small clinical trial in patients recovering from surgery after a hip fracture shows that taking taurine 6 grams daily for 7 days after surgery does not improve morbidity and mortality outcomes after 1 year when compared with placebo (95615).
• Psychosis. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with psychosis. Details: One small clinical trial in adults up to 25 years of age with first-episode psychosis shows that taking taurine 4 grams daily for 12 weeks in combination with prescribed antipsychotics reduces positive psychotic symptoms, but not negative or cognitive symptoms, when compared with placebo (95612).
• Sleep deprivation. Oral taurine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a combination product containing taurine, caffeine, glucuronolactone, and B vitamins (Red Bull Energy Drink) reduces lane drifting and sleepiness and improves driving quality and reaction time during a car-driving simulator exercise in sleep-deprived individuals when compared with placebo (38117,77066). Other preliminary clinical research in sleep-deprived surgical trainees shows that taking taurine 2 grams in addition to caffeine 150 mg improves reaction time during performance of simulated laparoscopic surgery when compared with placebo, although error-making is not reduced (38154).
• Tourette syndrome. Oral taurine may improve tic severity in children with Tourette syndrome who are taking tiapride at a dose of 300 mg or less. Taurine may not be effective in children taking higher doses of tiapride. Details: One clinical trial in children 6-16 years of age with Tourette syndrome or other tic disorders shows that taking taurine along with tiapride reduces the severity of tics when compared with tiapride alone. For every 6 children taking taurine, one additional child saw a 60% or greater reduction in tic severity as measured on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale when compared with placebo. However, taurine did not improve tic severity in children taking tiapride at a dose greater than 300 mg daily (103210). Taurine was taken in age-dependent doses of 2.4 grams daily in those 6-8 years, 3.6 grams daily in those 9-13 years, and 4.8 grams daily in those 14-16 years.
• Traumatic brain injury (TBI). It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with a TBI. Details: A small clinical study of adults in Iran receiving treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) following TBI shows that adding a specific taurine powder product (Nutricost) 30 mg/kg/day up to 3 grams daily to enteral nutrition for 14 days may modestly improve disease severity scores, but does not reduce days on the ventilator, ICU length of stay, or mortality at 30 days when compared with usual enteral nutrition (110573). Due to its small size, this study may have been underpowered to detect differences between groups. More evidence is needed to rate taurine for these uses.

(Read more about TAURINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used in amounts commonly found in foods.

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Alpha-alanine 100-140 mg/kg daily has been used with apparent safety for up to 3 months (16026,16027,16444). A single dose of alanine 40 grams has also been used with apparent safety (14612,16019,16020).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Alanine 90 mmol/L, as a component of an oral rehydration solution, has been used with apparent safety for approximately 48 hours in children age 3-48 months (16021).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used in amounts commonly found in foods. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of using larger amounts as medicine during pregnancy or lactation.

(Read more about ALANINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used in amounts commonly found in foods.

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately for medicinal purposes, short term. Beetroot juice has been safely used in clinical trials in doses of up to 500 mL daily for up to 7 days and a beetroot-based nutritional gel has been used safely in doses of up to 100 grams daily for 8 days (94461,94462,94464,100149,100152,100153).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of beets used medicinally during pregnancy and breast-feeding.

(Read more about BEET)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when taken orally as a single dose of up to 1500 mg (93328,93329). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of betaine hydrochloride when used in multiple doses.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about BETAINE HYDROCHLORIDE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. BCAAs 12 grams daily have not been associated with significant adverse effects in studies lasting for up to 2 years (68,72,73,74,10117,10146,10147,37120,92643,97531,103351,103352). ...when used intravenously and appropriately. BCAAs are an FDA-approved injectable product (13309).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in dietary amounts of 71-134 mg/kg daily (11120,13308).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when larger, supplemental doses are used orally and appropriately for up to 6 months (13307,13308,37127).

PREGNANCY:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using amounts greater than those found in food. Although adverse effects have not been reported in humans, some animal research suggests that consumption of supplemental isoleucine, a BCAA, during the first half of pregnancy may have variable effects on birth weight, possibly due to abnormal placental development (103350).

LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using amounts greater than those found in food. Although the safety of increased BCAA consumption during lactation is unclear, some clinical research suggests that a higher concentration of isoleucine and leucine in breastmilk during the first 6 months postpartum is not associated with infant growth or body composition at 2 weeks, 2 months, or 6 months (108466).

(Read more about BRANCHED-CHAIN AMINO ACIDS (BCAA))

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (7555,12928,12946,95817). However, excessive doses should be avoided. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: Age 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51+ years, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stone, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). Also, advise patients taking calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D (93533).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. The National Academy of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51 years and older, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients to not consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). Also, advise patients taking calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D (93533).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (17506).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (945,1586,3263,3264,17506). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prescribing oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancy to those with low dietary calcium intake to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the same daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age independent of pregnancy status: 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg (17506). Doses over these amounts might increase the risk of neonatal hypocalcemia-induced seizures possibly caused by transient neonatal hypoparathyroidism in the setting of excessive calcium supplementation during pregnancy, especially during the third trimester. Neonatal hypocalcemia is a risk factor for neonatal seizures (97345).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Glutamine has been safely used in clinical research in doses up to 40 grams per day or 1 gram/kg daily (2334,2337,2338,2365,5029,5462,7233,7288,7293), (52288,52307,52308,52311,52313,52337,52349,52350,96516,97366). A specific glutamine product (Endari) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (96520). ...when used intravenously. Glutamine has been safely incorporated into parenteral nutrition in doses up to 600 mg/kg daily in clinical trials (2363,2366,5448,5452,5453,5454,5458,7293,52272,52275), (52283,52289,52304,52306,52316,52341), (52359,52360,52371,52377,52381,52284,52385,52408,96637,96507,96516).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Glutamine has been shown to be safe in clinical research when used in amounts that do not exceed 0.7 grams/kg daily in children 1-18 years old (11364,46657,52321,52323,52363,86095,96517). A specific glutamine product (Endari) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for certain patients 5 years of age and older (96520). ...when used intravenously. Glutamine has been safely incorporated into parenteral nutrition in doses up to 0.4 grams/kg daily in clinical research (52338,96508). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of glutamine when used in larger amounts in children.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when consumed in amounts commonly found in foods. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of glutamine when used in larger amounts as medicine during pregnancy or lactation.

(Read more about GLUTAMINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately with lactose-containing foods. Lactase has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US when prepared from Candida pseudotropicalis or Kluyveromyces lactis (104108,104109). Lactase has been used safely in doses up to 9900 international units (IU) and up to 13,500 food chemical codex (FCC) units (2371,2372,2373,106669).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately with lactose-containing foods.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately with lactose-containing foods.

(Read more about LACTASE)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. L-arginine has been used safely in clinical studies at doses of up to 24 grams daily for up to 18 months (3331,3460,3595,3596,5531,5532,5533,6028,7815,7816)(8014,8473,13709,31943,91195,91196,91963,99264,99267,110380)(110387). A tolerable upper intake level (UL) for arginine has not been established, but the observed safe level (OSL) of arginine intake established in clinical research is 20 grams (31996). ...when used intravenously and appropriately. Parenteral L-arginine is an FDA-approved prescription product (15). ...when used topically and appropriately. L-arginine appears to be safe when 5 grams is applied as a topical cream twice daily for 2 weeks or when a dentifrice is used at a dose of 1.5% w/w for up to 2 years (14913,96806). ...when inhaled, short-term. L-arginine appears to be safe when inhaled twice daily at a dose of 500 mg for up to 2 weeks (96807).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally in premature infants and children (8474,32286,96803,97392,110391). ...when used intravenously and appropriately (97392). Parenteral L-arginine is an FDA-approved prescription product (15). ...when used topically, short-term. A dentifrice containing L-arginine appears to be safe when used at a dose of 1.5% w/w for up to 2 years in children at least 3.7 years of age (96806). ...when inhaled, short-term. L-arginine appears to be safe when inhaled twice daily at a dose of 500 mg for up to 2 weeks in children at least 13 years of age (96807).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used intravenously in high doses. Parenteral L-arginine is an FDA-approved prescription product (15). However, when higher than recommended doses are used, injection site reactions, hypersensitivity reactions, hematuria, and death have occurred in children (16817).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately, short-term. L-arginine 12 grams daily for 2 days has been used with apparent safety in pregnancy during the third trimester (11828). L-arginine 3 grams daily has been taken safely during the second and/or third trimesters (31938,110379,110382). ...when used intravenously and appropriately, short-term. Intravenous L-arginine 20-30 grams daily has been used safely in pregnancy for up to 5 days (31847,31933,31961,31978).

LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about L-ARGININE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. L-carnitine has been safely used in clinical trials lasting up to 12 months (1947,3620,3621,3623,3624,3625,3626,3627,3628,3629) (3630,3639,4949,8047,9790,12352,16104,16105,16106,16107) (16109,16110,23437,26496,26499,58150,58156,58161,58169,58182) (58189,58204,58207,58209,58213,58294,58523,58554,58556,58647) (58679,58715,58778,58793,58830,58831,58882,59023,59029,59043) (90624,90633,104177,111872,111876,111883,111884,111891,111898). ...when used parenterally as an FDA-approved prescription medicine. Avoid using D-carnitine and DL-carnitine. These forms of carnitine can act as competitive inhibitors of L-carnitine and may cause symptoms of L-carnitine deficiency (1946).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. L-carnitine has been safely used orally in children for up to 6 months (1433,3622,58166,58502,58981,59188,111887,111900,115351). It has also been safely used orally and intravenously in preterm infants (3633,3634,3635,3636,3637,58163,58190,58800,58902,59097)(59161).

PREGNANCY:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally. Supplemental doses of L-carnitine have been given to infants in breast milk and formula with no reported adverse effects. The effects of large doses used while nursing are unknown, but L-carnitine is secreted in the breast milk (3616).

(Read more about L-CARNITINE)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. In clinical trials, L-citrulline has been used with apparent safety for up to 2 months at doses of 1.5-6 grams daily (94954,94956,94961,94962,100974). Doses of up to 15 grams have also been used as single doses or within a 24 hour period (16470,16473).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. L-citrulline has been used with apparent safety in infants at a dose of 0.17 grams/kg daily (16472). It has also been used in children 6.5-10 years of age at a dose of 7.5 grams daily for 26 weeks (100976). ...when used intravenously and appropriately. An intravenous bolus dose of L-citrulline 150 mg/kg followed by 9 mg/kg/hour for 48 hours has been used safely in children under 6 years of age (16469).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about L-CITRULLINE)

There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of lipase.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase (rhBSSL) is used orally by premature infants. Adding rhBSSL to infant formula or pasteurized breast milk increases the risk for serious gastrointestinal adverse effects in premature infants (101940).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about LIPASE)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Various proteolytic enzymes have been safely used orally in clinical research (716,964,965,968,969,6252,6253,10622,11457,18281,18284) (91104,91105,91106,91111,96449). Side effects are typically mild to moderate and most often include gastrointestinal effects. See specific monographs for more detailed information related to the safety of individual proteolytic enzymes. ...when used topically and appropriately. Various proteolytic enzymes have been safely used topically in clinical research (67835,67843,67845,91113). Some proteolytic enzymes might cause allergic reactions when used topically. See specific monographs for more detailed information related to the safety of individual proteolytic enzymes.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES))

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher doses can be safely used therapeutically with appropriate medical monitoring (26226,26227).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid exceeding the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension and increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (26229,98176,98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,100310,109395,109396,109398,109399). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sodium when used topically.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (26229,100310). Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid prolonged use of doses exceeding the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension (26229).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in higher doses. Higher intake can cause hypertension (100310). Also, both the highest and the lowest pre-pregnancy sodium quintile intakes are associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia, and the delivery of small for gestational age (SGA) infants when compared to the middle intake quintile (106264).

(Read more about SODIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used in amounts found in foods. Typical daily intakes for adults range from 40-400 mg (101471).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts. Taurine 2-4 grams daily in two or three divided doses has been used safely in studies lasting up to 3 months (5248,5271,8217,8221,10454,77147,95612,98337,104165,104167). Higher doses of taurine 6 grams daily have been used safely in studies lasting up to 4 weeks (98336,98337). A risk assessment of orally administered taurine has identified an Observed Safe Level (OSL) of up to 3 grams daily for healthy adults (31996).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used in amounts found in foods.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts. Taurine 2.4-4.8 grams daily in three divided doses has been safely used in children 6-16 years of age for up to 12 weeks (103210).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used in amounts found in foods. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of taurine when used in medicinal amounts during pregnancy and lactation; avoid using.

(Read more about TAURINE)

(Read more about ALANINE)

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, beet might decrease the levels and clinical effects of CYP1A2 substrates.  Details In vitro research suggests that beet induces CYP1A2 enzymes (111404).

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, beet might increase the levels of CYP3A4 substrates.  Details In vitro research suggests that betanin, the major pigment in beet, competitively inhibits CYP3A4 in a dose-dependent manner similarly to strong CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole (113425).

(Read more about BEET)

ANTACIDS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Betaine hydrochloride increases stomach acidity and could decrease the effects of antacids.  Details In human research, betaine hydrochloride increases stomach acidity (93328,93329). Antacids are taken to decrease stomach acidity. Theoretically, taking betaine hydrochloride along with antacids might decrease the effects of the antacids.

H2-BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Betaine hydrochloride increases stomach acidity and could decrease the effects of H2-blockers.  Details In human research, betaine hydrochloride increases stomach acidity (93328,93329). H2-blockers are used to decrease stomach acidity. Theoretically, taking betaine hydrochloride along with H2-blockers might decrease the effects of H2-blockers.

PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS (PPIs) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Betaine hydrochloride increases stomach acidity and could decrease the effects of PPIs.  Details In human research, betaine hydrochloride increases stomach acidity (93328,93329). PPIs are used to decrease stomach acidity. Theoretically, taking betaine hydrochloride along with PPIs might decrease the effects of PPIs

(Read more about BETAINE HYDROCHLORIDE)

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, BCAAs might alter the effects of antidiabetes medications.  Details Some evidence suggests that BCAAs might stimulate insulin release (10105,10110,10113,10114,10118). However, a small clinical study in adults with liver cirrhosis and high nocturnal levels of blood glucose suggests that BCAAs might increase blood glucose levels (103348).

LEVODOPA Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B BCAAs in large doses can reduce the effects of levodopa.  Details BCAAs may compete with levodopa for transport systems in the intestine and brain and decrease the effectiveness of levodopa (66,2719). Small clinical studies how that concomitant ingestion of protein or high doses of leucine or isoleucine (100 mg/kg) and levodopa can exacerbate tremor, rigidity, and the "on-off" syndrome in patients with Parkinson disease (3291,3292,3293,3294).

(Read more about BRANCHED-CHAIN AMINO ACIDS (BCAA))

ALUMINUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium citrate might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity. Other types of calcium do not increase aluminum absorption.  Details Calcium citrate can increase the absorption of aluminum when taken with aluminum hydroxide. The increase in aluminum levels may become toxic, particularly in individuals with kidney disease (21631). However, the effect of calcium citrate on aluminum absorption is due to the citrate anion rather than calcium cation. Calcium acetate does not appear to increase aluminum absorption (93006).

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.  Details Advise patients to take bisphosphonates at least 30 minutes before calcium, but preferably at a different time of day. Calcium supplements decrease absorption of bisphosphonates (12937).

CALCIPOTRIENE (Dovonex) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Taking calcipotriene with calcium might increase the risk for hypercalcemia.  Details Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (12938). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with calcium supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Intravenous calcium may decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers; oral calcium is unlikely to have this effect.  Details Intravenous calcium is used to decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers in the management of overdose. Intravenous calcium gluconate has been used before intravenous verapamil (Isoptin) to prevent or reduce the hypotensive effects without affecting the antiarrhythmic effects (6124). But there is no evidence that dietary or supplemental calcium when taken orally interacts with calcium channel blockers (12939,12947).

CEFTRIAXONE (Rocephin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Co-administration of intravenous calcium and ceftriaxone can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys.  Details Avoid administering intravenous calcium in any form, such as parenteral nutrition or Lactated Ringers, within 48 hours of intravenous ceftriaxone. Case reports in neonates show that administering intravenous ceftriaxone and calcium can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys. In several cases, neonates have died as a result of this interaction (15794,21632). So far there are no reports in adults; however, there is still concern that this interaction might occur in adults.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Using intravenous calcium with digoxin might increase the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias.  Details Hypercalcemia increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with digoxin (12940). However, one retrospective analysis of clinical data suggests that intravenous calcium does not increase the risk of dysrhythmias or mortality in patients receiving digoxin (38960).

DILTIAZEM (Cardizem, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, calcium might increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of diltiazem.

DOLUTEGRAVIR (Tivicay) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of dolutegravir.  Details Advise patients to take dolutegravir either 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium carbonate 1200 mg concomitantly with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces plasma levels of dolutegravir by almost 40%. Calcium appears to decrease levels of dolutegravir through chelation (93578).

ELVITEGRAVIR (Vitekta) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of elvitegravir.  Details Advise patients to take elvitegravir either 2 hours before or 2 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium along with elvitegravir can reduce blood levels of elvitegravir through chelation (94166).

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption and effectiveness of levothyroxine.  Details Advise patients to take levothyroxine and calcium supplements at least 4 hours apart. Calcium reduces levothyroxine absorption, probably by forming insoluble complexes (5082). Calcium carbonate supplements reduce effectiveness of levothyroxine in patients with hypothyroidism (5081,5082,6137).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use of calcium and lithium may increase this risk of hypercalcemia.  Details Clinical research suggests that long-term use of lithium may cause hypercalcemia in 10% to 60% of patients (38953). Theoretically, concomitant use of lithium and calcium supplements may further increase this risk.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of quinolone antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral quinolones at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements or calcium-fortified foods. Taking calcium at the same time as oral quinolones can reduce quinolone absorption. Calcium binds to quinolones in the gut (4412,10339,21638,38570).

RALTEGRAVIR (Isentress) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium may reduce levels of raltegravir.  Details Pharmacokinetic research shows that taking a single dose of calcium carbonate 3000 mg along with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily modestly decreases the mean area under the curve of raltegravir, but the decrease does not necessitate a dose adjustment of raltegravir (94164). However, a case of elevated HIV-1 RNA levels and documented resistance to raltegravir has been reported for a patient taking calcium carbonate 1 gram three times daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU three times daily in combination with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 11 months. It is thought that calcium reduced raltegravir levels by chelation, leading to treatment failure (94165).

SOTALOL (Betapace) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of sotalol.  Details Advise patients to separate doses by at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium. Calcium appears to reduce the absorption of sotalol, probably by forming insoluble complexes (10018).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral tetracyclines at least 2 hours before, or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements. Taking calcium at the same time as oral tetracyclines can reduce tetracycline absorption. Calcium binds to tetracyclines in the gut (1843).

THIAZIDE DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Taking calcium along with thiazides might increase the risk of hypercalcemia and renal failure.  Details Thiazides reduce calcium excretion by the kidneys (1902). Using thiazides along with moderately large amounts of calcium carbonate increases the risk of milk-alkali syndrome (hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis, renal failure). Patients may need to have their serum calcium levels and/or parathyroid function monitored regularly.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, use of calcium supplements may increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of verapamil.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

ANTICONVULSANTS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, glutamine might antagonize the effects of anticonvulsant medications.  Details Glutamine is metabolized to the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate. Glutamate might have antagonistic effects with anticonvulsant drugs (7292,7293,7294). However, this interaction has not yet been reported in humans.

(Read more about GLUTAMINE)

(Read more about LACTASE)

ACE INHIBITORS (ACEIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use of L-arginine and ACE inhibitors may increase the risk for hypotension and hyperkalemia.  Details Combining L-arginine with some antihypertensive drugs, especially ACE inhibitors, seems to have additive vasodilating and blood pressure-lowering effects (7822,20192,31854,31916). Furthermore, ACE inhibitors can increase potassium levels. Use of L-arginine has been associated with hyperkalemia in some patients (32213,32218). Theoretically, concomitant use of ACE inhibitors with L-arginine may increases the risk of hyperkalemia.

ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKERS (ARBs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use of L-arginine and ARBs may increase the risk of hypotension and hyperkalemia.  Details L-arginine increases nitric oxide, which causes vasodilation (7822). Combining L-arginine with ARBs seems to increase L-arginine-induced vasodilation (31854). Furthermore, ARBs can increase potassium levels. Use of L-arginine has been associated with hyperkalemia in some patients (32213,32218). Theoretically, concomitant use of ARBs with L-arginine may increases the risk of hyperkalemia.

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use of L-arginine with anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs might have additive effects and increase the risk of bleeding.  Details Preliminary research suggests that L-arginine infusions reduce platelet aggregation in humans (32260,31864,32239,32220,32257,32263,32276,32188). The clinical significance of this effect is unclear.

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use of L-arginine might have additive effects with antidiabetes drugs.  Details Preliminary clinical research shows that L-arginine decreases blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes (31964,32085,31964,104225).

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use of L-arginine and antihypertensive drugs may increase the risk of hypotension.  Details L-arginine increases nitric oxide, which causes vasodilation (7822). Clinical evidence shows that L-arginine can reduce blood pressure in some individuals with hypertension (7818,10636,31871,32201,32167,32225,31923,32232,110383,110384). Furthermore, combining L-arginine with some antihypertensive drugs seems to have additive vasodilating and blood pressure-lowering effects (7822,20192,31854,31916).

ISOPROTERENOL (Isuprel) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concurrent use of isoproterenol and L-arginine might result in additive effects and hypotension.  Details Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that L-arginine enhances isoproterenol-induced vasodilation in patients with essential hypertension or a family history of essential hypertension (31932).

POTASSIUM-SPARING DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically concomitant use of potassium-sparing diuretics with L-arginine may increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details Potassium-sparing diuretics can increase potassium levels. Use of L-arginine has been associated with hyperkalemia in some patients (32213,32218).

SILDENAFIL (Viagra) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concurrent use of sildenafil and L-arginine might increase the risk for hypotension.  Details In vivo, concurrent use of L-arginine and sildenafil has resulted in increased vasodilation (7822,8015,10636). Theoretically, concurrent use might have additive vasodilatory and hypotensive effects. However, in studies evaluating the combined use of L-arginine and sildenafil for erectile dysfunction, hypotension was not reported (105065).

TESTOSTERONE Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use of L-arginine and testosterone might have additive effects.  Details In clinical research, L-arginine increases the level of testosterone in male patients with erectile dysfunction (102586,104222). The clinical significance of this finding is unclear.

(Read more about L-ARGININE)

ACENOCOUMAROL (Sintrom) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, L-carnitine might increase the anticoagulant effects of acenocoumarol.  Details L-carnitine might enhance the anticoagulant effects of acenocoumarol, an oral anticoagulant similar to warfarin, but shorter-acting (9878,12165). There are at least two case reports of INR elevation with concomitant use. In one case, a 33-year-old male with a previously stable INR had an elevated INR of 4.65 after L-carnitine was started and continued for 10 weeks. INR normalized after discontinuation of the L-carnitine-containing product (12165).

THYROID HORMONE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, L-carnitine might decrease the effectiveness of thyroid hormone replacement.  Details L-carnitine appears to act as a peripheral thyroid hormone antagonist by inhibiting entry of thyroid hormone into the nucleus of cells (12761). Taking L-carnitine also seems to diminish some of the symptoms of hyperthyroidism (8047).

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, L-carnitine might increase the anticoagulant effects of warfarin.  Details L-carnitine might increase the anticoagulant effects of acenocoumarol, a shorter-acting oral anticoagulant similar to warfarin (9878,12165). There is not enough information to know whether this interaction occurs with L-carnitine and warfarin.

(Read more about L-CARNITINE)

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use of L-citrulline with antihypertensive drugs might have additive effects and increase the chance of hypotension.  Details L-citrulline is converted to L-arginine, which can increase nitric oxide and cause vasodilation (7822,16460,16461). However, a meta-analysis of 5 small clinical studies suggests that taking L-citrulline 3-6 grams daily for 1-8 weeks does not lower blood pressure when compared with control (100974).

PHOSPHODIESTERASE-5 INHIBITORS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concurrent use of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors and L-citrulline might result in additive vasodilation.  Details L-citrulline is converted to L-arginine, which can increase nitric oxide and cause vasodilation (7822,16460,16461). Theoretically, taking L-arginine with PDE-5 inhibitors might have additive vasodilatory and hypotensive effects. However, in studies evaluating the combined use of L-arginine and sildenafil for erectile dysfunction, hypotension was not reported (105065).

(Read more about L-CITRULLINE)

(Read more about LIPASE)

(Read more about PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES))

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = A Theoretically, a high intake of dietary sodium might reduce the effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs.  Details High intake of dietary sodium can increase systolic and diastolic blood pressure (26222). Also, high intake of sodium may necessitate increased use of antihypertensive medications to achieve blood pressure control in some patients, such as those with chronic kidney disease (26223).

CORTICOSTEROIDS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids with sodium supplements might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids (corticosteroids) cause sodium retention. This effect is dose-related and depends on mineralocorticoid potency. It is most common with hydrocortisone, cortisone, and fludrocortisone, followed by prednisone and prednisolone (4425).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Altering dietary intake of sodium might alter the levels and clinical effects of lithium.  Details High sodium intake can reduce plasma concentrations of lithium by increasing lithium excretion (26225). Reducing sodium intake can significantly increase plasma concentrations of lithium and cause lithium toxicity in patients being treated with lithium carbonate (26224,26225). Stabilizing sodium intake is shown to reduce the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L (112909). Patients taking lithium should avoid significant alterations in their dietary intake of sodium.

SODIUM-CONTAINING DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of sodium-containing drugs with additional sodium from dietary or supplemental sources may increase the risk of hypernatremia and long-term sodium-related complications.  Details The Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams of sodium daily indicates the intake at which it is believed that chronic disease risk increases for the apparently healthy population (100310). Some medications contain high quantities of sodium. When used in conjunction with sodium supplements or high-sodium diets, the CDRR may be exceeded. Additionally, concomitant use may increase the risk for hypernatremia; this risk is highest in the elderly and people with other risk factors for electrolyte disturbances.

TOLVAPTAN (Samsca) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, concomitant use of tolvaptan with sodium might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Tolvaptan is a vasopressin receptor 2 antagonist that is used to increase sodium levels in patients with hyponatremia (29406). Patients taking tolvaptan should use caution with the use of sodium salts such as sodium chloride.

(Read more about SODIUM)

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taurine might increase the risk of hypotension when taken with antihypertensive drugs.  Details Some clinical evidence suggests that taurine can reduce both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (77229,95614,104166).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taurine might reduce excretion and increase plasma levels of lithium.  Details Taurine is thought to have diuretic properties (3647), which might reduce the excretion of lithium.

(Read more about TAURINE)

General ...There is currently a limited amount of information on the adverse effects of alanine.

(Read more about ALANINE)

General ...Orally, beet seems to be well tolerated when used for medicinal purposes, short term.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Red stools and red urine.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Hypocalcemia and kidney damage when ingested in large amounts.

Endocrine ...Theoretically, ingestion of large quantities of beets could lead to hypocalcemia because of the oxaluric acid content (18).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, beet juice may cause red stools (94470,97726,100142,100145,105762). This red coloring of the stools is not harmful. Additionally, beet supplementation has been reported to cause black stools. In one case, a 79-year-old male on apixaban and clopidogrel presented with black stools, nausea, and vomiting after taking beet pills 2-3 days prior. The likelihood of upper gastrointestinal bleed was determined to be low based on factors such as normal vital signs and lack of severe anemia. The patient was diagnosed with beet-induced pseudo-hematochezia which was successfully treated with fluids and discontinuation of the beet supplement (113426).
Other less common gastrointestinal side effects include loose stools, constipation, and nausea (100149).

Genitourinary ...Orally, beet is known to produce red or pink urine (beeturia) in some people (32569,34134,94464,94470,97725,97726,100142,100145,100152,105762,113422). However, this red coloring of the urine is not harmful and dissipates after about 12 hours (113422).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, vivid dreams and worsening headaches have each occurred in one person in a clinical trial, although it is not clear if this is due to beet (97723).

Renal ...Theoretically, ingestion of large quantities of beets could lead to kidney damage due to its oxaluric acid content (18).

(Read more about BEET)

General ...Orally, betaine hydrochloride is generally well tolerated when taken as a single dose.

Gastrointestinal ...Theoretically, the hydrochloric acid produced from betaine hydrochloride might irritate gastric or duodenal ulcers or impede ulcer healing. It might also cause heartburn.

(Read more about BETAINE HYDROCHLORIDE)

General ...Orally or intravenously, BCAAs are generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal distension, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting.
All routes of administration: High doses can lead to fatigue and loss of motor coordination.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, a single case of hypertension following the use of BCAAs has been reported (37143).

Dermatologic ...Orally, a single case of skin blanching following the use of BCAAs has been reported (681). It is not known if this effect was due to use of BCAAs or other factors.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, BCAAs can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal distension. Nausea and diarrhea has been reported to occur in about 10% of people taking BCAAs (10117,37143,92643,97531).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally and intravenously, BCAAs can cause fatigue and loss of motor coordination due to increased plasma ammonia levels (693,694,10117). Short-term use of 60 grams of BCAAs containing leucine, isoleucine, and valine for 7 days in patients with normal metabolic function seems to increase levels of ammonia, but not to toxic plasma levels (10117). However, liver function should be monitored with high doses or long-term use (10117). Due to the potential of increased plasma levels of ammonia and subsequent fatigue and loss of motor coordination, BCAAs should be used cautiously before or during activities where performance depends on motor coordination (75). Orally, BCAAs may also cause headache, but this has only been reported in one clinical trial (681).

(Read more about BRANCHED-CHAIN AMINO ACIDS (BCAA))

General ...Orally and intravenously, calcium is well-tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Belching, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, and stomach upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about calciphylaxis and kidney stones.

Cardiovascular ...There has been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these results, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and CVD, CHD, or MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482). To minimize the possible risk of CVD, CHD, or MI, advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). While dietary intake of calcium is preferred over supplemental intake, advise patients who require calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D, as this combination does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI (93533).
Rarely, calcium intake can increase the risk of calciphylaxis, which usually occurs in patients with kidney failure. Calciphylaxis is the deposition of calcium phosphate in arterioles, which causes skin ulcers and skin necrosis. In a case report, a 64-year-old female with a history of neck fracture, sepsis, and ischemic colitis presented with painful leg ulcers due to calciphylaxis. She discontinued calcium and vitamin D supplementation and was treated with sodium thiosulfate and supportive care (95816).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, calcium can cause belching, flatulence, nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, and diarrhea (1824,1843,12950,38803). Although constipation is frequently cited as an adverse effect of calcium, there is no scientific substantiation of this side effect (1824,1843,1844,1845,12950,38978). Calcium carbonate has been reported to cause acid rebound, but this is controversial (12935,12936).

Oncologic ...There is some concern that very high doses of calcium might increase the risk of prostate cancer. Some epidemiological evidence suggests that consuming over 2000 mg/day of dietary calcium might increase the risk for prostate cancer (4825,12949). Additional research suggests that calcium intake over 1500 mg/day might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer and prostate cancer mortality (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a small increase in prostate cancer risk (98894). However, contradictory research suggests no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall prostate cancer risk (14131,14132,104630). More evidence is needed to determine the effect of calcium, if any, on prostate cancer risk.

Renal ...Kidney stones have been reported in individuals taking calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily in combination with vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 4 years (93943).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

General ...Orally and intravenously, glutamine is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Belching, bloating, constipation, cough, diarrhea, flatulence, gastrointestinal pain, headache, musculoskeletal pain, nausea, and vomiting.

Endocrine ...One case of hot flashes has been reported in a patient taking glutamine 5-15 grams orally twice daily for up to 1 year (96520).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, glutamine has been associated with belching, bloating, constipation, flatulence, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and gastrointestinal (GI) pain. Nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, and GI pain have been reported in clinical trials using high-dose glutamine 10-30 grams (0.3 grams/kg) in two divided doses daily to treat sickle cell disease (99414). One case of dyspepsia and one case of abdominal pain have been reported in patients taking glutamine 5-15 grams twice daily orally for up to 1 year (96520). In a small trial of healthy males, taking a single dose of about 60 grams (0.9 grams/kg of fat free body mass [FFM]) was associated with a 50% to 79% incidence of GI discomfort, nausea, and belching, compared with a 7% to 28% incidence with a lower dose of about 20 grams (0.3 gram/kg FFM). Flatulence, bloating, lower GI pain, and urge to regurgitate occurred at similar rates regardless of dose, and there were no cases of heartburn, vomiting, or diarrhea/constipation (105013). It is possible that certain GI side effects occur only after multiple doses of glutamine.

Musculoskeletal ...Orally, glutamine 30 grams daily has been associated with cases of musculoskeletal pain and non-cardiac chest pain in clinical trials for patients with sickle cell disease (99414).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, glutamine has been associated with dizziness and headache. A single case of dizziness has been reported in a patient treated with oral glutamine 0.5 grams/kg. However, the symptom resolved after reducing the dose to 0.25 grams/kg (91356). Mania and hypomania have been reported in 2 patients with bipolar disorder taking commercially purchased glutamine up to 4 grams daily (7291). Glutamine is metabolized to glutamate and ammonia, both of which might have neurological effects in people with neurological and psychiatric diseases or in people predisposed to hepatic encephalopathy (7293).

Oncologic ...There is some concern that glutamine might be used by rapidly growing tumors and possibly stimulate tumor growth. Although tumors may utilize glutamine and other amino acids, preliminary research shows that glutamine supplementation does not increase tumor growth (5469,7233,7738). In fact, there is preliminary evidence that glutamine might actually reduce tumor growth (5469).

Other ...Orally, glutamine has been associated with cough when a powdered formulation is used. It is unclear if this was due to accidental inhalation. One case of a burning sensation and one case of hypersplenism has been reported in a patient taking glutamine 5-15 grams twice daily orally for up to 1 year (96520).

(Read more about GLUTAMINE)

General ...Orally, lactase is generally well tolerated.

Immunologic ...A case of lactase-induced contact dermatitis and immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic rhinoconjunctivitis has been reported in a worker exposed to powdered lactase. Allergy to lactase was confirmed by prick test, open application test, and chamber challenge test (96348).

(Read more about LACTASE)

General ...Oral, intravenous, and topical L-arginine are generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, bloating, nausea, diarrhea, headache, insomnia, flushing.
Intravenously: Excessively rapid infusion can cause flushing, headache, nausea and vomiting, numbness, and venous irritation.

Cardiovascular ...L-arginine taken orally by pregnant patients in a nutrition bar containing other antioxidants was associated with a 36% greater risk of palpitations when compared with a placebo bar (91197). It is unclear if this effect was due to L-arginine, other ingredients, or other factors.

Dermatologic ...Orally, arginine can cause flushing, rash, and hives (3460,32138,102587,104223). The skin reactions were likely of allergic etiology as oral L-arginine has been associated with eosinophilia (32138). In one case report, intravenous administration caused allergic reactions including urticaria, periorbital edema, and pruritus (11830). Excessively rapid infusion of L-arginine has caused flushing, local venous irritation, numbness. Extravasation has caused necrosis and superficial phlebitis (3330,16817).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, L-arginine has been reported to cause nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, dyspepsia, gastrointestinal discomfort, and bloating (1363,31855,31871,31972,31978,32261,90198,91197,96811,99243)(102587,102592).
Orally, L-arginine has been reported to cause esophagitis in at least six adolescents. Symptoms, which included pain and dysphagia, occurred within 1-3 months of treatment in most cases (102588). There are at least two cases of acute pancreatitis possibly associated with oral L-arginine. In one case, a 28-year-old male developed pancreatitis after consuming a shake containing 1.2 grams of L-arginine daily as arginine alpha-ketoglutarate. The shake also contained plant extracts, caffeine, vitamins, and other amino acids. Although there is a known relationship between L-arginine and pancreatitis in animal models, it is not clear if L-arginine was directly responsible for the occurrence of pancreatitis in this case (99266).
Intravenously, excessively rapid infusion of L-arginine has been reported to cause nausea and vomiting (3330,16817).

Musculoskeletal ...Intravenous L-arginine has been associated with lower back pain and leg restlessness (32273). Orally, L-arginine has been associated with asthenia (32138).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, L-arginine has been associated with headache (31855,31955,32261,91197,102587,102592), insomnia, fatigue (102587,102592), and vertigo (32150,102592).

Oncologic ...In breast cancer patients, L-arginine stimulated tumor protein synthesis, which suggests stimulated tumor growth (31917).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...When inhaled, L-arginine can cause airway inflammation and exacerbation of airway inflammation in asthma (121). However, two studies assessing oral L-arginine in patients with asthma did not detect any adverse airway effects (31849,104223).

Renal ...Intravenously, L-arginine has been associated with natriuresis, kaliuresis, chloruresis, and systemic acidosis (32225). Orally, L-arginine can cause gout (3331,3595).

Other ...Orally, L-arginine has been associated with delayed menses, night sweats, and flushing (31855).

(Read more about L-ARGININE)

General ...Orally and intravenously, L-carnitine is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
All routes of administration: Abdominal cramps, abdominal pain, diarrhea, gastritis, heartburn, nausea, reduced appetite, and vomiting. A fish-like body odor has also been reported.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
All routes of administration: Seizures.

Cardiovascular ...According to population research, plasma L-carnitine levels are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and major cardiac events (90635). However, oral supplementation with L-carnitine does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. In fact, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that L-carnitine supplementation is associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality, as well as ventricular arrhythmias and the development of angina and does not increase the development of heart failure or myocardial reinfarction (59037). Also, another meta-analysis suggests that L-carnitine does not affect mortality or cardiovascular outcomes in patients with a previous myocardial infarction (90630).

Dermatologic ...Orally, L-carnitine has been reported to cause skin rash in a small number of cases (16105,91724). Two patients in a hair growth study using topical carnitine reported mild itching and increased dandruff, while a third reported strong itching with reddish bumps and a burning sensation (58390). When a specific formulation containing L-carnitine, licochalcone, and 1,2-decanediol was applied to the face, mild skin dryness and tightness was reported by 12% of volunteers, compared with 4% to 8% of those in the vehicle-only control group (26493).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally and intravenously, L-carnitine has been associated with nausea, epigastric discomfort, vomiting, abdominal cramps, heartburn, gastritis, anorexia, and diarrhea (3616,3624,59030,95069,95070,101562,107410,111870,111887,111891). Orally, diarrhea or colitis symptoms (1433,3630,16105,16107,16111,23437,58523,58554,59020,90623), nausea and abdominal pain (16105,16106,26499,58169,58392,58554,90623,90634), indigestion (26703), and constipation (58523) have been reported in various clinical trials.

Hematologic ...In one case report, L-carnitine 990 mg twice daily was started in a female presenting to hospital with valproic acid toxicity. Blood phosphorous levels subsequently fell from 2.3 mg/dL to 1.3 mg/dL over 4 days. After discontinuation of L-carnitine, blood phosphorus levels increased to 1.8 mg/dL. The authors suggested that the role of L-carnitine in improved protein metabolism may play a role in the declining levels of phosphorous in the blood and increased risk of hypophosphatemia (90628).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally or intravenously, L-carnitine has been associated with seizures (3616). Orally, use of L-carnitine in clinical trials has resulted in headache, although this event is rare (58554,95070,111891). L-carnitine may also cause agitation (95070).

Other ...Orally or intravenously, L-carnitine has been associated with a fish-like body odor (1433,3616,58166,59854,90623). One of its metabolites, trimethylamine N-oxide, can cause the urine, breath, and sweat to have a fishy odor (12756,58664).

(Read more about L-CARNITINE)

General ...Orally, L-citrulline seems to be generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Gastrointestinal discomfort, heartburn.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, gastrointestinal intolerance, stomach discomfort, and heartburn have been reported with L-citrulline use (94955,94963,94966).

Genitourinary ...Orally, 2 of 25 patients with pulmonary hypertension reported increased urinary frequency and edema while taking 1 gram of powdered L-citrulline in water daily (94963).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Orally, 2 of 25 patients with pulmonary hypertension reported cough while taking 1 gram of powdered L-citrulline in water daily (94963).

(Read more about L-CITRULLINE)

General ...No adverse effects have been reported in adults. However, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as necrotizing enterocolitis, when recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase is used in premature infants.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, when added to the formula or pasteurized breast milk consumed by premature infants, recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase (rhBSSL) can cause gastrointestinal adverse effects, including abdominal distension, flatulence, constipation, colic, abdominal pain, gastroenteritis, vomiting, regurgitation, and rectal bleeding (101940). Premature infants receiving rhBSSL also had a slightly higher rate of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) when compared with those receiving placebo. After review by a panel of experts, it was determined that the rate of confirmed or suspected NEC in infants consuming rhBSSL was 3.3%, compared with 0.5% in those receiving placebo. Although this rate of NEC is lower than the historical rate of occurrence in premature infants (11%), a possible increased risk for NEC cannot be ruled out (101940).

(Read more about LIPASE)

General ...Orally, proteolytic enzymes are generally well tolerated. See specific monographs for detailed safety information related to individual proteolytic enzymes.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Gastrointestinal upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Topically: Allergic reactions.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, some patients taking proteolytic enzymes may have gastrointestinal complaints (101517).

Immunologic ...Proteolytic enzymes are commonly found in laundry detergents and pre-spotter products. Rarely, protease specific IgE positive tests possibly related to these products have occurred. Exposure may be airborne or topical (102705). In addition, in case reports, occupational exposure to the airborne proteolytic enzyme pepsin has resulted in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis or asthma (102706,102707).

(Read more about PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES))

General ...Orally, sodium is well tolerated when used in moderation at intakes up to the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level. Topically, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Worsened cardiovascular disease, hypertension, kidney disease.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, intake of sodium above the CDRR intake level can exacerbate hypertension and hypertension-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) (26229,98176,100310,106263). A meta-analysis of observational research has found a linear association between increased sodium intake and increased hypertension risk (109398). Observational research has also found an association between increased sodium salt intake and increased risk of CVD, mortality, and cardiovascular mortality (98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,109395,109396,109399). However, the existing research is unable to confirm a causal relationship between sodium intake and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; high-quality, prospective research is needed to clarify this relationship (100312). As there is no known benefit with increased salt intake that would outweigh the potential increased risk of CVD, advise patients to limit salt intake to no more than the CDRR intake level (100310).
A reduction in sodium intake can lower systolic blood pressure by a small amount in most individuals, and diastolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension (100310,100311,106261). However, post hoc analysis of a small crossover clinical study in White patients suggests that 24-hour blood pressure variability is not affected by high-salt intake compared with low-salt intake (112910). Additionally, the available research is insufficient to confirm that a further reduction in sodium intake below the CDRR intake level will lower the risk for chronic disease (100310,100311). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that reducing sodium intake increases levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides, but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, by a small amount (106261).
It is unclear whether there are safety concerns when sodium is consumed in amounts lower than the adequate intake (AI) levels. Some observational research has found that the lowest levels of sodium intake might be associated with increased risk of death and cardiovascular events (98181,98183). However, this finding has been criticized because some of the studies used inaccurate measures of sodium intake, such as the Kawasaki formula (98177,98178,101259). Some observational research has found that sodium intake based on a single 24-hour urinary measurement is inversely correlated with all-cause mortality (106260). The National Academies Consensus Study Report states that there is insufficient evidence from observational studies to conclude that there are harmful effects from low sodium intake (100310).

Endocrine ...Orally, a meta-analysis of observational research has found that higher sodium intake is associated with an average increase in body mass index (BMI) of 1. 24 kg/m2 and an approximate 5 cm increase in waist circumference (98182). It has been hypothesized that the increase in BMI is related to an increased thirst, resulting in an increased intake of sugary beverages and/or consumption of foods that are high in salt and also high in fat and energy (98182). One large observational study has found that the highest sodium intake is not associated with overweight or obesity when compared to the lowest intake in adolescents aged 12-19 years when intake of energy and sugar-sweetened beverages are considered (106265). However, in children aged 6-11 years, usual sodium intake is positively associated with increased weight and central obesity independently of the intake of energy and/or sugar-sweetened beverages (106265).

Gastrointestinal ...In one case report, severe gastritis and a deep antral ulcer occurred in a patient who consumed 16 grams of sodium chloride in one sitting (25759). Chronic use of high to moderately high amounts of sodium chloride has been associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer (29405).

Musculoskeletal ...Observational research has found that low sodium levels can increase the risk for osteoporosis. One study has found that low plasma sodium levels are associated with an increased risk for osteoporosis. Low levels, which are typically caused by certain disease states or chronic medications, are associated with a more than 2-fold increased odds for osteoporosis and bone fractures (101260).
Conversely, in healthy males on forced bed rest, a high intake of sodium chloride (7.7 mEq/kg daily) seems to exacerbate disuse-induced bone and muscle loss (25760,25761).

Oncologic ...Population research has found that high or moderately high intake of sodium chloride is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer when compared with low sodium chloride intake (29405). Other population research in patients with gastric cancer has found that a high intake of sodium is associated with an approximate 65% increased risk of gastric cancer mortality when compared with a low intake. When zinc intake is taken into consideration, the increased risk of mortality only occurred in those with low zinc intake, but the risk was increased to approximately 2-fold in this sub-population (109400).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...In patients with hypertension, population research has found that sodium excretion is modestly and positively associated with having moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea. This association was not found in normotensive patients (106262).

Renal ...Increased sodium intake has been associated with impaired kidney function in healthy adults. This effect seems to be independent of blood pressure. Observational research has found that a high salt intake over approximately 5 years is associated with a 29% increased risk of developing impaired kidney function when compared with a lower salt intake. In this study, high salt intake was about 2-fold higher than low salt intake (101261).

(Read more about SODIUM)

General ...Orally, taurine is generally well-tolerated when used in typical doses for up to one year.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Constipation, diarrhea, and dyspepsia.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Hypersensitivity reactions in sensitive individuals. Case reports raise concerns for serious cardiovascular adverse effects, but these reports have involved energy drinks containing taurine and other ingredients. It is unclear if these adverse effects are due to taurine, other ingredients, or the combination.

Cardiovascular ...Changes in heart rate and increased blood pressure have been reported following the co-administration of taurine and caffeine, although the effects of taurine alone are unclear (77088). In healthy individuals, consumption of energy drinks containing taurine increased platelet aggregation and decreased endothelial function (77151,112268,112741). A case of cardiac arrest following strenuous exercise and an excessive intake of energy drinks containing caffeine and taurine has been reported (77136). In another case report, a 28-year-old male without cardiovascular risk factors presented to the hospital with radiating chest pain, shortness of breath, and diaphoresis after excessive intake of an energy drink containing taurine, caffeine, sugar, and glucuronolactone. Electrocardiogram findings confirmed myocardial infarction, and subsequent catheterization confirmed thrombotic occlusion (112741).

Endocrine ...Orally, taurine has been reported to cause hypoglycemia (77153).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, constipation has been reported following the administration of taurine (77231). Dyspepsia has also been reported after oral taurine use (104165).

Hematologic ...In clinical research, taurine reduced platelet aggregation (77245). A case of massive intravascular hemolysis, presenting with confusion, dark urine, dyspnea, emesis, and fever, has been reported following the administration of a naturopathic vitamin infusion containing taurine, free amino acids, magnesium, and a vitamin B and D complex (77177). However, the effects of taurine alone are unclear.

Immunologic ...A case report describes a hypersensitivity reaction in a female patient with a history of allergies to sulfonamides, sulfites, and various foods, after ingestion of taurine and other sulfur-containing supplements. The amount of taurine in the products ranged from 50-500 mg per dose. The allergic reaction recurred upon rechallenge with taurine 250-300 mg (91514).

Neurologic/CNS ...In a case study, encephalopathy occurred in a body-builder who took approximately 14 grams of taurine in combination with insulin and anabolic steroids. It is not known if this was due to the taurine or the other drugs taken (15536).
Cases of seizures following the consumption of energy drinks containing taurine have been reported (77105,77196). In clinical research, taurine has been reported to cause drowsiness and ataxia in epileptic children (77241).

Psychiatric ...In a case report, a 36-year-old male with adequately controlled bipolar disorder was hospitalized with symptoms of mania after consuming several cans of an energy drink containing taurine, caffeine, glucuronolactone, B vitamins, and other ingredients (Red Bull Energy Drink) over a period of four days (14302). It is unknown if this effect was related to taurine.

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...In human research, an exacerbation of pulmonary symptoms of cystic fibrosis has been associated with taurine supplementation, although this could also be caused by progression of the disease (77231).

Renal ...A case of acute kidney failure has been reported following the concomitant intake of 1 liter of vodka and 3 liters of an energy drink providing taurine 4. 6 grams, caffeine 780 mg, and alcohol 380 grams (77185).

(Read more about TAURINE)