Coral Complex 3 [Discontinued] by Coral

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for allergic rhinitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Atherosclerosis. Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for atherosclerosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Diarrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for diarrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Dyspepsia. Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for indigestion caused by hypochlorhydria, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Food allergies. Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for food allergies, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Gallbladder disease. Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for gallbladder disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Hyperhomocysteinemia. Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for hyperhomocysteinemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Hypothyroidism. Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for hypothyroidism, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose.
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although there has been interest in using oral betaine hydrochloride for RA, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical use of betaine hydrochloride for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate betaine hydrochloride for these uses.

(Read more about BETAINE HYDROCHLORIDE)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Boron deficiency. Oral boron treats and prevents boron deficiency. Details: Taking boron orally is effective for preventing and treating boron deficiency (7135).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Radiation dermatitis. Topical application of sodium pentaborate pentahydrate gel to radiation sites may reduce the risk of dermatitis in patients with breast cancer who are receiving radiotherapy. Details: A small clinical study in patients with breast cancer shows that applying a hydrogel containing sodium pentaborate pentahydrate 3% four times daily during radiotherapy for 5 weeks reduces the risk of moderate to severe dermatitis by 50% when compared with petroleum jelly (Vaseline). However, there is no difference in patient satisfaction (95660). Additionally, a larger clinical trial in patients with breast cancer shows that applying a sodium pentaborate pentahydrate 3% gel to radiation sites 15 minutes before each session for 25 sessions reduces the risk of dermatitis by 90%, erythema by 87%, dry desquamation by 92%, and moist desquamation by 97% when compared with a placebo gel (109557).
• Vaginal candidiasis. Boric acid applied intravaginally seems to reduce vaginal candidiasis. Details: Some limited clinical research shows that applying boric acid powder intravaginally 600 mg once or twice daily for up to 3 weeks can treat candidiasis and other vaginal fungal infections, including resistant and chronic infections (15443,15444,15446,15449,15450,15451,15453); however, this research is limited by low study quality. For Candida glabrata yeast infections, which are less prevalent than Candida albicans infections, some evidence shows that intravaginal boric acid capsules are effective in about 65% to 70% of azole-resistant infections; however, boric acid capsules appear to be less effective than intravaginal flucytosine (Ancobon) (15445,15454). For Candida krusei infections, which are rare and resistant to azole antifungal treatment, boric acid capsules also appear to be effective in some cases (15448).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral boron does not seem to improve athletic performance. Details: A small clinical study in male bodybuilders shows that taking boron 2.5 mg daily for 7 weeks does not increase lean body mass, muscle mass, or testosterone levels when compared with placebo (944). Furthermore, the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) does not recommend boron supplementation as a nutritional ergogenic aid due to a lack of supportive evidence (101009).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral boron is beneficial for age-related cognitive decline. Details: Two very small clinical studies in healthy older adults show that taking boron 3.25 mg daily for up to 49 days orally might improve cognitive function and fine motor skills when compared with lower amounts of boron (943).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral boron is beneficial for reducing pain during menstruation. Details: A small clinical study in young females with moderate to severe dysmenorrhea suggests that taking boron tetraborate 10 mg daily, starting two days before and continuing until three days after the start of menstruation for two menstrual cycles, reduces pain levels by 24% and pain duration by 1.5 hours, or 34%. Both pain and pain duration were decreased by only 9% in patients receiving placebo (95428).
• Kidney transplant. It is unclear if oral boron is beneficial in patients receiving a kidney transplant. Details: Observational research in kidney transplant recipients has found that higher boron intake, as measured by urinary boron levels, is associated with a lower risk of mortality when compared with lower intake. Patients with 24-hour urinary boron levels in the top tertile had a 49% lower risk of all-cause mortality when compared with those in the lowest tertile; however, there was no association with graft failure (109556). It is unclear if these findings can be generalized to boron supplements.
• Obesity. Although there has been interest in using oral boron for obesity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of boron for this purpose.
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral boron is beneficial for osteoarthritis symptoms. Details: Small low quality studies in patients with osteoarthritis suggest that taking boron tetraborate 3-6 mg daily for up to 8 weeks might improve pain and other symptoms when compared with a lower intake of boron (941,36870).
• Osteoporosis. It is unclear if oral boron is beneficial for osteoporosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in postmenopausal adults shows that taking boron 3 mg daily does not improve bone density when compared with placebo (36872).
• Periodontitis. Small clinical studies suggest that adding topical boric acid to scaling and root planing treatment may be beneficial in periodontitis. Details: A meta-analysis of four small clinical studies in 117 patients with periodontitis shows that using boric acid 0.75% gel or solution in addition to scaling and root planing seems to slightly improve probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) when compared with placebo or saline control (105690). Another small clinical study in patients with periodontitis shows that using boric acid 0.5% for irrigation in addition to scaling and root planing seems to improve CAL and PPD to a similar degree as using povidone-iodine 0.1% (105691). The available research was conducted in Turkey, Vietnam, and India; it is unknown if these findings are generalizable to other geographic locations. More evidence is needed to rate boron for these uses.

(Read more about BORON)

EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Oral calcium carbonate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an antacid. Details: Taking calcium carbonate orally as an antacid is effective for treating dyspepsia (1843). Calcium carbonate has FDA approval as an antacid.
• Hyperkalemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities. Details: Administering calcium gluconate intravenously can reverse electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias induced by hyperkalemia (12946). Intravenous calcium gluconate is FDA-approved for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities.
• Hypocalcemia. Oral calcium treats and prevents hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium is used to treat severe hypocalcemia. Details: Taking calcium orally is effective for treating and preventing hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate, acetate, gluceptate, or chloride is effective for severe hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany (12928).
• Kidney failure. Oral calcium carbonate or calcium acetate is used as a phosphate binder during kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium carbonate or calcium acetate orally is effective as a phosphate binder. Calcium acetate (PhosLo) appears to control hyperphosphatemia better than sevelamer (Renagel) (12943,12944,38990). Calcium citrate is not recommended for this purpose because it increases aluminum absorption and does not bind phosphate as efficiently as calcium acetate or calcium carbonate (21631). Some clinical research also shows that taking calcium orally reduces blood pressure in patients with kidney failure (975).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral calcium in combination with vitamin D prevents bone density loss that occurs during long-term treatment with corticosteroids. Details: Taking calcium in combination with vitamin D as adjunctive therapy seems to be effective for reducing bone mineral density loss in people using corticosteroids long-term (982,1046,1830,1831,1832,4462,4463,4464,4465,4466)(4467,12945,38493). One specific product used in clinical research is Oscal (Marion Merrel Dow Inc.), which contains elemental calcium 500 mg per tablet plus vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (982). Another product used is Oscal 250 + D (SmithKline Beecham Healthcare), which contains elemental calcium 250 mg and vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (1046).
• Hyperparathyroidism. Oral calcium reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium orally reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with kidney failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism (1827,1828,1829,39174,39425). In elderly women, the combination of calcium and vitamin D reverses secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces hip fracture risk (8818). Also, population research suggests increased calcium intake from the diet and supplements reduces the risk of primary hyperparathyroidism in women. Supplemental intakes of at least 500 mg/day and dietary intakes of approximately 1100 mg/day are considered to be protective (91353).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate calcium intake, from the diet and/or supplements, is recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate calcium intake in line with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) by age, along with adequate vitamin D intake, for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake when adequate dietary intake is not feasible (109425). In the US and Canada, foods containing at least 200 mg calcium with less phosphorous content than calcium can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate calcium intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (11940,102148). However, calcium supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Also, calcium supplements do not seem to be effective for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) during lactation (988), in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation (1817), or in patients who have had renal transplantation (4823,38736,38871). Maximal bone growth occurs in the teenage years, and then BMD in females remains relatively constant until age 30-40. After age 40, bone loss typically occurs at rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. In males, this occurs several decades later. Bone loss is more pronounced if dietary calcium intake is below the RDA, which is the case for many Americans (2571,2578). One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy children 7-14 years old shows that fortifying food with calcium 250-1000 mg daily for up to 24 months modestly improves femoral neck BMD, but not hip or spine BMD. However, the included trials did not supplement vitamin D (107232). During the 5 years immediately after menopause, calcium supplementation has very little effect on bone loss (2569,2570,2575,2576). The rapid loss of estrogen causes a high bone resorption rate, which increases serum calcium levels and therefore decreases intestinal absorption of calcium (2570). After this period, the typical rate of bone loss is 2% per year (2572,2576). Taking calcium 1000-1600 mg daily as carbonate, citrate, lactate gluconate, or citrate malate salt decreases this rate by 0.25% to 1% annually (977,979,981,2569,2571,2572,2575,2576,2578,6850)(38978,38980,39064). The greatest reductions (1% or more) are seen in the first 1-2 years of supplementation when bone remodeling foci can be filled (2569,2576). After this period, the differences in rate of loss between supplemented and non-supplemented females are closer to 0.25% per year (2569,2577). A meta-analysis of clinical evidence suggests that there is no additional benefit after 4 years (38980). Small clinical studies have found that continuous calcium supplementation at an average daily dose of 1050 mg, started after menopause and continued for 1.5-4 years, may reduce fracture rates by 26% when compared with no calcium supplementation. The largest of these studies was conducted in nursing home residents who also received daily vitamin D; the benefits of calcium, specifically, are unclear (39386). Some research also suggests that calcium and vitamin D improves primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in some older individuals with osteoporosis, particularly the elderly and those who are no longer community dwelling (12930,38875,38849,39026,109471). However, not all research is positive. One large clinical trial in elderly adults with a low-trauma fracture show that taking calcium 1000 mg daily with or without vitamin D 800 IU daily for 2-7 years does not reduce the risk of a second fracture when compared with placebo (13073). Another clinical study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 800 IU daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (less than 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). Also, some exploratory research suggests that supplements may need to be continued indefinitely; in adults over 68 years of age, any effects of 2 years of calcium supplements on BMD appear to be lost within 2 years after discontinuing supplements (6853). Calcium has additive effects when used with other agents such as vitamin D, estrogens, or calcitonin. Whereas calcium alone generally reduces or prevents loss of BMD, combination with other agents can produce small increases in BMD ranging from 0.3% to 3.3% depending on the combination and dosages used (978,980,1836,2570,2571,2572,2576). However, one meta-analysis in healthy adults shows that fortifying foods with calcium 250-1000 mg daily, in conjunction with vitamin D supplementation, for up to 24 months does not improve BMD when compared with control (107232). The full potential of osteoporosis treatments cannot be realized without adequate calcium intake (2569,2570,2571,2572). Advise patients taking agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene (Evista) to ensure that their daily calcium intake meets the RDA. Use supplements if necessary. The usefulness of calcium in preventing osteoporosis in males is not as well-studied. Some observational research has found that calcium 870 mg daily is not associated with changes in BMD and bone loss in males (97201). However, clinical evidence suggests that taking calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years might improve trabecular or cortical bone mass by 2% to 4% (980,8827,8873). Dietary supplementation with calcium and vitamin D seems to moderately reduce bone loss measured in the femoral neck, spine, and total body, and seems to reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in older patients with osteopenia or low BMD (980).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Adequate calcium intake seems to prevent symptoms of PMS. Details: There seems to be a link between low dietary calcium intake and symptoms of PMS (2004,6847,39007). Taking calcium 1000-1336 mg daily seems to significantly reduce depressed mood, water retention, and pain, especially if daily calcium intake is inadequate (1822,1823,1824,2004,95821). Calcium carbonate 1200 mg daily seems to decrease PMS symptom scores by about 18% when compared with placebo (1822). Increasing dietary calcium intake is also associated with a decreased risk of developing PMS. Consuming an average of 1283 mg of calcium per day from foods is associated with about a 30% lower risk of developing PMS compared with consuming an average of 529 mg daily (13094); however, taking calcium supplements does not appear to be associated with the risk of developing PMS.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Oral calcium seems to be beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer, especially in those with adequate vitamin D levels and normal body mass index (BMI). Details: Population studies have found that increased intake of dietary or supplemental calcium is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas (1047,8820,12120,38951,98898,98899). Clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research also show that taking calcium supplements 1.2-2 grams daily for up to 4 years can reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence by up to 29% (970,12118,12950,15267,34596,38718,39042,95817). However, not all research has been positive. Some meta-analyses of clinical research or observational studies suggest that taking calcium does not reduce the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer (34596,39042,39349). Other contradictory research suggests that postmenopausal females who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290); however, this finding may not be reliable due to the high baseline intake of calcium in study participants. The reason for these conflicting findings is not entirely clear. Vitamin D might be an important factor. People with lower than average vitamin D levels do not seem to get any benefit from calcium supplements (12118). Also, one meta-analysis of previous trials suggests that taking calcium 1200 mg daily reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas in people with a normal BMI, but not in those who are overweight or obese (99715). Despite this conflicting evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2005 stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence to support this claim (102366).
• Fetal bone mineralization. If calcium intakes are low during pregnancy, oral calcium seems to be beneficial for increasing fetal bone density. Details: With low dietary calcium intake (less than 562 mg elemental calcium daily) during pregnancy, calcium supplementation increases fetal bone mineralization and density. However, calcium supplementation does not offer any additional benefit if calcium intakes are adequate (3263,3264).
• Hypertension. Oral calcium seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount. However, it is unclear if this reduction is clinically significant. Details: Many clinical trials and observational studies show that intake of calcium supplements or dietary calcium modestly reduces blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension, usually around 1-2 mmHg. Calcium seems to be more effective for certain subpopulations of patients, such as salt-sensitive people and patients with low baseline dietary calcium intake (945,972,974,976,984,1818,1819,1820,1821,6852)(13138,14406,38803,39063,39094,39221). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium intake during pregnancy reduces systolic blood pressure in offspring by 1-2 mmHg (38852). However, a large-scale clinical trial in postmenopausal females shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg daily does not lower blood pressure or reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials shows that taking calcium in combination with vitamin D for up to 7 years has no effect on blood pressure (98861). The validity of this finding is limited by the poor methodological quality of the included studies. Some observational research suggests that calcium can reduce the risk for hypertension. Population research in females aged 45 years and older suggests that higher intake of calcium from both diet and supplement sources is linked to a lower risk of developing hypertension when compared to lower calcium intake (14265). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension. However, the FDA has concluded that this claim is based on supporting, rather than conclusive, evidence (102367).
• Osteomalacia. Oral calcium seems to reverse osteomalacia caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Osteomalacia is commonly caused by vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to osteomalacia in children and adults. Calcium supplementation can reverse osteomalacia caused by calcium deficiency. Along with appropriate vitamin D supplementation, individuals at risk of osteomalacia need sufficient calcium intake (94819).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral calcium seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia in high risk pregnancies, especially if calcium intakes are low. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (971,38756), most clinical research shows that taking calcium orally 1-2 grams daily reduces pregnancy-related hypertension and pre-eclampsia (973,1833,8828,39043,39319,39426,96480). Calcium appears to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia by about 50% when compared with placebo. One meta-analysis of 19 controlled trials involving over 29,000 pregnancies found that for every 19 females treated with calcium, one episode of pre-eclampsia would be avoided (96480). Calcium appears to have the greatest effect in individuals at high-risk of pre-eclampsia or with low calcium levels, and when taken at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation (15029,38497,96480,99714). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding the use of calcium supplements to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. However, due to the limited and conflicting research available at that time, the FDA stated that this outcome was highly unlikely. Since then, large, high-quality clinical research has supported this finding. In fact, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released a recommendation to prescribe oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancies at high risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary calcium intakes are low, in order to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).
• Rickets. Oral calcium seems to reverse rickets caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Rickets is commonly caused be vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to rickets. Calcium supplementation can reverse rickets caused by calcium deficiency (94819). A small clinical study in children with nutritional rickets shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily for 24 weeks improves radiographically measured rickets caused by calcium deficiency. Rickets seems to improve more rapidly with calcium 1000 mg compared to calcium 500 mg. However, increasing the calcium dose to 2000 mg daily is not more beneficial than calcium 1000 mg daily (98904).
• Tooth retention. Oral calcium with vitamin D seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral calcium does not seem to be beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Although some population research disagrees (15631,39041,95811,107237), most research shows that increased calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (15631,16715,98895,107236,107237). Subgroup analyses of population research suggest that calcium intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, adults (15631,107237). Another subgroup analysis in a large meta-analysis of population research also suggests that dietary intake may reduce estrogen receptor(ER)-negative breast cancer, but not ER-positive breast cancer (107236). However, most other research has not evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation or intake on breast cancer subtypes. The best evidence to date, from a large scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years after menopause does not reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer at the end of the study and 5 years after the end of the intervention (16715,98895).
• Fractures. Although oral calcium prevents fractures in osteoporosis, most evidence shows that calcium does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis discussion for more information on the use of calcium for this purpose. Details: The most recent and robust meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium supplementation with or without vitamin D is NOT associated with reduced fractures in older adults without osteoporosis (95822). A large-scale study in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years suggests calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D 400 IU daily for 7 years only modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) and does not significantly reduce fracture risk. This lack of effect may have been due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. In those who were 80% adherent, the combination of calcium plus vitamin D reduced the risk of hip fracture by about 29% (14282). Also, some clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 5 years does not attenuate loss of height after menopause when compared with placebo (95810). Additional meta-analyses of clinical and observational evidence suggest that calcium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, such as hip fractures (38589,38888,98895). Some other research has suggested that calcium in combination with vitamin D reduces fracture risk in older patients without osteoporosis (980,1836,8818,12930,12933,12952,38849,102145,107235); however, this research is confounded by a number of variables, including the presence of hormonal therapy and differing levels of fracture risk at baseline (1836,8818,95822). Conflicting findings on this topic might also be due to genetic differences in patient populations. A population analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study found that, in older females with the lowest genetic susceptibility to low bone mineral density (BMD), taking calcium with vitamin D is associated with a reduction in fracture risk. However, in females with a higher genetic susceptibility to low BMD, there is no association between supplementation and fracture risk. This might be because individuals with a lower susceptibility to low BMD are also more responsive to calcium and vitamin D supplementation (97357). As of April 2018, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with vitamin D >400 IU daily along with calcium >1000 mg daily is safe and effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture. USPSTF recommends against supplementing with calcium 1000 mg daily or less along with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal females (95695).
• Obesity. Oral calcium does not seem to improve weight loss. Details: Observational research has found that adults and children with low calcium intake are more likely to gain weight, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and be overweight or obese when compared to people with high calcium intake (12124,12125,12126,12127,14265). Additional observational research has found that increasing calcium intake is associated with weight loss in females; the results in males have been conflicting (12127,15602,15603). Despite these findings from observational research and a few small clinical studies (12128,15397,14438,98905), most clinical research has found that increased calcium intake does not increase weight loss (12052,13138,15396,15399,38985,39004,97356). The most recent meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies shows that daily dietary and supplemental calcium intake that meets the dietary reference intake (DRI) of 1000 mg or more daily does not increase weight loss in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when compared with intake below the DRI (95813). An older meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials also shows that increased dietary and supplemental calcium intake does not increase weight loss (15605).
• Overall mortality. Oral calcium does not seem to reduce overall mortality. Details: While some population research has found that calcium taken in combination with vitamin D in older females is associated with a lower risk of death (97353), most evidence shows that calcium, with or without vitamin D, has no effect on all-cause mortality (93533,97308).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral calcium does not reduce the risk of developing CVD and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Clinical research shows that calcium does not decrease CVD risk. Several separate meta-analyses of clinical and population research involving over 50,000 patients show that taking calcium 600-1200 mg daily for up to 7 years does not reduce the risk of CVD-related outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or overall mortality (39018,91350,92994,93533,97308,98902,107231,107233). No association was found between total dietary or supplemental calcium intake with or without vitamin D and the risk of CVD or mortality (91350,93533,97308). In fact, some population and clinical research has found that when calcium is used alone or with vitamin D, there is an INCREASED risk of CVD and coronary heart disease (38077,107233). However, other clinical research disagrees (93533). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease by 1.1-1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Intravenous calcium does not prevent nerve pain in patients given oxaliplatin. Oral calcium has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: While pooled analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials suggest that calcium and magnesium infusion decreases the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials shows that the infusion has no effect in preventing neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). Additionally, clinical trials show that administering calcium gluconate 1 gram with magnesium sulfate 1 gram intravenously immediately before, or before and after, the administration of a single oxaliplatin cycle (90005), or over the entire 6-cycle course of oxaliplatin, does not improve symptoms of neurotoxicity when compared with placebo (96474).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral calcium does not prevent MI. When taken in the absence of vitamin D, oral calcium may increase the risk of MI. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of calcium is associated with a decreased risk of MI (91350). However, a 2010 meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking calcium at a dose of at least 500 mg daily is associated with an approximate 30% INCREASE in the risk of MI in patients over the age of 40. According to this analysis, one additional case of MI will occur for every 69 patients that take calcium for 5 years (17482). A more recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of MI by 1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research studied postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233) In contrast, other meta-analyses of clinical research have shown that taking calcium for up to 7 years is NOT associated with an increased risk of MI, including a meta-analysis that only included postmenopausal females (93533,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI in postmenopausal females (93533). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for alcohol use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 800 mg and vitamin D 200 IU orally daily for 14 days modestly reduces alcohol craving scores and withdrawal scores when compared with placebo in adults with alcohol dependence that are undergoing withdrawal. Taking calcium carbonate did not reduce the need for diazepam; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (107234).
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for atherosclerosis. Details: A population study has found that taking calcium 1.2 grams daily for 3 years has no effect on carotid intima thickness or carotid atherosclerosis incidence. A total calcium intake (dietary and supplemental) of at least 1794 mg daily in older females may be associated with a decreased risk of carotid atherosclerosis when compared with a total calcium intake below 1010 mg daily (97351).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the odds of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. Details: A small observational study found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a 52% reduced odds of an autism spectrum disorder in the offspring (98900).
• Cancer. Oral calcium alone does not seem to prevent cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Taking calcium alone does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of cancer (12118,15629). The role of calcium in cancer prevention when taken along with vitamin D is controversial, as conflicting results exist. One clinical trial shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1400-1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1100 IU daily have a 60% lower relative risk for developing cancer of any type. Approximately 25 postmenopausal females would need to take this combination for 4 years to prevent one occurrence of cancer (15629). However, a more recent clinical study shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of cancer at 4 years (93943). Reasons for the disparate results are not entirely clear. The discrepancies do not appear to be related to baseline vitamin D levels or different study populations. It is possible that, given the 10-year time lapse between the two publications, the discrepancies result from differences in cancer detection capability. Also, since cancer risk was a secondary outcome measure in the earlier study and a primary outcome measure in the more recent study, it is possible that the discrepancies result from differences in statistical methodologies. The effect of vitamin D and calcium on cancer risk in males and younger patients is not known. There is also interest in using calcium for reducing the risk of hematological malignancies. An analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU for up to 10 years is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of hematologic malignancies when compared with placebo. However, no effect on hematologic malignancy related mortality was seen (97354).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between a higher dietary intake of calcium and the risk of depression when compared with a lower dietary intake of calcium (96480).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for type 2 diabetes prevention. Details: Some population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet or supplements, alone or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713,96473). However, population research is often limited by confounding variables. For example, one analysis found that any beneficial effect might be influenced by concomitant magnesium intake (96473). Furthermore, other population research has found that serum calcium levels higher than 9.6 mg/dL are associated with greater risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults with osteoporosis. This study is limited because it was not determined whether increased serum calcium was due to increased calcium intake or another factor such as parathyroid function (95815).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing pain associated with dysmenorrhea. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg with vitamin D 5000 IU daily for three menstrual cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (95821). However, calcium carbonate 1000 mg taken alone seems to reduce pain when compared with placebo.
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but dietary calcium does not seem to have any effect (38893).
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing falls. Details: Research suggests that calcium in combination with vitamin D, but not calcium alone, might prevent falls by decreasing body sway and normalizing systolic blood pressure (6362,11939,39038). Some experts think the combination of calcium and vitamin D may be important (11916). Preliminary clinical research in adults residing in a health care facility shows that taking vitamin D supplements while increasing dietary calcium and protein for 2 years reduces falls by 11% when compared with standard diets. Intervention diets were supplemented with milk, yogurt, and cheese to provide calcium 1142 mg and protein 69 grams daily (107235). There might also be different effects in females compared to males. In one study, females aged 65 years or older who took vitamin D 700 IU plus calcium citrate 500 mg daily over a 3-year period had a 46% lower risk of falling. However, this combination did not decrease falls in males (14291).
• Fluorosis. Oral calcium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking calcium orally, in combination with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and vitamin D, seems to be effective for reducing excessive fluoride levels in children and improving symptoms of fluorosis in children aged 6-12 years (990).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral calcium in combination with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing heart failure. Details: Based on a secondary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), taking calcium 1000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily does not reduce the risk of heart failure in the overall population or in individuals at high risk. However, in a subgroup of postmenopausal females without risk factors for heart failure, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of developing heart failure by about 37% (97307).
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for hypercholesterolemia. Details: Some evidence shows that taking calcium carbonate 400 mg three times daily reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4% and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 4% after 6 weeks of treatment when used in combination with a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) (2557). In contrast, a study in females with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 800 mg daily for 2 years might INCREASE total cholesterol levels by about 12 mg/dL when compared with placebo. This same study showed an association between calcium supplementation and an increase in total cholesterol levels and carotid intimal thickness in postmenopausal females, but not premenopausal females (97350). A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials which included both healthy patients and patients with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily and vitamin D 200-7142 IU daily modestly improves HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplementation is more effective in patients with dyslipidemia at baseline. It is unclear if this effect is due to calcium, vitamin D, or the combination (107227). However, other research shows that taking a specific supplement containing calcium 600 mg plus vitamin D 200 IU (Caltrate 600 D, Wyeth Consumer Healthcare Inc.) twice daily in combination with calorie restriction does not reduce total or LDL cholesterol levels when compared with placebo (15601).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing blood levels of lead. Details: Lead is mobilized along with calcium from bone during pregnancy and lactation, resulting in increased serum concentrations of lead. One clinical study suggests that calcium supplementation does not significantly decrease these elevated lead concentrations (1586). However, another clinical study suggests that taking calcium reduces blood lead levels by 11% when compared with placebo, with greatest effects observed in those with high baseline levels of lead (38957).
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral calcium for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of calcium for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium alone or with vitamin D is beneficial for metabolic syndrome prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet and supplements alone, or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713).
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing nephrotic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium 500-1000 mg daily for 3 months in combination with vitamin D3 60,000 IU daily or weekly for 4 weeks has no effect on bone mineral density or the risk of relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (97355).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking calcium alone or with vitamin D3 1000 IU daily reduced the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but had no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma (104622).
• Oral mucositis. When used in combination with fluoride treatments, a calcium phosphate mouth rinse seems to prevent and reduce mucositis-related pain in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that using a particular mouth rinse (Caphosol, EUSA Pharma) containing calcium phosphate, in combination with fluoride treatments, reduces days of mucositis, the duration of pain, and the dose and days of morphine used when compared with placebo and fluoride treatment (38611).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: An older meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (38792). However, a more recent pooled analysis of 15 cohort and case-control studies has found that the highest intake of dietary or dairy calcium is associated with a 20% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared to the lowest intake (97349).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing postpartum depression risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium 2 grams daily beginning at 11-21 weeks gestation reduces depression at 12 weeks postpartum when compared with placebo. However, no benefit is seen at 6 weeks postpartum (39447).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing leg cramps during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking calcium 1 gram twice daily (as a mixture of salts) for 2 weeks can reduce pregnancy-related leg cramps during the second half of pregnancy when compared with no treatment (2567).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily might decrease the risk of developing prostate cancer (14133). However, some epidemiological research suggests that consuming very high doses of calcium, over 2000 mg daily, might actually increase the risk of developing prostate cancer (14134). Some epidemiological research also suggests that doses greater than 1500 mg daily increase the risk of poorly differentiated, clinically advanced, and fatal prostate cancer (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer (98894). However, contradictory research suggests that there is no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall risk of prostate cancer (14131,14132,104630).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Some population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke (4822,38678). However, other population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is not associated with a decreased risk of stroke (91350). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years does not affect the risk of stroke when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females, and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Vertigo. Oral calcium with vitamin D might reduce positional vertigo; the effect of calcium when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking calcium 500 mg and vitamin D 400 IU twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate calcium for these uses.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Chromium deficiency. Oral or parenteral chromium is effective for the treatment and prevention of chromium deficiency. Details: Taking chromium orally is effective for preventing and treating symptoms of chromium deficiency, including hyperglycemia, glycosuria, sudden weight loss, peripheral neuropathy, and confusion (7135).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Diabetes. Oral chromium seems to be modestly beneficial for improving glycemic control in diabetes, especially when used in doses greater than 200 mcg daily and in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. It is unclear if chromium helps to prevent the development of diabetes. Details: Epidemiological research has found that lower toenail chromium levels are associated with an increased risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease (11908). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed a qualified health claim stating that chromium picolinate may reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes. However, the FDA has determined that any relationship between chromium picolinate and type 2 diabetes is highly uncertain and is based on limited scientific evidence (102362). Research on the use of chromium for the TREATMENT of type 2 diabetes is conflicting but seems to show modest benefit in some patients. Many small clinical studies show that taking chromium orally decreases fasting blood glucose, postprandial glucose, insulin, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels, and increases insulin sensitivity (6867,7137,12390,15169,14440,42628,42638,95097,103745). However, other small clinical studies show that chromium is no better than placebo for improving glycemic indices in patients with diabetes (7060,14325,42679,42707,90059,103746,103749). Some of these studies may not have been adequately powered and some had a high risk of bias. Furthermore, these studies had high heterogeneity related to study population and size, chromium supplementation duration, formulation, and dose, and accepted standards of diabetes care. Multiple meta-analyses pooling results of these small clinical trials also show mixed results (90055,90063,95098,105026,110610). The most recent and comprehensive meta-analyses show that chromium picolinate lowers HbA1C by about 0.6%; while it is unclear if chromium yeast, chromium dinicocysteinate, or chromium with biotin or other natural ingredients are beneficial. Chromium seems to be most beneficial in doses of greater than 200 mcg taken for 12 weeks or longer, and in patients with poorly controlled diabetes with a baseline HbA1C of 8% or greater (90063,105026). There is also speculation that chromium might primarily benefit patients with low chromium levels; however, there has not been an analysis specifically evaluating this population (6867,7058,13725,14325,95098). Some research suggests that chromium might also modestly improve lipid levels in patients with type 2 diabetes (1934,6867,95098). A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials including patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking chromium 42-1000 mcg orally daily for 5-26 weeks decreases triglyceride levels by 7 mg/dL and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 2 mg/dL when compared with control. Taking chromium did not affect low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. However, the validity of these results is limited by high heterogeneity (110605). In addition, some meta-analyses have failed to demonstrate any effects of chromium on lipid levels (110610). A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials including patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking chromium 200-1000 mcg orally daily for 8-25 weeks lowers diastolic blood pressure by 2 mmHg, but not systolic blood pressure or body mass index, when compared with placebo (110607). Preliminary clinical research shows that chromium picolinate might improve metabolic parameters in patients with other forms of diabetes as well. This includes those with type 1 diabetes (1935), diabetes secondary to corticosteroid use (5039,42829), and gestational diabetes (42817).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Hypertension. Meta-analyses of small clinical trials suggest that oral chromium does not lower blood pressure by a clinically meaningful amount. Details: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in adults with different metabolic disorders shows that taking chromium 42-1000 mcg orally daily for 12-24 weeks does not lower systolic or diastolic blood pressure when compared with placebo (110609). A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in adults with different chronic disorders shows that taking chromium 42-1000 mcg orally daily for 4-25 weeks lowers systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 3 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, when compared with placebo. However, the validity of this meta-analysis is limited by high heterogeneity (110604). Another meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials including patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking chromium 200-1000 mcg orally daily for 8-25 weeks lowers diastolic blood pressure by 2 mmHg, but not systolic blood pressure, when compared with placebo (110607). In addition, the validity of these results is limited by inclusion of patients with and without hypertension at baseline (110604,110607,110609).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (Prediabetes). Oral chromium does not seem to improve glycemic indices in patients with prediabetes. Details: Some clinical research shows that adults with impaired glucose tolerance do not have improved glycemic parameters or insulin sensitivity after taking chromium picolinate 500-1000 mcg daily for up to 6 months when compared with placebo (13053,42670). Likewise, a small clinical study in elderly patients with impaired glucose tolerance shows that chromium supplements do not improve glucose tolerance or triglyceride or cholesterol levels when compared with placebo (13722). Finally, a preliminary clinical study in overweight or obese adults with prediabetes shows that taking two capsules of a combination product containing chromium, cinnamon, and carnosine (Glycabiane, PiLeJe) daily for 4 months decreases fasting plasma glucose by approximately 4 mg/dL when compared with placebo, but does not improve fasting plasma insulin, measures of insulin sensitivity or resistance, or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) (94234). The small effect on fasting plasma glucose is clinically insignificant and may be due to the other ingredients in this product.
• Schizophrenia. Oral chromium does not seem to improve psychological measures in patients with schizophrenia. Details: Clinical research in patients with schizophrenia shows that taking chromium polynicotinate 400 mcg daily for 3 months does not affect weight or mental status when compared with placebo (42613).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Antiretroviral-induced insulin resistance. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial for preventing antiretroviral-induced insulin resistance. Details: Preliminary clinical research in HIV patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) shows that taking chromium nicotinate 200 mcg or chromium picolinate 1000 mcg daily for 8-16 weeks may help decrease insulin resistance and increase glucose disposal when compared to baseline (42630,42662). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if chromium enhances athletic performance, although some research suggests that it may improve body composition when used in conjunction with exercise. Details: One large clinical study shows taking chromium 400 mcg daily, in conjunction with resistance training, can increase weight loss, body fat loss, and lean body mass when compared with placebo and resistance training (6868). However, other, very small clinical studies show that adding chromium picolinate or chromium chloride 177-400 mcg daily to a weight-training program does not improve body composition when compared with weight-training alone (6860,6861,6862,42747). These studies may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference in outcomes.
• Atypical depression. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with atypical depression. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with atypical depression shows that taking chromium picolinate 400 mcg daily for 2 weeks followed by 600 mcg daily for an additional 6 weeks improves response and remission rates when compared with placebo (10309). However, other clinical research shows that taking elemental chromium 400 mcg in the form of chromium picolinate daily for 2 weeks followed by 600 mcg daily for an additional 6 weeks does not improve most symptoms of atypical depression, although appetite and sexual drive may improve, when compared with placebo (42600).
• Beta blocker-induced dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with dyslipidemia due to beta-blocker use. Details: One small clinical study in patients who take beta-blockers shows that taking glucose tolerance factor (GTF)-chromium 600 mcg daily for 2 months increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 16%, but does not affect other lipid parameters, when compared with placebo (5040).
• Binge eating disorder. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with binge eating disorder. Details: One small clinical study in overweight adults with binge eating disorder shows that taking chromium picolinate 600 or 1000 mcg by mouth daily for 6 months does not affect binge eating frequency, body weight, or depressive symptoms when compared with placebo (90057).
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with treatment-resistant, rapid-cycling bipolar disorder shows that taking chromium chloride (Hypo-A Chrom, Hypo-A GmbH) 600-800 mcg daily for up to 2 years can decrease the frequency of affective episodes by approximately three episodes annually when compared to baseline (42618). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Cognitive impairment. It is unclear if oral chromium prevents cognitive impairment. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking chromium picolinate standardized to contain elemental chromium 1000 mcg daily for 12 weeks does not improve memory or depression in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment when compared with placebo. However, results from neuroimaging scans suggest that chromium increases the activity of certain regions of the brain during memory tasks when compared with placebo (42666).
• Hyperlipidemia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral chromium may modestly reduce lipid levels in patients with hyperlipidemia. Details: One small clinical study in patients with atherosclerotic disease shows that taking chromium 250 mcg as chromium chloride daily for 7-16 months decreases triglycerides and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, but not other lipid parameters, when compared with placebo (7060). Other small clinical studies in adults with hyperlipidemia show that taking chromium picolinate 200 mcg daily for 6 weeks, chromium polynicotinate 200 mcg twice daily, or brewer's yeast containing 48 mcg elemental chromium daily for 6-8 weeks decrease total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when compared to baseline (37178,42585,42710). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of comparison with a control group. A meta-analysis of small heterogeneous clinical studies in patients mostly without hyperlipidemia shows that taking chromium orally does not affect lipid levels when compared with placebo (105029). A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials including patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking chromium 42-1000 mcg orally daily for 5-26 weeks modestly improves triglyceride and HDL cholesterol levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with control. However, the validity of these results is limited by high heterogeneity and inclusion of patients with and without hyperlipidemia (110605). In addition, some meta-analyses have failed to demonstrate any effects of chromium on lipid levels in adults with diabetes (110610). Limited research has tested high-dose chromium in children. One small clinical study in children with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking chromium polynicotinate 400-600 mcg with glucomannan 1000-1500 mg twice daily for 8 weeks reduces total and LDL cholesterol when compared to baseline (90061). It is unclear if this effect is due to chromium, glucomannan, or the combination. Finally, chromium does not seem to reduce lipid levels in people without hyperlipidemia.
• Hypoglycemia. It is unclear if oral chromium helps to reverse or prevent hypoglycemia. Details: One very small clinical study in patients with reactive hypoglycemia shows that taking chromium chloride 200 mcg daily for 3 months increases blood glucose levels and improves insulin binding and hypoglycemic symptoms following an oral glucose load (6859). Another small clinical study in patients with symptomatic hypoglycemia shows that taking chromium yeast (Biochrome, Pharma-Nord) 125 mcg daily for 3 months improves symptoms, including chilliness, trembling, and disorientation, when compared with baseline (42711). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with metabolic syndrome. Details: One small clinical study in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that taking a particular chromium picolinate product (Chromax, Nutrition 21) 500 mcg twice daily for 16 weeks does not affect weight, waist circumference, insulin sensitivity, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C), or lipid levels when compared with placebo (42654).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). It is unclear if oral chromium helps to prevent MI. Details: Epidemiological research has found that low toenail chromium concentrations are associated with an increased risk of MI (13728). However, toenail chromium concentrations might not be a reliable predictor of body stores of chromium. There is also no reliable research showing that chromium supplements can prevent MI.
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral chromium slows NAFLD progression. Details: One small clinical study in patients with NAFLD shows that taking chromium picolinate 200 mcg two times daily after meals for 12 weeks does not affect liver enzyme levels or body weight when compared with placebo (105027).
• Obesity. Although some research suggests that oral chromium may increase weight loss, this increase in weight loss is not likely to be considered clinically relevant. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical studies in overweight or obese adults show that taking chromium picolinate 200-1000 mcg daily for 12-16 weeks might result in a cumulative weight loss of about 0.5-1 kg when compared with placebo (90062,90065). However, this small reduction in weight is unlikely to be considered clinically significant. Furthermore, certain small clinical studies in healthy, overweight or obese adults and children show that taking oral chromium 200-1000 mcg daily for 6-24 weeks does not reduce weight when compared with control (6860,13727,17224,42680). Some of these studies may not have been adequately powered to detect a smaller effect. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials including patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking chromium 200-1000 mcg orally daily for 8-25 weeks does not lower body mass index when compared with placebo. However, the validity of these results is limited by inclusion of patients with and without obesity at baseline (110607).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral chromium improves symptoms of PCOS. Details: One small clinical study in patients with PCOS shows that taking chromium picolinate 1000 mcg daily for 6 months along with diet and exercise counseling decreases body mass index and improves rates of ovulation and regular menstruation when compared with placebo (95094). Also, some clinical research shows that taking chromium picolinate (21st Century HealthCare, Inc. or Nature Made) 200 mcg daily orally for 8 weeks increases insulin sensitivity when compared with placebo (95095,98687). However, other preliminary clinical research shows that taking chromium picolinate 200 mcg daily for 4 months does not affect insulin sensitivity or improve ovulation rates (42603). Although chromium picolinate at doses of less than 1000 mcg might have very small effects on fasting glucose, these doses do not seem to have clinically beneficial effects on fasting glucose, pregnancy rate, or testosterone levels (95094,95095,98687). A lower dose of chromium has also been studied in combination with carnitine. One small clinical study in overweight adults with PCOS shows that taking chromium picolinate 200 mcg daily with carnitine 1000 mg daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces fasting blood glucose, insulin resistance, and body weight, and slightly increases insulin sensitivity, when compared with placebo (103747). However, it is unclear if this benefit is clinically significant. Additionally, it is unclear if these effects are due to chromium, carnitine, or the combination. Carnitine has demonstrated clinical benefit when used alone in PCOS.
• Turner syndrome. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with this condition. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking brewer's yeast 30 grams containing chromium 50 mcg daily for 8 weeks might improve abnormalities in glucose and lipid metabolism when compared with baseline in patients with Turner syndrome, a genetic disorder that has a high incidence of diabetes (13729). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. More evidence is needed to rate chromium for these uses.

(Read more about CHROMIUM)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Copper deficiency. Oral or intravenous copper is beneficial for treatment of copper deficiency. Details: Taking copper orally or intravenously is effective for treating copper deficiency and anemia due to copper deficiency. Copper deficiency is rare. It is seen most commonly in people receiving prolonged parenteral nutrition (7135). Oral cupric sulfate has been used in doses up to 0.1 mg/kg daily (7135). Copper 1-2 mg per day in parenteral nutrition solution has also been used (505).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Alzheimer disease. Oral copper does not seem to be beneficial for Alzheimer disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking copper orotate dihydrate, providing 8 mg of elemental copper, daily for 12 months does not improve scores on evaluation scales for Alzheimer disease when compared with placebo (45949). There is also some concern that copper could have detrimental effects. Observational research has found that people with Alzheimer disease have higher levels of copper in their blood than people without the disease (95917); the clinical significance of this finding is unclear.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Oral copper has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific combination product containing copper (NicAzel, Elorac Inc.) 1-4 tablets daily for 8 weeks reduces inflammatory lesions in patients with inflammatory acne when compared with baseline. Other ingredients in this product include nicotinamide, azelaic acid, zinc, pyridoxine, and folic acid; specific quantities are not known (90800). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although there is interest in using oral copper for CVD prevention, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of copper for this purpose.
• Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). It is unclear if compression stockings containing copper are beneficial for lipodermatosclerosis in patients with CVI. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that using compression stockings impregnated with copper for 8 weeks does not improve overall symptoms of lipodermatosclerosis secondary to chronic venous disease when compared with using a compression stocking without copper. However, the affected surface area may be reduced by approximately 16% by 2 weeks when copper-impregnated compression stockings are used (101809).
• Dental plaque. It is unclear if rinsing the mouth with copper is beneficial for reducing dental plaque. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that rinsing the mouth with a solution of copper 1.1 mmol/L for 4 days decreases plaque accumulation when compared with a placebo solution (46006).
• Diarrhea. Oral copper has only been evaluated in combination with zinc; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children 6 months to 5 years of age presenting to a hospital in India with acute watery or bloody diarrhea shows that taking a solution providing zinc 2 mg/kg and copper 0.2 mg/kg orally daily for 2 weeks does not reduce the duration of diarrhea, the weight of stool, or the need for rehydration when compared with placebo (87166). It also does not seem to reduce the recurrence of diarrhea or improve weight gain over the next 3 months (95540).
• Osteoarthritis. Although there is interest in using topical copper for osteoarthritis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of copper for this condition.
• Osteoporosis. Oral copper has only been evaluated in combination with other minerals; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in postmenopausal adults shows that taking copper 2.5 mg in combination with zinc 15 mg, manganese 5 mg, and calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years can slow bone loss when compared with taking either calcium or the trace minerals alone (1994).
• Postoperative infection. It is unclear if copper-impregnated wound dressings are beneficial for the prevention of postoperative infection. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that using a wound dressing impregnated with copper oxide 3% by weight reduces the incidence of a surgical site infection in the 30-day period following a caesarean section by 39%, but does not reduce length of hospital stay or readmission rate, when compared with a non-copper wound dressing. Eight patients would need to be treated with the copper-impregnated dressing to prevent one infection (105363). This study is limited by the use of a telephone questionnaire to assess the suspicion of infection.
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral copper is beneficial for improving symptoms of SLE. Details: Copper status does not appear to be associated with the risk of SLE (101810). Additionally, one small clinical study shows that taking copper 3 mg daily, alone or in combination with fish oil, for 24 weeks does not affect symptoms of SLE when compared with placebo (12953).
• Tinea pedis. Although there is interest in using topical copper for tinea pedis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of copper for this condition.
• Wound healing. It is unclear if topical copper sulfate can improve the healing of umbilical granuloma. Details: A small clinical study in children 1-3 months of age with treatment-naïve umbilical granuloma shows that a single application of copper sulfate to the affected site results in complete resolution in 70% of patients, compared with 90% of patients receiving topical sodium chloride twice daily for 5 days. Some patients who received a second application of copper sulfate experienced full healing; however, it is unclear if this was due to the treatment or natural resolution (109403). More evidence is needed to rate copper for these uses.

(Read more about COPPER)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Iodine deficiency. Oral iodine supplements, including iodized salt, are effective for improving iodine status and reducing goiter size in adults and children. Iodine supplementation is also recommended during pregnancy in areas at risk for iodine deficiency. Details: Iodine deficiency is associated with several adverse outcomes. The earliest clinical symptom of iodine deficiency is low circulating thyroid hormone and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), followed by thyroid goiter (7135,16747,91398). Iodine deficiency and subsequent hypothyroidism can lead to anovulation, infertility, autoimmune thyroiditis, and gestational hypertension. Iodine deficiency is also associated with increased risk of thyroid cancer (16747). Clinical research shows that taking iodine supplements, including iodized salt, improves iodine status and reduces goiter size in adults with iodine deficiency (16747,55919,103071). Studies also show that taking iodine supplementation, including iodized salt, in areas of endemic iodine deficiency, reduces goiter size in children (16747,55919). When taken during pregnancy for iodine deficiency, iodine supplements and iodized salt reduce both maternal and newborn thyroid size and thyroglobulin; however, the effect on maternal TSH is inconsistent (91399,103070). Although some clinical studies and one analysis show that perinatal use of iodine has no effect on the incidence of thyroid disorders during pregnancy (91399,97240,97241), one analysis shows that iodine supplementation reduces the risk of postpartum hyperthyroidism by 68% when compared with placebo (97240). Taking iodine supplementation before 12 weeks' gestation appears to be more effective than when taken later in pregnancy. Perinatal iodine supplementation has no effect on preterm birth rate (97240,97241). Evidence is limited to females with mild-moderate iodine deficiency; the routine use of iodine supplementation during pregnancy has not been extensively studied. For example, the effect of perinatal supplementation on newborn neurocognitive development is conflicting and the evidence is generally low quality (55976,97241,105880,108706). Despite the limited evidence, iodine supplementation is recommended in areas at risk of deficiency.
• Radiation exposure. Oral potassium iodide prevents thyroid uptake of radioactive iodine. However, it does not protect against other sources of radiation. Details: Taking potassium iodide is effective for preventing the uptake of radioactive iodine by the thyroid (7517,7518). Doses of potassium iodide protect for about 24 hours. Therefore, it should be taken daily until the risk of radiation exposure no longer exists (17575,17576).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Conjunctivitis. Ophthalmic povidone-iodine solution seems to reduce the risk of conjunctivitis in infants. It may also improve the resolution of acute conjunctivitis in adults. It is unclear if it is beneficial in patients with adenoviral conjunctivitis. Details: A meta-analysis of low-quality clinical trials shows that povidone-iodine solutions are more effective than silver nitrate for preventing neonatal conjunctivitis. However, povidone-iodine solutions are not more effective than erythromycin or chloramphenicol (56084). Povidone-iodine in combination with dexamethasone also seems to be helpful in adults. A clinical trial in patients with acute viral conjunctivitis shows that applying povidone-iodine 0.6% with dexamethasone 0.1% four times daily for 4 days improves clinical symptoms and eradiation of viral counts when compared with placebo control (103075). A small clinical study in adults with adenoviral conjunctivitis shows that administering 4-5 drops of a povidone-iodine 5% eye drop solution within 4 days of symptom onset decreases viral load, mucoid discharge, and bulbar edema and redness on day 4 of a 21-day follow-up period, but at no other time points, when compared with a single dose of artificial tears (108705). Due to the single-dose nature of this study, the effects of continued administration are unclear.
• Diabetic foot ulcers. Topical iodine seems to help with the management of diabetic foot ulcer wounds. Details: A small clinical study in patients with diabetic foot ulcers shows that topically applying cadexomer iodine ointment (Iodosorb) for 12 weeks seems to improve healing to a similar degree as using standard treatment with gentamicin solution, streptokinase, and/or dry saline gauze (2200).
• Endometritis. Topical application of iodine prior to cesarean delivery seems to reduce the risk of endometritis. Details: A meta-analysis of eight clinical trials shows that vaginally applying povidone-iodine 1% to 10% solution immediately before cesarean delivery reduces the risk of post-cesarean endometritis by 62% when compared with saline or no cleaning. It also reduces postoperative fever by 13% and wound infection by 23% (99794). These findings are consistent with other meta-analyses (56080,103076). There seems to be no difference in benefit whether povidone-iodine 1%, 5%, or 10% is used. A network meta-analysis of clinical studies in patients having cesarean delivery suggests that povidone-iodine is no better at preventing endometritis than using chlorhexidine or metronidazole; however, there may not have been sufficient power to detect a difference (103076).
• Fibrocystic breast disease. Oral iodine seems to reduce breast pain in patients with fibrocystic breast disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with fibrocystic breast disease shows that taking sodium iodide, protein bound iodide, or molecular iodine for 6 months or longer improves mastalgia and reduces breast nodules when compared with baseline or control. Molecular iodine in doses of 70-90 mcg/kg appears to be more effective and better tolerated than the other forms (2197). Another clinical study in patients with cyclic mastalgia due to fibrocystic breast disease shows that taking tablets containing molecular iodine 3000-6000 mcg daily for 5 months reduces pain, tenderness, and nodularity in patients with cyclic mastalgia when compared with placebo. However, a lower dose of 1500 mcg daily does not appear to be beneficial (55960).
• Oral mucositis. Rinsing the mouth with a povidone-iodine solution may prevent oral mucositis from radiochemotherapy. Details: Small clinical studies in patients receiving radiation and chemotherapy for cancer shows that using an oral povidone-iodine rinse seems to reduce the risk for oral mucositis when compared with using sterile water (2198,2199).
• Periodontitis. Rinsing with povidone-iodine solution in addition to scaling and root planing seems to be modestly beneficial in patients with periodontitis. Details: A meta-analysis of mostly small clinical studies in patients with chronic periodontitis suggests that rinsing with povidone-iodine 0.1% to 10% during scaling and root planing modestly reduces the periodontal pocket depth when compared with rinsing with water or saline solution (56072).
• Postoperative infection. Povidone-iodine antisepsis prevents postoperative infection when compared with inactive controls such as normal saline and water. However, it is unclear how it compares to active controls such as chlorhexidine; practice guidelines are conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intraoperative application of povidone-iodine reduces the risk of surgical site infection by approximately 40% when compared with saline or no irrigation (56088). However, research comparing povidone-iodine with other antiseptics such as chlorhexidine is conflicting, as are official guidelines for surgical antisepsis. Many of these discrepancies seem to be related to the presence or absence of alcohol in the preparation. A meta-analysis of clinical research comparing aqueous or alcohol-based povidone-iodine shows that using alcohol-based chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis is more effective for preventing postoperative surgical site infections and may be associated with a lower overall positive culture rate. However, since evidence for both aqueous and alcohol-based solutions of povidone-iodine were included in this study, it is unclear if this may have affected outcomes (108710). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guideline recommends chlorhexidine solution as the first choice for preparing the skin for surgery, with povidone-iodine solution as a second-line option. The antiseptic solutions are recommended to be alcohol-based as long as the surgical site is not near a mucous membrane (105906). The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines also recommend alcohol-based chlorhexidine solutions over either alcohol-based or aqueous povidone-iodine for preventing surgical site infections. However, some experts have expressed concern that these recommendations are based on faulty evidence, as some studies used povidone-iodine preparations with lower alcohol amounts than their comparator groups (105898). In fact, the guideline from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) does not differentiate between povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine antiseptic solutions as long as they are alcohol-based (105905).
• Thyroid storm. Oral iodine is recommended as an adjunct to standard treatment for thyroid storm. Details: The American Thyroid Association (ATA) and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) recommend a multimodality approach for treating thyroid storm that includes taking five drops of a saturated solution of potassium iodine every 6 hours (15,92699).
• Thyroid nodules. Combining oral iodine with thyroxine seems to improve the resolution of thyroid nodules. Details: A clinical study in patients with benign nodular thyroid disease and possible iodine deficiency shows that taking iodized salt 200 mcg daily in addition to thyroxine 1.5 mcg/kg daily after surgery seems to reduce the size of the thyroid remnant by 40%, compared with a 10% reduction in patients given thyroxine alone (55927). Also, one large clinical trial in patients with nodular goiter shows that taking potassium iodide 150 mcg daily in combination with levothyroxine 50-100 mcg daily for 12 months reduces nodule volume by about 17%, compared with 7% in the group using levothyroxine alone (91392).
• Venous leg ulcers. Topical cadexomer iodine seems to improve the healing of venous leg ulcers; however, it is unclear if applying povidone-iodine is beneficial. Details: A meta-analysis of four small clinical studies in patients with venous leg ulcers shows that applying cadexomer iodine results in complete healing of ulcers in 33% of patients after 4-12 weeks, compared with only 15% of patients receiving standard care alone. However, use of cadexomer iodine was associated with more adverse effects than standard care. Furthermore, preliminary clinical research shows that applying cadexomer iodine is comparable to hydrocolloid dressing, paraffin gauze dressing, dextranomer, and silver-impregnated dressings for improving the rate of complete healing. A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research show that povidone-iodine has comparable healing rates when compared with amoxicillin, hydrocolloid dressings, and moist or foam dressings (99798). These findings were consistent with an older version of this meta-analysis (56076).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Catheter-related infections. Topical povidone-iodine seems to be less effective than chlorhexidine for preventing infections from intravascular catheters. Furthermore, it does not seem to reduce the risk of catheter-related urinary tract infections. Details: One meta-analysis of clinical research shows that topical application of povidone-iodine reduces the risk of bloodstream infections when applied at the insertion site of hemodialysis central venous catheters (55883). However, disinfecting catheter insertion sites using povidone-iodine seems to be less effective for preventing blood stream infections in patients receiving central venous, pulmonary artery, or peripheral artery catheters when compared with chlorhexidine solutions (55883,55916). In addition, periurethral cleansing with povidone-iodine 10% prior to bladder catheterization, as well as bladder irrigation with povidone-iodine 2% prior to urinary catheter removal, does not seem to reduce the risk of urinary tract infections when compared with placebo (56058,56126).
• Prematurity. Maternal iodine supplementation does not seem to impact neurological development in premature infants. Details: A meta-analysis of two clinical trials in premature infants shows that adding iodine to enteral or parenteral feeds does not improve mental, visual, or auditory development or reduce the risk of death when compared with no iodine supplementation (99797).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Chyluria. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with chyluria. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chyluria suggests that using povidone-iodine 0.2% solution as a sclerosant in renal pelvic instillation sclerotherapy (RPIS) may be as effective as using silver nitrate 1% (55970).
• Corneal ulceration. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with corneal ulceration. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that administering povidone-iodine 2.5% eye drops every two hours for two weeks in addition to standard antibiotic therapy does not reduce visual impairment in patients with corneal ulcers when compared with standard antibiotic therapy alone (55971).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if rinsing with a povidone-iodine mouthwash and using a povidone-iodine nasal spray and ointment can reduce the spread of COVID-19. Details: A small clinical study in adults with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 shows that orally swishing and gargling 25 mL of povidone-iodine (PI) 1% solution, then, into each nostril, spraying 2.5 mL of PI 1% solution and applying one dab of PI 10% ointment, and repeating this 4 times daily for 5 days does not seem to alter the quantity of viral RNA over time when compared with control (105877). The validity of this finding is limited because all study participants achieved negative viral titers on the third day of the study.
• Cutaneous sporotrichosis. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with cutaneous sporotrichosis; research is conflicting. Details: Anecdotal reports and case series suggest that taking saturated solution of potassium iodide (SSKI) orally is effective for most patients when used alone or in combination with another antifungal, including terbinafine or itraconazole (17562,17563,17564,17565,17566,17567,17568,17569,17570,17571) (17572,17573). In one non-controlled clinical study, treatment with SSKI, starting with 3 drops (150 mg potassium iodide) daily and titrating up, resulted in symptom resolution in about 90% of patients after about 33 days of treatment (17561). However, some patients are not able to take SSKI due to intolerable side effects (17561,17572).
• Hyperthyroidism. It is unclear if oral potassium iodide is beneficial for patients with Graves' disease undergoing total thyroidectomy. Details: A retrospective study in patients with Graves' disease undergoing total thyroidectomy shows that preoperative administration of saturated solution of potassium iodide (SSKI) 5% does not reduce the rate of postoperative complications, such as transient or permanent hypoparathyroidism, transient recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy, definitive RLN palsy, and cervical hematoma, when compared with no preoperative administration (108707).
• Infant development. It is unclear if maternal iodine supplementation impacts neurological development in infants. Details: Three-year follow-up data from a clinical study in infants and breastfeeding females shows that maternal supplementation of iodine 150 mcg daily improves child cognitive scores, but does not affect language or motor scores, when compared with placebo. Supplementation with a higher dose of 300 mcg daily yielded similar cognitive, language, and motor scores as the 150 mcg dose (108706). This finding aligns with the daily recommended dietary allowance (RDA) of 290 mcg during lactation, which is sometimes achieved by augmenting the diet with a 150-mcg iodine supplement (7135).
• Postoperative bleeding. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with postoperative bleeding. Details: A small clinical study suggests that irrigating extraction sockets with povidone-iodine 1% stops bleeding in a greater number of patients following tooth extraction when compared with a saline solution (56011).
• Rhinosinusitis. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with rhinosinusitis. Details: A small prospective cohort study in patients with recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis has found that using a povidone-iodine 0.08% nasal rinse every other day for 7 weeks in addition to standard therapy improves symptoms and reduces signs of infection when compared with baseline (103074). However, one small clinical study in patients with a history of sinus surgery and acute exacerbations of chronic sinusitis shows that receiving povidone-iodine nasal irrigations twice daily for 30 days is no different than irrigations with mupirocin or normal saline for improving nasal symptoms. However, mupirocin tended to reduce bacteria count to a greater extent than the povidone-iodine solution (105878). This finding is limited due to small study size and potential lack of power to detect differences between groups.
• Thyroid cancer. It is unclear if dietary iodine is associated with complications in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. Details: A retrospective study in patients in China with papillary thyroid cancer has found that dietary intake of iodine resulting in serum concentrations greater than 90 mcg/L is associated with a 75% increased risk of cervical lymph node metastases when compared with concentrations less than 45 mcg/L (108708). Actual dietary intake of iodine was not reported, limiting the validity of this finding.
• Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). It is unclear if oral iodine rinse is beneficial for the prevention of VAP. Details: A small clinical study in patients with severe head trauma suggests that regularly rinsing the throat with 20 mL of povidone-iodine 10% solution decreases the risk for VAP when compared with using a saline rinse (56003).
• Wound healing. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial for wound healing. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that topical iodine, as cadexomer iodine or povidone-iodine, is superior to non-antiseptic dressings and some antiseptic agents, such as silver sulfadiazine, for reducing wound size. However, iodine seems to be less effective than local antibiotics such as rifamycin (56083). More evidence is needed to rate iodine for these uses.

(Read more about IODINE)

EFFECTIVE

• Anemia of chronic disease. Oral and intravenous iron in combination with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are effective for treating anemia of chronic disease. Details: Iron supplementation with ESAs is effective for treating anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or chemotherapy. During therapy with ESAs, iron levels should be monitored and supplementation provided as needed to ensure that the response is not limited by lack of iron for erythropoiesis (1087,1091,20110,20111,110192). Research shows that intravenous iron appears to be more effective than oral supplements for this purpose (20112,20113). In patients with CKD, intravenous iron at total doses from 2232 mg over 6 months to 1020 mg over one week increases hemoglobin levels more than oral doses of 4-6 mg/kg daily or 325 mg daily for up to 6 months (20112). Some research has evaluated the effect of intravenous or oral iron in patients not treated with ESAs. In patients with cancer or CKD, oral iron supplements have been shown to improve iron status (110184,110192). However, overall benefits of iron alone remain unclear in treated or untreated patients with cancer and more research is needed to rule out an increase in mortality and to determine any effect on blood transfusion requirements (110192). Preliminary clinical research shows that children aged 6 months to 10 years with HIV and anemia who take elemental iron 3 mg/kg daily along with a multivitamin for 3 months have a 41% lower chance of having persistent anemia at 3 months when compared with multivitamins alone (95432).
• Iron deficiency anemia. Oral and intravenous iron are effective for treating or preventing iron deficiency anemia. The benefits of iron supplementation in people with iron deficiency without anemia are unclear. Details: Oral iron supplements, mainly as ferrous sulfate, are effective for treating and preventing iron deficiency anemia in adults, children, and infants (1089,7135,17495,17496,17497,103806,20114,20115,91183,96621)(104680,104681). Other forms are also effective, including sodium iron ethylenediaminetetra-acetate (NaFeEDTA), iron(III)-hydroxide polymaltose complex (IPC), iron protein succinylate, iron bisglycinate, and lactoferrin with iron (20117,20118,110189). Treatment with iron supplements should increase hemoglobin levels by 1 gram/dL every 2-3 weeks. However, even after hemoglobin has normalized, it may take up to 4 months for iron stores to be replenished (17497). Historically, treatment of iron deficiency anemia with oral iron supplements has typically consisted of a daily dosing regimen, often taken in divided doses to reduce adverse effects. In more recent years, however, intermittent iron supplementation (1-3 doses/week) has become preferred for some patients, particularly those with mild anemia, due to better absorption and a possible reduction in side effects compared to daily dosing. One small clinical study shows that taking ferrous sulfate 60 mg on alternate days in single doses improves iron absorption when compared to once daily dosing (96630). However, for patients with severe anemia, twice daily dosing may be preferred to alternate day dosing due to faster response. A small clinical study in patients with iron deficiency anemia shows that taking ferrous sulfate 200 mg twice daily is more effective at increasing hemoglobin levels by 3 weeks when compared with ferrous sulfate 400 mg taken on alternate days in single doses (102864). A small clinical study in females with iron-deficiency anemia shows that fractional iron absorption is 40% to 50% higher with alternate-day dosing compared with daily dosing. Furthermore, total iron absorption was shown to be similar for alternate day dosing of elemental iron 200 mg compared with daily dosing of 100 mg, but the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects may be lower for the alternate day dosing regimen (101514). A meta-analysis of 25 clinical trials, including 10,996 menstruating females with or without pre-existing iron deficiency and/or anemia, shows that intermittent iron reduces the risk of anemia and increases hemoglobin and serum ferritin when compared with placebo or no intervention. This meta-analysis did not identify differences in the risk of anemia, hemoglobin, or serum ferritin between intermittent and daily iron supplementation. However, it did show that females receiving intermittent dosing had a 59% reduction in the risk for adverse effects. The validity of these findings is limited by significant heterogeneity in the enrolled populations and selected dosing strategies, including frequency of intermittent dosing, total weekly dose, and duration of follow-up. In addition, the subgroup analyses performed by baseline anemia, hemoglobin, and serum ferritin, as well as duration of follow-up, showed differing overall conclusions when comparing intermittent and daily iron supplementation. While intermittent dosing appears to be beneficial when compared with daily dosing for some patients with iron deficiency anemia, intermittent dosing may be less effective than daily iron supplementation in some patients (103806). Blood transfusion may be required for some patients with severe iron deficiency anemia who have symptoms such as dyspnea and fatigue (17497). Intravenous iron should be considered in patients who cannot tolerate oral iron or in patients with chronic bleeding or intestinal malabsorption (17497). Guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology recommend treatment with iron while awaiting investigations to rule out gastrointestinal issues in adults in the absence of an alternative explanation. The guidelines recommend ferrous sulfate, fumarate, or gluconate as one tablet daily. If adverse effects occur, intake can be reduced to once every other day, or alternative oral or parenteral sources of iron can be used. Parenteral sources should be used if oral sources are contraindicated or ineffective. Treatment should be monitored and continued after hemoglobin levels are normalized (110193). Iron supplementation may also be beneficial in patients with iron deficiency without anemia, which can cause fatigue and reduced well-being, although guidelines are lacking. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in adults with iron deficiency but not anemia shows that supplemental iron improves iron stores and hemoglobin levels. In addition, iron moderately reduces self-reported fatigue, but not physical capacity, when compared with placebo. Oral ferrous sulfate was used in most studies included in the analysis; however, intravenous or intramuscular iron were also used (104684).
• Pregnancy-related iron deficiency. Oral iron is effective for preventing pregnancy-related iron deficiency. Details: Clinical research shows that taking iron orally at an average daily dose of 20-225 mg of elemental iron increases maternal hemoglobin levels by up to 1 gram/dL when compared with placebo and reduces the risk of maternal anemia by 62% to 100% (20122,20123,20124,110180,110188). Some clinicians may recommend alternating days of iron administration to reduce gastrointestinal adverse effects. A pooled analysis shows that taking iron supplements on alternating days during pregnancy maintains adequate iron intake and reduces gastrointestinal adverse effects when compared with taking iron daily (96625). Various forms of oral iron seem to be equally effective for raising hemoglobin levels (110185,110188). However, in patients with anemia during pregnancy, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose were more effective than oral ferrous sulfate for improving hemoglobin levels (110185).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Breath-holding attacks. Oral iron seems to be effective for reducing the frequency of breath-holding attacks in children with iron deficiency. Details: The incidence of breath-holding attacks is increased in children with iron deficiency or iron deficiency anemia. Most research shows that oral supplementation with ferrous sulfate 3-6 mg/kg daily for 4-16 weeks reduces the frequency of breath-holding attacks in children aged 1-72 months (20128,104682,104683). The best evidence comes from a meta-analysis of one randomized controlled trial and 11 observational single arm studies (104682). In this analysis, approximately 84% of children experienced at least a 50% decreased frequency of breath-holding attacks (104682). Some preliminary clinical research also shows that administering intramuscular iron reduces the frequency of breath-holding attacks and increases remission in children with iron deficiency anemia (20128).
• Cognitive function. Oral iron seems to be effective for improving cognitive function in children and adolescents with iron deficiency. Details: Taking iron orally seems to improve cognitive function in iron-deficient children and adolescents (20121). For example, ferrous sulfate 650 mg twice daily for 8 weeks improved verbal learning and memory in non-anemic iron-deficient adolescent females (1095). Ferrous sulfate 50 mg twice weekly for 16 weeks appeared to improve attention measures in adolescent females with possible anemia (91186). Iron also appears to reverse developmental and learning deficits caused by iron-deficiency in anemic infants (1104). Some clinical research is focused on children and adolescents from low- and middle-income countries. In children aged 5-19 years with or without iron-deficiency anemia, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that iron supplementation for 3-8 months dose-dependently improves measured intelligence by a modest amount. However, there was no effect on other measures of cognition, including attention or memory (110181).
• Heart failure. Intravenous iron seems to be effective for improving recovery in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency. It is unclear if oral iron is effective. Details: Up to 20% of heart failure patients have iron deficiency (17499). Individual clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research in patients with heart failure show that administering intravenous iron, as ferric carboxymaltose, iron dextran, iron isomaltoside, or iron sucrose, for at least 12 weeks modestly improves quality of life, increases exercise capacity, and reduces hospitalizations when compared with placebo. However, there was no effect on all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality (17498,91179,110176,110187). Some individual clinical trials have used intravenous ferric carboxymaltose 200 mg or iron sucrose 200 mg in patients with mild or moderate heart failure and iron deficiency (17498,91179). Guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology suggest that treatment with parenteral iron improves symptoms and quality of life in patients with functional iron deficiency related to CHF (110193). Limited research has investigated the effect of oral iron in this population. A small meta-analysis of clinical research shows with low certainty that taking iron orally has beneficial effects on serum ferritin and left ventricular ejection fraction (110178). Most research shows that taking oral iron does not improve hemoglobin levels, quality of life, or exercise capacity when compared with placebo (100970,110178). However, one small clinical trial shows that taking oral iron modestly improves iron status and overall symptoms and increases the 6-minute walking distance by about 46 meters, compared with a reduction of only 14 meters in those taking placebo (110183). Some doses used in individual clinical studies have included iron polysaccharide 150 mg twice daily for 16 weeks and ferrous sulfate 200 mg three times daily for 12 weeks (100970,110183).
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). Oral and intravenous iron seem to be beneficial for RLS. The American Academy of Neurology recommends a combination of oral ferrous sulfate and vitamin C or intravenous ferric carboxymaltose for patients with RLS. Details: RLS is commonly associated with iron deficiency anemia. Some clinical research shows that taking iron in the form of ferrous sulfate 325 mg twice daily for 12 weeks reduces RLS symptoms comparably to pramipexole. Symptoms such as leg discomfort, need to move, and sleep disturbances improved considerably in about half of the patients taking either treatment (91181). Additional clinical research shows that taking ferrous sulfate 325 mg twice daily along with vitamin C 100 mg twice daily for 12 weeks reduces symptoms of RLS when compared with vitamin C alone in patients with RLS and low-normal serum ferritin levels (94189). Based on these results, clinical practice guidelines by the American Academy of Neurology report that taking this combination of oral ferrous sulfate and vitamin C is likely to improve symptoms in patients with RLS and low-normal serum ferritin (93587). Intravenous iron may also reduce symptoms of RLS. Clinical practice guidelines by the American Academy of Neurology report that two doses of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose 500 mg given 5 days apart are likely to improve symptoms and quality of life within 28 days in patients with moderate to severe RLS, regardless of serum ferritin levels. Intravenous iron sucrose has also been evaluated in patients with RLS, but there is currently insufficient available evidence to support or refute the use of this form of iron for treating RLS (93587).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral iron does not seem to improve athletic performance. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in adults of childbearing age shows that iron supplementation improves some exercise performance measures, such as maximal oxygen uptake capacity, but not others, such as time until exhaustion and energy consumption, when compared with control (91184). Another meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with iron deficiency without anemia shows that iron supplementation improves subjective measures of fatigue, but does not improve exercise time to exhaustion or other measures of physical capacity (104684). A small clinical study in healthy children shows that taking iron supplements or consuming food providing iron 30-200 mg daily for 1-2 months improves running performance when compared with placebo. This was demonstrated by reductions of heart rate of 6.6 to 8 beats per minute during the running exercise. One preliminary study included in this analysis also showed that iron supplementation improved treadmill endurance time (20140).
• Child growth. Oral iron does not seem to be beneficial for child growth. Details: Meta-analyses of mainly preliminary clinical research show that oral iron supplementation, at doses averaging 2-80 mg or 1-10 mg/kg elemental iron daily for up to 52 weeks, does not increase growth rate in children (20131,20132,20133,95434).
• Preterm labor. Oral iron does not seem to prevent preterm labor and may actually increase the risk in malaria-endemic regions. Details: A meta-analysis of results from five clinical studies shows that maternal intake of iron as ferrous sulfate 20-60 mg daily for 14-26 weeks starting in the second trimester of pregnancy does not affect the length of gestation or increase birthweight of the infant (95434). In females from a malaria-endemic area who have never been pregnant before, another clinical study shows that taking ferrous gluconate 60 mg and folic acid 2.8 mg weekly, starting before conception and continuing to the first antenatal visit, may more than double the risk of preterm birth, defined as a delivery under 37 weeks gestation, when compared with folic acid alone (100969). Some research suggests that the adverse outcome in this latter study may be explained by a rise in hepcidin levels in pregnant patients with malaria. Hepcidin is a hormone that regulates iron absorption and distribution, and malaria can upregulate hepcidin. High levels of hepcidin can decrease iron absorption, stimulate inflammatory processes, and cause progesterone withdrawal, leading to preterm labor (102863).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• ACE inhibitor-induced cough. It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial in patients with this condition. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking ferrous sulfate 256 mg daily reduces or eliminates cough induced by ACE inhibitors such as captopril (Capoten), enalapril (Vasotec), lisinopril (Prinivil, Zestril), and others, when compared with placebo (7307).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial in children with ADHD. Details: Three small clinical studies in children with ADHD and iron deficiency shows that taking oral iron improves some measures of ADHD after 1-3 months of treatment when compared with baseline or placebo. These studies used ferrous sulfate 5 mg/kg daily, ferrous sulfate 80 mg daily, ferrous fumarate 200 mg daily for children weighing up to 30 kg, or ferrous fumarate 400 mg daily for children weighing more than 30 kg (1093,16013,110191).
• Child development. It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial for improving development in non-anemic children. Details: Some observational research has found that iron deficiency in infancy is associated with poor verbal performance and social skills in childhood (102862). It is unknown whether iron supplementation can ameliorate these developmental issues. In non-anemic infants and children, preliminary clinical research shows that iron does not improve cognitive performance; the evidence for the benefits of iron on psychomotor development is conflicting (20129,20130,91315,96616,96626).
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial for esophageal cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that taking iron supplements is associated with a 32% lower risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma when compared to never taking iron supplements. However, use of iron supplements is not associated with a lower risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (95435).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial in patients with fatigue due to iron deficiency without anemia. Details: A meta-analysis of mainly preliminary clinical research in adults with iron deficiency without anemia shows that iron reduces self-reported fatigue moderately more than placebo (104684). A specific ferrous sulfate supplement (Tardyferon; Pierre Fabre Médicament) providing 80 mg of elemental iron daily for 4-12 weeks was used in two studies included in this analysis (11406,91188).
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In patients with active IBD, intravenous iron may be more beneficial than oral iron due to impaired absorption. However, it may also increase the risk of infection in these patients. Details: Since the absorption of oral iron may be impaired in patients with active symptoms of IBD, guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology suggest that treatment with parenteral iron may be needed in patients with IBD who have moderate to severe iron-deficiency anemia (110193). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research in this population shows that administering IV iron, usually as iron sucrose or ferric carboxymaltose, increases the risk of infection by 73% when compared with oral iron or no iron (110186).
• Postoperative recovery. It is unclear if intravenous iron is beneficial for recovery following cardiac surgery. Details: A meta-analysis of low- to moderate-quality clinical research in patients with preoperative iron-deficiency anemia shows that treatment with intravenous iron before cardiac surgery does not improve the rate of transfusions or the length of stay in the intensive care unit or hospital when compared with control groups, including placebo, oral iron, or no treatment. Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous iron does not reduce postoperative mortality rates (110182).
• Postpartum depression. Although there has been interest in using iron for postpartum depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of iron for this condition.
• Prematurity. Enteral iron seems to be beneficial for some measures of development in preterm infants. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in preterm or low birthweight infants fed human milk shows that enteral iron supplementation increases linear growth and reduces the risk of anemia when compared with control groups receiving no iron supplementation. However, there was no effect on serum ferritin, weight, head circumference, cognitive development, risk of infection, or risk of necrotising enterocolitis (110177). Additional clinical research in infants born at 24-28 weeks' gestation shows that a higher average enteral iron dose by 60 days of age is positively associated with cognitive performance at 2 years of corrected age. However, this association was not present for iron doses received at 90 days of age (110190). More evidence is needed to rate iron for these uses.

(Read more about IRON)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for alcohol use disorder, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral low-dose lithium is beneficial for preventing cognitive decline associated with Alzheimer disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking lithium gluconate or lithium carbonate 300 mcg once daily for 15 months prevents cognitive decline when compared with placebo, with benefits becoming apparent at 3 months (105350).
• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for ALS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Anorexia nervosa. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for anorexia nervosa, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Asthma. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for ADHD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Autism spectrum disorder. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for autism spectrum disorder, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Bipolar disorder. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for bipolar disorder, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Bulimia nervosa. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for bulimia nervosa, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Cancer. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Cognitive impairment. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for cognitive impairment, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this purpose.
• Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS). Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for CVS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Depression. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Diabetes. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Epilepsy. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for epilepsy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Headache. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for headache, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this purpose.
• Huntington disease. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for Huntington disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Hyperthyroidism. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for hyperthyroidism, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Meniere disease. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for Meniere disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Parkinson disease. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for mania associated with levodopa treatment in patients with Parkinson disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Schizophrenia. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for schizophrenia, as well as neutropenia related to antipsychotic use in patients with schizophrenia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for these conditions.
• Seborrheic dermatitis. Although there is interest in using topical lithium for seborrheic dermatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium for this condition.
• Tardive dyskinesia. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for tardive dyskinesia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition.
• Tourette syndrome. Although there is interest in using oral lithium supplements for Tourette syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lithium supplements for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate lithium supplements for these uses.

(Read more about LITHIUM)

EFFECTIVE

• Bowel preparation. Various magnesium salts are used for cleansing the bowel prior to procedures such as colonoscopy. Details: Various magnesium salts, including citrate, hydroxide, oxide, and sulfate, are ingredients in bowel preparation products available over-the-counter or by prescription only.
• Constipation. Magnesium salts are effective when used orally to treat constipation short-term. It is unclear if magnesium is beneficial for chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC). Details: Magnesium citrate, sulfate, and hydroxide salts are commonly used as laxatives. Magnesium citrate 8.75-25 grams has been used; magnesium hydroxide 2.4-4.8 grams, as 30-60 mL of milk of magnesia, has also been used (15). Magnesium sulfate, which seems to have the most potent effect, has been used as 10-30 grams (15,6430). Magnesium salts should only be used for occasional treatment of constipation, and doses should be taken with a full 8-ounce glass of water. There is also interest in using magnesium for symptomatic relief of CIC. A small clinical study in patients with CIC who are not taking chronic medications shows that taking magnesium oxide 1.5 grams in three divided doses daily for 28 days increases spontaneous bowel movements when compared with placebo (104397). It is unknown if magnesium is beneficial for CIC when used long-term.
• Dyspepsia. Magnesium salts are effective when used orally as antacids. Details: Magnesium carbonate, hydroxide, oxide, or trisilicate salts are used orally as antacids to reduce symptoms of gastric hyperacidity or gastroesophageal reflux. Magnesium hydroxide has the fastest onset of action. The onset for magnesium carbonate is slower due to its crystal structure. Magnesium trisilicate has the slowest onset and longest duration of action due to poor solubility (6844). Doses used include magnesium hydroxide 400-1200 mg (5-15 mL of milk of magnesia) up to four times daily, or magnesium oxide 800 mg daily (15).
• Eclampsia. Magnesium sulfate is considered the drug of choice for control of seizures. Details: Intravenous (IV) and/or intramuscular (IM) magnesium sulfate is considered the agent of choice for seizure prophylaxis during eclampsia by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) (15,12591,12592,61012,61184). Typical doses include 4-6 grams of magnesium sulfate by IV infusion in 250 mL of dextrose 5% or normal saline solution, followed by 4-5 grams of magnesium sulfate IM every 4 hours, or 1-3 grams per hour by continuous IV infusion. Doses should be adjusted according to serum levels and urinary excretion, and should not exceed 30-40 grams of magnesium sulfate daily (15,12591). Meta-analyses of clinical research show that treatment with IV or IM magnesium reduces the risk of seizure recurrence by 33% to 69% when compared with phenytoin, and by 47% to 60% when compared with diazepam (19960,60818,60954,60964,61105). One preliminary clinical study shows that lower doses of IV magnesium sulfate (9 grams loading dose and maintenance of 2.5 grams every 4 hours for 24 hours) are as effective as higher doses (14 grams loading dose and maintenance of 5 grams every 4 hours for 24 hours) for reducing the recurrence of eclamptic seizures (89383). It is generally recommended that treatment be continued for at least 24 hours after the last seizure (15). Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for eclampsia.
• Hypomagnesemia. Hypomagnesemia can be effectively treated with oral or parenteral magnesium. Details: Taking magnesium orally or parenterally is helpful for treating and preventing hypomagnesemia associated with alcoholism, cirrhosis of the liver, congestive heart failure (CHF), severe or prolonged diarrhea or vomiting, kidney dysfunction, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), pancreatitis, malabsorption syndromes, and other conditions (6280,6281,8088,8089). The dose and salt of magnesium for oral replacement therapy should be chosen carefully to avoid causing diarrhea. The gluconate and chloride salts cause less diarrhea, while the oxide salt is more likely to cause diarrhea and should be avoided. Magnesium chloride should also be avoided due to poor solubility which decreases absorption (6430,8099,10664). Orally, magnesium sulfate 3 grams every 6 hours for four doses has been used for hypomagnesemia (15). Parenteral magnesium doses must be individualized according to serum magnesium levels, but a typical starting dose for mild deficiency is 1 gram of magnesium sulfate intramuscularly (IM) every 6 hours for 4 doses (15). For more severe deficiency, 5 grams of magnesium sulfate may be given as an intravenous (IV) infusion in 1 liter of dextrose 5% or normal saline solution over 3 hours (15).
• Pre-eclampsia. Magnesium sulfate is considered the drug of choice for seizure prophylaxis in patients with pre-eclampsia. Details: Intravenous (IV) and/or intramuscular (IM) magnesium sulfate is considered the agent of choice for seizure prophylaxis during pre-eclampsia by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) (12591,12592,61012,61184). Some meta-analyses show that IV administration of magnesium sulfate reduces the risk of eclampsia when compared with placebo, phenytoin, or diazepam in patients with pre-eclampsia (19960,60818,60960,60979). A typical initial dose is 4-5 grams of magnesium sulfate by IV infusion in 250 mL of dextrose 5% or normal saline solution, followed by 4-5 grams of magnesium sulfate IM every 4 hours, or 1-3 grams of magnesium sulfate per hour by continuous IV infusion. Doses should be adjusted according to serum levels and urinary excretion, and should not exceed 30-40 grams of magnesium sulfate daily (15,12591). The optimal duration of prophylaxis has not been determined. A meta-analysis suggests that using a shorter duration of 12 hours or less is not associated with an increase in risk of eclamptic seizures when compared with regimens of 24 hours or longer (108732). However, studies are likely underpowered due to the low incidence of eclampsia. Oral magnesium has been evaluated for the prevention of pre-eclampsia in healthy adults, but taking magnesium citrate 300 mg daily, starting at 12-20 weeks' gestation and continuing until delivery, does not reduce the incidence of pre-eclampsia when compared with placebo (103724).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Cerebral palsy. Most evidence shows that antenatal magnesium reduces the risk of cerebral palsy in preterm infants, although there are some inconsistent results. Details: Most clinical studies and meta-analyses show that antenatal magnesium sulfate reduces the risk of cerebral palsy by about 32% and the risk of motor dysfunction by about 45% in preterm infants (60882,60915,60927,60931,61001,97485,103734,103754). However, some studies have inconsistent results (8093,19998,98293,98295). The lowest effective dose of magnesium sulfate seems to be 4 grams intravenously, with or without a maintenance dose of 1 gram/hour until birth or for 24 hours. In obese females, a higher dose, based on body weight, may be needed (97485,97495,103734,103754). Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for this purpose.
• Seizures. Intravenous magnesium sulfate is used for treating seizures of various etiologies. Details: Intravenous magnesium sulfate may be useful for controlling seizures associated with epilepsy, glomerulonephritis, hypothyroidism, and acute nephritis in children (15). Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for this purpose.
• Torsades de pointes. Intravenous magnesium sulfate is the first-line treatment for torsades de pointes after measures to correct precipitating factors have been unsuccessful. Details: Intravenous magnesium sulfate has been used successfully to treat the life-threatening ventricular tachycardia, torsades de pointes (15,6844). The Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines of the American Heart Association recommend a dose of 1 to 2 grams diluted in 50-100 mL Dextrose 5% solution given IV over 5-60 minutes, followed by a continuous IV infusion of 0.5-1 gram/hour.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Arrhythmia. Magnesium sulfate is effective for the specific type of ventricular tachycardia known as torsades de pointes, and seems to be helpful for treating other types of arrhythmias. Evidence for the role of oral or intravenous magnesium in preventing postoperative arrhythmias is conflicting. Details: Administering magnesium intravenously or orally may be helpful for treating atrial and ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, and supraventricular tachycardia (9497,13352,13354,13355,13356,60804,60829,60877,61113). Arrhythmias associated with congestive heart failure have been treated with magnesium sulfate 8 grams infused over 12 hours (9497). For rate control in atrial fibrillation, magnesium sulfate 2.5 grams IV over 20 minutes, followed by 2.5 grams IV over 2 hours has been used (13356). For paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, single doses of 1-4 grams of magnesium chloride have been used (13352). For atrial tachycardia, 2 grams of magnesium sulfate in 10 mL of dextrose 5% solution has been given IV over 1-10 minutes, followed by 5-10 grams of magnesium sulfate in 250-500 mL dextrose 5% solution as an IV infusion over 5 hours (13354,13355). Research on the effects of intravenous magnesium for preventing arrhythmias after cardiac surgery is conflicting. Some clinical trial meta-analyses show that intravenous magnesium reduces the risk of atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias, or supraventricular arrhythmias following cardiac surgery by 23% to 48% when compared with placebo (60814,60826,60828,60838,61008,61033,61181,97487,97490). Doses of magnesium sulfate used include 30 mg/kg in 500 mL normal saline (97490), or 80-100 mg/kg added to the cardioplegia solution (97487). Also, one small study in adults after CABG surgery suggests that taking magnesium hydroxide 1600 mg orally reduces arrhythmia as effectively as receiving magnesium sulfate 2000 mg intravenously (99315). However, other meta-analyses that only include higher-quality trials show that magnesium supplementation does not reduce the risk of ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmias following cardiac surgery (61010,61024,61031,105081).
• Asthma. Parenteral magnesium sulfate can help to reverse severe acute asthma attacks and reduce the need for hospital admission. Oral or nebulized magnesium, however, does not seem to be beneficial. Details: Overall, a single dose of intravenous magnesium seems to improve pulmonary function in acute asthma exacerbation and reduce the risk of hospitalization, particularly in patients with severe asthma, and those who have failed initial treatment with nebulized albuterol and intravenous corticosteroids (60888,90023,96483,104398,107365). The typical dose used for adults is 2 grams of magnesium sulfate infused over 20 minutes (15). For children, 25-75 mg/kg, to a maximum of 2 grams, infused over 20-30 minutes has been used (15,96483,107365). However, a post-hoc analysis of one large clinical trial (104400) designed to assess nebulized magnesium in children with acute asthma has found that adding IV magnesium to nebulized magnesium is associated with greater odds of hospitalization when compared with no IV magnesium (105919). This post-hoc analysis did not differentiate between precautionary and necessary hospitalizations. Although some clinical research in patients with acute asthma exacerbation shows that nebulized magnesium in combination with albuterol significantly improves airway function when compared with albuterol alone, the benefit is not likely to be clinically relevant (90016). Most evidence, including larger clinical trials, has not shown benefit of adjunct nebulized magnesium for acute asthma in adults or children (60888,90002,96484,104400,105920). Oral magnesium also does not seem to be beneficial. A meta-analysis of small clinical trials in children and adults with asthma shows that taking magnesium supplements orally does not improve lung function or reduce bronchodilator use when compared with control (104404).
• Colorectal cancer. Increasing dietary magnesium intake seems to lower the risk of colon cancer but not rectal cancer. Details: Epidemiological research shows that increased dietary magnesium intake is associated with a reduced risk of colon cancer, but the risk of rectal cancer is not affected (89387,90017,90027,101355).
• Diabetes. Low dietary magnesium may increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, but evidence on the use of supplements for treating type 2 diabetes is conflicting. Details: Higher dietary magnesium intake is associated with lower fasting insulin concentrations and a reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes in adults and obese children (13369,15548,96473,97486,98294,103736,105918,106920). In people with existing type 2 diabetes, hypomagnesemia is found in 25% to 38% of patients, especially in those with poorly controlled diabetes (1172). Population research in adults with type 2 diabetes also shows that a dietary magnesium intake of less than 250 mg daily is associated with a 56% higher risk of mortality. Preliminary subgroup analyses suggest that the risk of mortality is higher in those with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels above 7% (110051). A meta-analysis of small, heterogeneous clinical studies in adults with type 2 diabetes suggests that magnesium may modestly reduce HbA1C in patients with hypomagnesemia, but not in patients with normal magnesium levels, when compared with control (105075). Individual clinical studies using magnesium supplements in patients with type 2 diabetes or insulin resistance have shown mixed results. Some research suggests magnesium supplements can decrease fasting blood glucose and improve insulin sensitivity, as well as reduce the risk of developing diabetes in high-risk patients (10664,12582,13376,60854,99313,106920), but other research shows no effect (1171,1172,13379,13380). Discrepancies in these findings might reflect differences in magnesium salts and doses used, or differences in baseline magnesium status in study subjects.
• Hypercholesterolemia. Magnesium may help improve lipid levels by a small amount in people with this condition. Details: There is some evidence that taking magnesium oxide 1 gram orally daily for 6 weeks can produce small decreases in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol levels, and small increases in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. However, magnesium does not seem to improve lipoprotein (a) levels (1193). Magnesium may also lower triglycerides in people with hypertriglyceridemia (97494).
• Metabolic syndrome. Low dietary and serum levels of magnesium seem to be associated with the development of metabolic syndrome. Details: Higher magnesium intake from diet and supplements is associated with a 27% lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome in healthy females (13371) and a 31% lower risk in healthy young adults (14304). Additional epidemiological research suggests that people with low serum magnesium levels are 6-7 times more likely to have metabolic syndrome than people with normal magnesium levels (13372). In a population analysis of over 6000 individuals without metabolic syndrome at baseline, the risk of developing this condition over a 6-year follow-up period was reduced by 16% in the highest quintile of dietary magnesium intake (median intake 371 mg daily) when compared with the lowest quintile (median intake 203 mg daily). Some, but not all, research suggests that the hazard ratio for metabolic syndrome in relation to magnesium intake may be U-shaped, with higher risk at intakes below about 150 mg daily and above 600 mg daily (108963).
• Osteoporosis. Increased dietary and supplemental magnesium intake seems to increase bone mineral density and decrease bone loss in postmenopausal patients. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking magnesium hydroxide orally, 300-1800 mg daily for 6 months, then 600 mg daily for 18 months, or magnesium citrate orally 1830 mg daily for 30 days, might reduce bone loss and bone turnover in postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis (9104,60928). Some epidemiological research also suggests that magnesium intake is related to increased bone mineral density (12501,12502,12503,12504,90014), although not all studies have found an association (12505,98286).
• Postoperative pain. Injectable magnesium has been used with promising results for reducing pain postoperatively. Details: Intravenous magnesium sulfate, 5-50 mg/kg bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 6 mg/kg or 500 mg hourly during surgery, seems to reduce the 24-hour postoperative use of intravenous morphine by 24% when compared with placebo (19968). Adding intravenous magnesium sulfate 3.7-5.5 grams to patient-controlled analgesia for 24 hours after surgery has also been used (19968). Meta-analyses also support that adjunctive intravenous and intrathecal administration of magnesium improves pain relief and sensory nerve block, and decreases the need for other analgesics, when compared with control (89390,90012,90015,98287,103728); however, it appears to be less effective than dexmedetomidine (105082). A moderate-sized clinical study in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in China shows that adding magnesium sulfate 2.5 mg/mL to the periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) cocktail reduces pain scores, limits the use of postoperative morphine, prolongs analgesia, and reduces markers of inflammation when compared with the usual PIA cocktail (111181). Administering magnesium intravenously also seems to be helpful for pain control after hysterectomy. A 3-gram IV bolus of magnesium sulfate followed by an infusion of 0.5 grams per hour for 20 hours has been used. Lower doses were not effective (6848). However, intravenous magnesium might not alleviate postoperative pain in children. Two small clinical studies show that administering a magnesium intravenous infusion does not reduce pain when compared with saline in children after tonsillectomy or after elective strabismus surgery (98282,105077).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Taking magnesium orally seems to relieve symptoms of PMS. Details: There is some evidence that magnesium supplementation can improve symptoms, including mood changes and fluid retention, in some patients with PMS (1187,1188,6847). Doses used include magnesium oxide 333 mg daily for 2 menstrual cycles, or magnesium pyrrolidone carboxylic acid equivalent to 360 mg elemental magnesium three times daily, from the 15th day of the menstrual cycle until onset of menstrual flow (1187,1188). Taking magnesium orally in a dose of 360 mg (elemental magnesium) three times daily for 2 months seems to prevent premenstrual migraine (1186,6847). A combination of magnesium 200 mg daily plus vitamin B6 50 mg daily seems to reduce anxiety-related premenstrual symptoms, including nervous tension, mood swings, irritability, and anxiety, when compared with placebo (8555).
• Vasospastic angina. Intravenous magnesium seems to prevent coronary spasm in patients with this condition. Details: Clinical research shows that administration of intravenous magnesium sulfate 65 mg/kg infused over 20 minutes dilates coronary arteries and suppresses acetylcholine-induced coronary spasms when compared with infusion of a dextrose solution in patients with vasospastic angina (8091).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Altitude sickness. Taking magnesium citrate orally does not seem to reduce acute altitude sickness risk. Details: Clinical research shows that taking magnesium citrate 1200 mg daily orally in three divided doses, beginning 3 days prior to mountain ascent and continuing until mountain descent, does not reduce the risk of acute altitude sickness when compared with placebo (60801).
• Athletic performance. Taking magnesium orally does not seem to improve energy or endurance during athletic activity. Details: Most evidence suggests that taking magnesium orally doesn't increase energy and endurance during athletic activity. Magnesium oxide, aspartate, and orotate salts don't seem to improve exercise performance when used alone or in combination with potassium (2825,2826,2828,2829,2830,60751).
• Bronchiolitis. Intravenous or nebulized magnesium is not beneficial in infants with this condition. Details: Clinical research shows that administering a single IV dose of magnesium sulfate 100 mg/kg to infants with acute bronchiolitis does not improve, and may actually worsen, symptoms when compared with placebo (97482). A clinical study in infants with moderate to severe bronchiolitis shows that adding nebulized magnesium sulfate 40 mg/kg to nebulized epinephrine does not reduce hospital stay or the need for ventilator or oxygen support when compared with epinephrine alone (99317). Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for this use.
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Research on the effects of intravenous infusions of magnesium and calcium for preventing oxaliplatin neurotoxicity are inconsistent, but higher quality studies seem to show no benefit. Details: Pooled analyses of cohort studies and clinical trials show that calcium and magnesium infusions can decrease the incidence of severe oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). However, when only clinical trials are considered, the infusions do not appear to be helpful (90005,90029,90031,96474,96479).
• Complex regional pain syndrome. Intravenous magnesium is not beneficial in complex regional pain syndrome type 1. Details: Clinical research shows that receiving magnesium sulfate 70 mg/kg intravenously at the rate of 25 mL/hour for 4 hours each day for 5 days does not improve pain or level of impairment when compared with placebo in patients with chronic complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (89395).
• Emergence delirium. Small clinical studies in adults and children undergoing various surgeries suggest that intravenous (IV) magnesium doesn't reduce the risk of emergence delirium. Details: A small clinical study in adults undergoing surgery for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair shows that administering IV magnesium 30 mg/kg as a loading dose, followed by a 10 mg/kg/hour infusion for the duration of surgery, does not improve agitation or delirium scores when compared with administering saline (111182). Similarly, a small clinical study in children ages 2-5 years undergoing elective strabismus surgery shows that administering IV magnesium during anesthesia does not seem to prevent the occurrence of emergence delirium when compared with administering saline (105077). In a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials in children aged 2-16 years undergoing general anesthesia for oral or ophthalmic surgery, giving IV magnesium as a 30 mg/kg loading dose followed by a 10 mg/kg/hour infusion, or as a single dose of 15-30 mg/kg, does not reduce emergence delirium scores, and may actually prolong emergence times (108729).
• Menopausal symptoms. Oral magnesium oxide does not seem to be beneficial for menopausal hot flashes. Details: A small, low quality study in postmenopausal patients with a history of breast cancer shows that taking magnesium oxide 400-800 mg orally daily reduces hot flashes when compared with baseline (102454). However, a larger, higher quality clinical study using magnesium oxide 800-1200 mg daily did not show any benefit when compared with placebo (98290).
• Muscle cramps. Oral magnesium does not seem to improve muscle cramp frequency or intensity. Details: Meta-analyses of small clinical trials show that magnesium supplementation for 3-6 weeks does not decrease the frequency or intensity of skeletal muscle cramps, whether the cramps are idiopathic or due to liver cirrhosis or pregnancy, when compared with placebo (90022,104395).
• Sickle cell disease. Intravenous magnesium does not add any benefit to standard therapy for sickle cell disease in children. Details: Clinical research shows that giving magnesium sulfate 40-100 mg/kg (maximum of 2 grams per dose) intravenously every hour for 6-8 doses as an adjunct to standard therapy does not decrease hospital stay, pain, or opioid use, or improve quality of life, when compared with standard therapy and placebo in children with sickle cell disease (89399,98283,101356). Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for this purpose.
• Stillbirth. Magnesium administered during pregnancy does not reduce stillbirth risk. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that magnesium supplementation does not significantly decrease the risk of stillbirths when administered during pregnancy (60925,60978).
• Tetanus. Intravenous magnesium sulfate does not seem to improve outcomes in patients with this condition. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous magnesium sulfate does not reduce mortality when compared with placebo or diazepam in patients with tetanus (61020). While some research shows that magnesium reduces the duration of hospitalization and the need for ventilation when compared with diazepam (61170), magnesium does not seem to improve these outcomes when compared with placebo (60860).
• Traumatic brain injury (TBI). Magnesium does not improve clinical outcomes in patients with moderate to severe TBI. Its effect in patients with concussions is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of four clinical trials shows that treatment with magnesium does not significantly improve neurological outcomes or reduce the risk of mortality when compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe TBI (60905). A small observational cohort study in adolescents with concussions has found that adding oral magnesium 400 mg twice daily for 5 days to standard treatment with acetaminophen and ondansetron is associated with a trend toward reduced symptom severity when compared with standard treatment alone (104401). The validity of this study is limited by its observational nature and small cohort size.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. Intravenous magnesium does not seem to help reduce symptoms of alcohol withdrawal but may reduce the duration of alcoholic delirium. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that administration of four intramuscular injections of magnesium sulfate 2 grams at 6-hour intervals does not reduce symptoms of alcohol withdrawal when compared with saline (61063). A small observational study in patients with alcoholic delirium has found that administering magnesium sulfate IV 50 mg/kg every 8 hours, in addition to usual sedation, is associated with a reduction of delirium by approximately 2 days, or 4 days when given every 12 hours in addition to dexmedetomidine, when compared with usual sedation alone (111180). However, half of patients had hypomagnesemia at baseline; it is unclear if effects would be similar for patients with normal magnesium levels. Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for this purpose.
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there has been interest in using oral magnesium for allergic rhinitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of magnesium for this purpose.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial in children with ADHD. Details: Children with ADHD seem to have lower magnesium levels in their blood and hair (9969,100262,100263). A small clinical study in children aged 7-12 years with ADHD and magnesium deficiency shows that taking magnesium aspartate and lactate 6 mg/kg daily for 6 months might improve hyperactivity and magnesium levels when compared with control (1189). Another small clinical study in children with ADHD but without magnesium deficiency shows that taking magnesium 6 mg/kg daily along with vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks may modestly improve emotional problems, but not inattention or hyperactivity, as measured on the strength and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ), when compared with placebo (105914).
• Back pain. It is unclear if oral or intravenous magnesium is beneficial for acute or chronic back pain in adults. Details: One open-label clinical study in adults with acute low-back pain shows that taking magnesium 365 mg once daily in addition to taking etodolac 400 mg twice daily for 10 days does not further reduce pain when compared with taking etodolac alone (105913). Magnesium has also been tried for chronic back pain. A small clinical study in patients with chronic low-back pain shows that receiving magnesium sulfate 1 gram in 250 mL normal saline intravenously every 4 hours for 2 weeks, followed by magnesium gluconate 100 mg and magnesium oxide 400 mg by mouth daily for 4 weeks, reduces pain severity when compared with placebo (90035). It is unclear if oral magnesium used alone is beneficial.
• Bariatric surgery complications. It is unclear if oral magnesium supplementation improves metabolic parameters after bariatric surgery. Details: A retrospective study of over 3000 post-bariatric surgery patients suggests that those who take oral magnesium supplements providing 100-450 mg elemental magnesium daily may have improved metabolic parameters over 4 years of follow-up. When patients taking magnesium supplements were compared with those not taking supplements, 11% and 18% had type 2 diabetes, respectively, 30% and 42% had hypertension, respectively, and 16% and 23% had elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, respectively. For patients with hypomagnesemia at baseline, supplementation seemed to result in greater benefits (108968).
• Bipolar disorder. Taking magnesium orally might improve manic symptoms in some people with bipolar disorder; however, it is unclear how it compares to current standard of care. Details: One preliminary clinical study shows that magnesium 40 mEq daily (Magnesiocard) for 32 weeks has similar effects to lithium in up to 50% of patients treated for rapid cycling bipolar affective disorder (61022). Another preliminary clinical study shows that magnesium oxide 375 mg orally daily plus verapamil 80 mg taken four times daily reduces manic symptoms more effectively than verapamil alone in patients with mania (60742).
• Cancer-related neuropathic pain. It is unclear if intravenous magnesium is beneficial for this condition. Details: Single 500 mg to 1 gram doses of magnesium sulfate seem to relieve neuropathic pain for up to four hours when compared to baseline (6846). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Chemotherapy-induced leukopenia. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial in pediatric patients at risk for cisplatin-induced febrile neutropenia. Details: A small clinical study in children with solid tumors aged 9 years and older shows that taking magnesium 250 mg daily while receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy reduces febrile neutropenia by 47% and septic shock by 57% when compared with not receiving magnesium. Results from this study suggest that four pediatric patients need to take oral magnesium to avoid one case of febrile neutropenia (104394).
• Cardiac arrest. Intravenous magnesium does not seem to be helpful in cardiac arrest; however, the risk of sudden cardiac death seems to be inversely correlated to higher plasma magnesium levels or dietary intake. It is unclear if magnesium supplementation is associated with similar risk reduction. Details: Administering magnesium intravenously doesn't seem to improve successful resuscitation in people with cardiac arrest (1190). However, higher plasma magnesium levels and higher dietary magnesium intake might reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death, possibly by protecting against fatal ventricular arrhythmias. In the Nurses' Health Study, the risk of sudden cardiac death was 77% lower in females with the highest quartile of plasma magnesium levels when compared with the lowest quartile. Also, the risk was 37% lower in females with the highest quartile of dietary magnesium intake when compared with the lowest quartile (17132).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Evidence regarding the effect of dietary magnesium on CVD risk is conflicting. Details: Epidemiological research in some populations shows that increased dietary magnesium intake is associated with decreased mortality due to strokes, coronary heart disease, ischemic heart disease, and heart failure, but other epidemiological research does not show any effect on these risks (89391,90003,90009,90030,90036,103735). Reasons for the discrepancies may be related to serum levels of magnesium at baseline, risk of cardiovascular disease at baseline, use of concomitant medications such as diuretics, or the presence of concomitant conditions such as kidney dysfunction. A population analysis conducted in Denmark has found that magnesium intake from drinking water may be associated with cardiovascular mortality. The overall risk of cardiovascular death and death due to stroke was reduced by 4% in the lowest 3 quintiles of intake when compared with the highest quintile. However, the risk of death due to acute myocardial infarction was increased by 22% in the lowest quintile when compared with the highest (108726). The relevance of these results is unclear, given that the main dietary source of magnesium is food rather than drinking water.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Limited evidence suggests that magnesium may help improve CFS symptoms, but this is controversial. Details: In people with low red blood cell magnesium, there is some evidence that intramuscular injections of 1 gram magnesium sulfate given once weekly for 6 weeks might improve CFS symptoms (7556). However, there is additional evidence that most patients with CFS have normal magnesium stores, and measurement of red cell magnesium is a poor indicator of total magnesium stores (7557,8084,8085,8086,8087).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Intravenous, but not nebulized, magnesium may be helpful in acute exacerbations of COPD. Details: Administering magnesium sulfate intravenously, 1.2-2.5 grams over 20 minutes, might be helpful for treating acute exacerbations of COPD (1208,6844,103733). Also, giving magnesium sulfate 2 grams intravenously seems to improve exercise capacity when compared with placebo (89384). A meta-analysis of studies using intravenous magnesium sulfate for COPD exacerbations shows that it reduces hospital admission and mean length of stay and improves dyspnea scores when compared with placebo. Based on the relative risk identified in the included studies, seven patients would need to receive intravenous magnesium to prevent one hospitalization. However, intravenous magnesium sulfate does not change the need for non-invasive ventilation and the available research did not evaluate intensive care unit (ICU) admission (108967). Nebulized magnesium has also been evaluated. In patients experiencing a COPD exacerbation, clinical research shows that administering nebulized magnesium sulfate with albuterol three times at 30-minute intervals does not improve pulmonary function as measured by the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) when compared with placebo (89393). Also, a meta-analysis of a small number of low-quality studies shows that nebulized magnesium does not reduce hospital admission or the need for ventilatory support, although it might modestly improve dyspnea scores and reduce ICU admissions, when compared with placebo (108967).
• Cluster headache. It is unclear if a single intravenous dose of magnesium sulfate is beneficial for cluster headaches. Details: Administering magnesium sulfate intravenously, 1 gram over 5 minutes, seems to improve cluster headaches when compared with baseline(1184). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). It is unclear if magnesium supplementation is beneficial for CHD. Details: Clinical research shows that magnesium oxide 800-1200 mg daily for 3 months reduces platelet-dependent thrombosis by 35% when compared with placebo in patients with CHD (60759). It is unclear if this effect improves clinical outcomes. The effect of magnesium supplementation on coronary artery calcium has also been studied. A meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies in 196 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) shows that taking magnesium or increasing the concentration of magnesium in dialysate does not improve coronary artery calcification (CAC) scores when compared with standard therapy. However, magnesium reduced carotid intima-media thickness (111179). Similarly, a large clinical study in patients with CKD shows that taking slow-release magnesium hydroxide (Mablet, Denmark) 360 mg twice daily for 12 months does not slow the progression of CAC scores when compared with placebo (111178). This study may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Depression. It is unclear if magnesium is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of depression in adults. Details: Some population research shows that dietary intake of elemental magnesium between 76-360 mg daily is associated with a reduced risk of depression, but there was no association with greater amounts of magnesium, and other population research shows no association at any intake level (96480,98289). For treatment of mild to moderate depression, one preliminary clinical study shows that taking magnesium chloride 2 grams orally daily for 6 weeks reduces depression scores by 56% and anxiety scores by about 52% when compared to baseline (96477). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group. However, a small clinical study in adults with recurrent depression shows that taking magnesium aspartate 120 mg daily for 8 weeks, along with fluoxetine, does not improve depression scores when compared with patients taking fluoxetine and placebo (111185). Similarly, a very small crossover clinical study in adults with mild or moderate treatment-resistant depression shows that administering a single dose of IV magnesium sulfate 4 grams does not improve depression scores when compared with an infusion of 5% dextrose (96481). However, scores were evaluated 24 hours post-infusion which may be too soon to detect improvement. Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that elemental magnesium in doses of 100-400 mg is not recommended for adjunctive or monotherapy use in patients with depression (110318).
• Diabetic foot ulcers. Oral magnesium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with grade 3 diabetic foot ulcers shows that taking magnesium oxide 250 mg plus vitamin E 400 IU daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces ulcer size when compared with placebo (101436). It is unclear if this effect is due to magnesium, vitamin E, or the combination.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral magnesium reduces muscle soreness in adults after resistance training. Details: A very small study in healthy adults, ages 19-23, shows that taking magnesium glycinate 350 mg daily for 10 days seems to reduce muscle soreness after bench press exercise when compared with placebo (104399).
• Fibromyalgia. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for this condition. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking magnesium chloride orally 100 mg once daily for one month reduces mild to moderate, but not severe, stress associated with fibromyalgia when compared with placebo. It also reduces pain levels, but not to a clinically significant extent, and it does not affect sleep, fatigue, or quality of life (108964). Another small clinical study shows that taking magnesium citrate 300 mg daily for 8 weeks improves some symptoms of fibromyalgia, such as number of tender points and depression, when compared to baseline (89385). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. A small clinical study shows that taking a combination of magnesium hydroxide and malic acid (Super Malic tablets) orally decreases fibromyalgia-related pain and tenderness in some patients when compared with placebo (3262). It is unclear if this effect is due to magnesium, malic acid, or the combination.
• Fractures. Population research suggests that higher intakes of magnesium may reduce fracture risk. Details: Observational research has found that higher dietary and supplemental magnesium intake is associated with a 34% lower odds of fracture when compared with lower magnesium intake (101395).
• Gastric cancer. Population research suggests that higher intakes of magnesium may reduce gastric cancer risk. Details: Observational research has found that higher dietary and supplemental magnesium intake is not associated with a reduced risk for gastric cancer when compared with lower intake (103730).
• Hearing loss. Oral magnesium may prevent and improve hearing loss due to environmental factors or loud noises. Details: Clinical research in healthy military recruits shows that taking magnesium aspartate 167 mg daily for 2 months prevents hearing loss from exposure to loud noises during basic military training when compared with placebo (1205). Also, in patients with acute-onset hearing loss that was not caused by environmental factors, taking magnesium aspartate 167 mg daily for 8 weeks seems to improve hearing loss when compared with placebo (60813).
• Hypertension. Oral magnesium supplementation may modestly reduce blood pressure, although these changes are not likely to be considered clinically significant. Details: Most research shows that taking oral magnesium supplements in daily doses that are at least as high as the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for adults and up to 1000 mg daily can lower diastolic blood pressure by about 2 mmHg in adults with or without hypertension (1192,1199,9465,15165,18111,96482). Significantly lower doses do not seem to have this effect (1180,1195,1197,8098). The effect of magnesium on systolic blood pressure is conflicting. One meta-analysis shows that taking magnesium 240-970 mg daily does not lower systolic blood pressure (15165). However, more recent meta-analyses show that taking magnesium 120-970 mg daily can lower systolic blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner by about 2-4 mmHg in patients with or without hypertension (18111,96482). In 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that inconsistent and inconclusive evidence suggests that diets with adequate magnesium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure. Products bearing this claim must provide at least 84 mg of magnesium daily, but no more than 350 mg daily (107451).
• Hypokalemia. It is unclear if intravenous or oral magnesium is beneficial for hypokalemia in patients with normal magnesium levels. Details: A preliminary retrospective observational study in patients with hypokalemia and unknown serum magnesium levels has found that administering oral or intravenous magnesium is not associated with improved time to normalization of serum potassium levels when compared with no magnesium treatment (110049). However, hypokalemia with concurrent hypomagnesemia can impede potassium repletion and exacerbate hypokalemia-induced rhythm disturbances. Standard of care in patients with hypokalemia and known hypomagnesemia includes prompt treatment with magnesium (110063).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for prediabetes. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with prediabetes shows that taking magnesium oxide 250 mg orally daily for 12 weeks does not improve fasting blood glucose levels, insulin resistance, or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels when compared with placebo. Taking magnesium also did not affect blood pressure, body weight, triglyceride levels, or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels; however, it did modestly improve high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (110053).
• Insomnia. Oral magnesium may modestly improve sleep complaints in adults, but evidence is conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of two small clinical studies in healthy older adults with or without insomnia suggests that taking magnesium reduces the time to fall asleep by an average of 17 minutes when compared with placebo (105917). However, it does not increase the time spent asleep. Also, these findings are limited by imprecision and a high risk of bias. Studies included in the analysis used elemental magnesium 500-729 mg daily (as magnesium oxide) for up to 8 weeks (102458,105917). Another small clinical study in patients with poor sleep quality and low magnesium status shows that taking elemental magnesium 320 mg (as magnesium citrate) in divided doses daily for 7 weeks does not improve sleep quality, as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), when compared with a sodium citrate placebo (102456). A very small crossover clinical study in patients aged 18-40 years without a sleep disorder shows that taking a combination of magnesium 300 mg, L-tryptophan 1000 mg, glycine 3000 mg, tart cherry 220 mg, and theanine 200 mg for 3 days reduces the time to fall asleep by about 24 minutes, increases total time asleep by about 22 minutes, and improves sleep efficiency, but does not improve the total time in bed or wakefulness after falling asleep when compared with cellulose placebo (111184). It is unclear if these effects are due to magnesium, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Intraventricular hemorrhage. It is unclear if antenatal intravenous magnesium sulfate can reduce the risk for intraventricular hemorrhage in neonates. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in premature infants shows that if the mother received antenatal intravenous magnesium sulfate, the infant had a non-significant trend toward a reduced risk of intraventricular hemorrhage when compared with infants whose mothers received placebo (103727). This analysis may have been insufficiently powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Taking magnesium orally may prevent the recurrence of kidney stones, although evidence is conflicting. Details: Prophylactic treatment with magnesium hydroxide, 200 mg twice daily for one year, followed by 500 mg daily for another year, might decrease the recurrence rate of calcium stone formation (2007). However, magnesium oxide does not seem to benefit patients considered to be recurrent calcium stone formers when compared with placebo, no treatment, or chlorthalidone (8097,38501,61199). Magnesium oxide 300 mg in combination with vitamin B6 10 mg daily seems to decrease urinary oxalate levels in people with hyperoxaluria who have previously had kidney stones (1201), but it is unclear if this effect translates into a reduced incidence of kidney stones.
• Liver cancer. Increased dietary magnesium intake is linked with a lower risk of liver cancer. Details: Observational research in retired older Americans has found that higher dietary magnesium intake is associated with a 35% lower risk of liver cancer when compared with lower intake. This association was especially strong in persons who were moderate or heavy alcohol users (105080).
• Migraine headache. Oral magnesium may help prevent migraine in some adults and children. Also, intravenous magnesium may help treat migraine in adults, but evidence is conflicting. Details: Small clinical studies in adults with migraine suggest that taking oral high-dose magnesium citrate 600-1830 mg daily in divided doses for up to 3 months seems to modestly reduce the frequency and severity of headaches when compared with baseline or placebo (4891,9498,60902). Limited evidence suggests that adding oral magnesium to conventional treatment may also be beneficial. A clinical study in adults with migraine living in Iran shows that taking magnesium oxide 250 mg twice daily in addition to sodium valproate 200 mg twice daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces severity and duration of migraine, but not migraine frequency, when compared with taking sodium valproate alone (105915). It is unclear if these improvements would be considered clinically significant. In contrast, one small clinical study shows that taking magnesium does not reduce migraine frequency and severity by at least 50% in adults when compared with placebo (10661). For treatment of migraine, some adults with normal magnesium levels respond to intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate 1 gram over 5 minutes, but most patients who benefit have low magnesium levels at baseline (1185,6844). Effects of IV magnesium in patients with unknown magnesium levels are conflicting. Some preliminary clinical research shows that magnesium 1-2 grams IV alleviates acute migraine for up to 2 hours, but other research has found no benefit (89388,97493,98285). In children, treatment with magnesium oxide orally 15 mg/kg daily in 3 divided doses for up to 16 weeks reduces the frequency and severity of migraine headaches when compared with placebo (10663). However, adding magnesium sulfate 400 mg orally daily to ibuprofen or acetaminophen does not further reduce migraine severity in children (89396).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Research on the effects of intravenous or oral magnesium after myocardial infarction are conflicting. Details: Administering magnesium intravenously doesn't seem to reduce mortality after an acute MI (8999,13357,13358,13359,13360,19990,60872,61082), although there is some conflicting evidence from a meta-analysis of clinical research that shows that intravenous magnesium sulfate may reduce short-term mortality by 55% when compared with placebo (60795,60895). Clinical research with oral magnesium supplementation has found no benefit (1198,6844).
• Neonatal encephalopathy. Intravenous magnesium may improve short-term outcomes in neonates with encephalopathy. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous magnesium may improve short term outcomes of neonatal encephalopathy (hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, HIE). However, long term outcomes are not affected (90025).
• Nocturnal leg cramps. It is unclear if oral magnesium is helpful for nocturnal leg cramps. Details: Some clinical research in adults with nocturnal leg cramps shows that taking magnesium oxide 865 mg daily at bedtime for 4 weeks does not reduce the frequency of leg cramping episodes when compared with placebo (96478). However, four weeks may be too short a time to see a benefit. In other clinical research, taking oral magnesium oxide monohydrate 226mg daily at bedtime for 60 days reduces the frequency of leg cramps when compared with placebo. This reduction was not seen after 30 days. Magnesium also reduced cramp duration and improved sleep quality, but did not affect pain scores, at 60 days when compared with placebo (106919).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Oral magnesium hydroxide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults with NAFLD shows that taking magnesium hydroxide 150 mg and L-carnitine 2000 mg daily for 16 weeks does not improve liver stiffness scores when compared with baseline or controls who took placebo for 8 weeks followed by this magnesium and L- carnitine combination for 8 weeks. Taking magnesium and L-carnitine also did not improve levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) when compared to baseline (111177).
• Obesity. Evidence on the use of magnesium for weight loss in obese patients is conflicting; any benefit is likely small at best. Details: A meta-analysis of 7 clinical studies in obese patients shows that taking magnesium reduces body mass index (BMI) by 0.3 when compared with control (103723). Another meta-analysis of 7 studies in obese patients shows that while magnesium supplementation does not reduce weight, it reduces waist circumference by 2 cm when compared with placebo (103729). Interestingly, subgroup analyses did not find that the dose of magnesium or baseline magnesium levels impacted effectiveness. One subgroup analysis found that magnesium supplementation lasting 12 weeks or less seemed to be more beneficial for obesity than supplementation lasting longer than 12 weeks (103723).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if oral or IV magnesium reduces the risk of overall mortality. Details: A meta-analysis of heterogeneous observational studies has found that increased dietary magnesium intake, but not supplemental magnesium intake, is associated with a modestly reduced risk of overall mortality (105073). A meta-analysis of 3 small, low-quality clinical studies in ICU patients shows that administering IV magnesium 24-30 mmol or as a target-directed dose for 3 days reduces overall mortality when compared with patients who did not receive magnesium (111290). However, some studies included patients with hypomagnesemia; it is unclear if effects would be similar for patients with normal levels of magnesium.
• Osteoarthritis. Population research has not found a link between magnesium intake and osteoarthritis risk. Details: Observational research has found that dietary and supplemental magnesium intake is not associated with the risk of developing osteoarthritis (101395).
• Pain (acute). It is unclear if intravenous magnesium is helpful for acute pain associated with kidney dysfunction. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with renal colic shows that intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate, 50 mg/kg infused over 20 minutes, is as effective as IV morphine sulfate 0.1 mg/kg for controlling acute renal pain at 20 minutes after the dose (107367).
• Pain (chronic). Population research suggests that higher intakes of magnesium may modestly reduce the risk for chronic pain. Details: A cross-sectional observational study has found that increased magnesium intake is associated with a 7% to 8% reduced risk for chronic pain. The association was found to be stronger in females than in males (103732).
• Perioperative anxiety. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for perioperative anxiety. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing open heart surgery shows that taking magnesium oxide 250 mg orally twice daily during hospitalization moderately improves anxiety and depression scores when compared with no magnesium therapy. Magnesium therapy was held for the 2 days immediately following surgery (110054).
• Physical performance. Oral magnesium may modestly improve physical performance in otherwise healthy, elderly females. Details: Clinical research in otherwise healthy elderly females shows that taking a magnesium oxide supplement (Easymag, Sanofi-Aventis) 900 mg daily for 12 weeks modestly improves walking speed and chair stand speed in elderly females when compared with no treatment (90026).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for improving metabolic indices in patients with PCOS. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with PCOS show that taking magnesium oxide orally, 250 mg daily for 8 weeks, does not affect insulin resistance, beta-cell function, lipid levels, or insulin sensitivity when compared with placebo (103725,105887). Other clinical research in patients with PCOS shows that taking magnesium oxide orally, 250 mg daily for 10 weeks, improves subjective measures of quality of life, fatigue, and emotional functioning, but not objective measures such as alopecia, abnormal uterine bleeding, or acne, when compared with placebo (108965). A clinical study using a combination of magnesium 250 mg with vitamin E 400 mg daily for 12 weeks shows a modest reduction in insulin resistance, insulin levels, and triglyceride levels, but not other lipid levels, when compared with placebo (100264). It is unclear if these beneficial effects are due to magnesium, vitamin E, or the combination.
• Postoperative sleep disturbance. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for postoperative sleep disturbances. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing open heart surgery shows that taking magnesium oxide 250 mg orally twice daily during hospitalization moderately improves sleep scores when compared with no magnesium therapy. Magnesium therapy was held for the 2 days immediately following surgery (110054).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral magnesium reduces leg cramps during pregnancy; evidence is conflicting. Details: One small clinical study in patients with pregnancy-related leg cramps shows that taking magnesium bisglycinate chelate 300 mg daily for 4 weeks reduces the frequency and intensity of leg cramps when compared with placebo (99318). A smaller clinical study in this population shows that taking a specific mixture of magnesium lactate and citrate (Nycoplus Magnesium) providing elemental magnesium 120 mg in the morning and 240 mg in the evening for 3 weeks reduces the frequency of cramps when compared with placebo (1194). However, not all research agrees. One small clinical study using this same supplement and dose for 2 weeks found no benefit when compared with placebo (17463). It is possible that a 2-week duration of treatment is too short to be beneficial. Finally, a meta-analysis of these studies and one other more recent clinical study shows that taking magnesium does not reduce the frequency or improve the resolution of pregnancy-related leg cramps when compared with placebo (105916). This analysis may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference between treatment groups.
• Preterm labor. The use of magnesium sulfate to inhibit uterine contractions in preterm labor (tocolysis) is controversial. However, its use for the purpose of fetal neuroprotection for up to 48 hours is supported by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Details: Magnesium is given intravenously during preterm labor in an effort to improve fetal neurological outcomes. The typical dosage of magnesium sulfate is 4 grams infused IV over 10-30 minutes, followed by a maintenance infusion of 1-4 grams/hour for 48 hours or until birth. Use beyond 5-7 days has been associated with hypocalcemia and bone abnormalities in the fetus (15,12590,12594). Some meta-analyses of clinical research suggest that magnesium sulfate is more effective at delaying delivery by 48 hours when compared with oxytocin receptor blockers, nitrates, beta-mimetics, and/or placebo (20263,61021). Administration of magnesium during preterm labor has been shown to reduce the risk of cerebral palsy and motor dysfunction in the infant (60882,60915,60927,60931,61001,97485,103734,103754).
• Pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE). It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for PXE. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with PXE shows that taking magnesium oxide 800 mg (500 mg of elemental magnesium) twice daily for one year tends to reduce calcification of elastic skin fibers when compared with placebo, but the effect is not statistically significant (101393). This study was limited by small size and insufficient power to detect smaller effects.
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for RLS. Details: Some observational research has found that hypomagnesemia is associated with RLS; however, not all research agrees (8096,9472). Preliminary clinical research in adults with RLS who are beginning treatment with pramipexole shows that also taking magnesium oxide 250 mg orally daily for 2 months moderately improves RLS scores and sleep quality scores when compared with pramipexole and placebo (110052). Other low-quality clinical research in adults with RLS or periodic limb movement during sleep shows that taking magnesium 12.4 mmol orally in the evening for 4-6 weeks decreases movement and increases sleep when compared with baseline (9466). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Sarcopenia. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of sarcopenia. Details: Population research in older adults has found that lower dietary intake of magnesium is associated with sarcopenia. However, the effect of magnesium supplementation on sarcopenia prevention or treatment has not been evaluated (110055).
• Stroke. Increased dietary magnesium may decrease stroke risk, and using a magnesium-containing salt substitute may improve neurological performance post-stroke. However, intravenous magnesium has not demonstrated benefit. Details: Most population research has found that increased dietary intake of magnesium is associated with decreased stroke risk and decreased mortality from stroke (9001,9002,90013,90030,90036,92107,103736). In patients who have had a stroke, a preliminary clinical study shows that using a salt substitute providing the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) of magnesium and potassium for 6 months improves neurological performance when compared with using regular salt (97491). However, intravenous (IV) magnesium does not seem to be beneficial in patients who have had a stroke. Large prospective clinical trials show that IV magnesium given within 12 hours of acute stroke does not reduce mortality or disability in most patients when compared with placebo. However, one subgroup analysis suggested that IV magnesium might benefit patients with lacunar (non-cortical) stroke (13361,90021). IV magnesium also doesn't seem to reduce cardiovascular complications after acute stroke. A secondary analysis of a clinical trial in patients after ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke shows that giving IV magnesium does not reduce serious cardiac adverse events when compared with placebo (104393). Another secondary analysis of this trial shows that giving IV magnesium prior to arrival at the hospital and within 2 hours of a hemorrhagic stroke does not reduce hematoma volume on hospital arrival, hematoma expansion during hospital admission, or functional outcomes at 3 months (108733).
• Subarachnoid hemorrhage. Intravenous magnesium sulfate may reduce the risk of adverse outcomes in people with subarachnoid hemorrhage, but evidence is conflicting. Details: There is mixed evidence regarding the effect of magnesium sulfate in managing aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. One meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous magnesium sulfate 64-144 mmol/day for 10-18 days reduces the risk of poor outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, including death, vegetative state, or dependency, by 46% when compared with control (60932). Also, meta-analyses of clinical research show that intravenous magnesium reduces the risk of delayed cerebral ischemia by 27% when compared with placebo (60944,89398). However, these results were not confirmed in other meta-analyses (60973,90034).
• Urinary incontinence. Although there has been interest in using oral magnesium for urinary incontinence, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of magnesium for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate magnesium for these uses.

(Read more about MAGNESIUM)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Dry mouth. Most clinical research shows that topical malic acid, used as either a mouth spray or a lozenge for up to 2 weeks, improves symptoms in patients with dry mouth from various causes. Details: A meta-analysis of five small clinical studies in patients with dry mouth from various causes shows that using a mouth spray containing malic acid 1%, with or without xylitol and fluoride, up to 8 times daily for 2 weeks improves dry mouth symptoms and increases salivary flow when compared with placebo or xylitol and fluoride alone (107916). Dry mouth in the evaluated patients was associated with antihypertensive therapy (92211), antidepressant therapy (92213), aging (95565), graft-versus-host disease (101174), and Sjogren syndrome (104778). Malic acid-containing products evaluated for dry mouth include Xeros Dentaid spray (92211,92213,95565), Xeros Dentaid tablets (104778), and SalivAktive (101174). Additionally, a small clinical study in patients with dry mouth due to type 2 diabetes shows that using malic acid 1% mouth spray on-demand for 2 weeks modestly increases salivary flow and improves patient-reported xerostomia scores at the 2-week follow-up, but not at the 1-month follow up, when compared with placebo (111743). Despite most studies showing consistent and positive results, one small clinical study in patients with idiopathic or drug-induced dry mouth failed to show significant improvement with Xeros Dentaid spray when compared with placebo. However, the malic acid spray performed similarly to betaine-based mouthwash and the study was likely underpowered to detect differences between groups (107917).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Topical malic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: An open-label, non-randomized clinical study in patients with mild-to-moderate acne shows that applying a specific cream (Hyseac AHA cream, Uriage) containing malic acid and arginine glycolate twice daily for 60 days, alone or in combination with prescribed pharmacological treatment, improves acne severity in about 64% of patients when compared to baseline. Pharmacological treatment consisted primarily of antibiotics, but also included retinoids and benzyl peroxide (92207). These findings are limited by the lack of a comparator group. Also, it is unclear if these findings are due to malic acid, arginine glycolate, or the combination.
• Actinic keratoses. Although there has been interest in using topical malic acid for actinic keratoses, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of malic acid for this purpose.
• Fatigue. Although there has been interest in using oral malic acid for fatigue, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of malic acid for this purpose.
• Fibromyalgia. Oral malic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with fibromyalgia shows that taking a specific product (Super Malic) containing malic acid 1200 mg and magnesium hydroxide 300 mg twice daily for 6 months reduces pain and tenderness when compared to baseline. However, taking malic acid 600 mg with magnesium hydroxide 150 mg twice daily for 1 month does not reduce pain and tenderness when compared with placebo (3262). The validity of the findings in the follow-on, open-label, 6-month phase of the study is limited by a lack of blinding and placebo control. Also, it is unclear if these findings are due to malic acid, magnesium, or the combination.
• Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Oral malic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with GERD shows that using a specific lozenge containing malic acid 25.58 mg, xylitol 422 mg, and fluoride 0.58 mg (Xeros Dentaid tablets, Dentaid) three times daily in combination with omeprazole 40 mg daily for 6 months may improve saliva buffering capacity and some symptoms of GERD when compared with omeprazole alone (104757). It is unclear if these findings are due to malic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Psoriasis. Although there has been interest in using topical malic acid for psoriasis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of malic acid for this purpose.
• Warts. Although there has been interest in using topical malic acid for warts, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of malic acid for this purpose.
• Wrinkled skin. Although there has been interest in using topical malic acid for wrinkled skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of malic acid for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate malic acid for these uses.

(Read more about MALIC ACID)

EFFECTIVE

• Manganese deficiency. Oral and intravenous manganese can prevent and treat manganese deficiency. Details: Taking manganese orally or intravenously is effective for preventing or treating manganese deficiency (15). However, the incidence of manganese deficiency is not well documented. Long-term home parenteral nutrition should provide no more than 55 mcg daily of manganese for adults or 1 mcg/kg daily (up to 50 mcg) of manganese for children unless clinically indicated (96416,99302). A clinical trial in children aged 8-14 months who are manganese deficient shows that taking manganese in addition to other vitamins and minerals in a 30 mL beverage six days per week for up to 14 months promotes growth when compared with placebo (19348).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if intranasal manganese is beneficial in patients with allergic rhinitis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chronic allergic rhinitis shows that using an isotonic seawater nasal spray enriched with manganese (Sterimar Mn, Laboratori Baldacci) four puffs daily for 5 months, in addition to standard treatment with oral antihistamines, nasal corticosteroids, and nasal decongestants, reduces the number of acute exacerbations by about three when compared with the standard treatment alone (99416). However, the effect of the manganese in this product is unclear since nasal lavage with a plain saline nasal spray also helps in allergic rhinitis.
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Intravenous manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients being treated for exacerbation of COPD shows that intravenous supplementation with manganese 0.4 mg, selenium 100 mcg, and zinc 2 mg daily may shorten the number of days spent on mechanical ventilation when compared with placebo (61432). It is unclear if these findings are due to manganese, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Obesity. Oral manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in overweight adults shows that taking a specific combination product (7-Keto Naturalean, Enzymatic Therapy, Inc.) containing manganese 500 mcg, 7-oxo-DHEA 100 mg, L-tyrosine 100 mg, asparagus root extract 100 mg, choline bitartrate 50 mg, inositol 50 mg, copper gluconate 500 mcg, and potassium iodide 100 mcg daily for 8 weeks reduces body weight by around 1.5 kg and body mass index (BMI) by around 0.7 kg/m² when compared with placebo (61581).
• Osteoarthritis. Oral manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Small clinical studies in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and lower back show that taking a specific combination product (Cosamin DS, Nutramax Laboratories) containing manganese ascorbate 228-304 mg (about 31-41 mg of elemental manganese), glucosamine hydrochloride 1500-2000 mg, and chondroitin sulfate 1200-1600 mg daily for 4 months improves pain and ability to do activities of daily living when compared with baseline or placebo (4237,7169). The amount of manganese in the Cosamin DS formulation used in this study is considerably higher than the 1 mg of elemental manganese per 1500 mg of glucosamine hydrochloride in the current formulation. Since numerous studies show glucosamine with chondroitin without manganese might be effective for osteoarthritis, it is not possible to draw conclusions about the effects of manganese alone.
• Osteoporosis. Oral manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in postmenopausal patients shows that taking manganese 5 mg in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg, zinc 15 mg, and copper 2.5 mg daily for 2 years reduces spinal bone loss when compared with placebo (1994). Another small clinical study in females with osteopenia shows that taking a specific combination product (Vitrum Osteomag, Unipharm Inc.) containing manganese 1.8 mg, calcium 600 mg, vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 200 IU, magnesium 40 mg, zinc 7.5 mg, copper 1 mg, and boron 250 mcg twice daily for one year improves bone mineral density when compared with no treatment (36840). However, since numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of calcium plus vitamin D for osteoporosis, it is not possible to draw conclusions about the effects of manganese alone.
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Oral manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with PMS shows that taking manganese 1.0 mg or 5.6 mg in combination with calcium 587 mg or 1336 mg daily for about 24 weeks improves symptoms of PMS including pain, crying, loneliness, anxiety, restlessness, irritability, mood swings, depression, and tension (2004).
• Wound healing. Topical manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Observational research has found that applying an alginate dressing containing manganese, calcium, and zinc to chronic wounds for 12 weeks is associated with improved wound healing when compared with previous treatments (61327). It is unclear if these findings are due to manganese, other ingredients, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate manganese for these uses.

(Read more about MANGANESE)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Molybdenum deficiency. Taking or consuming molybdenum can treat or prevent molybdenum deficiency (7135,16478). However, molybdenum deficiency is very rare.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Esophageal cancer. Population research suggests that low intake of molybdenum might be associated with an increased risk of esophageal cancer (16478,17205). However, it is not known if molybdenum supplements reduce the risk of developing esophageal cancer. More information is needed to rate molybdenum for this use.

(Read more about MOLYBDENUM)

EFFECTIVE

• Bowel preparation. Oral sodium phosphate is effective for cleansing the colon in preparation for colonoscopy; however, it is unclear whether sodium phosphate is as effective as polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution. Some products are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this use. However, due to the potential for kidney damage, sodium phosphate is not recommended as first-line therapy. Details: Sodium phosphate tablets (OsmoPrep, Salix Pharmaceuticals; Visicol, Salix Pharmaceuticals) are FDA-approved for cleansing the colon in preparation for colonoscopy. Clinical research shows that using the OsmoPrep formulation can achieve an "excellent" or "good" response rate, which is defined as having 90% of the mucosa visible with only some or little suctioning needed, in 94% to 97% of patients (88133). Similarly, using the specific product Visicol has been shown to achieve an excellent or good response rate in 82% to 86% of patients (94674). Non-FDA-approved sodium phosphate products have also been investigated. One such product (Fleet Phospho-soda, C. B. Fleet Co.) has been shown to achieve adequate bowel cleansing in 23% to 89% of patients (93846,94673). Another sodium phosphate tablet preparation (Clicolon tablets, Korea Pharma Co.) has been shown to achieve adequate bowel cleansing in 63% to 93% of patients (93848,93850,93853). Excellent or good bowel cleansing was found in 98.6% of patients using a 32-tablet regimen of other sodium phosphate tablets (Quiklean, Universal Integrated Corporation) (107008). Reasons for the differences in the percentage of patients who achieve adequate bowel cleansing with the same sodium phosphate product may relate to the method used to analyze bowel cleansing, differences in diet followed during bowel cleansing, and demographic factors (93846,93848,93850,93853). Various preparations (OsmoPrep, Salix Pharmaceuticals; Visicol, Salix Pharmaceuticals; Clicolon tablets, Korea Pharma Co.; Quiklean, Universal Integrated Corporation) have been used which contain 1.102 grams of sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate and 0.398 grams of sodium phosphate dibasic anhydrous. These products have been taken as 3-4 tablets with 8 ounces of water every 15 minutes for a total of 20 tablets the evening before colonoscopy, and 3-4 tablets with 8 ounces of water every 15 minutes for a total of 12-20 tablets the morning of a colonoscopy (88133,93848,93850,94674,107008). Also, sodium phosphate solution (Fleet Phospho-soda, C. B. Fleet Co.) containing sodium hydrogen phosphate 24.4 grams and disodium phosphate dodecahydrate 10.8 grams has also been used the morning and evening before the procedure (93846). Numerous publications have compared the bowel cleansing activity of sodium phosphate with PEG solution. When given as a split-overnight dosage, sodium phosphate is about as effective as PEG solutions in achieving adequate bowel cleansing. However, when day-before dosage is used, PEG is more effective for bowel cleansing than sodium phosphate (93861,93862,107008). Sodium phosphate and PEG may have different effectiveness depending on the colonic site assessed. When only trials assessing descending colon cleansing are considered, sodium phosphate is found to work similarly to PEG solutions. When only studies assessing ascending colon cleansing are considered, PEG is more effective for bowel cleansing than sodium phosphate (93861). Also, a large clinical trial in outpatients scheduled for non-sedated colonoscopy shows that receiving PEG resulted in an easier insertion and a less painful colonoscopy when compared with receiving sodium phosphate (104473). However, in patients with chronic constipation, sodium phosphate seems to be preferable. A meta-analysis of three small clinical studies in adults with chronic constipation shows that using sodium phosphate has an 87% greater chance of a successful bowel preparation when compared with using PEG (104472). Sodium phosphate is not recommended as first-line therapy for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy due to the potential for kidney damage (93863,94672). In fact, one sodium phosphate preparation (Fleet Phospho-soda, C. B. Fleet Co.) that was previously approved as an over-the-counter supplement for bowel preparation in the US was withdrawn from the market for this indication in December 2008 due to concerns for phosphate-induced kidney disease (94672). Of the sodium phosphate products that are still approved by the FDA, current guidelines recommend that these products not be used for bowel cleansing in patients with kidney disease, pre-existing electrolyte disturbances, congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, ascites, or inflammatory bowel disease. Guidelines also recommend that caution should be used if these products are prescribed for patients who are elderly, hypertensive, or taking certain classes of drugs (94672). For small bowel preparation for endoscopy, a meta-analysis suggests that sodium phosphate is no more effective than fasting alone (93860).
• Hypophosphatemia. Oral or intravenous phosphate salts are effective for the prevention or treatment of hypophosphatemia. Some products are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this use. Details: Taking sodium or potassium phosphate orally is effective for preventing and treating hypophosphatemia (15). Treating hypophosphatemia with oral phosphates requires monitoring of serum electrolyte levels to determine appropriate dosing (15). The FDA-approved intravenous (IV) product is also used for the correction of hypophosphatemia (8302,8303,88135). FDA-approved intravenous (IV) sodium phosphate or potassium phosphate 15-30 mmol is typically given over 2-12 hours. Higher doses have been used if needed to increase efficacy (8302,8303,88135).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Constipation. Oral or rectal sodium phosphate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an ingredient in over-the-counter (OTC) products to treat constipation. Details: Sodium phosphate is an FDA-permitted ingredient of oral and rectal OTC products intended for the treatment of constipation (88107).
• Dyspepsia. Oral aluminum phosphate and calcium phosphate are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as ingredients in over-the-counter (OTC) antacids. Details: Aluminum phosphate and calcium phosphate are FDA-permitted ingredients of oral OTC products intended for use as antacids (88107).
• Hypercalcemia. Although other treatments are preferred, oral non-calcium phosphate salts are beneficial for treatment of mild to moderate hypercalcemia. Details: Taking phosphate salts (except calcium phosphate) orally is effective for treating mild to moderate hypercalcemia (88144,88145). Treating hypercalcemia with oral phosphates requires monitoring of serum electrolyte levels to determine appropriate dosing (15); other agents are now preferred (6479). Intravenous phosphates should be avoided due to the risk of calcium precipitation in vital organs (metastatic calcification) (15,88144,88145).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Oral potassium phosphate seems to be beneficial for prevention of kidney stones in individuals with hypercalciuria. Details: Taking potassium phosphate orally may help prevent calcium oxalate kidney stones in patients with hypercalciuria (6470). Clinical research in adults with absorptive hypercalciuria and at high risk for stone formation shows that taking a specific slow-release potassium phosphate product (Uro-Phos-K, Mission Pharmacal), providing phosphate 620 mg orally twice daily for 4 days, reduces urinary calcium excretion by 35% to 40% (2208,2209). Potassium and sodium phosphate salts providing 1200-1500 mg of elemental phosphate daily have been used (2209,6470).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Athletic performance. The evidence is mixed as to whether oral sodium phosphate improves cycling or running performance. Most research suggests that oral calcium phosphate and potassium phosphate are not beneficial. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium phosphate or potassium phosphate orally does not improve running or cycling performance (2499,9300,8301). Evidence for the use of sodium phosphate to improve cycling performance is mixed. One very small clinical study shows that taking sodium phosphate as tribasic sodium phosphate dodecahydrate for 6 days before a 10-mile cycling trial increases mean power output by about 10% and decreases the time needed to complete the trial by 3% in trained male cyclists (88150). Other small clinical trials in trained cyclists show that taking the same form of sodium phosphate as 50 mg/kg of fat-free mass in four divided doses daily for 6 days modestly improves work, power output, and peak oxygen uptake and reduces heart rate during high-intensity cycling exercise when compared to baseline (93857,93858,93859,107007). However, conflicting research shows that taking a similar dosage of this form of sodium phosphate does not improve time trial performance, work accomplished relative to energy expenditure, power output, or oxygen uptake in trained cyclists (93855,93856,107007). Sodium phosphate has also been evaluated for improving running performance, with mixed findings. Two small clinical trials in female athletes show that tribasic sodium phosphate dodecahydrate 50 mg/kg of fat-free mass taken in four divided doses daily for 6 days moderately improves repeated sprint times when compared with placebo (93843,93844). However, taking the same dosage does not significantly improve sprint times in male athletes (93849). Also, sodium phosphate does not seem to improve endurance or aerobic capacity in treadmill tests (8301,93854). Reasons for the discrepancies regarding the effects of sodium phosphate on athletic performance are not entirely clear, but likely relate to the very small number of participants in the included trials.
• Diabetic ketoacidosis. Potassium phosphate infusion is not recommended as first-line therapy for adults with diabetic ketoacidosis. Details: Clinical research shows that intravenous infusion of potassium phosphate 8.5 mmol/hour (approximately 6 grams of phosphate over 24 hours) along with potassium chloride 12.5 mEq/hour provides no benefit over potassium chloride alone in adults with diabetic ketoacidosis (88149). Guidelines for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis in the both the US and UK do not recommend phosphate replacement for most patients. However, it may be considered in specific cases, such as cardiac dysfunction, anemia, respiratory depression, and serum phosphate concentrations below 1 mg/dL (107349,107350A).
• Osteoporosis. Calcium phosphate seems to be beneficial for bone density improvement; however, it does not seem to be more beneficial than calcium carbonate. Details: In postmenopausal adults with osteoporosis and low phosphate intakes, taking calcium 1800 mg daily as tricalcium phosphate for 12 months improves lumbar spine and hip densities. However, it is no more effective than taking the same amount of calcium as calcium carbonate (93847). The calcium products were used in combination subcutaneous teriparatide and oral vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 1000 IU daily.
• Refeeding syndrome. It is unclear if intravenous potassium phosphate or sodium phosphate is beneficial for prevention of refeeding syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that giving intravenous sodium and potassium phosphates, 50 mmol (1.56 grams) phosphate over 24 hours, prevents the refeeding syndrome seen when restarting adequate nutrition after severe malnutrition or starvation when compared with historical controls (88148). More evidence is needed to rate phosphate salts for these uses.

(Read more about PHOSPHATE SALTS)

EFFECTIVE

• Hypokalemia. Oral or intravenous potassium can treat and prevent hypokalemia. Details: Administering potassium orally or intravenously is effective for treating and preventing hypokalemia (15,107970). Oral potassium 20 mEq (780 mg of elemental potassium) is typically taken once daily to prevent hypokalemia (15,95010). Oral potassium 40-100 mEq (1560-3900 mg of elemental potassium) is typically taken in 2-5 divided doses daily to treat hypokalemia (95010). Doses should be limited to 40 mEq (1560 mg of elemental potassium), and the total dose should not exceed 200 mEq (7800 mg of elemental potassium) in 24 hours (95010). Potassium supplementation and route of administration should be individualized based on serum potassium level and patient status (15,107970).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Hypertension. Oral potassium, via dietary intake or supplementation, reduces blood pressure. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary potassium consumption is associated with a lower risk of developing hypertension (1310,8817,69512). Additionally, most clinical research shows that potassium, taken orally as part of the diet or as a supplement, reduces systolic blood pressure by about 3-9.5 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by about 2-6.4 mmHg in patients with or without hypertension (3385,92104,92106,95624,107974). In most of these studies, daily intake of potassium typically ranged from about 1500-7800 mg, with the most common intake being about 2340-2540 mg daily (92104,95624). However, some research shows that taking potassium does not lower systolic or diastolic blood pressure (69541,69550,107966). Differences in the patient populations, potassium intake, and salt intake could have contributed to the conflicting results. Potassium seems to be more effective for people with hypertension, low potassium levels, high daily sodium intake, and for Black adults (3384,3385,3386,92104,92106). Some research also shows that the greatest blood pressure-lowering effects of potassium occur at doses of about 3900-7800 mg daily (95624). A meta-analysis of clinical trials using a novel computational technique to assess both potassium intake and excretion suggests that the optimal blood pressure reduction occurs when taking about 1500 mg supplemental potassium daily or an overall intake of 4500-6500 mg potassium daily (105448). This analysis is limited by the heterogeneity and short duration of the included trials. There is also interest in utilizing low-sodium, high-potassium food substitutes to treat hypertension. Research shows that using salt substitutes containing 25% to 30% potassium chloride reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 3-4.6 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, when compared with regular table salt (107971,107976). In 2017, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) published guidelines recommending that patients with hypertension consume 3500-5000 mg of potassium daily (95680). This intake of potassium is expected to lower systolic blood pressure by about 4-5 mmHg in patients with hypertension and by about 2 mmHg in normotensive patients (3385). Although potassium supplements and dietary potassium both seem to be beneficial, the guidelines recommend getting potassium from dietary sources, since potassium-rich diets are usually heart-healthy (95680). Additionally, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Oral prescription potassium citrate reduces the risk of kidney stone recurrence. It is unclear if non-prescription potassium citrate would be beneficial. Details: The American Urological Association (AUA) recommends potassium citrate therapy for patients with recurrent calcium stones and low urinary citrate, those with recurrent calcium or calcium oxalate stones without current metabolic abnormalities, and those with uric acid or cystine stones. The citrate component reduces urine calcium excretion and increases urine citrate and urine pH, which in turn alleviates crystal growth, formation, and aggregation. Sodium citrate may also be used to prevent stone recurrence; however, due to sodium's propensity to increase urine calcium excretion, potassium citrate remains the preferred salt formulation (107972). It is important to note that potassium citrate supplements are not equivalent to prescription potassium citrate products. Dose and duration of treatment is determined by a healthcare professional and individualized based on a patient's urinary citrate levels (107975,107989). Serum potassium levels should be monitored prior to starting potassium citrate, within 2 weeks of treatment initiation, and every 12 months (107975).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Eating foods high in potassium and low in sodium might reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. It is unclear if taking potassium supplements has the same benefit. Details: Large population studies in adults without prior CVD have found that higher dietary potassium intake is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events (109395,109399). One study found that daily potassium intake of about 3300 mg is associated with a 13% reduction in CVD risk when compared with intake of about 1920 mg (109399). The other study found that each additional 1000 mg of daily urinary potassium excretion, which is a marker of dietary intake, is associated with an 18% reduction in CVD risk (109395). Another observational study in over 15,000 adults with history of stroke or hypertension shows that replacing regular table salt with a substitute product containing 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride for an average of 5 years decreases the rate of stroke, major cardiovascular events, or death (107976). High quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this association. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).
• Stroke. Eating foods high in potassium and low in sodium might reduce the risk of stroke. It is unclear if taking potassium supplements has the same benefit. Details: Higher dietary intake of potassium seems to be associated with a lower risk of stroke. Population research has found that increasing dietary potassium intake by 1-1.5 grams daily is associated with up to a 20% reduced risk of stroke (92105,92107). Some population research has found that higher supplemental intake of potassium is associated with a 29% reduced risk of ischemic stroke. However, supplemental potassium intake is not found to be associated with a lower risk of hemorrhagic or total stroke (92107). An observational study in over 15,000 adults with history of stroke or hypertension shows that replacing regular table salt with a substitute product containing 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride for an average of 5 years decreases the rate of stroke, major cardiovascular events, or death (107976). High quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this association. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Dental hypersensitivity. It is unclear if topical potassium improves dental hypersensitivity. Details: One meta-analysis of clinical research shows that using a dentifrice containing 5% potassium nitrite reduces dentin sensitivity when compared with a dentifrice that does not contain potassium nitrite (69549). Other clinical research published in a systematic review shows that potassium-containing toothpastes might reduce dentin sensitivity more than controls that do not contain potassium. However, these toothpastes might be less effective than other active toothpastes, such as those containing sodium monofluorophosphate, and the effect may result from a placebo effect, since the mechanism of action of potassium is unclear (69456).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if increasing dietary potassium reduces the risk of diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of 7 large population studies has found that consuming dietary potassium 3300-3500 mg daily is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of diabetes when compared with consumption below 1000 mg daily. Results were similar when studies that measured potassium intake with a dietary questionnaire were analyzed separately from those that measured intake based on urinary potassium excretion (110776). However, the validity of this finding is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies. Furthermore, despite use of data from various databases, most studies included in the analysis were conducted by the same author.
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral potassium improves glycemic control in prediabetes. Details: A small clinical study in Black patients with prediabetes shows that taking extended-release potassium (Klor-Con M10, Cardinal Health) 40 mEq daily as potassium chloride for 3 months does not improve glucose tolerance when compared with placebo. Although fasting glucose levels were slightly reduced in the potassium group when compared with placebo, both groups experienced a worsening of glucose intolerance, with no change in insulin levels or glycated hemoglobin (98533).
• Osteoporosis. Although there is interest in using oral potassium for osteoporosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of potassium for this condition.
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral potassium improves physical performance in older adults. Details: Observational research in older adults has found that decreased dietary potassium intake and increased dietary sodium intake over 5 years is associated with worsened physical performance (105450).
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral potassium is beneficial in patients with SLE. Details: Observational research in patients with SLE has found that increased dietary potassium intake is not associated with improvements in disease activity scores or markers of cardiovascular disease, including lipid levels and blood pressure, when compared with low dietary potassium intake. However, higher potassium intake does seem to reduce the odds of having elevated levels of C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation, in these patients (109397). More evidence is needed to rate potassium for these uses.

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Selenium deficiency. Oral selenium is effective for the treatment and prevention of selenium deficiency. Details: Selenium supplementation is effective for reversing symptoms of selenium deficiency, as well as for preventing the development of selenium deficiency (4844,90357).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Autoimmune thyroiditis. Oral selenium seems to improve autoimmune thyroiditis in adults but not in children. Details: Clinical research in adults with thyroiditis shows that taking selenium up to 200 mcg daily in combination with levothyroxine reduces thyroid peroxidase antibodies by about 6% to 30% more than placebo after 3-12 months of treatment (9797,17510,17511,17512,17513,17515,17516,97943,104424). Selenium also seems to improve measures of quality of life such as feelings of well-being and mood (17515). Doses under 200 mcg daily might not be as effective (17512); selenomethionine might be more effective than sodium selenite (97943). Some research shows that selenium might be more effective in patients with more severe disease activity and less effective in patients with only moderate disease activity (9797,17513,17515). Also, selenium might not reduce thyroid autoantibodies in patients newly diagnosed with thyroiditis not receiving concurrent levothyroxine (97943). There is no reliable evidence about the effect of selenium on thyroid function or thyroid morphology. Despite positive findings in adults, clinical research in children suggests that taking selenium 50-200 mcg daily for 3-12 months does not significantly improve thyroid peroxidase antibodies, thyroglobulin antibody, or thyroid echogenicity (17514,90362).
• Kashin-Beck disease. Selenium seems to help prevent Kashin-Beck disease, but does not improve symptoms in patients with existing disease. Details: A meta-analysis of prospective studies conducted in China shows that adding salt enriched with selenium to the diet of healthy children for up to 4 years reduces the odds of developing Kashin-Beck disease by 84% when compared with the use of iodine salt. Additionally, in children with Kashin-Beck disease, adding salt enriched with selenium to the diet might help heal metaphyseal lesions (97945). However, selenium does not seem to improve symptoms in those with existing disease. A clinical trial in children with Kashin-Beck disease shows that selenium supplementation does not improve joint pain or mobility when compared with placebo (55941).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral selenium might reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia in pregnant patients. Details: A meta-analysis of three low-quality clinical trials in pregnant patients shows that taking selenium 60-100 mcg daily for up to 6 months reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia by 72% when compared with placebo. Additionally, a meta-analysis of population research has found that the risk of pre-eclampsia is higher in pregnant patients with low selenium levels. Selenium levels were about 6.5 mcg/L lower in those who developed pre-eclampsia compared with those who did not (97946).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Asthma. Oral selenium does not seem to improve asthma symptoms. Details: Epidemiological research has found that plasma selenium concentration is not associated with asthma (74422). Also, clinical research in patients with asthma shows that taking selenium 100 mcg daily for 14-24 weeks does not improve symptoms, lung function, use of rescue inhalers, or quality of life when compared with placebo (74490,74387).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Oral selenium-enriched yeast does not seem to improve eczema symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients with eczema shows that taking selenium-enriched yeast 600 mcg daily for 12 weeks, either alone or in combination with vitamin E 600 IU daily, does not improve symptom severity when compared with placebo (74456).
• Bladder cancer. Despite promising initial research, oral selenium does not seem to prevent bladder cancer development or recurrence. Details: In 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding selenium and bladder cancer risk based on two small studies. However, the FDA determined that it is highly uncertain that selenium supplements reduce the risk of bladder cancer (102373). Since that time, the available research has not confirmed an association between selenium and bladder cancer risk. Epidemiological research has found that selenium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of bladder cancer (97085). Furthermore, a clinical study shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily with or without vitamin E 400 IU daily for about 7 years does not prevent bladder cancer in older men (90352). Selenium also does not seem to prevent bladder cancer recurrence. A clinical study shows that taking selenium yeast 200 mcg daily for 3 years does not prevent the recurrence of bladder cancer when compared with placebo in patients that had undergone a transurethral resection for non-invasive bladder cancer (97087).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Most research shows that oral selenium does not reduce the risk of CVD. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical trials in patients with and without risk factors for CVD show that taking selenium alone or with other supplements for up to 8 years does not reduce the risk of CVD mortality or fatal and non-fatal CVD events (90360,97078). When reported, patients in these studies all had adequate plasma selenium levels at baseline (90360).
• Colorectal cancer. Oral selenium does not seem to prevent cancer of the colon and rectum. Details: Epidemiological research has found no association between serum concentrations of selenium and the risk of developing colorectal cancer (74321,97085). Also, meta-analyses of clinical research, as well as individual clinical trials, show that taking selenium 100-200 mcg daily, alone or in combination with other vitamins and minerals, does not reduce the risk of colorectal cancer when compared with control (16707,34676,90361,97092).
• Diabetes. Increased intake of selenium, either in the diet or as a supplement, is associated with an increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes. It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial in patients with type 2 diabetes. Details: Observational research has found that high serum selenium levels, high dietary selenium intake, and selenium supplementation are each linked to an increased risk of developing diabetes (97091,99661). Consuming more than the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) of selenium daily is associated with an increased risk of developing diabetes when compared with consuming less than the RDA (99661). However, the effect of short-term selenium supplementation in patients with diabetes is unclear. Three small clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes and various other conditions, such as cardiovascular disease or kidney failure, show that taking selenium (Nature Made) 200 mcg daily for 8-24 weeks does not improve fasting blood glucose. However, taking selenium seems to reduce insulin resistance and improve insulin sensitivity and levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol when compared with placebo (97084,97086,109092). These three studies were included in a meta-analysis of 10 small, mostly moderate-quality clinical studies. This analysis shows that taking selenium 100-200 mcg daily for 4 to 24 weeks improves markers of insulin resistance and reduces serum insulin levels but does not lower fasting blood glucose when compared with placebo. Selenium supplementation did not reduce total or LDL cholesterol or triglycerides but may improve HDL cholesterol (110593). However, the validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies, which enrolled patients with diabetes, gestational diabetes, cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or obesity. Additionally, all studies were conducted in Iran; it is unclear if these findings are generalizable to populations in other geographic locations.
• Dyslipidemia. Most research shows that oral selenium supplementation does not improve cholesterol levels. Details: A meta-analysis of 11 clinical studies in adults with dyslipidemia shows that taking selenium 50-300 mcg daily for 8-24 weeks does not increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels or decrease total or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels when compared with placebo. Taking selenium might modestly improve triglyceride levels, but this improvement is unlikely to be considered clinically significant (99662). Another meta-analysis of 21 mostly small, low-quality clinical studies, some of which were included in the prior meta-analysis, shows that taking various forms of selenium may modestly decrease total cholesterol levels, but does not improve triglycerides, LDL, or HDL cholesterol when compared with placebo (110595). However, the validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies, which assessed various selenium dosing regimens and enrolled healthy patients or those with various cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular conditions.
• Low birth weight. Oral or intravenous selenium supplementation does not improve outcomes in low birth weight infants. Details: Low selenium levels have been documented in low birth weight infants. However, selenium supplementation, orally or intravenously, does not appear to improve most outcomes in low birth weight infants. Clinical research shows that administering selenium, either as 7-10 mcg/kg daily parenterally or 5 mcg/kg daily orally, does not improve oxygen dependency or reduce the risk of death in low birth weight infants when compared with placebo. However, supplementation decreases the incidence of sepsis by up to 33% (74288,97083).
• Lung cancer. Oral selenium does not reduce lung cancer risk in most patients. Details: A meta-analysis of three large clinical trials of over 20,000 patients, including patients with resected stage I non-small-cell lung cancer, shows that taking selenium 200-400 mcg daily for up to 5 years does not reduce the risk of lung cancer when compared with control (92912,97092). A secondary analysis of one of these studies found that selenium supplementation might reduce lung cancer risk in people with selenium levels below 105 ng/mL (9798). Also, a large study in healthy Chinese patients shows no benefit of using selenium in combination with other nutrients for over 5 years when compared with control (34539).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. Oral selenium does not reduce the risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer and has been linked to increased risk in some patients. Details: Epidemiological research has found that higher selenium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer (97085). Furthermore, clinical research shows that taking selenium orally 200 mcg daily does not reduce the risk of basal cell carcinoma when compared with control (2664,10687). In addition, some evidence shows that daily selenium supplementation might increase the risk of squamous cell carcinoma and total non-melanoma skin cancer (10687).
• Prostate cancer. Oral selenium does not seem to reduce prostate cancer risk. Details: Population studies have found that higher serum or toenail selenium levels are associated with a decreased risk of prostate cancer (8734,8735,8736,92911,10263). However, clinical research does not support this finding. A meta-analysis of 5 large clinical trials of over 20,000 patients shows that selenium 200-400 mcg daily for up to 5 years does not reduce the risk of prostate cancer when compared with control (97092). A 7-14 year follow-up study of one of these trials shows there was still no reduction of prostate cancer risk (17688). Selenium has also shown no benefit when used in combination with other supplements. In a large-scale clinical study (SU.VI.MAX), taking selenium 100 mcg in combination with vitamin C, vitamin E, beta-carotene, and zinc did not reduce prostate cancer risk (14135). In 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding selenium and prostate cancer risk, stating that it is highly unlikely that selenium supplements reduce the risk of prostate cancer (102373).
• Psoriasis. Oral selenium does not seem to reduce psoriasis severity. Details: Clinical research shows that taking selenium-enriched yeast 600 mcg daily for 12 weeks, either alone or in combination with vitamin E 600 IU daily, does not reduce the severity of psoriasis when compared with placebo (74460).
• Sepsis. Intravenous selenium does not appear to improve outcomes in septic adults. Details: Earlier meta-analyses of clinical trials in septic adults showed that parenteral administration of selenium, along with routine nutritional interventions, reduces the risk of mortality by 11% to 27% when compared with placebo (90347,92907,92910). However, a more recent meta-analysis, which includes a large, multi-center study of over 1000 cases, shows that parenteral selenium does not reduce mortality in septic adults at 28, 90, or 180 days when compared with placebo (99658). Enteral selenium with other nutrients has been studied for sepsis in children. Clinical research in children shows that taking enteral selenium 40-400 mcg daily with zinc, glutamine, and IV metoclopramide is no more effective than whey protein for reducing time to first episode of nosocomial infection or sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the selenium combination treatment might reduce the risk for sepsis in immunocompromised pediatric patients (86095).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral selenium reduces the risk of cognitive decline in older adults. Details: A cross-sectional study in elderly Americans has found that lower blood levels of selenium are associated with a greater risk of poor cognitive scores when compared with higher levels (104426).
• Alcohol-related liver disease. Although there is interest in using oral selenium for alcohol-related liver disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of selenium for this condition.
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there is interest in using oral selenium for allergic rhinitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of selenium for this condition.
• Arsenic poisoning. It is unclear if oral selenized yeast is beneficial for patients that were exposed to high levels of arsenic in the environment. Details: A small clinical study in Chinese people environmentally exposed to high concentrations of arsenic shows that taking selenized yeast providing 100-200 mcg of selenium daily for 14 months decreases the concentration of arsenic and symptoms of toxicity when compared with placebo (7831).
• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in men with BPH shows that taking selenium 240 mcg plus silymarin 570 mg daily for 6 months reduces lower urinary tract symptoms when compared with placebo (88155). Another clinical study in men with BPH shows that taking tamsulosin 0.4 mg plus a specific product containing selenium, saw palmetto, and lycopene (Profluss, Ayanda AS) daily for one year improves lower urinary tract symptoms and urodynamic parameters when compared with tamsulosin-alone (90354). It is unclear if these effects are due to selenium, other ingredients, or the combinations.
• Burns. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Small clinical studies in patients with burns on 46% of their body surface suggest that taking a combination of copper 2.5-3.1 mg, selenium 315-380 mcg, and zinc 26.2-31.4 mg daily reduces the incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia, but does not seem to improve wound healing, hospital stay, or mortality, when compared with placebo (6520,74382). Another very small clinical study in burn patients suggests that taking copper 4.5 mg, selenium 190 mcg, and zinc 40 mg daily reduces the duration of hospitalization, but does not have an effect on recovery and wound treatment requirements, when compared with standard dietary doses of these nutrients (74485).
• Cancer. Selenium does not seem to reduce the risk of cancer in most people, but it might be beneficial in those with low selenium levels and in men. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research and several clinical studies show that selenium supplementation does not reduce the incidence of cancer or cancer-related mortality when compared with control (14109,34538,74414,97078,97092). In clinical studies, selenium 100-400 mcg taken daily for 2-7.5 years with or without additional antioxidants did not reduce overall cancer risk (14109,34538,74414). However, most evidence did not assess baseline selenium levels. Other evidence suggests that selenium may have a benefit in men and in people with lower selenium levels. Epidemiological research has found that selenium intake at the recommended daily allowance (RDA) of 55 mcg or higher is associated with decreased cancer incidence and cancer mortality, especially in men (97085,103164). However, this research suggests that cancer risk was also influenced by age, body mass index, and smoking status (103164). Some clinical research also suggests that taking selenium might decrease the risk of cancer, when only men are considered (14109). An older meta-analysis of clinical research suggests that selenium was particularly beneficial in patients with lower baseline levels of selenium and in patients at high risk for cancer (90350). In 2003, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that consumption of selenium may produce anticarcinogenic effects and reduce the risk for certain forms of cancer. However, the FDA has determined that the evidence is limited and inconclusive (102374).
• Cataracts. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: An ancillary clinical study shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily with or without vitamin E 400 IU daily for around 5.6 years does not reduce the risk of age-related cataracts in men when compared with placebo (92902).
• Cervical dysplasia. It is unclear if oral selenized yeast is beneficial for patients with cervical dysplasia of mild severity. Details: A small clinical study in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1) shows that taking yeast containing selenium 200 mcg daily for 6 months resulted in regression of CIN1 in 88% of participants, compared with regression in only 55% of participants taking placebo (97944).
• Chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in cancer patients shows that drinking a beverage containing vitamin C, vitamin E, and selenium does not prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity when compared with a placebo beverage (74340). However, poor compliance to treatment may limit the validity of these findings.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there is interest in using oral selenium for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of selenium for this condition.
• Cirrhosis. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis shows that taking a combination of selenium, vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E, methionine, and coenzyme Q10 for 12 weeks does not improve fatigue or any other disease-related symptoms when compared with placebo (34494).
• Cisplatin-associated ototoxicity. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in cancer patients shows that drinking a beverage containing vitamin C, vitamin E, and selenium does not prevent cisplatin-associated hearing loss when compared with placebo beverage (74340). However, poor compliance to treatment may limit the validity of these findings.
• Colorectal adenoma. It is unclear if oral selenium prevents recurrence of adenomas in the colon and rectum. Details: A large clinical study in patients with a history of colorectal adenomas shows that taking a specific selenium supplement (SelenoExcell High Selenium Yeast, Cypress Systems) 200 mcg daily for about 33 months does not reduce adenoma recurrence when compared with placebo. However, in a sub-group of patients with advanced adenomas at baseline, selenium seems to reduce risk of recurrence by 18% when compared with placebo (97091). Some research also shows that taking selenium in combination with zinc, and vitamins A, C, and E reduces adenoma recurrence when compared with placebo (92903). It is not clear any benefit is due to selenium, other nutrients, or the combination.
• Congestive heart failure (CHF). Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in elderly patients with heart failure living in Sweden shows that taking a specific selenium supplement (SelenoPrecise, Pharma Nord) 200 mcg plus a specific coenzyme Q10 supplement (Bio-Quinon, Pharma Nord) 200 mg daily for about 4 years reduces the risk of cardiovascular mortality by about 55% when compared with placebo (92904). The risk reduction seems to be most pronounced in patients with lower selenium levels (97906). Furthermore, at 10- and 12-year follow-ups, cardiovascular mortality in the treatment group continued to be 49% and 41% lower, respectively, when compared with placebo (96546,97466). It is unclear if the benefit can be attributed to selenium, coenzyme Q10, or the combination.
• Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. It is unclear if oral selenized yeast is beneficial for patients undergoing CABG surgery. Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing CABG surgery shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily as selenium yeast for 4 weeks improves glycemic control, lipid levels, and markers of inflammation when compared with placebo (103163). It is not known whether this influences the outcome or complications of CABG surgery.
• Critical illness (trauma). Evidence on the use of intravenous selenium in critically ill patients is conflicting. Details: The most recent meta-analysis of 24 clinical trials in critically ill patients shows that intravenous selenium does not improve survival over 6 months, shorten hospital stay, or reduce intensive care unit (ICU) stay, infectious complications, development of acute kidney failure, or duration of mechanical ventilation when compared with control. Also, length of ICU stay was increased by about 4.5-fold in patients receiving selenium in doses of more than 1000 mcg daily (109086). These findings are similar to those of a meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials in critically ill patients from 2016 which shows that intravenous selenium given alone or with other nutrients does not improve mortality, duration of hospital stay, or kidney function when compared with control (97090). However, another recent meta-analysis of 19 clinical trials in critically ill patients shows that intravenous selenium reduces total mortality by 14% and shortens hospital stay by about 2 days when compared with control, without affecting ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, or mortality over 28 days (101345). The reasons for these discrepancies are not clear and do not seem to be completely explained by differences in doses or durations of selenium (109086). Some reasons for the discrepancies might include differing analytic methods used in meta-analyses, as well as variations in forms of selenium, concomitant treatments, and specific patient populations. One sub-analysis shows that, when limited to randomized controlled trials examining the effect of selenium supplementation in patients sustaining traumatic injury, the odds of mortality was reduced by about 26% and duration of ICU and hospital stay were modestly reduced. There was no effect on infectious complications (109090).
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral selenium prevents dementia or reduces symptoms. Details: Observational research has found that taking selenium 200 mcg daily for 4 years does not decrease the incidence of dementia in men 60 years or older (93570). However, the follow-up period may not have been long enough to reliably detect the effect of selenium on the development of dementia. Also, the screening method used to detect new cases of dementia may have failed to identify individuals presenting with only the initial symptomatic stages of the disease (93570,93571).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial for the treatment of prevention of depression. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found no difference in serum levels of selenium between patients with or without depression. In addition, serum levels of selenium do not correlate with depression scores (109091). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that selenium supplementation, usually 100-200 mcg daily, modestly reduces symptoms of depression; however, at least one of the three studies included in this meta-analysis investigated the effects of selenium in patients with postpartum depression, specifically (109091). These meta-analyses are limited by the quality of included research and the small number of available studies.
• Diabetic nephropathy. It is unclear if oral selenium alleviates diabetic nephropathy symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients with diabetic nephropathy shows that taking selenium (Nature Made) 200 mcg daily for 12 weeks does not improve kidney markers such as blood urea nitrogen or serum creatinine when compared with placebo (97084).
• Dilated cardiomyopathy. There is limited evidence on the oral use of selenium in patients with Keshan disease and peripartum cardiomyopathy. Details: Observational research in patients with a specific type of dilated cardiomyopathy called Keshan disease and congestive heart failure has found that selenium supplementation is associated with a 61% decreased risk of cardiac death when compared with no supplementation (101346). A small clinical study in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy and selenium deficiency shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily for 3 months does not seem to improve heart failure symptoms or left ventricle systolic function, or prevent death, when compared with no treatment (104420).
• Esophageal cancer. Limited research suggests that oral selenium does not reduce esophageal cancer risk. Details: Low quality clinical research suggests that taking selenium supplements alone or with other vitamins does not decrease the risk of esophageal cancer when compared with control (4679,12185).
• Gastric cancer. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients and in a specific patient population; its effect when used alone and in other populations is unclear. Details: Population research in Chinese patients has found that high levels of selenium are associated with lower risk of gastric cancer and cancer mortality (97948). However, clinical research does not agree. A large clinical study in patients residing in China shows that taking selenium 37.5 mcg in combination with vitamin C 250 mg and vitamin E 100 IU twice daily for about 7.3 years does not reduce the risk of developing gastric cancer or precancerous gastric lesions when compared with placebo. This combination treatment was not associated with reduced gastric cancer incidence or mortality at the 14-year follow-up of this study (14447,51470). Another clinical study in healthy Chinese adults also shows that taking a combination of selenium 50 mcg, vitamin E 30 mg, and beta-carotene 15 mg daily for 5.2 years does not reduce the risk of gastric cancer when compared with control (4679). It is unclear if these findings are generalizable to populations in geographic locations other than China.
• Graves' ophthalmopathy. It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial for Graves' ophthalmopathy. Details: A small clinical trial in adults with Graves' ophthalmopathy shows that taking selenium 100 mcg twice daily for 6 months is modestly beneficial for reducing disease activity, based on signs and symptoms including pain, swelling, and redness, when compared with placebo (109085).
• Hepatitis C. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with hepatitis C shows that taking a combination of selenium 200 mcg, vitamin C 500 mcg, and vitamin E 945 IU daily for 6 months does not have an effect on levels of alanine aminotransferase or viral load when compared with placebo (74377).
• HIV/AIDS. It is unclear if oral selenium improves outcomes in patients with HIV. Details: Clinical trials in HIV-positive men and women, most receiving anti-retroviral therapy (ART), shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily for up to 2 years can reduce HIV-1 viral load, increase CD4 cell counts, and lower the risk of hospitalizations when compared with placebo (15266,74314). However, not all research agrees. Two small clinical trials in HIV-positive patients taking ART shows that taking selenium 100-200 mcg daily for 6-12 months does not reduce the risk for opportunistic infections and does not increase CD4 counts when compared with control (7830,104417). Furthermore, selenium does not seem to benefit patients that are not receiving conventional ART. A large clinical study in HIV-infected pregnant patients in Tanzania with poor access to ART shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily with prenatal vitamins until 6 months after delivery, does not improve progression of HIV nor pregnancy outcomes when compared with no selenium supplementation (74419). Another large clinical study in HIV-infected and ART-naïve patients in Botswana shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily for 24 months does not slow HIV progression when compared with placebo (92905).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral selenium improves blood pressure. Some evidence suggests selenium supplementation may slightly increase systolic blood pressure. Details: A meta-analysis of 5 small clinical studies in adults with various health conditions shows that taking selenium or selenium yeast 100-200 mcg/day for 6-12 weeks may increase systolic blood pressure by about 2 mmHg but does not impact diastolic blood pressure when compared with placebo (110595). However, the validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies, which enrolled patients with preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, obesity, or heart failure. Additionally, all studies were conducted in Iran; it is unclear if these findings are generalizable to populations in other geographic locations.
• Hyperthyroidism. It is unclear if oral selenium alleviates symptoms in patients with Graves' disease. Details: A small clinical study in patients with Graves' hyperthyroidism shows that taking sodium selenite 300 mcg daily in addition to treatment with methimazole for 24 weeks does not affect symptoms or recurrence rates when compared with placebo plus methimazole (97089). Oral selenium has also been studied in combination with other supplements. A small preliminary clinical trial in patients with newly diagnosed Graves' disease and low levels of selenium and vitamin D shows that taking selenium 100 mcg daily for 180 days along with vitamin D as cholecalciferol 7000 IU weekly for 270 days, in addition to methimazole, modestly reduces levels of serum free thyroxine and improves quality of life when compared with methimazole alone. However, taking selenium and vitamin D did not affect levels of free triiodothyronine or positive thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor antibody (109049).
• Hypothyroidism. It is unclear if oral selenium improves thyroid hormone balance in elderly individuals, pregnant patients, or patients with subclinical hypothyroidism. In patients with iodine deficiency, selenium supplementation may be harmful. Details: Low selenium levels or selenium deficiency seems to reduce conversion of thyroxine (T4) to triiodothyronine (T3). However, clinical research in healthy elderly patients is conflicting. Although one study shows that taking selenium 100 mcg daily for 3 months increases conversion of T4 to T3 when compared with placebo (17508), a larger study shows that taking selenium 100-300 mcg daily for 6 months does not impact conversion of T4 to T3 when compared with placebo (17509). Additionally, taking selenium can worsen hypothyroidism in people with iodine deficiency. People who are iodine- and selenium-deficient should not receive selenium supplements without concomitant iodine. In these individuals, selenium increases conversion of T4 to T3, but the thyroid gland lacks iodine to synthesize more T4 (1664,14563,14564,14565,17508). Selenium does not have a significant effect on thyroid function when iodine intake is adequate (1664,4844). In pregnant patients with hypothyroidism, clinical research shows that taking selenium does not reduce complications such as pre-eclampsia or preterm birth. However, selenium might improve postpartum thyroid function and decrease the risk of postpartum thyroiditis (17507). Also, taking selenium 200 mcg daily during pregnancy seems to reduce the risk of developing postpartum thyroid dysfunction and permanent hypothyroidism by 41% and 42%, respectively, when compared with placebo in euthyroid pregnant patients who are positive for thyroid peroxidase antibodies (74391). Selenium supplementation has also been studied for subclinical hypothyroidism. Clinical research in females aged 18 to 50 years with or at risk for subclinical hypothyroidism in Slovakia shows that taking selenium 83 mcg daily and myo-inositol 600 mg daily for 6 months modestly reduces thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroid auto-antibody titers when compared with baseline. Selenium and myo-inositol supplementation also reduced patient-reported hypothyroid symptoms including fatigue, menstrual cycle irregularity, and intolerance to heat or cold (110591). The interpretation of these results is limited by the lack of a control group. In addition, it is unclear if these effects are due to selenium, myo-inositol, or the combination.
• Influenza. Although there is interest in using oral selenium for influenza, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of selenium for this condition.
• Kidney failure. It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial for improving lipid parameters in patients on hemodialysis. Details: Selenium levels may be low in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis, and supplementation might be needed (1805,11053). However, clinical research in patients on hemodialysis shows that taking selenium daily for 3 months does not improve the lipid profile when compared with taking placebo (109095).
• Lichen planus. It is unclear if topical or oral selenium alleviates oral lichen planus symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients with oral lichen planus shows that applying a selenium hydrogel (selenomethionine 14 mcg/gram) twice daily for 6 weeks seems to significantly reduce pain at a 12 week follow-up, but not immediately after use, when compared with applying topical corticosteroids and antifungal agents 2-4 times daily. Taking oral selenium 200 mcg twice daily for 6 weeks seems to be no different than the topical corticosteroids and antifungal treatment at both time points (104422).
• Liver cancer. It is unclear if oral selenium reduces liver cancer risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research in China suggest that taking selenium 200 mcg daily for 2-5 years can reduce the incidence of liver cancer when compared with control (74389). The benefit of selenium on prevention of liver cancer in Western countries is unknown.
• Lymphedema. It is unclear if oral selenium reduces lymphedema complications. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with secondary lymphedema after breast cancer surgery shows that taking a sodium selenite solution 1000 mcg daily for 1 week followed by 300 mcg daily for 2 weeks and then 200 mcg daily for a total of 15 weeks might reduce recurrence of erysipelas, a type of bacterial skin infection, when compared with placebo (15334).
• Male infertility. It is unclear if oral selenium, used alone or in combination with other antioxidants, improves pregnancy or live birth rates for couples with idiopathic male infertility. Details: Meta-analyses of 2-3 clinical trials show that taking selenium, alone or in combination with other antioxidants, for 12-26 weeks modestly improves sperm count and motility when compared with placebo. However, pregnancy rates and live birth rates were only studied in one clinical trial each, with no statistical evidence of benefit (109094). Studies included in the analysis used selenium 26-200 mcg daily for 12-26 weeks, either alone or in combination with vitamin A 1 mg, vitamin C 10 mg, and vitamin E 15 mg; vitamin E 400 IU and folic acid 5 mg; lycopene 6 mg, vitamin E 400 IU, vitamin C 100 mg, zinc 25 mg, folate 0.5 mg, and garlic 1000 mg; or N-acetyl-cysteine 600 mg (74526,74493,102968,109094).
• Mercury toxicity. It is unclear if oral selenium improves clearance of mercury and reduces symptoms of toxicity. Details: A small clinical trial in Chinese adults environmentally exposed to high concentrations of mercury shows that taking selenium-enriched yeast, containing selenium 100 mcg, daily for 3 months increases urinary excretion of mercury when compared with control (90351).
• Muscular dystrophy. There is limited evidence on the oral use of selenium in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Details: Preliminary clinical research suggests that supplementation with sodium selenite 1 mg daily for 6 months does not improve disease activity in patients with muscular dystrophy (74455).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial for weight reduction. Details: A small clinical study in adults with obesity shows that taking selenium 240 mcg daily and following a low-calorie diet for 3 months is no different for weight reduction when compared with following a low-calorie diet alone (104416).
• Oral mucositis. It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial for reducing oral mucositis in patients undergoing radiotherapy. Details: A small clinical study in patients with head and neck cancers shows that taking selenium 200 mcg twice daily for the duration of radiation therapy does not seem to reduce the incidence or severity of oral mucositis when compared with placebo (104421). It is unclear if other doses or routes of administration might be beneficial.
• Osteoarthritis. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with osteoarthritis shows that taking a specific selenium-containing combination supplement (Selenium-ACE) does not improve most clinical symptoms when compared with placebo (74449).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral selenium reduces ovarian cancer risk. Details: Epidemiological research has found that there is no association between dietary selenium intake and the risk of developing ovarian cancer (74342).
• Overall mortality. Although oral selenium does not seem to reduce overall mortality risk in most patients, it might have benefit in patients with low nutrient intake. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that selenium supplementation, alone or in combination with other micronutrients, does not reduce all-cause mortality when compared with placebo (15305,90360,97078). Selenium might also not be beneficial when used in combination with non-nutrient supplements. An additional large clinical study in elderly patients in Sweden shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily plus coenzyme Q10 100 mg twice daily for around 5 years does not reduce the risk of all-cause mortality when compared with placebo. The baseline selenium status of these patients is unclear (92904). Despite these results, some evidence suggests that selenium used with other nutrients might have benefit in patients with low nutrient intake. In a large clinical study, selenium in combination with zinc, vitamin C, vitamin E, and beta-carotene lowered all-cause mortality risk in men, but not women, when compared with control (14109). Researchers speculate that this result occurred because men have a lower intake of dietary antioxidants than women. Another large clinical study in Chinese patients with chronically low nutrient intake shows that taking selenium with beta-carotene and vitamin E decreases stroke mortality, cancer mortality, and total mortality when compared with control (2673).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral selenium reduces pancreatic cancer risk. Details: Some epidemiological research has found that increased selenium intake is associated with a 34% lower risk of pancreatic cancer (97093). However, other observational research has found no association (101342).
• Pancreatitis. Although there is interest in using oral selenium for pancreatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of selenium for this condition.
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial for PCOS. Details: A small clinical study in patients with PCOS shows that taking selenium (Nature Made) 200 mcg daily for 8 weeks results in a significantly higher pregnancy rate of 19%, compared with 3% in those taking placebo. The incidences of alopecia and acne were reduced by 77% and 73%, respectively. There were also modest reductions in hirsutism severity and serum levels of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA); however, there was no effect on other hormone levels (109096). Another small clinical study in patients with PCOS undergoing in vitro fertilization shows that taking selenium yeast 200 mcg daily for 8 weeks improves measures of insulin sensitivity and reduces serum insulin and fasting blood glucose levels when compared with placebo. However, selenium supplementation does not improve the pregnancy rate or lipid parameters (110596). The effect of selenium supplementation on the live birth rate in this population is unclear. Selenium has also been studied in combination with other supplements for patients with PCOS. A small clinical study in adults with PCOS shows that taking selenium 200 mcg daily for 12 weeks, in conjunction with a combination probiotic product, modestly improves subjective scores of depression, anxiety, and stress when compared with placebo. Taking this combination also modestly reduces total testosterone levels and subjective ratings of hirsutism when compared with placebo (99659). It is not clear if these effects are due to selenium, the probiotic, or the combination.
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial for postpartum depression. Details: A meta-analysis of two observational studies has found that a high selenium intake is associated with a modestly reduced risk of postpartum depression. The effect of selenium supplementation on symptoms of postpartum depression is unclear. One moderate-sized clinical trial included in this publication shows that taking selenium reduces symptoms of postpartum depression (109091).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral selenium reduces the development of hypertension during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study in pregnant patients shows that drinking a dietary liquid containing selenium 100 mcg daily for 6-8 weeks seems to decrease the incidence of pregnancy-induced hypertension when compared with placebo (74481).
• Premature rupture of membranes (PROM). It is unclear if oral selenium during pregnancy prevents PROM. Details: One clinical trial shows that taking selenium 100 mcg daily from the first trimester of pregnancy until delivery significantly reduces the incidence of PROM to 13%, compared to 34% with placebo (109097).
• Radiation-induced diarrhea. It is unclear if oral selenium reduces diarrhea in patients receiving radiation therapy for cancer. Details: A small clinical study in patients with cervical or endometrial cancer shows that taking selenium 500 mcg on days of radiation therapy and 300 mcg on days without radiation therapy reduces the incidence of radiation-induced diarrhea to 20.5%, compared to 44.5% in the control group not taking selenium. This benefit appears to be more pronounced in patients receiving a larger (>1302 mL) planning target volume of radiation (90355).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if oral selenium, as selenized yeast, reduces RA symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients with RA suggests that taking selenized yeast, providing selenium 200 mcg, daily for 90 days does not improve objective measures of RA when compared with placebo. However, there might be small improvements in quality of life measures (9763).
• Schizophrenia. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with schizophrenia shows that taking a combination of selenium (Nature Made) 200 mcg and a combination probiotic mixture (LactoCare, Zisttakhmir Company) daily for 12 weeks modestly improves general positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, but not positive or negative scores, when compared with placebo. There were also modest improvements in levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), fasting glucose, insulin resistance, and insulin sensitivity, but not lipid parameters (109087).
• Statin-induced myopathy. Small clinical studies suggest that oral selenium may not improve symptoms of myopathy in patients taking statins. Details: Small clinical studies in patients with statin-induced myopathy suggests that taking selenium (SelenoPrecise, Pharma Nord) 200 mcg daily with or without coenzyme Q10 for 3 months does not improve myopathy symptoms when compared with placebo (92908,92909).
• Stroke. It is unclear if intravenous selenium improves neurological outcomes following a stroke. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with a recent first ischemic stroke shows that intravenous sodium selenite pentahydrate (Selenase, Biosyn, Arzenitmittel GmbH) 2000 mcg after admission and then 1000 mcg daily for 5 days modestly improves some, but not all, measures of neurological deficits when compared with placebo (109088). Another small clinical trial in patients with a recent ischemic stroke shows that the same intervention improves some neurological outcome measures on day 7 or at an earlier discharge, but benefits were not maintained at 3 months (109093). The effects of oral selenium on neurological outcomes following a stroke have not been investigated.
• Succinylcholine-induced myalgia. It is unclear if oral selenium is beneficial for preventing succinylcholine-induced postoperative myalgia. Details: Clinical research in patients receiving succinylcholine for a sinuscopy shows that taking a single dose of selenium 200 mcg 2 hours before anesthesia induction modestly decreases the incidence of postoperative myalgia at 24 hours. In those taking selenium, 95% of patients had no postoperative myalgia, compared with 77.5% of those taking placebo. Postoperative analgesia requirements were also modestly reduced; however, there was no difference in overall pain or the incidence of muscle twitching (109089).
• Thyroid cancer. It is unclear if oral selenium reduces the risk of thyroid cancer in most patients. Details: In 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding selenium and thyroid cancer risk. This qualified health claim was based on one weak and limited study. The FDA has determined that it is highly uncertain that selenium supplements reduce the risk of thyroid cancer (102373). More recent observational research in postmenopausal individuals using data from the Women's Health Initiative has found that selenium intake at or above the recommended daily allowance from dietary sources or supplements is not associated with a decreased risk of thyroid cancer (110590).
• Ulcerative colitis. Oral selenium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A clinical study in patients with ulcerative colitis shows that taking a liquid supplement containing a combination of selenium, fish oil, fructo-oligosaccharides, acacia, vitamin E, and vitamin C daily for 6 months does not improve disease activity scores when compared with placebo. However, taking the combination supplement seems to reduce the need for oral prednisone for symptom control (13757). The effect of selenium alone is unclear. More evidence is needed to rate selenium for these uses.

(Read more about SELENIUM)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Osteoporosis. Higher dietary intakes of silicon in males and premenopausal females seem to be associated with higher bone mineral density (BMD), but it is unclear whether silicon supplements reduce the risk of osteoporosis. Details: Males and premenopausal females who have dietary intakes of silicon of at least 40 mg daily seem to have higher BMD than those with lower intakes. This could reduce the risk of osteoporosis (10470,12425). However, it is unclear if silicon supplements can reduce the risk for osteoporosis. Silicon intake has also been evaluated in postmenopausal females. Clinical and population-based research suggests that higher silicon intake does not seem to benefit postmenopausal females in general, although it may benefit those on hormone replacement therapy (10470,12425,75118,92135). Bone loss in postmenopausal females is primarily due to bone resorption. Silicon seems to affect only bone formation (12425).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Aging skin. It is unclear if oral silicon is beneficial in patients with aging skin. Details: A small preliminary clinical study in healthy volunteers aged 40-60 years shows that taking a specific product (Exsynutriment by Biotec) containing organic silicon 600 mg in hydrolyzed marine collagen once daily, 15 minutes before breakfast, for 90 days improves skin firmness, hydration, and texture, but not wrinkles, brightness, or softness, when compared with placebo (100837).
• Alzheimer disease. Although there has been interest in using oral silicon for Alzheimer disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of silicon for this condition.
• Androgenic alopecia. Although there has been interest in using oral silicon for androgenic alopecia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of silicon for this condition.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although there has been interest in using oral silicon for CVD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of silicon for this condition.
• Dental peri-implantitis. It is unclear if oral silicon is beneficial in patients with peri-implantitis. Details: A small, preliminary clinical study in patients aged 18-75 with peri-implantitis shows that a specific choline-stabilized orthosilicic acid product (BioSil, Bio Minerals NV) containing silicon 5 mg and choline 100 mg, taken twice daily for 12 months, does not improve markers of inflammation and periodontal disease (i.e. probing pocket depth, bleeding on probing) when compared with placebo (110028). However, this study may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference between groups. More evidence is needed to rate silicon for these uses.

(Read more about SILICON)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Cystic fibrosis. Long-term nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride improves lung function and reduces pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis show that, when taken along with a bronchodilator and other standard therapies, nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride in concentrations of 3% to 7%, up to 10 mL twice daily for 4 weeks, increases forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) when compared with isotonic saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) (26230,26230). This benefit was not seen at 48 weeks. Other clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis shows that inhaling sodium chloride 7%, 4 mL twice daily for 48 weeks, does not improve FEV1 when compared with isotonic saline. However, chronic treatment with hypertonic saline does reduce the number of pulmonary exacerbations and increase the number of patients without pulmonary exacerbations when compared with isotonic saline (29402). It is not clear if this benefit occurs in children with cystic fibrosis. The Pulmonary Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends that individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 6 years or older use nebulized hypertonic saline long-term to improve lung function, reduce the number of exacerbations, and improve quality of life (29403).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity. Oral sodium chloride seems to prevent nephrotoxicity associated with use of amphotericin B. Details: Clinical research shows that administering oral or intravenous sodium chloride 150 mEq daily during treatment with amphotericin B can attenuate the rise in serum creatinine levels and preserve renal function when compared to treatment with amphotericin B alone (26226).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Canker sores. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for canker sores, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Conjunctivitis. Although there is interest in using ophthalmic sodium chloride for conjunctivitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Hyponatremia. Although there is interest in using oral sodium chloride for hyponatremia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral sodium chloride for this condition.
• Pharyngitis. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for pharyngitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial for premature infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in infants born at less than 32 weeks' gestation shows that adding sodium 4 mEq/kg daily to enteral feedings, starting from the 7th day after birth and continuing through the 35th day, reduces the risk of developing hyponatremia and improves weight gain when compared with adding water (98180). More evidence is needed to rate sodium for these uses.

(Read more about SODIUM)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Dandruff. Sulfur is an FDA-permitted ingredient of over-the-counter (OTC) topical products to treat dandruff (88107). However, efficacy data from clinical trials is limited. In a study of 48 adults using shampoos containing sulfur 2%, salicylic acid 2%, or both ingredients twice weekly for 5 weeks, reductions in scaling and the number of desquamating cells per square centimeter were greater with any of the active treatments compared with the shampoo base alone. However, the combination of both ingredients produced significantly greater and earlier reductions than either active ingredient alone (88108).
• Scabies. Applying topical preparations of 5% to 20% precipitated sulfur in petrolatum appears to be effective for the treatment of scabies in some patients. Response occurs in 24% to 97% of patients, but is unpleasant due to the smell. Sulfur preparations are applied overnight (10-12 hours) for between 3 and 6 nights, with reduced efficacy when used for only 24 hours (27846,27847,88124,98205,98207). Concentrations should be limited to between 2% and 6% for infants, children, adolescents, and pregnant women (27846,27847,98207). Sulfur ointments have also been compared with other treatments for scabies. Clinical research and a meta-analysis of the available research show that topical sulfur is less effective and has a higher risk of adverse effects when compared with topical permethrin or topical or oral ivermectin (98205,100735). Sulfur ointment also seems to be more expensive when compared with topical permethrin or oral ivermectin (98207). Preliminary clinical trials and a meta-analysis have reported similar efficacy rates for topical sulfur and lindane, and for topical sulfur and benzyl benzoate (27848,100735).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Sulfur in concentrations of 3% to 10% is an FDA-permitted ingredient in over-the-counter (OTC) topical products to treat acne (88107,88123). However, efficacy data is mainly anecdotal (88122). Creams and ointments containing 1% to 10% sulfur have been used to treat acne for many decades, but sulfur is now generally found in combination with benzoyl peroxide, salicylic acid, or sodium sulfacetamide (88120,88121).
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). A preliminary clinical study suggests that using a homeopathic nasal spray containing sulfur, luffa, Galphimia glauca, and histamine for 42 days has similar efficacy to cromolyn sodium nasal spray for relief of symptoms of allergic rhinitis (60080).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Preliminary clinical research shows that inhalation of aerosolized sulfurous water (Acqua Breta, Terme di Riolo) 5 mL once daily for 12 days does not improve lung function when compared with baseline in patients with COPD (98206).
• Common cold. A preliminary clinical study suggests that taking a homeopathic product containing sulfur and German ipecac (Engystol, Heel GmbH) orally for up to 2 weeks during a cold provides similar symptomatic relief to conventional over-the-counter remedies such as antihistamines, antitussives, and NSAIDs (27849).
• Hyperlipidemia. A preliminary clinical study suggests that drinking 50 mL of water from a sulfurous spring three times daily for 4 weeks reduces total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride levels, and decreases platelet aggregability. However, the study has methodological problems, including the lack of a control group, and does not address the effects of sulfur alone (91101).
• Rosacea. Preliminary clinical research shows that applying sulfur 10% in an emollient base (Diprobase, Merck Sharp and Dohme) once daily for 4 weeks is as effective as oral tetracycline (300 mg twice daily for 1 week, then 150 mg twice daily for 3 weeks) for reducing rosacea papules and pustules (88113). Using a combination of sulfur 5% and sodium sulfacetamide 10% in a topical emollient foam (Clarifoam EF, Onset Dermatologics) twice daily also seems to reduce the severity of rosacea (88111,88112). Other clinical research shows that using this same product for 8 weeks reduces inflammatory lesions by an additional 42% and erythema by an additional 52% when compared with placebo (88112). In another study, using foam containing sulfur 5% and sodium sulfacetamide 10% for 8 weeks reduced papules, pustules, and overall severity of rosacea more than topical metronidazole 0.75% gel (88112). More evidence is needed to rate sulfur for these uses.

(Read more about SULFUR)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Vanadium deficiency. Oral vanadium is effective for the prevention of vanadium deficiency. Details: Taking vanadium is effective for preventing vanadium deficiency (7135).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Athletic performance. Although there has been interest in using oral vanadium for improving athletic performance, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vanadium for this purpose.
• Cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral vanadium for cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vanadium for this purpose.
• Diabetes. Small clinical studies suggest that high doses of oral vanadium may improve insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes; however, these high doses may be unsafe. It is unclear if lower doses of vanadium have the same effects. Details: Five very small clinical studies including fewer than 40 patients with type 2 diabetes show that taking high oral doses of vanadyl sulfate (50-75 mg twice daily; 31-46 mg elemental vanadium daily) for up to 6 weeks can improve hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity and might reduce blood glucose levels when compared to baseline (3055,3056,3057,12557,12558). However, prolonged use of these high doses might not be safe (7135). It is not known if lower doses have the same benefit.
• Hyperlipidemia. Although there has been interest in using oral vanadium for hyperlipidemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vanadium for this purpose.
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral vanadium is beneficial in patients with impaired glucose tolerance. Details: A very small clinical study in overweight or obese adults with impaired glucose tolerance shows that taking vanadyl sulfate 50 mg twice daily for 30 days does not improve insulin sensitivity or glucose metabolism when compared with placebo (92819).
• Tuberculosis. Although there has been interest in using oral vanadium for tuberculosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vanadium for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate vanadium for these uses.

(Read more about VANADIUM)

EFFECTIVE

• Vitamin C deficiency. Oral or intramuscular vitamin C is effective for preventing or treating vitamin C deficiency. Details: Administering vitamin C orally or intramuscularly prevents and treats vitamin C deficiency, including scurvy. Vitamin C administration can reverse complications of scurvy within 2 days to 3 weeks (4844). In newborns with transient tyrosinemia due to vitamin C deficiency, oral or intramuscular vitamin C can correct this condition (15).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Anemia of chronic disease. Oral vitamin C seems to improve markers of anemia in patients on hemodialysis. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research in hemodialysis patients with anemia shows that treatment with vitamin C 200-300 mg three times weekly for 3-6 months increases hemoglobin levels by approximately 0.9 grams/dL, increases transferrin saturation by about 8%, and decreases the required recombinant human erythropoietin dose by 17 U/kg weekly when compared with standard care (83447,83475).
• Atrial fibrillation. Oral and intravenous vitamin C seems to help prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgeries. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking vitamin C prior to and after cardiac surgery reduces the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation by 27% to 53%. Most studies administered vitamin C at doses of 1-2 grams orally daily for 1-3 days prior to cardiac surgery, followed by 1-2 grams in two divided doses daily for 4-5 days after cardiac surgery. Some studies provided vitamin C intravenously at similar doses, but oral vitamin C seems to be more effective (91233,96703,96705). Despite these findings, a meta-analysis of clinical research conducted only in the U.S. does not support the benefit of vitamin C for reducing postoperative atrial fibrillation (96703). These differences may be related to lifestyle factors such as nutrition, as well as differences in hospital treatments. Vitamin C has also been studied in combination with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) with evidence of benefit (90701).
• Bowel preparation. Powdered vitamin C is approved for use as part of a polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Details: Clinical research shows that treatment with 2 liters of oral solution containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus vitamin C achieves a similar quality of bowel cleansing as treatment with 4 liters of PEG when administered on the evening prior to colonoscopy or when administered in a split-dose regimen. Patients given 2 liters of PEG plus vitamin C solution also have better compliance and experience fewer adverse events, such as nausea, vomiting, or abdominal bloating, compared to patients treated with 4 liters of PEG solution without vitamin C (90413,90415,90420,90424,90428). This treatment also appears to be effective and tolerable in elderly patients aged 60-79 years, including those with poor bowel habits and a high number of comorbidities (108085). Other preliminary clinical research also shows that taking 1 liter of PEG plus vitamin C results in similar quality of bowel cleansing and adverse effects as sodium picosulfate 170 mL plus magnesium citrate (111297). The most common PEG plus vitamin C preparation used in clinical research is MoviPrep (Norgine BV), which contains macrogol 3350 100 grams, sodium sulfate 7.5 grams, sodium chloride 2.7 grams, potassium chloride 1 gram, vitamin C 4.7 grams, and sodium ascorbate 5.9 grams per liter of solution (90413,90415,90424). In the U.S., MoviPrep is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for bowel preparation prior to a colonoscopy.
• Common cold. Oral high-dose vitamin C might modestly reduce cold symptoms; however, taking vitamin C prophylactically does not seem to prevent the development of a cold. Details: There is substantial controversy about the effectiveness of vitamin C for treating the common cold (1969,1989,7100,9835,9836). The majority of evidence shows that taking high doses of vitamin C orally might decrease the duration of cold symptoms by 1-1.5 days in some patients (1966,1967,1968,1987,6458,7102,9832,83487). However, other studies have found no effect with doses up to 3 grams daily (9833). A meta-analysis of clinical research suggests that vitamin C supplementation decreases the incidence of cold in individuals exposed to physical stress, but not in the general population (83487). Other research suggests vitamin C may be more effective for treating cold symptoms in children than in adults. Also, there may be a dose-dependent response; doses of at least 2 grams daily seem to work better than 1 gram doses (9834). Taking vitamin C supplements prophylactically does not decrease the risk of catching a cold (1966,1967,1968,1987,3042,6458,7101,9832). Dietary intake of vitamin C also does not seem to affect the risk of getting a cold (10780).
• Complex regional pain syndrome. Most research shows that taking oral vitamin C after a wrist or distal radius fracture or after orthopedic surgery seems to reduce the risk of developing complex regional pain. Details: Although some research has found no benefit in patients with distal radius (i.e. wrist) fractures (90411,96702), most clinical research shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg daily, and possibly doses of up to 1500 mg daily, for 45-50 days beginning immediately after fracture can reduce the risk of developing complex regional pain syndrome (2045,16302,96700,96706). Reasons for discrepancies are unclear but might relate to differences in diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome (96702). Research in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery has also shown benefit with the use of vitamin C for the prevention of complex regional pain syndrome (90422,108076,108087). One meta-analysis of clinical research in patients undergoing wrist, foot, or ankle surgery shows that taking vitamin C 500-1000 mg for 42-50 days following surgery reduces the rate of complex regional pain syndrome, and may improve pain following ankle or foot surgery, when compared with placebo (108076). The validity of these findings is limited by the high heterogeneity of included trials. Another meta-analysis of clinical research in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery (i.e. wrist, knee, ankle, foot, lumbar, rotator cuff) suggests that oral and intravenous vitamin C may have similar effectiveness; however, this evidence is low quality (108087).
• Exercise-induced respiratory infections. High-dose oral vitamin C seems to reduce the risk of respiratory infections associated with strenuous exercise. Details: Some preliminary clinical research suggests that prophylactic use of vitamin C in doses of 600 mg to 1 gram daily for 3-8 weeks before heavy physical exercise, such as a marathon, might prevent upper respiratory infections that sometimes follow heavy exercise (9831,83370). More recently, high doses of vitamin C have been studied. A large clinical study in army recruits undergoing basic military training shows that taking vitamin C 6 grams daily for one month reduces the odds of getting a cold by 20% when compared with placebo (102975).
• Hypercholesterolemia. Oral vitamin C seems to reduce lipid levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg daily for at least 4 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by about 8 mg/dL and reduces triglycerides by about 20 mg/dL when compared with control (83445).
• Hypertension. Oral vitamin C seems to modestly reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Details: Vitamin C seems to modestly reduce systolic blood pressure, without meaningful effects on diastolic blood pressure (2044,9822,13162,83483,102974). A meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials in patients with hypertension, with or without other comorbidities, shows that taking a median dose of vitamin C 500 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces systolic, but not diastolic, blood pressure by about 5 mmHg. Some of the studies used vitamin C in combination with other supplements, such as vitamin E and magnesium. When studies assessing vitamin C alone were analyzed, the magnitude of reduction in systolic blood pressure decreased (83483). A newer meta-analysis of small clinical studies in patients with essential hypertension shows that taking vitamin C 200 mg or more daily reduces systolic blood pressure by about 4 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by about 2 mmHg (102974). However, this newer analysis omitted numerous relevant studies and included studies with normotensive patients and those without an adequate control, limiting the validity of its findings.
• Laser skin resurfacing. Topical vitamin C seems to reduce erythema occurring after cosmetic laser skin resurfacing procedures intended to reduce scars and wrinkles. Details: There is some evidence that an aqueous formulation of topical vitamin C can decrease the degree and duration of erythema following cutaneous carbon dioxide laser resurfacing for scar and wrinkle removal (1959).
• Lead toxicity. Dietary vitamin C seems to lower concentrations of lead in the blood. Details: Observational research has found that consuming more vitamin C from dietary sources is associated with lower blood concentrations of lead. People who consumed at least 340 mg of vitamin C daily as part of the diet had lower blood lead levels than those who consumed less than 100 mg vitamin C daily (3097,3098,3099).
• Nitrate tolerance. Oral vitamin C might prevent nitrate tolerance in some patients. Details: Small clinical studies show that taking vitamin C orally seems to prevent the development of nitrate tolerance in patients taking sublingual nitroglycerin. There is some evidence that short-term vitamin C supplementation can prevent tolerance to the vasodilatory effects of nitrates (1441,1961).
• Postoperative pain. Oral or intravenous vitamin C might prevent acute postoperative pain following certain surgeries. It is unclear if vitamin C reduces chronic postoperative pain. Details: A meta-analysis of 7 small clinical studies in adults undergoing elective surgery shows that receiving perioperative vitamin C, either as 1 gram orally, 2-3 grams intravenously, or 50 mg/kg intravenously, modestly reduces acute pain and opioid requirements for up to 24 hours when compared with control (105457). Most surgeries were laparoscopic and included cholecystectomy, colectomy, hysterectomy; two non-laparoscopic surgeries included uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with tonsillectomy and major abdominal surgery (90418,99840,105457). A meta-analysis of clinical trials in adults undergoing noncardiac surgery (i.e., orthopedic, abdominal, gynecologic, kidney transplantation) shows that administering perioperative vitamin C, either orally or intravenously, reduces postoperative intravenous morphine requirements at 2, 24, and 48 hours after surgery and improves pain scores at 2, 6, and 24 hours after surgery when compared with placebo. The dose of vitamin C did not appear to impact outcomes. However, when only laparoscopic surgeries are included, perioperative vitamin C does not improve pain or morphine use when compared with placebo (108087). A moderate-sized clinical study in adults undergoing transurethral resection of a bladder tumor under general anesthesia shows that administering intravenous vitamin C 1 gram after induction of anesthesia reduces the incidence and severity of catheter-related bladder discomfort immediately after surgery and at 1 and 2 hours postoperatively, but not 6 hours, when compared with placebo. However, vitamin C does not reduce postoperative pain scores or analgesic requirements when compared with placebo (111645). Further research is needed to determine the effects of vitamin C for acute postoperative pain. Vitamin C has also been evaluated for reducing chronic pain after surgery. Clinical research in patients undergoing surgery for foot or ankle trauma shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg orally twice daily postoperatively for 6 weeks reduces pain scores when compared with placebo at 2 weeks and 6 weeks. The mean total amount of diclofenac used for pain relief over the 6-week period is also reduced, from 5.7 grams with placebo to 3.4 grams with vitamin C (102131).
• Wrinkled skin. Topical vitamin C might reduce the appearance of existing wrinkles. Details: Topical preparations containing vitamin C seem to improve the appearance of wrinkled skin. Some evidence shows that vitamin C 3% applied for 12 weeks might reduce facial wrinkles (14008). A small clinical study shows that applying a dissolving microneedle patch containing vitamin C 5.6% every 4 days for 12 weeks to crow's feet on one side of the face reduces wrinkles when compared to control treatment applied on the other side of the face (98780). Other clinical research in females aged 30-60 years shows that applying an oil-soluble cream containing the vitamin C derivative tetra-isopalmitoyl ascorbic acid 1%, 2%, or 3% to the periorbital area twice daily for 8 weeks reduces visual wrinkle grading when compared with placebo. A dose analysis shows greater improvements in wrinkle parameters, average wrinkle depth, and mean depth with the lower concentration, while greater improvements in maximum roughness and maximum depth are observed with the higher concentration (108072). This study only included individuals defined as having Fitzpatrick skin type III or IV; it effects on other skin types is unclear. Preparations containing vitamin C in combination with other ingredients have also been investigated. A small low-quality trial in females with moderately photodamaged and hyperpigmented facial skin shows that applying a moisturizer with vitamin C 30%, vitamin E, and coenzyme Q10 once daily in the morning, along with applying retinol 0.5% once daily or once every other day for 12 weeks, seems to improve skin tone, photodamage, and wrinkles when compared to baseline (99085). In another small trial, a topical preparation containing vitamin C 10% as L-ascorbic acid along with acetyl tyrosine, zinc sulfate, sodium hyaluronate, and bioflavonoids (Cellex-C High Potency Serum) applied to photo-aged facial skin for 3 months improves fine and coarse wrinkling, yellowing and sallowness, roughness, and skin tone when compared with placebo (6155). It is unclear if the beneficial effects of these products are due to vitamin C, other ingredients, or the combination.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Acute bronchitis. Oral vitamin C doesn't seem to improve symptoms of acute bronchitis. Details: A clinical study in adults with acute bronchitis shows that taking vitamin C orally 500 mg on day 1, then 250 mg on days 2 through 5 (similar to an azithromycin regimen) doesn't seem to have any effect on quality of life or bronchitis duration when compared with azithromycin (9827).
• Asthma. Oral vitamin C doesn't seem to prevent asthma or improve lung function. Details: Although some observational research has found that some patients with asthma might have lower serum vitamin C levels (5873), other observational research found that increased dietary vitamin C intake is not associated with a reduced risk of asthma or improved lung function (15006,34567). In addition, clinical research shows that supplemental intake of vitamin C does not reduce asthma symptoms, improve lung function, or reduce the use of inhaled steroids in asthma patients (90409).
• Atherosclerosis. Oral vitamin C does not seem to reduce the progression of atherosclerosis. Details: A clinical study shows that taking a specific combination product containing slow-release vitamin C 250 mg and vitamin E 136 IU (CellaVie, Ferrosan A/S) twice daily modestly slows the 3-year progression of atherosclerosis of the carotid artery in males, but not females. This result persisted at a 6-year follow-up of this study (1918,10473). However, when this form of vitamin C is used alone, it does not slow the 3-year progression of atherosclerosis of the carotid artery (1918).
• Bladder cancer. Oral vitamin C does not reduce the risk of bladder cancer or mortality from bladder cancer. Details: Epidemiological research has found that supplemental vitamin C intake is not associated with mortality rate in patients with bladder cancer (9839). A secondary analysis of a large clinical trial, the Physicians' Health Study II, in healthy men aged at least 50 years also shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg daily alone or with vitamin E 400 IU daily for up to 10 years does not reduce the risk of developing bladder cancer or bladder cancer-related deaths when compared with placebo (90097).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral vitamin C does not seem to be beneficial for either primary or secondary CVD prevention. Details: Vitamin C does not seem to be beneficial for primary prevention of CVD. Some population research has found that higher supplemental vitamin C or dietary vitamin C has been associated with a reduced risk of developing CVD (10358,14108,109779), while other observational research has found no benefit (34566,10358,14108). However, meta-analyses of clinical research in healthy patients show that vitamin C supplementation does not prevent CVD or coronary heart disease when compared with control (97308,104025). In 2004, the American Heart Association stated that current evidence does not justify use of antioxidants such as vitamin C for reducing the risk of CVD (12142). Evidence is also negative for secondary prevention in people with coronary heart disease. Population studies have found that higher serum vitamin C was associated with no effect or decreased CVD mortality from CVD (3910,5878). A meta-analysis of two large clinical trials shows that vitamin C supplementation does not reduce CVD events or CVD mortality when compared with control (97308).
• Colorectal cancer. Oral vitamin C does not seem to prevent colorectal cancer. Details: Population research has found that dietary vitamin C intake is not associated with a reduced risk of developing colon cancer. When total vitamin C intake from food and supplements is considered, there is a modest association (34600). However, most clinical trials show that supplemental vitamin C, alone or along with other antioxidants, does not reduce the risk of colorectal cancer development, colorectal cancer or adenoma recurrence, or colorectal cancer-related mortality (34580,34581,34594,90097,90089,92903).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Oral vitamin C, even at high doses, does not seem to speed recovery from COVID-19 in non-hospitalized patients. An analysis of clinical research suggests that oral or intravenous vitamin C might reduce mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19; however, given that nearly all individual studies are small and do not show benefit, larger and higher-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings. Details: A clinical study in adult outpatients with confirmed COVID-19 shows that taking oral vitamin C (ascorbic acid) 8000 mg in 2-3 divided doses daily, alone or with zinc gluconate 50 mg daily, for 10 days does not reduce symptom severity when compared with standard care (104450). The study was terminated prior to complete enrollment due to futility and apparent lack of effect from vitamin C and/or zinc supplementation. Limitations of this study include a lack of placebo control and blinding. Additionally, this study has been criticized for methodologic concerns (106624). Another small clinical trial in adult outpatients with confirmed COVID-19 shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg daily for 14 days does not improve symptoms or quality of life when compared with placebo (109462). Vitamin C has also been evaluated in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Individual prospective and retrospective studies in critically ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in various countries have found that administering vitamin C, either enterally as 500-1000 mg daily or intravenously as 8-24 grams daily or 50 mg/kg daily, does not significantly reduce in-hospital or short-term mortality, hospital length of stay, or end-organ failure when compared with control groups receiving standard care alone. Additionally, all but one study found no change in the need for mechanical ventilation (105458,105465,106937,106938,108075,108079,108081). One small study found a small improvement in survival rate when compared with standard care; however, the overall survival rate in this study was low (108075). Additionally, one clinical study in patients hospitalized in Turkey with COVID-19 shows that adding high-dose intravenous sodium ascorbate 50 mg/kg to a treatment regimen of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and zinc may improve recovery time, with 57% and 39% of patients achieving total recovery at day 15 in the vitamin C and control groups, respectively (108071). However, the validity of this trial is limited due to unclear reporting. Additionally, these small studies were likely underpowered to detect differences between the vitamin C and control groups. A meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials and 9 observational studies in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 shows that receiving oral or intravenous vitamin C daily reduces the odds of in-hospital mortality by 41% when compared with control. When only clinical trials were considered, the odds of in-hospital mortality were decreased by 56%; however, this reduction was only identified in studies using vitamin C 10 grams daily or less. Conversely, supplementation with vitamin C increased the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay by nearly 2 days and did not impact length of hospital stay or reduce the need for mechanical ventilation, liver injury, or cardiac injury (109955). Given that most individual studies in this analysis did not show improvements in mortality with vitamin C, larger and higher-quality prospective studies are needed to determine the role of vitamin C in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Vitamin C has also been evaluated in patients with long COVID. Preliminary clinical research in adults with long COVID and persistent fatigue shows that taking a specific combination product containing vitamin C 500 mg and L-arginine 1.66 grams (Bioarginina C, Farmacetici Damor) for 28 days increases 6-minute walk test distance by 10% and reduces self-reported fatigue when compared with placebo (110390).
• Fetal and premature infant mortality. Oral vitamin C does not seem to prevent neonatal death. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking vitamin C alone or with other supplements does not reduce the risk of neonatal death (83472,96707).
• Fractures. Oral vitamin C does not seem to improve fracture healing. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg daily for 50 days following an acute distal radial fracture does not improve physical function, symptoms, or healing rates when compared with placebo (90411).
• Helicobacter pylori. Oral vitamin C does not seem to improve eradication of H. pylori. Details: Most clinical research shows that treatment with vitamin C, alone or in combination with vitamin E, does not improve the eradication rate of H. pylori when taken with a standard eradication regimen when compared with the eradication regimen alone (83476,90094).
• Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy. Oral vitamin C does not seem to improve neuropathy in these patients. Details: In a meta-analysis of five studies in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A, taking vitamin C 1-4 grams orally daily for 1 year did not improve neuropathy when compared with placebo (99084). Continuing vitamin C 4 grams daily for 2 years also does not improve neuropathy in these patients (90419).
• Interferon-related retinopathy. Oral vitamin C does not seem to improve retinopathy associated with interferon therapy. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving interferon therapy shows that taking vitamin C 600 daily orally does not seem to reduce the risk of retinopathy from interferon therapy when compared with control (10355).
• Leukemia. Oral vitamin C does not seem to reduce the risk of leukemia or mortality from leukemia. Details: A large clinical trial in men aged at least 50 years shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg daily, alone or along with vitamin E 400 IU daily, for up to 10 years does not reduce the risk of developing leukemia or leukemia-related deaths when compared with placebo (90097).
• Low birth weight. Oral vitamin C does not seem to reduce the risk of infants being born with a low birth weight. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that maternal use of oral vitamin C alone or with other supplements does not reduce the risk of giving birth to infants with low birth weight when compared with control (83450,83472).
• Lung cancer. Oral vitamin C does not seem to reduce the risk of lung cancer. Details: Two meta-analyses of clinical research suggest that taking vitamin C, alone or in combination with vitamin E, does not reduce the incidence of lung cancer or lung cancer-related mortality (34528,34632). Also, a clinical study in females shows that taking supplemental vitamin C 500 mg daily, with or without vitamin E and beta carotene, is associated with an INCREASED risk of lung cancer when compared with placebo (34580).
• Melanoma. Oral vitamin C does not seem to reduce the risk of melanoma. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg daily, alone or along with vitamin E 400 IU daily, for up to 10 years does not reduce the risk of developing melanoma or melanoma-related deaths when compared with placebo in men aged at least 50 years (90097).
• Miscarriage. Oral vitamin C does not seem to reduce the risk of miscarriage. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin C alone or with other supplements does not reduce the risk of miscarriage when compared with control (94820).
• Overall mortality. Oral vitamin C does not reduce overall mortality. Details: Although population research suggests that higher dietary intake and higher plasma vitamin C levels are associated with a reduced risk of mortality from all causes (3910,109779), vitamin C supplementation does not seem to affect overall mortality. Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking vitamin C supplements does not reduce overall mortality when compared with control (34622,111641). Clinical studies of vitamin C used in combination with vitamin E, beta carotene, and/or selenium and zinc, also show no benefit for overall mortality (9817,14109).
• Pancreatic cancer. Oral vitamin C does not seem to prevent pancreatic cancer. Details: Observational research has found that increased dietary vitamin C intake is associated with up to a 30% reduced risk of pancreatic cancer (99083,99086). However, clinical research shows that supplemental vitamin C 500 mg daily does not reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer in females (34580). Also, taking vitamin C in combination with beta-carotene plus vitamin E does not reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer (12185,34581).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral vitamin C does not seem to prevent pre-eclampsia. Details: Despite some early positive research in high-risk pregnancies, the majority of meta-analyses and clinical studies show that taking vitamin C alone or with vitamin E or other supplements does not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia when compared with control. There is even some concern that vitamin C supplementation may increase the risk of gestational hypertension (3236,83450,83472,83474,96707).
• Preterm labor. Oral vitamin C does not seem to prevent preterm labor. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking vitamin C alone or with other supplements does not reduce the risk of preterm labor when compared with control (83450,83472,96707).
• Prostate cancer. Oral vitamin C does not seem to prevent prostate cancer. Details: A large-scale clinical study (The SU.VI.MAX study) shows that a combination of vitamin C 120 mg, vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) 30 mg, beta-carotene 6 mg, selenium 100 mcg, and zinc 20 mg, taken daily for an average of 8 years, does not reduce the risk of prostate cancer overall. However, it might reduce the risk of prostate cancer in those who have normal PSA levels. It does not seem to be beneficial for reducing the risk of prostate cancer in patients with PSA levels above 3 mcg/L (14135). Another large scale study (Physician's Health Study II) shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg daily for an average of 8 years does not significantly reduce the risk of prostate cancer when compared with placebo (16708). Similarly, results from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial seem to show that supplemental or dietary intake of vitamin C does not reduce the risk of prostate cancer when compared to individuals not taking vitamin C (14124).
• Radiation dermatitis. Topical vitamin C does not seem to prevent radiation dermatitis in cancer patients. Details: A small clinical study shows that applying a 10% vitamin C solution does not appear to protect from radiation dermatitis when applied to the scalps of patients treated with radiation for intracranial tumors (789).
• Small for gestational age (SGA). Oral vitamin C does not seem to reduce SGA. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking vitamin C alone or with other supplements does not reduce the risk of small for gestational age birth when compared with control (83450,83472).
• Stillbirth. Oral vitamin C does not seem to prevent stillbirth. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that maternal use of vitamin C alone or with other supplements does not reduce the risk of stillbirth when compared with control (83472,96707).

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Sepsis. Intravenous vitamin C, alone or in combination with thiamine and/or hydrocortisone, does not prevent organ failure, reduce intensive care or hospital length of stay, or reduce mortality in sepsis or septic shock. Details: Observational research suggests that patients with septic shock are more likely to have low plasma levels of vitamin C (100317). However, two randomized clinical trials in patients with sepsis show no benefit with intravenous vitamin C, with or without thiamine, for improving organ function and preventing organ failure when compared with control treatment (102130,104027). A clinical study in patients with septic shock shows that administering an intravenous bolus of vitamin C 1000 mg followed by a continuous infusion of 250 mg/hour for 96 hours, starting within 24 hours of vasopressor initiation, does not improve 28-day or intensive care unit (ICU) mortality when compared with placebo. A subgroup analysis shows that the addition of corticosteroids does not affect outcomes in either group (108078). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. Also, a larger clinical trial in adults with sepsis receiving vasopressor therapy in the ICU shows that intravenous administration of vitamin C 50 mg/kg every 6 hours for up to 4 days increases the risk of death or persistent organ dysfunction at day 28 by 14% to 21% when compared with placebo. There were no differences in mortality at 6 months (109459,111643). Vitamin C has also been frequently studied in patients with sepsis and septic shock in a specific combination regimen (HAT therapy) which includes intravenous vitamin C 1.5-2 grams with hydrocortisone 50 mg every 6 hours and thiamine 200 mg every 12 hours. While some retrospective research has found HAT therapy to be beneficial in sepsis (100315,102980), high quality, prospective clinical research has not confirmed these findings (105447,106620,109956). Several meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials in patients with sepsis or septic shock show that intravenous vitamin C, either alone, as a component of HAT therapy, or in combination with thiamine, does not reduce short- or long-term mortality, ICU or hospital length of stay, kidney injury, or duration of mechanical ventilation, but modestly improves duration of vasopressor use and procalcitonin clearance, when compared with placebo or standard care. These analyses also show mixed results with respect to improvement in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores within 72 hours (105447,106620,106935,108073,109460,111298,111300,111301,111642). Most studies included in the analyses administered HAT therapy for 2-10 days and compared it with normal saline control or with hydrocortisone alone (102129,102998,104027,104028,104032,105446). Although some subgroup analyses suggests that intravenous vitamin C alone in patients with sepsis may improve short-term mortality (106620,111298), other meta-analyses have not shown this benefit in subgroup analyses (111300). In addition, meta-analyses have identified significant publication bias (111298,111300). Long-term follow up from a study in patients with sepsis-induced respiratory and/or cardiovascular dysfunction shows that receiving HAT therapy does not improve cognitive, psychological, or functional status after 6 months and, for some domains, HAT therapy was worse when compared with placebo (111299). Studies evaluating intravenous vitamin C, either alone, as a component of HAT therapy, or in combination with thiamine, in mixed critically ill populations have also shown mixed findings. One such large meta-analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials and 21 observational studies shows that intravenous vitamin C reduces in-hospital mortality by 19% and ICU stay by about 1 day, but does not have a significant effect on hospital stay, mortality at 1 month, ICU mortality, or kidney injury, when compared with placebo or standard care. Also, effects on in-hospital mortality were no longer significant when data from randomized controlled trials were considered alone (106933). Other meta-analyses including 15-16 randomized controlled trials show that intravenous vitamin C, alone or as a component of HAT therapy, does not reduce overall, ICU, or in-hospital mortality when compared with control (106934,109957). A subgroup analysis in one of these analyses suggests that intravenous vitamin C as monotherapy, or in doses of at least 10 grams daily, may improve overall mortality (106934).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Atrophic acne scars. It is unclear if applying topical vitamin C after microblading improves atrophic acne scars. Details: A clinical study in adults with mild to severe atrophic acne scarring shows that applying a serum containing vitamin C 17% to the face after a once-monthly home microblade treatment for 4 months improves the appearance of acne scars at month 5 when compared with baseline (108086). Although this study enrolled a control group that used topical insulin in place of vitamin C, no between-group statistical comparisons were conducted, limiting the validity of this study.
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Most clinical research shows that taking the antioxidants vitamin C 500 mg, vitamin E 400 IU, and beta-carotene 15 mg daily, with or without elemental zinc 80 mg, reduces the risk of visual acuity loss by 23% to 27% and reduces the risk of progression to advanced AMD at 5 years by 25% to 32% in patients at high risk for developing advanced AMD (7303,7304,11326,90069). The antioxidant plus zinc combination seems to reduce the risk of progression to advanced AMD in these patients more than taking the antioxidants without zinc (7303,90069). There is not enough evidence to know if taking the antioxidants or antioxidants plus zinc prevents progression to advanced AMD in patients with early stage AMD (7303,7304). The effect of vitamin C intake on developing AMD is unclear. Some population studies have found no association between dietary or supplemental vitamin C intake on risk of developing AMD (14007,14257). In one population study, vitamin C intake was associated with increased odds of developing age-related maculopathy (9823); however, in another population study, intake of vitamin C along with other antioxidants and zinc was associated with a reduced risk of AMD (14257). More evidence is needed to determine what role, if any, vitamin C intake has on the risk of developing AMD.
• Aging skin. Topical vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in females aged 30-65 years shows that applying a specific liquid (Antioxidant and Collagen Booster Serum, Max Biocare Pty Ltd.) containing vitamin C 20%, red raspberry leaf cell culture extract 0.0005%, and vitamin E 1% to the face nightly for 8 weeks, in addition to regular facial skin products, improves skin color, elasticity, radiance, smoothness, and appearance of wrinkles when compared with regular facial skin products alone (102355).
• Albuminuria. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking vitamin C 1250 mg plus vitamin E 680 IU daily for 4 weeks can reduce the excretion of albumin by about 19% when compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (10434).
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial in patients with hay fever. Details: Epidemiological research has found that higher vitamin C plasma levels are not associated with a decreased risk of allergic rhinitis (15200). However, clinical research shows that some forms of vitamin C might help. In one small clinical study, intranasal vitamin C administered three times daily for 2 weeks reduces nasal secretions, nasal blockage, and edema in up to 74% of patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (15201). Another small clinical study in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis shows that taking a single oral dose of vitamin C 2 grams reduces bronchial responsiveness to histamine at one hour after ingestion (15202). However, in another small study in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis taking vitamin C orally in doses up to 4 grams daily for 3 days does not appear to suppress cutaneous or nasal response to histamine when compared to placebo (15203).
• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if dietary vitamin C helps to prevent this condition. Details: Most epidemiological research has found that dietary intake of vitamin C is associated with a 17% reduced risk of developing Alzheimer disease (4636,9824,10131,13165,90082).
• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to prevent ALS. Details: Observational research has found that increased dietary or supplemental intake of vitamin C is not associated with risk of developing ALS (90412).
• Anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin C for anthracycline-induced cardiac toxicity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin C for this condition.
• Aspirin-associated gastric damage. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to prevent gastric damage caused by aspirin. Details: Some clinical research shows that vitamin C 480 mg might prevent gastric damage associated with taking aspirin 400 mg by decreasing blood loss and preventing decreased gastric blood flow (10357). However, a small clinical study in healthy patients shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg as ascorbic acid with aspirin 600 mg actually increases gastrointestinal permeability to a greater extent than either ingredient taken alone (98781).
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral vitamin C improves athletic performance. Details: Although some small preliminary clinical studies suggest that vitamin C might improve certain biomarkers during exercise (82922), a meta-analysis of small clinical trials in older and younger adults shows that taking vitamin C 500-1000 mg daily, with or without vitamin E, does not improve endurance, lean mass, or muscle strength when compared with placebo (102973). A more recent, small clinical study in recreationally trained males shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg and vitamin E (as alpha-tocopherol) 235 mg daily for 10 weeks while participating in a resistance training program does not improve measures of muscle strength when compared with placebo (109959).
• Atopic disease. It is unclear if dietary vitamin C helps to prevent atopic disease. Details: Population research has found that higher intake of vitamin C is not associated with a reduced risk of eczema, wheeze, IgE-mediated food allergy, or allergic sensitization (90098).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Small clinical studies suggest that high-dose oral vitamin C may not improve symptoms in patients with ADHD. Details: Some research suggests that taking megadose vitamins, including vitamin C, does not improve ADHD symptoms (9957,9958,9959). However, other preliminary clinical research shows that taking 25 mg of vitamin C in combination with flaxseed oil providing alpha-linolenic acid 200 mg twice daily might improve measures of attention, impulsivity, restlessness, and self-control in children with ADHD when compared with baseline (14443). It is not clear if these effects are due to vitamin C, flaxseed oil, or the combination.
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial in patients with autism spectrum disorder. Details: One small clinical study shows that taking vitamin C 8 grams per 70 kg daily for 10 weeks modestly reduces autism symptom severity in school children when compared with placebo (83604).
• Bleeding. It is unclear if intravenous vitamin C can reduce bleeding after total abdominal hysterectomy. Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy shows that administration of intravenous vitamin C 1 gram the night before surgery and 1 gram during surgery reduces postoperative hemorrhage volume by around 40 mL when compared with placebo (109465).
• Brain tumor. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to prevent brain tumors. Details: Population research has found that vitamin C intake is associated with a 14% reduced risk of glioma. This risk reduction was more prevalent in America compared to other geographic locations (98782).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to prevent breast cancer, its recurrence, or breast cancer-related mortality. Details: Some epidemiological research has found that dietary vitamin C is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (1444,10823,10824). However, other epidemiological research has found no association with dietary or supplemental vitamin C (10825,10826,108080). One cohort study found no association between breast cancer risk and total, dietary, or supplemental vitamin C, regardless of dose, treatment duration, or formulation (single ingredient or combination product). Additionally, hormone and menopausal status did not appear to impact risk. Vitamin C intake might be associated with a reduced risk in individuals with a family history of breast cancer in first-degree relatives (108080). In patients with breast cancer, supplemental or dietary intake of vitamin C might be associated with a reduced risk of mortality. A meta-analysis of results from population research shows that vitamin C supplementation following breast cancer diagnosis is associated with a 15% lower risk of breast cancer-related mortality when compared with no supplementation (90416). A large, observational study in patients with breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy has found that vitamin C supplementation does not reduce the risk of breast cancer recurrence over a period of 5 years when compared with no supplementation. Although the vitamin C group had notably less aggressive tumor types, recurrence-free survival was similar in both vitamin C and control groups (108082). The validity of these findings is limited due to unknown doses of vitamin C and the inclusion of various breast cancer subtypes.
• Burns. Small studies suggest that intravenous vitamin C may modestly improve symptoms in patients with severe burns. Details: A small clinical study in patients with severe burns shows that administering vitamin C intravenously (IV) 66 mg/kg hourly over 24 hours, as part of fluid resuscitation using lactated ringer solution, reduces wound edema and the volume of fluid needed when compared with fluid resuscitation alone (83145). A retrospective review of adults hospitalized with severe burns has found that those who receive a continuous IV infusion of at least 10 grams of vitamin C within 2 days of admission have an in-hospital mortality rate of 46%, compared with 58% for those who do not receive vitamin C (102128).
• Cancer. It is unclear if oral or intravenous vitamin C helps to prevent cancer or cancer-related mortality. Details: Some population research has found that DIETARY intake of vitamin C is linked with a lower risk of cancer and cancer-related mortality (3910,5878,10819,109779). However, clinical research shows that taking vitamin C SUPPLEMENTS does not reduce the risk for cancer (10819,14109,34580,90097). In people with cancer, although some clinical research has shown that taking high-dose vitamin C supplements can improve survival rates (9809,96704), other clinical research has not shown this benefit (4842,4843). In 2003, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that it would allow a qualified health claim stating that some scientific evidence suggests that antioxidant vitamins, such as vitamin C, may reduce the risk of certain forms of cancer. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence supporting this claim (102334). Preliminary clinical research has also evaluated vitamin C supplements in patients with cancer. High-dose oral vitamin C, 10 grams daily, in patients with advanced cancer does not seem to improve survival or decrease disease progression (4842,4843,106617). However, preliminary clinical research suggests high doses of vitamin C, given intravenously, might have a beneficial effect on some outcomes, including survival rate in some patients with cancer (9809,96704,106617). However, there is no benefit to other patients studied in the case reports and this has not been tested in well-designed clinical trials (9809,96704).
• Cataracts. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to prevent cataracts. Details: Population research has found that people with the highest total intake of vitamin C have about a 19% reduced risk of developing cataracts when compared with those with the lowest total intake. The greatest benefit is observed for nuclear cataracts (96711). A separate study found that higher supplemental intake of vitamin C for 10 years is associated with a 60% reduction in the incidence of nuclear and cortical cataracts (4208). Other population research has found that the highest blood levels of vitamin C are associated with a 33% reduced odds of developing age-related cataract, but any benefit seems to be limited to Asian populations (90944). One prospective clinical study shows that taking vitamin C plus vitamin E and beta-carotene does not prevent the development or progression of age-related loss of vision due to cataracts in well-nourished people taking the supplement for an average of 6.3 years (7304).
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to prevent cervical cancer. Details: Observational research has found that higher vitamin C intake is associated with a 33% to 42% reduced odds of cervical neoplasm. Increasing vitamin C intake by 50 mg daily is associated with an 8% reduced odds of cervical neoplasm (34609,98771).
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there is interest in using oral vitamin C for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin C for this condition.
• Colistin-induced nephrotoxicity. It is unclear if intravenous vitamin C helps to prevent nephrotoxicity from colistin. Details: A small clinical study shows that intravenous administration of vitamin C 2 grams every 12 hours along with colistin for around 9-10 days does not prevent nephrotoxicity when compared with colistin therapy alone (99839). However, this study was limited by a lack of statistical power to detect differences between the study groups.
• Contrast induced nephropathy. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Details: Some clinical research shows that taking vitamin C before and after coronary angiography reduces the risk of developing CIN by 33% to 55% when compared with placebo in patients with renal dysfunction (12234,90421). However, other clinical evidence published since 2012 suggests that vitamin C given orally and/or intravenously before and after angiography does not reduce the risk of CIN compared with control in high-risk patients with chronic renal insufficiency or diabetes (91232,91236,90410,90425). Reasons for the discrepancies are not entirely clear. However, it is possible that the lack of significant benefit from vitamin C in the latter studies results from the fact that incidences of CIN have become less common than in the past due to avoidance of dehydration, use of smaller catheters, and use of contrast agents with reduced nephrotoxicity (90429).
• Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. It is unclear if intravenous vitamin C helps to improve patient outcomes after CABG surgery. Details: A small clinical study shows that giving vitamin C 5 grams intravenously (IV) before anesthesia induction and 5 grams in the cardioplegia solution used during surgery shortens the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) by about 8 hours (102127). However, some limited research suggests that IV vitamin C does not resolve cardiac surgery complications. A small clinical study in patients with vasoplegia after receiving CABG and other cardiac surgeries shows that receiving IV vitamin C 1.5 grams every 6 hours after being admitted to the ICU does not improve vasoplegia when compared with control (102981).
• Delirium. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Observational research in adults with septic shock has found that receiving intravenous thiamine 400 mg daily with vitamin C 6 grams daily, both in divided doses, is not associated with reduced delirium when compared with control (103001).
• Dental plaque. It is unclear if vitamin C in a chewing gum helps to reduce dental plaque formation. Details: A small clinical study in patients with calculus shows that chewing 10 pieces of gum, each containing 60 mg of vitamin C, daily for 3 months reduces the formation of dental calculus, visible plaque, and the number of bleeding sites when compared not chewing gum (83303). The validity of this finding is limited by a lack of placebo group.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of depression. Details: A small clinical study in children and adolescents shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg orally twice daily in combination with fluoxetine 10-20 mg daily for 6 months reduces most symptoms of major depressive disorder when compared with taking fluoxetine alone (90404). However, a small clinical study in adults shows that taking vitamin C up to 1000 mg daily for 2 months does not improve the response rate or decrease symptoms of depression in adults also taking citalopram when compared with citalopram alone (96708). Reasons for these conflicting results may relate to the age of the patients, study duration, or differences in antidepressant medication being taken. One clinical guideline also provisionally recommends against the use of oral vitamin C to treat patients with depression based on low-quality evidence (110318). Some research has also evaluated vitamin C intake for the prevention of depression. A secondary analysis of pre- and peri-menopausal adults enrolled in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) program suggests that vitamin C intake is inversely associated with depressive symptoms. This association persisted regardless of age, race, physical activity, body mass index, antidepressant use or menopausal status (108083). The validity of these findings is limited due to the secondary nature of this study; additionally, follow-up time is unclear.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral vitamin C prevents diabetes. Some low-quality research suggests that vitamin C might improve glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Details: Population research has not found a link between dietary vitamin C and the risk of developing type 2 diabetes (14004). However, low certainty clinical research has found some benefit of taking vitamin C supplements for glycemic control. A meta-analysis of 16 small heterogeneous clinical studies in patients with diabetes shows that taking vitamin C 250-3000 mg daily for 2-30 weeks might reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by an average of 0.5% when compared with placebo. This effect estimate was rated as having very low certainty. Subgroup analyses suggest that longer study durations show greater glycemic benefit, although there was no dose-response relationship identified (105461). Some research has evaluated the effects of vitamin C supplementation on the lipid profile in patients with diabetes, with mixed findings. One meta-analysis of 17 small clinical studies shows that taking vitamin C 200-3000 mg daily for 2 to 48 weeks improves levels of triglycerides and total cholesterol, but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Subgroup analysis suggests that study durations of at least 12 weeks show greater benefit (106621). However, two other meta-analyses in patients with diabetes, one of 16 small heterogenous clinical studies and one of 11 small clinical studies, show no clinically important improvement in lipid levels after vitamin C supplementation (105461,105464).
• Dry mouth. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with vitamin E; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancer shows that taking vitamin E 100 IU and vitamin C 500 mg twice daily for an average of 3 months improves dry mouth when compared to baseline (99080). The validity of these results is limited by the lack of comparison with a control group.
• Endometrial cancer. Increased dietary vitamin C has been linked to reduced risk of endometrial cancer. Details: Population research has found that intake of vitamin C from dietary sources is associated with a slightly decreased risk of endometrial cancer when compared with control. However, this benefit is not observed when results from a prospective cohort study are assessed (34578).
• Endometriosis. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with vitamin E; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with endometriosis and pelvic pain shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg and vitamin E 800 IU daily for 8 weeks improves dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain scores when compared with placebo. Vitamin C and vitamin E supplementation also reduces some biochemical markers of oxidative stress when compared with placebo (106622).
• Endoscopy-associated adverse effects. It is unclear if a topical vitamin C spray reduces mucosal irritation in patients undergoing Lugol chromoendoscopy. Details: A small clinical trial in patients receiving a Lugol chromoendoscopy shows that spraying a vitamin C 2% solution after the application of the Lugol iodine 2% solution reduces the severity of mucosal irritation, heartburn, and pain when compared with using a normal saline spray after the Lugol iodine 2% solution (104030).
• Esophageal cancer. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin C is associated with reduced odds of esophageal adenocarcinoma. A 50 gram increase in dietary vitamin C intake is associated with a 13% reduced odds of esophageal cancer (34551,98770). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking a vitamin C supplement in combination with beta-carotene and vitamin E does not reduce the risk of esophageal cancer (34581).
• Exercise-induced asthma. Small clinical studies suggest that oral vitamin C may modestly improve symptoms in patients with exercise-induced asthma. Details: A meta-analysis of the available clinical research shows that vitamin C supplementation might reduce exercise-induced breathlessness when compared with placebo or control. However, the available research is of poor quality, and no clear conclusions can be drawn regarding its benefits for exercise-induced asthma (90409).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial in exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A small clinical study in healthy females shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg before moderate intensity cycling does not prevent muscle damage when compared with placebo (99837). Another small clinical study in endurance-trained runners shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg and vitamin E (as alpha-tocopherol) 235 mg 2 hours prior to an exercise protocol does not reduce delayed onset muscle soreness or improve other markers of exercise-induced muscle damage when compared with placebo (109961).
• Gallbladder disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin C reduces the risk of gallbladder disease. Details: Cross-sectional epidemiological evidence has found that vitamin C supplementation and increased vitamin C serum levels are associated with a decreased risk of developing gallbladder disease in females, but not males (5877).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if dietary or supplemental vitamin C reduces the risk of gastric cancer. Details: Most population research has not found an association between DIETARY intake of vitamin C and gastric cancer risk (9194,10822,10819,90083). Also, clinical research shows that taking vitamin C supplements in combination with other antioxidants does not reduce the risk of gastric cancer or precancerous gastric lesions (14447,34581,90085). However, some research suggests that it might be associated with a reduced risk for specific forms of gastric cancer (9838,90083). One clinical study shows that taking vitamin C orally 500 mg daily for 6 months after eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection decreases the incidence of precancerous changes in stomach tissue when compared with no treatment (10359). Also, other clinical research shows that taking vitamin C orally 1 gram daily helps promote the regression of precancerous gastric lesions in people at high risk for gastric cancer (2579). In 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that it would allow a qualified health claim stating that vitamin C supplements may reduce the risk of gastric cancer. However, the FDA has concluded that it is highly uncertain that vitamin C supplements actually reduce the risk of gastric cancer (102332).
• Gastritis. There is limited evidence on the oral use of vitamin C in omeprazole-induced corpus gastritis. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking vitamin C orally 1200 mg daily along with omeprazole decreases corpus gastritis associated with omeprazole therapy in patients with H. pylori infection (10360).
• Gout. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to prevent or manage gout. Details: Population research in men has found that taking vitamin C 500-1500 mg daily from the diet and/or supplements is associated with up to a 34% reduced risk of gout when compared with less than 250 mg daily (16755). Also, men who ingest over 500 mg of vitamin C daily from the diet and supplements have serum uric acid levels that are slightly lower than men who consume less than 90 mg daily (16820). However, taking supplemental vitamin C 500 mg daily for 8 weeks does not seem to lower serum uric acid levels in patients who already have gout (90423).
• Hearing loss. There is limited evidence on the intravenous use of vitamin C in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. It is unclear if dietary vitamin C intake can affect the risk of hearing loss. Details: A small clinical study in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss shows that receiving intravenous high-dose vitamin C 200 mg/kg daily in combination with steroid therapy for 10 days, followed by oral vitamin C 2000 mg daily for 30 days, increases recovery rate two-fold and modestly improves hearing threshold levels when compared with receiving steroid therapy only (90417). In addition, population research in females has found that high dietary intake of vitamin C is associated with a 22% increased risk of developing self-reported hearing loss over a 22-year period when compared with low intake (109807).
• Heart transplant complications. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial shows that a combination of vitamin C 500 mg and vitamin E 400 IU, taken twice daily for 1 year starting within the first 2 years after cardiac transplant, reduced the progression of vasculopathy as measured by intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) when compared with placebo. This suggests that the combination may help slow the progression of CAV (82826).
• Hepatitis C. It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial in patients with hepatitis C. Details: A small clinical study in patients with confirmed hepatitis C shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg daily with conventional therapy (sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir) for 4 weeks improves serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, and albumin when compared with conventional therapy alone (109463).
• HIV/AIDS. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small, low-quality study in men with HIV shows that taking vitamin C 250 mg daily in combination with vitamin A, beta-carotene, vitamin E, selenium, and coenzyme Q10 does not improve viral load, although it seems to improve markers of oxidative stress when compared to baseline. However, a 1000 mg dose of vitamin C, as well as higher doses of the other antioxidants, do not seem to provide any additional effect (9830).
• HIV transmission. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A clinical study in HIV-positive mothers shows that taking vitamin B, vitamin C, and vitamin E daily during pregnancy and while breast-feeding for 20 weeks seems to reduce child mortality and HIV transmission through breast milk when compared with taking vitamin A (9801).
• Hyperphosphatemia. Intravenous vitamin C might be beneficial for reducing phosphate levels in patients with end-stage renal disease. Details: A small clinical study in hemodialysis patients with elevated phosphorus levels suggests that administering vitamin C 500 mg intravenously three times weekly for 8 weeks reduces phosphorus levels about seven-fold when compared with placebo (90414).
• Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, shows that taking a combination of vitamin C 250 mg every other day, vitamin D 50,000 IU daily, and vitamin E 200 IU daily for 12 weeks improves some, but not all, measures of lung function and reduces markers of inflammation and oxidative stress when compared to baseline (109464). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of placebo control group.
• Infertility. It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial in anovulatory females. Details: A very small clinical study suggests that taking vitamin C 400-1000 mg daily might improve fertility, resulting in ovulation and pregnancy in some anovulatory females, when compared with baseline (14018). The validity of these findings is limited by the small study size and lack of a comparator group.
• Male infertility. It is unclear if oral or intravenous vitamin C is beneficial in males with infertility. Details: A meta-analysis of three small, low-quality clinical trials in males with infertility shows that taking vitamin C up to 1000 mg daily for up to 12 weeks can improve sperm count, motility, and vitality, but does not seem to increase semen volume or sperm concentration, when compared with control (109461). It is unclear if vitamin C can increase pregnancy rates, as these studies did not assess this outcome. A retrospective study in males with or without varicocele-related infertility has found that taking a specific combination product containing vitamin C 90 mg, zinc 10 mg, L-carnitine fumarate 1725 mg, acetyl-L-carnitine 500 mg, coenzyme Q10 20 mg, folic acid 0.2 mg, selenium 0.05 mg, and vitamin B12 0.015 mg (Proxeed Plus, Sigma-Tau) orally twice daily for 6 months improves sperm count, sperm concentration, and sperm motility when compared with baseline. Improvement in semen parameters were greatest in subjects with more severe varicoceles. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group (111296).
• Melasma. It is unclear if topical vitamin C is beneficial in patients with melasma. Details: A small clinical study in patients with bilateral symmetrically distributed facial melasma shows that topical application of 0.5 mL of vitamin C (Cosmotech, Alpha Medical Cosmotech) following dermapen microneedling every 2 weeks for 6 weeks is similarly effective to tranexamic acid for improving melasma severity and pigmented, but not vascular, findings on dermoscopic examination (106939).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial in patients with NAFLD. Details: A clinical study in patients with NAFLD shows that taking vitamin C 250 mg, 1000 mg, or 2000 mg daily for 12 weeks improves some biochemical markers of liver health and glucose metabolism when compared with baseline. However, the improvement from baseline was similar between groups (106942).
• Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research suggests vitamin C in combination with vitamin E might improve hepatic fibrosis in patients with NASH. However, it does not seem to decrease liver inflammation (14005).
• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is unclear if oral vitamin C reduces the risk of developing diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Details: In one population study, higher dietary or supplemental intake of vitamin C was associated with a reduced risk of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, when compared with lower intake in postmenopausal adults (90945).
• Oral cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin C reduces the risk of developing oral cancer. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin C is associated with a reduced risk of oral cancer (10821). However, clinical research has not shown benefit with oral vitamin C supplements. A small clinical trial in Japanese adults with oral leukoplakia shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg and beta-carotene 10 mg daily for 12 months does not reduce the development of oral cancer over 5 years when compared with vitamin C 50 mg daily (91384).
• Oral leukoplakia. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in Japanese adults with oral leukoplakia shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg and beta-carotene 10 mg daily for 12 months does not improve leukoplakia symptoms or reduce the development of oral cancer over 5 years when compared with vitamin C 50 mg daily (91384).
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if dietary vitamin C reduces the risk of developing osteoarthritis. Details: Observational research has found that increased vitamin C from dietary sources is associated with a reduced risk of cartilage loss and disease progression in people with osteoarthritis (5881).
• Osteoporosis. It is unclear if dietary vitamin C improves bone density or reduces fracture risk in patients at risk for osteoporosis. Details: Some cross-sectional observational research in postmenopausal patients without a history of smoking or estrogen use has found that higher serum vitamin C levels are associated with lower bone mineral density (9828). However, other observational research in a larger population of adults at risk for osteoporosis has found that higher dietary vitamin C intake is not associated with fracture risk (104415).
• Ovarian cancer. Dietary vitamin C might not affect the risk of ovarian cancer. Details: Epidemiological research has found that dietary vitamin C intake is not linked with ovarian cancer risk (9193,102977).
• Pancreatitis. It is unclear if intravenous vitamin C is beneficial in patients with acute pancreatitis. Details: A small meta-analysis of clinical studies in patients with acute pancreatitis shows that intravenous vitamin C does not improve the odds of developing organ failure when compared with placebo or no intervention. Intravenous vitamin C seems to reduce hospital stay, but not in-hospital mortality (106941).
• Parkinson disease. Dietary vitamin C might not affect the risk of developing this condition. Details: Observational research has found that moderate or high dietary intake of vitamin C is not associated with a reduced risk of Parkinson disease (83316).
• Periodontitis. It is unclear if dietary vitamin C reduces the risk of periodontitis. Details: Observational research in US adults has found that individuals with dietary intake of vitamin C in the third quartile, but not the second or fourth quartiles, have lower odds of periodontitis when compared with vitamin C intake in the lowest quartile. Furthermore, the investigators identified a non-linear relationship between vitamin C intake and periodontitis risk, suggesting that individuals with intakes either much lower or much higher than 158 mg daily are at increased risk of developing periodontitis (109958).
• Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). It is unclear if dietary vitamin C helps to reduce the risk of developing PAD. Details: In females, epidemiological evidence has found that dietary intake of vitamin C of 142 mg daily or greater is associated with a 36% reduced risk of PAD when compared with lower intake levels of less than 80 mg daily (10130).
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to improve physical performance and muscle strength in older people. Details: Population research has found that higher intake of dietary vitamin C is associated with improved physical performance and muscle strength in elderly people (14006). In contrast, a small clinical study in elderly men undergoing strength training shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg and vitamin E 258IU daily for 12 weeks does not increase strength, and might even attenuate increases in muscle mass, when compared with strength training alone (96701).
• Pneumonia. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to prevent pneumonia. Details: A meta-analysis of two small, low-quality clinical studies in children shows that vitamin C does not seem to reduce the occurrence of pneumonia when compared to control (104033).
• Postoperative recovery. It is unclear if oral or intravenous vitamin C improves postoperative recovery. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that oral or intravenous vitamin C can shorten the duration of hospitalization after cardiac surgery when compared with control (91233,96703). However, other research shows no decrease in intensive care or hospital stay with vitamin C supplementation (96705). A meta-analysis of 37 clinical trials in adults undergoing low- to high-risk noncardiac surgery (i.e., orthopedic, abdominal, gynecologic, or kidney transplantation), shows that receiving perioperative vitamin C, either orally or intravenously, does not improve duration of hospitalization or overall mortality when compared with control (108087). There's also some limited evidence that vitamin C might reduce postoperative pulmonary complications such as lung infection, pleural effusion, and pneumothorax. A small clinical trial in low-risk cardiac surgery patients shows that receiving intravenous vitamin C 1 gram 10 minutes after anesthesia might slightly reduce the rate of postoperative pulmonary complications when compared with receiving a saline injection (104034).
• Premature rupture of membranes (PROM). Oral vitamin C seems to reduce the risk of PROM in some patients; however, the addition of oral vitamin E seems to negate any benefit. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin C alone decreases the risk of both term and preterm PROM by 45% and 34%, respectively, when compared with placebo or control (96707). Also, a more recent clinical study in patients with a history of PROM shows that taking vitamin C 100 mg daily, starting at 14 weeks' gestation, increases the gestational age at recurrent PROM by around 1 week and increases the gestational age at birth by around 1.3 weeks when compared with placebo (109960). Taking vitamin C in combination with vitamin E, however, does not seem to reduce the risk of term or preterm PROM; some research suggests that it might even increase the risk of non-preterm PROM (83472,96707). However, other research shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg plus vitamin E 400 IU daily, beginning at 24 to 34 weeks gestation and continuing until delivery, may help increase the latency period until delivery by 5 days and increase gestational age at delivery by almost 1 week when compared with placebo in patients with preterm PROM (90078).
• Pressure ulcers. It is unclear if oral vitamin C, when used alone or in combination with other ingredients, can improve the healing of pressure ulcers. Details: A small clinical study in institutionalized patients with pressure ulcers shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg twice daily for 12 weeks does not improve wound closure or increase healing rates when compared with vitamin C 10 mg twice daily (83617). Oral vitamin C has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients for the treatment of grade II-IV pressure ulcers. Two small clinical studies in hospitalized patients with pressure ulcers shows that administering an oral nutritional supplement enriched with vitamin C, L-arginine, and zinc improves ulcer healing when compared with a standard diet (31953,87173). Also, clinical research in patients living in long-term care facilities shows that taking an oral nutritional supplement enriched in protein, vitamin C, L-arginine, and zinc daily for 9 weeks reduces ulcer area and decreases oozing when compared to baseline (32045). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Radiation proctopathy. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with vitamin E; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chronic radiation proctitis shows that vitamin C 500 mg plus vitamin E 400 IU three times daily might improve symptoms when compared with baseline (9825). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Renal cell carcinoma. It is unclear if increased dietary intake of vitamin C helps to reduce the risk of renal cell carcinoma. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of vitamin C is associated with a 12% reduced risk of renal cell carcinoma (98779).
• Respiratory tract infections. It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial for preventing respiratory tract infections or reducing the duration of these infections. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in children and adults shows that, when compared with placebo, oral vitamin C supplementation reduces the average number of symptomatic days per individual, but does not reduce the average symptom days per respiratory episode. Also, vitamin C intake does not reduce the incidence or severity of respiratory disease or improve recovery in hospitalized patients with respiratory tract infections (108077). The validity of this trial is limited by the high heterogeneity of included studies, which evaluated various vitamin C regimens, ranging from 100 mg to 8 grams daily, as preventive therapy or as an adjuvant to active treatment. A clinical study in children aged 3-10 years shows that taking vitamin C 50 mg in combination with a specific product (Lab4) containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis daily for 6 months reduces the incidence of cough and sore throat by 16% and 20%, respectively, when compared with placebo. However, it did not improve total symptoms, nasal congestion, nasal discharge, or sneezing. Also, aside from a 33% reduction in the average number of days with a sore throat, daily supplementation does not reduce the duration of individual symptoms or total symptoms (106943). It is unclear if these effects are due to vitamin C, the probiotics, or the combination.
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to reduce symptoms of stress. Details: A small clinical study in hemodialysis patients with RLS shows that taking vitamin C 200 mg daily, alone or in combination with vitamin E 400 mg, for 8 weeks reduces the severity of RLS when compared with placebo (90093). More research is needed to determine if vitamin C is beneficial in treating RLS that is not associated with hemodialysis.
• Sunburn. Topical and oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking vitamin C orally in combination with vitamin E seems to prevent ultraviolet (UV) radiation-induced erythema (sunburn) (4715,4716). Vitamin C in combination with high dose oral RRR-alpha-tocopherol (natural vitamin E) seems to protect against skin inflammation after exposure to UV radiation (4715). Also, applying topical vitamin C in combination with topical vitamin E and melatonin seems to provide modest photoprotective effects when used prior to UV exposure. However, it has no effect when used during or after UV exposure (4713,4714).
• Stress. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to reduce symptoms of stress. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults shows that taking vitamin C 3000 mg daily for 14 days modestly reduces blood pressure and subjective stress response to psychological stress when compared with placebo (10353).
• Stroke. Observational research has found that although taking vitamin C supplements does not seem to be beneficial, eating more vitamin C-rich food is linked with reduced risk of stroke. Details: Lower plasma levels of vitamin C have been associated with increased stroke risk (90408). Additionally, population research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin C is associated with a 8% to 19% reduction in stroke risk when compared to lower intake (90408,109779). This reduction appears to be dose-dependent, with each 100 mg/day increase in dietary vitamin C intake associated with about a 17% reduction (90408). However, taking vitamin C supplements has not been found to be associated with reduced stroke risk (1449,90408).
• Tetanus. It is unclear if intravenous vitamin C helps to reduce symptoms of tetanus. Details: A low quality clinical trial in children and young adults with tetanus shows that intravenous vitamin C 1 gram daily along with conventional treatment reduces fatality when compared to control (21539).
• Tooth extraction. It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial for reducing pain or improving healing after tooth extraction. Details: A small clinical study in healthy patients aged 14-41 years who are undergoing bilateral premolar extraction shows that taking vitamin C 200 mg three times daily, beginning immediately after extraction and continued for 10 days, improves pain on days 1-3, and may reduce mesio-distal wound size between days 1 and 7, when compared with placebo, but not when compared with vitamin C 500 mg three times daily. A dose of 500 mg three times daily did not improve pain scores or extraction wound healing when compared with placebo (108084). The validity of this trial is limited by the short duration of treatment; additionally, this study did not report baseline vitamin C levels.
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Although there is interest in using oral vitamin C for UTIs, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin C for this condition.
• Vascular dementia. It is unclear if oral vitamin C reduces the risk of vascular dementia. Details: Population research has found that supplemental intake of vitamin C and vitamin E is associated with a reduced risk of vascular dementia in Japanese-American men (4636). However, when cases in which dementia was diagnosed prior to the study are excluded from data analysis, intake of vitamin C and vitamin E is not associated with a reduced risk of vascular dementia in these patients (9824).
• Wound healing. It is unclear if oral vitamin C improves the healing of chronic foot ulcers. It is also unclear if intravenous vitamin C improves healing of surgical wounds after total abdominal hysterectomy. Details: A very small clinical study in adults with chronic foot ulcers shows that taking slow-release vitamin C 500 mg daily for 8 weeks seems to result in a median of 100% ulcer healing, compared with a median of 14% ulcer healing in patients taking glucosamine 1000 mg daily (105456). This finding is limited due to the small and heterogeneous patient population, which included patients with diabetes, vascular disease, and/or vitamin C deficiency. Another small clinical study in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy shows that administration of intravenous vitamin C 1 gram the night before surgery and 1 gram during surgery does not reduce the rate of surgical site infection or wound dehiscence when compared with placebo (109465). However, this study may not have been adequately powered to detect differences between groups. More evidence is needed to rate vitamin C for these uses.

(Read more about VITAMIN C)

EFFECTIVE

• Familial hypophosphatemia. Oral vitamin D in combination with phosphate is effective for bone disorders in patients with familial hypophosphatemia. Details: Taking calcitriol or dihydrotachysterol orally in combination with phosphate supplements is effective for treating bone disorders in people with familial hypophosphatemia (11818).
• Hypoparathyroidism. Oral calcitriol increases serum calcium concentrations in people with hypoparathyroidism or pseudohypoparathyroidism. Details: Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) is effective in high doses for increasing serum calcium concentrations in people with hypoparathyroidism or pseudohypoparathyroidism (11820). Also, taking vitamin D (form unspecified) or calcitriol postoperatively is effective for preventing hypocalcemia in people with hypoparathyroidism due to thyroidectomy (39045).
• Osteomalacia. Oral vitamin D is effective for osteomalacia. Details: Oral calcifediol is effective for treating osteomalacia secondary to liver disease (hepatic osteodystrophy) and anticonvulsant-induced osteomalacia. Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) is effective for osteomalacia due to malabsorption syndromes, Fanconi syndrome, and corticosteroid-induced osteomalacia (11819,11821).
• Renal osteodystrophy. Oral calcitriol prevents renal osteodystrophy in patients with chronic renal failure. Details: Taking calcitriol orally manages hypocalcemia and prevents renal osteodystrophy in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing dialysis (11823).
• Rickets. Oral vitamin D prevents and treats rickets. Details: Vitamin D is effective for preventing and treating rickets, a consequence of vitamin D deficiency. Calcitriol should be used in patients with renal failure (11824).
• Vitamin D deficiency. Oral vitamin D prevents and treats vitamin D deficiency. Details: Vitamin D is effective for preventing and treating vitamin D deficiency using a wide range of doses (7555,16888,16891,17476). Optimal blood levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for maintaining bone density is controversial; however, it is typically estimated that blood levels of 20-100 ng/mL are needed. Toxicity usually does not occur until levels exceed 150 ng/mL (17476,93945). Vitamin D also alleviates symptoms and syndromes associated with vitamin D deficiency. Administering vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) intramuscularly or orally seems to help treat severe proximal myopathy associated with severe vitamin D deficiency. Several case reports suggest vitamin D therapy can provide prompt relief of muscle weakness and restore mobility (11923,84348,84687).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral vitamin D prevents corticosteroid-induced osteopenia and osteoporosis. Details: Taking calcifediol, cholecalciferol, calcitriol, or alfacalcidol orally prevents corticosteroid-induced osteopenia and osteoporosis (7555,83933). Vitamin D3 metabolites, including calcitriol and alfacalcidol, seem to be more effective at preventing bone loss compared to cholecalciferol in these patients, although the vitamin D3 metabolites seem to be inferior to bisphosphonates (83955). Furthermore, taking activated vitamin D or other forms of vitamin D alone or along with calcium improves bone mineral density in people with corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (38493,38581).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate intake of vitamin D in conjunction with adequate calcium intake helps to prevent the progression of osteoporosis. It might also reduce the risk of a first fracture in some patients. However, its place in the prevention of secondary facture is unclear. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate vitamin D intake of 800-1000 IU daily along with adequate calcium intake for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake, with a target serum vitamin D level of 30 ng/mL (109425). In the US, foods that contain at least 120 IU vitamin D can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate vitamin D intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (97001). However, vitamin D supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Clinical research shows that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) and calcium can decrease postmenopausal bone loss, help prevent osteoporosis, and decrease the risk of fractures (10932,12926,12930,12934,12952) (38973,39015,39026,84003). According to one analysis, taking oral vitamin D3 700-800 IU daily with or without calcium reduces fracture risk in ambulatory and institutionalized elderly people (12933). Other analyses suggest that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol, ergocalciferol, calcifediol, calcitriol, or alfacalcidol with or without calcium can reduce the risk of all fractures by up to 17%, nonvertebral fractures by up to 49%, and hip fractures by up to 30% in older adults. However, the incidence of vertebral fractures does not appear to be reduced with vitamin D supplementation (38942,38970,38973,39015,39026,84660,109053). Despite the majority of research showing benefit, some studies have not found a positive effect of vitamin D on fracture risk. Some analyses of clinical evidence, including patients with and without osteoporosis, show that taking vitamin D3 or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) alone does not reduce fracture risk, suggesting that adequate calcium intake is needed for any benefit to be realized (39015,84471). Also, some evidence suggests that vitamin D3 400 IU daily is not effective for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in elderly nursing home residents (109053). Another clinical trial found that taking vitamin D3 800 IU daily with calcium 1200-1500 mg daily for 2 years does not increase bone mineral density (BMD) in Black postmenopausal adults. This may be due to the fact that Black females have a lower rate of bone remodeling, an increased calcium absorption efficiency, and reduced calcium excretion when compared with other ethnic groups; therefore, supplementation with vitamin D3 and calcium might not be as beneficial in these patients (16878). There is concern that vitamin D might not be effective for secondary prevention of fractures in elderly patients. In elderly adults who have had a previous osteoporotic fracture, vitamin D3 800 IU daily with or without calcium 1000 mg daily for 2-5 years does not reduce fracture risk when compared with placebo (13073). Another study also shows that taking vitamin D3 800 IU and calcium 1000 mg daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (under 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). However, these studies have been criticized for failing to measure vitamin D levels and low adherence to study protocol (12931). Also, one of these studies did not use a placebo control (12929). Taking alfacalcidol orally seems to maintain BMD in prostatic carcinoma patients at risk for osteoporosis when treated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-a). Alfacalcidol maintains, but does not increase, BMD in these patients (6360).
• Psoriasis. Topical vitamin D or vitamin D analogues improve symptoms of psoriasis. This benefit is not seen with oral vitamin D. Details: Topical application of vitamin D in the form of calcitriol or other vitamin D analogues, such as calcipotriene, maxacalcitol, and paricalcitol, effectively treats plaque psoriasis in some patients, including those with chronic plaque psoriasis (11822,84325). Applying topical vitamin D or its analogues in combination with topical corticosteroids such as betamethasone seems to be more effective for treating plaque psoriasis than either agent used alone (22283,82572,84325,84536,84647). However, oral vitamin D does not seem to prevent psoriasis or improve symptoms of psoriasis in general (11822,22283,82572,84325,84536,84647,98193,108426). An analysis of a large clinical study in older adults with mild psoriasis shows that taking a vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) loading dose of 200,000 IU followed by vitamin D3 100,000 IU monthly for 1 year does not affect the severity or spread of psoriasis when compared with placebo (98193).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Some research suggests that oral vitamin D reduces symptoms of allergic rhinitis in children and adults. It is unclear if oral vitamin D during pregnancy is beneficial for the prevention of allergic rhinitis in the child. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with allergic rhinitis and vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks along with cetirizine improves overall symptom severity when compared with placebo and cetirizine. This improvement was not significant at 4 weeks, suggesting that symptom improvement might not occur until vitamin D has been adequately replenished (102120). In children ages 5-15 years, four small- or moderate-sized clinical trials show that taking vitamin D 800 IU or 1000 IU daily for 1-6 months modestly reduces symptoms such as nasal congestion and rhinorrhea when compared with placebo or no supplementation. It is unclear whether these children had vitamin D deficiency at baseline (109728). Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy has also been evaluated. A meta-analysis of three large clinical studies shows that prenatal vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of the child developing allergic rhinitis when compared with low-dose vitamin D, placebo, or no intervention (108438).
• Dental caries. Some research suggests that oral vitamin D reduces the risk of dental caries in children. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research suggests that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) reduces the risk of cavities by 49%, and vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) reduces the risk by 36% when compared with placebo in infants, children, and adolescents (84690). The validity of this finding is limited by the heterogeneity of the included trials. Also, clinical research shows an inverse correlation between cord blood vitamin D status and the number of decayed primary teeth in the infant at 12 months of age (104620). However, this same research shows that taking two oral prenatal doses of vitamin D2 50,000 IU during pregnancy does not prevent dental caries in the infant at 12 months of age or increase vitamin D levels in the cord blood (104620).
• Heart failure. Limited research suggests that oral vitamin D reduces the risk of developing heart failure in some patients. However, vitamin D does not seem to improve outcomes in patients that have already developed heart failure. Details: Population research has found that vitamin D levels below 15 ng/mL are associated with increased risk of developing heart failure (16615). A meta-analysis of 17 trials, including the landmark Randomized Evaluation of Calcium Or vitamin D (RECORD) trial, shows that vitamin D reduces the risk of heart failure by 21% compared to not taking vitamin D in patients 60 years or older (91343). This finding is limited because none of the included trials were designed to determine effects on cardiovascular outcomes. In contrast, a secondary analysis of data from the Women's Health Initiative trial shows that taking vitamin D 400 IU with calcium 1000 mg daily is not associated with a reduced risk of heart failure in postmenopausal adults. However, a subgroup analysis of that trial shows that taking vitamin D plus calcium is associated with a 37% lower risk of developing heart failure in postmenopausal adults classified as low-risk for heart failure at baseline. It is speculated that high-risk patients might not benefit from vitamin D plus calcium due to negative interactions with medications used to manage cardiovascular risk factors in this group (97307). While vitamin D might be associated with a reduced risk of developing heart failure, most evidence suggests that vitamin D is not beneficial in patients already diagnosed with heart failure. In one small clinical trial, taking vitamin D3 50,000 IU weekly along with calcium citrate 800 mg daily for 6 months was not associated with an improvement in 6-minute walk test, timed get up and go test (TGUG), electrocardiographic variables, or health status when compared with placebo in adults with heart failure; mortality was not evaluated (97299,97300). In another clinical trial, taking vitamin D3 2000 IU daily did not decrease the risk of mortality when compared with placebo in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2 heart failure patients (16620).
• Hyperparathyroidism-related bone loss. Limited evidence suggests that oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with this condition. Details: Taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) orally seems to help decrease secondary hyperparathyroidism and bone turnover in females. In one study, supplementation with vitamin D3 increased serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, reduced levels of parathyroid hormone, and decreased production of markers of bone turnover (3463).
• Respiratory tract infections. Oral vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk for respiratory tract infections in children. However, this benefit is not seen with the use of prenatal vitamin D supplements, or in adults taking vitamin D. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the treatment of respiratory tract infections. Details: Prenatally, increased levels of vitamin D during pregnancy have been associated with a lower incidence of childhood respiratory tract infections (98197). However, two meta-analyses of small clinical studies and one meta-analysis of large clinical studies show no effect of prenatal vitamin D supplementation on the incidence of infant or childhood respiratory tract infections, including lower respiratory tract infections, when compared with control. Results related to risk of wheeze are conflicting (95910,95912,108438). In children, most research shows that vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of respiratory infections. A meta-analysis of clinical trials in children aged 1-16 years shows that taking vitamin D decreases the odds of having a respiratory tract infection by about 29% when compared with control, although this study also identified a high likelihood of publication bias (105721). Daily or weekly vitamin D doses seem to be more beneficial than single bolus doses, although the largest meta-analysis failed to confirm this result (84689,93766,105721). One clinical study in preterm Black infants shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 200 IU daily and then 400 IU daily until 6 months of age does not affect the rate of respiratory tract infections, but does reduce wheeze by 11%, when compared with a normal diet without vitamin D supplementation (98191). This study may not have been powered to detect a difference in respiratory tract infection between groups. In adults, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to reduce the risk of respiratory infections. Observational research in adults has found that low levels of vitamin D are associated with worsened respiratory tract infection complications, and even increased mortality from respiratory tract infections in older adults ages 50-75 years (103659). However, meta-analyses of prospective clinical trials in adults show that taking vitamin D supplements 300-4000 IU daily for 7 weeks to 5 years does not reduce the odds of developing a respiratory infection or severe respiratory complications, such as emergency department utilization, hospitalization, and death, when compared with placebo. These results were similar in subgroup analyses evaluating overall vitamin D dose and baseline vitamin D status (84689,105721). The largest single clinical trial, conducted in adults at least 60 years of age, shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 60,000 IU once monthly for up to 5 years reduces the duration of total and severe respiratory symptoms by approximately 0.5 days, but does not reduce the incidence of respiratory illness or hospitalization, when compared with placebo (105726,110825). A large meta-analysis of clinical studies in both children and adults shows that taking vitamin D does not reduce the risk of acute respiratory infections. While subgroup analyses revealed a reduced risk of acute respiratory infection in studies not exceeding 11 weeks' duration and with daily supplementation, these beneficial effects only persisted in studies considered to be of low quality (108435). Baseline vitamin D status was not assessed and the validity of these findings is limited by publication bias. Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the treatment of acute respiratory infections. A large meta-analysis of clinical studies in both children and adults shows that taking vitamin D improves outcomes (e.g., sputum conversion, survival rate, therapeutic success, need for intensive care admission) by a small, but not clinically relevant, amount. In subgroup analyses, these beneficial effects only persisted in studies considered to be of low quality (108436). The validity of these findings is limited by publication bias.
• Tooth retention. Oral vitamin D with calcium seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily along with calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Most research shows that taking vitamin D with or without calcium does not reduce the risk of CVD or CVD complications. There is some speculation that there might be modest benefit in the elderly, but more research is needed to confirm. Details: Population research has found that low vitamin D levels, especially those below 15 ng/mL, are associated with an increased risk of developing CVD (15630,16618,93944). However, taking vitamin D supplements does not seem to prevent CVD. The majority of evidence from clinical research, population research, and meta-analyses shows that vitamin D supplementation, with or without calcium, does not reduce the risk of mortality, myocardial infarction, cardiac-related hospitalizations, or stroke when compared with placebo in patients with or without CVD risk factors (91343,97296,97305,97308,98902,98916,99762,109729,110811,110827)(112021,112022). The most reliable evidence comes from two recent meta-analyses of mainly high-quality clinical research investigating the effect of supplementation with vitamin D alone or with calcium for at least 1 year. These analyses show that vitamin D does not reduce major adverse cardiovascular events, stroke, CVD mortality, or all-cause mortality, regardless of baseline vitamin D level, vitamin D dosage, sex, formulation, or concomitant calcium supplementation (99762,109729). One large clinical trial in individuals at increased CVD risk shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol 60,000 IU monthly modestly INCREASES the risk of CVD- and presumed CVD-related mortality (110827). However, in some research, taking vitamin D 700-1000 IU daily shows a trend towards lower CVD events and reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in elderly patients (11931,98916,99762). Larger, high-quality trials with prespecified primary outcomes are needed to determine whether or not vitamin D supplementation reduces CVD risk in elderly populations.
• Critical illness (trauma). Taking vitamin D 540,000 IU as a single oral dose does not reduce death or hospital stay in critically ill patients. However, limited research suggests that taking a smaller dose of vitamin D long-term might have a modest benefit. Details: The most robust evidence to date shows that correcting vitamin D levels in critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency does not reduce mortality rate or duration of hospital stay. A large, multicenter clinical study in critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency shows that administering a single, enteral dose of vitamin D 540,000 IU does not reduce 90-day all-cause mortality, duration of hospital stay, ventilator-free days, or other clinical outcomes when compared with placebo (103656). A previous meta-analysis of clinical research showed that vitamin D supplementation administered for a duration of 7 days or up to 6 months reduces the risk of death by 30% in critically ill hospitalized patients (95913). However, included studies were of low methodological quality, had high heterogeneity, assessed patients with and without vitamin D deficiency, and used variable vitamin D dose regimens and administrations methods (95913,95914).
• Fractures. Most evidence shows that oral vitamin D alone does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. Some research shows that taking vitamin D with calcium prevents fractures; however, more research is needed to determine who is most likely to benefit. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin D alone does not seem to prevent fractures in older adults. Most adults in these studies did not have osteoporosis, although osteoporosis status was unclear in some research (10140,12933,14282,38970,39015,84660,95822,97296,102145,104619)(109059,110827). However, several meta-analyses suggest that taking higher doses of vitamin D (about 800 IU daily) in combination with calcium might reduce overall fracture risk in older patients (38942,38970,39015,84660,102145,110809). One meta-analysis of clinical research in community- or long-term care-living males and females at least 65 years of age shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily in combination with calcium reduces the risk of hip and non-vertebral fractures by 25% and 20%, respectively, compared with placebo (110809). However, discrepancies exist which are possibly related to the dose and form of calcium used in combination with vitamin D and/or the patient population. Some research shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily in combination with calcium 1200 mg daily as tricalcium phosphate reduces fracture risk by up to 31% while taking vitamin D with calcium carbonate does not reduce fracture risk (12929,14282,16878,110809). Some individual clinical studies in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years show that taking vitamin D plus calcium daily for 2-7 years does not prevent fractures when compared with placebo (14282,16878). Other confounding variables include the possible additional effects of hormonal therapy when given with calcium to postmenopausal adults and/or the inclusion of institutionalized patients with unclear osteoporotic status (95822,97296). Most research shows that taking vitamin D in combination with omega-3 fatty acids does not prevent fractures. A large clinical study shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily alone or with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily and/or strength training three times weekly does not prevent fractures in adults over 70 years of age when compared with placebo (104619). Another large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily, alone or with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, over approximately 5 years does not prevent overall fractures, nonvertebral fractures, or hip fractures in adults over 50 (males) or 55 (females) years old when compared with placebo. Although the osteoporosis status of the population was unclear, findings were consistent in adults at high fracture risk based on use of osteoporosis medications and/or a history of fragility fractures (109059). As of April 2018, the US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends against supplementing with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less along with calcium 1000 mg daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal adults. The USPSTF also concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with doses of vitamin D greater than 400 IU daily along with calcium doses greater than 1000 mg daily is safe or effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture (95695). For information on patients WITH osteoporosis, refer to the Osteoporosis discussion. There is limited research available regarding the effects of vitamin D supplementation for fracture prevention in children. Preliminary research in children aged 2 to 17 years with vitamin D insufficiency and one or more previous fractures shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily with calcium 600 mg daily for 6 months modestly reduces the risk of forearm fractures over 12 months compared with children not given vitamin D or calcium (110820).
• Hypertension. Overall, vitamin D does not seem to prevent or lower high blood pressure in most patients; however, it may lower blood pressure in hypertensive patients with vitamin D deficiency. Details: Although population research has found that lower vitamin D levels are associated with a higher risk of developing hypertension, clinical research shows vitamin D supplementation does not prevent hypertension (15630) A large clinical trial in postmenopausal adults shows that taking vitamin D3 400 IU with calcium 1000 mg daily does not reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Most meta-analyses and clinical trials in patients with existing hypertension show that vitamin D supplementation does not lower blood pressure when compared with placebo, regardless of vitamin D formulation, dose, or duration of supplementation (16714,91340,96405,103657,104619). However, a meta-analysis of five clinical studies in patients with hypertension and vitamin D deficiency shows that supplementation with vitamin D reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by about 7 mmHg and 3 mmHg, respectively, when compared with placebo (100895). Similarly, an individual clinical study in patients with hypertension and vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly or 1000 IU daily reduces systolic blood pressure by about 6 mmHg and mean arterial pressure by about 4 mmHg, but does not affect diastolic blood pressure, when compared with baseline (108440). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Prostate cancer. Oral vitamin D does not appear to affect prostate cancer progression or cancer-related mortality. Details: A meta-analysis of three clinical trials shows that vitamin D supplementation does not affect prostate cancer progression as measured by prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or mortality in patients with prostate cancer (99770).
• Psychosis. Oral vitamin D does not seem to improve symptoms in patients with a functional psychotic disorder. Details: A clinical study in adults with a functional psychotic disorder shows that taking oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 20,000 IU monthly for 6 months has no effect on total positive and negative syndrome scale score (PANSS) when compared with placebo. The majority of patients included in this study were deficient in vitamin D at baseline (107226).
• Tuberculosis. Oral vitamin D seems to be ineffective for reducing the severity of tuberculosis or mortality from tuberculosis. Limited research suggests that vitamin D may have small benefits in newly diagnosed patients receiving tuberculosis treatment for the first time. Details: Although population research has found that tuberculosis is associated with vitamin D deficiency, most clinical research shows that taking vitamin D does not improve clinical outcomes in people with tuberculosis infection. Meta-analyses and individual clinical studies show that taking vitamin D as a single 100,000 IU dose, or as 400 IU daily for 2 months, along with standard care does not improve tuberculosis severity or reduce the risk of mortality in children or adults with tuberculosis, regardless of their baseline vitamin D levels (82570,82475,98913,103655,103668,104022). However, some research has identified modest benefits in newly diagnosed patients receiving anti-tuberculosis treatment for the first time. A meta-analysis of clinical research in this population shows that taking vitamin D at a dose of 1000 IU daily or 600,000 IU monthly modestly increases the odds of sputum smear conversions by 1.2-fold, but does not improve the time to sputum smear conversions, when compared with placebo (98235). A small clinical study in treatment-naïve adults with low levels of serum vitamin D shows that taking calcitriol 0.25 mcg twice daily for up to 6 months, starting with anti-tuberculosis treatment initiation, decreases the time to sputum smear conversion and 50% lesion absorption by about 3 days when compared with not taking vitamin D (109045). Additionally, a small clinical study in children aged 6-18 years with vitamin D insufficiency receiving standard treatment for newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis shows that taking vitamin D 1000 IU daily reduces the duration of fever and cough by 1 and 2 weeks, respectively, when compared with placebo (108437).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for acne. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with acne and vitamin D deficiency shows that taking cholecalciferol 1,000 IU daily for 2 months reduces the number of inflammatory lesions by about 35%, compared with 6% in those taking placebo. There was no effect on the total or non-inflammatory lesion count (106127). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking alfacalcidol (One Alpha, LEO Company, Denmark) 0.25 mcg daily for 3 months modestly improves acne severity when compared with taking placebo (106128). In addition, population research has found that individuals with acne have modestly lower vitamin D levels than healthy controls. The odds of vitamin D deficiency were approximately three times higher in patients with acne when compared with healthy controls (106105).
• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral cholecalciferol is beneficial for preventing age-related cognitive decline. Details: Pooled results of two large clinical sub-studies in community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older show that taking cholecalciferol 2000 IU daily for 2-3 years has no effect on cognitive decline when compared with placebo. A subgroup analysis in Black patients suggests a modest effect of vitamin D when compared with placebo (108428).
• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for this condition. Details: Some population research has found that lower serum concentrations of vitamin D are associated with higher risk of Alzheimer disease, and also with decreased cognition. People with Alzheimer disease seem to have serum concentrations of vitamin D that are about 2.5 ng/mL lower than patients without Alzheimer disease (84672,103666). However, other population research has found that vitamin D deficiency (<25 nmol/L) or insufficiency (25-50 nmol/L) is not associated with increased risk of Alzheimer disease (100899).
• Asthma. Oral vitamin D might reduce asthma exacerbations in adults and children with mild, but not severe or persistent, asthma. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy or the first 6 months of an infant's life does not seem to prevent the development of asthma later in infancy or childhood. Details: Population research in patients with asthma suggests that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk of exacerbations and increased need for medication therapy (94693). However, findings from clinical research are mixed. Some meta-analyses of clinical trials in adults and children with asthma show that taking vitamin D for 3 months to 1 year reduces the rate of asthma exacerbations by 31% to 36% when compared with control (92690,94686). However, findings from more recent meta-analyses show that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of asthma exacerbations when compared with placebo (109728,109732,110833). The reasons for this discrepancy are not clear. However, some clinical research suggests that vitamin D supplements might only prevent asthma in people with non-persistent asthma (92690,94685,94686,94688,104020). Also, many studies are small and do not represent patients with severe asthma exacerbations (92690,94687). Baseline levels of vitamin D may play a role. A clinical study in children aged 6-16 years with persistent asthma and low vitamin D levels shows that taking vitamin D 4000 IU daily for 48 weeks does not reduce severe asthma exacerbations when compared with placebo (104020). However, a meta-analysis including this study shows that taking vitamin D does reduce risk of asthma exacerbations in children with low baseline vitamin D levels (109728). One meta-analysis shows that taking vitamin D seems to modestly improve pulmonary function when compared with placebo (109732). Vitamin D doses have varied, with oral doses of 500-4000 IU daily, 1000 IU once weekly, 60,000 IU once monthly, 120,000 IU every 2 months, 100,000 IU 14 days apart, or 100,000 to 600,000 IU as a bolus dose followed by 400-4000 IU daily (92690,94686,104020,109728,110833). Vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of asthma in infants has also been evaluated. A meta-analysis of 4 large clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D 400-1200 IU daily for the first 6 months of life does not reduce the risk of asthma or wheezing at 6-30 months of age when compared with control (112031). Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy has also been evaluated (97306,99763,102146,112031). A meta-analysis of 3 large clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D 2800-4400 IU daily during the 2^nd and 3^rd trimesters of pregnancy reduces the risk of recurrent wheezing by 23% but does not reduce the risk of asthma diagnosis within the first 3-6 years of life when compared with vitamin D 400 IU daily (112031). Some research suggests that the dose of vitamin D plays a role. A meta-analysis shows that prenatal vitamin D 800 IU daily reduces the odds of wheeze or asthma by 32%, while lower or higher vitamin D doses were not beneficial (103661).
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for athletic performance. Details: One small clinical trial in athletes shows that taking vitamin D 20,000 or 40,000 IU once weekly for 2 doses does not affect performance on vertical jumps, sprints, or leg and bench presses when compared with placebo (98188). Another small clinical trial in professional rugby players shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 50,000 IU once every two weeks over 12 weeks does not improve sprinting speed or the ability to perform bench presses, bench pulls, and chin-ups when compared with placebo (98189). Also, most research shows that taking vitamin D does not improve measures of cardiorespiratory fitness. One small study in young males undergoing resistance training shows that taking vitamin D 8000 IU daily for 12 weeks does not improve cardiorespiratory fitness compared with taking placebo (110812).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Most research shows that oral vitamin D reduces eczema severity in children. However, most research shows that oral vitamin D, taken during pregnancy or infancy, does not prevent eczema in the child. Details: A meta-analysis of eight moderate-quality clinical trials in children shows that taking vitamin D, most commonly 1000-2000 IU daily for 4-12 weeks, modestly reduces severity of eczema when compared with placebo (109728). Most of the children in these studies were also given conventional medications. Oral vitamin D has also been evaluated for eczema prevention. A meta-analysis of two clinical studies shows that consuming vitamin D 2800-4400 IU daily during the 2^nd and 3^rd trimesters of pregnancy is not associated with a reduced risk for eczema in children during the first 3 years of life when compared with vitamin D 400 IU daily (97306). Another meta-analysis of five large clinical studies shows that prenatal or infant vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of developing eczema when compared with low-dose vitamin D, placebo, or no intervention (108438).
• Atrial fibrillation. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing atrial fibrillation. Details: A large clinical trial in adults without cardiovascular disease shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for an average of 5 years does not reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation when compared with placebo or fish oil 840 mg daily (105209). However, observational research in postmenopausal adults with osteoporosis found that vitamin D supplementation is associated with a lower occurrence of atrial fibrillation when compared with not taking vitamin D (98922). Also, one large observational study in vitamin D-deficient patients with no history of atrial fibrillation has found that vitamin D supplementation for at least 6 months is associated with up to a 16% decreased risk of atrial fibrillation when compared with not taking vitamin D. There were also modest improvements in atrial fibrillation-free survival. In males 65 years and older with hypertension or diabetes at baseline, blood levels of at least 30 ng/mL following vitamin D supplementation were associated with decreased risk of atrial fibrillation; a post-supplementation blood level of 21-29 ng/mL was not associated with decreased risk (109043).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for ADHD. Details: A small clinical trial in children 5-12 years of age with ADHD and vitamin D insufficiency shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily along with methylphenidate for 8 weeks seems to improve parental ratings of evening, but not morning or overall, symptoms of inattentiveness and impulsivity when compared with methylphenidate alone. Vitamin D insufficiency was defined as levels less than 30 ng/mL (98196). Based on these and other preliminary findings, Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that vitamin D in doses of 1500 to 4000 IU daily is weakly recommended for adjunctive use in children with ADHD, especially those with insufficient intake or skin exposure to sunlight (110318).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for autism spectrum disorder. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 2.5-8 years with autism spectrum disorder shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 12 months modestly reduces irritability and hyperactivity when compared with placebo (99767).
• Bacterial vaginosis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for bacterial vaginosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in females at high risk for sexually transmitted disease shows that taking vitamin D along with standard therapy for bacterial vaginosis does not reduce the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis when compared with placebo. Patients in this study had been treated with metronidazole 500 mg orally twice daily for 7 days along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 50,000 IU each week for 4 weeks and then every 4 weeks for the remaining 20 weeks (91348).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention of breast cancer. Details: Some population research evaluating intake of calcium plus vitamin D suggests that higher vitamin D intake is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer in premenopausal or postmenopausal adults (15631). Similarly, a large observational study in females with a biological sibling with breast cancer has found that taking vitamin D recently or prior to enrollment is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer when compared with nonrecent vitamin D use or never taking vitamin D, respectively (107215). However, other research found that higher vitamin D intake is associated with a 17% reduced risk of breast cancer in premenopausal and perimenopausal, but not postmenopausal, adults (39001). Observational research has also examined the association between blood levels of vitamin D and risk of developing breast cancer. A meta-analysis found that those with serum levels of about 52 ng/mL had a 50% lower risk of developing breast cancer when compared with those with serum levels of less than 13 ng/mL. This high serum level of vitamin D corresponds to a high dose of about 4000 IU daily (16049). Other observational research has found that baseline vitamin D levels of more than 20 ng/mL are associated with a 48% reduced risk of developing breast cancer over approximately 9 years in Latina females in the US when compared with levels below 20 ng/mL; however, this association was not present in Black females (109058). Despite the contradictory findings from observational research, results from clinical research are generally negative. Evidence from one large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative) shows that postmenopausal adults who take vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years do not have a significantly reduced risk of developing breast cancer (16715,98895). Also, a meta-analysis of two large-scale clinical trials, which did not include the Women's Health Initiative trial, shows that taking vitamin D 800-1000 IU daily, alone or with calcium, for 3-4 years does not reduce the incidence of breast cancer in postmenopausal adults, although there was a trend towards reduced risk with higher doses of vitamin D supplementation (97301). While vitamin D and calcium supplementation during the intervention period of the Women's Health Initiative trial was not associated with a reduced risk of developing breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a precursor to breast cancer, a secondary post-hoc analysis of the data shows that supplementation reduces the risk of developing DCIS by 18% over a median follow-up of 19 years (107216). Additional research is needed regarding an optimal dose of vitamin D, timing of initiation, and whether any benefit is affected by menopausal status.
• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Limited research suggests that vitamin D deficiency is linked with bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the infant. Details: Observational research has found that vitamin D deficiency at birth is associated with about a 2-fold increased odds of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (104021). However, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial.
• Cancer. Vitamin D does not seem to reduce overall cancer risk. However, some research shows that vitamin D might slightly reduce the risk of metastatic cancer and cancer-related mortality. Details: There is interest in vitamin D for cancer PREVENTION, as observational research suggests that higher vitamin D intake and higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with a lower risk of cancer (111150). While individual clinical trials evaluating vitamin D for cancer have produced inconsistent findings, most meta-analyses and clinical trials show that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) alone or with calcium does not significantly reduce the risk of developing cancer (15629,91344,93943,97296,98916,104024,104618,110811). However, vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of metastatic cancer and cancer-related mortality. A large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D3 2000 IU daily for a median of 5.3 years slightly reduces the risk of advanced metastatic or fatal cancers when compared with placebo (104618). Additionally, meta-analyses of several large clinical trials show that taking vitamin D 400-4000 IU daily, with or without calcium, for 1-7 years reduces the risk of cancer-related mortality by 12-13% when compared with control, while intermittent bolus dosing of vitamin D at high doses for 1-5 years does not appear to reduce the risk of cancer-related mortality (104024,111149). The role of vitamin D in cancer TREATMENT is unclear. A meta-analysis of clinical and observational research suggests that supplementation of vitamin D after a cancer diagnosis is associated with a modest improvement in overall survival, but not progression-free or cancer-specific survival (109726). Doses used in clinical research ranged between 1200 IU and 8000 IU daily or 100,000 IU every 50 days, after surgery and/or during treatment (99195,99196,109726). Other clinical research in patients with luminal gastrointestinal cancers shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily does not reduce the risk of relapse when compared with placebo (99195). It is unclear which, if any, types or stages of cancer respond best to vitamin D, and what dose of vitamin D is optimal.
• Child growth. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for improving infant growth or bone structure. Details: Meta-analyses and individual clinical trials show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy modestly increases length at birth and bone mineral density at up to 6 years of age when compared with control, usually placebo or vitamin D 400 IU daily. However, there was no effect on length in the infant up to one year of age, weight at birth or up to one year of age, head circumference at birth or up to 6 years of age, bone mineral content at up to 6 years of age, or neonatal bone mineral density, bone mineral content, bone area, or femur or humoral length (98198,109737,112028). In the available research, vitamin D was taken in doses of 200 IU to 4400 IU daily, 4200 IU to 50,000 IU weekly, 50,000 IU every 2 weeks, or 60,000 IU every 4-8 weeks, starting from the early to late stages of pregnancy and usually continued until birth (98198,109737).
• Chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with CKD. Most research suggests that it does not reduce the risk for adverse cardiovascular events. Details: Population research in patients on dialysis has found that vitamin D levels less than 17.8 ng/mL are associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with higher levels (16619). A meta-analysis and individual clinical studies show that vitamin D and vitamin D analogues decrease parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels and urine protein levels in people with CKD (84376,84377,84628,98233,98236). However, taking vitamin D does not appear to decrease the risk of death or parathyroidectomy in CKD patients (84376,84377). Also, taking vitamin D increases the risk for hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia in this patient population (84376,84377,98236). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the prevention of cardiovascular events in adults with CKD. Observational research has found that vitamin D deficiency in patients with CKD is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. However, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to be beneficial. One clinical study shows that taking paricalcitol, an active form of vitamin D, titrated to maintain adequate serum calcium levels, for 48 weeks does not affect the size of the left ventricle or heart function when compared with placebo (98233). Other clinical research in Japanese patients on hemodialysis for CKD shows that adding alfacalcidol, another active form of vitamin D, 0.5 mcg daily to standard treatment for 4 years does not affect mortality or cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarctions, stroke, aortic dissection, and others compared to standard treatment only (98920). Also, a large clinical trial in patients with CKD shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol 2000 IU daily, alone or with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, does not affect major cardiovascular events or invasive cancer when compared with placebo (110811). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for musculoskeletal health in adults with CKD. A small clinical study shows that taking cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily, with or without physical activity, for 3 months improves bicep strength, but not back flexibility or aerobic fitness capacity, when compared with baseline. In patients taking cholecalciferol in combination with physical activity, musculoskeletal health was similar when compared with cholecalciferol alone (108431). However, this study was inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups, and it is unclear if the improvement from baseline differed between groups. Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the improvement of iron status in adults with CKD and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Clinical research shows that taking Vitamin D as cholecalciferol (Vitamin D3 Forte Renapharma) 8000 IU daily for 12 weeks does not improve iron status compared with taking placebo. However, a sub-analysis shows that hemoglobin levels are modestly improved in patients with a low Vitamin D status at baseline suggesting that Vitamin D might improve iron availability in these patients (110819).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for COPD; benefits may be limited to patients with vitamin D deficiency. Details: Population research has found an association between low vitamin D levels and reduced lung function, increased risk of developing COPD, and worsening COPD severity (17685,96401). In contrast, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that oral vitamin D does not have beneficial effects on mortality, rate of COPD exacerbations, pulmonary function, or most measures of symptom severity when compared with placebo (109732). However, vitamin D may be beneficial in patients with vitamin D deficiency. Some clinical research in patients with moderate to severe COPD and severe vitamin D deficiency shows that taking a specific vitamin D supplement (D-Cure, Laboratoires SMB) 100,000 IU once every 4 weeks for 1 year seems to reduce the rate of exacerbations by 43% when compared with placebo (98194).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for cognitive function. Details: Population research has found that low vitamin D levels are associated with worse cognitive performance and cognitive decline when compared to high vitamin D levels in healthy adults (84672,95916). However, the effect of vitamin D supplementation on cognitive function is unclear. One small meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation does not improve cognitive function (95916). However, the included trials evaluated a widely heterogeneous study population and utilized variable measures of cognitive function.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of colorectal cancer. Details: Epidemiological research has found that a higher serum vitamin D level is associated with decreased risk of mortality and increased survival in patients with colorectal cancer (16101,99196). However, it is unclear whether vitamin D supplementation improves survival in patients with colorectal cancer, as research has generally involved small populations and results are somewhat conflicting. A subgroup analysis of one clinical study shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily does not reduce the risk of relapse or death, death due to any cause, or relapse over 5 years when compared with placebo in patients with colorectal cancer (99195). However, this subgroup may have been underpowered to detect between-group differences. Another small clinical trial in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer shows that taking high-dose vitamin D 8000 IU daily during the first cycle of chemotherapy, and then 4000 IU daily for subsequent cycles, does not increase median progression-free survival when compared with taking vitamin D 400 IU daily. However, patients taking high-dose vitamin D were 36% less likely to experience disease progression or death during follow-up when compared with patients taking the lower dose of vitamin D (99196). This latter result suggests that high-dose vitamin D supplementation might be beneficial for patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, but larger, multicenter studies are needed to confirm. The role of vitamin D in colorectal cancer prevention has also been investigated. A meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that a higher serum vitamin D level is associated with a decreased colorectal cancer risk; however, sub-analyses suggest that this association only occurs in females, not males (109740). Most studies have evaluated vitamin D supplements in combination with calcium; the effects of vitamin D supplementation alone are unclear. One meta-analysis of clinical research suggests that taking vitamin D plus calcium is not associated with a decreased incidence of colorectal cancer in people with a low baseline risk of colorectal cancer (39042). Another meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation, with or without calcium, does not reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer or colorectal adenomas (109730). Additionally, a large clinical trial suggests that postmenopausal adults who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290,98895). One clinical study shows that taking calcium supplements reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas, but not in people with lower than average vitamin D levels (12118).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The evidence is mixed with respect to oral vitamin D supplementation for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Also, although some observational research has suggested a correlation between vitamin D status and risk for COVID-19, not all studies agree, and this association may be due to other confounders such as age and comorbidities. Details: Clinical and observational research has evaluated vitamin D supplementation for COVID-19 prevention. A preliminary clinical trial shows that oral vitamin D 800 IU or 3200 IU daily for 6 months in individuals with lower serum levels of vitamin D does not reduce the risk of COVID-19 or any respiratory tract infection when compared with no vitamin D supplementation (109721). However, groups were not matched for baseline vitamin D status and many individuals in the untreated group took their own vitamin D supplements. A meta-analysis of mainly observational research shows no relationship between vitamin D supplementation and the primary prevention of COVID-19 infection, although baseline vitamin D status is unclear (109040). Also, a quasi-experimental cohort study in Italian adults who had supplemented with vitamin D in the 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis found no reduction in risk for hospitalization, as well as a trend towards increased risk for in-hospital mortality, when compared with those who had not received vitamin D supplementation (104625). However, some research disagrees. Clinical research in highly exposed healthcare workers shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily for 30 days reduces the risk of COVID-19 infection by 77% when compared with placebo (109052). Also, in the UK population, observational research has found that habitual use of vitamin D supplements between 2006 and 2010 is associated with a 34% lower risk of COVID-19 infection. This finding remained positive after adjusting for baseline health status and use of other micronutrients (104717). Vitamin D supplementation as treatment in outpatients with COVID-19 has also been evaluated. Preliminary clinical research discussed in a systematic review suggests that supplementation might be associated with less severe symptoms; however, there is inadequate information to determine if supplementation in patients with mild symptoms is associated with reduced hospital admission (109040). Conversely, a large cross-sectional study found an association between pre-hospital supplementation and increased risk for COVID-19, as well as increased rates of death and/or invasive mechanical ventilation. However, this association was no longer significant after adjusting for sex, age, and comorbidities (107205). Most research on vitamin D supplementation has been conducted in hospitalized patients. A meta-analysis of clinical and observational research in these patients suggests that vitamin D supplementation is associated with a 65% reduced risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and a 54% reduced risk of mortality (109040). However, another meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation as single or multiple doses is not associated with a decreased risk of mortality, length of hospitalization, admission to ICU, or need for ventilation when compared with placebo or standard care alone (109733). The quality of evidence of most individual clinical trials are low to moderate due to a lack of placebo and blinding in most of the studies. Most studies evaluating single doses of vitamin D, administered either after diagnosis or after hospital admission, have not identified benefit for major outcomes, such as hospital length of stay, in-hospital mortality, or admission to ICU. Many of these studies were small and conducted in heterogenous populations, with doses ranging from 80,000 IU to 500,000 IU (104624,104626,107208,108434,109051). One small, unblinded study in at-risk older adults admitted to the hospital or living in a long-term care facility shows that taking a single dose of 400,000 IU within 72 hours of diagnosis modestly improves survival at 14 days, but not 28 days, when compared with 50,000 IU (109039). The evidence related to multi-dose regimens in hospitalized patients is mixed. A cohort study shows that giving calcifediol 0.532 mg at hospital admission, followed by calcifediol 0.266 mg on days 3 and 7 and then weekly until discharge or ICU admission, reduces odds of in-hospital death within 30 days by 78% when compared with those not given vitamin D (106099). A small clinical trial in patients with vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D 25,000 IU daily for 4 days and then weekly for up to 6 weeks reduces length of hospital stay and duration of supplemental oxygen by 4 days and 3 days, respectively, and also reduces disease severity and ICU admission after 7 days (109050). A small, unblinded study in patients with suboptimal vitamin D status and mild to moderate COVID-19 shows that taking vitamin D3 5,000 IU daily for 2 weeks reduces the time to recovery from cough and loss of taste by 2.9 and 5.5 days, respectively, when compared with vitamin D3 1,000 IU daily. However, there was no difference in time to recovery from fever, dyspnea, body aches, or other symptoms (106117). However, some research disagrees. A small unblinded study has found that although vitamin D status at 9 days is negatively associated with the number of bed days, vitamin D 50,000 IU on days 1 and 8 does not affect the number of bed days, time to discharge, or ICU admission when compared with no supplementation (109047). An additional preliminary study in patients with severe COVID-19 and low blood levels of vitamin D shows that taking vitamin D (Plivit D3, Pliva) 10,000 IU daily while in the ICU or for at least 14 days does not reduce the number of days on respiratory support, or in the ICU or hospital, or improve survival rates when compared with no supplementation (110813). The relationship between vitamin D levels and COVID-19 has also been evaluated in pregnant patients. A meta-analysis of observational research suggests that, while lower vitamin D levels are not associated with an increased risk of COVID-19, the presence of severe COVID-19 symptoms in pregnant patients may be linked to lower vitamin D levels when compared with non-severe COVID-19 symptoms (112025). Limited research has investigated the effect of vitamin D in combination with other ingredients. Preliminary clinical research in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 shows that taking vitamin D3 (Davalindi, Medical Union Pharma, Cairo, Egypt) 2000 IU daily in combination with black seed (Baraka, Pharco Pharmaceuticals, Cairo, Egypt) 900 mg twice daily for 14 days modestly reduced the severity of some symptoms, including cough, diarrhea, fatigue, and pharyngitis, as well as the percent patients with viral positivity at day 7, but not headache, rhinorrhea, anosmia, or shortness of breath, or vomiting, when compared to standard care alone. However, taking vitamin D alone did not provide significant benefit (110265). The validity of individual studies is limited by generally poor designs. More research is needed to evaluate varying vitamin D dosing levels and schedules, as well as evaluated outcomes, and whether patients with vitamin D insufficiency are more likely to benefit from vitamin D supplementation. The relationship between vitamin D status and risk of COVID-19 infection or severe disease is unclear. Despite some observational research suggesting that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk for COVID-19 mortality, development of severe disease, such as pulmonary involvement, and extended hospitalization or admission to intensive care (107206,107207,108434), several meta-analyses of observational research as well as individual observational studies have found that vitamin D deficiency in adults is not associated with a higher risk for COVID-19 infection or with disease severity or mortality (104627,107208,107209). Additional observational research has found no association between vitamin D status and hospital length of stay, need for mechanical ventilation, mortality, or experiencing persistent feelings of fatigue or reduced exercise tolerance, otherwise known as "long-COVID" (106102,106116,106120,107206). However, one meta-analysis has found that when compared with mild disease, 65% more individuals with severe disease had vitamin D deficiency. Also, vitamin D insufficiency, defined as blood levels less than 30 ng/mL, is associated with a more than 80% increased chance of hospitalization or mortality due to COVID-19. Notably, many of these studies did not control for patient age or other comorbidities (104627). A more recent observational study has found that vitamin D status in patients with severe COVID-19 symptoms is inversely correlated with both ICU admission and death, with a 1% reduction in risk of ICU admission and 4% reduction in risk of death for every 1 ng/mL increase in 25-hydroxyvitamin D (106112). In one individual observational study, the association between vitamin D status and COVID-19 infection is no longer significant after adjusting for socioeconomic status, age, health status, body mass index, ethnicity, and other covariates (104628). In contrast, a small observational study of adults admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 has found that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk of mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality, even after adjustment for ethnicity and pre-existing conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, and diabetes. However, this study is small and does not adjust for socioeconomic factors (105720). Also, another individual observational study has found that the likelihood of testing positive for COVID-19 is increased in Black, but not White, adults who had a vitamin D level of 30-40 ng/mL at some point in the past year when compared with a level of at least 40 ng/mL, with risk decreasing as levels increased from 30 ng/mL to 40 ng/mL (104716). Patients should be encouraged to maintain adequate vitamin D levels. A joint task force has recommended 400-1000 IU (10-25 mcg) daily for those who are unable to spend 15-30 minutes in the sun each day (103659,104629).
• Crohn disease. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D reduces relapses in patients with Crohn disease. Details: A meta-analysis of small, low-quality clinical studies in patients with IBD, including Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, shows that taking high- or low-dose vitamin D for up to 1 year reduces the rate of relapse when compared with control (98915). The validity of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies.
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for dementia. Details: Population research has found that patients with any type of dementia have serum concentrations of vitamin D that are about 2.5 ng/mL lower than patients without dementia (84672). However, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for treating depression. Vitamin D does not seem to prevent the development of depression. Details: The role of vitamin D in the treatment of depression is unclear. Earlier meta-analyses of clinical research show that vitamin D supplementation does not improve overall symptoms of depression. However, some subgroup analyses suggest that vitamin D may be beneficial for improving the symptoms of depression in people with clinically significant symptoms, as well as those with baseline vitamin D deficiency (97295,97298). A more recent meta-analysis of 18 clinical trials shows that vitamin D modestly improves symptoms of depression in adults, but not elderly adults. There was no evidence that the type of depression or baseline vitamin D status affected these findings (110832). This analysis is limited by the inclusion of one study using intramuscular vitamin D which may have affected the conclusions. Also, although an individual clinical trial disagrees (108423), a meta-analysis of generally small clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes and depression shows that taking vitamin D modestly improves depressive symptoms when compared with placebo or no intervention (110814). The evaluated research implemented one-time doses of 150,000-300,000 IU, as well as daily and weekly doses ranging between 400-5000 IU daily or 5000-100,000 IU weekly for 6 weeks to 2 years, with the most evidence of benefit related to one-time high doses. Cholecalciferol was the most common form of vitamin D used (97295,97298,108423,110814,110832). Significant heterogeneity between studies and the wide variability In dosing strategies limit the validity of these findings, as well as identification of an effective dose or target population. Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the prevention of depression. One large clinical study (VITAL-DEP) in healthy patients 50 years and older shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for about 5.3 years does not prevent depression or depressive symptoms, or improve mood, when compared with placebo (103670). An analysis of a cohort of patients from the VITAL-DEP trial also shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 2 years does not reduce the risk of major depressive disorder or improve mood scores in patients with subthreshold depression or risk factors for late-life depression when compared with placebo (112032). Based on these and other preliminary findings, Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that vitamin D in doses of 1500 to 4000 IU daily is weakly recommended for adjunctive or monotherapy use in patients with depression, especially those with insufficient intake or skin exposure to sunlight (110318).
• Diabetes. Oral vitamin D might improve glycemic indices in some patients with type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention of type 1 or gestational diabetes. It is also unclear if intramuscular vitamin D is beneficial for the treatment of gestational diabetes. Details: Most meta-analyses of mainly small clinical trials show that vitamin D supplementation is beneficial for measures of glycemic control in patients with diabetes. However, the best evidence of benefit is in patients with baseline vitamin D deficiency. One meta-analysis of small trials in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that vitamin D supplementation reduces glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.25%. In patients with baseline vitamin D deficiency, supplementation also improves fasting blood glucose levels when compared with control (96403). Another meta-analysis of small trials in patients with vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency and type 2 diabetes shows that oral vitamin D modestly improves fasting blood glucose and postprandial blood glucose, but not HbA1c, when compared with control (107210). A more recent meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation reduces HbA1c by 0.20%, and modestly improves fasting blood glucose and measures of insulin resistance when compared to control. However, subgroup analyses show that efficacy is limited to patients with vitamin D deficiency at baseline (110822). Most of the evaluated research implemented daily or weekly doses of vitamin D for 4-48 weeks (96403,107210,110822). However, one meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with diabetes shows that vitamin D improves HbA1c, insulin resistance, and insulin measures in studies lasting less than 6 months, but not in studies lasting longer than 6 months (99764). An additional meta-analysis suggests that most evidence of benefit is associated with doses of more than 2000 IU daily for 4-12 weeks (110822). One small, long-term clinical study in middle-aged and elderly patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily for 30 months reduces insulin levels and insulin resistance when compared with no supplementation. However, there was no effect on HbA1c or fasting blood glucose levels (109734). Thus, conflicting results may be related to the dose and duration of vitamin D supplementation, as well as patient characteristics at time of study entry, such as vitamin D status, baseline HbA1c levels, obesity, and medication regimen (97304,99764,109734,110822). Vitamin D has been evaluated for the prevention of type 1 diabetes. There is preliminary evidence that daily vitamin D supplementation (form not specified) in infants during the first year of life is associated with a reduced incidence of type 1 diabetes development later in life (10139). Also, a meta-analysis of population studies has found that vitamin D supplementation in early childhood is associated with a 29% reduced risk of developing type 1 diabetes later in life (84225). Vitamin D has been evaluated in patients with gestational diabetes. Some research has evaluated the effects of oral or intramuscular vitamin D on glycemic indices. The evidence from clinical research comparing vitamin D with placebo is mixed. Most studies show modest evidence of benefit for some markers of glycemic control. One clinical trial shows that vitamin D modestly reduces levels of insulin, as well as measures of insulin resistance, with no effect on fasting blood glucose (106125). However, other clinical research shows that taking vitamin D modestly reduces levels of fasting blood glucose and HbA1c, with no effect on insulin measures (106126). Two other trials show that taking vitamin D modestly improves all measures of glycemic indices (101775,106122). Additionally, a large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D 1600 IU daily modestly reduces fasting blood glucose when compared with vitamin D 400 IU daily (112020). Some clinical research has also evaluated the effects of oral vitamin D on lipid indices in patients with gestational diabetes. Although some individual clinical research disagrees (106126), most research shows that taking vitamin D modestly improves levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides when compared with control (106125,110823). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with gestational diabetes shows that taking vitamin D reduces the risk of premature birth and neonatal hospitalization by approximately 63% and 62%, respectively (110823). Oral vitamin D 50,000 IU (eg. D-Vitin50000; Zahravi Pharm Co.) once or twice monthly, starting at week 24 of gestation and continuing for 6 weeks, 8 weeks, or until delivery, has been used in most of these studies (106122,106125,106126). One study provided oral vitamin D 500 IU twice daily in yogurt from the beginning of the second trimester for 16 weeks (101775). However, other preliminary clinical research shows that giving vitamin D 300,000 IU as a single intramuscular injection at 24-28 weeks' gestation does not affect HbA1c (106124). Some research has examined the effect of vitamin D supplementation on insulin resistance during pregnancy in the absence of gestational diabetes. A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin D for 6 to 26 weeks modestly decreases measures of insulin resistance when compared with placebo. However, there was no evidence to suggest that higher doses were more beneficial than lower doses. Although this population did not have gestational diabetes, these results suggest that adequate vitamin D might be beneficial for its prevention (110821). Vitamin D has also been evaluated in combination with omega-3 fatty acids in adults with gestational diabetes. One study evaluated vitamin D in combination with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 360 mg plus docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 240 mg twice daily. There is some evidence that this combination offers benefit over vitamin D alone and plasma triglyceride levels were also improved (106122). Other clinical research in patients with gestational diabetes shows that taking vitamin D with omega-3 fatty acids 8,000 mg twice daily for 6 weeks modestly improves glycemic indices and most lipid markers when compared with placebo (106114). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the prevention of gestational diabetes. A meta-analysis of four clinical trials shows that vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of gestational diabetes by 49% when compared with placebo (100897). In addition, a meta-analysis of population studies has found that there is a U-shaped association between serum vitamin D concentrations and the risk of developing gestational diabetes, with serum concentrations between 40 and 90 nmol/L associated with the lowest risk (106109).
• Diabetic foot ulcers. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for diabetic foot ulcers. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with diabetic foot ulcers shows that taking vitamin D modestly reduces ulcer size and improves glycemic and lipid indices when compared with placebo (110835). This meta-analysis is limited by the availability of three small clinical trials, as well as the heterogeneous doses of vitamin D in the included studies.
• Diabetic nephropathy. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D improves some markers of kidney function in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in patients with diabetic nephropathy shows that taking vitamin D or its analogs reduces inflammatory markers and protein in the urine, but does not affect measures of kidney function such as serum creatinine or glomerular filtration rate, when compared to control (99771).
• Dysmenorrhea. Limited evidence suggests that oral vitamin D reduces pain in patients with dysmenorrhea. Details: A meta-analysis of 9 small clinical studies in patients with dysmenorrhea shows that taking vitamin D in doses ranging from 5000 IU daily to 300,000 IU monthly modestly reduces pain when compared with control (112029). However, the validity of these findings is limited by a high degree of heterogeneity across the studies, including differences in blinding and control interventions, vitamin D doses and frequency of supplementation, and baseline vitamin D levels. Another small clinical study in adolescent patients with dysmenorrhea shows that taking vitamin D3 50,000 IU weekly for 9 weeks modestly reduces pain when compared to baseline (98912). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. Small studies suggest that vitamin D does not improve exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 small studies shows that taking vitamin D before and/or during exercise does not improve circulating levels of creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, or myoglobin when compared with placebo (107218).
• Fall prevention. The role of vitamin D in fall prevention is confusing and controversial. Oral vitamin D should be considered for those with vitamin D deficiency. Details: Higher serum levels of vitamin D have been associated with improved lower-extremity function in elderly adults (15636). Clinical research shows that taking vitamin D or vitamin D analogues, with or without calcium, reduces the number of people who have a fall by up to 19% (39038,84215,84374,84539,94130,104023). Other research shows that vitamin D, with or without calcium, reduces number of falls by 19% to 50% (11939,16275,84404,93941,109053). In these studies that show beneficial effects, the form of vitamin D (ergocalciferol, cholecalciferol) does not appear to influence results (39038,84374). Some clinical research shows a decreased rate of falls in patients with low baseline levels of vitamin D, but not in those with adequate vitamin D levels (84670,84684,109053). One meta-analysis also suggests that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol up to 1000 IU daily reduces fall risk by up to 19%, whereas studies using higher doses did not reduce the risk of falling (109053). Also, daily dosing, but not intermittent dosing, seems to be associated with a reduced risk of falling (109053). Despite a substantial amount of positive research, more recent clinical studies show that vitamin D does not reduce the risk of falling (84404,84670), the rate of falls overall (84670,93942), or the rate of injurious falls (93942) in elderly patients (93942). One study in adults over 70 years of age with a history of falling actually found that taking high-dose vitamin D, either as 60,000 IU monthly or 24,000 IU plus calcifediol 300 mcg monthly, increased both the risk of falling and the mean number of falls compared to a lower dose of 24,000 IU monthly (93940). One meta-analysis of 20 trials including nearly 30,000 patients shows that taking vitamin D, with or without calcium, does not reduce the risk of falling in elderly patients, regardless of baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D achieved with treatment, duration of treatment, or residential status of the patients (91342). While a meta-analysis of 10 trials in nearly 6,000 patients shows that taking vitamin D 700-1000 IU daily with calcium 1000-2000 mg daily reduces the risk of falling in the elderly by 12% when compared with placebo or no treatment, a meta-analysis of 21 trials in nearly 52,000 patients shows that vitamin D alone is only associated with a reduced risk of falls in patients with baseline vitamin D levels of less than 50 nmol/L when compared with placebo or no treatment (107224). The 2018 US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for fall prevention acknowledges this research by recommending AGAINST vitamin D supplementation for fall prevention in community dwelling adults 65 years of age and older who do not have osteoporosis or vitamin D deficiency (95703). The reasons for the disparate study results may have to do with the way in which clinical trials have reported outcomes. Clinical trials assessing the effect of vitamin D on fall risk may report results as the number of patients who experience one or more falls, the total number of falls, or the rate of falls per individual. This can affect ultimate conclusions and, in some cases, can be misleading. For example, when studies report on only the total number of falls, it is unclear if vitamin D reduces the rate of falls across the study population, or if it only reduces falls in a small subset of patients. Also, analyses of research suggest that the size of the clinical study appears to affect the trial results. Most trials showing significant reductions in fall risk have been small and of short duration (91342,94132); whereas larger and longer-term studies tend to show no benefit (13073,84399).
• Fetal and premature infant mortality. Taking vitamin D during pregnancy might reduce the risk of fetal or early infant death. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy reduces the risk of intrauterine or neonatal death by 31% when compared with not supplementing with vitamin D. A sub-analysis shows that this benefit was limited to doses of up to 4000 IU daily (109055).
• Fibromyalgia. A small clinical study suggests that vitamin D might improve pain in patients with fibromyalgia. Details: A small clinical study in fibromyalgia patients with low vitamin D levels shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1200-2400 IU daily seems to reduce pain, but not mood or quality of life, when compared with placebo (91349).
• Food allergies. It is unclear if prenatal or infant oral vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of developing food allergies. Details: A meta-analysis of two large clinical studies shows that prenatal or infant vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of developing food allergies when compared with low-dose vitamin D or no intervention (108438).
• Frailty. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of frailty in older adults. Details: Frailty involves a combination of muscle loss and weakness, with exhaustion and reduced ability for physical activity. Some observational research has found that low vitamin D status is associated with frailty occurrence. However, clinical research in community dwelling older adults shows that taking vitamin D as 1000 IU, 2000 IU, or 4000 IU daily for 24 months does not prevent frailty or attenuate the worsening of frailty when compared with low-dose vitamin D 200 IU daily. Baseline vitamin D status did not affect these findings. Also, a sub-analysis suggests that vitamin D 2000 IU might increase frailty; however, only a small number of participants were randomized to this dose (109046). Other clinical research in community dwelling adults at least 70 years of age shows that taking cholecalciferol 2000 IU daily for 3 years does not reduce the odds of becoming pre-frail or frail over 36 months when compared with placebo. However, when taken in combination with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily and a home exercise program, the odds of becoming pre-frail is reduced by 39% (110829).
• Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). A small clinical study suggests that vitamin D may modestly improve anxiety in patients with GAD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with GAD shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU once weekly for 3 months, in addition to taking an antidepressant and an anxiolytic, moderately reduces anxiety scores when compared with taking these medications alone (103654).
• Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for improving outcomes in patients receiving HSCT. Details: A small clinical study in patients who have undergone an autologous HSCT shows that taking calcitriol 0.25 mcg three times daily for 30 days can reduce the time to absolute lymphocyte count recovery, but does not affect time to recovery of absolute neutrophil and platelet counts, when compared with placebo (103665).
• Hepatitis C. Low levels of vitamin D have been associated with an inadequate response to hepatitis C therapy. Adding vitamin D to standard therapy for hepatitis C may improve viral response, especially in specific genotypes. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with hepatitis C genotypes 2-3 receiving standard therapy with PEG-interferon and ribavirin shows that adding vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 24 weeks results in 95% of patients achieving undetectable levels of hepatitis C RNA, compared to only 77% of patients treated with standard therapy alone (98917). Another small clinical study in patients with hepatitis C genotype 1b receiving the same standard therapy shows that adding vitamin D 1000 IU daily for 16 weeks results in about 79% of patients achieving undetectable levels of hepatitis C RNA, compared to about 55% of patients treated with standard therapy alone. The TT genotype seems to be especially susceptible to vitamin D supplementation, while TG/GG genotype does not seem to be susceptible (98923).
• HIV/AIDS. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for improving bone mineral density (BMD) in children and young adults with HIV. Details: Vitamin D deficiency and hyperparathyroidism are common in children and young adults with HIV. A meta-analysis of two clinical trials in this population shows that taking cholecalciferol for 12 months does not improve spine BMD when compared with placebo. Also, an analysis of two clinical trials shows that taking doses of 1600 IU to 4000 IU daily does not improve spine BMD when compared with taking doses of 400-800 IU daily. However, taking higher dose vitamin D has a small beneficial effect on total BMD when compared with taking lower doses. There was no improvement on parathyroid hormone levels (110824). This meta-analysis is limited by the availability of small clinical trials, as well as the heterogeneous doses of vitamin D used in the included studies.
• Hyperlipidemia. Although population research has found that higher vitamin D levels are associated with improved lipid levels, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial. Details: Population research has found that higher vitamin D levels are associated with lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels and higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels when compared with lower vitamin D levels (15630,98919). However, supplementation might not be beneficial. A meta-analysis of small clinical studies suggests that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol, ergocalciferol, alfacalcidol, or calcitriol slightly increases LDL cholesterol, but does not affect total cholesterol, triglycerides, or HDL cholesterol, when compared with placebo (84642). The validity of these findings is limited by the variability in patient populations, vitamin D dose and formulation, and study duration. Also, none of the included studies were prospectively designed to test the effect of vitamin D on lipid levels. Another meta-analysis of clinical studies in a mixed population of healthy patients and patients with metabolic disease shows that taking vitamin D 1400-50,000 IU weekly with calcium 500-2000 mg daily results in very modest improvements in total cholesterol, triglyceride, and HDL cholesterol levels, but not LDL or very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that effects are more pronounced in patients with metabolic disease (107227). The validity of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies, which persisted throughout subgroup analyses.
• Hyperthyroidism. Oral vitamin D has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Observational research suggests that serum vitamin D levels are decreased in patients with newly diagnosed Graves' disease. A small preliminary clinical trial in patients with newly diagnosed Graves' disease taking methimazole and low levels of selenium and vitamin D shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol for 270 days, in combination with selenium for the first 180 days, modestly reduces levels of serum free thyroxine and improves quality of life when compared with no vitamin D or selenium. However, taking vitamin D and selenium did not affect levels of free triiodothyronine or positive thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor antibody (109049).
• Hypothyroidism. It is unclear if vitamin D is beneficial in the treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism. Details: A preliminary clinical study in patients with vitamin D deficiency and subclinical hypothyroidism shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 2 weeks improves mean thyroid stimulating hormone levels by 3.55 mIU/L from baseline. The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group (107213).
• Ichthyosis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with inherited ichthyosis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with congenital non-syndromic ichthyosis shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 24 weeks reduces the clinical severity of disease at 12 weeks, but not 24 weeks, when compared with baseline. When compared with patients taking acitretin 0.5 mg/kg daily, results were similar at both 12 and 24 weeks, but it is unclear if the improvement from baseline differed between groups (108441).
• IgA vasculitis. It is unclear if oral alfacalcidol is beneficial in children with IgA vasculitis. Details: A clinical study in children with IgA vasculitis shows that taking alfacalcidol 0.25 mcg daily along with vitamin C, rutin, dipyridamole, cimetidine, calcium, and glucocorticoids for 4 weeks improves rates of recurrence and incidence of kidney damage when compared with those receiving the same regimen without alfacalcidol. Alfacalcidol also improves cellular immune function and reduces levels of inflammatory biomarkers (107212).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for IBS; the available research is conflicting. Details: Although some meta-analyses show that taking vitamin D is moderately more effective than placebo for improving IBS symptom severity and quality of life, other analyses disagree. Doses of vitamin D have included 50,000 IU weekly or every 2 weeks or 2000-4000 IU daily for up to 6 months (109041,109054,109057). The reasons for these discrepancies might be attributed to the inclusion criteria related to the individual trials, the small sample sizes, and varied dosing strategies used in the available research.
• Kidney transplant. It is unclear if oral cholecalciferol is beneficial for improving allograft function or preventing non-skeletal complications in kidney transplant recipients. Details: Following a kidney transplant, patients are at increased risk of vitamin D insufficiency and related outcomes. A large clinical trial shows that taking a high dose of cholecalciferol for 2 years does not reduce the composite risk of developing type 2 diabetes, major cardiovascular events, or cancer, or death when compared to taking a lower dose. The high and low doses of vitamin D were 100,000 IU or 12,000 IU, respectively, every 2 weeks for 2 months, followed by monthly doses for the next 22 months (110830). The effect of a high dose of vitamin D on these outcomes individually is not clear. However, taking vitamin D does not seem to improve allograft function. A clinical study in kidney transplant recipients shows that taking cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily, beginning 1-month posttransplant and continuing for 11 months, has no effect on allograft function when compared with placebo (108425).
• Kidney transplant-related bone loss. Oral vitamin D might be beneficial for preventing bone loss associated with kidney transplantation. Details: A large clinical trial shows that taking a high dose of cholecalciferol for 2 years modestly reduces the odds of a fracture by 76% when compared to taking a lower dose. The high and low doses of vitamin D were 100,000 IU or 12,000 IU, respectively, every 2 weeks for 2 months, followed by monthly doses for the next 22 months (110830). A prespecified secondary analysis of a clinical study in patients at 1-month post-kidney transplant from a living donor in Japan shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 4000 IU daily for months 1-12 posttransplant reduces whole blood parathyroid hormone levels by 15%, but does not alter levels of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5-b or bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, when compared with placebo. The greatest effects on parathyroid hormone levels are observed in those with more severe vitamin D deficiency, hypocalcemia, and more preserved kidney function. Vitamin D supplementation also attenuates changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, but not the distal radius, from prior to transplant. Patients taking vitamin D had a loss of only 0.2%, compared with a loss of 2% in those receiving placebo. The greatest effects are observed in those with osteoporosis or osteopenia (107220). Conversely, a small clinical trial shows that taking calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) 0.25 mcg daily in combination with calcium carbonate 500 mg daily does not decrease bone loss associated with kidney transplantation. However, calcitriol might reduce osteoclast suppression, help maintain trabecular bone volume and wall thickness, and improve axial BMD (4823).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). Taking vitamin D might slow prediabetes progression to diabetes in people with low baseline levels of vitamin D or in people achieving high levels of vitamin D following supplementation. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial in people with prediabetes and sufficient vitamin D levels. Details: Observational research has found that low vitamin D levels are linked with a higher risk of prediabetes and higher dietary vitamin D is linked with a lower chance of developing diabetes (84594,103669). Meta-analyses and individual clinical studies in patients with prediabetes and unclear or sufficient vitamin D levels show that vitamin D supplementation might improve some glycemic indices, but does not seem to prevent progression of prediabetes to diabetes (84594,91347,99769,108421). However, a more recent meta-analysis of three clinical studies that were designed to evaluate the preventative effects of oral vitamin D in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking vitamin D reduces the risk of developing diabetes with an absolute risk reduction of 3.3% over 3 years compared with taking placebo. However, the actual risk reduction was highly dependent on the intra-trial vitamin D status. Patients achieving the highest serum vitamin D levels had absolute 3-year risk reductions of 11.4% to 18.1%. Doses of vitamin D used in this research include cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily or 20,000 IU weekly or eldecalcitol 0.75 mcg daily (110810). In patients with vitamin D deficiency and prediabetes, vitamin D might improve beta-cell function, suggesting reduced disease progression (99768,107210). One clinical study in adults with vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 3 months, and then monthly for 3 months, modestly improves insulin resistance and beta-cell function as measured by the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), but does not affect fasting or postprandial glucose levels when compared with placebo (99768). Further, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients with vitamin D deficiency and prediabetes shows that oral vitamin D at a median dose of 50,000 IU weekly for 26 weeks modestly improves fasting blood glucose and some markers of islet function, but not postprandial blood glucose or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, when compared with control. Additionally, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving vitamin D supplementation regressed from prediabetes to normal glucose status (107210). Conversely, a study in females with vitamin D deficiency and prediabetes shows that taking vitamin D 60,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose of 200 IU daily after repletion, has no effect on the incidence of type 2 diabetes at 2 years (107211).
• Infant development. It is unclear if giving oral vitamin D in doses above the recommended dietary allowance during infancy is beneficial for improving neurodevelopment. It is also unclear if oral vitamin D during pregnancy is beneficial for improving cognitive development in the offspring. Details: Clinical research shows that giving vitamin D 1200 IU daily to healthy term infants of Northern European ethnicity starting at 2 weeks of age does not improve measures of neurodevelopment at 2 years of age when compared with giving the standard dose of vitamin D 400 IU (106121). Overall, the evidence from population research is mixed as to whether vitamin D status during gestation is associated with infant developmental outcomes. However, some population research has found that increased vitamin D status during pregnancy is associated with improved anthropomorphic and neurodevelopmental outcomes (104621,105724). Two meta-analyses of observational research show that low vitamin D status during pregnancy is associated with reduced head circumference and cognitive development scores, and higher odds of the offspring developing autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (105724,105725). However, one meta-analysis suggests these risks may be limited to those with very low vitamin D status (serum level < 12 ng/mL) (105724). Multiple meta-analyses show that vitamin D status during pregnancy does not appear to affect motor development (105724,105725). In one observational study, plasma vitamin D concentrations in the second trimester of pregnancy was associated with increased IQ scores in the offspring at age 4-6 years. Each 10 ng/mL increase in vitamin D levels was associated with a 1.17-point increase in IQ (104621). In contrast, clinical research shows that taking vitamin D3 2800 IU daily during the third trimester does not improve neurodevelopmental outcomes in the first 6 years of life when compared to taking lower doses of 400 IU daily (104623).
• Infertility. It is unclear if oral or intramuscular vitamin D is beneficial in females with infertility. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in infertile females shows that although there was no effect of taking vitamin D on implantation rate or miscarriage, taking vitamin D increases the odds of clinical pregnancy by 49% compared with taking placebo. However, sub-analyses of clinical and observational research found that benefits on clinical pregnancy rates were limited to populations with vitamin D insufficiency, but not vitamin D deficiency, and for doses between 1000 to 10,000 IU daily for 30-90 days (110818). Most studies included in the analysis used oral vitamin D; however, intramuscular vitamin D was used in one cohort study. A smaller meta-analysis of clinical studies in females with infertility and vitamin D insufficiency undergoing IVF shows that taking vitamin D increases the rate of chemical pregnancy by 50%, but has no effect on the clinical pregnancy rate (108432).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D prevents lung cancer or improves lung cancer prognosis. Details: A small meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational research has found that high intake of vitamin D is associated with a 10% reduction in the risk of developing lung cancer when compared with low vitamin D intake. In terms of prognosis, high vitamin D intake is associated with improvements in both overall survival and relapse-free survival (107217).
• Low birth weight. It is unclear if oral vitamin D can reduce the risk for low birth weight; the available evidence is conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that a very low vitamin D status (serum level <12 ng/mL) during pregnancy is associated with lower birth weight and increased odds of SGA births. However, these risks have not been demonstrated in those with less severe vitamin D deficiency (serum level <20 ng/mL) (105724). Most research also shows that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy reduces the risk of low birth weight. A meta-analysis of three clinical trials shows that supplementation with vitamin D 800-1000 IU daily starting between 27 and 32 weeks' gestation, or 200,000 IU administered as a single dose or in two divided doses during the seventh and eighth month of pregnancy, reduces the risk of delivering a low birth weight infant by 60% (84659). Other meta-analyses of clinical research confirm that supplementation with vitamin D during pregnancy results in a 45% to 60% reduced risk of low birth weight and a 103 gram greater average birth weight (99766,100897). However, some meta-analyses show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of low birth weight when compared with no supplementation (95910,109055). One meta-analysis that included studies that did not directly measure birth weight shows no effect of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on the rate of low birth weight, despite showing an increase in overall birth weight of about 58 grams (95910).
• Male infertility. It is unclear if oral cholecalciferol is beneficial in males with infertility. Details: A small clinical study in males with infertility shows that taking cholecalciferol 2500 IU daily for 6 months modestly improves progressive sperm motility, sperm concentration, and sperm morphology when compared with baseline (108427). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Melanoma. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with melanoma. Details: A meta-analysis of 14 observational studies suggests that vitamin D deficiency is associated with a 45% greater risk of melanoma when compared with normal vitamin D levels (112027). However, a small clinical study in patients with newly resected stage II melanoma shows that taking vitamin D3 100,000 IU every 50 days for 3 years does not improve disease-free survival when compared with placebo. Most patients in this study had vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency at baseline (106113).
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing or treating metabolic syndrome. Details: In patients with metabolic syndrome, clinical research shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 16 weeks does not affect most metabolic or anthropometric factors when compared with placebo, although there was a modest decrease in triglyceride levels (106123). However, almost all of the individuals in this study were vitamin D deficient or insufficient, and many remained in that category even after supplementation. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial in vitamin D sufficient patients with metabolic syndrome. There is conflicting evidence about the association between vitamin D and metabolic syndrome (14265,16713,98234). Some population research has found that higher vitamin D levels are associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome, while other research found no association (14265,16713). Furthermore, a small clinical trial in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that taking vitamin D 20,000 IU or 40,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks does not affect metabolic risk factors when compared with placebo (98234).
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if oral vitamin D reduces the frequency of migraine. Details: A meta-analysis of three small high-quality clinical studies in patients with migraine shows that taking vitamin D 2000 or 4000 IU daily for 12-24 weeks or 500,000 IU weekly for 2 months reduces the frequency of migraines by 2-3 attacks monthly when compared with usual care or placebo (108439).
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Although vitamin D supplementation has been linked with a lower risk of developing MS, taking oral vitamin D supplements does not seem to reduce MS relapses. Details: Population research suggests that long-term supplementation with vitamin D 400 IU is associated with a 40% lower risk of MS in females. The effect seems to be dose-dependent. Consumption of at least 400 IU daily, mainly in the form of a multivitamin supplement, appears to have the greatest protective effect (11356). Additional population research in over 7 million people suggests that higher levels of calcifediol are associated with a lower risk of developing MS. In White adults, for every 20 ng/mL increase in vitamin D levels, there appears to be a 41% decrease in MS risk. However, this was not found in Black and Hispanic adults (15159). Vitamin D supplementation has also been examined in patients with MS. Population research suggests that taking vitamin D supplements and the maintenance of optimal blood levels of vitamin D are associated with a reduction in the development of new areas of demyelination detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over 24 months. However, there were no correlations between taking vitamin D or vitamin D blood levels and clinical outcomes (110816). Also, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to impact MS relapses or most symptoms in patients with MS. Meta-analyses of preliminary clinical research show that vitamin D supplementation does not affect the rate of MS relapses, overall symptoms, or the number of MS nerve lesions detected by MRI, regardless whether the vitamin D was low-dose or high-dose (98192,98914,106119). However, one meta-analysis of 6 small clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D for 8-96 weeks slightly improves fatigue scores when compared with placebo (112024). These analyses are limited by the small size and heterogeneity of most of the included studies and variability in dosing and duration of vitamin D regimens.
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral vitamin D improves muscle strength in middle aged or older adults with low or sufficient levels of vitamin D. The available research is conflicting. Details: Clinical research in healthy older adults who are not deficient in vitamin D shows that oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation, with 800 IU, 1000 IU, or 2000 IU daily or 50,000 IU monthly, alone or in combination with a resistance training program, does not increase muscle strength when compared with placebo (11814,104619,108429). In patients 40-80 years of age with low vitamin D levels, taking vitamin D3 100,000 IU (2500 mcg) once, followed by 20,000 IU (500 mcg) weekly for 4 months, does not improve muscle strength when compared with placebo (103658). Similarly, one meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D does not increase grip strength, muscle mass, or muscle power when compared with control (91341). However, some research has found some benefit with the use of vitamin D supplements. One meta-analysis shows that taking vitamin D increases grip strength after menopause when compared with placebo or low-dose vitamin D, although a sub-analysis shows that beneficial effects are limited to individuals aged 60-69 years, when vitamin D is taken without calcium, when baseline vitamin D levels are at least 30 ng/mL, or when the treatment consists of the vitamin D analog alfacalcidol. This suggests heterogeneity between studies (109048). Another meta-analysis in elderly adults shows that taking vitamin D as calcifediol 10-30 mcg daily for a median of 24 weeks modestly improves hand grip strength and leg extension, but not leg flexion, when compared with baseline (109042). Also, some individual clinical research in older adults with low levels of vitamin D at baseline shows that taking vitamin D3 800 IU daily or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) 1000 IU daily for 12 months in combination with calcium 1000 mg daily modestly improves lower extremity or hip strength by 8% to 23% when compared with calcium alone (38915,84530).
• Myalgia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for reducing myalgia associated with obesity. Details: Preliminary clinical research in obese individuals with vitamin D deficiency who are on a low-calorie diet shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly, alone or in combination with an aerobic exercise program three times weekly for 12 weeks, modestly reduces muscle pain when compared with only aerobic exercise three times weekly (106118).
• Myelodysplastic syndromes. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Details: A small observational study in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes has found that taking calcitriol or calcifediol orally is associated with slowed disease progression (11825).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral or intramuscular vitamin D is beneficial in children or adults with NAFLD. Details: Although findings from individual research are mixed, one meta-analysis of mainly small clinical trials in patients with NAFLD shows that vitamin D modestly improves insulin resistance and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, with no effect on serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels. Most studies included in the analysis used oral vitamin D 1000 IU daily or 50,000 IU weekly or biweekly for 3-6 months and compared with placebo; however, one study used a single intramuscular injection of vitamin D 600,000 IU compared with lifestyle modifications (109056). Vitamin D has also been evaluated in combination with fish oil. A clinical study in adults with NAFLD shows that taking oral vitamin D3 1680 IU daily in combination with fish oil or fish oil alone for 3 months improves serum ALT levels similarly to a control group (107186). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for use in children with NAFLD. One clinical study in children with obesity and biopsy-proven NAFLD shows that taking oral vitamin D3 2000 IU daily for 6 months with a hypocaloric diet improves liver histopathology in terms of steatosis, lobular inflammation, and NAFLD activity score at 6 months, but not hepatocyte ballooning or fibrosis, when compared with baseline. These improvements were not seen in the group receiving placebo with a hypocaloric diet, but it is unclear if the improvement from baseline differed between groups (107222).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking vitamin D3 1000 IU daily for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking vitamin D3 with calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate reduces the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but has no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma. Vitamin D taken alone has no effect on the risk for either type of cancer (104622).
• Obesity. The evidence for the use of oral vitamin D in obesity is conflicting and unclear. Details: Population research has found that people with lower vitamin D levels are significantly more likely to be obese when compared to people with higher vitamin D levels (15630). Also, a large-scale, high-quality clinical trial in postmenopausal adults taking calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily for 3 years shows that these patients are more likely to lose weight and maintain their weight when compared with those taking placebo. This beneficial effect is mainly seen in females who have inadequate intake of calcium, less than 1200 mg/day, before starting a calcium supplement (15604). However, other evidence suggests that vitamin D alone does not improve weight loss. One clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D3 2000 IU/day without calcium for 12 months does not increase weight loss when compared with placebo in overweight and obese postmenopausal adults who are deficient in vitamin D at baseline (91345).
• Orthostatic hypotension. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for prevention of orthostatic hypotension. Details: A secondary analysis of a clinical study in older patients with vitamin D insufficiency who are at an increased risk for falls shows that taking vitamin D 1000-4000 IU daily for up to 2 years has no effect on the risk of orthostatic hypotension or orthostatic symptoms when compared with those receiving vitamin D 200 IU daily (107223).
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for osteoarthritis. Details: The evidence for the use of vitamin D in osteoarthritis is conflicting. Some clinical research shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily, or at a higher dose to reach serum vitamin D levels over 36 ng/mL, for 2 years does not reduce knee pain or loss of cartilage when compared with placebo in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (84688). However, another clinical study shows that taking vitamin D3 daily for 10 days and then vitamin D3 60,000 IU monthly for 12 months modestly reduces pain and improves function when compared with placebo in patients with osteoarthritis and vitamin D insufficiency (98199). It is possible that higher doses of vitamin D have an effect on osteoarthritis, while lower doses do not. Due to this conflicting and low-quality evidence, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommends against the use of vitamin D for any form of osteoarthritis (102114).
• Otitis media. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with otitis media. Details: The relationship between vitamin D status and otitis media is unclear. Population research has found that having otitis media is associated with lower blood levels of vitamin D; however, lower vitamin D levels were not associated with greater risk of otitis media (98194).
• Overactive bladder. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for overactive bladder. Details: A large clinical trial in older males shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily for 5 years does not reduce the odds of weekly overactive bladder when compared with placebo. In males with low serum vitamin D, taking vitamin D reduces the odds of overactive bladder at 5 years by 49%, including 34% reduced odds of overactive bladder with urinary incontinence and 81% reduced odds of overactive bladder without incontinence. However, urinary incontinence while sleeping or napping was increased (109738).
• Overall mortality. Taking oral vitamin D alone does not seem to reduce mortality; however, there is some evidence that taking certain forms of vitamin D with calcium might have a modest benefit. Details: While higher vitamin D levels have been associated with a small reduction in mortality when compared with lower vitamin D levels (98187), clinical research shows that taking vitamin D does not reduce the risk of mortality. The most comprehensive meta-analysis to date shows that vitamin D supplementation alone does not reduce all-cause mortality when compared to control (100900). However, giving vitamin D with calcium may modestly reduce the risk of mortality. Meta-analyses show a 4% to 9% reduced risk of mortality when trials of vitamin D alone and vitamin D with calcium are pooled together (16102,97296,98186,112022). Finally, some research suggests that the type of vitamin D supplementation might influence the results. A meta-analysis of clinical research found that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) with or without calcium reduces mortality risk by 6%, while alfacalcidol, calcitriol, and vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) do not have benefit (84595,98186).
• Pain (chronic). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for chronic pain. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with chronic pain shows that taking vitamin D for 1-24 months produces a 43% greater decrease in pain score when compared with placebo. However, the final follow-up pain score is similar for both groups (96402). The effect of vitamin D on pain based on pain-related diagnosis, vitamin D status, or dose is unknown.
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for this condition. Details: Population research found that higher levels of vitamin D are associated with milder Parkinson disease symptoms, while deficiency is associated with increased risk of Parkinson disease (97000,99772). One small study shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1200 IU daily for one year might modestly slow the progression of Parkinson disease based on the Hoehn and Yars staging criteria. However, there was no improvement in disease severity according to the more widely used Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Stage (UPDRS). The UPDRS includes measures of activities of daily living and non-motor symptoms. Vitamin D had no effect on most quality of life measures (95915).
• Periodontitis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for periodontal disease. Details: A meta-analysis of mostly observational research suggests that vitamin D levels are not associated with an increased or decreased risk of periodontitis (112026). Other population research suggests that higher blood levels of vitamin D may be associated with a reduced risk of periodontal disease in adults 50 years of age or older. However, this association was not found for adults younger than 50 years (15634).
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral vitamin D improves muscle strength in elderly adults. Details: Some clinical research in healthy older adults who are not deficient in vitamin D shows that oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation, with 800 IU, 1000 IU, or 2000 IU daily or 50,000 IU monthly, alone or in combination with a resistance training program, does not improve physical performance when compared with placebo (11814,104619,108429). Also, results from one meta-analysis of clinical research in postmenopausal females with low levels of vitamin D shows that taking vitamin D does not improve the timed up and go test when compared with placebo or low-dose vitamin D (109048). One meta-analysis that included studies specifically evaluating the use of calcifediol in older adults shows a large benefit on gait speed; however, only one study included in the analysis used this endpoint and other measures of physical performance were not affected (109042).
• Pneumonia. High-dose oral vitamin D does not reduce pneumonia severity in children. Details: Although vitamin D supplementation might prevent respiratory tract infections in children, it might not prevent recurrent pneumonia. A small clinical study in children under 5 years of age with recurrent pneumonia and variable vitamin D blood levels shows that taking vitamin D 300,000 IU quarterly for 1 year does not reduce respiratory infections, severity of pneumonia, hospital admissions, or disease complications when compared with placebo (103667). However, it's unknown if vitamin D supplementation using lower and more frequent doses, or supplementation in patients with vitamin D deficiency, might be beneficial. Some observational research has found that having vitamin D deficiency is linked to a higher risk for developing community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) (102118). For information on other respiratory infections, refer to the Respiratory Tract Infection discussion.
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Oral vitamin D has mostly been evaluated in combination with calcium; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Observational research in infertile adults with PCOS and insulin resistance found that normal vitamin D levels are associated with better embryo quality and increased pregnancy rate when compared with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency (100834). It is unclear if supplementation with vitamin D improves pregnancy rates in patients with PCOS. Some research has evaluated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on menstruation and follicular development in these patients. A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin D 400-12,000 IU daily for 2-6 months improves follicular development when compared with placebo. Taking vitamin D in combination with metformin 1500 mg daily also appears to increase the number of regular menstrual cycles by 85% when compared with metformin alone. However, no effect on follicular development was seen with the combination. Vitamin D alone does not appear to improve menstrual cycle regularity. Most studies included calcium supplementation as well; therefore, the benefits of vitamin D alone in patients with PCOS are unclear (96404).
• Post-stroke fatigue. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for post-stroke fatigue. Details: A retrospective study in patients with post-stroke fatigue and vitamin D deficiency suggests that vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 600 IU daily is associated with improvements in fatigue severity at months 1 and 3 when compared with control. Neurologic disability also showed improvement at 3 months, but not at 1 month, when compared with control. It is unclear if improvements from baseline differed between groups (107225).
• Pre-eclampsia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D during pregnancy is beneficial for pre-eclampsia prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of four small clinical trials shows that supplementation with vitamin D alone or with calcium during pregnancy reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia in pregnant adults by about 50% when compared with placebo (100897).
• Precocious puberty. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of precocious puberty. Details: A meta-analysis of 43 studies, most of which are observational and involve young female subjects in China, suggests that vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency is associated with 2.25-fold greater odds of precocious puberty when compared with normal vitamin D levels. Further, this analysis suggests that taking vitamin D 200-1000 IU daily for 3-12 months along with a gonadotropic-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa) is associated with lower luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and estradiol levels and reduced bone age when compared with GnRHa therapy alone (112019).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for patients with gestational hypertension. Details: A subgroup meta-analysis of two low-quality clinical trials shows that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk for gestational hypertension when compared with control (95910).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with PMS. Details: Observational research has found that increasing dietary intake of vitamin D above 706 IU daily is linked to a reduced risk of developing PMS when compared with consuming 112 IU daily (13094). Furthermore, a clinical study shows that taking vitamin D 400 IU daily in combination with calcium 1000 mg daily can decrease the severity of PMS symptoms (16869). But it's unclear if the effects are due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. Another clinical study in adolescent females with PMS shows that taking vitamin D3 50,000 IU weekly for 9 weeks modestly reduces PMS symptoms when compared to baseline (98912). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Preterm labor. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preterm labor. Details: Vitamin D deficiency, defined as serum levels less than 20 ng/mL, during pregnancy has been associated with a 25% increased risk of preterm birth (95911). The risk seems to be especially prominent in those with darker colored skin (103662). However, meta-analyses of clinical research show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of a preterm birth when compared with no supplementation with vitamin D (84659,95910,100897,109055). The effect vitamin D specifically in vitamin D-deficient patients is still unclear. Some small, heterogeneous, and low-quality studies show that vitamin D supplementation might reduce the rate of preterm birth in vitamin D-deficient patients (84659,95910,100897). Additional studies are needed to determine the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the risk of preterm birth.
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Small clinical studies suggest that oral vitamin D may not improve symptoms in patients with RA. Details: Population research has found that higher intake of vitamin D from foods or supplements is associated with a lower risk of developing RA (12206,98200). However, a meta-analysis of two small clinical trials shows that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce pain or recurrence of RA when compared with placebo (98190).
• Rhinosinusitis. Oral vitamin D has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients over 12 years of age with chronic sinusitis shows that taking 1 or 2 sachets of a specific combination product (Flogostop Forte, Humana Italia) containing vitamin D 600 IU, black currant, Boswellia serrata, and bromelain along with a nasal corticosteroid daily for 15-30 days reduces symptoms of nasal hyperemia and rhinorrhea when compared with corticosteroid nasal spray alone (111501). It is unclear if these findings are due to vitamin D, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Sarcopenia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in older adults with sarcopenia. Details: A meta-analysis of randomized trials in older adults with sarcopenia shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 100-800 IU daily, with protein 10-44 grams daily or amino acids 2.5-6 grams daily, for 2-6 months moderately improves muscle strength, but not muscle mass or walking speed, when compared with placebo (105727). The validity of this study is limited by high heterogeneity and an unreported baseline vitamin D status. Similarly, a small network meta-analysis of randomized trials shows that taking vitamin D 500-1600 IU daily or 2500-5000 IU weekly with protein 20-80 grams daily or amino acids 3-32 grams daily with and without exercise for 3-18 months increases hand grip strength and shortens time to chair-stand, respectively, but not gait speed or lower-limb mass when compared with usual care (107221). It is unclear if these effects are due to vitamin D, protein/amino acid supplementation, exercise, or the combinations.
• Schizophrenia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for schizophrenia. Details: Based on preliminary clinical evidence, Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that vitamin D in doses of 1500 to 4000 IU daily is not recommended for adjunctive use in patients with schizophrenia (110318).
• Seasonal affective disorder (SAD). One small study suggests that a large dose of oral vitamin D can improve symptoms of SAD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with SAD suggests that a single dose of vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) 100,000 IU improves symptoms after one month when compared to baseline (83791). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Seborrheic keratosis. It is unclear if topical vitamin D analogues improve symptoms of seborrheic keratosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research suggests that topical ointments containing activated vitamin D in the form of tacalcitol, calcipotriol or maxacalcitol, applied for 3-12 months, can reduce tumor volume by at least 40% in 75% of patients with seborrheic keratosis. Additionally, over 30% of patients seem to experience complete tumor resolution or a reduction in tumor volume of at least 80% (84033). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Sexual dysfunction. One small study suggests that injecting a large dose of vitamin D might improve sexual function. Details: A small clinical study in females with vitamin D deficiency and sexual dysfunction shows that receiving an intramuscular injection of vitamin D as cholecalciferol 300,000 IU once at baseline and a second time 4 weeks later improves sexual function at 4 and 8 weeks when compared with placebo (100896).
• Sickle cell disease. One small study suggests that oral vitamin D reduces pain and improves quality of life in children with sickle cell disease with vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency. Details: A small clinical study in children with sickle cell disease shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 40,000-100,000 IU weekly for 6 weeks reduces days with pain and improves physical activity and quality of life for up to 6 months when compared with placebo. Of the children included in the study, 82.5% had vitamin D insufficiency, while 52.5% were deficient in vitamin D (98918). It is unclear if vitamin D is effective for patients with sickle cell disease who have adequate levels of vitamin D.
• Small for gestational age (SGA). It is unclear if oral vitamin D can reduce the risk for SGA births; the available evidence is conflicting. Details: Two meta-analyses of clinical research show no effect of vitamin D on the risk of SGA birth (84659,109055). However, one meta-analysis shows a 40% reduction in the risk of SGA births with vitamin D supplementation (95910). Also, one meta-analysis shows that when vitamin D supplementation is initiated before the 20^th week of gestation, the risk of SGA is reduced by 54% (109055). Most individual clinical trials are small and heterogeneous. Also, the formulation of vitamin D and/or vitamin D status at baseline may explain part of the discrepant findings. For example, a meta-analysis of observational research has found that a very low vitamin D status (serum level <12 ng/mL) during pregnancy is associated with increased odds of SGA births. This association does not seem to be present with less severe vitamin D deficiency (serum level <20 ng/mL) (105724).
• Statin-induced myalgia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for patients with statin-induced myalgia. Details: Observational research has found that taking oral vitamin D supplements is associated with decreased symptoms of myalgia in patients taking statin drugs. In a small case series, patients who discontinued statins due to myalgia were able to resume statin therapy after starting vitamin D supplements. The majority of patients with myalgia were found to be vitamin D deficient, with vitamin D levels less than 12 ng/mL at baseline (16829). An observational study has also found that administering 50,000 units of vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) once a week for 12 weeks reversed symptoms of myalgia in 92% of statin treated patients with low serum vitamin D levels of less than 32 ng/mL (16831).
• Stroke. Although low vitamin D levels are associated with higher risk of stroke, taking vitamin D supplements does not seem to reduce stroke risk. Details: Population research has found that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk of stroke. Furthermore, increased dietary intake of vitamin D is associated with a reduced risk of stroke (15630,16618,93944,97303,106106). However, clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce stroke risk. Several meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials show that taking vitamin D alone or with calcium does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with or without cardiovascular disease risk factors (16616,91343,97296,97308,106106,112022). It is difficult to draw firm conclusions from these studies, as they did not assess whether patients had adequate vitamin D levels at baseline. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation might prevent strokes in patients with vitamin D deficiency.
• Sunburn. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin D for the treatment of sunburns, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin D for this purpose.
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with SLE. Details: While some observational research has found that adults with SLE are more likely to have vitamin D deficiency than healthy controls (102119), a small cross-sectional study in females has found no association between serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, SLE disease activity, and the presence or absence of lupus nephritis (107214). A meta-analysis of three small clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily or 50,000 IU weekly seems to reduce anti-dsDNA positive, a marker of disease activity, when compared with placebo in patients with SLE (98190). However, the clinical significance of this finding is unclear. A small clinical trial in females with SLE shows that taking vitamin D3 5000 IU daily for 12 weeks modestly improves overall disease activity, but not quality of life, when compared with placebo (109735).
• Thyroid cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with thyroid cancer. Details: Observational research in patients undergoing thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer suggests that taking vitamin D daily for at least 6 months after surgery is associated with a 38% lower risk of all-cause mortality and a 33% lower risk of total cancer-related mortality when compared with no vitamin D supplementation at around 10 years' follow-up. However, vitamin D does not appear to be linked to a lower risk of thyroid cancer-related mortality in these patients (112018).
• Ulcerative colitis. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D may be beneficial in patients with ulcerative colitis. Details: A meta-analysis of mainly small clinical trials in patients treated with mesalazine shows that taking vitamin D for up to 24 weeks modestly increases clinical efficacy and reduces disease score when compared with mesalazine alone (109044). Also, a meta-analysis of small, low-quality clinical studies in patients with IBD, including Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, shows that taking high- or low-dose vitamin D for up to 1 year reduces the rate of relapse when compared with control (98915). These findings are limited because of the heterogeneity of the included studies.
• Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for dementia. Details: A large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D 2800 IU daily, starting at gestational week 24 and continuing until one week after birth, reduces the risk of the child developing croup by 3 years of age by 40% when compared with olive oil as placebo. This risk reduction did not change after adjusting for the use of omega-3 fatty acids 2.4 grams daily, as well as for concomitant persistent wheeze and/or lower respiratory tract infections (109304).
• Urinary incontinence. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D may be beneficial in middle-aged, but not older, adults with urinary incontinence. Details: Clinical research in middle-aged premenopausal females with stress urinary incontinence and low vitamin D status shows that taking vitamin D 5000 IU once weekly for 12 weeks has a moderate to large beneficial effect on the severity of incontinence and quality of life when compared with placebo. Kegel exercises were performed by all participants (109736). However, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to be beneficial for reducing urinary incontinence in older adults. In older females and males, a large clinical trial shows that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily for 5 years does not reduce the incidence or progression of urinary incontinence when compared with placebo (109738,109741). In older males with low vitamin D status, vitamin D supplementation may actually increase some types of incontinence (109738).
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention of UTIs in children. Details: A meta-analysis of 13 small observational studies in children suggests that lower levels of vitamin D are associated with 2.8-fold greater odds of UTI when compared with higher vitamin D levels. Further, this analysis shows that vitamin D deficiency in children is linked to 5.5-fold greater odds of UTI when compared with normal vitamin D levels (112030).
• Urticaria. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of urticaria. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that having urticaria is associated with a slightly lower vitamin D blood level and a greater likelihood of vitamin D deficiency when compared with individuals without urticaria. In addition, a meta-analysis of 6 clinical trials shows that taking high-dose vitamin D at an average daily dose of at least 4100 IU has a modest effect on the severity of urticaria symptoms (106115).
• Uterine fibroids. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing the recurrence of uterine fibroids. Details: A clinical study in patients with low vitamin D levels undergoing hysteroscopic myomectomy for uterine fibroids shows that taking vitamin D 1000 IU daily for 12 months has no effect on the rate of uterine fibroid recurrence when compared with placebo (108422).
• Vaginal atrophy. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for vaginal atrophy. There is limited evidence on the topical use of vitamin D in vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal adults or patients taking tamoxifen. Details: A small cross-sectional study in postmenopausal adults has found that taking a vitamin D supplement for at least one year improves the maturation index of superficial vaginal wall cells when compared with those who do not take vitamin D. However, symptoms of vaginal atrophy were not different between groups (16879). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for vaginal atrophy due to tamoxifen. A small clinical trial in females with breast cancer using tamoxifen shows that receiving vitamin D 1000 IU vaginal suppositories daily for 8 weeks improves maturation index of vaginal walls and self-reported symptoms when compared with placebo (99773).
• Vertigo. Vitamin D with calcium might reduce positional vertigo. It is unclear if the benefit is from vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking vitamin D 400 IU and calcium 500 mg twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination.
• Vitiligo. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin D for vitiligo, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin D for this condition.
• Warts. Although there is interest in using topical vitamin D derivatives for warts, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin D for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate vitamin D for these uses.

(Read more about VITAMIN D)

EFFECTIVE

• Zinc deficiency. Orally or intravenously, zinc is effective for treating and preventing zinc deficiency. Details: Taking zinc orally or intravenously prevents and treats zinc deficiency (2619). However, routine zinc supplementation is not recommended (403). Zinc deficiency requiring supplementation may occur in patients with severe diarrhea, malabsorption syndromes, liver cirrhosis, and alcoholism; after major surgery, renal failure, and dialysis; or during long-term administration of total parenteral nutrition (3900,24321). Zinc supplementation (136 mg of elemental zinc per day) in patients with cirrhosis and zinc deficiency seems to improve liver function and glucose tolerance, possibly by increasing insulin-like growth factor (8624,87520).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Diarrhea. Oral zinc reduces duration and severity of acute diarrhea in malnourished children. Doses of 5-20 mg seem to be effective, while 5-10 mg daily is less likely to cause vomiting. Details: Most research, including meta-analyses and over 30 clinical trials, show that taking zinc orally reduces the duration and severity of acute and persistent diarrhea in malnourished or zinc-deficient children, but not in well-nourished children (87236,96074). Most studies have been conducted in Bangladesh and India, so it is unclear if these findings are generalizable to other geographic locations. The most comprehensive meta-analysis of clinical studies in children older than 6 months shows that zinc supplementation reduces the duration of acute diarrhea by about 11 hours and the duration of persistent diarrhea by about 16 hours when compared with placebo. However, zinc does not seem to reduce the duration of acute diarrhea in children younger than 6 months. Zinc supplementation seems to have the greatest benefit in children with clear malnutrition and diarrhea. In these children, zinc reduces diarrhea duration by about 26 hours and reduces the risk of diarrhea persisting through days 3, 5, and 7 by 18% to 24% when compared with placebo. There was no clear benefit of using zinc in a specific dose or salt form. The most common dose of zinc was 20 mg daily and salt forms included zinc sulfate, gluconate, and acetate (96074). Also, a large clinical trial in children with acute diarrhea shows that taking zinc 5 or 10 mg daily for 14 days is non-inferior to taking 20 mg. Furthermore, zinc 5 or 10 mg results in a respective 29% and 19% lower risk of vomiting within the first 30 minutes when compared with zinc 20 mg (104045). It's unclear whether zinc supplementation reduces mortality in children with diarrhea. A meta-analysis of clinical research in children under the age of five years shows that supplementation with zinc reduces the risk of mortality from diarrhea by 15% when compared with either placebo, other vitamin and/or mineral supplementation, or no supplementation (106239). However, many studies were conducted in hospitals where rates of mortality are low and were not adequately powered to determine whether zinc has an effect on mortality in children with acute diarrhea (87210,96074,106239).
• Wilson disease. Taking zinc orally improves symptoms of this condition. Details: Zinc acetate (Galzin) is an FDA-approved orphan drug for treating this condition. Zinc blocks copper absorption and increases copper elimination in the stool of people with Wilson disease (2692,2693,87327). Small clinical studies suggest that taking zinc after 8 weeks of treatment with tetrathiomolybdate alone can improve Kayser-Fleischer rings, urine copper levels, and neurological symptoms for up to 6 years post-treatment (63588,87491).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Acne. Orally, zinc might help to reduce symptoms of acne, however it's unclear how it compares to conventional acne treatments. Topical zinc doesn't seem to be beneficial if used alone. Details: Observational research has found that people with acne seem to have lower zinc levels in the serum and skin (104056). A meta-analysis of small-low quality clinical trials suggests that taking zinc sulfate or zinc gluconate 137-300 mg 2-3 times daily by mouth can modestly improve acne when compared with placebo (104056). However, not all individual trials show benefit (87002,104056). So far, it is not clear how oral zinc compares to other treatments. Trials comparing zinc sulfate with various tetracyclines have yielded conflicting results (6505,6506,86946,106233). One large open-label clinical trial shows that taking zinc sulfate 200 mg twice daily for 12 weeks is at least as effective as lymecycline 300 mg daily for reducing acne severity. Quality of life related to acne was modestly improved in the patients using zinc sulfate (106233). However, in another clinical trial, a 3-month treatment of oral zinc gluconate 30 mg daily reduced the number of acne lesions from baseline, but was not as effective as minocycline (86946). When applied topically, clinical research shows that zinc does not help treat acne when compared with placebo (87297,104056). However, when used in combination with erythromycin, topical zinc seems to result in improvement (819,820,2687,2688).
• Acrodermatitis enteropathica. Oral zinc seems to improve symptoms of this rare genetic disorder. Details: Multiple case reports have found that taking oral zinc seems to help improve symptoms of acrodermatitis enteropathica, a rare disorder (821,2689,2690,2691). One case report in a female with necrolytic acral erythema and hepatitis C suggests that adding oral zinc sulfate 225 mg twice daily to interferon alfa-2b for 6 months contributed to resolving all lesions. Necrolytic acral erythema is categorized in the family of necrolytic erythemas that includes acrodermatitis enteropathica (6192).
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral zinc, especially in combination with antioxidant vitamins, seems to slow the progression of AMD. Details: Clinical research shows that taking elemental zinc 80 mg plus vitamin C 500 mg, vitamin E 400 IU, and beta-carotene 15 mg daily reduces the odds of progression to advanced AMD by 28%. In patients with more severe AMD, this combination reduced the odds of progression to advanced AMD by 34%. This combination also reduced the odds of visual acuity loss by 27% in patients with severe AMD (7303,11326). However, there is contradictory evidence about the effects of zinc plus antioxidants on visual acuity loss or the progression to advanced AMD in low-risk patients with AMD (6583,6584,7303). Some clinical evidence shows that, when taken without antioxidant vitamins, zinc supplementation does not slow the progression of existing AMD (6580,90069). However, a subgroup analysis of results from a large clinical trial that included patients with intermediate or advanced AMD suggests that the effect of zinc on AMD progression might vary depending on a patient's genetic predisposition. Complement factor H (CFH) and age-related maculopathy susceptibility 2 (ARMS2) are two genes for which specific variations (i.e., risk alleles) have been associated with an increased risk of AMD. Results from the retrospective subgroup analysis suggest that zinc supplementation may DECREASE the progression of AMD in patients with ARMS2 risk alleles and INCREASE the progression of AMD in patients with CFH risk alleles (90193). However, some experts question the results from this analysis due to the retrospective nature of the study (93045). Another retrospective analysis of similar data found that only zinc plus antioxidants, but not zinc alone, was beneficial for slowing the progression of AMD, regardless of the patient's genotype (93046). Consequently, the American Academy of Ophthalmology does not currently recommend routine genetic screening to determine which patients would benefit from zinc, antioxidants, or the combination. Instead, patients with intermediate or advanced AMD are recommended to take an antioxidant and zinc supplement similar to those used in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) and the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) (93047). Large scale population studies suggest that increasing dietary intake of zinc might reduce the risk of developing AMD (6579,14257).
• Child growth. Prenatal oral zinc supplementation seems to improve infant growth during the first year of life. Details: One clinical study in pregnant adults in Peru shows that taking zinc 15 mg daily in addition to iron and folic acid, starting during the first or second trimester and continuing up to one month after delivery, modestly improves growth measures of infants at one year when compared with taking iron and folic acid alone. Improved growth measures include body weight, calf and chest circumference, and calf muscle area (87130).
• Common cold. Oral zinc seems to help treat cold symptoms in adults. However, it is unclear if zinc is beneficial for common cold prevention. Details: Using zinc oral lozenges seems to be beneficial in helping TREAT the common cold in adults. The majority of clinical trials and analyses of clinical research show a significant decrease in the duration of symptoms of the common cold when adults take zinc gluconate or zinc acetate lozenges providing 9-24 mg of elemental zinc per dose. It is recommended that lozenges be taken every 2 hours while awake, starting within 48 hours of symptom onset for a total daily dose of at least 75 mg in order to attain a mean cold duration reduction of 3 days (333,334,335,337,6703,6705,87501,92212,106902). However, not all studies have been positive (333,338,339,6522,6700,87512). The reasons for these different findings are not clear, but might be due to differences in zinc formulations and doses and study methodologies. In some cases, flavoring agents such as citric acid, mannitol, and sorbitol might chelate zinc and decrease zinc ionization. Since ionization is thought to be necessary for zinc activity, a decrease in zinc ionization could decrease effectiveness (300,340,6522). Some of the positive studies have also been criticized for inadequately blinding the unpleasant, distinctive taste of zinc (6522,6706). Allergy and smoking status do not appear to impact the efficacy of zinc acetate lozenges (92212). Overall, zinc products may be beneficial for modestly reducing the duration of symptoms of the common cold in adults, but adverse effects such as bad taste and nausea may limit their usefulness (18216). There is conflicting evidence for the use of oral zinc products to PREVENT colds. Some clinical research suggests that taking zinc prophylactically does not prevent the common cold in adults (10780,10784) or children (341). However, other clinical research suggests that administering zinc gluconate lozenges can reduce the incidence of colds in children and adolescents (10803,86972). In a meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials with a total of 5446 participants, oral zinc prevented 5 viral upper respiratory tract infections per 100 person months of zinc use when compared with placebo, with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 20 (106902). Intranasal zinc is not recommended for the prevention or treatment of the common cold due to the risk for anosmia. See the Adverse Effects section for more information. Some research shows that zinc nasal spray (as a sulfate, gluconate emulsion, or gluconium gel) reduces the severity and duration of cold symptoms; however, other research has found no effect (6471,8628,8629,10247,87035). Zinc nasal spray does not seem to prevent experimentally-induced colds (8628).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). While oral zinc does not seem to speed recovery from COVID-19 in non-hospitalized patients, an analysis of a small number of studies suggests that oral or intravenous zinc might reduce the risk of death in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Details: A small observational study in patients with COVID-19 has found that lower serum zinc levels are associated with worse clinical outcomes, such as admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and death, when compared wi