Z-Binder by Ortho Molecular Products

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Poisoning. Oral activated charcoal taken after ingestion of certain drugs reduces systemic drug exposure. However, it is unclear if it affects clinical endpoints such as morbidity or mortality. Details: Taking activated charcoal orally appears to be effective when used as part of standard treatment for some, but not all, acute poisonings (12392,12393,93198,93606,93607,93613,94730). Single doses of activated charcoal, 25-100 grams in adults (10-50 grams in children, depending on age), are effective for preventing absorption of some drugs, including acetaminophen, aminophylline, amiodarone, aspirin, atenolol, carbamazepine, digoxin, fluoxetine, indomethacin, phenytoin, valproate, and verapamil, especially if taken within one hour of ingestion (93602,93610,93612,93613,94730,108852). A single dose reduces drug exposure by 38% to 52% when given within 1 hour, by 21% to 35% when given 2-4 hours after ingestion, and by about 14% when given 6 hours after ingestion. These late effects, occurring after oral absorption is complete, are due to enhanced elimination via interruption of enterohepatic circulation and binding of drug that has been actively or passively transported back into the gastrointestinal tract (105543). Multiple-dose activated charcoal, 50-100 grams initially followed by doses of 25 grams every 2 hours or 50 grams every 4 hours, or 10-25 grams per dose in children, is recommended for patients who ingest life-threatening amounts of carbamazepine, dapsone, phenobarbital, quinine, or theophylline. This is based on clinical, animal, and in vitro research showing increased elimination of these drugs (12392,105543). This increased elimination can also reduce levels of drugs that have been given intravenously, with the median half-life being decreased by an average of 45% and the median area under the concentration/time curve (AUC) by an average of 47% (105543). Additional research suggests that multiple-dose activated charcoal may be useful for increasing the elimination of amitriptyline, digoxin, imipramine, moxifloxacin, nadolol, phenytoin, piroxicam, and sotalol. Evidence supporting the use of multiple-dose activated charcoal in aspirin, doxepin, tobramycin, valproate, or vancomycin overdose is limited or conflicting (12392,105543). While activated charcoal may reduce absorption of some toxic agents, there is contradictory evidence about whether it improves clinical outcomes (12392,93200,93601,93613,94730). Administering activated charcoal 50 grams every 6 hours for carbamazepine poisoning decreases the duration of coma by 9 hours, the duration of mechanical ventilation by 12 hours, and the length of hospital stay by 9 hours. However, activated charcoal does not reduce the duration of hospitalization, intensive care admission, vomiting, or mortality when compared with control after oral overdose of benzodiazepines, acetaminophen, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (93200). Other preliminary clinical research in patients with phenytoin toxicity shows that taking activated charcoal 50 grams orally every 4 hours reduces the time to return to therapeutic levels by about 22 hours when compared with control, but without reducing symptoms (93609). In patients with pesticide or yellow oleander seed toxicity, neither single-dose nor multi-dose regimens of activated charcoal reduce mortality, seizures, or the need for intubation when compared with control (93601).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Celiac disease. Although there is interest in using activated charcoal for acute gluten exposure in those with celiac disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of activated charcoal for this purpose.
• Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. It is unclear if oral activated charcoal is beneficial in patients with chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children treated with irinotecan shows that taking activated charcoal 250 mg the night before the first infusion and every 8 hours thereafter until the end of the cycle reduces the risk of diarrhea by 60% when compared with no treatment. Activated charcoal also appears to reduce the risk of severe diarrhea by 92% and to decrease chemotherapy discontinuation by 87% in these patients (93608).
• Cholestasis. It is unclear if oral activated charcoal is beneficial in patients with pregnancy-induced cholestasis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in pregnant patients with cholestasis shows that taking activated charcoal 50 grams orally three times daily for 8 days decreases bile acid levels by about 50%, compared with an increase in those not taking activated charcoal. However, itching was not significantly improved with activated charcoal when compared with control (126).
• Constipation. Oral activated charcoal has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effects when used alone are unclear. Details: A clinical study in patients with chronic constipation shows that a specific combination product (Nucarb; Wilshire Laboratories Ltd) containing activated charcoal 180 mg, calcium sennosides 50 mg, peppermint oil 0.5 mg, fennel oil 0.5 mg, rhubarb extract 250 mg, and sulfur 50 mg, taken as two tablets at bedtime for one week, followed by 1 tablet at bedtime for 1 week, reduces passing gas, abdominal pain, and sensation of bloating by 81%, 73%, and 72% respectively, when compared with baseline. Sensation of straining, severity of constipation, and feeling of incomplete evacuation were reduced by 69%, 67%, and 54% respectively, when compared with baseline (108853). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Dyspepsia. Oral activated charcoal has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with functional dyspepsia shows that taking a specific combination product containing activated charcoal 280 mg, simethicone 90 mg, and magnesium oxide 180 mg (Carbosymag, Laboratoires Grimberg) three times daily for one month reduces symptoms of dyspepsia, such as postprandial fullness, epigastric pain, and abdominal bloating, when compared with placebo (93199). Other preliminary clinical research in patients with dyspepsia shows that taking another specific combination product containing activated charcoal 280 mg and simethicone 90 mg (Carbosylane, Laboratoires Grimberg) three times daily for 3 months does not improve overall symptoms of dyspepsia or nausea, but does improve abdominal fullness by 20%, bloating by 20%, and slow digestion by 30%, when compared with placebo (93604).
• Flatulence. It is unclear if oral activated charcoal is beneficial for reducing the occurrence of flatulence. Details: Some preliminary clinical research shows that taking activated charcoal (Requa Charcocaps) 582 mg after a gas-producing meal significantly decreases the number of flatus events when compared with placebo. On average, subjects taking activated charcoal reported less than 3 flatus events over 8 hours, compared with more than 14 flatus events in those taking placebo (12395). However, other preliminary clinical research shows that taking activated charcoal 520 mg at breakfast, lunch, dinner, and bedtime for 7 days does not significantly reduce excessive gas or total flatus events when compared with baseline (12396).
• Hangover. There is no reliable evidence that activated charcoal prevents or treats hangover. Details: Activated charcoal is included in some hangover remedies. However, ethanol adsorbs poorly to activated charcoal (12400).
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral activated charcoal is beneficial in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Details: Some preliminary clinical research in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking activated charcoal 4-32 grams daily for 3 weeks decreases total cholesterol by up to 29% and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by up to 41% when compared with control. The effects of activated charcoal appear to be dose-dependent. Additional clinical research shows that taking activated charcoal 20 grams twice daily for 3 weeks is as effective as cholestyramine 8 grams twice daily for treating hypercholesterolemia (12398), but the combined use of activated charcoal and cholestyramine does not appear to confer additional benefit when compared with either agent alone (12397). However, other research suggests that activated charcoal is not effective for treating hypercholesterolemia (12399). Reasons for the discrepancies are unclear but may relate to the small size of the latter study, and the inclusion of some patients without hyperlipidemia.
• Hyperphosphatemia. Oral activated charcoal might reduce the incidence of hyperphosphatemia in patients with kidney disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research in a small number of patients with stage 3 or 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) shows that taking activated charcoal 0.6-1.2 grams three times daily for 12 months reduces the risk of hyperphosphatemia by 64% when compared with placebo. Additionally, in CKD patients who develop hyperphosphatemia, use of activated charcoal at the same dose for up to 24 months seems to delay the development of vascular calcification when compared with calcium carbonate, but not when compared with lanthanum carbonate (103193). Other preliminary clinical research in patients on hemodialysis shows that taking activated charcoal for 24 weeks, at a starting dose of 600 mg three times daily, increasing by 300 mg three times daily every 4 weeks until the goal phosphate level is reached, reduces phosphate levels to the goal in over 90% of patients when compared with baseline (93611). The lack of a control group limits the validity of these findings.
• Tooth whitening. It is unclear if toothpaste containing activated charcoal is beneficial for tooth whitening. Details: A small clinical study in adults with dental stains due to factors such as coffee or tobacco use shows that using a toothpaste containing activated charcoal (Blanx Black, Coswell SpA) twice daily for 3 months reduces visible staining, dental plaque, and bleeding when compared to baseline, but not when compared with a micro-cleaning crystal toothpaste (Sensation White, Colgate) (111718).
• Wound healing. Research on the use of activated charcoal-containing dressings for wound healing is limited and conflicting. Details: One preliminary clinical study shows that treating chronic venous leg ulcers with activated charcoal-containing dressings (Actisorb, Systagenix) for 6 weeks reduces ulcer size by 17% when compared with control occlusive or semi-occlusive dressings containing antibacterial or antiseptic agents (94731). However, other preliminary clinical research shows that treating pressure ulcers or venous leg ulcers with activated charcoal-containing dressings (Actisorb and Actisorb Silver 220, Systagenix) for 4 weeks does not significantly improve wound healing when compared with a hydrocolloid dressing (93603). More evidence is needed to rate activated charcoal for these uses.

(Read more about ACTIVATED CHARCOAL)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if oral fulvic acid is beneficial in patients with allergic rhinitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in people with allergic rhinitis shows that taking fulvic acid solution 3.8%, 40 mL orally twice daily for 7 days, reduces the size of cutaneous wheals from pollen prick tests by about 1.5 mm when compared with baseline (90589). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Alzheimer disease. Although there has been interest in using oral fulvic acid for Alzheimer disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of fulvic acid for this purpose.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if topical fulvic acid is beneficial in patients with atopic dermatitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with eczema shows that applying fulvic acid 5% in an emollient base twice daily to affected areas for 4 weeks modestly improves eczema symptom scores when compared with placebo (90588).
• Cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral fulvic acid for cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of fulvic acid for this purpose.
• Fatigue. Although there has been interest in using oral fulvic acid for fatigue, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of fulvic acid for this purpose.
• Lead toxicity. Although there has been interest in using oral fulvic acid for lead toxicity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of fulvic acid for this purpose.
• Respiratory tract infections. Although there has been interest in using oral fulvic acid for respiratory tract infections, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of fulvic acid for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate fulvic acid for these uses.

(Read more about FULVIC ACID)

There is insufficient reliable information available about the effectiveness of humic acid.

(Read more about HUMIC ACID)

EFFECTIVE

• Anemia of chronic disease. Oral and intravenous iron in combination with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are effective for treating anemia of chronic disease. Details: Iron supplementation with ESAs is effective for treating anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or chemotherapy. During therapy with ESAs, iron levels should be monitored and supplementation provided as needed to ensure that the response is not limited by lack of iron for erythropoiesis (1087,1091,20110,20111,110192). Research shows that intravenous iron appears to be more effective than oral supplements for this purpose (20112,20113). In patients with CKD, intravenous iron at total doses from 2232 mg over 6 months to 1020 mg over one week increases hemoglobin levels more than oral doses of 4-6 mg/kg daily or 325 mg daily for up to 6 months (20112). Some research has evaluated the effect of intravenous or oral iron in patients not treated with ESAs. In patients with cancer or CKD, oral iron supplements have been shown to improve iron status (110184,110192). However, overall benefits of iron alone remain unclear in treated or untreated patients with cancer and more research is needed to rule out an increase in mortality and to determine any effect on blood transfusion requirements (110192). Preliminary clinical research shows that children aged 6 months to 10 years with HIV and anemia who take elemental iron 3 mg/kg daily along with a multivitamin for 3 months have a 41% lower chance of having persistent anemia at 3 months when compared with multivitamins alone (95432).
• Iron deficiency anemia. Oral and intravenous iron are effective for treating or preventing iron deficiency anemia. The benefits of iron supplementation in people with iron deficiency without anemia are unclear. Details: Oral iron supplements, mainly as ferrous sulfate, are effective for treating and preventing iron deficiency anemia in adults, children, and infants (1089,7135,17495,17496,17497,103806,20114,20115,91183,96621)(104680,104681,112601). Other forms are also effective, including sodium iron ethylenediaminetetra-acetate (NaFeEDTA), iron(III)-hydroxide polymaltose complex (IPC), iron protein succinylate, iron bisglycinate, and lactoferrin with iron (20117,20118,110189). Treatment with iron supplements should increase hemoglobin levels by 1 gram/dL every 2-3 weeks. However, even after hemoglobin has normalized, it may take up to 4 months for iron stores to be replenished (17497). Historically, treatment of iron deficiency anemia with oral iron supplements has typically consisted of a daily dosing regimen, often taken in divided doses to reduce adverse effects. In more recent years, however, intermittent iron supplementation (1-3 doses/week) has become preferred for some patients, particularly those with mild anemia, due to better absorption and a possible reduction in side effects compared to daily dosing. One small clinical study shows that taking ferrous sulfate 60 mg on alternate days in single doses improves iron absorption when compared to once daily dosing (96630). Another small clinical study in females with iron-deficiency anemia shows that fractional iron absorption is 40% to 50% higher with alternate-day dosing compared with daily dosing. Furthermore, total iron absorption was shown to be similar for alternate day dosing of elemental iron 200 mg compared with daily dosing of 100 mg, but the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects may be lower for the alternate day dosing regimen (101514). A meta-analysis of 25 clinical trials, including 10,996 menstruating females with or without pre-existing iron deficiency and/or anemia, shows that intermittent iron reduces the risk of anemia and increases hemoglobin and serum ferritin when compared with placebo or no intervention. This meta-analysis did not identify differences in the risk of anemia, hemoglobin, or serum ferritin between intermittent and daily iron supplementation. However, it did show that females receiving intermittent dosing had a 59% reduction in the risk for adverse effects. The validity of these findings is limited by significant heterogeneity in the enrolled populations and selected dosing strategies, including frequency of intermittent dosing, total weekly dose, and duration of follow-up. In addition, the subgroup analyses performed by baseline anemia, hemoglobin, and serum ferritin, as well as duration of follow-up, showed differing overall conclusions when comparing intermittent and daily iron supplementation. While intermittent dosing appears to be beneficial when compared with daily dosing for some patients with iron deficiency anemia, intermittent dosing may be less effective than daily iron supplementation in some patients (103806). For patients with severe anemia, twice daily dosing may be preferred to alternate day dosing due to faster response. A small clinical study in patients with iron deficiency anemia shows that taking ferrous sulfate 200 mg twice daily is more effective at increasing hemoglobin levels by 3 weeks when compared with ferrous sulfate 400 mg taken on alternate days in single doses (102864). Intermittent iron supplementation has also been investigated in children. A meta-analysis of clinical research in children and adolescents with or without pre-existing iron deficiency and/or anemia shows that taking iron supplements 1-2 times weekly is similarly effective as 3-7 times weekly for decreasing iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia. However, ferritin and hemoglobin levels increased to a greater extent with 3-7 times weekly supplementation (112601). Blood transfusion may be required for some patients with severe iron deficiency anemia who have symptoms such as dyspnea and fatigue (17497). Intravenous iron should be considered in patients who cannot tolerate oral iron or in patients with chronic bleeding or intestinal malabsorption (17497). Guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology recommend treatment with iron while awaiting investigations to rule out gastrointestinal issues in adults in the absence of an alternative explanation. The guidelines recommend ferrous sulfate, fumarate, or gluconate as one tablet daily. If adverse effects occur, intake can be reduced to once every other day, or alternative oral or parenteral sources of iron can be used. Parenteral sources should be used if oral sources are contraindicated or ineffective. Treatment should be monitored and continued after hemoglobin levels are normalized (110193). Iron supplementation may also be beneficial in patients with iron deficiency without anemia, which can cause fatigue and reduced well-being, although guidelines are lacking. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in adults with iron deficiency but not anemia shows that supplemental iron improves iron stores and hemoglobin levels. In addition, iron moderately reduces self-reported fatigue, but not physical capacity, when compared with placebo. Oral ferrous sulfate was used in most studies included in the analysis; however, intravenous or intramuscular iron were also used (104684).
• Pregnancy-related iron deficiency. Oral iron is effective for preventing pregnancy-related iron deficiency. Details: Clinical research shows that taking iron orally at an average daily dose of 20-225 mg of elemental iron increases maternal hemoglobin levels by up to 1 gram/dL when compared with placebo and reduces the risk of maternal anemia by 62% to 100% (20122,20123,20124,110180,110188). Some clinicians may recommend alternating days of iron administration to reduce gastrointestinal adverse effects. A pooled analysis shows that taking iron supplements on alternating days during pregnancy maintains adequate iron intake and reduces gastrointestinal adverse effects when compared with taking iron daily (96625). Various forms of oral iron seem to be equally effective for raising hemoglobin levels (110185,110188). However, in patients with anemia during pregnancy, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose were more effective than oral ferrous sulfate for improving hemoglobin levels (110185).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Breath-holding attacks. Oral iron seems to be effective for reducing the frequency of breath-holding attacks in children with iron deficiency. Details: The incidence of breath-holding attacks is increased in children with iron deficiency or iron deficiency anemia. Most research shows that oral supplementation with ferrous sulfate 3-6 mg/kg daily for 4-16 weeks reduces the frequency of breath-holding attacks in children aged 1-72 months (20128,104682,104683). The best evidence comes from a meta-analysis of one randomized controlled trial and 11 observational single arm studies (104682). In this analysis, approximately 84% of children experienced at least a 50% decreased frequency of breath-holding attacks (104682). Some preliminary clinical research also shows that administering intramuscular iron reduces the frequency of breath-holding attacks and increases remission in children with iron deficiency anemia (20128).
• Cognitive function. Oral iron seems to be effective for improving cognitive function in children and adolescents with iron deficiency. Details: Taking iron orally seems to improve cognitive function in iron-deficient children and adolescents (20121,112600). For example, ferrous sulfate 650 mg twice daily for 8 weeks improved verbal learning and memory in non-anemic iron-deficient adolescent females (1095). Ferrous sulfate 50 mg twice weekly for 16 weeks appeared to improve attention measures in adolescent females with possible anemia (91186). Iron also appears to reverse developmental and learning deficits caused by iron-deficiency in anemic infants (1104). Some clinical research is focused on children and adolescents from low- and middle-income countries. In children aged 5-19 years with or without iron-deficiency anemia, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that iron supplementation for 3-8 months dose-dependently improves measured intelligence by a modest amount. However, there was no effect on other measures of cognition, including attention or memory (110181). Another meta-analysis of clinical research in school age children shows that taking iron for 2-12 months modestly improves intelligence, attention, and memory, but not educational achievement, when compared with placebo or no intervention. However, sub-analyses show that any benefits are limited to children with anemia (112600).
• Heart failure. Intravenous iron seems to be effective for improving recovery in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency. It is unclear if oral iron is effective. Details: Iron deficiency is common in patients with heart failure (17499,112597,112598,112599). Individual clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research in patients with heart failure show that administering intravenous iron, as ferric carboxymaltose, iron dextran, iron isomaltoside, or iron sucrose, for at least 12 weeks modestly improves quality of life, increases exercise capacity, and reduces hospitalizations when compared with placebo or standard care. However, there was no effect on all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality (17498,91179,110176,110187,112597,112598,112599). Some individual clinical trials have used intravenous ferric carboxymaltose 200 mg or iron sucrose 200 mg in patients with mild or moderate heart failure and iron deficiency (17498,91179). Guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology suggest that treatment with parenteral iron improves symptoms and quality of life in patients with functional iron deficiency related to CHF (110193). Limited research has investigated the effect of oral iron in this population. A small meta-analysis of clinical research shows with low certainty that taking iron orally has beneficial effects on serum ferritin and left ventricular ejection fraction (110178). Most research shows that taking oral iron does not improve hemoglobin levels, quality of life, or exercise capacity when compared with placebo (100970,110178). However, one small clinical trial shows that taking oral iron modestly improves iron status and overall symptoms and increases the 6-minute walking distance by about 46 meters, compared with a reduction of only 14 meters in those taking placebo (110183). Some doses used in individual clinical studies have included iron polysaccharide 150 mg twice daily for 16 weeks and ferrous sulfate 200 mg three times daily for 12 weeks (100970,110183).
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). Oral and intravenous iron seem to be beneficial for RLS. The American Academy of Neurology recommends a combination of oral ferrous sulfate and vitamin C or intravenous ferric carboxymaltose for patients with RLS. Details: RLS is commonly associated with iron deficiency anemia. Some clinical research shows that taking iron in the form of ferrous sulfate 325 mg twice daily for 12 weeks reduces RLS symptoms comparably to pramipexole. Symptoms such as leg discomfort, need to move, and sleep disturbances improved considerably in about half of the patients taking either treatment (91181). Additional clinical research shows that taking ferrous sulfate 325 mg twice daily along with vitamin C 100 mg twice daily for 12 weeks reduces symptoms of RLS when compared with vitamin C alone in patients with RLS and low-normal serum ferritin levels (94189). Based on these results, clinical practice guidelines by the American Academy of Neurology report that taking this combination of oral ferrous sulfate and vitamin C is likely to improve symptoms in patients with RLS and low-normal serum ferritin (93587). Intravenous iron may also reduce symptoms of RLS. Clinical practice guidelines by the American Academy of Neurology report that two doses of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose 500 mg given 5 days apart are likely to improve symptoms and quality of life within 28 days in patients with moderate to severe RLS, regardless of serum ferritin levels. Intravenous iron sucrose has also been evaluated in patients with RLS, but there is currently insufficient available evidence to support or refute the use of this form of iron for treating RLS (93587).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral iron does not seem to improve athletic performance. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in adults of childbearing age shows that iron supplementation improves some exercise performance measures, such as maximal oxygen uptake capacity, but not others, such as time until exhaustion and energy consumption, when compared with control (91184). Another meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with iron deficiency without anemia shows that iron supplementation improves subjective measures of fatigue, but does not improve exercise time to exhaustion or other measures of physical capacity (104684). A small clinical study in healthy children shows that taking iron supplements or consuming food providing iron 30-200 mg daily for 1-2 months improves running performance when compared with placebo. This was demonstrated by reductions of heart rate of 6.6 to 8 beats per minute during the running exercise. One preliminary study included in this analysis also showed that iron supplementation improved treadmill endurance time (20140).
• Child growth. Oral iron does not seem to be beneficial for child growth. Details: Meta-analyses of mainly preliminary clinical research show that oral iron supplementation, at doses averaging 2-80 mg or 1-10 mg/kg elemental iron daily for up to 52 weeks, does not increase growth rate in children (20131,20132,20133,95434).
• Preterm labor. Oral iron does not seem to prevent preterm labor and may actually increase the risk in malaria-endemic regions. Details: A meta-analysis of results from five clinical studies shows that maternal intake of iron as ferrous sulfate 20-60 mg daily for 14-26 weeks starting in the second trimester of pregnancy does not affect the length of gestation or increase birthweight of the infant (95434). In females from a malaria-endemic area who have never been pregnant before, another clinical study shows that taking ferrous gluconate 60 mg and folic acid 2.8 mg weekly, starting before conception and continuing to the first antenatal visit, may more than double the risk of preterm birth, defined as a delivery under 37 weeks gestation, when compared with folic acid alone (100969). Some research suggests that the adverse outcome in this latter study may be explained by a rise in hepcidin levels in pregnant patients with malaria. Hepcidin is a hormone that regulates iron absorption and distribution, and malaria can upregulate hepcidin. High levels of hepcidin can decrease iron absorption, stimulate inflammatory processes, and cause progesterone withdrawal, leading to preterm labor (102863).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• ACE inhibitor-induced cough. It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial in patients with this condition. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking ferrous sulfate 256 mg daily reduces or eliminates cough induced by ACE inhibitors such as captopril (Capoten), enalapril (Vasotec), lisinopril (Prinivil, Zestril), and others, when compared with placebo (7307).
• Androgenic alopecia. Oral iron has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients, its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with androgenic alopecia or telogen effluvium shows that taking one tablet daily of a specific product (GFM Oral, Cantabria Labs), providing an unknown dose of iron in combination with selenium, taurine, cysteine, methionine, and hydrolyzed collagen, along with conventional therapy, consisting primarily of finasteride or minoxidil, for 12 weeks improves hair loss when compared with conventional therapy alone (111636). It is unclear if this effect is due to iron, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial in children with ADHD. Details: Three small clinical studies in children with ADHD and iron deficiency shows that taking oral iron improves some measures of ADHD after 1-3 months of treatment when compared with baseline or placebo. These studies used ferrous sulfate 5 mg/kg daily, ferrous sulfate 80 mg daily, ferrous fumarate 200 mg daily for children weighing up to 30 kg, or ferrous fumarate 400 mg daily for children weighing more than 30 kg (1093,16013,110191).
• Child development. It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial for improving development in non-anemic children. Details: Some observational research has found that iron deficiency in infancy is associated with poor verbal performance and social skills in childhood (102862). It is unknown whether iron supplementation can ameliorate these developmental issues. In non-anemic infants and children, preliminary clinical research shows that iron does not improve cognitive performance; the evidence for the benefits of iron on psychomotor development is conflicting (20129,20130,91315,96616,96626).
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial for esophageal cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that taking iron supplements is associated with a 32% lower risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma when compared to never taking iron supplements. However, use of iron supplements is not associated with a lower risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (95435).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial in patients with fatigue due to iron deficiency without anemia. Details: A meta-analysis of mainly preliminary clinical research in adults with iron deficiency without anemia shows that iron reduces self-reported fatigue moderately more than placebo (104684). A specific ferrous sulfate supplement (Tardyferon; Pierre Fabre Médicament) providing 80 mg of elemental iron daily for 4-12 weeks was used in two studies included in this analysis (11406,91188).
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In patients with active IBD, intravenous iron may be more beneficial than oral iron due to impaired absorption. However, it may also increase the risk of infection in these patients. Details: Since the absorption of oral iron may be impaired in patients with active symptoms of IBD, guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology suggest that treatment with parenteral iron may be needed in patients with IBD who have moderate to severe iron-deficiency anemia (110193). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research in this population shows that administering IV iron, usually as iron sucrose or ferric carboxymaltose, increases the risk of infection by 73% when compared with oral iron or no iron (110186).
• Postoperative recovery. It is unclear if intravenous iron is beneficial for recovery following cardiac surgery. Details: A meta-analysis of low- to moderate-quality clinical research in patients with preoperative iron-deficiency anemia shows that treatment with intravenous iron before cardiac surgery does not improve the rate of transfusions or the length of stay in the intensive care unit or hospital when compared with control groups, including placebo, oral iron, or no treatment. Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous iron does not reduce postoperative mortality rates (110182).
• Postpartum depression. Although there has been interest in using iron for postpartum depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of iron for this condition.
• Prematurity. Enteral iron seems to be beneficial for some measures of development in preterm infants. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in preterm or low birthweight infants fed human milk shows that enteral iron supplementation increases linear growth and reduces the risk of anemia when compared with control groups receiving no iron supplementation. However, there was no effect on serum ferritin, weight, head circumference, cognitive development, risk of infection, or risk of necrotising enterocolitis (110177). Additional clinical research in infants born at 24-28 weeks' gestation shows that a higher average enteral iron dose by 60 days of age is positively associated with cognitive performance at 2 years of corrected age. However, this association was not present for iron doses received at 90 days of age (110190). More evidence is needed to rate iron for these uses.

(Read more about IRON)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alzheimer disease. Oral shilajit has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small preliminary clinical trial in adults with probable Alzheimer disease shows that taking shilajit 200 mg, in combination with folate and vitamins B6 and B12, daily for 24 weeks modestly prevents cognitive deterioration based on some measures compared with placebo (112637). This study lacks a complete description of methodology and findings. Also, it is not clear if these effects are due to shilajit, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Athletic performance. Although there is interest in using oral shilajit for improving athletic performance, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of shilajit for this purpose.
• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Although there is interest in using oral shilajit for BPH, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of shilajit for this condition.
• Diabetes. Although there is interest in using oral shilajit for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of shilajit for this condition.
• Fractures. It is unclear if oral shilajit is beneficial for fracture repair. Details: Clinical research in adults shows that taking shilajit 500 mg twice daily for 28 days following surgery for a new tibia fracture results in a mean time to bone union of 129 days compared with 153 days in those taking placebo (112616). This study is limited by the large attrition rate, leaving only 62 patients X-rayed for the primary outcome.
• Hyperlipidemia. Although there is interest in using oral shilajit for hyperlipidemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of shilajit for this condition.
• Hypertension. Although there is interest in using oral shilajit for hypertension, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of shilajit for this condition.
• Male infertility. It is unclear if oral shilajit is beneficial for male infertility. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with oligospermia shows that taking shilajit 100 mg twice daily for 90 days increases total sperm count by 61% and motility by at least 12% when compared to baseline. Normal sperm count was increased by 19% and white blood cell counts were reduced by 55% (112621). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral shilajit is beneficial for muscle strength. Details: A small clinical trial in recreationally-active adults with baseline maximal strength above the 50^th percentile shows that taking shilajit (PrimaVie, Natreon Inc., New Brunswick, NJ) 500 mg daily for 8 weeks modestly prevents a decline in this muscle strength after a fatiguing protocol when compared with taking shilajit 250 mg daily or placebo. However, there was no effect in the adults below the 50th percentile for maximal strength at baseline (112614). This study is limited by the inclusion of only male participants.
• Osteopenia. It is unclear if oral shilajit is beneficial for osteopenia. Details: A small clinical trial in postmenopausal adults with osteopenia or osteoporosis shows that taking shilajit (PrimaVie, Natreon Inc., New Brunswick, NJ) 250 mg or 500 mg daily, in a dose-responsive manner, for 48 weeks modestly increases bone density at the lumbar spine and femoral neck when compared with placebo (112613). The study is limited by the inclusion only of patients within 5 years of menopause lacking conventional hormonal therapy or anti-resorptive medication. It is unclear if these results are generalizable to other populations, including males or premenopausal or older females.
• Osteoporosis. It is unclear if oral shilajit is beneficial for osteoporosis. Details: A small clinical trial in postmenopausal adults with osteopenia or osteoporosis shows that taking shilajit (PrimaVie, Natreon Inc., New Brunswick, NJ) 250 mg or 500 mg daily, in a dose-responsive manner, for 48 weeks modestly increases bone density at the lumbar spine and femoral neck when compared with placebo (112613). The study is limited by the inclusion only of patients within 5 years of menopause lacking conventional hormonal therapy or anti-resorptive medication. It is unclear if these results are generalizable to other populations, including males or premenopausal or older females.
• Sexual desire. Although there is interest in using oral shilajit for increasing sexual desire, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of shilajit for this purpose.
• Sexual dysfunction. Although there is interest in using oral shilajit for sexual dysfunction, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of shilajit for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate shilajit for these uses.

(Read more about SHILAJIT)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally, short-term (12392,12393,93200,93609,93610,93611,93613). ...when activated charcoal-containing wound dressings are used topically (93603,94731).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally, long-term. Activated charcoal has been used with apparent safety in doses up to 1.2 grams three times daily for up to 3 years (103193).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally short-term. Activated charcoal 50 grams three times daily for 8 days has been used with apparent safety in pregnancy (126).

(Read more about ACTIVATED CHARCOAL)

There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of humic acid.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about HUMIC ACID)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. For people age 14 and older with adequate iron stores, iron supplements are safe when used in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 45 mg per day of elemental iron. The UL is not meant to apply to those who receive iron under medical supervision (7135,96621). To treat iron deficiency, most people can safely take up to 300 mg elemental iron per day (15). ...when used intravenously and appropriately. Ferric carboxymaltose 200 mg and iron sucrose 200 mg have been given intravenously for up to 10 doses with no reported serious adverse effects (91179). A meta-analysis of clinical studies of hemodialysis patients shows that administering high-dose intravenous (IV) iron does not increase the risk of hospitalization, infection, cardiovascular events, or death when compared with low-dose IV iron, oral iron, or no iron treatment (102861). A more recent meta-analysis of clinical studies of all patient populations shows that administering IV iron does not increase the risk of hospital length of stay or mortality, although the risk of infection is increased by 16% when compared with oral iron or no iron (110186). Despite these findings, there are rare reports of hypophosphatemia and/or osteomalacia (112603,112608,112609,112610).

LIKELY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. Doses of 30 mg/kg are associated with acute toxicity. Long-term use of high doses of iron can cause hemosiderosis and multiple organ damage. The estimated lethal dose of iron is 180-300 mg/kg; however, doses as low as 60 mg/kg have also been lethal (15).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (7135,91183,112601).

CHILDREN: LIKELY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive amounts. Tell patients who are not iron-deficient not to use doses above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 40 mg per day of elemental iron for infants and children. Higher doses frequently cause gastrointestinal side effects such as constipation and nausea (7135,20097). Iron is the most common cause of pediatric poisoning deaths. Doses as low as 60 mg/kg can be fatal (15).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Iron is safe during pregnancy and breast-feeding in patients with adequate iron stores when used in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 45 mg daily of elemental iron (7135,96625,110180).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY UNSAFE
when used orally in high doses. Tell patients who are not iron deficient to avoid exceeding the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 45 mg daily of elemental iron. Higher doses frequently cause gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea and vomiting (7135) and might increase the risk of preterm labor (100969). High hemoglobin concentrations at the time of delivery are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes (7135,20109).

(Read more about IRON)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when processed shilajit is used orally and appropriately. Processed shilajit has been used with apparent safety in doses of 2 grams daily for 45 days or up to 500 mg daily for up to 48 weeks (112613,112614,112615,112616,112617,112618,112619,112621). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of crude or unprocessed shilajit when used orally or shilajit when used topically.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of shilajit when used during pregnancy and lactation.

(Read more about SHILAJIT)

ALCOHOL (Ethanol) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D The binding action of activated charcoal may be reduced by alcohol.  Details Alcohol may lower the adsorptive capacity of activated charcoal (12400).

CONTRACEPTIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Activated charcoal may reduce the clinical effects of oral contraceptives.  Details Activated charcoal, taken in a dose of 5 grams four times daily for 3 days, may bind to, and reduce the absorption of, oral contraceptives, thereby limiting their effectiveness and increasing the risk of contraceptive failure. However, some clinical research shows that the risk for this interaction is minimal when activated charcoal is taken either 3 hours after or at least 12 hours before oral contraceptives (103192).

ORAL DRUGS Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Activated charcoal reduces systemic exposure to many drugs, including those that undergo enterohepatic recirculation, regardless of the route of administration.  Details Activated charcoal adsorbs various drugs and may reduce their absorption and/or half-life. Examples of affected drugs include acetaminophen, aminophylline, amiodarone, atenolol, carbamazepine, dapsone, digoxin, disopyramide, fluoxetine, indomethacin, moxifloxacin, nadolol, phenytoin, phenobarbital, piroxicam, quinine, sotalol, theophylline, tricyclic antidepressants, valproate, and verapamil (12392,12400,93198,93602,93610,93612,93613,94730,105543). Avoid co-administration, except after drug overdose.

SYRUP OF IPECAC Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = C Syrup of ipecac is inactivated by activated charcoal.  Details Activated charcoal adsorbs and inactivates syrup of ipecac (12394). Avoid co-administration.

(Read more about ACTIVATED CHARCOAL)

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking fulvic acid may decrease the effectiveness of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs.  Details In vitro evidence shows that fulvic acid, formed from the oxidation and polymerization of protocatechuic acid, can shorten prothrombin time in human plasma, increasing the risk of clot formation (27726).

IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking fulvic acid might decrease the effects of immunosuppressive therapy.  Details Animal research shows that fulvic acid stimulates immune function (27727).

THYROID HORMONE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking fulvic acid with thyroid hormone therapy might interfere with the ability to normalize thyroid function.  Details Animal research shows that fulvic acid increases the plasma level of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and decreases the thyroxine (T4):triiodothyronine (T3) ratio (27727).

(Read more about FULVIC ACID)

(Read more about HUMIC ACID)

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Iron reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.  Details Advise patients that doses of bisphosphonates should be separated by at least two hours from doses of all other medications, including supplements such as iron. Divalent cations, including iron, can decrease absorption of bisphosphonates by forming insoluble complexes in the gastrointestinal tract (15).

CHLORAMPHENICOL Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking chloramphenicol with iron might reduce the response to iron therapy in iron deficiency anemia.  Details Chloramphenicol interferes with erythrocyte maturation (15,3046). However, since chloramphenicol isn't usually taken for prolonged periods, this isn't likely to be clinically significant.

DOLUTEGRAVIR (Tivicay) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Iron might decrease dolutegravir levels by reducing its absorption.  Details Advise patients to take dolutegravir at least 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking iron. Pharmacokinetic research shows that iron can decrease the absorption of dolutegravir from the gastrointestinal tract through chelation (93578). When taken under fasting conditions, a single dose of ferrous fumarate 324 mg orally along with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces overall exposure to dolutegravir by 54% (94190).

INTEGRASE INHIBITORS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking iron along with integrase inhibitors might decrease the levels and clinical effects of these drugs.  Details Iron is a divalent cation. There is concern that iron may decrease the absorption of integrase inhibitors from the gastrointestinal tract through chelation (93578). One pharmacokinetic study shows that iron can decrease blood levels of the specific integrase inhibitor dolutegravir through chelation (94190). Also, other pharmacokinetic research shows that other divalent cations such as calcium can decrease the absorption and levels of some integrase inhibitors through chelation (93578,93579).

LEVODOPA Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Iron might decrease levodopa levels by reducing its absorption.  Details Advise patients to separate doses of levodopa and iron as much as possible. There is some evidence in healthy people that iron forms chelates with levodopa, reducing the amount of levodopa absorbed by around 50% (9567). The clinical significance of this hasn't been determined.

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Iron might decrease levothyroxine levels by reducing its absorption.  Details Advise patients to separate levothyroxine and iron doses by at least 2 hours. Iron can decrease the absorption and efficacy of levothyroxine by forming insoluble complexes in the gastrointestinal tract (9568).

METHYLDOPA (Aldomet) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Iron might decrease methyldopa levels by reducing its absorption.  Details Advise patients to separate methyldopa and iron doses by at least 2 hours. Iron can decrease the absorption of methyldopa from the gastrointestinal tract through chelation, resulting in increases in blood pressure (7900,20151).

MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL (CellCept) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, iron might decrease mycophenolate mofetil levels by reducing its absorption.  Details Advise patients to take iron 4-6 hours before, or 2 hours after, mycophenolate mofetil. It has been suggested that a decrease of absorption is possible, probably by forming nonabsorbable chelates. However, mycophenolate pharmacokinetics are not affected by iron supplementation in available clinical research (3046,20152,20153,20154,20155).

PENICILLAMINE (Cuprimine, Depen) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Iron might decrease penicillamine levels by reducing its absorption.  Details Advise patients to separate penicillamine and iron doses by at least 2 hours. Oral iron supplements can reduce absorption of penicillamine by 30% to 70%, probably due to chelate formation. In people with Wilson's disease, this interaction has led to reduced efficacy of penicillamine (3046,3072,20156).

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Iron might decrease levels of quinolone antibiotics by reducing their absorption.  Details Advise patients to separate quinolone antibiotics and iron doses by at least 2 hours. Iron decreases the absorption of quinolones due to formation of insoluble complexes in the gastrointestinal tract (15,3072).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Iron might decrease levels of tetracycline antibiotics by reducing their absorption.  Details Advise patients to take iron at least 2 hours before or 4 hours after tetracycline antibiotics. Concomitant use can decrease absorption of tetracycline antibiotics from the gastrointestinal tract by 50% to 90% (15).

(Read more about IRON)

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Taking shilajit with antidiabetes drugs might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.  Details Most human and animal research shows that shilajit can decrease fasting plasma glucose levels (112621,112626,112627,112630,112638). In an animal model, shilajit 100 mg per kg daily enhanced the glucose-lowering ability of both glibenclamide and metformin when given in combination over a 4 week period (112638). Monitor blood glucose levels closely. Dose adjustments might be necessary.

(Read more about SHILAJIT)

General ...Orally, activated charcoal is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, black stools, bloating, constipation, and flatulence.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Gastrointestinal obstruction and pulmonary aspiration.

Gastrointestinal ...The most common adverse reactions reported with activated charcoal are gastrointestinal in nature. Constipation appears to be the most frequent complaint, but is typically transient. Black stools, abdominal pain, bloating, and flatulence have also been reported (12392,12398,93611,103193). Rarely, activated charcoal may lead to gastrointestinal obstruction (12392).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Rarely, pulmonary aspiration has been reported in patients taking activated charcoal orally. This may happen if activated charcoal is regurgitated or if a misplaced nasogastric tube delivers activated charcoal to the lungs rather than the stomach (12392).

(Read more about ACTIVATED CHARCOAL)

General ...Orally, fulvic acid appears to be well tolerated. Topically, adverse effects seem to be rare; however, a thorough safety evaluation has not been conducted.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Diarrhea, headache, sore throat.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Kashin-Beck bone disease.

Gastrointestinal ...In one clinical trial, fulvic acid 3. 8% 40 mL taken orally twice daily resulted in diarrhea and sore throat in some patients (90589).

Musculoskeletal ...Although there is no evidence from well-conducted studies, there is concern that pollution of water with high concentrations of fulvic acids may contribute to the development of Kashin-Beck bone disease, particularly in areas in which selenium intake is insufficient (27722,27725,29971).

Neurologic/CNS ...In one clinical trial, fulvic acid 3. 8% 40 mL taken orally twice daily resulted in headache in some patients (90589).

(Read more about FULVIC ACID)

General ...None reported; however, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.

(Read more about HUMIC ACID)

General ...Orally or intravenously, iron is generally well tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, gastrointestinal irritation, nausea, and vomiting.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about oral or gastric ulcerations.
Intravenously: Case reports have raised concerns about hypophosphatemia and osteomalacia.

Cardiovascular ...There is debate regarding the association between coronary heart disease (CHD) or myocardial infarction (MI) and high iron intake or high body iron stores. Some observational studies have reported that high body iron stores are associated with increased risk of MI and CHD (1492,9542,9544,9545,15175). Some observational studies reported that only high heme iron intake from dietary sources such as red meat are associated with increased risk of MI and CHD (1492,9546,15174,15205,15206,91180). However, the majority of research has found no association between serum iron levels and cardiovascular disease (1097,1099,9543,9547,9548,9549,9550,56469,56683).
There is one case of Kounis syndrome, also referred to as allergic angina or allergic myocardial infarction, in a 39-year-old female patient without previous coronary artery disease given intravenous ferric carboxymaltose. The patient experienced anaphylactic symptoms, including headache, abdominal pain, and breathing difficulties, 3 minutes after starting the infusion. She was further diagnosed with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (112607).

Dermatologic ...Cutaneous hemosiderosis, or skin staining, has been reported following intravenous iron infusion in various case reports. Most of these cases are due to extravasation following iron infusion (112605,112611). In one case, extravasation has occurred following iron derisomaltose infusion in a 41-year-old female with chronic kidney disease (112605). Rarely, diffuse cutaneous hermosiderosis has occurred. In one case, a 31-year-old female with excessive sweating developed cutaneous hemosiderosis in the armpits following an intravenous iron polymaltose infusion (112611).

Endocrine ...Population research in females shows that higher ferritin levels are associated with an approximately 1. 5-fold higher odds of developing gestational diabetes. Increased dietary intake of heme-iron, but not non-heme iron, is also associated with an increased risk for gestational diabetes. The effects of iron supplementation could not be determined from the evaluated research (96618). However, in a sub-analysis of a large clinical trial in pregnant adults, daily supplementation with iron 100 mg from 14 weeks gestation until delivery did not affect the frequency or severity of glucose intolerance or gestational weight gain (96619).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, iron can cause dry mouth, gastrointestinal irritation, heartburn, abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting (96621,102864,104680,104684,110179,110185,110188,110189,110192). These adverse effects are uncommon at doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 45 mg per day of elemental iron in adults with normal iron stores (7135). Higher doses can be taken safely in adults with iron deficiency, but gastrointestinal side effects may occur (1095,20118,20119,56698,102864). Taking iron supplements with food seems to reduce gastrointestinal side effects (7135). However, food can also significantly reduce iron absorption. Iron should be taken on an empty stomach, unless it cannot be tolerated.
There are several formulations of iron products such as ferrous sulfate, ferrous gluconate, ferrous fumarate, and others. Manufacturers of some formulations, such as polysaccharide-iron complex products (Niferex-150, etc), claim to be better tolerated than other formulations; however, there is no reliable evidence to support this claim. Gastrointestinal tolerability relates mostly to the elemental iron dose rather than the formulation (17500).
Enteric-coated or controlled-release iron formulations might reduce nausea for some patients, however, these products also have lower absorption rates (17500).
Liquid oral preparations can blacken and stain teeth (20118).
Iron can also cause oral ulcerations and ulcerations of the gastric mucosa (56684,91182,96622,110179). In one case report, an 87-year-old female with Alzheimer disease experienced a mucosal ulceration, possibly due to holding a crushed ferrous sulfate 80 mg tablet in the mouth for too long prior to swallowing (91182). The ulceration was resolved after discontinuing iron supplementation. In another case report, a 76-year old male suffered gastric mucosal injury after taking a ferrous sulfate tablet daily for 4 years (56684). In a third case report, a 14-year-old female developed gastritis involving symptoms of upper digestive hemorrhage, nausea, melena, and stomach pain. The hemorrhage was attributed to supplementation with ferrous sulfate 2 hours after meals for the prior 2 weeks (96622). In one case report, a 43-year old female developed atrophic gastritis with non-bleeding ulcerations five days after starting oral ferrous sulfate 325 mg twice daily (110179).
Intravenously, iron can cause gastrointestinal symptoms sch as nausea (104684,110192).

Immunologic ...Although there is some clinical research associating iron supplementation with an increased rate of malaria infection (56796,95432), the strongest evidence to date does not support this association, at least for areas where antimalarial treatment is available (95433,96623). In an analysis of 14 trials, iron supplementation was not associated with an increased risk of malaria (96623). In a sub-analysis of 7 preliminary clinical studies, the effect of iron supplementation was dependent upon the access to services for antimalarial treatment. In areas where anemia is common and services are available, iron supplementation is associated with a 9% reduced risk of clinical malaria. In an area where services are unavailable, iron supplementation was associated with a 16% increased risk in malaria incidence (96623). The difference in these findings is likely associated with the use of malaria prevention methods.
A meta-analysis of clinical studies of all patient populations shows that administering IV iron, usually iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose, increases the risk of infection by 16% when compared with oral iron or no iron. However, sub-analyses suggest this increased risk is limited to patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (110186).
Intravenously, iron has rarely resulted in allergic reactions, including anaphylactoid reactions (110185,110192,112606,112607). There is one case of Kounis syndrome, also referred to as allergic angina or allergic myocardial infarction, in a 39-year-old female patient without previous coronary artery disease given intravenous ferric carboxymaltose. The patient experienced anaphylactic symptoms, including headache, abdominal pain, and breathing difficulties, 3 minutes after starting the infusion. She was further diagnosed with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (112607).

Musculoskeletal ...Intravenously, iron rarely results in osteomalacia related to hypophosphatemia (112609). At least 2 cases exist of hypophosphatemic osteomalacia. In one case, a 70-year-old male with a genetic hemorrhagic disorder infused with ferric carboxymaltose developed lower limb pain with hypophosphatemia and diffuse bone demineralization in the feet (112609). In a second case, a 61-year-old male developed femoral neck insufficiency fractures following repeated ferric carboxymaltose transfusions for anemia related to vascular malformation in the bowel (112603). Severe hypophosphatemia requiring intravenous phosphate in the absence of osteomalacia has also occurred following intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (112608,112610).

Oncologic ...There is a debate regarding the association between high levels of iron stores and cancer. Data are conflicting and inconclusive (1098,1099,1100,1102). Epidemiological studies suggest that increased body iron stores may increase the risk of cancer or general mortality (56703).
Occupational exposure to iron may be carcinogenic (56691). Oral exposure to iron may also be carcinogenic. Pooled analyses of population studies suggest that increasing the intake of heme iron increases the risk of colorectal cancer. For example, increasing heme iron intake by 1 mg/day is associated with an 11% increase in risk (56699,91185).

Other ...Intravenously, sodium ferric gluconate complex (SFGC) caused drug intolerance reactions in 0. 4% of hemodialysis patients including 2 patients with pruritus and one patient each with anaphylactoid reaction, hypotension, chills, back pain, dyspnea/chest pain, facial flushing, rash and cutaneous symptoms of porphyria (56527).

(Read more about IRON)

General ...Orally, processed shilajit seems to be well tolerated. Topically, no adverse effects have been reported. However, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: A case report has raised concerns about pseudohyperaldosteronism.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, a case of hypertension related to mineralocorticoid-excess syndrome or pseudohyperaldosteronism is reported in a 37-year-old female following the use of shilajit for 6 months during pregnancy. Electrocardiographic findings were normal. Product discontinuation and treatment with intravenous and oral potassium led to restoration of blood pressure and potassium levels (112622). The role of shilajit in this adverse effect cannot be confirmed. The presence of other ingredients or contaminants in the product was not ruled out.

Endocrine ...Orally, a case of apparent mineralocorticoid excess, or pseudohyperaldosteronism, with edema, increased urinary potassium, calcium, and magnesium loss, hypokalemia, and metabolic alkalosis, is reported in a 37-year-old female following the use of shilajit for 6 months during pregnancy. Product discontinuation and treatment with intravenous and oral potassium led to restoration of potassium levels (112622). The role of shilajit in this adverse effect cannot be confirmed. The presence of other ingredients or contaminants in the product was not ruled out.

Immunologic ...Orally, a case of allergy to shilajit made worse by exercise is reported in a 43-year-old female. Although symptoms were lacking when shilajit 400 mg was taken daily with meals for 3 months, she developed hives within an hour of taking a single dose of shilajit 800 mg. With intramuscular corticosteroids, symptoms improved but did not resolve. The next day, following a meal and physical activity she developed anaphylaxis requiring adrenaline and intravenous corticosteroids (112620).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, headache is reported rarely following shilajit intake in clinical research (112616).

(Read more about SHILAJIT)