Cardio Power Truffles by Designs for Health

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Dietary cocoa seems to be beneficial for CVD prevention. Oral cocoa extract may reduce the risk of CVD-related death, but it is unclear if it can prevent other CVD-related outcomes like myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. Details: A large clinical trial in adults without CVD shows that taking a specific cocoa extract daily for around 3.5 years reduces the risk of CVD-related death by 27%, but does not reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, including MI or stroke, or overall mortality when compared with placebo. This specific cocoa extract contained 500 mg of flavanols, including 80 mg of epicatechins (108898). In 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that very limited scientific evidence suggests that the cocoa flavanols in high flavanol cocoa powder, for products containing at least 4% naturally conserved cocoa flavanols, may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (110017). Observational research in adults without CVD has also found that consuming a higher amount of cocoa is associated with a 10% lower risk of CVD and an up to 50% lower risk of CVD-related mortality when compared with consuming lower amounts of cocoa. Consuming more than 90 grams of cocoa per week did not add further benefit (14288,97192). Additional clinical research shows that taking cocoa flavanols 450 mg twice daily for one month improves cholesterol levels and blood pressure values, resulting in improved Framingham Risk Scores in healthy patients. These scores correspond to a 21% decrease in the 10-year risk for coronary heart disease, a 22% decrease in the risk for CVD, a 31% decrease in the risk for MI, and a 30% decrease in the risk for CVD-related mortality (92273). There is also evidence that consuming cocoa might improve flow-mediated dilatation, a measure of endothelial dysfunction. Meta-analyses of clinical research have found that increased cocoa or chocolate intake significantly improves flow-mediated dilatation. This is seen with intakes of 19-54 grams of cocoa daily, 46-100 grams of dark chocolate daily, or cocoa products containing 16.6-1080 mg of flavonoids daily (17187,42059,42137).
• Hypertension. Oral cocoa seems to be beneficial for modestly decreasing blood pressure in hypertensive patients. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for preventing hypertension. Details: Overall, clinical research shows that chocolate or cocoa containing 25-1080 mg daily of flavonoids modestly reduces blood pressure in hypertensive patients (14306,15655,15752,42092,42107,42169,97190,103247). Meta-analyses of clinical research show that consuming commercially available dark chocolate or flavanol-enriched chocolate/cocoa products daily for 2-8 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure (SBP) by around 4 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by around 2 mmHg in patients with hypertension when compared to control products with low levels of flavanols or no flavanols (42169,97190). Additionally, a meta-analysis of clinical trials in middle-aged and elderly patients with or without hypertension shows that consuming cocoa products daily for 4-18 weeks reduces SBP and DBP by around 3 mmHg and 1.5 mmHg, respectively, when compared with control products (103249). Blood pressure lowering seems to occur more readily in hypertensive or pre-hypertensive individuals when compared with normotensive individuals (14306,15655,15752,42092,42107,42169,97190,103247). Consumption of cocoa might also reduce the risk of developing hypertension in normotensive patients. Observational research has found that long-term consumption of moderate amounts of cocoa (2.2 grams to 6.1 grams daily) is associated with a 7% lower risk of hypertension when compared with consumption of less than 0.61 grams daily. However, consumption of amounts greater than 6.1 grams daily does not seem to reduce hypertension risk. Also, this benefit seems to be limited to patients consuming cocoa from plain chocolate, as consumption of cocoa from desserts was linked with a 9% greater risk of hypertension (103248).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Hypercholesterolemia. Oral cocoa does not seem to be beneficial for reducing cholesterol levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Details: Some preliminary clinical research in healthy, normocholesterolemic males shows that diets high in stearic acid from cocoa butter result in lower cholesterol levels when compared with diets high in myristic acid from dairy butter. However, a diet high in stearic acid from cocoa butter does not significantly lower cholesterol when compared to baseline in this population (15063). A meta-analysis of 10 clinical studies shows that cocoa or dark chocolate can reduce total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in normocholesterolemic patients (42125). However, some preliminary clinical research in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that drinking a high-flavanol cocoa beverage daily for 6 weeks does not reduce cholesterol when compared with a low-flavanol cocoa beverage (42013). Also, while some clinical research shows that taking cocoa powder 26 grams with sugar daily for 12 weeks can increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels when compared with sugar alone in normocholesterolemic and hypercholesterolemic patients (42026), taking cocoa or dark chocolate 13-41 grams daily does not seem to lower total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol in these patients (42026,42029,42225).
• Stretch marks (striae gravidarum). Topical cocoa butter does not seem to be beneficial for preventing stretch marks during pregnancy. Details: Clinical research shows that topical application with a cream containing cocoa butter 25% to the abdomen daily, starting during the second and third trimesters and continuing until delivery, does not prevent stretch marks when compared with a placebo cream (105261). Other clinical research shows that topical application with a cream containing cocoa butter and vitamin E as tocopheryl acetate to the abdomen, breasts, and thighs, daily, starting during the second trimester and continuing until delivery, does not reduce the prevalence or severity of stretch marks when compared to a cream not containing these ingredients (105262). More research is needed in individuals of all skin types.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for improving cognitive function in healthy older adults. Details: Some small clinical studies in healthy adults over the age of 60 with or without existing cognitive impairment show that sub-chronic intake of cocoa at doses of 45 mg, 520 mg, or 990 mg once daily for 8 weeks, or as a cocoa drink containing flavanols 609 mg daily for 30 days, modestly improves some measures of cognitive function, including task switching, visual attention, and verbal fluency (42184,92269). However, it does not improve performance on the mini mental state exam (92269). Also, one clinical study in healthy adults aged 60 years and older shows that consuming a dark chocolate bar containing 11 grams of cocoa and drinking 237 mL of an artificially sweetened drink containing 11 grams of cocoa daily for 6 weeks does not improve neuropsychological function when compared with placebo (42050). Additional preliminary clinical research in postmenopausal females aged 50-64 years shows that adding chocolate 10 grams daily, containing 99% cocoa, for 6 months does not improve most measures of cognitive function when compared with not taking cocoa (105259). Reasons for the discrepancies are unclear but may relate to the dose of cocoa, the duration of intake, or the specific cognitive testing procedures conducted.
• Age-related testosterone deficiency. Oral cocoa has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy middle-aged adults shows that taking a combination product containing cocoa seed extract and pomegranate rind (Tesnor, Gencor) daily for 56 days increases serum testosterone levels and hand-grip strength and improves measures of sexual function and psychological well-being when compared with placebo (111527). It is unclear if these effects are due to cocoa, pomegranate, or the combination.
• Aging skin. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for aging skin. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with aging skin shows taking a specific product (GliSODin Skin Nutrients Advanced Anti-Aging Formula, Isocell North America Inc.) 780 mg three times daily, containing cocoa extract, as well as superoxide dismutase, krill oil, sea buckthorn, hyaluronic acid, and other nutrients, in combination with daily use of tazarotene cream 0.1%, for 90 days improves fine wrinkling, photodamage, and skin elasticity when compared with tazarotene cream and placebo (91778). Additional preliminary clinical research in patients with photoaged skin shows that drinking a cocoa drink containing 320 mg of flavanols daily for 24 weeks improves wrinkle depth and skin elasticity, but not skin hydration, when compared with placebo (92274).
• Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral cocoa for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cocoa for this condition.
• Athletic performance. Although there has been interest in using oral cocoa for improving athletic performance, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cocoa for this use.
• Atrial fibrillation. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for preventing atrial fibrillation. Details: Most population research has found that chocolate consumption is not associated with a reduced risk of atrial fibrillation (97188,97189).
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for CFS. Details: In patients with CFS, preliminary clinical research shows that consuming 45 grams of a polyphenol-rich chocolate in three divided doses daily for 8 weeks can reduce fatigue by 35%, anxiety by 37%, and depression by 45%, and can increase overall function by 30%, when compared with pretreatment (42116).
• Cirrhosis. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for cirrhosis. Details: Clinical research shows that consuming a liquid test meal (Ensure Plus) in addition to dark chocolate (Lindt Excellence 85% Cocoa, Lindt & Sprüngli) 0.55 grams/kg can reduce the postprandial increase in hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhosis when compared with the test drink alone (42164).
• Cognitive function. Research on the use of oral cocoa for improving cognitive function in healthy adults is conflicting. Details: A large clinical trial in older adults shows that taking cocoa extract containing 500 mg of flavanols daily for 3 years does not improve measures of cognitive function including global cognition, episodic memory, and executive function when compared with placebo, even when taken with a multivitamin-mineral product (Centrum Silver) (111524). Also, in middle-aged participants, clinical research shows that taking 20 grams of a dark chocolate drink mix containing 250 mg or 500 mg of polyphenols as a single dose does not seem to improve measures of cognitive function (92272). In contrast, clinical research in healthy younger individuals shows that consuming a single dose of cocoa flavanols 520-994 mg as a specific powder (Cocoapro) improves some, but not all, measures of cognitive function when examined in a situation of sustained mental effort (42093). Additionally, consuming a single dose of cocoa flavanols 900 mg as a specific powder (Acticoa) seems to improve reaction time during cognitive testing when compared with placebo in healthy adults and patients with type 1 diabetes (103251). However, acute dosing with cocoa flavanols 374-747 mg as specific powders (Acticoa) or cocoa extract capsules (Naturex) does not seem to improve measures of cognitive function, visual working memory, or ability to focus during testing in young people (99984,99985,109448). Reasons for the discrepancies are unclear but may relate to the dose of cocoa, the duration of intake, the level of stress during cognitive testing, or the specific cognitive testing procedures conducted.
• Cognitive impairment. Oral cocoa flavanols have only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; their effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults at least 55 years of age with subjective or mild cognitive impairment shows that consuming dark chocolate containing 500 mg cocoa flavanols and taking fish oil containing DHA 1.1 grams and EPA 0.4 grams daily for 12 months does not improve cognitive function scores when compared with placebo (111453).
• Constipation. Oral cocoa husk has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children with chronic constipation shows that taking 2-4 sachets containing cocoa husk 8-16 grams and beta-fructosans 2-4 grams daily for 4 weeks can reduce hard stools by 45% and reduce transit time by 36 hours when compared with a placebo (42016).
• Diabetes. Several small clinical studies suggest that oral cocoa may cause small but clinically insignificant improvements in glycemic control in patients with diabetes. However, cocoa does not appear to be beneficial for the prevention of diabetes. Details: While some individual studies show conflicting results (97252,99982), two similar meta-analyses of 8-9 small clinical trials in patients with diabetes show that taking cocoa 1-54 grams daily for up to 52 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose by around 7-9 mg/dL and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by around 10-15 mg/dL, but does not improve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin levels, blood pressure, total cholesterol, or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, when compared with control (109447,109449). This slight improvement in fasting blood glucose, along with a lack of effect on HbA1c, suggests that cocoa is unlikely to lead to clinically meaningful improvements in glycemic control. Population research has found that eating up to 60 grams of chocolate per week is associated with a lower risk of developing diabetes. Higher consumption was not found to affect diabetes risk (97192). However, secondary analysis of a large clinical study in adults aged 74 on average shows that taking an extract containing cocoa flavanols 500 mg daily, with or without a multivitamin, for about 3.5 years does not reduce the risk of developing self-reported type 2 diabetes when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis based on body mass index, level of physical activity, or multivitamin consumption did not change results (111619).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral cocoa flavanols are beneficial for preventing exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of cocoa flavanols (Chococru Extraordinary Flavanol Cocoa) 830 mg or 1245 mg within 5 minutes of a strenuous exercise protocol does not reduce exercise-induced muscle damage over 72 hours when compared with a control providing no cocoa flavanols (105260).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for fatigue. Details: A moderate-size clinical study in otherwise healthy females aged 40-60 years with fatigue shows that consuming a beverage containing cocoa flavanols 240 mg daily for 8 weeks does not improve self-reported fatigue scores when compared with placebo (111620).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for heart failure prevention. Details: Population research has found that consuming up to 250 grams of chocolate weekly is associated with reduced risk of heart failure. However, consuming 300 grams weekly or more does not appear to affect the risk of heart failure (97187,97191).
• HIV/AIDS-related dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for HIV/AIDS-related dyslipidemia. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with HIV shows that consuming dark chocolate 65 grams containing cocoa 36 grams for 15 days does not affect low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or total cholesterol levels when compared with a white chocolate placebo. However, it slightly increases levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (96472).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial in patients with prediabetes. Details: A small clinical study in premenopausal adults with overweight or obesity and mild insulin resistance shows that drinking a cocoa drink high in flavanols twice daily for 4 weeks does not improve measures of insulin resistance or insulin-mediated glucose uptake when compared with a low-flavanol cocoa drink (111532).
• Influenza. Although there has been interest in using oral cocoa for influenza, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cocoa for this condition.
• Insect repellent. It is unclear if topical cocoa oil is beneficial as an insect repellent. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that topical application of cocoa oil, 1 mL on each leg and 0.5 mL on each forearm, reduces bites from black flies (Simulium damnosum) by 99% (41954).
• Isolated systolic hypertension. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for isolated systolic hypertension. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming 100 grams daily of cocoa polyphenol-rich dark chocolate might modestly reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (13166).
• Menopausal symptoms. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for menopausal symptoms. Details: In postmenopausal individuals aged 50-64 years, preliminary clinical research shows that adding chocolate 10 grams daily, containing cocoa 99%, for 6 months reduces body fat mass by approximately 0.6 kg and body fat percentage by 0.8%, and modestly improves some measures of quality of life, when compared with no treatment (105255,105258). However, there was no effect on all measures of quality of life, general menopausal symptoms, weight, body mass index, or most measures of cognitive function (105255,105258,105259).
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Although there has been interest in using oral cocoa for MS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cocoa for this condition.
• Muscle strength. Oral cocoa seed extract has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy males shows that taking a combination product containing cocoa seed extract and pomegranate rind extract 400 mg daily for 8 weeks increases testosterone levels, hand grip strength, and upper arm circumference when compared with placebo (108485).
• Nipple fissures. It is unclear if topical cocoa butter is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of nipple fissures. Details: A small clinical study in breastfeeding adults shows that applying topical cocoa butter to the nipple and areola after each breastfeeding session for 10 days immediately postpartum reduces nipple pain, rashes, and cracks when compared with the topical application of the mother's breastmilk (111525). The validity of this study is limited by a lack of blinding and a high dropout rate.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for obesity. Details: Preliminary clinical research in overweight or obese premenopausal females shows that following a reduced-calorie diet in addition to consuming two squares of dark chocolate and drinking 8 ounces of a sugar-free cocoa beverage daily for 18 weeks does not increase weight loss when compared with the reduced-calorie diet plus a non-chocolate snack (42130,99983).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for Parkinson disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming a single dose of dark chocolate 200 grams containing approximately 80% cocoa does not improve motor function in patients with Parkinson disease when compared with a white chocolate control, although there seems to be some improvements after one hour when compared with baseline (42156).
• Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for PAD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with PAD shows that drinking a flavanol-rich cocoa beverage 15 grams daily for 6 months increases 6-minute walking distance by up to 43 meters when compared with placebo (103250). Cocoa has also been studied in adults with diabetes at risk for developing PAD, with conflicting results. A small clinical study in adults with and without diabetes shows that taking a single dose of cocoa flavanols 790 mg does not improve peripheral microvascular or macrovascular parameters compared with placebo (111529). However, another small clinical study in healthy adults and those with diabetes at risk for PAD shows that taking cocoa flavanols (CocoaVia, Mars Inc) 1350 mg improves endothelial function in the brachial and femoral arteries after 2 hours when compared with placebo, suggesting that cocoa flavanols might reduce the risk of developing PAD in both populations studied (111528). The validity of this study is limited by the small sample size and short study duration.
• Stroke. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Population research has found that the highest dietary intake of chocolate is associated with a 16% reduced risk of stroke when compared with the lowest intake (97192). More evidence is needed to rate cocoa for these uses.

(Read more about COCOA)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Topical coconut oil has been evaluated for the management of atopic dermatitis in children, with promising results. Details: One clinical trial in children with atopic dermatitis shows that topical application of virgin coconut oil 5 mL twice daily for 8 weeks results in moderate or excellent improvements in almost two-fold more patients and reduces symptom severity about 30% when compared with mineral oil (90614).
• Prematurity. Topical coconut oil may reduce the risk for hypothermia and apnea and improve body weight, length, and skin integrity in premature infants. Details: A large clinical study in premature infants shows that applying coconut oil 5 mL topically four times daily for 28 days reduces the incidence of hypothermia and apnea by 67% and 76%, respectively, when compared with body massage without oil. There were also improvements in the level of vitamin D3 and the overall neurodevelopmental score over 12 months (101873). Clinical studies in premature infants also show that oil massage using coconut oil reduces weight loss in the first few days after birth and improves weight gain and length when compared with mineral oil or no application (17937,90616,101873). Preterm infants are at increased risk for infection due to the inadequate protective barrier provided by immature skin. Clinical studies in preterm or very preterm infants show that topical application of virgin coconut oil 2-4 times daily for 21-28 days as part of routine neonatal care helps maintain skin integrity, but does not reduce the risk for infections such as sepsis, when compared with routine neonatal care alone (96204,101873). Another clinical study in preterm infants shows that topical application of coconut oil 5 mL/kg twice daily for 28 days reduces the incidence of hospital-acquired infections from 21% to 7% when compared with control, but does not reduce overall mortality (90616).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alzheimer disease. Although there has been interest in using oral coconut oil for Alzheimer disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of coconut oil for this purpose.
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral coconut oil is beneficial for improving athletic performance. Details: A small clinical trial in recreational runners shows that taking virgin coconut oil (Copra Alimentos, Maceio) 15 grams, with or without caffeine 6 mL/kg, 60 minutes prior to a 1600 meter running trial does not improve running performance or ratings of exertion when compared with a warm water control (101874).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral coconut oil is beneficial in patients with breast cancer. Details: A small clinical study in patients with invasive or advanced breast cancer shows that taking virgin coconut oil 10 mL twice daily starting one week after chemotherapy from the third to the sixth cycle improves quality of life based on some but not all measurement scales when compared with control (90615).
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). Small clinical studies suggest that oral coconut oil does not alter the risk of CHD or prevent cardiovascular events in patients with CHD. Details: One small observational study in India has found that coconut or coconut oil consumption is not associated with a decreased or increased risk of myocardial infarction or angina (14407). A small clinical trial in patients with CHD from India shows that cooking with coconut oil does not alter cardiovascular outcomes or risk factors at 6 months, 1 year, or 2 years when compared with cooking with sunflower oil (96205).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although there has been interest in using oral coconut oil for COVID-19, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of coconut oil for this purpose.
• Crohn disease. Although there has been interest in using oral coconut oil for Crohn disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of coconut oil for this purpose.
• Dental plaque. Small clinical studies suggest that pulling coconut oil through the teeth may modestly reduce dental plaque. Details: A small clinical study shows that pulling coconut oil 10 mL through the teeth for 15-20 minutes twice daily for 4 days is as effective as using a mouth rinse containing chlorhexidine gluconate-0.2% as 10 mL twice daily for 30 seconds in the prevention of plaque regrowth in posterior, but not anterior, surfaces of the teeth (101878). Another small clinical study in patients with plaque-induced gingivitis shows that pulling coconut oil 10 mL through the teeth for 5-10 minutes nightly for 30 days improves plaque scores when compared with standard dental hygiene with no mouth rinse (106491).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral coconut oil is beneficial for diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical trials shows that a single intake of coconut oil as part of a meal modestly increases postprandial glucose levels and decreases insulin levels. However, long-term intake of coconut oil increases insulin resistance, with no effect on fasting blood glucose or insulin levels. Only two studies in these analyses included patients with diabetes (107667). Therefore, the effect of coconut oil in patients with diabetes is unclear.
• Diarrhea. It is unclear if oral coconut oil is beneficial for improving diarrhea in children. Details: One small clinical study in children with mild-to-moderate dehydration due to diarrhea shows that eating a diet consisting of coconut oil, chicken, and plantain reduces the duration of diarrhea by 20 hours when compared with a cow's milk diet (19269). However, another small clinical trial in children with acute gastroenteritis shows that total duration of diarrhea is no different in children given a milk-free formula containing coconut oil when compared with children given cow's milk formula (19270).
• Dry mouth. It is unclear if topical coconut oil is beneficial for improving dry mouth in patients receiving radiation therapy. Details: One small clinical study in patients with dry mouth caused by radiation therapy shows that coating the mouth with coconut oil prior to meals and at bedtime for 2 weeks does not improve dry mouth-related quality of life scores when compared to baseline (106490).
• Dry skin. It is unclear if topical coconut oil is beneficial for improving dry skin. Details: A small clinical study in patients with mild-to-moderate dry skin shows that applying coconut oil topically twice daily improves skin moisture and skin lipid levels when compared to baseline. Coconut oil seems to be comparable to mineral oil as a skin moisturizer (17936). Also, preliminary clinical research in individuals who apply alcohol-based sanitizers to the hands six times daily shows that applying 6-8 drops (0.1 mL/cm²) of virgin coconut oil to the hands before bed for 15 days modestly increases perceived moisture content, but not perceived appearance or sensation, when compared with not using coconut oil (107668).
• Fetal and premature infant mortality. It is unclear if topical coconut oil is beneficial for reducing mortality in premature infants. Details: One clinical study in preterm infants shows that topical application of coconut oil 5 mL/kg twice daily for 28 days reduces the incidence of hospital-acquired infections from 21% to 7% when compared with control, but does not reduce overall mortality (90616).
• Gingivitis. It is unclear if pulling coconut oil through the teeth is beneficial in patients with gingivitis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with plaque-induced gingivitis shows that pulling coconut oil 10 mL through the teeth for 5-10 minutes nightly for 30 days improves gingival bleeding scores when compared with standard dental hygiene without a mouth rinse (106491). Another small clinical study in volunteers with gingival inflammation shows that pulling extra virgin coconut oil, 5 mL, through the teeth for 8 minutes daily for 28 days does not change plaque microbial counts when compared with baseline or with palm oil pulling (110010).
• HIV/AIDS. Although there has been interest in using oral coconut oil for HIV/AIDS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of coconut oil for this purpose.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral coconut oil is beneficial in patients with hypertension. Details: One small clinical study in patients with hypertension shows that taking extra virgin coconut oil 3 mL with breakfast, 4 mL with lunch, and 3 mL with dinner daily for 30 days does not reduce blood pressure when compared with placebo (106493).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Although there has been interest in using oral coconut oil for IBS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of coconut oil for this purpose.
• Lice. Topical coconut oil has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One clinical study in children with head lice shows that application of a topical spray containing coconut oil, anise oil, and ylang ylang oil (Chick-Chack) once every 5 days for three treatments eradicates lice in around 92% of infected children, a rate comparable to children treated with a spray containing permethrin, malathion, piperonyl butoxide, and isododecane (13483). It is unclear if these findings are due to coconut oil, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Low birth weight. It is unclear if oral coconut oil is beneficial for improving growth in infants with very low birth weight. Details: One small, open-label clinical trial in very low birth weight infants shows that giving coconut oil 1 mL four times daily in expressed breast milk until 40 weeks corrected age does not increase growth when compared with breast milk alone. The addition of coconut oil also has no effect on head circumference, length, weight, or body fat improvements (101875).
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral coconut oil is beneficial in patients with metabolic syndrome. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that using 30 mL of virgin coconut oil in place of other cooking oils daily for 4 weeks reduces levels of triglycerides, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, and fasting plasma glucose and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels when compared with a usual diet. However, levels of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were increased with coconut oil use. Coconut oil did not alter blood pressure or waist circumference (106494).
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Oral coconut oil has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study in patients with MS shows that taking coconut oil 60 mL in combination with epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) 800 mg daily for 4 months improves functional capacity, increases muscle mass, and reduces symptoms of anxiety and depression by a small amount when compared to baseline (101876,106492). It is unclear if these findings are due to coconut oil, EGCG, or the combination. Additionally, the validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Nipple fissures. It is unclear if topical coconut oil is beneficial for nipple fissures in breastfeeding mothers. Details: Preliminary clinical research in breastfeeding primiparous mothers with nipple fissures shows that applying 0.5 mL of virgin coconut oil to the fissures after breastfeeding three times daily for 14 days improves scores on Storr's fissure scale and on a visual analog pain scale, when compared with applying 3 to 4 drops of breastmilk to the nipples after every breastfeeding session (110407).
• Nocturnal enuresis. It is unclear if topical coconut oil is beneficial in children with primary nocturnal enuresis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children aged 6 to 14 years with primary nocturnal enuresis shows that applying coconut oil, 6 drops to the suprapubic, sacral, and flank areas nightly for 4 weeks reduces the mean frequency of urination at 4 weeks and 8 weeks of follow-up, when compared with baseline. Complete resolution occurred in 24 patients receiving coconut oil, and 17 receiving the paraffin oil control. There was no improvement in 5 on coconut oil, and 14 on paraffin oil (110405). However, the validity of these findings is unclear since blinding was compromised by the different oil odors.
• Obesity. Although some clinical studies suggest that oral coconut oil may modestly reduce body weight or body mass index (BMI), most research is mixed. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking coconut oil in the diet or as a supplement daily decreases body weight, BMI, and fat mass percent by 0.75 kg, 0.28 kg/m², and 0.35%, respectively, when compared to other oils and fats, usually polyunsaturated oils. However, there was no effect on waist circumference or total fat mass, and significant changes did not occur in more than half of the individual studies (107665). These individual studies were generally small, of low to moderate quality, and utilized a wide range of dosing regimens. Doses of coconut oil used in the individual studies ranged from 7-93 mL or 14% to 15% of daily energy intake and included extra-virgin, virgin, bleached and deodorized, hydrogenated, and ordinary sources. Study durations ranged from 4 weeks to 2 years (17938,17942,99102,107665). Virgin coconut oil is associated with reduced hunger and desire to eat in normal weight subjects, but not in obese subjects, when compared with extra virgin olive oil. It is also associated with reduced energy intake at the next meal when compared with olive oil in obese subjects, but not in normal weight subjects (110406).
• Psoriasis. It is unclear if topical coconut oil is beneficial in patients with psoriasis. Details: One small clinical study in patients with psoriasis shows that applying coconut oil to the skin before treatment with ultraviolet B (UVB) or psoralen and ultraviolet A (PUVA) phototherapy does not seem to improve the clearance of psoriasis (12356). More evidence is needed to rate coconut oil for these uses.

(Read more about COCONUT OIL)

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Alzheimer disease. Lecithin does not improve daily functioning in patients with Alzheimer disease. Details: In patients with Alzheimer disease, taking various types of lecithin, 1.2-45 grams daily for up to 6 months, alone or in combination with various conventional medications, does not improve cognitive function or other measures of disease progression (5149,5151,5152,5156,14817,14823,14825,14837,14838).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral lecithin can slow age-related cognitive decline. Details: A small clinical crossover study in healthy adults aged 64 years and older shows that taking lecithin 26 grams orally daily, alone or in combination with physostigmine, for 5 weeks does not seem to improve memory when compared with placebo (19204).
• Anxiety. Although there is interest in using oral lecithin for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lecithin for this condition.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Although there is interest in using oral lecithin for atopic dermatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lecithin for this condition.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A clinical study in six patients with mania shows that taking lecithin 10 mg three times daily improves symptoms of delusions, incoherent speech, and hallucinations when compared with placebo (14839).
• Dry skin. Although there is interest in using topical lecithin for dry skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lecithin for this condition.
• Friedreich ataxia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral lecithin is not beneficial in people with Friedreich ataxia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking lecithin 25 grams orally daily for 1 month does not have any benefit in people with Friedreich ataxia (59298). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking lecithin for a longer period of 6 months also does not improve performance (19211).
• Hyperlipidemia. Although lecithin may lower cholesterol in healthy people, it does not seem to improve cholesterol levels in people with hyperlipidemia. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking lecithin 20-30 grams daily for up to 11 months decreases cholesterol in healthy people (5147,14820). However, other clinical research shows that lecithin has no effect on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or total cholesterol levels in people with hyperlipidemia (5148,14820).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial in patients with Parkinson disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with Parkinson disease shows that taking lecithin 32 grams daily for 8 weeks does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (19212).
• Postoperative pain. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial for reducing postoperative pain. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking lecithin 20 grams prior to surgery increases choline levels, but does not reduce postoperative pain after gynecological surgery, when compared with placebo (91231).
• Tardive dyskinesia. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial in patients with tardive dyskinesia. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with tardive dyskinesia shows that taking lecithin orally for 2 months, alone or in combination with lithium, does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (14822,14824).
• TPN-associated hepatic steatosis. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial in patients with hepatic steatosis associated with long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Details: A small clinical study in patients on long-term TPN with low choline levels suggests that taking lecithin 20 grams orally twice daily for 6 weeks reduces the degree of hepatic steatosis, compared with no significant changes in those taking placebo (5140).
• Ulcerative colitis. Oral lecithin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a disease-specific medical food (Profermin, Nordisk Rebalance) containing lecithin, fermented oats, barley malt, and lactobacillus plantarum, as 250 mL twice daily for 24 weeks, decreases disease activity by over 56% when compared with baseline and leads to remission in 46% of patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (91228). Other preliminary clinical research in this population shows that taking Profermin 250 mL twice daily for 8 weeks improves disease activity and remission rate when compared with another medical food (Fresubin Original, Fresenius Kabi) (90271). The effects of lecithin alone are unclear. More evidence is needed to rate lecithin for these uses.

(Read more about LECITHIN)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Familial hypercholesterolemia. Oral plant sterols are beneficial for reducing levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when used in combination with a cholesterol-lowering diet in children and adults with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Details: A meta-analysis of results from clinical research in children and adults with FH shows that taking plant sterols while following a cholesterol-lowering diet reduces total cholesterol by an additional 12 mg/dL and LDL cholesterol by an additional 23 mg/dL when compared with following a cholesterol-lowering diet alone (90743). Individual clinical trials in adults and children 5 years and up show that consuming margarine spreads or yogurt enriched with plant sterol 1.6-2.3 grams daily for 4-26 weeks, sometimes in combination with statin therapy, reduces total cholesterol by up to 11% and LDL cholesterol by up to 14% in patients with FH (90726,90731,35037,35106). However, most clinical research shows that plant sterols do not reduce triglyceride levels or increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels in patients with FH (35037,35106,90743).
• Hypercholesterolemia. Oral plant sterols in doses of 2-3 grams daily are beneficial for reducing levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, but not triglycerides, when used in combination with a cholesterol-lowering diet. Details: Clinical research shows that taking plant sterols, alone or in combination with plant stanols, reduces total and LDL cholesterol levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Taking plant sterols daily while following a cholesterol-lowering diet reduces total cholesterol by about 3% to 8% and LDL cholesterol by about 5% to 15% when compared with dieting alone (5336,5437,7105,65749,90686,90720,90722,90723,90724,90734)(90741,90748,90752,106093). Plant sterols seem to have the most significant cholesterol-lowering effect in people who naturally produce a high amount of cholesterol (90742). When taken along with statin therapy, plant sterols can lower total cholesterol by about 12-22 mg/dL and LDL cholesterol by about 11-16 mg/dL when compared with statin therapy alone (90728,96272). Predictive modeling suggests that the cholesterol reduction from plant sterols can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease over time. In English adults with hypercholesterolemia and no cardiovascular disease, replacing regular spreads with plant sterol -enriched spreads over a 20-year period could potentially prevent 69 cardiovascular events per 10,000 males and 40 events per 10,000 females (98449). Plant sterols, usually as esters, with or without plant stanols, 0.2-9 grams daily for up to one year have been used (5336,5437,5814,7105,14298,90686,90720,35034,90722,90723)(90724,90726,90730,90732,90733,90734,90741,90742,90744,90748)(90752,96272). However, the optimal dosage of plant sterols for reducing LDL cholesterol is about 2-3 grams daily taken with meals (5814,90733,90748). At this dosage, plant sterols seem to work as well as plant stanols but less effectively than taking policosanol 5-40 mg daily (14298,90730). When taken as fortified foods, plant sterols appear to be more effective when taken in dairy products than in breads or cereals (35034). No increased benefit is seen at dosages higher than 2-3 grams daily (90744). In post-menopausal females, a meta-analysis of 6 studies shows that plant sterols are most effective for reducing total and LDL cholesterol in patients with obesity, using a daily dose of plant sterols greater than 2 grams, and duration of treatment greater than 8 weeks (112081). Additionally, some clinical research shows that plant sterols might become less effective after about 2-3 months of treatment (90726). Results from most individual clinical studies show that plant sterols do not reduce triglyceride levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia (65749,90720,90732,96272,106093,112081). However, a meta-analysis of results from 12 clinical studies shows that taking plant sterols 0.8-4 grams daily reduces triglyceride levels by 6% in patients with hypercholesterolemia (90732). This suggests that plant sterols might modestly lower triglyceride levels in some patients, but more research in larger patient populations is needed to confirm this finding. There is also some evidence showing that plant sterols prepared as ester derivatives using fish oil rather than sunflower oil, olive oil, or rapeseed oil can moderately lower triglyceride levels when compared with placebo (90739). However, this benefit is likely due to the triglyceride-lowering activity of fish oil rather than plant sterols. Taking plant sterols does not improve levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (65749,90728,90732,96272,112081).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Coronary heart disease (CHD). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved an authorized health claim for dietary plant sterols, when taken in doses of at least 3.4 grams daily as part of a diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol, for reducing the risk of CHD. Details: In 2010, the US FDA authorized a health claim stating that consuming at least 3.4 grams of plant sterols daily, as part of a diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol, may reduce the risk of heart disease (102365). This health claim is based on evidence showing that plant sterols can lower cholesterol levels. However, there is currently no evidence directly linking dietary intake of plant sterols with a reduced risk for developing CHD.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Cancer. It is unclear if dietary plant sterols are beneficial for cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that the highest intake of plant sterols is associated with a 37% reduced risk of cancer when compared with the lowest intake (106084).
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if dietary plant sterols are beneficial for colorectal cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that dietary intake of specific plant sterols, including campesterol, stigmasterol, or beta-sitosterol, is not associated with risk of developing colon cancer. Dietary intake of plant sterols also does not affect the risk of rectal cancer in females; however, in males, higher dietary intake of the plant sterols campesterol or stigmasterol is associated with an INCREASED risk of rectal cancer (34993).
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if dietary plant sterols influence the outcome of esophageal cancer. Details: In Chinese people with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the mortality rate does not seem to differ between those with the lowest versus the highest intake of dietary plant sterols, measured five years before diagnosis (112082).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if dietary plant sterols are beneficial for gastric cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that consuming at least 82.5 mg of plant sterols daily as part of the diet is associated with moderately lower odds of developing gastric cancer when compared to those who consume less than 45.5 mg daily (34984).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). Although there is interest in using oral plant sterols for prediabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of plant sterols for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral plant sterols are beneficial for metabolic syndrome; the available research is conflicting. Details: One clinical study shows that taking yogurt mini-drinks providing plant sterols 2 grams twice daily for 8 weeks reduces total cholesterol by about 16%, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by about 20%, and triglyceride levels by about 19% when compared with control yogurt drinks without plant sterols (90749). However, results from a much smaller study in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that taking plant sterols 2 grams daily for 8 weeks in breakfast cereal and margarine does not improve plasma lipids or other cardiovascular markers when compared with placebo foods (90745). Reasons for the discrepancy are not clear but might relate to the dose or formulation of plant sterol, or the lipid levels of the patients at baseline.
• Myocardial infarction (MI). It is unclear if dietary plant sterols are beneficial for MI prevention. Details: Population research has found that consuming approximately 340 mg of plant sterols daily is associated with a 29% lower risk of first myocardial infarction in males when compared with those who consume about 150 mg daily. However, dietary plant sterol intake is not associated with a reduced risk of first myocardial infarction in females (90740).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral plant sterols are beneficial for obesity. Details: In Chinese adults, higher dietary intakes of beta-sitosterol, stigmasterol, and total plant sterols are inversely related to the risk of being overweight. The risk of central obesity is linked to stigmasterol intake in females, and to beta-sitosterol intake in males (112083). Preliminary clinical research in obese individuals shows that consuming rice bran snack bars fortified with a mixture of plant sterols and stanols 1.8 grams daily for 8 weeks while following a reduced calorie diet does not increase weight loss, reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or improve blood glucose control when compared to dieting and consuming unfortified rice bran snack bars. However, the plant sterol-enriched rice bran snacks appear to decrease total cholesterol by about 10% more than unfortified rice bran snacks (90738). More evidence is needed to rate plant sterols for these uses.

(Read more about PLANT STEROLS)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Wrinkled skin. Preliminary clinical research in adult women with sagging facial skin shows that application of a topical serum containing 1% vanilla extract and 1.5% bakuchiol extract to the face and neck twice daily for 56 days improves skin firmness and jowl ptosis when compared with baseline. It is unclear if this effect is due to vanilla extract, bakuchiol extract, or the combination. Also, the validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group (104752). More evidence is needed to rate vanilla for this use.

(Read more about VANILLA)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately (13161,14306,14307,14308,15655,15752,17187,92271,92274,103247)(103250,108898). However, cocoa naturally contains caffeine, and caffeine may be unsafe when used orally in doses of more than 400 mg daily (11733,98806). While most cocoa products contain only small amounts of caffeine (about 2-35 mg per serving) (2708,3900), one cup of unsweetened, dry cocoa powder can contain up to 198 mg of caffeine (100515). To be on the safe side, cocoa should be used in amounts that provide less than 400 mg of caffeine daily. Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine naturally found in ingredients such as cocoa does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product. Cocoa and dark chocolate products worldwide also contain heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. In the US, one ounce (approximately 28 grams) of most commercially available dark chocolate products tested contained levels of lead and/or cadmium above the maximum allowable dose level for California, with cadmium levels generally increasing with the percentage of cocoa (109847,109848,109849). Advise patients to consume cocoa in moderation. ...when used topically. Cocoa butter is used extensively as a base for ointments and suppositories and is generally considered safe (11).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when dark chocolate is used orally. Cocoa and dark chocolate products worldwide contain heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. In the US, one ounce (approximately 28 grams) of most commercially available dark chocolate products tested contained levels of lead and/or cadmium above the maximum allowable dose level for California, with cadmium levels generally increasing with the percentage of cocoa (109847,109848,109849). Children are at increased risk of adverse effects from intake of lead and/or cadmium. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of other chocolate-based products that typically contain smaller quantities of cocoa.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally in moderate amounts. However, due to the caffeine content of cocoa preparations, intake should be closely monitored during pregnancy to ensure moderate consumption. Fetal blood concentrations of caffeine approximate maternal concentrations (4260). Some research has found that intrauterine exposure to even modest amounts of caffeine, based on maternal blood levels during the first trimester, is associated with a shorter stature in children ages 4-8 years (109846). While many cocoa products contain only small amounts of caffeine (about 2-35 mg per serving) (2708,3900), unsweetened, dry cocoa powder can contain up to 198 mg of caffeine per cup (100515). According to a review by Health Canada, and a subsequent large meta-analysis conducted in the US, doses of up to 300 mg daily can be consumed during pregnancy without an increased risk of spontaneous abortion, still birth, preterm birth, fetal growth retardation, or congenital malformations (11733,98806). To be on the safe side, cocoa should be used in amounts that provide less than 300 mg of caffeine daily. Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine found in ingredients such as cocoa, which naturally contains caffeine, does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in large amounts. Caffeine found in cocoa crosses the placenta producing fetal blood concentrations similar to maternal levels (4260). Consumption of caffeine in amounts over 300 mg daily is associated with a significantly increased risk of miscarriage in some studies (16014,98806). Additionally, high intake of caffeine during pregnancy have been associated with premature delivery, low birth weight, and loss of the fetus (6). While many cocoa products contain only small amounts of caffeine (about 2-35 mg per serving) (2708,3900), unsweetened, dry cocoa powder can contain up to 198 mg of caffeine per cup (100515). To be on the safe side, cocoa should be used in amounts that provide less than 300 mg of caffeine daily (2708). Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine found in ingredients such as cocoa, which naturally contains caffeine, does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product. Cocoa and dark chocolate products worldwide also contain heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. In the US, one ounce (approximately 28 grams) of most commercially available dark chocolate products tested contained levels of lead and/or cadmium above the maximum allowable dose level for California, with cadmium levels generally increasing with the percentage of cocoa (109847,109848,109849). Large doses or excessive intake of cocoa should be avoided during pregnancy.

LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used in moderate amounts or in amounts commonly found in foods. Due to the caffeine content of cocoa preparations, intake should be closely monitored while breastfeeding. During lactation, breast milk concentrations of caffeine are thought to be approximately 50% of serum concentrations. Moderate consumption of cocoa would likely result in very small amounts of caffeine exposure to a nursing infant (6). Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine found in ingredients such as cocoa, which naturally contains caffeine, does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in large amounts. Consumption of excess chocolate (16 oz per day) may cause irritability and increased bowel activity in the infant (6026). Cocoa and dark chocolate products worldwide also contain heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. In the US, one ounce (approximately 28 grams) of most commercially available dark chocolate products tested contained levels of lead and/or cadmium above the maximum allowable dose level for California, with cadmium levels generally increasing with the percentage of cocoa (109847,109848,109849). Large doses or excessive intake of cocoa should be avoided during lactation.

(Read more about COCOA)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in food amounts. Coconut oil can be safely consumed as a component of the diet (12361,17935,94452,106494). However, coconut oil should not be considered a healthy alternative to other saturated fats (94453,94643). Coconut oil contains more saturated fat than animal based fats, including lard and butter (94643). Therefore, like all saturated fats, coconut oil should be used in moderation (94453,94643). ...when used topically and appropriately. Commercial products containing coconut oil in concentrations up to 100% have been used with apparent safety. However, most research has used commercial products with concentrations up to 70% (12356,17936,17941).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts, short-term. Taking coconut oil up to 10 mL orally two or three times daily for up to 12 weeks has been used with apparent safety in clinical research (17938,17942,90615,106493).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used topically and appropriately, short-term. Coconut oil has been used with apparent safety in children and neonates for about one month (13483,17937,90614,90616,96204,101873). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of coconut oil when taken orally in children.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of using coconut oil in medicinal amounts during pregnancy or lactation. Coconut oil ingestion increases the amount of lauric acid in breast milk within 10 hours. This indicates that fatty acids from coconut oil are rapidly transferred into human breast milk following oral intake (14086). The impact of this increase in lauric acid on nursing infants is not known.

(Read more about COCONUT OIL)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Lecithin has Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) status in the US (2619,105544). ...when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts. Lecithin has been used safely in doses of up to 30 grams daily for up to 6 weeks (5140,5149,5152,5156,14817,14822,14838,19212). ...when used topically (4914).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in food amounts. Lecithin has Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) status in the US (105544). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of medicinal amounts of lecithin during pregnancy or lactation; avoid using.

(Read more about LECITHIN)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Plant sterols have been safely used in studies lasting up to one year (35022,35037,90724,90726,90730,90732,90733,90734,90739,90742). Due to the unknown safety of plant sterol oxidation products, and the known production of these oxidation products during the heating of foods (106092), there is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of heat-treated foods containing added plant sterols.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Plant sterols have been safely used in children in studies lasting for up to 6 months (35037,90722,90723,90726,90731,35106). PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about PLANT STEROLS)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Vanilla has Generally Recognized Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of vanilla when used orally or topically in medicinal amounts.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (4912). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of vanilla when used in amounts in excess of that found in foods; avoid using.

(Read more about VANILLA)

ACE INHIBITORS (ACEIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking cocoa with ACEIs might increase the risk of adverse effects.  Details Human research shows that dark chocolate can inhibit ACE (42112). Additionally, prolonged angioedema in an elderly patient on an ACE inhibitor was precipitated with intake of diabetic chocolate (42049).

ADENOSINE (Adenocard) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cocoa might decrease the vasodilatory effects of adenosine and interfere with its use prior to stress testing.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine is a competitive inhibitor of adenosine at the cellular level. However, caffeine does not seem to affect supplemental adenosine because high interstitial levels of adenosine overcome the antagonistic effects of caffeine. It is recommended that methylxanthines and methylxanthine-containing products be stopped 24 hours prior to pharmacological stress tests. However, methylxanthines appear more likely to interfere with dipyridamole than adenosine-induced stress testing (11771).

ALCOHOL (Ethanol) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Alcohol reduces caffeine metabolism. Concomitant use of alcohol can increase caffeine serum concentrations and the risk of caffeine adverse effects (6370).

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa may increase the risk of bleeding if used with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.  Details Clinical research shows that intake of cocoa can inhibit platelet adhesion, aggregation, and activity (6085,17076,41928,41948,41957,41958,41995,42014,42070,42145)(111526) and increase aspirin-induced bleeding time (23800). For patients on dual antiplatelet therapy, cocoa may enhance the inhibitory effect of clopidogrel, but not aspirin, on platelet aggregation (111526).

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking cocoa with antihypertensive drugs might increase the risk of hypotension.  Details Clinical research shows that cocoa can modestly decrease blood pressure in hypertensive and normotensive patients (13166,14306,15655,15752,17187,42059,42092,42107,42137,42143)(42169,103249,109446).

BETA-ADRENERGIC AGONISTS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, large amounts of cocoa might increase the cardiac inotropic effects of beta-agonists.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Theoretically, large amounts of caffeine might increase cardiac inotropic effects of beta-agonists (15). A case of atrial fibrillation associated with consumption of large quantities of chocolate in a patient with chronic albuterol inhalation abuse has also been reported (42075).

CIMETIDINE (Tagamet) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the effects and adverse effects of caffeine in cocoa.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Cimetidine decreases caffeine clearance by 30% to 50% (15,506).

CONTRACEPTIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the effects and adverse effects of caffeine found in cocoa.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Oral contraceptives decrease the rate of caffeine clearance by 40% to 65% (2714,11737).

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) INHIBITORS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) (3941,5051,11741,23557,23573,23580,24958,24959,24960,24962), (24964,24965,24967,24968,24969,24971,38081,48603). Theoretically, drugs that inhibit CYP1A2 may decrease the clearance rate of caffeine from cocoa and increase caffeine levels.

DIPYRIDAMOLE (Persantine) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cocoa might decrease the vasodilatory effects of dipyridamole and interfere with its use prior to stress testing.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine may inhibit dipyridamole-induced vasodilation (11770,11772). It is recommended that methylxanthines and methylxanthine-containing products be stopped 24 hours prior to pharmacological stress tests (11770). Methylxanthines appear more likely to interfere with dipyridamole than adenosine-induced stress testing (11771).

DISULFIRAM (Antabuse) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, disulfiram might increase the risk of adverse effects from caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. In human research, disulfiram decreases the rate of caffeine clearance (11840).

DIURETIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, using cocoa with diuretic drugs might increase the risk of hypokalemia.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. In excessive amounts, caffeine can reduce potassium levels due to stimulation of the sodium-potassium pump (23579,37905,37953,38003,38034). Diuretics can also cause lower potassium levels.

EPHEDRINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk for stimulant adverse effects.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. There is evidence that using ephedrine with caffeine might increase the risk of serious life-threatening or debilitating adverse effects such as hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, seizures, and death (1275,6486,10307).

ESTROGENS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, estrogens might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Estrogen inhibits caffeine metabolism (2714).

FLUCONAZOLE (Diflucan) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, fluconazole might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Fluconazole decreases caffeine clearance by approximately 25% (11022).

FLUTAMIDE (Eulexin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa might increase the levels and adverse effects of flutamide.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. In vitro evidence suggests that caffeine can inhibit the metabolism of flutamide (23553).

FLUVOXAMINE (Luvox) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, fluvoxamine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Fluvoxamine reduces caffeine metabolism (6370).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, abrupt cocoa withdrawal might increase the levels and adverse effects of lithium.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. There are two case reports of lithium tremor that worsened upon abrupt coffee withdrawal (609,610).

METHOXSALEN (Oxsoralen) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, methoxsalen might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Methoxsalen can reduce caffeine metabolism (23572).

METMORPHIN (Glucophage) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, metformin might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that metformin can reduce caffeine metabolism (23571).

MEXILETINE (Mexitil) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, mexiletine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Mexiletine can decrease caffeine elimination by 50% (1260,11741). Concomitant use might increase the effects and adverse effects of caffeine in cocoa.

MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITORS (MAOIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk of a hypertensive crisis.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Large amounts of caffeine with MAOIs might precipitate a hypertensive crisis (15).

NICOTINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk of hypertension.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Concomitant use of caffeine and nicotine has been shown to have additive cardiovascular effects, including increased heart rate and blood pressure. Blood pressure was increased by 10.8/12.4 mmHg when the agents were used concomitantly (36549).

PENTOBARBITAL (Nembutal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cocoa might decrease the effects of pentobarbital.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine might negate the hypnotic effects of pentobarbital (13742).

PHENOBARBITAL (Luminal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa might reduce the effects of phenobarbital and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of phenobarbital (23558,23559,23561). The exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

PHENOTHIAZINES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, phenothiazines might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Phenothiazines can reduce the metabolism of caffeine by inhibiting cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) (23573,23574).

PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, phenylpropanolamine might increase the risk of hypertension, as well as the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Concomitant use of phenylpropanolamine and caffeine might cause an additive increase in blood pressure (11738). Phenylpropanolamine also seems to increase caffeine serum levels (13743).

PHENYTOIN (Dilantin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa might reduce the effects of phenytoin and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of phenytoin (23559,23561). The effect does not seem to be related to the seizure threshold-lowering effects of caffeine. However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, quinolone antibiotics might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Quinolones (also referred to as fluoroquinolones) decrease caffeine clearance (606,607,608).

RILUZOLE (Rilutek) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the levels and adverse effects of both caffeine and riluzole.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine and riluzole are both metabolized by cytochrome P450 1A2, and concomitant use might reduce metabolism of one or both agents (11739).

STIMULANT DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, concomitant use might increase stimulant adverse effects.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Concomitant use might increase the risk of stimulant adverse effects (11832).

TERBINAFINE (Lamisil) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, terbinafine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Terbinafine decreases the rate of caffeine clearance (11740).

THEOPHYLLINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cocoa might increase the levels and adverse effects of theophylline.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Large amounts of caffeine might inhibit theophylline metabolism (11741). Caffeine decreases theophylline clearance 23% to 29% (506).

TIAGABINE (Gabitril) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa tea might increase the levels and adverse effects of tiagabine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that chronic caffeine administration can increase the serum concentrations of tiagabine. However, concomitant use does not seem to reduce the antiepileptic effects of tiagabine (23561).

TICLOPIDINE (Ticlid) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, ticlopidine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. In vitro evidence suggests that ticlopidine can inhibit caffeine metabolism (23557). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

VALPROATE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa might reduce the effects of valproate and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of valproate (23558,23559,23561,37882). However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, verapamil might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Verapamil increases plasma caffeine concentrations by 25% (11741).

(Read more about COCOA)

(Read more about COCONUT OIL)

(Read more about LECITHIN)

(Read more about PLANT STEROLS)

(Read more about VANILLA)

General ...Orally and topically, cocoa is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Borborygmi, constipation, diuresis, gastrointestinal discomfort, headaches, and nausea.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Tachycardia.

Cardiovascular ...Some cases of increased heart rate have been reported with oral cocoa use (13161,42132).

Dermatologic ...In some cases, when taken orally, cocoa can cause allergic skin reactions (13161). Topically, cocoa butter has occasionally caused a rash. In animals, it has been shown to block pores and cause acne; however, this has not been found in humans (11).

Gastrointestinal ...In human trials, chocolate consumption was associated with a higher incidence of flatulence, irritable bowel syndrome, upset stomach, gastric upset, borborygmi (a gurgling noise made by fluid or gas in the intestines), bloating, nausea, vomiting, and constipation or obstipation (41986,42221,41921,1374,42220,1373,42099,42097,42156,42123,18229,42169,42111). Chocolate consumption has been implicated as a provoking factor in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (41974,42005,41946,1374). Unpalatability has been reported (42079,42169). Consumption of chocolate and other sweet foods may lead to increased dental caries (42129,42030).

Genitourinary ...In some cases, when taken orally, cocoa can cause increased urination (13161).

Neurologic/CNS ...In some cases, when taken orally, cocoa can cause shakiness and might trigger migraine and other headaches (13161,42169,92271).

Other ...Due to the high sugar and caloric content of chocolate, there is concern about weight gain in people who consume large amounts of chocolate (17187).

(Read more about COCOA)

General ...Orally and topically, coconut oil is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Increased cholesterol levels.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
All routes of administration: Allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, in sensitive individuals.

Cardiovascular ...Due to its high saturated fat content, there has been some speculation that consuming coconut oil might increase cholesterol levels and the risk of cardiovascular disease. Several population and clinical studies have found that consuming coconut oil increases total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in some patients (12361,14407,17935,17940,94451,94452,99103,101877,101879,106489,106494). In patients with normal to high cholesterol levels, consuming a daily diet providing 30% to 36% of calories from fat, of which 46% to 66% is from coconut oil, for 4-12 weeks increases total cholesterol by about 12-15 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by about 9-12 mg/dL, and HDL cholesterol by 3-6 mg/dL when compared to a diet containing vegetable oils, especially those rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (17935,94451,94452,101877,106489). In some cases, these cholesterol effects are similar to those seen in patients consuming a similar diet containing butter or beef fat (12361,17935,94451,99103,101879). Despite the potential effects of coconut oil on cholesterol levels, population research has not found an association with coconut oil consumption and risk of adverse cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction or angina (14407,96205). Advise patients not to rely on coconut oil as a "healthy" alternative to other saturated fats.

Dermatologic ...In one case report, a 6-year-old child developed urticaria and hives from applying coconut oil to the skin. The child had been exposed to coconut oil consistently since 2 weeks of age, indicating sensitization over the course of regular exposure (95806). In clinical research, one patient reported localized pruritus immediately after applying a combination of coconut oil, anise oil, and ylang ylang (13483). It is unclear if this event was due to coconut oil, other ingredients, or the combination. Also, it is possible that this was an idiosyncratic event.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, diarrhea and gastroenteritis have been reported rarely (101877).

Hepatic ...Orally, taking virgin coconut oil in the diet for 28 days modestly increased levels of liver enzymes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, it is unclear if this was due to the coconut oil or to the illness (107664).

Immunologic ...Several cases of allergic reactions have been reported for patients who consumed coconut fruit. In some of the cases, the patients were previously diagnosed with sensitivity to other tree nuts, including peanuts, so cross-sensitivity is suspected. In a separate case report, a 17-year-old male was found to be sensitized to both coconut and buckwheat, indicating a possible cross-sensitivity between the two allergens (95808). In other cases, the patients did not show sensitivity to any other allergens, so the patients were considered to have a single allergy to coconut fruit (12359,12360).
Because coconut oil is derived from coconut fruit, ingestion of coconut oil may theoretically cause allergic reactions in patients with confirmed allergy to coconut fruit. In one case report, a 6-year-old child who had previously experienced urticaria and hives from applying coconut oil to the skin experienced throat swelling and anaphylaxis after eating food containing coconut, indicating a sensitivity to both the fruit and the oil via both topical application and ingestion (95806). However, allergic reactions to coconut appear to occur significantly less often than allergies to other food items such as wheat, milk, soy, or peanut (14408).

(Read more about COCONUT OIL)

General ...Orally, lecithin is well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, diarrhea, fullness, and nausea.

Dermatologic ...Orally, lecithin can cause allergic skin reactions in people with egg or soy allergies (15705).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, lecithin may cause abdominal pain, diarrhea, fullness, and nausea (5140,6243,14817,14822,14838,19204,59281).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, lecithin caused CNS complaints and agitation in one patient in a clinical trial (59261).

(Read more about LECITHIN)

General ...Orally, plant sterols are generally well tolerated.

Dermatologic ...Acute dermatitis has been reported in a case report of a 51-year-old female who used a pharmacy-brand plant sterol supplement to lower cholesterol levels. The rash was widespread with lesions on the hands and feet and a red and swollen face. The patient was treated orally with prednisolone and topically with emollients for 2 weeks (90737). It is not entirely clear if this adverse effect was due to the plant sterol supplement or another contributing factor.

Endocrine ...Peripheral precocious puberty has been described in a 20-month-old boy who ingested about 15 grams daily of a chicken essence product containing the plant sterol avenasterol, also known as clerosterol or chondrillasterol. Signs and symptoms included elevated estradiol and testosterone levels, acne, hairiness, increased penis size, hoarse voice, and increased growth rate. These effects were reversed when the product was stopped (112084).

Gastrointestinal ...Abdominal discomfort has occurred in one child in a clinical trial of oral plant sterols (35106). Because plant sterols decrease cholesterol absorption in the gut, there is concern that they might produce some gastrointestinal symptoms like diarrhea and excess amounts of fat in the stool (steatorrhea), although these adverse effects have not been reported in clinical research.

(Read more about PLANT STEROLS)

General ...Orally, vanilla is well tolerated when used in amounts commonly found in foods (4912). Orally and topically, vanilla has been associated with allergic responses including contact dermatitis. Workers preparing vanilla have reported headache, dermatitis, and insomnia, which is historically characterized as "occupational vanillism" (100502).

Dermatologic ...Workers preparing vanilla have reported dermatitis, associated with what is historically characterized as "occupational vanillism" (100502).

Immunologic ...Orally, vanilla resulted in eczematous reactions in children that had been diagnosed with atopic dermatitis (81981). Topically, vanilla has been shown to cause contact dermatitis when used as a lip salve (81988).

Neurologic/CNS ...Workers preparing vanilla have reported headache and insomnia, associated with what is historically characterized as "occupational vanillism" (100502).

(Read more about VANILLA)