P-5-P 50 mg by The Vitamin Shoppe

EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Oral calcium carbonate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an antacid. Details: Taking calcium carbonate orally as an antacid is effective for treating dyspepsia (1843). Calcium carbonate has FDA approval as an antacid.
• Hyperkalemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities. Details: Administering calcium gluconate intravenously can reverse electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias induced by hyperkalemia (12946). Intravenous calcium gluconate is FDA-approved for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities.
• Hypocalcemia. Oral calcium treats and prevents hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium is used to treat severe hypocalcemia. Details: Taking calcium orally is effective for treating and preventing hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate, acetate, gluceptate, or chloride is effective for severe hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany (12928).
• Kidney failure. Oral calcium carbonate or calcium acetate is used as a phosphate binder during kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium carbonate or calcium acetate orally is effective as a phosphate binder. Calcium acetate (PhosLo) appears to control hyperphosphatemia better than sevelamer (Renagel) (12943,12944,38990). Calcium citrate is not recommended for this purpose because it increases aluminum absorption and does not bind phosphate as efficiently as calcium acetate or calcium carbonate (21631). Some clinical research also shows that taking calcium orally reduces blood pressure in patients with kidney failure (975).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral calcium in combination with vitamin D prevents bone density loss that occurs during long-term treatment with corticosteroids. Details: Taking calcium in combination with vitamin D as adjunctive therapy seems to be effective for reducing bone mineral density loss in people using corticosteroids long-term (982,1046,1830,1831,1832,4462,4463,4464,4465,4466)(4467,12945,38493). One specific product used in clinical research is Oscal (Marion Merrel Dow Inc.), which contains elemental calcium 500 mg per tablet plus vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (982). Another product used is Oscal 250 + D (SmithKline Beecham Healthcare), which contains elemental calcium 250 mg and vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (1046).
• Hyperparathyroidism. Oral calcium reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium orally reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with kidney failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism (1827,1828,1829,39174,39425). In elderly women, the combination of calcium and vitamin D reverses secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces hip fracture risk (8818). Also, population research suggests increased calcium intake from the diet and supplements reduces the risk of primary hyperparathyroidism in women. Supplemental intakes of at least 500 mg/day and dietary intakes of approximately 1100 mg/day are considered to be protective (91353).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate calcium intake, from the diet and/or supplements, is recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate calcium intake in line with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) by age, along with adequate vitamin D intake, for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake when adequate dietary intake is not feasible (109425). In the US and Canada, foods containing at least 200 mg calcium with less phosphorous content than calcium can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate calcium intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (11940,102148). However, calcium supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Also, calcium supplements do not seem to be effective for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) during lactation (988), in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation (1817), or in patients who have had renal transplantation (4823,38736,38871). Maximal bone growth occurs in the teenage years, and then BMD in females remains relatively constant until age 30-40. After age 40, bone loss typically occurs at rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. In males, this occurs several decades later. Bone loss is more pronounced if dietary calcium intake is below the RDA, which is the case for many Americans (2571,2578). One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy children 7-14 years old shows that fortifying food with calcium 250-1000 mg daily for up to 24 months modestly improves femoral neck BMD, but not hip or spine BMD. However, the included trials did not supplement vitamin D (107232). During the 5 years immediately after menopause, calcium supplementation has very little effect on bone loss (2569,2570,2575,2576). The rapid loss of estrogen causes a high bone resorption rate, which increases serum calcium levels and therefore decreases intestinal absorption of calcium (2570). After this period, the typical rate of bone loss is 2% per year (2572,2576). Taking calcium 1000-1600 mg daily as carbonate, citrate, lactate gluconate, or citrate malate salt decreases this rate by 0.25% to 1% annually (977,979,981,2569,2571,2572,2575,2576,2578,6850)(38978,38980,39064). The greatest reductions (1% or more) are seen in the first 1-2 years of supplementation when bone remodeling foci can be filled (2569,2576). After this period, the differences in rate of loss between supplemented and non-supplemented females are closer to 0.25% per year (2569,2577). A meta-analysis of clinical evidence suggests that there is no additional benefit after 4 years (38980). Small clinical studies have found that continuous calcium supplementation at an average daily dose of 1050 mg, started after menopause and continued for 1.5-4 years, may reduce fracture rates by 26% when compared with no calcium supplementation. The largest of these studies was conducted in nursing home residents who also received daily vitamin D; the benefits of calcium, specifically, are unclear (39386). Some research also suggests that calcium and vitamin D improves primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in some older individuals with osteoporosis, particularly the elderly and those who are no longer community dwelling (12930,38875,38849,39026,109471). However, not all research is positive. One large clinical trial in elderly adults with a low-trauma fracture show that taking calcium 1000 mg daily with or without vitamin D 800 IU daily for 2-7 years does not reduce the risk of a second fracture when compared with placebo (13073). Another clinical study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 800 IU daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (less than 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). Also, some exploratory research suggests that supplements may need to be continued indefinitely; in adults over 68 years of age, any effects of 2 years of calcium supplements on BMD appear to be lost within 2 years after discontinuing supplements (6853). Calcium has additive effects when used with other agents such as vitamin D, estrogens, or calcitonin. Whereas calcium alone generally reduces or prevents loss of BMD, combination with other agents can produce small increases in BMD ranging from 0.3% to 3.3% depending on the combination and dosages used (978,980,1836,2570,2571,2572,2576). However, one meta-analysis in healthy adults shows that fortifying foods with calcium 250-1000 mg daily, in conjunction with vitamin D supplementation, for up to 24 months does not improve BMD when compared with control (107232). The full potential of osteoporosis treatments cannot be realized without adequate calcium intake (2569,2570,2571,2572). Advise patients taking agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene (Evista) to ensure that their daily calcium intake meets the RDA. Use supplements if necessary. The usefulness of calcium in preventing osteoporosis in males is not as well-studied. Some observational research has found that calcium 870 mg daily is not associated with changes in BMD and bone loss in males (97201). However, clinical evidence suggests that taking calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years might improve trabecular or cortical bone mass by 2% to 4% (980,8827,8873). Dietary supplementation with calcium and vitamin D seems to moderately reduce bone loss measured in the femoral neck, spine, and total body, and seems to reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in older patients with osteopenia or low BMD (980).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Adequate calcium intake seems to prevent symptoms of PMS. Details: There seems to be a link between low dietary calcium intake and symptoms of PMS (2004,6847,39007). Taking calcium 1000-1336 mg daily seems to significantly reduce depressed mood, water retention, and pain, especially if daily calcium intake is inadequate (1822,1823,1824,2004,95821). Calcium carbonate 1200 mg daily seems to decrease PMS symptom scores by about 18% when compared with placebo (1822). Increasing dietary calcium intake is also associated with a decreased risk of developing PMS. Consuming an average of 1283 mg of calcium per day from foods is associated with about a 30% lower risk of developing PMS compared with consuming an average of 529 mg daily (13094); however, taking calcium supplements does not appear to be associated with the risk of developing PMS.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Oral calcium seems to be beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer, especially in those with adequate vitamin D levels and normal body mass index (BMI). Details: Population studies have found that increased intake of dietary or supplemental calcium is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas (1047,8820,12120,38951,98898,98899). Clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research also show that taking calcium supplements 1.2-2 grams daily for up to 4 years can reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence by up to 29% (970,12118,12950,15267,34596,38718,39042,95817). However, not all research has been positive. Some meta-analyses of clinical research or observational studies suggest that taking calcium does not reduce the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer (34596,39042,39349). Other contradictory research suggests that postmenopausal females who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290); however, this finding may not be reliable due to the high baseline intake of calcium in study participants. The reason for these conflicting findings is not entirely clear. Vitamin D might be an important factor. People with lower than average vitamin D levels do not seem to get any benefit from calcium supplements (12118). Also, one meta-analysis of previous trials suggests that taking calcium 1200 mg daily reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas in people with a normal BMI, but not in those who are overweight or obese (99715). Despite this conflicting evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2005 stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence to support this claim (102366).
• Fetal bone mineralization. If calcium intakes are low during pregnancy, oral calcium seems to be beneficial for increasing fetal bone density. Details: With low dietary calcium intake (less than 562 mg elemental calcium daily) during pregnancy, calcium supplementation increases fetal bone mineralization and density. However, calcium supplementation does not offer any additional benefit if calcium intakes are adequate (3263,3264).
• Hypertension. Oral calcium seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount in adults with or without hypertension. However, it is unclear if this reduction is clinically significant. Details: Many clinical trials and observational studies, including a meta-analysis of 18 high-quality clinical trials, show that intake of calcium supplements or dietary calcium modestly reduces systolic blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension, usually around 1-2 mmHg. Calcium seems to be more effective for certain subpopulations of patients, such as those who are salt-sensitive or have low baseline dietary calcium intake (945,972,974,976,984,1818,1819,1820,1821,6852)(13138,14406,38803,39063,39094,39221,113920,113925). However, a large-scale clinical trial in postmenopausal females shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg daily does not lower blood pressure or reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials shows that taking calcium in combination with vitamin D for up to 7 years has no effect on blood pressure (98861). The validity of this finding is limited by the poor methodological quality of the included studies. Some observational research suggests that calcium can reduce the risk for hypertension. Population research in females aged 45 years and older suggests that higher intake of calcium from both diet and supplemental sources is linked to a lower risk of developing hypertension when compared to lower calcium intake (14265). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension. However, the FDA has concluded that this claim is based on supporting, rather than conclusive, evidence (102367). Research evaluating the effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on the child's blood pressure has yielded conflicting findings. A systematic review of 2 clinical studies and 3 observational studies found that calcium intake during pregnancy is associated with a 1-2 mmHg reduction in the systolic blood pressure of the offspring between the ages of 1-7 years (38852). However, a separate meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies shows that calcium intake during pregnancy does not reduce systolic or diastolic blood pressure in the offspring (113923).
• Osteomalacia. Oral calcium seems to reverse osteomalacia caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Osteomalacia is commonly caused by vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to osteomalacia in children and adults. Calcium supplementation can reverse osteomalacia caused by calcium deficiency. Along with appropriate vitamin D supplementation, individuals at risk of osteomalacia need sufficient calcium intake (94819).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral calcium seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia, especially in high-risk individuals and those with low baseline dietary calcium intake. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (971,38756), most clinical research shows that taking calcium orally 1-2 grams daily reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia (973,1833,8828,39043,39319,39426,97348,113919). A large clinical trial of 11,000 pregnant individuals in India and Tanzania shows that supplementation with 500 mg daily is similarly effective to 1500 mg daily (113908). Multiple meta-analyses which include 16-30 clinical studies have found that varying doses of calcium supplementation reduce the relative risk of pre-eclampsia by 46% to 51% when compared with placebo (97348,113909,113919). One of these meta-analyses found that for every 19 females treated with calcium, one episode of pre-eclampsia would be avoided (97348). Additionally, one of these meta-analyses found that calcium reduces the relative risk of pre-eclampsia by 51%, regardless of whether it is taken at a dose above or below 1000 mg daily (113919). Some research suggests that calcium supplementation may have a greater effect in individuals at high risk of pre-eclampsia or with low baseline dietary calcium intake, and when taken at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation (15029,38497,97348,99714,113919). However, another meta-analysis of 30 clinical studies found a similar benefit of calcium in both high- and low-risk individuals (113919). A separate meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies conducted in China evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy. This combination was associated with an 80% lower relative risk of pre-eclampsia and an 83% lower relative risk of pre-eclampsia with gestational hypertension when compared with routine care (113913). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding the use of calcium supplements to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. However, due to the limited and conflicting research available at that time, the FDA stated that this outcome was highly unlikely (102366). Since then, large, high-quality clinical research has supported this finding. In fact, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released a recommendation to prescribe oral calcium 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancies at high risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary calcium intakes are low (97347).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. Oral calcium may reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Details: A meta-analysis of 17 clinical studies shows that calcium supplementation during pregnancy may reduce the relative risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension by 30% when compared with control (113909). A separate meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies conducted in China, which evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy, shows that this combination reduces the relative risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension by 85% when compared with routine care (113913).
• Rickets. Oral calcium seems to reverse rickets caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Rickets is commonly caused be vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to rickets. Calcium supplementation can reverse rickets caused by calcium deficiency (94819). A small clinical study in children with nutritional rickets shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily for 24 weeks improves radiographically measured rickets caused by calcium deficiency. Rickets seems to improve more rapidly with calcium 1000 mg compared to calcium 500 mg. However, increasing the calcium dose to 2000 mg daily is not more beneficial than calcium 1000 mg daily (98904).
• Tooth retention. Oral calcium with vitamin D seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral calcium, via supplementation or as part of the diet, does not seem to be beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Although some studies disagree (15631,39041,95811,107237,113917), most population research suggests that increased calcium intake is not associated with overall breast cancer risk (15631,16715,98895,107236,107237,113917). However, one meta-analysis of observational studies shows that although higher total calcium intake is not associated with breast cancer risk, higher dietary calcium intake, specifically, may be associated with a slightly reduced risk (113917). Also, some analyses suggest that calcium intake may be associated with the risk for certain breast cancer sub-types. Some subgroup analyses suggest that calcium intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, adults (15631,107237) and that dietary calcium intake may reduce estrogen receptor(ER)-negative breast cancer, but not ER-positive breast cancer (107236). However, most research has not evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation or intake on breast cancer subtypes. The best evidence to date, from a large scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years after menopause does not reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer at the end of the study and 5 years after the end of the intervention (16715,98895).
• Fractures. Although oral calcium prevents fractures in osteoporosis, most evidence shows that calcium does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis discussion for more information on the use of calcium for this purpose. Details: Robust meta-analyses of mostly large, high-quality clinical studies show that calcium supplementation 500-1600 mg daily for 0.5-7 years with or without vitamin D does not reduce total fractures, hip fractures, vertebral fractures, or non-vertebral fractures in older adults without osteoporosis (95822,112486). A large-scale study in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years who were enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) suggests that calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D 400 IU daily for 7 years only modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) and does not significantly reduce fracture risk. This lack of effect may have been due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. In those who were 80% adherent, the combination of calcium plus vitamin D reduced the risk of hip fracture by about 29% (14282). Also, some clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 5 years does not attenuate loss of height after menopause when compared with placebo (95810). Additional meta-analyses of clinical and observational evidence suggest that calcium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, such as hip fractures (38589,38888,98895). Some other research has suggested that calcium in combination with vitamin D reduces fracture risk in older patients without osteoporosis (980,1836,8818,12930,12933,12952,38849,102145,107235); however, this research is confounded by a number of variables, including the presence of hormonal therapy and differing levels of fracture risk at baseline (1836,8818,95822). Conflicting findings on this topic might also be due to genetic differences in patient populations. A population analysis of the WHI study found that, in older females with the lowest genetic susceptibility to low BMD, taking calcium with vitamin D is associated with a reduction in fracture risk. However, in females with a higher genetic susceptibility to low BMD, there is no association between supplementation and fracture risk. This might be because individuals with a lower susceptibility to low BMD are also more responsive to calcium and vitamin D supplementation (97357). As of April 2018, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with vitamin D >400 IU daily along with calcium >1000 mg daily is safe and effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture. USPSTF recommends against supplementing with calcium 1000 mg daily or less along with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal females (95695).
• Obesity. Oral calcium does not seem to improve weight loss in adults or children with overweight or obesity. Details: Observational research has found that adults and children with low calcium intake are more likely to gain weight, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and be overweight or obese when compared to people with high calcium intake (12124,12125,12126,12127,14265). Additional observational research has found that increasing calcium intake is associated with weight loss in females; the results in males have been conflicting (12127,15602,15603). Despite these findings from observational research and a few small clinical studies (12128,15397,14438,98905,113918), most clinical research has found that increased calcium intake does not increase weight loss (12052,13138,15396,15399,38985,39004,97356). A meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies shows that daily dietary and supplemental calcium intake that meets the dietary reference intake (DRI) of 1000 mg or more daily does not increase weight loss in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when compared with intake below the DRI (95813). An older meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials also shows that increased dietary and supplemental calcium intake does not increase weight loss (15605).
• Overall mortality. Oral calcium does not seem to reduce overall mortality. Details: While some population research has found that calcium taken in combination with vitamin D in older females is associated with a lower risk of death (97353), most evidence shows that calcium, with or without vitamin D, has no effect on all-cause mortality (93533,97308,113584).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral calcium does not reduce the risk of developing CVD and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Clinical research shows that calcium does not decrease CVD risk. Several separate meta-analyses of clinical and population research involving over 50,000 patients show that taking calcium 600-1200 mg daily for up to 7 years does not reduce the risk of CVD-related outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or overall mortality (39018,91350,92994,93533,97308,98902,107231,107233). No association was found between total dietary or supplemental calcium intake with or without vitamin D and the risk of CVD or mortality (91350,93533,97308). In fact, some population and clinical research has found that when calcium is used alone or with vitamin D, there is an INCREASED risk of CVD and coronary heart disease (38077,107233). However, other clinical research disagrees (93533). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease by 1.1-1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Intravenous calcium does not prevent nerve pain in patients given oxaliplatin. Oral calcium has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: While pooled analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials suggest that calcium and magnesium infusion decreases the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials shows that the infusion has no effect in preventing neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). Additionally, clinical trials show that administering calcium gluconate 1 gram with magnesium sulfate 1 gram intravenously immediately before, or before and after, the administration of a single oxaliplatin cycle (90005), or over the entire 6-cycle course of oxaliplatin, does not improve symptoms of neurotoxicity when compared with placebo (96474).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral calcium does not prevent MI. When taken in the absence of vitamin D, oral calcium may increase the risk of MI. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of calcium is associated with a decreased risk of MI (91350). However, a 2010 meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking calcium at a dose of at least 500 mg daily is associated with an approximate 30% INCREASE in the risk of MI in patients over the age of 40. According to this analysis, one additional case of MI will occur for every 69 patients that take calcium for 5 years (17482). A more recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of MI by 1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research studied postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233) In contrast, other meta-analyses of clinical research have shown that taking calcium for up to 7 years is NOT associated with an increased risk of MI, including a meta-analysis that only included postmenopausal females (93533,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI in postmenopausal females (93533). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for alcohol use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 800 mg and vitamin D 200 IU orally daily for 14 days modestly reduces alcohol craving scores and withdrawal scores when compared with placebo in adults with alcohol dependence that are undergoing withdrawal. Taking calcium carbonate did not reduce the need for diazepam; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (107234).
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for atherosclerosis. Details: A population study has found that taking calcium 1.2 grams daily for 3 years has no effect on carotid intima thickness or carotid atherosclerosis incidence. A total calcium intake (dietary and supplemental) of at least 1794 mg daily in older females may be associated with a decreased risk of carotid atherosclerosis when compared with a total calcium intake below 1010 mg daily (97351).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the odds of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. Details: A small observational study found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a 52% reduced odds of an autism spectrum disorder in the offspring (98900).
• Brain tumor. It is unclear if dietary calcium intake is associated with risk of brain tumor. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 case-control studies has found that higher dietary calcium intake is associated with a lower odds of brain tumor when compared with lower dietary intake (113922). The validity of this finding is limited by the exploratory nature of the included studies, which analyzed all dietary ingredients for any potential associations.
• Cancer. Oral calcium alone does not seem to prevent cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Taking calcium alone does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of cancer (12118,15629). The role of calcium in cancer prevention when taken along with vitamin D is controversial, as conflicting results exist. One clinical trial shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1400-1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1100 IU daily have a 60% lower relative risk for developing cancer of any type. Approximately 25 postmenopausal females would need to take this combination for 4 years to prevent one occurrence of cancer (15629). However, a more recent clinical study shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of cancer at 4 years (93943). Reasons for the disparate results are not entirely clear. The discrepancies do not appear to be related to baseline vitamin D levels or different study populations. It is possible that, given the 10-year time lapse between the two publications, the discrepancies result from differences in cancer detection capability. Also, since cancer risk was a secondary outcome measure in the earlier study and a primary outcome measure in the more recent study, it is possible that the discrepancies result from differences in statistical methodologies. The effect of vitamin D and calcium on cancer risk in males and younger patients is not known. There is also interest in using calcium for reducing the risk of hematological malignancies. An analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU for up to 10 years is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of hematologic malignancies when compared with placebo. However, no effect on hematologic malignancy related mortality was seen (97354).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between a higher dietary intake of calcium and the risk of depression when compared with a lower dietary intake of calcium (96480).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if dietary calcium intake is associated with type 2 diabetes risk. Details: Some population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from the diet or supplements, alone or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713,96473,113929). One meta-analysis of cohort and cross-sectional studies found that the highest level of dietary calcium intake is associated with an 18% relative reduction in risk of type 2 diabetes when compared with the lowest level of intake. A dose-response analysis suggests that each 300, 600, and 1000 mg per day increase in dietary calcium intake is associated with a 7%, 14%, and 23% reduced risk of type 2 diabetes, respectively (113929). However, population research is often limited by confounding variables. For example, one analysis suggests that any beneficial effect might be influenced by concomitant magnesium intake (96473,113929), while another suggests that any benefit from increased intake may be more pronounced in females, adults aged 50 years or older, and Asian populations (113929). Furthermore, other population research has found that serum calcium levels higher than 9.6 mg/dL are associated with greater risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults with osteoporosis (95815).
• Dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for dyslipidemia. Details: One clinical study in adults with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia shows that adding calcium carbonate 400 mg three times daily to a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) for 6 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4% and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 4% when compared with the low-fat diet and placebo (2557). In contrast, a clinical study in females with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 800 mg daily for 2 years INCREASES total cholesterol levels and carotid intima-media thickness in postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, females when compared with placebo (97350). Calcium supplementation has also been evaluated in combination with vitamin D. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including adults with normolipidemia and dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily and vitamin D 200-7142 IU daily modestly improves HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplementation is most beneficial in patients with dyslipidemia at baseline (107227). The relationship between dietary calcium intake and serum lipid levels has also been evaluated in observational research. A meta-analysis of 7-11 observational studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with total cholesterol levels, although small differences in individual lipid parameters were identified. Additionally, a meta-analysis of 4-9 observational studies suggests that calcium intake is not associated with the risk of developing hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, or low HDL. A subgroup analysis found that higher calcium intake may be associated with lower triglyceride levels in Asian populations (113927). Overall, these findings are limited by significant heterogeneity and the cross-sectional nature of the included studies.
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing pain associated with dysmenorrhea. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg with vitamin D 5000 IU daily for three menstrual cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (95821). However, calcium carbonate 1000 mg taken alone seems to reduce pain when compared with placebo.
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but dietary calcium does not seem to have any effect (38893).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A very small clinical study in resistance-trained adults shows that taking calcium carbonate 500 mg 4 times daily for 3 weeks does not attenuate exercise-induced muscle damage from bench presses when compared with placebo (113933). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing falls. Details: Research suggests that calcium in combination with vitamin D, but not calcium alone, might prevent falls by decreasing body sway and normalizing systolic blood pressure (6362,11939,39038). Some experts think the combination of calcium and vitamin D may be important (11916). Preliminary clinical research in adults residing in a health care facility shows that taking vitamin D supplements while increasing dietary calcium and protein for 2 years reduces falls by 11% when compared with standard diets. Intervention diets were supplemented with milk, yogurt, and cheese to provide calcium 1142 mg and protein 69 grams daily (107235). There might also be different effects in females compared to males. In one study, females aged 65 years or older who took vitamin D 700 IU plus calcium citrate 500 mg daily over a 3-year period had a 46% lower risk of falling. However, this combination did not decrease falls in males (14291).
• Fluorosis. Oral calcium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking calcium orally, in combination with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and vitamin D, seems to be effective for reducing excessive fluoride levels in children and improving symptoms of fluorosis in children aged 6-12 years (990).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral calcium in combination with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing heart failure. Details: Based on a secondary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), taking calcium 1000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily does not reduce the risk of heart failure in the overall population or in individuals at high risk. However, in a subgroup of postmenopausal females without risk factors for heart failure, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of developing heart failure by about 37% (97307).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing blood levels of lead. Details: Lead is mobilized along with calcium from bone during pregnancy and lactation, resulting in increased serum concentrations of lead. One clinical study suggests that calcium supplementation does not significantly decrease these elevated lead concentrations (1586). However, another clinical study suggests that taking calcium reduces blood lead levels by 11% when compared with placebo, with greatest effects observed in those with high baseline levels of lead (38957).
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral calcium for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of calcium for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium alone or with vitamin D is beneficial for metabolic syndrome prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet and supplements alone, or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713).
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing nephrotic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium 500-1000 mg daily for 3 months in combination with vitamin D3 60,000 IU daily or weekly for 4 weeks has no effect on bone mineral density or the risk of relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (97355).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking calcium alone or with vitamin D3 1000 IU daily reduced the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but had no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma (104622).
• Oral mucositis. When used in combination with fluoride treatments, a calcium phosphate mouth rinse seems to prevent and reduce mucositis-related pain in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that using a particular mouth rinse (Caphosol, EUSA Pharma) containing calcium phosphate, in combination with fluoride treatments, reduces days of mucositis, the duration of pain, and the dose and days of morphine used when compared with placebo and fluoride treatment (38611).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: An older meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (38792). However, a more recent pooled analysis of 15 cohort and case-control studies has found that the highest intake of dietary or dairy calcium is associated with a 20% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared to the lowest intake (97349).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing postpartum depression risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium 2 grams daily beginning at 11-21 weeks gestation reduces depression at 12 weeks postpartum when compared with placebo. However, no benefit is seen at 6 weeks postpartum (39447).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing leg cramps during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking calcium 1 gram twice daily (as a mixture of salts) for 2 weeks can reduce pregnancy-related leg cramps during the second half of pregnancy when compared with no treatment (2567).
• Prematurity. It is unclear if supplemental calcium is beneficial for the growth and development of preterm infants. Details: A small clinical study in preterm infants consuming human milk shows that supplementation with calcium 45 mg/kg daily and phosphorus 25 mg/kg daily does not affect infant weight, length, head circumference, or risk of osteopenia after 6 weeks when compared with human milk alone (113924). However, the duration and size of this study may have been too limited to detect any difference between groups.
• Preterm labor. It is unclear if oral calcium reduces the risk of preterm labor. Details: A meta-analysis of 10 clinical studies shows that taking calcium supplements during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of preterm labor when compared with placebo (113909). A separate meta-analysis of 7 clinical studies conducted in China, which evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy, shows that this combination reduces the relative risk of preterm labor by 74% when compared with routine care (113913).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily might decrease the risk of developing prostate cancer (14133). However, some epidemiological research suggests that consuming very high doses of calcium, over 2000 mg daily, might actually increase the risk of developing prostate cancer (14134). Some epidemiological research also suggests that doses greater than 1500 mg daily increase the risk of poorly differentiated, clinically advanced, and fatal prostate cancer (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer (98894). However, contradictory research suggests that there is no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall risk of prostate cancer (14131,14132,104630).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Some population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke (4822,38678). However, other population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is not associated with a decreased risk of stroke (91350). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years does not affect the risk of stroke when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females, and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Vertigo. Oral calcium with vitamin D might reduce positional vertigo; the effect of calcium when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking calcium 500 mg and vitamin D 400 IU twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate calcium for these uses.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

EFFECTIVE

• Bowel preparation. Oral sodium phosphate is effective for cleansing the colon in preparation for colonoscopy; however, it is unclear whether sodium phosphate is as effective as polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution. Some products are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this use. However, due to the potential for kidney damage, sodium phosphate is not recommended as first-line therapy. Details: Sodium phosphate tablets (OsmoPrep, Salix Pharmaceuticals; Visicol, Salix Pharmaceuticals) are FDA-approved for cleansing the colon in preparation for colonoscopy. Clinical research shows that using the OsmoPrep formulation can achieve an "excellent" or "good" response rate, which is defined as having 90% of the mucosa visible with only some or little suctioning needed, in 94% to 97% of patients (88133). Similarly, using the specific product Visicol has been shown to achieve an excellent or good response rate in 82% to 86% of patients (94674). Non-FDA-approved sodium phosphate products have also been investigated. One such product (Fleet Phospho-soda, C. B. Fleet Co.) has been shown to achieve adequate bowel cleansing in 23% to 89% of patients (93846,94673). Another sodium phosphate tablet preparation (Clicolon tablets, Korea Pharma Co.) has been shown to achieve adequate bowel cleansing in 63% to 93% of patients (93848,93850,93853). Excellent or good bowel cleansing was found in 98.6% of patients using a 32-tablet regimen of other sodium phosphate tablets (Quiklean, Universal Integrated Corporation) (107008). Reasons for the differences in the percentage of patients who achieve adequate bowel cleansing with the same sodium phosphate product may relate to the method used to analyze bowel cleansing, differences in diet followed during bowel cleansing, and demographic factors (93846,93848,93850,93853). Various preparations (OsmoPrep, Salix Pharmaceuticals; Visicol, Salix Pharmaceuticals; Clicolon tablets, Korea Pharma Co.; Quiklean, Universal Integrated Corporation) have been used which contain 1.102 grams of sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate and 0.398 grams of sodium phosphate dibasic anhydrous. These products have been taken as 3-4 tablets with 8 ounces of water every 15 minutes for a total of 20 tablets the evening before colonoscopy, and 3-4 tablets with 8 ounces of water every 15 minutes for a total of 12-20 tablets the morning of a colonoscopy (88133,93848,93850,94674,107008). Also, sodium phosphate solution (Fleet Phospho-soda, C. B. Fleet Co.) containing sodium hydrogen phosphate 24.4 grams and disodium phosphate dodecahydrate 10.8 grams has also been used the morning and evening before the procedure (93846). Numerous publications have compared the bowel cleansing activity of sodium phosphate with PEG solution. When given as a split-overnight dosage, sodium phosphate is about as effective as PEG solutions in achieving adequate bowel cleansing. However, when day-before dosage is used, PEG is more effective for bowel cleansing than sodium phosphate (93861,93862,107008). Sodium phosphate and PEG may have different effectiveness depending on the colonic site assessed. When only trials assessing descending colon cleansing are considered, sodium phosphate is found to work similarly to PEG solutions. When only studies assessing ascending colon cleansing are considered, PEG is more effective for bowel cleansing than sodium phosphate (93861). Also, a large clinical trial in outpatients scheduled for non-sedated colonoscopy shows that receiving PEG resulted in an easier insertion and a less painful colonoscopy when compared with receiving sodium phosphate (104473). However, in patients with chronic constipation, sodium phosphate seems to be preferable. A meta-analysis of three small clinical studies in adults with chronic constipation shows that using sodium phosphate has an 87% greater chance of a successful bowel preparation when compared with using PEG (104472). Sodium phosphate is not recommended as first-line therapy for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy due to the potential for kidney damage (93863,94672). In fact, one sodium phosphate preparation (Fleet Phospho-soda, C. B. Fleet Co.) that was previously approved as an over-the-counter supplement for bowel preparation in the US was withdrawn from the market for this indication in December 2008 due to concerns for phosphate-induced kidney disease (94672). Of the sodium phosphate products that are still approved by the FDA, current guidelines recommend that these products not be used for bowel cleansing in patients with kidney disease, pre-existing electrolyte disturbances, congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, ascites, or inflammatory bowel disease. Guidelines also recommend that caution should be used if these products are prescribed for patients who are elderly, hypertensive, or taking certain classes of drugs (94672). For small bowel preparation for endoscopy, a meta-analysis suggests that sodium phosphate is no more effective than fasting alone (93860).
• Hypophosphatemia. Oral or intravenous phosphate salts are effective for the prevention or treatment of hypophosphatemia. Some products are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this use. Details: Taking sodium or potassium phosphate orally is effective for preventing and treating hypophosphatemia (15). Treating hypophosphatemia with oral phosphates requires monitoring of serum electrolyte levels to determine appropriate dosing (15). The FDA-approved intravenous (IV) product is also used for the correction of hypophosphatemia (8302,8303,88135). FDA-approved intravenous (IV) sodium phosphate or potassium phosphate 15-30 mmol is typically given over 2-12 hours. Higher doses have been used if needed to increase efficacy (8302,8303,88135).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Constipation. Oral or rectal sodium phosphate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an ingredient in over-the-counter (OTC) products to treat constipation. Details: Sodium phosphate is an FDA-permitted ingredient of oral and rectal OTC products intended for the treatment of constipation (88107).
• Dyspepsia. Oral aluminum phosphate and calcium phosphate are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as ingredients in over-the-counter (OTC) antacids. Details: Aluminum phosphate and calcium phosphate are FDA-permitted ingredients of oral OTC products intended for use as antacids (88107).
• Hypercalcemia. Although other treatments are preferred, oral non-calcium phosphate salts are beneficial for treatment of mild to moderate hypercalcemia. Details: Taking phosphate salts (except calcium phosphate) orally is effective for treating mild to moderate hypercalcemia (88144,88145). Treating hypercalcemia with oral phosphates requires monitoring of serum electrolyte levels to determine appropriate dosing (15); other agents are now preferred (6479). Intravenous phosphates should be avoided due to the risk of calcium precipitation in vital organs (metastatic calcification) (15,88144,88145).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Oral potassium phosphate seems to be beneficial for prevention of kidney stones in individuals with hypercalciuria. Details: Taking potassium phosphate orally may help prevent calcium oxalate kidney stones in patients with hypercalciuria (6470). Clinical research in adults with absorptive hypercalciuria and at high risk for stone formation shows that taking a specific slow-release potassium phosphate product (Uro-Phos-K, Mission Pharmacal), providing phosphate 620 mg orally twice daily for 4 days, reduces urinary calcium excretion by 35% to 40% (2208,2209). Potassium and sodium phosphate salts providing 1200-1500 mg of elemental phosphate daily have been used (2209,6470).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Athletic performance. The evidence is mixed as to whether oral sodium phosphate improves cycling or running performance. Most research suggests that oral calcium phosphate and potassium phosphate are not beneficial. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium phosphate or potassium phosphate orally does not improve running or cycling performance (2499,9300,8301). Evidence for the use of sodium phosphate to improve cycling performance is mixed. One very small clinical study shows that taking sodium phosphate as tribasic sodium phosphate dodecahydrate for 6 days before a 10-mile cycling trial increases mean power output by about 10% and decreases the time needed to complete the trial by 3% in trained male cyclists (88150). Other small clinical trials in trained cyclists show that taking the same form of sodium phosphate as 50 mg/kg of fat-free mass in four divided doses daily for 6 days modestly improves work, power output, and peak oxygen uptake and reduces heart rate during high-intensity cycling exercise when compared to baseline (93857,93858,93859,107007). However, conflicting research shows that taking a similar dosage of this form of sodium phosphate does not improve time trial performance, work accomplished relative to energy expenditure, power output, or oxygen uptake in trained cyclists (93855,93856,107007). Sodium phosphate has also been evaluated for improving running performance, with mixed findings. Two small clinical trials in female athletes show that tribasic sodium phosphate dodecahydrate 50 mg/kg of fat-free mass taken in four divided doses daily for 6 days moderately improves repeated sprint times when compared with placebo (93843,93844). However, taking the same dosage does not significantly improve sprint times in male athletes (93849). Also, sodium phosphate does not seem to improve endurance or aerobic capacity in treadmill tests (8301,93854). Reasons for the discrepancies regarding the effects of sodium phosphate on athletic performance are not entirely clear, but likely relate to the very small number of participants in the included trials.
• Diabetic ketoacidosis. Potassium phosphate infusion is not recommended as first-line therapy for adults with diabetic ketoacidosis. Details: Clinical research shows that intravenous infusion of potassium phosphate 8.5 mmol/hour (approximately 6 grams of phosphate over 24 hours) along with potassium chloride 12.5 mEq/hour provides no benefit over potassium chloride alone in adults with diabetic ketoacidosis (88149). Guidelines for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis in the both the US and UK do not recommend phosphate replacement for most patients. However, it may be considered in specific cases, such as cardiac dysfunction, anemia, respiratory depression, and serum phosphate concentrations below 1 mg/dL (107349,107350A).
• Osteoporosis. Calcium phosphate seems to be beneficial for bone density improvement; however, it does not seem to be more beneficial than calcium carbonate. Details: In postmenopausal adults with osteoporosis and low phosphate intakes, taking calcium 1800 mg daily as tricalcium phosphate for 12 months improves lumbar spine and hip densities. However, it is no more effective than taking the same amount of calcium as calcium carbonate (93847). The calcium products were used in combination subcutaneous teriparatide and oral vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 1000 IU daily.
• Refeeding syndrome. It is unclear if intravenous potassium phosphate or sodium phosphate is beneficial for prevention of refeeding syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that giving intravenous sodium and potassium phosphates, 50 mmol (1.56 grams) phosphate over 24 hours, prevents the refeeding syndrome seen when restarting adequate nutrition after severe malnutrition or starvation when compared with historical controls (88148). More evidence is needed to rate phosphate salts for these uses.

(Read more about PHOSPHATE SALTS)

EFFECTIVE

• Pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy. Intravenous vitamin B6 is effective for controlling pyridoxine-dependent seizures. Details: Pyridoxine-dependent seizures are a rare type of refractory seizures in neonates that do not respond to anticonvulsant drugs. These seizures are typically controlled within minutes of intravenous administration of pyridoxine, a form of vitamin B6. Pyridoxine-dependent seizures can be due to genetic (autosomal recessive) pyridoxine dependency, or more commonly, a result of the use of high-dose pyridoxine during pregnancy (8197,8198).
• Sideroblastic anemia. Oral vitamin B6 is effective for treating hereditary sideroblastic anemia. Details: Taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) orally is effective for treating hereditary sideroblastic anemia (15,9518). Taking the active form of vitamin B6 (pyridoxal-5'-phosphate) also seems to be effective in cases in which the patient does not respond to pyridoxine (93049).
• Vitamin B6 deficiency. Oral vitamin B6 is effective for preventing and treating vitamin B6 deficiency. Details: Taking oral vitamin B6 can prevent and treat vitamin B6 deficiency (15).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Hyperhomocysteinemia. Taking vitamin B6 orally, alone or in combination with folic acid, is effective for reducing hyperhomocysteinemia. Details: Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) seems to lower homocysteine concentrations when folic acid and vitamin B12 are at physiologic levels or when given with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplements (9451,83042,107136). A combination of vitamin B6 100 mg and folic acid 0.5 mg daily seems to lower homocysteine levels by about 35% and is recommended for people with postprandial hyperhomocysteinemia (1489,9406). Other research shows that taking pyridoxine 50-200 mg daily reduces postprandial homocysteine levels by 32% to 35% (9406,10350). Pyridoxine also seems to reduce homocysteine levels in patients with kidney failure, kidney transplant patients (1489,6884,9414,9415), or patients who receive general anesthesia with nitrous oxide (9481). However, some research in healthy adults suggests that adding pyridoxine to folic acid might not provide any additional benefit over folic acid alone (9400,9405,9409,50145). Hyperhomocysteinemia is considered by some to be an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis, recurrent thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke (1899,3323,9402,9405,9408,9409). However, elevated homocysteine levels may be a marker, as opposed to a cause, of vascular disease (11387,11388). A 5 µmol/L increase in plasma homocysteine increases the risk of cerebrovascular disease by 50% and the odds of coronary heart disease by 60% and 80% in males and females, respectively (9407,9411). However, it is not clear if reducing homocysteine levels results in reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (1489,6883,6884,9308,9400,9405,9409). Folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 supplementation can reduce total homocysteine from 13.4 to 11 µmol/L. However, this reduction does not seem to help with secondary prevention of death or myocardial infarction, and some research even suggests an increase in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk (11387,13482,50423,83050,97619). There is also debate about whether supplementation with homocysteine-lowering B vitamins can reduce the risk of stroke. A number of large clinical studies and meta-analyses show that supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12, alone or in combination, does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with CVD or impaired renal function (11387,13482,50423,83050,96150). However, a more recent meta-analysis shows that B vitamin supplementation modestly reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo in patients at risk for or with a history of CVD (97619). Also, a meta-analysis in patients with a history of stroke shows that B vitamin supplementation modestly reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% and the risk of vascular death by 11% when compared with placebo (107136).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for patients with antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Details: Clinical research in male patients with hyperprolactinemia who are on a consistent antipsychotic dose shows that taking vitamin B6 300 mg twice daily for 16 weeks reduces serum prolactin levels by 68%, compared with 37% in patients taking aripiprazole 5 mg twice daily. Also, 67% of patients taking vitamin B6 had prolactin levels less than 40 mcg/mL versus 2% of those taking aripiprazole (107128).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Oral vitamin B6 seems to decrease urinary oxalate levels and decrease the risk of kidney stone formation in some patients. Details: There is some evidence that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) orally, alone or in combination with magnesium, can decrease urinary oxalate levels in people with type I primary hyperoxaluria, a hereditary disorder (1201,6437,6438,6439,6440,8548,8549,8550). Additionally, a small clinical study in this population suggests that intravenous pyridoxine hydrochloride can reduce urinary oxalate by 25.5% when compared to baseline (90796). In patients with idiopathic hyperoxaluria, taking a combination of pyridoxine 25mg and magnesium oxide 400 mg for 3 months decreases urinary oxalate by approximately 16%, with 68% of patients experiencing a reduction. However, supplementation is less effective than following a low-oxalate diet, which reduces urinary oxalate in 91% of patients by an average of 31% (107127). There is also preliminary evidence that higher pyridoxine intake in females with no history of kidney stones is associated with decreased risk of kidney stone formation (6441), but this association has not been found in males (6442).
• Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oral vitamin B6 may reduce nausea and vomiting in some pregnant patients and is sometimes used in combination with doxylamine. Details: While some conflicting evidence exists, most small clinical studies suggest that oral vitamin B6 is effective for improving nausea and vomiting associated with pregnancy when compared with baseline or placebo. However, vitamin B6 may not be as effective as ginger (110459). Two small clinical studies show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 25 mg every 8 hours for 3-4 days decreases pregnancy-induced nausea severity and vomiting incidence when compared with placebo (6168,16306). A larger clinical trial shows that taking lower doses of vitamin B6, 10 mg every 8 hours over 5 days, improves pregnancy-induced nausea, but not vomiting, when compared with placebo (6167). A small clinical study in patients with mild to moderate nausea and vomiting shows that taking a higher dose of 40 mg twice daily for 4 days is more effective than placebo, but no better than ginger 500 mg twice daily (99404). The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) considers vitamin B6 at a dose of 10-25 mg 3 to 4 times daily a first-line treatment for pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting due to its benign safety profile (111601). However, it is not effective for all patients, such as those with hyperemesis gravidarum, a severe form of pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Adding vitamin B6 20 mg three times daily for 2 weeks to intravenous rehydration, metoclopramide, and thiamine seems to be no more effective than placebo for reducing vomiting in hyperemesis gravidarum (99405). Vitamin B6 is also sometimes used in combination with doxylamine. In fact, a combination of vitamin B6 plus doxylamine (Diclegis or Bonjesta, Duchesnay Inc., and various generics) has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a prescription product111601). ACOG recommends vitamin B6 in combination with doxylamine as another first-line treatment option (111601). However, the clinical trial used to obtain FDA approval has some methodological problems, and the significance of the results has been questioned. The improvement in symptom scores seen with Diclegis was less than one point on a 13-point scale, which is unlikely to be clinically significant (97998). Also, some clinical research shows that taking pyridoxine 25 mg and doxylamine 12.5 mg is less effective than ondansetron 4 mg when taken every 8 hours for 5 days. Only 41% of the patients using pyridoxine and doxylamine had a clinically significant reduction in nausea, compared to 92% of patients using ondansetron (90797). The combination of vitamin B6 and doxylamine is also studied with acupuncture. A large clinical study in patients with moderate to severe pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting conducted in China shows that taking vitamin B6-doxylamine (Diclegis, Duchesnay, Inc) 20 to 40 mg each at bedtime for 14 days in combination with daily acupuncture modestly improves patient-reported nausea and vomiting scores when compared with either intervention alone (111820). However, it is unclear whether this improvement is clinically significant.
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Oral vitamin B6 seems to reduce PMS symptoms. Details: There is some evidence that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) orally can improve symptoms of PMS such as breast pain or tenderness (mastalgia) and depression in some patients. Pyridoxine in doses of at least 50 mg daily, plus magnesium oxide 200 mg daily, seems to relieve PMS-related anxiety and other symptoms (8555,39007,82962). Although some clinicians advocate doses of pyridoxine 200-500 mg daily for PMS, doses of 50-100 mg daily seem to work just as well. There is no apparent dose-response curve for PMS, so the lowest effective dose should be used. Higher doses might increase the risk of side effects (3093).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Age-related cognitive decline. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to slow age-related cognitive decline. Details: One clinical trial in elderly people with memory complaints shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 0.8 mg, vitamin B12 0.5 mg, and vitamin B6 (form not specified) 20 mg daily for 24 months reduces cerebral atrophy in the gray matter regions associated with Alzheimer disease by up to seven-fold when compared with placebo. However, this protection does not occur in patients with the lowest average blood levels of homocysteine (90374). Furthermore, other clinical research shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 3-75 mg daily in combination with folic acid and vitamin B12 does not improve cognitive function in elderly adults (14392,50225,50510).
• Alzheimer disease. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to improve cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer disease when used in combination with other B vitamins. Also, oral vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of developing this condition. Details: Clinical research in patients with probable Alzheimer disease taking routine medications shows that taking vitamin B6 25 mg with folic acid 5 mg and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for 18 months does not have a beneficial effect on cognitive function or the severity of disease when compared with placebo. In this study, all patients were consuming a folate-fortified diet (50319). Also, population research in elderly adults has found that a high intake of vitamin B6 from dietary or supplemental sources is not associated with a decreased risk of Alzheimer disease when compared to lower vitamin B6 intake (13165,15270).
• Carpal tunnel syndrome. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Details: Most research shows that people with carpal tunnel syndrome are not generally deficient in vitamin B6 and do not benefit from taking vitamin B6 supplements (8203,8937,9448,9450,9478,9482). Although early studies by a single group of researchers, as well as anecdotal reports, suggest that taking vitamin B6 may relieve carpal tunnel symptoms, more reliable research has not supported these findings (8202,9445,9447,9449,9483,15955,83086). Vitamin B6 has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome shows that taking a combination product containing vitamin B6, alpha-lipoic acid, acetyl-L-carnitine, phosphatidylserine, turmeric, and vitamins C, E, B1, B2, and B12 twice daily for 60 days reduces symptom severity and pain but does not improve measures of hand and wrist function when compared with a control (111702). The dose of vitamin B6 was not provided. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of blinding and placebo. Additionally, it is unclear if the effects are due to vitamin B6, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Cataracts. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to slow cataract development. Details: Clinical research in females with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or at increased risk of CVD shows that taking a combination of folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 (form not specified) 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for an average of 7.3 years does not reduce the risk of cataracts when compared with placebo. Furthermore, the risk of cataract extraction was increased by 28% (96149).
• Chemotherapy-induced acral erythema. While some conflicting evidence exists, most research suggests that oral or topical vitamin B6 does not seem to prevent or reduce the severity of acral erythema induced by chemotherapy. Details: A meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials and 4 observational studies shows that taking vitamin B6 60-500 mg daily for up to 8 chemotherapy cycles does not prevent chemotherapy-induced acral erythema or reduce the incidence of severe cases when compared with control. Most studies used capecitabine chemotherapy alone or in combination, and one study used pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; however, no subgroup analysis was conducted to differentiate chemotherapy regimens. Results did not seem to vary based on study location, study design, or vitamin B6 dose (104930). However, a more recent preliminary clinical study in patients receiving doxorubicin for multiple myeloma shows that taking vitamin B6 100 mg on the first day of chemotherapy then twice daily for 7 days with each cycle reduces the risk of developing acral erythema by 72%, but does not improve the severity of acral erythema, when compared with no vitamin B6 supplementation (110458). Also, one small, low-quality clinical study suggests that taking vitamin B6 400 mg daily reduces the risk of moderate or severe chemotherapy-induced acral erythema when compared with vitamin B6 200 mg daily; however, the higher dose also seems to be associated with worsened tumor response and increased treatment failure (97620). Topical vitamin B6 has also failed to show benefit. A small clinical study in patients with acral erythema from capecitabine or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin shows that applying vitamin B6 1% cream to affected areas three times daily for 6 weeks does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (104929).
• Colorectal adenoma. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of developing colorectal adenomas. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg, daily for up to 9.2 years does not reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma in females at high risk of cardiovascular disease when compared with placebo (90389).
• Eclampsia. Oral or intramuscular vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of eclampsia. Details: Meta-analyses of limited clinical research in pregnant patients show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), either as 25 mg daily or a single dose of 100 mg orally or intramuscularly, does not reduce the risk of eclampsia when compared with control (83046,96166).
• Osteoporosis. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Details: Clinical research in patients with cerebrovascular disease shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 2 mg, vitamin B6 (form not specified) 25 mg, and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily for up to 10.5 years does not prevent osteoporotic fractures when compared with placebo (90377). Furthermore, a secondary analysis of two large studies in patients with cardiovascular disease has found that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 40 mg daily in addition to folic acid and vitamin B12 for 1-3 years is associated with a 42% increased risk of hip fracture over an 11-year period when compared with only folic acid and vitamin B12 (96163). This finding is limited because these studies were not designed to assess the effects of vitamin B6 on fracture risk and the analyses were not adjusted for baseline bone health or fall risk.
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral or intramuscular vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia. Details: Meta-analyses of limited clinical research in pregnant patients show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), either as 25 mg daily or a single dose of 100 mg orally or intramuscularly, does not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia when compared with placebo (83046,96166).
• Preterm labor. Oral or intramuscular vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of preterm labor. Details: Meta-analyses of limited clinical research in pregnant patients shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), either as 25 mg daily or a single dose of 100 mg orally or intramuscularly, does not reduce the risk of preterm labor when compared with placebo (83046,96166).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults and children with inflammatory acne shows that taking 1-4 tablets of a specific product (NicAzel, Elorac Inc.) containing vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), nicotinamide, azelaic acid, zinc, copper, and folic acid for 8 weeks reduces inflammatory lesions and improves appearance in 88% and 81% of patients, respectively, when compared to baseline (90800). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large-scale clinical study shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 50 mg, vitamin B12 1000 mcg, and folic acid 2.5 mg daily reduces the risk for AMD in females over 40 years of age with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or with risk factors for CVD. Those who took this combination for an average of 7.3 years had a 34% reduced risk of developing AMD and a 41% reduced risk of visually significant AMD when compared with placebo (14620). It is unclear if this effect is due to vitamin B6, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Angioplasty. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Some evidence suggests that vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 10 mg, folic acid 1 mg, and vitamin B12 400 mcg daily can decrease the rate of restenosis in patients treated with balloon angioplasty (8009,9412). However, this combination does not seem to be as effective for reducing restenosis in patients after coronary stenting (8009). An intravenous loading dose of folic acid, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), and vitamin B12 followed by oral administration of folic acid 1.2 mcg, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 48 mg, and vitamin B12 60 mcg daily after bare metal coronary stenting also does not seem to reduce restenosis and might actually increase restenosis (12150,12151). Due to the lack of evidence of benefit and potential for harm, this combination of vitamins should not be recommended for patients receiving coronary stents (12151). It is unclear if any effects are due to vitamin B6, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Antipsychotic-induced metabolic side effects. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6, as an adjunct to progesterone, is beneficial in patients with antipsychotic-induced amenorrhea. Details: A small clinical study in females with antipsychotic-induced amenorrhea shows that taking vitamin B6 80 mg three times daily for 1 month plus intramuscular progesterone daily for 5 days increases levels of estradiol and follicle stimulating hormone, reduces prolactin levels, and increases the rate of clinical efficacy, defined as the normalization of menstruation and improvement in endocrine indicators, by 14% when compared with progesterone alone (110457).
• Anxiety. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with anxiety. Details: Clinical research in college students shows that taking vitamin B6 100 mg daily for one month does not reduce anxiety scores when compared with placebo (110453). However, because a diagnosis of anxiety was not a requirement for study participation, it is unclear if these findings can be generalized to patients diagnosed with anxiety.
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with asthma. Details: Preliminary clinical studies show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 200-300 mg daily may improve symptoms of asthma in some patients, but not others, when compared with placebo (7064,7065). Studies have yielded conflicting results, with some research suggesting that it may only be beneficial in children with severe asthma (7065). Additionally, some research suggests that theophylline may lower vitamin B6 levels, although it is unclear if vitamin B6 supplementation is beneficial (4522,7066,9503).
• Atherosclerosis. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with intermediate risk for coronary heart disease shows that taking a specific supplement (Kyolic, Total Heart Health, Formula 108, Wakunga) containing vitamin B6 12.5 mg, aged garlic extract 250 mg, vitamin B12 100 mcg, folic acid 300 mcg, and L-arginine 100 mg daily for 12 months reduces coronary artery calcium progression when compared with placebo (88385). It is unclear if this effect is due to vitamin B6, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with eczema. Details: A small clinical study in children with eczema shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) 50 mg daily for 4 weeks does not reduce symptoms such as redness and itchiness when compared with placebo (83090).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for ADHD. Details: A small crossover study in children with ADHD shows that taking vitamin B6 600 mg, niacinamide and ascorbic acid 3 grams, and calcium pantothenate 1.2 grams daily for 6 weeks does not improve behavior scores when compared with placebo (9957).
• Autism spectrum disorder. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B6 for autism, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B6 for this condition.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with type 1 bipolar disorder who are taking lithium and experiencing an acute episode of mania shows that taking vitamin B6 80 mg daily for 8 weeks does not improve cognitive function or the severity of mania when compared with placebo. Cognitive function was reduced in patients taking vitamin B6; any effect on sleep was unclear (107132).
• Cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces overall cancer risk. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin B6 is associated with a 22% reduced risk of cancer, including esophageal, pancreatic, gastric, colorectal, and breast cancer. However, when dietary and supplemental vitamin B6 intake is considered, the inverse association between vitamin B6 and cancer risk is weaker and limited to fewer tumor sites. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of 9 clinical studies shows that taking vitamin B6 3-100 mg orally daily for 2-7.3 years, in combination with vitamin B12 and folate, does not reduce the risk of cancer in patients with cardiovascular disease or kidney failure (96164).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral vitamin B6, taken along with other B vitamins, does not seem to improve secondary prevention of death or myocardial infarction in patients with CVD. However, it might slightly lower the risk of stroke. Details: Overall evidence from clinical research and meta-analyses shows that taking vitamin B6 in combination with folic acid and/or vitamin B12 does not seem to help with secondary prevention of death or myocardial infarction in patients with or at risk for CVD (11387,13482,34540,50423,83050,90379,97619). In fact, some research suggests that long-term supplementation with vitamin B6, folic acid, and vitamin B12 for secondary prevention increases the risk of CVD by 20% despite lowering homocysteine levels by 30% (13482). However, some research shows that taking vitamin B6 in combination with other B vitamins modestly reduces the risk of stroke, although results are conflicting (11387,13482,50423,83050,96150,96165,97619,107136). Additionally, it is unclear which specific combination of B vitamins is optimal for reducing stroke risk and which patients are most likely to benefit. In 2001, prior to the publication of the highest quality research on this topic, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368).
• Cognitive function. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in healthy adults aged 40-65 years shows that taking a supplement containing vitamin B6, ginkgo leaf, bacopa, and other B vitamins twice daily for 12 weeks does not improve memory or attention when compared with placebo (111334).
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces the risk of colorectal cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of observational studies suggests that the highest dietary intake of vitamin B6 is associated with a 20% reduced risk of colorectal cancer when compared with the lowest dietary intake. However, this association was not shown in subgroup analyses of studies conducted in Australia, Europe, or North America (111600). The validity of this analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies.
• Dental caries. There is limited evidence on the oral use of vitamin B6 for dental decay during pregnancy. Details: Meta-analyses of limited clinical research show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), 25 mg daily or a single dose of 100 mg orally or intramuscularly, may reduce the risk of dental decay during pregnancy when compared with placebo (83046,96166).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces the risk of developing depression or improves symptoms of depression. Details: Clinical research in healthy college students shows that taking vitamin B6 100 mg daily for one month does not reduce depression scores when compared with placebo (1104453). However, because a diagnosis of depression was not a requirement for study participation, it is unclear if these findings can be generalized to patients diagnosed with depression. Whether vitamin B6 reduces the risk of developing depression is also unclear. A meta-analysis of population research has found that the highest dietary intake of vitamin B6 is associated with a 19% lower risk of depression when compared with the lowest intake. However, sub-analyses suggest that this association is only relevant in females and not males (107133). In one individual population study in community dwelling older adults included in the analysis, the consumption of at least 1.71 mg of vitamin B6 daily from food was associated with a 43% reduction in the likelihood of becoming depressed when compared with the consumption of 1.33 mg or less daily in females. However, there was no association between vitamin B6 levels and risk of depression in males, and the finding in females was no longer significant when adjusted for total energy intake, since foods rich in vitamin B6 are energy-dense (96168). Another observational longitudinal study in healthy adults starting oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel has found that taking vitamin B6 25 mg daily for 6-12 months is associated with a 40% lower risk of depression when compared with no supplementation (90789). Most available studies are cross-sectional in nature, making any conclusions related to causation difficult.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with type 2 diabetes or gestational diabetes. Details: Observational research in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes has found that dietary intake of vitamin B6 in the highest quartile is associated with 53% lower odds of developing cardiovascular disease, defined as a non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina, when compared with vitamin B6 intake in the lowest quartile (110452). Small clinical studies in patients with gestational diabetes and vitamin B6 deficiency shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 100 mg daily for 2 weeks improves glucose tolerance and blood glucose levels when compared with baseline (82967,83088). However, there is concern that these findings were confounded by dietary alterations. This benefit was not observed in a subsequent small case series in patients with gestational diabetes (22380).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research suggests that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid (L-methylfolate), vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin), and vitamin B6 (pyridoxal-5'-phosphate) for 24 weeks does not improve neural dysfunction based on vibration perception when compared with placebo in patients with diabetic neuropathy. However, taking this combination appears to modestly improve neuropathy symptoms and quality of life related to mental functioning when compared with placebo (90375).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with dysmenorrhea. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking vitamin B6 (form not specified) 200 mg daily reduces pain associated with dysmenorrhea when compared with placebo. However, taking vitamin B6 in combination with magnesium does not reduce pain when compared with placebo (77388).
• Fibromyalgia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with fibromyalgia. Details: A small clinical study in patients with fibromyalgia shows that taking vitamin B6 80 mg daily for 8 weeks does not improve pain, disease severity, anxiety, depression, or quality of life when compared with placebo (110454).
• Gastroenteritis-associated nausea and vomiting. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in children with gastroenteritis. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 6 months to 12 years with acute viral gastroenteritis shows that taking vitamin B6 (form not specified) does not improve symptoms of dehydration or the frequency of vomiting when compared with placebo (90793).
• Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for Helicobacter pylori. Details: A large clinical study in adults with Helicobacter pylori infection shows that taking vitamin B6 20 mg twice daily for 2 weeks alongside conventional quadruple therapy does not improve eradication rates when compared with a control group not receiving vitamin B6 (113551). Conventional therapy consisted of a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, minocycline, and metronidazole. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of placebo and inadequate blinding.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces blood pressure. Details: One small clinical study in patients with essential hypertension shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) 5 mg/kg daily for 4 weeks can reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure when compared with baseline (83091). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Hypertriglyceridemia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces triglyceride levels. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that vitamin B6 (form not specified) 50 mg daily for 12 weeks does not reduce triglyceride levels in people with hypertriglyceridemia when compared with placebo. However, vitamin B6 appears to decrease total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by approximately 9% in these patients (59028).
• Infertility. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B6 for infertility, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B6 for this condition.
• Insomnia. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in healthy adults with self-reported sleep difficulty shows that taking a specific product (LZ Complex3, Sanofi Consumer Healthcare Pty Ltd.) containing vitamin B6, zizyphus extract, hops extract, hydrolyzed milk protein (Lactium), and magnesium oxide nightly, 30 minutes before bed, for 2 weeks does not improve sleep quality, daytime functioning, or physical fatigue when compared with placebo. However, due to the large improvement seen in both the treatment and placebo groups, the effectiveness of this product is unclear (95971).
• Isoniazid-induced neuropathy. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 prevents the development of neuropathy in patients taking isoniazid. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients taking isoniazid for tuberculosis shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 6 mg daily reduces the development of neuropathy when compared with control (83068).
• Lactation. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 helps to suppress postpartum lactation. Details: A meta-analysis of two small clinical trials shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 400-600 mg daily for 6-7 days postpartum does not suppress lactation when compared with no treatment (83047).
• Levetiracetam-induced side effects. While some conflicting evidence exists, several small, low-quality studies suggest that oral vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) may reduce some neuropsychiatric adverse effects related to the use of levetiracetam. Details: In an analysis of case reports, retrospective studies, and a single low-quality prospective study, improvement in levetiracetam-associated neuropsychiatric symptoms occurred in approximately 73% of patients taking pyridoxine (107137). A more recent preliminary clinical trial in children ages 1-17 years shows that taking pyridoxine 10 or 15 mg/kg daily as needed based on symptoms improves behavioral side effects associated with levetiracetam by a small amount when compared with low-dose pyridoxine 0.5 mg/kg daily used as placebo (107124). Also, observational research in children ages 9 months to 14 years has found that taking vitamin B6 is associated with improved behavior and a 44% lower risk of levetiracetam discontinuation when compared with no vitamin B6 supplementation (110455). Some observational research in adults with levetiracetam-associated irritability has found that taking vitamin B6 is associated with an improvement in irritability in 45% of patients when compared to baseline (107129). However, a small clinical trial in adults with epilepsy shows that taking pyridoxine 40 mg daily for 3 weeks does not improve levetiracetam-related psychiatric adverse effects when compared with placebo (110456). This study may have been underpowered to detect differences between groups. Pyridoxine doses used in the studies above have ranged from 50-400 mg daily in children and 40-600 mg daily in adults (107124,107129,107137,110456).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if dietary or oral vitamin B6 reduces lung cancer risk. Details: Epidemiological research has found that higher serum levels of vitamin B6 in male smokers is associated with a lower risk of lung cancer (9454). Also, people with blood levels of vitamin B6 in the top quartile have a modestly lower risk of lung cancer when compared with those whose levels are in the lowest quartile. The association is stronger for males and for people who have smoked (97999). However, other epidemiological research found that increased dietary intake of vitamin B6 is not associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer (96164).
• Menopausal symptoms. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B6 for menopausal symptoms, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B6 for this condition.
• Motion sickness. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B6 for motion sickness, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B6 for this condition.
• Nausea and vomiting. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for nausea and vomiting in patients taking oral contraceptives or antibiotics for Helicobacter pylori. Details: A large clinical study in adults with Helicobacter pylori infection shows that taking vitamin B6 20 mg twice daily for 2 weeks alongside conventional quadruple therapy reduces the incidence and severity of gastrointestinal adverse effects when compared with a control group not receiving vitamin B6 (113551). Conventional therapy consisted of a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, minocycline, and metronidazole. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of placebo and inadequate blinding. An observational longitudinal study in healthy females taking oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel has found that taking vitamin B6 25 mg daily for 6-12 months is associated with a 43% reduced risk of nausea when compared with no supplementation (90789).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 for patients with NAFLD. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with NAFLD shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 30 mg three times daily for 12 weeks does not reduce levels of liver transaminases or plasma lipids when compared with baseline. However, hepatic fat accumulation was modestly reduced (107130). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 in beneficial in overweight or obese individuals. Details: A small clinical trial in females with a body mass index (BMI) of at least 25 kg/m² shows that taking vitamin B6 as pyridoxine 80 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces fat mass and improves insulin resistance and triglyceride levels by a small amount when compared with placebo. Although some other anthropometric and metabolic indices were improved when compared with baseline, there was no effect of pyridoxine on body weight, visceral adiposity, or other endpoints when compared with placebo (107131).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces the risk of overall mortality. Details: Observational research in US adults has found that dietary intake of vitamin B6 in the highest quintile is associated with a 12% to 21% lower risk of all-cause mortality and a 31% to 44% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality when compared with the lowest quintile of dietary vitamin B6 intake (110451).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer. Details: Observational research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin B6 is associated with a 37% lower risk of developing pancreatic cancer when compared with lower intake (104927).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with postpartum depression. Details: Preliminary clinical research in individuals considered at increased risk for postpartum depression, but without clinical depression, shows that taking vitamin B6 80 mg daily from the 28th week of pregnancy until birth, and then 40 mg daily for one month, reduces symptoms of depression 1.5 months after birth when compared with baseline (measured during the third trimester) and when compared with placebo. However, it is unclear if any of the patients included in the study developed postpartum depression, as there were no changes in overall symptoms in patients taking placebo (107126).
• Proton pump inhibitor-induced gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for proton pump inhibitor-induced GI symptoms. Details: A large clinical study in adults with Helicobacter pylori infection shows that taking vitamin B6 20 mg twice daily for 2 weeks alongside conventional quadruple therapy reduces the incidence and severity of gastrointestinal adverse effects when compared with a control group not receiving vitamin B6 (113551). Conventional therapy consisted of a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, minocycline, and metronidazole. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of placebo and inadequate blinding.
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with RLS. Details: A small clinical study in adults with RLS who are beginning treatment with pramipexole shows that also taking vitamin B6 40 mg daily for 2 months moderately improves RLS scores and sleep quality scores when compared with pramipexole and placebo (110052).
• Schizophrenia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Details: Clinical research in male patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia who are on a consistent antipsychotic dose shows that adding vitamin B6 300 mg twice daily for 16 weeks modestly improves psychotic symptoms and some measures of cognitive performance when compared with adding aripiprazole 5 mg twice daily (107128). More research is needed to determine if these benefits are clinically relevant.
• Seizures. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for preventing seizures in patients with glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) deficiency. Details: Observational case series in a small number of children and young adults with GPI deficiency has found that taking vitamin B6 20-30 mg/kg daily for 3-12 months is associated with some reduction in seizure frequency in 9 of 13 patients. However, no patient reached seizure freedom (107125,107135). In one case series, treatment for 12 months was associated with modest developmental improvements in almost all patients (107135). The study patient populations were slightly different in terms of age and underlying genetic causes for GPI deficiency.
• Sickle cell disease. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other B vitamins; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with sickle cell disease shows that taking vitamin B6 4.2-6 mg, vitamin B12 4.2-6 mcg, and folic acid 700 mcg daily might lower homocysteine levels. However, it is unknown if this will reduce the risk of endothelial damage in these patients (9324).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6, either alone or with other B vitamins, is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: There is some debate about whether supplementation with homocysteine-lowering B vitamins, including vitamin B6, can reduce the risk of stroke. A number of clinical studies and meta-analyses show that supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12, alone or in combination, does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or impaired kidney function (11387,13482,50423,83050,96150). However, a more recent meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials, including over 44,000 patients at risk for or with a history of CVD, shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo (97619). This meta-analysis differed from some of the earlier analyses due to the inclusion of several additional clinical trials. Also, another meta-analysis of three clinical trials including 9900 patients with a history of stroke shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% when compared with placebo, although this finding was determined to have a low level of certainty. Based on two clinical trials, there was also a 17% reduced risk of vascular death and an 11% reduction in the combined risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death (107136). In 2001, prior to the publication of the highest quality research on this topic, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368). Unfortunately, even after the publication of higher quality research, it is still unclear which specific combination of B vitamins is optimal and which patients are most likely to benefit. One network meta-analysis shows that a combination of folic acid and vitamin B6 lowers the risk of stroke more effectively than B vitamin mixtures that include vitamin B12 (96165). However, this analysis is limited because it didn't account for dosing. Exposure to low, but not high amounts, of vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) seems to reduce stroke risk (96150).
• Tardive dyskinesia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 prevents tardive dyskinesia in patients taking neuroleptic drugs. Details: A small clinical study in patients taking neuroleptic drugs for schizophrenia shows that taking vitamin B6 (form not specified) 400 mg daily seems to improve Parkinsonian, dystonic, and dyskinetic symptoms when compared with placebo (8558).
• Tourette syndrome. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small, nonblinded clinical study in children aged 4-17 years with untreated Tourette syndrome or with chronic tic disorder and associated symptoms of anxiety shows that taking a liquid nutritional supplement providing vitamin B6 2.8 mg and L-theanine 200 mg daily for 2 months improves scores on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale, but does not reduce anxiety, when compared with patients receiving psychoeducation (108555). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Vincristine-induced neuropathy. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with pyridostigmine; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children ages 11 months to 13 years with neuropathy due to vincristine treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, shows that taking vitamin B6 150 mg/m2 and pyridostigmine 3 mg/kg twice daily for 3 months is associated with reduced severity of sensory and motor neuropathy when compared with baseline (104928). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group. More evidence is needed to rate vitamin B6 for these uses.

(Read more about VITAMIN B6)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (7555,12928,12946,95817). However, excessive doses should be avoided. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: Age 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51+ years, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stone, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Other clinical studies suggest that, when combined with vitamin D supplementation, calcium supplementation is not associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Other analyses report conflicting results and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day, to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484), and to combine calcium supplementation with vitamin D supplementation (93533).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. The National Academy of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51 years and older, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Other clinical studies suggest that, when combined with vitamin D supplementation, calcium supplementation is not associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Other analyses report conflicting results and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients to not consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day, to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484), and to combine calcium supplementation with vitamin D supplementation (93533).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (17506).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (945,1586,3263,3264,17506). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prescribing oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancy to those with low dietary calcium intake to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the same daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age independent of pregnancy status: 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg (17506). Doses over these amounts might increase the risk of neonatal hypocalcemia-induced seizures possibly caused by transient neonatal hypoparathyroidism in the setting of excessive calcium supplementation during pregnancy, especially during the third trimester. Neonatal hypocalcemia is a risk factor for neonatal seizures (97345).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately short-term (15). ...when sodium phosphate is used rectally and appropriately, no more than once every 24 hours, short-term (104471). Long-term use or high doses used orally or rectally require monitoring of serum electrolytes (2494,2495,2496,2497,2498,3092,112922). ...when used intravenously. Potassium phosphate is an FDA-approved prescription drug (15).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when phosphate (expressed as phosphorus) intake exceeds the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4 grams daily for adults under 70 years and 3 grams daily for adults older than 70. Hyperphosphatemia, resulting in electrolyte disturbances, alterations in calcium homeostasis, and calcification of nonskeletal tissues, may occur (7555). ...when used rectally more frequently than once every 24 hours, in excessive doses, with longer retention enema time, or in older patients with comorbidity or renal impairment (112922). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns that this may increase the risk of hyperphosphatemia, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalances leading to kidney and heart damage (104471).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately at recommended dietary allowances (RDAs). The daily RDAs are: children 1-3 years, 460 mg; children 4-8 years, 500 mg; males and females 9-18 years, 1250 mg (7555). ...when sodium phosphate is used rectally and appropriately, no more than once every 24 hours, short-term in children 2 years and older (104471). ...when used intravenously. Intravenous potassium phosphate is an FDA-approved prescription drug (15).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when phosphate (expressed as phosphorus) intake exceeds the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 3 grams daily for children 1-8 years of age and 4 grams daily for children 9 years and older. Hyperphosphatemia, resulting in electrolyte disturbances, alterations in calcium homeostasis, and calcification of nonskeletal tissues, may occur (7555). ...when sodium phosphate is used rectally more frequently than once every 24 hours, or in children under 2 years of age or with Hirchsprung disease (112922). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns that these uses may increase the risk of hyperphosphatemia, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalances leading to kidney and heart damage (104471).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately at the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) of 1250 mg daily for individuals 14-18 years of age and 700 mg daily for those over 18 years of age (7555). ...when sodium phosphate is used rectally and appropriately short-term (15). ...when used intravenously. Intravenous potassium phosphate is an FDA-approved prescription drug (15).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when phosphate (expressed as phosphorus) intake exceeds the tolerable upper intake level (UL). Hyperphosphatemia, resulting in electrolyte disturbances, alterations in calcium homeostasis, and calcification of nonskeletal tissues, may occur. The UL during pregnancy is 3.5 grams daily. During lactation, the UL is 4 grams daily (7555).

(Read more about PHOSPHATE SALTS)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in doses that do not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 100 mg daily in the form of pyridoxine for adults (15,6243). ...when used parenterally and appropriately. Injectable vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) is an FDA-approved prescription product (15).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in doses of 101-200 mg daily (6243,8558).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in doses at or above 500 mg daily. High doses, especially those exceeding 1000 mg daily or total doses of 1000 grams or more, pose the most risk. However, neuropathy can occur with lower daily or total doses (6243,8195). ...when used intramuscularly in high doses and frequency due to potential for rhabdomyolysis (90795).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in doses that do not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of vitamin B6 in the form of pyridoxine 30 mg daily for children aged 1-3 years, 40 mg daily for 4-8 years, 60 mg daily for 9-13 years, and 80 mg daily for 14-18 years (6243).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in amounts exceeding the recommended dietary allowance (5049,8579,107124,107125,107135).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses, long-term (6243).

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. A special sustained-release product providing vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 75 mg daily is FDA-approved for use in pregnancy. Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) is also considered a first-line treatment for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (111601). However, it should not be used long-term or without medical supervision and close monitoring. The tolerable upper intake level (UL) refers to vitamin B6 in the form of pyridoxine and is 80 mg daily for those aged 14-18 years and 100 mg daily for 19 years and older (6243).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. There is some concern that high-dose maternal vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) can cause neonatal seizures (4609,6397,8197).

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in doses not exceeding the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of vitamin B6 in the form of pyridoxine 80 mg daily for those aged 14-18 years and 100 mg daily for those 19 years and older. The recommended dietary allowance (RDA) in lactating women is 2 mg daily (6243). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of vitamin B6 when used in higher doses in breast-feeding women.

(Read more about VITAMIN B6)

ALUMINUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium citrate might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity. Other types of calcium do not increase aluminum absorption.  Details Calcium citrate can increase the absorption of aluminum when taken with aluminum hydroxide. The increase in aluminum levels may become toxic, particularly in individuals with kidney disease (21631). However, the effect of calcium citrate on aluminum absorption is due to the citrate anion rather than calcium cation. Calcium acetate does not appear to increase aluminum absorption (93006).

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.  Details Advise patients to take bisphosphonates at least 30 minutes before calcium, but preferably at a different time of day. Calcium supplements decrease absorption of bisphosphonates (12937).

CALCIPOTRIENE (Dovonex) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Taking calcipotriene with calcium might increase the risk for hypercalcemia.  Details Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (12938). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with calcium supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Intravenous calcium may decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers; oral calcium is unlikely to have this effect.  Details Intravenous calcium is used to decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers in the management of overdose. Intravenous calcium gluconate has been used before intravenous verapamil (Isoptin) to prevent or reduce the hypotensive effects without affecting the antiarrhythmic effects (6124). But there is no evidence that dietary or supplemental calcium when taken orally interacts with calcium channel blockers (12939,12947).

CEFTRIAXONE (Rocephin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Co-administration of intravenous calcium and ceftriaxone can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys.  Details Avoid administering intravenous calcium in any form, such as parenteral nutrition or Lactated Ringers, within 48 hours of intravenous ceftriaxone. Case reports in neonates show that administering intravenous ceftriaxone and calcium can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys. In several cases, neonates have died as a result of this interaction (15794,21632). So far there are no reports in adults; however, there is still concern that this interaction might occur in adults.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Using intravenous calcium with digoxin might increase the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias.  Details Hypercalcemia increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with digoxin (12940). However, one retrospective analysis of clinical data suggests that intravenous calcium does not increase the risk of dysrhythmias or mortality in patients receiving digoxin (38960).

DILTIAZEM (Cardizem, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, calcium might increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of diltiazem.

DOLUTEGRAVIR (Tivicay) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of dolutegravir.  Details Advise patients to take dolutegravir either 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium carbonate 1200 mg concomitantly with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces plasma levels of dolutegravir by almost 40%. Calcium appears to decrease levels of dolutegravir through chelation (93578).

ELVITEGRAVIR (Vitekta) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of elvitegravir.  Details Advise patients to take elvitegravir either 2 hours before or 2 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium along with elvitegravir can reduce blood levels of elvitegravir through chelation (94166).

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption and effectiveness of levothyroxine.  Details Advise patients to take levothyroxine and calcium supplements at least 4 hours apart. Calcium reduces levothyroxine absorption, probably by forming insoluble complexes (5082). Calcium carbonate supplements reduce effectiveness of levothyroxine in patients with hypothyroidism (5081,5082,6137).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use of calcium and lithium may increase this risk of hypercalcemia.  Details Clinical research suggests that long-term use of lithium may cause hypercalcemia in 10% to 60% of patients (38953). Theoretically, concomitant use of lithium and calcium supplements may further increase this risk.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of quinolone antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral quinolones at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements or calcium-fortified foods. Taking calcium at the same time as oral quinolones can reduce quinolone absorption. Calcium binds to quinolones in the gut (4412,10339,21638,38570).

RALTEGRAVIR (Isentress) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium may reduce levels of raltegravir.  Details Pharmacokinetic research shows that taking a single dose of calcium carbonate 3000 mg along with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily modestly decreases the mean area under the curve of raltegravir, but the decrease does not necessitate a dose adjustment of raltegravir (94164). However, a case of elevated HIV-1 RNA levels and documented resistance to raltegravir has been reported for a patient taking calcium carbonate 1 gram three times daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU three times daily in combination with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 11 months. It is thought that calcium reduced raltegravir levels by chelation, leading to treatment failure (94165).

SOTALOL (Betapace) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of sotalol.  Details Advise patients to separate doses by at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium. Calcium appears to reduce the absorption of sotalol, probably by forming insoluble complexes (10018).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral tetracyclines at least 2 hours before, or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements. Taking calcium at the same time as oral tetracyclines can reduce tetracycline absorption. Calcium binds to tetracyclines in the gut (1843).

THIAZIDE DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Taking calcium along with thiazides might increase the risk of hypercalcemia and renal failure.  Details Thiazides reduce calcium excretion by the kidneys (1902). Using thiazides along with moderately large amounts of calcium carbonate increases the risk of milk-alkali syndrome (hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis, renal failure). Patients may need to have their serum calcium levels and/or parathyroid function monitored regularly.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, use of calcium supplements may increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of verapamil.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking phosphate salts with bisphosphonates might increase the risk of hypocalcemia.  Details Combining bisphosphonates and phosphate can cause hypocalcemia. In one report, hypocalcemic tetany developed in a patient taking alendronate (Fosamax) who received a large dose of phosphate salts as a pre-operative laxative (14589).

ERDAFITINIB (Balversa) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = A Taking erdafitinib with phosphate salts increases the risk of hyperphosphatemia.  Details Erdafitinib increases phosphate levels. It is recommended that patients taking erdafitinib restrict phosphate intake to no more than 600-800 mg daily (104470).

FUTIBATINIB (Lytgobi) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = A Taking futibatinib with phosphate salts increases the risk of hyperphosphatemia.  Details Futibatinib can cause hyperphosphatemia, as reported in 88% of patients in clinical studies. In addition, 77% of patients in clinical studies required use of a phosphate binder to manage hyperphosphatemia. Phosphate salts should generally be avoided by people taking this medication (112912).

(Read more about PHOSPHATE SALTS)

AMIODARONE (Cordarone) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, vitamin B6 might increase the photosensitivity caused by amiodarone.  Details Despite initial case reports suggesting that pyridoxine may have a protective effect against amiodarone-induced photosensitivity, preliminary clinical research suggests that pyridoxine may actually exacerbate this adverse effect (8892,8893).

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, vitamin B6 may have additive effects when used with antihypertensive drugs.  Details Research in hypertensive rats shows that vitamin B6 can decrease systolic blood pressure (30859,82959,83093). Similarly, clinical research in patients with hypertension shows that taking high doses of vitamin B6 may reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure, possibly by reducing plasma levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine (83091).

LEVODOPA Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Vitamin B6 may increase the metabolism of levodopa when taken alone, but not when taken in conjunction with carbidopa.  Details Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) enhances the metabolism of levodopa, reducing its clinical effects. However, this interaction does not occur when carbidopa is used concurrently with levodopa (Sinemet). Therefore, it is not likely to be a problem in most people (3046).

PHENOBARBITAL (Luminal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D High doses of vitamin B6 may reduce the levels and clinical effects of phenobarbital.  Details Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that vitamin B6 200 mg daily can reduce plasma levels of phenobarbital, possibly by increasing metabolism. It is not known whether lower doses have any effect. Advise people taking phenobarbital to avoid high doses of vitamin B6 (3046,10801).

PHENYTOIN (Dilantin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D High doses of vitamin B6 may reduce the levels and clinical effects of phenytoin.  Details Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that vitamin B6 200 mg daily can reduce plasma levels of phenytoin, possibly by increasing metabolism. It is not known whether lower doses have any effect. Advise people taking phenytoin to avoid high doses of vitamin B6 (3046,10801).

(Read more about VITAMIN B6)

General ...Orally and intravenously, calcium is well-tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Belching, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, and stomach upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about calciphylaxis and kidney stones.

Cardiovascular ...There has been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these results, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and CVD, CHD, or MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482). To minimize the possible risk of CVD, CHD, or MI, advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). While dietary intake of calcium is preferred over supplemental intake, advise patients who require calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D, as this combination does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI (93533).
Rarely, calcium intake can increase the risk of calciphylaxis, which usually occurs in patients with kidney failure. Calciphylaxis is the deposition of calcium phosphate in arterioles, which causes skin ulcers and skin necrosis. In a case report, a 64-year-old female with a history of neck fracture, sepsis, and ischemic colitis presented with painful leg ulcers due to calciphylaxis. She discontinued calcium and vitamin D supplementation and was treated with sodium thiosulfate and supportive care (95816).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, calcium can cause belching, flatulence, nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, and diarrhea (1824,1843,12950,38803). Although constipation is frequently cited as an adverse effect of calcium, there is no scientific substantiation of this side effect (1824,1843,1844,1845,12950,38978). Calcium carbonate has been reported to cause acid rebound, but this is controversial (12935,12936).

Oncologic ...There is some concern that very high doses of calcium might increase the risk of prostate cancer. Some epidemiological evidence suggests that consuming over 2000 mg/day of dietary calcium might increase the risk for prostate cancer (4825,12949). Additional research suggests that calcium intake over 1500 mg/day might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer and prostate cancer mortality (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a small increase in prostate cancer risk (98894). However, contradictory research suggests no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall prostate cancer risk (14131,14132,104630). More evidence is needed to determine the effect of calcium, if any, on prostate cancer risk.

Renal ...Kidney stones have been reported in individuals taking calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily in combination with vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 4 years (93943).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

General ...Orally, intravenously, and rectally, phosphate salts are generally well tolerated when used appropriately and/or as prescribed.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, anal irritation, bloating, diarrhea, headache, gastrointestinal irritation, hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia, malaise, nausea, sleep disturbance, and vomiting.
Rectally: Hyperphosphatemia and hypocalcemia.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Extraskeletal calcification.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, a case of allergic acute coronary syndrome e., Kounis syndrome) is reported in a 43-year-old female after ingesting a specific sodium phosphate laxative product (Travad oral). She presented with maculopapular rash that progressed to anaphylaxis and a non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. The patient recovered after hospitalization for 3 days with medical management (112894).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, phosphate salts can cause gastrointestinal irritation, nausea, abdominal pain, bloating, anal irritation, and vomiting (15,2494,2495,2496,2497,93846,93848,93850,93851,93853,107008). Sodium and potassium phosphates can cause diarrhea (15). Aluminum phosphate can cause constipation (15). A large comparative study shows that, when taken orally as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy, sodium phosphate is associated with gastric mucosal lesions in about 4% of patients (93868).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, phosphate salts can commonly cause malaise (93846). Headaches and sleep disturbance may also occur (93848,93851).

Renal ...Orally, use of sodium phosphate for bowel cleansing has been associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury in some patients (93863). However, a pooled analysis of clinical research suggests that results are not consistent for all patients (93864). Some evidence suggests that female gender, probably due to lower body weight, iron-deficiency anemia, dehydration, and chronic kidney disease are all associated with an increased risk of sodium phosphate-induced kidney dysfunction (93865).

Other ...Orally, phosphate salts can cause fluid and electrolyte disturbances including hyperphosphatemia and hypocalcemia, and extraskeletal calcification. Potassium phosphates can cause hyperkalemia. Sodium phosphates can cause hypernatremia and hypokalemia (15,2494,2495,2496,2497,107008).
Rectally, phosphate salts can cause fluid and electrolyte disturbances including hyperphosphatemia and hypocalcemia (15,112922).
Deaths related to intake of oral or rectal phosphate salts are rare and most have occurred in infants and are related to overdose (93866). However, death has also been reported in elderly patients using sodium phosphate enemas, mainly at standard doses of 250 mL (93867).

(Read more about PHOSPHATE SALTS)

General ...Orally or by injection, vitamin B6 is well tolerated in doses less than 100 mg daily.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally or by injection: Abdominal pain, allergic reactions, headache, heartburn, loss of appetite, nausea, somnolence, vomiting.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally or by injection: Sensory neuropathy (high doses).

Dermatologic ...Orally, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) has been linked to reports of skin and other allergic reactions and photosensitivity (8195,9479,90375). High-dose vitamin B6 (80 mg daily as pyridoxine) and vitamin B12 (20 mcg daily) have been associated with cases of rosacea fulminans characterized by intense erythema with nodules, papules, and pustules. Symptoms may persist for up to 4 months after the supplement is stopped, and may require treatment with systemic corticosteroids and topical therapy (10998).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally or by injection, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) can cause nausea, vomiting, heartburn, abdominal pain, mild diarrhea, and loss of appetite (8195,9479,16306,83064,83103,107124,107127,107135). In a clinical trial, one patient experienced infectious gastroenteritis that was deemed possibly related to taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) orally up to 20 mg/kg daily (90796). One small case-control study has raised concern that long-term dietary vitamin B6 intake in amounts ranging from 3.56-6.59 mg daily can increase the risk of ulcerative colitis (3350).

Hematologic ...Orally or by injection, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) can cause decreased serum folic acid concentrations (8195,9479). One case of persistent bleeding of unknown origin has been reported in a clinical trial for a patient who used vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 100 mg twice daily on days 16 to 35 of the menstrual cycle (83103). It is unclear if this effect was due to vitamin B6 intake.

Musculoskeletal ...Orally or by injection, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) can cause breast soreness or enlargement (8195).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally or by injection, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) can cause headache, paresthesia, and somnolence (8195,9479,16306). Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) can also cause sensory neuropathy, which is related to daily dose and duration of intake. Doses exceeding 1000 mg daily or total doses of 1000 grams or more pose the most risk, although neuropathy can occur with lower daily or total doses as well (8195). The mechanism of the neurotoxicity is unknown, but is thought to occur when the liver's capacity to phosphorylate pyridoxine via the active coenzyme pyridoxal phosphate is exceeded (8204). Some researchers recommend taking vitamin B6 as pyridoxal phosphate to avoid pyridoxine neuropathy, but its safety is unknown (8204). Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) neuropathy is characterized by numbness and impairment of the sense of position and vibration of the distal limbs, and a gradual progressive sensory ataxia (8196,10439). The syndrome is usually reversible with discontinuation of pyridoxine at the first appearance of neurologic symptoms. Residual symptoms have been reported in patients taking more than 2 grams daily for extended periods (8195,8196). Daily doses of 100 mg or less are unlikely to cause these problems (3094).

Oncologic ...In females, population research has found that a median intake of vitamin B6 1. 63 mg daily is associated with a 3.6-fold increased risk of rectal cancer when compared with a median intake of 1.05 mg daily (83024). A post-hoc subgroup analysis of results from clinical research in adults with a history of recent stroke or ischemic attack suggests that taking folic acid, vitamin B12, and vitamin B6 does not increase cancer risk overall, although it was associated with an increased risk of cancer in patients who also had diabetes (90378). Also, in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, population research has found that consuming at least 8.6 mg daily of supplemental vitamin B6 during treatment was associated with a lower overall survival rate over 5 years, as well as a reduced progression-free survival, when compared with non-users and those with intakes of up to 8.6 mg daily (107134).

(Read more about VITAMIN B6)