POW Berry-Melon Fizz [Discontinued] by EBOOST

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Depression. Oral 5-HTP seems to improve symptoms of depression. Details: A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research shows that taking 5-HTP for up to 8 weeks might improve symptoms of depression in some patients. The pooled remission rate across 13 studies was 65%, and the pooled effect size across 7 studies assessing the change in depressive symptom scores from baseline was large (102854). In most studies, the dose of 5-HTP administered ranged from 150-800 mg daily, although doses as high as 3 grams daily have been used (903,30000,30125,30138,102854). Some research has compared 5-HTP to conventional antidepressants. In one clinical trial of adults experiencing a first episode of depression, taking 5-HTP orally, titrated up to a daily dose of 400 mg, decreased depression symptoms similarly to fluoxetine titrated up to 40 mg daily (30112). Limited research also suggests that taking 5-HTP 300-800 mg daily seems to work similarly to fluvoxamine 50 mg (2203) or imipramine 150 mg daily (30125). Adding 5-HTP 300 mg orally daily to clomipramine 50 mg daily for 28 days has also been shown to reduce depressive symptoms when compared with clomipramine alone (6245).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Down syndrome. Oral 5-HTP does not seem to improve muscle tone or cognitive skills in patients with this condition. Details: Although early reports suggested that 5-HTP might improve muscle tone and activity levels in infants with Down syndrome (88172), other research has shown no benefit. One small clinical study suggests that taking 5-HTP 0.5-5 mg/kg daily orally from early infancy until 3-4 years of age does not improve muscle tone or developmental ability scores in children with Down syndrome when compared with a control group (88173). Also, a prospective, double-blind study shows that taking 5-HTP 1-2 mg/kg daily orally, alone or with pyridoxine 5-10 mg/kg daily orally, beginning at birth and continuing until 3 years of age, does not improve muscle tone or development of cognitive, social, or language skills when compared with placebo (30153).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. Oral 5-HTP has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a food supplement containing 5-HTP 5 mg, phenylalanine 300 mg, and glutamine 150 mg daily for 40 days during alcohol detoxification therapy reduces withdrawal symptoms when compared with alcohol detoxification therapy alone (30100). However, taking a combination of 5-HTP 25-100 mg with carbidopa 25 mg four times daily for one year does not seem to improve alcohol abstinence rates when compared with placebo (30007). The effect of 5-HTP alone is unclear.
• Alzheimer disease. Although there has been interest in using oral 5-HTP for Alzheimer disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of 5-HTP for this condition.
• Anxiety. It is unclear if oral 5-HTP is beneficial in patients with anxiety disorders. Details: A small clinical study in people with anxiety disorders shows that taking 5-HTP 25-150 mg daily with carbidopa 150 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces anxiety when compared with baseline, but not when compared with clomipramine 25-150 mg daily (30124).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although there is interest in using oral 5-HTP for ADHD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of 5-HTP for this condition.
• Cerebellar ataxia. It is unclear if oral 5-HTP reduces cerebellar ataxia symptoms. Details: One small clinical trial in people with cerebellar ataxia of various etiologies shows taking 5-HTP orally 10 mg/kg daily for 4 months improve quantitative ataxia scores when compared with placebo. Further improvement was noted in subjects continuing treatment for another 8 months (916). However, in a subsequent trial in this population, taking 5-HTP orally 1 gram daily for 10 months did not improve symptom scores when compared with placebo (30164). Also, a small clinical study in people with Friedreich's ataxia shows that taking 5-HTP 200-300 mg daily for 1 month, then 600-900 mg daily for 5 months (depending on body weight), does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (30165).
• Fibromyalgia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral 5-HTP may improve symptoms of primary fibromyalgia syndrome. Details: Small clinical studies in people with primary fibromyalgia syndrome suggest that taking 5-HTP 100 mg orally three times daily for 30-90 days might improve pain, tenderness, sleep, anxiety, fatigue, and morning stiffness when compared with baseline or placebo (913,10286).
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is unclear if oral 5-HTP is beneficial for IBD. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with stable IBD and fatigue shows that taking a specific 5-HTP (Levotonine, Panpharma) 100 mg orally twice daily for 8 weeks does not improve fatigue scores when compared with placebo. However, the validity of this study is limited by high patient drop-out (111311).
• Menopausal symptoms. It is unclear if oral 5-HTP is beneficial for symptoms of menopause. Details: A small clinical study in postmenopausal patients shows that taking 5-HTP orally 50 mg three times daily for 4 weeks does not reduce hot flash frequency when compared with placebo (30061).
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if oral 5-HTP reduces frequency of migraines. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking 5-HTP 600 mg daily decreases migraine attack frequency similarly to methysergide 3 mg daily (30129). However, other small clinical studies show that taking 5-HTP 400 mg daily does not reduce the frequency or severity of migraine attacks when compared with placebo (30130,30184). Also, in children 6-12 years of age, one very small clinical study shows that taking 5-HTP 5 mg/kg daily in 3 divided doses for 12 weeks does not reduce the frequency or severity of migraine attacks when compared with placebo (30128).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral 5-HTP is beneficial in for weight loss. Details: Some very small clinical studies show that taking 5-HTP orally, 300 mg three times daily 30 minutes before meals for 2-12 weeks, improves early satiety and decreases daily caloric intake in females with obesity when compared with placebo (914,30018). 5-HTP was also associated with a mean weight loss of 1.7 kg over 6 weeks when caloric intake was not restricted, and a mean weight loss of 3.3 kg over 6 weeks when caloric intake was restricted to about 1200 calories daily (914,30114). In moderately overweight adults with type 2 diabetes, taking 5-HTP 250 mg three times daily 30 minutes before meals for 2 weeks reduces caloric intake by about 22% and decreases body weight by about 2 kg when compared to baseline (30175).
• Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). It is unclear if oral 5-HTP is beneficial in patients with OCD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with moderate to severe OCD shows that adding 5-HTP 200 mg orally daily to fluoxetine, titrated up to 60 mg daily, for 12 weeks reduces symptom severity when compared with placebo and fluoxetine. A complete response, defined as greater than or equal to 35% improvement in overall Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score, was seen in 54% of those taking 5-HTP at week 12, compared with only 12% of those taking placebo (104250). These results were not observed until week 12, which indicates that a longer treatment period may be needed to see the full effects of the intervention.
• Opioid withdrawal. Oral 5-HTP has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in Chinese males undergoing detoxification for heroin addiction shows that taking 5-HTP 200 mg orally daily for 6 days, in combination with tyrosine, phosphatidylcholine, and L-glutamine, might reduce insomnia and withdrawal symptoms and improve mood when compared with a control group (88178).
• Panic disorder. It is unclear if intravenous 5-HTP is beneficial for reducing anxiety in panic disorder. Details: A small clinical trial in females with panic disorders shows that receiving an intravenous (IV) infusion of 5-HTP, 60 mg over 30 minutes after premedication with carbidopa 100 mg orally, does not appear to reduce anxiety when compared with control (30093).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral 5-HTP is beneficial for improving Parkinson disease symptoms. Details: Two preliminary clinical trials show that taking 5-HTP 50 mg daily for 1 month seems to improve levodopa-induced dyskinesia and symptoms of depression, but not motor functioning or apathy, when compared with placebo in patients with Parkinson disease (102853,104251). Both studies used a crossover design to correct for the small sample size, but may still have been inadequately powered to detect small changes in these outcomes. However, in another study, taking larger doses of 5-HTP, 275-1500 mg orally daily along with carbidopa 150-1000 mg daily for up to 38 days, worsened rigidity, bradykinesia, and functional disability (30140). Other research has evaluated 5-HTP in patients with Parkinson disease and REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). A small crossover study in these patients shows taking oral 5-HTP 50 mg daily for 4 weeks does not improve the percentage of REM sleep without atonia or the frequency of RBD events when compared with baseline or placebo. Patients taking 5-HTP report modest improvements in part II (motor function; e.g. swallowing, walking, and dressing) of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), but not other parts of the UPDRS, when compared with placebo (107793). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Although there is interest in using oral 5-HTP for PMS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of 5-HTP for this condition.
• Seizures. Although there is interest in using oral 5-HTP for seizures, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of 5-HTP for this condition.
• Tension headache. It is unclear if oral 5-HTP reduces tension headache severity. Details: A small clinical study in adults with a history of chronic tension headaches suggests that taking 5-HTP 100 mg three times daily for 8 weeks does not reduce pain intensity or the number of days with headache when compared with placebo (2204).
• Tinnitus. Oral 5-HTP has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Research has evaluated a specific capsule formulation (Tinnitan Duo; Laboratorios Salvat) containing 5-HTP, ginkgo extract, magnesium, melatonin, pantothenic acid, vitamin B6, and zinc at undeclared doses. A small clinical trial in patients with subjective tinnitus shows taking this product as one capsule twice daily for 3 months improves Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) total score and THI emotional subscale score at 3 months when compared with baseline. Patients also report improvement in tinnitus-related distress (107792). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of randomization and placebo-control; additionally, it is unclear if any effects are due to 5-HTP, other ingredients, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate 5-HTP for these uses.

(Read more about 5-HTP)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral beet may improve athletic performance associated with aerobic activities. However, it is not clear who is most likely to benefit, for which type of competition it is most useful, or what dose or duration of use is most appropriate. Details: Several small clinical trials, most of which enrolled elite athletes, recreational athletes, and sedentary males, as well as meta-analyses of some of these and other studies, show that beet improves various measures of athletic performance, including ability, muscular endurance, power output, sprinting, and strength (93844,94464,94468,94469,100143,100150,100152,105761,113422). Clinical research also shows that drinking beetroot juice improves the use of oxygen during exercise testing in recreationally-trained athletes, especially with severe exercise testing (94460,94463,94467,100147,105762). Also, in obese adolescents, taking beetroot juice daily for 6 days increases the time to exhaustion from severe exercise, but does not improve moderate exercise (100145). Not all research shows that beet supplementation benefits athletic performance. Another meta-analysis of several small clinical studies, including some of the studies above, shows that taking beetroot does not improve performance in high-intensity or sprint interval training (111159). Additionally, the majority of research in elite athletes does not support the use of beetroot juice to decrease the time needed to complete a task, aid in some sort of graded exercise test, or improve the use of oxygen during exercise testing (94455,94458,94460,94461,94464,94465,94466,94469,94473,100142,100153,105763). The supposed lack of effect of beetroot juice in elite athletes might be related to the natural production of nitrates and nitrites in the body or the increased ability to use oxygen that comes from extensive training (94458,94463). Alternatively, any changes might be very small (<1%) and not identified with statistical comparisons, although even very small changes might be beneficial in competition (94464). The most commonly used doses in all studies, regardless of effect, have included an acute dose of beetroot juice 70-500 mL up to 3 hours prior to exercise (93844,94463,94464,94466,94467,94473,97726,100142,100143,105761)(105762,111159,113422) or chronic dosing of up to 500 mL daily for 3-6 days (94459,94464,94469,100145,100147,100153,111159,113422). Less commonly, beetroot juice 70-140 mL daily, betalain-rich concentrate 100 mg daily, or a beetroot-based nutritional gel 100 grams daily, have been taken for longer dosing schedules of 7-15 days (97720,100144,100148,100152,105763,113422). Benefits in elite athletes, most often related to time trials, are usually limited to studies using chronic dosing of 7-15 days, which is longer than the duration of 6 days used in the majority of studies (94473,97720,100144,100148). Brands of juice used in clinical trials have included Beet It Sport (James White Drinks Ltd.) (94455,94458,94465,100142,100143,100144,100148,105761,105763), Beet It Stamina Shot (James White Drinks Ltd.) (93844), Beet It (James White Drinks Ltd) (94457,94459,94460,94467,94469,97726,100145,100153,105762,111159), and Love Beets Beetroot Juice (Gs Fresh Ltd.) (94461,94462). Although plasma levels have not been analyzed in all studies, the majority of studies suggest that these doses are adequate to increase levels of nitrates or nitrites, which is thought to be essential for increasing athletic potential (93844,94455,94458,94459,94460,94465,94467,94469,94466,94473,97726). The evidence also suggests benefit in both normoxic and hypoxic environments (94465,100148,105763).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Drinking beetroot juice 7-8 times over 48 hours after strenuous exercise may reduce exercise-induced muscle soreness, but evidence is conflicting. Details: Some clinical research shows drinking beetroot juice (Love Beets Beetroot Juice, Gs Fresh Ltd.) 125 mL or 250 mL seven times over 48 hours after strenuous box jumps improves muscle soreness when compared with placebo and sodium nitrite (96964,97722). Other small clinical studies show that drinking beetroot juice 50-250 mL as eight separate doses over 48 hours after strenuous exerciseimproves muscle soreness and reduces tissue edema when compared with placebo (94461,113424). However, drinking beetroot juice 250 mL as seven separate doses over 48 hours after running a marathon does not appear to reduce muscle soreness when compared with placebo (94462). A meta-analysis of 4 small studies, mostly in healthy or physically active males, shows that drinking beetroot juice improves the pressure pain threshold, which is a measure of muscle soreness, at 48- and 72-hours post-exercise when compared with a fruit-flavored drink. However, beetroot juice does not improve subjective muscle soreness scores (111160). The validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the beetroot juice regimens among the included studies. Further, these results should not be generalized to elite athletes.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Drinking beetroot juice for up to 14 days may not improve exercise capacity in patients with COPD. Details: A meta-analysis of eight small clinical trials in patients with COPD shows that taking nitrate-rich beetroot juice does not improve most measures of exercise capacity, including the 6-minute walk test, cycling ergometry endurance time, and maximum rate of oxygen consumption (VO2 max), when compared with placebo. Additionally, beetroot juice did not reduce blood pressure or heart rate. However, the analysis did show a significant improvement in scores on the Borg Rating of Perceived Exhaustion scale with beetroot juice over placebo. Nitrate-rich beetroot juice doses ranged from 70-140 mL daily for up to 14 days (104200).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Cognitive function. It is unclear if drinking beetroot juice is beneficial for cognitive function. Details: A small clinical study in adults with overweight or obesity on a calorie-restricted diet shows that drinking 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice daily for 14 days improves the time to complete part B of the trail making test, which is a test of cognitive function, but not part A, when compared with controls (111158). However, the duration and size of this study limits its validity. Further, it is unclear whether any improvement is clinically significant. The effect of acute beet administration on cognitive function has also been studied. A very small clinical study in healthy adults shows that taking beet extract (RedNite, Enovate Biolife) chewable tablets 3 grams 90 minutes prior to neuropsychological testing improves immediate and delayed memory capacity, frontal lobe function, and lexical flexibility but does not improve working memory, information processing speed, or subjective reports of memory performance when compared with placebo (113427).
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). It is unclear if oral beetroot extract is beneficial in patients with CHD. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with CHD shows that taking red beetroot extract 500 mg, containing around 25 mg betalains, twice daily for 2 weeks reduces total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 15 mg/dL and reduces triglycerides by 8 mg/dL when compared to baseline. Slight improvements in blood pressure and blood glucose were also reported, but these changes were not clinically significant (103883). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Also, it is unclear whether beetroot can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with CHD.
• Dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral beetroot is beneficial in patients with dyslipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in healthy individuals or patients with dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease, or overweight or obesity, shows that consuming beetroot juice or leaves does not improve levels of triglycerides or total, low-density lipoprotein, or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol when compared with controls (111163). However, the validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the enrolled patients and beetroot regimens.
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice improves recovery from muscle damage after exercise. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 small clinical studies in healthy or physically active individuals, most of which enrolled males only, shows that drinking beetroot juice improves measures of muscle recovery at 72 hours post-exercise when compared with a fruit-flavored drink. However, beetroot juice does not consistently improve recovery at earlier time points post-exercise, nor does it reduce levels of creatine kinase or markers of inflammation (i.e., interleukin-6, interleukin-8, c-reactive protein, or tumor necrosis factor-alpha) (111160). However, the validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the beetroot juice regimens among the included studies, which usually varied from 210-250 mg of nitrate in 7-11 servings over 3-7 days. Further, these results should not be generalized to elite athletes. Another very small clinical study in semi-professional female athletes shows that ingesting beetroot juice 50 mL 8 times over 48 hours after exercise-induced muscle damage enhances the recovery of some functional parameters such as muscle endurance but not others such as flexibility and vertical jump performance when compared with placebo (113424).
• Hypertension. Oral beet may slightly reduce blood pressure in healthy individuals, but it is unclear if it is beneficial in patients with hypertension. Details: Meta-analyses of small studies show the potential for a minor reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in healthy adults taking beetroot juice (94470,97718,97728). The average reduction in SBP and DBP with beetroot juice consumption is about 4 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, which is greater than the effect seen with consuming blackcurrant juice or nitrate-depleted beetroot juice. The most benefit is seen when beetroot juice is taken for at least 2 weeks or at doses of 500 mL daily (97728). The effect of acute beet supplementation on blood pressure is conflicting. A small clinical study in healthy adults shows that drinking beet juice (Beet It, James White Company) 140 mL two hours prior to cardiovascular measurements reduces resting SBP by about 4 mmHg but does not improve resting or post-exercise DBP, central blood pressure, or arterial stiffness nor does it improve post-exercise SBP when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis suggests that the reductions in resting SBP were only observed in males, not females (113423). Another small clinical study shows that consuming beet 100 grams baked into bread modestly decreases DBP over a 6-hour period when compared with white bread (97725). It is possible that genetics might play a role in the magnitude of effect seen with beetroot consumption. Adults with a specific gene polymorphism, eNOS Glu298Asp, experienced a greater reduction in DBP after consuming beet-containing bread (97724). Despite positive findings in studies of healthy individuals, research on the use of beetroot juice in patients with hypertension is unclear. A small clinical study in adults with hypertension who were taking antihypertensive medications shows that drinking nitrate-rich beetroot juice (Beet it; James White Drinks Ltd.) 70 mL twice daily for one week does not lower blood pressure when compared with nitrate-depleted beetroot juice (94457). Also, in patients with mild to moderate hypertension, clinical research shows that taking a combination of beetroot powder (Sensient) 300 mg, olive leaf extract 1000 mg, and green coffee bean extract 200 mg daily for 6 weeks does not lower blood pressure when compared with placebo (97723). However, some evidence suggests that at least part of the blood pressure lowering effects of beet might be independent of nitrate (97728). Furthermore, some research suggests that identifying effects on blood pressure might be dependent on the method of measurement, including clinic resting measurements, 24-hour monitoring, or morning/evening home resting measurements (97729).
• Hypertriglyceridemia. It is unclear if oral beet is beneficial in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Details: A small clinical study in overweight or obese individuals with dyslipidemia shows that taking freeze-dried beet leaf 2.8 grams daily for 4 weeks in addition to nutritional guidance does not lower triglyceride levels when compared with nutritional guidance alone (100146). Beet has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical trial in patients at risk for heart disease shows that a specific combination of beet and hawthorn berry (Neo40-Daily, Neogenis Labs), taken twice daily for 30 days, can modestly reduce blood triglyceride levels when compared to baseline (18222). It is unclear if these findings are due to beet, hawthorn berry, or the combination.
• Liver disease. Although there has been interest in using oral beet for liver disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of beet for this purpose.
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial for muscle strength. Details: A meta-analysis of 18 clinical studies in healthy males shows that taking beetroot juice or beetroot gel 2-3 hours before exercise improves muscular strength when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis suggests that beetroot-based supplements improve muscular strength in a fatigued but not resting state (113422). A small clinical study in adults with overweight or obesity on a calorie-restricted diet shows that drinking 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice daily for 14 days improves handgrip strength by approximately 18% compared with 4% in controls (111158). However, it is unclear whether any improvement is clinically significant.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral beet leaf or beetroot juice is beneficial for weight loss. Details: A small clinical study in patients with overweight or obesity and dyslipidemia shows that taking freeze-dried beet leaf 2.8 grams daily for 4 weeks in addition to nutritional guidance does not reduce body weight or body mass index (BMI) when compared with nutritional guidance alone (100146). Similarly, a small clinical study in adults with overweight or obesity on a calorie-restricted diet shows that drinking 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice daily for 14 days does not improve weight loss when compared with controls (111158). However, the size and duration of this study may have been inadequate to detect differences between groups.
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension. Details: A small clinical trial in pregnant patients with hypertension who are at approximately 22-35 weeks gestation shows that taking beetroot juice (James White Drinks Ltd) 70 mL daily for 8 days does not reduce blood pressure when compared with a nitrate-depleted beetroot juice (100151). However, the study was small and designed to investigate the feasibility of using beetroot juice in this population.
• Pulmonary hypertension. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking beetroot juice (Beet-It Sport; James White Drinks Ltd) 70 mL twice daily for 7 days does not improve right ventricular systolic function when compared with nitrate-depleted beetroot juice in patients with pulmonary hypertension (100149). However, this study was small and not adequately powered to detect differences between groups.
• Raynaud syndrome. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial in patients with Raynaud syndrome. Details: A small clinical study in patients with Raynaud syndrome undergoing cold sensitivity tests shows that drinking beetroot juice (Beet-It, James White Drinks Ltd) 70 mL daily for 13 days, followed by 140 mL prior to testing, does not reduce pain in the hands or feet, but might improve thermal comfort in the feet, when compared to baseline (103884). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. More evidence is needed to rate beet for these uses.

(Read more about BEET)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. In some adults, taking beta-alanine appears to improve some, but not all, measures of athletic performance. Beta-alanine appears to work better for exercises that lasts at least 1 minute in duration; however, many other factors likely alter efficacy, such as the type of exercise, the subject's training experience, and the dosing regimen. Details: Many small clinical trials have evaluated the effects of beta-alanine supplementation in untrained individuals, recreational athletes, and professional athletes in a variety of sports and activities, including running, cycling, swimming, basketball, football, soccer, rowing, water polo, wrestling, weight lifting, skiing, and others. However, the results of individual trials are conflicting. Furthermore, studies have included multiple endpoints that have been both lab-based, such as time to exhaustion, strength endurance, time trials, and power output, and field-based, such as performance times (18227,94333,94334,94335,94336,94337,94338,94339,94340,94341)(94342,94343,94345,94346,94347,94348,94349,97956,97958,97960)(97962,97969,97970,97971,97972,101027,101028,101029,101030,104144)(104145,106710,106711,106713,106717,106718,112794). Meta-analyses of clinical trials show that taking beta-alanine 2-6.4 grams orally daily for 3-12 weeks provides minor improvements in exercise capacity and performance when compared with control (18227,94357,106717). In one meta-analysis, exercise capacity improved by an average of approximately 3% when compared with placebo (18227). However, meta-analyses suggest that improvements in exercise performance are less than exercise capacity (18227,94357). The majority of this research has only included males. Preliminary clinical research assessing the effect of beta-alanine on exercise capacity in females has not consistently demonstrated a benefit. However, the validity of these studies is limited by small sample sizes (14611,94338,94339,94345,97957,97967,104144,112791). Preliminary clinical research also suggests that beta-alanine is more effective for short exercises, lasting at least 1 minute. Longer exercises, lasting more than 10 minutes, have not been well studied. In addition, the type of athlete and type of exercise most likely to benefit from beta-alanine supplementation is unclear (18227,94357,106717). Pooled analyses have not identified the most effective dose of beta-alanine; however, preliminary subgroup analyses suggest that prolonged supplementation of at least 3-6 weeks may be needed to gain benefits (94357,106717). There does not seem to be a relationship between the daily beta-alanine dose and exercise-related outcomes, although one analysis suggests outcomes may be related to the total cumulative dose; most studies have used a total daily dose of 2.4-6.4 grams (18227,94357,101026,101027,101028,101029,101030,106712,106717). The majority of studies have evaluated various marketed formulations of beta-alanine (Carnosyn, Natural Alternatives International; Sustained Release Beta-Alanine, Musashi; Balance 100% unflavored pure beta-alanine, Vitaco Health; Intra X cell, Athletics Edge Nutrition) (94333,94335,94336,94337,94339,94342,94346,94347,94348,94349)(101028,101029,101030,104144,106710,106711,106718). Beta-alanine has also been studied in combination with 1 additional ingredient, namely sodium bicarbonate or creatine. Preliminary clinical research in physically active or trained males shows that taking beta-alanine 6-6.4 grams orally daily for 4-6 weeks with sodium bicarbonate 300-500 mg/kg orally daily for 1-7 days does not increase exercise capacity or exercise performance while cycling or sprinting when compared with individual supplementation (97959,97964,97966,101028). In contrast, preliminary clinical research in male athletes participating in martial arts or rowing shows that taking beta-alanine with sodium bicarbonate modestly increases exercise performance when compared with either ingredient taken alone (97962,97963). Other preliminary clinical research in healthy, untrained males shows that taking beta-alanine 1.6 grams daily for 28 days with creatine 5 grams twice daily for 22 days, followed by four times daily for 6 days, modestly increases power output during cycling when compared with placebo or taking either supplement alone (97973). In another very small clinical study in trained military males, taking beta-alanine 6.4 grams daily for 28 days with creatine 0.3 grams/kg daily for the last 7 days improves leg muscle power but not anaerobic power or muscle strength when compared with beta-alanine plus placebo (112793). Beta-alanine has also been studied in combination with multiple other ingredients. Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific product containing beta-alanine, creatine monohydrate, arginine, alpha-ketoisocaproate, and leucine (NO-Shotgun) or a different product containing beta-alanine, L-histidine, and carnosine (BETAFOR3MAX, Martinez Nieto S.A.) for 28 or 7 days, respectively, also improves strength and power output when compared with placebo (34451,106714). However, another very small crossover clinical study in healthy males shows that taking 6 mg/kg of a multi-ingredient pre-workout supplement containing beta-alanine, L-tyrosine, L-citrulline maleate, arginine alpha-ketoglutarate, L-taurine, and caffeine 30 minutes prior to weight training does not increase bench press strength endurance when compared with an equivalent amount of anhydrous caffeine (111250). It is unclear if these effects are due to beta-alanine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Physical performance. Preliminary clinical research shows that taking beta-alanine improves exercise capacity and fatigue, but not strength or exercise performance, in older adults. Details: Clinical research in older adults shows that taking beta-alanine 2.4-3.2 grams daily for 4-12 weeks increases exercise capacity and delays fatigue during exercise when compared with placebo (16442,97955,97965). In addition, preliminary clinical research in older adults shows that taking an oral nutritional supplement fortified with beta-alanine 0.8-1.2 grams twice daily for 12 weeks increases exercise capacity when compared with taking the oral nutritional supplement alone (97961). Taking beta-alanine 2.4 grams daily also minimizes the reduction of executive functioning after cycling in older adults when compared with placebo (97955). However, 2 clinical studies in older adults show that taking beta-alanine (Natural Alternatives International) 2.4-3.2 grams daily for 10-12 weeks with or without an endurance-based resistance-training program does not improve strength, power, fatigue, or performance when compared with the resistance training program alone or placebo (101031,112792).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral beta-alanine is beneficial for cognitive decline in older adults. Details: A small clinical study in older adults shows that taking beta-alanine 1200 mg twice daily for 10 weeks reduces symptoms of depression and might improve cognitive function in subjects with borderline or low cognitive function at baseline when compared with placebo. However, beta-alanine supplementation does not improve cognitive function in older adults with normal cognitive function at baseline and does not benefit mood, anxiety, or executive function when compared with placebo (112792).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral beta-alanine improves physical function in people with COPD. Details: A small clinical study in adults with COPD shows that taking beta-alanine (SR CarnoSyn, Natural Alternatives International, Inc) 800 mg four times daily for 12 weeks does not improve exercise capacity, muscle function, or physical activity when compared with placebo (112790).
• Cognitive function. Oral beta-alanine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in trained military males shows that taking beta-alanine 6.4 grams daily for 28 days with creatine 0.3 grams/kg daily for the last 7 days modestly improves mathematical processing when compared to baseline, but not when compared with beta-alanine plus placebo. However, improvement from baseline was not found in the group taking beta-alanine plus placebo (112793).
• Exercise-induced muscle breakdown. It is unclear if oral beta-alanine improves muscle recovery after exercise. Details: Preliminary clinical research in untrained adults shows that taking beta-alanine 4.8 grams orally daily for 4 weeks does not improve muscle recovery after resistance exercises when compared with placebo (101026).
• Menopausal symptoms. Although there has been interest in using oral beta-alanine for menopausal symptoms, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of beta-alanine for this purpose.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral beta-alanine improves body composition in adults. Details: A meta-analysis of several small clinical studies in active and sedentary adults shows that supplementing with beta-alanine 1.6-6.4 grams daily for 3-10 weeks does not reduce body mass, fat mass, body fat percentage, or free fat mass when compared with various controls. Subgroup analysis of dose, duration, and type of additional training did not change the results (112789).
• Sarcopenia. Although there has been interest in using oral beta-alanine for sarcopenia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of beta-alanine for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate beta-alanine for these uses.

(Read more about BETA-ALANINE)

EFFECTIVE

• Migraine headache. Oral caffeine in combination with acetaminophen, aspirin, and/or sumatriptan is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating migraine headache. Details: Taking caffeine 100-260 mg orally in combination with acetaminophen 500-2000 mg, aspirin 500 mg, and/or sumatriptan 50-100 mg is effective for treating migraine headache (2715,2716,2717,37614,37626,37816,91068). Some evidence shows that caffeine in combination with aspirin and acetaminophen may be more effective than sumatriptan in treating a migraine attack (37666). However, taking caffeine 200 mg plus ergotamine seems to be less effective than sumatriptan or calcium carbasalate plus metoclopramide (37685,38312). Caffeine is an FDA-approved product for use with analgesics for the treatment of migraine.
• Neonatal apnea. Oral or intravenous caffeine citrate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the short-term treatment of neonatal apnea in very preterm infants. Details: Using caffeine orally or intravenously improves apnea of prematurity in very preterm infants and reduces the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, invasive mechanical ventilation, and neurodevelopmental impairment (6023,6371,37857,37906,38124,38344,98807,100364,114658). The dosage approved in the FDA labeling is a single loading dose of caffeine citrate 20 mg/kg (10 mg/kg caffeine base), followed by 5 mg/kg of caffeine citrate (2.5 mg/kg caffeine base) every 24 hours for maintenance. Clinical research shows that caffeine citrate dose-dependently reduces the number of apnea episodes by at least 50% over 7-10 days of treatment (6371). Most research suggests that doses above 10 mg/kg daily reduce the risk of apnea, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and problematic extubation when compared with doses below 10 mg/kg/day (98807,100364,114658). Additional clinical research shows that reinitiating caffeine treatment after termination of the original caffeine regimen, and continuing until 40 weeks postmenstrual age, reduces the incidence of intermittent hypoxia in premature infants by 46% when compared to standard care (91073). At 18-21 months of age, a history of neonatal caffeine treatment reduces the risk of long-term complications of apnea of prematurity, such as cerebral palsy or cognitive delay (37722,38340). At 11 years of age, individuals born prematurely and treated with caffeine have improved visuomotor, visuoperceptual, and visuospatial abilities when compared to those who received placebo (97452). At 6-11 years of age, these individuals may also have a reduced risk of motor impairment (114658). Data on the prophylactic use of caffeine in very low birth-weight infants (less than 1500 grams and 32 weeks' gestation) are conflicting. In a meta-analysis of 11 studies, 5 show a reduced risk of apnea of prematurity, oxygen therapy, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, patent ductus arteriosus, and retinopathy of prematurity, and a reduced duration of mechanical ventilation (111491). However, other studies do not show any benefit (38125,111491). A study of infants born at 34-36 weeks' gestation shows that caffeine citrate, 10 or 20 mg/kg orally daily, reduces the number of intermittent hypoxemia episodes per hour by 61% and 67% respectively, when compared with placebo (111493). Caffeine and aminophylline have similar effectiveness for management of apnea, bradycardia, and hypoxemia, but caffeine has a wider range of safe plasma levels and lower rates of tachycardia and feeding intolerance (111492).
• Postoperative headache. Oral or intravenous caffeine is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing headache in postoperative patients who regularly consume caffeinated products. Details: Clinical research shows that using caffeine is effective for preventing postoperative headache in patients who regularly consume caffeinated products. Intravenous caffeine does not seem to be effective in non-regular caffeine consumers. Studied doses have included 200 mg intravenously or oral doses calculated based on average daily consumption (2725,2726). Caffeine is an FDA-approved product for preventing headache in postoperative patients who regularly consume caffeinated products.
• Tension headache. Oral caffeine in combination with analgesics is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating tension headache. Details: Taking caffeine orally in combination with analgesics is effective for treating simple tension headache. Taking caffeine 100 mg alone is more effective at reducing tension headache pain when compared with placebo, but less effective than the combination of caffeine and analgesics. Caffeine 130 mg has been used with acetaminophen 1000 mg or with acetaminophen 500 mg and aspirin 500 mg. Caffeine 50 mg has been used with acetylsalicylic acid 250 mg and acetaminophen 200 mg (2718,11832,37668,37773).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral caffeine taken as a single dose of at least 2-3 mg/kg can modestly improve endurance, muscle strength, power output, and overall athletic performance when taken prior to certain forms of athletic activity or exercise. However, the magnitude and duration of effect is variable and may be dependent on the form and dose of caffeine, as well as various individual- and activity-specific factors. Caffeine intake in excess of 800 mg daily can result in blood levels greater than those allowed by the National Collegiate Athletic Association. Details: Clinical research and meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking caffeine 2-10 mg/kg modestly improves work produced, aerobic endurance, muscle strength and endurance, power output, and overall athletic performance (10203,11832,37648,37894,38054,38063,95955,100362,100365,100371)(103701,103703,108798,111250,114655,114657,114661,114673). According to the International Society of Sports Nutrition, the most consistent and measurable effects are seen in aerobic endurance; the minimal effective dose for any form of exercise is unclear, but benefits have been most consistent at doses of 3-6 mg/kg (114673). Meta-analyses of studies using caffeine 3-9 mg/kg as a single dose prior to endurance time trials report variability in results. Sports studied included running, rowing, cycling, swimming, and Nordic skiing, and included both recreational and trained athletes. Overall there was a small positive effect on time to exhaustion, endurance performance, and mean power output, and a decrease in the time needed to complete the trials when compared with placebo (98808,111497,114655). One meta-analysis of studies that evaluated cycling time trial performance found that doses of 4-6 mg/kg, but not doses of 1-3 mg/kg, improved performance (114655). A separate meta-analysis of 14 clinical studies shows that taking caffeine 2-11 mg/kg approximately 45-60 minutes before exercise improves muscle strength and endurance in the upper and lower body when compared with placebo. However, a sub-group analysis shows that muscle strength only improves with caffeine doses of at least 6 mg/kg (114657). Another meta-analysis of small clinical trials shows that the benefit of caffeine on athletic performance seems to increase with increased duration of activity. This suggests that caffeine can improve physical endurance during athletic activities (100371). In these trials, caffeine is typically provided as a single dose 30-150 minutes prior to testing (98808), although one study suggests that taking caffeine 60 minutes prior to peak activity has the most consistent ergogenic benefits (104577). Caffeine might improve performance in some athletic activities but not others. Some research shows that caffeine does not improve performance during athletic activities requiring a high amount of exertion over a short period of time. Such activities include sprinting and lifting (11832,37564,37758,37837,37841,37890,38319,95963,97459,112740). However, it is possible that the negative lifting studies were underpowered. Ballistic exercise, such as jumping or throwing, requires rapid increases in velocity, force, and muscle activation. A meta-analysis of 10 studies shows that caffeine in a range of doses (mean: 3 mg/kg) has a significant ergogenic effect on throwing performance and velocity (111488). A meta-analysis of small studies shows that caffeine modestly improves bench press repetitions and maximum strength, but not perceived exertion, when compared with placebo. Caffeine also tends to improve these parameters for leg presses, but the improvement does not reach significance when compared with placebo (103701). A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in female team-sport athletes shows that caffeine improves specific team-sport skills but has no effect on perceived exertion or agility tests performed after exertion (108799). Conversely, a small individual clinical study shows that taking caffeine 6.5 mg/kg 60 minutes before strength training decreases perceived exertion while increasing the number of repetitions of both upper and lower limb exercises by 17% to 33% over placebo (104581). Some clinical research also shows that taking caffeine can decrease subjective feelings of exertion and fatigue during exercise such as fencing and cycling (17618,37656,91026,91058,91062). Although some other clinical studies show that caffeine does not affect perceived exertion, caffeine does seem to improve performance and cause small increases in the amount of physical work done when compared with placebo in various athletes, including cyclists, runners, basketball players, and golfers (37702,37860,37872,38031,38119,38320,91037,91077,97457,97459)(104580,108800,108804). These effects do not seem to be dependent upon the dose of caffeine (97459), although some research shows that the timing of caffeine intake and exercise may alter overall benefit, with a greater effect seen in the morning compared to the evening (97457,104580). Most research has investigated the acute effects of a single dose of caffeine. The evidence is mixed as to whether chronic intake of caffeine could induce tolerance and reduce any acute ergogenic benefits (114673). One study shows that the consistent consumption of caffeine 3 mg/kg daily for 28 days eliminates the acute benefits of caffeine in work produced when compared with placebo, suggesting the development of tolerance (95955). However, chronic use of caffeine at a dose of 6 mg/kg for 4 days does not seem to induce tolerance to an acute dose of caffeine 6 mg/kg taken 60 minutes prior to a cycling time trial in males who are moderate to high users of caffeine (104576). Similarly, a small clinical study in trained individuals shows that acute supplementation with oral caffeine 6 mg/kg about 1 hour prior to performance improves strength and endurance when compared with placebo or control, regardless of habitual caffeine consumption (108804). Differences may be due to the type of exercise, the acute dose of caffeine, the length of the chronic intake period, and/or the normal caffeine intake of the athlete. Most studies suggest that there is significant inter-individual variability in response to caffeine for improvement of athletic performance (100365). These differences might be due, at least in part, to genotype (100370,114673), although research is conflicting. Caffeine is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) enzyme. One small clinical trial in resistance-trained males shows that taking caffeine 6 mg/kg improves resistance exercise performance in those homozygous for the CYP1A2 rs762551 polymorphism (AA) when compared with those without or heterozygous for that polymorphism (CC or A/C, respectively) (100370). However, another clinical study in trained male athletes shows that taking oral caffeine 4 mg/kg about 30 minutes prior to performance decreases handgrip strength by about 13% in individuals with the CC genotype when compared with placebo, but not in those with the AA or A/C genotypes. No groups experienced an improvement in vertical jump performance (108803). Another small clinical study suggests that CYP1A2 genotype does not affect exercise performance in athletes 60 minutes after taking caffeine 3 mg/kg. In addition, the ADORA2A genotype, which plays a role in caffeine sensitivity, does not seem to affect exercise performance benefits from caffeine (104578). However, these studies are small and used different performance protocols; further research is needed to clarify how these polymorphisms may impact the athletic performance benefits of caffeine (114673). Limited research has also evaluated the use of a caffeine mouth rinse, with mixed findings. Two very small clinical studies in healthy trained males shows that rinsing the mouth with 25 mL of water containing caffeine 85 or 300 mg for 5-10 seconds does not affect athletic performance or time to exhaustion while cycling when compared with placebo (103709,108801). However, another small study in healthy Taekwondo athletes fasting for Ramadan suggests that using a mouth rinse containing caffeine 6 mg/kg, ten seconds prior to exertion, modestly reduces perceived exertion and modestly improves kick performance when compared with using a placebo rinse (103710). Similarly, another small clinical study in healthy, resistance-trained males shows that rinsing the mouth with 25 mL of a solution containing caffeine 3%, but not 1% or 2%, reduces perceived exertion and increases muscular endurance, but not strength, when compared with placebo. The mouth rinse was used for 5 seconds immediately prior to a strength test or once per minute for 2 minutes during a muscular endurance test (108802). Preliminary clinical research has also investigated the use of caffeine in combination with other ingredients, such as sodium bicarbonate or creatine. However these studies have not demonstrated clear benefits in athletic performance over taking caffeine alone (112740,114673).
• Mental alertness. Oral caffeine increases mental alertness. However, it might not improve performance or accuracy to the same extent achieved through adequate sleep. Details: Consumption of caffeinated beverages or caffeine supplements seems to prevent a decline in alertness and cognitive capacity when consumed throughout the day (4221,4224,36439,37727,37757,37759,38070,38075,38158,91093)(91075). Caffeine appears to be especially effective in individuals that are not regular users (91074). Taking caffeine 100-600 mg can improve alertness and speed following prolonged sleep deprivation but usually does not affect mental performance or accuracy (10205,37716,37755,37806,37992,38007,38035,38139,91049,91072)(103706,112736). Drinking coffee containing caffeine 100 mg prior to a cognitive performance test improves reaction times in people with recent poor sleep quality, and in those with adequate sleep. However, the increase in vigilance occurring in the sleep-deprived people does not bring their performance up to the level seen with adequate sleep. Also, the number of errors made by sleep-deprived people seems to increase, suggesting that caffeine may have a detrimental effect on inhibitory control (98809). Caffeine also appears to reduce cognitive impairment caused by medications such as chlorpheniramine (91058). Combining caffeine with certain other supplements may improve mental performance. Taking caffeine 80 mg with taurine seems to provide a small improvement in mental performance (9899), although this effect is not observed in sleep deprived subjects (38154). Some clinical research shows that combining caffeine 40-75 mg with glucose 37.5 grams or L-theanine 97-100 mg improves mental performance better than placebo or either substance alone (13732,37762,37903,38116); however, other clinical research shows no additional benefit from combining L-theanine and caffeine (91045).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Intravenous caffeine may reduce the risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants. Details: Population research has found that initiating caffeine treatment prior to the third day of life in premature infants is associated with a reduced risk of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia compared to later initiation of treatment with caffeine. Additionally, a meta-analysis of available clinical research shows that high-dose caffeine (40-80 mg/kg loading dose, 20 mg/kg daily maintenance) lowers the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia when compared with standard dosing (20 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 5-10 mg/kg daily maintenance). However, small sample sizes and high heterogeneity limit the validity of these findings (97462,100364).
• Diabetes. Dietary caffeine seems to be beneficial for the prevention of type 2 diabetes; it is unclear if it is beneficial for the prevention of gestational diabetes. Also, it is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Details: Total caffeine consumption from beverages such as coffee or tea is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes. This effect appears to be dose-dependent (11353,14313,37850,37871,91040,100368). For example, an increase of 200 mg daily caffeine intake seems to be associated with a 14% decrease in the incidence of type 2 diabetes (91055). Additionally, in North American males, consuming caffeine 417 mg daily from coffee or tea is associated with a 20% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with those consuming less than 37 mg daily. North American females consuming at least 258 mg of caffeine daily from coffee or tea seem to have a 10% to 30% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with those consuming less than 140 mg daily (11353). Japanese adults who consume at least 416 mg of caffeine daily from beverages including coffee or green tea seem to have a 33% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared to those who consume no more than 57 mg daily. The risk reduction appears to be more pronounced in Japanese females when compared with males (14313). It is unclear if caffeine is beneficial in adults with diabetes. A few small studies show that caffeine consumption may further reduce insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes, gestational diabetes, or those at risk for developing diabetes (13744,37653,37820). Caffeine consumption has also been evaluated during pregnancy. An observational study has found that self-reported consumption of beverages containing up to 100 mg of caffeine at 16-22 weeks' gestation is associated with a 47% lower risk of developing gestational diabetes when compared with no intake (108814). Research regarding the effects of caffeine in patients with type 1 diabetes shows conflicting results. One study shows that taking caffeine 250 mg twice daily for 2 weeks can reduce the incidence of elevated blood sugar at night in patients with type 1 diabetes (37660). However, another study in patients with type 1 diabetes shows that taking caffeine 200 mg daily for 3 months may increase the ability to perceive hypoglycemic symptoms when compared with placebo, although overall glycemic control does not seem to be affected (6024). A small clinical crossover study evaluated caffeine for the prevention of exercise-induced hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes using ultra-long-acting insulin. This study shows that consuming a beverage containing caffeine 250 mg, glucose 10 grams, and aspartame 30 minutes before a moderate intensity cycling exercise does not reduce the risk of exercise-related hypoglycemia, alter the time to hypoglycemia, or increase peak plasma glucose levels during exercise when compared with taking glucose and aspartame (114662).
• Memory. Oral caffeine seems to be beneficial for short-term memory recall in college students and extroverted personalities. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for introverted personalities or other populations. Details: Taking a single dose of caffeine 65-200 mg orally daily seems to improve memory function in some individuals such as college students and people with extroverted personalities. A small study shows that taking caffeine does not improve memory function in individuals with introverted personalities (37845,38071,91080).
• Obesity. Oral caffeine, when taken in combination with ephedrine or as a component of green tea, seems to be beneficial for weight loss, short-term. Details: Taking caffeine orally, in combination with ephedrine or as a component of green tea, seems to help reduce weight, short-term (695,696,1704,8647,16892,37617,37831). Caffeine 192 mg in combination with ephedra 20-90 mg per day for 6 months seems to cause a modest weight reduction (5.3 kg) in people with a body mass index (BMI) between 25-40 kg/m². This combination, along with limiting fat intake to 30% of calories and moderate exercise, also seems to reduce body fat, decrease low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. However, even in carefully screened and monitored otherwise healthy adults, caffeine/ephedra combinations can cause small changes in blood pressure and heart rate (8647). Preliminary clinical research also shows that taking 1000 mg of a proprietary combination product containing caffeine and multiple other ingredients (Prograde Metabolism) twice daily for 8 weeks in conjunction with dieting reduces body weight, fat mass, waist circumference, and hip circumference by 1.5%, 5%, 1.8%, and 1.3%, respectively, when compared with dieting alone (40802).
• Pain (acute). Oral caffeine, when taken in combination with acetaminophen, propyphenazone, ibuprofen, or other pain-relieving agents, seems to be beneficial for acute pain. Details: Clinical research shows that taking caffeine 50-130 mg in combination with acetaminophen, propyphenazone, ibuprofen, or other pain-relieving agents can reduce acute pain when compared with the effects of pain-relieving agents alone (37587,37904,38036,38303,91038). Adding ≥100 mg caffeine to treatment with acetaminophen or ibuprofen results in 5% to 10% more patients that achieve at least 50% of maximum pain relief for over 4 hours when compared to treatment with acetaminophen or ibuprofen alone (91038).
• Postdural puncture headache. Oral or intravenous caffeine seem to be beneficial for preventing postdural puncture headache. Details: Using caffeine 300 mg orally or 500 mg in 1,000 mL normal saline intravenously seems to help treat and prevent postdural puncture headache (2727,2728). Using a combination of ergotamine and caffeine seems to be less effective than gabapentin for treating this condition (38147). Lower doses of oral caffeine may not be beneficial. Clinical research shows that oral caffeine, 75-125 mg, does not decrease the risk of postdural headache (91022).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Atrial fibrillation. Oral caffeine does not seem to prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiopulmonary bypass. In addition, it might increase the risk of gastrointestinal side effects. Details: In adults undergoing surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, taking caffeine 400 mg every 8 hours for 6 doses does not seem to reduce the risk of developing atrial fibrillation during the first three post-operative days. This clinical study was stopped prior to the completion of recruitment after an interim analysis showed increased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and no effect on the incidence of atrial fibrillation (97451).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Oral caffeine does not seem to reduce symptoms of ADHD in children. Details: Most research suggests caffeine does not significantly reduce ADHD symptoms in children when used at tolerable doses (10755,10756,10757,10758,10759,10760). The use of caffeine in adolescents and adults with ADHD has not been studied.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral caffeine prevents cognitive decline with aging. Details: Population research from a small cohort of elderly females shows that caffeine intake of more than 371 mg daily is associated with an attenuation in cognitive decline when compared to less than 30 mg daily. This is equivalent to the difference seen over a 7 year span of age. Caffeinated coffee consumption, but not caffeinated chocolate, tea, or cola, was associated with this attenuation in cognitive decline (91088).
• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for preventing dementia; the available research is conflicting. Details: Population research from the UK Biobank has found that caffeine intake up to 400 mg daily is associated with a 24% to 34% reduced risk of developing Alzheimer disease when compared with lower intake. Conversely, population research from the Rush Memory and Aging Project in the US has found that caffeine intake of more than 100 mg daily is associated with a 41% increased risk of developing Alzheimer disease when compared with lower intake. However, when those with mild cognitive impairment at baseline or cases diagnosed within 2 years of follow-up are excluded, these findings become insignificant (108810).
• Asthma. Oral caffeine seems to modestly improve airway function for up to 4 hours in patients with mild to moderate asthma. However, it is unclear if oral caffeine has a clinically significant effect on asthma symptoms or quality of life. Details: Taking caffeine 9 mg/kg orally appears to modestly improve airway function for up to 4 hours in people with mild to moderate asthma (37907,37915). However, more research is needed to determine the appropriate dose, whether any benefit is clinically significant, or whether tolerance occurs with chronic dosing.
• Cancer pain. It is unclear if intravenous caffeine is beneficial for cancer pain. Details: Clinical research shows that receiving caffeine 200 mg intravenously once daily for 2 days results in a significant reduction in pain intensity by 0.833 points on the NRS scale when compared with control in patients receiving opioids for pain from advanced cancer (91081).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral caffeine improves cognitive performance in trained athletes. Details: A meta-analysis of small studies in trained adult athletes shows that consumption of a low to moderate amount of caffeine 15-60 minutes prior to exercise and during exercise improves attention performance, but not reaction time or inhibitory control, when compared with placebo (108797). The validity of these findings is limited by unclear reporting.
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for preventing dementia or improving behavior in patients with dementia. Details: Population research from the Women's Health Initiative has found that caffeine intake of more than 175 mg daily is associated with a 26% reduced risk of developing probable dementia or global cognitive impairment when compared to less than 175 mg daily in postmenopausal adults 65-80 years of age (97458). Population research from the UK Biobank has found that caffeine intake up to 400 mg daily is associated with a 17% to 26% reduced risk for developing all-cause dementia when compared with lower intake. Conversely, population research from the Rush Memory and Aging Project in the US has found that caffeine intake of more than 100 mg daily is associated with a 35% increased risk of developing all-cause dementia when compared with lower intake. However, when those with mild cognitive impairment at baseline or cases diagnosed within 2 years of follow-up are excluded, these findings become insignificant (108810). Caffeine consumption has also been evaluated in patients with dementia. A cross-sectional study in patients with dementia in a care home has found that intake of 'normal' to 'high' amounts of caffeine are associated with reduced agitation and other behavioral symptoms when compared to 'low' intakes of caffeine (104574).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Some population research found that caffeine intake is associated with an increased incidence of depressive symptoms in pediatric patients (37839,38162). However, other population research found that caffeinated beverage intake is associated with a decreased incidence of depression in adults (37969,38165,91067,100366).
• Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) augmentation. Although there has been interest in using intravenous caffeine sodium benzoate to augment electroconvulsive therapy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of caffeine for this condition.
• Exercise-induced hypoxemia. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for hypoxemia associated with exercise. Details: Preliminary clinical research in athletes experiencing exercise-induced hypoxemia shows that taking caffeine 8 mg/kg can improve exercise ventilation, but not ventilatory response or oxygen saturation, when compared with placebo (37750).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for reducing muscle soreness during exercise. Details: There is conflicting clinical evidence as to whether caffeine can reduce exercise-induced muscle pain. Some evidence shows that taking caffeine 100 mg or 10 mg/kg can reduce muscle pain during exercise when compared with placebo (37622,38146). However, the effect of lower doses is unclear. Some evidence shows that taking caffeine 5 mg/kg may reduce exercise-induced muscle pain when compared with placebo (37747,91050), while other evidence suggests that taking caffeine 2-5 mg/kg does not affect muscle pain during exercise (38141).
• Gallbladder disease. It is unclear if increased dietary caffeine intake reduces the risk of developing gallstones. Details: Consumption of caffeinated beverages that provide 400 mg or greater of caffeine per day is associated with a significantly reduced risk of developing symptomatic gallstone disease (3345,8032). The effect seems to be dose-dependent; consumption of 800 mg caffeine per day has the greatest reduction in risk (3345).
• Hepatitis C. It is unclear if increased dietary caffeine reduces the risk for hepatitis C-associated severe liver inflammation, although it may reduce the risk of developing advanced fibrosis. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that regular consumption of caffeine at doses of at least 123 mg daily is associated with a 48% reduced risk of advanced liver fibrosis when compared to lower caffeine intake in patients with hepatitis C virus (95947). An individual population study also found that higher intake of caffeine from coffee is associated with reduced severity of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus. For these patients, the risk of advanced fibrosis is reduced by 14% for each 67 mg of caffeine (37896). However, caffeine intake does not appear to be associated with a reduced risk of moderate to severe liver inflammation in patients with hepatitis C (95947).
• Hypnic headache. It is unclear if oral caffeine reduces the pain associated with this rare condition. Details: Anecdotal evidence suggests that drinking a cup of coffee containing caffeine before bed or upon waking up may help alleviate pain associated with hypnic headaches (38078).
• Hypotension. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial in people with low blood pressure. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming caffeinated beverages increase blood pressure in elderly people with postprandial hypotension (11834,11835).
• Intermittent claudication. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for intermittent claudication. Details: Taking a single dose of caffeine 6 mg/kg orally seems to improve walking distance, muscular strength, and endurance in patients with intermittent claudication; however, balance seems to be reduced (38038).
• Liver disease. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for liver disease prevention. Details: Population research found that there is an inverse association between intake of coffee and the incidence of liver cirrhosis (37576,37608). However, it is unclear if this effect of coffee is attributable to caffeine, since other caffeinated beverages do not show this effect.
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for the symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Details: A small crossover study in adults with MS shows that taking caffeine 200 mg daily for 12 weeks may modestly improve balance, functional mobility, and MS-related quality of life, but not walking function, when compared to a 2-week placebo run-in period. All patients were told to eliminate all other forms of caffeine from their diets; however, baseline caffeine intake was not recorded (114663). The validity of this study is limited by the small size and heterogeneous nature of the study population, which included patients with various forms of MS at varying levels of severity.
• Narcolepsy. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for narcolepsy. Details: A small clinical study in patients with narcolepsy shows that taking caffeine 200 mg daily in the morning for 1 week does not affect reaction time, but modestly reduces drowsiness, when compared with baseline (103698). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a statistical comparison between the treatment and placebo groups.
• Neonatal resuscitation. It is unclear if oral caffeine improves the likelihood for successful extubation in preterm infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in extremely preterm infants requiring mechanical ventilation within the first 5 days of birth shows that early administration of caffeine, given as a loading dose of caffeine citrate 20 mg/kg followed by a maintenance dose of 5 mg/kg daily until extubation, does not reduce mortality or shorten time to first successful extubation when compared to giving a bolus dose of caffeine citrate 20 mg/kg just prior to extubation (97461).
• Nocturnal enuresis. Reducing caffeine intake might reduce the frequency of nocturnal enuresis episodes in children. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children aged 6-15 years with primary nocturnal enuresis shows that limiting caffeine intake to less than 30 mg daily reduces the mean number of bedwetting episodes from 3.5 to 2.4 per week, when compared with no change in the group with intakes of 80-100 mg daily. The probability of bedwetting in the caffeine restricted group was about 14% lower than that in the control group (111495).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for nonmelanoma skin cancer prevention. Details: A review of available population research shows that increased caffeine intake from any source is associated with a 14% reduction in the risk of developing nonmelanoma skin cancer. Consumption of caffeinated coffee, but not decaffeinated coffee, is associated with an 18% reduced risk (97465).
• Parkinson disease. Although consuming caffeinated beverages might reduce the risk of developing Parkinson disease, it is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for improving symptoms. Also, oral caffeine does not seem to prevent tardive dyskinesia. Details: It is unclear whether caffeine improves some symptoms of Parkinson disease, as results from clinical research are conflicting (91069,95951,95954,103705). One clinical study in Parkinson disease patients with extreme daytime somnolence shows that taking caffeine 100 mg twice daily for 3 weeks and then 200 mg twice daily for 3 weeks results in modest improvements in rigidity and bradykinesia, but inconsistent improvements in drowsiness, when compared with placebo (91069). Other clinical research shows that caffeine 200 mg twice daily does not lead to improvements in motor severity, cognition, or somnolence after 6, 12, or 18 months when compared with placebo (95954). Furthermore, a large retrospective study has found that caffeine consumption of more than 300 mg daily for 18 months in conjunction with dopaminergic therapy does not slow the rate of Parkinson disease progression. This research also shows that a reported consumption of caffeine greater than 300 mg, in conjunction with creatine 10 grams daily for 18 months, may accelerate the rate of Parkinson disease progression (95951). The retrospective nature of this study limits the validity of these findings. Caffeine does not appear to be helpful for reducing the risk of tardive dyskinesia. A retrospective analysis has found no definitive difference in onset of tardive dyskinesia in Parkinson patients consuming more than 204 mg caffeine daily when compared with those consuming less than 68 mg daily (91090). Despite these mainly negative findings, large-scale epidemiological studies have found that people who consume caffeinated beverages, such as coffee, tea, and cola, have a decreased risk of Parkinson disease (37931,91060,91071,103705). Males consuming 3-4 cups (28 oz) of caffeinated coffee per day, or 421-2716 mg total caffeine, seem to have the lowest risk of developing this condition. However, a lower risk is also associated with consumption of as little as 124-208 mg of caffeine (6022). In females, more moderate caffeinated coffee consumption, such as 1-3 cups per day, seems to be best (1238). Caffeine does not appear to provide additional protection from Parkinson disease in cigarette smokers (9236,91060).
• Postoperative ileus. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for improving bowel recovery following colorectal surgery. Research is conflicting and may vary depending on the type of procedure performed. Details: A meta-analysis of two small clinical trials in adults undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection shows that taking caffeine 100-200 mg three times daily, starting on postoperative day 1, does not reduce the time to the first stool, time to first flatus, or length of hospital stay (LOS) when compared with placebo (112732). Another meta-analysis of 8 trials, including the 2 trials discussed previously, pooled 610 patients undergoing open and laparoscopic colorectal procedures. The analysis shows that caffeine taken three times daily, starting either on the day of surgery or on postoperative day 1, reduces LOS and the time to first bowel movement when compared with placebo, tea, or decaffeinated coffee. However, a sub-analysis of only laparoscopic procedures shows no difference in LOS between groups. These findings are limited by high heterogeneity, which appears to be due primarily to differences between open and laparoscopic procedures (114660).
• Postoperative pain. It is unclear if intravenous caffeine is beneficial for reducing opioid consumption in adults undergoing surgery. Details: A small clinical study in adults undergoing laparoscopic colorectal and gastrointestinal surgery shows that intravenous caffeine citrate 200 mg at the initiation of surgical closure has no effect on cumulative opioid consumption through postoperative day 3 when compared with placebo. In fact, post-hoc analysis with adjustment for age, sex, comorbidities, history of anxiety or depression, and open surgical conversion suggests an increase in opioid consumption with administration of caffeine when compared with placebo (108809).
• Pre-eclampsia. It is unclear if oral caffeine intake affects the risk of gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia. Details: a meta-analysis of 10 observational studies including about 115,000 pregnant people did not find an association between the level of caffeine intake during pregnancy and the risk of developing gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia (111485).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Population research has found that increased intake of either caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee is associated with a decreased risk of stroke in females (37804). However, it is not clear if the effect of coffee is attributable to the caffeine component.
• Tinnitus. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial in patients with chronic tinnitus. Details: A small clinical study in adults with chronic tinnitus shows that taking a single dose of caffeine 300 mg improves mood and quality of life at 1 hour when compared with baseline. (108805). The lack of statistical comparison to the placebo group limits the validity of these findings. More evidence is needed to rate the effectiveness of caffeine for these uses.

(Read more about CAFFEINE)

EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Oral calcium carbonate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an antacid. Details: Taking calcium carbonate orally as an antacid is effective for treating dyspepsia (1843). Calcium carbonate has FDA approval as an antacid.
• Hyperkalemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities. Details: Administering calcium gluconate intravenously can reverse electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias induced by hyperkalemia (12946). Intravenous calcium gluconate is FDA-approved for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities.
• Hypocalcemia. Oral calcium treats and prevents hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium is used to treat severe hypocalcemia. Details: Taking calcium orally is effective for treating and preventing hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate, acetate, gluceptate, or chloride is effective for severe hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany (12928).
• Kidney failure. Oral calcium carbonate or calcium acetate is used as a phosphate binder during kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium carbonate or calcium acetate orally is effective as a phosphate binder. Calcium acetate (PhosLo) appears to control hyperphosphatemia better than sevelamer (Renagel) (12943,12944,38990). Calcium citrate is not recommended for this purpose because it increases aluminum absorption and does not bind phosphate as efficiently as calcium acetate or calcium carbonate (21631). Some clinical research also shows that taking calcium orally reduces blood pressure in patients with kidney failure (975).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral calcium in combination with vitamin D prevents bone density loss that occurs during long-term treatment with corticosteroids. Details: Taking calcium in combination with vitamin D as adjunctive therapy seems to be effective for reducing bone mineral density loss in people using corticosteroids long-term (982,1046,1830,1831,1832,4462,4463,4464,4465,4466)(4467,12945,38493). One specific product used in clinical research is Oscal (Marion Merrel Dow Inc.), which contains elemental calcium 500 mg per tablet plus vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (982). Another product used is Oscal 250 + D (SmithKline Beecham Healthcare), which contains elemental calcium 250 mg and vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (1046).
• Hyperparathyroidism. Oral calcium reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium orally reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with kidney failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism (1827,1828,1829,39174,39425). In elderly women, the combination of calcium and vitamin D reverses secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces hip fracture risk (8818). Also, population research suggests increased calcium intake from the diet and supplements reduces the risk of primary hyperparathyroidism in women. Supplemental intakes of at least 500 mg/day and dietary intakes of approximately 1100 mg/day are considered to be protective (91353).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate calcium intake, from the diet and/or supplements, is recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate calcium intake in line with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) by age, along with adequate vitamin D intake, for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake when adequate dietary intake is not feasible (109425). In the US and Canada, foods containing at least 200 mg calcium with less phosphorous content than calcium can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate calcium intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (11940,102148). However, calcium supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Also, calcium supplements do not seem to be effective for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) during lactation (988), in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation (1817), or in patients who have had renal transplantation (4823,38736,38871). Maximal bone growth occurs in the teenage years, and then BMD in females remains relatively constant until age 30-40. After age 40, bone loss typically occurs at rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. In males, this occurs several decades later. Bone loss is more pronounced if dietary calcium intake is below the RDA, which is the case for many Americans (2571,2578). One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy children 7-14 years old shows that fortifying food with calcium 250-1000 mg daily for up to 24 months modestly improves femoral neck BMD, but not hip or spine BMD. However, the included trials did not supplement vitamin D (107232). During the 5 years immediately after menopause, calcium supplementation has very little effect on bone loss (2569,2570,2575,2576). The rapid loss of estrogen causes a high bone resorption rate, which increases serum calcium levels and therefore decreases intestinal absorption of calcium (2570). After this period, the typical rate of bone loss is 2% per year (2572,2576). Taking calcium 1000-1600 mg daily as carbonate, citrate, lactate gluconate, or citrate malate salt decreases this rate by 0.25% to 1% annually (977,979,981,2569,2571,2572,2575,2576,2578,6850)(38978,38980,39064). The greatest reductions (1% or more) are seen in the first 1-2 years of supplementation when bone remodeling foci can be filled (2569,2576). After this period, the differences in rate of loss between supplemented and non-supplemented females are closer to 0.25% per year (2569,2577). A meta-analysis of clinical evidence suggests that there is no additional benefit after 4 years (38980). Small clinical studies have found that continuous calcium supplementation at an average daily dose of 1050 mg, started after menopause and continued for 1.5-4 years, may reduce fracture rates by 26% when compared with no calcium supplementation. The largest of these studies was conducted in nursing home residents who also received daily vitamin D; the benefits of calcium, specifically, are unclear (39386). Some research also suggests that calcium and vitamin D improves primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in some older individuals with osteoporosis, particularly the elderly and those who are no longer community dwelling (12930,38875,38849,39026,109471). However, not all research is positive. One large clinical trial in elderly adults with a low-trauma fracture show that taking calcium 1000 mg daily with or without vitamin D 800 IU daily for 2-7 years does not reduce the risk of a second fracture when compared with placebo (13073). Another clinical study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 800 IU daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (less than 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). Also, some exploratory research suggests that supplements may need to be continued indefinitely; in adults over 68 years of age, any effects of 2 years of calcium supplements on BMD appear to be lost within 2 years after discontinuing supplements (6853). Calcium has additive effects when used with other agents such as vitamin D, estrogens, or calcitonin. Whereas calcium alone generally reduces or prevents loss of BMD, combination with other agents can produce small increases in BMD ranging from 0.3% to 3.3% depending on the combination and dosages used (978,980,1836,2570,2571,2572,2576). However, one meta-analysis in healthy adults shows that fortifying foods with calcium 250-1000 mg daily, in conjunction with vitamin D supplementation, for up to 24 months does not improve BMD when compared with control (107232). The full potential of osteoporosis treatments cannot be realized without adequate calcium intake (2569,2570,2571,2572). Advise patients taking agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene (Evista) to ensure that their daily calcium intake meets the RDA. Use supplements if necessary. The usefulness of calcium in preventing osteoporosis in males is not as well-studied. Some observational research has found that calcium 870 mg daily is not associated with changes in BMD and bone loss in males (97201). However, clinical evidence suggests that taking calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years might improve trabecular or cortical bone mass by 2% to 4% (980,8827,8873). Dietary supplementation with calcium and vitamin D seems to moderately reduce bone loss measured in the femoral neck, spine, and total body, and seems to reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in older patients with osteopenia or low BMD (980).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Adequate calcium intake seems to prevent symptoms of PMS. Details: There seems to be a link between low dietary calcium intake and symptoms of PMS (2004,6847,39007). Taking calcium 1000-1336 mg daily seems to significantly reduce depressed mood, water retention, and pain, especially if daily calcium intake is inadequate (1822,1823,1824,2004,95821). Calcium carbonate 1200 mg daily seems to decrease PMS symptom scores by about 18% when compared with placebo (1822). Increasing dietary calcium intake is also associated with a decreased risk of developing PMS. Consuming an average of 1283 mg of calcium per day from foods is associated with about a 30% lower risk of developing PMS compared with consuming an average of 529 mg daily (13094); however, taking calcium supplements does not appear to be associated with the risk of developing PMS.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Oral calcium seems to be beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer, especially in those with adequate vitamin D levels and normal body mass index (BMI). Details: Population studies have found that increased intake of dietary or supplemental calcium is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas (1047,8820,12120,38951,98898,98899). Clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research also show that taking calcium supplements 1.2-2 grams daily for up to 4 years can reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence by up to 29% (970,12118,12950,15267,34596,38718,39042,95817). However, not all research has been positive. Some meta-analyses of clinical research or observational studies suggest that taking calcium does not reduce the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer (34596,39042,39349). Other contradictory research suggests that postmenopausal females who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290); however, this finding may not be reliable due to the high baseline intake of calcium in study participants. The reason for these conflicting findings is not entirely clear. Vitamin D might be an important factor. People with lower than average vitamin D levels do not seem to get any benefit from calcium supplements (12118). Also, one meta-analysis of previous trials suggests that taking calcium 1200 mg daily reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas in people with a normal BMI, but not in those who are overweight or obese (99715). Despite this conflicting evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2005 stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence to support this claim (102366).
• Fetal bone mineralization. If calcium intakes are low during pregnancy, oral calcium seems to be beneficial for increasing fetal bone density. Details: With low dietary calcium intake (less than 562 mg elemental calcium daily) during pregnancy, calcium supplementation increases fetal bone mineralization and density. However, calcium supplementation does not offer any additional benefit if calcium intakes are adequate (3263,3264).
• Hypertension. Oral calcium seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount. However, it is unclear if this reduction is clinically significant. Details: Many clinical trials and observational studies show that intake of calcium supplements or dietary calcium modestly reduces blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension, usually around 1-2 mmHg. Calcium seems to be more effective for certain subpopulations of patients, such as salt-sensitive people and patients with low baseline dietary calcium intake (945,972,974,976,984,1818,1819,1820,1821,6852)(13138,14406,38803,39063,39094,39221). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium intake during pregnancy reduces systolic blood pressure in offspring by 1-2 mmHg (38852). However, a large-scale clinical trial in postmenopausal females shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg daily does not lower blood pressure or reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials shows that taking calcium in combination with vitamin D for up to 7 years has no effect on blood pressure (98861). The validity of this finding is limited by the poor methodological quality of the included studies. Some observational research suggests that calcium can reduce the risk for hypertension. Population research in females aged 45 years and older suggests that higher intake of calcium from both diet and supplement sources is linked to a lower risk of developing hypertension when compared to lower calcium intake (14265). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension. However, the FDA has concluded that this claim is based on supporting, rather than conclusive, evidence (102367).
• Osteomalacia. Oral calcium seems to reverse osteomalacia caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Osteomalacia is commonly caused by vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to osteomalacia in children and adults. Calcium supplementation can reverse osteomalacia caused by calcium deficiency. Along with appropriate vitamin D supplementation, individuals at risk of osteomalacia need sufficient calcium intake (94819).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral calcium seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia in high risk pregnancies, especially if calcium intakes are low. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (971,38756), most clinical research shows that taking calcium orally 1-2 grams daily reduces pregnancy-related hypertension and pre-eclampsia (973,1833,8828,39043,39319,39426,96480). Calcium appears to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia by about 50% when compared with placebo. One meta-analysis of 19 controlled trials involving over 29,000 pregnancies found that for every 19 females treated with calcium, one episode of pre-eclampsia would be avoided (96480). Calcium appears to have the greatest effect in individuals at high-risk of pre-eclampsia or with low calcium levels, and when taken at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation (15029,38497,96480,99714). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding the use of calcium supplements to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. However, due to the limited and conflicting research available at that time, the FDA stated that this outcome was highly unlikely. Since then, large, high-quality clinical research has supported this finding. In fact, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released a recommendation to prescribe oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancies at high risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary calcium intakes are low, in order to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).
• Rickets. Oral calcium seems to reverse rickets caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Rickets is commonly caused be vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to rickets. Calcium supplementation can reverse rickets caused by calcium deficiency (94819). A small clinical study in children with nutritional rickets shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily for 24 weeks improves radiographically measured rickets caused by calcium deficiency. Rickets seems to improve more rapidly with calcium 1000 mg compared to calcium 500 mg. However, increasing the calcium dose to 2000 mg daily is not more beneficial than calcium 1000 mg daily (98904).
• Tooth retention. Oral calcium with vitamin D seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral calcium does not seem to be beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Although some population research disagrees (15631,39041,95811,107237), most research shows that increased calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (15631,16715,98895,107236,107237). Subgroup analyses of population research suggest that calcium intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, adults (15631,107237). Another subgroup analysis in a large meta-analysis of population research also suggests that dietary intake may reduce estrogen receptor(ER)-negative breast cancer, but not ER-positive breast cancer (107236). However, most other research has not evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation or intake on breast cancer subtypes. The best evidence to date, from a large scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years after menopause does not reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer at the end of the study and 5 years after the end of the intervention (16715,98895).
• Fractures. Although oral calcium prevents fractures in osteoporosis, most evidence shows that calcium does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis discussion for more information on the use of calcium for this purpose. Details: The most recent and robust meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium supplementation with or without vitamin D is NOT associated with reduced fractures in older adults without osteoporosis (95822). A large-scale study in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years suggests calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D 400 IU daily for 7 years only modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) and does not significantly reduce fracture risk. This lack of effect may have been due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. In those who were 80% adherent, the combination of calcium plus vitamin D reduced the risk of hip fracture by about 29% (14282). Also, some clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 5 years does not attenuate loss of height after menopause when compared with placebo (95810). Additional meta-analyses of clinical and observational evidence suggest that calcium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, such as hip fractures (38589,38888,98895). Some other research has suggested that calcium in combination with vitamin D reduces fracture risk in older patients without osteoporosis (980,1836,8818,12930,12933,12952,38849,102145,107235); however, this research is confounded by a number of variables, including the presence of hormonal therapy and differing levels of fracture risk at baseline (1836,8818,95822). Conflicting findings on this topic might also be due to genetic differences in patient populations. A population analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study found that, in older females with the lowest genetic susceptibility to low bone mineral density (BMD), taking calcium with vitamin D is associated with a reduction in fracture risk. However, in females with a higher genetic susceptibility to low BMD, there is no association between supplementation and fracture risk. This might be because individuals with a lower susceptibility to low BMD are also more responsive to calcium and vitamin D supplementation (97357). As of April 2018, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with vitamin D >400 IU daily along with calcium >1000 mg daily is safe and effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture. USPSTF recommends against supplementing with calcium 1000 mg daily or less along with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal females (95695).
• Obesity. Oral calcium does not seem to improve weight loss. Details: Observational research has found that adults and children with low calcium intake are more likely to gain weight, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and be overweight or obese when compared to people with high calcium intake (12124,12125,12126,12127,14265). Additional observational research has found that increasing calcium intake is associated with weight loss in females; the results in males have been conflicting (12127,15602,15603). Despite these findings from observational research and a few small clinical studies (12128,15397,14438,98905), most clinical research has found that increased calcium intake does not increase weight loss (12052,13138,15396,15399,38985,39004,97356). The most recent meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies shows that daily dietary and supplemental calcium intake that meets the dietary reference intake (DRI) of 1000 mg or more daily does not increase weight loss in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when compared with intake below the DRI (95813). An older meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials also shows that increased dietary and supplemental calcium intake does not increase weight loss (15605).
• Overall mortality. Oral calcium does not seem to reduce overall mortality. Details: While some population research has found that calcium taken in combination with vitamin D in older females is associated with a lower risk of death (97353), most evidence shows that calcium, with or without vitamin D, has no effect on all-cause mortality (93533,97308).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral calcium does not reduce the risk of developing CVD and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Clinical research shows that calcium does not decrease CVD risk. Several separate meta-analyses of clinical and population research involving over 50,000 patients show that taking calcium 600-1200 mg daily for up to 7 years does not reduce the risk of CVD-related outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or overall mortality (39018,91350,92994,93533,97308,98902,107231,107233). No association was found between total dietary or supplemental calcium intake with or without vitamin D and the risk of CVD or mortality (91350,93533,97308). In fact, some population and clinical research has found that when calcium is used alone or with vitamin D, there is an INCREASED risk of CVD and coronary heart disease (38077,107233). However, other clinical research disagrees (93533). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease by 1.1-1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Intravenous calcium does not prevent nerve pain in patients given oxaliplatin. Oral calcium has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: While pooled analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials suggest that calcium and magnesium infusion decreases the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials shows that the infusion has no effect in preventing neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). Additionally, clinical trials show that administering calcium gluconate 1 gram with magnesium sulfate 1 gram intravenously immediately before, or before and after, the administration of a single oxaliplatin cycle (90005), or over the entire 6-cycle course of oxaliplatin, does not improve symptoms of neurotoxicity when compared with placebo (96474).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral calcium does not prevent MI. When taken in the absence of vitamin D, oral calcium may increase the risk of MI. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of calcium is associated with a decreased risk of MI (91350). However, a 2010 meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking calcium at a dose of at least 500 mg daily is associated with an approximate 30% INCREASE in the risk of MI in patients over the age of 40. According to this analysis, one additional case of MI will occur for every 69 patients that take calcium for 5 years (17482). A more recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of MI by 1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research studied postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233) In contrast, other meta-analyses of clinical research have shown that taking calcium for up to 7 years is NOT associated with an increased risk of MI, including a meta-analysis that only included postmenopausal females (93533,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI in postmenopausal females (93533). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for alcohol use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 800 mg and vitamin D 200 IU orally daily for 14 days modestly reduces alcohol craving scores and withdrawal scores when compared with placebo in adults with alcohol dependence that are undergoing withdrawal. Taking calcium carbonate did not reduce the need for diazepam; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (107234).
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for atherosclerosis. Details: A population study has found that taking calcium 1.2 grams daily for 3 years has no effect on carotid intima thickness or carotid atherosclerosis incidence. A total calcium intake (dietary and supplemental) of at least 1794 mg daily in older females may be associated with a decreased risk of carotid atherosclerosis when compared with a total calcium intake below 1010 mg daily (97351).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the odds of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. Details: A small observational study found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a 52% reduced odds of an autism spectrum disorder in the offspring (98900).
• Cancer. Oral calcium alone does not seem to prevent cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Taking calcium alone does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of cancer (12118,15629). The role of calcium in cancer prevention when taken along with vitamin D is controversial, as conflicting results exist. One clinical trial shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1400-1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1100 IU daily have a 60% lower relative risk for developing cancer of any type. Approximately 25 postmenopausal females would need to take this combination for 4 years to prevent one occurrence of cancer (15629). However, a more recent clinical study shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of cancer at 4 years (93943). Reasons for the disparate results are not entirely clear. The discrepancies do not appear to be related to baseline vitamin D levels or different study populations. It is possible that, given the 10-year time lapse between the two publications, the discrepancies result from differences in cancer detection capability. Also, since cancer risk was a secondary outcome measure in the earlier study and a primary outcome measure in the more recent study, it is possible that the discrepancies result from differences in statistical methodologies. The effect of vitamin D and calcium on cancer risk in males and younger patients is not known. There is also interest in using calcium for reducing the risk of hematological malignancies. An analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU for up to 10 years is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of hematologic malignancies when compared with placebo. However, no effect on hematologic malignancy related mortality was seen (97354).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between a higher dietary intake of calcium and the risk of depression when compared with a lower dietary intake of calcium (96480).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for type 2 diabetes prevention. Details: Some population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet or supplements, alone or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713,96473). However, population research is often limited by confounding variables. For example, one analysis found that any beneficial effect might be influenced by concomitant magnesium intake (96473). Furthermore, other population research has found that serum calcium levels higher than 9.6 mg/dL are associated with greater risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults with osteoporosis. This study is limited because it was not determined whether increased serum calcium was due to increased calcium intake or another factor such as parathyroid function (95815).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing pain associated with dysmenorrhea. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg with vitamin D 5000 IU daily for three menstrual cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (95821). However, calcium carbonate 1000 mg taken alone seems to reduce pain when compared with placebo.
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but dietary calcium does not seem to have any effect (38893).
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing falls. Details: Research suggests that calcium in combination with vitamin D, but not calcium alone, might prevent falls by decreasing body sway and normalizing systolic blood pressure (6362,11939,39038). Some experts think the combination of calcium and vitamin D may be important (11916). Preliminary clinical research in adults residing in a health care facility shows that taking vitamin D supplements while increasing dietary calcium and protein for 2 years reduces falls by 11% when compared with standard diets. Intervention diets were supplemented with milk, yogurt, and cheese to provide calcium 1142 mg and protein 69 grams daily (107235). There might also be different effects in females compared to males. In one study, females aged 65 years or older who took vitamin D 700 IU plus calcium citrate 500 mg daily over a 3-year period had a 46% lower risk of falling. However, this combination did not decrease falls in males (14291).
• Fluorosis. Oral calcium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking calcium orally, in combination with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and vitamin D, seems to be effective for reducing excessive fluoride levels in children and improving symptoms of fluorosis in children aged 6-12 years (990).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral calcium in combination with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing heart failure. Details: Based on a secondary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), taking calcium 1000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily does not reduce the risk of heart failure in the overall population or in individuals at high risk. However, in a subgroup of postmenopausal females without risk factors for heart failure, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of developing heart failure by about 37% (97307).
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for hypercholesterolemia. Details: Some evidence shows that taking calcium carbonate 400 mg three times daily reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4% and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 4% after 6 weeks of treatment when used in combination with a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) (2557). In contrast, a study in females with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 800 mg daily for 2 years might INCREASE total cholesterol levels by about 12 mg/dL when compared with placebo. This same study showed an association between calcium supplementation and an increase in total cholesterol levels and carotid intimal thickness in postmenopausal females, but not premenopausal females (97350). A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials which included both healthy patients and patients with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily and vitamin D 200-7142 IU daily modestly improves HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplementation is more effective in patients with dyslipidemia at baseline. It is unclear if this effect is due to calcium, vitamin D, or the combination (107227). However, other research shows that taking a specific supplement containing calcium 600 mg plus vitamin D 200 IU (Caltrate 600 D, Wyeth Consumer Healthcare Inc.) twice daily in combination with calorie restriction does not reduce total or LDL cholesterol levels when compared with placebo (15601).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing blood levels of lead. Details: Lead is mobilized along with calcium from bone during pregnancy and lactation, resulting in increased serum concentrations of lead. One clinical study suggests that calcium supplementation does not significantly decrease these elevated lead concentrations (1586). However, another clinical study suggests that taking calcium reduces blood lead levels by 11% when compared with placebo, with greatest effects observed in those with high baseline levels of lead (38957).
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral calcium for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of calcium for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium alone or with vitamin D is beneficial for metabolic syndrome prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet and supplements alone, or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713).
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing nephrotic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium 500-1000 mg daily for 3 months in combination with vitamin D3 60,000 IU daily or weekly for 4 weeks has no effect on bone mineral density or the risk of relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (97355).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking calcium alone or with vitamin D3 1000 IU daily reduced the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but had no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma (104622).
• Oral mucositis. When used in combination with fluoride treatments, a calcium phosphate mouth rinse seems to prevent and reduce mucositis-related pain in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that using a particular mouth rinse (Caphosol, EUSA Pharma) containing calcium phosphate, in combination with fluoride treatments, reduces days of mucositis, the duration of pain, and the dose and days of morphine used when compared with placebo and fluoride treatment (38611).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: An older meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (38792). However, a more recent pooled analysis of 15 cohort and case-control studies has found that the highest intake of dietary or dairy calcium is associated with a 20% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared to the lowest intake (97349).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing postpartum depression risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium 2 grams daily beginning at 11-21 weeks gestation reduces depression at 12 weeks postpartum when compared with placebo. However, no benefit is seen at 6 weeks postpartum (39447).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing leg cramps during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking calcium 1 gram twice daily (as a mixture of salts) for 2 weeks can reduce pregnancy-related leg cramps during the second half of pregnancy when compared with no treatment (2567).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily might decrease the risk of developing prostate cancer (14133). However, some epidemiological research suggests that consuming very high doses of calcium, over 2000 mg daily, might actually increase the risk of developing prostate cancer (14134). Some epidemiological research also suggests that doses greater than 1500 mg daily increase the risk of poorly differentiated, clinically advanced, and fatal prostate cancer (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer (98894). However, contradictory research suggests that there is no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall risk of prostate cancer (14131,14132,104630).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Some population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke (4822,38678). However, other population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is not associated with a decreased risk of stroke (91350). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years does not affect the risk of stroke when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females, and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Vertigo. Oral calcium with vitamin D might reduce positional vertigo; the effect of calcium when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking calcium 500 mg and vitamin D 400 IU twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate calcium for these uses.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Alzheimer disease. Oral deanol does not appear to improve memory in individuals with Alzheimer disease. Details: Two very small clinical trials in patients with Alzheimer disease show that taking deanol, titrated up to a dose of 600 mg three times daily, for 4-5 weeks does not seem to improve memory or other cognitive functions when compared with placebo (1680,1681).
• Tardive dyskinesia. Oral deanol does not improve symptoms of tardive dyskinesia. Details: Meta-analyses and individual clinical studies show that taking deanol 1-2 grams daily for up to 1 month does not improve symptoms of tardive dyskinesia when compared with baseline or placebo (1672,1673,1674,1675,1676,1803,1804).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Aging. Although there has been interest in using oral deanol to prevent aging and extend life span, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of deanol for this purpose.
• Aging skin. Although there has been interest in using topical deanol for aging skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of deanol for this purpose.
• Athletic performance. Oral deanol has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy males shows that taking deanol in combination with ginseng, vitamins, and minerals for 6 weeks improves exercise performance by increasing total work load and maximal oxygen consumption during exercise (1671). It is unclear if these findings are due to deanol, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral deanol is beneficial in children with ADHD. Details: Clinical research on the use of deanol in children with ADHD-like symptoms is mixed (1669,1677,1679,92702). One moderate sized clinical study in children with behavioral and learning disorders, most of whom also had hyperactivity, shows that taking deanol 500 mg daily for 3 months significantly improves performance on various psychometric tests when compared with placebo. The improvements seen with deanol were similar to those reported with methylphenidate 40 mg daily (1679). Another small study in children 6-12 years of age with behavior problems consistent with ADHD shows that taking deanol 300-500 mg daily for 12 weeks improves some measures of performance when compared with placebo (92702). However, other research shows that deanol does not improve ADHD symptoms in children (1669,1677). The children evaluated in each of these studies were not diagnosed with ADHD using current diagnostic guidelines, limiting the applicability of these results in clinical practice.
• Autism spectrum disorder. Although there has been interest in using oral deanol for autism spectrum disorder, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of deanol for this purpose.
• Cognitive function. Although there has been interest in using oral deanol to improve cognitive function, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of deanol for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate deanol for these uses.

(Read more about DEANOL)

EFFECTIVE

• Hypokalemia. Oral or intravenous potassium can treat and prevent hypokalemia. Details: Administering potassium orally or intravenously is effective for treating and preventing hypokalemia (15,107970). Oral potassium 20 mEq (780 mg of elemental potassium) is typically taken once daily to prevent hypokalemia (15,95010). Oral potassium 40-100 mEq (1560-3900 mg of elemental potassium) is typically taken in 2-5 divided doses daily to treat hypokalemia (95010). Doses should be limited to 40 mEq (1560 mg of elemental potassium), and the total dose should not exceed 200 mEq (7800 mg of elemental potassium) in 24 hours (95010). Potassium supplementation and route of administration should be individualized based on serum potassium level and patient status (15,107970).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Hypertension. Oral potassium, via dietary intake or supplementation, reduces blood pressure. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary potassium consumption is associated with a lower risk of developing hypertension (1310,8817,69512). Additionally, most clinical research shows that potassium, taken orally as part of the diet or as a supplement, reduces systolic blood pressure by about 3-9.5 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by about 2-6.4 mmHg in patients with or without hypertension (3385,92104,92106,95624,107974). In most of these studies, daily intake of potassium typically ranged from about 1500-7800 mg, with the most common intake being about 2340-2540 mg daily (92104,95624). However, some research shows that taking potassium does not lower systolic or diastolic blood pressure (69541,69550,107966). Differences in the patient populations, potassium intake, and salt intake could have contributed to the conflicting results. Potassium seems to be more effective for people with hypertension, low potassium levels, high daily sodium intake, and for Black adults (3384,3385,3386,92104,92106). Some research also shows that the greatest blood pressure-lowering effects of potassium occur at doses of about 3900-7800 mg daily (95624). A meta-analysis of clinical trials using a novel computational technique to assess both potassium intake and excretion suggests that the optimal blood pressure reduction occurs when taking about 1500 mg supplemental potassium daily or an overall intake of 4500-6500 mg potassium daily (105448). This analysis is limited by the heterogeneity and short duration of the included trials. There is also interest in utilizing low-sodium, high-potassium food substitutes to treat hypertension. Research shows that using salt substitutes containing 25% to 30% potassium chloride reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 3-4.6 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, when compared with regular table salt (107971,107976). In 2017, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) published guidelines recommending that patients with hypertension consume 3500-5000 mg of potassium daily (95680). This intake of potassium is expected to lower systolic blood pressure by about 4-5 mmHg in patients with hypertension and by about 2 mmHg in normotensive patients (3385). Although potassium supplements and dietary potassium both seem to be beneficial, the guidelines recommend getting potassium from dietary sources, since potassium-rich diets are usually heart-healthy (95680). Additionally, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Oral prescription potassium citrate reduces the risk of kidney stone recurrence. It is unclear if non-prescription potassium citrate would be beneficial. Details: The American Urological Association (AUA) recommends potassium citrate therapy for patients with recurrent calcium stones and low urinary citrate, those with recurrent calcium or calcium oxalate stones without current metabolic abnormalities, and those with uric acid or cystine stones. The citrate component reduces urine calcium excretion and increases urine citrate and urine pH, which in turn alleviates crystal growth, formation, and aggregation. Sodium citrate may also be used to prevent stone recurrence; however, due to sodium's propensity to increase urine calcium excretion, potassium citrate remains the preferred salt formulation (107972). It is important to note that potassium citrate supplements are not equivalent to prescription potassium citrate products. Dose and duration of treatment is determined by a healthcare professional and individualized based on a patient's urinary citrate levels (107975,107989). Serum potassium levels should be monitored prior to starting potassium citrate, within 2 weeks of treatment initiation, and every 12 months (107975).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Eating foods high in potassium and low in sodium might reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. It is unclear if taking potassium supplements has the same benefit. Details: Large population studies in adults without prior CVD have found that higher dietary potassium intake is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events (109395,109399). One study found that daily potassium intake of about 3300 mg is associated with a 13% reduction in CVD risk when compared with intake of about 1920 mg (109399). The other study found that each additional 1000 mg of daily urinary potassium excretion, which is a marker of dietary intake, is associated with an 18% reduction in CVD risk (109395). Another observational study in over 15,000 adults with history of stroke or hypertension shows that replacing regular table salt with a substitute product containing 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride for an average of 5 years decreases the rate of stroke, major cardiovascular events, or death (107976). High quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this association. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).
• Stroke. Eating foods high in potassium and low in sodium might reduce the risk of stroke. It is unclear if taking potassium supplements has the same benefit. Details: Higher dietary intake of potassium seems to be associated with a lower risk of stroke. Population research has found that increasing dietary potassium intake by 1-1.5 grams daily is associated with up to a 20% reduced risk of stroke (92105,92107). Some population research has found that higher supplemental intake of potassium is associated with a 29% reduced risk of ischemic stroke. However, supplemental potassium intake is not found to be associated with a lower risk of hemorrhagic or total stroke (92107). An observational study in over 15,000 adults with history of stroke or hypertension shows that replacing regular table salt with a substitute product containing 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride for an average of 5 years decreases the rate of stroke, major cardiovascular events, or death (107976). High quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this association. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Dental hypersensitivity. It is unclear if topical potassium improves dental hypersensitivity. Details: One meta-analysis of clinical research shows that using a dentifrice containing 5% potassium nitrite reduces dentin sensitivity when compared with a dentifrice that does not contain potassium nitrite (69549). Other clinical research published in a systematic review shows that potassium-containing toothpastes might reduce dentin sensitivity more than controls that do not contain potassium. However, these toothpastes might be less effective than other active toothpastes, such as those containing sodium monofluorophosphate, and the effect may result from a placebo effect, since the mechanism of action of potassium is unclear (69456).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if increasing dietary potassium reduces the risk of diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of 7 large population studies has found that consuming dietary potassium 3300-3500 mg daily is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of diabetes when compared with consumption below 1000 mg daily. Results were similar when studies that measured potassium intake with a dietary questionnaire were analyzed separately from those that measured intake based on urinary potassium excretion (110776). However, the validity of this finding is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies. Furthermore, despite use of data from various databases, most studies included in the analysis were conducted by the same author.
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral potassium improves glycemic control in prediabetes. Details: A small clinical study in Black patients with prediabetes shows that taking extended-release potassium (Klor-Con M10, Cardinal Health) 40 mEq daily as potassium chloride for 3 months does not improve glucose tolerance when compared with placebo. Although fasting glucose levels were slightly reduced in the potassium group when compared with placebo, both groups experienced a worsening of glucose intolerance, with no change in insulin levels or glycated hemoglobin (98533).
• Osteoporosis. Although there is interest in using oral potassium for osteoporosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of potassium for this condition.
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral potassium improves physical performance in older adults. Details: Observational research in older adults has found that decreased dietary potassium intake and increased dietary sodium intake over 5 years is associated with worsened physical performance (105450).
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral potassium is beneficial in patients with SLE. Details: Observational research in patients with SLE has found that increased dietary potassium intake is not associated with improvements in disease activity scores or markers of cardiovascular disease, including lipid levels and blood pressure, when compared with low dietary potassium intake. However, higher potassium intake does seem to reduce the odds of having elevated levels of C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation, in these patients (109397). More evidence is needed to rate potassium for these uses.

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Cystic fibrosis. Long-term nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride improves lung function and reduces pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis show that, when taken along with a bronchodilator and other standard therapies, nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride in concentrations of 3% to 7%, up to 10 mL twice daily for 4 weeks, increases forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) when compared with isotonic saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) (26230,26230). This benefit was not seen at 48 weeks. Other clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis shows that inhaling sodium chloride 7%, 4 mL twice daily for 48 weeks, does not improve FEV1 when compared with isotonic saline. However, chronic treatment with hypertonic saline does reduce the number of pulmonary exacerbations and increase the number of patients without pulmonary exacerbations when compared with isotonic saline (29402). It is not clear if this benefit occurs in children with cystic fibrosis. The Pulmonary Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends that individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 6 years or older use nebulized hypertonic saline long-term to improve lung function, reduce the number of exacerbations, and improve quality of life (29403).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity. Oral sodium chloride seems to prevent nephrotoxicity associated with use of amphotericin B. Details: Clinical research shows that administering oral or intravenous sodium chloride 150 mEq daily during treatment with amphotericin B can attenuate the rise in serum creatinine levels and preserve renal function when compared to treatment with amphotericin B alone (26226).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in preventing lithium level fluctuations in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A moderate-sized open-label clinical study in adults with type I bipolar disorder receiving lithium carbonate shows that taking sodium chloride 1 gram daily for 12 weeks along with dietary salt restriction of 1 gram daily reduces the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L, but does not significantly affect serum sodium, potassium, aldosterone, or creatinine levels when compared with controls who were not salt restricted, but were advised not to consume additional salt at the table (112909). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by missing data in both groups.
• Canker sores. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for canker sores, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Congestive heart failure. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in patients with acute decompensated heart failure requiring decongestive therapy with diuretics. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure requiring high-dose intravenous furosemide shows that taking sodium chloride 2 grams three times daily for up to 96 hours does not affect patient weight or serum creatinine levels when compared with placebo (112911). However, the clinical relevance of this study is unclear and it may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Conjunctivitis. Although there is interest in using ophthalmic sodium chloride for conjunctivitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Hyponatremia. Although there is interest in using oral sodium chloride for hyponatremia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral sodium chloride for this condition.
• Pharyngitis. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for pharyngitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial for premature infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in infants born at less than 32 weeks' gestation shows that adding sodium 4 mEq/kg daily to enteral feedings, starting from the 7th day after birth and continuing through the 35th day, reduces the risk of developing hyponatremia and improves weight gain when compared with adding water (98180). A small, open-label clinical study in newborns less than 35 weeks gestation shows that high sodium intake, defined as an average of 0.25% sodium in maintenance fluids, for 48 hours on day 2 and 3 after birth results in less weight loss within the first 72 hours of life when compared with control, but does not improve mortality, length of hospital stay, or complications from prematurity (112908). However, interpretation of these findings is limited by varied concentrations of sodium as an intervention. More evidence is needed to rate sodium for these uses.

(Read more about SODIUM)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral stevia is beneficial in patients with diabetes; the available research is conflicting. Details: A small single-dose study shows that taking stevia leaf extract 1000 mg, standardized to contain 91% stevioside, along with a meal reduces postprandial glucose levels by 18% in adults with type 2 diabetes when compared with a starch control (11812). However, clinical research in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes shows that taking stevioside 250 mg three times daily for 3 months does not affect blood glucose levels or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) when compared with baseline (16705). Also, a small clinical study in patients with diabetes shows that drinking 200 mL of black tea, sweetened with stevia extract 2%, three times daily for 8 weeks does not affect glycemic indices when compared with drinking tea sweetened with sucralose (103695).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral stevia is beneficial in patients with hypertension; the available research is conflicting. Details: Some clinical research in patients with mild to moderate hypertension shows that taking stevioside, a constituent of stevia, 750-1500 mg in three divided doses daily reduces systolic blood pressure by 10-14 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by 6-14 mmHg within one week to three months of treatment initiation and continuing for up to 2 years (11809,11810). However, other clinical research in patients with mild hypertension shows that taking stevioside in doses up to 15 mg/kg daily does not significantly reduce blood pressure (16706).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral stevia is beneficial in patients with obesity; the available research is conflicting. Details: Although a small clinical study in healthy adults shows that drinking water with stevia (Truvia) 245 ppm as a single dose reduces appetite and energy intake when compared with drinking water alone (103697), other small, single-dose studies have shown no effect of stevia 15.3 mg or 1 gram as a single dose on satiety, energy intake, or fullness when compared with either water alone or a non-nutritive sweetener (103696,110124). A small clinical study in healthy adults shows that taking an aqueous stevia leaf extract (SweetLeaf) twice daily for 12 weeks does not affect body weight, compared with an increase in weight in the control group. This suggests that stevia extract may have attenuated weight gain in this study (106458). More evidence is needed to rate stevia for these uses.

(Read more about STEVIA)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cognitive function. Oral L-theanine may improve some aspects of cognitive function. It is unclear if using L-theanine in conjunction with caffeine can enhance the effects of either ingredient. Details: A single dose of L-theanine 100 mg seems to improve vigilant attention, reducing error rates in cognitive tests when compared with placebo (91747). However, taking L-theanine (Suntheanine, Taiyo Kagaku) 200 mg daily for 4 weeks does not improve verbal fluency, memory, motor speed, or executive function in an adult population, although it may moderately improve verbal fluency in a subgroup of people with lower cognitive function at baseline (101986). When L-theanine is combined with caffeine, a meta-analysis and multiple individual clinical studies show that the combination improves alertness, as well as accuracy during a test that requires switching attention between different tasks, but does not improve reaction time (38116,91750,96335,96336). Some research also shows that L-theanine plus caffeine improves cognitive performance and reduces task-induced fatigue when compared with baseline and placebo. However, it is unclear if this is due to the individual ingredients or the combination (38116,96335,96336). Some research suggests that the combination is no better than either individual ingredient alone (91747,96335,96336).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral L-theanine, taken continuously or as a single dose, improves cognition in older adults. Details: A small clinical study in healthy, Japanese adults aged 50-69 years shows that taking a specific product (Suntheanine; Taiyo International.) containing L-theanine 101 mg daily after breakfast for 12 weeks does not improve mini-mental state exam (MMSE) scores when compared with placebo. However, a single-dose analysis from this study shows that administration of L-theanine 101 mg may improve the quality of working memory and reaction times during a cognitive function test when compared with placebo (108553). Patients were permitted to consume polyphenol-rich beverages during the study period; however, consumption was not documented, limiting the validity of this finding.
• Alzheimer disease. Although there is interest in using oral theanine for Alzheimer disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of theanine for this condition.
• Anxiety. It is unclear if oral L-theanine is beneficial in patients with anxiety. Results of clinical research are conflicting. Details: A preliminary clinical study shows that taking a single dose of a specific L-theanine product (Suntheanine, Taiyo Kagaku) 200 mg does not reduce experimentally-induced anticipatory anxiety when compared with placebo (12188). However, another preliminary clinical study in healthy adults with stress-related anxiety shows that taking L-theanine 200 mg daily for 4 weeks reduces anxiety scale scores and sleep disturbance when compared with placebo (101986).
• Attention. It is unclear if oral theanine improves attention. Details: A small clinical study in healthy males shows that taking a single dose of L-theanine 200 mg improves selective attention similar to a single dose of caffeine 160 mg (96337). However, other small clinical studies in adults show that taking L-theanine 100-400 mg does not improve most measures of attention, especially sustained attention or attention in executive control tasks, but doses of 100-200 mg may improve performance in simple attentional tasks when compared with placebo (96338,111396). Some of these studies suggest that taking L-theanine with caffeine appears to provide more benefit than either individual ingredient alone (96337,96338).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Oral L-theanine seems to improve some aspects of ADHD, including cognition and sleep. Details: Some preliminary clinical research in children with ADHD shows that taking a one-time dose of L-theanine 2.5 mg/kg increases cognition scores, but does not improve results on sustained attention or inhibitory control tests, when compared with placebo. Taking L-theanine with caffeine 2 mg/kg also increases cognition scores and improves performance on a sustained attention test, but does not improve inhibitory control, when compared with placebo (104141). Other preliminary clinical research in males aged 8-12 years with ADHD shows that taking a specific L-theanine product (Suntheanine, Taiyo Kagaku) 200 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks increases the percent of time spent in restful sleep by about 5% and decreases the number of bouts of nocturnal activity by about 6 when compared with placebo (91744).
• Cancer. Although there is interest in using oral theanine for cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of theanine for this condition.
• Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Oral L-theanine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with colon cancer shows that taking L-cystine 700 mg and L-theanine 280 mg (Ajinomoto Co. Inc.) orally once daily, starting one week before chemotherapy with TS-1 (Taiho Pharmaceutical) and continuing for 28 days, increases the rate of therapy completion by 49%, reduces the incidence of diarrhea by 37%, reduces appetite loss by 33%, and improves the reported tolerability of chemotherapy when compared with chemotherapy alone (96334). However, this combination does not appear to be beneficial in patients with gastric cancer, or in those with colorectal cancer receiving 4 courses of capecitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. (96334,101985).
• Cognitive impairment. Oral L-theanine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One very small clinical study in adults with mild cognitive impairment shows that taking a product containing L-theanine 120 mg and green tea extract 720 mg (LGNC-07, LG Household & Health Care, Ltd) orally twice daily after meals for 16 weeks modestly improves memory and attention when compared with baseline. However, taking this product does not appear to improve memory and attention when patients with self-reported memory problems, but without mild cognitive impairment, are also considered (96339).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral L-theanine is beneficial in patients with depression. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking a specific L-theanine product (Suntheanine, Taiyo Kagaku Co. Ltd.) 250 mg at bedtime for 8 weeks reduces symptoms and improves sleep quality when compared to baseline in individuals with mild major depressive disorder (MDD) (96331). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Another small clinical study in adults with MDD shows that taking L-theanine 200 mg daily with sertraline for 6 weeks reduces depression symptoms and increases remission rates but does not improve treatment response rates when compared with sertraline and placebo (112278). The validity of these effects is limited by the small sample size and short study duration. Additionally, it is unclear if the reduction in depressive symptoms is clinically significant.
• Erythema. Oral L-theanine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy females with self-perceived skin sensitivity shows that taking a specific supplement containing L-theanine, ashwagandha, and saffron (InnerCalm, Arbonne) daily for 8 weeks reduces facial pigmentation when compared to baseline (111399). The validity of this finding is limited by a lack of a placebo group. It is unclear if these effects are due to L-theanine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). It is unclear if oral L-theanine is beneficial for reducing anxiety in people with GAD. Details: One small clinical study in adults with GAD shows that taking L-theanine 225 mg twice daily for 4 weeks, then 450 mg twice daily for 4 weeks, in conjunction with prescribed antidepressants, does not reduce anxiety scores when compared with antidepressants and placebo (104976).
• Hypertension. Although there is interest in using oral theanine for hypertension, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of theanine for this condition.
• Influenza. Oral L-theanine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a combination of green tea catechins (THEA-FLAN 90S, Ito-en Co.) 378 mg, standardized to contain epigallocatechin gallate 270 mg and L-theanine (Suntheanine, Taiyo Kagaku) 210 mg daily for 5 months reduces the risk of developing clinically diagnosed influenza when compared with placebo. However, the combination does not seem to prevent laboratory-confirmed influenza infection (54021).
• Insomnia. It is unclear if oral L-theanine is beneficial for insomnia. Details: A very small clinical study in young healthy adults with sleep quality worsened by caffeine intake shows that taking L-theanine 50 mg (Suntheanine, Taiyo Kagaku Co. Ltd) once 10 minutes before bedtime suppresses caffeine-induced elevations in wake after sleep onset time but does not improve parameters of sleep quality including sleep onset latency, sleep time, or number of times waking after sleep onset when compared with placebo (112275). L-theanine has also been studied in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical study in adults with insomnia or disturbed sleep patterns shows that a specific product (RLX2; LiveLife Biosciences AG) containing L-theanine 50 mg and a specific casein peptide, alpha-s1-casein tryptic hydrolysate, 150 mg, taken one hour before bedtime for 4 weeks, increases sleep duration by 45 minutes and improves habitual sleep efficiency and daytime dysfunction when compared with baseline (108556). Another very small clinical study in healthy adults shows that taking a combination product containing tryptophan, glycine, magnesium, tart cherry powder, and L-theanine 2 hours before bedtime decreases sleep onset latency and increases total sleep duration, leading to better sleep efficiency and reduced morning sleepiness, when compared with placebo (111184). Another combination product containing L-theanine, ashwagandha, and saffron (InnerCalm, Arbonne), taken daily for 8 weeks, seems to improve sleep quality when compared to baseline (111399). However, the validity of this finding is limited by a lack of a control group. It is unclear if the effects described above are due to L-theanine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). It is unclear if oral L-theanine is beneficial for OCD. Details: A small clinical study in adults with OCD shows that taking L-theanine 100 mg twice daily for 10 weeks with fluvoxamine reduces OCD symptoms, particularly obsessive symptoms, and increases the proportion of patients with a complete response to treatment but does not improve compulsive symptoms, partial response rates, or remission rates when compared with placebo and fluvoxamine (112276).
• Postoperative recovery. Oral theanine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study of adults with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy shows that taking theanine 280 mg and cystine 700 mg daily, staring 4 days before surgery and continued for 13 days after surgery, does not improve measures of physical activity but does improve exercise tolerance and some measures of quality of life when compared with placebo (111400). It is unclear if these findings are due to theanine, cystine, or the combination.
• Schizophrenia. It is unclear if oral L-theanine is beneficial in patients with schizophrenia; the available evidence is limited and conflicting. Details: One small preliminary clinical study in adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder shows that taking L-theanine (Biosynergy) 200 mg orally twice daily for 8 weeks along with antipsychotic medications improves positive symptoms, anxiety, and general psychopathology symptoms, such as poor impulse control and disorientation, when compared with placebo. However, theanine does not improve general disease severity, negative symptoms, depression, cognitive function, extrapyramidal side effects, or quality of life (96341). In contrast, two small clinical studies show that taking L-theanine 400 mg (Suntheanine, BioSynergy Health Alternatives) with antipsychotics and with or without pregnenolone 50 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces negative symptoms, general psychopathology symptoms, and anxiety when compared with placebo in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. However, there were no improvements in positive schizophrenia symptoms, extrapyramidal side effects, or symptoms of depression (97923,112277). The inconsistency of results might be due to the small study sizes and the subjectivity of the outcomes measured.
• Stress. It is unclear if oral L-theanine is beneficial in patients with stress. Details: One very small clinical study shows that taking L-theanine 200 mg prior to a stress-inducing exam reduces tension-anxiety and may prevent blood pressure increases caused by psychological stress when compared with placebo (91746). Other preliminary clinical research in pharmacy students shows that taking theanine 200 mg twice daily for one week prior, and then for the first 10 days of a pharmacy practice period, decreases subjective stress scores when compared with placebo (91745). Another small clinical study in healthy young adults shows that drinking a beverage containing L-theanine 200 mg alone or combined with L-arginine 50 mg after a psychological stressor reduces stress, as measured by salivary alpha-amylase activity, when compared with placebo. The combination of L-arginine and L-theanine did not differ from L-theanine alone, suggesting that the combination does not act synergistically to reduce markers of stress (110393). However, not all research has been positive. A small clinical study shows that taking a specific L-theanine product (Suntheanine, Taiyo Kagaku) 200 mg induces subjective feelings of tranquility in relaxed people, but not those with experimentally-induced anticipatory anxiety, when compared with placebo (12188). Also, a small, clinical crossover study in healthy, moderately stressed adults shows that taking a single dose of a specific product (Alphawave; Ethical Naturals) containing L-theanine 200 mg prior to a stress-inducing exam does not improve anxiety at any time point when compared with placebo (108554). Due to the single-dose nature of this study, the effects of continued administration of this product are unclear. L-theanine has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical study in adults with stress shows that taking a specific combination product (Mg-Teadiola, Sanofi-Aventis Group), containing green tea extract 125 mg (providing 50 mg L-theanine), magnesium 150 mg, vitamin B6 0.2 mg, vitamin B9 0.1 mg, vitamin B12 1.25 mcg, and rhodiola 222 mg, orally once daily for 28 days modestly improves stress and anxiety scores when compared with placebo. Improvements in stress scores, but not anxiety scores, appear to persist at 28 days after treatment completion (108672). It is unclear if any effects are due to L-theanine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Tourette syndrome. It is unclear if oral L-theanine is beneficial in children with Tourette syndrome. Details: A small, nonblinded clinical study in children aged 4-17 years with untreated Tourette syndrome or with chronic tic disorder and associated symptoms of anxiety shows that taking a liquid nutritional supplement providing L-theanine 200 mg and vitamin B6 2.8 mg daily for 2 months improves scores on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale, but does not reduce anxiety, when compared with patients receiving psychoeducation (108555). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. More evidence is needed to rate theanine for these uses.

(Read more about THEANINE)

EFFECTIVE

• Phenylketonuria (PKU). Oral tyrosine as a component of medical foods is recommended in people with PKU, a disorder in which phenylalanine cannot be endogenously metabolized into tyrosine. Details: Tyrosine is used as a component of medical foods for people with phenylketonuria (PKU) (7212,7213,7232). Current guidelines recommend that people with PKU maintain a diet low in phenylalanine and incorporate tyrosine as a component of medical foods to maintain normal blood levels of tyrosine (95108). Supplementation with additional tyrosine is recommended only for patients with consistently low blood levels of tyrosine despite using tyrosine-containing medical foods (95108). Routine supplementation with free tyrosine is not recommended for most patients because it can produce wide variations in tyrosine plasma concentrations and side effects (7212,95108). Tyrosine intake does not improve neuropsychological measures in patients with PKU (81503,91471,95108).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cognitive function. Oral tyrosine might improve cognitive function, particularly in patients exposed to stressors such as excessive cold, noise, or sleep deprivation. Details: Most research suggests that taking tyrosine orally improves cognitive function, particularly under stressful conditions. Small clinical studies in healthy adults show that taking tyrosine 100-300 mg/kg in the setting of exposure to stressors such as excessive cold, noise, or sleep deprivation improves cognitive performance measures, such as executive function and short-term memory, when compared with placebo (7215,81472,81476,81484,81501). Other small clinical studies in healthy patients show that taking tyrosine 2 grams may improve response time without detracting from performance and could improve some measures of cognitive response to conflict when compared with placebo (101082,111248). Some of these small studies may be inadequately powered to detect an effect on some cognitive function tests. Tyrosine has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients for this purpose. A small clinical study in healthy adults with fatigue shows that taking tyrosine, serine, alanine, glutamate, and aspartate daily for 4 weeks improves measures of cognitive function including attention, spatial cognition, orientation, motivation, and time management when compared with placebo (111249). It is unclear if these effects are due to tyrosine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Memory. Taking tyrosine orally seems to improve memory in patients exposed to stressors such as cold or those having to complete multiple tasks at once. Details: Small clinical studies in healthy adults show that taking tyrosine 150-300 mg/kg prior to acute exposure to stress that is cold-induced, noise-induced, or induced by multi-tasking improves memory performance when compared with placebo (81469,81477,81499,81501). However, tyrosine 150 mg/kg does not seem to improve memory in less stressful situations such as performing one simple task or testing when not exposed to cold (81469,81499).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral tyrosine does not improve athletic performance when taken prior to exercise. Details: Clinical studies show that taking tyrosine orally prior to participating in treadmill or cycling exercises conducted at temperate temperatures or in the heat does not improve strength, endurance, or performance when compared with placebo (81471,81474,81504,91470,104403). Another very small clinical study in healthy males shows that taking a multi-ingredient pre-workout supplement containing L-tyrosine, beta-alanine, L-citrulline maleate, arginine alpha-ketoglutarate, L-taurine, and caffeine does not increase bench press strength endurance when compared with equivalent amounts of anhydrous caffeine (111250).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. Oral tyrosine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with alcohol use disorder shows that taking a combination of tyrosine 900 mg, D,L-phenylalanine 1.5 grams, L-glutamine 300 mg, and L-tryptophan 400 mg daily along with a multivitamin supplement reduces withdrawal symptoms and decreases stress when compared with placebo (81552). It is unclear if these effects are due to tyrosine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral tyrosine is beneficial for improving ADHD symptoms. Details: A very small clinical study shows that taking tyrosine does not improve symptoms of ADHD in children when compared with baseline (7209). Furthermore, another very small clinical trial in adults with ADHD shows that taking tyrosine daily for 8 weeks does not improve inattention when compared with baseline. Some patients might have transient symptom improvement after 2 weeks, but seem to acquire tolerance by 6 weeks (7210). The validity of these findings is limited by the small study size and lack of control groups.
• Cocaine dependence. Oral tyrosine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with cocaine dependence shows that taking L-tyrosine 1 gram in the morning and L-tryptophan 1 gram in the evening for 14 days does not reduce drug cravings or withdrawal symptoms when compared with placebo (81480).
• Dementia. Oral tyrosine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with severe Alzheimer disease or multi-infarct dementia shows that taking a combination of tyrosine 4 grams, 5-HTP 800 mg, and carbidopa 100 mg orally daily does not improve clinical or psychological parameters in most patients when compared with baseline (918). The validity of this finding is limited by the small study size and a lack of control group.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral tyrosine is beneficial for improving major depressive disorder. Details: A small clinical study in patients with major depression shows that taking L-tyrosine 100 mg/kg daily for 4 weeks does not improve depressive symptoms when compared with placebo (7208).
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). Although there is interest in using oral tyrosine for ED, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of tyrosine for this condition.
• Fatigue. Oral tyrosine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults with fatigue shows that taking tyrosine, serine, alanine, glutamate, and aspartate daily for 4 weeks does not improve subjective or objective measures of fatigue when compared with placebo (111249).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral tyrosine is beneficial for reducing hypertension of mild severity. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with mild essential hypertension shows that taking oral tyrosine 2.5 grams three times daily with meals for 2 weeks does not affect systolic or diastolic blood pressure when compared with control (81487).
• Mitochondrial myopathies. Although there is interest in using oral tyrosine for nemaline myopathy, a type of mitochondrial myopathy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of tyrosine for this condition.
• Narcolepsy. It is unclear if oral tyrosine is beneficial for improving narcolepsy symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients with narcolepsy shows that taking capsules containing tyrosine 3 grams orally three times daily for 4 weeks might reduce feelings of tiredness or drowsiness when compared with placebo, but the overall effect is not clinically significant. Tyrosine also does not seem to improve sudden muscle weakness, sleep paralysis, night-time sleep, sleep latency, or speed and attention after waking when compared with placebo (81482).
• Obesity. Oral tyrosine has only been evaluated for in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in overweight or obese patients shows that taking a supplement containing tyrosine 1.2 grams, cayenne 450 mg, green tea 1.5 grams, caffeine 150 mg, and calcium carbonate 3.89 grams daily for 8 weeks slightly reduces body fat mass by 0.9 kg when compared with placebo (81475). It is not clear if any potential benefit is due to tyrosine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Opioid withdrawal. Oral tyrosine has only been evaluated for heroin withdrawal in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in Chinese males undergoing detoxification for heroin addiction shows that taking a combination of tyrosine 50 mg/kg, 5-HTP 200 mg, phosphatidylcholine 1200 mg, and L-glutamine 50 mg/kg daily for 6 days can reduce insomnia and withdrawal symptoms and improve mood when compared with placebo (88178). It is not clear if this effect is due to tyrosine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Parkinson disease. Although there is interest in using oral tyrosine for Parkinson disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of tyrosine for this condition.
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Although there is interest in using oral tyrosine for PMS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of tyrosine for this condition.
• Schizophrenia. It is unclear if oral tyrosine is beneficial for improving schizophrenia symptoms. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with schizophrenia shows that taking L-tyrosine 10 grams daily in four divided doses along with molindone 150 mg daily for 3 weeks does not improve symptoms of schizophrenia when compared with taking molindone alone (81554).
• Sleep deprivation. It is unclear if oral tyrosine is beneficial for improving alertness in sleep deprived adults. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking tyrosine 150 mg/kg after the loss of a night's sleep seems to delay performance decline in psychomotor tests by about 3 hours when compared with placebo (7215). Another small clinical study in sleep-deprived patients shows that taking tyrosine 150 mg/kg improves memory, reasoning, and vigilance when compared with placebo at 5.5 hours after ingestion, but not at 1.5 hours. Tyrosine was less effective than taking amphetamine, phentermine, or caffeine (81472).
• Stress. Although there is interest in using oral tyrosine for stress, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of tyrosine for this condition.
• Wrinkled skin. Topical tyrosine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small study in patients with photodamaged skin shows that applying a topical preparation containing 10% vitamin C, acetyl tyrosine, zinc sulfate, sodium hyaluronate, and bioflavonoids (High Potency Serum, Cellex-C International Inc.) for 3 months to the face seems to improve fine and coarse wrinkling, yellowing and sallowness, roughness, and skin tone when compared with placebo (6155). It is unclear if the benefits are due to tyrosine, other ingredients, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate the effectiveness of tyrosine for these uses.

(Read more about TYROSINE)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. 5-HTP has been used safely in doses up to 400 mg daily for up to one year (913,30007,30130). Doses up to 1.2 grams daily have been used with apparent safety for up to 10 months (914,30018,30125,30164,30165). Doses of 3 grams daily have been used safely for 3 weeks (30138). There is some controversy about the safety of 5-HTP due to concerns for eosinophilia myalgia syndrome (EMS) (902,919,7067,10084,30178). There is speculation that only certain, contaminated 5-HTP products may cause this serious adverse effect (88174). So far, there is not enough evidence to know if EMS is caused by 5-HTP, contaminants, or other unknown factors (919,7067,10084).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in large doses. Doses of 6-10 grams daily have been associated with severe gastrointestinal effects and hyperkinesis (30139,30183). The risk may be reduced if the dose is increased gradually.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Doses of 5-HTP up to 5 mg/kg daily have been used safely for up to 3 years in infants and children up to 12 years old (30128,30153,88173). There is some controversy about the safety of 5-HTP due to concerns for eosinophilia myalgia syndrome (EMS) (902,919,7067,10084,30178). There is speculation that only certain, contaminated 5-HTP products may cause this serious adverse effect (88174). So far, there is not enough evidence to know if EMS is caused by 5-HTP, contaminants, or other unknown factors (919,7067,10084).

(Read more about 5-HTP)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used in amounts commonly found in foods.

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately for medicinal purposes, short term. Beetroot juice has been safely used in clinical trials in doses of up to 500 mL daily for up to 7 days and a beetroot-based nutritional gel has been used safely in doses of up to 100 grams daily for 8 days (94461,94462,94464,100149,100152,100153).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of beets used medicinally during pregnancy and breast-feeding.

(Read more about BEET)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Oral beta-alanine, including a specific commercial product (CarnoSyn, Natural Alternatives International), has been used with apparent safety in doses up to 6.4 grams daily for 12 weeks in younger adults (14611,16025,16439,16441,18227,94357,97972,101028,101029,104144,106717), and up to 3.2 grams daily for 12 weeks in adults aged 55 years and older (16442,97955,97961,97965).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using in medicinal amounts.

(Read more about BETA-ALANINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally, parenterally, or rectally and appropriately. Caffeine has Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912,98806). Caffeine is also an FDA-approved product and a component of several over-the-counter and prescription products (4912,11832). According to a review by Health Canada, and a subsequent large meta-analysis conducted in the US, doses of caffeine up to 400 mg daily are not associated with significant adverse cardiovascular, bone, behavioral, or reproductive effects in healthy adults (11733,98806). The US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee states that there is strong and consistent evidence that consumption of caffeine 400 mg daily is not associated with increased risk of major chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease or cancer, in healthy adults (98806). This amount of caffeine is similar to the amount of caffeine found in approximately 4 cups of coffee. Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine from caffeine-containing natural ingredients such as coffee or green tea does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally, long-term or in high doses (91063). Chronic use, especially in large amounts, can produce tolerance, habituation, psychological dependence, and other adverse effects (3719). Acute use of high doses, typically above 400 mg daily, has been associated with significant adverse effects such as tachyarrhythmia and sleep disturbances (11832). Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine from caffeine-containing natural ingredients such as coffee or green tea does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

LIKELY UNSAFE ...when used orally in very high doses. The fatal acute oral dose of caffeine is estimated to be 10-14 grams (150-200 mg/kg). Serious toxicity can occur at lower doses depending on variables in caffeine sensitivity such as smoking, age, or prior caffeine use (11832,95700,97454,104573). Caffeine products sold to consumers in highly concentrated or pure formulations are considered to a serious health concern because these products have a risk of being used in very high doses. Concentrated liquid caffeine can contain about 2 grams of caffeine in a half cup. Powdered pure caffeine can contain about 3.2 grams of caffeine in one teaspoon. Powdered pure caffeine can be fatal in adults when used in doses of 2 tablespoons or less. As of 2018, these products are considered by the FDA to be unlawful when sold to consumers in bulk quantities (95700).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally or intravenously and appropriately in neonates under the guidance of a healthcare professional (6371,38340,38344,91084,91087,97452). ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods and beverages in children and adolescents (4912,11833,36555). Daily intake of caffeine in doses of less than 2.5 mg/kg daily are not associated with significant adverse effects in children and adolescents (11733,98806). Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine from caffeine-containing natural ingredients such as coffee or green tea does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Intakes of caffeine should be monitored during pregnancy. Caffeine crosses the human placenta, but is not considered a teratogen (38048,38252,91032). Fetal blood and tissue levels are similar to maternal concentrations (4260). The use of caffeine during pregnancy is controversial; however, moderate consumption has not been associated with clinically important adverse fetal effects (2708,2709,2710,2711,9606,16014,16015,98806,108814). In some studies consuming amounts over 200 mg daily is associated with a significantly increased risk of miscarriage (16014,37960). This increased risk seems to occur in those with genotypes that confer a slow rate of caffeine metabolism (98806). According to a review by Health Canada, and a subsequent large meta-analysis conducted in the US, up to 300 mg daily can be consumed during pregnancy without an increased risk of spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, preterm birth, fetal growth retardation, or congenital malformations (11733,98806). However, observational research in a Norwegian cohort found that caffeine consumption is associated with a 16% increased odds of the baby being born small for gestational age when compared with no consumption (100369,103707). The same Norwegian cohort found that low to moderate caffeine consumption during pregnancy is not associated with changes in neurodevelopment in children up to 8 years of age (103699). Advise patients to keep caffeine consumption below 300 mg daily during pregnancy. This is similar to the amount of caffeine in about 3 cups of coffee or tea.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in amounts over 300 mg daily. Caffeine crosses the placenta, producing fetal blood concentrations similar to maternal levels (4260,98806). Consumption of caffeine in amounts over 300 mg daily is associated with a significantly increased risk of miscarriage in some studies (16014,98806). Advise patients to keep caffeine consumption below 300 mg daily during pregnancy. This is similar to the amount of caffeine in about 3 cups of coffee or tea. Additionally, high doses of caffeine throughout pregnancy have resulted in symptoms of caffeine withdrawal in newborn infants (9891). High doses of caffeine have also been associated with spontaneous abortion, premature delivery, and low birth weight (2709,2711,91033,91048,95949). In a cohort of mother/infant pairs with a median maternal plasma caffeine level of 168.5 ng/mL (range 29.5-650.5 ng/mL) during pregnancy, birth weights and lengths were lower in the 4th quartile of caffeine intake compared with the 1st. By age 7, heights and weights were lower by 1.5 cm and 1.1 kg respectively. In another cohort of mother/infant pairs with higher maternal pregnancy plasma caffeine levels, median 625.5 ng/mL (range 86.2 to 1994.7 ng/mL), heights at age 8 were 2.2 cm lower, but there was no difference in weights (109846).

LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Caffeine intake should be closely monitored while breast-feeding. During lactation, breast milk concentrations of caffeine are thought to be approximately 50% of serum concentrations and caffeine peaks in breastmilk approximately 1-2 hours after consumption (23590).

LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in large amounts. Caffeine is excreted slowly in infants and may accumulate. Caffeine can cause sleep disturbances, irritability, and increased bowel activity in breast-fed infants exposed to caffeine (2708,6026).

(Read more about CAFFEINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (7555,12928,12946,95817). However, excessive doses should be avoided. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: Age 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51+ years, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stone, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). Also, advise patients taking calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D (93533).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. The National Academy of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51 years and older, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients to not consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). Also, advise patients taking calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D (93533).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (17506).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (945,1586,3263,3264,17506). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prescribing oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancy to those with low dietary calcium intake to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the same daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age independent of pregnancy status: 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg (17506). Doses over these amounts might increase the risk of neonatal hypocalcemia-induced seizures possibly caused by transient neonatal hypoparathyroidism in the setting of excessive calcium supplementation during pregnancy, especially during the third trimester. Neonatal hypocalcemia is a risk factor for neonatal seizures (97345).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Deanol has been safely used at doses up to 2 grams daily for up to 4 weeks and doses up to 500 mg daily for up to 3 months (1668,1671,1672,1673,1674,1675,1676,1679,1680,1681). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of deanol when used topically.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about DEANOL)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in doses up to 100 mEq total potassium daily, not to exceed 200 mEq in a 24-hour period (95010,107989). Oral potassium chloride and potassium citrate are FDA-approved prescription products (95010,107989). Larger doses increase the risk of hyperkalemia (15). ...when administered intravenously (IV) at appropriate infusion rates (95011). Parenteral potassium is an FDA-approved prescription product (15,95011). A tolerable upper intake level (UL) for potassium has not been established; however, potassium levels should be monitored in individuals at increased risk for hyperkalemia, such as those with kidney disease, heart failure, and adrenal insufficiency (100310,107966).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in dietary amounts. A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for healthy individuals (6243,100310).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in dietary amounts of 40-80 mEq daily (15). A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for healthy individuals (100310).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher doses can be safely used therapeutically with appropriate medical monitoring (26226,26227).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid exceeding the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension and increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (26229,98176,98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,100310,109395,109396,109398,109399). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sodium when used topically.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (26229,100310). Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid prolonged use of doses exceeding the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension (26229).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in higher doses. Higher intake can cause hypertension (100310). Also, both the highest and the lowest pre-pregnancy sodium quintile intakes are associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia, and the delivery of small for gestational age (SGA) infants when compared to the middle intake quintile (106264).

(Read more about SODIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when certain stevia constituents, including stevioside and rebaudiosides A, D, and M, are used orally as sweeteners in foods. These constituents have generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status in the US for this purpose (16699,16700,16702,16705,16706,108049). The stevia constituent stevioside has been safely used in doses of up to 1500 mg daily for 2 years (11809,11810,11811). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of whole stevia or stevia extracts when used orally. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has determined that the acceptable intake of steviol glycosides is 4 mg/kg daily (106456); however, it is unclear how this relates to the use of whole stevia or stevia extract.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about STEVIA)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately, short-term. L-theanine has been used safely in clinical research in doses of up to 900 mg daily for 8 weeks (12188,36439,96331,96332,96334,96341,97923,101986,104976). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of L-theanine when used long-term.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately, short-term. A specific L-theanine product (Suntheanine, Taiyo Kagaku) 200 mg twice daily has been used safely in males aged 8-12 years for up to 6 weeks (91744).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about THEANINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Tyrosine has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts, short-term. Tyrosine has been used safely in doses up to 150 mg/kg daily for up to 3 months (7210,7211,7215). ...when used topically and appropriately (6155).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of tyrosine during pregnancy and lactation when used in medicinal amounts. Some pharmacokinetic research shows that taking a single dose of tyrosine 2-10 grams orally can modestly increase levels of free tyrosine in breast milk. However, total levels are not affected, and levels remain within the range found in infant formulas. Therefore, it is not clear if the increase in free tyrosine is a concern (91467).

(Read more about TYROSINE)

CARBIDOPA (Lodosyn) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Combining 5-HTP and carbidopa can increase the risk of serotonergic side effects.  Details Carbidopa is sometimes used with 5-HTP to minimize peripheral 5-HTP metabolism and boost the amount that reaches the brain. However, this combination might also increase the risk of some side effects including hypomania, restlessness, rapid speech, anxiety, insomnia, and aggressiveness (30076,30132,30158). Combining carbidopa and 5-HTP might also increase the risk of scleroderma-like skin changes due to elevated serotonin levels (1403).

CNS DEPRESSANTS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use of 5-HTP with medications that cause sedation might have additive effects.  Details In clinical trials, 5-HTP has been associated with drowsiness and somnolence (914,30093,30129,30130).

SEROTONERGIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Combining serotonergic drugs with 5-HTP might cause additive serotonergic effects.  Details 5-HTP can increase serotonin levels and cause serotonergic effects (901). Theoretically, combining serotonergic drugs with 5-HTP might increase the risk of serotonergic side effects, including serotonin syndrome and cerebral vasoconstrictive disorders (8056). However, serotonin syndrome with 5-HTP has not yet been reported in humans (104941). Monitor patients for signs of serotonin syndrome and other serotonergic side effects if using 5-HTP with serotonergic drugs.

(Read more about 5-HTP)

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, beet might decrease the levels and clinical effects of CYP1A2 substrates.  Details In vitro research suggests that beet induces CYP1A2 enzymes (111404).

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, beet might increase the levels of CYP3A4 substrates.  Details In vitro research suggests that betanin, the major pigment in beet, competitively inhibits CYP3A4 in a dose-dependent manner similarly to strong CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole (113425).

(Read more about BEET)

(Read more about BETA-ALANINE)

ADENOSINE (Adenocard) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, caffeine might decrease the vasodilatory effects of adenosine and interfere with its use prior to stress testing.  Details Some evidence shows that caffeine is a competitive inhibitor of adenosine and can reduce the vasodilatory effects of adenosine in humans (38172). However, other research shows that caffeine does not seem to affect supplemental adenosine because high interstitial levels of adenosine overcome the antagonistic effects of caffeine (11771). It is recommended that methylxanthines and methylxanthine-containing products be stopped 24 hours prior to pharmacological stress tests (11770). However, methylxanthines appear more likely to interfere with dipyridamole (Persantine) than adenosine-induced stress testing (11771).

ALCOHOL (Ethanol) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Alcohol reduces caffeine metabolism. Concomitant use of alcohol can increase caffeine serum concentrations and the risk of caffeine adverse effects (6370).

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine may increase the risk of bleeding if used with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.  Details Caffeine is reported to have antiplatelet activity. Theoretically, it might increase the risk of bleeding when used concomitantly with these agents (8028,8029); however, this interaction has not been reported in humans.

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, taking caffeine with antidiabetes drugs might interfere with blood glucose control.  Details Data are conflicting. Reports claim that caffeine might increase or decrease blood sugar (6024,8646,114662).

CARBAMAZEPINE (Tegretol) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of carbamazepine and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that taking caffeine can lower the anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine and can induce seizures when taken in doses above 400 mg/kg (23559,23561). Human research has shown that taking caffeine 300 mg in three divided doses along with carbamazepine 200 mg reduces the bioavailability of carbamazepine by 32% and prolongs the plasma half-life of carbamazepine 2-fold in healthy individuals (23562).

CIMETIDINE (Tagamet) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cimetidine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cimetidine decreases the rate of caffeine clearance by 31% to 42% (11736).

CLOZAPINE (Clozaril) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Caffeine might increase the levels and adverse effects of clozapine and acutely exacerbate psychotic symptoms.  Details Caffeine might increase the effects and toxicity of clozapine. Caffeine doses of 400-1000 mg per day inhibit clozapine metabolism (5051). Clozapine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2). Although researchers speculate that caffeine might inhibit CYP1A2, there is no reliable evidence that caffeine affects CYP1A2. There is also speculation that genetic factors might make some patients more sensitive to an interaction between clozapine and caffeine (13741). In one case report, severe, life-threatening clozapine toxicity and multiorgan system failure occurred in a patient with schizophrenia stabilized on clozapine who consumed caffeine 600 mg daily (108817).

CONTRACEPTIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, contraceptive drugs might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Oral contraceptives decrease the rate of caffeine clearance by 40-65% (2714,11737).

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) INHIBITORS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Caffeine is metabolized by CYP1A2. Theoretically, drugs that inhibit CYP1A2 may decrease the rate of caffeine clearance and increase caffeine levels (5051,11741).

DIPYRIDAMOLE (Persantine) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, caffeine might decrease the vasodilatory effects of dipyridamole and interfere with its use prior to stress testing.  Details Caffeine inhibits dipyridamole-induced vasodilation (11770,11772). It is recommended that methylxanthines and methylxanthine-containing products be stopped 24 hours prior to pharmacological stress tests (11770). Methylxanthines appear more likely to interfere with dipyridamole (Persantine) than adenosine-induced stress testing (11771).

DISULFIRAM (Antabuse) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, disulfiram use might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Disulfiram decreases the rate of caffeine clearance (11840).

DIURETIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, using caffeine with diuretic drugs might increase the risk of hypokalemia.  Details Caffeine, especially in excessive amounts, can reduce potassium levels due to stimulation of the sodium-potassium pump (23579,37905,37953,38003,38034). Diuretics can also cause lower potassium levels.

EPHEDRINE Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk for stimulant adverse effects.  Details Use of ephedrine with caffeine can increase the risk of stimulatory adverse effects. There is evidence that using ephedrine with caffeine might increase the risk of serious life-threatening or debilitating adverse effects such as hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, seizures, and death (1275,6486,10307).

ESTROGENS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, estrogens might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Estrogen inhibits caffeine metabolism (2714,23570).

ETHOSUXIMIDE (Zarontin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of ethosuximide and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that caffeine 92.4 mg/kg can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of ethosuximide (23560). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

FELBAMATE (Felbatol) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of felbamate and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that a high dose of caffeine 161.7 mg/kg can decreases the anticonvulsant activity of felbamate (23563). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

FLUCONAZOLE (Diflucan) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, fluconazole might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Fluconazole decreases caffeine clearance by approximately 25% (11022).

FLUTAMIDE (Eulexin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might increase the levels and adverse effects of flutamide.  Details In vitro evidence suggests that caffeine can inhibit the metabolism of flutamide (23553). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

FLUVOXAMINE (Luvox) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, fluvoxamine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Fluvoxamine reduces caffeine metabolism (6370).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Abrupt caffeine withdrawal might increase the levels and adverse effects of lithium.  Details Caffeine has diuretic activity. When abruptly discontinued, caffeine may alter the clearance of lithium (609). There are two case reports of lithium tremor that worsened upon abrupt coffee withdrawal (610) and 6 case reports of elevated serum lithium levels after reducing or eliminating caffeine intake (114665). In one case, a male with schizoaffective disorder stabilized on lithium had an elevated lithium level after reducing his caffeine intake by 87%. At a later date, he increased his caffeine intake by 6-fold, resulting in a subtherapeutic lithium level and a recurrence of psychiatric symptoms (114665).

METFORMIN (Glucophage) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, metformin might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Animal research suggests that metformin can reduce caffeine metabolism (23571). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

METHOXSALEN (Oxsoralen) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, methoxsalen might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Methoxsalen reduces caffeine metabolism (23572).

MEXILETINE (Mexitil) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, mexiletine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Mexiletine reduces caffeine metabolism (1260,11741).

MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITORS (MAOIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk of a hypertensive crisis.  Details Caffeine has been shown to inhibit monoamine oxidase (MAO) A and B in laboratory studies (37724,37877,37912,38108). Concomitant intake of large amounts of caffeine with MAOIs might precipitate a hypertensive crisis (15). In a case report, a patient that consumed 10-12 cups of caffeinated coffee and took the MAOI tranylcypromine presented with severe hypertension (91086). Hypertension was resolved after the patient switched to drinking decaffeinated coffee.

NICOTINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk of hypertension.  Details Concomitant use of caffeine and nicotine has been shown to have additive cardiovascular effects, including increased heart rate and blood pressure. Blood pressure was increased by 10.8/12.4 mmHg when the agents were used concomitantly (36549).

PENTOBARBITAL (Nembutal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, caffeine might decrease the effects of pentobarbital.  Details Caffeine might negate the hypnotic effects of pentobarbital (13742).

PHENOBARBITAL (Luminal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of phenobarbital and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of phenobarbital (23558,23559,23561). However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

PHENOTHIAZINES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, phenothiazines might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Phenothiazines, including perazine, chlorpromazine, levomepromazine, and thioridazine, can reduce the metabolism of caffeine by inhibiting cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) (23573,23574).

PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, phenylpropanolamine might increase the risk of hypertension, as well as the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Concomitant use of phenylpropanolamine and caffeine might cause an additive increase in blood pressure (11738). Phenylpropanolamine also seems to increase caffeine serum levels (13743).

PHENYTOIN (Dilantin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of phenytoin and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of phenytoin (23559,23561). The effect does not seem to be related to the seizure threshold-lowering effects of caffeine. However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

PIOGLITAZONE (Actos) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might increase the levels and clinical effects of pioglitazone.  Details Animal research suggests that caffeine can modestly increase the maximum concentration, area under the curve, and half-life of pioglitazone, and also reduce its clearance. This increased the antidiabetic effects of pioglitazone (108812). However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, quinolone antibiotics might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Quinolones (also called fluoroquinolones) can decrease caffeine clearance by inhibiting cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) enzyme (606,607,608,23554,23555,23556).

RILUZOLE (Rilutek) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the levels and adverse effects of both caffeine and riluzole.  Details Caffeine and riluzole are both metabolized by cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2), and concomitant use might reduce the metabolism of one or both agents (11739).

STIMULANT DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, concomitant use might increase stimulant adverse effects.  Details Due to the central nervous system (CNS) stimulant effects of caffeine, concomitant use with stimulant drugs can increase the risk of adverse effects (11832).

TERBINAFINE (Lamisil) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, terbinafine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Terbinafine decreases the clearance of intravenous caffeine by 19% (11740).

THEOPHYLLINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, caffeine might increase the levels and adverse effects of theophylline.  Details Large amounts of caffeine might inhibit theophylline metabolism (11741).

TIAGABINE (Gabitril) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might increase the levels and adverse effects of tiagabine.  Details Animal research suggests that chronic caffeine administration can increase the serum concentrations of tiagabine. However, concomitant use does not seem to reduce the antiepileptic effects of tiagabine (23561).

TICLOPIDINE (Ticlid) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, ticlopidine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details In vitro evidence suggests that ticlopidine can inhibit caffeine metabolism (23557). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

VALPROATE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of valproate and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of valproate (23558,23559,23561,37882). However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, verapamil might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Verapamil increases plasma caffeine concentrations by 25% (11741).

(Read more about CAFFEINE)

ALUMINUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium citrate might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity. Other types of calcium do not increase aluminum absorption.  Details Calcium citrate can increase the absorption of aluminum when taken with aluminum hydroxide. The increase in aluminum levels may become toxic, particularly in individuals with kidney disease (21631). However, the effect of calcium citrate on aluminum absorption is due to the citrate anion rather than calcium cation. Calcium acetate does not appear to increase aluminum absorption (93006).

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.  Details Advise patients to take bisphosphonates at least 30 minutes before calcium, but preferably at a different time of day. Calcium supplements decrease absorption of bisphosphonates (12937).

CALCIPOTRIENE (Dovonex) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Taking calcipotriene with calcium might increase the risk for hypercalcemia.  Details Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (12938). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with calcium supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Intravenous calcium may decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers; oral calcium is unlikely to have this effect.  Details Intravenous calcium is used to decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers in the management of overdose. Intravenous calcium gluconate has been used before intravenous verapamil (Isoptin) to prevent or reduce the hypotensive effects without affecting the antiarrhythmic effects (6124). But there is no evidence that dietary or supplemental calcium when taken orally interacts with calcium channel blockers (12939,12947).

CEFTRIAXONE (Rocephin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Co-administration of intravenous calcium and ceftriaxone can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys.  Details Avoid administering intravenous calcium in any form, such as parenteral nutrition or Lactated Ringers, within 48 hours of intravenous ceftriaxone. Case reports in neonates show that administering intravenous ceftriaxone and calcium can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys. In several cases, neonates have died as a result of this interaction (15794,21632). So far there are no reports in adults; however, there is still concern that this interaction might occur in adults.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Using intravenous calcium with digoxin might increase the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias.  Details Hypercalcemia increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with digoxin (12940). However, one retrospective analysis of clinical data suggests that intravenous calcium does not increase the risk of dysrhythmias or mortality in patients receiving digoxin (38960).

DILTIAZEM (Cardizem, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, calcium might increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of diltiazem.

DOLUTEGRAVIR (Tivicay) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of dolutegravir.  Details Advise patients to take dolutegravir either 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium carbonate 1200 mg concomitantly with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces plasma levels of dolutegravir by almost 40%. Calcium appears to decrease levels of dolutegravir through chelation (93578).

ELVITEGRAVIR (Vitekta) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of elvitegravir.  Details Advise patients to take elvitegravir either 2 hours before or 2 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium along with elvitegravir can reduce blood levels of elvitegravir through chelation (94166).

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption and effectiveness of levothyroxine.  Details Advise patients to take levothyroxine and calcium supplements at least 4 hours apart. Calcium reduces levothyroxine absorption, probably by forming insoluble complexes (5082). Calcium carbonate supplements reduce effectiveness of levothyroxine in patients with hypothyroidism (5081,5082,6137).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use of calcium and lithium may increase this risk of hypercalcemia.  Details Clinical research suggests that long-term use of lithium may cause hypercalcemia in 10% to 60% of patients (38953). Theoretically, concomitant use of lithium and calcium supplements may further increase this risk.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of quinolone antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral quinolones at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements or calcium-fortified foods. Taking calcium at the same time as oral quinolones can reduce quinolone absorption. Calcium binds to quinolones in the gut (4412,10339,21638,38570).

RALTEGRAVIR (Isentress) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium may reduce levels of raltegravir.  Details Pharmacokinetic research shows that taking a single dose of calcium carbonate 3000 mg along with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily modestly decreases the mean area under the curve of raltegravir, but the decrease does not necessitate a dose adjustment of raltegravir (94164). However, a case of elevated HIV-1 RNA levels and documented resistance to raltegravir has been reported for a patient taking calcium carbonate 1 gram three times daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU three times daily in combination with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 11 months. It is thought that calcium reduced raltegravir levels by chelation, leading to treatment failure (94165).

SOTALOL (Betapace) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of sotalol.  Details Advise patients to separate doses by at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium. Calcium appears to reduce the absorption of sotalol, probably by forming insoluble complexes (10018).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral tetracyclines at least 2 hours before, or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements. Taking calcium at the same time as oral tetracyclines can reduce tetracycline absorption. Calcium binds to tetracyclines in the gut (1843).

THIAZIDE DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Taking calcium along with thiazides might increase the risk of hypercalcemia and renal failure.  Details Thiazides reduce calcium excretion by the kidneys (1902). Using thiazides along with moderately large amounts of calcium carbonate increases the risk of milk-alkali syndrome (hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis, renal failure). Patients may need to have their serum calcium levels and/or parathyroid function monitored regularly.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, use of calcium supplements may increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of verapamil.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

ANTICHOLINERGIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, deanol might decrease the effectiveness of anticholinergic drugs.  Details Deanol is thought to increase acetylcholine levels (1669).

CHOLINERGIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, deanol might increase the effects and adverse effects of cholinergic drugs.  Details Deanol is thought to increase acetylcholine levels (1669).

(Read more about DEANOL)

ACE INHIBITORS (ACEIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Using ACEIs with high doses of potassium increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details ACEIs block the actions of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and reduce potassium excretion (95628). Concomitant use of these drugs with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15,23207). However, concomitant use of these drugs with moderate dietary potassium intake (about 3775-5200 mg daily) does not increase serum potassium levels (95628).

ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKERS (ARBs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Using ARBs with high doses of potassium increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details ARBs block the actions of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and reduce potassium excretion (95628). Concomitant use of these drugs with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15,23207). However, concomitant use of these drugs with moderate dietary potassium intake (about 3775-5200 mg daily) does not increase serum potassium levels (95628).

POTASSIUM-SPARING DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Concomitant use increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details Using potassium-sparing diuretics with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = A Theoretically, a high intake of dietary sodium might reduce the effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs.  Details High intake of dietary sodium can increase systolic and diastolic blood pressure (26222). Also, high intake of sodium may necessitate increased use of antihypertensive medications to achieve blood pressure control in some patients, such as those with chronic kidney disease (26223).

CORTICOSTEROIDS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids with sodium supplements might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids (corticosteroids) cause sodium retention. This effect is dose-related and depends on mineralocorticoid potency. It is most common with hydrocortisone, cortisone, and fludrocortisone, followed by prednisone and prednisolone (4425).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Altering dietary intake of sodium might alter the levels and clinical effects of lithium.  Details High sodium intake can reduce plasma concentrations of lithium by increasing lithium excretion (26225). Reducing sodium intake can significantly increase plasma concentrations of lithium and cause lithium toxicity in patients being treated with lithium carbonate (26224,26225). Stabilizing sodium intake is shown to reduce the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L (112909). Patients taking lithium should avoid significant alterations in their dietary intake of sodium.

SODIUM-CONTAINING DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of sodium-containing drugs with additional sodium from dietary or supplemental sources may increase the risk of hypernatremia and long-term sodium-related complications.  Details The Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams of sodium daily indicates the intake at which it is believed that chronic disease risk increases for the apparently healthy population (100310). Some medications contain high quantities of sodium. When used in conjunction with sodium supplements or high-sodium diets, the CDRR may be exceeded. Additionally, concomitant use may increase the risk for hypernatremia; this risk is highest in the elderly and people with other risk factors for electrolyte disturbances.

TOLVAPTAN (Samsca) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, concomitant use of tolvaptan with sodium might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Tolvaptan is a vasopressin receptor 2 antagonist that is used to increase sodium levels in patients with hyponatremia (29406). Patients taking tolvaptan should use caution with the use of sodium salts such as sodium chloride.

(Read more about SODIUM)

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, stevia might increase the risk for hypoglycemia when combined with antidiabetes drugs.  Details Preliminary clinical research in patients with type 2 diabetes suggests that taking a single dose of stevia extract 1000 mg reduces postprandial blood glucose levels when taken with a meal (11812). However, other clinical research in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes suggests that taking stevioside 250 mg three times daily does not significantly affect blood glucose levels or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) after three months of treatment (16705).

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, combining stevia or stevia constituents with antihypertensive agents might increase the risk of hypotension.  Details Stevia extract and stevioside might lower blood pressure in patients with hypertension (3745,3747,5031,11809,11810). However, other clinical research suggests that stevioside does not significantly lower blood pressure in patients with hypertension (16706).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, stevia might decrease clearance and increase levels of lithium.  Details Animal research suggests that stevia extracts might have diuretic activity (3746,3747). Theoretically, increased reabsorption of lithium along with sodium might reduce excretion and increase levels of lithium.

(Read more about STEVIA)

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theanine might lower blood pressure, potentiating the effects of antihypertensive drugs.  Details Animal research shows that theanine can lower blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive animals (7687,77354). Theoretically, concomitant use of theanine and antihypertensive drugs might potentiate the antihypertensive activity.

CNS DEPRESSANTS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, theanine might have additive sedative effects when used in conjunction with CNS depressants. However, it is unclear if this concern is clinically relevant.  Details Theoretically, theanine may compete with glutamate and/or increase plasma gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels, which could cause CNS depression (96334). In one clinical study, some subjects taking oral theanine reported drowsiness (96331).

(Read more about THEANINE)

LEVODOPA Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, tyrosine might decrease the effectiveness of levodopa.  Details Tyrosine and levodopa compete for absorption in the proximal duodenum by the large neutral amino acid (LNAA) transport system (2719). Advise patients to separate doses of tyrosine and levodopa by at least 2 hours.

THYROID HORMONE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, tyrosine might have additive effects with thyroid hormone medications.  Details Tyrosine is a precursor to thyroxine and might increase levels of thyroid hormones (7212).

(Read more about TYROSINE)

General ...Orally, 5-HTP is generally well tolerated, short-term.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, anorexia, dizziness, diarrhea, drowsiness, fatigue, headache, insomnia, nausea, and vomiting. Severity appears to be dose-dependent.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Aggression, hallucinations, mania, severe gastrointestinal complaints.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, palpitations have been reported with 5-HTP (30076,30130,30167). Conversely, bradycardia has been reported in patients taking 5-HTP 0.4-2 grams daily in combination with carbidopa 100-300 mg daily (30132). In patients with schizophrenia, a combination of 5-HTP in doses up to 6 grams daily and carbidopa 150 mg daily was associated with diaphoresis and mild diastolic hypotension, especially when doses were increased at a rate faster than 200 mg per day (30183).

Dermatologic ...Orally, 5-HTP has been reported to cause urticaria, other allergic-type skin reactions, and flushing (2204,30000,30140). A scleroderma-like illness was reported in a 70-year-old man who had been taking 5-HTP 1400 mg daily and carbidopa 150 mg daily for 20 months. Elevated serotonin levels may be linked to this condition (1403).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, 5-HTP has been reported to cause gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal or epigastric pain, heartburn, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, anorexia, and taste alteration at any dose (2203,2204,30000,30112,30114,30125,30132,30139,30140)(30165,30183,104250). Severity may be dose-dependent and also related to how quickly doses are increased (30183). Some data suggests that these effects may diminish or disappear with continued use of 5-HTP (30132).

Hematologic ...Symptoms suggestive of eosinophilia myalgia syndrome (EMS) have been reported in some patients using 5-HTP (902,10084,30178,88174,90927). In one case, a woman was exposed to 5-HTP, tetrahydrobiopterin, carbidopa, and levodopa while administering them to her children for 2 years (90927). Her diagnosis was not confirmed, and the validity of the tests performed on the 5-HTP product has been questioned (88174). Other cases of eosinophilia or EMS in patients taking 5-HTP have been attributed to impurities that resemble previously identified contaminants found in L-tryptophan products (902,919,7067,10084). The L-tryptophan contaminants associated with EMS were linked to a specific manufacturer's production method that is not used in the preparation of 5-HTP (88174). Although 5-HTP supplements have been associated with EMS, it seems that this adverse effect is likely due to the presence of contaminants in the 5-HTP products, not 5-HTP itself.

Musculoskeletal ...Orally, rhabdomyolysis was noted in one patient with progressive myoclonus epilepsy who was treated with 5-HTP 300 mg daily for 21 days (30162).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, 5-HTP has been reported to cause drowsiness, dizziness, insomnia, fatigue, and headache (30076,30112,30132).

Psychiatric ...Orally, 5-HTP has been associated with euphoria, hypomania and mania, anxiety, insomnia, and aggressiveness (30076,30132,30158,88179). In patients with schizophrenia, a combination of high-dose 5-HTP, up to 6 grams daily, and carbidopa 150 mg daily was associated with transient increases in hallucinations, delusions, marked confusion, looseness of associations, flight of ideas, and a hyperkinetic syndrome consisting of restlessness, hand wringing, pacing, and an inability to sit quietly in a chair (30183).

(Read more about 5-HTP)

General ...Orally, beet seems to be well tolerated when used for medicinal purposes, short term.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Red stools and red urine.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Hypocalcemia and kidney damage when ingested in large amounts.

Endocrine ...Theoretically, ingestion of large quantities of beets could lead to hypocalcemia because of the oxaluric acid content (18).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, beet juice may cause red stools (94470,97726,100142,100145,105762). This red coloring of the stools is not harmful. Additionally, beet supplementation has been reported to cause black stools. In one case, a 79-year-old male on apixaban and clopidogrel presented with black stools, nausea, and vomiting after taking beet pills 2-3 days prior. The likelihood of upper gastrointestinal bleed was determined to be low based on factors such as normal vital signs and lack of severe anemia. The patient was diagnosed with beet-induced pseudo-hematochezia which was successfully treated with fluids and discontinuation of the beet supplement (113426).
Other less common gastrointestinal side effects include loose stools, constipation, and nausea (100149).

Genitourinary ...Orally, beet is known to produce red or pink urine (beeturia) in some people (32569,34134,94464,94470,97725,97726,100142,100145,100152,105762,113422). However, this red coloring of the urine is not harmful and dissipates after about 12 hours (113422).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, vivid dreams and worsening headaches have each occurred in one person in a clinical trial, although it is not clear if this is due to beet (97723).

Renal ...Theoretically, ingestion of large quantities of beets could lead to kidney damage due to its oxaluric acid content (18).

(Read more about BEET)

General ...Orally, beta-alanine seems to be generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Flushing, paresthesia.

Gastrointestinal ...While rare, digestion problems have been reported with oral beta-alanine use (94341).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, beta-alanine can cause a dose-dependent feeling of pins and needles (paresthesias) along with skin flushing (16438,94333,94335,94338,94341,94342,94349,101028,101029,106711). This generally starts on the scalp within 20 minutes of the dose, spreading to most of the body, and lasting for about an hour. This was described as severe at a dose of 40 mg/kg, tolerable at a dose of 20 mg/kg, and very mild at a dose of 10 mg/kg. At the lowest dose it only occurred in 25% of subjects (16438). In some studies, beta-alanine has been given as frequently as 8 times per day so that each dose can be kept below 10 mg/kg (16438,16439). Other clinical research shows that taking beta-alanine in a tablet formulation eliminates the presence of parasthesias at a dose of 1.6 grams when compared with a solution made from powdered beta-alanine. This effect may be due to delayed absorption (97974,97975). Although paresthesias still occur with sustained-release formulations, their presence is less frequent when compared with immediate-release formulations (101029).

(Read more about BETA-ALANINE)

General ...Caffeine in moderate doses is typically well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Anxiety, dependence with chronic use, diarrhea, diuresis, gastric irritation, headache, insomnia, muscular tremors, nausea, and restlessness.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Stroke has been reported rarely.

Cardiovascular ...Caffeine can temporarily increase blood pressure. Usually, blood pressure increases 30 minutes after ingestion, peaks in 1-2 hours, and remains elevated for over 4 hours (36539,37732,37989,38000,38300).
Although acute administration of caffeine can cause increased blood pressure, regular consumption does not seem to increase either blood pressure or pulse, even in mildly hypertensive patients (1451,1452,2722,38335). However, the form of caffeine may play a role in blood pressure increase after a more sustained caffeine use. In a pooled analysis of clinical trials, coffee intake was not associated with an increase in blood pressure, while ingesting caffeine 410 mg daily for at least 7 days modestly increased blood pressure by an average of 4.16/2.41 mmHg (37657). Another meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking caffeine increases systolic and diastolic blood pressure by approximately 2 mmHg when compared with control. Preliminary subgroup analyses suggest that caffeine may increase blood pressure more in males or at doses over 400 mg (112738).
When used prior to intensive exercise, caffeine can increase systolic blood pressure by 7-8 mmHg (38308). The blood pressure-raising effects of caffeine are greater during stress (36479,38334) and after caffeine-abstinence of at least 24 hours (38241).
Epidemiological research suggests there is no association of caffeine consumption with incidence of hypertension (38190). Habitual coffee consumption also doesn't seem to be related to hypertension, but habitual consumption of sugared or diet cola is associated with development of hypertension (13739).
Epidemiological research has found that regular caffeine intake of up to 400 mg daily is not associated with increased incidence of atrial fibrillation (38018,38076,91028,91034,97451,97453,103708), atherosclerosis (38033), cardiac ectopy (91127), stroke (37804), ventricular arrhythmia (95948,97453), and cardiovascular disease in general (37805,98806). One clinical trial shows that in adults with diagnosed heart failure, consumption of 500 mg of coffee does not result in an increased risk for arrhythmia during exercise (95950). However, caffeine intake may pose a greater cardiovascular risk to subjects that are not regular users of caffeine. For example, in one population study, caffeinated coffee consumption was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke in subjects that don't regularly drink coffee (38102). In a population study in Japanese subjects, caffeine-containing medication use was modestly associated with hemorrhagic stroke in adults that do not consume caffeine regularly (91059).
The most common side effect of caffeine in neonates receiving caffeine for apnea is tachycardia (98807,114658).

Dermatologic ...There are several case reports of urticaria after caffeine ingestion (36546,36448,36475).

Endocrine ...Some evidence shows caffeine is associated with fibrocystic breast disease or breast cancer in females; however, this is controversial since findings are conflicting (8043,108806). Restricting caffeine in females with fibrocystic breast conditions doesn't seem to affect breast nodularity, swelling, or pain (8996). A population analysis of the Women's Health Initiative observational study has found no association between consumption of caffeine-containing beverages and the incidence of invasive breast cancer in models adjusted for demographic, lifestyle, and reproductive factors (108806). Also, a dose-response analysis of 2 low-quality observational studies has found that high consumption of caffeine is not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (108807).
Clinical research in healthy adults shows that an increase consumption of caffeine results in increased insulin resistance (91023).

Gastrointestinal ...Gastrointestinal upset, nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and fecal incontinence may occur with caffeine intake (36466,37755,37806,37789,37830,38138,38136,38223,95956,95963). Also, caffeine may cause feeding intolerance and gastrointestinal irritation in infants (6023). Perioperative caffeine during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery seems to increase the rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting (97451). Caffeine and coffee consumption have been associated with an increase in the incidence of heartburn (37545,37575,38251,38259,38267) and gastrointestinal esophageal reflux disease (GERD) (38329,37633,37631,37603).

Genitourinary ...Caffeine, a known diuretic, may increase voiding, give a sense of urgency, and irritate the bladder (37874,37961,104580). In men with lower urinary tract symptoms, caffeine intake increased the risk of interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (38115). Excessive caffeine consumption may worsen premenstrual syndrome. Consumption of up to 10 cups of caffeinated drinks daily was associated with increased severity of premenstrual syndrome (38177). Finally, population research shows that exposure to caffeine was not associated with an increased risk of endometriosis (91035).

Immunologic ...Caffeine can cause anaphylaxis in sensitive individuals, although true IgE-mediated caffeine allergy seems to be relatively rare (11315).

Musculoskeletal ...Caffeine can induce or exacerbate muscular tremors (38136,37673,38161). There has also been a report of severe rhabdomyolysis in a healthy 40-year-old patient who consumed an energy drink containing 400 mg of caffeine (4 mg/kg) and then participated in strenuous weightlifting exercise (108818).
Epidemiological evidence regarding the relationship between caffeine use and the risk for osteoporosis is contradictory. Caffeine can release calcium from storage sites and increase its urinary excretion (2669,10202,11317,111489). Females with a genetic variant of the vitamin D receptor appear to be at an increased risk for the detrimental effect of caffeine on bone mass (2669). However, moderate caffeine intake, less than 300 mg daily, does not seem to significantly increase osteoporosis risk in most postmenopausal adults with normal calcium intake (2669,6025,10202,11317). Premature infants treated with intravenous caffeine for apnea of prematurity, have a lower bone mineral content compared with infants who are not treated with caffeine, especially when treatment extends beyond 14 days (111489).

Neurologic/CNS ...Caffeine can cause headaches, anxiety, jitteriness, restlessness, and nervousness (36466,37694,37755,37806,37865,37830,37889,38223,95952). In adolescents, there is an inverse correlation between the consumption of caffeine and various measurements of cognitive function (104579). Insomnia is a frequent adverse effect in children (10755). Caffeine may result in insomnia and sleep disturbances in adults as well (36445,36483,36512,36531,37598,37795,37819,37862,37864,37890)(37968,37971,38091,38242,91022,92952). Additionally, caffeine may exacerbate sleep disturbances in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) (10204). Combining ephedra with caffeine can increase the risk of adverse effects. Jitteriness, hypertension, seizures, temporary loss of consciousness, and hospitalization requiring life support has been associated with the combined use of ephedra and caffeine (2729). Finally, epidemiological research suggests that consuming more than 190 mg of caffeine daily is associated with an earlier onset of Huntington disease by 3.6 years (91078).

Ocular/Otic ...In individuals with glaucoma, coffee consumption and caffeine intake has been found to increase intraocular pressure (8540,36464,36465,37670). The magnitude of this effect seems to depend on individual tolerance to caffeine. Some research in healthy young adults shows that caffeine increases intraocular pressure to a greater degree in low-consumers of caffeine (i.e., 1 cup of coffee or less daily) when compared to high-consumers (i.e., those consuming 2 cups of coffee or more daily) (100371). The peak increase of intraocular pressure seems to occur at about 1.5 hours after caffeine ingestion, and there is no notable effect 4 hours after ingestion (36462,100371).

Oncologic ...Most human studies which have examined caffeine or methylxanthine intake have found that they do not play a role in the development of various cancers, including breast, ovarian, brain, colon, rectal, or bladder cancer (37641,37737,37775,37900,38050,38169,38220,91054,91076,108806).

Psychiatric ...Caffeine may lead to habituation and physical dependence (36355,36453,36512,36599), with amounts as low as 100 mg daily (36355,36453). An estimated 9% to 30% of caffeine consumers could be considered addicted to caffeine (36355). Higher doses of caffeine have caused nervousness, agitation, anxiety, irritability, delirium, depression, sleep disturbances, impaired attention, manic behavior, psychosis and panic attacks (36505,37717,37818,37839,37857,37982,38004,38017,38028,38072)(38079,38138,38306,38325,38331,38332,97464). Similar symptoms have been reported in a caffeine-naïve individual experiencing fatigue and dehydration after a dose of only 200 mg, with resolution of symptoms occurring within 2 hours (95952).
Withdrawal: The existence or clinical importance of caffeine withdrawal is controversial. Some researchers think that if it exists, it appears to be of little clinical significance (11839). Headache is the most common symptom, due to cerebral vasodilation and increased blood flow (37769,37991,37998). Other researchers suggest symptoms such as tiredness and fatigue, decreased energy, alertness and attentiveness, drowsiness, decreased contentedness, depressed mood, difficulty concentration, irritability, and lack of clear-headedness are typical of caffeine withdrawal (13738). Withdrawal symptoms typically occur 12-24 hours after the last dose of caffeine and peak around 48 hours (37769,36600). Symptoms may persist for 2-9 days. Withdrawal symptoms such as delirium, nausea, vomiting, rhinorrhea, nervousness, restlessness, anxiety, muscle tension, muscle pains, and flushed face have been described. However, these symptoms may be from nonpharmacological factors related to knowledge and expectation of effects. Clinically significant symptoms caused by caffeine withdrawal may be uncommon (2723,11839). In a case report, caffeine consumption of 560 mg daily was associated with increased suicidality (91082).

Renal ...Data on the relationship between caffeine intake and kidney stones are conflicting. Some clinical research shows that caffeine consumption may increase the risk of stone formation (37634,111498), while other research shows a reduced risk with increasing caffeine intakes (111498). A meta-analysis of 7 studies found that overall, there is an inverse relationship, with a 32% decrease in the risk of kidney stones between the lowest and highest daily intakes of caffeine (111498).

Other ...People with voice disorders, singers, and other voice professionals are often advised against the use of caffeine; however, this recommendation has been based on anecdotal evidence. One small exploratory study suggests that caffeine ingestion may adversely affect subjective voice quality, although there appears to be significant intra-individual variability. Further study is necessary to confirm these preliminary findings (2724).

(Read more about CAFFEINE)

General ...Orally and intravenously, calcium is well-tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Belching, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, and stomach upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about calciphylaxis and kidney stones.

Cardiovascular ...There has been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these results, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and CVD, CHD, or MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482). To minimize the possible risk of CVD, CHD, or MI, advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). While dietary intake of calcium is preferred over supplemental intake, advise patients who require calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D, as this combination does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI (93533).
Rarely, calcium intake can increase the risk of calciphylaxis, which usually occurs in patients with kidney failure. Calciphylaxis is the deposition of calcium phosphate in arterioles, which causes skin ulcers and skin necrosis. In a case report, a 64-year-old female with a history of neck fracture, sepsis, and ischemic colitis presented with painful leg ulcers due to calciphylaxis. She discontinued calcium and vitamin D supplementation and was treated with sodium thiosulfate and supportive care (95816).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, calcium can cause belching, flatulence, nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, and diarrhea (1824,1843,12950,38803). Although constipation is frequently cited as an adverse effect of calcium, there is no scientific substantiation of this side effect (1824,1843,1844,1845,12950,38978). Calcium carbonate has been reported to cause acid rebound, but this is controversial (12935,12936).

Oncologic ...There is some concern that very high doses of calcium might increase the risk of prostate cancer. Some epidemiological evidence suggests that consuming over 2000 mg/day of dietary calcium might increase the risk for prostate cancer (4825,12949). Additional research suggests that calcium intake over 1500 mg/day might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer and prostate cancer mortality (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a small increase in prostate cancer risk (98894). However, contradictory research suggests no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall prostate cancer risk (14131,14132,104630). More evidence is needed to determine the effect of calcium, if any, on prostate cancer risk.

Renal ...Kidney stones have been reported in individuals taking calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily in combination with vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 4 years (93943).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

General ...Orally, deanol seems to be well tolerated (1668,1671,1672,1673,1674,1675,1676,1679,1680,1681). However, deanol has been reported to cause constipation, diarrhea, urticaria, headache, drowsiness, insomnia, overstimulation, lucid dreams, confusion, motor retardation, depression, hypomania, and an increase in schizophrenia symptoms (1674,1680,1684,1685,1686,2706).
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal cramps, abdominal pain, diarrhea, drowsiness, nausea, vomiting.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, small elevations in blood pressure have been reported in some patients taking deanol up to 1800 mg daily. These effects improved after deanol discontinuation (1680).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, deanol has been reported to cause diarrhea, abdominal cramps, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting (1674,1680).

Musculoskeletal ...Orally, deanol up to 1800 mg daily has been reported to cause motor retardation in a small number of patients. This effect improved after deanol discontinuation (1680).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, deanol has been reported to cause drowsiness, apathy, and confusion (1674,1680). In one case report, a physician promoted the use of deanol to induce lucid dreams, which may be considered an undesirable outcome for some patients (1686).

Psychiatric ...Orally, taking deanol at doses greater than 1000 mg daily has been reported to cause mood changes, including depression and hypomania, in patients with psychiatric conditions (1685). Deanol 1500 mg daily has been reported to increase schizophrenic symptoms in patients with chronic schizophrenia (1674).

(Read more about DEANOL)

General ...Orally or intravenously, potassium is generally well-tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, belching, diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, and vomiting.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
All ROAs: High potassium levels can cause arrhythmia, heart block, hypotension, and mental confusion.

Cardiovascular ...Orally or intravenously, high potassium levels can cause hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, heart block, or cardiac arrest (15,16,3385,95011,95626,95630).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally or intravenously, high doses of potassium can cause, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and flatulence (95010,95011). Bleeding duodenal ulcers have also been associated with ingestion of slow-release potassium tablets (69625,69672).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally or intravenously, high potassium levels can cause paresthesia, generalized weakness, flaccid paralysis, listlessness, vertigo, or mental confusion (15,16,3385,95011).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

General ...Orally, sodium is well tolerated when used in moderation at intakes up to the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level. Topically, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Worsened cardiovascular disease, hypertension, kidney disease.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, intake of sodium above the CDRR intake level can exacerbate hypertension and hypertension-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) (26229,98176,100310,106263). A meta-analysis of observational research has found a linear association between increased sodium intake and increased hypertension risk (109398). Observational research has also found an association between increased sodium salt intake and increased risk of CVD, mortality, and cardiovascular mortality (98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,109395,109396,109399). However, the existing research is unable to confirm a causal relationship between sodium intake and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; high-quality, prospective research is needed to clarify this relationship (100312). As there is no known benefit with increased salt intake that would outweigh the potential increased risk of CVD, advise patients to limit salt intake to no more than the CDRR intake level (100310).
A reduction in sodium intake can lower systolic blood pressure by a small amount in most individuals, and diastolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension (100310,100311,106261). However, post hoc analysis of a small crossover clinical study in White patients suggests that 24-hour blood pressure variability is not affected by high-salt intake compared with low-salt intake (112910). Additionally, the available research is insufficient to confirm that a further reduction in sodium intake below the CDRR intake level will lower the risk for chronic disease (100310,100311). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that reducing sodium intake increases levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides, but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, by a small amount (106261).
It is unclear whether there are safety concerns when sodium is consumed in amounts lower than the adequate intake (AI) levels. Some observational research has found that the lowest levels of sodium intake might be associated with increased risk of death and cardiovascular events (98181,98183). However, this finding has been criticized because some of the studies used inaccurate measures of sodium intake, such as the Kawasaki formula (98177,98178,101259). Some observational research has found that sodium intake based on a single 24-hour urinary measurement is inversely correlated with all-cause mortality (106260). The National Academies Consensus Study Report states that there is insufficient evidence from observational studies to conclude that there are harmful effects from low sodium intake (100310).

Endocrine ...Orally, a meta-analysis of observational research has found that higher sodium intake is associated with an average increase in body mass index (BMI) of 1. 24 kg/m2 and an approximate 5 cm increase in waist circumference (98182). It has been hypothesized that the increase in BMI is related to an increased thirst, resulting in an increased intake of sugary beverages and/or consumption of foods that are high in salt and also high in fat and energy (98182). One large observational study has found that the highest sodium intake is not associated with overweight or obesity when compared to the lowest intake in adolescents aged 12-19 years when intake of energy and sugar-sweetened beverages are considered (106265). However, in children aged 6-11 years, usual sodium intake is positively associated with increased weight and central obesity independently of the intake of energy and/or sugar-sweetened beverages (106265).

Gastrointestinal ...In one case report, severe gastritis and a deep antral ulcer occurred in a patient who consumed 16 grams of sodium chloride in one sitting (25759). Chronic use of high to moderately high amounts of sodium chloride has been associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer (29405).

Musculoskeletal ...Observational research has found that low sodium levels can increase the risk for osteoporosis. One study has found that low plasma sodium levels are associated with an increased risk for osteoporosis. Low levels, which are typically caused by certain disease states or chronic medications, are associated with a more than 2-fold increased odds for osteoporosis and bone fractures (101260).
Conversely, in healthy males on forced bed rest, a high intake of sodium chloride (7.7 mEq/kg daily) seems to exacerbate disuse-induced bone and muscle loss (25760,25761).

Oncologic ...Population research has found that high or moderately high intake of sodium chloride is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer when compared with low sodium chloride intake (29405). Other population research in patients with gastric cancer has found that a high intake of sodium is associated with an approximate 65% increased risk of gastric cancer mortality when compared with a low intake. When zinc intake is taken into consideration, the increased risk of mortality only occurred in those with low zinc intake, but the risk was increased to approximately 2-fold in this sub-population (109400).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...In patients with hypertension, population research has found that sodium excretion is modestly and positively associated with having moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea. This association was not found in normotensive patients (106262).

Renal ...Increased sodium intake has been associated with impaired kidney function in healthy adults. This effect seems to be independent of blood pressure. Observational research has found that a high salt intake over approximately 5 years is associated with a 29% increased risk of developing impaired kidney function when compared with a lower salt intake. In this study, high salt intake was about 2-fold higher than low salt intake (101261).

(Read more about SODIUM)

General ...Orally, stevia and steviol glycosides appear to be well tolerated. Most minor adverse effects seem to resolve after the first week of use.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Abdominal bloating, dizziness, headache, myalgia, nausea, and numbness.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Allergic reactions.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, stevia and steviol glycosides such as stevioside, can cause gastrointestinal adverse effects such as abdominal fullness and nausea. However, these generally resolve after the first week of use (11809,11810).

Immunologic ...Theoretically, stevia might cause allergic reactions in individuals sensitive to plants in the Asteraceae/Compositae family (11811). Members of this family include ragweed, chrysanthemums, marigolds, daisies, and many other herbs.

Musculoskeletal ...Orally, stevia and steviol glycosides may cause myalgia, but this generally resolves after the first week of use (11809,11810).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, stevia and steviol glycosides may cause headache, dizziness, and numbness (11809,11810).

(Read more about STEVIA)

General ...Orally, L-theanine seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Drowsiness, headaches.

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, L-theanine may cause headaches (36439). Patients have also reported drowsiness, increased duration of sleep, and increased dream activity after oral L-theanine use (96331).
A case of subtle facial tic starting within 4 days of taking L-theanine 400 mg daily has been reported for a pediatric patient. Although the tics reportedly ceased once theanine was discontinued, the child had exhibited tics in the past. Therefore, the adverse effect was not thought to be related to L-theanine (91744).

(Read more about THEANINE)

General ...Orally, tyrosine seems to be well tolerated. No serious adverse effects have been documented; however, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Fatigue, headache, heartburn, and nausea.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, tyrosine can cause nausea and heartburn when taken at a dose of 150 mg/kg (7211). Taking tyrosine 4 grams daily in combination with 5-hydroxytryptophan 800 mg and carbidopa 100 mg can cause diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. These effects can be mitigated by lowering the dosage (918).

Musculoskeletal ...Orally, larger doses of tyrosine (150 mg/kg) can cause arthralgia, but this is uncommon (7211).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, larger doses of tyrosine (150 mg/kg) can cause headache and fatigue (7211). Taking a combination of tyrosine 4 grams, 5-hydroxytryptophan 800 mg, and carbidopa 100 mg can cause drowsiness and agitation. These effects can be mitigated by lowering the dosage (918).

(Read more about TYROSINE)