Fresh Flax Oil by Barlean's

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Hyperlipidemia. Clinical research suggests that alpha-linolenic acid does not lower lipid levels in adults with hyperlipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of 20 small clinical trials in patients with hyperlipidemia shows that taking foods or supplements containing alpha-linolenic acid does not reduce lipid levels when compared with control (104256). The findings from this analysis are limited by the heterogeneity of the alpha-linolenic acid supplementation regimens and patient populations.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Atherosclerosis. Some research suggests that increasing dietary alpha-linolenic acid intake may decrease atherosclerosis. Details: Epidemiological research in White adults has found that high dietary intake of linolenic acid is associated with reduced calcified atherosclerotic plaques in the coronary arteries. Most dietary linolenic acid is alpha-linolenic acid (only a small fraction is gamma-linolenic acid). For every gram of linolenic acid consumed, risk of coronary artery calcification appears to decrease by 62% (12990). The effects of linolenic acid intake in other populations are unclear.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for atopic dermatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if alpha-linolenic acid is beneficial in patients with ADHD. Details: Small clinical trials show that taking alpha-linolenic acid does not improve symptoms of previously untreated ADHD in children aged 6-16 years. Taking alpha-linolenic acid 1 gram daily for 8 weeks, or taking a combination of alpha-linolenic acid 60 mg, linoleic acid 240 mg, mineral oil 95 mg, and alpha-tocopherol 5 mg twice daily for 7 weeks does not affect ADHD symptom scores when compared with placebo (100660,100661). However, these studies might have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Cancer. It is unclear if increased dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid affects mortality in patients with cancer. Details: A large meta-analysis of prospective, observational studies has found that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid is associated with a 6% increased risk of mortality from cancer when compared with low dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid (106661).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Population research has found that increased dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid may have some benefit for CVD, but results from clinical research are generally less positive. Details: A large meta-analysis of prospective, observational studies has found that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid is associated with an 8% or 11% reduced risk of mortality from CVD or coronary heart disease (CHD), respectively, when compared with low dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid. A dose-response analysis and meta-analysis show that a 1-gram increase in daily dietary intake is associated with a 5% reduction in CVD mortality (106661,107741). Other population research has found that consumption of 1-2 grams of dietary alpha-linolenic acid daily is associated with a reduced risk of a first myocardial infarction (MI) by as much as 59% in both males and females (7152,7156). The risk of fatal ischemic heart disease is reduced by 65% in females (7153). In patients who have had a previous MI, following a Mediterranean diet rich in alpha-linolenic acid (1.2-1.6 grams daily) and low in saturated fat and cholesterol for 27 months appears to reduce the risk for a second MI by 73% and the risk for death from any cause by 70% when compared to the standard postinfarction diet (7150). Overall, increasing dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid by 1-1.2 grams daily appears to reduce the risk of fatal coronary heart disease by 20% in people with no history of heart disease and by 20% or more in people with existing heart disease (12978,91403). However, clinical research has not supported these findings. A meta-analysis of a small number of low to moderate quality clinical studies shows that higher intake of alpha-linolenic acid has little to no benefit for primary prevention of CVD, and does not reduce all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, or CHD events. Any reductions in CVD mortality, arrhythmias, or CHD events in individual trials are very small (103955). This may be due in part to the difficulty in separating the effects of alpha-linolenic acid from those of other dietary, lifestyle, or drug interventions (12917). Some research suggests alpha-linolenic acid has a greater effect on coronary heart disease when intake of fish oils is low (12989).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for COPD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral alpha-linolenic acid improves cognitive function in healthy adults.
• Crohn disease. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for Crohn disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Crohn disease. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for Crohn disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral alpha-linolenic acid is beneficial in patients with depression. Details: Clinical research in patients aged 60-80 years who have had a myocardial infarction shows that consuming margarine containing alpha-linolenic acid 2 grams daily for 40 months does not reduce symptoms of depression when compared with placebo margarine (104978).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral alpha-linolenic acid is beneficial in patients with diabetes. Details: Epidemiological research involving overweight and obese individuals has found that eating at least 1.69 grams alpha-linolenic acid daily is associated with a 45% to 47% reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with eating only 0.73 grams daily. However, higher intake of alpha-linolenic acid does not appear to be associated with a reduced risk of diabetes in people who are not overweight (101025). In patients with diabetes, epidemiological research shows that lower intake of alpha-linolenic acid is associated with an increased risk of diabetic nephropathy (101024). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research in adults with diabetes who are stable on oral antidiabetic medications shows that adding alpha-linolenic acid 1.5-7.4 grams daily, in the form of flaxseed oil, walnuts, or chia seeds, to a regular diet for 2-12 months does not improve glycemic control when compared with placebo (98002).
• Influenza. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for influenza, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Hypertension. Some research suggests that increasing dietary alpha-linolenic acid may decrease the risk of hypertension. Details: Epidemiological research has found that high dietary intake of linolenic acid is associated with a reduced risk of hypertension in White adults. Most dietary linolenic acid is alpha-linolenic acid (only a small fraction is gamma-linolenic acid). Eating a diet high in linolenic acid seems to reduce the risk of hypertension by about 33% (12991). The effects of linolenic acid intake in other populations are unclear.
• Kidney transplant. Observational research suggests that alpha-linolenic acid is not beneficial after a kidney transplant, and may actually increase the risk of mortality. Details: Epidemiological research has found that dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid is not associated with improved graft function in kidney transplant. However, kidney transplant recipients in the highest tertile of alpha-linolenic acid intake appear to have a 2.2-fold increased risk of death from any cause when compared with those in the lowest tertile of dietary intake (98003). It is not clear whether this difference is specifically due to alpha-linolenic acid intake or to total fat intake.
• Migraine headache. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for migraine headache, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Multiple sclerosis. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for MS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if increased dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid affects all-cause mortality. Details: A large meta-analysis of prospective, observational studies has found that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid is associated with a 10% reduced risk of all-cause mortality when compared with low dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid. A dose-response analysis shows that a 1-gram increase in daily dietary intake is associated with a 5% reduction in overall mortality (106661). However, a meta-analysis of 250,000 individuals did not find an association between dietary alpha-linolenic acid intake and all-cause mortality (107741). The validity of this finding is limited by the use of dietary surveys to assess intake and the heterogeneity of the included studies.
• Prostate cancer. There is contradictory evidence about the role of alpha-linolenic acid in prostate cancer. Details: Some epidemiologic research suggests that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid is associated with an increased risk for prostate cancer (1337,2558,7823,7147,12978). Other research suggests high intake or serum levels of alpha-linolenic acid is not associated with increased levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) or the overall risk of prostate cancer (12961,15736,91402). However, it might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer (12961). The best evidence to date, which comes from a meta-analysis of five prospective population studies, suggests that increasing intake of alpha-linolenic acid by 0.5 grams daily is associated with a modest 1% reduction in the risk of prostate cancer. However, this analysis is dominated by a single study. A meta-analysis of results from nine prospective population studies suggests that a 0.1% increase in blood levels of alpha-linolenic acid is not associated with prostate cancer risk (90677). Reasons for the discrepancies are not entirely clear, but the source of alpha-linolenic acid appears to be important. Alpha-linolenic acid from dairy and meat sources has been positively associated with prostate cancer. Alpha-linolenic acid from plant sources, such as flaxseed, may not affect prostate cancer risk (12909).
• Pneumonia. It is unclear if dietary alpha-linolenic acid reduces the risk for pneumonia. Details: Epidemiological research has found that increasing dietary alpha-linolenic acid consumption is associated with a reduced risk of community-acquired pneumonia (13760).
• Psoriasis. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for psoriasis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Respiratory tract infections. It is unclear if oral alpha-linolenic acid is beneficial for reducing the incidence of respiratory tract infections in children. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children aged 3-4 years shows that taking alpha-linolenic acid 855 mg, in combination with linoleic acid 596 mg daily from November through February in 2 consecutive years, might reduce the number of recurrent respiratory infections when compared with placebo (10785).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if oral alpha-linolenic acid is beneficial in patients with RA. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking an alpha-linolenic acid-rich oil (flaxseed oil) for 3 months does not improve symptoms or laboratory parameters of RA when compared with baseline or with a linoleic acid-rich oil (safflower oil) (5898).
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for SLE, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Ulcerative colitis. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for ulcerative colitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate alpha-linolenic acid for these uses.

(Read more about ALPHA-LINOLENIC ACID (ALA))

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Coronary heart disease (CHD). Supporting, but not conclusive, evidence suggests that consuming fats and oils rich in oleic acid might reduce the risk of CHD (26466,95745,98563,101821). However, the relationship between blood levels of oleic acid and risk of CHD or CVD is unclear (101832,101834,101838). In 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that it would allow a qualified health claim stating that replacing dietary fats and oils higher in saturated fat with oils containing at least 70% oleic acid may reduce the risk of CHD. To achieve this benefit, high-oleic acid containing oils should not increase total daily energy intake. The suggested daily dietary intake is about 20 grams (1.5 tablespoons) of high oleic acid oils in place of other fats and oils. These oils include olive oil, high-oleic acid sunflower oil, and high-oleic acid canola oil (98563). A meta-analysis of clinical studies shows that replacing 7.5% of energy from partially hydrogenated vegetable oils with high oleic acid sunflower oil can reduce coronary heart disease risk by about 9% to 19%. Furthermore, analysis of results from observational studies found that replacing partially hydrogenated oil with high oleic acid sunflower oil is associated with a 16% to 35% reduction in the risk of coronary heart disease events (95745). Clinical research in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk shows that taking high-oleic acid canola oil 60 grams per 3000 kcal of energy daily as part of a fixed composition diet for 4-6 weeks reduces the Framingham 10-year coronary heart disease risk scores by 6.8% compared to baseline (26466,101821). However, taking the high-oleic acid canola oil is no more effective than regular canola oil, which contains approximately 62% oleic acid (26466,101821). The relationship between blood levels of oleic acid and risk of CHD or CVD is unclear. While some population research has found that having the highest blood levels of oleic acid is associated with an increased risk of CVD when compared to having the lowest blood levels of oleic acid, other research suggests an inverse association or no association at all (101832,101834,101838). One study has found that having the highest blood levels of oleic acid is associated with a 1.4- to 2-fold increased risk of heart failure, other cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality (101832). In contrast, another found that the highest blood levels of oleic acid is associated with a 73% reduced risk of having a stroke (101838). A third study found no association at all between plasma levels of oleic acid and risk of heart failure (101834). The clinical significance of these findings is unclear, and results should not necessarily be extrapolated to dietary oleic acid (101832). While plasma oleic acid levels seem to be a weak indirect marker of moderate to high olive oil use, it is also a weak marker of intake of butter and avian fats (101838). Furthermore, there is no clear evidence that plasma levels of oleic acid directly correlate with dietary oleic acid, especially where dietary oleic acid intake is relatively low (101832). As a non-essential fatty acid, oleic acid is endogenously synthesized in the liver from saturated fats (101832,101834,101838).
• Hypercholesterolemia. Evidence from small studies shows that consuming oils rich in oleic acid as part of the diet in place of other dietary fats may improve cholesterol levels (21698,26466,67569,101821). Preliminary clinical research in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that consuming oleic acid as part of a high oleic sunflower oil- or high oleic canola oil-rich diet for 3-4 weeks decreases total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by a moderate amount when compared with diets rich in palm oil, medium-chain triglycerides, or a blend of fats found in a regular Western diet (21698,67569). Other clinical research in patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor shows that consuming oleic acid as part of high oleic acid canola oil for up to 4 weeks reduces total cholesterol by up to 9.4% and LDL cholesterol by up to 12.5% compared to baseline or a diet higher in saturated fats. However, taking the high oleic acid canola oil is no more effective than regular canola oil, also a source of oleic acid (26466,101821).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bladder cancer. Population research has found that the highest blood levels of oleic acid are associated with a 46% decreased risk of having bladder cancer when compared to the lowest blood levels (101844). However, plasma oleic acid levels are only a weak indirect marker of dietary intake of oleic acid. As a non-essential fatty acid, oleic acid is endogenously synthesized in the liver from saturated fats (101832,101834,101838). The effect of oleic acid supplementation on bladder cancer risk is unknown.
• Breast cancer. Population research has found no association between dietary fatty acid intake, including oleic acid, and the risk of breast cancer (96528). The effect of oleic acid supplementation on breast cancer risk is unknown.
• Depression. An observational study in perimenopausal patients aged 42-52 years has found that increasing dietary intake of oleic acid is associated with an increase in depression symptom scores. The odds ratio for depressive symptoms was approximately 2-fold higher for the highest quartile of oleic acid intake when compared with the lowest quartile (108924).
• Diabetes. A small clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking oleic acid as part of a low-fat diet containing 15% monounsaturated fatty acids for 3 weeks does not alter levels of total or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or the change in LDL oxidation when compared with taking linoleic acid as part of a low-fat diet containing 15% polyunsaturated fatty acids (101847).
• Diarrhea. Preliminary clinical research in patients with chronic diarrhea shows that taking oleic acid 1.6 or 3.2 mL before a meal reduces bowel movements over the next 24 hours by approximately 22% compared with taking no oleic acid. Intestinal transit time was also increased by 28 and 54 minutes, respectively (101848). Since the specific cause of chronic diarrhea differed among the patients included in this study, it is unclear if oleic acid is beneficial for most or only certain forms of chronic diarrhea.
• Hypertension. Preliminary clinical research in patients with central obesity and at least one other cardiovascular disease risk factor shows that taking oleic acid as high oleic acid canola oil for 4 weeks does not reduce systolic or diastolic blood pressure compared to baseline (26466).
• Obesity. Preliminary clinical research in patients with central obesity shows that taking oleic acid as high oleic acid canola oil for 4 weeks reduces abdominal fat mass by approximately 0.1 kg compared to baseline (98564). Other preliminary clinical research in patients with central adiposity and at least one other risk factor of cardiovascular disease shows that taking high oleic acid canola oil for 6 weeks reduces total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 3.4% and 5.6%, respectively, compared with a control oil lower in monounsaturated fats and higher in saturated fats (101821). However, in these studies, taking the high oleic acid canola oil is no more effective than regular canola oil, also a source of oleic acid (98564,101821). Any effect of oleic acid itself is unclear.
• Pancreatic cancer. The association between dietary oleic acid and pancreatic cancer risk is unclear. Most population research shows no association between dietary oleic acid and pancreatic cancer risk. However, one large population study has found that the highest intake of oleic acid, at least 23.7 grams daily, is associated with a 71% decreased risk of pancreatic cancer when compared with the lowest intake. The benefit is only observed in overweight or obese individuals. (101833). The effect of oleic acid supplementation on pancreatic cancer risk is unknown.
• Short bowel syndrome. A small preliminary clinical trial in patients with surgical short bowel syndrome of at least 2 years shows that taking oleic acid 3.2 mL in 50 mL of a beverage daily for 3 months does not reduce intestinal transit time or diarrhea, or improve body weight, when compared with placebo. In addition, energy absorption was reduced by 14% (101843).
• Stroke. Population research has found that highest blood levels of oleic acid are associated with a 73% reduced risk of stroke when compared with lowest blood levels of oleic acid (101838). However, plasma oleic acid levels are only a weak indirect marker of dietary oleic acid. As a non-essential fatty acid, oleic acid is endogenously synthesized in the liver from saturated fats (101832,101834,101838). The effect of oleic acid supplementation on stroke risk is unknown.
• Ulcerative colitis. Although some contradictory evidence exists, a large population study has found that, after adjusting for dietary intake of omega-3 fatty acids, highest dietary intake of oleic acid is associated with a 97% reduced odds of developing ulcerative colitis when compared with the lowest intake (101846). The effect of oleic acid supplementation on ulcerative colitis risk is unknown.

(Read more about OLEIC ACID)

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Most research suggests that increasing dietary intake of omega-6 fatty acids does not reduce the risk of CVD. Details: A meta-analysis including 19 low-quality randomized controlled trials that followed patients for 1-8 years shows that higher intake of omega-6 fatty acids for at least 12 months does not reduce the risk of primary or secondary CVD events, coronary heart disease (CHD) events, stroke, or all-cause or CVD mortality when compared with a lower intake. The intake of omega-6 fatty acids ranged from 0.8% to 20.6% of energy (99973). Population research conducted over about 7.3 years has also found that baseline red blood cell omega-6 fatty acid levels are not associated with CVD events, CHD events, ischemic strokes, CVD deaths, or all-cause mortality (99974), and red blood cell omega-6 fatty acid levels do not differ between people with or without coronary artery disease in patients hospitalized for coronary angiography (96918). However, some research suggests that individual omega-6 fatty acids may have differing effects in the body. One population study has found that increased levels of shorter chain omega-6 fatty acids in red blood cells, including linoleic acid, gamma linolenic acid, and dihomo-gamma linolenic acid, are associated with a reduced risk of CVD mortality. Higher levels of the longer chain omega-6 fatty acids adrenic acid and docosapentaenoic acid are associated with a moderately increased risk of overall mortality in these patients (96918). Higher quality studies are needed to confirm these findings.
• Child development. Most research suggests that supplementing infant formula with arachidonic acid, an omega-6 fatty acid, and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), an omega-3 fatty acid, does not improve infant or child development. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that inclusion of arachidonic acid in infant formula at levels of up to 0.84% of fatty acids, in addition to DHA, for 2-12 months does not improve visual or neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm or full-term infants up to 18 months of age (96919,96920). Also, giving infants DHA- and arachidonic acid-supplemented formula during infancy does not appear to improve neurodevelopment by the age of 6 years (92503).
• Hyperlipidemia. Increasing dietary intake of omega-6 fatty acids does not seem to lower plasma cholesterol or triglyceride levels. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that increasing intake of omega-6 fatty acids, specifically linoleic acid or gamma-linolenic acid, by replacing dietary saturated or monounsaturated fatty acids modestly reduces levels of total cholesterol. However, the clinical significance is unclear. Also, increasing intake of omega-6 fatty acids does not seem to affect levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or triglycerides (99973).
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Most research suggests that taking omega-6 fatty acids is not beneficial for MS. Details: A meta-analysis of the available literature shows that taking omega-6 fatty acids, mainly as linoleic acid, does not seem to prevent disease progression in relapsing-remitting MS patients or chronic progressive MS patients at 24 months (107318).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if increased dietary omega-6 fatty acid intake is beneficial for preventing age-related cognitive decline. Details: Population research has found that the highest blood levels of omega-6 fatty acids during middle age are associated with the best overall cognitive functioning 13 years later when compared with lower intakes (99979). In addition, the highest tertile of omega-6 fatty acid intake in older adults, at least 8.8 mg per kcal daily, is inversely associated with having low cognitive performance. However, the same pattern was observed for the highest tertile of omega-3 fatty acids, and the omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acid ratio in the diet had no overall association with cognitive performance (103308).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Oral omega-6 fatty acids have only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; their effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a combination of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids twice daily for 3-6 months does not improve symptoms of ADHD in most children when compared with placebo, although it may improve ADHD symptoms in a subgroup of children with ADHD inattentive subtype plus comorbid neurodevelopmental disorders (65864).
• Blepharitis. It is unclear if oral omega-6 fatty acids are beneficial for blepharitis. Details: One preliminary clinical study in patients with Meibomian gland dysfunction shows that taking a specific product (Medilar, Fidia Oftal Bausch & Lomb Pharmaceuticals), which contains the omega-6 fatty acids linoleic acid 28.5 mg and gamma-linolenic acid 15 mg, once daily for 180 days in combination with eyelid hygiene can improve cloudiness from eye secretions and gland obstruction when compared with baseline (66665). However, the lack of a control group limits the validity of these results. Population research involving postmenopausal adults has also found that moderate dietary intake of omega-6 fatty acids is associated with a reduced risk of developing Meibomian gland dysfunction. However, high intake was not associated with a reduced risk in these patients, and the protective effect of omega-6 fatty acids, if any, in the general population is unclear (99978). Higher quality research is needed to confirm these results.
• Cancer. It is unclear if increased dietary intake of omega-6 fatty acids is beneficial for cancer prevention. Details: In a meta-analysis of clinical research, increasing intake of dietary omega-6 fatty acids does not seem to reduce cancer risk or mortality. However, the included research is of low quality (107005). Also, a meta-analysis of population research has found that dietary intake of omega-6 fatty acids is not associated with cancer risk. However, high blood levels of omega-6 fatty acids were associated with an 8% reduced risk of cancer when compared to low blood levels, with breast cancer carrying the strongest association. Each 5% increase in blood levels of omega-6 fatty acids was associated with a 2% decreased cancer risk (107006). These results should be interpreted with caution, since factors other than omega-6 fatty acid intake, such as alcohol intake or overall diet, may affect blood levels of omega-6 fatty acids (100516).
• Developmental coordination disorder (DCD). Oral omega-6 fatty acids have only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; their effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a combination of omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids for 3 months can improve reading, spelling, and behavior, but not motor skills, when compared with placebo in children with DCD (13748).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if higher dietary or supplemental intake of omega-6 fatty acids is associated with a reduced risk of diabetes. Details: Population research has found that the highest blood levels of the omega-6 fatty acid linoleic acid are associated with a 43% reduced risk of developing diabetes over a period of 5-42 years when compared with the lowest blood levels. Blood levels of another omega-6 fatty acid, arachidonic acid, do not seem to be linked to diabetes risk (96914). These results should be interpreted with caution, since factors other than omega-6 fatty acid intake, such as alcohol intake or overall diet, may affect blood levels of omega-6 fatty acids (100516). In addition, a meta-analysis of low-quality clinical research does not support any benefit of omega-6 fatty acids in the prevention or treatment of type 2 diabetes (101504).
• Diarrhea. It is unclear if formula supplemented with arachidonic acid is beneficial for diarrhea prevention in infancy. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that infant formula supplemented with arachidonic acid 34 mg/100 kcal and docosahexaenoic (DHA) acid, an omega-3 fatty acid, 17 mg/100 kcal (Enfamil Premium 1 and Enfamil Premium 2, Mead Johnson Nutrition) can reduce the incidence of diarrhea in the first year of life when compared with non-supplemented infant formula (92505).
• Dry eye. It is unclear if dietary intake of omega-6 fatty acids is beneficial for dry eye prevention. Details: Population research has found that higher intake of dietary omega-6 fatty acids is not associated with a reduced risk of dry eye after menopause (99978).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if dietary intake of omega-6 fatty acids is beneficial for blood pressure reduction. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of omega-6 fatty acids, especially linoleic acid, is inversely associated with the odds of hypertension in non-diabetic individuals. However, in patients with diabetes, higher intake of omega-6 fatty acids is associated with an increased odds of hypertension (99975).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if dietary intake of omega-6 fatty acids is beneficial for NAFLD prevention. Details: Cross-sectional population research is mixed with respect to dietary intake of omega-6 fatty acids in patients with NAFLD when compared with healthy controls. One large cross-sectional study based on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2007-2014 has found that consuming omega-6 fatty acids at a dose of at least 250 mg/kg daily is associated with an 82% reduced risk of having NAFLD when compared with consuming less than 121.3 mg/kg daily (107002).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral omega-6 fatty acids are beneficial for reducing cholesterol or triglyceride levels in adults with obesity. Details: In individuals with abdominal obesity, a small clinical trial shows that taking linoleic acid 15 grams (females) or 20 grams (males) (Pharmatech AS) daily for 7 weeks from safflower oil has modest beneficial effects on levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-, and total cholesterol when compared with baseline or taking fish oil. However, there was no effect on triglyceride levels (107003).
• Photoreactive keratectomy. Oral omega-6 fatty acids have only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; their effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients who have undergone photoreactive keratectomy shows that taking a tablet containing the omega-6 fatty acids linoleic acid and gamma-linolenic acid, as well as beta-carotene, B vitamins, and trace minerals, daily for 30 days can improve tear production and eye healing when compared with a control group (66679).
• Respiratory tract infections. It is unclear if supplementing infant formula with arachidonic acid is beneficial for preventing respiratory tract infections. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that infant formula supplemented with arachidonic acid 34 mg/100 kcal and docosahexaenoic acid (an omega-3 fatty acid) 17 mg/100 kcal (Enfamil Premium 1 and Enfamil Premium 2, Mead Johnson Nutrition) can reduce the incidence of respiratory illness in the first year of life when compared with non-supplemented infant formula (92505). More evidence is needed to rate omega-6 fatty acids for these uses.

(Read more about OMEGA-6 FATTY ACIDS)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts typically found in foods (7141,7142,7144). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of alpha-linolenic acid when used in larger, medicinal amounts.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts typically found in foods (7141,7142,7145). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of alpha-linolenic acid during pregnancy and lactation when used in larger, medicinal amounts; avoid using.

(Read more about ALPHA-LINOLENIC ACID (ALA))

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in food amounts. Edible oils containing high amounts of oleic acid are commonly used in foods (26466,90681,94452,101821,101824,101828,101830,101838). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of oleic acid when used as medicine.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using in amounts greater than those commonly found in foods.

(Read more about OLEIC ACID)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts found in foods. Dietary intake in amounts of 5% to 10% of daily calories are appropriate according to the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range (AMDR) (23723). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of omega-6 fatty acids when used orally in medicinal amounts.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when consumed by children over the age of 12 months as part of the diet in amounts between 5% to 10% of daily calories according to the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range (AMDR) (23723).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when consumed as part of the diet in amounts between 5% and 10% of daily calories according to the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range (AMDR) (23723).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when high amounts of omega-6 fatty acids are consumed in the diet. Population research suggests that the highest maternal intakes of omega-6 fatty acids (15.2-47.6 grams or 137-428 kcal daily) during pregnancy is associated with a 2.4-times greater odds of giving birth to an infant below the 10th percentile for birth weight when compared with the lowest maternal intakes (0.4-5.7 grams daily) (96913). In addition, population research in women with a history of atopy suggests that the highest blood levels of omega-6 fatty acids during the second trimester is associated with an increased odds of having a child develop atopic dermatitis by age 4-6 years when compared with the lowest intakes (103309). There is insufficient reliable information available about supplemental omega-6 fatty acids; avoid using.

(Read more about OMEGA-6 FATTY ACIDS)

(Read more about ALPHA-LINOLENIC ACID (ALA))

(Read more about OLEIC ACID)

(Read more about OMEGA-6 FATTY ACIDS)

General ...Orally, alpha-linolenic acid from dietary sources is well tolerated when used in the diet as a replacement for other sources of fat, such as saturated fats.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is some concern that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid might increase the risk for prostate cancer, although research is conflicting.

Oncologic ...Epidemiologic research suggests that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid might increase risk for prostate cancer (1337,2558,7823,7147,12978). Other research suggests high intake or serum levels of alpha-linolenic acid does not increase the overall risk of prostate cancer (12961,15736); however, it might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer (12961). Association with prostate cancer appears to depend on the sources of alpha-linolenic acid. Dairy and meat sources has been positively associated with prostate cancer, whereas plant sources, such as flaxseed, don't seem to affect prostate cancer risk (12909). According to a clinical trial, intake of alpha-linolenic acid does not appear to increase levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) (91402). Also, longer-chain omega-3 fatty acids in fish oils are associated with a decreased risk of total and advanced prostate cancer (12961).

Other ...Alpha-linolenic acid is a type of fat, containing 9 kilocalories/gram, and may result in weight gain if consumed in excess. Patients should be advised that it's best to substitute alpha-linolenic acid in the diet for other sources of fat, such as saturated fats.

(Read more about ALPHA-LINOLENIC ACID (ALA))

General ...Orally, oleic acid generally well tolerated when used as part of oils and fats in the diet (26466,90681,94452,101821,101824,101828,101830,101838). Temporary burning in the mouth or throat has occurred in some patients (101848).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, oleic acid has caused temporary burning in the mouth or throat in some patients in one clinical study (101848).

(Read more about OLEIC ACID)

General ...Orally, consuming omega-6 fatty acids in amounts found in foods is well tolerated.

Cardiovascular ...Dietary intake of the omega-6 fatty acid linoleic acid in amounts of 5% to 10% of daily calories is appropriate according to the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range (AMDR) (23723). However, higher intake levels, especially when compared with omega-3 fatty acid intake, might be detrimental. For example, a higher ratio of dietary omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids is thought to increase the risk of cardiovascular disease compared to a lower ratio (66678). However, the American Heart Association Nutrition Subcommittee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism, the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, suggest that reduction of omega-6 fatty acids in the diet is unlikely to be beneficial for the cardiovascular system if replaced with saturated or trans-fatty acids (66692). Population research has found that higher intake of omega-6 fatty acids might be associated with hypertension and increased levels of plasma homocysteine, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis (65498,66640,66642).

Musculoskeletal ...In epidemiological research, increased intake of omega-6 fatty acids was associated with elevated risk of fracture in the elderly (66662).

Neurologic/CNS ...In epidemiological research, an increased dietary ratio of omega-6 fatty acids to omega-3 fatty acids has been associated with an elevated risk of having a sleep disorder (107001).

Oncologic ...Some population research has found that high omega-6 fatty acid intake or blood levels are associated with an increased risk for cancer, including breast cancer and prostate cancer (3508,7824,66660,66664,66729).

Psychiatric ...In epidemiological research, adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) had higher levels of omega-6 and lower levels of omega-3 fatty acids in red blood cells (48200). The role of omega-6 fatty acids in ADHD is unclear; it is possible that the low levels of omega-3 fatty acids and essential fatty acids in general may be playing a role. Also, higher levels of some omega-6 fatty acids in the body are associated with greater depressive symptomology and neuroticism (65815,66659). Higher concentrations of some omega-6 fatty acids in red blood cells of patients with schizophrenia are correlated with positive schizotypal trait measures in healthy adults (66635). This may be related to increased intake of omega-6 fatty acids in the diet of patients with schizophrenia (96916).

(Read more about OMEGA-6 FATTY ACIDS)