Propolis 300 by Yamada Bee Company

EFFECTIVE

• Bowel preparation. Oral sodium phosphate is effective for cleansing the colon in preparation for colonoscopy; however, it is unclear whether sodium phosphate is as effective as polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution. Some products are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this use. However, due to the potential for kidney damage, sodium phosphate is not recommended as first-line therapy. Details: Sodium phosphate tablets (OsmoPrep, Salix Pharmaceuticals; Visicol, Salix Pharmaceuticals) are FDA-approved for cleansing the colon in preparation for colonoscopy. Clinical research shows that using the OsmoPrep formulation can achieve an "excellent" or "good" response rate, which is defined as having 90% of the mucosa visible with only some or little suctioning needed, in 94% to 97% of patients (88133). Similarly, using the specific product Visicol has been shown to achieve an excellent or good response rate in 82% to 86% of patients (94674). Non-FDA-approved sodium phosphate products have also been investigated. One such product (Fleet Phospho-soda, C. B. Fleet Co.) has been shown to achieve adequate bowel cleansing in 23% to 89% of patients (93846,94673). Another sodium phosphate tablet preparation (Clicolon tablets, Korea Pharma Co.) has been shown to achieve adequate bowel cleansing in 63% to 93% of patients (93848,93850,93853). Excellent or good bowel cleansing was found in 98.6% of patients using a 32-tablet regimen of other sodium phosphate tablets (Quiklean, Universal Integrated Corporation) (107008). Reasons for the differences in the percentage of patients who achieve adequate bowel cleansing with the same sodium phosphate product may relate to the method used to analyze bowel cleansing, differences in diet followed during bowel cleansing, and demographic factors (93846,93848,93850,93853). Various preparations (OsmoPrep, Salix Pharmaceuticals; Visicol, Salix Pharmaceuticals; Clicolon tablets, Korea Pharma Co.; Quiklean, Universal Integrated Corporation) have been used which contain 1.102 grams of sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate and 0.398 grams of sodium phosphate dibasic anhydrous. These products have been taken as 3-4 tablets with 8 ounces of water every 15 minutes for a total of 20 tablets the evening before colonoscopy, and 3-4 tablets with 8 ounces of water every 15 minutes for a total of 12-20 tablets the morning of a colonoscopy (88133,93848,93850,94674,107008). Also, sodium phosphate solution (Fleet Phospho-soda, C. B. Fleet Co.) containing sodium hydrogen phosphate 24.4 grams and disodium phosphate dodecahydrate 10.8 grams has also been used the morning and evening before the procedure (93846). Numerous publications have compared the bowel cleansing activity of sodium phosphate with PEG solution. When given as a split-overnight dosage, sodium phosphate is about as effective as PEG solutions in achieving adequate bowel cleansing. However, when day-before dosage is used, PEG is more effective for bowel cleansing than sodium phosphate (93861,93862,107008). Sodium phosphate and PEG may have different effectiveness depending on the colonic site assessed. When only trials assessing descending colon cleansing are considered, sodium phosphate is found to work similarly to PEG solutions. When only studies assessing ascending colon cleansing are considered, PEG is more effective for bowel cleansing than sodium phosphate (93861). Also, a large clinical trial in outpatients scheduled for non-sedated colonoscopy shows that receiving PEG resulted in an easier insertion and a less painful colonoscopy when compared with receiving sodium phosphate (104473). However, in patients with chronic constipation, sodium phosphate seems to be preferable. A meta-analysis of three small clinical studies in adults with chronic constipation shows that using sodium phosphate has an 87% greater chance of a successful bowel preparation when compared with using PEG (104472). Sodium phosphate is not recommended as first-line therapy for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy due to the potential for kidney damage (93863,94672). In fact, one sodium phosphate preparation (Fleet Phospho-soda, C. B. Fleet Co.) that was previously approved as an over-the-counter supplement for bowel preparation in the US was withdrawn from the market for this indication in December 2008 due to concerns for phosphate-induced kidney disease (94672). Of the sodium phosphate products that are still approved by the FDA, current guidelines recommend that these products not be used for bowel cleansing in patients with kidney disease, pre-existing electrolyte disturbances, congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, ascites, or inflammatory bowel disease. Guidelines also recommend that caution should be used if these products are prescribed for patients who are elderly, hypertensive, or taking certain classes of drugs (94672). For small bowel preparation for endoscopy, a meta-analysis suggests that sodium phosphate is no more effective than fasting alone (93860).
• Hypophosphatemia. Oral or intravenous phosphate salts are effective for the prevention or treatment of hypophosphatemia. Some products are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this use. Details: Taking sodium or potassium phosphate orally is effective for preventing and treating hypophosphatemia (15). Treating hypophosphatemia with oral phosphates requires monitoring of serum electrolyte levels to determine appropriate dosing (15). The FDA-approved intravenous (IV) product is also used for the correction of hypophosphatemia (8302,8303,88135). FDA-approved intravenous (IV) sodium phosphate or potassium phosphate 15-30 mmol is typically given over 2-12 hours. Higher doses have been used if needed to increase efficacy (8302,8303,88135).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Constipation. Oral or rectal sodium phosphate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an ingredient in over-the-counter (OTC) products to treat constipation. Details: Sodium phosphate is an FDA-permitted ingredient of oral and rectal OTC products intended for the treatment of constipation (88107).
• Dyspepsia. Oral aluminum phosphate and calcium phosphate are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as ingredients in over-the-counter (OTC) antacids. Details: Aluminum phosphate and calcium phosphate are FDA-permitted ingredients of oral OTC products intended for use as antacids (88107).
• Hypercalcemia. Although other treatments are preferred, oral non-calcium phosphate salts are beneficial for treatment of mild to moderate hypercalcemia. Details: Taking phosphate salts (except calcium phosphate) orally is effective for treating mild to moderate hypercalcemia (88144,88145). Treating hypercalcemia with oral phosphates requires monitoring of serum electrolyte levels to determine appropriate dosing (15); other agents are now preferred (6479). Intravenous phosphates should be avoided due to the risk of calcium precipitation in vital organs (metastatic calcification) (15,88144,88145).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Oral potassium phosphate seems to be beneficial for prevention of kidney stones in individuals with hypercalciuria. Details: Taking potassium phosphate orally may help prevent calcium oxalate kidney stones in patients with hypercalciuria (6470). Clinical research in adults with absorptive hypercalciuria and at high risk for stone formation shows that taking a specific slow-release potassium phosphate product (Uro-Phos-K, Mission Pharmacal), providing phosphate 620 mg orally twice daily for 4 days, reduces urinary calcium excretion by 35% to 40% (2208,2209). Potassium and sodium phosphate salts providing 1200-1500 mg of elemental phosphate daily have been used (2209,6470).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Athletic performance. The evidence is mixed as to whether oral sodium phosphate improves cycling or running performance. Most research suggests that oral calcium phosphate and potassium phosphate are not beneficial. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium phosphate or potassium phosphate orally does not improve running or cycling performance (2499,9300,8301). Evidence for the use of sodium phosphate to improve cycling performance is mixed. One very small clinical study shows that taking sodium phosphate as tribasic sodium phosphate dodecahydrate for 6 days before a 10-mile cycling trial increases mean power output by about 10% and decreases the time needed to complete the trial by 3% in trained male cyclists (88150). Other small clinical trials in trained cyclists show that taking the same form of sodium phosphate as 50 mg/kg of fat-free mass in four divided doses daily for 6 days modestly improves work, power output, and peak oxygen uptake and reduces heart rate during high-intensity cycling exercise when compared to baseline (93857,93858,93859,107007). However, conflicting research shows that taking a similar dosage of this form of sodium phosphate does not improve time trial performance, work accomplished relative to energy expenditure, power output, or oxygen uptake in trained cyclists (93855,93856,107007). Sodium phosphate has also been evaluated for improving running performance, with mixed findings. Two small clinical trials in female athletes show that tribasic sodium phosphate dodecahydrate 50 mg/kg of fat-free mass taken in four divided doses daily for 6 days moderately improves repeated sprint times when compared with placebo (93843,93844). However, taking the same dosage does not significantly improve sprint times in male athletes (93849). Also, sodium phosphate does not seem to improve endurance or aerobic capacity in treadmill tests (8301,93854). Reasons for the discrepancies regarding the effects of sodium phosphate on athletic performance are not entirely clear, but likely relate to the very small number of participants in the included trials.
• Diabetic ketoacidosis. Potassium phosphate infusion is not recommended as first-line therapy for adults with diabetic ketoacidosis. Details: Clinical research shows that intravenous infusion of potassium phosphate 8.5 mmol/hour (approximately 6 grams of phosphate over 24 hours) along with potassium chloride 12.5 mEq/hour provides no benefit over potassium chloride alone in adults with diabetic ketoacidosis (88149). Guidelines for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis in the both the US and UK do not recommend phosphate replacement for most patients. However, it may be considered in specific cases, such as cardiac dysfunction, anemia, respiratory depression, and serum phosphate concentrations below 1 mg/dL (107349,107350A).
• Osteoporosis. Calcium phosphate seems to be beneficial for bone density improvement; however, it does not seem to be more beneficial than calcium carbonate. Details: In postmenopausal adults with osteoporosis and low phosphate intakes, taking calcium 1800 mg daily as tricalcium phosphate for 12 months improves lumbar spine and hip densities. However, it is no more effective than taking the same amount of calcium as calcium carbonate (93847). The calcium products were used in combination subcutaneous teriparatide and oral vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 1000 IU daily.
• Refeeding syndrome. It is unclear if intravenous potassium phosphate or sodium phosphate is beneficial for prevention of refeeding syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that giving intravenous sodium and potassium phosphates, 50 mmol (1.56 grams) phosphate over 24 hours, prevents the refeeding syndrome seen when restarting adequate nutrition after severe malnutrition or starvation when compared with historical controls (88148). More evidence is needed to rate phosphate salts for these uses.

(Read more about PHOSPHATE SALTS)

EFFECTIVE

• Hypokalemia. Oral or intravenous potassium can treat and prevent hypokalemia. Details: Administering potassium orally or intravenously is effective for treating and preventing hypokalemia (15,107970). Oral potassium 20 mEq (780 mg of elemental potassium) is typically taken once daily to prevent hypokalemia (15,95010). Oral potassium 40-100 mEq (1560-3900 mg of elemental potassium) is typically taken in 2-5 divided doses daily to treat hypokalemia (95010). Doses should be limited to 40 mEq (1560 mg of elemental potassium), and the total dose should not exceed 200 mEq (7800 mg of elemental potassium) in 24 hours (95010). Potassium supplementation and route of administration should be individualized based on serum potassium level and patient status (15,107970).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Hypertension. Oral potassium, via dietary intake or supplementation, reduces blood pressure. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary potassium consumption is associated with a lower risk of developing hypertension (1310,8817,69512). Additionally, most clinical research shows that potassium, taken orally as part of the diet or as a supplement, reduces systolic blood pressure by about 3-9.5 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by about 2-6.4 mmHg in patients with or without hypertension (3385,92104,92106,95624,107974). In most of these studies, daily intake of potassium typically ranged from about 1500-7800 mg, with the most common intake being about 2340-2540 mg daily (92104,95624). However, some research shows that taking potassium does not lower systolic or diastolic blood pressure (69541,69550,107966). Differences in the patient populations, potassium intake, and salt intake could have contributed to the conflicting results. Potassium seems to be more effective for people with hypertension, low potassium levels, high daily sodium intake, and for Black adults (3384,3385,3386,92104,92106). Some research also shows that the greatest blood pressure-lowering effects of potassium occur at doses of about 3900-7800 mg daily (95624). A meta-analysis of clinical trials using a novel computational technique to assess both potassium intake and excretion suggests that the optimal blood pressure reduction occurs when taking about 1500 mg supplemental potassium daily or an overall intake of 4500-6500 mg potassium daily (105448). This analysis is limited by the heterogeneity and short duration of the included trials. There is also interest in utilizing low-sodium, high-potassium food substitutes to treat hypertension. Research shows that using salt substitutes containing 25% to 30% potassium chloride reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 3-4.6 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, when compared with regular table salt (107971,107976). In 2017, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) published guidelines recommending that patients with hypertension consume 3500-5000 mg of potassium daily (95680). This intake of potassium is expected to lower systolic blood pressure by about 4-5 mmHg in patients with hypertension and by about 2 mmHg in normotensive patients (3385). Although potassium supplements and dietary potassium both seem to be beneficial, the guidelines recommend getting potassium from dietary sources, since potassium-rich diets are usually heart-healthy (95680). Additionally, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Oral prescription potassium citrate reduces the risk of kidney stone recurrence. It is unclear if non-prescription potassium citrate would be beneficial. Details: The American Urological Association (AUA) recommends potassium citrate therapy for patients with recurrent calcium stones and low urinary citrate, those with recurrent calcium or calcium oxalate stones without current metabolic abnormalities, and those with uric acid or cystine stones. The citrate component reduces urine calcium excretion and increases urine citrate and urine pH, which in turn alleviates crystal growth, formation, and aggregation. Sodium citrate may also be used to prevent stone recurrence; however, due to sodium's propensity to increase urine calcium excretion, potassium citrate remains the preferred salt formulation (107972). It is important to note that potassium citrate supplements are not equivalent to prescription potassium citrate products. Dose and duration of treatment is determined by a healthcare professional and individualized based on a patient's urinary citrate levels (107975,107989). Serum potassium levels should be monitored prior to starting potassium citrate, within 2 weeks of treatment initiation, and every 12 months (107975).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Eating foods high in potassium and low in sodium might reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. It is unclear if taking potassium supplements has the same benefit. Details: Large population studies in adults without prior CVD have found that higher dietary potassium intake is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events (109395,109399). One study found that daily potassium intake of about 3300 mg is associated with a 13% reduction in CVD risk when compared with intake of about 1920 mg (109399). The other study found that each additional 1000 mg of daily urinary potassium excretion, which is a marker of dietary intake, is associated with an 18% reduction in CVD risk (109395). Another observational study in over 15,000 adults with history of stroke or hypertension shows that replacing regular table salt with a substitute product containing 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride for an average of 5 years decreases the rate of stroke, major cardiovascular events, or death (107976). High quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this association. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).
• Stroke. Eating foods high in potassium and low in sodium might reduce the risk of stroke. It is unclear if taking potassium supplements has the same benefit. Details: Higher dietary intake of potassium seems to be associated with a lower risk of stroke. Population research has found that increasing dietary potassium intake by 1-1.5 grams daily is associated with up to a 20% reduced risk of stroke (92105,92107). Some population research has found that higher supplemental intake of potassium is associated with a 29% reduced risk of ischemic stroke. However, supplemental potassium intake is not found to be associated with a lower risk of hemorrhagic or total stroke (92107). An observational study in over 15,000 adults with history of stroke or hypertension shows that replacing regular table salt with a substitute product containing 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride for an average of 5 years decreases the rate of stroke, major cardiovascular events, or death (107976). High quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this association. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Dental hypersensitivity. It is unclear if topical potassium improves dental hypersensitivity. Details: One meta-analysis of clinical research shows that using a dentifrice containing 5% potassium nitrite reduces dentin sensitivity when compared with a dentifrice that does not contain potassium nitrite (69549). Other clinical research published in a systematic review shows that potassium-containing toothpastes might reduce dentin sensitivity more than controls that do not contain potassium. However, these toothpastes might be less effective than other active toothpastes, such as those containing sodium monofluorophosphate, and the effect may result from a placebo effect, since the mechanism of action of potassium is unclear (69456).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if increasing dietary potassium reduces the risk of diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of 7 large population studies has found that consuming dietary potassium 3300-3500 mg daily is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of diabetes when compared with consumption below 1000 mg daily. Results were similar when studies that measured potassium intake with a dietary questionnaire were analyzed separately from those that measured intake based on urinary potassium excretion (110776). However, the validity of this finding is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies. Furthermore, despite use of data from various databases, most studies included in the analysis were conducted by the same author.
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral potassium improves glycemic control in prediabetes. Details: A small clinical study in Black patients with prediabetes shows that taking extended-release potassium (Klor-Con M10, Cardinal Health) 40 mEq daily as potassium chloride for 3 months does not improve glucose tolerance when compared with placebo. Although fasting glucose levels were slightly reduced in the potassium group when compared with placebo, both groups experienced a worsening of glucose intolerance, with no change in insulin levels or glycated hemoglobin (98533).
• Osteoporosis. Although there is interest in using oral potassium for osteoporosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of potassium for this condition.
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral potassium improves physical performance in older adults. Details: Observational research in older adults has found that decreased dietary potassium intake and increased dietary sodium intake over 5 years is associated with worsened physical performance (105450).
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral potassium is beneficial in patients with SLE. Details: Observational research in patients with SLE has found that increased dietary potassium intake is not associated with improvements in disease activity scores or markers of cardiovascular disease, including lipid levels and blood pressure, when compared with low dietary potassium intake. However, higher potassium intake does seem to reduce the odds of having elevated levels of C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation, in these patients (109397). More evidence is needed to rate potassium for these uses.

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Diabetes. Oral propolis seems to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes; however, some conflicting evidence exists. Details: A meta-analysis of six clinical trials including 374 patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking propolis for 8 weeks to 6 months reduces glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.5% and fasting plasma glucose by 14 mg/dL when compared with placebo. However, significant improvements in insulin levels or measures of insulin resistance were lacking (102520). While this pooled analysis suggests that propolis is modestly effective for improving glycemic control, individual study results are mixed. Three of the trials in the analysis failed to demonstrate significant improvements in HbA1c or glucose levels; however, all of these studies were small and likely underpowered to detect meaningful improvements in glycemic control (102523,102524,102525). Other studies showed positive results, with reductions in HbA1c ranging from 0.9% to 1.1% and reductions in fasting plasma glucose ranging from 21 mg/dL to 26 mg/dL. The doses and durations of propolis therapy in these studies included 400 mg daily for 6 months (99173), 900 mg daily for 12 weeks (95883), and 500 mg three times daily for 8 weeks (102521).
• Herpes labialis (cold sores). Topical propolis ointment or cream, applied five times daily, may improve lesion healing and reduce symptoms in patients with cold sores. Details: One small clinical study in patients with cold sores shows that applying a specific propolis 3% ointment (Herstat or ColdSore-FX by Afexa), five times daily at the start of symptoms, reduces cold sore duration by about 3-4 days and may reduce cold sore-related pain when compared with placebo (17664,17665). Larger clinical studies in patients with cold sores in the papular or vesicular stages show that applying a lip cream containing a specific propolis extract (GH2002) 0.5% five times daily for 5-10 days reduces the time to complete encrustation/epithelialization by about 1 day and improves symptoms of pain, burning, itching, tension, and swelling when compared with acyclovir 5% cream (95875,102519).
• Oral mucositis. Most clinical research shows that oral propolis or propolis-containing mouthwash can reduce the risk for severe, chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Details: A meta-analysis of five clinical trials including 209 patients shows that using mouthwash containing propolis reduces the odds of severe chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis by 65% when compared with placebo in cancer patients (99171). Rinsing with 5-10 mL of a propolis mouth rinse for 1 minute three times daily, alone or in addition to chlorhexidine mouthwash and fluconazole for 7-14 days, improves mucositis and redness when compared to control in patients receiving chemotherapy (92793,95877). A small clinical study in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer also shows that taking tablets of propolis (Natur Farma S.A.S.) 80 mg two or three times daily for 3 weeks, in addition to rinsing with sodium bicarbonate solution, decreases the development of mucositis when compared with only rinsing with sodium bicarbonate solution (95882). However, at least one high quality clinical study shows that rinsing with 7 mL of a specific product (Faringel, Cadigroup) containing propolis extract 6% and other ingredients three times daily for 6 weeks does not prevent the development of mucositis due to chemotherapy when compared with placebo in patients with head and neck cancer (95879).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial for improving athletic performance. Details: A small clinical study in healthy male military cadets shows that taking propolis 450 mg twice daily for 4 weeks does not improve measures of aerobic or anaerobic performance during exercise testing when compared with placebo (108519).
• Atopic disease. It is unclear if oral propolis can prevent atopic disease in lactating adults or their infants. Details: A small clinical study in lactating adults shows that taking propolis 300 mg daily for 4-10 months does not appear to reduce the risk for developing atopic disease in either the mothers or their infants when compared with placebo (102518). However, due to the small sample size, this study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with breast cancer. Details: A small clinical study in patients with stage II or III breast cancer receiving chemotherapy shows that taking propolis 250 mg twice daily for 3 months improves quality of life and nutritional status when compared with placebo (108518). It is unknown if propolis can increase the likelihood of survival or remission in patients with breast cancer.
• Burns. It is unclear if topical propolis is beneficial in patients with minor burns. Details: One small clinical study in patients with minor burns shows that application of propolis cream to burn wounds every 3 days improves healing and reduces inflammation when compared with silver sulfadiazine. Propolis cream seems to be as effective for preventing infection as silver sulfadiazine in these patients (8663).
• Canker sores. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with canker sores. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with recurrent canker sores shows that taking propolis 500 mg daily for 6-13 months significantly reduces canker sore outbreaks and improves quality of life when compared with placebo. A 50% or greater reduction in cold sore outbreaks was reported in 60% and 11% of patients taking propolis or placebo, respectively (17629).
• Catheter-related infections. It is unclear if topical propolis is beneficial for the prevention of catheter-related infections. Details: One small clinical study in patients with peritoneal dialysis catheters shows that cleaning the exit site after dialysis with a normal saline wash and propolis 10% ointment for 6 months does not reduce the rate of catheter site infections when compared with using normal saline wash plus mupirocin 2% ointment or normal saline wash alone (109985).
• Chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with CKD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with CKD shows that taking Brazilian green propolis extract (EPP-AF) 250 mg twice daily for 12 months reduces proteinuria, but does not increase estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), when compared with placebo (105785).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Oral propolis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with frequent exacerbations of COPD shows that taking a combination of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) 1200 mg and propolis 160 mg orally once daily for 3 months reduces the incidence of acute exacerbations during 1 year of follow-up when compared with placebo or a lower dose combination of NAC 600mg and propolis 80 mg (109984). Further research shows that using the higher dose combination for 6 months reduces acute exacerbations, cough, and overall COPD severity, and increases dyspnea-free walking distance, when compared with placebo or the lower dose combination (109986).
• Common cold. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with the common cold. Details: One small clinical study in patients with rhinovirus infection shows that taking propolis (dose and duration unknown) might decrease the duration of cold symptoms 2.5-fold when compared with placebo (6602).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19. Details: A small observational study in healthcare professionals working in an emergency department shows that taking a 30% Anatolian propolis solution as 20 drops twice daily for one month reduces the occurrence of COVID-19 positivity to 2 of 102 subjects, compared with 14 of 102 in an untreated control group (109983). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of blinding and randomization. A small, open-label clinical study in hospitalized adults with COVID-19 shows that taking a standardized green propolis extract (EPP-AF) 100 mg or 200 mg four times daily for 7 days, along with conventional therapy, reduces length of hospital stay by around 5-6 days, but does not affect the need for supplemental oxygen, odds of intubation, or admission to the intensive care unit, when compared with conventional therapy alone (108514).
• Dengue fever. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with dengue fever. Details: A small clinical study in patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever shows that taking propolis extract (Propoelix) 400 mg three times daily for 7 days reduces the length of hospital stay by about 18 hours when compared with placebo. This was based on being deemed technically fit for discharge because of a recovery of platelet counts. The effect of propolis on other symptoms of dengue fever was not investigated in this study (99168).
• Dental caries. It is unclear if topical propolis, used either as a chewing gum or mouthwash, can prevent dental caries in children. Details: One small clinical trial in children 6-8 years of age at high risk of dental caries shows that chewing propolis gum twice daily for 20 minutes or rinsing with 10 mL of propolis 2% mouthwash for 1 minute twice daily for 2 weeks reduces plaque and Streptococcus mutans count when compared to baseline. There were no differences between the two propolis formulations; however, children preferred the chewing gum over the mouthwash (105790). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of control group.
• Denture stomatitis. Small clinical studies suggest that topical propolis may speed recovery in patients with denture stomatitis. Details: One very small clinical study in denture-bearing patients with prosthesis stomatitis candidiasis shows that applying Brazilian green propolis 20% ethanol extract topically four times daily for 7 days can cause regression of candidiasis lesions. After 7 days, 58% of patients treated with propolis and 67% of patients treated with nystatin had total lesion remission. After 15 days, all patients in both groups saw total lesion remission (70070). Also, two small clinical studies in patients with denture-induced oral mucositis show that applying propolis 2% to 3% gel (EPP-AF) to dentures three to four times daily for 7-14 days improves the cure rate and reduces erythema. In these studies, propolis appeared to be comparable to applying miconazole to dentures (95881,95884).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial as adjunct therapy in patients with depression. Details: A small clinical study in patients with moderate to severe depression inadequately managed with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) shows that taking propolis 1000 mg daily for 6 weeks, in addition to SSRI therapy, reduces symptoms of depression, as measured on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), when compared with placebo (108523).
• Diabetic foot ulcers. It is unclear if topical propolis is beneficial in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Details: A small clinical study in patients with diabetic foot ulcers shows that topical application of propolis 5% ointment in addition to routine care for 4 weeks reduces ulcer size about 2.5-fold more than routine care alone (99172).
• Genital herpes. It is unclear if topical propolis is beneficial in patients with genital herpes. Details: A small clinical study in patients with recurrent genital herpes caused by herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) shows that applying propolis 3% ointment (Herstat or ColdSore-FX by Afexa) four times daily for 10 days reduces healing time and increases the relative rate of complete healing by 1.7- and 2-fold when compared with acyclovir 5% ointment and placebo, respectively (1926).
• Gingivitis. Small clinical studies suggest that topical propolis may modestly improve symptoms in patients with gingivitis. Details: A small clinical study shows that rinsing with a propolis 2% solution 20 mL twice daily for 21 days is as effective as a rinse containing sodium fluoride 0.05% plus cetylpyridinium chloride 0.05% for the prevention of induced gingival redness and bleeding (99169). Another small clinical study in patients with gingivitis shows that rinsing with a propolis solution twice daily for 4 weeks reduces gingival bleeding, but does not improve plaque index, when compared with placebo (108513). Propolis has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. One small clinical study in patients with plaque-induced gingivitis shows that adjuvant therapy with a topical gel containing propolis and other ingredients (Oralsan NBF gel, IDS SpA) for 15 days following scaling and root planing is as effective as a chlorhexidine-based gel for improving bleeding, plaque, and probing depth (99170). Another small clinical study in patients with generalized or localized gingivitis or stage I periodontitis shows that taking 194 mg of a product containing propolis and mangosteen improves the modified gingival index by 31% or 40% at weeks 4 or 8, respectively, compared with 16% or 25% in those receiving placebo. No changes in probing depth, clinical attachment, plaque index, bleeding, or gingival recession were observed (106789).
• Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with H. pylori infection. Details: One very small, uncontrolled clinical study in patients with H. pylori infection shows that taking 60 drops of an alcoholic preparation of Brazilian green propolis daily for 7 days does not reduce H. pylori infection when compared to baseline (70107).
• HIV/AIDS. Although there has been interest in using oral propolis as an adjunct to antiretroviral therapy for HIV/AIDS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of propolis for this purpose.
• Intestinal parasite infection. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with giardiasis. Details: One small clinical study in adults with giardia infection shows that taking a specific propolis 30% extract (Propolisina, Apis Flora) for 5 days increases cure rates when compared with tinidazole. The cure rate was 60% with propolis extract, compared to only 40% with tinidazole. In children with giardiasis, taking propolis 10% extract showed a 52% cure rate; however, the rate of cure with tinidazole was not available (70121).
• Malnutrition. It is unclear if oral red propolis is beneficial in malnourished children with frequent respiratory tract infections. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 1-5 years with frequent respiratory tract infections and growth failure associated with malnutrition shows that giving 3% red propolis in 8 mL (10 grams) of honey once daily in addition to adequate nutrition does not improve weight gain or reduce the frequency of respiratory infections when compared with honey plus adequate nutrition (109987).
• Muscle fatigue. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial for speeding recovery from muscle fatigue. Details: One small study in young, healthy males shows that taking Brazilian green propolis 1575 mg before meals three times daily for one week, followed by exercise to induce muscle fatigue, reduces the time to regain maximal contraction torque after stopping when compared with placebo or a 100-mg dose of propolis. There was no difference in average peak power between the groups (109989).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with NAFLD. Details: One small clinical study in patients with NAFLD shows that taking propolis extract 250 mg twice daily for 4 months improves markers of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, but does not improve liver function, when compared with placebo (105786). Another small study in adults with obesity and NAFLD shows that taking propolis 510 mg daily for 8 weeks with a calorie-restricted diet reduces liver fibrosis, fasting blood glucose levels, serum insulin levels, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) when compared with placebo. However, it does not affect the severity of fatty liver, anthropometric measurements, lipid profile, or levels of inflammatory markers (109988).
• Peptic ulcers. Although there has been interest in using oral propolis for peptic ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of propolis for this purpose.
• Periodontitis. It is unclear if oral propolis or propolis extract rinse is beneficial in patients with periodontitis. Details: One small clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic periodontitis also receiving scaling and root planing shows that taking propolis 400 mg daily for 6 months reduces probing depth and improves clinical attachment by a small amount when compared with scaling and planing alone. There was no additional benefit with propolis on measures of gingivitis, plaque, or bleeding when compared with scaling and planing alone (99173). Another very small clinical study in patients with chronic periodontitis shows that irrigation of the gums with an ethanol solution containing propolis extract 20% twice weekly for 2 weeks reduces gum bleeding when compared with irrigation with ethanol 14% solution (95876). Propolis has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical study in patients with generalized or localized gingivitis or stage I periodontitis shows that taking 194 mg of a product containing propolis and mangosteen improves the modified gingival index by 31% or 40% at weeks 4 or 8, respectively, compared with 16% or 25% in those receiving placebo. No changes in probing depth, clinical attachment, plaque index, bleeding, or gingival recession were observed (106789).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with RA. Details: A small clinical study in females with RA shows that taking Brazilian propolis 508.5 mg daily for 24 weeks does not improve measures of disease activity, quality of life, or activities of daily living when compared with placebo (108515).
• Sepsis. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with sepsis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with pneumosepsis shows that taking propolis 1000 mg daily along with conventional therapy does not improve survival rates or disease severity, as measured using APACHE II and SOFA scores, when compared with placebo. The combination of propolis 1000 mg plus melatonin 20 mg daily did improve disease severity scores but had no effect on survival (108524).
• Tinea pedis. It is unclear if topical propolis is beneficial in patients with tinea pedis. Details: A case series involving students with athlete's foot found that topical treatment with a 100 mg/mL ethanolic extract of Brazilian green propolis results in less skin itching, peeling, and redness when compared with petroleum jelly placebo, but not when compared with miconazole (95880).
• Tuberculosis. Although there has been interest in using oral propolis for tuberculosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of propolis for this purpose.
• Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). It is unclear if oral propolis spray is beneficial in patients with URTI. Details: One small clinical study in patients reporting mild URTI symptoms shows that use of a propolis oral spray (M.E.D. Propolis, B Natural srl), 2-4 sprays daily, providing 6 mg of polyphenols per spray, for 5 days reduces the time to complete resolution of symptoms by 2 days when compared with placebo (105787). Propolis has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A large clinical study in children 1-5 years of age shows that taking 5-7.5 mL of a specific combination product (Chizukit, Hadas Corp Ltd.) containing propolis 50 mg/mL, echinacea extract 50 mg/mL, and vitamin C 10 mg/mL for 12 weeks reduces the number of children who experience one or more upper respiratory tract illnesses, as well as the number and duration of illnesses, when compared with placebo (48551). It is unclear if these findings are due to propolis, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Oral propolis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of 3 small clinical studies in adults with uncomplicated UTIs shows that taking combination products containing propolis, Hibiscus sabdariffa, and gelatin or xyloglucan daily for 5-10 days, then daily for two weeks each month for two months, reduces the odds of UTI recurrence by 87% when compared with control (108520). One of these studies used a specific product (Utipro Plus, Noventure) containing propolis 100 mg, xyloglucan extract 100 mg, Hibiscus sabdariffa extract 100 mg, and gelatin 50 mg once daily for 15 consecutive days each month for 6 months (101734). A small clinical study in females with recurrent UTIs shows that taking two capsules of a specific combination product (DUAB, Nutrivercell) containing propolis, cranberry, and zinc daily for 6 months reduces the number of recurrent UTIs by around 0.8 and delays the time to first recurrent UTI by around 26 days when compared with placebo (102522).
• Vaginitis. It is unclear if topical propolis is beneficial in patients with vaginitis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chronic vaginitis shows that applying 50 mL of a specific aqueous solution containing propolis 5% (Melprotect, Melbrosin International) to the vagina for 7 days can reduce symptoms and improve quality of life when compared to baseline (70068). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of control group.
• Warts. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with warts. Details: One small clinical study in adults and children with common and plane warts shows that taking propolis (Bee Propolis, Pollen) 500 mg orally daily for up to 3 months increases wart cure rates when compared with echinacea or placebo. Common warts were cured in 73% of patients taking propolis, compared to 20% taking echinacea and 8% taking placebo. Plane warts were cured in 75% of patients taking propolis, compared with 36% taking echinacea and 21% taking placebo. Neither propolis nor echinacea were effective for treating plantar warts (92800).
• Wound healing. It is unclear if topical propolis or propolis mouth rinse improves wound healing. Details: One small clinical study shows that using an aqueous alcohol mouth rinse containing propolis 5% five times daily for 1 week following sulcoplasty improves healing and reduces pain and inflammation (799). Another small clinical study in males recovering from surgery for sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease shows that using 1 mL of propolis 15% solution on the wound dressing daily for 28 days accelerates wound healing when compared with normal saline (108516) However, another small clinical trial in patients undergoing dental surgery shows that using a propolis 20% solution in a dressing is no more effective than the dressing alone for improving wound healing and reducing pain associated with the wound (99167). More evidence is needed to rate propolis for these uses.

(Read more about PROPOLIS)

EFFECTIVE

• Hemorrhagic disease. Oral or intramuscular vitamin K1 is effective for preventing hemorrhagic disease in newborns. Details: Vitamin K1 (phytonadione) administered orally or intramuscularly can prevent classic hemorrhagic disease of newborns (15,85367,85484). A single intramuscular administration of vitamin K1 1 mg is considered to be the most effective method, while oral administration of three doses of vitamin K1 1-2 mg over 8 weeks is considered to be an acceptable alternative (85506). The effects of vitamin K on late hemorrhagic disease of newborns is less clear (85367,85484). In the Netherlands, an oral dose of 25 mcg daily for 3 months was used until 2011, when it was increased to 150 mcg daily. A reduction of late intracranial vitamin K deficiency bleeding in the general pediatric population, from 1.6 per 100,000 to 1.3 per 100,000, was associated with this dose increase (102351).
• Hypoprothrombinemia. Oral or parenteral vitamin K1 is effective for treating and preventing hypoprothrombinemia. Details: Vitamin K1 (phytonadione) 2.5-25 mg, used orally or parenterally, can prevent and treat hypoprothrombinemia caused by vitamin K deficiency or induced by salicylates, sulfonamides, quinine, quinidine, or broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy (15).
• Vitamin K-dependent clotting factors deficiency (VKCFD). Oral and intravenous vitamin K1 is the primary treatment for VKCFD. Details: Oral supplementation with vitamin K 10 mg two to three times weekly seems to prevent major hemorrhages and reduce mucocutaneous bleeding in individuals with VKCFD. Also, intravenous vitamin K may improve the prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) values in these patients. While vitamin K supplementation is the primary treatment method for VKCFD, the response to treatment varies significantly (85481).
• Warfarin anticoagulation. Oral and intravenous vitamin K1 reverse warfarin-related excessive anticoagulation. Evidence for the use of oral vitamin K1 in patients with an unstable INR is conflicting. Details: Taking vitamin K1 (phytonadione) orally or parenterally, but not subcutaneously, can counteract excessive warfarin anticoagulation and restore therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) levels. Usually a single dose of 1-5 mg is used (85406,85425,85429). Vitamin K might also be effective for stabilizing warfarin anticoagulation in patients with low intake of vitamin K. Patients with a low dietary vitamin K intake are significantly more likely to have an unstable INR than those who ingest higher amounts of vitamin K (16803). It is thought that vitamin K-depleted patients become more sensitive when vitamin K is ingested, even in small quantities, resulting in erratic or unstable INR (16804). One small clinical study and one small retrospective chart review show that taking oral vitamin K1 (phytonadione) 100-150 mcg daily improves INR stability in patients taking warfarin who previously had an unstable INR (16805,16806). However, a larger clinical study found no significant differences in INR stability in patients taking vitamin K 100 mcg daily when compared with placebo (16807). Also, some research suggests that, although taking vitamin K 1250 mcg daily may reduce INR in patients with excessive warfarin anticoagulation more significantly than placebo, there may not be a significant difference in the risk of bleeding complications (23380). It is important to keep in mind that, if a patient is stabilized on warfarin therapy plus vitamin K supplementation, discontinuing vitamin K can significantly increase the INR within 2-3 weeks after discontinuation (17714). The most recent guidelines by the American College of Chest Physicians do not recommend routine use of vitamin K supplementation for patients on warfarin therapy with unstable INR (94926). However, the previous guidelines recommended vitamin K 100-200 mcg daily for these patients. Therefore, some providers still use vitamin K for this purpose (16808).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Osteoporosis. Oral vitamin K might reduce the risk of fractures and bone loss in patients with osteoporosis. However, it may not be beneficial in patients at risk for developing osteoporosis. Details: Although observational and clinical research on dietary and supplemental vitamin K for osteoporosis has been conflicting (14364,85392,85445,102354), overall, vitamin K supplementation seems to slightly reduce fracture risk (102354). A meta-analysis combining data from 36 heterogeneous studies in osteoporotic or postmenopausal patients shows that taking different regimens of either vitamin K1 or vitamin K2 is associated with a small reduction in clinical fractures (from 3.1% to 2.2%), but not with changes in vertebral fractures or BMD when compared with control (102354). This analysis is limited by the high variability in study designs and a lack of subgroup analyses stratifying different patient populations and forms of vitamin K. An older meta-analysis of 19 clinical studies in osteoporotic or postmenopausal patients shows that taking vitamin K2 (menaquinone) 45 mg, primarily used in the MK-4 form, daily does not reduce the risk of fractures when compared with control, although there was a non-significant trend towards a reduction (91451). A sensitivity analysis that excluded the largest negative study of over 4000 postmenopausal Japanese females with mild osteoporosis (85456), showed that vitamin K2 45 mg daily reduces the risk of fractures by 53% and improves lumbar and vertebral BMD in patients with osteoporosis when compared with control (91451). This effect was not seen in patients without osteoporosis (91451). Vitamin K2 also does not seem to benefit patients with osteopenia. A recent clinical trial in postmenopausal patients with osteopenia shows that taking a larger dose of vitamin K2 (375 mcg, MK-7) with calcium 800 mg and vitamin D 1500 IU daily for 3 years does not seem to affect BMD, bone turnover, or bone microarchitecture when compared with placebo (105035). Vitamin K1 (phytonadione) has also been evaluated, with mixed findings. One clinical study in postmenopausal patients with osteopenia shows that taking vitamin K1 5 mg daily with calcium 1500 and vitamin D 800 IU for up to 4 years reduces clinical fractures, but does not reduce clinical fragility fractures or improve BMD, when compared with placebo and vitamin D with calcium (85453). In healthy, non-osteoporotic patients ages 60-80 years, one clinical study shows that taking vitamin K1 500 mcg daily with calcium 600 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 3 years does not affect BMD, despite increased plasma vitamin K levels and reduced undercarboxylated osteocalcin concentrations, when compared with taking calcium and vitamin D alone (16404). The same null effect on BMD and a reduced undercarboxylated osteocalcin was shown in a small clinical study in patients with Crohn disease without osteoporosis, taking vitamin K1 1-2 mg in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU and calcium 500 mg daily for 12 months (91454).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Intraventricular hemorrhage. Oral vitamin K does not reduce the risk of periventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. Details: A meta-analysis of results from clinical research shows that administering vitamin K to pregnant patients at risk for very preterm birth does not reduce the overall risk of periventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants, perinatal mortality, or the associated neurological injury by the age of 7 years when compared to control. A subgroup analysis shows that vitamin K might reduce the risk of severe periventricular hemorrhage by 42% in preterm infants. However, when trials with inadequate blinding were excluded, this result was not statistically significant (85469).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral vitamin K2 improves athletic performance. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking vitamin K2 (menaquinone) 320 mcg orally daily for 4 weeks followed by 160 mg daily for 4 weeks, increases maximal cardiac output by 12% when compared with placebo in trained athletes performing standardized cycle ergometer exercise tests (95937).
• Beta-thalassemia. Oral vitamin K2 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking the menaquinone-7 (MK-7) form of vitamin K2 50 mcg daily plus vitamin D3 (calcitriol) 5 mcg daily for 12 months modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine when compared to baseline in children with beta-thalassemia aged 3-18 years (91456). It is not clear if this improvement can be attributed to vitamin K, vitamin D3, or the combination.
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if dietary intake of vitamin K2 reduces the risk of breast cancer. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin K2 (menaquinone) or vitamin K1 (phytonadione) is not associated with a reduced risk of premenopausal or postmenopausal breast cancer (85474).
• Cancer. It is unclear if dietary intake of vitamin K reduces the risk of cancer or cancer-related mortality. Details: One large population study involving healthy German patients has found that consuming more than 42-46 mcg of vitamin K2 (menaquinone) daily is associated with a 27% reduced risk of cancer mortality, but not cancer incidence, when compared with consuming less than 23-26 mcg daily. Dietary intake of vitamin K1 (phytonadione) was not associated with the risk of cancer or cancer mortality (85474). Another population study involving Mediterranean patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease has found that consuming about 630 mcg of vitamin K1 daily is associated with a 46% lower risk of cancer mortality when compared with consuming about 171 mcg of vitamin K1 daily. However, higher dietary intake of vitamin K2, 87 mcg daily, was not associated with a lower risk of cancer mortality when compared to those with lower dietary intake (79 mcg daily) (91452). Reasons for these discrepancies may relate to the definitions for high and low intake, the use of different databases to calculate vitamin K intake, and the different populations studied.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if dietary or supplemental vitamin K reduces the risk of CVD events; the available research is conflicting. Details: Most population research, including a meta-analysis of 21 observational cohort studies, has found that dietary intake of vitamin K1 (phytonadione) or vitamin K2 (menaquinone) is not associated with reduced risk for most cardiovascular events, such as CVD mortality, nonfatal MI, or stroke, although there might be a slightly reduced risk for CHD (85414,85482,91452,102353,103922). However, some population studies have found benefit. Observational research in a Danish cohort aged 50-65 years with no history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease at baseline shows that those in the highest quintile of dietary vitamin K1 intake have a 21% lower risk of CVD-related hospitalization and complications, such as ischemic heart disease, ischemic stroke, or peripheral artery disease, over 17-22 years when compared with the lowest quintile of intake. This inverse association tapers off at intakes above 100 mcg daily. For vitamin K2 intake, the highest quintile has a 14% lower risk of hospitalization when compared with the lowest quintile, although the association is U-shaped, indicating an increased risk at high doses. The researchers theorize that this may be due to the fact that vitamin K2-rich foods include cheese, eggs, and butter (109910,109920). There is also interest in using vitamin K to slow aortic valve calcification (AVC) and coronary artery calcification (CAC), which are CVD risk factors. In healthy patients ages 60-80 years with pre-existing CAC, taking a multivitamin with vitamin K1 (phytonadione) 500 mcg orally daily for 3 years reduces CAC progression by 6% when compared with the multivitamin alone (85461). However, research in patients with AVC has found no benefit. One small clinical study in patients on hemodialysis shows that taking the menaquinone-7 form of vitamin K2, 200 mcg orally daily for 1 year, does not affect the rate of AVC progression when compared with placebo (102352). Also, clinical research in males with significant AVC shows that taking the menaquinone-7 form of vitamin K2 720 mcg and vitamin D 25 mcg orally daily for 2 years does not reduce the rate of AVC progression or the rate of cardiovascular events, heart valve surgery, or all-cause mortality when compared with placebo (109916).
• Cataracts. It is unclear if dietary vitamin K reduces the risk of cataracts in older adults. Details: A secondary analysis of results from clinical research has found that higher dietary vitamin K1 (phytonadione) intake over a mean 5.6 years' follow-up is associated with a lower risk of cataracts and a lower incidence of cataract surgery in older adults at high risk for cardiovascular disease. The hazard ratio for developing cataracts was 0.71 and the hazard ratio for cataract surgery was 0.75 for people in the highest tertile of dietary vitamin K1 intake when compared with the lowest tertile (95936).
• Cognitive impairment. It is unclear if dietary vitamin K alters the rate of decline in adults with cognitive impairment. Details: Clinical research in adults aged 55-75 years with overweight or obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cognitive impairment shows that the largest increases in dietary vitamin K intake over a 2-year period are linked to a slower rate of cognitive decline when compared with the lowest increases in intake. This is demonstrated by higher scores on the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and verbal fluency tests, and a greater number of patients maintaining an MMSE score of at least 24 (109919).
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if dietary intake of vitamin K2 reduces the risk of colorectal cancer. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin K2 (menaquinone) or vitamin K1 (phytonadione) is not associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer (85474).
• Cystic fibrosis. It is unclear if oral vitamin K improves coagulopathy in patients with cystic fibrosis. Details: Suboptimal vitamin K status is common in patients with cystic fibrosis, especially those with pancreatic insufficiency, due to problems with fat digestion (85359,85479). Preliminary clinical research in patients with cystic fibrosis shows that taking vitamin K 1-5 mg orally for one month might decrease osteocalcin levels when compared with baseline, which suggests a lower risk of bone fractures (103920). Also, a small clinical trial in adults and children with cystic fibrosis and pancreatic insufficiency shows that taking a supplement containing fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E, and K for an average of 8.6 months reduces the number of patients with abnormal levels of protein induced by vitamin K absence (PIVKA-II), a defective form of prothrombin (85374).
• Depression. It is unclear if dietary intake of vitamin K reduces depression. Details: Population research has found that a dietary intake of vitamin K greater than 232 mcg daily is associated with reduced odds of depressive symptoms when compared with intakes of less than 83 mcg daily in older adults who are not taking vitamin D supplements. For every 100 mcg increase in vitamin K intake per day, the study found an 18% reduction in odds of depressive symptoms. However, there was no association identified in individuals taking vitamin D (100181). The effect of vitamin K for the prevention or treatment of clinical depression has not been investigated.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral vitamin K1 improves glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Details: A small clinical study in patients with diabetes who are taking oral antidiabetes medications shows that taking vitamin K2 (MK-7) 180 mcg twice daily for 12 weeks seems to reduce glycated hemoglobin by 1.6%, compared with a slight increase in the placebo group (105034). This study is limited due to high dropout rate in the placebo group.
• EGFR inhibitor-induced acneiform rash. It is unclear if topical vitamin K is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of acneiform rash caused by EGFR inhibitors. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults receiving treatment with cetuximab, an EGFR inhibitor, shows that applying vitamin K1 (phytonadione) 0.1% cream (Vigorskin, Merck Serono SpA) twice daily to the face and trunk for 12 weeks may modestly reduce the percentage of patients who develop a moderate to severe acneiform rash (91455). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group. In patients with an existing rash after receiving the EGFR inhibitors cetuximab and panitumumab, a small clinical study shows that applying vitamin K1 (phytonadione) 1% ointment twice daily for 8 weeks to half of the affected area does not reduce the number of acneiform eruptions when compared with using placebo ointment on the other half of the affected area (103919). Patients in this study were allowed to use concomitant antibiotics and moisturizing agents, which may have confounded the results.
• Kidney failure. It is unclear if oral vitamin K2 reduces the incidence or severity of muscle cramps in adults with kidney failure. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients on maintenance hemodialysis for at least 3 months with treatment-resistant muscle cramps shows that taking the menaquinone form of vitamin K2 360 mcg orally daily for 8 weeks reduces the frequency, severity, and duration of muscle cramps when compared with placebo (109917).
• Kidney transplant. It is unclear if vitamin K is beneficial for reducing cardiovascular risk in kidney transplant recipients. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with a stable kidney transplant for at least 1 year shows that taking vitamin K (menadiol diphosphate) 5 mg orally three times weekly for 1 year does not reduce aortic stiffness or coronary artery calcification, which are markers of cardiovascular disease, when compared with placebo (109913). The effects of long-term supplementation are unclear.
• Liver cancer. Small clinical studies suggests that vitamin K2 reduces mortality and the risk for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. Details: Meta-analyses of 9-11 small clinical trials in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma show that adding vitamin K2 45 mg daily for up to 3 years seems to reduce cancer recurrence by 9.5% and reduce the risk of mortality by 7% when compared with control. Meta-analyses of 3-4 small clinical trials in patients with non-resectable carcinoma show that taking vitamin K2 45 mg for up to 2 years seems to reduce cancer recurrence by 3% and reduce mortality by 16% when compared with control (105032). Most of the included studies were conducted in Japan, so it is unclear if these results are generalizable to other geographic locations.
• Liver disease. It is unclear if dietary intake of vitamin K reduces the risk of liver disease. Details: A small observational study in patients with chronic liver failure due to cholestatic liver disease has found that receiving intramuscular vitamin K1 10 mg daily for an average of 16 days is associated with a lower risk of death when compared with control (103926).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if dietary intake of vitamin K reduces the risk of lung cancer. Details: Population research has found that consuming greater than 42-46 mcg of vitamin K2 (menaquinone) daily is associated with a 62% lower risk of lung cancer occurrence and a 59% lower risk of lung cancer mortality when compared to those who consume less than 23-26 mcg of vitamin K2 daily. Dietary intake of vitamin K1 (phytonadione) is not associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer or lung cancer mortality (85474).
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). It is unclear if topical vitamin K reduces cutaneous adverse effects of MS treatment. Details: In patients with relapsing-remitting MS, burning and pain can accompany subcutaneous interferon treatment. Preliminary clinical research shows that topical application of vitamin K cream (dose not specified) for 8 weeks reduces burning by approximately 8% and pain by 9% when compared with no prophylactic treatment. Redness of the skin is also reduced with vitamin K (91453).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if dietary intake of vitamin K reduces overall mortality. Details: Observational research in healthy older adults has found that serum vitamin K levels 0.5 nmol/L or less, which corresponds to consuming about 50% of the recommended vitamin K adequate intake, is associated with a 19% higher risk of overall mortality when compared with higher serum levels of vitamin K (103922). In a Danish cohort of adults with a median age of 56 years at baseline, the comparative risk for all-cause mortality between the highest and lowest quintiles of K1 intake over a period of 17-23 years was 0.76. The risk for cardiovascular mortality was 0.72, and the risk of cancer-related mortality in smokers or former smokers, specifically, was 0.8. However, the correlation tapered off above a daily intake of 100 mcg (109911).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if dietary intake of vitamin K reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer. Details: Observational research in over 100,000 Americans aged 55-74 years at baseline has found no association between dietary vitamin K2 intake and pancreatic cancer incidence over an average follow-up of 9 years. However, the hazard ratio for development of pancreatic cancer was 0.57 for the highest quintile of dietary vitamin K1 intake when compared with the lowest quintile (109912).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if vitamin K improves PCOS symptoms. Details: Small clinical study in patients with PCOS show that taking vitamin K2 (menaquinone-7) 90 mcg daily for 8 weeks does not reduce fasting blood glucose, acne, hirsutism, or weight, although it improves depression and seems to reduce fasting insulin, when compared with placebo (105036,109918).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if dietary intake of vitamin K reduces the risk of prostate cancer. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin K2 (menaquinone), but not vitamin K1 (phytonadione), is associated with a reduced risk of prostate cancer, particularly advanced prostate cancer (85443,85474).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if oral vitamin K improves RA symptoms. Details: One small clinical study in patients with RA shows that adding the MK-7 form of vitamin K2 (menaquinone) 100 mcg daily to treatment with conventional antirheumatic agents for 3 months improves disease activity and inflammatory markers when compared with antirheumatic agents alone. When compared to the control group, vitamin K2 reduced disease activity scores by 41% (91449). However, another small clinical study in patients with mild to moderate RA shows that taking vitamin K1 (phytonadione) 10 mg daily for 8 weeks with conventional antirheumatic agents does not improve disease activity or inflammatory markers when compared with placebo (100182). These contrasting outcomes may be related to the type of vitamin K used, the duration of treatment, and the severity of the illness.
• Rosacea. Although there is interest in using topical vitamin K1 for rosacea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin K for this condition.
• Stroke. It is unclear if dietary intake of vitamin K1 reduces the risk of stroke. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin K1 is not associated with a reduced risk of stroke (85482).
• Wound healing. Although there is interest in using topical vitamin K1 for wound healing, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin K for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate vitamin K for these uses.

(Read more about VITAMIN K)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately short-term (15). ...when sodium phosphate is used rectally and appropriately, no more than once every 24 hours, short-term (104471). Long-term use or high doses used orally or rectally require monitoring of serum electrolytes (2494,2495,2496,2497,2498,3092,112922). ...when used intravenously. Potassium phosphate is an FDA-approved prescription drug (15).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when phosphate (expressed as phosphorus) intake exceeds the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4 grams daily for adults under 70 years and 3 grams daily for adults older than 70. Hyperphosphatemia, resulting in electrolyte disturbances, alterations in calcium homeostasis, and calcification of nonskeletal tissues, may occur (7555). ...when used rectally more frequently than once every 24 hours, in excessive doses, with longer retention enema time, or in older patients with comorbidity or renal impairment (112922). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns that this may increase the risk of hyperphosphatemia, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalances leading to kidney and heart damage (104471).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately at recommended dietary allowances (RDAs). The daily RDAs are: children 1-3 years, 460 mg; children 4-8 years, 500 mg; males and females 9-18 years, 1250 mg (7555). ...when sodium phosphate is used rectally and appropriately, no more than once every 24 hours, short-term in children 2 years and older (104471). ...when used intravenously. Intravenous potassium phosphate is an FDA-approved prescription drug (15).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when phosphate (expressed as phosphorus) intake exceeds the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 3 grams daily for children 1-8 years of age and 4 grams daily for children 9 years and older. Hyperphosphatemia, resulting in electrolyte disturbances, alterations in calcium homeostasis, and calcification of nonskeletal tissues, may occur (7555). ...when sodium phosphate is used rectally more frequently than once every 24 hours, or in children under 2 years of age or with Hirchsprung disease (112922). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns that these uses may increase the risk of hyperphosphatemia, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalances leading to kidney and heart damage (104471).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately at the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) of 1250 mg daily for individuals 14-18 years of age and 700 mg daily for those over 18 years of age (7555). ...when sodium phosphate is used rectally and appropriately short-term (15). ...when used intravenously. Intravenous potassium phosphate is an FDA-approved prescription drug (15).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when phosphate (expressed as phosphorus) intake exceeds the tolerable upper intake level (UL). Hyperphosphatemia, resulting in electrolyte disturbances, alterations in calcium homeostasis, and calcification of nonskeletal tissues, may occur. The UL during pregnancy is 3.5 grams daily. During lactation, the UL is 4 grams daily (7555).

(Read more about PHOSPHATE SALTS)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in doses up to 100 mEq total potassium daily, not to exceed 200 mEq in a 24-hour period (95010,107989). Oral potassium chloride and potassium citrate are FDA-approved prescription products (95010,107989). Larger doses increase the risk of hyperkalemia (15). ...when administered intravenously (IV) at appropriate infusion rates (95011). Parenteral potassium is an FDA-approved prescription product (15,95011). A tolerable upper intake level (UL) for potassium has not been established; however, potassium levels should be monitored in individuals at increased risk for hyperkalemia, such as those with kidney disease, heart failure, and adrenal insufficiency (100310,107966).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in dietary amounts. A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for healthy individuals (6243,100310).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in dietary amounts of 40-80 mEq daily (15). A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for healthy individuals (100310).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Propolis has been used with apparent safety in clinical research at doses of up to 1500 mg daily (95883,99173,102520,102521). ...when used topically. Propolis as a 3% or 10% ointment, 0.5% cream, 30% mouth rinse, or 15% solution has been used with apparent safety in small clinical studies (799,1926,6602,8663,17629,17664,17665,92793,92800,95882)(99171,99173,102519,102521,105785,105786,108516,108523,109985).

PREGNANCY:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately during lactation. Propolis 300 mg daily has been used for 4-10 months in one clinical study with no apparent adverse effects to nursing infants (102518).

(Read more about PROPOLIS)

LIKELY SAFE ...when vitamin K1 (phytonadione) or vitamin K2 (menaquinone) is used orally and appropriately. Vitamin K1 up to 10 mg daily and vitamin K2 up to 45 mg daily have been safely used in clinical trials lasting up to 2 years. A tolerable upper intake level for vitamin K in adults has not been set (54,55,58,6799,7135,14364). ...when vitamin K1 (phytonadione) is used parenterally and appropriately. Vitamin K1 (phytonadione) in oral and injectable form is an FDA-approved drug (7135).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when vitamin K1 (phytonadione) 0. 1% is used topically in a cream or ointment for up to 12 weeks (91455,103919).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when vitamin K1 (phytonadione) is used orally or parenterally and appropriately. Vitamin K1 (phytonadione) in oral and injectable form is FDA approved for use in children. A tolerable upper intake level for vitamin K in children has not been set (7135).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts that do not exceed the daily adequate intake level (AI). A tolerable upper intake level for vitamin K in pregnancy and lactation has not been set (7135).

(Read more about VITAMIN K)

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking phosphate salts with bisphosphonates might increase the risk of hypocalcemia.  Details Combining bisphosphonates and phosphate can cause hypocalcemia. In one report, hypocalcemic tetany developed in a patient taking alendronate (Fosamax) who received a large dose of phosphate salts as a pre-operative laxative (14589).

ERDAFITINIB (Balversa) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = A Taking erdafitinib with phosphate salts increases the risk of hyperphosphatemia.  Details Erdafitinib increases phosphate levels. It is recommended that patients taking erdafitinib restrict phosphate intake to no more than 600-800 mg daily (104470).

FUTIBATINIB (Lytgobi) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = A Taking futibatinib with phosphate salts increases the risk of hyperphosphatemia.  Details Futibatinib can cause hyperphosphatemia, as reported in 88% of patients in clinical studies. In addition, 77% of patients in clinical studies required use of a phosphate binder to manage hyperphosphatemia. Phosphate salts should generally be avoided by people taking this medication (112912).

(Read more about PHOSPHATE SALTS)

ACE INHIBITORS (ACEIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Using ACEIs with high doses of potassium increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details ACEIs block the actions of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and reduce potassium excretion (95628). Concomitant use of these drugs with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15,23207). However, concomitant use of these drugs with moderate dietary potassium intake (about 3775-5200 mg daily) does not increase serum potassium levels (95628).

ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKERS (ARBs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Using ARBs with high doses of potassium increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details ARBs block the actions of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and reduce potassium excretion (95628). Concomitant use of these drugs with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15,23207). However, concomitant use of these drugs with moderate dietary potassium intake (about 3775-5200 mg daily) does not increase serum potassium levels (95628).

POTASSIUM-SPARING DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Concomitant use increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details Using potassium-sparing diuretics with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, propolis might increase the risk of bleeding when taken with antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs.  Details In vitro research shows that propolis water extract and the propolis constituent, caffeic acid phenethyl ester, can inhibit platelet aggregation (50794,95885). Additionally, evidence from an animal model shows that taking propolis in addition to warfarin decreases INR, suggesting that propolis can decrease the effectiveness of warfarin (95874).

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, high doses of propolis might increase blood levels of drugs metabolized by CYP1A2.  Details In vitro research shows that propolis extract can inhibit CYP1A2 (92797,92799). However, animal research shows that propolis extract does not significantly affect CYP1A2 activity when administered to rats at doses up to 250 mg/kg. It is postulated that the constituents of propolis that inhibit CYP1A2 in vitro do not have significant effects in vivo due to low bioavailability and hepatic first-pass effect (92797). This effect has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, high doses of propolis might increase blood levels of drugs metabolized by CYP2C19.  Details In vitro research shows that propolis extract can inhibit CYP2C19 (92797,92799). However, animal research shows that propolis extract does not significantly affect CYP2C19 activity when administered to rats at doses up to 250 mg/kg. It is postulated that the constituents of propolis that inhibit CYP2C19 in vitro do not have significant effects in vivo due to low bioavailability and hepatic first-pass effect (92797). This effect has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, high doses of propolis might increase blood levels of drugs metabolized by CYP2C9.  Details In vitro research shows that propolis extract can inhibit CYP2C9 (92797,92799). However, animal research shows that propolis extract does not significantly affect CYP2C9 activity when administered to rats at doses up to 250 mg/kg. It is postulated that the constituents of propolis that inhibit CYP2C9 in vitro do not have significant effects in vivo due to low bioavailability and hepatic first-pass effect (92797). This effect has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, high doses of propolis might increase blood levels of drugs metabolized by CYP2D6.  Details In vitro research shows that propolis extract can inhibit CYP2D6 (92797,92799). However, animal research shows that propolis extract does not significantly affect CYP2D6 activity when administered to rats at doses up to 250 mg/kg. It is postulated that the constituents of propolis that inhibit CYP2D6 in vitro do not have significant effects in vivo due to low bioavailability and hepatic first-pass effect (92797). This effect has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, propolis might increase levels of drugs metabolized by CYP2E1.  Details In vitro research shows that propolis can inhibit CYP2E1 (92799). This effect has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, high doses of propolis might increase blood levels of drugs metabolized by CYP3A4.  Details Some in vitro research shows that propolis extract can inhibit CYP3A4 (92797); however, other in vitro research shows that propolis has no effect on CYP3A4 activity (92799). Furthermore, animal research shows that propolis extract does not significantly affect CYP3A4 activity when administered to rats at doses up to 250 mg/kg. It is postulated that the constituents of propolis that might in inhibit CYP3A4 in vitro do not have significant effects in vivo due to low bioavailability and hepatic first-pass effect (92797). This effect has not been reported in humans.

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, propolis might decrease the effectiveness of warfarin.  Details Animal research shows that taking propolis in addition to warfarin decreases the international normalized ratio (INR) (95874). This effect has not been reported in humans.

(Read more about PROPOLIS)

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Vitamin K can antagonize and reverse the therapeutic effects of warfarin.  Details Vitamin K antagonizes the effects of warfarin (15,23380,25507,25508,85425,85429). Excessive vitamin K intake, either from supplements or from changes in the diet, can reduce the anticoagulant effect of warfarin (15).

(Read more about VITAMIN K)

General ...Orally, intravenously, and rectally, phosphate salts are generally well tolerated when used appropriately and/or as prescribed.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, anal irritation, bloating, diarrhea, headache, gastrointestinal irritation, hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia, malaise, nausea, sleep disturbance, and vomiting.
Rectally: Hyperphosphatemia and hypocalcemia.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Extraskeletal calcification.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, a case of allergic acute coronary syndrome e., Kounis syndrome) is reported in a 43-year-old female after ingesting a specific sodium phosphate laxative product (Travad oral). She presented with maculopapular rash that progressed to anaphylaxis and a non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. The patient recovered after hospitalization for 3 days with medical management (112894).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, phosphate salts can cause gastrointestinal irritation, nausea, abdominal pain, bloating, anal irritation, and vomiting (15,2494,2495,2496,2497,93846,93848,93850,93851,93853,107008). Sodium and potassium phosphates can cause diarrhea (15). Aluminum phosphate can cause constipation (15). A large comparative study shows that, when taken orally as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy, sodium phosphate is associated with gastric mucosal lesions in about 4% of patients (93868).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, phosphate salts can commonly cause malaise (93846). Headaches and sleep disturbance may also occur (93848,93851).

Renal ...Orally, use of sodium phosphate for bowel cleansing has been associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury in some patients (93863). However, a pooled analysis of clinical research suggests that results are not consistent for all patients (93864). Some evidence suggests that female gender, probably due to lower body weight, iron-deficiency anemia, dehydration, and chronic kidney disease are all associated with an increased risk of sodium phosphate-induced kidney dysfunction (93865).

Other ...Orally, phosphate salts can cause fluid and electrolyte disturbances including hyperphosphatemia and hypocalcemia, and extraskeletal calcification. Potassium phosphates can cause hyperkalemia. Sodium phosphates can cause hypernatremia and hypokalemia (15,2494,2495,2496,2497,107008).
Rectally, phosphate salts can cause fluid and electrolyte disturbances including hyperphosphatemia and hypocalcemia (15,112922).
Deaths related to intake of oral or rectal phosphate salts are rare and most have occurred in infants and are related to overdose (93866). However, death has also been reported in elderly patients using sodium phosphate enemas, mainly at standard doses of 250 mL (93867).

(Read more about PHOSPHATE SALTS)

General ...Orally or intravenously, potassium is generally well-tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, belching, diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, and vomiting.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
All ROAs: High potassium levels can cause arrhythmia, heart block, hypotension, and mental confusion.

Cardiovascular ...Orally or intravenously, high potassium levels can cause hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, heart block, or cardiac arrest (15,16,3385,95011,95626,95630).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally or intravenously, high doses of potassium can cause, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and flatulence (95010,95011). Bleeding duodenal ulcers have also been associated with ingestion of slow-release potassium tablets (69625,69672).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally or intravenously, high potassium levels can cause paresthesia, generalized weakness, flaccid paralysis, listlessness, vertigo, or mental confusion (15,16,3385,95011).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

General ...Orally and topically, propolis seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Headache.
Topically: Contact cheilitis and contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Severe allergic reactions in sensitive individuals.

Dermatologic ...Propolis can cause allergic reactions and acute oral mucositis with ulceration from the use of the propolis-containing lozenges (2632).
Topically, propolis-containing products, including some cosmetics, can cause eczematous contact dermatitis, erythema multiforme-like contact dermatitis, or allergic contact cheilitis (2632,15647,92796,92798,95878,95882,102517).
Patients allergic to bees or bee products may be more likely to experience allergic reactions to propolis.

Genitourinary ...Vulvar eczema caused by propolis sensitization after topical therapy has been reported (70067).

Hepatic ...Orally, propolis may cause an increase in liver enzymes when used long-term at high doses. In one case, a 30-year-old male presented with persistent abnormal liver enzymes for six months. With other causes ruled out, the patient disclosed using more than 10 propolis lozenges per day for several months to treat a sore throat. Upon discontinuation of the propolis lozenges, liver enzymes returned to normal (105788). Despite concerns presented in this case, analyses of small clinical studies suggest that propolis may have hepatoprotective effects when used at doses of 500-1000 mg daily for up to one year (108521,108522).

Immunologic ...In one case report, a 36-year-old female developed severe erythematous papules and patches with edema of the face, neck, arms, abdomen, and thighs after consuming propolis solution for a few weeks. After symptom resolution, a patch test showed an extreme positive reaction to propolis (106443). In another case, laryngeal edema and severe anaphylactic reaction has been reported in a patient who used topical propolis for the treatment of acute pharyngitis. The patient died due to complications of hypoxia that resulted from the allergic reaction (70063).
Topically, propolis-containing products can cause allergic contact dermatitis, including cheilitis, when used on or near the lips or mouth (15647,92796,92798,102517). Propolis-containing lozenges can cause allergic reactions as well as acute oral mucositis with ulceration (2632).
Patients allergic to bees or bee products may be more likely to experience allergic reactions to propolis.

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, propolis may cause headache in some patients. In one clinical trial, around 7% of patients taking propolis 250 mg twice daily for 4 months reported mild headache (105786).

Renal ...In one case report, a 59-year-old male with cholangiocarcinoma developed acute kidney failure requiring hemodialysis after taking a Brazilian preparation of propolis 5 mL three times daily for 2 weeks. Renal function improved when propolis was discontinued. The patient restarted taking propolis and symptoms developed again and the patient again required hemodialysis. Symptoms of renal failure improved when propolis was finally discontinued. This product was not screened for contaminants; however, family members of this patient used the same product without apparent adverse effects (14300).

(Read more about PROPOLIS)

General ...Orally, vitamin K is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Diarrhea, nausea, and stomach upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Intravenously: There have been rare cases of anaphylaxis and hyperbilirubinemia (in infants).

Dermatologic ...Orally, intake of vitamin K2 (menaquinone) along with calcium and vitamin D3 can cause an increased incidence of skin and skin appendage lesions compared to taking calcium and vitamin D3 alone. However, the risk of this adverse event is low, with 0.5 incidences per 100 patient-years occurring for patients treated with vitamin K, calcium, and vitamin D3 and 0.1 incidences per 100 patient-years occurring for patients treated with calcium and vitamin D3 alone (85467).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, vitamin K can cause mild to moderate gastrointestinal side effects (91450,91451). The most common effects include nausea, abdominal pain, and diarrhea (91450,91451).

Hepatic ...Orally, vitamin K3 (menadione) has been linked to hepatotoxicity. Vitamin K3 is no longer used therapeutically in North America because it has been linked to hepatic toxicity and jaundice in animal research (7135).

Other ...Intravenously, vitamin K can cause reactions that resemble hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis (85389). These reactions are rare. It is unclear whether the adverse effect is caused by the drug or a component of the solution. There have been very rare cases of hyperbilirubinemia, particularly in premature neonates, following large doses of vitamin K (15).

(Read more about VITAMIN K)