Lecithin Granules by DC

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Hyperlipidemia. Clinical research suggests that alpha-linolenic acid does not lower lipid levels in adults with hyperlipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of 20 small clinical trials in patients with hyperlipidemia shows that taking foods or supplements containing alpha-linolenic acid does not reduce lipid levels when compared with control (104256). The findings from this analysis are limited by the heterogeneity of the alpha-linolenic acid supplementation regimens and patient populations.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Atherosclerosis. Some research suggests that increasing dietary alpha-linolenic acid intake may decrease atherosclerosis. Details: Epidemiological research in White adults has found that high dietary intake of linolenic acid is associated with reduced calcified atherosclerotic plaques in the coronary arteries. Most dietary linolenic acid is alpha-linolenic acid (only a small fraction is gamma-linolenic acid). For every gram of linolenic acid consumed, risk of coronary artery calcification appears to decrease by 62% (12990). The effects of linolenic acid intake in other populations are unclear.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for atopic dermatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if alpha-linolenic acid is beneficial in patients with ADHD. Details: Small clinical trials show that taking alpha-linolenic acid does not improve symptoms of previously untreated ADHD in children aged 6-16 years. Taking alpha-linolenic acid 1 gram daily for 8 weeks, or taking a combination of alpha-linolenic acid 60 mg, linoleic acid 240 mg, mineral oil 95 mg, and alpha-tocopherol 5 mg twice daily for 7 weeks does not affect ADHD symptom scores when compared with placebo (100660,100661). However, these studies might have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Cancer. It is unclear if increased dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid affects mortality in patients with cancer. Details: A large meta-analysis of prospective, observational studies has found that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid is associated with a 6% increased risk of mortality from cancer when compared with low dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid (106661).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Population research has found that increased dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid may have some benefit for CVD, but results from clinical research are generally less positive. Details: A large meta-analysis of prospective, observational studies has found that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid is associated with an 8% or 11% reduced risk of mortality from CVD or coronary heart disease (CHD), respectively, when compared with low dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid. A dose-response analysis and meta-analysis show that a 1-gram increase in daily dietary intake is associated with a 5% reduction in CVD mortality (106661,107741). Other population research has found that consumption of 1-2 grams of dietary alpha-linolenic acid daily is associated with a reduced risk of a first myocardial infarction (MI) by as much as 59% in both males and females (7152,7156). The risk of fatal ischemic heart disease is reduced by 65% in females (7153). In patients who have had a previous MI, following a Mediterranean diet rich in alpha-linolenic acid (1.2-1.6 grams daily) and low in saturated fat and cholesterol for 27 months appears to reduce the risk for a second MI by 73% and the risk for death from any cause by 70% when compared to the standard postinfarction diet (7150). Overall, increasing dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid by 1-1.2 grams daily appears to reduce the risk of fatal coronary heart disease by 20% in people with no history of heart disease and by 20% or more in people with existing heart disease (12978,91403). However, clinical research has not supported these findings. A meta-analysis of a small number of low to moderate quality clinical studies shows that higher intake of alpha-linolenic acid has little to no benefit for primary prevention of CVD, and does not reduce all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, or CHD events. Any reductions in CVD mortality, arrhythmias, or CHD events in individual trials are very small (103955). This may be due in part to the difficulty in separating the effects of alpha-linolenic acid from those of other dietary, lifestyle, or drug interventions (12917). Some research suggests alpha-linolenic acid has a greater effect on coronary heart disease when intake of fish oils is low (12989).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for COPD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral alpha-linolenic acid improves cognitive function in healthy adults.
• Crohn disease. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for Crohn disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Crohn disease. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for Crohn disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral alpha-linolenic acid is beneficial in patients with depression. Details: Clinical research in patients aged 60-80 years who have had a myocardial infarction shows that consuming margarine containing alpha-linolenic acid 2 grams daily for 40 months does not reduce symptoms of depression when compared with placebo margarine (104978).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral alpha-linolenic acid is beneficial in patients with diabetes. Details: Epidemiological research involving overweight and obese individuals has found that eating at least 1.69 grams alpha-linolenic acid daily is associated with a 45% to 47% reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with eating only 0.73 grams daily. However, higher intake of alpha-linolenic acid does not appear to be associated with a reduced risk of diabetes in people who are not overweight (101025). In patients with diabetes, epidemiological research shows that lower intake of alpha-linolenic acid is associated with an increased risk of diabetic nephropathy (101024). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research in adults with diabetes who are stable on oral antidiabetic medications shows that adding alpha-linolenic acid 1.5-7.4 grams daily, in the form of flaxseed oil, walnuts, or chia seeds, to a regular diet for 2-12 months does not improve glycemic control when compared with placebo (98002).
• Influenza. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for influenza, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Hypertension. Some research suggests that increasing dietary alpha-linolenic acid may decrease the risk of hypertension. Details: Epidemiological research has found that high dietary intake of linolenic acid is associated with a reduced risk of hypertension in White adults. Most dietary linolenic acid is alpha-linolenic acid (only a small fraction is gamma-linolenic acid). Eating a diet high in linolenic acid seems to reduce the risk of hypertension by about 33% (12991). The effects of linolenic acid intake in other populations are unclear.
• Kidney transplant. Observational research suggests that alpha-linolenic acid is not beneficial after a kidney transplant, and may actually increase the risk of mortality. Details: Epidemiological research has found that dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid is not associated with improved graft function in kidney transplant. However, kidney transplant recipients in the highest tertile of alpha-linolenic acid intake appear to have a 2.2-fold increased risk of death from any cause when compared with those in the lowest tertile of dietary intake (98003). It is not clear whether this difference is specifically due to alpha-linolenic acid intake or to total fat intake.
• Migraine headache. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for migraine headache, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Multiple sclerosis. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for MS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if increased dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid affects all-cause mortality. Details: A large meta-analysis of prospective, observational studies has found that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid is associated with a 10% reduced risk of all-cause mortality when compared with low dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid. A dose-response analysis shows that a 1-gram increase in daily dietary intake is associated with a 5% reduction in overall mortality (106661). However, a meta-analysis of 250,000 individuals did not find an association between dietary alpha-linolenic acid intake and all-cause mortality (107741). The validity of this finding is limited by the use of dietary surveys to assess intake and the heterogeneity of the included studies.
• Prostate cancer. There is contradictory evidence about the role of alpha-linolenic acid in prostate cancer. Details: Some epidemiologic research suggests that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid is associated with an increased risk for prostate cancer (1337,2558,7823,7147,12978). Other research suggests high intake or serum levels of alpha-linolenic acid is not associated with increased levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) or the overall risk of prostate cancer (12961,15736,91402). However, it might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer (12961). The best evidence to date, which comes from a meta-analysis of five prospective population studies, suggests that increasing intake of alpha-linolenic acid by 0.5 grams daily is associated with a modest 1% reduction in the risk of prostate cancer. However, this analysis is dominated by a single study. A meta-analysis of results from nine prospective population studies suggests that a 0.1% increase in blood levels of alpha-linolenic acid is not associated with prostate cancer risk (90677). Reasons for the discrepancies are not entirely clear, but the source of alpha-linolenic acid appears to be important. Alpha-linolenic acid from dairy and meat sources has been positively associated with prostate cancer. Alpha-linolenic acid from plant sources, such as flaxseed, may not affect prostate cancer risk (12909).
• Pneumonia. It is unclear if dietary alpha-linolenic acid reduces the risk for pneumonia. Details: Epidemiological research has found that increasing dietary alpha-linolenic acid consumption is associated with a reduced risk of community-acquired pneumonia (13760).
• Psoriasis. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for psoriasis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Respiratory tract infections. It is unclear if oral alpha-linolenic acid is beneficial for reducing the incidence of respiratory tract infections in children. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children aged 3-4 years shows that taking alpha-linolenic acid 855 mg, in combination with linoleic acid 596 mg daily from November through February in 2 consecutive years, might reduce the number of recurrent respiratory infections when compared with placebo (10785).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if oral alpha-linolenic acid is beneficial in patients with RA. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking an alpha-linolenic acid-rich oil (flaxseed oil) for 3 months does not improve symptoms or laboratory parameters of RA when compared with baseline or with a linoleic acid-rich oil (safflower oil) (5898).
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for SLE, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition.
• Ulcerative colitis. Although there is interest in using oral alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) for ulcerative colitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ALA for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate alpha-linolenic acid for these uses.

(Read more about ALPHA-LINOLENIC ACID (ALA))

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Taking oral choline before exercise does not improve athletic performance. Details: Clinical research in trained athletes shows that taking oral choline 2.43 grams as a single dose does not delay fatigue during endurance sports when compared with placebo (5164). Other clinical research in untrained adults shows that taking oral choline 8.425 grams or 50 mg/kg once prior to participating in exhaustive, load-carrying exercise does not improve dexterity, upper or lower body strength, grip strength, or run time-to-exhaustion following exercise when compared with placebo (42229,42237).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial in patients with age-related cognitive decline. Details: Small clinical studies in adults with memory loss shows that taking choline 2 grams four times daily orally for 21 days does not improve memory when compared with placebo (5170). Observational research in adults over 60 years of age has found that intake of choline 187-399.5 mg daily is associated with a 33% to 42% reduced odds of low cognitive function when compared with intake of less than 187 mg daily. Intake of more than 399.5 mg daily was not associated with low cognitive function when compared with less than 187 mg daily (109100).
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial in patients with allergic rhinitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking oral choline, as tricholine citrate, 500 mg three times daily for 8 weeks is less effective than intranasal budesonide 200 mcg twice daily for reducing symptoms of allergic rhinitis (42252).
• Alzheimer disease. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for Alzheimer disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Asthma. Small clinical studies suggest that oral choline may modestly improve symptoms in patients with asthma. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking choline 500-1000 mg orally three times daily for 3-4 months decreases the severity of symptoms, the number of symptomatic days, and the need to use bronchodilators in patients with asthma when compared with placebo (5165,5166). Preliminary data also shows that choline 3 grams daily might be more effective than 1.5 grams daily (5165).
• Autism spectrum disorder. Oral choline has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of donepezil 2.5-5 mg daily and choline bitartrate 350 mg daily for 12 weeks improves receptive language skills, but no other outcomes, for up to 6 months after treatment when compared with placebo in children aged 5-10 years with autism spectrum disorder. Also, adolescents aged 11-16 years experienced no benefits, and some experienced an increase in behavioral symptoms, such as irritability (103571). It is unclear if this effect is due to choline, donepezil, or the combination.
• Breast Cancer. It is unclear if dietary intake of choline reduces the risk of breast cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 low to moderate-quality observational studies suggests that neither high nor low dietary intake of choline is associated with breast cancer risk. This finding is largely influenced by inclusion of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition (EPIC) cohort study, which analyzed data from over 300,000 subjects. However, subanalysis of 3 case-control studies suggests that high dietary intake of choline may be associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer when compared with low choline intake (111416). The interpretation of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies, self-reported data, and a small number of studies.
• Bronchitis. Although there has been interest in using oral and inhaled choline for bronchitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Cancer. It is unclear if dietary choline intake reduces the risk for cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of 11 low-quality population studies has found that high dietary intake of choline is associated with an 18% lower risk of cancer when compared with low choline intake. High dietary intake of both choline and betaine was associated with a 40% lower risk of cancer (97390).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if dietary choline intake reduces the risk of CVD or improves outcomes in patients with CVD. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that high intake of dietary choline is not associated with a lower risk of coronary artery disease, stroke, or mortality when compared with a diet low in choline (97388). A more recent population study has found that energy-adjusted total choline intake is not associated with the incidence of CVD over ten years. However, the highest intake of free choline is associated with a 34% reduced risk of CVD when compared with the lowest intake (109104).
• Cerebellar ataxia. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial in patients with cerebellar ataxia. Details: Despite some anecdotal reports suggesting that taking choline improves motor function, preliminary clinical research shows that taking choline 4-5 grams orally daily for 4 days to 6 weeks does not reduce cerebellar ataxia (5161,5173,23679).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial for improving cognitive function in healthy adults. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of choline 50 mg/kg orally prior to participating in an exhaustive, load-carrying task does not improve reaction time, reasoning, memory, or serial addition and subtraction ability following the task when compared with placebo (42237). Also, preliminary clinical research in patients requiring long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN) shows that adding choline chloride 2 grams daily to TPN for 24 weeks might improve delayed visual memory, but does not improve other measures of cognitive performance, when compared with TPN alone (42232).
• Cirrhosis. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for cirrhosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Complex partial seizures. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for complex partial seizures, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Dementia. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for dementia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of depression. Details: Observational research has found that dietary choline intake of at least 198 mg daily is associated with a 32% to 43% decreased risk of depressive symptoms when compared with intakes of less than 198 mg daily (109106). It is unclear if choline supplementation is beneficial for depression.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of type 2 diabetes; the available research is conflicting. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking oral choline bitartrate 1000 mg daily for 2 months does not affect coagulation parameters or levels of triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes (103569). Choline has also been evaluated for the prevention of type 2 diabetes. In Finnish males, observational research has found that dietary intake of total choline at levels of more than 482 mg daily, especially as phosphatidylcholine, is associated with a 25% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes over the following 19.3 years when compared with intakes of less than 382 mg daily (103567). However, in males and females in the US, additional observational research has found no association between dietary choline and risk of type 2 diabetes over a mean of 9 years (103570). In addition, a sub-analysis found that the highest intakes of choline (a median of 487 mg daily) were associated with a 54% higher risk of type 2 diabetes among females, but not males, when compared with the lowest intakes (a median of 175 mg daily) (103570). Population research in patients with diabetes has found that an intake of dietary choline in amounts of at least 279 mg daily is associated with a 2.1-fold increased odds of diabetic retinopathy in females, but not males, when compared with an intake less than 206 mg daily (109102). It is unclear if choline itself is responsible for the increased odds of diabetic retinopathy in this population.
• Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). It is unclear if oral choline improves cognition in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). Details: Clinical research in children aged 2.5-5 years with FASD shows that taking oral choline bitartrate, providing choline 500 mg, daily for 9 months does not improve global cognitive development or hippocampal-dependent memory when compared with placebo. However, a subgroup analysis of only children aged 2.5-4 years suggests that choline may improve hippocampal-dependent memory (92112). Follow-up of this study at 7 years shows that choline improves motor speed and suggests a trend towards improved color naming, which are components of executive functioning testing, when compared with placebo (111745). The validity of these findings is limited by the high rate of patient discontinuation which limits statistical power. A small clinical trial in children 5-10 years old with FASD shows that taking oral glycerophosphocholine, providing choline 625 mg, daily for 6 weeks does not improve cognitive function, executive function, attention, or hyperactivity when compared with placebo (97389).
• Hepatitis. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for hepatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Huntington disease. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for Huntington disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of hypertension. Details: Population research has found that every 100-mg increase in daily dietary choline intake is associated with a 15% decreased risk of developing hypertension over the next 4.6 to 9.1 years (109098). However, it is unclear if any benefits are specifically related to dietary choline or whether choline supplementation is beneficial.
• Infant development. It is unclear if oral choline intake during pregnancy is beneficial for infant development; the available research is conflicting. Details: Two observational studies have found that higher intake of choline during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy is associated with improvement in offspring cognitive development and visual memory at the age of 18 months and 7 years, respectively, when compared with lower choline intake (94654,94657). One of these studies found that each 1 mcmol/L increase in maternal blood levels of choline at 16 weeks' gestation was associated with a 2.23-point increase in cognitive skill score based on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-III) at 18 months of age (94657). Also, some observational research has found that higher plasma levels of choline during pregnancy are associated with higher processing speed and decreased social withdrawal at 4 years of age in the offspring (109101). In contrast, 3 observational studies have found that higher intake of choline during pregnancy, as well as higher maternal and cord blood levels of choline, are not associated with improved offspring intelligence at 5 years of age or cognitive performance at 3 or 7 years of age (94654,94655,94656). However, many of these observational studies, including those with positive findings, included populations with a mean intake of choline that was below the recommended adequate intake of 450 mg daily (94654,94656). It's possible that higher intake of choline is needed to observe a benefit; however, research on the effects of choline supplementation is limited. One small clinical trial shows that taking choline 930 mg daily during the third trimester modestly improves sustained attention in the child at 7 years of age when compared with taking 480 mg daily (109105).
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial in patients with metabolic syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with metabolic syndrome shows that taking oral choline 400 mg daily for 4 weeks does not decrease body weight, blood pressure, plasma glucose levels, or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, or increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, when compared with baseline (105731).
• Neural tube birth defects. It is unclear if oral choline intake is beneficial for preventing neural tube defects. Details: Population research has found that females who have a high dietary choline intake around the time of conception have a lower risk of having offspring with a neural tube defect when compared to those with lower intake (13134).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Details: A cross-sectional analysis of results from observational and clinical research shows that low dietary intake of choline is associated with increased fibrosis in postmenopausal adults with NAFLD, but not in children, males, or premenopausal adults with NAFLD. Dietary choline intake was not associated with steatosis severity in any patient subgroup (92109).
• Schizophrenia. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for schizophrenia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Tourette syndrome. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for Tourette syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• TPN-associated hepatic steatosis. It is unclear if intravenous choline is beneficial in patients with TPN-associated hepatic steatosis. Details: In patients receiving long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN), plasma levels of choline can decrease. Small, low-quality clinical studies show that administering intravenous choline 1-4 grams daily for 24 weeks improves some markers of TPN-associated hepatic steatosis when compared with baseline or placebo (5174,42235). More evidence is needed to rate choline for these uses.

(Read more about CHOLINE)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Metabolic syndrome. Oral inositol seems to modestly improve lipid parameters, blood pressure, and insulin resistance in patients with metabolic syndrome. Details: Some clinical research in postmenopausal adults with metabolic syndrome following a low-calorie diet shows that taking myo-inositol 2 grams twice daily for one year reduces total cholesterol by 29 mg/dL, triglycerides by 64 mg/dL, systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 9 mmHg and 6 mmHg, respectively, increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by 6 mg/dL, and improves insulin resistance when compared with placebo. It did not reduce body mass index or waist circumference in these patients (91554). A meta-analysis of clinical studies in a mixed population shows similar effects on blood pressure, especially among postmenopausal adults with metabolic syndrome, at durations exceeding 8 weeks, and at doses of at least 4 grams (108820). Another clinical study in postmenopausal adults with metabolic syndrome and at risk for breast cancer shows that taking a combination of inositol and alpha-lipoic acid daily for 6 months, in combination with a low-calorie diet, reduces insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) by at least 20% when compared with a low-calorie diet alone. Also, taking inositol and alpha-lipoic acid seems to increase HDL cholesterol by about 6% and reduce triglycerides by 5% when compared to baseline (91543). It is unclear if these effects are due to inositol, alpha-lipoic acid, or the combination.
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Oral inositol, often in combination with folic acid, seems to improve some glycemic, lipid, metabolic, hormonal, and reproductive parameters in patients with PCOS. However, research is conflicting. Details: Oral inositol, most frequently in the forms of myo-inositol or D-chiro-inositol, has been evaluated for efficacy in a wide range of outcomes associated with PCOS including reproductive and pregnancy outcomes, metabolic parameters, and anthropomorphic measures. Often, inositol is taken in combination with folic acid or metformin. Inositol has been investigated for its effect on metabolic parameters that are often altered in PCOS. A meta-analysis of 9 studies in patients with PCOS shows that taking myo-inositol or D-chiro-inositol with or without folic acid marginally decreases body mass index (BMI) by about 0.5 kg/m2 when compared with placebo (111670). Inositol has also been evaluated for its effect on glucose metabolism in adults with PCOS. Meta-analyses of about 10 studies show that taking myo-inositol or D-chiro-inositol with or without folic acid reduces fasting plasma glucose by 1-4 mg/dL (98944,111670). However, evidence is conflicting on the effect of inositol on insulin levels and measures of insulin resistance (98944,111670). Additionally, most studies show that inositol does not improve measures of glucose metabolism more than metformin. The effect of inositol on lipid profiles has also been studied. A meta-analysis of 2 clinical studies and other small clinical studies show that taking inositol as D-chiro-inositol with or without folic acid modestly reduces total cholesterol and triglycerides when compared with control (2028,98944,91552). Some studies have also investigated the effect of inositol on hormone levels. Meta-analyses show that inositol modulates androgen levels as shown by reduced total and free testosterone, androstenedione, and increased sex-hormone binding globulin when compared with placebo. (2028,91552,98944,111670). The validity of these effects is limited by high heterogeneity in terms of inclusion and exclusion criteria, dose, and treatment duration within the included studies. Myo-inositol has also been compared with metformin in some clinical research, with some evidence of benefit (95085,95086). Meta-analyses of small clinical studies show that taking myo-inositol 2-4 grams daily, with or without folic acid, for 12-24 weeks does not improve fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), BMI, waist-hip circumference, or androgen levels when compared with metformin 1.5-2.5 grams daily (100705,108823,111670,111670). However, inositol seems to have a lower risk of adverse effects than metformin. These analyses are limited due to the small size, methodological issues, and high heterogeneity of the included studies. In combination with metformin, small clinical studies show that taking metformin, myo-inositol 550 mg, and D-chiro-inositol 150 mg twice daily is associated with improved lipid parameters and postprandial insulin levels when compared with metformin alone (108822). Meta-analyses and clinical studies have investigated the effect of inositol on ovulation, reproduction, and pregnancy outcomes. Some research suggests that inositol increases ovulation rate, promotes cycle normalization, and improves ovarian function in patients with PCOS (2028,91552,98944,111670). A small clinical study shows that taking myo-inositol 4 grams and folic acid 400 mcg (Inofolic, Lo.Li.Pharma) daily for three spontaneous cycles induces ovulation in about 62% of individuals with anovulatory PCOS and insulin resistance. Adding clomiphene citrate with myo-inositol induces ovulation in about 72% of the patients who remain anovulatory after treatment with myo-inositol alone (91547). Another clinical study shows that taking a combination of inositol 2 grams, folic acid 200 mcg, and N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg (Ovaric HP, Just Pharma) twice daily for 12 months improves ovulation rates in PCOS patients with oligomenorrhea, regardless of insulin sensitivity at baseline (91553). Despite evidence that inositol improves ovulation rates, it does not appear to impact pregnancy rates (111670). Some research has also investigated the effects of taking both isomers of inositol concomitantly. Taking myo-inositol 550 mg plus D-chiro-inositol 13.8 mg (Inofolic Combi, Lo.Li.Pharma) twice daily, beginning 12 weeks before ovarian hyperstimulation and continuing throughout pregnancy, improves oocyte quality when compared to treatment with D-chiro-inositol alone. The combination appears to increase fertilization rate in patients aged 35 years or younger, but not those older than 35 years (91544). Other clinical research shows that taking myo-inositol 550 mg and D-chiro-inositol 150 mg twice daily for 12 weeks improves pregnancy rates and live birth rates by an additional 10% and 11%, respectively, when compared with myo-inositol 550 mg plus D-chiro-inositol 13.8 mg. The higher-dose combination also resulted in a 15% lower rate of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome when compared with those taking the lower dose of D-chiro-inositol (102317). Lastly, other research shows that taking myo-inositol and D-chiro-inositol together may improve metabolic parameters faster than taking myo-inositol alone (91550). Research has also evaluated the effects of inositol on other pertinent clinical outcomes in PCOS. Several small clinical studies show that taking the combination of myo-inositol and D-chiro-inositol, alone or in combination with metformin, improves menstrual cycle irregularity when compared with metformin alone, but not as much as a taking a combined hormonal contraceptive (108822,108824). The validity of these findings is limited by the unblinded nature of the studies. Also, a small clinical study shows that taking metformin with myo-inositol 550 mg and D-chiro-inositol 150 mg twice daily is associated with improved acne, but not hirsutism, at 6 months, when compared with metformin alone (108822). The validity of these findings is limited by the unblinded nature of the study. More research is needed to clarify the effect of inositol on anthropometric, metabolic, and endocrine outcomes in patients with PCOS.
• Preterm labor. Oral inositol in combination with folic acid seems to prevent preterm labor in individuals at risk for gestational diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of five clinical trials in individuals at risk for gestational diabetes shows that taking myo-inositol plus folic acid daily, beginning during the first trimester and continuing throughout pregnancy, decreases the risk of preterm delivery by 64% when compared with folic acid alone. Patients in all but one study included in this analysis took myo-inositol 2 grams plus folic acid 200 mcg twice daily, while patients in the other study took myo-inositol 1100 mg plus D-chiro-inositol 27.6 mg and folic acid 400 mcg daily (100706). It's unclear if these results are generalizable to individuals with a low risk for gestational diabetes.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Oral or intravenous inositol does not seem to prevent ARDS in preterm infants and may be associated with worsened outcomes. Details: Historically, small clinical trials in infants with or at risk for ARDS have suggested that myo-inositol, given parenterally and enterally for 5-10 days, might improve survival and reduce the risk of death and serious complications (2191,2192,91546). However, a large, high-quality clinical study in infants born at less than 28 weeks' gestation at risk for ARDS shows that myo-inositol 40 mg/kg given intravenously and then enterally every 12 hours for up to 70 days does not reduce the risk of death or retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). In fact, the rate of death or type 1 ROP increased by 7% in the myo-inositol group when compared to the control group, and a higher incidence of adverse events in the myo-inositol group, including poor perfusion, hypotension, and infections, led to early trial discontinuation (98946). Long-term follow-up until 24 months corrected age confirms that the initial increase in mortality rate in the myo-inositol group remained stable; however, there was no difference in a composite outcome of death or survival with moderate or severe neurodevelopmental impairment, as well as no difference in the risk of ROP, between the treatment and control groups (108819). The most recent meta-analysis, which incorporates this large clinical study, concludes that inositol supplementation does not reduce the risk of death in infants at risk for ARDS (102319).
• Anxiety. Oral inositol does not seem to be beneficial for patients with anxiety. Details: A meta-analysis of four clinical trials shows that taking inositol orally does not improve anxiety severity in patients with anxiety disorders, including obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, or post-traumatic stress disorder, when compared with placebo (91549).
• Depression. Oral inositol does not seem to be beneficial for patients with depression. Details: Guidelines from the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that inositol in doses up to 12 grams daily is not currently recommended as monotherapy or adjunctive use for major depressive disorder due to a lack of evidence for efficacy (110318). Additionally, a meta-analysis of seven clinical trials shows that inositol does not significantly improve symptoms of depression in patients with bipolar depression, major depressive disorder, or premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) (91549). While limited research shows that patients receiving inositol for 4 weeks may improve, patients initially responding to inositol seem to relapse rapidly upon discontinuation of treatment (2026,2185). Additionally, taking inositol with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) doesn't appear to improve the effectiveness of SSRI therapy or improve depression in SSRI treatment failures (2025,10851).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Oral inositol does not seem to be beneficial for patients with diabetic neuropathy. Details: Most preliminary clinical research shows that taking inositol orally doesn't improve the symptoms of diabetic neuropathy (2193,2194,2195).
• Retinopathy of prematurity. Oral or intravenous inositol does not seem to prevent retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in preterm infants. Details: A meta-analysis of six clinical trials shows that myo-inositol, given parenterally and/or enterally, does not seem to reduce the risk of ROP when compared with placebo in preterm infants (100704). A large, high-quality clinical study included in this meta-analysis shows that myo-inositol 40 mg/kg given intravenously and then enterally every 12 hours for up to 70 days does not reduce the risk of death or ROP in infants born at less than 28 weeks' gestation. In fact, the rate of death or type 1 ROP increased by 7% in the myo-inositol group when compared with placebo and a higher incidence of adverse events in the myo-inositol group, including poor perfusion, hypotension, and infections, led to early trial discontinuation (98946). Long-term follow-up until 24 months corrected age confirms that the initial increase in mortality rate in the myo-inositol group remained stable; however, there was no difference in a composite outcome of death or survival with moderate or severe neurodevelopmental impairment, as well as no difference in the risk of ROP, between the treatment and control groups (108819).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related testosterone deficiency. It is unclear if oral D-chiro-inositol is beneficial in patients with age-related testosterone deficiency. Details: A very small clinical study in males aged 65-75 years with low-normal morning testosterone levels and signs and symptoms of androgen deficiency shows that taking D-chiro-inositol 600 mg twice daily for 30 days improves sexual function and physical strength when compared with baseline (108821). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral inositol is beneficial in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: Evidence is conflicting on whether inositol helps treat bipolar disorder in children. One very small preliminary study in children aged 5-12 years with bipolar disorder not on concomitant mood-stabilizing medications shows that taking inositol 80 mg/kg (maximum 2 grams) daily for 12 weeks reduces manic symptoms when compared to baseline. Additionally, taking a combination of inositol 80 mg/kg and high eicosapentaenoic acid omega-3 fatty acid capsules (EPA; Nordic Naturals) 1650-3000 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces manic and depressive symptoms when compared to baseline (95092). However, another more recent study with the same intervention and protocol shows that the combination of inositol and high eicosapentaenoic acid omega-3 fatty acid reduces symptoms of depression, but does not improve manic symptoms, when compared with either ingredient taken alone (111676).
• Chemotherapy-induced leukopenia. Oral inositol has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults undergoing breast cancer surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy shows that taking inositol orally 390 mg twice daily and applying IP-6 gel 4% twice daily to the surgical site, starting 2 weeks before adjuvant chemotherapy and stopping 2 weeks after the last cycle, attenuates reductions in white and red blood cell counts when compared with no intervention. Using inositol and IP-6 also improves breast and arm symptom scores and some quality of life scores; however, these improvements were not consistent over time.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral inositol is beneficial for the treatment of type 1 diabetes or the prevention of gestational diabetes. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with type 1 diabetes and a body mass index of at least 25 kg/m2 shows that taking a specific combination product containing D-chiro-inositol and folic acid (Chirofol 500, LJ Pharma) daily for 6 months, along with insulin therapy, decreases glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by approximately 0.5% when compared to taking folic acid alone with insulin therapy. However, there was no difference between groups with respect to insulin resistance or body mass index (95088). Most research shows that taking inositol during pregnancy prevents gestational diabetes. However, most studies conducted to date are of low quality and it is unclear if the results are generalizable. Meta-analyses of 4-7 clinical studies in pregnant adults, some with overweight and obesity, shows that taking myo-inositol 200-4000 mg daily may reduce the risk of gestational diabetes and gestational hypertension, improve 1- and 2-hour glucose tolerance test results, and reduce insulin requirements. Inositol may also be associated with improved infant outcomes such as increased gestational age at birth and reduced preterm delivery but does not seem to influence birth weight, NICU admission rate, neonatal hypoglycemia, the incidence of shoulder dystocia, macrosomia or cesarian delivery when compared with control (111664,111667,111671,111677). The validity of these effects is limited by significant heterogeneity within the included studies, concerns about blinding, and overall low-quality evidence. Most clinical research shows that taking myo-inositol 2 grams plus folic acid 200 mcg twice daily (usually as Inofolic, Lo.Li. Pharma International), beginning during the first trimester and continuing throughout pregnancy, decreases the incidence of gestational diabetes by 57% to 92% when compared with folic acid alone in patients at risk for gestational diabetes. Myo-inositol seems to be more effective than D-chiro-inositol (91545,91548,95083,95084,100706,103750,104688). However, supplementation with lower doses of inositol, mimicking natural inositol occurring in the body, may not be effective. Other evidence is conflicting about whether inositol prevents gestational diabetes. One clinical study shows that taking a combination of myo-inositol 1.1 grams, D-chiro-inositol 27.6 mg, and folic acid 400 mcg (Inofolic Combi, Lo.Li. Pharma International) daily during pregnancy does not decrease the incidence of gestational diabetes when compared with folic acid alone in patients with a family history of diabetes (95082,103750). In patients eventually diagnosed with gestational diabetes, one small clinical study shows that taking myo-inositol 2 grams reduces the number of patients requiring insulin by at least 50% (104688), although another small clinical study shows that adding D-chiro-inositol, myo-inositol, or both to folic acid does not affect insulin resistance when compared with placebo (98945).
• Dyslipidemia. Although there has been interest in using oral inositol for hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of inositol for these conditions.
• Hypertension. Although there has been interest in using oral inositol for hypertension, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of inositol for this condition.
• Hypothyroidism. It is unclear if oral inositol is beneficial for subclinical hypothyroidism. Details: Clinical research in females aged 18 to 50 years with or at risk for subclinical hypothyroidism in Slovakia shows that taking myo-inositol 600 mg and selenium 83 mcg daily for 6 months modestly reduces thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroid auto-antibody titers when compared to baseline. Myo-inositol and selenium supplementation also reduces patient-reported hypothyroid symptoms including fatigue, menstrual cycle irregularity, and intolerance to heat or cold (110591). The interpretation of these results is limited by the lack of a control group. In addition, it is unclear if these effects are due to myo-inositol, selenium, or the combination.
• Infertility. It is unclear if oral inositol is beneficial in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) or in vitro fertilization (IVF). Details: Several small studies in patients undergoing ICSI show that taking a specific combination product containing myo-inositol 4 grams and folic acid 400 mcg (Inofolic, Lo.Li. Pharma International S.r.l) daily, starting 1-3 months before ICSI and continuing until ovulation, improves fertilization rate, but does not improve implantation or pregnancy rates, when compared with taking folic acid alone (103752,108825). However, another moderate-sized clinical study in adults with infertility undergoing ICSI and IVF shows that taking the same combination of myo-inositol 4000 mg and folic acid 400 mcg daily for 2 months starting on the third day of the cycle improves mean number of oocytes, meiosis II oocytes, 2 pronuclear embryos, and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates when compared with taking folic acid alone (111672). The effects of inositol on fertility have been studied in patients with specific comorbidities. A case-control study in long-term survivors of lymphoma suggests that taking myo-inositol 400 mg and D-chiro-inositol 45 mg (Ovofert Fast, CRL Pharma) three times daily for 12 months is associated with reductions in follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), dyspareunia, and dysmenorrhea and a modest increase in antral follicle count of the right ovary when compared with control (111673). The validity of these effects is limited by a lack of blinding. Inositol has also been evaluated in females with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). A meta-analysis of clinical studies in adults with PCOS undergoing IVF or ICSI shows that inositol does not improve pregnancy rates when compared to no treatment. However, inositol may increase clinical pregnancy rates when compared with metformin (111675). Inositol has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A large clinical study in females planning to conceive shows that taking a combination product containing myo-inositol 4 grams, vitamin D, riboflavin, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, zinc, and probiotics does not improve time-to-conception, clinical pregnancy rates, or live birth rates when compared with a standard micronutrient supplement. However, the supplement shortens time-to-conception in adults with overweight to durations equivalent to patients who are not overweight, but lengthens time to conception in adults with obesity when compared with placebo (111665). It is unclear whether these effects are due to inositol, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Insomnia. It is unclear if oral inositol is beneficial for improving sleep during pregnancy. Details: Clinical research shows that taking myo-inositol 2 grams plus folic acid 200 mcg (Inofolic, Lo.Li. Pharma International) before bed for 10 weeks, starting at 14 weeks gestation, improves overall measures of sleep quality by a small amount when compared with folic acid alone. However, this improvement was not maintained until 37-38 weeks' gestation. Also, the study was not limited to patients with poor sleep quality during pregnancy, but to any healthy pregnant individual (104687).
• Lithium-induced side effects. It is unclear if oral inositol is beneficial for reducing lithium-induced side effects. Details: A small clinical study suggests that taking inositol 6 grams daily for 10 weeks may improve psoriasis associated with lithium therapy when compared with baseline (11972). However, taking inositol orally does not seem to improve other lithium-induced adverse effects, such as tremor, thirst, and changes in thyroid and adrenal function (2027).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral inositol is beneficial for slowing the rate of bronchial dysplasia. Details: Preliminary clinical research in smokers with bronchial dysplasia considered at high risk for lung cancer shows that taking myo-inositol (Tsuno Food Industries Co., Ltd.) 9 grams orally once daily for 2 weeks then twice daily for 6 months, does not increase the rate of complete or partial response when compared with placebo (95090).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral inositol is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: A small clinical study in adults with NAFLD and obesity shows that taking myo-inositol powder 4 grams daily for 8 weeks does not improve liver health markers, such as liver function test levels or liver steatosis, but does improve some components of lipid profiles, glycemic indices, and anthropometric measures when compared to baseline (111304) However, this study may have been inadequately powered to detect differences in some of the outcomes.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral inositol is beneficial in patients with overweight or obesity. Details: A meta-analysis of 15 clinical studies in adults shows that taking inositol 600-4450 mg daily for 6-48 weeks decreases body mass index (BMI) by about 0.4 kg/m2. Subgroup analysis suggests that myo-inositol may be beneficial at a dosage less than 1000 mg for less than 12 weeks, especially in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and overweight or obesity, with higher baseline BMI, and above 40 years of age (111666). However, the validity of this finding is limited by significant heterogeneity in the included studies.
• Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). It is unclear if oral inositol is beneficial in patients with OCD. Details: One preliminary clinical study in adults with OCD shows that taking inositol 18 grams daily for 6 weeks improves Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale scores when compared with placebo (2186). However, taking inositol does not seem to improve the severity or type of OCD symptoms in patients already taking a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (91556). Both of these studies were small, and treatment was administered for only 6 weeks.
• Panic disorder. Oral inositol seems to improve symptoms of panic disorder. Details: A very small clinical study shows that taking inositol 12 grams daily reduces the severity and rate of panic attacks and the severity of agoraphobia over 4 weeks of treatment when compared with placebo (2184). Another very small clinical study shows that taking inositol 18 grams daily for one month may be as effective as fluvoxamine 150 mg daily for treatment of panic disorder (10387). However, the one-month duration may not have provided adequate time to see the full effects of fluvoxamine.
• Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It is unclear if oral inositol is beneficial in patients with PTSD. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking inositol 12 grams daily for 4 weeks does not improve distress when compared with placebo in patients with PTSD (91557).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral inositol is beneficial for preventing hypertension during pregnancy. Details: In patients with a body mass index (BMI) between 25-29.9 kg/m2, preliminary clinical research shows that taking myo-inositol 2 grams plus folic acid 200 mcg (Inofolic, Lo.Li. Pharma International) twice daily, beginning during the first trimester and continuing throughout pregnancy, decreases the incidence of pregnancy-induced hypertension by 66% when compared with folic acid alone (104688).
• Psoriasis. It is unclear if oral or topical inositol is beneficial for improving symptoms of psoriasis. Details: One small clinical study shows that taking inositol 6 grams daily for 10 weeks does not improve symptoms of psoriasis in a small group of patients when compared to baseline. However, taking this dose of inositol has a moderate effect on overall symptoms in patients with psoriasis related to lithium use (11972). Preliminary clinical research also shows that topical use of D-chiro-inositol is unlikely to be beneficial for reducing overall symptoms of psoriasis. Topical application of inositol 0.25% or 1% for 6 weeks improves overall symptoms when compared with baseline. However, the inositol-containing creams were no more effective than the control cream (104686). Inositol has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small prospective observational study in adults with mild plaque psoriasis suggests that applying amino-inositol and urea 40% cream (Inosit U40, Biogena) 1-2 times daily for 4 weeks is associated with reductions in the severity and extent of psoriasis symptoms and improvements in quality of life measures when compared to baseline (111668). The validity of these effects is limited by a small sample size, a lack of a comparator group, insufficient blinding, and the observational study design.
• Trichotillomania. It is unclear if oral inositol is beneficial for reducing hair pulling. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking inositol in doses ranging from 6-18 grams daily over a period of 10 weeks is no more effective than placebo in reducing subjective or clinician-documented symptoms of hair pulling in patients with trichotillomania (95089). More evidence is needed to rate inositol for these uses.

(Read more about INOSITOL)

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Alzheimer disease. Lecithin does not improve daily functioning in patients with Alzheimer disease. Details: In patients with Alzheimer disease, taking various types of lecithin, 1.2-45 grams daily for up to 6 months, alone or in combination with various conventional medications, does not improve cognitive function or other measures of disease progression (5149,5151,5152,5156,14817,14823,14825,14837,14838).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral lecithin can slow age-related cognitive decline. Details: A small clinical crossover study in healthy adults aged 64 years and older shows that taking lecithin 26 grams orally daily, alone or in combination with physostigmine, for 5 weeks does not seem to improve memory when compared with placebo (19204).
• Anxiety. Although there is interest in using oral lecithin for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lecithin for this condition.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Although there is interest in using oral lecithin for atopic dermatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lecithin for this condition.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A clinical study in six patients with mania shows that taking lecithin 10 mg three times daily improves symptoms of delusions, incoherent speech, and hallucinations when compared with placebo (14839).
• Dry skin. Although there is interest in using topical lecithin for dry skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lecithin for this condition.
• Friedreich ataxia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral lecithin is not beneficial in people with Friedreich ataxia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking lecithin 25 grams orally daily for 1 month does not have any benefit in people with Friedreich ataxia (59298). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking lecithin for a longer period of 6 months also does not improve performance (19211).
• Hyperlipidemia. Although lecithin may lower cholesterol in healthy people, it does not seem to improve cholesterol levels in people with hyperlipidemia. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking lecithin 20-30 grams daily for up to 11 months decreases cholesterol in healthy people (5147,14820). However, other clinical research shows that lecithin has no effect on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or total cholesterol levels in people with hyperlipidemia (5148,14820).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial in patients with Parkinson disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with Parkinson disease shows that taking lecithin 32 grams daily for 8 weeks does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (19212).
• Postoperative pain. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial for reducing postoperative pain. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking lecithin 20 grams prior to surgery increases choline levels, but does not reduce postoperative pain after gynecological surgery, when compared with placebo (91231).
• Tardive dyskinesia. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial in patients with tardive dyskinesia. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with tardive dyskinesia shows that taking lecithin orally for 2 months, alone or in combination with lithium, does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (14822,14824).
• TPN-associated hepatic steatosis. It is unclear if oral lecithin is beneficial in patients with hepatic steatosis associated with long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Details: A small clinical study in patients on long-term TPN with low choline levels suggests that taking lecithin 20 grams orally twice daily for 6 weeks reduces the degree of hepatic steatosis, compared with no significant changes in those taking placebo (5140).
• Ulcerative colitis. Oral lecithin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a disease-specific medical food (Profermin, Nordisk Rebalance) containing lecithin, fermented oats, barley malt, and lactobacillus plantarum, as 250 mL twice daily for 24 weeks, decreases disease activity by over 56% when compared with baseline and leads to remission in 46% of patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (91228). Other preliminary clinical research in this population shows that taking Profermin 250 mL twice daily for 8 weeks improves disease activity and remission rate when compared with another medical food (Fresubin Original, Fresenius Kabi) (90271). The effects of lecithin alone are unclear. More evidence is needed to rate lecithin for these uses.

(Read more about LECITHIN)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Coronary heart disease (CHD). Supporting, but not conclusive, evidence suggests that consuming fats and oils rich in oleic acid might reduce the risk of CHD (26466,95745,98563,101821). However, the relationship between blood levels of oleic acid and risk of CHD or CVD is unclear (101832,101834,101838). In 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that it would allow a qualified health claim stating that replacing dietary fats and oils higher in saturated fat with oils containing at least 70% oleic acid may reduce the risk of CHD. To achieve this benefit, high-oleic acid containing oils should not increase total daily energy intake. The suggested daily dietary intake is about 20 grams (1.5 tablespoons) of high oleic acid oils in place of other fats and oils. These oils include olive oil, high-oleic acid sunflower oil, and high-oleic acid canola oil (98563). A meta-analysis of clinical studies shows that replacing 7.5% of energy from partially hydrogenated vegetable oils with high oleic acid sunflower oil can reduce coronary heart disease risk by about 9% to 19%. Furthermore, analysis of results from observational studies found that replacing partially hydrogenated oil with high oleic acid sunflower oil is associated with a 16% to 35% reduction in the risk of coronary heart disease events (95745). Clinical research in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk shows that taking high-oleic acid canola oil 60 grams per 3000 kcal of energy daily as part of a fixed composition diet for 4-6 weeks reduces the Framingham 10-year coronary heart disease risk scores by 6.8% compared to baseline (26466,101821). However, taking the high-oleic acid canola oil is no more effective than regular canola oil, which contains approximately 62% oleic acid (26466,101821). The relationship between blood levels of oleic acid and risk of CHD or CVD is unclear. While some population research has found that having the highest blood levels of oleic acid is associated with an increased risk of CVD when compared to having the lowest blood levels of oleic acid, other research suggests an inverse association or no association at all (101832,101834,101838). One study has found that having the highest blood levels of oleic acid is associated with a 1.4- to 2-fold increased risk of heart failure, other cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality (101832). In contrast, another found that the highest blood levels of oleic acid is associated with a 73% reduced risk of having a stroke (101838). A third study found no association at all between plasma levels of oleic acid and risk of heart failure (101834). The clinical significance of these findings is unclear, and results should not necessarily be extrapolated to dietary oleic acid (101832). While plasma oleic acid levels seem to be a weak indirect marker of moderate to high olive oil use, it is also a weak marker of intake of butter and avian fats (101838). Furthermore, there is no clear evidence that plasma levels of oleic acid directly correlate with dietary oleic acid, especially where dietary oleic acid intake is relatively low (101832). As a non-essential fatty acid, oleic acid is endogenously synthesized in the liver from saturated fats (101832,101834,101838).
• Hypercholesterolemia. Evidence from small studies shows that consuming oils rich in oleic acid as part of the diet in place of other dietary fats may improve cholesterol levels (21698,26466,67569,101821). Preliminary clinical research in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that consuming oleic acid as part of a high oleic sunflower oil- or high oleic canola oil-rich diet for 3-4 weeks decreases total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by a moderate amount when compared with diets rich in palm oil, medium-chain triglycerides, or a blend of fats found in a regular Western diet (21698,67569). Other clinical research in patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor shows that consuming oleic acid as part of high oleic acid canola oil for up to 4 weeks reduces total cholesterol by up to 9.4% and LDL cholesterol by up to 12.5% compared to baseline or a diet higher in saturated fats. However, taking the high oleic acid canola oil is no more effective than regular canola oil, also a source of oleic acid (26466,101821).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bladder cancer. Population research has found that the highest blood levels of oleic acid are associated with a 46% decreased risk of having bladder cancer when compared to the lowest blood levels (101844). However, plasma oleic acid levels are only a weak indirect marker of dietary intake of oleic acid. As a non-essential fatty acid, oleic acid is endogenously synthesized in the liver from saturated fats (101832,101834,101838). The effect of oleic acid supplementation on bladder cancer risk is unknown.
• Breast cancer. Population research has found no association between dietary fatty acid intake, including oleic acid, and the risk of breast cancer (96528). The effect of oleic acid supplementation on breast cancer risk is unknown.
• Depression. An observational study in perimenopausal patients aged 42-52 years has found that increasing dietary intake of oleic acid is associated with an increase in depression symptom scores. The odds ratio for depressive symptoms was approximately 2-fold higher for the highest quartile of oleic acid intake when compared with the lowest quartile (108924).
• Diabetes. A small clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking oleic acid as part of a low-fat diet containing 15% monounsaturated fatty acids for 3 weeks does not alter levels of total or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or the change in LDL oxidation when compared with taking linoleic acid as part of a low-fat diet containing 15% polyunsaturated fatty acids (101847).
• Diarrhea. Preliminary clinical research in patients with chronic diarrhea shows that taking oleic acid 1.6 or 3.2 mL before a meal reduces bowel movements over the next 24 hours by approximately 22% compared with taking no oleic acid. Intestinal transit time was also increased by 28 and 54 minutes, respectively (101848). Since the specific cause of chronic diarrhea differed among the patients included in this study, it is unclear if oleic acid is beneficial for most or only certain forms of chronic diarrhea.
• Hypertension. Preliminary clinical research in patients with central obesity and at least one other cardiovascular disease risk factor shows that taking oleic acid as high oleic acid canola oil for 4 weeks does not reduce systolic or diastolic blood pressure compared to baseline (26466).
• Obesity. Preliminary clinical research in patients with central obesity shows that taking oleic acid as high oleic acid canola oil for 4 weeks reduces abdominal fat mass by approximately 0.1 kg compared to baseline (98564). Other preliminary clinical research in patients with central adiposity and at least one other risk factor of cardiovascular disease shows that taking high oleic acid canola oil for 6 weeks reduces total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 3.4% and 5.6%, respectively, compared with a control oil lower in monounsaturated fats and higher in saturated fats (101821). However, in these studies, taking the high oleic acid canola oil is no more effective than regular canola oil, also a source of oleic acid (98564,101821). Any effect of oleic acid itself is unclear.
• Pancreatic cancer. The association between dietary oleic acid and pancreatic cancer risk is unclear. Most population research shows no association between dietary oleic acid and pancreatic cancer risk. However, one large population study has found that the highest intake of oleic acid, at least 23.7 grams daily, is associated with a 71% decreased risk of pancreatic cancer when compared with the lowest intake. The benefit is only observed in overweight or obese individuals. (101833). The effect of oleic acid supplementation on pancreatic cancer risk is unknown.
• Short bowel syndrome. A small preliminary clinical trial in patients with surgical short bowel syndrome of at least 2 years shows that taking oleic acid 3.2 mL in 50 mL of a beverage daily for 3 months does not reduce intestinal transit time or diarrhea, or improve body weight, when compared with placebo. In addition, energy absorption was reduced by 14% (101843).
• Stroke. Population research has found that highest blood levels of oleic acid are associated with a 73% reduced risk of stroke when compared with lowest blood levels of oleic acid (101838). However, plasma oleic acid levels are only a weak indirect marker of dietary oleic acid. As a non-essential fatty acid, oleic acid is endogenously synthesized in the liver from saturated fats (101832,101834,101838). The effect of oleic acid supplementation on stroke risk is unknown.
• Ulcerative colitis. Although some contradictory evidence exists, a large population study has found that, after adjusting for dietary intake of omega-3 fatty acids, highest dietary intake of oleic acid is associated with a 97% reduced odds of developing ulcerative colitis when compared with the lowest intake (101846). The effect of oleic acid supplementation on ulcerative colitis risk is unknown.

(Read more about OLEIC ACID)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Ulcerative colitis. Limited clinical research shows that taking phosphatidylcholine products may improve clinical and remission scores in adults with ulcerative colitis. Details: Clinical research suggests that taking slow-release, phosphatidylcholine-rich phospholipids (Sterpur P-30 Granulat, Stern-Lecithin and Soja GmbH) improves symptoms and remission rate in patients with ulcerative colitis (68839,93389,93390,105728). A pooled analysis of 3 small randomized clinical trials in adults with chronic, active, ulcerative colitis at a single site shows that taking this specific form of phosphatidylcholine 1-4 grams daily for 3 months increases the odds of achieving clinical remission by 9.7 times when compared with placebo. Overall, 49% of the patients taking phosphatidylcholine achieved clinical remission. Taking phosphatidylcholine also improved quality of life and clinical improvement scores. In one study, this product also decreased the need for steroids, resulting in complete withdrawal of steroid therapy without exacerbation of disease in 80% of patients (93390). However, most patients in these studies were not treated with other standard therapies for ulcerative colitis, such as immunosuppressants and aminosalicylic acids. Subgroup analyses by dose suggest that the effective dose of this product is at least 1 gram daily; however, taking 3-4 grams daily may be more effective (93389,105728). In patients not responsive to mesalamine, some preliminary clinical research suggests taking LT-02 (Lipid Therapeutics GmbH), a modified-release formula of phosphatidylcholine, 3.2 grams daily for 12 weeks, improves symptoms of ulcerative colitis. Overall disease activity was improved by 52%, compared with 33% in those taking placebo. The effects on remission rate and mucosal healing were unclear; however, response rates were increased from 60% in the placebo group to 83% in the phosphatidylcholine group. In an 8-week follow-up, relapse was also less likely in patients treated with this product (93387).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Topical phosphatidylcholine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a topical cream containing niacinamide and linoleic acid-rich phosphatidylcholine (4% niacinamide-phospholipidic; N-PHCL emulsion) once daily for 12 weeks improves skin hydration and reduce acne lesions and inflammation when compared with a 1% clindamycin cream or a carrier-only cream in patients 15 years and older with moderate acne (93388).
• Aging. Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for aging, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Alcohol-related liver disease. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with alcohol-related liver disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with acute alcoholic hepatitis shows that taking polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine 6 grams orally daily for 24 months does not increase survival when compared with placebo (68843).
• Alzheimer disease. Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for Alzheimer disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Angina. Although there has been interest in using intravenous phosphatidylcholine for angina, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Anxiety. Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Atherosclerosis. Although there has been interest in using intravenous phosphatidylcholine for atherosclerosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for atopic dermatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Bipolar disorder. Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for bipolar disorder, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with dementia. Details: Population research in a sample of 1259 men in Finland suggests that high daily intake of phosphatidylcholine is associated with a 28% lower risk of developing dementia when compared with low daily intake, over a mean follow-up of about 22 years (103178).
• Fatty deposits. It is unclear if subcutaneous phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with fatty deposits. Details: Very low quality clinical research shows that administering subcutaneous injections of phosphatidylcholine 125 mg-250 mg every 7-15 days can reduce localized fatty deposits on the chin, thigh, hips, abdomen, back, neck, and elsewhere, based on subjective visual assessments, when compared with baseline (15621,15625,15627). Improvements appear to last for 2-3 years or longer (15621,15627). In one study, phosphatidylcholine injections markedly or moderately reduce localized fatty deposits on the face in about 80% of patients for a period of up to 3 years based on subjective patient self-assessment (15621).
• Hepatic encephalopathy. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with hepatic encephalopathy. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine 1050 mg daily for 6-8 weeks, either orally or through a nasogastric tube, does not improve recovery from encephalopathy compared with control in patients with acute or subacute liver failure. However, polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine seems to reduce mortality compared to control in patients with subacute, but not acute, liver failure (68835).
• Hepatitis A. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with hepatitis A. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 900 mg orally daily for 12 weeks does not seem to reduce serum bilirubin or liver enzyme levels in patients with hepatitis A when compared with no intervention (5225).
• Hepatitis B. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with hepatitis B. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing interferon treatment for hepatitis B shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 1.8 grams orally daily for 24 weeks improves clinical response when compared with placebo (5226). Other preliminary clinical research in patients with chronic active hepatitis B shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 3 grams orally improves histological disease scores when compared with control (5224).
• Hepatitis C. Oral phosphatidylcholine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing interferon treatment for hepatitis C shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 1.8 grams orally daily for 24 weeks improves clinical response when compared with placebo (5226).
• Hypercholesterolemia. Although there has been interest in using intravenous phosphatidylcholine for hypercholesterolemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Hyperlipidemia. Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for hyperlipidemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Hyperlipoproteinemia. Oral phosphatidylcholine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine 1.8 grams daily for 28 days in combination with clofibrate does not significantly reduce total cholesterol, triglycerides, or phospholipids compared to clofibrate alone in patients with primary hyperlipoproteinemia of Fredrickson Types II or IV. However, taking the combination of polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine plus clofibrate seems to significantly attenuate the relative increase in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when compared with clofibrate alone (68840).
• Infant development. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial for infant development. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking phosphatidylcholine (PhosChol, Nutrasal) 5 grams daily, containing choline 750 mg daily, from 18 weeks' gestation to 90 days postpartum does not improve cognitive function in the infant at 10-12 months of age when compared with corn oil placebo (93386).
• Lipoma. It is unclear if subcutaneous phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with lipoma. Details: An anecdotal report suggests that injecting a phosphatidylcholine solution directly into a lipoma can shrink the tumor by about 35%. However, in this report a major inflammatory reaction occurred, resulting in undesirable fibrotic changes to the tissue and eventual surgical excision of the lipoma (15622).
• Memory. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial for memory. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of phosphatidylcholine 25 grams (PC-55, TwinLab) orally can improve some measures of memory in healthy college students when compared with placebo (5228).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with NAFLD. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 600 mg orally three times daily for 24 weeks qualitatively improves liver echogenicity and structure on an ultrasound scan, suggesting a reduction in hepatic steatosis, when compared to baseline. There is also a small decrease in liver function test values, but with considerable variability both at baseline and at 24 weeks (103176,103177). Preliminary clinical evidence also suggests that taking a combination of the milk thistle constituent silybin, phosphatidylcholine, and vitamin E (Realsil, Instituto Biochimico Italiano) orally twice daily for 12 months improves liver function tests (LFTs) and liver histology when compared with placebo in people with NAFLD (63244). It is unclear if this effect is due to phosphatidylcholine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Periorbital fat pad herniation. It is unclear if subcutaneous phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with periorbital fat pad herniation. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that injecting phosphatidylcholine 20 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks markedly reduces lower eyelid fat pads in people with bulging fat pads due to herniation when compared to baseline. In some people, benefits appeared to last for a period of 9 months to 2 years or longer (15623,15628).
• Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for PAD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Peritoneal dialysis. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with peritoneal dialysis. Details: Very preliminary clinical research shows that taking phosphatidylcholine 900 mg orally daily for 8 weeks does not improve ultrafiltration in peritoneal dialysis when compared to baseline (5222).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Although there has been interest in using oral phosphatidylcholine for PMS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of phosphatidylcholine for this purpose.
• Tardive dyskinesia. It is unclear if oral phosphatidylcholine is beneficial in patients with tardive dyskinesia. Details: Preliminary clinical research taking phosphatidylcholine 30 grams orally daily for 6 weeks does not improve tardive dyskinesia symptoms when compared with placebo (5223). More evidence is needed to rate phosphatidylcholine for these uses.

(Read more about PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts typically found in foods (7141,7142,7144). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of alpha-linolenic acid when used in larger, medicinal amounts.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts typically found in foods (7141,7142,7145). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of alpha-linolenic acid during pregnancy and lactation when used in larger, medicinal amounts; avoid using.

(Read more about ALPHA-LINOLENIC ACID (ALA))

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Choline is safe in adults when taken in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 3.5 grams daily (3094) ...when used intravenously and appropriately. Intravenous choline 1-4 grams daily for up to 24 weeks has been used with apparent safety (5173,5174).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in doses above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 3. 5 grams daily. Higher doses can increase the risk of adverse effects (3094).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (3094). Choline is safe in children when taken in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL), which is 1 gram daily for children 1-8 years of age, 2 grams daily for children 9-13 years of age, and 3 grams daily for children 14-18 years of age (3094).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in doses above the UL. High doses can increase the risk of adverse effects (3094).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Choline is safe when taken in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL), which is 3 grams daily during pregnancy and lactation in those up to 18 years of age and 3.5 grams daily for those 19 years and older (3094,92114). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of choline used in higher doses during pregnancy and lactation.

(Read more about CHOLINE)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Inositol has been used with apparent safety in doses up to 18 grams daily for up to 6 weeks or 6 grams daily for 10 weeks (2184,2185,2187,95089). Myo-inositol 4 grams daily has also been used with apparent safety for 6 months (95085). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of inositol when used topically.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Inositol 80 mg/kg (maximum 2 grams) has been taken daily for up to 12 weeks in children aged 5-12 years (95092). ...when used enterally or intravenously and appropriately in premature infants for treating acute respiratory distress syndrome for up to 10 days (2191,2192,91546,91551).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used enterally or intravenously for extended durations in premature infants. A large clinical study in infants born at less than 28 weeks' gestation found that myo-inositol 40 mg/kg, given intravenously and then enterally every 12 hours for up to 10 weeks, was associated with a small increased risk of death (98946). Long-term follow-up until 24 months corrected age confirms that the initial increase in mortality rate in the myo-inositol group remained stable; however, there was no difference in a composite outcome of death or survival with moderate or severe neurodevelopmental impairment, as well as no difference in the risk of retinopathy of prematurity, between those who received myo-inositol or control (108819).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Myo-inositol has been used with apparent safety in amounts up to 4000 mg daily during pregnancy (91548,95082,104688).

LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using. Breast milk is rich in endogenous inositol (2138); however, the effects of exogenously administered inositol are not known.

(Read more about INOSITOL)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Lecithin has Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) status in the US (2619,105544). ...when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts. Lecithin has been used safely in doses of up to 30 grams daily for up to 6 weeks (5140,5149,5152,5156,14817,14822,14838,19212). ...when used topically (4914).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in food amounts. Lecithin has Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) status in the US (105544). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of medicinal amounts of lecithin during pregnancy or lactation; avoid using.

(Read more about LECITHIN)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in food amounts. Edible oils containing high amounts of oleic acid are commonly used in foods (26466,90681,94452,101821,101824,101828,101830,101838). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of oleic acid when used as medicine.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using in amounts greater than those commonly found in foods.

(Read more about OLEIC ACID)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Large doses up to 30 grams per day for 6 weeks (5223) and smaller doses of up to 6 grams daily for up to 24 months have been well tolerated (68839,68843,105728). ...when used subcutaneously and appropriately, short-term. Some research suggests that subcutaneous injections of 0.2 mL to 5 mL of a 5% phosphatidylcholine solution do not cause significant serious adverse effects when doses are administered up to five times and spaced apart by 2-4 weeks (15621,15623,15624,15625). ...when used topically as an emulsion also containing niacinamide for up to 12 weeks (93388).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally from 18 weeks of gestation at doses of up to 5 grams daily (93386)

LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE)

(Read more about ALPHA-LINOLENIC ACID (ALA))

ATROPINE Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, choline might decrease the effects of atropine in the brain.  Details Animal research shows that administering choline one hour before administering atropine can attenuate atropine-induced decreases in brain levels of acetylcholine (42240). Theoretically, concomitant use of choline and atropine may decrease the effects of atropine.

(Read more about CHOLINE)

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = A Theoretically, taking inositol with antidiabetes drugs might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.  Details Clinical research shows that inositol lowers blood glucose levels and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in patients with diabetes (95083,95084,95088).

(Read more about INOSITOL)

(Read more about LECITHIN)

(Read more about OLEIC ACID)

(Read more about PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE)

General ...Orally, alpha-linolenic acid from dietary sources is well tolerated when used in the diet as a replacement for other sources of fat, such as saturated fats.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is some concern that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid might increase the risk for prostate cancer, although research is conflicting.

Oncologic ...Epidemiologic research suggests that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid might increase risk for prostate cancer (1337,2558,7823,7147,12978). Other research suggests high intake or serum levels of alpha-linolenic acid does not increase the overall risk of prostate cancer (12961,15736); however, it might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer (12961). Association with prostate cancer appears to depend on the sources of alpha-linolenic acid. Dairy and meat sources has been positively associated with prostate cancer, whereas plant sources, such as flaxseed, don't seem to affect prostate cancer risk (12909). According to a clinical trial, intake of alpha-linolenic acid does not appear to increase levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) (91402). Also, longer-chain omega-3 fatty acids in fish oils are associated with a decreased risk of total and advanced prostate cancer (12961).

Other ...Alpha-linolenic acid is a type of fat, containing 9 kilocalories/gram, and may result in weight gain if consumed in excess. Patients should be advised that it's best to substitute alpha-linolenic acid in the diet for other sources of fat, such as saturated fats.

(Read more about ALPHA-LINOLENIC ACID (ALA))

General ...Orally, choline is well tolerated when used appropriately. Adverse effects have been reported with doses exceeding the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 3.5 grams daily.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Fishy body odor. At high doses of at least 9 grams daily, choline has been reported to cause diarrhea, nausea, salivation, sweating, and vomiting.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, doses of choline greater than 7. 5 grams daily may cause low blood pressure (94648).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, large doses of choline can cause nausea, vomiting, salivation, and anorexia (42275,91231). Gastrointestinal discomfort has reportedly occurred with doses of 9 grams daily, while gastroenteritis has reportedly occurred with doses of 32 grams daily (42291,42310). Doses of lecithin 100 grams standardized to 3.5% choline have reportedly caused diarrhea and fecal incontinence (42312).

Genitourinary ...Orally, large doses of choline greater than 9 grams daily have been reported to cause urinary incontinence (42291).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, high intake of choline may cause sweating due to peripheral cholinergic effects (42275).

Oncologic ...In one population study, consuming large amounts of choline was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer in females, even after adjusting for red meat intake (14845). However, more research is needed to confirm this finding.

Psychiatric ...Orally, large doses of choline (9 grams daily) have been associated with onset of depression in patients taking neuroleptics. Further research is needed to clarify this finding (42270).

Other ...Orally, choline intake may cause a fishy body odor due to intestinal metabolism of choline to trimethylamine (42285,42275,42310,92111,92112).

(Read more about CHOLINE)

General ...Orally and intravenously, inositol seems to be well tolerated. Topically, no adverse effects have been reported, although a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Diarrhea, gas, and nausea.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, inositol may cause nausea, diarrhea, gas, and gastrointestinal discomfort (10387,11972,91547,91549,95089,95090,95092).

Immunologic ...Orally, inositol in combination with omega-3 fatty acids has been associated with reports of cold and allergy symptoms in children in clinical research (95092).

Musculoskeletal ...Orally, inositol in combination with omega-3 fatty acids has been associated with reports of tics and other musculoskeletal side effects in children in clinical research (95092).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, inositol may cause dizziness, tiredness, insomnia, agitation, and headache (10387,11972,95089,95092). In combination with omega-3 fatty acids, inositol has been associated with reports of feelings of thirst in children in clinical research (95092).

Psychiatric ...In one case report, a 36-year-old male with adequately controlled bipolar disorder was hospitalized with symptoms of mania after consuming several cans of an energy drink containing inositol, caffeine, taurine, and other ingredients (Red Bull Energy Drink) over a period of 4 days (14302). It is not known if this is related to inositol, caffeine, taurine, a different ingredient, or a combination of the ingredients.

(Read more about INOSITOL)

General ...Orally, lecithin is well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, diarrhea, fullness, and nausea.

Dermatologic ...Orally, lecithin can cause allergic skin reactions in people with egg or soy allergies (15705).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, lecithin may cause abdominal pain, diarrhea, fullness, and nausea (5140,6243,14817,14822,14838,19204,59281).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, lecithin caused CNS complaints and agitation in one patient in a clinical trial (59261).

(Read more about LECITHIN)

General ...Orally, oleic acid generally well tolerated when used as part of oils and fats in the diet (26466,90681,94452,101821,101824,101828,101830,101838). Temporary burning in the mouth or throat has occurred in some patients (101848).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, oleic acid has caused temporary burning in the mouth or throat in some patients in one clinical study (101848).

(Read more about OLEIC ACID)

General ...Phosphatidylcholine is generally well tolerated when used orally, subcutaneously, or topically.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Altered taste, bloating, diarrhea, itching, nausea, sweating, vomiting.
Subcutaneously: Bruising, burning, edema, erythema, hematoma, itching, pain at the injection site.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Subcutaneously: Lipoma.

Dermatologic ...When taken orally, phosphatidylcholine may increase sweating (5229) and itching (63244). When given subcutaneously, phosphatidylcholine can cause pain, burning, itching, tenderness to touch, bruising, edema, and erythema at the injection site. The pain, itching and erythema usually resolve within 2 days of treatment; however localized tenderness can last longer (15623,15624,15626,15627,15628). Edema and bruising usually resolve within 10 days of treatment (15621,15623,15625). Some people can also develop nodules or hematoma at the injection site. This usually resolves within 30 days (15627).

Gastrointestinal ...Ingesting large amounts of phosphatidylcholine (30 grams per day) can cause gastrointestinal upset and diarrhea (5223). However, bloating, diarrhea, altered taste, nausea, and vomiting have been reported with smaller doses (63244,68843,93389,93390,105728). Although moderate subcutaneous doses do not usually cause systemic side effects, high doses exceeding 1.2 grams of phosphatidylcholine can cause nausea and abdominal pain in some people (15624).

Musculoskeletal ...Injecting phosphatidylcholine directly into a lipoma can result in a significant inflammatory response and undesirable fibrotic tissue changes (15622).

(Read more about PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE)