Vasogen Ultra by VMI Sports

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Dietary cocoa seems to be beneficial for CVD prevention. Oral cocoa extract may reduce the risk of CVD-related death, but it is unclear if it can prevent other CVD-related outcomes like myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. Details: A large clinical trial in adults without CVD shows that taking a specific cocoa extract daily for around 3.5 years reduces the risk of CVD-related death by 27%, but does not reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, including MI or stroke, or overall mortality when compared with placebo. This specific cocoa extract contained 500 mg of flavanols, including 80 mg of epicatechins (108898). In 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that very limited scientific evidence suggests that the cocoa flavanols in high flavanol cocoa powder, for products containing at least 4% naturally conserved cocoa flavanols, may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (110017). Observational research in adults without CVD has also found that consuming a higher amount of cocoa is associated with a 10% lower risk of CVD and an up to 50% lower risk of CVD-related mortality when compared with consuming lower amounts of cocoa. Consuming more than 90 grams of cocoa per week did not add further benefit (14288,97192). Additional clinical research shows that taking cocoa flavanols 450 mg twice daily for one month improves cholesterol levels and blood pressure values, resulting in improved Framingham Risk Scores in healthy patients. These scores correspond to a 21% decrease in the 10-year risk for coronary heart disease, a 22% decrease in the risk for CVD, a 31% decrease in the risk for MI, and a 30% decrease in the risk for CVD-related mortality (92273). There is also evidence that consuming cocoa might improve flow-mediated dilatation, a measure of endothelial dysfunction. Meta-analyses of clinical research have found that increased cocoa or chocolate intake significantly improves flow-mediated dilatation. This is seen with intakes of 19-54 grams of cocoa daily, 46-100 grams of dark chocolate daily, or cocoa products containing 16.6-1080 mg of flavonoids daily (17187,42059,42137).
• Hypertension. Oral cocoa seems to be beneficial for modestly decreasing blood pressure in hypertensive patients. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for preventing hypertension. Details: Overall, clinical research shows that chocolate or cocoa containing 25-1080 mg daily of flavonoids modestly reduces blood pressure in hypertensive patients (14306,15655,15752,42092,42107,42169,97190,103247). Meta-analyses of clinical research show that consuming commercially available dark chocolate or flavanol-enriched chocolate/cocoa products daily for 2-8 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure (SBP) by around 4 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by around 2 mmHg in patients with hypertension when compared to control products with low levels of flavanols or no flavanols (42169,97190). Additionally, a meta-analysis of clinical trials in middle-aged and elderly patients with or without hypertension shows that consuming cocoa products daily for 4-18 weeks reduces SBP and DBP by around 3 mmHg and 1.5 mmHg, respectively, when compared with control products (103249). Blood pressure lowering seems to occur more readily in hypertensive or pre-hypertensive individuals when compared with normotensive individuals (14306,15655,15752,42092,42107,42169,97190,103247). Consumption of cocoa might also reduce the risk of developing hypertension in normotensive patients. Observational research has found that long-term consumption of moderate amounts of cocoa (2.2 grams to 6.1 grams daily) is associated with a 7% lower risk of hypertension when compared with consumption of less than 0.61 grams daily. However, consumption of amounts greater than 6.1 grams daily does not seem to reduce hypertension risk. Also, this benefit seems to be limited to patients consuming cocoa from plain chocolate, as consumption of cocoa from desserts was linked with a 9% greater risk of hypertension (103248).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Hypercholesterolemia. Oral cocoa does not seem to be beneficial for reducing cholesterol levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Details: Some preliminary clinical research in healthy, normocholesterolemic males shows that diets high in stearic acid from cocoa butter result in lower cholesterol levels when compared with diets high in myristic acid from dairy butter. However, a diet high in stearic acid from cocoa butter does not significantly lower cholesterol when compared to baseline in this population (15063). A meta-analysis of 10 clinical studies shows that cocoa or dark chocolate can reduce total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in normocholesterolemic patients (42125). However, some preliminary clinical research in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that drinking a high-flavanol cocoa beverage daily for 6 weeks does not reduce cholesterol when compared with a low-flavanol cocoa beverage (42013). Also, while some clinical research shows that taking cocoa powder 26 grams with sugar daily for 12 weeks can increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels when compared with sugar alone in normocholesterolemic and hypercholesterolemic patients (42026), taking cocoa or dark chocolate 13-41 grams daily does not seem to lower total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol in these patients (42026,42029,42225).
• Stretch marks (striae gravidarum). Topical cocoa butter does not seem to be beneficial for preventing stretch marks during pregnancy. Details: Clinical research shows that topical application with a cream containing cocoa butter 25% to the abdomen daily, starting during the second and third trimesters and continuing until delivery, does not prevent stretch marks when compared with a placebo cream (105261). Other clinical research shows that topical application with a cream containing cocoa butter and vitamin E as tocopheryl acetate to the abdomen, breasts, and thighs, daily, starting during the second trimester and continuing until delivery, does not reduce the prevalence or severity of stretch marks when compared to a cream not containing these ingredients (105262). More research is needed in individuals of all skin types.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for improving cognitive function in healthy older adults. Details: Some small clinical studies in healthy adults over the age of 60 with or without existing cognitive impairment show that sub-chronic intake of cocoa at doses of 45 mg, 520 mg, or 990 mg once daily for 8 weeks, or as a cocoa drink containing flavanols 609 mg daily for 30 days, modestly improves some measures of cognitive function, including task switching, visual attention, and verbal fluency (42184,92269). However, it does not improve performance on the mini mental state exam (92269). Also, one clinical study in healthy adults aged 60 years and older shows that consuming a dark chocolate bar containing 11 grams of cocoa and drinking 237 mL of an artificially sweetened drink containing 11 grams of cocoa daily for 6 weeks does not improve neuropsychological function when compared with placebo (42050). Additional preliminary clinical research in postmenopausal females aged 50-64 years shows that adding chocolate 10 grams daily, containing 99% cocoa, for 6 months does not improve most measures of cognitive function when compared with not taking cocoa (105259). Reasons for the discrepancies are unclear but may relate to the dose of cocoa, the duration of intake, or the specific cognitive testing procedures conducted.
• Age-related testosterone deficiency. Oral cocoa has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy middle-aged adults shows that taking a combination product containing cocoa seed extract and pomegranate rind (Tesnor, Gencor) daily for 56 days increases serum testosterone levels and hand-grip strength and improves measures of sexual function and psychological well-being when compared with placebo (111527). It is unclear if these effects are due to cocoa, pomegranate, or the combination.
• Aging skin. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for aging skin. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with aging skin shows taking a specific product (GliSODin Skin Nutrients Advanced Anti-Aging Formula, Isocell North America Inc.) 780 mg three times daily, containing cocoa extract, as well as superoxide dismutase, krill oil, sea buckthorn, hyaluronic acid, and other nutrients, in combination with daily use of tazarotene cream 0.1%, for 90 days improves fine wrinkling, photodamage, and skin elasticity when compared with tazarotene cream and placebo (91778). Additional preliminary clinical research in patients with photoaged skin shows that drinking a cocoa drink containing 320 mg of flavanols daily for 24 weeks improves wrinkle depth and skin elasticity, but not skin hydration, when compared with placebo (92274).
• Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral cocoa for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cocoa for this condition.
• Athletic performance. Although there has been interest in using oral cocoa for improving athletic performance, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cocoa for this use.
• Atrial fibrillation. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for preventing atrial fibrillation. Details: Most population research has found that chocolate consumption is not associated with a reduced risk of atrial fibrillation (97188,97189).
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for CFS. Details: In patients with CFS, preliminary clinical research shows that consuming 45 grams of a polyphenol-rich chocolate in three divided doses daily for 8 weeks can reduce fatigue by 35%, anxiety by 37%, and depression by 45%, and can increase overall function by 30%, when compared with pretreatment (42116).
• Cirrhosis. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for cirrhosis. Details: Clinical research shows that consuming a liquid test meal (Ensure Plus) in addition to dark chocolate (Lindt Excellence 85% Cocoa, Lindt & Sprüngli) 0.55 grams/kg can reduce the postprandial increase in hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhosis when compared with the test drink alone (42164).
• Cognitive function. Research on the use of oral cocoa for improving cognitive function in healthy adults is conflicting. Details: A large clinical trial in older adults shows that taking cocoa extract containing 500 mg of flavanols daily for 3 years does not improve measures of cognitive function including global cognition, episodic memory, and executive function when compared with placebo, even when taken with a multivitamin-mineral product (Centrum Silver) (111524). Also, in middle-aged participants, clinical research shows that taking 20 grams of a dark chocolate drink mix containing 250 mg or 500 mg of polyphenols as a single dose does not seem to improve measures of cognitive function (92272). In contrast, clinical research in healthy younger individuals shows that consuming a single dose of cocoa flavanols 520-994 mg as a specific powder (Cocoapro) improves some, but not all, measures of cognitive function when examined in a situation of sustained mental effort (42093). Additionally, consuming a single dose of cocoa flavanols 900 mg as a specific powder (Acticoa) seems to improve reaction time during cognitive testing when compared with placebo in healthy adults and patients with type 1 diabetes (103251). However, acute dosing with cocoa flavanols 374-747 mg as specific powders (Acticoa) or cocoa extract capsules (Naturex) does not seem to improve measures of cognitive function, visual working memory, or ability to focus during testing in young people (99984,99985,109448). Reasons for the discrepancies are unclear but may relate to the dose of cocoa, the duration of intake, the level of stress during cognitive testing, or the specific cognitive testing procedures conducted.
• Cognitive impairment. Oral cocoa flavanols have only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; their effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults at least 55 years of age with subjective or mild cognitive impairment shows that consuming dark chocolate containing 500 mg cocoa flavanols and taking fish oil containing DHA 1.1 grams and EPA 0.4 grams daily for 12 months does not improve cognitive function scores when compared with placebo (111453).
• Constipation. Oral cocoa husk has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children with chronic constipation shows that taking 2-4 sachets containing cocoa husk 8-16 grams and beta-fructosans 2-4 grams daily for 4 weeks can reduce hard stools by 45% and reduce transit time by 36 hours when compared with a placebo (42016).
• Diabetes. Several small clinical studies suggest that oral cocoa may cause small but clinically insignificant improvements in glycemic control in patients with diabetes. However, cocoa does not appear to be beneficial for the prevention of diabetes. Details: While some individual studies show conflicting results (97252,99982), two similar meta-analyses of 8-9 small clinical trials in patients with diabetes show that taking cocoa 1-54 grams daily for up to 52 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose by around 7-9 mg/dL and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by around 10-15 mg/dL, but does not improve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin levels, blood pressure, total cholesterol, or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, when compared with control (109447,109449). This slight improvement in fasting blood glucose, along with a lack of effect on HbA1c, suggests that cocoa is unlikely to lead to clinically meaningful improvements in glycemic control. Population research has found that eating up to 60 grams of chocolate per week is associated with a lower risk of developing diabetes. Higher consumption was not found to affect diabetes risk (97192). However, secondary analysis of a large clinical study in adults aged 74 on average shows that taking an extract containing cocoa flavanols 500 mg daily, with or without a multivitamin, for about 3.5 years does not reduce the risk of developing self-reported type 2 diabetes when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis based on body mass index, level of physical activity, or multivitamin consumption did not change results (111619).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral cocoa flavanols are beneficial for preventing exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of cocoa flavanols (Chococru Extraordinary Flavanol Cocoa) 830 mg or 1245 mg within 5 minutes of a strenuous exercise protocol does not reduce exercise-induced muscle damage over 72 hours when compared with a control providing no cocoa flavanols (105260).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for fatigue. Details: A moderate-size clinical study in otherwise healthy females aged 40-60 years with fatigue shows that consuming a beverage containing cocoa flavanols 240 mg daily for 8 weeks does not improve self-reported fatigue scores when compared with placebo (111620).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for heart failure prevention. Details: Population research has found that consuming up to 250 grams of chocolate weekly is associated with reduced risk of heart failure. However, consuming 300 grams weekly or more does not appear to affect the risk of heart failure (97187,97191).
• HIV/AIDS-related dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for HIV/AIDS-related dyslipidemia. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with HIV shows that consuming dark chocolate 65 grams containing cocoa 36 grams for 15 days does not affect low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or total cholesterol levels when compared with a white chocolate placebo. However, it slightly increases levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (96472).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial in patients with prediabetes. Details: A small clinical study in premenopausal adults with overweight or obesity and mild insulin resistance shows that drinking a cocoa drink high in flavanols twice daily for 4 weeks does not improve measures of insulin resistance or insulin-mediated glucose uptake when compared with a low-flavanol cocoa drink (111532).
• Influenza. Although there has been interest in using oral cocoa for influenza, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cocoa for this condition.
• Insect repellent. It is unclear if topical cocoa oil is beneficial as an insect repellent. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that topical application of cocoa oil, 1 mL on each leg and 0.5 mL on each forearm, reduces bites from black flies (Simulium damnosum) by 99% (41954).
• Isolated systolic hypertension. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for isolated systolic hypertension. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming 100 grams daily of cocoa polyphenol-rich dark chocolate might modestly reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (13166).
• Menopausal symptoms. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for menopausal symptoms. Details: In postmenopausal individuals aged 50-64 years, preliminary clinical research shows that adding chocolate 10 grams daily, containing cocoa 99%, for 6 months reduces body fat mass by approximately 0.6 kg and body fat percentage by 0.8%, and modestly improves some measures of quality of life, when compared with no treatment (105255,105258). However, there was no effect on all measures of quality of life, general menopausal symptoms, weight, body mass index, or most measures of cognitive function (105255,105258,105259).
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Although there has been interest in using oral cocoa for MS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cocoa for this condition.
• Muscle strength. Oral cocoa seed extract has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy males shows that taking a combination product containing cocoa seed extract and pomegranate rind extract 400 mg daily for 8 weeks increases testosterone levels, hand grip strength, and upper arm circumference when compared with placebo (108485).
• Nipple fissures. It is unclear if topical cocoa butter is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of nipple fissures. Details: A small clinical study in breastfeeding adults shows that applying topical cocoa butter to the nipple and areola after each breastfeeding session for 10 days immediately postpartum reduces nipple pain, rashes, and cracks when compared with the topical application of the mother's breastmilk (111525). The validity of this study is limited by a lack of blinding and a high dropout rate.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for obesity. Details: Preliminary clinical research in overweight or obese premenopausal females shows that following a reduced-calorie diet in addition to consuming two squares of dark chocolate and drinking 8 ounces of a sugar-free cocoa beverage daily for 18 weeks does not increase weight loss when compared with the reduced-calorie diet plus a non-chocolate snack (42130,99983).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for Parkinson disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming a single dose of dark chocolate 200 grams containing approximately 80% cocoa does not improve motor function in patients with Parkinson disease when compared with a white chocolate control, although there seems to be some improvements after one hour when compared with baseline (42156).
• Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for PAD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with PAD shows that drinking a flavanol-rich cocoa beverage 15 grams daily for 6 months increases 6-minute walking distance by up to 43 meters when compared with placebo (103250). Cocoa has also been studied in adults with diabetes at risk for developing PAD, with conflicting results. A small clinical study in adults with and without diabetes shows that taking a single dose of cocoa flavanols 790 mg does not improve peripheral microvascular or macrovascular parameters compared with placebo (111529). However, another small clinical study in healthy adults and those with diabetes at risk for PAD shows that taking cocoa flavanols (CocoaVia, Mars Inc) 1350 mg improves endothelial function in the brachial and femoral arteries after 2 hours when compared with placebo, suggesting that cocoa flavanols might reduce the risk of developing PAD in both populations studied (111528). The validity of this study is limited by the small sample size and short study duration.
• Stroke. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Population research has found that the highest dietary intake of chocolate is associated with a 16% reduced risk of stroke when compared with the lowest intake (97192). More evidence is needed to rate cocoa for these uses.

(Read more about COCOA)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Angina. It is unclear if oral hawthorn is beneficial in patients with angina. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with angina taking chronic beta-adrenergic receptor blockers or ACE inhibitor therapy shows that taking a hawthorn (Crataegus pinnatifada) extract 100 mg orally three times daily for four weeks improves angina and electrocardiogram (ECG) findings and reduces nitroglycerin intake when compared with placebo (19242). Other preliminary clinical research in patients with unstable angina shows that taking hawthorn 10 grams and hu zang 15 grams orally daily for 4 weeks does not reduce the frequency of angina pectoris attacks when compared with control. However, taking hawthorn and hu zang improved some subjective symptom scores and quality of life scores (109610).
• Anxiety. Oral hawthorn has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A clinical study in adults with mild to moderate generalized anxiety shows that taking a specific product (Sympathyl, not available in the US) containing hawthorn, magnesium, and California poppy for 90 days modestly improves anxiety scores when compared with placebo (12583). Also, a clinical study in adults with adjustment disorder and anxious mood shows that hawthorn, in combination with black horehound, passion flower, valerian, kola nut, and guarana, modestly improves anxiety scores when compared with placebo (6250). It is unclear if these effects are due to hawthorn, other ingredients, or the combination. Another small clinical study in healthy adults shows that taking a combination of herbal extracts containing hawthorn, passionflower, ballota, and valerian root daily for 14 days reduces subjective anxiety and objective sympathetic and autonomic nervous system activation in response to a psychosocial stressor when compared with placebo (111222). It is unclear if these effects are due to hawthorn, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Arrhythmia. Although there has been interest in using oral hawthorn for arrhythmia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of arrhythmia for this condition.
• Atherosclerosis. Although there has been interest in using oral hawthorn for atherosclerosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of arrhythmia for this condition.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although there has been interest in using oral hawthorn for CVD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of arrhythmia for this condition.
• Cognitive function. Oral hawthorn has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In a preliminary clinical trial, a single dose of 25 drops of a combination product of D-camphor and hawthorn berry extract (Korodin) was superior to placebo for increasing cognitive performance in elderly female patients as measured by visuomotor speed and information processing capacity. The active treatment group showed an improvement in attentional and mental performance (19240,91504).
• Congestive heart failure (CHF). The evidence on the effects of oral hawthorn in patients with CHF is conflicting. Although some older research suggests it may be beneficial, more recent, larger studies suggest it may actually increase the risk for complications. Details: There is contradictory evidence about the effects of hawthorn extract in heart failure patients. Several clinical studies show that taking specific hawthorn leaf and flower extracts (LI 132, Faros 300, Lichtwer Pharma; WS 1442, Crataegutt forte, Dr. Willmar Schwabe Pharmaceuticals; or HeartCare, Nature's Way) 240-600 mg daily improves ejection fraction and exercise tolerance, reduces subjective symptoms, and decreases the risk of death in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) stage II heart failure. In these studies, the maximum effect was usually seen after 6-12 weeks of treatment (8279,8280,11449,19221,19223,19225,19226,19227,19228). Another clinical trial shows that hawthorn extract (WS 1442, Crataegutt forte, Dr. Willmar Schwabe Pharmaceuticals or HeartCare, Nature's Way) 1800 mg daily, combined with diuretic therapy, improves exercise tolerance and reduces subjective symptoms in NYHA stage III heart failure. In this study, maximum effect was usually seen after 16 weeks of treatment (8281). In another trial, patients with NYHA II heart failure taking either hawthorn (LI 132, Faros) 300 mg three times daily or captopril 12.5 mg three times daily experienced similar improvements in cardiac performance and symptoms (19230). However, other clinical research suggests no benefit and possible harm with hawthorn. A large-scale clinical trial (SPICE) in patients with NYHA stage II or III heart failure shows that taking specific hawthorn extracts (WS 1442, Crataegutt forte, Dr. Willmar Schwabe Pharmaceuticals; HeartCare, Nature's Way) 900 mg daily for 24 months, in combination with conventional treatment, does not decrease hospitalization due to progressive heart failure, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or cardiac death (17203). Another clinical trial in patients with NYHA stage II or III heart failure shows that taking these same specific hawthorn extracts at the same dose for up to 6 months does not slow the progression of heart failure when compared with placebo (19222). In a retrospective analysis of this study, it was shown that heart failure progression was significantly increased in patients taking hawthorn when compared with placebo. The rate of death was also increased by 1.7% over placebo, and heart failure-related hospitalizations increased by 8% over placebo in patients treated with hawthorn (16824).
• Hyperlipidemia. Although there has been interest in using oral hawthorn for hyperlipidemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of arrhythmia for this condition.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral hawthorn is beneficial for lowering blood pressure. Details: One preliminary clinical trial showed that taking hawthorn standardized extract 1,000-2,500 mg daily for three days does not significantly reduce blood pressure in hypertensive or prehypertensive patients when compared with placebo (19244). However, another study in patients with diabetes and hypertension shows that taking a specific hawthorn extract (LI 132) 1,200mg daily for 16 weeks significantly decreased diastolic, but not systolic, blood pressure when compared with placebo (19245).
• Orthostatic hypotension. Oral hawthorn has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in older adults with orthostatic hypotension shows that taking a specific combination product containing hawthorn and camphor (Korodin Herz-Kreislauf-Tropfen) 25 drops orally three times daily for 7 days attenuates the blood pressure reduction upon standing when compared with placebo. Signs and symptoms of orthostatic hypotension such as dizziness, blurry vision, and falls also seem to be reduced when compared with baseline (39614,39617). A meta-analysis of 4 studies shows that giving single doses of 20-25 drops of the same combination product increases systolic and diastolic blood pressure when compared with placebo (103620). However, the studies have methodologic problems and, while 2 were conducted in females with orthostatic hypotension, the others involved health young adults or normotensive elderly subjects. The effect of hawthorn alone for treatment of orthostatic hypotension has not been determined. The combination product used in these studies is not available in the US. More evidence is needed to rate hawthorn for these uses.

(Read more about HAWTHORN)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Asthma. Oral maritime pine bark extract, taken as an adjunct to conventional asthma medications, may improve symptoms and reduce rescue inhaler use in patients with asthma. Details: Three small clinical studies in children and adults with asthma of varying severity show that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 1 mg/lb body weight or 100 mg daily in addition to conventional asthma medications increases peak expiratory flow, decreases asthma symptoms, and decreases the need for rescue medications when compared with conventional therapy alone (13120,50863,50926). Maritime pine bark extract has not been studied as monotherapy for asthma and should not be used in place of conventional medicine for this purpose.
• Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). Oral maritime pine bark extract may improve leg pain and heaviness and reduce edema in patients with CVI. Details: Several clinical studies in patients with CVI show that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) reduces edema, the rate of ankle swelling, and symptoms of leg pain and heaviness when used for 3-12 weeks. The most commonly used dose is 100-120 mg three times daily (2451,2462,2493,7693,50892). However, lower doses of 50 mg three times daily (16906,50892,50900,50915) or 45-100 mg once daily also seem to be effective (2435,97401). When compared with the use of below-knee compression stockings worn throughout the day, maritime pine bark reduces induration and the rate of ankle swelling when compared to baseline in patients with CVI. While both treatments reduce venous edema and pain when compared with baseline, a more pronounced reduction is seen in patients taking the maritime pine bark extract (97401). Other clinical research in adults who have had CVI for more than 3 years shows that taking the same extract, 50 mg three times daily for 8 weeks, in addition to wearing compression stockings, improves microcirculation and subjective symptom scores when compared with compression stockings alone (103616). However, compliance with the use of compression stockings in this study was poor.
• Osteoarthritis. Small clinical studies suggest that oral maritime pine bark extract may modestly improve symptoms and reduce the need for analgesics in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with knee osteoarthritis shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 100-150 mg daily for 3 months reduces overall osteoarthritis symptoms, pain, and the use of anti-inflammatory medication when compared with placebo (50903,50905). Topical maritime pine bark has also been evaluated. Observational research in patients with knee osteoarthritis found that applying standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 220 mg, as two patches daily, for three weeks is associated with reduced pain and reduced need for rescue analgesics when compared with control (100356).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Hyperlipidemia. Oral maritime pine bark extract may not improve lipid levels in patients with hyperlipidemia. Details: Although individual clinical trials have shown mixed results (7693,91965,97408), a meta-analysis of 4 small clinical trials in patients with hyperlipidemia shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 100-150 mg daily for 4-24 weeks does not reduce total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or triglyceride levels when compared with a control (100357).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in elderly patients with age-related cognitive decline. Details: One observational registry study in healthy elderly patients ages 55-70 years has found that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 100 mg daily for 12 months is associated with improved cognitive function, mental performance, and attention when compared with matched controls (97405). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the unblinded, non-randomized nature of the study. Also, a small clinical study in healthy elderly patients 60-85 years of age shows that taking the same extract, 150 mg daily for 3 months, improves spatial working memory, but not numeric working memory, episodic memory, attention, or psychomotor performance, when compared with placebo (50906).
• Aging skin. Although there has been interest in using oral and topical maritime pine for aging skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of maritime pine for this purpose.
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in people with allergic rhinitis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with birch allergies shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 50 mg twice daily, starting at least 5 weeks before allergy season, decreases nasal symptoms associated with birch allergies when compared with placebo (17300).
• Androgenic alopecia. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark is beneficial for androgenic alopecia. Details: A small clinical study in postmenopausal patients conducted in China shows that taking maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg daily for 6 months improves hair density when compared to baseline (112713). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by the lack of a statistical comparison to the placebo group.
• Antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark is beneficial for improving sexual function in adults taking escitalopram. Details: A small, open-label clinical study shows that taking standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 50 mg daily for 4 months with escitalopram 10-20 mg daily seems to improve sexual dysfunction when compared with escitalopram alone (100361).
• Atherosclerosis. Oral maritime pine bark extract has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A non-randomized clinical trial in adults with atherosclerosis shows that taking a specific maritime pine bark product (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg and gotu kola 225 mg, in two divided doses daily for 3 months, reduces plaque height and length and increases plaque echogenicity and stability when compared to control (97030). However, these benefits may be at least partially due to gotu kola. Another non-randomized clinical study in adults with atherosclerotic plaques and no other cardiovascular risk factors shows that taking Pycnogenol 100 mg and gotu kola extract 100 mg daily for up to 4 years reduces plaque progression and increases plaque echogenicity to a greater extent than Pycnogenol alone or no treatment at all. Taking Pycnogenol with gotu kola is also associated with a reduced rate of clinical vascular events, including angina, myocardial infarction, minor transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), and minor strokes, when compared with taking Pycnogenol alone or receiving no treatment at all (97029).
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial for improving exercise capacity in recreationally trained adults; the available evidence is conflicting. Details: One small clinical study shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 200 mg orally daily for 30 days improves exercise capacity during a treadmill test in recreational athletes aged 20-35 years (2554). Additionally, an observational registry study found that taking this same maritime pine bark extract 100 mg orally daily for 8 weeks along with training improves performance in the Army Physical Fitness Test, including reducing two-mile treadmill time by about 45-60 seconds and increasing the number of push-ups and sit-ups by about 5-7 when compared to control training alone. Taking this maritime pine bark extract during training also appears to improve total triathlon time by about 6 minutes when compared with training alone (91966). However, the validity of this finding is limited by the unblinded, non-randomized nature of the study. Additionally, a small study in college-age males who exercise regularly shows that taking the same maritime pine bark extract 800 mg daily, starting 14 days prior to a cycle ergometer test and continuing for 2 days after, does not improve maximum oxygen consumption or power generated in the test when compared with placebo (103617). Maritime pine extract has also been studied in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical study in non-professional athletes shows that taking a combination product (PycnoRacer, Kobayashi Pharmaceutical Company) containing maritime pine extract 15 mg, L-leucine 0.6 grams, L-arginine 0.3 grams, L-isoleucine 0.3 grams, and L-valine 0.3 grams four times daily for 3 weeks during training improves running distance by about 19%, compared with 9% in athletes drinking water plus Gatorade. Maritime pine park also improved maximal oxygen consumption and reduced subjective scores of muscle pain and cramps when compared with water and Gatorade (103613). It is unclear if these benefits are due to maritime pine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in children or adults with ADHD. Details: A small clinical study in adults with ADHD shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) does not seem to improve ADHD symptoms when compared with placebo (9984). However, a small clinical study in children with ADHD shows that taking this standardized maritime pine bark extract 1 mg/kg daily for one month appears to improve attention and hyperactivity scores when compared with placebo (50891).
• Behcet syndrome. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with Behcet syndrome. Details: A small clinical study in patients with Behcet syndrome shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg daily for 3 weeks reduces skin ulcer size and improves self-reported symptoms of burning and pain when compared to baseline (100358). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with BPH. Details: A small observational registry study in patients with BPH found that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg daily for 8 weeks is associated with modest improvement of symptoms such as bladder emptying, urgency, flow, straining, and nocturia (100359). This study was limited by small size, reporting inaccuracies, and its unblinded, non-randomized design.
• Cognitive function. Small clinical studies suggest that oral maritime pine bark extract might improve cognitive function in healthy adults. Details: A small observational registry study in healthy adults aged 30-55 years found that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg daily for 12 weeks is associated with slightly improved memory and cognition when compared with matched controls (97410). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the unblinded, non-randomized nature of the study. A small clinical study in healthy college students also shows that taking the same extract 100 mg daily for 2 months seems to reduce failed tests by 4.5% and improve average test scores by about 8% when compared with control (50928).
• Cognitive impairment. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract improves cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Details: An observational registry study in adults with mild cognitive impairment found that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg daily for 8 weeks improves global cognitive function when compared to no supplementation. All patients in this study also received standard management of mild cognitive impairment, which included lifestyle modifications such as improved sleep, physical exercise, reduced sugar and salt intake, lowering cardiovascular risk factors, and avoiding use of stimulants or depressants (97406). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the unblinded, non-randomized nature of the study.
• Common cold. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in the treatment of the common cold. Details: An observational registry study in otherwise healthy adults with a cold found that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 50 mg twice daily, along with best management for colds, is associated with about one less day of a perceived cold when compared to "best management" alone. This standardized maritime pine bark extract is also linked to reduced use of over-the-counter products to manage symptoms in cases of colds lasting longer than 4 days (91962). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the unblinded, non-randomized nature of the study.
• Dental plaque. It is unclear if chewing gum containing maritime pine bark extract can reduce dental plaque. Details: A small clinical study shows that chewing a minimum of six pieces of gum containing a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 5 mg daily for 14 days reduces gingival bleeding by 55% and prevents an increase in gingival plaque when compared with a control sugar-free gum (50857).
• Diabetes. Small clinical studies suggest that oral maritime pine bark extract may modestly improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Details: Three small clinical studies in patients with type 2 diabetes show that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 50-200 mg daily for 3-12 weeks modestly decreases blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels when compared with placebo (15521,15522,50908). Another small clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria shows that taking a different standardized maritime pine bark extract (Oligopin, DRT Group) 100 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces HbA1c by around 1%, but does not reduce fasting blood glucose, when compared with placebo (105781).
• Diabetic foot ulcers. It is unclear if oral or topical maritime pine bark extract is beneficial for diabetic foot ulcers. Details: A small clinical study in patients with diabetic foot ulcers shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg daily orally as well as applying the extract topically 100 mg daily heals ulcers in 89% of subjects compared with 61% of control subjects. Using oral or topical maritime pine bark extract alone seems to result in complete ulcer healing in about 85% of subjects (50896).
• Diabetic microangiopathy. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with diabetic microangiopathy. Details: A small, unblinded clinical study in patients with diabetic microangiopathy, symptoms of neuropathy, and edema in the absence of severe cardiovascular disease shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 50 mg three times daily for 4 weeks improves microcirculation (measured by laser Doppler flowmetry) and symptoms when compared with no treatment (15523).
• Diabetic retinopathy. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Details: A small, unblinded clinical study in patients with retinopathy due to various causes, including diabetes, atherosclerosis, or central venous thrombosis, shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 50 mg three times daily for 2 months may slow or prevent further deterioration of retinal function when compared with no treatment (2536).
• Dry mouth. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with dry mouth. Details: Two small observational studies in otherwise healthy adults or patients with diabetes suggest that adding a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) for 2 weeks along with standard saliva supplements is associated with improvement in patient-reported mouth dryness, salivary flow, and the number of small mucosal breaks when compared with saliva supplements alone. One study dosed maritime pine bark extract 150 mg orally daily and the other used a spray formulation dosed 10 mg six times daily (103612,112714). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the unblinded, non-randomized nature of the studies.
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with dysmenorrhea. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with dysmenorrhea show that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 30-60 daily for up to 3 menstrual cycles reduces pain when compared to baseline (15424,50904). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). Small clinical studies suggest that oral maritime pine bark extract, taken alone or in combination with L-arginine, may modestly improve sexual function in patients with ED. Details: Several small clinical studies in adults with ED show that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) at a dose of 120 mg daily for 3 months, either alone (12012) or in combination with L-arginine (10416,32149,50924), might improve sexual function when compared with placebo or baseline measurements. It seems to take up to 3 months of treatment for significant improvement. Similarly, a meta-analysis of 2 small clinical studies in males with mild to moderate ED shows that taking maritime pine 80 mg with L- arginine daily for 1-6 months improves International Index of Erectile Dysfunction scores by 9 points when compared with control (112715). It is unclear if this effect is from maritime pine, L-arginine, or the combination.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Oral maritime pine bark extract has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in non-professional athletes shows that taking a combination product (PycnoRacer, Kobayashi Pharmaceutical Company) containing maritime pine extract 15 mg, L-leucine 0.6 grams, L-arginine 0.3 grams, L-isoleucine 0.3 grams, and L-valine 0.3 grams four times daily for 3 weeks during training improves subjective scores for muscle pain and cramps when compared with water plus Gatorade (103613). It is unclear if these benefits are due to maritime pine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Glaucoma. Oral maritime pine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effects when used alone is unclear. Details: One small, unblinded clinical trial in Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma shows that taking a specific product (Sante Glagenox, Saten Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.) containing maritime pine extract 40 mg and bilberry fruit extract 90 mg daily for 4 weeks reduces intraocular pressure by 8.7% when compared to baseline (104192). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Heart failure. Oral maritime pine bark extract has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small observational study in patients with mild to moderate heart failure has found that taking a specific combination product (PycnoQ10, Natural Health Science Inc.) containing a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) and coenzyme Q10 for 12 weeks is associated with improved exercise capacity and heart function (44178). It is unclear if these findings are due to maritime pine, coenzyme Q10, or the combination.
• Hemorrhoids. It is unclear if oral or topical maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with hemorrhoids. Details: A small clinical study in patients with acute hemorrhoidal episodes shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150-300 mg daily orally, alone or in combination with a cream containing 0.5% standardized maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) for 7 days, improves both quality of life and hemorrhoidal symptoms when compared with placebo tablets/cream (50912). Additionally, an observational registry study in postpartum adults with internal or external hemorrhoids found that taking this same extract of maritime pine bark 150 mg daily for 6 months, in conjunction with standard hemorrhoid care, is associated with improved symptoms, including thrombosis, pain, swelling, and bleeding, when compared to standard care alone (97416). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the unblinded, non-randomized nature of the study.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark reduces blood pressure; the available research is conflicting. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with mild hypertension (systolic 140-159 mm Hg; diastolic 90-99 mm Hg) shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 200 mg daily for 8 weeks may modestly reduce systolic, but not diastolic, blood pressure when compared with placebo (10214). Another very small study in hypertensive patients treated with ramipril, taking this same standardized maritime pine bark extract 50 mg three times daily for 6 months, appears to further reduce diastolic, but not systolic, blood pressure (50913). Conflicting results have been reported with other maritime pine products. A small clinical study in adults with untreated, mild hypertension shows that taking a different standardized extract of maritime pine (Oligopin, DRT Group), 75 mg twice daily for 5 weeks, does not lower systolic or diastolic blood pressure when compared with placebo (97407). Also, a small clinical study in obese patients with prehypertension or hypertension shows that taking a different maritime pine bark extract (Toyo-FVG, Toyo Bio-Pharma) 200 mg daily for 12 weeks does not lower systolic or diastolic blood pressure when compared with placebo (50919). Results of meta-analyses are also contradictory. An analysis of 7 clinical trials using maritime pine bark extract 90-200 mg daily for 2-24 weeks shows no significant effect overall on systolic or diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, or pulse pressure (103609). However, an analysis of 12 trials using doses of 60-200 mg daily for 4-24 weeks shows a mean reduction of about 3 mmHg in systolic blood pressure, and about 2 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure. There was high heterogeneity between the studies, and the effect on diastolic blood pressure was only seen with a treatment duration of at least 12 weeks (103610).
• Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. Oral maritime pine bark extract has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small observational registry study in males less than 65 years old with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia has found that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 50 mg three times daily in combination with gotu kola (Centellicum; Horphag Research) 225 mg three times daily for 8 months is associated with a modest improvement in Karnofsky Performance Scale scores and a reduction in fatigue when compared with pirfenidone (108862). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the unblinded, non-randomized nature of the study.
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with IBS. Details: An observational registry study in adults with idiopathic IBS found that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg daily for 4 weeks, in conjunction with standard treatment, is associated with reduced abdominal pain, cramps, and the use of medical care and rescue medications when compared to standard treatment alone. In both groups, standard treatment included specific nutritional recommendations and Buscopan Compositum, hyoscine-N-butylbromide, or acetaminophen for pain relief (97402). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the unblinded, non-randomized nature of the study.
• Jet lag. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract can prevent or treat jet leg. Details: An observational registry study found that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg daily for up to 10 days, starting 3 days before a plane flight, is associated with reduced signs and symptoms of jet lag when compared to control (97437). Additionally, a small clinical study shows that taking this extract 50 mg three times daily for 7 days, starting 2 days before a plane flight, reduces jet lag symptoms and the average duration of symptoms by a little over 1 day when compared with placebo (97412).
• Leg cramps. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial for leg cramps. Details: A small clinical study in patients experiencing at least 4 episodes of leg cramps per week associated with athletic activity, venous insufficiency, or an unknown cause shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 200 mg daily for 4 weeks may decrease the incidence of leg cramps when compared to baseline (15524). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Male infertility. Although there has been interest in using oral maritime pine for male infertility, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of maritime pine for this purpose.
• Melasma. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial for melasma. Details: A small clinical study in females with melasma shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 75 mg twice daily for 60 days, along with topical application of sunscreen during the day and a triple cream containing hydroquinone, tretinoin, and fluocinolone at night, improves scores related to melasma severity and aesthetics, but not quality of life, when compared with placebo plus sunscreen and triple cream (105782).
• Meniere disease. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with Meniere disease. Details: Observational registry research in patients with Meniere disease found that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg daily along with standard treatment is associated with a greater reduction in the severity of tinnitus and the number of work-days lost when compared with standard treatment alone. After 6 months of treatment, about 87% of patients taking maritime pine bark were asymptomatic, compared to about 35% of patients receiving standard treatment alone (97413). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the unblinded, non-randomized nature of the study.
• Menopausal symptoms. Small clinical studies suggest that oral maritime pine bark extract might improve some menopausal symptoms. Details: Several small clinical studies in patients with menopausal symptoms shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 60-200 mg daily for 2-6 months modestly reduces perimenopausal symptoms, including tiredness, headache, depression and anxiety, sleep disturbances, vaginal dryness, hot flashes, and loss of memory, when compared with placebo or control (14899,50927,50945).
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with metabolic syndrome. Details: A small clinical study in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 50 mg three times daily for 6 months lowers triglyceride levels by 46 mg/dL, increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by about 10 mg/dL, reduces fasting plasma glucose by 18 mg/dL, and lowers systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 7 mmHg and 5 mmHg, respectively, when compared to baseline. The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of statistical comparison to a control group. Taking the maritime pine bark extract was also associated with a reduction in the percentage of patients presenting with five risk factors of metabolic syndrome (91960).
• Oral mucositis. It is unclear if topical maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in children with chemotherapy-related oral mucositis. Details: A small clinical study in children 6-15 years of age with chemotherapy-related oral mucositis shows that application of a solution containing a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 1 mg/kg in three divided doses daily for one week promotes complete healing in 58% of patients and improved healing in 38% of patients. This improvement was significantly greater than treatment with glycerine solution and similar to treatment with vitamin E solution (91964).
• Osteopenia. It is unclear if maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with osteopenia. Details: A small clinical study in postmenopausal adults with osteopenia shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Oligopin, DRT Group) 150 mg daily for 12 weeks improves markers of bone turnover when compared with placebo (105783). It is unknown if maritime pine bark extract improves bone mineral density or reduces the risk of fractures in patients with osteopenia.
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with Parkinson disease. Details: Two small observational studies in adults with mild to moderate Parkinson disease suggest that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg daily for 4 or 8 weeks in conjunction with carbidopa/levodopa therapy is associated with a reduction in scores for tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity when compared with carbidopa/levodopa therapy alone. Maritime pine is also associated with an increase in the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale score from approximately 75 (cares for self, unable to carry on normal activity or do active work) to approximately 85 (normal activity with effort, some signs or symptoms of disease), compared with little to no change from a score of around 75 in the control group (103614,112716).
• Pregnancy-related pain. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial for reducing pain during the third trimester of pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study in patients in the third trimester of pregnancy shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 30 mg daily modestly reduces lower back pain, hip joint pain, pelvic pain, and pain due to varicose veins or calf cramps when compared with a control group (15423).
• Psoriasis. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with psoriasis. Details: An observational registry study in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis found that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg daily for 12 weeks along with standard treatment is associated with improved quality of life, increased water and moisture content of the skin, reduced plaque severity and total affected body area, and reduced use of corticosteroids when compared with standard treatment alone (97417). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the unblinded, non-randomized nature of the study.
• Raynaud syndrome. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with Raynaud syndrome. Details: A small clinical study in females with mild, primary Raynaud syndrome shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 50 mg twice daily for 4 weeks decreases coldness, burning pain, paresthesias, skin color changes, and low temperature areas of the hands when compared with lifestyle changes alone. The lowest finger temperature increased by 30% in those taking this product, compared with 13% in those implementing lifestyle changes alone (103615).
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). It is unclear if oral maritime pine is beneficial for RLS. Details: A small observational study in adults with RLS suggests that taking maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg daily along with standard management (i.e., regular sleep, exercise, vitamin C, B vitamins, proper footwear, and instruction on diet and posture) improves self-reported symptoms associated with RLS when compared to baseline. Maritime pine bark may also be associated with less analgesic use compared with standard management alone (112717). However, the interpretation of these findings, other than analgesic use, is limited by lack of a statistical comparison to the other study group.
• Sarcopenia. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with sarcopenia. Details: Observational registry research in adults over 70 years of age with signs of muscle loss has found that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg daily along with strength training for 2 months improves hand grip strength, walking distance, total weight lifted, number of steps climbed, and general fitness scores when compared with strength training alone (97404). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the unblinded, non-randomized nature of the study.
• Sexual dysfunction. Oral maritime pine bark extract has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in females with sexual dysfunction shows that taking a specific combination tablet (Lady Prelox, Horphag Research) containing a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 20 mg, L-arginine 200 mg, L-citrulline 200 mg, and a standardized rose hip extract (Rosvita) orally 50 mg daily for 8 weeks, in combination with a management program consisting of lifestyle, diet, exercise, and stress control changes, improves overall sexual function when compared with the management program alone (91963). Taking the same product in a dose of 2 tablets twice daily for 8 weeks, in addition to the lifestyle management program, improves vaginal dryness in pre- and post-menopausal patients when compared with lifestyle management alone (103611). The effect of maritime pine alone on sexual dysfunction is unclear.
• Sjogren syndrome. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with Sjogren syndrome. Details: A very small observational study in patients with Sjogren syndrome found that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg daily in addition to standard therapy is associated with a reduction in dry eye, dry mouth, and the need for corticosteroids when compared with standard therapy alone (100360).
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with SLE. Details: A very small clinical study in adults with SLE shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 120 mg daily for 30 days, followed by 60 mg daily for 30 days, modestly reduces symptoms of SLE in some patients when compared with control (50851).
• Traumatic brain injury (TBI). It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with TBI. Details: A clinical study in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with TBI shows that administering a standardized maritime pine bark extract (Oligopin, DRT Group) 50 mg three times daily with enteral nutrition for 10 days improves scores on the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and APACHE II [Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II], as well as nutritional status, when compared with placebo. At day 28, survival rate was 86% in the treatment group, compared to 71% in the placebo group; however, this difference was not statistically significant (108861).
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with recurrent UTIs or interstitial cystitis. Details: An observational registry study in adults aged 30-40 years with a recent history of recurrent UTIs has found that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg daily for 2 months is associated with a normal urinalysis in 92% of patients, compared with 68% of those who received no supplementation (108860). Another observational registry study in patients with recurrent UTIs or interstitial cystitis has found that taking this same dose for 2 months is associated with a normal urinalysis in 100% of patients, compared with 35% of patients who took oral cranberry extract 400 mg daily and 36% of those who received no treatment (108859). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the unblinded, non-randomized nature of these studies.
• Varicose veins. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract is beneficial in patients with varicose veins. Details: Observational registry research in postpartum adults has found that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 50 mg daily for 6 months, in addition to using below-knee compression stockings, is associated with reduced edema, leg cramps, total number of varicose veins, and number of visible spider vein clusters when compared with compression stockings alone (97403). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the unblinded, non-randomized nature of the study.
• Venous thromboembolism (VTE). While some conflicting evidence exists, low-quality clinical research suggests that oral maritime pine bark extract might prevent superficial thrombosis during flights and reduce the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in patients with a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Details: Observational registry research has found that a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 150 mg daily for 10 days is not associated with reduced occurrence of DVT, a type of VTE, when compared with compression stockings or control (97437). However, an older clinical study in patients at moderate or high risk for thrombotic events shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 200 mg 2-3 hours before a flight seems to reduce superficial thrombosis, but not DVT risk, when compared with placebo (50874). Some observational research also has also found that taking standardized maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) is associated with reduced post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and recurrent DVT (100355). Also, some clinical research shows that taking standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) daily for one year, while wearing or not wearing compression stockings, reduces the incidence of PTS in patients with a single prior episode of DVT (50925). Maritime bark has also been studied in combination with other natural products. There is some evidence that taking a specific combination product (Flite Tabs, Aidan Products) before a flight and then again 6 hours later might decrease the risk of DVT during long-haul plane flights in high-risk patients. The product combines a blend of 150 mg of standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) plus nattokinase (12075).
• Wrinkled skin. It is unclear if oral maritime pine bark extract can reduce wrinkles or improve skin health in people with significant sun exposure. Details: A small crossover study in Chinese adults working outdoors shows that taking a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 50 mg twice daily for 12 weeks improves skin hydration and reduces transepidermal water loss and skin darkening when compared with placebo (105784). More evidence is needed to rate maritime pine for these uses.

(Read more about MARITIME PINE)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Pellagra. Oral niacinamide is approved for the treatment of pellagra and niacin deficiency. Details: Niacinamide is FDA-approved for the prevention and treatment of niacin deficiency and pellagra. Niacinamide is sometimes preferred over niacin for this indication because it lacks the vasodilating and flushing effects of niacin (15,6243).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Acne. Topical niacinamide seems to improve acne symptoms in some patients. Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One clinical study shows that applying niacinamide 4% gel twice daily for 8 weeks is as effective as clindamycin 1% gel for reducing the number and severity of acne lesions. The niacinamide gel appears to be more effective in patients with oily skin than those with non-oily skin (93360). Other preliminary clinical research in adults with mild to moderate acne vulgaris shows that applying niacinamide 5% cream twice daily, 10 minutes after applying benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel, for 12 weeks reduces the number of acne lesions, but not erythema or inflammation, when compared with benzoyl peroxide alone (107711). Niacinamide has also been studied in combination with other ingredients. In preliminary clinical research, oral niacinamide has been reported to improve acne when used in combination with zinc, copper, and folic acid (Nicomide) (25557), or in combination with azelaic acid, zinc, pyridoxine, copper, and folic acid (NicAzel, Elorac Inc.) (90800). In a small observational study, topical niacinamide 4% combined with gallic acid 1% and lauric acid 1% was associated with some improvement in acne (104931). It is unclear if the effects in these studies are due to niacinamide, other ingredients, or the combinations.
• Diabetes. Oral niacinamide does not seem to prevent the onset of type 1 diabetes, although it might slow its progression. Details: Although some older research has suggested that taking high-dose niacinamide can reduce the risk of type 1 diabetes in high-risk children (4874), results from higher quality, more rigorous clinical trials show that taking niacinamide up to 3 grams daily for 5 years does not prevent the onset of type 1 diabetes in first-degree relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes (4875,25553,25554). However, taking niacinamide 1.2 grams/m2 daily for 5 years may prevent the loss of beta-cell function in these patients (25555). Also, there is evidence showing that niacinamide can preserve residual beta-cell function in patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes (4877,4878,4879,4880,25556). Clinical trials, including one placebo-controlled trial and one vitamin E-comparison study, show niacinamide can prolong the "honeymoon period" in those newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, when the pancreas is still capable of producing some insulin (4877,4878,4879,4880,25556). However, some scientists have raised concerns about potential induction of insulin resistance with short-term use of niacinamide 2 grams daily for 2 weeks (4881). Niacinamide has also been evaluated in adults with type 2 diabetes. A small clinical study in lean patients with type 2 diabetes who failed sulfonylurea therapy shows that taking niacinamide 500 mg three times daily for 6 months in addition to continuing insulin or a sulfonylurea increases C-peptide release and improves insulin secretion when compared with insulin alone (4882).
• Hyperphosphatemia. Adding oral niacinamide to standard treatment with phosphate binders further lowers blood levels of phosphorus in patients on hemodialysis. Details: A meta-analysis of nine small clinical trials in patients on hemodialysis with hyperphosphatemia who are using a phosphate binder shows that taking niacinamide 250-1500 mg daily for 2-6 months lowers serum phosphorus and parathyroid hormone levels when compared with placebo (98940) Another meta-analysis of two small clinical trials in the same patient population also shows that taking niacinamide, titrated from 500 mg to 1500 mg daily over 8 weeks, reduces serum phosphorus levels by about 0.9 mg/dL when compared with placebo (94188). Other clinical research in this population shows that taking modified-release niacinamide 250-1500 mg orally daily for 12-24 weeks also lowers serum phosphate and parathyroid levels when compared with placebo. However, these effects were not maintained at 40-52 weeks follow-up (107709,110499). In addition, this product was not compared with immediate-release niacinamide. Niacinamide has also been studied in place of phosphate binders. One small clinical study in patients on hemodialysis with hyperphosphatemia shows that taking niacinamide 500-1750 mg daily for 12 weeks, beginning 2 weeks after discontinuation of phosphate binders, decreases serum phosphorus levels by 1.5 mg/dL and intact parathyroid hormone levels by 50 pg/mL, without affecting calcium levels, when compared to baseline (25561).The validity of these findings is limited due to the lack of a control group.
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. Oral niacinamide might reduce the rate of nonmelanoma skin cancer development. Details: One clinical study in patients with a history of nonmelanoma skin cancers shows that taking niacinamide 500 mg orally twice daily for 12 months reduces the rate of new nonmelanoma skin cancers at 12 months by 23% and the number of actinic keratoses by 13% when compared with placebo (93362). Other clinical research shows that taking niacinamide (Nature's Own, Virginia) 500 mg orally once or twice daily for 4 months reduces the total number of actinic keratoses by up to 35% and decreases the odds of developing at least one nonmelanoma skin cancer by 86% when compared with placebo in patients with at least four actinic keratoses (93365). However, some conflicting research exists. One small clinical study in adults with actinic keratoses shows that taking niacinamide 500 mg twice daily for 120 days does not reduce the number of actinic keratoses when compared with control. However, the validity of this study is limited by the short study duration (107714). A meta-analysis of many small clinical trials shows that using niacinamide, up to 2000 mg orally or 4% topically, daily for 1 month to 5 years lowers the risk of skin cancer, including basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by 50% when compared with control. Using niacinamide did not reduce the risk of actinic keratoses. However, the validity of this study is limited by inclusion of populations with different cancer risks and high heterogeneity (110497).
• Osteoarthritis. Oral high-dose niacinamide might be beneficial for improving osteoarthritis symptoms. Details: Clinical research in patients with osteoarthritis shows that taking niacinamide 3 grams daily in six divided doses for 12 weeks improves joint flexibility, reduces inflammation, and modestly decreases use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) when compared with placebo (4883).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Brain tumor. Adding high-dose oral niacinamide to chemotherapy does not seem to improve survival in patients with brain tumors. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with surgically resected brain tumors shows that treatment with radiotherapy, niacinamide, and carbogen does not improve survival when compared with radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy plus carbogen (11695,11696).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. Although there is interest in using oral niacinamide for age-related cognitive decline, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacinamide for this purpose.
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study in patients with early-stage age-related maculopathy shows that taking a combination of niacinamide 18 mg, vitamin E 20 mg, and lutein 15 mg daily for nearly a year improves retinal function when compared with no treatment (60134). It is unclear if this effect is due to niacinamide, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Aging skin. It is unclear if topical niacinamide improves symptoms of aging skin. Details: A small study in females with signs of facial photo-aging shows that applying niacinamide 5% cream to half of the face twice daily for 12 weeks improves blotchiness, the appearance of wrinkles, skin elasticity, and skin pigmentation when compared with applying placebo cream to the other half of the face (25551).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if topical niacinamide improves eczema symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients with atopic dermatitis and dry skin shows that applying niacinamide 2% cream twice daily for 8 weeks decreases skin water loss and improves skin hydration when compared with using a white petrolatum moisturizer (25560).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other vitamins; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children with ADHD shows that taking a maximum of niacinamide 3 grams, ascorbic acid 3 grams, calcium pantothenate 1.2 grams, and pyridoxine 600 mg daily for 3 months seems to improve behavior in 29% of participants when compared with baseline (9957). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Bladder cancer. Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with carbogen for improving survival in advanced bladder cancer; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A phase II clinical study in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer shows that adding inhaled carbogen and oral niacinamide 40-60 mg/kg about 2 hours before radiotherapy shows a trend to improved survival at 3 years when compared with inhaled carbogen and radiotherapy (25558), and a larger phase III study shows that carbogen and oral niacinamide improves 3-year survival by about 13% when compared with radiotherapy alone (93366). An observational follow-up of the phase III study found a trend to increased survival at 5 years in the carbogen and niacinamide group when compared with radiotherapy alone. And in a subgroup of patients with tumor necrosis, the 5-year survival was significantly greater with carbogen and niacinamide when compared with radiotherapy alone (93356). It is unclear if these effects are due to niacinamide, carbogen, or the combination.
• Child growth. It is unclear if oral niacinamide improves child growth. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children in rural Tanzania shows that supplementing niacinamide orally from birth to 18 months of age does not improve length-for-age, weight-for-age, or head circumference when compared with control. Niacinamide was initially supplemented to breast-feeding mothers, 250 mg daily, until 6 months of age, followed by 100 mg daily taken by the child until 18 months of age (107713).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral niacinamide is beneficial for COVID-19. Details: Observational research in adults with acute kidney injury secondary to coronavirus disease-19 infection has found that taking niacinamide 1000 mg orally daily for 7 days is associated with a 55% lower risk of mortality when compared with control. However, taking niacinamide was not associated with a lower risk of renal replacement therapy (110500).
• Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). It is unclear if topical niacinamide is beneficial for CLE. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with discoid lupus erythematosus, a type of CLE, shows that applying topical niacinamide 2% to 4% twice daily for 12 weeks modestly improves lesion scores, but not quality of life scores, when compared with placebo. However, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (110498).
• Depression. Although there is interest in using oral niacinamide for depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacinamide for this condition.
• Diabetic neuropathy. Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with diabetic polyneuropathy shows that taking a specific combination product (Cytoflavin, Polysan) containing niacinamide, inosine, riboflavin, and succinate daily for 12 weeks improves symptom scores, including paresthesia and numbness scores, when compared with placebo. The therapy was administered intravenously, containing niacinamide 20 mg, inosine 40 mg, riboflavin 4 mg, and succinate 200 mg, for 10 days followed by orally, containing niacinamide 50 mg, inosine 100 mg, riboflavin 10 mg and succinate 600 mg, for the remainder of the study (110503).
• Erythema. Topical niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: There is interest in using niacinamide to reduce the side effects of topical tretinoin, including erythema. A small preliminary clinical study in patients using isotretinoin for acne shows that applying a specific cream (Sebiaclear Hydra, SVr Laboratoire Dermatologique) containing niacinamide 5% and omega-ceramides 8% twice daily for 6 months reduces isotretinoin-induced erythema, dryness, and itching of the skin when compared with a glycerin placebo (98938). It is not clear if this effect is due to niacinamide, omega-ceramides, or the combination.
• Head and neck cancer. Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with carbogen for improving survival in laryngeal cancer; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A phase III clinical trial in patients with laryngeal cancer shows that treatment with accelerated radiotherapy plus carbogen and niacinamide 60 mg/kg taken orally 1-1.5 hours prior to each fraction of radiation improves local tumor control, but does not improve overall survival or 5-year disease-free survival, when compared with accelerated radiotherapy alone. In a subgroup of patients with hypoxic tumors, anemia, or high expression of epidermal growth factor receptor, receiving niacinamide and carbogen seems to improve both survival and tumor control when compared with radiotherapy alone (93358,93359,93363).
• Melasma. It is unclear if topical niacinamide improves uneven skin pigmentation. Details: A small clinical study in Japanese females with uneven facial hyperpigmentation shows that applying niacinamide 5% moisturizer to the face twice daily reduces hyperpigmentation and increases skin lightness after 4 weeks when compared with placebo moisturizer. However, further improvements are not observed after another 4 weeks of treatment (25552). Another small clinical study in Korean females with uneven facial hyperpigmentation shows that applying a moisturizer containing niacinamide 2% plus tranexamic acid 2% (Regederm RX White Project, Aestura) twice daily for 8 weeks reduces skin pigmentation by about 9% when compared with a placebo cream (93361).
• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is unclear if adding oral niacinamide to chemotherapy reduces relapses of refractory lymphoma. Details: One small clinical study in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma shows that 24% of patients achieve complete or partial remission and 57% achieve disease stabilization when compared with baseline, following treatment with vorinostat 400 mg daily and niacinamide titrated from 20 mg/kg to 100 mg/kg over the first 14 days of a 21-day cycle for up to 18 cycles (93355). It is unclear how these outcomes compare to using vorinostat alone, or to other control treatments.
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral niacinamide is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with NAFLD and diabetes shows that taking a specific niacinamide product (Nature's Life) 1000 mg orally daily for 12 weeks does not improve liver function tests, liver steatosis, or liver fibrosis when compared with no intervention. However, some quality of life domain scores were moderately improved. However, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (110502).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Although there is interest in using oral niacinamide for PMS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacinamide for this condition.
• Pruritus. It is unclear if oral niacinamide reduces pruritus in patients with kidney failure. Details: A small clinical study in patients with pruritus due to kidney failure shows that taking niacinamide sodium 500 mg twice daily for 4 weeks does not reduce pruritus severity when compared with placebo (93364). This study is limited due to small size and short study duration.
• Psoriasis. It is unclear if oral niacinamide is beneficial for psoriasis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with mild to moderate psoriasis shows that applying niacinamide 4% cream topically twice daily for 12 weeks improves psoriasis scores by 31% when compared with baseline. The validity of these results is limited by the lack of a comparator group (110501).
• Rosacea. Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that 71% of adult and adolescent patients with rosacea who take a combination product (Nicomide) containing niacinamide 750 mg, zinc 25 mg, copper 1.5 mg, and folic acid 500 mcg once or twice daily report improvement in appearance after 4 weeks when compared to baseline (25557). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Schizophrenia. Although there is interest in using oral niacinamide for schizophrenia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacinamide for this condition.
• Seborrheic dermatitis. It is unclear if topical niacinamide is beneficial for reducing seborrheic dermatitis symptoms. Details: One small clinical study in patients with seborrheic dermatitis shows that applying niacinamide 4% cream once daily for 12 weeks reduces the severity of symptoms such as redness and scaling by 75%, compared with a 35% reduction when using a placebo cream (93357). More evidence is needed to rate niacinamide for these uses.

(Read more about NIACINAMIDE)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Cystic fibrosis. Long-term nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride improves lung function and reduces pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis show that, when taken along with a bronchodilator and other standard therapies, nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride in concentrations of 3% to 7%, up to 10 mL twice daily for 4 weeks, increases forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) when compared with isotonic saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) (26230,26230). This benefit was not seen at 48 weeks. Other clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis shows that inhaling sodium chloride 7%, 4 mL twice daily for 48 weeks, does not improve FEV1 when compared with isotonic saline. However, chronic treatment with hypertonic saline does reduce the number of pulmonary exacerbations and increase the number of patients without pulmonary exacerbations when compared with isotonic saline (29402). It is not clear if this benefit occurs in children with cystic fibrosis. The Pulmonary Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends that individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 6 years or older use nebulized hypertonic saline long-term to improve lung function, reduce the number of exacerbations, and improve quality of life (29403).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity. Oral sodium chloride seems to prevent nephrotoxicity associated with use of amphotericin B. Details: Clinical research shows that administering oral or intravenous sodium chloride 150 mEq daily during treatment with amphotericin B can attenuate the rise in serum creatinine levels and preserve renal function when compared to treatment with amphotericin B alone (26226).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in preventing lithium level fluctuations in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A moderate-sized open-label clinical study in adults with type I bipolar disorder receiving lithium carbonate shows that taking sodium chloride 1 gram daily for 12 weeks along with dietary salt restriction of 1 gram daily reduces the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L, but does not significantly affect serum sodium, potassium, aldosterone, or creatinine levels when compared with controls who were not salt restricted, but were advised not to consume additional salt at the table (112909). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by missing data in both groups.
• Canker sores. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for canker sores, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Congestive heart failure. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in patients with acute decompensated heart failure requiring decongestive therapy with diuretics. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure requiring high-dose intravenous furosemide shows that taking sodium chloride 2 grams three times daily for up to 96 hours does not affect patient weight or serum creatinine levels when compared with placebo (112911). However, the clinical relevance of this study is unclear and it may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Conjunctivitis. Although there is interest in using ophthalmic sodium chloride for conjunctivitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Hyponatremia. Although there is interest in using oral sodium chloride for hyponatremia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral sodium chloride for this condition.
• Pharyngitis. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for pharyngitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial for premature infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in infants born at less than 32 weeks' gestation shows that adding sodium 4 mEq/kg daily to enteral feedings, starting from the 7th day after birth and continuing through the 35th day, reduces the risk of developing hyponatremia and improves weight gain when compared with adding water (98180). A small, open-label clinical study in newborns less than 35 weeks gestation shows that high sodium intake, defined as an average of 0.25% sodium in maintenance fluids, for 48 hours on day 2 and 3 after birth results in less weight loss within the first 72 hours of life when compared with control, but does not improve mortality, length of hospital stay, or complications from prematurity (112908). However, interpretation of these findings is limited by varied concentrations of sodium as an intervention. More evidence is needed to rate sodium for these uses.

(Read more about SODIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately (13161,14306,14307,14308,15655,15752,17187,92271,92274,103247)(103250,108898). However, cocoa naturally contains caffeine, and caffeine may be unsafe when used orally in doses of more than 400 mg daily (11733,98806). While most cocoa products contain only small amounts of caffeine (about 2-35 mg per serving) (2708,3900), one cup of unsweetened, dry cocoa powder can contain up to 198 mg of caffeine (100515). To be on the safe side, cocoa should be used in amounts that provide less than 400 mg of caffeine daily. Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine naturally found in ingredients such as cocoa does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product. Cocoa and dark chocolate products worldwide also contain heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. In the US, one ounce (approximately 28 grams) of most commercially available dark chocolate products tested contained levels of lead and/or cadmium above the maximum allowable dose level for California, with cadmium levels generally increasing with the percentage of cocoa (109847,109848,109849). Advise patients to consume cocoa in moderation. ...when used topically. Cocoa butter is used extensively as a base for ointments and suppositories and is generally considered safe (11).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when dark chocolate is used orally. Cocoa and dark chocolate products worldwide contain heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. In the US, one ounce (approximately 28 grams) of most commercially available dark chocolate products tested contained levels of lead and/or cadmium above the maximum allowable dose level for California, with cadmium levels generally increasing with the percentage of cocoa (109847,109848,109849). Children are at increased risk of adverse effects from intake of lead and/or cadmium. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of other chocolate-based products that typically contain smaller quantities of cocoa.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally in moderate amounts. However, due to the caffeine content of cocoa preparations, intake should be closely monitored during pregnancy to ensure moderate consumption. Fetal blood concentrations of caffeine approximate maternal concentrations (4260). Some research has found that intrauterine exposure to even modest amounts of caffeine, based on maternal blood levels during the first trimester, is associated with a shorter stature in children ages 4-8 years (109846). While many cocoa products contain only small amounts of caffeine (about 2-35 mg per serving) (2708,3900), unsweetened, dry cocoa powder can contain up to 198 mg of caffeine per cup (100515). According to a review by Health Canada, and a subsequent large meta-analysis conducted in the US, doses of up to 300 mg daily can be consumed during pregnancy without an increased risk of spontaneous abortion, still birth, preterm birth, fetal growth retardation, or congenital malformations (11733,98806). To be on the safe side, cocoa should be used in amounts that provide less than 300 mg of caffeine daily. Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine found in ingredients such as cocoa, which naturally contains caffeine, does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in large amounts. Caffeine found in cocoa crosses the placenta producing fetal blood concentrations similar to maternal levels (4260). Consumption of caffeine in amounts over 300 mg daily is associated with a significantly increased risk of miscarriage in some studies (16014,98806). Additionally, high intake of caffeine during pregnancy have been associated with premature delivery, low birth weight, and loss of the fetus (6). While many cocoa products contain only small amounts of caffeine (about 2-35 mg per serving) (2708,3900), unsweetened, dry cocoa powder can contain up to 198 mg of caffeine per cup (100515). To be on the safe side, cocoa should be used in amounts that provide less than 300 mg of caffeine daily (2708). Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine found in ingredients such as cocoa, which naturally contains caffeine, does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product. Cocoa and dark chocolate products worldwide also contain heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. In the US, one ounce (approximately 28 grams) of most commercially available dark chocolate products tested contained levels of lead and/or cadmium above the maximum allowable dose level for California, with cadmium levels generally increasing with the percentage of cocoa (109847,109848,109849). Large doses or excessive intake of cocoa should be avoided during pregnancy.

LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used in moderate amounts or in amounts commonly found in foods. Due to the caffeine content of cocoa preparations, intake should be closely monitored while breastfeeding. During lactation, breast milk concentrations of caffeine are thought to be approximately 50% of serum concentrations. Moderate consumption of cocoa would likely result in very small amounts of caffeine exposure to a nursing infant (6). Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine found in ingredients such as cocoa, which naturally contains caffeine, does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in large amounts. Consumption of excess chocolate (16 oz per day) may cause irritability and increased bowel activity in the infant (6026). Cocoa and dark chocolate products worldwide also contain heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. In the US, one ounce (approximately 28 grams) of most commercially available dark chocolate products tested contained levels of lead and/or cadmium above the maximum allowable dose level for California, with cadmium levels generally increasing with the percentage of cocoa (109847,109848,109849). Large doses or excessive intake of cocoa should be avoided during lactation.

(Read more about COCOA)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Hawthorn preparations in doses of up to 1800 mg daily seem to be safe when used for up to 16 weeks. Although hawthorn might be safe for long-term use, current studies have not evaluated safety past 16 weeks (8279,8280,8281,10144,17203,104689). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of hawthorn when used topically.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about HAWTHORN)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. A standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) has been safely used in doses of 50-450 mg daily for up to one year (2435,2451,2462,2554,2556,7693,10214,10416,12012,14899) (15424,15521,15522,15523,15524,100359,105782). The same extract has also been used with apparent safety in a dose of 800 mg daily for 16 days (103617). A different standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Oligopin, DRT Group) has been used with apparent safety in doses of up to 150 mg daily for up to 12 weeks (105781,105783). ...when applied topically as a cream or powder. A standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 0.5% cream has been used for up to 7 days (50912). Powder from a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 100 mg has been applied to the skin daily for up to 6 weeks (50887,50896).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately, short-term. A standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research), administered in a dose of 1 mg/lb body weight daily, has been safely used in a clinical study of children aged 6-18 years for up to 3 months (13120).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally during the third trimester of pregnancy. In one small clinical study, a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) has been used at a dose of 30 mg daily with apparent safety during the third trimester of pregnancy (15423). However, more evidence is needed; use cautiously or avoid using.

LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available regarding the safety of maritime pine when used during lactation; avoid using.

(Read more about MARITIME PINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when prescription products are used orally and appropriately (12033). ...when niacinamide supplements are taken orally in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) set by the Institute of Medicine (IOM). The UL of niacinamide is 30 mg daily for adults 18 years of age and 35 mg daily for adults 19 years and older (6243).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally in doses greater than 30 mg but less than 900 mg daily. The European Food Safety Authority has set the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of niacinamide at 900 mg daily (104937). However, oral niacinamide has been safely used in doses up to 1500 mg daily for 12 weeks in some clinical trials (25561,94188,98940,107709,110502). ...when used topically and appropriately for up to 12 weeks (5940,93360,110498,110501).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Niacinamide has been safely used in children for up to 7 years in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) (4874,9957). The UL of niacinamide for children by age is: 1-3 years, 10 mg daily; 4-8 years, 15 mg daily; 9-13 years, 20 mg daily; 14-18 years, 30 mg daily (6243).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts that do not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for niacinamide. The UL of niacinamide during pregnancy and lactation is 30 mg daily for those 14-18 years of age and 35 mg daily for those 19 years and older (6243). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of larger oral doses of niacinamide or topical niacinamide; avoid using.

(Read more about NIACINAMIDE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher doses can be safely used therapeutically with appropriate medical monitoring (26226,26227).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid exceeding the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension and increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (26229,98176,98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,100310,109395,109396,109398,109399). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sodium when used topically.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (26229,100310). Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid prolonged use of doses exceeding the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension (26229).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in higher doses. Higher intake can cause hypertension (100310). Also, both the highest and the lowest pre-pregnancy sodium quintile intakes are associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia, and the delivery of small for gestational age (SGA) infants when compared to the middle intake quintile (106264).

(Read more about SODIUM)

ACE INHIBITORS (ACEIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking cocoa with ACEIs might increase the risk of adverse effects.  Details Human research shows that dark chocolate can inhibit ACE (42112). Additionally, prolonged angioedema in an elderly patient on an ACE inhibitor was precipitated with intake of diabetic chocolate (42049).

ADENOSINE (Adenocard) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cocoa might decrease the vasodilatory effects of adenosine and interfere with its use prior to stress testing.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine is a competitive inhibitor of adenosine at the cellular level. However, caffeine does not seem to affect supplemental adenosine because high interstitial levels of adenosine overcome the antagonistic effects of caffeine. It is recommended that methylxanthines and methylxanthine-containing products be stopped 24 hours prior to pharmacological stress tests. However, methylxanthines appear more likely to interfere with dipyridamole than adenosine-induced stress testing (11771).

ALCOHOL (Ethanol) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Alcohol reduces caffeine metabolism. Concomitant use of alcohol can increase caffeine serum concentrations and the risk of caffeine adverse effects (6370).

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa may increase the risk of bleeding if used with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.  Details Clinical research shows that intake of cocoa can inhibit platelet adhesion, aggregation, and activity (6085,17076,41928,41948,41957,41958,41995,42014,42070,42145)(111526) and increase aspirin-induced bleeding time (23800). For patients on dual antiplatelet therapy, cocoa may enhance the inhibitory effect of clopidogrel, but not aspirin, on platelet aggregation (111526).

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking cocoa with antihypertensive drugs might increase the risk of hypotension.  Details Clinical research shows that cocoa can modestly decrease blood pressure in hypertensive and normotensive patients (13166,14306,15655,15752,17187,42059,42092,42107,42137,42143)(42169,103249,109446).

BETA-ADRENERGIC AGONISTS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, large amounts of cocoa might increase the cardiac inotropic effects of beta-agonists.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Theoretically, large amounts of caffeine might increase cardiac inotropic effects of beta-agonists (15). A case of atrial fibrillation associated with consumption of large quantities of chocolate in a patient with chronic albuterol inhalation abuse has also been reported (42075).

CIMETIDINE (Tagamet) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the effects and adverse effects of caffeine in cocoa.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Cimetidine decreases caffeine clearance by 30% to 50% (15,506).

CONTRACEPTIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the effects and adverse effects of caffeine found in cocoa.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Oral contraceptives decrease the rate of caffeine clearance by 40% to 65% (2714,11737).

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) INHIBITORS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) (3941,5051,11741,23557,23573,23580,24958,24959,24960,24962), (24964,24965,24967,24968,24969,24971,38081,48603). Theoretically, drugs that inhibit CYP1A2 may decrease the clearance rate of caffeine from cocoa and increase caffeine levels.

DIPYRIDAMOLE (Persantine) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cocoa might decrease the vasodilatory effects of dipyridamole and interfere with its use prior to stress testing.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine may inhibit dipyridamole-induced vasodilation (11770,11772). It is recommended that methylxanthines and methylxanthine-containing products be stopped 24 hours prior to pharmacological stress tests (11770). Methylxanthines appear more likely to interfere with dipyridamole than adenosine-induced stress testing (11771).

DISULFIRAM (Antabuse) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, disulfiram might increase the risk of adverse effects from caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. In human research, disulfiram decreases the rate of caffeine clearance (11840).

DIURETIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, using cocoa with diuretic drugs might increase the risk of hypokalemia.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. In excessive amounts, caffeine can reduce potassium levels due to stimulation of the sodium-potassium pump (23579,37905,37953,38003,38034). Diuretics can also cause lower potassium levels.

EPHEDRINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk for stimulant adverse effects.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. There is evidence that using ephedrine with caffeine might increase the risk of serious life-threatening or debilitating adverse effects such as hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, seizures, and death (1275,6486,10307).

ESTROGENS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, estrogens might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Estrogen inhibits caffeine metabolism (2714).

FLUCONAZOLE (Diflucan) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, fluconazole might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Fluconazole decreases caffeine clearance by approximately 25% (11022).

FLUTAMIDE (Eulexin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa might increase the levels and adverse effects of flutamide.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. In vitro evidence suggests that caffeine can inhibit the metabolism of flutamide (23553).

FLUVOXAMINE (Luvox) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, fluvoxamine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Fluvoxamine reduces caffeine metabolism (6370).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, abrupt cocoa withdrawal might increase the levels and adverse effects of lithium.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. There are two case reports of lithium tremor that worsened upon abrupt coffee withdrawal (609,610).

METHOXSALEN (Oxsoralen) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, methoxsalen might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Methoxsalen can reduce caffeine metabolism (23572).

METMORPHIN (Glucophage) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, metformin might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that metformin can reduce caffeine metabolism (23571).

MEXILETINE (Mexitil) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, mexiletine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Mexiletine can decrease caffeine elimination by 50% (1260,11741). Concomitant use might increase the effects and adverse effects of caffeine in cocoa.

MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITORS (MAOIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk of a hypertensive crisis.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Large amounts of caffeine with MAOIs might precipitate a hypertensive crisis (15).

NICOTINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk of hypertension.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Concomitant use of caffeine and nicotine has been shown to have additive cardiovascular effects, including increased heart rate and blood pressure. Blood pressure was increased by 10.8/12.4 mmHg when the agents were used concomitantly (36549).

PENTOBARBITAL (Nembutal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cocoa might decrease the effects of pentobarbital.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine might negate the hypnotic effects of pentobarbital (13742).

PHENOBARBITAL (Luminal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa might reduce the effects of phenobarbital and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of phenobarbital (23558,23559,23561). The exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

PHENOTHIAZINES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, phenothiazines might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Phenothiazines can reduce the metabolism of caffeine by inhibiting cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) (23573,23574).

PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, phenylpropanolamine might increase the risk of hypertension, as well as the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Concomitant use of phenylpropanolamine and caffeine might cause an additive increase in blood pressure (11738). Phenylpropanolamine also seems to increase caffeine serum levels (13743).

PHENYTOIN (Dilantin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa might reduce the effects of phenytoin and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of phenytoin (23559,23561). The effect does not seem to be related to the seizure threshold-lowering effects of caffeine. However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, quinolone antibiotics might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Quinolones (also referred to as fluoroquinolones) decrease caffeine clearance (606,607,608).

RILUZOLE (Rilutek) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the levels and adverse effects of both caffeine and riluzole.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine and riluzole are both metabolized by cytochrome P450 1A2, and concomitant use might reduce metabolism of one or both agents (11739).

STIMULANT DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, concomitant use might increase stimulant adverse effects.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Concomitant use might increase the risk of stimulant adverse effects (11832).

TERBINAFINE (Lamisil) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, terbinafine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Terbinafine decreases the rate of caffeine clearance (11740).

THEOPHYLLINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cocoa might increase the levels and adverse effects of theophylline.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Large amounts of caffeine might inhibit theophylline metabolism (11741). Caffeine decreases theophylline clearance 23% to 29% (506).

TIAGABINE (Gabitril) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa tea might increase the levels and adverse effects of tiagabine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that chronic caffeine administration can increase the serum concentrations of tiagabine. However, concomitant use does not seem to reduce the antiepileptic effects of tiagabine (23561).

TICLOPIDINE (Ticlid) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, ticlopidine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. In vitro evidence suggests that ticlopidine can inhibit caffeine metabolism (23557). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

VALPROATE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa might reduce the effects of valproate and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of valproate (23558,23559,23561,37882). However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, verapamil might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Verapamil increases plasma caffeine concentrations by 25% (11741).

(Read more about COCOA)

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, hawthorn may increase the risk of bleeding if used with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.  Details In vitro and animal research shows that hawthorn can inhibit platelet aggregation (95528,95529,95530,95531). However, its effect in humans is unclear. One observational study shows that patients taking hawthorn shortly before undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or valve replacement surgery have a 10% incidence of postoperative bleeding, compared with 1% in those who never consumed hawthorn extract (95527). However, clinical research shows that taking a specific preparation of dried hawthorn leaves and flowers (Crataesor, Soria Natural Lab) 800 mg three times daily for 15 days does not affect platelet aggregation or levels of thromboxane B2, the metabolite of thromboxane A2, in healthy humans (54664).

BETA-BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might cause additive effects on blood pressure and heart rate.  Details Some evidence shows that hawthorn might lower blood pressure and heart rate (12595,19245).

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might cause additive coronary vasodilation and hypotensive effects.  Details Some evidence shows that hawthorn might lower blood pressure due to vasodilatory effects (12595,19245).

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, hawthorn might potentiate the effects and adverse effects of digoxin.  Details Hawthorn appears to improve cardiac output (12595); however, hawthorn does not appear to affect digoxin pharmacokinetics (19249).

NITRATES Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might cause additive coronary vasodilatory effects.  Details Some evidence shows that hawthorn might lower blood pressure due to vasodilatory effects (12595,19245).

PHOSPHODIESTERASE-5 INHIBITORS Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might result in additive vasodilation and hypotension.  Details Hawthorn might inhibit PDE-5 and cause vasodilation (12595).

(Read more about HAWTHORN)

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, maritime pine bark extract might increase the risk of bleeding when used with antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs.  Details Clinical research suggests that maritime pine bark extract inhibits platelet aggregation (3283,50844,50942). However, the clinical significance of this effect is unclear.

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, maritime pine bark extract might increase the risk of hypoglycemia when used with antidiabetes drugs.  Details One clinical study shows that maritime pine bark extract decreases blood sugar in patients with diabetes being treated with antidiabetes agents (15522). Monitor blood glucose levels closely. Dose adjustments might be necessary.

IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, maritime pine bark extract might decrease the effectiveness of immunosuppressant therapy.  Details In vitro and animal research suggests that maritime pine bark extract has immunostimulant activity (2435,2636). This effect has not been reported in humans.

(Read more about MARITIME PINE)

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, niacinamide may have additive effects when used with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs, especially in patients on hemodialysis.  Details Several cases of thrombocytopenia have been reported for hemodialysis patients treated with niacinamide 1 gram daily. Hemodialysis patients receiving niacinamide had almost a three-fold higher risk of developing thrombocytopenia when compared with those receiving placebo (25563,98940).

CARBAMAZEPINE (Tegretol) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Niacinamide might increase the levels and adverse effects of carbamazepine.  Details Plasma levels of carbamazepine were increased in two children given high-dose niacinamide, 60-80 mg/kg/day. This might be due to inhibition of the cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in carbamazepine metabolism (14506). There is not enough data to determine the clinical significance of this interaction.

PRIMIDONE (Mysoline) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Niacinamide might increase the levels and adverse effects of primidone.  Details Case reports in children suggest niacinamide 60-100 mg/kg/day reduces hepatic metabolism of primidone to phenobarbital, and reduces the overall clearance rate of primidone (14506); however, there is not enough data to determine the clinical significance of this potential interaction.

(Read more about NIACINAMIDE)

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = A Theoretically, a high intake of dietary sodium might reduce the effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs.  Details High intake of dietary sodium can increase systolic and diastolic blood pressure (26222). Also, high intake of sodium may necessitate increased use of antihypertensive medications to achieve blood pressure control in some patients, such as those with chronic kidney disease (26223).

CORTICOSTEROIDS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids with sodium supplements might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids (corticosteroids) cause sodium retention. This effect is dose-related and depends on mineralocorticoid potency. It is most common with hydrocortisone, cortisone, and fludrocortisone, followed by prednisone and prednisolone (4425).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Altering dietary intake of sodium might alter the levels and clinical effects of lithium.  Details High sodium intake can reduce plasma concentrations of lithium by increasing lithium excretion (26225). Reducing sodium intake can significantly increase plasma concentrations of lithium and cause lithium toxicity in patients being treated with lithium carbonate (26224,26225). Stabilizing sodium intake is shown to reduce the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L (112909). Patients taking lithium should avoid significant alterations in their dietary intake of sodium.

SODIUM-CONTAINING DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of sodium-containing drugs with additional sodium from dietary or supplemental sources may increase the risk of hypernatremia and long-term sodium-related complications.  Details The Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams of sodium daily indicates the intake at which it is believed that chronic disease risk increases for the apparently healthy population (100310). Some medications contain high quantities of sodium. When used in conjunction with sodium supplements or high-sodium diets, the CDRR may be exceeded. Additionally, concomitant use may increase the risk for hypernatremia; this risk is highest in the elderly and people with other risk factors for electrolyte disturbances.

TOLVAPTAN (Samsca) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, concomitant use of tolvaptan with sodium might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Tolvaptan is a vasopressin receptor 2 antagonist that is used to increase sodium levels in patients with hyponatremia (29406). Patients taking tolvaptan should use caution with the use of sodium salts such as sodium chloride.

(Read more about SODIUM)

General ...Orally and topically, cocoa is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Borborygmi, constipation, diuresis, gastrointestinal discomfort, headaches, and nausea.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Tachycardia.

Cardiovascular ...Some cases of increased heart rate have been reported with oral cocoa use (13161,42132).

Dermatologic ...In some cases, when taken orally, cocoa can cause allergic skin reactions (13161). Topically, cocoa butter has occasionally caused a rash. In animals, it has been shown to block pores and cause acne; however, this has not been found in humans (11).

Gastrointestinal ...In human trials, chocolate consumption was associated with a higher incidence of flatulence, irritable bowel syndrome, upset stomach, gastric upset, borborygmi (a gurgling noise made by fluid or gas in the intestines), bloating, nausea, vomiting, and constipation or obstipation (41986,42221,41921,1374,42220,1373,42099,42097,42156,42123,18229,42169,42111). Chocolate consumption has been implicated as a provoking factor in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (41974,42005,41946,1374). Unpalatability has been reported (42079,42169). Consumption of chocolate and other sweet foods may lead to increased dental caries (42129,42030).

Genitourinary ...In some cases, when taken orally, cocoa can cause increased urination (13161).

Neurologic/CNS ...In some cases, when taken orally, cocoa can cause shakiness and might trigger migraine and other headaches (13161,42169,92271).

Other ...Due to the high sugar and caloric content of chocolate, there is concern about weight gain in people who consume large amounts of chocolate (17187).

(Read more about COCOA)

General ...Orally, hawthorn seems to be well tolerated when used appropriately. Topically, no adverse effects have been reported, although a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Multiorgan hypersensitivity reactions resulting in acute renal failure have been reported rarely.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, tachycardia (with facial pains) of uncertain relationship to hawthorn was reported in a multicenter clinical trial (54640). Palpitations (19244) were reported in three patients in a large surveillance trial of 3,664 patients with cardiac failure (54692) and in 11 patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) in a literature review of 5,577 patients (19247). Circulation failure has been reported in two patients with CHF in a literature review of 5,577 patients (19247). Incidences of hospitalization, hospitalization due to CHF, worsening of CHF, angina, and atrial fibrillation have also been reported with the use of hawthorn extract WS 1442 (Crataegutt forte), although it is unclear if these events are related to hawthorn supplementation or existing CHF (19222). In clinical trials, chest pain (8281), short-term increases in blood pressure (19240), and other non-specific heart problems (17203) have also been reported following the use of various hawthorn preparations (e.g. WS 1442, Korodin).

Dermatologic ...Orally, erythematous rash has been reported in patients with CHF in a literature review of 5,577 patients (19247). Non-specific rashes and itching (19222,19243) as well as toxiderma from the fruits of hawthorn (54670) have also been reported.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, rare abdominal discomfort of uncertain relationship to hawthorn has been reported in a large clinical trial, surveillance study, and a literature review (19247,54640,54692). Digestive intolerance (19241), diarrhea (19243), flatulence (8281), gastroenteritis (8281), increased bowel movements (19243), obstipation (8281), mild and rare nausea (10144,19247,19244), nutritional and metabolic problems (17203), and other non-specific gastrointestinal effects (19222), have also been reported. Furthermore, gastrointestinal hemorrhage has been reported in two patients with CHF in a literature review of 5,577 patients (19247).

Musculoskeletal ...In clinical trials, arthritis (8281), back pain (8281), weakness (19243), and other non-specific musculoskeletal effects (19222) have been reported following the use of various hawthorn preparations g. WS 1442, CKBM-A01).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, headache and dizziness/vertigo were reported in two patients in a large surveillance trial of 3,664 patients with cardiac failure (54692), in 15 patients with CHF as reported in a literature review of 5,577 patients (19247), and in a varying number of clinical trial participants (8281,19222,19244). Incidences of fainting (19222), fever (17203), and infrequent, mild and transient sleepiness have also been reported (19221,54692).

Psychiatric ...Orally, agitation was reported in a large surveillance trial of 3,664 patients with cardiac failure (54692).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Orally, bronchitis has been reported following the use of hawthorn extract WS 1442 (8281).

Renal ...A case of multiorgan hypersensitivity reaction and acute renal failure following the consumption of C. orientalis has been reported (54654).

Other ...Flu-like syndrome (8281) and other non-specific infections have been reported following the use of the hawthorn extract WS 1442 (17203,19222). Hawthorn has also been reported to cause nosebleeds (8281,10144).

(Read more about HAWTHORN)

General ...Orally and topically, maritime pine bark extract seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Gastrointestinal complaints, dizziness, and vertigo.

Cardiovascular ...A single case of chest pain has been reported for a patient treated with a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research). However, the patient had a history of myocardial infarction (50905). Another patient taking the same maritime pine bark extract experienced acute decompensation of heart failure. The patient previously has stable coronary artery disease (50929). It is not clear if either of these adverse effects were directly related to maritime pine bark extract.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) may cause gastrointestinal problems (15521,15522,17300,50891,50942). Also, mouth ulcer and bad breath have been reported in a single trial (15521).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, a standardized extract of maritime pine bark (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) may cause dizziness and severe vertigo (15521,15522,17300,50904,50933). Also, headache has been reported in a single trial (15521).

(Read more about MARITIME PINE)

General ...Orally, niacinamide is well tolerated in amounts typically found in food. When used topically and orally in higher doses, niacinamide seems to be generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Dizziness, drowsiness, itching, gastrointestinal disturbances, headache, and rash.
Topically: Burning sensation, itching, and mild dermatitis.

Dermatologic ...Orally, large doses of niacinamide are associated with occasional reports of rashes, itching, and acanthosis nigricans (4880,11695,11697,14504,107709). Topically, application of niacinamide in a cream has been reported to cause a burning sensation, itching and pruritus, crusting, and mild dermatitis (93357,93360,110501,110498).

Endocrine ...Orally, niacinamide in high doses, 50 mg/kg daily, has been associated with modestly higher insulin requirements in patients with type 1 diabetes, when compared with taking niacinamide 25 mg/kg daily. Theoretically, high-dose niacinamide might increase insulin resistance, although to a lesser extent than niacin (4881,14512).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, large doses of niacinamide can cause gastrointestinal disturbances including nausea, vomiting, heartburn, anorexia, epigastric pain, flatulence, and diarrhea (6243,11694,11695,11696,11697,107709).

Hematologic ...Orally, niacinamide supplementation might increase the risk for thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing hemodialysis (98940,107709). A meta-analysis of small clinical studies shows that taking niacinamide during hemodialysis to reduce phosphate levels is associated with a 2.8-fold increased risk for thrombocytopenia when compared with placebo. In one of the included studies, platelet levels returned to normal within 20 days after niacinamide discontinuation (98940).

Hepatic ...Orally, older reports of elevated liver function tests with high doses of niacinamide (3 grams or more daily) have raised concerns about liver toxicity. However, newer studies have not reported this concern; it is possible that some of these cases were due to contamination with niacin (4880,11694,11695,14503).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, large doses of niacinamide can cause dizziness, drowsiness, and headaches (11694,11695,11696,11697,107709).

(Read more about NIACINAMIDE)

General ...Orally, sodium is well tolerated when used in moderation at intakes up to the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level. Topically, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Worsened cardiovascular disease, hypertension, kidney disease.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, intake of sodium above the CDRR intake level can exacerbate hypertension and hypertension-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) (26229,98176,100310,106263). A meta-analysis of observational research has found a linear association between increased sodium intake and increased hypertension risk (109398). Observational research has also found an association between increased sodium salt intake and increased risk of CVD, mortality, and cardiovascular mortality (98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,109395,109396,109399). However, the existing research is unable to confirm a causal relationship between sodium intake and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; high-quality, prospective research is needed to clarify this relationship (100312). As there is no known benefit with increased salt intake that would outweigh the potential increased risk of CVD, advise patients to limit salt intake to no more than the CDRR intake level (100310).
A reduction in sodium intake can lower systolic blood pressure by a small amount in most individuals, and diastolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension (100310,100311,106261). However, post hoc analysis of a small crossover clinical study in White patients suggests that 24-hour blood pressure variability is not affected by high-salt intake compared with low-salt intake (112910). Additionally, the available research is insufficient to confirm that a further reduction in sodium intake below the CDRR intake level will lower the risk for chronic disease (100310,100311). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that reducing sodium intake increases levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides, but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, by a small amount (106261).
It is unclear whether there are safety concerns when sodium is consumed in amounts lower than the adequate intake (AI) levels. Some observational research has found that the lowest levels of sodium intake might be associated with increased risk of death and cardiovascular events (98181,98183). However, this finding has been criticized because some of the studies used inaccurate measures of sodium intake, such as the Kawasaki formula (98177,98178,101259). Some observational research has found that sodium intake based on a single 24-hour urinary measurement is inversely correlated with all-cause mortality (106260). The National Academies Consensus Study Report states that there is insufficient evidence from observational studies to conclude that there are harmful effects from low sodium intake (100310).

Endocrine ...Orally, a meta-analysis of observational research has found that higher sodium intake is associated with an average increase in body mass index (BMI) of 1. 24 kg/m2 and an approximate 5 cm increase in waist circumference (98182). It has been hypothesized that the increase in BMI is related to an increased thirst, resulting in an increased intake of sugary beverages and/or consumption of foods that are high in salt and also high in fat and energy (98182). One large observational study has found that the highest sodium intake is not associated with overweight or obesity when compared to the lowest intake in adolescents aged 12-19 years when intake of energy and sugar-sweetened beverages are considered (106265). However, in children aged 6-11 years, usual sodium intake is positively associated with increased weight and central obesity independently of the intake of energy and/or sugar-sweetened beverages (106265).

Gastrointestinal ...In one case report, severe gastritis and a deep antral ulcer occurred in a patient who consumed 16 grams of sodium chloride in one sitting (25759). Chronic use of high to moderately high amounts of sodium chloride has been associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer (29405).

Musculoskeletal ...Observational research has found that low sodium levels can increase the risk for osteoporosis. One study has found that low plasma sodium levels are associated with an increased risk for osteoporosis. Low levels, which are typically caused by certain disease states or chronic medications, are associated with a more than 2-fold increased odds for osteoporosis and bone fractures (101260).
Conversely, in healthy males on forced bed rest, a high intake of sodium chloride (7.7 mEq/kg daily) seems to exacerbate disuse-induced bone and muscle loss (25760,25761).

Oncologic ...Population research has found that high or moderately high intake of sodium chloride is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer when compared with low sodium chloride intake (29405). Other population research in patients with gastric cancer has found that a high intake of sodium is associated with an approximate 65% increased risk of gastric cancer mortality when compared with a low intake. When zinc intake is taken into consideration, the increased risk of mortality only occurred in those with low zinc intake, but the risk was increased to approximately 2-fold in this sub-population (109400).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...In patients with hypertension, population research has found that sodium excretion is modestly and positively associated with having moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea. This association was not found in normotensive patients (106262).

Renal ...Increased sodium intake has been associated with impaired kidney function in healthy adults. This effect seems to be independent of blood pressure. Observational research has found that a high salt intake over approximately 5 years is associated with a 29% increased risk of developing impaired kidney function when compared with a lower salt intake. In this study, high salt intake was about 2-fold higher than low salt intake (101261).

(Read more about SODIUM)