Veg-E Complete Pro Chocolate by SP Standard Process

EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Oral calcium carbonate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an antacid. Details: Taking calcium carbonate orally as an antacid is effective for treating dyspepsia (1843). Calcium carbonate has FDA approval as an antacid.
• Hyperkalemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities. Details: Administering calcium gluconate intravenously can reverse electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias induced by hyperkalemia (12946). Intravenous calcium gluconate is FDA-approved for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities.
• Hypocalcemia. Oral calcium treats and prevents hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium is used to treat severe hypocalcemia. Details: Taking calcium orally is effective for treating and preventing hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate, acetate, gluceptate, or chloride is effective for severe hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany (12928).
• Kidney failure. Oral calcium carbonate or calcium acetate is used as a phosphate binder during kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium carbonate or calcium acetate orally is effective as a phosphate binder. Calcium acetate (PhosLo) appears to control hyperphosphatemia better than sevelamer (Renagel) (12943,12944,38990). Calcium citrate is not recommended for this purpose because it increases aluminum absorption and does not bind phosphate as efficiently as calcium acetate or calcium carbonate (21631). Some clinical research also shows that taking calcium orally reduces blood pressure in patients with kidney failure (975).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral calcium in combination with vitamin D prevents bone density loss that occurs during long-term treatment with corticosteroids. Details: Taking calcium in combination with vitamin D as adjunctive therapy seems to be effective for reducing bone mineral density loss in people using corticosteroids long-term (982,1046,1830,1831,1832,4462,4463,4464,4465,4466)(4467,12945,38493). One specific product used in clinical research is Oscal (Marion Merrel Dow Inc.), which contains elemental calcium 500 mg per tablet plus vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (982). Another product used is Oscal 250 + D (SmithKline Beecham Healthcare), which contains elemental calcium 250 mg and vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (1046).
• Hyperparathyroidism. Oral calcium reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium orally reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with kidney failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism (1827,1828,1829,39174,39425). In elderly women, the combination of calcium and vitamin D reverses secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces hip fracture risk (8818). Also, population research suggests increased calcium intake from the diet and supplements reduces the risk of primary hyperparathyroidism in women. Supplemental intakes of at least 500 mg/day and dietary intakes of approximately 1100 mg/day are considered to be protective (91353).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate calcium intake, from the diet and/or supplements, is recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate calcium intake in line with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) by age, along with adequate vitamin D intake, for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake when adequate dietary intake is not feasible (109425). In the US and Canada, foods containing at least 200 mg calcium with less phosphorous content than calcium can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate calcium intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (11940,102148). However, calcium supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Also, calcium supplements do not seem to be effective for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) during lactation (988), in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation (1817), or in patients who have had renal transplantation (4823,38736,38871). Maximal bone growth occurs in the teenage years, and then BMD in females remains relatively constant until age 30-40. After age 40, bone loss typically occurs at rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. In males, this occurs several decades later. Bone loss is more pronounced if dietary calcium intake is below the RDA, which is the case for many Americans (2571,2578). One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy children 7-14 years old shows that fortifying food with calcium 250-1000 mg daily for up to 24 months modestly improves femoral neck BMD, but not hip or spine BMD. However, the included trials did not supplement vitamin D (107232). During the 5 years immediately after menopause, calcium supplementation has very little effect on bone loss (2569,2570,2575,2576). The rapid loss of estrogen causes a high bone resorption rate, which increases serum calcium levels and therefore decreases intestinal absorption of calcium (2570). After this period, the typical rate of bone loss is 2% per year (2572,2576). Taking calcium 1000-1600 mg daily as carbonate, citrate, lactate gluconate, or citrate malate salt decreases this rate by 0.25% to 1% annually (977,979,981,2569,2571,2572,2575,2576,2578,6850)(38978,38980,39064). The greatest reductions (1% or more) are seen in the first 1-2 years of supplementation when bone remodeling foci can be filled (2569,2576). After this period, the differences in rate of loss between supplemented and non-supplemented females are closer to 0.25% per year (2569,2577). A meta-analysis of clinical evidence suggests that there is no additional benefit after 4 years (38980). Small clinical studies have found that continuous calcium supplementation at an average daily dose of 1050 mg, started after menopause and continued for 1.5-4 years, may reduce fracture rates by 26% when compared with no calcium supplementation. The largest of these studies was conducted in nursing home residents who also received daily vitamin D; the benefits of calcium, specifically, are unclear (39386). Some research also suggests that calcium and vitamin D improves primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in some older individuals with osteoporosis, particularly the elderly and those who are no longer community dwelling (12930,38875,38849,39026,109471). However, not all research is positive. One large clinical trial in elderly adults with a low-trauma fracture show that taking calcium 1000 mg daily with or without vitamin D 800 IU daily for 2-7 years does not reduce the risk of a second fracture when compared with placebo (13073). Another clinical study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 800 IU daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (less than 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). Also, some exploratory research suggests that supplements may need to be continued indefinitely; in adults over 68 years of age, any effects of 2 years of calcium supplements on BMD appear to be lost within 2 years after discontinuing supplements (6853). Calcium has additive effects when used with other agents such as vitamin D, estrogens, or calcitonin. Whereas calcium alone generally reduces or prevents loss of BMD, combination with other agents can produce small increases in BMD ranging from 0.3% to 3.3% depending on the combination and dosages used (978,980,1836,2570,2571,2572,2576). However, one meta-analysis in healthy adults shows that fortifying foods with calcium 250-1000 mg daily, in conjunction with vitamin D supplementation, for up to 24 months does not improve BMD when compared with control (107232). The full potential of osteoporosis treatments cannot be realized without adequate calcium intake (2569,2570,2571,2572). Advise patients taking agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene (Evista) to ensure that their daily calcium intake meets the RDA. Use supplements if necessary. The usefulness of calcium in preventing osteoporosis in males is not as well-studied. Some observational research has found that calcium 870 mg daily is not associated with changes in BMD and bone loss in males (97201). However, clinical evidence suggests that taking calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years might improve trabecular or cortical bone mass by 2% to 4% (980,8827,8873). Dietary supplementation with calcium and vitamin D seems to moderately reduce bone loss measured in the femoral neck, spine, and total body, and seems to reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in older patients with osteopenia or low BMD (980).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Adequate calcium intake seems to prevent symptoms of PMS. Details: There seems to be a link between low dietary calcium intake and symptoms of PMS (2004,6847,39007). Taking calcium 1000-1336 mg daily seems to significantly reduce depressed mood, water retention, and pain, especially if daily calcium intake is inadequate (1822,1823,1824,2004,95821). Calcium carbonate 1200 mg daily seems to decrease PMS symptom scores by about 18% when compared with placebo (1822). Increasing dietary calcium intake is also associated with a decreased risk of developing PMS. Consuming an average of 1283 mg of calcium per day from foods is associated with about a 30% lower risk of developing PMS compared with consuming an average of 529 mg daily (13094); however, taking calcium supplements does not appear to be associated with the risk of developing PMS.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Oral calcium seems to be beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer, especially in those with adequate vitamin D levels and normal body mass index (BMI). Details: Population studies have found that increased intake of dietary or supplemental calcium is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas (1047,8820,12120,38951,98898,98899). Clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research also show that taking calcium supplements 1.2-2 grams daily for up to 4 years can reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence by up to 29% (970,12118,12950,15267,34596,38718,39042,95817). However, not all research has been positive. Some meta-analyses of clinical research or observational studies suggest that taking calcium does not reduce the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer (34596,39042,39349). Other contradictory research suggests that postmenopausal females who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290); however, this finding may not be reliable due to the high baseline intake of calcium in study participants. The reason for these conflicting findings is not entirely clear. Vitamin D might be an important factor. People with lower than average vitamin D levels do not seem to get any benefit from calcium supplements (12118). Also, one meta-analysis of previous trials suggests that taking calcium 1200 mg daily reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas in people with a normal BMI, but not in those who are overweight or obese (99715). Despite this conflicting evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2005 stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence to support this claim (102366).
• Fetal bone mineralization. If calcium intakes are low during pregnancy, oral calcium seems to be beneficial for increasing fetal bone density. Details: With low dietary calcium intake (less than 562 mg elemental calcium daily) during pregnancy, calcium supplementation increases fetal bone mineralization and density. However, calcium supplementation does not offer any additional benefit if calcium intakes are adequate (3263,3264).
• Hypertension. Oral calcium seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount. However, it is unclear if this reduction is clinically significant. Details: Many clinical trials and observational studies show that intake of calcium supplements or dietary calcium modestly reduces blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension, usually around 1-2 mmHg. Calcium seems to be more effective for certain subpopulations of patients, such as salt-sensitive people and patients with low baseline dietary calcium intake (945,972,974,976,984,1818,1819,1820,1821,6852)(13138,14406,38803,39063,39094,39221). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium intake during pregnancy reduces systolic blood pressure in offspring by 1-2 mmHg (38852). However, a large-scale clinical trial in postmenopausal females shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg daily does not lower blood pressure or reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials shows that taking calcium in combination with vitamin D for up to 7 years has no effect on blood pressure (98861). The validity of this finding is limited by the poor methodological quality of the included studies. Some observational research suggests that calcium can reduce the risk for hypertension. Population research in females aged 45 years and older suggests that higher intake of calcium from both diet and supplement sources is linked to a lower risk of developing hypertension when compared to lower calcium intake (14265). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension. However, the FDA has concluded that this claim is based on supporting, rather than conclusive, evidence (102367).
• Osteomalacia. Oral calcium seems to reverse osteomalacia caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Osteomalacia is commonly caused by vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to osteomalacia in children and adults. Calcium supplementation can reverse osteomalacia caused by calcium deficiency. Along with appropriate vitamin D supplementation, individuals at risk of osteomalacia need sufficient calcium intake (94819).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral calcium seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia in high risk pregnancies, especially if calcium intakes are low. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (971,38756), most clinical research shows that taking calcium orally 1-2 grams daily reduces pregnancy-related hypertension and pre-eclampsia (973,1833,8828,39043,39319,39426,96480). Calcium appears to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia by about 50% when compared with placebo. One meta-analysis of 19 controlled trials involving over 29,000 pregnancies found that for every 19 females treated with calcium, one episode of pre-eclampsia would be avoided (96480). Calcium appears to have the greatest effect in individuals at high-risk of pre-eclampsia or with low calcium levels, and when taken at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation (15029,38497,96480,99714). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding the use of calcium supplements to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. However, due to the limited and conflicting research available at that time, the FDA stated that this outcome was highly unlikely. Since then, large, high-quality clinical research has supported this finding. In fact, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released a recommendation to prescribe oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancies at high risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary calcium intakes are low, in order to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).
• Rickets. Oral calcium seems to reverse rickets caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Rickets is commonly caused be vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to rickets. Calcium supplementation can reverse rickets caused by calcium deficiency (94819). A small clinical study in children with nutritional rickets shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily for 24 weeks improves radiographically measured rickets caused by calcium deficiency. Rickets seems to improve more rapidly with calcium 1000 mg compared to calcium 500 mg. However, increasing the calcium dose to 2000 mg daily is not more beneficial than calcium 1000 mg daily (98904).
• Tooth retention. Oral calcium with vitamin D seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral calcium does not seem to be beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Although some population research disagrees (15631,39041,95811,107237), most research shows that increased calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (15631,16715,98895,107236,107237). Subgroup analyses of population research suggest that calcium intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, adults (15631,107237). Another subgroup analysis in a large meta-analysis of population research also suggests that dietary intake may reduce estrogen receptor(ER)-negative breast cancer, but not ER-positive breast cancer (107236). However, most other research has not evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation or intake on breast cancer subtypes. The best evidence to date, from a large scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years after menopause does not reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer at the end of the study and 5 years after the end of the intervention (16715,98895).
• Fractures. Although oral calcium prevents fractures in osteoporosis, most evidence shows that calcium does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis discussion for more information on the use of calcium for this purpose. Details: The most recent and robust meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium supplementation with or without vitamin D is NOT associated with reduced fractures in older adults without osteoporosis (95822). A large-scale study in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years suggests calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D 400 IU daily for 7 years only modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) and does not significantly reduce fracture risk. This lack of effect may have been due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. In those who were 80% adherent, the combination of calcium plus vitamin D reduced the risk of hip fracture by about 29% (14282). Also, some clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 5 years does not attenuate loss of height after menopause when compared with placebo (95810). Additional meta-analyses of clinical and observational evidence suggest that calcium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, such as hip fractures (38589,38888,98895). Some other research has suggested that calcium in combination with vitamin D reduces fracture risk in older patients without osteoporosis (980,1836,8818,12930,12933,12952,38849,102145,107235); however, this research is confounded by a number of variables, including the presence of hormonal therapy and differing levels of fracture risk at baseline (1836,8818,95822). Conflicting findings on this topic might also be due to genetic differences in patient populations. A population analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study found that, in older females with the lowest genetic susceptibility to low bone mineral density (BMD), taking calcium with vitamin D is associated with a reduction in fracture risk. However, in females with a higher genetic susceptibility to low BMD, there is no association between supplementation and fracture risk. This might be because individuals with a lower susceptibility to low BMD are also more responsive to calcium and vitamin D supplementation (97357). As of April 2018, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with vitamin D >400 IU daily along with calcium >1000 mg daily is safe and effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture. USPSTF recommends against supplementing with calcium 1000 mg daily or less along with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal females (95695).
• Obesity. Oral calcium does not seem to improve weight loss. Details: Observational research has found that adults and children with low calcium intake are more likely to gain weight, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and be overweight or obese when compared to people with high calcium intake (12124,12125,12126,12127,14265). Additional observational research has found that increasing calcium intake is associated with weight loss in females; the results in males have been conflicting (12127,15602,15603). Despite these findings from observational research and a few small clinical studies (12128,15397,14438,98905), most clinical research has found that increased calcium intake does not increase weight loss (12052,13138,15396,15399,38985,39004,97356). The most recent meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies shows that daily dietary and supplemental calcium intake that meets the dietary reference intake (DRI) of 1000 mg or more daily does not increase weight loss in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when compared with intake below the DRI (95813). An older meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials also shows that increased dietary and supplemental calcium intake does not increase weight loss (15605).
• Overall mortality. Oral calcium does not seem to reduce overall mortality. Details: While some population research has found that calcium taken in combination with vitamin D in older females is associated with a lower risk of death (97353), most evidence shows that calcium, with or without vitamin D, has no effect on all-cause mortality (93533,97308).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral calcium does not reduce the risk of developing CVD and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Clinical research shows that calcium does not decrease CVD risk. Several separate meta-analyses of clinical and population research involving over 50,000 patients show that taking calcium 600-1200 mg daily for up to 7 years does not reduce the risk of CVD-related outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or overall mortality (39018,91350,92994,93533,97308,98902,107231,107233). No association was found between total dietary or supplemental calcium intake with or without vitamin D and the risk of CVD or mortality (91350,93533,97308). In fact, some population and clinical research has found that when calcium is used alone or with vitamin D, there is an INCREASED risk of CVD and coronary heart disease (38077,107233). However, other clinical research disagrees (93533). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease by 1.1-1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Intravenous calcium does not prevent nerve pain in patients given oxaliplatin. Oral calcium has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: While pooled analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials suggest that calcium and magnesium infusion decreases the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials shows that the infusion has no effect in preventing neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). Additionally, clinical trials show that administering calcium gluconate 1 gram with magnesium sulfate 1 gram intravenously immediately before, or before and after, the administration of a single oxaliplatin cycle (90005), or over the entire 6-cycle course of oxaliplatin, does not improve symptoms of neurotoxicity when compared with placebo (96474).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral calcium does not prevent MI. When taken in the absence of vitamin D, oral calcium may increase the risk of MI. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of calcium is associated with a decreased risk of MI (91350). However, a 2010 meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking calcium at a dose of at least 500 mg daily is associated with an approximate 30% INCREASE in the risk of MI in patients over the age of 40. According to this analysis, one additional case of MI will occur for every 69 patients that take calcium for 5 years (17482). A more recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of MI by 1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research studied postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233) In contrast, other meta-analyses of clinical research have shown that taking calcium for up to 7 years is NOT associated with an increased risk of MI, including a meta-analysis that only included postmenopausal females (93533,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI in postmenopausal females (93533). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for alcohol use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 800 mg and vitamin D 200 IU orally daily for 14 days modestly reduces alcohol craving scores and withdrawal scores when compared with placebo in adults with alcohol dependence that are undergoing withdrawal. Taking calcium carbonate did not reduce the need for diazepam; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (107234).
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for atherosclerosis. Details: A population study has found that taking calcium 1.2 grams daily for 3 years has no effect on carotid intima thickness or carotid atherosclerosis incidence. A total calcium intake (dietary and supplemental) of at least 1794 mg daily in older females may be associated with a decreased risk of carotid atherosclerosis when compared with a total calcium intake below 1010 mg daily (97351).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the odds of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. Details: A small observational study found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a 52% reduced odds of an autism spectrum disorder in the offspring (98900).
• Cancer. Oral calcium alone does not seem to prevent cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Taking calcium alone does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of cancer (12118,15629). The role of calcium in cancer prevention when taken along with vitamin D is controversial, as conflicting results exist. One clinical trial shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1400-1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1100 IU daily have a 60% lower relative risk for developing cancer of any type. Approximately 25 postmenopausal females would need to take this combination for 4 years to prevent one occurrence of cancer (15629). However, a more recent clinical study shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of cancer at 4 years (93943). Reasons for the disparate results are not entirely clear. The discrepancies do not appear to be related to baseline vitamin D levels or different study populations. It is possible that, given the 10-year time lapse between the two publications, the discrepancies result from differences in cancer detection capability. Also, since cancer risk was a secondary outcome measure in the earlier study and a primary outcome measure in the more recent study, it is possible that the discrepancies result from differences in statistical methodologies. The effect of vitamin D and calcium on cancer risk in males and younger patients is not known. There is also interest in using calcium for reducing the risk of hematological malignancies. An analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU for up to 10 years is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of hematologic malignancies when compared with placebo. However, no effect on hematologic malignancy related mortality was seen (97354).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between a higher dietary intake of calcium and the risk of depression when compared with a lower dietary intake of calcium (96480).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for type 2 diabetes prevention. Details: Some population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet or supplements, alone or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713,96473). However, population research is often limited by confounding variables. For example, one analysis found that any beneficial effect might be influenced by concomitant magnesium intake (96473). Furthermore, other population research has found that serum calcium levels higher than 9.6 mg/dL are associated with greater risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults with osteoporosis. This study is limited because it was not determined whether increased serum calcium was due to increased calcium intake or another factor such as parathyroid function (95815).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing pain associated with dysmenorrhea. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg with vitamin D 5000 IU daily for three menstrual cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (95821). However, calcium carbonate 1000 mg taken alone seems to reduce pain when compared with placebo.
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but dietary calcium does not seem to have any effect (38893).
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing falls. Details: Research suggests that calcium in combination with vitamin D, but not calcium alone, might prevent falls by decreasing body sway and normalizing systolic blood pressure (6362,11939,39038). Some experts think the combination of calcium and vitamin D may be important (11916). Preliminary clinical research in adults residing in a health care facility shows that taking vitamin D supplements while increasing dietary calcium and protein for 2 years reduces falls by 11% when compared with standard diets. Intervention diets were supplemented with milk, yogurt, and cheese to provide calcium 1142 mg and protein 69 grams daily (107235). There might also be different effects in females compared to males. In one study, females aged 65 years or older who took vitamin D 700 IU plus calcium citrate 500 mg daily over a 3-year period had a 46% lower risk of falling. However, this combination did not decrease falls in males (14291).
• Fluorosis. Oral calcium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking calcium orally, in combination with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and vitamin D, seems to be effective for reducing excessive fluoride levels in children and improving symptoms of fluorosis in children aged 6-12 years (990).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral calcium in combination with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing heart failure. Details: Based on a secondary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), taking calcium 1000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily does not reduce the risk of heart failure in the overall population or in individuals at high risk. However, in a subgroup of postmenopausal females without risk factors for heart failure, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of developing heart failure by about 37% (97307).
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for hypercholesterolemia. Details: Some evidence shows that taking calcium carbonate 400 mg three times daily reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4% and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 4% after 6 weeks of treatment when used in combination with a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) (2557). In contrast, a study in females with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 800 mg daily for 2 years might INCREASE total cholesterol levels by about 12 mg/dL when compared with placebo. This same study showed an association between calcium supplementation and an increase in total cholesterol levels and carotid intimal thickness in postmenopausal females, but not premenopausal females (97350). A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials which included both healthy patients and patients with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily and vitamin D 200-7142 IU daily modestly improves HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplementation is more effective in patients with dyslipidemia at baseline. It is unclear if this effect is due to calcium, vitamin D, or the combination (107227). However, other research shows that taking a specific supplement containing calcium 600 mg plus vitamin D 200 IU (Caltrate 600 D, Wyeth Consumer Healthcare Inc.) twice daily in combination with calorie restriction does not reduce total or LDL cholesterol levels when compared with placebo (15601).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing blood levels of lead. Details: Lead is mobilized along with calcium from bone during pregnancy and lactation, resulting in increased serum concentrations of lead. One clinical study suggests that calcium supplementation does not significantly decrease these elevated lead concentrations (1586). However, another clinical study suggests that taking calcium reduces blood lead levels by 11% when compared with placebo, with greatest effects observed in those with high baseline levels of lead (38957).
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral calcium for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of calcium for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium alone or with vitamin D is beneficial for metabolic syndrome prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet and supplements alone, or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713).
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing nephrotic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium 500-1000 mg daily for 3 months in combination with vitamin D3 60,000 IU daily or weekly for 4 weeks has no effect on bone mineral density or the risk of relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (97355).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking calcium alone or with vitamin D3 1000 IU daily reduced the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but had no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma (104622).
• Oral mucositis. When used in combination with fluoride treatments, a calcium phosphate mouth rinse seems to prevent and reduce mucositis-related pain in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that using a particular mouth rinse (Caphosol, EUSA Pharma) containing calcium phosphate, in combination with fluoride treatments, reduces days of mucositis, the duration of pain, and the dose and days of morphine used when compared with placebo and fluoride treatment (38611).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: An older meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (38792). However, a more recent pooled analysis of 15 cohort and case-control studies has found that the highest intake of dietary or dairy calcium is associated with a 20% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared to the lowest intake (97349).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing postpartum depression risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium 2 grams daily beginning at 11-21 weeks gestation reduces depression at 12 weeks postpartum when compared with placebo. However, no benefit is seen at 6 weeks postpartum (39447).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing leg cramps during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking calcium 1 gram twice daily (as a mixture of salts) for 2 weeks can reduce pregnancy-related leg cramps during the second half of pregnancy when compared with no treatment (2567).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily might decrease the risk of developing prostate cancer (14133). However, some epidemiological research suggests that consuming very high doses of calcium, over 2000 mg daily, might actually increase the risk of developing prostate cancer (14134). Some epidemiological research also suggests that doses greater than 1500 mg daily increase the risk of poorly differentiated, clinically advanced, and fatal prostate cancer (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer (98894). However, contradictory research suggests that there is no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall risk of prostate cancer (14131,14132,104630).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Some population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke (4822,38678). However, other population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is not associated with a decreased risk of stroke (91350). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years does not affect the risk of stroke when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females, and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Vertigo. Oral calcium with vitamin D might reduce positional vertigo; the effect of calcium when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking calcium 500 mg and vitamin D 400 IU twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate calcium for these uses.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

EFFECTIVE

• Anemia of chronic disease. Oral and intravenous iron in combination with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are effective for treating anemia of chronic disease. Details: Iron supplementation with ESAs is effective for treating anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or chemotherapy. During therapy with ESAs, iron levels should be monitored and supplementation provided as needed to ensure that the response is not limited by lack of iron for erythropoiesis (1087,1091,20110,20111,110192). Research shows that intravenous iron appears to be more effective than oral supplements for this purpose (20112,20113). In patients with CKD, intravenous iron at total doses from 2232 mg over 6 months to 1020 mg over one week increases hemoglobin levels more than oral doses of 4-6 mg/kg daily or 325 mg daily for up to 6 months (20112). Some research has evaluated the effect of intravenous or oral iron in patients not treated with ESAs. In patients with cancer or CKD, oral iron supplements have been shown to improve iron status (110184,110192). However, overall benefits of iron alone remain unclear in treated or untreated patients with cancer and more research is needed to rule out an increase in mortality and to determine any effect on blood transfusion requirements (110192). Preliminary clinical research shows that children aged 6 months to 10 years with HIV and anemia who take elemental iron 3 mg/kg daily along with a multivitamin for 3 months have a 41% lower chance of having persistent anemia at 3 months when compared with multivitamins alone (95432).
• Iron deficiency anemia. Oral and intravenous iron are effective for treating or preventing iron deficiency anemia. The benefits of iron supplementation in people with iron deficiency without anemia are unclear. Details: Oral iron supplements, mainly as ferrous sulfate, are effective for treating and preventing iron deficiency anemia in adults, children, and infants (1089,7135,17495,17496,17497,103806,20114,20115,91183,96621)(104680,104681,112601). Other forms are also effective, including sodium iron ethylenediaminetetra-acetate (NaFeEDTA), iron(III)-hydroxide polymaltose complex (IPC), iron protein succinylate, iron bisglycinate, and lactoferrin with iron (20117,20118,110189). Treatment with iron supplements should increase hemoglobin levels by 1 gram/dL every 2-3 weeks. However, even after hemoglobin has normalized, it may take up to 4 months for iron stores to be replenished (17497). Historically, treatment of iron deficiency anemia with oral iron supplements has typically consisted of a daily dosing regimen, often taken in divided doses to reduce adverse effects. In more recent years, however, intermittent iron supplementation (1-3 doses/week) has become preferred for some patients, particularly those with mild anemia, due to better absorption and a possible reduction in side effects compared to daily dosing. One small clinical study shows that taking ferrous sulfate 60 mg on alternate days in single doses improves iron absorption when compared to once daily dosing (96630). Another small clinical study in females with iron-deficiency anemia shows that fractional iron absorption is 40% to 50% higher with alternate-day dosing compared with daily dosing. Furthermore, total iron absorption was shown to be similar for alternate day dosing of elemental iron 200 mg compared with daily dosing of 100 mg, but the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects may be lower for the alternate day dosing regimen (101514). A meta-analysis of 25 clinical trials, including 10,996 menstruating females with or without pre-existing iron deficiency and/or anemia, shows that intermittent iron reduces the risk of anemia and increases hemoglobin and serum ferritin when compared with placebo or no intervention. This meta-analysis did not identify differences in the risk of anemia, hemoglobin, or serum ferritin between intermittent and daily iron supplementation. However, it did show that females receiving intermittent dosing had a 59% reduction in the risk for adverse effects. The validity of these findings is limited by significant heterogeneity in the enrolled populations and selected dosing strategies, including frequency of intermittent dosing, total weekly dose, and duration of follow-up. In addition, the subgroup analyses performed by baseline anemia, hemoglobin, and serum ferritin, as well as duration of follow-up, showed differing overall conclusions when comparing intermittent and daily iron supplementation. While intermittent dosing appears to be beneficial when compared with daily dosing for some patients with iron deficiency anemia, intermittent dosing may be less effective than daily iron supplementation in some patients (103806). For patients with severe anemia, twice daily dosing may be preferred to alternate day dosing due to faster response. A small clinical study in patients with iron deficiency anemia shows that taking ferrous sulfate 200 mg twice daily is more effective at increasing hemoglobin levels by 3 weeks when compared with ferrous sulfate 400 mg taken on alternate days in single doses (102864). Intermittent iron supplementation has also been investigated in children. A meta-analysis of clinical research in children and adolescents with or without pre-existing iron deficiency and/or anemia shows that taking iron supplements 1-2 times weekly is similarly effective as 3-7 times weekly for decreasing iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia. However, ferritin and hemoglobin levels increased to a greater extent with 3-7 times weekly supplementation (112601). Blood transfusion may be required for some patients with severe iron deficiency anemia who have symptoms such as dyspnea and fatigue (17497). Intravenous iron should be considered in patients who cannot tolerate oral iron or in patients with chronic bleeding or intestinal malabsorption (17497). Guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology recommend treatment with iron while awaiting investigations to rule out gastrointestinal issues in adults in the absence of an alternative explanation. The guidelines recommend ferrous sulfate, fumarate, or gluconate as one tablet daily. If adverse effects occur, intake can be reduced to once every other day, or alternative oral or parenteral sources of iron can be used. Parenteral sources should be used if oral sources are contraindicated or ineffective. Treatment should be monitored and continued after hemoglobin levels are normalized (110193). Iron supplementation may also be beneficial in patients with iron deficiency without anemia, which can cause fatigue and reduced well-being, although guidelines are lacking. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in adults with iron deficiency but not anemia shows that supplemental iron improves iron stores and hemoglobin levels. In addition, iron moderately reduces self-reported fatigue, but not physical capacity, when compared with placebo. Oral ferrous sulfate was used in most studies included in the analysis; however, intravenous or intramuscular iron were also used (104684).
• Pregnancy-related iron deficiency. Oral iron is effective for preventing pregnancy-related iron deficiency. Details: Clinical research shows that taking iron orally at an average daily dose of 20-225 mg of elemental iron increases maternal hemoglobin levels by up to 1 gram/dL when compared with placebo and reduces the risk of maternal anemia by 62% to 100% (20122,20123,20124,110180,110188). Some clinicians may recommend alternating days of iron administration to reduce gastrointestinal adverse effects. A pooled analysis shows that taking iron supplements on alternating days during pregnancy maintains adequate iron intake and reduces gastrointestinal adverse effects when compared with taking iron daily (96625). Various forms of oral iron seem to be equally effective for raising hemoglobin levels (110185,110188). However, in patients with anemia during pregnancy, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose were more effective than oral ferrous sulfate for improving hemoglobin levels (110185).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Breath-holding attacks. Oral iron seems to be effective for reducing the frequency of breath-holding attacks in children with iron deficiency. Details: The incidence of breath-holding attacks is increased in children with iron deficiency or iron deficiency anemia. Most research shows that oral supplementation with ferrous sulfate 3-6 mg/kg daily for 4-16 weeks reduces the frequency of breath-holding attacks in children aged 1-72 months (20128,104682,104683). The best evidence comes from a meta-analysis of one randomized controlled trial and 11 observational single arm studies (104682). In this analysis, approximately 84% of children experienced at least a 50% decreased frequency of breath-holding attacks (104682). Some preliminary clinical research also shows that administering intramuscular iron reduces the frequency of breath-holding attacks and increases remission in children with iron deficiency anemia (20128).
• Cognitive function. Oral iron seems to be effective for improving cognitive function in children and adolescents with iron deficiency. Details: Taking iron orally seems to improve cognitive function in iron-deficient children and adolescents (20121,112600). For example, ferrous sulfate 650 mg twice daily for 8 weeks improved verbal learning and memory in non-anemic iron-deficient adolescent females (1095). Ferrous sulfate 50 mg twice weekly for 16 weeks appeared to improve attention measures in adolescent females with possible anemia (91186). Iron also appears to reverse developmental and learning deficits caused by iron-deficiency in anemic infants (1104). Some clinical research is focused on children and adolescents from low- and middle-income countries. In children aged 5-19 years with or without iron-deficiency anemia, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that iron supplementation for 3-8 months dose-dependently improves measured intelligence by a modest amount. However, there was no effect on other measures of cognition, including attention or memory (110181). Another meta-analysis of clinical research in school age children shows that taking iron for 2-12 months modestly improves intelligence, attention, and memory, but not educational achievement, when compared with placebo or no intervention. However, sub-analyses show that any benefits are limited to children with anemia (112600).
• Heart failure. Intravenous iron seems to be effective for improving recovery in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency. It is unclear if oral iron is effective. Details: Iron deficiency is common in patients with heart failure (17499,112597,112598,112599). Individual clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research in patients with heart failure show that administering intravenous iron, as ferric carboxymaltose, iron dextran, iron isomaltoside, or iron sucrose, for at least 12 weeks modestly improves quality of life, increases exercise capacity, and reduces hospitalizations when compared with placebo or standard care. However, there was no effect on all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality (17498,91179,110176,110187,112597,112598,112599). Some individual clinical trials have used intravenous ferric carboxymaltose 200 mg or iron sucrose 200 mg in patients with mild or moderate heart failure and iron deficiency (17498,91179). Guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology suggest that treatment with parenteral iron improves symptoms and quality of life in patients with functional iron deficiency related to CHF (110193). Limited research has investigated the effect of oral iron in this population. A small meta-analysis of clinical research shows with low certainty that taking iron orally has beneficial effects on serum ferritin and left ventricular ejection fraction (110178). Most research shows that taking oral iron does not improve hemoglobin levels, quality of life, or exercise capacity when compared with placebo (100970,110178). However, one small clinical trial shows that taking oral iron modestly improves iron status and overall symptoms and increases the 6-minute walking distance by about 46 meters, compared with a reduction of only 14 meters in those taking placebo (110183). Some doses used in individual clinical studies have included iron polysaccharide 150 mg twice daily for 16 weeks and ferrous sulfate 200 mg three times daily for 12 weeks (100970,110183).
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). Oral and intravenous iron seem to be beneficial for RLS. The American Academy of Neurology recommends a combination of oral ferrous sulfate and vitamin C or intravenous ferric carboxymaltose for patients with RLS. Details: RLS is commonly associated with iron deficiency anemia. Some clinical research shows that taking iron in the form of ferrous sulfate 325 mg twice daily for 12 weeks reduces RLS symptoms comparably to pramipexole. Symptoms such as leg discomfort, need to move, and sleep disturbances improved considerably in about half of the patients taking either treatment (91181). Additional clinical research shows that taking ferrous sulfate 325 mg twice daily along with vitamin C 100 mg twice daily for 12 weeks reduces symptoms of RLS when compared with vitamin C alone in patients with RLS and low-normal serum ferritin levels (94189). Based on these results, clinical practice guidelines by the American Academy of Neurology report that taking this combination of oral ferrous sulfate and vitamin C is likely to improve symptoms in patients with RLS and low-normal serum ferritin (93587). Intravenous iron may also reduce symptoms of RLS. Clinical practice guidelines by the American Academy of Neurology report that two doses of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose 500 mg given 5 days apart are likely to improve symptoms and quality of life within 28 days in patients with moderate to severe RLS, regardless of serum ferritin levels. Intravenous iron sucrose has also been evaluated in patients with RLS, but there is currently insufficient available evidence to support or refute the use of this form of iron for treating RLS (93587).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral iron does not seem to improve athletic performance. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in adults of childbearing age shows that iron supplementation improves some exercise performance measures, such as maximal oxygen uptake capacity, but not others, such as time until exhaustion and energy consumption, when compared with control (91184). Another meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with iron deficiency without anemia shows that iron supplementation improves subjective measures of fatigue, but does not improve exercise time to exhaustion or other measures of physical capacity (104684). A small clinical study in healthy children shows that taking iron supplements or consuming food providing iron 30-200 mg daily for 1-2 months improves running performance when compared with placebo. This was demonstrated by reductions of heart rate of 6.6 to 8 beats per minute during the running exercise. One preliminary study included in this analysis also showed that iron supplementation improved treadmill endurance time (20140).
• Child growth. Oral iron does not seem to be beneficial for child growth. Details: Meta-analyses of mainly preliminary clinical research show that oral iron supplementation, at doses averaging 2-80 mg or 1-10 mg/kg elemental iron daily for up to 52 weeks, does not increase growth rate in children (20131,20132,20133,95434).
• Preterm labor. Oral iron does not seem to prevent preterm labor and may actually increase the risk in malaria-endemic regions. Details: A meta-analysis of results from five clinical studies shows that maternal intake of iron as ferrous sulfate 20-60 mg daily for 14-26 weeks starting in the second trimester of pregnancy does not affect the length of gestation or increase birthweight of the infant (95434). In females from a malaria-endemic area who have never been pregnant before, another clinical study shows that taking ferrous gluconate 60 mg and folic acid 2.8 mg weekly, starting before conception and continuing to the first antenatal visit, may more than double the risk of preterm birth, defined as a delivery under 37 weeks gestation, when compared with folic acid alone (100969). Some research suggests that the adverse outcome in this latter study may be explained by a rise in hepcidin levels in pregnant patients with malaria. Hepcidin is a hormone that regulates iron absorption and distribution, and malaria can upregulate hepcidin. High levels of hepcidin can decrease iron absorption, stimulate inflammatory processes, and cause progesterone withdrawal, leading to preterm labor (102863).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• ACE inhibitor-induced cough. It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial in patients with this condition. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking ferrous sulfate 256 mg daily reduces or eliminates cough induced by ACE inhibitors such as captopril (Capoten), enalapril (Vasotec), lisinopril (Prinivil, Zestril), and others, when compared with placebo (7307).
• Androgenic alopecia. Oral iron has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients, its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with androgenic alopecia or telogen effluvium shows that taking one tablet daily of a specific product (GFM Oral, Cantabria Labs), providing an unknown dose of iron in combination with selenium, taurine, cysteine, methionine, and hydrolyzed collagen, along with conventional therapy, consisting primarily of finasteride or minoxidil, for 12 weeks improves hair loss when compared with conventional therapy alone (111636). It is unclear if this effect is due to iron, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial in children with ADHD. Details: Three small clinical studies in children with ADHD and iron deficiency shows that taking oral iron improves some measures of ADHD after 1-3 months of treatment when compared with baseline or placebo. These studies used ferrous sulfate 5 mg/kg daily, ferrous sulfate 80 mg daily, ferrous fumarate 200 mg daily for children weighing up to 30 kg, or ferrous fumarate 400 mg daily for children weighing more than 30 kg (1093,16013,110191).
• Child development. It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial for improving development in non-anemic children. Details: Some observational research has found that iron deficiency in infancy is associated with poor verbal performance and social skills in childhood (102862). It is unknown whether iron supplementation can ameliorate these developmental issues. In non-anemic infants and children, preliminary clinical research shows that iron does not improve cognitive performance; the evidence for the benefits of iron on psychomotor development is conflicting (20129,20130,91315,96616,96626).
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial for esophageal cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that taking iron supplements is associated with a 32% lower risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma when compared to never taking iron supplements. However, use of iron supplements is not associated with a lower risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (95435).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial in patients with fatigue due to iron deficiency without anemia. Details: A meta-analysis of mainly preliminary clinical research in adults with iron deficiency without anemia shows that iron reduces self-reported fatigue moderately more than placebo (104684). A specific ferrous sulfate supplement (Tardyferon; Pierre Fabre Médicament) providing 80 mg of elemental iron daily for 4-12 weeks was used in two studies included in this analysis (11406,91188).
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In patients with active IBD, intravenous iron may be more beneficial than oral iron due to impaired absorption. However, it may also increase the risk of infection in these patients. Details: Since the absorption of oral iron may be impaired in patients with active symptoms of IBD, guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology suggest that treatment with parenteral iron may be needed in patients with IBD who have moderate to severe iron-deficiency anemia (110193). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research in this population shows that administering IV iron, usually as iron sucrose or ferric carboxymaltose, increases the risk of infection by 73% when compared with oral iron or no iron (110186).
• Postoperative recovery. It is unclear if intravenous iron is beneficial for recovery following cardiac surgery. Details: A meta-analysis of low- to moderate-quality clinical research in patients with preoperative iron-deficiency anemia shows that treatment with intravenous iron before cardiac surgery does not improve the rate of transfusions or the length of stay in the intensive care unit or hospital when compared with control groups, including placebo, oral iron, or no treatment. Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous iron does not reduce postoperative mortality rates (110182).
• Postpartum depression. Although there has been interest in using iron for postpartum depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of iron for this condition.
• Prematurity. Enteral iron seems to be beneficial for some measures of development in preterm infants. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in preterm or low birthweight infants fed human milk shows that enteral iron supplementation increases linear growth and reduces the risk of anemia when compared with control groups receiving no iron supplementation. However, there was no effect on serum ferritin, weight, head circumference, cognitive development, risk of infection, or risk of necrotising enterocolitis (110177). Additional clinical research in infants born at 24-28 weeks' gestation shows that a higher average enteral iron dose by 60 days of age is positively associated with cognitive performance at 2 years of corrected age. However, this association was not present for iron doses received at 90 days of age (110190). More evidence is needed to rate iron for these uses.

(Read more about IRON)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Diabetes. Although there has been interest in using oral pea protein for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pea protein for this purpose.
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral pea protein is beneficial for exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A small clinical study in healthy, untrained males shows that taking a specific type of pea protein (Nutralys S85 Plus, Roquette) 0.3 grams/kg 3 times daily for 5 days after a 90-minute whole-body high-intensity eccentric exercise bout does not reduce surrogate markers of exercise-induced muscle damage, including creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, and myoglobin, when compared with whey protein or water (104758). However, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups and is further limited by double-blinding restricted only to the protein supplements. The water control did not match the taste, texture, or calorie content of the protein supplements. Another small clinical trial in healthy, physically active older adults shows that taking pea protein 25 grams daily for 10 days prior to and 3 days after a single 20-30 km endurance walk does not improve markers of muscle damage when compared with placebo and may be less effective when compared with whey protein (111729).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral pea protein is beneficial for exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: A small clinical study in healthy, untrained males shows that taking a specific type of pea protein (Nutralys S85 Plus, Roquette) 0.3 grams/kg 3 times daily for 5 days after a 90-minute whole-body high-intensity eccentric exercise bout does not reduce exercise-induced muscle soreness when compared with whey protein or water (104758). However, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups and is further limited by double-blinding restricted only to the protein supplements. The water control did not match the taste, texture, or calorie content of the protein supplements. Another small clinical trial in healthy, physically active older adults shows that taking pea protein 25 grams daily for 10 days prior to and 3 days after a single 20-30 km endurance walk does not improve muscle soreness when compared with whey protein or placebo (111729).
• Hyperlipidemia. Although there has been interest in using oral pea protein for hyperlipidemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pea protein for this purpose.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral pea protein hydrolysate is beneficial for hypertension. Details: A small clinical study in adults with elevated blood pressure shows that taking a pea protein hydrolysate 3 grams daily for 3 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure by 6 mmHg when compared with placebo. Taking the same product at a dose of 1.5 grams daily does not reduce blood pressure (94973).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Oral pea protein has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small open-label study in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS shows that taking two tablets of a specific product (Gelsectan, Noventure) containing pea protein, grape seed extract tannins, xyloglucan, and xylo-oligosaccharides (doses unknown) before breakfast and dinner daily for 6 months improves IBS-related symptoms, including diarrhea, pain, bloating, defecatory frequency, stool consistency, and defecatory urgency when compared to baseline (108881). The validity of this study is limited by a lack of placebo control group.
• Muscle strength. Clinical research on the impact of oral pea protein on muscle strength is mixed. Its effects might be similar to whey protein. Pea protein may be more effective in individuals with lower baseline muscle strength. Details: A clinical trial in physically active, but non-resistance trained, young male adults participating in a 12-week upper body resistance training program shows that taking a specific type of pea protein isolate (Nutralys, Roquette) 25 grams twice daily over the training program does not augment training-induced increases in muscle thickness or strength when compared with whey protein or isocaloric placebo. However, a post hoc analysis of participants with the lowest muscle strength at baseline shows that pea protein supplementation increases bicep muscle thickness more than placebo and to a similar degree as whey protein (95426). Additionally, a very small clinical study in trained adults shows that taking pea protein 24 grams twice daily during an 8-week high-intensity functional training program improves muscle strength to a similar degree as whey protein, while neither supplement appears to impact muscle thickness or body mass (102013). The small study size and lack of an isocaloric, protein-free control limits conclusions that can be drawn from this study.
• Obesity. Although there has been interest in using oral pea protein for obesity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pea protein for this purpose.
• Postoperative recovery. Oral pea protein has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults undergoing gastrointestinal resection due to cancer shows that consuming a beverage (Providextra, Fresenius Kabi) containing pea protein hydrolysate 11% and carbohydrates 89% the night before (400 mL) and the morning of surgery (200 mL) reduces postoperative hospital stay by almost 2-fold when compared with conventional preoperative fasting (94933). It is unclear if these findings are due to pea protein, carbohydrates, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate pea protein for these uses.

(Read more about PEA PROTEIN)

EFFECTIVE

• Hypokalemia. Oral or intravenous potassium can treat and prevent hypokalemia. Details: Administering potassium orally or intravenously is effective for treating and preventing hypokalemia (15,107970). Oral potassium 20 mEq (780 mg of elemental potassium) is typically taken once daily to prevent hypokalemia (15,95010). Oral potassium 40-100 mEq (1560-3900 mg of elemental potassium) is typically taken in 2-5 divided doses daily to treat hypokalemia (95010). Doses should be limited to 40 mEq (1560 mg of elemental potassium), and the total dose should not exceed 200 mEq (7800 mg of elemental potassium) in 24 hours (95010). Potassium supplementation and route of administration should be individualized based on serum potassium level and patient status (15,107970).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Hypertension. Oral potassium, via dietary intake or supplementation, reduces blood pressure. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary potassium consumption is associated with a lower risk of developing hypertension (1310,8817,69512). Additionally, most clinical research shows that potassium, taken orally as part of the diet or as a supplement, reduces systolic blood pressure by about 3-9.5 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by about 2-6.4 mmHg in patients with or without hypertension (3385,92104,92106,95624,107974). In most of these studies, daily intake of potassium typically ranged from about 1500-7800 mg, with the most common intake being about 2340-2540 mg daily (92104,95624). However, some research shows that taking potassium does not lower systolic or diastolic blood pressure (69541,69550,107966). Differences in the patient populations, potassium intake, and salt intake could have contributed to the conflicting results. Potassium seems to be more effective for people with hypertension, low potassium levels, high daily sodium intake, and for Black adults (3384,3385,3386,92104,92106). Some research also shows that the greatest blood pressure-lowering effects of potassium occur at doses of about 3900-7800 mg daily (95624). A meta-analysis of clinical trials using a novel computational technique to assess both potassium intake and excretion suggests that the optimal blood pressure reduction occurs when taking about 1500 mg supplemental potassium daily or an overall intake of 4500-6500 mg potassium daily (105448). This analysis is limited by the heterogeneity and short duration of the included trials. There is also interest in utilizing low-sodium, high-potassium food substitutes to treat hypertension. Research shows that using salt substitutes containing 25% to 30% potassium chloride reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 3-4.6 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, when compared with regular table salt (107971,107976). In 2017, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) published guidelines recommending that patients with hypertension consume 3500-5000 mg of potassium daily (95680). This intake of potassium is expected to lower systolic blood pressure by about 4-5 mmHg in patients with hypertension and by about 2 mmHg in normotensive patients (3385). Although potassium supplements and dietary potassium both seem to be beneficial, the guidelines recommend getting potassium from dietary sources, since potassium-rich diets are usually heart-healthy (95680). Additionally, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Oral prescription potassium citrate reduces the risk of kidney stone recurrence. It is unclear if non-prescription potassium citrate would be beneficial. Details: The American Urological Association (AUA) recommends potassium citrate therapy for patients with recurrent calcium stones and low urinary citrate, those with recurrent calcium or calcium oxalate stones without current metabolic abnormalities, and those with uric acid or cystine stones. The citrate component reduces urine calcium excretion and increases urine citrate and urine pH, which in turn alleviates crystal growth, formation, and aggregation. Sodium citrate may also be used to prevent stone recurrence; however, due to sodium's propensity to increase urine calcium excretion, potassium citrate remains the preferred salt formulation (107972). It is important to note that potassium citrate supplements are not equivalent to prescription potassium citrate products. Dose and duration of treatment is determined by a healthcare professional and individualized based on a patient's urinary citrate levels (107975,107989). Serum potassium levels should be monitored prior to starting potassium citrate, within 2 weeks of treatment initiation, and every 12 months (107975).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Eating foods high in potassium and low in sodium might reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. It is unclear if taking potassium supplements has the same benefit. Details: Large population studies in adults without prior CVD have found that higher dietary potassium intake is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events (109395,109399). One study found that daily potassium intake of about 3300 mg is associated with a 13% reduction in CVD risk when compared with intake of about 1920 mg (109399). The other study found that each additional 1000 mg of daily urinary potassium excretion, which is a marker of dietary intake, is associated with an 18% reduction in CVD risk (109395). Another observational study in over 15,000 adults with history of stroke or hypertension shows that replacing regular table salt with a substitute product containing 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride for an average of 5 years decreases the rate of stroke, major cardiovascular events, or death (107976). High quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this association. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).
• Stroke. Eating foods high in potassium and low in sodium might reduce the risk of stroke. It is unclear if taking potassium supplements has the same benefit. Details: Higher dietary intake of potassium seems to be associated with a lower risk of stroke. Population research has found that increasing dietary potassium intake by 1-1.5 grams daily is associated with up to a 20% reduced risk of stroke (92105,92107). Some population research has found that higher supplemental intake of potassium is associated with a 29% reduced risk of ischemic stroke. However, supplemental potassium intake is not found to be associated with a lower risk of hemorrhagic or total stroke (92107). An observational study in over 15,000 adults with history of stroke or hypertension shows that replacing regular table salt with a substitute product containing 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride for an average of 5 years decreases the rate of stroke, major cardiovascular events, or death (107976). High quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this association. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Dental hypersensitivity. It is unclear if topical potassium improves dental hypersensitivity. Details: One meta-analysis of clinical research shows that using a dentifrice containing 5% potassium nitrite reduces dentin sensitivity when compared with a dentifrice that does not contain potassium nitrite (69549). Other clinical research published in a systematic review shows that potassium-containing toothpastes might reduce dentin sensitivity more than controls that do not contain potassium. However, these toothpastes might be less effective than other active toothpastes, such as those containing sodium monofluorophosphate, and the effect may result from a placebo effect, since the mechanism of action of potassium is unclear (69456).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if increasing dietary potassium reduces the risk of diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of 7 large population studies has found that consuming dietary potassium 3300-3500 mg daily is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of diabetes when compared with consumption below 1000 mg daily. Results were similar when studies that measured potassium intake with a dietary questionnaire were analyzed separately from those that measured intake based on urinary potassium excretion (110776). However, the validity of this finding is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies. Furthermore, despite use of data from various databases, most studies included in the analysis were conducted by the same author.
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral potassium improves glycemic control in prediabetes. Details: A small clinical study in Black patients with prediabetes shows that taking extended-release potassium (Klor-Con M10, Cardinal Health) 40 mEq daily as potassium chloride for 3 months does not improve glucose tolerance when compared with placebo. Although fasting glucose levels were slightly reduced in the potassium group when compared with placebo, both groups experienced a worsening of glucose intolerance, with no change in insulin levels or glycated hemoglobin (98533).
• Osteoporosis. Although there is interest in using oral potassium for osteoporosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of potassium for this condition.
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral potassium improves physical performance in older adults. Details: Observational research in older adults has found that decreased dietary potassium intake and increased dietary sodium intake over 5 years is associated with worsened physical performance (105450).
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral potassium is beneficial in patients with SLE. Details: Observational research in patients with SLE has found that increased dietary potassium intake is not associated with improvements in disease activity scores or markers of cardiovascular disease, including lipid levels and blood pressure, when compared with low dietary potassium intake. However, higher potassium intake does seem to reduce the odds of having elevated levels of C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation, in these patients (109397). More evidence is needed to rate potassium for these uses.

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Taking oral pumpkin seed or pumpkin seed oil may improve symptoms of BPH. Details: One study in patients with BPH shows that taking pumpkin seed 5 grams twice daily for 12 months may be more effective for controlling symptoms than pumpkin seed extract 1000 mg twice daily (92383). A specific pumpkin seed extract (Prosta Pink Forte) 1-2 capsules daily for 12 weeks has also been used (11231). Some preliminary clinical research also suggests that taking pumpkin seed oil (Prostafit, EuRho Vital) two tablets daily for 6 months may be as effective as the medication prazosin (92382). Pumpkin seed oil has also been compared with tamsulosin. A clinical study comparing pumpkin seed oil 360 mg twice daily to tamsulosin 0.4 mg once nightly for 3 months shows that both treatment groups report improvements in BPH symptoms and quality of life when compared with baseline, although improvement appears greater in the tamsulosin group, specifically when measured at 1 month and 3 months. In the pumpkin seed oil group, adverse effects were reported in 0% of patients, compared with 15% of patients taking tamsulosin (107842). The validity of this study is limited due to the short duration of treatment. Pumpkin seed oil or extracts have also been studied in combination with saw palmetto (6777), with saw palmetto, nettle root, and lemon extracts plus beta carotene (5093), and with saw palmetto, small flowered willow herb, lycopene, and pygeum (92379).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Androgenic alopecia. Oral pumpkin seed oil might improve hair regrowth in males with mild to moderate hair loss. Details: Clinical research in males with mild to moderate hair loss shows that taking pumpkin seed oil (Octa Sabal Plus, Dreamplus Co. Ltd.) 400 mg daily in divided doses for 24 weeks increases hair count by 30% when compared with placebo. Self-rated improvement and satisfaction scores were 62% and 52% with pumpkin seed oil and placebo, respectively (92378). Clinical research in patients with female pattern hair loss shows that applying 1 mL of pumpkin seed oil to the scalp daily for 30 days improves hair regrowth similarly to minoxidil 5% foam, 1 mL daily (104974).
• Interstitial cystitis. Although there is interest in using oral pumpkin for interstitial cystitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pumpkin for this condition.
• Intestinal parasite infection. Although there is interest in using oral pumpkin for intestinal parasite infection, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pumpkin for this condition.
• Overactive bladder. Oral pumpkin seed oil has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in females with overactive bladder shows that taking a specific combination product (Granu Fink femina, Omega Pharma) containing pumpkin seed oil 227 mg, sweet sumac bark extract 56 mg, and hops cone extract 18 mg three times daily for 12 weeks decreases the frequency of urination and leakage and improves quality of life when compared to baseline (103253). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group. Additionally, it is unclear if these findings are due to pumpkin seed oil, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Although there is interest in using oral pumpkin for UTIs, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pumpkin for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate pumpkin for these uses.

(Read more about PUMPKIN)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Hypertension. Oral sesame oil seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research involving patients with or without hypertension show that taking sesame, or the sesame constituent sesamin, can reduce both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (96179,108355,108357). One meta-analysis of eight clinical studies shows that sesame or sesamin can reduce SBP by 8 mmHg and DBP by 6 mmHg when compared with control. In a subgroup analysis of patients with hypertension, reductions in SBP and DBP were 11 mmHg and 9 mmHg, respectively. In a subgroup analysis by formulation, sesame oil was shown to reduce SBP and DBP by 13 mmHg and 10 mmHg, respectively, while whole sesame seed, ground seed, or sesame supplement lowered SBP by only 3 mmHg and did not lower DBP (96179). Another meta-analysis of clinical studies involving patients with hypertension, metabolic syndrome, or kidney failure shows that taking sesame oil reduces SBP and DBP by 3 mmHg and 2 mmHg, respectively, although benefits were limited to studies of less than 8 weeks (108355). Some research on sesame oil involved replacing other cooking oils with a specific brand of sesame oil (Idhayam Gingelly oil, V.V.V. & Sons) 35 grams daily for about 6-9 weeks. Patients included in these studies were also using atenolol, nifedipine, and/or hydrochlorothiazide as antihypertensives (27652,27654,27655). Other preliminary clinical research shows that using a 20:80 blend of sesame oil and rice bran oil (Vivo, Adani Wilmar) as cooking oil for 8 weeks improves blood pressure and lipid profile in patients with hypertension. In patients using nifedipine, using the oil blend seems to reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure by an additional 2 to 2.2-fold over nifedipine alone (96180).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Cough. Oral sesame oil does not seem to be beneficial for cough in children. Details: Clinical research in children with an acute cough due to common cold shows that taking sesame oil 5 mL by mouth at bedtime for 3 consecutive days does not reduce cough strength or cough frequency when compared with placebo (27647).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Aging skin. Although there is interest in using topical sesame oil for aging skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sesame for this purpose.
• Alzheimer disease. Although there is interest in using oral sesame for Alzheimer disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sesame for this condition.
• Anemia of chronic disease. Although there is interest in using oral sesame for anemia of chronic disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sesame for this condition.
• Anxiety. Although there is interest in using topical sesame oil for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sesame for this purpose.
• Bowel obstruction. It is unclear if oral sesame oil is beneficial for bowel obstruction. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with adhesive small bowel obstruction shows that giving sesame oil 150 mL through a nasogastric tube along with standard treatment reduces the need for surgical intervention when compared with standard treatment alone. Also, the resolution time of the obstruction was 6 hours faster and the duration of hospitalization was 4 days shorter for patients treated with sesame oil plus standard treatment when compared with standard treatment alone (27645). Standard treatment consisted of stopping oral intake of food, performing nasogastric tube decompression, administering intravenous fluids with electrolytes, and providing parenteral antibiotics if leukocytosis was present.
• Burns. It is unclear if topical sesame oil is beneficial for burns. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults and children with partial thickness thermal burns covering less than 40% of body surface area shows that topical application with a moist exposed burn ointment (MEBO) containing sesame oil, beta-sitosterol, berberine, and other unspecified plant ingredients every 4 hours reduces the median time to 75% healing by 3 days (17 days vs. 20 days) and improves analgesic effects during the first 5 days of treatment when compared with a control group receiving cleansing with chlorhexidine 0.05%. The MEBO was left on the burn for 5 days, followed by removal and reapplication at 4 hourly intervals on day 5, to be left on until day 14 (13526).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although there is interest in using oral sesame for CVD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sesame for this condition.
• Cataracts. Although there is interest in using oral sesame for cataracts, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sesame for this condition.
• Chemotherapy-induced phlebitis. It is unclear if massage with topical sesame oil is beneficial for chemotherapy-induced phlebitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with colorectal cancer and chemotherapy-induced phlebitis shows that applying 10 drops of sesame oil within a 10 cm radius of the affected veins as part of a 5-minute, twice-daily massage reduces pain after 7 days when compared with massage alone (103227).
• Child growth. It is unclear if massage with topical sesame oil is beneficial for child growth. Details: Preliminary clinical research in full-term healthy infants shows that administering a daily massage with sesame oil 20 mL for 4 weeks improves infant length by 1 cm, midarm circumference by 0.9 cm, and midleg circumference by 0.7 cm when compared with a control group that did not receive a massage (29722). It is unclear if these effects are due to sesame oil, massage, or the combination.
• Cognitive impairment. It is unclear if oral sesame is beneficial for cognitive impairment. Details: Clinical research in older adults with memory impairment shows that taking sesame oil cake extract (Keukdong H-Pharm Co., Ltd.) 500 mg three times daily for 12 weeks modestly improves some, but not all, measures of cognitive function when compared with placebo (108351). In addition, preliminary clinical research in patients with mild cognitive impairment shows that taking two capsules of a combination product containing the sesame constituent sesamin 5 mg and astaxanthin 3 mg daily for 12 weeks increases psychomotor and processing speed when compared with placebo. However, there was no effect on memory, attention, or overall severity of cognitive symptoms (99863). It is not clear if these effects are due to sesamin, astaxanthin, or the combination.
• Dental plaque. It is unclear if rinsing the mouth with sesame oil or pulling the oil through the teeth is beneficial for dental plaque. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children 12-14 years of age shows that rinsing with 10 mL of ozonated or non-ozonated sesame oil for 10 minutes daily for 15 days reduces plaque when compared with baseline. The ozonated sesame oil was superior to non-ozonated sesame oil, showing a similar improvement in plaque when compared with chlorhexidine mouthwash (103226). A small clinical study in healthy adults shows that pulling sesame oil 10 mL through the teeth for 15-20 minutes twice daily for 4 days has similar effects on full-mouth prevention of plaque regrowth, tooth staining, gingival index, and bleeding when compared with pulling coconut oil through the teeth (106038).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral sesame oil is beneficial for diabetes. Details: Meta-analyses suggest that taking sesame for 6-12 weeks modestly reduces levels of fasting blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), but not insulin levels or insulin resistance, when compared with placebo, baseline, or other control. Sesame oil and seed flour, tahini, and sesamin were used in the included research (108350,108352,108355). Although most studies included in these meta-analyses were conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes, one study (103231) was conducted in patients with metabolic syndrome. One small clinical trial included in these meta-analyses shows that replacing other cooking oils with a specific brand of sesame oil (Idhayam Gingelly oil, V.V.V. & Sons) 35 grams daily for 45 days reduces blood glucose levels and HbA1c when compared with baseline in patients with diabetes who are also using glibenclamide (27654). Sesame oil has also been investigated in combination with rice bran oil. One preliminary clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes not using antidiabetes medications shows that using a specific 20:80 blend of sesame oil and rice bran oil (Vivo, Adani Wilmar) as the only cooking oil for 8 weeks reduces levels of fasting blood glucose by 14% and reduces HbA1c when compared with baseline. In patients taking glibenclamide 5 mg daily, using this oil blend reduces fasting blood glucose and HbA1c when compared with glibenclamide alone (96177). The use of sesame oil has also been investigated for improving cardiometabolic markers in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clinical research in adults taking antidiabetes medications shows that replacing regular dietary oils with sesame oil or a blend of sesame and canola oils for 9 weeks does not improve most cardiometabolic markers when compared with canola oil or sunflower oil as a control (108353).
• Gastric cancer. Although there is interest in using oral sesame for gastric cancer prevention, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sesame for this purpose.
• Gingivitis. It is unclear if pulling sesame oil through the teeth is beneficial for gingivitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adolescent males with plaque-induced gingivitis shows that oil pulling with sesame oil for one minute daily each morning prior to brushing for 10 days reduces dental plaque and gingivitis when compared with baseline (27648). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Hemorrhoids. Topical sesame oil has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small study in adults with symptomatic mild to moderate (first- and second-degree) internal hemorrhoids shows that application of a cream containing sesame oil and aqueous extracts of guggul and Allium ampeloprasum as a thin layer to the anus twice daily for 3 weeks improves anal irritation and itching, bleeding, pain, defecation discomfort, and swelling sense when compared with baseline. In contrast, patients using a placebo cream experienced an improvement only in anal itching (105751). The poor study methodology and lack of statistical comparison to the placebo group limit the validity of these findings.
• HIV/AIDS-related wasting. Oral sesame has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with HIV shows that consuming 300 grams of a chickpea and sesame-based food supplement daily for 3 months, along with routine sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, improves weight gain, body mass index, and mid-upper arm circumference in 73% of patients, and results in improved physical performance in 78% of patients, when compared to baseline (27657). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear if oral sesame is beneficial for hyperlipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of a limited number of clinical studies that included mainly patients without hyperlipidemia shows that consuming sesame 25-50 grams daily or using sesame oil 3.5-35 grams daily for up to 10 weeks does not reduce levels of total or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when compared with baseline (96181). However, a more recent meta-analysis with similar studies shows that consuming sesame reduces levels of total cholesterol by 16 mg/dL, although there is no effect on levels of LDL cholesterol or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (108357). Both analyses show that taking sesame reduces triglyceride levels by about 21 mg/dL (96181,108357). Significant heterogeneity of the included studies and patient populations limits the validity of these results.
• Insect repellent. Although there is interest in using topical sesame oil as an insect repellent, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sesame for this purpose.
• Male infertility. It is unclear if oral sesame is beneficial for male infertility. Details: Preliminary clinical research in males with infertility shows that taking sesame 0.5 mg/kg daily for 3 months modestly improves sperm count and motility, but not sperm morphology, when compared with baseline (108356). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Menopausal symptoms. Although there is interest in using oral sesame for menopausal symptoms, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sesame for this purpose.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral sesame oil is beneficial for improving metabolic parameters in adults with metabolic syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that taking sesame oil 30 mL with or without vitamin E 400 mg daily for 8 weeks improves levels of fasting blood glucose, lipids, and blood pressure when compared with sunflower oil. In those taking sesame oil alone, total cholesterol and triglycerides were reduced by about 13 mg/dL, while low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were not affected. In those also taking sesame oil with vitamin E, total cholesterol and triglycerides were reduced by 17 mg/dL and 21 mg/dL, respectively, while HDL cholesterol was increased by 4 mg/dL. Additionally, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were reduced by 10 mmHg and 8 mmHg, respectively, in those taking sesame oil alone, versus 15 mmHg and 9 mmHg, respectively, in those taking sesame oil with vitamin E (103231).
• Miscarriage. It is unclear if oral sesame is beneficial for the management of an incomplete miscarriage. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with incomplete abortion related to miscarriage shows that taking sesame seed twice daily for 5 days results in complete resolution of retained products of conception in 84% of individuals, based on a sonographic assessment, compared with 26% of those receiving expectant management as control. There was also a 2-day reduction in the duration of vaginal bleeding when compared with control. Each dose of ground sesame seed powder 30 grams was boiled in 200 mL water for 4 minutes and then filtered before drinking (108346).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral sesame oil is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: Clinical research in females with NAFLD shows that taking sesame oil 30 grams daily for 12 weeks reduces the severity of fatty liver in 89% of patients taking sesame oil, compared with 58% of those taking sunflower oil. There were also modest reductions in levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), but not alkaline phosphatase (ALP), when compared with sunflower oil. All patients were also consuming a 500-kcal hypocaloric diet (108354).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral sesame is beneficial for weight loss. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking sesame or sesame oil in doses of at least 35 grams daily reduces body weight by up to 2 kg and body mass index by up to 1 kg/m² when compared with no oil or a control oil. Clinical studies included in these meta-analysis enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and others, and were not limited to overweight or obese individuals (108355,108357). A small clinical study in overweight individuals shows that replacing regular dietary oil with sesame oil for 9 weeks does not improve levels of most cardiometabolic risk factors, although there were modest beneficial effects on insulin (108349).
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if topical sesame oil is beneficial for knee osteoarthritis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee shows that applying sesame oil 1.5 mL to the affected knee three times daily for 4 weeks reduces pain and improves physical function when compared to baseline. These improvements were similar to those seen in patients applying diclofenac topical gel (103228).
• Osteoporosis. Although there is interest in using oral sesame for osteoporosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sesame for this condition.
• Pain (acute). It is unclear if massage with topical sesame oil is beneficial for acute pain caused by blunt trauma. Details: One small clinical study shows that using a specific sesame oil (Saman sesame oil, Saman sesame oil Co.) topically as part of a light massage for 5 minutes twice daily for 9 days moderately reduces acute pain caused by blunt trauma to an extremity by day 6 when compared with a light massage with placebo oil. However, the sesame oil massage does not reduce the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs when compared with placebo oil (96178). A similar clinical study in the same population shows that using sesame oil extracted from tahini topically as part of a light massage for 5 minutes 3 times a day for 2 days improves pain severity, pain sensitivity, and heaviness of the painful site by about 20% when compared with baseline (106034). The lack of statistical comparison to the placebo group limits the validity of these findings.
• Peptic ulcers. Although there is interest in using oral sesame for peptic ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sesame for this purpose.
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if oral sesame is beneficial for RA. Details: Preliminary clinical research in females with RA shows that taking the sesame constituent sesamin (Sesamin, Scivation, Inc.) 200 mg daily for 6 weeks improves physical function and reduces pain, the number of tender and swollen joints, and markers of inflammation such as C-reactive protein when compared with placebo (103230).
• Stroke. Although there is interest in using oral sesame for stroke, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sesame for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate sesame for these uses.

(Read more about SESAME)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Cystic fibrosis. Long-term nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride improves lung function and reduces pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis show that, when taken along with a bronchodilator and other standard therapies, nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride in concentrations of 3% to 7%, up to 10 mL twice daily for 4 weeks, increases forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) when compared with isotonic saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) (26230,26230). This benefit was not seen at 48 weeks. Other clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis shows that inhaling sodium chloride 7%, 4 mL twice daily for 48 weeks, does not improve FEV1 when compared with isotonic saline. However, chronic treatment with hypertonic saline does reduce the number of pulmonary exacerbations and increase the number of patients without pulmonary exacerbations when compared with isotonic saline (29402). It is not clear if this benefit occurs in children with cystic fibrosis. The Pulmonary Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends that individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 6 years or older use nebulized hypertonic saline long-term to improve lung function, reduce the number of exacerbations, and improve quality of life (29403).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity. Oral sodium chloride seems to prevent nephrotoxicity associated with use of amphotericin B. Details: Clinical research shows that administering oral or intravenous sodium chloride 150 mEq daily during treatment with amphotericin B can attenuate the rise in serum creatinine levels and preserve renal function when compared to treatment with amphotericin B alone (26226).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in preventing lithium level fluctuations in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A moderate-sized open-label clinical study in adults with type I bipolar disorder receiving lithium carbonate shows that taking sodium chloride 1 gram daily for 12 weeks along with dietary salt restriction of 1 gram daily reduces the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L, but does not significantly affect serum sodium, potassium, aldosterone, or creatinine levels when compared with controls who were not salt restricted, but were advised not to consume additional salt at the table (112909). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by missing data in both groups.
• Canker sores. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for canker sores, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Congestive heart failure. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in patients with acute decompensated heart failure requiring decongestive therapy with diuretics. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure requiring high-dose intravenous furosemide shows that taking sodium chloride 2 grams three times daily for up to 96 hours does not affect patient weight or serum creatinine levels when compared with placebo (112911). However, the clinical relevance of this study is unclear and it may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Conjunctivitis. Although there is interest in using ophthalmic sodium chloride for conjunctivitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Hyponatremia. Although there is interest in using oral sodium chloride for hyponatremia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral sodium chloride for this condition.
• Pharyngitis. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for pharyngitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial for premature infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in infants born at less than 32 weeks' gestation shows that adding sodium 4 mEq/kg daily to enteral feedings, starting from the 7th day after birth and continuing through the 35th day, reduces the risk of developing hyponatremia and improves weight gain when compared with adding water (98180). A small, open-label clinical study in newborns less than 35 weeks gestation shows that high sodium intake, defined as an average of 0.25% sodium in maintenance fluids, for 48 hours on day 2 and 3 after birth results in less weight loss within the first 72 hours of life when compared with control, but does not improve mortality, length of hospital stay, or complications from prematurity (112908). However, interpretation of these findings is limited by varied concentrations of sodium as an intervention. More evidence is needed to rate sodium for these uses.

(Read more about SODIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (7555,12928,12946,95817). However, excessive doses should be avoided. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: Age 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51+ years, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stone, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). Also, advise patients taking calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D (93533).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. The National Academy of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51 years and older, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients to not consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). Also, advise patients taking calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D (93533).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (17506).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (945,1586,3263,3264,17506). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prescribing oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancy to those with low dietary calcium intake to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the same daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age independent of pregnancy status: 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg (17506). Doses over these amounts might increase the risk of neonatal hypocalcemia-induced seizures possibly caused by transient neonatal hypoparathyroidism in the setting of excessive calcium supplementation during pregnancy, especially during the third trimester. Neonatal hypocalcemia is a risk factor for neonatal seizures (97345).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. For people age 14 and older with adequate iron stores, iron supplements are safe when used in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 45 mg per day of elemental iron. The UL is not meant to apply to those who receive iron under medical supervision (7135,96621). To treat iron deficiency, most people can safely take up to 300 mg elemental iron per day (15). ...when used intravenously and appropriately. Ferric carboxymaltose 200 mg and iron sucrose 200 mg have been given intravenously for up to 10 doses with no reported serious adverse effects (91179). A meta-analysis of clinical studies of hemodialysis patients shows that administering high-dose intravenous (IV) iron does not increase the risk of hospitalization, infection, cardiovascular events, or death when compared with low-dose IV iron, oral iron, or no iron treatment (102861). A more recent meta-analysis of clinical studies of all patient populations shows that administering IV iron does not increase the risk of hospital length of stay or mortality, although the risk of infection is increased by 16% when compared with oral iron or no iron (110186). Despite these findings, there are rare reports of hypophosphatemia and/or osteomalacia (112603,112608,112609,112610).

LIKELY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. Doses of 30 mg/kg are associated with acute toxicity. Long-term use of high doses of iron can cause hemosiderosis and multiple organ damage. The estimated lethal dose of iron is 180-300 mg/kg; however, doses as low as 60 mg/kg have also been lethal (15).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (7135,91183,112601).

CHILDREN: LIKELY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive amounts. Tell patients who are not iron-deficient not to use doses above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 40 mg per day of elemental iron for infants and children. Higher doses frequently cause gastrointestinal side effects such as constipation and nausea (7135,20097). Iron is the most common cause of pediatric poisoning deaths. Doses as low as 60 mg/kg can be fatal (15).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Iron is safe during pregnancy and breast-feeding in patients with adequate iron stores when used in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 45 mg daily of elemental iron (7135,96625,110180).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY UNSAFE
when used orally in high doses. Tell patients who are not iron deficient to avoid exceeding the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 45 mg daily of elemental iron. Higher doses frequently cause gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea and vomiting (7135) and might increase the risk of preterm labor (100969). High hemoglobin concentrations at the time of delivery are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes (7135,20109).

(Read more about IRON)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in food amounts. Pea protein is commonly consumed as a food (94935,94970,94981).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when pea protein is used orally in medicinal amounts, short term. Pea protein has been used with apparent safety in doses of up to 50 grams daily for up to 12 weeks (95426,94934,102013,104758,104759). ...when pea protein hydrolysate is used orally, short term. A pea protein hydrolysate has been used with apparent safety at doses of up to 3 grams daily for up to 3 weeks (94973).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using in amounts greater than those found in food.

(Read more about PEA PROTEIN)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in doses up to 100 mEq total potassium daily, not to exceed 200 mEq in a 24-hour period (95010,107989). Oral potassium chloride and potassium citrate are FDA-approved prescription products (95010,107989). Larger doses increase the risk of hyperkalemia (15). ...when administered intravenously (IV) at appropriate infusion rates (95011). Parenteral potassium is an FDA-approved prescription product (15,95011). A tolerable upper intake level (UL) for potassium has not been established; however, potassium levels should be monitored in individuals at increased risk for hyperkalemia, such as those with kidney disease, heart failure, and adrenal insufficiency (100310,107966).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in dietary amounts. A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for healthy individuals (6243,100310).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in dietary amounts of 40-80 mEq daily (15). A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for healthy individuals (100310).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in amounts commonly found in foods.

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when the seed or seed oil is used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts, short-term. Pumpkin seed has been used with apparent safety in a dose of up to 10 grams daily for up to 12 months (92383). Pumpkin seed oil has been used with apparent safety in a dose of up to 400 mg daily for up to 6 months (92378). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of pumpkin seed oil when used topically.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using amounts greater than those found in food.

(Read more about PUMPKIN)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in food. Sesame has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when sesame oil is used orally and appropriately, short-term. Sesame oil has been used with apparent safety in doses up to 35 grams daily for up to 12 weeks (96179,96180,108354). The sesame constituent sesamin has been used with apparent safety at doses of 200 mg daily for 6 weeks (103230) and 10 mg daily for 12 weeks (99863). Sesame oil 150 mL has also been administered via nasogastric tube with apparent safety as a single dose (27645). ...when sesame oil is used in a nasal spray, short-term. A specific nasal spray (Nozoil) containing sesame oil has been used with apparent safety for up to 20 days (27658,27659,27660). ...when sesame oil is applied topically (96178,103227,103228). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of other forms of sesame when used in medicinal amounts.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when sesame oil is used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts, short-term. Sesame oil 5 mL has been used safely at bedtime for up to 3 days (27647).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sesame when used in medicinal amounts during pregnancy and lactation.

(Read more about SESAME)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher doses can be safely used therapeutically with appropriate medical monitoring (26226,26227).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid exceeding the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension and increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (26229,98176,98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,100310,109395,109396,109398,109399). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sodium when used topically.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (26229,100310). Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid prolonged use of doses exceeding the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension (26229).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in higher doses. Higher intake can cause hypertension (100310). Also, both the highest and the lowest pre-pregnancy sodium quintile intakes are associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia, and the delivery of small for gestational age (SGA) infants when compared to the middle intake quintile (106264).

(Read more about SODIUM)

ALUMINUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium citrate might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity. Other types of calcium do not increase aluminum absorption.  Details Calcium citrate can increase the absorption of aluminum when taken with aluminum hydroxide. The increase in aluminum levels may become toxic, particularly in individuals with kidney disease (21631). However, the effect of calcium citrate on aluminum absorption is due to the citrate anion rather than calcium cation. Calcium acetate does not appear to increase aluminum absorption (93006).

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.  Details Advise patients to take bisphosphonates at least 30 minutes before calcium, but preferably at a different time of day. Calcium supplements decrease absorption of bisphosphonates (12937).

CALCIPOTRIENE (Dovonex) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Taking calcipotriene with calcium might increase the risk for hypercalcemia.  Details Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (12938). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with calcium supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Intravenous calcium may decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers; oral calcium is unlikely to have this effect.  Details Intravenous calcium is used to decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers in the management of overdose. Intravenous calcium gluconate has been used before intravenous verapamil (Isoptin) to prevent or reduce the hypotensive effects without affecting the antiarrhythmic effects (6124). But there is no evidence that dietary or supplemental calcium when taken orally interacts with calcium channel blockers (12939,12947).

CEFTRIAXONE (Rocephin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Co-administration of intravenous calcium and ceftriaxone can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys.  Details Avoid administering intravenous calcium in any form, such as parenteral nutrition or Lactated Ringers, within 48 hours of intravenous ceftriaxone. Case reports in neonates show that administering intravenous ceftriaxone and calcium can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys. In several cases, neonates have died as a result of this interaction (15794,21632). So far there are no reports in adults; however, there is still concern that this interaction might occur in adults.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Using intravenous calcium with digoxin might increase the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias.  Details Hypercalcemia increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with digoxin (12940). However, one retrospective analysis of clinical data suggests that intravenous calcium does not increase the risk of dysrhythmias or mortality in patients receiving digoxin (38960).

DILTIAZEM (Cardizem, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, calcium might increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of diltiazem.

DOLUTEGRAVIR (Tivicay) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of dolutegravir.  Details Advise patients to take dolutegravir either 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium carbonate 1200 mg concomitantly with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces plasma levels of dolutegravir by almost 40%. Calcium appears to decrease levels of dolutegravir through chelation (93578).

ELVITEGRAVIR (Vitekta) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of elvitegravir.  Details Advise patients to take elvitegravir either 2 hours before or 2 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium along with elvitegravir can reduce blood levels of elvitegravir through chelation (94166).

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption and effectiveness of levothyroxine.  Details Advise patients to take levothyroxine and calcium supplements at least 4 hours apart. Calcium reduces levothyroxine absorption, probably by forming insoluble complexes (5082). Calcium carbonate supplements reduce effectiveness of levothyroxine in patients with hypothyroidism (5081,5082,6137).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use of calcium and lithium may increase this risk of hypercalcemia.  Details Clinical research suggests that long-term use of lithium may cause hypercalcemia in 10% to 60% of patients (38953). Theoretically, concomitant use of lithium and calcium supplements may further increase this risk.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of quinolone antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral quinolones at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements or calcium-fortified foods. Taking calcium at the same time as oral quinolones can reduce quinolone absorption. Calcium binds to quinolones in the gut (4412,10339,21638,38570).

RALTEGRAVIR (Isentress) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium may reduce levels of raltegravir.  Details Pharmacokinetic research shows that taking a single dose of calcium carbonate 3000 mg along with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily modestly decreases the mean area under the curve of raltegravir, but the decrease does not necessitate a dose adjustment of raltegravir (94164). However, a case of elevated HIV-1 RNA levels and documented resistance to raltegravir has been reported for a patient taking calcium carbonate 1 gram three times daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU three times daily in combination with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 11 months. It is thought that calcium reduced raltegravir levels by chelation, leading to treatment failure (94165).

SOTALOL (Betapace) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of sotalol.  Details Advise patients to separate doses by at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium. Calcium appears to reduce the absorption of sotalol, probably by forming insoluble complexes (10018).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral tetracyclines at least 2 hours before, or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements. Taking calcium at the same time as oral tetracyclines can reduce tetracycline absorption. Calcium binds to tetracyclines in the gut (1843).

THIAZIDE DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Taking calcium along with thiazides might increase the risk of hypercalcemia and renal failure.  Details Thiazides reduce calcium excretion by the kidneys (1902). Using thiazides along with moderately large amounts of calcium carbonate increases the risk of milk-alkali syndrome (hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis, renal failure). Patients may need to have their serum calcium levels and/or parathyroid function monitored regularly.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, use of calcium supplements may increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of verapamil.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Iron reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.  Details Advise patients that doses of bisphosphonates should be separated by at least two hours from doses of all other medications, including supplements such as iron. Divalent cations, including iron, can decrease absorption of bisphosphonates by forming insoluble complexes in the gastrointestinal tract (15).

CHLORAMPHENICOL Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking chloramphenicol with iron might reduce the response to iron therapy in iron deficiency anemia.  Details Chloramphenicol interferes with erythrocyte maturation (15,3046). However, since chloramphenicol isn't usually taken for prolonged periods, this isn't likely to be clinically significant.

DOLUTEGRAVIR (Tivicay) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Iron might decrease dolutegravir levels by reducing its absorption.  Details Advise patients to take dolutegravir at least 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking iron. Pharmacokinetic research shows that iron can decrease the absorption of dolutegravir from the gastrointestinal tract through chelation (93578). When taken under fasting conditions, a single dose of ferrous fumarate 324 mg orally along with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces overall exposure to dolutegravir by 54% (94190).

INTEGRASE INHIBITORS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking iron along with integrase inhibitors might decrease the levels and clinical effects of these drugs.  Details Iron is a divalent cation. There is concern that iron may decrease the absorption of integrase inhibitors from the gastrointestinal tract through chelation (93578). One pharmacokinetic study shows that iron can decrease blood levels of the specific integrase inhibitor dolutegravir through chelation (94190). Also, other pharmacokinetic research shows that other divalent cations such as calcium can decrease the absorption and levels of some integrase inhibitors through chelation (93578,93579).

LEVODOPA Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Iron might decrease levodopa levels by reducing its absorption.  Details Advise patients to separate doses of levodopa and iron as much as possible. There is some evidence in healthy people that iron forms chelates with levodopa, reducing the amount of levodopa absorbed by around 50% (9567). The clinical significance of this hasn't been determined.

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Iron might decrease levothyroxine levels by reducing its absorption.  Details Advise patients to separate levothyroxine and iron doses by at least 2 hours. Iron can decrease the absorption and efficacy of levothyroxine by forming insoluble complexes in the gastrointestinal tract (9568).

METHYLDOPA (Aldomet) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Iron might decrease methyldopa levels by reducing its absorption.  Details Advise patients to separate methyldopa and iron doses by at least 2 hours. Iron can decrease the absorption of methyldopa from the gastrointestinal tract through chelation, resulting in increases in blood pressure (7900,20151).

MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL (CellCept) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, iron might decrease mycophenolate mofetil levels by reducing its absorption.  Details Advise patients to take iron 4-6 hours before, or 2 hours after, mycophenolate mofetil. It has been suggested that a decrease of absorption is possible, probably by forming nonabsorbable chelates. However, mycophenolate pharmacokinetics are not affected by iron supplementation in available clinical research (3046,20152,20153,20154,20155).

PENICILLAMINE (Cuprimine, Depen) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Iron might decrease penicillamine levels by reducing its absorption.  Details Advise patients to separate penicillamine and iron doses by at least 2 hours. Oral iron supplements can reduce absorption of penicillamine by 30% to 70%, probably due to chelate formation. In people with Wilson's disease, this interaction has led to reduced efficacy of penicillamine (3046,3072,20156).

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Iron might decrease levels of quinolone antibiotics by reducing their absorption.  Details Advise patients to separate quinolone antibiotics and iron doses by at least 2 hours. Iron decreases the absorption of quinolones due to formation of insoluble complexes in the gastrointestinal tract (15,3072).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Iron might decrease levels of tetracycline antibiotics by reducing their absorption.  Details Advise patients to take iron at least 2 hours before or 4 hours after tetracycline antibiotics. Concomitant use can decrease absorption of tetracycline antibiotics from the gastrointestinal tract by 50% to 90% (15).

(Read more about IRON)

(Read more about PEA PROTEIN)

ACE INHIBITORS (ACEIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Using ACEIs with high doses of potassium increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details ACEIs block the actions of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and reduce potassium excretion (95628). Concomitant use of these drugs with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15,23207). However, concomitant use of these drugs with moderate dietary potassium intake (about 3775-5200 mg daily) does not increase serum potassium levels (95628).

ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKERS (ARBs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Using ARBs with high doses of potassium increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details ARBs block the actions of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and reduce potassium excretion (95628). Concomitant use of these drugs with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15,23207). However, concomitant use of these drugs with moderate dietary potassium intake (about 3775-5200 mg daily) does not increase serum potassium levels (95628).

POTASSIUM-SPARING DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Concomitant use increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details Using potassium-sparing diuretics with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Pumpkin might reduce excretion and increase levels of lithium.  Details Pumpkin is thought to have diuretic properties (92383). Theoretically, this might reduce excretion and increase levels of lithium. The dose of lithium might need to be decreased.

(Read more about PUMPKIN)

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Taking sesame oil with antidiabetes drugs might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.  Details Clinical studies show that sesame oil can decrease plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Some clinical research in patients taking glibenclamide shows that using sesame oil or a blend of sesame oil and rice bran oil in place of other oil for cooking reduces plasma glucose more than glibenclamide alone (27654,28139,96177,108350,108352,108355). Monitor blood glucose levels closely. Dose adjustments might be necessary.

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Taking sesame oil with antihypertensive drugs might increase the risk of hypotension.  Details Clinical research shows that replacing other cooking oil with sesame oil can lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in patients with or without hypertension. There is also some evidence that sesame oil has additive effects in patients also taking atenolol, nifedipine, and/or hydrochlorothiazide (27652,27654,27655,96179,108355,108357). In patients using nifedipine, using a blend of sesame oil and rice bran oil for cooking reduces both SBP and DBP more than nifedipine alone (96180).

CYTOCHROME P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, sesame might increase the levels and clinical effects of CYP2C9 substrates.  Details In vitro, sesame inhibits CYP2C9 (11028). However, this interaction has not been reported in humans.

P-GLYCOPROTEIN SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, sesame might alter the transport of P-glycoprotein substrates.  Details In vitro research suggests that sesamin, a constituent of sesame, can inhibit the multi-drug transporter protein, P-glycoprotein (28319,28320). However, this interaction has not been reported in humans.

TAMOXIFEN (Nolvadex) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, sesame might interfere with tamoxifen.  Details In animal research, sesame seed reduces the tumor-inhibitory effect of tamoxifen by reducing apoptosis and increasing proliferation (28110,28111). This interaction has not been reported in humans.

(Read more about SESAME)

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = A Theoretically, a high intake of dietary sodium might reduce the effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs.  Details High intake of dietary sodium can increase systolic and diastolic blood pressure (26222). Also, high intake of sodium may necessitate increased use of antihypertensive medications to achieve blood pressure control in some patients, such as those with chronic kidney disease (26223).

CORTICOSTEROIDS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids with sodium supplements might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids (corticosteroids) cause sodium retention. This effect is dose-related and depends on mineralocorticoid potency. It is most common with hydrocortisone, cortisone, and fludrocortisone, followed by prednisone and prednisolone (4425).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Altering dietary intake of sodium might alter the levels and clinical effects of lithium.  Details High sodium intake can reduce plasma concentrations of lithium by increasing lithium excretion (26225). Reducing sodium intake can significantly increase plasma concentrations of lithium and cause lithium toxicity in patients being treated with lithium carbonate (26224,26225). Stabilizing sodium intake is shown to reduce the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L (112909). Patients taking lithium should avoid significant alterations in their dietary intake of sodium.

SODIUM-CONTAINING DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of sodium-containing drugs with additional sodium from dietary or supplemental sources may increase the risk of hypernatremia and long-term sodium-related complications.  Details The Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams of sodium daily indicates the intake at which it is believed that chronic disease risk increases for the apparently healthy population (100310). Some medications contain high quantities of sodium. When used in conjunction with sodium supplements or high-sodium diets, the CDRR may be exceeded. Additionally, concomitant use may increase the risk for hypernatremia; this risk is highest in the elderly and people with other risk factors for electrolyte disturbances.

TOLVAPTAN (Samsca) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, concomitant use of tolvaptan with sodium might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Tolvaptan is a vasopressin receptor 2 antagonist that is used to increase sodium levels in patients with hyponatremia (29406). Patients taking tolvaptan should use caution with the use of sodium salts such as sodium chloride.

(Read more about SODIUM)

General ...Orally and intravenously, calcium is well-tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Belching, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, and stomach upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about calciphylaxis and kidney stones.

Cardiovascular ...There has been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these results, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and CVD, CHD, or MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482). To minimize the possible risk of CVD, CHD, or MI, advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). While dietary intake of calcium is preferred over supplemental intake, advise patients who require calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D, as this combination does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI (93533).
Rarely, calcium intake can increase the risk of calciphylaxis, which usually occurs in patients with kidney failure. Calciphylaxis is the deposition of calcium phosphate in arterioles, which causes skin ulcers and skin necrosis. In a case report, a 64-year-old female with a history of neck fracture, sepsis, and ischemic colitis presented with painful leg ulcers due to calciphylaxis. She discontinued calcium and vitamin D supplementation and was treated with sodium thiosulfate and supportive care (95816).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, calcium can cause belching, flatulence, nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, and diarrhea (1824,1843,12950,38803). Although constipation is frequently cited as an adverse effect of calcium, there is no scientific substantiation of this side effect (1824,1843,1844,1845,12950,38978). Calcium carbonate has been reported to cause acid rebound, but this is controversial (12935,12936).

Oncologic ...There is some concern that very high doses of calcium might increase the risk of prostate cancer. Some epidemiological evidence suggests that consuming over 2000 mg/day of dietary calcium might increase the risk for prostate cancer (4825,12949). Additional research suggests that calcium intake over 1500 mg/day might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer and prostate cancer mortality (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a small increase in prostate cancer risk (98894). However, contradictory research suggests no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall prostate cancer risk (14131,14132,104630). More evidence is needed to determine the effect of calcium, if any, on prostate cancer risk.

Renal ...Kidney stones have been reported in individuals taking calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily in combination with vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 4 years (93943).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

General ...Orally or intravenously, iron is generally well tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, gastrointestinal irritation, nausea, and vomiting.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about oral or gastric ulcerations.
Intravenously: Case reports have raised concerns about hypophosphatemia and osteomalacia.

Cardiovascular ...There is debate regarding the association between coronary heart disease (CHD) or myocardial infarction (MI) and high iron intake or high body iron stores. Some observational studies have reported that high body iron stores are associated with increased risk of MI and CHD (1492,9542,9544,9545,15175). Some observational studies reported that only high heme iron intake from dietary sources such as red meat are associated with increased risk of MI and CHD (1492,9546,15174,15205,15206,91180). However, the majority of research has found no association between serum iron levels and cardiovascular disease (1097,1099,9543,9547,9548,9549,9550,56469,56683).
There is one case of Kounis syndrome, also referred to as allergic angina or allergic myocardial infarction, in a 39-year-old female patient without previous coronary artery disease given intravenous ferric carboxymaltose. The patient experienced anaphylactic symptoms, including headache, abdominal pain, and breathing difficulties, 3 minutes after starting the infusion. She was further diagnosed with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (112607).

Dermatologic ...Cutaneous hemosiderosis, or skin staining, has been reported following intravenous iron infusion in various case reports. Most of these cases are due to extravasation following iron infusion (112605,112611). In one case, extravasation has occurred following iron derisomaltose infusion in a 41-year-old female with chronic kidney disease (112605). Rarely, diffuse cutaneous hermosiderosis has occurred. In one case, a 31-year-old female with excessive sweating developed cutaneous hemosiderosis in the armpits following an intravenous iron polymaltose infusion (112611).

Endocrine ...Population research in females shows that higher ferritin levels are associated with an approximately 1. 5-fold higher odds of developing gestational diabetes. Increased dietary intake of heme-iron, but not non-heme iron, is also associated with an increased risk for gestational diabetes. The effects of iron supplementation could not be determined from the evaluated research (96618). However, in a sub-analysis of a large clinical trial in pregnant adults, daily supplementation with iron 100 mg from 14 weeks gestation until delivery did not affect the frequency or severity of glucose intolerance or gestational weight gain (96619).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, iron can cause dry mouth, gastrointestinal irritation, heartburn, abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting (96621,102864,104680,104684,110179,110185,110188,110189,110192). These adverse effects are uncommon at doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 45 mg per day of elemental iron in adults with normal iron stores (7135). Higher doses can be taken safely in adults with iron deficiency, but gastrointestinal side effects may occur (1095,20118,20119,56698,102864). Taking iron supplements with food seems to reduce gastrointestinal side effects (7135). However, food can also significantly reduce iron absorption. Iron should be taken on an empty stomach, unless it cannot be tolerated.
There are several formulations of iron products such as ferrous sulfate, ferrous gluconate, ferrous fumarate, and others. Manufacturers of some formulations, such as polysaccharide-iron complex products (Niferex-150, etc), claim to be better tolerated than other formulations; however, there is no reliable evidence to support this claim. Gastrointestinal tolerability relates mostly to the elemental iron dose rather than the formulation (17500).
Enteric-coated or controlled-release iron formulations might reduce nausea for some patients, however, these products also have lower absorption rates (17500).
Liquid oral preparations can blacken and stain teeth (20118).
Iron can also cause oral ulcerations and ulcerations of the gastric mucosa (56684,91182,96622,110179). In one case report, an 87-year-old female with Alzheimer disease experienced a mucosal ulceration, possibly due to holding a crushed ferrous sulfate 80 mg tablet in the mouth for too long prior to swallowing (91182). The ulceration was resolved after discontinuing iron supplementation. In another case report, a 76-year old male suffered gastric mucosal injury after taking a ferrous sulfate tablet daily for 4 years (56684). In a third case report, a 14-year-old female developed gastritis involving symptoms of upper digestive hemorrhage, nausea, melena, and stomach pain. The hemorrhage was attributed to supplementation with ferrous sulfate 2 hours after meals for the prior 2 weeks (96622). In one case report, a 43-year old female developed atrophic gastritis with non-bleeding ulcerations five days after starting oral ferrous sulfate 325 mg twice daily (110179).
Intravenously, iron can cause gastrointestinal symptoms sch as nausea (104684,110192).

Immunologic ...Although there is some clinical research associating iron supplementation with an increased rate of malaria infection (56796,95432), the strongest evidence to date does not support this association, at least for areas where antimalarial treatment is available (95433,96623). In an analysis of 14 trials, iron supplementation was not associated with an increased risk of malaria (96623). In a sub-analysis of 7 preliminary clinical studies, the effect of iron supplementation was dependent upon the access to services for antimalarial treatment. In areas where anemia is common and services are available, iron supplementation is associated with a 9% reduced risk of clinical malaria. In an area where services are unavailable, iron supplementation was associated with a 16% increased risk in malaria incidence (96623). The difference in these findings is likely associated with the use of malaria prevention methods.
A meta-analysis of clinical studies of all patient populations shows that administering IV iron, usually iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose, increases the risk of infection by 16% when compared with oral iron or no iron. However, sub-analyses suggest this increased risk is limited to patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (110186).
Intravenously, iron has rarely resulted in allergic reactions, including anaphylactoid reactions (110185,110192,112606,112607). There is one case of Kounis syndrome, also referred to as allergic angina or allergic myocardial infarction, in a 39-year-old female patient without previous coronary artery disease given intravenous ferric carboxymaltose. The patient experienced anaphylactic symptoms, including headache, abdominal pain, and breathing difficulties, 3 minutes after starting the infusion. She was further diagnosed with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (112607).

Musculoskeletal ...Intravenously, iron rarely results in osteomalacia related to hypophosphatemia (112609). At least 2 cases exist of hypophosphatemic osteomalacia. In one case, a 70-year-old male with a genetic hemorrhagic disorder infused with ferric carboxymaltose developed lower limb pain with hypophosphatemia and diffuse bone demineralization in the feet (112609). In a second case, a 61-year-old male developed femoral neck insufficiency fractures following repeated ferric carboxymaltose transfusions for anemia related to vascular malformation in the bowel (112603). Severe hypophosphatemia requiring intravenous phosphate in the absence of osteomalacia has also occurred following intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (112608,112610).

Oncologic ...There is a debate regarding the association between high levels of iron stores and cancer. Data are conflicting and inconclusive (1098,1099,1100,1102). Epidemiological studies suggest that increased body iron stores may increase the risk of cancer or general mortality (56703).
Occupational exposure to iron may be carcinogenic (56691). Oral exposure to iron may also be carcinogenic. Pooled analyses of population studies suggest that increasing the intake of heme iron increases the risk of colorectal cancer. For example, increasing heme iron intake by 1 mg/day is associated with an 11% increase in risk (56699,91185).

Other ...Intravenously, sodium ferric gluconate complex (SFGC) caused drug intolerance reactions in 0. 4% of hemodialysis patients including 2 patients with pruritus and one patient each with anaphylactoid reaction, hypotension, chills, back pain, dyspnea/chest pain, facial flushing, rash and cutaneous symptoms of porphyria (56527).

(Read more about IRON)

General ...Orally, pea protein seems to be well tolerated.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Anaphylaxis in sensitive individuals.

Immunologic ...Orally, pea protein may cause allergic reactions in individuals sensitive to other foods. A case series describes 6 children who had anaphylactic reactions to pea protein present in a number of food items. Other symptoms included angioedema, urticaria, and asthma. All the children had a history of allergies to other foods including peanuts, tree nuts, chickpeas, lentils, or kidney beans (102012).

(Read more about PEA PROTEIN)

General ...Orally or intravenously, potassium is generally well-tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, belching, diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, and vomiting.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
All ROAs: High potassium levels can cause arrhythmia, heart block, hypotension, and mental confusion.

Cardiovascular ...Orally or intravenously, high potassium levels can cause hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, heart block, or cardiac arrest (15,16,3385,95011,95626,95630).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally or intravenously, high doses of potassium can cause, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and flatulence (95010,95011). Bleeding duodenal ulcers have also been associated with ingestion of slow-release potassium tablets (69625,69672).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally or intravenously, high potassium levels can cause paresthesia, generalized weakness, flaccid paralysis, listlessness, vertigo, or mental confusion (15,16,3385,95011).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

General ...Orally, pumpkin products are generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal discomfort, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Anaphylaxis.

Dermatologic ...There are two case reports of adult females developing substantial transient hair loss 1-3 weeks after consumption of a meal containing either bitter-tasting pumpkin or undefined squash. This adverse effect was attributed to a high concentration of cucurbitacin, which is commonly found in wild pumpkins (104535).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, pumpkin seed oil has been reported to cause mild abdominal discomfort in clinical trials (5093,92378). There are also two case reports of adults developing severe nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea following consumption of a meal containing either bitter-tasting pumpkin or undefined squash. These adverse effects were attributed to a high concentration of cucurbitacin, which is commonly found in wild pumpkins (104535).

Immunologic ...Orally, pumpkin seed oil and pumpkin pulp have been reported to cause anaphylactic reactions in children and adults. A case review highlights 4 cases of anaphylaxis in children (3 from pumpkin pulp, 1 from pumpkin seeds), and 7 cases in adults (1 from pumpkin flesh, 6 from pumpkin seeds). Symptoms of anaphylaxis include urticaria, angioedema of the lips or face, dyspnea, dysphagia, and oropharyngeal itching and swelling. A case report describes a 2-year-old male presenting with urticaria, swollen lips, and increased dyspnea 10 minutes after ingesting pumpkin seeds. The patient was found to have elevated allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) and a positive skin-prick test for pumpkin seeds. Symptoms resolved after treatment with epinephrine, systemic glucocorticoids, salbuterol, and antihistamines (107843).
There may also be concern for allergic reaction due to inhalation or topical exposure. One case report describes an 8-year-old child developing anaphylaxis while carving a pumpkin; another highlights that inhalation of pumpkin seed flour may have potentiated anaphylaxis in 3 individuals following the ingestion of pumpkin seeds (107843). Further research is necessary to assess the relationship between anaphylaxis and route of administration.

(Read more about PUMPKIN)

General ...Orally, topically, or intranasally, sesame seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
All routes of administration: Allergic reactions.

Dermatologic ...In a small clinical study, one patient using a cream containing sesame oil as well as aqueous extracts of guggul and Allium ampeloprasum complained of rash at the application site (105751). It is unclear if this reaction was due to sesame, other ingredients, or other factors.

Gastrointestinal ...There was a single case of diarrhea associated with oral sesame in a clinical trial (108356).

Immunologic ...Multiple cases of allergic response to sesame seed occurring after occupational, topical, intramuscular, or oral exposure have been reported (28157,28158,28159,28160,28161,28162,28163,28166,28167,28183)(28184,28185,28186,28188,108348). One study found that up to 0.5% of the United States population reports having a sesame allergy, and 0.23% of the population meets criteria for an IgE-mediated allergic reaction to sesame (100501). Allergic symptoms may be dermatologic, such as angioedema (28160,28167,108348), cheilitis (28207), dermatitis (28157,28166,28182,28185,28186), edema (28159), erythema (28167), pruritis (28167,108348), purpura (28188), flushing (108348), and urticaria (28159,28160,28162,108348); musculoskeletal (28188); respiratory, such as asthma (28159,28162), rhinitis (28162), wheezing (28167), and general breathing difficulties (108348); gastrointestinal, such as vomiting (28159,108348); and others such as conjunctivitis (28159), anaphylactic shock (28157,28159,28160,28167,28177,28178,28179,28180,28204,108348), and hemodynamic modifications (28169). In Canada, sesame accounted for 4% of pediatric food-induced anaphylaxis reactions presenting to emergency departments over a 10-year period. The majority of cases were mild to moderate in severity and occurred within 2 hours of exposure; however, about 3% occurred 2-8 hours after exposure. Epinephrine was the most common treatment, followed by antihistamines, inhaled beta-agonists, and corticosteroids (108348).
Approximately one-third of patients with IgE-mediated sesame allergy have reported previous use of epinephrine due to this allergy (100501). There is evidence that IgE-mediated sesame allergy is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors; there was a high correlation of the allergy between family members, especially siblings (28175).
Allergens believed to be responsible for sesame seed hypersensitivity include beta-globulin (28213); sesamol, sesamolin, and sesamin (28182,28207); storage proteins including ses i 1 and ses i 2 (2S albumins) (28132,28187,28211,28212,28216,28217), ses i 3 (a 7S vicilin-type globulin) (28187,28214), ses i 4 (28158), ses i 5 (28158), ses i 6 (an 11S globulin) (28132,28215), and ses i 7 (28215). Typically allergens in sesame seeds that cause reactions after oral intake have molecular weights ranging from 8-62 kDa (28208,28210).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...In clinical trials involving a sesame oil nasal spray, minor adverse effects included adverse smell, oil dripping from the nose, and nasal blockage (27659).

(Read more about SESAME)

General ...Orally, sodium is well tolerated when used in moderation at intakes up to the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level. Topically, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Worsened cardiovascular disease, hypertension, kidney disease.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, intake of sodium above the CDRR intake level can exacerbate hypertension and hypertension-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) (26229,98176,100310,106263). A meta-analysis of observational research has found a linear association between increased sodium intake and increased hypertension risk (109398). Observational research has also found an association between increased sodium salt intake and increased risk of CVD, mortality, and cardiovascular mortality (98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,109395,109396,109399). However, the existing research is unable to confirm a causal relationship between sodium intake and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; high-quality, prospective research is needed to clarify this relationship (100312). As there is no known benefit with increased salt intake that would outweigh the potential increased risk of CVD, advise patients to limit salt intake to no more than the CDRR intake level (100310).
A reduction in sodium intake can lower systolic blood pressure by a small amount in most individuals, and diastolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension (100310,100311,106261). However, post hoc analysis of a small crossover clinical study in White patients suggests that 24-hour blood pressure variability is not affected by high-salt intake compared with low-salt intake (112910). Additionally, the available research is insufficient to confirm that a further reduction in sodium intake below the CDRR intake level will lower the risk for chronic disease (100310,100311). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that reducing sodium intake increases levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides, but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, by a small amount (106261).
It is unclear whether there are safety concerns when sodium is consumed in amounts lower than the adequate intake (AI) levels. Some observational research has found that the lowest levels of sodium intake might be associated with increased risk of death and cardiovascular events (98181,98183). However, this finding has been criticized because some of the studies used inaccurate measures of sodium intake, such as the Kawasaki formula (98177,98178,101259). Some observational research has found that sodium intake based on a single 24-hour urinary measurement is inversely correlated with all-cause mortality (106260). The National Academies Consensus Study Report states that there is insufficient evidence from observational studies to conclude that there are harmful effects from low sodium intake (100310).

Endocrine ...Orally, a meta-analysis of observational research has found that higher sodium intake is associated with an average increase in body mass index (BMI) of 1. 24 kg/m2 and an approximate 5 cm increase in waist circumference (98182). It has been hypothesized that the increase in BMI is related to an increased thirst, resulting in an increased intake of sugary beverages and/or consumption of foods that are high in salt and also high in fat and energy (98182). One large observational study has found that the highest sodium intake is not associated with overweight or obesity when compared to the lowest intake in adolescents aged 12-19 years when intake of energy and sugar-sweetened beverages are considered (106265). However, in children aged 6-11 years, usual sodium intake is positively associated with increased weight and central obesity independently of the intake of energy and/or sugar-sweetened beverages (106265).

Gastrointestinal ...In one case report, severe gastritis and a deep antral ulcer occurred in a patient who consumed 16 grams of sodium chloride in one sitting (25759). Chronic use of high to moderately high amounts of sodium chloride has been associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer (29405).

Musculoskeletal ...Observational research has found that low sodium levels can increase the risk for osteoporosis. One study has found that low plasma sodium levels are associated with an increased risk for osteoporosis. Low levels, which are typically caused by certain disease states or chronic medications, are associated with a more than 2-fold increased odds for osteoporosis and bone fractures (101260).
Conversely, in healthy males on forced bed rest, a high intake of sodium chloride (7.7 mEq/kg daily) seems to exacerbate disuse-induced bone and muscle loss (25760,25761).

Oncologic ...Population research has found that high or moderately high intake of sodium chloride is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer when compared with low sodium chloride intake (29405). Other population research in patients with gastric cancer has found that a high intake of sodium is associated with an approximate 65% increased risk of gastric cancer mortality when compared with a low intake. When zinc intake is taken into consideration, the increased risk of mortality only occurred in those with low zinc intake, but the risk was increased to approximately 2-fold in this sub-population (109400).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...In patients with hypertension, population research has found that sodium excretion is modestly and positively associated with having moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea. This association was not found in normotensive patients (106262).

Renal ...Increased sodium intake has been associated with impaired kidney function in healthy adults. This effect seems to be independent of blood pressure. Observational research has found that a high salt intake over approximately 5 years is associated with a 29% increased risk of developing impaired kidney function when compared with a lower salt intake. In this study, high salt intake was about 2-fold higher than low salt intake (101261).

(Read more about SODIUM)