Eye Rite [Discontinued] by Orthoplex

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Night vision. Most research suggests that oral bilberry does not improve night vision in healthy individuals. Details: There is contradictory evidence about the effectiveness of bilberry for improving night vision; however, much of the research is of poor quality. In general, the most rigorous research shows that bilberry is not effective for improving night vision in healthy individuals (8139,9739,14280,35446). Whether bilberry can improve night vision in patients with night blindness is unclear.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. Oral bilberry has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study of elderly Norwegian males with subjective cognitive impairment shows that drinking 330 mL of bilberry and red grape juice twice daily for 9 weeks does not improve measures of memory or motor skills when compared with placebo (110641).
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Although there has been interest in using oral bilberry for AMD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bilberry for this purpose.
• Asthenopia (eye strain). Small clinical studies suggest that oral bilberry fruit extract may improve objective measures of asthenopia, but it is unclear if oral bilberry improves subjective symptoms of asthenopia. Details: Two small clinical studies in adults who report general eye strain or those who look at computer or other display screens at work for long periods of time show that taking bilberry-derived anthocyanins 43.2 mg daily for 6 weeks or bilberry extract 240 mg daily for 12 weeks improves objective measures of eye strain after staring at computer screens when compared with placebo (103190,104195). However, bilberry extract did not improve subjective measures of eye strain in the study that evaluated these outcomes (104195). This study may have been underpowered to detect significant differences between groups. Bilberry has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients for improving eye strain. A small clinical trial in patients with eye strain shows that a combination of fish oil, lutein, and bilberry extract containing bilberry anthocyanidins 59 mg, taken daily for 4 weeks, reduces dry eye, lower back pain, shoulder stiffness, and stuffy head when compared with placebo (35470). It is unclear if these effects are due to bilberry, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Atherosclerosis. Although there has been interest in using oral bilberry for atherosclerosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bilberry for this purpose.
• Cataracts. Although there has been interest in using oral bilberry for cataracts, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bilberry for this purpose.
• Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). It is unclear if oral bilberry is beneficial in patients with CVI. Details: One small clinical study in patients with CVI shows that taking bilberry extract containing anthocyanins 173 mg daily for 30 days reduces symptoms of CVI when compared with placebo (35510).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral bilberry is beneficial in patients with diabetes. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking a specific extract of bilberry fruit (Mirtoselect, Indena S.p.A) 470 mg once, prior to taking an oral glucose tolerance test, lowers plasma glucose levels when compared with placebo (91507). However, a small crossover trial in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking bilberry fruit extract 700 mg twice daily for 4 weeks does not improve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight, blood pressure, or lipid levels when compared with placebo (104194). The validity of the HbA1c-related findings is limited due to the short study duration.
• Diabetic retinopathy. It is unclear if oral bilberry is beneficial in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Details: One small clinical trial in adults with diabetic and hypertensive retinopathy shows that taking bilberry fruit extract 160 mg daily for 6 months, in addition to standard management, improves edema and measures of retinal circulatory health when compared with standard management alone. Bilberry in the form of a generic, commercially available product appears to produce less dramatic improvements than a branded formulation (Mirtoselect, Indena S.p.A.) containing matching anthocyanin content. This specific product also reduced flow velocity in those with high-flow, diabetic retinopathy when compared with either the generic bilberry extract or standard management alone (97032).
• Dry eye. Oral bilberry has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with severe dry eye symptoms suggests that taking bilberry extract 600 mg and docosahexaenoic fish oil 240 mg once daily for 3 months may modestly improve measures of tear quality and patient-reported scores for dry eye symptoms when compared with control (112415). However, the validity of these results is limited by the lack of a statistical comparison between groups. Additionally, it is unclear if these effects are due to bilberry, fish oil, or the combination.
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral bilberry is beneficial in patients with dysmenorrhea. Details: One small clinical study in patients with dysmenorrhea shows that a specific bilberry product (Tegens) containing bilberry anthocyanoside 160 mg, taken twice daily beginning 3 days prior to menses and continuing for 8 days, reduces pelvic pain, lumbosacral pain, breast pain, nausea, vomiting, and headache when compared with placebo (35512).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral bilberry is beneficial for reducing exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: A small clinical study in trained athletes shows that drinking 200 mL of bilberry juice, containing about 744 mg phenols and 80 mg anthocyanins, twice daily for 5 days prior to running a half-marathon modestly worsens muscle soreness immediately after the run when compared with placebo. There was no longer a difference in muscle soreness between groups within 1-2 days after the run (99540).
• Glaucoma. Small clinical studies suggest that oral bilberry fruit extract, when taken with maritime pine extract, may lower intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma. It is unclear if oral bilberry alone is beneficial in patients with glaucoma. Details: One small, uncontrolled clinical trial in Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma shows that taking a specific product (Sante Glagenox, Saten Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.) containing bilberry fruit extract 90 mg and maritime pine extract 40 mg daily for 4 weeks reduces intraocular pressure by 8.7% when compared to baseline (104192). Another small clinical study in patients with high intraocular pressure shows that taking a specific product (Mirtogenol) containing bilberry fruit extract (Mirtoselect, Indena S.p.A.) 80 mg and maritime pine extract (Pycnogenol, Horphag Research) 40 mg twice daily for 6 months lowers intraocular pressure and improves intraocular blood flow when compared with no treatment (35456). It is unclear if these findings are due to bilberry, maritime pine, or the combination. A retrospective chart review of patients with normal tension glaucoma has found that taking bilberry anthocyanin 60 mg twice daily for at least 12 months is associated with improvements in visual function when compared to pretreatment (35472).
• Hemorrhoids. Although there has been interest in using oral bilberry for hemorrhoids, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bilberry for this purpose.
• Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear if oral bilberry is beneficial in patients with hyperlipidemia. Details: A small clinical study in adults with hyperlipidemia shows that taking bilberry-derived anthocyanins 320 mg daily for 4 weeks does not improve total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglyceride levels. Further, no improvements in other biomarkers of cardiovascular disease were reported (110640). The validity of this study is limited by its short duration.
• Hypertension. Oral bilberry has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study in adults with hypertension shows that consuming 500 mL of a juice containing bilberry, red grape, and chokeberry, with or without black currant (MANA Blue, TINE SA), daily for 12 weeks does not improve blood pressure when compared with placebo (92371).
• Hypertensive retinopathy. It is unclear if oral bilberry is beneficial in patients with hypertensive retinopathy. Details: One small clinical trial in adults with diabetic and hypertensive retinopathy shows that taking bilberry fruit extract 160 mg daily for 6 months, in addition to standard management, improves edema and measures of retinal circulatory health when compared with standard management alone. Bilberry in the form of a generic, commercially available product appears to produce less dramatic improvements than a branded formulation (Mirtoselect, Indena S.p.A.) containing matching anthocyanin content. This specific product also increased flow velocity for those with ischemic, hypertensive retinopathy when compared with either the generic bilberry extract or standard management alone (97032).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). Oral bilberry has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults with impaired glucose tolerance and two markers of metabolic syndrome shows that consuming a diet high in whole grain products, fatty fish, and bilberries three times daily for 12 weeks reduces levels of plasma glucose when compared to baseline (35468). However, it is unclear if these findings are due to bilberry, another component of the diet, or the combination.
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Oral bilberry has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical trial in adults with IBS shows that consuming a formula containing powdered bilberry fruit, aerial agrimony parts, cinnamon quills, and slippery elm bark modestly improves bowel movement frequency and reduces symptoms such as abdominal pain, bloating, flatulence, and straining when compared to baseline (35462). It is unclear if these findings are due to bilberry, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral bilberry is beneficial in patients with metabolic syndrome. Details: One small clinical study in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that consuming a diet containing 400 grams of fresh bilberries daily does not affect body weight, glucose metabolism, or lipid metabolism when compared with a control diet (35473).
• Myopia. It is unclear if oral bilberry is beneficial in patients with myopia. Details: One small clinical trial in adults with myopia shows that a specific fermented bilberry fruit extract (Fermented Blueberry, Ajinomoto, Co., Inc.) 200 mg, taken twice daily for 4 weeks, improves night vision as well as the eye's ability to adjust focus when compared with placebo. The amplitude of accommodation was also significantly increased from 4.62 to 5.33 (91505).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral bilberry is beneficial in patients with obesity. Details: One small clinical study in obese and overweight females shows that consuming 100 grams of frozen, whole bilberries daily for 33-35 days decreases weight and waist circumference when compared to baseline (35463). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Osteoarthritis. Although there has been interest in using oral bilberry for osteoarthritis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bilberry for this purpose.
• Ulcerative colitis. It is unclear if oral bilberry is beneficial in patients with ulcerative colitis. Details: One small, open-label clinical study in adults with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis shows that consuming sieved bilberries and concentrated bilberry juice (Symrise GmbH & Co) 160 grams daily for 6 weeks induces remission in 46% of patients. Furthermore, 91% of patients achieved remission at the end of treatment, and 72% of patients achieved remission at the end of the study (91506). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Although there has been interest in using oral bilberry for UTIs, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bilberry for this purpose.
• Varicose veins. Although there has been interest in using oral bilberry for varicose veins, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bilberry for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate bilberry for these uses.

(Read more about BILBERRY)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). When used alone or in combination with other ingredients, oral lutein seems to improve some aspects of vision in patient with AMD. However, it does not seem to slow the progression of AMD. Details: Epidemiological research has found that people who consume higher amounts of lutein plus zeaxanthin in the diet have a reduced risk of developing AMD (219,2394,60238,106353). The association between intake of lutein specifically and the development of AMD is not clear; however, dietary lutein levels are much higher than dietary zeaxanthin levels. Although one study found no association between increased dietary lutein consumption and a reduced risk for age-related maculopathy, people in this study already had high lutein intake at baseline (14007). Some research has assessed whether lutein supplements can reduce symptoms and progression of existing AMD. Clinical research, including pooled analyses, in adults with AMD shows that taking supplemental lutein 10-20 mg daily for up to 36 months modestly improves some aspects of vision, such as macular pigment optical density, the ability of the eyes to adapt to varying light conditions (glare recovery), the ability to see details of near objects (near vision acuity), and the ability to see under low-contrast conditions (contrast sensitivity) (11798,48213,60185,60242,60245,60268,60270,60280,90678,91160)(91165,97225,102887,106366). Meta-analyses of these and other studies shows that taking lutein or a related xanthophyll carotenoid (zeaxanthin or meso-zeaxanthin) improves macular optical density when compared with placebo in patients with or without AMD. Treatment duration of at least 3 months, doses greater than 5 mg, and/or combination treatment with all three carotenoids are associated with a greater improvement in macular optical density (97225,106366). However, lutein supplements do not appear to affect the progression of AMD (60281). A meta-analysis of 6 studies shows that taking lutein supplements for 0.5-5 years does not reduce the risk of visual loss or progression to late-stage AMD when compared with placebo (95839). Lutein has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients, with conflicting findings. Although not all research agrees, lutein-containing combination supplements might improve some symptoms of AMD (19196,60134,60180,60207,60237,60244,97226). A specific supplement (AZYR SIFI) containing lutein 10 mg, vitamin C 180 mg, vitamin E 30 mg, zinc 22.5 mg, copper 1 mg, zeaxanthin 1 mg, and astaxanthin 4 mg has been used daily for 1-2 years in some research with moderate evidence of benefit (19196,60244). Taking lutein 10 mg plus zeaxanthin 2 mg in addition to the original Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) formulation (vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc) does not seem to prevent the progression to advanced AMD more than the AREDS formulation alone. However, this progression was modestly inhibited in individuals with low dietary intakes of lutein and zeaxanthin. While progression to late AMD was only modestly inhibited at 5 years when these doses of lutein and zeaxanthin were included in a revised formulation devoid of beta-carotene (AREDS2) (60281), results of an additional 5 years of follow up showed that this revised formulation reduces the risk of progression to late AMD by 15% when compared with the formulation containing beta-carotene (108615). In first-generation offspring of parents with neovascular AMD, taking lutein 10 mg, zeaxanthin 2 mg, vitamin C 180 mg, vitamin E 30 mg, zinc 15 mg, and copper 1 mg daily for 6 months does not improve the macular pigment optical density (106347). Reasons for these discrepancies are not clear but may relate to lutein dose, dietary lutein intake, treatment duration, or the other ingredients included in the combination products.
• Cataracts. Increased dietary lutein seems to reduce the odds of developing cataracts. It is unclear if oral lutein supplementation is beneficial in those who already have cataracts. Details: Observational research and a meta-analysis of this evidence suggests that higher blood levels and/or higher dietary intake of lutein are associated with a 25% lower odds of developing age-related cataracts, and more specifically, a 25% to 27% decreased risk of developing nuclear cataracts (90944,91161,91162,112095). Population research has also found that people who consume higher amounts of lutein (6.9-11.7 mg daily) as part of their diet have a reduced risk of developing severe cataracts that require surgical removal (2395,3219,3220). Clinical research shows that taking lutein 10 mg and zeaxanthin 2 mg per day orally for an average of 4.7 years decreases the risk of needing cataract surgery by 32% in patients with low dietary intake of lutein and zeaxanthin; however, it doesn't benefit patients with higher dietary intake of lutein and zeaxanthin (94703). Some evidence shows that supplemental lutein might benefit patients who already have cataracts. Preliminary clinical research in adults with grade 2 or 3 senile cataracts shows that taking lutein 15 mg orally three times weekly for up to 2 years can improve the ability to see clearly when compared to baseline (60133).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Oral lutein does not seem to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm and low birth weight infants. Details: Clinical research shows that giving preterm and low birth weight infants a specific product (LUTEINofta, SOOFT Italia SpA) containing lutein 0.14 mg and zeaxanthin 0.0006 mg orally once daily, starting at birth and continuing until 36 weeks corrected gestational age, does not decrease the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia when compared with placebo (91163).
• Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Oral lutein does not seem to prevent NEC in preterm and low birth weight infants. Details: Clinical research shows that giving preterm and low birth weight infants a specific product (LUTEINofta, SOOFT Italia SpA) containing lutein 0.14 mg and zeaxanthin 0.0006 mg orally once daily, starting at birth and continuing until 36 weeks corrected gestational age, does not decrease the incidence of NEC when compared with placebo (91163).
• Retinitis pigmentosa. Oral lutein does not seem to improve vision or slow down retinal degeneration in patients with this condition. Details: While some preliminary clinical evidence suggests that oral lutein might be helpful in the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa (10279), most clinical research shows that taking lutein does not improve vision or other markers of retinal degeneration in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (60117,60165,60225).
• Retinopathy of prematurity. Oral lutein does not seem to prevent retinopathy of prematurity in preterm and low birth weight infants. Details: Clinical research in preterm and low birth weight infants shows that giving 0.5 mL or 1.8 mL/kg of a specific product (LUTEINofta, SOOFT Italia SpA) providing lutein 0.14 mg, or giving 0.5 mg/kg plus zeaxanthin 0.0006 mg or 0.02 mg/kg orally once daily, starting at birth and continuing until 36-40 weeks corrected gestational age, does not decrease the incidence or severity of retinopathy of prematurity when compared with placebo (60240,60243,91163,102889).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for attenuating cognitive decline in older adults. Details: Clinical research in adults 40-75 years old shows that taking lutein 10 mg with zeaxanthin 2 mg daily for 6 months improves some, but not all, measures of visual memory when compared with placebo. However, other measures of memory and cognitive function were not improved (109763). Preliminary clinical research in older adults shows that taking the same dose of lutein and zeaxanthin for one year modestly improves some measures of cognitive function, such as complex attention and cognitive flexibility, when compared with placebo (106367). Other preliminary clinical research in older females shows that taking lutein 12 mg alone or with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 800 mg daily for 4 months can improve verbal fluency and memory scores when compared to baseline (48216). Also, some observational research in patients 50 years and older has found that higher dietary lutein and zeaxanthin intake is associated with greater word recall when compared with lower intake (102891). However, clinical research in patients over 60 years old shows that taking lutein 10 mg with zeaxanthin 2 mg daily for 5 years in addition to vitamins C and E, beta-carotene, and zinc (AREDS) does not improve markers of cognitive function, such as memory and verbal fluency, when compared with AREDS alone (94702). More research is needed to determine whether lutein is beneficial for specific measures of cognitive function in older adults.
• Alzheimer disease. Oral lutein has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease shows that taking lutein 10 mg, zeaxanthin 2 mg, meso-zeaxanthin 10 mg, fish oil 1 gram (providing docosahexaenoic acid 500 mg and eicosapentaenoic acid 150 mg), and vitamin E 15 mg (Memory Health) daily for 12 months does not affect disease severity when compared with placebo. However, there were modest increases the number of patients experiencing either an improvement or an attenuated decline in memory and mood (109764). The effect of lutein alone is unclear.
• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for ALS prevention. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of lutein is associated with a 21% lower risk of developing ALS when compared with lower dietary intake (90412). It is unknown if supplemental lutein has any effect on the risk of developing ALS.
• Asthenopia (eye strain). It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for eye strain. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that some combination lutein supplements might reduce symptoms of eye strain. Results from one clinical trial show that taking a combination product containing lutein, zeaxanthin, and black currant extract daily for 2 weeks improves visual fatigue and eye stress when compared with placebo in patients completing a two-hour visual proof reading task (60214). Other clinical research shows that taking lutein 17.5 mg plus omega-3 fatty acids (standardized to contain docosahexaenoic acid 783 mg and eicosapentaenoic acid 162 mg) and bilberry extract (standardized to contain anthocyanidin 59 mg) daily for 4 weeks reduces symptoms of eye strain when compared with placebo (35470). The effect of lutein alone on eye strain is unclear.
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for asthma prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher dietary intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin is associated with up to 30% lower odds of having asthma when compared with a lower dietary intake (109765). The effects of lutein intake alone or lutein supplementation are unclear.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Eating more lutein in the diet seems to reduce the risk of CVD. However, taking oral lutein supplements does not seem to prevent CVD events or mortality. Details: One observational study has found that increased intake of dietary lutein is marginally associated with a reduced risk of developing coronary heart disease (14108). A meta-analysis including this and other studies shows that high dietary lutein intake or high lutein serum concentrations are associated with a 12% reduction in the incidence of coronary heart disease, an 18% reduction in stroke, and a 25% reduction in the incidence of metabolic syndrome when compared with low lutein intake or serum concentrations (97227). However, clinical research shows that taking lutein 10 mg plus zeaxanthin 2 mg daily for an average of 4.8 years does not decrease the risk of CVD-related mortality or cardiovascular events such as stroke, myocardial infarction, or angina when compared with no supplementation in patients 50-85 years old (94701). Unlike the analysis above, individual cardiovascular outcomes were not separately evaluated in this study. The effect of lutein on CVD in younger patients or in doses greater than 10 mg is unknown.
• Central serous retinopathy. Oral lutein has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a supplement containing lutein 15 mg, vitamin C 288 mg, vitamin E 150 IU, zinc 9 mg, and copper 1.2 mg (Sante Lutax 15, Santen Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd) three times daily after meals for 6 months has no effect on mean best-corrected visual acuity, serous retinal detachment, or subfoveal fluid remission when compared with placebo in patients with central serous retinopathy (97224).
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for cervical cancer prevention. Details: Epidemiological research has found that low dietary intake of lutein is not associated with an increased risk for developing cervical cancer (60297).
• Child development. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for child development. Details: Epidemiological research has found that a higher dietary intake of lutein in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy is associated with increased verbal intelligence and improved behavior in the child at 6-10 years of age. However, the ability to discriminate between a novel or familiar visual stimulus was reduced at about 6 months of age, and there were no effects on most cognitive outcomes in children aged 3-6 years (107106). Other epidemiological research has found that a higher dietary intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin in children aged 3-6 years may be associated with modestly improved executive function at 6-10 years. However, there were no effects on most cognitive outcomes in children aged 3-6 years or 6-10 years (109761).
• Choroideremia. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for improving vision. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking lutein 20 mg daily for 6 months does not improve vision in patients with choroideremia (60124).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for improving cognitive function. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that increased dietary lutein does not improve cognitive function measures, such as attention, executive function, or memory, when compared with placebo or an isocaloric meal (107082). However, the dietary source of lutein used in the included studies was heterogeneous and any conclusions remain unclear. Doses of lutein ranged from 8-12 mg daily, alone or in combination with daily zeaxanthin 2-26 mg and/or meso-zeaxanthin 10 mg and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 800 mg (107082). However, some preliminary clinical research in younger adults shows that taking lutein 10 mg and zeaxanthin 2 mg for one year modestly improves some measures of cognitive function, such as spatial memory, when compared with placebo (106348). Also, observational research has found that intake of choline and lutein plus zeaxanthin is positively associated with cognitive flexibility task performance speed. However, this association is not present with the intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin in the absence of choline (106354). Reasons for these discrepancies are not clear but may relate to lutein dose, treatment duration, or the addition of other nutrients to the diet or supplements.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for colorectal cancer prevention. Details: Some epidemiological research has found that higher dietary intake of lutein is associated with a reduced risk of developing colon cancer (3962). However, most epidemiological research has found that higher dietary intake of lutein is not associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer (34481,106372). It is not known if supplemental lutein has any effect on colorectal cancer risk.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for depression. Details: A cross-sectional study in 8655 adults with cardiometabolic disease including diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, heart failure, and stroke suggests that higher dietary lutein and zeaxanthin intake is associated with a 31% reduced risk of depression when compared with lower dietary intake. The study also found that adults with depression had lower dietary lutein and zeaxanthin intake than those without depression. Additionally, the study found a nonlinear U-shaped relationship between total dietary carotenoid intake and the risk of depression among patients with cardiometabolic disease, where the risk of depression decreased with increasing total dietary carotenoid intake up until an inflection point where the risk of depression increased with increasing total dietary carotenoid intake (112098). Further research is needed to establish causality.
• Diabetes. Observational research suggests that oral lutein may not be beneficial for the prevention of diabetes or diabetic complications. Details: Some epidemiological research has found that low serum levels of carotenoids, including lutein, are associated with impaired glucose tolerance. This may indicate that taking carotenoids such as lutein might reduce the risk of diabetes development (60161). However, population research has found that increasing intake of dietary lutein plus zeaxanthin does not decrease the risk of developing type 2 diabetes (14004,97227). Other epidemiological research in patients with type 2 diabetes has found that an increased serum concentration of lutein is not associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality over 14 years (109768).
• Diabetic retinopathy. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial in diabetic retinopathy. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking lutein 10 mg daily for 36 weeks has no effect on visual acuity or glare sensitivity in patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (97223). Observational research in a small group of patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy has also found that taking lutein 4 mg with zeaxanthin 0.5 mg daily for 4 months does not improve visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, or glare sensitivity when compared with zeaxanthin alone (100986).
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for esophageal cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that people who consume higher amounts of lutein and zeaxanthin in their diet have a 29% lower risk of developing esophageal squamous cell cancer when compared with those with lower intake (91159). It is unknown if supplemental lutein has any effect on esophageal cancer risk.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial in relieving muscle soreness due to exercise. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking a specific lutein-containing combination product (BioAstin, Cyanotech Corp.) containing haematococcus algae extract with astaxanthin 4 mg and lutein 480 mg daily for 3 weeks prior to exercise does not significantly reduce post-exercise muscle soreness when compared with placebo (19199). The effect of lutein alone is unclear.
• Fractures. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for fracture prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that increased dietary intake of lutein and/or zeaxanthin is not associated with a reduced risk of hip fractures (97228).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for gastric cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that increased dietary intake of lutein and/or zeaxanthin is not associated with a reduced risk of developing gastric cancer (97231).
• Glaucoma. Oral lutein has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with open-angle glaucoma shows that taking oral lutein 10 mg, zeaxanthin 2 mg, and meso-zeaxanthin 10 mg daily for 18 months increases macular pigment density, but does not affect visual function, when compared with placebo (109756).
• Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for hyperlipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that supplementation with lutein does not reduce the levels of total, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol when compared with placebo (109757). Most publications included in this analysis evaluated lutein alone in healthy adults or in patients with age-related macular degeneration, two studies combined lutein with another ingredient, and one study evaluated zeaxanthin alone. The effect of lutein in patients with existing hyperlipidemia is unclear.
• Infertility. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for infertility. Details: An observational study suggests that there is no association between dietary lutein intake and in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes including good oocyte quality, embryo transfer success rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and successful term pregnancy rates in subfertile couples who are candidates for IVF (112097).
• Lung cancer. Research is conflicting whether oral lutein is beneficial for lung cancer prevention. Details: Epidemiological research has found that low serum levels of carotenoids, including lutein, are associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (12874). However, other epidemiological research has found that higher serum levels or higher dietary intake of lutein are not associated with a reduced risk of developing or dying from lung cancer (39690,60090,60160). Another large epidemiological cancer screening trial with a mean follow-up of over 12 years suggests that dietary intake of lutein and zeaxanthin is protective against lung cancer as shown by a non-linear dose response curve, where lower doses of lutein and zeaxanthin are associated with a sharp decrease in the incidence of lung cancer, followed by a more gradual decrease in incidence at higher doses (112096).
• Macular telangiectasia type 2. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for macular telangiectasia type 2. Details: In patients with macular telangiectasia type 2, observational research has found that taking a specific combination of lutein 10 mg, meso-zeaxanthin 10 mg, and zeaxanthin 2 mg (MacuShield; Alliance Pharmaceuticals) for at least 6 months, with an average duration of 15.7 months, was associated with a stabilization of visual acuity. Also, the number and size of cavitations in the macula were reduced (106355).
• Metabolic syndrome. Oral lutein has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research shows that high dietary lutein intake or high lutein serum concentrations are associated with a 25% reduction in the incidence of metabolic syndrome when compared with low lutein intake or serum concentrations (97227). Additional population research in females shows that the highest dietary intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin is associated with 54% reduced odds of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with the lowest intake. However, when supplements containing lutein plus zeaxanthin were included in the total intake, there was no association with metabolic syndrome (109760).
• Myopia. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for myopia. Details: A very small clinical study in adults aged 20-50 years with high myopia shows that taking lutein 20 mg daily for 6 months does not improve macular pigment optical density, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, or electroretinogram measurements when compared with placebo (112099). The validity of these findings is limited by the very small sample size and short study duration.
• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for Non-Hodgkin lymphoma prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational population research has found that increased intake of lutein/zeaxanthin in the diet is associated with an 18% lower risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma when compared with low dietary intake. However, no dose-response relationship was reported (97229). It is unknown if supplemental lutein has any effect on non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for obesity. Details: A small clinical trial in obese middle-aged individuals shows that taking lutein 20 mg daily in addition to following a low-calorie diet for 10 weeks does not affect most anthropometric or cardiometabolic indices when compared with a low-calorie diet alone. However, there was a small beneficial effect on body fat and total cholesterol levels (107107).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for pancreatic cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that increased dietary intake of lutein and/or zeaxanthin is not associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer (97230). The effects of supplemental lutein are unclear.
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for Parkinson disease prevention. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of lutein is not associated with the risk of developing Parkinson disease (91164). The effects of supplemental lutein are unclear.
• Pre-eclampsia. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for pre-eclampsia prevention. Details: Some epidemiological research has found that high plasma concentrations of lutein are associated with a decreased risk of pre-eclampsia (60142). Other epidemiological research has found that the highest dietary intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin during pregnancy is associated with 68% reduced odds of having pre-eclampsia when compared with the lowest intake (109762). The effects of lutein supplements are unclear.
• Respiratory tract infections. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial in respiratory tract infection prevention or treatment. Details: Epidemiological research has found that high serum levels of lutein are not associated with a decreased incidence or severity of respiratory tract infections in the elderly (60152). The effects of supplemental lutein are unclear.
• Ulcerative colitis. It is unclear if oral lutein is beneficial for ulcerative colitis. Details: In patients in the remission phase of ulcerative colitis, observational research has found that a higher dietary intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin is associated with a reduced incidence of constipation, but not flatulence or feelings of urgency (tenesmus) (106362). The effects of supplemental lutein are unclear.
• Visual development. It is unclear if taking oral lutein during pregnancy can improve the visual acuity of the child. Details: Some observational research has found that higher maternal lutein levels are associated with a 22% to 40% lower risk of poor visual acuity in children at 3 years of age when compared with lower maternal lutein levels (102888). However, other epidemiological research has found that dietary intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin during the first or third trimesters of pregnancy is not associated with contrast vision or visual acuity in the child at 11-12 years of age (109759). The effects of lutein supplements are unclear. More evidence is needed to rate lutein for these uses.

(Read more about LUTEIN)

There is insufficient reliable information available about the effectiveness of ornamental marigold.

(Read more about ORNAMENTAL MARIGOLD)

EFFECTIVE

• Thiamine deficiency. Oral thiamine prevents and treats thiamine deficiency syndromes. Details: Thiamine deficiency is treated with oral thiamine 5-30 mg daily as a single dose or in divided daily doses for one month. For severe deficiency, thiamine up to 300 mg daily can be used (15).Thiamine deficiency can occur in people with malabsorption conditions such as alcohol use disorder, cirrhosis, and gastrointestinal diseases; in those with inadequate intake due to anorexia, nausea, and vomiting; and in those with increased requirements, including pregnancy, increased carbohydrate intake, increased physical activity, hyperthyroidism, infection, and liver disease. However, deficiency is rare with these conditions (15). The elderly might also be at increased risk for subclinical thiamine deficiency (11076).
• Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome (WKS). Parenteral thiamine is effective for treating symptoms of WKS. Details: Parenteral administration of thiamine 5-200 mg daily for 2 days decreases the risk of developing WKS and decreases symptoms of WKS in acute alcohol withdrawal. Between 30% and 80% of alcoholics are suspected to have thiamine deficiency (11075). An optimal dose for treating WKS has not been established; however, early research suggests that a 200 mg intramuscular dose may be more effective than lower doses (11075). In contrast, a moderate-sized clinical trial in adults with a history of heavy alcohol use who were asymptomatic or symptomatic for WKS shows that there is no benefit to administering high doses (300 mg 3 times daily) compared with medium (100 mg 3 times daily) or low (100 mg daily) doses of parenteral thiamine on cognitive or neurological functioning (111690). The study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Dysmenorrhea. Oral thiamine might reduce pain in some patients with dysmenorrhea. Details: A clinical study in adolescent Iranian females with dysmenorrhea shows that taking thiamine 100 mg alone or along with fish oil 500 mg daily for 2 months moderately reduces pain intensity and duration when compared with placebo (89341). Another preliminary clinical study in Indian females 12-21 years of age with moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhea shows that taking thiamine 100 mg daily for 90 days eliminates pain in 87% of participants when compared to baseline (77820). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a placebo group. Furthermore, available research was conducted in India and Iran, so it is unclear if these findings are generalizable to other geographic locations.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Intravenous thiamine does not seem to improve outcomes after CABG surgery. Details: A small clinical study in adults undergoing CABG surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass shows that giving intravenous thiamine 200 mg immediately prior to surgery and immediately after surgery does not improve clinical outcomes or lactate levels when compared with placebo (97010). Larger doses of thiamine also don't seem to be beneficial. Another small clinical study in patients receiving CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass shows that giving thiamine 600 mg intravenously on the day of surgery, and 400 mg daily for three postoperative days, does not improve postoperative outcomes when compared with placebo (103000).
• Heart failure. Most research suggests that oral or intravenous thiamine does not improve outcomes in patients with heart failure. Details: Observational research suggests that having heart failure is associated with 2.5-fold increased odds of having thiamine deficiency, possibly because of diuretic use, intestinal malabsorption, and metabolism changes. However, it is unclear if thiamine supplementation is beneficial. A meta-analysis of 2 small clinical trials in adults with systolic heart failure and unclear thiamine status shows that thiamine 200-300 mg given orally or by IV for 7-28 days improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by 3% when compared with control (97012). However, other meta-analyses and clinical studies in adults with heart failure with or without thiamine deficiency show that taking intravenous, intramuscular, or oral thiamine 100-500 mg daily does not improve LVEF fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, dyspnea, mortality, hospitalization, or exercise tolerance when compared with placebo or control (103002,111682,111686,111688).
• Mosquito repellent. Oral thiamine does not seem to repel mosquitos. Details: Clinical research in healthy volunteers shows that taking thiamine does not improve mosquito repellency when compared with taking vitamin C as a control (18016).
• Sepsis. Intravenous or oral thiamine, alone or in combination with vitamin C and hydrocortisone, does not seem to reduce mortality or prevent organ failure in sepsis or septic shock. Details: Multiple meta-analyses of small clinical studies in patients with septic shock show that intravenous or oral thiamine 100-500 mg 2-3 times daily for 3-7 days is no better than placebo for improving mortality, end-organ damage, number of ventilator-free days, and duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (105443,107717,107727,111689). One meta-analysis suggests that administration of thiamine alone increases the risk of mortality in these patients (111689). Subgroup analyses including only higher quality studies also fail to show a benefit of thiamine (107717). Another recent small clinical trial in patients with septic shock shows that receiving the same dose of intravenous thiamine does not increase vasopressor-free days when compared with placebo (105441). Intravenous thiamine 200 mg every 12 hours has also been evaluated in combination with intravenous vitamin C 1.5-2 grams and hydrocortisone 50-200 mg every 6-12 hours for 4-10 days (HAT therapy). While some retrospective research found HAT therapy to be beneficial (100315,102980,111689), high-quality, prospective clinical research has shown no benefit (105447,109956,111689). Meta-analyses in patients with sepsis and septic shock shows that receiving HAT therapy does not improve mortality, kidney injury, number of ventilator-free days, or ICU length of stay when compared with control (102129,104027,104028,104032,102998,105447,109956,111642,111689). Additionally, the meta-analyses suggest that HAT therapy does not reverse shock or improve sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores (109556,111642). However, one meta-analysis found that HAT therapy shortened the duration of vasopressor use when compared with placebo (111642). Long-term follow up from a study in patients with sepsis-induced respiratory and/or cardiovascular dysfunction shows that receiving HAT therapy does not improve cognitive, psychological, or functional status after 6 months and, for immediate memory scores and development of posttraumatic stress disorder, HAT therapy was less beneficial when compared with placebo (111299).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acute kidney injury (AKI). It is unclear if oral or intravenous thiamine is beneficial for treating or preventing AKI. Details: Observational research in adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with AKI has found that treatment with thiamine (dose unspecified) within the first 48 hours of admission is associated with 39% lower odds of in-hospital mortality and 28% higher odds of kidney function recovery when compared with patients that did not receive thiamine. Receiving thiamine was also associated with a 0.5-day reduction in ICU length of stay (107719).
• Anxiety. Although there is interest in using oral thiamine for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of thiamine for this purpose.
• Cardiac arrest. It is unclear if intravenous thiamine reduces the risk of death after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Details: A small clinical study in adults resuscitated from cardiac arrest shows that receiving intravenous thiamine 100 mg every 8 hours for 7 days does not reduce 28-day mortality when compare with a normal saline placebo (105442).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial for treating or preventing CVD. Details: Population research in Korea has found that insufficient dietary thiamine intake (daily intake of less than 1.22 mg in males or 1.03 mg in females) is associated with a 16% increased odds of developing angina or myocardial infarction when compared with sufficient dietary thiamine. However, the effects of thiamine supplementation on CVD have not been studied (107725).
• Cataracts. Small studies suggest that increased dietary thiamine might help prevent cataracts. Details: Observational research has found that a high dietary intake of thiamine 10 mg daily is associated with 40% lower odds of nuclear cataracts (6378). Other population research has found that higher dietary intake of thiamine is associated with a modestly reduced risk of age-related lens opacification (14301).
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral thiamine reduces the risk of developing cervical cancer. Details: Epidemiological research has found that increasing intake of thiamine from dietary and supplemental sources, along with folic acid, riboflavin, and vitamin B12, is associated with a lower odds of precancerous cervical lesions (11074).
• Child development. It is unclear if supplementing breastfeeding females with oral thiamine improves infant neurocognitive development. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that supplementing breastfeeding females with oral thiamine, 1.2-10 mg daily for 22 weeks, starting at 2 weeks postpartum, does not improve most cognitive or neurodevelopmental scores in the child when compared with placebo. However, one subgroup analysis suggests that thiamine supplementation may improve language scores (107726).
• Cognitive function. Oral thiamine has only been studied in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in healthy, middle-aged adults shows that taking a combination product containing thiamine hydrochloride 50 mg, other group B vitamins, bacopa, and ginkgo daily for 12 weeks does not improve measures of memory, attention, cognition, mood, or stress reactivity when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis shows a possible benefit of the combination supplementation on measures of attention in those with an optimal diet at baseline (111334). It is unclear if these findings are due to thiamine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if intravenous or oral thiamine improves clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Details: A small observational study of adults admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 has found that treatment with intravenous or oral thiamine 100 mg daily for an average of 7 days is associated with a 63% reduction in the odds of death within 30 days when compared with control. However, there was no associated reduction in duration of hospitalization or mechanical ventilation (107721). In addition, a small observational study of adults with encephalopathy that were mechanically ventilated secondary to COVID-19 has found that taking thiamine 500 mg three times daily orally for 5 days improves neurological manifestations, including ophthalmoparesis and ataxia, when compared with baseline. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group (107722).
• Critical illness (trauma). It is unclear if oral or intravenous thiamine is beneficial in patients with critical illness. Details: A meta-analysis of critically ill patients shows that treatment with oral or intravenous thiamine 100-600 mg daily for up to 7 days does not affect the need for mechanical ventilation, duration of hospital stay, or mortality when compared with control (107727).
• Delirium. It is unclear if oral or intravenous thiamine helps to prevent or treat delirium. Details: In critically ill patients, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that treatment with oral or intravenous thiamine 100-600 mg daily for up to 7 days reduces the odds of developing delirium by 42% when compared with control (107727). However, some observational research in adults with septic shock has found that receiving intravenous thiamine 400 mg daily with vitamin C 6 grams daily, both in divided doses, is not associated with reduced delirium when compared with control (103001). In non-critically ill, hospitalized adults with altered mental status, retrospective, observational research has also found that administration of oral or intravenous thiamine is not associated with improved cognitive function or reduced in-hospital mortality when compared with control (107723). Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant also shows that administering thiamine 200 mg three times a day intravenously for 7 days does not prevent delirium or shorten duration of delirium when compared with placebo (107718).
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial for the prevention of dementia. Details: Observational research in patients with alcohol use disorder has found that taking thiamine is associated with a 24% to 46% lower risk of developing dementia when compared with not taking thiamine (102999).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial in patients with depression. Details: Meta-analyses of population research in adults has found that high dietary consumption of thiamine is associated with a 10% to 31% lower risk of having depression when compared with low dietary consumption of thiamine. However, this research did not evaluate the effects of thiamine supplementation on depression (107133,107725). One small clinical study in adults with major depressive disorder shows that taking thiamine 300 mg daily in conjunction with fluoxetine 20 mg daily leads to greater improvements in depressive symptoms at 6 weeks when compared to fluoxetine with placebo. This benefit was no longer present at 12 weeks. This suggests that thiamine may accelerate improvement in symptoms during initiation of fluoxetine therapy (97013).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial for type 2 diabetes or gestational diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking thiamine 100-300 mg or its derivative benfotiamine 120-900 mg daily for 1-3 months does not reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose, or postprandial blood glucose when compared with placebo (111681). A large, prospective cohort study in adults without type 2 diabetes suggests that the risk of new-onset diabetes is minimized in adults consuming thiamine 0.75-1.10 mg daily from the diet, while lower and higher thiamine intake levels are associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes (111685). Thiamine has also been studied for preventing gestational diabetes. A large, prospective cohort study in pregnant adults suggests that higher supplementation with thiamine during the first and second trimesters is associated with a lower risk of gestational diabetes when compared with lower levels of total thiamine intake. However, this effect was not found for dietary intake of thiamine, only supplementation. Additionally, the participants were mostly Han Chinese adults, limiting the generalizability of the findings to other populations (111680).
• Diabetic nephropathy. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial for diabetic nephropathy. Details: A small clinical study in patients with early-stage diabetic nephropathy and microalbuminuria shows that taking thiamine 100 mg three times daily for 3 months decreases urinary albumin excretion, but does not affect glomerular filtration rate (GFR), when compared with placebo (16556).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Although there is interest in using oral thiamine for diabetic neuropathy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of thiamine for this condition.
• Dry eye. Oral thiamine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with dry eye suggests that adding unspecified doses of thiamine and mecobalamin to treatment with daily artificial tears and corticosteroid drops might slightly improve overall symptoms when compared with only artificial tears and corticosteroid drops for 1 month. There were no differences between groups at 2 months (105444). This finding is limited due to incomplete reporting and a lack of adjustment for multiple hypothesis testing.
• Dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial for treating or preventing dyslipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking thiamine 100-300 mg or its derivative benfotiamine 120-900 mg daily for 1-3 months does not improve low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglycerides when compared with placebo (111681). Observational research in Korea suggests that insufficient dietary thiamine intake (daily intake of less than 1.22 mg in males or 1.03 mg in females) is associated with 10% higher odds of developing dyslipidemia when compared with sufficient dietary thiamine intake. However, the effects of thiamine supplementation on dyslipidemia have not been studied (107725).
• Emergence delirium. It is unclear if intravenous thiamine helps to prevent emergence delirium in patients after surgery. Details: One clinical study in adults in the intensive care unit (ICU) after gastrointestinal surgery shows that receiving intravenous thiamine 200 mg daily for 3 days is associated with up to 84% lower odds of emergence delirium on the first two days, but not on the third day, when compared with a normal saline control (105440).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial in patients with fatigue. Details: A small clinical crossover study in patients with chronic fatigue and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) shows that taking thiamine 600-1800 mg daily for 20 days reduces fatigue scores when compared with placebo (105438). Taking oral thiamine 300 mg daily for an additional 12 weeks did not seem to affect fatigue scores when compared with placebo. However, an observational follow-up study found that those who self-continued thiamine for an additional 24 weeks after the study ended reported lower fatigue scores when compared with those who did not self-continue thiamine (107720).
• Glaucoma. Although there is interest in using oral thiamine for glaucoma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of thiamine for this condition.
• Herpes zoster (shingles). It is unclear if subcutaneous thiamine is beneficial in patients with shingles. Details: A small clinical trial shows that receiving subcutaneous thiamine 100 mg injections six times weekly for 4 weeks reduces itching by at least 30% in 67% of patients with herpes zoster. However, thiamine does not appear to significantly reduce pain in most patients (90396).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial in treating or preventing hypertension. Details: Population research in Korea has found that insufficient dietary thiamine intake (daily intake of less than 1.22 mg in males or 1.03 mg in females) is associated with a 5% increased odds of developing hypertension when compared with sufficient dietary thiamine. However, the effects of thiamine supplementation on hypertension have not been studied (107725).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial in patients with prediabetes. Details: A very small clinical trial in patients with prediabetes shows that taking thiamine 100 mg by mouth three times daily for 6 weeks modestly decreases 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose levels when compared to baseline and decreases fasting blood glucose levels when compared with placebo (91168).
• Kidney failure. Oral thiamine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary, low-quality, clinical research in adults with kidney failure undergoing regular hemodialysis shows that taking oral thiamine 90 mg daily with folic acid 30 mg daily for 96 weeks reduces overall mortality by 67% and improves cognitive scores by 31% when compared with no intervention (107724). It is unclear if this effect is due to thiamine, folic acid, or the combination.
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if dietary thiamine is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of migraine headache. Details: A large, retrospective, cross-sectional study suggests that higher dietary intake of thiamine is associated with lower odds of severe headache or migraine, especially in females (111684). The validity of these effects is limited by the subjective outcome measures and retrospective study design.
• Pneumonia. It is unclear if thiamine is beneficial for patients with pneumonia. Details: A large retrospective cohort study in adults hospitalized with pneumonia and active alcohol use disorder suggests that parenteral administration of thiamine is associated with reduced 14-day mortality and more frequent discharges home, but not a shorter length of stay or fewer ICU transfers, when compared with no thiamine use. Furthermore, parenteral thiamine doses above 200 mg do not appear to improve mortality but may be associated with longer length of stay and less frequent discharges home when compared with low oral doses of thiamine or parenteral thiamine at doses under 200 mg (111679). The validity of these effects is limited by the retrospective study design.
• Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). It is unclear if oral or parenteral thiamine is beneficial for patients with VAP. Details: A retrospective study in adults with VAP in the intensive care unit (ICU) suggests that supplementation with intravenous or oral thiamine may be associated with reduced ICU and in-hospital mortality (111683). The validity of these effects is limited by the retrospective study design. More evidence is needed to rate thiamine for these uses.

(Read more about THIAMINE)

EFFECTIVE

• Vitamin A deficiency. Oral vitamin A is effective for treatment and prevention of vitamin A deficiency. Details: Clinical and observational research in children shows that taking vitamin A orally is effective for preventing and improving symptoms of vitamin A deficiency, including xerophthalmia, night blindness, and Bitot's spots (82329,82689,82710,90773). Vitamin A deficiency can occur due to abnormal storage and transport of vitamin A in people with abetalipoproteinemia, protein deficiency, diabetes mellitus, hyperthyroidism, fever, liver disease, and cystic fibrosis (7135). However, research suggests that supplementation with vitamin A may not be necessary for most newborns with vitamin A deficiency. An observational study in newborns with vitamin A levels of 0.43-0.59 mcmol/L or >0.59 mcmol/L found that vitamin A levels increased naturally over the first six months of life, regardless of oral vitamin A supplementation. However, in infants with very low vitamin A levels (<0.43 mcmol/L), vitamin A supplementation was associated with significant increases in vitamin A levels at 6 months of age when compared with no supplementation, suggesting that only newborns with very low vitamin A levels should receive oral vitamin A (107298).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Aging skin. Topical vitamin A (retinol) formulations seem to improve symptoms of aging skin, such as wrinkles and mottled pigmentation. Details: The vitamin A analog tretinoin (Renova) is a prescription drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for adjunctive use in reducing fine wrinkles, hyperpigmentation, and tactile roughness of aging facial skin (103711). However, this drug is not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, which have not been as extensively evaluated in clinical research. Although research evaluating non-prescription topical vitamin A shows benefit for reducing wrinkles, most studies have been small and used different formulations. One small study in adults over 40 years of age shows that applying a pea size amount of 0.075% retinol cream to the face daily for 26 weeks seems to reduce deep and fine wrinkling when compared with placebo. Applying a lower dose of 0.04% retinol cream for 13 weeks seems to reduce fine wrinkling to a lesser degree, with no effect on deep wrinkles, when compared with placebo cream (104458). Another small clinical study in adults over 80 years of age shows that applying 2 mL of retinol 0.4% lotion to the upper arm up to 3 times weekly for 24 weeks reduces visible wrinkles when compared with placebo (94683). Two small studies in females ages 33 to 65 show that applying retinol 0.15%, 0.3% and 0.5% in liquid crystal formulation once daily to the face for 2-3 months improves skin pigmentation, elasticity, and wrinkles when compared with baseline (103680,104464). The validity of these two studies is limited by the lack of a comparator treatment. Topical vitamin A is frequently combined with other ingredients in commercial formulations; however these combinations have rarely been studied. A small clinical study in adults over 35 years with skin aging shows that applying a cream containing retinol 0.5%, niacinamide, resveratrol, and hexylresorcinol seems to improve wrinkling and skin tone when compared with baseline (104455). Another small preliminary clinical trial in adults ages 35-65 years with periorbital lines and wrinkles shows that applying a cream containing retinol modestly improves dryness, puffiness, redness, and darkness when compared with baseline. The retinol was conjugated with lactic acid, and the cream contained other nutrient and herbal ingredients It was applied around the eyes each evening, sometimes used in combination with another product each morning (109747).
• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Intramuscular vitamin A may reduce the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in very low birth weight infants when given at a dose of 5000 IU three times weekly for 28 days. Lower doses do not seem to be effective. It is unclear if enteral vitamin A is beneficial for BPD. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 clinical trials in premature infants shows that intramuscular administration of vitamin A every other day or three times weekly for 28 days reduces the risk of BPD by around 33% when compared with control (107297). The results from this meta-analysis are primarily driven by a modestly sized clinical trial in very low birth weight infants which shows that intramuscular administration of vitamin A 5000 IU three times weekly for 28 days reduces the risk of BPD by 15% when compared with a sham control (82195). A subgroup analysis of this trial suggests that infants with the lowest BPD risk estimate based on gestational age, birth weight, sex, ethnicity, and oxygen levels 24 hours after birth appear to benefit more from vitamin A therapy than those with higher BPD risk estimates (107296). Previous research in this area utilized a lower dose of only 2000 IU every other day for 28 days, and showed no significant improvement in the rate of BPD (82331,82613). The evaluation of a higher dose was prompted by research noting that the lower doses evaluated in these earlier studies were unable to achieve serum retinol concentrations above 25 mcg/dL, while doses at or above 5000 IU three times weekly could reach this level (82731). Enteral vitamin A has also been investigated. Meta-analyses of two clinical trials show that supplementation with vitamin A at an average of 5,000 IU daily, staring within four days of birth, does not reduce the incidence of BPD when compared with placebo (109750,109753).
• Diarrhea. Vitamin A seems to reduce the incidence of diarrhea in young children. However, it is unclear if oral vitamin A while breastfeeding is beneficial for preventing diarrhea in nursing infants. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in children up to age 5 shows that vitamin A supplementation reduces the incidence of diarrhea by 15% and mortality related to diarrhea by 12% when compared with control, usually placebo or no supplementation (109755). However, one small clinical trial in breastfeeding parents shows that supplementation of vitamin A 1800 IU and ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) 600 IU daily for 2 months does not reduce the risk of diarrhea in the nursing infants when compared with placebo (107293).
• Measles. High-dose oral vitamin A seems to reduce mortality from measles in children under 2 years of age and may also reduce the incidence of measles in children up to 5 years of age. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking vitamin A does not reduce mortality in children with measles when all ages and/or doses are considered (82373,82502,95055,109755). However, in children with measles who are less than 2 years of age, taking vitamin A 200,000 IU orally for at least two doses seems to reduce mortality by up to 83% when compared with placebo (82373,82502). Also, taking vitamin A seems to reduce the incidence of measles in children ages 6 months to 5 years (95055,109755).
• Night vision. Oral vitamin A as retinyl palmitate seems to reduce night blindness during pregnancy in malnourished patients. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin A (as retinyl palmitate) 23,000 IU weekly before and during pregnancy reduces pregnancy-related night blindness by 37% in malnourished patients (6154). Some evidence suggests that zinc supplements might potentiate the effects of vitamin A in restoring sight in zinc-deficient pregnant patients affected by night blindness (8630).
• Oral leukoplakia. High-dose oral vitamin A seems to reduce oral leukoplakia lesions in patients that chew tobacco and/or betel nut. Details: Clinical research in patients with tobacco and/or betel nut chewing habits shows that taking oral vitamin A 200,000-300,000 IU weekly for 6-12 months seems to result in remission of leukoplakia lesions in over 50% of participants when compared with placebo (34674,82617). However, it is unknown if vitamin A prevents the development of oral cancer from oral leukoplakia lesions.
• Overall mortality. In children at risk for vitamin A deficiency, oral vitamin A seems to reduce mortality. However, it does not seem to reduce mortality in healthy adults. Details: Despite previous debate on whether the programs supplying high-dose vitamin A in low- and middle-income countries with prevalent vitamin A deficiency are safe and effective for reducing child mortality, most experts, including World Health Organization, recommend high-dose vitamin A supplementation for those children (95055,95724,97170,109755). In 2010, a meta-analysis of 17 trials involving over 194,000 patients, showed that vitamin A supplementation reduces all-cause mortality by about 24% in children 6 months to 5 years of age (82559). However, some research published after this meta-analysis shows conflicting results (90773,90777). In fact, the largest clinical trial conducted to date (Deworming and Enhanced Vitamin A; DEVTA), which was published after the analysis and involved one million preschool children, suggests that high-dose vitamin A supplementation does not reduce mortality (90773). However, this trial was limited due to under-resourcing and undetermined patient consent and treatment compliance (90773). Furthermore, in 2017, a meta-analysis including the DEVTA trial along with 46 additional studies involving over 1.2 million preschool children, shows that vitamin A supplementation does reduce all-cause mortality by 12% when compared with control (95055). This meta-analysis was updated in 2022 with no additional studies or changes in conclusions (109755). Adult mortality is not reduced by vitamin A supplementation. In fact, some evidence even shows that vitamin A supplementation increases mortality when administered to healthy adult patients or those with a stabilized disease (15305,34622,90775).
• Postpartum complications. Oral vitamin A seems to reduce postpartum diarrhea and mortality in malnourished patients. Details: A large clinical study in malnourished pregnant patients in Nepal shows that taking vitamin A (as retinyl palmitate) 23,000 IU weekly before, during, and after pregnancy reduces the occurrence of blood and mucus in the stool by 93% and the occurrence of diarrhea by up to 90% during the first 6 months postpartum when compared with placebo (2581). Another clinical study in the same population shows that taking vitamin A (as retinyl palmitate) 23,000 IU weekly before and during pregnancy reduces pregnancy-related mortality by 40% when compared with placebo (6153).
• Retinitis pigmentosa. Oral vitamin A supplementation in children with retinitis pigmentosa seems to slow retinal function decline. Details: Observational and clinical research in children with retinitis pigmentosa shows that taking an age-adjusted dose of vitamin A, up to a maximum dose of 15,000 IU daily, modestly attenuates the decline in retinal function when compared with control (83,97167,103677).
• Ulcerative colitis. Oral vitamin A supplementation in patients with ulcerative colitis seems to improve clinical response and mucosal healing. Details: A clinical study in adults with symptomatic ulcerative colitis despite treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid shows that taking vitamin A 25,000 IU daily for 2 months reduces disease severity and increases the rate of clinical response and mucosal healing when compared with placebo. The number needed to treat (NNT) for clinical response is 3; the NNT for mucosal healing is 5 (100329).
• Wrinkled skin. Topical vitamin A (retinol) formulations seem to improve photodamage and wrinkles. Details: The vitamin A analog tretinoin (Renova) is a prescription drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for adjunctive use in reducing fine wrinkles, hyperpigmentation, and tactile roughness of facial skin (103711). This drug is not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, which have not been as extensively evaluated in clinical research. Still, some research in females ages 35-65 with moderately wrinkled and photoaged skin suggests that commercially available retinol formulations might reduce wrinkles and skin roughness similarly to tretinoin. One study used retinol serum starting at a concentration of 0.25% and increased to 1% over 3 months, compared with tretinoin cream 0.025% gradually increased to 0.1% (103671), while another study compared a gradual release tri-retinol 1.1% cream applied daily for 3 months to tretinoin 0.025% cream (104456). Commercial retinol also seems to be beneficial when compared with placebo. A small study in adults over 40 years old with photodamaged skin shows that applying stabilized retinol 0.1% to the face daily for one year improves wrinkles and mottled pigmentation in over 50% of the participants when compared with a placebo treatment (104463).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Atopic disease. Supplementation with oral vitamin A does not seem to reduce the risk of atopy. Details: Clinical research in infants born in Guinea-Bissau shows that a single dose of vitamin A does not reduce the incidence of atopy when compared with placebo (90779,90780). Furthermore, giving a single dose of vitamin A to some infants, such as low birth weight infants and infants given Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination, was associated with increased atopy and wheeze (90779).
• Fetal and premature infant mortality. Giving oral vitamin A to malnourished adults during pregnancy and postpartum does not seem to reduce fetal, early infant, or first year mortality. Giving oral or intramuscular vitamin A to the infant also does not seem to reduce mortality in most patients. Details: Most meta-analyses of clinical research in malnourished patients suggest that vitamin A supplementation during pregnancy or postpartum does not reduce fetal, early infant, or first year mortality (6152,34601,34602,34627,82479,82566,82567,90774,90776,90782,90784,95057,109750,109753). Also, giving vitamin A supplements or intramuscular vitamin A to low birth weight infants does not appear to reduce mortality in these patients (82195,82431,82498,90778,90781,95053,107296,107297). Furthermore, vitamin A supplementation in term infants from low or middle income countries also does not appear to reduce the risk of mortality at 6 or 12 months of age when compared with placebo (95054,103674). Some evidence from a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin A supplementation may reduce the risk of mortality at 6 months in Asian infants, although it appears to increase the risk of mortality at 6 months in studies conducted in Africa. It also appears to increase the risk of mortality in female term infants by 12 months (95054).
• Intestinal parasite infection. Oral high-dose vitamin A does not seem to prevent reinfection with intestinal parasites. Details: Clinical research in children living in Malaysia that were given albendazole 400 mg daily for 3-4 days for parasitic worms, shows that adding a single dose of vitamin A 200,000 IU does not help to prevent reinfection when compared with placebo (90772).
• Melanoma. Oral vitamin A in patients with resected melanoma does not seem to improve survival and disease recurrence. Details: A clinical study in patients with completely resected melanoma shows that taking vitamin A 100,000 IU daily for 18 months does not increase disease-free survival when compared with no supplementation (82670).
• Miscarriage. Oral vitamin A given to the mother does not prevent miscarriage or stillbirth. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that maternal supplementation with oral vitamin A, either alone or in combination with other vitamins, prior to or during early pregnancy does not reduce the risk of miscarriage or stillbirth when compared with control (104462).
• Sepsis. Most research shows that oral vitamin A does not reduce the risk of sepsis in premature infants. Details: A meta-analysis of three clinical trials in premature infants shows that providing supplemental enteral vitamin A 1500-5000 IU daily, starting within four days of birth, does not reduce the incidence of sepsis when compared with placebo (109753).
• Tuberculosis. Oral vitamin A does not seem to improve tuberculosis disease duration or mortality. Details: Low levels of vitamin A are common in patients with tuberculosis. However, taking vitamin A 2000 IU to 200,000 IU by mouth for 2-24 months does not improve symptoms, decrease disease duration, or reduce mortality when compared with placebo in these patients (82570,103668,109754). This may be due to the fact that vitamin A levels may normalize following the initiation of tuberculosis treatment, even without additional vitamin A supplementation.

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Head and neck cancer. Oral vitamin A taken for 2 years does not seem to improve survival or prevent head and neck cancer recurrence. Details: A large clinical study n patients with a history of head and neck cancer shows that taking vitamin A as retinyl palmitate 300,000 IU daily for 1 year, and followed by 150,000 IU daily for another year, does not reduce the risk of second primary tumors or tumor recurrence when compared with placebo. Also, vitamin A does not seem to improve survival or event-free survival (1710).
• HIV transmission. Oral vitamin A does not reduce vertical HIV transmission risk. There is some concern that vitamin A might increase HIV transmission through breast milk. Details: Observational and intervention research shows that taking vitamin A orally does not decrease the risk of HIV transmission to the fetus during pregnancy, to newborns during delivery, or to infants during early breast-feeding (6376,82470,95059). Preliminary clinical research also shows that vitamin A supplementation of pregnant adults with HIV infection might increase the risk of HIV transmission to their babies through breast milk (9801).
• Lower respiratory tract infections. Oral vitamin A does not reduce the risk for lower respiratory tract infections in children. It is unclear if supplementation of oral vitamin A while breast-feeding reduces the risk of lower respiratory tract infections in nursing infants. Details: Taking vitamin A by mouth does not prevent or reduce symptoms of lower respiratory tract infections, such as cough and fever, in children (82288,82443). Furthermore, some research shows that vitamin A is associated with a slight increase in the risk of respiratory tract infections when administered to children with adequate nutritional status (82288). Additionally, one small clinical trial in breast-feeding parents shows that supplementation of vitamin A 1800 IU and ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) 600 IU daily for 2 months does not reduce the risk of febrile illness or respiratory tract infections in the nursing infants when compared with placebo (107293).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Although prescription vitamin A analogs are approved to treat acne, it is unclear if non-prescription topical vitamin A products help with acne symptoms. Details: The high-dose vitamin A analogs adapalene (Differin) and tazarotene (Tazorac) are prescription drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of acne (103712,103713). These drugs are not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, such as retinol, which have not been extensively evaluated in clinical research. A small preliminary clinical trial in adolescents and young adults with mild to moderate acne shows that applying topical benzoyl peroxide 2.5% each morning and a topical retinol plus salicylic acid product each evening for 12 weeks modestly improves acne severity and other measures of complexion when compared with baseline. All patients also used the same cleanser twice daily (109748). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Alcohol-related liver disease. Oral vitamin A has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis shows that taking vitamin A in combination with coenzyme Q10 and other vitamins and minerals daily for 6 months does not improve survival when compared with placebo (61392).
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for preventing asthma in children. Details: An observational study in children has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin A is associated with a lower risk of asthma. Children in the highest quartile of vitamin A intake (median of 2267 IU daily) at 7 years of age had improved lung function and 32% lower odds of asthma at 11-14 years of age when compared with children in the lowest quartile of vitamin A intake (median of 870 IU daily) (107291).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if supplementation of oral vitamin A while breast-feeding is beneficial for preventing eczema in nursing infants. Details: One small clinical trial in breast-feeding parents shows that supplementation of vitamin A 1800 IU and ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) 600 IU daily for 2 months does not reduce the risk of eczema in the nursing infants when compared with placebo (107293).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for improving symptoms of autism. Details: Children with autism spectrum disorder are at increased risk for vitamin A deficiency, and vitamin A levels have been inversely associated with autism symptoms. Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of vitamin A 200,000 IU slightly improves emotional response, communication, and other symptoms when compared to baseline (97168). The lack of a control group limits the validity of these findings. Another preliminary clinical study in children with autism and vitamin A deficiency shows that taking vitamin A 50,000 IU weekly for 6 months, but not as a single dose of 200,000 IU, seems to improve social impairment scores when compared with control. Controls were children with autism without vitamin A deficiency that did not take a supplement (104459).
• Breast cancer. Although vitamin A intake has been associated with a reduced risk for breast cancer, it is unclear if vitamin A supplements are beneficial. Details: Epidemiological evidence has found an association between high intake of vitamin A and a reduced risk of breast cancer. A meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that the adults with the highest intake of vitamin A, either from diet alone or also from supplements, reduces the odds of developing breast cancer by 16% when compared with the lowest intake (1444,34610,109752). However, the effects of supplemental vitamin A, specifically, are unclear.
• Cataracts. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for cataract prevention. Details: A large-scale population-based study has found that high dietary intake of vitamin A is associated with a reduced risk of nuclear cataracts (6378). Also, other population research has found that the highest dietary intake of vitamin A is associated with a 17% lower risk of cataracts when compared with the lowest intakes (90786). However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the association between blood levels of vitamin A and the risk of cataracts (90786,90944). It is not known if supplemental vitamin A is beneficial.
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for cervical cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that increased vitamin A levels in the blood or higher vitamin A intakes are associated with a reduced risk of cervical cancer. However, this effect is observed when both forms of vitamin A, either retinol or carotenoids, are considered. When only the retinol form is considered, vitamin A supplementation does not seem to reduce the risk of cervical cancer (34613,109752). Also, a meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that vitamin A intake, either from diet alone or supplements, does not affect the risk of cervical cancer (109752).
• Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. It is unclear if oral vitamin A helps to prevent diarrhea caused by chemotherapy. Details: A very small clinical study in children receiving chemotherapy shows that taking vitamin A orally does not seem to prevent GI adverse effects, including diarrhea and mouth pain, when compared with control (9802).
• Child development. Oral vitamin A might improve growth and development in children with vitamin A deficiency, but not in those with good nutritional status. Details: Supplementing with vitamin A 60 mg for up to 9 years does not promote or improve child growth in children with appropriate nutritional status (20132). However, in children with vitamin A deficiency, supplementation with vitamin A may improve growth (82246).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There is limited evidence on the oral use of vitamin A in patients with emphysema. Details: Observational research has found that consuming recommended amounts of vitamin A in the diet is associated with 33% lower odds of developing emphysema (103678).
• Colorectal adenoma. Oral vitamin A has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination supplement containing selenium, zinc, vitamin A, vitamin C, and vitamin E orally daily for 5 years or until the recurrence of an adenoma reduces the risk of recurrent large-bowel adenomas by about 40% when compared with placebo in patients with large-bowel adenomas (92903). It is not clear if this benefit is due to vitamin A or other constituents.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for colorectal cancer prevention. Details: Taking vitamin A alone or in combination with beta-carotene does not seem to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer (12185).
• Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. It is unclear if oral vitamin A improves recovery after CABG surgery. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking vitamin A 5000 IU daily (as retinol palmitate) for 21 days starting on the day of CABG surgery reduces time in intensive care after surgery by 46% to 69% compared to a control group not given vitamin A (90783). Supplementation with vitamin A also improves total hospitalization time for those patients with adequate zinc status (90783).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19. Details: Clinical research in COVID-19 outpatients treated with hydroxychloroquine shows that taking vitamin A 25,000 IU daily for 10 days modestly reduces the number of patients with symptoms of fever, body ache, and fatigue when compared with placebo. However, there was no effect on the number of patients with cough, shortness of breath, lack of appetite, chest pain, diarrhea, loss of smell, or headache (109745).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for depression. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that dietary intake of vitamin A is inversely associated with depression. The highest intake of vitamin A was associated with a 17% reduced risk of depression when compared with the lowest intake. Also, vitamin A intake was lower in individuals with depression (109743). The effect of vitamin A supplementation is unclear.
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for esophageal cancer prevention. Details: Observational research has found that higher beta-carotene and vitamin A intake is associated with a reduced risk of esophageal cancer (34551,103675). However, evidence from higher-quality clinical research shows that taking vitamin A in combination with beta-carotene does not reduce the risk of esophageal cancer (12185).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for gastric cancer prevention. Details: Taking vitamin A alone and in combination with beta-carotene does not seem to reduce the risk of gastric cancer (12185).
• Glaucoma. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for glaucoma prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that a high dietary intake of vitamin A is associated with a 37% reduced risk of glaucoma when compared with a low intake (109742).
• HIV/AIDS. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for improving HIV/AIDs outcomes. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical trials and population research shows that maternal vitamin A supplementation of mothers with poor vitamin A status at baseline does not influence child or maternal mortality, hospitalization rate, or HIV/AIDS progression. However, pediatric vitamin A supplementation seems to decrease mortality rates in children with HIV/AIDS when compared with placebo (34529,95059).
• HIV/AIDS-related diarrhea. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for preventing diarrhea associated with HIV. Details: A large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin A can decrease the rate of diarrhea-specific mortality by up to 92% in vitamin A-deficient children with or without HIV/AIDS (1465). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin A does not significantly reduce diarrhea-specific mortality when only children with HIV/AIDS are considered (82511). But vitamin A does appear to reduce overall mortality in these children by 50% to 63% (1465,82511).
• Human papillomavirus (HPV). It is unclear if topical or oral vitamin A is beneficial for the resolution of genital warts caused by HPV. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical trials in patients with genital warts suggests that the oral prescription drugs isotretinoin and etretinate might promote resolution of warts when compared with baseline. However, the topical prescription drug tretinoin 0.05% cream does not seem to help (104460). These drugs are not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, such as retinol.
• Infant development. It is unclear if intramuscular vitamin A improves the development of low birth weight infants. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that giving intramuscular vitamin A to very low birth weight infants reduces the risk of chronic lung disease at 36 weeks postmenstrual age by about 13% compared to control (95053). Preliminary clinical research also shows that giving intramuscular vitamin A along with inhaled nitric oxide gas for 3 weeks to low birth weight infants on mechanical ventilation might improve mental development at one year in some of these patients when compared with inhaled nitric oxide gas alone (90778). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intramuscular vitamin A does not improve neurodevelopment in very low birth weight infants (95053).
• Iron deficiency anemia. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of anemia due to iron deficiency. Details: Some research in children and pregnant adults without anemia shows that taking vitamin A increases plasma levels of hemoglobin and ferritin, and may reduce the risk of developing anemia (9518,34627). However, another study in pregnant patients, half of whom had anemia at baseline and half of whom did not have anemia, shows that taking 3000 mcg retinol orally in combination with iron and folate does not improve hemoglobin or erythropoietin concentrations when compared with taking iron and folate (9188). In preterm infants with existing anemia, taking vitamin A 5000 IU and vitamin B complex 40 mg daily improves serum ferritin, hemoglobin, and reticulocyte levels and reduces the need for blood transfusions when compared with taking either vitamin alone. Taking vitamin A alone, however, does not improve these outcomes (100330).
• Leukemia. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for leukemia prevention. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with chronic myelogenous leukemia shows that taking a specific vitamin A product (Aquasol, Armour Pharmaceuticals) 50,000 IU orally daily in combination with busulfan therapy does not significantly increase progression-free survival or overall survival when compared with busulfan alone. Furthermore, supplementation with vitamin A plus busulfan seems to increase the percentage of patients who experience grade 2 toxicity by about 5-fold when compared with busulfan alone (82652).
• Liver cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for liver cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that vitamin A supplementation or serum levels of vitamin A are not associated with the risk of liver cancer (97169).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for lung cancer treatment or prevention. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of vitamin A is not associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer (35628). Furthermore, supplementation with vitamin A and beta-carotene seems to increase the risk of lung cancer in smokers or those exposed to asbestos (2642,34675). A large clinical trial in patients with existing lung cancer shows that vitamin A 300,000 IU daily for one year followed by 150,000 IU daily for a second year does not increase survival (1710). However, some clinical research shows that high-dose vitamin A 300,000 IU daily following curative lung cancer resection reduces the risk of new primary tumors in patients heavily exposed to tobacco (7875).
• Malaria. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for reducing symptoms of malaria in young children. Details: Taking vitamin A orally seems to help decrease symptoms of malaria in children less than 3 years of age living in endemic areas (1464). However, other clinical research shows that single doses of vitamin A 100,000 to 200,000 IU do not improve coma resolution, convulsions, fever, parasite clearance, or mortality in infants and children less than 5 years of age with cerebral malaria (90785).
• Multiple sclerosis-related fatigue. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for reducing fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis receiving interferon beta-1a shows that taking vitamin A 25,000 IU (as retinyl palmitate) (Zahravi Pharmaceutical) daily for 6 months followed by 10,000 IU daily for 6 months, improves physical, cognitive, and psychosocial fatigue when compared with placebo (95052).
• Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). A meta-analysis of several small clinical trials suggests that intramuscular vitamin A does not seem to prevent NEC. Details: A meta-analysis of 3 small clinical studies in very low birth weight infants shows that intramuscular administration of vitamin A 1500-5000 IU every other day or three times weekly for 28 days does not reduce the risk of NEC when compared with a control (107297).
• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for non-Hodgkin lymphoma prevention. Details: Population research has found that intake of vitamin A at levels above 2330 mcg daily is associated with a 17% lower risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma when compared with those whose daily intake of vitamin A is less than 642 mcg per day (90945).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for nonmelanoma skin cancer prevention. Details: Observational research over 26 years found that higher dietary vitamin A intake is associated with a 12% reduced risk for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in healthy patients when compared with lower vitamin A intake (101673).
• Oral clefts. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for oral cleft prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that periconceptional use of vitamin A, from diet and/or supplements, is associated with a 13% reduced incidence of cleft lip alone or with a cleft palate, but is not associated with the risk of cleft palate alone, in the child (109751).
• Osteoarthritis. Oral vitamin A has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with osteoarthritis shows that taking a specific product containing vitamin A in combination with selenium, vitamin C, and vitamin E (Selenium ACE, Carls-Berghs Farmaceutiska AB) does not appear to alleviate symptoms when compared with placebo (74449).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: Most observational research has found that increased dietary intake of vitamin A is associated with a reduced risk of developing ovarian cancer (9193,103679,109752). The most recent meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that adults with the highest intake of vitamin A, either from diet alone or supplements, reduces the odds of developing ovarian cancer by 19% when compared with the lowest intake (109752).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for pancreatic cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that higher intake of vitamin A is associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer; however, this benefit appears to be limited to only hospital-based cases and studies conducted in Europe (95060). In contrast, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin A in combination with beta-carotene does not reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer (12185).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin A prevents Parkinson disease development. Details: Population research has found that blood levels or dietary intake of vitamin A are not associated with the risk of Parkinson disease (91164).
• Photoreactive keratectomy. Oral vitamin A has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking a specific product (Evitex capsules, Alcon) containing vitamin A along with vitamin E seems to improve healing after photoreactive keratectomy. High dose (50,000 to 75,000 IU) vitamin A in the form of retinol palmitate taken daily with vitamin E (alpha-tocopheryl nicotinate) 460-590 mg daily seems to accelerate re-epithelialization, reduce haze formation, and improve visual acuity in patients undergoing laser surgery for myopia (348).
• Pneumonia. Oral vitamin A does not seem to prevent mortality related to pneumonia in children. However, it is unclear if vitamin A reduces symptom severity and hospitalization in children. Details: Clinical research in children living in developing countries shows that taking vitamin A orally does not prevent mortality related to pneumonia (1466,82362,82504,82717,109749). However, the evidence related to symptom duration and severity is mixed. A large study and early meta-analyses show that vitamin A does not prevent pneumonia or decrease the severity or length of hospitalization in children with pneumonia (1466,82362,82504,82717). A more recent meta-analysis also shows that giving vitamin A to children at or below 5 years of age does not affect the duration of hospitalization (109755). The best evidence to date comes from a recent meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. This meta-analysis shows that, when given in combination with conventional therapy to children up to 10 years of age, vitamin A reduces the duration of symptoms including fever, cough, lung rale, and shortness of breath, as well as the duration of hospitalization and time to a negative X-ray, when compared with conventional therapy alone (109749). However, the number of trials evaluating each endpoint is small and more research is needed to confirm these findings.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if vitamin A reduces the duration of hospitalization for premature infants. Details: A meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials in preterm infants shows that providing supplemental enteral vitamin A 1500-5000 IU daily, starting within four days of birth, does not reduce the duration of hospitalization when compared with placebo (109750).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Observational studies suggest that dietary intake of vitamin A is not associated with a reduced risk of prostate cancer (14134).
• Psoriasis. It is unclear if topical vitamin A is beneficial for psoriasis symptoms. Details: The vitamin A analog tazarotene (Tazorac) is a prescription drug that is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to treat stable plaque psoriasis covering up to 20% body surface area (103713). This drug is not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, such as retinol.
• Radiation proctopathy. It is unclear if oral vitamin A is beneficial for reducing chronic radiation proctopathy symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients experiencing chronic radiation proctopathy caused by pelvic radiotherapy shows that taking retinol palmitate 10,000 IU daily for 90 days might reduce rectal symptoms when compared with placebo (82350).
• Retinopathy of prematurity. Most small studies show that oral or intramuscular vitamin A does not reduce the risk of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Details: A meta-analysis of 4 small clinical studies in very low birth weight infants shows that intramuscular administration of vitamin A 2000-10,000 IU every other day or three times weekly, or oral vitamin A 2000 IU daily, for 28 days does not reduce the risk of ROP when compared with a control (107297). Another meta-analysis of clinical research shows that providing supplemental enteral vitamin A 1500 IU or an average of 5000 IU daily, starting within four days of birth, does not reduce the incidence of severe ROP (109750,109753). However, a very small clinical study in preterm infants, which was not included in the meta-analysis, shows that receiving retinol palmitate drops 3000 IU/kg daily for 28 days reduces the risk of ROP by 88% when compared with no treatment (103672).
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). It is unclear if adding oral vitamin A to antibiotic therapy is beneficial for symptoms of acute pyelonephritis in young females. Details: A small clinical study in females 2-12 years of age with a first occurrence of acute pyelonephritis shows that taking vitamin A 1500 units/kg daily for 10 days in conjunction with antibiotics decreases the duration of fever by about 1.3 days and reduces urinary frequency by about 1.5 episodes per day when compared to taking placebo with antibiotics. Taking vitamin A might also reduce the occurrence of moderate or severe renal scarring after 6 months when compared with placebo (100327). The validity of these findings is limited by small study size and a high dropout rate.
• Warts. It is unclear if topical or oral vitamin A improves the resolution of viral warts. Details: A meta-analysis of observational and clinical research in patients with viral warts suggests that receiving prescription oral retinoids (isotretinoin, acitretin, etretinate) seems to produce a 61% rate of wart resolution. Prescription topical retinoids seems to produce a 64% rate of wart resolution (104461). These drugs are not interchangeable with non-prescription, commercially available vitamin A products, such as retinol. More evidence is needed to rate vitamin A for these uses.

(Read more about VITAMIN A)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral zeaxanthin, when used in low levels as part of multi-ingredient products containing lutein, seems to improve some aspects of vision in patient with AMD. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin alone or in amounts similar to lutein is beneficial for slowing AMD progression. Details: Epidemiological research has found that people who consume higher amounts of zeaxanthin plus lutein in the diet have a reduced risk of developing late AMD, but not early or intermediate AMD (60238,106353,106359). However, any association between intake of zeaxanthin itself and the development of AMD is not clear. Some clinical research has assessed whether zeaxanthin alone can reduce symptoms and progression of AMD. A small clinical trial shows that taking supplemental zeaxanthin 8 mg daily for 12 months modestly improves some aspects of vision, such as macular pigment optical density, the ability to see details of near objects (near vision acuity), and resolution of scotoma (blind spot), when compared with placebo in patients with AMD (60245). Other clinical research in a healthy population shows that taking zeaxanthin alone (Optisharp) as 10 mg daily for 6-12 months increases macular pigment optical density (60175). Most clinical research in patients with AMD has assessed zeaxanthin in combination with lutein. In general, this combination has been shown to increase macular pigment optical density, as well as the ability to see under low-contrast conditions (contrast sensitivity) and visual acuity. However, most research has used much higher doses of lutein compared with zeaxanthin (60281,91160,97225,106366,108615). Use of near equal amounts, such as zeaxanthin 8-10 mg daily plus lutein 9-10 mg daily for up to 2 years, seems to improve macular density in adults with or without AMD (60175,60268,60270,106358); however, effects on vision when used for up to 2 years in patients with AMD are conflicting (60245,60268,60270,106358). Zeaxanthin has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients, with conflicting findings. A specific supplement (AZYR SIFI) containing zeaxanthin 1 mg, lutein 10 mg, vitamin C 180 mg, vitamin E 30 mg, zinc 22.5 mg, copper 1 mg, and astaxanthin 4 mg has been used daily for 1-2 years with moderate evidence of benefit (19196,60244). Taking zeaxanthin 2 mg plus lutein 10 mg in addition to the original Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) formulation (vitamins C and E, beta-carotene, and zinc) does not seem to prevent the progression to advanced AMD more than the AREDS formulation alone. However, this progression was modestly inhibited in individuals with low dietary intakes of lutein and zeaxanthin. While progression to late AMD was only modestly inhibited at 5 years when these doses of lutein and zeaxanthin were included in a revised formulation devoid of beta-carotene (60281), results of an additional 5 years of follow up showed that this revised formulation reduces the risk of progression to late AMD by 15% when compared with the formulation containing beta-carotene (108615). Clinical research shows that adding meso-zeaxanthin 10 mg to this revised AREDS formulation (AREDS2) does not further improve contrast sensitivity in patients with non-advanced AMD (106369). In first-generation offspring of parents with neovascular AMD, taking zeaxanthin 2 mg, lutein 10 mg, vitamin C 180 mg, vitamin E 30 mg, zinc 15 mg, and copper 1 mg daily for 6 months does not improve the macular pigment optical density (106347). Reasons for these discrepancies are not clear but may relate to the patient population, zeaxanthin dose, treatment duration, or other ingredients included in combination products.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for attenuating cognitive decline in older adults. Details: Clinical research in adults 40-75 years old shows that taking zeaxanthin 2 mg with lutein 10 mg daily for 6 months improves some, but not all, measures of visual memory when compared with placebo. However, other measures of memory and cognitive function were not improved (109763). Also, preliminary clinical research in older adults shows that taking the same dose of zeaxanthin and lutein for one year modestly improves some measures of cognitive function, such as complex attention and cognitive flexibility, when compared with placebo (106367). Some observational research in patients 50 years and older has found that higher dietary lutein and zeaxanthin intake is associated with greater word recall when compared with lower intake (102891). However, clinical research in patients over 60 years old shows that taking zeaxanthin 2 mg with lutein 10 mg daily for 5 years in addition to vitamins C and E, beta-carotene, and zinc (AREDS) does not improve markers of cognitive function, such as memory and verbal fluency, when compared with AREDS alone (94702).
• Alzheimer disease. Oral zeaxanthin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease shows that taking zeaxanthin 2 mg, lutein 10 mg, meso-zeaxanthin 10 mg, fish oil 1 gram (providing docosahexaenoic acid 500 mg and eicosapentaenoic acid 150 mg), and vitamin E 15 mg (Memory Health) daily for 12 months does not affect disease severity when compared with placebo. However, there were modest increases in the number of patients experiencing either an improvement or attenuated decline in memory and mood (109764). The effect of zeaxanthin alone is unclear.
• Asthenopia (eye strain). Oral zeaxanthin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Results from one clinical trial show that taking a combination product (Cerebos Pacific Limited) containing zeaxanthin 1 mg, lutein 5 mg, and black currant extract 200 mg daily for 2 weeks modestly improves visual fatigue and eye stress when compared with placebo in patients completing a two-hour visual proof reading task (60214). The effect of zeaxanthin alone on eye strain is unclear.
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for asthma prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher dietary intake of zeaxanthin plus lutein is associated with up to 30% lower odds of having asthma when compared with a lower dietary intake (109765). The effects of zeaxanthin intake alone or zeaxanthin supplementation are unclear.
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Epidemiological research has found that higher serum levels of lutein plus zeaxanthin are associated with a reduced risk of developing breast cancer (10132). The effects of supplemental zeaxanthin are unclear.
• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Oral zeaxanthin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that giving preterm and low birth weight infants a specific product (LUTEINofta, SOOFT Italia SpA) containing zeaxanthin 0.0006 mg and lutein 0.14 mg orally once daily, starting at birth and continuing until 36 weeks' corrected gestational age, does not decrease the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia when compared with placebo (91163). The effect of zeaxanthin alone is unclear.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral zeaxanthin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in adults 50-85 years old shows that taking lutein 10 mg plus zeaxanthin 2 mg daily for an average of 4.8 years does not decrease the risk of CVD-related mortality or cardiovascular events such as stroke, myocardial infarction, or angina when compared with no supplementation (94701). Individual cardiovascular outcomes were not separately evaluated in this study. The effect of zeaxanthin alone on CVD prevention is unknown.
• Cataracts. Increased levels of zeaxanthin in the blood seems to reduce the odds of developing cataracts. It is unclear if dietary or supplemental zeaxanthin is beneficial for cataract treatment or prevention. Details: Some population research has found that higher blood levels of zeaxanthin are associated with a 30% lower odds of developing age-related cataracts, and more specifically, a 37% decreased risk of developing nuclear cataracts (90944,91161). Population research has also found that higher dietary combined intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin is associated with lower odds of developing cataracts. However, any association between intake of zeaxanthin itself and the development of cataracts is unclear (91162). Clinical research shows that taking zeaxanthin 2 mg and lutein 10 mg daily orally, in addition to the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) formulation containing vitamin C 500 mg, vitamin E 400 IU, beta-carotene 15 mg, zinc 80 mg, and copper 2 mg, for an average of 4.7 years decreases the risk of needing cataract surgery by 32% when compared with the AREDS formulation alone in patients with low dietary intake of lutein and zeaxanthin, but not in those with higher dietary intake of lutein and zeaxanthin (94703).
• Child development. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for child development. Details: Epidemiological research has found that a higher dietary intake of zeaxanthin in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy is associated with increased verbal intelligence and improved behavior in the child at 6-10 years of age. However, the ability to discriminate between a novel or familiar visual stimulus was reduced at about 6 months of age, and there were no effects on most cognitive outcomes in children aged 3-6 years (107106). Other epidemiological research has found that a higher dietary intake of zeaxanthin plus lutein in children aged 3-6 years may be associated with modestly improved executive function at 6-11 years. However, there were no effects on most cognitive outcomes in children aged 3-6 years or 6-11 years (109761).
• Cognitive function. Oral zeaxanthin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in younger adults shows that taking zeaxanthin 2 mg and lutein 10 mg for one year modestly improves some measures of cognitive function, such as spatial memory, when compared with placebo (106348). Observational research has found that intake of choline and lutein plus zeaxanthin is positively associated with cognitive flexibility task performance speed. However, this association is not present with the intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin in the absence of choline (106354). The effect of zeaxanthin alone is unclear.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for colorectal cancer prevention. Details: Although some individual epidemiological research disagrees (3962), most research has found that dietary intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin is not associated with a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (34481,106372). However, any association with intake of zeaxanthin alone, as supplements or in the diet, is unclear.
• Diabetes. Observational research suggests that oral zeaxanthin may not be beneficial for the prevention of diabetes or diabetic complications. Details: Some epidemiological research has found that low serum levels of carotenoids, including zeaxanthin and lutein, are associated with impaired glucose tolerance (60161). Other population research has found that increased dietary intake of zeaxanthin plus lutein does not decrease the risk of developing type 2 diabetes (14004,97227). Other epidemiological research in patients with type 2 diabetes has found that an increased serum concentration of zeaxanthin is not associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality over 14 years (109768).
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for esophageal cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that people who consume higher combined amounts of zeaxanthin and lutein in the diet have a 29% lower risk of developing esophageal squamous cell cancer when compared with lower intake (91159). The effects of supplemental zeaxanthin are unclear.
• Fractures. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for fracture prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that increased dietary intake of zeaxanthin and/or lutein is not associated with a reduced risk of hip fractures (97228). The effects of supplemental zeaxanthin are unclear.
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for gastric cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that increased dietary intake of lutein and/or zeaxanthin is not associated with a reduced risk of developing gastric cancer (97231). The effects of supplemental zeaxanthin are unclear.
• Glaucoma. Oral zeaxanthin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with open-angle glaucoma shows that taking oral zeaxanthin 2 mg, lutein 10 mg, and meso-zeaxanthin 10 mg daily for 18 months increases macular pigment density, but does not affect visual function, when compared with placebo (109756).
• Hyperlipidemia. Although there has been interest in using oral zeaxanthin for hyperlipidemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of zeaxanthin for this condition.
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for lung cancer prevention. Details: Epidemiological research has found that low serum levels of carotenoids, including zeaxanthin, are associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (12874). However, other epidemiological research has found that higher serum levels of zeaxanthin are not associated with a reduced risk of dying from lung cancer (39690,60160).
• Macular telangiectasia type 2. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for macular telangiectasia type 2. Details: In patients with macular telangiectasia type 2, observational research has found that taking a specific combination of lutein 10 mg, meso-zeaxanthin 10 mg, and zeaxanthin 2 mg (MacuShield; Alliance Pharmaceuticals) for at least 6 months, with an average duration of 15.7 months, was associated with a stabilization of visual acuity. Also, the number and size of cavitations in the macula were reduced (106355).
• Metabolic syndrome. Oral zeaxanthin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Population research in females shows that the highest dietary intake of zeaxanthin plus lutein is associated with 54% reduced odds of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with the lowest intake. However, when supplements containing zeaxanthin plus lutein were included in the total intake, there was no association with metabolic syndrome (109760).
• Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Oral zeaxanthin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that giving preterm and low birth weight infants a specific product (LUTEINofta, SOOFT Italia SpA) containing zeaxanthin 0.0006 mg and lutein 0.14 mg orally once daily, starting at birth and continuing until 36 weeks' corrected gestational age, does not decrease the incidence of NEC when compared with placebo (91163).
• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for non-Hodgkin lymphoma prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that increased intake of zeaxanthin/lutein in the diet is associated with an 18% lower risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma when compared with low dietary intake. However, no dose-response relationship was reported (97229). It is unknown if supplemental zeaxanthin has any effect on non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk.
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for pancreatic cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that increased dietary intake of zeaxanthin and/or lutein is not associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer (97230). The effects of supplemental zeaxanthin are unclear.
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for Parkinson disease prevention. Details: Population research has found that people who consume higher amounts of zeaxanthin in the diet do not have a lower risk of developing Parkinson disease (91164). The effects of supplemental zeaxanthin are unclear.
• Pre-eclampsia. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for the prevention of pre-eclampsia. Details: Some epidemiological research has found that the highest intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin during pregnancy is associated with 68% reduced odds of having pre-eclampsia when compared with the lowest intake (109762). The effects of zeaxanthin supplements are unclear.
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Epidemiological research has found that low serum levels of carotenoids, including zeaxanthin, are not associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer (12874). The effects of supplemental zeaxanthin are unclear.
• Respiratory tract infections. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of respiratory tract infections. Details: Epidemiological research has found that high serum levels of zeaxanthin are not associated with decreased incidence or severity of respiratory tract infections in the elderly (60152). The effects of supplemental zeaxanthin are unclear.
• Retinopathy of prematurity. Oral zeaxanthin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in preterm and low birth weight infants shows that giving a specific product (LUTEINofta, SOOFT Italia SpA) providing lutein 0.14 mg or 0.5 mg/kg plus zeaxanthin 0.0006 mg or 0.02 mg/kg orally once daily, starting at birth and continuing until 36-40 weeks' corrected gestational age, does not decrease the incidence or severity of retinopathy of prematurity when compared with placebo (60240,60243,91163,102889).
• Ulcerative colitis. It is unclear if oral zeaxanthin is beneficial for ulcerative colitis. Details: In patients in the remission phase of ulcerative colitis, observational research has found that a higher dietary intake of lutein plus zeaxanthin is associated with a reduced incidence of constipation, but not flatulence or feelings of urgency (tenesmus) (106362). The effects of supplemental zeaxanthin are unclear.
• Visual development. It is unclear if taking oral zeaxanthin during pregnancy can improve the visual acuity of the child. Details: Some observational research has found that the highest maternal plasma zeaxanthin levels at delivery are associated with a 38% lower risk of poor visual acuity in children at 3 years of age when compared with the lowest maternal zeaxanthin levels (102888). However, other epidemiological research has found that dietary intake of zeaxanthin plus lutein during the first or third trimesters of pregnancy is not associated with contrast vision or visual acuity in the child at 11-12 years of age (109759). The effects of zeaxanthin supplements are unclear. More evidence is needed to rate zeaxanthin for these uses.

(Read more about ZEAXANTHIN)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in amounts commonly found in foods. Bilberry has Generally Recognized As Safe status (GRAS) for use in foods in the US (4912).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately for medicinal purposes. Bilberry fruit extracts have been used with apparent safety in clinical trials at a dose of up to 160 mg daily for up to 6 months (39,40,8139,9739,14280,35472,35510,35512,103190,104192,104195). A higher bilberry extract dose of 1.4 grams daily has been used with apparent safety for up to 4 weeks (104194). Whole bilberries or bilberry juice have also been consumed with apparent safety in quantities of 100-160 grams daily for up to 35 days (35463,91506).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when the leaves are used orally in high doses or for a prolonged period. Death can occur with chronic use of 1.5 gram/kg daily (2).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in the amounts commonly found in foods. However, there is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of bilberry when used in medicinal amounts during pregnancy and lactation; avoid using.

(Read more about BILBERRY)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Consuming up to 20 mg of lutein daily from both dietary and supplemental sources appears to be safe (3219,3220,60167). Lutein supplements have been safely used in clinical trials at doses of up to 20 mg daily for up to 10 years (11798,60133,60177,94703,94701,100986,104570,107107,108615,109763).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. A specific product containing lutein (LUTEINofta, SOOFT Italia SpA) has been used with apparent safety in infants at a dose of 0.14 mg daily for 36 weeks (91163).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in amounts found in foods. The high end of dietary lutein intake ranges from 6.9-11.7 mg/day (3219,3220).

(Read more about LUTEIN)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Tagetes has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of tagetes used in amounts greater than those found in foods.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid amounts greater than those commonly found in foods.

(Read more about ORNAMENTAL MARIGOLD)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for thiamine, and doses up to 50 mg daily have been used without adverse effects (15,6243). ...when used intravenously or intramuscularly and appropriately. Injectable thiamine is an FDA-approved prescription product (15,105445).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in dietary amounts. A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for healthy individuals (6243).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in dietary amounts of 1. 4 mg daily. A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for healthy individuals (3094,6243).

(Read more about THIAMINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intramuscularly and appropriately. Vitamin A, as pre-formed vitamin A (retinol or retinyl ester), is safe in adults when taken in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 10,000 IU (3000 mcg) per day (7135). Higher doses increase the risk of side effects. There is also growing concern that taking high doses of antioxidants such as vitamin A might do more harm than good. In an analysis of studies, taking vitamin A supplements alone or in combination with other antioxidants is associated with an increased risk of mortality from all causes (15305,90775). Keep in mind that vitamin A is available in two different forms: pre-formed vitamin A (retinol or retinyl ester) and provitamin A (carotenoids). The safety concerns associated with high vitamin A intake occur with pre-formed vitamin A only. Some supplements contain vitamin A in both pre-formed and provitamin A forms. For these supplements, the amount of pre-formed vitamin A should be used to determine if the amount of vitamin A is safe.

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used topically and appropriately, short-term. Retinol 0.5% has been used on the skin daily for up to 12 weeks with apparent safety. No serious adverse effects have been reported in clinical trials (103671,103680).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in high doses. Doses higher than the UL of 10,000 IU (3000 mcg) per day of pre-formed vitamin A (retinol or retinyl ester) might increase the risk of side effects (7135). While vitamin A 25,000 IU (as retinyl palmitate) daily for 6 months followed by 10,000 IU daily for 6 months has been used with apparent safety in one clinical trial (95052), prolonged use of excessive doses of vitamin A can cause significant side effects such as hypervitaminosis A. The risk for developing hypervitaminosis A is related to total cumulative dose of vitamin A rather than a specific daily dose (1467,1469). There is also concern that taking high doses of antioxidants such as vitamin A might do more harm than good. In an analysis of studies, taking vitamin A supplements alone or in combination with other antioxidants is associated with an increased risk of mortality from all causes (15305,90775). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of using sublingual formulations of vitamin A.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally or intramuscularly and appropriately. The amount of pre-formed vitamin A (retinol or retinyl ester) that is safe depends on age. For children up to 3 years of age, doses less than 2000 IU (600 mcg) per day seem to be safe. For children ages 4 to 8, doses less than 3000 IU (900 mcg) per day seem to be safe. For children ages 9 to 13, doses less than 5667 IU (1700 mcg) per day seem to be safe. For children 14 to 18, doses less than 9333 IU (2800 mcg) per day seem to be safe (7135). Keep in mind that vitamin A is available in two different forms: pre-formed vitamin A (retinol or retinyl ester) and provitamin A (carotenoids). The safety concerns associated with high vitamin A intake occur with pre-formed vitamin A only. Some supplements contain vitamin A in both pre-formed and provitamin A forms. For these supplements, the amount of pre-formed vitamin A should be used to determine if the amount of vitamin A is safe.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when pre-formed vitamin A (retinol or retinyl ester) is used orally in excessive doses. For children up to 3 years of age, avoid doses greater than 2000 IU (600 mcg) per day. For children ages 4 to 8, avoid doses greater than 3000 IU (900 mcg) per day. For children ages 9 to 13, avoid doses greater than 5667 IU (1700 mcg) per day. For children ages 14 to 18, avoid doses greater than 9333 IU (2800 mcg) per day (7135). Higher doses of vitamin A supplementation have been associated with increased risk of side effects such as pneumonia, bone pain, and diarrhea (319,95051). Long-term supplementation with low to moderate doses on a regular basis can cause severe, but usually reversible, liver damage (11978).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally or intramuscularly and appropriately. Vitamin A, as pre-formed vitamin A (retinol or retinyl ester), is safe during pregnancy and lactation when used in doses less than 10,000 IU (3000 mcg) per day (7135,16823,107293). Keep in mind that vitamin A is available in two different forms: pre-formed vitamin A (retinol or retinyl ester) and provitamin A (carotenoids). The safety concerns associated with high vitamin A intake occur with pre-formed vitamin A only. Some supplements contain vitamin A in both pre-formed and provitamin A forms. For these supplements, the amount of pre-formed vitamin A should be used to determine if the amount of vitamin A is safe.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally or intramuscularly in excessive doses. Daily intake of greater than 10,000 IU (3000 mcg) can cause fetal malformations (3066,7135). Excessive dietary intake of vitamin A has also been associated with teratogenicity (11978). The first trimester of pregnancy seems to be the critical period for susceptibility to vitamin A-associated birth defects such as craniofacial abnormalities and abnormalities of the central nervous system (7135). Pregnant patients should monitor their intake of pre-formed vitamin A (retinol or retinyl ester). This form of vitamin A is found in several foods including animal products, some fortified breakfast cereals, and dietary supplements (3066).

(Read more about VITAMIN A)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in doses of up to 2 mg daily. Zeaxanthin supplements have been safely used in clinical trials at doses of up to 2 mg daily for up to 10 years (94701,94702,94703,108615).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in amounts greater than 2 mg daily. Zeaxanthin supplements in doses of 8-10 mg daily for up to 12 months have been used with apparent safety in clinical trials (60175,60245).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. A specific product containing zeaxanthin (LUTEINofta, SOOFT Italia SpA) has been used with apparent safety in infants at a dose of 0.0006 mg daily for 36 weeks (91163). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of zeaxanthin at higher doses or in older children.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in amounts found in foods. Zeaxanthin is found in breast milk and levels correlate with infant status (106365). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of supplemental zeaxanthin.

(Read more about ZEAXANTHIN)

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, bilberry fruit extract might increase the risk of bleeding when taken with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.  Details In vitro, animal, and clinical research suggest that anthocyanidin extracts from bilberry can inhibit platelet aggregation (16631,35455,35503,35504,35505).

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, bilberry leaf or fruit extract may increase the risk of hypoglycemia when taken with antidiabetes drugs.  Details Animal research suggests that bilberry leaf extract might have blood glucose-lowering activity (1264). Also, one small clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking bilberry fruit extract 470 mg as a single dose prior to an oral glucose tolerance test lowers plasma glucose levels when compared with placebo (91507).

CYTOCHROME P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, bilberry fruit extract might decrease levels of drugs metabolized by CYP2E1.  Details Animal research shows that exposure to small concentrations of bilberry extract in drinking water for around one month increased CYP2E1 activity by 31%. However, exposure over a 2-month period did not increase CYP2E1 activity (103191). This effect has not been reported in humans.

ERLOTINIB (Tarceva) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, bilberry fruit extract might reduce the efficacy of erlotinib.  Details In vitro research suggests that bilberry fruit extract and its constituents, delphinidin and delphinidin-3-O-glucoside, inhibit the activity of erlotinib (97031). This interaction has not been reported in humans.

(Read more about BILBERRY)

(Read more about LUTEIN)

(Read more about ORNAMENTAL MARIGOLD)

TRIMETHOPRIM (Proloprim) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Insignificant •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Trimethoprim might increase blood levels of thiamine.  Details In vitro, animal, and clinical research suggest that trimethoprim inhibits intestinal thiamine transporter ThTR-2, hepatic transporter OCT1, and renal transporters OCT2, MATE1, and MATE2, resulting in paradoxically increased thiamine plasma concentrations (111678).

(Read more about THIAMINE)

HEPATOTOXIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, taking high doses of vitamin A in combination with other potentially hepatotoxic drugs might increase the risk of liver disease.  Details The tolerable upper intake level (UL) is the highest level of intake that is likely to pose no risk of adverse effects. Doses of vitamin A above the UL can cause hepatotoxicity, ranging from elevated liver enzymes to liver failure (7135,82554).

RETINOIDS Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of retinoids with vitamin A supplements might produce supratherapeutic vitamin A levels.  Details Retinoids, which are vitamin A derivatives, could have additive toxic effects when taken with vitamin A supplements (3046).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking tetracycline antibiotics with high doses of vitamin A can increase the risk of pseudotumor cerebri.  Details Benign intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri) can occur with tetracyclines and with acute or chronic vitamin A toxicity. Case reports suggest that taking tetracyclines and vitamin A concurrently can increase the risk of this condition (10545,10546,10547). Avoid high doses of vitamin A in people taking tetracyclines chronically.

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, high doses of vitamin A could increase the risk of bleeding with warfarin.  Details Vitamin A toxicity is associated with hemorrhage and hypoprothrombinemia, possibly due to vitamin K antagonism (505). Advise patients taking warfarin to avoid doses of vitamin A above the tolerable upper intake level of 10,000 IU/day for adults.

(Read more about VITAMIN A)

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking zeaxanthin with antidiabetes drugs might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.  Details In an animal diabetic model, zeaxanthin has hypoglycemic effects (106363). However, population research has found that increasing intake of dietary zeaxanthin plus lutein does not decrease the risk of developing type 2 diabetes (14004,97227).

(Read more about ZEAXANTHIN)

General ...Orally, bilberry fruit, juice, and extracts seem to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Dark-colored stools, flatulence, and gastrointestinal discomfort.

Gastrointestinal ...In one small clinical trial, mild-to-moderate flatulence was reported in 33% of patients taking sieved bilberries and concentrated bilberry juice (91506). However, the patients in this study had ulcerative colitis, and the study lacked a control group, limiting the validity of this finding. In another small clinical study of males with age-related cognitive impairment, temporary adverse gastrointestinal (GI) effects were reported in 13% of patients drinking a combination of bilberry and grape juice. However, the adverse GI effect rate was identical in patients drinking a placebo juice (110641). A post-marketing surveillance report of 2295 patients using bilberry extract (Tegens) found that 1% of patients complained of GI discomfort and less than 1% experienced nausea or heartburn (35500).
Theoretically, fresh bilberry fruit may have laxative effects. One clinical trial noted an increased frequency of bowel movements following the administration of a combination formulation containing aerial agrimony parts, cinnamon quills, powdered bilberry fruit, and slippery elm bark (35462). It is unclear if these effects were due to bilberry, other ingredients, or the combination.

Other ...Orally, bilberry may cause discoloration of feces and the tongue. In one study, a dark-bluish to black discoloration of both the feces and the tongue was observed following consumption of sieved bilberries and concentrated bilberry juice. In one patient, a slight discoloration of the teeth has also been observed (91506). In another study, 50% of patients reported dark green stools after taking bilberry extract 700 mg twice daily for 4 weeks (104194).

(Read more about BILBERRY)

General ...Orally, dietary and supplemental lutein is generally well tolerated. Doses up to 20 mg daily have not resulted in adverse effects.

(Read more about LUTEIN)

General ...Orally, ornamental marigold is well tolerated in amounts found in foods. No adverse effects have been reported when used in amounts greater than those found in foods. A thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted. Topically, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Topically: Contact dermatitis.

Dermatologic ...Topically, ornamental marigold has been reported to cause contact dermatitis (11).

Immunologic ...Ornamental marigold can cause an allergic reaction in individuals sensitive to the Asteraceae/Compositae family. Members of this family include ragweed, chrysanthemums, marigolds, daisies, and many other herbs (11).

(Read more about ORNAMENTAL MARIGOLD)

General ...Orally and parenterally, thiamine is generally well tolerated.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Parenterally: Hypersensitivity reactions including angioedema and anaphylaxis.

Immunologic ...Orally, thiamine might rarely cause dermatitis and other allergic reactions. Parenterally, thiamine can cause anaphylactoid and hypersensitivity reactions, but this is also rare (<0.1%). Reported symptoms and events include feelings of warmth, tingling, pruritus, urticaria, tightness of the throat, cyanosis, respiratory distress, gastrointestinal bleeding, pulmonary edema, angioedema, hypotension, and death (15,35585,105445).
In one case report, a 46-year-old female presented with systemic allergic dermatitis after applying a specific product (Inzitan, containing lidocaine, dexamethasone, cyanocobalamin and thiamine) topically by iontophoresis; the allergic reaction was attributed to thiamine (91170).

(Read more about THIAMINE)

General ...Orally, vitamin A is generally well-tolerated at doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL).
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: In very high doses, vitamin A can cause pseudotumor cerebri, pain, liver toxicity, coma, and even death.

Dermatologic ...Chronic oral use of large amounts of vitamin A causes symptoms of vitamin A toxicity including dry skin and lips; cracking, scaling, and itchy skin; skin redness and rash; hyperpigmentation; shiny skin, and massive skin peeling (7135,95051). Hypervitaminosis A can cause brittle nails, cheilitis, gingivitis, and hair loss (15,95051). Adverse effects from a single ingestion of a large dose of vitamin A is more common in young children than adults (15). In children, approximately 25,000 IU/kg can cause skin redness and generalized peeling of the skin a few days later and may last for several weeks (15).

Gastrointestinal ...There is some evidence that oral vitamin A supplementation might increase the risk of diarrhea in children. Although vitamin A can prevent diarrhea and reduce mortality in malnourished children, doses as low as 10,000 IU weekly for 40 weeks have been associated with diarrhea in well-nourished children (319). Diarrhea (82326,82389), nausea (7135,100329), abdominal pain (95051), abdominal fullness (100329), and vomiting (7135,82559,95051,95055,109755) have been reported following use of large doses of oral vitamin A. Adverse effects from a single ingestion of a large dose of vitamin A is more common in young children than adults (15). In children, approximately 25,000 IU/kg can cause vomiting and diarrhea (15). Chronic use of large amounts of vitamin A causes symptoms of vitamin A toxicity including anorexia, abdominal discomfort, and nausea and vomiting (7135).

Genitourinary ...Hypervitaminosis A can cause reduced menstrual flow (15). Intravaginally, all-trans retinoic acid can cause vaginal discharge, itching, irritation, and burning (9199).

Hematologic ...Hypervitaminosis A can cause spider angiomas, anemia, leukopenia, leukocytosis, and thrombocytopenia (15,95051).

Hepatic ...Since the liver is the main storage site for vitamin A, hypervitaminosis A can cause hepatotoxicity, with elevated liver enzymes such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT, formerly SGPT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST, formerly SGOT), as well as fibrosis, cirrhosis, hepatomegaly, portal hypertension, and death (6377,7135,95051).

Musculoskeletal ...Vitamin A can increase the risk for osteoporosis and fractures. Observational research has found that chronic, high intake of vitamin A 10,000 IU or more per day is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and hip fracture in postmenopausal adults, as well as overall risk of fracture in middle-aged males (7712,7713,9190). A meta-analysis of these and other large observational studies shows that high dietary intake of vitamin A or retinol is associated with a 23% to 29% greater risk of hip fracture when compared with low dietary intake (107294). High serum levels of vitamin A as retinol also increase the risk of fracture in males. Males with high serum retinol levels are seven times more likely to fracture a hip than those with lower serum retinol levels (9190). Vitamin A damage to bone can occur subclinically, without signs or symptoms of hypervitaminosis A. Some researchers are concerned that consumption of vitamin A fortified foods such as margarine and low-fat dairy products in addition to vitamin A or multivitamin supplements might cause excessive serum retinol levels. Older people have higher levels of vitamin A and might be at increased risk for vitamin A-induced osteoporosis.
Vitamin A's effects on bone resorption could lead to hypercalcemia (95051).
Hypervitaminosis can cause slow growth, premature epiphyseal closure, painful hyperostosis of the long bones, general joint pain, osteosclerosis, muscle pain, and calcium loss from the bones (15,95051). One child experienced severe bone pain after taking vitamin A 600,000 IU daily for more than 3 months (95051). Vitamin A was discontinued and symptoms lessened over a period of 2 weeks. The patient made a full recovery 2 months later.

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, adverse effects from a single large dose of vitamin A are more common in young children than adults (15). Headache, increased cerebrospinal fluid pressure, vertigo, and blurred vision have been reported following an acute oral dose of vitamin A 500,000 IU (7135). In children, approximately 25,000 IU/kg can cause headache, irritability, drowsiness, dizziness, delirium, and coma (15). Chronic use of large amounts of vitamin A causes symptoms of vitamin A toxicity including fatigue, malaise, lethargy, and irritability (7135).
There are reports of bulging of the anterior fontanelle associated with an acute high oral dose of vitamin A in infants (7135,90784,95053,95054). In children, approximately 25,000 IU/kg can cause increased intracranial pressure with bulging fontanelles in infants (15). Also, muscular incoordination has been reported following short-term high doses of vitamin A (7135).
A case of intracranial hypertension involving diffuse headaches and brief loss of vision has been reported secondary to topical use of vitamin A. The patient was using over-the-counter vitamin A preparations twice daily including Avotin 0.05% cream, Retin-A gel 0.01%, and Isotrexin gel containing isotretinoin 0.05% and erythromycin 2%, for treatment of facial acne. Upon exam, the patient was noted to have bilateral optic disc edema. The patient discontinued use of topical vitamin A products. Two months later, the patient reported decreased headaches and an improvement in bilateral optic disc edema was seen (95056).

Ocular/Otic ...In children, oral vitamin A approximately 25,000 IU/kg can cause swelling of the optic disk, bulging eyeballs, and visual disturbances (15). Adverse effects from a single ingestion of a large dose of vitamin A are more common in young children than adults (15).

Oncologic ...There is concern that high intake of vitamin A might increase some forms of cancer. Population research suggests high vitamin A intake might increase the risk of gastric carcinoma (9194).

Psychiatric ...Chronic oral use of large amounts of vitamin A causes symptoms of vitamin A toxicity, which can include symptoms that mimic severe depression or schizophrenic disorder (7135).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...There is some evidence that oral vitamin A supplementation might increase the risk of pneumonia and diarrhea in children. Although vitamin A can prevent diarrhea and reduce mortality in malnourished children, doses as low as 10,000 IU weekly for 40 weeks have been associated with pneumonia and diarrhea in well-nourished children (319). In preschool children, high-dose vitamin A also increases the risk of respiratory infection (82288).

Other ...Chronic use of large amounts of vitamin A (>25,000 IU daily for more than 6 years or 100,000 IU daily for more than 6 months) can cause symptoms of vitamin A toxicity including mild fever and excessive sweating (7135). High intakes of vitamin A may result in a failure to gain weight normally in children and weight loss in adults (15).

(Read more about VITAMIN A)

General ...Orally, dietary and supplemental zeaxanthin are generally well tolerated. No adverse effects have been reported in clinical research.

(Read more about ZEAXANTHIN)