| Ingredients | Amount Per Serving |
|---|---|
|
Calories
|
70 Calorie(s) |
|
Calories from Fat
|
25 Calorie(s) |
|
Total Fat
|
2.5 Gram(s) |
|
Total Carbohydrates
|
9 Gram(s) |
|
Dietary Fiber
|
6 Gram(s) |
|
Soluble Fiber
|
1 Gram(s) |
|
Insoluble Fiber
|
4 Gram(s) |
|
Sugar
|
0 Gram(s) |
|
Protein
|
6 Gram(s) |
|
(Ca)
(naturally occuring)
|
66 mg |
|
(Fe)
(naturally occuring)
|
2 mg |
|
Perfect Fiber Blend
|
18 Gram(s) |
|
(seed)
(Organic)
|
|
|
(seed)
|
|
|
Poten-Zyme Fermented Whole Food Fiber Blend
|
1.5 Gram(s) |
|
(sprout)
(Fermented)
|
|
|
(sprout)
(Fermented)
|
|
|
(sprout)
(Fermented)
|
|
|
(sprout)
(Organic, fermented)
|
|
|
Garbanzo Bean
(sprout)
(Fermented)
|
|
|
Lentil
(sprout)
(Fermented)
|
|
|
Adzuki Bean
(sprout)
(Fermented)
|
|
|
(seed sprout)
(Organic, fermented)
|
|
|
(seed sprout)
(Fermented)
|
|
|
(seed sprout)
(Organic, fermented)
|
|
|
(seed sprout)
(Fermented)
|
|
|
(seed sprout)
(Organic, fermented)
|
|
|
(Alpha-Linolenic Acid)
|
1.1 Gram(s) |
|
Cinnamon
(Organic)
|
127 mg |
|
(Stevia )
(leaf)
|
20 mg |
|
Probiotic Blend
|
2 mg |
|
(Lactobacillus plantarum )
|
|
|
(Bifidobacterium animalis lactis )
|
|
|
(Bifidobacterium bifidum )
|
|
|
(Lactobacillus rhamnosus )
|
|
|
(Bifidobacterium breve )
|
|
|
(Lactobacillus casei )
|
|
|
(Lactobacillus salivarius )
|
|
|
(Lactobacillus acidophilus )
|
Below is general information about the effectiveness of the known ingredients contained in the product Super Seed. Some ingredients may not be listed. This information does NOT represent a recommendation for or a test of this specific product as a whole.
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE
Below is general information about the safety of the known ingredients contained in the product Super Seed. Some ingredients may not be listed. This information does NOT represent a recommendation for or a test of this specific product as a whole.
LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts typically found in foods (7141,7142,7144). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of alpha-linolenic acid when used in larger, medicinal amounts.
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts typically found in foods (7141,7142,7145).
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of alpha-linolenic acid during pregnancy and lactation when used in larger, medicinal amounts; avoid using.
LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in food amounts. Amaranth seed and leaves are commonly used in foods (3833,5063,31069,31083,104835).
POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally as medicine, short-term. Amaranth oil 20 mL has been used daily with apparent safety for up to 3 weeks (104834,104836,104837).
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using as medicine.
LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Bifidobacterium lactis has been safely used alone or in combination with other probiotics in clinical trials lasting up to 12 weeks (92255,98502,105158,107572,107581,107586,110979,110985,110986,110992)(110993,110998,110999).
CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in children of most ages.
Bifidobacterium lactis has been safely used alone or in combination with other probiotics in infants and children for up to 15 months (3169,3458,92265,95381,95382,98736,105149,107582,107583,107585)(107587,107590,110984,110987,110988,110991,110994,110995). A combination probiotic containing B. lactis and Lactobacillus acidophilus (HOWARU Protect, Danisco) has been used safely for up to 6 months in children aged 3-5 years (16847). A specific combination of B. lactis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and L. acidophilus (Complete Probiotic Platinum) has also been used safely for up to 18 months in children aged 4 months to 5 years (103436). In addition, in children ages 4-17 years, 1 billion CFUs of a 1:1:1 combination of B. lactis CECT 8145, Lacticasebacillus casei CECT 9104, and Bifidobacterium longum CECT 7347 has been used safely for 12 weeks (107531). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of B. lactis in preterm infants with a birth weight under 1000 grams. Cases of bacteremia have occurred rarely in preterm infants given other probiotics (102416,111610,111612,111613,111850,111852,111853). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning about cases of serious infections caused by probiotics reported in very preterm or very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams (111610). Similarly, the American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to these infants due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy (111608).
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available.
A meta-analysis of four clinical trials shows that taking probiotics during pregnancy increases the relative risk of pre-eclampsia by 85% when compared with placebo. Although the specific effects of Bifidobacterium lactis are unclear from this analysis, three of the included studies used B. lactis in combination with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (105185). More information is needed to determine if certain patients are at increased risk.
LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Bifidobacterium bifidum has been safely used alone or in combination with other probiotics in clinical trials lasting up to one year (1731,12775,14338,92255,107580,110972,110974,110978). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of non-viable, heat-killed B. bifidum formulations when used orally.
CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in children of most ages.
Bifidobacterium bifidum has been safely used alone or in combination with other probiotics in clinical trials in infants and children for up to 18 months (161,90286,90602,98736,103436,110971,110976,110924). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of B. bifidum in preterm infants with a birth weight under 1000 grams. Cases of bacteremia have occurred rarely in preterm infants given other probiotics (102416,111610,111612,111613,111850,111852,111853). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning about cases of serious infections caused by probiotics reported in very preterm or very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams (111610). Similarly, the American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to these infants due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy (111608).
PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when Bifidobacterium bifidum is used orally and appropriately, short-term.
A combination of B. bifidum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Lacticaseibacillus casei has been used with apparent safety for 6 weeks starting at 24-28 weeks' gestation (95416,98430).
LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of Bifidobacterium bifidum during lactation.
However, there are currently no reasons to expect safety concerns when used appropriately.
LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Bifidobacterium breve has been safely used alone or in combination with other probiotics in clinical trials lasting up to one year (3261,6087,11379,12769,12775,14338,14370,14371,103447,111002)(111003,111005).
CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in children of most ages.
Bifidobacterium breve has been safely used alone or in combination with other probiotics in infants and children for up to 12 months (17726,35377,92256,103449,105150,105151,107497,107598,111001)(111004,111008,111015). Cases of bacteremia have occurred rarely in children (107597). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of B. breve in preterm infants with a birth weight under 1000 grams. Cases of bacteremia have occurred rarely in preterm infants given B. breve or other probiotics (102416,111610,111612,111613,111850,111852,111853). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning about cases of serious infections caused by probiotics reported in very preterm or very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams (111610). Similarly, the American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to these infants due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy (111608).
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of Bifidobacterium breve during pregnancy or lactation.
However, there are currently no reasons to expect safety concerns when used appropriately.
POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately (11438,11442).
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.
LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (7555,12928,12946,95817). However, excessive doses should be avoided. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: Age 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51+ years, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stone, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Other clinical studies suggest that, when combined with vitamin D supplementation, calcium supplementation is not associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Other analyses report conflicting results and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day, to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484), and to combine calcium supplementation with vitamin D supplementation (93533).
POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. The National Academy of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51 years and older, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Other clinical studies suggest that, when combined with vitamin D supplementation, calcium supplementation is not associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Other analyses report conflicting results and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients to not consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day, to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484), and to combine calcium supplementation with vitamin D supplementation (93533).
CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately.
Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (17506).
CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses.
The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome.
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (945,1586,3263,3264,17506).
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prescribing oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancy to those with low dietary calcium intake to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses.
The Institute of Medicine sets the same daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age independent of pregnancy status: 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg (17506). Doses over these amounts might increase the risk of neonatal hypocalcemia-induced seizures possibly caused by transient neonatal hypoparathyroidism in the setting of excessive calcium supplementation during pregnancy, especially during the third trimester. Neonatal hypocalcemia is a risk factor for neonatal seizures (97345).
LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (104531,104532).
POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts, short-term. Chia has been used safely at doses up to 40 grams daily for up to 6 months (16124,97940). ...when used topically, short-term. A product containing chia seed oil 4% has been applied to the skin safely for up to 8 weeks (25537).
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.
LIKELY SAFE ...when ground flaxseed is used orally and appropriately. Ground flaxseed has been safely used in numerous clinical trials in doses up to 30-60 grams daily for up to 1 year (6803,6808,8020,10952,10978,12908,12910) (16760,16761,16762,16765,16766,18224,21191,21194,21196,21198) (21199,21200,22176,22179,22180,22181,65866,66065) (101943,101949,101950).
POSSIBLY SAFE ...when flaxseed lignan extract or mucilage is used orally and appropriately. Some clinical research shows that a specific flaxseed lignan extract (Flax Essence, Jarrow Formulas) 600 mg daily can be used with apparent safety for up to 12 weeks (16768). Additional clinical research shows that other flaxseed lignin extracts can be used with apparent safety for up to 6 months (21193,21197,21200). In one clinical trial, flaxseed mucilage was used with apparent safety at a dose of up to 5120 mg daily for up to 12 weeks (108047)....when flaxseed is used topically in a warm poultice (101946).
POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when raw or unripe flaxseed is used orally. Raw flaxseed contains potentially toxic cyanogenic glycosides (linustatin, neolinustatin, and linamarin); however, these glycosides have not been detected after flaxseed is baked (5899). Unripe flaxseeds are also thought to be poisonous when consumed due to cyanide content.
PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally.
Flaxseed can have mild estrogenic effects. Theoretically, this might adversely affect pregnancy (9592,12907); however, there is no reliable clinical evidence about the effects of flaxseed on pregnancy outcomes.
LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.
LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. For people age 14 and older with adequate iron stores, iron supplements are safe when used in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 45 mg per day of elemental iron. The UL is not meant to apply to those who receive iron under medical supervision (7135,96621). To treat iron deficiency, most people can safely take up to 300 mg elemental iron per day (15). ...when used intravenously and appropriately. Ferric carboxymaltose 200 mg and iron sucrose 200 mg have been given intravenously for up to 10 doses with no reported serious adverse effects (91179). A meta-analysis of clinical studies of hemodialysis patients shows that administering high-dose intravenous (IV) iron does not increase the risk of hospitalization, infection, cardiovascular events, or death when compared with low-dose IV iron, oral iron, or no iron treatment (102861). A more recent meta-analysis of clinical studies of all patient populations shows that administering IV iron does not increase the risk of hospital length of stay or mortality, although the risk of infection is increased by 16% when compared with oral iron or no iron (110186). Another meta-analysis of 3 large clinical trials in patients with heart failure shows that IV ferric carboxymaltose at a dose of around 1500 mg every 6 months for a year does not increase the incidence of adverse effects when compared with placebo (113901). Despite these findings, there are rare reports of hypophosphatemia and/or osteomalacia (112603,112608,112609,112610,113905).
LIKELY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. Doses of 30 mg/kg are associated with acute toxicity. Long-term use of high doses of iron can cause hemosiderosis and multiple organ damage. The estimated lethal dose of iron is 180-300 mg/kg; however, doses as low as 60 mg/kg have also been lethal (15).
CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (7135,91183,112601).
CHILDREN: LIKELY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive amounts.
Tell patients who are not iron-deficient not to use doses above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 40 mg per day of elemental iron for infants and children aged 0-13 years and 45 mg per day for children aged 14-18 years. Higher doses frequently cause gastrointestinal side effects such as constipation and nausea (7135,20097). Iron is the most common cause of pediatric poisoning deaths. Doses as low as 60 mg/kg can be fatal (15).
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately.
Iron is safe during pregnancy and breast-feeding in patients with adequate iron stores when used in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 45 mg daily of elemental iron (7135,96625,110180).
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY UNSAFE
when used orally in high doses.
Tell patients who are not iron deficient to avoid exceeding the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 45 mg daily of elemental iron. Higher doses frequently cause gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea and vomiting (7135) and might increase the risk of preterm labor (100969). High hemoglobin concentrations at the time of delivery are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes (7135,20109).
LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Lacticaseibacillus casei has been safely used alone or in combination with other ingredients in studies lasting up to 8 weeks (90230,112517).
CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in children of most ages.
Lacticaseibacillus casei has been safely used alone in studies lasting up to 4 months (14373,107544). Also, a specific mixture (Latopic, Biomed S.A.) providing 1 billion CFUs of L. casei ŁOCK 0919 50%, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus ŁOCK 0900 25%, and L. rhamnosus ŁOCK 0908 25% has been used with apparent safety for 3 months in children under 2 years of age (107510). In addition, in children ages 4-17 years, a 1:1:1 combination of L. casei CECT 9104, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis CECT 8145, and Bifidobacterium longum CECT 7347 providing 1 billion CFUs has been used with apparent safety for 12 weeks (107531). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of L. casei in preterm infants with a birth weight under 1000 grams. Cases of bacteremia have occurred rarely in preterm infants given other probiotics (102416,111610,111612,111613,111850,111852,111853). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning about cases of serious infections caused by probiotics reported in very preterm or very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams (111610). Similarly, the American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to these infants due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy (111608).
PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately.
A combination of Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium bifidum has been used with apparent safety for 6 weeks, starting at 24-28 weeks' gestation (95416,98430).
LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of Lacticaseibacillus casei during lactation.
However, there are currently no reasons to expect safety concerns when used appropriately.
LIKELY SAFE ...when live Lactiplantibacillus plantarum is used orally and appropriately. L. plantarum has been safely used alone or in combination with other probiotics in studies lasting up to 9 months (6087,14370,14371,90255,105136,107515,107552,107555,107557,107559)(110961,111963,111966,111973,111976,111979,111983,111986,111990,111994).
POSSIBLY SAFE ...when heat-killed Lactiplantibacillus plantarum is used orally and appropriately. Non-viable L. plantarum strains have been safely used in doses of 50 mg daily for 4 weeks, 10 mg daily for up to 12 months, or up to 300 billion cells daily for up to 12 weeks (107530,111985,111988,111995). ...when L. plantarum is used intravaginally and appropriately. L. plantarum P17630 has been used with apparent safety daily for 6 days, then weekly for 16 weeks (98435). Also, L. plantarum 57B has been used with apparent safety along with Limosilactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus gasseri as part of a specific product (InVag) for up to 7 days (111961).
CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in children of most ages.
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum has been safely used in children aged 7-15 years for up to 4 weeks (107540), in healthy newborns for 7 days (111989), and in children up to age 5 years for up to 90 days (111975,111981,111982). Also, L. plantarum has been used safely as a component of a combination probiotic product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) in children aged 2-12 years for up to 3 months (107497) or in combination with Lacticaseibacillus paracasei for up to 12 weeks (107556). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of L. plantarum in preterm infants with a birth weight under 1000 grams. Cases of bacteremia have occurred rarely in preterm infants given other probiotics (102416,111610,111612,111613,111850,111852,111853). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning about cases of serious infections caused by probiotics reported in very preterm or very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams (111610). Similarly, the American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to these infants due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy (111608).
PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately.
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (Lp299v, DSM 9843) has been used with apparent safety in doses of 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily in combination with iron, ascorbic acid, and folic acid daily from 10-12 weeks' gestation until delivery (107550).
LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum during lactation.
However, there are currently no reasons to expect safety concerns when used appropriately.
LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Lactobacillus acidophilus has been safely used as part of multi-ingredient probiotic products in studies lasting up to nine months (1731,6087,14370,14371,90231,90296,92255,103438,12775,107581)(110950,110970,110979,110998,111785,111793). ...when used intravaginally and appropriately. L. acidophilus has been used safely in studies lasting up to 12 weeks (12108,13176,13177,90265). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of non-viable, heat-killed L. acidophilus formulations when used orally.
CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in children of most ages.
Lactobacillus acidophilus has been safely used for up to 5 days (96887). Also, combination probiotics containing L. acidophilus have been used with apparent safety in various doses and durations. L. acidophilus has been combined with Bifidobacterium animalis (HOWARU Protect, Danisco) for up to 6 months in children 3-5 years old (16847), with Bifidobacterium bifidum for 6 weeks (90602,96890), with Bifidobacterium bifidum and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (Complete Probiotic Platinum) for 18 months in children 4 months to 5 years of age (103436), and in a specific product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) containing a total of 8 species for 3 months in children 2-12 years old (107497). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of L. acidophilus in preterm infants with a birth weight under 1000 grams. Cases of bacteremia have occurred rarely in preterm infants given other probiotics (102416,111610,111612,111613,111850,111852,111853). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning about cases of serious infections caused by probiotics reported in very preterm or very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams (111610). Similarly, the American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to these infants due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy (111608).
PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately.
A combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum has been used with apparent safety for 6 weeks, starting at 24-28 weeks' gestation (95416,98430).
LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of Lactobacillus acidophilus during lactation.
However, there are currently no reasons to expect safety concerns when used appropriately.
LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in amounts commonly found in foods.
POSSIBLY SAFE ...when the seed or seed oil is used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts, short-term. Pumpkin seed has been used with apparent safety in a dose of up to 10 grams daily for up to 12 months (92383). Pumpkin seed oil has been used with apparent safety in a dose of up to 400 mg daily for up to 6 months (92378). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of pumpkin seed oil when used topically.
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using amounts greater than those found in food.
LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in food amounts. Quinoa is a common food source for many people (99147,99148,99149). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of quinoa when used in medicinal amounts.
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in food amounts.
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of quinoa in medicinal amounts; avoid using.
LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in food. Sesame has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912).
POSSIBLY SAFE ...when sesame oil is used orally and appropriately, short-term. Sesame oil has been used with apparent safety in doses up to 35 grams daily for up to 12 weeks (96179,96180,108354). The sesame constituent sesamin has been used with apparent safety at doses of 200 mg daily for 6 weeks (103230) and 10 mg daily for 12 weeks (99863). Sesame oil 150 mL has also been administered via nasogastric tube with apparent safety as a single dose (27645). ...when sesame oil is used in a nasal spray, short-term. A specific nasal spray (Nozoil) containing sesame oil has been used with apparent safety for up to 20 days (27658,27659,27660). ...when sesame oil is applied topically (96178,103227,103228). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of other forms of sesame when used in medicinal amounts.
CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when sesame oil is used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts, short-term.
Sesame oil 5 mL has been used safely at bedtime for up to 3 days (27647).
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sesame when used in medicinal amounts during pregnancy and lactation.
LIKELY SAFE ...when consumed in food amounts (18). Although the fruit contains cyanogenic glycosides, the concentrations are very low (18). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sorghum used in amounts larger than those found in foods.
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available.
LIKELY SAFE ...when certain stevia constituents, including stevioside and rebaudiosides A, D, and M, are used orally as sweeteners in foods. These constituents have generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status in the US for this purpose (16699,16700,16702,16705,16706,108049). The stevia constituent stevioside has been safely used in doses of up to 1500 mg daily for 2 years (11809,11810,11811,113006). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of whole stevia or stevia extracts when used orally. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has determined that the acceptable intake of steviol glycosides is 4 mg/kg daily (106456); however, it is unclear how this relates to the use of whole stevia or stevia extract.
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.
LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in amounts commonly found in foods. When used as a substitute for other dietary oils, the recommended intake of high-oleic acid sunflower oil is 20 grams (1.5 tablespoons) daily (9780,98563). ...when used topically and appropriately, short-term. Sunflower oil has been applied to the skin twice daily for up to 6 weeks (76687). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sunflower oil when used as an oral rinse.
CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in amounts commonly found in foods.
CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when applied topically and appropriately, short-term.
Sunflower oil has been applied to the skin of infants daily for up to 2 months (96144,96145,105524,108143). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sunflower oil when used orally in larger amounts as medicine.
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in amounts commonly found in foods.
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sunflower oil when used in amounts greater than those found in food.
Below is general information about the interactions of the known ingredients contained in the product Super Seed. Some ingredients may not be listed. This information does NOT represent a recommendation for or a test of this specific product as a whole.
Theoretically, taking Bifidobacterium lactis with antibiotic drugs might decrease the effectiveness of B. lactis.
 Details
|
Theoretically, taking Bifidobacterium. bifidum with antibiotic drugs might decrease the effectiveness of B. bifidum.
Details
|
Theoretically, taking Bifidobacterium breve with antibiotic drugs might decrease the effectiveness of B. breve.
Details
|
Calcium citrate might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity. Other types of calcium do not increase aluminum absorption.
Details
Calcium citrate can increase the absorption of aluminum when taken with aluminum hydroxide. The increase in aluminum levels may become toxic, particularly in individuals with kidney disease (21631). However, the effect of calcium citrate on aluminum absorption is due to the citrate anion rather than calcium cation. Calcium acetate does not appear to increase aluminum absorption (93006).
|
Calcium reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.
Details
Advise patients to take bisphosphonates at least 30 minutes before calcium, but preferably at a different time of day. Calcium supplements decrease absorption of bisphosphonates (12937).
|
Taking calcipotriene with calcium might increase the risk for hypercalcemia.
Details
Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (12938). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with calcium supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.
|
Intravenous calcium may decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers; oral calcium is unlikely to have this effect.
Details
Intravenous calcium is used to decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers in the management of overdose. Intravenous calcium gluconate has been used before intravenous verapamil (Isoptin) to prevent or reduce the hypotensive effects without affecting the antiarrhythmic effects (6124). But there is no evidence that dietary or supplemental calcium when taken orally interacts with calcium channel blockers (12939,12947).
|
Co-administration of intravenous calcium and ceftriaxone can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys.
Details
Avoid administering intravenous calcium in any form, such as parenteral nutrition or Lactated Ringers, within 48 hours of intravenous ceftriaxone. Case reports in neonates show that administering intravenous ceftriaxone and calcium can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys. In several cases, neonates have died as a result of this interaction (15794,21632). So far there are no reports in adults; however, there is still concern that this interaction might occur in adults.
|
Using intravenous calcium with digoxin might increase the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias.
Details
|
Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem.
Details
Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, calcium might increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of diltiazem.
|
Calcium seems to reduce levels of dolutegravir.
Details
Advise patients to take dolutegravir either 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium carbonate 1200 mg concomitantly with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces plasma levels of dolutegravir by almost 40%. Calcium appears to decrease levels of dolutegravir through chelation (93578).
|
Calcium seems to reduce levels of elvitegravir.
Details
Advise patients to take elvitegravir either 2 hours before or 2 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium along with elvitegravir can reduce blood levels of elvitegravir through chelation (94166).
|
Calcium seems to reduce the absorption and effectiveness of levothyroxine.
Details
|
Theoretically, concomitant use of calcium and lithium may increase this risk of hypercalcemia.
Details
Clinical research suggests that long-term use of lithium may cause hypercalcemia in 10% to 60% of patients (38953). Theoretically, concomitant use of lithium and calcium supplements may further increase this risk.
|
Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of quinolone antibiotics.
Details
|
Calcium may reduce levels of raltegravir.
Details
Pharmacokinetic research shows that taking a single dose of calcium carbonate 3000 mg along with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily modestly decreases the mean area under the curve of raltegravir, but the decrease does not necessitate a dose adjustment of raltegravir (94164). However, a case of elevated HIV-1 RNA levels and documented resistance to raltegravir has been reported for a patient taking calcium carbonate 1 gram three times daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU three times daily in combination with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 11 months. It is thought that calcium reduced raltegravir levels by chelation, leading to treatment failure (94165).
|
Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of sotalol.
Details
Advise patients to separate doses by at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium. Calcium appears to reduce the absorption of sotalol, probably by forming insoluble complexes (10018).
|
Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics.
Details
Advise patients to take oral tetracyclines at least 2 hours before, or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements. Taking calcium at the same time as oral tetracyclines can reduce tetracycline absorption. Calcium binds to tetracyclines in the gut (1843).
|
Taking calcium along with thiazides might increase the risk of hypercalcemia and renal failure.
Details
Thiazides reduce calcium excretion by the kidneys (1902). Using thiazides along with moderately large amounts of calcium carbonate increases the risk of milk-alkali syndrome (hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis, renal failure). Patients may need to have their serum calcium levels and/or parathyroid function monitored regularly.
|
Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil.
Details
Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, use of calcium supplements may increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of verapamil.
|
Theoretically, antibiotics might interfere with the metabolism of flaxseed constituents, which could potentially alter the effects of flaxseed.
Details
Some potential benefits of flaxseed are thought to be due to its lignan content. Secoisolariciresinol diglucoside (SDG), a major lignan precursor, is found in high concentrations in flaxseed. SDG is converted by bacteria in the colon to the lignans enterolactone and enterodiol (5897,8022,8023,9592). Antibiotics alter the flora of the colon, which could theoretically alter the metabolism of flaxseed.
|
Theoretically, using flaxseed in combination with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs might have additive effects and increase the risk of bleeding.
Details
|
Theoretically, flaxseed might have additive effects when used with antidiabetes drugs and increase the risk for hypoglycemia.
Details
|
Theoretically, flaxseed might have additive effects when used with antihypertensive drugs and increase the risk of hypotension.
Details
|
Theoretically, taking flaxseed might decrease the effects of estrogens.
Details
Flaxseed contains lignans with mild estrogenic and possible antiestrogenic effects. The lignans seem to compete with circulating endogenous estrogen and might reduce estrogen binding to estrogen receptors, resulting in an anti-estrogen effect (8868,9593). It is unclear if this effect transfers to exogenously administered estrogens.
|
Iron reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.
Details
Advise patients that doses of bisphosphonates should be separated by at least two hours from doses of all other medications, including supplements such as iron. Divalent cations, including iron, can decrease absorption of bisphosphonates by forming insoluble complexes in the gastrointestinal tract (15).
|
Theoretically, taking chloramphenicol with iron might reduce the response to iron therapy in iron deficiency anemia.
Details
|
Administration of intravenous iron within one month of denosumab administration might increase the risk of severe hypophosphatemia and hypocalcemia.
Details
A case of severe hypocalcemia (albumin corrected calcium 6.88 mg/dL, ionized calcium 3.68 mg/dL) and hypophosphatemia (<0.5 mg/dL) with respiratory acidosis, QT interval prolongation, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was reported in a 76-year-old male who had received an iron polymaltose infusion within 2 weeks of a subcutaneous injection of denosumab. Serum parathyroid hormone was also elevated (348 pg/mL). Subsequent iron infusions with iron polymaltose and ferric carboxymaltose were followed by transient hypophosphatemia, but without hypocalcemia. Additionally, a literature review describes 6 additional cases of hypophosphatemia and hypocalcemia in patients 52-92 years of age who had been administered intravenous iron as either ferric carboxymaltose or iron polymaltose and subcutaneous denosumab within 1-4 weeks of each other (113905).
|
Iron might decrease dolutegravir levels by reducing its absorption.
Details
Advise patients to take dolutegravir at least 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking iron. Pharmacokinetic research shows that iron can decrease the absorption of dolutegravir from the gastrointestinal tract through chelation (93578). When taken under fasting conditions, a single dose of ferrous fumarate 324 mg orally along with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces overall exposure to dolutegravir by 54% (94190).
|
Theoretically, taking iron along with integrase inhibitors might decrease the levels and clinical effects of these drugs.
Details
Iron is a divalent cation. There is concern that iron may decrease the absorption of integrase inhibitors from the gastrointestinal tract through chelation (93578). One pharmacokinetic study shows that iron can decrease blood levels of the specific integrase inhibitor dolutegravir through chelation (94190). Also, other pharmacokinetic research shows that other divalent cations such as calcium can decrease the absorption and levels of some integrase inhibitors through chelation (93578,93579).
|
Iron might decrease levodopa levels by reducing its absorption.
Details
Advise patients to separate doses of levodopa and iron as much as possible. There is some evidence in healthy people that iron forms chelates with levodopa, reducing the amount of levodopa absorbed by around 50% (9567). The clinical significance of this hasn't been determined.
|
Iron might decrease levothyroxine levels by reducing its absorption.
Details
Advise patients to separate levothyroxine and iron doses by at least 2 hours. Iron can decrease the absorption and efficacy of levothyroxine by forming insoluble complexes in the gastrointestinal tract (9568).
|
Iron might decrease methyldopa levels by reducing its absorption.
Details
|
Theoretically, iron might decrease mycophenolate mofetil levels by reducing its absorption.
Details
Advise patients to take iron 4-6 hours before, or 2 hours after, mycophenolate mofetil. It has been suggested that a decrease of absorption is possible, probably by forming nonabsorbable chelates. However, mycophenolate pharmacokinetics are not affected by iron supplementation in available clinical research (3046,20152,20153,20154,20155).
|
Iron might decrease penicillamine levels by reducing its absorption.
Details
Advise patients to separate penicillamine and iron doses by at least 2 hours. Oral iron supplements can reduce absorption of penicillamine by 30% to 70%, probably due to chelate formation. In people with Wilson's disease, this interaction has led to reduced efficacy of penicillamine (3046,3072,20156).
|
Iron might decrease levels of quinolone antibiotics by reducing their absorption.
Details
|
Iron might decrease levels of tetracycline antibiotics by reducing their absorption.
Details
Advise patients to take iron at least 2 hours before or 4 hours after tetracycline antibiotics. Concomitant use can decrease absorption of tetracycline antibiotics from the gastrointestinal tract by 50% to 90% (15).
|
Theoretically, taking Lacticaseibacillus casei with antibiotic drugs might decrease the effectiveness of L. casei.
Details
L. casei preparations usually contain live and active organisms. Therefore, simultaneously taking antibiotics might kill a significant number of the organisms (1740). Tell patients to separate administration of antibiotics and L. casei preparations by at least two hours.
|
Theoretically, taking Lactiplantibacillus plantarum with antibiotic drugs might decrease the effectiveness of L. plantarum.
Details
L. plantarum preparations usually contain live and active organisms. Therefore, simultaneously taking antibiotics might kill a significant number of the organisms (1740). Tell patients to separate administration of antibiotics and L. plantarum preparations by at least two hours.
|
Theoretically, taking Lactobacillus acidophilus with antibiotic drugs might decrease the effectiveness of L. acidophilus.
Details
L. acidophilus preparations usually contain live and active organisms. Therefore, simultaneously taking antibiotics might kill a significant number of the organisms (1740). Tell patients to separate administration of antibiotics and L. acidophilus preparations by at least two hours.
|
Pumpkin might reduce excretion and increase levels of lithium.
Details
Pumpkin is thought to have diuretic properties (92383). Theoretically, this might reduce excretion and increase levels of lithium. The dose of lithium might need to be decreased.
|
Taking sesame oil with antidiabetes drugs might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.
Details
Clinical studies show that sesame oil can decrease plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Some clinical research in patients taking glibenclamide shows that using sesame oil or a blend of sesame oil and rice bran oil in place of other oil for cooking reduces plasma glucose more than glibenclamide alone (27654,28139,96177,108350,108352,108355). Monitor blood glucose levels closely. Dose adjustments might be necessary.
|
Taking sesame oil with antihypertensive drugs might increase the risk of hypotension.
Details
Clinical research shows that replacing other cooking oil with sesame oil can lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in patients with or without hypertension. There is also some evidence that sesame oil has additive effects in patients also taking atenolol, nifedipine, and/or hydrochlorothiazide (27652,27654,27655,96179,108355,108357). In patients using nifedipine, using a blend of sesame oil and rice bran oil for cooking reduces both SBP and DBP more than nifedipine alone (96180).
|
Theoretically, sesame might increase the levels and clinical effects of CYP2C9 substrates.
Details
In vitro, sesame inhibits CYP2C9 (11028). However, this interaction has not been reported in humans.
|
Theoretically, sesame might alter the transport of P-glycoprotein substrates.
Details
|
Theoretically, sesame might interfere with tamoxifen.
Details
|
Theoretically, stevia might increase the risk for hypoglycemia when combined with antidiabetes drugs.
Details
Preliminary clinical research in patients with type 2 diabetes suggests that taking a single dose of stevia extract 1000 mg reduces postprandial blood glucose levels when taken with a meal (11812). However, other clinical research in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes suggests that taking stevioside 250 mg three times daily does not significantly affect blood glucose levels or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) after three months of treatment (16705).
|
Theoretically, combining stevia or stevia constituents with antihypertensive agents might increase the risk of hypotension.
Details
|
Theoretically, stevia might decrease clearance and increase levels of lithium.
Details
|
Theoretically, sunflower oil might decrease the effectiveness of antidiabetes medications.
Details
A diet using sunflower oil as a fat source can cause increased fasting blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes (8132). Dose adjustments to diabetes medications might be necessary.
|
Below is general information about the adverse effects of the known ingredients contained in the product Super Seed. Some ingredients may not be listed. This information does NOT represent a recommendation for or a test of this specific product as a whole.
General
...Orally, alpha-linolenic acid from dietary sources is well tolerated when used in the diet as a replacement for other sources of fat, such as saturated fats.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is some concern that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid might increase the risk for prostate cancer, although research is conflicting.
Oncologic ...Epidemiologic research suggests that high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid might increase risk for prostate cancer (1337,2558,7823,7147,12978). Other research suggests high intake or serum levels of alpha-linolenic acid does not increase the overall risk of prostate cancer (12961,15736); however, it might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer (12961). Association with prostate cancer appears to depend on the sources of alpha-linolenic acid. Dairy and meat sources has been positively associated with prostate cancer, whereas plant sources, such as flaxseed, don't seem to affect prostate cancer risk (12909). According to a clinical trial, intake of alpha-linolenic acid does not appear to increase levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) (91402). Also, longer-chain omega-3 fatty acids in fish oils are associated with a decreased risk of total and advanced prostate cancer (12961).
Other ...Alpha-linolenic acid is a type of fat, containing 9 kilocalories/gram, and may result in weight gain if consumed in excess. Patients should be advised that it's best to substitute alpha-linolenic acid in the diet for other sources of fat, such as saturated fats.
General ...Orally, amaranth seed and amaranth oil have been used with apparent safety in clinical research (6188,5063,31069,92235,104835,104835,104836,104837); however, most studies have not conducted a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes. One case of anaphylaxis related to consumption of amaranth seed from Amaranthus cruentus has been reported (99233).
Immunologic ...Orally, a case of anaphylaxis in a 60-year-old female was confirmed to be related to consumption of amaranth seed from Amaranthus cruentus (99233).
General
...Orally, Bifidobacterium lactis seems to be well tolerated by most patients.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Diarrhea.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is concern that probiotics may cause infections in some people.
Dermatologic ...In clinical research, two cases of rash, one with itching, were reported by patients taking a combination of Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei F19, and Lactobacillus acidophilus La5. However, it is not clear if these adverse effects were due to B. lactis, other probiotics, or the combination, or if the events were idiosyncratic (90236).
Gastrointestinal ...Bloating and flatulence have been reported with probiotic use; however, these adverse effects have not been reported from ingestion of Bifidobacterium lactis in particular. When taken orally, B. lactis can cause diarrhea and other gastrointestinal complaints in children (3169,95381,105149). Gastrointestinal complaints including worsening diarrhea, abdominal pain, constipation, stomach burn, and flatulence have been reported rarely (110986,110999).
Immunologic
...There have been cases of Bifidobacterium bacteremia in critically ill patients (102416,107599).
These cases are rare and none seem to be due to Bifidobacterium lactis alone.
A specific preparation (NBL probiotic ATP, Nobel) containing B. lactis, Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, fructo-oligosaccharides, galacto-oligosaccharides, colostrum, and lactoferrin was found to be a significant risk factor for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus colonization in premature infants. Although there was no direct link to determine causation, it was hypothesized that the probiotic mixture helped to mediate the acquisition and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (96890).
General
...Orally, Bifidobacterium bifidum seems to be well tolerated by most patients.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is concern that probiotics may cause infections in some people.
Gastrointestinal ...Bloating and flatulence have been reported with probiotic use; however, these adverse effects have not been reported from ingestion of Bifidobacterium bifidum in particular. One case of vomiting and fever has been reported in a clinical study for a single child taking B. bifidum and Lactobacillus acidophilus. It is unclear if the probiotics were the causal agent (90286).
Immunologic ...There have been cases of Bifidobacterium sepsis in critically ill patients (102416,107599). However, these cases are rare and none seem to be due to Bifidobacterium bifidum.
General
...Orally, Bifidobacterium breve seems to be well tolerated by most patients.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is concern that B. breve may cause bacteremia in certain patients.
Gastrointestinal ...Bloating and flatulence have been reported with probiotic use; however, these adverse effects have not been reported from ingestion of Bifidobacterium breve in particular.
Immunologic
...There have been rare cases of Bifidobacterium bacteremia related to probiotic use in critically ill infants and adults (102416,107597,107599).
In addition, cases of B. breve bacteremia have occurred in preterm infants or young children using probiotics (102416,107597). In a review of 298 term and preterm infants who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of a hospital in Japan and received B. breve BBG-01 over a five-year period, bacteremia occurred in six patients (2%). Concomitant conditions included gastrointestinal perforation, food-induced enterocolitis syndrome, adhesive ileus, ileal volvulus, and aspiration pneumonia following esophageal atresia repair (107597). In one case report, B. breve BBG-01 was provided to an infant starting two days after birth and the day of surgery for an omphalocele. The infant also had bilious gastric fluid with elevated inflammatory markers. It is thought that the intestinal surgical repair might have led to the translocation of the ingested B. breve (107596).
Some cases of B. breve bacteremia do not seem to be directly related to probiotic use. There have been rare cases of B. breve bacteremia and necrotizing fasciitis in patients with type 2 diabetes. One patient had pre-existing chronic diabetic foot ulcers and the other had abscesses near the groin (111007,111011). A childhood history of frequent consumption of fermented beverages containing B. breve was thought to have resulted in B. breve in the intestinal flora of one of these patients, aged 42 years (111011). However, it is unclear if consumption of an unknown quantity of B. breve more than 20 years previously would play a role in this outcome. There is also a rare case of ventriculoperitoneal shunt B. breve infection possibly related to poor oral hygiene and dentition (111014).
General ...Orally, buckwheat seems to be well tolerated (11438,11442). However, allergic reactions to buckwheat can occur in some adults and children. Symptoms can include skin sensitization, allergic rhinitis, asthma, conjunctivitis, nausea, vomiting, and anaphylaxis (11435,11436,11437,96060,96061). Occupational exposure to buckwheat, or household exposure through sleeping on a buckwheat husk stuffed-pillow can cause sensitization, of which symptoms include allergic rhinitis and asthma (11437,11443).
Immunologic
...Orally, buckwheat seems to be well tolerated (11438,11442).
However, allergic reactions to buckwheat can occur in some adults and children. Symptoms can include skin sensitization, allergic rhinitis, asthma, conjunctivitis, nausea, vomiting, and anaphylaxis (11435,11436,11437,96060,96061).
Occupational exposure to buckwheat, or household exposure through sleeping on a buckwheat husk stuffed-pillow can cause sensitization, of which symptoms include allergic rhinitis and asthma (11437,11443).
General
...Orally and intravenously, calcium is well-tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Belching, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, and stomach upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about calciphylaxis and kidney stones.
Cardiovascular
...There has been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI).
Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these results, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and CVD, CHD, or MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482). To minimize the possible risk of CVD, CHD, or MI, advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). While dietary intake of calcium is preferred over supplemental intake, advise patients who require calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D, as this combination does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI (93533).
Rarely, calcium intake can increase the risk of calciphylaxis, which usually occurs in patients with kidney failure. Calciphylaxis is the deposition of calcium phosphate in arterioles, which causes skin ulcers and skin necrosis. In a case report, a 64-year-old female with a history of neck fracture, sepsis, and ischemic colitis presented with painful leg ulcers due to calciphylaxis. She discontinued calcium and vitamin D supplementation and was treated with sodium thiosulfate and supportive care (95816).
Gastrointestinal ...Orally, calcium can cause belching, flatulence, nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, and diarrhea (1824,1843,12950,38803). Although constipation is frequently cited as an adverse effect of calcium, there is no scientific substantiation of this side effect (1824,1843,1844,1845,12950,38978). Calcium carbonate has been reported to cause acid rebound, but this is controversial (12935,12936).
Oncologic ...There is some concern that very high doses of calcium might increase the risk of prostate cancer. Some epidemiological evidence suggests that consuming over 2000 mg/day of dietary calcium might increase the risk for prostate cancer (4825,12949). Additional research suggests that calcium intake over 1500 mg/day might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer and prostate cancer mortality (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a small increase in prostate cancer risk (98894). However, contradictory research suggests no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall prostate cancer risk (14131,14132,104630). More evidence is needed to determine the effect of calcium, if any, on prostate cancer risk.
Renal ...Kidney stones have been reported in individuals taking calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily in combination with vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 4 years (93943).
General
...Orally and topically, chia seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Flatulence and soft stools.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Anaphylaxis in sensitive individuals.
Cardiovascular ...Chia contains a high concentration of alpha-linolenic acid (ALA). There is some concern that ALA might increase triglyceride levels more than other omega-3 fatty acids (12918); however, clinical research with a specific variety of chia called Salba shows that it does not significantly increase triglyceride levels (16124).
Gastrointestinal ...Orally, chia might cause mild gastrointestinal adverse effects. Some patients consuming chia 40 grams daily for up to 6 months reported mild and transient gastrointestinal adverse effects such as flatulence and soft stools; however, the frequency of these adverse effects was similar to patients consuming an oat bran control (97940). Bloating and flatulence have been reported with a chia flour-based sports beverage (112385).
Immunologic ...Orally, chia might cause anaphylaxis in sensitive individuals. A single case of IgE-mediated anaphylactic reaction has been reported for a patient who consumed chia seeds. Symptoms, including pruritus in the mouth, urticaria, facial angioedema, shortness of breath, and dizziness, developed a few days after consuming chia seeds. The reaction was attributed to sensitivity to proteins in chia seeds (91517).
Oncologic ...Chia seeds contain a high concentration of alpha-linolenic acid (ALA). Epidemiologic research suggests that high dietary intake of ALA might increase risk for prostate cancer (1337,2558,7823,7147,12978). Other research suggests high intake or serum levels of ALA does not increase the overall risk of prostate cancer (12961,15736); however, it might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer (12961). Association with prostate cancer appears to depend on the sources of ALA. Dairy and meat sources have been positively associated with prostate cancer, whereas plant sources, such as chia seed, don't seem to affect prostate cancer risk (12909). According to a clinical trial, intake of ALA does not appear to increase levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) (91402).
General
...Orally, flaxseed is usually well-tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Bloating, diarrhea, gastrointestinal complaints.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Severe allergic reactions such as and anaphylaxis.
Gastrointestinal
...Integrating flaxseed in the diet can cause digestive symptoms similar to other sources of dietary fiber including bloating, fullness, flatulence, abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, dyspepsia, and nausea (12910,16761,16765,21198,21200,22176,22179,65866,101943).
Higher doses are likely to cause more gastrointestinal side effects. Flaxseed can significantly increase the number of bowel movements and the risk for diarrhea (6803,8021,16765). Doses greater than 45 grams per day may not be tolerated for this reason (6802). Metallic aftertaste and bowel habit deterioration have also been reported in a clinical trial (21198).
There is some concern that taking large amounts of flaxseed could result in bowel obstruction due to the bulk forming laxative effects of flaxseed. Bowel obstruction occurred in one patient in a clinical trial (65866). However, this is not likely to occur if flaxseed is consumed with an adequate amount of fluids.
Immunologic ...Occasionally, allergic and anaphylactic reactions have been reported after ingestion of flaxseed (16761). Handling and processing flaxseed products might increase the risk of developing a positive antigen test to flaxseed and hypersensitivity (6809,12911,26471,26482).
Oncologic ...Flaxseed contains alpha-linolenic acid (ALA). High dietary intake of ALA has been associated with increased risk for prostate cancer (1337,2558,7823,7147,12978). However, ALA from plant sources, such as flaxseed, does not seem to increase this risk (12909).
Other ...Orally, partially defatted flaxseed, which is flaxseed with less alpha-linolenic acid, might increase triglyceride levels (6808). Raw or unripe flaxseed contains potentially toxic cyanogenic glycosides (linustatin, neolinustatin, and linamarin). These chemicals can increase blood levels and urinary excretion of thiocyanate in humans. However, these glycosides have not been detected after flaxseed is baked (5899).
General
...Orally or intravenously, iron is generally well tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, gastrointestinal irritation, nausea, and vomiting.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about oral or gastric ulcerations.
Intravenously: Case reports have raised concerns about hypophosphatemia and osteomalacia.
Cardiovascular
...There is debate regarding the association between coronary heart disease (CHD) or myocardial infarction (MI) and high iron intake or high body iron stores.
Some observational studies have reported that high body iron stores are associated with increased risk of MI and CHD (1492,9542,9544,9545,15175). Some observational studies reported that only high heme iron intake from dietary sources such as red meat are associated with increased risk of MI and CHD (1492,9546,15174,15205,15206,91180). However, the majority of research has found no association between serum iron levels and cardiovascular disease (1097,1099,9543,9547,9548,9549,9550,56469,56683).
There is one case of Kounis syndrome, also referred to as allergic angina or allergic myocardial infarction, in a 39-year-old female patient without previous coronary artery disease given intravenous ferric carboxymaltose. The patient experienced anaphylactic symptoms, including headache, abdominal pain, and breathing difficulties, 3 minutes after starting the infusion. She was further diagnosed with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (112607).
There is also a case of a 56-year-old female, negative for HFE mutation homozygosity, diagnosed with acquired iron overload cardiomyopathy after starting ferrous sulfate 325 mg twice daily 3 years prior for iron deficiency secondary to alcoholic cirrhosis with esophageal varices and encephalopathy. The patient had no follow-up care over the 3 years and denied any blood transfusions over that time (113906).
Dermatologic ...Cutaneous hemosiderosis, or skin staining, has been reported following intravenous (IV) iron infusion in various case reports. Most of these cases are due to extravasation following iron infusion (112605,112611). In one case, extravasation has occurred following iron derisomaltose infusion in a 41-year-old female with chronic kidney disease (112605). Rarely, diffuse cutaneous hermosiderosis has occurred. In one case, a 31-year-old female with excessive sweating developed cutaneous hemosiderosis in the armpits following an (IV) iron polymaltose infusion (112611).
Endocrine
...Population research in females shows that higher ferritin levels are associated with an approximately 1.
5-fold higher odds of developing gestational diabetes. Increased dietary intake of heme-iron, but not non-heme iron, is also associated with an increased risk for gestational diabetes. The effects of iron supplementation could not be determined from the evaluated research (96618). However, in a sub-analysis of a large clinical trial in pregnant adults, daily supplementation with iron 100 mg from 14 weeks gestation until delivery did not affect the frequency or severity of glucose intolerance or gestational weight gain (96619).
Intravenous (IV) iron may trigger hypophosphatemia in some patients (113905). A meta-analysis of clinical studies in adults with iron deficiency anemia shows that IV ferric carboxymaltose is associated with a higher risk of hypophosphatemia when compared with other IV formulations (i.e. iron dextran, iron isomaltoside, iron sucrose, and ferumoxytol) (115899). Severe hypophosphatemia requiring IV phosphate has also occurred following IV ferric carboxymaltose (112608,112610).
Additionally, cases of osteomalacia related to hypophosphatemia subsequent to parenteral iron administration have been rarely reported (112603,112609).
Gastrointestinal
...Orally, iron can cause dry mouth, gastrointestinal irritation, heartburn, abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting (96621,102864,104680,104684,110179,110185,110188,110189,110192,115894).
These adverse effects are uncommon at doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 45 mg per day of elemental iron in adults with normal iron stores (7135). Higher doses can be taken safely in adults with iron deficiency, but gastrointestinal side effects may occur (1095,20118,20119,56698,102864). Taking iron supplements with food seems to reduce gastrointestinal side effects (7135). However, food can also significantly reduce iron absorption. Iron should be taken on an empty stomach, unless it cannot be tolerated.
There are several formulations of iron products such as ferrous sulfate, ferrous gluconate, ferrous fumarate, and others. Manufacturers of some formulations, such as polysaccharide-iron complex products (Niferex-150, etc), claim to be better tolerated than other formulations; however, there is no reliable evidence to support this claim. Gastrointestinal tolerability relates mostly to the elemental iron dose rather than the formulation (17500).
Enteric-coated or controlled-release iron formulations might reduce nausea for some patients, however, these products also have lower absorption rates (17500).
Liquid oral preparations can blacken and stain teeth (20118).
Iron can also cause oral ulcerations and ulcerations of the gastric mucosa (56684,91182,96622,110179). In one case report, an 87-year-old female with Alzheimer disease experienced a mucosal ulceration, possibly due to holding a crushed ferrous sulfate 80 mg tablet in the mouth for too long prior to swallowing (91182). The ulceration was resolved after discontinuing iron supplementation. In another case report, a 76-year old male suffered gastric mucosal injury after taking a ferrous sulfate tablet daily for 4 years (56684). In a third case report, a 14-year-old female developed gastritis involving symptoms of upper digestive hemorrhage, nausea, melena, and stomach pain. The hemorrhage was attributed to supplementation with ferrous sulfate 2 hours after meals for the prior 2 weeks (96622). In one case report, a 43-year old female developed atrophic gastritis with non-bleeding ulcerations five days after starting oral ferrous sulfate 325 mg twice daily (110179).
Intravenously, iron can cause gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea and diarrhea(104684,110192,115894).
Hematologic ...Orally, iron supplements have been associated with hemochromatosis. In one case report, a 56-year-old female, negative for HFE mutation homozygosity, was diagnosed with acquired hemochromatosis after starting ferrous sulfate 325 mg twice daily 3 years prior, without follow-up care, for a previous iron deficiency secondary to alcoholic cirrhosis with esophageal varices and encephalopathy (113906).
Immunologic
...Although there is some clinical research associating iron supplementation with an increased rate of malaria infection (56796,95432), the strongest evidence to date does not support this association, at least for areas where antimalarial treatment is available (95433,96623).
In an analysis of 14 trials, iron supplementation was not associated with an increased risk of malaria (96623). In a sub-analysis of 7 preliminary clinical studies, the effect of iron supplementation was dependent upon the access to services for antimalarial treatment. In areas where anemia is common and services are available, iron supplementation is associated with a 9% reduced risk of clinical malaria. In an area where services are unavailable, iron supplementation was associated with a 16% increased risk in malaria incidence (96623). The difference in these findings is likely associated with the use of malaria prevention methods.
A meta-analysis of clinical studies of all patient populations shows that administering intravenous (IV) iron, usually iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose, increases the risk of infection by 16% when compared with oral iron or no iron. However, sub-analyses suggest this increased risk is limited to patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (110186). Additionally, a meta-analysis in adults with cancer-associated anemia shows that IV iron does not increase the risk of infection when compared with oral iron or no iron therapy (115892).
Intravenously, iron has rarely resulted in allergic reactions, including anaphylactoid reactions (110185,110192,112606,112607). There is one case of Kounis syndrome, also referred to as allergic angina or allergic myocardial infarction, in a 39-year-old female patient without previous coronary artery disease given IV ferric carboxymaltose. The patient experienced anaphylactic symptoms, including headache, abdominal pain, and breathing difficulties, 3 minutes after starting the infusion. She was further diagnosed with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (112607).
Musculoskeletal ...Intravenous (IV) iron may trigger hypophosphatemia in some patients, and cases of osteomalacia related to hypophosphatemia subsequent to parenteral iron administration have been rarely reported (112609,113905). In one case, a 70-year-old male with a genetic hemorrhagic disorder infused with ferric carboxymaltose developed lower limb pain with hypophosphatemia and diffuse bone demineralization in the feet (112609). In a second case, a 61-year-old male developed femoral neck insufficiency fractures following repeated ferric carboxymaltose transfusions for anemia related to vascular malformation in the bowel (112603).
Oncologic
...There is a debate regarding the association between high levels of iron stores and cancer.
Data are conflicting and inconclusive (1098,1099,1100,1102). Epidemiological studies suggest that increased body iron stores may increase the risk of cancer or general mortality (56703).
Occupational exposure to iron may be carcinogenic (56691). Oral exposure to iron may also be carcinogenic. Pooled analyses of population studies suggest that increasing the intake of heme iron increases the risk of colorectal cancer. For example, increasing heme iron intake by 1 mg/day is associated with an 11% increase in risk (56699,91185).
Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Orally, iron has been associated with rare reports of iron pill aspiration. This occurs when all or part of the pill is aspirated into the lungs. Once in the lungs, it can cause a chemical burn of the bronchial mucosa. Dozens of cases of iron pill aspiration have been reported in individuals ranging in age from 22 months to 92 years. Patients presented with cough, dyspnea, wheezing, and hemoptysis. The hemoptysis led to death in 2 patients due to hemorrhage. Long-term complication of fibrosis and bronchial stenosis was reported in a few of the cases. In one case, a 48-year-old female accidentally aspirated a ferrous sulfate tablet and presented to the emergency department with cough, blood-stained sputum, chest pain, dyspnea, and acute distress. Bronchoscopy was performed, parts of the pill were retrieved, and chemical burns and necrotic tissue were observed in the bronchus intermedius mucosa and throughout the middle and lower lobes. Debridement with bronchoalveolar lavage was performed. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit, placed on mechanical ventilation for 2 days, treated with corticosteroids, and discharged on the fifth day of hospitalization. Four weeks post-discharge the patient had significantly improved but still had some reduction in lung capacity.
Other ...Intravenously, sodium ferric gluconate complex (SFGC) caused drug intolerance reactions in 0. 4% of hemodialysis patients including 2 patients with pruritus and one patient each with anaphylactoid reaction, hypotension, chills, back pain, dyspnea/chest pain, facial flushing, rash and cutaneous symptoms of porphyria (56527).
General
...Orally, Lacticaseibacillus casei is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Mild gastrointestinal adverse effects.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is concern that lactobacilli may cause infections in some people.
Gastrointestinal ...Orally, taking Lacticaseibacillus casei in combination with other probiotics may cause gastrointestinal side effects including abdominal pain (90291); however, these events are uncommon.
Immunologic
...Since Lacticaseibacillus casei preparations contain live and active microorganisms, there is some concern that they might cause pathogenic infection in some patients.
Some lactobacilli species have been isolated in some cases of bacteremia, sepsis, splenic abscess, endocarditis, aortic dissection, necrotizing fasciitis, pancreatic necrosis, and meningoencephalitis. Most of these cases are thought to be due to the translocation of bacteria from other locations in the body in which they occur naturally, such as the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract. The majority of cases are not related to the use of probiotic supplements and most are not associated with the use of L. casei (107543,112516). There is at least one case of L. casei bacteremia and endocarditis thought to be related with L. casei intake in a 71-year-old immunocompromised female (112520).
There are two cases of L. casei infection in a prosthetic joint (90282,112514). In one case, the 95-year-old female with a history of hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease was known to consume yogurt containing L. casei. However, it was not confirmed that the infection was related to the consumption of this product. Spread from the gastrointestinal tract or vaginal flora could not be ruled out (90282). In the case of an 80-year-old male, the cause was unknown as there was no probiotic supplementation and no underlying medical condition or infectious portal of entry (112514).
A specific probiotic preparation (NBL probiotic ATP, Nobel) containing L. casei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, fructo-oligosaccharides, galacto-oligosaccharides, colostrum, and lactoferrin was found to be a significant risk factor for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus colonization in premature infants. Although there was no direct link to determine causation, it was hypothesized that the probiotic mixture helped to mediate the acquisition and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (96890).
General
...Orally and intravaginally, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Mild gastrointestinal adverse effects.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is concern that L. plantarum may cause infections in some people.
Gastrointestinal ...Orally, taking Lactiplantibacillus plantarum may cause gastrointestinal side effects including diarrhea, loose stools, nausea, stomach pain, rumbling, bloating, and flatulence (90271,107497,107556,107557,112064,111993); however, these events are uncommon.
Immunologic
...Since Lactiplantibacillus plantarum preparations contain live and active microorganisms, there is some concern that they might cause pathogenic infection in some patients.
Lactobacilli species, including L. plantarum, have been isolated in some cases of bacteremia, sepsis, splenic abscess, endocarditis, necrotizing fasciitis, pancreatic necrosis, and meningoencephalitis. Most cases of L. plantarum infection are thought to be due to the translocation of bacteria from other locations in the body in which they occur naturally, such as the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract (107543). However, there are also rare case reports of pathogenic infections possibly related to intake of L. plantarum supplements in these populations. In one case report, the diagnosis of L. plantarum bacteremia in a regular consumer of the fermented food Nukazuk was thought to be related to the eventual diagnosis of rectal cancer (107551).
A specific probiotic preparation (NBL probiotic ATP, Nobel) containing L. plantarum, Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, fructo-oligosaccharides, galacto-oligosaccharides, colostrum, and lactoferrin was found to be a significant risk factor for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus colonization in premature infants. Although there was no direct link to determine causation, it was hypothesized that the probiotic mixture helped to mediate the acquisition and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (96890).
Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, use of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 299v 10 billion colony-forming units daily has been associated with one case of transient vertigo in one clinical trial (90249).
General
...Orally and intravaginally, Lactobacillus acidophilus is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Mild gastrointestinal adverse effects.
Intravaginally: Vaginal discharge.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is concern that L. acidophilus may cause infections in some people.
Dermatologic ...Orally, in one clinical trial, a combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei F19, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lacltis BB-12 was associated with two cases of rash, one with itching. However, it is not clear if these adverse effects were due to L. acidophilus, other ingredients, the combination, or if the events were idiosyncratic (90236).
Gastrointestinal ...Orally, taking Lactobacillus acidophilus in combination with other probiotics may cause gastrointestinal side effects including epigastric discomfort (90239), abdominal pain (90239,90291,111785), dyspepsia (90239), flatulence (107497,107520), bloating (107497,111785), diarrhea (111785), vomiting (107537), and burping (90239); however, these events are uncommon.
Genitourinary ...Intravaginally, cream containing Lactobacillus acidophilus has been shown to cause increased vaginal discharge in about 5% of patients, compared to about 1% of patients receiving placebo cream (90237). Vaginal burning was reported by one person using intravaginal L. acidophilus and Limosilactobacillus fermentum in a clinical trial (111781).
Immunologic ...Since Lactobacillus acidophilus preparations contain live and active microorganisms, there is some concern that they might cause pathogenic infection in some patients. L. acidophilus has been isolated in some cases of bacteremia, sepsis, splenic abscess, liver abscess, endocarditis, necrotizing fasciitis, pancreatic necrosis, and meningoencephalitis. Most of these cases are thought to be due to the translocation of bacteria from other locations in the body in which they occur naturally, such as the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract (107543,111782,111792). L. acidophilus endophthalmitis has been reported rarely (111787,111795). In one case, it was related to intravitreal injections for age-related macular degeneration in a 90-year-old female with an intraocular lens (111787). In another, it occurred following cataract surgery (111795).
General
...Orally, pumpkin products are generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal discomfort, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Anaphylaxis.
Dermatologic ...There are two case reports of adult females developing substantial transient hair loss 1-3 weeks after consumption of a meal containing either bitter-tasting pumpkin or undefined squash. This adverse effect was attributed to a high concentration of cucurbitacin, which is commonly found in wild pumpkins (104535).
Gastrointestinal ...Orally, pumpkin seed oil has been reported to cause mild abdominal discomfort in clinical trials (5093,92378). There are also two case reports of adults developing severe nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea following consumption of a meal containing either bitter-tasting pumpkin or undefined squash. These adverse effects were attributed to a high concentration of cucurbitacin, which is commonly found in wild pumpkins (104535).
Immunologic
...Orally, pumpkin seed oil and pumpkin pulp have been reported to cause anaphylactic reactions in children and adults.
A case review highlights 4 cases of anaphylaxis in children (3 from pumpkin pulp, 1 from pumpkin seeds), and 7 cases in adults (1 from pumpkin flesh, 6 from pumpkin seeds). Symptoms of anaphylaxis include urticaria, angioedema of the lips or face, dyspnea, dysphagia, and oropharyngeal itching and swelling. A case report describes a 2-year-old male presenting with urticaria, swollen lips, and increased dyspnea 10 minutes after ingesting pumpkin seeds. The patient was found to have elevated allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) and a positive skin-prick test for pumpkin seeds. Symptoms resolved after treatment with epinephrine, systemic glucocorticoids, salbuterol, and antihistamines (107843).
There may also be concern for allergic reaction due to inhalation or topical exposure. One case report describes an 8-year-old child developing anaphylaxis while carving a pumpkin; another highlights that inhalation of pumpkin seed flour may have potentiated anaphylaxis in 3 individuals following the ingestion of pumpkin seeds (107843). Further research is necessary to assess the relationship between anaphylaxis and route of administration.
General ...Orally, quinoa seems to be well-tolerated. Rarely, quinoa can cause allergic reaction in some individuals, including anaphylaxis (99150,99151,96062).
Immunologic ...Orally, allergic reactions to quinoa have been reported (99150,96062). Anaphylaxis and pruritic reactions have occurred in at least two individuals, a 29-year-old female and a 52-year-old male. Quinoa allergy was confirmed in both patients via skin-prick testing with quinoa extract (99150,99151).
General
...Orally, topically, or intranasally, sesame seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
All routes of administration: Allergic reactions.
Dermatologic ...In a small clinical study, one patient using a cream containing sesame oil as well as aqueous extracts of guggul and Allium ampeloprasum complained of rash at the application site (105751). It is unclear if this reaction was due to sesame, other ingredients, or other factors.
Gastrointestinal ...There was a single case of diarrhea associated with oral sesame in a clinical trial (108356).
Immunologic
...Multiple cases of allergic response to sesame seed occurring after occupational, topical, intramuscular, or oral exposure have been reported (28157,28158,28159,28160,28161,28162,28163,28166,28167,28183)(28184,28185,28186,28188,108348).
One study found that up to 0.5% of the United States population reports having a sesame allergy, and 0.23% of the population meets criteria for an IgE-mediated allergic reaction to sesame (100501). Allergic symptoms may be dermatologic, such as angioedema (28160,28167,108348), cheilitis (28207), dermatitis (28157,28166,28182,28185,28186), edema (28159), erythema (28167), pruritis (28167,108348), purpura (28188), flushing (108348), and urticaria (28159,28160,28162,108348); musculoskeletal (28188); respiratory, such as asthma (28159,28162), rhinitis (28162), wheezing (28167), and general breathing difficulties (108348); gastrointestinal, such as vomiting (28159,108348); and others such as conjunctivitis (28159), anaphylactic shock (28157,28159,28160,28167,28177,28178,28179,28180,28204,108348), and hemodynamic modifications (28169). In Canada, sesame accounted for 4% of pediatric food-induced anaphylaxis reactions presenting to emergency departments over a 10-year period. The majority of cases were mild to moderate in severity and occurred within 2 hours of exposure; however, about 3% occurred 2-8 hours after exposure. Epinephrine was the most common treatment, followed by antihistamines, inhaled beta-agonists, and corticosteroids (108348).
Approximately one-third of patients with IgE-mediated sesame allergy have reported previous use of epinephrine due to this allergy (100501). There is evidence that IgE-mediated sesame allergy is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors; there was a high correlation of the allergy between family members, especially siblings (28175).
Allergens believed to be responsible for sesame seed hypersensitivity include beta-globulin (28213); sesamol, sesamolin, and sesamin (28182,28207); storage proteins including ses i 1 and ses i 2 (2S albumins) (28132,28187,28211,28212,28216,28217), ses i 3 (a 7S vicilin-type globulin) (28187,28214), ses i 4 (28158), ses i 5 (28158), ses i 6 (an 11S globulin) (28132,28215), and ses i 7 (28215). Typically allergens in sesame seeds that cause reactions after oral intake have molecular weights ranging from 8-62 kDa (28208,28210).
Pulmonary/Respiratory ...In clinical trials involving a sesame oil nasal spray, minor adverse effects included adverse smell, oil dripping from the nose, and nasal blockage (27659).
General ...Orally, no adverse effects have been reported; however, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
General
...Orally, stevia and steviol glycosides appear to be well tolerated.
Most minor adverse effects seem to resolve after the first week of use.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Abdominal bloating, dizziness, headache, myalgia, nausea, and numbness.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Allergic reactions.
Gastrointestinal ...Orally, stevia and steviol glycosides such as stevioside, can cause gastrointestinal adverse effects such as abdominal fullness and nausea. However, these generally resolve after the first week of use (11809,11810,113005).
Immunologic ...Theoretically, stevia might cause allergic reactions in individuals sensitive to plants in the Asteraceae/Compositae family (11811). Members of this family include ragweed, chrysanthemums, marigolds, daisies, and many other herbs.
Musculoskeletal ...Orally, stevia and steviol glycosides may cause myalgia, but this generally resolves after the first week of use (11809,11810).
Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, stevia and steviol glycosides may cause headache, dizziness, and numbness (11809,11810).
General
...Orally and topically, sunflower oil is well tolerated.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Allergic reactions in sensitive individuals have been reported.
Immunologic ...Orally, sunflower oil can cause an allergic reaction in individuals sensitive to the Asteraceae/Compositae family. Members of this family include ragweed, chrysanthemums, marigolds, daisies, and many other herbs. However, the protein content of sunflower oil is very low. In one case report, an allergic response to sunflower oil did not occur despite presenting with severe allergy and anaphylaxis to sunflower seed (108140).
