Australian Royal Jelly (1.1% 10-HDA) by CATALO

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Menopausal symptoms. Several clinical studies suggest that oral royal jelly, taken alone or in combination with other ingredients, modestly improves menopausal symptoms. It is unclear if topical royal jelly is beneficial for this use. Details: One clinical study in postmenopausal patients shows that taking royal jelly 1000 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces menopausal symptom scores by around 30% when compared with placebo (102527). Other small clinical studies show that taking one to two capsules of a specific combination product containing royal jelly and flower pollen (Melbrosia) daily for 12 weeks reduces menopausal symptoms and improves feelings of well-being when compared with baseline or placebo (18064,71956,72005). Another clinical trial in postmenopausal patients shows that taking two capsules of a specific combination product containing royal jelly, evening primrose oil, damiana, and ginseng (Lady 4) daily for 4 weeks decreases self-rated menopausal symptoms when compared with placebo (21003). Topical royal jelly has also been evaluated. A small clinical study in postmenopausal adults shows that applying vaginal cream containing royal jelly 15% daily for 12 weeks improves quality of life, sexual problems, and urinary problems similarly to vaginal estrogen cream 0.625 mg. However, estrogen cream improves vaginal atrophy better than royal jelly (92884).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Oral royal jelly does not appear to prevent or treat symptoms of allergic rhinitis in children. Details: A clinical trial in children 5-16 years of age with allergic rhinitis shows that taking a specific royal jelly product (Bidro) 150 mg twice daily for 3-6 months before and during pollen season does not prevent or treat nasal congestion, sneezing, or eye discomfort when compared with placebo (71968).
• Diabetes. Oral royal jelly does not appear to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Details: Most clinical research in patients with type 2 diabetes, along with a meta-analysis of five small clinical trials including patients with or without type 2 diabetes, shows that taking royal jelly 0.5-6 grams daily for 4-8 weeks does not improve markers of glycemic control such as fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (92879,92880,92881,102529).
• Physical performance. Oral royal jelly does not appear to improve physical performance in elderly nursing home residents. Details: A clinical trial in elderly nursing home residents shows that taking royal jelly 1.2 grams or 4.8 grams daily for one year does not improve hand grip strength, walking, or ability to stand on one leg when compared with placebo (95870).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Androgenic alopecia. Although there has been interest in using topical royal jelly for androgenic alopecia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of royal jelly for this purpose.
• Atherosclerosis. Although there has been interest in using oral royal jelly for atherosclerosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of royal jelly for this purpose.
• Athletic performance. Oral royal jelly has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Two small clinical trials in elite male swimmers and runners show that taking royal jelly 400 mg and coenzyme Q10 60 mg daily for 10 days does not improve high-intensity interval training performance when compared with placebo (109992,109993). These studies were small and may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Cancer-related fatigue. It is unclear if oral royal jelly is beneficial for improving cancer-related fatigue. Details: A small clinical study in patients with solid (nonhematologic) malignancies shows that taking 5 mL of processed honey and royal jelly twice daily for 4 weeks reduces fatigue when compared with 5 mL of honey alone (92877).
• Chemotherapy-induced acral erythema. It is unclear if oral royal jelly is beneficial for preventing acral erythema from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Details: One small clinical trial in patients receiving TKI therapy for renal cell carcinoma shows that taking royal jelly 900 mg four times daily for 3 months does not reduce the risk of acral erythema when compared with placebo (105773). However, this study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Chemotherapy-induced hepatotoxicity. It is unclear if oral royal jelly is beneficial for preventing hepatotoxicity from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Details: One small clinical trial in patients receiving TKI therapy for renal cell carcinoma shows that taking royal jelly 900 mg four times daily for 3 months does not reduce the risk of hepatotoxicity when compared with placebo (105773). However, this study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity. It is unclear if oral royal jelly is beneficial for preventing chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity. Details: A small clinical study in patients receiving two cycles of cisplatin therapy shows that taking royal jelly capsules daily may attenuate increases in serum creatinine and urea levels when compared with placebo. However, it is unclear if this effect is clinically significant; the increased levels that occurred in the placebo group were still within normal limits (95871). The validity of these results is also limited by the short study duration and lack of statistical comparison between groups. Another small clinical trial in patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy for renal cell carcinoma shows that taking royal jelly 900 mg four times daily for 3 months does not reduce the risk of kidney dysfunction when compared with placebo (105773). However, this study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Chemotherapy-related fatigue. It is unclear if oral royal jelly is beneficial for preventing fatigue from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Details: One small clinical trial in patients receiving TKI therapy for renal cell carcinoma shows that taking royal jelly 900 mg four times daily for 3 months reduces the frequency of chemotherapy-related fatigue when compared with placebo (105773,105774).
• Cognitive impairment. Oral royal jelly has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment shows that taking a specific combination product (Memo, Pharco Pharmaceuticals), which contains natural lyophilized royal jelly 750 mg, ginkgo leaf extract 120 mg, and Panax ginseng root extract 150 mg, daily for 4 weeks improves cognitive ability when compared with placebo (89712).
• Diabetic foot ulcers. Small clinical studies suggest that topical application of royal jelly plus panthenol may improve healing of diabetic foot ulcers. It is unclear if topical royal jelly alone is beneficial for this use. Details: One small clinical study shows that applying royal jelly 5% to a wound after conventional cleansing and debriding three times weekly for 3 months does not improve the healing of diabetic foot ulcers when compared with placebo (92882). However, other small clinical studies show that applying 1-3 grams of a specific combination ointment (Pedyphar) containing royal jelly and panthenol after conventional cleansing and debriding procedures twice weekly for up to 6 months may improve the healing of diabetic foot ulcers (71980,102526). In one of these studies, the rate of complete healing of life-threatening ulcers was 2.7-fold greater with this combination ointment when compared with panthenol alone (102526). Possible reasons for these discrepancies include the use of combination versus single ingredient ointments and the duration of treatment.
• Dry eye. It is unclear if oral royal jelly is beneficial in patients with dry eye. Details: A small clinical trial in Japanese patients with dry eye shows that taking enzyme-treated royal jelly 2.4 grams daily for 8 weeks does not improve tear stability or dry eye symptoms when compared with placebo (95869).
• Fractures. Although there has been interest in using oral royal jelly for healing of fractures, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of royal jelly for this purpose.
• Hepatitis. Although there has been interest in using oral royal jelly for hepatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of royal jelly for this purpose.
• Male infertility. Intravaginal application of royal jelly has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in couples experiencing infertility due to asthenozoospermia shows that applying a saline solution containing royal jelly 3 grams, Egyptian bee honey 100 grams, and bee bread 1 teaspoon intravaginally before or after intercourse, starting one day after menstruation and continuing for 2 weeks, can increase the rate of pregnancy when compared with intrauterine insemination (55131). It is unclear if this effect is due to royal jelly, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral royal jelly is beneficial for reducing body weight in patients who are overweight or obese. Details: One small clinical study in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking fresh royal jelly 1 gram daily for 8 weeks reduces body weight by around 2 kg and body mass index (BMI) by around 0.7 kg/m², as well as carbohydrate and total energy intake, when compared with placebo. However, the improvement is modest and may not be clinically significant (92878). Another small clinical study in overweight adults shows that taking royal jelly 1000 mg daily for 8 weeks does not reduce body weight, BMI, or appetite when compared with placebo (102528). However, this study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference in these outcomes.
• Oral mucositis. It is unclear if oral royal jelly is beneficial for preventing or treating oral mucositis in patients receiving radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Details: One small clinical trial in patients receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy shows that swishing and swallowing royal jelly 1 gram in two divided doses daily, in addition to standard rinses with benzydamine and nystatin, improves healing time of mild or moderate oral mucositis when compared with standard rinses alone (95867).
• Osteoporosis. It is unclear if oral royal jelly is beneficial in patients with osteoporosis. Details: A small clinical trial in postmenopausal adults shows that taking royal jelly powder 1000 mg, equivalent to 3000 mg of fresh royal jelly, daily for 6 months maintains bone mineral density (BMD) in the proximal femur and lumbar spine, while patients taking placebo saw significant reductions in lumbar spine BMD. Also, markers of bone turnover were significantly reduced with placebo, while significant changes in these markers were lacking in patients taking royal jelly (105775). It is unclear whether these findings can be generalized to patients with documented osteoporosis.
• Peptic ulcers. Although there has been interest in using oral royal jelly for peptic ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of royal jelly for this purpose.
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). It is unclear if oral royal jelly, taken alone or in combination with other ingredients, is beneficial in patients with PMS. Details: A small clinical study in healthy college students shows that taking royal jelly 1 gram daily starting on the first day of menstruation and continuing for two consecutive menstrual cycles improves PMS symptoms when compared with placebo (95873). However, methodological flaws associated with the study limit the validity of these results. A small clinical study shows that taking a specific combination product (Femal, Natumin Pharma), providing royal jelly 12 mg, bee pollen extract 72 mg, and bee pollen plus pistil extract 240 mg, twice daily over 2 menstrual cycles seems to decrease some symptoms of PMS including irritability, weight increases, and edema (12008). It is unclear if these effects are due to royal jelly, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Renal cell carcinoma. It is unclear if oral royal jelly is beneficial in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Details: One small clinical trial in patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for renal cell carcinoma shows that taking royal jelly 900 mg four times daily for 3 months reduces tumor size, improves chemotherapy-related fatigue and anorexia, and reduces the need for dose reduction or the discontinuation of therapy when compared with placebo (105773,105774). Royal jelly does not seem to reduce other TKI-related adverse effects, including gastrointestinal symptoms, oral mucositis, acral erythema, anemia, hepatotoxicity, or nephrotoxicity, when compared with placebo (105773). However, this study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference in these outcomes. More evidence is needed to rate royal jelly for these uses.

(Read more about ROYAL JELLY)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Cystic fibrosis. Long-term nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride improves lung function and reduces pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis show that, when taken along with a bronchodilator and other standard therapies, nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride in concentrations of 3% to 7%, up to 10 mL twice daily for 4 weeks, increases forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) when compared with isotonic saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) (26230,26230). This benefit was not seen at 48 weeks. Other clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis shows that inhaling sodium chloride 7%, 4 mL twice daily for 48 weeks, does not improve FEV1 when compared with isotonic saline. However, chronic treatment with hypertonic saline does reduce the number of pulmonary exacerbations and increase the number of patients without pulmonary exacerbations when compared with isotonic saline (29402). It is not clear if this benefit occurs in children with cystic fibrosis. The Pulmonary Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends that individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 6 years or older use nebulized hypertonic saline long-term to improve lung function, reduce the number of exacerbations, and improve quality of life (29403).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity. Oral sodium chloride seems to prevent nephrotoxicity associated with use of amphotericin B. Details: Clinical research shows that administering oral or intravenous sodium chloride 150 mEq daily during treatment with amphotericin B can attenuate the rise in serum creatinine levels and preserve renal function when compared to treatment with amphotericin B alone (26226).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in preventing lithium level fluctuations in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A moderate-sized open-label clinical study in adults with type I bipolar disorder receiving lithium carbonate shows that taking sodium chloride 1 gram daily for 12 weeks along with dietary salt restriction of 1 gram daily reduces the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L, but does not significantly affect serum sodium, potassium, aldosterone, or creatinine levels when compared with controls who were not salt restricted, but were advised not to consume additional salt at the table (112909). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by missing data in both groups.
• Canker sores. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for canker sores, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Congestive heart failure. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in patients with acute decompensated heart failure requiring decongestive therapy with diuretics. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure requiring high-dose intravenous furosemide shows that taking sodium chloride 2 grams three times daily for up to 96 hours does not affect patient weight or serum creatinine levels when compared with placebo (112911). However, the clinical relevance of this study is unclear and it may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Conjunctivitis. Although there is interest in using ophthalmic sodium chloride for conjunctivitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Hyponatremia. Although there is interest in using oral sodium chloride for hyponatremia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral sodium chloride for this condition.
• Pharyngitis. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for pharyngitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial for premature infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in infants born at less than 32 weeks' gestation shows that adding sodium 4 mEq/kg daily to enteral feedings, starting from the 7th day after birth and continuing through the 35th day, reduces the risk of developing hyponatremia and improves weight gain when compared with adding water (98180). A small, open-label clinical study in newborns less than 35 weeks gestation shows that high sodium intake, defined as an average of 0.25% sodium in maintenance fluids, for 48 hours on day 2 and 3 after birth results in less weight loss within the first 72 hours of life when compared with control, but does not improve mortality, length of hospital stay, or complications from prematurity (112908). However, interpretation of these findings is limited by varied concentrations of sodium as an intervention. More evidence is needed to rate sodium for these uses.

(Read more about SODIUM)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Royal jelly 1-4.8 grams daily for up to 1 year has been used in clinical research without reported adverse effects (95869,95870,102527,102528,105773,105774)....when used topically and appropriately for up to 6 months (71980,102526).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately for up to 6 months. A specific royal jelly product (Bidro) 150 mg twice daily has been used with apparent safety for 3-6 months in children 5-16 years of age (71968).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about ROYAL JELLY)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher doses can be safely used therapeutically with appropriate medical monitoring (26226,26227).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid exceeding the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension and increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (26229,98176,98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,100310,109395,109396,109398,109399). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sodium when used topically.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (26229,100310). Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid prolonged use of doses exceeding the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension (26229).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in higher doses. Higher intake can cause hypertension (100310). Also, both the highest and the lowest pre-pregnancy sodium quintile intakes are associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia, and the delivery of small for gestational age (SGA) infants when compared to the middle intake quintile (106264).

(Read more about SODIUM)

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, royal jelly might increase the risk of hypotension when taken with antihypertensive drugs.  Details Animal research suggests that royal jelly might lower blood pressure (71982,71963).

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Royal jelly might increase the risk of bleeding when taken with warfarin.  Details In one case, an 87-year-old male who was previously stabilized on warfarin developed hematuria and was found to have an INR of 7.29 after taking a royal jelly supplement for one week (14303).

(Read more about ROYAL JELLY)

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = A Theoretically, a high intake of dietary sodium might reduce the effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs.  Details High intake of dietary sodium can increase systolic and diastolic blood pressure (26222). Also, high intake of sodium may necessitate increased use of antihypertensive medications to achieve blood pressure control in some patients, such as those with chronic kidney disease (26223).

CORTICOSTEROIDS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids with sodium supplements might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids (corticosteroids) cause sodium retention. This effect is dose-related and depends on mineralocorticoid potency. It is most common with hydrocortisone, cortisone, and fludrocortisone, followed by prednisone and prednisolone (4425).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Altering dietary intake of sodium might alter the levels and clinical effects of lithium.  Details High sodium intake can reduce plasma concentrations of lithium by increasing lithium excretion (26225). Reducing sodium intake can significantly increase plasma concentrations of lithium and cause lithium toxicity in patients being treated with lithium carbonate (26224,26225). Stabilizing sodium intake is shown to reduce the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L (112909). Patients taking lithium should avoid significant alterations in their dietary intake of sodium.

SODIUM-CONTAINING DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of sodium-containing drugs with additional sodium from dietary or supplemental sources may increase the risk of hypernatremia and long-term sodium-related complications.  Details The Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams of sodium daily indicates the intake at which it is believed that chronic disease risk increases for the apparently healthy population (100310). Some medications contain high quantities of sodium. When used in conjunction with sodium supplements or high-sodium diets, the CDRR may be exceeded. Additionally, concomitant use may increase the risk for hypernatremia; this risk is highest in the elderly and people with other risk factors for electrolyte disturbances.

TOLVAPTAN (Samsca) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, concomitant use of tolvaptan with sodium might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Tolvaptan is a vasopressin receptor 2 antagonist that is used to increase sodium levels in patients with hyponatremia (29406). Patients taking tolvaptan should use caution with the use of sodium salts such as sodium chloride.

(Read more about SODIUM)

General ...Orally and topically, royal jelly seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Dyspnea, eczema, oral allergy syndrome, pruritus, and urticaria in people with a history of asthma or atopy.
Topically: Contact dermatitis and skin irritation.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Anaphylaxis, status asthmaticus, and death in people with a history of asthma or atopy.

Gastrointestinal ...There is one case report of hemorrhagic colitis with abdominal pain, bloody diarrhea with concomitant hemorrhagic and edematous mucosa of the sigmoid colon after ingestion of royal jelly. Symptoms resolved within 2 weeks following discontinuation of royal jelly and conservative treatment (3516).

Immunologic ...In people with a history of atopy or asthma, royal jelly taken orally appears to cause a high rate of allergic symptoms including pruritus, urticaria, eczema, eyelid and facial edema, conjunctivitis, rhinorrhea, dyspnea, oral allergy syndrome, and asthma (7314,7315,7316,10623,95872). In severe cases, royal jelly can cause status asthmaticus, anaphylaxis, and death (792,7315,7316,10623,10624,108511). Allergic symptoms are associated with IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions (3513,10623).
Topically, skin irritation, exacerbation of dermatitis, or contact dermatitis may occur (791).
From occupational exposure, royal jelly can cause allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma (95868).

Neurologic/CNS ...There is one report of dizziness in a patient who took a combination product containing royal jelly, bee pollen extract, and a bee pollen plus pistil extract (12008).

(Read more about ROYAL JELLY)

General ...Orally, sodium is well tolerated when used in moderation at intakes up to the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level. Topically, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Worsened cardiovascular disease, hypertension, kidney disease.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, intake of sodium above the CDRR intake level can exacerbate hypertension and hypertension-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) (26229,98176,100310,106263). A meta-analysis of observational research has found a linear association between increased sodium intake and increased hypertension risk (109398). Observational research has also found an association between increased sodium salt intake and increased risk of CVD, mortality, and cardiovascular mortality (98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,109395,109396,109399). However, the existing research is unable to confirm a causal relationship between sodium intake and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; high-quality, prospective research is needed to clarify this relationship (100312). As there is no known benefit with increased salt intake that would outweigh the potential increased risk of CVD, advise patients to limit salt intake to no more than the CDRR intake level (100310).
A reduction in sodium intake can lower systolic blood pressure by a small amount in most individuals, and diastolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension (100310,100311,106261). However, post hoc analysis of a small crossover clinical study in White patients suggests that 24-hour blood pressure variability is not affected by high-salt intake compared with low-salt intake (112910). Additionally, the available research is insufficient to confirm that a further reduction in sodium intake below the CDRR intake level will lower the risk for chronic disease (100310,100311). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that reducing sodium intake increases levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides, but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, by a small amount (106261).
It is unclear whether there are safety concerns when sodium is consumed in amounts lower than the adequate intake (AI) levels. Some observational research has found that the lowest levels of sodium intake might be associated with increased risk of death and cardiovascular events (98181,98183). However, this finding has been criticized because some of the studies used inaccurate measures of sodium intake, such as the Kawasaki formula (98177,98178,101259). Some observational research has found that sodium intake based on a single 24-hour urinary measurement is inversely correlated with all-cause mortality (106260). The National Academies Consensus Study Report states that there is insufficient evidence from observational studies to conclude that there are harmful effects from low sodium intake (100310).

Endocrine ...Orally, a meta-analysis of observational research has found that higher sodium intake is associated with an average increase in body mass index (BMI) of 1. 24 kg/m2 and an approximate 5 cm increase in waist circumference (98182). It has been hypothesized that the increase in BMI is related to an increased thirst, resulting in an increased intake of sugary beverages and/or consumption of foods that are high in salt and also high in fat and energy (98182). One large observational study has found that the highest sodium intake is not associated with overweight or obesity when compared to the lowest intake in adolescents aged 12-19 years when intake of energy and sugar-sweetened beverages are considered (106265). However, in children aged 6-11 years, usual sodium intake is positively associated with increased weight and central obesity independently of the intake of energy and/or sugar-sweetened beverages (106265).

Gastrointestinal ...In one case report, severe gastritis and a deep antral ulcer occurred in a patient who consumed 16 grams of sodium chloride in one sitting (25759). Chronic use of high to moderately high amounts of sodium chloride has been associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer (29405).

Musculoskeletal ...Observational research has found that low sodium levels can increase the risk for osteoporosis. One study has found that low plasma sodium levels are associated with an increased risk for osteoporosis. Low levels, which are typically caused by certain disease states or chronic medications, are associated with a more than 2-fold increased odds for osteoporosis and bone fractures (101260).
Conversely, in healthy males on forced bed rest, a high intake of sodium chloride (7.7 mEq/kg daily) seems to exacerbate disuse-induced bone and muscle loss (25760,25761).

Oncologic ...Population research has found that high or moderately high intake of sodium chloride is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer when compared with low sodium chloride intake (29405). Other population research in patients with gastric cancer has found that a high intake of sodium is associated with an approximate 65% increased risk of gastric cancer mortality when compared with a low intake. When zinc intake is taken into consideration, the increased risk of mortality only occurred in those with low zinc intake, but the risk was increased to approximately 2-fold in this sub-population (109400).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...In patients with hypertension, population research has found that sodium excretion is modestly and positively associated with having moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea. This association was not found in normotensive patients (106262).

Renal ...Increased sodium intake has been associated with impaired kidney function in healthy adults. This effect seems to be independent of blood pressure. Observational research has found that a high salt intake over approximately 5 years is associated with a 29% increased risk of developing impaired kidney function when compared with a lower salt intake. In this study, high salt intake was about 2-fold higher than low salt intake (101261).

(Read more about SODIUM)