Extra Propolis Extract by CATALO

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Diabetes. Oral propolis seems to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes; however, some conflicting evidence exists. Details: A meta-analysis of six clinical trials including 374 patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking propolis for 8 weeks to 6 months reduces glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.5% and fasting plasma glucose by 14 mg/dL when compared with placebo. However, significant improvements in insulin levels or measures of insulin resistance were lacking (102520). While this pooled analysis suggests that propolis is modestly effective for improving glycemic control, individual study results are mixed. Three of the trials in the analysis failed to demonstrate significant improvements in HbA1c or glucose levels; however, all of these studies were small and likely underpowered to detect meaningful improvements in glycemic control (102523,102524,102525). Other studies showed positive results, with reductions in HbA1c ranging from 0.9% to 1.1% and reductions in fasting plasma glucose ranging from 21 mg/dL to 26 mg/dL. The doses and durations of propolis therapy in these studies included 400 mg daily for 6 months (99173), 900 mg daily for 12 weeks (95883), and 500 mg three times daily for 8 weeks (102521).
• Herpes labialis (cold sores). Topical propolis ointment or cream, applied five times daily, may improve lesion healing and reduce symptoms in patients with cold sores. Details: One small clinical study in patients with cold sores shows that applying a specific propolis 3% ointment (Herstat or ColdSore-FX by Afexa), five times daily at the start of symptoms, reduces cold sore duration by about 3-4 days and may reduce cold sore-related pain when compared with placebo (17664,17665). Larger clinical studies in patients with cold sores in the papular or vesicular stages show that applying a lip cream containing a specific propolis extract (GH2002) 0.5% five times daily for 5-10 days reduces the time to complete encrustation/epithelialization by about 1 day and improves symptoms of pain, burning, itching, tension, and swelling when compared with acyclovir 5% cream (95875,102519).
• Oral mucositis. Most clinical research shows that oral propolis or propolis-containing mouthwash can reduce the risk for severe, chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Details: A meta-analysis of five clinical trials including 209 patients shows that using mouthwash containing propolis reduces the odds of severe chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis by 65% when compared with placebo in cancer patients (99171). Rinsing with 5-10 mL of a propolis mouth rinse for 1 minute three times daily, alone or in addition to chlorhexidine mouthwash and fluconazole for 7-14 days, improves mucositis and redness when compared to control in patients receiving chemotherapy (92793,95877). A small clinical study in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer also shows that taking tablets of propolis (Natur Farma S.A.S.) 80 mg two or three times daily for 3 weeks, in addition to rinsing with sodium bicarbonate solution, decreases the development of mucositis when compared with only rinsing with sodium bicarbonate solution (95882). However, at least one high quality clinical study shows that rinsing with 7 mL of a specific product (Faringel, Cadigroup) containing propolis extract 6% and other ingredients three times daily for 6 weeks does not prevent the development of mucositis due to chemotherapy when compared with placebo in patients with head and neck cancer (95879).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial for improving athletic performance. Details: A small clinical study in healthy male military cadets shows that taking propolis 450 mg twice daily for 4 weeks does not improve measures of aerobic or anaerobic performance during exercise testing when compared with placebo (108519).
• Atopic disease. It is unclear if oral propolis can prevent atopic disease in lactating adults or their infants. Details: A small clinical study in lactating adults shows that taking propolis 300 mg daily for 4-10 months does not appear to reduce the risk for developing atopic disease in either the mothers or their infants when compared with placebo (102518). However, due to the small sample size, this study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with breast cancer. Details: A small clinical study in patients with stage II or III breast cancer receiving chemotherapy shows that taking propolis 250 mg twice daily for 3 months improves quality of life and nutritional status when compared with placebo (108518). It is unknown if propolis can increase the likelihood of survival or remission in patients with breast cancer.
• Burns. It is unclear if topical propolis is beneficial in patients with minor burns. Details: One small clinical study in patients with minor burns shows that application of propolis cream to burn wounds every 3 days improves healing and reduces inflammation when compared with silver sulfadiazine. Propolis cream seems to be as effective for preventing infection as silver sulfadiazine in these patients (8663).
• Canker sores. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with canker sores. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with recurrent canker sores shows that taking propolis 500 mg daily for 6-13 months significantly reduces canker sore outbreaks and improves quality of life when compared with placebo. A 50% or greater reduction in cold sore outbreaks was reported in 60% and 11% of patients taking propolis or placebo, respectively (17629).
• Catheter-related infections. It is unclear if topical propolis is beneficial for the prevention of catheter-related infections. Details: One small clinical study in patients with peritoneal dialysis catheters shows that cleaning the exit site after dialysis with a normal saline wash and propolis 10% ointment for 6 months does not reduce the rate of catheter site infections when compared with using normal saline wash plus mupirocin 2% ointment or normal saline wash alone (109985).
• Chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with CKD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with CKD shows that taking Brazilian green propolis extract (EPP-AF) 250 mg twice daily for 12 months reduces proteinuria, but does not increase estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), when compared with placebo (105785).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Oral propolis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with frequent exacerbations of COPD shows that taking a combination of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) 1200 mg and propolis 160 mg orally once daily for 3 months reduces the incidence of acute exacerbations during 1 year of follow-up when compared with placebo or a lower dose combination of NAC 600mg and propolis 80 mg (109984). Further research shows that using the higher dose combination for 6 months reduces acute exacerbations, cough, and overall COPD severity, and increases dyspnea-free walking distance, when compared with placebo or the lower dose combination (109986).
• Common cold. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with the common cold. Details: One small clinical study in patients with rhinovirus infection shows that taking propolis (dose and duration unknown) might decrease the duration of cold symptoms 2.5-fold when compared with placebo (6602).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19. Details: A small observational study in healthcare professionals working in an emergency department shows that taking a 30% Anatolian propolis solution as 20 drops twice daily for one month reduces the occurrence of COVID-19 positivity to 2 of 102 subjects, compared with 14 of 102 in an untreated control group (109983). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of blinding and randomization. A small, open-label clinical study in hospitalized adults with COVID-19 shows that taking a standardized green propolis extract (EPP-AF) 100 mg or 200 mg four times daily for 7 days, along with conventional therapy, reduces length of hospital stay by around 5-6 days, but does not affect the need for supplemental oxygen, odds of intubation, or admission to the intensive care unit, when compared with conventional therapy alone (108514).
• Dengue fever. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with dengue fever. Details: A small clinical study in patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever shows that taking propolis extract (Propoelix) 400 mg three times daily for 7 days reduces the length of hospital stay by about 18 hours when compared with placebo. This was based on being deemed technically fit for discharge because of a recovery of platelet counts. The effect of propolis on other symptoms of dengue fever was not investigated in this study (99168).
• Dental caries. It is unclear if topical propolis, used either as a chewing gum or mouthwash, can prevent dental caries in children. Details: One small clinical trial in children 6-8 years of age at high risk of dental caries shows that chewing propolis gum twice daily for 20 minutes or rinsing with 10 mL of propolis 2% mouthwash for 1 minute twice daily for 2 weeks reduces plaque and Streptococcus mutans count when compared to baseline. There were no differences between the two propolis formulations; however, children preferred the chewing gum over the mouthwash (105790). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of control group.
• Denture stomatitis. Small clinical studies suggest that topical propolis may speed recovery in patients with denture stomatitis. Details: One very small clinical study in denture-bearing patients with prosthesis stomatitis candidiasis shows that applying Brazilian green propolis 20% ethanol extract topically four times daily for 7 days can cause regression of candidiasis lesions. After 7 days, 58% of patients treated with propolis and 67% of patients treated with nystatin had total lesion remission. After 15 days, all patients in both groups saw total lesion remission (70070). Also, two small clinical studies in patients with denture-induced oral mucositis show that applying propolis 2% to 3% gel (EPP-AF) to dentures three to four times daily for 7-14 days improves the cure rate and reduces erythema. In these studies, propolis appeared to be comparable to applying miconazole to dentures (95881,95884).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial as adjunct therapy in patients with depression. Details: A small clinical study in patients with moderate to severe depression inadequately managed with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) shows that taking propolis 1000 mg daily for 6 weeks, in addition to SSRI therapy, reduces symptoms of depression, as measured on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), when compared with placebo (108523).
• Diabetic foot ulcers. It is unclear if topical propolis is beneficial in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Details: A small clinical study in patients with diabetic foot ulcers shows that topical application of propolis 5% ointment in addition to routine care for 4 weeks reduces ulcer size about 2.5-fold more than routine care alone (99172).
• Genital herpes. It is unclear if topical propolis is beneficial in patients with genital herpes. Details: A small clinical study in patients with recurrent genital herpes caused by herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) shows that applying propolis 3% ointment (Herstat or ColdSore-FX by Afexa) four times daily for 10 days reduces healing time and increases the relative rate of complete healing by 1.7- and 2-fold when compared with acyclovir 5% ointment and placebo, respectively (1926).
• Gingivitis. Small clinical studies suggest that topical propolis may modestly improve symptoms in patients with gingivitis. Details: A small clinical study shows that rinsing with a propolis 2% solution 20 mL twice daily for 21 days is as effective as a rinse containing sodium fluoride 0.05% plus cetylpyridinium chloride 0.05% for the prevention of induced gingival redness and bleeding (99169). Another small clinical study in patients with gingivitis shows that rinsing with a propolis solution twice daily for 4 weeks reduces gingival bleeding, but does not improve plaque index, when compared with placebo (108513). Propolis has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. One small clinical study in patients with plaque-induced gingivitis shows that adjuvant therapy with a topical gel containing propolis and other ingredients (Oralsan NBF gel, IDS SpA) for 15 days following scaling and root planing is as effective as a chlorhexidine-based gel for improving bleeding, plaque, and probing depth (99170). Another small clinical study in patients with generalized or localized gingivitis or stage I periodontitis shows that taking 194 mg of a product containing propolis and mangosteen improves the modified gingival index by 31% or 40% at weeks 4 or 8, respectively, compared with 16% or 25% in those receiving placebo. No changes in probing depth, clinical attachment, plaque index, bleeding, or gingival recession were observed (106789).
• Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with H. pylori infection. Details: One very small, uncontrolled clinical study in patients with H. pylori infection shows that taking 60 drops of an alcoholic preparation of Brazilian green propolis daily for 7 days does not reduce H. pylori infection when compared to baseline (70107).
• HIV/AIDS. Although there has been interest in using oral propolis as an adjunct to antiretroviral therapy for HIV/AIDS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of propolis for this purpose.
• Intestinal parasite infection. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with giardiasis. Details: One small clinical study in adults with giardia infection shows that taking a specific propolis 30% extract (Propolisina, Apis Flora) for 5 days increases cure rates when compared with tinidazole. The cure rate was 60% with propolis extract, compared to only 40% with tinidazole. In children with giardiasis, taking propolis 10% extract showed a 52% cure rate; however, the rate of cure with tinidazole was not available (70121).
• Malnutrition. It is unclear if oral red propolis is beneficial in malnourished children with frequent respiratory tract infections. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 1-5 years with frequent respiratory tract infections and growth failure associated with malnutrition shows that giving 3% red propolis in 8 mL (10 grams) of honey once daily in addition to adequate nutrition does not improve weight gain or reduce the frequency of respiratory infections when compared with honey plus adequate nutrition (109987).
• Muscle fatigue. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial for speeding recovery from muscle fatigue. Details: One small study in young, healthy males shows that taking Brazilian green propolis 1575 mg before meals three times daily for one week, followed by exercise to induce muscle fatigue, reduces the time to regain maximal contraction torque after stopping when compared with placebo or a 100-mg dose of propolis. There was no difference in average peak power between the groups (109989).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with NAFLD. Details: One small clinical study in patients with NAFLD shows that taking propolis extract 250 mg twice daily for 4 months improves markers of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, but does not improve liver function, when compared with placebo (105786). Another small study in adults with obesity and NAFLD shows that taking propolis 510 mg daily for 8 weeks with a calorie-restricted diet reduces liver fibrosis, fasting blood glucose levels, serum insulin levels, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) when compared with placebo. However, it does not affect the severity of fatty liver, anthropometric measurements, lipid profile, or levels of inflammatory markers (109988).
• Peptic ulcers. Although there has been interest in using oral propolis for peptic ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of propolis for this purpose.
• Periodontitis. It is unclear if oral propolis or propolis extract rinse is beneficial in patients with periodontitis. Details: One small clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic periodontitis also receiving scaling and root planing shows that taking propolis 400 mg daily for 6 months reduces probing depth and improves clinical attachment by a small amount when compared with scaling and planing alone. There was no additional benefit with propolis on measures of gingivitis, plaque, or bleeding when compared with scaling and planing alone (99173). Another very small clinical study in patients with chronic periodontitis shows that irrigation of the gums with an ethanol solution containing propolis extract 20% twice weekly for 2 weeks reduces gum bleeding when compared with irrigation with ethanol 14% solution (95876). Propolis has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical study in patients with generalized or localized gingivitis or stage I periodontitis shows that taking 194 mg of a product containing propolis and mangosteen improves the modified gingival index by 31% or 40% at weeks 4 or 8, respectively, compared with 16% or 25% in those receiving placebo. No changes in probing depth, clinical attachment, plaque index, bleeding, or gingival recession were observed (106789).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with RA. Details: A small clinical study in females with RA shows that taking Brazilian propolis 508.5 mg daily for 24 weeks does not improve measures of disease activity, quality of life, or activities of daily living when compared with placebo (108515).
• Sepsis. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with sepsis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with pneumosepsis shows that taking propolis 1000 mg daily along with conventional therapy does not improve survival rates or disease severity, as measured using APACHE II and SOFA scores, when compared with placebo. The combination of propolis 1000 mg plus melatonin 20 mg daily did improve disease severity scores but had no effect on survival (108524).
• Tinea pedis. It is unclear if topical propolis is beneficial in patients with tinea pedis. Details: A case series involving students with athlete's foot found that topical treatment with a 100 mg/mL ethanolic extract of Brazilian green propolis results in less skin itching, peeling, and redness when compared with petroleum jelly placebo, but not when compared with miconazole (95880).
• Tuberculosis. Although there has been interest in using oral propolis for tuberculosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of propolis for this purpose.
• Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). It is unclear if oral propolis spray is beneficial in patients with URTI. Details: One small clinical study in patients reporting mild URTI symptoms shows that use of a propolis oral spray (M.E.D. Propolis, B Natural srl), 2-4 sprays daily, providing 6 mg of polyphenols per spray, for 5 days reduces the time to complete resolution of symptoms by 2 days when compared with placebo (105787). Propolis has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A large clinical study in children 1-5 years of age shows that taking 5-7.5 mL of a specific combination product (Chizukit, Hadas Corp Ltd.) containing propolis 50 mg/mL, echinacea extract 50 mg/mL, and vitamin C 10 mg/mL for 12 weeks reduces the number of children who experience one or more upper respiratory tract illnesses, as well as the number and duration of illnesses, when compared with placebo (48551). It is unclear if these findings are due to propolis, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Oral propolis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of 3 small clinical studies in adults with uncomplicated UTIs shows that taking combination products containing propolis, Hibiscus sabdariffa, and gelatin or xyloglucan daily for 5-10 days, then daily for two weeks each month for two months, reduces the odds of UTI recurrence by 87% when compared with control (108520). One of these studies used a specific product (Utipro Plus, Noventure) containing propolis 100 mg, xyloglucan extract 100 mg, Hibiscus sabdariffa extract 100 mg, and gelatin 50 mg once daily for 15 consecutive days each month for 6 months (101734). A small clinical study in females with recurrent UTIs shows that taking two capsules of a specific combination product (DUAB, Nutrivercell) containing propolis, cranberry, and zinc daily for 6 months reduces the number of recurrent UTIs by around 0.8 and delays the time to first recurrent UTI by around 26 days when compared with placebo (102522).
• Vaginitis. It is unclear if topical propolis is beneficial in patients with vaginitis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chronic vaginitis shows that applying 50 mL of a specific aqueous solution containing propolis 5% (Melprotect, Melbrosin International) to the vagina for 7 days can reduce symptoms and improve quality of life when compared to baseline (70068). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of control group.
• Warts. It is unclear if oral propolis is beneficial in patients with warts. Details: One small clinical study in adults and children with common and plane warts shows that taking propolis (Bee Propolis, Pollen) 500 mg orally daily for up to 3 months increases wart cure rates when compared with echinacea or placebo. Common warts were cured in 73% of patients taking propolis, compared to 20% taking echinacea and 8% taking placebo. Plane warts were cured in 75% of patients taking propolis, compared with 36% taking echinacea and 21% taking placebo. Neither propolis nor echinacea were effective for treating plantar warts (92800).
• Wound healing. It is unclear if topical propolis or propolis mouth rinse improves wound healing. Details: One small clinical study shows that using an aqueous alcohol mouth rinse containing propolis 5% five times daily for 1 week following sulcoplasty improves healing and reduces pain and inflammation (799). Another small clinical study in males recovering from surgery for sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease shows that using 1 mL of propolis 15% solution on the wound dressing daily for 28 days accelerates wound healing when compared with normal saline (108516) However, another small clinical trial in patients undergoing dental surgery shows that using a propolis 20% solution in a dressing is no more effective than the dressing alone for improving wound healing and reducing pain associated with the wound (99167). More evidence is needed to rate propolis for these uses.

(Read more about PROPOLIS)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Cystic fibrosis. Long-term nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride improves lung function and reduces pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis show that, when taken along with a bronchodilator and other standard therapies, nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride in concentrations of 3% to 7%, up to 10 mL twice daily for 4 weeks, increases forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) when compared with isotonic saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) (26230,26230). This benefit was not seen at 48 weeks. Other clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis shows that inhaling sodium chloride 7%, 4 mL twice daily for 48 weeks, does not improve FEV1 when compared with isotonic saline. However, chronic treatment with hypertonic saline does reduce the number of pulmonary exacerbations and increase the number of patients without pulmonary exacerbations when compared with isotonic saline (29402). It is not clear if this benefit occurs in children with cystic fibrosis. The Pulmonary Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends that individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 6 years or older use nebulized hypertonic saline long-term to improve lung function, reduce the number of exacerbations, and improve quality of life (29403).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity. Oral sodium chloride seems to prevent nephrotoxicity associated with use of amphotericin B. Details: Clinical research shows that administering oral or intravenous sodium chloride 150 mEq daily during treatment with amphotericin B can attenuate the rise in serum creatinine levels and preserve renal function when compared to treatment with amphotericin B alone (26226).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in preventing lithium level fluctuations in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A moderate-sized open-label clinical study in adults with type I bipolar disorder receiving lithium carbonate shows that taking sodium chloride 1 gram daily for 12 weeks along with dietary salt restriction of 1 gram daily reduces the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L, but does not significantly affect serum sodium, potassium, aldosterone, or creatinine levels when compared with controls who were not salt restricted, but were advised not to consume additional salt at the table (112909). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by missing data in both groups.
• Canker sores. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for canker sores, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Congestive heart failure. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in patients with acute decompensated heart failure requiring decongestive therapy with diuretics. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure requiring high-dose intravenous furosemide shows that taking sodium chloride 2 grams three times daily for up to 96 hours does not affect patient weight or serum creatinine levels when compared with placebo (112911). However, the clinical relevance of this study is unclear and it may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Conjunctivitis. Although there is interest in using ophthalmic sodium chloride for conjunctivitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Hyponatremia. Although there is interest in using oral sodium chloride for hyponatremia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral sodium chloride for this condition.
• Pharyngitis. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for pharyngitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial for premature infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in infants born at less than 32 weeks' gestation shows that adding sodium 4 mEq/kg daily to enteral feedings, starting from the 7th day after birth and continuing through the 35th day, reduces the risk of developing hyponatremia and improves weight gain when compared with adding water (98180). A small, open-label clinical study in newborns less than 35 weeks gestation shows that high sodium intake, defined as an average of 0.25% sodium in maintenance fluids, for 48 hours on day 2 and 3 after birth results in less weight loss within the first 72 hours of life when compared with control, but does not improve mortality, length of hospital stay, or complications from prematurity (112908). However, interpretation of these findings is limited by varied concentrations of sodium as an intervention. More evidence is needed to rate sodium for these uses.

(Read more about SODIUM)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Propolis has been used with apparent safety in clinical research at doses of up to 1500 mg daily (95883,99173,102520,102521). ...when used topically. Propolis as a 3% or 10% ointment, 0.5% cream, 30% mouth rinse, or 15% solution has been used with apparent safety in small clinical studies (799,1926,6602,8663,17629,17664,17665,92793,92800,95882)(99171,99173,102519,102521,105785,105786,108516,108523,109985).

PREGNANCY:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately during lactation. Propolis 300 mg daily has been used for 4-10 months in one clinical study with no apparent adverse effects to nursing infants (102518).

(Read more about PROPOLIS)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher doses can be safely used therapeutically with appropriate medical monitoring (26226,26227).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid exceeding the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension and increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (26229,98176,98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,100310,109395,109396,109398,109399). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sodium when used topically.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (26229,100310). Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid prolonged use of doses exceeding the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension (26229).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in higher doses. Higher intake can cause hypertension (100310). Also, both the highest and the lowest pre-pregnancy sodium quintile intakes are associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia, and the delivery of small for gestational age (SGA) infants when compared to the middle intake quintile (106264).

(Read more about SODIUM)

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, propolis might increase the risk of bleeding when taken with antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs.  Details In vitro research shows that propolis water extract and the propolis constituent, caffeic acid phenethyl ester, can inhibit platelet aggregation (50794,95885). Additionally, evidence from an animal model shows that taking propolis in addition to warfarin decreases INR, suggesting that propolis can decrease the effectiveness of warfarin (95874).

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, high doses of propolis might increase blood levels of drugs metabolized by CYP1A2.  Details In vitro research shows that propolis extract can inhibit CYP1A2 (92797,92799). However, animal research shows that propolis extract does not significantly affect CYP1A2 activity when administered to rats at doses up to 250 mg/kg. It is postulated that the constituents of propolis that inhibit CYP1A2 in vitro do not have significant effects in vivo due to low bioavailability and hepatic first-pass effect (92797). This effect has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, high doses of propolis might increase blood levels of drugs metabolized by CYP2C19.  Details In vitro research shows that propolis extract can inhibit CYP2C19 (92797,92799). However, animal research shows that propolis extract does not significantly affect CYP2C19 activity when administered to rats at doses up to 250 mg/kg. It is postulated that the constituents of propolis that inhibit CYP2C19 in vitro do not have significant effects in vivo due to low bioavailability and hepatic first-pass effect (92797). This effect has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, high doses of propolis might increase blood levels of drugs metabolized by CYP2C9.  Details In vitro research shows that propolis extract can inhibit CYP2C9 (92797,92799). However, animal research shows that propolis extract does not significantly affect CYP2C9 activity when administered to rats at doses up to 250 mg/kg. It is postulated that the constituents of propolis that inhibit CYP2C9 in vitro do not have significant effects in vivo due to low bioavailability and hepatic first-pass effect (92797). This effect has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, high doses of propolis might increase blood levels of drugs metabolized by CYP2D6.  Details In vitro research shows that propolis extract can inhibit CYP2D6 (92797,92799). However, animal research shows that propolis extract does not significantly affect CYP2D6 activity when administered to rats at doses up to 250 mg/kg. It is postulated that the constituents of propolis that inhibit CYP2D6 in vitro do not have significant effects in vivo due to low bioavailability and hepatic first-pass effect (92797). This effect has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, propolis might increase levels of drugs metabolized by CYP2E1.  Details In vitro research shows that propolis can inhibit CYP2E1 (92799). This effect has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, high doses of propolis might increase blood levels of drugs metabolized by CYP3A4.  Details Some in vitro research shows that propolis extract can inhibit CYP3A4 (92797); however, other in vitro research shows that propolis has no effect on CYP3A4 activity (92799). Furthermore, animal research shows that propolis extract does not significantly affect CYP3A4 activity when administered to rats at doses up to 250 mg/kg. It is postulated that the constituents of propolis that might in inhibit CYP3A4 in vitro do not have significant effects in vivo due to low bioavailability and hepatic first-pass effect (92797). This effect has not been reported in humans.

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, propolis might decrease the effectiveness of warfarin.  Details Animal research shows that taking propolis in addition to warfarin decreases the international normalized ratio (INR) (95874). This effect has not been reported in humans.

(Read more about PROPOLIS)

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = A Theoretically, a high intake of dietary sodium might reduce the effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs.  Details High intake of dietary sodium can increase systolic and diastolic blood pressure (26222). Also, high intake of sodium may necessitate increased use of antihypertensive medications to achieve blood pressure control in some patients, such as those with chronic kidney disease (26223).

CORTICOSTEROIDS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids with sodium supplements might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids (corticosteroids) cause sodium retention. This effect is dose-related and depends on mineralocorticoid potency. It is most common with hydrocortisone, cortisone, and fludrocortisone, followed by prednisone and prednisolone (4425).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Altering dietary intake of sodium might alter the levels and clinical effects of lithium.  Details High sodium intake can reduce plasma concentrations of lithium by increasing lithium excretion (26225). Reducing sodium intake can significantly increase plasma concentrations of lithium and cause lithium toxicity in patients being treated with lithium carbonate (26224,26225). Stabilizing sodium intake is shown to reduce the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L (112909). Patients taking lithium should avoid significant alterations in their dietary intake of sodium.

SODIUM-CONTAINING DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of sodium-containing drugs with additional sodium from dietary or supplemental sources may increase the risk of hypernatremia and long-term sodium-related complications.  Details The Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams of sodium daily indicates the intake at which it is believed that chronic disease risk increases for the apparently healthy population (100310). Some medications contain high quantities of sodium. When used in conjunction with sodium supplements or high-sodium diets, the CDRR may be exceeded. Additionally, concomitant use may increase the risk for hypernatremia; this risk is highest in the elderly and people with other risk factors for electrolyte disturbances.

TOLVAPTAN (Samsca) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, concomitant use of tolvaptan with sodium might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Tolvaptan is a vasopressin receptor 2 antagonist that is used to increase sodium levels in patients with hyponatremia (29406). Patients taking tolvaptan should use caution with the use of sodium salts such as sodium chloride.

(Read more about SODIUM)

General ...Orally and topically, propolis seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Headache.
Topically: Contact cheilitis and contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Severe allergic reactions in sensitive individuals.

Dermatologic ...Propolis can cause allergic reactions and acute oral mucositis with ulceration from the use of the propolis-containing lozenges (2632).
Topically, propolis-containing products, including some cosmetics, can cause eczematous contact dermatitis, erythema multiforme-like contact dermatitis, or allergic contact cheilitis (2632,15647,92796,92798,95878,95882,102517).
Patients allergic to bees or bee products may be more likely to experience allergic reactions to propolis.

Genitourinary ...Vulvar eczema caused by propolis sensitization after topical therapy has been reported (70067).

Hepatic ...Orally, propolis may cause an increase in liver enzymes when used long-term at high doses. In one case, a 30-year-old male presented with persistent abnormal liver enzymes for six months. With other causes ruled out, the patient disclosed using more than 10 propolis lozenges per day for several months to treat a sore throat. Upon discontinuation of the propolis lozenges, liver enzymes returned to normal (105788). Despite concerns presented in this case, analyses of small clinical studies suggest that propolis may have hepatoprotective effects when used at doses of 500-1000 mg daily for up to one year (108521,108522).

Immunologic ...In one case report, a 36-year-old female developed severe erythematous papules and patches with edema of the face, neck, arms, abdomen, and thighs after consuming propolis solution for a few weeks. After symptom resolution, a patch test showed an extreme positive reaction to propolis (106443). In another case, laryngeal edema and severe anaphylactic reaction has been reported in a patient who used topical propolis for the treatment of acute pharyngitis. The patient died due to complications of hypoxia that resulted from the allergic reaction (70063).
Topically, propolis-containing products can cause allergic contact dermatitis, including cheilitis, when used on or near the lips or mouth (15647,92796,92798,102517). Propolis-containing lozenges can cause allergic reactions as well as acute oral mucositis with ulceration (2632).
Patients allergic to bees or bee products may be more likely to experience allergic reactions to propolis.

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, propolis may cause headache in some patients. In one clinical trial, around 7% of patients taking propolis 250 mg twice daily for 4 months reported mild headache (105786).

Renal ...In one case report, a 59-year-old male with cholangiocarcinoma developed acute kidney failure requiring hemodialysis after taking a Brazilian preparation of propolis 5 mL three times daily for 2 weeks. Renal function improved when propolis was discontinued. The patient restarted taking propolis and symptoms developed again and the patient again required hemodialysis. Symptoms of renal failure improved when propolis was finally discontinued. This product was not screened for contaminants; however, family members of this patient used the same product without apparent adverse effects (14300).

(Read more about PROPOLIS)

General ...Orally, sodium is well tolerated when used in moderation at intakes up to the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level. Topically, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Worsened cardiovascular disease, hypertension, kidney disease.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, intake of sodium above the CDRR intake level can exacerbate hypertension and hypertension-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) (26229,98176,100310,106263). A meta-analysis of observational research has found a linear association between increased sodium intake and increased hypertension risk (109398). Observational research has also found an association between increased sodium salt intake and increased risk of CVD, mortality, and cardiovascular mortality (98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,109395,109396,109399). However, the existing research is unable to confirm a causal relationship between sodium intake and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; high-quality, prospective research is needed to clarify this relationship (100312). As there is no known benefit with increased salt intake that would outweigh the potential increased risk of CVD, advise patients to limit salt intake to no more than the CDRR intake level (100310).
A reduction in sodium intake can lower systolic blood pressure by a small amount in most individuals, and diastolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension (100310,100311,106261). However, post hoc analysis of a small crossover clinical study in White patients suggests that 24-hour blood pressure variability is not affected by high-salt intake compared with low-salt intake (112910). Additionally, the available research is insufficient to confirm that a further reduction in sodium intake below the CDRR intake level will lower the risk for chronic disease (100310,100311). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that reducing sodium intake increases levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides, but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, by a small amount (106261).
It is unclear whether there are safety concerns when sodium is consumed in amounts lower than the adequate intake (AI) levels. Some observational research has found that the lowest levels of sodium intake might be associated with increased risk of death and cardiovascular events (98181,98183). However, this finding has been criticized because some of the studies used inaccurate measures of sodium intake, such as the Kawasaki formula (98177,98178,101259). Some observational research has found that sodium intake based on a single 24-hour urinary measurement is inversely correlated with all-cause mortality (106260). The National Academies Consensus Study Report states that there is insufficient evidence from observational studies to conclude that there are harmful effects from low sodium intake (100310).

Endocrine ...Orally, a meta-analysis of observational research has found that higher sodium intake is associated with an average increase in body mass index (BMI) of 1. 24 kg/m2 and an approximate 5 cm increase in waist circumference (98182). It has been hypothesized that the increase in BMI is related to an increased thirst, resulting in an increased intake of sugary beverages and/or consumption of foods that are high in salt and also high in fat and energy (98182). One large observational study has found that the highest sodium intake is not associated with overweight or obesity when compared to the lowest intake in adolescents aged 12-19 years when intake of energy and sugar-sweetened beverages are considered (106265). However, in children aged 6-11 years, usual sodium intake is positively associated with increased weight and central obesity independently of the intake of energy and/or sugar-sweetened beverages (106265).

Gastrointestinal ...In one case report, severe gastritis and a deep antral ulcer occurred in a patient who consumed 16 grams of sodium chloride in one sitting (25759). Chronic use of high to moderately high amounts of sodium chloride has been associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer (29405).

Musculoskeletal ...Observational research has found that low sodium levels can increase the risk for osteoporosis. One study has found that low plasma sodium levels are associated with an increased risk for osteoporosis. Low levels, which are typically caused by certain disease states or chronic medications, are associated with a more than 2-fold increased odds for osteoporosis and bone fractures (101260).
Conversely, in healthy males on forced bed rest, a high intake of sodium chloride (7.7 mEq/kg daily) seems to exacerbate disuse-induced bone and muscle loss (25760,25761).

Oncologic ...Population research has found that high or moderately high intake of sodium chloride is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer when compared with low sodium chloride intake (29405). Other population research in patients with gastric cancer has found that a high intake of sodium is associated with an approximate 65% increased risk of gastric cancer mortality when compared with a low intake. When zinc intake is taken into consideration, the increased risk of mortality only occurred in those with low zinc intake, but the risk was increased to approximately 2-fold in this sub-population (109400).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...In patients with hypertension, population research has found that sodium excretion is modestly and positively associated with having moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea. This association was not found in normotensive patients (106262).

Renal ...Increased sodium intake has been associated with impaired kidney function in healthy adults. This effect seems to be independent of blood pressure. Observational research has found that a high salt intake over approximately 5 years is associated with a 29% increased risk of developing impaired kidney function when compared with a lower salt intake. In this study, high salt intake was about 2-fold higher than low salt intake (101261).

(Read more about SODIUM)