Soy Isoflavones by The Vitamin Shoppe

EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Oral calcium carbonate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an antacid. Details: Taking calcium carbonate orally as an antacid is effective for treating dyspepsia (1843). Calcium carbonate has FDA approval as an antacid.
• Hyperkalemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities. Details: Administering calcium gluconate intravenously can reverse electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias induced by hyperkalemia (12946). Intravenous calcium gluconate is FDA-approved for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities.
• Hypocalcemia. Oral calcium treats and prevents hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium is used to treat severe hypocalcemia. Details: Taking calcium orally is effective for treating and preventing hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate, acetate, gluceptate, or chloride is effective for severe hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany (12928).
• Kidney failure. Oral calcium carbonate or calcium acetate is used as a phosphate binder during kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium carbonate or calcium acetate orally is effective as a phosphate binder. Calcium acetate (PhosLo) appears to control hyperphosphatemia better than sevelamer (Renagel) (12943,12944,38990). Calcium citrate is not recommended for this purpose because it increases aluminum absorption and does not bind phosphate as efficiently as calcium acetate or calcium carbonate (21631). Some clinical research also shows that taking calcium orally reduces blood pressure in patients with kidney failure (975).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral calcium in combination with vitamin D prevents bone density loss that occurs during long-term treatment with corticosteroids. Details: Taking calcium in combination with vitamin D as adjunctive therapy seems to be effective for reducing bone mineral density loss in people using corticosteroids long-term (982,1046,1830,1831,1832,4462,4463,4464,4465,4466)(4467,12945,38493). One specific product used in clinical research is Oscal (Marion Merrel Dow Inc.), which contains elemental calcium 500 mg per tablet plus vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (982). Another product used is Oscal 250 + D (SmithKline Beecham Healthcare), which contains elemental calcium 250 mg and vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (1046).
• Hyperparathyroidism. Oral calcium reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium orally reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with kidney failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism (1827,1828,1829,39174,39425). In elderly women, the combination of calcium and vitamin D reverses secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces hip fracture risk (8818). Also, population research suggests increased calcium intake from the diet and supplements reduces the risk of primary hyperparathyroidism in women. Supplemental intakes of at least 500 mg/day and dietary intakes of approximately 1100 mg/day are considered to be protective (91353).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate calcium intake, from the diet and/or supplements, is recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate calcium intake in line with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) by age, along with adequate vitamin D intake, for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake when adequate dietary intake is not feasible (109425). In the US and Canada, foods containing at least 200 mg calcium with less phosphorous content than calcium can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate calcium intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (11940,102148). However, calcium supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Also, calcium supplements do not seem to be effective for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) during lactation (988), in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation (1817), or in patients who have had renal transplantation (4823,38736,38871). Maximal bone growth occurs in the teenage years, and then BMD in females remains relatively constant until age 30-40. After age 40, bone loss typically occurs at rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. In males, this occurs several decades later. Bone loss is more pronounced if dietary calcium intake is below the RDA, which is the case for many Americans (2571,2578). One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy children 7-14 years old shows that fortifying food with calcium 250-1000 mg daily for up to 24 months modestly improves femoral neck BMD, but not hip or spine BMD. However, the included trials did not supplement vitamin D (107232). During the 5 years immediately after menopause, calcium supplementation has very little effect on bone loss (2569,2570,2575,2576). The rapid loss of estrogen causes a high bone resorption rate, which increases serum calcium levels and therefore decreases intestinal absorption of calcium (2570). After this period, the typical rate of bone loss is 2% per year (2572,2576). Taking calcium 1000-1600 mg daily as carbonate, citrate, lactate gluconate, or citrate malate salt decreases this rate by 0.25% to 1% annually (977,979,981,2569,2571,2572,2575,2576,2578,6850)(38978,38980,39064). The greatest reductions (1% or more) are seen in the first 1-2 years of supplementation when bone remodeling foci can be filled (2569,2576). After this period, the differences in rate of loss between supplemented and non-supplemented females are closer to 0.25% per year (2569,2577). A meta-analysis of clinical evidence suggests that there is no additional benefit after 4 years (38980). Small clinical studies have found that continuous calcium supplementation at an average daily dose of 1050 mg, started after menopause and continued for 1.5-4 years, may reduce fracture rates by 26% when compared with no calcium supplementation. The largest of these studies was conducted in nursing home residents who also received daily vitamin D; the benefits of calcium, specifically, are unclear (39386). Some research also suggests that calcium and vitamin D improves primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in some older individuals with osteoporosis, particularly the elderly and those who are no longer community dwelling (12930,38875,38849,39026,109471). However, not all research is positive. One large clinical trial in elderly adults with a low-trauma fracture show that taking calcium 1000 mg daily with or without vitamin D 800 IU daily for 2-7 years does not reduce the risk of a second fracture when compared with placebo (13073). Another clinical study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 800 IU daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (less than 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). Also, some exploratory research suggests that supplements may need to be continued indefinitely; in adults over 68 years of age, any effects of 2 years of calcium supplements on BMD appear to be lost within 2 years after discontinuing supplements (6853). Calcium has additive effects when used with other agents such as vitamin D, estrogens, or calcitonin. Whereas calcium alone generally reduces or prevents loss of BMD, combination with other agents can produce small increases in BMD ranging from 0.3% to 3.3% depending on the combination and dosages used (978,980,1836,2570,2571,2572,2576). However, one meta-analysis in healthy adults shows that fortifying foods with calcium 250-1000 mg daily, in conjunction with vitamin D supplementation, for up to 24 months does not improve BMD when compared with control (107232). The full potential of osteoporosis treatments cannot be realized without adequate calcium intake (2569,2570,2571,2572). Advise patients taking agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene (Evista) to ensure that their daily calcium intake meets the RDA. Use supplements if necessary. The usefulness of calcium in preventing osteoporosis in males is not as well-studied. Some observational research has found that calcium 870 mg daily is not associated with changes in BMD and bone loss in males (97201). However, clinical evidence suggests that taking calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years might improve trabecular or cortical bone mass by 2% to 4% (980,8827,8873). Dietary supplementation with calcium and vitamin D seems to moderately reduce bone loss measured in the femoral neck, spine, and total body, and seems to reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in older patients with osteopenia or low BMD (980).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Adequate calcium intake seems to prevent symptoms of PMS. Details: There seems to be a link between low dietary calcium intake and symptoms of PMS (2004,6847,39007). Taking calcium 1000-1336 mg daily seems to significantly reduce depressed mood, water retention, and pain, especially if daily calcium intake is inadequate (1822,1823,1824,2004,95821). Calcium carbonate 1200 mg daily seems to decrease PMS symptom scores by about 18% when compared with placebo (1822). Increasing dietary calcium intake is also associated with a decreased risk of developing PMS. Consuming an average of 1283 mg of calcium per day from foods is associated with about a 30% lower risk of developing PMS compared with consuming an average of 529 mg daily (13094); however, taking calcium supplements does not appear to be associated with the risk of developing PMS.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Oral calcium seems to be beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer, especially in those with adequate vitamin D levels and normal body mass index (BMI). Details: Population studies have found that increased intake of dietary or supplemental calcium is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas (1047,8820,12120,38951,98898,98899). Clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research also show that taking calcium supplements 1.2-2 grams daily for up to 4 years can reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence by up to 29% (970,12118,12950,15267,34596,38718,39042,95817). However, not all research has been positive. Some meta-analyses of clinical research or observational studies suggest that taking calcium does not reduce the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer (34596,39042,39349). Other contradictory research suggests that postmenopausal females who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290); however, this finding may not be reliable due to the high baseline intake of calcium in study participants. The reason for these conflicting findings is not entirely clear. Vitamin D might be an important factor. People with lower than average vitamin D levels do not seem to get any benefit from calcium supplements (12118). Also, one meta-analysis of previous trials suggests that taking calcium 1200 mg daily reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas in people with a normal BMI, but not in those who are overweight or obese (99715). Despite this conflicting evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2005 stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence to support this claim (102366).
• Fetal bone mineralization. If calcium intakes are low during pregnancy, oral calcium seems to be beneficial for increasing fetal bone density. Details: With low dietary calcium intake (less than 562 mg elemental calcium daily) during pregnancy, calcium supplementation increases fetal bone mineralization and density. However, calcium supplementation does not offer any additional benefit if calcium intakes are adequate (3263,3264).
• Hypertension. Oral calcium seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount. However, it is unclear if this reduction is clinically significant. Details: Many clinical trials and observational studies show that intake of calcium supplements or dietary calcium modestly reduces blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension, usually around 1-2 mmHg. Calcium seems to be more effective for certain subpopulations of patients, such as salt-sensitive people and patients with low baseline dietary calcium intake (945,972,974,976,984,1818,1819,1820,1821,6852)(13138,14406,38803,39063,39094,39221). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium intake during pregnancy reduces systolic blood pressure in offspring by 1-2 mmHg (38852). However, a large-scale clinical trial in postmenopausal females shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg daily does not lower blood pressure or reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials shows that taking calcium in combination with vitamin D for up to 7 years has no effect on blood pressure (98861). The validity of this finding is limited by the poor methodological quality of the included studies. Some observational research suggests that calcium can reduce the risk for hypertension. Population research in females aged 45 years and older suggests that higher intake of calcium from both diet and supplement sources is linked to a lower risk of developing hypertension when compared to lower calcium intake (14265). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension. However, the FDA has concluded that this claim is based on supporting, rather than conclusive, evidence (102367).
• Osteomalacia. Oral calcium seems to reverse osteomalacia caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Osteomalacia is commonly caused by vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to osteomalacia in children and adults. Calcium supplementation can reverse osteomalacia caused by calcium deficiency. Along with appropriate vitamin D supplementation, individuals at risk of osteomalacia need sufficient calcium intake (94819).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral calcium seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia in high risk pregnancies, especially if calcium intakes are low. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (971,38756), most clinical research shows that taking calcium orally 1-2 grams daily reduces pregnancy-related hypertension and pre-eclampsia (973,1833,8828,39043,39319,39426,96480). Calcium appears to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia by about 50% when compared with placebo. One meta-analysis of 19 controlled trials involving over 29,000 pregnancies found that for every 19 females treated with calcium, one episode of pre-eclampsia would be avoided (96480). Calcium appears to have the greatest effect in individuals at high-risk of pre-eclampsia or with low calcium levels, and when taken at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation (15029,38497,96480,99714). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding the use of calcium supplements to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. However, due to the limited and conflicting research available at that time, the FDA stated that this outcome was highly unlikely. Since then, large, high-quality clinical research has supported this finding. In fact, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released a recommendation to prescribe oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancies at high risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary calcium intakes are low, in order to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).
• Rickets. Oral calcium seems to reverse rickets caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Rickets is commonly caused be vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to rickets. Calcium supplementation can reverse rickets caused by calcium deficiency (94819). A small clinical study in children with nutritional rickets shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily for 24 weeks improves radiographically measured rickets caused by calcium deficiency. Rickets seems to improve more rapidly with calcium 1000 mg compared to calcium 500 mg. However, increasing the calcium dose to 2000 mg daily is not more beneficial than calcium 1000 mg daily (98904).
• Tooth retention. Oral calcium with vitamin D seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral calcium does not seem to be beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Although some population research disagrees (15631,39041,95811,107237), most research shows that increased calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (15631,16715,98895,107236,107237). Subgroup analyses of population research suggest that calcium intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, adults (15631,107237). Another subgroup analysis in a large meta-analysis of population research also suggests that dietary intake may reduce estrogen receptor(ER)-negative breast cancer, but not ER-positive breast cancer (107236). However, most other research has not evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation or intake on breast cancer subtypes. The best evidence to date, from a large scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years after menopause does not reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer at the end of the study and 5 years after the end of the intervention (16715,98895).
• Fractures. Although oral calcium prevents fractures in osteoporosis, most evidence shows that calcium does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis discussion for more information on the use of calcium for this purpose. Details: The most recent and robust meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium supplementation with or without vitamin D is NOT associated with reduced fractures in older adults without osteoporosis (95822). A large-scale study in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years suggests calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D 400 IU daily for 7 years only modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) and does not significantly reduce fracture risk. This lack of effect may have been due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. In those who were 80% adherent, the combination of calcium plus vitamin D reduced the risk of hip fracture by about 29% (14282). Also, some clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 5 years does not attenuate loss of height after menopause when compared with placebo (95810). Additional meta-analyses of clinical and observational evidence suggest that calcium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, such as hip fractures (38589,38888,98895). Some other research has suggested that calcium in combination with vitamin D reduces fracture risk in older patients without osteoporosis (980,1836,8818,12930,12933,12952,38849,102145,107235); however, this research is confounded by a number of variables, including the presence of hormonal therapy and differing levels of fracture risk at baseline (1836,8818,95822). Conflicting findings on this topic might also be due to genetic differences in patient populations. A population analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study found that, in older females with the lowest genetic susceptibility to low bone mineral density (BMD), taking calcium with vitamin D is associated with a reduction in fracture risk. However, in females with a higher genetic susceptibility to low BMD, there is no association between supplementation and fracture risk. This might be because individuals with a lower susceptibility to low BMD are also more responsive to calcium and vitamin D supplementation (97357). As of April 2018, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with vitamin D >400 IU daily along with calcium >1000 mg daily is safe and effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture. USPSTF recommends against supplementing with calcium 1000 mg daily or less along with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal females (95695).
• Obesity. Oral calcium does not seem to improve weight loss. Details: Observational research has found that adults and children with low calcium intake are more likely to gain weight, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and be overweight or obese when compared to people with high calcium intake (12124,12125,12126,12127,14265). Additional observational research has found that increasing calcium intake is associated with weight loss in females; the results in males have been conflicting (12127,15602,15603). Despite these findings from observational research and a few small clinical studies (12128,15397,14438,98905), most clinical research has found that increased calcium intake does not increase weight loss (12052,13138,15396,15399,38985,39004,97356). The most recent meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies shows that daily dietary and supplemental calcium intake that meets the dietary reference intake (DRI) of 1000 mg or more daily does not increase weight loss in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when compared with intake below the DRI (95813). An older meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials also shows that increased dietary and supplemental calcium intake does not increase weight loss (15605).
• Overall mortality. Oral calcium does not seem to reduce overall mortality. Details: While some population research has found that calcium taken in combination with vitamin D in older females is associated with a lower risk of death (97353), most evidence shows that calcium, with or without vitamin D, has no effect on all-cause mortality (93533,97308).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral calcium does not reduce the risk of developing CVD and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Clinical research shows that calcium does not decrease CVD risk. Several separate meta-analyses of clinical and population research involving over 50,000 patients show that taking calcium 600-1200 mg daily for up to 7 years does not reduce the risk of CVD-related outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or overall mortality (39018,91350,92994,93533,97308,98902,107231,107233). No association was found between total dietary or supplemental calcium intake with or without vitamin D and the risk of CVD or mortality (91350,93533,97308). In fact, some population and clinical research has found that when calcium is used alone or with vitamin D, there is an INCREASED risk of CVD and coronary heart disease (38077,107233). However, other clinical research disagrees (93533). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease by 1.1-1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Intravenous calcium does not prevent nerve pain in patients given oxaliplatin. Oral calcium has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: While pooled analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials suggest that calcium and magnesium infusion decreases the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials shows that the infusion has no effect in preventing neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). Additionally, clinical trials show that administering calcium gluconate 1 gram with magnesium sulfate 1 gram intravenously immediately before, or before and after, the administration of a single oxaliplatin cycle (90005), or over the entire 6-cycle course of oxaliplatin, does not improve symptoms of neurotoxicity when compared with placebo (96474).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral calcium does not prevent MI. When taken in the absence of vitamin D, oral calcium may increase the risk of MI. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of calcium is associated with a decreased risk of MI (91350). However, a 2010 meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking calcium at a dose of at least 500 mg daily is associated with an approximate 30% INCREASE in the risk of MI in patients over the age of 40. According to this analysis, one additional case of MI will occur for every 69 patients that take calcium for 5 years (17482). A more recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of MI by 1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research studied postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233) In contrast, other meta-analyses of clinical research have shown that taking calcium for up to 7 years is NOT associated with an increased risk of MI, including a meta-analysis that only included postmenopausal females (93533,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI in postmenopausal females (93533). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for alcohol use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 800 mg and vitamin D 200 IU orally daily for 14 days modestly reduces alcohol craving scores and withdrawal scores when compared with placebo in adults with alcohol dependence that are undergoing withdrawal. Taking calcium carbonate did not reduce the need for diazepam; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (107234).
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for atherosclerosis. Details: A population study has found that taking calcium 1.2 grams daily for 3 years has no effect on carotid intima thickness or carotid atherosclerosis incidence. A total calcium intake (dietary and supplemental) of at least 1794 mg daily in older females may be associated with a decreased risk of carotid atherosclerosis when compared with a total calcium intake below 1010 mg daily (97351).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the odds of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. Details: A small observational study found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a 52% reduced odds of an autism spectrum disorder in the offspring (98900).
• Cancer. Oral calcium alone does not seem to prevent cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Taking calcium alone does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of cancer (12118,15629). The role of calcium in cancer prevention when taken along with vitamin D is controversial, as conflicting results exist. One clinical trial shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1400-1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1100 IU daily have a 60% lower relative risk for developing cancer of any type. Approximately 25 postmenopausal females would need to take this combination for 4 years to prevent one occurrence of cancer (15629). However, a more recent clinical study shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of cancer at 4 years (93943). Reasons for the disparate results are not entirely clear. The discrepancies do not appear to be related to baseline vitamin D levels or different study populations. It is possible that, given the 10-year time lapse between the two publications, the discrepancies result from differences in cancer detection capability. Also, since cancer risk was a secondary outcome measure in the earlier study and a primary outcome measure in the more recent study, it is possible that the discrepancies result from differences in statistical methodologies. The effect of vitamin D and calcium on cancer risk in males and younger patients is not known. There is also interest in using calcium for reducing the risk of hematological malignancies. An analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU for up to 10 years is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of hematologic malignancies when compared with placebo. However, no effect on hematologic malignancy related mortality was seen (97354).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between a higher dietary intake of calcium and the risk of depression when compared with a lower dietary intake of calcium (96480).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for type 2 diabetes prevention. Details: Some population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet or supplements, alone or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713,96473). However, population research is often limited by confounding variables. For example, one analysis found that any beneficial effect might be influenced by concomitant magnesium intake (96473). Furthermore, other population research has found that serum calcium levels higher than 9.6 mg/dL are associated with greater risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults with osteoporosis. This study is limited because it was not determined whether increased serum calcium was due to increased calcium intake or another factor such as parathyroid function (95815).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing pain associated with dysmenorrhea. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg with vitamin D 5000 IU daily for three menstrual cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (95821). However, calcium carbonate 1000 mg taken alone seems to reduce pain when compared with placebo.
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but dietary calcium does not seem to have any effect (38893).
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing falls. Details: Research suggests that calcium in combination with vitamin D, but not calcium alone, might prevent falls by decreasing body sway and normalizing systolic blood pressure (6362,11939,39038). Some experts think the combination of calcium and vitamin D may be important (11916). Preliminary clinical research in adults residing in a health care facility shows that taking vitamin D supplements while increasing dietary calcium and protein for 2 years reduces falls by 11% when compared with standard diets. Intervention diets were supplemented with milk, yogurt, and cheese to provide calcium 1142 mg and protein 69 grams daily (107235). There might also be different effects in females compared to males. In one study, females aged 65 years or older who took vitamin D 700 IU plus calcium citrate 500 mg daily over a 3-year period had a 46% lower risk of falling. However, this combination did not decrease falls in males (14291).
• Fluorosis. Oral calcium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking calcium orally, in combination with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and vitamin D, seems to be effective for reducing excessive fluoride levels in children and improving symptoms of fluorosis in children aged 6-12 years (990).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral calcium in combination with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing heart failure. Details: Based on a secondary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), taking calcium 1000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily does not reduce the risk of heart failure in the overall population or in individuals at high risk. However, in a subgroup of postmenopausal females without risk factors for heart failure, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of developing heart failure by about 37% (97307).
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for hypercholesterolemia. Details: Some evidence shows that taking calcium carbonate 400 mg three times daily reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4% and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 4% after 6 weeks of treatment when used in combination with a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) (2557). In contrast, a study in females with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 800 mg daily for 2 years might INCREASE total cholesterol levels by about 12 mg/dL when compared with placebo. This same study showed an association between calcium supplementation and an increase in total cholesterol levels and carotid intimal thickness in postmenopausal females, but not premenopausal females (97350). A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials which included both healthy patients and patients with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily and vitamin D 200-7142 IU daily modestly improves HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplementation is more effective in patients with dyslipidemia at baseline. It is unclear if this effect is due to calcium, vitamin D, or the combination (107227). However, other research shows that taking a specific supplement containing calcium 600 mg plus vitamin D 200 IU (Caltrate 600 D, Wyeth Consumer Healthcare Inc.) twice daily in combination with calorie restriction does not reduce total or LDL cholesterol levels when compared with placebo (15601).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing blood levels of lead. Details: Lead is mobilized along with calcium from bone during pregnancy and lactation, resulting in increased serum concentrations of lead. One clinical study suggests that calcium supplementation does not significantly decrease these elevated lead concentrations (1586). However, another clinical study suggests that taking calcium reduces blood lead levels by 11% when compared with placebo, with greatest effects observed in those with high baseline levels of lead (38957).
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral calcium for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of calcium for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium alone or with vitamin D is beneficial for metabolic syndrome prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet and supplements alone, or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713).
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing nephrotic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium 500-1000 mg daily for 3 months in combination with vitamin D3 60,000 IU daily or weekly for 4 weeks has no effect on bone mineral density or the risk of relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (97355).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking calcium alone or with vitamin D3 1000 IU daily reduced the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but had no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma (104622).
• Oral mucositis. When used in combination with fluoride treatments, a calcium phosphate mouth rinse seems to prevent and reduce mucositis-related pain in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that using a particular mouth rinse (Caphosol, EUSA Pharma) containing calcium phosphate, in combination with fluoride treatments, reduces days of mucositis, the duration of pain, and the dose and days of morphine used when compared with placebo and fluoride treatment (38611).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: An older meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (38792). However, a more recent pooled analysis of 15 cohort and case-control studies has found that the highest intake of dietary or dairy calcium is associated with a 20% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared to the lowest intake (97349).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing postpartum depression risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium 2 grams daily beginning at 11-21 weeks gestation reduces depression at 12 weeks postpartum when compared with placebo. However, no benefit is seen at 6 weeks postpartum (39447).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing leg cramps during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking calcium 1 gram twice daily (as a mixture of salts) for 2 weeks can reduce pregnancy-related leg cramps during the second half of pregnancy when compared with no treatment (2567).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily might decrease the risk of developing prostate cancer (14133). However, some epidemiological research suggests that consuming very high doses of calcium, over 2000 mg daily, might actually increase the risk of developing prostate cancer (14134). Some epidemiological research also suggests that doses greater than 1500 mg daily increase the risk of poorly differentiated, clinically advanced, and fatal prostate cancer (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer (98894). However, contradictory research suggests that there is no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall risk of prostate cancer (14131,14132,104630).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Some population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke (4822,38678). However, other population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is not associated with a decreased risk of stroke (91350). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years does not affect the risk of stroke when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females, and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Vertigo. Oral calcium with vitamin D might reduce positional vertigo; the effect of calcium when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking calcium 500 mg and vitamin D 400 IU twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate calcium for these uses.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

EFFECTIVE

• Bowel preparation. Oral sodium phosphate is effective for cleansing the colon in preparation for colonoscopy; however, it is unclear whether sodium phosphate is as effective as polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution. Some products are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this use. However, due to the potential for kidney damage, sodium phosphate is not recommended as first-line therapy. Details: Sodium phosphate tablets (OsmoPrep, Salix Pharmaceuticals; Visicol, Salix Pharmaceuticals) are FDA-approved for cleansing the colon in preparation for colonoscopy. Clinical research shows that using the OsmoPrep formulation can achieve an "excellent" or "good" response rate, which is defined as having 90% of the mucosa visible with only some or little suctioning needed, in 94% to 97% of patients (88133). Similarly, using the specific product Visicol has been shown to achieve an excellent or good response rate in 82% to 86% of patients (94674). Non-FDA-approved sodium phosphate products have also been investigated. One such product (Fleet Phospho-soda, C. B. Fleet Co.) has been shown to achieve adequate bowel cleansing in 23% to 89% of patients (93846,94673). Another sodium phosphate tablet preparation (Clicolon tablets, Korea Pharma Co.) has been shown to achieve adequate bowel cleansing in 63% to 93% of patients (93848,93850,93853). Excellent or good bowel cleansing was found in 98.6% of patients using a 32-tablet regimen of other sodium phosphate tablets (Quiklean, Universal Integrated Corporation) (107008). Reasons for the differences in the percentage of patients who achieve adequate bowel cleansing with the same sodium phosphate product may relate to the method used to analyze bowel cleansing, differences in diet followed during bowel cleansing, and demographic factors (93846,93848,93850,93853). Various preparations (OsmoPrep, Salix Pharmaceuticals; Visicol, Salix Pharmaceuticals; Clicolon tablets, Korea Pharma Co.; Quiklean, Universal Integrated Corporation) have been used which contain 1.102 grams of sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate and 0.398 grams of sodium phosphate dibasic anhydrous. These products have been taken as 3-4 tablets with 8 ounces of water every 15 minutes for a total of 20 tablets the evening before colonoscopy, and 3-4 tablets with 8 ounces of water every 15 minutes for a total of 12-20 tablets the morning of a colonoscopy (88133,93848,93850,94674,107008). Also, sodium phosphate solution (Fleet Phospho-soda, C. B. Fleet Co.) containing sodium hydrogen phosphate 24.4 grams and disodium phosphate dodecahydrate 10.8 grams has also been used the morning and evening before the procedure (93846). Numerous publications have compared the bowel cleansing activity of sodium phosphate with PEG solution. When given as a split-overnight dosage, sodium phosphate is about as effective as PEG solutions in achieving adequate bowel cleansing. However, when day-before dosage is used, PEG is more effective for bowel cleansing than sodium phosphate (93861,93862,107008). Sodium phosphate and PEG may have different effectiveness depending on the colonic site assessed. When only trials assessing descending colon cleansing are considered, sodium phosphate is found to work similarly to PEG solutions. When only studies assessing ascending colon cleansing are considered, PEG is more effective for bowel cleansing than sodium phosphate (93861). Also, a large clinical trial in outpatients scheduled for non-sedated colonoscopy shows that receiving PEG resulted in an easier insertion and a less painful colonoscopy when compared with receiving sodium phosphate (104473). However, in patients with chronic constipation, sodium phosphate seems to be preferable. A meta-analysis of three small clinical studies in adults with chronic constipation shows that using sodium phosphate has an 87% greater chance of a successful bowel preparation when compared with using PEG (104472). Sodium phosphate is not recommended as first-line therapy for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy due to the potential for kidney damage (93863,94672). In fact, one sodium phosphate preparation (Fleet Phospho-soda, C. B. Fleet Co.) that was previously approved as an over-the-counter supplement for bowel preparation in the US was withdrawn from the market for this indication in December 2008 due to concerns for phosphate-induced kidney disease (94672). Of the sodium phosphate products that are still approved by the FDA, current guidelines recommend that these products not be used for bowel cleansing in patients with kidney disease, pre-existing electrolyte disturbances, congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, ascites, or inflammatory bowel disease. Guidelines also recommend that caution should be used if these products are prescribed for patients who are elderly, hypertensive, or taking certain classes of drugs (94672). For small bowel preparation for endoscopy, a meta-analysis suggests that sodium phosphate is no more effective than fasting alone (93860).
• Hypophosphatemia. Oral or intravenous phosphate salts are effective for the prevention or treatment of hypophosphatemia. Some products are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this use. Details: Taking sodium or potassium phosphate orally is effective for preventing and treating hypophosphatemia (15). Treating hypophosphatemia with oral phosphates requires monitoring of serum electrolyte levels to determine appropriate dosing (15). The FDA-approved intravenous (IV) product is also used for the correction of hypophosphatemia (8302,8303,88135). FDA-approved intravenous (IV) sodium phosphate or potassium phosphate 15-30 mmol is typically given over 2-12 hours. Higher doses have been used if needed to increase efficacy (8302,8303,88135).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Constipation. Oral or rectal sodium phosphate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an ingredient in over-the-counter (OTC) products to treat constipation. Details: Sodium phosphate is an FDA-permitted ingredient of oral and rectal OTC products intended for the treatment of constipation (88107).
• Dyspepsia. Oral aluminum phosphate and calcium phosphate are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as ingredients in over-the-counter (OTC) antacids. Details: Aluminum phosphate and calcium phosphate are FDA-permitted ingredients of oral OTC products intended for use as antacids (88107).
• Hypercalcemia. Although other treatments are preferred, oral non-calcium phosphate salts are beneficial for treatment of mild to moderate hypercalcemia. Details: Taking phosphate salts (except calcium phosphate) orally is effective for treating mild to moderate hypercalcemia (88144,88145). Treating hypercalcemia with oral phosphates requires monitoring of serum electrolyte levels to determine appropriate dosing (15); other agents are now preferred (6479). Intravenous phosphates should be avoided due to the risk of calcium precipitation in vital organs (metastatic calcification) (15,88144,88145).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Oral potassium phosphate seems to be beneficial for prevention of kidney stones in individuals with hypercalciuria. Details: Taking potassium phosphate orally may help prevent calcium oxalate kidney stones in patients with hypercalciuria (6470). Clinical research in adults with absorptive hypercalciuria and at high risk for stone formation shows that taking a specific slow-release potassium phosphate product (Uro-Phos-K, Mission Pharmacal), providing phosphate 620 mg orally twice daily for 4 days, reduces urinary calcium excretion by 35% to 40% (2208,2209). Potassium and sodium phosphate salts providing 1200-1500 mg of elemental phosphate daily have been used (2209,6470).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Athletic performance. The evidence is mixed as to whether oral sodium phosphate improves cycling or running performance. Most research suggests that oral calcium phosphate and potassium phosphate are not beneficial. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium phosphate or potassium phosphate orally does not improve running or cycling performance (2499,9300,8301). Evidence for the use of sodium phosphate to improve cycling performance is mixed. One very small clinical study shows that taking sodium phosphate as tribasic sodium phosphate dodecahydrate for 6 days before a 10-mile cycling trial increases mean power output by about 10% and decreases the time needed to complete the trial by 3% in trained male cyclists (88150). Other small clinical trials in trained cyclists show that taking the same form of sodium phosphate as 50 mg/kg of fat-free mass in four divided doses daily for 6 days modestly improves work, power output, and peak oxygen uptake and reduces heart rate during high-intensity cycling exercise when compared to baseline (93857,93858,93859,107007). However, conflicting research shows that taking a similar dosage of this form of sodium phosphate does not improve time trial performance, work accomplished relative to energy expenditure, power output, or oxygen uptake in trained cyclists (93855,93856,107007). Sodium phosphate has also been evaluated for improving running performance, with mixed findings. Two small clinical trials in female athletes show that tribasic sodium phosphate dodecahydrate 50 mg/kg of fat-free mass taken in four divided doses daily for 6 days moderately improves repeated sprint times when compared with placebo (93843,93844). However, taking the same dosage does not significantly improve sprint times in male athletes (93849). Also, sodium phosphate does not seem to improve endurance or aerobic capacity in treadmill tests (8301,93854). Reasons for the discrepancies regarding the effects of sodium phosphate on athletic performance are not entirely clear, but likely relate to the very small number of participants in the included trials.
• Diabetic ketoacidosis. Potassium phosphate infusion is not recommended as first-line therapy for adults with diabetic ketoacidosis. Details: Clinical research shows that intravenous infusion of potassium phosphate 8.5 mmol/hour (approximately 6 grams of phosphate over 24 hours) along with potassium chloride 12.5 mEq/hour provides no benefit over potassium chloride alone in adults with diabetic ketoacidosis (88149). Guidelines for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis in the both the US and UK do not recommend phosphate replacement for most patients. However, it may be considered in specific cases, such as cardiac dysfunction, anemia, respiratory depression, and serum phosphate concentrations below 1 mg/dL (107349,107350A).
• Osteoporosis. Calcium phosphate seems to be beneficial for bone density improvement; however, it does not seem to be more beneficial than calcium carbonate. Details: In postmenopausal adults with osteoporosis and low phosphate intakes, taking calcium 1800 mg daily as tricalcium phosphate for 12 months improves lumbar spine and hip densities. However, it is no more effective than taking the same amount of calcium as calcium carbonate (93847). The calcium products were used in combination subcutaneous teriparatide and oral vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 1000 IU daily.
• Refeeding syndrome. It is unclear if intravenous potassium phosphate or sodium phosphate is beneficial for prevention of refeeding syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that giving intravenous sodium and potassium phosphates, 50 mmol (1.56 grams) phosphate over 24 hours, prevents the refeeding syndrome seen when restarting adequate nutrition after severe malnutrition or starvation when compared with historical controls (88148). More evidence is needed to rate phosphate salts for these uses.

(Read more about PHOSPHATE SALTS)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. High dietary intake of soy might be beneficial for the prevention of breast cancer and breast cancer recurrence in some patients. However, soy supplements do not seem to be beneficial. Details: For prevention, most population research has found that higher dietary intake of soy is associated with up to a 26% reduced odds of developing breast cancer when compared with a lower intake (7335,7336,11038,11807,75377,75587,90955,108251). One meta-analysis of population research found that patients who consumed more than 15 mg soy isoflavones daily made up about 25% of all cases of breast cancer, compared with 75% of cases in the group of patients consuming less than 15 mg daily (108251). The effects appear to vary depending on the ethnicity of the patient. Population research has consistently found that a high-soy diet in Asian and Asian-American females is associated with a significantly reduced risk of breast cancer (7335,7336,11038,11807,75377,75587,90955). However, the amount of soy consumed in a Western diet, even among those who consume the highest amounts of soy, was not found to have a preventative effect (11391,17109,90955,90967). The reason for the disparate findings are unknown but may be related to genetic differences or differences in quantification of soy intake (7663,94153). Also, the prophylactic benefit seems to apply regardless of whether high amounts of soy are consumed during adolescence or later in life (7335,7336,9674). Limited population research has also found that consuming a diet high in soy is associated with up to a 25% reduced risk of breast cancer recurrence; however, it is unclear whether there is an association with reduced mortality in breast cancer patients (90956,90969,94154). The effect appears to be greater for certain subgroups of breast cancer patients. Increased dietary soy intake is associated with a 28% to 36% risk reduction in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors, a 30% risk reduction in patients with ER-positive/progesterone receptor (PR)-positive tumors, and a 25% to 36% risk reduction in postmenopausal patients (90956). Some small clinical studies have also evaluated the use of soy isoflavone extract . One small clinical study in patients with breast cancer shows that taking a soy isoflavone extract 200 mg daily for 2 weeks prior to surgery does not seem to affect cancer cell growth when compared with a historical control (11042). Another small clinical study in patients at high risk for breast cancer or with a history of breast cancer shows that taking a soy tablet containing 50 mg soy isoflavones (Novasoy, Archer Daniels Midland Co.) daily for 12 months does not alter mammographic or breast tissue density when compared with placebo (95999).
• Chronic kidney disease (CKD). Oral soy protein seems to improve some measures of disease severity in patients with CKD. Details: Clinical research shows that consuming soy protein seems to reduce proteinuria in people with kidney disease (2286,2287,2288,75249,75634). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with CKD who are not on dialysis shows that soy protein intake reduces serum levels of creatinine by 0.07 mg/dL, phosphorus by 2.5 mg/dL, and triglyceride by 18 mg/dL when compared with placebo or control (90989).
• Diabetes. Diets high in soy seem to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes. Also, oral soy protein, but not soy isoflavones, seems to modestly improve glycemic indices. It is unclear if soy is beneficial for lowering blood lipid levels or reducing cardiovascular (CVD) mortality risk in adults with type 2 diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of observational studies has found that higher dietary intake of tofu, soy protein, or soy isoflavones is associated with an 8% to 16% lower risk of developing diabetes when compared with a lower dietary intake (105608). In menopausal patients without diabetes, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intake of soy isoflavones 40-161 mg daily seems to improve glycemic indices when compared with control (96423). Some research shows that soy can modestly improve glycemic indices in patients with diabetes. A meta-analysis of small low-quality clinical studies in patients with diabetes or metabolic syndrome shows that taking various formulations of soy protein modestly reduces fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels, as well as insulin resistance, when compared with control (96001). An older meta-analysis assessing both healthy patients and patients with diabetes shows that a whole soy diet reduces fasting blood glucose by about 4 mg/dL when compared with control (75493). Small clinical studies also suggest that an extract of the fermented soybean product, Touchi, acts as an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor. It seems to modestly lower blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and triglycerides in patients with type 2 diabetes (11762,75205). However, some conflicting evidence exists. A meta-analysis of small, low-quality clinical studies in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking soy isoflavones does not improve glycemic indices when compared with control (105610). Also, another meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking soy protein and/or soy isoflavones for 6-12 weeks does not improve glycemic indices when compared with either soy protein without isoflavones, other protein, or placebo (105610). Reasons for these conflicting results are unclear but may relate to differences in baseline blood glucose levels, the formulation of soy, or the duration of treatment. Some research shows that soy may modestly improve the lipid profile in patients with diabetes. A meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with diabetes shows that taking soy protein and/or soy isoflavones for 6-12 weeks modestly reduces levels of total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, but not high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol or triglycerides, when compared with control (105610). Consuming soy foods might reduce the risk of mortality related to CVD in patients with diabetes. Population research suggests that consuming soy foods at least four days each week is associated with a 23% reduced risk of CVD mortality when compared with never consuming soy foods. Consuming soy foods less than four times weekly is not associated with CVD mortality risk (108242). Soy is also of interest in the prevention or treatment of gestational diabetes. Population research has found that consumption of less than 40 grams of soy daily in the second trimester is associated with a 2.1-fold increased risk of gestational diabetes when compared with daily soy intake of 40 grams or more (108241). Also, a small clinical trial in patients with gestational diabetes shows that consuming a diet containing about 0.3 grams/kg soy protein for 6 weeks, beginning at 24-28 weeks' gestation, reduces blood glucose levels, insulin resistance, and triglyceride levels when compared with consuming a non-soy control diet (95993).
• Diarrhea. Oral soy fiber seems to reduce acute diarrhea in infants, although it may not be beneficial in adults. Details: Giving soy fiber-supplemented formula orally, either alone or in combination with oral rehydration solution, seems to reduce the duration of acute diarrhea in infants when compared with cow's milk formula or oral rehydration solution alone (2291,2292,75474,75517,75523,75531,75572). However, in some studies, a reduction in the duration of acute diarrhea was not observed when compared with cow's milk formula (75522,75542). In adult patients receiving nutrition via intubation, preliminary clinical research suggests that treatment with soy-polysaccharide fiber does not improve the incidence of diarrhea when compared to control (75508).
• Galactosemia. Oral soy protein can be used in infant formula to prevent symptoms of galactosemia. Details: Soy does not contain the sugar galactose. Some research suggests that giving oral isolated soy protein-based formula in place of milk-based formula to infants seems to be helpful for preventing symptoms of galactosemia (3400).
• Hyperlipidemia. Oral soy protein seems to modestly reduce lipid levels. However, purified soy isoflavone may not have the same benefit. Details: Consuming soy protein orally, in place of other dietary protein, seems to modestly reduce total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by about 3% to 4% when compared with control (842,2293,2294,2296,2585,3402,4755,6412,7346,7803)(8530,10459,42059,75356,105598,105604). Additionally, some research shows that soy protein might be more effective in patients with more severe hyperlipidemia (75497). The FDA has approved labeling for specific soy products that states that they may be used for cholesterol reduction in combination with a diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol. To be eligible for this labeling, soy products must provide at least 6.25 grams of soy protein per serving, which is 25% of the effective daily intake (3977). However, not all evidence is positive. Some studies have shown no benefit of soy protein or isoflavones on LDL cholesterol levels when compared to control (8521,9679,12034,17105,53771,75236)(75242,75274,75276). Furthermore, although a few clinical trials have shown significant decreases in triglycerides following supplementation with soy or soy protein isolate (75258,75365), most studies suggest that soy protein does not decrease triglycerides when compared to control (2293,6412,8530,12034,17105). The effect of soy protein on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is inconsistent. Most studies suggest that it does not increase HDL levels (2293,6412,8530,12034,75286)(75524), although some analyses of clinical research suggest that soy might increase HDL cholesterol levels by up to 4% when compared to control (75480,75497). Doses of soy protein have ranged from 25-135 grams daily, providing 40-318 mg daily of isoflavones; however, higher doses do not seem to be more effective (17106,105598). Some evidence suggests that soy protein providing more isoflavones, or supplemented with isoflavones, might be more effective (3402,6413,10459), but this has not been consistently found in studies (3402). Most studies evaluating soy protein products containing little to no isoflavones suggest that these products are not effective (3402,7346,9679); however, purified soy isoflavone supplements alone do not seem to decrease LDL cholesterol (851,4738,7345,8502,10459,14066). In addition to soy protein, limited evidence suggests that soy fiber alone might reduce total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels when compared with placebo (75686,75689). There is also some evidence that ultra-high temperature (UHT) treatment of soy milk destroys any cholesterol-lowering activity (17106).
• Hypertension. Oral soy seems to modestly reduce blood pressure in some patients. Details: A meta-analysis of the available clinical research shows that consuming soy products modestly lowers systolic and diastolic blood pressure by an average of 1.6 mmHg and 1.2 mmHg, respectively, when compared with control (105605). This analysis is limited by high risk of bias and the lack of a dose-response relationship. An older meta-analysis, as well as individual clinical studies, in patients with prehypertension or mild hypertension show that consuming soy protein 18-40 grams, providing 118-143 mg of isoflavones, daily or black soy peptide 4.5 grams daily for 8 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure by about 4-8 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by about 3-5 mmHg when compared with control (1313990962,90965). In normotensive patients, soy protein does not seem to reduce systolic or diastolic blood pressure (90965).
• Lactose intolerance. Oral soy protein can be used in infant formula to prevent symptoms of lactose intolerance. Details: Providing isolated soy protein-based formula orally to infants is an acceptable alternative to milk-based formulas, especially for infants with symptoms of lactose intolerance (3400).
• Menopausal symptoms. Oral soy seems to reduce hot flashes in patients with menopausal symptoms. Details: Consuming soy protein 15-60 grams, providing 34-100 mg of isoflavones, daily seems to modestly decrease the frequency and severity of hot flashes in some menopausal adults. Improvement seems to be greater in those with a higher frequency of hot flashes at baseline (2296,2297,3978,3986,3987,7653,9917,11805,15220,17110,75478)(75486,75649,92661,95997). Taking concentrated soy isoflavone extracts, providing 35-200 mg of isoflavones, daily seems to have similar effects (4751,6455,7802,9916,10460,11805,11993,11994,13209,15220)(15850,75478,90950,90979,92661). Higher doses of 100-200 mg of isoflavones daily and higher frequency of dosing intervals seem to have greater benefit (90950). Furthermore, the amount of the specific isoflavone genistein contained in a soy product may influence outcomes. According to one analysis, studies using products that provide at least 15 mg of genistein daily consistently show positive outcomes. Studies using products containing a lower concentration of genistein have produced inconsistent findings (15133). Not all research has found that soy extracts reduce hot flashes (7801,11806,14062,15038,15851,16762); some experts speculate that this is due to a high placebo response (9916). Some clinical research has compared soy isoflavone extracts to conventional estrogen replacement. In one study, a concentrated soy isoflavone extract of genistein 54 mg daily reduced hot flashes by 22% to 29%, compared to 54% in those taking 17beta-estradiol as 1 mg daily plus norethisterone acetate 0.5 mg daily (11994). Additional preliminary research suggests that taking a soy isoflavone extract providing 60 mg isoflavones twice daily is comparable in efficacy to conjugated estrogens 0.625 daily for reducing menopausal symptoms. Conjugated estrogens seem to work more quickly; it seems to take up to 2 months to achieve the full effect of soy isoflavones (13209). One clinical trial compared soy isoflavones 10-40 mg daily to S-equol, a soy isoflavone metabolite. Soy isoflavones were less effective for reducing hot flash frequency when compared with S-equol (90960). This has led to some speculation that the effectiveness of soy in relieving hot flashes is influenced by a patient's ability to convert daidzen, a soy isoflavone, to S-equol (90950). It is theorized that patients who are S-equol producers are more likely to achieve symptom relief from soy. However, observational and clinical research does not support this theory (90990,94162). Soy has also been evaluated for the management of other symptoms of menopause. Some clinical research in menopausal patients with depression suggests that taking soy 100 mg, providing 50 mg of soy isoflavones, in combination with sertraline 50 mg daily for three months improves depression severity when compared with sertraline or soy alone (90958). An analysis of two small clinical trials shows that supplemental soy providing 50-118 mg of isoflavones can reduce vaginal dryness scores by 0.26 when compared with control (92661). Also, an open-label study suggests that drinking a specific beverage (ViveSoy) containing soy protein 15 grams and soy isoflavones 50 mg orally daily for 12 weeks reduces overall urogenital symptoms when compared with a control group (95997). However, one small clinical study in perimenopausal patients shows that a soy-rich diet does not relieve urogenital symptoms, including vaginal dryness, itching, and urinary incontinence, when compared with a soy-free diet (75285).
• Metabolic syndrome. Oral soy protein seems to improve glycemic control and other markers of metabolic syndrome. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with diabetes or metabolic syndrome shows that following a diet high in soy protein can decrease fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels, as well as insulin resistance, when compared with a control diet. Furthermore, dietary intake of soy protein modestly decreases diastolic blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by a small amount in this population, although there is no effect on systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglycerides (96001). Other clinical research shows that consuming a soy nut diet or a soy protein diet reduces fasting plasma glucose and LDL cholesterol levels when compared to baseline in postmenopausal adults with metabolic syndrome; however, the soy nut diet seems to more beneficial than either the soy protein diet or a Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet (75378).
• Muscle strength. Oral soy protein seems to increase muscle strength. Details: Overall, soy protein combined with resistance training seems to increase muscle strength when compared with placebo (16748,75246,96942,98871). A meta-analysis of three clinical studies shows that consuming soy protein in addition to resistance training improves strength and lean body mass in untrained athletes (98871). Other clinical research shows that soy also improves muscle strength in trained athletes and postmenopausal adults (75246,96942). One study in Olympic endurance athletes shows that consuming isolated soy protein (Supro) 1.5 grams/kg daily for 8 weeks increases body mass and strength indices and reduces fatigue when compared with no protein supplementation (75246). Clinical research in postmenopausal adults undergoing resistance training 3 days weekly shows that taking soy protein 25 grams daily in skim milk for 16 weeks increases the maximum amount of weight lifted in one repetition by over 80% for both bench press and knee extension when compared to a maltodextrin placebo (96942). Soy protein has also been compared with other protein supplements. A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical studies and other clinical research show that soy protein seems to work as well as whey, beef, and dairy (casein and whey) protein for improving muscle strength (75404,85941,98871,105591). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the small size and high heterogeneity of the studies.
• Osteoporosis. Oral soy isoflavones seem to improve bone density and reduce the risk of osteoporosis in post-menopausal adults. Details: Most clinical research suggests that soy protein or soy extract containing 75-90 mg of isoflavones can increase bone mineral density (BMD), or slow BMD loss, and improve biochemical markers of bone turnover in peri- and postmenopausal adults when compared with control (842,4951,6449,9775,11082,90972,90980). Lower doses of isoflavones do not seem to be as beneficial. However, some observational research in postmenopausal Japanese adults and Chinese females aged 30-40 years has found that consuming about 50 mg dietary soy isoflavones daily is associated with a higher BMD when compared with lower soy isoflavone intake (7342,11081). An observational study in postmenopausal Asian patients has found that consuming higher dietary soy protein is associated with a lower risk of developing fractures when compared with lower amounts (13181). However, not all research has been positive. Some conflicting evidence suggests that soy protein does not improve BMD in some postmenopausal adults. The discrepancy in findings may be due to differences in soy formulations, concomitant treatments, or variable patient populations (4952,12034,14064,90978). For example, most evidence shows that soy does not affect BMD in premenopausal patients or bone turnover in adolescents (7660,8532,9684,11086). It is theorized that only people who can convert daidzein, a soy isoflavone, to S-equol might obtain benefits from soy (4952). However, clinical research suggests that there is no difference in bone calcium retention between equol producers and nonproducers (95995).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Oral soy does not seem to reduce BPH symptoms. Details: Clinical research in patients with BPH shows that taking soy isoflavones 40 mg (Soylife 40, Acatris) daily for 12 months does not improve peak urine flow rate, residual urine volume, symptoms of BPH, or general quality of life when compared with placebo (90983).
• Breast cancer-related hot flashes. Oral soy does not seem to reduce the risk for breast cancer-related hot flashes. Details: Clinical research shows that consuming a soy beverage providing soy isoflavones 90 mg daily or taking a soy extract providing soy isoflavones 50 mg three times daily does not reduce hot flashes in breast cancer survivors (3991,7658,8499). Observational research in breast cancer survivors has also found no association between hot flash incidence and soy isoflavone consumption (105602).
• Colorectal cancer. Oral soy does not seem to reduce the risk for colorectal cancer. Details: Some observational research from China and Japan has found that intake of soy protein or soy isoflavone is not associated with the risk of developing colorectal cancer (105601). Furthermore, some clinical research shows that soy protein powder 58 grams containing isoflavones 83 mg, taken daily for 12 months, does not reduce the proliferation of colorectal epithelial cells in patients with adenomatous polyps when compared to control (75282).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Oral soy does not seem to reduce muscle soreness after exercise. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking soy isoflavone extract 120 mg orally for 30 days prior to exercise doesn't ameliorate muscle soreness caused by exercise when compared with placebo (8524).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral soy improves cognition in patients with Alzheimer disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with Alzheimer disease shows that taking soy isoflavones (Novasoy, Archer Daniels Midland Co.) 100 mg daily for 6 months does not improve cognition when compared with placebo (96424).
• Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-associated hot flashes. One small clinical study in patients with prostate cancer receiving ADT shows that taking soy protein powder 20 grams, providing 160 mg of isoflavones, alone or along with venlafaxine 75 mg, once daily for 12 weeks does not improve the severity of hot flash symptoms when compared with milk protein, with or without venlafaxine (90981).
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral soy reduces asthma symptoms. Details: One population study has found that people with asthma who consume soy foods providing more than 250 mcg of genistein for every 1000 kcal consumed (e.g., 500 mcg/day for 2000 kcal diet) daily have increased lung function, as measured by FEV1 scores, when compared to those who consume less (11084). However, clinical research in adult and pediatric patients with poorly controlled asthma shows that taking soy isoflavones 50 mg twice daily for 24 weeks does not improve FEV1 scores, reduce the number of asthma episodes, or improve asthma symptoms when compared with placebo (90977).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if soy consumption reduces the risk for CVD or CVD-related mortality. More research is needed to determine whether certain populations may benefit from increased soy intake. Details: Due to mixed findings, it is unclear if consuming soy is associated with a reduced risk of CVD events. One population study has found that consuming at least 60 grams of soy daily over a 12-month period is associated with a 14% reduced risk of having a CVD event over the next 5 years, as well as a reduced risk of stroke, when compared with consuming less than 15 grams daily (108253). A study in Japan has found that consuming soy five or more times per week over a 10-year period is associated with fewer adverse cardiovascular outcomes in only a certain subset of patients when compared with consuming soy twice a week or less. Postmenopausal adults with the highest consumption had a 36% lower risk of stroke, a 45% lower risk of myocardial infarction, and a 65% lower risk of CVD mortality. However, risk was not significantly reduced in males or premenopausal adults (17108). In contrast, a study in Korea has found that consuming a median of 16.5 servings of soy per week is associated with a 64% reduced risk of CVD incidence in premenopausal, but not postmenopausal, adults when compared with a median of 4.7 servings per week. A subgroup analysis has found that the highest intake of tofu, but not soybeans, fermented soy paste, or soy milk, is associated with a reduced incidence of CVD (108243). Additionally, higher dietary intake of soy does not seem to be associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular events in Western females (13040). The amount of phytoestrogens typically consumed in Western diets is significantly lower than the amount typically consumed in Asian diets. The form of soy food and isoflavone content might play a role in these discrepancies. Any association between consumption of soy-containing foods and CVD mortality is also unclear. A meta-analysis of observational studies conducted in China or Japan has found that the highest intake of soy-containing foods is not associated with a lower risk of CVD-related mortality when compared with the lowest intake (96941). A population study in patients with or without a prior history of CVD has also found that soy-containing food consumption is not associated with a lower risk of CVD-related mortality when compared with the lowest intake (108244). However, some research has found a positive effect of soy consumption on CVD mortality risk. A subgroup analysis of a meta-analysis has found that the highest intake of fermented soy products is associated with a 16% reduced risk of CVD mortality; higher intake of non-fermented soy is not associated with CVD mortality (96941). Population research in patients without a prior history of CVD has found that soy-containing food consumption is associated with a lower risk of myocardial infarction-related mortality when compared with the lowest intake (108244). Also, one population study in adults with type 2 diabetes has found that consuming soy-containing foods at least four days each week is associated with a 23% reduced risk of CVD mortality when compared with never consuming soy foods. Consuming soy foods less than four times weekly is not associated with CVD-related mortality (108242).
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral soy reduces the risk for cervical cancer. Details: Population research has found that the highest dietary intake of soy over approximately 17 years is associated with a 57% decreased risk of cervical cancer when compared to the lowest intake of soy in females who also drank green tea. However, neither soy intake nor green tea intake alone was associated with a decreased risk of cervical cancer. Additionally, other population research has not confirmed an association between soy intake and cervical cancer (101800).
• Child growth. It is unclear if oral soy protein enhances child growth. Details: Preliminary clinical research in Colombian children 2-7 years of age shows that consuming a soy protein supplement dissolved in fruit juice on 6 days of every week for 1 year does not improve body mass index, body composition, weight, or height when compared with consuming fruit juice and whole milk. A sub-analysis shows that children consuming the soy protein supplement had an increase in weight-for-age when compared with the control group, indicating that the supplement may be beneficial for ensuring adequate weight and nutritional status during prepubertal growth (100320). However, the children in this study had normal or below average weight-for-age at baseline, limiting the applicability of these findings to other patient populations.
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral soy improves cognitive function; research is conflicting. Details: Some research shows that college students who increase consumption of soy foods providing isoflavones 100 mg daily have improved short- and long-term memory (9671). Postmenopausal patients aged 50-65 years who take a soy extract supplement providing isoflavones 60 mg daily also seem to have some improvement in some measures of cognitive function (12048). There is also evidence in postmenopausal patients aged 55-75 years that taking a soy extract supplement providing isoflavones 110 mg daily might improve verbal memory scores (12040). However, another study in this population shows that consuming 25.6 grams daily of soy protein providing 99 mg of isoflavones does not improve cognitive function (12034). Similarly, population research in females aged 42-52 years has found that increasing dietary intake of the isoflavones genistein and daidzein is not associated with improved measures of cognitive function (15042). These differing findings might be explained by variations in study design and soy formulations.
• Cognitive impairment. Oral soy has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults 55 years of age and older with mild cognitive impairment shows that taking a specific combination product (DW2009) containing fermented soybean powder and Lactobacillus plantarum daily for 12 weeks modestly improves composite cognitive function when compared with placebo (100319). It is not clear if this effect is due to soy, lactobacillus, or the combination.
• Colic. It is unclear if oral soy is beneficial in infants with colic. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming soy-based formula might reduce the duration of colic symptoms in infants with cows' milk intolerance (75509,75543). However, other clinical research shows that consuming soy-based formula does not improve crying in infants with colic when compared with dicyclomine hydrochloride 3 mg/kg daily (75573). Also, a meta-analysis of only high quality clinical research shows that soy milk formula does not improve the persistence of colic or the duration of crying in infants with colic when compared with control (75611).
• Crohn disease. It is unclear if oral soy improves symptoms of Crohn disease. Details: A small observational study in patients with inactive Crohn disease has found that taking oral soy-derived protein in combination with enteral treatment for 4 weeks is associated with increased bowel movements, improved symptoms such as fatigue and mental strain, and increased body weight when compared with standard enteral treatment alone (75175).
• Diabetic nephropathy. It is unclear if oral soy improves kidney function in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical trials in patients with diabetic nephropathy shows that consuming soy products, such as soy protein and soy milk, modestly reduces proteinuria and blood urea nitrogen (BUN), as well as levels of total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and fasting blood glucose, when compared with animal protein or cow's milk. However, there was no effect on any measures of kidney function (108247). Some individual small clinical trials show that replacing dietary animal protein with soy protein reduces urinary albumin excretion in patients with diabetic nephropathy (7348,12555,12556). However, one small clinical study shows that consuming soy milk 240 mL daily for 4 weeks does not affect urinary creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, proteinuria, or glomerular filtration rate in patients with diabetic nephropathy (90966).
• Dyspepsia. Oral soy protein has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults with mild or moderate dyspepsia shows that consuming 1 gram of toasted soy flour fermented with Lactobacillus delbrueckii up to three times daily for 3 weeks does not improve heartburn severity or frequency when compared with placebo (105599).
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral soy protein reduces the risk for endometrial cancer. Details: Most epidemiological research has found that increased soy intake is associated with a lower risk of endometrial cancer. Endometrial cancer incidence is lower in Japan, China, and other Asian countries where the typical diet is low in calories and high in soy, whole grain foods, vegetables, and fruits (7338,11036,90954). Also, a large meta-analysis of population research has found that the highest total and fermented soy intake is associated with a 17% to 19% reduced risk of developing endometrial cancer when compared to the lowest intakes in postmenopausal adults (96002). However, one clinical study shows that taking soy protein 25 grams daily providing 91 mg of aglycon equivalents of isoflavones and glycosides for three years does not reduce the risk of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer when compared with placebo in postmenopausal adults. However, this study may not have been adequately powered to detect small differences in the low rates of endometrial hyperplasia (90971).
• Fibromyalgia. It is unclear if oral soy reduces fibromyalgia symptoms. Details: Clinical research shows that consuming a shake containing soy protein 20 grams and soy isoflavone 160 mg once daily for 6 weeks does not improve physical functioning or symptoms of depression in patients with fibromyalgia when compared with placebo (75451).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral soy reduces the risk for gastric cancer. Details: Meta-analyses of population research have found that the highest intake of soy-containing foods and nonfermented soy products is associated with a 21% to 37% decreased risk of gastric cancer when compared with the lowest intake (95998,108246). Intake of at least 100 grams daily of nonfermented soy foods was found to be the most protective (95998). However, a high intake of fermented soy products is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer, and intake of 1-5 cups daily of the fermented soy product miso soup is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer in males (95998,108246).
• Hepatitis C. It is unclear if oral soy is beneficial for hepatitis C. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with hepatitis C shows that taking soy protein 32 grams daily for 12 weeks reduces the number of cases of steatosis by 47% and reduces alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels by 13% when compared to baseline. However, it is no different than taking casein protein (90970).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). A small study suggests that oral soy isoflavones might reduce IBS symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in females with IBS shows that taking soy isoflavones 40 mg daily for 6 weeks improves symptoms of IBS, such as abdominal distention and abdominal pain severity and duration, by approximately 27% when compared with placebo. Quality of life is also improved. Some symptoms are also improved when soy isoflavones are taken in combination with vitamin D; however, the combination of soy isoflavones and vitamin D does not seem to improve symptoms better than soy isoflavones alone (96425).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if dietary soy reduces the risk for lung cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that although increased soy intake is not associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer overall, it is associated with a slightly reduced risk in nonsmoking adults (90985).
• Mastalgia. It is unclear if oral soy is beneficial for mastalgia. Details: A small clinical study suggests that soy milk providing 34 grams soy protein daily might reduce cyclical breast pain when compared with no intervention (2428).
• Migraine headache. Oral soy has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of soy isoflavones 60 mg, dong quai 100 mg, and black cohosh 50 mg daily for 24 weeks reduces the frequency of menstrual-associated migraine attacks when compared with placebo (35797). It is not clear if this effect is due to soy, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Neonatal jaundice. It is unclear if oral soy reduces the risk of neonatal jaundice. Details: Clinical research shows that patients with gestational diabetes who consume a diet containing soy protein along with other plant and animal proteins for 6 weeks beginning at 24-28 weeks' gestation have a 73% reduced risk for newborn hyperbilirubinemia when compared with those consuming a control diet containing only non-soy plant and animal proteins (95993).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral soy is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of NAFLD. Details: Observational research in a Chinese population has found that increased frequency of dietary soy consumption is associated with a lower incidence of NAFLD when compared with lower consumption (105612). A meta-analysis of three small clinical trials in patients living in Iran with NAFLD shows that consuming soy milk, soy foods, or a genistein supplement for 8 weeks might reduce some liver transaminase levels when compared with control (105611). Another meta-analysis of small clinical trials in patients with NAFLD shows that consuming soy milk, soy foods, or a genistein supplement for 8 or 24 weeks modestly improves insulin resistance but does not improve body mass index, cholesterol levels, or liver transaminase levels (108239). These analyses are limited by their generally small population size and the heterogeneity of interventions.
• Obesity. It is unclear if consuming oral soy protein as part of a calorie-restricted diet improves weight loss; research is conflicting. Details: Some clinical research shows that consuming soy protein in conjunction with calorie restriction for 2-6 months helps reduce weight in those who are obese and overweight when compared with calorie restriction alone (11085,75397). Other clinical research shows that consuming soy protein for 16 weeks improves weight loss in overweight females when compared with consuming protein from meat (75620). Also, consuming black soy peptide 4.5 grams daily for 12 weeks reduces body weight and body fat mass more than placebo in overweight and obese adults (90961). In addition, some clinical evidence shows that eating biscuits supplemented with soy fiber 100 grams daily for 12 weeks reduces body weight, body mass index (BMI), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when compared to control in overweight and obese patients (90960). However, contradictory evidence exists. Some clinical research shows that following a calorie-restricted diet and consuming soy-based meal replacements 3-5 times daily for 12-16 weeks, or eating soy protein-rich foods in place of animal protein for 2-12 weeks, does not improve weight loss in overweight or obese individuals when compared to a calorie-restricted diet alone (75277,75372,75376,90968). Also, in overweight and obese females following a free-choice diet, soy protein 56 grams daily for 23 weeks does not appear to improve weight loss when compared to eating an isoenergetic amount of carbohydrates (86077). Finally, a subgroup analysis of six preliminary clinical trials shows that soy products do not improve weight loss in postmenopausal adults (98870). The reason for these disparate findings is unclear but may be due to differences in the soy products used or differences in patient population. For example, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that phytoestrogen consumption reduces weight in healthy postmenopausal adults but not in those with comorbid conditions (98870). However, the clinical validity of this analysis is limited because it did not evaluate the effect of soy-only phytoestrogens. Soy protein has also been compared with whey protein. One small clinical study in overweight and obese adults shows that patients taking soy protein isolate 52 grams for 23 weeks had similar overall weight and fat loss as those taking whey protein concentrate 52 grams daily (86077). In contrast, another small clinical study in overweight males shows that taking soy isolate 60 grams before lunch daily for 12 weeks is less effective for weight loss when compared with taking whey protein concentrate 65 grams (91801).
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral soy protein reduces osteoarthritis pain. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking soy protein 40 grams daily for three months improves range of motion, pain, and quality of life in osteoarthritis patients, particularly males, when compared to baseline. However, these beneficial effects seem to also be observed following supplementation with milk-based protein, indicating that the benefits may have resulted from a placebo effect (75266).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if dietary soy reduces overall mortality; the available research is conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of observational studies has found that the highest intake of soy products is not associated with a lower risk of overall mortality, mortality from cardiovascular disease, or mortality from cancer when compared with the lowest intake (96941). However, a more recent population study has found that consuming at least 60 grams of soy daily over a 12-month period is associated with a 17% reduced risk of overall mortality over the next 5 years when compared with consuming less than 15 grams daily (108253). Also, an observational study in Japanese patients followed over 14.8 years has found that although overall soy intake is not associated with any benefit, increased intake of fermented soy products, such as natto and miso, was found to be associated with a slightly reduced risk of mortality (105600).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral soy reduces PCOS symptoms. Details: Clinical research shows that taking soy isoflavones 50 mg daily for 12 weeks improves insulin levels and insulin resistance by a small amount when compared with placebo in patients with PCOS. Furthermore, taking soy isoflavones improves the free androgen index by approximately 25% and triglyceride levels by 14% when compared to baseline. However, taking soy isoflavones does not improve low- or high-density lipoprotein (LDL or HDL) cholesterol levels or markers of inflammation (95994).
• Postmenopausal conditions. It is unclear if oral soy is beneficial for postmenopausal conditions. Details: A meta-analysis of generally small clinical trials in postmenopausal adults shows that taking soy protein with isoflavones or soy isoflavones, usually for 3-24 months, has modest beneficial effects on total cholesterol, and possibly high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, when compared with milk protein, soy protein without isoflavones, or placebo. However, there was no effect on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or triglyceride levels. Subgroup analyses show that reductions in LDL cholesterol levels occur when soy is used for less than 6 months, in individuals older than 55 years, and when the soy protein contains isoflavones (108249).
• Preterm labor. It is unclear if oral soy reduces the risk for preterm labor. Details: Clinical research in patients with gestational diabetes shows that consuming a diet containing soy protein along with other plant and animal proteins for 6 weeks, beginning at 24-28 weeks' gestation, does not reduce the likelihood for caesarean section, preterm delivery, or maternal hospitalization when compared with a control diet containing only non-soy plant and animal proteins (95993).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). It is unclear if oral soy reduces PMS symptoms. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with PMS shows that taking isolated soy protein containing soy isoflavones 68 mg daily for two menstrual cycles reduces cramps and swelling when compared with placebo (75279).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral soy is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of prostate cancer; research is conflicting. Details: Observational and clinical research has evaluated the effects of soy intake on prostate cancer risk. Observational research has found that consuming an Asian diet, which contains 10 times more soy than the average American diet, is associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer; however, it is unclear whether it is the soy content of the diet or if genetic differences or environmental factors such as fat ingestion are responsible for this correlation (2298,12884,12886,12887). A meta-analysis of observational trials from North America, Europe, and Asia has found that highest intake of total soy foods, unfermented soy foods, or soy isoflavones is associated with a reduced risk of prostate cancer when compared with the lowest intakes. However, higher intake of fermented soy foods is not associated with a reduced risk (96939). Furthermore, some observational research in Japanese males has found a weak association between increased prostate cancer mortality and a higher dietary intake of soy isoflavones when compared with a lower intake (105607). Research evaluating the use of soy supplements is also conflicting. One clinical study shows that taking soy protein 40 grams daily for 6 months reduces the development of prostate cancer six-fold in those at risk of prostate cancer when compared with milk protein (75432). However, another clinical study in healthy adults aged 50-80 years shows that taking soy protein, providing 83 mg isoflavones, daily for a year does not affect PSA levels when compared with a soy protein drink without isoflavones (12888). Soy products have also been evaluated in patients with prostate cancer. One clinical study shows that consuming a specific bread containing 50 grams of soy, providing 117 mg isoflavones, reduces PSA levels after about 3 weeks of treatment when compared with control (13140). Other preliminary clinical research in patients with rising PSA levels following prior therapy for prostate cancer shows that consuming 8 ounces of soy milk, standardized to contain 47 mg isoflavones, three times daily for 12 months slows the increase in PSA levels from 56% to 20% when compared with baseline (75435). However, one clinical study shows that taking soy protein 40 grams daily for 6 months does not reduce prostate size or improve PSA levels in those diagnosed with prostate cancer when compared with milk protein (75432). Also, in those with early stage prostate cancer, consuming a soy beverage daily providing genistein 60 mg does not seem to affect risk factors for progression of prostate cancer, including testosterone, estradiol, PSA, and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels (11033). Furthermore, consuming soy protein isolate 20 grams standardized to contain approximately 70 mg isoflavones daily for two years does not prevent prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy when compared with placebo (90953). Reasons for the discrepancies are not entirely clear, but may include the relatively short trial durations (up to 12 months) and heterogeneity of soy preparations and dosing regimens.
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if oral soy reduces RA symptoms. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with RA shows that consuming a liquid diet containing hydrolyzed soy protein (Top Up) daily for 4 weeks does not improve pain intensity, morning stiffness, or joint swelling and tenderness when compared to consuming a normal daily diet (75619).
• Sarcopenia. It is unclear if oral soy reduces age-related muscle loss; evidence is conflicting. Details: Some clinical research in postmenopausal adults shows that consuming soy protein containing isoflavones 99 mg daily for 12 months does not improve hand grip strength or physical performance when compared with a milk protein placebo (75283). However, another small clinical study in older adults with low muscle mass living in China shows that taking soy, or a whey-soy blended protein, 16 grams daily for 6 months, slightly attenuates muscle loss when compared with no intervention (105603).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral soy improves outcomes and overall function in people who have had a stroke. Details: One small clinical study shows that older adults with a history of stroke who consumed soy milk 500 mL daily while participating in a rehabilitation program had greater improvements in hand grip strength, 8-feet walking speed, walking performance, and 6-minute walk test after 8 weeks when compared with placebo. However, consuming soy milk did not lead to greater improvements in lean mass or overall short physical performance battery (SPPB) scores when compared with placebo (100321).
• Thyroid cancer. It is unclear if dietary soy reduces the risk for thyroid cancer. Details: Epidemiological research has found that high dietary intake of soy is associated with a reduced risk of thyroid cancer when compared with lower intake (7662,12041).
• Vaginal atrophy. It is unclear if topical soy improves vaginal atrophy. Details: A small clinical study in postmenopausal adults with vaginal atrophy shows that applying one gram of soy extract 4% vaginal gel daily for 12 weeks reduces vaginal dryness and pain during sexual intercourse and improves vaginal endometrial thickness when compared with placebo (90964).
• Wrinkled skin. Small studies suggest that oral and topical soy might reduce wrinkles. Details: A small clinical study in middle-aged females shows that consuming soy isoflavone 40 mg daily for 12 weeks improves skin elasticity and the appearance of fine wrinkles when compared with placebo (75388). Another small clinical study in females with photodamaged skin shows that applying a soy moisturizer containing soybean trypsin inhibitor and Bowman-Birk protease inhibitor (Aveeno Positively Radiant Daily Moisturizer, Johnson & Johnson CCI) twice daily for 12 weeks improves skin pigmentation, fine lines, texture, tone, and appearance when compared with a placebo moisturizer (75410). More evidence is needed to rate soy for these uses.

(Read more about SOY)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (7555,12928,12946,95817). However, excessive doses should be avoided. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: Age 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51+ years, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stone, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). Also, advise patients taking calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D (93533).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. The National Academy of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51 years and older, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients to not consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). Also, advise patients taking calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D (93533).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (17506).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (945,1586,3263,3264,17506). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prescribing oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancy to those with low dietary calcium intake to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the same daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age independent of pregnancy status: 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg (17506). Doses over these amounts might increase the risk of neonatal hypocalcemia-induced seizures possibly caused by transient neonatal hypoparathyroidism in the setting of excessive calcium supplementation during pregnancy, especially during the third trimester. Neonatal hypocalcemia is a risk factor for neonatal seizures (97345).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately short-term (15). ...when sodium phosphate is used rectally and appropriately, no more than once every 24 hours, short-term (104471). Long-term use or high doses used orally or rectally require monitoring of serum electrolytes (2494,2495,2496,2497,2498,3092,112922). ...when used intravenously. Potassium phosphate is an FDA-approved prescription drug (15).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when phosphate (expressed as phosphorus) intake exceeds the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4 grams daily for adults under 70 years and 3 grams daily for adults older than 70. Hyperphosphatemia, resulting in electrolyte disturbances, alterations in calcium homeostasis, and calcification of nonskeletal tissues, may occur (7555). ...when used rectally more frequently than once every 24 hours, in excessive doses, with longer retention enema time, or in older patients with comorbidity or renal impairment (112922). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns that this may increase the risk of hyperphosphatemia, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalances leading to kidney and heart damage (104471).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately at recommended dietary allowances (RDAs). The daily RDAs are: children 1-3 years, 460 mg; children 4-8 years, 500 mg; males and females 9-18 years, 1250 mg (7555). ...when sodium phosphate is used rectally and appropriately, no more than once every 24 hours, short-term in children 2 years and older (104471). ...when used intravenously. Intravenous potassium phosphate is an FDA-approved prescription drug (15).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when phosphate (expressed as phosphorus) intake exceeds the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 3 grams daily for children 1-8 years of age and 4 grams daily for children 9 years and older. Hyperphosphatemia, resulting in electrolyte disturbances, alterations in calcium homeostasis, and calcification of nonskeletal tissues, may occur (7555). ...when sodium phosphate is used rectally more frequently than once every 24 hours, or in children under 2 years of age or with Hirchsprung disease (112922). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns that these uses may increase the risk of hyperphosphatemia, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalances leading to kidney and heart damage (104471).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately at the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) of 1250 mg daily for individuals 14-18 years of age and 700 mg daily for those over 18 years of age (7555). ...when sodium phosphate is used rectally and appropriately short-term (15). ...when used intravenously. Intravenous potassium phosphate is an FDA-approved prescription drug (15).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when phosphate (expressed as phosphorus) intake exceeds the tolerable upper intake level (UL). Hyperphosphatemia, resulting in electrolyte disturbances, alterations in calcium homeostasis, and calcification of nonskeletal tissues, may occur. The UL during pregnancy is 3.5 grams daily. During lactation, the UL is 4 grams daily (7555).

(Read more about PHOSPHATE SALTS)

LIKELY SAFE ...when soy protein is used orally and appropriately. Soy protein products in doses up to 60 grams, providing up to 185 mg isoflavones, daily have been safely used in studies lasting up to 16 weeks (842,2293,2294,2296,3025,3402,3977,4755,6412,8530)(10372,11805).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when soy extracts are used orally and appropriately, short-term. Soy extracts containing concentrated isoflavones in doses of 35-120 mg daily have been used with apparent safety for up to 6 months (4751,6455,7802,12040,12048,13209,95994,95999).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when consumed in amounts commonly found in foods or as a component of infant formula (3400,4912,7331). Soy milk that's not designed for infants should not be used as a substitute for infant formula. Regular soy milk can lead to nutrient deficiencies (12045). Most evidence shows that exposure to soy formula or other soy products in infancy does not cause early onset of puberty or health or reproductive problems later in life (7331,11080,108245). However, some small cohort studies have suggested that higher soy intake during childhood may be associated with an increased risk of precocious puberty (108240) and may be weakly correlated with the development of breasts in children less than 2 years of age (75520). This is in contrast to an observational study in Chinese children ages 7-9 years which suggests that higher soy intake is associated with delayed puberty (108252). One small cohort study has also found that use of soy infant formula may be associated with an increased risk of endometriosis in adulthood, although endometriosis was also correlated with prematurity, which may have confounded the findings (101803).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally as an alternative to cow's milk in children with severe milk allergy (75359). Although soy protein-based infant formulas are often promoted for children with milk allergy, children with a severe allergy to cow's milk are also frequently sensitive to soy protein (9883). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of soy products when used in amounts higher than typical food quantities for children.

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (4912).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in medicinal amounts. Soy contains mildly estrogenic constituents (3373,3988,3989,3990,3994,6029,75303). Theoretically, therapeutic use of soy might adversely affect fetal development; avoid using.

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (4912). A single 20-gram dose of roasted soybeans, containing 37 mg isoflavones, produces four to six times less isoflavones in breast milk than provided in a soy-based infant formula (2290). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of long-term use of therapeutic amounts of soy during lactation.

(Read more about SOY)

ALUMINUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium citrate might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity. Other types of calcium do not increase aluminum absorption.  Details Calcium citrate can increase the absorption of aluminum when taken with aluminum hydroxide. The increase in aluminum levels may become toxic, particularly in individuals with kidney disease (21631). However, the effect of calcium citrate on aluminum absorption is due to the citrate anion rather than calcium cation. Calcium acetate does not appear to increase aluminum absorption (93006).

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.  Details Advise patients to take bisphosphonates at least 30 minutes before calcium, but preferably at a different time of day. Calcium supplements decrease absorption of bisphosphonates (12937).

CALCIPOTRIENE (Dovonex) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Taking calcipotriene with calcium might increase the risk for hypercalcemia.  Details Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (12938). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with calcium supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Intravenous calcium may decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers; oral calcium is unlikely to have this effect.  Details Intravenous calcium is used to decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers in the management of overdose. Intravenous calcium gluconate has been used before intravenous verapamil (Isoptin) to prevent or reduce the hypotensive effects without affecting the antiarrhythmic effects (6124). But there is no evidence that dietary or supplemental calcium when taken orally interacts with calcium channel blockers (12939,12947).

CEFTRIAXONE (Rocephin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Co-administration of intravenous calcium and ceftriaxone can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys.  Details Avoid administering intravenous calcium in any form, such as parenteral nutrition or Lactated Ringers, within 48 hours of intravenous ceftriaxone. Case reports in neonates show that administering intravenous ceftriaxone and calcium can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys. In several cases, neonates have died as a result of this interaction (15794,21632). So far there are no reports in adults; however, there is still concern that this interaction might occur in adults.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Using intravenous calcium with digoxin might increase the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias.  Details Hypercalcemia increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with digoxin (12940). However, one retrospective analysis of clinical data suggests that intravenous calcium does not increase the risk of dysrhythmias or mortality in patients receiving digoxin (38960).

DILTIAZEM (Cardizem, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, calcium might increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of diltiazem.

DOLUTEGRAVIR (Tivicay) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of dolutegravir.  Details Advise patients to take dolutegravir either 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium carbonate 1200 mg concomitantly with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces plasma levels of dolutegravir by almost 40%. Calcium appears to decrease levels of dolutegravir through chelation (93578).

ELVITEGRAVIR (Vitekta) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of elvitegravir.  Details Advise patients to take elvitegravir either 2 hours before or 2 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium along with elvitegravir can reduce blood levels of elvitegravir through chelation (94166).

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption and effectiveness of levothyroxine.  Details Advise patients to take levothyroxine and calcium supplements at least 4 hours apart. Calcium reduces levothyroxine absorption, probably by forming insoluble complexes (5082). Calcium carbonate supplements reduce effectiveness of levothyroxine in patients with hypothyroidism (5081,5082,6137).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use of calcium and lithium may increase this risk of hypercalcemia.  Details Clinical research suggests that long-term use of lithium may cause hypercalcemia in 10% to 60% of patients (38953). Theoretically, concomitant use of lithium and calcium supplements may further increase this risk.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of quinolone antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral quinolones at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements or calcium-fortified foods. Taking calcium at the same time as oral quinolones can reduce quinolone absorption. Calcium binds to quinolones in the gut (4412,10339,21638,38570).

RALTEGRAVIR (Isentress) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium may reduce levels of raltegravir.  Details Pharmacokinetic research shows that taking a single dose of calcium carbonate 3000 mg along with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily modestly decreases the mean area under the curve of raltegravir, but the decrease does not necessitate a dose adjustment of raltegravir (94164). However, a case of elevated HIV-1 RNA levels and documented resistance to raltegravir has been reported for a patient taking calcium carbonate 1 gram three times daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU three times daily in combination with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 11 months. It is thought that calcium reduced raltegravir levels by chelation, leading to treatment failure (94165).

SOTALOL (Betapace) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of sotalol.  Details Advise patients to separate doses by at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium. Calcium appears to reduce the absorption of sotalol, probably by forming insoluble complexes (10018).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral tetracyclines at least 2 hours before, or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements. Taking calcium at the same time as oral tetracyclines can reduce tetracycline absorption. Calcium binds to tetracyclines in the gut (1843).

THIAZIDE DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Taking calcium along with thiazides might increase the risk of hypercalcemia and renal failure.  Details Thiazides reduce calcium excretion by the kidneys (1902). Using thiazides along with moderately large amounts of calcium carbonate increases the risk of milk-alkali syndrome (hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis, renal failure). Patients may need to have their serum calcium levels and/or parathyroid function monitored regularly.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, use of calcium supplements may increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of verapamil.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking phosphate salts with bisphosphonates might increase the risk of hypocalcemia.  Details Combining bisphosphonates and phosphate can cause hypocalcemia. In one report, hypocalcemic tetany developed in a patient taking alendronate (Fosamax) who received a large dose of phosphate salts as a pre-operative laxative (14589).

ERDAFITINIB (Balversa) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = A Taking erdafitinib with phosphate salts increases the risk of hyperphosphatemia.  Details Erdafitinib increases phosphate levels. It is recommended that patients taking erdafitinib restrict phosphate intake to no more than 600-800 mg daily (104470).

FUTIBATINIB (Lytgobi) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = A Taking futibatinib with phosphate salts increases the risk of hyperphosphatemia.  Details Futibatinib can cause hyperphosphatemia, as reported in 88% of patients in clinical studies. In addition, 77% of patients in clinical studies required use of a phosphate binder to manage hyperphosphatemia. Phosphate salts should generally be avoided by people taking this medication (112912).

(Read more about PHOSPHATE SALTS)

ANTIBIOTIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, antibiotics may decrease the activity of soy isoflavones.  Details Intestinal bacteria are responsible in part for converting soy isoflavones into their active forms. Antibiotics may decrease the amount of intestinal bacteria and decrease its ability to convert isoflavones (7657).

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = A Soy can lower blood glucose and have additive effects with antidiabetes drugs.  Details Clinical research shows that whole soy diets and soy-based meals reduce fasting glucose levels in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals (75268,75296,75378,75493,96001). Also, individuals following a soy-based meal replacement plan seem to require lower doses of sulfonylureas and metformin to manage blood glucose levels when compared with individuals following a diet plan recommended by the American Diabetes Association (75268).

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = A Theoretically soy protein may have additive effects with antihypertensive drugs and increase the risk of hypotension.  Details Although some contradictory research exists (14254), most clinical evidence suggests that consuming soy protein modestly reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure in individuals with prehypertension or hypertension (13139,75482).

CAFFEINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, soy might reduce the clearance of caffeine.  Details Soy contains genistein. Taking genistein 1 gram daily for 14 days seems to inhibit caffeine clearance and metabolism in healthy females (23582). This effect has been attributed to inhibition of the cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) enzyme, which is involved in caffeine metabolism. It is unclear if this effect occurs with the lower amounts of genistein found in soy.

CYTOCHROME P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Soy might modestly induce CYP2C9 enzymes. However, this effect does not seem to be clinically significant.  Details In vitro research suggests that an unhydrolyzed soy extract might induce CYP2C9. However, the significance of this interaction is likely minimal. In healthy females taking a specific extract of soy (Genistein Soy Complex, Source Naturals), blood levels of losartan, a CYP2C9 substrate, were not significantly affected (16825).

DIURETIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, soy might have additive effects when used with diuretic drugs.  Details Animal research suggests that genistein, a soy isoflavone, increases diuresis within 6 hours of subcutaneous administration in rats. The effects seem to be similar to those of furosemide (75604). This effect has not been reported in humans.

ESTROGENS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, soy might competitively inhibit the effects of estrogen replacement therapy.  Details Soy contains phytoestrogens and has been shown to have estrogenic activity in some patients (3860). Although this has not been demonstrated in humans, theoretically, concomitant use of soy with estrogen replacement therapy might reduce the effects of the estrogen replacement therapy.

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Soy products might reduce the absorption of levothyroxine in some patients.  Details Preliminary clinical research and a case report suggest that soy-based formulas inhibit the absorption of levothyroxine in infants with congenital hypothyroidism (20636,20637,75548,90959). A levothyroxine dosage increase may be needed for infants with congenital hypothyroidism while using soy-based formulas, and the dose may need to be reduced when soy-based formulas are no longer administered. However, in postmenopausal adults, clinical research shows that taking a single dose of soy extract containing isoflavones 60 mg along with levothyroxine does not affect the oral bioavailability of levothyroxine (95996).

MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITORS (MAOIs) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Taking soy products containing high amounts of tyramine along with MAOIs can increase the risk of hypertensive crisis.  Details Fermented soy products such as tofu and soy sauce contain tyramine, a naturally occurring chemical that affects blood pressure regulation. The metabolism of tyramine is decreased by MAOIs. Consuming more than 6 mg of tyramine while taking an MAOI can increase the risk of hypertensive crisis (15649). The amount of tyramine in fermented soy products is usually less than 0.6 mg per serving; however, there can be significant variation depending on the specific product used, storage conditions, and length of storage. Storing one brand of tofu for a week can increase tyramine content from 0.23 mg to 4.8 mg per serving (15649,15701,15702). Advise patients taking MAOIs to avoid fermented soy products that contain high amounts of tyramine.

PROGESTERONE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = A Theoretically, combining soy isoflavones with transdermal progesterone may worsen bone density.  Details Clinical research suggests that significant bone loss may occur in females with osteoporosis who receive a combination of transdermal progesterone with soy milk containing isoflavones when compared with placebo, soy milk alone, or progesterone alone (69859).

TAMOXIFEN (Nolvadex) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, estrogenic soy isoflavones might alter the effects of tamoxifen.  Details Laboratory research suggests that genistein and daidzen, isoflavones from soy, can antagonize the antitumor effects of tamoxifen under some circumstances (7072,14362,8966); however, soy isoflavones might have different effects when used at different doses. A relatively low in vitro concentration of soy isoflavones such as 1 microM/L seems to interfere with tamoxifen, whereas high in vitro concentrations such as those >10 microM/L might actually enhance tamoxifen effects. People on a high-soy diet have soy isoflavones levels ranging from 0.1-6 microM/L. Until more is known, advise patients taking tamoxifen to avoid therapeutic use of soy products.

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, soy might interfere with the effects of warfarin.  Details Soy milk has been reported to decrease the international normalized ratio (INR) in a patient taking warfarin. The mechanism of this interaction is not known (9672). However, animal and in vitro research suggests that soy may also inhibit platelet aggregation (3992). Dosing adjustments for warfarin may be necessary.

(Read more about SOY)

General ...Orally and intravenously, calcium is well-tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Belching, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, and stomach upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about calciphylaxis and kidney stones.

Cardiovascular ...There has been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these results, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and CVD, CHD, or MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482). To minimize the possible risk of CVD, CHD, or MI, advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). While dietary intake of calcium is preferred over supplemental intake, advise patients who require calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D, as this combination does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI (93533).
Rarely, calcium intake can increase the risk of calciphylaxis, which usually occurs in patients with kidney failure. Calciphylaxis is the deposition of calcium phosphate in arterioles, which causes skin ulcers and skin necrosis. In a case report, a 64-year-old female with a history of neck fracture, sepsis, and ischemic colitis presented with painful leg ulcers due to calciphylaxis. She discontinued calcium and vitamin D supplementation and was treated with sodium thiosulfate and supportive care (95816).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, calcium can cause belching, flatulence, nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, and diarrhea (1824,1843,12950,38803). Although constipation is frequently cited as an adverse effect of calcium, there is no scientific substantiation of this side effect (1824,1843,1844,1845,12950,38978). Calcium carbonate has been reported to cause acid rebound, but this is controversial (12935,12936).

Oncologic ...There is some concern that very high doses of calcium might increase the risk of prostate cancer. Some epidemiological evidence suggests that consuming over 2000 mg/day of dietary calcium might increase the risk for prostate cancer (4825,12949). Additional research suggests that calcium intake over 1500 mg/day might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer and prostate cancer mortality (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a small increase in prostate cancer risk (98894). However, contradictory research suggests no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall prostate cancer risk (14131,14132,104630). More evidence is needed to determine the effect of calcium, if any, on prostate cancer risk.

Renal ...Kidney stones have been reported in individuals taking calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily in combination with vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 4 years (93943).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

General ...Orally, intravenously, and rectally, phosphate salts are generally well tolerated when used appropriately and/or as prescribed.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, anal irritation, bloating, diarrhea, headache, gastrointestinal irritation, hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia, malaise, nausea, sleep disturbance, and vomiting.
Rectally: Hyperphosphatemia and hypocalcemia.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Extraskeletal calcification.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, a case of allergic acute coronary syndrome e., Kounis syndrome) is reported in a 43-year-old female after ingesting a specific sodium phosphate laxative product (Travad oral). She presented with maculopapular rash that progressed to anaphylaxis and a non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. The patient recovered after hospitalization for 3 days with medical management (112894).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, phosphate salts can cause gastrointestinal irritation, nausea, abdominal pain, bloating, anal irritation, and vomiting (15,2494,2495,2496,2497,93846,93848,93850,93851,93853,107008). Sodium and potassium phosphates can cause diarrhea (15). Aluminum phosphate can cause constipation (15). A large comparative study shows that, when taken orally as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy, sodium phosphate is associated with gastric mucosal lesions in about 4% of patients (93868).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, phosphate salts can commonly cause malaise (93846). Headaches and sleep disturbance may also occur (93848,93851).

Renal ...Orally, use of sodium phosphate for bowel cleansing has been associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury in some patients (93863). However, a pooled analysis of clinical research suggests that results are not consistent for all patients (93864). Some evidence suggests that female gender, probably due to lower body weight, iron-deficiency anemia, dehydration, and chronic kidney disease are all associated with an increased risk of sodium phosphate-induced kidney dysfunction (93865).

Other ...Orally, phosphate salts can cause fluid and electrolyte disturbances including hyperphosphatemia and hypocalcemia, and extraskeletal calcification. Potassium phosphates can cause hyperkalemia. Sodium phosphates can cause hypernatremia and hypokalemia (15,2494,2495,2496,2497,107008).
Rectally, phosphate salts can cause fluid and electrolyte disturbances including hyperphosphatemia and hypocalcemia (15,112922).
Deaths related to intake of oral or rectal phosphate salts are rare and most have occurred in infants and are related to overdose (93866). However, death has also been reported in elderly patients using sodium phosphate enemas, mainly at standard doses of 250 mL (93867).

(Read more about PHOSPHATE SALTS)

General ...Orally, soy is well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Bloating, constipation, diarrhea, and nausea.
All ROAs: Allergic reactions.

Endocrine ...In the 1950s and 1960s, cases of altered thyroid function, particularly goiter, were reported in children taking soy formula. However, adding iodine to soy formula or replacing soy flour in formula with soy protein isolate has nearly eliminated the risk of altered thyroid function in most infants (75353,75651).
In adults, there is some evidence that soy intake can alter thyroid function. Results from one clinical trial suggests that consuming soybeans 30 grams daily for as little as one month can increase thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and decrease thyroxine, causing diffuse goiters, constipation, fatigue, and lethargy in some Japanese men. Recovery was achieved by discontinuing soybean intake (75206,75353). There is also some evidence that soy inhibits thyroid hormone synthesis resulting in increased secretion of TSH in some postmenopausal patients (7806). However, this seems to only occur in people with iodine deficiency (6466,75311). In postmenopausal patients with normal levels of iodine, taking a soy extract for 6 months does not seem to significantly affect thyroid hormone levels (13010).
Evidence from a single case-control study suggests that consumption of soy-based formulas may be associated with an observed three-fold increase in the risk of breast development in Puerto Rican children less than 2 years-old (75520). The correlation has been attributed to the estrogenic activity of soy. However, other risk factors, including a maternal history of ovarian cysts and consumption of meat products were also associated with the increased risk of breast development prior to 2 years of age. Also, the investigators noted that in over half of the cases, the child had not been exposed to soy or any of the other risk factors. Therefore, factors other than soy consumption may be more strongly associated with the increased risk of breast development prior to 2 years of age.

Gastrointestinal ...Gastrointestinal upset, such as constipation, diarrhea, bloating, and nausea are the most common side effects of soy (2297,11033,11082,15851,75491,95999). Reports of "bad taste" and taste intolerance have also been documented in clinical research (15851,39007,75491). Firmer stools, diarrhea, colitis, and intestinal mucosal damage has been reported in infants fed soy protein formula (75161,75448,75516,75525).

Genitourinary ...Orally, soy might increase discomfort during menstrual periods. Evidence from a small, retrospective cohort study has found that consuming soy formula as an infant may slightly increase the duration and discomfort of menstrual periods later in life. However, the investigators noted that these differences may not be clinically significant (7331).
Orally, frequent soy consumption might be a risk factor for uterine leiomyoma, an estrogen-dependent benign tumor located on the uterus. Observational research found that consumption of soy milk or soybean at least four times weekly is associated with a 7-fold increased odds of uterine leiomyoma (98869).
There is some concern that use of soy-based formulas in infants might result in long-term health complications. However, results from a retrospective cohort study has found that intake of soy-based formula as an infant does not affect height, weight, body mass index, pubertal maturation, menstrual history, or pregnancy history, nor does it increase the risk of reproductive organ disorders, hormonal disorders, libido dysfunction, or birth defects in the offspring of adults who received soy formula as infants (7331,11080). Additionally, research in adults shows that urinary phytoestrogens are not associated with endometriosis risk (101804). However, some population research has found that regular exposure to soy-based formulas during infancy is associated with an increased risk for endometriosis (101803).

Immunologic ...Orally, soy can cause allergic reactions such as skin rash and itching in some people (6412). In an 11-year-old female, allergy to soy protein resulting in a delayed itching papular rash was thought to be responsible for the reaction to injected benzathine benzylpenicillin containing possible soy protein-contaminated soy lecithin (96422).
Topically, soy-based ingredients were responsible for the development of hand atopic dermatitis in a young female using cosmetic lotions in the workplace. Percutaneous sensitization resulted in the development of anaphylaxis to oral soy (96000).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, one clinical study showed that insomnia was more common in postmenopausal adults taking soy isoflavone supplements when compared with those receiving placebo (9917). Some research suggests that dietary consumption of tofu during midlife might decrease cognitive function in later years. Evidence from one retrospective cohort study suggests that males who consume at least two servings of tofu weekly during midlife have increased risk of cognitive impairment in late life (19% vs. 4%) compared to those who consume tofu less frequently. Although the effect of tofu was considered to be marginal compared to other factors such as age, education, or history of stroke, results from the study suggest that the effect of significant midlife consumption of tofu is comparable to the effect of an age difference of 4 years or an education difference of 3 years. However, numerous other factors, such as lifestyle and health, could be involved (6415,6416). Therefore, these findings are too preliminary to be used as a basis for clinical recommendations.

Oncologic ...There is controversy about the role of soy in breast cancer. Population studies suggest that soy is protective against breast cancer. Asian females who eat a traditional diet high in soy seem to have a lower risk of developing breast cancer (4590,5939,9674). Early exploratory studies have suggested that soy stimulates proliferation of normal human breast tissue (3980,3981). However, taking a soy tablet containing 50 mg soy isoflavones daily for 12 months does not alter mammographic or breast MRI tissue density in adults at high risk of breast cancer, with non-endocrine treated breast cancer, or previously treated for breast cancer and without evidence of recurrence (95999).
There is some concern that soy supplements, but not soy foods, might increase the risk of endometrial hyperplasia due to its estrogenic effects. Population and clinical research suggests that soy foods do not have a proliferative effect on endometrial cells (7358,2429,7654,9676,9917), and increased dietary soy and phytoestrogens are associated with reduced endometrial cancer risk (7338,10372). However, the effects seem to be different with concentrated soy isoflavone extract. While taking products providing isoflavones 120 mg daily for 6 months does not increase endometrial thickening (13209), taking higher doses such as isoflavones 150 mg daily for 5 years might increase the risk of simple endometrial hyperplasia (12105). However, there is no evidence that soy isoflavones increase the risk of atypical hyperplasia which has a much higher risk of developing into endometrial cancer than simple endometrial hyperplasia (12105,90973).
There is also concern that increased soy intake increases the risk for other types of cancer. Some observational research has found that higher dietary intake of soy is associated with a higher risk for bladder cancer and pancreatic cancer (9677,105609).
A meta-analysis of results from cohort and case-control studies evaluating the risk of stomach cancer related to consumption of fermented soy products is unclear and inconclusive. The highest quality data from cohort studies suggests that these products have no significant effect on stomach cancer (7340,7341). More research is required to determine if soy products have any correlation with stomach cancer.

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Inhaled soy dust and soy hull aeroallergen can trigger symptoms of asthma and allergic rhinitis (5084,5085,5086).

(Read more about SOY)