Women's Multi [Discontinued] by Garden Of Life MyKind Organics

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Athletic performance. Preliminary clinical research in adult male athletes shows that taking a specific supplement containing annatto powder 143 mg and ginger powder 190 mg (ReWin(d), Natural Origins), 6 capsules daily, increases muscle power during repeat eccentric exercise when compared with placebo. The supplement was taken for 4 weeks prior to, and 3 days after, the eccentric exercise (105505). Another small clinical trial in male recreational runners aged 40-60 years with chronic knee discomfort shows that taking a product containing annatto seed, devil's claw root, and ginger rhizome in a ratio of 0.375:1:0.75 (Exten(d), Natural Origins), 2 grams orally daily in 3 divided doses for 4 weeks, reduces leg fat mass when compared with placebo (109548). It is unclear if knee discomfort is improved, or whether the effects are due to annatto, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Preliminary clinical research in adults with BPH and moderate lower urinary tract symptoms shows that taking powdered annatto leaf 250 mg three times daily for 12 months does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (31612).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Preliminary clinical research in adult male athletes shows that taking a specific supplement containing annatto powder 143 mg and ginger powder 190 mg (ReWin(d), Natural Origins), 6 capsules daily, reduces muscle soreness after eccentric exercise when compared with placebo. However, blood creatine kinase levels were not different between groups. The supplement was taken for 4 weeks prior to, and 3 days after, the eccentric exercise (105505).
• Halitosis. Preliminary clinical research in adults with halitosis shows that applying annatto extract 20% to the tongue as a photosensitizer for antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) immediately reduces volatile sulfur levels in the mouth when compared with baseline. However, after 7 days, volatile sulfur levels were similar to baseline levels. The changes in volatile sulfur levels were similar to those treated with tongue scraping or tongue scraping followed by aPDT. However, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (105504). More evidence is needed to rate annatto for these uses.

(Read more about ANNATTO)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if apple juice consumption is beneficial in patients with Alzheimer disease. Details: A small clinical study in adults with moderate to severe Alzheimer disease shows that drinking 4 ounces of apple juice twice daily for one month does not improve cognitive function when compared with baseline. However, according to caregiver assessment, it seems to improve aspects of mood and behavior, such as anxiety, depression, apathy, delusion, and agitation, when compared with baseline (94422). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Cancer. It is unclear if apple consumption is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Some population research has found that eating one or more apples daily may be associated with a decreased risk of esophageal, colorectal, larynx, or breast cancer when compared with eating less than 1 apple daily (31688). Also, a case-control study in adults with lung cancer has found that increased apple consumption may be associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer (3470).
• Dental plaque. It is unclear if apple consumption is beneficial for reducing dental plaque. Details: A small clinical study in healthy patients shows that eating an apple is less effective for reducing plaque than brushing teeth. Eating an apple actually increases plaque when compared with baseline, although it decreases the measure of bacterial vitality (99447).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if consumption of powdered, dehydrated apple is beneficial in patients with type 2 diabetes. Details: A small clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that substituting 26-52 grams of white wheat flour in bread with powdered, dehydrated apple and consuming the bread daily for up to 4 weeks does not improve fasting blood glucose or postprandial glucose levels when compared with a low-fiber white bread control (13141).
• Diarrhea. It is unclear if apple juice consumption is beneficial in infants with severe diarrhea. Details: A clinical study in infants with severe diarrhea shows that drinking apple juice 15 mL/kg twice daily during episodes of diarrhea results in more fecal loss when compared with drinking water (31687).
• Metabolic syndrome. Although there has been interest in using apple for metabolic syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple for this purpose.
• Muscle strength. Oral apple extract has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effects when used alone is unclear. Details: Small clinical studies in resistance trained males show that taking a specific blend of ancient peat and apple extract (elevATP, VDF FutureCeuticals Inc.) 150 mg daily as a liquid with liposomes (QuSomes, BioZone Laboratories Inc.) for 12 weeks modestly increases lower body and total strength, improves lower body power output, and increases cross-sectional area of muscle when compared with placebo (94418,94419).
• Obesity. It is unclear if apple consumption is beneficial in patients with overweight or obesity. Details: A small clinical study in females with hypercholesterolemia and overweight or obesity shows that eating apples three times daily for 12 weeks is associated with weight loss of 1.2 kg, compared with weight loss of 0.9 kg in those consuming oat cookies (17997). More evidence is needed to rate apple for these uses.

(Read more about APPLE)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Although there is interest in using oral and topical asparagus for acne, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of asparagus for this condition.
• Cancer. Although there is interest in using oral asparagus for cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of asparagus for this condition.
• Constipation. Although there is interest in using oral asparagus for constipation, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of asparagus for this purpose.
• Intestinal parasite infection. Although there is interest in using oral asparagus for intestinal parasite infection, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of asparagus for this condition.
• Hypertension. Oral asparagus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with hypertension shows that taking a specific combination product (Asparagus-P, Grunwalder) containing asparagus root 6 grams and parsley leaf 6 grams daily for 6 weeks does not affect ambulatory blood pressure when compared with baseline (94940).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Although there is interest in using oral asparagus for kidney stones, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of asparagus for this condition.
• Obesity. Oral asparagus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Observational research in overweight adults shows that taking psyllium 2-3 tablespoons each morning with 1.5 liters of elderflower juice, plus tablets providing asparagus powder 2.7 grams, elderberry powder 225 mg, and elderflower extract 600 mg daily for 2 weeks, and replacing each meal on days 5-12 with 200 mL of elderberry and elderflower juice, is associated with an average 3.2 kg weight loss and a modest reduction in blood pressure when compared with baseline (94939). It is not known if these effects are due to asparagus, other ingredients, the combination, or fasting from regular food for 8 days. Furthermore, the validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although there is interest in using oral asparagus for RA, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of asparagus for this condition.
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Although there is interest in using oral asparagus for UTIs, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of asparagus for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate asparagus for these uses.

(Read more about ASPARAGUS)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral beet may improve athletic performance associated with aerobic activities. However, it is not clear who is most likely to benefit, for which type of competition it is most useful, or what dose or duration of use is most appropriate. Details: Several small clinical trials, most of which enrolled elite athletes, recreational athletes, and sedentary males, as well as meta-analyses of some of these and other studies, show that beet improves various measures of athletic performance, including ability, muscular endurance, power output, sprinting, and strength (93844,94464,94468,94469,100143,100150,100152,105761,113422). Clinical research also shows that drinking beetroot juice improves the use of oxygen during exercise testing in recreationally-trained athletes, especially with severe exercise testing (94460,94463,94467,100147,105762). Also, in obese adolescents, taking beetroot juice daily for 6 days increases the time to exhaustion from severe exercise, but does not improve moderate exercise (100145). Not all research shows that beet supplementation benefits athletic performance. Another meta-analysis of several small clinical studies, including some of the studies above, shows that taking beetroot does not improve performance in high-intensity or sprint interval training (111159). Additionally, the majority of research in elite athletes does not support the use of beetroot juice to decrease the time needed to complete a task, aid in some sort of graded exercise test, or improve the use of oxygen during exercise testing (94455,94458,94460,94461,94464,94465,94466,94469,94473,100142,100153,105763). The supposed lack of effect of beetroot juice in elite athletes might be related to the natural production of nitrates and nitrites in the body or the increased ability to use oxygen that comes from extensive training (94458,94463). Alternatively, any changes might be very small (<1%) and not identified with statistical comparisons, although even very small changes might be beneficial in competition (94464). The most commonly used doses in all studies, regardless of effect, have included an acute dose of beetroot juice 70-500 mL up to 3 hours prior to exercise (93844,94463,94464,94466,94467,94473,97726,100142,100143,105761)(105762,111159,113422) or chronic dosing of up to 500 mL daily for 3-6 days (94459,94464,94469,100145,100147,100153,111159,113422). Less commonly, beetroot juice 70-140 mL daily, betalain-rich concentrate 100 mg daily, or a beetroot-based nutritional gel 100 grams daily, have been taken for longer dosing schedules of 7-15 days (97720,100144,100148,100152,105763,113422). Benefits in elite athletes, most often related to time trials, are usually limited to studies using chronic dosing of 7-15 days, which is longer than the duration of 6 days used in the majority of studies (94473,97720,100144,100148). Brands of juice used in clinical trials have included Beet It Sport (James White Drinks Ltd.) (94455,94458,94465,100142,100143,100144,100148,105761,105763), Beet It Stamina Shot (James White Drinks Ltd.) (93844), Beet It (James White Drinks Ltd) (94457,94459,94460,94467,94469,97726,100145,100153,105762,111159), and Love Beets Beetroot Juice (Gs Fresh Ltd.) (94461,94462). Although plasma levels have not been analyzed in all studies, the majority of studies suggest that these doses are adequate to increase levels of nitrates or nitrites, which is thought to be essential for increasing athletic potential (93844,94455,94458,94459,94460,94465,94467,94469,94466,94473,97726). The evidence also suggests benefit in both normoxic and hypoxic environments (94465,100148,105763).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Drinking beetroot juice 7-8 times over 48 hours after strenuous exercise may reduce exercise-induced muscle soreness, but evidence is conflicting. Details: Some clinical research shows drinking beetroot juice (Love Beets Beetroot Juice, Gs Fresh Ltd.) 125 mL or 250 mL seven times over 48 hours after strenuous box jumps improves muscle soreness when compared with placebo and sodium nitrite (96964,97722). Other small clinical studies show that drinking beetroot juice 50-250 mL as eight separate doses over 48 hours after strenuous exerciseimproves muscle soreness and reduces tissue edema when compared with placebo (94461,113424). However, drinking beetroot juice 250 mL as seven separate doses over 48 hours after running a marathon does not appear to reduce muscle soreness when compared with placebo (94462). A meta-analysis of 4 small studies, mostly in healthy or physically active males, shows that drinking beetroot juice improves the pressure pain threshold, which is a measure of muscle soreness, at 48- and 72-hours post-exercise when compared with a fruit-flavored drink. However, beetroot juice does not improve subjective muscle soreness scores (111160). The validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the beetroot juice regimens among the included studies. Further, these results should not be generalized to elite athletes.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Drinking beetroot juice for up to 14 days may not improve exercise capacity in patients with COPD. Details: A meta-analysis of eight small clinical trials in patients with COPD shows that taking nitrate-rich beetroot juice does not improve most measures of exercise capacity, including the 6-minute walk test, cycling ergometry endurance time, and maximum rate of oxygen consumption (VO2 max), when compared with placebo. Additionally, beetroot juice did not reduce blood pressure or heart rate. However, the analysis did show a significant improvement in scores on the Borg Rating of Perceived Exhaustion scale with beetroot juice over placebo. Nitrate-rich beetroot juice doses ranged from 70-140 mL daily for up to 14 days (104200).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Cognitive function. It is unclear if drinking beetroot juice is beneficial for cognitive function. Details: A small clinical study in adults with overweight or obesity on a calorie-restricted diet shows that drinking 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice daily for 14 days improves the time to complete part B of the trail making test, which is a test of cognitive function, but not part A, when compared with controls (111158). However, the duration and size of this study limits its validity. Further, it is unclear whether any improvement is clinically significant. The effect of acute beet administration on cognitive function has also been studied. A very small clinical study in healthy adults shows that taking beet extract (RedNite, Enovate Biolife) chewable tablets 3 grams 90 minutes prior to neuropsychological testing improves immediate and delayed memory capacity, frontal lobe function, and lexical flexibility but does not improve working memory, information processing speed, or subjective reports of memory performance when compared with placebo (113427).
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). It is unclear if oral beetroot extract is beneficial in patients with CHD. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with CHD shows that taking red beetroot extract 500 mg, containing around 25 mg betalains, twice daily for 2 weeks reduces total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 15 mg/dL and reduces triglycerides by 8 mg/dL when compared to baseline. Slight improvements in blood pressure and blood glucose were also reported, but these changes were not clinically significant (103883). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Also, it is unclear whether beetroot can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with CHD.
• Dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral beetroot is beneficial in patients with dyslipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in healthy individuals or patients with dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease, or overweight or obesity, shows that consuming beetroot juice or leaves does not improve levels of triglycerides or total, low-density lipoprotein, or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol when compared with controls (111163). However, the validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the enrolled patients and beetroot regimens.
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice improves recovery from muscle damage after exercise. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 small clinical studies in healthy or physically active individuals, most of which enrolled males only, shows that drinking beetroot juice improves measures of muscle recovery at 72 hours post-exercise when compared with a fruit-flavored drink. However, beetroot juice does not consistently improve recovery at earlier time points post-exercise, nor does it reduce levels of creatine kinase or markers of inflammation (i.e., interleukin-6, interleukin-8, c-reactive protein, or tumor necrosis factor-alpha) (111160). However, the validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the beetroot juice regimens among the included studies, which usually varied from 210-250 mg of nitrate in 7-11 servings over 3-7 days. Further, these results should not be generalized to elite athletes. Another very small clinical study in semi-professional female athletes shows that ingesting beetroot juice 50 mL 8 times over 48 hours after exercise-induced muscle damage enhances the recovery of some functional parameters such as muscle endurance but not others such as flexibility and vertical jump performance when compared with placebo (113424).
• Hypertension. Oral beet may slightly reduce blood pressure in healthy individuals, but it is unclear if it is beneficial in patients with hypertension. Details: Meta-analyses of small studies show the potential for a minor reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in healthy adults taking beetroot juice (94470,97718,97728). The average reduction in SBP and DBP with beetroot juice consumption is about 4 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, which is greater than the effect seen with consuming blackcurrant juice or nitrate-depleted beetroot juice. The most benefit is seen when beetroot juice is taken for at least 2 weeks or at doses of 500 mL daily (97728). The effect of acute beet supplementation on blood pressure is conflicting. A small clinical study in healthy adults shows that drinking beet juice (Beet It, James White Company) 140 mL two hours prior to cardiovascular measurements reduces resting SBP by about 4 mmHg but does not improve resting or post-exercise DBP, central blood pressure, or arterial stiffness nor does it improve post-exercise SBP when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis suggests that the reductions in resting SBP were only observed in males, not females (113423). Another small clinical study shows that consuming beet 100 grams baked into bread modestly decreases DBP over a 6-hour period when compared with white bread (97725). It is possible that genetics might play a role in the magnitude of effect seen with beetroot consumption. Adults with a specific gene polymorphism, eNOS Glu298Asp, experienced a greater reduction in DBP after consuming beet-containing bread (97724). Despite positive findings in studies of healthy individuals, research on the use of beetroot juice in patients with hypertension is unclear. A small clinical study in adults with hypertension who were taking antihypertensive medications shows that drinking nitrate-rich beetroot juice (Beet it; James White Drinks Ltd.) 70 mL twice daily for one week does not lower blood pressure when compared with nitrate-depleted beetroot juice (94457). Also, in patients with mild to moderate hypertension, clinical research shows that taking a combination of beetroot powder (Sensient) 300 mg, olive leaf extract 1000 mg, and green coffee bean extract 200 mg daily for 6 weeks does not lower blood pressure when compared with placebo (97723). However, some evidence suggests that at least part of the blood pressure lowering effects of beet might be independent of nitrate (97728). Furthermore, some research suggests that identifying effects on blood pressure might be dependent on the method of measurement, including clinic resting measurements, 24-hour monitoring, or morning/evening home resting measurements (97729).
• Hypertriglyceridemia. It is unclear if oral beet is beneficial in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Details: A small clinical study in overweight or obese individuals with dyslipidemia shows that taking freeze-dried beet leaf 2.8 grams daily for 4 weeks in addition to nutritional guidance does not lower triglyceride levels when compared with nutritional guidance alone (100146). Beet has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical trial in patients at risk for heart disease shows that a specific combination of beet and hawthorn berry (Neo40-Daily, Neogenis Labs), taken twice daily for 30 days, can modestly reduce blood triglyceride levels when compared to baseline (18222). It is unclear if these findings are due to beet, hawthorn berry, or the combination.
• Liver disease. Although there has been interest in using oral beet for liver disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of beet for this purpose.
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial for muscle strength. Details: A meta-analysis of 18 clinical studies in healthy males shows that taking beetroot juice or beetroot gel 2-3 hours before exercise improves muscular strength when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis suggests that beetroot-based supplements improve muscular strength in a fatigued but not resting state (113422). A small clinical study in adults with overweight or obesity on a calorie-restricted diet shows that drinking 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice daily for 14 days improves handgrip strength by approximately 18% compared with 4% in controls (111158). However, it is unclear whether any improvement is clinically significant.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral beet leaf or beetroot juice is beneficial for weight loss. Details: A small clinical study in patients with overweight or obesity and dyslipidemia shows that taking freeze-dried beet leaf 2.8 grams daily for 4 weeks in addition to nutritional guidance does not reduce body weight or body mass index (BMI) when compared with nutritional guidance alone (100146). Similarly, a small clinical study in adults with overweight or obesity on a calorie-restricted diet shows that drinking 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice daily for 14 days does not improve weight loss when compared with controls (111158). However, the size and duration of this study may have been inadequate to detect differences between groups.
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension. Details: A small clinical trial in pregnant patients with hypertension who are at approximately 22-35 weeks gestation shows that taking beetroot juice (James White Drinks Ltd) 70 mL daily for 8 days does not reduce blood pressure when compared with a nitrate-depleted beetroot juice (100151). However, the study was small and designed to investigate the feasibility of using beetroot juice in this population.
• Pulmonary hypertension. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking beetroot juice (Beet-It Sport; James White Drinks Ltd) 70 mL twice daily for 7 days does not improve right ventricular systolic function when compared with nitrate-depleted beetroot juice in patients with pulmonary hypertension (100149). However, this study was small and not adequately powered to detect differences between groups.
• Raynaud syndrome. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial in patients with Raynaud syndrome. Details: A small clinical study in patients with Raynaud syndrome undergoing cold sensitivity tests shows that drinking beetroot juice (Beet-It, James White Drinks Ltd) 70 mL daily for 13 days, followed by 140 mL prior to testing, does not reduce pain in the hands or feet, but might improve thermal comfort in the feet, when compared to baseline (103884). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. More evidence is needed to rate beet for these uses.

(Read more about BEET)

EFFECTIVE

• Erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP). Oral beta-carotene reduces photosensitivity in patients with EPP. Details: Oral beta-carotene can reduce photosensitivity in patients with EPP, a genetic disorder resulting in defective porphyrin metabolism. In adults, beta-carotene 180-300 mg daily is used. In children 1-4 years old, the daily dose is 60-90 mg; 5-8 years, 90-120 mg; 9-12 years, 120-150 mg; 13-16 years, 150-180 mg; and 16 and older, 180 mg. If an adequate response is not obtained, beta-carotene can be increased by 30-60 mg per day for children under 16 years, and up to a maximum of 300 mg per day for children 16 years and older (11793,34455,34646,34651,34652,34653,34673).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. A diet rich in beta-carotene modestly reduces breast cancer risk. Details: Observational research has found that a diet rich in beta-carotene is associated with reduced risk of breast cancer in premenopausal adults, especially those at high risk due to family history or high alcohol intake (1444,10132). Other observational research has also found that increased beta-carotene intake is associated with up to an 18% decreased risk of breast cancer and up to a 30% increased overall survival in breast cancer patients (10824,101697).
• Postpartum complications. Taking beta carotene orally seems to reduce the occurrence of postpartum diarrhea, fever, night blindness, and mortality in malnourished patients. Details: A large clinical study in pregnant patients in Nepal shows that taking all-trans beta-carotene (synthetic beta-carotene) 42 mg weekly before, during, and after pregnancy reduces, but does not eliminate, the occurrence of postpartum diarrhea, fever, and night blindness when compared with placebo (2581). Further clinical studies in pregnant patients in Nepal show that taking the same dose of all-trans beta-carotene seems to reduce pregnancy-related mortality, but not fetal and early infant mortality, when compared with placebo (6152,6153,6154).
• Sunburn. Oral beta-carotene seems to modestly reduce the risk for sunburn in sensitive individuals. Details: A meta-analysis of multiple clinical studies suggests that beta-carotene must be taken for at least 10 weeks to have a protective effect against sunburn (34562). There is also some evidence that taking beta-carotene 25 mg, alone or as a mixture of beta-carotenoids, daily for 12 weeks reduces skin redness after exposure to UV light in sun-sensitive individuals (6134,34496). However, beta-carotene is unlikely to have much effect on sunburn risk in most people (11792). Also, it does not seem to reduce the incidence of solar keratoses or skin cancers associated with sun exposure (1297,2599,11302).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Aneurysm. Oral beta-carotene does not seem to reduce abdominal aneurysm risk. Details: Clinical research shows that taking beta-carotene 20 mg daily does not reduce the incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in male smokers when compared to patients not taking beta-carotene after a follow-up period of 5.8 years (34462).
• Alzheimer disease. Oral beta-carotene does not seem to reduce Alzheimer disease risk. Details: Most research suggests that intake of dietary or supplemental beta-carotene does not seem to have any effect on Alzheimer disease risk (10131,34597,34624,90082).
• Cataracts. Oral beta-carotene supplements do not seem to reduce the risk of cataract development. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that the highest DIETARY intake of beta-carotene is associated with a modest 7% to 10% reduction in the risk of cataracts (90786,101699). However, taking beta-carotene SUPPLEMENTS does not seem to reduce the risk of cataracts. Clinical research and meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking beta-carotene alone or in combination with vitamin C, vitamin E, and zinc for up to 8 years does not reduce the incidence of cataracts or the need for cataract surgery (7304,34626,101699).
• Cystic fibrosis. Oral beta-carotene does not seem to improve lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical studies in patients with cystic fibrosis shows that taking beta-carotene orally 10-300 mg daily for up to 14 months does not improve lung function when compared with control (34605).
• Diabetes. Oral beta-carotene does not seem to reduce the risk of developing diabetes or diabetic complications. Details: Observational research has found inconsistent results regarding an association between dietary beta-carotene and the risk of developing type 2 diabetes (14004,34576,107292). However, one population study in patients with type 2 diabetes has found that an increased serum concentration of beta-carotene is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality over 14 years, with a 2.5-fold increased risk when the highest levels are compared with the lowest (109768). Additionally, clinical research has been negative. One clinical study in females with a history of cardiovascular disease shows that taking beta-carotene 50 mg on alternate days does not prevent the development of type 2 diabetes when compared with placebo (34588). Another clinical study in males diagnosed with diabetes shows that taking beta-carotene 20 mg daily does not reduce the risk of macrovascular complications or mortality when compared with those not taking beta-carotene (34593).
• Dysplastic nevi (atypical moles). Oral beta-carotene does not seem to reduce atypical moles. Details: Clinical research in patients with numerous atypical moles shows that taking beta-carotene orally 50 mg daily for 36 months does not reduce the occurrence of newly developed moles when compared with placebo (34503).
• Esophageal cancer. Oral beta-carotene does not seem to reduce esophageal cancer risk. Details: While observational research suggests that consuming more beta-carotene in the diet reduces esophageal cancer, higher quality research does not agree (103675). Clinical research shows that taking beta-carotene and alpha-tocopherol supplements for 5-8 years does not reduce the incidence of upper digestive tract cancer, including esophageal cancer, in male smokers aged 50-69 years of age (34547). Additionally, a meta-analysis of low quality clinical research suggests that taking beta-carotene supplements alone or in combination with other antioxidants, such as vitamin A or vitamin E plus vitamin C, does not reduce the risk of esophageal cancer and may increase mortality (12185).
• Liver cancer. Oral beta-carotene does not seem to reduce liver cancer risk. Details: Clinical research in male smokers aged 50-69 years shows that taking beta-carotene 20 mg daily, alone or with vitamin E 50 mg daily, for 5-8 years does not reduce the incidence of liver cancer when compared with placebo (91383).
• Liver disease. Oral beta-carotene does not seem to reduce mortality from liver disease in male smokers. Details: Clinical research in male smokers aged 50-69 years shows that taking beta-carotene 20 mg daily alone or with vitamin E 50 mg daily for 5-8 years does not reduce the risk of mortality due to chronic liver disease when compared with placebo (91383).
• Overall mortality. Oral beta-carotene does not seem to reduce all-cause mortality. Details: Some meta-analyses published between 2007 and 2013 show that taking beta-carotene in doses of up to 50 mg daily or every other day, alone or in combination with other antioxidants, for up to 12 years increases the risk of overall mortality by 5% to 7% (15305,34622,90775). However, a more recent meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking beta-carotene in doses up to 75 mg daily for up to 12 years does not affect the risk of overall mortality (109767). Additionally, some research shows that taking beta-carotene 6 mg daily in combination with vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium, and zinc for approximately 7 years might lower all-cause mortality in males, but not females (14109). It is unclear if any beneficial effects are related to beta-carotene, the other antioxidants, or the combination. With regard to dietary beta-carotene, a meta-analysis of population studies suggests that each 5000 mcg/day of increased intake is associated with an 8% reduction in mortality. In addition, each 25 mcg/dL increase in beta-carotene blood concentration is associated with a 19% reduction in mortality (109779).
• Stroke. Oral beta-carotene does not seem to reduce stroke risk and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Taking all-trans beta-carotene (synthetic beta-carotene) 20 mg daily orally for a median of 6 years does not reduce the overall incidence of stroke in male smokers (1371,34514). Additionally, there is some evidence that beta-carotene actually increases the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage by 62% in patients who also drink alcohol (1371,3359). However, evidence with dietary intake of beta-carotene is in contrast. A meta-analysis of population studies suggests that beta-carotene is associated with a 19% reduction in the risk of stroke per 5000 mcg/day of increased dietary intake and 15% reduction in risk of stroke per 25 mcg/dL increase in beta-carotene blood concentration (109779).

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Cancer. Oral beta-carotene does not reduce the risk of most cancer types. Details: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) states that the harms of beta-carotene supplementation outweigh the potential benefits for prevention of cancer and therefore recommends against its use (108641,112166). Taking beta-carotene 20-50 mg daily, or 50 mg on alternate days, does not reduce the incidence of a variety of cancers in adults, including uterine, cervical, thyroid, bladder, skin (melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma), brain, and blood cancers (140,1297,1448,2599,2642,2646,2657,3949,34580,34612). Additionally, meta-analyses of multiple clinical studies show that beta-carotene supplementation does not decrease cancer-related mortality and can actually increase the risk of bladder cancer by 52% and lung cancer by 14% (34612,109767). Similarly, a meta-analysis of several population studies does not suggest that high versus low dietary beta-carotene intake is associated with reduced cancer risk. However, this analysis does suggest that each 25 mcg/dL increase in blood levels of beta-carotene is associated with a 24% lower risk of cancer (109779).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral beta-carotene does not reduce the risk of CVD, and supplementation may increase CVD-related mortality risk in some patients. Details: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) states that the harms of beta-carotene supplementation outweigh the potential benefits for prevention of CVD and therefore recommends against its use (108641,112166). Also, a Science Advisory from the American Heart Association states that the evidence does not justify use of antioxidants such as beta-carotene for reducing the risk of CVD (12142). Although large population studies of serum, dietary, or supplemental beta-carotene have found mixed effects of beta-carotene on CVD risk (3933,7386,7387,34566,101698,107290,109768,109779), most controlled clinical trials show either no effect or a negative effect on CVD incidence and/or mortality (1448,2642,2646,2657,3935,3949,7388,9817,10130,14108,34552,34668). A meta-analysis of these and other randomized controlled trials in various populations shows that beta-carotene supplementation is associated with a modestly increased CVD incidence (109769). Meta-analyses also show that beta-carotene supplementation either increases CVD mortality or is not associated with CVD mortality (109767,109769). Some evidence suggests that the risk of CVD mortality is greatest in people who smoke (2642,3937,3949). Most studies have used beta-carotene in doses of 20-50 mg daily or every other day, alone or in combination with other antioxidants (1448,2642,2646,2657,3935,3937,3949,7388,9817,10130,14108,34552,34668,109767,109769). The adverse effects of beta-carotene on CVD risk and/or mortality do not seem to occur in people who eat foods high in beta-carotene content (1440,2657,7714,7715,7716).
• Colorectal adenoma. Oral beta-carotene supplementation does not reduce the risk of colorectal adenomas and may actually increase the risk in some patients. Details: Most clinical studies show that taking beta-carotene 20-75 mg daily or 50 mg on alternate days does not decrease the risk of colorectal adenomas when compared with placebo (3953,3955,34612,34658). One clinical study shows that beta-carotene supplementation does not decrease the risk of adenoma recurrence in most patients with previous adenoma removal. Although it may decrease the risk of adenoma recurrence by 44% in patients who never smoke nor consume alcohol, it may actually increase the risk of adenoma recurrence by 107% in those patients who smoke and drink more than one alcoholic beverage daily (34500). Also, taking beta-carotene along with vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium, and calcium carbonate for 3 years does not reduce colorectal polyp growth when compared with placebo (12185,34676).
• Lung cancer. Oral beta-carotene does not reduce the risk of lung cancer, and supplemental beta-carotene may actually increase lung cancer risk in some people. Details: Taking beta-carotene 20-30 mg daily seems to increase the risk of lung cancer by 18% to 28% in people who smoke (especially those smoking more than 20 cigarettes per day), former smokers, people exposed to asbestos, and those who ingest significant amounts of alcohol (one or more drinks per day) in addition to smoking (139,1471,2582,2642,3949,11303,11786,34522,34663,109770). A meta-analysis of clinical research in various populations shows that taking beta-carotene supplements increases the risk of lung cancer mortality by 14%; smoking status was not specified in this analysis (109767). However, beta-carotene from food does not seem to have this adverse effect. In patients diagnosed with lung cancer, clinical evidence shows that taking a combination of beta-carotene, alpha-tocopherol, and selenium does not decrease lung cancer-related mortality when compared with placebo after 5.25 years of use (34539).
• Prostate cancer. Oral beta-carotene supplementation does not reduce the risk of prostate cancer in most males, and may actually increase risk in some people. Details: The majority of reliable evidence shows that beta-carotene does not decrease prostate cancer risk in most people (148,1473,2406,7895,12877,34612). A large study in healthy males shows that taking 50 mg of beta-carotene every other day for nearly 13 years has no overall protective effect. However, some subgroups may benefit, such as those with low beta-carotene levels, low lycopene levels, or high body mass index (1447,1473,12877,14124). Some research suggests that a combination of beta-carotene, vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium, and zinc might reduce the risk of prostate cancer in patients with normal PSA levels (14135). However, the benefit might be due to the other ingredients. There is also some concern that beta-carotene supplements might actually increase the risk of prostate cancer in some people. A large-scale population study shows that taking a multivitamin more than 7 times per week and also taking a separate beta-carotene supplement increases the risk of developing advanced prostate cancer (15607). Similarly, a large-scale clinical trial shows that smokers who take a beta-carotene supplement 20 mg daily for 5-8 years have an increased risk of developing prostate cancer (3959).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral beta-carotene has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking an antioxidant combination including beta-carotene 15 mg, vitamin C 500 mg, vitamin E 400 IU, and zinc 80 mg daily reduces the odds of progression to advanced AMD by up to 31%. In patients with more severe AMD, this combination reduces the odds of progression to advanced AMD by 34%. This combination also reduces the odds of visual acuity loss by up to 29% in patients with severe AMD (7303,11326,90069). Evidence for the use of beta-carotene in low-risk patients with AMD is conflicting (6583,6584,7303). There is contradictory evidence about the role of dietary beta-carotene for reducing the risk of developing AMD. Some evidence suggests that increasing dietary intake of beta-carotene might decrease the risk of developing AMD by up to 43% (5922). Other evidence suggests that increasing dietary beta-carotene alone does not reduce the risk of AMD. Increasing beta-carotene consumption also does not seem to be associated with a lower risk of age-related maculopathy (14007,34564). However, consuming above average amounts of dietary beta-carotene along with other nutrients such as vitamin E, vitamin C, and zinc might reduce risk of AMD by up to 35% (14257).
• Aging skin. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for improving wrinkles and skin elasticity. Details: A small study in females over 50 years of age shows that taking beta-carotene 30 mg daily for 90 days improves facial wrinkles and some measures of skin elasticity when compared with baseline. However, a dose of 90 mg daily does not seem to be beneficial (91381). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for improving symptoms of ALS. Details: One large observational cohort study has found that supplemental beta-carotene 20 mg daily is not associated with reduced risk of ALS (90087). However, a meta-analysis of 5 observational cohort studies has found that the highest dietary intake of beta-carotene is associated with a 15% reduced risk of ALS when compared with the lowest intakes (90412).
• Anxiety. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for preventing or treating anxiety. Details: One observational study of middle-aged females has found that higher dietary intake of beta-carotene is associated with lower odds of anxiety during perimenopause, but not prior to menopause. Perimenopausal individuals with the highest dietary intake of beta-carotene had a 29% reduction in the odds of anxiety when compared with the lowest intakes (107288).
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for asthma prevention. Details: Observational research has found that dietary beta-carotene is not associated with a reduced incidence of asthma in children or adults (34567,107291). However, other observational research has found that a higher dietary intake of beta-carotene is associated with up to 33% lower odds of having asthma when compared with a lower dietary intake (109765). The effects of supplemental beta-carotene are unclear.
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for improving COPD. Details: The prevalence of bronchitis and dyspnea in male smokers with COPD seems to be lower in those patients who consume a diet containing high amounts of beta-carotene (2580). However, taking beta-carotene supplements does not seem to help (2580).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for improving cognitive function and memory. Details: Observational research has found that consuming more beta-carotene in the diet over 22 years is associated with lower odds of poor cognitive function (104468). However, it is unclear if beta-carotene supplements are beneficial. Some clinical research shows that taking beta-carotene 50 mg on alternate days for 1 year does not improve cognitive performance, including verbal memory, when compared with placebo in older males, long-term treatment of up to 18 years shows improvement in these outcomes (34558).
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for CHD. Details: A meta-analysis of several population studies suggests that beta-carotene is associated with an 18% reduced risk of CHD per 5000 mcg/day of increased dietary intake and a 20% reduction in risk of CHD per 25 mcg/dL increase in beta-carotene blood concentration (109779).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for depression. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that dietary intake of beta-carotene is inversely associated with depression. The highest intake of beta-carotene was associated with a 37% reduced risk of depression when compared with the lowest. Also, intakes of beta-carotene were lower in individuals with depression (109743). The effect of beta-carotene supplementation is unclear.
• Exercise-induced asthma. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for improving exercise-induced asthma symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in adults with exercise-induced asthma shows that taking a mixture of beta-carotene isomers 64 mg daily for 1 week seems to prevent asthma symptoms after 7 minutes of exercise (1474).
• Fractures. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for fracture prevention. Details: Observational research has found that increased beta-carotene consumption in the diet is associated with a lower fracture risk. Geographically, the reduced risk seems to be most prevalent in China and Singapore, while the risk reduction was not significant in the US and Europe (104466).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for gastric cancer prevention. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients at risk for gastric cancer shows that taking beta-carotene orally 30 mg daily might increase regression of precancerous gastric lesions when compared with placebo (2579). It is unclear if this translates to decreased gastric cancer risk. In a meta-analysis of low-quality clinical research, beta-carotene did not decrease risk of gastric cancer when compared with placebo (12185). Beta-carotene in combination with vitamins A, C, and E also did not reduce gastric cancer risk (12185,34545). However, in a population of high-risk, malnourished Chinese adults, taking beta-carotene 15 mg daily plus vitamin E and selenium was associated with a decrease in gastric cancer incidence, but not mortality, when compared with placebo (2658,12185).
• Hearing loss. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for hearing loss. Details: Population research suggests that the highest dietary intake of beta-carotene is associated with a 12% decreased risk of developing self-reported hearing loss over a 22-year follow up period when compared with the lowest dietary intake (109807). Additionally, a small study in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss shows that taking beta-carotene 26000 IU, ascorbic acid 200 mg, d-alpha-tocopherol 200 IU, and selenium 50 mcg twice daily for 30 days in addition to standard treatment improves hearing to a greater degree than standard treatment alone (101700).
• Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking beta-carotene 120 mg daily for 14 days, in combination with conventional Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, does not improve the rate of eradication when compared with conventional eradication therapy alone (34472).
• HIV/AIDS. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for HIV outcomes. Details: A small clinical study in HIV-positive patients shows that taking beta-carotene 180 mg daily for one month increases total white blood cell count, CD4 cell counts, and CD4/CD8 ratios when compared with placebo (34667). However, taking the same dose of beta-carotene for a longer duration of 3 months does not improve these outcomes when compared with placebo in HIV-infected patients (34671).
• Infant development. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for improving infant motor development. Details: Observational research has found that a higher level of beta-carotene in breastmilk is associated with improved infant motor development when compared with lower levels (102157).
• Influenza. Beta-carotene has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical trial in healthy Japanese adults shows that drinking 200 mL of a beverage containing beta-carotene 7.4-12.4 mg and Levilactobacillus brevis KB290 10 billion colony forming units daily for 12 weeks during influenza season does not reduce the risk of influenza or fever when compared with placebo. However, in a subgroup analysis of patients under 40 years of age, the risk of influenza was reduced by around 53% when compared with placebo (107287). It is unclear if these findings are due to beta-carotene, Levilactobacillus brevis, or the combination.
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for IBS. Details: A small clinical trial in healthy adults with minor diarrhea-predominant IBS-like symptoms shows that taking a combination of beta-carotene 4.0-4.5 mg and Levilactobacillus brevis daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces abdominal pain and stool frequency when compared with placebo. There were no differences between groups in improvements in stool consistency, incomplete evacuation, or other symptoms (110960). Although this study included adults with diarrhea-predominant IBS-like symptoms, patients with diagnosed IBS were excluded, limiting the generalizability of the study.
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral beta-carotene might help prevent NAFLD. Details: Observational research has found that higher intake and blood levels of beta-carotene are associated with 25% to 37% lower odds of NAFLD (101696).
• Oral leukoplakia. Evidence for the use of beta-carotene for oral leukoplakia is conflicting. Details: Some clinical research in patients with tobacco and/or betel nut chewing habits shows that taking beta-carotene 360 mg daily for 12 months induces complete remission in 33% of patients with oral leukoplakia, compared with 10% of patients receiving placebo (34674). A small clinical study shows that taking beta-carotene (Solatene, Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc.) 30 mg twice daily for 6 months induces remission in 52% of patients with oral leukoplakia when compared with baseline (1472). However, a lower dose of beta-carotene in combination with vitamin C did not seem to be beneficial. A small clinical study in Japanese non-smoking adults with oral leukoplakia shows that taking beta-carotene 10 mg daily plus vitamin C 500 mg daily for 12 months does not improve clinical response or reduce the development of oral cancer over 5 years when compared with placebo (91384).
• Oral mucositis. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for improving oral mucositis after radiation therapy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking beta-carotene 250 mg daily for up to 21 days followed by 75 mg daily for the remainder of radiation therapy or chemotherapy does not prevent the development of oral mucositis when compared with placebo (34637).
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for reducing osteoarthritis progression. Details: Observational research has found that higher dietary intake of beta-carotene is not associated with a reduced risk of developing osteoarthritis. However, the highest intake of beta-carotene is associated with a reduced rate of knee osteoarthritis progression when compared with lowest intake (5881).
• Osteoporosis. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for reducing the risk of osteoporosis. Details: Although observational studies in individuals 50 years of age and older has found that those with the highest dietary intake of beta-carotene had a 67% reduced odds of osteoporosis when compared with the lowest intake (107289), a meta-analysis of observational research shows that beta-carotene intake, based on dietary intake and serum levels, is not associated with risk of osteoporosis (109771). However, the highest intake of beta-carotene was associated with a 30% reduced risk of fractures in male, female, and Asian subgroups when compared with the lowest intake. Also, there was evidence of a small association between increased beta-carotene intake and increased overall bone density in Asian individuals, but not in individuals from studies published in the US, Europe, or Australia (109771).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: Observational research has found that a diet rich in carotenoids, including beta-carotene and especially alpha-carotene, is associated with a lower risk of ovarian cancer in postmenopausal patients (10133).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for pancreatic cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of low quality research shows that taking beta-carotene supplements, alone or in combination with other antioxidants such as vitamin A or vitamin E, does not reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer when compared with control (12185).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene prevents Parkinson disease development. Details: Observational research has found that beta-carotene intake is not associated with Parkinson disease risk (91164).
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for improving physical performance and muscle strength in older people. Details: Population research has found that higher intake of dietary beta-carotene is associated with improved physical performance and muscle strength in elderly people (14006).
• Polymorphous light eruption (PMLE). It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for improving PMLE. Details: Some small clinical studies show that taking beta-carotene orally 25-250 mg daily improves sun exposure tolerance when compared with baseline in patients with PMLE (34455,34652). However, one larger clinical study shows that beta-carotene 15-180 mg daily does not improve photosensitivity when compared with baseline (34673). The validity of the findings from each of these studies is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Pre-eclampsia. It is unclear if oral beta-carotene is beneficial for pre-eclampsia prevention. Details: Some epidemiological research has found that the highest intake of beta-carotene during pregnancy is associated with 69% reduced odds of having pre-eclampsia when compared with the lowest intake (109762). The effects of beta-carotene supplementation are unclear. More evidence is needed to rate beta-carotene for these uses.

(Read more about BETA-CAROTENE)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Biotin deficiency. Oral and injectable biotin prevents and treats biotin deficiency. Details: Biotin up to 10 mg daily has been used to treat and prevent biotin deficiency. Injections of biotin 150 mcg daily for 3-5 days have been used in adults. Biotin deficiency might occur due to different etiologies such as inherited biotinidase deficiency, malnutrition, chronic use of anticonvulsants, pregnancy, and excessive and chronic raw egg consumption (6243,19347). A very small study in newborns aged 1-6 months shows that adding biotin to infant formula safely improves biotin status in formula-fed infants (111365). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of blinding, no randomization, and the small sample size.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Multiple sclerosis (MS). In spite of contrary reports, high-dose biotin (300 mg daily) does not reduce disability in patients with progressive MS. It also does not seem to be linked to an increased risk for relapse. Details: Although most earlier research suggested benefit, the highest quality evidence shows that high-dose biotin does not improve outcomes in progressive MS (95662,102963,102966,104011). A large multi-centered randomized clinical trial (SPI2) in patients with progressive MS and high disability shows that taking biotin 100 mg three times daily for 15 months does not improve disability, as measured on the expanded disability status scale (EDSS), or 25-foot walking time, when compared with placebo. The SPI2 clinical trial also did not find that biotin increases the rate of relapse (104011), a concern raised in one observational study of high-dose biotin (104000). Also, a large observational study of adults with progressive MS failed to identity an increase in annualized relapse rates in patients that reported taking biotin when compared with controls (105716). Other observational research has also found no effect on the relapse risk (102963,102964). There is some speculation that any increased rate of relapse identified in some high-dose biotin cohorts might be due to detection bias or reduced compliance with disease-modifying therapies.
• Seborrheic dermatitis. Oral biotin doesn't seem to improve seborrheic dermatitis of infancy. Details: A clinical trial in infants with seborrheic dermatitis shows that biotin given by mouth does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (8469).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alopecia areata. It is unclear if oral biotin is beneficial for alopecia areata. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults with alopecia areata shows that weekly injections of intramuscular biotin 5 mg/1 mL and dexpanthenol 250 mg/2 mL for 6 weeks reduces hair fall count and transiently increases hair density compared with baseline (111366). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of a placebo control group, small sample size, and short duration of treatment. It is unclear if the effects are due to biotin, dexpanthenol, or the combination. Another small clinical study in 9-year-old children with alopecia areata shows that taking biotin 20 mg with zinc aspartate 100 mg orally along with topical application of clobetasol propionate 0.025% daily for one year promotes hair regrowth in 33% of children, compared with 0% in the group receiving the steroid deflazacort (6932). It is unclear if these effects are due to biotin, zinc, topical clobetasol, or the combination.
• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). Although there is interest in using oral biotin for ALS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of biotin for this condition.
• Biotin-thiamine-responsive basal ganglia disease. Adding oral biotin to oral thiamine does not seem to improve most symptoms associated with this condition, although it may slightly speed recovery from acute crisis in children. Details: A small case series in children ages 1-12 years with biotin-thiamine-responsive basal ganglia disease has found that adding biotin 5 mg/kg daily to thiamine 40 mg/kg daily for 30 months is not associated with additional symptomatic improvement in encephalopathy, seizures, dystonia, or other neurologic sequelae when compared with taking only thiamine. However, taking biotin with thiamine is associated with a 1-day reduction in recovery from acute crisis when compared with thiamine alone (95661).
• Brittle nails. Low quality clinical studies suggest that oral biotin might improve nail thickness and prevent the splitting of brittle nails. Details: Some small, low quality clinical studies in people with brittle nails shows that taking biotin 2.5 mg orally daily for 1.5 to 15 months increases nail thickness and decreases the splitting of fingernails and toenails in some people when compared with baseline (171,35593). The validity of these findings is limited by the small study sizes and the lack of a comparator group.
• Depression. Although there is interest in using oral biotin for mild depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of biotin for this condition.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral biotin is beneficial for type 2 diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials shows that taking biotin 1.5-15 mg orally daily for 1-3 months does not improve fasting blood glucose or serum insulin levels when compared with placebo. However, the validity of these results is limited by inclusion of subjects with and without diabetes (110044). A very small study in adults with type 2 diabetes also shows that taking biotin 5 mg three times daily for 28 days does not affect glucose or insulin levels when compared to baseline (11579). Biotin has also been studied in combination with other ingredients. Preliminary clinical research shows that a taking a specific supplement containing a combination of biotin 2 mg and chromium picolinate 600 mcg (Diachrome, Nutrition 21) can lower blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes who are poorly controlled on oral hypoglycemic drugs (12385,12390,15169). It is unclear if these effects are due to biotin, chromium, or the combination.
• Diabetic neuropathy. Although there is interest in using oral and intramuscular biotin for diabetic neuropathy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of biotin for this condition.
• Muscle cramps. It is unclear if biotin is beneficial for improving muscle cramps in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Details: Patients undergoing hemodialysis are prone to muscle cramps. A small clinical study in patients with hemodialysis-related muscle cramps shows that taking biotin 1 mg in the morning daily for at least one week prevents and reduces severity of muscle cramps when compared to baseline. Cessation of biotin led to recurrence of cramps, and restarting oral biotin led to resolution of cramps during hemodialysis (89475). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of comparator group. More evidence is needed to rate biotin for these uses.

(Read more about BIOTIN)

There is insufficient reliable information available about the effectiveness of blackberry.

(Read more about BLACKBERRY)

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Hypertension. Most clinical research suggests that consuming freeze-dried blueberries or blueberry powder does not lower blood pressure in patients with hypertension, prehypertension, or other risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Details: Although conflicting results exist (92386,99139), a meta-analysis of 6 clinical trials including approximately 200 patients with hypertension, prehypertension, or other risk factors for cardiovascular disease shows that consuming freeze dried blueberries or blueberry powder 22-50 grams daily for 6-8 weeks does not significantly lower systolic or diastolic blood pressure when compared with placebo (92390).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Anxiety. It is unclear if oral blueberry can improve symptoms of anxiety. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults shows that drinking 30 mL of blueberry juice diluted in 100 mL of water twice daily for 20 days reduces measures of state and trait anxiety when compared with placebo (111235).
• Age-related cognitive decline. Small clinical studies suggest that oral blueberry products may slightly improve some measures of cognitive function in older adults with age-related cognitive decline. Details: Most clinical evidence shows that blueberry can improve some aspects of cognitive decline, but it has minimal effect on other measures. One small clinical trial in older patients with self-reported cognitive decline shows that taking freeze-dried blueberry powder 12.5 grams twice daily for 6 months modestly improves cognitive performance in daily activities but most measures of cognitive function did not improve (97181). Another small clinical study in patients 60 years of age and older with self-reported memory complaints shows that taking a wild blueberry extract (ThinkBlue, Naturex Inc) 100 mg daily with cysteine and glutathione modestly improves episodic memory at 3 months, but not at 6 months, when compared with placebo. However, taking this same blueberry extract or a wild blueberry powder 450 mg or 900 mg daily with cysteine and glutathione does not improve sequence recall, working memory, or executive function (99139). Other small clinical studies show a benefit in some, but not all measures of executive functioning and memory (96467,111234)
• Aging. It is unclear if consuming blueberry can improve functional mobility in adults 60 years of age and older. Details: One small clinical study in adults over 60 years of age shows that consuming 2 cups of frozen blueberries daily for 6 weeks improves some measures of functional mobility, such as foot placement and balance, when compared with drinking carrot juice. However, blueberry does not seem to improve hand grip strength, executive function, or other measurements of gait speed when compared with carrot juice (92387). Another small clinical study in this same age group shows that consuming 12 grams of powdered blueberry mixed with liquid twice daily for 3 months does not improve measures of functional mobility when compared with placebo (96467).
• Athletic performance. Small clinical studies suggest that oral freeze-dried blueberry powder may not reduce exertion or improve long-distance running performance in trained runners. Details: Two small clinical studies in adults with running experience show that taking freeze-dried blueberry powder 24 grams three times daily for four days does not improve perceived exertion, the time to run 8 km, or distance run over 30 minutes when compared with placebo. However, blueberry does appear to modestly attenuate increases in blood lactate after running (101963,107282).
• Cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral blueberry for preventing cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of blueberry for this purpose.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Small clinical studies suggest that oral blueberry supplementation might modestly improve body weight and triglyceride levels, but not body mass index (BMI), glycemic control, or cholesterol levels, in patients at risk for CVD. Details: A meta-analysis of 11 small and low-quality clinical studies involving a total of 497 adults with various risk factors for CVD shows that taking blueberry for 4-16 weeks modestly reduces weight and triglyceride levels, but does not improve other risk factors for CVD, including BMI, glycemic indices, cholesterol levels, and certain inflammatory mediators, when compared with placebo or other control. In a sub-group analysis, weight reduction was slightly more favorable in studies of longer than 6 weeks' duration (mean reduction of 0.91 kg) and in studies using blueberry powder or freeze-dried blueberry (mean reduction of 0.86 kg) (105702). The validity of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity and small size of the included studies. Additionally, it is unclear if blueberry is beneficial for reducing the risk for CVD or CVD-related complications.
• Cataracts. Although there has been interest in using oral blueberry for preventing cataracts, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of blueberry for this purpose.
• Cognitive function. Small clinical studies suggest that oral blueberry products may improve some, but not most, measures of cognitive function in children and adults. Details: Several small clinical studies in children 7-10 years of age show that drinking a blueberry drink containing 30 grams of freeze-dried blueberries or 200 grams of fresh blueberries as a single dose does not improve most measures of cognitive function when compared with placebo. These trials showed small improvements in some measures of cognitive function, including auditory-verbal learning, word recognition, and delayed memory, but these specific findings were not consistent across all studies (92394,96465,101961). Additionally, a small clinical trial in healthy young adults shows that taking a combination of blueberry and grape extracts (Memophenol, Activ'Inside) 600 mg increases the ability to complete serial three subtraction by 2.5-fold when compared with placebo. However, there were no other improvements in working memory or attention during a sustained cognitive effort (101960).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral blueberry extract or freeze-dried powder is beneficial in patients with depression. Details: One small clinical study in adults with cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT)-associated depression and depression-associated gastrointestinal infection shows that taking blueberry extract 10 mg daily for 3 months reduces symptoms of depression by 49% and gastrointestinal infection rates by 84% when compared to baseline; when compared with placebo, these changes are significant (96464). Another small clinical study in healthy adults shows that drinking 30 mL of blueberry juice diluted in 100 mL of water twice daily for 20 days reduces symptoms of depression when compared with placebo (111235). A small clinical study in healthy adolescents 11-17 years of age without diagnosed mental health issues at baseline shows that drinking freeze-dried wild blueberry powder 13 grams daily for 4 weeks improves self-reported depressive symptoms, but not anxiety symptoms or transient affect, when compared with placebo. The adolescents enrolled in this study were found to have suboptimal fruit and vegetable intake at baseline (105703).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral freeze-dried blueberry powder is beneficial in patients with diabetes. Details: A small clinical study in males 45-75 years of age with type 2 diabetes shows that drinking 11 grams of freeze-dried highbush blueberry powder mixed with water twice daily with a meal for 8 weeks reduces glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values and triglyceride levels, but not body weight, fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or blood pressure, when compared with placebo. This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (105701). Blueberry has also been evaluated for the prevention of gestational diabetes. A small clinical study in patients with a history of gestational diabetes shows that consuming 280 grams of blueberries plus 12 grams of soluble fiber daily for 18 weeks, starting at less than 20 weeks' gestation, along with standard care reduces maternal weight gain and blood glucose levels after glucose challenge testing when compared with standard care alone. However, neither gestational diabetes incidence nor infant birth weight was lower with blueberry supplementation when compared with standard care alone (107281).
• Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear if oral blueberry is beneficial in patients with hyperlipidemia. Details: One small clinical study in healthy adults shows that drinking blueberry juice 30 mL twice daily for 20 days reduces total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when compared with placebo (111235). Additionally, drinking a combination of blueberry, apple, chokeberry, and cranberry juice 300 mL daily for 6 weeks appears to decrease total cholesterol and increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol when compared to baseline in females with overweight or obesity and at least one risk factor for cardiovascular disease (111233). However, the validity of the study is limited by its small size, short duration, and lack of a comparator group. It is unclear if these effects are due to blueberry, other ingredients, or the combination. In contrast, other small clinical studies suggest that blueberry does not improve lipid levels (105701,111234). A small clinical study in males 45-75 years old shows that blueberry has no effect on total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol, but may reduce triglycerides, when compared with placebo. However, in a sub-group of patients also taking lipid-lowering medications, blueberry reduced levels of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol when compared with placebo (105701). Another small clinical study in middle-aged adults with overweight shows that taking oral blueberry powder daily for 12 weeks does not impact total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, or triglycerides when compared with placebo (111234). However, these studies may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Hypertriglyceridemia. It is unclear if oral blueberry leaf extract is beneficial in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia shows that taking a single dose of a blueberry leaf extract 300 mg along with a high-fat meal reduces postprandial triglyceride levels, but not postprandial glucose or insulin levels, when compared with placebo (101959).
• Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). It is unclear if oral blueberry juice is beneficial in children with JIA. Details: A small clinical study in children with JIA shows that adding 50 mL of blueberry juice daily to treatment with etanercept 50 mg twice weekly for 6 months increases the percentage of patients who achieve a 20% improvement in symptoms based on American College of Rheumatology criteria when compared with taking etanercept along with placebo juice. About 75% of patients in the blueberry juice group experienced a 20% improvement in symptoms, compared with 51% of patients in the placebo group, suggesting that for every four patients that drink blueberry juice along with etanercept therapy, one additional patient will experience a 20% or greater improvement in symptoms. Drinking blueberry juice also appears to reduce side effects caused by etanercept, including weight gain, infection, diarrhea, and anorexia (92388).
• Metabolic syndrome. Small clinical studies in patients with metabolic syndrome, along with an analysis of studies in patients at risk for metabolic syndrome, suggest that oral freeze-dried blueberries do not improve body weight or glycemic control, but may slightly lower blood pressure and cholesterol levels. Details: A small clinical study in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that taking freeze-dried blueberry powder 26 grams daily for 6 months improves flow-mediated dilation by 45% when compared with placebo, but does not affect low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, insulin resistance, or blood pressure. In a sub-group of patients not taking statins, blueberry increased levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by 3 mg/dL; however, a lower dose of 13 grams daily had no beneficial effects (101958). Another small clinical trial in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that consuming freeze-dried blueberries 25 grams twice daily for 8 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure by around 4% and diastolic blood pressure by around 3% when compared with placebo, but does not affect body weight, lipid levels, or glycemic control (107278). Additionally, a small clinical trial in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that drinking a smoothie containing freeze-dried blueberry powder 22.5 grams twice daily for 6 weeks does not improve blood pressure, body weight, glycemic control, or lipid levels when compared with placebo, although it does improve measures of endothelial function (107279). A meta-analysis evaluating the studies above, along with 9 small clinical trials in patients at risk for metabolic syndrome, shows that blueberry supplementation does not improve body weight, glycemic control, triglyceride levels, or systolic blood pressure. However, it reduces total cholesterol by around 8 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by around 9 mg/dL, and diastolic blood pressure by around 2 mmHg when compared with placebo (107280).
• Muscle strength. Oral blueberry has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in young, healthy males shows that taking blueberry extract 200 mg plus phosphocreatine disodium salts 5 grams daily for 28 days improves peak torque and average power during leg extension exercises when compared to baseline, while individuals taking placebo saw no improvements in these measures (107284). It is unclear if these findings are due to blueberry, phosphocreatine, or the combination.
• Night vision. Although there has been interest in using oral blueberry for improving night vision, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of blueberry for this purpose.
• Obesity. Oral blueberry has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in females with overweight or obesity and at least one risk factor for cardiovascular disease shows that drinking a combination of blueberry, apple, chokeberry, and cranberry juice 300 mL daily for 6 weeks does not reduce body weight, body mass index (BMI), or blood pressure but might improve total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol when compared to baseline (111233). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the small study size, short duration, and lack of a comparator group. It is unclear if these effects are due to blueberry, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Although there has been interest in using oral blueberry for preventing UTIs, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of blueberry for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate blueberry for these uses.

(Read more about BLUEBERRY)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Consumption of cruciferous vegetables, including broccoli, seems to reduce the risk of developing colorectal cancer. Details: Epidemiological research suggests that the highest intakes of cruciferous vegetables, including broccoli, are associated with an 18% to 20% reduced risk of developing colorectal neoplasms when compared with the lowest intakes (14148,96187,96189).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bladder cancer. It is unclear if consumption of broccoli reduces the risk of developing bladder cancer. Details: Epidemiological research suggests that eating about 1.75 cups daily of cruciferous vegetables, such as broccoli or cabbage, is associated with a 30% reduced risk of developing bladder cancer (14864).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if consumption of broccoli reduces the risk of developing breast cancer. Details: Epidemiological research suggests that consumption of broccoli is associated with a modestly reduced risk of developing breast cancer in premenopausal adults. However, broccoli consumption does not seem to be associated with breast cancer risk in postmenopausal adults (14146).
• Fibromyalgia. Broccoli has only been evaluated in combination with ascorbigen; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in females with fibromyalgia shows that taking one capsule containing ascorbigen 100 mg and broccoli powder 400 mg once daily for one month improves pain by 18% and reduces physical impairment by 20% when compared to baseline (19605). It is unclear if this effect is due to broccoli, ascorbigen, or the combination. The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if consumption of broccoli reduces the risk of developing gastric cancer. Details: A small epidemiological study suggests that higher consumption of broccoli is associated with a reduced risk of developing gastric cancer when compared with lower consumption (14148).
• Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if consumption of broccoli is beneficial for treating Helicobacter pylori infection. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with Helicobacter pylori infection shows that taking broccoli seed extract 200 mg, containing 16% glucosinolates, daily before bedtime for 2 months does not improve Helicobacter pylori eradication rate when compared with placebo (112445,112446).
• Hypercholesterolemia. Broccoli has only been evaluated in combination with cabbage; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia shows that consuming 160 grams of a beverage containing broccoli, cabbage, and fruit twice daily for 12 weeks reduces levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 8.5% when compared to baseline. It is unclear if the improvement from baseline differed when compared with those consuming a similar beverage without broccoli and cabbage (19607). It is unclear if this effect is due to broccoli, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if consumption of broccoli can prevent hypertension in healthy adults. Details: A meta-analysis of 3 prospective cohort studies in healthy adults suggests that eating 100 grams of broccoli daily is associated with a 12% reduced risk of hypertension. However, 2 other studies in the meta-analysis suggest that broccoli, consumed as part of a larger group of cruciferous vegetables, is associated with an 11% increased risk of hypertension per 100 grams eaten daily (112087).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if consumption of broccoli reduces the risk of developing prostate cancer; the available research is conflicting. In patients with prostate cancer, broccoli has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Some epidemiological research suggests that consumption of Brassica vegetables, such as broccoli, Brussels sprouts, cauliflower, and cabbage, is associated with a reduced risk of developing prostate cancer (14145). However, other epidemiological research has found no association (14147,15172). Clinical research in adults with prostate cancer shows that taking a whole food formulation containing broccoli powder 100 mg, turmeric powder 100 mg, pomegranate whole fruit powder 100 mg, and green tea extract 20 mg three times daily for 6 months prevents an increase in prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels. Mean PSA levels increased by 15% in the whole food formulation group, compared with 79% in the placebo group. Also, 46% of those taking the whole food formulation showed final PSA levels that were the same or lower than initial PSA levels, compared with 14% of those in the placebo group (89730). However, it is not yet known whether the whole food formulation reduces the risk of prostate cancer progression or recurrence. It is unclear if these effects are due to broccoli, other ingredients, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate broccoli for these uses.

(Read more about BROCCOLI)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Population research has found that higher intake of Brussels sprout is not associated with significantly reduced risk of BPH (26190).
• Bladder cancer. Epidemiologic research has found that eating about 1 cup daily of cruciferous vegetables, such as cabbage, Brussels sprout, cauliflower, broccoli, kale, or collards, is associated with a 30% lower risk of developing bladder cancer in adults (14864). Other population research has found that higher intake of cruciferous vegetables, such as cauliflower, Brussels sprout, cabbage, broccoli, and kale, is associated with a 51% reduction in the risk of developing bladder cancer in males. However, higher intake of Brussels sprout alone does not seem to be associated with a reduced risk of bladder cancer (26184).
• Breast cancer. Some population research has found that higher intake of cruciferous vegetables, including broccoli, Brussels sprout, cabbage, cauliflower, collards, and kale, is associated with a slight increase in the risk of breast cancer in premenopausal adults, while higher intake appears to be associated with a slight but statistically insignificant decrease in the risk in postmenopausal adults (26188). However, other population research has found that higher intake of Brussels sprout alone is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (26189). Cruciferous vegetables might increase urinary levels of 2-hydroxyestrone, and its ratio to 16-alpha-hydroxyestrone, which could reduce the risk of breast cancer. However, research in pre-menopausal adults shows that taking a dried Brussels sprout and kale supplement, 3.3 grams daily for 8 weeks, or increasing dietary intake of Brussels sprout or broccoli by one 40-gram serving daily, does not increase urinary levels of 2-hydroxyestrone, or its ratio to 16-alpha-hydroxyestrone, when compared with placebo (112086).
• Diabetes. Population research has found that higher intake of cruciferous vegetables, including broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, and Brussels sprout, is not associated with a reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes (26187). A meta-analysis of 23 studies shows that the highest levels of combined vegetable and fruit intake are associated with a 7% reduction in the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, when compared with the lowest intakes, but higher intake of Brussels sprout alone is associated with a 7% increase in the risk (112088).
• Hypertension. A meta-analysis of 18 studies in healthy adults shows that the highest levels of combined vegetable and fruit intake are associated with a 9% to 11% reduction in the risk of developing hypertension, when compared with the lowest intakes, but higher intake of Brussels sprout alone is associated with a 25% increase in the risk (112087).
• Lung cancer. Population research has found that people who consume Brussels sprout and broccoli at least once weekly have a 22% lower risk of developing lung cancer when compared with those who consume these vegetables less than once monthly (26192).
• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Population research has found that females who consume at least half a serving of Brussels sprout or other cruciferous vegetables daily have a lower risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly the follicular lymphoma subtype, when compared to those who eat these vegetables less often. However, eating Brussels sprout and other cruciferous vegetables does not appear to be associated with a reduced risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in males (26186).
• Pancreatic cancer. Population research has found that consuming higher amounts of Brussels sprout is not associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer (26181).
• Prostate cancer. Population research has found that people who consume higher amounts of Brussels sprout and other cruciferous vegetables have a lower risk of developing prostate cancer (25420,25421).
• Stroke. Population research has found that higher intake of Brussels sprout and other cruciferous vegetables is associated with a 32% reduction in the risk of ischemic stroke (7394). More evidence is needed to rate Brussels sprout for these uses.

(Read more about BRUSSELS SPROUT)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Breast engorgement. Most research shows that applying cabbage leaves to engorged breasts reduces pain and hardness to the same degree as cold compresses in lactating females with breast engorgement. Details: Several small clinical studies suggest that applying whole cabbage leaves to the engorged breasts of lactating females produces subjective relief similar to the use of chilled gel-packs (6781,6784,93677). Both chilled and room temperature cabbage leaves seem to provide the same relief (6782). Another small clinical study shows that whole cabbage leaves also seem to improve breast pain and hardness when compared with general nursing care (93673). When compared with hot and cold compresses, one small clinical study found that using chilled cabbage leaves reduces postnatal breast engorgement to a similar degree, but is not as effective for reducing pain (101966). The preparation of cabbage leaves for this purpose sometimes includes stripping out the large vein of the cabbage leaf and cutting a hole for the nipple. Cabbage leaves are rinsed and chilled. The chilled cabbage leaf is worn inside the bra or as a compress under a cool towel. This procedure is typically repeated 1-4 times daily for 1-3 days (6781,6784,93673,93677,101966). A cabbage leaf extract applied as a cream has also been tried. The cabbage leaf extract cream seems to provide subjective relief when compared to baseline, but it does not provide superior relief when compared with a placebo cream (6783).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bladder cancer. It is unclear if consuming cabbage is effective for the prevention of bladder cancer. Details: Observational research has found that eating about 1.75 cups of cruciferous vegetables such as cabbage or broccoli is associated with a 30% reduced risk of bladder cancer in men and women (14864).
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if consuming cabbage is effective for the prevention of colorectal cancer. Details: Observational research has found that consuming large amounts of cabbage and other Brassica vegetables such as kale, broccoli, and cauliflower is associated with a lower risk of developing colorectal cancer (6792).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if consuming cabbage is effective for the prevention of gastric cancer. Details: Observational research has found that consuming large amounts of cabbage and other Brassica vegetables such as kale, broccoli, and cauliflower is associated with a lower risk of developing stomach cancer (6792).
• Gastritis. Although there has been interest in using oral cabbage for gastritis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cabbage for this purpose.
• Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear if oral cabbage is beneficial in patients with hyperlipidemia. Details: A small clinical study in Japanese adults with hyperlipidemia shows that adding broccoli and cabbage to a beverage consisting of fruits and vegetables for 3-9 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 8.5% when compared to baseline. The reduction in LDL cholesterol was significant when compared with the same beverage without broccoli and cabbage added (25423).
• Knee pain. It is unclear if topical cabbage is beneficial in patients with knee pain. Details: A small clinical study in males with an acute mild to moderate traumatic knee ligament injury shows that use of crushed fresh cabbage leaf and cooling dressing wraps improves recovery over the first 24 hours of use by a moderate amount when compared with the cooling dressing alone. Normal fluid release occurred in 67% to 80% of patients using crushed cabbage leaf compared with 47% to 50% of those given the cooling dressing alone (101969).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if consuming cabbage is effective for the prevention of lung cancer. Details: Observational research has found that consuming large amounts of cabbage and other Brassica vegetables such as kale, broccoli, and cauliflower is associated with a lower risk of developing lung cancer (6792).
• Osteoarthritis. Small clinical studies suggest that topical cabbage leaf modestly improves pain and other symptoms in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Details: A small clinical study in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee shows that applying cabbage leaf wraps to the knees for at least 2 hours daily for 4 weeks decreases pain by around 12 points on a 100 mm visual analog scale when compared with usual care. The analgesic effect of cabbage leaf wraps in these patients appears to be similar to treatment with topical gel containing the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac 10 mg/gram (93671). Another small, open-label clinical study in patients with moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee shows that applying cabbage leaf wraps to the knees for 1 hour daily for 4 weeks reduces knee pain and improves symptom severity when compared with diclofenac gel applied four times daily. Improvements in pain and overall symptoms were similar between cabbage leaf and the use of cooling gel pads (110558). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of blinding.
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if consuming cabbage is effective for the prevention of pancreatic cancer. Details: Observational research in elderly and middle-aged individuals has found that consuming one or more servings of cabbage per week is associated with a 38% lower risk of developing pancreatic cancer when compared with those who do not eat cabbage (25422).
• Peptic ulcers. Although there has been interest in using oral cabbage for peptic ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cabbage for this purpose.
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if consuming cabbage is effective for the prevention of prostate cancer. Details: Some observational research has found that consuming higher amounts of cabbage and other Brassica vegetables such as kale, broccoli, and cauliflower is not associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer (25417,25419). However, other observational studies have found that consuming higher amounts of cabbage and other Brassica vegetables is associated with a lower risk of developing prostate cancer (25418,25420,25421). More evidence is needed to rate cabbage for these uses.

(Read more about CABBAGE)

EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Oral calcium carbonate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an antacid. Details: Taking calcium carbonate orally as an antacid is effective for treating dyspepsia (1843). Calcium carbonate has FDA approval as an antacid.
• Hyperkalemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities. Details: Administering calcium gluconate intravenously can reverse electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias induced by hyperkalemia (12946). Intravenous calcium gluconate is FDA-approved for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities.
• Hypocalcemia. Oral calcium treats and prevents hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium is used to treat severe hypocalcemia. Details: Taking calcium orally is effective for treating and preventing hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate, acetate, gluceptate, or chloride is effective for severe hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany (12928).
• Kidney failure. Oral calcium carbonate or calcium acetate is used as a phosphate binder during kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium carbonate or calcium acetate orally is effective as a phosphate binder. Calcium acetate (PhosLo) appears to control hyperphosphatemia better than sevelamer (Renagel) (12943,12944,38990). Calcium citrate is not recommended for this purpose because it increases aluminum absorption and does not bind phosphate as efficiently as calcium acetate or calcium carbonate (21631). Some clinical research also shows that taking calcium orally reduces blood pressure in patients with kidney failure (975).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral calcium in combination with vitamin D prevents bone density loss that occurs during long-term treatment with corticosteroids. Details: Taking calcium in combination with vitamin D as adjunctive therapy seems to be effective for reducing bone mineral density loss in people using corticosteroids long-term (982,1046,1830,1831,1832,4462,4463,4464,4465,4466)(4467,12945,38493). One specific product used in clinical research is Oscal (Marion Merrel Dow Inc.), which contains elemental calcium 500 mg per tablet plus vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (982). Another product used is Oscal 250 + D (SmithKline Beecham Healthcare), which contains elemental calcium 250 mg and vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (1046).
• Hyperparathyroidism. Oral calcium reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium orally reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with kidney failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism (1827,1828,1829,39174,39425). In elderly women, the combination of calcium and vitamin D reverses secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces hip fracture risk (8818). Also, population research suggests increased calcium intake from the diet and supplements reduces the risk of primary hyperparathyroidism in women. Supplemental intakes of at least 500 mg/day and dietary intakes of approximately 1100 mg/day are considered to be protective (91353).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate calcium intake, from the diet and/or supplements, is recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate calcium intake in line with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) by age, along with adequate vitamin D intake, for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake when adequate dietary intake is not feasible (109425). In the US and Canada, foods containing at least 200 mg calcium with less phosphorous content than calcium can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate calcium intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (11940,102148). However, calcium supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Also, calcium supplements do not seem to be effective for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) during lactation (988), in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation (1817), or in patients who have had renal transplantation (4823,38736,38871). Maximal bone growth occurs in the teenage years, and then BMD in females remains relatively constant until age 30-40. After age 40, bone loss typically occurs at rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. In males, this occurs several decades later. Bone loss is more pronounced if dietary calcium intake is below the RDA, which is the case for many Americans (2571,2578). One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy children 7-14 years old shows that fortifying food with calcium 250-1000 mg daily for up to 24 months modestly improves femoral neck BMD, but not hip or spine BMD. However, the included trials did not supplement vitamin D (107232). During the 5 years immediately after menopause, calcium supplementation has very little effect on bone loss (2569,2570,2575,2576). The rapid loss of estrogen causes a high bone resorption rate, which increases serum calcium levels and therefore decreases intestinal absorption of calcium (2570). After this period, the typical rate of bone loss is 2% per year (2572,2576). Taking calcium 1000-1600 mg daily as carbonate, citrate, lactate gluconate, or citrate malate salt decreases this rate by 0.25% to 1% annually (977,979,981,2569,2571,2572,2575,2576,2578,6850)(38978,38980,39064). The greatest reductions (1% or more) are seen in the first 1-2 years of supplementation when bone remodeling foci can be filled (2569,2576). After this period, the differences in rate of loss between supplemented and non-supplemented females are closer to 0.25% per year (2569,2577). A meta-analysis of clinical evidence suggests that there is no additional benefit after 4 years (38980). Small clinical studies have found that continuous calcium supplementation at an average daily dose of 1050 mg, started after menopause and continued for 1.5-4 years, may reduce fracture rates by 26% when compared with no calcium supplementation. The largest of these studies was conducted in nursing home residents who also received daily vitamin D; the benefits of calcium, specifically, are unclear (39386). Some research also suggests that calcium and vitamin D improves primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in some older individuals with osteoporosis, particularly the elderly and those who are no longer community dwelling (12930,38875,38849,39026,109471). However, not all research is positive. One large clinical trial in elderly adults with a low-trauma fracture show that taking calcium 1000 mg daily with or without vitamin D 800 IU daily for 2-7 years does not reduce the risk of a second fracture when compared with placebo (13073). Another clinical study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 800 IU daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (less than 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). Also, some exploratory research suggests that supplements may need to be continued indefinitely; in adults over 68 years of age, any effects of 2 years of calcium supplements on BMD appear to be lost within 2 years after discontinuing supplements (6853). Calcium has additive effects when used with other agents such as vitamin D, estrogens, or calcitonin. Whereas calcium alone generally reduces or prevents loss of BMD, combination with other agents can produce small increases in BMD ranging from 0.3% to 3.3% depending on the combination and dosages used (978,980,1836,2570,2571,2572,2576). However, one meta-analysis in healthy adults shows that fortifying foods with calcium 250-1000 mg daily, in conjunction with vitamin D supplementation, for up to 24 months does not improve BMD when compared with control (107232). The full potential of osteoporosis treatments cannot be realized without adequate calcium intake (2569,2570,2571,2572). Advise patients taking agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene (Evista) to ensure that their daily calcium intake meets the RDA. Use supplements if necessary. The usefulness of calcium in preventing osteoporosis in males is not as well-studied. Some observational research has found that calcium 870 mg daily is not associated with changes in BMD and bone loss in males (97201). However, clinical evidence suggests that taking calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years might improve trabecular or cortical bone mass by 2% to 4% (980,8827,8873). Dietary supplementation with calcium and vitamin D seems to moderately reduce bone loss measured in the femoral neck, spine, and total body, and seems to reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in older patients with osteopenia or low BMD (980).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Adequate calcium intake seems to prevent symptoms of PMS. Details: There seems to be a link between low dietary calcium intake and symptoms of PMS (2004,6847,39007). Taking calcium 1000-1336 mg daily seems to significantly reduce depressed mood, water retention, and pain, especially if daily calcium intake is inadequate (1822,1823,1824,2004,95821). Calcium carbonate 1200 mg daily seems to decrease PMS symptom scores by about 18% when compared with placebo (1822). Increasing dietary calcium intake is also associated with a decreased risk of developing PMS. Consuming an average of 1283 mg of calcium per day from foods is associated with about a 30% lower risk of developing PMS compared with consuming an average of 529 mg daily (13094); however, taking calcium supplements does not appear to be associated with the risk of developing PMS.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Oral calcium seems to be beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer, especially in those with adequate vitamin D levels and normal body mass index (BMI). Details: Population studies have found that increased intake of dietary or supplemental calcium is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas (1047,8820,12120,38951,98898,98899). Clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research also show that taking calcium supplements 1.2-2 grams daily for up to 4 years can reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence by up to 29% (970,12118,12950,15267,34596,38718,39042,95817). However, not all research has been positive. Some meta-analyses of clinical research or observational studies suggest that taking calcium does not reduce the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer (34596,39042,39349). Other contradictory research suggests that postmenopausal females who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290); however, this finding may not be reliable due to the high baseline intake of calcium in study participants. The reason for these conflicting findings is not entirely clear. Vitamin D might be an important factor. People with lower than average vitamin D levels do not seem to get any benefit from calcium supplements (12118). Also, one meta-analysis of previous trials suggests that taking calcium 1200 mg daily reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas in people with a normal BMI, but not in those who are overweight or obese (99715). Despite this conflicting evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2005 stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence to support this claim (102366).
• Fetal bone mineralization. If calcium intakes are low during pregnancy, oral calcium seems to be beneficial for increasing fetal bone density. Details: With low dietary calcium intake (less than 562 mg elemental calcium daily) during pregnancy, calcium supplementation increases fetal bone mineralization and density. However, calcium supplementation does not offer any additional benefit if calcium intakes are adequate (3263,3264).
• Hypertension. Oral calcium seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount. However, it is unclear if this reduction is clinically significant. Details: Many clinical trials and observational studies show that intake of calcium supplements or dietary calcium modestly reduces blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension, usually around 1-2 mmHg. Calcium seems to be more effective for certain subpopulations of patients, such as salt-sensitive people and patients with low baseline dietary calcium intake (945,972,974,976,984,1818,1819,1820,1821,6852)(13138,14406,38803,39063,39094,39221). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium intake during pregnancy reduces systolic blood pressure in offspring by 1-2 mmHg (38852). However, a large-scale clinical trial in postmenopausal females shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg daily does not lower blood pressure or reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials shows that taking calcium in combination with vitamin D for up to 7 years has no effect on blood pressure (98861). The validity of this finding is limited by the poor methodological quality of the included studies. Some observational research suggests that calcium can reduce the risk for hypertension. Population research in females aged 45 years and older suggests that higher intake of calcium from both diet and supplement sources is linked to a lower risk of developing hypertension when compared to lower calcium intake (14265). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension. However, the FDA has concluded that this claim is based on supporting, rather than conclusive, evidence (102367).
• Osteomalacia. Oral calcium seems to reverse osteomalacia caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Osteomalacia is commonly caused by vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to osteomalacia in children and adults. Calcium supplementation can reverse osteomalacia caused by calcium deficiency. Along with appropriate vitamin D supplementation, individuals at risk of osteomalacia need sufficient calcium intake (94819).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral calcium seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia in high risk pregnancies, especially if calcium intakes are low. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (971,38756), most clinical research shows that taking calcium orally 1-2 grams daily reduces pregnancy-related hypertension and pre-eclampsia (973,1833,8828,39043,39319,39426,96480). Calcium appears to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia by about 50% when compared with placebo. One meta-analysis of 19 controlled trials involving over 29,000 pregnancies found that for every 19 females treated with calcium, one episode of pre-eclampsia would be avoided (96480). Calcium appears to have the greatest effect in individuals at high-risk of pre-eclampsia or with low calcium levels, and when taken at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation (15029,38497,96480,99714). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding the use of calcium supplements to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. However, due to the limited and conflicting research available at that time, the FDA stated that this outcome was highly unlikely. Since then, large, high-quality clinical research has supported this finding. In fact, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released a recommendation to prescribe oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancies at high risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary calcium intakes are low, in order to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).
• Rickets. Oral calcium seems to reverse rickets caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Rickets is commonly caused be vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to rickets. Calcium supplementation can reverse rickets caused by calcium deficiency (94819). A small clinical study in children with nutritional rickets shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily for 24 weeks improves radiographically measured rickets caused by calcium deficiency. Rickets seems to improve more rapidly with calcium 1000 mg compared to calcium 500 mg. However, increasing the calcium dose to 2000 mg daily is not more beneficial than calcium 1000 mg daily (98904).
• Tooth retention. Oral calcium with vitamin D seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral calcium does not seem to be beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Although some population research disagrees (15631,39041,95811,107237), most research shows that increased calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (15631,16715,98895,107236,107237). Subgroup analyses of population research suggest that calcium intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, adults (15631,107237). Another subgroup analysis in a large meta-analysis of population research also suggests that dietary intake may reduce estrogen receptor(ER)-negative breast cancer, but not ER-positive breast cancer (107236). However, most other research has not evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation or intake on breast cancer subtypes. The best evidence to date, from a large scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years after menopause does not reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer at the end of the study and 5 years after the end of the intervention (16715,98895).
• Fractures. Although oral calcium prevents fractures in osteoporosis, most evidence shows that calcium does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis discussion for more information on the use of calcium for this purpose. Details: The most recent and robust meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium supplementation with or without vitamin D is NOT associated with reduced fractures in older adults without osteoporosis (95822). A large-scale study in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years suggests calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D 400 IU daily for 7 years only modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) and does not significantly reduce fracture risk. This lack of effect may have been due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. In those who were 80% adherent, the combination of calcium plus vitamin D reduced the risk of hip fracture by about 29% (14282). Also, some clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 5 years does not attenuate loss of height after menopause when compared with placebo (95810). Additional meta-analyses of clinical and observational evidence suggest that calcium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, such as hip fractures (38589,38888,98895). Some other research has suggested that calcium in combination with vitamin D reduces fracture risk in older patients without osteoporosis (980,1836,8818,12930,12933,12952,38849,102145,107235); however, this research is confounded by a number of variables, including the presence of hormonal therapy and differing levels of fracture risk at baseline (1836,8818,95822). Conflicting findings on this topic might also be due to genetic differences in patient populations. A population analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study found that, in older females with the lowest genetic susceptibility to low bone mineral density (BMD), taking calcium with vitamin D is associated with a reduction in fracture risk. However, in females with a higher genetic susceptibility to low BMD, there is no association between supplementation and fracture risk. This might be because individuals with a lower susceptibility to low BMD are also more responsive to calcium and vitamin D supplementation (97357). As of April 2018, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with vitamin D >400 IU daily along with calcium >1000 mg daily is safe and effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture. USPSTF recommends against supplementing with calcium 1000 mg daily or less along with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal females (95695).
• Obesity. Oral calcium does not seem to improve weight loss. Details: Observational research has found that adults and children with low calcium intake are more likely to gain weight, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and be overweight or obese when compared to people with high calcium intake (12124,12125,12126,12127,14265). Additional observational research has found that increasing calcium intake is associated with weight loss in females; the results in males have been conflicting (12127,15602,15603). Despite these findings from observational research and a few small clinical studies (12128,15397,14438,98905), most clinical research has found that increased calcium intake does not increase weight loss (12052,13138,15396,15399,38985,39004,97356). The most recent meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies shows that daily dietary and supplemental calcium intake that meets the dietary reference intake (DRI) of 1000 mg or more daily does not increase weight loss in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when compared with intake below the DRI (95813). An older meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials also shows that increased dietary and supplemental calcium intake does not increase weight loss (15605).
• Overall mortality. Oral calcium does not seem to reduce overall mortality. Details: While some population research has found that calcium taken in combination with vitamin D in older females is associated with a lower risk of death (97353), most evidence shows that calcium, with or without vitamin D, has no effect on all-cause mortality (93533,97308).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral calcium does not reduce the risk of developing CVD and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Clinical research shows that calcium does not decrease CVD risk. Several separate meta-analyses of clinical and population research involving over 50,000 patients show that taking calcium 600-1200 mg daily for up to 7 years does not reduce the risk of CVD-related outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or overall mortality (39018,91350,92994,93533,97308,98902,107231,107233). No association was found between total dietary or supplemental calcium intake with or without vitamin D and the risk of CVD or mortality (91350,93533,97308). In fact, some population and clinical research has found that when calcium is used alone or with vitamin D, there is an INCREASED risk of CVD and coronary heart disease (38077,107233). However, other clinical research disagrees (93533). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease by 1.1-1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Intravenous calcium does not prevent nerve pain in patients given oxaliplatin. Oral calcium has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: While pooled analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials suggest that calcium and magnesium infusion decreases the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials shows that the infusion has no effect in preventing neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). Additionally, clinical trials show that administering calcium gluconate 1 gram with magnesium sulfate 1 gram intravenously immediately before, or before and after, the administration of a single oxaliplatin cycle (90005), or over the entire 6-cycle course of oxaliplatin, does not improve symptoms of neurotoxicity when compared with placebo (96474).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral calcium does not prevent MI. When taken in the absence of vitamin D, oral calcium may increase the risk of MI. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of calcium is associated with a decreased risk of MI (91350). However, a 2010 meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking calcium at a dose of at least 500 mg daily is associated with an approximate 30% INCREASE in the risk of MI in patients over the age of 40. According to this analysis, one additional case of MI will occur for every 69 patients that take calcium for 5 years (17482). A more recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of MI by 1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research studied postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233) In contrast, other meta-analyses of clinical research have shown that taking calcium for up to 7 years is NOT associated with an increased risk of MI, including a meta-analysis that only included postmenopausal females (93533,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI in postmenopausal females (93533). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for alcohol use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 800 mg and vitamin D 200 IU orally daily for 14 days modestly reduces alcohol craving scores and withdrawal scores when compared with placebo in adults with alcohol dependence that are undergoing withdrawal. Taking calcium carbonate did not reduce the need for diazepam; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (107234).
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for atherosclerosis. Details: A population study has found that taking calcium 1.2 grams daily for 3 years has no effect on carotid intima thickness or carotid atherosclerosis incidence. A total calcium intake (dietary and supplemental) of at least 1794 mg daily in older females may be associated with a decreased risk of carotid atherosclerosis when compared with a total calcium intake below 1010 mg daily (97351).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the odds of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. Details: A small observational study found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a 52% reduced odds of an autism spectrum disorder in the offspring (98900).
• Cancer. Oral calcium alone does not seem to prevent cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Taking calcium alone does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of cancer (12118,15629). The role of calcium in cancer prevention when taken along with vitamin D is controversial, as conflicting results exist. One clinical trial shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1400-1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1100 IU daily have a 60% lower relative risk for developing cancer of any type. Approximately 25 postmenopausal females would need to take this combination for 4 years to prevent one occurrence of cancer (15629). However, a more recent clinical study shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of cancer at 4 years (93943). Reasons for the disparate results are not entirely clear. The discrepancies do not appear to be related to baseline vitamin D levels or different study populations. It is possible that, given the 10-year time lapse between the two publications, the discrepancies result from differences in cancer detection capability. Also, since cancer risk was a secondary outcome measure in the earlier study and a primary outcome measure in the more recent study, it is possible that the discrepancies result from differences in statistical methodologies. The effect of vitamin D and calcium on cancer risk in males and younger patients is not known. There is also interest in using calcium for reducing the risk of hematological malignancies. An analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU for up to 10 years is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of hematologic malignancies when compared with placebo. However, no effect on hematologic malignancy related mortality was seen (97354).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between a higher dietary intake of calcium and the risk of depression when compared with a lower dietary intake of calcium (96480).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for type 2 diabetes prevention. Details: Some population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet or supplements, alone or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713,96473). However, population research is often limited by confounding variables. For example, one analysis found that any beneficial effect might be influenced by concomitant magnesium intake (96473). Furthermore, other population research has found that serum calcium levels higher than 9.6 mg/dL are associated with greater risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults with osteoporosis. This study is limited because it was not determined whether increased serum calcium was due to increased calcium intake or another factor such as parathyroid function (95815).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing pain associated with dysmenorrhea. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg with vitamin D 5000 IU daily for three menstrual cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (95821). However, calcium carbonate 1000 mg taken alone seems to reduce pain when compared with placebo.
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but dietary calcium does not seem to have any effect (38893).
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing falls. Details: Research suggests that calcium in combination with vitamin D, but not calcium alone, might prevent falls by decreasing body sway and normalizing systolic blood pressure (6362,11939,39038). Some experts think the combination of calcium and vitamin D may be important (11916). Preliminary clinical research in adults residing in a health care facility shows that taking vitamin D supplements while increasing dietary calcium and protein for 2 years reduces falls by 11% when compared with standard diets. Intervention diets were supplemented with milk, yogurt, and cheese to provide calcium 1142 mg and protein 69 grams daily (107235). There might also be different effects in females compared to males. In one study, females aged 65 years or older who took vitamin D 700 IU plus calcium citrate 500 mg daily over a 3-year period had a 46% lower risk of falling. However, this combination did not decrease falls in males (14291).
• Fluorosis. Oral calcium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking calcium orally, in combination with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and vitamin D, seems to be effective for reducing excessive fluoride levels in children and improving symptoms of fluorosis in children aged 6-12 years (990).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral calcium in combination with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing heart failure. Details: Based on a secondary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), taking calcium 1000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily does not reduce the risk of heart failure in the overall population or in individuals at high risk. However, in a subgroup of postmenopausal females without risk factors for heart failure, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of developing heart failure by about 37% (97307).
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for hypercholesterolemia. Details: Some evidence shows that taking calcium carbonate 400 mg three times daily reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4% and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 4% after 6 weeks of treatment when used in combination with a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) (2557). In contrast, a study in females with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 800 mg daily for 2 years might INCREASE total cholesterol levels by about 12 mg/dL when compared with placebo. This same study showed an association between calcium supplementation and an increase in total cholesterol levels and carotid intimal thickness in postmenopausal females, but not premenopausal females (97350). A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials which included both healthy patients and patients with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily and vitamin D 200-7142 IU daily modestly improves HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplementation is more effective in patients with dyslipidemia at baseline. It is unclear if this effect is due to calcium, vitamin D, or the combination (107227). However, other research shows that taking a specific supplement containing calcium 600 mg plus vitamin D 200 IU (Caltrate 600 D, Wyeth Consumer Healthcare Inc.) twice daily in combination with calorie restriction does not reduce total or LDL cholesterol levels when compared with placebo (15601).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing blood levels of lead. Details: Lead is mobilized along with calcium from bone during pregnancy and lactation, resulting in increased serum concentrations of lead. One clinical study suggests that calcium supplementation does not significantly decrease these elevated lead concentrations (1586). However, another clinical study suggests that taking calcium reduces blood lead levels by 11% when compared with placebo, with greatest effects observed in those with high baseline levels of lead (38957).
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral calcium for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of calcium for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium alone or with vitamin D is beneficial for metabolic syndrome prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet and supplements alone, or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713).
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing nephrotic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium 500-1000 mg daily for 3 months in combination with vitamin D3 60,000 IU daily or weekly for 4 weeks has no effect on bone mineral density or the risk of relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (97355).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking calcium alone or with vitamin D3 1000 IU daily reduced the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but had no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma (104622).
• Oral mucositis. When used in combination with fluoride treatments, a calcium phosphate mouth rinse seems to prevent and reduce mucositis-related pain in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that using a particular mouth rinse (Caphosol, EUSA Pharma) containing calcium phosphate, in combination with fluoride treatments, reduces days of mucositis, the duration of pain, and the dose and days of morphine used when compared with placebo and fluoride treatment (38611).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: An older meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (38792). However, a more recent pooled analysis of 15 cohort and case-control studies has found that the highest intake of dietary or dairy calcium is associated with a 20% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared to the lowest intake (97349).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing postpartum depression risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium 2 grams daily beginning at 11-21 weeks gestation reduces depression at 12 weeks postpartum when compared with placebo. However, no benefit is seen at 6 weeks postpartum (39447).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing leg cramps during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking calcium 1 gram twice daily (as a mixture of salts) for 2 weeks can reduce pregnancy-related leg cramps during the second half of pregnancy when compared with no treatment (2567).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily might decrease the risk of developing prostate cancer (14133). However, some epidemiological research suggests that consuming very high doses of calcium, over 2000 mg daily, might actually increase the risk of developing prostate cancer (14134). Some epidemiological research also suggests that doses greater than 1500 mg daily increase the risk of poorly differentiated, clinically advanced, and fatal prostate cancer (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer (98894). However, contradictory research suggests that there is no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall risk of prostate cancer (14131,14132,104630).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Some population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke (4822,38678). However, other population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is not associated with a decreased risk of stroke (91350). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years does not affect the risk of stroke when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females, and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Vertigo. Oral calcium with vitamin D might reduce positional vertigo; the effect of calcium when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking calcium 500 mg and vitamin D 400 IU twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate calcium for these uses.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Diabetic neuropathy. Applying a specific prescription patch containing capsaicin 8% or a specific cream containing capsaicin 0.075% can reduce pain in diabetic neuropathy. Details: Clinical research has evaluated the use of a specific patch (Qutenza, NeurogesX Inc.) containing capsaicin 8%, which is approved as a prescription medication by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The research in this population shows that a single application of the patch on the painful parts of the feet for 30-90 minutes following pretreatment with topical anesthetics reduces pain for up to 12 weeks when compared with placebo (40719,96453). Patients using the patch experience reduced sleep interference and an average 28% reduction in pain, compared with a 21% reduction with placebo. Additionally, 50% of patients receiving the patch experience pain relief within 19 days, compared to 72 days for those receiving placebo (96453). A meta-analysis of the available clinical research for diabetic peripheral neuropathy found that one-time application of this patch is equally effective to duloxetine 20-120 mg daily, pregabalin 75-600 mg daily, and gabapentin 300-3600 mg daily in producing a 30% or 50% pain reduction. The dose of oral medication used in the evaluated studies did not impact the comparative efficacy of the capsaicin patch (96450). Other clinical research shows that applying cream containing capsaicin 0.075% four times daily for 8 weeks reduces pain intensity when compared with placebo in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (40547,40592,40607). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that applying cream containing capsaicin 0.075% reduces pain similarly to 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster (40674). Topical cream containing capsaicin 0.075% (Zostrix-HP, Link Medical Products Pty Ltd.) is FDA-approved as an over-the-counter (OTC) medication for this indication (272). However, applying a capsaicin lotion less frequently or with a lower concentration of capsaicin does not seem to be beneficial. A small clinical study in patients with diabetic neuropathy shows that applying a specific lotion (Capsika-75 lotion, Bangkok Drug Company) containing capsaicin 0.075% three times daily for 8 weeks improves pain to a similar degree as a placebo lotion (102277). This study was limited by a high dropout rate, high placebo effect, and poor adherence to therapy. Furthermore, cream or gel (such as Capsika-25 gel, Bangkok Drug Company) containing lower amounts of capsaicin do not appear to be effective for reducing diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain (92984).
• Pain (chronic). Topical cream containing capsaicin can reduce chronic pain associated with various conditions. Topical capsaicin is FDA-approved for this use. Details: Several clinical studies show that topically applying cream containing capsaicin, the active capsicum constituent, 0.05% to 0.075% temporarily relieves chronic pain from rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, back pain, jaw pain, psoriasis, and neuropathic conditions (12401,17701). Capsaicin, used in topical preparations, is FDA-approved for these uses (272). It can take up to 14 days for the full analgesic effect. For neuropathic pain, the number needed to treat using capsaicin 0.075% for eight weeks is 5.7 (12401). For musculoskeletal pain, for every 8.1 patients treated with capsaicin 0.025%, 1 patient would achieve at least a 50% reduction in pain (12401). Also, applying capsaicin 0.05% (Finalgon CPD Warmecreme) three times daily for 21 days seems to cause a 49% reduction in chronic soft tissue pain when compared with placebo (17701).
• Postherpetic neuralgia. Applying a specific prescription patch containing capsaicin can reduce postherpetic neuralgia pain, especially in patients with the lowest pain scores. Details: Clinical research has evaluated the use of a specific patch (Qutenza, NeurogesX Inc.) containing capsaicin 8%, which is approved as a prescription medication by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Research in this population shows that applying a single patch for 60-90 minutes reduces average pain over 24 hours by 27% to 37% for up to 12 weeks, compared to only 4.4% to 26% in patients in the control group (40659,40679,40686,40691,40719,40728,40800,92985,96451,96452). The number needed to treat to achieve at least a 30% or 50% reduction in pain intensity is 10 and 12, respectively; the number needed to treat to achieve an additional beneficial outcome over placebo at 8 weeks and 12 weeks is 9 and 7, respectively (40800,96451). The pain reduction with this patch has an onset of a few days after treatment and the effect lasts for about 5 months (92986). However, some evidence shows that the reduction in pain is only significant for patients who have had postherpetic neuralgia for at least 6 months (40686). Additionally, the reduction in pain and duration of response appears to be greatest for patients with lower pain scores and low sensitivity to light touch at baseline, as well as patients not using concomitant systemic neuropathic pain medications, whereas patients with high pain scores, high sensitivity to touch, or those using systemic neuropathic pain medications experience the smallest and least sustained reduction in pain (40728,96458). Also, other evidence suggests that this patch may be less effective at relieving postherpetic neuralgia when compared with 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster (40688).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Back pain. Topical capsicum or capsaicin seems to be beneficial for reducing back pain. Details: A meta-analysis of generally low-quality clinical research, as well as individual studies, show that applying a capsicum-containing plaster providing 11 mg of capsaicin per plaster or 22 mcg of capsaicin per square centimeter of plaster to the back once daily in the morning for 4-8 hours reduces low back pain when compared with placebo (15259,15260,15261). Applying capsaicin 0.05% (Finalgon CPD Warmecreme) three times daily for 21 days seems to cause a 58% reduction in low back pain when compared with placebo (17701). Also, in a mixed group of patients with acute back or neck pain, a large clinical trial shows that four topical applications with a gel containing capsaicin 0.075% with diclofenac 2% every 12 hours modestly reduces pain on motion when compared with diclofenac alone or placebo. The number of patients with at least a 50% reduction in pain from baseline was modestly higher. Capsaicin 0.075% was similarly effective alone and when combined with diclofenac 2% (105202). However, only about half of the patients in this study had back pain.
• Cluster headache. Intranasal capsaicin seems to be beneficial for preventing cluster headaches. Its effect in the treatment of cluster headache is unclear. Details: Some clinical research shows that using the capsicum constituent capsaicin intranasally reduces the frequency of episodic or chronic cluster headache attacks (14323,14351,14352,14358). Capsaicin suspensions of 0.1 mL of a 10 mM suspension, providing 300 mcg/day of capsaicin, has been applied to the ipsilateral nostril. Applications are continued once daily until a burning sensation is no longer experienced (14351,14358). Intranasal application of capsaicin 0.025% (Zostrix, Rodlen Laboratories) might also decrease symptom severity during an acute cluster headache attack. Clinical research shows that daily treatment for 7 days decreases symptom severity over the following week (14353). Ipsilateral, or same side, nostril application of capsaicin appears to be more effective than contralateral application (14351). Due to severe pain associated with intranasal capsaicin administration, pretreatment with intranasal local anesthetic is usually used.
• Nonallergic rhinitis. Intranasal capsaicin in a dose of at least 0.1 mM seems to improve symptoms of nonallergic rhinitis. It is unclear if lower doses of capsaicin are beneficial. Details: Clinical research shows that repeated intranasal in-clinic treatments with capsaicin, the active capsicum constituent, or with capsicum oleoresin, over a period of one to three days, can significantly decrease symptoms of non-allergic, non-infectious perennial rhinitis symptoms (14328,14357,15016,40595,105204,105205). A decrease of symptoms has been observed for up to 6-9 months following these treatments (14328,14357). The following doses have been used: capsaicin 0.15 mg per dose for up to 7 doses over a 14-day period (14328), capsaicin 0.0033 mol once weekly for 5 weeks (14357), capsaicin 15 mcg/0.1 mL applied three times daily for 3 days (15016), and capsaicin 1-4 mcg per puff, applied 3 times in each nostril daily for 3 days (40595). Due to severe pain associated with intranasal capsaicin administration, pretreatment with intranasal local anesthetic is usually used. Personal use of an intranasal spray with a lower dose of capsaicin might also be effective. Clinical research shows that two 0.4 mL puffs with an intranasal spray in each nostril daily for 4 weeks providing capsaicin 0.01 mM, but not 0.001 mM, is more effective than placebo for reducing symptoms of idiopathic rhinitis. This benefit is maintained for an additional 8 weeks. This protocol was at least as effective as receiving five repeated hourly intranasal spray treatments in hospital with capsaicin 0.1 mM (105204).
• Osteoarthritis. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) conditionally recommends topical capsaicin for knee osteoarthritis, but not for hip or hand osteoarthritis. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 preliminary clinical trials shows that using topical capsaicin 0.025% four times daily has modest benefit for osteoarthritis when compared with placebo. Using capsaicin 0.0125% doesn't seem to be effective (102408). The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) conditionally recommends topical capsaicin for knee osteoarthritis. However, it does not recommend its use for hip osteoarthritis due to the depth of the joint beneath the skin surface, nor for hand osteoarthritis, due to the risk for contamination of the eye (102114).
• Pain (acute). Topical capsicum seems to be beneficial for reducing acute pain due to trauma. Details: Clinical research in patients with trauma-related acute pain shows that topical application with a gel (Sanli Gel) containing capsaicin 0.05% three times daily for 3 days reduces pain by at least 50% in 87% of patients, compared with 63% of those using a piroxicam gel 0.5% (Felden). There was also a significantly greater number of patients with a final pain score of 4 or less. In the capsaicin group, only 12% of patients did not achieve either of these endpoints, compared with 31% in the group receiving piroxicam (105197).
• Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Applying topical capsicum to acupoints seems to be beneficial for preventing PONV. Details: Clinical research shows that applying a capsicum-containing plaster to acupoints on the hand and forearm 30 minutes prior to anesthesia and leaving in place for 6-8 hours daily for up to 3 days after surgery reduces the incidence of PONV by about 29% to 36% when compared to control (40405,40483,40610). Plasters used in these studies included Sinsin PAS (Sinsin Pharm Co.), which is standardized to contain capsicum 345.8 mg and capsicum tincture 34.58 mg per sheet (40405,40610); and Johnson's Perforated Capsicum Plaster (Johnson & Johnson Ltd.), which is standardized to contain capsicum oleoresin 1% w/w (40483).
• Postoperative pain. Applying topical capsicum-containing plaster to acupoints seems to be beneficial for reducing postoperative pain. It is unclear if a capsicum patch or capsaicin instillation prior to wound closure is beneficial for reducing postoperative pain. Details: Some clinical research shows that applying a capsicum-containing plaster to acupoints on the hands or near the knees of adults or children 30 minutes prior to anesthesia, and leaving in place for 6-8 hours daily for up to 3 days after surgery, reduces the amount of rescue analgesics needed by 29% to 39% within the first 24 hours and by 16% to 19% within the first 48 hours when compared to control (40405,40483,40520,40524,40610). The capsicum-containing plaster used in these studies (Sinsin PAS, Sinsin Pharm Co.) is standardized to contain capsicum 345.8 mg and capsicum tincture 34.58 mg per sheet (40520,40610). Other preliminary clinical research shows that applying a single patch containing the capsicum constituent capsaicin 8% (Qutenza, NeurogesX Inc.) for 30-60 minutes leads to an improvement in overall health status and an average 22% reduction in pain that lasts up to 12 weeks in patients with postoperative and posttraumatic neuropathic pain. Patches were applied to various parts of the body, including the legs, torso, feet, hands, arms, head, and neck, and the reduction in pain continued with the use of a second and third patch application. The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group (96452). Other clinical evidence suggests that instilling capsaicin 15 mg during surgery immediately prior to wound closure reduces the need for pain medication for up to 2 weeks postoperatively when compared with placebo (40741).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if intranasal capsaicin is beneficial for preventing allergic rhinitis symptoms. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that intranasal treatment with cotton wads soaked in the active capsicum constituent capsaicin 30 mcM, applied for 15 minutes and repeated over two days, reduces the severity of experimentally-induced allergic rhinitis. The severity of symptoms seems to be reduced for up to 2 months after treatment (14324). However, contradictory research shows that patients with allergic rhinitis caused by house dust mites do not have significantly improved symptoms after using a capsaicin solution providing 0.15 mg/dose for up to 7 doses over a 14-day period when compared with placebo (14360).
• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). Although there is interest in using oral capsicum for ALS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of capsicum for this condition.
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral capsaicin is beneficial for improving athletic performance; the available research is limited to small, conflicting studies. Details: Several small clinical studies in physically active young adults show that taking capsaicin might improve some measures of athletic performance, but results are mixed overall (99409,99410,102276,105191,105198,105200). A meta-analysis of these and several other small clinical studies shows that taking the capsicum constituents capsaicin or capsiate 45 minutes before exercise improves measures of muscular endurance but does not improve aerobic endurance when compared with placebo. Doses of the capsicum constituents ranged from 1.2-24 mg, with most studies assessing a single 12 mg dose (111515). The included studies have a number of methodological problems that limit the validity of the findings, such as a small sample size, short study duration, and insufficient blinding. Also, most of the study participants were male. Other small clinical studies not included in the meta-analysis also show conflicting results. One small clinical study in untrained young adults undergoing resistance training shows that taking capsiate, a capsaicin analog, 6 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks improves upper body, but not lower body, weightlifting performance when compared with placebo (109024). However, another small clinical trial in experienced male athletes shows that taking cayenne (GNC Nature's Fingerprint Cayenne Herbal Supplement) 3 grams, providing capsaicin 25.8 mg, daily for 7 days does not improve sprint time, rate of perceived exertion, or muscle soreness over three days when compared with placebo (105206). Capsicum has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. One small clinical study in untrained males shows that taking a supplement containing capsicum extract 66.7 mg, caffeine 400 mg, black pepper extract 10 mg, and niacin 40 mg prior to exercising does not improve strength, time to exhaustion, or maximal oxygen consumption when compared with placebo (37873).
• Burning mouth syndrome. It is unclear if applying topical capsaicin in the mouth is beneficial for burning mouth syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical studies show that using 15 mL of a mouth rinse containing the active capsicum constituent capsaicin 0.02% for 30 seconds daily for 7-21 days modestly decreases burning discomfort when compared to baseline in patients with burning mouth syndrome (92991,105195). Other preliminary clinical research shows that applying 0.5 mL of a gel containing capsaicin 0.01% or 0.025% to the tongue three times daily for 14 days modestly reduces pain when compared to baseline in patients with burning mouth syndrome. The gel is spread with a cotton swab, and no food or drink is consumed for 30 minutes after application (96456). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group, the small number of patients, and occasionally unclear statistical comparisons.
• Cancer. It is unclear if eating more chili is beneficial for preventing mortality due to cancer. Details: Population research has found that consuming chili more than four times weekly is not associated with a reduced odds of cancer mortality (105208). Also, other population research has found that any consumption of hot red chili peppers is not associated with a reduced odds of mortality related to cancer (105210).
• Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS). Preliminary clinical research suggests that topical capsaicin might be beneficial for reducing symptoms of CHS. Details: One small clinical study in adults presenting to an emergency department (ED) with CHS shows that applying 5 grams of a cream containing capsaicin 0.1% to the abdomen modestly reduces nausea severity at 60 minutes, but not 30 minutes, when compared with a placebo cream. Nausea was completely resolved in 29% of patients, compared with 0% of those using the placebo cream. However, there was no difference in vomiting at 30 or 120 minutes (105193). This study may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference in some of these outcomes. A meta-analysis of two small, low-quality studies involving the topical use of capsaicin on the abdomen, chest, and possibly back, shows that the mean time to resolution of symptoms was 326 minutes and the mean length of stay in the emergency department was 379 minutes. However, it is unclear how these times compare to the use of placebo or standard antiemetics. This study also conducted a systematic review of the available literature, which indicates that the creams most commonly used in research provide 0.025% to 0.1% capsaicin (105201). Two low-quality, retrospective reviews also suggest that capsaicin cream may be beneficial for CHS. A retrospective review of patients in the ED with CHS has found that applying capsaicin cream 0.025% is associated with a 39% shorter time to discharge when compared with control. Patients treated with capsaicin also required fewer additional rescue treatments when compared with control (109021). Another retrospective review of patients in the ED with CHS also suggests that capsaicin cream 0.025% modestly reduces abdominal pain when compared with baseline. However, 47% and 28% of patients, respectively, received additional antiemetics or an opioid after the use of the cream (105345).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if eating more chili is beneficial for preventing mortality due to CVD. Details: Population research has found that consuming chili more than four times weekly is associated with a 34% reduced odds of CVD mortality when compared with never or rarely consuming chili, as well as 44% and 61% reduced odds of ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular death, respectively (105208). Other population research has found that consumption of hot red chili peppers is not associated with a reduced odds of mortality related to CVD when compared with not eating hot red chili peppers (105210).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral capsaicin is beneficial for gestational diabetes. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking chili powder containing capsaicin 5 mg daily for 4 weeks modestly reduces total cholesterol levels and reduces postprandial blood glucose levels by an average of 36 mg/dL and postprandial insulin levels by an average of 14 IU/L in patients with gestational diabetes. Compared to a placebo group, these changes are significant. However, capsaicin intake does not alter fasting plasma glucose or insulin levels (96457).
• Dry skin. It is unclear if oral capsicum is beneficial for dry skin. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adult females with low skin moisture shows that taking paprika oil extract 400 mg, standardized to include 9 mg of xanthophyll, orally daily for 4 weeks improves skin moisture and viscoelasticity scores, but not the number of wrinkles, when compared with control (109026).
• Dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral capsicum is beneficial for reducing lipid levels. Details: A meta-analysis of three or four mainly small clinical trials in healthy adults shows that taking capsicum does not improve levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol when compared with no treatment or placebo. However, there was a small to moderate effect on levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Freshly chopped chili or fermented red pepper were studied for 4 and 12 weeks, respectively (105194). It is unclear if capsicum can lower lipid levels in patients with dyslipidemia or hyperlipidemia.
• Dyspepsia. It is unclear if oral capsicum is beneficial for dyspepsia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking red pepper powder 2.5 grams daily in three divided doses for 5 weeks reduces symptoms of functional dyspepsia when compared with placebo. However, in some patients, there seems to be a worsening of symptoms prior to any improvement (12410).
• Fibromyalgia. It is unclear if oral capsicum is beneficial for fibromyalgia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying cream containing the active capsicum constituent capsaicin 0.025% four times daily to tender points for 4 weeks reduces localized tenderness in patients with fibromyalgia (7038). Other preliminary clinical research shows that applying capsaicin 0.075% cream (Sensedol) three times daily to tender points for 6 weeks in addition to standard therapy increases the pain threshold when compared with standard therapy in patients with severe fibromyalgia (92979). However, capsaicin does not appear to reduce overall pain or improve physical function in patients with fibromyalgia (7038,92979). Also, the long-term effects of capsaicin on fibromyalgia-related pain are unclear.
• Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Although there is interest in using oral capsicum for GERD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of capsicum for this condition.
• HIV/AIDS-related peripheral neuropathy. It is unclear if topical capsaicin is beneficial for this condition. Details: There is conflicting evidence regarding the effects of Qutenza (NeurogesX Inc.), which contains the active constituent of capsicum, capsaicin 8%. Although some research shows it reduces pain in patients with HIV and peripheral neuropathy (22395), other research shows no significant benefit (40746). A meta-analysis of results from both of these studies shows that applying a single capsaicin 8% patch for 30-90 minutes reduces pain intensity by at least 30% in about 30% more patients when compared to control (40800). Additional meta-analyses of the results from these two studies suggests that pain reduction with capsaicin begins a few days after treatment and lasts for about 5 months, with a number needed to treat of 11 to achieve at least a 30% reduction in pain intensity (92986,96451). Reduction in pain and duration of response appears to be greatest for females with lower pain scores at baseline, whereas males with high pain scores at baseline experience the smallest and least sustained reduction in pain (96458). Some research has also evaluated topical capsaicin 0.075%. One small clinical study shows that applying this cream does not relieve symptoms of HIV-associated peripheral neuropathy when compared with placebo (3891).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral capsicum is beneficial for lowering blood pressure. Details: Two meta-analyses of small clinical trials show that taking capsicum as freshly chopped chili, fermented red pepper, red pepper capsules, or capsinoid capsules orally daily for 4-12 weeks does not reduce systolic or diastolic blood pressure when compared with control. However, most subjects included in these clinical trials did not have hypertension (105194,109025).
• Intermetatarsal neuroma. It is unclear if injecting capsaicin into the third intermetatarsal space is beneficial for intermetatarsal neuroma. Details: Clinical research in adults with intermetatarsal neuroma shows that a single injection of capsaicin 0.1 mg into the third intermetatarsal space 5 minutes after administration of 2 mL of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine leads to a modest reduction in pain at weeks 1 and 4, but not weeks 2 and 3, when compared with placebo. Capsaicin also reduces the extent to which pain interferes with walking and mood, but not with work, sleep, relationships, or general activity (96454).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). It is unclear if oral capsicum is beneficial for IBS. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking ground guajillo chili 1 gram, containing capsaicin 0.112%, with each meal for 7 days does not reduce symptoms of IBS (12403). A small clinical study shows that taking chili (Nguan Soon Co., Ltd.) 2.1 grams, providing 2.5 mg capsaicin, daily before meals for 6 weeks does not improve abdominal burning, fecal urgency, or abdominal pain or bloating after a spicy meal. However, there was a modest reduction in abdominal burning after a spicy meal (105207). This study may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference in some of these outcomes.
• Laryngitis. Although there is interest in gargling with capsicum for laryngitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of capsicum for this condition.
• Motion sickness. Although there is interest in oral capsicum for motion sickness, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of capsicum for this condition.
• Myofascial pain syndrome. It is unclear if topical capsaicin is beneficial for myofascial pain syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a specific capsaicin cream (Dipental Cream, Dalim BioTech) containing capsaicin 0.25 mg/gram along with a ketoprofen 30 mg patch (KetotopVRPlaster, Pacific Pharma) to the trapezius does not reduce pain when compared with a ketoprofen patch alone in patients with myofascial pain (92983).
• Neck pain. It is unclear if topical capsaicin is beneficial for neck pain. Details: In a group of patients with acute back or neck pain, a large clinical trial shows that four topical applications with a gel containing capsaicin 0.075% with diclofenac 2% every 12 hours modestly reduces pain on motion when compared with diclofenac alone or placebo. The number of patients with at least a 50% reduction in pain from baseline was modestly higher. Capsaicin 0.075% was similarly effective alone or when combined with diclofenac 2% (105202). However, only about half of the patients in this study had neck pain.
• Neuropathic pain. It is unclear if topical capsicum is beneficial for neuropathic pain. Details: A very small study in adults with neuropathic pain secondary to spinal cord injury shows that applying a patch containing the capsicum constituent capsaicin 8% for 60 minutes daily to the affected area for 12 weeks reduces pain at weeks 2 and 4 and improves mobility, but not quality of life, for up to 12 weeks when compared with placebo (111517). The validity of these findings is limited by insufficient blinding and the small sample size.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral capsicum is beneficial for obesity. Details: A meta-analysis of 3-5 small clinical trials shows that taking capsicum does not reduce body weight, body fat, or body mass index (BMI) in individuals with a BMI of at least 25 kg/m2 when compared with placebo or no treatment. Freshly chopped chili, fermented red pepper, or capsicum constituents were studied for 4-12 weeks (105194). In one clinical trial included in the analysis, taking capsinoids 3 mg twice daily 30 minutes prior to eating for 12 weeks reduced abdominal fat by about 1%, but did not significantly reduce body weight, when compared with placebo (40599). In overweight individuals, one small clinical trial shows that taking a specific chili extract 200 mg, formulated with fenugreek dietary fiber for sustained release (Capsifen, Akay Natural Ingredients), providing capsaicinoids 4 mg daily for 28 days reduces body weight and BMI by about 2% when compared with placebo. There was no effect on blood pressure (105196). Capsicum has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients, with some evidence of benefit. One study evaluated a combination product (Prograde Metabolism) containing capsicum extract (Capsimax, OmniActive Health Technologies), raspberry ketone (Razberi K, Integrity Nutraceuticals), caffeine, garlic root extract, ginger root extract, bitter orange fruit (Advantra Z, Nutratech Inc), L-theanine, and black pepper fruit extract (Biperine, Sabinsa Corporation) twice daily for 8 weeks (40802).
• Overall mortality. Eating chili may be beneficial for preventing mortality. It is unclear if taking capsicum supplements is beneficial for preventing overall mortality. Details: Population research has found that consuming chili is associated with a reduced risk of overall mortality. In one study, eating chili more than four times weekly was associated with a 23% reduced odds of overall mortality when compared with never or rarely consuming chili (105208). Other population research has found that any consumption of hot red chili peppers is associated with a 13% reduced odds of mortality when compared with not eating these peppers (105210). Also, eating spicy foods at least once each week, consisting mainly of fresh chili pepper, dried chili pepper, chili sauce, or chili oil, was associated with at least a 10% reduced risk of death when compared with eating these foods less than once a week (105211).
• Peptic ulcers. It is unclear if oral capsicum is beneficial for peptic ulcers. Details: Population research has found that eating capsicum fruit (chili) an average of 24 times per month is associated with a reduced likelihood of having an ulcer when compared with eating chili an average of 8 times per month. This applies to chili in the form of chili powder, chili sauce, curry powder, and other chili-containing foods (12053). However, clinical research shows that consuming chili peppers 1 gram three times daily for 4 weeks does not improve duodenal ulcer healing when compared to control (40828).
• Peripheral neuropathy. Preliminary clinical research suggests that topical capsaicin might be beneficial for reducing peripheral neuropathy pain. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying patches containing the capsicum constituent capsaicin 8% (Qutenza, NeurogesX Inc.) reduces pain in people with non-diabetic peripheral neuropathy (96452,111516). Up to four patches, applied to different painful areas, are used at one time and are left in place for 30 minutes on the feet, or 60 minutes on other parts of the body such as the legs, torso, hands, arms, head, or neck (96452). After an interval of at least 90 days, treatment can be repeated, with new patches applied for 30-60 minutes (99407). There is an average 27% reduction in pain when compared to baseline, lasting up to 12 weeks (96452). Another similar study reported a decrease of 1 point, on a 10-point pain scale, in the typical daily pain intensity (99407). The validity of these findings is limited by methodological problems, including the lack of control groups. Further research shows that using a single application of up to four capsaicin 8% patches for 30-60 minutes, or taking pregabalin orally, 150-600 mg in 2-3 divided doses daily for 8 weeks, reduces the intensity and area of dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA, pain evoked by light brushing of the skin) in people with non-diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Complete resolution of DMA occurred in 24% of people using the patches, and 12% of those taking pregabalin (99408). The validity of these findings is limited by methodological problems, including a lack of blinding.
• Prurigo nodularis. It is unclear if topical capsaicin is beneficial for prurigo nodularis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a cream containing the active capsicum constituent, capsaicin 0.025% to 0.3%, 4-6 times daily improves burning sensations, erythema, pruritus, and healing of skin lesions over a period of 2 weeks to 33 months when compared to baseline. Symptoms may return after discontinuation of therapy (10650).
• Sinonasal polyposis. It is unclear if intranasal capsaicin is beneficial for sinonasal polyposis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with severe sinonasal polyposis shows that intranasal application of 0.5 mL of a 30 mmol/L capsaicin solution to each nostril for 3 days, followed by 0.5 mL of a 100 mmol/L capsaicin solution for 2 days, can cause significant subjective improvement in symptoms as well as objective improvement in nose/sinus air volume and endoscopy scores; however, capsaicin does not seem to significantly affect eosinophil cationic protein levels (14359).
• Swallowing dysfunction. Preliminary research shows that oral capsaicin might be beneficial for improving swallowing ability. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that elderly patients at risk for aspiration pneumonia due to swallowing dysfunction have improved swallowing reflexes after dissolving a lozenge containing capsaicin 1.5 mcg in the mouth before each meal when compared with using a placebo lozenge (13100). Preliminary clinical research also shows that capsaicin may be beneficial in patients with swallowing dysfunction due to stroke (102278,105192). One study shows that taking 1 mL of nectar containing capsaicin 150 mcM/L with each meal daily for 3 weeks, in addition to thermal tactile stimulation, improves eating and swallowing when compared with using thermal tactile stimulation and placebo nectar (102278). Another study shows that 20 minutes of stimulation with an ice swab containing capsaicin 0.15 mM before lunch and dinner daily for three weeks modestly improves the ability to swallow water when compared with ice stimulation alone. After treatment, approximately 70% of those using the capsaicin ice were able to drink the water without choking, compared with only 33% in those using ice alone (105192). Capsaicin solution has also been administered by nebulizer. A clinical study in patients with swallowing dysfunction secondary to hemorrhagic stroke shows that inhaling capsaicin solution twice daily for one week reduces the incidence of post-swallow residue and pulmonary infection and increases number of coughs in response to capsaicin compared with placebo. However, treatment with nebulized capsaicin does not reduce the number of patients with swallow or cough reflexes compared with control (111518). More evidence is needed to rate capsicum for these uses.

(Read more about CAPSICUM)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Vitamin A deficiency. Some preliminary clinical research shows that consuming one spoonful of carrot jam daily for 10 weeks improves growth velocity when compared with control in children with vitamin A deficiency (25819). Other preliminary research shows that consuming 100 grams of grated carrot daily for 60 days improves vitamin A status when compared with placebo in lactating women at risk for vitamin A deficiency (67861).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Breast cancer. A meta-analysis of observational research has found that consuming a diet highest in carrots is associated with a 21% decreased odds of developing breast cancer when compared with consuming a diet lowest in carrots (101715).
• Colorectal cancer. A large observational study in older Danish adults shows that self-reported high consumption of raw carrot (2-4 carrots weekly or greater than 32 grams daily) is associated with a 17% lower likelihood of colorectal cancer diagnosis, whereas lower carrot consumption is not associated with a decreased risk. The validity of these findings may be limited by selection bias, recall bias, and other confounding factors (106559).
• Fibromyalgia. Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming a mostly raw, pure vegetarian diet that includes two to four 240 mL servings of carrot juice daily for 7 months might improve fibromyalgia symptoms in some people (98057). The effect of carrot alone on fibromyalgia is unknown.
• Prostate cancer. Population research has found that higher intake of carrot is associated with an 18% decrease in the odds of developing prostate cancer. Increasing carrot consumption by 10 grams daily or 1 serving per week is associated with a 4% to 5% decrease in the odds of developing prostate cancer (96307). More evidence is needed to rate carrot for these uses.

(Read more about CARROT)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bladder cancer. Epidemiologic research has found that eating about 1 cup per week of cruciferous vegetables, such as cabbage, Brussels sprouts, cauliflower, broccoli, kale, or collards, is associated with a 30% decreased risk of developing bladder cancer in men and women (14864). Other population research has also found that higher intake of cruciferous vegetables, such as cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, broccoli, and kale, is associated with a 51% reduction in the risk of developing bladder cancer in men. However, higher intake of cauliflower alone does not seem to be associated with a reduced risk of bladder cancer (26184).
• Breast cancer. Population research has found that higher intake of cruciferous vegetables, including broccoli, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, cauliflower, collards, and kale, is associated with a slight increase in the risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women, while higher intake of these vegetables is associated with a slight, but statistically insignificant, decrease in the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women (26188).
• Diabetes. Population research suggests that higher intake of cruciferous vegetables, including broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, and Brussels sprouts, is not associated with a reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes in women (26187).
• Lung cancer. Population research has found that increased dietary intake of cauliflower is associated with a 61% reduction in the risk of lung cancer in women; however, it does not seem to be associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer in men (26185).
• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Population research has found that, for women, consuming at least half a serving of cauliflower or other green vegetables daily is associated with a lower risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly the follicular lymphoma subtype, compared with eating these vegetables less often. However, eating cauliflower and other green vegetables does not appear to be associated with a reduced risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in men (26186).
• Prostate cancer. Population research has found that people who consume higher amounts of cauliflower and other cruciferous vegetables have a lower risk of developing prostate cancer (25420).
• Stroke. Population research has found that higher intake of cauliflower and other cruciferous vegetables is associated with a 32% reduced risk of ischemic stroke (7394). More evidence is needed to rate cauliflower for these uses.

(Read more about CAULIFLOWER)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Anxiety. It is unclear if oral celery seed extract is beneficial in patients with anxiety. Details: A small clinical study in Iranian adults with hypertension on standard antihypertensive therapy shows that taking celery seed extract 1.34 grams daily for 4 weeks reduces symptoms of anxiety and depression when compared with placebo (112409). However, it is unclear if these benefits can be extrapolated to patients in geographic locations other than Iran.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral celery seed extract is beneficial in patients with depression. Details: A small clinical study in Iranian adults with hypertension on standard antihypertensive therapy shows that taking celery seed extract 1.34 grams daily for 4 weeks reduces symptoms of anxiety and depression when compared with placebo (112409). However, it is unclear if these benefits can be extrapolated to patients in geographic locations other than Iran.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral celery seed extract is beneficial in patients with diabetes. Details: A small clinical study in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking celery seed powder 250 mg three times daily for 12 weeks does not improve fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, insulin resistance, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, or blood pressure when compared with placebo (112411). However, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Dysmenorrhea. Oral celery seed has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One clinical trial in female college students shows that taking a specific combination product containing celery seed, saffron, and anise extracts (SCA, Gol Daro Herbal Medicine Laboratory) 500 mg three times daily for 3 days, starting at the beginning of bleeding or pain, reduces severity and duration of pain symptoms associated with menstruation when compared with placebo (17214). It is not clear if these effects are due to celery, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Dyspepsia. Oral celery seed has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical trial in adults with functional dyspepsia conducted in Iran shows that taking celery seed powder 500 mg daily with bishop's weed 500 mg daily spread over three doses after meals for 4 weeks reduces patient-reported dyspepsia symptom severity when compared with domperidone. Taking celery and bishop's weed also reduces patient-reported symptom frequency when compared to baseline (112410). However, it is unclear if these effects are due to celery, bishop's weed, or the combination, or if results can be extrapolated to patients in geographic locations other than Iran. The interpretation of these results is also limited by the lack of a placebo group.
• Gout. Oral celery has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small, open-label clinical study in patients with gout shows that taking a specific combination product (GoutFigher, Max Biocare) containing celery seed extract 600 mg, devil's claw root extract 300 mg, sour cherry extract 200 mg, and other ingredients twice daily for 45 days reduces pain, joint inflammation, and uric acid levels when compared to baseline (106488). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group. Additionally, it is unclear if these findings are due to celery, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Headache. Although there has been interest in using oral celery for headache, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of celery for this purpose.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral celery seed extract is beneficial in patients with hypertension. Details: A small clinical study in Iranian adults with hypertension on standard antihypertensive therapy shows that taking celery seed extract 1.34 grams daily for 4 weeks reduces daytime systolic blood pressure by about 12 mmHg compared to less than 1 mmHg with placebo. Celery seed extract also reduces night-time blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure, but does not impact the heart rate (110755). However, it is unclear if these benefits can be extrapolated to patients in geographic locations other than Iran.
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral celery leaf extract is beneficial in patients with prediabetes. Details: A small clinical study in elderly patients with prediabetes shows that taking celery leaf extract 250 mg three times daily for 12 days reduces postprandial plasma glucose levels, but not insulin levels, when compared to baseline (99572). Although a control group was included in the study, statistical comparisons between treatment and control groups were not reported.
• Mosquito repellent. It is unclear if topical celery seed extract is beneficial for use as a mosquito repellant. Details: One small clinical study shows that applying gel formulations containing celery seed extract 5% to 25% can repel mosquitos in a dose-dependent manner for up to 4.5 hours. These formulations show similar repellant action when compared with DEET-containing formulations and appear to be superior to commercial repellants without DEET (40988). Celery extract has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. Two clinical studies show that application of a specific formulation (G10, E.A.R. Samunpri) containing celery seed extract 5%, along with vanillin, eucalyptus oil, orange oil, and citronella oil, seems to repel mosquitos for up to 4.5 hours comparably to other commercial products, including DEET 25% and Insect Block 28 (41049,41052). It is unclear if these findings are due to celery, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Osteoarthritis. Oral celery seed has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small, open-label clinical study in patients with mild knee osteoarthritis shows that taking a specific combination product (Tregocel, Max Biocare) providing celery seed 1000 mg, Boswellia serrata resin extract 1000 mg, devil's claw 1000 mg, ginger rhizome 330 mg, and curcumin 180 mg daily for 36 weeks reduces pain, improves functional capacity, and increases walking distance when compared to baseline (106078). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group. Additionally, it is unclear if these findings are due to celery, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although there has been interest in using oral celery juice for RA, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of celery for this purpose.
• Sexual dysfunction. It is unclear if oral celery seed powder is beneficial in females with sexual dysfunction. Details: One small clinical study in females with sexual dysfunction shows that taking celery seed powder 500 mg three times daily for 6 weeks improves sexual dysfunction symptom scores, primarily due to patient-rated improvements in sexual desire, arousal, lubrication, and pain, when compared with placebo (106486).
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Although there has been interest in using oral celery juice for UTIs, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of celery for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate celery for these uses.

(Read more about CELERY)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Chromium deficiency. Oral or parenteral chromium is effective for the treatment and prevention of chromium deficiency. Details: Chromium is effective for preventing and treating symptoms of chromium deficiency, including hyperglycemia, glycosuria, sudden weight loss, peripheral neuropathy, and confusion (7135).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Diabetes. Oral chromium seems to be modestly beneficial for improving glycemic control in diabetes, especially when used in doses greater than 200 mcg daily and in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. It is unclear if chromium helps to prevent the development of diabetes. Details: Epidemiological research has found that lower toenail chromium levels are associated with an increased risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease (11908). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed a qualified health claim stating that chromium picolinate may reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes. However, the FDA has determined that any relationship between chromium picolinate and type 2 diabetes is highly uncertain and is based on limited scientific evidence (102362). Research on the use of chromium for the treatment of type 2 diabetes is conflicting but seems to show modest benefit in some patients. Several clinical studies, most including fewer than 80 patients with type 2 diabetes, show that taking chromium decreases fasting blood glucose, postprandial glucose, insulin, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and increases insulin sensitivity (6867,7137,12390,14440,15169,42628,42638,95097,103745). However, other small clinical studies show that chromium is no better than placebo for improving most glycemic indices in patients with diabetes (7060,14325,42679,42707,90059,103746,103749). Some of these studies may not have been adequately powered and some had a high risk of bias. Furthermore, these studies had high heterogeneity related to study population and size, chromium supplementation duration, formulation, and dose, and accepted standards of diabetes care. Multiple meta-analyses pooling results of these small clinical trials also show mixed results (90055,90063,95098,105026,110610,111420). The most recent of the aforementioned meta-analyses show that chromium picolinate lowers HbA1c by about 0.6%, with conflicting findings related to fasting blood glucose and measures of insulin resistance (110610,111420). It is unclear if chromium yeast, chromium dinicocysteinate, or chromium with biotin or other natural ingredients are beneficial. Chromium seems to be most beneficial in doses of greater than 200 mcg taken for 12 weeks or longer, and in patients with poorly controlled diabetes with a baseline HbA1c of 8% or greater (90063,105026). There is also speculation that chromium might primarily benefit patients with low chromium levels; however, there has not been an analysis specifically evaluating this population (6867,7058,13725,14325,95098). Some research suggests that chromium might also modestly improve lipid levels in patients with type 2 diabetes (1934,6867,95098). A meta-analysis of clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking chromium 42-1000 mcg daily for 5-26 weeks decreases triglyceride levels by 7 mg/dL and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 2 mg/dL when compared with control. Taking chromium did not affect low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. However, the validity of these results is limited by high heterogeneity (110605). Another meta-analysis failed to demonstrate any effects of chromium on lipid levels (110610). Research on chromium's effect on blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes is mixed. A meta-analysis of clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking chromium 200-1000 mcg daily for 8-25 weeks lowers diastolic blood pressure by 2 mmHg, but does not improve systolic blood pressure or body mass index, when compared with placebo (110607). Preliminary clinical research shows that chromium picolinate might improve metabolic parameters in patients with other forms of diabetes as well. This includes those with type 1 diabetes (1935), diabetes secondary to corticosteroid use (5039,42829), and gestational diabetes (42817).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Hypertension. Meta-analyses of small clinical trials suggest that oral chromium does not lower blood pressure by a clinically meaningful amount. Details: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in adults with different metabolic disorders shows that taking chromium 42-1000 mcg daily for 12-24 weeks does not lower systolic or diastolic blood pressure when compared with placebo (110609). A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in adults with different chronic disorders shows that taking chromium 42-1000 mcg daily for 4-25 weeks lowers systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 3 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, when compared with placebo. However, the validity of this meta-analysis is limited by high heterogeneity (110604). Another meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials including patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking chromium 200-1000 mcg daily for 8-25 weeks lowers diastolic blood pressure by 2 mmHg, but not systolic blood pressure, when compared with placebo (110607). In addition, the validity of these results is limited by inclusion of patients with and without hypertension at baseline (110604,110607,110609).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (Prediabetes). Oral chromium does not seem to improve glycemic indices in patients with prediabetes. Details: Some clinical research shows that adults with impaired glucose tolerance do not have improved glycemic parameters or insulin sensitivity after taking chromium picolinate 500-1000 mcg daily for up to 6 months when compared with placebo (13053,42670). Likewise, a small clinical study in elderly patients with impaired glucose tolerance shows that chromium supplements do not improve glucose tolerance or triglyceride or cholesterol levels when compared with placebo (13722). Finally, a preliminary clinical study in overweight or obese adults with prediabetes shows that taking two capsules of a combination product containing chromium, cinnamon, and carnosine (Glycabiane, PiLeJe) daily for 4 months decreases fasting plasma glucose by approximately 4 mg/dL when compared with placebo, but does not improve fasting plasma insulin, measures of insulin sensitivity or resistance, or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) (94234). The small effect on fasting plasma glucose is clinically insignificant and may be due to the other ingredients in this product.
• Schizophrenia. Oral chromium does not seem to improve psychological measures in patients with schizophrenia. Details: Clinical research in patients with schizophrenia shows that taking chromium polynicotinate 400 mcg daily for 3 months does not affect weight or mental status when compared with placebo (42613).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Antiretroviral-induced insulin resistance. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial for preventing antiretroviral-induced insulin resistance. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with HIV treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) shows that taking chromium nicotinate 200 mcg or chromium picolinate 1000 mcg daily for 8-16 weeks may help decrease insulin resistance and increase glucose disposal when compared to baseline (42630,42662). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if chromium enhances athletic performance, although some research suggests that it may improve body composition when used in conjunction with exercise. Details: One large clinical study shows taking chromium 400 mcg daily, in conjunction with resistance training, can increase weight loss, body fat loss, and lean body mass when compared with placebo in conjunction with resistance training (6868). However, other, very small clinical studies show that adding chromium picolinate or chromium chloride 177-400 mcg daily to a weight-training program does not improve body composition when compared with weight-training alone (6860,6861,6862,42747). These studies may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference in outcomes.
• Atypical depression. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with atypical depression. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with atypical depression shows that taking chromium picolinate 400 mcg daily for 2 weeks followed by 600 mcg daily for an additional 6 weeks improves response and remission rates when compared with placebo (10309). However, other clinical research shows that taking elemental chromium 400 mcg in the form of chromium picolinate daily for 2 weeks followed by 600 mcg daily for an additional 6 weeks does not improve most symptoms of atypical depression, although appetite and sexual drive may improve, when compared with placebo (42600).
• Beta blocker-induced dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with dyslipidemia due to beta-blocker use. Details: One small clinical study in patients who take beta-blockers shows that taking glucose tolerance factor (GTF)-chromium 600 mcg daily for 2 months increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 16%, but does not affect other lipid parameters, when compared with placebo (5040).
• Binge eating disorder. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with binge eating disorder. Details: One small clinical study in adults with overweight and binge eating disorder shows that taking chromium picolinate 600 or 1000 mcg daily for 6 months does not affect binge eating frequency, body weight, or depressive symptoms when compared with placebo (90057).
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with treatment-resistant, rapid-cycling bipolar disorder shows that taking chromium chloride (Hypo-A Chrom, Hypo-A GmbH) 600-800 mcg daily for up to 2 years can decrease the frequency of affective episodes by approximately three episodes annually when compared to baseline (42618). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Cognitive impairment. It is unclear if oral chromium prevents or treats cognitive impairment. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking chromium picolinate standardized to contain elemental chromium 1000 mcg daily for 12 weeks does not improve memory or depression in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment when compared with placebo. However, results from neuroimaging scans suggest that chromium increases the activity of certain regions of the brain during memory tasks when compared with placebo (42666).
• Hyperlipidemia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral chromium may modestly reduce lipid levels in patients with hyperlipidemia. Details: One small clinical study in patients with atherosclerotic disease shows that taking chromium 250 mcg as chromium chloride daily for 7-16 months decreases triglycerides and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, but not other lipid parameters, when compared with placebo (7060). Other small clinical studies in adults with hyperlipidemia show that taking chromium picolinate 200 mcg daily for 6 weeks, chromium polynicotinate 200 mcg twice daily, or brewer's yeast containing 48 mcg elemental chromium daily for 6-8 weeks decrease total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when compared to baseline (37178,42585,42710). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of comparison with a control group. A meta-analysis of small heterogeneous clinical studies in patients mostly without hyperlipidemia shows that taking chromium does not affect lipid levels when compared with placebo (105029). A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials including patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking chromium 42-1000 mcg daily for 5-26 weeks modestly improves triglyceride and HDL cholesterol levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with control. However, the validity of these results is limited by high heterogeneity and inclusion of patients with and without hyperlipidemia (110605). In addition, some meta-analyses have failed to demonstrate any effects of chromium on lipid levels in adults with diabetes (110610). Limited research has tested high-dose chromium in children. One small clinical study in children with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking chromium polynicotinate 400-600 mcg with glucomannan 1000-1500 mg twice daily for 8 weeks reduces total and LDL cholesterol when compared to baseline (90061). It is unclear if this effect is due to chromium, glucomannan, or the combination.
• Hypoglycemia. It is unclear if oral chromium helps to reverse or prevent hypoglycemia. Details: One very small clinical study in patients with reactive hypoglycemia shows that taking chromium chloride 200 mcg daily for 3 months increases blood glucose levels and improves insulin binding and hypoglycemic symptoms following an oral glucose load (6859). Another small clinical study in patients with symptomatic hypoglycemia shows that taking chromium yeast (Biochrome, Pharma-Nord) 125 mcg daily for 3 months improves symptoms, including chilliness, trembling, and disorientation, when compared with baseline (42711). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with metabolic syndrome. Details: One small clinical study in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that taking a particular chromium picolinate product (Chromax, Nutrition 21) 500 mcg twice daily for 16 weeks does not affect weight, waist circumference, insulin sensitivity, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C), or lipid levels when compared with placebo (42654).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). It is unclear if oral chromium helps to prevent MI. Details: Epidemiological research has found that low toenail chromium concentrations are associated with an increased risk of MI (13728). However, toenail chromium concentrations might not be a reliable predictor of body stores of chromium. There is also no reliable research showing that chromium supplements can prevent MI.
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral chromium slows NAFLD progression. Details: One small clinical study in patients with NAFLD shows that taking chromium picolinate 200 mcg two times daily after meals for 12 weeks does not affect liver enzyme levels or body weight when compared with placebo (105027).
• Obesity. Although some research suggests that oral chromium may increase weight loss, this increase in weight loss is not likely to be considered clinically relevant. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical studies in adults with overweight or obesity show that taking chromium picolinate 200-1000 mcg daily for 12-16 weeks might result in a cumulative weight loss of about 0.5-1 kg when compared with placebo (90062,90065). However, this small reduction in weight is unlikely to be considered clinically significant. Additionally, small clinical studies in healthy adults and children with overweight or obesity show that taking oral chromium 200-1000 mcg daily for 6-24 weeks does not reduce weight when compared with control (6860,13727,17224,42680). Some of these studies may not have been adequately powered to detect a smaller effect. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials among adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking chromium 200-1000 mcg daily for 8-25 weeks does not lower body mass index when compared with placebo. However, the validity of these results is limited by inclusion of patients with and without obesity at baseline (110607).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral chromium improves symptoms of PCOS. Details: One small clinical study in patients with PCOS shows that taking chromium picolinate 1000 mcg daily for 6 months along with diet and exercise counseling decreases body mass index and improves rates of ovulation and regular menstruation when compared with placebo (95094). Also, some clinical research shows that taking chromium picolinate (21st Century HealthCare, Inc. or Nature Made) 200 mcg daily for 8 weeks increases insulin sensitivity when compared with placebo (95095,98687). However, other preliminary clinical research shows that taking chromium picolinate 200 mcg daily for 4 months does not affect insulin sensitivity or improve ovulation rates (42603). Although chromium picolinate at doses of less than 1000 mcg might have very small effects on fasting glucose, these doses do not seem to have clinically beneficial effects on fasting glucose, pregnancy rate, or testosterone levels (95094,95095,98687). A lower dose of chromium has also been studied in combination with carnitine. One small clinical study in adults with overweight and PCOS shows that taking chromium picolinate 200 mcg daily with carnitine 1000 mg daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces fasting blood glucose, insulin resistance, and body weight, and slightly increases insulin sensitivity, when compared with placebo (103747). However, it is unclear if this benefit is clinically significant. Additionally, it is unclear if these effects are due to chromium, carnitine, or the combination. Carnitine has demonstrated clinical benefit when used alone in PCOS.
• Turner syndrome. It is unclear if oral chromium is beneficial in patients with this condition. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking brewer's yeast 30 grams containing chromium 50 mcg daily for 8 weeks might improve abnormalities in glucose and lipid metabolism when compared with baseline in patients with Turner syndrome, a genetic disorder that has a high incidence of diabetes (13729). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. More evidence is needed to rate chromium for these uses.

(Read more about CHROMIUM)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Burns. Although there has been interest in using topical cucumber fruit for burns, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cucumber for this purpose.
• Diabetes. Although there has been interest in using oral cucumber seed for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cucumber for this purpose.
• Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear if oral cucumber seed is beneficial in patients with hyperlipidemia. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with mild hyperlipidemia shows that taking cucumber seed extract 500 mg orally daily for 6 weeks reduces levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 27% and levels of triglycerides by 32%, compared with improvements of only 3% and 11%, respectively, in those taking placebo. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were also improved (103386).
• Hypertension. Although there has been interest in using oral cucumber stems for hypertension, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cucumber for this purpose.
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral cucumber is beneficial in patients with osteoarthritis. Details: Clinical research in patients with moderate osteoarthritis shows that taking a specific cucumber extract (Q-Actin), 10 mg orally twice daily, for 6 months improves the overall measure of pain, stiffness, and function by approximately 70% when compared with baseline. The cucumber extract was about twice as effective as taking a glucosamine hydrochloride 750 mg-chondroitin sulfate 600 mg blend twice daily (103385).
• Wound healing. Although there has been interest in using topical cucumber fruit for wound healing, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cucumber for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate cucumber for these uses.

(Read more about CUCUMBER)

EFFECTIVE

• Folate deficiency. Oral or intravenous folic acid is effective for the prevention or treatment of folate deficiency. Details: Administering folic acid orally or parenterally improves and prevents folate deficiency (505,8739). Clinical research shows that supplementation with folic acid 100 mcg to 5 mg daily during pregnancy decreases the risk of developing megaloblastic anemia by up to 79% (91307).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Kidney failure. Taking folic acid orally reduces homocysteine levels in people with kidney failure who are on hemodialysis. Details: Over 85% of people with kidney failure have hyperhomocysteinemia. Treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia in kidney failure is often more difficult than with normal kidney function (1489,3324,7289,9413,9414,9416). The reasons for this are not fully understood; renal uptake and metabolism of homocysteine may be reduced in severe kidney failure, and hemodialysis may contribute to vitamin deficiencies (6884,9414,9417). Folic acid 0.8-15 mg daily or 3 times weekly is generally used, but the degree of homocysteine reduction varies between 12% to 50%, and normal homocysteine levels (less than 12 µmol/L) cannot always be achieved. Adding vitamin B12 400-1000 mcg daily and vitamin B6 20-50 mg daily produces an additional reduction in homocysteine (1489,6884,7289,7881,9322,9413,9414,9415,9416,9417). Folic acid doses greater than 15 mg daily do not seem to provide additional benefit. Also, doses of 30-60 mg might cause a rebound in homocysteine levels when treatment is stopped (9219). Despite the homocysteine-lowering effect of folic acid in kidney failure, the most robust meta-analysis of 11 clinical trials suggests that folic acid supplementation does not seem to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events (50527). A smaller meta-analysis of 7 clinical trials that used a different primary composite outcome suggests that folic acid might reduce the risk of cardiovascular events by 15% when compared with control (91311). There has also been interest in using a reduced form of folic acid, L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (L-5-MTHF). One study in patients on hemodialysis suggests that taking L-5-MTHF 17 mg daily for 12 weeks might lower homocysteine levels to a greater extent than an equimolar 15 mg of folic acid (104908). Another clinical trial in patients on hemodialysis suggests that giving intravenous L-5-MTHF 50 mg three times weekly is associated with an increased survival of about 36 months, compared with about 26 months with folic acid 5 mg daily. There was no difference in homocysteine reduction between groups (104909). These results should be interpreted with caution because they have not been replicated, and there was no placebo control. Furthermore, survival may have been affected by the availability of kidney transplants.
• Hyperhomocysteinemia. Oral folic acid, taken alone or in combination with other B vitamins, lowers homocysteine levels in most patients. However, it is unclear if this has cardiovascular benefits. Details: Taking folic acid orally 0.4-5 mg daily lowers fasting homocysteine levels by 20% to 30% in people with normal to moderately elevated homocysteine levels at baseline. Folic acid 0.8-1 mg daily seems to provide maximal reduction (9307,9400,9401,9405,9408,11337,11338,50145). Doses above 1 mg daily do not seem to add benefit (9307), except in some people with certain gene mutations that cause homocysteine levels of 20 µmol/L or higher (9408). The higher the initial homocysteine levels, the lower the folic acid dose needed to attain maximum homocysteine reduction (9307). The effects of folic acid supplementation on homocysteine concentrations appear to be greater in females than males (50145). Adding vitamin B6 25-250 mg or vitamin B12 500 mcg seems to further reduce homocysteine levels (1489,9400,9405,9406,9408,107136). Some experts recommend routine use of vitamin B12 in homocysteine-lowering regimens to avoid the risk of neuropathy in people with undetected vitamin B12 deficiency (9405). Increasing folic acid intake with supplements or folate-fortified cereal products is more effective for reducing homocysteine levels than increasing intake of folate-rich foods (6367). Fortification of cereals and flour with 140 mcg folic acid per 100 grams reduces the mean homocysteine level in the general population by about 7% (7881,9404,9407). Elevated homocysteine levels are considered by some to be an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis progression, recurrent thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and other vascular complications (3886,3887,6236,7725,9314,9318,50509). However, elevated homocysteine levels may be a marker, as opposed to a cause, of vascular disease (11387,11388). Although folic acid lowers homocysteine levels, it is not yet known whether this reduces the risk of vascular disease. One meta-analysis shows that taking folic acid can reduce the risk of stroke by about 10% in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD); the reduction is greatest in patients for whom homocysteine levels are lowered by at least 25% (96157). A meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials, including over 44,000 patients at risk for or with a history of CVD, shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo (97619). Also, a meta-analysis in patients with a history of stroke shows that B vitamin supplementation, including folic acid, reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% and the risk of vascular death by 11% when compared with placebo (107136). However other research does not agree. Meta-analyses of clinical research show that folic acid does not prevent CVD or coronary heart disease, in spite of lowering homocysteine by up to 55%, when individuals with normal or high levels of homocysteine are considered (50539,96147,97619). Furthermore, most research shows that folic acid supplementation, alone or in combination with vitamin B6 and vitamin B12, does not improve endothelial function or improve secondary prevention of cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction in people with existing CVD despite a homocysteine-lowering effect (9313,11337,11387,13482,50437,97619). Some research even suggests an increase in CVD risk concurrent with homocysteine lowering (13482). Large randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm or refute these findings. Some researchers hypothesize that different genetic profiles might explain some of these conflicting results. For instance, individuals with a homozygous 677TT MTHFR genotype typically have increased homocysteine levels. However, a meta-analysis suggests that treatment with folic acid does not reduce the risk of ischemic heart disease despite reducing homocysteine levels in individuals with 677TT MTHFR (50456). It has also been theorized that a reduced form of folic acid, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) might work better in these individuals. Although [6RS]-5-MTHF has been shown to lower homocysteine levels (104915), studies assessing its cardiovascular benefits are lacking.
• Methotrexate toxicity. Oral folic acid reduces the severity of methotrexate toxicity. Details: Oral folic acid reduces methotrexate toxicity symptoms, such as nausea and vomiting, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriasis (768,2162,2163,2164,4492,4493,4494,9369,9419). Folic acid also seems to reduce methotrexate-induced hepatic side effects by approximately 36% (50320). Some research shows that a low, 0.8 mg weekly dose of folic acid is equally effective to a higher dose of 5 mg weekly for the prevention of methotrexate toxicity (102388).
• Neural tube birth defects. Oral folic acid helps to prevent neural tube birth defects in newborns. Details: Clinical practice guidelines recommend that anyone capable of becoming pregnant take folic acid 400 mcg daily from fortified foods or supplements to prevent neural tube birth defects in infants. Folic acid 600 mcg daily is advised during pregnancy (94811,96146). This recommendation is based on research showing that a higher intake of folic acid from food and supplements during pregnancy reduces the primary incidence of neural tube birth defects by 41% to 69% (3325,9309,50344,50403,50468,95156). Individuals with a history of children with neural tube birth defects usually take a higher dose of folic acid 4000 mcg daily starting one month before and continuing for up to 3 months after conception (96146). Evidence shows that, when used for secondary prevention, folic acid supplementation reduces the incidence of neural tube defects by 66% to 87% (21235,50263,50344,50403,95156). In the US, foods containing at least 60 mcg of folic acid can be labeled with a health claim stating that healthful diets with adequate folic acid intake may reduce the risk of having a child with a brain or spinal cord defect (102369).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cognitive impairment. Taking folic acid alone, with other B vitamins or with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), might improve thinking and memory skills in older patients with cognitive impairment. Details: One clinical trial in patients aged 65 years and older with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) shows that taking folic acid 400 mcg daily for 2 years increases IQ scores when compared with placebo (100952). Two small, low-quality clinical studies in patients aged 70-90 years with cognitive impairment and low folate levels or folate deficiency shows that taking folic acid 5 or 15 mg daily for up to 63 days improves cognitive function, including measures such as memory and attention, when compared with placebo or baseline (50301,104911). Folic acid also appears to be beneficial when used in combination with other B vitamins or with DHA. A clinical trial in patients aged 70 years and older with MCI shows that taking folic acid 800 mcg, vitamin B6 20 mg, and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily for 2 years mitigates decline in executive function and, in patients with high baseline homocysteine levels, improves cognition and memory when compared with placebo (50480). Taking folic acid 800 mcg with or without DHA 800 mg daily for 6 months modestly improves cognition, as measured on the full-scale intelligence quotient, when compared with placebo (103978,109196). However, this benefit is no longer present at 6 months after treatment discontinuation (109196).
• Depression. Oral folic acid seems to modestly reduce depression severity when added to conventional antidepressant therapy. It is unclear if folic acid can reduce the prevalence of depression or the risk for suicide. Details: Observational studies suggest that depression is correlated with low folate status, particularly in females (50105,50127,50243). Taking folic acid 0.2-15 mg daily for up to 6 months with conventional antidepressants seems to improve treatment response in patients with major depressive disorder (3657,10884,10887,50566,109190). One meta-analysis shows that taking L-methylfolate or folic acid as an adjunct to treatment with conventional antidepressants modestly reduces depression severity when compared with placebo and conventional antidepressants. The response and remission rates were improved by 36% and 39%, respectively (109190). However, limited clinical research suggests that folic acid is not effective as a replacement for conventional antidepressant therapy (10886). Also, a small clinical study in adolescents at high familial risk for mood disorders suggests that taking folic acid 2.5 mg daily for up to 36 months does not prevent mood disorders when compared with placebo. However, in the patients that were eventually diagnosed with depression, the time of onset was delayed from 5 months to 15.5 months in the group using folic acid when compared with placebo (91313). Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that folic acid is not currently recommended as monotherapy treatment for unipolar depression (110318). Observational research has also evaluated the association between folic acid supplementation and suicidal events in patients with or without depression. One within-person cohort study, in which only 12% of patients were diagnosed with depression, has found that filling a folic acid prescription of 0.4-5 mg daily, either alone or as part of a multivitamin, is associated with a reduced risk for suicidal events during the following months when compared with months without a prescription (109201). It is unclear what percentage of these patients, if any, had folate deficiency at baseline.
• Hypertension. Oral folic acid seems to modestly reduce hypertension. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking folic acid 5-10 mg daily for at least 6 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure by 2mmHg and improves flow-mediated dilation by 1.6% in hypertensive individuals (50364). Some research has evaluated folic acid in hypertensive patients when used with antihypertensive drugs. Results show that taking folic acid 400-800 mcg in combination with enalapril 10 mg daily for about 4.5 years does not improve blood pressure when compared with enalapril alone (50302,96158). However, in hypertensive patients with heavy proteinuria, this combination seems to reduce the risk of all-cause mortality by about 41% when compared with enalapril alone (96158).
• Phenytoin-induced gingival hyperplasia. Topical folic acid seems to reduce gingival hyperplasia due to phenytoin. The effect of oral folic acid is unclear. Details: Applying folic acid topically seems to inhibit gingival hyperplasia secondary to phenytoin therapy (2151). However, taking folic acid orally does not seem to improve gingival hyperplasia secondary to phenytoin therapy in adults (2150,2151,2152), although some evidence suggests that taking folic acid 500 mcg daily reduces the risk of phenytoin-induced gingival hyperplasia by 33% in children when compared with placebo (50463).
• Stroke. Although some clinical research has shown that oral folate reduces stroke risk by a small amount, more research is needed to determine who is most likely to benefit. Most individual clinical trials show that folic acid seems to reduce stroke risk only in regions without food-fortification policies. Details: Multiple clinical studies have shown that folic acid supplementation reduces the risk of stroke by 10% to 25% in regions WITHOUT established policies mandating folic acid fortification of grain products (50240,50485,50525,50539,91325,96154,96157,96159,97308). The effect appears to be greatest when folic acid is taken in low doses (usually 0.8 mg daily or lower) (50525,96157,96159), in regions with a low prevalence of statin use (50525,96159), in patients with high cholesterol levels at baseline (96152), in patients who achieve homocysteine reduction of at least 20% (50407,96157), and in patients with the lowest folate levels at baseline (96154,96157). There is also some evidence that the effect of folic acid on stroke risk is greatest in patients with low baseline levels of vitamin B12 (96159). In 2001, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368). Most research shows that folic acid supplementation does not reduce the risk of stroke in regions WITH established policies mandating folic acid fortification (50240,50485,50525,50539,96157,96159,97308). However, there is some evidence that folic acid may reduce the risk of stroke in patients from regions with folic acid fortification who have recently had a stroke or transient ischemic attack and are not using antiplatelet drugs (90379). Meta-analyses of clinical research have been conducted. However, possible confounding due to the presence or absence of folic acid fortification is unclear. A meta-analysis of the available research in adults with existing CVD shows that folic acid supplementation at a daily dose of less than 2 mg reduces the risk for stroke by about 10% (102386). Also, a meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials, including over 44,000 patients at risk for or with a history of CVD, shows that B vitamin supplementation, including folic acid, reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo (97619). In patients with a history of stroke, a meta-analysis shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% and the risk of vascular death by 11% when compared with placebo (107136). It is unclear if folic acid reduces the stroke risk in patients with impaired kidney function. Some research shows that taking folic acid in combination with high doses of vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) does not reduce the risk of stroke in these patients (11387,96150). However, there is concern that the lack of benefit may have been due to the decline in kidney function from high doses of cyanocobalamin (96150). Additional research is needed to determine if folic acid supplementation is beneficial in patients with impaired kidney function when used with other forms of vitamin B12 such as methylcobalamin or hydroxycobalamin.
• Vitiligo. Oral folic acid seems to improve vitiligo symptoms. Details: Taking folic acid orally seems to improve symptoms of vitiligo (2153,2154). This finding is supported by a meta-analysis of observational research which shows that patients with vitiligo have higher serum homocysteine levels when compared with patients without vitiligo (100951).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Anemia. Adding oral folic acid to oral iron therapy does not seem to improve hematologic parameters in patients with anemia. Details: In postpartum patients with anemia, clinical research shows that taking iron as ferrous fumarate 600 mg and folic acid 1 mg daily is no more effective than iron alone for improving hemoglobin status (91319). Also, clinical research in non-pregnant menstruating females shows that taking folic acid 0.4 mg daily or 2.8 mg once weekly for 16 weeks with iron 60 mg daily does not reduce anemia or improve iron status when compared with iron alone (109193). During pregnancy, clinical research shows that folic acid supplementation does not decrease the risk of pre-delivery anemia or low hemoglobin levels (91307).
• Age-related cognitive decline. Oral folic acid does not seem to prevent cognitive decline in healthy elderly adults. Details: Most clinical research shows that taking folic acid, alone or in combination with other B vitamins, does not improve cognitive function, including memory, language, or executive function, in elderly adults with age-related cognitive decline (50318,50412,50510). In fact, a large-scale observational study in the US has found that people over 65 years of age who consume large amounts of folic acid (median of 742 mcg daily) have cognitive decline at a rate twice as fast as those consuming smaller amounts (median of 186 mcg daily) (13068). While most research on folic acid for age-related cognitive decline lacks positive findings, many of the studies are small, short-term (<1 year), underpowered to detect significant differences, and not specific to patients with high homocysteine levels. Population research has found that high homocysteine levels are associated with decreased cognition in older adults, suggesting that using folic acid to lower homocysteine levels might mitigate cognitive decline in these patients (50094). Two long-term clinical trials examining the effects of folic acid in elderly adults with high homocysteine levels show mixed results. A large-scale clinical trial of patients aged 50-70 years from the Netherlands who have high homocysteine levels shows that taking folic acid 800 mcg daily for 3 years increases memory, information processing, and other measures of cognitive function when compared with placebo (15271). However, another large-scale clinical trial of patients aged 65 years and older from the Netherlands who have high homocysteine levels shows that taking folic acid 400 mcg and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily for 2 years lowers homocysteine levels, but does not appear to improve overall measures of cognitive function, when compared with placebo (90392). The reasons for the discrepant findings in these two studies are not clear but might relate to differences in the dose of folic acid, duration of treatment, and age of patients included.
• Cataracts. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce cataract development. Details: Clinical research in females with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or with risk factors for CVD shows that taking folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for an average of 7.3 years does not reduce the risk of developing cataracts. Furthermore, the risk of cataract extraction was increased by 28% in these patients (96149).
• Diarrhea. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of diarrhea, and might even increase the incidence of diarrhea in children. Details: In children aged 6-30 months at risk of malnourishment, clinical research shows that taking a nutritional supplement (Nutriset Ltd) enriched in folic acid 75-150 mcg, with or without vitamin B12 0.9-1.8 mcg, daily for 6 months does not reduce the incidence of diarrhea when compared with placebo. Enrichment with folic acid, with or without vitamin B12, actually seems to increase the likelihood of having more episodes of both persistent diarrhea and diarrhea lasting over 3 days (90391).
• Fall prevention. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of falls. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 400 mcg and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily, for 2 years, does not prevent falls when compared with placebo in elderly individuals also taking vitamin D (96148).
• Fetal and premature infant mortality. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem prevent mortality in premature infants. Details: Clinical research shows that supplementation with folic acid during pregnancy does not decrease the risk of miscarriage, stillbirth, or neonatal death (91307,96156).
• Leukemia. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to reduce the risk for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Details: A meta-analysis of results from two case-control studies has found that increased folate intake during pregnancy is not associated with a reduced risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (50247).
• Male infertility. Oral folic acid does not seem to improve sperm parameters or pregnancy rates in males with infertility. Details: Some small clinical studies show that taking folic acid, alone or with zinc, increases sperm count in males with idiopathic infertility or in males with a grade III varicocele (9334,90194). However, another small study in males with asthenozoospermia shows that taking folic acid 5 mg, selenium 200 mcg, and vitamin E 400 IU daily for 3 months does not improve sperm parameters when compared with placebo (104907). Furthermore, there seems to be no improvement in clinical outcomes. One large, high-quality clinical study in males with idiopathic infertility shows that taking folic acid 5 mg with zinc 30 mg daily for 6 months does not improve sperm morphology, pregnancy rate, or live birth rate when compared with placebo (102085). Folic acid has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A retrospective study in males with or without varicocele-related infertility suggests that taking a specific combination product containing folic acid 0.2 mg, vitamin C, zinc, L-carnitine fumarate, acetyl-L-carnitine, coenzyme Q10, selenium, and vitamin B12 (Proxeed Plus, Sigma-Tau) twice daily for 6 months is associated with improvements in sperm count, sperm concentration, and sperm motility when compared to baseline. Improvement in semen parameters were greatest in subjects with more severe varicoceles (111296). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Osteoporosis. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Details: Clinical research in elderly adults or adults with a history of cerebrovascular disease shows that taking vitamin B12 500 mcg and folic acid 0.4-2 mg, with or without vitamin B6 25 mg, daily for 2-3 years does not seem to reduce the risk for osteoporotic fractures when compared with placebo (90377,90393). A 5-7 year follow-up of this research has also found no benefit (103981).
• Physical performance. Oral folic acid does not seem to improve physical performance in older adults. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 400 mcg and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily for 2 years, does not improve hand strength or improve performance such as walking when compared with placebo in elderly individuals also taking vitamin D (96148).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral folic acid does not seem to prevent pre-eclampsia in pregnant patients. Details: While the effect of low-dose prenatal folic acid is unclear, high-dose folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia. Some population research has found that low-dose folic acid is associated with a 22% reduced odds of pre-eclampsia, while other research has found no association (91308,99370,99372,110447). A large clinical trial evaluating high-dose folic acid in pregnancies at risk for pre-eclampsia shows that taking 4 mg daily, starting at 8-16 weeks of gestation and continuing until delivery, does not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia when compared with placebo (103929). A secondary analysis of this study in twin pregnancies has also found no benefit with high-dose folic acid supplementation (103977).
• Respiratory tract infections. Oral folic acid does not seem to prevent respiratory tract infections. Details: Clinical research in children aged 6-30 months at risk of malnourishment shows that taking a nutritional supplement (Nutriset Ltd) enriched in folic acid 75-150 mcg, with or without vitamin B12 0.9-1.8 mcg, daily for 6 months does not reduce the incidence of lower respiratory infections when compared with a supplement not enriched with folic acid and vitamin B12 (90391).

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Colorectal adenoma. Oral folic acid does not prevent colorectal adenomas. Details: Although some population research and one clinical study has found that high folate intake is associated with reduced colorectal adenoma risk (2142,2143,91303), most clinical research does not support this finding. Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for up to 9.2 years, does not reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma in females at high risk of cardiovascular disease when compared with placebo (90389). Other clinical research suggests that taking folic acid does not reduce the occurrence or recurrence of adenomas or incidence of advanced adenomas (34596,50241,50265,50369,50394,50449,50522). Furthermore, treatment with folic acid for more than 3 years seems to be associated with an increased risk of advanced adenomatous lesions (50378).
• Fragile X syndrome. Oral folic acid does not improve symptoms in children with fragile X syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking folic acid orally does not improve symptoms of fragile X syndrome (2155,2156,2157,2158,2159,2160,50575).
• Preterm labor. Oral folic acid does not seem to reduce the risk of preterm birth. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that supplementation with folic acid 200 mcg to 5 mg during pregnancy does not decrease the risk of preterm birth (91307,96155). An observational study in patients with and without epilepsy found that folic acid supplementation during pregnancy was associated with a lower odds of preterm birth in patients receiving antiseizure medications; however, no link between folic acid and preterm labor was reported in patients without epilepsy or in those with epilepsy not receiving antiseizure medications (110447).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Abdominal wall defects. It is unclear if oral folic acid helps to prevent abdominal wall defects in newborns. Details: Observational research in a population in northern China has found that taking folic acid supplements until the end of the first trimester modestly reduces the risk of abdominal wall defects and the risk of omphalocele, specifically, in the newborn when compared with not taking folic acid. However, this association was not found in a population in southern China (109191). These differing outcomes may be related to the lower dietary folate intakes in northern China.
• Acne. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults and children with inflammatory acne shows that taking 1-4 tablets of a specific product (NicAzel, Elorac Inc.) containing folic acid, vitamin B6, nicotinamide, azelaic acid, zinc, and copper for 8 weeks reduces inflammatory lesions and improves appearance in 88% and 81% of patients, respectively, when compared with baseline (90800).
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large-scale clinical study shows that taking folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily reduces the risk of developing AMD in females over 40 years of age with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or with risk factors for CVD. Those who took this combination for an average of 7.3 years had a 34% reduced risk of developing AMD and a 41% reduced risk of visually significant AMD when compared with placebo (14620). It is unclear if this effect is due to folic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Age-related testosterone deficiency. Folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in males with overweight or obesity, mild erectile dysfunction, and normal to low androgen levels shows that taking a combination product containing folic acid 400 mcg, alpha-lipoic acid, myo-inositol, and apple (Sinopol Forte) increases testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and measures of erectile dysfunction but not follicle-stimulating hormone or sperm parameters when compared to baseline (111674). The validity of these effects is limited by the small sample size and the lack of a comparator group, and it is unclear if these effects are due to folic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of developing this condition. Details: Low levels of folate and high levels of homocysteine have been linked to a greater risk of Alzheimer disease (50094). Also, some observational studies have found that higher intake of folate from the diet and supplements in elderly adults is associated with a reduced risk of developing Alzheimer disease when compared with lower intake (13165,15270). One small clinical trial in patients with Alzheimer disease who are taking cholinesterase inhibitors shows that taking folic acid 1 mg daily for 6 months increases the likelihood of treatment response, classified as global improvement in behavioral and/or functional status with no decline in mental status scores, by 78% to 87% when compared with placebo (50246). Also, preliminary clinical research in patients with probable Alzheimer disease who are not consuming a folate-fortified diet shows that taking vitamin B12 50 mcg daily plus folic acid 1.2 mg daily for 6 months modestly improves some measures of cognitive performance and decreases levels of homocysteine when compared with placebo (107150). However, not all research agrees. Clinical research in patients with probable Alzheimer disease using routine medications shows that taking folic acid 5 mg, vitamin B12 1 mg, and vitamin B6 25 mg daily for 18 months does not have a beneficial effect on cognitive function or the severity of disease when compared with placebo (50319). However, all patients in this study were also consuming a folate-fortified diet.
• Angioplasty. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Some evidence suggests that folic acid 1 mg, vitamin B12 400 mcg, and pyridoxine 10 mg daily can decrease the rate of restenosis in patients treated with balloon angioplasty (8009,9412). However, this combination does not seem to be as effective for reducing restenosis in patients after coronary stenting (8009). An intravenous loading dose of folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 followed by oral administration of folic acid 1.2 mg, vitamin B6 48 mg, and vitamin B12 60 mcg daily after bare metal coronary stenting also does not seem to reduce restenosis and might actually increase restenosis (12150,12151). Due to the lack of evidence of benefit and potential for harm, this combination of vitamins should not be recommended for patients receiving coronary stents (12151).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if oral folic acid during pregnancy reduces the risk of eczema in the child. Details: Observational research has found that consuming both iron and folic acid supplements during pregnancy is associated with a four-fold reduced risk for developing atopic dermatitis in the child. However, use of either iron or folic acid supplementation alone is not associated with an effect on the child's risk for atopic dermatitis (102387).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral folic acid intake during pregnancy reduces the risk of autism spectrum disorder in the child. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that consumption of folic acid of at least 400 mcg daily from both diet and supplements during pregnancy is associated with a 45% reduced risk of autism in the child at 2-15 years of age. Also, supplementation with folic acid during the prenatal to early period of pregnancy is associated with an approximate 43% reduced risk of autism in the child. This association did not differ between countries with or without a folate fortification program (109198). An individual population study has also found that prenatal folic acid supplementation initiated the first day of the last menstrual period before conception is associated with a 39% reduced odds of autism in the child at age 3.3-10.2 years when compared to pregnancies without folic acid supplementation (91324).
• Beta-thalassemia. There is limited evidence on the oral use of folic acid for beta-thalassemia minor. Details: Patients with beta-thalassemia minor may experience decreased muscle strength and increased bone or muscle pain. A small clinical study in children with this condition shows that taking folic acid 1 mg, with or without L-carnitine 50 mg/kg, daily for 3 months reduces bone pain by 64% to 84% and increases the number of stairs climbed by 2- to 5-fold when compared with baseline (90631). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if adding oral folic acid to conventional bipolar therapy further improves symptoms. Details: Some clinical evidence suggests that folic acid does not improve the antidepressant effects of lithium in patients with bipolar disorder (50566). However, other clinical evidence suggests that taking folic acid in combination with valproate during the acute phase of mania improves the effects of valproate (50357).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces breast cancer risk. Details: Some older population research suggests that increased intake or levels of folic acid alone does not affect the risk of breast cancer or breast cancer-related mortality (50218,50224). However, in a specific group of women who also consume high amounts of dietary methionine, cyanocobalamin (vitamin B12), or pyridoxine (vitamin B6), dietary intake of folate is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (9328,50224). Also, more recent population research has found that folic acid plus folate dietary intakes between 153-400 mcg are associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. This risk is further reduced in those who drink relatively large amounts of alcohol (90794). Folate intakes greater than 400 mcg daily do not appear to be protective against breast cancer (90794).
• Cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents cancer. Details: A large cohort study of children born to mothers with epilepsy on antiseizure medications suggests that prenatal folic acid exposure of 1 mg daily or more, at an average of 4.3 mg daily, is associated with a 2.7-fold greater risk of pediatric cancer when compared with children born to mothers with epilepsy but without prenatal exposure to high-dose folic acid. Additionally, this risk is not present in children of mothers without epilepsy taking high-dose folate (112103). It is unclear how maternal epilepsy, antiseizure medications, and folate interact to increase the risk of pediatric cancers. However, in the absence of clear guidelines, mothers with epilepsy should take no more than 4 mg of folic acid daily (112101,112102).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although oral folic acid does not seem to prevent most CVD events, some research suggests that increased dietary folic acid might lower the risk of stroke and CVD-related mortality in patients at high risk for CVD. Details: In 2001, prior to the publication of the highest quality research on this topic, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368). Meta-analyses of available research show that folic acid might lower the risk of stroke in patients with CVD (97619,102386,107136). Some clinical research shows that taking folic acid reduces the risk of CVD by 15% in patients with kidney failure or chronic kidney disease (50444,91311). However, most research shows that folic acid supplementation, alone or in combination with vitamin B6 and vitamin B12, does not improve endothelial function or reduce the risk of death or CVD events in patients with existing hyperhomocysteinemia, coronary heart disease, CVD, kidney disease, or prior stroke, despite having a homocysteine-lowering effect (9313,9322,11337,11387,13482,50437) (50512,50527,96154,96147,97619,102386). Some population research has evaluated adults at high risk for CVD. This research has found that dietary folate intake of at least 382 mcg daily is associated with a modest reduction in CVD-related mortality and possibly all-cause mortality. Consuming folic acid as a component of fortified food in doses of more than 251 mcg daily is associated with a modest reduction in CVD-related mortality. Conversely, folic acid supplementation is associated with a higher risk of CVD and overall mortality, and there is a J-shaped association between folate intake, serum folate levels, and red blood cell folate levels, with both CVD-related and all-cause mortality (109199).
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents cervical cancer. Details: Epidemiological evidence has found that increasing folate intake from dietary and supplement sources, along with thiamine, riboflavin, and vitamin B12, might decrease the risk of precancerous cervical lesions (11074).
• Child development. It is unclear if oral folic acid supplementation during pregnancy improves child development. Details: Clinical research in Northern Ireland shows that taking folic acid 400 mcg daily starting in the 14th week of gestation and continuing until the end of pregnancy improves word reasoning in the child at 7 years of age when compared with placebo. When compared with a historical cohort from Britain, folic acid supplementation was associated with an increase in full scale IQ, verbal IQ, performance IQ, and general language at 7 years of age (102385). At age 11, benefits in word reasoning were no longer significant. However, there were modest benefits in some measures of processing speed when compared with placebo. Verbal comprehension was modestly improved in females, but not males (109192). Observational research in pregnant individuals and their children in Spain has found that taking less than 400 mcg of folic acid daily during pregnancy is associated with lower mental alertness scores in children at ages 7-9 years when compared with folic acid 400-999 mcg daily, while taking folic acid 1000 mcg or more daily during pregnancy was associated with improvements in some measures of working memory in the children. However, no relationship between folic acid dosing and most other measures of cognitive function was identified (110449).
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there is interest in using oral or injectable folic acid for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of folic acid for this condition.
• Chronic kidney disease (CKD). While adding oral folic acid to enalapril might slow CKD progression, adding folic acid to high-dose vitamin B12 does not seem to be beneficial. Details: Clinical research in adults with hypertension and CKD shows that taking enalapril with folic acid 800 mcg for a median of 4.4 years reduces the risk of worsening kidney function by 21% and slows the rate of kidney function decline by 44% when compared with enalapril alone (96153). However, clinical research does not support the use of folic acid in patients with CKD when used in combination with high-dose vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin). Vitamin B12 might increase the risk of negative outcomes (50253,50409,96150). More research is needed to determine the benefits of folic acid when used alone.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents colorectal cancer. Details: Although the majority of population research suggests that taking folic acid orally from dietary and supplemental sources reduces the risk of colorectal cancer (505,2140,2144,2145,2250,6271,9325,9326,50109,50427,50450)(91306,91323,96160,109188,110450), clinical evidence in general is not supportive. Most clinical research and meta-analyses of clinical trials suggest that taking folic acid from dietary or supplemental sources does not reduce the risk of colorectal cancer (2141,34596,50394). The reason for this discrepancy is unclear. Some observational research suggests that an inverse association between folate intake and risk of colorectal cancer was not apparent until at least 12 years after baseline folate intake was determined (109188). A meta-analysis of observational studies suggests that the benefits of folic acid supplementation on colorectal cancer risk might be limited to patients with moderate to high alcohol consumption (110450). Other clinical evidence suggests that the beneficial effect of folic acid may be limited to colon, but not rectal, cancer (21501). Furthermore, the beneficial effect for colon cancer may be limited to only certain subtypes. For instance, females with folate intake of at least 400 mcg daily seem to have a 46% reduction in the risk of p53-overexpressing colon cancer, but not p53-negative tumors, when compared with those who consume less than 200 mcg daily (21300). Also, the source of folic acid may influence its effects. Some observational research suggests that dietary folate, but not folic acid supplementation, reduces the risk of colon cancer (21501).
• Congenital heart disease. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents congenital heart disease. Details: The exact cause of congenital heart disease is unknown but is thought to be a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Population research has found that supplementation with folic acid or folic acid-containing prenatal vitamins during pregnancy is associated with up to a 40% lower risk of congenital heart defects in newborns (99373).
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of dementia. Details: While some preliminary research shows that folic acid might aid in the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer disease (13165,15270,50246,90374), two small clinical trials show that taking folic acid 15-20 mg daily for 10-12 weeks does not seem to improve cognitive function or the severity of dementia in patients with various forms of dementia, including vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, probable Alzheimer disease, or dementia due to other causes (50062,50597).
• Diabetes. Small clinical studies suggest that oral folic acid does not improve glycemic control. Details: Meta-analyses of small clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes show that folic acid does not reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) when compared with placebo (50528,109197). Another small clinical study in patients with diabetes who are stabilized on metformin and/or a sulfonylurea shows that taking folic acid 5 mg daily for 8 weeks does not affect HbA1C when compared with placebo (104917). The validity of this study is limited by its small size and lack of blinding. Conversely, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking folate modestly reduces fasting blood glucose and insulin levels, as well as measures of insulin resistance, when compared with placebo or no intervention (109197). There was no clear relationship between these changes and the dose or duration of folate. However, the studies included in this analysis evaluated multiple patient populations; the effect of folate in patients with diabetes, specifically, is unclear. Beyond glycemic control, some research has assessed the impact of dietary folate intake on cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. An observational study in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes has found that dietary intake of folate in the highest quartile is associated with 68% lower odds of developing cardiovascular disease, defined as a non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina, when compared with folate intake in the lowest quartile (110452). Folic acid has also been evaluated in gestational diabetes. A meta-analysis of 20 studies shows that serum and red blood cell (RBC) folate levels are higher in patients with gestational diabetes than without gestational diabetes. Subgroup analysis suggests that patients with gestational diabetes have higher serum and RBC folate levels in the second trimester than in those without gestational diabetes, while RBC folate levels in patients with gestational diabetes were higher in the first trimester than those without gestational diabetes. Overall, higher serum folate levels are associated with a slight increase in the odds of gestational diabetes when compared with lower serum folate levels (112107).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with diabetic neuropathy shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid (L-methylfolate), vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin), and vitamin B6 (pyridoxal-5'-phosphate), for 24 weeks does not improve neural dysfunction based on vibration perception, but does seem to improve total neuropathy symptoms, when compared with placebo. These symptoms, which include both sensation and pain, decreased by 25% with the B vitamin combination, compared with only 15% in those taking placebo (90375).
• Epilepsy. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces seizure frequency. Details: A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research shows that taking folic acid does not reduce seizure frequency in patients with epilepsy (50124). However, there is some speculation that folate deficiency might be linked to increased seizure frequency. A preliminary clinical study in folate-deficient children with epilepsy shows that taking folic acid 5 mg daily for 3 months reduces seizure frequency when compared to baseline, but not when compared with a control group that is not deficient in folate (99371).
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in males with mild erectile dysfunction, overweight or obesity, and normal to low androgen levels shows that taking a combination product containing folic acid 400 mcg, alpha-lipoic acid, myo-inositol, and apple (Sinopol Forte, Laborest) improves measures of erectile dysfunction when compared to baseline (111674). The validity of these effects is limited by the small sample size and the lack of a comparator group, and it is unclear if these effects are due to folic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Esophageal cancer. Higher dietary folate intake is associated with a lower risk of esophageal cancer. Details: One meta-analysis of observational research has found that higher levels of dietary folate are associated with a 34% lower risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and a 50% lower risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma when compared with low levels of dietary folate (50208). Another meta-analysis of observational research has found that consuming high amounts of folate is associated with a 36% decrease in the odds of esophageal cancer when compared with lower dietary folate intake (100950).
• Fenofibrate (Tricor)-induced hyperhomocysteinemia. Folic acid seems to attenuate increases in homocysteine in people taking fenofibrate. Details: A small open-label clinical trial in patients taking fenofibrate shows that adding folic acid 10 mg every other day might reduce elevated plasma homocysteine levels by up to 59% when compared with taking fenofibrate alone (9321).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces gastric cancer risk. Details: Observational research has found that taking folic acid reduces the risk of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma by 17% and the risk of noncardia gastric cancer by 33%, but does not reduce the risk of gastric cancer overall (50208). Also, a meta-analysis of 13 small clinical studies in patients with gastric precancerous conditions shows that taking folic acid 20-30 mg daily for 3-6 months improves gastric mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia but does not seem to improve symptoms when compared with a control (110448). Whether these findings are associated with a lower risk of gastric cancer is unclear.
• Gout. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk for gout. Details: An observational study has found that increased dietary folate intake is associated with a lower incidence of gout (50454).
• Head and neck cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial for head and neck cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that the highest intake of dietary folate is associated with a 50% reduced risk of head and neck cancer when compared with the lowest intake of folate. Each 100 mcg increase per day seems to reduce the risk by about 4% (96151).
• Hearing loss. It is unclear if oral folic acid prevents hearing loss. Details: Low levels of serum folate seem to be a risk factor for sudden sensorineural hearing loss in adults (21283). Observational research in females has found that serum folate levels in the lowest quintile are associated with a 19% increased risk for hearing loss when compared with levels in the second quintile. Also, folate levels in the highest quintile are associated with a 12% lower risk of hearing loss when compared with the second quintile (109807). A clinical study in older adults from the Netherlands shows that taking folic acid 800 mcg daily for 3 years slows the decline of age-related low-threshold hearing loss when compared with placebo (15163). However, at the time of this study, folate enrichment of foods was not allowed in the Netherlands. As a result, baseline folate levels in this study population were about 50% lower than in the US population. The effect of folic acid supplementation in people with higher baseline folate levels is unclear.
• Infertility. It is unclear if oral 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) in combination with vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 is more beneficial than folic acid alone for increasing pregnancy rate in females undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Details: Retrospective research from Italy suggests that taking 5-MTHF 400 mcg, vitamin B12 5 mcg, and vitamin B6 3 mg daily results in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates of approximately 60% and 49%, respectively, compared with 45% and 35% of those taking folic acid 400 mcg daily. A sub-analysis suggests that beneficial effects on pregnancy rates are limited to individuals aged less than 40 years (109189). The findings from this study are limited by its retrospective design. Also, it is unclear if these findings are generalizable to countries with folate fortification.
• Kidney failure. It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial in patients with kidney failure. Details: Because hemodialysis removes folate from the body, there is concern that folate deficiency may cause complications in patients with kidney failure receiving hemodialysis. Observational research in Taiwanese patients with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis has found that taking folic acid 5 mg daily for an average of 5.8 years is associated with a 31% lower risk of arteriovenous access thrombosis when compared with folic acid 5 mg weekly. However, daily folic acid supplementation was not linked to a lower risk of cardiovascular events, cancer, or mortality when compared with weekly folic acid (110120). Oral folic acid has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small, low-quality clinical study in adults with kidney failure undergoing regular hemodialysis shows that taking oral folic acid 30 mg daily with thiamine 90 mg daily for 96 weeks reduces overall mortality by 67% and improves cognitive scores by 31% when compared with no intervention (107724). It is unclear if these findings are due to folic acid, thiamine, or the combination.
• Lometrexol toxicity. While oral folic acid might reduce lometrexol toxicity, intravenous folic acid does not seem to help. Details: In a phase I trial, intravenous folic acid 5-25 mg administered 1 hour or 3 hours prior to lometrexol 15-30 mg/m2 every 3 weeks does not seem to reduce cumulative lometrexol toxicity (2161). However, in a phase II study, taking oral folic acid 3 mg/m2 daily in addition to lometrexol 10 mg/m2 weekly seems to attenuate cumulative toxicity and improve its tolerability in cancer patients (104948).
• Low birth weight. It is unclear if oral folic acid supplementation during pregnancy reduces the risk of a low birth weight. Details: Clinical research shows that supplementation with folic acid 200 mcg to 5 mg daily during pregnancy increases mean birth weight when compared with placebo (91307). Furthermore, some population research has found that pre- or peri-conception folic acid supplementation, usually 400 mcg daily, is associated with a reduced risk of a child born small-for-gestational age. However post-conception folic acid supplementation is not associated with reduced risk (91304,103983). An observational study in pregnant Chinese patients found that supplementation with folic acid is associated with a 20% lower odds of low birth weight when compared with no supplementation. This association was observed when folic acid was used both before conception and during pregnancy for at least 24 weeks or during pregnancy only for at least 12 weeks. Increased dietary folate intake was not linked to a lower risk of low-birth-weight infants (110446). However, other observational research has found no association between folic acid supplementation during pregnancy and the risk for small-for-gestational age births (110447).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces lung cancer risk. Details: There does not appear to be a relationship between deficiency of folate and lung cancer (9454). However, consuming at least 130.4 mcg of folate per 1000 kcal daily seems to reduce the risk of lung cancer by 40% in former smokers when compared to those with lower dietary folate intake (50065).
• Melanoma. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces melanoma risk. Details: Population research has found that folic acid supplementation of 2-2.5 mg daily in combination with vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 is linked with a 53% reduced risk of melanoma (91312).
• Metabolic syndrome. Although there is interest in using oral folic acid for metabolic syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of folic acid for this condition.
• Nitrate tolerance. It is unclear if oral folic acid helps to prevent the development of tolerance to treatment with nitroglycerin. Details: Some clinical evidence suggests that taking folic acid 1 mg daily for 1 week does not prevent the development of nitroglycerin-induced endothelial dysfunction or tolerance in healthy individuals (50442). However, other research suggests that taking folic acid 10 mg daily for 1 week prevents nitric oxide synthase dysfunction caused by continuous nitroglycerin (9316).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: A cross-sectional analysis suggests that adults with NAFLD have lower levels of serum folate and its major component 5-MTHF when compared with healthy controls. Additionally, adults with NAFLD seem to consume less supplementary and dietary folate when compared with healthy controls. Overall, serum folate levels are negatively associated with the risk of NAFLD, and inadequate folate intake is associated with an increased risk of NAFLD (112104).
• Oral clefts. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of oral clefts in infants. Details: Observational research has found that maternal folic acid supplementation is associated with an up to 49% reduced risk of cleft lip with or without cleft palate (50220,104921). Furthermore, a large clinical trial in pregnancies at-risk for oral cleft suggests that taking a higher dose of folic acid 4 mg from pre-conception until the end of the first trimester results in a similar oral cleft recurrence rate of 2.5%, compared with a 2.9% recurrence with a lower dose of folic acid (400 mcg). Both doses demonstrate a lower incidence of oral clefts when compared with historical rates of 6.3% (91322). Although there is speculation that genetic markers of folate status impact the effect of folic acid on orofacial cleft incidence, the current data do not show a relationship (104921).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of overall mortality. Details: Observational research in US adults has found that dietary intake of folic acid in the highest quintile is associated with a 14% to 23% lower risk of all-cause mortality and a 41% to 47% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality when compared with the lowest quintile of dietary folic acid intake (110451).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces pancreatic cancer risk. Details: Consuming greater than 280 mcg daily of dietary folate is associated with a decreased risk of exocrine pancreatic cancer (9327). A meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies suggests that consuming higher amounts of dietary folate reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer by 51% compared to low levels of dietary folate (50208). However, another meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies suggests that folate/folic acid intake does not significantly affect the overall risk of pancreatic cancer (50499). The contradictory results may be associated with the form of intake or may be related to the gender of the participants. A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that dietary folate, but not folic acid, significantly reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer (50387). Also, one meta-analysis of observational studies has found that high dietary folate decreases the risk of pancreatic cancer in females, but not males (50387).
• Peripheral neuropathy. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows taking a combination of folic acid 400 mcg, vitamin B12 3 mcg, and uridine monophosphate 50 mg daily (Keltican) for 60 days reduces pain associated with peripheral neuropathy. Use of this product reduces pain intensity by approximately 44%, with loss of burning pain in approximately 50% of patients, strong tingling or pricking in approximately 57% of patients, strong pain attacks in 92% of patients, and numbness in 90% of patients when compared with baseline. Radiating pain and the use of concomitant medications are also reduced (90384). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Furthermore, it is unclear if the benefits are due to folic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Pharyngeal cancer. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces pharyngeal cancer risk. Details: Population research has found that intake of folic acid and folate from natural, fortified, and supplemented sources, may protect against oropharyngeal cancer. Intake of at least 258-816 mcg total folate/folic acid reduces the odds by 35% when compared with intakes of less than 344 mcg. Furthermore, folate/folic acid may be more beneficial for oral cancer versus pharyngeal cancer and in heavy alcohol users versus non users or light users (91302).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral folic acid is beneficial for PCOS. Details: One clinical study in overweight or obese patients with PCOS shows that taking folate 1 mg or 5 mg daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces levels of homocysteine, as well as insulin resistance, when compared with placebo. However, only the 5 mg dose modestly reduces insulin, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. Neither dose appears to affect fasting plasma glucose, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglyceride levels when compared with placebo (109200). Other clinical research in patients with PCOS taking metformin shows that taking folate 400 mcg daily for 6 months does not affect glycemic parameters, plasma lipid levels, or hormone levels when compared with placebo (109194). The reasons for discrepancies between studies are unclear but may relate to patient characteristics. One study included only overweight or obese individuals with at least two of the three PCOS criteria, whereas the other study limited enrollment to patients in any weight category but with all three PCOS criteria (109194,109200).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of hypertension during pregnancy. Details: Population research has found that taking folic acid during pregnancy is not associated with a reduced risk of gestational hypertension (91308,99370,99372).
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). Although there is interest in using oral folic acid for RLS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of folic acid for this condition.
• Schizophrenia. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of folic acid 2 mg and vitamin B12 400 mcg daily for 16 weeks improves negative symptoms when compared with placebo in patients with schizophrenia who have persistent symptoms and a specific genetic variant of the folate transporter gene FOLHI. This variant normally results in reduced folate absorption. However, in patients without this genetic variant, folate is not beneficial with respect to negative symptom improvement (90387).
• Sickle cell disease. Oral folic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other B vitamins; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with sickle cell disease shows that taking vitamin B12 4.2-6 mcg, folic acid 700 mcg, and vitamin B6 4.2-6 mg daily might lower homocysteine levels. However, it is unknown if this will reduce the risk of endothelial damage in these patients (9324).
• Suicidal ideation. It is unclear if oral folic acid reduces the risk of suicidal ideation or suicide attempts. Details: One observational study has evaluated the association between folic acid supplementation and suicidal events in patients with various underlying conditions, including 12% with depression, 15% with anxiety, and 46% with pain. This within-person cohort study found that filling a prescription for folic acid 0.4-5 mg daily, either alone or as part of a multivitamin, is associated with a 44% reduced rate of suicidal events during the months after the prescription when compared with the months without the prescription. For the 48% of patients who received folic acid 1 mg daily, each additional month of taking the prescription was associated with a 5% decrease in suicidal events (109201). Prospective clinical research is needed to confirm any benefits of folic acid and to determine whether baseline folate deficiency plays a role in these outcomes. More evidence is needed to rate folic acid for these uses.

(Read more about FOLIC ACID)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Atherosclerosis. When used alone or in combination with other ingredients, oral garlic seems to slow the progression of atherosclerosis. Details: Taking low doses of garlic powder (Kwai, Lichtwer Pharma) 300 mg, administered as a single dose or three times daily for up to 4 years, seems to lessen age-related decreases in aortic elasticity (4797,51595). Additionally, taking a specific time-released garlic powder supplement (Allicor, INAT-Farma) 150 mg twice daily for 24 months seems to reduce the rate of atherosclerosis progression, as measured by carotid intima-media thickness, when compared with placebo in males with early evidence of carotid atherosclerosis (88394). Higher doses of 900 mg daily seem to slow development of atherosclerosis in both aortic and femoral arteries when used over a four-year period in females, but not in males (3315,4798). In patients with evidence of coronary artery calcium and a Framingham risk score of greater than 10%, taking aged garlic extract (Kyolic Reserve, Wakunaga) 1200 mg twice daily for 12 months reduces coronary artery calcium progression by 29% when compared with placebo (102670). A meta-analysis also found that garlic powder tablets and aged garlic extract may reduce coronary artery calcium scores when compared with placebo (110721). Some clinical research has investigated the use of garlic in combination with other ingredients. Taking a specific supplement (Kyolic, Total Heart Health, Formula 108, Wakunaga) containing aged garlic extract 250 mg plus vitamin B12 100 mcg, folic acid 300 mcg, vitamin B6 12.5 mg, and L-arginine 100 mg daily for 12 months significantly reduces coronary artery calcium progression and improves vascular function in patients with a Framingham risk score of 10% to 20% without coronary artery disease (88385). In addition, taking a combination product containing aged garlic extract 1200 mg and coenzyme Q10 120 mg daily for one year significantly improves vascular elasticity endothelial function in firefighters facing high degrees of occupational stress (44225).
• Diabetes. Most clinical research suggests that oral garlic, taken alone or in combination with metformin for at least 12 weeks, modestly reduces fasting blood glucose levels in patients with diabetes. It is unclear if garlic improves postprandial glucose levels or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Details: A meta-analysis of results from seven clinical studies in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking garlic powder 600-1500 mg daily, garlic oil 8.2 mg daily, or aged garlic extract 1000 mg daily reduces fasting blood glucose levels by about 2 mg/dL when compared with control. The greatest benefit is seen for patients with hyperglycemia at baseline, for interventions lasting at least 12 weeks, and for formulations consisting of garlic powder (96004). Specific garlic formulations used in the reviewed studies have included garlic powder 300 mg 2-3 times daily as tablets (Kwai, Lichtwer Pharmaceuticals) or time-released tablets (Allicor, INAT-Farma) for 4-24 weeks, sometimes in combination with metformin or a sulfonylurea (51396,51463,96004). In one study, when used in combination with metformin, garlic reduced fasting blood glucose levels 70% more than when metformin was used alone (51463). The findings from these studies are in contrast with the results from older meta-analyses, which showed that garlic does not improve glycemic indices or lipid levels in patients with diabetes. Reasons for these discrepancies may relate to the fact that the older analyses included lower quality research (6465,6897). There is insufficient reliable information available to determine if garlic significantly improves postprandial glucose levels or HbA1c (96004). A small clinical trial shows that taking aged garlic extract (Kyolic, Wakunaga) 2400 mg daily for 12 months does not reduce left ventricular myocardial mass, a marker of poor cardiac outcomes, in patients with diabetes. However, this study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (102671).
• Endometriosis. Oral garlic seems to improve pain in people with endometriosis. Details: A clinical study in patients with endometriosis shows that taking a tablet containing garlic powder 400 mg, providing allicin 1.1 mg, daily for 3 months along with standard care reduces overall pain scores from baseline by 72%, compared with an increase of 4% from baseline in patients receiving placebo along with standard care (106615).
• Hyperlipidemia. Most research shows that taking oral garlic for at least 8 weeks seems to modestly reduce total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and slightly increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in patients with hyperlipidemia. However, evidence is conflicting on whether garlic reduces triglyceride levels. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical studies in patients with hyperlipidemia show that taking garlic daily for 2-12 months reduces total cholesterol by about 15-25 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by about 6-17 mg/dL, and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by about 1.5 mg/dL when compared with control (88399,114891). Results regarding triglyceride levels are mixed, with one of these analyses showing a reduction of triglyceride levels of about 15 mg/dL and the other showing no reduction (88399,114891). The impact on lipid levels appears to be more pronounced when garlic is taken for more than 8 weeks and in patients with total and LDL cholesterol levels that are at least borderline high before treatment (88399). Another meta-analysis supports prior findings that taking garlic improves HDL, LDL, and apolipoprotein-A levels while having no impact on triglycerides level. The meta-analysis found that while garlic does not appear to reduce cholesterol in the general population, it may reduce total cholesterol when taken by patients with cardiovascular risk factors (110721). Similarly, a meta-analysis of 17-19 clinical studies in healthy adults and patients with a variety of cardio-metabolic conditions, including hyperlipidemia, shows that taking garlic daily for 1-12 months reduces total cholesterol by about 14 mg/dL, LDL cholesterol by about 8 mg/dL, increases HDL by about 2 mg/dL, but does not reduce triglyceride levels when compared with placebo (114890). Another partially conflicting meta-analysis found that garlic powder reduces total cholesterol, LDL, and triglyceride levels, but has no impact on HDL levels (110720). The majority of available research supports these findings, but conflicting results exist (279,731,732,1873,1875,4782,4783,4784,4785,4786)(4787,4788,4789,4792,4793,4794,4795,4807,6457,6897)(51343,15295,15296,51422,51429,51469,51590,88399,107238)(107352,110721). Whether garlic is beneficial for treating hyperlipidemia may also depend on the specific formulation or product taken. Mixed results have been reported for a variety of specific garlic products, including garlic powder tablets (Kwai, Lichtwer Pharma) 600-900 mg daily in two or more divided doses for 6-16 weeks (279,731,4782,4783,4784,4785,4787,4789,4792,4793)(4795,4807), aged garlic extract (Kyolic, Wakunaga) 1000-7200 mg daily in divided doses for 4-6 months (1873,1875,15295), a garlic powder product (Garlex, Bosch Pharmaceuticals) 300 mg twice daily for 12 weeks (51343), aged black garlic extract (ABG+; PharmActive Biotech Products) 250 mg daily for 6 weeks (108607), and others (732,15295). Subgroup analyses from one meta-analysis suggest that products containing aged garlic extract may be more effective for lowering total cholesterol than garlic powder preparations. If garlic powder preparations are used, total cholesterol levels seem to be lowered to a greater degree in patients taking enteric-coated garlic powder tablets. The opposite trend may be true for reducing LDL cholesterol. Garlic powder tablets seem to reduce LDL cholesterol levels while aged garlic extract does not. However, the few studies that did evaluate the effect of aged garlic extract on LDL cholesterol did so in patients with low baseline LDL cholesterol levels. There is limited evidence on the use of raw garlic or garlic oil products for treating hyperlipidemia (88399). A subgroup analysis from another meta-analysis of clinical studies suggests that garlic oil reduces total and LDL cholesterol more effectively than garlic powder (114891). Taking garlic 1200 mg with fish oil 3 grams daily for 4 weeks or garlic oil 500 mg with fish oil 700 mg daily for 60 days also appears to improve lipid parameters in some patients (4789,4790,51669). Garlic alone may be more effective than garlic plus fish oil for improving LDL cholesterol levels, but the combination may be useful in patients with elevated levels of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides (4789).
• Hypertension. Some clinical research suggests that oral garlic seems to modestly reduce blood pressure in hypertensive and normotensive patients. Details: One meta-analysis of clinical studies show that taking garlic can reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure by about 5 mmHg and 3 mmHg, respectively, in patients with or without hypertension (16605,51414,96007). However, another meta-analysis found that taking garlic may not impact systolic or diastolic blood pressure in patients with coronary artery disease when compared with placebo (110721). When only patients with hypertension are considered, taking garlic can decrease systolic blood pressure by about 7-9 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by about 4-6 mmHg. These results are limited by the fact that many of the included studies were of low to moderate quality and short duration (96007,96008,96014). Most clinical research appears to support these findings (278,279,1873,51442,88398). However, conflicting results exist (107238,110721). Some garlic formulations evaluated for hypertension have included a specific garlic powder formulation (Kwai, Lichtwer Pharma) 2400 mg as a single dose or 600 mg daily for 12 weeks and a specific aged garlic extract (Garlic High Potency Everyday Formula 112, Wakunaga/Wagner) 960 mg to 7.2 grams daily in up to three divided doses for up to 6 months (278,279,1873,51442,88398). Other doses used in the available research have included garlic tablets 300-1500 mg in divided doses daily for 24 weeks (88386) and garlic oil 500 mg plus fish oil 600 mg daily for 60 days (51669). Hypotensive effects of garlic have also been examined in population research. A large population study found that eating raw garlic at least twice daily is associated with a reduced likelihood of having prehypertension when compared with eating raw garlic three or fewer times per week. However, any significant relationship was eliminated after adjusting for dietary salt, making conclusions difficult (102677).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Oral garlic seems to reduce the severity of hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD. Details: A meta-analysis including 4 studies with 186 patients with NAFLD found that taking 800-1600 mg of garlic powder daily may reduce aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) and lower the probability of hepatic steatosis by 2.75 times when compared with placebo (110720). Clinical research in patients with NAFLD shows that taking garlic powder reduces the severity of steatosis in 51% to 62% of patients, compared to 16% to 26% of those taking placebo (102681,103470). Doses of garlic included a specific powder (Amin Pharmaceutical Company) 800 mg twice daily for 12 weeks or an enteric-coated powder 400 mg twice daily for 15 weeks (102681,103479). There was also an improvement in most liver enzymes, other than alkaline phosphatase, and the level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when compared with placebo (102681). In addition, population research shows a 7% reduction in odds of developing NAFLD with each 1 gram of raw garlic per 1000 kcal consumed. However, this association was not observed in females (102673). NAFLD is strongly and independently associated with an increased risk for prehypertension and hypertension. A clinical study in adults with NAFLD and stable diet- or antihypertensive-controlled blood pressure shows that taking an enteric-coated tablet containing garlic powder 400 mg (Amin Pharmaceuticals), providing allicin 1.5 mg, twice daily for 15 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure by 8, 3, and 6 mmHg, respectively, when compared with placebo. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein is also reduced by 16% when compared with placebo (106614).
• Periodontitis. Oral aged garlic extract seems to improve some measures of gum health in people with mild to moderate periodontitis. Details: Clinical research in otherwise healthy patients with mild to moderate periodontitis shows that taking a specific aged garlic extract (Kyolic, Wakunaga) orally 1200 mg twice daily for 18 months improves probing pocket depth, but not gingival recession, when compared with placebo (105760). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of an intention to treat analysis.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Gastric cancer. Oral garlic does not seem to prevent gastric cancer. Details: Clinical research evaluating the effects of taking aged garlic extract for 7 years failed to show a reduced risk of developing gastric cancer up to 22 years later (14447,51470,102016), although there was a reduction in mortality associated with gastric cancer in subjects followed for 12-22 years (5-15 years after stopping the garlic extract) (102016). Also, a prospective, case-control study of 123,484 adults over a 30-year review period suggests that garlic intake, whether obtained from the diet or via supplementation, is not associated with a reduction in the rate of gastric cancer occurrence (97034). However, some research disagrees. One prospective population study suggests that a 1 kg/year increased increment in garlic intake is associated with a 17% reduced risk in gastric cancer incidence over 22 years. Also, consuming at least 3.25 kg yearly is associated with at least a 12% reduced risk when compared with consuming less than 2 kg each year. A sub-analysis suggests that this potential benefit is associated with garlic stalks, rather than garlic bulbs (111764). Meta-analyses of population research, as well as small population studies, have suggested 23% to 51% lower odds of developing gastric cancer with increased dietary garlic intake when compared with never eating garlic (3320,4775,4776,51209,51460,96005,108604). However, these studies have limited external validity.
• Helicobacter pylori. Oral garlic does not seem to be beneficial for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Details: Despite some promising initial laboratory research suggesting activity against Helicobacter pylori, garlic cloves, powder, or oil does not seem to have any beneficial effect when used to treat patients infected with Helicobacter pylori (3322,4761,4762,4763,4765,4774,97034).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for allergic rhinitis (hay fever), there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Alopecia areata. Topical garlic may increase hair growth by a small amount. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with alopecia areata shows that applying garlic 5% gel four times daily for 3 months, in addition to topical corticosteroid use, increases hair growth by 18% when compared with placebo plus topical corticosteroid (51386).
• Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for athletic performance. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of garlic 900 mg prior to exercise increases endurance when compared with placebo in young athletes (51623). A small preliminary clinical trial shows that taking garlic extract 1000 mg daily for 4 weeks does not reduce the time to cycle 40 km when compared to placebo (111765).
• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for BPH. Details: In patients with BPH, preliminary clinical research shows that taking aqueous garlic extract 1 mg/kg daily for one month decreases prostate mass and urinary frequency and improves symptom scores and urinary flow rates when compared to baseline (10374). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Bladder cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for bladder cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral garlic prevents breast cancer. Details: The relationship between garlic intake and risk of breast cancer is unclear. Overall, population research suggests that taking garlic does not seem to decrease the risk of breast cancer. However, when garlic and onions are examined together, there is some evidence of an association with a decreased risk of breast cancer (4779,102674). More research is needed.
• Bronchitis. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for bronchitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for reducing CVD risk factors in adults with hypercholesterolemia. Details: A clinical crossover study in adults with moderate hypercholesterolemia shows that taking a specific product (ABG+; PharmActive Biotech Products) containing aged black garlic extract 250 mg, standardized to provide S-allyl-L-cysteine 1.25 mg, daily for 6 weeks does not improve blood pressure, glucose or cholesterol levels, or anthropometric measures when compared with placebo. A subgroup analysis in males with elevated diastolic blood pressure at baseline shows that taking this product reduces diastolic blood pressure by 5-mmHg when compared with placebo (108607). It is unclear if garlic is beneficial in patients with existing CVD.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral garlic prevents colorectal cancer. Details: Several individual population studies have found that higher dietary intake of garlic is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer (3320,4770,4771,4772). However, results from meta-analyses of population research are mixed (96003,102669). Reasons for the discrepancy seem to relate to the type of population study conducted. A meta-analysis of case-control studies supports a preventative effect of garlic. However, this is not supported when cohort studies are analyzed separately (102669). Case-control studies are prone to recall and selection bias, and some do not account for confounding factors associated with colorectal cancer (96003). Two separate meta-analyses of observational research conducted in various countries have found that consumption of garlic and other allium-containing vegetables (onions, leeks, chives and scallions) is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer; however, subgroup analyses suggest improvement is greatest in studies conducted in Asian countries, modest in those conducted in North America, and absent in those conducted in Europe (108604,108605). The reasons for these differing findings are unclear but may be related to regional differences in dietary habits, such as the use of raw or cooked garlic. Few studies have examined the effects of garlic supplements. While a single preliminary clinical study in patients with confirmed colorectal adenomas shows that taking high-dose aged garlic extract 2.4 mL daily for 12 months reduces the risk of developing new adenomas by 29% when compared with a lower dose of 0.16 mL daily (51320), other studies do not support the use of garlic supplements for this purpose (4773,96003).
• Common cold. Oral garlic might reduce the frequency of the common cold when used prophylactically. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking one capsule of garlic daily for 12 weeks during the winter months reduces the number of self-reported colds by approximately 63% when compared with placebo. The duration of symptoms was also reduced by approximately one day (10787). Also, a small clinical trial in older patients living in residential care shows that 12% of those taking one capsule daily of a combination of garlic and onion powder (Aliocare, Domca Sau, Spain) for 36 weeks had one or more common cold episodes compared with 45% of those taking placebo. Each capsule provided 14 mg garlic powder (111768).
• Corns. It is unclear if topical garlic is beneficial for corns. Details: Preliminary clinical research in a small number of patients with corns shows that applying a lipid soluble garlic extract topically to corns on the feet twice daily for 10-20 days results in improvement in most patients when compared with baseline (15030). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for CHD. Details: A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research in adults with CHD shows that taking garlic orally 800-2000 mg daily for 2-48 weeks reduces total cholesterol levels by an average of 16 mg/dL when compared with placebo. Taking garlic did not affect other cholesterol levels; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. The validity of this study is limited by inclusion of patients with and without dyslipidemia at baseline (107238).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for COVID-19. Details: Clinical research in non-critically ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19 shows that taking garlic extract (Gallecina, Samisaz Pharmaceutical Company, Iran) 90 mg every 8 hours for 5 days or until discharge modestly reduces the proportion of patients requiring supplemental oxygen for at least 1 day when compared with placebo. However, there was no overall effect on clinical status, intensive care admission, or discharge prior to day 6. All patients also took remdesivir (111766). A small preliminary clinical study in patients hospitalized with mild to moderate symptoms of COVID-19 shows that taking garlic essential oil orally 50 mg twice daily before breakfast and dinner for 10 days, in addition to standard COVID-19 treatment, reduces the median duration of fever from 5 to 4 days, cough from 7 to 5 days, and weakness from 9 to 7 days when compared with standard treatment alone. The median time to a negative COVID-19 test decreased from 8 to 7 days (109530). The validity of this study is limited by incomplete randomization, the lack of a placebo comparator, and the exclusion of people with severe symptoms.
• Cystic fibrosis. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for cystic fibrosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking garlic oil macerate 625 mg daily for 8 weeks does not improve pulmonary function, symptom scores, or the need for antibiotic therapy when compared with placebo in children with cystic fibrosis and chronic pulmonary infection (51438).
• Dental hypersensitivity. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for dental hypersensitivity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Denture stomatitis. It is unclear if topical garlic as a mouthwash is beneficial for denture stomatitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with oral denture stomatitis shows that using a garlic mouthwash 40 mg/mL three times daily for 4 weeks improves redness when compared to baseline. When compared with nystatin, garlic has a lesser degree of recovery, but better patient satisfaction (51466).
• Diabetic retinopathy. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for diabetic retinopathy. Details: Preliminary research in patients with diabetic retinopathy and macular edema, treated with intravitreal bevacizumab and laser photocoagulation, shows that taking garlic powder 1 gram orally daily for 4 weeks improves the best-corrected visual acuity by 0.18 logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), compared with 0.06 for placebo. It also decreases intraocular pressure by 1 mmHg, compared with 0.3 mmHg for placebo (109529).
• Diarrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for various types of diarrhea, including travelers' diarrhea and dysentery, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for these conditions.
• Dysmenorrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for dysmenorrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for erectile dysfunction. Details: A small clinical study in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) and poor response to tadalafil shows that adding fresh pressed garlic 5 grams in juice 150 mL twice daily for 4 weeks to a regimen of tadalafil 5 mg daily improves erectile function when compared with placebo plus tadalafil A subgroup analysis suggests that effects are clinically significant in patients with moderate ED but not severe ED (114892).
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if oral garlic prevents esophageal cancer. Details: Observational research regarding the use of garlic in preventing esophageal cancer is conflicting. Some evidence suggests that raw garlic consumption does not prevent the development of esophageal cancer (51508). However, other population research suggests that weekly garlic consumption decreases the risk of developing esophageal cancer (51209).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking allicin, a constituent of garlic, 80 mg daily for 14 days can reduce subjective assessments of exercise-induced muscle soreness in athletes when compared with placebo (51404).
• Fatigue. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for fatigue, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Familial hypercholesterolemia. Oral garlic does not seem to improve blood lipid levels in children with familial hypercholesterolemia. Details: In children with familial hypercholesterolemia, a small clinical trial shows that taking garlic powdered extract, standardized based on alliin content, does not improve levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein (a), apolipoprotein B-100, homocysteine, fibrinogen, or blood pressure (4796).
• Fibrocystic breast disease. Oral garlic has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific combination product (Karinat, INAT-Farma), containing garlic powder 150 mg, beta-carotene 2.5 mg, alpha-tocopherol 5 mg, and ascorbic acid 30 mg twice daily for 6 months reduces the severity of breast pain, premenstrual syndrome, and menstruation pain, and can cause regression of palpable symptoms of breast fibromatosis (51317). It is unclear if these effects are due to garlic, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Gastritis. Oral garlic has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with gastritis shows that taking a specific combination product (Karinat, INAT-Farma), containing garlic 150 mg, beta-carotene 2.5 mg, alpha-tocopherol 5 mg, and ascorbic acid 30 mg twice daily for 6 months improves digestion, inhibits H. pylori infection, and reduces the risk of precancerous lesion formation when compared with placebo (51308). It is unclear if these effects are due to garlic, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Gout. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for gout, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Hepatitis. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for hepatitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking 3-6 capsules of a product containing garlic oil 50 mg and diphenyl-dimethyl-dicarboxylate 25 mg per capsule daily for 6 weeks improves liver function enzyme levels when compared with placebo in patients with chronic hepatitis (51478). The effects of garlic alone have not been determined.
• Hepatopulmonary syndrome. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for hepatopulmonary syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that garlic oil (Garlic Pearls, Ranbaxy, India) 1-2 grams/m² daily in two divided doses for 9-18 months may improve oxygen levels and remission rates when compared with placebo in patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome (51439).
• Influenza. Oral garlic has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in older patients living in residential care shows that 12% of those taking one capsule daily of a combination of garlic and onion powder (Aliocare, Domca Sau, Spain) for 36 weeks had one or more influenza-like episodes compared with 36% of those taking placebo. Each capsule provided 14 mg garlic powder (111768).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for lead toxicity. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking garlic powder 400 mg three times daily for 4 weeks reduces blood lead concentration when compared with baseline, but not when compared to treatment with D-penicillamine, in patients with mild to moderate lead poisoning (51467).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral garlic prevents lung cancer. Details: Some population research suggests that eating raw garlic is associated with a reduced odds of developing lung cancer. However, other research suggests that eating garlic or taking garlic supplements is not associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer (4778,103482). Reasons for the discrepancy possibly relate to the type of garlic consumed.
• Metabolic syndrome. Meta-analyses of small studies suggest that oral garlic may improve some metabolic parameters in patients with metabolic syndrome and other metabolic disorders. Details: Two meta-analyses of several small clinical studies in adults with metabolic syndrome or metabolic disorders including hyperlipidemia, hypertension, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity, and type 2 diabetes show that taking various forms of garlic improves triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diastolic blood pressure , measures of insulin resistance, and waist circumference when compared with control. However, the meta-analyses reach conflicting conclusions on whether garlic is beneficial for body mass index, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, or systolic blood pressure when compared with control. Garlic forms studied in the meta-analyses include raw garlic 5000-20,000 mg, aged garlic extract 240-6000 mg, garlic powder tablets 188-6000 mg, and garlic derivative ajoene 2.34 mg, taken daily for 4 to 36 weeks (113617,113619).
• Mosquito repellent. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial as a mosquito repellent. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of garlic orally does not seem to effectively repel mosquitos (51322). The effect of long-term garlic administration is unclear.
• Multiple myeloma. It is unclear if oral garlic prevents multiple myeloma. Details: A case-control study comparing a small population of adults with and without multiple myeloma has found that increased intake of garlic in the diet may be associated with a decreased risk of developing multiple myeloma (51476).
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for muscle strength. Details: Population research has found that increased consumption of raw garlic is associated with increased hand grip strength in healthy adults. Females consuming raw garlic 2-3 times per week were 23% less likely to have low handgrip strength, defined as being below the 20th percentile, when compared to those who almost never eat garlic. In males, the odds of having low handgrip strength were 34% lower. Eating any raw garlic, even less than once per week, was associated with an increased likelihood for having high grip strength (102678).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for obesity. Details: Clinical research shows that taking garlic powder (Amin Pharmaceutical Company) 1600 mg daily for 12 weeks does not reduce body weight or body mass index when compared with placebo in overweight or obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), although there is a small effect on waist circumference (102681). One small clinical study evaluating garlic in combination with multiple other ingredients shows that the combination (Prograde Metabolism) modestly improves body weight, fat mass, and waist and hip circumference when compared with placebo. The other ingredients include raspberry ketone, caffeine, capsicum extract, ginger root extract, bitter orange fruit, L-theanine, and black pepper fruit (40802). However, it is unclear if this benefit is due to garlic, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Onychomycosis. Although there has been interest in using topical garlic for onychomycosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Oropharyngeal candidiasis. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for oropharyngeal candidiasis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with oral candidiasis shows that applying a topical garlic paste four times daily for 14 days to affected areas can increase the rate of complete eradication of oral lesions by 23% when compared with clotrimazole solution (51330).
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for osteoarthritis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in overweight and obese females with knee osteoarthritis shows that taking garlic tablets (Nature Made) 500 mg twice daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces pain scores by an additional 15% when compared with placebo (98813).
• Otitis media. Although there has been interest in using topical garlic for otitis media, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Oral garlic seems to improve pain-free walking distance by a small amount in patients with PAD. However, it does not seem to improve blood pressure. Details: In patients with stage II peripheral arterial occlusive disease, a small clinical trial shows that taking garlic (Kwai) 400 mg twice daily for 12 weeks improves pain-free walking distance by about 15 meters. There was no effect on blood pressure or ankle or brachial pressures (4801).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for PCOS. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with PCOS shows that taking garlic orally 800 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by approximately 8% when compared with placebo. Taking garlic did not affect other cholesterol levels; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. Garlic supplementation also modestly reduces body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference in this population. However, there was no change in hip circumference (107238,111763).
• Pre-eclampsia. It is unclear if oral garlic prevents pre-eclampsia during the third trimester. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific garlic extract (Garlet, Cosar Pharmaceutical Company) 800 mg daily during the third trimester of pregnancy does not reduce the risk of developing pre-eclampsia in high-risk patients with first-time pregnancies (9201,51626).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for PMS. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adult students with moderate to severe PMS shows that taking a specific garlic supplement (Allium-S, Dineh Pharmaceutical Company) orally 400 mg daily, standardized to contain 1.1 mg allicin, for 3 menstrual cycles improves PMS symptom scores 1.4 times more than placebo. After taking garlic for 3 cycles, 91% of students improved to mild PMS, compared with only 36% in the placebo group (107239).
• Prostate cancer. Observational research on the relationship between garlic intake and prostate cancer risk is conflicting. It is unclear if garlic supplements are beneficial in patients with prostate cancer. Details: Observational research in Chinese males shows that those who eat garlic 2.14 grams/day (about one clove) seem to have a 50% lower risk of developing prostate cancer (9876). Also, a pooled analysis of epidemiological research suggests that garlic consumption may be associated with a 23% decreased odds of developing prostate cancer (88410). A case-control study has also found that garlic, consumed at least twice weekly, may reduce the risk for prostate cancer when compared with lower consumption (4777). However, other population research suggests that garlic consumption has no effect on prostate cancer risk in Iranian males (51454). One very small clinical study in patients with prostate cancer shows that taking garlic extract 1 mg/kg daily for one month might improve prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, urinary flow, and urinary frequency when compared with baseline (10374). The validity of these findings is limited by the small study size and lack of a comparator group.
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Oral garlic seems to reduce pain by a small amount in patients with RA. Details: Clinical research in females with RA shows that taking dried garlic (Garcin; Goldaru Co.) 500 mg twice daily, providing allicin 5 mg, for 8 weeks reduces pain after activity and improves functional ability by a small amount when compared with placebo. Fatigue and pain were reduced by approximately 13% and tender joint count was reduced by 47% (102680,103481). The long-term effect of garlic supplementation is unclear.
• Scleroderma. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial for scleroderma. Details: Clinical research shows that taking garlic 900 mg daily for 7 days does not have an effect on vasomotor function when compared with placebo in females with scleroderma (51374).
• Stress. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for stress, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Tick repellent. It is unclear if oral garlic is beneficial as a tick repellent. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking garlic 1200 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces the number of tick bites when compared with placebo (3318). However, the effect of garlic when compared with commercially available tick repellents is unknown (8027).
• Tinea capitis. Although there has been interest in using topical garlic for tinea capitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Tinea corporis. It is unclear if topical garlic is beneficial for tinea corporis. Details: Applying a gel containing 0.6% ajoene, a constituent of garlic, twice daily for one week seems to be as effective as terbinafine 1% cream for tinea corporis (4767).
• Tinea cruris. It is unclear if topical garlic is beneficial for tinea cruris. Details: Applying a gel containing 0.6% ajoene, a constituent of garlic, twice daily for one week seems to be as effective as terbinafine 1% cream for tinea cruris (4767).
• Tinea pedis. It is unclear if topical garlic is beneficial for tinea pedis. Details: Applying a gel containing 1% ajoene, a constituent of garlic, twice daily seems to be more effective than 0.6% ajoene gel, and seems to be as effective as 1% terbinafine (Lamisil) for tinea pedis infections. Sixty days after completing one week of treatment, mycological cure occurred in 100% of patients using 1% ajoene, 72% of patients using 0.6% ajoene , and 94% of those using 1% terbinafine (8019). Additional research suggests that 0.4% ajoene gel twice daily has a 7-day cure rate of around 80% (4766).
• Trichomoniasis. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for trichomoniasis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Tuberculosis. Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for tuberculosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Unstable angina. It is unclear if intravenous garlic is beneficial for unstable angina. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with unstable angina shows that giving garlicin, 60 mg by intravenous infusion daily for 10 days improves symptoms by 7% when compared with intravenous nitroglycerin (51244).
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Although there has been interest in using oral garlic for UTIs, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of garlic for this condition.
• Vaginal candidiasis. It is unclear if oral or topical garlic is beneficial for vaginal candidiasis. Details: One small clinical study in asymptomatic patients with culture-positive candida infections shows that taking garlic (Garlicin, Nature's Way) 1050 mg (3 tablets) twice daily for 14 days does not improve vaginal symptoms, candida colony counts, or cases of vaginal candidiasis when compared with placebo (88405). Another small clinical study shows that application of a vaginal cream containing garlic and thyme nightly for 7 nights is as effective as clotrimazole vaginal cream for treating vaginal candidiasis (88387). However, it is unclear if this effect is due to garlic, thyme, or the combination.
• Warts. It is unclear if topical garlic is beneficial for warts. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a specific lipid-soluble garlic extract topically to warts on the hands twice daily results in wart resolution within 1-2 weeks. An aqueous garlic extract applied twice daily also seems to provide modest improvement, but only after 30-40 days of treatment (15030). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Wound healing. It is unclear if topical garlic is beneficial for wound healing. Details: Based on patient and physician evaluations, preliminary clinical research shows that applying an ointment containing fresh garlic in petroleum jelly twice daily for 2 weeks results in 80% of surgical wounds healing at a faster rate than those treated with petroleum jelly. Most patients also indicated that the wound treated with garlic experienced less discomfort (102676). More evidence is needed to rate garlic for these uses.

(Read more about GARLIC)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Dysmenorrhea. In people with dysmenorrhea, taking oral ginger seems to reduce pain. Clinical research shows that ginger might be comparable to ibuprofen or mefenamic acid. In addition, taking ginger seems to be beneficial when used as an adjunct to mefenamic acid 250 mg twice daily. Details: Clinical research in individuals at least 15 years of age shows that ginger can reduce pain from dysmenorrhea. Clinical studies show that taking ginger powder 500-2000 mg daily usually for the first 3-4 days of a menstrual cycle modestly decreases pain severity by an average of 2.3-2.7 points on a 10-point scale when compared to control groups (89889,89899,91139,91892,96255,106077). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking ginger does not reduce pain duration when compared with placebo (106077). Clinical research also shows that ginger might be as effective as some anti-inflammatory agents. Taking a specific ginger extract (Zintoma, Goldaru) 250 mg four times daily for 3 days at the beginning of the menstrual period or until pain relief improves symptoms similarly to ibuprofen or mefenamic acid (17931,96259,106077). Also, taking a ginger extract 200 mg four times daily for 3-4 days at the beginning of pain is equally effective to taking Novafen, a combination of acetaminophen, caffeine, and ibuprofen (99444). Ginger also seems to improve pain when given as an adjunct to anti-inflammatory agents. A small clinical study in young females with dysmenorrhea shows that adding ginger (Vomigone, Dineh Co.) 500 mg daily to mefenamic acid 250 mg twice daily for 5 days further reduces pain when compared with taking mefenamic acid alone (102464).
• Osteoarthritis. Most clinical research shows that taking ginger extract by mouth improves pain in some patients with osteoarthritis. Topical ginger, on the other hand, has not shown benefit for knee osteoarthritis in low quality research. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking ginger extract 500-1000 mg daily for 3-12 weeks can modestly improve pain when compared with placebo in some patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip (96253,103357). However, a meta-analysis of two clinical studies shows that taking ginger extract about 500 mg daily for 6 weeks does not have an effect on function (103357). One small clinical trial in patients with mild osteoarthritis of the knee also shows that taking steamed golden ginger extract 480 mg daily for 12 weeks moderately improves pain and functional scores when compared with placebo (114784). Some clinical research has also compared ginger to conventional drug treatment. In one clinical trial, there was no significant difference between ginger extract 30 mg daily and ibuprofen 400 mg three times daily for one month in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee (17930). However, taking a specific ginger extract (Eurovita Extract 33; EV ext-33) orally 170 mg three times daily for 3 weeks was significantly less effective than ibuprofen 400 mg three times daily for reducing pain (7048). Since ginger is thought to take several weeks for significant benefit, this trial might not have lasted long enough. Ginger has also been compared with diclofenac. When used orally as 1500 mg daily in two divided doses, ginger is less effective than oral diclofenac 100 mg daily in two divided doses, or the combination of ginger and diclofenac, for 12 weeks (89898). Various studies have evaluated formulations containing ginger with other ingredients. These combinations have all been shown to improve osteoarthritis pain, and in some cases, functionality. Studied formulations include ginger (Eurovita Extract 35; EV ext-35) 340 mg with glucosamine (Zinaxin glucosamine, Ferrosan AS) 1000 mg daily for 4 weeks, a ginger extract with an alpinia (Alpinia galanga) extract (Eurovita Extract 77; EV ext-77) 255 mg twice daily for 6 weeks, a ginger extract with curcuminoids, and extracts of devil's claw, Boswellia serrata, and celery (Tregocel) for 36 weeks, or Ayurvedic shunthi-guduchi formulations containing ginger, Indian gooseberry, and Tinospora cordifolia, either with or without Boswellia serrata (7084,18210,89557,106078). However, it's too early to know if the effects of these combination agents are associated with ginger or other ingredients in the formulations. Topical ginger, alone or in combination with other ingredients, has also been studied for knee osteoarthritis. Although a meta-analysis of two randomized clinical trials shows no evidence of benefit of topical ginger for pain and disability when compared with placebo or standard therapy (103357), some benefits have been shown in individual preliminary studies (20340,20341,89897,96668,97537,97542). These trials have used a specific gel containing ginger and plai 4% by weight (Plygersic gel, Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research) 4 grams/day in four divided doses for 6 weeks (89897), an ointment composed of ginger, cinnamon, mastic (Saghez), and sesame oil twice daily for 6 weeks (20340), or one gram of ginger extract 5% (standardized to 11.18% of 6-gingerol) in a nanostructure lipid carrier three times daily for up to 12 weeks to the affected knee (96668,97537). Some studies have used ginger essential oil in a massage oil, alone or with sweet orange essential oil or standard therapy, twice weekly for 3 or 6 weeks (20341,97542).
• Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oral ginger seems to reduce the severity of nausea and vomiting in some people during pregnancy. Ginger seems to be more effective than placebo, comparable to vitamin B6 or dimenhydrinate, and less effective than metoclopramide. Details: Although most clinical studies are small and have methodological limitations, the available research shows that ginger is more effective than placebo, and comparable to vitamin B6 or dimenhydrinate (721,1922,5343,11346,13071,16306,20312,20315,90103,91201,102462). Although ginger is comparable to dimenhydrinate for reducing symptoms of morning sickness, it seems to take about 3 days to reduce vomiting episodes compared to 1 day with dimenhydrinate (16305). In addition, clinical research shows that ginger is less effective than metoclopramide at relieving nausea and vomiting associated with pregnancy (20315). Ginger doses of 500 to 2500 mg daily, divided into two to four daily doses for 3 days to 3 weeks, have been used in clinical research (721,5343,16305,16306,20312,20315,90103,91201). The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) considers ginger capsules 250 mg 4 times daily a first-line nonpharmacological treatment option for pregnancy-induced nausea based on limited evidence. However, there is no evidence that ginger reduces vomiting (111601).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Most clinical research shows that oral ginger does not reduce acute or delayed CINV. The effect of ginger might depend on the dose, the other antiemetics used, or the specific chemotherapy regimen. Details: Most clinical research shows that taking ginger as adjunct to adequate antiemetic therapy does not reduce DELAYED CINV when compared with antiemetic therapy alone (20316,96260,89891,96675,97538,97541,101760,102461,113616). Clinical research from meta-analyses and most individual clinical studies also show that taking ginger 0.5-3.5 grams as an adjunct to standard antiemetic therapy does not reduce the incidence or severity of ACUTE CINV when compared with antiemetic therapy alone (89891,96675,101760,102461,102466,113616). However, conflicting results exist from some individual clinical studies (20316,102466). These individual studies evaluated powdered ginger root or liquid extract of ginger root 0.5-2 grams taken in two to four divided doses daily, starting on either the day of or 3 days before chemotherapy and continuing for 3-5 days after chemotherapy initiation (20316,102466). Also, one small study shows that ginger in doses of 1 gram or less for more than 3 days reduces the likelihood of acute vomiting by 60% (101760). More research is needed to confirm the efficacy of this lower dose. Reasons for the conflicting results are unclear, but several theories have been postulated. One theory is that ginger might help reduce CINV associated with some, but not all, chemotherapy regimens. One preliminary clinical study shows that ginger 500 mg twice daily for 3 days reduces vomiting in patients receiving cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, but not in patients also receiving 5-fluorouracil or docetaxel (96251). However, since there is limited evidence supporting this theory, additional research is needed to confirm. Another theory is that ginger helps when used with certain antiemetic drugs, but not others. For example, ginger seems to help in cases when optimal antiemetic therapy, such as 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, is not available. Small clinical studies show that ginger reduces the severity of acute nausea when compared with prochlorperazine or metoclopramide, both of which are suboptimal antiemetic therapy for CINV (89891). Another small study shows that ginger is comparable to metoclopramide for improving delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea (13244). On the other hand, several studies show that taking ginger 0.5-2 grams daily along with antiemetic therapy that includes aprepitant does NOT improve acute or delayed CINV (20318,89891,96251,96675). In fact, one study found an association between concomitant use of ginger 2 grams daily with aprepitant and worsened severity of delayed nausea. Ginger is hypothesized to decrease the absorption of aprepitant and reduce its effectiveness for delayed nausea (20318,96675). However, this effect has not been replicated, and aprepitant serum levels were not measured to confirm this hypothesis. Finally, many of the studies showing a benefit of ginger for CINV when used as an adjunct to standard antiemetic therapy are considered to be methodologically flawed (20317,96252,96677). For instance, one study using powdered ginger root 1-2 grams daily during the first three days of chemotherapy in children and adults (20317) has been criticized for inaccurately representing data (89891). Other studies of ginger 500 mg twice daily for up to 10 days used questionable methods to measure outcomes and usually did not differentiate between acute and delayed CINV (96252,96677). Ginger essential oil aromatherapy has also been evaluated. One small study shows that using two drops of ginger essential oil on an aromatherapy necklace for 2 minutes daily for 5 days, starting on the first day of chemotherapy, reduces acute nausea, but not vomiting or delayed nausea, when compared with placebo in females with breast cancer taking standard antiemetics including granisetron, dexamethasone, and metoclopramide (96256).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Most research shows that oral ginger in single or multiple doses does not prevent or treat exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: Two small studies in healthy adults show that single doses of ginger supplements do not seem to reduce muscle soreness from exercise. Taking capsules of ground ginger 2 grams, 30 minutes before a 30-minute cycling bout, or 24-48 hours after eccentric exercise, does not reduce muscle pain during exercise or within one hour of ingestion when compared with placebo (17932,17934). Taking multiple doses also does not seem to help. One small study in healthy adults shows that taking capsules with ginger powder 4 grams daily for 5 days before high-intensity eccentric exercise does not reduce muscle soreness over 4 days when compared with placebo (96258). Another small study in healthy adults shows that taking capsules of heated or raw ground ginger 2 grams daily for 8 days prior to eccentric exercise, and continuing supplementation for 3 more days, might modestly reduce muscle soreness 24 hours post-exercise, but not at later time points, when compared with placebo (17933,96258). Ginger has also been tested in combination with other ingredients. One small study in healthy adults shows that taking a specific combination product (ReWin(d), Natural Origins) containing a 4:3 ratio of ginger and annatto powder, 2 grams in divided doses daily for 4 weeks before eccentric exercise and continuing for 3 days after exercise, may modestly reduce muscle pain 48 hours after exercise but not at other time points (105057). This study was funded by the supplement manufacturer.
• Motion sickness. Most research shows that oral ginger does not prevent or treat motion sickness. Details: Most clinical research shows that taking ginger 500-1000 mg up to 4 hours prior to travel does not prevent motion sickness (7624,7625,20330,20331). Some patients report subjective feelings of improvement, but in many studies objective measures did not significantly improve (7400). However, one clinical trial suggests that ginger is more effective than dimenhydrinate at reducing gastrointestinal distress associated with motion sickness (20332). Another clinical study seems to show that taking ginger 1-2 grams as a single dose reduces nausea severity and increases the latency before the onset of nausea caused by simulated motion sickness when compared to baseline (20333). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Some small clinical studies show that giving ginger with tube feeds to hospitalized patients might reduce the duration of serious sequelae from ARDS. Details: A small clinical trial in adults with ARDS shows that administering ginger extract 120 mg in three divided doses daily via nasogastric tubing for 21 days increases the number of ventilator-free days and the amount of feeding tolerated and decreases the number of intensive care unit (ICU) days when compared with placebo. However, it does not seem to improve overall mortality (20343). Also, another small clinical study shows that adding ginger extract 120 mg to tube feeds in three divided doses daily for 8-21 days improves blood oxygen levels by 13% to 20%, as well as the ability of the lungs to expand by 17%, when compared with a coconut oil placebo. The duration of mechanical ventilation and stay in the ICU also improved. However, ginger does not affect other measurements of lung function or physical organ damage in these patients (89886).
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial in allergic rhinitis. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking ginger extract 500 mg daily for 6 weeks is as effective as loratadine 10 mg daily for reducing nasal symptoms of allergic rhinitis (103359).
• Antiretroviral-induced nausea and vomiting. Oral ginger seems to improve nausea and vomiting in patients using antiretroviral agents. Details: A small clinical study in patients with HIV shows that taking ginger 0.5 grams twice daily, 30 minutes prior to each dose of antiretroviral for 14 days, reduces the relative likelihood of nausea and vomiting by about 63% and 79%, respectively, when compared with placebo (89887).
• Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral ginger for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ginger for this condition.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Topical ginger has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical trial in adults and children with eczema shows that applying a combination topical product containing ginger and cannabidiol twice daily for 5 days moderately improves eczema scores, including erythema, dryness, itching, and scaling, when compared to baseline. It is unclear if this effect is due to ginger, other ingredients, or the combination. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group (114783).
• Back pain. Although there has been interest in using oral ginger for back pain, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ginger for this condition.
• Burns. Although there has been interest in using topical ginger for burns, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ginger for this condition.
• Cancer-related anorexia. It is unclear if oral ginger improves appetite in people with cancer-related anorexia. Details: A small clinical study in patients with cancer-related anorexia and cachexia shows that taking a capsule containing ginger 1650 mg daily for 14 days improves nausea, appetite, reflux, dysmotility, and other gastrointestinal symptoms when compared to baseline (102460). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of comparator group.
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Oral ginger has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking two capsules of a specific combination product (AKL1, AKL International Ltd.) containing ginkgo extract, ginger, and Picrorhiza kurroa twice daily for 8 weeks does not improve respiratory symptoms when compared with placebo in patients with COPD (89702). Another moderate-sized clinical study in adults with COPD shows that taking a combination product containing extracts of ginger, alpinia, cardamom, cinnamon, and saffron in honey 3 times daily for 8 weeks improves confidence in leaving home and the ratio of forced exploratory volume per second to forced vital capacity of the lungs (FEV1/FVC) when compared with placebo. However, the combination product does not improve most measures of respiratory function or symptoms such as cough, phlegm, chest tightness, dyspnea, reduced energy levels, sleeping disorders, or activity limitations when compared with placebo (111542). It is unclear if these effects are due to ginger, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Colic. Although there has been interest in using oral ginger for colic, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ginger for this condition.
• Constipation. Although there has been interest in using oral ginger for constipation, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ginger for this condition.
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear whether oral ginger is beneficial for patients with COVID-19. Details: Clinical research in adults hospitalized with asymptomatic COVID-19 infection shows that taking ginger 1.5 grams twice daily orally until hospital discharge reduces length of stay from around 8.5 days to 6 days, when compared with placebo. The strongest effect is seen in males over 60 years of age (110005). The relevance of these results is reduced by a lack of blinding, and the fact that the subjects were initially asymptomatic. Another small study in adults with COVID-19 treated in the community shows that taking ginger 1000 mg three times a day for 7 days does not improve viral clearance, oxygen saturation, or respiratory rate when compared with placebo. Taking ginger also did not reduce the risk of hospitalization (114779). The efficacy of ginger for treating COVID-19 has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. In adults with uncomplicated, moderate COVID-19, taking a combination of ginger, turmeric, ashwagandha, and boswellia (BV-4051, Artovid-20), 1776 mg twice daily orally for 14 days in addition to standard care and starting 48-96 hours after symptom onset, reduces the mean duration of symptoms from about 8 days to 7 days, when compared with placebo (109899). A small open-label study in adults with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 shows that taking ginger 1000 mg and ashwagandha 500 mg twice daily for 15 days, along with conventional therapy, leads to a 13.8-fold and 2.6-fold increase in the relative rate of clinical cure at 7 days and 15 days, respectively, when compared with conventional therapy alone. Taking this combination also appears to reduce time to recovery by around 6 days but does not improve the rate of negative COVID-19 tests, chest imaging findings, viral clearance, serum antibodies, or other measures of disease progression when compared with conventional therapy alone (112094). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of blinding, and the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. Additionally, it is unclear if these effects are due to ginger, ashwagandha, or the combination.
• Diabetes. Some preliminary clinical studies suggest that oral ginger might have a small beneficial effect on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes or gestational diabetes. Details: Meta-analyses of several small clinical trials in adults with type 2 diabetes show that taking ginger 1200-3000 mg daily for 8-13 weeks reduces glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by around 0.6% to 1% and fasting blood glucose by 19-21 mg/dL when compared with placebo (96680,107898). However, a recent meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking ginger 1200-2000 mg daily for 4-12 weeks does not improve HbA1c or fasting blood glucose when compared with placebo (114780). The reasons for these discordant results are not entirely clear, but they are likely related to heterogeneity of the included populations, treatment dose, and duration of follow up. Additionally, a small clinical study in adults with diabetes on hemodialysis for end stage renal disease shows that taking ginger powder 2000 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose and measures of insulin resistance, but not serum insulin levels, when compared with placebo (111543). In patients with gestational diabetes at weeks 24-28 of pregnancy, clinical research shows that taking ginger 1500 mg daily in three divided doses for 6 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose, insulin levels, and measures of insulin resistance by a small amount when compared with placebo, with no effect on postprandial glucose levels (103358).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Topical ginger has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in adults treated with gabapentin for diabetic neuropathy of the foot shows that applying a combination balm containing ginger, menthol, camphor, and other ingredients three times a day for 4 weeks moderately improves pain scores when compared with a placebo balm without ginger but containing menthol, camphor, and other ingredients.(114781). It is unclear if this effect is due to ginger, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Diarrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral ginger for various types of diarrhea, including cholera and acute bacterial dysentery, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ginger for these conditions.
• Dry mouth. It is unclear if rinsing the mouth with ginger extract is beneficial for dry mouth. Details: In patients with dry mouth related to type 2 diabetes, clinical research shows that use of a ginger extract 25% mouthwash 20 mL three times daily for 14 days modestly reduces symptoms of dry mouth when compared with rinsing with a saline control mouthwash (106068). Although this study was indicated as being triple-blind, it is unclear how the taste of ginger was masked.
• Dyspepsia. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for dyspepsia. Details: In patients with dyspepsia, a small clinical trial shows that a single dose of ginger root powder 1.2 grams, taken 1 hour prior to eating, does not reduce abdominal discomfort when compared with placebo. However, it increases the rate of gastric emptying (20325).
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for erectile dysfunction. Details: Preliminary clinical research in middle-aged males with ED shows that taking two capsules of a specific combination product (Revactin, MD Concepts LLC) containing ginger root 250 mg, muira puama 250 mg, guarana 250 mg, and L-citrulline 800 mg twice daily for 3 months improves scores related to erectile function and intercourse satisfaction, but does not improve sexual desire or orgasmic function scores, when compared to baseline (103224). This study is limited by the lack of a placebo control, the use of per-protocol analysis, and a high dropout rate. In fact, 44% of patients withdrew in order to resume use of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors. Further, it is unclear if these effects are due to ginger, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Gastroenteritis-associated nausea and vomiting. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for children with gastroenteritis-associated vomiting. Details: In children aged 1-10 years with acute gastroenteritis-associated vomiting, clinical research shows that taking a single dose of ginger reduces the risk of vomiting at least once in the subsequent 8 hours by 20% when compared with placebo. The incidence of vomiting over the next 24 and 48 hours was also modestly reduced. The children were given 20 drops of ginger equivalent to 10 mg immediately, followed by every 8 hours until cessation of vomiting. All children were offered hypotonic oral rehydration solution (ORS) 30 minutes after the first dose (106076). The number of children accepting ORS, and the quantity of ORS consumed, was less in the group receiving placebo. It is unclear if this affected the outcomes of this study. Also, the incidence or severity of nausea was not investigated.
• Hangover. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for managing symptoms of hangover. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that use of a decoction containing a combination of ginger 6 grams, pith of Citrus tangerine 3 grams, and brown sugar decreases symptoms of alcohol hangovers, including nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, when compared with placebo. The decoction was taken once 5 hours prior to drinking alcohol or four times after drinking alcohol (20320).
• Hyperlipidemia. Oral ginger may be modestly beneficial for some patients with hyperlipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research in adults with and without hyperlipidemia shows that taking ginger 200-3000 mg orally daily for 2-24 weeks reduces triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 12 mg/dL and 5 mg/dL, respectively, and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 1 mg/dL when compared with placebo (109521). However, the validity of this study is limited by high heterogeneity. A clinical study in adults with hyperlipidemia shows that taking ginger powder 1 gram three times daily for 45 days reduces triglyceride and cholesterol levels by an additional 36% and 90%, respectively, when compared with placebo (20327).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for lowering blood pressure. Details: A preliminary clinical study in patients with diabetes and elevated systolic blood pressure shows that drinking black tea containing ginger 3 grams three times daily for 8 weeks does not reduce blood pressure by a clinically significant amount when compared with plain black tea (96669).
• Hypothyroidism. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial in patients with hypothyroidism. Details: A small clinical study in patients with primary hypothyroidism who are stabilized on thyroid hormone therapy shows that taking ginger powder 500 mg twice daily for 30 days improves symptoms associated with hypothyroidism, including cold intolerance, constipation, dizziness, dry skin, weight gain, and concentration and memory issues, when compared with placebo. However, ginger supplementation does not seem to improve hair loss, hearing, nail fragility, speech, or feelings of depression in these patients (107903).
• Insect bite. It is unclear if topical ginger is beneficial for reducing the size of insect bites. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that a topical application of Trikatu, which contains ginger, long pepper, and black pepper extracts with 0.074% piperine and 0.046% gingerol, does not reduce the papule size associated with mosquito bites when compared with a control compound containing the same base ingredients of camphor 2%, menthol 2%, and eucalyptus oil 4% (89893).
• Intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV). It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for preventing IONV. Details: Clinical research in individuals undergoing elective C-section and receiving cimetidine and metoclopramide, shows that taking ginger 1 gram orally 30 minutes prior to anesthesia reduces the number of episodes of intraoperative nausea, but not vomiting, when compared with placebo (89890). In other clinical research in adults undergoing elective surgical procedures, adding ginger to a high calorie drink consumed pre-operatively reduces the incidence of nausea from 40% to 10%, and the incidence of vomiting from 25% to 10% when compared with the high calorie drink alone (110007). The validity of these results is unclear as only patients were blinded to the treatment group.
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Oral ginger might reduce symptoms of IBS when used in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking ginger 1-2 grams daily for 28 days does not improve symptoms or the number of responders when compared with placebo (90102). However, some research shows that ginger might be beneficial in some patients when used along with other herbal ingredients. Taking a capsule containing ginger, boswellia, and yarrow three times daily for 30 days reduces the frequency and severity of abdominal pain, as well as the severity of bloating, when compared with placebo in females, but not males, with mild to moderate IBS (96673). Another clinical study shows that taking an herbal mixture containing ginger, English horsemint, and purple nut sedge tuber three times daily for 8 weeks improves IBS symptoms including abdominal pain, stool frequency, stool consistency, incomplete evacuation, and urgency, when compared to baseline; these improvements are similar to those achieved by taking mebeverine 135 mg three times daily (89900). However, it is unclear if these effects are due to ginger, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Joint pain. Oral ginger has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a specific combination product (Instaflex Joint Support, Direct Digital) containing glucosamine sulfate 1500 mg, methylsufonlylmethane 500 mg, white willow bark extract 250 mg, ginger root concentrate 50 mg, Boswellia extract 125 mg, turmeric root extract 50 mg, cayenne 40 m H.U. 50 mg, and hyaluronic acid 4 mg in three divided doses daily for 8 weeks reduces joint pain severity by 37% compared to only 16% with placebo. However, it does not improve joint stiffness or function when compared with placebo (89560). It is unclear if these effects are due to ginger, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Menorrhagia. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for menorrhagia. Details: Preliminary clinical research in healthy adults experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding shows that taking ginger 250 mg three times daily for 4 days, starting the day prior to menstruation, and repeating for three menstrual cycles, reduces the amount of menstrual bleeding when compared with placebo (96672).
• Menopausal symptoms. Although there has been interest in using oral ginger for menopausal symptoms such as insomnia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ginger for this purpose.
• Migraine headache. Small clinical studies suggest that oral ginger may modestly reduce migraine pain severity and duration. However, taking ginger doesn't seem to PREVENT migraines. Details: Ginger does not seem to be effective for the prevention of migraines. Clinical research in patients with episodic migraine shows that taking ginger extract 200 mg three times daily for 3 months does not reduce the number of migraine attacks, the use of analgesics, or the number of days with pain, any more than taking placebo (101761). However, ginger may be beneficial for the treatment of migraine. Clinical research shows that taking ginger extract 400 mg orally in the emergency room along with intravenous ketoprofen 100 mg reduces pain over the next 2 hours when compared with ketoprofen and placebo. This combination also resulted in an overall better response with a higher likelihood of having no or mild pain with treatment (101762). Taking ginger 250 mg at the onset of a common migraine headache seems to be as effective as taking sumatriptan 50 mg for reducing headache severity within two hours of treatment (89894). Furthermore, a combination of ginger and feverfew (GelStat Migraine, GelStat Corporation; LipiGesic M, PuraMed BioScience), administered sublingually at the onset of a migraine attack, decreases the duration and intensity of migraine pain when compared with placebo (19357,22602). It is unclear if these effects are due to ginger, feverfew, or the combination. Feverfew alone has demonstrated some benefit in treating migraines.
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for MS. Details: A small clinical study in adults with MS shows that taking ginger 500 mg three times daily for 12 weeks reduces disability scores and improves physical and psychological quality of life scores when compared with placebo (111541). Another small clinical study in adults with relapsing-remitting MS shows that taking ginger 500 mg three times daily for 12 weeks reduces the frequency and severity of nausea and constipation and the severity but not frequency of bloating when compared with placebo. However, no improvement was noted in other gastrointestinal symptoms of MS including abdominal pain, anorexia, diarrhea, dysphagia, gas, or heartburn (113614).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with NAFLD shows that taking ginger 1000 mg twice daily for 12 weeks improves liver steatosis scores but not liver fibrosis scores when compared with placebo. Ginger also modestly improves levels of alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transferase but not aspartate aminotransferase (113615). However, it is unclear whether any improvements are clinically significant. Another small clinical study in patients with NAFLD shows that taking ginger root 1500 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and fasting blood glucose levels, but does not affect triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, insulin resistance, blood pressure, or fatty liver index, when compared with placebo (102465).
• Obesity. Oral ginger has primarily been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Although some individual research disagrees (40802), a meta-analysis and most individual clinical trials show that taking ginger alone or with other ingredients does not reduce weight by a clinically significant amount when compared with placebo in overweight or obese individuals (20346,20347,96676,109521). Ginger has been taken alone or in combination with green tea and capsaicin; rhubarb, astragalus, red sage, turmeric, and gallic acid (Number Ten); or raspberry ketone (Razberi K, Integrity Nutraceuticals), caffeine, capsicum extract (Capsimax, OmniActive Health Technologies), bitter orange fruit (Advantra Z, Nutratech Inc), L-theanine, and black pepper fruit extract (Biperine, Sabinsa Corporation) (Prograde Metabolism) (20346,20347,40802,96676). Due to the various other ingredients contained in available formulations, any effect from ginger is unclear.
• Parturition. It is unclear if bathing in a ginger bath is beneficial for shortening the duration of labor. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that bathing in 228 liters of water containing 4 drops of ginger essential oil does not shorten the duration of labor when compared with a regular bath (20345).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for females with PCOS. Details: Preliminary clinical research in females with PCOS shows that taking ginger 500 mg three times daily orally for 8 weeks decreases body weight, body mass index, and levels of follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone, when compared with placebo. It does not affect testosterone levels (110006).
• Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Evidence for the use of oral ginger for preventing PONV is inconclusive and conflicting. Reasons for the conflicting findings may relate to the ginger formulation used and the outcomes measured. It is unclear if ginger aromatherapy is beneficial for PONV. Details: Some individual clinical studies, as well as a large, recent meta-analysis of the available clinical research, show that taking ginger by mouth 1 hour prior to surgery does not reduce the incidence of 24-hour PONV (3452,3453,17369,99445). Also, the meta-analysis found that, although ginger reduces the severity of PONV when measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS), it does not reduce the severity of PONV when measured on a verbal descriptive scale (VDS). Furthermore, ginger does not reduce the use of rescue antiemetic medications (99445). However, some small, individual clinical studies and a meta-analysis of older clinical research show that taking ginger by mouth prior to surgery reduces the incidence of 24-hour PONV by up to 16% to 38% (722,723,1919,13237,20336,20338,20339). In addition, large clinical trials show that the frequency and severity of PONV 2-6 hours after surgery are similar when ginger 1 gram is given orally or when medications such as metoclopramide or dexmedetomidine are given intravenously prior to undergoing anesthesia (103356,103360). However, taking ginger prior to general anesthesia, in combination with other antiemetics like dexamethasone or cimetidine and metoclopramide, does not seem to reduce nausea and vomiting when compared with the other medications alone (20337,89890). In contrast, other research shows that powdered ginger 1-2 grams 30-60 minutes before induction of anesthesia has been used in most studies showing benefit, occasionally followed by 1 gram of ginger administered two hours after surgery (722,723,13237,20336,20338,103356,103360). Ginger aromatherapy has also been evaluated for the prevention of PONV. Application of 5% ginger essential oil to the wrists of patients prior to the induction of general anesthesia seems to prevent PONV in approximately 80% of treated patients (20334). Also, use of ginger essential oil aromatherapy on a gauze pad results in nausea relief in approximately 67% of patients compared with 40% in the placebo group; however, a blend of essential oils including ginger, spearmint, peppermint, and cardamom, results in nausea relief in 82% of patients (89888).These conflicting findings may be due to differences in outcome measures and the chemical compositions of ginger preparations used in the various clinical studies. Some evidence suggests that the efficacy of ginger for preventing PONV differs based on the formulation used. A network meta-analysis of 18 studies evaluating various ginger preparations, including ginger oil, ginger powder, ginger extract, and a combination of ginger powder and antiemetics, for the prevention of PONV suggests that ginger powder and ginger oil are the most effective formulations for preventing nausea and vomiting, respectively. The analysis also shows that while no ginger formulation is superior to another for the prevention of nausea, ginger powder and ginger oil have a lower risk of postoperative vomiting when compared with ginger extract. A subgroup analysis suggests that ginger seems to be most effective in adults over 30 years of age, when administered preoperatively, and when used for gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, obstetric, or ophthalmic surgeries (112108).
• Postoperative recovery. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for postoperative recovery. Details: One preliminary clinical study in adults who had a tonsillectomy shows that taking a specific ginger supplement (Solgar, Leonia) 500 mg twice daily for 7 days along with acetaminophen and antibiotics modestly improves pain and wound healing when compared with acetaminophen and antibiotics alone (96674).
• Postpartum complications. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial in patients with postpartum pain. Details: A small clinical study in patients recovering from vaginal delivery shows that taking ginger powder 500 mg 8-hours post-delivery, followed by 250 mg every 8 hours thereafter for 24 hours, reduces postpartum pain by nearly 1 point on a 10-point rating scale when compared with placebo (107904). It is unclear if this improvement would be considered clinically relevant.
• Radiation-induced nausea and vomiting. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial in patients with radiation-induced nausea and vomiting. Details: A very small study in adults with cervical cancer undergoing treatment with cisplatin and radiotherapy shows that taking ginger 250-500 mg twice daily for 6 weeks in addition to standard antiemetic therapy does not reduce acute or delayed nausea and vomiting when compared with antiemetic therapy alone (113616).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). One small clinical study suggests that oral ginger may improve some symptoms of RA. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with RA shows that taking ginger powder 1500 mg daily for 12 weeks improves disease activity on the Disease Activity Score-28 when compared with placebo (100697). Another small study in adults with RA shows that taking a combination product containing ginger, ashwagandha, black pepper, and colchicum luteum twice daily for 4 weeks does not improve RA disease scores when compared with celecoxib 100 mg orally twice daily (114785). However, the interpretation of these results is limited by. poor methodology, and the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Smoking cessation. Oral ginger has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults in India with a history of smoking 5 or more cigarettes daily for at least 3 years shows that taking a specific combination product containing ginger 50 mg, ashwagandha, cowhage, turmeric and other herbal extracts (Smotect, Smotect India) twice daily for 3 months reduces the number of cigarettes smoked by approximately 3 per day when compared with placebo. This product also reduces levels of alveolar carbon monoxide and carboxyhemoglobin but does not improve lung capacity (112115). However, only data from patients who completed treatment were analyzed, which limits the validity of this study. It is also unclear if these effects are due to ginger, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Swallowing dysfunction. The effects of oral ginger for treating swallowing dysfunction are inconclusive. Reasons for the conflicting findings may relate to the route of administration or the number of treatments provided. Details: Clinical research shows that applying a spray containing ginger and clematix root (Tongyan) to the oropharynx for 28 days is more effective than placebo at treating grade 2 or 3 dysphagia in stroke victims. However, there does not seem to be a beneficial effect in patients with grade 1 dysphagia (20342). Other clinical research in elderly patients with dysphagia shows that taking a single dose of ginger 2 mg orally does not improve swallowing but increases saliva (96671). It is possible that a single dose of ginger is not enough to improve swallowing function.
• Toxin-induced liver damage. Oral ginger might help to prevent liver damage in patients using antimycobacterial drugs. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that a specific ginger supplement (Zintoma, Goldaru) 500 mg taken 30 minutes prior to antimycobacterial drugs daily for 4 weeks reduces the percentage of patients experiencing an increase in liver function enzymes to greater than five times the upper limit of normal by 54% when compared with placebo. Antimycobacterial drugs used for tuberculosis in the study included isoniazid 5 mg/kg, rifampin 10 mg/kg, ethambutol 15 mg/kg, and pyrazinamide 25 mg/kg daily (96670).
• Traumatic brain injury (TBI). Oral ginger has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary research in young adults with subjective memory dysfunction associated with mild TBI, shows that taking a combination of ginger 36 mg and boswellia 360 mg (Memoral) every 8 hours orally for one month improves scores for some, but not all, parameters on an auditory-visual learning test performed at one and three months, when compared with placebo. Total learning scores increased by about 7.5 points with the ginger combination product, compared with 4 points for placebo (110132). It is unclear if these effects are due to ginger, boswellia, or the combination.
• Ulcerative colitis. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for improving symptoms of ulcerative colitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with ulcerative colitis shows that taking ginger powder 1000 mg twice daily for 12 weeks improves disease activity as measured by the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index Questionnaire when compared with taking placebo. However, taking ginger did not improve quality of life, stool frequency, bowel distress, or flatulence when compared with placebo (100694). It is possible that this study was not adequately powered to detect a difference in these secondary outcomes.
• Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). Although there has been interest in using oral ginger for various upper respiratory tract infections, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ginger for this condition.
• Vertigo. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for improving symptoms of vertigo. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking 1 gram of ginger orally as a single dose prior to stimulated vertigo seems to reduce symptoms of vertigo, including nausea, when compared with placebo. However, it does not seem to reduce nystagmus (7623). More evidence is needed to rate ginger for these uses.

(Read more about GINGER)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Diarrhea. Clinical research in adults with acute diarrhea shows that taking guava leaf extract (QG-5) 500 mg every 8 hours for 3 days in addition to oral rehydration therapy (ORT) does not shorten the duration of diarrhea or improve stool consistency or pain intensity when compared with ORT alone. However, there was a reduction in the number of episodes of abdominal pain after the first day of treatment (70318).
• Dysmenorrhea. Clinical research in young women with dysmenorrhea shows that taking guava leaf extract 1 mg or 2 mg three times daily for 5 days starting 24 hours before menstruation for 3 cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo. However, pain was reduced by a small amount in the women with the best compliance (101782).
• Gingivitis. Clinical research in patients with moderate to severe chronic gingivitis shows that using a guava leaf extract 0.15% mouth rinse twice daily with brushing for 30 days is as effective as 0.2% chlorhexidine and more effective than water for reducing gingivitis severity and microbial counts. However, using the guava leaf extract mouth rinse does not appear to improve plaque (101754).
• Hypertension. Preliminary clinical research in patients with essential hypertension shows that eating guava fruit 500-1000 grams daily in place of other foods high in saturated fat and cholesterol for 12 weeks lowers systolic blood pressure by 9.0 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by 8.0 mmHg compared to usual diet (95562).
• Knee pain. Preliminary clinical research in patients with knee pain shows that taking guava leaf extract 1 gram daily for 12 weeks reduces pain and stiffness by a small amount when compared to placebo. There is no effect on function (101758). This study was small and might not have been adequately powered to detect differences. More evidence is needed to rate guava for these uses.

(Read more about GUAVA)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Aging. Although there has been interest in using oral holy basil for aging, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of holy basil for this purpose.
• Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral holy basil for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of holy basil for this condition.
• Dental plaque. Small clinical studies suggest that topical use of holy basil mouthwash, gel, or toothpaste may modestly reduce the severity of dental plaque. Details: Small clinical studies in patients with mild to moderate dental plaque or gingivitis shows that using 10 mL of a mouthwash containing holy basil leaf extract 4% twice daily for 30 days reduces plaque severity by about 17% to 28% when compared with baseline (91570,103621). In one study, this effect was significant when compared with a placebo mouthwash and similar to a mouthwash containing chlorhexidine 0.12% (91570), whereas the other study did not conduct comparisons between study groups (103621). A small clinical study in patients with chronic gingivitis shows that applying holy basil extract 2% gel as a gingival massage twice daily for 30 days reduces plaque severity when compared with baseline (110030). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of statistical comparison to the other study groups. Also, a small clinical trial in children 14-15 years of age shows that brushing with toothpaste containing holy basil leaf extract 4% twice daily for 3 weeks reduces plaque severity when compared with placebo, with similar improvements when compared with a fluorinated toothpaste (104183). Holy basil has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small study shows that rinsing with 10 mL of a solution containing tea tree oil, clove, and holy basil (0.2% to 0.3% of each), for 30 seconds twice daily for 21 days, reduces plaque formation by 64%. This reduction is similar to a 72% reduction seen in the active control group using a mouth rinse containing thymol, eucalyptol, menthol, and methyl salicylate (91446).
• Diabetes. Small clinical studies suggest that oral holy basil may modestly improve glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Details: One small clinical trial in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking holy basil dried leaf powder 2.5 grams daily for 4 weeks decreases fasting and postprandial blood glucose by 18%, compared with a 7% reduction in those taking placebo (12242). Another small clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking holy basil 250 mg twice daily in combination with glyburide 5 mg daily for 3 months reduces fasting blood glucose by 16%, postprandial blood glucose by 13%, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels by 18% when compared with glyburide alone (91571).
• Dyspepsia. Although there has been interest in using oral holy basil for dyspepsia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of holy basil for this purpose.
• Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). It is unclear if oral holy basil is beneficial in patients with GAD. Details: One small, uncontrolled clinical study in patients with GAD shows that taking holy basil leaf extract 500 mg twice daily following meals for 60 days reduces anxiety and associated symptoms of stress and depression when compared to baseline (19575). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of control group.
• Gingivitis. Small clinical studies suggest that topical use of holy basil mouthwash or toothpaste may modestly improve gingivitis. Details: Small clinical studies in patients with mild to moderate dental plaque or gingivitis shows that using 10 mL of a mouthwash containing holy basil leaf extract 4% twice daily for 30 days reduces gingivitis by about 23% to 40% when compared with baseline (91570,103621). In one study, these effects were significant when compared with placebo mouthwash and similar to those of a mouthwash containing chlorhexidine 0.12% (91570), whereas the other study did not conduct statistical comparisons between study groups (103621). A small clinical trial in children 14-15 years of age shows that brushing with toothpaste containing holy basil leaf extract 4% twice daily for 3 weeks reduces the severity of gingivitis when compared with placebo, with similar improvements when compared with a fluorinated toothpaste (104183). However, a small clinical study in patients with chronic gingivitis shows that applying holy basil leaf extract 2% gel as a gingival massage twice daily for 30 days does not reduce gingivitis severity when compared with baseline (110030). Holy basil has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical study shows that rinsing with 10 mL of a solution containing tea tree oil, clove, and holy basil (0.2% to 0.3% of each), for 30 seconds twice daily for 21 days, reduces gum inflammation by 76%. This reduction is similar to a 70% reduction seen in the active control group using a mouth rinse containing thymol, eucalyptol, menthol, and methyl salicylate (91446).
• Headache. Although there has been interest in using oral holy basil for headache, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of holy basil for this purpose.
• Hepatitis. Although there has been interest in using oral holy basil for hepatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of holy basil for this condition.
• Hypercholesterolemia. Although there has been interest in using oral holy basil for hypercholesterolemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of holy basil for this purpose.
• Hypertension. Although there has been interest in using oral holy basil for hypertension, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of holy basil for this purpose.
• Insect repellent. Although there has been interest in using topical holy basil as an insect repellent, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of holy basil for this purpose.
• Insomnia. It is unclear if oral holy basil is beneficial for sleep problems. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with stress and sleep problems (i.e., unrefreshing sleep or difficulty falling or staying asleep) shows that taking holy basil 125 mg twice daily for 8 weeks does not improve patient-reported or wearable tracker scores related to sleep when compared with placebo (112416). However, the interpretation of these results is limited by self-reported outcomes and use of a non-validated measurement tool for sleep (i.e., Fitbit device).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral holy basil is beneficial in overweight or obese patients. Details: One small clinical study in individuals with overweight or obesity shows that taking holy basil extract 250 mg twice daily for 8 weeks slightly reduces body weight and improves levels of triglycerides or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and certain glycemic indices when compared to baseline, but not when compared with no treatment. Holy basil extract also did not improve liver enzymes when compared to baseline or with no treatment (96944).
• Oral submucous fibrosis. It is unclear if topical holy basil paste is beneficial for oral submucous fibrosis. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with oral submucous fibrosis conducted in India shows that applying a paste containing holy basil extract 250 mg intraorally twice daily for 1 month modestly improves mouth opening scores and patient-reported burning sensation at the 3 month follow up when compared to baseline (112424). However, the validity of these findings is limited by poor methodology and lack of a comparator group.
• Respiratory tract infections. Although there has been interest in using oral holy basil for respiratory tract infections, including bronchitis, common cold, influenza, and tuberculosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of holy basil for these conditions.
• Stress. It is unclear if oral holy basil is beneficial in patients with stress. Details: One small clinical trial in patients experiencing various symptoms of stress shows that taking a specific holy basil extract (OciBest, Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd.) 400 mg in the morning and 800 mg at night for 6 weeks decreases self-reported symptoms of stress, including forgetfulness, sexual problems and sleep problems of recent origin, and frequency of exhaustion, when compared with placebo (18107). A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with stress and sleep problems shows that taking holy basil 125 mg twice daily for 8 weeks modestly improves stress scores but does not improve individual symptoms related to stress including anxiety, mood disturbance, physical function, depression, fatigue, or sleep disturbance when compared with placebo (112416). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by self-reported outcome measures and unclear clinical significance.
• Tinea corporis. Although there has been interest in using topical holy basil for tinea corporis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of holy basil for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate holy basil for these uses.

(Read more about HOLY BASIL)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Dyslipidemia. Oral Indian gooseberry seems to be beneficial for dyslipidemia. Details: Meta-analyses of 12 small clinical studies in healthy adults or patients with dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, or metabolic syndrome show that taking Indian gooseberry fruit extract or powder 0.5-3 grams daily or Indian gooseberry fruit 12 grams daily for 2-12 weeks reduces total cholesterol by around 39 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by around 15-34 mg/dL, and triglycerides by around 22-52 mg/dL when compared with control groups. Results are conflicting whether Indian gooseberry increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (111567,111568). Subgroup analysis suggests that Indian gooseberry is more effective at doses greater than 1 gram daily and in adults with triglycerides above 150 mg/dL (111568). Clinical research in patients with dyslipidemia shows that taking Indian gooseberry whole fruit extract (Tri-low, Arjuna Natural Ltd.) 500 mg twice daily for 12 weeks reduces triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 34% and 20%, respectively, compared with 15% and 5%, respectively, in patients taking placebo (99238).
• Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Oral Indian gooseberry seems to be beneficial for reducing symptoms of GERD. Details: Clinical research in adults who have had non-erosive symptoms of GERD for at least 3 months shows that taking Indian gooseberry fruit extract 1000 mg twice daily for 4 weeks reduces the frequency and severity of heartburn and regurgitation by about 63% and 50%, respectively, compared with reductions of 24% and 5%, respectively, in patients taking placebo (99240).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Aging skin. Oral Indian gooseberry has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in healthy, middle-aged females shows that drinking 50 mL of a juice containing Indian gooseberry extract 30-60 mg and lingonberry extract 25-50 mg daily for 12 weeks improves skin elasticity, thickness, wrinkles, and hydration when compared with placebo (102856). It is unclear if these effects are due to Indian gooseberry, lingonberry, or the combination. Another small clinical study in healthy, middle-aged females shows that applying a topical emulsion containing extracts of Indian gooseberry 3% and gotu kola 3% twice daily for 60 days improves skin hydration, some measures of skin wrinkles, and elasticity of the cheek but not the eye when compared with placebo (111571). It is unclear if these effects are due to Indian gooseberry, gotu kola, or the combination.
• Androgenic alopecia. Topical Indian gooseberry has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In individuals with self-perceived hair loss, preliminary clinical research shows that applying a hair product containing Indian gooseberry modestly improves hair growth rate and density, as well as hair thinning, when compared with baseline. Patients used a leave-in product containing Indian gooseberry (Saberry), coconut water solids (Cococin), gamma-L-glutamyl-selenomethionine (Peptiselect), and other ingredients as 3.5 mL in females and 2 mL in males, once daily for 3 months (105353).
• Cancer. Although there is interest in using oral Indian gooseberry for cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of Indian gooseberry for this purpose.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if oral Indian gooseberry is beneficial for the prevention of CVD. Details: A meta-analysis of 9 small clinical studies in adults who are healthy or have CVD risk factors shows that taking Indian gooseberry fruit extract or powder 500-1500 mg daily for 2-12 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by around 15 mg/dL, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol by around 5 mg/dL, triglycerides by around 22 mg/dL, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein when compared with control groups. However, the meta-analysis suggests that Indian gooseberry does not improve high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, or diastolic blood pressure (111567). The validity of these findings is limited by small sample sizes and considerable heterogeneity among the included studies.
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral Indian gooseberry is beneficial for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized adults. Details: A small clinical trial in adults hospitalized with COVID-19 shows that receiving Indian gooseberry powder 2 grams twice daily for 10 days does not impact RT-PCR positivity rate at day 10 when compared with placebo. Additionally, there were no clear trends in clinical improvement in patients receiving Indian gooseberry when compared with placebo. All patients in this study also received oral hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir (110012).
• Diabetes. Several small or limited-quality clinical studies suggest that oral Indian gooseberry may modestly improve glycemic control and blood lipid levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. Details: A moderate-sized, open-label study in adults with newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia shows that taking Indian gooseberry extract, standardized to 10% beta-glucogallin, 2 grams daily for 90 days reduces glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose, and postprandial blood glucose when compared to baseline, with superior effects on fasting blood glucose and postprandial blood glucose when compared with metformin 500 mg (111569). A smaller clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes on stable doses of metformin shows that taking Indian gooseberry fruit extract (Capros, Natreon Inc) 500 mg twice daily for 12 weeks reduces HbA1c by around 0.5% and improves low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglyceride, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels when compared with placebo. Taking a lower dose, 250 mg twice daily, does not seem to improve HbA1c but has a modest effect on lipid levels (105356). Another small clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes using various antidiabetes drugs shows that taking powdered Indian gooseberry fruit 1 gram, 2 grams, or 3 grams daily for 3 weeks modestly reduces fasting and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose levels and improves lipid levels when compared to baseline (105355). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Hangover. It is unclear if oral Indian gooseberry is beneficial for hangover prevention. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking Indian gooseberry leaf extract (Phyllpro) 750 mg daily for 10 days prior to alcohol intoxication modestly reduces some hangover symptoms 10 hours later, including nausea, headache, lack of appetite, and dizziness, when compared with placebo. Blood alcohol levels after 12 hours were also reduced. However, the overall hangover score was not significantly different between groups (99846).
• Hepatitis B. Although there is interest in using oral Indian gooseberry for hepatitis B, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of Indian gooseberry for this condition.
• Hypercholesterolemia. Small studies suggest that oral Indian gooseberry might help to reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking Indian gooseberry might reduce levels of LDL cholesterol in patients with hypercholesterolemia. One preliminary clinical study shows that taking Indian gooseberry 50 grams for 4 weeks decreases LDL cholesterol by 15% when compared to baseline (2077). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking Indian gooseberry fruit extract (Amlamax, Arjuna Natural Ltd.) 500 mg or 1000 mg daily for 6 months reduces levels of LDL cholesterol by about 13% when compared with baseline (99241). Also, one small study shows that taking an Indian gooseberry fruit juice powder 500 mg daily for 6 weeks modestly decreases LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels when compared with baseline (99242). Some preliminary clinical research also shows that Indian gooseberry reduces LDL cholesterol in obese individuals. One small study shows that taking Indian gooseberry fruit extract (Capros, Natreon Inc.) 500 mg twice daily for 12 weeks reduces LDL cholesterol by 16 mg/dL in this population when compared to baseline (92515). However, the validity of these studies is limited by the lack of comparator groups.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral Indian gooseberry is beneficial for hypertension. Details: In patients with uncontrolled hypertension using standard therapies, clinical research shows that taking Indian gooseberry dried fruit powder 500 mg three times daily for 8 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 16% and 12%, respectively, from baseline, which is significantly greater than reductions seen with placebo. The frequency of response to treatment, based on a reduction in SBP or DBP of at least 10 mmHg or 5 mmHg, respectively, was also increased from up to 50% to at least 83% of patients (105352). However, other clinical research in adults with cardiovascular risk factors shows that taking Indian gooseberry 500-1500 mg twice daily for 2-12 weeks does not reduce SBP or DBP more than placebo (105354,111567).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Indian gooseberry has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small, open-label study of adults with IBS shows that taking 7 grams of an Unani medicinal product called Jawarish Shahi, containing Indian gooseberry, terminalia, coriander, cardamom, and willow bark, twice daily for 45 days reduces the severity of IBS, as measured by improvements in abdominal pain and distension, bowel habits, and quality of life, when compared to baseline (111570). The validity of these findings is limited by insufficient blinding and the lack of a comparator group. It is unclear if these effects are due to Indian gooseberry, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral Indian gooseberry is beneficial for metabolic syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with metabolic syndrome shows that taking a specific Indian gooseberry extract (Capros, Natreon Inc.) 250 mg twice daily for 12 weeks reduces total cholesterol by nearly 10%, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 15%, and triglycerides by 10%, and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by about 7% when compared with placebo. Additionally, taking this product as 500 mg twice daily reduces total cholesterol by 14%, LDL cholesterol by 26%, and triglycerides by 19%, and increases HDL cholesterol by 22% when compared with placebo. Both doses also seem to improve markers of endothelial function, oxidative stress, and systemic inflammation (102857).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral Indian gooseberry is beneficial for improving weight loss or metabolic parameters in adults with obesity. Details: Preliminary clinical research in overweight or obese individuals shows that taking Indian gooseberry fruit extract (Capros, Natreon Inc.) 500 mg twice daily for 12 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 16 mg/dL when compared to baseline. However, there was no effect on other lipids or on blood pressure, body weight, or body mass index (92515). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Oral mucositis. It is unclear if oral Indian gooseberry is beneficial in patients with radiation-induced mucositis. Details: A retrospective observational study in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy suggests that rinsing the mouth with Indian gooseberry 1% and povidone-iodine twice daily is associated with delayed development of mucositis and intolerable mucositis and a decreased incidence of intolerable mucositis when compared with povidone-iodine alone (111566). The validity of these findings is limited by the retrospective study design.
• Osteoarthritis. Oral Indian gooseberry has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with knee osteoarthritis suggests that specific Ayurvedic formulas containing Indian gooseberry may be equivalent to glucosamine sulfate 2 grams daily or celecoxib 200 mg daily for reducing pain. Two capsules containing Indian gooseberry 166.66 mg/capsule, ginger 33.33 mg/capsule, and Tinospora cordifolia 73.33 mg/capsule, with or without Boswellia serrata 100 mg/capsule, taken three times daily for 24 weeks, were used. All four treatments reduced active pain by about 28% to 38%, functional pain by 19% to 29%, and functional difficulty by 18% to 25%, with no significant between-group differences in the observed improvements (89557). It is not clear if these effects are due to Indian gooseberry, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Periodontitis. It is unclear if subgingival Indian gooseberry is beneficial for periodontitis. Details: Clinical research in patients with chronic periodontitis shows that the subgingival application of a sustained-release Indian gooseberry fruit 10% gel following scaling and root planing does not affect plaque or gingivitis development over 2-3 months when compared with placebo. However, there was a modest benefit on periodontal destruction based on probing pocket depth (105358).
• Vitiligo. Oral Indian gooseberry has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with vitiligo shows that taking 1 tablet containing Indian gooseberry 100 mg, vitamin E 10 mg, and carotenoids 4.7 mg orally 3 times daily for 6 months, in combination with conventional topical therapy and/or phototherapy, increases re-pigmentation in the head, neck, and trunk and decreases signs of inflammation when compared with conventional treatment alone (92513). More evidence is needed to rate Indian gooseberry for these uses.

(Read more about INDIAN GOOSEBERRY)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Iodine deficiency. Oral iodine supplements, including iodized salt, are effective for improving iodine status and reducing goiter size in adults and children. Iodine supplementation is also recommended during pregnancy in areas at risk for iodine deficiency. Details: Iodine deficiency is associated with several adverse outcomes. The earliest clinical symptom of iodine deficiency is low circulating thyroid hormone and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), followed by thyroid goiter (7135,16747,91398). Iodine deficiency and subsequent hypothyroidism can lead to anovulation, infertility, autoimmune thyroiditis, and gestational hypertension. Iodine deficiency is also associated with increased risk of thyroid cancer (16747). Clinical research shows that taking iodine supplements, including iodized salt, improves iodine status and reduces goiter size in adults with iodine deficiency (16747,55919,103071). Studies also show that taking iodine supplementation, including iodized salt, in areas of endemic iodine deficiency, reduces goiter size in children (16747,55919). When taken during pregnancy for iodine deficiency, iodine supplements and iodized salt reduce both maternal and newborn thyroid size and thyroglobulin; however, the effect on maternal TSH is inconsistent (91399,103070). Although some clinical studies and one analysis show that perinatal use of iodine has no effect on the incidence of thyroid disorders during pregnancy (91399,97240,97241), one analysis shows that iodine supplementation reduces the risk of postpartum hyperthyroidism by 68% when compared with placebo (97240). Taking iodine supplementation before 12 weeks' gestation appears to be more effective than when taken later in pregnancy. Perinatal iodine supplementation has no effect on preterm birth rate (97240,97241). Evidence is limited to females with mild-moderate iodine deficiency; the routine use of iodine supplementation during pregnancy has not been extensively studied. For example, the effect of perinatal supplementation on newborn neurocognitive development is conflicting and the evidence is generally low quality (55976,97241,105880,108706). Despite the limited evidence, iodine supplementation is recommended in areas at risk of deficiency.
• Radiation exposure. Oral potassium iodide prevents thyroid uptake of radioactive iodine. However, it does not protect against other sources of radiation. Details: Taking potassium iodide is effective for preventing the uptake of radioactive iodine by the thyroid (7517,7518). Doses of potassium iodide protect for about 24 hours. Therefore, it should be taken daily until the risk of radiation exposure no longer exists (17575,17576).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Conjunctivitis. Ophthalmic povidone-iodine solution seems to reduce the risk of conjunctivitis in infants. It may also improve the resolution of acute conjunctivitis in adults. It is unclear if it is beneficial in patients with adenoviral conjunctivitis. Details: A meta-analysis of low-quality clinical trials shows that povidone-iodine solutions are more effective than silver nitrate for preventing neonatal conjunctivitis. However, povidone-iodine solutions are not more effective than erythromycin or chloramphenicol (56084). Povidone-iodine in combination with dexamethasone also seems to be helpful in adults. A clinical trial in patients with acute viral conjunctivitis shows that applying povidone-iodine 0.6% with dexamethasone 0.1% four times daily for 4 days improves clinical symptoms and eradiation of viral counts when compared with placebo control (103075). A small clinical study in adults with adenoviral conjunctivitis shows that administering 4-5 drops of a povidone-iodine 5% eye drop solution within 4 days of symptom onset decreases viral load, mucoid discharge, and bulbar edema and redness on day 4 of a 21-day follow-up period, but at no other time points, when compared with a single dose of artificial tears (108705). Due to the single-dose nature of this study, the effects of continued administration are unclear.
• Diabetic foot ulcers. Topical iodine seems to help with the management of diabetic foot ulcer wounds. Details: A small clinical study in patients with diabetic foot ulcers shows that topically applying cadexomer iodine ointment (Iodosorb) for 12 weeks seems to improve healing to a similar degree as using standard treatment with gentamicin solution, streptokinase, and/or dry saline gauze (2200).
• Endometritis. Topical application of iodine prior to cesarean delivery seems to reduce the risk of endometritis. Details: A meta-analysis of eight clinical trials shows that vaginally applying povidone-iodine 1% to 10% solution immediately before cesarean delivery reduces the risk of post-cesarean endometritis by 62% when compared with saline or no cleaning. It also reduces postoperative fever by 13% and wound infection by 23% (99794). These findings are consistent with other meta-analyses (56080,103076). There seems to be no difference in benefit whether povidone-iodine 1%, 5%, or 10% is used. A network meta-analysis of clinical studies in patients having cesarean delivery suggests that povidone-iodine is no better at preventing endometritis than using chlorhexidine or metronidazole; however, there may not have been sufficient power to detect a difference (103076).
• Fibrocystic breast disease. Oral iodine seems to reduce breast pain in patients with fibrocystic breast disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with fibrocystic breast disease shows that taking sodium iodide, protein bound iodide, or molecular iodine for 6 months or longer improves mastalgia and reduces breast nodules when compared with baseline or control. Molecular iodine in doses of 70-90 mcg/kg appears to be more effective and better tolerated than the other forms (2197). Another clinical study in patients with cyclic mastalgia due to fibrocystic breast disease shows that taking tablets containing molecular iodine 3000-6000 mcg daily for 5 months reduces pain, tenderness, and nodularity in patients with cyclic mastalgia when compared with placebo. However, a lower dose of 1500 mcg daily does not appear to be beneficial (55960).
• Oral mucositis. Rinsing the mouth with a povidone-iodine solution may prevent oral mucositis from radiochemotherapy. Details: Small clinical studies in patients receiving radiation and chemotherapy for cancer shows that using an oral povidone-iodine rinse seems to reduce the risk for oral mucositis when compared with using sterile water (2198,2199).
• Periodontitis. Rinsing with povidone-iodine solution in addition to scaling and root planing seems to be modestly beneficial in patients with periodontitis. Details: A meta-analysis of mostly small clinical studies in patients with chronic periodontitis suggests that rinsing with povidone-iodine 0.1% to 10% during scaling and root planing modestly reduces the periodontal pocket depth when compared with rinsing with water or saline solution (56072).
• Postoperative infection. Povidone-iodine antisepsis prevents postoperative infection when compared with inactive controls such as normal saline and water. However, it is unclear how it compares to active controls such as chlorhexidine; practice guidelines are conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intraoperative application of povidone-iodine reduces the risk of surgical site infection by approximately 40% when compared with saline or no irrigation (56088). However, research comparing povidone-iodine with other antiseptics such as chlorhexidine is conflicting, as are official guidelines for surgical antisepsis. Many of these discrepancies seem to be related to the presence or absence of alcohol in the preparation. A meta-analysis of clinical research comparing aqueous or alcohol-based povidone-iodine shows that using alcohol-based chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis is more effective for preventing postoperative surgical site infections and may be associated with a lower overall positive culture rate. However, since evidence for both aqueous and alcohol-based solutions of povidone-iodine were included in this study, it is unclear if this may have affected outcomes (108710). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guideline recommends chlorhexidine solution as the first choice for preparing the skin for surgery, with povidone-iodine solution as a second-line option. The antiseptic solutions are recommended to be alcohol-based as long as the surgical site is not near a mucous membrane (105906). The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines also recommend alcohol-based chlorhexidine solutions over either alcohol-based or aqueous povidone-iodine for preventing surgical site infections. However, some experts have expressed concern that these recommendations are based on faulty evidence, as some studies used povidone-iodine preparations with lower alcohol amounts than their comparator groups (105898). In fact, the guideline from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) does not differentiate between povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine antiseptic solutions as long as they are alcohol-based (105905).
• Thyroid storm. Oral iodine is recommended as an adjunct to standard treatment for thyroid storm. Details: The American Thyroid Association (ATA) and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) recommend a multimodality approach for treating thyroid storm that includes taking five drops of a saturated solution of potassium iodine every 6 hours (15,92699).
• Thyroid nodules. Combining oral iodine with thyroxine seems to improve the resolution of thyroid nodules. Details: A clinical study in patients with benign nodular thyroid disease and possible iodine deficiency shows that taking iodized salt 200 mcg daily in addition to thyroxine 1.5 mcg/kg daily after surgery seems to reduce the size of the thyroid remnant by 40%, compared with a 10% reduction in patients given thyroxine alone (55927). Also, one large clinical trial in patients with nodular goiter shows that taking potassium iodide 150 mcg daily in combination with levothyroxine 50-100 mcg daily for 12 months reduces nodule volume by about 17%, compared with 7% in the group using levothyroxine alone (91392).
• Venous leg ulcers. Topical cadexomer iodine seems to improve the healing of venous leg ulcers; however, it is unclear if applying povidone-iodine is beneficial. Details: A meta-analysis of four small clinical studies in patients with venous leg ulcers shows that applying cadexomer iodine results in complete healing of ulcers in 33% of patients after 4-12 weeks, compared with only 15% of patients receiving standard care alone. However, use of cadexomer iodine was associated with more adverse effects than standard care. Furthermore, preliminary clinical research shows that applying cadexomer iodine is comparable to hydrocolloid dressing, paraffin gauze dressing, dextranomer, and silver-impregnated dressings for improving the rate of complete healing. A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research show that povidone-iodine has comparable healing rates when compared with amoxicillin, hydrocolloid dressings, and moist or foam dressings (99798). These findings were consistent with an older version of this meta-analysis (56076).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Catheter-related infections. Topical povidone-iodine seems to be less effective than chlorhexidine for preventing infections from intravascular catheters. Furthermore, it does not seem to reduce the risk of catheter-related urinary tract infections. Details: One meta-analysis of clinical research shows that topical application of povidone-iodine reduces the risk of bloodstream infections when applied at the insertion site of hemodialysis central venous catheters (55883). However, disinfecting catheter insertion sites using povidone-iodine seems to be less effective for preventing blood stream infections in patients receiving central venous, pulmonary artery, or peripheral artery catheters when compared with chlorhexidine solutions (55883,55916). In addition, periurethral cleansing with povidone-iodine 10% prior to bladder catheterization, as well as bladder irrigation with povidone-iodine 2% prior to urinary catheter removal, does not seem to reduce the risk of urinary tract infections when compared with placebo (56058,56126).
• Prematurity. Maternal iodine supplementation does not seem to impact neurological development in premature infants. Details: A meta-analysis of two clinical trials in premature infants shows that adding iodine to enteral or parenteral feeds does not improve mental, visual, or auditory development or reduce the risk of death when compared with no iodine supplementation (99797).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Chyluria. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with chyluria. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chyluria suggests that using povidone-iodine 0.2% solution as a sclerosant in renal pelvic instillation sclerotherapy (RPIS) may be as effective as using silver nitrate 1% (55970).
• Corneal ulceration. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with corneal ulceration. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that administering povidone-iodine 2.5% eye drops every two hours for two weeks in addition to standard antibiotic therapy does not reduce visual impairment in patients with corneal ulcers when compared with standard antibiotic therapy alone (55971).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if rinsing with a povidone-iodine mouthwash and using a povidone-iodine nasal spray and ointment can reduce the spread of COVID-19. Details: A small clinical study in adults with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 shows that orally swishing and gargling 25 mL of povidone-iodine (PI) 1% solution, then, into each nostril, spraying 2.5 mL of PI 1% solution and applying one dab of PI 10% ointment, and repeating this 4 times daily for 5 days does not seem to alter the quantity of viral RNA over time when compared with control (105877). The validity of this finding is limited because all study participants achieved negative viral titers on the third day of the study.
• Cutaneous sporotrichosis. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with cutaneous sporotrichosis; research is conflicting. Details: Anecdotal reports and case series suggest that taking saturated solution of potassium iodide (SSKI) orally is effective for most patients when used alone or in combination with another antifungal, including terbinafine or itraconazole (17562,17563,17564,17565,17566,17567,17568,17569,17570,17571) (17572,17573). In one non-controlled clinical study, treatment with SSKI, starting with 3 drops (150 mg potassium iodide) daily and titrating up, resulted in symptom resolution in about 90% of patients after about 33 days of treatment (17561). However, some patients are not able to take SSKI due to intolerable side effects (17561,17572).
• Hyperthyroidism. It is unclear if oral potassium iodide is beneficial for patients with Graves' disease undergoing total thyroidectomy. Details: A retrospective study in patients with Graves' disease undergoing total thyroidectomy shows that preoperative administration of saturated solution of potassium iodide (SSKI) 5% does not reduce the rate of postoperative complications, such as transient or permanent hypoparathyroidism, transient recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy, definitive RLN palsy, and cervical hematoma, when compared with no preoperative administration (108707).
• Infant development. It is unclear if maternal iodine supplementation impacts neurological development in infants. Details: Three-year follow-up data from a clinical study in infants and breastfeeding females shows that maternal supplementation of iodine 150 mcg daily improves child cognitive scores, but does not affect language or motor scores, when compared with placebo. Supplementation with a higher dose of 300 mcg daily yielded similar cognitive, language, and motor scores as the 150 mcg dose (108706). This finding aligns with the daily recommended dietary allowance (RDA) of 290 mcg during lactation, which is sometimes achieved by augmenting the diet with a 150-mcg iodine supplement (7135).
• Postoperative bleeding. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with postoperative bleeding. Details: A small clinical study suggests that irrigating extraction sockets with povidone-iodine 1% stops bleeding in a greater number of patients following tooth extraction when compared with a saline solution (56011).
• Rhinosinusitis. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial in patients with rhinosinusitis. Details: A small prospective cohort study in patients with recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis has found that using a povidone-iodine 0.08% nasal rinse every other day for 7 weeks in addition to standard therapy improves symptoms and reduces signs of infection when compared with baseline (103074). However, one small clinical study in patients with a history of sinus surgery and acute exacerbations of chronic sinusitis shows that receiving povidone-iodine nasal irrigations twice daily for 30 days is no different than irrigations with mupirocin or normal saline for improving nasal symptoms. However, mupirocin tended to reduce bacteria count to a greater extent than the povidone-iodine solution (105878). This finding is limited due to small study size and potential lack of power to detect differences between groups.
• Thyroid cancer. It is unclear if dietary iodine is associated with complications in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. Details: A retrospective study in patients in China with papillary thyroid cancer has found that dietary intake of iodine resulting in serum concentrations greater than 90 mcg/L is associated with a 75% increased risk of cervical lymph node metastases when compared with concentrations less than 45 mcg/L (108708). Actual dietary intake of iodine was not reported, limiting the validity of this finding.
• Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). It is unclear if oral iodine rinse is beneficial for the prevention of VAP. Details: A small clinical study in patients with severe head trauma suggests that regularly rinsing the throat with 20 mL of povidone-iodine 10% solution decreases the risk for VAP when compared with using a saline rinse (56003).
• Wound healing. It is unclear if topical iodine is beneficial for wound healing. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that topical iodine, as cadexomer iodine or povidone-iodine, is superior to non-antiseptic dressings and some antiseptic agents, such as silver sulfadiazine, for reducing wound size. However, iodine seems to be less effective than local antibiotics such as rifamycin (56083). More evidence is needed to rate iodine for these uses.

(Read more about IODINE)

EFFECTIVE

• Anemia of chronic disease. Oral and intravenous iron in combination with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are effective for treating anemia of chronic disease. Details: Iron supplementation with ESAs is effective for treating anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or chemotherapy. During therapy with ESAs, iron levels should be monitored and supplementation provided as needed to ensure that the response is not limited by lack of iron for erythropoiesis (1087,1091,20110,20111,110192). Research shows that intravenous iron appears to be more effective than oral supplements for this purpose (20112,20113). In patients with CKD, intravenous iron at total doses from 2232 mg over 6 months to 1020 mg over one week increases hemoglobin levels more than oral doses of 4-6 mg/kg daily or 325 mg daily for up to 6 months (20112). Some research has evaluated the effect of intravenous or oral iron in patients not treated with ESAs. In patients with cancer or CKD, oral iron supplements have been shown to improve iron status (110184,110192). However, overall benefits of iron alone remain unclear in treated or untreated patients with cancer and more research is needed to rule out an increase in mortality and to determine any effect on blood transfusion requirements (110192). Preliminary clinical research shows that children aged 6 months to 10 years with HIV and anemia who take elemental iron 3 mg/kg daily along with a multivitamin for 3 months have a 41% lower chance of having persistent anemia at 3 months when compared with multivitamins alone (95432).
• Iron deficiency anemia. Oral and intravenous iron are effective for treating or preventing iron deficiency anemia. The benefits of iron supplementation in people with iron deficiency without anemia are unclear. Details: Oral iron supplements, mainly as ferrous sulfate, are effective for treating and preventing iron deficiency anemia in adults, children, and infants (1089,7135,17495,17496,17497,103806,20114,20115,91183,96621)(104680,104681,112601). Other forms are also effective, including sodium iron ethylenediaminetetra-acetate (NaFeEDTA), iron(III)-hydroxide polymaltose complex (IPC), iron protein succinylate, iron bisglycinate, and lactoferrin with iron (20117,20118,110189). Treatment with iron supplements should increase hemoglobin levels by 1 gram/dL every 2-3 weeks. However, even after hemoglobin has normalized, it may take up to 4 months for iron stores to be replenished (17497). Historically, treatment of iron deficiency anemia with oral iron supplements has typically consisted of a daily dosing regimen, often taken in divided doses to reduce adverse effects. In more recent years, however, intermittent iron supplementation (1-3 doses/week) has become preferred for some patients, particularly those with mild anemia, due to better absorption and a possible reduction in side effects compared to daily dosing. One small clinical study shows that taking ferrous sulfate 60 mg on alternate days in single doses improves iron absorption when compared to once daily dosing (96630). Another small clinical study in females with iron-deficiency anemia shows that fractional iron absorption is 40% to 50% higher with alternate-day dosing compared with daily dosing. Furthermore, total iron absorption was shown to be similar for alternate day dosing of elemental iron 200 mg compared with daily dosing of 100 mg, but the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects may be lower for the alternate day dosing regimen (101514). A meta-analysis of 25 clinical trials, including 10,996 menstruating females with or without pre-existing iron deficiency and/or anemia, shows that intermittent iron reduces the risk of anemia and increases hemoglobin and serum ferritin when compared with placebo or no intervention. This meta-analysis did not identify differences in the risk of anemia, hemoglobin, or serum ferritin between intermittent and daily iron supplementation. However, it did show that females receiving intermittent dosing had a 59% reduction in the risk for adverse effects. The validity of these findings is limited by significant heterogeneity in the enrolled populations and selected dosing strategies, including frequency of intermittent dosing, total weekly dose, and duration of follow-up. In addition, the subgroup analyses performed by baseline anemia, hemoglobin, and serum ferritin, as well as duration of follow-up, showed differing overall conclusions when comparing intermittent and daily iron supplementation. While intermittent dosing appears to be beneficial when compared with daily dosing for some patients with iron deficiency anemia, intermittent dosing may be less effective than daily iron supplementation in some patients (103806). For patients with severe anemia, twice daily dosing may be preferred to alternate day dosing due to faster response. A small clinical study in patients with iron deficiency anemia shows that taking ferrous sulfate 200 mg twice daily is more effective at increasing hemoglobin levels by 3 weeks when compared with ferrous sulfate 400 mg taken on alternate days in single doses (102864). Intermittent iron supplementation has also been investigated in children. A meta-analysis of clinical research in children and adolescents with or without pre-existing iron deficiency and/or anemia shows that taking iron supplements 1-2 times weekly is similarly effective as 3-7 times weekly for decreasing iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia. However, ferritin and hemoglobin levels increased to a greater extent with 3-7 times weekly supplementation (112601). Blood transfusion may be required for some patients with severe iron deficiency anemia who have symptoms such as dyspnea and fatigue (17497). Intravenous iron should be considered in patients who cannot tolerate oral iron or in patients with chronic bleeding or intestinal malabsorption (17497). Guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology recommend treatment with iron while awaiting investigations to rule out gastrointestinal issues in adults in the absence of an alternative explanation. The guidelines recommend ferrous sulfate, fumarate, or gluconate as one tablet daily. If adverse effects occur, intake can be reduced to once every other day, or alternative oral or parenteral sources of iron can be used. Parenteral sources should be used if oral sources are contraindicated or ineffective. Treatment should be monitored and continued after hemoglobin levels are normalized (110193). Iron supplementation may also be beneficial in patients with iron deficiency without anemia, which can cause fatigue and reduced well-being, although guidelines are lacking. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in adults with iron deficiency but not anemia shows that supplemental iron improves iron stores and hemoglobin levels. In addition, iron moderately reduces self-reported fatigue, but not physical capacity, when compared with placebo. Oral ferrous sulfate was used in most studies included in the analysis; however, intravenous or intramuscular iron were also used (104684).
• Pregnancy-related iron deficiency. Oral iron is effective for preventing pregnancy-related iron deficiency. Details: Clinical research shows that taking iron orally at an average daily dose of 20-225 mg of elemental iron increases maternal hemoglobin levels by up to 1 gram/dL when compared with placebo and reduces the risk of maternal anemia by 62% to 100% (20122,20123,20124,110180,110188). Some clinicians may recommend alternating days of iron administration to reduce gastrointestinal adverse effects. A pooled analysis shows that taking iron supplements on alternating days during pregnancy maintains adequate iron intake and reduces gastrointestinal adverse effects when compared with taking iron daily (96625). Various forms of oral iron seem to be equally effective for raising hemoglobin levels (110185,110188). However, in patients with anemia during pregnancy, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose were more effective than oral ferrous sulfate for improving hemoglobin levels (110185).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Breath-holding attacks. Oral iron seems to be effective for reducing the frequency of breath-holding attacks in children with iron deficiency. Details: The incidence of breath-holding attacks is increased in children with iron deficiency or iron deficiency anemia. Most research shows that oral supplementation with ferrous sulfate 3-6 mg/kg daily for 4-16 weeks reduces the frequency of breath-holding attacks in children aged 1-72 months (20128,104682,104683). The best evidence comes from a meta-analysis of one randomized controlled trial and 11 observational single arm studies (104682). In this analysis, approximately 84% of children experienced at least a 50% decreased frequency of breath-holding attacks (104682). Some preliminary clinical research also shows that administering intramuscular iron reduces the frequency of breath-holding attacks and increases remission in children with iron deficiency anemia (20128).
• Cognitive function. Oral iron seems to be effective for improving cognitive function in children and adolescents with iron deficiency. Details: Taking iron orally seems to improve cognitive function in iron-deficient children and adolescents (20121,112600). For example, ferrous sulfate 650 mg twice daily for 8 weeks improved verbal learning and memory in non-anemic iron-deficient adolescent females (1095). Ferrous sulfate 50 mg twice weekly for 16 weeks appeared to improve attention measures in adolescent females with possible anemia (91186). Iron also appears to reverse developmental and learning deficits caused by iron-deficiency in anemic infants (1104). Some clinical research is focused on children and adolescents from low- and middle-income countries. In children aged 5-19 years with or without iron-deficiency anemia, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that iron supplementation for 3-8 months dose-dependently improves measured intelligence by a modest amount. However, there was no effect on other measures of cognition, including attention or memory (110181). Another meta-analysis of clinical research in school age children shows that taking iron for 2-12 months modestly improves intelligence, attention, and memory, but not educational achievement, when compared with placebo or no intervention. However, sub-analyses show that any benefits are limited to children with anemia (112600).
• Heart failure. Intravenous iron seems to be effective for improving recovery in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency. It is unclear if oral iron is effective. Details: Iron deficiency is common in patients with heart failure (17499,112597,112598,112599). Individual clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research in patients with heart failure show that administering intravenous iron, as ferric carboxymaltose, iron dextran, iron isomaltoside, or iron sucrose, for at least 12 weeks modestly improves quality of life, increases exercise capacity, and reduces hospitalizations when compared with placebo or standard care. However, there was no effect on all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality (17498,91179,110176,110187,112597,112598,112599). Some individual clinical trials have used intravenous ferric carboxymaltose 200 mg or iron sucrose 200 mg in patients with mild or moderate heart failure and iron deficiency (17498,91179). Guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology suggest that treatment with parenteral iron improves symptoms and quality of life in patients with functional iron deficiency related to CHF (110193). Limited research has investigated the effect of oral iron in this population. A small meta-analysis of clinical research shows with low certainty that taking iron orally has beneficial effects on serum ferritin and left ventricular ejection fraction (110178). Most research shows that taking oral iron does not improve hemoglobin levels, quality of life, or exercise capacity when compared with placebo (100970,110178). However, one small clinical trial shows that taking oral iron modestly improves iron status and overall symptoms and increases the 6-minute walking distance by about 46 meters, compared with a reduction of only 14 meters in those taking placebo (110183). Some doses used in individual clinical studies have included iron polysaccharide 150 mg twice daily for 16 weeks and ferrous sulfate 200 mg three times daily for 12 weeks (100970,110183).
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). Oral and intravenous iron seem to be beneficial for RLS. The American Academy of Neurology recommends a combination of oral ferrous sulfate and vitamin C or intravenous ferric carboxymaltose for patients with RLS. Details: RLS is commonly associated with iron deficiency anemia. Some clinical research shows that taking iron in the form of ferrous sulfate 325 mg twice daily for 12 weeks reduces RLS symptoms comparably to pramipexole. Symptoms such as leg discomfort, need to move, and sleep disturbances improved considerably in about half of the patients taking either treatment (91181). Additional clinical research shows that taking ferrous sulfate 325 mg twice daily along with vitamin C 100 mg twice daily for 12 weeks reduces symptoms of RLS when compared with vitamin C alone in patients with RLS and low-normal serum ferritin levels (94189). Based on these results, clinical practice guidelines by the American Academy of Neurology report that taking this combination of oral ferrous sulfate and vitamin C is likely to improve symptoms in patients with RLS and low-normal serum ferritin (93587). Intravenous iron may also reduce symptoms of RLS. Clinical practice guidelines by the American Academy of Neurology report that two doses of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose 500 mg given 5 days apart are likely to improve symptoms and quality of life within 28 days in patients with moderate to severe RLS, regardless of serum ferritin levels. Intravenous iron sucrose has also been evaluated in patients with RLS, but there is currently insufficient available evidence to support or refute the use of this form of iron for treating RLS (93587).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral iron does not seem to improve athletic performance. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in adults of childbearing age shows that iron supplementation improves some exercise performance measures, such as maximal oxygen uptake capacity, but not others, such as time until exhaustion and energy consumption, when compared with control (91184). Another meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with iron deficiency without anemia shows that iron supplementation improves subjective measures of fatigue, but does not improve exercise time to exhaustion or other measures of physical capacity (104684). A small clinical study in healthy children shows that taking iron supplements or consuming food providing iron 30-200 mg daily for 1-2 months improves running performance when compared with placebo. This was demonstrated by reductions of heart rate of 6.6 to 8 beats per minute during the running exercise. One preliminary study included in this analysis also showed that iron supplementation improved treadmill endurance time (20140).
• Child growth. Oral iron does not seem to be beneficial for child growth. Details: Meta-analyses of mainly preliminary clinical research show that oral iron supplementation, at doses averaging 2-80 mg or 1-10 mg/kg elemental iron daily for up to 52 weeks, does not increase growth rate in children (20131,20132,20133,95434).
• Preterm labor. Oral iron does not seem to prevent preterm labor and may actually increase the risk in malaria-endemic regions. Details: A meta-analysis of results from five clinical studies shows that maternal intake of iron as ferrous sulfate 20-60 mg daily for 14-26 weeks starting in the second trimester of pregnancy does not affect the length of gestation or increase birthweight of the infant (95434). In females from a malaria-endemic area who have never been pregnant before, another clinical study shows that taking ferrous gluconate 60 mg and folic acid 2.8 mg weekly, starting before conception and continuing to the first antenatal visit, may more than double the risk of preterm birth, defined as a delivery under 37 weeks gestation, when compared with folic acid alone (100969). Some research suggests that the adverse outcome in this latter study may be explained by a rise in hepcidin levels in pregnant patients with malaria. Hepcidin is a hormone that regulates iron absorption and distribution, and malaria can upregulate hepcidin. High levels of hepcidin can decrease iron absorption, stimulate inflammatory processes, and cause progesterone withdrawal, leading to preterm labor (102863).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• ACE inhibitor-induced cough. It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial in patients with this condition. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking ferrous sulfate 256 mg daily reduces or eliminates cough induced by ACE inhibitors such as captopril (Capoten), enalapril (Vasotec), lisinopril (Prinivil, Zestril), and others, when compared with placebo (7307).
• Androgenic alopecia. Oral iron has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients, its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with androgenic alopecia or telogen effluvium shows that taking one tablet daily of a specific product (GFM Oral, Cantabria Labs), providing an unknown dose of iron in combination with selenium, taurine, cysteine, methionine, and hydrolyzed collagen, along with conventional therapy, consisting primarily of finasteride or minoxidil, for 12 weeks improves hair loss when compared with conventional therapy alone (111636). It is unclear if this effect is due to iron, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial in children with ADHD. Details: Three small clinical studies in children with ADHD and iron deficiency shows that taking oral iron improves some measures of ADHD after 1-3 months of treatment when compared with baseline or placebo. These studies used ferrous sulfate 5 mg/kg daily, ferrous sulfate 80 mg daily, ferrous fumarate 200 mg daily for children weighing up to 30 kg, or ferrous fumarate 400 mg daily for children weighing more than 30 kg (1093,16013,110191).
• Child development. It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial for improving development in non-anemic children. Details: Some observational research has found that iron deficiency in infancy is associated with poor verbal performance and social skills in childhood (102862). It is unknown whether iron supplementation can ameliorate these developmental issues. In non-anemic infants and children, preliminary clinical research shows that iron does not improve cognitive performance; the evidence for the benefits of iron on psychomotor development is conflicting (20129,20130,91315,96616,96626).
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial for esophageal cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that taking iron supplements is associated with a 32% lower risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma when compared to never taking iron supplements. However, use of iron supplements is not associated with a lower risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (95435).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral iron is beneficial in patients with fatigue due to iron deficiency without anemia. Details: A meta-analysis of mainly preliminary clinical research in adults with iron deficiency without anemia shows that iron reduces self-reported fatigue moderately more than placebo (104684). A specific ferrous sulfate supplement (Tardyferon; Pierre Fabre Médicament) providing 80 mg of elemental iron daily for 4-12 weeks was used in two studies included in this analysis (11406,91188).
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In patients with active IBD, intravenous iron may be more beneficial than oral iron due to impaired absorption. However, it may also increase the risk of infection in these patients. Details: Since the absorption of oral iron may be impaired in patients with active symptoms of IBD, guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology suggest that treatment with parenteral iron may be needed in patients with IBD who have moderate to severe iron-deficiency anemia (110193). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research in this population shows that administering IV iron, usually as iron sucrose or ferric carboxymaltose, increases the risk of infection by 73% when compared with oral iron or no iron (110186).
• Postoperative recovery. It is unclear if intravenous iron is beneficial for recovery following cardiac surgery. Details: A meta-analysis of low- to moderate-quality clinical research in patients with preoperative iron-deficiency anemia shows that treatment with intravenous iron before cardiac surgery does not improve the rate of transfusions or the length of stay in the intensive care unit or hospital when compared with control groups, including placebo, oral iron, or no treatment. Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous iron does not reduce postoperative mortality rates (110182).
• Postpartum depression. Although there has been interest in using iron for postpartum depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of iron for this condition.
• Prematurity. Enteral iron seems to be beneficial for some measures of development in preterm infants. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in preterm or low birthweight infants fed human milk shows that enteral iron supplementation increases linear growth and reduces the risk of anemia when compared with control groups receiving no iron supplementation. However, there was no effect on serum ferritin, weight, head circumference, cognitive development, risk of infection, or risk of necrotising enterocolitis (110177). Additional clinical research in infants born at 24-28 weeks' gestation shows that a higher average enteral iron dose by 60 days of age is positively associated with cognitive performance at 2 years of corrected age. However, this association was not present for iron doses received at 90 days of age (110190). More evidence is needed to rate iron for these uses.

(Read more about IRON)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bladder cancer. It is unclear if consuming kale in the diet can reduce the risk of bladder cancer. Details: Population research suggests that patients with bladder cancer consumed approximately 0.18 fewer cups of cruciferous vegetables, such as cabbage, Brussels sprout, cauliflower, broccoli, kale, or collards, on a weekly basis in the year prior to diagnosis when compared with people without bladder cancer. The effects of kale, specifically, are unclear (14864). Other population research suggests that eating at least five servings per week of cruciferous vegetables, such as cauliflower, Brussels sprout, cabbage, broccoli, and kale, is associated with a 51% reduction in the risk of developing bladder cancer in males when compared with eating up to one serving per week. However, higher intake of kale alone does not seem to be associated with a reduced risk of bladder cancer (26184).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if consuming kale in the diet can reduce the risk of breast cancer. Details: Population research suggests that the highest dietary intake of cruciferous vegetables, including broccoli, Brussels sprout, cabbage, cauliflower, collards, and kale, is associated with a slight increase in the risk of breast cancer in premenopausal adults when compared with the lowest intake (26188). Cruciferous vegetables might increase urinary levels of 2-hydroxyestrone, and its ratio to 16-alpha-hydroxyestrone, which could reduce the risk of breast cancer. However, research in pre-menopausal adults shows that taking a dried kale and Brussels sprout supplement, 3.3 grams daily for 8 weeks, or increasing dietary intake of Brussels sprout or broccoli by one 40-gram serving daily, does not increase urinary levels of 2-hydroxyestrone, or its ratio to 16-alpha-hydroxyestrone, when compared with placebo (112086). In postmenopausal adults, the highest intake of cruciferous vegetables appears to be associated with a statistically insignificant reduced risk of breast cancer (26188).
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although there is interest in oral kale for IBD, there is insufficient reliable information available about the use of kale for this purpose.
• Menopausal symptoms. Although there is interest in oral kale for reducing menopausal symptoms, there is insufficient reliable information available about the use of kale for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate kale for these uses.

(Read more about KALE)

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Abortion. Despite traditional use for the induction of second trimester abortion, most research shows that intravaginal laminaria does not significantly reduce time to delivery or improve abortion rates, and it may actually worsen some outcomes when compared with standard of care. Details: One clinical study shows that intravaginal administration of laminaria along with misoprostol does not improve second trimester abortion rates at 24 and 48 hours after treatment initiation when compared with using only misoprostol. Also, using laminaria along with misoprostol does not shorten delivery time when compared with misoprostol alone (95688). Another small clinical study shows that adding intravaginal laminaria to misoprostol therapy significantly increases induction time and the need for opioid analgesics when compared with misoprostol alone (109576). Also, a small clinical study in patients undergoing second trimester abortions shows that intravaginal laminaria increases pain with cervical ripening and induction-to-delivery time when compared with mifepristone (109577). A retrospective study in 126 patients undergoing second trimester abortions has found that intravaginal administration of laminaria (Dilateria, Cooper Surgical) one day before using misoprostol might actually prolong delivery time by about 6 hours and does not improve abortion rates at 24 hours after induction when compared with misoprostol alone (105806). Some research shows that intravaginal administration of laminaria (Dilateria, Milex Products Inc.) one day before using prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) suppositories to induce second trimester abortions shortens the delivery time by about 3 hours when compared with PGE2 suppositories alone; however, the incidence of febrile episodes is about 2.3-fold higher for patients treated with laminaria (94045). Also, one small clinical study shows that intravaginal administration of laminaria the night before a scheduled abortion reduces procedure time by around 4 minutes, increases cervical dilation at the time of abortion, and reduces the need for additional dilation when compared with misoprostol treatment on the day of abortion. However, more patients preferred misoprostol over laminaria (109575). Laminaria has also been compared with a mechanical cervical dilation device, called Dilapan-S. A small clinical study in patients undergoing second trimester surgical abortion shows that intravaginal administration of laminaria for cervical preparation has no effect on pain scores or analgesic use following dilator placement or dilation and evacuation (D&E) when compared with Dilapan-S. The validity of these findings may be limited by the single-blinded nature of the study, as well as significant baseline differences between the treatment groups with respect to vaginal parity (105805).
• Parturition. Intravaginal administration of laminaria does not seem to be beneficial for cervical ripening. Details: While some research suggests that intravaginal laminaria might reduce the duration of induction, results are conflicting. Additionally, studies suggest that intravaginal laminaria does not seem to reduce the incidence of birth by caesarean section (8945,95689,102765). Also, a small observational study has found that intravaginal laminaria is associated with a greater risk of endometritis and fetal infectious complications when compared with a control group not receiving laminaria (8945).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acute radiation syndrome. Although there has been interest in using oral laminaria for acute radiation syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of laminaria for this purpose.
• Cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral laminaria for cancer prevention, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of laminaria for this purpose.
• Hypertension. Although there has been interest in using oral laminaria for hypertension, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of laminaria for this purpose.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral laminaria is beneficial in patients with obesity. Details: A small clinical study in overweight Japanese adults shows that taking iodine-reduced laminaria powder 2 grams, providing 1 gram of alginate, three times daily for 8 weeks reduces body fat percentage in males, but not females, when compared with placebo. Laminaria does not affect body weight or body mass index when compared with placebo (109572).
• Radiation exposure. Although there has been interest in using oral laminaria to minimize environmental radiation exposure, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of laminaria for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate laminaria for these uses.

(Read more about LAMINARIA)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Lemon has only been evaluated in combination with quince in a nasal spray for hay fever; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with grass pollen allergy shows that using a specific nasal spray (Gencydo, Weleda AG) containing lemon and quince three times daily for 7 days does not improve the symptoms of allergic rhinitis when compared with placebo. In this study, using the nasal spray reduced airway resistance during inspiration at 10 and 20 minutes after pollen exposure, and reduced airway resistance during expiration at 20 minutes after pollen exposure (98826).
• Anxiety. It is unclear if aromatherapy with lemon essential oil reduces test anxiety. Details: A small clinical study in first year nursing students in Turkey shows that administering aromatherapy with lemon essential oil for 15 minutes prior to an exam reduces test anxiety scores when compared with control students (110779). However, it is unclear whether any improvements are clinically significant or lead to improved test scores.
• Halitosis. Lemon essential oil has only been evaluated in combination with other essential oils; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary research in males with dementia in a long-term care facility shows that cleaning the tongue, gums, and teeth with a solution of lemon, peppermint, and tea tree essential oils twice daily for 7 days improves oral condition, measured on the Korean Oral Assessment Guide scale, increases salivary pH into the normal range, and decreases halitosis score when compared with saline control. On a scale of 0 to 5, the essential oil mixture reduced the halitosis score by 1.24 points, compared with 0.2 points for the control (112957).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral lemon is beneficial in patients with high blood pressure. Details: A small, prospective, population study in middle-aged Japanese women has found that increased lemon intake is associated with a modest reduction in systolic, but not diastolic, blood pressure (93471).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). It is unclear if oral lemon juice is beneficial for recurrent idiopathic calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Details: A randomized, controlled trial in patients with recurrent idiopathic calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis shows that taking fresh lemon juice 60 mL orally twice daily for 2 years with a standard diet does not improve the time to stone recurrence when compared with no supplementation. The validity of these findings is limited due to poor patient adherence, which declined from 79% at 6 months, to 68% at 1 year, and 48% at 2 years. When restricted to a 1-year follow-up, stone recurrence occurred in 10% of patients taking lemon juice, compared with 21% of patients in the control group; this difference was statistically significant (107489).
• Meniere disease. Although there is interest in using lemon orally for Meniere disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lemon for this condition.
• Myocardial infarction (MI). It is unclear if aromatherapy with lemon essential oil is beneficial in patients with acute MI. Details: A small clinical study in hospitalized patients with acute MI shows that administering aromatherapy with lemon essential oil over 3 days moderately reduces systolic blood pressure, but not diastolic blood pressure, when compared with a paraffin control. Heart rate and anxiety were reduced by a small amount the day following the completion of lemon aromatherapy (103455).
• Nausea and vomiting. It is unclear if aromatherapy with lemon oil is beneficial in palliative care patients with nausea and vomiting. Details: A small observational study in hospitalized palliative care patients with advanced cancer has found that administering aromatherapy with lemon oil pads relieves nausea and vomiting in 73% of applications (110778). The interpretation of these findings is limited by the use of a retrospective chart review and the lack of a comparator group.
• Obesity. Although there is interest in using lemon orally for obesity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lemon for this condition.
• Oral mucositis. Lemon has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A randomized, controlled trial in patients with head and neck cancer receiving external beam radiotherapy 5 days weekly shows that using a 2:1 oral honey-lemon throat spray four to eight times daily, beginning 1 day prior to radiotherapy initiation and continuing for 5 weeks, does not improve severity of mucositis when compared with oral benzydamine hydrochloride throat spray applied four to eight times daily. The actual rate of oral mucositis occurrence is 65% in those receiving the honey-lemon spray, compared with 35% with the benzydamine hydrochloride spray; however, this difference was not statistically significant (107487). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. Also, the validity of these findings is limited due to the lack of objective outcome measures.
• Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). It is unclear if aromatherapy with lemon essential oil is beneficial in patients with PONV. Details: Preliminary research in patients undergoing lower extremity fracture surgery shows that aromatherapy with lemon essential oil started the morning of surgery, then every 2 hours to the end of surgery, in the recovery room, and 16 hours after surgery reduces the frequency, severity, and amount of PONV, and the frequency of anti-emetic drug administration after surgery, when compared with control. The intensity of pain is also reduced, but not the amount of post-operative opioid needed (112956).
• Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. It is unclear if aromatherapy with lemon essential oil is beneficial in patients with nausea and vomiting due to pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study in pregnant patients shows that practicing aromatherapy with 2 drops of lemon essential oil placed on a cotton ball as needed modestly reduces pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting on 2 of 4 days of the study when compared with placebo (93475).
• Radiation-induced sialadenitis. Aromatherapy with lemon essential oil has only been evaluated in combination with other essential oils; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with thyroid cancer shows that receiving 10-minute aromatherapy baths with lemon and ginger essential oils prior to meals for 2 weeks before treatment with radioactive iodine therapy attenuates damage to the salivary gland when compared with distilled water baths (98129).
• Respiratory tract infections. Although there is interest in using lemon orally for respiratory tract infections such as cold and flu, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lemon for these conditions. More evidence is needed to rate lemon for these uses.

(Read more about LEMON)

EFFECTIVE

• Bowel preparation. Various magnesium salts are used for cleansing the bowel prior to procedures such as colonoscopy. Details: Various magnesium salts, including citrate, hydroxide, oxide, and sulfate, are ingredients in bowel preparation products available over-the-counter or by prescription only.
• Constipation. Magnesium salts are effective when used short-term orally to treat constipation and chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC). Details: Magnesium citrate, hydroxide, oxide, and sulfate salts are commonly used as laxatives. Magnesium citrate 11.3-17.45 grams has been used; magnesium hydroxide 2.4-4.8 grams, as 30-60 mL of milk of magnesia, has also been used (113483,113484). Magnesium sulfate, also known as Epsom salt, which seems to have the most potent effect, has been used as 10-30 grams (6430,113485). Magnesium salts should only be used for occasional treatment of constipation, and doses should be taken with a full 8-ounce glass of water. Magnesium oxide seems to be beneficial in adults with CIC when taken short-term. Clinical guidelines published by the American Gastroenterology Association and American College of Gastroenterology in 2023 give a conditional recommendation suggesting the use of magnesium oxide over managing CIC without magnesium oxide based on low-quality studies conducted over 4 weeks. The recommended starting dose is 400-500 mg daily with dose titration per symptom response and side effects (112859). A small clinical study in patients with CIC who are not taking chronic medications shows that taking magnesium oxide 1.5 grams in three divided doses daily for 28 days increases spontaneous bowel movements when compared with placebo (104397). It is unknown if magnesium is beneficial for CIC when used long-term.
• Dyspepsia. Magnesium salts are effective when used orally as antacids. Details: Magnesium carbonate, hydroxide, oxide, or trisilicate salts are used orally as antacids to reduce symptoms of gastric hyperacidity or gastroesophageal reflux. Magnesium hydroxide has the fastest onset of action. The onset for magnesium carbonate is slower due to its crystal structure. Magnesium trisilicate has the slowest onset and longest duration of action due to poor solubility (6844). Doses used include magnesium hydroxide 400-1200 mg (5-15 mL of milk of magnesia) up to four times daily, or magnesium oxide 800 mg daily (15).
• Eclampsia. Magnesium sulfate is considered the drug of choice for control of seizures. Details: Intravenous (IV) and/or intramuscular (IM) magnesium sulfate is considered the agent of choice for seizure prophylaxis during eclampsia by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) (15,12591,12592,61012,61184). Typical doses include 4-6 grams of magnesium sulfate by IV infusion in 250 mL of dextrose 5% or normal saline solution, followed by 4-5 grams of magnesium sulfate IM every 4 hours, or 1-3 grams per hour by continuous IV infusion. Doses should be adjusted according to serum levels and urinary excretion, and should not exceed 30-40 grams of magnesium sulfate daily (15,12591). Meta-analyses of clinical research show that treatment with IV or IM magnesium reduces the risk of seizure recurrence by 33% to 69% when compared with phenytoin, and by 47% to 60% when compared with diazepam (19960,60818,60954,60964,61105). One preliminary clinical study shows that lower doses of IV magnesium sulfate (9 grams loading dose and maintenance of 2.5 grams every 4 hours for 24 hours) are as effective as higher doses (14 grams loading dose and maintenance of 5 grams every 4 hours for 24 hours) for reducing the recurrence of eclamptic seizures (89383). It is generally recommended that treatment be continued for at least 24 hours after the last seizure (15). Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for eclampsia.
• Hypomagnesemia. Hypomagnesemia can be effectively treated with oral or parenteral magnesium. Details: Taking magnesium orally or parenterally is helpful for treating and preventing hypomagnesemia associated with alcoholism, cirrhosis of the liver, congestive heart failure (CHF), severe or prolonged diarrhea or vomiting, kidney dysfunction, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), pancreatitis, malabsorption syndromes, and other conditions (6280,6281,8088,8089). The dose and salt of magnesium for oral replacement therapy should be chosen carefully to avoid causing diarrhea. The gluconate and chloride salts cause less diarrhea, while the oxide salt is more likely to cause diarrhea and should be avoided. Magnesium chloride should also be avoided due to poor solubility which decreases absorption (6430,8099,10664). Orally, magnesium sulfate 3 grams every 6 hours for four doses has been used for hypomagnesemia (15). Parenteral magnesium doses must be individualized according to serum magnesium levels, but a typical starting dose for mild deficiency is 1 gram of magnesium sulfate intramuscularly (IM) every 6 hours for 4 doses (15). For more severe deficiency, 5 grams of magnesium sulfate may be given as an intravenous (IV) infusion in 1 liter of dextrose 5% or normal saline solution over 3 hours (15).
• Pre-eclampsia. Magnesium sulfate is considered the drug of choice for seizure prophylaxis in patients with pre-eclampsia. Details: Intravenous (IV) and/or intramuscular (IM) magnesium sulfate is considered the agent of choice for seizure prophylaxis during pre-eclampsia by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) (12591,12592,61012,61184). Some meta-analyses show that IV administration of magnesium sulfate reduces the risk of eclampsia when compared with placebo, phenytoin, or diazepam in patients with pre-eclampsia (19960,60818,60960,60979). A typical initial dose is 4-5 grams of magnesium sulfate by IV infusion in 250 mL of dextrose 5% or normal saline solution, followed by 4-5 grams of magnesium sulfate IM every 4 hours, or 1-3 grams of magnesium sulfate per hour by continuous IV infusion. Doses should be adjusted according to serum levels and urinary excretion, and should not exceed 30-40 grams of magnesium sulfate daily (15,12591). The optimal duration of prophylaxis has not been determined. A meta-analysis suggests that using a shorter duration of 12 hours or less is not associated with an increase in risk of eclamptic seizures when compared with regimens of 24 hours or longer (108732). However, studies are likely underpowered due to the low incidence of eclampsia. Oral magnesium has been evaluated for the prevention of pre-eclampsia in healthy adults, but taking magnesium citrate 300 mg daily, starting at 12-20 weeks' gestation and continuing until delivery, does not reduce the incidence of pre-eclampsia when compared with placebo (103724).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Cerebral palsy. Most evidence shows that antenatal magnesium reduces the risk of cerebral palsy in preterm infants, although there are some inconsistent results. Details: Most clinical studies and meta-analyses show that antenatal magnesium sulfate reduces the risk of cerebral palsy by about 32% and the risk of motor dysfunction by about 45% in preterm infants (60915,60927,60931,61001,97485,103734,103754,114675,114681). The lowest effective dose of magnesium sulfate seems to be 4 grams intravenously, with or without a maintenance dose of 1 gram/hour until birth or for 24 hours. In obese females, a higher dose, based on body weight, may be needed (97485,97495,103734,103754). However, some studies have inconsistent results (8093,19998,98293,98295,112784). Giving females at risk of imminent preterm birth (prior to 32 weeks), intravenous magnesium sulfate 4.5 grams over 20 minutes followed by 1 gram per hour until birth or for 24 hours, in addition to a standard treatment protocol, does not reduce the incidence of cerebral palsy (112784). Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for this purpose.
• Seizures. Intravenous magnesium sulfate is used for treating seizures of various etiologies. Details: Intravenous magnesium sulfate may be useful for controlling seizures associated with epilepsy, glomerulonephritis, hypothyroidism, and acute nephritis in children (15). Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for this purpose.
• Torsades de pointes. Intravenous magnesium sulfate is the first-line treatment for torsades de pointes after measures to correct precipitating factors have been unsuccessful. Details: Intravenous magnesium sulfate has been used successfully to treat the life-threatening ventricular tachycardia, torsades de pointes (15,6844). The Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines of the American Heart Association recommend a dose of 1 to 2 grams diluted in 50-100 mL Dextrose 5% solution given IV over 5-60 minutes, followed by a continuous IV infusion of 0.5-1 gram/hour.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Arrhythmia. Magnesium sulfate is effective for the specific type of ventricular tachycardia known as torsades de pointes, and seems to be helpful for treating other types of arrhythmias. Evidence for the role of oral or intravenous magnesium in preventing postoperative arrhythmias is conflicting. Details: Administering magnesium intravenously or orally may be helpful for treating atrial and ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, and supraventricular tachycardia (9497,13352,13354,13355,13356,60804,60829,60877,61113,111696). Arrhythmias associated with congestive heart failure have been treated with magnesium sulfate 8 grams infused over 12 hours (9497). For rate control in atrial fibrillation, magnesium sulfate 2.5 grams IV over 20 minutes, followed by 2.5 grams IV over 2 hours has been used (13356). For paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, single doses of 1-4 grams of magnesium chloride have been used (13352). For atrial tachycardia, 2 grams of magnesium sulfate in 10 mL of dextrose 5% solution has been given IV over 1-10 minutes, followed by 5-10 grams of magnesium sulfate in 250-500 mL dextrose 5% solution as an IV infusion over 5 hours (13354,13355). Research on the effects of intravenous magnesium for preventing arrhythmias after cardiac surgery is conflicting. Some meta-analyses show that intravenous magnesium reduces the risk of atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias, or supraventricular arrhythmias following cardiac surgery by 23% to 48% when compared with placebo (60814,60826,60828,60838,61008,61033,61181,97487,97490). Doses of magnesium sulfate used include 30 mg/kg in 500 mL normal saline (97490), or 80-100 mg/kg added to the cardioplegia solution (97487). Also, one small study in adults after CABG surgery suggests that taking magnesium hydroxide 1600 mg orally reduces arrhythmia as effectively as receiving magnesium sulfate 2000 mg intravenously (99315). However, other meta-analyses that only include higher-quality trials show that magnesium supplementation does not reduce the risk of ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmias following cardiac surgery (61010,61024,61031,105081). A meta-analysis of clinical trials of intravenous magnesium for prevention of new-onset atrial fibrillation after non-cardiac surgeries shows that it does not reduce the incidence significantly when compared with placebo (112778). However, there was a high risk of bias in the analysis, and variability in types of surgery, and the salt and dose of magnesium used.
• Asthma. Parenteral magnesium sulfate can help to reverse severe acute asthma attacks and reduce the need for hospital admission. It is unclear if nebulized magnesium is beneficial for acute asthma attacks. However, oral magnesium does not seem to be beneficial. Details: Overall, a single dose of intravenous magnesium seems to improve pulmonary function in acute asthma exacerbation and reduce the risk of hospitalization, particularly in patients with severe asthma, and those who have failed initial treatment with nebulized albuterol and intravenous corticosteroids (60888,90023,96483,104398,107365). The typical dose used for adults is 2 grams of magnesium sulfate infused over 20 minutes (15). For children, 25-75 mg/kg, to a maximum of 2 grams, infused over 20-30 minutes has been used (15,96483,107365). However, a post-hoc analysis of one large clinical trial (104400) designed to assess nebulized magnesium in children with acute asthma has found that adding IV magnesium to nebulized magnesium is associated with greater odds of hospitalization when compared with no IV magnesium (105919). This post-hoc analysis did not differentiate between precautionary and necessary hospitalizations. Although some clinical research and a meta-analysis in patients with acute asthma exacerbation show that nebulized magnesium in combination with standard treatment improves airway function, respiratory rate, and clinical asthma severity when compared with standard treatment alone, it is unclear whether these findings are clinically relevant (90016,113466). Most evidence, including larger clinical trials and meta-analyses, has not shown benefit of adjunct nebulized magnesium for acute asthma in adults or children (60888,90002,96484,104400,105920,113466,114674). Oral magnesium also does not seem to be beneficial. A meta-analysis of small clinical trials in children and adults with asthma shows that taking magnesium supplements orally does not improve lung function or reduce bronchodilator use when compared with control (104404).
• Colorectal cancer. Increasing dietary magnesium intake seems to lower the risk of colon cancer but not rectal cancer. Details: Epidemiological research shows that increased dietary magnesium intake is associated with a reduced risk of colon cancer, but the risk of rectal cancer is not affected (89387,90017,90027,101355).
• Diabetes. Low dietary magnesium may increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, but evidence on the use of supplements for treating type 2 diabetes is conflicting. Details: Higher dietary magnesium intake is associated with lower fasting insulin concentrations and a reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes in adults and obese children (13369,15548,96473,97486,98294,103736,105918,106920). In people with existing type 2 diabetes, hypomagnesemia is found in 25% to 38% of patients, especially in those with poorly controlled diabetes (1172). Population research in adults with type 2 diabetes also shows that a dietary magnesium intake of less than 250 mg daily is associated with a 56% higher risk of mortality. Preliminary subgroup analyses suggest that the risk of mortality is higher in those with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels above 7% (110051). A meta-analysis of small, heterogeneous clinical studies in adults with type 2 diabetes suggests that magnesium may modestly reduce HbA1C in patients with hypomagnesemia, but not in patients with normal magnesium levels, when compared with control (105075). Individual clinical studies using magnesium supplements in patients with type 2 diabetes or insulin resistance have shown mixed results. Some research suggests magnesium supplements can decrease fasting blood glucose and improve insulin sensitivity, as well as reduce the risk of developing diabetes in high-risk patients (10664,12582,13376,60854,99313,106920), but other research shows no effect (1171,1172,13379,13380,112780). Discrepancies in these findings might reflect differences in magnesium salts and doses used, or differences in baseline magnesium status in study subjects.
• Hypercholesterolemia. Magnesium may help improve lipid levels by a small amount in people with this condition. Details: There is some evidence that taking magnesium oxide 1 gram orally daily for 6 weeks can produce small decreases in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol levels, and small increases in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. However, magnesium does not seem to improve lipoprotein (a) levels (1193). Magnesium may also lower triglycerides in people with hypertriglyceridemia (97494).
• Metabolic syndrome. Low dietary and serum levels of magnesium seem to be associated with the development of metabolic syndrome. Details: Higher magnesium intake from diet and supplements is associated with a 27% lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome in healthy females (13371) and a 31% lower risk in healthy young adults (14304). Additional epidemiological research suggests that people with low serum magnesium levels are 6-7 times more likely to have metabolic syndrome than people with normal magnesium levels (13372). In a population analysis of over 6000 individuals without metabolic syndrome at baseline, the risk of developing this condition over a 6-year follow-up period was reduced by 16% in the highest quintile of dietary magnesium intake (median intake 371 mg daily) when compared with the lowest quintile (median intake 203 mg daily). Some, but not all, research suggests that the hazard ratio for metabolic syndrome in relation to magnesium intake may be U-shaped, with higher risk at intakes below about 150 mg daily and above 600 mg daily (108963). A combination of magnesium 20 mEq daily and potassium 40 mEq daily (magnesium potassium citrate) taken orally for 16 weeks reverses metabolic side effects of chlorthalidone, such as increased fasting plasma glucose and hypokalemia, more effectively than potassium chloride 40 mEq daily alone (112932).
• Osteoporosis. Increased dietary and supplemental magnesium intake seems to increase bone mineral density and decrease bone loss in postmenopausal patients. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking magnesium hydroxide orally, 300-1800 mg daily for 6 months, then 600 mg daily for 18 months, or magnesium citrate orally 1830 mg daily for 30 days, might reduce bone loss and bone turnover in postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis (9104,60928). Some epidemiological research also suggests that magnesium intake is related to increased bone mineral density (12501,12502,12503,12504,90014), although not all studies have found an association (12505,98286).
• Postoperative pain. Injectable magnesium has been used with promising results for reducing pain and the need for other analgesics postoperatively. Details: A meta-analysis of 25 clinical trials shows that intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate, 5-50 mg/kg bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 6 mg/kg or 500 mg hourly during surgery, seems to reduce the 24-hour postoperative use of IV morphine by 24% when compared with placebo (19968). Adding IV magnesium sulfate 3.7-5.5 grams to patient-controlled analgesia for 24 hours after surgery has also been used (19968). Additionally, meta-analyses support that adjunctive IV or intrathecal administration of magnesium reduces post-operative pain scores, improves pain relief and sensory nerve block, and decreases the need for other analgesics, when compared with control (89390,90012,90015,98287,103728,114676,114677,114678). However, some data are conflicting. In a meta-analysis of 7 trials, IV magnesium was not associated with lower pain scores over the first 48 hours postoperatively. The reasons for these discrepant findings are unclear but may be explained by differences in magnesium regimens, anesthesia protocols, and surgical populations studied. Additionally, IV magnesium appears to be less effective than dexmedetomidine (105082). Two moderate-sized clinical studies in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in China show that adding magnesium sulfate 2.5 mg/mL to the periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) cocktail or administering IV magnesium sulfate 40 mg/kg before anesthesia induction then as a 15 mg/kg infusion during surgery reduces pain scores, increases comfort levels, limits and delays the use of postoperative opioids, prolongs analgesia, and reduces markers of inflammation when compared with the usual PIA cocktail or control (111181,113677). Administering magnesium intravenously also seems to be helpful for pain control after hysterectomy. A 3-gram IV bolus of magnesium sulfate followed by an infusion of 0.5 grams per hour for 20 hours has been used. Lower doses were not effective (6848). In males undergoing laparoscopic radical resection for gastrointestinal cancer, administering IV magnesium intraoperatively, as a loading dose of 40 mg/kg followed by 15 mg/kg/hour through the end of surgery, reduces postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort and analgesic requirements, when compared with placebo (112783). However, IV magnesium might not alleviate postoperative pain in children. Two small clinical studies show that administering a magnesium IV infusion does not reduce pain when compared with saline in children after tonsillectomy or after elective strabismus surgery (98282,105077).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Taking magnesium orally seems to relieve symptoms of PMS. Details: There is some evidence that magnesium supplementation can improve symptoms, including mood changes and fluid retention, in some patients with PMS (1187,1188,6847). Doses used include magnesium oxide 333 mg daily for 2 menstrual cycles, or magnesium pyrrolidone carboxylic acid equivalent to 360 mg elemental magnesium three times daily, from the 15th day of the menstrual cycle until onset of menstrual flow (1187,1188). Taking magnesium orally in a dose of 360 mg (elemental magnesium) three times daily for 2 months seems to prevent premenstrual migraine (1186,6847). A combination of magnesium 200 mg daily plus vitamin B6 50 mg daily seems to reduce anxiety-related premenstrual symptoms, including nervous tension, mood swings, irritability, and anxiety, when compared with placebo (8555).
• Vasospastic angina. Intravenous magnesium seems to prevent coronary spasm in patients with this condition. Details: Clinical research shows that administration of intravenous magnesium sulfate 65 mg/kg infused over 20 minutes dilates coronary arteries and suppresses acetylcholine-induced coronary spasms when compared with infusion of a dextrose solution in patients with vasospastic angina (8091).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Altitude sickness. Taking magnesium citrate orally does not seem to reduce acute altitude sickness risk. Details: Clinical research shows that taking magnesium citrate 1200 mg daily orally in three divided doses, beginning 3 days prior to mountain ascent and continuing until mountain descent, does not reduce the risk of acute altitude sickness when compared with placebo (60801).
• Athletic performance. Taking magnesium orally does not seem to improve energy or endurance during athletic activity. Details: Most evidence suggests that taking magnesium orally doesn't increase energy and endurance during athletic activity. Magnesium oxide, aspartate, and orotate salts do not seem to improve exercise performance when used alone or in combination with potassium, vitamin B6, or zinc (2825,2826,2828,2829,2830,60751,113655).
• Bronchiolitis. Intravenous or nebulized magnesium is not beneficial in infants with this condition. Details: Clinical research shows that administering a single IV dose of magnesium sulfate 100 mg/kg to infants with acute bronchiolitis does not improve, and may actually worsen, symptoms when compared with placebo (97482). A clinical study in infants with moderate to severe bronchiolitis shows that adding nebulized magnesium sulfate 40 mg/kg to nebulized epinephrine does not reduce hospital stay or the need for ventilator or oxygen support when compared with epinephrine alone (99317). Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for this use.
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Research on the effects of intravenous infusions of magnesium and calcium for preventing oxaliplatin neurotoxicity are inconsistent, but higher quality studies seem to show no benefit. Details: Pooled analyses of cohort studies and clinical trials show that calcium and magnesium infusions can decrease the incidence of severe oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). However, when only clinical trials are considered, the infusions do not appear to be helpful (90005,90029,90031,96474,96479).
• Complex regional pain syndrome. Intravenous magnesium is not beneficial in complex regional pain syndrome type 1. Details: Clinical research shows that receiving magnesium sulfate 70 mg/kg intravenously at the rate of 25 mL/hour for 4 hours each day for 5 days does not improve pain or level of impairment when compared with placebo in patients with chronic complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (89395).
• Emergence delirium. The majority of small clinical studies in adults and children undergoing various surgeries suggest that intravenous (IV) magnesium doesn't reduce the risk of emergence delirium. However, most clinical studies in adults suggest that IV magnesium reduces emergence agitation. Details: A small clinical study in adults undergoing surgery for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair shows that administering IV magnesium 30 mg/kg as a loading dose, followed by a 10 mg/kg/hour infusion for the duration of surgery, does not improve agitation or delirium scores when compared with administering saline (111182). Similarly, a small clinical study in children ages 2-5 years undergoing elective strabismus surgery shows that administering IV magnesium during anesthesia does not seem to prevent the occurrence of emergence delirium when compared with administering saline (105077). In a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials in children aged 2-16 years undergoing general anesthesia for oral or ophthalmic surgery, giving IV magnesium as a 30 mg/kg loading dose followed by a 10 mg/kg/hour infusion, or as a single dose of 15-30 mg/kg, does not reduce emergence delirium scores, and may actually prolong emergence times (108729). However, there is some conflicting evidence. In patients undergoing radical mastectomy, giving intraoperative magnesium sulfate 30mg/kg over 1 hour, followed by 10 mg/kg/hour until the end of surgery, reduces emergence agitation (odds ratio 0.26) when compared with placebo (112781).
• Menopausal symptoms. Oral magnesium oxide does not seem to be beneficial for menopausal hot flashes. Details: A small, low quality study in postmenopausal patients with a history of breast cancer shows that taking magnesium oxide 400-800 mg orally daily reduces hot flashes when compared with baseline (102454). However, a larger, higher quality clinical study using magnesium oxide 800-1200 mg daily did not show any benefit when compared with placebo (98290).
• Muscle cramps. Oral magnesium does not seem to improve muscle cramp frequency or intensity. Details: Meta-analyses of small clinical trials show that magnesium supplementation for 3-6 weeks does not decrease the frequency or intensity of skeletal muscle cramps, whether the cramps are idiopathic or due to liver cirrhosis or pregnancy, when compared with placebo (90022,104395).
• Sickle cell disease. Intravenous magnesium does not add any benefit to standard therapy for sickle cell disease in children. Details: Clinical research shows that giving magnesium sulfate 40-100 mg/kg (maximum of 2 grams per dose) intravenously every hour for 6-8 doses as an adjunct to standard therapy does not decrease hospital stay, pain, or opioid use, or improve quality of life, when compared with standard therapy and placebo in children with sickle cell disease (89399,98283,101356). Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for this purpose.
• Stillbirth. Magnesium administered during pregnancy does not reduce stillbirth risk. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that magnesium supplementation does not significantly decrease the risk of stillbirths when administered during pregnancy (60925,60978).
• Tetanus. Intravenous magnesium sulfate does not seem to improve outcomes in patients with this condition. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous magnesium sulfate does not reduce mortality when compared with placebo or diazepam in patients with tetanus (61020). While some research shows that magnesium reduces the duration of hospitalization and the need for ventilation when compared with diazepam (61170), magnesium does not seem to improve these outcomes when compared with placebo (60860).
• Traumatic brain injury (TBI). Magnesium does not improve clinical outcomes in patients with moderate to severe TBI. Its effect in patients with concussions is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of four clinical trials shows that treatment with magnesium does not significantly improve neurological outcomes or reduce the risk of mortality when compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe TBI (60905). A small observational cohort study in adolescents with concussions has found that adding oral magnesium 400 mg twice daily for 5 days to standard treatment with acetaminophen and ondansetron is associated with a trend toward reduced symptom severity when compared with standard treatment alone (104401). The validity of this study is limited by its observational nature and small cohort size.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. Intravenous magnesium does not seem to help reduce symptoms of alcohol withdrawal but may reduce the duration of alcoholic delirium. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that administration of four intramuscular injections of magnesium sulfate 2 grams at 6-hour intervals does not reduce symptoms of alcohol withdrawal when compared with saline (61063). A small observational study in patients with alcoholic delirium has found that administering magnesium sulfate IV 50 mg/kg every 8 hours, in addition to usual sedation, is associated with a reduction of delirium by approximately 2 days, or 4 days when given every 12 hours in addition to dexmedetomidine, when compared with usual sedation alone (111180). However, half of patients had hypomagnesemia at baseline; it is unclear if effects would be similar for patients with normal magnesium levels. Oral magnesium has not been evaluated for this purpose.
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there has been interest in using oral magnesium for allergic rhinitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of magnesium for this purpose.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial in children with ADHD. Details: Children with ADHD seem to have lower magnesium levels in their blood and hair (9969,100262,100263). A small clinical study in children aged 7-12 years with ADHD and magnesium deficiency shows that taking magnesium aspartate and lactate 6 mg/kg daily for 6 months might improve hyperactivity and magnesium levels when compared with control (1189). Another small clinical study in children with ADHD but without magnesium deficiency shows that taking magnesium 6 mg/kg daily along with vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks may modestly improve emotional problems, but not inattention or hyperactivity, as measured on the strength and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ), when compared with placebo (105914).
• Back pain. It is unclear if oral or intravenous magnesium is beneficial for acute or chronic back pain in adults. Details: One open-label clinical study in adults with acute low-back pain shows that taking magnesium 365 mg once daily in addition to taking etodolac 400 mg twice daily for 10 days does not further reduce pain when compared with taking etodolac alone (105913). Magnesium has also been tried for chronic back pain. A small clinical study in patients with chronic low-back pain shows that receiving magnesium sulfate 1 gram in 250 mL normal saline intravenously every 4 hours for 2 weeks, followed by magnesium gluconate 100 mg and magnesium oxide 400 mg by mouth daily for 4 weeks, reduces pain severity when compared with placebo (90035). It is unclear if oral magnesium used alone is beneficial.
• Bariatric surgery complications. It is unclear if oral magnesium supplementation improves metabolic parameters after bariatric surgery. Details: A retrospective study of over 3000 post-bariatric surgery patients suggests that those who take oral magnesium supplements providing 100-450 mg elemental magnesium daily may have improved metabolic parameters over 4 years of follow-up. When patients taking magnesium supplements were compared with those not taking supplements, 11% and 18% had type 2 diabetes, respectively, 30% and 42% had hypertension, respectively, and 16% and 23% had elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, respectively. For patients with hypomagnesemia at baseline, supplementation seemed to result in greater benefits (108968).
• Bipolar disorder. Taking magnesium orally might improve manic symptoms in some people with bipolar disorder; however, it is unclear how it compares to current standard of care. Details: One preliminary clinical study shows that magnesium 40 mEq daily (Magnesiocard) for 32 weeks has similar effects to lithium in up to 50% of patients treated for rapid cycling bipolar affective disorder (61022). Another preliminary clinical study shows that magnesium oxide 375 mg orally daily plus verapamil 80 mg taken four times daily reduces manic symptoms more effectively than verapamil alone in patients with mania (60742).
• Cancer-related neuropathic pain. It is unclear if intravenous magnesium is beneficial for this condition. Details: Single 500 mg to 1 gram doses of magnesium sulfate seem to relieve neuropathic pain for up to four hours when compared to baseline (6846). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Chemotherapy-induced leukopenia. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial in pediatric patients at risk for cisplatin-induced febrile neutropenia. Details: A small clinical study in children with solid tumors aged 9 years and older shows that taking magnesium 250 mg daily while receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy reduces febrile neutropenia by 47% and septic shock by 57% when compared with not receiving magnesium. Results from this study suggest that four pediatric patients need to take oral magnesium to avoid one case of febrile neutropenia (104394).
• Cardiac arrest. Intravenous magnesium does not seem to be helpful in cardiac arrest; however, the risk of sudden cardiac death seems to be inversely correlated to higher plasma magnesium levels or dietary intake. It is unclear if magnesium supplementation is associated with similar risk reduction. Details: Administering magnesium intravenously doesn't seem to improve successful resuscitation in people with cardiac arrest (1190). However, higher plasma magnesium levels and higher dietary magnesium intake might reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death, possibly by protecting against fatal ventricular arrhythmias. In the Nurses' Health Study, the risk of sudden cardiac death was 77% lower in females with the highest quartile of plasma magnesium levels when compared with the lowest quartile. Also, the risk was 37% lower in females with the highest quartile of dietary magnesium intake when compared with the lowest quartile (17132).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Evidence regarding the effect of dietary magnesium on CVD risk is conflicting. Details: Epidemiological research in some populations shows that increased dietary magnesium intake is associated with decreased mortality due to strokes, coronary heart disease, ischemic heart disease, and heart failure, but other epidemiological research does not show any effect on these risks (89391,90003,90009,90030,90036,103735). Reasons for the discrepancies may be related to serum levels of magnesium at baseline, risk of cardiovascular disease at baseline, use of concomitant medications such as diuretics, or the presence of concomitant conditions such as kidney dysfunction. A population analysis conducted in Denmark has found that magnesium intake from drinking water may be associated with cardiovascular mortality. The overall risk of cardiovascular death and death due to stroke was reduced by 4% in the lowest 3 quintiles of intake when compared with the highest quintile. However, the risk of death due to acute myocardial infarction was increased by 22% in the lowest quintile when compared with the highest (108726). The relevance of these results is unclear, given that the main dietary source of magnesium is food rather than drinking water.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Limited evidence suggests that magnesium may help improve CFS symptoms, but this is controversial. Details: In people with low red blood cell magnesium, there is some evidence that intramuscular injections of 1 gram magnesium sulfate given once weekly for 6 weeks might improve CFS symptoms (7556). However, there is additional evidence that most patients with CFS have normal magnesium stores, and measurement of red cell magnesium is a poor indicator of total magnesium stores (7557,8084,8085,8086,8087).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Intravenous, but not nebulized, magnesium may be helpful in acute exacerbations of COPD. Details: Administering magnesium sulfate intravenously, 1.2-2.5 grams over 20 minutes, might be helpful for treating acute exacerbations of COPD (1208,6844,103733). Also, giving magnesium sulfate 2 grams intravenously seems to improve exercise capacity when compared with placebo (89384). A meta-analysis of studies using intravenous magnesium sulfate for COPD exacerbations shows that it reduces hospital admission and mean length of stay and improves dyspnea scores when compared with placebo. Based on the relative risk identified in the included studies, seven patients would need to receive intravenous magnesium to prevent one hospitalization. However, intravenous magnesium sulfate does not change the need for non-invasive ventilation and the available research did not evaluate intensive care unit (ICU) admission (108967). Nebulized magnesium has also been evaluated. In patients experiencing a COPD exacerbation, clinical research shows that administering nebulized magnesium sulfate with albuterol three times at 30-minute intervals does not improve pulmonary function as measured by the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) when compared with placebo (89393). Also, a meta-analysis of a small number of low-quality studies shows that nebulized magnesium does not reduce hospital admission or the need for ventilatory support, although it might modestly improve dyspnea scores and reduce ICU admissions, when compared with placebo (108967).
• Cluster headache. It is unclear if a single intravenous dose of magnesium sulfate is beneficial for cluster headaches. Details: Administering magnesium sulfate intravenously, 1 gram over 5 minutes, seems to improve cluster headaches when compared with baseline(1184). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Cognitive impairment. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for cognitive impairment. Details: A large observational study in adults with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis suggests that serum magnesium levels of 20.2-22.3 mg/dL are associated with the lowest odds of mild cognitive impairment, while serum magnesium levels below and above that range of values are associated with increased odds of mild cognitive impairment (111695).
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). It is unclear if magnesium supplementation is beneficial for CHD. Details: Clinical research shows that magnesium oxide 800-1200 mg daily for 3 months reduces platelet-dependent thrombosis by 35% when compared with placebo in patients with CHD (60759). It is unclear if this effect improves clinical outcomes. The effect of magnesium supplementation on coronary artery calcium has also been studied. A meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies in 196 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) shows that taking magnesium or increasing the concentration of magnesium in dialysate does not improve coronary artery calcification (CAC) scores when compared with standard therapy. However, magnesium reduced carotid intima-media thickness (111179). Similarly, a large clinical study in patients with CKD shows that taking slow-release magnesium hydroxide (Mablet, Denmark) 360 mg twice daily for 12 months does not slow the progression of CAC scores when compared with placebo (111178). This study may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for COVID-19. Details: A small clinical study in patients hospitalized with moderate COVID-19 shows that taking magnesium 300 mg daily for the duration of hospitalization reduces the number of patients requiring oxygen therapy but not the duration of hospital stay when compared with placebo (114680).
• Depression. It is unclear if magnesium is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of depression in adults. Details: Some population research shows that dietary intake of elemental magnesium between 76-360 mg daily is associated with a reduced risk of depression, but there was no association with greater amounts of magnesium, and other population research shows no association at any intake level (96480,98289). For treatment of mild to moderate depression, one preliminary clinical study shows that taking magnesium chloride 2 grams orally daily for 6 weeks reduces depression scores by 56% and anxiety scores by about 52% when compared to baseline (96477). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group. However, a small clinical study in adults with recurrent depression shows that taking magnesium aspartate 120 mg daily for 8 weeks, along with fluoxetine, does not improve depression scores when compared with patients taking fluoxetine and placebo (111185). Similarly, a very small crossover clinical study in adults with mild or moderate treatment-resistant depression shows that administering a single dose of IV magnesium sulfate 4 grams does not improve depression scores when compared with an infusion of 5% dextrose (96481). However, scores were evaluated 24 hours post-infusion which may be too soon to detect improvement. Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that elemental magnesium in doses of 100-400 mg is not recommended for adjunctive or monotherapy use in patients with depression (110318).
• Diabetic foot ulcers. Oral magnesium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with grade 3 diabetic foot ulcers shows that taking magnesium oxide 250 mg plus vitamin E 400 IU daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces ulcer size when compared with placebo (101436). It is unclear if this effect is due to magnesium, vitamin E, or the combination.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral magnesium reduces muscle soreness in adults after resistance training. Details: A very small study in healthy adults, ages 19-23, shows that taking magnesium glycinate 350 mg daily for 10 days seems to reduce muscle soreness after bench press exercise when compared with placebo (104399).
• Fetal and premature infant mortality. It is unclear if antenatal intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate administration reduces the risk of fetal and premature infant mortality. Details: Two meta-analyses of up to 7 clinical studies in patients at risk of preterm birth shows that antenatal IV magnesium sulfate administration does not reduce the risk of fetal or neonatal death when compared with placebo (114675,114681).
• Fibromyalgia. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for this condition. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking magnesium chloride orally 100 mg once daily for one month reduces mild to moderate, but not severe, stress associated with fibromyalgia when compared with placebo. It also reduces pain levels, but not to a clinically significant extent, and it does not affect sleep, fatigue, or quality of life (108964). Another small clinical study shows that taking magnesium citrate 300 mg daily for 8 weeks improves some symptoms of fibromyalgia, such as number of tender points and depression, when compared to baseline (89385). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. A small clinical study shows that taking a combination of magnesium hydroxide and malic acid (Super Malic tablets) orally decreases fibromyalgia-related pain and tenderness in some patients when compared with placebo (3262). It is unclear if this effect is due to magnesium, malic acid, or the combination.
• Fractures. Population research suggests that higher intakes of magnesium may reduce fracture risk. Details: Observational research has found that higher dietary and supplemental magnesium intake is associated with a 34% lower odds of fracture when compared with lower magnesium intake (101395).
• Gastric cancer. Population research suggests that higher intakes of magnesium may reduce gastric cancer risk. Details: Observational research has found that higher dietary and supplemental magnesium intake is not associated with a reduced risk for gastric cancer when compared with lower intake (103730).
• Hearing loss. Oral magnesium may prevent and improve hearing loss due to environmental factors or loud noises. Details: Clinical research in healthy military recruits shows that taking magnesium aspartate 167 mg daily for 2 months prevents hearing loss from exposure to loud noises during basic military training when compared with placebo (1205). Also, in patients with acute-onset hearing loss that was not caused by environmental factors, taking magnesium aspartate 167 mg daily for 8 weeks seems to improve hearing loss when compared with placebo (60813).
• Hypertension. Oral magnesium supplementation may modestly reduce blood pressure, although these changes are not likely to be considered clinically significant. Details: Most research shows that taking oral magnesium supplements in daily doses that are at least as high as the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for adults and up to 1000 mg daily can lower diastolic blood pressure by about 2 mmHg in adults with or without hypertension (1192,1199,9465,15165,18111,96482). Significantly lower doses do not seem to have this effect (1180,1195,1197,8098). The effect of magnesium on systolic blood pressure is conflicting. One meta-analysis shows that taking magnesium 240-970 mg daily does not lower systolic blood pressure (15165). However, more recent meta-analyses show that taking magnesium 120-970 mg daily can lower systolic blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner by about 2-4 mmHg in patients with or without hypertension (18111,96482). In 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that inconsistent and inconclusive evidence suggests that diets with adequate magnesium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure. Products bearing this claim must provide at least 84 mg of magnesium daily, but no more than 350 mg daily (107451).
• Hypokalemia. It is unclear if intravenous or oral magnesium is beneficial for hypokalemia in patients with normal magnesium levels. Details: A preliminary retrospective observational study in patients with hypokalemia and unknown serum magnesium levels has found that administering oral or intravenous magnesium is not associated with improved time to normalization of serum potassium levels when compared with no magnesium treatment (110049). However, hypokalemia with concurrent hypomagnesemia can impede potassium repletion and exacerbate hypokalemia-induced rhythm disturbances. Standard of care in patients with hypokalemia and known hypomagnesemia includes prompt treatment with magnesium (110063).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for prediabetes. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with prediabetes shows that taking magnesium oxide 250 mg orally daily for 12 weeks does not improve fasting blood glucose levels, insulin resistance, or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels when compared with placebo. Taking magnesium also did not affect blood pressure, body weight, triglyceride levels, or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels; however, it did modestly improve high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (110053).
• Insomnia. Oral magnesium may modestly improve sleep complaints in adults, but evidence is conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of two small clinical studies in healthy older adults with or without insomnia suggests that taking magnesium reduces the time to fall asleep by an average of 17 minutes when compared with placebo (105917). However, it does not increase the time spent asleep. Also, these findings are limited by imprecision and a high risk of bias. Studies included in the analysis used elemental magnesium 500-729 mg daily (as magnesium oxide) for up to 8 weeks (102458,105917). Another small clinical study in patients with poor sleep quality and low magnesium status shows that taking elemental magnesium 320 mg (as magnesium citrate) in divided doses daily for 7 weeks does not improve sleep quality, as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), when compared with a sodium citrate placebo (102456). Magnesium has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A very small crossover clinical study in patients aged 18-40 years without a sleep disorder shows that taking a combination of magnesium 300 mg, L-tryptophan 1000 mg, glycine 3000 mg, tart cherry 220 mg, and theanine 200 mg for 3 days reduces the time to fall asleep by about 24 minutes, increases total time asleep by about 22 minutes, and improves sleep efficiency, but does not improve the total time in bed or wakefulness after falling asleep when compared with cellulose placebo (111184). Another small crossover clinical study in adults with sleep disturbances shows that taking a combination of magnesium 200 mg and melatonin nightly for 4 weeks improves sleep quality, as measured by the PSQI, reduces the length of time it takes to fall asleep by about 17 minutes, and improves some other measures of sleep, such as sleep efficiency and number of awakenings, when compared with placebo. However, despite these improvements, overall sleep quality was still categorized as poor after the intervention (113670). It is unclear if these effects are due to magnesium, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Intraventricular hemorrhage. It is unclear if antenatal intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate can reduce the risk for intraventricular hemorrhage in neonates. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in premature infants shows that if the mother received antenatal intravenous magnesium sulfate, the infant had a non-significant trend toward a reduced risk of intraventricular hemorrhage when compared with infants whose mothers received placebo (103727). This analysis may have been insufficiently powered to detect a difference between groups. Another meta-analysis of up to 6 clinical studies, some of which are included in the previously referenced meta-analysis, in patients at risk of preterm birth shows that maternal antenatal (IV) magnesium sulfate administration does not reduce the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage, but does reduce the risk of severe intraventricular hemorrhage by about 24% when compared with placebo (114681).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Taking magnesium orally may prevent the recurrence of kidney stones, although evidence is conflicting. Details: Prophylactic treatment with magnesium hydroxide, 200 mg twice daily for one year, followed by 500 mg daily for another year, might decrease the recurrence rate of calcium stone formation (2007). However, magnesium oxide does not seem to benefit patients considered to be recurrent calcium stone formers when compared with placebo, no treatment, or chlorthalidone (8097,38501,61199). Magnesium oxide 300 mg in combination with vitamin B6 10 mg daily seems to decrease urinary oxalate levels in people with hyperoxaluria who have previously had kidney stones (1201), but it is unclear if this effect translates into a reduced incidence of kidney stones.
• Liver cancer. Increased dietary magnesium intake is linked with a lower risk of liver cancer. Details: Observational research in retired older Americans has found that higher dietary magnesium intake is associated with a 35% lower risk of liver cancer when compared with lower intake. This association was especially strong in persons who were moderate or heavy alcohol users (105080).
• Lung cancer. Supplemental or dietary magnesium intake does not seem to reduce the risk of lung cancer. Details: A large epidemiological cancer screening trial with a mean follow-up of over 12 years suggests there is no association between dietary or supplemental magnesium intake and the risk of lung cancer. However, dietary magnesium seems to play an important yet unclear role in lung cancer prevention when taken as part of the diet with alpha-carotene, vitamin C, vitamin E, lycopene, selenium, lutein, and zeaxanthin (112096).
• Migraine headache. Oral magnesium may help prevent migraine in some adults and children. Also, intravenous magnesium may help treat migraine in adults, but evidence is conflicting. Details: Small clinical studies in adults with migraine suggest that taking oral high-dose magnesium citrate 600-1830 mg daily in divided doses for up to 3 months seems to modestly reduce the frequency and severity of headaches when compared with baseline or placebo (4891,9498,60902). Limited evidence suggests that adding oral magnesium to conventional treatment may also be beneficial. A clinical study in adults with migraine living in Iran shows that taking magnesium oxide 250 mg twice daily in addition to sodium valproate 200 mg twice daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces severity and duration of migraine, but not migraine frequency, when compared with taking sodium valproate alone (105915). It is unclear if these improvements would be considered clinically significant. In contrast, one small clinical study shows that taking magnesium does not reduce migraine frequency and severity by at least 50% in adults when compared with placebo (10661). For treatment of migraine, some adults with normal magnesium levels respond to intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate 1 gram over 5 minutes, but most patients who benefit have low magnesium levels at baseline (1185,6844). Effects of IV magnesium in patients with unknown magnesium levels are conflicting. Some preliminary clinical research shows that magnesium 1-2 grams IV alleviates acute migraine for up to 2 hours, but other research has found no benefit (89388,97493,98285). In children, treatment with magnesium oxide orally 15 mg/kg daily in 3 divided doses for up to 16 weeks reduces the frequency and severity of migraine headaches when compared with placebo (10663). However, adding magnesium sulfate 400 mg orally daily to ibuprofen or acetaminophen does not further reduce migraine severity in children (89396).
• Miscarriage. Oral magnesium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in pregnant adults with threatened miscarriage between the 6th and 13th week of gestation shows that taking a specific combination product (DAV HA, Lo.Li pharma s.r.l) containing magnesium 450 mg, alpha-lipoic acid, hyaluronic acidvitamin B6, and vitamin D daily in combination with conventional treatment of vaginal progesterone over 2 weeks of observation results in a faster resorption of the subchorionic hematoma and faster decrease of patient-reported vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, and uterine contractions when compared with vaginal progesterone alone (113893). It is unclear if these effects are due to magnesium, other ingredients, or the combination. Additionally, the validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a placebo in the control group.
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Research on the effects of intravenous or oral magnesium after myocardial infarction are conflicting. Details: Administering magnesium intravenously doesn't seem to reduce mortality after an acute MI (8999,13357,13358,13359,13360,19990,60872,61082), although there is some conflicting evidence from a meta-analysis of clinical research that shows that intravenous magnesium sulfate may reduce short-term mortality by 55% when compared with placebo (60795,60895). Clinical research with oral magnesium supplementation has found no benefit (1198,6844).
• Neonatal encephalopathy. Intravenous magnesium may improve short-term outcomes in neonates with encephalopathy. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous magnesium may improve short term outcomes of neonatal encephalopathy (hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, HIE). However, long term outcomes are not affected (90025).
• Nocturnal leg cramps. It is unclear if oral magnesium is helpful for nocturnal leg cramps. Details: Some clinical research in adults with nocturnal leg cramps shows that taking magnesium oxide 865 mg daily at bedtime for 4 weeks does not reduce the frequency of leg cramping episodes when compared with placebo (96478). However, four weeks may be too short a time to see a benefit. In other clinical research, taking oral magnesium oxide monohydrate 226mg daily at bedtime for 60 days reduces the frequency of leg cramps when compared with placebo. This reduction was not seen after 30 days. Magnesium also reduced cramp duration and improved sleep quality, but did not affect pain scores, at 60 days when compared with placebo (106919).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Oral magnesium hydroxide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults with NAFLD shows that taking magnesium hydroxide 150 mg and L-carnitine 2000 mg daily for 16 weeks does not improve liver stiffness scores when compared with baseline or controls who took placebo for 8 weeks followed by this magnesium and L- carnitine combination for 8 weeks. Taking magnesium and L-carnitine also did not improve levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) when compared to baseline (111177).
• Obesity. Evidence on the use of magnesium for weight loss in obese patients is conflicting; any benefit is likely small at best. Details: A meta-analysis of 7 clinical studies in obese patients shows that taking magnesium reduces body mass index (BMI) by 0.3 when compared with control (103723). Another meta-analysis of 7 studies in obese patients shows that while magnesium supplementation does not reduce weight, it reduces waist circumference by 2 cm when compared with placebo (103729). Interestingly, subgroup analyses did not find that the dose of magnesium or baseline magnesium levels impacted effectiveness. One subgroup analysis found that magnesium supplementation lasting 12 weeks or less seemed to be more beneficial for obesity than supplementation lasting longer than 12 weeks (103723).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if oral or IV magnesium reduces the risk of overall mortality. Details: A meta-analysis of heterogeneous observational studies has found that increased dietary magnesium intake, but not supplemental magnesium intake, is associated with a modestly reduced risk of overall mortality (105073). A meta-analysis of 3 small, low-quality clinical studies in ICU patients shows that administering IV magnesium 24-30 mmol or as a target-directed dose for 3 days reduces overall mortality when compared with patients who did not receive magnesium (111290). However, some studies included patients with hypomagnesemia; it is unclear if effects would be similar for patients with normal levels of magnesium.
• Osteoarthritis. Population research has not found a link between magnesium intake and osteoarthritis risk. Details: Observational research has found that dietary and supplemental magnesium intake is not associated with the risk of developing osteoarthritis (101395).
• Pain (acute). It is unclear if intravenous magnesium is helpful for acute pain associated with kidney dysfunction. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with renal colic shows that intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate, 50 mg/kg infused over 20 minutes, is as effective as IV morphine sulfate 0.1 mg/kg for controlling acute renal pain at 20 minutes after the dose (107367).
• Pain (chronic). Population research suggests that higher intakes of magnesium may modestly reduce the risk for chronic pain. Details: A cross-sectional observational study has found that increased magnesium intake is associated with a 7% to 8% reduced risk for chronic pain. The association was found to be stronger in females than in males (103732).
• Perioperative anxiety. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for perioperative anxiety. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing open heart surgery shows that taking magnesium oxide 250 mg orally twice daily during hospitalization moderately improves anxiety and depression scores when compared with no magnesium therapy. Magnesium therapy was held for the 2 days immediately following surgery (110054).
• Physical performance. Oral magnesium may modestly improve physical performance in otherwise healthy, elderly females. Details: Clinical research in otherwise healthy elderly females shows that taking a magnesium oxide supplement (Easymag, Sanofi-Aventis) 900 mg daily for 12 weeks modestly improves walking speed and chair stand speed in elderly females when compared with no treatment (90026).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for improving metabolic indices in patients with PCOS. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with PCOS show that taking magnesium oxide orally, 250 mg daily for 8 weeks, does not affect insulin resistance, beta-cell function, lipid levels, or insulin sensitivity when compared with placebo (103725,105887). Other clinical research in patients with PCOS shows that taking magnesium oxide orally, 250 mg daily for 10 weeks, improves subjective measures of quality of life, fatigue, and emotional functioning, but not objective measures such as alopecia, abnormal uterine bleeding, or acne, when compared with placebo (108965). A clinical study using a combination of magnesium 250 mg with vitamin E 400 mg daily for 12 weeks shows a modest reduction in insulin resistance, insulin levels, and triglyceride levels, but not other lipid levels, when compared with placebo (100264). It is unclear if these beneficial effects are due to magnesium, vitamin E, or the combination.
• Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). It is unclear if intravenous (IV) magnesium is beneficial for PONV due to mixed results from clinical research. Details: A meta-analysis of 5 clinical studies in adults undergoing surgery with general anesthesia shows that administering IV magnesium sulfate intraoperatively reduces PONV (114676). However, a meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies in adults undergoing surgery with general anesthesia shows that administering IV magnesium perioperatively does not reduce the incidence of PONV (114678). A moderate-sized clinical study conducted in China in older adults undergoing total knee arthroplasty shows that administering intravenous magnesium sulfate 40 mg/kg prior to anesthesia induction then 15 mg/kg during surgery reduces the incidence of postoperative vomiting but not postoperative nausea when compared with control (113677). The reasons for these discrepant findings are unclear but may be explained by differences in magnesium regimens, anesthesia protocols, and surgical populations studied.
• Postoperative recovery. It is unclear if intravenous (IV) magnesium is beneficial for postoperative recovery. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study conducted in China in older adults undergoing total knee arthroplasty shows that administering IV magnesium sulfate 40 mg/kg prior to anesthesia induction then 15 mg/kg during surgery does not reduce extubation time, time spent in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), or duration of hospital stay when compared with control (113677). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 3 different clinical studies in adults undergoing surgery with general anesthesia shows that administering IV magnesium intraoperatively does not reduce extubation time (114676).
• Postoperative sleep disturbance. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for postoperative sleep disturbances. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing open heart surgery shows that taking magnesium oxide 250 mg orally twice daily during hospitalization moderately improves sleep scores when compared with no magnesium therapy. Magnesium therapy was held for the 2 days immediately following surgery (110054).
• Postoperative sore throat. It is unclear if topical magnesium sulfate is beneficial for reducing sore throat pain after endotracheal intubation. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation for surgery shows that using a gargle containing magnesium sulfate 20% with lidocaine, 20 minutes before anesthesia induction, is less effective for reducing sore throat pain than a gargle containing dexmedetomidine and lidocaine (112779). The study did not include a comparison to lidocaine alone.
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral magnesium reduces leg cramps during pregnancy; evidence is conflicting. Details: One small clinical study in patients with pregnancy-related leg cramps shows that taking magnesium bisglycinate chelate 300 mg daily for 4 weeks reduces the frequency and intensity of leg cramps when compared with placebo (99318). A smaller clinical study in this population shows that taking a specific mixture of magnesium lactate and citrate (Nycoplus Magnesium) providing elemental magnesium 120 mg in the morning and 240 mg in the evening for 3 weeks reduces the frequency of cramps when compared with placebo (1194). However, not all research agrees. One small clinical study using this same supplement and dose for 2 weeks found no benefit when compared with placebo (17463). It is possible that a 2-week duration of treatment is too short to be beneficial. Finally, a meta-analysis of these studies and one other more recent clinical study shows that taking magnesium does not reduce the frequency or improve the resolution of pregnancy-related leg cramps when compared with placebo (105916). This analysis may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference between treatment groups.
• Pre-procedural sedation. It is unclear if intravenous magnesium is beneficial when administered in addition to other medications used for sedation during surgery. Details: A moderate-sized study of adults aged 65-79 years old undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) shows that administering a single intravenous bolus of magnesium sulfate 40 mg/kg prior to the procedure reduces intraoperative propofol requirements by about 21% and reduces some peri-procedural adverse events including the incidence of respiratory depression and involuntary movement when compared with control. However, there were no differences in recovery time, hemodynamic parameters, or the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, perioperative nausea or vomiting, lethargy, or arrythmias (111694). Another moderate-sized study in older adults undergoing total knee arthroplasty shows that administering intravenous magnesium sulfate 40 mg/kg prior to anesthesia induction then 15 mg/kg during surgery does not reduce the need for medications used for anesthesia induction, intraoperative maintenance propofol requirements, or recovery time when compared with control. However, magnesium sulfate does seem to reduce the amount of remifentanil required for intraoperative anesthesia maintenance and increase norepinephrine requirements when compared with control (113677).
• Preterm labor. The use of magnesium sulfate to inhibit uterine contractions in preterm labor (tocolysis) is controversial. However, its use for the purpose of fetal neuroprotection for up to 48 hours is supported by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Details: Magnesium is given intravenously during preterm labor in an effort to improve fetal neurological outcomes. The typical dosage of magnesium sulfate is 4 grams infused IV over 10-30 minutes, followed by a maintenance infusion of 1-4 grams/hour for 48 hours or until birth. Use beyond 5-7 days has been associated with hypocalcemia and bone abnormalities in the fetus (15,12590,12594). Some meta-analyses of clinical research suggest that magnesium sulfate is more effective at delaying delivery by 48 hours when compared with oxytocin receptor blockers, nitrates, beta-mimetics, and/or placebo (20263,61021). Administration of magnesium during preterm labor has been shown to reduce the risk of cerebral palsy and motor dysfunction in the infant (60915,60927,60931,61001,97485,103734,103754,114681).
• Pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE). It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for PXE. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with PXE shows that taking magnesium oxide 800 mg (500 mg of elemental magnesium) twice daily for one year tends to reduce calcification of elastic skin fibers when compared with placebo, but the effect is not statistically significant (101393). This study was limited by small size and insufficient power to detect smaller effects.
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for RLS. Details: Some observational research has found that hypomagnesemia is associated with RLS; however, not all research agrees (8096,9472). Preliminary clinical research in adults with RLS who are beginning treatment with pramipexole shows that also taking magnesium oxide 250 mg orally daily for 2 months moderately improves RLS scores and sleep quality scores when compared with pramipexole and placebo (110052). Other low-quality clinical research in adults with RLS or periodic limb movement during sleep shows that taking magnesium 12.4 mmol orally in the evening for 4-6 weeks decreases movement and increases sleep when compared with baseline (9466). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Sarcopenia. It is unclear if oral magnesium is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of sarcopenia. Details: Population research in older adults has found that lower dietary intake of magnesium is associated with sarcopenia. However, the effect of magnesium supplementation on sarcopenia prevention or treatment has not been evaluated (110055). Magnesium has been evaluated in combination with other ingredients for treatment of sarcopenia. A small clinical study in elderly individuals with sarcopenia undergoing a diet and exercise program shows that taking a combination supplement containing magnesium 300 mg, carnosine, hydroxymethylbutyrate, lactoferrin, and sodium butyrate daily for 4 months increases muscle mass, as measured by the skeletal muscle index, and improves measures of muscle function, including handgrip muscle strength, chair test, and walking speed, when compared with placebo (114682). It is unclear if these effects are due to magnesium, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Sepsis. It is unclear if intravenous magnesium is beneficial for sepsis. Details: A very large observational study in patients with sepsis and hypomagnesaemia or normomagnesemia in the intensive care unit (ICU) suggests that administering intravenous magnesium sulfate 2 or 4 grams within 24 hours of admission reduces 28-day all-cause mortality from 25% in patients who did not use magnesium sulfate to 20% in those who were administered magnesium sulfate, regardless of baseline serum magnesium level and other baseline characteristics. Administration of intravenous magnesium sulfate in this population may also reduce ICU mortality by 4%, in-hospital mortality by 3%, and the use of renal replacement therapy by 3% but also seems to increase the length of ICU and hospital stay when compared with patients who did not use magnesium sulfate (113676). The validity of these results is limited by the observational nature of the study.
• Sleep deprivation. Oral magnesium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in sleep-deprived recreational athletes shows that taking a combination of magnesium 1350 mg, zinc 90 mg, and vitamin B6 31.5 mg for 3 nights at bedtime does not change sleep quality, subjective sleepiness, mood, or fatigue the next day when compared with placebo (113655).
• Stroke. Increased dietary magnesium may decrease stroke risk, and using a magnesium-containing salt substitute may improve neurological performance post-stroke. However, intravenous magnesium has not demonstrated benefit. Details: Most population research has found that increased dietary intake of magnesium is associated with decreased stroke risk and decreased mortality from stroke (9001,9002,90013,90030,90036,92107,103736). In patients who have had a stroke, a preliminary clinical study shows that using a salt substitute providing the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) of magnesium and potassium for 6 months improves neurological performance when compared with using regular salt (97491). However, intravenous (IV) magnesium does not seem to be beneficial in patients who have had a stroke. Large prospective clinical trials show that IV magnesium given within 12 hours of acute stroke does not reduce mortality or disability in most patients when compared with placebo. However, one subgroup analysis suggested that IV magnesium might benefit patients with lacunar (non-cortical) stroke (13361,90021). IV magnesium also doesn't seem to reduce cardiovascular complications after acute stroke. A secondary analysis of a clinical trial in patients after ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke shows that giving IV magnesium does not reduce serious cardiac adverse events when compared with placebo (104393). Another secondary analysis of this trial shows that giving IV magnesium prior to arrival at the hospital and within 2 hours of a hemorrhagic stroke does not reduce hematoma volume on hospital arrival, hematoma expansion during hospital admission, or functional outcomes at 3 months (108733).
• Subarachnoid hemorrhage. Intravenous magnesium sulfate may reduce the risk of adverse outcomes in people with subarachnoid hemorrhage, but evidence is conflicting. Details: There is mixed evidence regarding the effect of magnesium sulfate in managing aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. One meta-analysis of clinical research shows that intravenous magnesium sulfate 64-144 mmol/day for 10-18 days reduces the risk of poor outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, including death, vegetative state, or dependency, by 46% when compared with control (60932). Also, meta-analyses of clinical research show that intravenous magnesium reduces the risk of delayed cerebral ischemia by 27% when compared with placebo (60944,89398). However, these results were not confirmed in other meta-analyses (60973,90034).
• Thrombocytopenia. It is unclear if intravenous magnesium sulfate is beneficial in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Details: Addition of intravenous magnesium sulfate as a 6-gram loading dose followed by 6 grams infused over 24 hours for 3 days, to standard treatment for TTP does not reduce the time to normalization of the platelet count, the incidence of TTP-related organ dysfunction, or the recurrence rate, when compared with standard treatment alone (112777). This study may have been underpowered to detect a difference.
• Urinary incontinence. Although there has been interest in using oral magnesium for urinary incontinence, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of magnesium for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate magnesium for these uses.

(Read more about MAGNESIUM)

EFFECTIVE

• Manganese deficiency. Oral and intravenous manganese can prevent and treat manganese deficiency. Details: Taking manganese orally or intravenously is effective for preventing or treating manganese deficiency (15). However, the incidence of manganese deficiency is not well documented. Long-term home parenteral nutrition should provide no more than 55 mcg daily of manganese for adults or 1 mcg/kg daily (up to 50 mcg) of manganese for children unless clinically indicated (96416,99302). A clinical trial in children aged 8-14 months who are manganese deficient shows that taking manganese in addition to other vitamins and minerals in a 30 mL beverage six days per week for up to 14 months promotes growth when compared with placebo (19348).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if intranasal manganese is beneficial in patients with allergic rhinitis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chronic allergic rhinitis shows that using an isotonic seawater nasal spray enriched with manganese (Sterimar Mn, Laboratori Baldacci) four puffs daily for 5 months, in addition to standard treatment with oral antihistamines, nasal corticosteroids, and nasal decongestants, reduces the number of acute exacerbations by about three when compared with the standard treatment alone (99416). However, the effect of the manganese in this product is unclear since nasal lavage with a plain saline nasal spray also helps in allergic rhinitis.
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Intravenous manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients being treated for exacerbation of COPD shows that intravenous supplementation with manganese 0.4 mg, selenium 100 mcg, and zinc 2 mg daily may shorten the number of days spent on mechanical ventilation when compared with placebo (61432). It is unclear if these findings are due to manganese, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral intake of or environmental exposure to manganese decreases the risk of metabolic syndrome. Details: A meta-analysis of 12 observational studies suggests that increased dietary intake of manganese or higher levels of manganese in the serum, whole blood, or urine are not associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome when compared with lower manganese intake or laboratory values (112138).
• Obesity. Oral manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in overweight adults shows that taking a specific combination product (7-Keto Naturalean, Enzymatic Therapy, Inc.) containing manganese 500 mcg, 7-oxo-DHEA 100 mg, L-tyrosine 100 mg, asparagus root extract 100 mg, choline bitartrate 50 mg, inositol 50 mg, copper gluconate 500 mcg, and potassium iodide 100 mcg daily for 8 weeks reduces body weight by around 1.5 kg and body mass index (BMI) by around 0.7 kg/m² when compared with placebo (61581).
• Osteoarthritis. Oral manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Small clinical studies in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and lower back show that taking a specific combination product (Cosamin DS, Nutramax Laboratories) containing manganese ascorbate 228-304 mg (about 31-41 mg of elemental manganese), glucosamine hydrochloride 1500-2000 mg, and chondroitin sulfate 1200-1600 mg daily for 4 months improves pain and ability to do activities of daily living when compared with baseline or placebo (4237,7169). The amount of manganese in the Cosamin DS formulation used in this study is considerably higher than the 1 mg of elemental manganese per 1500 mg of glucosamine hydrochloride in the current formulation. Since numerous studies show glucosamine with chondroitin without manganese might be effective for osteoarthritis, it is not possible to draw conclusions about the effects of manganese alone.
• Osteoporosis. Oral manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in postmenopausal patients shows that taking manganese 5 mg in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg, zinc 15 mg, and copper 2.5 mg daily for 2 years reduces spinal bone loss when compared with placebo (1994). Another small clinical study in females with osteopenia shows that taking a specific combination product (Vitrum Osteomag, Unipharm Inc.) containing manganese 1.8 mg, calcium 600 mg, vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 200 IU, magnesium 40 mg, zinc 7.5 mg, copper 1 mg, and boron 250 mcg twice daily for one year improves bone mineral density when compared with no treatment (36840). However, since numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of calcium plus vitamin D for osteoporosis, it is not possible to draw conclusions about the effects of manganese alone.
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Oral manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with PMS shows that taking manganese 1.0 mg or 5.6 mg in combination with calcium 587 mg or 1336 mg daily for about 24 weeks improves symptoms of PMS including pain, crying, loneliness, anxiety, restlessness, irritability, mood swings, depression, and tension (2004).
• Wound healing. Topical manganese has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Observational research has found that applying an alginate dressing containing manganese, calcium, and zinc to chronic wounds for 12 weeks is associated with improved wound healing when compared with previous treatments (61327). It is unclear if these findings are due to manganese, other ingredients, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate manganese for these uses.

(Read more about MANGANESE)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Asthma. It is unclear if oral moringa seed is beneficial in patients with asthma. Details: A small clinical study in patients with mild to moderate asthma shows that taking powdered dried moringa seed kernels 3 grams twice daily for 3 weeks reduces the severity of asthma symptoms, including dyspnea, wheezing, chest tightness, and cough, and improves lung function when compared to baseline (19278). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Child growth. It is unclear if oral moringa, taken during the second or third trimester or while breastfeeding, can improve infant growth. Details: An observational follow-up of a large randomized clinical trial conducted in Indonesia during the second trimester or 1 month after giving birth shows that taking 500 mg moringa leaf powder or extract daily for 4 months does not reduce stunting in infants followed for up to 11 months when compared with an unspecified dose of iron and folate (105471,105472). Other observational data, also from a large randomized clinical trial conducted in Indonesia, suggests the rate of stunted growth in children aged 36 to 42 months is 25% after taking 500 mg moringa leaf extract daily for 3 months during the third trimester, compared to 42% with 500 mg moringa leaf flour, or 33% with iron 60 mg and 0.2 mcg folic acid (110645). Researchers propose that differences in the nutritional content between moringa leaf extract and flour may account for the variation in results among forms.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral moringa leaf is beneficial in patients with diabetes; research is conflicting. Details: A small clinical study in therapy-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking 4 grams of moringa leaf powder twice daily for 4 weeks does not affect fasting blood glucose (FBG) or postprandial glucose (PPG) when compared with placebo (105470). These findings are limited by the small size and short duration of the study. A non-randomized clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes who are taking a sulfonylurea shows that taking 2 tablets containing an unspecified amount of powdered moringa leaf in addition to following a calorie-restricted diet for 90 days does not reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) when compared with standard treatment, although it modestly reduces PPG when compared with baseline (90572). Another small non-randomized clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes who are taking hypoglycemic agents shows that taking powdered moringa leaf 8 grams daily for 40 days in addition to following a calorie-restricted diet reduces FBG, PPG, and lipid levels when compared with baseline (97208). It is unclear if any benefit identified in these studies is due to moringa or calorie restriction. Additionally, the validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a statistical comparison to the control group.
• HIV/AIDS. It is unclear if oral moringa leaf is beneficial in patients with HIV; research is conflicting. Details: Preliminary clinical research in normal weight Congolese patients with HIV who are on antiretroviral therapy shows that taking dried moringa leaf powder 10 grams three times daily with meals for 6 months increases body mass index (BMI) by 2 kg/m2 when compared with a nutritional counseling only group. However, there was no difference in immune function as measured by CD4 counts (97210). Results of other research are in conflict. A large clinical study in Nigerian adults treated with standard antivirals for HIV shows that taking moringa leaf powder 5 grams three times daily with meals for 6 months modestly increases CD4 counts but does not impact viral load or anthropometric parameters (i.e., weight, BMI) when compared with placebo. However, most patients were normal or overweight, and over half had an undetectable viral load at baseline (110648). Secondary analysis of this data suggests taking moringa may also improve quality of life (110649). However, the validity of this finding is limited by the inability to mask the taste of moringa leaf powder; patients may have been biased by knowing their study group assignment. Similarly, a small open label clinical study also in Nigerian adults treated with antiviral therapy for HIV shows that taking a moringa 200 mg capsule daily (Formula 10 Herbal Products, Nigeria) for 3 months modestly increases CD4 counts, lymphocyte and platelet counts, and hemoglobin when compared with antiviral therapy alone (110650).
• Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear if oral moringa leaf is beneficial in patients with hyperlipidemia. Details: One small clinical study in patients with hyperlipidemia shows that taking atorvastatin 10 mg daily with powder of an unspecified part of the moringa plant 1 gram twice daily for 45 days modestly reduces levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides when compared with taking atorvastatin alone (112639). Another small clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking powdered moringa leaf 8 grams daily in addition to following a calorie restricted diet for 40 days modestly reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels when compared with baseline (97208). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a statistical comparison to the control group, as well as small study size and short duration. In contrast, one small clinical study in patients of Indian descent with hyperlipidemia shows that taking 8 tablets of standardized dehydrated moringa drumstick leaf (DDL) 4.6 grams daily for 50 days has no effect on lipid levels when compared with baseline (97212).
• Iron deficiency anemia. It is unclear if oral moringa leaf flour is beneficial for anemia during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study in pregnant patients with anemia in Indonesia shows that consuming biscuits enriched with 5.6 grams of moringa leaf flour, in addition to iron 500 mg, daily for 60 days increases hemoglobin by 1 g/dL, compared to 0.66 mg/dL with iron 500 mg daily alone. (110647). The validity of this study is limited by poor methodology, including lack of randomization and blinding.
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral moringa leaf powder is beneficial for patients with prediabetes. Details: A small clinical study in treatment-naïve adults with prediabetes shows that taking moringa leaf powder 2400 mg daily for 12 weeks modestly improves fasting blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) but does not improve markers of insulin resistance or anthropometric measures (i.e. weight, BMI, waist circumference) when compared with placebo (110646).
• Lactation. Small clinical studies suggest that oral moringa leaf may modestly increase breastmilk volume during the first week of lactation. Details: A meta-analysis of 3 small clinical trials in breastfeeding patients shows that when started on postpartum day 3, moringa leaf increases breastmilk volume by about 120 mL per expression by day 7 when compared to control (90573). Studies included in the analysis used specific capsules containing moringa leaf (Natalac, Gruppo Medica Inc.) 250 mg twice daily on postpartum days 3-5 (20578), and specific capsules containing moringa leaf (Pro-Lacta, Pascual Laboratories, Inc.) 350 mg twice daily starting on postpartum day 3 and continuing for one week (90571). However, due to methodological limitations and the short duration of the included trials, the clinical significance of this finding is uncertain.
• Malnutrition. It is unclear if oral moringa leaf is beneficial for children with malnutrition. Details: One small clinical study in children with mild-to-moderate malnutrition shows that supplementing food with powdered dried moringa leaf 15 grams twice daily for 2 months results in 23 of 30 children having a 20% or greater improvement in weight, compared with only 2 of 30 children receiving no additional intervention (90576). It is unclear if maternal consumption of moringa leaves prevents malnutrition in infants. An observational follow-up of a large randomized clinical trial in Indonesian patients in their second trimester or one month postpartum shows that consuming four capsules, each containing 500 mg moringa leaf powder or extract, daily for 4 months might protect the infant against being underweight, but does not reduce stunting in infants followed for up to 11 months, when compared with an unspecified dose of iron and folate (105471,105472).
• Menopausal symptoms. It is unclear if oral moringa leaf improves menopausal symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in healthy postmenopausal patients shows that taking powdered moringa leaves 7 grams with food daily for 3 months modestly improves menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes and sleeping problems when compared with no dietary additives (90575).
• Obesity. Oral moringa leaf has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study shows that taking a combination product containing moringa leaf extract 200 mg, green coffee bean extract 300 mg, banaba leaf extract 100 mg, and vitamin D3 500 IU (CraveCheck, Advocare International) daily for 2 months does not reduce body weight when compared with placebo. In fact, patients in the placebo group showed slightly greater weight loss than patients in the treatment group. However, taking the combination product appears to reduce fat mass and increase fat-free or lean mass as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, suggesting that the combination product might improve body composition (97211). It is not clear if this effect is due to moringa, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Oral leukoplakia. It is unclear if topical moringa leaf improves oral leukoplakia. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with oral leukoplakia shows that topical application 3 times daily for 3 months with a gel providing moringa leaf extract 2% reduces lesion size by about 77% compared to baseline. Moringa gel is modestly more effective for reducing lesion size than a specific cream (Retino-A) (112640). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a placebo group.
• Vitamin A deficiency. It is unclear if oral moringa leaf is beneficial in infants deficient in vitamin A. Details: Preliminary clinical research conducted in rural Ghana shows that vitamin A-deficient infants aged 8-12 months who receive cereal supplemented with moringa leaf powder for 6 weeks do not have a significant improvement in vitamin A status when compared with those given cereal without moringa (98455). More evidence is needed to rate moringa for these uses.

(Read more about MORINGA)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Dyslipidemia. Niacin prescription products, in doses of 500 mg or greater, are FDA-approved for primary hyperlipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia. Niacin dietary supplements are generally available in lower doses and have not been shown to improve lipid levels. Details: Prescription niacin is not routinely recommended as second-line therapy for patients who primarily need to decrease low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. This is due to results from clinical trials showing no effect on cardiovascular related events or mortality (93346,93354,96208,96211,97308,97477,97336). However, niacin might be considered for patients with mixed hyperlipidemia or patients who need to increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and lower triglycerides. Niacin might also be effective for isolated hypoalphalipoproteinemia (4817). The most pronounced increases in HDL and decreases in triglycerides occur at 1-1.5 grams daily, and the greatest LDL reduction occurs at 2-3 grams daily. Niacin reduces LDL cholesterol by up to 25%, compared with up to a 55% reduction with statins. High-dose niacin can also decrease triglycerides by 20% to 50%, increase HDL by 13% to 35%, decrease apolipoprotein B levels by 2% to 20%, and decrease lipoprotein(a) levels by 23% (4818,4886,4887,4888,4889,4890,12033,25567,93347,96213). The effects of higher dose extended-release niacin on LDL cholesterol and triglycerides appear to be greater in females than males (25565). Experts recommend maximizing statins first because they have the best evidence for improving cardiovascular outcomes (97477,97336,97337). However, if patients cannot reach their LDL goal with a statin alone or if they cannot tolerate a statin, niacin might be combined with other cholesterol-lowering drugs when diet and single-drug therapy are not adequately effective (8545,25566,93351,94191,97337). Adding low-dose niacin, 50 mg daily, to statin therapy has no additional benefit on lipid levels (8546). Population research in adults without dyslipidemia has also found that higher dietary intake of niacin for 3-10 years is associated with a 29% lower risk of developing dyslipidemia when compared with low dietary niacin intake (110493).
• Pellagra. Oral niacin is FDA-approved for the prevention and treatment of pellagra. Details: Population research has found that low consumption of niacin is associated with an increased risk of developing pellagra (25903). Taking niacin 500-1000 mg daily can resolve symptoms of pellagra within a week of treatment initiation (25904). However, niacinamide is sometimes preferred for this indication because it lacks the vasodilating effects of niacin (15,6243).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• HIV/AIDS-related dyslipidemia. Oral niacin seems to improve lipid levels in patients with dyslipidemia due to HIV/AIDs. Details: Small clinical trials in HIV patients with dyslipidemia associated with antiretroviral therapy shows that taking extended-release niacin (Niaspan, Abbott Laboratories) titrated up to 2 grams daily for 14-48 weeks improves total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride levels when compared to baseline (25570,25902). Other preliminary clinical research in this population shows that taking extended-release niacin (Niaspan, Abbott Laboratories) titrated to 2 grams daily for up to 2 years improves HDL cholesterol levels, but not total cholesterol or triglyceride levels, when compared with no treatment (25569).
• Metabolic syndrome. Oral niacin seems to improve lipid levels in patients with metabolic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking niacin (Niaspan, Abbott Laboratories) 2 grams daily orally for 16 weeks reduces triglyceride levels by 39 mg/dL and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by 5 mg/dL when compared to baseline in patients with metabolic syndrome. These improvements are significant when compared with placebo and are further increased when niacin is taken along with prescription omega-3 ethyl esters (Lovaza, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals) 4 grams daily orally (93353). However, niacin does not seem to improve postprandial glucose levels in patients with metabolic syndrome (97333).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral niacin does not seem to reduce cardiovascular-related events in patients with or without CVD. Details: Overall, niacin is not recommended for primary or secondary prevention of CVD. Most clinical trials and meta-analyses conducted prior to 2011 showed a reduction in cardiovascular-related events, cardiovascular-related mortality, and all-cause mortality in patients taking niacin alone or in combination with a statin or clofibrate for primary or secondary prevention of CVD (4847,7388,25095,25911,25912,93349). However, recent meta-analyses of these studies and additional moderate-to-high quality research conducted in over 39,000 patients show no effect of niacin on cardiovascular-related events, cardiovascular-related mortality, or overall mortality (93346,93354,96208,96211,97308). Additionally, one meta-analysis shows that patients taking niacin are twice as likely to report side effects when compared with placebo (96211).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial for reducing Alzheimer disease risk. Details: Observational research has found that consuming higher amounts of niacin (17-45 mg daily) from food and supplements is associated with a slower cognitive decline and a lower risk of developing Alzheimer disease when compared with people who consume less niacin (14 mg daily) (12077). It is not known if the risk of Alzheimer disease is reduced by taking a stand-alone niacin supplement.
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral niacin prevents atherosclerosis progression. Details: Preliminary clinical studies show that taking niacin orally, in combination with colestipol for up to 2 years, might modestly reduce progression of atherosclerosis as measured by coronary lesions and carotid arterial intima-media thickness in high-risk males with existing coronary atherosclerosis (25906,25909,25910). However, niacin does not seem to be better than statins. One clinical study in adults with atherosclerosis and peripheral arterial disease shows that taking extended-release niacin 1500 mg, simvastatin 40 mg, and ezetimibe 10 mg daily for 2 years does not reduce atherosclerosis of the superficial femoral artery when compared with simvastatin alone (96208). Niacin has also not been shown to prevent cardiovascular events or mortality (93346,93354,96208,96211,97308).
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral niacin improves athletic performance. Details: Preliminary clinical research in untrained adult males shows that taking niacin 1000 mg orally once before a cycling test does not improve power, respiratory exchange ratio, or time to exhaustion when compared with placebo. In addition, these measures were significantly worse when compared with taking caffeine 5 mg/kg orally as a single dose (107942). Clinical research in untrained males also shows that taking a supplement containing niacin 40 mg, caffeine 400 mg, capsicum extract 66.7 mg, and black pepper extract 10 mg prior to exercising does not improve strength, time to exhaustion, or maximal oxygen consumption when compared with placebo (37873).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although there is interest in using oral niacin for ADHD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacin for this condition.
• Cancer. It is unclear if dietary niacin is beneficial for cancer. Details: Population research in adults with cancer has found that high dietary niacin intake is associated with 49% and 27% lower risk of cancer-related mortality and all-cause mortality when compared with low dietary niacin intake. The same study also found that taking niacin supplements is associated with a lower risk of cancer-related mortality, but not all-cause mortality when compared with not taking niacin supplements (110496).
• Cataracts. It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial for preventing cataracts. Details: Population research has found that high dietary intake of niacin is associated with a reduced risk of nuclear cataracts (6378). However, there is no reliable evidence that niacin supplements reduce the risk of cataracts.
• Cholera. It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial for cholera. Details: One small clinical study in adults with severe cholera shows that taking 1-2 grams niacin orally reduces fluid loss in the stool by 31% to 47% in the first 16 hours when compared with control. The 2 gram dose seemed to result in a greater reduction in fluid loss than the 1 gram dose (4868).
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial in patients with ED and dyslipidemia. Details: Clinical research in patients with erectile dysfunction and dyslipidemia shows that taking extended-release niacin (Niaspan, Abbott Laboratories) titrated to 1.5 grams nightly for a total of 12 weeks significantly improves penetration frequency and the maintenance of an erection after penetration when compared to baseline (25913). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Glaucoma. It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial for preventing or treating glaucoma. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of niacin is associated with a lower odds of having glaucoma. However, this association was not consistently present when adjusting for confounders. The effects of niacin supplementation on glaucoma have not been evaluated (107942).
• Hyperphosphatemia. It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial for preventing high levels of phosphorus in the blood. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients on maintenance dialysis who are no longer using phosphate binders shows that taking niacin 375-750 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces serum phosphorus levels by 2.1 mg/dL, increases calcium levels by 0.4 mg/dL, and decreases serum alkaline phosphatase when compared with baseline (25914). However, clinical research in hemodialysis patients with inadequate phosphate control despite using standard phosphate-binding therapy shows that taking niacin at the maximum tolerated dose, up to 1000 mg daily, for 12 weeks, does not decrease serum phosphate levels when compared with placebo (93341). It is possible that this latter study was too small to observe between-group differences in changes in serum phosphate levels.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if dietary niacin is beneficial for preventing hypertension. Details: Observational research in Chinese adults found a J-shaped association between dietary niacin intake and development of hypertension, with the lowest risk occurring in those with a daily dietary niacin intake of 14.3-16.7 mg (104934).
• Meniere disease. Although there is interest in using oral niacin for Meniere disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacin for this condition.
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if dietary niacin is beneficial for preventing migraine headaches. Details: Population research in adults has found that high dietary intake of niacin is associated with a 28% lower likelihood of having migraine headaches when compared with low dietary intake of niacin (110495). However, the effect of niacin supplementation on migraines has not been studied.
• Motion sickness. Although there is interest in using oral niacin for motion sickness, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacin for this purpose.
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial for improving Parkinson disease symptoms. Details: Low-quality clinical research in adults with Parkinson disease shows that taking slow-release niacin 250 mg orally daily for 12 months improves Parkinson disease motor scores and fatigue scores by 17% and 26%, respectively, when compared with baseline (107944). However, higher quality clinical research shows that taking niacin 250 mg orally daily for 6 months does not improve Parkinson disease motor scores when compared with placebo (107943).
• Retinal vein occlusion. It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial for improving retinal vein occlusion symptoms. Details: A small case series in patients with chronic retinal vein occlusion shows that taking niacin titrated to 500 mg three times daily for 1 year is associated with reduced central macular thickness and improved visual acuity in over 50% of patients when compared with a control group. The addition of prednisolone eye drops does not alter the outcomes of those taking niacin (96212). The validity of this finding is limited due to the retrospective nature of this study.
• Sickle cell disease. It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial for improving lipid levels in patients with sickle cell disease. Details: A small clinical study in patients with sickle cell disease shows that taking extended-release niacin titrated to 1.5 grams daily for 12 weeks does not improve vascular function or increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) or apolipoprotein A-I cholesterol levels when compared with placebo (96209).
• Schizophrenia. Although there is interest in using oral niacin for schizophrenia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacin for this condition.
• Vertigo. Although there is interest in using oral niacin for vertigo, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacin for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate niacin for these uses.

(Read more about NIACIN)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Scarring. Clinical research in adults and children shows that topical application of onion extract, often as part of combination products, for 10 weeks to 6 months is beneficial for preventing scarring; however, the most effective combination of ingredients, dosage form, and dose are unclear. Details: Many small clinical trials show that using topical onion extract improves the appearance, as well as pain and itching, associated with postburn hypertrophic scars, keloidal scars, scars following tattoo removal, scars following Cesarean delivery, or scars following surgical removal of tissue when compared with control (66895,66918,66939,66951,66987,67089,67104,95151,95156,95159,104773). Products evaluated in clinical research have included gels containing a combination of onion extract, heparin, and allantoin (Contractubex, Merz Pharmaceuticals) (66895,66987,67089,67104,104773); a combination of onion extract and a silicone derivative (Cybele scagel, Bangkok Botanica) (95156,95159); a combination of onion extract, allantoin, pentaglycan, and a solution of glycosaminoglycans (Kaloidon gel, Laboratori Farmacologici Milanesi) (95151); and a transdermal patch containing a combination of onion extract and allantoin (104771). However, not all research agrees. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using onion extract gel for scar management demonstrated mixed results when compared with control. However, the validity of the study is limited by high heterogeneity (109511). In addition, a specific product containing onion extract and allantoin (Mederma, Merz Pharmaceuticals) for 4-11 weeks does not appear to improve the appearance of new surgical scars (66742,66883). Similarly, observational research has found that a topical patch containing onion extract and allantoin is not associated with improved provider- or patient-assessed appearance of scars following cesarean-delivery after 4 weeks when compared with those using no scar treatment (104771). It is possible that the duration of treatment in these studies was inadequate to identify improvement.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Obesity. Clinical research does not support the use of dietary onion or onion supplements for weight loss. Details: Clinical research in overweight patients shows that taking capsules containing steamed onion (Oniro, Kunpoong Bio Co., Ltd) 300 mg orally three times daily for 12 weeks does not reduce body mass index (BMI), fat distribution, or fat mass when compared with placebo (101747). In addition, one clinical study in overweight and obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) shows that eating raw red onion 80-120 grams daily can actually increase BMI by 0.36 kg/m2 when compared with eating 20-30 grams of raw red onion (95155). Clinical studies have also used onion products standardized by quercetin content. Preliminary clinical research in overweight and obese patients shows that taking onion peel extract providing quercetin 100 mg orally daily for 12 weeks reduces body weight by up to 1.1 kg and BMI by up to 0.4 kg/m2 when compared to baseline, but not when compared with placebo (95152,101748). Another small clinical study in healthy, overweight Japanese adults shows that taking an onion powder containing quercetin 60 mg orally daily for 12 weeks does not reduce body weight, BMI, abdominal circumference, or abdominal fat when compared with the same quantity of quercetin-free onion powder (104772).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alopecia areata. It is unclear if topical onion is beneficial in patients with alopecia areata. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children and adults with alopecia areata shows that topical application of raw onion juice twice daily for 8 weeks improves hair growth when compared with placebo. Hair regrowth was demonstrated in 74% of subjects using onion juice, compared with 13% using placebo (66797).
• Angina. Although there has been interest in using oral onion for angina, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of onion for this purpose.
• Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral onion for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of onion for this purpose.
• Atherosclerosis. Although there has been interest in using oral onion for atherosclerosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of onion for this purpose.
• Bruises. Although there has been interest in using topical onion for bruises, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of onion for this purpose.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral onion is beneficial in patients with diabetes. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking fresh onion 20 grams orally three times daily, in addition to consuming a controlled diet, for 8 weeks decreases blood glucose levels by 5% when compared with a controlled diet alone (67072).
• Dyspepsia. Although there has been interest in using oral onion for dyspepsia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of onion for this purpose.
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral onion is beneficial for preventing gastric cancer. Details: Population research has found that the highest dietary intake of onion is associated with a 48% reduced odds of gastric cancer when compared with the lowest intake (51460).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral onion is beneficial in patients with hypertension. Details: Preliminary clinical research in overweight or obese adults with prehypertension or hypertension shows that taking onion skin extract 132 mg orally three times daily for 6 weeks reduces 24-hour systolic blood pressure by 4 mmHg, but does not affect diastolic blood pressure, when compared with placebo (95149). Other preliminary clinical research in patients with hypertension shows that taking a specific product (Campo di mele formula, Phyt-Immun) containing onion 2.5 grams, olive oil 5 mL, grape skin extract 50 mg, L-carnitine 30 mg, vitamin E 3 mg, vitamin C 2 mg, lycopene 1 mg, and folic acid 44 mcg, once daily for one week, decreases systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 5 mmHg and 2 mmHg, respectively, when compared with placebo (66766). It is unclear if this effect is due to onion, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Hypothyroidism. It is unclear if oral onion is beneficial for preventing hypothyroidism. Details: Population research in females has found that high dietary intake of onion is associated with a lower risk of subclinical hypothyroidism when compared with low dietary intake, However, this association was not identified in males. The association of dietary onion intake with symptomatic hypothyroidism was not evaluated (109512).
• Insect bite. Although there has been interest in using topical onion for insect bites, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of onion for this purpose.
• Insomnia. It is unclear if oral onion is beneficial in patients with poor sleep quality. Details: Preliminary clinical research in healthy adults that were unsatisfied with their current sleep quality shows that taking onion extract 500 mg orally three times daily for 5 days may slightly improve sleep latency and waking after sleep onset, but does not change self-rated sleep quality, when compared with placebo (104774).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral onion is beneficial in patients with PCOS. Details: Clinical research in overweight or obese adults with PCOS shows that eating 80-120 grams of raw red onion daily does not improve levels of fasting blood glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, or lipoprotein (a), and can increase body mass index (BMI) by 0.36 kg/m2, when compared with eating 20-30 grams of raw red onion daily (95155).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral onion is beneficial for preventing prostate cancer. Details: Population research has found that high dietary intake of onion is not associated with a lower odds of developing prostate cancer when compared with low dietary intake of onion (88410).
• Respiratory tract infections. Although there has been interest in using oral onion for respiratory tract infections, including the common cold, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of onion for this purpose.
• Stretch marks (striae distensae). Topical onion has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adult females shows that applying a specific cream (Mederma For Stretch Marks, Merz Pharmaceuticals) containing onion extract, gotu kola, and hyaluronic acid to striae rubra twice daily for 12 weeks improves stretch mark scores, including color, softness, and texture, when compared with no treatment (95154).
• Warts. Although there has been interest in using topical onion for warts, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of onion for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate onion for these uses.

(Read more about ONION)

EFFECTIVE

• Pantothenic acid deficiency. Taking pantothenic acid 5-10 mg daily is effective for treating and preventing pantothenic acid deficiency (15).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Radiation dermatitis. Topical dexpanthenol does not seem to be beneficial for preventing or treating radiation dermatitis. Details: Applying dexpanthenol, an analog of pantothenic acid, twice daily to areas of irradiated skin does not seem to reduce erythema, desquamation, itching, or pain following radiation treatment (7192). Also, applying dexpanthenol 0.5% cream (Bepanthen, Hoffmann LaRoche ) daily during radiation therapy and for 2 weeks after completing radiation therapy is less effective than methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% cream (Advantan) at reducing radiation-induced skin irritation (67779).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Oral or topical pantothenic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In adults with mild to moderate acne, clinical research shows that taking a specific supplement (Pantothen, Avilan Marketing LLC) providing pantothenic acid 1.1 grams twice daily in addition to other B vitamins for 12 weeks modestly reduces total and non-inflammatory lesion counts when compared with placebo (105188). Also, in adolescents or young adults with mild to moderate acne, preliminary clinical research shows that topical application with a gel containing D-panthenol 4%, hydrogen peroxide 4%, and salicylic acid 0.5% once daily for 60 days modestly reduces acne lesions when compared with baseline (105189). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Alcoholism. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for improving recovery from alcoholism, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for allergic rhinitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Alopecia areata. Pantothenic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults with diffuse hair loss shows that intramuscular administration of dexpanthenol 250 mg and biotin 5 mg once weekly for 6 weeks reduces hair fall count at weeks 1 and 8, but only increases hair density at week 1, when compared to baseline (111366). The validity of these findings is limited by the study's small size, short duration, and lack of comparator group.
• Anxiety. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this purpose.
• Asthma. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Athletic performance. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid to improve athletic performance, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this purpose.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Oral pantothenic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Some small outdated clinical studies in children diagnosed with hyperkinesis suggest that taking calcium pantothenate 1.2 grams, alone or in combination with niacinamide, ascorbic acid, and pyridoxine, does not improve symptoms of hyperactivity when compared with placebo (3351,9957). It is unclear what effects pantothenic may have, if any, in children with a modern diagnosis of ADHD.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if topical pantothenic acid is beneficial in infants or children with atopic dermatitis. Details: One preliminary clinical trial in infants and children with stable mild atopic dermatitis shows that topical application of an emollient containing panthenol (Bepanthen, SensiDaily, Bayer Consumer Care AG) for 3 months is as effective as a reference emollient for reducing symptoms and preventing a flare. However, the efficacy of the reference emollient (Stelatopia Emollient Cream, Mustela; Laboratoires Expanscience) is unclear based on available preliminary clinical research (105190).
• Autism spectrum disorder. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for autism spectrum disorder, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Carpal tunnel syndrome. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for carpal tunnel syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Cheilitis. Topical pantothenic acid has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small, open-label study in adults with mild-to-moderate cheilitis shows that applying a specific lip care product containing pantothenic acid and bisabolol (Eucerin Aquaphor SOS lip care) at least twice daily for 8 weeks reduces cheilitis severity scores by 5 points on a 12 point scale assessing erythema, scale, fissure, and inflammation when compared to baseline (114549). The validity of this finding is limited by the small study size and lack of a comparator group. Additionally, it is unclear if this effect is due to pantothenic acid, bisabolol, or the combination.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Conjunctivitis. Although there is interest in using oral or ocular pantothenic acid for conjunctivitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Constipation. It is unclear if oral or intramuscular dexpanthenol is beneficial for constipation. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that administering dexpanthenol (Bepanthene), an analog of pantothenic acid, 400 mg orally or 500 mg intramuscularly daily for 5 days decreases the time to a bowel movement in patients with chronic or occasional constipation when compared with an oral placebo (67822).
• Dandruff. Although there is interest in using oral or topical pantothenic acid for dandruff, is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Depression. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Diaper rash. Although there is interest in using topical pantothenic acid for diaper rash, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Dry eye. Although there is interest in using ocular pantothenic acid for dry eye, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Dry skin. It is unclear if topical dexpanthenol is beneficial for patients with dry skin. Details: A small, open-label study in healthy adults with dry skin shows that cleansing the skin with a dexpanthenol-containing liquid cleanser (DCLC, Bepanthen SensiControl Daily Gentle Body Wash) daily for 4 weeks increases stratum corneum hydration by 17% without affecting skin barrier function, pH, or microbiome when compared to baseline (111262). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of blinding and a comparator group.
• Epilepsy. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for epilepsy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Eye trauma. It is unclear if ocular dexpanthenol is beneficial for eye trauma. Details: Some preliminary clinical research shows that using eyedrops containing dexpanthenol 5%, a derivative of pantothenic acid, two drops four times daily for 28 days following surgery for retinal detachment reduces eye pain and discomfort when compared with placebo drops (67783). However, using a specific dexpanthenol 5% ointment (Bepanthen) does not seem to improve corneal epithelial wound healing following phototherapeutic keratectomy when compared with placebo (67801).
• Heart failure. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for heart failure, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Herpes zoster (shingles). Although there is interest in using oral or topical pantothenic acid for shingles, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Insomnia. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for insomnia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Laser skin resurfacing. It is unclear if topical dexpanthenol or pantothenic acid can reduce adverse effects after laser skin resurfacing procedures. Details: A preliminary clinical study shows that use of a dexpanthenol-containing ointment (Bepanthen Wound Healing Ointment, Bayer) once daily modestly reduces the diameter of lesions up to 3 days after fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing when compared with petroleum jelly (105743). Also, applying a specific cream (Cicaplast Baume B5 cream, L'Oreal) containing panthenol 5%, madecassoside, copper, zinc, and manganese to one side of the face for 28 days reduces decrustation time by approximately one day when compared with a control emollient. Redness and swelling were lower at 3 days, but there was no difference in pain and burning (105742). It is unclear if these effects are due to pantothenic acid, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for MS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Muscular dystrophy. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for muscular dystrophy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Nipple fissures. Although there is interest in using topical pantothenic acid for nipple fissures, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Obesity. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for obesity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Pain (chronic). It is unclear if oral or topical pantothenic acid is beneficial for the management of various forms of chronic pain. Details: Although there is interest in using oral or topical pantothenic acid for various forms of chronic pain, including neuropathy and arthritis, there is limited information available about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this purpose. One review of preliminary clinical research found that calcium pantothenate does not reduce symptoms of arthritis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis (10433).
• Parkinson disease. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for Parkinson disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Poison oak and poison ivy dermatitis. Although there is interest in using topical pantothenic acid for poison ivy dermatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Postoperative pain. It is unclear if oral pantothenic acid is beneficial for postoperative pain. Details: In post-tonsillectomy patients aged 5-12 years, preliminary clinical research shows that taking pastilles containing dexpanthenol (Bepanthene, Bayer) 100 mg three times daily reduces pain when compared with placebo. Postoperative pain was modestly reduced at 1, 3, 7, and 14 days after surgery (105191).
• Postoperative sore throat. It is unclear if pantothenic acid lozenges are beneficial for postoperative sore throat. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking two lozenges containing dexpanthenol, an analog of pantothenic acid, 200 mg 30 minutes prior to general anesthesia reduces the incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat when compared with a benzydamine hydrochloride or placebo spray (67792).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for pregnancy-related leg cramps, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for PMS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Respiratory tract infections. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for respiratory tract infections, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Rhinosinusitis. It is unclear if nasal dexpanthenol is beneficial for rhinosinusitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that using a nasal spray (MarPlus) containing dexpanthenol, an analog of pantothenic acid, on the first, second, fourth, and sixth week after endoscopic sinus surgery reduces nasal discharge, but not other symptoms associated with chronic rhinosinusitis, when compared with saline nasal spray (67808).
• Skin irritation. It is unclear if topical dexpanthenol is beneficial for preventing or treating skin irritation due to sodium lauryl sulfate. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying dexpanthenol (Bepanthol Handbalsam), an analog of pantothenic acid, twice daily for 26 days does not prevent sodium lauryl sulfate-induced skin irritation (67785). However, dexpanthenol may be effective for treating skin irritation caused by sodium lauryl sulfate. Use of an ointment containing dexpanthenol 1% to 5% twice daily for up to 30 days following skin exposure to sodium lauryl sulfate seems to reduce skin water loss, skin roughness, and skin inflammation when compared to control (67802,67806).
• Ulcerative colitis. Although there is interest in using oral or rectal pantothenic acid for ulcerative colitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Vertigo. Although there is interest in using oral pantothenic acid for vertigo, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pantothenic acid for this condition.
• Wound healing. Preliminary clinical research suggests that oral dexpanthenol might be beneficial for wound healing. Details: In post-tonsillectomy patients aged 5-12 years, preliminary clinical research shows that taking pastilles containing dexpanthenol (Bepanthene, Bayer) 100 mg three times daily improves wound healing when compared with placebo. Depending on the type of surgery, wound healing occurred in 2.3-2.9 times as many patients within 7 days of surgery, and in 13% to 35% more patients within 14 days, when compared with placebo (105191). More evidence is needed to rate pantothenic acid for these uses.

(Read more about PANTOTHENIC ACID)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Abortion. Although there has been interest in using oral parsley to induce abortion, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of parsley for this purpose.
• Constipation. Although there has been interest in using oral parsley for constipation, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of parsley for this purpose.
• Diabetes. Although there has been interest in using oral parsley for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of parsley for this purpose.
• Dry skin. Although there has been interest in using topical parsley for dry skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of parsley for this purpose.
• Dyspepsia. Although there has been interest in using oral parsley for dyspepsia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of parsley for this purpose.
• Hypertension. Although there has been interest in using oral parsley for hypertension, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of parsley for this purpose.
• Insect bite. Although there has been interest in using topical parsley for insect bites, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of parsley for this purpose.
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Although there has been interest in using oral parsley for kidney stones, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of parsley for this purpose.
• Melasma. It is unclear if topical parsley is beneficial for melasma. Details: A small clinical study in adults with melasma shows that applying a brewed parsley water to the face with a cotton ball on 6 days of each week for 8 weeks is as effective as hydroquinone 4% cream for improving dark spots (96828).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. Although there has been interest in using topical parsley to prevent nonmelanoma skin cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of parsley for this purpose.
• Osteoarthritis. Although there has been interest in using oral parsley for osteoarthritis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of parsley for this purpose.
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Although there has been interest in using oral parsley for UTIs, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of parsley for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate parsley for these uses.

(Read more about PARSLEY)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Aging skin. Topical red raspberry leaf has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in females aged 30-65 years shows that applying a specific liquid (Antioxidant and Collagen Booster Serum, Max Biocare Pty Ltd.) containing red raspberry leaf cell culture extract 0.0005%, vitamin C 20%, and vitamin E 1% to the face nightly for 8 weeks, in addition to regular facial skin products, improves skin color, elasticity, radiance, smoothness, and appearance of wrinkles when compared with regular facial skin products alone (102355).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for CVD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Congestive heart failure (CHF). Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for CHF, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Diabetes. Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Dysmenorrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for dysmenorrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Hypertension. Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for hypertension, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Influenza. Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for influenza, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Labor pain. Some research suggests that oral red raspberry leaf does not reduce analgesic use during labor. Details: Clinical research shows that taking red raspberry leaf 2.4 grams daily, beginning at 32 weeks' gestation and continuing until delivery, does not decrease the need for analgesics in the perinatal time period when compared with placebo (9796). A systematic review of retrospective studies also supports these findings, showing no improvement in perineal outcomes in patients consuming red raspberry leaf prior to labor (108005).
• Menorrhagia. Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for menorrhagia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral red raspberry fruit is beneficial in patients with obesity. Details: Preliminary clinical research in overweight and obese adults shows that consuming frozen red raspberry fruit 280 grams daily for 8 weeks does not reduce body mass index or waist circumference when compared with control (105873).
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral red raspberry leaf extract is beneficial for knee osteoarthritis. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in patients with knee osteoarthritis shows that taking red raspberry leaf extract 200 or 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks reduces pain at the higher dose when measured by the visual analog scale, but does not improve physical performance, physical activity, walking distance, or Western Ontario McMaster osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) global score or pain, stiffness, and function subscores when compared with placebo (112127).
• Parturition. Some research suggests that oral red raspberry leaf does not shorten the duration of labor. Details: Clinical research shows that taking red raspberry leaf 2.4 grams daily, beginning at 32 weeks' gestation and continuing until delivery, does not reduce the length of labor when compared with placebo (108005). Traditionally, doses of up to 4 grams daily have been recommended for this purpose; however, doses greater than 2.4 grams daily have not been evaluated for safety or efficacy. Further high-quality research is needed to determine the optimal dose, duration, and formulation, if any, of red raspberry leaf for this purpose.
• Pharyngitis. Although there has been interest in using topical red raspberry leaf for pharyngitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Respiratory tract infections. Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for respiratory tract infections, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate red raspberry leaf for this use.

(Read more about RED RASPBERRY)

EFFECTIVE

• Ariboflavinosis. Oral riboflavin can treat and prevent low riboflavin levels.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Hyperhomocysteinemia. Oral riboflavin reduces homocysteine levels in individuals with the MTHFR 677 TT genotype. It does not seem to provide benefit in individuals with other genotypes. Details: Population research has found that poor riboflavin status is associated with high homocysteine levels in individuals with the 677 TT genotype for the MTHFR enzyme (71386,71403,71409). Taking riboflavin 1.6 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces homocysteine levels by 22% to 40% in individuals with the 677 TT genotype of MTHFR when compared with pretreatment. However, riboflavin supplementation does not seem to reduce homocysteine levels in individuals with the 677 CC or CT genotypes (71443).
• Migraine headache. Oral riboflavin modestly reduces migraine attack frequency and severity in adults. The benefits of oral riboflavin in children are unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of 5 small clinical trials in adults with migraine shows that taking riboflavin 100-400 mg daily, alone or in combination with other natural ingredients, for three months modestly reduces migraine duration, frequency, and pain scores when compared with control (105480). These findings are limited by significant heterogeneity. Most clinical studies compared riboflavin 400 mg daily with placebo, no treatment, or an active control (1396,1397,1398,12387,105480). Limited evidence also suggests that taking riboflavin 400 mg daily might be no different for migraine prevention than certain conventional treatments such as bisoprolol 10 mg, metoprolol 200 mg, propranolol 80 mg, or valproate 500 mg (1396,105480). These findings are limited due to small study size and a lack of power to detect a difference between groups. Limited research has also evaluated riboflavin in children. A network meta-analysis of 3 small clinical trials in children with migraine shows that taking oral riboflavin 100-200 mg daily for 4-12 months does not significantly reduce incidence of migraine when compared with placebo. However, there was a non-significant trend towards reduced migraine frequency. Furthermore, conventional treatments such as propranolol, pregabalin, valproate, and topiramate were not shown to be significantly better than riboflavin for migraine prevention (105484). These findings are limited by small population sizes and insufficient power to detect differences between groups. Although riboflavin 100-200 mg has been used in prospective clinical studies, small observational studies have found some benefit in children taking riboflavin doses as low as 10-40 mg daily and as high as 400 mg daily for 3-4 months (105481,105485). Riboflavin has also been studied in combination with other ingredients, with research suggesting potential benefit. Specifically, riboflavin 400 mg has been combined with magnesium 600 mg and coenzyme Q10 150 mg daily (Dolovent; Linpharma Inc.) (92101), and also with magnesium 300 mg and feverfew 100 mg daily (12389).