Synetrim CQ Advantage by Indiana Botanic Gardens

EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Oral calcium carbonate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an antacid. Details: Taking calcium carbonate orally as an antacid is effective for treating dyspepsia (1843). Calcium carbonate has FDA approval as an antacid.
• Hyperkalemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities. Details: Administering calcium gluconate intravenously can reverse electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias induced by hyperkalemia (12946). Intravenous calcium gluconate is FDA-approved for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities.
• Hypocalcemia. Oral calcium treats and prevents hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium is used to treat severe hypocalcemia. Details: Taking calcium orally is effective for treating and preventing hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate, acetate, gluceptate, or chloride is effective for severe hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany (12928).
• Kidney failure. Oral calcium carbonate or calcium acetate is used as a phosphate binder during kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium carbonate or calcium acetate orally is effective as a phosphate binder. Calcium acetate (PhosLo) appears to control hyperphosphatemia better than sevelamer (Renagel) (12943,12944,38990). Calcium citrate is not recommended for this purpose because it increases aluminum absorption and does not bind phosphate as efficiently as calcium acetate or calcium carbonate (21631). Some clinical research also shows that taking calcium orally reduces blood pressure in patients with kidney failure (975).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral calcium in combination with vitamin D prevents bone density loss that occurs during long-term treatment with corticosteroids. Details: Taking calcium in combination with vitamin D as adjunctive therapy seems to be effective for reducing bone mineral density loss in people using corticosteroids long-term (982,1046,1830,1831,1832,4462,4463,4464,4465,4466)(4467,12945,38493). One specific product used in clinical research is Oscal (Marion Merrel Dow Inc.), which contains elemental calcium 500 mg per tablet plus vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (982). Another product used is Oscal 250 + D (SmithKline Beecham Healthcare), which contains elemental calcium 250 mg and vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (1046).
• Hyperparathyroidism. Oral calcium reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium orally reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with kidney failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism (1827,1828,1829,39174,39425). In elderly women, the combination of calcium and vitamin D reverses secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces hip fracture risk (8818). Also, population research suggests increased calcium intake from the diet and supplements reduces the risk of primary hyperparathyroidism in women. Supplemental intakes of at least 500 mg/day and dietary intakes of approximately 1100 mg/day are considered to be protective (91353).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate calcium intake, from the diet and/or supplements, is recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate calcium intake in line with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) by age, along with adequate vitamin D intake, for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake when adequate dietary intake is not feasible (109425). In the US and Canada, foods containing at least 200 mg calcium with less phosphorous content than calcium can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate calcium intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (11940,102148). However, calcium supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Also, calcium supplements do not seem to be effective for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) during lactation (988), in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation (1817), or in patients who have had renal transplantation (4823,38736,38871). Maximal bone growth occurs in the teenage years, and then BMD in females remains relatively constant until age 30-40. After age 40, bone loss typically occurs at rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. In males, this occurs several decades later. Bone loss is more pronounced if dietary calcium intake is below the RDA, which is the case for many Americans (2571,2578). One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy children 7-14 years old shows that fortifying food with calcium 250-1000 mg daily for up to 24 months modestly improves femoral neck BMD, but not hip or spine BMD. However, the included trials did not supplement vitamin D (107232). During the 5 years immediately after menopause, calcium supplementation has very little effect on bone loss (2569,2570,2575,2576). The rapid loss of estrogen causes a high bone resorption rate, which increases serum calcium levels and therefore decreases intestinal absorption of calcium (2570). After this period, the typical rate of bone loss is 2% per year (2572,2576). Taking calcium 1000-1600 mg daily as carbonate, citrate, lactate gluconate, or citrate malate salt decreases this rate by 0.25% to 1% annually (977,979,981,2569,2571,2572,2575,2576,2578,6850)(38978,38980,39064). The greatest reductions (1% or more) are seen in the first 1-2 years of supplementation when bone remodeling foci can be filled (2569,2576). After this period, the differences in rate of loss between supplemented and non-supplemented females are closer to 0.25% per year (2569,2577). A meta-analysis of clinical evidence suggests that there is no additional benefit after 4 years (38980). Small clinical studies have found that continuous calcium supplementation at an average daily dose of 1050 mg, started after menopause and continued for 1.5-4 years, may reduce fracture rates by 26% when compared with no calcium supplementation. The largest of these studies was conducted in nursing home residents who also received daily vitamin D; the benefits of calcium, specifically, are unclear (39386). Some research also suggests that calcium and vitamin D improves primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in some older individuals with osteoporosis, particularly the elderly and those who are no longer community dwelling (12930,38875,38849,39026,109471). However, not all research is positive. One large clinical trial in elderly adults with a low-trauma fracture show that taking calcium 1000 mg daily with or without vitamin D 800 IU daily for 2-7 years does not reduce the risk of a second fracture when compared with placebo (13073). Another clinical study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 800 IU daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (less than 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). Also, some exploratory research suggests that supplements may need to be continued indefinitely; in adults over 68 years of age, any effects of 2 years of calcium supplements on BMD appear to be lost within 2 years after discontinuing supplements (6853). Calcium has additive effects when used with other agents such as vitamin D, estrogens, or calcitonin. Whereas calcium alone generally reduces or prevents loss of BMD, combination with other agents can produce small increases in BMD ranging from 0.3% to 3.3% depending on the combination and dosages used (978,980,1836,2570,2571,2572,2576). However, one meta-analysis in healthy adults shows that fortifying foods with calcium 250-1000 mg daily, in conjunction with vitamin D supplementation, for up to 24 months does not improve BMD when compared with control (107232). The full potential of osteoporosis treatments cannot be realized without adequate calcium intake (2569,2570,2571,2572). Advise patients taking agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene (Evista) to ensure that their daily calcium intake meets the RDA. Use supplements if necessary. The usefulness of calcium in preventing osteoporosis in males is not as well-studied. Some observational research has found that calcium 870 mg daily is not associated with changes in BMD and bone loss in males (97201). However, clinical evidence suggests that taking calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years might improve trabecular or cortical bone mass by 2% to 4% (980,8827,8873). Dietary supplementation with calcium and vitamin D seems to moderately reduce bone loss measured in the femoral neck, spine, and total body, and seems to reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in older patients with osteopenia or low BMD (980).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Adequate calcium intake seems to prevent symptoms of PMS. Details: There seems to be a link between low dietary calcium intake and symptoms of PMS (2004,6847,39007). Taking calcium 1000-1336 mg daily seems to significantly reduce depressed mood, water retention, and pain, especially if daily calcium intake is inadequate (1822,1823,1824,2004,95821). Calcium carbonate 1200 mg daily seems to decrease PMS symptom scores by about 18% when compared with placebo (1822). Increasing dietary calcium intake is also associated with a decreased risk of developing PMS. Consuming an average of 1283 mg of calcium per day from foods is associated with about a 30% lower risk of developing PMS compared with consuming an average of 529 mg daily (13094); however, taking calcium supplements does not appear to be associated with the risk of developing PMS.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Oral calcium seems to be beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer, especially in those with adequate vitamin D levels and normal body mass index (BMI). Details: Population studies have found that increased intake of dietary or supplemental calcium is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas (1047,8820,12120,38951,98898,98899). Clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research also show that taking calcium supplements 1.2-2 grams daily for up to 4 years can reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence by up to 29% (970,12118,12950,15267,34596,38718,39042,95817). However, not all research has been positive. Some meta-analyses of clinical research or observational studies suggest that taking calcium does not reduce the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer (34596,39042,39349). Other contradictory research suggests that postmenopausal females who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290); however, this finding may not be reliable due to the high baseline intake of calcium in study participants. The reason for these conflicting findings is not entirely clear. Vitamin D might be an important factor. People with lower than average vitamin D levels do not seem to get any benefit from calcium supplements (12118). Also, one meta-analysis of previous trials suggests that taking calcium 1200 mg daily reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas in people with a normal BMI, but not in those who are overweight or obese (99715). Despite this conflicting evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2005 stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence to support this claim (102366).
• Fetal bone mineralization. If calcium intakes are low during pregnancy, oral calcium seems to be beneficial for increasing fetal bone density. Details: With low dietary calcium intake (less than 562 mg elemental calcium daily) during pregnancy, calcium supplementation increases fetal bone mineralization and density. However, calcium supplementation does not offer any additional benefit if calcium intakes are adequate (3263,3264).
• Hypertension. Oral calcium seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount. However, it is unclear if this reduction is clinically significant. Details: Many clinical trials and observational studies show that intake of calcium supplements or dietary calcium modestly reduces blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension, usually around 1-2 mmHg. Calcium seems to be more effective for certain subpopulations of patients, such as salt-sensitive people and patients with low baseline dietary calcium intake (945,972,974,976,984,1818,1819,1820,1821,6852)(13138,14406,38803,39063,39094,39221). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium intake during pregnancy reduces systolic blood pressure in offspring by 1-2 mmHg (38852). However, a large-scale clinical trial in postmenopausal females shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg daily does not lower blood pressure or reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials shows that taking calcium in combination with vitamin D for up to 7 years has no effect on blood pressure (98861). The validity of this finding is limited by the poor methodological quality of the included studies. Some observational research suggests that calcium can reduce the risk for hypertension. Population research in females aged 45 years and older suggests that higher intake of calcium from both diet and supplement sources is linked to a lower risk of developing hypertension when compared to lower calcium intake (14265). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension. However, the FDA has concluded that this claim is based on supporting, rather than conclusive, evidence (102367).
• Osteomalacia. Oral calcium seems to reverse osteomalacia caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Osteomalacia is commonly caused by vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to osteomalacia in children and adults. Calcium supplementation can reverse osteomalacia caused by calcium deficiency. Along with appropriate vitamin D supplementation, individuals at risk of osteomalacia need sufficient calcium intake (94819).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral calcium seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia in high risk pregnancies, especially if calcium intakes are low. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (971,38756), most clinical research shows that taking calcium orally 1-2 grams daily reduces pregnancy-related hypertension and pre-eclampsia (973,1833,8828,39043,39319,39426,96480). Calcium appears to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia by about 50% when compared with placebo. One meta-analysis of 19 controlled trials involving over 29,000 pregnancies found that for every 19 females treated with calcium, one episode of pre-eclampsia would be avoided (96480). Calcium appears to have the greatest effect in individuals at high-risk of pre-eclampsia or with low calcium levels, and when taken at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation (15029,38497,96480,99714). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding the use of calcium supplements to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. However, due to the limited and conflicting research available at that time, the FDA stated that this outcome was highly unlikely. Since then, large, high-quality clinical research has supported this finding. In fact, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released a recommendation to prescribe oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancies at high risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary calcium intakes are low, in order to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).
• Rickets. Oral calcium seems to reverse rickets caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Rickets is commonly caused be vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to rickets. Calcium supplementation can reverse rickets caused by calcium deficiency (94819). A small clinical study in children with nutritional rickets shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily for 24 weeks improves radiographically measured rickets caused by calcium deficiency. Rickets seems to improve more rapidly with calcium 1000 mg compared to calcium 500 mg. However, increasing the calcium dose to 2000 mg daily is not more beneficial than calcium 1000 mg daily (98904).
• Tooth retention. Oral calcium with vitamin D seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral calcium does not seem to be beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Although some population research disagrees (15631,39041,95811,107237), most research shows that increased calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (15631,16715,98895,107236,107237). Subgroup analyses of population research suggest that calcium intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, adults (15631,107237). Another subgroup analysis in a large meta-analysis of population research also suggests that dietary intake may reduce estrogen receptor(ER)-negative breast cancer, but not ER-positive breast cancer (107236). However, most other research has not evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation or intake on breast cancer subtypes. The best evidence to date, from a large scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years after menopause does not reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer at the end of the study and 5 years after the end of the intervention (16715,98895).
• Fractures. Although oral calcium prevents fractures in osteoporosis, most evidence shows that calcium does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis discussion for more information on the use of calcium for this purpose. Details: The most recent and robust meta-analysis of clinical research shows that calcium supplementation with or without vitamin D is NOT associated with reduced fractures in older adults without osteoporosis (95822). A large-scale study in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years suggests calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D 400 IU daily for 7 years only modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) and does not significantly reduce fracture risk. This lack of effect may have been due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. In those who were 80% adherent, the combination of calcium plus vitamin D reduced the risk of hip fracture by about 29% (14282). Also, some clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 5 years does not attenuate loss of height after menopause when compared with placebo (95810). Additional meta-analyses of clinical and observational evidence suggest that calcium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, such as hip fractures (38589,38888,98895). Some other research has suggested that calcium in combination with vitamin D reduces fracture risk in older patients without osteoporosis (980,1836,8818,12930,12933,12952,38849,102145,107235); however, this research is confounded by a number of variables, including the presence of hormonal therapy and differing levels of fracture risk at baseline (1836,8818,95822). Conflicting findings on this topic might also be due to genetic differences in patient populations. A population analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study found that, in older females with the lowest genetic susceptibility to low bone mineral density (BMD), taking calcium with vitamin D is associated with a reduction in fracture risk. However, in females with a higher genetic susceptibility to low BMD, there is no association between supplementation and fracture risk. This might be because individuals with a lower susceptibility to low BMD are also more responsive to calcium and vitamin D supplementation (97357). As of April 2018, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with vitamin D >400 IU daily along with calcium >1000 mg daily is safe and effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture. USPSTF recommends against supplementing with calcium 1000 mg daily or less along with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal females (95695).
• Obesity. Oral calcium does not seem to improve weight loss. Details: Observational research has found that adults and children with low calcium intake are more likely to gain weight, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and be overweight or obese when compared to people with high calcium intake (12124,12125,12126,12127,14265). Additional observational research has found that increasing calcium intake is associated with weight loss in females; the results in males have been conflicting (12127,15602,15603). Despite these findings from observational research and a few small clinical studies (12128,15397,14438,98905), most clinical research has found that increased calcium intake does not increase weight loss (12052,13138,15396,15399,38985,39004,97356). The most recent meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies shows that daily dietary and supplemental calcium intake that meets the dietary reference intake (DRI) of 1000 mg or more daily does not increase weight loss in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when compared with intake below the DRI (95813). An older meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials also shows that increased dietary and supplemental calcium intake does not increase weight loss (15605).
• Overall mortality. Oral calcium does not seem to reduce overall mortality. Details: While some population research has found that calcium taken in combination with vitamin D in older females is associated with a lower risk of death (97353), most evidence shows that calcium, with or without vitamin D, has no effect on all-cause mortality (93533,97308).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral calcium does not reduce the risk of developing CVD and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Clinical research shows that calcium does not decrease CVD risk. Several separate meta-analyses of clinical and population research involving over 50,000 patients show that taking calcium 600-1200 mg daily for up to 7 years does not reduce the risk of CVD-related outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or overall mortality (39018,91350,92994,93533,97308,98902,107231,107233). No association was found between total dietary or supplemental calcium intake with or without vitamin D and the risk of CVD or mortality (91350,93533,97308). In fact, some population and clinical research has found that when calcium is used alone or with vitamin D, there is an INCREASED risk of CVD and coronary heart disease (38077,107233). However, other clinical research disagrees (93533). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease by 1.1-1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Intravenous calcium does not prevent nerve pain in patients given oxaliplatin. Oral calcium has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: While pooled analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials suggest that calcium and magnesium infusion decreases the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials shows that the infusion has no effect in preventing neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). Additionally, clinical trials show that administering calcium gluconate 1 gram with magnesium sulfate 1 gram intravenously immediately before, or before and after, the administration of a single oxaliplatin cycle (90005), or over the entire 6-cycle course of oxaliplatin, does not improve symptoms of neurotoxicity when compared with placebo (96474).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral calcium does not prevent MI. When taken in the absence of vitamin D, oral calcium may increase the risk of MI. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of calcium is associated with a decreased risk of MI (91350). However, a 2010 meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking calcium at a dose of at least 500 mg daily is associated with an approximate 30% INCREASE in the risk of MI in patients over the age of 40. According to this analysis, one additional case of MI will occur for every 69 patients that take calcium for 5 years (17482). A more recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of MI by 1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research studied postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233) In contrast, other meta-analyses of clinical research have shown that taking calcium for up to 7 years is NOT associated with an increased risk of MI, including a meta-analysis that only included postmenopausal females (93533,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI in postmenopausal females (93533). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for alcohol use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 800 mg and vitamin D 200 IU orally daily for 14 days modestly reduces alcohol craving scores and withdrawal scores when compared with placebo in adults with alcohol dependence that are undergoing withdrawal. Taking calcium carbonate did not reduce the need for diazepam; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (107234).
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for atherosclerosis. Details: A population study has found that taking calcium 1.2 grams daily for 3 years has no effect on carotid intima thickness or carotid atherosclerosis incidence. A total calcium intake (dietary and supplemental) of at least 1794 mg daily in older females may be associated with a decreased risk of carotid atherosclerosis when compared with a total calcium intake below 1010 mg daily (97351).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the odds of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. Details: A small observational study found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a 52% reduced odds of an autism spectrum disorder in the offspring (98900).
• Cancer. Oral calcium alone does not seem to prevent cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Taking calcium alone does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of cancer (12118,15629). The role of calcium in cancer prevention when taken along with vitamin D is controversial, as conflicting results exist. One clinical trial shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1400-1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1100 IU daily have a 60% lower relative risk for developing cancer of any type. Approximately 25 postmenopausal females would need to take this combination for 4 years to prevent one occurrence of cancer (15629). However, a more recent clinical study shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of cancer at 4 years (93943). Reasons for the disparate results are not entirely clear. The discrepancies do not appear to be related to baseline vitamin D levels or different study populations. It is possible that, given the 10-year time lapse between the two publications, the discrepancies result from differences in cancer detection capability. Also, since cancer risk was a secondary outcome measure in the earlier study and a primary outcome measure in the more recent study, it is possible that the discrepancies result from differences in statistical methodologies. The effect of vitamin D and calcium on cancer risk in males and younger patients is not known. There is also interest in using calcium for reducing the risk of hematological malignancies. An analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU for up to 10 years is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of hematologic malignancies when compared with placebo. However, no effect on hematologic malignancy related mortality was seen (97354).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between a higher dietary intake of calcium and the risk of depression when compared with a lower dietary intake of calcium (96480).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for type 2 diabetes prevention. Details: Some population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet or supplements, alone or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713,96473). However, population research is often limited by confounding variables. For example, one analysis found that any beneficial effect might be influenced by concomitant magnesium intake (96473). Furthermore, other population research has found that serum calcium levels higher than 9.6 mg/dL are associated with greater risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults with osteoporosis. This study is limited because it was not determined whether increased serum calcium was due to increased calcium intake or another factor such as parathyroid function (95815).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing pain associated with dysmenorrhea. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg with vitamin D 5000 IU daily for three menstrual cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (95821). However, calcium carbonate 1000 mg taken alone seems to reduce pain when compared with placebo.
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but dietary calcium does not seem to have any effect (38893).
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing falls. Details: Research suggests that calcium in combination with vitamin D, but not calcium alone, might prevent falls by decreasing body sway and normalizing systolic blood pressure (6362,11939,39038). Some experts think the combination of calcium and vitamin D may be important (11916). Preliminary clinical research in adults residing in a health care facility shows that taking vitamin D supplements while increasing dietary calcium and protein for 2 years reduces falls by 11% when compared with standard diets. Intervention diets were supplemented with milk, yogurt, and cheese to provide calcium 1142 mg and protein 69 grams daily (107235). There might also be different effects in females compared to males. In one study, females aged 65 years or older who took vitamin D 700 IU plus calcium citrate 500 mg daily over a 3-year period had a 46% lower risk of falling. However, this combination did not decrease falls in males (14291).
• Fluorosis. Oral calcium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking calcium orally, in combination with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and vitamin D, seems to be effective for reducing excessive fluoride levels in children and improving symptoms of fluorosis in children aged 6-12 years (990).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral calcium in combination with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing heart failure. Details: Based on a secondary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), taking calcium 1000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily does not reduce the risk of heart failure in the overall population or in individuals at high risk. However, in a subgroup of postmenopausal females without risk factors for heart failure, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of developing heart failure by about 37% (97307).
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for hypercholesterolemia. Details: Some evidence shows that taking calcium carbonate 400 mg three times daily reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4% and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 4% after 6 weeks of treatment when used in combination with a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) (2557). In contrast, a study in females with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 800 mg daily for 2 years might INCREASE total cholesterol levels by about 12 mg/dL when compared with placebo. This same study showed an association between calcium supplementation and an increase in total cholesterol levels and carotid intimal thickness in postmenopausal females, but not premenopausal females (97350). A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials which included both healthy patients and patients with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily and vitamin D 200-7142 IU daily modestly improves HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplementation is more effective in patients with dyslipidemia at baseline. It is unclear if this effect is due to calcium, vitamin D, or the combination (107227). However, other research shows that taking a specific supplement containing calcium 600 mg plus vitamin D 200 IU (Caltrate 600 D, Wyeth Consumer Healthcare Inc.) twice daily in combination with calorie restriction does not reduce total or LDL cholesterol levels when compared with placebo (15601).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing blood levels of lead. Details: Lead is mobilized along with calcium from bone during pregnancy and lactation, resulting in increased serum concentrations of lead. One clinical study suggests that calcium supplementation does not significantly decrease these elevated lead concentrations (1586). However, another clinical study suggests that taking calcium reduces blood lead levels by 11% when compared with placebo, with greatest effects observed in those with high baseline levels of lead (38957).
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral calcium for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of calcium for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium alone or with vitamin D is beneficial for metabolic syndrome prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet and supplements alone, or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713).
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing nephrotic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium 500-1000 mg daily for 3 months in combination with vitamin D3 60,000 IU daily or weekly for 4 weeks has no effect on bone mineral density or the risk of relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (97355).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking calcium alone or with vitamin D3 1000 IU daily reduced the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but had no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma (104622).
• Oral mucositis. When used in combination with fluoride treatments, a calcium phosphate mouth rinse seems to prevent and reduce mucositis-related pain in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that using a particular mouth rinse (Caphosol, EUSA Pharma) containing calcium phosphate, in combination with fluoride treatments, reduces days of mucositis, the duration of pain, and the dose and days of morphine used when compared with placebo and fluoride treatment (38611).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: An older meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (38792). However, a more recent pooled analysis of 15 cohort and case-control studies has found that the highest intake of dietary or dairy calcium is associated with a 20% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared to the lowest intake (97349).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing postpartum depression risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium 2 grams daily beginning at 11-21 weeks gestation reduces depression at 12 weeks postpartum when compared with placebo. However, no benefit is seen at 6 weeks postpartum (39447).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing leg cramps during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking calcium 1 gram twice daily (as a mixture of salts) for 2 weeks can reduce pregnancy-related leg cramps during the second half of pregnancy when compared with no treatment (2567).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily might decrease the risk of developing prostate cancer (14133). However, some epidemiological research suggests that consuming very high doses of calcium, over 2000 mg daily, might actually increase the risk of developing prostate cancer (14134). Some epidemiological research also suggests that doses greater than 1500 mg daily increase the risk of poorly differentiated, clinically advanced, and fatal prostate cancer (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer (98894). However, contradictory research suggests that there is no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall risk of prostate cancer (14131,14132,104630).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Some population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke (4822,38678). However, other population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is not associated with a decreased risk of stroke (91350). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years does not affect the risk of stroke when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females, and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Vertigo. Oral calcium with vitamin D might reduce positional vertigo; the effect of calcium when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking calcium 500 mg and vitamin D 400 IU twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate calcium for these uses.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral garcinia is beneficial for improving athletic performance. Details: Two very small, exploratory studies in untrained females and in elite athletes show that taking hydroxycitric acid (HCA), the active ingredient of garcinia, 250 mg daily for 5 days increases time to exhaustion and lowers the respiratory exchange ratio when compared with taking placebo (19151,26858).
• Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear if oral garcinia is beneficial in patients with hyperlipidemia. Details: A small open-label study of adults with obesity shows that taking garcinia 600 mg twice daily for 3 months may reduce total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglycerides when compared to baseline (111243). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of a comparator group and blinding.
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral garcinia is beneficial in patients with NAFLD. Details: A small clinical study in females with obesity and NAFLD shows that taking a specific product containing garcinia bark leaf extract (HCA Garcinia Vita Plus, Vitamin House) 312.5 mg daily for 8 weeks in combination with a calorie-restricted diet improves body weight, body mass index (BMI), triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol when compared to baseline. However, liver enzyme levels increased slightly (111240). While a calorie-restricted control group was included, a lack of appropriate statistical comparison limits the validity of any between-group findings. Thus, it is unclear if these results are due to garcinia, the calorie-restricted diet, or the combination.
• Obesity. Despite contradictory evidence, oral garcinia seems to produce a very modest weight reduction in some people who are obese or overweight. Details: A meta-analysis of 8 small clinical trials shows that taking garcinia for 8-12 weeks seems to reduce weight by about 1.3 kg and body mass index (BMI) by about 1 kg/m2 when compared with control (104432). This analysis is limited by prominent heterogeneity in the included studies and a lack of sensitivity analyses. Most studies included in the analyses used garcinia 1000-4667 mg (standardized to 50% or 60% hydroxycitric acid) in divided doses daily as non-branded extracts or as specific branded supplements (Super CitriMax, InterHealth Nutraceuticals; Citrin, Sabinsa Corporation) (728,19152,19153,88158,104432). It is unclear which dose, if any, may be most beneficial. More recently, a small, open-label trial in adults with obesity shows that taking garcinia 600 mg twice daily for 3 months reduces body weight and BMI by 1.7 kg and 0.7 kg/m^2 when compared to baseline (111243). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of a comparator group and blinding. Limited research has also studied garcinia in combination with glucomannan for 6 months, with evidence of moderate benefit for weight loss (96536). More evidence is needed to rate garcinia for these uses.

(Read more about GARCINIA)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Coronary heart disease (CHD). A diet high in soluble fiber, such as that found in oats, reduces the risk of CHD. Details: Clinical research shows that a diet containing foods high in fiber, such as oats, oat bran, or whole oat flour, reduces the risk of CHD (2737,4960,4962,4963,4964,4965,4966,4967,4968). In 1993, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a health claim stating that consuming at least 3 grams of soluble fiber per day, as part of a diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol, may reduce the risk of CHD (102336). However, clinical studies show that at least 3.6 grams of soluble fiber daily is needed to reduce the risk of CHD (5786,5787,5788,5794,5795,5796).
• Hypercholesterolemia. A diet rich in soluble fiber, such as that found in oats, can reduce cholesterol by a moderate amount. Details: Oats, oat bran, and other soluble fibers can modestly reduce total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when consumed as part of a diet low in saturated fat. Consuming 56-150 grams of whole oat products such as oatmeal and oat bran, containing 3.6-10 grams of soluble fiber daily, can significantly lower total and LDL cholesterol levels. For each gram of soluble fiber consumed, total cholesterol decreases by about 1.4 mg/dL and LDL by about 1.2 mg/dL. Eating 3-10 grams of soluble fiber daily can reduce total cholesterol by about 4-14 mg/dL (4976,4977,5786,5788,5792,5794,5795,8521,107749); however, doses greater than 10 grams daily don't seem to increase effectiveness (5788). Eating three bowls of oatmeal (28 gram servings) daily can decrease total cholesterol by about 5 mg/dL (4972,4973,4974,4975,4976,4977,5786,5788,6188). Oat bran products, such as oat bran muffins and oat bran flakes, may vary in their ability to lower cholesterol, depending on the total soluble fiber content and other dietary variables (6188). Whole oat products might be more effective for lowering LDL and total cholesterol than foods containing oat bran plus soluble fiber (10145).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Diabetes. A diet rich in whole grains, such as oats, may help prevent diabetes or improve blood glucose control in patients with type 1, type 2, or gestational diabetes. Details: Population research shows that for every 16 gram daily serving of whole grains, including oats, there is a 7% to 11% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes (100622). There is also evidence that consuming oats can decrease blood glucose and insulin levels, as well as lipid levels, in patients with diabetes. The glycemic effects of oats depend on the level of processing of the oat products. Consuming intact oat kernels or thick-cut oats (>0.6 mm) reduces postprandial blood glucose and insulin, but consuming thin-cut, or "quick", oats has no effect (105536). Clinical research shows that consuming oats and oat bran for 4-8 weeks decreases pre-prandial blood glucose, 24-hour plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin levels, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in people with type 2 diabetes (4980,4982,6266,103345). Various doses have been used, including 3 grams of soluble fiber daily, or bread providing 34 grams of total fiber daily (9 grams of soluble fiber) (4961,4980). Additional clinical research in obese adults with type 2 diabetes shows that eating whole grain oats 50-100 grams daily in place of other carbohydrates reduces postprandial blood glucose by 19-27 mg/dL when compared with other carbohydrates in a healthy diet. After 1 year, the groups consuming 50 grams and 100 grams of oats had an additional 0.48% and 0.64% reduction in HbA1c, respectively, when compared with the regular healthy diet group (97520). There is also some evidence that consuming oats 50 grams daily, containing 25 grams of soluble fiber, might be more effective for improving glycemic control and decreasing hyperinsulinemia than the standard moderate fiber diet recommended by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) (6266). Oats have also been evaluated in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. One very small clinical study shows that taking 50 grams of a specific oat product (Betaglucare), providing beta-glucans 6 grams, in three divided doses daily for one week is beneficial for glycemic control and variability when compared with a standard diet without beta-glucans or with taking only 25 grams of the product daily. Maximal, mean, and pre- and post-meal blood glucose levels were modestly lower, and minimal blood glucose levels were modestly higher. Most measures of glycemic variability were statistically different, although there were no differences in the duration of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia between groups (105261). Oats have also been evaluated in patients with gestational diabetes. A randomized, controlled trial shows that taking 30 grams of a specific oat bran product (OAB; Golden Light Cup Company) orally twice daily at lunch and dinner for 4 weeks improves mean fasting blood glucose and two-hour postprandial glucose when compared with a control group. After 4 weeks, the mean fasting blood glucose and 2-hour postprandial glucose in the treatment group were 85 mg/dL and 104 mg/dL, respectively, compared with 93 mg/dL and 117 mg/dL, respectively, in the control group (107751). The validity of this study is limited by the short treatment duration and lack of follow-up.
• Gastric cancer. A diet rich in soluble fiber, such as that found in oats, might reduce the risk of gastric cancer. Details: Observational research has found that consuming a diet that includes cereal fiber, such as oats and oat bran, might reduce the incidence of gastric cancer (10435).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Regular consumption of oats does not seem to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer. Details: Observational research has found that consuming oat bran or oats orally doesn't seem to reduce the risk of colon cancer. Additionally, consuming fiber, including oat-bran fiber, is not associated with a reduction in the risk for recurrence of colorectal adenomas (4820,5104).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Although there is interest in using topical oats for acne, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose.
• Anxiety. Although there is interest in using oral oats for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Topical colloidal oatmeal cream may be beneficial in patients with atopic dermatitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a cream containing colloidal oatmeal 1% daily for 2 weeks has a moderate effect on the severity of atopic dermatitis when compared with baseline (103344). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Other research suggests that colloidal oatmeal may be beneficial when used in combination with topical steroids. Clinical research shows that the benefits obtained from applying an ointment containing fluocinolone 0.025% to the hands for 2 weeks were better maintained in the patients who also used a cream containing colloidal oatmeal 1% during this time period and for an additional 4 weeks when compared with patients using fluocinolone and the cream base without colloidal oatmeal. Quality of life was also improved in the patients using colloidal oatmeal (103340).
• Breast cancer. Observational research suggests that regular oatmeal intake may be associated with reduced mortality from breast cancer. Details: Population research in postmenopausal patients has found that those who have eaten 50 grams of oatmeal daily prior to a breast cancer diagnosis have a 20% reduced risk of all-cause mortality in the 7 years following the diagnosis when compared with patients who have not eaten oatmeal. However, no benefit was seen when post-diagnostic oatmeal intakes were examined (103343).
• Burns. Although there is interest in using topical oats for burns, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there is interest in using oral oats for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose.
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral oats are beneficial in healthy adults with mild memory impairment. Details: Preliminary clinical research in healthy middle-aged adults with self-reported memory decline shows that consuming a specific wild green-oats extract (Neuravena, Frutarom) 800 mg as a single dose improves overall speed, but not overall accuracy, of cognitive performance when compared with placebo. However, a higher dose of 1600 mg was ineffective (97519).
• Dry skin. It is unclear if applying lotion containing colloidal oat extract improves dry skin to a greater extent than other lotion products. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a lotion containing colloidal oat extract (Aveeno Active Naturals Skin Relief 24Hr Moisturizing Lotion, Johnson & Johnson) twice daily for 2 weeks improves itchiness, cracking, scaling, dryness, and roughness when compared to baseline in females with dry skin (91458). Additional preliminary clinical research shows that applying a colloidal oatmeal lotion to the legs twice daily for three weeks reduces skin dryness and improves skin integrity when compared to baseline in adults with dry skin (97518). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral oats are beneficial for exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: A small clinical trial shows that eating two cookies containing oat flour 60 grams daily for 8 weeks reduces muscle soreness 48 or 72 hours after downhill running when compared with baseline (103341).
• Fat redistribution syndrome. It is unclear if oral oats are beneficial for fat redistribution syndrome. Details: Consumption of a high fiber diet, including oats, with adequate energy and protein might prevent fat deposition in patients with HIV. A one-gram increase in total dietary fiber may decrease the risk of fat deposition by 7% (12517).
• Gallbladder disease. Although there is interest in using oral oats for gallbladder disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral oats are beneficial for hypertension. Details: Observational research has found that consumption of oats as oatmeal or oat cereal does not seem to reduce diastolic blood pressure (DBP) or systolic blood pressure (SBP) in males with minor elevations in blood pressure (2956). A randomized, controlled trial in patients with stage 1 hypertension receiving dietary guidance shows that taking 30 grams of oat bran, providing 8.9 grams of dietary fiber, once daily with breakfast or in between meals for 3 months improves various blood pressure measures when compared with dietary guidance alone. After 3 months of treatment, 24-hour maximum SBP and DBP decreased by 14 mmHg and 11 mmHg, respectively, and office SBP and DBP decreased by 15 mmHg and 10 mmHg, respectively. Oat consumption may also have impacted antihypertensive medication use. Two patients in the control group increased doses of antihypertensive medications, whereas 6 patients in the treatment group decreased doses and 1 patient discontinued use (107750). The effect of oral oat bran on patients with stage 2 hypertension or pre-hypertension is unknown.
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Although there is interest in using oral oats for IBS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose.
• Metabolic syndrome. Limited research suggests that oats may not be beneficial for metabolic syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with metabolic syndrome shows that adding oat bran 40 grams daily for 6 weeks to a low-calorie diet does not reduce the incidence of metabolic syndrome. Oat bran also does not improve body weight, blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, or blood glucose levels when compared with a low-calorie diet alone in patients with metabolic syndrome (103342).
• Osteoarthritis. Although there is interest in using oral oats for osteoarthritis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this condition.
• Pruritus. Applying oat lotion topically may improve some types of pruritus. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying an oat lotion (Espanol) twice daily for up to 2 weeks can decrease itching intensity by about 20% when compared to baseline in patients with pruritus associated with chronic kidney disease (uremic pruritus). This decrease is similar to the effects of applying vinegar 5% solution or taking hydroxyzine 10 mg orally. However, applying the oat lotion does not appear to decrease the frequency of itching (91457).
• Psoriasis. Although there is interest in using topical oats for psoriasis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose.
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although there is interest in using oral oats for RA, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose.
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral oats are beneficial for reducing the risk of stroke. Details: Population research suggests that consuming oatmeal for breakfast once weekly might reduce the incidence of stroke by a small amount when compared with consuming white bread or eggs for breakfast (103337).
• Ulcerative colitis. Oral oats have only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; their effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific oat-based product (Profermin, Nordisk Rebalance) containing fermented oat flour, Lactobacillus plantarum, barley malt flour, and lecithin, 250 mL orally twice daily for 8 weeks, reduces disease activity and increases remission in about two-fold more patients with relapsing ulcerative colitis, when compared with treatment with a specific nutritional beverage (Fresubin Original, Fresenius Kabi) (90271).
• Wound healing. Although there is interest in using topical oats for wound healing, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate oats for these uses.

(Read more about OATS)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (7555,12928,12946,95817). However, excessive doses should be avoided. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: Age 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51+ years, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stone, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). Also, advise patients taking calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D (93533).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. The National Academy of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51 years and older, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients to not consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). Also, advise patients taking calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D (93533).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (17506).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (945,1586,3263,3264,17506). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prescribing oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancy to those with low dietary calcium intake to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the same daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age independent of pregnancy status: 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg (17506). Doses over these amounts might increase the risk of neonatal hypocalcemia-induced seizures possibly caused by transient neonatal hypoparathyroidism in the setting of excessive calcium supplementation during pregnancy, especially during the third trimester. Neonatal hypocalcemia is a risk factor for neonatal seizures (97345).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of garcinia extract when used orally. However, there is some concern about liver toxicity. There are numerous case reports of elevated liver enzymes and symptoms of liver toxicity in patients who have taken garcinia alone or in combination with other ingredients for as little as one week. In at least two reports, hepatotoxicity occurred in patients who were taking garcinia alone. Most other reports occurred in patients taking multi-ingredient products (13037,53511,93380,93381,93384,93385,93392,93393,93394,96535)(102544,102545,111241).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about GARCINIA)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in food amounts (4960,4969,5792,5797). Oat bran has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912). Whole grain oats 50-100 grams daily have been used for up to 1 year without serious adverse effects (97520).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used topically and appropriately (12). Lotion containing colloidal oat 1% has been used topically without adverse effects for up to 6 weeks (97518,103340). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of oats when used orally in medicinal amounts.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in food amounts (5792,5797).

(Read more about OATS)

ALUMINUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium citrate might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity. Other types of calcium do not increase aluminum absorption.  Details Calcium citrate can increase the absorption of aluminum when taken with aluminum hydroxide. The increase in aluminum levels may become toxic, particularly in individuals with kidney disease (21631). However, the effect of calcium citrate on aluminum absorption is due to the citrate anion rather than calcium cation. Calcium acetate does not appear to increase aluminum absorption (93006).

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.  Details Advise patients to take bisphosphonates at least 30 minutes before calcium, but preferably at a different time of day. Calcium supplements decrease absorption of bisphosphonates (12937).

CALCIPOTRIENE (Dovonex) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Taking calcipotriene with calcium might increase the risk for hypercalcemia.  Details Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (12938). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with calcium supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Intravenous calcium may decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers; oral calcium is unlikely to have this effect.  Details Intravenous calcium is used to decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers in the management of overdose. Intravenous calcium gluconate has been used before intravenous verapamil (Isoptin) to prevent or reduce the hypotensive effects without affecting the antiarrhythmic effects (6124). But there is no evidence that dietary or supplemental calcium when taken orally interacts with calcium channel blockers (12939,12947).

CEFTRIAXONE (Rocephin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Co-administration of intravenous calcium and ceftriaxone can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys.  Details Avoid administering intravenous calcium in any form, such as parenteral nutrition or Lactated Ringers, within 48 hours of intravenous ceftriaxone. Case reports in neonates show that administering intravenous ceftriaxone and calcium can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys. In several cases, neonates have died as a result of this interaction (15794,21632). So far there are no reports in adults; however, there is still concern that this interaction might occur in adults.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Using intravenous calcium with digoxin might increase the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias.  Details Hypercalcemia increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with digoxin (12940). However, one retrospective analysis of clinical data suggests that intravenous calcium does not increase the risk of dysrhythmias or mortality in patients receiving digoxin (38960).

DILTIAZEM (Cardizem, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, calcium might increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of diltiazem.

DOLUTEGRAVIR (Tivicay) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of dolutegravir.  Details Advise patients to take dolutegravir either 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium carbonate 1200 mg concomitantly with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces plasma levels of dolutegravir by almost 40%. Calcium appears to decrease levels of dolutegravir through chelation (93578).

ELVITEGRAVIR (Vitekta) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of elvitegravir.  Details Advise patients to take elvitegravir either 2 hours before or 2 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium along with elvitegravir can reduce blood levels of elvitegravir through chelation (94166).

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption and effectiveness of levothyroxine.  Details Advise patients to take levothyroxine and calcium supplements at least 4 hours apart. Calcium reduces levothyroxine absorption, probably by forming insoluble complexes (5082). Calcium carbonate supplements reduce effectiveness of levothyroxine in patients with hypothyroidism (5081,5082,6137).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use of calcium and lithium may increase this risk of hypercalcemia.  Details Clinical research suggests that long-term use of lithium may cause hypercalcemia in 10% to 60% of patients (38953). Theoretically, concomitant use of lithium and calcium supplements may further increase this risk.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of quinolone antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral quinolones at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements or calcium-fortified foods. Taking calcium at the same time as oral quinolones can reduce quinolone absorption. Calcium binds to quinolones in the gut (4412,10339,21638,38570).

RALTEGRAVIR (Isentress) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium may reduce levels of raltegravir.  Details Pharmacokinetic research shows that taking a single dose of calcium carbonate 3000 mg along with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily modestly decreases the mean area under the curve of raltegravir, but the decrease does not necessitate a dose adjustment of raltegravir (94164). However, a case of elevated HIV-1 RNA levels and documented resistance to raltegravir has been reported for a patient taking calcium carbonate 1 gram three times daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU three times daily in combination with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 11 months. It is thought that calcium reduced raltegravir levels by chelation, leading to treatment failure (94165).

SOTALOL (Betapace) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of sotalol.  Details Advise patients to separate doses by at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium. Calcium appears to reduce the absorption of sotalol, probably by forming insoluble complexes (10018).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral tetracyclines at least 2 hours before, or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements. Taking calcium at the same time as oral tetracyclines can reduce tetracycline absorption. Calcium binds to tetracyclines in the gut (1843).

THIAZIDE DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Taking calcium along with thiazides might increase the risk of hypercalcemia and renal failure.  Details Thiazides reduce calcium excretion by the kidneys (1902). Using thiazides along with moderately large amounts of calcium carbonate increases the risk of milk-alkali syndrome (hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis, renal failure). Patients may need to have their serum calcium levels and/or parathyroid function monitored regularly.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, use of calcium supplements may increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of verapamil.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, hydroxycitric acid (HCA), the main active ingredient in garcinia, might increase the risk of bleeding when used with antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs.  Details HCA inhibits platelet aggregation in vitro. The inhibitory effect seems to be greater in platelets extracted from diabetic subjects than non-diabetic subjects (26862).

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, hydroxycitric acid (HCA), the main active ingredient in garcinia, might have additive effects with antidiabetes drugs and increase the risk of hypoglycemia.  Details HCA reduces fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels in animal models, theoretically by delaying glucose absorption (26863,26867,26868). This effect has not been reported in humans.

HEPATOTOXIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use with other potentially hepatotoxic drugs might increase the risk of developing liver damage.  Details There have been reports of acute hepatitis with elevated liver enzymes associated with garcinia, when taken alone or in combination with other ingredients (13037,53511,93380,93381,93384,93392,93393,93394,102544,102545). Case reports collected from the Drug Induced Liver Injury Network suggest this risk may be greater in people who carry the HLA B*35:01 allele (108401).

SEROTONERGIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, combining garcinia with other serotonergic drugs might increase the risk of serotonergic side effects, including serotonin syndrome.  Details In one report, a patient experienced serotonin syndrome after taking garcinia extract (60% hydroxycitric acid) 1000 mg daily in combination with escitalopram 20 mg, which had been taken for a year. The patient was switched to sertraline 50 mg daily and again experienced serotonin syndrome (23545).

(Read more about GARCINIA)

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, oats may have additive effects with antidiabetic agents and might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.  Details Consuming oats can decrease blood glucose in patients with diabetes (4980,4982,6266,103345). In those who require insulin, taking oats 100 grams daily for 2 days reduces the insulin dose required to achieve metabolic control (103336).

INSULIN Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Concomitant use of oats and insulin might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.  Details In patients with insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes, taking oats 100 grams daily for 2 days reduces the insulin dose required to achieve metabolic control (103336).

(Read more about OATS)

General ...Orally and intravenously, calcium is well-tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Belching, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, and stomach upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about calciphylaxis and kidney stones.

Cardiovascular ...There has been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these results, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and CVD, CHD, or MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482). To minimize the possible risk of CVD, CHD, or MI, advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). While dietary intake of calcium is preferred over supplemental intake, advise patients who require calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D, as this combination does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI (93533).
Rarely, calcium intake can increase the risk of calciphylaxis, which usually occurs in patients with kidney failure. Calciphylaxis is the deposition of calcium phosphate in arterioles, which causes skin ulcers and skin necrosis. In a case report, a 64-year-old female with a history of neck fracture, sepsis, and ischemic colitis presented with painful leg ulcers due to calciphylaxis. She discontinued calcium and vitamin D supplementation and was treated with sodium thiosulfate and supportive care (95816).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, calcium can cause belching, flatulence, nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, and diarrhea (1824,1843,12950,38803). Although constipation is frequently cited as an adverse effect of calcium, there is no scientific substantiation of this side effect (1824,1843,1844,1845,12950,38978). Calcium carbonate has been reported to cause acid rebound, but this is controversial (12935,12936).

Oncologic ...There is some concern that very high doses of calcium might increase the risk of prostate cancer. Some epidemiological evidence suggests that consuming over 2000 mg/day of dietary calcium might increase the risk for prostate cancer (4825,12949). Additional research suggests that calcium intake over 1500 mg/day might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer and prostate cancer mortality (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a small increase in prostate cancer risk (98894). However, contradictory research suggests no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall prostate cancer risk (14131,14132,104630). More evidence is needed to determine the effect of calcium, if any, on prostate cancer risk.

Renal ...Kidney stones have been reported in individuals taking calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily in combination with vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 4 years (93943).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

General ...Orally, garcinia and its constituent, hydroxycitric acid (HCA), seem to be generally well tolerated in clinical research.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Diarrhea, gastrointestinal discomfort, headache, and nausea.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Garcinia has been linked with cases of hepatotoxicity and liver failure. There have also been rare cases of mania and pancreatitis.

Cardiovascular ...There is a case report of a 48-year-old female who developed acute necrotizing eosinophilic myocarditis (ANEM) after using a garcinia supplement orally for 2. 5 weeks. On admission to hospital, she was hypotensive and had an elevated serum troponin level, progressing to fulminant heart failure, acute kidney failure, and sustained ventricular arrhythmias. She recovered after treatment with extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and high-dose corticosteroids (88160). Although the patient had no prior medical history and was not taking any medications, this cannot conclusively be attributed to garcinia.
When taken orally, a specific formulation of the multi-ingredient product Hydroxycut (Iovate Health Sciences Inc.), which was available until 2009, has been associated with malignant hypertension and hypertensive retinopathy. Hydroxycut contains caffeine, garcinia, gymnema, green tea, glucomannan, guarana extract, and willow bark. The suspected causal agent is caffeine, which is dosed at 600 mg daily if Hydroxycut is taken as recommended; however, the responsibility of the other ingredients cannot be ruled out (16527).

Endocrine ...In one case report, a 56-year-old female with pre-existing diabetes, hepatitis C, and hypertension developed diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and pancreatitis after taking an unknown amount of garcinia and African mango for one month. Upon admission, she presented with altered mental status, elevated serum glucose and lipase, and high anion gap metabolic acidosis. After 3 days of intensive supportive care, the DKA and pancreatitis resolved. The suspected probable causal agent was garcinia; however, African mango cannot be ruled out (97341). There have been at least 3 other cases of acute pancreatitis associated with use of garcinia (unknown dose) for 2 weeks and up to 7 months in adults ages 36-82 years (105056,105058,105071).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, garcinia and its active constituent hydroxycitric acid (HCA) have caused mild and infrequent nausea, diarrhea, and other gastrointestinal symptoms (728,11977,19153,88158,88159).

Hepatic ...Orally, garcinia and its constituent hydroxycitric acid (HCA) might cause liver toxicity. Several cases of acute liver toxicity have been reported in patients taking garcinia supplements (93392,93393,93394,95573,102544,102545,104431,111241). Reported doses of garcinia extract range from 480-1800 mg daily, providing up to 900 mg HCA daily (93392,93394,95573,102544,104431). However, not all experts agree that HCA plays a causal role in the hepatotoxicity associated with garcinia supplements; some suggest other mechanisms may be in play, such as immune-mediated processes (95576,108401). In most cases, patients presented with a hepatocellular pattern of toxicity and symptoms of abdominal pain, coagulopathy, jaundice, and elevated transaminases after taking garcinia for several weeks to several months (93393,93394,95573,102544,102545,104431,108401,111241). In most of these cases, there was no evidence of other natural causes of liver disease, such as viral hepatitis. Some of these patients used acetaminophen at recommended doses for limited durations, suggesting that a potential synergistic effect may occur when multiple hepatotoxic agents are used concomitantly.
The Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network has identified 22 cases (11 moderate; 7 severe) of liver injury from garcinia, with 5 cases occurring with garcinia alone, 16 cases occurring in combination with green tea, and 1 case occurring in combination with ashwagandha. Clinical presentations of liver injury related to garcinia closely resemble green tea-related liver injury. Most patients (82%) presented with a hepatocellular pattern of enzyme elevations. The median age of these case reports was 35 years, 41% identified as Hispanic, and most patients were overweight but not obese. In case reports involving garcinia alone, the carrier frequency on HLAB*35:01 was 60%, which is higher than the carrier frequency found in reports of liver injury due to other supplements (19%) and in population controls (11%). Within 3 months of injury onset, 1 patient required liver transplantation and 1 patient died from liver injury (108401).
There have been at least four cases of liver failure requiring transplantation associated with garcinia supplements (93392,95573,98425,104431). In one case related specifically to garcinia, a 52-year-old female had been taking a combination product (USA Nutra Labs) providing garcinia 1000 mg daily, standardized to 60% HCA. The supplement also provided calcium 50 mg, chromium 200 mcg, and potassium 50 mg. Symptoms started within a few weeks of initiation of the product (93392). In another case, a 34-year-old Hispanic male experienced acute liver failure requiring transplant after taking a specific garcinia product (Garcinia Cambogia 5:1 Extract, Swanson Vitamins) 160 mg three times daily before meals for 5 months (95573). In other reports, one 26-year-old male and one female presented to the emergency room with liver failure after 2-7 months of taking a supplement containing garcinia and green tea, with or without whey protein, Veldt raisin, and coffea arabica (98425,104431).
There have also been numerous cases of acute liver toxicity associated with combination products containing garcinia, such as Hydroxycut (Iovate Health Sciences Inc) (13037,53511,93380,93381,93384,93385,96535,98425,104431). Available until 2009, Hydroxycut contained garcinia, green tea, chromium, caffeine, calcium, potassium, and gymnema. A currently available garcinia-containing combination product called Seryburn Day Triple has also been associated with supplement-induced liver injury. (13037,93380,93381,95570,95572,95575,111241). In most of these cases, patients had elevated levels of liver enzymes without evidence of chronic liver disease. Patients usually developed symptoms within 1-12 weeks of taking the product. The clinical pattern of liver damage was often hepatocellular. Most cases reported altered liver enzyme values including ALT, AST, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, and international normalized ratio. In most cases, symptoms resolved with near normalization of enzyme levels once the garcinia-containing combination product was discontinued (13037,53511,93380,93381,93384,95567,95572,95575,111241).
However, there is one report of transplant related to Hydroxycut use (93381). As the suspected causal agents, garcinia and green tea were removed from the product during reformulation in 2009 (13037,53511,93380,93381,93384). Hepatotoxicity has been reported in at least one new formulation of Hydroxycut not containing garcinia (93394). Consequently, some experts believe that there is not enough information to attribute hepatotoxicity from this product to garcinia or HCA (95576). Also, in some cases, causality of hepatotoxicity was less clear because patients were taking many other supplements and drugs (95570).There is also a report of fatal liver failure in an obese female taking montelukast while also taking two dietary supplements containing multiple ingredients, including garcinia, gymnema, chromium, bitter orange, and many others. The authors speculated that the combination of montelukast with one or more ingredients in these dietary supplements may have resulted in liver failure (93385).

Musculoskeletal ...Orally, garcinia-containing products have been associated with rhabdomyolysis. There is a case report of a patient who developed rhabdomyolysis 3 hours after ingestion of an herbal product containing ephedra, guarana, chitosan, gymnema, garcinia, and chromium (19154). Since there were multiple ingredients, the effect cannot be conclusively attributed to garcinia. Another case of rhabdomyolysis has been reported for a patient taking an undetermined formulation of Hydroxycut at a dose of 4 caplets daily, naproxen sodium 220 mg as needed for pain, dextroamphetamine daily for 5 days, and hydrocodone-acetaminophen and cyclobenzaprine for pain. Two weeks later, after stopping Hydroxycut and receiving supportive care, the rhabdomyolysis resolved. Hydroxycut was determined to be possibly associated with the rhabdomyolysis (95566). Since Hydroxycut contains multiple ingredients and garcinia content was possible but not confirmed, a causal relationship with garcinia could not be determined.

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, garcinia and its active constituent hydroxycitric acid (HCA) may cause headache and dizziness (11977). A 35-year-old female reported ocular complications, headache, dizziness, and nausea after taking garcinia extract, providing more than 500 mg of HCA, three times daily for one week. The patient's neurologic symptoms resolved one day after discontinuing the garcinia extract (102546). It is unclear if these neurologic adverse effects were separate from or related to the patient's visual disturbances.

Ocular/Otic ...In one case, a 35-year-old female presented with ocular pain in both eyes, decreased vision in the left eye, headache, dizziness, and nausea after taking garcinia extract orally for one week. Ophthalmologic testing was consistent with adverse ocular effects, showing myopic shift with anterior chamber shallowing and swelling of retinal nerve fiber and macula. The patient reported taking a garcinia product containing hydroxycitric acid 500 mg three times daily, which was more than double the recommended dose per the product label. Symptoms resolved upon discontinuation of the garcinia extract and treatment with oral and topical steroids (102546).

Psychiatric ...Orally, garcinia supplements have been linked to several cases of mania. Typically, symptoms develop 1-8 weeks after starting garcinia. In a report of three patients, symptoms included reduced need for sleep, increased activities and spending, delusions of grandiosity, pressured speech, and agitation. Two of the patients were previously diagnosed with bipolar disorder, and use of garcinia was believed to precipitate episodes during stable phases of the disease. The third patient had no history of bipolar disorder, and use of garcinia was thought to possibly have unmasked previously undiagnosed primary bipolar disorder. In all three cases, recovery included discontinuation of garcinia (95568). In a separate case report, a 23-year-old male taking a specific combination product containing garcinia (Hydroxycut) 1-2 capsules daily for 1 month presented to the emergency room with mania. The patient had no history of bipolar disorder. Although the patient was started on risperidone and clonazepam, symptoms resolved following discontinuation of the supplement. Treatment was discontinued within 4 days of initiation, and the patient remained asymptomatic (95574). A 22-year-old female with no history of bipolar disorder developed mania and psychosis, presenting 10 days after starting Garcinia Cambogia Plus (Apex Vitality Health) 500-1500 mg daily, and Cleanse and Detox (Apex Vitality Health). The latter supplement contains raspberry ketones, licorice root, pumpkin seed, buckthorn root, Cascara sagrada, Irvingia gabonensis, rhubarb, pectin, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and aloe. Symptoms improved upon stopping the supplements and starting lithium and quetiapine (99421).

(Read more about GARCINIA)

General ...Orally, oats are well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal distension, bloating, flatulence, and unpleasant taste.
Topically: Burning, contact dermatitis, itching, and redness.

Dermatologic ...Topically, oat-containing preparations can cause contact dermatitis (12515). Redness, burning, and itchiness have also been reported (103340).

Gastrointestinal ...When consumed orally, oats provide fiber. Increasing fiber in the diet can cause flatulence, bloating, abdominal distention, and unpleasant taste. To minimize side effects, doses should be slowly titrated to the desired level. These adverse effects usually subside with continued use (12514).
In patients who have difficulty chewing food, or those with conditions that decrease small bowel motility, oat bran may cause bezoars (concretions) and intestinal obstruction. Oats and oat bran are unlikely to cause obstruction without other causative factors (4979,4985).

(Read more about OATS)