MightyZyme by Young Living Essential Oils KidScents

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Diabetes. Although there has been interest in using oral alfalfa for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alfalfa for this purpose.
• Dyspepsia. Although there has been interest in using oral alfalfa for dyspepsia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alfalfa for this purpose.
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral alfalfa seeds are beneficial in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Details: A small, uncontrolled clinical study in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking heat-prepared alfalfa seeds 40 grams three times daily for 8 weeks reduces total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels when compared to baseline (5816). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Menopausal symptoms. Although there has been interest in using oral alfalfa for menopausal symptoms, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alfalfa for this purpose. There is insufficient reliable information available about the effectiveness of alfalfa for its other uses.

(Read more about ALFALFA)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there has been interest in using oral bromelain for allergic rhinitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bromelain for this condition.
• Aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia shows that taking a specific combination product (Opera, Gam Farma), providing bromelain 20 mg, alpha-lipoic acid 240 mg, Boswellia serrata 40 mg, and methylsulfonylmethane 200 mg, daily for 6 months reduces arthralgia symptoms when compared to baseline (109570). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of placebo control group. Further, it is unclear if these findings are due to bromelain, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Burns. Preliminary clinical research shows that topical bromelain is beneficial for burn debridement. However, it is unclear if topical bromelain is beneficial for scar prevention. Details: Preliminary clinical research and chart reviews show that gels formulated with proteolytic enzymes derived from bromelain (Debridase or NexoBrid, MediWound Ltd.) applied under an occlusive dressing for 4 hours help debride burns, including chemical and electrical burns, in children and adults (18275,91113,103297,108149). Further, a meta-analysis of up to 5 lower- to moderate-quality clinical and observational studies in children and adults with deep burns shows that enzymatic debridement with a specific bromelain based proteolytic enzyme gel applied once or twice for a 4 hour period reduces eschar time by approximately 7 days and reduces the relative risk of surgical excision, and autografts by 83%, and 60%, respectively, when compared with standard of care (e.g., surgical and non-surgical procedures) (115870). The validity of these results is limited by significant heterogeneity across clinical studies, including differences in the location of burns and extent of total body surface area affected.
• Cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral bromelain for cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bromelain for this condition.
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy shows that taking a specific product (Opera, Gamfarma s.r.l.) containing bromelain 20 mg, alpha-lipoic acid 240 mg, methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) 200 mg, and boswellia 40 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces overall pain when compared with baseline (96449). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group. Additionally, it is not clear if benefit is due to alpha-lipoic acid, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Chronic venous insufficiency. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: An observational study in adults with chronic venous insufficiency using compression stockings shows that taking a specific supplement containing bromelain dry extract 50-200 mg, Baikal skullcap, and horse chestnut (Lenidase, Enfarma), dose adjusted based on severity, daily for up to 90 days, improves severity of lower extremity symptoms (e.g., inflammation, pain, varicose veins, vessel induration) when compared with the use of compression stockings alone (115869). It is unclear if these benefits are due to bromelain, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Diabetes. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small observational study in patients with a family history of type 1 diabetes found that taking a specific product (Mucos Pharma) containing bromelain 90 mg. rutin 100 mg, and trypsin 48 mg daily for 24 months is not associated with reduced incidence of type 1 diabetes at 8 years (99472).
• Diabetic foot ulcers. Although there has been interest in using topical bromelain for diabetic foot ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bromelain for this condition.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral bromelain is beneficial for preventing exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: One small clinical study shows that taking bromelain 300 mg three times daily, immediately following an intense exercise regimen, does not reduce delayed onset muscle soreness and has no effect on pain, flexibility, or skeletal weakness when compared with either ibuprofen 400 mg three times daily or placebo (10622). However, a small clinical study shows that taking a combination protease tablet containing bromelain 50 mg, trypsin 75 mg, papain 50 mg, amylase 10 mg, lipase 10 mg, lysosome 10 mg, and chymotrypsin 2 mg, four times in one day before downhill running, can improve recovery of contractile muscle function and decrease muscle soreness when compared with placebo (67838). It is unclear if these effects are due to bromelain, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Exercise-induced respiratory infections. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in non-elite male runners shows that taking a combination product (Wobenzym Plus, Mucos Pharma) providing bromelain 540-1080 mg, rutin 600-1200 mg, and trypsin 288-576 mg daily for 3 weeks, starting one week before a marathon, does not reduce the risk of a post-race respiratory tract infection when compared with placebo (96766).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). It is unclear if oral bromelain is beneficial for kidney stone expulsion. Details: Observational research in patients with 4-10 mm kidney stones found that adding bromelain to tamsulosin is associated with a 12% increased rate of spontaneous stone expulsion when compared to tamsulosin alone (100752).
• Knee pain. It is unclear if oral bromelain is beneficial for knee pain. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking bromelain (Bromelin, Lichtwer Pharma Ltd.) orally for 30 days can reduce mild, acute (duration of less than 3 months) knee pain in otherwise healthy patients when compared to baseline. A daily dose of 400 mg seems to be more effective than 200 mg daily for relieving pain, stiffness, and physical function of the knee, with reductions in symptom scores of 59% and 41%, respectively (11457).
• Lymphedema. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Some clinical research in patients who have undergone a mastectomy shows that taking a specific combination product containing bromelain, rutin, pancreatin, papain, trypsin, and chymotrypsin (Wobenzym N, Mucos Pharma) daily for 7 weeks reduces arm swelling associated with lymphedema when compared with diuretics (24560). Other preliminary clinical research in patients with primary or secondary lymphedema of the upper or lower limbs shows that taking a different combination product containing bromelain 100 mg, rutin 300 mg, and sweet clover 100 mg daily for 6 months decreases pitting, limb volume, pain, and quality of life when compared to baseline (103298). The validity of these results is limited by the lack of a control group. Additionally, it is unclear if these findings are due to bromelain, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A preliminary clinical study in patients with relapsing-remitting MS shows that taking an enzyme combination containing bromelain 90 mg, rutin 100 mg, and trypsin 48 mg per tablet for at least 3 months does not affect the progression of disability, relapse rate, or central nervous system lesions when compared with placebo (99468). The validity of these results is limited by the short duration of treatment.
• Ocular floaters. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in patients with spontaneous symptomatic vitreous opacities (ocular floaters) shows that taking oral mixed fruit enzyme capsules containing bromelain 190 mg, papain, and ficin once, twice, or three times daily for 3 months eliminates floaters in 55%, 63%, and 70% of patients, respectively, when compared with an elimination rate of 5% with vitamin C as a control. Additionally, patients with vitreous hemorrhage-induced symptomatic vitreous opacities taking the mixed fruit enzyme capsules 3 times daily for 3 months reduced intraocular blood by 56% and improved visual acuity, but these effects were not found for lower doses and shorter durations when compared with a control (111650). It is unclear if these effects are due to bromelain, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral bromelain is beneficial for osteoarthritis. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking bromelain 800 mg daily for 12 weeks as an adjunctive treatment for moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis is no more effective than placebo for improving symptom scores (18274). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking bromelain 500 mg daily for 4 weeks for mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis is less effective than diclofenac 100 mg daily for improving quality of life, joint pain, and joint function (96216). However, preliminary clinical research shows that oral combination products containing bromelain can reduce pain and improve function in knee osteoarthritis (6252,91104,91106,99467,99477,103299). Bromelain 180 mg has been used in combination with trypsin 144 mg and rutin 200 mg (Phlogenzym, Mucos Pharma GMBH; Wobenzym, Mucos Pharma GmbH) three times daily for 3-12 weeks, with effects comparable to diclofenac, usually taken as 50 mg three times daily for one week, then twice daily thereafter. This product also reduces the need for rescue analgesics by 95% when compared with placebo (6252,91104,99467,99477). Other studies have used a specific combination supplement (AINAT, Laboratoire de Rhumatologie Appliquée) containing Devil's claw 600 mg, turmeric 400 mg, and bromelain 300 mg, taken 2-3 times daily for 2-8 weeks (91106) or a combination of bromelain 250 mg and papain 250 mg (Nature's Life Bromelain & Papain, NutraMarks, Inc.) twice daily, plus aceclofenac 100 mg twice daily for 6 weeks (103299).
• Pain (acute). It is unclear if oral bromelain is beneficial for acute pain. Details: A meta-analysis of 9 small clinical studies in patients experiencing acute pain due to various etiologies shows that taking bromelain slightly improves subjective pain scores and allows patients to open their mouth wider after oral operations when compared with a control (113513).
• Parturition. Although there has been interest in using oral bromelain for shortening the duration of labor, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bromelain for this purpose.
• Periodontitis. It is unclear if oral bromelain is beneficial for periodontitis. Details: A very small clinical study in adults with periodontitis shows that taking bromelain 500 mg (Anaheal) twice daily for one week after undergoing pocket elimination surgery reduces bleeding on probing but does not improve gingival index, plaque index, or probing pocket depth when compared with placebo when assessed five weeks after surgery (111691). The validity of these effects is limited by a very small sample size and inadequate statistical power.
• Pityriasis lichenoides chronica (PLC). It is unclear if oral bromelain is beneficial for PLC. Details: A case series suggests that taking bromelain 40 mg orally three times daily for one month, then twice daily for a second month, then once daily for a third month, helps treat episodes of PLC when compared to baseline (18280).
• Postoperative pain. While evidence is mixed, some small clinical studies suggest that oral bromelain reduces postoperative pain after some oral surgeries. Details: Meta-analyses and clinical research in a small number of patients undergoing wisdom tooth extraction shows that bromelain modestly reduces pain for up to 8 days when compared with control (91109,91110,100750,100751). In contrast, several other small clinical studies show that taking bromelain does not reduce pain after wisdom tooth extraction when compared with placebo (91107,96214,96215). These studies might not have been sufficiently powered to detect a smaller effect. Meta-analyses also suggest that bromelain does not appear to have a significant effect on postoperative swelling or trismus (100750,100751). Additionally, multiple clinical studies in patients undergoing oral procedures, including crown lengthening or root canal surgery, shows that bromelain 160-1500 mg, taken in 2-4 divided doses daily for up to 6 days, reduces dental pain, swelling, and trismus similarly to taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (e.g., ketoprofen, diclofenac sodium, aceclofenac, and ibuprofen) (91109,91110,110546,113898,115871). Bromelain, in combination with other ingredients, has also been evaluated for reducing pain after surgery. Several clinical trials in adults undergoing a variety of surgery types, including facial trauma, hernioplasty, oral surgery, and shoulder surgery, show that taking specific combination products (Siben, Brovas, Tenosan) containing bromelain and other ingredients (e.g., freeze-dried pineapple, methylsulfonylmethane, Boswellia serrata) daily for 1 week to 3 months reduces postoperative pain (19322,114687,115304,115868). However, clinical significance is unclear. Additionally, it is unclear if the effect is due to bromelain, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Postoperative swelling. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small preliminary clinical study in patients undergoing surgery of the jaw shows that taking an enzyme combination of bromelain 180 mg, rutin 200 mg, and trypsin 96 mg twice daily for 5 days in addition to standard treatment reduces soft-tissue thickness (indicating the amount of swelling) at most of the nine assessed facial points when compared to control (99476). Additionally, a moderate-sized, open-label, clinical trial in adults undergoing facial trauma surgery shows that taking 700 mg per day of bromelain combined with sweet clover and horse chestnut (Brovas, Agave Group) postoperatively for 15 days reduces facial edema when compared with control (115304). However, clinical significance of this benefit is uncertain. Additionally, it is unclear if this effect is due to sweet clover, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Rhinosinusitis. It is unclear if oral bromelain is beneficial for rhinosinusitis. Details: Several small clinical trials show that short-term and long-term use of bromelain reduces symptoms of acute and chronic sinusitis, especially nasal mucosal inflammation and edema (18276,18277,18278,18279,91105). The trials used bromelain 40 mg orally (usually the product Ananase) four times daily for six days as an adjunct to antibiotics (18276,18278,18279) or 6 bromelain tablets each containing enzymes of 500 International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) units for 12 weeks (91105). Bromelain is usually taken in combination with decongestants, antihistamines, and/or antibiotics. However, the studies have a number of methodological problems, and results are inconsistent. Bromelain has also been evaluated as part of a combination product. A small study in patients over 12 years old with chronic sinusitis shows that taking a combination product containing bromelain 200 mg, Boswellia serrata, black currant, and vitamin D (Flogostop Forte, Humana Italia S.p.A) 1-2 times daily for 15-30 days as an adjunctive therapy to inhaled corticosteroids modulates hyperemia of the mucosa, rhinorrhea, and local inflammation when compared with inhaled corticosteroids alone and baseline (111501). It is unclear if these findings are due to bromelain, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Sprains. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A preliminary clinical study in patients with a sprained ankle shows that taking a specific enzyme combination (Phlogenzym, Mucos Pharma) containing bromelain 90 mg, trypsin 48 mg, and rutin 100 mg, or taking different combinations of the individual enzymes three times daily for 10 days, is no more effective for relieving pain than placebo (99473).
• Tendinopathy. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with Achilles tendon insertional tendinopathy shows that taking two sachets of a specific supplement (Tenosan, Agave, Prato, Italy) containing a total of bromelain 100 mg, arginine-L-alpha-ketoglutarate 1000 mg, methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) 1100 mg, hydrolyzed collagen type I 600 mg, vitamin C 120 mg, and Vinitrox 25 mg orally for 60 days improves function and pain when compared with placebo (19321).
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial shows that a combination of bromelain 50 mg and trypsin 1 mg (Kimotab, Mochida Pharmaceutical), taken in a dose of 8 tablets daily for 2 days, does not improve subjective symptoms of UTIs when compared with placebo (18282).
• Venous leg ulcers. Although there has been interest in using topical bromelain for venous leg ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bromelain for this condition.
• Wound healing. It is unclear if enzymatic debridement with bromelain improves the healing of various types of chronic wounds. Details: A meta-analysis of 12 small clinical studies shows that topical bromelain reduces time to complete debridement by around 6 days but has no effect on time to healing when compared with a control (113513). However, the validity of these effects is limited by significant publication bias and a small number of studies per outcome. One small clinical study, included in the analysis above, of patients with chronic wounds related to diabetes, surgery, trauma, or venous insufficiency shows that use of bromelain-based enzymatic debridement (EscharEx, MediWound Ltd), administered as up to ten daily applications of 4 hours each, increases the incidence of complete debridement over the next 6 months to 55% of patients, compared with only 29% of those using the bromelain-free gel. However, there was no difference in changes in wound area, non-viable tissue area, or the incidence or time to complete wound closure (108148). More evidence is needed to rate bromelain for these uses.

(Read more about BROMELAIN)

EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Oral calcium carbonate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an antacid. Details: Taking calcium carbonate orally as an antacid is effective for treating dyspepsia (1843). Calcium carbonate has FDA approval as an antacid.
• Hyperkalemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities. Details: Administering calcium gluconate intravenously can reverse electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias induced by hyperkalemia (12946). Intravenous calcium gluconate is FDA-approved for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities.
• Hypocalcemia. Oral calcium treats and prevents hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium is used to treat severe hypocalcemia. Details: Taking calcium orally is effective for treating and preventing hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate, acetate, gluceptate, or chloride is effective for severe hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany (12928).
• Kidney failure. Oral calcium carbonate or calcium acetate is used as a phosphate binder during kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium carbonate or calcium acetate orally is effective as a phosphate binder. Calcium acetate (PhosLo) appears to control hyperphosphatemia better than sevelamer (Renagel) (12943,12944,38990). Calcium citrate is not recommended for this purpose because it increases aluminum absorption and does not bind phosphate as efficiently as calcium acetate or calcium carbonate (21631). Some clinical research also shows that taking calcium orally reduces blood pressure in patients with kidney failure (975).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral calcium in combination with vitamin D prevents bone density loss that occurs during long-term treatment with corticosteroids. Details: Taking calcium in combination with vitamin D as adjunctive therapy seems to be effective for reducing bone mineral density loss in people using corticosteroids long-term (982,1046,1830,1831,1832,4462,4463,4464,4465,4466)(4467,12945,38493). One specific product used in clinical research is Oscal (Marion Merrel Dow Inc.), which contains elemental calcium 500 mg per tablet plus vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (982). Another product used is Oscal 250 + D (SmithKline Beecham Healthcare), which contains elemental calcium 250 mg and vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (1046).
• Hyperparathyroidism. Oral calcium reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium orally reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with kidney failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism (1827,1828,1829,39174,39425). In elderly women, the combination of calcium and vitamin D reverses secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces hip fracture risk (8818). Also, population research suggests increased calcium intake from the diet and supplements reduces the risk of primary hyperparathyroidism in women. Supplemental intakes of at least 500 mg/day and dietary intakes of approximately 1100 mg/day are considered to be protective (91353).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate calcium intake, from the diet and/or supplements, is recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate calcium intake in line with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) by age, along with adequate vitamin D intake, for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake when adequate dietary intake is not feasible (109425). In the US and Canada, foods containing at least 200 mg calcium with less phosphorous content than calcium can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate calcium intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (11940,102148). However, calcium supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Also, calcium supplements do not seem to be effective for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) during lactation (988), in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation (1817), or in patients who have had renal transplantation (4823,38736,38871). Maximal bone growth occurs in the teenage years, and then BMD in females remains relatively constant until age 30-40. After age 40, bone loss typically occurs at rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. In males, this occurs several decades later. Bone loss is more pronounced if dietary calcium intake is below the RDA, which is the case for many Americans (2571,2578). One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy children 7-14 years old shows that fortifying food with calcium 250-1000 mg daily for up to 24 months modestly improves femoral neck BMD, but not hip or spine BMD. However, the included trials did not supplement vitamin D (107232). During the 5 years immediately after menopause, calcium supplementation has very little effect on bone loss (2569,2570,2575,2576). The rapid loss of estrogen causes a high bone resorption rate, which increases serum calcium levels and therefore decreases intestinal absorption of calcium (2570). After this period, the typical rate of bone loss is 2% per year (2572,2576). Taking calcium 1000-1600 mg daily as carbonate, citrate, lactate gluconate, or citrate malate salt decreases this rate by 0.25% to 1% annually (977,979,981,2569,2571,2572,2575,2576,2578,6850)(38978,38980,39064). The greatest reductions (1% or more) are seen in the first 1-2 years of supplementation when bone remodeling foci can be filled (2569,2576). After this period, the differences in rate of loss between supplemented and non-supplemented females are closer to 0.25% per year (2569,2577). A meta-analysis of clinical evidence suggests that there is no additional benefit after 4 years (38980). Small clinical studies have found that continuous calcium supplementation at an average daily dose of 1050 mg, started after menopause and continued for 1.5-4 years, may reduce fracture rates by 26% when compared with no calcium supplementation. The largest of these studies was conducted in nursing home residents who also received daily vitamin D; the benefits of calcium, specifically, are unclear (39386). Some research also suggests that calcium and vitamin D improves primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in some older individuals with osteoporosis, particularly the elderly and those who are no longer community dwelling (12930,38875,38849,39026,109471). However, not all research is positive. One large clinical trial in elderly adults with a low-trauma fracture show that taking calcium 1000 mg daily with or without vitamin D 800 IU daily for 2-7 years does not reduce the risk of a second fracture when compared with placebo (13073). Another clinical study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 800 IU daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (less than 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). Also, some exploratory research suggests that supplements may need to be continued indefinitely; in adults over 68 years of age, any effects of 2 years of calcium supplements on BMD appear to be lost within 2 years after discontinuing supplements (6853). Calcium has additive effects when used with other agents such as vitamin D, estrogens, or calcitonin. Whereas calcium alone generally reduces or prevents loss of BMD, combination with other agents can produce small increases in BMD ranging from 0.3% to 3.3% depending on the combination and dosages used (978,980,1836,2570,2571,2572,2576). However, one meta-analysis in healthy adults shows that fortifying foods with calcium 250-1000 mg daily, in conjunction with vitamin D supplementation, for up to 24 months does not improve BMD when compared with control (107232). The full potential of osteoporosis treatments cannot be realized without adequate calcium intake (2569,2570,2571,2572). Advise patients taking agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene (Evista) to ensure that their daily calcium intake meets the RDA. Use supplements if necessary. The usefulness of calcium in preventing osteoporosis in males is not as well-studied. Some observational research has found that calcium 870 mg daily is not associated with changes in BMD and bone loss in males (97201). However, clinical evidence suggests that taking calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years might improve trabecular or cortical bone mass by 2% to 4% (980,8827,8873). Dietary supplementation with calcium and vitamin D seems to moderately reduce bone loss measured in the femoral neck, spine, and total body, and seems to reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in older patients with osteopenia or low BMD (980).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Adequate calcium intake seems to prevent symptoms of PMS. Details: There seems to be a link between low dietary calcium intake and symptoms of PMS (2004,6847,39007). Taking calcium 1000-1336 mg daily seems to significantly reduce depressed mood, water retention, and pain, especially if daily calcium intake is inadequate (1822,1823,1824,2004,95821). Calcium carbonate 1200 mg daily seems to decrease PMS symptom scores by about 18% when compared with placebo (1822). Increasing dietary calcium intake is also associated with a decreased risk of developing PMS. Consuming an average of 1283 mg of calcium per day from foods is associated with about a 30% lower risk of developing PMS compared with consuming an average of 529 mg daily (13094); however, taking calcium supplements does not appear to be associated with the risk of developing PMS.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Oral calcium seems to be beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer, especially in those with adequate vitamin D levels and normal body mass index (BMI). Details: Population studies have found that increased intake of dietary or supplemental calcium is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas (1047,8820,12120,38951,98898,98899). Clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research also show that taking calcium supplements 1.2-2 grams daily for up to 4 years can reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence by up to 29% (970,12118,12950,15267,34596,38718,39042,95817). However, not all research has been positive. Some meta-analyses of clinical research or observational studies suggest that taking calcium does not reduce the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer (34596,39042,39349). Other contradictory research suggests that postmenopausal females who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290); however, this finding may not be reliable due to the high baseline intake of calcium in study participants. The reason for these conflicting findings is not entirely clear. Vitamin D might be an important factor. People with lower than average vitamin D levels do not seem to get any benefit from calcium supplements (12118). Also, one meta-analysis of previous trials suggests that taking calcium 1200 mg daily reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas in people with a normal BMI, but not in those who are overweight or obese (99715). Despite this conflicting evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2005 stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence to support this claim (102366).
• Fetal bone mineralization. If calcium intakes are low during pregnancy, oral calcium seems to be beneficial for increasing fetal bone density. Details: With low dietary calcium intake (less than 562 mg elemental calcium daily) during pregnancy, calcium supplementation increases fetal bone mineralization and density. However, calcium supplementation does not offer any additional benefit if calcium intakes are adequate (3263,3264).
• Hypertension. Oral calcium seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount in adults with or without hypertension. However, it is unclear if this reduction is clinically significant. Details: Many clinical trials and observational studies, including a meta-analysis of 18 high-quality clinical trials, show that intake of calcium supplements or dietary calcium modestly reduces systolic blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension, usually around 1-2 mmHg. Calcium seems to be more effective for certain subpopulations of patients, such as those who are salt-sensitive or have low baseline dietary calcium intake (945,972,974,976,984,1818,1819,1820,1821,6852)(13138,14406,38803,39063,39094,39221,113920,113925). However, a large-scale clinical trial in postmenopausal females shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg daily does not lower blood pressure or reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials shows that taking calcium in combination with vitamin D for up to 7 years has no effect on blood pressure (98861). The validity of this finding is limited by the poor methodological quality of the included studies. Some observational research suggests that calcium can reduce the risk for hypertension. Population research in females aged 45 years and older suggests that higher intake of calcium from both diet and supplemental sources is linked to a lower risk of developing hypertension when compared to lower calcium intake (14265). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension. However, the FDA has concluded that this claim is based on supporting, rather than conclusive, evidence (102367). Research evaluating the effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on the child's blood pressure has yielded conflicting findings. A systematic review of 2 clinical studies and 3 observational studies found that calcium intake during pregnancy is associated with a 1-2 mmHg reduction in the systolic blood pressure of the offspring between the ages of 1-7 years (38852). However, a separate meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies shows that calcium intake during pregnancy does not reduce systolic or diastolic blood pressure in the offspring (113923).
• Osteomalacia. Oral calcium seems to reverse osteomalacia caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Osteomalacia is commonly caused by vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to osteomalacia in children and adults. Calcium supplementation can reverse osteomalacia caused by calcium deficiency. Along with appropriate vitamin D supplementation, individuals at risk of osteomalacia need sufficient calcium intake (94819).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral calcium seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia, especially in high-risk individuals and those with low baseline dietary calcium intake. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (971,38756), most clinical research shows that taking calcium orally 1-2 grams daily reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia (973,1833,8828,39043,39319,39426,97348,113919). A large clinical trial of 11,000 pregnant individuals in India and Tanzania shows that supplementation with 500 mg daily is similarly effective to 1500 mg daily (113908). Multiple meta-analyses which include 16-30 clinical studies have found that varying doses of calcium supplementation reduce the relative risk of pre-eclampsia by 46% to 51% when compared with placebo (97348,113909,113919). One of these meta-analyses found that for every 19 females treated with calcium, one episode of pre-eclampsia would be avoided (97348). Additionally, one of these meta-analyses found that calcium reduces the relative risk of pre-eclampsia by 51%, regardless of whether it is taken at a dose above or below 1000 mg daily (113919). Some research suggests that calcium supplementation may have a greater effect in individuals at high risk of pre-eclampsia or with low baseline dietary calcium intake, and when taken at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation (15029,38497,97348,99714,113919). However, another meta-analysis of 30 clinical studies found a similar benefit of calcium in both high- and low-risk individuals (113919). A separate meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies conducted in China evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy. This combination was associated with an 80% lower relative risk of pre-eclampsia and an 83% lower relative risk of pre-eclampsia with gestational hypertension when compared with routine care (113913). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding the use of calcium supplements to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. However, due to the limited and conflicting research available at that time, the FDA stated that this outcome was highly unlikely (102366). Since then, large, high-quality clinical research has supported this finding. In fact, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released a recommendation to prescribe oral calcium 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancies at high risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary calcium intakes are low (97347).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. Oral calcium may reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Details: A meta-analysis of 17 clinical studies shows that calcium supplementation during pregnancy may reduce the relative risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension by 30% when compared with control (113909). A separate meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies conducted in China, which evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy, shows that this combination reduces the relative risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension by 85% when compared with routine care (113913).
• Rickets. Oral calcium seems to reverse rickets caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Rickets is commonly caused be vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to rickets. Calcium supplementation can reverse rickets caused by calcium deficiency (94819). A small clinical study in children with nutritional rickets shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily for 24 weeks improves radiographically measured rickets caused by calcium deficiency. Rickets seems to improve more rapidly with calcium 1000 mg compared to calcium 500 mg. However, increasing the calcium dose to 2000 mg daily is not more beneficial than calcium 1000 mg daily (98904).
• Tooth retention. Oral calcium with vitamin D seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral calcium, via supplementation or as part of the diet, does not seem to be beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Although some studies disagree (15631,39041,95811,107237,113917), most population research suggests that increased calcium intake is not associated with overall breast cancer risk (15631,16715,98895,107236,107237,113917). However, one meta-analysis of observational studies shows that although higher total calcium intake is not associated with breast cancer risk, higher dietary calcium intake, specifically, may be associated with a slightly reduced risk (113917). Also, some analyses suggest that calcium intake may be associated with the risk for certain breast cancer sub-types. Some subgroup analyses suggest that calcium intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, adults (15631,107237) and that dietary calcium intake may reduce estrogen receptor(ER)-negative breast cancer, but not ER-positive breast cancer (107236). However, most research has not evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation or intake on breast cancer subtypes. The best evidence to date, from a large scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years after menopause does not reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer at the end of the study and 5 years after the end of the intervention (16715,98895).
• Fractures. Although oral calcium prevents fractures in osteoporosis, most evidence shows that calcium does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis discussion for more information on the use of calcium for this purpose. Details: Robust meta-analyses of mostly large, high-quality clinical studies show that calcium supplementation 500-1600 mg daily for 0.5-7 years with or without vitamin D does not reduce total fractures, hip fractures, vertebral fractures, or non-vertebral fractures in older adults without osteoporosis (95822,112486). A large-scale study in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years who were enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) suggests that calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D 400 IU daily for 7 years only modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) and does not significantly reduce fracture risk. This lack of effect may have been due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. In those who were 80% adherent, the combination of calcium plus vitamin D reduced the risk of hip fracture by about 29% (14282). Also, some clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 5 years does not attenuate loss of height after menopause when compared with placebo (95810). Additional meta-analyses of clinical and observational evidence suggest that calcium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, such as hip fractures (38589,38888,98895). Some other research has suggested that calcium in combination with vitamin D reduces fracture risk in older patients without osteoporosis (980,1836,8818,12930,12933,12952,38849,102145,107235); however, this research is confounded by a number of variables, including the presence of hormonal therapy and differing levels of fracture risk at baseline (1836,8818,95822). Conflicting findings on this topic might also be due to genetic differences in patient populations. A population analysis of the WHI study found that, in older females with the lowest genetic susceptibility to low BMD, taking calcium with vitamin D is associated with a reduction in fracture risk. However, in females with a higher genetic susceptibility to low BMD, there is no association between supplementation and fracture risk. This might be because individuals with a lower susceptibility to low BMD are also more responsive to calcium and vitamin D supplementation (97357). As of April 2018, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with vitamin D >400 IU daily along with calcium >1000 mg daily is safe and effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture. USPSTF recommends against supplementing with calcium 1000 mg daily or less along with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal females (95695).
• Obesity. Oral calcium does not seem to improve weight loss in adults or children with overweight or obesity. Details: Observational research has found that adults and children with low calcium intake are more likely to gain weight, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and be overweight or obese when compared to people with high calcium intake (12124,12125,12126,12127,14265). Additional observational research has found that increasing calcium intake is associated with weight loss in females; the results in males have been conflicting (12127,15602,15603). Despite these findings from observational research and a few small clinical studies (12128,15397,14438,98905,113918), most clinical research has found that increased calcium intake does not increase weight loss (12052,13138,15396,15399,38985,39004,97356). A meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies shows that daily dietary and supplemental calcium intake that meets the dietary reference intake (DRI) of 1000 mg or more daily does not increase weight loss in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when compared with intake below the DRI (95813). An older meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials also shows that increased dietary and supplemental calcium intake does not increase weight loss (15605).
• Overall mortality. Oral calcium does not seem to reduce overall mortality. Details: While some population research has found that calcium taken in combination with vitamin D in older females is associated with a lower risk of death (97353), most evidence shows that calcium, with or without vitamin D, has no effect on all-cause mortality (93533,97308,113584).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral calcium does not reduce the risk of developing CVD and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Clinical research shows that calcium does not decrease CVD risk. Several separate meta-analyses of clinical and population research involving over 50,000 patients show that taking calcium 600-1200 mg daily for up to 7 years does not reduce the risk of CVD-related outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or overall mortality (39018,91350,92994,93533,97308,98902,107231,107233). No association was found between total dietary or supplemental calcium intake with or without vitamin D and the risk of CVD or mortality (91350,93533,97308). In fact, some population and clinical research has found that when calcium is used alone or with vitamin D, there is an INCREASED risk of CVD and coronary heart disease (38077,107233). However, other clinical research disagrees (93533). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease by 1.1-1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Intravenous calcium does not prevent nerve pain in patients given oxaliplatin. Oral calcium has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: While pooled analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials suggest that calcium and magnesium infusion decreases the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials shows that the infusion has no effect in preventing neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). Additionally, clinical trials show that administering calcium gluconate 1 gram with magnesium sulfate 1 gram intravenously immediately before, or before and after, the administration of a single oxaliplatin cycle (90005), or over the entire 6-cycle course of oxaliplatin, does not improve symptoms of neurotoxicity when compared with placebo (96474).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral calcium does not prevent MI. When taken in the absence of vitamin D, oral calcium may increase the risk of MI. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of calcium is associated with a decreased risk of MI (91350). However, a 2010 meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking calcium at a dose of at least 500 mg daily is associated with an approximate 30% INCREASE in the risk of MI in patients over the age of 40. According to this analysis, one additional case of MI will occur for every 69 patients that take calcium for 5 years (17482). A more recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of MI by 1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research studied postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233) In contrast, other meta-analyses of clinical research have shown that taking calcium for up to 7 years is NOT associated with an increased risk of MI, including a meta-analysis that only included postmenopausal females (93533,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI in postmenopausal females (93533). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for alcohol use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 800 mg and vitamin D 200 IU orally daily for 14 days modestly reduces alcohol craving scores and withdrawal scores when compared with placebo in adults with alcohol dependence that are undergoing withdrawal. Taking calcium carbonate did not reduce the need for diazepam; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (107234).
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for atherosclerosis. Details: A population study has found that taking calcium 1.2 grams daily for 3 years has no effect on carotid intima thickness or carotid atherosclerosis incidence. A total calcium intake (dietary and supplemental) of at least 1794 mg daily in older females may be associated with a decreased risk of carotid atherosclerosis when compared with a total calcium intake below 1010 mg daily (97351).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the odds of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. Details: A small observational study found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a 52% reduced odds of an autism spectrum disorder in the offspring (98900).
• Brain tumor. It is unclear if dietary calcium intake is associated with risk of brain tumor. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 case-control studies has found that higher dietary calcium intake is associated with a lower odds of brain tumor when compared with lower dietary intake (113922). The validity of this finding is limited by the exploratory nature of the included studies, which analyzed all dietary ingredients for any potential associations.
• Cancer. Oral calcium alone does not seem to prevent cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Taking calcium alone does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of cancer (12118,15629). The role of calcium in cancer prevention when taken along with vitamin D is controversial, as conflicting results exist. One clinical trial shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1400-1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1100 IU daily have a 60% lower relative risk for developing cancer of any type. Approximately 25 postmenopausal females would need to take this combination for 4 years to prevent one occurrence of cancer (15629). However, a more recent clinical study shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of cancer at 4 years (93943). Reasons for the disparate results are not entirely clear. The discrepancies do not appear to be related to baseline vitamin D levels or different study populations. It is possible that, given the 10-year time lapse between the two publications, the discrepancies result from differences in cancer detection capability. Also, since cancer risk was a secondary outcome measure in the earlier study and a primary outcome measure in the more recent study, it is possible that the discrepancies result from differences in statistical methodologies. The effect of vitamin D and calcium on cancer risk in males and younger patients is not known. There is also interest in using calcium for reducing the risk of hematological malignancies. An analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU for up to 10 years is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of hematologic malignancies when compared with placebo. However, no effect on hematologic malignancy related mortality was seen (97354).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between a higher dietary intake of calcium and the risk of depression when compared with a lower dietary intake of calcium (96480).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if dietary calcium intake is associated with type 2 diabetes risk. Details: Some population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from the diet or supplements, alone or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713,96473,113929). One meta-analysis of cohort and cross-sectional studies found that the highest level of dietary calcium intake is associated with an 18% relative reduction in risk of type 2 diabetes when compared with the lowest level of intake. A dose-response analysis suggests that each 300, 600, and 1000 mg per day increase in dietary calcium intake is associated with a 7%, 14%, and 23% reduced risk of type 2 diabetes, respectively (113929). However, population research is often limited by confounding variables. For example, one analysis suggests that any beneficial effect might be influenced by concomitant magnesium intake (96473,113929), while another suggests that any benefit from increased intake may be more pronounced in females, adults aged 50 years or older, and Asian populations (113929). Furthermore, other population research has found that serum calcium levels higher than 9.6 mg/dL are associated with greater risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults with osteoporosis (95815).
• Dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for dyslipidemia. Details: One clinical study in adults with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia shows that adding calcium carbonate 400 mg three times daily to a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) for 6 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4% and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 4% when compared with the low-fat diet and placebo (2557). In contrast, a clinical study in females with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 800 mg daily for 2 years INCREASES total cholesterol levels and carotid intima-media thickness in postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, females when compared with placebo (97350). Calcium supplementation has also been evaluated in combination with vitamin D. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including adults with normolipidemia and dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily and vitamin D 200-7142 IU daily modestly improves HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplementation is most beneficial in patients with dyslipidemia at baseline (107227). The relationship between dietary calcium intake and serum lipid levels has also been evaluated in observational research. A meta-analysis of 7-11 observational studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with total cholesterol levels, although small differences in individual lipid parameters were identified. Additionally, a meta-analysis of 4-9 observational studies suggests that calcium intake is not associated with the risk of developing hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, or low HDL. A subgroup analysis found that higher calcium intake may be associated with lower triglyceride levels in Asian populations (113927). Overall, these findings are limited by significant heterogeneity and the cross-sectional nature of the included studies.
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing pain associated with dysmenorrhea. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg with vitamin D 5000 IU daily for three menstrual cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (95821). However, calcium carbonate 1000 mg taken alone seems to reduce pain when compared with placebo.
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but dietary calcium does not seem to have any effect (38893).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A very small clinical study in resistance-trained adults shows that taking calcium carbonate 500 mg 4 times daily for 3 weeks does not attenuate exercise-induced muscle damage from bench presses when compared with placebo (113933). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing falls. Details: Research suggests that calcium in combination with vitamin D, but not calcium alone, might prevent falls by decreasing body sway and normalizing systolic blood pressure (6362,11939,39038). Some experts think the combination of calcium and vitamin D may be important (11916). Preliminary clinical research in adults residing in a health care facility shows that taking vitamin D supplements while increasing dietary calcium and protein for 2 years reduces falls by 11% when compared with standard diets. Intervention diets were supplemented with milk, yogurt, and cheese to provide calcium 1142 mg and protein 69 grams daily (107235). There might also be different effects in females compared to males. In one study, females aged 65 years or older who took vitamin D 700 IU plus calcium citrate 500 mg daily over a 3-year period had a 46% lower risk of falling. However, this combination did not decrease falls in males (14291).
• Fluorosis. Oral calcium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking calcium orally, in combination with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and vitamin D, seems to be effective for reducing excessive fluoride levels in children and improving symptoms of fluorosis in children aged 6-12 years (990).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral calcium in combination with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing heart failure. Details: Based on a secondary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), taking calcium 1000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily does not reduce the risk of heart failure in the overall population or in individuals at high risk. However, in a subgroup of postmenopausal females without risk factors for heart failure, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of developing heart failure by about 37% (97307).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing blood levels of lead. Details: Lead is mobilized along with calcium from bone during pregnancy and lactation, resulting in increased serum concentrations of lead. One clinical study suggests that calcium supplementation does not significantly decrease these elevated lead concentrations (1586). However, another clinical study suggests that taking calcium reduces blood lead levels by 11% when compared with placebo, with greatest effects observed in those with high baseline levels of lead (38957).
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral calcium for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of calcium for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium alone or with vitamin D is beneficial for metabolic syndrome prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet and supplements alone, or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713).
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing nephrotic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium 500-1000 mg daily for 3 months in combination with vitamin D3 60,000 IU daily or weekly for 4 weeks has no effect on bone mineral density or the risk of relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (97355).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking calcium alone or with vitamin D3 1000 IU daily reduced the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but had no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma (104622).
• Oral mucositis. When used in combination with fluoride treatments, a calcium phosphate mouth rinse seems to prevent and reduce mucositis-related pain in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that using a particular mouth rinse (Caphosol, EUSA Pharma) containing calcium phosphate, in combination with fluoride treatments, reduces days of mucositis, the duration of pain, and the dose and days of morphine used when compared with placebo and fluoride treatment (38611).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: An older meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (38792). However, a more recent pooled analysis of 15 cohort and case-control studies has found that the highest intake of dietary or dairy calcium is associated with a 20% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared to the lowest intake (97349).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing postpartum depression risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium 2 grams daily beginning at 11-21 weeks gestation reduces depression at 12 weeks postpartum when compared with placebo. However, no benefit is seen at 6 weeks postpartum (39447).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing leg cramps during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking calcium 1 gram twice daily (as a mixture of salts) for 2 weeks can reduce pregnancy-related leg cramps during the second half of pregnancy when compared with no treatment (2567).
• Prematurity. It is unclear if supplemental calcium is beneficial for the growth and development of preterm infants. Details: A small clinical study in preterm infants consuming human milk shows that supplementation with calcium 45 mg/kg daily and phosphorus 25 mg/kg daily does not affect infant weight, length, head circumference, or risk of osteopenia after 6 weeks when compared with human milk alone (113924). However, the duration and size of this study may have been too limited to detect any difference between groups.
• Preterm labor. It is unclear if oral calcium reduces the risk of preterm labor. Details: A meta-analysis of 10 clinical studies shows that taking calcium supplements during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of preterm labor when compared with placebo (113909). A separate meta-analysis of 7 clinical studies conducted in China, which evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy, shows that this combination reduces the relative risk of preterm labor by 74% when compared with routine care (113913).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily might decrease the risk of developing prostate cancer (14133). However, some epidemiological research suggests that consuming very high doses of calcium, over 2000 mg daily, might actually increase the risk of developing prostate cancer (14134). Some epidemiological research also suggests that doses greater than 1500 mg daily increase the risk of poorly differentiated, clinically advanced, and fatal prostate cancer (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer (98894). However, contradictory research suggests that there is no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall risk of prostate cancer (14131,14132,104630).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Some population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke (4822,38678). However, other population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is not associated with a decreased risk of stroke (91350). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years does not affect the risk of stroke when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females, and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Vertigo. Oral calcium with vitamin D might reduce positional vertigo; the effect of calcium when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking calcium 500 mg and vitamin D 400 IU twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate calcium for these uses.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Vitamin A deficiency. Some preliminary clinical research shows that consuming one spoonful of carrot jam daily for 10 weeks improves growth velocity when compared with control in children with vitamin A deficiency (25819). Other preliminary research shows that consuming 100 grams of grated carrot daily for 60 days improves vitamin A status when compared with placebo in lactating women at risk for vitamin A deficiency (67861).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Breast cancer. A meta-analysis of observational research has found that consuming a diet highest in carrots is associated with a 21% decreased odds of developing breast cancer when compared with consuming a diet lowest in carrots (101715).
• Colorectal cancer. A large observational study in older Danish adults shows that self-reported high consumption of raw carrot (2-4 carrots weekly or greater than 32 grams daily) is associated with a 17% lower likelihood of colorectal cancer diagnosis, whereas lower carrot consumption is not associated with a decreased risk. The validity of these findings may be limited by selection bias, recall bias, and other confounding factors (106559).
• Fibromyalgia. Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming a mostly raw, pure vegetarian diet that includes two to four 240 mL servings of carrot juice daily for 7 months might improve fibromyalgia symptoms in some people (98057). The effect of carrot alone on fibromyalgia is unknown.
• Prostate cancer. Population research has found that higher intake of carrot is associated with an 18% decrease in the odds of developing prostate cancer. Increasing carrot consumption by 10 grams daily or 1 serving per week is associated with a 4% to 5% decrease in the odds of developing prostate cancer (96307). More evidence is needed to rate carrot for these uses.

(Read more about CARROT)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Celiac disease. Although there has been interest in using oral lipase for celiac disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lipase for this purpose.
• Dyspepsia. It is unclear if oral lipase is beneficial for improving symptoms of postprandial distress syndrome. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking a specific acid-resistant lipase (Amano Enzyme USA) 280 mg immediately before a high-fat meal does not reduce postprandial bloating and nausea when compared with placebo in individuals with postprandial distress syndrome (101900).
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although there has been interest in using oral lipase for IBD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lipase for this purpose.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if adding a specific form of lipase, recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase (rhBSSL), to infant formula improves outcomes in premature infants. Some research suggests a potential increased risk for adverse effects. Details: Human breast milk contains rhBSSL, but it is inactivated when breast milk is pasteurized for donation. Clinical research in infants born before 32 weeks' gestation shows that adding rhBSSL as 8700 units per 100 mL formula or pasteurized breast milk, for 4 weeks does not increase growth velocity, body length, or head circumference over the next 12 months when compared with formula or pasteurized breast milk devoid of lipase. However, the infants who were small for gestational age (SGA), which made up approximately 15% of the study population, grew by an additional 1.9 grams/kg daily on average when compared with placebo (101940). More evidence is needed to rate lipase for these uses.

(Read more about LIPASE)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Oral enteric-coated peppermint oil is conditionally recommended by the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) for the relief of global IBS symptoms, such as abdominal pain. Details: The ACG conditionally recommends the use of peppermint for the relief of global IBS symptoms. This recommendation is based on an available meta-analysis of generally low-quality clinical research (105124). Several clinical trials and meta-analyses show that taking enteric-coated peppermint oil 1-2 capsules orally two to four times daily reduces abdominal pain, distention, flatulence, and bowel movements in patients with IBS. Each capsule provides approximately 0.2 mL of peppermint oil or 180-225 mg peppermint oil. Most trials have used specific products (Colpermin, Tillotts Pharma; Mintoil, Cadigroup; Ibgard, IM HealthScience, Tempocol) (3802,3803,4469,11778,11779,17681,17682,68467,68515,68522)(68603,68604,68605,96360,99493,109980). The most recent meta-analysis to date shows that four patients would need to take peppermint oil to prevent one patient from having persistent IBS symptoms, and seven patients would need to take peppermint oil to prevent one patient from having abdominal pain. However, the individual studies included in the analysis lasted no more than 12 weeks (109980); any long-term effects are unclear. Although most studies have shown benefit for reducing symptoms, some older studies have found no significant effect (11777,11789) or only short-term benefits (68620). Also, a well-designed study shows that taking peppermint oil capsules designed for either small intestinal release (enteric-coated) or ileocolonic release does not increase the number of people with at least a 30% decrease in abdominal pain over a period of 4 weeks, although symptoms are modestly reduced when compared with placebo (102602). Another clinical trial in patients with moderate to severe IBS shows that taking a specific enteric-coated formulation of peppermint oil (Pepogest; Nature's Way) 180 mg three times daily for 6 weeks does not further improve symptom severity when compared with placebo. However, both groups experienced a large improvement on the IBS-Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) and the IBS Global Improvement Scale (107955). The validity of these findings is limited due to lost data and inconsistent follow-up; additionally, adverse effects occurred more frequently in the peppermint oil group. The reasons for these negative findings are unclear but may include short treatment durations and the use of different formulations; additionally, IBS is comprised of various subtypes and symptoms that can range in severity and presentation, which may alter treatment response. Some clinical research has also evaluated a specific combination product (Atrantil, KBS Research) containing peppermint leaf, red quebracho extract, and conker tree extract. Taking this product as needed for 2 weeks seems to reduce constipation and bloating when compared to baseline in patients with constipation-predominant IBS (95429,95430). It is unclear if the effects of this product are due to peppermint, the other ingredients, or the combination.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Barium enema-related colonic spasm. Rectal peppermint, as part of barium enema preparations, seems to reduce colonic spasms during examination. Oral peppermint also seems to be beneficial. Details: Rectal use of peppermint oil, added as an ingredient in barium enema preparations, seems to relax the colon during barium enema examination and reduce the percentage of patients who experience colonic spasms by about 25% to 30% (6739,6749,12009). Adding peppermint oil to the barium enema seems to be at least as effective as using systemic scopolamine (Buscopan). Adding peppermint oil to the barium solution also does not seem to impair image quality (12009). Some clinical research also shows that taking peppermint oil orally before the start of a double-contrast barium enema examination decreases spasms and might also increase diagnostic quality (14467).
• Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Oral and inhaled peppermint seem to reduce nausea and vomiting in patients with CINV. Details: Clinical research shows that adding peppermint oil, 40 drops in 20 mL water, every 8 hours following chemotherapy treatment to treatment with standard antiemetics reduces the severity of nausea, vomiting, and anorexia by moderate to large amounts over 48 hours when compared with a plain water placebo (105123). The use of peppermint oil aromatherapy has also been investigated. Clinical research shows that adding 2 drops of peppermint oil to a cool, damp washcloth for use on the neck as aromatherapy for about 30 minutes helps relieve chemotherapy-induced nausea by a small amount when compared with a washcloth without peppermint oil (102603). Additional clinical research in patients receiving standard antiemetics after chemotherapy shows that applying one drop of peppermint oil below the nose three times daily for 5 days reduces the severity of nausea and the frequency of nausea, vomiting, and retching by a moderate to large amount when compared with the antiemetics alone. These parameters were not improved following treatment with cisplatin (105122). A meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials in adults receiving chemotherapy also shows that peppermint oil aromatherapy moderately improves nausea and vomiting when compared with control. However, the results of this analysis are limited by heterogenous application methods, doses, and durations of peppermint therapy (114761). In children with acute leukemia, a small clinical study shows that aromatherapy with 2 drops of peppermint oil and 3 drops of lemon oil in 80 mL of water diffused 30 minutes prior to and 2 and 4 hours after chemotherapy once weekly for 4 weeks decreases the severity of nausea, vomiting, and retching, and improves quality of life scores when compared with diffused water or no intervention (112015). The validity of these findings is limited by the use of patient-reported outcomes. Another small clinical trial in children receiving chemotherapy for acute leukemia shows that aromatherapy with peppermint oil 2%, 0.2 mL inhaled over 3 minutes immediately prior to 3 consecutive chemotherapy sessions, added to standard care (e.g. antiemetic medications), reduces overall incidence of nausea by 40%, and improves nausea and vomiting severity scores, when compared with no additional interventions. These results were similar to those receiving Swedish massage prior to chemotherapy sessions (114759).
• Dyspepsia. Oral peppermint, in combination with caraway and possibly other ingredients, seems to reduce symptoms of dyspepsia. It is unclear if oral peppermint alone is beneficial. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking specific products containing peppermint and caraway oil (Enteroplant, Dr Willmar Schwabe Pharmaceuticals; Menthacarin, Dr Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co.) improves quality of life and reduces symptoms of dyspepsia, including feelings of fullness, pain, and mild gastrointestinal spasms (6740,6741,10075,96344,102600). A meta-analysis of three of these clinical studies shows that taking this combination product 2-3 times daily for 4 weeks modestly reduces abdominal pain when compared with placebo (110091). Taking this combination twice daily for 4 weeks also improves postprandial distress syndrome and epigastric pain syndrome, two subtypes of dyspepsia, when compared with placebo (96344). The combination of enteric-coated peppermint oil 90 mg and caraway oil 50 mg appears to be comparable to cisapride for relieving dyspepsia when taken 2-3 times daily for up to 4 weeks (6740,6741,10075). However, most trials investigating this combination are small and/or of overall low quality (102600). A specific combination product containing peppermint leaf (Iberogast, Steigerwald Arzneimittelwerk GmbH) also seems to improve symptoms of dyspepsia. The combination includes peppermint leaf plus clown's mustard plant, German chamomile, caraway, licorice, milk thistle, angelica, celandine, and lemon balm (7049). A meta-analysis of studies using this combination product shows that taking 1 mL orally three times daily over a period of 4 weeks reduces the severity of acid reflux, epigastric pain, cramping, nausea, and vomiting when compared with placebo (13089). A similar combination product containing extracts from peppermint leaf, clown's mustard plant, German chamomile flower, caraway, licorice root, and lemon balm (STW 5-II, Steigerwald Arzneimittelwerk GmbH) 1 mL taken three times daily for up to 8 weeks eliminates gastrointestinal symptoms in 40% more dyspepsia patients when compared with placebo (12724).
• Endoscopy-associated adverse effects. Intraluminal peppermint seems to reduce spasticity during an endoscopy. It is unclear if oral peppermint is beneficial for reducing adverse effects related to endoscopy. Details: A meta-analysis of four clinical trials show that peppermint oil, administered orally or intraluminally, reduces the incidence of spasticity by about 41% when compared with placebo in patients undergoing endoscopy, with severe spasticity occurring at about 30% the rate of those taking placebo. However, there was no effect on subjective pain (102604). Individual clinical studies show that intraluminal peppermint oil can reduce both pain and spams in patients undergoing endoscopy (18220,68371,68395,68445,68532). However, there are limitations with this form of administration, including cost and practicality, which has led to interest in the use of oral formulations (104221). Studies evaluating oral extended-release peppermint have been conflicting. While one study shows that a specific extended-release peppermint oil product (Colpermin) 187 mg or 0.2 mL taken orally 4 hours prior to a colonoscopy reduces procedure time, pain, and spasticity (68532), a study using another specific extended-release peppermint oil (IBGard) did not show an effect on colonic spasms, procedure time, or adenoma detection rate when compared with placebo (104221). These differing outcomes may be due to timing of administration. The study that showed benefit administered the treatment 4 hours prior to endoscopy, whereas the study showing no benefit administered the treatment only 1 hour prior. This suggests that extended-release peppermint may need to be administered at least 4 hours prior to the procedure to allow for adequate colonic release (68532,102604,104221).
• Nipple fissures. Topical peppermint seems to reduce cracked skin and pain in the nipples due to breastfeeding. Details: Clinical research shows that topical application of peppermint oil in gel or water reduces cracked skin and pain in the nipple area from breastfeeding when compared with using placebo, lanolin, or the expressed breast milk technique (68454,68462). Other research shows that applying peppermint oil in cream immediately after breastfeeding for 2 weeks decreases pain and trauma in the nipple area similarly to the topical application of dexpanthenol or lanolin (96365).
• Pressure ulcers. Topical peppermint seems to reduce the risk of pressure ulcers. Details: Clinical research in bedridden patients shows that prophylactic application of a topical gel containing peppermint oil 0.2% three times daily for up to 14 days results in pressure injuries in about 23% of patients compared with 77% of those given a placebo gel (102605).
• Tension headache. Topical peppermint seems to relieve tension headaches. Details: Clinical research shows that topical application of peppermint oil 10% relieves tension headaches when compared with placebo (3801,6190).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Abdominal pain. Although there has been interest in using oral peppermint for abdominal pain, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this condition.
• Anxiety. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for reducing anxiety. Details: A clinical trial in patients presenting to the emergency department for an acute coronary syndrome event shows that placing 3 drops of peppermint oil on a cotton ball and inhaling for 1 hour improves anxiety and respiratory rate when compared with baseline or placebo (107958). Due to the single-dose nature of this study, the effects of repeated inhalation of peppermint oil are unclear.
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral peppermint oil is beneficial for athletic performance. Details: Preliminary clinical research in trained adult runners shows that taking peppermint essential oil, 0.05 mL diluted in 500 mL of water, orally once 30 minutes before exercise improves running time to exhaustion by 11% when compared with placebo (112742). Another very small clinical study in elite soccer athletes shows that use of a specific peppermint essential oil (doTERRA), 1 drop rubbed into hands and inhaled with 5 deep breaths, does not improve jump performance metrics when compared with placebo (114760).
• Breast cancer-related hot flashes. It is unclear if topical peppermint is beneficial for reducing hot flashes in patients with breast cancer. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that using a spray containing a combination of peppermint and neroli hydrolat does not alleviate hot flashes in most patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer when compared with using a plain water spray (68481).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for improving cognitive function. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that inhalation of peppermint oil slightly improves memory and the performance of cognitive tasks such as typing, alphabetization, and ordering, but not attention and speed of task completion, when compared with control (56954,68416,68466).
• Common cold. Although there has been interest in using oral, topical, or inhaled peppermint for the common cold, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this condition.
• Dental plaque. Topical peppermint has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that rinsing the mouth for one minute with 10 mL of a specific combination product (HiOra, Himalaya Herbal Healthcare) containing peppermint oil and numerous other ingredients twice daily for two days reduces plaque index or plaque area when compared with placebo; however, it was not as effective as chlorhexidine 0.2% solution (68530). It is unclear if these effects are due to peppermint oil, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Diffuse esophageal spasm. It is unclear if oral peppermint oil is beneficial for diffuse esophageal spasm. Details: A small exploratory study in adults with diffuse esophageal spasm shows that drinking a solution of peppermint oil, 5 drops in 10 mL of water, can resolve esophageal contractions when compared with baseline (13415). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral peppermint oil is beneficial for reducing menstrual pain. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking three capsules of peppermint oil (Colpermin; Tillotts Company or Razak company) daily for 3 days, starting on the first day of menstruation, is as effective as mefenamic acid 250 mg three times daily for reducing pain, and more effective for reducing nausea and vomiting, associated with dysmenorrhea. However, mefenamic acid was more effective for reducing bleeding and analgesic use (105125).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil improves fatigue in patients with cardiac disease. Details: A clinical trial in hospitalized patients with various forms of cardiac disease shows that placing 3 drops of peppermint oil on a cotton ball and inhaling for 20 minutes nightly for 7 days improves fatigue scores when compared with placebo. These improvements were similar to those seen with lavender oil inhalation. Fatigue scores decreased by 24 and 21 points in the peppermint and lavender groups, respectively, compared with a 2-point reduction in the placebo group (107959). The validity of these findings is limited due to the short duration of treatment.
• Halitosis. Peppermint has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients as a mouthwash; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that rinsing the mouth with a specific combination of tea tree oil, peppermint, and lemon essential oil once for three minutes improves breath smell when compared with placebo or benzydamine hydrochloride (19177). Other preliminary clinical research in elderly adults with dementia who require oral care assistance shows that cleaning the mouth with a mixture of peppermint oil, tea tree oil, and lemon essential oils diluted to 0.5%, applied via gauze, twice daily for 7 days improves halitosis scores and oral condition scores when compared with placebo (112957).
• Insomnia. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for insomnia. Details: Preliminary clinical research in cancer patients shows that receiving aromatherapy as three drops of peppermint oil applied to a cotton ball and attached to the collar for 20 minutes at bedtime for one week improves sleep when compared with baseline. However, it seems to be no better than using lavender oil aromatherapy or using a control of lavender oil 1% (103063).
• Menopausal symptoms. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for menopausal symptoms. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with menopausal symptoms shows that receiving aromatherapy as 2 drops of peppermint oil with upper extremity massage and for 30 minutes twice weekly for 4 weeks moderately improves menopause symptom scores, including both somatic symptoms and urogenital symptoms, when compared with placebo (112745).
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if intranasal or inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for migraine headache. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that using 1-2 doses of intranasal peppermint oil 1.5% (Poursina Company) at the start of migraine pain is as effective as intranasal lidocaine 4%, and more effective than placebo, for reducing migraine headache intensity. Approximately 42% of those using peppermint oil indicated a high level of headache reduction, compared with 42% of those using lidocaine and 5% of those using placebo. Also, pain relief was felt within 5 minutes in more patients using peppermint than placebo (105126). However, it is unclear if participants were truly blinded to the use of peppermint oil. Other preliminary clinical research in pediatric patients with migraine or other chronic headaches shows that receiving aromatherapy with peppermint oil over 10 minutes during a footbath does not improve pain or anxiety scores when compared with control (112746).
• Mosquito repellent. Although there has been interest in using topical peppermint oil as a mosquito repellent, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this purpose.
• Myalgia. Although there has been interest in using topical peppermint oil for myalgia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this condition.
• Oral mucositis. Topical peppermint has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in adults undergoing stem cell transplantation shows that using an oral rinse containing peppermint oil and German chamomile three times daily, in addition to standard treatment with sodium chloride and chlorhexidine, reduces the duration and severity of mucositis and the use of narcotic analgesics when compared with placebo and standard treatment. However, this oral rinse does not reduce or delay the occurrence of mucositis or affect the duration of hospitalization (96363). Another small clinical study in adults with head and neck cancers undergoing radiation shows that rinsing with 5 mL of a polyherbal mouthwash containing peppermint oil, German chamomile, aloe vera, and honey for 1 minute 3 times daily for 6 weeks reduces oral mucositis incidence, severity, and pain when compared with chlorhexidine 0.2% and placebo (111291). Clinical research in adults receiving treatment with 5-fluorouracil shows that using an oral rinse containing peppermint, sage tea, and thyme in addition to basic oral care, starting on the first day of chemotherapy and continuing for 14 days, delays the onset of mucositis, but not the rate or severity of mucositis, when compared with basic oral care alone (96364). It is unclear if these effects are due to peppermint oil, other ingredients, or the combinations.
• Osteoarthritis. Although there has been interest in using topical peppermint oil for osteoarthritis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this condition.
• Pain (acute). It is unclear if inhaled or topical peppermint oil is beneficial for acute pain. Details: Preliminary clinical research in cardiac patients shows that peppermint oil aromatherapy reduces pain associated with intravenous catheterization by a small amount when compared with a distilled water control (102601). Another small open-label study in adults undergoing venipuncture for dialysis shows that topical application of peppermint gel 5 mL reduces pain scores by approximately 50% when compared with no intervention. These results were similar to using a cold compress (114758). Additionally, a small open-label study in children undergoing a dental procedure, shows that topical application of peppermint oil 0.2% , moderately improves pain scores after a buccal injection when compared with lidocaine spray 15% (114757).
• Postherpetic neuralgia. Although there has been interest in using topical peppermint oil for postherpetic neuralgia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this condition.
• Postoperative ileus. It is unclear if oral peppermint oil is beneficial for the prevention of postoperative ileus. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a specific peppermint oil product (Colpermin, Tillotts Pharma) as two capsules three times daily for 5 days after routine gynecological surgery does not prevent postoperative abdominal distension and dyspepsia when compared with placebo (68602). Conversely, a small clinical study in patients undergoing elective cesarean section shows that taking 20 drops of peppermint oil 4 hours after surgery and then hourly for a total of three doses reduces the time to first bowel sounds by around 3.3 hours, first flatulence by 4.4 hours, and first stool by 5 hours when compared with placebo (110092).
• Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Some preliminary clinical studies suggest that inhaled peppermint may be beneficial for PONV. However, it is unclear if the benefit is due to aromatherapy or improved breathing patterns. Details: Some preliminary clinical research shows that using peppermint aromatherapy helps relieve postoperative nausea (3804,13415,68524,104219,104220). Inhaling peppermint oil 10% and 30% as aromatherapy reduces the severity of nausea when compared with placebo, with no significant difference between concentrations (104220). Small clinical trials show improvement in PONV within the first 4 hours after surgery. However, this effect diminishes beyond 4 hours (104219). Other preliminary clinical research shows that peppermint oil aromatherapy is no more effective for reducing postoperative nausea than inhaling isopropyl alcohol or saline (13416,68529). It is possible that any relief of postoperative nausea observed with peppermint aromatherapy results from improved breathing patterns after surgery rather than peppermint oil itself (13416,90512). One small study shows that inhaling peppermint oil while practicing controlled breathing does not appear to relieve PONV better than practicing controlled breathing alone (90512). Some preliminary clinical research shows that inhaling vapors from a mixture of peppermint, ginger, spearmint, and cardamom essential oils reduces symptoms of postoperative nausea in approximately 15% more patients when compared with inhaling ginger essential oils alone, and in approximately 43% more patients when compared with inhaling saline (89888). However, it is not clear if the effect is due to peppermint, the other oils, or the combination. In contrast, a small clinical trial in adults undergoing port catheter placement shows that application of a specific aromatherapy patch containing peppermint and lavender (Elequil Aromatabs, Beekley Medical) preoperatively does not reduce PONV rescue treatment when compared with placebo (114623). Another small clinical trial in adults with anxiety undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty shows that application of the same patch containing peppermint and lavender every 12 hours for 6 doses does not reduce overall PONV when compared with placebo (114622).
• Postoperative pain. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for postoperative pain. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing open heart cardiac surgery shows that receiving aromatherapy with peppermint oil 10%, 0.1 mL, three times daily for 7 doses moderately improves pain scores when compared with placebo (112747). Other preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing lumbar discectomy surgery shows that receiving aromatherapy with peppermint oil 5 drops once postoperatively modestly improves pain scores and anxiety scores when compared with no intervention (112744). A small clinical trial in adults undergoing port catheter placement shows that application of a specific aromatherapy patch containing peppermint and lavender (Elequil Aromatabs, Beekley Medical) preoperatively does not improve pain scores or reduce opioid rescue treatment in the immediate post-operative period when compared with placebo (114623). Another small clinical trial in adults with anxiety undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty shows that application of the same patch containing peppermint and lavender every 12 hours for 6 doses modestly reduceses opioid consumption on postoperative day 2, but not day 1, 7, or 30, when compared with placebo (114622). However, these changes are unlikely to be clinically relevant. In addition, it is unclear if any potential effects are due to peppermint, lavender, or the combination.
• Postoperative recovery. Inhaled peppermint has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in adults undergoing port catheter placement shows that application of a specific aromatherapy patch containing peppermint and lavender (Elequil Aromatabs, Beekley Medical) preoperatively does not shorten postoperative length of stay when compared with placebo (114623).
• Postoperative sleep disturbance. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for postoperative sleep disturbance. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing open heart cardiac surgery shows that receiving aromatherapy with peppermint oil 10%, 0.1 mL, three times daily for 7 doses modestly improves sleep scores when compared with placebo (112747).
• Pre-procedural anxiety. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for reducing anxiety prior to a medical procedure. Details: Preliminary clinical research in cardiac patients shows that peppermint oil aromatherapy does not reduce anxiety associated with intravenous catheterization when compared with a distilled water control (102601).
• Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Inhaled peppermint oil has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that aromatherapy with a mixture of 5% lemon and 5% peppermint essential oils modestly reduces the intensity of nausea and vomiting on days 2-4, but not day 1, when compared with placebo aromatherapy. When nauseated, patients placed three drops of the essential oil mixture (Barij Essence Co.) onto a cotton ball held 3 cm from the nose. This action could be repeated after 5 minutes if needed (105121).
• Pruritus. Some preliminary clinical studies suggest that topical peppermint oil improves itching of various etiologies. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with renal, hepatic, or diabetic pruritus shows that topical application of peppermint oil 5% in petrolatum twice daily for 2 weeks improves symptoms of pruritus when compared with petrolatum alone (96361). Preliminary clinical research in patients with severe or intractable pruritus secondary to burn scars shows that applying a specific product (Chongqing No.1, CQ-01, MJ Medical Gel Systems Ltd.) containing peppermint oil 3.6%, menthol 1.4%, and methyl salicylate 2.5%, covered with gauze for 24 hours, reduces the severity of pruritus for up to 7 days after application when compared with hydrogel covered with gauze or with gauze alone (96362). Preliminary clinical research in females experiencing itchy skin due to intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy also shows that applying peppermint oil 0.5% in sesame oil twice daily for 2 weeks reduces pruritus severity approximately 1.8-fold when compared with sesame oil alone (89478).
• Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Although there has been interest in using oral peppermint for SIBO, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this condition.
• Stress. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for stress. Details: Clinical research shows that peppermint aromatherapy decreases physical and perceived levels of stress when compared with baseline (68422,68517). A small clinical study in adults undergoing a virtual reality (VR) driving scenario to test road rage shows that exposure to peppermint oil (Pure Essential Oil of Peppermint, Tisserand Aromatherapy) 5 drops via fan diffuser improves aggressive driving behavior scores but does not seem to improve self-reported stress, aggression, alertness, happiness, or calmness when compared with controls that did not receive aromatherapy during the VR session (112017).
• Toothache. Although there has been interest in using topical peppermint oil for toothache, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this condition.
• Urticaria. Although there has been interest in using topical peppermint oil for urticaria, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate peppermint for these uses.

(Read more about PEPPERMINT)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Aging skin. In patients with deep wrinkles, preliminary clinical research shows that taking zinc citrate 50 mg and phytase 3,000 units daily for four days prior to a botulinum toxin treatment increases the patient-reported duration of botulinum toxin effects by approximately 25%, compared with no improvement in patients taking zinc gluconate 10 mg or placebo. The efficacy of botulinum treatment was also improved (101913). Whether this reported benefit is due to the dose or form of zinc, citrate, phytase, the combination, or other factors, is unclear (101913,101914).
• Blepharospasm. In patients with blepharospasm, preliminary clinical research shows that taking zinc citrate 50 mg and phytase 3,000 units daily for four days prior to a botulinum toxin treatment increases the patient-reported duration of botulinum toxin effects by approximately 25%, compared with no improvement in patients taking zinc gluconate 10 mg or placebo. The efficacy of botulinum treatment was also improved (101913). Whether this reported benefit is due to the dose or form of zinc, citrate, phytase, the combination, or other factors, is unclear (101913,101914).
• Child growth. Clinical research in infants consuming a corn-based diet shows that taking a fat- and micronutrient-based food supplement containing phytase, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), arachidonic acid, and lysine increases linear growth at age 8 and 10 months and improves locomotor development when compared with not taking this supplement. In contrast, a similar fat- and micronutrient-based supplement without phytase, DHA, arachidonic acid, and lysine does not improve these indices when compared with not taking a supplement. The phytase-containing supplement did not affect linear growth, weight for age, or hand-eye coordination at 12 months (101902). These reported benefits to child growth are likely to be due to the combination of provided essential and non-essential nutrients. Any role of phytase is expected to be minimal.
• Iron deficiency anemia. Taking phytase with a meal containing phytate and iron increases iron absorption (101903,101904,101906). However, the effect of phytase specifically for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia remains unclear (101902). Phytase is sometimes added to the diet to increase the absorption of iron from food. In a small study of women, some with iron deficiency anemia, incubating wheat as a source of phytase with a traditional grain high in phytate increased iron absorption from the meal to 8.3% from 2.6% (101904). Also, adding microbial phytase to whole wheat rolls containing phytate increases iron absorption from a meal by approximately 82% when compared with rolls without added phytase (101906). In another small study, the addition of a microbial phytase to a single corn meal with added micronutrients increases iron absorption and incorporation into red blood cells after 14 days by 1.85-fold when compared with the meal without added phytase (101903). However, consuming white wheat rolls with added wheat bran as a source of phytase does not increase iron absorption from the meal when compared to consuming rolls with added wheat bran with deactivated phytase (101906). The use of phytase as treatment for iron deficiency, with or without anemia, has rarely been investigated. However, clinical research in infants consuming a corn-based diet shows that taking a fat- and micronutrient-based food supplement containing phytase, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), arachidonic acid, and lysine for 6 months does not seem to be more effective for reducing anemia than taking the food supplement without phytase (101902).
• Zinc deficiency. Preliminary clinical research shows that adding phytase 20.5 units to a millet-based porridge with added zinc immediately prior to consumption increases zinc absorption by approximately 68% in children aged 12-24 months (101911). Some of these children had low plasma levels of zinc at baseline. However, the use of phytase specifically for the treatment of zinc deficiency has not been investigated. More evidence is needed to rate phytase for these uses.

(Read more about PHYTASE)

Proteolytic enzymes represent a wide group of enzymes that are used alone or in combination. See specific monographs for effectiveness information.

(Read more about PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES))

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when the leaves are used orally and appropriately, short-term (4,6,12).

LIKELY UNSAFE ...when large amounts are used long-term. Chronic ingestion of alfalfa has been associated with drug-induced lupus effects (381,14828,30602).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in medicinal amounts. Alfalfa contains constituents with possible estrogenic activity (4,11,30592).

(Read more about ALFALFA)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Doses up to 240 mg daily have been used safely for up to a year (6252,6253,10622,11457,18281,18284,91104,91105,91106,91111)(96449,103298). Higher doses up to 3200 mg daily have been used safely, short-term (18283,110546). ...when used topically and appropriately. Bromelain has been used safely as a debriding agent for up to 4 hours (18275,91113,103297,108148,108149,113899). Additionally, a retrospective cohort study in critically ill patients with severe burns suggests that use of bromelain as a debriding agent for up to 4 hours is not associated with a greater risk of bacteremia (113899).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about BROMELAIN)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (7555,12928,12946,95817). However, excessive doses should be avoided. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: Age 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51+ years, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stone, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Other clinical studies suggest that, when combined with vitamin D supplementation, calcium supplementation is not associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Other analyses report conflicting results and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day, to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484), and to combine calcium supplementation with vitamin D supplementation (93533).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. The National Academy of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51 years and older, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Other clinical studies suggest that, when combined with vitamin D supplementation, calcium supplementation is not associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Other analyses report conflicting results and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients to not consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day, to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484), and to combine calcium supplementation with vitamin D supplementation (93533).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (17506).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (945,1586,3263,3264,17506). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prescribing oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancy to those with low dietary calcium intake to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the same daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age independent of pregnancy status: 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg (17506). Doses over these amounts might increase the risk of neonatal hypocalcemia-induced seizures possibly caused by transient neonatal hypoparathyroidism in the setting of excessive calcium supplementation during pregnancy, especially during the third trimester. Neonatal hypocalcemia is a risk factor for neonatal seizures (97345).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Carrot essential oil, extracts, and food additives have Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally in medicinal amounts, short-term. Carrot has been used safely in doses of approximately 100 grams three times daily for up to 4 weeks (96308). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of carrot when used topically.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (4912). Carrot essential oil, extracts, and food additives have Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when carrot juices are used excessively in nursing bottles for small children. Excessive use of carrot juice may cause carotenemia and dental caries (25817).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in food (4912). Carrot essential oil, extracts, and food additives have Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of carrot when used in medicinal amounts during pregnancy and lactation.

(Read more about CARROT)

There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of lipase.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase (rhBSSL) is used orally by premature infants. Adding rhBSSL to infant formula or pasteurized breast milk increases the risk for serious gastrointestinal adverse effects in premature infants (101940).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about LIPASE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when peppermint oil is used orally, topically, or rectally in medicinal doses. Peppermint oil has been safely used in multiple clinical trials (3801,3804,6190,6740,6741,10075,12009,13413,14467,17681)(17682,68522,96344,96360,96361,96362,96363,96364,96365,99493).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when peppermint leaf is used orally and appropriately, short-term. There is some clinical research showing that peppermint leaf can be used safely for up to 8 weeks (12724,13413). The long-term safety of peppermint leaf in medicinal doses is unknown. ...when peppermint oil is used by inhalation as aromatherapy (7107). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of using intranasal peppermint oil.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally for medicinal purposes. Enteric-coated peppermint oil capsules have been used with apparent safety under medical supervision in children 8 years of age and older (4469).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (96361). There is insufficient information available about the safety of using peppermint in medicinal amounts during pregnancy or lactation; avoid using.

(Read more about PEPPERMINT)

LIKELY SAFE ...when consumed in the amounts commonly found in foods. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of phytase when used orally as a supplement.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information is available; avoid using.

(Read more about PHYTASE)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Various proteolytic enzymes have been safely used orally in clinical research (716,964,965,968,969,6252,6253,10622,11457,18281,18284) (91104,91105,91106,91111,96449). Side effects are typically mild to moderate and most often include gastrointestinal effects. See specific monographs for more detailed information related to the safety of individual proteolytic enzymes. ...when used topically and appropriately. Various proteolytic enzymes have been safely used topically in clinical research (67835,67843,67845,91113). Some proteolytic enzymes might cause allergic reactions when used topically. See specific monographs for more detailed information related to the safety of individual proteolytic enzymes.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES))

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, alfalfa might increase the risk of hypoglycemia when taken with antidiabetes drugs.  Details Animal research suggests that alfalfa decreases blood sugar in diabetic mice (30605). Also, in one case report, a diabetic patient experienced hypoglycemia after consuming alfalfa extract (30608). Monitor blood glucose levels closely. Dose adjustments might be necessary.

CONTRACEPTIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, alfalfa might interfere with the activity of contraceptive drugs.  Details Alfalfa contains coumestrol, a phytoestrogen, and isoflavonoids, which have estrogenic effects (4,30592).

ESTROGENS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, alfalfa might interfere with hormone therapy.  Details Alfalfa contains coumestrol, a phytoestrogen, and isoflavonoids, which have estrogenic effects (4,30592).

IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, alfalfa might decrease the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy.  Details In vitro research and human case reports suggest that alfalfa may have immunostimulant effects (12174,14828,14829).

PHOTOSENSITIZING DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use of alfalfa with photosensitizing drugs might have additive effects.  Details Animal research suggests that excessive doses of alfalfa may increase photosensitivity, possibly due to its chlorophyll content (106043). It is unclear if this effect would be clinically relevant in humans.

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, alfalfa might reduce the anticoagulant activity of warfarin.  Details Alfalfa contains a large amount of vitamin K (4,6). This could theoretically interfere with the activity of warfarin.

(Read more about ALFALFA)

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Bromelain may have antiplatelet effects and may increase the risk of bleeding if used with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.  Details There is one case report of a patient experiencing minor bruising while taking bromelain with naproxen (14806). Bromelain is thought to have antiplatelet activity (10639,14806,18285,18286,37234). Whether this interaction is of concern with topical bromelain is unclear. Interference with coagulation of burn wounds has been reported in a patient receiving bromelain-based enzymatic debridement. However, observational research has found that topical bromelain debridement is not associated with increases or decreases in laboratory markers of coagulation when compared with surgical debridement (110547).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, bromelain might increase levels of tetracycline antibiotics.  Details Laboratory research suggests that bromelain might increase the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics. However, a study in healthy adults reported no difference in tetracycline plasma levels when a 500 mg dose was taken with or without bromelain 80 mg (14296).

(Read more about BROMELAIN)

ALUMINUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium citrate might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity. Other types of calcium do not increase aluminum absorption.  Details Calcium citrate can increase the absorption of aluminum when taken with aluminum hydroxide. The increase in aluminum levels may become toxic, particularly in individuals with kidney disease (21631). However, the effect of calcium citrate on aluminum absorption is due to the citrate anion rather than calcium cation. Calcium acetate does not appear to increase aluminum absorption (93006).

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.  Details Advise patients to take bisphosphonates at least 30 minutes before calcium, but preferably at a different time of day. Calcium supplements decrease absorption of bisphosphonates (12937).

CALCIPOTRIENE (Dovonex) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Taking calcipotriene with calcium might increase the risk for hypercalcemia.  Details Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (12938). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with calcium supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Intravenous calcium may decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers; oral calcium is unlikely to have this effect.  Details Intravenous calcium is used to decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers in the management of overdose. Intravenous calcium gluconate has been used before intravenous verapamil (Isoptin) to prevent or reduce the hypotensive effects without affecting the antiarrhythmic effects (6124). But there is no evidence that dietary or supplemental calcium when taken orally interacts with calcium channel blockers (12939,12947).

CEFTRIAXONE (Rocephin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Co-administration of intravenous calcium and ceftriaxone can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys.  Details Avoid administering intravenous calcium in any form, such as parenteral nutrition or Lactated Ringers, within 48 hours of intravenous ceftriaxone. Case reports in neonates show that administering intravenous ceftriaxone and calcium can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys. In several cases, neonates have died as a result of this interaction (15794,21632). So far there are no reports in adults; however, there is still concern that this interaction might occur in adults.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Using intravenous calcium with digoxin might increase the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias.  Details Hypercalcemia increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with digoxin (12940). However, one retrospective analysis of clinical data suggests that intravenous calcium does not increase the risk of dysrhythmias or mortality in patients receiving digoxin (38960).

DILTIAZEM (Cardizem, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, calcium might increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of diltiazem.

DOLUTEGRAVIR (Tivicay) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of dolutegravir.  Details Advise patients to take dolutegravir either 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium carbonate 1200 mg concomitantly with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces plasma levels of dolutegravir by almost 40%. Calcium appears to decrease levels of dolutegravir through chelation (93578).

ELVITEGRAVIR (Vitekta) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of elvitegravir.  Details Advise patients to take elvitegravir either 2 hours before or 2 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium along with elvitegravir can reduce blood levels of elvitegravir through chelation (94166).

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption and effectiveness of levothyroxine.  Details Advise patients to take levothyroxine and calcium supplements at least 4 hours apart. Calcium reduces levothyroxine absorption, probably by forming insoluble complexes (5082). Calcium carbonate supplements reduce effectiveness of levothyroxine in patients with hypothyroidism (5081,5082,6137).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use of calcium and lithium may increase this risk of hypercalcemia.  Details Clinical research suggests that long-term use of lithium may cause hypercalcemia in 10% to 60% of patients (38953). Theoretically, concomitant use of lithium and calcium supplements may further increase this risk.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of quinolone antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral quinolones at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements or calcium-fortified foods. Taking calcium at the same time as oral quinolones can reduce quinolone absorption. Calcium binds to quinolones in the gut (4412,10339,21638,38570).

RALTEGRAVIR (Isentress) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium may reduce levels of raltegravir.  Details Pharmacokinetic research shows that taking a single dose of calcium carbonate 3000 mg along with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily modestly decreases the mean area under the curve of raltegravir, but the decrease does not necessitate a dose adjustment of raltegravir (94164). However, a case of elevated HIV-1 RNA levels and documented resistance to raltegravir has been reported for a patient taking calcium carbonate 1 gram three times daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU three times daily in combination with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 11 months. It is thought that calcium reduced raltegravir levels by chelation, leading to treatment failure (94165).

SOTALOL (Betapace) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of sotalol.  Details Advise patients to separate doses by at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium. Calcium appears to reduce the absorption of sotalol, probably by forming insoluble complexes (10018).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral tetracyclines at least 2 hours before, or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements. Taking calcium at the same time as oral tetracyclines can reduce tetracycline absorption. Calcium binds to tetracyclines in the gut (1843).

THIAZIDE DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Taking calcium along with thiazides might increase the risk of hypercalcemia and renal failure.  Details Thiazides reduce calcium excretion by the kidneys (1902). Using thiazides along with moderately large amounts of calcium carbonate increases the risk of milk-alkali syndrome (hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis, renal failure). Patients may need to have their serum calcium levels and/or parathyroid function monitored regularly.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, use of calcium supplements may increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of verapamil.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

(Read more about CARROT)

(Read more about LIPASE)

CYCLOSPORINE (Neoral, Sandimmune) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, peppermint oil might increase the levels and adverse effects of cyclosporine.  Details In animal research, peppermint oil inhibits cyclosporine metabolism and increases cyclosporine levels. Inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) may be partially responsible for this interaction (11784). An interaction between peppermint oil and cyclosporine has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, peppermint might increase the levels of CYP1A2 substrates.  Details In vitro and animal research shows that peppermint oil and peppermint leaf inhibit CYP1A2 (12479,12734). However, in clinical research, peppermint tea did not significantly affect the metabolism of caffeine, a CYP1A2 substrate. It is possible that the 6-day duration of treatment may have been too short to identify a difference (96359).

CYTOCHROME P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, peppermint might increase the levels of CYP2C19 substrates.  Details In vitro research shows that peppermint oil inhibits CYP2C19 (12479). So far, this interaction has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, peppermint might increase the levels of CYP2C9 substrates.  Details In vitro research shows that peppermint oil inhibits CYP2C9 (12479). So far, this interaction has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, peppermint might increase the levels of CYP3A4 substrates.  Details Clinical research in healthy volunteers shows that a single dose of peppermint oil 600 mg inhibits CYP3A4 enzymes and increases the AUC of felodipine, a CYP3A4 substrate (11783). However, in vitro research suggests that peppermint oil only inhibits CYP3A4 at very high concentrations (12479).

(Read more about PEPPERMINT)

(Read more about PHYTASE)

(Read more about PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES))

General ...Orally, alfalfa leaf seems to be well tolerated. However, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal discomfort, diarrhea, and flatulence.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Lupus-like syndrome after chronic ingestion of alfalfa.

Dermatologic ...Dermatitis associated with alfalfa use has been reported. In a 1954 publication, dermatitis was noted in a 61-year-old female consuming 4-6 cups of tea made with two tablespoonfuls of alfalfa seeds for approximately two months prior to onset. Examination revealed diffuse, confluent edema and erythema on the face, eyelids, ears, hands, forearms, and distal humeral regions. The dermatitis improved with treatment; re-exposure to alfalfa resulted in a similar reaction (30609).

Endocrine ...Alfalfa contains constituents, including coumestrol, with reported estrogenic activity (30586,30592,4753). Effects in humans are not known.
One case report documents hypokalemia in a female who had been drinking a "cleansing tea" containing alfalfa, licorice, and stinging nettle. The potassium level returned to normal after discontinuing the tea and initiating potassium supplementation. The specific cause of the hypokalemia is not clear. Notably, both stinging nettle and licorice have been associated with hypokalemia and may have been responsible for this effect (30562).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, flatulence and bulkier feces were reported during the first week of a case series of three subjects ingesting alfalfa (30598). In a case series of 15 patients ingesting alfalfa, increased fecal volume and increased stool frequency was reported. Additional adverse effects included abdominal discomfort in two patients, diarrhea in two patients, loose stools in six patients, and intestinal gas in 13 patients (5816).

Hematologic ...Pancytopenia and splenomegaly were reported in a 59-year-old male who had been taking 80-160 grams of ground alfalfa seeds for up to six weeks at a time, for a five month period. Hematologic values and spleen size returned to normal when alfalfa was discontinued (381).

Other ...Alfalfa products, including sprouts, seeds, and tablets, have been found to be contaminated with Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes, which have caused documented infections (5600,30566,30568,30572,30569,30564,30604,30610,30563,30607) (30566,30564,30604,30610,30563,30607,30576).
Orally, alfalfa has been associated with the development of a lupus-like syndrome in animals and humans (30594,14828,14830,30602), as well as with possible exacerbations of lupus in patients with known systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). These reactions may be associated with the amino acid L-canavanine (30594), which appears to be present in alfalfa seeds and sprouts, but not leaves, and therefore should not be present in alfalfa tablets manufactured from the leaves (30601). However, case reports have included individuals ingesting tablets. A lupus-like syndrome was described in four patients taking 12-24 alfalfa tablets per day. Symptoms included arthralgias, myalgias, and rash; positive antinuclear antibodies (ANA) arose anywhere from three weeks to seven months after initiating alfalfa therapy. Upon discontinuation of alfalfa tablets, all four patients became asymptomatic. In two patients, ANA levels normalized (14828). Two additional reports have documented possible exacerbation or induction of SLE associated with alfalfa use. One case involved a female with a 26-year history of SLE, who had been taking 15 tablets of alfalfa daily for nine months prior to an exacerbation. Because of the delay in onset of the exacerbation from the initiation of alfalfa therapy, causation cannot be clearly established (30575). In a different report, SLE and arthritis were found in multiple family members who had been taking a combination of vitamin E and alfalfa tablets for seven years (30602). It is not known what other environmental or genetic factors may have affected these individuals, and the association with alfalfa is unclear.

(Read more about ALFALFA)

General ...Orally, bromelain seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Diarrhea, flatulence, gastric upset, headache.
Topically: Pruritus, urticaria.

Dermatologic ...Topically, bromelain may cause dermal allergic reactions including urticaria, pruritus, and skin swelling (9184). Redness, swelling, burning, pain at the application site, and cellulitis have also been reported rarely (108148,113513). In one case, a fixed drug eruption with pruritis near the groin was reported in a 33-year-old male taking bromelain 50 mg orally daily for 10 days. After discontinuation of bromelain and treatment with topical corticosteroid, the lesion resolved. Upon re-challenge with bromelain, the lesion reappeared in the same area (103300).
In another case report, a 61-year-old male with a history of chronic lower leg ulceration secondary to chronic venous hypertension and recurrent deep vein thrombosis on rivaroxaban presented with a deep-dermal burn on his lower calf. Bromelain-based topical enzymatic debridement agent Nexobrid 2 grams was applied to the burn site. Thirty minutes later, the patient experienced two instances of hemorrhage at the site of debridement. The patient was stabilized and treated with fluids, packed red cells, and tranexamic acid, and then the Nexobrid was removed (111656). Caution should be used in patients with underlying coagulopathies.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, bromelain may cause gastrointestinal disturbances, including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, flatulence, and abdominal pain (9184,18274,18282,96216,113513).

Immunologic ...Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic reactions to bromelain may occur (9184).
If inhaled, bromelain may cause sensitization and allergic reactions such as asthma (37199,37215,37233). In case reports of occupational inhalation of bromelain, additional allergic symptoms included difficulty swallowing, throat itching, eye irritation, and rhinitis (37214).

(Read more about BROMELAIN)

General ...Orally and intravenously, calcium is well-tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Belching, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, and stomach upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about calciphylaxis and kidney stones.

Cardiovascular ...There has been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these results, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and CVD, CHD, or MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482). To minimize the possible risk of CVD, CHD, or MI, advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). While dietary intake of calcium is preferred over supplemental intake, advise patients who require calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D, as this combination does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI (93533).
Rarely, calcium intake can increase the risk of calciphylaxis, which usually occurs in patients with kidney failure. Calciphylaxis is the deposition of calcium phosphate in arterioles, which causes skin ulcers and skin necrosis. In a case report, a 64-year-old female with a history of neck fracture, sepsis, and ischemic colitis presented with painful leg ulcers due to calciphylaxis. She discontinued calcium and vitamin D supplementation and was treated with sodium thiosulfate and supportive care (95816).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, calcium can cause belching, flatulence, nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, and diarrhea (1824,1843,12950,38803). Although constipation is frequently cited as an adverse effect of calcium, there is no scientific substantiation of this side effect (1824,1843,1844,1845,12950,38978). Calcium carbonate has been reported to cause acid rebound, but this is controversial (12935,12936).

Oncologic ...There is some concern that very high doses of calcium might increase the risk of prostate cancer. Some epidemiological evidence suggests that consuming over 2000 mg/day of dietary calcium might increase the risk for prostate cancer (4825,12949). Additional research suggests that calcium intake over 1500 mg/day might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer and prostate cancer mortality (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a small increase in prostate cancer risk (98894). However, contradictory research suggests no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall prostate cancer risk (14131,14132,104630). More evidence is needed to determine the effect of calcium, if any, on prostate cancer risk.

Renal ...Kidney stones have been reported in individuals taking calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily in combination with vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 4 years (93943).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

General ...Orally, carrot is well tolerated when consumed as a food. It also seems to be generally well-tolerated when consumed as a medicine. Some people are allergic to carrot; allergic symptoms include anaphylactic, cutaneous, respiratory, and gastrointestinal reactions such as hives, swelling of the larynx, asthma, or diarrhea (25820,93606,106560). In infants, excessive consumption of carrot products in nursing bottles has been reported to cause extensive caries in the primary teeth (25817).
Topically, carrot has been associated with a case of phytophotodermatitis (101716).

Dental ...Orally, feeding carrot juice to infants, with or without sugar- or acid-containing beverages, has been reported to damage teeth and cause dental caries (25817).

Dermatologic ...Orally, excessive consumption of carrots or carrot-containing products can cause yellowing of the skin, which results from increased beta-carotene levels in the blood (25817). Carrots may cause allergic reactions in some patients. Allergic responses to carrot-containing foods include skin reactions such as hives, erythema, swelling, and/or papules (25820,96306).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, carrots may cause allergic reactions in some patients. Allergic responses to carrot-containing foods can include gastrointestinal symptoms, such as diarrhea (25820).

Immunologic ...Orally, carrots may cause allergic reactions in some patients (25820,96306,106560). Allergic responses to carrot-containing foods can include skin reactions such as hives, erythema, swelling, and/or papules (25820,96306). For one patient, treatment of skin lesions resolved after a month of oral antihistamines and topical steroids, and avoiding further contact with carrot (96306). Allergic responses to carrot-containing foods can also include gastrointestinal symptoms, such as diarrhea, and respiratory symptoms, such as swelling of the larynx or asthma (25820). In one case, a patient with a history of allergic rhinitis and asthma who had been successfully treated with subcutaneous immunotherapy and was tolerant of consumption of raw and cooked carrots developed rhinoconjunctivitis when handling carrots. Inhalation of dust particles and aerosols produced by food processing activities and containing allergens from the peel and pulp of carrots is thought to have sensitized the airway, producing a distinct form of respiratory food allergy in which there are typically no symptoms with ingestion (106560).
Topically, a female runner developed phytophotodermatitis, which was considered possibly associated with the inclusion of carrot in a sunscreen (Yes To Carrots Daily Facial Moisturizer with SPF 15; Yes to, Inc.) (101716).

Psychiatric ...Compulsive carrot eating is a rare condition in which the patient craves carrots. According to one case report, withdrawal symptoms include nervousness, cravings, insomnia, water brash, and irritability (25821).

(Read more about CARROT)

General ...No adverse effects have been reported in adults. However, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as necrotizing enterocolitis, when recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase is used in premature infants.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, when added to the formula or pasteurized breast milk consumed by premature infants, recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase (rhBSSL) can cause gastrointestinal adverse effects, including abdominal distension, flatulence, constipation, colic, abdominal pain, gastroenteritis, vomiting, regurgitation, and rectal bleeding (101940). Premature infants receiving rhBSSL also had a slightly higher rate of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) when compared with those receiving placebo. After review by a panel of experts, it was determined that the rate of confirmed or suspected NEC in infants consuming rhBSSL was 3.3%, compared with 0.5% in those receiving placebo. Although this rate of NEC is lower than the historical rate of occurrence in premature infants (11%), a possible increased risk for NEC cannot be ruled out (101940).

(Read more about LIPASE)

General ...Orally, topically, or rectally, peppermint oil is generally well tolerated. Inhaled, peppermint oil seems to be well tolerated. Intranasally, no adverse effects have been reported. However, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted. Orally, peppermint leaf seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, anal burning, belching, diarrhea, dry mouth, heartburn, nausea, and vomiting.
Topically: Burning, dermatitis, irritation, and redness.

Dermatologic ...Topically, peppermint oil can cause skin irritation, burning, erythema, and contact dermatitis (3802,11781,31528,43338,68473,68457,68509,96361,96362). Also, a case of severe mucosal injury has been reported for a patient who misused an undiluted over the counter mouthwash that contained peppermint and arnica oil in 70% alcohol (19106).
In large amounts, peppermint oil may cause chemical burns when used topically or orally. A case of multiple burns in the oral cavity and pharynx, along with edema of the lips, tongue, uvula, and soft palate, has been reported for a 49-year-old female who ingested 40 drops of pure peppermint oil. Following treatment with intravenous steroids and antibiotics, the patient's symptoms resolved over the course of 2 weeks (68432). Also, a case of chemical burns on the skin and skin necrosis has been reported for a 35-year-old male who spilled undiluted peppermint oil on a previous skin graft (68572). Oral peppermint oil has also been associated with burning mouth syndrome and chronic mouth ulceration in people with contact sensitivity to peppermint (6743). Also, excessive consumption of mint candies containing peppermint oil has been linked to cases of stomatitis (13114).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, peppermint oil can cause heartburn, nausea and vomiting, anal or perianal burning, abdominal pain, belching, dry mouth, diarrhea, and increased appetite (3803,6740,6741,6742,10075,11779,11789,17682,68497,68514)(68532,68544,96344,96360,102602,104219,107955). Enteric-coated capsules might help to reduce the incidence of heartburn (3802,4469,6740,11777). However, in one clinical study, a specific enteric-coated formulation of peppermint oil (Pepogest; Nature's Way) taken as 180 mg three times daily was associated with a higher rate of adverse effects when compared with placebo (48% versus 31%, respectively). Specifically, of the patients consuming this product, 11% experienced belching and 26% experienced heartburn, compared to 2% and 12%, respectively, in the placebo group (107955). A meta-analysis of eight small clinical studies in patients with irritable bowel syndrome shows that taking enteric-coated formulations of peppermint oil increases the risk of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms by 67% when compared with a control group (109980). Enteric-coated capsules can also cause anal burning in people with reduced bowel transit time (11782,11789).

Genitourinary ...Orally, a sensitive urethra has been reported rarely (102602).

Hepatic ...One case of hepatocellular liver injury has been reported following the oral use of peppermint. Symptoms included elevated liver enzymes, fatigue, jaundice, dark urine, and signs of hypersensitivity. Details on the dosage and type of peppermint consumed were unavailable (96358).

Immunologic ...One case of IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, characterized by sudden onset of lip and tongue swelling, tightness of throat, and shortness of breath, has been reported in a 69-year-old male who consumed peppermint candy (89479). An allergic reaction after use of peppermint oil in combination with caraway oil has been reported in a patient with a history of bronchial asthma (96344). It is not clear if this reaction occurred in response to the peppermint or caraway components.

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, headache has been reported rarely (102602).

Ocular/Otic ...Orally, peppermint has been reported to cause blurry vision (3803).

(Read more about PEPPERMINT)

General ...Orally, no adverse effects have been reported. However, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted. Workplace immunological responses to airborne powdered phytase have been reported (101901,101908,101909,101910).

Immunologic ...There are numerous reports of immunologic responses to airborne powdered phytase in the animal-feed industry (101901,101908,101909,101910). Examples of reactions include allergic occupational asthma and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (101901,101908). In one case report of a 43-year-old male, hypersensitivity pneumonitis related to phytase was diagnosed following a 6-month history of coughing, shortness of breath, fever, and dyspnea (101908). In an analysis of 53 people occupationally exposed to phytase, 28% had IgE antibodies and 45% had IgG antibodies specific to phytase. Symptoms included dyspnea, rhinitis, and eye and skin reactions (101909). In another analysis of patients with IgE-mediated occupational respiratory allergy, wheezing, chest tightness, shortness of breath, cough, and asthmatic symptoms were reported (101910).

(Read more about PHYTASE)

General ...Orally, proteolytic enzymes are generally well tolerated. See specific monographs for detailed safety information related to individual proteolytic enzymes.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Gastrointestinal upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Topically: Allergic reactions.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, some patients taking proteolytic enzymes may have gastrointestinal complaints (101517).

Immunologic ...Proteolytic enzymes are commonly found in laundry detergents and pre-spotter products. Rarely, protease specific IgE positive tests possibly related to these products have occurred. Exposure may be airborne or topical (102705). In addition, in case reports, occupational exposure to the airborne proteolytic enzyme pepsin has resulted in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis or asthma (102706,102707).

(Read more about PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES))