Energize & Burn Fruit Punch by GNC Total Lean

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. In some adults, taking beta-alanine appears to improve some, but not all, measures of athletic performance. Beta-alanine appears to work better for exercises that lasts at least 1 minute in duration; however, many other factors likely alter efficacy, such as the type of exercise, the subject's training experience, and the dosing regimen. Details: Many small clinical trials have evaluated the effects of beta-alanine supplementation in untrained individuals, recreational athletes, and professional athletes in a variety of sports and activities, including running, cycling, swimming, basketball, football, soccer, rowing, water polo, wrestling, weight lifting, skiing, and others. However, the results of individual trials are conflicting. Furthermore, studies have included multiple endpoints that have been both lab-based, such as time to exhaustion, strength endurance, time trials, and power output, and field-based, such as performance times (18227,94333,94334,94335,94336,94337,94338,94339,94340,94341)(94342,94343,94345,94346,94347,94348,94349,97956,97958,97960)(97962,97969,97970,97971,97972,101027,101028,101029,101030,104144)(104145,106710,106711,106713,106717,106718,112794). Meta-analyses of clinical trials show that taking beta-alanine 2-6.4 grams orally daily for 3-12 weeks provides minor improvements in exercise capacity and performance when compared with control (18227,94357,106717). In one meta-analysis, exercise capacity improved by an average of approximately 3% when compared with placebo (18227). However, meta-analyses suggest that improvements in exercise performance are less than exercise capacity (18227,94357). The majority of this research has only included males. Preliminary clinical research assessing the effect of beta-alanine on exercise capacity in females has not consistently demonstrated a benefit. However, the validity of these studies is limited by small sample sizes (14611,94338,94339,94345,97957,97967,104144,112791). Preliminary clinical research also suggests that beta-alanine is more effective for short exercises, lasting at least 1 minute. Longer exercises, lasting more than 10 minutes, have not been well studied. In addition, the type of athlete and type of exercise most likely to benefit from beta-alanine supplementation is unclear (18227,94357,106717). Pooled analyses have not identified the most effective dose of beta-alanine; however, preliminary subgroup analyses suggest that prolonged supplementation of at least 3-6 weeks may be needed to gain benefits (94357,106717). There does not seem to be a relationship between the daily beta-alanine dose and exercise-related outcomes, although one analysis suggests outcomes may be related to the total cumulative dose; most studies have used a total daily dose of 2.4-6.4 grams (18227,94357,101026,101027,101028,101029,101030,106712,106717). The majority of studies have evaluated various marketed formulations of beta-alanine (Carnosyn, Natural Alternatives International; Sustained Release Beta-Alanine, Musashi; Balance 100% unflavored pure beta-alanine, Vitaco Health; Intra X cell, Athletics Edge Nutrition) (94333,94335,94336,94337,94339,94342,94346,94347,94348,94349)(101028,101029,101030,104144,106710,106711,106718). Beta-alanine has also been studied in combination with 1 additional ingredient, namely sodium bicarbonate or creatine. Preliminary clinical research in physically active or trained males shows that taking beta-alanine 6-6.4 grams orally daily for 4-6 weeks with sodium bicarbonate 300-500 mg/kg orally daily for 1-7 days does not increase exercise capacity or exercise performance while cycling or sprinting when compared with individual supplementation (97959,97964,97966,101028). In contrast, preliminary clinical research in male athletes participating in martial arts or rowing shows that taking beta-alanine with sodium bicarbonate modestly increases exercise performance when compared with either ingredient taken alone (97962,97963). Other preliminary clinical research in healthy, untrained males shows that taking beta-alanine 1.6 grams daily for 28 days with creatine 5 grams twice daily for 22 days, followed by four times daily for 6 days, modestly increases power output during cycling when compared with placebo or taking either supplement alone (97973). In another very small clinical study in trained military males, taking beta-alanine 6.4 grams daily for 28 days with creatine 0.3 grams/kg daily for the last 7 days improves leg muscle power but not anaerobic power or muscle strength when compared with beta-alanine plus placebo (112793). Beta-alanine has also been studied in combination with multiple other ingredients. Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific product containing beta-alanine, creatine monohydrate, arginine, alpha-ketoisocaproate, and leucine (NO-Shotgun) or a different product containing beta-alanine, L-histidine, and carnosine (BETAFOR3MAX, Martinez Nieto S.A.) for 28 or 7 days, respectively, also improves strength and power output when compared with placebo (34451,106714). However, another very small crossover clinical study in healthy males shows that taking 6 mg/kg of a multi-ingredient pre-workout supplement containing beta-alanine, L-tyrosine, L-citrulline maleate, arginine alpha-ketoglutarate, L-taurine, and caffeine 30 minutes prior to weight training does not increase bench press strength endurance when compared with an equivalent amount of anhydrous caffeine (111250). It is unclear if these effects are due to beta-alanine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Physical performance. Preliminary clinical research shows that taking beta-alanine improves exercise capacity and fatigue, but not strength or exercise performance, in older adults. Details: Clinical research in older adults shows that taking beta-alanine 2.4-3.2 grams daily for 4-12 weeks increases exercise capacity and delays fatigue during exercise when compared with placebo (16442,97955,97965). In addition, preliminary clinical research in older adults shows that taking an oral nutritional supplement fortified with beta-alanine 0.8-1.2 grams twice daily for 12 weeks increases exercise capacity when compared with taking the oral nutritional supplement alone (97961). Taking beta-alanine 2.4 grams daily also minimizes the reduction of executive functioning after cycling in older adults when compared with placebo (97955). However, 2 clinical studies in older adults show that taking beta-alanine (Natural Alternatives International) 2.4-3.2 grams daily for 10-12 weeks with or without an endurance-based resistance-training program does not improve strength, power, fatigue, or performance when compared with the resistance training program alone or placebo (101031,112792).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral beta-alanine is beneficial for cognitive decline in older adults. Details: A small clinical study in older adults shows that taking beta-alanine 1200 mg twice daily for 10 weeks reduces symptoms of depression and might improve cognitive function in subjects with borderline or low cognitive function at baseline when compared with placebo. However, beta-alanine supplementation does not improve cognitive function in older adults with normal cognitive function at baseline and does not benefit mood, anxiety, or executive function when compared with placebo (112792).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral beta-alanine improves physical function in people with COPD. Details: A small clinical study in adults with COPD shows that taking beta-alanine (SR CarnoSyn, Natural Alternatives International, Inc) 800 mg four times daily for 12 weeks does not improve exercise capacity, muscle function, or physical activity when compared with placebo (112790).
• Cognitive function. Oral beta-alanine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in trained military males shows that taking beta-alanine 6.4 grams daily for 28 days with creatine 0.3 grams/kg daily for the last 7 days modestly improves mathematical processing when compared to baseline, but not when compared with beta-alanine plus placebo. However, improvement from baseline was not found in the group taking beta-alanine plus placebo (112793).
• Exercise-induced muscle breakdown. It is unclear if oral beta-alanine improves muscle recovery after exercise. Details: Preliminary clinical research in untrained adults shows that taking beta-alanine 4.8 grams orally daily for 4 weeks does not improve muscle recovery after resistance exercises when compared with placebo (101026).
• Menopausal symptoms. Although there has been interest in using oral beta-alanine for menopausal symptoms, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of beta-alanine for this purpose.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral beta-alanine improves body composition in adults. Details: A meta-analysis of several small clinical studies in active and sedentary adults shows that supplementing with beta-alanine 1.6-6.4 grams daily for 3-10 weeks does not reduce body mass, fat mass, body fat percentage, or free fat mass when compared with various controls. Subgroup analysis of dose, duration, and type of additional training did not change the results (112789).
• Sarcopenia. Although there has been interest in using oral beta-alanine for sarcopenia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of beta-alanine for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate beta-alanine for these uses.

(Read more about BETA-ALANINE)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for allergic rhinitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
• Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
• Athletic performance. Oral black pepper has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical trial in untrained males shows that taking a supplement containing black pepper extract 10 mg, caffeine 400 mg, capsicum extract 66.7 mg, and niacin 40 mg as a single dose prior to exercise does not improve strength, time to exhaustion, or maximal oxygen consumption when compared with placebo (37873).
• Depression. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
• Diarrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for diarrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
• Dysmenorrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for dysmenorrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
• Dyspepsia. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for dyspepsia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if inhaling black pepper oil as aromatherapy is beneficial for fall prevention in older adults. Details: One small clinical study in older adults shows that applying black pepper oil near the right side of the nose as an olfactory stimulant improves stability while the eyes are closed during a one-minute trial when compared with the application of water. The improvement with black pepper oil is comparable to the improvement seen with the application of lavender oil (29160). It is unclear if any benefit persists after inhalation of black pepper oil.
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral black pepper is beneficial in patients with fatigue. Details: One small clinical trial in adults with below-average energy levels shows that taking black pepper 2 grams as a single dose does not improve sustained attention, motivation to perform cognitive tasks, or feelings of mental energy and mental fatigue when compared with placebo (91731).
• Flatulence. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for flatulence, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
• Headache. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for headache, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
• Insect bite. Topical black pepper has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical trial shows that applying a specific product (Trikatu) containing black pepper, long pepper, and ginger, as well as camphor, eucalyptus oil, and menthol, directly to mosquito bites does not reduce papule size, erythema, edema, or pruritis when compared with a control compound containing the same base ingredients but without the pepper and ginger components (89893).
• Obesity. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for obesity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
• Pain (chronic). Although there has been interest in using topical black pepper for chronic pain related to various etiologies, including osteoarthritis, postherpetic neuralgia, and peripheral neuropathy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for these conditions.
• Rhinosinusitis. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for rhinosinusitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
• Sexual desire. Although there has been interest in using oral black pepper for increasing sexual desire, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of black pepper for this purpose.
• Smoking cessation. It is unclear if inhaling black pepper essential oil as aromatherapy is effective for smoking cessation. Details: One small clinical trial in adult male smokers who were deprived from smoking overnight shows that inhaling a vapor from the essential oil of black pepper, as needed over a 3-hour period, reduces cigarette cravings, negative feelings, and anxiety when compared with a placebo vapor (29159). Another small clinical study in patients addicted to dipping, chewing, or smoking tobacco shows that placing a drop of black pepper essential oil on tissue paper and inhaling for 2 minutes at least three times a day for 3 days reduces nicotine cravings when compared to baseline (90502).
• Swallowing dysfunction. It is unclear if inhaling black pepper oil as aromatherapy is beneficial in patients with swallowing dysfunction. Details: One small clinical study in post-stroke residents of nursing homes shows that one minute of olfactory stimulation with black pepper oil before each meal for 30 days decreases swallowing reflex latency by 11 seconds and increases the number of swallowing movements by 3.3 when compared to baseline (29161). A small clinical trial in children with neurological disorders who were on long-term enteral nutrition shows that applying black pepper oil to the nostrils or nasal cavity for one minute improves the amount of oral intake and swallowing movement in 63% of patients. Although oral intake increased, the need for enteral nutrition was not eliminated (29162).
• Vitiligo. It is unclear if topical piperine oil, a constituent of black pepper, is beneficial in patients with vitiligo. Details: A small clinical study in patients with vitiligo shows that applying piperine oil 1% daily in addition to receiving narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) light therapy every other day for 3 months improves repigmentation more rapidly when compared with using NB-UVB alone (103820). More evidence is needed to rate black pepper for these uses.

(Read more about BLACK PEPPER)

EFFECTIVE

• Migraine headache. Oral caffeine in combination with acetaminophen, aspirin, and/or sumatriptan is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating migraine headache. Details: Taking caffeine 100-260 mg orally in combination with acetaminophen 500-2000 mg, aspirin 500 mg, and/or sumatriptan 50-100 mg is effective for treating migraine headache (2715,2716,2717,37614,37626,37816,91068). Some evidence shows that caffeine in combination with aspirin and acetaminophen may be more effective than sumatriptan in treating a migraine attack (37666). However, taking caffeine 200 mg plus ergotamine seems to be less effective than sumatriptan or calcium carbasalate plus metoclopramide (37685,38312). Caffeine is an FDA-approved product for use with analgesics for the treatment of migraine.
• Neonatal apnea. Oral or intravenous caffeine citrate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the short-term treatment of neonatal apnea in very preterm infants. Details: Using caffeine orally or intravenously improves apnea of prematurity in very preterm infants and reduces the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, invasive mechanical ventilation, and neurodevelopmental impairment (6023,6371,37857,37906,38124,38344,98807,100364,114658). The dosage approved in the FDA labeling is a single loading dose of caffeine citrate 20 mg/kg (10 mg/kg caffeine base), followed by 5 mg/kg of caffeine citrate (2.5 mg/kg caffeine base) every 24 hours for maintenance. Clinical research shows that caffeine citrate dose-dependently reduces the number of apnea episodes by at least 50% over 7-10 days of treatment (6371). Most research suggests that doses above 10 mg/kg daily reduce the risk of apnea, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and problematic extubation when compared with doses below 10 mg/kg/day (98807,100364,114658). Additional clinical research shows that reinitiating caffeine treatment after termination of the original caffeine regimen, and continuing until 40 weeks postmenstrual age, reduces the incidence of intermittent hypoxia in premature infants by 46% when compared to standard care (91073). At 18-21 months of age, a history of neonatal caffeine treatment reduces the risk of long-term complications of apnea of prematurity, such as cerebral palsy or cognitive delay (37722,38340). At 11 years of age, individuals born prematurely and treated with caffeine have improved visuomotor, visuoperceptual, and visuospatial abilities when compared to those who received placebo (97452). At 6-11 years of age, these individuals may also have a reduced risk of motor impairment (114658). Data on the prophylactic use of caffeine in very low birth-weight infants (less than 1500 grams and 32 weeks' gestation) are conflicting. In a meta-analysis of 11 studies, 5 show a reduced risk of apnea of prematurity, oxygen therapy, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, patent ductus arteriosus, and retinopathy of prematurity, and a reduced duration of mechanical ventilation (111491). However, other studies do not show any benefit (38125,111491). A study of infants born at 34-36 weeks' gestation shows that caffeine citrate, 10 or 20 mg/kg orally daily, reduces the number of intermittent hypoxemia episodes per hour by 61% and 67% respectively, when compared with placebo (111493). Caffeine and aminophylline have similar effectiveness for management of apnea, bradycardia, and hypoxemia, but caffeine has a wider range of safe plasma levels and lower rates of tachycardia and feeding intolerance (111492).
• Postoperative headache. Oral or intravenous caffeine is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing headache in postoperative patients who regularly consume caffeinated products. Details: Clinical research shows that using caffeine is effective for preventing postoperative headache in patients who regularly consume caffeinated products. Intravenous caffeine does not seem to be effective in non-regular caffeine consumers. Studied doses have included 200 mg intravenously or oral doses calculated based on average daily consumption (2725,2726). Caffeine is an FDA-approved product for preventing headache in postoperative patients who regularly consume caffeinated products.
• Tension headache. Oral caffeine in combination with analgesics is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating tension headache. Details: Taking caffeine orally in combination with analgesics is effective for treating simple tension headache. Taking caffeine 100 mg alone is more effective at reducing tension headache pain when compared with placebo, but less effective than the combination of caffeine and analgesics. Caffeine 130 mg has been used with acetaminophen 1000 mg or with acetaminophen 500 mg and aspirin 500 mg. Caffeine 50 mg has been used with acetylsalicylic acid 250 mg and acetaminophen 200 mg (2718,11832,37668,37773).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral caffeine taken as a single dose of at least 2-3 mg/kg can modestly improve endurance, muscle strength, power output, and overall athletic performance when taken prior to certain forms of athletic activity or exercise. However, the magnitude and duration of effect is variable and may be dependent on the form and dose of caffeine, as well as various individual- and activity-specific factors. Caffeine intake in excess of 800 mg daily can result in blood levels greater than those allowed by the National Collegiate Athletic Association. Details: Clinical research and meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking caffeine 2-10 mg/kg modestly improves work produced, aerobic endurance, muscle strength and endurance, power output, and overall athletic performance (10203,11832,37648,37894,38054,38063,95955,100362,100365,100371)(103701,103703,108798,111250,114655,114657,114661,114673). According to the International Society of Sports Nutrition, the most consistent and measurable effects are seen in aerobic endurance; the minimal effective dose for any form of exercise is unclear, but benefits have been most consistent at doses of 3-6 mg/kg (114673). Meta-analyses of studies using caffeine 3-9 mg/kg as a single dose prior to endurance time trials report variability in results. Sports studied included running, rowing, cycling, swimming, and Nordic skiing, and included both recreational and trained athletes. Overall there was a small positive effect on time to exhaustion, endurance performance, and mean power output, and a decrease in the time needed to complete the trials when compared with placebo (98808,111497,114655). One meta-analysis of studies that evaluated cycling time trial performance found that doses of 4-6 mg/kg, but not doses of 1-3 mg/kg, improved performance (114655). A separate meta-analysis of 14 clinical studies shows that taking caffeine 2-11 mg/kg approximately 45-60 minutes before exercise improves muscle strength and endurance in the upper and lower body when compared with placebo. However, a sub-group analysis shows that muscle strength only improves with caffeine doses of at least 6 mg/kg (114657). Another meta-analysis of small clinical trials shows that the benefit of caffeine on athletic performance seems to increase with increased duration of activity. This suggests that caffeine can improve physical endurance during athletic activities (100371). In these trials, caffeine is typically provided as a single dose 30-150 minutes prior to testing (98808), although one study suggests that taking caffeine 60 minutes prior to peak activity has the most consistent ergogenic benefits (104577). Caffeine might improve performance in some athletic activities but not others. Some research shows that caffeine does not improve performance during athletic activities requiring a high amount of exertion over a short period of time. Such activities include sprinting and lifting (11832,37564,37758,37837,37841,37890,38319,95963,97459,112740). However, it is possible that the negative lifting studies were underpowered. Ballistic exercise, such as jumping or throwing, requires rapid increases in velocity, force, and muscle activation. A meta-analysis of 10 studies shows that caffeine in a range of doses (mean: 3 mg/kg) has a significant ergogenic effect on throwing performance and velocity (111488). A meta-analysis of small studies shows that caffeine modestly improves bench press repetitions and maximum strength, but not perceived exertion, when compared with placebo. Caffeine also tends to improve these parameters for leg presses, but the improvement does not reach significance when compared with placebo (103701). A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in female team-sport athletes shows that caffeine improves specific team-sport skills but has no effect on perceived exertion or agility tests performed after exertion (108799). Conversely, a small individual clinical study shows that taking caffeine 6.5 mg/kg 60 minutes before strength training decreases perceived exertion while increasing the number of repetitions of both upper and lower limb exercises by 17% to 33% over placebo (104581). Some clinical research also shows that taking caffeine can decrease subjective feelings of exertion and fatigue during exercise such as fencing and cycling (17618,37656,91026,91058,91062). Although some other clinical studies show that caffeine does not affect perceived exertion, caffeine does seem to improve performance and cause small increases in the amount of physical work done when compared with placebo in various athletes, including cyclists, runners, basketball players, and golfers (37702,37860,37872,38031,38119,38320,91037,91077,97457,97459)(104580,108800,108804). These effects do not seem to be dependent upon the dose of caffeine (97459), although some research shows that the timing of caffeine intake and exercise may alter overall benefit, with a greater effect seen in the morning compared to the evening (97457,104580). Most research has investigated the acute effects of a single dose of caffeine. The evidence is mixed as to whether chronic intake of caffeine could induce tolerance and reduce any acute ergogenic benefits (114673). One study shows that the consistent consumption of caffeine 3 mg/kg daily for 28 days eliminates the acute benefits of caffeine in work produced when compared with placebo, suggesting the development of tolerance (95955). However, chronic use of caffeine at a dose of 6 mg/kg for 4 days does not seem to induce tolerance to an acute dose of caffeine 6 mg/kg taken 60 minutes prior to a cycling time trial in males who are moderate to high users of caffeine (104576). Similarly, a small clinical study in trained individuals shows that acute supplementation with oral caffeine 6 mg/kg about 1 hour prior to performance improves strength and endurance when compared with placebo or control, regardless of habitual caffeine consumption (108804). Differences may be due to the type of exercise, the acute dose of caffeine, the length of the chronic intake period, and/or the normal caffeine intake of the athlete. Most studies suggest that there is significant inter-individual variability in response to caffeine for improvement of athletic performance (100365). These differences might be due, at least in part, to genotype (100370,114673), although research is conflicting. Caffeine is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) enzyme. One small clinical trial in resistance-trained males shows that taking caffeine 6 mg/kg improves resistance exercise performance in those homozygous for the CYP1A2 rs762551 polymorphism (AA) when compared with those without or heterozygous for that polymorphism (CC or A/C, respectively) (100370). However, another clinical study in trained male athletes shows that taking oral caffeine 4 mg/kg about 30 minutes prior to performance decreases handgrip strength by about 13% in individuals with the CC genotype when compared with placebo, but not in those with the AA or A/C genotypes. No groups experienced an improvement in vertical jump performance (108803). Another small clinical study suggests that CYP1A2 genotype does not affect exercise performance in athletes 60 minutes after taking caffeine 3 mg/kg. In addition, the ADORA2A genotype, which plays a role in caffeine sensitivity, does not seem to affect exercise performance benefits from caffeine (104578). However, these studies are small and used different performance protocols; further research is needed to clarify how these polymorphisms may impact the athletic performance benefits of caffeine (114673). Limited research has also evaluated the use of a caffeine mouth rinse, with mixed findings. Two very small clinical studies in healthy trained males shows that rinsing the mouth with 25 mL of water containing caffeine 85 or 300 mg for 5-10 seconds does not affect athletic performance or time to exhaustion while cycling when compared with placebo (103709,108801). However, another small study in healthy Taekwondo athletes fasting for Ramadan suggests that using a mouth rinse containing caffeine 6 mg/kg, ten seconds prior to exertion, modestly reduces perceived exertion and modestly improves kick performance when compared with using a placebo rinse (103710). Similarly, another small clinical study in healthy, resistance-trained males shows that rinsing the mouth with 25 mL of a solution containing caffeine 3%, but not 1% or 2%, reduces perceived exertion and increases muscular endurance, but not strength, when compared with placebo. The mouth rinse was used for 5 seconds immediately prior to a strength test or once per minute for 2 minutes during a muscular endurance test (108802). Preliminary clinical research has also investigated the use of caffeine in combination with other ingredients, such as sodium bicarbonate or creatine. However these studies have not demonstrated clear benefits in athletic performance over taking caffeine alone (112740,114673).
• Mental alertness. Oral caffeine increases mental alertness. However, it might not improve performance or accuracy to the same extent achieved through adequate sleep. Details: Consumption of caffeinated beverages or caffeine supplements seems to prevent a decline in alertness and cognitive capacity when consumed throughout the day (4221,4224,36439,37727,37757,37759,38070,38075,38158,91093)(91075). Caffeine appears to be especially effective in individuals that are not regular users (91074). Taking caffeine 100-600 mg can improve alertness and speed following prolonged sleep deprivation but usually does not affect mental performance or accuracy (10205,37716,37755,37806,37992,38007,38035,38139,91049,91072)(103706,112736). Drinking coffee containing caffeine 100 mg prior to a cognitive performance test improves reaction times in people with recent poor sleep quality, and in those with adequate sleep. However, the increase in vigilance occurring in the sleep-deprived people does not bring their performance up to the level seen with adequate sleep. Also, the number of errors made by sleep-deprived people seems to increase, suggesting that caffeine may have a detrimental effect on inhibitory control (98809). Caffeine also appears to reduce cognitive impairment caused by medications such as chlorpheniramine (91058). Combining caffeine with certain other supplements may improve mental performance. Taking caffeine 80 mg with taurine seems to provide a small improvement in mental performance (9899), although this effect is not observed in sleep deprived subjects (38154). Some clinical research shows that combining caffeine 40-75 mg with glucose 37.5 grams or L-theanine 97-100 mg improves mental performance better than placebo or either substance alone (13732,37762,37903,38116); however, other clinical research shows no additional benefit from combining L-theanine and caffeine (91045).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Intravenous caffeine may reduce the risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants. Details: Population research has found that initiating caffeine treatment prior to the third day of life in premature infants is associated with a reduced risk of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia compared to later initiation of treatment with caffeine. Additionally, a meta-analysis of available clinical research shows that high-dose caffeine (40-80 mg/kg loading dose, 20 mg/kg daily maintenance) lowers the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia when compared with standard dosing (20 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 5-10 mg/kg daily maintenance). However, small sample sizes and high heterogeneity limit the validity of these findings (97462,100364).
• Diabetes. Dietary caffeine seems to be beneficial for the prevention of type 2 diabetes; it is unclear if it is beneficial for the prevention of gestational diabetes. Also, it is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Details: Total caffeine consumption from beverages such as coffee or tea is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes. This effect appears to be dose-dependent (11353,14313,37850,37871,91040,100368). For example, an increase of 200 mg daily caffeine intake seems to be associated with a 14% decrease in the incidence of type 2 diabetes (91055). Additionally, in North American males, consuming caffeine 417 mg daily from coffee or tea is associated with a 20% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with those consuming less than 37 mg daily. North American females consuming at least 258 mg of caffeine daily from coffee or tea seem to have a 10% to 30% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with those consuming less than 140 mg daily (11353). Japanese adults who consume at least 416 mg of caffeine daily from beverages including coffee or green tea seem to have a 33% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared to those who consume no more than 57 mg daily. The risk reduction appears to be more pronounced in Japanese females when compared with males (14313). It is unclear if caffeine is beneficial in adults with diabetes. A few small studies show that caffeine consumption may further reduce insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes, gestational diabetes, or those at risk for developing diabetes (13744,37653,37820). Caffeine consumption has also been evaluated during pregnancy. An observational study has found that self-reported consumption of beverages containing up to 100 mg of caffeine at 16-22 weeks' gestation is associated with a 47% lower risk of developing gestational diabetes when compared with no intake (108814). Research regarding the effects of caffeine in patients with type 1 diabetes shows conflicting results. One study shows that taking caffeine 250 mg twice daily for 2 weeks can reduce the incidence of elevated blood sugar at night in patients with type 1 diabetes (37660). However, another study in patients with type 1 diabetes shows that taking caffeine 200 mg daily for 3 months may increase the ability to perceive hypoglycemic symptoms when compared with placebo, although overall glycemic control does not seem to be affected (6024). A small clinical crossover study evaluated caffeine for the prevention of exercise-induced hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes using ultra-long-acting insulin. This study shows that consuming a beverage containing caffeine 250 mg, glucose 10 grams, and aspartame 30 minutes before a moderate intensity cycling exercise does not reduce the risk of exercise-related hypoglycemia, alter the time to hypoglycemia, or increase peak plasma glucose levels during exercise when compared with taking glucose and aspartame (114662).
• Memory. Oral caffeine seems to be beneficial for short-term memory recall in college students and extroverted personalities. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for introverted personalities or other populations. Details: Taking a single dose of caffeine 65-200 mg orally daily seems to improve memory function in some individuals such as college students and people with extroverted personalities. A small study shows that taking caffeine does not improve memory function in individuals with introverted personalities (37845,38071,91080).
• Obesity. Oral caffeine, when taken in combination with ephedrine or as a component of green tea, seems to be beneficial for weight loss, short-term. Details: Taking caffeine orally, in combination with ephedrine or as a component of green tea, seems to help reduce weight, short-term (695,696,1704,8647,16892,37617,37831). Caffeine 192 mg in combination with ephedra 20-90 mg per day for 6 months seems to cause a modest weight reduction (5.3 kg) in people with a body mass index (BMI) between 25-40 kg/m². This combination, along with limiting fat intake to 30% of calories and moderate exercise, also seems to reduce body fat, decrease low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. However, even in carefully screened and monitored otherwise healthy adults, caffeine/ephedra combinations can cause small changes in blood pressure and heart rate (8647). Preliminary clinical research also shows that taking 1000 mg of a proprietary combination product containing caffeine and multiple other ingredients (Prograde Metabolism) twice daily for 8 weeks in conjunction with dieting reduces body weight, fat mass, waist circumference, and hip circumference by 1.5%, 5%, 1.8%, and 1.3%, respectively, when compared with dieting alone (40802).
• Pain (acute). Oral caffeine, when taken in combination with acetaminophen, propyphenazone, ibuprofen, or other pain-relieving agents, seems to be beneficial for acute pain. Details: Clinical research shows that taking caffeine 50-130 mg in combination with acetaminophen, propyphenazone, ibuprofen, or other pain-relieving agents can reduce acute pain when compared with the effects of pain-relieving agents alone (37587,37904,38036,38303,91038). Adding ≥100 mg caffeine to treatment with acetaminophen or ibuprofen results in 5% to 10% more patients that achieve at least 50% of maximum pain relief for over 4 hours when compared to treatment with acetaminophen or ibuprofen alone (91038).
• Postdural puncture headache. Oral or intravenous caffeine seem to be beneficial for preventing postdural puncture headache. Details: Using caffeine 300 mg orally or 500 mg in 1,000 mL normal saline intravenously seems to help treat and prevent postdural puncture headache (2727,2728). Using a combination of ergotamine and caffeine seems to be less effective than gabapentin for treating this condition (38147). Lower doses of oral caffeine may not be beneficial. Clinical research shows that oral caffeine, 75-125 mg, does not decrease the risk of postdural headache (91022).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Atrial fibrillation. Oral caffeine does not seem to prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiopulmonary bypass. In addition, it might increase the risk of gastrointestinal side effects. Details: In adults undergoing surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, taking caffeine 400 mg every 8 hours for 6 doses does not seem to reduce the risk of developing atrial fibrillation during the first three post-operative days. This clinical study was stopped prior to the completion of recruitment after an interim analysis showed increased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and no effect on the incidence of atrial fibrillation (97451).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Oral caffeine does not seem to reduce symptoms of ADHD in children. Details: Most research suggests caffeine does not significantly reduce ADHD symptoms in children when used at tolerable doses (10755,10756,10757,10758,10759,10760). The use of caffeine in adolescents and adults with ADHD has not been studied.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral caffeine prevents cognitive decline with aging. Details: Population research from a small cohort of elderly females shows that caffeine intake of more than 371 mg daily is associated with an attenuation in cognitive decline when compared to less than 30 mg daily. This is equivalent to the difference seen over a 7 year span of age. Caffeinated coffee consumption, but not caffeinated chocolate, tea, or cola, was associated with this attenuation in cognitive decline (91088).
• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for preventing dementia; the available research is conflicting. Details: Population research from the UK Biobank has found that caffeine intake up to 400 mg daily is associated with a 24% to 34% reduced risk of developing Alzheimer disease when compared with lower intake. Conversely, population research from the Rush Memory and Aging Project in the US has found that caffeine intake of more than 100 mg daily is associated with a 41% increased risk of developing Alzheimer disease when compared with lower intake. However, when those with mild cognitive impairment at baseline or cases diagnosed within 2 years of follow-up are excluded, these findings become insignificant (108810).
• Asthma. Oral caffeine seems to modestly improve airway function for up to 4 hours in patients with mild to moderate asthma. However, it is unclear if oral caffeine has a clinically significant effect on asthma symptoms or quality of life. Details: Taking caffeine 9 mg/kg orally appears to modestly improve airway function for up to 4 hours in people with mild to moderate asthma (37907,37915). However, more research is needed to determine the appropriate dose, whether any benefit is clinically significant, or whether tolerance occurs with chronic dosing.
• Cancer pain. It is unclear if intravenous caffeine is beneficial for cancer pain. Details: Clinical research shows that receiving caffeine 200 mg intravenously once daily for 2 days results in a significant reduction in pain intensity by 0.833 points on the NRS scale when compared with control in patients receiving opioids for pain from advanced cancer (91081).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral caffeine improves cognitive performance in trained athletes. Details: A meta-analysis of small studies in trained adult athletes shows that consumption of a low to moderate amount of caffeine 15-60 minutes prior to exercise and during exercise improves attention performance, but not reaction time or inhibitory control, when compared with placebo (108797). The validity of these findings is limited by unclear reporting.
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for preventing dementia or improving behavior in patients with dementia. Details: Population research from the Women's Health Initiative has found that caffeine intake of more than 175 mg daily is associated with a 26% reduced risk of developing probable dementia or global cognitive impairment when compared to less than 175 mg daily in postmenopausal adults 65-80 years of age (97458). Population research from the UK Biobank has found that caffeine intake up to 400 mg daily is associated with a 17% to 26% reduced risk for developing all-cause dementia when compared with lower intake. Conversely, population research from the Rush Memory and Aging Project in the US has found that caffeine intake of more than 100 mg daily is associated with a 35% increased risk of developing all-cause dementia when compared with lower intake. However, when those with mild cognitive impairment at baseline or cases diagnosed within 2 years of follow-up are excluded, these findings become insignificant (108810). Caffeine consumption has also been evaluated in patients with dementia. A cross-sectional study in patients with dementia in a care home has found that intake of 'normal' to 'high' amounts of caffeine are associated with reduced agitation and other behavioral symptoms when compared to 'low' intakes of caffeine (104574).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Some population research found that caffeine intake is associated with an increased incidence of depressive symptoms in pediatric patients (37839,38162). However, other population research found that caffeinated beverage intake is associated with a decreased incidence of depression in adults (37969,38165,91067,100366).
• Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) augmentation. Although there has been interest in using intravenous caffeine sodium benzoate to augment electroconvulsive therapy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of caffeine for this condition.
• Exercise-induced hypoxemia. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for hypoxemia associated with exercise. Details: Preliminary clinical research in athletes experiencing exercise-induced hypoxemia shows that taking caffeine 8 mg/kg can improve exercise ventilation, but not ventilatory response or oxygen saturation, when compared with placebo (37750).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for reducing muscle soreness during exercise. Details: There is conflicting clinical evidence as to whether caffeine can reduce exercise-induced muscle pain. Some evidence shows that taking caffeine 100 mg or 10 mg/kg can reduce muscle pain during exercise when compared with placebo (37622,38146). However, the effect of lower doses is unclear. Some evidence shows that taking caffeine 5 mg/kg may reduce exercise-induced muscle pain when compared with placebo (37747,91050), while other evidence suggests that taking caffeine 2-5 mg/kg does not affect muscle pain during exercise (38141).
• Gallbladder disease. It is unclear if increased dietary caffeine intake reduces the risk of developing gallstones. Details: Consumption of caffeinated beverages that provide 400 mg or greater of caffeine per day is associated with a significantly reduced risk of developing symptomatic gallstone disease (3345,8032). The effect seems to be dose-dependent; consumption of 800 mg caffeine per day has the greatest reduction in risk (3345).
• Hepatitis C. It is unclear if increased dietary caffeine reduces the risk for hepatitis C-associated severe liver inflammation, although it may reduce the risk of developing advanced fibrosis. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that regular consumption of caffeine at doses of at least 123 mg daily is associated with a 48% reduced risk of advanced liver fibrosis when compared to lower caffeine intake in patients with hepatitis C virus (95947). An individual population study also found that higher intake of caffeine from coffee is associated with reduced severity of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus. For these patients, the risk of advanced fibrosis is reduced by 14% for each 67 mg of caffeine (37896). However, caffeine intake does not appear to be associated with a reduced risk of moderate to severe liver inflammation in patients with hepatitis C (95947).
• Hypnic headache. It is unclear if oral caffeine reduces the pain associated with this rare condition. Details: Anecdotal evidence suggests that drinking a cup of coffee containing caffeine before bed or upon waking up may help alleviate pain associated with hypnic headaches (38078).
• Hypotension. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial in people with low blood pressure. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming caffeinated beverages increase blood pressure in elderly people with postprandial hypotension (11834,11835).
• Intermittent claudication. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for intermittent claudication. Details: Taking a single dose of caffeine 6 mg/kg orally seems to improve walking distance, muscular strength, and endurance in patients with intermittent claudication; however, balance seems to be reduced (38038).
• Liver disease. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for liver disease prevention. Details: Population research found that there is an inverse association between intake of coffee and the incidence of liver cirrhosis (37576,37608). However, it is unclear if this effect of coffee is attributable to caffeine, since other caffeinated beverages do not show this effect.
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for the symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Details: A small crossover study in adults with MS shows that taking caffeine 200 mg daily for 12 weeks may modestly improve balance, functional mobility, and MS-related quality of life, but not walking function, when compared to a 2-week placebo run-in period. All patients were told to eliminate all other forms of caffeine from their diets; however, baseline caffeine intake was not recorded (114663). The validity of this study is limited by the small size and heterogeneous nature of the study population, which included patients with various forms of MS at varying levels of severity.
• Narcolepsy. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for narcolepsy. Details: A small clinical study in patients with narcolepsy shows that taking caffeine 200 mg daily in the morning for 1 week does not affect reaction time, but modestly reduces drowsiness, when compared with baseline (103698). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a statistical comparison between the treatment and placebo groups.
• Neonatal resuscitation. It is unclear if oral caffeine improves the likelihood for successful extubation in preterm infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in extremely preterm infants requiring mechanical ventilation within the first 5 days of birth shows that early administration of caffeine, given as a loading dose of caffeine citrate 20 mg/kg followed by a maintenance dose of 5 mg/kg daily until extubation, does not reduce mortality or shorten time to first successful extubation when compared to giving a bolus dose of caffeine citrate 20 mg/kg just prior to extubation (97461).
• Nocturnal enuresis. Reducing caffeine intake might reduce the frequency of nocturnal enuresis episodes in children. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children aged 6-15 years with primary nocturnal enuresis shows that limiting caffeine intake to less than 30 mg daily reduces the mean number of bedwetting episodes from 3.5 to 2.4 per week, when compared with no change in the group with intakes of 80-100 mg daily. The probability of bedwetting in the caffeine restricted group was about 14% lower than that in the control group (111495).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for nonmelanoma skin cancer prevention. Details: A review of available population research shows that increased caffeine intake from any source is associated with a 14% reduction in the risk of developing nonmelanoma skin cancer. Consumption of caffeinated coffee, but not decaffeinated coffee, is associated with an 18% reduced risk (97465).
• Parkinson disease. Although consuming caffeinated beverages might reduce the risk of developing Parkinson disease, it is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for improving symptoms. Also, oral caffeine does not seem to prevent tardive dyskinesia. Details: It is unclear whether caffeine improves some symptoms of Parkinson disease, as results from clinical research are conflicting (91069,95951,95954,103705). One clinical study in Parkinson disease patients with extreme daytime somnolence shows that taking caffeine 100 mg twice daily for 3 weeks and then 200 mg twice daily for 3 weeks results in modest improvements in rigidity and bradykinesia, but inconsistent improvements in drowsiness, when compared with placebo (91069). Other clinical research shows that caffeine 200 mg twice daily does not lead to improvements in motor severity, cognition, or somnolence after 6, 12, or 18 months when compared with placebo (95954). Furthermore, a large retrospective study has found that caffeine consumption of more than 300 mg daily for 18 months in conjunction with dopaminergic therapy does not slow the rate of Parkinson disease progression. This research also shows that a reported consumption of caffeine greater than 300 mg, in conjunction with creatine 10 grams daily for 18 months, may accelerate the rate of Parkinson disease progression (95951). The retrospective nature of this study limits the validity of these findings. Caffeine does not appear to be helpful for reducing the risk of tardive dyskinesia. A retrospective analysis has found no definitive difference in onset of tardive dyskinesia in Parkinson patients consuming more than 204 mg caffeine daily when compared with those consuming less than 68 mg daily (91090). Despite these mainly negative findings, large-scale epidemiological studies have found that people who consume caffeinated beverages, such as coffee, tea, and cola, have a decreased risk of Parkinson disease (37931,91060,91071,103705). Males consuming 3-4 cups (28 oz) of caffeinated coffee per day, or 421-2716 mg total caffeine, seem to have the lowest risk of developing this condition. However, a lower risk is also associated with consumption of as little as 124-208 mg of caffeine (6022). In females, more moderate caffeinated coffee consumption, such as 1-3 cups per day, seems to be best (1238). Caffeine does not appear to provide additional protection from Parkinson disease in cigarette smokers (9236,91060).
• Postoperative ileus. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for improving bowel recovery following colorectal surgery. Research is conflicting and may vary depending on the type of procedure performed. Details: A meta-analysis of two small clinical trials in adults undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection shows that taking caffeine 100-200 mg three times daily, starting on postoperative day 1, does not reduce the time to the first stool, time to first flatus, or length of hospital stay (LOS) when compared with placebo (112732). Another meta-analysis of 8 trials, including the 2 trials discussed previously, pooled 610 patients undergoing open and laparoscopic colorectal procedures. The analysis shows that caffeine taken three times daily, starting either on the day of surgery or on postoperative day 1, reduces LOS and the time to first bowel movement when compared with placebo, tea, or decaffeinated coffee. However, a sub-analysis of only laparoscopic procedures shows no difference in LOS between groups. These findings are limited by high heterogeneity, which appears to be due primarily to differences between open and laparoscopic procedures (114660).
• Postoperative pain. It is unclear if intravenous caffeine is beneficial for reducing opioid consumption in adults undergoing surgery. Details: A small clinical study in adults undergoing laparoscopic colorectal and gastrointestinal surgery shows that intravenous caffeine citrate 200 mg at the initiation of surgical closure has no effect on cumulative opioid consumption through postoperative day 3 when compared with placebo. In fact, post-hoc analysis with adjustment for age, sex, comorbidities, history of anxiety or depression, and open surgical conversion suggests an increase in opioid consumption with administration of caffeine when compared with placebo (108809).
• Pre-eclampsia. It is unclear if oral caffeine intake affects the risk of gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia. Details: a meta-analysis of 10 observational studies including about 115,000 pregnant people did not find an association between the level of caffeine intake during pregnancy and the risk of developing gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia (111485).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Population research has found that increased intake of either caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee is associated with a decreased risk of stroke in females (37804). However, it is not clear if the effect of coffee is attributable to the caffeine component.
• Tinnitus. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial in patients with chronic tinnitus. Details: A small clinical study in adults with chronic tinnitus shows that taking a single dose of caffeine 300 mg improves mood and quality of life at 1 hour when compared with baseline. (108805). The lack of statistical comparison to the placebo group limits the validity of these findings. More evidence is needed to rate the effectiveness of caffeine for these uses.

(Read more about CAFFEINE)

EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Oral calcium carbonate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an antacid. Details: Taking calcium carbonate orally as an antacid is effective for treating dyspepsia (1843). Calcium carbonate has FDA approval as an antacid.
• Hyperkalemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities. Details: Administering calcium gluconate intravenously can reverse electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias induced by hyperkalemia (12946). Intravenous calcium gluconate is FDA-approved for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities.
• Hypocalcemia. Oral calcium treats and prevents hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium is used to treat severe hypocalcemia. Details: Taking calcium orally is effective for treating and preventing hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate, acetate, gluceptate, or chloride is effective for severe hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany (12928).
• Kidney failure. Oral calcium carbonate or calcium acetate is used as a phosphate binder during kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium carbonate or calcium acetate orally is effective as a phosphate binder. Calcium acetate (PhosLo) appears to control hyperphosphatemia better than sevelamer (Renagel) (12943,12944,38990). Calcium citrate is not recommended for this purpose because it increases aluminum absorption and does not bind phosphate as efficiently as calcium acetate or calcium carbonate (21631). Some clinical research also shows that taking calcium orally reduces blood pressure in patients with kidney failure (975).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral calcium in combination with vitamin D prevents bone density loss that occurs during long-term treatment with corticosteroids. Details: Taking calcium in combination with vitamin D as adjunctive therapy seems to be effective for reducing bone mineral density loss in people using corticosteroids long-term (982,1046,1830,1831,1832,4462,4463,4464,4465,4466)(4467,12945,38493). One specific product used in clinical research is Oscal (Marion Merrel Dow Inc.), which contains elemental calcium 500 mg per tablet plus vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (982). Another product used is Oscal 250 + D (SmithKline Beecham Healthcare), which contains elemental calcium 250 mg and vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (1046).
• Hyperparathyroidism. Oral calcium reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium orally reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with kidney failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism (1827,1828,1829,39174,39425). In elderly women, the combination of calcium and vitamin D reverses secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces hip fracture risk (8818). Also, population research suggests increased calcium intake from the diet and supplements reduces the risk of primary hyperparathyroidism in women. Supplemental intakes of at least 500 mg/day and dietary intakes of approximately 1100 mg/day are considered to be protective (91353).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate calcium intake, from the diet and/or supplements, is recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate calcium intake in line with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) by age, along with adequate vitamin D intake, for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake when adequate dietary intake is not feasible (109425). In the US and Canada, foods containing at least 200 mg calcium with less phosphorous content than calcium can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate calcium intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (11940,102148). However, calcium supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Also, calcium supplements do not seem to be effective for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) during lactation (988), in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation (1817), or in patients who have had renal transplantation (4823,38736,38871). Maximal bone growth occurs in the teenage years, and then BMD in females remains relatively constant until age 30-40. After age 40, bone loss typically occurs at rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. In males, this occurs several decades later. Bone loss is more pronounced if dietary calcium intake is below the RDA, which is the case for many Americans (2571,2578). One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy children 7-14 years old shows that fortifying food with calcium 250-1000 mg daily for up to 24 months modestly improves femoral neck BMD, but not hip or spine BMD. However, the included trials did not supplement vitamin D (107232). During the 5 years immediately after menopause, calcium supplementation has very little effect on bone loss (2569,2570,2575,2576). The rapid loss of estrogen causes a high bone resorption rate, which increases serum calcium levels and therefore decreases intestinal absorption of calcium (2570). After this period, the typical rate of bone loss is 2% per year (2572,2576). Taking calcium 1000-1600 mg daily as carbonate, citrate, lactate gluconate, or citrate malate salt decreases this rate by 0.25% to 1% annually (977,979,981,2569,2571,2572,2575,2576,2578,6850)(38978,38980,39064). The greatest reductions (1% or more) are seen in the first 1-2 years of supplementation when bone remodeling foci can be filled (2569,2576). After this period, the differences in rate of loss between supplemented and non-supplemented females are closer to 0.25% per year (2569,2577). A meta-analysis of clinical evidence suggests that there is no additional benefit after 4 years (38980). Small clinical studies have found that continuous calcium supplementation at an average daily dose of 1050 mg, started after menopause and continued for 1.5-4 years, may reduce fracture rates by 26% when compared with no calcium supplementation. The largest of these studies was conducted in nursing home residents who also received daily vitamin D; the benefits of calcium, specifically, are unclear (39386). Some research also suggests that calcium and vitamin D improves primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in some older individuals with osteoporosis, particularly the elderly and those who are no longer community dwelling (12930,38875,38849,39026,109471). However, not all research is positive. One large clinical trial in elderly adults with a low-trauma fracture show that taking calcium 1000 mg daily with or without vitamin D 800 IU daily for 2-7 years does not reduce the risk of a second fracture when compared with placebo (13073). Another clinical study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 800 IU daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (less than 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). Also, some exploratory research suggests that supplements may need to be continued indefinitely; in adults over 68 years of age, any effects of 2 years of calcium supplements on BMD appear to be lost within 2 years after discontinuing supplements (6853). Calcium has additive effects when used with other agents such as vitamin D, estrogens, or calcitonin. Whereas calcium alone generally reduces or prevents loss of BMD, combination with other agents can produce small increases in BMD ranging from 0.3% to 3.3% depending on the combination and dosages used (978,980,1836,2570,2571,2572,2576). However, one meta-analysis in healthy adults shows that fortifying foods with calcium 250-1000 mg daily, in conjunction with vitamin D supplementation, for up to 24 months does not improve BMD when compared with control (107232). The full potential of osteoporosis treatments cannot be realized without adequate calcium intake (2569,2570,2571,2572). Advise patients taking agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene (Evista) to ensure that their daily calcium intake meets the RDA. Use supplements if necessary. The usefulness of calcium in preventing osteoporosis in males is not as well-studied. Some observational research has found that calcium 870 mg daily is not associated with changes in BMD and bone loss in males (97201). However, clinical evidence suggests that taking calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years might improve trabecular or cortical bone mass by 2% to 4% (980,8827,8873). Dietary supplementation with calcium and vitamin D seems to moderately reduce bone loss measured in the femoral neck, spine, and total body, and seems to reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in older patients with osteopenia or low BMD (980).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Adequate calcium intake seems to prevent symptoms of PMS. Details: There seems to be a link between low dietary calcium intake and symptoms of PMS (2004,6847,39007). Taking calcium 1000-1336 mg daily seems to significantly reduce depressed mood, water retention, and pain, especially if daily calcium intake is inadequate (1822,1823,1824,2004,95821). Calcium carbonate 1200 mg daily seems to decrease PMS symptom scores by about 18% when compared with placebo (1822). Increasing dietary calcium intake is also associated with a decreased risk of developing PMS. Consuming an average of 1283 mg of calcium per day from foods is associated with about a 30% lower risk of developing PMS compared with consuming an average of 529 mg daily (13094); however, taking calcium supplements does not appear to be associated with the risk of developing PMS.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Oral calcium seems to be beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer, especially in those with adequate vitamin D levels and normal body mass index (BMI). Details: Population studies have found that increased intake of dietary or supplemental calcium is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas (1047,8820,12120,38951,98898,98899). Clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research also show that taking calcium supplements 1.2-2 grams daily for up to 4 years can reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence by up to 29% (970,12118,12950,15267,34596,38718,39042,95817). However, not all research has been positive. Some meta-analyses of clinical research or observational studies suggest that taking calcium does not reduce the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer (34596,39042,39349). Other contradictory research suggests that postmenopausal females who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290); however, this finding may not be reliable due to the high baseline intake of calcium in study participants. The reason for these conflicting findings is not entirely clear. Vitamin D might be an important factor. People with lower than average vitamin D levels do not seem to get any benefit from calcium supplements (12118). Also, one meta-analysis of previous trials suggests that taking calcium 1200 mg daily reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas in people with a normal BMI, but not in those who are overweight or obese (99715). Despite this conflicting evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2005 stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence to support this claim (102366).
• Fetal bone mineralization. If calcium intakes are low during pregnancy, oral calcium seems to be beneficial for increasing fetal bone density. Details: With low dietary calcium intake (less than 562 mg elemental calcium daily) during pregnancy, calcium supplementation increases fetal bone mineralization and density. However, calcium supplementation does not offer any additional benefit if calcium intakes are adequate (3263,3264).
• Hypertension. Oral calcium seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount in adults with or without hypertension. However, it is unclear if this reduction is clinically significant. Details: Many clinical trials and observational studies, including a meta-analysis of 18 high-quality clinical trials, show that intake of calcium supplements or dietary calcium modestly reduces systolic blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension, usually around 1-2 mmHg. Calcium seems to be more effective for certain subpopulations of patients, such as those who are salt-sensitive or have low baseline dietary calcium intake (945,972,974,976,984,1818,1819,1820,1821,6852)(13138,14406,38803,39063,39094,39221,113920,113925). However, a large-scale clinical trial in postmenopausal females shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg daily does not lower blood pressure or reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials shows that taking calcium in combination with vitamin D for up to 7 years has no effect on blood pressure (98861). The validity of this finding is limited by the poor methodological quality of the included studies. Some observational research suggests that calcium can reduce the risk for hypertension. Population research in females aged 45 years and older suggests that higher intake of calcium from both diet and supplemental sources is linked to a lower risk of developing hypertension when compared to lower calcium intake (14265). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension. However, the FDA has concluded that this claim is based on supporting, rather than conclusive, evidence (102367). Research evaluating the effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on the child's blood pressure has yielded conflicting findings. A systematic review of 2 clinical studies and 3 observational studies found that calcium intake during pregnancy is associated with a 1-2 mmHg reduction in the systolic blood pressure of the offspring between the ages of 1-7 years (38852). However, a separate meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies shows that calcium intake during pregnancy does not reduce systolic or diastolic blood pressure in the offspring (113923).
• Osteomalacia. Oral calcium seems to reverse osteomalacia caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Osteomalacia is commonly caused by vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to osteomalacia in children and adults. Calcium supplementation can reverse osteomalacia caused by calcium deficiency. Along with appropriate vitamin D supplementation, individuals at risk of osteomalacia need sufficient calcium intake (94819).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral calcium seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia, especially in high-risk individuals and those with low baseline dietary calcium intake. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (971,38756), most clinical research shows that taking calcium orally 1-2 grams daily reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia (973,1833,8828,39043,39319,39426,97348,113919). A large clinical trial of 11,000 pregnant individuals in India and Tanzania shows that supplementation with 500 mg daily is similarly effective to 1500 mg daily (113908). Multiple meta-analyses which include 16-30 clinical studies have found that varying doses of calcium supplementation reduce the relative risk of pre-eclampsia by 46% to 51% when compared with placebo (97348,113909,113919). One of these meta-analyses found that for every 19 females treated with calcium, one episode of pre-eclampsia would be avoided (97348). Additionally, one of these meta-analyses found that calcium reduces the relative risk of pre-eclampsia by 51%, regardless of whether it is taken at a dose above or below 1000 mg daily (113919). Some research suggests that calcium supplementation may have a greater effect in individuals at high risk of pre-eclampsia or with low baseline dietary calcium intake, and when taken at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation (15029,38497,97348,99714,113919). However, another meta-analysis of 30 clinical studies found a similar benefit of calcium in both high- and low-risk individuals (113919). A separate meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies conducted in China evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy. This combination was associated with an 80% lower relative risk of pre-eclampsia and an 83% lower relative risk of pre-eclampsia with gestational hypertension when compared with routine care (113913). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding the use of calcium supplements to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. However, due to the limited and conflicting research available at that time, the FDA stated that this outcome was highly unlikely (102366). Since then, large, high-quality clinical research has supported this finding. In fact, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released a recommendation to prescribe oral calcium 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancies at high risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary calcium intakes are low (97347).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. Oral calcium may reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Details: A meta-analysis of 17 clinical studies shows that calcium supplementation during pregnancy may reduce the relative risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension by 30% when compared with control (113909). A separate meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies conducted in China, which evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy, shows that this combination reduces the relative risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension by 85% when compared with routine care (113913).
• Rickets. Oral calcium seems to reverse rickets caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Rickets is commonly caused be vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to rickets. Calcium supplementation can reverse rickets caused by calcium deficiency (94819). A small clinical study in children with nutritional rickets shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily for 24 weeks improves radiographically measured rickets caused by calcium deficiency. Rickets seems to improve more rapidly with calcium 1000 mg compared to calcium 500 mg. However, increasing the calcium dose to 2000 mg daily is not more beneficial than calcium 1000 mg daily (98904).
• Tooth retention. Oral calcium with vitamin D seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral calcium, via supplementation or as part of the diet, does not seem to be beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Although some studies disagree (15631,39041,95811,107237,113917), most population research suggests that increased calcium intake is not associated with overall breast cancer risk (15631,16715,98895,107236,107237,113917). However, one meta-analysis of observational studies shows that although higher total calcium intake is not associated with breast cancer risk, higher dietary calcium intake, specifically, may be associated with a slightly reduced risk (113917). Also, some analyses suggest that calcium intake may be associated with the risk for certain breast cancer sub-types. Some subgroup analyses suggest that calcium intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, adults (15631,107237) and that dietary calcium intake may reduce estrogen receptor(ER)-negative breast cancer, but not ER-positive breast cancer (107236). However, most research has not evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation or intake on breast cancer subtypes. The best evidence to date, from a large scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years after menopause does not reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer at the end of the study and 5 years after the end of the intervention (16715,98895).
• Fractures. Although oral calcium prevents fractures in osteoporosis, most evidence shows that calcium does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis discussion for more information on the use of calcium for this purpose. Details: Robust meta-analyses of mostly large, high-quality clinical studies show that calcium supplementation 500-1600 mg daily for 0.5-7 years with or without vitamin D does not reduce total fractures, hip fractures, vertebral fractures, or non-vertebral fractures in older adults without osteoporosis (95822,112486). A large-scale study in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years who were enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) suggests that calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D 400 IU daily for 7 years only modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) and does not significantly reduce fracture risk. This lack of effect may have been due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. In those who were 80% adherent, the combination of calcium plus vitamin D reduced the risk of hip fracture by about 29% (14282). Also, some clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 5 years does not attenuate loss of height after menopause when compared with placebo (95810). Additional meta-analyses of clinical and observational evidence suggest that calcium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, such as hip fractures (38589,38888,98895). Some other research has suggested that calcium in combination with vitamin D reduces fracture risk in older patients without osteoporosis (980,1836,8818,12930,12933,12952,38849,102145,107235); however, this research is confounded by a number of variables, including the presence of hormonal therapy and differing levels of fracture risk at baseline (1836,8818,95822). Conflicting findings on this topic might also be due to genetic differences in patient populations. A population analysis of the WHI study found that, in older females with the lowest genetic susceptibility to low BMD, taking calcium with vitamin D is associated with a reduction in fracture risk. However, in females with a higher genetic susceptibility to low BMD, there is no association between supplementation and fracture risk. This might be because individuals with a lower susceptibility to low BMD are also more responsive to calcium and vitamin D supplementation (97357). As of April 2018, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with vitamin D >400 IU daily along with calcium >1000 mg daily is safe and effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture. USPSTF recommends against supplementing with calcium 1000 mg daily or less along with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal females (95695).
• Obesity. Oral calcium does not seem to improve weight loss in adults or children with overweight or obesity. Details: Observational research has found that adults and children with low calcium intake are more likely to gain weight, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and be overweight or obese when compared to people with high calcium intake (12124,12125,12126,12127,14265). Additional observational research has found that increasing calcium intake is associated with weight loss in females; the results in males have been conflicting (12127,15602,15603). Despite these findings from observational research and a few small clinical studies (12128,15397,14438,98905,113918), most clinical research has found that increased calcium intake does not increase weight loss (12052,13138,15396,15399,38985,39004,97356). A meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies shows that daily dietary and supplemental calcium intake that meets the dietary reference intake (DRI) of 1000 mg or more daily does not increase weight loss in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when compared with intake below the DRI (95813). An older meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials also shows that increased dietary and supplemental calcium intake does not increase weight loss (15605).
• Overall mortality. Oral calcium does not seem to reduce overall mortality. Details: While some population research has found that calcium taken in combination with vitamin D in older females is associated with a lower risk of death (97353), most evidence shows that calcium, with or without vitamin D, has no effect on all-cause mortality (93533,97308,113584).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral calcium does not reduce the risk of developing CVD and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Clinical research shows that calcium does not decrease CVD risk. Several separate meta-analyses of clinical and population research involving over 50,000 patients show that taking calcium 600-1200 mg daily for up to 7 years does not reduce the risk of CVD-related outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or overall mortality (39018,91350,92994,93533,97308,98902,107231,107233). No association was found between total dietary or supplemental calcium intake with or without vitamin D and the risk of CVD or mortality (91350,93533,97308). In fact, some population and clinical research has found that when calcium is used alone or with vitamin D, there is an INCREASED risk of CVD and coronary heart disease (38077,107233). However, other clinical research disagrees (93533). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease by 1.1-1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Intravenous calcium does not prevent nerve pain in patients given oxaliplatin. Oral calcium has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: While pooled analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials suggest that calcium and magnesium infusion decreases the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials shows that the infusion has no effect in preventing neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). Additionally, clinical trials show that administering calcium gluconate 1 gram with magnesium sulfate 1 gram intravenously immediately before, or before and after, the administration of a single oxaliplatin cycle (90005), or over the entire 6-cycle course of oxaliplatin, does not improve symptoms of neurotoxicity when compared with placebo (96474).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral calcium does not prevent MI. When taken in the absence of vitamin D, oral calcium may increase the risk of MI. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of calcium is associated with a decreased risk of MI (91350). However, a 2010 meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking calcium at a dose of at least 500 mg daily is associated with an approximate 30% INCREASE in the risk of MI in patients over the age of 40. According to this analysis, one additional case of MI will occur for every 69 patients that take calcium for 5 years (17482). A more recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of MI by 1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research studied postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233) In contrast, other meta-analyses of clinical research have shown that taking calcium for up to 7 years is NOT associated with an increased risk of MI, including a meta-analysis that only included postmenopausal females (93533,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI in postmenopausal females (93533). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for alcohol use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 800 mg and vitamin D 200 IU orally daily for 14 days modestly reduces alcohol craving scores and withdrawal scores when compared with placebo in adults with alcohol dependence that are undergoing withdrawal. Taking calcium carbonate did not reduce the need for diazepam; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (107234).
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for atherosclerosis. Details: A population study has found that taking calcium 1.2 grams daily for 3 years has no effect on carotid intima thickness or carotid atherosclerosis incidence. A total calcium intake (dietary and supplemental) of at least 1794 mg daily in older females may be associated with a decreased risk of carotid atherosclerosis when compared with a total calcium intake below 1010 mg daily (97351).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the odds of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. Details: A small observational study found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a 52% reduced odds of an autism spectrum disorder in the offspring (98900).
• Brain tumor. It is unclear if dietary calcium intake is associated with risk of brain tumor. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 case-control studies has found that higher dietary calcium intake is associated with a lower odds of brain tumor when compared with lower dietary intake (113922). The validity of this finding is limited by the exploratory nature of the included studies, which analyzed all dietary ingredients for any potential associations.
• Cancer. Oral calcium alone does not seem to prevent cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Taking calcium alone does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of cancer (12118,15629). The role of calcium in cancer prevention when taken along with vitamin D is controversial, as conflicting results exist. One clinical trial shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1400-1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1100 IU daily have a 60% lower relative risk for developing cancer of any type. Approximately 25 postmenopausal females would need to take this combination for 4 years to prevent one occurrence of cancer (15629). However, a more recent clinical study shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of cancer at 4 years (93943). Reasons for the disparate results are not entirely clear. The discrepancies do not appear to be related to baseline vitamin D levels or different study populations. It is possible that, given the 10-year time lapse between the two publications, the discrepancies result from differences in cancer detection capability. Also, since cancer risk was a secondary outcome measure in the earlier study and a primary outcome measure in the more recent study, it is possible that the discrepancies result from differences in statistical methodologies. The effect of vitamin D and calcium on cancer risk in males and younger patients is not known. There is also interest in using calcium for reducing the risk of hematological malignancies. An analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU for up to 10 years is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of hematologic malignancies when compared with placebo. However, no effect on hematologic malignancy related mortality was seen (97354).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between a higher dietary intake of calcium and the risk of depression when compared with a lower dietary intake of calcium (96480).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if dietary calcium intake is associated with type 2 diabetes risk. Details: Some population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from the diet or supplements, alone or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713,96473,113929). One meta-analysis of cohort and cross-sectional studies found that the highest level of dietary calcium intake is associated with an 18% relative reduction in risk of type 2 diabetes when compared with the lowest level of intake. A dose-response analysis suggests that each 300, 600, and 1000 mg per day increase in dietary calcium intake is associated with a 7%, 14%, and 23% reduced risk of type 2 diabetes, respectively (113929). However, population research is often limited by confounding variables. For example, one analysis suggests that any beneficial effect might be influenced by concomitant magnesium intake (96473,113929), while another suggests that any benefit from increased intake may be more pronounced in females, adults aged 50 years or older, and Asian populations (113929). Furthermore, other population research has found that serum calcium levels higher than 9.6 mg/dL are associated with greater risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults with osteoporosis (95815).
• Dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for dyslipidemia. Details: One clinical study in adults with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia shows that adding calcium carbonate 400 mg three times daily to a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) for 6 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4% and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 4% when compared with the low-fat diet and placebo (2557). In contrast, a clinical study in females with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 800 mg daily for 2 years INCREASES total cholesterol levels and carotid intima-media thickness in postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, females when compared with placebo (97350). Calcium supplementation has also been evaluated in combination with vitamin D. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including adults with normolipidemia and dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily and vitamin D 200-7142 IU daily modestly improves HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplementation is most beneficial in patients with dyslipidemia at baseline (107227). The relationship between dietary calcium intake and serum lipid levels has also been evaluated in observational research. A meta-analysis of 7-11 observational studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with total cholesterol levels, although small differences in individual lipid parameters were identified. Additionally, a meta-analysis of 4-9 observational studies suggests that calcium intake is not associated with the risk of developing hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, or low HDL. A subgroup analysis found that higher calcium intake may be associated with lower triglyceride levels in Asian populations (113927). Overall, these findings are limited by significant heterogeneity and the cross-sectional nature of the included studies.
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing pain associated with dysmenorrhea. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg with vitamin D 5000 IU daily for three menstrual cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (95821). However, calcium carbonate 1000 mg taken alone seems to reduce pain when compared with placebo.
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but dietary calcium does not seem to have any effect (38893).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A very small clinical study in resistance-trained adults shows that taking calcium carbonate 500 mg 4 times daily for 3 weeks does not attenuate exercise-induced muscle damage from bench presses when compared with placebo (113933). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing falls. Details: Research suggests that calcium in combination with vitamin D, but not calcium alone, might prevent falls by decreasing body sway and normalizing systolic blood pressure (6362,11939,39038). Some experts think the combination of calcium and vitamin D may be important (11916). Preliminary clinical research in adults residing in a health care facility shows that taking vitamin D supplements while increasing dietary calcium and protein for 2 years reduces falls by 11% when compared with standard diets. Intervention diets were supplemented with milk, yogurt, and cheese to provide calcium 1142 mg and protein 69 grams daily (107235). There might also be different effects in females compared to males. In one study, females aged 65 years or older who took vitamin D 700 IU plus calcium citrate 500 mg daily over a 3-year period had a 46% lower risk of falling. However, this combination did not decrease falls in males (14291).
• Fluorosis. Oral calcium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking calcium orally, in combination with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and vitamin D, seems to be effective for reducing excessive fluoride levels in children and improving symptoms of fluorosis in children aged 6-12 years (990).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral calcium in combination with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing heart failure. Details: Based on a secondary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), taking calcium 1000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily does not reduce the risk of heart failure in the overall population or in individuals at high risk. However, in a subgroup of postmenopausal females without risk factors for heart failure, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of developing heart failure by about 37% (97307).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing blood levels of lead. Details: Lead is mobilized along with calcium from bone during pregnancy and lactation, resulting in increased serum concentrations of lead. One clinical study suggests that calcium supplementation does not significantly decrease these elevated lead concentrations (1586). However, another clinical study suggests that taking calcium reduces blood lead levels by 11% when compared with placebo, with greatest effects observed in those with high baseline levels of lead (38957).
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral calcium for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of calcium for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium alone or with vitamin D is beneficial for metabolic syndrome prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet and supplements alone, or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713).
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing nephrotic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium 500-1000 mg daily for 3 months in combination with vitamin D3 60,000 IU daily or weekly for 4 weeks has no effect on bone mineral density or the risk of relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (97355).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking calcium alone or with vitamin D3 1000 IU daily reduced the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but had no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma (104622).
• Oral mucositis. When used in combination with fluoride treatments, a calcium phosphate mouth rinse seems to prevent and reduce mucositis-related pain in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that using a particular mouth rinse (Caphosol, EUSA Pharma) containing calcium phosphate, in combination with fluoride treatments, reduces days of mucositis, the duration of pain, and the dose and days of morphine used when compared with placebo and fluoride treatment (38611).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: An older meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (38792). However, a more recent pooled analysis of 15 cohort and case-control studies has found that the highest intake of dietary or dairy calcium is associated with a 20% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared to the lowest intake (97349).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing postpartum depression risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium 2 grams daily beginning at 11-21 weeks gestation reduces depression at 12 weeks postpartum when compared with placebo. However, no benefit is seen at 6 weeks postpartum (39447).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing leg cramps during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking calcium 1 gram twice daily (as a mixture of salts) for 2 weeks can reduce pregnancy-related leg cramps during the second half of pregnancy when compared with no treatment (2567).
• Prematurity. It is unclear if supplemental calcium is beneficial for the growth and development of preterm infants. Details: A small clinical study in preterm infants consuming human milk shows that supplementation with calcium 45 mg/kg daily and phosphorus 25 mg/kg daily does not affect infant weight, length, head circumference, or risk of osteopenia after 6 weeks when compared with human milk alone (113924). However, the duration and size of this study may have been too limited to detect any difference between groups.
• Preterm labor. It is unclear if oral calcium reduces the risk of preterm labor. Details: A meta-analysis of 10 clinical studies shows that taking calcium supplements during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of preterm labor when compared with placebo (113909). A separate meta-analysis of 7 clinical studies conducted in China, which evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy, shows that this combination reduces the relative risk of preterm labor by 74% when compared with routine care (113913).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily might decrease the risk of developing prostate cancer (14133). However, some epidemiological research suggests that consuming very high doses of calcium, over 2000 mg daily, might actually increase the risk of developing prostate cancer (14134). Some epidemiological research also suggests that doses greater than 1500 mg daily increase the risk of poorly differentiated, clinically advanced, and fatal prostate cancer (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer (98894). However, contradictory research suggests that there is no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall risk of prostate cancer (14131,14132,104630).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Some population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke (4822,38678). However, other population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is not associated with a decreased risk of stroke (91350). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years does not affect the risk of stroke when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females, and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Vertigo. Oral calcium with vitamin D might reduce positional vertigo; the effect of calcium when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking calcium 500 mg and vitamin D 400 IU twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate calcium for these uses.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Diabetic neuropathy. Applying a specific prescription patch containing capsaicin 8% or a specific cream containing capsaicin 0.075% can reduce pain in diabetic neuropathy. Details: Clinical research has evaluated the use of a specific patch (Qutenza, NeurogesX Inc.) containing capsaicin 8%, which is approved as a prescription medication by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The research in this population shows that a single application of the patch on the painful parts of the feet for 30-90 minutes following pretreatment with topical anesthetics reduces pain for up to 12 weeks when compared with placebo (40719,96453). Patients using the patch experience reduced sleep interference and an average 28% reduction in pain, compared with a 21% reduction with placebo. Additionally, 50% of patients receiving the patch experience pain relief within 19 days, compared to 72 days for those receiving placebo (96453). A meta-analysis of the available clinical research for diabetic peripheral neuropathy found that one-time application of this patch is equally effective to duloxetine 20-120 mg daily, pregabalin 75-600 mg daily, and gabapentin 300-3600 mg daily in producing a 30% or 50% pain reduction. The dose of oral medication used in the evaluated studies did not impact the comparative efficacy of the capsaicin patch (96450). Other clinical research shows that applying cream containing capsaicin 0.075% four times daily for 8 weeks reduces pain intensity when compared with placebo in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (40547,40592,40607). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that applying cream containing capsaicin 0.075% reduces pain similarly to 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster (40674). Topical cream containing capsaicin 0.075% (Zostrix-HP, Link Medical Products Pty Ltd.) is FDA-approved as an over-the-counter (OTC) medication for this indication (272). However, applying a capsaicin lotion less frequently or with a lower concentration of capsaicin does not seem to be beneficial. A small clinical study in patients with diabetic neuropathy shows that applying a specific lotion (Capsika-75 lotion, Bangkok Drug Company) containing capsaicin 0.075% three times daily for 8 weeks improves pain to a similar degree as a placebo lotion (102277). This study was limited by a high dropout rate, high placebo effect, and poor adherence to therapy. Furthermore, cream or gel (such as Capsika-25 gel, Bangkok Drug Company) containing lower amounts of capsaicin do not appear to be effective for reducing diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain (92984).
• Pain (chronic). Topical cream containing capsaicin can reduce chronic pain associated with various conditions. Topical capsaicin is FDA-approved for this use. Details: Several clinical studies show that topically applying cream containing capsaicin, the active capsicum constituent, 0.05% to 0.075% temporarily relieves chronic pain from rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, back pain, jaw pain, psoriasis, and neuropathic conditions (12401,17701). Capsaicin, used in topical preparations, is FDA-approved for these uses (272). It can take up to 14 days for the full analgesic effect. For neuropathic pain, the number needed to treat using capsaicin 0.075% for eight weeks is 5.7 (12401). For musculoskeletal pain, for every 8.1 patients treated with capsaicin 0.025%, 1 patient would achieve at least a 50% reduction in pain (12401). Also, applying capsaicin 0.05% (Finalgon CPD Warmecreme) three times daily for 21 days seems to cause a 49% reduction in chronic soft tissue pain when compared with placebo (17701).
• Postherpetic neuralgia. Applying a specific prescription patch containing capsaicin can reduce postherpetic neuralgia pain, especially in patients with the lowest pain scores. Details: Clinical research has evaluated the use of a specific patch (Qutenza, NeurogesX Inc.) containing capsaicin 8%, which is approved as a prescription medication by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Research in this population shows that applying a single patch for 60-90 minutes reduces average pain over 24 hours by 27% to 37% for up to 12 weeks, compared to only 4.4% to 26% in patients in the control group (40659,40679,40686,40691,40719,40728,40800,92985,96451,96452). The number needed to treat to achieve at least a 30% or 50% reduction in pain intensity is 10 and 12, respectively; the number needed to treat to achieve an additional beneficial outcome over placebo at 8 weeks and 12 weeks is 9 and 7, respectively (40800,96451). The pain reduction with this patch has an onset of a few days after treatment and the effect lasts for about 5 months (92986). However, some evidence shows that the reduction in pain is only significant for patients who have had postherpetic neuralgia for at least 6 months (40686). Additionally, the reduction in pain and duration of response appears to be greatest for patients with lower pain scores and low sensitivity to light touch at baseline, as well as patients not using concomitant systemic neuropathic pain medications, whereas patients with high pain scores, high sensitivity to touch, or those using systemic neuropathic pain medications experience the smallest and least sustained reduction in pain (40728,96458). Also, other evidence suggests that this patch may be less effective at relieving postherpetic neuralgia when compared with 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster (40688).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Back pain. Topical capsicum or capsaicin seems to be beneficial for reducing back pain. Details: A meta-analysis of generally low-quality clinical research, as well as individual studies, show that applying a capsicum-containing plaster providing 11 mg of capsaicin per plaster or 22 mcg of capsaicin per square centimeter of plaster to the back once daily in the morning for 4-8 hours reduces low back pain when compared with placebo (15259,15260,15261). Applying capsaicin 0.05% (Finalgon CPD Warmecreme) three times daily for 21 days seems to cause a 58% reduction in low back pain when compared with placebo (17701). Also, in a mixed group of patients with acute back or neck pain, a large clinical trial shows that four topical applications with a gel containing capsaicin 0.075% with diclofenac 2% every 12 hours modestly reduces pain on motion when compared with diclofenac alone or placebo. The number of patients with at least a 50% reduction in pain from baseline was modestly higher. Capsaicin 0.075% was similarly effective alone and when combined with diclofenac 2% (105202). However, only about half of the patients in this study had back pain.
• Cluster headache. Intranasal capsaicin seems to be beneficial for preventing cluster headaches. Its effect in the treatment of cluster headache is unclear. Details: Some clinical research shows that using the capsicum constituent capsaicin intranasally reduces the frequency of episodic or chronic cluster headache attacks (14323,14351,14352,14358). Capsaicin suspensions of 0.1 mL of a 10 mM suspension, providing 300 mcg/day of capsaicin, has been applied to the ipsilateral nostril. Applications are continued once daily until a burning sensation is no longer experienced (14351,14358). Intranasal application of capsaicin 0.025% (Zostrix, Rodlen Laboratories) might also decrease symptom severity during an acute cluster headache attack. Clinical research shows that daily treatment for 7 days decreases symptom severity over the following week (14353). Ipsilateral, or same side, nostril application of capsaicin appears to be more effective than contralateral application (14351). Due to severe pain associated with intranasal capsaicin administration, pretreatment with intranasal local anesthetic is usually used.
• Nonallergic rhinitis. Intranasal capsaicin in a dose of at least 0.1 mM seems to improve symptoms of nonallergic rhinitis. It is unclear if lower doses of capsaicin are beneficial. Details: Clinical research shows that repeated intranasal in-clinic treatments with capsaicin, the active capsicum constituent, or with capsicum oleoresin, over a period of one to three days, can significantly decrease symptoms of non-allergic, non-infectious perennial rhinitis symptoms (14328,14357,15016,40595,105204,105205). A decrease of symptoms has been observed for up to 6-9 months following these treatments (14328,14357). The following doses have been used: capsaicin 0.15 mg per dose for up to 7 doses over a 14-day period (14328), capsaicin 0.0033 mol once weekly for 5 weeks (14357), capsaicin 15 mcg/0.1 mL applied three times daily for 3 days (15016), and capsaicin 1-4 mcg per puff, applied 3 times in each nostril daily for 3 days (40595). Due to severe pain associated with intranasal capsaicin administration, pretreatment with intranasal local anesthetic is usually used. Personal use of an intranasal spray with a lower dose of capsaicin might also be effective. Clinical research shows that two 0.4 mL puffs with an intranasal spray in each nostril daily for 4 weeks providing capsaicin 0.01 mM, but not 0.001 mM, is more effective than placebo for reducing symptoms of idiopathic rhinitis. This benefit is maintained for an additional 8 weeks. This protocol was at least as effective as receiving five repeated hourly intranasal spray treatments in hospital with capsaicin 0.1 mM (105204).
• Osteoarthritis. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) conditionally recommends topical capsaicin for knee osteoarthritis, but not for hip or hand osteoarthritis. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 preliminary clinical trials shows that using topical capsaicin 0.025% four times daily has modest benefit for osteoarthritis when compared with placebo. Using capsaicin 0.0125% doesn't seem to be effective (102408). The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) conditionally recommends topical capsaicin for knee osteoarthritis. However, it does not recommend its use for hip osteoarthritis due to the depth of the joint beneath the skin surface, nor for hand osteoarthritis, due to the risk for contamination of the eye (102114).
• Pain (acute). Topical capsicum seems to be beneficial for reducing acute pain due to trauma. Details: Clinical research in patients with trauma-related acute pain shows that topical application with a gel (Sanli Gel) containing capsaicin 0.05% three times daily for 3 days reduces pain by at least 50% in 87% of patients, compared with 63% of those using a piroxicam gel 0.5% (Felden). There was also a significantly greater number of patients with a final pain score of 4 or less. In the capsaicin group, only 12% of patients did not achieve either of these endpoints, compared with 31% in the group receiving piroxicam (105197).
• Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Applying topical capsicum to acupoints seems to be beneficial for preventing PONV. Details: Clinical research shows that applying a capsicum-containing plaster to acupoints on the hand and forearm 30 minutes prior to anesthesia and leaving in place for 6-8 hours daily for up to 3 days after surgery reduces the incidence of PONV by about 29% to 36% when compared to control (40405,40483,40610). Plasters used in these studies included Sinsin PAS (Sinsin Pharm Co.), which is standardized to contain capsicum 345.8 mg and capsicum tincture 34.58 mg per sheet (40405,40610); and Johnson's Perforated Capsicum Plaster (Johnson & Johnson Ltd.), which is standardized to contain capsicum oleoresin 1% w/w (40483).
• Postoperative pain. Applying topical capsicum-containing plaster to acupoints seems to be beneficial for reducing postoperative pain. It is unclear if a capsicum patch or capsaicin instillation prior to wound closure is beneficial for reducing postoperative pain. Details: Some clinical research shows that applying a capsicum-containing plaster to acupoints on the hands or near the knees of adults or children 30 minutes prior to anesthesia, and leaving in place for 6-8 hours daily for up to 3 days after surgery, reduces the amount of rescue analgesics needed by 29% to 39% within the first 24 hours and by 16% to 19% within the first 48 hours when compared to control (40405,40483,40520,40524,40610). The capsicum-containing plaster used in these studies (Sinsin PAS, Sinsin Pharm Co.) is standardized to contain capsicum 345.8 mg and capsicum tincture 34.58 mg per sheet (40520,40610). Other preliminary clinical research shows that applying a single patch containing the capsicum constituent capsaicin 8% (Qutenza, NeurogesX Inc.) for 30-60 minutes leads to an improvement in overall health status and an average 22% reduction in pain that lasts up to 12 weeks in patients with postoperative and posttraumatic neuropathic pain. Patches were applied to various parts of the body, including the legs, torso, feet, hands, arms, head, and neck, and the reduction in pain continued with the use of a second and third patch application. The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group (96452). Other clinical evidence suggests that instilling capsaicin 15 mg during surgery immediately prior to wound closure reduces the need for pain medication for up to 2 weeks postoperatively when compared with placebo (40741).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if intranasal capsaicin is beneficial for preventing allergic rhinitis symptoms. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that intranasal treatment with cotton wads soaked in the active capsicum constituent capsaicin 30 mcM, applied for 15 minutes and repeated over two days, reduces the severity of experimentally-induced allergic rhinitis. The severity of symptoms seems to be reduced for up to 2 months after treatment (14324). However, contradictory research shows that patients with allergic rhinitis caused by house dust mites do not have significantly improved symptoms after using a capsaicin solution providing 0.15 mg/dose for up to 7 doses over a 14-day period when compared with placebo (14360).
• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). Although there is interest in using oral capsicum for ALS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of capsicum for this condition.
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral capsaicin is beneficial for improving athletic performance; the available research is limited to small, conflicting studies. Details: Several small clinical studies in physically active young adults show that taking capsaicin might improve some measures of athletic performance, but results are mixed overall (99409,99410,102276,105191,105198,105200). A meta-analysis of these and several other small clinical studies shows that taking the capsicum constituents capsaicin or capsiate 45 minutes before exercise improves measures of muscular endurance but does not improve aerobic endurance when compared with placebo. Doses of the capsicum constituents ranged from 1.2-24 mg, with most studies assessing a single 12 mg dose (111515). The included studies have a number of methodological problems that limit the validity of the findings, such as a small sample size, short study duration, and insufficient blinding. Also, most of the study participants were male. Other small clinical studies not included in the meta-analysis also show conflicting results. One small clinical study in untrained young adults undergoing resistance training shows that taking capsiate, a capsaicin analog, 6 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks improves upper body, but not lower body, weightlifting performance when compared with placebo (109024). However, another small clinical trial in experienced male athletes shows that taking cayenne (GNC Nature's Fingerprint Cayenne Herbal Supplement) 3 grams, providing capsaicin 25.8 mg, daily for 7 days does not improve sprint time, rate of perceived exertion, or muscle soreness over three days when compared with placebo (105206). Capsicum has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. One small clinical study in untrained males shows that taking a supplement containing capsicum extract 66.7 mg, caffeine 400 mg, black pepper extract 10 mg, and niacin 40 mg prior to exercising does not improve strength, time to exhaustion, or maximal oxygen consumption when compared with placebo (37873).
• Burning mouth syndrome. It is unclear if applying topical capsaicin in the mouth is beneficial for burning mouth syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical studies show that using 15 mL of a mouth rinse containing the active capsicum constituent capsaicin 0.02% for 30 seconds daily for 7-21 days modestly decreases burning discomfort when compared to baseline in patients with burning mouth syndrome (92991,105195). Other preliminary clinical research shows that applying 0.5 mL of a gel containing capsaicin 0.01% or 0.025% to the tongue three times daily for 14 days modestly reduces pain when compared to baseline in patients with burning mouth syndrome. The gel is spread with a cotton swab, and no food or drink is consumed for 30 minutes after application (96456). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group, the small number of patients, and occasionally unclear statistical comparisons.
• Cancer. It is unclear if eating more chili is beneficial for preventing mortality due to cancer. Details: Population research has found that consuming chili more than four times weekly is not associated with a reduced odds of cancer mortality (105208). Also, other population research has found that any consumption of hot red chili peppers is not associated with a reduced odds of mortality related to cancer (105210).
• Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS). Preliminary clinical research suggests that topical capsaicin might be beneficial for reducing symptoms of CHS. Details: One small clinical study in adults presenting to an emergency department (ED) with CHS shows that applying 5 grams of a cream containing capsaicin 0.1% to the abdomen modestly reduces nausea severity at 60 minutes, but not 30 minutes, when compared with a placebo cream. Nausea was completely resolved in 29% of patients, compared with 0% of those using the placebo cream. However, there was no difference in vomiting at 30 or 120 minutes (105193). This study may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference in some of these outcomes. A meta-analysis of two small, low-quality studies involving the topical use of capsaicin on the abdomen, chest, and possibly back, shows that the mean time to resolution of symptoms was 326 minutes and the mean length of stay in the emergency department was 379 minutes. However, it is unclear how these times compare to the use of placebo or standard antiemetics. This study also conducted a systematic review of the available literature, which indicates that the creams most commonly used in research provide 0.025% to 0.1% capsaicin (105201). Two low-quality, retrospective reviews also suggest that capsaicin cream may be beneficial for CHS. A retrospective review of patients in the ED with CHS has found that applying capsaicin cream 0.025% is associated with a 39% shorter time to discharge when compared with control. Patients treated with capsaicin also required fewer additional rescue treatments when compared with control (109021). Another retrospective review of patients in the ED with CHS also suggests that capsaicin cream 0.025% modestly reduces abdominal pain when compared with baseline. However, 47% and 28% of patients, respectively, received additional antiemetics or an opioid after the use of the cream (105345).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if eating more chili is beneficial for preventing mortality due to CVD. Details: Population research has found that consuming chili more than four times weekly is associated with a 34% reduced odds of CVD mortality when compared with never or rarely consuming chili, as well as 44% and 61% reduced odds of ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular death, respectively (105208). Other population research has found that consumption of hot red chili peppers is not associated with a reduced odds of mortality related to CVD when compared with not eating hot red chili peppers (105210).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral capsaicin is beneficial for gestational diabetes. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking chili powder containing capsaicin 5 mg daily for 4 weeks modestly reduces total cholesterol levels and reduces postprandial blood glucose levels by an average of 36 mg/dL and postprandial insulin levels by an average of 14 IU/L in patients with gestational diabetes. Compared to a placebo group, these changes are significant. However, capsaicin intake does not alter fasting plasma glucose or insulin levels (96457).
• Dry skin. It is unclear if oral capsicum is beneficial for dry skin. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adult females with low skin moisture shows that taking paprika oil extract 400 mg, standardized to include 9 mg of xanthophyll, orally daily for 4 weeks improves skin moisture and viscoelasticity scores, but not the number of wrinkles, when compared with control (109026).
• Dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral capsicum is beneficial for reducing lipid levels. Details: A meta-analysis of three or four mainly small clinical trials in healthy adults shows that taking capsicum does not improve levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol when compared with no treatment or placebo. However, there was a small to moderate effect on levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Freshly chopped chili or fermented red pepper were studied for 4 and 12 weeks, respectively (105194). It is unclear if capsicum can lower lipid levels in patients with dyslipidemia or hyperlipidemia.
• Dyspepsia. It is unclear if oral capsicum is beneficial for dyspepsia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking red pepper powder 2.5 grams daily in three divided doses for 5 weeks reduces symptoms of functional dyspepsia when compared with placebo. However, in some patients, there seems to be a worsening of symptoms prior to any improvement (12410).
• Fibromyalgia. It is unclear if oral capsicum is beneficial for fibromyalgia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying cream containing the active capsicum constituent capsaicin 0.025% four times daily to tender points for 4 weeks reduces localized tenderness in patients with fibromyalgia (7038). Other preliminary clinical research shows that applying capsaicin 0.075% cream (Sensedol) three times daily to tender points for 6 weeks in addition to standard therapy increases the pain threshold when compared with standard therapy in patients with severe fibromyalgia (92979). However, capsaicin does not appear to reduce overall pain or improve physical function in patients with fibromyalgia (7038,92979). Also, the long-term effects of capsaicin on fibromyalgia-related pain are unclear.
• Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Although there is interest in using oral capsicum for GERD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of capsicum for this condition.
• HIV/AIDS-related peripheral neuropathy. It is unclear if topical capsaicin is beneficial for this condition. Details: There is conflicting evidence regarding the effects of Qutenza (NeurogesX Inc.), which contains the active constituent of capsicum, capsaicin 8%. Although some research shows it reduces pain in patients with HIV and peripheral neuropathy (22395), other research shows no significant benefit (40746). A meta-analysis of results from both of these studies shows that applying a single capsaicin 8% patch for 30-90 minutes reduces pain intensity by at least 30% in about 30% more patients when compared to control (40800). Additional meta-analyses of the results from these two studies suggests that pain reduction with capsaicin begins a few days after treatment and lasts for about 5 months, with a number needed to treat of 11 to achieve at least a 30% reduction in pain intensity (92986,96451). Reduction in pain and duration of response appears to be greatest for females with lower pain scores at baseline, whereas males with high pain scores at baseline experience the smallest and least sustained reduction in pain (96458). Some research has also evaluated topical capsaicin 0.075%. One small clinical study shows that applying this cream does not relieve symptoms of HIV-associated peripheral neuropathy when compared with placebo (3891).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral capsicum is beneficial for lowering blood pressure. Details: Two meta-analyses of small clinical trials show that taking capsicum as freshly chopped chili, fermented red pepper, red pepper capsules, or capsinoid capsules orally daily for 4-12 weeks does not reduce systolic or diastolic blood pressure when compared with control. However, most subjects included in these clinical trials did not have hypertension (105194,109025).
• Intermetatarsal neuroma. It is unclear if injecting capsaicin into the third intermetatarsal space is beneficial for intermetatarsal neuroma. Details: Clinical research in adults with intermetatarsal neuroma shows that a single injection of capsaicin 0.1 mg into the third intermetatarsal space 5 minutes after administration of 2 mL of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine leads to a modest reduction in pain at weeks 1 and 4, but not weeks 2 and 3, when compared with placebo. Capsaicin also reduces the extent to which pain interferes with walking and mood, but not with work, sleep, relationships, or general activity (96454).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). It is unclear if oral capsicum is beneficial for IBS. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking ground guajillo chili 1 gram, containing capsaicin 0.112%, with each meal for 7 days does not reduce symptoms of IBS (12403). A small clinical study shows that taking chili (Nguan Soon Co., Ltd.) 2.1 grams, providing 2.5 mg capsaicin, daily before meals for 6 weeks does not improve abdominal burning, fecal urgency, or abdominal pain or bloating after a spicy meal. However, there was a modest reduction in abdominal burning after a spicy meal (105207). This study may not have been adequately powered to detect a difference in some of these outcomes.
• Laryngitis. Although there is interest in gargling with capsicum for laryngitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of capsicum for this condition.
• Motion sickness. Although there is interest in oral capsicum for motion sickness, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of capsicum for this condition.
• Myofascial pain syndrome. It is unclear if topical capsaicin is beneficial for myofascial pain syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a specific capsaicin cream (Dipental Cream, Dalim BioTech) containing capsaicin 0.25 mg/gram along with a ketoprofen 30 mg patch (KetotopVRPlaster, Pacific Pharma) to the trapezius does not reduce pain when compared with a ketoprofen patch alone in patients with myofascial pain (92983).
• Neck pain. It is unclear if topical capsaicin is beneficial for neck pain. Details: In a group of patients with acute back or neck pain, a large clinical trial shows that four topical applications with a gel containing capsaicin 0.075% with diclofenac 2% every 12 hours modestly reduces pain on motion when compared with diclofenac alone or placebo. The number of patients with at least a 50% reduction in pain from baseline was modestly higher. Capsaicin 0.075% was similarly effective alone or when combined with diclofenac 2% (105202). However, only about half of the patients in this study had neck pain.
• Neuropathic pain. It is unclear if topical capsicum is beneficial for neuropathic pain. Details: A very small study in adults with neuropathic pain secondary to spinal cord injury shows that applying a patch containing the capsicum constituent capsaicin 8% for 60 minutes daily to the affected area for 12 weeks reduces pain at weeks 2 and 4 and improves mobility, but not quality of life, for up to 12 weeks when compared with placebo (111517). The validity of these findings is limited by insufficient blinding and the small sample size.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral capsicum is beneficial for obesity. Details: A meta-analysis of 3-5 small clinical trials shows that taking capsicum does not reduce body weight, body fat, or body mass index (BMI) in individuals with a BMI of at least 25 kg/m2 when compared with placebo or no treatment. Freshly chopped chili, fermented red pepper, or capsicum constituents were studied for 4-12 weeks (105194). In one clinical trial included in the analysis, taking capsinoids 3 mg twice daily 30 minutes prior to eating for 12 weeks reduced abdominal fat by about 1%, but did not significantly reduce body weight, when compared with placebo (40599). In overweight individuals, one small clinical trial shows that taking a specific chili extract 200 mg, formulated with fenugreek dietary fiber for sustained release (Capsifen, Akay Natural Ingredients), providing capsaicinoids 4 mg daily for 28 days reduces body weight and BMI by about 2% when compared with placebo. There was no effect on blood pressure (105196). Capsicum has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients, with some evidence of benefit. One study evaluated a combination product (Prograde Metabolism) containing capsicum extract (Capsimax, OmniActive Health Technologies), raspberry ketone (Razberi K, Integrity Nutraceuticals), caffeine, garlic root extract, ginger root extract, bitter orange fruit (Advantra Z, Nutratech Inc), L-theanine, and black pepper fruit extract (Biperine, Sabinsa Corporation) twice daily for 8 weeks (40802).
• Overall mortality. Eating chili may be beneficial for preventing mortality. It is unclear if taking capsicum supplements is beneficial for preventing overall mortality. Details: Population research has found that consuming chili is associated with a reduced risk of overall mortality. In one study, eating chili more than four times weekly was associated with a 23% reduced odds of overall mortality when compared with never or rarely consuming chili (105208). Other population research has found that any consumption of hot red chili peppers is associated with a 13% reduced odds of mortality when compared with not eating these peppers (105210). Also, eating spicy foods at least once each week, consisting mainly of fresh chili pepper, dried chili pepper, chili sauce, or chili oil, was associated with at least a 10% reduced risk of death when compared with eating these foods less than once a week (105211).
• Peptic ulcers. It is unclear if oral capsicum is beneficial for peptic ulcers. Details: Population research has found that eating capsicum fruit (chili) an average of 24 times per month is associated with a reduced likelihood of having an ulcer when compared with eating chili an average of 8 times per month. This applies to chili in the form of chili powder, chili sauce, curry powder, and other chili-containing foods (12053). However, clinical research shows that consuming chili peppers 1 gram three times daily for 4 weeks does not improve duodenal ulcer healing when compared to control (40828).
• Peripheral neuropathy. Preliminary clinical research suggests that topical capsaicin might be beneficial for reducing peripheral neuropathy pain. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying patches containing the capsicum constituent capsaicin 8% (Qutenza, NeurogesX Inc.) reduces pain in people with non-diabetic peripheral neuropathy (96452,111516). Up to four patches, applied to different painful areas, are used at one time and are left in place for 30 minutes on the feet, or 60 minutes on other parts of the body such as the legs, torso, hands, arms, head, or neck (96452). After an interval of at least 90 days, treatment can be repeated, with new patches applied for 30-60 minutes (99407). There is an average 27% reduction in pain when compared to baseline, lasting up to 12 weeks (96452). Another similar study reported a decrease of 1 point, on a 10-point pain scale, in the typical daily pain intensity (99407). The validity of these findings is limited by methodological problems, including the lack of control groups. Further research shows that using a single application of up to four capsaicin 8% patches for 30-60 minutes, or taking pregabalin orally, 150-600 mg in 2-3 divided doses daily for 8 weeks, reduces the intensity and area of dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA, pain evoked by light brushing of the skin) in people with non-diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Complete resolution of DMA occurred in 24% of people using the patches, and 12% of those taking pregabalin (99408). The validity of these findings is limited by methodological problems, including a lack of blinding.
• Prurigo nodularis. It is unclear if topical capsaicin is beneficial for prurigo nodularis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a cream containing the active capsicum constituent, capsaicin 0.025% to 0.3%, 4-6 times daily improves burning sensations, erythema, pruritus, and healing of skin lesions over a period of 2 weeks to 33 months when compared to baseline. Symptoms may return after discontinuation of therapy (10650).
• Sinonasal polyposis. It is unclear if intranasal capsaicin is beneficial for sinonasal polyposis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with severe sinonasal polyposis shows that intranasal application of 0.5 mL of a 30 mmol/L capsaicin solution to each nostril for 3 days, followed by 0.5 mL of a 100 mmol/L capsaicin solution for 2 days, can cause significant subjective improvement in symptoms as well as objective improvement in nose/sinus air volume and endoscopy scores; however, capsaicin does not seem to significantly affect eosinophil cationic protein levels (14359).
• Swallowing dysfunction. Preliminary research shows that oral capsaicin might be beneficial for improving swallowing ability. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that elderly patients at risk for aspiration pneumonia due to swallowing dysfunction have improved swallowing reflexes after dissolving a lozenge containing capsaicin 1.5 mcg in the mouth before each meal when compared with using a placebo lozenge (13100). Preliminary clinical research also shows that capsaicin may be beneficial in patients with swallowing dysfunction due to stroke (102278,105192). One study shows that taking 1 mL of nectar containing capsaicin 150 mcM/L with each meal daily for 3 weeks, in addition to thermal tactile stimulation, improves eating and swallowing when compared with using thermal tactile stimulation and placebo nectar (102278). Another study shows that 20 minutes of stimulation with an ice swab containing capsaicin 0.15 mM before lunch and dinner daily for three weeks modestly improves the ability to swallow water when compared with ice stimulation alone. After treatment, approximately 70% of those using the capsaicin ice were able to drink the water without choking, compared with only 33% in those using ice alone (105192). Capsaicin solution has also been administered by nebulizer. A clinical study in patients with swallowing dysfunction secondary to hemorrhagic stroke shows that inhaling capsaicin solution twice daily for one week reduces the incidence of post-swallow residue and pulmonary infection and increases number of coughs in response to capsaicin compared with placebo. However, treatment with nebulized capsaicin does not reduce the number of patients with swallow or cough reflexes compared with control (111518). More evidence is needed to rate capsicum for these uses.

(Read more about CAPSICUM)

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Taking oral choline before exercise does not improve athletic performance. Details: Clinical research in trained athletes shows that taking oral choline 2.43 grams as a single dose does not delay fatigue during endurance sports when compared with placebo (5164). Other clinical research in untrained adults shows that taking oral choline 8.425 grams or 50 mg/kg once prior to participating in exhaustive, load-carrying exercise does not improve dexterity, upper or lower body strength, grip strength, or run time-to-exhaustion following exercise when compared with placebo (42229,42237).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial in patients with age-related cognitive decline. Details: Small clinical studies in adults with memory loss shows that taking choline 2 grams four times daily orally for 21 days does not improve memory when compared with placebo (5170). Observational research in adults over 60 years of age has found that intake of choline 187-399.5 mg daily is associated with a 33% to 42% reduced odds of low cognitive function when compared with intake of less than 187 mg daily. Intake of more than 399.5 mg daily was not associated with low cognitive function when compared with less than 187 mg daily (109100).
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial in patients with allergic rhinitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking oral choline, as tricholine citrate, 500 mg three times daily for 8 weeks is less effective than intranasal budesonide 200 mcg twice daily for reducing symptoms of allergic rhinitis (42252).
• Alzheimer disease. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for Alzheimer disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Asthma. Small clinical studies suggest that oral choline may modestly improve symptoms in patients with asthma. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking choline 500-1000 mg orally three times daily for 3-4 months decreases the severity of symptoms, the number of symptomatic days, and the need to use bronchodilators in patients with asthma when compared with placebo (5165,5166). Preliminary data also shows that choline 3 grams daily might be more effective than 1.5 grams daily (5165).
• Autism spectrum disorder. Oral choline has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of donepezil 2.5-5 mg daily and choline bitartrate 350 mg daily for 12 weeks improves receptive language skills, but no other outcomes, for up to 6 months after treatment when compared with placebo in children aged 5-10 years with autism spectrum disorder. Also, adolescents aged 11-16 years experienced no benefits, and some experienced an increase in behavioral symptoms, such as irritability (103571). It is unclear if this effect is due to choline, donepezil, or the combination.
• Breast Cancer. It is unclear if dietary intake of choline reduces the risk of breast cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 low to moderate-quality observational studies suggests that neither high nor low dietary intake of choline is associated with breast cancer risk. This finding is largely influenced by inclusion of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition (EPIC) cohort study, which analyzed data from over 300,000 subjects. However, subanalysis of 3 case-control studies suggests that high dietary intake of choline may be associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer when compared with low choline intake (111416). The interpretation of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies, self-reported data, and a small number of studies.
• Bronchitis. Although there has been interest in using oral and inhaled choline for bronchitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Cancer. It is unclear if dietary choline intake reduces the risk for cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of 11 low-quality population studies has found that high dietary intake of choline is associated with an 18% lower risk of cancer when compared with low choline intake. High dietary intake of both choline and betaine was associated with a 40% lower risk of cancer (97390).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if dietary choline intake reduces the risk of CVD or improves outcomes in patients with CVD. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that high intake of dietary choline is not associated with a lower risk of coronary artery disease, stroke, or mortality when compared with a diet low in choline (97388). A more recent population study has found that energy-adjusted total choline intake is not associated with the incidence of CVD over ten years. However, the highest intake of free choline is associated with a 34% reduced risk of CVD when compared with the lowest intake (109104).
• Cerebellar ataxia. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial in patients with cerebellar ataxia. Details: Despite some anecdotal reports suggesting that taking choline improves motor function, preliminary clinical research shows that taking choline 4-5 grams orally daily for 4 days to 6 weeks does not reduce cerebellar ataxia (5161,5173,23679).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial for improving cognitive function in healthy adults. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of choline 50 mg/kg orally prior to participating in an exhaustive, load-carrying task does not improve reaction time, reasoning, memory, or serial addition and subtraction ability following the task when compared with placebo (42237). Also, preliminary clinical research in patients requiring long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN) shows that adding choline chloride 2 grams daily to TPN for 24 weeks might improve delayed visual memory, but does not improve other measures of cognitive performance, when compared with TPN alone (42232).
• Cirrhosis. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for cirrhosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Complex partial seizures. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for complex partial seizures, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Dementia. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for dementia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of depression. Details: Observational research has found that dietary choline intake of at least 198 mg daily is associated with a 32% to 43% decreased risk of depressive symptoms when compared with intakes of less than 198 mg daily (109106). It is unclear if choline supplementation is beneficial for depression.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of type 2 diabetes; the available research is conflicting. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking oral choline bitartrate 1000 mg daily for 2 months does not affect coagulation parameters or levels of triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes (103569). Choline has also been evaluated for the prevention of type 2 diabetes. In Finnish males, observational research has found that dietary intake of total choline at levels of more than 482 mg daily, especially as phosphatidylcholine, is associated with a 25% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes over the following 19.3 years when compared with intakes of less than 382 mg daily (103567). However, in males and females in the US, additional observational research has found no association between dietary choline and risk of type 2 diabetes over a mean of 9 years (103570). In addition, a sub-analysis found that the highest intakes of choline (a median of 487 mg daily) were associated with a 54% higher risk of type 2 diabetes among females, but not males, when compared with the lowest intakes (a median of 175 mg daily) (103570). Population research in patients with diabetes has found that an intake of dietary choline in amounts of at least 279 mg daily is associated with a 2.1-fold increased odds of diabetic retinopathy in females, but not males, when compared with an intake less than 206 mg daily (109102). It is unclear if choline itself is responsible for the increased odds of diabetic retinopathy in this population.
• Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). It is unclear if oral choline improves cognition in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). Details: Clinical research in children aged 2.5-5 years with FASD shows that taking oral choline bitartrate, providing choline 500 mg, daily for 9 months does not improve global cognitive development or hippocampal-dependent memory when compared with placebo. However, a subgroup analysis of only children aged 2.5-4 years suggests that choline may improve hippocampal-dependent memory (92112). Follow-up of this study at 7 years shows that choline improves motor speed and suggests a trend towards improved color naming, which are components of executive functioning testing, when compared with placebo (111745). The validity of these findings is limited by the high rate of patient discontinuation which limits statistical power. A small clinical trial in children 5-10 years old with FASD shows that taking oral glycerophosphocholine, providing choline 625 mg, daily for 6 weeks does not improve cognitive function, executive function, attention, or hyperactivity when compared with placebo (97389).
• Hepatitis. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for hepatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Huntington disease. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for Huntington disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of hypertension. Details: Population research has found that every 100-mg increase in daily dietary choline intake is associated with a 15% decreased risk of developing hypertension over the next 4.6 to 9.1 years (109098). However, it is unclear if any benefits are specifically related to dietary choline or whether choline supplementation is beneficial.
• Infant development. It is unclear if oral choline intake during pregnancy is beneficial for infant development; the available research is conflicting. Details: Two observational studies have found that higher intake of choline during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy is associated with improvement in offspring cognitive development and visual memory at the age of 18 months and 7 years, respectively, when compared with lower choline intake (94654,94657). One of these studies found that each 1 mcmol/L increase in maternal blood levels of choline at 16 weeks' gestation was associated with a 2.23-point increase in cognitive skill score based on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-III) at 18 months of age (94657). Also, some observational research has found that higher plasma levels of choline during pregnancy are associated with higher processing speed and decreased social withdrawal at 4 years of age in the offspring (109101). In contrast, 3 observational studies have found that higher intake of choline during pregnancy, as well as higher maternal and cord blood levels of choline, are not associated with improved offspring intelligence at 5 years of age or cognitive performance at 3 or 7 years of age (94654,94655,94656). However, many of these observational studies, including those with positive findings, included populations with a mean intake of choline that was below the recommended adequate intake of 450 mg daily (94654,94656). It's possible that higher intake of choline is needed to observe a benefit; however, research on the effects of choline supplementation is limited. One small clinical trial shows that taking choline 930 mg daily during the third trimester modestly improves sustained attention in the child at 7 years of age when compared with taking 480 mg daily (109105).
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial in patients with metabolic syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with metabolic syndrome shows that taking oral choline 400 mg daily for 4 weeks does not decrease body weight, blood pressure, plasma glucose levels, or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, or increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, when compared with baseline (105731).
• Neural tube birth defects. It is unclear if oral choline intake is beneficial for preventing neural tube defects. Details: Population research has found that females who have a high dietary choline intake around the time of conception have a lower risk of having offspring with a neural tube defect when compared to those with lower intake (13134).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral choline is beneficial in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Details: A cross-sectional analysis of results from observational and clinical research shows that low dietary intake of choline is associated with increased fibrosis in postmenopausal adults with NAFLD, but not in children, males, or premenopausal adults with NAFLD. Dietary choline intake was not associated with steatosis severity in any patient subgroup (92109).
• Schizophrenia. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for schizophrenia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• Tourette syndrome. Although there has been interest in using oral choline for Tourette syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of choline for this purpose.
• TPN-associated hepatic steatosis. It is unclear if intravenous choline is beneficial in patients with TPN-associated hepatic steatosis. Details: In patients receiving long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN), plasma levels of choline can decrease. Small, low-quality clinical studies show that administering intravenous choline 1-4 grams daily for 24 weeks improves some markers of TPN-associated hepatic steatosis when compared with baseline or placebo (5174,42235). More evidence is needed to rate choline for these uses.

(Read more about CHOLINE)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alzheimer disease. Although there has been interest in using oral green coffee for Alzheimer disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of green coffee for this condition.
• Diabetes. Although there has been interest in using oral green coffee for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of green coffee for this condition.
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral green coffee is beneficial for hypercholesterolemia. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical trials shows that taking green coffee extract modestly reduces levels of total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and increases levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), when compared to placebo. There was no effect on triglyceride levels (111048). These changes are unlikely to be clinically significant. In addition, this analysis is limited by the significant heterogeneity of the patient populations and any effect of green coffee extract in patients with hyperlipidemia is unclear. A small preliminary clinical study included in this meta-analysis in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that drinking a beverage containing soluble green coffee 0.7 grams and soluble roasted coffee 1.3 grams (containing chlorogenic acids 148.4 mg per serving) three times daily for 8 weeks reduces LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglycerides when compared with baseline (103957). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Furthermore, it is unclear if the benefits are due to green coffee, roasted coffee, or the combination.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral green coffee extract is beneficial for lowering blood pressure. Details: Two small clinical studies in Japanese adults with mild, untreated hypertension show that taking green coffee extracts providing 50-140 mg chlorogenic acids daily for 4-12 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure by 5-10 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by 3-7 mmHg when compared with placebo (17971,17972).
• Metabolic syndrome. Oral green coffee extract seems to improve some, but not all, measures of metabolic syndrome. Details: In patients with metabolic syndrome, clinical research shows that taking green coffee extract (Arjuna Natural Extracts Ltd) 400 mg twice daily for 8 weeks improves some measures of metabolic syndrome when compared with placebo. Systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, insulin resistance, and waist circumference were reduced by a small amount, but there was no effect on glycated hemoglobin, lipid profile, or diastolic blood pressure (104831).
• Obesity. Oral green coffee extract may have a small effect on weight loss. Details: A meta-analysis of 13 clinical studies in patients with overweight or obesity shows that taking either green coffee extract 90-1000 mg, containing chlorogenic acids 30-500 mg, or pure chlorogenic acid 1200 mg daily for 8-12 weeks reduces weight by about 2 kg and body mass index (BMI) by 0.56 kg/m2 when compared with placebo (103954). Individual clinical studies have used a specific green coffee extract (Svetol, Naturex) (17982,17983). In the meta-analysis, there was no clear dose-response relationship (103954). This weight loss is unlikely to be clinically significant. In addition, this analysis is limited by the significant heterogeneity of the included studies and patient populations. In 2014 a trial reporting efficacy of a green coffee extract for treatment of obesity was determined to be "seriously flawed" by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), resulting in its retraction by the authors and payment of a significant fine by the sponsoring company (Applied Food Sciences, Inc.) (88168,88169). This flawed study was not included in the 2020 meta-analysis (103954). In contrast to these findings, some clinical research has shown that taking green coffee does not reduce body weight. In one study, taking polyphenols 300 mg twice daily alone or in combination with oat-derived beta-glucans does not affect body weight or body composition when compared to baseline (109208). Also, in overweight or obese patients with breast cancer, a small clinical trial shows that taking green coffee extract (Arjuna Natural Extracts Ltd) 400 mg twice daily for 12 weeks does not affect body weight, body composition, or glycemic indices, when compared with placebo (111046).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral green coffee extract is beneficial for PCOS. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with PCOS shows that taking green coffee extract (Bonyan Salamat Kasra Company, Iran) 400 mg daily for 6 weeks modestly decreases total cholesterol and triglyceride levels when compared with taking placebo. However, there was no effect on glycemic indices, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or body weight (111047). More evidence is needed to rate green coffee for these uses.

(Read more about GREEN COFFEE)

EFFECTIVE

• L-carnitine deficiency. Oral and intravenous L-carnitine can treat primary and secondary L-carnitine deficiency. Details: Administering L-carnitine orally or intravenously is effective for acute or chronic treatment of primary L-carnitine deficiency or secondary L-carnitine deficiency due to inborn errors of metabolism. This is an FDA-approved indication for L-carnitine (4949,58611,59018). For primary or secondary deficiencies, oral L-carnitine 990 mg 2-3 times daily is used. For inborn errors of metabolism resulting in secondary L-carnitine deficiency, L-carnitine 50 mg/kg given as a slow (2-3 minute) bolus injection or by infusion followed by 50 mg/kg administered in divided doses every 3-4 hours over the next 24 hours is also used. Subsequent daily maintenance doses of intravenous L-carnitine are usually around 50 mg/kg (3616).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Angina. Oral and intravenous L-carnitine may improve exercise tolerance and symptoms of angina during exercise in patients with angina. Details: Several small clinical trials in patients with chronic stable angina or cardiac syndrome X show that taking L-carnitine orally or intravenously seems to improve exercise tolerance and time to onset of angina when compared with placebo (3623,3624,58156,59096,59118,59216,59217,59230). Oral doses of L-carnitine have ranged from 900 mg to 2 grams daily in single or divided doses for 2 weeks to 6 months (3623,3624,58156,59096,59118,59217). Intravenous L-carnitine 3 grams in 500 mL of 5% dextrose, administered once daily for 14 days (59230), or intravenous DL-carnitine 40 mg/kg administered 30 minutes prior to exercise (59216) have also been used.
• Congestive heart failure (CHF). Oral and intravenous L-carnitine may improve exercise capacity and symptoms of heart failure in patients with CHF. Details: Several small clinical trials in patients with CHF show that taking L-carnitine 1.5-3 grams daily in single or divided doses for up to 34 months or administering intravenous L-carnitine 5 grams daily for 7 days seems to improve symptoms and increase exercise capacity when compared with placebo (3625,3626,58145,58771,58824). Also, taking a specific combination product containing L-carnitine 2250 mg and coenzyme Q10 270 mg (Carni Q-Gel, Tishcon Corporation) daily for 12 weeks appears to improve symptoms of CHF when compared with no treatment (58392).
• Hyperlipidemia. Oral or intravenous L-carnitine may slightly improve lipid levels. Oral, but not intravenous, L-carnitine may also improve lipoprotein(a) levels in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a). Details: Most meta-analyses of clinical research in patients with or without hyperlipidemia show that L-carnitine, given orally at a dose of 76 mg to 3 grams daily or intravenously at a dose of 15-20 mg/kg three times weekly, appears to reduce total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride levels by up to 9.5 mg/dL, 8.3 mg/dL, and 11.2 mg/dL, respectively, while increasing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by up to 1.6 mg/dL. Sub-analyses in patients with elevated levels of specific lipids shows that L-carnitine might be most beneficial in these populations (95073,102019,111886). However, clinical research is generally very low to moderate quality. Also, any effects of L-carnitine on these lipids are modest and might not be considered clinically significant. An umbrella meta-analysis of meta-analyses of clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine orally reduces total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels by only 1.1 mg/dL, 4.8 mg/dL, and 2.5 mg/dL, with increases in HDL cholesterol of 0.7 mg/dL (111896). More information is needed on the effects of L-carnitine on lipid levels specifically in patients with hyperlipidemia. Some research has also evaluated the benefits of L-carnitine in people with hyperlipidemia and elevated lipoprotein(a) levels or those undergoing hemodialysis. Preliminary clinical research and a meta-analysis of clinical research in these populations shows that taking L-carnitine 1-2 grams daily for 8-24 weeks reduces levels of lipoprotein(a) by about 9 mg/dL when compared with control (58155,95073). However, giving L-carnitine intravenously 1 gram three times weekly or 4 grams daily does not improve lipoprotein(a) levels in these patients (95073). Also, oral or intravenous L-carnitine does not improve LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, or triglyceride levels in these patients (58155,95073). Whether L-carnitine reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with hyperlipidemia is unknown.
• Kidney failure. Intravenous, but not oral, L-carnitine is FDA-approved for the prevention and treatment of L-carnitine deficiency in patients with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis. Any other benefits with the use of L-carnitine in patients on hemodialysis are unclear. Details: Patients with kidney failure undergoing maintenance hemodialysis often experience L-carnitine deficiency, which can lead to lipid, red blood cell, cardiac muscle, and skeletal muscle abnormalities (26496). Use of intravenous L-carnitine for the prevention and treatment of L-carnitine deficiency in people with kidney failure who are undergoing hemodialysis is an FDA-approved indication for L-carnitine. L-carnitine 10-20 mg/kg is given as a slow (2-3 minute) bolus injection, with dose adjustments made based on subsequent pre-dialysis L-carnitine concentrations (3616). However, oral L-carnitine is not FDA-approved for this purpose. There is concern that long-term administration of high doses of oral L-carnitine may result in accumulation of toxic metabolites, including trimethylamine and trimethylamine-N-oxide, in patients with kidney failure (3616). Research in other areas are conflicting. Most clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine 0.7-3 grams or 10 mg/kg daily or administering L-carnitine 2-6 grams or 30-60 mg/kg weekly via intravenous infusion can improve cardiac function, intravenous fistula complications, red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and C-reactive protein levels in patients on hemodialysis (9790,26496,58257,58437,58842,59009,59178,111877). A meta-analysis of 18 clinical studies in adults with kidney-related anemia undergoing hemodialysis shows that receiving oral or intravenous L-carnitine reduces erythropoietin responsiveness and erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) requirement, but not hemoglobin level, when compared with placebo or conventional therapy, regardless of treatment duration or route of administration (107406). Despite an earlier meta-analysis suggesting that L-carnitine does not reduce the incidence of dialysis-related hypotension or muscle cramping (58511), a more recent meta-analysis shows that L-carnitine reduces the incidence of dialysis-related hypotension by 74% when compared with placebo (111878). However, sub-analyses suggest that only oral L-carnitine, and doses of over 4.2 grams weekly for at least 12 weeks, are effective for preventing hypotension (111878). A meta-analysis and some preliminary clinical research also show that muscle cramping is reduced by up to 78% when compared with controls (104176,111878). Additionally, observational research has found that administering at least 1 gram of L-carnitine per dialysis session for at least 10 sessions monthly is associated with a 10% to 20% decrease in the number of hospitalization days during the subsequent month (58409). However, L-carnitine may not be beneficial for improving other measures in people with kidney failure receiving dialysis. While some research shows that L-carnitine decreases lipoprotein(a) levels (44187), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels (26496,91723,107399), and total cholesterol levels (107399), most research shows that it does not improve serum lipid levels (9790,26496,44187,58257,58320,58842,58939,59009,59025,59031)(59036,59059,59080,90633,91723,107399). Additionally, while one small clinical trial shows that taking L-carnitine can improve performance on some exercise tests (104179), most research shows that L-carnitine does not improve respiratory function or exercise performance. The effect on quality of life is unclear (58154,58437,58472,58743,59031,90633,111867,111877).
• Male infertility. Oral L-carnitine, taken alone or in combination with acetyl-L-carnitine, may increase sperm motility in males with infertility, leading to a greater likelihood of pregnancy in female partners. Details: Although some clinical research has yielded conflicting results (58209,58588,59020,90627,111861), most clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine 1-3 grams daily in divided doses for up to 24 weeks, with or without acetyl-L-carnitine 1 gram daily, increases sperm count and motility, and improves sperm morphology, in males with infertility of various etiologies (12352,58167,58182,58194,58334,58469,58831,58849,59129,59189)(59190,101560,107394,111861,111459,111888,111890). However, it is unclear if taking L-carnitine increases the odds of pregnancy. One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials shows that taking L-carnitine and acetyl-L-carnitine in combination increases the odds of pregnancy by 3.7-fold over placebo. However most clinical research investigating the effect of L-carnitine alone or with acetyl L-carnitine on pregnancy rates disagrees (12352,58182,101560,111861,111459,111888). The number of studies investigating the effect of L-carnitine alone or with acetyl-L-carnitine on pregnancy rate is small and the duration of supplementation may be inadequate. Taking L-carnitine 1 gram and acetyl-L-carnitine 0.5 grams twice daily after taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for 2 months seems to increase sperm count and motility in males with abacterial prostatovesiculoepididymitis, an inflammation of the prostate gland, seminal vesicles, and epididymis (9791). Some studies have also evaluated L-carnitine in combination with other ingredients. One clinical trial in males with asthenospermia shows that taking L-carnitine 150 mg, acetyl-L-carnitine 50 mg, L-arginine 1660 mg, and Panax ginseng 200 mg daily for 3 months increases sperm motility and sexual satisfaction when compared with no treatment (32189). Another small clinical trial shows that taking this combination along with prulifloxacin 600 mg daily for 6 months improves sperm concentration and motility when compared with prulifloxacin alone in patients with chronic prostatitis due to Chlamydia trachomatis infection (59006). Other small and preliminary clinical studies have investigated the effects of a specific combination product providing L-carnitine 1 gram twice daily for 6 months, along with acetyl-L-carnitine, coenzyme Q10, selenium, zinc, vitamin C, folic acid, vitamin B12, and citric acid (Proxeed Plus). Taking this combination product has been shown to improve measures of sperm quality such as sperm count, sperm concentration, total motility, and progressive motility when compared to baseline. The effect on sperm volume and morphology is unclear. Most research has been conducted in patients with oligoasthenozoospermia, although some benefit has also been shown in patients with varicocele-related infertility, especially those with more severe varicocele (102017,107395,111296). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of comparator group. Also, it is unclear if these effects are due to L-carnitine, other ingredients, or the combination. The effect of L-carnitine in combination with other ingredients on pregnancy rate has also been examined. One meta-analysis of moderate-quality clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine in combination with micronutrients increases the odds of pregnancy by 3.5-fold over placebo or no treatment (111888).
• Myocarditis. Oral DL-carnitine may prevent myocarditis in children with diphtheria. Details: Myocarditis is a complication of diphtheria. Clinical research in children with diphtheria shows that taking DL-carnitine 100 mg/kg daily for 4 days reduces the risk of myocarditis and mortality when compared with no treatment (3620,3621).
• Valproic acid-induced toxicities. Although more well-designed research is needed to confirm these findings, oral and intravenous L-carnitine may improve neurologic and hepatic function and reduce ammonia levels in patients with these valproic acid-induced toxicities. Details: Valproic acid-induced toxicities are often associated with low plasma and tissue levels of L-carnitine. Preliminary clinical research and case reports in patients on valproic acid therapy who have neurologic or hepatic deterioration or hyperammonemia show that taking L-carnitine 50-100 mg/kg daily in divided doses or administering L-carnitine 150-500 mg/kg daily via intravenous infusion seems to improve neurologic and hepatic function and bring plasma ammonia levels within normal limits (1438,1914,1915,1916,1917,4523,5798,5799,95068). There is also some preliminary evidence that intravenous L-carnitine can prevent the development of severe valproic acid-induced hepatotoxicity when given to patients being treated for overdose and accidental ingestion of valproic acid (1438,4528,5798,5799), especially if treatment is initiated early (4528). Despite these results, most evidence consists of anecdotal individuals or small case series. A more recent retrospective cohort study suggests that treatment with an L-carnitine dosing regimen consisting of a 100 mg/kg intravenous loading dose followed by up to 3 grams daily in divided doses for 3 days or until ICU discharge does not enhance valproic acid elimination or prevent organ dysfunction when compared with patients not treated with L-carnitine (111869). Also, taking L-carnitine does not appear to reduce valproic acid-associated weight gain (58295). Well-designed clinical trials are still needed to determine the role of L-carnitine in the treatment or prevention of valproic acid toxicities.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Topical L-carnitine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with mild-to-moderate acne shows that applying a proprietary formulation containing L-carnitine, licochalcone, and 1,2-decanediol to the face twice daily for 8 weeks reduces the number of acne lesions and pustules and improves quality of life when compared to baseline. However, the improvements do not appear to be significant when compared with placebo (26493).
• Age-related fatigue. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may improve physical and mental fatigue associated with aging. Details: Two small clinical trials in elderly patients experiencing fatigue after slight physical activity shows that taking L-carnitine 2-4 grams daily for 1-6 months improves physical and mental fatigue, increases muscle mass, and decreases fat mass when compared with placebo (16109,16111).
• Aluminum phosphide poisoning. It is unclear if intravenous L-carnitine is beneficial in people with aluminum phosphide poisoning. Details: A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research in patients with aluminum phosphide poisoning shows that intravenous L-carnitine does not reduce the odds of mortality when compared with control groups receiving routine treatments only (111892). However, only 2 studies were included in the analysis and both studies may have been underpowered to detect differences.
• Alzheimer disease. Oral L-carnitine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease shows that taking L-carnitine tartrate 3.73 grams, in combination with serine, nicotinamide riboside, and N-acetyl cysteine, daily for 28 days and then twice daily for 56 days does not improve cognitive function when compared with taking placebo. However, in patients with the most severe symptoms, there was some modest improvement (110623). This study may have been underpowered to detect differences. Also, the effect of L-carnitine alone is unclear.
• Androgenic alopecia. It is unclear if topical L-carnitine is beneficial in people with androgenic alopecia. Details: One small clinical trial in individuals with androgenic alopecia shows that applying topical L-carnitine 2% solution to the scalp twice daily for 6 months significantly increases the number of terminal hair shafts on the scalp when compared with placebo (58390).
• Anorexia nervosa. Although there has been interest in using oral L-carnitine for anorexia nervosa, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose.
• Anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Oral and intravenous L-carnitine have only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with breast cancer undergoing doxorubicin treatment shows that taking a combination of L-carnitine and vitamin E over 4 21-day treatment cycles decreases the proportion of patients with cardiac events by 24.2% when compared with chemotherapy treatment only. There were also modest beneficial effects on some enzyme measures of cardiac health. Patients received L-carnitine 3 grams intravenously on the first day of each cycle followed by an oral intake of 300 mg 4 times daily for the remaining 20 days. Vitamin E 1800 mg daily was taken orally in 3 divided doses (111891).
• Athletic performance. Oral L-carnitine has been evaluated for its effect on athletic performance in several small and short-term clinical studies, with mixed results. Details: Maximal exercise in trained athletes has been associated with a decrease in plasma L-carnitine levels (3648,58583). Theoretically, restoring these levels with L-carnitine supplementation might have beneficial effects. However, clinical studies examining the use of L-carnitine for athletic performance have reported conflicting results. Some clinical studies show that taking L-carnitine 2 grams, either before exercise or daily for up to 6 weeks, enhances athletic performance and endurance and reduces post-exercise muscle pain in male athletes and healthy untrained males (58450,59182,59185), but other studies do not support these findings (1947,59128,59134). Additionally, although some studies show that taking L-carnitine 1-2 grams or 40 mg/kg before exercise or 4 grams daily for 2 weeks can decrease lactate accumulation and increase oxygen uptake, power output, and time to anabolic threshold during exercise (3649,3650,59061,59184,59186), other studies show no improvement in these outcomes (58471,58775,59033,59045,59069,59128). These discrepancies may be related to the small study sizes, short treatment durations, and variable dosing regimens.
• Atrial fibrillation. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial for preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery. Details: A very small clinical study in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement or valve-sparing aortic root replacement shows that receiving oral L-carnitine (L-Cartin FF, Otsuka Pharmaceutical) 1 gram three times daily, beginning 2 days prior to surgery and continuing for 7 days after surgery, is associated with a postoperative atrial fibrillation rate of 20%, compared with a rate of 60% in a historical age-matched control group not receiving L-carnitine (107408).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in children with ADHD. Details: One small crossover trial in children with ADHD shows that taking L-carnitine 50 mg/kg twice daily for 6 months improves parent and teacher assessments of behavior when compared with placebo (58166).
• Autism spectrum disorder. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may improve some symptoms of autism spectrum disorder. Details: Small clinical trials in children 3-16 years of age with autism spectrum disorder show that taking L-carnitine 50 mg/kg or 150 mg/kg daily for 8 to 12 weeks modestly improves overall symptoms of autism, especially lethargy, social isolation, hyperactivity, and irritability, when compared with taking placebo. However, there is inconsistency between studies with respect to rating scales used and specific endpoints showing improvement. In one study, children remained on any pre-existing medications; in the other two, all children were also taking risperidone (58981,111887,111900).
• Arrhythmia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may reduce the incidence of arrhythmias in patients with premature ventricular contractions. Details: Small clinical trials in patients with premature ventricular contractions show that taking L-carnitine 2 grams twice daily for 45 weeks or 2 grams three times daily for 2 weeks might reduce the incidence of arrhythmias when compared to baseline (59043,59120,59143).
• Asthenopia (eye strain). Oral L-carnitine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in videoterminal users with computer vision syndrome and without dry eye shows that taking a product containing L-carnitine 50 mg, along with zinc and extracts of elderberry, black currant, and eleuthero root (Meramirt CM) daily for 1 month modestly reduces severity of eye strain and sensitivity when compared with not taking this product (111295). It is unclear if these findings are due to L-carnitine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Oral L-carnitine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients in Iran with BPH shows that taking L-carnitine 1000 mg plus coenzyme Q10 daily in addition to finasteride 5 mg daily for 8 weeks modestly improves subjective assessment of sexual function when compared with placebo plus finasteride. There was no effect on prostate symptoms, prostate specific antigen levels, or quality of life (113226). It is unclear if these effects are due to L-carnitine, coenzyme Q10, or the combination.
• Beta-thalassemia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may improve symptoms and reduce complications of beta-thalassemia minor, intermedia, and major. Details: Several small clinical trials in children with beta-thalassemia major show that taking L-carnitine 50 mg/kg daily for 3-6 months might reduce pulmonary artery systolic pressure, increase cardiac output during exercise, and improve progression to puberty (58294,58502,58556). Clinical research in adults with beta-thalassemia intermedia shows that taking L-carnitine with hydroxyurea appears to increase hemoglobin and hematocrit and reduce left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, a measure of pulmonary hypertension (58679). In patients with beta-thalassemia major or intermedia aged 6 years and up, taking L-carnitine 50 mg/kg daily for 6 months normalized left ventricular dilatation and hypertrophy in 30% and 37% of patients, respectively, compared with only 10% in those taking placebo. Cardiac output was also improved, but there were no changes in blood parameters (101565). Clinical research in children with beta-thalassemia minor shows that taking L-carnitine 50 mg/kg daily, with or without folic acid 1 mg daily, for 3 months appears to reduce bone pain by 84% to 87% and increase the number of climbable stairs 3.1- to 5.2-fold when compared with baseline (90631).
• Cachexia. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may improve body composition and quality of life in patients with cancer-related cachexia. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with cancer-related cachexia shows that taking L-carnitine 4 grams daily for 12 weeks increases body mass index (BMI) when compared with placebo (59029). Other research shows that taking L-carnitine 4 grams daily with megestrol acetate, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and thalidomide for 5 months is more effective than any single product alone for increasing lean body mass in patients with cancer-related cachexia (23437). Additionally, taking L-carnitine 4 grams daily with megestrol acetate, celecoxib, and antioxidants for 4 months appears more effective than megestrol acetate alone for improving lean body mass, fatigue, and quality of life in these patients (59012).
• Cancer-related fatigue. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial for improving fatigue in patients with advanced cancer. Details: Some cancer patients have low blood levels of L-carnitine, which may reduce energy production and lead to fatigue. Some small clinical trials in patients with advanced cancer show that taking L-carnitine 3-4 grams daily for 7 days significantly improves some measures of fatigue when compared to baseline (16106,16110). However, other higher quality clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine 2-4 grams daily for 4-12 weeks is no more effective than placebo for improving fatigue in advanced cancer patients (26498,58523,59029).
• Celiac disease. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with celiac disease. Details: Some research shows that L-carnitine blood levels are low in patients with celiac disease. One small clinical trial in patients with celiac disease shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams daily for 6 months lowers some measures of fatigue when compared with placebo. However, L-carnitine does not significantly improve measures of depression or quality of life in these patients (16105).
• Chemotherapy-related fatigue. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with fatigue due to sunitinib therapy. Details: A small clinical study in adults with renal cell carcinoma who are experiencing fatigue associated with sunitinib treatment shows that taking L-carnitine 1500 mg daily for 2 weeks modestly improves fatigue severity when compared to baseline (100352). The validity of this finding is limited by the small study size and lack of a comparator group.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with CFS. Details: One small clinical study in adults with CFS shows that taking L-carnitine 1 gram three times daily for 2 months can improve some symptoms of CFS when compared to baseline (3630). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with COPD. Details: One small clinical study in adults with moderate to severe COPD shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams daily for 6 weeks improves exercise performance and walking tolerance when compared with placebo (58213).
• Cirrhosis. Preliminary research suggests that oral L-carnitine may be beneficial in patients with cirrhosis. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with cirrhosis who are receiving branched-chain amino acids supplements to improve nutritional status shows that taking L-carnitine 1 gram orally daily for 6 months, in addition to increasing exercise by 2000 steps per day, does not improve muscle volume, handgrip strength, or leg strength, but does reduce complaints of muscle cramping, when compared to baseline (102124). Another small, uncontrolled clinical trial in patients with cirrhosis shows that taking L-carnitine 1800 mg daily for 6 months does not improve Child-Pugh scores, but may improve quality of life, when compared to baseline (104177). The validity of these studies is limited by the lack of comparator groups. The effect of L-carnitine has also been examined retrospectively in patients with cirrhosis. One retrospective study in matched patients that had been admitted to hospital for cirrhosis suggests that taking L-carnitine for more than 30 days is associated with an increase in survival length by about 21 months compared with not taking L-carnitine. Overall, L-carnitine use was also associated with a 36% to 48% increase in the proportion of patients surviving 1-5 years, with the greatest effect in patients with modest to severe liver dysfunction. The median dose of L-carnitine was 1000 mg daily for at least 6 months is associated with a reduced loss of skeletal muscle compared with not taking L-carnitine (111860). The validity of these studies is limited by their retrospective design.
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial for improving cognitive function in healthy individuals. Details: Low-quality clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine 500 mg as a single dose or 250 mg twice daily for 3 days does not improve cognitive function or memory in otherwise healthy young adults when compared with placebo (58176,95070).
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with CHD. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with CHD shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams prior to exercise does not improve endurance when compared with placebo (58196). Another small clinical trial in patients with CHD shows that taking L-carnitine 1 gram daily for 12 weeks does not improve low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol, or apolipoprotein-B when compared with placebo; however, it does appear to increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and apolipoprotein A-1 levels in these patients (95071).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial for COVID-19 prevention or treatment. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients hospitalized with mild to moderate COVID-19 shows that taking L-carnitine 1 gram 3 times daily for 5 days does not reduce the incidence of fever or cough when compared with standard treatments only. However, all patients taking L-carnitine survived compared with 86% of those given standard treatment only. Also, there were improvements in oxygen saturation and inflammatory measures (111874). Other clinical research in patients with confirmed asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 shows that taking L-carnitine tartrate (Carnipure) 1 gram 3 times daily for 21 days does not prevent the development of severe lung symptoms when compared with taking placebo. However, in a sub-group of patients, lung lesion improvement was significantly better between days 7 and 14. In adults without COVID-19 but living with someone with confirmed disease, taking this product does not prevent COVID-19 when compared with taking placebo. However, the total number of confirmed illnesses in the population was low (111898).
• Critical illness (trauma). It is unclear if oral or nasogastric L-carnitine is beneficial for critical illness. Details: One small clinical trial in critically ill patients in the ICU shows that receiving L-carnitine (BSK, Zist Takhmir Co, Tehran-Iran) 3 grams daily via a nasogastric tube for 7 days modestly improves disease severity, organ function, inflammatory and other laboratory measures when compared with receiving placebo. Also, mortality rate was reduced by approximately 50%. There was no effect on the duration of hospital or ICU stay (111883,111884). However, another small clinical trial in critically ill patients following an acute ischemic stroke shows that oral or nasogastric L-carnitine tartrate 500 mg every 8 hours for 6 days does not affect the duration of mechanical ventilation or hospital or ICU stay, the severity of illness, or 28-day mortality rates, when compared with taking placebo. There was a modest beneficial effect on insulin resistance (111881). This study was small and may have been underpowered to detect differences.
• Diabetes. Oral L-carnitine may improve glycemic control in patients with diabetes, but it is unclear if these improvements are clinically meaningful. It is also unclear if L-carnitine can improve lipid profiles or weight loss in these patients. Details: While individual study results are mixed (58169,58189,58514,58793,90632,96922,101561), meta-analyses of available clinical research in mixed populations shows that taking L-carnitine 200 mg to 4 grams daily reduces fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels, and possibly insulin, and improves insulin resistance, when compared with taking placebo or a control diet, although the clinical significance of these improvements is unclear (102018,111875,111886). One meta-analysis shows that these benefits are generally specific to patients with high levels of fasting glucose, diabetes, or obesity, as well as studies investigating L-carnitine in doses of at least 2 grams daily for 12 weeks. However, a small number of studies included in this analysis investigated the effects of acetyl-L-carnitine (111875). Other research in obese patients with type 2 diabetes shows that, when taken with orlistat or sibutramine, L-carnitine 2 grams daily for 12 months decreases body weight and body mass index and improves glycemic control when compared with orlistat or sibutramine alone (58778,58830,58882). The effect of L-carnitine on lipids in people with diabetes is unclear. Some studies show significant reductions in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and/or lipoprotein(a) (58554,58647,58649,90632,101561,107397), while other studies show no improvement in lipid profiles (58169,58189).
• Dilated cardiomyopathy. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may improve ejection fraction in children with dilated cardiomyopathy and adults with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Details: Primary L-carnitine deficiency is a common cause of pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy. Additionally, patients with dilated cardiomyopathy of unknown etiology have been shown to have low cardiac levels of L-carnitine (59196,100351). Due to these findings, L-carnitine has been evaluated for the treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy in children and adults, but the small sizes of these studies and methodological limitations limit the reliability of the results. One small clinical study in children under 13 years of age with dilated cardiomyopathy shows that taking L-carnitine 50-100 mg/kg daily for 1 year in conjunction with standard care improves ejection fraction and reduces left atrial and ventricular diameters when compared with placebo and standard care (100351). The results of this study are limited by the small sample size, unclear etiology of dilated cardiomyopathy, and potential bias. Another small clinical study in children under 5 years of age with dilated cardiomyopathy and low serum levels of L-carnitine shows that taking L-carnitine 100 mg/kg daily for 3 months improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), cardiac output, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification when compared with baseline (59196). Further research is needed to clarify whether L-carnitine is beneficial for most children with dilated cardiomyopathy, or only those with carnitine deficiency. L-carnitine has also been evaluated in older adults. A meta-analysis of clinical studies in mostly older adults with dilated cardiomyopathy shows that addition of intravenous L-carnitine, alone or followed by oral L-carnitine, 1-6 grams daily to conventional therapy for a total of 10-28 days is associated with a 28% increased likelihood of overall efficacy, with improvements observed in both LVEF and cardiac output, when compared with conventional therapy alone (107405). The validity of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies, potential publication bias, and unclear reporting. A small individual clinical study in older adults with ischemic cardiomyopathy shows that taking oral L-carnitine daily for 2 months improves LVEF when compared with baseline (58150). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Dry eye. Topical L-carnitine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Evidence suggests that chronic use of eye drops containing benzalkonium chloride can cause tear film instability and lead to dry eye (90921). One small clinical trial in patients with glaucoma using eye drops containing benzalkonium chloride shows that using additional eye drops containing L-carnitine (1.017%), eledoisin (0.04%), taurine (0.49%), sodium hyaluronate (0.20 grams/100 mL), and vitamin E acetate (0.20 grams/100 mL) (Carnidrop Plus, Sigma-Tau) three times daily for 15 days reduces dry eye symptoms by approximately 50% when compared to baseline (90625). It is unclear if these findings are due to L-carnitine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Endometriosis. Although there has been interest in using oral L-carnitine for endometriosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose.
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine tartrate is beneficial for exercise recovery. Details: A small clinical study in healthy males and females participating in moderate physical activity at least 3 days weekly shows that taking a specific product (Carnipure, Lonza Consumer Health, Inc.) providing elemental L-carnitine 2 grams daily for 5 weeks improves perceived recovery and soreness as well as serum creatine kinase levels by 33% and 28%, respectively, when compared with placebo (107398).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may slightly reduce exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: Evidence from mostly small clinical trials, when considered alone or combined via meta-analysis, shows that taking L-carnitine 1-3 grams daily for around 3 weeks modestly reduces exercise-induced muscle soreness, especially in the period of 24-48 hours after exercise. Benefits may last up to 96 hours post-exercise. Levels of creatinine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, and myoglobin also appear to improve with L-carnitine supplementation, reflecting a reduction in muscle damage (58326,58709,59148,101567).
• Hepatic encephalopathy. Oral or intravenous L-carnitine may improve biochemical markers of disease severity in patients with hepatic encephalopathy, but L-carnitine does not seem to improve clinically important outcomes such as fatigue, quality of life, or overall disease severity. Details: A meta-analysis of nine studies in adults with hepatic encephalopathy shows that taking L-carnitine 1-6 grams daily orally or intravenously for up to 90 days increases albumin levels and decreases plasma levels of ammonia, bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine, but does not improve fatigue or quality of life, when compared with placebo (102122). A more recent clinical trial shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams daily for 24 weeks modestly improves bilirubin levels and some measures of cognitive and liver health, but not quality of life, when compared with taking placebo (111876). Two of the clinical trials included in this analysis also show that taking L-carnitine 2 grams daily for 60-90 days significantly improves cognitive function when compared with placebo in adults with hepatic encephalopathy (58174,58204). Another small clinical trial in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis shows that L-carnitine improves psychometric response to the ammonia tolerance test, suggesting that L-carnitine might be useful in the prevention of hepatic encephalopathy (58872). L-carnitine has also been evaluated in combination with rifaximin. A small clinical study in patients with overt hepatic encephalopathy shows that taking oral L-carnitine 1500 mg in combination with rifaximin 1200 mg three times daily for 12 weeks has no effect on the modified portal systemic encephalopathy index when compared with rifaximin alone. L-carnitine improved blood ammonia levels at 4 weeks, but not at 8 or 12 weeks (107410).
• Hepatitis-related fatigue. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with hepatitis-related fatigue. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with hepatitis C who are receiving interferon-alpha treatment shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams daily significantly reduces fatigue when compared with interferon-alpha alone. L-carnitine appears to reduce fatigue within the first 3 months of treatment, but not after 6 months (16104).
• Hepatitis B. Oral L-carnitine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with hepatitis B shows that taking a specific vitamin complex providing L-carnitine 2472 mg (Godex, Celltrion Pharm) in combination with entecavir 0.5 grams daily for 12 months normalizes alanine transaminase (ALT) levels in 95% and 100% of patients after 3 months and 12 months, respectively, compared to 59% and 86% of patients taking entecavir alone. However, the L-carnitine complex does not appear to improve aspartate transaminase (AST) levels or reduce hepatitis B virus titers (91724). It is unclear if these findings are due to L-carnitine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Hepatitis C. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may improve response to treatment and markers of liver function in patients with hepatitis C. Details: Two small clinical trials in patients with chronic hepatitis C show that taking L-carnitine 2 grams once or twice daily along with interferon-alpha and ribavirin for 12 months modestly improves response to treatment, increases hemoglobin and red blood cell counts, reduces aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, and reduces steatosis when compared with interferon-alpha and ribavirin treatment alone (58405,59010).
• HIV/AIDS. Although there has been interest in using intravenous L-carnitine to increase CD4 counts in patients with HIV/AIDS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial for reducing systolic or diastolic blood pressure. Details: A meta-analysis of low-quality clinical studies in adults, both healthy and with underlying health conditions,shows that taking oral L-carnitine 0.5 to 3 grams daily for 4 to 52 weeks does not reduce systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) when compared with control(115352). The validity of this study is limited by heterogenous methods between clinical trials, including population, dose, and outcome measurements.
• Hyperthyroidism. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with hyperthyroidism. Details: One small clinical trial in females with hyperthyroidism shows that taking L-carnitine 2-4 grams daily for 2-6 months seems to significantly improve symptoms associated with hyperthyroidism, such as palpitations, nervousness, tremors, and asthenia, when compared with placebo (8047).
• Hypertriglyceridemia. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Details: Small clinical studies in patients with hypertriglyceridemia show that taking L-carnitine 1 gram daily for 12 weeks does not reduce triglyceride levels when compared with placebo (59028,59244).
• Hypothyroidism. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial for improving fatigue in patients with hypothyroidism. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with secondary hypothyroidism shows that taking L-carnitine (Ildong Pharmaceutical Co.) 990 mg twice daily for 12 weeks in addition to adequate doses of levothyroxine does not reduce overall fatigue severity when compared with placebo. However, taking L-carnitine might improve physical and mental fatigue in patients with secondary hypothyroidism that are less than 50 years of age. L-carnitine might also improve mental fatigue in patients that underwent thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer (95069).
• Infertility. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial for female infertility. Details: One uncontrolled clinical trial in females who had failed to conceive in previous in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles shows that taking L-carnitine (L-CAR Basic Premium; AA Project Co. ltd.) 1000 mg daily for an average of 82 days does not improve the number of retrieved oocytes or fertilization rates when compared with previous IVF cycles. However, embryo quality at days 3 and 5 of insemination was improved, resulting in an increase in the rate of transferable embryos from 60% in previous cycles to 67%, morphologically good-quality embryos from around 46% to 54%, and blastocysts from around 11% to 21%. The most evidence of benefit was seen in those taking L-carnitine for the shortest time length of 7-44 days (96933).
• Intermittent claudication. Although there has been interest in using oral L-carnitine for intermittent claudication, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose.
• Liver disease. Small clinical studies suggest that oral L-carnitine may modestly improve some, but not all, lipid parameters in adults with liver disease. Details: A meta-analysis of six small, low-quality clinical trials in patients with hepatitis C, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) shows that taking L-carnitine moderately reduces total cholesterol and slightly reduces triglyceride levels, but does not improve low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, when compared with control. Studies evaluating L-carnitine doses of 2 grams daily or less and study durations of 24 months or longer showed the largest effect on lipid levels (104178). Another meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research in patients with hepatitis B or C, hepatic encephalopathy, NASH, or NAFLD shows that taking L-carnitine modestly reduces levels if aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (AST) when compared with taking placebo or no L-carnitine. Some of the studies included in this analysis used acetyl-L-carnitine. However, a meta-analysis of two studies investigating the effect of carnitine orotate shows that taking this compound increases the proportion of patients with normal ALT levels by 4.6 fold (111871).
• Liver transplant. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients awaiting a liver transplant. Details: One small clinical trial shows that taking L-carnitine 500 mg three times daily while awaiting a liver transplant does not reduce the incidence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) or non-function (PNF) when compared with placebo. However, survival one month after surgery was 97% in those taking L-carnitine, compared with 74% in those taking placebo (101562). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference in the incidences of PGD and PNF between groups.
• Low birth weight. It is unclear if oral or intravenous L-carnitine is effective for increasing body weight in preterm infants. Several small clinical studies show conflicting results. Details: Several very small clinical trials in preterm infants receiving total parenteral nutrition show that administering L-carnitine orally at a dose of 13-60 mcmol/kg or intravenously at a dose of 10 mg/kg or 50-100 mcmol/kg daily can improve fat utilization and weight gain when compared with control (3633,3634,3635,3636,3637,58902,59097). However, other small clinical studies show that supplementation with L-carnitine does not significantly increase body weight in preterm infants (58190,58800,59161). The reasons for the discrepant findings are unclear, but due to small study size, some of the studies may have been underpowered to detect significant differences between groups.
• Lyme disease. Although there has been interest in using oral L-carnitine for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose.
• Malnutrition. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in children with severe malnutrition. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study conducted in Bangladesh in children aged 9 to 24 months hospitalized with severe acute malnutrition shows that administering oral L-carnitine syrup 100 mg/kg daily for 15 days in addition to standard care does not improve rates of weight gain or reduce durations of hospital stays when compared with placebo (115351).
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral or intravenous L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with metabolic syndrome. Details: One very small clinical trial in patients with metabolic syndrome undergoing 2 days of moderate calorie restriction followed by a 5-day modified fasting period shows that intravenous L-carnitine 2 grams twice daily for 7 days increases weight loss by 1.4 kg and decreases waist circumference by 3.3 cm when compared with intravenous saline. Perceived hunger scores, physical fatigue, and insulin levels were also improved. However, there were no effects on blood pressure (90634). Other clinical research in patients with metabolic syndrome and a total carotid plaque volume of at least 50 mm³ shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams daily for 6 months does not affect the progression of carotid plaque volume when compared with taking placebo. Also, taking L-carnitine increased the progression of carotid plaque stenosis by 9.3%, as well as levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, in this population (111879).
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with migraine headaches. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with migraines shows that taking L-carnitine 500 mg daily, with or without magnesium oxide, for 12 weeks does not significantly reduce migraine frequency or severity when compared with a control (59030). However, another small preliminary clinical trial in children with episodic migraines shows that taking L-carnitine 25 mg per kg twice daily for 12 weeks prophylactically is as effective as taking propranolol 1 mg/kg once daily for reducing the frequency, severity, and duration of migraine headaches (111870). These studies were small and may have been underpowered to detect differences between groups.
• Muscle cramps. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with muscle cramps. Details: One small, uncontrolled clinical trial in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking L-carnitine 300 mg twice daily for 4 months decreases the monthly frequency of muscle cramps from around 4 cramps per month at baseline to around 1 cramp per month after treatment. When compared with baseline, pain was also reduced by about 1 point on a 5-point scale (96922). However, the lack of a placebo control group limits the validity of these findings.
• Multiple sclerosis-related fatigue. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with multiple sclerosis-related fatigue. Details: Some patients with multiple sclerosis have low blood levels of L-carnitine. Additionally, immunosuppressive therapy for multiple sclerosis can cause fatigue. One small, open-label clinical trial in patients with multiple sclerosis receiving immunosuppressive therapy and with low L-carnitine levels shows that taking L-carnitine 3-6 grams daily decreases some measures of fatigue when compared with no treatment (16107).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). It is unclear if oral or intravenous L-carnitine is beneficial in patients who have experienced an MI. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine orally or intravenously after MI reduces premature ventricular beats (58172,59044), improves myocardial viability (59248) and left ventricular function (3628), and reduces mortality (3627,3629,59037). However, other studies show no change in left ventricular functioning (58148) or mortality after taking L-carnitine (3628,58225,90630). The reasons for these discrepant findings are unclear, but may be due to differences in the dosing regimens and length of follow-up. Oral L-carnitine doses have ranged from 2-4 grams daily for up to 12 months (3627,3629,59248). Intravenous L-carnitine has been dosed at 5 grams within the first 36 hours after an MI followed by 3 grams twice daily on days 3-7 (58172), 100 mg/kg every 12 hours for 36 hours (59044), or 9 grams daily for 5 days followed by oral L-carnitine 6 grams daily for 12 months (3628).
• Narcolepsy. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with narcolepsy. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with narcolepsy shows that taking L-carnitine 340 mg in the morning and 170 mg in the evening for 8 weeks reduces dozing off time during the day by about 9 minutes when compared with placebo. However, the number of naps needed, quality of life, and sleepiness are not affected (90624).
• Neonatal apnea. It is unclear if intravenous L-carnitine is beneficial for preventing neonatal apnea in premature infants. Details: One small clinical trial in premature infants shows that adding L-carnitine 30 mg/kg daily to total parenteral nutrition or oral feeds does not affect ventilator requirements or reduce the incidence of apnea when compared with placebo (58163).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in children and adults with NAFLD. Details: One small clinical study in adults with NAFLD shows that taking L-carnitine 600 mg daily for 3 months improves markers of liver function when compared with baseline. No improvements in liver function markers were reported in patients in the control group; however, no statistical comparisons were conducted between groups (58808). A small clinical study in children aged 5-15 years with NAFLD receiving vitamin E shows that taking L-carnitine 25 mg/kg twice daily (maximum of 500 mg twice daily) for 3 months has no effect on aminotransferase concentrations or sonographic grades of fatty liver when compared with placebo (107401).
• Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with NASH. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with NASH shows that taking L-carnitine 1 gram after breakfast and 1 gram after dinner daily along with following a specific diet improves markers of liver function when compared with diet alone (58715). Another small clinical trial in patients with obesity and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis taking simvastatin 20 mg daily and following a hypocaloric diet shows that taking L-carnitine 10 mL twice daily for 90 days modestly reduces BMI, and improves liver health, lipid, and glycemic indices, when compared with taking a product described as essential phospholipids (111893).
• Obesity. Oral L-carnitine seems to have a small effect on weight loss in overweight or obese individuals when taken for up to 6 months, but some conflicting results exist. Doses of 2 grams daily seem to offer the most benefit. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical trials show that taking L-carnitine 250 mg to 4 grams daily reduces weight and body mass index (BMI) by a small amount when compared with a control group not taking L-carnitine (95074,101563,101564). Subgroup analyses show that L-carnitine only reduces BMI and weight in overweight or obese patients. Taking L-carnitine did not affect weight or BMI in patients with a BMI of up to 25 kg/m2 or in patients undergoing hemodialysis (101563,101564). Another subgroup analysis shows that the largest benefit occurs at a dose of 2 grams daily (101564). In patients with obesity and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis taking simvastatin 20 mg daily and following a hypocaloric diet, one clinical trial shows that taking L-carnitine 10 mL twice daily for 90 days modestly reduces BMI, and improves liver health, lipid, and glycemic indices, when compared with taking a product described as essential phospholipids (111893). However, conflicting results exist. One subgroup analysis in overweight or obese individuals shows that there is no effect on BMI when L-carnitine is taken for 24 weeks or more (101563). One meta-analysis of two small clinical trials in patients with overweight or obesity shows that taking L-carnitine is no more effective than lifestyle modification for reducing body weight (111866). Also, some clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine does not reduce body weight in obese females. Doses used in these studies include L-carnitine 1 gram daily for 12 weeks or 2 grams twice daily for 8 weeks along with exercise (58151,111872). The effect of L-carnitine on cardiovascular risk has also been examined in patients with obesity. One small clinical trial shows that taking L-carnitine 1 gram daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces the lipid accumulation index, based on waist circumference and blood triglyceride levels, when compared with taking placebo. However, there was no effect on other cardiovascular risk indices based on ratios of triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and/or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels (111872). L-carnitine has also been evaluated in combination with weight loss medications. Clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams daily along with orlistat 360 mg daily or sibutramine 10 mg daily for 1 year decreases body weight and BMI when compared with orlistat or sibutramine alone in obese adults with type 2 diabetes (58778,58830,58882).
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Details: A small clinical study in females with knee osteoarthritis and overweight or obesity who are on a low-calorie diet shows that taking L-carnitine 1 gram daily for 12 weeks does not improve pain, stiffness, or physical function when compared with placebo (107403).
• Pemphigus. Although there has been interest in using oral L-carnitine for glucocorticoid-induced muscle wasting in patients with pemphigus, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose.
• Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with PAD. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with PAD shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams twice daily for 3 weeks may improve walking distances in people with PAD (3631). However, another small clinical trial in patients with PAD or coronary heart disease shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams two hours before exercise does not improve endurance (58196). Also, adding L-carnitine 1 gram twice daily to cilostazol therapy for 180 days does not appear to confer additional benefit in this patient population (59023).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial for improving pregnancy rates or cardiovascular risk in people with PCOS. The effect of L-carnitine on body composition has promising results. Details: Clinical research shows that adding L-carnitine 3 grams daily for 3 months to standard clomiphene plus metformin therapy improves menstrual regularity by 20%, ovulation rate by 24%, and pregnancy rate by 21% when compared with placebo (102123). Preliminary clinical research in patients with PCOS who are resistant to both clomiphene and human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams twice daily from day 3 of clomiphene treatment until HCG injection results in the presence of a dominant follicle in 64% of cycles and pregnancy in 20% of cycles (96936). However, L-carnitine may not be beneficial in combination with assisted reproductive technology (ART), including in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Two small clinical studies in patients with PCOS receiving ART in combination with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol shows that adding L-carnitine 3000 mg daily starting on the second day of menstruation and continuing until the day of oocyte triggering or embryo transfer does not improve rates of oocyte maturity or retrieval, implantation, or pregnancy when compared with control (107409,115353). The effect of L-carnitine has also been examined on anthropometric and cardiovascular risk indices in patients with PCOS. One small clinical study shows that taking L-carnitine 250 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces body weight by 2.8 kg, body mass index (BMI) by 1.2 kg/m2, waist circumference by 1.7 cm, and hip circumference by 2.2 cm when compared with placebo (96935). A meta-analysis of this and other small studies also shows that L-carnitine modestly reduces BMI when compared with placebo in patients with PCOS (111873). Although several studies also show improvements in markers of glycemic control and insulin sensitivity, most research does not support beneficial effects on lipid levels, cardiovascular risk, or liver fat content (96935,107402,107404,115353).
• Rett syndrome. It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with Rett syndrome. Details: Two small clinical studies in children with Rett syndrome show that taking L-carnitine 100 mg/kg daily in two or three divided doses for up to 6 months modestly improves well-being, motor skills, sleep efficiency, and communication skills when compared with control or placebo (1433,58161).
• Sarcopenia. Oral L-carnitine may be beneficial for preventing sarcopenia in adults over 75 years of age, but not in healthy older females. Details: One small clinical trial in healthy, active, older females aged 65-70 years shows that taking L-carnitine, as L-carnitine-l-tartrate 1500 mg, daily for 24 weeks does not improve muscle strength or muscle mass when compared with placebo (96930). An additional preliminary clinical trial in females aged 60-75 years taking part in a twice weekly resistance exercise program shows that taking L-carnitine tartrate 1 gram daily with L-leucine 3 grams daily for 24 weeks does not improve muscle strength or volume when compared with taking L-leucine 4 grams daily or no supplementation (111880). These studies were small and may have been underpowered to detect differences. In contrast, in weaker adults 75 years of age and older, taking L-carnitine 2-4 grams daily for 1-6 months increases muscle mass by approximately 2-4 kg when compared with placebo (16109,16111).
• Sepsis. Small clinical studies suggest that intravenous L-carnitine may not reduce mortality in patients with sepsis, although patients with more severe sepsis may see some benefit. Details: Meta-analyses of generally low-quality small clinical trials in patients with sepsis shows that intravenous administration of L-carnitine, 2-6 grams as a bolus followed by a 4-12 gram infusion, does not reduce the risk of 28-day or 1-year mortality when compared with placebo (104180,111868). However, in a subgroup analysis of patients with more severe sepsis, classified as those with a sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA) of greater than 12, the risk of 1-year mortality was reduced by 32% when compared with placebo (104180).
• Spinal muscular atrophy. Although there has been interest in using oral L-carnitine for spinal muscular atrophy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose.
• Theophylline-induced cardiac toxicity. It is unclear if intravenous L-carnitine is beneficial in patients with theophylline-induced cardiac toxicity. Details: One small clinical trial shows that intravenous administration of L-carnitine 100 mg/kg over 30-60 minutes followed by 50 mg/kg every 8 hours along with intravenous propranolol within 24 hours of theophylline intoxication improves symptoms associated with theophylline-induced cardiac toxicity when given along with standard treatment. This combination led to greater improvements than either agent used alone. These included improvements in serum theophylline levels, heart rate, arrhythmia, mean arterial pressure, and duration of hospital stay. When L-carnitine was used without propranolol, only respiratory rate and theophylline levels over 24 hours were improved to a greater extent than with standard treatment alone (101566).
• Toxin-induced liver damage. Small clinical studies have evaluated oral and intravenous L-carnitine for the management of liver damage caused by different classes of drugs, including antimycobacterial antibiotics and asparaginase-based agents, with promising results. Details: The antimycobacterial antibiotics used to treat tuberculosis, including isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide, have been associated with hepatotoxicity (90922). Clinical research shows that taking L-carnitine 2 grams in two divided doses daily for 4 weeks along with a standard treatment regimen for tuberculosis reduces the percentage of treatment-naïve patients with drug-induced hepatotoxicity by almost half when compared with placebo (26499). The asparaginase-based medications have also been associated with hepatotoxicity. Two case series of children with hyperbilirubinemia caused by treatment with L-asparaginase or pegaspargase show that administering intravenous L-carnitine 50-100 mg/kg daily improves bilirubin levels (100353,100354). One case series also suggests that taking oral L-carnitine 50-100 mg/kg daily can help to prevent hyperbilirubinemia in patients with a history of asparaginase-induced hepatotoxicity (100353).
• Traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although there has been interest in using oral L-carnitine for TBI, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose.
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). It is unclear if oral L-carnitine is beneficial in children with UTIs. Details: One small clinical trial in children 6 months to 10 years of age shows that taking L-carnitine 50 mg/kg daily as a syrup along with antibiotics for 7 days prevents renal scarring associated with acute pyelonephritis. Kidney damage was resolved in 50% of children taking L-carnitine, compared with 13% of children taking placebo. There were no differences in urine cultures between groups (101568).
• Venous leg ulcers. Although there has been interest in using oral L-carnitine for venous leg ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L-carnitine for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate L-carnitine for these uses.

(Read more about L-CARNITINE)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Dyslipidemia. Niacin prescription products, in doses of 500 mg or greater, are FDA-approved for primary hyperlipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia. Niacin dietary supplements are generally available in lower doses and have not been shown to improve lipid levels. Details: Prescription niacin is not routinely recommended as second-line therapy for patients who primarily need to decrease low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. This is due to results from clinical trials showing no effect on cardiovascular related events or mortality (93346,93354,96208,96211,97308,97477,97336). However, niacin might be considered for patients with mixed hyperlipidemia or patients who need to increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and lower triglycerides. Niacin might also be effective for isolated hypoalphalipoproteinemia (4817). The most pronounced increases in HDL and decreases in triglycerides occur at 1-1.5 grams daily, and the greatest LDL reduction occurs at 2-3 grams daily. Niacin reduces LDL cholesterol by up to 25%, compared with up to a 55% reduction with statins. High-dose niacin can also decrease triglycerides by 20% to 50%, increase HDL by 13% to 35%, decrease apolipoprotein B levels by 2% to 20%, and decrease lipoprotein(a) levels by 23% (4818,4886,4887,4888,4889,4890,12033,25567,93347,96213). The effects of higher dose extended-release niacin on LDL cholesterol and triglycerides appear to be greater in females than males (25565). Experts recommend maximizing statins first because they have the best evidence for improving cardiovascular outcomes (97477,97336,97337). However, if patients cannot reach their LDL goal with a statin alone or if they cannot tolerate a statin, niacin might be combined with other cholesterol-lowering drugs when diet and single-drug therapy are not adequately effective (8545,25566,93351,94191,97337). Adding low-dose niacin, 50 mg daily, to statin therapy has no additional benefit on lipid levels (8546). Population research in adults without dyslipidemia has also found that higher dietary intake of niacin for 3-10 years is associated with a 29% lower risk of developing dyslipidemia when compared with low dietary niacin intake (110493).
• Pellagra. Oral niacin is FDA-approved for the prevention and treatment of pellagra. Details: Population research has found that low consumption of niacin is associated with an increased risk of developing pellagra (25903). Taking niacin 500-1000 mg daily can resolve symptoms of pellagra within a week of treatment initiation (25904). However, niacinamide is sometimes preferred for this indication because it lacks the vasodilating effects of niacin (15,6243).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• HIV/AIDS-related dyslipidemia. Oral niacin seems to improve lipid levels in patients with dyslipidemia due to HIV/AIDs. Details: Small clinical trials in HIV patients with dyslipidemia associated with antiretroviral therapy shows that taking extended-release niacin (Niaspan, Abbott Laboratories) titrated up to 2 grams daily for 14-48 weeks improves total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride levels when compared to baseline (25570,25902). Other preliminary clinical research in this population shows that taking extended-release niacin (Niaspan, Abbott Laboratories) titrated to 2 grams daily for up to 2 years improves HDL cholesterol levels, but not total cholesterol or triglyceride levels, when compared with no treatment (25569).
• Metabolic syndrome. Oral niacin seems to improve lipid levels in patients with metabolic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking niacin (Niaspan, Abbott Laboratories) 2 grams daily orally for 16 weeks reduces triglyceride levels by 39 mg/dL and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by 5 mg/dL when compared to baseline in patients with metabolic syndrome. These improvements are significant when compared with placebo and are further increased when niacin is taken along with prescription omega-3 ethyl esters (Lovaza, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals) 4 grams daily orally (93353). However, niacin does not seem to improve postprandial glucose levels in patients with metabolic syndrome (97333).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral niacin does not seem to reduce cardiovascular-related events in patients with or without CVD. Details: Overall, niacin is not recommended for primary or secondary prevention of CVD. Most clinical trials and meta-analyses conducted prior to 2011 showed a reduction in cardiovascular-related events, cardiovascular-related mortality, and all-cause mortality in patients taking niacin alone or in combination with a statin or clofibrate for primary or secondary prevention of CVD (4847,7388,25095,25911,25912,93349). However, recent meta-analyses of these studies and additional moderate-to-high quality research conducted in over 39,000 patients show no effect of niacin on cardiovascular-related events, cardiovascular-related mortality, or overall mortality (93346,93354,96208,96211,97308). Additionally, one meta-analysis shows that patients taking niacin are twice as likely to report side effects when compared with placebo (96211). Furthermore, an analysis of blood from adults at high cardiovascular risk suggests that higher levels of circulating niacin terminal metabolites are associated with greater risk of major adverse cardiovascular events independent of traditional risk factors (113554).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial for reducing Alzheimer disease risk. Details: Observational research has found that consuming higher amounts of niacin (17-45 mg daily) from food and supplements is associated with a slower cognitive decline and a lower risk of developing Alzheimer disease when compared with people who consume less niacin (14 mg daily) (12077). It is not known if the risk of Alzheimer disease is reduced by taking a stand-alone niacin supplement.
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral niacin prevents atherosclerosis progression. Details: Preliminary clinical studies show that taking niacin orally, in combination with colestipol for up to 2 years, might modestly reduce progression of atherosclerosis as measured by coronary lesions and carotid arterial intima-media thickness in high-risk males with existing coronary atherosclerosis (25906,25909,25910). However, niacin does not seem to be better than statins. One clinical study in adults with atherosclerosis and peripheral arterial disease shows that taking extended-release niacin 1500 mg, simvastatin 40 mg, and ezetimibe 10 mg daily for 2 years does not reduce atherosclerosis of the superficial femoral artery when compared with simvastatin alone (96208). Niacin has also not been shown to prevent cardiovascular events or mortality (93346,93354,96208,96211,97308).
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral niacin improves athletic performance. Details: Preliminary clinical research in untrained adult males shows that taking niacin 1000 mg orally once before a cycling test does not improve power, respiratory exchange ratio, or time to exhaustion when compared with placebo. In addition, these measures were significantly worse when compared with taking caffeine 5 mg/kg orally as a single dose (107942). Clinical research in untrained males also shows that taking a supplement containing niacin 40 mg, caffeine 400 mg, capsicum extract 66.7 mg, and black pepper extract 10 mg prior to exercising does not improve strength, time to exhaustion, or maximal oxygen consumption when compared with placebo (37873).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although there is interest in using oral niacin for ADHD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacin for this condition.
• Cancer. It is unclear if dietary niacin is beneficial for cancer. Details: Population research in adults with cancer has found that high dietary niacin intake is associated with 49% and 27% lower risk of cancer-related mortality and all-cause mortality when compared with low dietary niacin intake. The same study also found that taking niacin supplements is associated with a lower risk of cancer-related mortality, but not all-cause mortality when compared with not taking niacin supplements (110496).
• Cataracts. It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial for preventing cataracts. Details: Population research has found that high dietary intake of niacin is associated with a reduced risk of nuclear cataracts (6378). However, there is no reliable evidence that niacin supplements reduce the risk of cataracts.
• Cholera. It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial for cholera. Details: One small clinical study in adults with severe cholera shows that taking 1-2 grams niacin orally reduces fluid loss in the stool by 31% to 47% in the first 16 hours when compared with control. The 2 gram dose seemed to result in a greater reduction in fluid loss than the 1 gram dose (4868).
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial in patients with ED and dyslipidemia. Details: Clinical research in patients with erectile dysfunction and dyslipidemia shows that taking extended-release niacin (Niaspan, Abbott Laboratories) titrated to 1.5 grams nightly for a total of 12 weeks significantly improves penetration frequency and the maintenance of an erection after penetration when compared to baseline (25913). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Glaucoma. It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial for preventing or treating glaucoma. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of niacin is associated with a lower odds of having glaucoma. However, this association was not consistently present when adjusting for confounders. The effects of niacin supplementation on glaucoma have not been evaluated (107942).
• Hyperphosphatemia. It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial for preventing high levels of phosphorus in the blood. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients on maintenance dialysis who are no longer using phosphate binders shows that taking niacin 375-750 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces serum phosphorus levels by 2.1 mg/dL, increases calcium levels by 0.4 mg/dL, and decreases serum alkaline phosphatase when compared with baseline (25914). However, clinical research in hemodialysis patients with inadequate phosphate control despite using standard phosphate-binding therapy shows that taking niacin at the maximum tolerated dose, up to 1000 mg daily, for 12 weeks, does not decrease serum phosphate levels when compared with placebo (93341). It is possible that this latter study was too small to observe between-group differences in changes in serum phosphate levels.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if dietary niacin is beneficial for preventing hypertension. Details: Observational research in Chinese adults found a J-shaped association between dietary niacin intake and development of hypertension, with the lowest risk occurring in those with a daily dietary niacin intake of 14.3-16.7 mg (104934).
• Meniere disease. Although there is interest in using oral niacin for Meniere disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacin for this condition.
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if dietary niacin is beneficial for preventing migraine headaches. Details: Population research in adults has found that high dietary intake of niacin is associated with a 28% lower likelihood of having migraine headaches when compared with low dietary intake of niacin (110495). However, the effect of niacin supplementation on migraines has not been studied.
• Motion sickness. Although there is interest in using oral niacin for motion sickness, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacin for this purpose.
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial for improving Parkinson disease symptoms. Details: Low-quality clinical research in adults with Parkinson disease shows that taking slow-release niacin 250 mg orally daily for 12 months improves Parkinson disease motor scores and fatigue scores by 17% and 26%, respectively, when compared with baseline (107944). However, higher quality clinical research shows that taking niacin 250 mg orally daily for 6 months does not improve Parkinson disease motor scores when compared with placebo (107943).
• Retinal vein occlusion. It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial for improving retinal vein occlusion symptoms. Details: A small case series in patients with chronic retinal vein occlusion shows that taking niacin titrated to 500 mg three times daily for 1 year is associated with reduced central macular thickness and improved visual acuity in over 50% of patients when compared with a control group. The addition of prednisolone eye drops does not alter the outcomes of those taking niacin (96212). The validity of this finding is limited due to the retrospective nature of this study.
• Sickle cell disease. It is unclear if oral niacin is beneficial for improving lipid levels in patients with sickle cell disease. Details: A small clinical study in patients with sickle cell disease shows that taking extended-release niacin titrated to 1.5 grams daily for 12 weeks does not improve vascular function or increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) or apolipoprotein A-I cholesterol levels when compared with placebo (96209).
• Schizophrenia. Although there is interest in using oral niacin for schizophrenia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacin for this condition.
• Vertigo. Although there is interest in using oral niacin for vertigo, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacin for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate niacin for these uses.

(Read more about NIACIN)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Altitude sickness. It is unclear if oral rhodiola is beneficial for altitude sickness. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking rhodiola 447 mg four times daily for 7 days does not improve blood oxygenation or markers of oxidative stress when compared with placebo in subjects exposed to simulated high-altitude conditions (25402).
• Anthracycline cardiotoxicity. It is unclear if oral rhodiola is beneficial for epirubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Details: Preliminary clinical research in breast cancer patients shows that taking salidroside, a constituent of rhodiola, 600 mg daily, beginning one week prior to chemotherapy and continuing throughout chemotherapy administration, reduces epirubicin-induced early left ventricular regional systolic dysfunction when compared with placebo (90434).
• Anxiety. It is unclear if oral rhodiola is beneficial for anxiety. Details: Preliminary clinical research in college students with anxiety shows that taking a specific dried rhodiola extract (Vitango, Schwabe Pharma) 200 mg twice daily for 14 days modestly reduces reported levels of anxiety, anger, confusion, negative mood, and stress when compared with a control group. However, rhodiola extract does not seem to improve cognition (96462).
• Arrhythmia. Although there has been interest in using oral rhodiola for arrhythmia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of rhodiola for this condition.
• Athletic performance. The evidence related to the use of rhodiola for athletic performance is mixed, although specific standardized extracts might be beneficial for certain performance endpoints. Details: The available evidence for rhodiola in athletic performance includes small clinical trials in recreationally active or trained athletes. Trials using rhodiola extracts standardized to 3% rosavins and 1% salidroside (eg. Finzelberg, GmbH) show that taking 3 mg/kg, 200 mg, or 500 mg prior to exercise testing, either as a single dose or with a 3-day lead-in dose, modestly improves performance endpoints on a cycle ergometer. Improved endpoints included time to exhaustion, peak oxygen use, time to completion, perceived exhaustion, anaerobic capacity, and power (13109,90432,100168). However, in trials in which rhodiola was not taken the morning of testing, or when performance endpoints included forearm endurance or marathon time and recovery, rhodiola 170 mg to 1500 mg daily did not affect perceived exertion, time to exhaustion, or peak oxygen use (15574,19284,90433). A small crossover trial shows that taking 500 mg of rhodiola extract, standardized to 3% rosavins and 1% salidroside, three times daily for 3 days followed by 500 mg 30-minutes before exercise testing increases bench press velocity but decreases bench press repetition volume when compared with placebo (110543). Furthermore, limited evidence suggests that rhodiola extract does not affect muscle strength, speed of limb movement, reaction times, or attention span (13109) but might reduce plasma creatine kinase levels (19284). Also, while some evidence suggests that rhodiola extract can reduce blood lactate levels (19284), other research shows that it increases blood lactate levels after resistance training to a greater degree than placebo (110543). In general, it appears that acute doses of rhodiola may improve specific physical performance parameters, but neither acute nor chronic doses appear to notably improve muscle function. Some research has also assessed rhodiola when used in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical study in trained male cyclists shows that taking a specific combination product (Optygen, First Endurance) containing rhodiola 600 mg (standardized to 3% rosavin and 2.5% salidroside) plus cordyceps 2000 mg (standardized to 7% cordycepic acid), daily for 6 days followed by a half-dose daily for 7 days does not improve time to exhaustion or muscle tissue oxygen saturation when compared with placebo (15573). Additionally, a small crossover study in healthy, recreationally active adult males shows that taking a 30:70 blend of rhodiola and maral root extracts at a dose of 350 mg or 175 mg, ninety minutes prior to isokinetic leg strength exercises, does not influence fatigability, performance variables, or affective responses when compared with placebo (105855).
• Bladder cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral rhodiola for bladder cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of rhodiola for this condition.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there has been interest in using oral rhodiola for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of rhodiola for this condition.
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Oral rhodiola extract has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults a with confirmed history of COVID-19 infection and at least 3 of 9 long COVID-19 symptoms for at least 30 days, but no longer than 3 months, after discharge shows that taking a specific combination product (ADAPT-232/Chisan, Swedish Herbal Institute), containing rhodiola extract 90 mg, schisandra extract 300 mg, and eleuthero extract 78 mg, twice daily for 14 days increases walking duration by around 13 minutes but does not reduce the duration of cough, fatigue, headache, pain, or other respiratory problems when compared with placebo (109635). It is unclear if these findings are due to rhodiola, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral rhodiola is beneficial for depression. Details: Clinical practice guidelines from the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) state that rhodiola is not currently recommended for monotherapy or adjunctive use in major depressive disorder based on mixed evidence (110318). Clinical research shows that taking a specific rhodiola extract (SHR-5, Swedish Herbal Institute) 340 mg once or twice daily reduces symptoms of mild-to-moderate depression after 6 weeks of treatment when compared with placebo. Rhodiola decreased overall depressive symptoms, emotional instability, insomnia, and somatization; however, it did not improve feelings of self-esteem (17616). Another small clinical study in patients with major depressive disorder of moderate severity shows that adding a higher dose of rhodiola 600 mg to sertraline daily for 12 weeks improves depressive symptoms when compared with either sertraline alone or sertraline with a lower dose of rhodiola (300 mg) (102283).
• Diabetes. Although there has been interest in using oral rhodiola for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of rhodiola for this condition.
• Fatigue. Preliminary clinical research suggests that oral rhodiola extract decreases fatigue in stressful situations. Details: Most preliminary clinical trials have evaluated a specific rhodiola root extract (SHR-5, Swedish Herbal Institute) in various doses and populations. Taking 50 mg of this product twice daily reduces mental fatigue and improves subjective well-being in students during an examination period (1927). Taking 144 mg twice daily for 7 days reduces fatigue, but not stress, in university students (19287). In night shift workers, 170 mg daily for 2 weeks reduces feelings of fatigue and improves mental performance (6877). In military cadets, a single dose of 370-555 mg after 24 hours without sleep improves tests of mental processing and short-term memory (16411). Finally, taking 576 mg daily for 28 days decreases symptoms of fatigue and increases attention, but does not improve quality of life or symptoms of depression, in patients with stress-related fatigue (19286). Other clinical research shows that taking a different rhodiola root extract (Rhodaxon, Teknofarm), 660 mg daily for 20 days, reduces mental fatigue by 30% in first-year university students (19288). Clinical research using another specific dried rhodiola extract (Vitango, Schwabe Pharma) also shows that taking 200 mg twice daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces perceived levels of stress, burnout, and fatigue when compared to baseline in adults experiencing symptoms of burnout. The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group (96459). Rhodiola extract has also been studied in combination schisandra berry extract and Siberian ginseng root extract (ADAPT-232, Swedish Herbal Institute). However, evidence is mixed, with one study showing that 270 mg daily improves attention, accuracy, and speed in tired individuals performing stressful cognitive tasks (19289), and another study showing that 280 mg daily for 7 days does not reduce mental fatigue or stress in university students (19287).
• Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). It is unclear if oral rhodiola is beneficial for GAD. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking a specific rhodiola extract (Rhodax, Bodyonics Ltd.) 170 mg twice daily for 10 weeks decreases anxiety and depression and improves symptom scores when compared to baseline in patients with GAD (16410). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Hearing loss. Although there has been interest in using oral rhodiola for hearing loss, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of rhodiola for this purpose.
• Hyperlipidemia. Although there has been interest in using oral rhodiola for hyperlipidemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of rhodiola for this condition.
• Menopausal symptoms. Oral rhodiola has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients experiencing menopausal symptoms shows that taking a combination product (Menopause Relief EP, EuroPharma USA) containing rhodiola extract 400 mg and black cohosh extract 13 mg daily for 12 weeks improves psychological symptoms of menopause when compared with placebo or black cohosh alone (103269). It is unclear if these findings are due to rhodiola, black cohosh, or the combination.
• Premature ejaculation. Oral rhodiola has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with lifelong premature ejaculation shows that taking a specific combination product (EndEP) containing rhodiola 200 mg, folic acid 200 mcg, zinc 10 mg, and biotin 50 mcg once daily for 90 days increases time to ejaculation by about 29 seconds and improves control of ejaculation in about 60% of participants when compared to baseline. These improvements disappear within 90 days of discontinuing treatment. The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group (96460).
• Sexual arousal. Although there has been interest in using oral rhodiola for improving sexual arousal, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of rhodiola for this condition.
• Stress. Preliminary clinical research suggests that oral rhodiola extract reduces feelings of stress. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with general stress shows that taking a specific dried rhodiola extract (Vitango, Schwabe Pharma) modestly reduces levels of stress in certain situations. Taking 200 mg twice daily before breakfast and lunch for 4 weeks improves stress, disability, and functional impairment when compared to baseline (90431). A small study in college students with anxiety shows that taking 200 mg twice daily for 14 days modestly reduces reported levels of stress, anxiety, anger, confusion, and negative mood when compared to a control group (96462). In adults experiencing symptoms of burnout, taking this specific extract 200 mg twice daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces perceived levels of stress, burnout, and fatigue and improves sexual satisfaction when compared to baseline. The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group (96459). Rhodiola has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients in individuals with stress. A small clinical study in healthy adults with chronic stress shows that taking a specific combination product (Mg-Teadiola, Sanofi-Aventis), containing rhodiola extract 222 mg, magnesium 150 mg, green tea extract 125 mg (providing theanine 50 mg), vitamin B6 0.7 mg, vitamin B9 0.1 mg, and vitamin B12 1.25 mcg, daily for 4 weeks reduces stress scores when compared with placebo (108672). It is unclear if these findings are due to rhodiola, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Tuberculosis. Although there has been interest in using oral rhodiola for tuberculosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of rhodiola for this condition.
• Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). Although there has been interest in using oral rhodiola for URTI prevention, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of rhodiola for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate rhodiola for these uses.

(Read more about RHODIOLA)

EFFECTIVE

• Ariboflavinosis. Oral riboflavin can treat and prevent low riboflavin levels.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Hyperhomocysteinemia. Oral riboflavin reduces homocysteine levels in individuals with the MTHFR 677 TT genotype. It does not seem to provide benefit in individuals with other genotypes. Details: Population research has found that poor riboflavin status is associated with high homocysteine levels in individuals with the 677 TT genotype for the MTHFR enzyme (71386,71403,71409). Taking riboflavin 1.6 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces homocysteine levels by 22% to 40% in individuals with the 677 TT genotype of MTHFR when compared with pretreatment. However, riboflavin supplementation does not seem to reduce homocysteine levels in individuals with the 677 CC or CT genotypes (71443).
• Migraine headache. Oral riboflavin modestly reduces migraine attack frequency and severity in adults. The benefits of oral riboflavin in children are unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of 5 small clinical trials in adults with migraine shows that taking riboflavin 100-400 mg daily, alone or in combination with other natural ingredients, for three months modestly reduces migraine duration, frequency, and pain scores when compared with control (105480). These findings are limited by significant heterogeneity. Most clinical studies compared riboflavin 400 mg daily with placebo, no treatment, or an active control (1396,1397,1398,12387,105480). Limited evidence also suggests that taking riboflavin 400 mg daily might be no different for migraine prevention than certain conventional treatments such as bisoprolol 10 mg, metoprolol 200 mg, propranolol 80 mg, or valproate 500 mg (1396,105480). These findings are limited due to small study size and a lack of power to detect a difference between groups. Limited research has also evaluated riboflavin in children. A network meta-analysis of 3 small clinical trials in children with migraine shows that taking oral riboflavin 100-200 mg daily for 4-12 months does not significantly reduce incidence of migraine when compared with placebo. However, there was a non-significant trend towards reduced migraine frequency. Furthermore, conventional treatments such as propranolol, pregabalin, valproate, and topiramate were not shown to be significantly better than riboflavin for migraine prevention (105484). These findings are limited by small population sizes and insufficient power to detect differences between groups. Although riboflavin 100-200 mg has been used in prospective clinical studies, small observational studies have found some benefit in children taking riboflavin doses as low as 10-40 mg daily and as high as 400 mg daily for 3-4 months (105481,105485). Riboflavin has also been studied in combination with other ingredients, with research suggesting potential benefit. Specifically, riboflavin 400 mg has been combined with magnesium 600 mg and coenzyme Q10 150 mg daily (Dolovent; Linpharma Inc.) (92101), and also with magnesium 300 mg and feverfew 100 mg daily (12389).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Although there is interest in using oral riboflavin for acne, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of riboflavin for this purpose.
• Alzheimer disease. Although there is interest in using oral riboflavin for Alzheimer disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of riboflavin for this condition.
• Anxiety. It is unclear if oral riboflavin is beneficial for anxiety. Details: A large observational cohort study in adults suggests that a dietary riboflavin intake above 2.1 mg daily is associated with a 5% lower prevalence of anxiety when compared with a riboflavin intake less than 1.6 mg daily. Subgroup analysis suggests that this association is especially strong in males (111209).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if oral riboflavin can prevent mortality due to CVD. Details: Epidemiological research has found that dietary and supplemental riboflavin intake in the highest quartile, around 3.4 mg daily, is associated with a 47% lower risk of CVD mortality when compared with riboflavin intake in the lowest quartile, around 1 mg daily. The reduction in CVD mortality with riboflavin was enhanced by higher folate intake (110727). The validity of this finding is limited by the fact that dietary riboflavin intake was based on 2-day dietary recall.
• Carpal tunnel syndrome. Although there is interest in using oral riboflavin for carpal tunnel syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of riboflavin for this purpose.
• Cataracts. It is unclear if oral riboflavin is beneficial in patients with cataracts. Details: Observational research has found that high dietary intake of riboflavin is associated with a reduced risk of nuclear cataracts and age-related lens opacification (6378,14301). Furthermore, a clinical study in Chinese patients with nutrient deficiencies shows that taking a combination of riboflavin 3 mg plus niacin 40 mg daily also seems to reduce the risk of developing nuclear cataracts when compared with no supplementation (4885). It is unclear if the benefit is due to riboflavin, niacin, or the combination.
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral riboflavin helps to prevent cervical cancer. Details: Epidemiological evidence has found that increased riboflavin intake from dietary and supplement sources, along with other B vitamins, is associated with a reduced risk of precancerous cervical lesions (11074).
• Cognitive function. Oral riboflavin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in healthy adults aged 40-65 years shows that taking a combination supplement containing riboflavin 70 mg, other group B vitamins, ginkgo leaf, and bacopa daily for 12 weeks does not improve measures of memory, attention, cognition, mood, or stress reactivity when compared with placebo (111334).
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral riboflavin reduces colorectal cancer risk. Details: Epidemiological evidence in a Chinese population suggests that increased dietary intake of riboflavin is associated with a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (105482).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral riboflavin is beneficial for depression. Details: A large cross-sectional study in middle-aged adults suggests that dietary riboflavin intake above 2.1 mg daily is associated with an 8% lower prevalence of depression when compared with a riboflavin intake less than 1.6 mg daily. Subgroup analysis suggests that this association is especially strong in males (111209).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral riboflavin reduces the risk of developing gestational diabetes. Details: A large prospective cohort study in pregnant adults shows that supplementation with riboflavin at doses over 2.5 mg daily during the first trimester and 2.1 mg daily in the second trimester is associated with a lower risk of developing gestational diabetes when compared with riboflavin doses under 1.1 mg daily. However, this effect was not found for dietary intake of riboflavin, only supplementation. Additionally, the participants were mostly Han Chinese adults, limiting the generalizability of the findings to other populations (111680).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Intravenous and oral riboflavin have only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; riboflavin's effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that intravenous administration of a specific combination product containing succinic acid, inosine, nicotinamide, and riboflavin (Cytoflavin, Polysan) daily for 10 days followed by an oral formulation of the same product, taken daily for 76 days, reduces symptoms of diabetic neuropathy including paresthesia, numbness, and burning when compared with placebo (110503). It is unclear if these findings are due to riboflavin, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Esophageal cancer. It is unclear if oral riboflavin reduces esophageal cancer risk. Details: Population research in Iranian patients has found that low riboflavin status is associated with a two-fold increase in the risk of esophageal cancer (71439). However, not all evidence agrees. Preliminary clinical studies in Chinese individuals with esophageal dysplasia shows that taking riboflavin, alone or in combination with calcium or niacin, for 3-5 years does not seem to reduce the risk of esophageal cancer in patients when compared with baseline or control (4679,63576,71488). Taking riboflavin 200 mg weekly, in combination with retinol 15 mg and zinc 50 mg, also does not seem to be beneficial in this patient population (71501). It is unclear if these findings are generalizable to geographic locations other than China and Iran.
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral riboflavin reduces colorectal cancer risk. Details: Low quality clinical research in a Chinese population shows that taking riboflavin in combination with niacin does not reduce the risk of gastric cancer when compared with control (4679).
• Hypertension. There is limited evidence on the oral use of riboflavin for reducing blood pressure in patients with the MTHFR 677 TT genotype. Details: A 677 C to T polymorphism on the MTHFR gene has been associated with hypertension. In patients with a confirmed MTHFR 677 TT genotype and premature cardiovascular disease, preliminary clinical research suggests that taking riboflavin 1.6 mg daily for 16 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 9 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 6 mmHg when compared with placebo. This decrease in blood pressure is larger than that reported in other trials, which may be due to the fact that only patients with the 677 TT genotype were included. These patients seem to respond to riboflavin therapy more so than patients with 677 CC or 677 CT genotype (92102). Additional clinical research in patients with the 677 TT genotype but without cardiovascular disease shows that taking riboflavin 1.6 mg daily for 16 weeks reduces SBP by 5.6 mmHg but does not reduce DBP (92103). There is also interest in using dietary riboflavin for reducing the onset of hypertension. Some epidemiological evidence in a Chinese population has found that increased dietary intake of riboflavin is associated with a reduced risk of developing hypertension (105483).
• Liver cancer. Oral riboflavin has only been evaluated in combination with niacin; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in Chinese individuals older than 55 years shows that taking riboflavin in combination with niacin does not seem to prevent liver cancer mortality when compared with control. However, there was a reduced risk of liver cancer mortality in people aged less than 55 years when compared with control (63470).
• Lung cancer. Oral riboflavin has only been evaluated in combination with niacin; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in Chinese individuals shows that taking riboflavin in combination with niacin does not appear to reduce the risk of lung cancer when compared with control (34539).
• Malaria. Oral riboflavin has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children ages 5-14 years living in Gambia and at high risk for malaria exposure suggests that taking riboflavin, in combination with iron, thiamine, and vitamin C, for 3 months does not reduce the frequency or severity of malaria infections when compared with placebo (56730).
• Malnutrition. There is limited evidence on the oral use of riboflavin with other ingredients in children at risk for kwashiorkor. Details: A clinical study in Malawian children at risk for kwashiorkor, a severe form of malnutrition, suggests that taking riboflavin, vitamin E, selenium, and N-acetyl cysteine at a dose of three times the recommended dietary allowance does not prevent kwashiorkor, reduce edema, increase physical growth, or reduce infection when compared with placebo (71433).
• Mitochondrial myopathies. Although there is interest in using oral riboflavin for mitochondrial myopathies, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of riboflavin for this condition.
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). It is unclear if oral riboflavin slows the progression of MS-related disability. Details: A small clinical study in patients with relapsing-remitting MS or secondary progressive MS who are undergoing treatment with disease-modifying therapies suggests that taking oral riboflavin 10 mg daily for six months is no more effective for improving disability than placebo (91752). The validity of this finding is limited by the small study sample size.
• Oral leukoplakia. It is unclear if oral riboflavin prevents or slows progression of oral leukoplakia. Details: Population research in people living in Uzbekistan suggests that low blood levels of riboflavin are associated with an increased prevalence of oral leukoplakia (71502). However, clinical evidence in patients with a high occurrence of oral and esophageal cancer who are living in Uzbekistan suggests that taking riboflavin 80 mg weekly for 20 months does not improve the prevalence or progression of oral leukoplakia when compared to baseline (71565). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a placebo group and unusual once weekly dosing. Furthermore, it is unclear if these results are generalizable to other geographic locations.
• Pre-eclampsia. Although there is interest in using oral riboflavin for pre-eclampsia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of riboflavin for this purpose.
• Pregnancy-related iron deficiency. It is unclear if oral riboflavin is beneficial in patients with iron deficiency due to pregnancy. Details: Preliminary clinical research in pregnant patients in China suggests that adding riboflavin 1 mg daily to supplemental iron and folic acid does not improve iron status when compared with taking iron and folic acid alone (71480).
• Sickle cell disease. It is unclear if oral riboflavin is beneficial in patients with sickle cell disease. Details: One small clinical study in patients with sickle cell disease suggests that taking riboflavin 5 mg twice daily for 8 weeks increases serum iron and transferrin saturation when compared to baseline; however, riboflavin does not seem to improve serum ferritin or circulating hemoglobin levels (71566).
• Stroke. Oral riboflavin has only been evaluated in combination with niacin; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in Chinese individuals with poor nutritional status who are at risk for stroke suggests that taking riboflavin 5.2 mg daily in combination with niacin 40 mg daily does not reduce the risk of stroke-related mortality (2673). More evidence is needed to rate riboflavin for these uses.

(Read more about RIBOFLAVIN)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Aging. Although there is interest in using oral schisandra for aging, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of schisandra for this purpose.
• Asthma. Although there is interest in using oral schisandra for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of schisandra for this condition.
• Athletic performance. Although there is interest in using oral schisandra for athletic performance, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of schisandra for this purpose.
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Oral schisandra has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults with a history of COVID-19 infection and current symptoms of long COVID-19 shows that taking 30 mL of a specific combination product (Chisan / ADAPT-232, Swedish Herbal Institute) containing schisandra extract 300 mg, rhodiola extract 90 mg, and eleuthero extract 78 mg twice daily for 2 weeks increases exercise capacity, but does not reduce the number of days with fatigue, headache, cough, respiratory problems, or other symptoms of long COVID-19, when compared with placebo (109635).
• Cough. Although there is interest in using oral schisandra for cough, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of schisandra for this purpose.
• Diarrhea. Although there is interest in using oral schisandra for diarrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of schisandra for this purpose.
• Diabetes. Although there is interest in using oral schisandra for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of schisandra for this condition.
• Familial Mediterranean fever. Oral schisandra has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study in children ages 3-15 years with familial Mediterranean fever shows that taking a combination product (ImmunoGuard, Inspired Nutritionals) containing schisandra extract 100 mg, andrographis, Siberian ginseng, and licorice reduces symptom duration, frequency, and severity when compared with placebo (12382). It is unclear if these effects are due to schisandra, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Hepatitis. Although there is interest in using oral schisandra for hepatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of schisandra for this condition.
• Hypercholesterolemia. Although there is interest in using oral schisandra for hypercholesterolemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of schisandra for this condition.
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). Oral schisandra has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate sized clinical trial in adults with prediabetes shows that taking schisandra fruit extract with a soybean mixture 250 mg twice daily for 12 weeks decreases fasting plasma glucose by around 6 mg/dL and improves 30- and 60-minute post-prandial glucose levels but does not reduce glycated hemoglobin when compared with placebo (112887). The ratio of the schisandra extract to soybean mixture in the product was 5:1. It is unclear if these effects are due to schisandra, soybean, or the combination.
• Menopausal symptoms. It is unclear if oral schisandra is beneficial for improving menopausal symptoms. Details: A small clinical trial in healthy patients with moderate or severe menopausal symptoms shows that taking schisandra extract (BMO-30, Biomix Inc) 784 mg in two divided doses daily for 6 weeks improves hot flushes and other menopausal symptoms when compared with placebo (96632).
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral schisandra is beneficial for improving muscle strength. Details: A small clinical study in healthy middle-aged females shows that taking schisandra powdered extract (Bioport Korea Inc.) 500 mg twice daily for 12 weeks seems to modestly increase quadriceps muscle strength and grip strength, but does not affect overall muscle mass, when compared with placebo (105563).
• Myopia. Although there is interest in using topical schisandra for myopia in children, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of schisandra for this condition.
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral schisandra is beneficial for improving physical function in older adults. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults over 50 years of age shows that taking schisandra 500 mg twice daily, 30 minutes after breakfast and dinner, for 12 months improves knee extension peak torque, but does not improve hand grip strength or body composition, when compared with placebo (105562).
• Pneumonia. Oral schisandra has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults with acute, nonspecific pneumonia shows that taking 20 mL of a specific combination product (ADAPT-232 CHI San, Swedish Herbal Institute) containing schisandra berry extract 51%, rhodiola root extract 27.6%, and eleuthero root extract 24.4% twice daily for 10-15 days reduces the duration of antibiotic treatment and may improve quality of life when compared with standard treatment alone (71152). It is unclear if these effects are due to schisandra, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Stress. Oral schisandra has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy, fatigued females under experimental stress suggests that taking a single, 270 mg dose of a combination product (ADAPT-232, Swedish Herbal Institute) containing schisandra, rhodiola, and Siberian ginseng improves attention, as well as cognitive task speed and accuracy, when compared with placebo (19289). It is unclear if these effects are due to schisandra, other ingredients, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate schisandra for these uses.

(Read more about SCHISANDRA)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Cystic fibrosis. Long-term nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride improves lung function and reduces pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis show that, when taken along with a bronchodilator and other standard therapies, nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride in concentrations of 3% to 7%, up to 10 mL twice daily for 4 weeks, increases forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) when compared with isotonic saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) (26230,26230). This benefit was not seen at 48 weeks. Other clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis shows that inhaling sodium chloride 7%, 4 mL twice daily for 48 weeks, does not improve FEV1 when compared with isotonic saline. However, chronic treatment with hypertonic saline does reduce the number of pulmonary exacerbations and increase the number of patients without pulmonary exacerbations when compared with isotonic saline (29402). It is not clear if this benefit occurs in children with cystic fibrosis. The Pulmonary Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends that individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 6 years or older use nebulized hypertonic saline long-term to improve lung function, reduce the number of exacerbations, and improve quality of life (29403).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity. Oral sodium chloride seems to prevent nephrotoxicity associated with use of amphotericin B. Details: Clinical research shows that administering oral or intravenous sodium chloride 150 mEq daily during treatment with amphotericin B can attenuate the rise in serum creatinine levels and preserve renal function when compared to treatment with amphotericin B alone (26226).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in preventing lithium level fluctuations in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A moderate-sized open-label clinical study in adults with type I bipolar disorder receiving lithium carbonate shows that taking sodium chloride 1 gram daily for 12 weeks along with dietary salt restriction of 1 gram daily reduces the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L, but does not significantly affect serum sodium, potassium, aldosterone, or creatinine levels when compared with controls who were not salt restricted, but were advised not to consume additional salt at the table (112909). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by missing data in both groups.
• Canker sores. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for canker sores, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Congestive heart failure. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in patients with acute decompensated heart failure requiring decongestive therapy with diuretics. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure requiring high-dose intravenous furosemide shows that taking sodium chloride 2 grams three times daily for up to 96 hours does not affect patient weight or serum creatinine levels when compared with placebo (112911). However, the clinical relevance of this study is unclear and it may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Conjunctivitis. Although there is interest in using ophthalmic sodium chloride for conjunctivitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Hyponatremia. Although there is interest in using oral sodium chloride for hyponatremia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral sodium chloride for this condition.
• Pharyngitis. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for pharyngitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial for premature infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in infants born at less than 32 weeks' gestation shows that adding sodium 4 mEq/kg daily to enteral feedings, starting from the 7th day after birth and continuing through the 35th day, reduces the risk of developing hyponatremia and improves weight gain when compared with adding water (98180). A small, open-label clinical study in newborns less than 35 weeks gestation shows that high sodium intake, defined as an average of 0.25% sodium in maintenance fluids, for 48 hours on day 2 and 3 after birth results in less weight loss within the first 72 hours of life when compared with control, but does not improve mortality, length of hospital stay, or complications from prematurity (112908). However, interpretation of these findings is limited by varied concentrations of sodium as an intervention. More evidence is needed to rate sodium for these uses.

(Read more about SODIUM)

EFFECTIVE

• Thiamine deficiency. Oral thiamine prevents and treats thiamine deficiency syndromes. Details: Thiamine deficiency is treated with oral thiamine 5-30 mg daily as a single dose or in divided daily doses for one month. For severe deficiency, thiamine up to 300 mg daily can be used (15).Thiamine deficiency can occur in people with malabsorption conditions such as alcohol use disorder, cirrhosis, and gastrointestinal diseases; in those with inadequate intake due to anorexia, nausea, and vomiting; and in those with increased requirements, including pregnancy, increased carbohydrate intake, increased physical activity, hyperthyroidism, infection, and liver disease. However, deficiency is rare with these conditions (15). The elderly might also be at increased risk for subclinical thiamine deficiency (11076).
• Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome (WKS). Parenteral thiamine is effective for treating symptoms of WKS. Details: Parenteral administration of thiamine 5-200 mg daily for 2 days decreases the risk of developing WKS and decreases symptoms of WKS in acute alcohol withdrawal. Between 30% and 80% of alcoholics are suspected to have thiamine deficiency (11075). An optimal dose for treating WKS has not been established; however, early research suggests that a 200 mg intramuscular dose may be more effective than lower doses (11075). In contrast, a moderate-sized clinical trial in adults with a history of heavy alcohol use who were asymptomatic or symptomatic for WKS shows that there is no benefit to administering high doses (300 mg 3 times daily) compared with medium (100 mg 3 times daily) or low (100 mg daily) doses of parenteral thiamine on cognitive or neurological functioning (111690). The study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Dysmenorrhea. Oral thiamine might reduce pain in some patients with dysmenorrhea. Details: A clinical study in adolescent Iranian females with dysmenorrhea shows that taking thiamine 100 mg alone or along with fish oil 500 mg daily for 2 months moderately reduces pain intensity and duration when compared with placebo (89341). Another preliminary clinical study in Indian females 12-21 years of age with moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhea shows that taking thiamine 100 mg daily for 90 days eliminates pain in 87% of participants when compared to baseline (77820). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a placebo group. Furthermore, available research was conducted in India and Iran, so it is unclear if these findings are generalizable to other geographic locations.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Intravenous thiamine does not seem to improve outcomes after CABG surgery. Details: A small clinical study in adults undergoing CABG surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass shows that giving intravenous thiamine 200 mg immediately prior to surgery and immediately after surgery does not improve clinical outcomes or lactate levels when compared with placebo (97010). Larger doses of thiamine also don't seem to be beneficial. Another small clinical study in patients receiving CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass shows that giving thiamine 600 mg intravenously on the day of surgery, and 400 mg daily for three postoperative days, does not improve postoperative outcomes when compared with placebo (103000).
• Heart failure. Most research suggests that oral or intravenous thiamine does not improve outcomes in patients with heart failure. Details: Observational research suggests that having heart failure is associated with 2.5-fold increased odds of having thiamine deficiency, possibly because of diuretic use, intestinal malabsorption, and metabolism changes. However, it is unclear if thiamine supplementation is beneficial. A meta-analysis of 2 small clinical trials in adults with systolic heart failure and unclear thiamine status shows that thiamine 200-300 mg given orally or by IV for 7-28 days improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by 3% when compared with control (97012). However, other meta-analyses and clinical studies in adults with heart failure with or without thiamine deficiency show that taking intravenous, intramuscular, or oral thiamine 100-500 mg daily does not improve LVEF fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, dyspnea, mortality, hospitalization, or exercise tolerance when compared with placebo or control (103002,111682,111686,111688).
• Mosquito repellent. Oral thiamine does not seem to repel mosquitos. Details: Clinical research in healthy volunteers shows that taking thiamine does not improve mosquito repellency when compared with taking vitamin C as a control (18016).
• Sepsis. Intravenous or oral thiamine, alone or in combination with vitamin C and hydrocortisone, does not seem to reduce mortality or prevent organ failure in sepsis or septic shock. Details: Multiple meta-analyses of small clinical studies in patients with septic shock show that intravenous or oral thiamine 100-500 mg 2-3 times daily for 3-7 days is no better than placebo for improving mortality, end-organ damage, number of ventilator-free days, and duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (105443,107717,107727,111689). One meta-analysis suggests that administration of thiamine alone increases the risk of mortality in these patients (111689). Subgroup analyses including only higher quality studies also fail to show a benefit of thiamine (107717). Another recent small clinical trial in patients with septic shock shows that receiving the same dose of intravenous thiamine does not increase vasopressor-free days when compared with placebo (105441). Intravenous thiamine 200 mg every 12 hours has also been evaluated in combination with intravenous vitamin C 1.5-2 grams and hydrocortisone 50-200 mg every 6-12 hours for 4-10 days (HAT therapy). While some retrospective research found HAT therapy to be beneficial (100315,102980,111689), high-quality, prospective clinical research has shown no benefit (105447,109956,111689). Meta-analyses in patients with sepsis and septic shock shows that receiving HAT therapy does not improve mortality, kidney injury, number of ventilator-free days, or ICU length of stay when compared with control (102129,104027,104028,104032,102998,105447,109956,111642,111689). Additionally, the meta-analyses suggest that HAT therapy does not reverse shock or improve sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores (109556,111642). However, one meta-analysis found that HAT therapy shortened the duration of vasopressor use when compared with placebo (111642). Long-term follow up from a study in patients with sepsis-induced respiratory and/or cardiovascular dysfunction shows that receiving HAT therapy does not improve cognitive, psychological, or functional status after 6 months and, for immediate memory scores and development of posttraumatic stress disorder, HAT therapy was less beneficial when compared with placebo (111299).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acute kidney injury (AKI). It is unclear if oral or intravenous thiamine is beneficial for treating or preventing AKI. Details: Observational research in adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with AKI has found that treatment with thiamine (dose unspecified) within the first 48 hours of admission is associated with 39% lower odds of in-hospital mortality and 28% higher odds of kidney function recovery when compared with patients that did not receive thiamine. Receiving thiamine was also associated with a 0.5-day reduction in ICU length of stay (107719).
• Anxiety. Although there is interest in using oral thiamine for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of thiamine for this purpose.
• Cardiac arrest. It is unclear if intravenous thiamine reduces the risk of death after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Details: A small clinical study in adults resuscitated from cardiac arrest shows that receiving intravenous thiamine 100 mg every 8 hours for 7 days does not reduce 28-day mortality when compare with a normal saline placebo (105442).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial for treating or preventing CVD. Details: Population research in Korea has found that insufficient dietary thiamine intake (daily intake of less than 1.22 mg in males or 1.03 mg in females) is associated with a 16% increased odds of developing angina or myocardial infarction when compared with sufficient dietary thiamine. However, the effects of thiamine supplementation on CVD have not been studied (107725).
• Cataracts. Small studies suggest that increased dietary thiamine might help prevent cataracts. Details: Observational research has found that a high dietary intake of thiamine 10 mg daily is associated with 40% lower odds of nuclear cataracts (6378). Other population research has found that higher dietary intake of thiamine is associated with a modestly reduced risk of age-related lens opacification (14301).
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral thiamine reduces the risk of developing cervical cancer. Details: Epidemiological research has found that increasing intake of thiamine from dietary and supplemental sources, along with folic acid, riboflavin, and vitamin B12, is associated with a lower odds of precancerous cervical lesions (11074).
• Child development. It is unclear if supplementing breastfeeding females with oral thiamine improves infant neurocognitive development. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that supplementing breastfeeding females with oral thiamine, 1.2-10 mg daily for 22 weeks, starting at 2 weeks postpartum, does not improve most cognitive or neurodevelopmental scores in the child when compared with placebo. However, one subgroup analysis suggests that thiamine supplementation may improve language scores (107726).
• Cognitive function. Oral thiamine has only been studied in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in healthy, middle-aged adults shows that taking a combination product containing thiamine hydrochloride 50 mg, other group B vitamins, bacopa, and ginkgo daily for 12 weeks does not improve measures of memory, attention, cognition, mood, or stress reactivity when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis shows a possible benefit of the combination supplementation on measures of attention in those with an optimal diet at baseline (111334). It is unclear if these findings are due to thiamine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if intravenous or oral thiamine improves clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Details: A small observational study of adults admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 has found that treatment with intravenous or oral thiamine 100 mg daily for an average of 7 days is associated with a 63% reduction in the odds of death within 30 days when compared with control. However, there was no associated reduction in duration of hospitalization or mechanical ventilation (107721). In addition, a small observational study of adults with encephalopathy that were mechanically ventilated secondary to COVID-19 has found that taking thiamine 500 mg three times daily orally for 5 days improves neurological manifestations, including ophthalmoparesis and ataxia, when compared with baseline. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group (107722).
• Critical illness (trauma). It is unclear if oral or intravenous thiamine is beneficial in patients with critical illness. Details: A meta-analysis of critically ill patients shows that treatment with oral or intravenous thiamine 100-600 mg daily for up to 7 days does not affect the need for mechanical ventilation, duration of hospital stay, or mortality when compared with control (107727).
• Delirium. It is unclear if oral or intravenous thiamine helps to prevent or treat delirium. Details: In critically ill patients, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that treatment with oral or intravenous thiamine 100-600 mg daily for up to 7 days reduces the odds of developing delirium by 42% when compared with control (107727). However, some observational research in adults with septic shock has found that receiving intravenous thiamine 400 mg daily with vitamin C 6 grams daily, both in divided doses, is not associated with reduced delirium when compared with control (103001). In non-critically ill, hospitalized adults with altered mental status, retrospective, observational research has also found that administration of oral or intravenous thiamine is not associated with improved cognitive function or reduced in-hospital mortality when compared with control (107723). Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant also shows that administering thiamine 200 mg three times a day intravenously for 7 days does not prevent delirium or shorten duration of delirium when compared with placebo (107718).
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial for the prevention of dementia. Details: Observational research in patients with alcohol use disorder has found that taking thiamine is associated with a 24% to 46% lower risk of developing dementia when compared with not taking thiamine (102999).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial in patients with depression. Details: Meta-analyses of population research in adults has found that high dietary consumption of thiamine is associated with a 10% to 31% lower risk of having depression when compared with low dietary consumption of thiamine. However, this research did not evaluate the effects of thiamine supplementation on depression (107133,107725). One small clinical study in adults with major depressive disorder shows that taking thiamine 300 mg daily in conjunction with fluoxetine 20 mg daily leads to greater improvements in depressive symptoms at 6 weeks when compared to fluoxetine with placebo. This benefit was no longer present at 12 weeks. This suggests that thiamine may accelerate improvement in symptoms during initiation of fluoxetine therapy (97013).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial for type 2 diabetes or gestational diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking thiamine 100-300 mg or its derivative benfotiamine 120-900 mg daily for 1-3 months does not reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose, or postprandial blood glucose when compared with placebo (111681). A large, prospective cohort study in adults without type 2 diabetes suggests that the risk of new-onset diabetes is minimized in adults consuming thiamine 0.75-1.10 mg daily from the diet, while lower and higher thiamine intake levels are associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes (111685). Thiamine has also been studied for preventing gestational diabetes. A large, prospective cohort study in pregnant adults suggests that higher supplementation with thiamine during the first and second trimesters is associated with a lower risk of gestational diabetes when compared with lower levels of total thiamine intake. However, this effect was not found for dietary intake of thiamine, only supplementation. Additionally, the participants were mostly Han Chinese adults, limiting the generalizability of the findings to other populations (111680).
• Diabetic nephropathy. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial for diabetic nephropathy. Details: A small clinical study in patients with early-stage diabetic nephropathy and microalbuminuria shows that taking thiamine 100 mg three times daily for 3 months decreases urinary albumin excretion, but does not affect glomerular filtration rate (GFR), when compared with placebo (16556).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Although there is interest in using oral thiamine for diabetic neuropathy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of thiamine for this condition.
• Dry eye. Oral thiamine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with dry eye suggests that adding unspecified doses of thiamine and mecobalamin to treatment with daily artificial tears and corticosteroid drops might slightly improve overall symptoms when compared with only artificial tears and corticosteroid drops for 1 month. There were no differences between groups at 2 months (105444). This finding is limited due to incomplete reporting and a lack of adjustment for multiple hypothesis testing.
• Dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial for treating or preventing dyslipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking thiamine 100-300 mg or its derivative benfotiamine 120-900 mg daily for 1-3 months does not improve low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglycerides when compared with placebo (111681). Observational research in Korea suggests that insufficient dietary thiamine intake (daily intake of less than 1.22 mg in males or 1.03 mg in females) is associated with 10% higher odds of developing dyslipidemia when compared with sufficient dietary thiamine intake. However, the effects of thiamine supplementation on dyslipidemia have not been studied (107725).
• Emergence delirium. It is unclear if intravenous thiamine helps to prevent emergence delirium in patients after surgery. Details: One clinical study in adults in the intensive care unit (ICU) after gastrointestinal surgery shows that receiving intravenous thiamine 200 mg daily for 3 days is associated with up to 84% lower odds of emergence delirium on the first two days, but not on the third day, when compared with a normal saline control (105440).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial in patients with fatigue. Details: A small clinical crossover study in patients with chronic fatigue and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) shows that taking thiamine 600-1800 mg daily for 20 days reduces fatigue scores when compared with placebo (105438). Taking oral thiamine 300 mg daily for an additional 12 weeks did not seem to affect fatigue scores when compared with placebo. However, an observational follow-up study found that those who self-continued thiamine for an additional 24 weeks after the study ended reported lower fatigue scores when compared with those who did not self-continue thiamine (107720).
• Glaucoma. Although there is interest in using oral thiamine for glaucoma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of thiamine for this condition.
• Herpes zoster (shingles). It is unclear if subcutaneous thiamine is beneficial in patients with shingles. Details: A small clinical trial shows that receiving subcutaneous thiamine 100 mg injections six times weekly for 4 weeks reduces itching by at least 30% in 67% of patients with herpes zoster. However, thiamine does not appear to significantly reduce pain in most patients (90396).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial in treating or preventing hypertension. Details: Population research in Korea has found that insufficient dietary thiamine intake (daily intake of less than 1.22 mg in males or 1.03 mg in females) is associated with a 5% increased odds of developing hypertension when compared with sufficient dietary thiamine. However, the effects of thiamine supplementation on hypertension have not been studied (107725).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral thiamine is beneficial in patients with prediabetes. Details: A very small clinical trial in patients with prediabetes shows that taking thiamine 100 mg by mouth three times daily for 6 weeks modestly decreases 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose levels when compared to baseline and decreases fasting blood glucose levels when compared with placebo (91168).
• Kidney failure. Oral thiamine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary, low-quality, clinical research in adults with kidney failure undergoing regular hemodialysis shows that taking oral thiamine 90 mg daily with folic acid 30 mg daily for 96 weeks reduces overall mortality by 67% and improves cognitive scores by 31% when compared with no intervention (107724). It is unclear if this effect is due to thiamine, folic acid, or the combination.
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if dietary thiamine is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of migraine headache. Details: A large, retrospective, cross-sectional study suggests that higher dietary intake of thiamine is associated with lower odds of severe headache or migraine, especially in females (111684). The validity of these effects is limited by the subjective outcome measures and retrospective study design.
• Pneumonia. It is unclear if thiamine is beneficial for patients with pneumonia. Details: A large retrospective cohort study in adults hospitalized with pneumonia and active alcohol use disorder suggests that parenteral administration of thiamine is associated with reduced 14-day mortality and more frequent discharges home, but not a shorter length of stay or fewer ICU transfers, when compared with no thiamine use. Furthermore, parenteral thiamine doses above 200 mg do not appear to improve mortality but may be associated with longer length of stay and less frequent discharges home when compared with low oral doses of thiamine or parenteral thiamine at doses under 200 mg (111679). The validity of these effects is limited by the retrospective study design.
• Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). It is unclear if oral or parenteral thiamine is beneficial for patients with VAP. Details: A retrospective study in adults with VAP in the intensive care unit (ICU) suggests that supplementation with intravenous or oral thiamine may be associated with reduced ICU and in-hospital mortality (111683). The validity of these effects is limited by the retrospective study design. More evidence is needed to rate thiamine for these uses.

(Read more about THIAMINE)

EFFECTIVE

• Imerslund-Grasbeck disease. Intramuscular vitamin B12 is effective for patients with this condition. Details: Administering intramuscular vitamin B12 (hydroxocobalamin) 1 mg daily for 10 days, followed by monthly injections for the remainder of a patient's life, is effective for treating familial selective vitamin B12 malabsorption (Imerslund-Grasbeck disease) (15,82862).
• Vitamin B12 deficiency. Administering vitamin B12 orally, intramuscularly, or intranasally is effective for preventing and treating vitamin B12 deficiency. Details: Vitamin B12 deficiency has varying definitions but is often defined as vitamin B12 (cobalamin) levels less than 180-200 pmol/L (or 240 pg/mL). Some believe that only intramuscular vitamin B12 is effective for treating vitamin B12 deficiency. However, clinical research shows that oral therapy increases cobalamin levels similarly to intramuscular administration, even in patients with pernicious anemia or malabsorption, if a high enough dose is given (2909,2911,2915,9335,82832) (82836,82949,82860,103976,103972,107141,107144). Some evidence suggests that the most effective oral dose is between 647-1032 mcg daily (13106). However, in certain situations, intramuscular treatment might be more appropriate. Guidelines by the British Committee for Standards in Hematology recommend only intramuscular vitamin B12 for initial treatment of severe vitamin B12 deficiency in patients with pernicious anemia, malabsorption disorders, or neurological involvement (94722). Intramuscular vitamin B12 is also appropriate in patients with diarrhea or vomiting and those likely to be nonadherent (103972). Vitamin B12 deficiency is especially common in older adults, primarily due to lack of intrinsic factor and malabsorption (2915,2919,9335). Daily supplementation with vitamin B12 50-100 mcg might be needed to correct deficiency (10126), while daily doses of 25-37.5 mcg help to maintain normal levels over time (9335). In addition to supplements, foods such as milk and bread fortified with vitamin B12 can be used and are approximately 55% to 60% absorbed by people over 60 years of age (10124). Vitamin B12 deficiency is also common in patients that have had gastric surgery, including gastrectomy and bariatric surgery (107144,107145). Taking vitamin B12 in the doses found in multivitamins or generic vitamin B supplements does not seem to prevent vitamin B12 deficiency following bariatric surgery (107145). However, taking methylcobalamin 500 mcg daily is beneficial for treating vitamin B12 deficiency associated with a total gastrectomy and taking cyanocobalamin 5000 mcg daily is beneficial for preventing vitamin B12 deficiency following gastric bypass (107144). Other people at risk for vitamin B12 deficiency include strict vegetarians who eat no animal products (vegans) and people with increased vitamin B12 requirements associated with pregnancy, thyrotoxicosis, hemolytic anemia, hemorrhage, malignancy, and hepatic and kidney disease. Moderate consumption of animal products may not be sufficient to restore and maintain vitamin B12 levels, especially in adolescents who had consumed macrobiotic (vegan type) diets for the first 6 years of life. High dietary intake of vitamin B12 or supplements is usually needed in order to restore and maintain optimal vitamin B12 levels in these adolescents (10125).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Cyanide poisoning. Intravenous hydroxocobalamin (Cyanokit) is likely effective as an antidote for patients with suspected or known cyanide toxicity due to inhalation, ingestion, or skin exposure. Details: Treatment of cyanide poisoning with hydroxocobalamin (Cyanokit) up to 10 grams has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and recommended by the Australian Resuscitation Council (82870,82905,82906). Hydroxocobalamin is also FDA-approved for treating cyanide toxicity during pregnancy (82904).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Canker sores. Sublingual or topical vitamin B12 seems to reduce canker sore symptoms. Details: Clinical research in patients with canker sores shows that applying a topical ointment containing vitamin B12 500 mcg in four divided doses daily for 2 days reduces pain levels by 80% when compared with a control ointment not containing vitamin B12 (96176). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking vitamin B12 1000 mcg sublingually daily for 6 months reduces the duration of canker sore outbreaks, the number of ulcers, and level of pain when compared with placebo in patients with normal vitamin B12 levels (17242).
• Hyperhomocysteinemia. Oral vitamin B12 in combination with folic acid, and sometimes with vitamin B6, reduces homocysteine levels. Details: While folic acid 0.5-5 mg daily lowers fasting homocysteine levels by an average of 25%, adding vitamin B12 0.5 mg daily produces an additional decrease of about 7% on average (6883,9400,9401,9405,9409,50145,107136). Vitamin B12 in combination with folic acid and other vitamins also reduces homocysteine levels in patients with kidney failure, sickle cell disease, and those receiving nitrous oxide general anesthesia (1489,6883,6884,7289,7881,9324,9414,9415,9416,9481,82941). Some researchers recommend routine use of vitamin B12 with homocysteine-lowering regimens to avoid the risk of neuropathy in people with undetected vitamin B12 deficiency (9405). Using vitamin B12 alone has a limited effect on homocysteine levels, and probably only in those people with vitamin B12 deficiency (2147,9410,9512). Hyperhomocysteinemia is considered by some to be an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis, recurrent thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke (1899,2147,3323,9402,9405,9408,9409). Clinical research suggests that supplementation with folic acid, pyridoxine, and vitamin B12 decreases homocysteine levels and reduces the atherosclerosis progression in patients at risk for atherosclerosis when compared with placebo (50133,50056,82806). However, other research suggests that elevated homocysteine levels may be a marker, as opposed to a cause, of vascular disease (11387,11388). A 5 µmol/L increase in plasma homocysteine increases the risk of cerebrovascular disease by 50%, and the odds of coronary heart disease by 60% and 80% in males and females, respectively (9407,9411). However, it is not clear if reducing homocysteine levels results in reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (1489,6883,6884,9400,9405,9409,96417). Folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 supplementation can reduce total homocysteine from 13.4 to 11 µmol/L. However, this reduction does not seem improve endothelial function or help with secondary prevention of death or myocardial infarction, and some research even suggests an increase in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk (11387,13482,50373,50314,97619). There is also some debate about whether supplementation with homocysteine-lowering B vitamins can reduce the risk of stroke. A number of large clinical studies and meta-analyses show that supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12, alone or in combination, does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with CVD or impaired kidney function (11387,13482,50423,83050,96150). However, a more recent meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials including over 44,000 patients shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo in patients at risk or with a history of CVD (97619). Also, a meta-analysis in adults with a history of stroke shows that B vitamin supplementation modestly reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% and vascular death by 11% when compared with placebo (107136).
• Postherpetic neuralgia. Subcutaneous injections of vitamin B12 seem to reduce postherpetic neuralgia symptoms. Details: Clinical research in patients with subacute herpetic neuralgia shows that subcutaneous injection of vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin) 1000 mcg six times weekly for 4 weeks reduces pain when compared with oral vitamin B12 or subcutaneous lidocaine (90394). Another clinical study shows that administering local subcutaneous injections of methylcobalamin 1000 mcg plus lidocaine up to 20 mg daily for 12 injections over 14 days, starting within 7 days of the onset of subacute ophthalmic herpetic neuralgia, decreases the mean pain score by 63% to 79% when compared with intravenous lidocaine and intramuscular methylcobalamin. Less than 2 patients need to be treated to achieve a pain reduction to ≤3 out of 10. Healing of rash, itching, numbness, and tingling were also improved (96175). Additional clinical research in patients with postherpetic pain and itching shows that this same dosing regimen of subcutaneous vitamin B12 reduces pain and analgesic requirements when compared to baseline (90396).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Age-related cognitive decline. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to improve cognitive function in older adults when used alone or in combination with other B vitamins. Details: Taking vitamin B12 100-1000 mcg plus folic acid 400-2000 mcg, with or without vitamin B6 3-50 mg, daily for up to about 2 years does not seem to improve tests of cognitive function in adults aged 65 or older, most of whom do not report cognitive impairment at baseline (14392,50225,50510,90392,107140). Also, supplementation with vitamin B12 does not seem to improve cognitive function in elderly individuals with low vitamin B12 levels (12305).
• Alzheimer disease. Oral vitamin B12, when used in combination with other B vitamins, does not seem to improve cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer disease. Details: Clinical research in patients with probable Alzheimer disease using routine medication shows that taking vitamin B12 1 mg, folic acid 5 mg, and vitamin B6 25 mg daily for 18 months does not have a beneficial effect on cognitive function or the severity of disease when compared with placebo. In this study, all patients were consuming a folate-fortified diet (50319). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research in elderly adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia shows that taking vitamin B12, usually with other B vitamins, does not improve cognitive function (50510). Observational research has also found that higher vitamin B12 intake over 3 years in a population consuming a folate-fortified diet is not associated with a decreased risk of developing Alzheimer disease (15270). In contrast, preliminary clinical research in patients with probable Alzheimer disease who are not consuming a folate-fortified diet shows that taking vitamin B12 50 mcg daily plus folic acid 1.2 mg daily for 6 months modestly improves some measures of cognitive performance and decreases levels of homocysteine when compared with placebo (107150). More research is needed to determine if any changes in this latter study are clinically relevant.
• Cataracts. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to reduce cataract development. Details: Clinical research in women with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or at increased risk of CVD shows that taking a combination of folic acid 2.5 mg daily, vitamin B6 50 mg daily, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for an average of 7.3 years does not reduce the risk of cataracts and seems to increase the risk of cataract extraction by 28% when compared with placebo (96149).
• Circadian rhythm sleep disorders. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to improve sleep disorders. Details: Oral vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin) does not seem to be effective for treating delayed sleep phase syndrome. Methylcobalamin 0.5-1 mg three times daily, with or without bright light therapy, also does not seem to help people with primary circadian rhythm sleep disorders (1344,1345,1346,1347,1348).
• Cognitive impairment. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to be beneficial for older adults with cognitive impairment. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in elderly adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia shows that taking vitamin B12, usually with other B vitamins, does not improve cognitive function (50510). One clinical trial in elderly people with memory complaints shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 0.8 mg, vitamin B12 0.5 mg, and vitamin B6 (form not specified) 20 mg daily for 24 months reduces cerebral atrophy in the gray matter regions associated with Alzheimer disease by up to seven-fold when compared with placebo. However, this protection does not occur in patients with the lowest average blood levels of homocysteine (90374).
• Fall prevention. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to reduce the risk of falls. Details: Clinical research shows that taking B vitamins, including folic acid 400 mcg and vitamin B12 500 mcg, daily for 2 years does not prevent falls when compared with placebo in elderly individuals also taking vitamin D (96148).
• Osteoporosis. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Details: Clinical research in elderly patients or patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease shows that taking vitamin B12 500 mcg and folic acid 0.4-2 mg, with or without vitamin B6 25 mg, daily for 2-3 years does not seem to reduce the risk for osteoporotic fractures when compared with placebo (90377,90393). A 5-7 year follow-up of this research has also found no benefit (103981).
• Physical performance. Oral vitamin B12 does not seem to improve physical performance in older adults. Details: Clinical research shows that taking B vitamins, including folic acid 400 mcg and vitamin B12 500 mcg, daily for 2 years does not increase hand strength or improve performance such as walking when compared with placebo in elderly individuals also taking vitamin D (96148).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large-scale clinical study shows that taking vitamin B12 1000 mcg, folic acid 2.5 mg, and vitamin B6 50 mg daily, reduces the risk of developing AMD in females over 40 years of age with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or at least three risk factors for CVD. Those who took this combination for an average of 7.3 years had a 34% reduced risk of developing AMD and a 41% reduced risk of visually significant AMD when compared with placebo (14620). It is unclear if this effect is due to vitamin B12, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). It is unclear if high-dose intramuscular vitamin B12 improves the prognosis of ALS. Details: A clinical study in patients with ALS symptoms for 3 years or less shows that intramuscular vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin) 25-50 mg twice weekly for 3.5 years does not slow functional decline or increase the time until ventilation or death when compared with placebo. However, other clinical research in patients with early-stage ALS shows that intramuscular methylcobalamin 50 mg twice weekly for 16 weeks is associated with slower functional decline and a longer period of time until death or full ventilation when compared with placebo (104947,111556). These effects seem to be particularly notable in fine and gross motor skills, but not bulbar or respiratory functions. Furthermore, vitamin B12 and riluzole slowed clinical progression of ALS more than riluzole alone (111556).
• Angioplasty. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Some evidence suggests that vitamin B12 400 mcg, folic acid 1 mg, and vitamin B6 10 mg daily can decrease the rate of restenosis in patients treated with balloon angioplasty (8009,9412,34540). However, this combination does not seem to be as effective for reducing restenosis in patients after coronary stenting (8009). An intravenous loading dose of folic acid, pyridoxine, and vitamin B12 followed by oral administration of folic acid 1.2 mg, pyridoxine 48 mg, and vitamin B12 60 mcg daily after bare metal coronary stenting also does not seem to reduce restenosis and might actually increase restenosis (12150,12151,34540). Due to the lack of evidence of benefit and potential for harm, this combination of vitamins should not be recommended for patients receiving coronary stents (12151). It is unclear if any effects are due to vitamin B12, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Anxiety. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B12 for anxiety and panic attacks, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B12 for these uses.
• Asthma. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B12 for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B12 for this condition.
• Atherosclerosis. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study in patients with intermediate risk for coronary heart disease shows that taking vitamin B12 100 mcg, aged garlic extract 250 mg, folic acid 300 mcg, vitamin B6 12.5 mg, and L-arginine 100 mg daily for 12 months reduces coronary artery calcium progression when compared with placebo (88385). It is unclear if this effect is due to vitamin B12, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if topical vitamin B12 reduces the severity of eczema. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a specific topical vitamin B12 0.07% cream (Regividerm) twice daily reduces the extent and severity of atopic dermatitis when compared with placebo (15765).
• Attention. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B12 for improving attention and focus, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B12 for this use.
• Cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 reduces overall cancer risk when used in combination with other B vitamins. Details: An ancillary clinical study in middle-aged and elderly adults with cardiovascular disease shows that taking a combination of vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) 0.02 mg, folic acid 0.56 mg, and vitamin B6 3 mg, with or without eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 400 mg plus docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 200 mg, for a median of 4.7 years does not reduce the risk of cancer when compared with placebo (90666). An additional secondary analysis of clinical research in patients recovering from stroke or transient ischemic attack shows that taking vitamin B12 500 mcg, folic acid 2 mg, and vitamin B6 25 mg daily for around 3.4 years does not reduce the risk of cancer when compared with placebo (90378). The validity of these findings is limited because the studies were not designed nor adequately powered to test for cancer risk.
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral vitamin B12, taken along with other B vitamins, does not seem to improve secondary prevention of death or myocardial infarction in patients with CVD. However, it might slightly reduce the risk of stroke. Details: Overall evidence from clinical research and meta-analyses shows that taking vitamin B12 in combination with folic acid and/or vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk for secondary death or myocardial infarction in patients with or at risk for CVD (11387,13482,34540,50423,83050,90379,97619). In fact, some research suggests that long-term supplementation with vitamin B6, folic acid, and vitamin B12 for secondary prevention increases the risk of CVD by 20% despite lowering homocysteine levels by 30% (13482). However, other research shows that taking vitamin B12 in combination with other B vitamins modestly reduces the risk of stroke, although results are conflicting (11387,13482,50423,83050,96150,96165,97619,107136). It is unclear which specific combination of B vitamins, if any, might be optimal for reducing stroke risk and which patients are most likely to benefit. In 2001, prior to the publication of the highest quality research on this topic, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368).
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 reduces cervical cancer risk. Details: Some epidemiological evidence has found that increasing vitamin B12 intake from dietary and supplement sources, along with folic acid, thiamine, and riboflavin, might decrease the risk of precancerous cervical lesions (11074). Also, an analysis of two case control studies has found that increased intake of vitamin B12 is associated with a 75% reduced odds of cervical cancer (34609).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients receiving chemotherapy shows that a combination of B vitamins that includes vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) 1000 mcg, taken daily starting one week prior to treatment and finishing 12 weeks after treatment is completed, does not prevent peripheral neuropathy when compared with placebo (96173).
• Child development. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for child development. Details: Population research has found that daily dietary intake of less than 2.26 mcg vitamin B12 in the third trimester of pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of poorer outcomes in the offspring for some measures of speech and mathematics ability, including vocabulary at 24 months, combining words at 38 months, speech intelligibility at 6 years, and math comprehension between ages 8-11 years, when compared with dietary intakes of at least 2.26 mcg daily. There was no association between prenatal vitamin B12 intake and reading or spelling abilities, vocabulary at other ages, or full-scale Intelligence Quotient (IQ) at ages 8 or 15 (107143). Furthermore, a very large clinical study in infants of pregnant adults, 71% of whom were deficient in vitamin B12 at baseline, shows that taking vitamin B12 50 mcg daily starting in early pregnancy (<15 weeks gestation) until 6 months postpartum does not improve neurodevelopment as measured by language, motor, socioemotional, or cognitive scores at 12 months old and may worsen early motor performance at 8-12 weeks when compared with placebo. However, the negative effects on motor performance resolved by 6 and 12 months of age (112431).
• Child growth. Oral vitamin B12 taken by pregnant adults does not seem to be beneficial for infant growth. Details: A very large clinical study in infants of pregnant adults, 71% of whom were deficient in vitamin B12 at baseline, shows that taking vitamin B12 50 mcg daily starting in early pregnancy (<15 weeks gestation) until 6 months postpartum does not improve the infant's linear growth, length, or weight at 12 months of age (112431).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 reduces the risk of COPD. Details: Clinical research in patients with COPD shows that taking vitamin B12 500 mg daily for 8 weeks modestly improves endurance on the cycle ergometer, but does not improve oxygen consumption, when compared with placebo (96172).
• Cognitive function. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in healthy, middle-aged adults shows that taking a combination product containing vitamin B12, other B vitamins, bacopa, and gingko biloba twice daily for 12 weeks does not improve measures of memory, attention, cognition, mood, or stress reactivity when compared with placebo (111334).
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 reduces colorectal cancer risk. Details: Some epidemiological evidence has found that increased dietary intake of vitamin B12 is associated with a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (90383). However, preliminary clinical research shows that taking vitamin B12 1 mg, folic acid 2.5 mg, and vitamin B6 50 mg daily for up to 7.3 years does not reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma in females at high risk for cardiovascular disease (90389). Furthermore, a secondary analysis of clinical research in elderly patients suggests that taking vitamin B12 500 mcg and folic acid 400 mcg daily for 2 years might increase the risk of colorectal cancer when compared with placebo (90393).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for patients with COVID-19. Details: A small observational study in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia has found that higher plasma vitamin B12 levels may be associated with an increased risk of transfer to intensive care or death than lower plasma levels. However, when multivariate regression was conducted, only patient age was associated with worsened outcomes. Additionally, the total study population was small, with only nine of 49 patients experiencing the worsened outcomes (107138).
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 reduces the risk of developing dementia. Details: A large cohort of Danish adults has found that vitamin B12 levels or intake does not seem to impact the risk of developing Alzheimer disease or other dementias (104922). However, vitamin B12 might be beneficial in specific patient populations. A small observational study in patients with Parkinson disease has found that higher vitamin B12 levels (648.5 ng/L) are associated with a lower risk of developing dementia when compared with lower vitamin B12 levels (452 ng/L) (103975). It is not yet known if supplementation with vitamin B12 reduces the risk for dementia in these patients.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for reducing depression risk. Details: A meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that the highest dietary intake of vitamin B12 is associated with a 14% reduced risk of depression. However, in a sub-analysis, this association was not significant in males (107133). In contrast, one epidemiological study in older males included in the analysis has found that daily dietary intake of at least 4.79 mcg vitamin B12 is linked with a 58% lower risk of depression when compared with daily intake of less than 3.16 mcg. In this study, this inverse association was not observed in females (96168). Other observational research has found that low-normal serum vitamin B12 levels are associated with a 3.8 times increased risk for depression during pregnancy when compared with normal vitamin B12 levels (102384). It is unclear if increased intake of vitamin B12 through the diet or supplements reduces the risk for depression or is beneficial for treating symptoms of depression in any population. However, a meta-analysis of clinical research in elderly populations shows that supplementation with vitamin B12 100-1000 mcg daily, usually in combination with folic acid 400-2000 mcg daily, does not reduce symptoms of depression. Most individuals in these studies were not specifically diagnosed with depression (107140).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 improves glycemic indices or prevents loss of skeletal muscle in patients with diabetes. Details: A small clinical study in patients with diabetes in India who are stabilized on metformin and/or a sulfonylurea shows that taking vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin) 500 mcg with or without folic acid 5 mg daily for 8 weeks seems to reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) by 1.3% to 1.5%, compared with a 0.3% increase with placebo (104917). This study is limited due its small sample size and lack of blinding. In elderly adults with type 2 diabetes, population research has found a lower dietary intake of vitamin B12 (average of 11.2 mcg daily) in individuals with a loss of skeletal muscle mass of at least 1.2%, compared with an average intake of 13.4 mcg daily in those with a skeletal muscle mass loss of less than 1.2%. However, further analysis determined that any relationship between vitamin B12 intake and loss of skeletal muscle mass was only significant in individuals with insufficient energy intake overall (107151).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Small clinical studies suggest that oral vitamin B12 may modestly improve pain in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy show that taking vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin) 1-1.5 mg for 4-12 months modestly improves pain when compared with baseline or placebo (82841,104923). Some research also shows that vitamin B12 may be beneficial in combination with other ingredients. Studies have evaluated products containing vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin or cyanocobalamin), benfotiamine, and vitamin B6 daily for 9-12 weeks (82931,82939); and vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin) 2 mg, folic acid (L-methylfolate) 3 mg, and vitamin B6 (pyridoxal-5'-phosphate) 35 mg (Metanx; Pamlab) daily for 24 weeks (90375).
• Diarrhea. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for reducing diarrhea in children. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children aged 6-30 months from low- and middle-income countries shows that taking vitamin B12 at twice the recommended dietary allowance, with or without folic acid, does not reduce the risk for diarrhea when compared with placebo (90391).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if intramuscular vitamin B12 is beneficial for improving well-being in those with fatigue or tiredness. Details: A small crossover trial in patients complaining of tiredness or fatigue shows that receiving intramuscular injections of vitamin B12 (hydroxocobalamin) 5 mg twice weekly for 2 weeks seems to improve general well-being and happiness, and has a trend toward improving fatigue, when compared with placebo (10127). The validity of this study is limited by a large drop-out rate and unstandardized outcome measures.
• Hearing loss. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with adenosine triphosphate; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small observational study in adults with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss has found that taking vitamin B12 1.5 mg with adenosine triphosphate 300 mg daily for 8-16 weeks is associated with modestly reduced hearing loss at 4-6 months after starting treatment when compared with taking the combination for less than 8 weeks (104924). This finding is limited due to its observational nature and lack of a control group.
• Hepatitis C. It is unclear if intramuscular vitamin B12 is beneficial for sustaining viral response in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection shows that intramuscular vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) 5000 mcg every 4 weeks along with standard care improves sustained viral response when compared with standard of care alone (90386).
• Hypertriglyceridemia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for reducing triglyceride levels. Details: Some evidence shows that taking vitamin B12 7.5 mcg with fish oil 5 grams might be superior to fish oil alone when used daily to reduce total serum cholesterol and triglycerides. This suggests vitamin B12 might have an independent effect in lowering serum cholesterol and triglycerides, but further investigation is needed to confirm this effect (8694).
• Hypotension. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for treating hypotension. Details: A meta-analysis of 3 observational studies in patients hospitalized with hypotension secondary to cardiac surgery vasoplegia suggests that administration of intravenous vitamin B12 (hydroxocobalamin) is associated with an 8 mmHg higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 1 hour but no change in vasopressor dosage at 1 hour or mortality rate when compared with methylene blue (112264). The validity of these findings is limited by the inclusion of only retrospective studies.
• Infant development. It is unclear if taking oral vitamin B12 during pregnancy is beneficial for improving infant development. Giving oral vitamin B12 to infants does not seem to be beneficial. Details: Clinical research shows that supplementation with vitamin B12 50 mcg daily from less than 14 weeks gestation until 6 weeks postpartum does not improve cognitive development in infants by 9 months of age when compared with placebo (96174). When these children were evaluated at 30 months of age, a very small benefit of vitamin B12 on expressive language was identified; however, there was no effect on cognition, receptive language, fine motor skills, or gross motor skills (100169). It is unknown whether a longer duration of postpartum supplementation or supplementation in specific populations might be beneficial. Vitamin B12 supplementation in infants has also been evaluated. A large clinical trial in marginally stunted Nepalese infants aged 6-11 months shows that giving vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) 2 mcg daily for 12 months reduces homocysteine levels, but does not improve motor or cognitive development, when compared with placebo (104926).
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B12 for IBD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B12 for this condition.
• Lung cancer. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: The association between vitamin B12 and lung cancer is unclear. Some population research found no relationship between blood levels of vitamin B12 and lung cancer (9454). However, other observational research involving over 5,000 case-control pairs found that higher vitamin B12 levels are linked with an increased risk for lung cancer (102383). It is unclear if increased intake of vitamin B12, either through the diet or supplementation, directly affects the risk of lung cancer.
• Male infertility. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A retrospective study in adult males with idiopathic and varicocele-related infertility suggests that taking a combination product containing vitamin B12 1.5 mcg, L-carnitine, acetyl L-carnitine, citric acid, selenium, coenzyme Q10, vitamin C, zinc, and folic acid (Proxeed Plus) twice daily for 6 months is associated with improvements in ejaculate volume, sperm count, sperm concentration, total motility, and progressive motility in patients with idiopathic infertility when compared to baseline. However, improvement in sperm morphology was lacking. Furthermore, patients with more severe varicocele seem to benefit most, especially with regard to progressive motility (111296). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of comparator group. Further, it is unclear if these effects are due to vitamin B12, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Mastalgia. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with mastalgia shows that taking a combination of vitamin B12 as methylcobalamin 100 mg, gamma-linolenic acid, and vitamin C daily for 12 weeks does not improve the proportion of patients with minimal or no pain when compared with placebo (111059).
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B12 for MS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B12 for this condition.
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: A small clinical study in adults with NAFLD shows that taking vitamin B12 1000 mcg daily for 12 weeks reduces serum levels of homocysteine but has no effect on serum aminotransferases, measures of steatosis, fibrosis scores, fasting blood glucose, serum insulin, measures of insulin resistance, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol when compared with placebo (111555).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for reducing the risk of pancreatic cancer. Details: Most population research has found that increased intake of vitamin B12, as a supplement or in the diet, is not associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer (9327,104927). However, a small, retrospective population study in which smoking and non-smoking adults recalled past eating habits found that increased dietary intake of vitamin B12 is associated with a 33% reduction in pancreatic cancer risk (97976). These conflicting findings may be related to study methodology, as well as the age, gender, or smoking status of the included patients.
• Periodontitis. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B12 for periodontitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B12 for this condition.
• Peripheral neuropathy. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific product containing vitamin B12 3 mcg, folic acid 400 mcg, and uridine monophosphate 50 mg (Keltican) daily for 60 days reduces pain by 44% and decreases analgesic use by over 75% when compared to baseline in patients with peripheral neuropathy, including those with lumbar/lumbosacral radiculopathy, sciatic pain, and cervical radiculopathy (90384). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group. Furthermore, it is unclear if the benefits are due to vitamin B12, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Psoriasis. Topical vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that a specific cream containing vitamin B12 and avocado oil (Regividerm, Regeneratio Pharma AG) reduces symptoms of psoriasis as effectively as calcipotriol ointment (Psorcutan) after 12 weeks of therapy. The vitamin B12 combination cream also causes less irritation than calcipotriol (14909). It is unclear if the benefits are due to vitamin B12, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Respiratory tract infections. A small study suggests that oral vitamin B12 does not reduce the rate of respiratory tract infections in children. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children aged 6-30 months from low-and middle-income countries suggests that taking vitamin B12 at twice the recommended dietary allowance with or without folic acid does not reduce the risk for lower respiratory tract infections when compared with placebo (90391).
• Schizophrenia. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of vitamin B12 400 mcg and folic acid 2 mg daily for 16 weeks improves negative symptoms when compared with placebo in patients with schizophrenia who have persistent symptoms and a specific genetic variant of the folate transporter gene FOLHI. This variant normally results in reduced folate absorption. However, in patients without this genetic variant, folate is not beneficial with respect to negative symptom improvement (90387).
• Sickle cell disease. Oral vitamin B12 has only been evaluated in combination with other B vitamins; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with sickle cell disease shows that taking vitamin B12 4.2-6 mcg, folic acid 700 mcg, and vitamin B6 4.2-6 mg daily might lower homocysteine levels. However, it is unknown if this will reduce the risk of endothelial damage in these patients (9324).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral vitamin B12, either alone or with other B vitamins, is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Epidemiological research has found that people with a higher intake of vitamin B12 from dietary sources do not have a reduced risk of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (14316). A number of clinical studies and meta-analyses show that supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12, alone or in combination, does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or impaired kidney function (11387,13482,50420,50423,83050,90379,90380,96150). However, a more recent meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials including over 44,000 patients shows that B vitamin supplementation modestly reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo in patients at risk or with a history of CVD (97619). This meta-analysis differed from some of the earlier analyses due to the inclusion of several additional clinical trials. Also, a meta-analysis in adults with a history of stroke shows that B vitamin supplementation modestly reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% and vascular death by 11% when compared with placebo (107136). In 2001, prior to the publication of the highest quality research on this topic, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368). Unfortunately, even after the publication of higher quality research, it is still unclear which specific combination of B vitamins is optimal and which patients are most likely to benefit. One network meta-analysis suggests that a combination of folic acid and vitamin B6 lowers the risk of stroke more effectively than B vitamin mixtures that include vitamin B12 (96165). However, this analysis is limited because it didn't account for dosing. Another meta-analysis suggests that exposure to low, but not high, amounts of vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) seems to reduce stroke risk (96150).
• Tinnitus. It is unclear if intramuscular vitamin B12 is beneficial in patients with tinnitus. Details: A small clinical study shows that intramuscular vitamin B12 2500 mcg weekly for 6 weeks reduces tinnitus severity by 22% when compared to baseline in patients with chronic tinnitus and vitamin B12 deficiency, but not in patients with normal levels of vitamin B12. Vitamin B12 does not improve pitch or volume in either group of patients (96170). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Venous thromboembolism (VTE). It is unclear if oral vitamin B12 is beneficial for preventing VTE. Details: Epidemiological research has found that low levels of vitamin B12 are associated with an increased risk for VTE. However, clinical trials evaluating the use of B vitamins for prevention of VTE have shown conflicting results (90398). More evidence is needed to rate vitamin B12 for these uses.

(Read more about VITAMIN B12)

EFFECTIVE

• Pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy. Intravenous vitamin B6 is effective for controlling pyridoxine-dependent seizures. Details: Pyridoxine-dependent seizures are a rare type of refractory seizures in neonates that do not respond to anticonvulsant drugs. These seizures are typically controlled within minutes of intravenous administration of pyridoxine, a form of vitamin B6. Pyridoxine-dependent seizures can be due to genetic (autosomal recessive) pyridoxine dependency, or more commonly, a result of the use of high-dose pyridoxine during pregnancy (8197,8198).
• Sideroblastic anemia. Oral vitamin B6 is effective for treating hereditary sideroblastic anemia. Details: Taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) orally is effective for treating hereditary sideroblastic anemia (15,9518). Taking the active form of vitamin B6 (pyridoxal-5'-phosphate) also seems to be effective in cases in which the patient does not respond to pyridoxine (93049).
• Vitamin B6 deficiency. Oral vitamin B6 is effective for preventing and treating vitamin B6 deficiency. Details: Taking oral vitamin B6 can prevent and treat vitamin B6 deficiency (15).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Hyperhomocysteinemia. Taking vitamin B6 orally, alone or in combination with folic acid, is effective for reducing hyperhomocysteinemia. Details: Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) seems to lower homocysteine concentrations when folic acid and vitamin B12 are at physiologic levels or when given with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplements (9451,83042,107136). A combination of vitamin B6 100 mg and folic acid 0.5 mg daily seems to lower homocysteine levels by about 35% and is recommended for people with postprandial hyperhomocysteinemia (1489,9406). Other research shows that taking pyridoxine 50-200 mg daily reduces postprandial homocysteine levels by 32% to 35% (9406,10350). Pyridoxine also seems to reduce homocysteine levels in patients with kidney failure, kidney transplant patients (1489,6884,9414,9415), or patients who receive general anesthesia with nitrous oxide (9481). However, some research in healthy adults suggests that adding pyridoxine to folic acid might not provide any additional benefit over folic acid alone (9400,9405,9409,50145). Hyperhomocysteinemia is considered by some to be an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis, recurrent thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke (1899,3323,9402,9405,9408,9409). However, elevated homocysteine levels may be a marker, as opposed to a cause, of vascular disease (11387,11388). A 5 µmol/L increase in plasma homocysteine increases the risk of cerebrovascular disease by 50% and the odds of coronary heart disease by 60% and 80% in males and females, respectively (9407,9411). However, it is not clear if reducing homocysteine levels results in reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (1489,6883,6884,9308,9400,9405,9409). Folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 supplementation can reduce total homocysteine from 13.4 to 11 µmol/L. However, this reduction does not seem to help with secondary prevention of death or myocardial infarction, and some research even suggests an increase in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk (11387,13482,50423,83050,97619). There is also debate about whether supplementation with homocysteine-lowering B vitamins can reduce the risk of stroke. A number of large clinical studies and meta-analyses show that supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12, alone or in combination, does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with CVD or impaired renal function (11387,13482,50423,83050,96150). However, a more recent meta-analysis shows that B vitamin supplementation modestly reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo in patients at risk for or with a history of CVD (97619). Also, a meta-analysis in patients with a history of stroke shows that B vitamin supplementation modestly reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% and the risk of vascular death by 11% when compared with placebo (107136).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for patients with antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Details: Clinical research in male patients with hyperprolactinemia who are on a consistent antipsychotic dose shows that taking vitamin B6 300 mg twice daily for 16 weeks reduces serum prolactin levels by 68%, compared with 37% in patients taking aripiprazole 5 mg twice daily. Also, 67% of patients taking vitamin B6 had prolactin levels less than 40 mcg/mL versus 2% of those taking aripiprazole (107128).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Oral vitamin B6 seems to decrease urinary oxalate levels and decrease the risk of kidney stone formation in some patients. Details: There is some evidence that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) orally, alone or in combination with magnesium, can decrease urinary oxalate levels in people with type I primary hyperoxaluria, a hereditary disorder (1201,6437,6438,6439,6440,8548,8549,8550). Additionally, a small clinical study in this population suggests that intravenous pyridoxine hydrochloride can reduce urinary oxalate by 25.5% when compared to baseline (90796). In patients with idiopathic hyperoxaluria, taking a combination of pyridoxine 25mg and magnesium oxide 400 mg for 3 months decreases urinary oxalate by approximately 16%, with 68% of patients experiencing a reduction. However, supplementation is less effective than following a low-oxalate diet, which reduces urinary oxalate in 91% of patients by an average of 31% (107127). There is also preliminary evidence that higher pyridoxine intake in females with no history of kidney stones is associated with decreased risk of kidney stone formation (6441), but this association has not been found in males (6442).
• Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oral vitamin B6 may reduce nausea and vomiting in some pregnant patients and is sometimes used in combination with doxylamine. Details: While some conflicting evidence exists, most small clinical studies suggest that oral vitamin B6 is effective for improving nausea and vomiting associated with pregnancy when compared with baseline or placebo. However, vitamin B6 may not be as effective as ginger (110459). Two small clinical studies show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 25 mg every 8 hours for 3-4 days decreases pregnancy-induced nausea severity and vomiting incidence when compared with placebo (6168,16306). A larger clinical trial shows that taking lower doses of vitamin B6, 10 mg every 8 hours over 5 days, improves pregnancy-induced nausea, but not vomiting, when compared with placebo (6167). A small clinical study in patients with mild to moderate nausea and vomiting shows that taking a higher dose of 40 mg twice daily for 4 days is more effective than placebo, but no better than ginger 500 mg twice daily (99404). The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) considers vitamin B6 at a dose of 10-25 mg 3 to 4 times daily a first-line treatment for pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting due to its benign safety profile (111601). However, it is not effective for all patients, such as those with hyperemesis gravidarum, a severe form of pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Adding vitamin B6 20 mg three times daily for 2 weeks to intravenous rehydration, metoclopramide, and thiamine seems to be no more effective than placebo for reducing vomiting in hyperemesis gravidarum (99405). Vitamin B6 is also sometimes used in combination with doxylamine. In fact, a combination of vitamin B6 plus doxylamine (Diclegis or Bonjesta, Duchesnay Inc., and various generics) has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a prescription product111601). ACOG recommends vitamin B6 in combination with doxylamine as another first-line treatment option (111601). However, the clinical trial used to obtain FDA approval has some methodological problems, and the significance of the results has been questioned. The improvement in symptom scores seen with Diclegis was less than one point on a 13-point scale, which is unlikely to be clinically significant (97998). Also, some clinical research shows that taking pyridoxine 25 mg and doxylamine 12.5 mg is less effective than ondansetron 4 mg when taken every 8 hours for 5 days. Only 41% of the patients using pyridoxine and doxylamine had a clinically significant reduction in nausea, compared to 92% of patients using ondansetron (90797). The combination of vitamin B6 and doxylamine is also studied with acupuncture. A large clinical study in patients with moderate to severe pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting conducted in China shows that taking vitamin B6-doxylamine (Diclegis, Duchesnay, Inc) 20 to 40 mg each at bedtime for 14 days in combination with daily acupuncture modestly improves patient-reported nausea and vomiting scores when compared with either intervention alone (111820). However, it is unclear whether this improvement is clinically significant.
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Oral vitamin B6 seems to reduce PMS symptoms. Details: There is some evidence that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) orally can improve symptoms of PMS such as breast pain or tenderness (mastalgia) and depression in some patients. Pyridoxine in doses of at least 50 mg daily, plus magnesium oxide 200 mg daily, seems to relieve PMS-related anxiety and other symptoms (8555,39007,82962). Although some clinicians advocate doses of pyridoxine 200-500 mg daily for PMS, doses of 50-100 mg daily seem to work just as well. There is no apparent dose-response curve for PMS, so the lowest effective dose should be used. Higher doses might increase the risk of side effects (3093).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Age-related cognitive decline. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to slow age-related cognitive decline. Details: One clinical trial in elderly people with memory complaints shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 0.8 mg, vitamin B12 0.5 mg, and vitamin B6 (form not specified) 20 mg daily for 24 months reduces cerebral atrophy in the gray matter regions associated with Alzheimer disease by up to seven-fold when compared with placebo. However, this protection does not occur in patients with the lowest average blood levels of homocysteine (90374). Furthermore, other clinical research shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 3-75 mg daily in combination with folic acid and vitamin B12 does not improve cognitive function in elderly adults (14392,50225,50510).
• Alzheimer disease. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to improve cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer disease when used in combination with other B vitamins. Also, oral vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of developing this condition. Details: Clinical research in patients with probable Alzheimer disease taking routine medications shows that taking vitamin B6 25 mg with folic acid 5 mg and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for 18 months does not have a beneficial effect on cognitive function or the severity of disease when compared with placebo. In this study, all patients were consuming a folate-fortified diet (50319). Also, population research in elderly adults has found that a high intake of vitamin B6 from dietary or supplemental sources is not associated with a decreased risk of Alzheimer disease when compared to lower vitamin B6 intake (13165,15270).
• Carpal tunnel syndrome. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Details: Most research shows that people with carpal tunnel syndrome are not generally deficient in vitamin B6 and do not benefit from taking vitamin B6 supplements (8203,8937,9448,9450,9478,9482). Although early studies by a single group of researchers, as well as anecdotal reports, suggest that taking vitamin B6 may relieve carpal tunnel symptoms, more reliable research has not supported these findings (8202,9445,9447,9449,9483,15955,83086). Vitamin B6 has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome shows that taking a combination product containing vitamin B6, alpha-lipoic acid, acetyl-L-carnitine, phosphatidylserine, turmeric, and vitamins C, E, B1, B2, and B12 twice daily for 60 days reduces symptom severity and pain but does not improve measures of hand and wrist function when compared with a control (111702). The dose of vitamin B6 was not provided. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of blinding and placebo. Additionally, it is unclear if the effects are due to vitamin B6, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Cataracts. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to slow cataract development. Details: Clinical research in females with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or at increased risk of CVD shows that taking a combination of folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 (form not specified) 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for an average of 7.3 years does not reduce the risk of cataracts when compared with placebo. Furthermore, the risk of cataract extraction was increased by 28% (96149).
• Chemotherapy-induced acral erythema. While some conflicting evidence exists, most research suggests that oral or topical vitamin B6 does not seem to prevent or reduce the severity of acral erythema induced by chemotherapy. Details: A meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials and 4 observational studies shows that taking vitamin B6 60-500 mg daily for up to 8 chemotherapy cycles does not prevent chemotherapy-induced acral erythema or reduce the incidence of severe cases when compared with control. Most studies used capecitabine chemotherapy alone or in combination, and one study used pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; however, no subgroup analysis was conducted to differentiate chemotherapy regimens. Results did not seem to vary based on study location, study design, or vitamin B6 dose (104930). However, a more recent preliminary clinical study in patients receiving doxorubicin for multiple myeloma shows that taking vitamin B6 100 mg on the first day of chemotherapy then twice daily for 7 days with each cycle reduces the risk of developing acral erythema by 72%, but does not improve the severity of acral erythema, when compared with no vitamin B6 supplementation (110458). Also, one small, low-quality clinical study suggests that taking vitamin B6 400 mg daily reduces the risk of moderate or severe chemotherapy-induced acral erythema when compared with vitamin B6 200 mg daily; however, the higher dose also seems to be associated with worsened tumor response and increased treatment failure (97620). Topical vitamin B6 has also failed to show benefit. A small clinical study in patients with acral erythema from capecitabine or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin shows that applying vitamin B6 1% cream to affected areas three times daily for 6 weeks does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (104929).
• Colorectal adenoma. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of developing colorectal adenomas. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg, daily for up to 9.2 years does not reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma in females at high risk of cardiovascular disease when compared with placebo (90389).
• Eclampsia. Oral or intramuscular vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of eclampsia. Details: Meta-analyses of limited clinical research in pregnant patients show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), either as 25 mg daily or a single dose of 100 mg orally or intramuscularly, does not reduce the risk of eclampsia when compared with control (83046,96166).
• Osteoporosis. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Details: Clinical research in patients with cerebrovascular disease shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 2 mg, vitamin B6 (form not specified) 25 mg, and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily for up to 10.5 years does not prevent osteoporotic fractures when compared with placebo (90377). Furthermore, a secondary analysis of two large studies in patients with cardiovascular disease has found that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 40 mg daily in addition to folic acid and vitamin B12 for 1-3 years is associated with a 42% increased risk of hip fracture over an 11-year period when compared with only folic acid and vitamin B12 (96163). This finding is limited because these studies were not designed to assess the effects of vitamin B6 on fracture risk and the analyses were not adjusted for baseline bone health or fall risk.
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral or intramuscular vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia. Details: Meta-analyses of limited clinical research in pregnant patients show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), either as 25 mg daily or a single dose of 100 mg orally or intramuscularly, does not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia when compared with placebo (83046,96166).
• Preterm labor. Oral or intramuscular vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of preterm labor. Details: Meta-analyses of limited clinical research in pregnant patients shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), either as 25 mg daily or a single dose of 100 mg orally or intramuscularly, does not reduce the risk of preterm labor when compared with placebo (83046,96166).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults and children with inflammatory acne shows that taking 1-4 tablets of a specific product (NicAzel, Elorac Inc.) containing vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), nicotinamide, azelaic acid, zinc, copper, and folic acid for 8 weeks reduces inflammatory lesions and improves appearance in 88% and 81% of patients, respectively, when compared to baseline (90800). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large-scale clinical study shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 50 mg, vitamin B12 1000 mcg, and folic acid 2.5 mg daily reduces the risk for AMD in females over 40 years of age with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or with risk factors for CVD. Those who took this combination for an average of 7.3 years had a 34% reduced risk of developing AMD and a 41% reduced risk of visually significant AMD when compared with placebo (14620). It is unclear if this effect is due to vitamin B6, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Angioplasty. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Some evidence suggests that vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 10 mg, folic acid 1 mg, and vitamin B12 400 mcg daily can decrease the rate of restenosis in patients treated with balloon angioplasty (8009,9412). However, this combination does not seem to be as effective for reducing restenosis in patients after coronary stenting (8009). An intravenous loading dose of folic acid, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), and vitamin B12 followed by oral administration of folic acid 1.2 mcg, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 48 mg, and vitamin B12 60 mcg daily after bare metal coronary stenting also does not seem to reduce restenosis and might actually increase restenosis (12150,12151). Due to the lack of evidence of benefit and potential for harm, this combination of vitamins should not be recommended for patients receiving coronary stents (12151). It is unclear if any effects are due to vitamin B6, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Antipsychotic-induced metabolic side effects. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6, as an adjunct to progesterone, is beneficial in patients with antipsychotic-induced amenorrhea. Details: A small clinical study in females with antipsychotic-induced amenorrhea shows that taking vitamin B6 80 mg three times daily for 1 month plus intramuscular progesterone daily for 5 days increases levels of estradiol and follicle stimulating hormone, reduces prolactin levels, and increases the rate of clinical efficacy, defined as the normalization of menstruation and improvement in endocrine indicators, by 14% when compared with progesterone alone (110457).
• Anxiety. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with anxiety. Details: Clinical research in college students shows that taking vitamin B6 100 mg daily for one month does not reduce anxiety scores when compared with placebo (110453). However, because a diagnosis of anxiety was not a requirement for study participation, it is unclear if these findings can be generalized to patients diagnosed with anxiety.
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with asthma. Details: Preliminary clinical studies show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 200-300 mg daily may improve symptoms of asthma in some patients, but not others, when compared with placebo (7064,7065). Studies have yielded conflicting results, with some research suggesting that it may only be beneficial in children with severe asthma (7065). Additionally, some research suggests that theophylline may lower vitamin B6 levels, although it is unclear if vitamin B6 supplementation is beneficial (4522,7066,9503).
• Atherosclerosis. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with intermediate risk for coronary heart disease shows that taking a specific supplement (Kyolic, Total Heart Health, Formula 108, Wakunga) containing vitamin B6 12.5 mg, aged garlic extract 250 mg, vitamin B12 100 mcg, folic acid 300 mcg, and L-arginine 100 mg daily for 12 months reduces coronary artery calcium progression when compared with placebo (88385). It is unclear if this effect is due to vitamin B6, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with eczema. Details: A small clinical study in children with eczema shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) 50 mg daily for 4 weeks does not reduce symptoms such as redness and itchiness when compared with placebo (83090).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for ADHD. Details: A small crossover study in children with ADHD shows that taking vitamin B6 600 mg, niacinamide and ascorbic acid 3 grams, and calcium pantothenate 1.2 grams daily for 6 weeks does not improve behavior scores when compared with placebo (9957).
• Autism spectrum disorder. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B6 for autism, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B6 for this condition.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with type 1 bipolar disorder who are taking lithium and experiencing an acute episode of mania shows that taking vitamin B6 80 mg daily for 8 weeks does not improve cognitive function or the severity of mania when compared with placebo. Cognitive function was reduced in patients taking vitamin B6; any effect on sleep was unclear (107132).
• Cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces overall cancer risk. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin B6 is associated with a 22% reduced risk of cancer, including esophageal, pancreatic, gastric, colorectal, and breast cancer. However, when dietary and supplemental vitamin B6 intake is considered, the inverse association between vitamin B6 and cancer risk is weaker and limited to fewer tumor sites. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of 9 clinical studies shows that taking vitamin B6 3-100 mg orally daily for 2-7.3 years, in combination with vitamin B12 and folate, does not reduce the risk of cancer in patients with cardiovascular disease or kidney failure (96164).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral vitamin B6, taken along with other B vitamins, does not seem to improve secondary prevention of death or myocardial infarction in patients with CVD. However, it might slightly lower the risk of stroke. Details: Overall evidence from clinical research and meta-analyses shows that taking vitamin B6 in combination with folic acid and/or vitamin B12 does not seem to help with secondary prevention of death or myocardial infarction in patients with or at risk for CVD (11387,13482,34540,50423,83050,90379,97619). In fact, some research suggests that long-term supplementation with vitamin B6, folic acid, and vitamin B12 for secondary prevention increases the risk of CVD by 20% despite lowering homocysteine levels by 30% (13482). However, some research shows that taking vitamin B6 in combination with other B vitamins modestly reduces the risk of stroke, although results are conflicting (11387,13482,50423,83050,96150,96165,97619,107136). Additionally, it is unclear which specific combination of B vitamins is optimal for reducing stroke risk and which patients are most likely to benefit. In 2001, prior to the publication of the highest quality research on this topic, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368).
• Cognitive function. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in healthy adults aged 40-65 years shows that taking a supplement containing vitamin B6, ginkgo leaf, bacopa, and other B vitamins twice daily for 12 weeks does not improve memory or attention when compared with placebo (111334).
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces the risk of colorectal cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of observational studies suggests that the highest dietary intake of vitamin B6 is associated with a 20% reduced risk of colorectal cancer when compared with the lowest dietary intake. However, this association was not shown in subgroup analyses of studies conducted in Australia, Europe, or North America (111600). The validity of this analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies.
• Dental caries. There is limited evidence on the oral use of vitamin B6 for dental decay during pregnancy. Details: Meta-analyses of limited clinical research show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), 25 mg daily or a single dose of 100 mg orally or intramuscularly, may reduce the risk of dental decay during pregnancy when compared with placebo (83046,96166).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces the risk of developing depression or improves symptoms of depression. Details: Clinical research in healthy college students shows that taking vitamin B6 100 mg daily for one month does not reduce depression scores when compared with placebo (1104453). However, because a diagnosis of depression was not a requirement for study participation, it is unclear if these findings can be generalized to patients diagnosed with depression. Whether vitamin B6 reduces the risk of developing depression is also unclear. A meta-analysis of population research has found that the highest dietary intake of vitamin B6 is associated with a 19% lower risk of depression when compared with the lowest intake. However, sub-analyses suggest that this association is only relevant in females and not males (107133). In one individual population study in community dwelling older adults included in the analysis, the consumption of at least 1.71 mg of vitamin B6 daily from food was associated with a 43% reduction in the likelihood of becoming depressed when compared with the consumption of 1.33 mg or less daily in females. However, there was no association between vitamin B6 levels and risk of depression in males, and the finding in females was no longer significant when adjusted for total energy intake, since foods rich in vitamin B6 are energy-dense (96168). Another observational longitudinal study in healthy adults starting oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel has found that taking vitamin B6 25 mg daily for 6-12 months is associated with a 40% lower risk of depression when compared with no supplementation (90789). Most available studies are cross-sectional in nature, making any conclusions related to causation difficult.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with type 2 diabetes or gestational diabetes. Details: Observational research in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes has found that dietary intake of vitamin B6 in the highest quartile is associated with 53% lower odds of developing cardiovascular disease, defined as a non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina, when compared with vitamin B6 intake in the lowest quartile (110452). Small clinical studies in patients with gestational diabetes and vitamin B6 deficiency shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 100 mg daily for 2 weeks improves glucose tolerance and blood glucose levels when compared with baseline (82967,83088). However, there is concern that these findings were confounded by dietary alterations. This benefit was not observed in a subsequent small case series in patients with gestational diabetes (22380).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research suggests that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid (L-methylfolate), vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin), and vitamin B6 (pyridoxal-5'-phosphate) for 24 weeks does not improve neural dysfunction based on vibration perception when compared with placebo in patients with diabetic neuropathy. However, taking this combination appears to modestly improve neuropathy symptoms and quality of life related to mental functioning when compared with placebo (90375).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with dysmenorrhea. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking vitamin B6 (form not specified) 200 mg daily reduces pain associated with dysmenorrhea when compared with placebo. However, taking vitamin B6 in combination with magnesium does not reduce pain when compared with placebo (77388).
• Fibromyalgia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with fibromyalgia. Details: A small clinical study in patients with fibromyalgia shows that taking vitamin B6 80 mg daily for 8 weeks does not improve pain, disease severity, anxiety, depression, or quality of life when compared with placebo (110454).
• Gastroenteritis-associated nausea and vomiting. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in children with gastroenteritis. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 6 months to 12 years with acute viral gastroenteritis shows that taking vitamin B6 (form not specified) does not improve symptoms of dehydration or the frequency of vomiting when compared with placebo (90793).
• Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for Helicobacter pylori. Details: A large clinical study in adults with Helicobacter pylori infection shows that taking vitamin B6 20 mg twice daily for 2 weeks alongside conventional quadruple therapy does not improve eradication rates when compared with a control group not receiving vitamin B6 (113551). Conventional therapy consisted of a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, minocycline, and metronidazole. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of placebo and inadequate blinding.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces blood pressure. Details: One small clinical study in patients with essential hypertension shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) 5 mg/kg daily for 4 weeks can reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure when compared with baseline (83091). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Hypertriglyceridemia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces triglyceride levels. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that vitamin B6 (form not specified) 50 mg daily for 12 weeks does not reduce triglyceride levels in people with hypertriglyceridemia when compared with placebo. However, vitamin B6 appears to decrease total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by approximately 9% in these patients (59028).
• Infertility. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B6 for infertility, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B6 for this condition.
• Insomnia. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in healthy adults with self-reported sleep difficulty shows that taking a specific product (LZ Complex3, Sanofi Consumer Healthcare Pty Ltd.) containing vitamin B6, zizyphus extract, hops extract, hydrolyzed milk protein (Lactium), and magnesium oxide nightly, 30 minutes before bed, for 2 weeks does not improve sleep quality, daytime functioning, or physical fatigue when compared with placebo. However, due to the large improvement seen in both the treatment and placebo groups, the effectiveness of this product is unclear (95971).
• Isoniazid-induced neuropathy. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 prevents the development of neuropathy in patients taking isoniazid. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients taking isoniazid for tuberculosis shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 6 mg daily reduces the development of neuropathy when compared with control (83068).
• Lactation. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 helps to suppress postpartum lactation. Details: A meta-analysis of two small clinical trials shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 400-600 mg daily for 6-7 days postpartum does not suppress lactation when compared with no treatment (83047).
• Levetiracetam-induced side effects. While some conflicting evidence exists, several small, low-quality studies suggest that oral vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) may reduce some neuropsychiatric adverse effects related to the use of levetiracetam. Details: In an analysis of case reports, retrospective studies, and a single low-quality prospective study, improvement in levetiracetam-associated neuropsychiatric symptoms occurred in approximately 73% of patients taking pyridoxine (107137). A more recent preliminary clinical trial in children ages 1-17 years shows that taking pyridoxine 10 or 15 mg/kg daily as needed based on symptoms improves behavioral side effects associated with levetiracetam by a small amount when compared with low-dose pyridoxine 0.5 mg/kg daily used as placebo (107124). Also, observational research in children ages 9 months to 14 years has found that taking vitamin B6 is associated with improved behavior and a 44% lower risk of levetiracetam discontinuation when compared with no vitamin B6 supplementation (110455). Some observational research in adults with levetiracetam-associated irritability has found that taking vitamin B6 is associated with an improvement in irritability in 45% of patients when compared to baseline (107129). However, a small clinical trial in adults with epilepsy shows that taking pyridoxine 40 mg daily for 3 weeks does not improve levetiracetam-related psychiatric adverse effects when compared with placebo (110456). This study may have been underpowered to detect differences between groups. Pyridoxine doses used in the studies above have ranged from 50-400 mg daily in children and 40-600 mg daily in adults (107124,107129,107137,110456).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if dietary or oral vitamin B6 reduces lung cancer risk. Details: Epidemiological research has found that higher serum levels of vitamin B6 in male smokers is associated with a lower risk of lung cancer (9454). Also, people with blood levels of vitamin B6 in the top quartile have a modestly lower risk of lung cancer when compared with those whose levels are in the lowest quartile. The association is stronger for males and for people who have smoked (97999). However, other epidemiological research found that increased dietary intake of vitamin B6 is not associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer (96164).
• Menopausal symptoms. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B6 for menopausal symptoms, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B6 for this condition.
• Motion sickness. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B6 for motion sickness, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B6 for this condition.
• Nausea and vomiting. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for nausea and vomiting in patients taking oral contraceptives or antibiotics for Helicobacter pylori. Details: A large clinical study in adults with Helicobacter pylori infection shows that taking vitamin B6 20 mg twice daily for 2 weeks alongside conventional quadruple therapy reduces the incidence and severity of gastrointestinal adverse effects when compared with a control group not receiving vitamin B6 (113551). Conventional therapy consisted of a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, minocycline, and metronidazole. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of placebo and inadequate blinding. An observational longitudinal study in healthy females taking oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel has found that taking vitamin B6 25 mg daily for 6-12 months is associated with a 43% reduced risk of nausea when compared with no supplementation (90789).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 for patients with NAFLD. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with NAFLD shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 30 mg three times daily for 12 weeks does not reduce levels of liver transaminases or plasma lipids when compared with baseline. However, hepatic fat accumulation was modestly reduced (107130). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 in beneficial in overweight or obese individuals. Details: A small clinical trial in females with a body mass index (BMI) of at least 25 kg/m² shows that taking vitamin B6 as pyridoxine 80 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces fat mass and improves insulin resistance and triglyceride levels by a small amount when compared with placebo. Although some other anthropometric and metabolic indices were improved when compared with baseline, there was no effect of pyridoxine on body weight, visceral adiposity, or other endpoints when compared with placebo (107131).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces the risk of overall mortality. Details: Observational research in US adults has found that dietary intake of vitamin B6 in the highest quintile is associated with a 12% to 21% lower risk of all-cause mortality and a 31% to 44% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality when compared with the lowest quintile of dietary vitamin B6 intake (110451).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer. Details: Observational research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin B6 is associated with a 37% lower risk of developing pancreatic cancer when compared with lower intake (104927).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with postpartum depression. Details: Preliminary clinical research in individuals considered at increased risk for postpartum depression, but without clinical depression, shows that taking vitamin B6 80 mg daily from the 28th week of pregnancy until birth, and then 40 mg daily for one month, reduces symptoms of depression 1.5 months after birth when compared with baseline (measured during the third trimester) and when compared with placebo. However, it is unclear if any of the patients included in the study developed postpartum depression, as there were no changes in overall symptoms in patients taking placebo (107126).
• Proton pump inhibitor-induced gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for proton pump inhibitor-induced GI symptoms. Details: A large clinical study in adults with Helicobacter pylori infection shows that taking vitamin B6 20 mg twice daily for 2 weeks alongside conventional quadruple therapy reduces the incidence and severity of gastrointestinal adverse effects when compared with a control group not receiving vitamin B6 (113551). Conventional therapy consisted of a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, minocycline, and metronidazole. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of placebo and inadequate blinding.
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with RLS. Details: A small clinical study in adults with RLS who are beginning treatment with pramipexole shows that also taking vitamin B6 40 mg daily for 2 months moderately improves RLS scores and sleep quality scores when compared with pramipexole and placebo (110052).
• Schizophrenia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Details: Clinical research in male patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia who are on a consistent antipsychotic dose shows that adding vitamin B6 300 mg twice daily for 16 weeks modestly improves psychotic symptoms and some measures of cognitive performance when compared with adding aripiprazole 5 mg twice daily (107128). More research is needed to determine if these benefits are clinically relevant.
• Seizures. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for preventing seizures in patients with glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) deficiency. Details: Observational case series in a small number of children and young adults with GPI deficiency has found that taking vitamin B6 20-30 mg/kg daily for 3-12 months is associated with some reduction in seizure frequency in 9 of 13 patients. However, no patient reached seizure freedom (107125,107135). In one case series, treatment for 12 months was associated with modest developmental improvements in almost all patients (107135). The study patient populations were slightly different in terms of age and underlying genetic causes for GPI deficiency.
• Sickle cell disease. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other B vitamins; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with sickle cell disease shows that taking vitamin B6 4.2-6 mg, vitamin B12 4.2-6 mcg, and folic acid 700 mcg daily might lower homocysteine levels. However, it is unknown if this will reduce the risk of endothelial damage in these patients (9324).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6, either alone or with other B vitamins, is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: There is some debate about whether supplementation with homocysteine-lowering B vitamins, including vitamin B6, can reduce the risk of stroke. A number of clinical studies and meta-analyses show that supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12, alone or in combination, does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or impaired kidney function (11387,13482,50423,83050,96150). However, a more recent meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials, including over 44,000 patients at risk for or with a history of CVD, shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo (97619). This meta-analysis differed from some of the earlier analyses due to the inclusion of several additional clinical trials. Also, another meta-analysis of three clinical trials including 9900 patients with a history of stroke shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% when compared with placebo, although this finding was determined to have a low level of certainty. Based on two clinical trials, there was also a 17% reduced risk of vascular death and an 11% reduction in the combined risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death (107136). In 2001, prior to the publication of the highest quality research on this topic, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368). Unfortunately, even after the publication of higher quality research, it is still unclear which specific combination of B vitamins is optimal and which patients are most likely to benefit. One network meta-analysis shows that a combination of folic acid and vitamin B6 lowers the risk of stroke more effectively than B vitamin mixtures that include vitamin B12 (96165). However, this analysis is limited because it didn't account for dosing. Exposure to low, but not high amounts, of vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) seems to reduce stroke risk (96150).
• Tardive dyskinesia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 prevents tardive dyskinesia in patients taking neuroleptic drugs. Details: A small clinical study in patients taking neuroleptic drugs for schizophrenia shows that taking vitamin B6 (form not specified) 400 mg daily seems to improve Parkinsonian, dystonic, and dyskinetic symptoms when compared with placebo (8558).
• Tourette syndrome. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small, nonblinded clinical study in children aged 4-17 years with untreated Tourette syndrome or with chronic tic disorder and associated symptoms of anxiety shows that taking a liquid nutritional supplement providing vitamin B6 2.8 mg and L-theanine 200 mg daily for 2 months improves scores on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale, but does not reduce anxiety, when compared with patients receiving psychoeducation (108555). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Vincristine-induced neuropathy. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with pyridostigmine; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children ages 11 months to 13 years with neuropathy due to vincristine treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, shows that taking vitamin B6 150 mg/m2 and pyridostigmine 3 mg/kg twice daily for 3 months is associated with reduced severity of sensory and motor neuropathy when compared with baseline (104928). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group. More evidence is needed to rate vitamin B6 for these uses.

(Read more about VITAMIN B6)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Oral beta-alanine, including a specific commercial product (CarnoSyn, Natural Alternatives International), has been used with apparent safety in doses up to 6.4 grams daily for 12 weeks in younger adults (14611,16025,16439,16441,18227,94357,97972,101028,101029,104144,106717), and up to 3.2 grams daily for 12 weeks in adults aged 55 years and older (16442,97955,97961,97965).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using in medicinal amounts.

(Read more about BETA-ALANINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Black pepper has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when black pepper oil is applied topically. Black pepper oil is nonirritating to the skin and is generally well tolerated (11). ...when black pepper oil is inhaled through the nose or as a vapor through the mouth, short-term. Black pepper oil as a vapor or as an olfactory stimulant has been used with apparent safety in clinical studies for up to 3 days and 30 days, respectively (29159,29160,29161,90502). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of black pepper when used orally in medicinal amounts.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (11).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in large amounts. Fatal cases of pepper aspiration have been reported in some patients (5619,5620). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of topical pepper oil when used in children.

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (11).

PREGNANCY: LIKELY UNSAFE
when used orally in large amounts. Black pepper might have abortifacient effects (11,19); contraindicated. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of topical pepper when used during pregnancy.

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (11). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of black pepper when used in medicinal amounts during breast-feeding.

(Read more about BLACK PEPPER)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally, parenterally, or rectally and appropriately. Caffeine has Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912,98806). Caffeine is also an FDA-approved product and a component of several over-the-counter and prescription products (4912,11832). According to a review by Health Canada, and a subsequent large meta-analysis conducted in the US, doses of caffeine up to 400 mg daily are not associated with significant adverse cardiovascular, bone, behavioral, or reproductive effects in healthy adults (11733,98806). The US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee states that there is strong and consistent evidence that consumption of caffeine 400 mg daily is not associated with increased risk of major chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease or cancer, in healthy adults (98806). This amount of caffeine is similar to the amount of caffeine found in approximately 4 cups of coffee. Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine from caffeine-containing natural ingredients such as coffee or green tea does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally, long-term or in high doses (91063). Chronic use, especially in large amounts, can produce tolerance, habituation, psychological dependence, and other adverse effects (3719). Acute use of high doses, typically above 400 mg daily, has been associated with significant adverse effects such as tachyarrhythmia and sleep disturbances (11832). Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine from caffeine-containing natural ingredients such as coffee or green tea does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

LIKELY UNSAFE ...when used orally in very high doses. The fatal acute oral dose of caffeine is estimated to be 10-14 grams (150-200 mg/kg). Serious toxicity can occur at lower doses depending on variables in caffeine sensitivity such as smoking, age, or prior caffeine use (11832,95700,97454,104573). Caffeine products sold to consumers in highly concentrated or pure formulations are considered to a serious health concern because these products have a risk of being used in very high doses. Concentrated liquid caffeine can contain about 2 grams of caffeine in a half cup. Powdered pure caffeine can contain about 3.2 grams of caffeine in one teaspoon. Powdered pure caffeine can be fatal in adults when used in doses of 2 tablespoons or less. As of 2018, these products are considered by the FDA to be unlawful when sold to consumers in bulk quantities (95700).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally or intravenously and appropriately in neonates under the guidance of a healthcare professional (6371,38340,38344,91084,91087,97452). ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods and beverages in children and adolescents (4912,11833,36555). Daily intake of caffeine in doses of less than 2.5 mg/kg daily are not associated with significant adverse effects in children and adolescents (11733,98806). Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine from caffeine-containing natural ingredients such as coffee or green tea does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Intakes of caffeine should be monitored during pregnancy. Caffeine crosses the human placenta, but is not considered a teratogen (38048,38252,91032). Fetal blood and tissue levels are similar to maternal concentrations (4260). The use of caffeine during pregnancy is controversial; however, moderate consumption has not been associated with clinically important adverse fetal effects (2708,2709,2710,2711,9606,16014,16015,98806,108814). In some studies consuming amounts over 200 mg daily is associated with a significantly increased risk of miscarriage (16014,37960). This increased risk seems to occur in those with genotypes that confer a slow rate of caffeine metabolism (98806). According to a review by Health Canada, and a subsequent large meta-analysis conducted in the US, up to 300 mg daily can be consumed during pregnancy without an increased risk of spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, preterm birth, fetal growth retardation, or congenital malformations (11733,98806). However, observational research in a Norwegian cohort found that caffeine consumption is associated with a 16% increased odds of the baby being born small for gestational age when compared with no consumption (100369,103707). The same Norwegian cohort found that low to moderate caffeine consumption during pregnancy is not associated with changes in neurodevelopment in children up to 8 years of age (103699). Advise patients to keep caffeine consumption below 300 mg daily during pregnancy. This is similar to the amount of caffeine in about 3 cups of coffee or tea.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in amounts over 300 mg daily. Caffeine crosses the placenta, producing fetal blood concentrations similar to maternal levels (4260,98806). Consumption of caffeine in amounts over 300 mg daily is associated with a significantly increased risk of miscarriage in some studies (16014,98806). Advise patients to keep caffeine consumption below 300 mg daily during pregnancy. This is similar to the amount of caffeine in about 3 cups of coffee or tea. Additionally, high doses of caffeine throughout pregnancy have resulted in symptoms of caffeine withdrawal in newborn infants (9891). High doses of caffeine have also been associated with spontaneous abortion, premature delivery, and low birth weight (2709,2711,91033,91048,95949). In a cohort of mother/infant pairs with a median maternal plasma caffeine level of 168.5 ng/mL (range 29.5-650.5 ng/mL) during pregnancy, birth weights and lengths were lower in the 4th quartile of caffeine intake compared with the 1st. By age 7, heights and weights were lower by 1.5 cm and 1.1 kg respectively. In another cohort of mother/infant pairs with higher maternal pregnancy plasma caffeine levels, median 625.5 ng/mL (range 86.2 to 1994.7 ng/mL), heights at age 8 were 2.2 cm lower, but there was no difference in weights (109846).

LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Caffeine intake should be closely monitored while breast-feeding. During lactation, breast milk concentrations of caffeine are thought to be approximately 50% of serum concentrations and caffeine peaks in breastmilk approximately 1-2 hours after consumption (23590).

LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in large amounts. Caffeine is excreted slowly in infants and may accumulate. Caffeine can cause sleep disturbances, irritability, and increased bowel activity in breast-fed infants exposed to caffeine (2708,6026).

(Read more about CAFFEINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (7555,12928,12946,95817). However, excessive doses should be avoided. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: Age 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51+ years, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stone, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Other clinical studies suggest that, when combined with vitamin D supplementation, calcium supplementation is not associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Other analyses report conflicting results and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day, to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484), and to combine calcium supplementation with vitamin D supplementation (93533).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. The National Academy of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51 years and older, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Other clinical studies suggest that, when combined with vitamin D supplementation, calcium supplementation is not associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Other analyses report conflicting results and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients to not consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day, to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484), and to combine calcium supplementation with vitamin D supplementation (93533).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (17506).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (945,1586,3263,3264,17506). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prescribing oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancy to those with low dietary calcium intake to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the same daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age independent of pregnancy status: 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg (17506). Doses over these amounts might increase the risk of neonatal hypocalcemia-induced seizures possibly caused by transient neonatal hypoparathyroidism in the setting of excessive calcium supplementation during pregnancy, especially during the third trimester. Neonatal hypocalcemia is a risk factor for neonatal seizures (97345).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts typically found in food. Capsicum has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912). ...when used topically and appropriately (7038,10650,105345). The active capsicum constituent capsaicin is an FDA-approved ingredient used in certain over-the-counter, topical preparations (272).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately, short-term in medicinal amounts. A specific sustained-release chili extract (Capsifen) has been used safely in doses of up to 200 mg daily, for up to 28 days (105196). ...when used intranasally and appropriately, short-term. Capsicum-containing nasal sprays, suspensions, and swabs seem to be safe when applied multiple times over 24 hours or when applied daily or every other day for up to 14 days. Although no serious side effects have been reported in clinical trials, intranasal application of capsicum-containing products can be very painful (14322,14324,14328,14329,14351,14352,14353,14356,14357) (14358,14359,14360,15016,105204). POSSIBLY UNSAFE when used orally, long-term or in high doses. There is concern that long-term use or use of excessive doses might be linked to hepatic or kidney damage, as well as hypertensive crisis (12404,40569,40606). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of capsicum when injected.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used topically in children under 2 years old (272). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of capsicum when used orally in children.

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when used topically and appropriately (272).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Capsicum 5 mg daily has been used for up to 28 days during the latter half of the second trimester and the third trimester (96457).

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used topically and appropriately (272).

LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally. Dermatitis can sometimes occur in infants when foods heavily spiced with capsicum peppers are ingested during lactation (739). Also, observational research suggests that intake of raw capsicum peppers during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of sensitization to inhalant allergens in children by the age of 2 years (41021).

(Read more about CAPSICUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Choline is safe in adults when taken in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 3.5 grams daily (3094) ...when used intravenously and appropriately. Intravenous choline 1-4 grams daily for up to 24 weeks has been used with apparent safety (5173,5174).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in doses above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 3. 5 grams daily. Higher doses can increase the risk of adverse effects (3094).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (3094). Choline is safe in children when taken in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL), which is 1 gram daily for children 1-8 years of age, 2 grams daily for children 9-13 years of age, and 3 grams daily for children 14-18 years of age (3094).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in doses above the UL. High doses can increase the risk of adverse effects (3094).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Choline is safe when taken in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL), which is 3 grams daily during pregnancy and lactation in those up to 18 years of age and 3.5 grams daily for those 19 years and older (3094,92114). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of choline used in higher doses during pregnancy and lactation.

(Read more about CHOLINE)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Green coffee extracts taken in doses up to 1000 mg daily, providing up to 500 mg chlorogenic acid, have been used with apparent safety for up to 12 weeks in clinical research (17971,17972,103954). A specific green coffee extract (Svetol, Naturex) has been used with apparent safety in doses up to 200 mg five times daily for up to 12 weeks (17981,17982,17983). Green coffee also contains caffeine, although in lower amounts than regular coffee. One cup of green coffee contains about 20-50 mg of caffeine, compared with about 100 mg in one cup of regular coffee. According to a review by Health Canada, and a subsequent large meta-analysis conducted in the US, doses of caffeine up to 400 mg daily are not associated with significant adverse cardiovascular, bone, behavioral, or reproductive effects in healthy adults (11733,98806). The US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee states that there is strong and consistent evidence that consumption of caffeine 400 mg daily is not associated with increased risk of major chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease or cancer, in healthy adults (98806). Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine found in ingredients such as green coffee, which naturally contains caffeine, does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about GREEN COFFEE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. L-carnitine has been safely used in clinical trials lasting up to 12 months (1947,3620,3621,3623,3624,3625,3626,3627,3628,3629) (3630,3639,4949,8047,9790,12352,16104,16105,16106,16107) (16109,16110,23437,26496,26499,58150,58156,58161,58169,58182) (58189,58204,58207,58209,58213,58294,58523,58554,58556,58647) (58679,58715,58778,58793,58830,58831,58882,59023,59029,59043) (90624,90633,104177,111872,111876,111883,111884,111891,111898). ...when used parenterally as an FDA-approved prescription medicine. Avoid using D-carnitine and DL-carnitine. These forms of carnitine can act as competitive inhibitors of L-carnitine and may cause symptoms of L-carnitine deficiency (1946).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. L-carnitine has been safely used orally in children for up to 6 months (1433,3622,58166,58502,58981,59188,111887,111900,115351). It has also been safely used orally and intravenously in preterm infants (3633,3634,3635,3636,3637,58163,58190,58800,58902,59097)(59161).

PREGNANCY:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally. Supplemental doses of L-carnitine have been given to infants in breast milk and formula with no reported adverse effects. The effects of large doses used while nursing are unknown, but L-carnitine is secreted in the breast milk (3616).

(Read more about L-CARNITINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when niacin is taken in food or as a supplement in amounts below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 30 mg daily for adults 18 years of age and 35 mg daily for adults 19 years and older (6243). ...when prescription products are used orally and appropriately in doses of up to 2 grams daily (12033). CHILDREN:

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts that do not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL). The ULs of niacin for children are: 1-3 years of age, 10 mg daily; 4-8 years of age, 15 mg daily; 9-13 years of age, 20 mg daily; 14-18 years of age, 30 mg daily (6243).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts that do not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL). The UL of niacin during pregnancy and lactation is 30 mg daily for 14-18 years of age and 35 mg daily for 19 years and older (6243). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of larger oral doses of niacin during pregnancy or lactation; avoid using.

(Read more about NIACIN)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately, short-term. There is some clinical research showing that taking rhodiola extract up to 300 mg twice daily has been used without adverse effects for up to 12 weeks (13109,16410,17616,71172,96459,102283,103269).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about RHODIOLA)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Riboflavin 400 mg daily has been taken for up to 3 months, and 10 mg daily has been taken safely for up to 6 months (4912,91752,105480). A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established (3094,91752,94089).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in dietary amounts. A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established (3094,94089). ...when used orally in higher doses for up to 1 year. Doses of 100-200 mg daily have been used safely for 4-12 months in children ages 9-13 years (71483,105484).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in dietary amounts. A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established (3094,94089).

(Read more about RIBOFLAVIN)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Schisandra extract up to 1 gram daily has been used for up to 12 weeks with apparent safety (12,96632,105562,105563,112887).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally. Some evidence suggests schisandra fruit is a uterine stimulant (11).

LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about SCHISANDRA)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher doses can be safely used therapeutically with appropriate medical monitoring (26226,26227).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid exceeding the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension and increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (26229,98176,98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,100310,109395,109396,109398,109399). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sodium when used topically.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (26229,100310). Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid prolonged use of doses exceeding the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension (26229).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in higher doses. Higher intake can cause hypertension (100310). Also, both the highest and the lowest pre-pregnancy sodium quintile intakes are associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia, and the delivery of small for gestational age (SGA) infants when compared to the middle intake quintile (106264).

(Read more about SODIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for thiamine, and doses up to 50 mg daily have been used without adverse effects (15,6243). ...when used intravenously or intramuscularly and appropriately. Injectable thiamine is an FDA-approved prescription product (15,105445).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in dietary amounts. A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for healthy individuals (6243).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in dietary amounts of 1. 4 mg daily. A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for healthy individuals (3094,6243).

(Read more about THIAMINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally, topically, intravenously, intramuscularly, or intranasally and appropriately. Vitamin B12 is generally considered safe, even in large doses (15,1344,1345,1346,1347,1348,2909,6243,7289,7881)(9414,9416,10126,14392,15765,82832,82949,82860,82864,90386)(111334,111551).

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts that do not exceed the recommended dietary allowance (RDA). The RDA for vitamin B12 during pregnancy is 2.6 mcg daily (6243). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of larger amounts of vitamin B12 during pregnancy.

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts that do not exceed the recommended dietary allowance (RDA). The RDA of vitamin B12 during lactation is 2.8 mcg daily (6243). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of larger amounts of vitamin B12 while breastfeeding.

(Read more about VITAMIN B12)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in doses that do not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 100 mg daily in the form of pyridoxine for adults (15,6243). ...when used parenterally and appropriately. Injectable vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) is an FDA-approved prescription product (15).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in doses of 101-200 mg daily (6243,8558).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in doses at or above 500 mg daily. High doses, especially those exceeding 1000 mg daily or total doses of 1000 grams or more, pose the most risk. However, neuropathy can occur with lower daily or total doses (6243,8195). ...when used intramuscularly in high doses and frequency due to potential for rhabdomyolysis (90795).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in doses that do not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of vitamin B6 in the form of pyridoxine 30 mg daily for children aged 1-3 years, 40 mg daily for 4-8 years, 60 mg daily for 9-13 years, and 80 mg daily for 14-18 years (6243).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in amounts exceeding the recommended dietary allowance (5049,8579,107124,107125,107135).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses, long-term (6243).

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. A special sustained-release product providing vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 75 mg daily is FDA-approved for use in pregnancy. Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) is also considered a first-line treatment for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (111601). However, it should not be used long-term or without medical supervision and close monitoring. The tolerable upper intake level (UL) refers to vitamin B6 in the form of pyridoxine and is 80 mg daily for those aged 14-18 years and 100 mg daily for 19 years and older (6243).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. There is some concern that high-dose maternal vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) can cause neonatal seizures (4609,6397,8197).

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in doses not exceeding the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of vitamin B6 in the form of pyridoxine 80 mg daily for those aged 14-18 years and 100 mg daily for those 19 years and older. The recommended dietary allowance (RDA) in lactating women is 2 mg daily (6243). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of vitamin B6 when used in higher doses in breast-feeding women.

(Read more about VITAMIN B6)

(Read more about BETA-ALANINE)

AMOXICILLIN (Amoxil, Trimox) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, black pepper might increase the effects and side effects of amoxicillin.  Details Animal research shows that taking piperine, a constituent of black pepper, with amoxicillin increases plasma levels of amoxicillin (29269). This has not been reported in humans.

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, black pepper might increase the risk of bleeding when taken with antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs.  Details In vitro research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, seems to inhibit platelet aggregation (29206). This has not been reported in humans.

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, black pepper might increase the risk of hypoglycemia when taken with antidiabetes drugs.  Details Animal research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, can reduce blood glucose levels (29225). Monitor blood glucose levels closely. Dose adjustments might be necessary.

ATORVASTATIN (Lipitor) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, black pepper might increase blood levels of atorvastatin.  Details Animal research shows that taking piperine, a constituent of black pepper, 35 mg/kg can increase the maximum serum concentration of atorvastatin three-fold (104188). This has not been reported in humans.

CARBAMAZEPINE (Tegretol) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, black pepper might increase blood levels of carbamazepine, potentially increasing the effects and side effects of carbamazepine.  Details One clinical study in patients taking carbamazepine 300 mg or 500 mg twice daily shows that taking a single 20 mg dose of purified piperine, a constituent of black pepper, increases carbamazepine levels. Piperine may increase carbamazepine absorption by increasing blood flow to the GI tract, increasing the surface area of the small intestine, or inhibiting cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) in the gut wall. Absorption was significantly increased by 7-10 mcg/mL/hour. The time to eliminate carbamazepine was also increased by 4-8 hours. Although carbamazepine levels were increased, this did not appear to increase side effects (16833). In vitro research also shows that piperine can increase carbamazepine levels by 11% in a time-dependent manner (103819).

CYCLOSPORINE (Neoral, Sandimmune) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, black pepper might increase the effects and side effects of cyclosporine.  Details In vitro research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, increases the bioavailability of cyclosporine (29282). This has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, black pepper might increase levels of drugs metabolized by CYP1A1.  Details In vitro research suggests that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, inhibits CYP1A1 (29213). This has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 2B1 (CYP2B1) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, black pepper might increase levels of drugs metabolized by CYP2B1.  Details In vitro research suggests that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, inhibits CYP2B1 (29332). This has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, black pepper might increase levels of drugs metabolized by CYP2D6.  Details In vitro research suggests that some constituents of black pepper inhibit CYP2D6 (29207,29212,38375). This has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, black pepper might increase levels of drugs metabolized by CYP3A4.  Details In vitro research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, as well as the pepper fruit seem to inhibit CYP3A4 (14375,29212). This has not been reported in humans.

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, black pepper might increase blood levels of lithium due to its diuretic effects. The dose of lithium might need to be reduced.  Details Black pepper is thought to have diuretic properties (11).

NEVIRAPINE (Viramune) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Black pepper might increase blood levels of nevirapine.  Details Clinical research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, increases the plasma concentration of nevirapine. However, no adverse effects were observed in this study (29209).

P-GLYCOPROTEIN SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, black pepper might increase levels of P-glycoprotein substrates.  Details In vitro research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, seems to inhibit P-glycoprotein (14375,29281,29283).

PENTOBARBITAL (Nembutal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, black pepper might increase the sedative effects of pentobarbital.  Details Animal research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, increases pentobarbital-induced sleeping time (29214).

PHENYTOIN (Dilantin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Black pepper might increase blood levels of phenytoin.  Details Clinical research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, seems to increase absorption, slow elimination, and increase levels of phenytoin (537,14442). Taking a single dose of black pepper 1 gram along with phenytoin seems to double the serum concentration of phenytoin (14375). Consuming a soup with black pepper providing piperine 44 mg/200 mL of soup along with phenytoin also seems to increase phenytoin levels when compared with consuming the same soup without black pepper (14442).

PROPRANOLOL (Inderal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Black pepper might increase blood levels of propranolol.  Details Clinical research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, seems to increase absorption and slow elimination of propranolol (538).

RIFAMPIN (Rifadin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Black pepper might increase blood levels of rifampin.  Details Clinical research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, seems to increase absorption and serum levels of rifampin (14375,29284).

THEOPHYLLINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Black pepper might increase blood levels of theophylline.  Details Clinical research shows that piperine, a constituent of black pepper, seems to increase absorption and slow elimination of theophylline (538).

(Read more about BLACK PEPPER)

ADENOSINE (Adenocard) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, caffeine might decrease the vasodilatory effects of adenosine and interfere with its use prior to stress testing.  Details Some evidence shows that caffeine is a competitive inhibitor of adenosine and can reduce the vasodilatory effects of adenosine in humans (38172). However, other research shows that caffeine does not seem to affect supplemental adenosine because high interstitial levels of adenosine overcome the antagonistic effects of caffeine (11771). It is recommended that methylxanthines and methylxanthine-containing products be stopped 24 hours prior to pharmacological stress tests (11770). However, methylxanthines appear more likely to interfere with dipyridamole (Persantine) than adenosine-induced stress testing (11771).

ALCOHOL (Ethanol) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Alcohol reduces caffeine metabolism. Concomitant use of alcohol can increase caffeine serum concentrations and the risk of caffeine adverse effects (6370).

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine may increase the risk of bleeding if used with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.  Details Caffeine is reported to have antiplatelet activity. Theoretically, it might increase the risk of bleeding when used concomitantly with these agents (8028,8029); however, this interaction has not been reported in humans.

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, taking caffeine with antidiabetes drugs might interfere with blood glucose control.  Details Data are conflicting. Reports claim that caffeine might increase or decrease blood sugar (6024,8646,114662).

CARBAMAZEPINE (Tegretol) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of carbamazepine and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that taking caffeine can lower the anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine and can induce seizures when taken in doses above 400 mg/kg (23559,23561). Human research has shown that taking caffeine 300 mg in three divided doses along with carbamazepine 200 mg reduces the bioavailability of carbamazepine by 32% and prolongs the plasma half-life of carbamazepine 2-fold in healthy individuals (23562).

CIMETIDINE (Tagamet) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cimetidine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cimetidine decreases the rate of caffeine clearance by 31% to 42% (11736).

CLOZAPINE (Clozaril) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Caffeine might increase the levels and adverse effects of clozapine and acutely exacerbate psychotic symptoms.  Details Caffeine might increase the effects and toxicity of clozapine. Caffeine doses of 400-1000 mg per day inhibit clozapine metabolism (5051). Clozapine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2). Although researchers speculate that caffeine might inhibit CYP1A2, there is no reliable evidence that caffeine affects CYP1A2. There is also speculation that genetic factors might make some patients more sensitive to an interaction between clozapine and caffeine (13741). In one case report, severe, life-threatening clozapine toxicity and multiorgan system failure occurred in a patient with schizophrenia stabilized on clozapine who consumed caffeine 600 mg daily (108817).

CONTRACEPTIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, contraceptive drugs might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Oral contraceptives decrease the rate of caffeine clearance by 40-65% (2714,11737).

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) INHIBITORS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Caffeine is metabolized by CYP1A2. Theoretically, drugs that inhibit CYP1A2 may decrease the rate of caffeine clearance and increase caffeine levels (5051,11741).

DIPYRIDAMOLE (Persantine) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, caffeine might decrease the vasodilatory effects of dipyridamole and interfere with its use prior to stress testing.  Details Caffeine inhibits dipyridamole-induced vasodilation (11770,11772). It is recommended that methylxanthines and methylxanthine-containing products be stopped 24 hours prior to pharmacological stress tests (11770). Methylxanthines appear more likely to interfere with dipyridamole (Persantine) than adenosine-induced stress testing (11771).

DISULFIRAM (Antabuse) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, disulfiram use might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Disulfiram decreases the rate of caffeine clearance (11840).

DIURETIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, using caffeine with diuretic drugs might increase the risk of hypokalemia.  Details Caffeine, especially in excessive amounts, can reduce potassium levels due to stimulation of the sodium-potassium pump (23579,37905,37953,38003,38034). Diuretics can also cause lower potassium levels.

EPHEDRINE Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk for stimulant adverse effects.  Details Use of ephedrine with caffeine can increase the risk of stimulatory adverse effects. There is evidence that using ephedrine with caffeine might increase the risk of serious life-threatening or debilitating adverse effects such as hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, seizures, and death (1275,6486,10307).

ESTROGENS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, estrogens might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Estrogen inhibits caffeine metabolism (2714,23570).

ETHOSUXIMIDE (Zarontin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of ethosuximide and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that caffeine 92.4 mg/kg can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of ethosuximide (23560). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

FELBAMATE (Felbatol) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of felbamate and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that a high dose of caffeine 161.7 mg/kg can decreases the anticonvulsant activity of felbamate (23563). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

FLUCONAZOLE (Diflucan) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, fluconazole might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Fluconazole decreases caffeine clearance by approximately 25% (11022).

FLUTAMIDE (Eulexin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might increase the levels and adverse effects of flutamide.  Details In vitro evidence suggests that caffeine can inhibit the metabolism of flutamide (23553). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

FLUVOXAMINE (Luvox) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, fluvoxamine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Fluvoxamine reduces caffeine metabolism (6370).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Abrupt caffeine withdrawal might increase the levels and adverse effects of lithium.  Details Caffeine has diuretic activity. When abruptly discontinued, caffeine may alter the clearance of lithium (609). There are two case reports of lithium tremor that worsened upon abrupt coffee withdrawal (610) and 6 case reports of elevated serum lithium levels after reducing or eliminating caffeine intake (114665). In one case, a male with schizoaffective disorder stabilized on lithium had an elevated lithium level after reducing his caffeine intake by 87%. At a later date, he increased his caffeine intake by 6-fold, resulting in a subtherapeutic lithium level and a recurrence of psychiatric symptoms (114665).

METFORMIN (Glucophage) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, metformin might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Animal research suggests that metformin can reduce caffeine metabolism (23571). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

METHOXSALEN (Oxsoralen) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, methoxsalen might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Methoxsalen reduces caffeine metabolism (23572).

MEXILETINE (Mexitil) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, mexiletine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Mexiletine reduces caffeine metabolism (1260,11741).

MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITORS (MAOIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk of a hypertensive crisis.  Details Caffeine has been shown to inhibit monoamine oxidase (MAO) A and B in laboratory studies (37724,37877,37912,38108). Concomitant intake of large amounts of caffeine with MAOIs might precipitate a hypertensive crisis (15). In a case report, a patient that consumed 10-12 cups of caffeinated coffee and took the MAOI tranylcypromine presented with severe hypertension (91086). Hypertension was resolved after the patient switched to drinking decaffeinated coffee.

NICOTINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk of hypertension.  Details Concomitant use of caffeine and nicotine has been shown to have additive cardiovascular effects, including increased heart rate and blood pressure. Blood pressure was increased by 10.8/12.4 mmHg when the agents were used concomitantly (36549).

PENTOBARBITAL (Nembutal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, caffeine might decrease the effects of pentobarbital.  Details Caffeine might negate the hypnotic effects of pentobarbital (13742).

PHENOBARBITAL (Luminal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of phenobarbital and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of phenobarbital (23558,23559,23561). However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

PHENOTHIAZINES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, phenothiazines might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Phenothiazines, including perazine, chlorpromazine, levomepromazine, and thioridazine, can reduce the metabolism of caffeine by inhibiting cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) (23573,23574).

PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, phenylpropanolamine might increase the risk of hypertension, as well as the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Concomitant use of phenylpropanolamine and caffeine might cause an additive increase in blood pressure (11738). Phenylpropanolamine also seems to increase caffeine serum levels (13743).

PHENYTOIN (Dilantin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of phenytoin and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of phenytoin (23559,23561). The effect does not seem to be related to the seizure threshold-lowering effects of caffeine. However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

PIOGLITAZONE (Actos) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might increase the levels and clinical effects of pioglitazone.  Details Animal research suggests that caffeine can modestly increase the maximum concentration, area under the curve, and half-life of pioglitazone, and also reduce its clearance. This increased the antidiabetic effects of pioglitazone (108812). However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, quinolone antibiotics might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Quinolones (also called fluoroquinolones) can decrease caffeine clearance by inhibiting cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) enzyme (606,607,608,23554,23555,23556).

RILUZOLE (Rilutek) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the levels and adverse effects of both caffeine and riluzole.  Details Caffeine and riluzole are both metabolized by cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2), and concomitant use might reduce the metabolism of one or both agents (11739).

STIMULANT DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, concomitant use might increase stimulant adverse effects.  Details Due to the central nervous system (CNS) stimulant effects of caffeine, concomitant use with stimulant drugs can increase the risk of adverse effects (11832).

TERBINAFINE (Lamisil) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, terbinafine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Terbinafine decreases the clearance of intravenous caffeine by 19% (11740).

THEOPHYLLINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, caffeine might increase the levels and adverse effects of theophylline.  Details Large amounts of caffeine might inhibit theophylline metabolism (11741).

TIAGABINE (Gabitril) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might increase the levels and adverse effects of tiagabine.  Details Animal research suggests that chronic caffeine administration can increase the serum concentrations of tiagabine. However, concomitant use does not seem to reduce the antiepileptic effects of tiagabine (23561).

TICLOPIDINE (Ticlid) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, ticlopidine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details In vitro evidence suggests that ticlopidine can inhibit caffeine metabolism (23557). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

VALPROATE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of valproate and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of valproate (23558,23559,23561,37882). However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, verapamil might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Verapamil increases plasma caffeine concentrations by 25% (11741).

(Read more about CAFFEINE)