SuperPump 250 Strawberry Kiwi by Gaspari Nutrition

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral bacopa is beneficial in patients with Alzheimer disease. Details: A small clinical study in patients with Alzheimer disease or mild cognitive impairment shows that taking bacopa 300 mg daily for 12 months does not improve measures of cognitive function or memory when compared with donepezil or baseline measures (109623).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral bacopa is beneficial in children with ADHD. Details: A small clinical study in boys 6-14 years of age with symptoms consistent with ADHD but without an official diagnosis shows that taking a specific bacopa supplement (KeenMind - CDRI 08, Flordis) for 14 weeks does not improve symptoms of ADHD but improves some cognitive outcomes including error-making, cognitive flexibility, executive functioning, and sleep when compared with placebo. Bacopa 160 mg was given once daily in those weighing 20-35 kg and twice daily in those over 35 kg (109625). However, another small, open-label study in children aged 6-12 years with ADHD shows that taking a different bacopa supplement (BacoMind, Natural Remedies), 225 mg daily for 6 months, improves symptoms such as restlessness, impulsivity, learning problems, and attention deficit when compared to baseline (97603). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of blinding or comparator group.
• Back pain. Although there is interest in using oral bacopa for back pain, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bacopa for this condition.
• Cognitive function. Bacopa seems to improve some measures of cognitive function, but data are conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of 9 small clinical studies, along with more recent clinical research, shows that taking bacopa 300-600 mg daily for at least 12 weeks is not associated with improved measures of cognition including working memory, learning rate, recognition of pictures and words, reaction time, or attention when compared with placebo. However, subgroup analysis of this meta-analysis and another small clinical study show some evidence of improved reaction times, verbal learning, total recall, retention, memory, and information processing in healthy adults when compared with placebo (10058,17946,33287,97605,109624,111520). In children aged 6-8 years old, a very small clinical study shows that taking a syrup containing bacopa extract 350 mg three times daily for 3 months improves visual motor function and immediate memory when compared to baseline (33304). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a statistical comparison to the placebo group. Bacopa has also been studied in combination with other ingredients. A study in healthy adults aged 18-60 years shows that taking a single dose of a combination of bacopa 300 mg, American ginseng 100 mg, and coffee fruit extract 100 mg (Bacognize) improves some measures of working memory and attention by a small amount at 45 minutes when compared with placebo (103375). It is unclear if these effects are due to bacopa, other ingredients, or the combination. In contrast, a moderate-sized study in healthy, middle-aged adults shows that taking a combination product containing whole plant bacopa 7.5 grams, gingko biloba, and group B vitamins for 12 weeks does not improve measures of memory, attention, cognition, mood, or stress reactivity when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis shows a possible benefit of bacopa supplementation on measures of attention in those with an optimal diet at baseline (111334).
• Cognitive impairment. It is unclear if oral bacopa is beneficial in patients with cognitive impairment. Details: A small clinical study in patients with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer disease shows that taking bacopa 300 mg daily for 12 months does not improve measures of cognitive function or memory when compared with donepezil or baseline (109623).
• Congestive heart failure (CHF). Although there is interest in using oral bacopa for CHF, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bacopa for this condition.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral bacopa is beneficial in patients with depression. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with depression who have not responded to citalopram 40 mg daily shows that adding bacopa extract 300 mg twice daily for 4 weeks improves scores on depression rating scales when compared with citalopram alone (103378).
• Hypertension. Although there is interest in using oral bacopa for hypertension, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bacopa for this condition.
• Insomnia. Although there is interest in using oral bacopa for insomnia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bacopa for this condition.
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Bacopa has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS shows that taking a combination of bacopa and bael (Aegel marmalos) reduces symptoms in 65% of patients, compared with 78% of patients taking clidinium bromide, chlordiazepoxide, and blond psyllium, and 33% taking placebo. Neither treatment is more effective than placebo for preventing relapses (10059).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral bacopa is beneficial in patients with Parkinson disease. Details: A very small study in older adults with Parkinson disease taking levodopa shows that taking a specific bacopa extract (Cognitus, Herbarium) 225 mg or 450 mg daily for 90 days does not improve Parkinsonian or systemic symptoms, motor activity, emotional function, or social outcomes when compared with placebo (111523). The validity of these findings is limited by a small sample size and lack of randomization.
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although there is interest in using oral bacopa for RA, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bacopa for this condition.
• Sexual dysfunction. Although there is interest in using oral bacopa for sexual dysfunction, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bacopa for this condition.
• Smoking cessation. Oral bacopa has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults in India with a history of smoking 5 or more cigarettes daily for at least 3 years shows that taking a specific combination product containing bacopa 100 mg, ashwagandha, clove, ginger, cowhage, turmeric, and other herbal extracts (Smotect , Smotect India) twice daily for 3 months reduces the number of cigarettes smoked daily and alveolar carbon monoxide and carboxyhemoglobin levels but does not improve lung capacity when compared with placebo (112115). It is unclear if these effects are due to bacopa, other ingredients, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate bacopa for these uses.

(Read more about BACOPA)

EFFECTIVE

• Migraine headache. Oral caffeine in combination with acetaminophen, aspirin, and/or sumatriptan is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating migraine headache. Details: Taking caffeine 100-260 mg orally in combination with acetaminophen 500-2000 mg, aspirin 500 mg, and/or sumatriptan 50-100 mg is effective for treating migraine headache (2715,2716,2717,37614,37626,37816,91068). Some evidence shows that caffeine in combination with aspirin and acetaminophen may be more effective than sumatriptan in treating a migraine attack (37666). However, taking caffeine 200 mg plus ergotamine seems to be less effective than sumatriptan or calcium carbasalate plus metoclopramide (37685,38312). Caffeine is an FDA-approved product for use with analgesics for the treatment of migraine.
• Neonatal apnea. Oral or intravenous caffeine citrate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the short-term treatment of neonatal apnea in very preterm infants. Details: Using caffeine orally or intravenously improves apnea of prematurity in very preterm infants and reduces the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, invasive mechanical ventilation, and neurodevelopmental impairment (6023,6371,37857,37906,38124,38344,98807,100364,114658). The dosage approved in the FDA labeling is a single loading dose of caffeine citrate 20 mg/kg (10 mg/kg caffeine base), followed by 5 mg/kg of caffeine citrate (2.5 mg/kg caffeine base) every 24 hours for maintenance. Clinical research shows that caffeine citrate dose-dependently reduces the number of apnea episodes by at least 50% over 7-10 days of treatment (6371). Most research suggests that doses above 10 mg/kg daily reduce the risk of apnea, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and problematic extubation when compared with doses below 10 mg/kg/day (98807,100364,114658). Additional clinical research shows that reinitiating caffeine treatment after termination of the original caffeine regimen, and continuing until 40 weeks postmenstrual age, reduces the incidence of intermittent hypoxia in premature infants by 46% when compared to standard care (91073). At 18-21 months of age, a history of neonatal caffeine treatment reduces the risk of long-term complications of apnea of prematurity, such as cerebral palsy or cognitive delay (37722,38340). At 11 years of age, individuals born prematurely and treated with caffeine have improved visuomotor, visuoperceptual, and visuospatial abilities when compared to those who received placebo (97452). At 6-11 years of age, these individuals may also have a reduced risk of motor impairment (114658). Data on the prophylactic use of caffeine in very low birth-weight infants (less than 1500 grams and 32 weeks' gestation) are conflicting. In a meta-analysis of 11 studies, 5 show a reduced risk of apnea of prematurity, oxygen therapy, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, patent ductus arteriosus, and retinopathy of prematurity, and a reduced duration of mechanical ventilation (111491). However, other studies do not show any benefit (38125,111491). A study of infants born at 34-36 weeks' gestation shows that caffeine citrate, 10 or 20 mg/kg orally daily, reduces the number of intermittent hypoxemia episodes per hour by 61% and 67% respectively, when compared with placebo (111493). Caffeine and aminophylline have similar effectiveness for management of apnea, bradycardia, and hypoxemia, but caffeine has a wider range of safe plasma levels and lower rates of tachycardia and feeding intolerance (111492).
• Postoperative headache. Oral or intravenous caffeine is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing headache in postoperative patients who regularly consume caffeinated products. Details: Clinical research shows that using caffeine is effective for preventing postoperative headache in patients who regularly consume caffeinated products. Intravenous caffeine does not seem to be effective in non-regular caffeine consumers. Studied doses have included 200 mg intravenously or oral doses calculated based on average daily consumption (2725,2726). Caffeine is an FDA-approved product for preventing headache in postoperative patients who regularly consume caffeinated products.
• Tension headache. Oral caffeine in combination with analgesics is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating tension headache. Details: Taking caffeine orally in combination with analgesics is effective for treating simple tension headache. Taking caffeine 100 mg alone is more effective at reducing tension headache pain when compared with placebo, but less effective than the combination of caffeine and analgesics. Caffeine 130 mg has been used with acetaminophen 1000 mg or with acetaminophen 500 mg and aspirin 500 mg. Caffeine 50 mg has been used with acetylsalicylic acid 250 mg and acetaminophen 200 mg (2718,11832,37668,37773).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral caffeine taken as a single dose of at least 2-3 mg/kg can modestly improve endurance, muscle strength, power output, and overall athletic performance when taken prior to certain forms of athletic activity or exercise. However, the magnitude and duration of effect is variable and may be dependent on the form and dose of caffeine, as well as various individual- and activity-specific factors. Caffeine intake in excess of 800 mg daily can result in blood levels greater than those allowed by the National Collegiate Athletic Association. Details: Clinical research and meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking caffeine 2-10 mg/kg modestly improves work produced, aerobic endurance, muscle strength and endurance, power output, and overall athletic performance (10203,11832,37648,37894,38054,38063,95955,100362,100365,100371)(103701,103703,108798,111250,114655,114657,114661,114673). According to the International Society of Sports Nutrition, the most consistent and measurable effects are seen in aerobic endurance; the minimal effective dose for any form of exercise is unclear, but benefits have been most consistent at doses of 3-6 mg/kg (114673). Meta-analyses of studies using caffeine 3-9 mg/kg as a single dose prior to endurance time trials report variability in results. Sports studied included running, rowing, cycling, swimming, and Nordic skiing, and included both recreational and trained athletes. Overall there was a small positive effect on time to exhaustion, endurance performance, and mean power output, and a decrease in the time needed to complete the trials when compared with placebo (98808,111497,114655). One meta-analysis of studies that evaluated cycling time trial performance found that doses of 4-6 mg/kg, but not doses of 1-3 mg/kg, improved performance (114655). A separate meta-analysis of 14 clinical studies shows that taking caffeine 2-11 mg/kg approximately 45-60 minutes before exercise improves muscle strength and endurance in the upper and lower body when compared with placebo. However, a sub-group analysis shows that muscle strength only improves with caffeine doses of at least 6 mg/kg (114657). Another meta-analysis of small clinical trials shows that the benefit of caffeine on athletic performance seems to increase with increased duration of activity. This suggests that caffeine can improve physical endurance during athletic activities (100371). In these trials, caffeine is typically provided as a single dose 30-150 minutes prior to testing (98808), although one study suggests that taking caffeine 60 minutes prior to peak activity has the most consistent ergogenic benefits (104577). Caffeine might improve performance in some athletic activities but not others. Some research shows that caffeine does not improve performance during athletic activities requiring a high amount of exertion over a short period of time. Such activities include sprinting and lifting (11832,37564,37758,37837,37841,37890,38319,95963,97459,112740). However, it is possible that the negative lifting studies were underpowered. Ballistic exercise, such as jumping or throwing, requires rapid increases in velocity, force, and muscle activation. A meta-analysis of 10 studies shows that caffeine in a range of doses (mean: 3 mg/kg) has a significant ergogenic effect on throwing performance and velocity (111488). A meta-analysis of small studies shows that caffeine modestly improves bench press repetitions and maximum strength, but not perceived exertion, when compared with placebo. Caffeine also tends to improve these parameters for leg presses, but the improvement does not reach significance when compared with placebo (103701). A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in female team-sport athletes shows that caffeine improves specific team-sport skills but has no effect on perceived exertion or agility tests performed after exertion (108799). Conversely, a small individual clinical study shows that taking caffeine 6.5 mg/kg 60 minutes before strength training decreases perceived exertion while increasing the number of repetitions of both upper and lower limb exercises by 17% to 33% over placebo (104581). Some clinical research also shows that taking caffeine can decrease subjective feelings of exertion and fatigue during exercise such as fencing and cycling (17618,37656,91026,91058,91062). Although some other clinical studies show that caffeine does not affect perceived exertion, caffeine does seem to improve performance and cause small increases in the amount of physical work done when compared with placebo in various athletes, including cyclists, runners, basketball players, and golfers (37702,37860,37872,38031,38119,38320,91037,91077,97457,97459)(104580,108800,108804). These effects do not seem to be dependent upon the dose of caffeine (97459), although some research shows that the timing of caffeine intake and exercise may alter overall benefit, with a greater effect seen in the morning compared to the evening (97457,104580). Most research has investigated the acute effects of a single dose of caffeine. The evidence is mixed as to whether chronic intake of caffeine could induce tolerance and reduce any acute ergogenic benefits (114673). One study shows that the consistent consumption of caffeine 3 mg/kg daily for 28 days eliminates the acute benefits of caffeine in work produced when compared with placebo, suggesting the development of tolerance (95955). However, chronic use of caffeine at a dose of 6 mg/kg for 4 days does not seem to induce tolerance to an acute dose of caffeine 6 mg/kg taken 60 minutes prior to a cycling time trial in males who are moderate to high users of caffeine (104576). Similarly, a small clinical study in trained individuals shows that acute supplementation with oral caffeine 6 mg/kg about 1 hour prior to performance improves strength and endurance when compared with placebo or control, regardless of habitual caffeine consumption (108804). Differences may be due to the type of exercise, the acute dose of caffeine, the length of the chronic intake period, and/or the normal caffeine intake of the athlete. Most studies suggest that there is significant inter-individual variability in response to caffeine for improvement of athletic performance (100365). These differences might be due, at least in part, to genotype (100370,114673), although research is conflicting. Caffeine is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) enzyme. One small clinical trial in resistance-trained males shows that taking caffeine 6 mg/kg improves resistance exercise performance in those homozygous for the CYP1A2 rs762551 polymorphism (AA) when compared with those without or heterozygous for that polymorphism (CC or A/C, respectively) (100370). However, another clinical study in trained male athletes shows that taking oral caffeine 4 mg/kg about 30 minutes prior to performance decreases handgrip strength by about 13% in individuals with the CC genotype when compared with placebo, but not in those with the AA or A/C genotypes. No groups experienced an improvement in vertical jump performance (108803). Another small clinical study suggests that CYP1A2 genotype does not affect exercise performance in athletes 60 minutes after taking caffeine 3 mg/kg. In addition, the ADORA2A genotype, which plays a role in caffeine sensitivity, does not seem to affect exercise performance benefits from caffeine (104578). However, these studies are small and used different performance protocols; further research is needed to clarify how these polymorphisms may impact the athletic performance benefits of caffeine (114673). Limited research has also evaluated the use of a caffeine mouth rinse, with mixed findings. Two very small clinical studies in healthy trained males shows that rinsing the mouth with 25 mL of water containing caffeine 85 or 300 mg for 5-10 seconds does not affect athletic performance or time to exhaustion while cycling when compared with placebo (103709,108801). However, another small study in healthy Taekwondo athletes fasting for Ramadan suggests that using a mouth rinse containing caffeine 6 mg/kg, ten seconds prior to exertion, modestly reduces perceived exertion and modestly improves kick performance when compared with using a placebo rinse (103710). Similarly, another small clinical study in healthy, resistance-trained males shows that rinsing the mouth with 25 mL of a solution containing caffeine 3%, but not 1% or 2%, reduces perceived exertion and increases muscular endurance, but not strength, when compared with placebo. The mouth rinse was used for 5 seconds immediately prior to a strength test or once per minute for 2 minutes during a muscular endurance test (108802). Preliminary clinical research has also investigated the use of caffeine in combination with other ingredients, such as sodium bicarbonate or creatine. However these studies have not demonstrated clear benefits in athletic performance over taking caffeine alone (112740,114673).
• Mental alertness. Oral caffeine increases mental alertness. However, it might not improve performance or accuracy to the same extent achieved through adequate sleep. Details: Consumption of caffeinated beverages or caffeine supplements seems to prevent a decline in alertness and cognitive capacity when consumed throughout the day (4221,4224,36439,37727,37757,37759,38070,38075,38158,91093)(91075). Caffeine appears to be especially effective in individuals that are not regular users (91074). Taking caffeine 100-600 mg can improve alertness and speed following prolonged sleep deprivation but usually does not affect mental performance or accuracy (10205,37716,37755,37806,37992,38007,38035,38139,91049,91072)(103706,112736). Drinking coffee containing caffeine 100 mg prior to a cognitive performance test improves reaction times in people with recent poor sleep quality, and in those with adequate sleep. However, the increase in vigilance occurring in the sleep-deprived people does not bring their performance up to the level seen with adequate sleep. Also, the number of errors made by sleep-deprived people seems to increase, suggesting that caffeine may have a detrimental effect on inhibitory control (98809). Caffeine also appears to reduce cognitive impairment caused by medications such as chlorpheniramine (91058). Combining caffeine with certain other supplements may improve mental performance. Taking caffeine 80 mg with taurine seems to provide a small improvement in mental performance (9899), although this effect is not observed in sleep deprived subjects (38154). Some clinical research shows that combining caffeine 40-75 mg with glucose 37.5 grams or L-theanine 97-100 mg improves mental performance better than placebo or either substance alone (13732,37762,37903,38116); however, other clinical research shows no additional benefit from combining L-theanine and caffeine (91045).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Intravenous caffeine may reduce the risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants. Details: Population research has found that initiating caffeine treatment prior to the third day of life in premature infants is associated with a reduced risk of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia compared to later initiation of treatment with caffeine. Additionally, a meta-analysis of available clinical research shows that high-dose caffeine (40-80 mg/kg loading dose, 20 mg/kg daily maintenance) lowers the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia when compared with standard dosing (20 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 5-10 mg/kg daily maintenance). However, small sample sizes and high heterogeneity limit the validity of these findings (97462,100364).
• Diabetes. Dietary caffeine seems to be beneficial for the prevention of type 2 diabetes; it is unclear if it is beneficial for the prevention of gestational diabetes. Also, it is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Details: Total caffeine consumption from beverages such as coffee or tea is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes. This effect appears to be dose-dependent (11353,14313,37850,37871,91040,100368). For example, an increase of 200 mg daily caffeine intake seems to be associated with a 14% decrease in the incidence of type 2 diabetes (91055). Additionally, in North American males, consuming caffeine 417 mg daily from coffee or tea is associated with a 20% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with those consuming less than 37 mg daily. North American females consuming at least 258 mg of caffeine daily from coffee or tea seem to have a 10% to 30% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with those consuming less than 140 mg daily (11353). Japanese adults who consume at least 416 mg of caffeine daily from beverages including coffee or green tea seem to have a 33% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared to those who consume no more than 57 mg daily. The risk reduction appears to be more pronounced in Japanese females when compared with males (14313). It is unclear if caffeine is beneficial in adults with diabetes. A few small studies show that caffeine consumption may further reduce insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes, gestational diabetes, or those at risk for developing diabetes (13744,37653,37820). Caffeine consumption has also been evaluated during pregnancy. An observational study has found that self-reported consumption of beverages containing up to 100 mg of caffeine at 16-22 weeks' gestation is associated with a 47% lower risk of developing gestational diabetes when compared with no intake (108814). Research regarding the effects of caffeine in patients with type 1 diabetes shows conflicting results. One study shows that taking caffeine 250 mg twice daily for 2 weeks can reduce the incidence of elevated blood sugar at night in patients with type 1 diabetes (37660). However, another study in patients with type 1 diabetes shows that taking caffeine 200 mg daily for 3 months may increase the ability to perceive hypoglycemic symptoms when compared with placebo, although overall glycemic control does not seem to be affected (6024). A small clinical crossover study evaluated caffeine for the prevention of exercise-induced hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes using ultra-long-acting insulin. This study shows that consuming a beverage containing caffeine 250 mg, glucose 10 grams, and aspartame 30 minutes before a moderate intensity cycling exercise does not reduce the risk of exercise-related hypoglycemia, alter the time to hypoglycemia, or increase peak plasma glucose levels during exercise when compared with taking glucose and aspartame (114662).
• Memory. Oral caffeine seems to be beneficial for short-term memory recall in college students and extroverted personalities. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for introverted personalities or other populations. Details: Taking a single dose of caffeine 65-200 mg orally daily seems to improve memory function in some individuals such as college students and people with extroverted personalities. A small study shows that taking caffeine does not improve memory function in individuals with introverted personalities (37845,38071,91080).
• Obesity. Oral caffeine, when taken in combination with ephedrine or as a component of green tea, seems to be beneficial for weight loss, short-term. Details: Taking caffeine orally, in combination with ephedrine or as a component of green tea, seems to help reduce weight, short-term (695,696,1704,8647,16892,37617,37831). Caffeine 192 mg in combination with ephedra 20-90 mg per day for 6 months seems to cause a modest weight reduction (5.3 kg) in people with a body mass index (BMI) between 25-40 kg/m². This combination, along with limiting fat intake to 30% of calories and moderate exercise, also seems to reduce body fat, decrease low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. However, even in carefully screened and monitored otherwise healthy adults, caffeine/ephedra combinations can cause small changes in blood pressure and heart rate (8647). Preliminary clinical research also shows that taking 1000 mg of a proprietary combination product containing caffeine and multiple other ingredients (Prograde Metabolism) twice daily for 8 weeks in conjunction with dieting reduces body weight, fat mass, waist circumference, and hip circumference by 1.5%, 5%, 1.8%, and 1.3%, respectively, when compared with dieting alone (40802).
• Pain (acute). Oral caffeine, when taken in combination with acetaminophen, propyphenazone, ibuprofen, or other pain-relieving agents, seems to be beneficial for acute pain. Details: Clinical research shows that taking caffeine 50-130 mg in combination with acetaminophen, propyphenazone, ibuprofen, or other pain-relieving agents can reduce acute pain when compared with the effects of pain-relieving agents alone (37587,37904,38036,38303,91038). Adding ≥100 mg caffeine to treatment with acetaminophen or ibuprofen results in 5% to 10% more patients that achieve at least 50% of maximum pain relief for over 4 hours when compared to treatment with acetaminophen or ibuprofen alone (91038).
• Postdural puncture headache. Oral or intravenous caffeine seem to be beneficial for preventing postdural puncture headache. Details: Using caffeine 300 mg orally or 500 mg in 1,000 mL normal saline intravenously seems to help treat and prevent postdural puncture headache (2727,2728). Using a combination of ergotamine and caffeine seems to be less effective than gabapentin for treating this condition (38147). Lower doses of oral caffeine may not be beneficial. Clinical research shows that oral caffeine, 75-125 mg, does not decrease the risk of postdural headache (91022).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Atrial fibrillation. Oral caffeine does not seem to prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiopulmonary bypass. In addition, it might increase the risk of gastrointestinal side effects. Details: In adults undergoing surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, taking caffeine 400 mg every 8 hours for 6 doses does not seem to reduce the risk of developing atrial fibrillation during the first three post-operative days. This clinical study was stopped prior to the completion of recruitment after an interim analysis showed increased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and no effect on the incidence of atrial fibrillation (97451).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Oral caffeine does not seem to reduce symptoms of ADHD in children. Details: Most research suggests caffeine does not significantly reduce ADHD symptoms in children when used at tolerable doses (10755,10756,10757,10758,10759,10760). The use of caffeine in adolescents and adults with ADHD has not been studied.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral caffeine prevents cognitive decline with aging. Details: Population research from a small cohort of elderly females shows that caffeine intake of more than 371 mg daily is associated with an attenuation in cognitive decline when compared to less than 30 mg daily. This is equivalent to the difference seen over a 7 year span of age. Caffeinated coffee consumption, but not caffeinated chocolate, tea, or cola, was associated with this attenuation in cognitive decline (91088).
• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for preventing dementia; the available research is conflicting. Details: Population research from the UK Biobank has found that caffeine intake up to 400 mg daily is associated with a 24% to 34% reduced risk of developing Alzheimer disease when compared with lower intake. Conversely, population research from the Rush Memory and Aging Project in the US has found that caffeine intake of more than 100 mg daily is associated with a 41% increased risk of developing Alzheimer disease when compared with lower intake. However, when those with mild cognitive impairment at baseline or cases diagnosed within 2 years of follow-up are excluded, these findings become insignificant (108810).
• Asthma. Oral caffeine seems to modestly improve airway function for up to 4 hours in patients with mild to moderate asthma. However, it is unclear if oral caffeine has a clinically significant effect on asthma symptoms or quality of life. Details: Taking caffeine 9 mg/kg orally appears to modestly improve airway function for up to 4 hours in people with mild to moderate asthma (37907,37915). However, more research is needed to determine the appropriate dose, whether any benefit is clinically significant, or whether tolerance occurs with chronic dosing.
• Cancer pain. It is unclear if intravenous caffeine is beneficial for cancer pain. Details: Clinical research shows that receiving caffeine 200 mg intravenously once daily for 2 days results in a significant reduction in pain intensity by 0.833 points on the NRS scale when compared with control in patients receiving opioids for pain from advanced cancer (91081).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral caffeine improves cognitive performance in trained athletes. Details: A meta-analysis of small studies in trained adult athletes shows that consumption of a low to moderate amount of caffeine 15-60 minutes prior to exercise and during exercise improves attention performance, but not reaction time or inhibitory control, when compared with placebo (108797). The validity of these findings is limited by unclear reporting.
• Dementia. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for preventing dementia or improving behavior in patients with dementia. Details: Population research from the Women's Health Initiative has found that caffeine intake of more than 175 mg daily is associated with a 26% reduced risk of developing probable dementia or global cognitive impairment when compared to less than 175 mg daily in postmenopausal adults 65-80 years of age (97458). Population research from the UK Biobank has found that caffeine intake up to 400 mg daily is associated with a 17% to 26% reduced risk for developing all-cause dementia when compared with lower intake. Conversely, population research from the Rush Memory and Aging Project in the US has found that caffeine intake of more than 100 mg daily is associated with a 35% increased risk of developing all-cause dementia when compared with lower intake. However, when those with mild cognitive impairment at baseline or cases diagnosed within 2 years of follow-up are excluded, these findings become insignificant (108810). Caffeine consumption has also been evaluated in patients with dementia. A cross-sectional study in patients with dementia in a care home has found that intake of 'normal' to 'high' amounts of caffeine are associated with reduced agitation and other behavioral symptoms when compared to 'low' intakes of caffeine (104574).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Some population research found that caffeine intake is associated with an increased incidence of depressive symptoms in pediatric patients (37839,38162). However, other population research found that caffeinated beverage intake is associated with a decreased incidence of depression in adults (37969,38165,91067,100366).
• Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) augmentation. Although there has been interest in using intravenous caffeine sodium benzoate to augment electroconvulsive therapy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of caffeine for this condition.
• Exercise-induced hypoxemia. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for hypoxemia associated with exercise. Details: Preliminary clinical research in athletes experiencing exercise-induced hypoxemia shows that taking caffeine 8 mg/kg can improve exercise ventilation, but not ventilatory response or oxygen saturation, when compared with placebo (37750).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for reducing muscle soreness during exercise. Details: There is conflicting clinical evidence as to whether caffeine can reduce exercise-induced muscle pain. Some evidence shows that taking caffeine 100 mg or 10 mg/kg can reduce muscle pain during exercise when compared with placebo (37622,38146). However, the effect of lower doses is unclear. Some evidence shows that taking caffeine 5 mg/kg may reduce exercise-induced muscle pain when compared with placebo (37747,91050), while other evidence suggests that taking caffeine 2-5 mg/kg does not affect muscle pain during exercise (38141).
• Gallbladder disease. It is unclear if increased dietary caffeine intake reduces the risk of developing gallstones. Details: Consumption of caffeinated beverages that provide 400 mg or greater of caffeine per day is associated with a significantly reduced risk of developing symptomatic gallstone disease (3345,8032). The effect seems to be dose-dependent; consumption of 800 mg caffeine per day has the greatest reduction in risk (3345).
• Hepatitis C. It is unclear if increased dietary caffeine reduces the risk for hepatitis C-associated severe liver inflammation, although it may reduce the risk of developing advanced fibrosis. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that regular consumption of caffeine at doses of at least 123 mg daily is associated with a 48% reduced risk of advanced liver fibrosis when compared to lower caffeine intake in patients with hepatitis C virus (95947). An individual population study also found that higher intake of caffeine from coffee is associated with reduced severity of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus. For these patients, the risk of advanced fibrosis is reduced by 14% for each 67 mg of caffeine (37896). However, caffeine intake does not appear to be associated with a reduced risk of moderate to severe liver inflammation in patients with hepatitis C (95947).
• Hypnic headache. It is unclear if oral caffeine reduces the pain associated with this rare condition. Details: Anecdotal evidence suggests that drinking a cup of coffee containing caffeine before bed or upon waking up may help alleviate pain associated with hypnic headaches (38078).
• Hypotension. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial in people with low blood pressure. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming caffeinated beverages increase blood pressure in elderly people with postprandial hypotension (11834,11835).
• Intermittent claudication. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for intermittent claudication. Details: Taking a single dose of caffeine 6 mg/kg orally seems to improve walking distance, muscular strength, and endurance in patients with intermittent claudication; however, balance seems to be reduced (38038).
• Liver disease. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for liver disease prevention. Details: Population research found that there is an inverse association between intake of coffee and the incidence of liver cirrhosis (37576,37608). However, it is unclear if this effect of coffee is attributable to caffeine, since other caffeinated beverages do not show this effect.
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for the symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Details: A small crossover study in adults with MS shows that taking caffeine 200 mg daily for 12 weeks may modestly improve balance, functional mobility, and MS-related quality of life, but not walking function, when compared to a 2-week placebo run-in period. All patients were told to eliminate all other forms of caffeine from their diets; however, baseline caffeine intake was not recorded (114663). The validity of this study is limited by the small size and heterogeneous nature of the study population, which included patients with various forms of MS at varying levels of severity.
• Narcolepsy. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for narcolepsy. Details: A small clinical study in patients with narcolepsy shows that taking caffeine 200 mg daily in the morning for 1 week does not affect reaction time, but modestly reduces drowsiness, when compared with baseline (103698). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a statistical comparison between the treatment and placebo groups.
• Neonatal resuscitation. It is unclear if oral caffeine improves the likelihood for successful extubation in preterm infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in extremely preterm infants requiring mechanical ventilation within the first 5 days of birth shows that early administration of caffeine, given as a loading dose of caffeine citrate 20 mg/kg followed by a maintenance dose of 5 mg/kg daily until extubation, does not reduce mortality or shorten time to first successful extubation when compared to giving a bolus dose of caffeine citrate 20 mg/kg just prior to extubation (97461).
• Nocturnal enuresis. Reducing caffeine intake might reduce the frequency of nocturnal enuresis episodes in children. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children aged 6-15 years with primary nocturnal enuresis shows that limiting caffeine intake to less than 30 mg daily reduces the mean number of bedwetting episodes from 3.5 to 2.4 per week, when compared with no change in the group with intakes of 80-100 mg daily. The probability of bedwetting in the caffeine restricted group was about 14% lower than that in the control group (111495).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for nonmelanoma skin cancer prevention. Details: A review of available population research shows that increased caffeine intake from any source is associated with a 14% reduction in the risk of developing nonmelanoma skin cancer. Consumption of caffeinated coffee, but not decaffeinated coffee, is associated with an 18% reduced risk (97465).
• Parkinson disease. Although consuming caffeinated beverages might reduce the risk of developing Parkinson disease, it is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for improving symptoms. Also, oral caffeine does not seem to prevent tardive dyskinesia. Details: It is unclear whether caffeine improves some symptoms of Parkinson disease, as results from clinical research are conflicting (91069,95951,95954,103705). One clinical study in Parkinson disease patients with extreme daytime somnolence shows that taking caffeine 100 mg twice daily for 3 weeks and then 200 mg twice daily for 3 weeks results in modest improvements in rigidity and bradykinesia, but inconsistent improvements in drowsiness, when compared with placebo (91069). Other clinical research shows that caffeine 200 mg twice daily does not lead to improvements in motor severity, cognition, or somnolence after 6, 12, or 18 months when compared with placebo (95954). Furthermore, a large retrospective study has found that caffeine consumption of more than 300 mg daily for 18 months in conjunction with dopaminergic therapy does not slow the rate of Parkinson disease progression. This research also shows that a reported consumption of caffeine greater than 300 mg, in conjunction with creatine 10 grams daily for 18 months, may accelerate the rate of Parkinson disease progression (95951). The retrospective nature of this study limits the validity of these findings. Caffeine does not appear to be helpful for reducing the risk of tardive dyskinesia. A retrospective analysis has found no definitive difference in onset of tardive dyskinesia in Parkinson patients consuming more than 204 mg caffeine daily when compared with those consuming less than 68 mg daily (91090). Despite these mainly negative findings, large-scale epidemiological studies have found that people who consume caffeinated beverages, such as coffee, tea, and cola, have a decreased risk of Parkinson disease (37931,91060,91071,103705). Males consuming 3-4 cups (28 oz) of caffeinated coffee per day, or 421-2716 mg total caffeine, seem to have the lowest risk of developing this condition. However, a lower risk is also associated with consumption of as little as 124-208 mg of caffeine (6022). In females, more moderate caffeinated coffee consumption, such as 1-3 cups per day, seems to be best (1238). Caffeine does not appear to provide additional protection from Parkinson disease in cigarette smokers (9236,91060).
• Postoperative ileus. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for improving bowel recovery following colorectal surgery. Research is conflicting and may vary depending on the type of procedure performed. Details: A meta-analysis of two small clinical trials in adults undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection shows that taking caffeine 100-200 mg three times daily, starting on postoperative day 1, does not reduce the time to the first stool, time to first flatus, or length of hospital stay (LOS) when compared with placebo (112732). Another meta-analysis of 8 trials, including the 2 trials discussed previously, pooled 610 patients undergoing open and laparoscopic colorectal procedures. The analysis shows that caffeine taken three times daily, starting either on the day of surgery or on postoperative day 1, reduces LOS and the time to first bowel movement when compared with placebo, tea, or decaffeinated coffee. However, a sub-analysis of only laparoscopic procedures shows no difference in LOS between groups. These findings are limited by high heterogeneity, which appears to be due primarily to differences between open and laparoscopic procedures (114660).
• Postoperative pain. It is unclear if intravenous caffeine is beneficial for reducing opioid consumption in adults undergoing surgery. Details: A small clinical study in adults undergoing laparoscopic colorectal and gastrointestinal surgery shows that intravenous caffeine citrate 200 mg at the initiation of surgical closure has no effect on cumulative opioid consumption through postoperative day 3 when compared with placebo. In fact, post-hoc analysis with adjustment for age, sex, comorbidities, history of anxiety or depression, and open surgical conversion suggests an increase in opioid consumption with administration of caffeine when compared with placebo (108809).
• Pre-eclampsia. It is unclear if oral caffeine intake affects the risk of gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia. Details: a meta-analysis of 10 observational studies including about 115,000 pregnant people did not find an association between the level of caffeine intake during pregnancy and the risk of developing gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia (111485).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Population research has found that increased intake of either caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee is associated with a decreased risk of stroke in females (37804). However, it is not clear if the effect of coffee is attributable to the caffeine component.
• Tinnitus. It is unclear if oral caffeine is beneficial in patients with chronic tinnitus. Details: A small clinical study in adults with chronic tinnitus shows that taking a single dose of caffeine 300 mg improves mood and quality of life at 1 hour when compared with baseline. (108805). The lack of statistical comparison to the placebo group limits the validity of these findings. More evidence is needed to rate the effectiveness of caffeine for these uses.

(Read more about CAFFEINE)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Dietary cocoa seems to be beneficial for CVD prevention. Oral cocoa extract may reduce the risk of CVD-related death, but it is unclear if it can prevent other CVD-related outcomes like myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. Details: A large clinical trial in adults without CVD shows that taking a specific cocoa extract daily for around 3.5 years reduces the risk of CVD-related death by 27%, but does not reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, including MI or stroke, or overall mortality when compared with placebo. This specific cocoa extract contained 500 mg of flavanols, including 80 mg of epicatechins (108898). In 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that very limited scientific evidence suggests that the cocoa flavanols in high flavanol cocoa powder, for products containing at least 4% naturally conserved cocoa flavanols, may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (110017). Observational research in adults without CVD has also found that consuming a higher amount of cocoa is associated with a 10% lower risk of CVD and an up to 50% lower risk of CVD-related mortality when compared with consuming lower amounts of cocoa. Consuming more than 90 grams of cocoa per week did not add further benefit (14288,97192). Additional clinical research shows that taking cocoa flavanols 450 mg twice daily for one month improves cholesterol levels and blood pressure values, resulting in improved Framingham Risk Scores in healthy patients. These scores correspond to a 21% decrease in the 10-year risk for coronary heart disease, a 22% decrease in the risk for CVD, a 31% decrease in the risk for MI, and a 30% decrease in the risk for CVD-related mortality (92273). There is also evidence that consuming cocoa might improve flow-mediated dilatation, a measure of endothelial dysfunction. Meta-analyses of clinical research have found that increased cocoa or chocolate intake significantly improves flow-mediated dilatation. This is seen with intakes of 19-54 grams of cocoa daily, 46-100 grams of dark chocolate daily, or cocoa products containing 16.6-1080 mg of flavonoids daily (17187,42059,42137).
• Hypertension. Oral cocoa seems to be beneficial for modestly decreasing blood pressure in hypertensive patients. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for preventing hypertension. Details: Overall, clinical research shows that chocolate or cocoa containing 25-1080 mg daily of flavonoids modestly reduces blood pressure in hypertensive patients (14306,15655,15752,42092,42107,42169,97190,103247). Meta-analyses of clinical research show that consuming commercially available dark chocolate or flavanol-enriched chocolate/cocoa products daily for 2-8 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure (SBP) by around 4 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by around 2 mmHg in patients with hypertension when compared to control products with low levels of flavanols or no flavanols (42169,97190). Additionally, a meta-analysis of clinical trials in middle-aged and elderly patients with or without hypertension shows that consuming cocoa products daily for 4-18 weeks reduces SBP and DBP by around 3 mmHg and 1.5 mmHg, respectively, when compared with control products (103249). Blood pressure lowering seems to occur more readily in hypertensive or pre-hypertensive individuals when compared with normotensive individuals (14306,15655,15752,42092,42107,42169,97190,103247). Consumption of cocoa might also reduce the risk of developing hypertension in normotensive patients. Observational research has found that long-term consumption of moderate amounts of cocoa (2.2 grams to 6.1 grams daily) is associated with a 7% lower risk of hypertension when compared with consumption of less than 0.61 grams daily. However, consumption of amounts greater than 6.1 grams daily does not seem to reduce hypertension risk. Also, this benefit seems to be limited to patients consuming cocoa from plain chocolate, as consumption of cocoa from desserts was linked with a 9% greater risk of hypertension (103248).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Hypercholesterolemia. Oral cocoa does not seem to be beneficial for reducing cholesterol levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Details: Some preliminary clinical research in healthy, normocholesterolemic males shows that diets high in stearic acid from cocoa butter result in lower cholesterol levels when compared with diets high in myristic acid from dairy butter. However, a diet high in stearic acid from cocoa butter does not significantly lower cholesterol when compared to baseline in this population (15063). A meta-analysis of 10 clinical studies shows that cocoa or dark chocolate can reduce total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in normocholesterolemic patients (42125). However, some preliminary clinical research in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that drinking a high-flavanol cocoa beverage daily for 6 weeks does not reduce cholesterol when compared with a low-flavanol cocoa beverage (42013). Also, while some clinical research shows that taking cocoa powder 26 grams with sugar daily for 12 weeks can increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels when compared with sugar alone in normocholesterolemic and hypercholesterolemic patients (42026), taking cocoa or dark chocolate 13-41 grams daily does not seem to lower total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol in these patients (42026,42029,42225).
• Stretch marks (striae distensae). Topical cocoa butter does not seem to be beneficial for preventing stretch marks. Details: Clinical research shows that topical application with a cream containing cocoa butter 25% to the abdomen daily, starting during the second and third trimesters and continuing until delivery, does not prevent stretch marks when compared with a placebo cream (105261). Other clinical research shows that topical application with a cream containing cocoa butter and vitamin E as tocopheryl acetate to the abdomen, breasts, and thighs, daily, starting during the second trimester and continuing until delivery, does not reduce the prevalence or severity of stretch marks when compared to a cream not containing these ingredients (105262). More research is needed in individuals of all skin types.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for improving cognitive function in healthy older adults. Details: Some small clinical studies in healthy adults over the age of 60 with or without existing cognitive impairment show that sub-chronic intake of cocoa at doses of 45 mg, 520 mg, or 990 mg once daily for 8 weeks, or as a cocoa drink containing flavanols 609 mg daily for 30 days, modestly improves some measures of cognitive function, including task switching, visual attention, and verbal fluency (42184,92269). However, it does not improve performance on the mini mental state exam (92269). Also, one clinical study in healthy adults aged 60 years and older shows that consuming a dark chocolate bar containing 11 grams of cocoa and drinking 237 mL of an artificially sweetened drink containing 11 grams of cocoa daily for 6 weeks does not improve neuropsychological function when compared with placebo (42050). Additional preliminary clinical research in postmenopausal females aged 50-64 years shows that adding chocolate 10 grams daily, containing 99% cocoa, for 6 months does not improve most measures of cognitive function when compared with not taking cocoa (105259). Reasons for the discrepancies are unclear but may relate to the dose of cocoa, the duration of intake, or the specific cognitive testing procedures conducted.
• Age-related testosterone deficiency. Oral cocoa has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy middle-aged adults shows that taking a combination product containing cocoa seed extract and pomegranate rind (Tesnor, Gencor) daily for 56 days increases serum testosterone levels and hand-grip strength and improves measures of sexual function and psychological well-being when compared with placebo (111527). It is unclear if these effects are due to cocoa, pomegranate, or the combination.
• Aging skin. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for aging skin. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with aging skin shows taking a specific product (GliSODin Skin Nutrients Advanced Anti-Aging Formula, Isocell North America Inc.) 780 mg three times daily, containing cocoa extract, as well as superoxide dismutase, krill oil, sea buckthorn, hyaluronic acid, and other nutrients, in combination with daily use of tazarotene cream 0.1%, for 90 days improves fine wrinkling, photodamage, and skin elasticity when compared with tazarotene cream and placebo (91778). Additional preliminary clinical research in patients with photoaged skin shows that drinking a cocoa drink containing 320 mg of flavanols daily for 24 weeks improves wrinkle depth and skin elasticity, but not skin hydration, when compared with placebo (92274).
• Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral cocoa for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cocoa for this condition.
• Athletic performance. Although there has been interest in using oral cocoa for improving athletic performance, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cocoa for this use.
• Atrial fibrillation. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for preventing atrial fibrillation. Details: Most population research has found that chocolate consumption is not associated with a reduced risk of atrial fibrillation (97188,97189).
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for CFS. Details: In patients with CFS, preliminary clinical research shows that consuming 45 grams of a polyphenol-rich chocolate in three divided doses daily for 8 weeks can reduce fatigue by 35%, anxiety by 37%, and depression by 45%, and can increase overall function by 30%, when compared with pretreatment (42116).
• Cirrhosis. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for cirrhosis. Details: Clinical research shows that consuming a liquid test meal (Ensure Plus) in addition to dark chocolate (Lindt Excellence 85% Cocoa, Lindt & Sprüngli) 0.55 grams/kg can reduce the postprandial increase in hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhosis when compared with the test drink alone (42164).
• Cognitive function. Research on the use of oral cocoa for improving cognitive function in healthy adults is conflicting. Details: A large clinical trial in older adults shows that taking cocoa extract containing 500 mg of flavanols daily for 3 years does not improve measures of cognitive function including global cognition, episodic memory, and executive function when compared with placebo, even when taken with a multivitamin-mineral product (Centrum Silver) (111524). Also, in middle-aged participants, clinical research shows that taking 20 grams of a dark chocolate drink mix containing 250 mg or 500 mg of polyphenols as a single dose does not seem to improve measures of cognitive function (92272). In contrast, clinical research in healthy younger individuals shows that consuming a single dose of cocoa flavanols 520-994 mg as a specific powder (Cocoapro) improves some, but not all, measures of cognitive function when examined in a situation of sustained mental effort (42093). Additionally, consuming a single dose of cocoa flavanols 900 mg as a specific powder (Acticoa) seems to improve reaction time during cognitive testing when compared with placebo in healthy adults and patients with type 1 diabetes (103251). However, acute dosing with cocoa flavanols 374-747 mg as specific powders (Acticoa) or cocoa extract capsules (Naturex) does not seem to improve measures of cognitive function, visual working memory, or ability to focus during testing in young people (99984,99985,109448). Reasons for the discrepancies are unclear but may relate to the dose of cocoa, the duration of intake, the level of stress during cognitive testing, or the specific cognitive testing procedures conducted.
• Cognitive impairment. Oral cocoa flavanols have only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; their effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults at least 55 years of age with subjective or mild cognitive impairment shows that consuming dark chocolate containing 500 mg cocoa flavanols and taking fish oil containing DHA 1.1 grams and EPA 0.4 grams daily for 12 months does not improve cognitive function scores when compared with placebo (111453).
• Constipation. Oral cocoa husk has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children with chronic constipation shows that taking 2-4 sachets containing cocoa husk 8-16 grams and beta-fructosans 2-4 grams daily for 4 weeks can reduce hard stools by 45% and reduce transit time by 36 hours when compared with a placebo (42016).
• Diabetes. Several small clinical studies suggest that oral cocoa may cause small but clinically insignificant improvements in glycemic control in patients with diabetes. However, cocoa does not appear to be beneficial for the prevention of diabetes. Details: While some individual studies show conflicting results (97252,99982), two similar meta-analyses of 8-9 small clinical trials in patients with diabetes show that taking cocoa 1-54 grams daily for up to 52 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose by around 7-9 mg/dL and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by around 10-15 mg/dL, but does not improve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin levels, blood pressure, total cholesterol, or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, when compared with control (109447,109449). This slight improvement in fasting blood glucose, along with a lack of effect on HbA1c, suggests that cocoa is unlikely to lead to clinically meaningful improvements in glycemic control. Population research has found that eating up to 60 grams of chocolate per week is associated with a lower risk of developing diabetes. Higher consumption was not found to affect diabetes risk (97192). However, secondary analysis of a large clinical study in adults aged 74 on average shows that taking an extract containing cocoa flavanols 500 mg daily, with or without a multivitamin, for about 3.5 years does not reduce the risk of developing self-reported type 2 diabetes when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis based on body mass index, level of physical activity, or multivitamin consumption did not change results (111619).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral cocoa flavanols are beneficial for preventing exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a single dose of cocoa flavanols (Chococru Extraordinary Flavanol Cocoa) 830 mg or 1245 mg within 5 minutes of a strenuous exercise protocol does not reduce exercise-induced muscle damage over 72 hours when compared with a control providing no cocoa flavanols (105260).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for fatigue. Details: A moderate-size clinical study in otherwise healthy females aged 40-60 years with fatigue shows that consuming a beverage containing cocoa flavanols 240 mg daily for 8 weeks does not improve self-reported fatigue scores when compared with placebo (111620).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for heart failure prevention. Details: Population research has found that consuming up to 250 grams of chocolate weekly is associated with reduced risk of heart failure. However, consuming 300 grams weekly or more does not appear to affect the risk of heart failure (97187,97191).
• HIV/AIDS-related dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for HIV/AIDS-related dyslipidemia. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with HIV shows that consuming dark chocolate 65 grams containing cocoa 36 grams for 15 days does not affect low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or total cholesterol levels when compared with a white chocolate placebo. However, it slightly increases levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (96472).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial in patients with prediabetes. Details: A small clinical study in premenopausal adults with overweight or obesity and mild insulin resistance shows that drinking a cocoa drink high in flavanols twice daily for 4 weeks does not improve measures of insulin resistance or insulin-mediated glucose uptake when compared with a low-flavanol cocoa drink (111532).
• Influenza. Although there has been interest in using oral cocoa for influenza, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cocoa for this condition.
• Insect repellent. It is unclear if topical cocoa oil is beneficial as an insect repellent. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that topical application of cocoa oil, 1 mL on each leg and 0.5 mL on each forearm, reduces bites from black flies (Simulium damnosum) by 99% (41954).
• Isolated systolic hypertension. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for isolated systolic hypertension. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming 100 grams daily of cocoa polyphenol-rich dark chocolate might modestly reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (13166).
• Menopausal symptoms. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for menopausal symptoms. Details: In postmenopausal individuals aged 50-64 years, preliminary clinical research shows that adding chocolate 10 grams daily, containing cocoa 99%, for 6 months reduces body fat mass by approximately 0.6 kg and body fat percentage by 0.8%, and modestly improves some measures of quality of life, when compared with no treatment (105255,105258). However, there was no effect on all measures of quality of life, general menopausal symptoms, weight, body mass index, or most measures of cognitive function (105255,105258,105259).
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Although there has been interest in using oral cocoa for MS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of cocoa for this condition.
• Muscle strength. Oral cocoa seed extract has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy males shows that taking a combination product containing cocoa seed extract and pomegranate rind extract 400 mg daily for 8 weeks increases testosterone levels, hand grip strength, and upper arm circumference when compared with placebo (108485).
• Nipple fissures. It is unclear if topical cocoa butter is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of nipple fissures. Details: A small clinical study in breastfeeding adults shows that applying topical cocoa butter to the nipple and areola after each breastfeeding session for 10 days immediately postpartum reduces nipple pain, rashes, and cracks when compared with the topical application of the mother's breastmilk (111525). The validity of this study is limited by a lack of blinding and a high dropout rate.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for obesity. Details: Preliminary clinical research in overweight or obese premenopausal females shows that following a reduced-calorie diet in addition to consuming two squares of dark chocolate and drinking 8 ounces of a sugar-free cocoa beverage daily for 18 weeks does not increase weight loss when compared with the reduced-calorie diet plus a non-chocolate snack (42130,99983).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for Parkinson disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming a single dose of dark chocolate 200 grams containing approximately 80% cocoa does not improve motor function in patients with Parkinson disease when compared with a white chocolate control, although there seems to be some improvements after one hour when compared with baseline (42156).
• Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). It is unclear if oral cocoa is beneficial for PAD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with PAD shows that drinking a flavanol-rich cocoa beverage 15 grams daily for 6 months increases 6-minute walking distance by up to 43 meters when compared with placebo (103250). Cocoa has also been studied in adults with diabetes at risk for developing PAD, with conflicting results. A small clinical study in adults with and without diabetes shows that taking a single dose of cocoa flavanols 790 mg does not improve peripheral microvascular or macrovascular parameters compared with placebo (111529). However, another small clinical study in healthy adults and those with diabetes at risk for PAD shows that taking cocoa flavanols (CocoaVia, Mars Inc) 1350 mg improves endothelial function in the brachial and femoral arteries after 2 hours when compared with placebo, suggesting that cocoa flavanols might reduce the risk of developing PAD in both populations studied (111528). The validity of this study is limited by the small sample size and short study duration.
• Stroke. It is unclear if dietary cocoa is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Population research has found that the highest dietary intake of chocolate is associated with a 16% reduced risk of stroke when compared with the lowest intake (97192). More evidence is needed to rate cocoa for these uses.

(Read more about COCOA)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral creatine monohydrate seems to modestly improve rowing, jumping, and soccer performance. It is unclear if it is beneficial for sprinting, cycling, swimming, or tennis performance. Details: In competitive rowers, most clinical research shows that taking creatine 20 grams or 240-250 mg/kg daily for 5 days significantly improves aerobic and anaerobic performance (4605,4607,46569,46605,46833). Specifically, creatine decreases 1000-meter rowing time by 2.4 seconds and 2500-meter rowing time by 6.5 seconds and increases time to fatigue by 9.7 seconds when compared with placebo (4607,46605,46833). To improve rowing performance, creatine 20 grams (or 240-250 mg/kg) daily for 5 days has been used (4605,4607,46605,46833). Additionally, most clinical research shows that taking creatine 20-30 grams daily for 5-7 days improves jumping height by up to 6 cm when compared with placebo in active males (11331,13661,46626,46704), although some conflicting results exist (6924,46601). When compared with placebo, creatine also appears to improve spike jumping and block jumping in male volleyball players (46762), as well as peak and mean power of stationary roundhouse kicks in male trained taekwondo athletes (108333). In young male soccer players, preliminary clinical research shows that taking creatine 10 grams three times daily for 7 days can increase performance on a specific dribbling speed test by up to 2.8 seconds when compared with placebo (46626). In young female soccer players, preliminary clinical research shows that taking creatine 5 grams four times daily for 7 days followed by 5 grams daily for 5 weeks in conjunction with plyometric training modestly increases body mass index, jump and power performance, and repeated sprinting performance when compared with either plyometric training with placebo or standard soccer drills (95961). Research evaluating creatine supplementation for sprinting, cycling, high-intensity-interval training (HIIT), and swimming has been inconsistent. The reason for these mixed findings is unclear. A meta-analysis of small clinical trials shows that taking creatine decreases the peak oxygen uptake (VO2 max) during running and cycling, suggesting a worsening of aerobic fitness (108330). However, another meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials shows that taking creatine up to 20 grams orally daily for 3-7 days modestly improves mean power, but not peak power or fatigue, during repeated running or cycling sprint intervals when compared with placebo (112206). In addition, a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in trained athletes shows that taking creatine up to 20 grams orally daily for 5-42 days does not improve endurance running or cycling performance when compared with control (112214). A potential explanation for these conflicting results is that the studies failing to show an improvement are likely underpowered, with sample sizes of only 6-32 subjects (4582,4601). For instance, some small clinical trials show that taking creatine 20-30 grams daily for 5-7 days can improve sprint times by up to 3% and decrease time to exhaustion by up to 13% when compared with placebo in trained athletes (6924,11331,46558,46567,46626,46819); however, others show that taking creatine 20-25 grams daily for 3-7 days does not improve sprint velocity, 60-meter or 150-meter sprint times, or fatigue in these individuals (46603,46656,46797,46806,112216). In trained athletes, untrained yet healthy adults, and sedentary adults, some clinical research shows that taking creatine 10-35 grams daily for 4-7 days significantly improves power output, peak power, and fatigue indices while cycling (4591,4592,4593,4594,4602,4604,6926,10064,46522,46528) (46547,46568,46601,46614,46820); however, significant improvements in cycling performance with creatine are lacking in other studies (4582,4595,4596,4597,4598,4599,4600,4606,46520,46538) (46646). Similarly, in trained swimmers, some clinical research shows that creatine improves swimming performance (4601,4603,46600,46655,46725,46805), with a few studies reporting improvements of 1.3-2 seconds in 100-meter swim times when compared with placebo (46600,46725,46805). However, creatine does not improve 25-, 50-, or 100-meter swim performance in other trials (2106,4601,46798). To improve swimming performance, creatine 9-25 grams daily for 4-9 days has been used (4601,4603,46600,46655,46725,46805), with lower maintenance doses of 2.25-10 grams daily for 8-9 days used in some cases (4601,46600). Preliminary clinical research in trained tennis players shows that taking creatine 5 grams four times daily for 5 days or 0.3 grams/kg daily for 6 days followed by 0.03 grams/kg daily for 4 weeks does not appear to improve stroke power, stroke precision, serving speed, sprinting, or shuttle run time when compared with placebo (46536,46673). Taking creatine (Creapure, AlzChem AG) 0.3 grams/kg daily for 5 days, followed by 0.1 grams/kg daily for 23 days, while undergoing HITT 3 days each week does not improve physical performance outcomes when compared with placebo in healthy young females (95965). A preliminary clinical trial in elite female handball players shows that the beneficial effects of creatine monohydrate 0.3 grams/kg for 5 days followed by 0.03 grams/kg are not dependent on the time of day of supplementation (108332). Although this suggests that the circadian rhythm does not influence the ergogenic effect of creatine, this study was small and may have been underpowered to detect any differences. One clinical study in actively training firefighters shows that adding creatine 5 grams to daily supplemental protein and carbohydrates for 3 weeks reduces rescue and forcible entry times, but does not improve hose line advance, stair climb, or aerobic speed times, when compared with protein and carbohydrate supplementation alone (113673). One clinical study compared the efficacy of creatine monohydrate with that of creatine nitrate. At equivalent doses of 12 grams daily for 7 days, followed by 3 grams daily for 21 days, creatine nitrate and creatine monohydrate produce similar increases in fat-free mass, lean mass, and intramuscular creatine concentrations, and similar improvements in bench press lifting volume and average power output. The lower dose of creatine nitrate 6 grams daily for 7 days followed by 1.5 grams daily for 21 days does not demonstrate performance improvement benefits or result in increased intramuscular creatine (95959). In 2018, the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) recommended creatine monohydrate, but not creatine nitrate, as an ergogenic nutritional supplement for increasing athletic capacity and lean body mass (101009). Creatine has also been evaluated in combination with caffeine. A very small clinical study in healthy adult males shows that taking creatine 20 grams daily for a 5-day loading period and then adding caffeine 5 mg/kg daily for the next 3 days improves anaerobic power, but not anaerobic capacity, when compared with placebo (115980). Further research is needed to determine whether creatine is beneficial when taken with other erogenic ingredients.
• Cerebral creatine deficiency syndromes. Oral creatine seems to improve some symptoms of the cerebral creatine deficiency syndromes guanidinoacetate methyltransferase (GAMT) deficiency and arginine-glycine amidinotransferase (AGAT) deficiency. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial for creatine transporter defect. Details: Three inborn errors of metabolism, GAMT deficiency, AGAT deficiency, and creatine transporter defect, cause low cerebral creatine levels, resulting in mental retardation, seizures, autism, and movement disorders. In children with GAMT deficiency, taking creatine orally, 400-500 mg/kg daily for up to 8 years or 4-8 grams daily for up to 25 months, increases brain creatine levels and improves movement disorders and seizure frequency, but has little effect on intellectual ability (46722,46796,46804). Children with AGAT deficiency who take creatine 400-800 mg/kg daily for up to 8 years seem to have improved attention, language development, and academic performance (46584,46769). However, research in children up to 10 years of age with creatine transporter defect shows that taking a mixture of creatine, L-arginine, and glycine orally for 4-6 years does not increase brain creatine levels or improve motor or cognitive functioning (46757).
• Muscle strength. Oral creatine seems to modestly improve muscle strength. It is unclear if topical creatine is beneficial. Details: Pooled analyses of clinical trials assessing upper limb strength, lower limb strength, and body composition have evaluated creatine provided in typical loading doses of 20 grams daily or 0.3 grams/kg daily, although doses up to 26 grams daily have been used, in single or divided doses for 5-7 days (90323,90330,93626,93627,108316,108336,112213). Creatine maintenance doses ranged from 1.25-27 grams daily for up to 32 weeks (90323,90330,93626,93627,108316,108336,115978). In some studies, creatine doses of usually 0.1 grams/kg have been taken daily for up to 12 months in the absence of a loading dose. In others, creatine was taken only on training days (108316). Meta-analyses of research in the general adult population show that taking creatine with or without resistance training seems to improve handgrip strength, upper limb strength, and lower limb strength, with a small-to-moderate overall effect (93626,93627). In combination with resistance training, creatine also appears to be beneficial for upper and/or lower limb strength in older adults and those at risk for functional disability, although benefits on both domains have not been demonstrated in all analyses (90323,90330,108316,108336,115978). A meta-analysis limited to studies involving older females shows that while taking creatine with resistance training increases upper body strength when compared with placebo, improvements to lower body strength are limited to those studies providing supplementation for at least 24 weeks (108336). Meta-analyses of studies involving middle-aged adults, older adults, and those with chronic conditions at risk for functional disability show that creatine supplementation combined with resistance training appears to increase total body mass by 1 kg and lean body mass by 0.9-1.3 kg when compared with placebo (90323,90330,108316,115978). However, other meta-analyses of studies in older adults show no effect of creatine combined with resistance exercise on muscle mass or absolute fat mass, while effects on body fat percentage are inconsistent (90323,108335,108336,113671). While the analyses above provide a good estimate of creatine's effect on muscle strength, it is important to note that a large number of clinical trials assessing strength in patients taking creatine have been published. These studies included varying methodologies, small sample sizes, and a wide range of creatine doses, dosing times, and study durations. These differences may explain why some studies have found a benefit with creatine supplementation (2100,2101,4580,6015,6924,6928,10062,13661,46507,46510)(46523,46528,46550,46551,46561,46562,46567,46570,46581,46589)(46601,46613,46615,46618,46626,46628,46667,46709,46720,46725)(46761,46762,46801,46815,90321,90327,95958,95960,102162,103279)(104668,104670,108329,112213,112793), while others have not (4569,4570,4571,4572,4588,6183,46520,46539,46554,46569)(46579,46594,46656,46665,46673,95963,95967,95968,95969,102168,104669)(104671,108334). Topical creatine has also been evaluated. Applying 3.5 mL of a specific cream (Delivra, LivCorp Inc.) containing creatine 1% daily for 7 days moderately improves peak and average muscle power in healthy males when compared with a placebo cream. However, some study participants were also taking oral creatine monohydrate 7 grams three times daily and others were taking an oral placebo. An acute application of the cream at doses of 3.5 mL or 7 mL 30 minutes before exercise does not improve power (104669).
• Sarcopenia. When used for up to 12 weeks in combination with resistance training, oral creatine seems to modestly improve muscle strength in older adults. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial when used as a single dose or for more than 12 weeks. Details: Most research shows that taking creatine while taking part in a resistance training program can increase upper and/or lower body muscle strength in older adults (90323,90330,95958,102162,108316,108336). One meta-analysis of research in adults 50 years of age and older taking part in resistance training programs shows that creatine supplementation improves chest press strength with a moderate effect size, but does not improve leg press strength, when compared with placebo (90330). Also, another meta-analysis focusing on adults 45 years of age and older taking part in resistance training shows that creatine supplementation improves chest press strength by 1.74 kg and leg press strength by 3.25 kg when compared with placebo, with no effect on knee extension or biceps curl measurements (90323). A meta-analysis limited to studies involving older females shows that while taking creatine with resistance training increases upper body strength when compared with placebo, improvements to lower body strength are limited to those studies providing supplementation for at least 24 weeks (108336). However, some negative findings exist. Some clinical research in postmenopausal females with osteopenia shows that taking creatine monohydrate 1-3 grams (Creapure, AlzChem AG) daily for 1-2 years without participation in resistance training does not alter muscle function when compared with placebo (95969,102168). In addition, in healthy males aged 49-69 years, a small clinical trial shows that taking creatine monohydrate (Rivalus Inc.) 0.05 grams/kg twice daily, while undergoing supervised resistance training three days each week for one year, does not alter muscle strength when compared with placebo (104671). One clinical study shows that a single loading dose of creatine monohydrate 20 grams (Creapure, AlzCHem AG) taken 3 hours prior to exercise does not improve leg press or chest press muscle endurance in aging males (95968). Also, lower doses of creatine added to whey protein supplementation do not seem to be beneficial. One small study in adults 65 years or older shows that adding creatine monohydrate 2.5 grams twice daily along with whey protein 10 grams twice daily and resistance training for 14 weeks does not improve muscle function when compared with whey protein and resistance training alone (95966). Most research also suggests that creatine improves total muscle mass in older adults, although conflicting research exists. Some studies show that taking creatine while taking part in a resistance training program seems to increase muscle mass in older adults (90323,90330,108316,108329). Meta-analyses of studies involving middle-aged and older adults show that creatine supplementation combined with resistance training appears to increase total body mass by 1 kg and lean body mass by 0.9-1.3 kg when compared with placebo (90323,90330,108316). However, a meta-analysis of studies limited to older females shows that there was no effect of creatine on muscle mass (108336). Also, in healthy males aged 49-69 years, a small clinical trial shows that taking creatine monohydrate (Rivalus Inc.) 0.05 grams/kg twice daily, while undergoing supervised resistance training three days each week for one year, does not alter body composition when compared with placebo (104671). Despite these generally beneficial findings, significant decreases in fat mass following creatine supplementation in older adults are lacking, and effects on body fat percentage are inconsistent (90323,95958,108335).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). Oral creatine does not seem to reduce ALS symptoms or increase survival. Details: Taking creatine orally, 5-10 grams daily for 9-16 months, or 20 grams daily for 5-7 days followed by 3-5 grams daily for 6 months, has no effect on disease progression, respiratory function decline, or survival in patients with ALS (11332,16389,46553,46574,46707). In one case series, some patients experienced temporary improvement in muscle strength while taking 20 grams daily during the first week, but this was not maintained (46553).
• Huntington disease. Oral creatine does not seem to reduce symptoms of this condition. Details: Taking creatine orally has no effect on motor function or symptom scores in people with Huntington disease (46598,46609,95957). Clinical research shows that taking creatine 5-40 grams daily (average dose of 31.6 grams) for 24 months does not improve total motor score or total functional capacity in patients with early manifest Huntington disease (95957).
• Osteopenia. Oral creatine does not seem to be beneficial for osteopenia. Details: In postmenopausal adults with osteopenia, taking creatine monohydrate (Creapure, AlzChem GmbH ) 1-3 grams daily for 1-2 years does not improve bone mineral density (BMD) when compared with placebo (95969,102168). Another clinical trial in postmenopausal adults with osteopenia or osteoporosis shows that taking creatine monohydrate (Probiotica) 20 grams daily for 5 days and then 5 grams daily for the next 23 weeks, with or without exercise training, does not improve bone mass when compared with placebo (90321). Also, a small clinical trial in older adults, most of which had osteopenia, shows that taking creatine monohydrate (Rivalus Inc.) 0.05 grams/kg twice daily in combination with resistance training for 12 months modestly improves some measures of bone area, but not BMD, when compared with placebo (108329). Other research has evaluated creatine in patients without a definite diagnosis of osteopenia. One study shows that taking creatine (Rivalus Inc.) 0.1 gram/kg daily for 12 months or creatine (Creapure AlzChem Trostberg GmbH) 0.1 grams/kg three times weekly does not affect BMD in adults age 50 and up taking part in resistance training (104671,104674). In contrast, a small clinical trial in postmenopausal patients shows that taking creatine monohydrate (Rivalus Inc.) 0.1 gram/kg daily for 12 months while undergoing a resistance training program has a small preventive effect on bone loss at the femoral neck, but not the hip or spine (104673). However, other preliminary clinical research in postmenopausal patients shows that taking creatine (Creapure, AlzChem AG) 0.14 grams/kg orally daily for 2 years does not improve BMD when compared with placebo (112219). Also, preliminary clinical research shows that taking creatine 0.3 grams/kg for 5 days and 0.07 grams/kg for the remainder of a 12-week resistance training session increases BMD in elderly males over 70 years (46664). More information is needed to determine if creatine is beneficial when used in combination with a resistance training program in older adults.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of age-related cognitive decline. Details: Population research in the US has found a positive association between dietary creatine intake and a specific measure of cognitive function, the WAIS III Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSS). In addition, this measure of cognitive function was highest in individuals who consumed more than 0.95 grams daily (108331). However, clinical research is conflicting. A small clinical trial in older adults shows that taking creatine monohydrate (Creapure, Deguss AG) 5 grams four times daily for one week has modest beneficial effects on some measures of cognitive function, but not others, when compared with baseline or placebo (46686). Another small clinical trial shows that taking creatine monohydrate 5 grams four times daily for five days, and then 5 grams daily for a total of 4 weeks, does not improve cognitive function when compared with placebo (108339).
• Aging skin. Topical creatine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a cream containing creatine 0.2%, guarana 0.4%, and glycerol 8% to the face daily for 6 weeks reduces wrinkles and skin sagging when compared to baseline (46766). Other research shows that a specific cream containing creatine 0.2% and folic acid 0.03% (Nivea Visage DNAage, Beiersdorf AG) reduces wrinkles and roughness and improves firmness of photo-aged skin when compared to baseline (46696). The effect of topical creatine alone on aging skin is unclear. Also, the validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Arsenic poisoning. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with arsenic poisoning. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults regularly consuming well water that contains arsenic shows that taking creatine 3 grams orally daily for 12 weeks lowers the concentration of certain serum arsenic metabolites when compared with control (112212). Creatine has not been studied for management of acute arsenic poisoning.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial for improving post-viral CFS. Details: A very small clinical study in adults who developed CFS after COVID-19 shows that taking creatine 4 grams with breakfast daily for 6 months improves body aches and the ability to concentrate, but does not affect fatigue levels or time to exhaustion, when compared with an inulin placebo (113487). Although many other CFS-related symptoms were evaluated in this study, no statistical methods were implemented to control for multiplicity, limiting the interpretation of any additional findings.
• Chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in adults with CKD. Details: A small clinical study in adults with CKD undergoing hemodialysis shows that taking creatine monohydrate 20 grams daily for a week alternating with 5 grams daily for a week, for a total of 4 weeks, attenuates loss of lean body mass and reduces the malnutrition-inflammation score when compared with taking a maltodextrin control (102166). However, another very small clinical study evaluating the same regimen over a period of 12 months shows no improvement in malnutrition-inflammation score, body composition, strength, or endurance when compared with a maltodextrin control (115981).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with COPD. Details: One clinical study shows that taking creatine 22 grams daily for 5 days, then 3.76 grams daily for 6 weeks, does not improve pulmonary function or walking distance when compared with placebo (46699). Another study shows taking creatine 5.7 grams three times daily for 2 weeks, then once daily thereafter, improves patient self-assessment of lung function, but not exercise capacity, when compared with placebo (46658). A third study shows taking creatine 0.3 grams/kg for 7 days, then 0.07 grams/kg for 7 weeks, improves walking time, but not measures of lung function, when compared with placebo (46691). A meta-analysis of the results from these and other clinical trials shows that creatine does not improve exercise capacity, muscle strength, or quality of life in COPD patients. However, the studies analyzed were of varying quality, which may limit the validity of these findings (46740).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial for improving cognitive function. Details: Some preliminary clinical research in healthy adults shows that taking creatine possibly improves some measures of cognitive performance, specifically short-term memory and reasoning. However, findings related to most measures of cognitive function are inconsistent (108340). Other clinical research in healthy adults shows that taking a specific creatine product (Creapure, AlzChem) 5-20 grams orally daily for 6 weeks does not improve cognitive function, abstract reasoning, or working memory when compared with placebo (112215,113486).
• Congestive heart failure (CHF). It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with CHF. Details: Two very small clinical studies show that taking creatine orally 20 grams daily for 5-10 days improves skeletal muscle strength and endurance, but not ejection fraction or symptoms of CHF, when compared with placebo (4562,4563). Also a small clinical study in males with class II-IV heart failure shows that taking creatine 5 grams daily for 6 months does not improve exercise capacity or ejection fraction when compared with placebo (90328). However, it is possible that these small studies were inadequately powered to detect a difference in these clinical outcomes.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial for improving symptoms of depression. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking creatine 5 grams daily for 8 weeks improves response to escitalopram in females with major depressive disorder. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) scores decreased by 80% when compared to baseline in those receiving creatine plus escitalopram, compared to a decrease of only 63% in those taking placebo plus escitalopram (46777). However, the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce recommend against use of creatine for depression until more conclusive data are generated (110318).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial for glycemic control. Details: A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research shows that taking creatine does not affect levels of fasting blood glucose or measures of insulin resistance when compared with placebo (108338). However, most of the studies included in this analysis were not conducted in individuals with diabetes. In people with newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetes, preliminary clinical studies show a reduction in postprandial glucose levels after taking creatine 3-6 grams orally daily for 5 days (46732,46760). The studies show that creatine 3 grams once daily has similar effects to glyburide 3.5 mg daily, and that creatine 3 grams twice daily is similar to metformin 500 mg twice daily. The effects of treatment for longer than 5 days in patients with diabetes are unknown. However, in sedentary males without diabetes, taking creatine 10 grams daily for 3 months seems to improve glucose tolerance (46682).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial for cognitive fatigue prevention. Details: A small clinical study in healthy young adults with mental fatigue shows that taking creatine monohydrate (Sportimaxx) 20 grams daily for 7 days improves accuracy on prolonged cognitive tasks, but not cognitive measures that require a quick response, when compared with placebo (102170).
• Fibromyalgia. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial for improving exercise performance in patients with fibromyalgia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking creatine 5 grams orally four times daily for 5 days, followed by 5 grams daily for a total of 16 weeks, improves leg press strength by 10% and chest press strength by 8% when compared with placebo in patients with fibromyalgia. However, creatine supplementation does not appear to improve aerobic capacity, pain, sleep, quality of life, or cognitive function (90331).
• Gyrate atrophy. Anecdotal reports suggest that oral creatine may be beneficial in some patients with gyrate atrophy. Details: Gyrate atrophy of the choroid and retina is associated with elevated plasma ornithine levels, which inhibit creatine synthesis and result in muscle fiber atrophy and eye fundus damage. Left untreated, patients with this condition progressively lose their vision (4577,4578). A small case series suggests that taking creatine 1.5 grams daily for one year might slow eye damage and visual deterioration in some patients with this condition when compared to baseline (4578). The validity of this finding is limited by the small sample size and lack of a comparator group.
• Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with hereditary motor sensory neuropathies. Details: Preliminary clinical studies in people with hereditary motor sensory neuropathies, such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease, suggest that taking creatine orally 5 grams daily for 1-12 weeks has no effect on muscle strength, endurance, or functional capacity when compared with placebo (46548,46630,46675,46695).
• HIV/AIDS-related wasting. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with muscle wasting associated with HIV. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking creatine orally 20 grams daily for 5 days, then 4.8 grams daily for 14 weeks, does not increase muscle mass or strength in patients with HIV with muscle wasting when compared with placebo (46718).
• Hyperhomocysteinemia. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with hyperhomocysteinemia. Details: Preliminary clinical research in strict vegan adults with hyperhomocysteinemia shows that taking micronized creatine monohydrate (Bioderm) 5 grams daily for 3 weeks reduces blood levels of homocysteine by 39% when compared with baseline (102169). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Inflammatory myopathies. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Details: Preliminary clinical research in people with dermatomyositis or polymyositis shows that taking creatine orally 20 grams daily for 8 days, followed by 3 grams daily for a total of 6 months, in addition to an exercise program, decreases aggregate functional performance time by around 7% and increases shoulder abduction and hip flexion strength when compared with placebo. However, no improvements in functional index or strength as measured by elbow flexion, knee extension, or dorsi flexion are reported (15520). Taking creatine does not seem to improve muscle strength or disease activity in patients aged 7-18 years with juvenile dermatomyositis. Preliminary clinical research shows that taking creatine (AlzChem) for 4 weeks to 6 months does not improve muscle strength or disease activity when compared with placebo. The doses used in this study were 150 mg/kg daily for children weighing up to 40 kg or 4.69 grams/m2 for those weighing over 40 kg (104672).
• Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Oral creatine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In children with JIA, taking a specific supplement (Kre-Celazine; All American Pharmaceutical) containing creatine and fatty acids 750 mg twice daily for 30 days may improve pain and inflammation when compared to baseline. Pain scores were reduced to 0 or 1 in 81% of these patients, and laboratory measures of inflammation were normalized in nearly every patient (90322). However, the effect of creatine alone in JIA patients is unclear. Also, the validity of this study is limited by a lack of control group.
• McArdle disease. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial for this condition. Details: There is some preliminary clinical evidence that taking creatine orally, 150 mg/kg daily for 5 days, followed by 60 mg/kg daily for 5 weeks, improves frequency and/or severity of muscle pain in some, but not all, patients with McArdle disease (70). However, continuing with the higher dose of 150 mg/kg daily throughout the 5-week period seems to INCREASE muscle pain and exercise intolerance (46564).
• Memory. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial for improving memory. Details: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy adults shows that taking creatine 2.2-20 grams orally for 5 days to 24 weeks improves performance on certain memory tests when compared with placebo (112202). However, the validity of this study is limited by high heterogeneity. In addition, the statistical methods utilized in this meta-analysis are likely to increase the risk of false positive results (112203) and re-analysis using other methods failed to reproduce the significant effects of creatine (112204).
• Mitochondrial myopathies. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with mitochondrial myopathies. Details: Preliminary studies using creatine orally for mitochondrial myopathies, such as chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia and Kearns-Sayre syndrome, show mixed results. Using 150 mg/kg daily for 6 weeks or 20 grams daily for 4 weeks does not improve muscle function, exercise performance, or ease of completing activities of daily living when compared with placebo (46529,46650,104675). However, one very small clinical study shows that taking creatine 5 grams twice daily for 14 days, then 2 grams twice daily for 7 days, improves some measures of strength during high-intensity anaerobic and aerobic exercise, but not low-intensity exercise, when compared with baseline (4565).
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with MS. Details: A very small clinical study shows that taking creatine 20 grams orally daily for 5 days does not improve exercise capacity in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis when compared with placebo (46599).
• Muscle breakdown. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial for muscle breakdown prevention. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking creatine 5 grams four times daily for 7 days seems to help maintain muscle mass and reduce loss of muscle strength associated with immobilization by a cast in young males aged 18-25 years (46713).
• Muscle cramps. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with muscle cramps related to hemodialysis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking creatine 12 grams orally 5 minutes before hemodialysis sessions for 4 weeks reduces the frequency of muscle cramps by around 60%, from an average of 6.4 episodes to 2.6 episodes over the course of 4 weeks of dialysis. No reduction in muscle cramp frequency is reported with placebo in these patients (46582).
• Muscular dystrophy. The evidence for the use of oral creatine in patients with various forms of muscular dystrophy is conflicting. Details: Preliminary studies have assessed oral creatine in patients with muscular dystrophy, including Duchenne dystrophy, Becker dystrophy, facioscapulohumeral dystrophy, sarcoglycan-deficient limb girdle muscular dystrophy, and myotonic dystrophies. Although a meta-analysis of available research shows that there is a small benefit of creatine on muscle strength in patients with muscular dystrophies, results of individual clinical trials have been inconsistent (104675). Some preliminary clinical research shows that measures of muscle strength or fatigue are improved after 8-16 weeks of treatment with creatine 3-5 grams or 0.1 gram/kg daily (6182,46596,46629,46739). Also, subjective improvement in muscle strength occurs in some people taking creatine 20 grams daily for one week, followed by 5 grams daily for 8 weeks (46639). The ability to perform activities of daily living improves only modestly, if at all (6182,46629,46739). Despite these positive results, some conflicting results exist. Some studies show no improvement in muscle strength or functional capacity with doses of 5 grams daily for 17-26 weeks (46616,46657), or 10.6 grams daily for 10 days followed by 5.3 grams daily for a total of 8 weeks (46587). Also, a dose of 10 grams daily for 12 weeks does not appear to improve muscle strength, although it seems to improve myalgia in some patients (10654). The inconsistent results reported in patients with muscular dystrophy may be explained by the different types of muscular dystrophies, the varied methodologies, or the small number of patients assessed. Studies failing to show an improvement with creatine may be underpowered, with sample sizes of only 20-60 (10654,46657).
• Neonatal apnea. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial for neonatal apnea treatment. Details: A preliminary clinical study shows that giving creatine orally 200 mg/kg daily for 2 weeks to premature infants with a gestational age of less than 32 weeks does not improve signs or symptoms of apnea of prematurity when compared with placebo (46623).
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with osteoarthritis. Details: In patients with osteoarthritis of the knee, preliminary clinical research shows that taking creatine 20 grams orally daily for one week, followed by 5 grams daily for 11 weeks, in combination with strengthening exercises, modestly improves physical functioning as measured by the number of stand-ups performed from a standard-height chair in 30 seconds when compared with exercise alone. Stiffness, pain, and quality of life were also improved with creatine supplementation; however, it is unclear if these improvements were significant when compared with exercise alone (46753).
• Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with this condition. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking creatine 5 grams twice daily for 12-18 months decreases the rate of disease progression when compared with placebo in patients who have not started conventional medications for symptom control (15353,46703). However, preliminary clinical research in patients with more advanced disease who have already started conventional medications shows that taking creatine 20 grams daily for 6 days followed by 2 grams daily for 6 months, and then 4 grams daily for 18 months does not decrease overall progression of symptoms or the need to start symptomatic treatment. However, increases in dopamine agonist doses were 3-fold lower over the course of the study in patients receiving creatine when compared with placebo (15354).
• Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with PAD. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with PAD shows that taking creatine monohydrate (Creapure, AlzChem Trostberg GmbH) 5 grams four times daily for one week, followed by 5 grams daily for the next 7 weeks, does not improve functional capacity based on walking distance, upper body strength, or lower body strength, when compared with placebo (108337). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect differences between groups.
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial for improving physical performance in older patients and those at risk for functional disability. Details: A meta-analysis of 15 clinical studies in healthy older adults and adults of any age with chronic disease who are at risk for functional disability shows that taking oral creatine, usually at a dose of 5 grams daily, for 5 days to 32 weeks, improves lower extremity physical function, upper limb and hand strength, and lean tissue mass when compared with control. Taking creatine does not improve lower limb strength, functional mobility, walking time, or aerobic capacity. Subgroup analyses suggest that improvements are greater with an extended duration of creatine use. Additionally, combining creatine with resistance training may increase benefits for lower extremity physical function, upper body strength, and lean tissue mass (115978). The heterogeneity of the included patient populations limits the practical applicability of these findings.
• Post-stroke fatigue. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with post-stroke fatigue. Details: Very preliminary clinical research in patients undergoing progressive resistance training after a stroke shows that taking a specific creatine supplement (Creapure, AlzChem Trostberg GmbH) 0.3 grams/kg orally daily for 7 days, followed by 0.1 grams/kg orally daily for a total of 10 weeks modestly improves 6-minute walk test distance when compared with placebo (112207).
• Postoperative recovery. Small clinical studies suggest that oral creatine may not improve recovery of muscle strength after knee surgery. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking creatine 20 grams daily for 7 days, followed by 5 grams daily for 11 weeks, does not improve recovery of muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery in young adults when compared with placebo (46622). Other preliminary research shows that taking creatine 10 grams daily for 10 days before total knee arthroplasty, followed by 5 grams daily for 30 days after surgery, does not improve muscle strength or functional recovery when compared with placebo (46659). These studies are limited by small size and variability in patient population and supplementation regimen.
• Rett syndrome. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with this condition. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking creatine 200 mg/kg daily for 6 months does not improve symptom scores when compared with placebo in patients aged 3-25 years with Rett syndrome (46759).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Oral creatine does not seem to improve disease activity in patients with RA, but it might improve muscle strength. Details: Clinical research in adults with RA shows that taking creatine increases lean muscle mass, total body mass, and muscle strength, but does not alter disease activity or improve strength or physical function, when compared with placebo or a control group (6929,95964). Creatine was taken as 5 grams four times daily for 5 days, followed by 3 grams daily for 12 weeks, in one study and 5 grams four times daily for 5 days, followed by 0.5 grams four times daily for 16 days, in the other study (6929).
• Schizophrenia. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in adults with schizophrenia. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking creatine orally, 3 grams daily for one month followed by 5 grams daily for 2 months, does not improve symptom control or cognitive function in adults with schizophrenia when compared with placebo (16390).
• Sleep deprivation. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in adults who are subjected to sleep deprivation. Details: A small crossover study in healthy adults aged 20-28 years shows that taking a single oral dose of creatine 0.35 g/kg prior to sleep deprivation attenuates fatigue and cognitive decline over the next 7 hours when compared with placebo (115979).
• Spinal cord injury. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with spinal cord injury. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking creatine orally, 20 grams daily for 7 days, increases exercise capacity by improving respiratory function in patients with spinal cord injury (cervical level C5-7) when compared with placebo (46563). However, other preliminary clinical research shows that patients with similar injuries taking creatine 10 grams twice daily for 6 days, followed by 5 grams daily, do not have significant improvements in wrist muscle or hand function (46660).
• Spinal muscular atrophy. It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in patients with spinal muscular atrophy. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that children with type II or III spinal muscular atrophy do not benefit from taking creatine orally for 6 months (46841). Doses were 2 grams daily for children aged 2-5 years, and 5 grams daily for children aged 5-18 years.
• Traumatic brain injury (TBI). It is unclear if oral creatine is beneficial in children with a TBI. Details: In children and adolescents who have suffered a TBI, preliminary clinical research shows that taking creatine orally 0.4 grams/kg daily for 6 months reduces the duration of post-traumatic amnesia by 60 days. It also reduces the risk of headache by 88%, fatigue by 87%, and dizziness by 80% when compared with control. There is also a trend towards reduced duration of intubation and total time in the intensive care unit or hospital (46694). More evidence is needed to rate creatine for these uses.

(Read more about CREATINE)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Pellagra. Oral niacinamide is approved for the treatment of pellagra and niacin deficiency. Details: Niacinamide is FDA-approved for the prevention and treatment of niacin deficiency and pellagra. Niacinamide is sometimes preferred over niacin for this indication because it lacks the vasodilating and flushing effects of niacin (15,6243).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Acne. Topical niacinamide seems to improve acne symptoms in some patients. Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One clinical study shows that applying niacinamide 4% gel twice daily for 8 weeks is as effective as clindamycin 1% gel for reducing the number and severity of acne lesions. The niacinamide gel appears to be more effective in patients with oily skin than those with non-oily skin (93360). Other preliminary clinical research in adults with mild to moderate acne vulgaris shows that applying niacinamide 5% cream twice daily, 10 minutes after applying benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel, for 12 weeks reduces the number of acne lesions, but not erythema or inflammation, when compared with benzoyl peroxide alone (107711). Niacinamide has also been studied in combination with other ingredients. In preliminary clinical research, oral niacinamide has been reported to improve acne when used in combination with zinc, copper, and folic acid (Nicomide) (25557), or in combination with azelaic acid, zinc, pyridoxine, copper, and folic acid (NicAzel, Elorac Inc.) (90800). In a small observational study, topical niacinamide 4% combined with gallic acid 1% and lauric acid 1% was associated with some improvement in acne (104931). It is unclear if the effects in these studies are due to niacinamide, other ingredients, or the combinations.
• Diabetes. Oral niacinamide does not seem to prevent the onset of type 1 diabetes, although it might slow its progression. Details: Although some older research has suggested that taking high-dose niacinamide can reduce the risk of type 1 diabetes in high-risk children (4874), results from higher quality, more rigorous clinical trials show that taking niacinamide up to 3 grams daily for 5 years does not prevent the onset of type 1 diabetes in first-degree relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes (4875,25553,25554). However, taking niacinamide 1.2 grams/m2 daily for 5 years may prevent the loss of beta-cell function in these patients (25555). Also, there is evidence showing that niacinamide can preserve residual beta-cell function in patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes (4877,4878,4879,4880,25556). Clinical trials, including one placebo-controlled trial and one vitamin E-comparison study, show niacinamide can prolong the "honeymoon period" in those newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, when the pancreas is still capable of producing some insulin (4877,4878,4879,4880,25556). However, some scientists have raised concerns about potential induction of insulin resistance with short-term use of niacinamide 2 grams daily for 2 weeks (4881). Niacinamide has also been evaluated in adults with type 2 diabetes. A small clinical study in lean patients with type 2 diabetes who failed sulfonylurea therapy shows that taking niacinamide 500 mg three times daily for 6 months in addition to continuing insulin or a sulfonylurea increases C-peptide release and improves insulin secretion when compared with insulin alone (4882).
• Hyperphosphatemia. Adding oral niacinamide to standard treatment with phosphate binders further lowers blood levels of phosphorus in patients on hemodialysis. Details: A meta-analysis of nine small clinical trials in patients on hemodialysis with hyperphosphatemia who are using a phosphate binder shows that taking niacinamide 250-1500 mg daily for 2-6 months lowers serum phosphorus and parathyroid hormone levels when compared with placebo (98940) Another meta-analysis of two small clinical trials in the same patient population also shows that taking niacinamide, titrated from 500 mg to 1500 mg daily over 8 weeks, reduces serum phosphorus levels by about 0.9 mg/dL when compared with placebo (94188). Other clinical research in this population shows that taking modified-release niacinamide 250-1500 mg orally daily for 12-24 weeks also lowers serum phosphate and parathyroid levels when compared with placebo. However, these effects were not maintained at 40-52 weeks follow-up (107709,110499). In addition, this product was not compared with immediate-release niacinamide. Niacinamide has also been studied in place of phosphate binders. One small clinical study in patients on hemodialysis with hyperphosphatemia shows that taking niacinamide 500-1750 mg daily for 12 weeks, beginning 2 weeks after discontinuation of phosphate binders, decreases serum phosphorus levels by 1.5 mg/dL and intact parathyroid hormone levels by 50 pg/mL, without affecting calcium levels, when compared to baseline (25561).The validity of these findings is limited due to the lack of a control group.
• Osteoarthritis. Oral high-dose niacinamide might be beneficial for improving osteoarthritis symptoms. Details: Clinical research in patients with osteoarthritis shows that taking niacinamide 3 grams daily in six divided doses for 12 weeks improves joint flexibility, reduces inflammation, and modestly decreases use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) when compared with placebo (4883).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Brain tumor. Adding high-dose oral niacinamide to chemotherapy does not seem to improve survival in patients with brain tumors. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with surgically resected brain tumors shows that treatment with radiotherapy, niacinamide, and carbogen does not improve survival when compared with radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy plus carbogen (11695,11696).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Actinic keratoses. It is unclear if oral or topical niacinamide is beneficial for reducing actinic keratoses. Research results are conflicting. Details: A large clinical trial in healthy Australian adults with actinic keratoses shows that taking a specific niacinamide product (Insolar, Blackmores) 500 mg twice daily for 12 months reduces the number of actinic keratoses by 13% when compared with placebo. The difference between the 2 groups was observed as early as 3 months after starting niacinamide (93362). Additionally, a small clinical study in healthy, older Australian adults with actinic keratoses shows that taking niacinamide (Nature's Own, Virginia) 500 mg once or twice daily for 4 months reduces the total number of actinic keratoses by 29% and 35%, respectively, when compared with placebo (93365). However, a large clinical trial in solid organ transplant recipients in Australia shows that taking a specific niacinamide product (Insolar, Blackmores) 500 mg twice daily for 6 months does not reduce the number of actinic keratoses when compared with placebo (113559). Also, a small clinical trial in kidney transplant recipients with actinic keratoses and a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer shows that taking niacinamide 500 mg twice daily for 12 months does not decrease the number of actinic keratoses when compared with placebo (113682). The study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. Two small clinical studies conducted in Brazil in elderly adults with actinic keratoses shows that taking niacinamide 500 mg twice daily for 120 days or applying a cream containing niacinamide 5% twice daily for 56 days does not reduce the number of actinic keratoses when compared with placebo (107714,113684). Most studies were conducted in countries with high year-round ultraviolet radiation exposure, such as Australia and Brazil; results may not be readily extrapolated to populations in other geographic regions.
• Age-related cognitive decline. Although there is interest in using oral niacinamide for age-related cognitive decline, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacinamide for this purpose.
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study in patients with early-stage age-related maculopathy shows that taking a combination of niacinamide 18 mg, vitamin E 20 mg, and lutein 15 mg daily for nearly a year improves retinal function when compared with no treatment (60134). It is unclear if this effect is due to niacinamide, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Aging skin. It is unclear if topical niacinamide improves symptoms of aging skin. Details: A small study in females with signs of facial photo-aging shows that applying niacinamide 5% cream to half of the face twice daily for 12 weeks improves blotchiness, the appearance of wrinkles, skin elasticity, and skin pigmentation when compared with applying placebo cream to the other half of the face (25551).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if topical niacinamide improves eczema symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients with atopic dermatitis and dry skin shows that applying niacinamide 2% cream twice daily for 8 weeks decreases skin water loss and improves skin hydration when compared with using a white petrolatum moisturizer (25560). A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with mild atopic dermatitis (AD) shows that applying a specific niacinamide containing body emollient (Bioderma Atoderm PP Baume, Bioderma Cosmetics Trading Co., Ltd.) 250 grams weekly, applied twice daily for 28 days with or without pre-cleansing with a specific niacinamide containing gel wash (Atoderm Intensive Gel Moussant, Bioderma Cosmetics Trading Co., Ltd.), improves AD severity, itching, trans-epidermal water loss, skin water content, and dermatological quality of life when compared with a control emollient and water-only skin cleansing. Additionally, using both the niacinamide containing emollient and cleansing gel improves trans-epidermal water loss and skin water content sooner when compared with niacin containing emollient only (113681). However, the study may have been inadequately powered and too short in duration to detect additional differences between the 2 niacinamide groups.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other vitamins; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children with ADHD shows that taking a maximum of niacinamide 3 grams, ascorbic acid 3 grams, calcium pantothenate 1.2 grams, and pyridoxine 600 mg daily for 3 months seems to improve behavior in 29% of participants when compared with baseline (9957). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Bladder cancer. Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with carbogen for improving survival in advanced bladder cancer; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A phase II clinical study in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer shows that adding inhaled carbogen and oral niacinamide 40-60 mg/kg about 2 hours before radiotherapy shows a trend to improved survival at 3 years when compared with inhaled carbogen and radiotherapy (25558), and a larger phase III study shows that carbogen and oral niacinamide improves 3-year survival by about 13% when compared with radiotherapy alone (93366). An observational follow-up of the phase III study found a trend to increased survival at 5 years in the carbogen and niacinamide group when compared with radiotherapy alone. And in a subgroup of patients with tumor necrosis, the 5-year survival was significantly greater with carbogen and niacinamide when compared with radiotherapy alone (93356). It is unclear if these effects are due to niacinamide, carbogen, or the combination.
• Child growth. It is unclear if oral niacinamide improves child growth. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children in rural Tanzania shows that supplementing niacinamide orally from birth to 18 months of age does not improve length-for-age, weight-for-age, or head circumference when compared with control. Niacinamide was initially supplemented to breast-feeding mothers, 250 mg daily, until 6 months of age, followed by 100 mg daily taken by the child until 18 months of age (107713).
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral niacinamide is beneficial for COVID-19. Details: Observational research in adults with acute kidney injury secondary to coronavirus disease-19 infection has found that taking niacinamide 1000 mg orally daily for 7 days is associated with a 55% lower risk of mortality when compared with control. However, taking niacinamide was not associated with a lower risk of renal replacement therapy (110500).
• Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). It is unclear if topical niacinamide is beneficial for CLE. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with discoid lupus erythematosus, a type of CLE, shows that applying topical niacinamide 2% to 4% twice daily for 12 weeks modestly improves lesion scores, but not quality of life scores, when compared with placebo. However, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (110498).
• Depression. Although there is interest in using oral niacinamide for depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacinamide for this condition.
• Diabetic neuropathy. Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with diabetic polyneuropathy shows that taking a specific combination product (Cytoflavin, Polysan) containing niacinamide, inosine, riboflavin, and succinate daily for 12 weeks improves symptom scores, including paresthesia and numbness scores, when compared with placebo. The therapy was first administered intravenously, providing niacinamide 200 mg, inosine 400 mg, riboflavin 40 mg, and succinate 2000 mg daily for 10 days, followed by an oral formulation providing niacinamide 100 mg, inosine 200 mg, riboflavin 20 mg, and succinate 1200 mg daily for the remainder of the study (110503).
• Erythema. Topical niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: There is interest in using niacinamide to reduce the side effects of topical tretinoin, including erythema. A small preliminary clinical study in patients using isotretinoin for acne shows that applying a specific cream (Sebiaclear Hydra, SVr Laboratoire Dermatologique) containing niacinamide 5% and omega-ceramides 8% twice daily for 6 months reduces isotretinoin-induced erythema, dryness, and itching of the skin when compared with a glycerin placebo (98938). It is not clear if this effect is due to niacinamide, omega-ceramides, or the combination.
• Head and neck cancer. Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with carbogen for improving survival in laryngeal cancer; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A phase III clinical trial in patients with laryngeal cancer shows that treatment with accelerated radiotherapy plus carbogen and niacinamide 60 mg/kg taken orally 1-1.5 hours prior to each fraction of radiation improves local tumor control, but does not improve overall survival or 5-year disease-free survival, when compared with accelerated radiotherapy alone. In a subgroup of patients with hypoxic tumors, anemia, or high expression of epidermal growth factor receptor, receiving niacinamide and carbogen seems to improve both survival and tumor control when compared with radiotherapy alone (93358,93359,93363).
• Melasma. It is unclear if topical niacinamide improves melasma. Details: A small clinical study in female adults with melasma shows that applying a specific niacinamide 10% serum (Bo leda, Shanghai Ruizhi Medical Technology Co., Ltd) twice daily after skin cleansing for 16 weeks improves melasma area and severity, pigmented spots, and skin texture when compared with control. Both groups were also treated with salicylic acid 30% throughout the study (113683). Topical niacinamide has also been studied in patients with hyperpigmentation. A small clinical study in Japanese females with uneven facial hyperpigmentation shows that applying niacinamide 5% moisturizer to the face twice daily reduces hyperpigmentation and increases skin lightness after 4 weeks when compared with placebo moisturizer. However, further improvements are not observed after another 4 weeks of treatment (25552). Another small clinical study in Korean females with uneven facial hyperpigmentation shows that applying a moisturizer containing niacinamide 2% plus tranexamic acid 2% (Regederm RX White Project, Aestura) twice daily for 8 weeks reduces skin pigmentation by about 9% when compared with a placebo cream (93361).
• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is unclear if adding oral niacinamide to chemotherapy reduces relapses of refractory lymphoma. Details: One small clinical study in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma shows that 24% of patients achieve complete or partial remission and 57% achieve disease stabilization when compared with baseline, following treatment with vorinostat 400 mg daily and niacinamide titrated from 20 mg/kg to 100 mg/kg over the first 14 days of a 21-day cycle for up to 18 cycles (93355). It is unclear how these outcomes compare to using vorinostat alone, or to other control treatments.
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral niacinamide is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with NAFLD and diabetes shows that taking a specific niacinamide product (Nature's Life) 1000 mg orally daily for 12 weeks does not improve liver function tests, liver steatosis, or liver fibrosis when compared with no intervention. However, some quality of life domain scores were moderately improved. However, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (110502).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral or topical niacinamide reduces the risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 clinical trials in adults shows that taking niacinamide 500 mg twice daily for 4-12 months does not reduce the risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer when compared with placebo. This analysis also shows no effect of niacinamide on the risk of basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (113560). However, there was high heterogeneity across the studies due to differences in patient populations and mixed results overall. Two studies included in the analysis show that niacinamide, including a specific niacinamide product (Nature's Own, Virginia), reduces the risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer in immunocompetent adults when compared with placebo (93362,93365). One was a large clinical trial that shows taking a specific niacinamide product (Insolar, Blackmores) 500 mg twice daily for 12 months reduces the rate of new nonmelanoma skin cancer by 23%, but it does not reduce the risk of not recurrent nonmelanoma skin cancers, when compared with placebo. However, this reduced risk appears to be transient. Follow up 6 months after niacinamide was discontinued showed no difference between groups (93362). The 2 other studies analyzed, including a large trial using a specific niacinamide product (Insolar, Blackmores), were conducted in transplant recipients showed no reduced risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer when compared with placebo (113560,113559). All studies were conducted in Australia; it is unclear if these results can be extrapolated to other geographical regions with different background ultraviolet radiation exposure and skin cancer rates. A previous meta-analysis of 5 clinical studies shows taking niacinamide 500-1000 mg daily for 6-12 months or applying niacinamide 1% twice daily for 6 months decreases the rate of basal cell and cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas by 54% and 52%, respectively when compared with control. Niacinamide was only administered topically in 1 of the 5 studies and only reduced risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (110497).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Although there is interest in using oral niacinamide for PMS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacinamide for this condition.
• Pruritus. It is unclear if oral niacinamide reduces pruritus in patients with kidney failure. Details: A small clinical study in patients with pruritus due to kidney failure shows that taking niacinamide sodium 500 mg twice daily for 4 weeks does not reduce pruritus severity when compared with placebo (93364). This study is limited due to small size and short study duration.
• Psoriasis. It is unclear if oral niacinamide is beneficial for psoriasis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with mild to moderate psoriasis shows that applying niacinamide 4% cream topically twice daily for 12 weeks improves psoriasis scores by 31% when compared with baseline. The validity of these results is limited by the lack of a comparator group (110501).
• Rosacea. Oral niacinamide has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that 71% of adult and adolescent patients with rosacea who take a combination product (Nicomide) containing niacinamide 750 mg, zinc 25 mg, copper 1.5 mg, and folic acid 500 mcg once or twice daily report improvement in appearance after 4 weeks when compared to baseline (25557). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Schizophrenia. Although there is interest in using oral niacinamide for schizophrenia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of niacinamide for this condition.
• Seborrheic dermatitis. It is unclear if topical niacinamide is beneficial for reducing seborrheic dermatitis symptoms. Details: One small clinical study in patients with seborrheic dermatitis shows that applying niacinamide 4% cream once daily for 12 weeks reduces the severity of symptoms such as redness and scaling by 75%, compared with a 35% reduction when using a placebo cream (93357). More evidence is needed to rate niacinamide for these uses.

(Read more about NIACINAMIDE)

EFFECTIVE

• Hypokalemia. Oral or intravenous potassium can treat and prevent hypokalemia. Details: Administering potassium orally or intravenously is effective for treating and preventing hypokalemia (15,107970). Oral potassium 20 mEq (780 mg of elemental potassium) is typically taken once daily to prevent hypokalemia (15,95010). Oral potassium 40-100 mEq (1560-3900 mg of elemental potassium) is typically taken in 2-5 divided doses daily to treat hypokalemia (95010). Doses should be limited to 40 mEq (1560 mg of elemental potassium), and the total dose should not exceed 200 mEq (7800 mg of elemental potassium) in 24 hours (95010). Potassium supplementation and route of administration should be individualized based on serum potassium level and patient status (15,107970).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Hypertension. Oral potassium, via dietary intake or supplementation, reduces blood pressure. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary potassium consumption is associated with a lower risk of developing hypertension (1310,8817,69512). Additionally, most clinical research shows that potassium, taken orally as part of the diet or as a supplement, reduces systolic blood pressure by about 3-9.5 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by about 2-6.4 mmHg in patients with or without hypertension (3385,92104,92106,95624,107974). In most of these studies, daily intake of potassium typically ranged from about 1500-7800 mg, with the most common intake being about 2340-2540 mg daily (92104,95624). However, some research shows that taking potassium does not lower systolic or diastolic blood pressure (69541,69550,107966). Differences in the patient populations, potassium intake, and salt intake could have contributed to the conflicting results. Potassium seems to be more effective for people with hypertension, low potassium levels, high daily sodium intake, and for Black adults (3384,3385,3386,92104,92106). Some research also shows that the greatest blood pressure-lowering effects of potassium occur at doses of about 3900-7800 mg daily (95624). A meta-analysis of clinical trials using a novel computational technique to assess both potassium intake and excretion suggests that the optimal blood pressure reduction occurs when taking about 1500 mg supplemental potassium daily or an overall intake of 4500-6500 mg potassium daily (105448). This analysis is limited by the heterogeneity and short duration of the included trials. There is also interest in utilizing low-sodium, high-potassium food substitutes to treat hypertension. Research shows that using salt substitutes containing 25% to 30% potassium chloride reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 3-4.6 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, when compared with regular table salt (107971,107976). In 2017, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) published guidelines recommending that patients with hypertension consume 3500-5000 mg of potassium daily (95680). This intake of potassium is expected to lower systolic blood pressure by about 4-5 mmHg in patients with hypertension and by about 2 mmHg in normotensive patients (3385). Although potassium supplements and dietary potassium both seem to be beneficial, the guidelines recommend getting potassium from dietary sources, since potassium-rich diets are usually heart-healthy (95680). Additionally, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Oral prescription potassium citrate reduces the risk of kidney stone recurrence. It is unclear if non-prescription potassium citrate would be beneficial. Details: The American Urological Association (AUA) recommends potassium citrate therapy for patients with recurrent calcium stones and low urinary citrate, those with recurrent calcium or calcium oxalate stones without current metabolic abnormalities, and those with uric acid or cystine stones. The citrate component reduces urine calcium excretion and increases urine citrate and urine pH, which in turn alleviates crystal growth, formation, and aggregation. Sodium citrate may also be used to prevent stone recurrence; however, due to sodium's propensity to increase urine calcium excretion, potassium citrate remains the preferred salt formulation (107972). It is important to note that potassium citrate supplements are not equivalent to prescription potassium citrate products. Dose and duration of treatment is determined by a healthcare professional and individualized based on a patient's urinary citrate levels (107975,107989). Serum potassium levels should be monitored prior to starting potassium citrate, within 2 weeks of treatment initiation, and every 12 months (107975).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Eating foods high in potassium and low in sodium might reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. It is unclear if taking potassium supplements has the same benefit. Details: Large population studies in adults without prior CVD have found that higher dietary potassium intake is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events (109395,109399). One study found that daily potassium intake of about 3300 mg is associated with a 13% reduction in CVD risk when compared with intake of about 1920 mg (109399). The other study found that each additional 1000 mg of daily urinary potassium excretion, which is a marker of dietary intake, is associated with an 18% reduction in CVD risk (109395). Another observational study in over 15,000 adults with history of stroke or hypertension shows that replacing regular table salt with a substitute product containing 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride for an average of 5 years decreases the rate of stroke, major cardiovascular events, or death (107976). High quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this association. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).
• Stroke. Eating foods high in potassium and low in sodium might reduce the risk of stroke. It is unclear if taking potassium supplements has the same benefit. Details: Higher dietary intake of potassium seems to be associated with a lower risk of stroke. Population research has found that increasing dietary potassium intake by 1-1.5 grams daily is associated with up to a 20% reduced risk of stroke (92105,92107). Some population research has found that higher supplemental intake of potassium is associated with a 29% reduced risk of ischemic stroke. However, supplemental potassium intake is not found to be associated with a lower risk of hemorrhagic or total stroke (92107). An observational study in over 15,000 adults with history of stroke or hypertension shows that replacing regular table salt with a substitute product containing 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride for an average of 5 years decreases the rate of stroke, major cardiovascular events, or death (107976). High quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this association. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Dental hypersensitivity. It is unclear if topical potassium improves dental hypersensitivity. Details: One meta-analysis of clinical research shows that using a dentifrice containing 5% potassium nitrite reduces dentin sensitivity when compared with a dentifrice that does not contain potassium nitrite (69549). Other clinical research published in a systematic review shows that potassium-containing toothpastes might reduce dentin sensitivity more than controls that do not contain potassium. However, these toothpastes might be less effective than other active toothpastes, such as those containing sodium monofluorophosphate, and the effect may result from a placebo effect, since the mechanism of action of potassium is unclear (69456).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if increasing dietary potassium reduces the risk of diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of 7 large population studies has found that consuming dietary potassium 3300-3500 mg daily is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of diabetes when compared with consumption below 1000 mg daily. Results were similar when studies that measured potassium intake with a dietary questionnaire were analyzed separately from those that measured intake based on urinary potassium excretion (110776). However, the validity of this finding is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies. Furthermore, despite use of data from various databases, most studies included in the analysis were conducted by the same author.
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral potassium improves glycemic control in prediabetes. Details: A small clinical study in Black patients with prediabetes shows that taking extended-release potassium (Klor-Con M10, Cardinal Health) 40 mEq daily as potassium chloride for 3 months does not improve glucose tolerance when compared with placebo. Although fasting glucose levels were slightly reduced in the potassium group when compared with placebo, both groups experienced a worsening of glucose intolerance, with no change in insulin levels or glycated hemoglobin (98533).
• Osteoporosis. Although there is interest in using oral potassium for osteoporosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of potassium for this condition.
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral potassium improves physical performance in older adults. Details: Observational research in older adults has found that decreased dietary potassium intake and increased dietary sodium intake over 5 years is associated with worsened physical performance (105450).
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral potassium is beneficial in patients with SLE. Details: Observational research in patients with SLE has found that increased dietary potassium intake is not associated with improvements in disease activity scores or markers of cardiovascular disease, including lipid levels and blood pressure, when compared with low dietary potassium intake. However, higher potassium intake does seem to reduce the odds of having elevated levels of C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation, in these patients (109397). More evidence is needed to rate potassium for these uses.

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Intranasal resveratrol seems to be beneficial for reducing allergic rhinitis symptoms in adults and children. Details: Some clinical research shows that intranasal resveratrol with carboxymethyl-beta-glucan can improve symptoms of allergic rhinitis (91332,97339). One clinical study in adults with allergic rhinitis shows that using an intranasal spray containing resveratrol 0.1% three times daily for 4 weeks reduces nasal symptoms and improves quality of life scores when compared with placebo (97339). A study in children aged 4-17 years with pollen-induced allergic rhinitis shows that using an intranasal spray containing resveratrol 0.05% three times daily for 2 months improves itching, sneezing, runny nose, and nasal obstruction and reduces use of rescue medication when compared with placebo (91332).
• Obesity. Oral resveratrol seems to be beneficial for weight loss in individuals with overweight or obesity. However, it is unlikely to be beneficial for improving most metabolic parameters in this population. Details: A meta-analysis of 28 clinical trials shows that taking resveratrol modestly decreases body weight by 0.5 kg, body mass index (BMI) by 0.17 kg/m2, and waist circumference by 0.8 cm when compared with placebo or no intervention. This analysis included studies of individuals with normal weight, overweight, and obesity, with or without type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, or other chronic conditions. A subgroup analysis suggests that individuals with obesity have a greater response to resveratrol. In these individuals, taking resveratrol 8-3000 mg daily resulted in an average weight reduction of 1.15 kg and a BMI reduction of 0.3 kg/m2 when compared with placebo. The greatest impact on body weight and BMI occurred with resveratrol doses of no more than 500 mg daily and treatment durations of at least 3 months (100696). However, it is unclear whether any improvements are clinically significant.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral resveratrol does not seem to be beneficial for CVD prevention. Details: Population research suggests that a higher dietary intake of resveratrol is not associated with a reduced risk of CVD when compared with a lower dietary intake (91334). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking resveratrol for up to 6 months does not improve any measures of plasma lipids, including total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or triglycerides in patients at high risk for CVD (91333). While one preliminary clinical study shows that taking resveratrol 10 mg daily for 3 months improves left ventricular function by about 1% and endothelial function when compared to baseline in patients with a history of myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease, the improvements are very small and blood pressure and markers of inflammation do not appear to be improved (91330).
• Hypercholesterolemia. Oral resveratrol does not seem to be beneficial for hypercholesterolemia. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that resveratrol is unlikely to be beneficial for improving blood lipids when compared with placebo in patients with hypercholesterolemia. In the meta-analysis, studied populations included people who are overweight or obese, as well as patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), angina, and dyslipidemia (105181). Although there was a small reduction in total cholesterol levels of approximately 7 mg/dL, resveratrol did not improve levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglycerides (105181). Also, an analysis of results from clinical research shows that taking resveratrol for up to 6 months does not improve any measures of plasma lipids, including total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, or triglycerides in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease (91333). Also, clinical research in healthy humans shows that taking resveratrol 500 mg orally daily for 30 days increases levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B (112944). Another meta-analysis identified more promising results; however, any effect on blood lipids may not be considered clinically significant. This meta-analysis included 17 clinical studies enrolling 968 participants with dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, overweight or obesity, or stroke. Resveratrol reduced total cholesterol by approximately 10 mg/dL, LDL by approximately 6 mg/dL, and triglycerides by approximately 9 mg/dL, but did not improve HDL, when compared with placebo. However, most of the included studies were small and utilized heterogenous dosing regimens, with doses ranging from 10-3000 mg daily for 4-48 weeks (110020).
• Metabolic syndrome. Oral resveratrol does not seem to be beneficial for metabolic syndrome. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking resveratrol does not improve blood pressure when compared with placebo in patients with metabolic syndrome or related disorders (102513). A similar meta-analysis shows that taking resveratrol does not improve levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, or liver enzymes. There was a small reduction in total cholesterol levels of approximately 7 mg/dL (105181). However, only 3-4 of the papers included in these meta-analyses, which included 28-31 publications, evaluated patients with metabolic syndrome. The remainder included patients with related conditions, such as overweight/obesity, type 2 diabetes, or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The mainly small or preliminary clinical studies that did evaluate patients with metabolic syndrome all show that taking resveratrol 100-1000 mg daily for 12-16 weeks does not improve blood pressure, glucose control, or plasma lipids (91331,95828,102513,105181). However, one preliminary clinical trial shows that taking resveratrol 500 mg three times daily for 3 months reduces body weight by about 4 kg, body mass index (BMI) by 1.3 kg/m2, fat mass by 2.4 kg, and waist circumference by 4 cm when compared to baseline (91331). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Also, a moderate-sized clinical trial of adults with metabolic syndrome shows that taking resveratrol 300 mg and delta-tocotrienols 500 mg daily for 24 weeks improves body weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, triglycerides, total and HDL cholesterol, and markers of inflammation and oxidative stress when compared with placebo (112144). It is unclear if these effects are due to resveratrol, delta-tocotrienols, or the combination.
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Oral resveratrol does not seem to be beneficial for most metabolic symptoms of NAFLD. It is unclear if oral resveratrol is beneficial for improving steatosis. Details: Although some individual studies disagree, meta-analyses reviewing 4-6 preliminary clinical studies show that taking resveratrol does not affect liver enzyme levels, insulin resistance, blood pressure, blood lipids, body mass index (BMI), or abdominal size when compared with placebo in patients with NAFLD (95826,99048,105184). Most trials have studied doses of 300-3000 mg daily for 2-3 months; one study used resveratrol 500 mg 3 times daily for 6 months (95826,98911,99048,105184). However, one meta-analysis shows that taking resveratrol might have a small effect on levels of the inflammatory mediators C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha (105184). It is not clear if resveratrol might reduce steatosis in patients with NAFLD. One preliminary clinical study shows that taking resveratrol 3000 mg daily in two divided doses for 8 weeks does not improve steatosis when compared to baseline in males with NAFLD (91327). However, another preliminary clinical study in adults with NAFLD shows that taking resveratrol 500 mg daily for 3 months, while following an energy-balanced diet and exercising, improves steatosis, but not fibrosis, insulin resistance, lipid levels, or body composition, when compared with lifestyle modifications alone (91328). The difference in these findings might be due to small study sizes, the duration of therapy, or the gender of the included patients.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. It is unclear if topical resveratrol is beneficial for acne. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a gel containing trans-resveratrol 1 mcg per gram to facial skin for 60 days reduces the severity of acne by about 54%, compared to only 6% for control gel (71064).
• Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral resveratrol is beneficial for age-related cognitive decline. Details: One small clinical study shows that taking resveratrol 75 mg twice daily for 14 weeks modestly improves cognitive performance and memory after menopause, but not executive function or learning, when compared with placebo (95827). Another small clinical study in healthy, older adults shows that taking resveratrol 200 mg daily for 26 weeks improves memory retention, but not delayed recall or word recognition, when compared with placebo. In this study, resveratrol capsules were formulated to also contain 320 mg of quercetin to enhance the absorption of resveratrol (102511). It is unclear if resveratrol alone would result in similar effects. Despite these positive results, conflicting research exists. A small clinical study in sedentary, overweight, elderly adults shows that taking resveratrol 300 mg daily for 90 days does not improve measures of cognitive function such as psychomotor speed, attention, executive function, learning, or memory when compared with placebo. Taking a higher dose of 1000 mg daily for 90 days modestly improves psychomotor speed, but no other cognitive measures, in these patients (98907). Another small clinical study in healthy elderly adults shows that taking resveratrol 200 mg daily for 26 weeks does not improve verbal memory when compared with placebo (98909).
• Aging skin. Although there has been interest in using oral resveratrol for aging skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of resveratrol for this purpose.
• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral resveratrol is beneficial for improving symptoms of Alzheimer disease. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in patients with Alzheimer disease shows that taking resveratrol or trans-resveratrol up to 500 mg daily for 12 to 52 weeks improves the ability to perform activities of daily living but does not change cognitive function when compared with placebo (114517).
• Beta-thalassemia. It is unclear if oral resveratrol is beneficial for beta-thalassemia. Details: A small clinical study in patients with beta-thalassemia intermedia shows that taking micronized trans-resveratrol (Xian Tianxingjian Natural Bio-Products CO., LTD) 2000 mg with piperine (Bioprex Co.) 40 mg, with or without hydroxyurea 8-15 mg/kg, daily for 6 months does not improve hemoglobin levels or affect the need for blood transfusion when compared with taking placebo with or without hydroxyurea (98908).
• Cancer. It is unclear if dietary resveratrol is beneficial for cancer prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher dietary intake of resveratrol is not associated with a reduced risk of cancer when compared to lower dietary intake (91334).
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Oral resveratrol has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a combination of resveratrol 10 mg, vitamin C 180 mg, zinc 15 mg, and flavonoids 160 mg daily for 20 days followed by 10 days without supplementation, repeated for three cycles, modestly reduces symptoms of cough and sputum production in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD when compared with control (71130). It is not clear if these effects are due to resveratrol, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Cognitive function. Oral resveratrol has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in healthy young adults shows that taking a specific supplement (Transmax by BiotiviaTM) containing trans-resveratrol 500 mg and piperine 10 mg daily for 28 days does not improve most measures of cognitive performance when compared with placebo (95834).
• Cognitive impairment. Oral resveratrol has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in a small number of patients with mild cognitive impairment shows that taking resveratrol 200 mg and quercetin 350 mg daily for 26 weeks does not improve learning and memory performance when compared with placebo (102512). However, given the small sample size, it is possible this study was inadequately powered to detect significant changes in these cognitive measures.
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral resveratrol is beneficial for COVID-19. Details: A small clinical trial in outpatients with COVID-19 shows that taking resveratrol (Vita-Age) 1 gram four times daily, for 7-15 days based on symptom duration, does not reduce the rate of hospitalization, emergency room visits, or pneumonia when compared with placebo. All patients also received a single dose of Vitamin D3 (109164). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect differences between groups.
• Diabetes. Some research shows that oral resveratrol is beneficial for improving glycemic indices in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, more research is needed to determine the most effective dose or the patient population most likely to benefit. Details: Although results from individual clinical studies have been mixed (91329,95825,95832,100695,109165,109167,109170), meta-analyses of clinical research show that resveratrol modestly reduces blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in patients with diabetes. Studies lasted 4-24 weeks and many included patients treated with antidiabetes medications, including metformin. However, these meta-analyses have yielded differing findings regarding effective doses (91329,109165,109167,109170). One meta-analysis of clinical research in individuals aged 45 years and older shows that doses of 250-1000 mg daily modestly reduce levels of fasting blood glucose, insulin, and HbA1c, as well as insulin resistance, when compared with placebo. Doses of up to 250 mg daily are generally ineffective, and only one study used doses greater than 1000 mg daily. Although sub-analyses suggest that these benefits may be limited to individuals aged 45-59 years, the number of studies in older individuals is small and findings are unclear (109165). A second meta-analysis in adults with type 2 diabetes suggests that resveratrol doses of at least 500 mg daily were necessary for reducing levels of fasting blood glucose and insulin, as well as insulin resistance (109167). A third meta-analysis, which also included Chinese language publications, shows that doses of resveratrol of at least 1000 mg daily are needed for improved glycemic control (109170). Some studies have used a specific resveratrol product (Biotivia Bioceuticals, International SrL) (95825). Although the reasons for discrepancies between individual clinical trials are not clear, it is possible that conflicting results are related to baseline blood glucose control. Resveratrol has shown benefit in patients with diabetes that is not well-controlled at baseline (HbA1c of 8% or higher) (91329), while results are mixed in patients with diabetes that is at least moderately well-controlled prior to supplementation (HbA1c of 7% or lower) (95825,100695). It is also possible that the differences may relate to the technique used to measure outcomes. For instance, resveratrol appears to improve insulin resistance when measured by the Stumvoll insulin sensitivity index, but not by the gold-standard hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique (95832). Resveratrol has also been evaluated for improving blood pressure, blood lipid, and liver transaminase levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. Meta-analyses of clinical trials show that resveratrol has a small, but likely clinically insignificant, effect on systolic blood pressure when compared with placebo. Two meta-analyses show similar findings for diastolic blood pressure; however, some research suggests that any benefits are limited to doses of at least 500 mg daily (102513,109167,109170). Most meta-analyses of clinical research show that resveratrol does not improve blood lipid levels (105181,109167,109170) or liver transaminase levels (105181) when compared with placebo. Other clinical research in patients with overweight and type 2 diabetes shows that taking resveratrol 1000 mg daily for 8 weeks does not affect hepatic steatosis or cardiovascular risk indices when compared with placebo (109169).
• Diabetic nephropathy. It is unclear if oral resveratrol is beneficial for diabetic nephropathy. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with diabetic nephropathy shows that taking resveratrol 500 mg plus losartan 12.5 mg daily for 90 days can reduce urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratios, but not serum creatinine levels or glomerular filtration rates, when compared with taking placebo and losartan. When compared to baseline, the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio decreased by 46 mg/gram with resveratrol and increased by 25 mg/gram with placebo (100695).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral resveratrol is beneficial for lowering blood pressure. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that resveratrol is unlikely to be beneficial for improving systolic or diastolic blood pressure when compared with placebo in patients with hypertension. In the meta-analysis, studied populations included people who are overweight or obese, as well as patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), stroke, and dyslipidemia (102513). More research is needed in patients with hypertension.
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if oral resveratrol is beneficial for treating migraine headache. Details: A small clinical crossover study in patients with hormonal migraine headaches shows that taking resveratrol (Veri-te Resveratrol, Evolva SA) 75 mg twice daily for 3 months does not affect headache frequency, severity, or disability when compared with placebo (109166). However, this study did not include a wash-out period between treatments, introducing the potential for carry-over effects.
• Mitochondrial myopathies. It is unclear if oral resveratrol is beneficial for increasing exercise tolerance in patients with mitochondrial myopathies. Details: A very small clinical trial in adults with mitochondrial myopathies shows that taking resveratrol (Veri-te resveratrol) 500 mg twice daily for 8 weeks does not improve exercise capacity when compared with placebo (109162). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect differences between groups.
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral resveratrol is beneficial for osteoarthritis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with mild or moderate knee osteoarthritis receiving physical therapy and meloxicam 15 mg daily shows that adding resveratrol 500 mg daily for 90 days improves pain, function, and stiffness when compared with adding placebo (98910).
• Osteopenia. It is unclear if oral resveratrol is beneficial for improving bone mineral density (BMD). Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking resveratrol at doses of up to 1500 mg daily for 1-12 months does not increase BMD or alter bone biomarkers when compared with placebo (109163). The studies in this meta-analysis included various populations, such as postmenopausal or overweight individuals, or patients with type 2 diabetes or metabolic syndrome. However, a clinical study in healthy, postmenopausal females shows that taking fermented soy 200 mg, containing resveratrol 25 mg and equol 10mg, orally daily for 12 months increases whole-body BMD when compared with placebo. Levels of markers of bone formation, including osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, are increased, and the level of deoxypyridinoline, a marker of bone resorption, is decreased (112942).
• Periodontitis. It is unclear if oral resveratrol is beneficial for periodontitis. Details: A small clinical study in individuals with chronic moderate-to-severe periodontitis who recently received non-surgical treatment for periodontitis shows that taking resveratrol 480 mg daily for 4 weeks improves plaque index when compared with placebo, but resveratrol does not seem to improve other markers of periodontitis, including pocket depth, bleeding index, clinical attachment loss, or salivary markers of inflammation (112135). The study may have been inadequately powered and too short in duration to detect a difference between the groups.
• Peritoneal dialysis. It is unclear if oral resveratrol can improve outcomes with peritoneal dialysis. Details: One clinical study shows that taking trans-resveratrol 150 mg or 450 mg daily for 12 weeks increases ultrafiltration rate and volume when compared with placebo in patients on peritoneal dialysis. The effect appears to be dose-dependent (95830).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral resveratrol is beneficial for PCOS. Details: Clinical research in patients with PCOS shows that taking resveratrol 1000 mg daily for 3 months results in a regular menstruation cycle length in 77% of individuals, compared with 52% of those taking placebo. The occurrence of hair loss was reduced by about 50%; however, there was no effect on hormone, metabolic, or lipid profiles. There was also a small increase in fat mass and decrease in fat-free mass, although the clinical relevance of these changes is unclear (109131). A small clinical trial in adults with PCOS shows that taking micronized trans-resveratrol (RevGenetics) 1500 mg daily for 3 months decreases levels of testosterone, but does not improve weight, lipid levels, insulin sensitivity, acne, or hirsutism, when compared with placebo (95823). A meta-analysis of 4 controlled trials of resveratrol, taken orally in doses of 800-1500 mg daily for 40 days to 3 months, shows reductions in levels of testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate when compared with placebo, but no effect on follicle stimulating hormone, prolactin, thyroid stimulating hormone, C-reactive protein, insulin, sex hormone binding globulin, lipids, acne, or pregnancy rates (112943).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear if oral resveratrol is beneficial for RA. Details: A small clinical study shows that adding resveratrol 1 gram orally once daily as adjunct therapy to antirheumatic drugs for 2 months reduces the number of tender and swollen joints, as well as biomarkers of inflammation. It is not known whether resveratrol reduces joint damage when assessed using conventional radiography. Also, the most effective combination of resveratrol and antirheumatic drug is not known, since the patients in this study were taking different antirheumatic drugs at variable doses (95706).
• Sciatica. Oral resveratrol has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with sciatica secondary to a herniated disk shows that taking a combination of resveratrol 50 mg with alpha-lipoic acid, acetyl-L-carnitine, and cholecalciferol orally once daily for 30 days, concurrently with a physiotherapy protocol, reduces pain and disability, and improves quality of life when compared with the physiotherapy protocol alone (112933). It is unclear if the effects are due to resveratrol, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Ulcerative colitis. It is unclear if oral resveratrol is beneficial for ulcerative colitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking trans-resveratrol (Sumabe Company) 500 mg daily for 6 weeks reduces subjective measures of disease activity and improves quality of life measures when compared with placebo in patients with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis (95831). However, a small clinical trial in patients with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis shows that taking resveratrol (VeNatura Resveratrol Supplement) 250 mg twice daily for 8 weeks, while following the Mediterranean diet, is not more effective for improving ulcerative colitis symptom severity than following the Mediterranean diet without supplemental resveratrol (113339). More evidence is needed to rate resveratrol for these uses.

(Read more about RESVERATROL)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Congestive heart failure (CHF). Oral taurine may improve left ventricular function, heart failure-related symptoms, and exercise capacity in patients with CHF. Details: Taking taurine 2-6 grams in two or three divided doses daily for 6-8 weeks seems to improve left ventricular function (5248,5271,8221) and symptoms of heart failure (5271,5306,8221) when compared with placebo or coenzyme Q10 in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II to IV. Also, taking taurine 500 mg three times daily for 2 weeks seems to improve exercise capacity when compared with placebo in patients with heart failure (77176). Some patients with severe heart failure rapidly improve from NYHA class IV to II after 4-8 weeks of treatment. Improvement seems to continue for as long as taurine treatment is continued, up to one year (5306,8217,8218,8221).
• Hepatitis. Oral taurine may improve liver function in patients with acute or chronic hepatitis. Details: Several small clinical trials show that taking taurine 1.5-4 grams daily for up to 3 months improves liver function in patients with acute and chronic hepatitis when compared with placebo (10454,77114,77147).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Obesity. Oral taurine does not appear to improve body weight in adults who are obese or overweight. Details: A meta-analysis of 12 small clinical trials shows that taurine supplementation does not reduce body weight or body mass index (BMI) when compared with placebo. The studies included in this analysis evaluated taurine doses of 0.5-6 grams daily for 15 days to 6 months. Most of the patient populations evaluated in the included studies had liver or metabolic disorders; three studies specifically evaluated overweight or obese adults (104166). Additionally, a more recent clinical trial in a small group of females with obesity shows that taking taurine 1 gram three times daily along with a calorie-restricted diet for 8 weeks does not reduce body weight, BMI, or waist circumference when compared with calorie restriction alone (104167). In contrast, a very small study in adults with type 2 diabetes on antidiabetes medication shows that taking taurine 500 mg twice daily for 8 weeks reduces body mass, BMI, and body fat percentage when compared with control (112271). The validity of these effects is limited by the small sample size.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Academic performance. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial to improve academic performance. Details: A very small clinical study in college entrance examinees over age 19 shows that taking a jelly containing taurine 3 grams daily for 14 days does not improve academic achievement when compared with baseline or placebo (110579). Due to its small size, this study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Although there has been interest in using oral taurine for AMD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of taurine for this purpose.
• Androgenic alopecia. Oral taurine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with androgenic alopecia or telogen effluvium shows that taking a combination product containing taurine, cysteine, methionine, iron, selenium, and hydrolyzed collagen (GFM Oral, Cantabria Labs) along with conventional therapy, consisting primarily of finasteride or minoxidil, daily for 12 weeks improves hair loss when compared with conventional therapy alone (111636). It is unclear if this effect is due to taurine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Athletic performance. Research on the use of taurine for improving endurance or power output is limited and conflicting; however, it may improve performance by a small amount in some athletes. Details: Research is conflicting on the effects of taurine on athletic performance. Several clinical studies in trained and untrained athletes show that taking taurine 1-6 grams as a single dose before endurance exercise, or 3 grams daily for 8 weeks after endurance exercise, does not improve endurance or aerobic capacity when compared with placebo (77159,77203,95613,98334). However, a meta-analysis of 7 small clinical trials shows that taking taurine 1-6 grams daily for up to 2 weeks slightly improves endurance when compared with control. Also, preliminary studies in male cyclists, recreationally active males, Olympic-level athletes, and female athletes habituated to caffeine show that taking taurine 50 mg/kg or 1-6 grams one time 1.5-2 hours prior to a cycling test increases the time to exhaustion and peak, mean, and minimum power output but does not improve perceived exertion, fatigue index, heart rate, or anaerobic capacity when compared with placebo (101475,103211,112265,112269). The reasons for these discrepancies are unclear; the meta-analysis did not identify a dose or duration-related benefit. One small clinical trial shows that taking taurine 40 mg/kg improves muscle power in caffeine-deprived athletes who regularly use caffeine, but actually seems to worsen muscle power in athletes who do not regularly use caffeine (98335). Overall, it is not clear which population is most likely to benefit from taurine use (98337,98338). Study results are mixed when taurine has been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. One small study shows that taking a specific product containing taurine and caffeine (AdvoCare Spark) does not improve sprint performance in college athletes when compared with placebo (77195). However, other small studies of cyclists and boxers suggest that taking taurine in combination with a variety of other ingredients including B vitamins, caffeine, and glucuronolactone (Red Bull Energy Drink) or ginseng, kudzu, and soybean, may improve measures such as endurance, power, balance, or agility (37815,57945,110577,112269). It is unclear if the benefits seen in these studies are due to taurine, other ingredients, or the combinations.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although there has been interest in using oral taurine for ADHD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of taurine for this purpose.
• Autism spectrum disorder. Although there has been interest in using oral taurine for autism spectrum disorder, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of taurine for this purpose.
• Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with CINV. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving 6 months of chemotherapy shows that taking taurine (pure powder, Aviforme) 1000 mg twice daily, starting 6 hours after receiving chemotherapeutic agents, significantly improves CINV in 87.5% of patients. Other symptoms, such as reduced appetite and smell and taste impairment, are also improved in some patients (91512).
• Chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial for preventing or treating chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving 6 months of chemotherapy shows that taking taurine (pure powder, Aviforme) 1000 mg twice daily reduces plasma creatinine, urea, bilirubin, and liver enzymes after 4 months when compared with placebo. This suggests a protective effect against chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity. A reduction in overall fatigue is also observed (95616).
• Cirrhosis. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with cirrhosis. Details: One small, uncontrolled clinical study in patients with cirrhosis shows that taking taurine 1 gram three times daily for 4 weeks reduces the severity and frequency of muscle cramps when compared to baseline (104165). Another small clinical trial in patients with cirrhosis shows that taking taurine 6 grams daily for 4 weeks reduces portal hypertension by 12%, compared with a 2% increase in the placebo group (98336). However, it is unclear if this is associated with a reduced risk for complications such as variceal bleeding and ascites.
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial for improving cognitive function; however, taking an energy drink (Red Bull Energy Drink) containing taurine and other ingredients may modestly improve some measures of cognitive function. Details: Levels of taurine decrease with age, but supplementation does not seem to have neuroprotective effects or cognitive benefits in the elderly (101471,110574,110578). In one small crossover study, taurine alone did not reduce errors in sleep-deprived individuals when compared with placebo (38154). However, taurine taken as part of an energy drink formulation containing taurine, caffeine, glucuronolactone, and B vitamins (Red Bull Energy Drink) improves focused and sustained attention, wakefulness, verbal reasoning, driving ability and quality, and reaction speed when compared with placebo (9899,38117,77088,77202). Preliminary clinical research in young adults also shows that consuming the Red Bull Energy Drink might improve attention and verbal reasoning, but does not seem to improve memory, when compared with placebo (9899,77088).
• Cystic fibrosis. Oral taurine may reduce steatorrhea in children with cystic fibrosis, but it does not seem to improve other measures of nutritional status. Details: Some small clinical studies in children with cystic fibrosis show that taking taurine 30-40 mg/kg daily for 7 days to 6 months might be useful as adjunctive therapy to reduce steatorrhea when compared with baseline or placebo (10455,77227,77231). However, it does not seem to improve growth, lung function, muscle protein breakdown, or other symptoms of cystic fibrosis (77224,77228). Also, adding taurine 500-1500 mg daily to treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid for up to one year does not improve liver function tests, fat absorption, or nutritional status in patients with cystic fibrosis and associated liver disease when compared with ursodeoxycholic acid alone (77246,77256).
• Delirium. It is unclear if oral taurine prevents delirium in patients in the intensive care unit. Details: A large clinical study of hospitalized adults in Iran who underwent liver transplantation shows that taking a specific taurine powder product (100% Taurine Amino Acid, MyProtein) 2 grams daily for 30 days post-transplant reduces the risk of delirium by 73% when compared with placebo. These results also suggest that for every four patients treated with taurine over placebo, one additional case of delirium is prevented. Patients who took taurine also had less time on the ventilator and shorter intensive care and hospital stays (110575). However, it is unclear if these effects are due to taurine or other factors since ventilator time and intensive care length of stay are risk factors for delirium.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with diabetes. Details: Plasma levels of taurine are reported to be lower in patients with diabetes than in healthy controls (101473). However, clinical research evaluating taurine for glycemic control is mixed (77074,103212). One small clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking taurine 1 gram three times daily for 8 weeks reduces blood glucose, insulin resistance, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when compared with placebo (103212). Although there was no improvement in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), the study was not long enough to detect a meaningful reduction in HbA1c. Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking taurine 1-1.5 grams twice daily for 2-4 months does not affect fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, or insulin but may improve measures of insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes when compared with placebo (77074,112271). However, taking taurine while following an exercise program 3 times weekly does appear to reduce fasting blood sugar and HbA1c when compared with exercise plus placebo (112271). The reasons for these discrepant findings are unclear; however, all the included studies were small and potentially inadequately powered to detect a difference in outcomes.
• Epilepsy. Although there has been interest in using oral taurine for epilepsy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of taurine for this condition.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Small clinical studies suggest that oral taurine may modestly improve exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: One small clinical trial in healthy, untrained adults shows that taking taurine 2 grams in combination with branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) three times daily for 2 weeks reduces subjective muscle soreness by 37% when compared with placebo (77212). Another small clinical trial in young, untrained males shows that taking taurine (Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., LTD.) 2 grams three times daily after meals before exercise, and continuing for three days after exercise, reduces delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), but not creatine kinase levels, when compared with placebo (91513).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial for improving fatigue. Details: One small clinical trial shows that taurine seems to reduce fatigue when taken alone, but increases fatigue when taken in combination with caffeine (77202). However, an observational study in young adults has found that subjective scores for physical and mental fatigue do not seem to correlate with dietary taurine intake (101472). One small clinical trial shows that drinking 500 mL of an energy drink providing taurine 1 gram plus other ingredients including caffeine and B vitamins decreases measures of driving-related fatigue in a driving simulation when compared with placebo (91075).
• Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if oral taurine can aid in the eradication of helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Details: One clinical trial shows that taking taurine 500 mg twice daily in combination with conventional treatment for 6 weeks increases H. pylori eradication and shortens duodenal ulcer scarring time in patients with confirmed H. pylori infection when compared with conventional treatment alone (77145).
• Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial for lowering lipid levels. Details: A meta-analysis of 12 small clinical trials in adults with various liver or metabolic disorders, but without a specific diagnosis of hyperlipidemia, shows that taurine supplementation reduces total cholesterol by 11 mg/dL and triglycerides by 13 mg/dL, but does not seem to improve low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. The studies included in this analysis evaluated doses of 0.5-6 grams daily for 15 days to 6 months (104166). The benefits of taurine in adults with hyperlipidemia are unclear. The effect of taurine has also been investigated in combination with exercise. A very small study in adults with type 2 diabetes on antidiabetes medication shows that taking taurine 500 mg twice daily while participating in an exercise program 3 times weekly for 8 weeks reduces triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol and increases HDL cholesterol when compared with exercise plus placebo (112271).
• Hypertension. Oral taurine may modestly reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension; however, the long-term antihypertensive effects of taurine are unclear. Details: One clinical study in patients with elevated blood pressure or stage 1 hypertension shows that taking taurine 1.6 grams daily for 12 weeks reduces systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 5 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 3 mmHg when compared with placebo. The benefit is seen after 8 weeks of continued supplementation (95614). A small clinical trial in patients with stage 2 hypertension (previously classified as borderline hypertension) shows that taking taurine 6 grams daily for 7 days reduces both SBP and DBP when compared to baseline (77229). The long-term effects of taurine on blood pressure are unclear. A meta-analysis of 12 small clinical trials in adults with various liver or metabolic disorders, but without a specific hypertension diagnosis, shows that taurine supplementation reduces SBP by 5 mmHg and DBP by 3 mmHg when compared with placebo. The studies included in this analysis evaluated doses of 0.5-6 grams daily for 15 days to 6 months (104166). Taurine is commonly found in energy drinks, and its effect on blood pressure when used in combination with other ingredients in the form of an energy drink has been evaluated. A small observational study in young adults suggests that drinking a specific combination product containing taurine 100 mg, caffeine, and group B vitamins (Redbull Energy Drink) reduces heart rate but does not change SBP or DBP when compared to baseline (112266). However, another small observational study in young healthy adults suggests that drinking a specific combination product containing taurine 2000 mg, caffeine, ginseng, glucuronolactone, inositol, guarana, L-carnitine, and B vitamins (Monster Energy Drink) increases both SBP and DBP by about 16 mmHg and raises heart rate by 17 beats per minute 15 minutes after consumption when compared to baseline. However, 90 minutes after consumption only DBP and heart rate remain elevated (112268). In both studies, the validity of the effects is limited by a lack of a comparator group. Additionally, it is unclear if the effects are due to taurine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Infant development. Higher maternal intake of taurine from the diet may be linked to increased newborn length and weight; however, feeding taurine-containing formula to newborns does not appear to improve infant development. Details: One observational study has found a positive correlation between maternal dietary taurine intake and newborn length. In pregnant patients with high taurine intake (>120 mg/day), neonatal birth weight and length were significantly higher when compared with groups with lower taurine intake (101474). However, clinical research shows that administering infant formula containing taurine 45 mg/L for up to 12 weeks does not affect weight, length, head circumference, or behavior in preterm and full-term infants when compared with formula without taurine (77119,77216,77218,77239,77260).
• Iron deficiency anemia. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with iron deficiency anemia. Details: One small clinical trial in females with iron deficiency anemia shows that taking taurine 1000 mg plus ferrous sulfate 325 mg daily for 20 weeks improves hemoglobin concentrations, red blood cell counts, and serum ferritin levels when compared with ferrous sulfate plus placebo (77070).
• Muscular dystrophy. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with muscular dystrophy. Details: One very small crossover trial in patients with muscular dystrophy shows that taking taurine 100-150 mg/kg for 6 months improves the ability to relax muscles after voluntary use when compared with placebo (77235).
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral taurine improves physical performance in older adults. Details: A small study in elderly females living in a care facility shows that taking taurine powder 1.5 grams daily for 14 weeks in addition to standardized exercise training may modestly improve some measures of physical fitness (i.e. agility, endurance) when compared to baseline. These measures were not improved in patients who took taurine but did not participate in exercise training or who participated in exercise training but did not take taurine (110574). The validity of these findings is limited by lack of randomization, blinding, and statistical comparison between groups.
• Postoperative recovery. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial for improving postoperative recovery. Details: One small clinical trial in patients recovering from surgery after a hip fracture shows that taking taurine 6 grams daily for 7 days after surgery does not improve morbidity and mortality outcomes after 1 year when compared with placebo (95615).
• Psychosis. It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with psychosis. Details: One small clinical trial in adults up to 25 years of age with first-episode psychosis shows that taking taurine 4 grams daily for 12 weeks in combination with prescribed antipsychotics reduces positive psychotic symptoms, but not negative or cognitive symptoms, when compared with placebo (95612).
• Sleep deprivation. Oral taurine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a combination product containing taurine, caffeine, glucuronolactone, and B vitamins (Red Bull Energy Drink) reduces lane drifting and sleepiness and improves driving quality and reaction time during a car-driving simulator exercise in sleep-deprived individuals when compared with placebo (38117,77066). Other preliminary clinical research in sleep-deprived surgical trainees shows that taking taurine 2 grams in addition to caffeine 150 mg improves reaction time during performance of simulated laparoscopic surgery when compared with placebo, although error-making is not reduced (38154).
• Tourette syndrome. Oral taurine may improve tic severity in children with Tourette syndrome who are taking tiapride at a dose of 300 mg or less. Taurine may not be effective in children taking higher doses of tiapride. Details: One clinical trial in children 6-16 years of age with Tourette syndrome or other tic disorders shows that taking taurine along with tiapride reduces the severity of tics when compared with tiapride alone. For every 6 children taking taurine, one additional child saw a 60% or greater reduction in tic severity as measured on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale when compared with placebo. However, taurine did not improve tic severity in children taking tiapride at a dose greater than 300 mg daily (103210). Taurine was taken in age-dependent doses of 2.4 grams daily in those 6-8 years, 3.6 grams daily in those 9-13 years, and 4.8 grams daily in those 14-16 years.
• Traumatic brain injury (TBI). It is unclear if oral taurine is beneficial in patients with a TBI. Details: A small clinical study of adults in Iran receiving treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) following TBI shows that adding a specific taurine powder product (Nutricost) 30 mg/kg/day up to 3 grams daily to enteral nutrition for 14 days may modestly improve disease severity scores, but does not reduce days on the ventilator, ICU length of stay, or mortality at 30 days when compared with usual enteral nutrition (110573). Due to its small size, this study may have been underpowered to detect differences between groups. More evidence is needed to rate taurine for these uses.

(Read more about TAURINE)

EFFECTIVE

• Phenylketonuria (PKU). Oral tyrosine as a component of medical foods is recommended in people with PKU, a disorder in which phenylalanine cannot be endogenously metabolized into tyrosine. Details: Tyrosine is used as a component of medical foods for people with phenylketonuria (PKU) (7212,7213,7232). Current guidelines recommend that people with PKU maintain a diet low in phenylalanine and incorporate tyrosine as a component of medical foods to maintain normal blood levels of tyrosine (95108). Supplementation with additional tyrosine is recommended only for patients with consistently low blood levels of tyrosine despite using tyrosine-containing medical foods (95108). Routine supplementation with free tyrosine is not recommended for most patients because it can produce wide variations in tyrosine plasma concentrations and side effects (7212,95108). Tyrosine intake does not improve neuropsychological measures in patients with PKU (81503,91471,95108).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cognitive function. Oral tyrosine might improve cognitive function, particularly in patients exposed to stressors such as excessive cold, noise, or sleep deprivation. Details: Most research suggests that taking tyrosine orally improves cognitive function, particularly under stressful conditions. Small clinical studies in healthy adults show that taking tyrosine 100-300 mg/kg in the setting of exposure to stressors such as excessive cold, noise, or sleep deprivation improves cognitive performance measures, such as executive function and short-term memory, when compared with placebo (7215,81472,81476,81484,81501). Other small clinical studies in healthy patients show that taking tyrosine 2 grams may improve response time without detracting from performance and could improve some measures of cognitive response to conflict when compared with placebo (101082,111248). Some of these small studies may be inadequately powered to detect an effect on some cognitive function tests. Tyrosine has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients for this purpose. A small clinical study in healthy adults with fatigue shows that taking tyrosine, serine, alanine, glutamate, and aspartate daily for 4 weeks improves measures of cognitive function including attention, spatial cognition, orientation, motivation, and time management when compared with placebo (111249). It is unclear if these effects are due to tyrosine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Memory. Taking tyrosine orally seems to improve memory in patients exposed to stressors such as cold or those having to complete multiple tasks at once. Details: Small clinical studies in healthy adults show that taking tyrosine 150-300 mg/kg prior to acute exposure to stress that is cold-induced, noise-induced, or induced by multi-tasking improves memory performance when compared with placebo (81469,81477,81499,81501). However, tyrosine 150 mg/kg does not seem to improve memory in less stressful situations such as performing one simple task or testing when not exposed to cold (81469,81499).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral tyrosine does not improve athletic performance when taken prior to exercise. Details: Clinical studies show that taking tyrosine orally prior to participating in treadmill or cycling exercises conducted at temperate temperatures or in the heat does not improve strength, endurance, or performance when compared with placebo (81471,81474,81504,91470,104403). Another very small clinical study in healthy males shows that taking a multi-ingredient pre-workout supplement containing L-tyrosine, beta-alanine, L-citrulline maleate, arginine alpha-ketoglutarate, L-taurine, and caffeine does not increase bench press strength endurance when compared with equivalent amounts of anhydrous caffeine (111250).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. Oral tyrosine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with alcohol use disorder shows that taking a combination of tyrosine 900 mg, D,L-phenylalanine 1.5 grams, L-glutamine 300 mg, and L-tryptophan 400 mg daily along with a multivitamin supplement reduces withdrawal symptoms and decreases stress when compared with placebo (81552). It is unclear if these effects are due to tyrosine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral tyrosine is beneficial for improving ADHD symptoms. Details: A very small clinical study shows that taking tyrosine does not improve symptoms of ADHD in children when compared with baseline (7209). Furthermore, another very small clinical trial in adults with ADHD shows that taking tyrosine daily for 8 weeks does not improve inattention when compared with baseline. Some patients might have transient symptom improvement after 2 weeks, but seem to acquire tolerance by 6 weeks (7210). The validity of these findings is limited by the small study size and lack of control groups.
• Cocaine dependence. Oral tyrosine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with cocaine dependence shows that taking L-tyrosine 1 gram in the morning and L-tryptophan 1 gram in the evening for 14 days does not reduce drug cravings or withdrawal symptoms when compared with placebo (81480).
• Dementia. Oral tyrosine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with severe Alzheimer disease or multi-infarct dementia shows that taking a combination of tyrosine 4 grams, 5-HTP 800 mg, and carbidopa 100 mg orally daily does not improve clinical or psychological parameters in most patients when compared with baseline (918). The validity of this finding is limited by the small study size and a lack of control group.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral tyrosine is beneficial for improving major depressive disorder. Details: A small clinical study in patients with major depression shows that taking L-tyrosine 100 mg/kg daily for 4 weeks does not improve depressive symptoms when compared with placebo (7208).
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). Although there is interest in using oral tyrosine for ED, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of tyrosine for this condition.
• Fatigue. Oral tyrosine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults with fatigue shows that taking tyrosine, serine, alanine, glutamate, and aspartate daily for 4 weeks does not improve subjective or objective measures of fatigue when compared with placebo (111249).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral tyrosine is beneficial for reducing hypertension of mild severity. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with mild essential hypertension shows that taking oral tyrosine 2.5 grams three times daily with meals for 2 weeks does not affect systolic or diastolic blood pressure when compared with control (81487).
• Mitochondrial myopathies. Although there is interest in using oral tyrosine for nemaline myopathy, a type of mitochondrial myopathy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of tyrosine for this condition.
• Narcolepsy. It is unclear if oral tyrosine is beneficial for improving narcolepsy symptoms. Details: A small clinical study in patients with narcolepsy shows that taking capsules containing tyrosine 3 grams orally three times daily for 4 weeks might reduce feelings of tiredness or drowsiness when compared with placebo, but the overall effect is not clinically significant. Tyrosine also does not seem to improve sudden muscle weakness, sleep paralysis, night-time sleep, sleep latency, or speed and attention after waking when compared with placebo (81482).
• Obesity. Oral tyrosine has only been evaluated for in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in overweight or obese patients shows that taking a supplement containing tyrosine 1.2 grams, cayenne 450 mg, green tea 1.5 grams, caffeine 150 mg, and calcium carbonate 3.89 grams daily for 8 weeks slightly reduces body fat mass by 0.9 kg when compared with placebo (81475). It is not clear if any potential benefit is due to tyrosine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Opioid withdrawal. Oral tyrosine has only been evaluated for heroin withdrawal in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in Chinese males undergoing detoxification for heroin addiction shows that taking a combination of tyrosine 50 mg/kg, 5-HTP 200 mg, phosphatidylcholine 1200 mg, and L-glutamine 50 mg/kg daily for 6 days can reduce insomnia and withdrawal symptoms and improve mood when compared with placebo (88178). It is not clear if this effect is due to tyrosine, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Parkinson disease. Although there is interest in using oral tyrosine for Parkinson disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of tyrosine for this condition.
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Although there is interest in using oral tyrosine for PMS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of tyrosine for this condition.
• Schizophrenia. It is unclear if oral tyrosine is beneficial for improving schizophrenia symptoms. Details: A very small clinical study in patients with schizophrenia shows that taking L-tyrosine 10 grams daily in four divided doses along with molindone 150 mg daily for 3 weeks does not improve symptoms of schizophrenia when compared with taking molindone alone (81554).
• Sleep deprivation. It is unclear if oral tyrosine is beneficial for improving alertness in sleep deprived adults. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking tyrosine 150 mg/kg after the loss of a night's sleep seems to delay performance decline in psychomotor tests by about 3 hours when compared with placebo (7215). Another small clinical study in sleep-deprived patients shows that taking tyrosine 150 mg/kg improves memory, reasoning, and vigilance when compared with placebo at 5.5 hours after ingestion, but not at 1.5 hours. Tyrosine was less effective than taking amphetamine, phentermine, or caffeine (81472).
• Stress. Although there is interest in using oral tyrosine for stress, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of tyrosine for this condition.
• Wrinkled skin. Topical tyrosine has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small study in patients with photodamaged skin shows that applying a topical preparation containing 10% vitamin C, acetyl tyrosine, zinc sulfate, sodium hyaluronate, and bioflavonoids (High Potency Serum, Cellex-C International Inc.) for 3 months to the face seems to improve fine and coarse wrinkling, yellowing and sallowness, roughness, and skin tone when compared with placebo (6155). It is unclear if the benefits are due to tyrosine, other ingredients, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate the effectiveness of tyrosine for these uses.

(Read more about TYROSINE)

EFFECTIVE

• Pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy. Intravenous vitamin B6 is effective for controlling pyridoxine-dependent seizures. Details: Pyridoxine-dependent seizures are a rare type of refractory seizures in neonates that do not respond to anticonvulsant drugs. These seizures are typically controlled within minutes of intravenous administration of pyridoxine, a form of vitamin B6. Pyridoxine-dependent seizures can be due to genetic (autosomal recessive) pyridoxine dependency, or more commonly, a result of the use of high-dose pyridoxine during pregnancy (8197,8198).
• Sideroblastic anemia. Oral vitamin B6 is effective for treating hereditary sideroblastic anemia. Details: Taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) orally is effective for treating hereditary sideroblastic anemia (15,9518). Taking the active form of vitamin B6 (pyridoxal-5'-phosphate) also seems to be effective in cases in which the patient does not respond to pyridoxine (93049).
• Vitamin B6 deficiency. Oral vitamin B6 is effective for preventing and treating vitamin B6 deficiency. Details: Taking oral vitamin B6 can prevent and treat vitamin B6 deficiency (15).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Hyperhomocysteinemia. Taking vitamin B6 orally, alone or in combination with folic acid, is effective for reducing hyperhomocysteinemia. Details: Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) seems to lower homocysteine concentrations when folic acid and vitamin B12 are at physiologic levels or when given with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplements (9451,83042,107136). A combination of vitamin B6 100 mg and folic acid 0.5 mg daily seems to lower homocysteine levels by about 35% and is recommended for people with postprandial hyperhomocysteinemia (1489,9406). Other research shows that taking pyridoxine 50-200 mg daily reduces postprandial homocysteine levels by 32% to 35% (9406,10350). Pyridoxine also seems to reduce homocysteine levels in patients with kidney failure, kidney transplant patients (1489,6884,9414,9415), or patients who receive general anesthesia with nitrous oxide (9481). However, some research in healthy adults suggests that adding pyridoxine to folic acid might not provide any additional benefit over folic acid alone (9400,9405,9409,50145). Hyperhomocysteinemia is considered by some to be an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis, recurrent thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke (1899,3323,9402,9405,9408,9409). However, elevated homocysteine levels may be a marker, as opposed to a cause, of vascular disease (11387,11388). A 5 µmol/L increase in plasma homocysteine increases the risk of cerebrovascular disease by 50% and the odds of coronary heart disease by 60% and 80% in males and females, respectively (9407,9411). However, it is not clear if reducing homocysteine levels results in reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (1489,6883,6884,9308,9400,9405,9409). Folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 supplementation can reduce total homocysteine from 13.4 to 11 µmol/L. However, this reduction does not seem to help with secondary prevention of death or myocardial infarction, and some research even suggests an increase in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk (11387,13482,50423,83050,97619). There is also debate about whether supplementation with homocysteine-lowering B vitamins can reduce the risk of stroke. A number of large clinical studies and meta-analyses show that supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12, alone or in combination, does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with CVD or impaired renal function (11387,13482,50423,83050,96150). However, a more recent meta-analysis shows that B vitamin supplementation modestly reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo in patients at risk for or with a history of CVD (97619). Also, a meta-analysis in patients with a history of stroke shows that B vitamin supplementation modestly reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% and the risk of vascular death by 11% when compared with placebo (107136).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for patients with antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Details: Clinical research in male patients with hyperprolactinemia who are on a consistent antipsychotic dose shows that taking vitamin B6 300 mg twice daily for 16 weeks reduces serum prolactin levels by 68%, compared with 37% in patients taking aripiprazole 5 mg twice daily. Also, 67% of patients taking vitamin B6 had prolactin levels less than 40 mcg/mL versus 2% of those taking aripiprazole (107128).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Oral vitamin B6 seems to decrease urinary oxalate levels and decrease the risk of kidney stone formation in some patients. Details: There is some evidence that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) orally, alone or in combination with magnesium, can decrease urinary oxalate levels in people with type I primary hyperoxaluria, a hereditary disorder (1201,6437,6438,6439,6440,8548,8549,8550). Additionally, a small clinical study in this population suggests that intravenous pyridoxine hydrochloride can reduce urinary oxalate by 25.5% when compared to baseline (90796). In patients with idiopathic hyperoxaluria, taking a combination of pyridoxine 25mg and magnesium oxide 400 mg for 3 months decreases urinary oxalate by approximately 16%, with 68% of patients experiencing a reduction. However, supplementation is less effective than following a low-oxalate diet, which reduces urinary oxalate in 91% of patients by an average of 31% (107127). There is also preliminary evidence that higher pyridoxine intake in females with no history of kidney stones is associated with decreased risk of kidney stone formation (6441), but this association has not been found in males (6442).
• Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oral vitamin B6 may reduce nausea and vomiting in some pregnant patients and is sometimes used in combination with doxylamine. Details: While some conflicting evidence exists, most small clinical studies suggest that oral vitamin B6 is effective for improving nausea and vomiting associated with pregnancy when compared with baseline or placebo. However, vitamin B6 may not be as effective as ginger (110459). Two small clinical studies show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 25 mg every 8 hours for 3-4 days decreases pregnancy-induced nausea severity and vomiting incidence when compared with placebo (6168,16306). A larger clinical trial shows that taking lower doses of vitamin B6, 10 mg every 8 hours over 5 days, improves pregnancy-induced nausea, but not vomiting, when compared with placebo (6167). A small clinical study in patients with mild to moderate nausea and vomiting shows that taking a higher dose of 40 mg twice daily for 4 days is more effective than placebo, but no better than ginger 500 mg twice daily (99404). The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) considers vitamin B6 at a dose of 10-25 mg 3 to 4 times daily a first-line treatment for pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting due to its benign safety profile (111601). However, it is not effective for all patients, such as those with hyperemesis gravidarum, a severe form of pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Adding vitamin B6 20 mg three times daily for 2 weeks to intravenous rehydration, metoclopramide, and thiamine seems to be no more effective than placebo for reducing vomiting in hyperemesis gravidarum (99405). Vitamin B6 is also sometimes used in combination with doxylamine. In fact, a combination of vitamin B6 plus doxylamine (Diclegis or Bonjesta, Duchesnay Inc., and various generics) has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a prescription product111601). ACOG recommends vitamin B6 in combination with doxylamine as another first-line treatment option (111601). However, the clinical trial used to obtain FDA approval has some methodological problems, and the significance of the results has been questioned. The improvement in symptom scores seen with Diclegis was less than one point on a 13-point scale, which is unlikely to be clinically significant (97998). Also, some clinical research shows that taking pyridoxine 25 mg and doxylamine 12.5 mg is less effective than ondansetron 4 mg when taken every 8 hours for 5 days. Only 41% of the patients using pyridoxine and doxylamine had a clinically significant reduction in nausea, compared to 92% of patients using ondansetron (90797). The combination of vitamin B6 and doxylamine is also studied with acupuncture. A large clinical study in patients with moderate to severe pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting conducted in China shows that taking vitamin B6-doxylamine (Diclegis, Duchesnay, Inc) 20 to 40 mg each at bedtime for 14 days in combination with daily acupuncture modestly improves patient-reported nausea and vomiting scores when compared with either intervention alone (111820). However, it is unclear whether this improvement is clinically significant.
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Oral vitamin B6 seems to reduce PMS symptoms. Details: There is some evidence that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) orally can improve symptoms of PMS such as breast pain or tenderness (mastalgia) and depression in some patients. Pyridoxine in doses of at least 50 mg daily, plus magnesium oxide 200 mg daily, seems to relieve PMS-related anxiety and other symptoms (8555,39007,82962). Although some clinicians advocate doses of pyridoxine 200-500 mg daily for PMS, doses of 50-100 mg daily seem to work just as well. There is no apparent dose-response curve for PMS, so the lowest effective dose should be used. Higher doses might increase the risk of side effects (3093).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Age-related cognitive decline. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to slow age-related cognitive decline. Details: One clinical trial in elderly people with memory complaints shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 0.8 mg, vitamin B12 0.5 mg, and vitamin B6 (form not specified) 20 mg daily for 24 months reduces cerebral atrophy in the gray matter regions associated with Alzheimer disease by up to seven-fold when compared with placebo. However, this protection does not occur in patients with the lowest average blood levels of homocysteine (90374). Furthermore, other clinical research shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 3-75 mg daily in combination with folic acid and vitamin B12 does not improve cognitive function in elderly adults (14392,50225,50510).
• Alzheimer disease. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to improve cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer disease when used in combination with other B vitamins. Also, oral vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of developing this condition. Details: Clinical research in patients with probable Alzheimer disease taking routine medications shows that taking vitamin B6 25 mg with folic acid 5 mg and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for 18 months does not have a beneficial effect on cognitive function or the severity of disease when compared with placebo. In this study, all patients were consuming a folate-fortified diet (50319). Also, population research in elderly adults has found that a high intake of vitamin B6 from dietary or supplemental sources is not associated with a decreased risk of Alzheimer disease when compared to lower vitamin B6 intake (13165,15270).
• Carpal tunnel syndrome. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Details: Most research shows that people with carpal tunnel syndrome are not generally deficient in vitamin B6 and do not benefit from taking vitamin B6 supplements (8203,8937,9448,9450,9478,9482). Although early studies by a single group of researchers, as well as anecdotal reports, suggest that taking vitamin B6 may relieve carpal tunnel symptoms, more reliable research has not supported these findings (8202,9445,9447,9449,9483,15955,83086). Vitamin B6 has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A moderate-sized clinical study in adults with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome shows that taking a combination product containing vitamin B6, alpha-lipoic acid, acetyl-L-carnitine, phosphatidylserine, turmeric, and vitamins C, E, B1, B2, and B12 twice daily for 60 days reduces symptom severity and pain but does not improve measures of hand and wrist function when compared with a control (111702). The dose of vitamin B6 was not provided. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of blinding and placebo. Additionally, it is unclear if the effects are due to vitamin B6, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Cataracts. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to slow cataract development. Details: Clinical research in females with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or at increased risk of CVD shows that taking a combination of folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 (form not specified) 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg daily for an average of 7.3 years does not reduce the risk of cataracts when compared with placebo. Furthermore, the risk of cataract extraction was increased by 28% (96149).
• Chemotherapy-induced acral erythema. While some conflicting evidence exists, most research suggests that oral or topical vitamin B6 does not seem to prevent or reduce the severity of acral erythema induced by chemotherapy. Details: A meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials and 4 observational studies shows that taking vitamin B6 60-500 mg daily for up to 8 chemotherapy cycles does not prevent chemotherapy-induced acral erythema or reduce the incidence of severe cases when compared with control. Most studies used capecitabine chemotherapy alone or in combination, and one study used pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; however, no subgroup analysis was conducted to differentiate chemotherapy regimens. Results did not seem to vary based on study location, study design, or vitamin B6 dose (104930). However, a more recent preliminary clinical study in patients receiving doxorubicin for multiple myeloma shows that taking vitamin B6 100 mg on the first day of chemotherapy then twice daily for 7 days with each cycle reduces the risk of developing acral erythema by 72%, but does not improve the severity of acral erythema, when compared with no vitamin B6 supplementation (110458). Also, one small, low-quality clinical study suggests that taking vitamin B6 400 mg daily reduces the risk of moderate or severe chemotherapy-induced acral erythema when compared with vitamin B6 200 mg daily; however, the higher dose also seems to be associated with worsened tumor response and increased treatment failure (97620). Topical vitamin B6 has also failed to show benefit. A small clinical study in patients with acral erythema from capecitabine or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin shows that applying vitamin B6 1% cream to affected areas three times daily for 6 weeks does not improve symptoms when compared with placebo (104929).
• Colorectal adenoma. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of developing colorectal adenomas. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 50 mg, and vitamin B12 1 mg, daily for up to 9.2 years does not reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma in females at high risk of cardiovascular disease when compared with placebo (90389).
• Eclampsia. Oral or intramuscular vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of eclampsia. Details: Meta-analyses of limited clinical research in pregnant patients show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), either as 25 mg daily or a single dose of 100 mg orally or intramuscularly, does not reduce the risk of eclampsia when compared with control (83046,96166).
• Osteoporosis. Oral vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Details: Clinical research in patients with cerebrovascular disease shows that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid 2 mg, vitamin B6 (form not specified) 25 mg, and vitamin B12 500 mcg daily for up to 10.5 years does not prevent osteoporotic fractures when compared with placebo (90377). Furthermore, a secondary analysis of two large studies in patients with cardiovascular disease has found that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 40 mg daily in addition to folic acid and vitamin B12 for 1-3 years is associated with a 42% increased risk of hip fracture over an 11-year period when compared with only folic acid and vitamin B12 (96163). This finding is limited because these studies were not designed to assess the effects of vitamin B6 on fracture risk and the analyses were not adjusted for baseline bone health or fall risk.
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral or intramuscular vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia. Details: Meta-analyses of limited clinical research in pregnant patients show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), either as 25 mg daily or a single dose of 100 mg orally or intramuscularly, does not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia when compared with placebo (83046,96166).
• Preterm labor. Oral or intramuscular vitamin B6 does not seem to reduce the risk of preterm labor. Details: Meta-analyses of limited clinical research in pregnant patients shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), either as 25 mg daily or a single dose of 100 mg orally or intramuscularly, does not reduce the risk of preterm labor when compared with placebo (83046,96166).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults and children with inflammatory acne shows that taking 1-4 tablets of a specific product (NicAzel, Elorac Inc.) containing vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), nicotinamide, azelaic acid, zinc, copper, and folic acid for 8 weeks reduces inflammatory lesions and improves appearance in 88% and 81% of patients, respectively, when compared to baseline (90800). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large-scale clinical study shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 50 mg, vitamin B12 1000 mcg, and folic acid 2.5 mg daily reduces the risk for AMD in females over 40 years of age with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or with risk factors for CVD. Those who took this combination for an average of 7.3 years had a 34% reduced risk of developing AMD and a 41% reduced risk of visually significant AMD when compared with placebo (14620). It is unclear if this effect is due to vitamin B6, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Angioplasty. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Some evidence suggests that vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 10 mg, folic acid 1 mg, and vitamin B12 400 mcg daily can decrease the rate of restenosis in patients treated with balloon angioplasty (8009,9412). However, this combination does not seem to be as effective for reducing restenosis in patients after coronary stenting (8009). An intravenous loading dose of folic acid, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), and vitamin B12 followed by oral administration of folic acid 1.2 mcg, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 48 mg, and vitamin B12 60 mcg daily after bare metal coronary stenting also does not seem to reduce restenosis and might actually increase restenosis (12150,12151). Due to the lack of evidence of benefit and potential for harm, this combination of vitamins should not be recommended for patients receiving coronary stents (12151). It is unclear if any effects are due to vitamin B6, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Antipsychotic-induced metabolic side effects. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6, as an adjunct to progesterone, is beneficial in patients with antipsychotic-induced amenorrhea. Details: A small clinical study in females with antipsychotic-induced amenorrhea shows that taking vitamin B6 80 mg three times daily for 1 month plus intramuscular progesterone daily for 5 days increases levels of estradiol and follicle stimulating hormone, reduces prolactin levels, and increases the rate of clinical efficacy, defined as the normalization of menstruation and improvement in endocrine indicators, by 14% when compared with progesterone alone (110457).
• Anxiety. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with anxiety. Details: Clinical research in college students shows that taking vitamin B6 100 mg daily for one month does not reduce anxiety scores when compared with placebo (110453). However, because a diagnosis of anxiety was not a requirement for study participation, it is unclear if these findings can be generalized to patients diagnosed with anxiety.
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with asthma. Details: Preliminary clinical studies show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 200-300 mg daily may improve symptoms of asthma in some patients, but not others, when compared with placebo (7064,7065). Studies have yielded conflicting results, with some research suggesting that it may only be beneficial in children with severe asthma (7065). Additionally, some research suggests that theophylline may lower vitamin B6 levels, although it is unclear if vitamin B6 supplementation is beneficial (4522,7066,9503).
• Atherosclerosis. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with intermediate risk for coronary heart disease shows that taking a specific supplement (Kyolic, Total Heart Health, Formula 108, Wakunga) containing vitamin B6 12.5 mg, aged garlic extract 250 mg, vitamin B12 100 mcg, folic acid 300 mcg, and L-arginine 100 mg daily for 12 months reduces coronary artery calcium progression when compared with placebo (88385). It is unclear if this effect is due to vitamin B6, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with eczema. Details: A small clinical study in children with eczema shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) 50 mg daily for 4 weeks does not reduce symptoms such as redness and itchiness when compared with placebo (83090).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for ADHD. Details: A small crossover study in children with ADHD shows that taking vitamin B6 600 mg, niacinamide and ascorbic acid 3 grams, and calcium pantothenate 1.2 grams daily for 6 weeks does not improve behavior scores when compared with placebo (9957).
• Autism spectrum disorder. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B6 for autism, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B6 for this condition.
• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with type 1 bipolar disorder who are taking lithium and experiencing an acute episode of mania shows that taking vitamin B6 80 mg daily for 8 weeks does not improve cognitive function or the severity of mania when compared with placebo. Cognitive function was reduced in patients taking vitamin B6; any effect on sleep was unclear (107132).
• Cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces overall cancer risk. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin B6 is associated with a 22% reduced risk of cancer, including esophageal, pancreatic, gastric, colorectal, and breast cancer. However, when dietary and supplemental vitamin B6 intake is considered, the inverse association between vitamin B6 and cancer risk is weaker and limited to fewer tumor sites. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of 9 clinical studies shows that taking vitamin B6 3-100 mg orally daily for 2-7.3 years, in combination with vitamin B12 and folate, does not reduce the risk of cancer in patients with cardiovascular disease or kidney failure (96164).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral vitamin B6, taken along with other B vitamins, does not seem to improve secondary prevention of death or myocardial infarction in patients with CVD. However, it might slightly lower the risk of stroke. Details: Overall evidence from clinical research and meta-analyses shows that taking vitamin B6 in combination with folic acid and/or vitamin B12 does not seem to help with secondary prevention of death or myocardial infarction in patients with or at risk for CVD (11387,13482,34540,50423,83050,90379,97619). In fact, some research suggests that long-term supplementation with vitamin B6, folic acid, and vitamin B12 for secondary prevention increases the risk of CVD by 20% despite lowering homocysteine levels by 30% (13482). However, some research shows that taking vitamin B6 in combination with other B vitamins modestly reduces the risk of stroke, although results are conflicting (11387,13482,50423,83050,96150,96165,97619,107136). Additionally, it is unclear which specific combination of B vitamins is optimal for reducing stroke risk and which patients are most likely to benefit. In 2001, prior to the publication of the highest quality research on this topic, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368).
• Cognitive function. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in healthy adults aged 40-65 years shows that taking a supplement containing vitamin B6, ginkgo leaf, bacopa, and other B vitamins twice daily for 12 weeks does not improve memory or attention when compared with placebo (111334).
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces the risk of colorectal cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of observational studies suggests that the highest dietary intake of vitamin B6 is associated with a 20% reduced risk of colorectal cancer when compared with the lowest dietary intake. However, this association was not shown in subgroup analyses of studies conducted in Australia, Europe, or North America (111600). The validity of this analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies.
• Dental caries. There is limited evidence on the oral use of vitamin B6 for dental decay during pregnancy. Details: Meta-analyses of limited clinical research show that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), 25 mg daily or a single dose of 100 mg orally or intramuscularly, may reduce the risk of dental decay during pregnancy when compared with placebo (83046,96166).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces the risk of developing depression or improves symptoms of depression. Details: Clinical research in healthy college students shows that taking vitamin B6 100 mg daily for one month does not reduce depression scores when compared with placebo (1104453). However, because a diagnosis of depression was not a requirement for study participation, it is unclear if these findings can be generalized to patients diagnosed with depression. Whether vitamin B6 reduces the risk of developing depression is also unclear. A meta-analysis of population research has found that the highest dietary intake of vitamin B6 is associated with a 19% lower risk of depression when compared with the lowest intake. However, sub-analyses suggest that this association is only relevant in females and not males (107133). In one individual population study in community dwelling older adults included in the analysis, the consumption of at least 1.71 mg of vitamin B6 daily from food was associated with a 43% reduction in the likelihood of becoming depressed when compared with the consumption of 1.33 mg or less daily in females. However, there was no association between vitamin B6 levels and risk of depression in males, and the finding in females was no longer significant when adjusted for total energy intake, since foods rich in vitamin B6 are energy-dense (96168). Another observational longitudinal study in healthy adults starting oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel has found that taking vitamin B6 25 mg daily for 6-12 months is associated with a 40% lower risk of depression when compared with no supplementation (90789). Most available studies are cross-sectional in nature, making any conclusions related to causation difficult.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with type 2 diabetes or gestational diabetes. Details: Observational research in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes has found that dietary intake of vitamin B6 in the highest quartile is associated with 53% lower odds of developing cardiovascular disease, defined as a non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina, when compared with vitamin B6 intake in the lowest quartile (110452). Small clinical studies in patients with gestational diabetes and vitamin B6 deficiency shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 100 mg daily for 2 weeks improves glucose tolerance and blood glucose levels when compared with baseline (82967,83088). However, there is concern that these findings were confounded by dietary alterations. This benefit was not observed in a subsequent small case series in patients with gestational diabetes (22380).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research suggests that taking a combination of B vitamins, including folic acid (L-methylfolate), vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin), and vitamin B6 (pyridoxal-5'-phosphate) for 24 weeks does not improve neural dysfunction based on vibration perception when compared with placebo in patients with diabetic neuropathy. However, taking this combination appears to modestly improve neuropathy symptoms and quality of life related to mental functioning when compared with placebo (90375).
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with dysmenorrhea. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking vitamin B6 (form not specified) 200 mg daily reduces pain associated with dysmenorrhea when compared with placebo. However, taking vitamin B6 in combination with magnesium does not reduce pain when compared with placebo (77388).
• Fibromyalgia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with fibromyalgia. Details: A small clinical study in patients with fibromyalgia shows that taking vitamin B6 80 mg daily for 8 weeks does not improve pain, disease severity, anxiety, depression, or quality of life when compared with placebo (110454).
• Gastroenteritis-associated nausea and vomiting. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in children with gastroenteritis. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 6 months to 12 years with acute viral gastroenteritis shows that taking vitamin B6 (form not specified) does not improve symptoms of dehydration or the frequency of vomiting when compared with placebo (90793).
• Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for Helicobacter pylori. Details: A large clinical study in adults with Helicobacter pylori infection shows that taking vitamin B6 20 mg twice daily for 2 weeks alongside conventional quadruple therapy does not improve eradication rates when compared with a control group not receiving vitamin B6 (113551). Conventional therapy consisted of a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, minocycline, and metronidazole. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of placebo and inadequate blinding.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces blood pressure. Details: One small clinical study in patients with essential hypertension shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) 5 mg/kg daily for 4 weeks can reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure when compared with baseline (83091). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Hypertriglyceridemia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces triglyceride levels. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that vitamin B6 (form not specified) 50 mg daily for 12 weeks does not reduce triglyceride levels in people with hypertriglyceridemia when compared with placebo. However, vitamin B6 appears to decrease total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by approximately 9% in these patients (59028).
• Infertility. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B6 for infertility, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B6 for this condition.
• Insomnia. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in healthy adults with self-reported sleep difficulty shows that taking a specific product (LZ Complex3, Sanofi Consumer Healthcare Pty Ltd.) containing vitamin B6, zizyphus extract, hops extract, hydrolyzed milk protein (Lactium), and magnesium oxide nightly, 30 minutes before bed, for 2 weeks does not improve sleep quality, daytime functioning, or physical fatigue when compared with placebo. However, due to the large improvement seen in both the treatment and placebo groups, the effectiveness of this product is unclear (95971).
• Isoniazid-induced neuropathy. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 prevents the development of neuropathy in patients taking isoniazid. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients taking isoniazid for tuberculosis shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 6 mg daily reduces the development of neuropathy when compared with control (83068).
• Lactation. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 helps to suppress postpartum lactation. Details: A meta-analysis of two small clinical trials shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 400-600 mg daily for 6-7 days postpartum does not suppress lactation when compared with no treatment (83047).
• Levetiracetam-induced side effects. While some conflicting evidence exists, several small, low-quality studies suggest that oral vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) may reduce some neuropsychiatric adverse effects related to the use of levetiracetam. Details: In an analysis of case reports, retrospective studies, and a single low-quality prospective study, improvement in levetiracetam-associated neuropsychiatric symptoms occurred in approximately 73% of patients taking pyridoxine (107137). A more recent preliminary clinical trial in children ages 1-17 years shows that taking pyridoxine 10 or 15 mg/kg daily as needed based on symptoms improves behavioral side effects associated with levetiracetam by a small amount when compared with low-dose pyridoxine 0.5 mg/kg daily used as placebo (107124). Also, observational research in children ages 9 months to 14 years has found that taking vitamin B6 is associated with improved behavior and a 44% lower risk of levetiracetam discontinuation when compared with no vitamin B6 supplementation (110455). Some observational research in adults with levetiracetam-associated irritability has found that taking vitamin B6 is associated with an improvement in irritability in 45% of patients when compared to baseline (107129). However, a small clinical trial in adults with epilepsy shows that taking pyridoxine 40 mg daily for 3 weeks does not improve levetiracetam-related psychiatric adverse effects when compared with placebo (110456). This study may have been underpowered to detect differences between groups. Pyridoxine doses used in the studies above have ranged from 50-400 mg daily in children and 40-600 mg daily in adults (107124,107129,107137,110456).
• Lung cancer. It is unclear if dietary or oral vitamin B6 reduces lung cancer risk. Details: Epidemiological research has found that higher serum levels of vitamin B6 in male smokers is associated with a lower risk of lung cancer (9454). Also, people with blood levels of vitamin B6 in the top quartile have a modestly lower risk of lung cancer when compared with those whose levels are in the lowest quartile. The association is stronger for males and for people who have smoked (97999). However, other epidemiological research found that increased dietary intake of vitamin B6 is not associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer (96164).
• Menopausal symptoms. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B6 for menopausal symptoms, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B6 for this condition.
• Motion sickness. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin B6 for motion sickness, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin B6 for this condition.
• Nausea and vomiting. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for nausea and vomiting in patients taking oral contraceptives or antibiotics for Helicobacter pylori. Details: A large clinical study in adults with Helicobacter pylori infection shows that taking vitamin B6 20 mg twice daily for 2 weeks alongside conventional quadruple therapy reduces the incidence and severity of gastrointestinal adverse effects when compared with a control group not receiving vitamin B6 (113551). Conventional therapy consisted of a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, minocycline, and metronidazole. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of placebo and inadequate blinding. An observational longitudinal study in healthy females taking oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel has found that taking vitamin B6 25 mg daily for 6-12 months is associated with a 43% reduced risk of nausea when compared with no supplementation (90789).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 for patients with NAFLD. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with NAFLD shows that taking vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 30 mg three times daily for 12 weeks does not reduce levels of liver transaminases or plasma lipids when compared with baseline. However, hepatic fat accumulation was modestly reduced (107130). The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 in beneficial in overweight or obese individuals. Details: A small clinical trial in females with a body mass index (BMI) of at least 25 kg/m² shows that taking vitamin B6 as pyridoxine 80 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces fat mass and improves insulin resistance and triglyceride levels by a small amount when compared with placebo. Although some other anthropometric and metabolic indices were improved when compared with baseline, there was no effect of pyridoxine on body weight, visceral adiposity, or other endpoints when compared with placebo (107131).
• Overall mortality. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces the risk of overall mortality. Details: Observational research in US adults has found that dietary intake of vitamin B6 in the highest quintile is associated with a 12% to 21% lower risk of all-cause mortality and a 31% to 44% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality when compared with the lowest quintile of dietary vitamin B6 intake (110451).
• Pancreatic cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer. Details: Observational research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin B6 is associated with a 37% lower risk of developing pancreatic cancer when compared with lower intake (104927).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with postpartum depression. Details: Preliminary clinical research in individuals considered at increased risk for postpartum depression, but without clinical depression, shows that taking vitamin B6 80 mg daily from the 28th week of pregnancy until birth, and then 40 mg daily for one month, reduces symptoms of depression 1.5 months after birth when compared with baseline (measured during the third trimester) and when compared with placebo. However, it is unclear if any of the patients included in the study developed postpartum depression, as there were no changes in overall symptoms in patients taking placebo (107126).
• Proton pump inhibitor-induced gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for proton pump inhibitor-induced GI symptoms. Details: A large clinical study in adults with Helicobacter pylori infection shows that taking vitamin B6 20 mg twice daily for 2 weeks alongside conventional quadruple therapy reduces the incidence and severity of gastrointestinal adverse effects when compared with a control group not receiving vitamin B6 (113551). Conventional therapy consisted of a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, minocycline, and metronidazole. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of placebo and inadequate blinding.
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial in patients with RLS. Details: A small clinical study in adults with RLS who are beginning treatment with pramipexole shows that also taking vitamin B6 40 mg daily for 2 months moderately improves RLS scores and sleep quality scores when compared with pramipexole and placebo (110052).
• Schizophrenia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Details: Clinical research in male patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia who are on a consistent antipsychotic dose shows that adding vitamin B6 300 mg twice daily for 16 weeks modestly improves psychotic symptoms and some measures of cognitive performance when compared with adding aripiprazole 5 mg twice daily (107128). More research is needed to determine if these benefits are clinically relevant.
• Seizures. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 is beneficial for preventing seizures in patients with glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) deficiency. Details: Observational case series in a small number of children and young adults with GPI deficiency has found that taking vitamin B6 20-30 mg/kg daily for 3-12 months is associated with some reduction in seizure frequency in 9 of 13 patients. However, no patient reached seizure freedom (107125,107135). In one case series, treatment for 12 months was associated with modest developmental improvements in almost all patients (107135). The study patient populations were slightly different in terms of age and underlying genetic causes for GPI deficiency.
• Sickle cell disease. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other B vitamins; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with sickle cell disease shows that taking vitamin B6 4.2-6 mg, vitamin B12 4.2-6 mcg, and folic acid 700 mcg daily might lower homocysteine levels. However, it is unknown if this will reduce the risk of endothelial damage in these patients (9324).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6, either alone or with other B vitamins, is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: There is some debate about whether supplementation with homocysteine-lowering B vitamins, including vitamin B6, can reduce the risk of stroke. A number of clinical studies and meta-analyses show that supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12, alone or in combination, does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or impaired kidney function (11387,13482,50423,83050,96150). However, a more recent meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials, including over 44,000 patients at risk for or with a history of CVD, shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke by 10% when compared with placebo (97619). This meta-analysis differed from some of the earlier analyses due to the inclusion of several additional clinical trials. Also, another meta-analysis of three clinical trials including 9900 patients with a history of stroke shows that B vitamin supplementation reduces the relative risk of stroke recurrence by 13% when compared with placebo, although this finding was determined to have a low level of certainty. Based on two clinical trials, there was also a 17% reduced risk of vascular death and an 11% reduction in the combined risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death (107136). In 2001, prior to the publication of the highest quality research on this topic, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed a qualified health claim stating that, as part of a well-balanced diet that is low in saturated fat and cholesterol, folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 may reduce the risk of vascular disease (102368). Unfortunately, even after the publication of higher quality research, it is still unclear which specific combination of B vitamins is optimal and which patients are most likely to benefit. One network meta-analysis shows that a combination of folic acid and vitamin B6 lowers the risk of stroke more effectively than B vitamin mixtures that include vitamin B12 (96165). However, this analysis is limited because it didn't account for dosing. Exposure to low, but not high amounts, of vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) seems to reduce stroke risk (96150).
• Tardive dyskinesia. It is unclear if oral vitamin B6 prevents tardive dyskinesia in patients taking neuroleptic drugs. Details: A small clinical study in patients taking neuroleptic drugs for schizophrenia shows that taking vitamin B6 (form not specified) 400 mg daily seems to improve Parkinsonian, dystonic, and dyskinetic symptoms when compared with placebo (8558).
• Tourette syndrome. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small, nonblinded clinical study in children aged 4-17 years with untreated Tourette syndrome or with chronic tic disorder and associated symptoms of anxiety shows that taking a liquid nutritional supplement providing vitamin B6 2.8 mg and L-theanine 200 mg daily for 2 months improves scores on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale, but does not reduce anxiety, when compared with patients receiving psychoeducation (108555). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Vincristine-induced neuropathy. Oral vitamin B6 has only been evaluated in combination with pyridostigmine; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children ages 11 months to 13 years with neuropathy due to vincristine treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, shows that taking vitamin B6 150 mg/m2 and pyridostigmine 3 mg/kg twice daily for 3 months is associated with reduced severity of sensory and motor neuropathy when compared with baseline (104928). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group. More evidence is needed to rate vitamin B6 for these uses.

(Read more about VITAMIN B6)

EFFECTIVE

• Vitamin C deficiency. Oral or intramuscular vitamin C is effective for preventing or treating vitamin C deficiency. Details: Administering vitamin C orally or intramuscularly prevents and treats vitamin C deficiency, including scurvy. Vitamin C administration can reverse complications of scurvy within 2 days to 3 weeks (4844). In newborns with transient tyrosinemia due to vitamin C deficiency, oral or intramuscular vitamin C can correct this condition (15).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Anemia of chronic disease. Oral vitamin C seems to improve markers of anemia in patients on hemodialysis. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research in hemodialysis patients with anemia shows that treatment with vitamin C 200-300 mg three times weekly for 3-6 months increases hemoglobin levels by approximately 0.9 grams/dL, increases transferrin saturation by about 8%, and decreases the required recombinant human erythropoietin dose by 17 U/kg weekly when compared with standard care (83447,83475).
• Atrial fibrillation. Oral and intravenous vitamin C seems to help prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgeries. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking vitamin C prior to and after cardiac surgery reduces the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation by 27% to 53%. Most studies administered vitamin C at doses of 1-2 grams orally daily for 1-3 days prior to cardiac surgery, followed by 1-2 grams in two divided doses daily for 4-5 days after cardiac surgery. Some studies provided vitamin C intravenously at similar doses, but oral vitamin C seems to be more effective (91233,96703,96705). Despite these findings, a meta-analysis of clinical research conducted only in the U.S. does not support the benefit of vitamin C for reducing postoperative atrial fibrillation (96703). These differences may be related to lifestyle factors such as nutrition, as well as differences in hospital treatments. Vitamin C has also been studied in combination with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) with evidence of benefit (90701).
• Bowel preparation. Powdered vitamin C is approved for use as part of a polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Details: Clinical research shows that treatment with 2 liters of oral solution containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus vitamin C achieves a similar quality of bowel cleansing as treatment with 4 liters of PEG when administered on the evening prior to colonoscopy or when administered in a split-dose regimen. Patients given 2 liters of PEG plus vitamin C solution also have better adherence and experience fewer adverse events, such as nausea, vomiting, or abdominal bloating, compared to patients treated with 4 liters of PEG solution without vitamin C (90413,90415,90420,90424,90428). This treatment also appears to be effective and tolerable in elderly patients aged 60-79 years, including those with poor bowel habits and a high number of comorbidities (108085). Other clinical research in older adults undergoing bowel preparation for colonoscopy also shows that taking 1 liter of PEG plus vitamin C (CleanViewAL, Taejoon Pharm) results in similar quality of bowel cleansing overall and per segment with similar tolerability and adverse effects as sodium picosulfate 170 mL plus magnesium citrate or oral sulfate solution alone (111297,112476). The most common PEG plus vitamin C preparation used in clinical research is MoviPrep (Norgine BV), which contains macrogol 3350 100 grams, sodium sulfate 7.5 grams, sodium chloride 2.7 grams, potassium chloride 1 gram, vitamin C 4.7 grams, and sodium ascorbate 5.9 grams per liter of solution (90413,90415,90424). In the U.S., MoviPrep is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for bowel preparation prior to a colonoscopy.
• Cataracts. Dietary and supplemental intake of vitamin C may reduce the risk of developing cataracts. Details: Population research suggests that people with the highest total intake of vitamin C have about a 19% reduced risk of developing cataracts when compared with those with the lowest total intake, with the most benefit observed for nuclear cataracts (96711). Additionally, another observational study shows that higher supplemental intake of vitamin C over 10 years is associated with a 60% reduction in the incidence of nuclear and cortical cataracts (4208). Other population research suggests that individuals with the highest blood levels of vitamin C have a 33% lower odds of developing age-related cataract, but any benefit is limited to Asian populations (90944). An umbrella review of meta-analyses also shows that dietary intake of vitamin C is associated with a 27% lower odds of cataract development (112095). However, a prospective clinical study shows that a combination of vitamin C, vitamin E, and beta-carotene does not prevent age-related loss of vision from cataracts in well-nourished people with an average supplementation duration of 6.3 years (7304).
• Common cold. Oral high-dose vitamin C might modestly shorten and reduce cold symptoms; however, taking vitamin C prophylactically does not seem to prevent the development of a cold. Details: There is substantial controversy about the effectiveness of vitamin C for treating the common cold (1969,1989,7100,9835,9836). The majority of evidence shows that taking high doses of vitamin C orally might decrease the duration of cold symptoms by 1-1.5 days in some patients (1966,1967,1968,1987,6458,7102,9832,83487). However, other studies have found no effect with doses up to 3 grams daily (9833). A meta-analysis of clinical research in healthy children and adults shows that taking vitamin C 1-4 grams daily for one week to 5 months reduces cold severity by 13%, limits absences from daily activities, and improves the duration of severe symptoms, but does not reduce the duration of mild symptoms, when compared with placebo (113665). Vitamin C has also been investigated for preventing the common cold. A meta-analysis of clinical research suggests that vitamin C supplementation decreases the incidence of cold in individuals exposed to physical stress, but not in the general population (83487). Other research suggests vitamin C may be more effective for treating cold symptoms in children than in adults. Also, there may be a dose-dependent response; doses of at least 2 grams daily seem to work better than 1 gram doses (9834). Taking vitamin C supplements prophylactically does not decrease the risk of catching a cold (1966,1967,1968,1987,3042,6458,7101,9832). Dietary intake of vitamin C also does not seem to affect the risk of getting a cold (10780).
• Complex regional pain syndrome. Most research shows that taking oral vitamin C after a distal radius (i.e. wrist) fracture or surgery seems to reduce the risk of developing complex regional pain. However, it is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial in reducing the risk of complex regional pain in other orthopedic surgeries. Details: Although some research has found no benefit in patients with distal radius (i.e. wrist) fractures (90411,96702), most clinical research shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg daily, and possibly doses of up to 1500 mg daily, for 45-50 days beginning immediately after fracture can reduce the risk of developing complex regional pain syndrome (2045,16302,96700,96706). Reasons for discrepancies are unclear but might relate to differences in diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome (96702). Research in patients undergoing various orthopedic surgeries has also shown benefit with the use of vitamin C for the prevention of complex regional pain syndrome; however, some findings are conflicting. (90422,108076,115613). One meta-analysis of clinical research in patients undergoing ankle, foot, or wrist surgery shows that taking vitamin C 500-1000 mg for 42-50 days following surgery reduces the rate of complex regional pain syndrome, and may improve pain following ankle or foot surgery, when compared with placebo (108076). The validity of these findings is limited by the high heterogeneity of included trials. An additional meta-analysis of clinical research in patients undergoing a broader variety of orthopedic surgery types (i.e., ankle, foot, knee, shoulder, wrist) shows that taking vitamin C 500 to 1500 mg does not reduce the incidence of complex regional pain syndrome (115613). The reasons for these discrepant findings are unclear but may relate to the inclusion of a wide range of orthopedic surgeries.
• Exercise-induced respiratory infections. High-dose oral vitamin C seems to reduce the risk of respiratory infections associated with strenuous exercise. Details: Some preliminary clinical research suggests that prophylactic use of vitamin C in doses of 600 mg to 1 gram daily for 3-8 weeks before heavy physical exercise, such as a marathon, might prevent upper respiratory infections that sometimes follow heavy exercise (9831,83370). More recently, high doses of vitamin C have been studied. A large clinical study in army recruits undergoing basic military training shows that taking vitamin C 6 grams daily for one month reduces the odds of getting a cold by 20% when compared with placebo (102975).
• Hypercholesterolemia. Oral vitamin C seems to reduce lipid levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg daily for at least 4 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by about 8 mg/dL and reduces triglycerides by about 20 mg/dL when compared with control (83445).
• Hypertension. Oral vitamin C seems to modestly reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension, but some evidence is conflicting. Details: Vitamin C seems to modestly reduce systolic blood pressure (SBP), without meaningful effects on diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (2044,9822,13162,83483,102974). A meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials in patients with hypertension, with or without other comorbidities, shows that taking a median dose of vitamin C 500 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces SBP but not DBP by about 5 mmHg. Some of the studies used vitamin C in combination with other supplements, such as vitamin E and magnesium. When studies assessing vitamin C alone were analyzed, the magnitude of reduction in SBP decreased (83483). A newer meta-analysis of small clinical studies in patients with essential hypertension shows that taking vitamin C 200 mg or more daily reduces SBP by about 4 mmHg and DBP by about 2 mmHg (102974). However, this newer analysis omitted numerous relevant studies and included studies with normotensive patients and those without an adequate control, limiting the validity of its findings. In contrast, a network meta-analysis of small, low-quality clinical studies comparing five different vitamins in adults with essential hypertension shows that vitamin C does not reduce SBP, DBP, mean 24-hour SBP, mean 24-hour DBP, or heart rate when compared with placebo and when indirectly compared with vitamin B2, vitamin D, vitamin E, and folic acid. However, the included studies were of low quality and high heterogeneity, particularly in dosing, limiting the validity of the results (113668).
• Laser skin resurfacing. Topical vitamin C seems to reduce erythema occurring after cosmetic laser skin resurfacing procedures intended to reduce scars and wrinkles. Details: There is some evidence that an aqueous formulation of topical vitamin C can decrease the degree and duration of erythema following cutaneous carbon dioxide laser resurfacing for scar and wrinkle removal (1959).
• Lead toxicity. Dietary vitamin C seems to lower concentrations of lead in the blood. Details: Observational research has found that consuming more vitamin C from dietary sources is associated with lower blood concentrations of lead. People who consumed at least 340 mg of vitamin C daily as part of the diet had lower blood lead levels than those who consumed less than 100 mg vitamin C daily (3097,3098,3099).
• Nitrate tolerance. Oral vitamin C might prevent nitrate tolerance in some patients. Details: Small clinical studies show that taking vitamin C orally seems to prevent the development of nitrate tolerance in patients taking sublingual nitroglycerin. There is some evidence that short-term vitamin C supplementation can prevent tolerance to the vasodilatory effects of nitrates (1441,1961).
• Postoperative pain. Oral or intravenous vitamin C might prevent acute postoperative pain following certain surgeries. It is unclear if vitamin C reduces chronic postoperative pain. Details: A meta-analysis of 7 small clinical studies in adults undergoing elective surgery shows that receiving perioperative vitamin C, either as 1 gram orally, 2-3 grams intravenously, or 50 mg/kg intravenously, modestly reduces acute pain and opioid requirements for up to 24 hours when compared with control (105457). Most surgeries were laparoscopic and included cholecystectomy, colectomy, hysterectomy; two non-laparoscopic surgeries included uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with tonsillectomy and major abdominal surgery (90418,99840,105457). A meta-analysis of clinical trials in adults undergoing noncardiac surgery (i.e., orthopedic, abdominal, gynecologic, kidney transplantation) shows that administering perioperative vitamin C, either orally or intravenously, reduces postoperative intravenous morphine requirements at 2, 24, and 48 hours after surgery and improves pain scores at 2, 6, and 24 hours after surgery when compared with placebo. The dose of vitamin C did not appear to impact outcomes. However, when only laparoscopic surgeries are included, perioperative vitamin C does not improve pain or morphine use when compared with placebo (108087). Use of vitamin C perioperatively has also been evaluated in other surgery types with generally similar outcomes. A moderate-sized clinical study in adults undergoing total hip arthroplasty shows that intravenous vitamin C 3 grams perioperatively reduces 24-hour post-operative morphine use and subjective pain scores when compared with placebo; however, these improvements do not appear to be clinically significant (115500). The validity of these results is limited by a short follow-up period. Additionally, a small observational study in adults undergoing surgery for wisdom tooth extraction shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg three times daily for 7 days in addition to standard treatment reduces pain 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery when compared with control (113664). However, a moderate-sized clinical study in adults undergoing transurethral resection of a bladder tumor under general anesthesia shows that administering intravenous vitamin C 1 gram after induction of anesthesia reduces the incidence and severity of catheter-related bladder discomfort immediately after surgery and at 1 and 2 hours postoperatively, but not 6 hours, when compared with placebo. Further, vitamin C does not reduce postoperative pain scores or analgesic requirements when compared with placebo (111645). Vitamin C has also been evaluated for reducing chronic pain after surgery. Clinical research in patients undergoing surgery for foot or ankle trauma shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg orally twice daily postoperatively for 6 weeks reduces pain scores when compared with placebo at 2 weeks and 6 weeks. The mean total amount of diclofenac used for pain relief over the 6-week period is also reduced, from 5.7 grams with placebo to 3.4 grams with vitamin C (102131).
• Wrinkled skin. Topical vitamin C might reduce the appearance of existing wrinkles. Details: Topical preparations containing vitamin C seem to improve the appearance of wrinkled skin. Some evidence shows that vitamin C 3% applied for 12 weeks might reduce facial wrinkles (14008). A small clinical study shows that applying a dissolving microneedle patch containing vitamin C 5.6% every 4 days for 12 weeks to crow's feet on one side of the face reduces wrinkles when compared to control treatment applied on the other side of the face (98780). Other clinical research in females aged 30-60 years shows that applying an oil-soluble cream containing the vitamin C derivative tetra-isopalmitoyl ascorbic acid 1%, 2%, or 3% to the periorbital area twice daily for 8 weeks reduces visual wrinkle grading when compared with placebo. A dose analysis shows greater improvements in wrinkle parameters, average wrinkle depth, and mean depth with the lower concentration, while greater improvements in maximum roughness and maximum depth are observed with the higher concentration (108072). This study only included individuals defined as having Fitzpatrick skin type III or IV; it effects on other skin types is unclear. Preparations containing vitamin C in combination with other ingredients have also been investigated. A small low-quality trial in females with moderately photodamaged and hyperpigmented facial skin shows that applying a moisturizer with vitamin C 30%, vitamin E, and coenzyme Q10 once daily in the morning, along with applying retinol 0.5% once daily or once every other day for 12 weeks, seems to improve skin tone, photodamage, and wrinkles when compared to baseline (99085). In another small trial, a topical preparation containing vitamin C 10% as L-ascorbic acid along with acetyl tyrosine, zinc sulfate, sodium hyaluronate, and bioflavonoids (Cellex-C High Potency Serum) applied to photo-aged facial skin for 3 months improves fine and coarse wrinkling, yellowing and sallowness, roughness, and skin tone when compared with placebo (6155). It is unclear if the beneficial effects of these products are due to vitamin C, other ingredients, or the combination.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Acute bronchitis. Oral vitamin C doesn't seem to improve symptoms of acute bronchitis. Details: A clinical study in adults with acute bronchitis shows that taking vitamin C orally 500 mg on day 1, then 250 mg on days 2 through 5 (similar to an azithromycin regimen) doesn't seem to have any effect on quality of life or bronchitis duration when compared with azithromycin (9827).
• Asthma. Oral vitamin C doesn't seem to prevent asthma or improve lung function. Details: Although some observational research has found that some patients with asthma might have lower serum vitamin C levels (5873), other observational research found that increased dietary vitamin C intake is not associated with a reduced risk of asthma or improved lung function (15006,34567). In addition, clinical research shows that supplemental intake of vitamin C does not reduce asthma symptoms, improve lung function, or reduce the use of inhaled steroids in asthma patients (90409).
• Atherosclerosis. Oral vitamin C does not seem to reduce the progression of atherosclerosis. Details: A clinical study shows that taking a specific combination product containing slow-release vitamin C 250 mg and vitamin E 136 IU (CellaVie, Ferrosan A/S) twice daily modestly slows the 3-year progression of atherosclerosis of the carotid artery in males, but not females. This result persisted at a 6-year follow-up of this study (1918,10473). However, when this form of vitamin C is used alone, it does not slow the 3-year progression of atherosclerosis of the carotid artery (1918).
• Bladder cancer. Oral vitamin C does not reduce the risk of bladder cancer or mortality from bladder cancer. Details: Epidemiological research has found that supplemental vitamin C intake is not associated with mortality rate in patients with bladder cancer (9839). A secondary analysis of a large clinical trial, the Physicians' Health Study II, in healthy men aged at least 50 years also shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg daily alone or with vitamin E 400 IU daily for up to 10 years does not reduce the risk of developing bladder cancer or bladder cancer-related deaths when compared with placebo (90097).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral vitamin C does not seem to be beneficial for either primary or secondary CVD prevention. Details: Vitamin C does not seem to be beneficial for primary prevention of CVD. Some population research has found that higher supplemental vitamin C or dietary vitamin C has been associated with a reduced risk of developing CVD (10358,14108,109779), while other observational research has found no benefit (34566,10358,14108). However, meta-analyses of clinical research in healthy patients show that vitamin C supplementation does not prevent CVD or coronary heart disease when compared with control (97308,104025). In 2004, the American Heart Association stated that current evidence does not justify use of antioxidants such as vitamin C for reducing the risk of CVD (12142). Evidence is also negative for secondary prevention in people with coronary heart disease. Population studies have found that higher serum vitamin C was associated with no effect or decreased CVD mortality from CVD (3910,5878). A meta-analysis of two large clinical trials shows that vitamin C supplementation does not reduce CVD events or CVD mortality when compared with control (97308).
• Colorectal cancer. Oral vitamin C does not seem to prevent colorectal cancer. Details: Population research has found that dietary vitamin C intake is not associated with a reduced risk of developing colon cancer. When total vitamin C intake from food and supplements is considered, there is a modest association (34600). However, most clinical trials show that supplemental vitamin C, alone or along with other antioxidants, does not reduce the risk of colorectal cancer development, colorectal cancer or adenoma recurrence, or colorectal cancer-related mortality (34580,34581,34594,90097,90089,92903).
• Fetal and premature infant mortality. Oral vitamin C does not seem to prevent neonatal death. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking vitamin C alone or with other supplements does not reduce the risk of neonatal death (83472,96707).
• Fractures. Oral vitamin C does not seem to improve fracture healing. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg daily for 50 days following an acute distal radial fracture does not improve physical function, symptoms, or healing rates when compared with placebo (90411).
• Helicobacter pylori. Oral vitamin C does not seem to improve eradication of H. pylori. Details: Most clinical research shows that treatment with vitamin C, alone or in combination with vitamin E, does not improve the eradication rate of H. pylori when taken with a standard eradication regimen when compared with the eradication regimen alone (83476,90094).
• Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy. Oral vitamin C does not seem to improve neuropathy in these patients. Details: In a meta-analysis of five studies in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A, taking vitamin C 1-4 grams orally daily for 1 year did not improve neuropathy when compared with placebo (99084). Continuing vitamin C 4 grams daily for 2 years also does not improve neuropathy in these patients (90419).
• Interferon-related retinopathy. Oral vitamin C does not seem to improve retinopathy associated with interferon therapy. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving interferon therapy shows that taking vitamin C 600 daily orally does not seem to reduce the risk of retinopathy from interferon therapy when compared with control (10355).
• Leukemia. Oral vitamin C does not seem to reduce the risk of leukemia or mortality from leukemia. Details: A large clinical trial in men aged at least 50 years shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg daily, alone or along with vitamin E 400 IU daily, for up to 10 years does not reduce the risk of developing leukemia or leukemia-related deaths when compared with placebo (90097).
• Low birth weight. Oral vitamin C does not seem to reduce the risk of infants being born with a low birth weight. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that maternal use of oral vitamin C alone or with other supplements does not reduce the risk of giving birth to infants with low birth weight when compared with control (83450,83472).
• Lung cancer. Oral vitamin C does not seem to reduce the risk of lung cancer. Details: Two meta-analyses of clinical research suggest that taking vitamin C, alone or in combination with vitamin E, does not reduce the incidence of lung cancer or lung cancer-related mortality (34528,34632). Also, a clinical study in females shows that taking supplemental vitamin C 500 mg daily, with or without vitamin E and beta carotene, is associated with an INCREASED risk of lung cancer when compared with placebo (34580). However, another large epidemiological cancer screening trial with a mean follow-up of over 12 years suggests that moderate dietary intake of vitamin C around 500 mg daily is protective against lung cancer, but higher doses of vitamin C might increase the risk of lung cancer (112096).
• Melanoma. Oral vitamin C does not seem to reduce the risk of melanoma. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg daily, alone or along with vitamin E 400 IU daily, for up to 10 years does not reduce the risk of developing melanoma or melanoma-related deaths when compared with placebo in men aged at least 50 years (90097).
• Miscarriage. Oral vitamin C does not seem to reduce the risk of miscarriage. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin C alone or with other supplements does not reduce the risk of miscarriage when compared with control (94820).
• Overall mortality. Oral vitamin C does not reduce overall mortality. Details: Although population research suggests that higher dietary intake and higher plasma vitamin C levels are associated with a reduced risk of mortality from all causes (3910,109779), vitamin C supplementation does not seem to affect overall mortality. Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking vitamin C supplements does not reduce overall mortality when compared with control (34622,111641). Clinical studies of vitamin C used in combination with vitamin E, beta carotene, and/or selenium and zinc, also show no benefit for overall mortality (9817,14109).
• Pancreatic cancer. Oral vitamin C does not seem to prevent pancreatic cancer. However, it is unclear if intravenous vitamin C is beneficial for treatment of pancreatic cancer. Details: Observational research has found that increased dietary vitamin C intake is associated with up to a 30% reduced risk of pancreatic cancer (99083,99086). However, clinical research shows that supplemental vitamin C 500 mg daily does not reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer in females (34580). Also, taking vitamin C in combination with beta-carotene plus vitamin E does not reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer (12185,34581). While research suggests oral vitamin C may not prevent pancreatic cancer, intravenous vitamin C is being explored in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. A small, open-label clinical study in adults with stage IV pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma shows that administration of intravenous vitamin C 75 grams three times weekly throughout each cycle of chemotherapy increases median overall survival and progression free survival by approximately 8 months and 2 months, respectively, when compared with chemotherapy alone (115499). The validity of these results is limited by potential overestimation of treatment effects, influenced by small sample size, differences in chemotherapy doses, and early study termination.
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral vitamin C does not seem to prevent pre-eclampsia. Details: Despite some early positive research in high-risk pregnancies, the majority of meta-analyses and clinical studies show that taking vitamin C alone or with vitamin E or other supplements does not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia when compared with control. There is even some concern that vitamin C supplementation may increase the risk of gestational hypertension (3236,83450,83472,83474,96707).
• Preterm labor. Oral vitamin C does not seem to prevent preterm labor. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking vitamin C alone or with other supplements does not reduce the risk of preterm labor when compared with control (83450,83472,96707).
• Prostate cancer. Oral vitamin C does not seem to prevent prostate cancer. However, it is unclear if intravenous vitamin C is beneficial for the treatment of prostate cancer. Details: A large-scale clinical study (The SU.VI.MAX study) shows that a combination of vitamin C 120 mg, vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) 30 mg, beta-carotene 6 mg, selenium 100 mcg, and zinc 20 mg, taken daily for an average of 8 years, does not reduce the risk of prostate cancer overall. However, it might reduce the risk of prostate cancer in those who have normal PSA levels. It does not seem to be beneficial for reducing the risk of prostate cancer in patients with PSA levels above 3 mcg/L (14135). Another large scale study (Physician's Health Study II) shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg daily for an average of 8 years does not significantly reduce the risk of prostate cancer when compared with placebo (16708). Similarly, results from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial seem to show that supplemental or dietary intake of vitamin C does not reduce the risk of prostate cancer when compared to individuals not taking vitamin C (14124). While research suggests oral vitamin C may not prevent prostate cancer, intravenous vitamin C is being explored in the treatment of prostate cancer. A small clinical study in adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer shows that administration of intravenous vitamin C 1 gram/kg twice weekly in combination with docetaxel for up to 24 weeks does not reduce prostate-specific antigen (PSA) by 50% or more when compared with docetaxel alone (115611). This study may have been underpowered to show a difference between groups.
• Radiation dermatitis. Topical vitamin C does not seem to prevent radiation dermatitis in cancer patients. Details: A small clinical study shows that applying a 10% vitamin C solution does not appear to protect from radiation dermatitis when applied to the scalps of patients treated with radiation for intracranial tumors (789).
• Small for gestational age (SGA). Oral vitamin C does not seem to reduce SGA. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking vitamin C alone or with other supplements does not reduce the risk of small for gestational age birth when compared with control (83450,83472).
• Stillbirth. Oral vitamin C does not seem to prevent stillbirth. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that maternal use of vitamin C alone or with other supplements does not reduce the risk of stillbirth when compared with control (83472,96707).

LIKELY INEFFECTIVE

• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Oral vitamin C, even at high doses, does not seem to speed recovery from COVID-19 in non-hospitalized patients. Most studies show that oral or intravenous vitamin C given to patients hospitalized with COVID-19 does not improve organ function or survival, but the evidence is conflicting. It is unclear whether vitamin C is beneficial for long COVID. Details: A clinical study in adult outpatients with confirmed COVID-19 shows that taking oral vitamin C (ascorbic acid) 8000 mg in 2-3 divided doses daily, alone or with zinc gluconate 50 mg daily, for 10 days does not reduce symptom severity when compared with standard care (104450). The study was terminated prior to complete enrollment due to futility and apparent lack of effect from vitamin C and/or zinc supplementation. Limitations of this study include a lack of placebo control and blinding. Additionally, this study has been criticized for methodologic concerns (106624). Another small clinical trial in adult outpatients with confirmed COVID-19 shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg daily for 14 days does not improve symptoms or quality of life when compared with placebo (109462). Vitamin C has also been evaluated in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. A very large analysis of two multinational clinical studies in critical and non-critical adults hospitalized with COVID-19 shows that administering intravenous vitamin C 50 mg/kg every 6 hours for 96 hours does not improve organ support-free days or survival and has a high probability of futility and worsened outcomes when compared with placebo (113666). Individual prospective and retrospective studies in critically ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in various countries have found that administering vitamin C, either enterally as 500-1000 mg daily or intravenously as 8-24 grams daily or 50 mg/kg daily, does not significantly reduce in-hospital or short-term mortality, hospital length of stay, or end-organ failure when compared with control groups receiving standard care alone. Additionally, all but one study found no change in the need for mechanical ventilation (105458,105465,106937,106938,108075,108079,108081). However, a meta-analysis and some small individual studies have found that vitamin C is modestly beneficial for patients hospitalized with COVID-19. A meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials and 9 observational studies in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 shows that receiving oral or intravenous vitamin C daily reduces the odds of in-hospital mortality by 41% when compared with control. When only clinical trials were considered, the odds of in-hospital mortality were decreased by 56%; however, this reduction was only identified in studies using vitamin C 10 grams daily or less. Conversely, supplementation with vitamin C increased the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay by nearly 2 days and did not impact length of hospital stay or reduce the need for mechanical ventilation, liver injury, or cardiac injury (109955). Similarly, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical studies in primarily hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 shows that vitamin C administered orally or intravenously decreases the risk of all-cause mortality by 16% when compared with control (114488). Additionally, a small study found a small improvement in survival when compared with standard care; however, the overall survival rate in this study was low (108075). Another clinical study in patients hospitalized in Turkey with COVID-19 shows that adding high-dose intravenous sodium ascorbate 50 mg/kg to a treatment regimen of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and zinc may improve recovery time, with 57% and 39% of patients achieving total recovery at day 15 in the vitamin C and control groups, respectively (108071). However, the validity of this trial is limited due to unclear reporting. Vitamin C has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients in patients with long COVID. Preliminary clinical research in adults with long COVID and persistent fatigue shows that taking a specific combination product containing vitamin C 500 mg and L-arginine 1.66 grams (Bioarginina C, Farmacetici Damor) for 28 days increases 6-minute walk test distance by 10% and reduces self-reported fatigue when compared with placebo (110390). However, it is unclear whether these effects are due to vitamin C, L-arginine, or the combination.
• Sepsis. Intravenous vitamin C, alone or in combination with thiamine and/or hydrocortisone, does not prevent organ failure, reduce intensive care or hospital length of stay, or reduce mortality in sepsis or septic shock. Details: Observational research suggests that patients with septic shock are more likely to have low plasma levels of vitamin C (100317). However, three randomized clinical trials in patients with sepsis or septic shock show no benefit with intravenous vitamin C, with or without thiamine, for improving organ function and preventing organ failure when compared with control treatment (102130,104027,114489). A small clinical study in patients with septic shock shows that intravenous vitamin C 50 or 150 mg/kg daily for 4 days does not improve organ dysfunction or failure rates, duration of hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, or mortality rate when compared with placebo (114489). Another clinical study in patients with septic shock shows that administering an intravenous bolus of vitamin C 1000 mg followed by a continuous infusion of 250 mg/hour for 96 hours, starting within 24 hours of vasopressor initiation, does not improve 28-day or ICU mortality when compared with placebo. A subgroup analysis shows that the addition of corticosteroids does not affect outcomes in either group (108078). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. Also, a larger clinical trial in adults with sepsis receiving vasopressor therapy in the ICU shows that intravenous administration of vitamin C 50 mg/kg every 6 hours for up to 4 days increases the risk of death or persistent organ dysfunction at day 28 by 14% to 21% when compared with placebo. There were no differences in mortality at 6 months (109459,111643). Vitamin C has also been frequently studied in patients with sepsis and septic shock in a specific combination regimen (HAT therapy) which includes intravenous vitamin C 1.5-2 grams with hydrocortisone 50 mg every 6 hours and thiamine 200 mg every 12 hours. While some retrospective research has found HAT therapy to be beneficial in sepsis (100315,102980), high quality, prospective clinical research has not confirmed these findings (105447,106620,109956). Several meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and small clinical studies in patients with sepsis or septic shock show that intravenous vitamin C, either alone, as a component of HAT therapy, or in combination with thiamine, does not reduce short- or long-term mortality, ICU or hospital length of stay, kidney injury, or duration of mechanical ventilation, but modestly improves duration of vasopressor use and procalcitonin clearance, when compared with placebo or standard care. These analyses also show mixed results with respect to improvement in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores within 72 hours (105447,106620,106935,108073,109460,111298,111300,111301,111642,112479). Most studies included in the analyses administered HAT therapy for 2-10 days and compared it with normal saline control or with hydrocortisone alone (102129,102998,104027,104028,104032,105446). Although some subgroup analyses suggests that intravenous vitamin C alone in patients with sepsis may improve short-term mortality (106620,111298), other meta-analyses have not shown this benefit in subgroup analyses (111300). In addition, meta-analyses have identified significant publication bias (111298,111300). Long-term follow up from a study in patients with sepsis-induced respiratory and/or cardiovascular dysfunction shows that receiving HAT therapy does not improve cognitive, psychological, or functional status after 6 months and, for some domains, HAT therapy was worse when compared with placebo (111299). Studies evaluating intravenous vitamin C, either alone, as a component of HAT therapy, or in combination with thiamine, in mixed critically ill populations have also shown mixed findings. Four meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and observational studies show that intravenous vitamin C does not have a significant effect on the length of hospital stay, mortality at 1 month, ICU mortality, use of invasive ventilation, use of renal replacement therapy, organ function, or incidence of kidney injury when compared with placebo or standard care. The meta-analyses reach conflicting conclusions on whether intravenous vitamin C reduces the risk of in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and the duration of ICU stay. When only data from low risk-of-bias clinical trials are considered, the effects of intravenous vitamin C on mortality at any point are no longer significant (106933,106934,109957,113663). However, a subgroup analysis in one of these analyses suggests that intravenous vitamin C as monotherapy, or in doses of at least 10 grams daily, may improve overall mortality (106934). Vitamin C also does not appear to benefit complications from sepsis, such as vasoplegic shock. A small clinical study in adults in the ICU with vasoplegic shock mostly secondary to sepsis and requiring moderate vasopressor support shows that administering intravenous vitamin C as sodium ascorbate 1.5 grams every 6 hours for 5 days or until cessation of vasoactive therapy does not reduce the duration of vasopressors, vasopressor dose, hospital or ICU length of stay, or mortality outcomes when compared with placebo (112475).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Atrophic acne scars. It is unclear if applying topical vitamin C after microblading improves atrophic acne scars. Details: A clinical study in adults with mild to severe atrophic acne scarring shows that applying a serum containing vitamin C 17% to the face after a once-monthly home microblade treatment for 4 months improves the appearance of acne scars at month 5 when compared with baseline (108086). Although this study enrolled a control group that used topical insulin in place of vitamin C, no between-group statistical comparisons were conducted, limiting the validity of this study.
• Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). It is unclear if dietary vitamin C or oral vitamin C taken in combination with other ingredients prevents AMD. Details: An umbrella review of meta-analyses shows that increased dietary intake of vitamin C is associated with 21% higher odds of developing AMD (112095). A population study suggests that vitamin C intake is associated with increased odds of developing age-related maculopathy (9823). However, other population studies have found no association between dietary or supplemental vitamin C intake and the risk of developing AMD (14007,14257). When taken in combination with other ingredients, most clinical and population research shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg along with other antioxidants such as vitamin E 400 IU, beta-carotene 15 mg, and/or elemental zinc 80 mg reduces the risk of visual acuity loss by 23% to 27%, progression to advanced AMD at 5 years by 25% to 32%, and AMD overall (7303,7304,11326,14257,90069). The antioxidant plus zinc combination seems to reduce the risk of progression to advanced AMD in these patients more than taking the antioxidants without zinc (7303,90069). More evidence is needed to determine what role, if any, vitamin C intake has on the risk of developing AMD.
• Aging skin. Topical vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in females aged 30-65 years shows that applying a specific liquid (Antioxidant and Collagen Booster Serum, Max Biocare Pty Ltd.) containing vitamin C 20%, red raspberry leaf cell culture extract 0.0005%, and vitamin E 1% to the face nightly for 8 weeks, in addition to regular facial skin products, improves skin color, elasticity, radiance, smoothness, and appearance of wrinkles when compared with regular facial skin products alone (102355).
• Albuminuria. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking vitamin C 1250 mg plus vitamin E 680 IU daily for 4 weeks can reduce the excretion of albumin by about 19% when compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (10434).
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial in patients with hay fever. Details: Epidemiological research has found that higher vitamin C plasma levels are not associated with a decreased risk of allergic rhinitis (15200). However, clinical research shows that some forms of vitamin C might help. In one small clinical study, intranasal vitamin C administered three times daily for 2 weeks reduces nasal secretions, nasal blockage, and edema in up to 74% of patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (15201). Another small clinical study in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis shows that taking a single oral dose of vitamin C 2 grams reduces bronchial responsiveness to histamine at one hour after ingestion (15202). However, in another small study in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis taking vitamin C orally in doses up to 4 grams daily for 3 days does not appear to suppress cutaneous or nasal response to histamine when compared to placebo (15203).
• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if dietary vitamin C helps to prevent this condition. Details: Most epidemiological research has found that dietary intake of vitamin C is associated with a 17% reduced risk of developing Alzheimer disease (4636,9824,10131,13165,90082).
• Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease). It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to prevent ALS. Details: Observational research has found that increased dietary or supplemental intake of vitamin C is not associated with risk of developing ALS (90412).
• Anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin C for anthracycline-induced cardiac toxicity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin C for this condition.
• Aspirin-associated gastric damage. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to prevent gastric damage caused by aspirin. Details: Some clinical research shows that vitamin C 480 mg might prevent gastric damage associated with taking aspirin 400 mg by decreasing blood loss and preventing decreased gastric blood flow (10357). However, a small clinical study in healthy patients shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg as ascorbic acid with aspirin 600 mg actually increases gastrointestinal permeability to a greater extent than either ingredient taken alone (98781).
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral vitamin C improves athletic performance. Details: Although some small preliminary clinical studies suggest that vitamin C might improve certain biomarkers during exercise (82922), a meta-analysis of small clinical trials in older and younger adults shows that taking vitamin C 500-1000 mg daily, with or without vitamin E, does not improve endurance, lean mass, or muscle strength when compared with placebo (102973). A more recent, small clinical study in recreationally trained males shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg and vitamin E (as alpha-tocopherol) 235 mg daily for 10 weeks while participating in a resistance training program does not improve measures of muscle strength when compared with placebo (109959).
• Atopic disease. It is unclear if dietary vitamin C helps to prevent atopic disease. Details: Population research has found that higher intake of vitamin C is not associated with a reduced risk of eczema, wheeze, IgE-mediated food allergy, or allergic sensitization (90098).
• Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Small clinical studies suggest that high-dose oral vitamin C may not improve symptoms in patients with ADHD. Details: Some research suggests that taking megadose vitamins, including vitamin C, does not improve ADHD symptoms (9957,9958,9959). However, other preliminary clinical research shows that taking 25 mg of vitamin C in combination with flaxseed oil providing alpha-linolenic acid 200 mg twice daily might improve measures of attention, impulsivity, restlessness, and self-control in children with ADHD when compared with baseline (14443). It is not clear if these effects are due to vitamin C, flaxseed oil, or the combination.
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial in patients with autism spectrum disorder. Details: One small clinical study shows that taking vitamin C 8 grams per 70 kg daily for 10 weeks modestly reduces autism symptom severity in school children when compared with placebo (83604).
• Bleeding. It is unclear if intravenous vitamin C can reduce bleeding after total abdominal hysterectomy. Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy shows that administration of intravenous vitamin C 1 gram the night before surgery and 1 gram during surgery reduces postoperative hemorrhage volume by around 40 mL when compared with placebo (109465).
• Brain tumor. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to prevent brain tumors. Details: Population research has found that vitamin C intake is associated with a 14% reduced risk of glioma. This risk reduction was more prevalent in America compared to other geographic locations (98782).
• Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to prevent breast cancer, its recurrence, or breast cancer-related mortality. Details: Some epidemiological research has found that dietary vitamin C is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (1444,10823,10824). However, other epidemiological research has found no association with dietary or supplemental vitamin C (10825,10826,108080). One cohort study found no association between breast cancer risk and total, dietary, or supplemental vitamin C, regardless of dose, treatment duration, or formulation (single ingredient or combination product). Additionally, hormone and menopausal status did not appear to impact risk. Vitamin C intake might be associated with a reduced risk in individuals with a family history of breast cancer in first-degree relatives (108080). In patients with breast cancer, supplemental or dietary intake of vitamin C might be associated with a reduced risk of mortality. A meta-analysis of results from population research shows that vitamin C supplementation following breast cancer diagnosis is associated with a 15% lower risk of breast cancer-related mortality when compared with no supplementation (90416). A large, observational study in patients with breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy has found that vitamin C supplementation does not reduce the risk of breast cancer recurrence over a period of 5 years when compared with no supplementation. Although the vitamin C group had notably less aggressive tumor types, recurrence-free survival was similar in both vitamin C and control groups (108082). The validity of these findings is limited due to unknown doses of vitamin C and the inclusion of various breast cancer subtypes.
• Burns. Small studies suggest that intravenous vitamin C may modestly improve symptoms in patients with severe burns. Details: A small clinical study in patients with severe burns shows that administering vitamin C intravenously (IV) 66 mg/kg hourly over 24 hours, as part of fluid resuscitation using lactated ringer solution, reduces wound edema and the volume of fluid needed when compared with fluid resuscitation alone (83145). A retrospective review of adults hospitalized with severe burns has found that those who receive a continuous IV infusion of at least 10 grams of vitamin C within 2 days of admission have an in-hospital mortality rate of 46%, compared with 58% for those who do not receive vitamin C (102128).
• Cancer. It is unclear if oral or intravenous vitamin C helps to prevent cancer or cancer-related mortality. Details: Some population research has found that DIETARY intake of vitamin C is linked with a lower risk of cancer and cancer-related mortality (3910,5878,10819,109779). However, clinical research shows that taking vitamin C SUPPLEMENTS does not reduce the risk for cancer (10819,14109,34580,90097). In people with cancer, although some clinical research has shown that taking high-dose vitamin C supplements can improve survival rates (9809,96704), other clinical research has not shown this benefit (4842,4843). In 2003, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that it would allow a qualified health claim stating that some scientific evidence suggests that antioxidant vitamins, such as vitamin C, may reduce the risk of certain forms of cancer. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence supporting this claim (102334). Preliminary clinical research has also evaluated vitamin C supplements in patients with cancer. High-dose oral vitamin C, 10 grams daily, in patients with advanced cancer does not seem to improve survival or decrease disease progression (4842,4843,106617). However, preliminary clinical research suggests high doses of vitamin C, given intravenously, might have a beneficial effect on some outcomes, including survival rate in some patients with cancer (9809,96704,106617). However, there is no benefit to other patients studied in the case reports and this has not been tested in well-designed clinical trials (9809,96704).
• Cardiac arrest. It is unclear if intravenous vitamin C is beneficial for patients after cardiac arrest. Details: A small clinical study conducted in Slovenia in adult survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest shows that administering intravenous vitamin C 1.5 grams every 12 hours for 8 consecutive doses, with the first dose administered within 6 hours of resuscitation, in addition to standard care protects against arrhythmias and reduces the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay when compared with placebo and standard care. However, intravenous vitamin C does not appear to protect against neurological or myocardial injury, reduce the need for mechanical ventilation, reduce the duration of hospital stay, or increase survival when compared with placebo (113667).
• Carpal tunnel syndrome. Vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A clinical study in adults with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome shows that taking a combination product containing vitamins C, E, B1, B2, B6, and B12, alpha-lipoic acid, acetyl-L-carnitine, phosphatidylserine, and turmeric twice daily for 60 days reduces symptom severity and pain but does not improve measures of hand and wrist function when compared with control (111702). The validity of these effects is limited by a lack of blinding. The study may also be inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. Additionally, it is unclear if the effects are due to vitamin C, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Cervical cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to prevent cervical cancer. Details: Observational research has found that higher vitamin C intake is associated with a 33% to 42% reduced odds of cervical neoplasm. Increasing vitamin C intake by 50 mg daily is associated with an 8% reduced odds of cervical neoplasm (34609,98771).
• Child growth. Some clinical research in pregnant smokers suggests that taking vitamin C during pregnancy may improve pulmonary function in the offspring from birth to 6 years of age. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 data sets from one large clinical study in pregnant adults who smoke at least one cigarette daily shows that taking supplemental vitamin C 500 mg daily during pregnancy reduces lower airway resistance and improves lung capacity of the offspring at 0, 3, 12, and 60 months of age, but does not improve airway obstruction, when compared with control (113670). Additionally, one of the clinical studies included the meta-analysis shows that taking vitamin C during pregnancy lowers the occurrence of wheezing in offspring at 4-6 years of age (114496,114497).
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there is interest in using oral vitamin C for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin C for this condition.
• Colistin-induced nephrotoxicity. It is unclear if intravenous vitamin C helps to prevent nephrotoxicity from colistin. Details: A small clinical study shows that intravenous administration of vitamin C 2 grams every 12 hours along with colistin for around 9-10 days does not prevent nephrotoxicity when compared with colistin therapy alone (99839). However, this study was limited by a lack of statistical power to detect differences between the study groups.
• Contrast induced nephropathy. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Details: Some clinical research shows that taking vitamin C before and after coronary angiography reduces the risk of developing CIN by 33% to 55% when compared with placebo in patients with renal dysfunction (12234,90421). However, other clinical evidence published since 2012 suggests that vitamin C given orally and/or intravenously before and after angiography does not reduce the risk of CIN compared with control in high-risk patients with chronic renal insufficiency or diabetes (91232,91236,90410,90425). Reasons for the discrepancies are not entirely clear. However, it is possible that the lack of significant benefit from vitamin C in the latter studies results from the fact that incidences of CIN have become less common than in the past due to avoidance of dehydration, use of smaller catheters, and use of contrast agents with reduced nephrotoxicity (90429).
• Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. It is unclear if intravenous vitamin C helps to improve patient outcomes after CABG surgery. Details: A small clinical study shows that giving vitamin C 5 grams intravenously (IV) before anesthesia induction and 5 grams in the cardioplegia solution used during surgery shortens the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) by about 8 hours (102127). However, some limited research suggests that IV vitamin C does not resolve cardiac surgery complications. A small clinical study in patients with vasoplegia after receiving CABG and other cardiac surgeries shows that receiving IV vitamin C 1.5 grams every 6 hours after being admitted to the ICU does not improve vasoplegia when compared with control (102981).
• Delirium. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Observational research in adults with septic shock has found that receiving intravenous thiamine 400 mg daily with vitamin C 6 grams daily, both in divided doses, is not associated with reduced delirium when compared with control (103001).
• Dental plaque. It is unclear if vitamin C in a chewing gum helps to reduce dental plaque formation. Details: A small clinical study in patients with calculus shows that chewing 10 pieces of gum, each containing 60 mg of vitamin C, daily for 3 months reduces the formation of dental calculus, visible plaque, and the number of bleeding sites when compared not chewing gum (83303). The validity of this finding is limited by a lack of placebo group.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of depression. Details: A small clinical study in children and adolescents shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg orally twice daily in combination with fluoxetine 10-20 mg daily for 6 months reduces most symptoms of major depressive disorder when compared with taking fluoxetine alone (90404). However, a small clinical study in adults shows that taking vitamin C up to 1000 mg daily for 2 months does not improve the response rate or decrease symptoms of depression in adults also taking citalopram when compared with citalopram alone (96708). Reasons for these conflicting results may relate to the age of the patients, study duration, or differences in antidepressant medication being taken. One clinical guideline also provisionally recommends against the use of oral vitamin C to treat patients with depression based on low-quality evidence (110318). Some research has also evaluated vitamin C intake for the prevention of depression. A secondary analysis of pre- and peri-menopausal adults enrolled in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) program suggests that vitamin C intake is inversely associated with depressive symptoms. This association persisted regardless of age, race, physical activity, body mass index, antidepressant use or menopausal status (108083). The validity of these findings is limited due to the secondary nature of this study; additionally, follow-up time is unclear.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral vitamin C prevents diabetes. Some low-quality research suggests that vitamin C might improve glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Details: Population research has not found a link between dietary vitamin C and the risk of developing type 2 diabetes (14004). However, low certainty clinical research has found some benefit of taking vitamin C supplements for glycemic control. Two meta-analyses of several small, heterogeneous clinical studies in patients with type 2 diabetes show that taking vitamin C 200-3000 mg daily for 2-48 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose by approximately 11 mg/dL (112478) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by an average of 0.5% when compared with placebo, standard treatment, or no treatment (105461,112478). Subgroup analyses suggest that durations of supplementation longer than 12 weeks show greater glycemic benefit, and although one meta-analysis suggests there is no dose-response relationship (105461), another meta-analysis suggests that doses of vitamin C 1000 mg and higher are most beneficial for improving glycemic indices (112478). Some research has evaluated the effects of vitamin C supplementation on the lipid profile in patients with diabetes, with mixed findings. One meta-analysis of 17 small clinical studies shows that taking vitamin C 200-3000 mg daily for 2 to 48 weeks improves levels of triglycerides and total cholesterol, but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Subgroup analysis suggests that study durations of at least 12 weeks show greater benefit (106621). However, two other meta-analyses in patients with diabetes, one of 16 small heterogenous clinical studies and one of 11 small clinical studies, show no clinically important improvement in lipid levels after vitamin C supplementation (105461,105464).
• Dry mouth. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with vitamin E; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancer shows that taking vitamin E 100 IU and vitamin C 500 mg twice daily for an average of 3 months improves dry mouth when compared to baseline (99080). The validity of these results is limited by the lack of comparison with a control group.
• Endometrial cancer. Increased dietary vitamin C has been linked to reduced risk of endometrial cancer. Details: Population research has found that intake of vitamin C from dietary sources is associated with a slightly decreased risk of endometrial cancer when compared with control. However, this benefit is not observed when results from a prospective cohort study are assessed (34578).
• Endometriosis. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with vitamin E; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with endometriosis and pelvic pain shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg and vitamin E 800 IU daily for 8 weeks improves dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain scores when compared with placebo. Vitamin C and vitamin E supplementation also reduces some biochemical markers of oxidative stress when compared with placebo (106622). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 4 other, mostly small clinical studies in patients with endometriosis shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg and vitamin E 800-1200 IU daily for 6-8 weeks reduces chronic pelvic pain and improves dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia when compared with placebo (114491).
• Endoscopy-associated adverse effects. It is unclear if a topical vitamin C spray reduces mucosal irritation in patients undergoing Lugol chromoendoscopy. Details: A small clinical trial in patients receiving a Lugol chromoendoscopy shows that spraying a vitamin C 2% solution after the application of the Lugol iodine 2% solution reduces the severity of mucosal irritation, heartburn, and pain when compared with using a normal saline spray after the Lugol iodine 2% solution (104030).
• Esophageal cancer. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin C is associated with reduced odds of esophageal adenocarcinoma. A 50 gram increase in dietary vitamin C intake is associated with a 13% reduced odds of esophageal cancer (34551,98770). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking a vitamin C supplement in combination with beta-carotene and vitamin E does not reduce the risk of esophageal cancer (34581).
• Exercise-induced asthma. Small clinical studies suggest that oral vitamin C may modestly improve symptoms in patients with exercise-induced asthma. Details: A meta-analysis of the available clinical research shows that vitamin C supplementation might reduce exercise-induced breathlessness when compared with placebo or control. However, the available research is of poor quality, and no clear conclusions can be drawn regarding its benefits for exercise-induced asthma (90409).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial in exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A small clinical study in healthy females shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg before moderate intensity cycling does not prevent muscle damage when compared with placebo (99837). Another small clinical study in endurance-trained runners shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg and vitamin E (as alpha-tocopherol) 235 mg 2 hours prior to an exercise protocol does not reduce delayed onset muscle soreness or improve other markers of exercise-induced muscle damage when compared with placebo (109961).
• Gallbladder disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin C reduces the risk of gallbladder disease. Details: Cross-sectional epidemiological evidence has found that vitamin C supplementation and increased vitamin C serum levels are associated with a decreased risk of developing gallbladder disease in females, but not males (5877).
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if dietary or supplemental vitamin C reduces the risk of gastric cancer. Details: Most population research has not found an association between DIETARY intake of vitamin C and gastric cancer risk (9194,10822,10819,90083). Also, clinical research shows that taking vitamin C supplements in combination with other antioxidants does not reduce the risk of gastric cancer or precancerous gastric lesions (14447,34581,90085). However, some research suggests that it might be associated with a reduced risk for specific forms of gastric cancer (9838,90083). One clinical study shows that taking vitamin C orally 500 mg daily for 6 months after eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection decreases the incidence of precancerous changes in stomach tissue when compared with no treatment (10359). Also, other clinical research shows that taking vitamin C orally 1 gram daily helps promote the regression of precancerous gastric lesions in people at high risk for gastric cancer (2579). In 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that it would allow a qualified health claim stating that vitamin C supplements may reduce the risk of gastric cancer. However, the FDA has concluded that it is highly uncertain that vitamin C supplements actually reduce the risk of gastric cancer (102332).
• Gastritis. There is limited evidence on the oral use of vitamin C in omeprazole-induced corpus gastritis. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking vitamin C orally 1200 mg daily along with omeprazole decreases corpus gastritis associated with omeprazole therapy in patients with H. pylori infection (10360).
• Gout. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to prevent or manage gout. Details: Population research in men has found that taking vitamin C 500-1500 mg daily from the diet and/or supplements is associated with up to a 34% reduced risk of gout when compared with less than 250 mg daily (16755). Also, men who ingest over 500 mg of vitamin C daily from the diet and supplements have serum uric acid levels that are slightly lower than men who consume less than 90 mg daily (16820). However, taking supplemental vitamin C 500 mg daily for 8 weeks does not seem to lower serum uric acid levels in patients who already have gout (90423).
• Hearing loss. There is limited evidence on the intravenous use of vitamin C in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. It is unclear if dietary vitamin C intake can affect the risk of hearing loss. Details: A small clinical study in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss shows that receiving intravenous high-dose vitamin C 200 mg/kg daily in combination with steroid therapy for 10 days, followed by oral vitamin C 2000 mg daily for 30 days, increases recovery rate two-fold and modestly improves hearing threshold levels when compared with receiving steroid therapy only (90417). In addition, population research in females has found that high dietary intake of vitamin C is associated with a 22% increased risk of developing self-reported hearing loss over a 22-year period when compared with low intake (109807).
• Heart transplant complications. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial shows that a combination of vitamin C 500 mg and vitamin E 400 IU, taken twice daily for 1 year starting within the first 2 years after cardiac transplant, reduced the progression of vasculopathy as measured by intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) when compared with placebo. This suggests that the combination may help slow the progression of CAV (82826).
• Hepatitis C. It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial in patients with hepatitis C. Details: A small clinical study in patients with confirmed hepatitis C shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg daily with conventional therapy (sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir) for 4 weeks improves serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, and albumin when compared with conventional therapy alone (109463).
• HIV/AIDS. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small, low-quality study in men with HIV shows that taking vitamin C 250 mg daily in combination with vitamin A, beta-carotene, vitamin E, selenium, and coenzyme Q10 does not improve viral load, although it seems to improve markers of oxidative stress when compared to baseline. However, a 1000 mg dose of vitamin C, as well as higher doses of the other antioxidants, do not seem to provide any additional effect (9830).
• HIV transmission. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A clinical study in HIV-positive mothers shows that taking vitamin B, vitamin C, and vitamin E daily during pregnancy and while breast-feeding for 20 weeks seems to reduce child mortality and HIV transmission through breast milk when compared with taking vitamin A (9801).
• Hyperphosphatemia. Intravenous vitamin C might be beneficial for reducing phosphate levels in patients with end-stage renal disease. Details: A small clinical study in hemodialysis patients with elevated phosphorus levels suggests that administering vitamin C 500 mg intravenously three times weekly for 8 weeks reduces phosphorus levels about seven-fold when compared with placebo (90414).
• Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, shows that taking a combination of vitamin C 250 mg every other day, vitamin D 50,000 IU daily, and vitamin E 200 IU daily for 12 weeks improves some, but not all, measures of lung function and reduces markers of inflammation and oxidative stress when compared to baseline (109464). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of placebo control group.
• Infertility. It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial in anovulatory females. Details: A very small clinical study suggests that taking vitamin C 400-1000 mg daily might improve fertility, resulting in ovulation and pregnancy in some anovulatory females, when compared to baseline (14018). The validity of these findings is limited by the small study size and lack of a comparator group. However, a very large observational study suggests that there is no association between dietary vitamin C intake and in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes including good oocyte quality, embryo transfer success rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and successful term pregnancy rates in subfertile couples who are candidates for IVF (112097).
• Male infertility. It is unclear if oral or intravenous vitamin C is beneficial in males with infertility. Details: A meta-analysis of three small, low-quality clinical trials in males with infertility shows that taking vitamin C up to 1000 mg daily for up to 12 weeks can improve sperm count, motility, and vitality, but does not seem to increase semen volume or sperm concentration, when compared with control (109461). It is unclear if vitamin C can increase pregnancy rates, as these studies did not assess this outcome. A retrospective study in males with or without varicocele-related infertility has found that taking a specific combination product containing vitamin C 90 mg, zinc 10 mg, L-carnitine fumarate 1725 mg, acetyl-L-carnitine 500 mg, coenzyme Q10 20 mg, folic acid 0.2 mg, selenium 0.05 mg, and vitamin B12 0.015 mg (Proxeed Plus, Sigma-Tau) orally twice daily for 6 months improves sperm count, sperm concentration, and sperm motility when compared with baseline. Improvement in semen parameters were greatest in subjects with more severe varicoceles. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group (111296).
• Mastalgia. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with mastalgia shows that taking a combination of vitamin C 100 mg, vitamin B12, and gamma-linolenic acid daily for 12 weeks does not improve the proportion of patients with minimal or no pain when compared with placebo (111059).
• Melasma. It is unclear if topical vitamin C is beneficial in patients with melasma. Details: A small clinical study in patients with bilateral symmetrically distributed facial melasma shows that applying 0.5 mL of vitamin C (Cosmotech, Alpha Medical Cosmotech) following dermapen microneedling every 2 weeks for 6 weeks is similarly effective to tranexamic acid for improving melasma severity and pigmented, but not vascular, findings on dermoscopic examination (106939). Additionally, a small clinical study in adults with melasma shows that applying 1 to 2 mL of 20% vitamin C solution following dermapen microneedling every 2 weeks for 8 weeks does not improve the degree of pigmentation when compared with topical metformin but does improve the degree of pigmentation when compared to baseline (115610).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial in patients with NAFLD. Details: A clinical study in patients with NAFLD shows that taking vitamin C 250 mg, 1000 mg, or 2000 mg daily for 12 weeks improves some biochemical markers of liver health and glucose metabolism when compared with baseline. However, the improvement from baseline was similar between groups (106942).
• Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research suggests vitamin C in combination with vitamin E might improve hepatic fibrosis in patients with NASH. However, it does not seem to decrease liver inflammation (14005).
• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is unclear if oral vitamin C reduces the risk of developing diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Details: In one population study, higher dietary or supplemental intake of vitamin C was associated with a reduced risk of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, when compared with lower intake in postmenopausal adults (90945).
• Oral cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin C reduces the risk of developing oral cancer. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin C is associated with a reduced risk of oral cancer (10821). However, clinical research has not shown benefit with oral vitamin C supplements. A small clinical trial in Japanese adults with oral leukoplakia shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg and beta-carotene 10 mg daily for 12 months does not reduce the development of oral cancer over 5 years when compared with vitamin C 50 mg daily (91384).
• Oral leukoplakia. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in Japanese adults with oral leukoplakia shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg and beta-carotene 10 mg daily for 12 months does not improve leukoplakia symptoms or reduce the development of oral cancer over 5 years when compared with vitamin C 50 mg daily (91384).
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if dietary vitamin C reduces the risk of developing osteoarthritis. Details: Observational research has found that increased vitamin C from dietary sources is associated with a reduced risk of cartilage loss and disease progression in people with osteoarthritis (5881).
• Osteoporosis. It is unclear if dietary vitamin C improves bone density or reduces fracture risk in patients at risk for osteoporosis. Details: Some cross-sectional observational research in postmenopausal patients without a history of smoking or estrogen use has found that higher serum vitamin C levels are associated with lower bone mineral density (9828). However, other observational research in a larger population of adults at risk for osteoporosis has found that higher dietary vitamin C intake is not associated with fracture risk (104415).
• Ovarian cancer. Dietary vitamin C might not affect the risk of ovarian cancer. Details: Epidemiological research has found that dietary vitamin C intake is not linked with ovarian cancer risk (9193,102977).
• Pancreatitis. It is unclear if intravenous vitamin C is beneficial in patients with acute pancreatitis. Details: A small meta-analysis of clinical studies in patients with acute pancreatitis shows that intravenous vitamin C does not improve the odds of developing organ failure when compared with placebo or no intervention. Intravenous vitamin C seems to reduce hospital stay, but not in-hospital mortality (106941).
• Parkinson disease. Dietary vitamin C might not affect the risk of developing this condition. Details: Observational research has found that moderate or high dietary intake of vitamin C is not associated with a reduced risk of Parkinson disease (83316).
• Periodontitis. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. It is also unclear if dietary vitamin C reduces the risk of periodontitis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with moderate or advanced periodontitis shows that taking a supplement containing vitamin C 100 mg, alpha-lipoic acid, coenzyme Q10, cranberry extract, grapeseed extract, selenium, vitamin E, and zinc twice daily for 8 weeks in addition to standard nonsurgical therapy does not improve periodontal indices including bleeding on probing, gingival recession, plaque index, or inflammation, among others, when compared with placebo (111708). It is unclear if these effects are due to vitamin C, other ingredients, or the combination. There is also interest in whether dietary vitamin C intake impacts the risk of periodontitis. Observational research in US adults has found that individuals with dietary intake of vitamin C in the third quartile, but not the second or fourth quartiles, have lower odds of periodontitis when compared with vitamin C intake in the lowest quartile. Furthermore, the investigators identified a non-linear relationship between vitamin C intake and periodontitis risk, suggesting that individuals with intakes either much lower or much higher than 158 mg daily are at increased risk of developing periodontitis (109958).
• Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). It is unclear if dietary vitamin C helps to reduce the risk of developing PAD. Details: In females, epidemiological evidence has found that dietary intake of vitamin C of 142 mg daily or greater is associated with a 36% reduced risk of PAD when compared with lower intake levels of less than 80 mg daily (10130).
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to improve physical performance and muscle strength in older people. Details: Population research has found that higher intake of dietary vitamin C is associated with improved physical performance and muscle strength in elderly people (14006). In contrast, a small clinical study in elderly men undergoing strength training shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg and vitamin E 258IU daily for 12 weeks does not increase strength, and might even attenuate increases in muscle mass, when compared with strength training alone (96701).
• Pneumonia. It is unclear if oral or intravenous vitamin C helps to prevent or treat pneumonia. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies in adults with community-acquired pneumonia shows that oral or intravenous vitamin C does not reduce overall mortality, hospital or intensive care unit length of stay, or the risk of mechanical ventilation when compared with control (114490). The interpretation of these results is limited by significant heterogeneity of the included studies. An earlier meta-analysis of two small, low-quality clinical studies in children shows that vitamin C does not seem to reduce the risk of pneumonia when compared with a control (104033).
• Postoperative recovery. It is unclear if oral or intravenous vitamin C improves postoperative recovery. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that oral or intravenous vitamin C can shorten the duration of hospitalization after cardiac surgery when compared with control (91233,96703). However, other research shows no decrease in intensive care unit (ICU) or hospital stay with vitamin C supplementation (96705), while another clinical study in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation shows that intravenous vitamin C administered during surgery and 48 hours after surgery reduces ICU stay and re-admission rates, wound infection, and hospital mortality, but not length of hospital stay, when compared with control (114492). A meta-analysis of 37 clinical trials in adults undergoing low- to high-risk noncardiac surgery (i.e., orthopedic, abdominal, gynecologic, or kidney transplantation), shows that receiving perioperative vitamin C, either orally or intravenously, does not improve duration of hospitalization or overall mortality when compared with control (108087).
• Postoperative pulmonary complications. It is unclear if intravenous vitamin C improves postoperative pulmonary complications. Details: A large, single-blind clinical study in patients with recent cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation shows that parenteral administration of vitamin C 50 mg/kg intraoperatively and 50 mg/kg every 6 hours for the next 48 hours, followed by oral vitamin C 2000 mg daily until 1-week post-discharge, reduces the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) by 22% and improves PPC severity scores when compared with control. Specifically, vitamin C reduces the incidence of pneumothorax, pleural effusion, pneumonia, and re-intubation and may ameliorate lung damage as suggested by higher Horowitz index when compared with control (114492). A small clinical trial in patients undergoing low-risk cardiac surgery shows that receiving intravenous vitamin C 1 gram 10 minutes after anesthesia might slightly reduce the rate of postoperative pulmonary complications when compared with receiving a saline injection (104034).
• Postoperative swelling. It is unclear if vitamin C reduces postoperative swelling after dental surgery. Details: A small observational study in adults undergoing surgery for wisdom tooth extraction shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg three times daily for 7 days in addition to standard treatment reduces swelling 7 days after surgery when compared with control. However, vitamin C does not seem to reduce swelling 3 days after surgery when compared with control, suggesting that longer durations are needed for anti-inflammatory effects (113664).
• Premature rupture of membranes (PROM). Oral vitamin C seems to reduce the risk of PROM in some patients; however, the addition of oral vitamin E seems to negate any benefit. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin C alone decreases the risk of both term and preterm PROM by 45% and 34%, respectively, when compared with placebo or control (96707). Another meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin C during pregnancy decreases the risk of PROM by 43% and preterm PROM by 33%, but does not decrease the risk of term PROM, when compared with a control. While vitamin C was studied in doses of 100, 500, and 1000 mg daily, the decreased risk of PROM was only observed in studies of 100 mg daily (114493). A moderate-sized clinical study in patients with a history of PROM shows that taking vitamin C 100 mg daily, starting at 14 weeks' gestation, increases the gestational age at recurrent PROM by around 1 week and increases the gestational age at birth by around 1.3 weeks when compared with placebo (109960). Additionally, a meta-analysis of observational studies suggests that vitamin C levels in the blood tend to be lower in patients with PROM, particularly preterm PROM (114493). Taking vitamin C in combination with vitamin E, however, does not seem to reduce the risk of term or preterm PROM; some research suggests that it might even increase the risk of non-preterm PROM (83472,96707). However, other research shows that taking vitamin C 1000 mg plus vitamin E 400 IU daily, beginning at 24 to 34 weeks gestation and continuing until delivery, may help increase the latency period until delivery by 5 days and increase gestational age at delivery by almost 1 week when compared with placebo in patients with preterm PROM (90078).
• Pressure ulcers. It is unclear if oral vitamin C, when used alone or in combination with other ingredients, can improve the healing of pressure ulcers. Details: A small clinical study in institutionalized patients with pressure ulcers shows that taking vitamin C 500 mg twice daily for 12 weeks does not improve wound closure or increase healing rates when compared with vitamin C 10 mg twice daily (83617). Oral vitamin C has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients for the treatment of grade II-IV pressure ulcers. Two small clinical studies in hospitalized patients with pressure ulcers shows that administering an oral nutritional supplement enriched with vitamin C, L-arginine, and zinc improves ulcer healing when compared with a standard diet (31953,87173). Also, clinical research in patients living in long-term care facilities shows that taking an oral nutritional supplement enriched in protein, vitamin C, L-arginine, and zinc daily for 9 weeks reduces ulcer area and decreases oozing when compared to baseline (32045). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Radiation proctopathy. Oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with vitamin E; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chronic radiation proctitis shows that vitamin C 500 mg plus vitamin E 400 IU three times daily might improve symptoms when compared with baseline (9825). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Renal cell carcinoma. It is unclear if increased dietary intake of vitamin C helps to reduce the risk of renal cell carcinoma. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of vitamin C is associated with a 12% reduced risk of renal cell carcinoma (98779).
• Respiratory tract infections. It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial for preventing respiratory tract infections or reducing the duration of these infections. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in children and adults shows that, when compared with placebo, oral vitamin C supplementation reduces the average number of symptomatic days per individual, but does not reduce the average symptom days per respiratory episode. Also, vitamin C intake does not reduce the incidence or severity of respiratory disease or improve recovery in hospitalized patients with respiratory tract infections (108077). The validity of this trial is limited by the high heterogeneity of included studies, which evaluated various vitamin C regimens, ranging from 100 mg to 8 grams daily, as preventive therapy or as an adjuvant to active treatment. A clinical study in children aged 3-10 years shows that taking vitamin C 50 mg in combination with a specific product (Lab4) containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis daily for 6 months reduces the incidence of cough and sore throat by 16% and 20%, respectively, when compared with placebo. However, it did not improve total symptoms, nasal congestion, nasal discharge, or sneezing. Also, aside from a 33% reduction in the average number of days with a sore throat, daily supplementation does not reduce the duration of individual symptoms or total symptoms (106943). It is unclear if these effects are due to vitamin C, the probiotics, or the combination.
• Restless legs syndrome (RLS). It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to reduce symptoms of stress. Details: A small clinical study in hemodialysis patients with RLS shows that taking vitamin C 200 mg daily, alone or in combination with vitamin E 400 mg, for 8 weeks reduces the severity of RLS when compared with placebo (90093). More research is needed to determine if vitamin C is beneficial in treating RLS that is not associated with hemodialysis.
• Sunburn. Topical and oral vitamin C has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking vitamin C orally in combination with vitamin E seems to prevent ultraviolet (UV) radiation-induced erythema (sunburn) (4715,4716). Vitamin C in combination with high dose oral RRR-alpha-tocopherol (natural vitamin E) seems to protect against skin inflammation after exposure to UV radiation (4715). Also, applying topical vitamin C in combination with topical vitamin E and melatonin seems to provide modest photoprotective effects when used prior to UV exposure. However, it has no effect when used during or after UV exposure (4713,4714).
• Stress. It is unclear if oral vitamin C helps to reduce symptoms of stress. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults shows that taking vitamin C 3000 mg daily for 14 days modestly reduces blood pressure and subjective stress response to psychological stress when compared with placebo (10353).
• Stroke. Observational research has found that although taking vitamin C supplements does not seem to be beneficial, eating more vitamin C-rich food is linked with reduced risk of stroke. Details: Lower plasma levels of vitamin C have been associated with increased stroke risk (90408). Additionally, population research has found that higher dietary intake of vitamin C is associated with a 8% to 19% reduction in stroke risk when compared to lower intake (90408,109779). This reduction appears to be dose-dependent, with each 100 mg/day increase in dietary vitamin C intake associated with about a 17% reduction (90408). However, taking vitamin C supplements has not been found to be associated with reduced stroke risk (1449,90408).
• Tetanus. It is unclear if intravenous vitamin C helps to reduce symptoms of tetanus. Details: A low quality clinical trial in children and young adults with tetanus shows that intravenous vitamin C 1 gram daily along with conventional treatment reduces fatality when compared to control (21539).
• Tooth extraction. It is unclear if oral vitamin C is beneficial for reducing pain or improving healing after tooth extraction. Details: A small clinical study in healthy patients aged 14-41 years who are undergoing bilateral premolar extraction shows that taking vitamin C 200 mg three times daily, beginning immediately after extraction and continued for 10 days, improves pain on days 1-3, and may reduce mesio-distal wound size between days 1 and 7, when compared with placebo, but not when compared with vitamin C 500 mg three times daily. A dose of 500 mg three times daily did not improve pain scores or extraction wound healing when compared with placebo (108084). The validity of this trial is limited by the short duration of treatment; additionally, this study did not report baseline vitamin C levels.
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Although there is interest in using oral vitamin C for UTIs, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin C for this condition.
• Vascular dementia. It is unclear if oral vitamin C reduces the risk of vascular dementia. Details: Population research has found that supplemental intake of vitamin C and vitamin E is associated with a reduced risk of vascular dementia in Japanese-American men (4636). However, when cases in which dementia was diagnosed prior to the study are excluded from data analysis, intake of vitamin C and vitamin E is not associated with a reduced risk of vascular dementia in these patients (9824).
• Wound healing. It is unclear if oral vitamin C improves the healing of chronic foot ulcers. It is also unclear if intravenous vitamin C improves healing of surgical wounds after total abdominal hysterectomy. Details: A very small clinical study in adults with chronic foot ulcers shows that taking slow-release vitamin C 500 mg daily for 8 weeks seems to result in a median of 100% ulcer healing, compared with a median of 14% ulcer healing in patients taking glucosamine 1000 mg daily (105456). This finding is limited due to the small and heterogeneous patient population, which included patients with diabetes, vascular disease, and/or vitamin C deficiency. Another small clinical study in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy shows that administration of intravenous vitamin C 1 gram the night before surgery and 1 gram during surgery does not reduce the rate of surgical site infection or wound dehiscence when compared with placebo (109465). However, this study may not have been adequately powered to detect differences between groups. More evidence is needed to rate vitamin C for these uses.

(Read more about VITAMIN C)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Bacopa has been used safely in clinical trials at a dose of up to 600 mg daily for up to 12 weeks (10058,10059,17946,97605).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Clinical research suggests bacopa extract might be safe to use at a dose of 225 mg daily for up to 6 months or 320 mg daily for up to 14 weeks in children aged 6-14 years (33304,97603,109625).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about BACOPA)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally, parenterally, or rectally and appropriately. Caffeine has Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912,98806). Caffeine is also an FDA-approved product and a component of several over-the-counter and prescription products (4912,11832). According to a review by Health Canada, and a subsequent large meta-analysis conducted in the US, doses of caffeine up to 400 mg daily are not associated with significant adverse cardiovascular, bone, behavioral, or reproductive effects in healthy adults (11733,98806). The US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee states that there is strong and consistent evidence that consumption of caffeine 400 mg daily is not associated with increased risk of major chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease or cancer, in healthy adults (98806). This amount of caffeine is similar to the amount of caffeine found in approximately 4 cups of coffee. Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine from caffeine-containing natural ingredients such as coffee or green tea does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally, long-term or in high doses (91063). Chronic use, especially in large amounts, can produce tolerance, habituation, psychological dependence, and other adverse effects (3719). Acute use of high doses, typically above 400 mg daily, has been associated with significant adverse effects such as tachyarrhythmia and sleep disturbances (11832). Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine from caffeine-containing natural ingredients such as coffee or green tea does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

LIKELY UNSAFE ...when used orally in very high doses. The fatal acute oral dose of caffeine is estimated to be 10-14 grams (150-200 mg/kg). Serious toxicity can occur at lower doses depending on variables in caffeine sensitivity such as smoking, age, or prior caffeine use (11832,95700,97454,104573). Caffeine products sold to consumers in highly concentrated or pure formulations are considered to a serious health concern because these products have a risk of being used in very high doses. Concentrated liquid caffeine can contain about 2 grams of caffeine in a half cup. Powdered pure caffeine can contain about 3.2 grams of caffeine in one teaspoon. Powdered pure caffeine can be fatal in adults when used in doses of 2 tablespoons or less. As of 2018, these products are considered by the FDA to be unlawful when sold to consumers in bulk quantities (95700).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally or intravenously and appropriately in neonates under the guidance of a healthcare professional (6371,38340,38344,91084,91087,97452). ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods and beverages in children and adolescents (4912,11833,36555). Daily intake of caffeine in doses of less than 2.5 mg/kg daily are not associated with significant adverse effects in children and adolescents (11733,98806). Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine from caffeine-containing natural ingredients such as coffee or green tea does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Intakes of caffeine should be monitored during pregnancy. Caffeine crosses the human placenta, but is not considered a teratogen (38048,38252,91032). Fetal blood and tissue levels are similar to maternal concentrations (4260). The use of caffeine during pregnancy is controversial; however, moderate consumption has not been associated with clinically important adverse fetal effects (2708,2709,2710,2711,9606,16014,16015,98806,108814). In some studies consuming amounts over 200 mg daily is associated with a significantly increased risk of miscarriage (16014,37960). This increased risk seems to occur in those with genotypes that confer a slow rate of caffeine metabolism (98806). According to a review by Health Canada, and a subsequent large meta-analysis conducted in the US, up to 300 mg daily can be consumed during pregnancy without an increased risk of spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, preterm birth, fetal growth retardation, or congenital malformations (11733,98806). However, observational research in a Norwegian cohort found that caffeine consumption is associated with a 16% increased odds of the baby being born small for gestational age when compared with no consumption (100369,103707). The same Norwegian cohort found that low to moderate caffeine consumption during pregnancy is not associated with changes in neurodevelopment in children up to 8 years of age (103699). Advise patients to keep caffeine consumption below 300 mg daily during pregnancy. This is similar to the amount of caffeine in about 3 cups of coffee or tea.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in amounts over 300 mg daily. Caffeine crosses the placenta, producing fetal blood concentrations similar to maternal levels (4260,98806). Consumption of caffeine in amounts over 300 mg daily is associated with a significantly increased risk of miscarriage in some studies (16014,98806). Advise patients to keep caffeine consumption below 300 mg daily during pregnancy. This is similar to the amount of caffeine in about 3 cups of coffee or tea. Additionally, high doses of caffeine throughout pregnancy have resulted in symptoms of caffeine withdrawal in newborn infants (9891). High doses of caffeine have also been associated with spontaneous abortion, premature delivery, and low birth weight (2709,2711,91033,91048,95949). In a cohort of mother/infant pairs with a median maternal plasma caffeine level of 168.5 ng/mL (range 29.5-650.5 ng/mL) during pregnancy, birth weights and lengths were lower in the 4th quartile of caffeine intake compared with the 1st. By age 7, heights and weights were lower by 1.5 cm and 1.1 kg respectively. In another cohort of mother/infant pairs with higher maternal pregnancy plasma caffeine levels, median 625.5 ng/mL (range 86.2 to 1994.7 ng/mL), heights at age 8 were 2.2 cm lower, but there was no difference in weights (109846).

LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Caffeine intake should be closely monitored while breast-feeding. During lactation, breast milk concentrations of caffeine are thought to be approximately 50% of serum concentrations and caffeine peaks in breastmilk approximately 1-2 hours after consumption (23590).

LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in large amounts. Caffeine is excreted slowly in infants and may accumulate. Caffeine can cause sleep disturbances, irritability, and increased bowel activity in breast-fed infants exposed to caffeine (2708,6026).

(Read more about CAFFEINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately (13161,14306,14307,14308,15655,15752,17187,92271,92274,103247)(103250,108898). However, cocoa naturally contains caffeine, and caffeine may be unsafe when used orally in doses of more than 400 mg daily (11733,98806). While most cocoa products contain only small amounts of caffeine (about 2-35 mg per serving) (2708,3900), one cup of unsweetened, dry cocoa powder can contain up to 198 mg of caffeine (100515). To be on the safe side, cocoa should be used in amounts that provide less than 400 mg of caffeine daily. Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine naturally found in ingredients such as cocoa does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product. Cocoa and dark chocolate products worldwide also contain heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. In the US, one ounce (approximately 28 grams) of most commercially available dark chocolate products tested contained levels of lead and/or cadmium above the maximum allowable dose level for California, with cadmium levels generally increasing with the percentage of cocoa (109847,109848,109849). Advise patients to consume cocoa in moderation. ...when used topically. Cocoa butter is used extensively as a base for ointments and suppositories and is generally considered safe (11).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when dark chocolate is used orally. Cocoa and dark chocolate products worldwide contain heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. In the US, one ounce (approximately 28 grams) of most commercially available dark chocolate products tested contained levels of lead and/or cadmium above the maximum allowable dose level for California, with cadmium levels generally increasing with the percentage of cocoa (109847,109848,109849). Children are at increased risk of adverse effects from intake of lead and/or cadmium. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of other chocolate-based products that typically contain smaller quantities of cocoa.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally in moderate amounts. However, due to the caffeine content of cocoa preparations, intake should be closely monitored during pregnancy to ensure moderate consumption. Fetal blood concentrations of caffeine approximate maternal concentrations (4260). Some research has found that intrauterine exposure to even modest amounts of caffeine, based on maternal blood levels during the first trimester, is associated with a shorter stature in children ages 4-8 years (109846). While many cocoa products contain only small amounts of caffeine (about 2-35 mg per serving) (2708,3900), unsweetened, dry cocoa powder can contain up to 198 mg of caffeine per cup (100515). According to a review by Health Canada, and a subsequent large meta-analysis conducted in the US, doses of up to 300 mg daily can be consumed during pregnancy without an increased risk of spontaneous abortion, still birth, preterm birth, fetal growth retardation, or congenital malformations (11733,98806). To be on the safe side, cocoa should be used in amounts that provide less than 300 mg of caffeine daily. Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine found in ingredients such as cocoa, which naturally contains caffeine, does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in large amounts. Caffeine found in cocoa crosses the placenta producing fetal blood concentrations similar to maternal levels (4260). Consumption of caffeine in amounts over 300 mg daily is associated with a significantly increased risk of miscarriage in some studies (16014,98806). Additionally, high intake of caffeine during pregnancy have been associated with premature delivery, low birth weight, and loss of the fetus (6). While many cocoa products contain only small amounts of caffeine (about 2-35 mg per serving) (2708,3900), unsweetened, dry cocoa powder can contain up to 198 mg of caffeine per cup (100515). To be on the safe side, cocoa should be used in amounts that provide less than 300 mg of caffeine daily (2708). Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine found in ingredients such as cocoa, which naturally contains caffeine, does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product. Cocoa and dark chocolate products worldwide also contain heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. In the US, one ounce (approximately 28 grams) of most commercially available dark chocolate products tested contained levels of lead and/or cadmium above the maximum allowable dose level for California, with cadmium levels generally increasing with the percentage of cocoa (109847,109848,109849). Large doses or excessive intake of cocoa should be avoided during pregnancy.

LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used in moderate amounts or in amounts commonly found in foods. Due to the caffeine content of cocoa preparations, intake should be closely monitored while breastfeeding. During lactation, breast milk concentrations of caffeine are thought to be approximately 50% of serum concentrations. Moderate consumption of cocoa would likely result in very small amounts of caffeine exposure to a nursing infant (6). Keep in mind that only the amount of ADDED caffeine must be stated on product labels. The amount of caffeine found in ingredients such as cocoa, which naturally contains caffeine, does not need to be provided. This can make it difficult to determine the total amount of caffeine in a given product.

LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in large amounts. Consumption of excess chocolate (16 oz per day) may cause irritability and increased bowel activity in the infant (6026). Cocoa and dark chocolate products worldwide also contain heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. In the US, one ounce (approximately 28 grams) of most commercially available dark chocolate products tested contained levels of lead and/or cadmium above the maximum allowable dose level for California, with cadmium levels generally increasing with the percentage of cocoa (109847,109848,109849). Large doses or excessive intake of cocoa should be avoided during lactation.

(Read more about COCOA)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Creatine supplementation appears to be safe when used at loading doses of up to 25 grams daily or 0.3 grams/kg daily for up to 14 days in healthy adults (1367,2100,2101,3996,4569,10064,15354,15520,46570,46587)(46673,46688,46719,46753,46801,103278,103279,108336). Creatine supplementation also appears to be safe when used at maintenance doses of 4-5 grams daily for up to 18 months (2101,4578,15353,15354,15520,46587,46673,46690,46753,46838,102164,103278,108336).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately, long-term. Creatine supplementation has been safely used at doses of up to 10 grams daily for up to 5 years in some preliminary clinical research (1367,3996). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of creatine when used topically.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Creatine supplementation appears to be safe when used in appropriate doses in infants and children. Creatine 3-5 grams daily for 2-6 months has been safely used in children 5-18 years of age (6182,46596,46739,46841). Creatine 2 grams daily for 6 months has been safely used in children 2-5 years of age (46841). Additionally, weight-based dosing of creatine 0.1-0.4 grams/kg daily in infants and children or 4.69 grams/m2 in children weighing over 40 kg has been used safely for up to 6 months (46623,46629,46694,46759,104672).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about CREATINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when prescription products are used orally and appropriately (12033). ...when niacinamide supplements are taken orally in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) set by the Institute of Medicine (IOM). The UL of niacinamide is 30 mg daily for adults 18 years of age and 35 mg daily for adults 19 years and older (6243).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally in doses greater than 30 mg but less than 900 mg daily. The European Food Safety Authority has set the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of niacinamide at 900 mg daily (104937). However, oral niacinamide has been safely used in doses up to 1500 mg daily for 12 weeks in some clinical trials (25561,94188,98940,107709,110502) and up to 1000 mg daily for 12 months in other trials (93362,113559,113560). ...when used topically and appropriately for up to 16 weeks (5940,93360,110497,110498,110501,113681,113683,113684).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Niacinamide has been safely used in children for up to 7 years in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) (4874,9957). The UL of niacinamide for children by age is: 1-3 years, 10 mg daily; 4-8 years, 15 mg daily; 9-13 years, 20 mg daily; 14-18 years, 30 mg daily (6243).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts that do not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for niacinamide. The UL of niacinamide during pregnancy and lactation is 30 mg daily for those 14-18 years of age and 35 mg daily for those 19 years and older (6243). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of larger oral doses of niacinamide or topical niacinamide; avoid using.

(Read more about NIACINAMIDE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in doses up to 100 mEq total potassium daily, not to exceed 200 mEq in a 24-hour period (95010,107989). Oral potassium chloride and potassium citrate are FDA-approved prescription products (95010,107989). Larger doses increase the risk of hyperkalemia (15). ...when administered intravenously (IV) at appropriate infusion rates (95011). Parenteral potassium is an FDA-approved prescription product (15,95011). A tolerable upper intake level (UL) for potassium has not been established; however, potassium levels should be monitored in individuals at increased risk for hyperkalemia, such as those with kidney disease, heart failure, and adrenal insufficiency (100310,107966).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in dietary amounts. A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for healthy individuals (6243,100310).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in dietary amounts of 40-80 mEq daily (15). A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for healthy individuals (100310).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used in amounts found in foods (2030).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when taken orally in doses of up to 1500 mg daily for up to 3 months (71066,71097,91328,91331,95825,95833,98910,100695,105183,109163,109167). Higher doses of 2000-3000 mg daily have been well tolerated when taken for 2-6 months, but are more likely to cause gastrointestinal side effects (91327,98908). ...when used topically for up to 30 days (71064). ...when used as an intranasal spray for up to 4 weeks (97339).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used in amounts found in foods.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used as an intranasal spray for up to 2 months in children 4 years of age and older (91332). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of resveratrol when used by mouth in larger amounts as medicine.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used in amounts found in foods (2030). Resveratrol is found in grape skins, grape juice, wine, and other food sources. However, wine should not be used as a source of resveratrol during pregnancy and lactation.

(Read more about RESVERATROL)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used in amounts found in foods. Typical daily intakes for adults range from 40-400 mg (101471).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts. Taurine 2-4 grams daily in two or three divided doses has been used safely in studies lasting up to 3 months (5248,5271,8217,8221,10454,77147,95612,98337,104165,104167). Higher doses of taurine 6 grams daily have been used safely in studies lasting up to 4 weeks (98336,98337). A risk assessment of orally administered taurine has identified an Observed Safe Level (OSL) of up to 3 grams daily for healthy adults (31996).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used in amounts found in foods.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts. Taurine 2.4-4.8 grams daily in three divided doses has been safely used in children 6-16 years of age for up to 12 weeks (103210).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used in amounts found in foods. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of taurine when used in medicinal amounts during pregnancy and lactation; avoid using.

(Read more about TAURINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Tyrosine has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts, short-term. Tyrosine has been used safely in doses up to 150 mg/kg daily for up to 3 months (7210,7211,7215). ...when used topically and appropriately (6155).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of tyrosine during pregnancy and lactation when used in medicinal amounts. Some pharmacokinetic research shows that taking a single dose of tyrosine 2-10 grams orally can modestly increase levels of free tyrosine in breast milk. However, total levels are not affected, and levels remain within the range found in infant formulas. Therefore, it is not clear if the increase in free tyrosine is a concern (91467).

(Read more about TYROSINE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in doses that do not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 100 mg daily in the form of pyridoxine for adults (15,6243). ...when used parenterally and appropriately. Injectable vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) is an FDA-approved prescription product (15).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in doses of 101-200 mg daily (6243,8558).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in doses at or above 500 mg daily. High doses, especially those exceeding 1000 mg daily or total doses of 1000 grams or more, pose the most risk. However, neuropathy can occur with lower daily or total doses (6243,8195). ...when used intramuscularly in high doses and frequency due to potential for rhabdomyolysis (90795).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in doses that do not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of vitamin B6 in the form of pyridoxine 30 mg daily for children aged 1-3 years, 40 mg daily for 4-8 years, 60 mg daily for 9-13 years, and 80 mg daily for 14-18 years (6243).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in amounts exceeding the recommended dietary allowance (5049,8579,107124,107125,107135).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses, long-term (6243).

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. A special sustained-release product providing vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) 75 mg daily is FDA-approved for use in pregnancy. Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) is also considered a first-line treatment for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (111601). However, it should not be used long-term or without medical supervision and close monitoring. The tolerable upper intake level (UL) refers to vitamin B6 in the form of pyridoxine and is 80 mg daily for those aged 14-18 years and 100 mg daily for 19 years and older (6243).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. There is some concern that high-dose maternal vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) can cause neonatal seizures (4609,6397,8197).

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in doses not exceeding the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of vitamin B6 in the form of pyridoxine 80 mg daily for those aged 14-18 years and 100 mg daily for those 19 years and older. The recommended dietary allowance (RDA) in lactating women is 2 mg daily (6243). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of vitamin B6 when used in higher doses in breast-feeding women.

(Read more about VITAMIN B6)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally, topically, intramuscularly, or intravenously and appropriately. Vitamin C is safe when taken orally in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL). Tell patients not to exceed the UL of 2000 mg daily (1959,4713,4714,4844). ...when used intravenously or intramuscularly and appropriately. Injectable vitamin C is an FDA-approved prescription product (15) and has been used with apparent safety in clinical trials up to 150 mg/kg daily for up to 4 days (114489) and up to 200 mg/kg daily for up to 2 days (114492).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. Doses greater than the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 2000 mg daily can significantly increase the risk of adverse effects such as osmotic diarrhea and gastrointestinal upset (4844).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (4844,10352,14443).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive amounts. Tell patients not to use doses above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 400 mg daily for children ages 1 to 3 years, 650 mg daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1200 mg daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 1800 mg daily for adolescents 14 to 18 years. Higher doses can cause osmotic diarrhea and gastrointestinal upset (4844).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (4844).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. Tell patients over age 19 not to use doses exceeding the UL of 2000 mg daily when pregnant or breast-feeding and for those 14-18 years of age not to use doses exceeding 1800 mg daily when pregnant or breast-feeding. Higher doses can cause osmotic diarrhea and gastrointestinal upset. Large doses of vitamin C during pregnancy can also cause newborn scurvy (4844); avoid using.

(Read more about VITAMIN C)

ANTICHOLINERGIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concurrent use might decrease the effectiveness of both agents.  Details Bacopa seems to inhibit acetylcholinesterase and might increase acetylcholine levels, which could counteract the effects of anticholinergic drugs (17946). Similarly, anticholinergic drugs might counteract the cholinergic effects of bacopa.

CEVIMELINE (Evoxac) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, bacopa might increase the effects and adverse effects of cevimeline.  Details In one case, a 58-year-old female taking cevimeline long-term for Sjogren syndrome experienced hyperhidrosis, malaise, nausea, and tachycardia shortly after taking a single dose of bacopa. Symptoms resolved after two days. Cevimeline is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and CYP3A4, and researchers theorize that bacopa may have inhibited these isoenzymes (109627). However, it is unclear if bacopa causes clinically significant inhibition of either CYP2D6 or CYP3A4.

CHOLINERGIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concurrent use of bacopa with other cholinergic drugs might have additive effects.  Details Bacopa seems to inhibit acetylcholinesterase and might increase acetylcholine levels (17946). Theoretically, this could result in additive cholinergic effects when used with cholinergic drugs.

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, bacopa might increase the levels and adverse effects of CYP1A2 substrates.  Details Research on the effects of bacopa extracts on CYP1A2 enzymes is conflicting. Some in vitro evidence shows that bacopa extract can moderately and non-competitively inhibit CYP1A2, while other in vitro evidence suggests that any effect is unlikely to be clinically significant (97269,97606).

CYTOCHROME P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, bacopa might increase the levels and adverse effects of CYP2C19 substrates.  Details In vitro evidence suggests that bacopa extract can moderately and non-competitively inhibit CYP2C19 enzymes (97606). It is not known whether this is clinically significant.

CYTOCHROME P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, bacopa might increase the levels and adverse effects of CYP2C9 substrates.  Details Research on the effect of bacopa extracts on CYP2C9 enzymes is conflicting. Some in vitro evidence suggests that bacopa extract can moderately and non-competitively inhibit CYP2C9, while other in vitro evidence suggests that any effect is unlikely to be clinically significant (97269,97606).

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, bacopa might increase the levels and adverse effects of CYP3A4 substrates.  Details Research on the effects of bacopa extracts on CYP3A4 enzymes is conflicting. Some in vitro evidence suggests that bacopa extract can moderately and competitively inhibit CYP3A4, while other in vitro evidence suggests that any effect is unlikely to be clinically significant (97269,97606).

THYROID HORMONE Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, bacopa might have additive effects when used with thyroid hormone.  Details Animal research suggests that bacopa increases thyroxine (T4) levels in mice by about 40% (33286).

(Read more about BACOPA)

ADENOSINE (Adenocard) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, caffeine might decrease the vasodilatory effects of adenosine and interfere with its use prior to stress testing.  Details Some evidence shows that caffeine is a competitive inhibitor of adenosine and can reduce the vasodilatory effects of adenosine in humans (38172). However, other research shows that caffeine does not seem to affect supplemental adenosine because high interstitial levels of adenosine overcome the antagonistic effects of caffeine (11771). It is recommended that methylxanthines and methylxanthine-containing products be stopped 24 hours prior to pharmacological stress tests (11770). However, methylxanthines appear more likely to interfere with dipyridamole (Persantine) than adenosine-induced stress testing (11771).

ALCOHOL (Ethanol) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Alcohol reduces caffeine metabolism. Concomitant use of alcohol can increase caffeine serum concentrations and the risk of caffeine adverse effects (6370).

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine may increase the risk of bleeding if used with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.  Details Caffeine is reported to have antiplatelet activity. Theoretically, it might increase the risk of bleeding when used concomitantly with these agents (8028,8029); however, this interaction has not been reported in humans.

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, taking caffeine with antidiabetes drugs might interfere with blood glucose control.  Details Data are conflicting. Reports claim that caffeine might increase or decrease blood sugar (6024,8646,114662).

CARBAMAZEPINE (Tegretol) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of carbamazepine and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that taking caffeine can lower the anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine and can induce seizures when taken in doses above 400 mg/kg (23559,23561). Human research has shown that taking caffeine 300 mg in three divided doses along with carbamazepine 200 mg reduces the bioavailability of carbamazepine by 32% and prolongs the plasma half-life of carbamazepine 2-fold in healthy individuals (23562).

CIMETIDINE (Tagamet) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cimetidine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cimetidine decreases the rate of caffeine clearance by 31% to 42% (11736).

CLOZAPINE (Clozaril) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Caffeine might increase the levels and adverse effects of clozapine and acutely exacerbate psychotic symptoms.  Details Caffeine might increase the effects and toxicity of clozapine. Caffeine doses of 400-1000 mg per day inhibit clozapine metabolism (5051). Clozapine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2). Although researchers speculate that caffeine might inhibit CYP1A2, there is no reliable evidence that caffeine affects CYP1A2. There is also speculation that genetic factors might make some patients more sensitive to an interaction between clozapine and caffeine (13741). In one case report, severe, life-threatening clozapine toxicity and multiorgan system failure occurred in a patient with schizophrenia stabilized on clozapine who consumed caffeine 600 mg daily (108817).

CONTRACEPTIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, contraceptive drugs might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Oral contraceptives decrease the rate of caffeine clearance by 40-65% (2714,11737).

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) INHIBITORS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Caffeine is metabolized by CYP1A2. Theoretically, drugs that inhibit CYP1A2 may decrease the rate of caffeine clearance and increase caffeine levels (5051,11741).

DIPYRIDAMOLE (Persantine) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, caffeine might decrease the vasodilatory effects of dipyridamole and interfere with its use prior to stress testing.  Details Caffeine inhibits dipyridamole-induced vasodilation (11770,11772). It is recommended that methylxanthines and methylxanthine-containing products be stopped 24 hours prior to pharmacological stress tests (11770). Methylxanthines appear more likely to interfere with dipyridamole (Persantine) than adenosine-induced stress testing (11771).

DISULFIRAM (Antabuse) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, disulfiram use might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Disulfiram decreases the rate of caffeine clearance (11840).

DIURETIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, using caffeine with diuretic drugs might increase the risk of hypokalemia.  Details Caffeine, especially in excessive amounts, can reduce potassium levels due to stimulation of the sodium-potassium pump (23579,37905,37953,38003,38034). Diuretics can also cause lower potassium levels.

EPHEDRINE Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk for stimulant adverse effects.  Details Use of ephedrine with caffeine can increase the risk of stimulatory adverse effects. There is evidence that using ephedrine with caffeine might increase the risk of serious life-threatening or debilitating adverse effects such as hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, seizures, and death (1275,6486,10307).

ESTROGENS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, estrogens might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Estrogen inhibits caffeine metabolism (2714,23570).

ETHOSUXIMIDE (Zarontin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of ethosuximide and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that caffeine 92.4 mg/kg can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of ethosuximide (23560). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

FELBAMATE (Felbatol) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of felbamate and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that a high dose of caffeine 161.7 mg/kg can decreases the anticonvulsant activity of felbamate (23563). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

FLUCONAZOLE (Diflucan) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, fluconazole might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Fluconazole decreases caffeine clearance by approximately 25% (11022).

FLUTAMIDE (Eulexin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might increase the levels and adverse effects of flutamide.  Details In vitro evidence suggests that caffeine can inhibit the metabolism of flutamide (23553). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

FLUVOXAMINE (Luvox) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, fluvoxamine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Fluvoxamine reduces caffeine metabolism (6370).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Abrupt caffeine withdrawal might increase the levels and adverse effects of lithium.  Details Caffeine has diuretic activity. When abruptly discontinued, caffeine may alter the clearance of lithium (609). There are two case reports of lithium tremor that worsened upon abrupt coffee withdrawal (610) and 6 case reports of elevated serum lithium levels after reducing or eliminating caffeine intake (114665). In one case, a male with schizoaffective disorder stabilized on lithium had an elevated lithium level after reducing his caffeine intake by 87%. At a later date, he increased his caffeine intake by 6-fold, resulting in a subtherapeutic lithium level and a recurrence of psychiatric symptoms (114665).

METFORMIN (Glucophage) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, metformin might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Animal research suggests that metformin can reduce caffeine metabolism (23571). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

METHOXSALEN (Oxsoralen) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, methoxsalen might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Methoxsalen reduces caffeine metabolism (23572).

MEXILETINE (Mexitil) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, mexiletine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Mexiletine reduces caffeine metabolism (1260,11741).

MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITORS (MAOIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk of a hypertensive crisis.  Details Caffeine has been shown to inhibit monoamine oxidase (MAO) A and B in laboratory studies (37724,37877,37912,38108). Concomitant intake of large amounts of caffeine with MAOIs might precipitate a hypertensive crisis (15). In a case report, a patient that consumed 10-12 cups of caffeinated coffee and took the MAOI tranylcypromine presented with severe hypertension (91086). Hypertension was resolved after the patient switched to drinking decaffeinated coffee.

NICOTINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk of hypertension.  Details Concomitant use of caffeine and nicotine has been shown to have additive cardiovascular effects, including increased heart rate and blood pressure. Blood pressure was increased by 10.8/12.4 mmHg when the agents were used concomitantly (36549).

PENTOBARBITAL (Nembutal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, caffeine might decrease the effects of pentobarbital.  Details Caffeine might negate the hypnotic effects of pentobarbital (13742).

PHENOBARBITAL (Luminal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of phenobarbital and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of phenobarbital (23558,23559,23561). However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

PHENOTHIAZINES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, phenothiazines might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Phenothiazines, including perazine, chlorpromazine, levomepromazine, and thioridazine, can reduce the metabolism of caffeine by inhibiting cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) (23573,23574).

PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, phenylpropanolamine might increase the risk of hypertension, as well as the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Concomitant use of phenylpropanolamine and caffeine might cause an additive increase in blood pressure (11738). Phenylpropanolamine also seems to increase caffeine serum levels (13743).

PHENYTOIN (Dilantin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of phenytoin and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of phenytoin (23559,23561). The effect does not seem to be related to the seizure threshold-lowering effects of caffeine. However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

PIOGLITAZONE (Actos) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might increase the levels and clinical effects of pioglitazone.  Details Animal research suggests that caffeine can modestly increase the maximum concentration, area under the curve, and half-life of pioglitazone, and also reduce its clearance. This increased the antidiabetic effects of pioglitazone (108812). However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, quinolone antibiotics might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Quinolones (also called fluoroquinolones) can decrease caffeine clearance by inhibiting cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) enzyme (606,607,608,23554,23555,23556).

RILUZOLE (Rilutek) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the levels and adverse effects of both caffeine and riluzole.  Details Caffeine and riluzole are both metabolized by cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2), and concomitant use might reduce the metabolism of one or both agents (11739).

STIMULANT DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, concomitant use might increase stimulant adverse effects.  Details Due to the central nervous system (CNS) stimulant effects of caffeine, concomitant use with stimulant drugs can increase the risk of adverse effects (11832).

TERBINAFINE (Lamisil) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, terbinafine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Terbinafine decreases the clearance of intravenous caffeine by 19% (11740).

THEOPHYLLINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, caffeine might increase the levels and adverse effects of theophylline.  Details Large amounts of caffeine might inhibit theophylline metabolism (11741).

TIAGABINE (Gabitril) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might increase the levels and adverse effects of tiagabine.  Details Animal research suggests that chronic caffeine administration can increase the serum concentrations of tiagabine. However, concomitant use does not seem to reduce the antiepileptic effects of tiagabine (23561).

TICLOPIDINE (Ticlid) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, ticlopidine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details In vitro evidence suggests that ticlopidine can inhibit caffeine metabolism (23557). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

VALPROATE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, caffeine might reduce the effects of valproate and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of valproate (23558,23559,23561,37882). However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, verapamil might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Verapamil increases plasma caffeine concentrations by 25% (11741).

(Read more about CAFFEINE)

ACE INHIBITORS (ACEIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking cocoa with ACEIs might increase the risk of adverse effects.  Details Human research shows that dark chocolate can inhibit ACE (42112). Additionally, prolonged angioedema in an elderly patient on an ACE inhibitor was precipitated with intake of diabetic chocolate (42049).

ADENOSINE (Adenocard) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cocoa might decrease the vasodilatory effects of adenosine and interfere with its use prior to stress testing.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine is a competitive inhibitor of adenosine at the cellular level. However, caffeine does not seem to affect supplemental adenosine because high interstitial levels of adenosine overcome the antagonistic effects of caffeine. It is recommended that methylxanthines and methylxanthine-containing products be stopped 24 hours prior to pharmacological stress tests. However, methylxanthines appear more likely to interfere with dipyridamole than adenosine-induced stress testing (11771).

ALCOHOL (Ethanol) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Alcohol reduces caffeine metabolism. Concomitant use of alcohol can increase caffeine serum concentrations and the risk of caffeine adverse effects (6370).

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa may increase the risk of bleeding if used with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.  Details Clinical research shows that intake of cocoa can inhibit platelet adhesion, aggregation, and activity (6085,17076,41928,41948,41957,41958,41995,42014,42070,42145)(111526) and increase aspirin-induced bleeding time (23800). For patients on dual antiplatelet therapy, cocoa may enhance the inhibitory effect of clopidogrel, but not aspirin, on platelet aggregation (111526).

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking cocoa with antihypertensive drugs might increase the risk of hypotension.  Details Clinical research shows that cocoa can modestly decrease blood pressure in hypertensive and normotensive patients (13166,14306,15655,15752,17187,42059,42092,42107,42137,42143)(42169,103249,109446).

BETA-ADRENERGIC AGONISTS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, large amounts of cocoa might increase the cardiac inotropic effects of beta-agonists.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Theoretically, large amounts of caffeine might increase cardiac inotropic effects of beta-agonists (15). A case of atrial fibrillation associated with consumption of large quantities of chocolate in a patient with chronic albuterol inhalation abuse has also been reported (42075).

CIMETIDINE (Tagamet) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the effects and adverse effects of caffeine in cocoa.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Cimetidine decreases caffeine clearance by 30% to 50% (15,506).

CONTRACEPTIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the effects and adverse effects of caffeine found in cocoa.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Oral contraceptives decrease the rate of caffeine clearance by 40% to 65% (2714,11737).

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) INHIBITORS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) (3941,5051,11741,23557,23573,23580,24958,24959,24960,24962), (24964,24965,24967,24968,24969,24971,38081,48603). Theoretically, drugs that inhibit CYP1A2 may decrease the clearance rate of caffeine from cocoa and increase caffeine levels.

DIPYRIDAMOLE (Persantine) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cocoa might decrease the vasodilatory effects of dipyridamole and interfere with its use prior to stress testing.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine may inhibit dipyridamole-induced vasodilation (11770,11772). It is recommended that methylxanthines and methylxanthine-containing products be stopped 24 hours prior to pharmacological stress tests (11770). Methylxanthines appear more likely to interfere with dipyridamole than adenosine-induced stress testing (11771).

DISULFIRAM (Antabuse) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, disulfiram might increase the risk of adverse effects from caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. In human research, disulfiram decreases the rate of caffeine clearance (11840).

DIURETIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, using cocoa with diuretic drugs might increase the risk of hypokalemia.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. In excessive amounts, caffeine can reduce potassium levels due to stimulation of the sodium-potassium pump (23579,37905,37953,38003,38034). Diuretics can also cause lower potassium levels.

EPHEDRINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk for stimulant adverse effects.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. There is evidence that using ephedrine with caffeine might increase the risk of serious life-threatening or debilitating adverse effects such as hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, seizures, and death (1275,6486,10307).

ESTROGENS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, estrogens might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Estrogen inhibits caffeine metabolism (2714).

FLUCONAZOLE (Diflucan) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, fluconazole might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Fluconazole decreases caffeine clearance by approximately 25% (11022).

FLUTAMIDE (Eulexin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa might increase the levels and adverse effects of flutamide.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. In vitro evidence suggests that caffeine can inhibit the metabolism of flutamide (23553).

FLUVOXAMINE (Luvox) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, fluvoxamine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Fluvoxamine reduces caffeine metabolism (6370).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, abrupt cocoa withdrawal might increase the levels and adverse effects of lithium.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. There are two case reports of lithium tremor that worsened upon abrupt coffee withdrawal (609,610).

METHOXSALEN (Oxsoralen) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, methoxsalen might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Methoxsalen can reduce caffeine metabolism (23572).

METMORPHIN (Glucophage) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, metformin might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that metformin can reduce caffeine metabolism (23571).

MEXILETINE (Mexitil) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, mexiletine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Mexiletine can decrease caffeine elimination by 50% (1260,11741). Concomitant use might increase the effects and adverse effects of caffeine in cocoa.

MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITORS (MAOIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk of a hypertensive crisis.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Large amounts of caffeine with MAOIs might precipitate a hypertensive crisis (15).

NICOTINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the risk of hypertension.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Concomitant use of caffeine and nicotine has been shown to have additive cardiovascular effects, including increased heart rate and blood pressure. Blood pressure was increased by 10.8/12.4 mmHg when the agents were used concomitantly (36549).

PENTOBARBITAL (Nembutal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cocoa might decrease the effects of pentobarbital.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine might negate the hypnotic effects of pentobarbital (13742).

PHENOBARBITAL (Luminal) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa might reduce the effects of phenobarbital and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of phenobarbital (23558,23559,23561). The exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

PHENOTHIAZINES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, phenothiazines might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Phenothiazines can reduce the metabolism of caffeine by inhibiting cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) (23573,23574).

PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, phenylpropanolamine might increase the risk of hypertension, as well as the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Concomitant use of phenylpropanolamine and caffeine might cause an additive increase in blood pressure (11738). Phenylpropanolamine also seems to increase caffeine serum levels (13743).

PHENYTOIN (Dilantin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa might reduce the effects of phenytoin and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of phenytoin (23559,23561). The effect does not seem to be related to the seizure threshold-lowering effects of caffeine. However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, quinolone antibiotics might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Quinolones (also referred to as fluoroquinolones) decrease caffeine clearance (606,607,608).

RILUZOLE (Rilutek) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use might increase the levels and adverse effects of both caffeine and riluzole.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Caffeine and riluzole are both metabolized by cytochrome P450 1A2, and concomitant use might reduce metabolism of one or both agents (11739).

STIMULANT DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, concomitant use might increase stimulant adverse effects.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Concomitant use might increase the risk of stimulant adverse effects (11832).

TERBINAFINE (Lamisil) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, terbinafine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Terbinafine decreases the rate of caffeine clearance (11740).

THEOPHYLLINE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, cocoa might increase the levels and adverse effects of theophylline.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Large amounts of caffeine might inhibit theophylline metabolism (11741). Caffeine decreases theophylline clearance 23% to 29% (506).

TIAGABINE (Gabitril) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa tea might increase the levels and adverse effects of tiagabine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that chronic caffeine administration can increase the serum concentrations of tiagabine. However, concomitant use does not seem to reduce the antiepileptic effects of tiagabine (23561).

TICLOPIDINE (Ticlid) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, ticlopidine might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. In vitro evidence suggests that ticlopidine can inhibit caffeine metabolism (23557). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

VALPROATE Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cocoa might reduce the effects of valproate and increase the risk for convulsions.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Animal research suggests that caffeine can decrease the anticonvulsant activity of valproate (23558,23559,23561,37882). However, the exact mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, verapamil might increase the levels and adverse effects of caffeine.  Details Cocoa contains caffeine. Verapamil increases plasma caffeine concentrations by 25% (11741).

(Read more about COCOA)

(Read more about CREATINE)

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, niacinamide may have additive effects when used with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs, especially in patients on hemodialysis.  Details Several cases of thrombocytopenia have been reported for hemodialysis patients treated with niacinamide 1 gram daily. Hemodialysis patients receiving niacinamide had almost a three-fold higher risk of developing thrombocytopenia when compared with those receiving placebo (25563,98940).

CARBAMAZEPINE (Tegretol) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Niacinamide might increase the levels and adverse effects of carbamazepine.  Details Plasma levels of carbamazepine were increased in two children given high-dose niacinamide, 60-80 mg/kg/day. This might be due to inhibition of the cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in carbamazepine metabolism (14506). There is not enough data to determine the clinical significance of this interaction.

PRIMIDONE (Mysoline) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Niacinamide might increase the levels and adverse effects of primidone.  Details Case reports in children suggest niacinamide 60-100 mg/kg/day reduces hepatic metabolism of primidone to phenobarbital, and reduces the overall clearance rate of primidone (14506); however, there is not enough data to determine the clinical significance of this potential interaction.

(Read more about NIACINAMIDE)

ACE INHIBITORS (ACEIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Using ACEIs with high doses of potassium increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details ACEIs block the actions of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and reduce potassium excretion (95628). Concomitant use of these drugs with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15,23207). However, concomitant use of these drugs with moderate dietary potassium intake (about 3775-5200 mg daily) does not increase serum potassium levels (95628).

ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKERS (ARBs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Using ARBs with high doses of potassium increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details ARBs block the actions of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and reduce potassium excretion (95628). Concomitant use of these drugs with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15,23207). However, concomitant use of these drugs with moderate dietary potassium intake (about 3775-5200 mg daily) does not increase serum potassium levels (95628).

POTASSIUM-SPARING DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Concomitant use increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details Using potassium-sparing diuretics with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)