Fat Free Yogurt (Strawberry flavor) by Stonyfield Farm, Inc.

Athletic performance. Oral beet may improve athletic performance associated with aerobic activities. However, it is not clear who is most likely to benefit, for which type of competition it is most useful, or what dose or duration of use is most appropriate. Details: Several small clinical trials, most of which enrolled elite athletes, recreational athletes, and sedentary males, as well as meta-analyses of some of these and other studies, show that beet improves various measures of athletic performance, including ability, muscular endurance, power output, sprinting, and strength (93844,94464,94468,94469,100143,100150,100152,105761,113422). Clinical research also shows that drinking beetroot juice improves the use of oxygen during exercise testing in recreationally-trained athletes, especially with severe exercise testing (94460,94463,94467,100147,105762). Also, in obese adolescents, taking beetroot juice daily for 6 days increases the time to exhaustion from severe exercise, but does not improve moderate exercise (100145). Not all research shows that beet supplementation benefits athletic performance. Another meta-analysis of several small clinical studies, including some of the studies above, shows that taking beetroot does not improve performance in high-intensity or sprint interval training (111159). Additionally, the majority of research in elite athletes does not support the use of beetroot juice to decrease the time needed to complete a task, aid in some sort of graded exercise test, or improve the use of oxygen during exercise testing (94455,94458,94460,94461,94464,94465,94466,94469,94473,100142,100153,105763). The supposed lack of effect of beetroot juice in elite athletes might be related to the natural production of nitrates and nitrites in the body or the increased ability to use oxygen that comes from extensive training (94458,94463). Alternatively, any changes might be very small (<1%) and not identified with statistical comparisons, although even very small changes might be beneficial in competition (94464). The most commonly used doses in all studies, regardless of effect, have included an acute dose of beetroot juice 70-500 mL up to 3 hours prior to exercise (93844,94463,94464,94466,94467,94473,97726,100142,100143,105761)(105762,111159,113422) or chronic dosing of up to 500 mL daily for 3-6 days (94459,94464,94469,100145,100147,100153,111159,113422). Less commonly, beetroot juice 70-140 mL daily, betalain-rich concentrate 100 mg daily, or a beetroot-based nutritional gel 100 grams daily, have been taken for longer dosing schedules of 7-15 days (97720,100144,100148,100152,105763,113422). Benefits in elite athletes, most often related to time trials, are usually limited to studies using chronic dosing of 7-15 days, which is longer than the duration of 6 days used in the majority of studies (94473,97720,100144,100148). Brands of juice used in clinical trials have included Beet It Sport (James White Drinks Ltd.) (94455,94458,94465,100142,100143,100144,100148,105761,105763), Beet It Stamina Shot (James White Drinks Ltd.) (93844), Beet It (James White Drinks Ltd) (94457,94459,94460,94467,94469,97726,100145,100153,105762,111159), and Love Beets Beetroot Juice (Gs Fresh Ltd.) (94461,94462). Although plasma levels have not been analyzed in all studies, the majority of studies suggest that these doses are adequate to increase levels of nitrates or nitrites, which is thought to be essential for increasing athletic potential (93844,94455,94458,94459,94460,94465,94467,94469,94466,94473,97726). The evidence also suggests benefit in both normoxic and hypoxic environments (94465,100148,105763).
Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Drinking beetroot juice 7-8 times over 48 hours after strenuous exercise may reduce exercise-induced muscle soreness, but evidence is conflicting. Details: Some clinical research shows drinking beetroot juice (Love Beets Beetroot Juice, Gs Fresh Ltd.) 125 mL or 250 mL seven times over 48 hours after strenuous box jumps improves muscle soreness when compared with placebo and sodium nitrite (96964,97722). Other small clinical studies show that drinking beetroot juice 50-250 mL as eight separate doses over 48 hours after strenuous exerciseimproves muscle soreness and reduces tissue edema when compared with placebo (94461,113424). However, drinking beetroot juice 250 mL as seven separate doses over 48 hours after running a marathon does not appear to reduce muscle soreness when compared with placebo (94462). A meta-analysis of 4 small studies, mostly in healthy or physically active males, shows that drinking beetroot juice improves the pressure pain threshold, which is a measure of muscle soreness, at 48- and 72-hours post-exercise when compared with a fruit-flavored drink. However, beetroot juice does not improve subjective muscle soreness scores (111160). The validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the beetroot juice regimens among the included studies. Further, these results should not be generalized to elite athletes.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Drinking beetroot juice for up to 14 days may not improve exercise capacity in patients with COPD. Details: A meta-analysis of eight small clinical trials in patients with COPD shows that taking nitrate-rich beetroot juice does not improve most measures of exercise capacity, including the 6-minute walk test, cycling ergometry endurance time, and maximum rate of oxygen consumption (VO2 max), when compared with placebo. Additionally, beetroot juice did not reduce blood pressure or heart rate. However, the analysis did show a significant improvement in scores on the Borg Rating of Perceived Exhaustion scale with beetroot juice over placebo. Nitrate-rich beetroot juice doses ranged from 70-140 mL daily for up to 14 days (104200).

Cognitive function. It is unclear if drinking beetroot juice is beneficial for cognitive function. Details: A small clinical study in adults with overweight or obesity on a calorie-restricted diet shows that drinking 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice daily for 14 days improves the time to complete part B of the trail making test, which is a test of cognitive function, but not part A, when compared with controls (111158). However, the duration and size of this study limits its validity. Further, it is unclear whether any improvement is clinically significant. The effect of acute beet administration on cognitive function has also been studied. A very small clinical study in healthy adults shows that taking beet extract (RedNite, Enovate Biolife) chewable tablets 3 grams 90 minutes prior to neuropsychological testing improves immediate and delayed memory capacity, frontal lobe function, and lexical flexibility but does not improve working memory, information processing speed, or subjective reports of memory performance when compared with placebo (113427).
Coronary heart disease (CHD). It is unclear if oral beetroot extract is beneficial in patients with CHD. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with CHD shows that taking red beetroot extract 500 mg, containing around 25 mg betalains, twice daily for 2 weeks reduces total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 15 mg/dL and reduces triglycerides by 8 mg/dL when compared to baseline. Slight improvements in blood pressure and blood glucose were also reported, but these changes were not clinically significant (103883). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Also, it is unclear whether beetroot can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with CHD.
Dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral beetroot is beneficial in patients with dyslipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in healthy individuals or patients with dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease, or overweight or obesity, shows that consuming beetroot juice or leaves does not improve levels of triglycerides or total, low-density lipoprotein, or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol when compared with controls (111163). However, the validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the enrolled patients and beetroot regimens.
Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice improves recovery from muscle damage after exercise. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 small clinical studies in healthy or physically active individuals, most of which enrolled males only, shows that drinking beetroot juice improves measures of muscle recovery at 72 hours post-exercise when compared with a fruit-flavored drink. However, beetroot juice does not consistently improve recovery at earlier time points post-exercise, nor does it reduce levels of creatine kinase or markers of inflammation (i.e., interleukin-6, interleukin-8, c-reactive protein, or tumor necrosis factor-alpha) (111160). However, the validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the beetroot juice regimens among the included studies, which usually varied from 210-250 mg of nitrate in 7-11 servings over 3-7 days. Further, these results should not be generalized to elite athletes. Another very small clinical study in semi-professional female athletes shows that ingesting beetroot juice 50 mL 8 times over 48 hours after exercise-induced muscle damage enhances the recovery of some functional parameters such as muscle endurance but not others such as flexibility and vertical jump performance when compared with placebo (113424).
Hypertension. Oral beet may slightly reduce blood pressure in healthy individuals, but it is unclear if it is beneficial in patients with hypertension. Details: Meta-analyses of small studies show the potential for a minor reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in healthy adults taking beetroot juice (94470,97718,97728). The average reduction in SBP and DBP with beetroot juice consumption is about 4 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, which is greater than the effect seen with consuming blackcurrant juice or nitrate-depleted beetroot juice. The most benefit is seen when beetroot juice is taken for at least 2 weeks or at doses of 500 mL daily (97728). The effect of acute beet supplementation on blood pressure is conflicting. A small clinical study in healthy adults shows that drinking beet juice (Beet It, James White Company) 140 mL two hours prior to cardiovascular measurements reduces resting SBP by about 4 mmHg but does not improve resting or post-exercise DBP, central blood pressure, or arterial stiffness nor does it improve post-exercise SBP when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis suggests that the reductions in resting SBP were only observed in males, not females (113423). Another small clinical study shows that consuming beet 100 grams baked into bread modestly decreases DBP over a 6-hour period when compared with white bread (97725). It is possible that genetics might play a role in the magnitude of effect seen with beetroot consumption. Adults with a specific gene polymorphism, eNOS Glu298Asp, experienced a greater reduction in DBP after consuming beet-containing bread (97724). Despite positive findings in studies of healthy individuals, research on the use of beetroot juice in patients with hypertension is unclear. A small clinical study in adults with hypertension who were taking antihypertensive medications shows that drinking nitrate-rich beetroot juice (Beet it; James White Drinks Ltd.) 70 mL twice daily for one week does not lower blood pressure when compared with nitrate-depleted beetroot juice (94457). Also, in patients with mild to moderate hypertension, clinical research shows that taking a combination of beetroot powder (Sensient) 300 mg, olive leaf extract 1000 mg, and green coffee bean extract 200 mg daily for 6 weeks does not lower blood pressure when compared with placebo (97723). However, some evidence suggests that at least part of the blood pressure lowering effects of beet might be independent of nitrate (97728). Furthermore, some research suggests that identifying effects on blood pressure might be dependent on the method of measurement, including clinic resting measurements, 24-hour monitoring, or morning/evening home resting measurements (97729).
Hypertriglyceridemia. It is unclear if oral beet is beneficial in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Details: A small clinical study in overweight or obese individuals with dyslipidemia shows that taking freeze-dried beet leaf 2.8 grams daily for 4 weeks in addition to nutritional guidance does not lower triglyceride levels when compared with nutritional guidance alone (100146). Beet has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical trial in patients at risk for heart disease shows that a specific combination of beet and hawthorn berry (Neo40-Daily, Neogenis Labs), taken twice daily for 30 days, can modestly reduce blood triglyceride levels when compared to baseline (18222). It is unclear if these findings are due to beet, hawthorn berry, or the combination.
Liver disease. Although there has been interest in using oral beet for liver disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of beet for this purpose.
Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial for muscle strength. Details: A meta-analysis of 18 clinical studies in healthy males shows that taking beetroot juice or beetroot gel 2-3 hours before exercise improves muscular strength when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis suggests that beetroot-based supplements improve muscular strength in a fatigued but not resting state (113422). A small clinical study in adults with overweight or obesity on a calorie-restricted diet shows that drinking 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice daily for 14 days improves handgrip strength by approximately 18% compared with 4% in controls (111158). However, it is unclear whether any improvement is clinically significant.
Obesity. It is unclear if oral beet leaf or beetroot juice is beneficial for weight loss. Details: A small clinical study in patients with overweight or obesity and dyslipidemia shows that taking freeze-dried beet leaf 2.8 grams daily for 4 weeks in addition to nutritional guidance does not reduce body weight or body mass index (BMI) when compared with nutritional guidance alone (100146). Similarly, a small clinical study in adults with overweight or obesity on a calorie-restricted diet shows that drinking 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice daily for 14 days does not improve weight loss when compared with controls (111158). However, the size and duration of this study may have been inadequate to detect differences between groups.
Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension. Details: A small clinical trial in pregnant patients with hypertension who are at approximately 22-35 weeks gestation shows that taking beetroot juice (James White Drinks Ltd) 70 mL daily for 8 days does not reduce blood pressure when compared with a nitrate-depleted beetroot juice (100151). However, the study was small and designed to investigate the feasibility of using beetroot juice in this population.
Pulmonary hypertension. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking beetroot juice (Beet-It Sport; James White Drinks Ltd) 70 mL twice daily for 7 days does not improve right ventricular systolic function when compared with nitrate-depleted beetroot juice in patients with pulmonary hypertension (100149). However, this study was small and not adequately powered to detect differences between groups.
Raynaud syndrome. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial in patients with Raynaud syndrome. Details: A small clinical study in patients with Raynaud syndrome undergoing cold sensitivity tests shows that drinking beetroot juice (Beet-It, James White Drinks Ltd) 70 mL daily for 13 days, followed by 140 mL prior to testing, does not reduce pain in the hands or feet, but might improve thermal comfort in the feet, when compared to baseline (103884). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. More evidence is needed to rate beet for these uses.

BIFIDOBACTERIUM ANIMALIS SUBSP. LACTIS (Bifidus)

Colic. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis seems to be beneficial for colic. Details: Clinical research in infants with colic shows that taking B. lactis BB-12 (Chr. Hansen, Hoersholm or Bifidolactis Infant, Sofar SpA) drops providing 1 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 3 or 4 weeks modestly reduces the daily number of crying episodes by about 2.5 when compared with placebo. The proportion of infants with at least a 50% reduction in crying time from baseline was 61% to 80%, compared with 22% to 32% of those taking placebo. Use of B. lactis also resulted in increased sleep time, reduced crying duration, and improved physical and emotional functioning of the caregiver. Stool frequency was decreased in one study, but was not changed in the other (107583,107587).
Constipation. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis seems to be beneficial for constipation. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking B. lactis increases bowel movement frequency by about 1.5 stools weekly in adults with functional constipation. Specific strains used include LMG P-21384 as 5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily, Bi-07 as 100 million CFUs daily, DN-173 010 as 12.5 billion CFUs daily, and GCL2505 as 10 billion CFUs daily for 2-4 weeks (95342). Another meta-analysis of clinical research in adults with chronic constipation shows that taking B. lactis modestly increases stool frequency when compared with taking placebo. However, there was no effect of taking B. lactis on treatment success, stool consistency, severity of straining or bloating, or gut transit time. Due to the small number of studies, the effect of B. lactis on other symptoms of constipation is unclear from this analysis (110874). A third meta-analysis shows that two specific strains of B. lactis, HN019 and DN-173 010, have medium to large effects on intestinal transit time in mainly healthy adults (110983). The effect of these strains on intestinal transit time in patients with constipation is unclear from this analysis. Clinical research in patients with low defecation frequency also shows that taking the specific B. lactis strain BB-12 (Chr. Hansen A/S) 1-10 billion CFUs daily for 4 weeks increases the odds of improved defecation frequency by about 1.3-fold when compared with placebo (92264). It is possible that any beneficial effect is limited to patients with more severe constipation. One clinical study in patients with functional constipation shows that taking the specific B. lactis strain HN019, 1 or 10 billion CFUs daily for 4 weeks, has no effect on bowel movements when compared with placebo. However, in a post-hoc analysis of patients with three or less weekly stools, this strain of B. lactis modestly increased bowel movements when compared with placebo (98737). Another clinical study in patients with mild chronic constipation shows that taking B. lactis NCC2818 15 billion CFUs daily for 4 weeks does not affect gut transit time, stool output, or symptoms when compared with placebo (102411). B. lactis has also been examined in combination with other ingredients. One small clinical trial using a specific combination product (ID-HWS1000) containing B. lactis IDCC 4301, Bifidobacterium breve IDCC 4401, Lacticaseibacillus casei IDCC 3451, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum IDCC 3501, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus IDCC 3201, Lactococcus lactis IDCC 2301, xylooligosaccharide, and dietary fiber as nondigestible maltodextrin, oat fiber, and psyllium husk fiber daily for 4 weeks modestly increases stool frequency and improves symptoms of functional constipation in adults when compared with placebo (107517). Another small clinical trial shows that taking yogurt 180 mL providing B. lactis HN019, L. acidophilus NCFM, and polydextrose (Litesse) daily for 2 weeks modestly improves clinical response and reduces transit time when compared with taking a control yogurt. However, there was no effect on the number of daily bowel movements (90275). Other studies have used B. lactis UABla-12, Bl-04, Bi-07, and/or HN019 in combination with Bifidobacterium bifidum UABb-10, Bifidobacterium longum UABl-14, Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1, and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) for 4 weeks (110970) or Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Lpc-37 for 2 weeks (110979). However, there was a general lack of support for symptom improvement from these studies.
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Oral Bifidobacterium lactis seems to be beneficial for reducing symptoms of IBS when used alone. Its benefits when used in combination with other probiotics are unclear. Details: Clinical research in adults with IBS shows that taking B. lactis UABla-12 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 6 weeks modestly reduces the severity of abdominal pain when compared with placebo. Also, 28% of patients responded to treatment by having more than a 30% reduction in pain severity, compared with only 16% of those taking placebo. There were also improvements in abdominal distention, duration of pain, and bowel habits (107581). Additional clinical research in children aged 4-16 years shows that taking B. lactis B19 10 billion CFUs daily for 4 weeks reduces bloating, feelings of abdominal fullness, and difficulty with defecation in 25% to 50% of patients with IBS (95350). Some research has also evaluated B. lactis in combination with other probiotics. Clinical research shows that taking a product (Duolac Care) containing B. lactis, Bifidobacterium breve, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, and Streptococcus thermophilus twice daily for 4 weeks can relieve symptoms in 72% of patients with IBS (95353). Another clinical study in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS shows that taking a specific multi-species probiotic (NordBiotic, MBM Biotix) containing B. lactis BL040, B. breve BB010, Bifidobacterium longum BL020, Bifidobacterium bifidum BF030, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LR110, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei LPC100, L. acidophilus LA120, Lacticaseibacillus casei LC130, L. plantarum LP140, and Streptococcus thermophilus ST250 as 2.5 billion CFUs total twice daily for 8 weeks improves overall symptom severity, as well as pain severity, pain frequency, and quality of life when compared with placebo. Symptom severity was rated as mild by approximately 60% of those taking the probiotic mixture, compared with 30% of those taking placebo (107516). However, multiple studies show that taking capsules or drinking fermented milk containing a combination of B. lactis BB-12, L. paracasei, and L. acidophilus La510 as 26 billion CFUs total twice daily for 2-6 months does not improve gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with IBS (90236,94696,94697).
Respiratory tract infections. Most clinical research shows that taking Bifidobacterium lactis alone or in combination with other probiotics may reduce the risk of respiratory infections in otherwise healthy individuals. In patients who are not otherwise healthy, most clinical research shows that taking oral B. lactis has not demonstrated benefit. Details: Clinical research in infants aged 6 to 12 months shows that taking B. lactis HN019 one million colony-forming units (CFUs) per gram of follow-on formula daily for 12 weeks reduces the incidence of confirmed (9.4% vs. 0.0%) and parentally reported (25.0% vs. 9.4%) upper respiratory tract infections when compared to formula without added probiotics. Infants consumed an average of 141 grams of formula daily (110988). Another clinical trial in one month old infants shows that taking B. lactis BB-12 10 billion CFUs daily for an average of about 15 months reduces the proportion of children with respiratory tract infections until age 2 by 13% when compared with taking placebo. The frequency of recurrent respiratory tract infections was not different between groups (95381). In contrast, other clinical research in children attending day care shows that taking B. lactis BB-12 one billion CFUs daily for 3 months does not reduce the duration or incidence of respiratory tract infections (95382). Most research in children also shows that taking B. lactis in combination with other ingredients reduces the risk of respiratory infections. One clinical study shows that children ages 3-5 years who attend day-care centers have significantly fewer influenza-like respiratory symptoms when given milk containing a specific combination of 5 billion CFUs each of B. lactis and Lactobacillus acidophilus (HOWARU Protect, Danisco). Children taking this product seem to have a 45% lower risk of experiencing fever, cough, and rhinorrhea when compared with placebo. The duration of symptoms was also 2 days shorter. These patients were also less likely to use an antibiotic for their symptoms (16847). A clinical study in healthy children aged 3-10 years shows that taking 12.5 billion CFUs daily of a specific combination of B. lactis CUL34 (Lab4), Bifidobacterium bifidum CUL20, and L. acidophilus CUL21 and CUL60, plus vitamin C 50 mg daily reduces the risk of cough by 16% and sore throat by 20% and modestly reduces school absenteeism and antibiotic use when compared with placebo. However, nasal symptoms, fever, and wheezing were not reduced (106943). Another clinical study in children 3-12 years of age with a sick household member shows that taking a combination product (Up4-Junior, UAS Laboratories) containing B. lactis UABLA-12 4 billion CFUs and L. acidophilus DDS-1 1 billion CFUs with fructo-oligosaccharides 50 mg daily for 2 weeks modestly shortens the duration of respiratory infections, but does not reduce the risk of developing an infection, when compared with placebo (98439). In healthy children ages 3-6 years, taking a combination of B. lactis BB-12 and Enterococcus faecium L3 (iNatal Ped, Pharmextracta SpA) 2 billion CFUs each daily for 3 months reduces the incidence of upper respiratory tract infections by 84% compared with children not taking probiotics. The duration of infections was reduced by 50% (110991). The effect of B. lactis on respiratory tract infections has also been examined in adults. In healthy overweight adults or adults with obesity, taking 50 billion CFUs of a specific combination of B. lactis (Lab4P), B. bifidum, L. acidophilus, and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum for 24 weeks reduces the overall likelihood of having upper respiratory tract infection symptoms, such as sneezing, cough, and blocked nose, by approximately 40% when compared with placebo (103439). In college students, clinical research shows that taking B. lactis BB-12 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LGG one billion CFUs each daily for 12 weeks reduces the duration of upper respiratory tract infection by about 2 days when compared with placebo. Symptom severity was reduced by 34%. There was also a small reduction in the number of missed school days, but not work days (110993). Some research has investigated the effects of B. lactis on respiratory tract infection outcomes in patients who are not otherwise healthy. One clinical trial in children hospitalized with an acute respiratory tract infection shows that taking B. lactis Probio-M8 20 billion CFUs daily from admission until 4 weeks after discharge modestly reduces the duration of nasal, throat, and general aching symptoms when compared with taking placebo. Taking B. lactis also modestly reduced the proportion of patients requiring hospitalization of at least 7 days (110984). Despite these findings, another clinical trial in children and adolescents who are hospitalized shows that taking B. lactis 100 million CFUs daily during a hospital stay does not reduce the incidence or duration of respiratory infections, including common cold, rhinitis, sinusitis, and others, when compared with placebo (92265). Also, in older adults in long-term care, taking a combination of B. lactis BB-12 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus 13-16 billion CFUs daily does not reduce the incidence of upper or lower respiratory infections when compared with placebo over a 12-month period, and increases the use of antibiotics for lower respiratory tract infections by 2.2 days (103425).

Dental caries. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis does not seem to be beneficial for preventing dental caries in young children. Details: Clinical research in infants shows that giving B. lactis BB-12 DSM 15954 (Chr. Hansen A/S) 5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily, starting at age 1-2 months and continuing for an average of 15 months, through a sustained-release pacifier or tablet does not reduce the incidence of dental caries at age 4 when compared with placebo (107588).

Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children aged 6-17 years with allergic rhinitis shows that taking a specific combination product (Inatal ped Pharmaextracta) containing B. lactis BB-12 DSM 15954 and Enterococcus faecium L3 LMG P-27496 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) each with oligofructose daily for 3 months prior to a high allergen exposure period the period modestly reduces symptoms of allergic rhinitis and the need for corticosteroids and/or oral antihistamines when compared with baseline (107582). However, other clinical research shows that drinking 250 mL of fermented milk containing B. lactis BB-12 50 billion CFUs, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG 50 billion CFUs, and Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 5 billion CFUs from 36 weeks' gestation until 3 months postpartum does not reduce the incidence of allergic rhinitis in the child at 6 years of age when compared with placebo milk (96893).
Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 clinical trials in hospitalized or outpatient adults shows that taking B. lactis in combination with up to 8 other probiotic strains reduces the risk of antibiotic-associated diarrhea by 30% when compared with taking placebo (107635). However, individual clinical trials have mixed results. Some specific combination products containing B. bifidum have shown benefit for antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD). One such product is Ecologic AAD, which contains B. lactis NIZO 3680, Bifidobacterium bifidum NIZO 3804, Enterococcus faecium NIZO 3886, L. acidophilus NIZO 3678 and NIZO 3887, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei NIZO 3672, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NIZO 3684, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus NIZO 3689, and Ligilactobacillus salivarius NIZO 3675. Another evaluated product contains B. lactis BB-12 5.9 billion CFUs daily, L. rhamnosus GG 5.2 billion CFUs, and L. acidophilus La-5 8.3 billion CFUs daily. However, other combinations do not appear to be beneficial. These include B. lactis BB-12 and L. acidophilus LA-5; B. lactis BB-12 and L. rhamnosus; B. lactis, B. bifidum, and L. acidophilus; and B. lactis W51, B. bifidum W23, L. acidophilus W37, L. acidophilus W55, L. paracasei W20, L. plantarum W62, L. rhamnosus W71, and L. salivarius W24 (90239,92255,94692,95348,95405,103425,110969). It is too soon to know which combinations might be most beneficial, if any, for preventing AAD.
Atopic dermatitis (eczema). It is unclear if oral Bifidobacterium lactis is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of atopic dermatitis. Details: Some research has evaluated B. lactis for TREATING atopic dermatitis. One very small clinical study shows that giving infants a formula containing B. lactis BB-12 (Chr. Hansen A/S) 30-80 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily helps reduce the severity of eczema and the markers for allergic responses, including soluble CD4 in serum and eosinophilic protein X in urine when compared with baseline (3458). However, preliminary clinical research shows that giving B. lactis CNCM I-3446 10 billion CFUs to infants as an adjunct to standard topical treatment daily for 3 months does not reduce eczema severity when compared with placebo (90256). B. lactis has also been investigated in combination with other ingredients. In children, taking B. lactis as part of a multi-ingredient formulation for 8 or 12 weeks modestly reduces symptom severity and the need for topical corticosteroids when compared with placebo (107531,110995). In these studies, 1 billion CFUs of a 1:1:1 combination of B. lactis CECT 8145, Lacticaseibacillus casei CECT 9104, and Bifidobacterium longum CECT 7347 daily was used in children ages 4-17 years for 12 weeks (107531) or B. lactis UABLA-12 was taken in combination with Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 for a total of 10 billion CFUs daily along with fructo-oligosaccharide 100 mg (DDS Junior) daily for 8 weeks by children ages 1-3 years (110995). B. lactis-containing probiotics have also been investigated for PREVENTING atopic dermatitis. A meta-analysis of small- to medium-sized studies shows that providing mixed strains of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria to infants during pregnancy and/or in early infancy prevents atopic dermatitis in the child by approximately 40% over the next 0.5-2 years (107503). Although this analysis was not limited to studies examining the effects of B. lactis, seven of the nine studies used B. lactis as part of a combination product. Individual studies included in the analysis have shown that taking a combination of B. lactis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Ligilactobacillus salivarius, and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei during pregnancy from approximately 35 weeks' gestation until birth, and then giving this combination to the infant after birth until 6 months of age, does not reduce the incidence of eczema at age 2 years, although it does appear to reduce the risk of atopic sensitization by 57% (90234). A secondary analysis of a clinical study included in this analysis in infants aged 8-14 months found that taking a daily mixture of B. lactis and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus 1 billion CFUs each daily for 6 months is associated with a lower incidence of eczema when compared with placebo (102286). Also, some clinical research shows that supplementation with 250 mL of fermented milk containing B. lactis BB-12, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, and Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 starting at 36 weeks' gestation and continuing until 3 months postpartum, without supplementation in the infant, reduces the overall occurrence of atopic dermatitis in the child at 2 years of age. At 6 years of age, the effect appears to be inconclusive (96893).
Bipolar disorder. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with bipolar disorder who were recently hospitalized for a manic episode shows that taking a combination probiotic containing B. lactis BB-12 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG 100 million colony-forming units daily for 24 weeks reduces the risk of rehospitalization when compared with placebo. The hazard ratio for the first rehospitalization due to worsening of psychiatric symptoms was 0.37 for the combination probiotic group when compared with placebo. Among patients who were re-hospitalized, taking the combination probiotic reduced the mean duration of rehospitalization by 5.4 days when compared with placebo (96896).
Cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral Bifidobacterium lactis for cancer prevention or treatment, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of B. lactis for this condition.
Canker sores. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small study shows that taking a combination of B. lactis, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, and Lactobacillus acidophilus reduces pain, but does not affect the number of lesions or healing time, when compared with placebo. Also, another small study shows that using lozenges providing inulin 0.13 gram along with B. lactis and L. acidophilus 1.5 billion colony-forming units each reduces pain, but does not affect ulcer size or healing, when compared with Oracure gel (105146).
Child development. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: An 11-year follow-up study evaluating B. lactis and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus taken daily during pregnancy from 35 weeks' gestation until birth, or six months after birth if breastfeeding, and then giving the same supplement to the infant until 2 years of age, does not affect neurocognitive outcomes such as attention, intelligence, executive function, depression, and anxiety when compared with those taking placebo (102287).
Clostridioides difficile infection. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in inpatients aged 65 years or older shows that taking a combination of B. lactis, Bifidobacterium bifidium, and Lactobacillus acidophilus 60 billion colony-forming units daily for 21 days does not reduce the incidence of C. difficile diarrhea when compared with placebo (92255). Other combinations also do not appear to be beneficial, including a combination of B. lactis Bi-04, B. lactis Bi-07, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, as well as a combination of B. lactis Bb-12, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, and L. acidophilus La-5 (95364).
Critical illness (trauma). Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in multi-trauma patients requiring ventilation shows that taking a combination probiotic containing B. lactis twice daily for 15 days modestly reduces the risk of sepsis, as well as the length of stay in the ICU and hospital, when compared with placebo. The product contained B. lactis BB12 1.75 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) in combination with Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 1.75 billion CFUs, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 500 million CFUs, and Saccharomyces boulardii 1.5 billion CFUs. Half of the dose was given onto the oropharynx and half via a nasogastric tube (107524).
Dental plaque. It is unclear if Bifidobacterium lactis is beneficial for preventing dental plaque. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming a yogurt supplemented with B. lactis DN-173010 100 million colony-forming units daily between breakfast and lunch for 4 weeks does not prevent gingivitis or plaque when compared with a placebo yogurt. However, following a non-brushing period of 5 days, both gingivitis and plaque were modestly reduced in individuals consuming the B. lactis-containing yogurt (98502). Clinical research in adolescent boys aged 13-15 years with mild to moderate gingival inflammation shows that taking two lozenges containing B. lactis BB-12 (Chr. Hansen A/S) and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (Probiotical SpA) twice daily for 4 weeks does not reduce plaque when compared with placebo. However, there was a benefit on levels of some salivary and plaque pathogenic bacteria. Each lozenge provided B. lactis BB-12 470 million colony-forming units (CFUs) and L. rhamnosus 440 million CFUs (107574). Conversely, a small clinical trial in healthy adults shows that taking four lozenges daily providing a total daily dose of 2 billion CFUs each of B. lactis BB-12 DSM 15954 (Chr. Hansen A/S) and L. rhamnosus GG ATCC 53103 (Probiotical SpA) for 4 weeks modestly reduces plaque when compared with placebo (107572).
Diabetes. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of four clinical trials shows that taking probiotics during pregnancy is unlikely to prevent gestational diabetes and increases the risk of pre-eclampsia by 85% when compared with placebo. Although the specific effects of B. lactis are unclear from this analysis, three of the included studies used B. lactis in combination with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (105185). Other clinical research that has found no benefit has used B. lactis BB-12 and L. rhamnosus GG at least 1 billion CFUs daily from 16-20 weeks' gestation until 28 weeks' gestation, or B. lactis 420 DSM 22089 (Dupont Nutrition & Health) and L. rhamnosus HN001 ATCC SD5675 as 10 billion CFUs each daily throughout pregnancy, with or without fish oil (102284,105144). Conversely, one small clinical study in adults with gestational diabetes shows that taking a combination of B. lactis BB-12, Streptococcus thermophilus STY-31, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5, and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus LBY-27 for 8 weeks, starting at 24-28 weeks' gestation, modestly reduces fasting blood glucose and improves insulin sensitively when compared with placebo (96892). In children aged 8-17 years with type I diabetes, taking B. lactis Bb12 DSM 15954 and L. rhamnosus GG ATCC 53103 1 billion CFUs daily for 6 months does not reduce insulin requirements or levels of glycated hemoglobin over 12 months when compared with placebo. In addition, C-peptide levels and the maintenance of residual pancreatic beta-cell function were not affected (107518). A small clinical trial in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking fermented goat milk 120 grams containing one billion colony-forming units each of B. lactis BB-12 and Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 daily for 6 weeks modestly reduces levels of glycated hemoglobin and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, but not fasting blood glucose or insulin resistance, when compared with conventional fermented milk containing Streptococcus thermophilus TA-40 (110973).
Diarrhea. It is unclear if oral Bifidobacterium lactis is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of diarrhea. Details: The European Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases recommends probiotics in hospitalized children with diarrhea (98469) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommends probiotics for the outpatient treatment of acute diarrhea (95388). However, B. lactis is not a specific focus of the guidelines and most evidence is low quality. Clinical research shows that B. lactis reduces the duration of acute diarrhea in children by about one day (107636). In older adults in long-term care, clinical research shows that taking a combination of B. lactis BB-12 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus 13-16 billion colony-forming units daily does not reduce the incidence or duration of diarrhea over a 12-month period when compared with placebo (103425).
Familial hypercholesterolemia. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in children 6-18 years of age with high cholesterol shows that taking a probiotic containing B. lactis MB 2409, Bifidobacterium bifidum MB 109, and Bifidobacterium longum BL04 daily for 12 weeks decreases total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride levels by 2% to 3% and increases HDL cholesterol levels by about 2% when compared with placebo. However, these changes might not be considered clinically significant (98736).
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients newly diagnosed with GAD shows that taking sertraline 25 mg plus probiotics daily for 8 weeks may modestly reduce some symptoms of anxiety when compared with sertraline alone. However, the reduction in anxiety score was small and change was not consistent between rating scales. Also, the quality of life was not improved. The probiotics provided a total of 18 billion colony-forming units of B. lactis, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Lactobacillus acidophilus (110977).
Gingivitis. It is unclear if oral Bifidobacterium lactis is beneficial for gingivitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming a yogurt supplemented with B. lactis DN-173010 100 million colony-forming units (CFUs) daily between breakfast and lunch for 4 weeks does not prevent gingivitis or plaque when compared with a placebo yogurt. However, following a non-brushing period of 5 days, both gingivitis and plaque were modestly reduced in individuals consuming the B. lactis-containing yogurt (98502). Another clinical trial following cleaning in patients with gingivitis shows that taking lozenges containing B. lactis HN019 (HOWARU Bifdo LYO 40 DCU-S, Danisco) one billion CFUs twice daily for 8 weeks increases the proportion of patients without generalized gingivitis by almost 50%, and modestly reduces bleeding with probing and gingivitis severity, compared with placebo lozenges. There was no effect on plaque (110992). B. lactis has also been investigated in combination with other ingredients. Clinical research in adolescent boys aged 13-15 years with mild to moderate gingival inflammation shows that taking two lozenges containing B. lactis BB-12 (Chr. Hansen A/S) and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (Probiotical SpA) twice daily for 4 weeks modestly reduces gingivitis when compared with placebo. Each lozenge provided B. lactis BB-12 480 million colony-forming units (CFUs) and L. rhamnosus 440 million CFUs (107574). A small clinical trial in healthy adults shows that taking four lozenges daily providing a total daily dose of 2 billion CFUs each of B. lactis BB-12 DSM 15954 (Chr. Hansen A/S) and L. rhamnosus GG ATCC 53103 (Probiotical SpA) for 4 weeks modestly reduces plaque and gingivitis when compared with placebo (107572).
Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if oral Bifidobacterium lactis is beneficial for H. pylori; some research suggests that B. lactis may minimize the adverse effects of H. pylori eradication therapy, but not all research agrees. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that adding B. lactis B94 7 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily to sequential H. pylori eradication therapy for 2 weeks results in an eradication rate of 87%, compared with 71% of those taking placebo or using no control along with sequential eradication therapy. Use of B. lactis also reduced treatment non-compliance due to diarrhea during the first week and reduced symptoms such as loss of appetite, nausea, and abdominal pain. In order to have one beneficial outcome, 6.2 patients would need to take B. lactis. There was no overall effect on non-compliance related to diarrhea or to skin rash (107589). Another clinical study shows that taking a specific combination of B. lactis and a lactobacilli species (Ferzym, Specchiasol) 5 billion CFUs daily for one week during standard triple therapy and one week thereafter reduces some treatment-related adverse effects such as taste disturbances and diarrhea, although it does not seem to improve compliance (12763). However, there was no difference in eradication rates or symptom relief in children aged 6-16 years taking B. lactis B94 5 billion CFUs daily plus inulin 900 mg for 14 days along with standard triple therapy (107590). Discrepancies may be related to the population studied or to the B. lactis strain, the other ingredients, or the type of H. pylori treatment used in the available research.
Hypercholesterolemia. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of nine small to moderate-sized clinical studies shows that taking a combination of B. lactis and Lactobacillus acidophilus reduces levels of total cholesterol when compared with placebo (107591). Populations in the included clinical trials enrolled patients with hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), metabolic syndrome, and others. The benefits of B. lactis in patients with hypercholesterolemia are unclear.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small preliminary clinical trial shows that taking 10 billion colony-forming units each of B. lactis BB-12 and Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 twice daily for 12 weeks does not increase the proportion of patients with a reduction in weekly bowel frequency of at least 50% when compared with placebo. Also, there was no effect of this combination on stool consistency or abdominal symptoms. However, there were some modest benefits when compared with baseline (110999). This study was small and may have been underpowered to detect differences.
Malnourishment-related diarrhea. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in children aged 6 months to 4 years of age hospitalized with severe acute malnutrition shows that taking B. lactis BB-12 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LGG 5 billion colony-forming units each daily during hospitalization and for 8-12 weeks as an outpatient does not affect diarrhea incidence or severity or the number of days with diarrhea during hospitalization. However, the number of days with diarrhea as an outpatient was reduced by 2.2 days (110996).
Malnutrition. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in children aged 6 months to 4 years of age hospitalized with severe acute malnutrition shows that taking B. lactis BB-12 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LGG 5 billion colony-forming units each daily during hospitalization and for 8-12 weeks as an outpatient does not affect pneumonia incidence, duration, or severity, weight gain, duration of hospitalization, or other outcomes (110996).
Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral Bifidobacterium lactis is beneficial for metabolic syndrome. Details: In patients with metabolic syndrome, preliminary clinical research shows that taking fermented milk 80 mL providing B. lactis HN019 27.2 billion colony-forming units daily for 45 days reduces body mass index by approximately 4% and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by approximately 14% when compared with no treatment. There was no effect on waist circumference, glucose control, or other blood lipids (105154).
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). It is unclear if oral Bifidobacterium lactis is beneficial or safe for NEC prevention. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research generally show that giving various bifidobacteria species alone does NOT reduce the risk of NEC or all-cause mortality. However, only a few of the studies included in these analyses have used B. lactis (95344,95351,103437,105164). A systematic review of four studies using B. lactis shows that although NEC incidence is reduced by 89% in one study, a significant reduction was not identified in the other studies when compared with placebo (107592). A network meta-analysis of two clinical studies shows that taking a combination probiotic containing B. lactis Bb-12, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis Bb-02, and Streptococcus thermophilus TH-4, reduces the risk of NEC by 71% when compared with control (102437). Despite these findings, guidance among regulatory agencies and clinical organizations varies with respect to the use of probiotics in very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns that preterm infants given probiotics are at risk of serious infections caused by the bacteria or fungi contained in probiotics due to cases reported in this group of infants (111610). Also, The American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to preterm infants, particularly those with a birth weight below 1000 grams, due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy and potential for harm in this vulnerable population (111608). The Canadian Paediatric Society, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition state that probiotic combinations may be of benefit in reducing the incidence of NEC in preterm neonates over 1000 grams. However, B. lactis is not specifically recommended (103003,111609,111611).
Neonatal jaundice. It is unclear if oral Bifidobacterium lactis is beneficial for neonatal jaundice. Details: Clinical research in newborns with jaundice shows that taking B. lactis CP-9 5 billion colony-forming units twice daily during conventional phototherapy treatment reduces the duration of phototherapy by about 13 hours and modestly improves the decline in serum bilirubin when compared with taking placebo. A sub-analysis shows that this benefit is limited to full-term, and not preterm, newborns (110987).
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In children with NAFLD, clinical research shows that taking a specific combination (Prokid, Gostaresh Milad Pouya Company) containing B. lactis DSMZ 32269 6 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC B3208 3 billion CFUs, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus DSMZ 21690 2 billion CFUs, and Bifidobacterium bifidum ATCC SD6576 2 billion CFUs daily for 12 weeks normalizes liver sonography findings in 53% of children, compared with 17% of those taking placebo. In addition, levels of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase are reduced by 30% and 25%, respectively. There was no effect on body mass index or blood lipids when compared with placebo (105156). However, other research in adults with NAFLD shows that taking probiotic yogurt 100 grams fortified with vitamin D 1000 IU plus B. lactis Bb-12 and L. acidophilus 40 million CFUs daily for 3 months does not improve fasting blood glucose levels, insulin levels, blood pressure, or anthropometric indices when compared with unfortified yogurt (105174).
Obesity. It is unclear if oral Bifidobacterium lactis is beneficial for weight loss. Details: Clinical research in overweight and obese adults shows that taking B. lactis 420 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 6 months does not reduce body fat or body weight when compared with placebo (95356). However, in individuals with abdominal obesity, clinical research shows that taking B. lactis CECT 8145 (Ba8145) 10 billion CFUs for 3 months modestly decreases body mass index (BMI) when compared with placebo. Also, taking heat-killed B. lactis CECT 8145 (Ba8145) 10 billion CFUs modestly decreases waist circumference when compared with placebo. Sub-group analyses show that these benefits occur only in females, and there was no effect of these products on the visceral or subcutaneous fat areas when compared with placebo (105551). Another clinical trial shows that taking 10 billion colony-forming units each of B. lactis 420 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus HN001 daily, alone and with fish oil providing eicosapentaenoic acid 0.22 grams and docosahexaenoic acid 1.9 grams (Croda Europe Ltd.), during pregnancy and for 6 months postpartum, reduces the odds of overweight at 24 months by approximately 64% or 78%, respectively, when compared with taking placebo (110336). When taken in combination with Lactobacillus acidophilus LA02, B. lactis BS01 2 billion CFUs daily for 6 weeks does not reduce body weight or body fat when compared with placebo in young, healthy individuals, only some of whom were overweight (103438). In contrast to these findings, clinical research shows that taking 50 billion CFUs of a specific combination of B. lactis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, L. acidophilus, and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (Lab4P) for 24 weeks reduces body weight by an additional 1.3 kg more than placebo (103439). Heat-killed B. lactis has also been investigated in combination with other ingredientd. Clinical research shows that taking enriched seafood sticks 50 grams daily providing heat-inactivated B. lactis CECT 8145 5 billion colony-forming units, inulin 1.7 grams, and eicosapentaenoic acid plus docosahexaenoic acid 370 mg daily for 12 weeks does not reduce body weight, body fat, blood pressure, or most lipid or glycemic indices, when compared to taking conventional seafood sticks. There was a modest decrease in insulin levels in males (110997).
Oropharyngeal candidiasis. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In older adults in long-term care, clinical research shows that taking a combination of B. lactis BB-12 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus 13-16 billion colony-forming units daily does not reduce the incidence of oropharyngeal candidiasis when compared with placebo over a 12-month period (103425).
Otitis media. It is unclear if oral Bifidobacterium lactis is beneficial for preventing otitis media. Details: Clinical research in one month old infants shows that taking B. lactis BB-12 10 billion colony-forming units daily for an average of about 15 months does not reduce the proportion of children with otitis media by two years of age when compared with taking placebo (95381).
Periodontitis. It is unclear if oral Bifidobacterium lactis is beneficial for periodontitis. Details: In patients with periodontitis, a small clinical trial shows that taking B. lactis HN019 lozenges providing 1 billion colony-forming units twice daily (HOWARU1 Bifido LYO 40 DCU-S, DuPont Danisco Sweeteners Oy) for 30 days after scaling and root planing modestly improves some measures of periodontitis 60 days after treatment completion, including pocket depth and clinical attachment, when compared with using placebo lozenges. In addition, although the risk for disease progression was not improved when compared with placebo, there was a reduction in the need for additional therapy in at least three sites (105157,105158,107622).
Postoperative bowel function. It is unclear if oral Bifidobacterium lactis is beneficial for improving postoperative bowel function. Details: Clinical research in patients undergoing colorectal polyp resection shows that taking B. lactis MH-02 2 billion colony-forming units daily for 7 days postoperatively does not reduce total postoperative gastrointestinal symptom severity when compared with taking placebo. However, the time to recovery of bowel function was reduced by about 0.7 days and there were modest improvements in defecation difficulty (110985).
Postpartum depression. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a combination of B. lactis 420 DSM 22,089 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus HN001 ATCC SD5675 (Dupont Nutrition & Health) 10 billion CFUs daily, alone or with fish oil providing eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 0.44 grams and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 3.8 grams daily, does not reduce symptoms of postpartum depression or anxiety when compared with placebo. Supplements were started in the second trimester of pregnancy and continued until 6 months after delivery (107496).
Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). It is unclear if oral Bifidobacterium lactis is beneficial for PWS. Details: A small clinical trial in children with PWS shows that taking B. lactis BPL1 CECT8145 (Archer Daniels Midland Co-Biópolis) 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 12 weeks does not improve fat mass, abdominal adiposity, lipid profile, blood pressure, or glucose control when compared with placebo. However, there was a small improvement in insulin levels and measures of insulin resistance. Also, abdominal adiposity was modestly improved in a sub-group of patients over age 4.5 years, the age at which excessive weight gain typically starts in this population (105149). Other clinical research in children with PWS shows that taking B. lactis BL-11 (Beijing Huayuan Academy of Biotechnology) 30 billion CFUs twice daily for 12 weeks does not affect weight or psychological outcomes, including behavior, communication, and motor skills, when compared with placebo. However, height and overall clinical impression were modestly improved (107585).
Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small preliminary clinical trial shows that taking probiotics during pregnancy reduces the severity and duration of nausea and vomiting by 16% to 54%. There was also a small benefit on stool hardness. A specific probiotic (Probiotics 10, Nature's Bounty) was taken as 2 capsules daily for two back-to-back cycles comprised of six days with probiotics and two days without. Each capsule contained a total of 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of B. lactis Bl-04, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 299v and DSM 15312, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus Lb-87, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei DSM 13434 and Lpc-37, Ligilactobacillus salivarius Ls-33, Levilactobacillus brevis Lbr-35, Lactobacillus acidophilus La-14, and Lacticaseibacillus casei Lc-11, along with inulin 200 mg (107199).
Prematurity. It is unclear if oral Bifidobacterium lactis is beneficial for preventing infections in premature infants. Details: A small clinical trial in very low birth weight premature infants shows that taking B. lactis BB-12 two billion colony-forming units per kg six times daily from birth for 6 weeks does not reduce the incidence of nosocomial infections when compared with taking placebo (110994). This study may have been too small to detect differences.
Psoriasis. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with psoriasis shows that taking a mixture of probiotics for 8 weeks modestly improves overall disease symptoms and feelings of depression when compared with placebo. The percentage of patients achieving at least a 50% or 75% reduction in overall symptom score was 40% and 24%, respectively, compared with 16% and 8% of those taking placebo. The probiotic was taken twice daily and provided a total daily dose of 2.6 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of B. lactis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum, and Lactobacillus acidophilus (107498).
Radiation-induced diarrhea. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with cervical cancer receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy shows that taking a specific product (Biogurt, Fame Pharmaceuticals) containing B. lactis BB-12 and Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 1.75 billion lyophilized live colony-forming units in a capsule three times daily throughout radiation treatment reduces the risk of diarrhea by 28% when compared with placebo. Taking probiotics also reduced the use of loperamide when compared with placebo (102285).
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although there has been interest in using oral Bifidobacterium lactis for RA, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of B. lactis for this condition.
Rotaviral diarrhea. It is unclear if oral B. lactis is beneficial for rotaviral diarrhea. Details: Small clinical studies show that giving B. lactis BB-12 alone or along with Streptococcus thermophilus may help reduce the incidence of diarrhea and rotavirus shedding in infants and children up to 36 months old (3169).
Ulcerative colitis. Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking a specific product (Probio-Tec AB-25) containing B. lactis BB-12 and Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 is not beneficial for preventing relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis when compared with placebo (95338).
Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients in adults and children; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In children aged 4 months to 5 years with a previous UTI, clinical research shows that taking a specific combination (Complete Probiotic Platinum) of B. lactis 750 million colony-forming units (CFUs), Bifidobacterium bifidum 200 million CFUs, Lactobacillus acidophilus 750 million CFUs, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus 50 million CFUs per kg twice daily for 18 months increases the median time to the first incidence of recurrence by approximately 3 months and increases the percentage of children without a UTI during the study period from 83% to 97% (103436). However, in older adults in long-term care, taking a combination of B. lactis BB-12 and L. rhamnosus 13-16 billion CFUs daily does not reduce the incidence of UTI when compared with placebo over a 12-month period (103425).
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Oral Bifidobacterium lactis has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking B. lactis BB12 1.75 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 1.75 billion CFUs, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 500 million CFUs, and Saccharomyces boulardii 1.5 billion CFUs twice daily for 15 days reduces the risk of VAP to 12%, compared with 28% of patients taking placebo. Half of the dose was given onto the oropharynx and half via a nasogastric tube (107524). More evidence is needed to rate Bifidobacterium lactis for these uses.

Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a specific L. casei-containing combination product (Bio-K+ CI1285) may be beneficial for preventing antibiotic-associated diarrhea. This combination product provides L. casei LBC80R, Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CLR2 as 100 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily (25494,95402,95403) However, taking L. casei might not help with the treatment of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Clinical research in hospitalized patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea shows that taking a combination of L. casei 20 million CFUs and Bifidobacterium breve 50 million CFUs 3 times daily does not reduce the average duration of diarrhea, the frequency of healing, or relapse rates, when compared with taking placebo (111006).
Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In children under two years of age with atopic dermatitis who are on a cow's milk protein elimination diet, clinical research shows that taking a specific mixture (Latopic, Biomed S.A.) providing 1 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of L. casei ôOCK 0919 50%, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus ŁOCK 0900 25%, and L. rhamnosus ôOCK 0908 25% for 3 months increases the odds of a 30% or greater improvement in symptom scores by about 2.6-fold when compared with placebo. However, there was no difference in the absolute symptom scores between groups. Beneficial effects of this combination were greater in children confirmed to have allergen sensitization (107510). Other clinical research in children ages 4-17 years shows that taking 1 billion CFUs of a 1:1:1 combination of L. casei CECT 9104, Bifidobacterium lactis CECT 8145, and Bifidobacterium longum CECT 7347 for 12 weeks modestly reduces symptom severity and the need for topical corticosteroids when compared with placebo (107531).
Cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus casei for cancer prevention or treatment, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. casei for this condition.
Clostridioides difficile infection. Some early research suggests that oral Lacticaseibacillus casei may be beneficial for preventing a first C. difficile infection. However, the quality of evidence is generally poor, and taking oral L. casei does not seem to be beneficial for the prevention of C. difficile recurrence. Details: Evidence from clinical and observational research investigating the effect of L. casei on C. difficile occurrence or recurrence is weak. Most studies use this species in combination with one or more additional probiotic species, including a specific product (Bio-K+ Cl1285) providing L. casei LBC80R and Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285 and a specific product (Bio-K+ 50 Billion; Bio-K Plus International) providing L. casei LBC80R, L. acidophilus CL1285, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CLR2 as 50 or 100 billion CFUs daily (25494,90231,90934,95369,95403,107529). Observational research has found that providing a specific combination (Bio-K+ 50 Billion; Bio-K Plus International) of L. casei LBC80R, L. rhamnosus CLR2, and L. acidophilus CL1285 as 50-100 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 5 days to patients who are on antibiotics for at least 2 days reduces the hospital-wide incidence of C. difficile by approximately 40%. The incidence rate was decreased by at least 50% in the highest risk individuals taking this combination (107529). Current guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) state that there is insufficient information to recommend administration of probiotics for the primary prevention of C. difficile-associated diarrhea (107538).
Constipation. Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Combinations of probiotics containing L. casei appear to increase stool frequency and improve symptoms of functional constipation in adults. These combinations include Hexbio, containing L. casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis 30 billion CFUs twice daily for 7 days (90266), and ID-HWS1000, containing L. casei IDCC 3451, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum IDCC 3501, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus IDCC 3201, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis IDCC 4301, Bifidobacterium breve IDCC 4401, Lactococcus lactis IDCC 2301, xylooligosaccharide, and dietary fiber as nondigestible maltodextrin, oat fiber, and psyllium husk fiber (107517).
Depression. Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with major depression shows that taking L. casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium bifidum daily for 8 weeks reduces symptoms of depression measured on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) when compared with placebo (99780). However, the validity of the results from this study is limited by incomplete reporting. For example, patient baseline BDI scores were not reported.
Diabetes. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus casei is beneficial for treatment of type 2 or gestational diabetes. Details: In patients with gestational diabetes, clinical research shows that taking a combination of freeze-dried L. casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium bifidum each as 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) per gram daily for 6 weeks improves fasting blood glucose levels and glycemic control when compared with placebo (95416,98430). Furthermore, a sub-analysis of a meta-analysis of clinical research investigating the effects of L. casei as part of multi-ingredient probiotic and prebiotic products shows that taking products containing L. casei modestly reduces fasting insulin levels and improves insulin resistance in this population. There were also modest reductions in triglyceride levels; however, the effects on fasting blood glucose were not significant (111796). It is unclear from these studies if any beneficial effects are related to L. casei, L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, or the combination. Limited evidence from mainly small clinical trials has also assessed the effects of L. casei for type 2 diabetes. In one study, taking L. casei 100 million CFUs daily for 8 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose by about 28 mg/dL when compared with placebo. There was no effect on glycated hemoglobin; however, the duration was inadequate to demonstrate an effect (99786). In another study, taking a specific product (Familact) containing L. casei and six other probiotic strains daily for 6 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose, but does not affect plasma insulin, when compared with placebo (99790).
Diarrhea. Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children with dysentery being treated with ceftriaxone shows that taking a specific combination probiotic sachet (Kidilact, Zisttakhmir Company) containing L. casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, Bifidobacterium breve, and Streptococcus thermophilus daily for 5 days modestly reduces the duration of diarrhea, hospitalization, and blood in diarrhea when compared with control (102417). Although The European Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases recommends probiotics in hospitalized children with diarrhea (98469) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommends probiotics for the outpatient treatment of acute diarrhea (95388), both guidelines note that most evidence is low quality.
Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus casei is beneficial for H. pylori eradication in adults or children. Details: Clinical research in adults shows that taking L. casei along with six other probiotics in conjunction with bismuth quadruple therapy does not seem to improve H. pylori eradication rates when compared with placebo and bismuth quadruple therapy (90291). Also, taking a combination of L. casei and Lactobacillus acidophilus without any standard H. pylori therapies does not improve H. pylori eradication rates (12766). However, a clinical study in children shows that taking a fermented milk product containing L. casei DN-114 001 for 14 days along with triple therapy comprised of omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for 7 days improves the H. pylori eradication rate to approximately 85%, compared with 61% of those given triple therapy alone (107544).
HIV/AIDS. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus casei for HIV/AIDS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lactobacillus for this condition.
Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus casei is beneficial for hyperlipidemia. Details: In patients with primary hyperlipidemia, clinical research shows that taking L. casei 200 million colony-forming units in combination with red yeast rice twice daily for 8 weeks does not have beneficial effects on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglyceride levels, when compared with taking red yeast rice alone. Taking L. casei seems to modestly reduce diastolic blood pressure in this population; however, it is unclear if these changes are clinically significant (112517).
Hypertension. It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus casei is beneficial for lowering blood pressure. Details: A meta-analysis of 18 clinical trials shows that taking various species of lactobacilli as 100 million to 1.5 trillion colony-forming units daily for 3-24 weeks reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 3 mmHg and 1.5 mmHg, respectively, when compared with placebo in various populations. However, sub-group analyses of three clinical trials show that these benefits do not occur in clinical research investigating the effects of L. casei, specifically (105135).
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A clinical study in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS shows that taking a specific multi-species probiotic (NordBiotic, MBM Biotix) containing L. casei LC130, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LR110, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei LPC100, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA120, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP140, Bifidobacterium breve BB010, Bifidobacterium longum BL020, Bifidobacterium bifidum BF030, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BL040, and Streptococcus thermophilus ST250 as 2.5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) total twice daily for 8 weeks improves overall symptom severity, as well as pain severity, pain frequency, and quality of life, when compared with placebo. Symptom severity was rated as mild by approximately 60% of those taking the probiotic mixture, compared with 30% of those taking placebo (107516). However, clinical research shows that taking another multi-species combination of L. casei LBC80R, L. acidophilus CL1285, and L. rhamnosus CLR2 50 billion CFUs each daily for 3 months does not improve symptoms in patients with IBS when compared with placebo (99789).
Lyme disease. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus casei for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lactobacillus for this condition.
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus casei is beneficial or safe for NEC prevention. Details: Most meta-analyses of clinical research show that giving lactobacilli enterally reduces the risk of NEC and/or severe NEC in preterm, mainly very low birth weight (VLBW), infants. Some meta-analyses support the use of lactobacilli in combination with bifidobacteria, as opposed to lactobacilli alone for reducing the risk of NEC. However, the effects of L. casei specifically are unclear (95344,95351,103437,103445,104157,105162,105164). Also, guidance among regulatory agencies and clinical organizations varies with respect to the use of probiotics in very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns that preterm infants given probiotics are at risk of serious infections caused by the bacteria or fungi contained in probiotics due to cases reported in this group of infants (111610). Also, The American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to preterm infants, particularly those with a birth weight below 1000 grams, due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy and potential for harm in this vulnerable population (111608). The Canadian Paediatric Society, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition state that probiotic combinations may be of benefit in reducing the incidence of NEC in preterm neonates over 1000 grams. However, L. casei is not specifically recommended (103003,111609,111611).
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in adults with NAFLD shows that taking a combination of L. casei BCMC 12,313, Lactobacillus acidophilus BCMC 12,130, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis BCMC 12,451, Bifidobacterium bifidum BCMC 02290, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis BCMC 02129, and Bifidobacterium longum BCMC 02120 as 30 billion colony-forming units twice daily for 6 months has no beneficial effects on hepatic steatosis or fibrosis or on levels of liver enzymes, blood lipids, or fasting blood glucose, when compared with placebo (107523).
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In patients with PCOS, clinical research shows that taking a combination of L. casei T2 (IBRC-M10783), Lactobacillus acidophilus T16 (IBRC-M10785), and Bifidobacterium bifidum T1 (IBRC-M10771) as 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) each, plus inulin 800 mg, daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces serum insulin and triglyceride levels and improves insulin resistance and insulin sensitivity when compared with placebo. However, it does not alter cholesterol or fasting blood glucose levels (105159). Clinical research also shows that 31.3% of patients with PCOS taking L. casei in combination with other probiotics daily for 6 months had regular menstrual cycles compared with 12.5% of those taking placebo. There were also modest improvements in testosterone levels and waist circumference, but not other hormones, insulin resistance, body weight, or most measures of quality of life. The product provided L. casei UBLC-42 1 billion CFUs, along with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum UBLP-40, Lactobacillus acidophilus UBLA-34, Lacticaseibacillus casei UBLC-42, Limosilactobacillus fermentum UBLF-31, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus UBLR-58, Limosilactobacillus reuteri UBLRu-87, Bifidobacterium bifidum UBBB-55, and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) daily for 2 months and then twice daily for 4 months. All patients also underwent dietary and lifestyle changes (110974).
Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oral Lacticaseibacillus casei has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small preliminary clinical trial shows that taking probiotics during pregnancy reduces the severity and duration of nausea and vomiting by 16% to 54%. There was also a small benefit on stool hardness. A specific probiotic (Probiotics 10, Nature's Bounty) was taken as 2 capsules daily for two back-to-back cycles comprised of six days with probiotics and two days without. Each capsule contained a total of 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of L. casei Lc-11, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 299v and DSM 15312, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus Lb-87, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei DSM 13434 and Lpc-37, Ligilactobacillus salivarius Ls-33, Levilactobacillus brevis Lbr-35, Lactobacillus acidophilus La-14, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bl-04, along with inulin 200 mg (107199).
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Small clinical studies suggest that taking Lacticaseibacillus casei might be beneficial for RA. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with RA show that taking L. casei 01 as 100 million colony-forming units daily for 8 weeks reduces tender and swollen joints and increases the number of patients who experience moderate symptom improvement when compared with placebo (90230,90297). However, one small clinical study in patients with moderate-to-severe RA shows that taking capsules containing freeze-dried strains of L. casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium bifidum daily for 8 weeks does not reduce RA severity, the number of tender or swollen joints, or joint pain when compared with placebo (95418).
Rotaviral diarrhea. It is unclear if Lacticaseibacillus casei is beneficial for rotaviral diarrhea. Details: Although the World Gastroenterology Organization has not made a recommendation (98471), the European Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases recommends probiotics in hospitalized children with diarrhea (98469) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommends probiotics for the outpatient treatment of acute diarrhea (95388). However, these guidelines note that most evidence is low quality and is not specific to rotavirus infection. Furthermore, these guidelines were released prior to the publication of the most recent, high-quality studies showing no benefit with the use of certain probiotics (98427,98428). Research on the use of L. casei, specifically, for this purpose is lacking.
Short bowel syndrome. Although there has been interest in using oral Lacticaseibacillus casei for short bowel syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. casei for this condition.
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). It is unclear if oral Lacticaseibacillus casei is beneficial for the treatment of SIBO. Details: A small clinical study in children with chronic diarrhea due to SIBO shows that taking a combination of lyophilized L. casei 1.5 grams and Lactobacillus acidophilus 1.5 grams by mouth twice daily for 21 days decreases average daily stools by 1.5, but does not improve other symptoms, when compared with placebo (91143). Disparate study findings may be due to many factors, including differences in patient populations evaluated and use of different probiotic formulations. More evidence is needed to rate Lacticaseibacillus casei for these uses.

LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS (L. Bulgaricus, L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus)

Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Most research shows that oral Lactobacillus acidophilus, alone or in combination with other probiotics, seems to reduce the risk of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in adults. Details: A meta-analysis of 18 clinical trials in hospitalized or outpatient adults shows that taking L. acidophilus alone or in combination with up to 8 other probiotic strains reduces the risk of AAD by 34% when compared with taking placebo (107635). One small clinical trial in elderly adults shows that AAD occurred in 17% of those taking L. acidophilus (Florajen Acidophilus) 20 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) three times daily, compared with 37% of those taking placebo (95400). A number of combination products have also demonstrated benefit for preventing AAD, including Bio-K+ Cl1285 which provides L. acidophilus CL1285, Lacticaseibacillus casei LBC80R, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CLR2 as 100 billion CFUs daily (25494,95402,95403); L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (90239); and Ecologic AAD which provides L. acidophilus NIZO 3678 and NIZO 3887, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei NIZO 3672, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NIZO 3684, L. rhamnosus NIZO 3689, Ligilactobacillus salivarius NIZO 3675, Bifidobacterium bifidum NIZO 3804, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis NIZO 3680, and Enterococcus faecium NIZO 3886 (95405). However, some combination products have not demonstrated benefit. Clinical research shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus and bifidobacteria or a combination of L. acidophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (Lactinex) is not beneficial (90231,90239,92255,95385). An additional large clinical trial in children aged 3 months and up shows that taking L. acidophilus in combination with other probiotics does not reduce the risk of antibiotic-associated diarrhea when compared with taking placebo, when the more stringent definition is considered excluding diarrhea of other etiologies. However, the risk of diarrhea of any etiology is reduced by 35%. The probiotic supplement provided a total of 10 billion CFUs of L. acidophilus W37, Bifidobacterium bifidum W23, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis W51, Lactobacillus acidophilus W55, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei W20, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum W62, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus W71, and Ligilactobacillus salivarius W24 daily from the first day of antibiotic treatment until 7 days after treatment ended (110969).
Bacterial vaginosis. Most clinical research shows that intravaginal application of Lactobacillus acidophilus may be helpful for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. It is unclear if oral L. acidophilus is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of bacterial vaginosis. Details: One clinical trial shows that intravaginal suppositories containing 100 million to 1 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of L. acidophilus (Vivag, Pharma Vinci A/S) given twice daily for 6 days improve bacterial vaginosis resolution rates when compared with placebo (13177). Another clinical trial shows that using 1-2 vaginal tablets containing viable L. acidophilus 10 million CFUs and estriol 0.03 mg per tablet (Gynoflor, Medinova) daily for 6 days increases cure rates when compared with placebo (13176). However, using this product in combination with metronidazole 400 mg twice daily for 7 days does not improve outcomes when compared with metronidazole alone (90237). Preliminary clinical research in patients with clinically defined bacterial vaginosis shows that daily intravaginal application with a douche providing L. acidophilus 1 billion CFUs per mL for 6 days might have beneficial effects on the vaginal flora. When compared with 52.5% of patients with bacterial vaginosis based on bacterial flora at baseline, 7.5% met this criteria 14 days after treatment had been completed (111788). Oral L. acidophilus has also been evaluated. Preliminary clinical research shows that eating yogurt 125 mL daily enriched with L. acidophilus for 2 months might slightly decrease the incidence of recurrent bacterial vaginosis (1245). L. acidophilus has also been investigated in an oral formulation in combination with other probiotics. Clinical research in patients with bacterial vaginosis cured within the past 48 hours shows that taking a product containing L. acidophilus in combination with other probiotics results in recurrence of vaginosis in 18.3% of patients, a statistically significant reduction compared with 32.1% of those using placebo. The mean time to recurrence was approximately 23 days longer in patients taking the lactobacilli. The product contained L. acidophilus 1.08 billion CFUs along with Lactobacillus crispatus LMG S-29995 and Levilactobacillus brevis (Lactogyn, Vésale Pharma, Belgium), and was taken twice daily for 7 days and then once daily for up to an additional 120 days (110950).
Helicobacter pylori. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus, usually in combination with other probiotics, seems to improve H. pylori eradication when used along with standard therapies. It is unclear if heat-killed L. acidophilus is beneficial for H. pylori eradication. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical studies utilizing probiotic products containing L. acidophilus shows that these products can improve H. pylori eradication rates 1.14- to 1.24-fold when taken in combination with triple therapy consisting of a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin, and amoxicillin. Based on these results, about 7-11 patients would need to be treated in order for one additional patient to achieve complete remission (95394). Only one of the trials in this analysis investigated L. acidophilus alone; an additional 8 used L. acidophilus in combination with other probiotics. Individual clinical trials have shown that a combination of L. acidophilus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Bacillus subtilis 30 million colony-forming units (CFUs) total, taken in three divided doses daily, from 2 weeks prior tol 2 weeks after triple therapy increases H. pylori eradication when compared with triple therapy alone (90248). In children, a combination of L. acidophilus (strain 5) 94 million CFUs and Bifidobacterium bifidum (strain 12) 8.6 million CFUs in combination with a PPI, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin or metronidazole has been used daily for 2 weeks, followed by the probiotics alone for an additional 4 weeks (90602). However, other individual clinical trials have shown that L. acidophilus in combination with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Streptococcus faecium may not improve eradication rates when taken with triple therapy consisting of furazolidone, tetracycline, and lansoprazole (90279). Also, taking L. acidophilus along with six other probiotics in conjunction with bismuth quadruple therapy does not seem to improve H. pylori eradication rates when compared with placebo and bismuth quadruple therapy (90291). Also, taking L. acidophilus and L. casei without any standard H. pylori therapy does not improve H. pylori eradication rates in adults (12766). Heat-killed L. acidophilus has also been investigated in adults with H. pylori. Taking a lyophilized and inactivated culture of L. acidophilus (Lacteol Fort) containing 5 billion cells, 3 times daily for 10 days, modestly increases the eradication rate in patients using triple therapy of rabeprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin for 7 days (8562).
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Some research shows that oral live Lactobacillus acidophilus, taken alone or in combination with other probiotics, may be beneficial for IBS. The effects of non-viable, heat-killed L. acidophilus are unclear. Details: Clinical research in adults with IBS shows that taking L. acidophilus DDS-1 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 6 weeks modestly reduces the severity of abdominal pain when compared with placebo. Also, 52% of patients experienced a more than 30% reduction in pain severity, compared with 16% of those taking placebo. There were also improvements in abdominal distention and duration of pain; however, there were no changes in bowel habits (107581). A meta-analysis shows that taking L. acidophilus improves the rate of symptom relief and reduces bloating severity when compared with placebo. However, other symptoms were not improved (110866). L. acidophilus has also been examined in combination with other probiotics. One clinical study shows that taking a specific combination product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) containing L. acidophilus and 7 other species as 450 billion CFUs daily in two divided doses for 8 weeks improves abdominal bloating, but not abdominal pain, flatulence, or number of stools, in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) (11379). Another clinical study in patients with IBS-D shows that taking a specific multi-species probiotic (NordBiotic, MBM Biotix) containing L. acidophilus LA120, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LR110, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei LPC100, Lacticaseibacillus casei LC130, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP140, Bifidobacterium breve BB010, Bifidobacterium longum BL020, Bifidobacterium bifidum BF030, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BL040, and Streptococcus thermophilus ST250 as 2.5 billion CFUs total twice daily for 8 weeks improves overall symptom severity, as well as pain severity, pain frequency, and quality of life, when compared with placebo. Symptom severity was rated as mild by approximately 60% of those taking the probiotic mixture, compared with 30% of those taking placebo (107516). A small clinical trial shows that taking L. acidophilus NCFM plus Lactobacillus helveticus Lafti L10 (Lallemand Health Solutions) 5 billion CFUs each daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces flatus and overall symptoms, but not abdominal pain or bloating, when compared with taking placebo (111785). However, other probiotic compounds containing L. acidophilus have not demonstrated benefit in most patients with IBS. These include L. acidophilus NCFM 10 billion CFUs daily for 12 weeks; L. acidophilus, L. paracasei, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 (Cultura) 13-20 billion CFUs daily for 6 months; or L. acidophilus CL1285, L. casei LBC80R, and L. rhamnosus CLR2 50 billion CFUs each daily for 3 months (90236,94696,94697,95365,99789). Further research is needed to determine which IBS subtype, if any, is most likely to benefit. Heat-killed L. acidophilus has also been investigated in patients with IBS. One clinical study shows that taking capsules containing heat-killed L. acidophilus (Lacteol Fort) 20 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 6 weeks improves abdominal pain, bloating, and number and quality of stools when compared with placebo (7744). Also, in patients with IBS-D, observational research has found that use of heat-killed L. acidophilus (Lacteol LB) two capsules daily for one month modestly reduces pain and bloating and improves quality of life. The average weekly number of stools decreased by approximately 4.75. Also, the number of patients with watery stools was reduced from 54% at baseline to 19% (107535).

Atopic disease. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus does not seem to be beneficial for preventing atopic disease in children. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that administering L. acidophilus during pregnancy, when breastfeeding, or to newborn infants might actually increase the risk of atopic sensitization (90251). However, the number of studies included in this analysis was limited.

Acne. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A preliminary clinical study shows that taking a specific probiotic product containing L. acidophilus 5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus 5 billion CFUs, and Bifidobacterium bifidum 20 billion CFUs (Trenev Trio/Healthy Trinity, Natren) twice daily along with minocycline once every evening for 12 weeks improves inflamed and non-inflamed acne lesions in 82% of patients, compared to only 67% of patients treated with either the probiotic combination or minocycline alone (90270).
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in premature infants shows that taking 6 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus NCDO 1748 and Bifidobacterium bifidum NCDO 2203 (UFC Inforan, Switzerland) from 7 days of age until 34 weeks postmenstrual age or discharge does not reduce the odds of ARDS when compared with a control group of infants not given these probiotics. The infants in this study were born at less than 32 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111794). This study is limited by the lack of randomization to treatment group; placement was based on year of birth.
Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for allergic rhinitis prevention or treatment. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis shows that taking heat-treated milk fermented with L. acidophilus L-92 100 mL daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces nasal symptoms and mucus, but not ocular symptoms, when compared with taking an acidified placebo milk. The milk provided approximately 30 billion L. acidophilus cells (25488). The effect of L. acidophilus as a probiotic is unclear from this study. Other clinical research shows that drinking 250 mL of fermented milk containing L. acidophilus La-5 5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG 50 billion CFUs, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 50 billion CFUs from 36 weeks' gestation until 3 months postpartum does not reduce the incidence of allergic rhinitis in the child at 6 years of age when compared with placebo milk (96893).
Asthma. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus can improve lung function in people with asthma. Details: A small clinical crossover study in patients with moderate asthma shows that consuming live active yogurt 225 grams, providing L. acidophilus 760 million colony-forming units (CFUs) per gram, twice daily for 1 month does not affect measures of lung function when compared with yogurt not containing L. acidophilus. All yogurt contained Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (1244).
Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of the available clinical research shows that intake of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria-based probiotics during gestation, followed by giving the probiotic to the newborn for the first 2-6 months of life, reduces the risk of developing atopic dermatitis by 40% over the next 6-24 months when compared with placebo, regardless of family history of atopy. However, only four of 10 studies included in the analysis used L. acidophilus as part of the probiotic combination; the results from these individual, small studies support the overall findings of the meta-analysis (107503). Some clinical research also shows that supplementation with 250 mL of fermented milk containing L. acidophilus La-5, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 starting at 36 weeks' gestation and continuing until 3 months' postpartum, without supplementation in the infant, reduces the overall occurrence of atopic dermatitis in the child at 2 years of age. However, at 6 years of age, the effect appears to be inconclusive (96893). In children ages 1-3 years with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, taking 5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of a combination of L. acidophilus DDS-1 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis UABLA-12 along with fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) (DDS Junior) twice daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces symptom severity and the need for topical corticosteroids when compared with placebo (110995).
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One large observational study in premature infants suggests that taking L. acidophilus 1 to 3 billion CFUs with Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis during the first month of life for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis was not associated with a reduced risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The infants in this study were born between 22-29 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111771).
Cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for cancer prevention or treatment, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
Canker sores. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A systematic review and meta-analysis of mainly small and preliminary clinical trials shows that taking lactobacilli probiotics has a small effect on pain from canker sores. However, the dose and duration of probiotic and the specific species, as well as endpoints and results from individual studies, are mixed. One small study shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis reduces pain, but not the number of lesions or healing time, when compared with placebo. Another study shows that using lozenges providing inulin 0.13 gram along with L. acidophilus and B. animalis subsp. lactis 1.5 billion colony-forming units each reduces pain, but does not affect ulcer size or healing, when compared with Oracure gel (105146). Many of the individual studies may have been underpowered to detect a difference between groups.
Cholestasis. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in premature infants shows that the risk of developing cholestasis is reduced from 22% to 6% in those given a blend of L. acidophilus, bifidobacteria, and Enterococcus faecalis (Peifeikang powder, Shanghai Xinyi Pharmaceutical Company) at least 5 million colony-forming units three times daily, from birth until implementation of total parenteral nutrition, when compared with infants not given this powder. In the infants that developed cholestasis, the severity was reduced, resulting in a reduction in the rate of cholestatic liver injury, feeding intolerance, and necrotizing enterocolitis. The number of days to reach full enteral feeding, days to normal weight gain, and days of hospitalization were reduced by approximately 2.8, 2.1, and 1.7 days, respectively (103448).
Clostridioides difficile infection. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for preventing C. difficile occurrence or recurrence. Details: Current guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) state that there is insufficient information to recommend administration of probiotics for the primary prevention of C. difficile-associated diarrhea (107538). Evidence from clinical and observational research investigating the effect of L. acidophilus on C. difficile occurrence or recurrence is weak. Most studies use this species in combination with one or more additional probiotic species, including as Bio-K+ CI1285, containing L. acidophilus CL1285 and L. casei LBC80R, and as Bio-K+ 50 Billion, containing L. acidophilus CL1285, Lacticaseibacillus casei LBC80R, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CLR2 (25494,90231,90934,95369,95403,107529). Observational research has found that providing the Bio-K+ 50 Billion product as 50-100 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 5 days to patients who are on antibiotics for at least 2 days reduces the hospital-wide incidence of C. difficile by approximately 40%. The incidence rate was decreased by at least 50% in the highest risk individuals taking this combination (107529).
Colic. Oral inactivated Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One clinical study in infants with colic shows that giving a specific multi-ingredient product (Colimil Plus, Milte Italia SPA) containing inactivated L. acidophilus 1 billion colony-forming units, lemon balm 65 mg, and German chamomile 9 mg twice daily for 4 weeks reduces crying time similarly to Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 100 million CFUs daily (96278). It is unclear how L. acidophilus compares with no treatment.
Common cold. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in school children shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum (Infloran, Berna) 1 billion colony-forming units each twice daily for 3 months reduces the absolute percentage of school absence due to cold symptoms by 30% when compared with placebo (90286).
Constipation. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that stool frequency is increased and symptoms of functional constipation in adults are improved with the use of a specific combination product (Hexbio) providing L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis 30 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) twice daily for 7 days (90266). However, most other probiotic compounds containing L. acidophilus have not demonstrated benefit in most patients with constipation. One small clinical trial shows that taking yogurt 180 mL providing L. acidophilus NCFM, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019, and polydextrose (Litesse) daily for 2 weeks modestly improves clinical response and reduces transit time when compared with taking a control yogurt. However, there was no effect on the number of daily bowel movements (90275). Other studies show that taking Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 6.6 billion CFUs daily for 4 weeks in combination with Bifidobacterium longum UABl-14, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis UABla-12, Bifidobacterium bifidum UABb-10, and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) 7 mg does not improve symptoms of constipation when compared with a placebo providing FOS (110970). Also, there was a general lack of support for symptom improvement following the intake of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM 10 billion CFUs daily with Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Lpc-37 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis strains Bl-04, Bi-07, and HN019 daily for 2 weeks (110979).
Critical illness (trauma). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in critically ill, hospitalized adults shows that taking L. acidophilus LA-5 1.75 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 500 million CFUs, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB12 1.75 billion CFUs, and Saccharomyces boulardii 1.5 billion CFUs twice daily for 15 days modestly reduces the risk of sepsis, as well as the length of stay in the ICU and hospital, when compared with placebo (107524).
Denture stomatitis. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for denture stomatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
Depression. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with major depression shows that taking L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum daily for 8 weeks reduces symptoms of depression measured on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) when compared with placebo (99780). However, the validity of the results from this study is limited by incomplete reporting. For example, patient baseline BDI scores were not reported.
Diabetes. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus in combination with other probiotic species seems to be beneficial for the treatment of gestational diabetes, although it is unclear if it is beneficial for treatment of type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Oral L. acidophilus is unlikely to be beneficial for the prevention of gestational diabetes. Details: Although some individual studies disagree, meta-analyses of clinical research in patients with gestational diabetes show that taking probiotics, most often L. acidophilus in combination with other species, improves glycemic indices such as fasting blood glucose and insulin sensitivity when compared with placebo (102288,104156). Also, one meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking probiotics specifically containing L. acidophilus in combination with other species modestly improves these glycemic indices, as well as levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides, but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (111796). Some doses used in available studies include a combination of freeze-dried L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum each as 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) per gram daily for 6 weeks (95416,98430), a total of 4 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus LA-5, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12, Streptococcus thermophilus STY-31, and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus LBY-27 for 8 weeks starting at 24-28 weeks' gestation (96892), and a specific product containing L. acidophilus and 7 other probiotics (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) as a total of 112.5 billion CFUs twice daily for 8 weeks (107549). Meta-analyses in patients with gestational diabetes show that taking probiotics such as L. acidophilus does not reduce the risk for caesarean section birth, neonatal hypoglycemia, large for gestational age birth, or hypertensive disorders such as pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, or eclampsia (102288,104156,111796). However, one meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking probiotics specifically containing L. acidophilus modestly reduces neonatal birth weight, but not maternal weight gain (111796). Taking L. acidophilus does not seem to be effective for PREVENTING gestational diabetes. A large clinical trial shows that taking L. acidophilus LA1 7.5 billion CFUs, Bifidobacterium longum sp54 cs 1.5 billion CFUs, and Bifidobacterium bifidum sp9 cs 6 billion CFUs daily from 14-24 weeks' gestation does not reduce the incidence of gestational diabetes when compared with taking placebo (107520). Research on the use of L. acidophilus for type 2 diabetes is mixed. Taking a combination of L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Streptococcus thermophilus daily for 12 weeks does not reduce levels of fasting blood glucose or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) when compared with placebo (107521). One clinical study shows that taking L. acidophilus along with six other probiotic strains (Familact) daily for 6 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose, but does not affect plasma insulin, when compared with placebo (99790). A small clinical trial shows that taking fermented goat milk 120 grams containing one billion CFUs each of L. acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 daily for 6 weeks modestly reduces levels of HbA1c and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, but not fasting blood glucose or insulin resistance, when compared with conventional fermented milk containing Streptococcus thermophilus TA-40 (110973). However, other clinical research shows that taking L. acidophilus 1 billion CFUs, along with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Bacillus coagulans GanedenBC30 (GBI-30, 6086), and fructo-oligosaccharides 500 mg daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces fasting blood glucose and insulin and improves measures of insulin resistance when compared with placebo (107731). Another clinical trial shows that taking yogurt 200 grams daily containing L. acidophilus 4.65 million CFUs per gram along with Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis modestly reduces levels of HbA1c, triglyceride, and LDL cholesterol, but not fasting glucose, when compared with a placebo yogurt (111798). A combination probiotic containing L. acidophilus has also been evaluated in children 2-12 years of age with new-onset type 1 diabetes. One clinical study shows that taking a specific combination product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) providing 112.5 billion CFUs daily for 3 months modestly decreases HbA1c and insulin requirements when compared with placebo. Also, about three times as many children achieved remission, defined as insulin requirements of less than 0.5 U/kg daily and HbA1c less than 7%. However, C-peptide levels and the maintenance of residual pancreatic beta-cell function were not affected when compared with placebo (107497).
Diabetic nephropathy. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with diabetic nephropathy not taking antidiabetes drugs shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Streptococcus thermophilus daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces the ratio of microalbuminuria/creatinine (mAlb/Cr), a marker of kidney damage, when compared with placebo. However, there was no effect on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (107521).
Diarrhea. Oral heat-killed L. acidophilus seems to reduce the duration of diarrhea in adults and children. Oral live L. acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children with dysentery being treated with ceftriaxone shows that taking a specific combination probiotic sachet (Kidilact, Zisttakhmir Company) containing live L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, Bifidobacterium breve, and Streptococcus thermophilus daily for 5 days modestly reduces the duration of diarrhea, hospitalization, and blood in diarrhea when compared with control (102417). Heat-killed L. acidophilus has also been investigated for the treatment of diarrhea. A meta-analysis of four small clinical studies in infants and children ages 1 month to 4 years shows that taking heat-killed L. acidophilus LB 20-30 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for up to 5 days along with oral or intravenous rehydration therapy can modestly reduce the duration of diarrhea, primarily of non-rotaviral origin (90295). Also, preliminary clinical research in patients with functional chronic diarrhea shows that taking heat-killed L. acidophilus LB (Lacteol Fort, Laboratoire du Lacteol du Dr Boucard) as two capsules twice daily for a total of 20 billion cells daily for 4 weeks reduces daily stool frequency by 3.5, compared with a reduction of 1.2 in patients taking five chewable capsules three times daily of an unspecified strain of L. acidophilus (Lacidophilin, Tai Ge Pharma Ltd). Stool consistency, pain, distention, and total efficacy, defined as a decrease in mean symptoms by at least 40%, were also further improved in patients taking the heat-killed product (107537). However, other clinical research in children ages 6 months to 12 years hospitalized with acute diarrhea shows that taking 15 billion heat-killed L. acidophilus (Lactrol, Raptakos) cells daily for 3 days along with oral rehydration solution (ORS) does not have beneficial effects on duration of diarrhea, frequency of stools, or length of hospital stay, when compared with ORS alone (111789). The European Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases recommends probiotics in hospitalized children with diarrhea (98469) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommends probiotics for the outpatient treatment of acute diarrhea (95388) However, L. acidophilus is not a specific focus of the guidelines and most evidence is low quality.
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients newly diagnosed with GAD shows that taking sertraline 25 mg plus probiotics daily for 8 weeks may modestly reduce some symptoms of anxiety when compared with sertraline alone. However, the reduction in anxiety score was small and change was not consistent between rating scales. Also, the quality of life was not improved. The probiotics provided a total of 18 billion colony-forming units of L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (110977).
Hepatic encephalopathy. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for hepatic encephalopathy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
HIV/AIDS. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for HIV/AIDS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for lowering cholesterol levels; the available research is conflicting. Details: Two meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking fermented milk products containing L. acidophilus can reduce total cholesterol by about 14-19 mg/dL in adults with or without hypercholesterolemia. However, the effect of L. acidophilus on both total and LDL cholesterol levels is conflicting from available research (95396,95397,95399). Clinical trials included in these meta-analyses evaluated patients with hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), metabolic syndrome, and others. Taking L. acidophilus does not appear to improve high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol or triglyceride levels (95396,95397,95399). Doses used in some studies have included fermented milk products providing L. acidophilus 39 million to 2 billion CFUs daily, alone or along with other probiotic species, for up to 6 weeks (95396). One small clinical trial in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking L. acidophilus LA-1 60 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) three times daily for 6 weeks does not affect serum lipids when compared with taking placebo (111791). A meta-analysis of nine small to moderate-sized clinical studies shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis reduces levels of total cholesterol when compared with placebo (107591). However, it is unclear if this is due to L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, or their combination.
Hypertension. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for hypertension, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small preliminary clinical trial in patients with collagenous colitis shows that taking 10 billion colony-forming units each of L. acidophilus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. lactis BB-12 twice daily for 12 weeks does not increase the proportion of patients with a reduction in weekly bowel frequency of at least 50% when compared with placebo. Also, there was no effect of this combination on stool consistency or abdominal symptoms. However, there were some modest benefits when compared with baseline (110999). This study was small and may have been underpowered to detect differences.
Intraventricular hemorrhage. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in premature infants shows that taking 6 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus NCDO 1748 and Bifidobacterium bifidum NCDO 2203 (UFC Inforan, Switzerland) from 7 days of age until 34 weeks postmenstrual age or discharge does not reduce the odds of intraventricular hemorrhage when compared with a control group of infants not given these probiotics. The infants in this study were born at less than 32 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111794). This study is limited by the lack of randomization to treatment group; placement was based on year of birth.
Lactose intolerance. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for lactose intolerance. Details: One small clinical trial shows that consuming 400 mL of a non-fermented milk product containing L. acidophilus 530 million colony-forming units (CFUs)/mL daily does not reduce symptoms of lactose intolerance or hydrogen breath test results when compared with milk without L. acidophilus (16737). Another small preliminary clinical trial shows that taking L. acidophilus BG2FO4 10 billion CFUs twice daily for 7 days does not reduce lactose-induced gastrointestinal symptoms or improve lactose digestion based on breath hydrogen when compared with baseline (111783). However, another clinical trial shows that adding various L. acidophilus strains 800 million to 1 billion CFUs/mL to non-fermented milk improves hydrogen breath tests in patients with lactose intolerance (16738).
Lyme disease. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
Metabolic syndrome. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in elderly patients with metabolic syndrome shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus PBS066-DSM 24,936, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum PBS067-DSM 24,937, and Limosilactobacillus reuteri PBS072-DSM 25,175 as 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) each, with inulin and fructo-oligosaccharides daily for 60 days, reduces the number of patients diagnosed with metabolic syndrome by 23%, compared with a 10% reduction in those taking placebo. In the probiotic group, there were modest improvements in waist circumference and levels of fasting plasma insulin, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and inflammatory mediators when compared with placebo. However, there were no significant differences between groups for fasting blood glucose or blood pressure. All patients in this study were on a Mediterranean-like standard diet (107560).
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial or safe for NEC prevention. Details: Most meta-analyses of clinical research show that giving lactobacilli enterally reduces the risk of NEC and/or severe NEC in preterm, mainly very low birth weight (VLBW), infants. Some meta-analyses support the use of lactobacilli in combination with bifidobacteria, as opposed to lactobacilli alone for reducing the risk of NEC. However, only a small number of the individual studies included in these analyses have investigated the effects of L. acidophilus, which was used as part of a combination probiotic and/or prebiotic product in all cases (95344,95351,103437,103445,104157,105162,105164). Also, guidance among regulatory agencies and clinical organizations varies with respect to the use of probiotics in very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns that preterm infants given probiotics are at risk of serious infections caused by the bacteria or fungi contained in probiotics due to cases reported in this group of infants (111610). Also, The American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to preterm infants, particularly those with a birth weight below 1000 grams, due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy and potential for harm in this vulnerable population (111608). The Canadian Paediatric Society, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition state that probiotic combinations may be of benefit in reducing the incidence of NEC in preterm neonates over 1000 grams. However, L. acidophilus is not specifically recommended (103003,111609,111611).
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In children with NAFLD, clinical research shows that taking a specific combination product (Prokid, Gostaresh Milad Pouya Company) containing L. acidophilus ATCC B3208 3 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus DSMZ 21690 2 billion CFUs, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis DSMZ 32269 6 billion CFUs, and Bifidobacterium bifidum ATCC SD6576 2 billion CFUs daily for 12 weeks normalizes liver sonography findings in 53% of children, compared with 17% of those taking placebo. In addition, levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) are reduced by 30% and 25%, respectively. There was no effect on body mass index or blood lipids when compared with placebo (105156). Another clinical trial shows that taking two sachets daily for 3 months of a specific combination product (VSL#3) containing L. acidophilus and other probiotics modestly decreases triglyceride levels and liver enzymes when compared with taking placebo. However, there was no change in body mass index or most glycemic or lipid parameters (111009). However, taking L. acidophilus in combination with other probiotics does not seem to be beneficial in adults with NAFLD. Clinical research shows that taking yogurt 100 grams, containing L. acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 40 million CFUs and vitamin D 1000 IU, daily for 3 months does not improve fasting blood glucose levels, insulin levels, blood pressure, or anthropometric indices when compared with unfortified yogurt (105174). Also, a small clinical trial shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus BCMC 12,130, Lacticaseibacillus casei BCMC 12,313, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis BCMC 12,451, Bifidobacterium bifidum BCMC 02290, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis BCMC 02129, and Bifidobacterium longum BCMC 02120 30 billion colony-forming units twice daily for 6 months has no beneficial effects on hepatic steatosis or fibrosis or on levels of liver enzymes, blood lipids, or fasting glucose, when compared with placebo (107523).
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with NASH shows that taking 1 billion colony-forming units each of L. acidophilus ATCC SD5221 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019 daily for 6 months does not have beneficial effects on severity of liver fibrosis or steatosis, metabolic markers, or inflammation when compared with taking placebo. The effect of this combination on liver enzymes was mixed (111797).
Obesity. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In combination with Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BS01, taking L. acidophilus LA02 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 6 weeks does not reduce body weight or body fat when compared with placebo in young, healthy females, only some of whom were overweight (103438). However, another clinical study shows that taking 50 billion CFUs of a specific combination of L. acidophilus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and B. animalis subsp. lactis (Lab4P) for 24 weeks reduces body weight by an additional 1.3 kg more than placebo (103439).
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In patients with PCOS, clinical research shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus T16 (IBRC-M10785), Lacticaseibacillus casei T2 (IBRC-M10783), and Bifidobacterium bifidum T1 (IBRC-M10771) 2 billion colony-forming units each, plus inulin 800 mg, daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces serum insulin and triglyceride levels and improves insulin resistance and insulin sensitivity when compared with placebo. However, it does not alter cholesterol or fasting glucose levels (105159). Another clinical trial shows that 31.3% of patients with PCOS taking L. acidophilus in combination with other probiotics daily for 6 months had regular menstrual cycles compared with 12.5% of those taking placebo. There were also modest improvements in testosterone levels and waist circumference, but not other hormones, insulin resistance, body weight, or most measures of quality of life. The product provided Lactobacillus acidophilus UBLA-34 2 billion CFUs along with Bifidobacterium bifidum UBBB-55, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum UBLP-40, Lacticaseibacillus casei UBLC-42, Limosilactobacillus fermentum UBLF-31, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus UBLR-58, Limosilactobacillus reuteri UBLRu-87, and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) daily for 2 months and then twice daily for 4 months. All patients also underwent dietary and lifestyle changes (110974).
Postoperative infection. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for preventing postoperative infections, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lactobacillus for this purpose.
Pouchitis. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Continuous oral treatment for one year with a specific concentrated formulation of L. acidophilus and other probiotics (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) as 6 grams (300-500 billion live bacteria per gram), daily for up 12 months seems to maintain remission of pouchitis in 85% of patients (6087,12769). Also, one small clinical study shows that taking a specific product (Trilac, Allergon AB) containing L. acidophilus 600 million colony-forming units (CFUs) per capsule, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus 400 million CFUs per capsule, and Bifidobacterium bifidum 600 million CFUs per capsule, taken in doses of two capsules three times daily for 9 months, can reduce pouchitis severity and the number of patients experiencing pouchitis when compared to baseline (90296). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small preliminary clinical trial shows that taking probiotics during pregnancy reduces the severity and duration of nausea and vomiting by 16% to 54%. There was also a small benefit on stool hardness. A specific probiotic (Probiotics 10, Nature's Bounty) was taken as 2 capsules daily for two back-to-back cycles of six days with probiotics and two days without. Each capsule contained a total of 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of L. acidophilus La-14, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 299v and DSM 15312, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus Lb-87, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei DSM 13434 and Lpc-37, Ligilactobacillus salivarius Ls-33, Levilactobacillus brevis Lbr-35, Lacticaseibacillus casei Lc-11, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bl-04, along with inulin 200 mg (107199).
Prematurity. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In premature infants, clinical research shows that taking a blend of L. acidophilus, bifidobacteria, and Enterococcus faecalis (Peifeikang powder, Shanghai Xinyi Pharmaceutical Company), at least 5 million colony-forming units (CFUs) three times daily from birth until implementation of total parenteral nutrition, reduces the rate of development of extrauterine growth retardation from 15% to 8% when compared with those not receiving this blend (103448). Other preliminary clinical research in premature infants shows that taking 6 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus NCDO 1748 and Bifidobacterium bifidum NCDO 2203 (UFC Inforan, Switzerland) from 7 days of age until 34 weeks postmenstrual age or discharge reduces the odds of neurodevelopment impairment at 24 months corrected age by 70% when compared with a control group of infants not given these probiotics. The odds of having moderate to severe impairment were also reduced. The infants in this study were born at less than 32 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111794). This study is limited by the lack of randomization to treatment group; placement was based on year of birth. Observational research has also been conducted. One large observational study in infants fed strictly human milk, but not strictly formula or a combination, suggests that taking L. acidophilus 1 to 3 billion CFUs with Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis during the first month of life for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis was associated with a modest increased weight gain velocity. The infants in this study were born between 22-29 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111771).
Psoriasis. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with psoriasis shows that taking a mixture of probiotics for 8 weeks modestly improves overall symptoms and feelings of depression when compared with placebo. The percentage of patients achieving at least a 50% or 75% reduction in overall symptom score was 40% and 24%, respectively, in those taking the probiotic mixture, compared with 16% and 8% of those taking placebo. Each probiotic capsule was used twice daily and provided a total daily dose of 2.6 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, and Bifidobacterium longum (107498).
Radiation-induced diarrhea. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with cervical cancer receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy shows that taking a specific product (Biogurt, Fame Pharmaceuticals) containing L. acidophilus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 as 1.75 billion lyophilized colony-forming units (CFUs) as a capsule three times daily throughout treatment reduces the risk of diarrhea by 28% when compared with placebo. The treatment group also used less loperamide (102285). Another small clinical trial in patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy with weekly cisplatin shows that taking L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum (Infloran, Laboratio Farmaceutico SIT) as 1 billion CFUs each, twice daily from seven days before starting radiotherapy and continuing during radiotherapy, reduces the incidence of moderate to severe diarrhea and the need for antidiarrheal medication when compared with placebo. Moderate to severe diarrhea occurred in 9% of patients using the probiotics, compared with 45% of those taking placebo (107580).
Respiratory tract infections. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in children ages 3-5 years who attend daycare centers shows that taking a combination milk product containing 5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) each of L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis (HOWARU Protect, Danisco) reduces the risk of experiencing fever, cough, and rhinorrhea by 45% when compared with placebo. Patients taking this combination experienced an average 2-day shorter duration of symptoms and were significantly less likely to use an antibiotic for their symptoms. Patients who took L. acidophilus without bifidobacterium also had a reduction in fever, cough, and use of antibiotics, but not rhinorrhea (16847). In healthy children aged 3-10 years, clinical research shows that taking 12.5 billion CFUs daily of a specific combination of L. acidophilus CUL21 and CUL60, Bifidobacterium bifidum CUL20, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis CUL34 (Lab4), and vitamin C 50 mg daily reduces the risk of cough by 16% and sore throat by 20%, and modestly reduces school absenteeism and antibiotic use when compared with placebo. However, nasal symptoms, fever, and wheezing were not reduced (106943). A different combination product containing L. acidophilus DDS-1 1 billion CFUs and B. animalis subsp. lactis UABLA-12 4 billion CFUs (Up4-Junior, UAS Laboratories) with fructo-oligosaccharides 50 mg has also been evaluated. Clinical research in children 3-12 years of age with a sick household member shows that taking this product daily for 2 weeks modestly shortens the duration of respiratory infections, but does not reduce the risk of developing an infection, when compared with placebo (98439). In overweight adults or adults with obesity, taking 50 billion CFUs of a specific combination of L. acidophilus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, B. bifidum, and B. animalis subsp. lactis (Lab4P) for 24 weeks reduces the overall likelihood of having upper respiratory tract infection symptoms, such as sneezing, cough, and blocked nose, by approximately 40% when compared with placebo (103439).
Retinopathy of prematurity. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in premature infants shows that taking 6 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus NCDO 1748 and Bifidobacterium bifidum NCDO 2203 (UFC Inforan, Switzerland) from 7 days of age until 34 weeks postmenstrual age or discharge does not reduce the odds of retinopathy of prematurity when compared with a control group of infants not given these probiotics. The infants in this study were born at less than 32 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111794). This study is limited by the lack of randomization to treatment group; placement was based on year of birth. Also, one large observational study in premature infants suggests that taking L. acidophilus 1 to 3 billion CFUs with Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis during the first month of life for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis was not associated with a reduced risk of retinopathy of prematurity. The infants in this study were born between 22-29 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111771).
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study in patients with moderate-to-severe RA shows that taking capsules containing freeze-dried strains of L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum daily for 8 weeks does not improve RA severity, the number of tender or swollen joints, or joint pain when compared with placebo (95418).
Rotaviral diarrhea. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for rotaviral diarrhea. Details: One preliminary clinical study shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus AD031 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) and Bifidobacterium longum BORI 20 billion CFUs twice daily for 3 days reduces the duration of rotaviral diarrhea by an average of 3 days when compared with placebo (95334). However, one clinical study using a lower dose and different strain of L. acidophilus (La-14) 200 million CFUs twice daily for 5 days shows that this regimen does not reduce the duration of watery diarrhea or affect the viral load in children aged 9 months to 5 years with confirmed norovirus or rotavirus infection (96887). A small clinical study shows that heat-killed L. acidophilus LB 20-30 billion cells daily for up to 4 days can modestly reduce the duration of diarrhea in infants and children, some of which had confirmed rotavirus (90295).
Sepsis. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in premature infants shows that taking 6 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus NCDO 1748 with Bifidobacterium bifidum NCDO 2203 (UFC Inforan, Switzerland) from 7 days of age until 34 weeks postmenstrual age or discharge reduces the odds of late onset sepsis by 55% when compared with a control group of infants not given these probiotics. The infants in this study were born at less than 32 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111794). This study is limited by the lack of randomization to treatment group; placement was based on year of birth. One large observational study in infants fed a mix of human milk and formula, but not strictly human milk or formula, suggests that taking L. acidophilus 1 to 3 billion CFUs with Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis during the first month of life for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis was associated with a 31% reduction in the development of clinical sepsis. The infants in this study were born between 22-29 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111771).
Short bowel syndrome. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for short bowel syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lactobacillus for this condition.
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children with chronic diarrhea due to SIBO shows that taking a combination of lyophilized L. acidophilus 1.5 grams and Lacticaseibacillus casei 1.5 grams by mouth twice daily for 21 days decreases average daily stools by 1.5, but does not improve other symptoms, when compared with placebo (91143). Also, one preliminary clinical study shows that taking a total of 2 billion CFUs of L. acidophilus and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (Lacidofil) daily for 4 weeks does not prevent the development of SIBO in children that started treatment with omeprazole 20 mg daily for epigastric pain (90262).
Travelers' diarrhea. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for the prevention of travelers' diarrhea. Details: A meta-analysis which included three clinical studies evaluating the use of L. acidophilus in adults traveling to different parts of the world found no benefit for the prevention of travelers' diarrhea when compared with placebo (101445). The effectiveness of this species may vary significantly based upon the destination of travel. Destinations in the same country can have different results, probably due to differences in bacteria and other microorganisms at different locations (10216).
Ulcerative colitis. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: The best evidence of benefit is for a specific combination product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma). Doses of 3 grams (equivalent to 900 billion colony-forming units (CFUs)) once or twice daily have been used in combination with conventional treatment. In children aged 1-16 years, doses of 450-1800 billion CFUs for up to one year have been used (3261,14370,14371,16841,95337). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking this product as an adjunct to standard ulcerative colitis treatment can increase remission rates in adults and children by about 1.7-fold when compared with standard treatment alone (95337). Preliminary clinical research in patients with moderate to severe symptoms taking mesalazine 1200 mg daily shows that taking an unknown dose of L. acidophilus twice daily along with Bifidobacterium bifidum BGN4 and Ligilactobacillus salivarius (Acronelle, Bromatech srl, Milan, Italy) for 2 years modestly improves patient- and physician-scales of overall symptoms when compared with taking mesalazine alone. There were also improvements in stool frequency and rectal bleeding (110981). Although some contradictory evidence exists (3261,16841), most research shows that taking Visbiome or a combination of L. acidophilus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 (Probio-Tec AB-25) does not prevent relapse in people who are already in remission (95337,95338).
Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In children aged 4 months to 5 years with a previous UTI, clinical research shows that taking a specific combination of L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (Complete Probiotic Platinum) for 18 months increases the median time to the first incidence of recurrence by approximately 3 months and increases the percentage of children without a UTI during the study period from 83% to 97% (103436).
Vaginal candidiasis. It is unclear if oral or intravaginal Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for vaginal candidiasis. Details: In a small preliminary clinical trial in patients with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis who had undergone a week of oral fluconazole treatment followed by intravaginal L. acidophilus LA 02 and Limosilactobacillus fermentum LF10, 72.4% of patients demonstrated a lack of clinical recurrence over a 7 month observational period. All patients took fluconazole 200 mg three times in the first week followed by intravaginal application with at least 0.4 billion colony-forming units each of L. acidophilus LA 02 and Limosilactobacillus fermentum LF10, along with arabinogalactan and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) on alternate days for 10 days and then once weekly for 10 weeks (111781). However, a combination of L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii, and Streptococcus thermophilus (Femilac) given intravaginally, does not seem to reduce the risk of vaginal candidiasis infection following use of antibiotics (12108). There is also some evidence that eating yogurt enriched with L. acidophilus daily does not reduce the risk of recurrent vaginal candidiasis (1245).
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking L. acidophilus LA-5 1.75 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 500 million CFUs, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB12 1.75 billion CFUs, and Saccharomyces boulardii 1.5 billion CFUs twice daily for 15 days reduces the risk of VAP to 12%, compared with 28% in those taking placebo. Half of the dose was given onto the oropharynx and half via a nasogastric tube (107524). More evidence is needed to rate Lactobacillus acidophilus for these uses.

PECTIN

Hypercholesterolemia. Most clinical research shows that oral pectin at a dose of 15 grams daily can slightly lower total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Details: While some small studies in patients with or without hypercholesterolemia suggest that pectin 1-12 grams daily for up to 12 weeks does not reduce lipid levels (2215,2217), other research in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking pectin 15 grams daily for 4 weeks consistently reduces total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol by around 7% to 10% when compared with baseline or placebo (2214,2216,92473). Some forms of pectin might lower cholesterol levels better than others. Pectin with a higher molecular weight and higher degree of esterification appears to be the most effective (92473). A larger clinical study also shows that taking 20 grams of pectin and guar gum, along with small amounts of insoluble fiber, reduces total cholesterol by nearly 8% and LDL cholesterol by nearly 11%, but does not improve high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol or triglycerides, when compared with placebo (12547).

Colorectal cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral pectin for the prevention of colorectal cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pectin for this purpose.
Diarrhea. It is unclear if oral pectin is beneficial in children with persistent diarrhea. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 5-12 months in developing nations with persistent diarrhea shows that taking pectin 4 grams/kg reduces the duration of diarrhea and vomiting, and reduces the need for oral rehydration solution and intravenous fluid, when compared with a rice-diet control (12575). Pectin has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. One clinical study in children aged 6 months to 6 years with acute diarrhea shows that taking a combination of apple pectin and chamomile (Diarrhoesan, Dr. Loges + Co. GmbH) for up to 5 days reduces the frequency of stools by day 3 by about 1.36-fold when compared with placebo, with improvements maintained through day 5. This combination product was given hourly up to a maximum dose of 50 mL in children 6-12 months of age, 60 mL in children 1-3 years of age, and 80 mL in children 4-6 years of age (19705). It is unclear if these findings are due to pectin, chamomile, or the combination.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). It is unclear if oral pectin is beneficial in children with GERD. Details: A small clinical study in children with GERD and cerebral palsy shows that adding pectin to enteral nutrition in a 1:2 ratio for 4 weeks might reduce some symptoms of GERD. The number of vomiting episodes per week was reduced by 60% and the frequency of coughing/wheezing was reduced by 76% for children given the pectin diet when compared with those given a non-pectin diet (92476).
Impaired glucose tolerance (Prediabetes). It is unclear if oral pectin is beneficial in patients with impaired glucose tolerance. Details: A small clinical study in middle-aged patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose shows that drinking 400 mL of a beverage containing 40 grams/L of sugar beet pectin in two divided doses daily for 12 weeks does not improve fasting or postprandial plasma glucose concentrations or serum lipid levels when compared to baseline (34118).
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Although there has been interest in using oral pectin for IBS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pectin for this purpose.
Mercury toxicity. It is unclear if oral pectin is beneficial in patients with mercury toxicity. Details: A small clinical study in children with mercury poisoning shows that taking pectin 2.5 grams daily for 21 days and then 5 grams daily for 39 days increases mercury excretion in the urine, decreases the duration of mercury toxicity, and improves psychological symptoms when compared to baseline (31657). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
Niacin-induced flushing. It is unclear if oral pectin is beneficial for the prevention or management of niacin-induced flushing. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking apple pectin 2 grams 30 minutes prior to taking niacin extended-release 1000 mg reduces the duration of flushing by about 35 minutes when compared with placebo. However, apple pectin does not reduce the incidence of flushing, the time to flush, or the maximum severity of flushing (92477).
Peptic ulcers. It is unclear if oral pectin is beneficial for the prevention of peptic ulcers. Details: A small clinical study in patients with recently healed duodenal ulcers shows that taking apple pectin 10 grams twice daily for 6 months does not reduce the recurrence of duodenal ulcers when compared with placebo (31697).
Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral pectin is beneficial in patients with prostate cancer. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with prostate cancer show that taking a specific modified citrus pectin product (Pectasol, Econugenics) 4.8 grams three times daily following prostatectomy, radiation, or cryosurgery for up to one year slows disease progression and increases the time to prostate specific antigen (PSA) doubling when compared to baseline (15020,108525). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
Radiation exposure. Although there has been interest in using oral pectin to minimize exposure to environmental radiation, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pectin for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate pectin for these uses.

STRAWBERRY

(Read more about STRAWBERRY)

Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Pooled analyses of clinical research show that taking freeze-dried strawberry powder or eating fresh strawberries for 3-12 weeks can reduce levels of C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation and risk factor for CVD, by 0.47-0.63 mg/L when compared with placebo. These analyses report conflicting effects on blood pressure and lipid levels (103881,103882), with one analysis reporting small improvements that are not clinically significant (103881). It is unclear whether strawberry can prevent CVD or related outcomes.
Diabetes. Preliminary clinical research in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking freeze-dried strawberry powder 50 grams daily for 6 weeks reduces glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.47% compared to an increase of 0.15% with placebo. However, there were no changes in serum glucose, anthropometric measurements, blood lipids, or blood pressure. Also, the short duration of supplementation makes it unclear whether the change in HbA1c was due to strawberry (100113,100119).
Hyperlipidemia. Data on the effects of strawberry on serum lipids are conflicting. Clinical research in adults with abdominal obesity and elevated serum lipids shows that taking freeze-dried strawberry powder 50 grams daily for 12 weeks reduces total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when compared with either placebo or taking 25 grams of freeze-dried strawberry daily. In those taking 50 grams daily, levels of LDL cholesterol decreased by approximately 21% from baseline, compared with a 2% reduction in those taking placebo. However, strawberry did not improve levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol or triglycerides (100109). Another study also reported reduced levels of total and LDL cholesterol (112318), while others report no changes in any lipid levels (112320,112321). In a meta-analysis, strawberry was associated with mean decreases of 11 mg/dL in LDL levels, and 12 mg/dL in total cholesterol, as well as increases in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (112323).
Hypertension. Preliminary clinical research in postmenopausal women with pre- or stage I hypertension shows that taking freeze-dried strawberry powder 25 or 50 grams daily for 8 weeks does not reduce blood pressure when compared with placebo. However, over 50% of the included women were also taking at least one blood pressure lowering medication (100111).
Obesity. Clinical research in adults with obesity or abdominal obesity and elevated serum lipids shows that taking freeze-dried strawberry powder 50 grams daily for 12 weeks does not reduce body weight or adiposity when compared with either placebo or freeze-dried strawberries 25 grams daily (100109,100116). Similarly, preliminary clinical research in adults with type 2 diabetes who are overweight or obese shows that taking freeze-dried strawberry powder 50 grams daily for 6 weeks does not improve weight loss when compared with placebo (100113). Evidence from mainly small, lower-quality studies is mixed as to whether taking strawberries has beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk factors when compared to control in obese individuals (100109,100116,100118).
Osteoarthritis. Preliminary clinical research in obese adults with osteoarthritis shows that taking freeze-dried strawberry powder 50 grams daily for 12 weeks reduces some, but not all, measures of pain by up to 45%, compared to no change in those taking placebo (100116). More evidence is needed to rate strawberry for these uses.

VITAMIN D

EFFECTIVE

Familial hypophosphatemia. Oral vitamin D in combination with phosphate is effective for bone disorders in patients with familial hypophosphatemia. Details: Taking calcitriol or dihydrotachysterol orally in combination with phosphate supplements is effective for treating bone disorders in people with familial hypophosphatemia (11818).
Hypoparathyroidism. Oral vitamin D increases serum calcium concentrations in people with hypoparathyroidism or pseudohypoparathyroidism. Details: Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) is effective in high doses for increasing serum calcium concentrations in people with hypoparathyroidism or pseudohypoparathyroidism (11820). Also, taking vitamin D (form unspecified) or calcitriol postoperatively is effective for preventing hypocalcemia in people with hypoparathyroidism due to thyroidectomy (39045).
Osteomalacia. Oral vitamin D is effective for osteomalacia. Details: Oral calcifediol is effective for treating osteomalacia secondary to liver disease (hepatic osteodystrophy) and anticonvulsant-induced osteomalacia. Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) is effective for osteomalacia due to malabsorption syndromes, Fanconi syndrome, and corticosteroid-induced osteomalacia (11819,11821).
Renal osteodystrophy. Oral calcitriol prevents renal osteodystrophy in patients with chronic renal failure. Details: Taking calcitriol orally manages hypocalcemia and prevents renal osteodystrophy in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing dialysis (11823).
Rickets. Oral vitamin D prevents and treats rickets. Details: Vitamin D is effective for preventing and treating rickets, a consequence of vitamin D deficiency. Calcitriol should be used in patients with renal failure (11824). Clinical practice guidelines from the Endocrine Society conditionally recommend, based on low certainty of evidence, empiric vitamin D supplementation from vitamin D fortified foods, vitamin D supplements, or vitamin formulations that contain vitamin D to prevent nutritional rickets in children and adolescents aged 1 to 18 years. Empiric vitamin D supplementation is defined as supplementing with vitamin D above the Recommended Dietary Allowance without having tested serum vitamin D status (114502). A large clinical study in pregnant adults shows that taking vitamin D 28,000 IU weekly from the second trimester up to 6 months post-partum decreases the risk of biochemical rickets by about 84% in the offspring at 6-12 months of age when compared with placebo. However, taking vitamin D 4200, 16,800, or 28,000 IU weekly from the second trimester to delivery does not decrease the risk of rickets in the offspring when compared with placebo (114503).
Vitamin D deficiency. Oral vitamin D prevents and treats vitamin D deficiency. Details: Vitamin D is effective for preventing and treating vitamin D deficiency using a wide range of doses and dosing frequencies (7555,16888,16891,17476,115590). Optimal blood levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for maintaining bone density is controversial; however, it is typically estimated that blood levels of 20-100 ng/mL are needed. Toxicity usually does not occur until levels exceed 150 ng/mL (17476,93945). Vitamin D also alleviates symptoms and syndromes associated with vitamin D deficiency. Administering vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) intramuscularly or orally seems to help treat severe proximal myopathy associated with severe vitamin D deficiency. Several case reports suggest vitamin D therapy can provide prompt relief of muscle weakness and restore mobility (11923,84348,84687).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral vitamin D prevents corticosteroid-induced osteopenia and osteoporosis. Details: Taking calcifediol, cholecalciferol, calcitriol, or alfacalcidol orally prevents corticosteroid-induced osteopenia and osteoporosis (7555,83933). Vitamin D3 metabolites, including calcitriol and alfacalcidol, seem to be more effective at preventing bone loss compared to cholecalciferol in these patients, although the vitamin D3 metabolites seem to be inferior to bisphosphonates (83955). Furthermore, taking activated vitamin D or other forms of vitamin D alone or along with calcium improves bone mineral density in people with corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (38493,38581).
Osteoporosis. Adequate intake of vitamin D in conjunction with adequate calcium intake helps to prevent the progression of osteoporosis. It might also reduce the risk of a first fracture in some patients. However, its place in the prevention of secondary fracture is unclear. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate vitamin D intake of 800-1000 IU daily along with adequate calcium intake for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake, with a target serum vitamin D level of 30 ng/mL (109425). In the US, foods that contain at least 120 IU vitamin D can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate vitamin D intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (97001). However, vitamin D supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Clinical research shows that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) and calcium can decrease postmenopausal bone loss, improve bone density, help prevent osteoporosis, and decrease the risk of fractures (10932,12926,12930,12934,12952) (38973,39015,39026,84003,113584). According to one analysis, taking oral vitamin D3 700-800 IU daily with or without calcium reduces fracture risk in ambulatory and institutionalized elderly people (12933). Other analyses suggest that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol, ergocalciferol, calcifediol, calcitriol, or alfacalcidol with or without calcium can reduce the risk of all fractures by up to 17%, nonvertebral fractures by up to 49%, and hip fractures by up to 30% in older adults. However, the incidence of vertebral fractures does not appear to be reduced with vitamin D supplementation (38942,38970,38973,39015,39026,84660,109053). Despite the majority of research showing benefit, some studies have not found a positive effect of vitamin D on fracture risk. Some analyses of clinical evidence, including patients with and without osteoporosis, show that taking vitamin D3 or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) alone does not reduce fracture risk, suggesting that adequate calcium intake is needed for any benefit to be realized (39015,84471). Also, some evidence suggests that vitamin D3 400 IU daily is not effective for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in elderly nursing home residents (109053). Another clinical trial found that taking vitamin D3 800 IU daily with calcium 1200-1500 mg daily for 2 years does not increase bone mineral density (BMD) in Black postmenopausal adults. This may be due to the fact that Black females have a lower rate of bone remodeling, an increased calcium absorption efficiency, and reduced calcium excretion when compared with other ethnic groups; therefore, supplementation with vitamin D3 and calcium might not be as beneficial in these patients (16878). There is concern that vitamin D might not be effective for secondary prevention of fractures in elderly patients. A meta-analysis of clinical studies, including many studies cited above, and a large clinical study in elderly adults with a previous osteoporotic fracture show that taking vitamin D3 400-4000 IU daily or as a single dose up to 500,000 IU orally or injected annually with or without calcium 480-1200 mg daily for up to 5 years does not reduce the risk of hip, vertebral, or other fractures when compared with placebo or no treatment (13073,112486). Another study also shows that taking vitamin D3 800 IU and calcium 1000 mg daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (under 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). However, these studies have been criticized for failing to measure vitamin D levels and low adherence to study protocol (12931). Also, one of these studies did not use a placebo control (12929). Taking alfacalcidol orally seems to maintain BMD in prostatic carcinoma patients at risk for osteoporosis when treated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-a). Alfacalcidol maintains, but does not increase, BMD in these patients (6360).
Psoriasis. Topical vitamin D or vitamin D analogues improve symptoms of psoriasis. This benefit is not seen with oral vitamin D. Details: Topical application of vitamin D in the form of calcitriol or other vitamin D analogues, such as calcipotriene, maxacalcitol, and paricalcitol, effectively treats plaque psoriasis in some patients, including those with chronic plaque psoriasis (11822,84325). Applying topical vitamin D or its analogues in combination with topical corticosteroids such as betamethasone seems to be more effective for treating plaque psoriasis than either agent used alone (22283,82572,84325,84536,84647). Despite evidence that patients with psoriasis have low baseline serum levels of vitamin D, taking oral vitamin D does not seem to prevent psoriasis, improve symptoms, or reduce the severity of psoriasis in general (11822,22283,82572,84325,84536,84647,98193,108426,112481,112482). An analysis of a large clinical study in older adults with mild psoriasis shows that taking a vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) loading dose of 200,000 IU followed by vitamin D3 100,000 IU monthly for 1 year does not affect the severity or spread of psoriasis when compared with placebo (98193).

Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Some research suggests that oral vitamin D reduces symptoms of allergic rhinitis in children and adults. It is unclear if oral vitamin D during pregnancy is beneficial for the prevention of allergic rhinitis in the child. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with allergic rhinitis and vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks along with cetirizine improves overall symptom severity when compared with placebo and cetirizine. This improvement was not significant at 4 weeks, suggesting that symptom improvement might not occur until vitamin D has been adequately replenished (102120). Another moderate-sized clinical study conducted in China in adults with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis and vitamin D levels at the low end of the normal range shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily for 4 weeks along with mometasone nasal spray improves runny nose, itchy nose, and nasal congestion but does not reduce sneezing when compared with placebo and mometasone (112483). In children aged 5-15 years, 4 small- or moderate-sized clinical trials show that taking vitamin D 800 IU or 1000 IU daily for 1-6 months modestly reduces symptoms such as nasal congestion and rhinorrhea when compared with placebo or no supplementation (109728). It is unclear whether these children had vitamin D deficiency at baseline. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy has also been evaluated. A meta-analysis of three large clinical studies shows that prenatal vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of the child developing allergic rhinitis when compared with low-dose vitamin D, placebo, or no intervention (108438).
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Clinical research suggests that vitamin D deficiency is associated with greater risk for and severity of COVID-19 infection. Research of varying quality has evaluated the use of vitamin D supplementation in adults with COVID-19 infection, suggesting that it does not reduce overall mortality, but may reduce the risk of intubation and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). It is unclear whether any benefits are correlated to baseline vitamin D status. Details: Clinical and observational research suggests that prophylactic vitamin D supplementation may reduce the risk for and severity of COVID-19 infection in people with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency at baseline. An umbrella review of meta-analyses summarizing data from 9 observational studies suggests that vitamin D deficiency is associated with an increased risk for COVID-19 infection and a greater severity of illness when compared with control (114583). Additionally, a separate meta-analysis of 12 observational studies conducted early in the COVID-19 pandemic suggests that low baseline vitamin D status (25-hydroxyvitamin D levels below 30 ng/mL) is associated with a greater risk of severe COVID-19 pneumonia and mortality when compared with higher levels. However, patients with lower vitamin D levels were also more likely to have baseline hypertension and cardiovascular disease (107206). While earlier meta-analyses suggested that vitamin D supplementation did not prevent COVID-19 (109040,112488), a larger and more recent meta-analysis of 5 clinical studies conducted in healthcare workers, of whom 85-94% had vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency, shows that taking vitamin D reduces the odds of developing a COVID-19 infection by about 80% when compared with control. A separate meta-analysis of 2 clinical studies in the general population found no correlation between vitamin D supplementation and risk of COVID-19 infection; however, the people in these studies had adequate vitamin D levels at baseline (113590). The benefits of vitamin D prophylaxis in people with sufficient vitamin D levels is unclear. Clinical studies have evaluated the use of vitamin D supplementation in hospitalized adults with COVID-19, assessing hospital length of stay (LOS), the risk of ICU admission, and rate of intubation. Although meta-analyses conducted in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic did not identify an association between vitamin D supplementation and any of these outcomes (107206,109733,112490), more recent meta-analyses suggest benefit in certain populations. Meta-analyses of clinical studies in adults with COVID-19 show that vitamin D supplementation may be correlated with a modest reduction in hospital LOS in certain patients when compared with placebo or a lower dose of vitamin D. Subgroup analyses suggest that this reduction may be limited to patients with non-severe disease and those aged 60-65 years and older (115575,115578). Additionally, more recent meta-analyses of clinical studies show that vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of admission to the ICU when compared with control, although the odds ratio varies depending on the analysis conducted (112488,112490,115578). Similarly, meta-analyses of observational studies suggest that vitamin D supplementation is associated with a reduced odds of ICU admission when compared with control (113590,115578). Also, meta-analyses of clinical studies show that vitamin D supplementation modestly reduces the risk of intubation when compared with control (112488,115578). Meta-analyses of observational studies, as well as studies conducted early in the COVID-19 pandemic, originally suggested a potential reduction in mortality with the use of vitamin D supplementation during hospitalization (109040,114583,115578). However, more recent meta-analyses of prospective clinical studies do not support this finding. A meta-analysis of 19 clinical studies in adults with moderate to severe COVID-19 shows that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce mortality when compared with placebo or standard care, when controlling for heterogeneity. Additionally, a subgroup analysis of 13 clinical studies administering high-dose vitamin D does not show a reduction in mortality (115576). Other meta-analyses of clinical studies also show that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce mortality when compared with control, regardless of baseline vitamin D status (114488,115578). In most studies that provided vitamin D to hospitalized patients, oral doses ranged from 1000-25,000 IU daily for 1-3 weeks, 10,000-25,000 weekly for up to 6 weeks or until hospital discharge, or as a single 140,000-600,000 IU dose. In some studies, vitamin D 200,000-500,000 IU was administered intramuscularly as a single dose. Cholecalciferol was the most common form administered. However, some studies used calcitriol or calcifediol (107206,107208,109040,109733,112488,112490,113590,114583,115575,115578). Overall, the validity of the findings from meta-analyses is limited by the significant heterogeneity of the included studies, which enrolled patients of varying age, disease severity, and baseline vitamin D status, and implemented highly variable vitamin D supplementation protocols. The relationship between vitamin D levels and COVID-19 has also been evaluated in pregnant adults. A meta-analysis of observational research suggests that, while lower vitamin D levels are not associated with an increased risk of COVID-19, the presence of severe COVID-19 symptoms during pregnancy may be correlated to lower vitamin D levels when compared with non-severe COVID-19 symptoms (112025). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for post-COVID-19 symptoms. A clinical study in adults with vitamin D deficiency, as well as fatigue and neuropsychiatric symptoms for at least one month post-COVID-19, shows that taking vitamin D 60,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks modestly improves fatigue, anxiety, and some aspects of cognitive function, but not symptoms of depression, when compared with placebo (115580). It is unclear if the improvements in anxiety and cognitive function were clinically significant. Additionally, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial in adults with adequate baseline vitamin D levels.
Dental caries. Some research suggests that oral vitamin D reduces the risk of dental caries in children. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research suggests that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) reduces the risk of cavities by 49%, and vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) reduces the risk by 36% when compared with placebo in infants, children, and adolescents (84690). The validity of this finding is limited by the heterogeneity of the included trials. Also, clinical research shows an inverse correlation between cord blood vitamin D status and the number of decayed primary teeth in the infant at 12 months of age (104620). However, this same research shows that taking two oral prenatal doses of vitamin D2 50,000 IU during pregnancy does not prevent dental caries in the infant at 12 months of age or increase vitamin D levels in the cord blood (104620).
Heart failure. Limited research suggests that oral vitamin D reduces the risk of developing heart failure in some patients. However, vitamin D does not seem to improve outcomes in patients that have already developed heart failure. Details: Population research has found that vitamin D levels below 15 ng/mL are associated with increased risk of developing heart failure (16615). A meta-analysis of 17 trials, including the landmark Randomized Evaluation of Calcium Or vitamin D (RECORD) trial, shows that vitamin D reduces the risk of heart failure by 21% compared to not taking vitamin D in patients 60 years or older (91343). This finding is limited because none of the included trials were designed to determine effects on cardiovascular outcomes. In contrast, a secondary analysis of data from the Women's Health Initiative trial shows that taking vitamin D 400 IU with calcium 1000 mg daily is not associated with a reduced risk of heart failure in postmenopausal adults. However, a subgroup analysis of that trial shows that taking vitamin D plus calcium is associated with a 37% lower risk of developing heart failure in postmenopausal adults classified as low-risk for heart failure at baseline. It is speculated that high-risk patients might not benefit from vitamin D plus calcium due to negative interactions with medications used to manage cardiovascular risk factors in this group (97307). While vitamin D might be associated with a reduced risk of developing heart failure, most evidence suggests that vitamin D is not beneficial in patients already diagnosed with heart failure. In one small clinical trial, taking vitamin D3 50,000 IU weekly along with calcium citrate 800 mg daily for 6 months was not associated with an improvement in 6-minute walk test, timed get up and go test (TGUG), electrocardiographic variables, or health status when compared with placebo in adults with heart failure; mortality was not evaluated (97299,97300). In another clinical trial, taking vitamin D3 2000 IU daily did not decrease the risk of mortality when compared with placebo in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2 heart failure patients (16620).
Hyperparathyroidism-related bone loss. Limited evidence suggests that oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with this condition. Details: Taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) orally seems to help decrease secondary hyperparathyroidism and bone turnover in females. In one study, supplementation with vitamin D3 increased serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, reduced levels of parathyroid hormone, and decreased production of markers of bone turnover (3463).
Respiratory tract infections. Clinical research shows that oral vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in children but not in adults or older adults. Some clinical practice guidelines recommend vitamin D supplements or fortified foods for children to potentially lower the risk of RTIs. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the treatment of RTIs. Details: Prenatally, increased levels of vitamin D during pregnancy have been associated with a lower incidence of childhood RTIs (98197). However, two meta-analyses of small clinical studies and one meta-analysis of large clinical studies show no effect of prenatal vitamin D supplementation on the incidence of infant or childhood RTIs, including lower RTIs, when compared with control. Results related to risk of wheeze are conflicting (95910,95912,108438). In children, most research shows that vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of RTIs. A meta-analysis of clinical trials in children aged 1-16 years shows that taking vitamin D decreases the odds of having an RTI by about 29% when compared with control, although this study also identified a high likelihood of publication bias (105721). Daily or weekly vitamin D doses seem to be more beneficial than single bolus doses, although the largest meta-analysis failed to confirm this result (84689,93766,105721). One clinical study in preterm Black infants shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 200 IU daily and then 400 IU daily until 6 months of age does not affect the rate of RTIs, but does reduce wheeze by 11%, when compared with a normal diet without vitamin D supplementation (98191). This study may not have been powered to detect a difference in RTIs between groups. Clinical practice guidelines from the Endocrine Society conditionally recommend, based on low certainty of evidence, empiric vitamin D supplementation from vitamin D fortified foods, vitamin D supplements, or vitamin formulations that contain vitamin D to potentially lower the risk of RTIs in children and adolescents aged 1 to 18 years. Empiric vitamin D supplementation is defined as supplementing with vitamin D above the Recommended Dietary Allowance without having tested serum vitamin D status (114502). In adults, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to reduce the risk of RTIs. Observational research in adults has found that low levels of vitamin D are associated with worsened RTI complications, and even increased mortality in older adults ages 50-75 years (103659). However, meta-analyses of prospective clinical trials in adults show that taking vitamin D supplements 300-4000 IU daily for 7 weeks to 5 years or taking vitamin D 30,000-100,000 IU monthly or 96,000-120,000 IU every 2 months for 1-5 years does not reduce the odds of developing an RTI or severe respiratory complications, such as emergency department utilization, hospitalization, and death, when compared with placebo. These results were similar in subgroup analyses evaluating overall vitamin D dose and baseline vitamin D status (84689,105721,114506). The largest single clinical trial, conducted in adults at least 60 years of age, shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 60,000 IU once monthly for up to 5 years reduces the duration of total and severe respiratory symptoms by approximately 0.5 days, but does not reduce the incidence of respiratory illness or hospitalization, when compared with placebo (105726,110825). When adults and children are evaluated together, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to reduce the risk of respiratory infections. Two large meta-analyses of 40 clinical studies in both children and adults shows that taking vitamin D does not reduce the risk of acute RTIs. While subgroup analyses suggest a potential modest reduction in risk of acute RTIs in studies not exceeding 4 months' duration and with daily supplementation of 400-1200 IU during winter, spring, and autumn, these findings are limited by the low quality of the evidence and publication bias (108435,115582). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the treatment of RTIs. A large meta-analysis of clinical studies in both children and adults shows that taking vitamin D improves outcomes (e.g., sputum conversion, survival rate, therapeutic success, need for intensive care admission) by a small, but not clinically relevant, amount. In subgroup analyses, these beneficial effects only persisted in studies considered to be of low quality (108436). The validity of these findings is limited by publication bias.
Tooth retention. Oral vitamin D with calcium seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily along with calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Most research shows that taking vitamin D with or without calcium does not reduce the risk of CVD or CVD complications. There is some speculation that there might be modest benefit in the elderly, but more research is needed to confirm. Details: Population research has found that low vitamin D levels, especially those below 15 ng/mL, are associated with an increased risk of developing CVD (15630,16618,93944,113588). However, taking vitamin D supplements does not seem to prevent CVD. The majority of evidence from clinical research, population research, and meta-analyses shows that vitamin D supplementation, with or without calcium, does not reduce the risk of mortality, myocardial infarction, cardiac-related hospitalizations, or stroke when compared with placebo in patients with or without CVD risk factors (91343,97296,97305,97308,98902,98916,99762,109729,110811,110827)(112021,112022,113588). The most reliable evidence comes from two meta-analyses of mainly high-quality clinical research investigating the effect of supplementation with vitamin D alone or with calcium for at least 1 year. These analyses show that vitamin D does not reduce major adverse cardiovascular events, stroke, CVD mortality, or all-cause mortality, regardless of baseline vitamin D level, vitamin D dosage, sex, formulation, or concomitant calcium supplementation (99762,109729). One large clinical trial in individuals at increased CVD risk shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol 60,000 IU monthly modestly INCREASES the risk of CVD- and presumed CVD-related mortality (110827). The effect of vitamin D supplementation in elderly adults on CVD outcomes has also been evaluated. In some research, taking vitamin D 700-1000 IU daily shows a trend towards lower CVD events and reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in elderly patients (11931,98916,99762). However, another study in adults aged 70 years or older without a history of cardiovascular events and who are vitamin D replete at baseline shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 3 years does not decrease the risk of coronary heart disease, heart failure, stroke, or hypertension when compared with placebo (113581). Larger, high-quality trials with prespecified primary outcomes are needed to determine whether or not vitamin D supplementation reduces CVD risk in elderly populations.
Critical illness (trauma). Taking vitamin D 540,000 IU as a single oral dose does not reduce death or hospital stay in critically ill patients. However, limited research suggests that taking a smaller dose of vitamin D long-term might have a modest benefit. Details: The most robust evidence to date shows that correcting vitamin D levels in critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency does not reduce mortality rate or duration of hospital stay. A large, multicenter clinical study in critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency shows that administering a single, enteral dose of vitamin D 540,000 IU does not reduce 90-day all-cause mortality, duration of hospital stay, ventilator-free days, or other clinical outcomes when compared with placebo (103656). A previous meta-analysis of clinical research showed that vitamin D supplementation administered for a duration of 7 days or up to 6 months reduces the risk of death by 30% in critically ill hospitalized patients (95913). However, included studies were of low methodological quality, had high heterogeneity, assessed patients with and without vitamin D deficiency, and used variable vitamin D dose regimens and administrations methods (95913,95914).
Fractures. Most evidence shows that oral vitamin D alone does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. Some research shows that taking vitamin D with calcium prevents fractures; however, more research is needed to determine who is most likely to benefit. Details: Clinical research shows that taking vitamin D alone does not seem to prevent fractures in older adults. Most adults in these studies did not have osteoporosis, although osteoporosis status was unclear in some research (10140,12933,14282,38970,39015,84660,95822,97296,102145,104619)(109059,110827). However, several meta-analyses suggest that taking higher doses of vitamin D (about 800 IU daily) in combination with calcium might reduce overall fracture risk in older patients (38942,38970,39015,84660,102145,110809). One meta-analysis of clinical research in community- or long-term care-living males and females at least 65 years of age shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily in combination with calcium reduces the risk of hip and non-vertebral fractures by 25% and 20%, respectively, compared with placebo (110809). However, discrepancies exist which are possibly related to the dose and form of calcium used in combination with vitamin D and/or the patient population. Some research shows that taking vitamin D 800 IU daily in combination with calcium 1200 mg daily as tricalcium phosphate reduces fracture risk by up to 31% while taking vitamin D with calcium carbonate does not reduce fracture risk (12929,14282,16878,110809). Some individual clinical studies in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years show that taking vitamin D plus calcium daily for 2-7 years does not prevent fractures when compared with placebo (14282,16878). Other confounding variables include the possible additional effects of hormonal therapy when given with calcium to postmenopausal adults and/or the inclusion of institutionalized patients with unclear osteoporotic status (95822,97296). Most research shows that taking vitamin D in combination with omega-3 fatty acids does not prevent fractures. A large clinical study shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily alone or with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily and/or strength training three times weekly does not prevent fractures in adults over 70 years of age when compared with placebo (104619). Another large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily, alone or with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, over approximately 5 years does not prevent overall fractures, nonvertebral fractures, or hip fractures in adults over 50 (males) or 55 (females) years old when compared with placebo. Although the osteoporosis status of the population was unclear, findings were consistent in adults at high fracture risk based on use of osteoporosis medications and/or a history of fragility fractures (109059). As of April 2018, the US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends against supplementing with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less along with calcium 1000 mg daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal adults. The USPSTF also concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with doses of vitamin D greater than 400 IU daily along with calcium doses greater than 1000 mg daily is safe or effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture (95695). For information on patients WITH osteoporosis, refer to the Osteoporosis discussion. There is limited research available regarding the effects of vitamin D supplementation for fracture prevention in children. Preliminary research in children aged 2 to 17 years with vitamin D insufficiency and one or more previous fractures shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily with calcium 600 mg daily for 6 months modestly reduces the risk of forearm fractures over 12 months compared with children not given vitamin D or calcium (110820).
Hypertension. Overall, vitamin D does not seem to prevent or lower high blood pressure in most patients; however, it may lower blood pressure in hypertensive patients with vitamin D deficiency. Details: Although population research has found that lower vitamin D levels are associated with a higher risk of developing hypertension, clinical research shows vitamin D supplementation does not prevent hypertension (15630). A large clinical trial in postmenopausal adults shows that taking vitamin D3 400 IU with calcium 1000 mg daily does not reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Most meta-analyses and clinical trials in patients with existing hypertension show that vitamin D supplementation does not lower blood pressure when compared with placebo, regardless of vitamin D formulation, dose, or duration of supplementation (16714,91340,96405,103657,104619,113583,113668). However, a meta-analysis of 5 clinical studies in patients with hypertension and vitamin D deficiency shows that supplementation with vitamin D reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by about 7 mmHg and 3 mmHg, respectively, when compared with placebo (100895). Another meta-analysis of 11 clinical trials in patients over 60 years of age with hypertension and vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D supplements significantly reduces systolic, but not diastolic, blood pressure when compared with placebo, especially in trials lasting more than 8 weeks where the total dose of vitamin D is above 400,000 IU (113592). An individual clinical study in patients with hypertension and vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly or 1000 IU daily reduces systolic blood pressure by about 6 mmHg and mean arterial pressure by about 4 mmHg, but does not affect diastolic blood pressure, when compared to baseline (108440).
Prostate cancer. Oral vitamin D does not appear to affect prostate cancer progression or cancer-related mortality. Details: A meta-analysis of three clinical trials shows that vitamin D supplementation does not affect prostate cancer progression as measured by prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or mortality in patients with prostate cancer (99770).
Psychosis. Oral vitamin D does not seem to improve symptoms in patients with a functional psychotic disorder. Details: A clinical study in adults with a functional psychotic disorder shows that taking oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 20,000 IU monthly for 6 months has no effect on total positive and negative syndrome scale score (PANSS) when compared with placebo. The majority of patients included in this study were deficient in vitamin D at baseline (107226).
Tuberculosis. Oral vitamin D seems to be ineffective for reducing the severity of tuberculosis or mortality from tuberculosis. Limited research suggests that vitamin D may have small benefits in newly diagnosed patients receiving tuberculosis treatment for the first time. Details: Although population research has found that tuberculosis is associated with vitamin D deficiency, most clinical research shows that taking vitamin D does not improve clinical outcomes in people with tuberculosis infection. Meta-analyses and individual clinical studies show that taking vitamin D as a single 100,000 IU dose, or as 400 IU daily for 2 months, along with standard care does not improve tuberculosis severity or reduce the risk of mortality in children or adults with tuberculosis, regardless of their baseline vitamin D levels (82570,82475,98913,103655,103668,104022). However, some research has identified modest benefits in newly diagnosed patients receiving anti-tuberculosis treatment for the first time. A meta-analysis of clinical research in this population shows that taking vitamin D at a dose of 1000 IU daily or 600,000 IU monthly modestly increases the odds of sputum smear conversions by 1.2-fold, but does not improve the time to sputum smear conversions, when compared with placebo (98235). A small clinical study in treatment-naïve adults with low levels of serum vitamin D shows that taking calcitriol 0.25 mcg twice daily for up to 6 months, starting with anti-tuberculosis treatment initiation, decreases the time to sputum smear conversion and 50% lesion absorption by about 3 days when compared with not taking vitamin D (109045). Additionally, a small clinical study in children aged 6-18 years with vitamin D insufficiency receiving standard treatment for newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis shows that taking vitamin D 1000 IU daily reduces the duration of fever and cough by 1 and 2 weeks, respectively, when compared with placebo (108437).

Acne. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for acne. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with acne and vitamin D deficiency shows that taking cholecalciferol 1,000 IU daily for 2 months reduces the number of inflammatory lesions by about 35%, compared with 6% in those taking placebo. There was no effect on the total or non-inflammatory lesion count (106127). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking alfacalcidol (One Alpha, LEO Company, Denmark) 0.25 mcg daily for 3 months modestly improves acne severity when compared with taking placebo (106128). In addition, population research has found that individuals with acne have modestly lower vitamin D levels than healthy controls. The odds of vitamin D deficiency were approximately three times higher in patients with acne when compared with healthy controls (106105).
Age-related cognitive decline. It is unclear if oral cholecalciferol is beneficial for preventing age-related cognitive decline. Details: Pooled results of two large clinical sub-studies in community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older show that taking cholecalciferol 2000 IU daily for 2-3 years has no effect on cognitive decline when compared with placebo. A subgroup analysis in Black patients suggests a modest effect of vitamin D when compared with placebo (108428).
Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for this condition. Details: Some population research has found that lower serum concentrations of vitamin D are associated with higher risk of Alzheimer disease, and also with decreased cognition. People with Alzheimer disease seem to have serum concentrations of vitamin D that are about 2.5 ng/mL lower than patients without Alzheimer disease (84672,103666). However, other population research has found that vitamin D deficiency (<25 nmol/L) or insufficiency (25-50 nmol/L) is not associated with increased risk of Alzheimer disease (100899).
Asthma. Oral vitamin D might reduce asthma exacerbations in adults and children with mild, but not severe or persistent, asthma. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy or the first 6 months of an infant's life does not seem to prevent the development of asthma later in infancy or childhood. Details: Population research in patients with asthma suggests that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk of exacerbations and increased need for medication therapy (94693). However, findings from clinical research are mixed. Some meta-analyses of clinical trials in adults and children with asthma show that taking vitamin D for 3 months to 1 year reduces the rate of asthma exacerbations by 31% to 38% when compared with control (92690,94686,115584). However, other meta-analyses show that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of asthma exacerbations when compared with placebo (109728,109732,110833). The reasons for this discrepancy are not clear. However, some clinical research suggests that vitamin D supplements might only prevent asthma in people with non-persistent asthma (92690,94685,94686,94688,104020). Also, many studies are small and do not represent patients with severe asthma exacerbations (92690,94687). Baseline levels of vitamin D may play a role. A clinical study in children aged 6-16 years with persistent asthma and low vitamin D levels shows that taking vitamin D 4000 IU daily for 48 weeks does not reduce severe asthma exacerbations when compared with placebo (104020). However, a meta-analysis including this study shows that taking vitamin D does reduce risk of asthma exacerbations in children with low baseline vitamin D levels (109728). Additionally, two meta-analyses show that taking vitamin D seems to modestly improve pulmonary function when compared with placebo (109732,115584). Vitamin D doses have varied, with oral doses of 200-4000 IU daily, 1000-14,000 IU once weekly, 60,000 IU once monthly, 120,000 IU every 2 months, 100,000 IU 14 days apart, or 100,000 to 600,000 IU as a bolus dose followed by 400-4000 IU daily (92690,94686,104020,109728,110833,115584). Vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of asthma in infants has also been evaluated. A meta-analysis of 4 large clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D 400-1200 IU daily for the first 6 months of life does not reduce the risk of asthma or wheezing at 6-30 months of age when compared with control (112031). Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy has also been evaluated (97306,99763,102146,112031). A meta-analysis of 3 large clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D 2800-4400 IU daily during the 2^nd and 3^rd trimesters of pregnancy reduces the risk of recurrent wheezing by 23% but does not reduce the risk of asthma diagnosis within the first 3-6 years of life when compared with vitamin D 400 IU daily (112031). Some research suggests that the dose of vitamin D plays a role. A meta-analysis shows that prenatal vitamin D 800 IU daily reduces the odds of wheeze or asthma by 32%, while lower or higher vitamin D doses were not beneficial (103661).
Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for athletic performance. Details: One small clinical trial in athletes shows that taking vitamin D 20,000 or 40,000 IU once weekly for 2 doses does not affect performance on vertical jumps, sprints, or leg and bench presses when compared with placebo (98188). Another small clinical trial in professional rugby players shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 50,000 IU once every two weeks over 12 weeks does not improve sprinting speed or the ability to perform bench presses, bench pulls, and chin-ups when compared with placebo (98189). Also, most research shows that taking vitamin D does not improve measures of cardiorespiratory fitness. One small study in young males undergoing resistance training shows that taking vitamin D 8000 IU daily for 12 weeks does not improve cardiorespiratory fitness compared with taking placebo (110812).
Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Most research shows that oral vitamin D reduces eczema severity in children. However, most research shows that oral vitamin D, taken during pregnancy or infancy, does not prevent eczema in the child. Details: A meta-analysis of eight moderate-quality clinical trials in children shows that taking vitamin D, most commonly 1000-2000 IU daily for 4-12 weeks, modestly reduces severity of eczema when compared with placebo (109728). Most of the children in these studies were also given conventional medications. Oral vitamin D has also been evaluated for eczema prevention. A meta-analysis of two clinical studies shows that consuming vitamin D 2800-4400 IU daily during the 2^nd and 3^rd trimesters of pregnancy is not associated with a reduced risk for eczema in children during the first 3 years of life when compared with vitamin D 400 IU daily (97306). Another meta-analysis of five large clinical studies shows that prenatal or infant vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of developing eczema when compared with low-dose vitamin D, placebo, or no intervention (108438).
Atrial fibrillation. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing atrial fibrillation. Details: A large clinical trial in adults without cardiovascular disease shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for an average of 5 years does not reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation when compared with placebo or fish oil 840 mg daily (105209). However, observational research in postmenopausal adults with osteoporosis found that vitamin D supplementation is associated with a lower occurrence of atrial fibrillation when compared with not taking vitamin D (98922). Also, one large observational study in vitamin D-deficient patients with no history of atrial fibrillation has found that vitamin D supplementation for at least 6 months is associated with up to a 16% decreased risk of atrial fibrillation when compared with not taking vitamin D. There were also modest improvements in atrial fibrillation-free survival. In males 65 years and older with hypertension or diabetes at baseline, blood levels of at least 30 ng/mL following vitamin D supplementation were associated with decreased risk of atrial fibrillation; a post-supplementation blood level of 21-29 ng/mL was not associated with decreased risk (109043).
Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for ADHD. Details: A small clinical trial in children 5-12 years of age with ADHD and vitamin D insufficiency shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily along with methylphenidate for 8 weeks seems to improve parental ratings of evening, but not morning or overall, symptoms of inattentiveness and impulsivity when compared with methylphenidate alone. Vitamin D insufficiency was defined as levels less than 30 ng/mL (98196). Based on these and other preliminary findings, Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that vitamin D in doses of 1500 to 4000 IU daily is weakly recommended for adjunctive use in children with ADHD, especially those with insufficient intake or skin exposure to sunlight (110318).
Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for autism spectrum disorder. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 2.5-8 years with autism spectrum disorder shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 12 months modestly reduces irritability and hyperactivity when compared with placebo (99767).
Autoimmune thyroiditis. It is unclear of oral vitamin D improves outcomes in patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Details: A meta-analysis of 12 clinical trials in patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis shows that taking vitamin D for at least 12 weeks increases free triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) levels, and reduces levels of thyroid stimulating hormone, thyroglobulin antibody, and anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody, when compared with placebo or no treatment (113593).
Back pain. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for reducing chronic low back pain. Details: A meta-analysis of 10 clinical studies in adults with chronic low back pain shows that taking vitamin D does not reduce pain scores when compared with placebo, regardless of baseline vitamin D status or duration of supplementation. Oral vitamin D dosages used in these studies included 400-4000 IU daily for 1-6 months, 50,000 IU once weekly for 8 weeks, or 150,000-300,000 IU as a single dose. Intramuscular dosages ranged from 150,000-300,00 IU as a single dose (115588).
Bacterial vaginosis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for bacterial vaginosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in females at high risk for sexually transmitted disease shows that taking vitamin D along with standard therapy for bacterial vaginosis does not reduce the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis when compared with placebo. Patients in this study had been treated with metronidazole 500 mg orally twice daily for 7 days along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 50,000 IU each week for 4 weeks and then every 4 weeks for the remaining 20 weeks (91348).
Bariatric surgery complications. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation after bariatric surgery attenuates any bone health-related complications. Details: Clinical research in adults who had undergone bariatric surgery shows that vitamin D supplementation in doses of 800-7900 IU daily improves vitamin D status when compared with placebo. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation in these doses for 1 year improves parathyroid hormone levels or bone mineral density or reduces fracture risk (115589).
Breast cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention of breast cancer. Details: Some population research evaluating intake of calcium plus vitamin D suggests that higher vitamin D intake is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer in premenopausal or postmenopausal adults (15631). Similarly, a large observational study in females with a biological sibling with breast cancer has found that taking vitamin D recently or prior to enrollment is not associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer when compared with nonrecent vitamin D use or never taking vitamin D, respectively (107215). However, other research found that higher vitamin D intake is associated with a 17% reduced risk of breast cancer in premenopausal and perimenopausal, but not postmenopausal, adults (39001). Observational research has also examined the association between blood levels of vitamin D and risk of developing breast cancer. A meta-analysis found that those with serum levels of about 52 ng/mL had a 50% lower risk of developing breast cancer when compared with those with serum levels of less than 13 ng/mL. This high serum level of vitamin D corresponds to a high dose of about 4000 IU daily (16049). Other observational research has found that baseline vitamin D levels of more than 20 ng/mL are associated with a 48% reduced risk of developing breast cancer over approximately 9 years in Latina females in the US when compared with levels below 20 ng/mL; however, this association was not present in Black females (109058). Despite the contradictory findings from observational research, results from clinical research are generally negative. Evidence from one large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative) shows that postmenopausal adults who take vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years do not have a significantly reduced risk of developing breast cancer (16715,98895). Also, a meta-analysis of two large-scale clinical trials, which did not include the Women's Health Initiative trial, shows that taking vitamin D 800-1000 IU daily, alone or with calcium, for 3-4 years does not reduce the incidence of breast cancer in postmenopausal adults, although there was a trend towards reduced risk with higher doses of vitamin D supplementation (97301). While vitamin D and calcium supplementation during the intervention period of the Women's Health Initiative trial was not associated with a reduced risk of developing breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a precursor to breast cancer, a secondary post-hoc analysis of the data shows that supplementation reduces the risk of developing DCIS by 18% over a median follow-up of 19 years (107216). Additional research is needed regarding an optimal dose of vitamin D, timing of initiation, and whether any benefit is affected by menopausal status.
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Limited research suggests that vitamin D deficiency is linked with bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the infant. Details: Observational research has found that vitamin D deficiency at birth is associated with about a 2-fold increased odds of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (104021). However, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial.
Cancer. Vitamin D does not seem to reduce overall cancer risk. However, some research shows that vitamin D might slightly reduce the risk of metastatic cancer and cancer-related mortality. Details: There is interest in vitamin D for cancer PREVENTION, as observational research suggests that higher vitamin D intake and higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with a lower risk of cancer (111150). While individual clinical trials evaluating vitamin D for cancer have produced inconsistent findings, most meta-analyses and clinical trials show that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) alone or with calcium does not significantly reduce the risk of developing cancer (15629,91344,93943,97296,98916,104024,104618,110811). However, vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of metastatic cancer and cancer-related mortality. A large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D3 2000 IU daily for a median of 5.3 years slightly reduces the risk of advanced metastatic or fatal cancers when compared with placebo (104618). Additionally, meta-analyses of several large clinical trials show that taking vitamin D 400-4000 IU daily, with or without calcium, for 1-7 years reduces the risk of cancer-related mortality by 12-13% when compared with control, while intermittent bolus dosing of vitamin D at high doses for 1-5 years does not appear to reduce the risk of cancer-related mortality (104024,111149). The role of vitamin D in cancer TREATMENT is unclear. A meta-analysis of clinical and observational research suggests that supplementation of vitamin D after a cancer diagnosis is associated with a modest improvement in overall survival, but not progression-free or cancer-specific survival (109726). Doses used in clinical research ranged between 1200 IU and 8000 IU daily or 100,000 IU every 50 days, after surgery and/or during treatment (99195,99196,109726). Other clinical research in patients with luminal gastrointestinal cancers shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily does not reduce the risk of relapse when compared with placebo (99195). It is unclear which, if any, types or stages of cancer respond best to vitamin D, and what dose of vitamin D is optimal.
Child growth. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for improving infant growth or bone structure. Details: Meta-analyses and individual clinical trials show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy modestly increases length at birth and bone mineral density at up to 7 years of age when compared with control, usually placebo or vitamin D 400 IU daily. However, there was no effect on length in the infant up to one year of age, weight at birth or up to one year of age, head circumference at birth or up to 6 years of age, bone mineral content at up to 6 years of age, or neonatal bone mineral density, bone mineral content, bone area, or femur or humoral length (98198,109737,112028,115585). In the available research, vitamin D was taken in doses of 200 IU to 4400 IU daily, 4200 IU to 50,000 IU weekly, 50,000 IU every 2 weeks, or 60,000 IU every 4-8 weeks, starting from the early to late stages of pregnancy and usually continued until birth (98198,109737,115585).
Chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with CKD. Most research suggests that it does not reduce the risk for adverse cardiovascular events. Details: Population research in patients on dialysis has found that vitamin D levels less than 17.8 ng/mL are associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with higher levels (16619). A meta-analysis and individual clinical studies show that vitamin D and vitamin D analogues decrease parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels and urine protein levels in people with CKD (84376,84377,84628,98233,98236). However, taking vitamin D does not appear to decrease the risk of death or parathyroidectomy in CKD patients (84376,84377). Also, taking vitamin D increases the risk for hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia in this patient population (84376,84377,98236). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the prevention of cardiovascular events in adults with CKD. Observational research has found that vitamin D deficiency in patients with CKD is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. However, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to be beneficial. One clinical study shows that taking paricalcitol, an active form of vitamin D, titrated to maintain adequate serum calcium levels, for 48 weeks does not affect the size of the left ventricle or heart function when compared with placebo (98233). Other clinical research in Japanese patients on hemodialysis for CKD shows that adding alfacalcidol, another active form of vitamin D, 0.5 mcg daily to standard treatment for 4 years does not affect mortality or cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarctions, stroke, aortic dissection, and others compared to standard treatment only (98920). Also, a large clinical trial in patients with CKD shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol 2000 IU daily, alone or with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily, does not affect major cardiovascular events or invasive cancer when compared with placebo (110811). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for musculoskeletal health in adults with CKD. A small clinical study shows that taking cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily, with or without physical activity, for 3 months improves bicep strength, but not back flexibility or aerobic fitness capacity, when compared with baseline. In patients taking cholecalciferol in combination with physical activity, musculoskeletal health was similar when compared with cholecalciferol alone (108431). However, this study was inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups, and it is unclear if the improvement from baseline differed between groups. Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the improvement of iron status in adults with CKD and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Clinical research shows that taking Vitamin D as cholecalciferol (Vitamin D3 Forte Renapharma) 8000 IU daily for 12 weeks does not improve iron status compared with taking placebo. However, a sub-analysis shows that hemoglobin levels are modestly improved in patients with a low Vitamin D status at baseline suggesting that Vitamin D might improve iron availability in these patients (110819).
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for COPD; benefits may be limited to patients with severe vitamin D deficiency. Details: Population research has found an association between low vitamin D levels and reduced lung function, increased risk of developing COPD, and worsening COPD severity (17685,96401). However, 3 meta-analyses of clinical research in adults with COPD show that, overall, oral vitamin D does not have beneficial effects on mortality, rate of COPD exacerbations, pulmonary function, or most measures of symptom severity when compared with placebo (109732,112485,115586). A subgroup analysis suggests that any benefits of vitamin D supplementation may be limited to patients with severe vitamin D deficiency (25-hydroxyvitamin D levels below 25 nmol/L) at baseline (115586).
Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for cognitive function. Details: Population research has found that low vitamin D levels are associated with worse cognitive performance and cognitive decline when compared to high vitamin D levels in healthy adults (84672,95916). However, the effect of vitamin D supplementation on cognitive function is unclear. One small meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation does not improve cognitive function (95916). However, the included trials evaluated a widely heterogeneous study population and utilized variable measures of cognitive function.
Cognitive impairment. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Details: A small clinical study in older adults with mild cognitive impairment shows that taking vitamin D3 10,000 IU three times weekly for 20 weeks in addition to exercise and cognitive training does not improve cognitive function when compared with placebo and exercise with or without cognitive training. However, most participants had sufficient serum vitamin D levels at baseline (112489).
Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of colorectal cancer. Details: Epidemiological research has found that a higher serum vitamin D level is associated with decreased risk of mortality and increased survival in patients with colorectal cancer (16101,99196). However, it is unclear whether vitamin D supplementation improves survival in patients with colorectal cancer, as research has generally involved small populations and results are somewhat conflicting. A subgroup analysis of one clinical study shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily does not reduce the risk of relapse or death, death due to any cause, or relapse over 5 years when compared with placebo in patients with colorectal cancer (99195). However, this subgroup may have been underpowered to detect between-group differences. Another small clinical trial in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer shows that taking high-dose vitamin D 8000 IU daily during the first cycle of chemotherapy, and then 4000 IU daily for subsequent cycles, does not increase median progression-free survival when compared with taking vitamin D 400 IU daily. However, patients taking high-dose vitamin D were 36% less likely to experience disease progression or death during follow-up when compared with patients taking the lower dose of vitamin D (99196). This latter result suggests that high-dose vitamin D supplementation might be beneficial for patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, but larger, multicenter studies are needed to confirm. The role of vitamin D in colorectal cancer prevention has also been investigated. A meta-analysis of epidemiological research has found that a higher serum vitamin D level is associated with a decreased colorectal cancer risk; however, sub-analyses suggest that this association only occurs in females, not males (109740). Most studies have evaluated vitamin D supplements in combination with calcium; the effects of vitamin D supplementation alone are unclear. One meta-analysis of clinical research suggests that taking vitamin D plus calcium is not associated with a decreased incidence of colorectal cancer in people with a low baseline risk of colorectal cancer (39042). Another meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation, with or without calcium, does not reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer or colorectal adenomas (109730). Additionally, a large clinical trial suggests that postmenopausal adults who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290,98895). One clinical study shows that taking calcium supplements reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas, but not in people with lower than average vitamin D levels (12118).
Crohn disease. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D reduces relapses in patients with Crohn disease. Details: A meta-analysis of small, low-quality clinical studies in patients with IBD, including Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, shows that taking high- or low-dose vitamin D for up to 1 year reduces the rate of relapse when compared with control (98915). The validity of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies.
Dementia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for dementia. Details: Population research has found that patients with any type of dementia have serum concentrations of vitamin D that are about 2.5 ng/mL lower than patients without dementia (84672). However, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial.
Depression. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for treating depression. Vitamin D does not seem to prevent the development of depression. Details: The role of vitamin D in the treatment of depression is unclear. Earlier meta-analyses of clinical research show that vitamin D supplementation does not improve overall symptoms of depression. However, some subgroup analyses suggest that vitamin D may be beneficial for improving the symptoms of depression in people with clinically significant symptoms, as well as those with baseline vitamin D deficiency (97295,97298). More recent meta-analyses of several clinical trials, that include some of the same studies, show that vitamin D modestly improves symptoms of depression in adults; however, subgroup analysis suggests that vitamin D does not improve depressive symptoms in older adults (110832,112786). These analyses are mixed over whether baseline vitamin D status affects results (110832,112786) and one of these analyses shows no evidence that the type of depression affects findings (110832). Another meta-analysis of generally small clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes and depression shows that taking vitamin D modestly improves depressive symptoms when compared with placebo or no intervention (110814). Although, results of an individual clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes are in contrast (108423). The evaluated research implemented one-time doses of 150,000-500,000 IU, as well as daily and weekly doses ranging between 400-5000 IU daily or 5000-100,000 IU weekly for 6 weeks to 2 years, with the most evidence of benefit related to one-time high doses. Cholecalciferol was the most common form of vitamin D used (97295,97298,108423,110814,110832,112786). Significant heterogeneity between studies and the wide variability in dosing strategies limit the validity of these findings, as well as identification of an effective dose or target population. Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the prevention of depression. One large clinical study (VITAL-DEP) in healthy patients 50 years and older shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for about 5.3 years does not prevent depression or depressive symptoms, or improve mood, when compared with placebo (103670). An analysis of a cohort of patients from the VITAL-DEP trial also shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 2 years does not reduce the risk of major depressive disorder or improve mood scores in patients with subthreshold depression or risk factors for late-life depression when compared with placebo (112032). In addition, a meta-analysis of several clinical studies suggests that vitamin D supplementation does not prevent depression based on subgroup analysis of patients without depression at baseline (112786). Based on these and other preliminary findings, Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that vitamin D in doses of 1500 to 4000 IU daily is weakly recommended for adjunctive or monotherapy use in patients with depression, especially those with insufficient intake or skin exposure to sunlight (110318).
Diabetes. Oral vitamin D might improve glycemic indices in some patients with type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes. It is unclear if oral or intramuscular vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention of type 1 or gestational diabetes. Details: Most meta-analyses of mainly small clinical trials show that vitamin D supplementation is beneficial for measures of glycemic control in adults with diabetes. However, the best evidence of benefit is in people with baseline vitamin D deficiency. Five meta-analyses of clinical studies in patients with type 2 diabetes show that vitamin D supplementation reduces glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.2% to 0.3%, and improves serum insulin, fasting blood glucose, and measures of insulin resistance when compared with control (96403,110822,112487,115581,115583). Supplemental vitamin D seems to be most beneficial in patients with baseline vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency (96403,107210,110822,112487,115581). Furthermore, correlation analysis suggests an inverse relationship between serum vitamin D levels and serum insulin, fasting blood glucose, and measures of insulin resistance (112487). In most clinical studies vitamin D supplementation ranged from 1000-6000 IU daily, 20,000-60,000 IU weekly, or 100,000-400,000 IU once over 8-48 weeks (96403,107210,110822,115581,115583). Most analyses exhibited significant heterogeneity related to vitamin D dosing regimen, geographic location, and patient population. However, one meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with diabetes shows that vitamin D improves HbA1c, insulin resistance, and insulin measures in studies lasting less than 6 months, but not in studies lasting longer than 6 months (99764). An additional meta-analysis suggests that most evidence of benefit is associated with doses of more than 2000 IU daily for 4-12 weeks (110822). Another meta-analysis suggests that benefits may be greater in adults with less severe obesity and a shorter duration of type 2 diabetes (115583). Vitamin D has been evaluated for the prevention of type 1 diabetes. There is preliminary evidence that daily vitamin D supplementation (form not specified) in infants during the first year of life is associated with a reduced incidence of type 1 diabetes development later in life (10139). Also, a meta-analysis of population studies has found that vitamin D supplementation in early childhood is associated with a 29% reduced risk of developing type 1 diabetes later in life (84225). Vitamin D has been evaluated in adults with gestational diabetes, yielding conflicting findings. One clinical trial shows that oral vitamin D 50,000 IU every 4 weeks modestly reduces levels of insulin, as well as measures of insulin resistance, with no effect on fasting blood glucose (106125), whereas other clinical research shows that this same dosing regimen modestly reduces levels of fasting blood glucose and HbA1c, with no effect on insulin measures (106126). A separate clinical study shows that taking oral vitamin D 500 IU twice daily in yogurt modestly improves all measures of glycemic indices (101775). Additionally, a large clinical trial shows that taking oral vitamin D 1600 IU daily modestly reduces fasting blood glucose when compared with vitamin D 400 IU daily (112020). Some clinical research also shows that oral vitamin D modestly improves levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides when compared with control (106125,110823), although not all research agrees (106126). Also, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking oral vitamin D reduces the risk of premature birth and neonatal hospitalization by approximately 63% and 62%, respectively (110823). A meta-analysis of 5 small clinical studies shows that taking oral vitamin D 400-1000 IU daily for 6 weeks or 50,000 IU twice over 6 weeks along with calcium decreases fasting plasma glucose and serum insulin when compared with placebo (115579). One small clinical study shows that giving vitamin D 300,000 IU as a single intramuscular injection at 24-28 weeks' gestation does not affect HbA1c (106124). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for the prevention of gestational diabetes. A Cochrane analysis of one large clinical study shows that taking vitamin D during pregnancy does not lower the risk of gestational diabetes when compared with no supplementation (114587). In addition, a meta-analysis of population studies suggests that there is a U-shaped association between serum vitamin D levels and the risk of developing gestational diabetes, with 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels of 40-90 nmol/L associated with the lowest risk (106109). A meta-analysis of clinical research in adults with insulin resistance during pregnancy, but not gestational diabetes, shows that taking vitamin D at varying doses for 6-26 weeks modestly decreases measures of insulin resistance when compared with placebo (110821). However, this study did not evaluate whether vitamin D prevented the development of gestational diabetes in these patients. Vitamin D has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. One study evaluated vitamin D in combination with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 360 mg plus docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 240 mg twice daily, suggesting that this combination improves glycemic markers when compared with taking vitamin D alone (106122). Other clinical research in patients with gestational diabetes shows that taking vitamin D with omega-3 fatty acids 8,000 mg twice daily for 6 weeks modestly improves glycemic indices when compared with placebo (106114). However, it is unclear if these effects are due to vitamin D, other ingredients, or the combination.
Diabetic foot ulcers. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for diabetic foot ulcers. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with diabetic foot ulcers shows that taking vitamin D modestly reduces ulcer size and improves glycemic and lipid indices when compared with placebo (110835). This meta-analysis is limited by the availability of three small clinical trials, as well as the heterogeneous doses of vitamin D in the included studies.
Diabetic nephropathy. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D improves some markers of kidney function in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in patients with diabetic nephropathy shows that taking vitamin D or its analogs reduces inflammatory markers and protein in the urine, but does not affect measures of kidney function such as serum creatinine or glomerular filtration rate, when compared to control (99771).
Diabetic retinopathy. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in diabetic retinopathy. Details: There is weak evidence from observational research suggesting a link between vitamin D deficiency and diabetic retinopathy (112095). However, clinical research addressing the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation for treatment or prevention of diabetic retinopathy is lacking.
Dysmenorrhea. Limited evidence suggests that oral vitamin D reduces pain in patients with dysmenorrhea. Details: A meta-analysis of 9 small clinical studies in patients with dysmenorrhea shows that taking vitamin D in doses ranging from 5000 IU daily to 300,000 IU monthly modestly reduces pain when compared with control (112029). However, the validity of these findings is limited by a high degree of heterogeneity across the studies, including differences in blinding and control interventions, vitamin D doses and frequency of supplementation, and baseline vitamin D levels. Another small clinical study in adolescent patients with dysmenorrhea shows that taking vitamin D3 50,000 IU weekly for 9 weeks modestly reduces pain when compared to baseline (98912). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
Erectile dysfunction (ED). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for ED. Details: Although some data suggest ED is associated with low serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D levels, preliminary research in males aged 60-84 years shows that taking vitamin D 60,000 IU once monthly for up to 5 years does not prevent or improve ED when compared with placebo (113580).
Exercise-induced muscle damage. Small studies suggest that vitamin D does not improve exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A meta-analysis of 6 small studies shows that taking vitamin D before and/or during exercise does not improve circulating levels of creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, or myoglobin when compared with placebo (107218).
Fall prevention. The role of vitamin D in fall prevention is confusing and controversial. Most clinical research shows that taking vitamin D 800-1000 IU daily decreases the risk of falls, with effects most apparent with daily over intermittent dosing and in those with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency. Taking vitamin D at doses higher or lower than this may be associated with increased risk of falls. Details: Higher serum levels of vitamin D have been associated with improved lower-extremity function in elderly adults (15636). Clinical research in older adults shows that taking vitamin D or vitamin D analogues, with or without calcium, reduces the number of people who have a fall by up to 19% (39038,84215,84374,84539,94130,104023,113595,114504). Other research shows that vitamin D, with or without calcium, reduces number of falls by 19% to 50% (11939,16275,84404,93941,109053). The beneficial effect does not appear to depend on the form of vitamin D used (ergocalciferol, cholecalciferol, calcitriol, or alfacalcidol) (39038,84374,113595). Multiple meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking vitamin D leads to a decreased rate of falls in patients with low baseline levels of vitamin D, but not in those with adequate vitamin D levels (84670,84684,109053,114504). One meta-analysis also suggests that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol up to 1000 IU daily reduces fall risk by up to 19%, whereas higher doses do not reduce fall risk (109053). Also, daily dosing, but not intermittent dosing, seems to be associated with a reduced risk of falling (109053,114504). Similarly, another meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin D 800-1000 IU daily, with or without calcium, lowers the risk of falls by about 15-26% when compared with placebo, no treatment, or calcium alone. However, taking vitamin D 500 IU or less daily and vitamin D 1100 IU or more daily, with or without calcium, is not associated with a lower risk of falls and may even increase the risk of falls by 22-44% (114504). Despite the above meta-analyses, other clinical research shows that vitamin D does not reduce the risk of falling (84404,84670), the rate of falls overall (84670,93942), or the rate of injurious falls (93942) in elderly patients (93942). One study in adults over 70 years of age with a history of falling found that taking high-dose vitamin D, either as 60,000 IU monthly or 24,000 IU plus calcifediol 300 mcg monthly, increased both the risk of falling and the mean number of falls compared to a lower dose of 24,000 IU monthly (93940). One meta-analysis of 20 trials including nearly 30,000 patients shows that taking vitamin D, with or without calcium, does not reduce the risk of falling in elderly patients, regardless of baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D achieved with treatment, duration of treatment, or residential status of the patients (91342). While a meta-analysis of 10 trials in nearly 6,000 patients shows that taking vitamin D 700-1000 IU daily with calcium 1000-2000 mg daily reduces the risk of falling in the elderly by 12% when compared with placebo or no treatment, a meta-analysis of 21 trials in nearly 52,000 patients shows that vitamin D alone is only associated with a reduced risk of falls in patients with baseline vitamin D levels of less than 50 nmol/L when compared with placebo or no treatment (107224). The 2018 US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for fall prevention acknowledges this research by recommending AGAINST vitamin D supplementation for fall prevention in community dwelling adults 65 years of age and older who do not have osteoporosis or vitamin D deficiency (95703). The reasons for the disparate study results may have to do with the way in which clinical trials have reported outcomes. Clinical trials assessing the effect of vitamin D on fall risk may report results as the number of patients who experience one or more falls, the total number of falls, or the rate of falls per individual. This can affect ultimate conclusions and, in some cases, can be misleading. For example, when studies report on only the total number of falls, it is unclear if vitamin D reduces the rate of falls across the study population, or if it only reduces falls in a small subset of patients. Also, analyses of research suggest that the size of the clinical study appears to affect the trial results. Most trials showing significant reductions in fall risk have been small and of short duration (91342,94132); whereas larger and longer-term studies tend to show no benefit (13073,84399).
Fetal and premature infant mortality. Taking vitamin D during pregnancy might reduce the risk of fetal or early infant death. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy reduces the risk of intrauterine or neonatal death by 31% when compared with not supplementing with vitamin D. A sub-analysis shows that this benefit was limited to doses of up to 4000 IU daily (109055). However, a Cochrane review suggests that the evidence linking vitamin D supplementation to a lower risk of fetal or neonatal death is very uncertain (114587). Clinical practice guidelines from the Endocrine Society conditionally recommend, based on low certainty of evidence, empiric vitamin D supplementation from fortified foods, vitamin D supplements, or prenatal vitamin formulations that contain vitamin D during pregnancy to potentially lower the risk of intra-uterine and neonatal mortality, preeclampsia, preterm birth, and small for gestational age (SGA) birth. Empiric vitamin D supplementation is defined as supplementing with vitamin D above the Recommended Dietary Allowance without having tested serum vitamin D status (114502).
Fibromyalgia. A small clinical study suggests that vitamin D might improve pain in patients with fibromyalgia. Details: A small clinical study in fibromyalgia patients with low vitamin D levels shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1200-2400 IU daily seems to reduce pain, but not mood or quality of life, when compared with placebo (91349).
Food allergies. It is unclear if prenatal or infant oral vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of developing food allergies. Details: A meta-analysis of two large clinical studies shows that prenatal or infant vitamin D supplementation does not reduce the risk of developing food allergies when compared with low-dose vitamin D or no intervention (108438).
Frailty. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of frailty in older adults. Details: Frailty involves a combination of muscle loss and weakness, with exhaustion and reduced ability for physical activity. Some observational research has found that low vitamin D status is associated with frailty occurrence. However, clinical research in community dwelling older adults shows that taking vitamin D as 1000 IU, 2000 IU, or 4000 IU daily for 24 months does not prevent frailty or attenuate the worsening of frailty when compared with low-dose vitamin D 200 IU daily. Baseline vitamin D status did not affect these findings. Also, a sub-analysis suggests that vitamin D 2000 IU might increase frailty; however, only a small number of participants were randomized to this dose (109046). Other clinical research in community dwelling adults at least 70 years of age shows that taking cholecalciferol 2000 IU daily for 3 years does not reduce the odds of becoming pre-frail or frail over 36 months when compared with placebo. However, when taken in combination with omega-3 fatty acids 1 gram daily and a home exercise program, the odds of becoming pre-frail is reduced by 39% (110829).
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). A small clinical study suggests that vitamin D may modestly improve anxiety in patients with GAD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with GAD shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU once weekly for 3 months, in addition to taking an antidepressant and an anxiolytic, moderately reduces anxiety scores when compared with taking these medications alone (103654).
Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for improving outcomes in patients receiving HSCT. Details: A small clinical study in patients who have undergone an autologous HSCT shows that taking calcitriol 0.25 mcg three times daily for 30 days can reduce the time to absolute lymphocyte count recovery, but does not affect time to recovery of absolute neutrophil and platelet counts, when compared with placebo (103665).
Hepatitis C. Low levels of vitamin D have been associated with an inadequate response to hepatitis C therapy. Adding vitamin D to standard therapy for hepatitis C may improve viral response, especially in specific genotypes. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with hepatitis C genotypes 2-3 receiving standard therapy with PEG-interferon and ribavirin shows that adding vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 24 weeks results in 95% of patients achieving undetectable levels of hepatitis C RNA, compared to only 77% of patients treated with standard therapy alone (98917). Another small clinical study in patients with hepatitis C genotype 1b receiving the same standard therapy shows that adding vitamin D 1000 IU daily for 16 weeks results in about 79% of patients achieving undetectable levels of hepatitis C RNA, compared to about 55% of patients treated with standard therapy alone. The TT genotype seems to be especially susceptible to vitamin D supplementation, while TG/GG genotype does not seem to be susceptible (98923).
HIV/AIDS. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for improving bone mineral density (BMD) in children and young adults with HIV. Details: Vitamin D deficiency and hyperparathyroidism are common in children and young adults with HIV. A meta-analysis of two clinical trials in this population shows that taking cholecalciferol for 12 months does not improve spine BMD when compared with placebo. Also, an analysis of two clinical trials shows that taking doses of 1600 IU to 4000 IU daily does not improve spine BMD when compared with taking doses of 400-800 IU daily. However, taking higher dose vitamin D has a small beneficial effect on total BMD when compared with taking lower doses. There was no improvement on parathyroid hormone levels (110824). This meta-analysis is limited by the availability of small clinical trials, as well as the heterogeneous doses of vitamin D used in the included studies.
Hyperlipidemia. Although population research has found that higher vitamin D levels are associated with improved lipid levels, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial. Clinical research results are conflicting. Details: Population research has found that higher vitamin D levels are associated with lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels and higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels when compared with lower vitamin D levels (15630,98919). However, supplementation might not be beneficial. A meta-analysis of small clinical studies suggests that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol, ergocalciferol, alfacalcidol, or calcitriol slightly increases LDL cholesterol, but does not affect total cholesterol, triglycerides, or HDL cholesterol, when compared with placebo (84642). The validity of these findings is limited by the variability in patient populations, vitamin D dose and formulation, and study duration. Also, none of the included studies were prospectively designed to test the effect of vitamin D on lipid levels. Another meta-analysis of clinical studies in a mixed population of healthy adults and adults with metabolic disease shows that taking vitamin D 1400-50,000 IU weekly with calcium 500-2000 mg daily results in very modest improvements in total cholesterol, triglyceride, and HDL cholesterol levels, but not LDL or very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that effects are more pronounced in people with metabolic disease (107227). The validity of these findings is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies, which persisted throughout subgroup analyses.
Hyperthyroidism. Oral vitamin D has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Observational research suggests that serum vitamin D levels are decreased in patients with newly diagnosed Graves' disease. A small preliminary clinical trial in patients with newly diagnosed Graves' disease taking methimazole and low levels of selenium and vitamin D shows that taking vitamin D as cholecalciferol for 270 days, in combination with selenium for the first 180 days, modestly reduces levels of serum free thyroxine and improves quality of life when compared with no vitamin D or selenium. However, taking vitamin D and selenium did not affect levels of free triiodothyronine or positive thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor antibody (109049).
Hypothyroidism. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in the treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with vitamin D deficiency and subclinical hypothyroidism shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 2-12 weeks decreases mean thyroid stimulating hormone levels by about 20% when compared with placebo, or by 3.55 mIU/L when compared to baseline (107213,113589).
Ichthyosis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with inherited ichthyosis. Details: A small clinical study in patients with congenital non-syndromic ichthyosis shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 24 weeks reduces the clinical severity of disease at 12 weeks, but not 24 weeks, when compared with baseline. When compared with patients taking acitretin 0.5 mg/kg daily, results were similar at both 12 and 24 weeks, but it is unclear if the improvement from baseline differed between groups (108441).
IgA vasculitis. It is unclear if oral alfacalcidol is beneficial in children with IgA vasculitis. Details: A clinical study in children with IgA vasculitis shows that taking alfacalcidol 0.25 mcg daily along with vitamin C, rutin, dipyridamole, cimetidine, calcium, and glucocorticoids for 4 weeks improves rates of recurrence and incidence of kidney damage when compared with those receiving the same regimen without alfacalcidol. Alfacalcidol also improves cellular immune function and reduces levels of inflammatory biomarkers (107212).
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for IBS; the available research is conflicting. Details: Although some meta-analyses show that taking vitamin D is moderately more effective than placebo for improving IBS symptom severity and quality of life, other analyses disagree. Doses of vitamin D have included 50,000 IU weekly or every 2 weeks or 2000-4000 IU daily for up to 6 months (109041,109054,109057). The reasons for these discrepancies might be attributed to the inclusion criteria related to the individual trials, the small sample sizes, and varied dosing strategies used in the available research.
Kidney transplant. It is unclear if oral cholecalciferol is beneficial for improving allograft function or preventing non-skeletal complications in kidney transplant recipients. Details: Following a kidney transplant, patients are at increased risk of vitamin D insufficiency and related outcomes. A large clinical trial shows that taking a high dose of cholecalciferol for 2 years does not reduce the composite risk of developing type 2 diabetes, major cardiovascular events, or cancer, or death when compared to taking a lower dose. The high and low doses of vitamin D were 100,000 IU or 12,000 IU, respectively, every 2 weeks for 2 months, followed by monthly doses for the next 22 months (110830). The effect of a high dose of vitamin D on these outcomes individually is not clear. However, taking vitamin D does not seem to improve allograft function. A clinical study in kidney transplant recipients shows that taking cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily, beginning 1-month posttransplant and continuing for 11 months, has no effect on allograft function when compared with placebo (108425).
Kidney transplant-related bone loss. Oral vitamin D might be beneficial for preventing bone loss associated with kidney transplantation. Details: A large clinical trial shows that taking a high dose of cholecalciferol for 2 years modestly reduces the odds of a fracture by 76% when compared to taking a lower dose. The high and low doses of vitamin D were 100,000 IU or 12,000 IU, respectively, every 2 weeks for 2 months, followed by monthly doses for the next 22 months (110830). A prespecified secondary analysis of a clinical study in patients at 1-month post-kidney transplant from a living donor in Japan shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 4000 IU daily for months 1-12 posttransplant reduces whole blood parathyroid hormone levels by 15%, but does not alter levels of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5-b or bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, when compared with placebo. The greatest effects on parathyroid hormone levels are observed in those with more severe vitamin D deficiency, hypocalcemia, and more preserved kidney function. Vitamin D supplementation also attenuates changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, but not the distal radius, from prior to transplant. Patients taking vitamin D had a loss of only 0.2%, compared with a loss of 2% in those receiving placebo. The greatest effects are observed in those with osteoporosis or osteopenia (107220). Conversely, a small clinical trial shows that taking calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) 0.25 mcg daily in combination with calcium carbonate 500 mg daily does not decrease bone loss associated with kidney transplantation. However, calcitriol might reduce osteoclast suppression, help maintain trabecular bone volume and wall thickness, and improve axial BMD (4823).
Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). Taking vitamin D might slow prediabetes progression to diabetes in people with low baseline levels of vitamin D or in people achieving high levels of vitamin D following supplementation. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial in people with prediabetes and sufficient vitamin D levels. Details: Observational research has found that low vitamin D levels are linked with a higher risk of prediabetes and higher dietary vitamin D is linked with a lower chance of developing diabetes (84594,103669). Meta-analyses and individual clinical studies in patients with prediabetes and unclear or sufficient vitamin D levels show that vitamin D supplementation might improve some glycemic indices, but does not seem to prevent progression of prediabetes to diabetes (84594,91347,99769,108421). However, a more recent meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies designed to evaluate the preventative effects of oral vitamin D shows that taking it in the form of cholecalciferol 4000 IU daily or 20,000 IU weekly or eldecalcitol 0.75 mcg daily reduces the risk of developing diabetes with an absolute risk reduction of 3.3% over 3 years when compared with placebo. However, the actual risk reduction is highly dependent on vitamin D status. Patients achieving the highest serum vitamin D levels have absolute 3-year risk reductions of 11.4% to 18.1% (110810). In patients with vitamin D deficiency and prediabetes, vitamin D might improve beta-cell function, suggesting reduced disease progression (99768,107210). One clinical study in adults with vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 3 months, and then monthly for 3 months, modestly improves insulin resistance and beta-cell function as measured by the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), but does not affect fasting or postprandial glucose levels when compared with placebo (99768). Further, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients with vitamin D deficiency and prediabetes shows that oral vitamin D at a median dose of 50,000 IU weekly for 26 weeks modestly improves fasting blood glucose and some markers of islet function, but not postprandial blood glucose or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, when compared with control. Additionally, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving vitamin D supplementation regressed from prediabetes to normal glucose status (107210). A meta-analysis of clinical studies in overweight or obese children and adolescents shows that high doses of vitamin D, 4000 IU daily or higher for 12-52 weeks, reduce HOMA-IR and C-reactive protein levels, but do not affect body weight, cholesterol, or parathyroid hormone (113596). A study in females with vitamin D deficiency and prediabetes shows that taking vitamin D 60,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose of 200 IU daily, has no effect on the incidence of type 2 diabetes at 2 years (107211). Clinical practice guidelines from the Endocrine Society conditionally recommend, with moderate certainty of evidence, empiric vitamin D supplementation in addition to lifestyle modification for adults with high-risk prediabetes to reduce the risk of progression to diabetes. Empiric vitamin D supplementation is defined as vitamin D from supplements or fortified food above the Recommended Dietary Allowance without having tested serum vitamin D status (114502).
Infant development. It is unclear if giving oral vitamin D in doses above the recommended dietary allowance during infancy is beneficial for improving neurodevelopment. It is also unclear if oral vitamin D during pregnancy is beneficial for improving cognitive development in the offspring. Details: Clinical research shows that giving vitamin D 1200 IU daily to healthy term infants of Northern European ethnicity starting at 2 weeks of age does not improve measures of neurodevelopment at 2 years of age when compared with giving the standard dose of vitamin D 400 IU (106121). Overall, the evidence from population research is mixed as to whether vitamin D status during gestation is associated with infant developmental outcomes. However, some population research has found that increased vitamin D status during pregnancy is associated with improved anthropomorphic and neurodevelopmental outcomes (104621,105724). Two meta-analyses of observational research show that low vitamin D status during pregnancy is associated with reduced head circumference and cognitive development scores, and higher odds of the offspring developing autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (105724,105725). However, one meta-analysis suggests these risks may be limited to those with very low vitamin D status (serum level < 12 ng/mL) (105724). Multiple meta-analyses show that vitamin D status during pregnancy does not appear to affect motor development (105724,105725). In one observational study, plasma vitamin D concentrations in the second trimester of pregnancy was associated with increased IQ scores in the offspring at age 4-6 years. Each 10 ng/mL increase in vitamin D levels was associated with a 1.17-point increase in IQ (104621). In contrast, clinical research shows that taking vitamin D3 2800 IU daily during the third trimester does not improve neurodevelopmental outcomes in the first 6 years of life when compared to taking lower doses of 400 IU daily (104623).
Infertility. It is unclear if oral or intramuscular vitamin D is beneficial in females with infertility. Details: Observational research in females undergoing in vitro fertilization suggests no association between dietary vitamin D intake and oocyte quality, successful embryo transfer, clinical pregnancy rate, or term pregnancy rate (112097). Additionally, a meta-analysis of clinical research in females with infertility shows that, although there was no effect of taking vitamin D on implantation rate or miscarriage, taking vitamin D increases the odds of clinical pregnancy by 49% when compared with placebo. However, sub-analyses of clinical and observational research found that benefits on clinical pregnancy rates were limited to populations with vitamin D insufficiency, but not vitamin D deficiency, and for doses between 1000 to 10,000 IU daily for 30-90 days (110818). Most studies included in the analysis used oral vitamin D; however, intramuscular vitamin D was used in one cohort study. A smaller meta-analysis of clinical studies in females with infertility and vitamin D insufficiency undergoing IVF shows that taking vitamin D increases the rate of chemical pregnancy by 50%, but has no effect on the clinical pregnancy rate (108432).
Lichen planus. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for lichen planus. Details: A small clinical study in patients with oral lichen planus and vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency shows that taking vitamin D 60,000 IU weekly in combination with systemic steroids for 1 month reduces pain severity and improves healing of lesions when compared with systemic steroids alone (114586). The validity of the study is limited by the lack of a placebo.
Low birth weight. It is unclear if oral vitamin D can reduce the risk for low birth weight; the available evidence is conflicting. Details: A meta-analysis of observational research has found that a very low vitamin D status (serum level <12 ng/mL) during pregnancy is associated with lower birth weight and increased odds of SGA births. However, these risks have not been demonstrated in those with less severe vitamin D deficiency (serum level <20 ng/mL) (105724). Most research also shows that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy reduces the risk of low birth weight. A meta-analysis of three clinical trials shows that supplementation with vitamin D 800-1000 IU daily starting between 27 and 32 weeks' gestation, or 200,000 IU administered as a single dose or in two divided doses during the seventh and eighth month of pregnancy, reduces the risk of delivering a low birth weight infant by 60% (84659). Other meta-analyses of clinical research show that supplementation with vitamin D during pregnancy results in a 31% to 60% reduced risk of low birth weight and a 103 gram greater average birth weight when compared with placebo or no intervention (99766,114587). However, some meta-analyses show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of low birth weight when compared with no supplementation (95910,109055). One meta-analysis that included studies that did not directly measure birth weight shows no effect of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on the rate of low birth weight, despite showing an increase in overall birth weight of about 58 grams (95910).
Lung cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D prevents lung cancer or improves lung cancer prognosis. Details: A small meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational research has found that high intake of vitamin D is associated with a 10% reduction in the risk of developing lung cancer when compared with low vitamin D intake. In terms of prognosis, high vitamin D intake is associated with improvements in both overall survival and relapse-free survival (107217).
Male infertility. It is unclear if oral cholecalciferol is beneficial in males with infertility. Details: A small clinical study in males with infertility shows that taking cholecalciferol 2500 IU daily for 6 months modestly improves progressive sperm motility, sperm concentration, and sperm morphology when compared with baseline (108427). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
Melanoma. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with melanoma. Details: A meta-analysis of 14 observational studies suggests that vitamin D deficiency is associated with a 45% greater risk of melanoma when compared with normal vitamin D levels (112027). However, a small clinical study in patients with newly resected stage II melanoma shows that taking vitamin D3 100,000 IU every 50 days for 3 years does not improve disease-free survival when compared with placebo. Most patients in this study had vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency at baseline (106113).
Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing or treating metabolic syndrome. Details: In patients with metabolic syndrome, clinical research shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 16 weeks does not affect most metabolic or anthropometric factors when compared with placebo, although there was a modest decrease in triglyceride levels (106123). However, almost all of the individuals in this study were vitamin D deficient or insufficient, and many remained in that category even after supplementation. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation is beneficial in vitamin D sufficient patients with metabolic syndrome. There is conflicting evidence about the association between vitamin D and metabolic syndrome (14265,16713,98234). Some population research has found that higher vitamin D levels are associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome, while other research found no association (14265,16713). Furthermore, a small clinical trial in patients with metabolic syndrome shows that taking vitamin D 20,000 IU or 40,000 IU weekly for 8 weeks does not affect metabolic risk factors when compared with placebo (98234).
Migraine headache. It is unclear if oral vitamin D reduces the frequency of migraine. Details: A meta-analysis of three small high-quality clinical studies in patients with migraine shows that taking vitamin D 2000 or 4000 IU daily for 12-24 weeks or 500,000 IU weekly for 2 months reduces the frequency of migraines by 2-3 attacks monthly when compared with usual care or placebo (108439).
Miscarriage. Oral vitamin D has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in pregnant adults with threatened miscarriage between the 6th and 13th week of gestation shows that taking a specific combination product (DAV HA, Lo.Li pharma s.r.l) containing vitamin D 50 mcg, alpha-lipoic acid, hyaluronic acid, magnesium, and vitamin B6 daily in combination with conventional treatment of vaginal progesterone over 2 weeks of observation results in a faster resorption of the subchorionic hematoma and faster decrease of patient-reported vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, and uterine contractions when compared with vaginal progesterone alone (113893). It is unclear if these effects are due to vitamin D, other ingredients, or the combination. Additionally, the validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a placebo for the control group.
Multiple sclerosis (MS). Although vitamin D supplementation has been linked with a lower risk of developing MS, taking oral vitamin D supplements does not seem to reduce MS relapses. Details: Vitamin D deficiency appears to be linked to the risk of MS development and progression. Population research suggests that long-term supplementation with vitamin D 400 IU is associated with a 40% lower risk of MS in females. The effect seems to be dose-dependent. Consumption of at least 400 IU daily, mainly in the form of a multivitamin supplement, appears to have the greatest protective effect (11356). Additional population research in over 7 million people suggests that higher levels of calcifediol are associated with a lower risk of developing MS. In white adults, for every 20 ng/mL increase in vitamin D levels, there appears to be a 41% decrease in MS risk. However, this was not found in black and Hispanic adults (15159). Vitamin D supplementation has also been examined in patients with MS. Population research suggests that taking vitamin D supplements and the maintenance of optimal blood levels of vitamin D are associated with a reduction in the development of new areas of demyelination detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over 24 months. However, there are no correlations between vitamin D consumption or vitamin D blood levels and clinical outcomes (110816). Also, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to impact MS relapses or most symptoms in patients with MS. Meta-analyses of preliminary clinical research show that vitamin D supplementation does not affect the rate of MS relapses, overall symptoms, disability scores, or the number of MS nerve lesions detected by MRI, regardless whether the vitamin D was low-dose or high-dose (98192,98914,106119,113586). However, one meta-analysis of 6 small clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D for 8-96 weeks slightly improves fatigue scores when compared with placebo (112024). These analyses are limited by the small size and heterogeneity of most of the included studies and variability in dosing and duration of vitamin D regimens.
Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral vitamin D improves muscle strength in middle aged or older adults with low or sufficient levels of vitamin D. The available research is conflicting. Details: Clinical research in healthy older adults who are not deficient in vitamin D shows that oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation, with 800 IU, 1000 IU, or 2000 IU daily or 50,000 IU monthly, alone or in combination with a resistance training program, does not increase muscle strength when compared with placebo (11814,104619,108429). In patients 40-80 years of age with low vitamin D levels, taking vitamin D3 100,000 IU (2500 mcg) once, followed by 20,000 IU (500 mcg) weekly for 4 months, does not improve muscle strength when compared with placebo (103658). Similarly, meta-analyses of clinical research show that vitamin D does not increase grip strength, muscle mass, global muscle strength, or back extensor strength when compared with control (91341,113595). However, some research has found some benefit with the use of vitamin D supplements. One meta-analysis shows that taking vitamin D increases grip strength after menopause when compared with placebo or low-dose vitamin D, although a sub-analysis shows that beneficial effects are limited to individuals aged 60-69 years, when vitamin D is taken without calcium, when baseline vitamin D levels are at least 30 ng/mL, or when the treatment consists of the vitamin D analog alfacalcidol. This suggests heterogeneity between studies (109048). Another meta-analysis in elderly adults shows that taking vitamin D as calcifediol 10-30 mcg daily for a median of 24 weeks modestly improves hand grip strength and leg extension, but not leg flexion, when compared with baseline (109042). Also, some individual clinical research in older adults with low levels of vitamin D at baseline shows that taking vitamin D3 800 IU daily or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) 1000 IU daily for 12 months in combination with calcium 1000 mg daily modestly improves lower extremity or hip strength by 8% to 23% when compared with calcium alone (38915,84530).
Myalgia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for reducing myalgia associated with obesity. Details: Preliminary clinical research in obese individuals with vitamin D deficiency who are on a low-calorie diet shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly, alone or in combination with an aerobic exercise program three times weekly for 12 weeks, modestly reduces muscle pain when compared with only aerobic exercise three times weekly (106118).
Myelodysplastic syndromes. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Details: A small observational study in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes has found that taking calcitriol or calcifediol orally is associated with slowed disease progression (11825).
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral or intramuscular vitamin D is beneficial in children or adults with NAFLD. Details: Although findings from individual research are mixed, one meta-analysis of mainly small clinical trials in patients with NAFLD shows that vitamin D modestly improves insulin resistance and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, with no effect on serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels. Most studies included in the analysis used oral vitamin D 1000 IU daily or 50,000 IU weekly or biweekly for 3-6 months and compared with placebo; however, one study used a single intramuscular injection of vitamin D 600,000 IU compared with lifestyle modifications (109056). Vitamin D has also been evaluated in combination with fish oil. A clinical study in adults with NAFLD shows that taking oral vitamin D3 1680 IU daily in combination with fish oil or fish oil alone for 3 months improves serum ALT levels similarly to a control group (107186). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for use in children with NAFLD. One clinical study in children with obesity and biopsy-proven NAFLD shows that taking oral vitamin D3 2000 IU daily for 6 months with a hypocaloric diet improves liver histopathology in terms of steatosis, lobular inflammation, and NAFLD activity score at 6 months, but not hepatocyte ballooning or fibrosis, when compared with baseline. These improvements were not seen in the group receiving placebo with a hypocaloric diet, but it is unclear if the improvement from baseline differed between groups (107222).
Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking vitamin D3 1000 IU daily for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking vitamin D3 with calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate reduces the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but has no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma. Vitamin D taken alone has no effect on the risk for either type of cancer (104622).
Obesity. The evidence for the use of oral vitamin D in obesity is conflicting and unclear. Details: Population research has found that people with lower vitamin D levels are significantly more likely to be obese when compared to people with higher vitamin D levels (15630). Also, a large-scale, high-quality clinical trial in postmenopausal adults taking calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily for 3 years shows that these patients are more likely to lose weight and maintain their weight when compared with those taking placebo. This beneficial effect is mainly seen in females who have inadequate intake of calcium, less than 1200 mg/day, before starting a calcium supplement (15604). However, other evidence suggests that vitamin D alone does not improve weight loss. One clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D3 2000 IU/day without calcium for 12 months does not increase weight loss when compared with placebo in overweight and obese postmenopausal adults who are deficient in vitamin D at baseline (91345).
Orthostatic hypotension. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for prevention of orthostatic hypotension. Details: A secondary analysis of a clinical study in older patients with vitamin D insufficiency who are at an increased risk for falls shows that taking vitamin D 1000-4000 IU daily for up to 2 years has no effect on the risk of orthostatic hypotension or orthostatic symptoms when compared with those receiving vitamin D 200 IU daily (107223).
Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for osteoarthritis. Details: The evidence for the use of vitamin D in osteoarthritis is conflicting. Some clinical research shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily, or at a higher dose to reach serum vitamin D levels over 36 ng/mL, for 2 years does not reduce knee pain or loss of cartilage when compared with placebo in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (84688). However, another clinical study shows that taking vitamin D3 daily for 10 days and then vitamin D3 60,000 IU monthly for 12 months modestly reduces pain and improves function when compared with placebo in patients with osteoarthritis and vitamin D insufficiency (98199). It is possible that higher doses of vitamin D have an effect on osteoarthritis, while lower doses do not. Due to this conflicting and low-quality evidence, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommends against the use of vitamin D for any form of osteoarthritis (102114).
Otitis media. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with otitis media. Details: The relationship between vitamin D status and otitis media is unclear. Population research has found that having otitis media is associated with lower blood levels of vitamin D; however, lower vitamin D levels were not associated with greater risk of otitis media (98194).
Overactive bladder. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for overactive bladder in children or adults. Details: A large clinical trial in older males shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily for 5 years does not reduce the odds of weekly overactive bladder when compared with placebo. In males with low baseline serum vitamin D, taking vitamin D reduces the odds of overactive bladder at 5 years by 49%, including 34% reduced odds of overactive bladder with urinary incontinence and 81% reduced odds of overactive bladder without incontinence. However, urinary incontinence while sleeping or napping was increased (109738). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for overactive bladder in children with low vitamin D levels. A large, single-blind clinical study in children with overactive bladder without urinary incontinence, and with vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency, shows that taking vitamin D 2400 IU daily for 8 weeks with standard urotherapy reduces voiding frequency by about 3 or 4 voids daily when compared with standard urotherapy, with or without solifenacin 5 mg daily (115574,115591). Standard urotherapy was defined in this study as medical education, timed voiding, and pelvic floor muscle training.
Overall mortality. Taking oral vitamin D alone does not seem to reduce mortality; however, there is some evidence that taking certain forms of vitamin D with calcium might have a modest benefit. Details: While higher vitamin D levels have been associated with a small reduction in mortality when compared with lower vitamin D levels (98187), clinical research shows that taking vitamin D does not reduce the risk of mortality. A comprehensive meta-analysis shows that vitamin D supplementation alone does not reduce all-cause mortality when compared to control (100900). However, giving vitamin D with calcium may modestly reduce the risk of mortality. Meta-analyses show a 4% to 9% reduced risk of mortality when trials of vitamin D alone and vitamin D with calcium are pooled together (16102,97296,98186,112022). Finally, some research suggests that the type of vitamin D supplementation might influence the results. A meta-analysis of clinical research found that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) with or without calcium reduces mortality risk by 6%, while alfacalcidol, calcitriol, and vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) do not have benefit (84595,98186). Other clinical research suggests that vitamin D supplementation in older adults may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality by about 4%, with an estimated effect size of 6 fewer deaths per 1000 individuals. This finding informed the 2024 Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines on vitamin D for the prevention of disease in the general population. The Endocrine Society conditionally recommends, with moderate certainty of evidence, empiric vitamin D supplementation from fortified foods or vitamin D-containing supplements in the general population aged 75 years and older to potentially lower the risk of mortality. Empiric vitamin D is defined as vitamin D above the Recommended Dietary Allowance without having tested serum vitamin D status. For empiric supplementation and for those who have indications for vitamin D treatment or supplementation, daily lower-dose versus intermittent higher doses was suggested (114502).
Pain (chronic). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for chronic pain. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research in patients with chronic pain shows that taking vitamin D for 1-24 months produces a 43% greater decrease in pain score when compared with placebo. However, the final follow-up pain score is similar for both groups (96402). The effect of vitamin D on pain based on pain-related diagnosis, vitamin D status, or dose is unknown.
Parkinson disease. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for this condition. Details: Population research found that higher levels of vitamin D are associated with milder Parkinson disease symptoms, while deficiency is associated with increased risk of Parkinson disease (97000,99772). One small study shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1200 IU daily for one year might modestly slow the progression of Parkinson disease based on the Hoehn and Yars staging criteria. However, there was no improvement in disease severity according to the more widely used Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Stage (UPDRS). The UPDRS includes measures of activities of daily living and non-motor symptoms. Vitamin D had no effect on most quality of life measures (95915).
Periodontitis. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for periodontal disease. Details: A meta-analysis of mostly observational research suggests that vitamin D levels are not associated with an increased or decreased risk of periodontitis (112026). Other population research suggests that higher blood levels of vitamin D may be associated with a reduced risk of periodontal disease in adults 50 years of age or older. However, this association was not found for adults younger than 50 years (15634).
Physical performance. It is unclear if oral vitamin D improves muscle strength in elderly adults. Details: Some clinical research in healthy older adults who are not deficient in vitamin D shows that oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation, with 800 IU, 1000 IU, or 2000 IU daily or 50,000 IU monthly, alone or in combination with a resistance training program, does not improve physical performance when compared with placebo (11814,104619,108429). Also, results from one meta-analysis of clinical research in postmenopausal females with low levels of vitamin D shows that taking vitamin D does not improve the timed up and go test when compared with placebo or low-dose vitamin D (109048). One meta-analysis that included studies specifically evaluating the use of calcifediol in older adults shows a large benefit on gait speed; however, only one study included in the analysis used this endpoint and other measures of physical performance were not affected (109042).
Pneumonia. High-dose oral vitamin D does not reduce pneumonia severity in children. Details: Although vitamin D supplementation might prevent respiratory tract infections in children, it might not prevent recurrent pneumonia. A small clinical study in children under 5 years of age with recurrent pneumonia and variable vitamin D blood levels shows that taking vitamin D 300,000 IU quarterly for 1 year does not reduce respiratory infections, severity of pneumonia, hospital admissions, or disease complications when compared with placebo (103667). However, it's unknown if vitamin D supplementation using lower and more frequent doses, or supplementation in patients with vitamin D deficiency, might be beneficial. Some observational research has found that having vitamin D deficiency is linked to a higher risk for developing community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) (102118). For information on other respiratory infections, refer to the Respiratory Tract Infection discussion.
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if vitamin D improves pregnancy rates and outcomes, clinical symptoms, metabolic parameters, or hormone levels in patients with PCOS. Details: Observational research in adults with infertility, PCOS, and insulin resistance suggests that normal vitamin D levels are associated with better embryo quality and increased pregnancy rate when compared with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency (100834). It is unclear if supplementation with vitamin D improves pregnancy rates in patients with PCOS. A meta-analysis of several mostly low-quality clinical studies in patients with PCOS and vitamin D deficiency at baseline shows that intramuscular or oral vitamin D 200-10,000 IU daily for up to 24 weeks in addition to fertility treatment improves pregnancy rates and reduces premature miscarriage and premature delivery, but does not impact the incidence of pregnancy complications including gestational hypertension or gestational diabetes, when compared with control. This analysis also suggests vitamin D supplementation improves certain IVF-related outcomes including ovulation rate, fertilization rate, and number of mature oocytes (112787). An earlier meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking vitamin D 400-12,000 IU daily for 2-6 months improves follicular development when compared with placebo. Taking vitamin D in combination with metformin 1500 mg daily also appears to increase the number of regular menstrual cycles by 85% when compared with metformin alone, but without an effect on follicular development (96404). However, a meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies shows that combining vitamin D with metformin probably does not improve menstrual cycle regulation when compared with metformin alone (113594). The effect of vitamin D on the hormonal and metabolic profiles of patients with PCOS has also been evaluated. An umbrella review of up to 15 meta-analyses of clinical studies in patients with PCOS shows that taking vitamin D 2000-8500 IU daily for 6.5-13.5 weeks reduces levels of serum triglycerides, total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and total testosterone, but not body mass index (BMI) or insulin levels, when compared with placebo (115577). A separate meta-analysis of 9 clinical studies, not included in the umbrella review, shows that combining vitamin D with metformin reduces insulin resistance, BMI, and testosterone levels when compared with metformin alone (113594). Additionally, a small clinical study in adults with PCOS and vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency shows that taking vitamin D 2000 IU daily in combination with diet and exercise for 12 weeks reduces insulin resistance, BMI, waist to hip ratio, serum triglyceride levels, and total and LDL cholesterol levels when compared with diet and exercise alone (114580). The interpretation of the results in this clinical study is limited by the lack of a placebo control.
Post-stroke fatigue. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for post-stroke fatigue. Details: A retrospective study in patients with post-stroke fatigue and vitamin D deficiency suggests that vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 600 IU daily is associated with improvements in fatigue severity at months 1 and 3 when compared with control. Neurologic disability also showed improvement at 3 months, but not at 1 month, when compared with control. It is unclear if improvements from baseline differed between groups (107225).
Pre-eclampsia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D during pregnancy is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of pre-eclampsia. Details: While some clinical research suggests that taking vitamin D during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia (113585,114587), clinical practice guidelines from the Endocrine Society conditionally recommend, based on low certainty of evidence, empiric vitamin D supplementation from daily intake of fortified foods, vitamin D supplements, or prenatal vitamin formulations that contain vitamin D during pregnancy to potentially lower the risk of preeclampsia, intra-uterine mortality, preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA) birth, and neonatal mortality. Empiric vitamin D supplementation is defined as supplementing with vitamin D above the Recommended Dietary Allowance without having tested serum vitamin D status (114502).
Precocious puberty. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of precocious puberty. Details: A meta-analysis of 43 mostly observational studies from China suggests that vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency is associated with 2.25-fold greater odds of precocious puberty when compared with normal vitamin D levels. Taking vitamin D 200-1000 IU daily for 3-12 months along with a gonadotropic-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa) is associated with lower luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and estradiol levels and reduced bone age when compared with GnRHa therapy alone (112019). Another meta-analysis of 15 studies, mainly from China and with high heterogeneity and publication bias, suggests that there is a negative correlation between serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D concentrations and precocious puberty, and that vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of precocious puberty by about 53% (113578).
Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for patients with gestational hypertension. Details: Meta-analyses of two low-quality clinical trials show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk for gestational hypertension when compared with control (95910,114587).
Prematurity. It is unclear if taking vitamin D during pregnancy prevents respiratory complications in preterm neonates. Details: A large clinical study in pregnant patients with gestational age less than 34 weeks and at risk of preterm delivery shows that a single intramuscular injection of vitamin D 50,000 IU within 72 hours before delivery decreases the risk of respiratory distress syndrome treated by surfactant in the neonate by about 2.25-fold and increases the 5th minute APGAR scores, but not 1st minute APGAR scores, gestational age, neonatal intensive care unit admission, length of hospital stay, or delivery method, when compared with no treatment (114581).
Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with PMS. Details: Observational research has found that increasing dietary intake of vitamin D above 706 IU daily is linked to a reduced risk of developing PMS when compared with consuming 112 IU daily (13094). Furthermore, a clinical study shows that taking vitamin D 400 IU daily in combination with calcium 1000 mg daily can decrease the severity of PMS symptoms (16869). Another clinical study in adolescent females with PMS shows that taking vitamin D3 50,000 IU weekly for 9 weeks modestly reduces PMS symptoms when compared to baseline (98912). A small clinical study in young adults with PMS and vitamin D deficiency shows that taking vitamin D 50,000 IU every 2 weeks for 16 weeks reduces psychological symptom scores by 54% and physical symptom scores by 39% when compared with placebo (113582).
Preterm labor. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for preterm labor. Details: Vitamin D deficiency, defined as serum levels less than 20 ng/mL, during pregnancy has been associated with a 25% greater risk of preterm birth (95911). The risk seems to be especially prominent in those with darker colored skin (103662). However, meta-analyses of clinical research show that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of a preterm birth when compared with no supplementation with vitamin D (84659,95910,109055,114587). The effect vitamin D specifically in vitamin D-deficient patients is still unclear. Some small, heterogeneous, and low-quality studies show that vitamin D supplementation might reduce the rate of preterm birth in vitamin D-deficient patients (84659,95910). Additional studies are needed to determine the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the risk of preterm birth. Clinical practice guidelines from the Endocrine Society conditionally recommend, based on low certainty of evidence, empiric vitamin D supplementation from daily intake of fortified foods, vitamin D supplements, or prenatal vitamin formulations that contain vitamin D during pregnancy to potentially lower the risk of preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA) birth, preeclampsia, intra-uterine mortality, and neonatal mortality. Empiric vitamin D supplementation iss defined as supplementing with vitamin D above the Recommended Dietary Allowance without having tested serum vitamin D status (114502).
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Small clinical studies suggest that oral vitamin D may not improve symptoms in patients with RA. Details: Population research has found that higher intake of vitamin D from foods or supplements is associated with a lower risk of developing RA (12206,98200). However, a meta-analysis of two small clinical trials shows that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce pain or recurrence of RA when compared with placebo (98190).
Rhinosinusitis. Oral vitamin D has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients over 12 years of age with chronic sinusitis shows that taking 1 or 2 sachets of a specific combination product (Flogostop Forte, Humana Italia) containing vitamin D 600 IU, black currant, Boswellia serrata, and bromelain along with a nasal corticosteroid daily for 15-30 days reduces symptoms of nasal hyperemia and rhinorrhea when compared with corticosteroid nasal spray alone (111501). It is unclear if these findings are due to vitamin D, other ingredients, or the combination.
Sarcopenia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in older adults with sarcopenia. Details: A meta-analysis of randomized trials in older adults with sarcopenia shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 100-800 IU daily, with protein 10-44 grams daily or amino acids 2.5-6 grams daily, for 2-6 months moderately improves muscle strength, but not muscle mass or walking speed, when compared with placebo (105727). The validity of this study is limited by high heterogeneity and an unreported baseline vitamin D status. Similarly, a small network meta-analysis of randomized trials shows that taking vitamin D 500-1600 IU daily or 2500-5000 IU weekly with protein 20-80 grams daily or amino acids 3-32 grams daily with and without exercise for 3-18 months increases hand grip strength and shortens time to chair-stand, respectively, but not gait speed or lower-limb mass when compared with usual care (107221). It is unclear if these effects are due to vitamin D, protein/amino acid supplementation, exercise, or the combinations.
Schizophrenia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for schizophrenia. Details: Based on preliminary clinical evidence, Guidelines from The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce state that vitamin D in doses of 1500 to 4000 IU daily is not recommended for adjunctive use in patients with schizophrenia (110318). A moderate-sized clinical study in patients with schizophrenia shows that taking a specific combination product (BioZenD, Tak Gen Zist Pharmaceutical Company) containing vitamin D 400 IU in combination with a blend of probiotics (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Bifidobacterium longum, Bacillus coagulans) 2 x 10⁹ CFU daily for 12 weeks improves cognitive function scores but does not improve the severity of positive and negative schizophrenia symptoms when compared with placebo (114582). It is unclear if this effect is due to vitamin D, the probiotics, or the combination.
Sciatica. Oral vitamin D has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary research in adults up to 45 years of age with discogenic sciatica shows that taking cholecalciferol 800 IU with alpha-lipoic acid, acetyl-L-carnitine, and resveratrol daily for 30 days, in combination with a 20-session rehabilitation protocol, improves pain, disability, and quality of life when compared with the supplements alone or the rehabilitation protocol alone (112933).
Seasonal affective disorder (SAD). One small study suggests that a large dose of oral vitamin D can improve symptoms of SAD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with SAD suggests that a single dose of vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) 100,000 IU improves symptoms after one month when compared to baseline (83791). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
Seborrheic keratosis. It is unclear if topical vitamin D analogues improve symptoms of seborrheic keratosis. Details: Preliminary clinical research suggests that topical ointments containing activated vitamin D in the form of tacalcitol, calcipotriol or maxacalcitol, applied for 3-12 months, can reduce tumor volume by at least 40% in 75% of patients with seborrheic keratosis. Additionally, over 30% of patients seem to experience complete tumor resolution or a reduction in tumor volume of at least 80% (84033). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a control group.
Sexual dysfunction. One small study suggests that injecting a large dose of vitamin D might improve sexual function. Details: A small clinical study in females with vitamin D deficiency and sexual dysfunction shows that receiving an intramuscular injection of vitamin D as cholecalciferol 300,000 IU once at baseline and a second time 4 weeks later improves sexual function at 4 and 8 weeks when compared with placebo (100896).
Sickle cell disease. One small study suggests that oral vitamin D reduces pain and improves quality of life in children with sickle cell disease with vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency. Details: A small clinical study in children with sickle cell disease shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 40,000-100,000 IU weekly for 6 weeks reduces days with pain and improves physical activity and quality of life for up to 6 months when compared with placebo. Of the children included in the study, 82.5% had vitamin D insufficiency, while 52.5% were deficient in vitamin D (98918). It is unclear if vitamin D is effective for patients with sickle cell disease who have adequate levels of vitamin D.
Small for gestational age (SGA). It is unclear if oral vitamin D can reduce the risk for SGA births; the available evidence is conflicting. Details: Two meta-analyses of clinical research show no effect of vitamin D on the risk of SGA birth (84659,109055). However, one meta-analysis shows a 40% reduction in the risk of SGA births with vitamin D supplementation (95910). Also, one meta-analysis shows that when vitamin D supplementation is initiated before the 20^th week of gestation, the risk of SGA is reduced by 54% (109055). Most individual clinical trials are small and heterogeneous. Also, the formulation of vitamin D and/or vitamin D status at baseline may explain part of the discrepant findings. For example, a meta-analysis of observational research has found that a very low vitamin D status (serum level <12 ng/mL) during pregnancy is associated with increased odds of SGA births. This association does not seem to be present with less severe vitamin D deficiency (serum level <20 ng/mL) (105724). Clinical practice guidelines from the Endocrine Society conditionally recommend, with low certainty of evidence, empiric vitamin D supplementation from daily intake of fortified foods, vitamin D supplements, or prenatal vitamin formulations that contain vitamin D during pregnancy to potentially lower the risk of SGA births, as well as preeclampsia, intra-uterine mortality, preterm birth, and neonatal mortality. Empiric vitamin D supplementation is defined as supplementing with vitamin D above the Recommended Dietary Allowance without having tested serum vitamin D status (114502).
Statin-induced myalgia. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for patients with statin-induced myalgia. Details: Observational research has found that taking oral vitamin D supplements is associated with decreased symptoms of myalgia in patients taking statin drugs. In a small case series, patients who discontinued statins due to myalgia were able to resume statin therapy after starting vitamin D supplements. The majority of patients with myalgia were found to be vitamin D deficient, with vitamin D levels less than 12 ng/mL at baseline (16829). An observational study has also found that administering 50,000 units of vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) once a week for 12 weeks reversed symptoms of myalgia in 92% of statin treated patients with low serum vitamin D levels of less than 32 ng/mL (16831).
Stroke. Although low vitamin D levels are associated with higher risk of stroke, taking vitamin D supplements does not seem to reduce stroke risk. Details: Population research has found that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk of stroke. Furthermore, increased dietary intake of vitamin D is associated with a reduced risk of stroke (15630,16618,93944,97303,106106). However, clinical research shows that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce stroke risk. Several meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials show that taking vitamin D alone or with calcium does not reduce the risk of stroke in patients with or without cardiovascular disease risk factors (16616,91343,97296,97308,106106,112022). It is difficult to draw firm conclusions from these studies, as they did not assess whether patients had adequate vitamin D levels at baseline. It is unclear if vitamin D supplementation might prevent strokes in patients with vitamin D deficiency.
Sunburn. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin D for the treatment of sunburns, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin D for this purpose.
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with SLE. Details: While some observational research has found that adults with SLE are more likely to have vitamin D deficiency than healthy controls (102119), a small cross-sectional study in females has found no association between serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, SLE disease activity, and the presence or absence of lupus nephritis (107214). A meta-analysis of three small clinical studies shows that taking vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily or 50,000 IU weekly seems to reduce anti-dsDNA positive, a marker of disease activity, when compared with placebo in patients with SLE (98190). However, the clinical significance of this finding is unclear. A small clinical trial in females with SLE shows that taking vitamin D3 5000 IU daily for 12 weeks modestly improves overall disease activity, but not quality of life, when compared with placebo (109735).
Thyroid cancer. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with thyroid cancer. Details: Observational research in patients undergoing thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer suggests that taking vitamin D daily for at least 6 months after surgery is associated with a 38% lower risk of all-cause mortality and a 33% lower risk of total cancer-related mortality when compared with no vitamin D supplementation at around 10 years' follow-up. However, vitamin D does not appear to be linked to a lower risk of thyroid cancer-related mortality in these patients (112018).
Ulcerative colitis. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D may be beneficial in patients with ulcerative colitis. Details: A meta-analysis of mainly small clinical trials in patients treated with mesalazine shows that taking vitamin D for up to 24 weeks modestly increases clinical efficacy and reduces disease score when compared with mesalazine alone (109044). Also, a meta-analysis of small, low-quality clinical studies in patients with IBD, including Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, shows that taking high- or low-dose vitamin D for up to 1 year reduces the rate of relapse when compared with control (98915). These findings are limited because of the heterogeneity of the included studies.
Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for dementia. Details: A large clinical trial shows that taking vitamin D 2800 IU daily, starting at gestational week 24 and continuing until one week after birth, reduces the risk of the child developing croup by 3 years of age by 40% when compared with olive oil as placebo. This risk reduction did not change after adjusting for the use of omega-3 fatty acids 2.4 grams daily, as well as for concomitant persistent wheeze and/or lower respiratory tract infections (109304).
Urinary incontinence. Limited evidence suggests that vitamin D may be beneficial in middle-aged, but not older, adults with urinary incontinence. Details: Clinical research in middle-aged premenopausal females with stress urinary incontinence and low vitamin D status shows that taking vitamin D 5000 IU once weekly for 12 weeks has a moderate to large beneficial effect on the severity of incontinence and quality of life when compared with placebo. Kegel exercises were performed by all participants (109736). However, vitamin D supplementation does not seem to be beneficial for reducing urinary incontinence in older adults. In older females and males, a large clinical trial shows that vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily for 5 years does not reduce the incidence or progression of urinary incontinence when compared with placebo (109738,109741). In older males with low vitamin D status, vitamin D supplementation may actually increase some types of incontinence (109738).
Urinary tract infections (UTIs). It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention of UTIs in children. Details: A meta-analysis of 13 small observational studies in children suggests that lower levels of vitamin D are associated with 2.8-fold greater odds of UTI when compared with higher vitamin D levels. Further, this analysis shows that vitamin D deficiency in children is linked to 5.5-fold greater odds of UTI when compared with normal vitamin D levels (112030).
Urticaria. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of urticaria. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that having urticaria is associated with a slightly lower vitamin D blood level and a greater likelihood of vitamin D deficiency when compared with individuals without urticaria. In addition, a meta-analysis of 6 clinical trials shows that taking vitamin D at an average daily dose of at least 4100 IU has a modest effect on the severity of urticaria symptoms (106115). Pooled data from 2 clinical studies in adults with chronic urticaria shows that taking vitamin D for 12 weeks, either as cholecalciferol 60,000 IU every 2 weeks or as alfacalcidol, 0.25 mcg once daily, reduces pruritus severity when compared with placebo (115587).
Uterine fibroids. Low vitamin D status is associated with uterine fibroids and some clinical research suggests that taking vitamin D may modestly decrease the size of uterine fibroids. Details: Two meta-analyses of 5 clinical studies in premenopausal adults with uterine fibroids shows that taking vitamin D, either 50,000 IU weekly or biweekly for 8-12 weeks or 1000 IU daily for 1 year, decreases fibroid size when compared with placebo or no treatment (113577,115573). One of the meta-analyses found a 5.7% difference in fibroid size between vitamin D and control (115573). Observational research also suggests that vitamin D status is associated with uterine fibroids. Specifically, meta-analyses of a total 23 observational studies suggest that individuals with uterine fibroids have lower serum vitamin D levels and a 3.7-times higher odds of vitamin D deficiency (115573).
Vaginal atrophy. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial for vaginal atrophy. There is limited evidence on the topical use of vitamin D in vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal adults or patients taking tamoxifen. Details: A small cross-sectional study in postmenopausal adults has found that taking a vitamin D supplement for at least one year improves the maturation index of superficial vaginal wall cells when compared with those who do not take vitamin D. However, symptoms of vaginal atrophy were not different between groups (16879). Vitamin D has also been evaluated for vaginal atrophy due to tamoxifen. A small clinical trial in females with breast cancer using tamoxifen shows that receiving vitamin D 1000 IU vaginal suppositories daily for 8 weeks improves maturation index of vaginal walls and self-reported symptoms when compared with placebo (99773).
Vertigo. It is unclear if oral vitamin D is beneficial in patients with vertigo. Details: An analysis of observational research suggests that lower serum levels of vitamin D are associated with a higher risk of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) when compared with higher vitamin D levels (114579). However, it is unclear if vitamin D supplementation can reduce the risk of BPPV in individuals with low vitamin D levels. Vitamin D has been evaluated in combination with other ingredients for the treatment of BPPV. A large clinical study in adults with recurrent BPPV shows that taking vitamin D 400 IU and calcium 500 mg twice daily for one year reduces the risk of recurrence by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 4 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination.
Vitiligo. Although there is interest in using oral vitamin D for vitiligo, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin D for this condition.
Warts. Although there is interest in using topical vitamin D derivatives for warts, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of vitamin D for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate vitamin D for these uses.

Constipation. A specific yogurt (Activia) seems to be beneficial for increasing bowel movements. Details: Clinical research in females with functional constipation shows that eating a specific probiotic yogurt (Activia) 125 grams twice daily for 2 weeks increases bowel movements by about 1 additional bowel movement per week and reduces straining effort and pain during stool evacuation when compared with eating a milky dessert (95583).
Hyperlipidemia. Certain types of oral yogurt seem to modestly reduce cholesterol levels. Details: Taking yogurt orally seems to decrease cholesterol levels in patients with borderline to moderate hyperlipidemia (1240,1241,3590,95579). In one crossover study, four weeks of treatment with a yogurt containing a human strain of L. acidophilus, as 200 mL daily for 3-4 weeks, reduced total cholesterol levels by 3% when compared with baseline (1240). In a small crossover study in males, taking a milk preparation fermented with L. acidophilus plus added fructo-oligosaccharides 2.5% as 125 mL three times daily for 3 weeks reduced total cholesterol by 4.4%, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 5.4%, and the LDL/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio by 5.3%. There were no significant changes in triglyceride or HDL levels (1241). In a larger study, borderline hyperlipidemic adults taking a specific yogurt fermented with a strain of Enterococcus faecium and two strains of Streptococcus thermophilus (CAUSIDO culture) as 450 mL daily for 8 weeks had an average LDL reduction of 8% after adjusting for changes in body mass. However, yogurts fermented with a Streptococcus thermophilus/L. acidophilus combination and a Streptococcus thermophilus/L. rhamnosus combination did not reduce LDL cholesterol levels (3590).
Lactose intolerance. Oral yogurt with live bacterial cultures seems to increase lactose tolerance in children and adults. Details: Continuous consumption of yogurt with live bacterial cultures 500 grams daily for 15 days seems to improve lactose tolerance in children and adults with lactose malabsorption. The presence of actively growing bacteria cultures or the fat content does not seem to influence tolerability (1246,1256,8526,8943,9220).

Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Some research suggests that oral yogurt containing certain probiotics is beneficial for antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD). However, not all research agrees. Details: There is some clinical evidence that consuming yogurt fermented with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, with or without Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis and Lactobacillus acidophilus, 125 mL twice daily for 7 days during antibiotic treatment, can decrease symptoms of diarrhea, abdominal distress, stomach pain, and flatulence in adults and children taking broad spectrum antibiotics such as erythromycin (1255,3589,95585). However, other types of yogurt products do not seem to offer the same benefits. Some preliminary clinical studies show that eating 75-150 mL of yogurt fermented with probiotics daily does not reduce the risk of AAD in adults and children (95367,95582,98503). Also, a small clinical trial in adults in the intensive care unit receiving antibiotics shows that consuming a specific yogurt drink containing Lacticaseibacillus casei (Danactive, Danone) orally or via a feeding tube does not reduce the incidence of AAD when compared with a control group (98504). However, this study was not adequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
Aspirin-associated gastric damage. It is unclear if oral yogurt can reduce the risk of aspirin-associated gastric damage. Details: A small clinical study in adults taking aspirin 81 mg daily for at least 1 month shows that consuming 112 mL of yogurt containing Lactobacillus gasseri OLL2716 112 mL twice daily for 6 weeks reduces the number of mucosal breaks and the number of reddened lesions of the small bowel when compared with placebo (95592).
Asthma. It is unclear if oral yogurt can improve lung function in people with asthma. Details: A small clinical crossover study in patients with moderate asthma shows that consuming 225 grams of live active yogurt twice daily for 1 month does not affect measures of lung function when compared with a control phase (1244).
Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral yogurt can improve athletic performance. Details: A very small crossover trial in adolescent female athletes shows that consuming Greek yogurt 160 grams 3 times daily during a 5-day soccer training camp does not improve measures of speed, agility, endurance, or lower body strength when compared with an isocaloric carbohydrate control (110568).
Bacterial vaginosis. It is unclear if oral or intravaginal yogurt is beneficial for bacterial vaginosis treatment or prevention. Details: A small clinical trial in adults with bacterial vaginosis shows that consuming a yogurt drink containing Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactobacillus jensenii, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus 125 grams twice daily for 4 weeks, in conjunction with metronidazole twice daily for 7 days, increases the cure rate for bacterial vaginosis by an additional 35% when compared with those consuming acidified milk with metronidazole. The probiotic yogurt drink also improved symptoms of discharge and odor (98503).
Cancer. It is unclear if eating yogurt prevents cancer or reduces mortality from cancer; the available research is conflicting. Details: Some population research has found that eating yogurt is associated with 13% lower odds of cancer when compared with not eating yogurt (101752). Specifically, yogurt consumption is associated with a 17% lower odds of bladder cancer, a 32% lower odds of colorectal cancer, and a 19% lower odds of lung cancer (101752,105176). Also in other population research, eating yogurt at least once weekly is associated with a 47% to 54% lower odds of cancer-related mortality when compared with not eating yogurt. This was possibly related specifically to colon, pancreatic, and lung cancers (107653). However, other population research has found that while eating yogurt more than four times weekly is associated with a 13% lower risk of mortality from cancer in females when compared with not eating yogurt, this association was not found in males (105173). Also, some population research has found that eating yogurt is not associated with lower odds of cancer, including colorectal cancer, in adults (105172,105177,105178,107663).
Cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear if eating yogurt prevents CVD or mortality from CVD. Details: Most observational research has found that higher consumption of yogurt is not associated with a reduced risk of CVD or CVD-related mortality in healthy adults (95593,105173,105177,107653,107663). However, some observational research has found that the highest intake of yogurt is associated with a 16% reduction in CVD-related mortality when compared with the lowest intake (105178).
Clostridioides difficile infection. It is unclear if oral yogurt is beneficial for preventing C. difficile infection. Details: A small clinical trial in adults in the intensive care unit receiving antibiotics shows that consuming a specific yogurt drink containing Lacticaseibacillus casei (Danactive, Danone) orally or via a feeding tube does not reduce the incidence of C. difficile infection when compared with a control group. However, this study was not adequately powered to detect a difference in outcomes (98504).
Colorectal adenoma. It is unclear if eating yogurt is beneficial for preventing colorectal adenomas. Details: Observational research has found that daily yogurt intake is associated with 46% reduced odds of hyperplastic polyps when compared with rare or no yogurt intake (105172). Other observational research has found that weekly yogurt intake is associated with 27% reduced odds of adenomatous polyps, but not other polyp types, when compared with rare or no yogurt intake in females, but not in males. However, other observational research in an at-risk population has not found an association between yogurt intake and risk of colorectal polyps (105172).
Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if eating yogurt is beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer. Details: A meta-analysis of population research has found that eating the highest amount of yogurt is associated with a 13% lower risk of colorectal cancer, especially colon cancer, when compared with eating the lowest amount (107662). However, findings from individual population studies are mixed (101752,105172,107662,110564).
Dental caries. It is unclear if eating yogurt is beneficial for preventing dental caries. Details: Population research in children aged 2-17 years has found that eating at least 123 grams of yogurt daily is associated with a 34% lower odds of dental caries when compared with not eating yogurt. However, sub-analyses found that a beneficial association was limited to children aged 6 years and up (107654).
Dental plaque. It is unclear if oral yogurt is beneficial for dental plaque. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming yogurt supplemented with Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (Activia Sade, Danone) 110 grams daily for 4 weeks does not prevent plaque build-up when compared with a placebo yogurt. However, after a 5-day non-brushing plaque accumulation phase, plaque was reduced by approximately 56% in the probiotic group when compared with placebo (98502).
Diabetes. It is unclear if eating yogurt is beneficial for the prevention of type 2 diabetes. It is also unclear if yogurt is beneficial for glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes or gestational diabetes. Details: Meta-analyses of observational research have found that eating yogurt 80-244 grams daily is associated with a 14% to 18% reduced risk of type 2 diabetes when compared with not eating yogurt (101772,101773). Another meta-analysis of 14 observational studies has found that each 50-gram increase in daily yogurt consumption is associated with a 7% lower risk of type 2 diabetes (110566). Other observational research in patients with prediabetes has found that increasing intake of low-fat yogurt is associated with a 45% lower odds of developing type 2 diabetes (107658). However, decreasing total yogurt intake was not associated with an increased risk of developing diabetes, and reducing intake of high-fat yogurt was not associated with the risk of developing diabetes unless there was also an increase in the intake of low-fat yogurt. This suggests that any potential benefit may be related to decreasing fat intake rather than increasing yogurt intake (107658). Also, most individuals in these studies were White. In a population of Black females, eating yogurt at least once daily was not associated with a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes when compared with eating yogurt less than once monthly (105175). Yogurt has also been evaluated for glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Although results from individual studies are conflicting, a meta-analysis of six clinical trials shows that eating yogurt with probiotics for 6-12 weeks is no more effective than yogurt or a dairy product without probiotics for improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (101749). Some clinical research suggests that yogurt fortified with vitamin D, instead of probiotics, may be beneficial. One clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking a vitamin D3 500 IU-fortified yogurt drink 250 mL twice daily for 12-16 weeks improves levels of fasting blood glucose by 13 mg/dL and tends to reduce levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) when compared with baseline. The yogurt drink without vitamin D did not improve glycemic control (101774). Clinical research in adults with gestational diabetes shows that taking a vitamin D3 500 IU-fortified yogurt drink 100 grams twice daily for 16 weeks modestly reduces fasting blood glucose and improves insulin levels and insulin resistance when compared to baseline. Consuming the yogurt without vitamin D did not improve glycemic control (101775).
Diarrhea. It is unclear if oral yogurt is beneficial for acute or persistent diarrhea. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that yogurt formula given as a replacement for milk formula in infants and young children seems to relieve persistent diarrhea. A yogurt made from infant formula fermented with Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus, given daily for 5 days, has been used in children aged 3-36 months (1250,1254). Research regarding the effects of yogurt on acute diarrhea is conflicting. Some preliminary clinical research shows that giving probiotic yogurt to children aged 6 months to 12 years with acute diarrhea can reduce the duration of hospitalization and the frequency of diarrhea and can increase the percentage of children who recover by the third day (93702,93708). These studies have used yogurt 15 mL/kg daily in breast-feeding children aged 6-24 months (93708) and yogurt containing L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus thermophilus, 100 mL daily for 5 days (93702). However, a pooled analysis of results from four clinical trials shows that yogurt does not reduce total stool volume, the duration of diarrhea, or the risk of treatment failure in children aged 3-48 months with acute diarrhea (93709). Additionally, a large clinical trial shows that giving children aged 1-5 years with acute diarrhea yogurt 15 grams/kg daily for 3 days does not reduce the frequency of diarrhea when compared with Lactobacillus rhamnosus-containing probiotics (110565).
Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral yogurt can prevent exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A very small crossover trial in adolescent female athletes shows that consuming Greek yogurt 160 grams 3 times daily during a 5-day soccer training camp does not reduce muscle damage, as measured by creatine kinase plasma levels, when compared with an isocaloric carbohydrate control (110568).
Gingivitis. It is unclear if oral yogurt is beneficial for gingivitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming yogurt supplemented with Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (Activia Sade, Danone) 110 grams daily for 4 weeks does not prevent gingivitis when compared with placebo yogurt. However, after a 5-day non-brushing plaque accumulation phase, symptoms of gingivitis were reduced by approximately 47% in the probiotic group when compared with placebo (98502).
Helicobacter pylori. It is unclear if oral yogurt is beneficial for H. pylori eradication. Details: One study shows that taking yogurt containing probiotics (AB-Yogurt) as 200 mL twice daily 30 minutes after taking H. pylori triple therapy for one week, and then twice daily for an additional 4 weeks, improves the eradication rate when compared with triple therapy alone. In this study, the yogurt also restored bifidobacteria in stools after depletion by triple therapy and increased treatment adherence (8525). However, another study shows that taking yogurt containing probiotics (Will yogurt, Korea Yakult) does not improve the eradication rate in patients using triple therapy (93712). Also, consuming yogurt without standard triple therapy does not appear to effectively eradicate H. pylori (10053).
Hepatic encephalopathy. It is unclear if oral yogurt is beneficial for hepatic encephalopathy. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that eating 12 ounces of probiotic yogurt daily for 60 days can reverse mild cognitive deficits associated with minimal hepatic encephalopathy when compared with not eating yogurt (95581).
HIV/AIDS. It is unclear if oral yogurt is beneficial for HIV/AIDS; the benefits seem to depend on the strain of bacteria found in the probiotic product. Details: One preliminary clinical study conducted in a small group of antiretroviral-naïve females with HIV/AIDS shows that consuming yogurt enriched in Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Limosilactobacillus reuteri RC-14 100 mL daily for 15 days reduces gastrointestinal symptoms and increases CD4 counts when compared with consuming yogurt without additional probiotics (93714). Another preliminary clinical study shows that consuming yogurt enriched in L. rhamnosus fiti 200 mL daily for 3 years increases CD4 counts in patients with HIV/AIDS by approximately 64 cells/mcL/year when compared to baseline (93704). However, not all research shows beneficial effects. Other clinical research in antiretroviral-naïve HIV patients shows that taking a micronutrient-enriched yogurt with or without L. rhamnosus GR-1 daily for 4 weeks does not improve CD4 counts (93703,95586). Reasons for the discrepancies are not clear but may include differences in the yogurt used, the duration of treatment, and the immune status of the patients at baseline.
Hypertension. It is unclear if eating yogurt helps to reduce blood pressure or prevent hypertension. Details: Population research in patients with hypertension has found that increased intake of yogurt is associated with a reduction in systolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure, but not diastolic blood pressure. Yogurt intake was not associated with cholesterol, triglyceride, or glucose levels. Additionally, in individuals without hypertension, there was no association between yogurt intake and blood pressure (107660). A meta-analysis of 11 observational studies in adults without hypertension has found that increasing intake of yogurt is not associated with a lower risk of developing hypertension (110566).
Malnourishment-related diarrhea. Oral yogurt does not seem to be beneficial for diarrhea related to malnourishment. Details: Clinical research in malnourished males aged 4-47 months shows that consuming 120 mL/kg of yogurt formula daily, separated into 7 divided doses, does not reduce the rate of acute diarrhea when compared with consuming milk formula in the same volume (1242).
Menopausal symptoms. It is unclear if oral yogurt is beneficial for reducing menopausal symptoms. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a specific yogurt rich in prebiotics (inulin 1.5%; FrutafitTEX!, Sensus Company) 100 grams daily for 6 weeks modestly reduces menopausal symptoms, including anxiety, depression, and vasomotor symptoms, as well as low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, when compared to a control yogurt. There was no effect on other lipids or fasting glucose levels, or on somatic or sexual symptoms. Although the duration of hot flashes was modestly reduced, there was no effect on hot flash frequency (107659).
Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if eating yogurt reduces the risk of metabolic syndrome. Details: An observational study has found that consuming 46 grams of whole-fat yogurt daily is associated with a 22% reduced risk of metabolic syndrome when compared with not consuming yogurt. The study also found that consuming 124 grams of low-fat yogurt daily is associated with a 27% reduced risk of metabolic syndrome when compared with consuming very little or no yogurt (95580).
Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral yogurt is beneficial for increasing muscle strength. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that consuming yogurt to increase dietary calcium and vitamin D intakes does not improve muscle strength or lean body mass when compared with a control diet in females participating in resistance training (93713).
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral yogurt is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients newly diagnosed with NAFLD shows that consuming yogurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis 300 grams daily for 8 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and body weight, but not blood glucose or triglyceride levels, when compared with yogurt without probiotics (95589). Conversely, other clinical research shows that taking probiotic yogurt 100 grams fortified with vitamin D 1000 IU daily for 3 months does not improve fasting blood glucose levels, insulin levels, blood pressure, or anthropometric indices when compared with unfortified yogurt in patients with NAFLD. The probiotic yogurt with vitamin D provided L. acidophilus La-5 and B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 about 40 million colony-forming units (105174).
Obesity. It is unclear if eating yogurt reduces the risk of obesity in adults or children; the available research is limited and conflicting. Details: Several observational studies have found that eating yogurt is associated with a reduced risk of obesity in both children and adults. A large study found that children who eat yogurt tend to have lower fat intake, body mass index (BMI), and body fat percentage when compared with children who do not eat yogurt (101776). In children with a family history of obesity, observational research has found that eating one serving of yogurt daily is associated with improvements in insulin resistance; however, it is not associated with improved weight or body composition (101777). In adults, a meta-analysis of 5 observational studies has found that each 50-gram increase in daily yogurt consumption is associated with a 13% lower risk of developing obesity (110556). However, the validity of these findings is limited by the high heterogeneity of the studies included. One observational study in adults has found that eating more than seven servings of yogurt weekly, especially full-fat yogurt, is associated with a 20% reduced incidence of overweight or obesity when compared with eating two servings or less weekly (101778). In addition, observational research in Korean adults has found that eating at least one serving of yogurt is associated with a 23% reduced prevalence of obesity when compared with not eating yogurt (101779). In contrast to the majority of these findings, one observational study in patients at high cardiovascular risk found that a higher intake of yogurt is not associated with improvement in abdominal obesity (95591).
Overall mortality. It is unclear if eating yogurt reduces the risk of mortality. Details: Observational research has found that eating yogurt is associated with a reduced risk of overall mortality. Some population research has found that eating yogurt at least once weekly is associated with a 30% to 38% lower odds of overall mortality when compared with not eating yogurt (107653). Other observational research has found that eating yogurt is associated with 17% lower odds of overall mortality when compared with not eating yogurt (107663).
Physical performance. It is unclear if oral yogurt is beneficial for improving physical performance in older adults. Details: A small clinical trial in healthy untrained older males shows that consuming Icelandic yogurt 200 grams after exercise three times weekly for 8 weeks increases lean body mass by 0.7 kg when compared with consuming an isoenergetic placebo. There were also modest benefits in strength based on bench press and leg press performance (107655). However, another small clinical study in healthy adults aged 60-83 years who had undergone at least 12 months of interval walking training shows that consuming a non-fat yogurt drink after each interval walking training session for 8 weeks does not improve total walking days, walking time, energy expenditure, exercise intensity, or heart rate when compared with a carbohydrate control (110567).
Quality of life. It is unclear if oral yogurt is beneficial for improving quality of life. Details: Clinical research in female healthcare workers shows that consuming 112 mL daily of a specific yogurt (Meiji Probio Yogurt R-1; Meiji Co., Ltd.) fermented with and containing at least 1.12 billion colony-forming units of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus OLL1073R-1 and Streptococcus thermophilus daily for 6 weeks modestly improves some measures of quality of life, such as sleep quality and vitality, when compared with not eating yogurt. However, there was no effect on physical, social, or emotional functioning, or overall mental health (107657).
Respiratory tract infections. Although there has been interest in using oral yogurt for preventing respiratory tract infections, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of yogurt for this purpose.
Urinary tract infections (UTIs). It is unclear if oral yogurt is beneficial for UTI prevention. Details: Preliminary research in females with a history of UTIs suggests that consuming a yogurt drink containing Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus for up to 6 months does not prevent recurrent UTIs (8253).
Vaginal candidiasis. Intravaginal yogurt has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its benefits when used alone are unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that intravaginal application of a mixture of yogurt and honey 5 grams daily for 7 days reduces symptoms of vaginal candidiasis such as itching, irritation, dysuria, discharge, and dyspareunia to a similar or greater extent than clotrimazole vaginal cream. Applying the yogurt and honey mixture also appears to induce recovery of vaginal candidiasis in a similar number of patients as using clotrimazole cream (93498). More evidence is needed to rate yogurt for these uses.

Safety view details

Below is general information about the safety of the known ingredients contained in the product Fat Free Yogurt (Strawberry flavor). Some ingredients may not be listed. This information does NOT represent a recommendation for or a test of this specific product as a whole.

BEET

LIKELY SAFE ...when used in amounts commonly found in foods.

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately for medicinal purposes, short term. Beetroot juice has been safely used in clinical trials in doses of up to 500 mL daily for up to 7 days and a beetroot-based nutritional gel has been used safely in doses of up to 100 grams daily for 8 days (94461,94462,94464,100149,100152,100153).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of beets used medicinally during pregnancy and breast-feeding.

BIFIDOBACTERIUM ANIMALIS SUBSP. LACTIS (Bifidus)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Bifidobacterium lactis has been safely used alone or in combination with other probiotics in clinical trials lasting up to 12 weeks (92255,98502,105158,107572,107581,107586,110979,110985,110986,110992)(110993,110998,110999).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in children of most ages. Bifidobacterium lactis has been safely used alone or in combination with other probiotics in infants and children for up to 15 months (3169,3458,92265,95381,95382,98736,105149,107582,107583,107585)(107587,107590,110984,110987,110988,110991,110994,110995). A combination probiotic containing B. lactis and Lactobacillus acidophilus (HOWARU Protect, Danisco) has been used safely for up to 6 months in children aged 3-5 years (16847). A specific combination of B. lactis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and L. acidophilus (Complete Probiotic Platinum) has also been used safely for up to 18 months in children aged 4 months to 5 years (103436). In addition, in children ages 4-17 years, 1 billion CFUs of a 1:1:1 combination of B. lactis CECT 8145, Lacticasebacillus casei CECT 9104, and Bifidobacterium longum CECT 7347 has been used safely for 12 weeks (107531). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of B. lactis in preterm infants with a birth weight under 1000 grams. Cases of bacteremia have occurred rarely in preterm infants given other probiotics (102416,111610,111612,111613,111850,111852,111853). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning about cases of serious infections caused by probiotics reported in very preterm or very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams (111610). Similarly, the American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to these infants due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy (111608).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available. A meta-analysis of four clinical trials shows that taking probiotics during pregnancy increases the relative risk of pre-eclampsia by 85% when compared with placebo. Although the specific effects of Bifidobacterium lactis are unclear from this analysis, three of the included studies used B. lactis in combination with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (105185). More information is needed to determine if certain patients are at increased risk.

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Lacticaseibacillus casei has been safely used alone or in combination with other ingredients in studies lasting up to 8 weeks (90230,112517).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in children of most ages. Lacticaseibacillus casei has been safely used alone in studies lasting up to 4 months (14373,107544). Also, a specific mixture (Latopic, Biomed S.A.) providing 1 billion CFUs of L. casei ŁOCK 0919 50%, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus ŁOCK 0900 25%, and L. rhamnosus ŁOCK 0908 25% has been used with apparent safety for 3 months in children under 2 years of age (107510). In addition, in children ages 4-17 years, a 1:1:1 combination of L. casei CECT 9104, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis CECT 8145, and Bifidobacterium longum CECT 7347 providing 1 billion CFUs has been used with apparent safety for 12 weeks (107531). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of L. casei in preterm infants with a birth weight under 1000 grams. Cases of bacteremia have occurred rarely in preterm infants given other probiotics (102416,111610,111612,111613,111850,111852,111853). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning about cases of serious infections caused by probiotics reported in very preterm or very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams (111610). Similarly, the American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to these infants due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy (111608).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. A combination of Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium bifidum has been used with apparent safety for 6 weeks, starting at 24-28 weeks' gestation (95416,98430).

LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of Lacticaseibacillus casei during lactation. However, there are currently no reasons to expect safety concerns when used appropriately.

LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS (L. Bulgaricus, L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Lactobacillus acidophilus has been safely used as part of multi-ingredient probiotic products in studies lasting up to nine months (1731,6087,14370,14371,90231,90296,92255,103438,12775,107581)(110950,110970,110979,110998,111785,111793). ...when used intravaginally and appropriately. L. acidophilus has been used safely in studies lasting up to 12 weeks (12108,13176,13177,90265). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of non-viable, heat-killed L. acidophilus formulations when used orally.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in children of most ages. Lactobacillus acidophilus has been safely used for up to 5 days (96887). Also, combination probiotics containing L. acidophilus have been used with apparent safety in various doses and durations. L. acidophilus has been combined with Bifidobacterium animalis (HOWARU Protect, Danisco) for up to 6 months in children 3-5 years old (16847), with Bifidobacterium bifidum for 6 weeks (90602,96890), with Bifidobacterium bifidum and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (Complete Probiotic Platinum) for 18 months in children 4 months to 5 years of age (103436), and in a specific product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) containing a total of 8 species for 3 months in children 2-12 years old (107497). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of L. acidophilus in preterm infants with a birth weight under 1000 grams. Cases of bacteremia have occurred rarely in preterm infants given other probiotics (102416,111610,111612,111613,111850,111852,111853). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning about cases of serious infections caused by probiotics reported in very preterm or very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams (111610). Similarly, the American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to these infants due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy (111608).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. A combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum has been used with apparent safety for 6 weeks, starting at 24-28 weeks' gestation (95416,98430).

LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of Lactobacillus acidophilus during lactation. However, there are currently no reasons to expect safety concerns when used appropriately.

PECTIN

LIKELY SAFE ...when used in amounts commonly found in foods. Pectin has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts greater than those typically found in food. Pectin 4.8 grams three times daily has been used for up to one year without serious adverse effects (12547,15019,15020,92481,108525).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally in amounts greater than those found in food, short-term. Pectin 4 grams/kg has been used daily for up to 7 days without reports of serious adverse effects (12575,19705).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used in amounts commonly found in foods. Pectin has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally in medicinal amounts (12577).

VITAMIN D

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intramuscularly and appropriately. Vitamin D has been safely used in a wide range of doses (7555,16888,16891,17476,95913,98186,104619,105209,109040,109059)(115580,115590). When used orally long-term, doses should not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily for adults (17506,99773); however, much higher doses such as 50,000 IU (1250 mcg) weekly orally for 6-12 weeks are often needed for the short-term treatment of vitamin D deficiency (16891,17476,115590). Monthly oral doses of up to 60,000 IU (1500 mcg) have also been safely used for up to 5 years (105726). Toxicity usually does not occur until plasma levels exceed 150 ng/mL (17476).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses, long-term. Taking doses greater than the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily for adults for long periods can increase the risk of hypercalcemia (17506); however, much higher doses are often needed for short-term treatment of vitamin D deficiency. Toxicity typically occurs when levels exceed 150 ng/mL (17476).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. When used long-term, doses should not exceed the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 1000 IU (25 mcg) daily for those 0-6 months of age, 1500 IU (37.5 mcg) daily for those 6-12 months of age, 2500 IU (62.5 mcg) daily for those 1-3 years of age, 3000 IU (75 mcg) daily for those 4-8 years of age, and 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily for those 9 years and older (17506); however, much higher doses are often needed for the short-term treatment of vitamin D deficiency. Some research shows that giving vitamin D 14,000 IU (350 mcg) weekly for a year in children aged 10-17 years is safe (16875). A meta-analysis of clinical studies shows that 1000 IU (25 mcg) daily in those up to a year of age and greater than 2000 IU (50 mcg) daily in those aged 1-6 years does not increase the risk of serious adverse events (108424).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses for longer than one year. Taking doses greater than the tolerable upper intake level (UL) long-term can increase the risk of hypercalcemia (17506).

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Vitamin D is safe when used in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily (17506,95910).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive amounts. Tell patients not to use doses above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily. Hypercalcemia during pregnancy due to excessive vitamin D intake can lead to several fetal adverse effects, including suppression of parathyroid hormone, hypocalcemia, tetany, seizures, aortic valve stenosis, retinopathy, and mental and/or physical developmental delay (17506).

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Vitamin D is safe when used in doses below the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily (17506).

LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive amounts. Tell patients not to use doses above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily (17506).

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately (1240,1241,1242,1245,1246,1253,1256,3590,8526,93499)(95367,93712,95588,95589,110567).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used intravaginally and appropriately (1248).

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when consumed in amounts commonly found in foods.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used intravaginally. A small clinical study in pregnancy reported no adverse reactions (1248).

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used in amounts commonly found in foods. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of the intravaginal use of yogurt during breast-feeding.

Interactions with Drugs view details

Below is general information about the interactions of the known ingredients contained in the product Fat Free Yogurt (Strawberry flavor). Some ingredients may not be listed. This information does NOT represent a recommendation for or a test of this specific product as a whole.

BEET

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) SUBSTRATES

Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination.

Severity = Mild • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, beet might decrease the levels and clinical effects of CYP1A2 substrates.

Details

In vitro research suggests that beet induces CYP1A2 enzymes (111404).

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, beet might increase the levels of CYP3A4 substrates.

Details

In vitro research suggests that betanin, the major pigment in beet, competitively inhibits CYP3A4 in a dose-dependent manner similarly to strong CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole (113425).

BIFIDOBACTERIUM ANIMALIS SUBSP. LACTIS (Bifidus)

ANTIBIOTIC DRUGS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, taking Bifidobacterium lactis with antibiotic drugs might decrease the effectiveness of B. lactis.

Details

Since B. lactis preparations usually contain live and active organisms, simultaneously taking antibiotics might kill a significant number of the organisms (1740,22802). Tell patients to separate administration of antibiotics and B. lactis preparations by at least 2 hours.

LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS (L. Bulgaricus, L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus)

ANTIBIOTIC DRUGS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Mild • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, taking Lacticaseibacillus casei with antibiotic drugs might decrease the effectiveness of L. casei.

Details

L. casei preparations usually contain live and active organisms. Therefore, simultaneously taking antibiotics might kill a significant number of the organisms (1740). Tell patients to separate administration of antibiotics and L. casei preparations by at least two hours.

ANTIBIOTIC DRUGS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Mild • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, taking Lactobacillus acidophilus with antibiotic drugs might decrease the effectiveness of L. acidophilus.

Details

L. acidophilus preparations usually contain live and active organisms. Therefore, simultaneously taking antibiotics might kill a significant number of the organisms (1740). Tell patients to separate administration of antibiotics and L. acidophilus preparations by at least two hours.

PECTIN

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = B

Theoretically, pectin might reduce the absorption of digoxin, potentially decreasing its effectiveness.

Details

A small clinical study shows that taking digoxin with a kaolin-pectin suspension reduces the absorption of digoxin by about 62% (2212). It is unclear if these effects are due to pectin, kaolin, or the combination.

LOVASTATIN (Mevacor)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, pectin might reduce the absorption of lovastatin, potentially decreasing its effectiveness.

Details

Case reports suggest that concomitant use of pectin and lovastatin might reduce the cholesterol-lowering effect of lovastatin, possibly due to reduced intestinal absorption of lovastatin (615).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = B

Theoretically, pectin might reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics, potentially decreasing their effectiveness.

Details

A small clinical study shows that taking tetracycline with bismuth subsalicylate in a kaolin-pectin suspension reduces the absorption of tetracycline by about 34% (2213). It is unclear if these effects are due to pectin, kaolin, bismuth subsalicylate, or the combination.

(Read more about STRAWBERRY)

STRAWBERRY

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

In vitro and animal research suggests that strawberry extract can inhibit platelet aggregation due to its phenolic content (76472,76488). Theoretically, strawberry might increase the risk of bleeding when used with antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs.

Details

Some anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs include aspirin, clopidogrel (Plavix), dalteparin (Fragmin), enoxaparin (Lovenox), heparin, ticlopidine (Ticlid), warfarin (Coumadin), and others.

P-GLYCOPROTEIN SUBSTRATES

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

In vitro research suggests that strawberry extract can inhibit p-glycoprotein efflux (76474,76476). Theoretically, strawberry might inhibit p-glycoprotein mediated drug efflux and potentially increase levels of drugs that are substrates of p-glycoprotein. Until more is known, strawberry should be used cautiously in people taking p-glycoprotein substrates.

Details

Drugs that might be affected include some chemotherapeutic agents (etoposide, paclitaxel, vinblastine, vincristine, vindesine), antifungals (ketoconazole, itraconazole), protease inhibitors (amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, saquinavir), H2 antagonists (cimetidine, ranitidine), some calcium channel blockers (diltiazem, verapamil), corticosteroids, erythromycin, cisapride (Propulsid), fexofenadine (Allegra), cyclosporine, loperamide (Imodium), quinidine, and others.

VITAMIN D

ALUMINUM

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Mild • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = B

Vitamin D might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity, but this has only been reported in people with renal failure.

Details

The protein that transports calcium across the intestinal wall can also bind and transport aluminum. This protein is stimulated by vitamin D, which may therefore increase aluminum absorption (11595,11597,22916). This mechanism may contribute to increased aluminum levels and toxicity in people with renal failure, when they take vitamin D and aluminum-containing phosphate binders chronically (11529,11596,11597).

ATORVASTATIN (Lipitor)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Mild • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = B

Vitamin D might reduce absorption of atorvastatin.

Details

A small, low-quality clinical study shows that taking vitamin D reduces levels of atorvastatin and its active metabolites by up to 55%. However, while atorvastatin levels decreased, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels did not substantially change (16828). Atorvastatin is metabolized in the gut by CYP3A4 enzymes, and researchers theorized that vitamin D might induce CYP3A4, causing reduced levels of atorvastatin. However, this proposed mechanism was not specifically studied.

CALCIPOTRIENE (Dovonex)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = D

Taking calcipotriene with vitamin D increases the risk for hypercalcemia.

Details

Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (15). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with vitamin D supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES

Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination.

Severity = Mild • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Vitamin D might induce CYP3A4 enzymes and reduce the bioavailability of CYP3A4 substrates.

Details

There is some concern that vitamin D might induce CYP3A4. In vitro research suggests that vitamin D induces CYP3A4 transcription. Additionally, observational research has found that increased UV light exposure and serum vitamin D levels are associated with decreased serum levels of CYP3A4 substrates such as tacrolimus and sirolimus, while no association between UV light exposure or vitamin D levels and levels of mycophenolic acid, a non-CYP3A4 substrate, was found (110539). A small, low-quality clinical study shows that taking vitamin D reduces levels of the CYP3A4 substrate atorvastatin and its active metabolites by up to 55%; however, the clinical effects of atorvastatin were not reduced (16828). While researchers theorized that vitamin D might induce CYP3A4, this proposed mechanism was not specifically studied.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = High • Occurrence = Possible • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, hypercalcemia induced by high-dose vitamin D can increase the risk of arrhythmia from digoxin.

Details

High doses of vitamin D can cause hypercalcemia. Hypercalcemia increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with digoxin (15). Avoid vitamin D doses above the tolerable upper intake level (4000 IU daily for adults) and monitor serum calcium levels in people taking vitamin D and digoxin concurrently.

DILTIAZEM (Cardizem, others)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = B

Theoretically, hypercalcemia induced by high-dose vitamin D can reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem for arrhythmia.

Details

High doses of vitamin D can cause hypercalcemia. Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically this could also occur with diltiazem. Avoid vitamin D doses above the tolerable upper intake level (4000 IU daily for adults) and monitor serum calcium levels in people taking vitamin D and diltiazem concurrently.

THIAZIDE DIURETICS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = D

Theoretically, taking thiazide diuretics and high-dose vitamin D can increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

Details

Thiazide diuretics decrease urinary calcium excretion, which could lead to hypercalcemia if vitamin D supplements are taken concurrently (3072,11541,69580). This has been reported in people being treated with vitamin D for hypoparathyroidism, and also in elderly people with normal parathyroid function who were taking a thiazide, vitamin D, and calcium-containing antacids daily (11539,11540).

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = B

Hypercalcemia induced by high-dose vitamin D can reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil for arrhythmia.

Details

Hypercalcemia due to high doses of vitamin D can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Avoid vitamin D doses above the tolerable upper intake level (4000 IU daily for adults) and monitor serum calcium levels in people taking vitamin D and verapamil concurrently.

CIPROFLOXACIN (Cipro)

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = B

Taking yogurt with ciprofloxacin might reduce the levels and clinical effects of ciprofloxacin.

Details

A small study in humans shows that concomitant administration of yogurt and ciprofloxacin can significantly reduce absorption of ciprofloxacin (1252).

NILOTINIB (Tasigna)

Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination.

Severity = Insignificant • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = B

Yogurt might increase the absorption of nilotinib; however, it is unlikely to alter its clinical effects.

Details

Pharmacokinetic research in humans shows that taking nilotinib 400 mg dispersed in 1 teaspoon of yogurt increases absorption of nilotinib by about 31%. However, yogurt does not appear to modify the metabolism of nilotinib or increase the risk of adverse effects (93711).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS

Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination.

Severity = Moderate • Occurrence = Probable • Level of Evidence = D

Taking yogurt with tetracycline antibiotics seems to reduce the levels and clinical effects of tetracycline antibiotics.

Details

Concomitant administration with yogurt can reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics, likely due to its calcium content (15).

Report an Adverse Reaction to Fat Free Yogurt (Strawberry flavor)

Adverse Effects view details

Below is general information about the adverse effects of the known ingredients contained in the product Fat Free Yogurt (Strawberry flavor). Some ingredients may not be listed. This information does NOT represent a recommendation for or a test of this specific product as a whole.

BEET

General ...Orally, beet seems to be well tolerated when used for medicinal purposes, short term.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Red stools and red urine.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Hypocalcemia and kidney damage when ingested in large amounts.

Endocrine ...Theoretically, ingestion of large quantities of beets could lead to hypocalcemia because of the oxaluric acid content (18).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, beet juice may cause red stools (94470,97726,100142,100145,105762). This red coloring of the stools is not harmful. Additionally, beet supplementation has been reported to cause black stools. In one case, a 79-year-old male on apixaban and clopidogrel presented with black stools, nausea, and vomiting after taking beet pills 2-3 days prior. The likelihood of upper gastrointestinal bleed was determined to be low based on factors such as normal vital signs and lack of severe anemia. The patient was diagnosed with beet-induced pseudo-hematochezia which was successfully treated with fluids and discontinuation of the beet supplement (113426).
Other less common gastrointestinal side effects include loose stools, constipation, and nausea (100149).

Genitourinary ...Orally, beet is known to produce red or pink urine (beeturia) in some people (32569,34134,94464,94470,97725,97726,100142,100145,100152,105762,113422). However, this red coloring of the urine is not harmful and dissipates after about 12 hours (113422).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, vivid dreams and worsening headaches have each occurred in one person in a clinical trial, although it is not clear if this is due to beet (97723).

Renal ...Theoretically, ingestion of large quantities of beets could lead to kidney damage due to its oxaluric acid content (18).

BIFIDOBACTERIUM ANIMALIS SUBSP. LACTIS (Bifidus)

General ...Orally, Bifidobacterium lactis seems to be well tolerated by most patients.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Diarrhea.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is concern that probiotics may cause infections in some people.

Dermatologic ...In clinical research, two cases of rash, one with itching, were reported by patients taking a combination of Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei F19, and Lactobacillus acidophilus La5. However, it is not clear if these adverse effects were due to B. lactis, other probiotics, or the combination, or if the events were idiosyncratic (90236).

Gastrointestinal ...Bloating and flatulence have been reported with probiotic use; however, these adverse effects have not been reported from ingestion of Bifidobacterium lactis in particular. When taken orally, B. lactis can cause diarrhea and other gastrointestinal complaints in children (3169,95381,105149). Gastrointestinal complaints including worsening diarrhea, abdominal pain, constipation, stomach burn, and flatulence have been reported rarely (110986,110999).

Immunologic ...There have been cases of Bifidobacterium bacteremia in critically ill patients (102416,107599). These cases are rare and none seem to be due to Bifidobacterium lactis alone.
A specific preparation (NBL probiotic ATP, Nobel) containing B. lactis, Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, fructo-oligosaccharides, galacto-oligosaccharides, colostrum, and lactoferrin was found to be a significant risk factor for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus colonization in premature infants. Although there was no direct link to determine causation, it was hypothesized that the probiotic mixture helped to mediate the acquisition and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (96890).

General ...Orally, Lacticaseibacillus casei is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Mild gastrointestinal adverse effects.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is concern that lactobacilli may cause infections in some people.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, taking Lacticaseibacillus casei in combination with other probiotics may cause gastrointestinal side effects including abdominal pain (90291); however, these events are uncommon.

Immunologic ...Since Lacticaseibacillus casei preparations contain live and active microorganisms, there is some concern that they might cause pathogenic infection in some patients. Some lactobacilli species have been isolated in some cases of bacteremia, sepsis, splenic abscess, endocarditis, aortic dissection, necrotizing fasciitis, pancreatic necrosis, and meningoencephalitis. Most of these cases are thought to be due to the translocation of bacteria from other locations in the body in which they occur naturally, such as the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract. The majority of cases are not related to the use of probiotic supplements and most are not associated with the use of L. casei (107543,112516). There is at least one case of L. casei bacteremia and endocarditis thought to be related with L. casei intake in a 71-year-old immunocompromised female (112520).
There are two cases of L. casei infection in a prosthetic joint (90282,112514). In one case, the 95-year-old female with a history of hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease was known to consume yogurt containing L. casei. However, it was not confirmed that the infection was related to the consumption of this product. Spread from the gastrointestinal tract or vaginal flora could not be ruled out (90282). In the case of an 80-year-old male, the cause was unknown as there was no probiotic supplementation and no underlying medical condition or infectious portal of entry (112514).
A specific probiotic preparation (NBL probiotic ATP, Nobel) containing L. casei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, fructo-oligosaccharides, galacto-oligosaccharides, colostrum, and lactoferrin was found to be a significant risk factor for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus colonization in premature infants. Although there was no direct link to determine causation, it was hypothesized that the probiotic mixture helped to mediate the acquisition and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (96890).

LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS (L. Bulgaricus, L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus)

General ...Orally and intravaginally, Lactobacillus acidophilus is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Mild gastrointestinal adverse effects.
Intravaginally: Vaginal discharge.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is concern that L. acidophilus may cause infections in some people.

Dermatologic ...Orally, in one clinical trial, a combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei F19, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lacltis BB-12 was associated with two cases of rash, one with itching. However, it is not clear if these adverse effects were due to L. acidophilus, other ingredients, the combination, or if the events were idiosyncratic (90236).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, taking Lactobacillus acidophilus in combination with other probiotics may cause gastrointestinal side effects including epigastric discomfort (90239), abdominal pain (90239,90291,111785), dyspepsia (90239), flatulence (107497,107520), bloating (107497,111785), diarrhea (111785), vomiting (107537), and burping (90239); however, these events are uncommon.

Genitourinary ...Intravaginally, cream containing Lactobacillus acidophilus has been shown to cause increased vaginal discharge in about 5% of patients, compared to about 1% of patients receiving placebo cream (90237). Vaginal burning was reported by one person using intravaginal L. acidophilus and Limosilactobacillus fermentum in a clinical trial (111781).

Immunologic ...Since Lactobacillus acidophilus preparations contain live and active microorganisms, there is some concern that they might cause pathogenic infection in some patients. L. acidophilus has been isolated in some cases of bacteremia, sepsis, splenic abscess, liver abscess, endocarditis, necrotizing fasciitis, pancreatic necrosis, and meningoencephalitis. Most of these cases are thought to be due to the translocation of bacteria from other locations in the body in which they occur naturally, such as the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract (107543,111782,111792). L. acidophilus endophthalmitis has been reported rarely (111787,111795). In one case, it was related to intravitreal injections for age-related macular degeneration in a 90-year-old female with an intraocular lens (111787). In another, it occurred following cataract surgery (111795).

PECTIN

General ...Orally, pectin seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Diarrhea, gas, loose stools, and mild cramps.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
All routes of administration: Allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, in sensitive individuals.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, pectin alone or in combination with guar gum and insoluble fiber can cause gastrointestinal adverse effects such as mild cramps, diarrhea, gas, and loose stools (12547,15020,92473).

Immunologic ...Orally and topically, pectin may cause allergic reactions in sensitive individuals. In one case, a 7-year-old boy with a history of oral allergy syndrome after consuming a pectin-containing beverage experienced anaphylaxis after taking a citrus bath containing pectin. Allergy testing confirmed sensitivity to pectin (106928).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...The occupational inhalation of pectin dust can cause asthma (580,581,582,583,584).

(Read more about STRAWBERRY)

STRAWBERRY

General ...Orally, strawberry is well tolerated when taken in the amounts commonly found in food. When taken in medicinal amounts, strawberry seems to be generally well tolerated (100109,100113,100116,100119). Rarely, strawberry has been reported to cause nausea and allergic reactions, including oral allergy syndrome and skin reactions (100113,100119,103880).
Topically, strawberry can cause contact dermatitis (13637).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, taking freeze-dried strawberry powder 50 grams daily has been reported to cause nausea in clinical trials (100113,100119).

Immunologic ...Orally, consuming strawberry has been reported to cause allergic reactions, including oral allergy syndrome and skin reactions, in some patients. (103880). Topically, strawberry has caused contact urticaria in one case report (13637). Overall, allergy to strawberry appears to be rare (103880).

VITAMIN D

General ...Orally or intramuscularly, vitamin D is well tolerated.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally or intramuscularly: Excessive doses can lead to vitamin D toxicity with symptoms of hypercalcemia, and also sometimes azotemia and anemia.

Cardiovascular ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses. Rarely, people develop hypertension (10142). An analysis of clinical research suggests that, when taken orally, vitamin D might modestly increase levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol. However, it is not clear if this increase is clinically significant (84642).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, vitamin D may cause dry mouth. In clinical research, intake of vitamin D 50,000 IU weekly for 4 weeks followed by 50,000 IU monthly for 5 months thereafter was associated with a 3.7-fold increase in reports of dry mouth compared with placebo (91348).Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses. Symptoms of vitamin D toxicity include pancreatitis (10142,84433). Vomiting occurred in one patient given a single dose of 200,000 IU (104624).

Genitourinary ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses. Advanced symptoms may include decreased libido (10142). Vaginal discharge and itching have been reported in a clinical trial following oral use (91348).

Hematologic ...Lab values of urinary and blood calcium, phosphate, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, serum cholesterol, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase concentrations might increase with vitamin D use, especially with high doses (10142,91349,93943).
A case of elevated international normalized ration (INR) has been reported for an 84 year-old patient who took vitamin D 50,000 IU daily for 2 months. The patient's serum levels of vitamin D increased from <7 ng/mL to 100 ng/mL over 6 months. To resolve symptoms, vitamin D supplementation was discontinued (84433).

Musculoskeletal ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken in excessive doses (10142,17506). Symptoms of vitamin D toxicity include osteoporosis in adults and decreased growth in children (10142).

Ocular/Otic ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses (10142,17506). Symptoms of vitamin D toxicity include calcific conjunctivitis and photophobia (10142).

Psychiatric ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses (10142,17506). In rare cases, symptoms of vitamin D toxicity include psychosis (10142,93002).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses. Advanced symptoms of vitamin D toxicity may include runny nose (10142,17506,93002).

Renal ...Vitamin D intoxication can occur when vitamin D supplements are taken orally in excessive doses. Symptoms of vitamin D toxicity include azotemia. Vitamin D may also cause hypercalcemia, with advanced symptoms including kidney stones or kidney insufficiency due to precipitation of calcium phosphate in the tubules. Symptoms of renal impairment include frequency, nighttime awakening to urinate, thirst, inability to concentrate urine, and proteinuria. Renal impairment is usually reversible with discontinuation of vitamin D supplements (10142,93002,93943,110831,110833).

General ...Orally, yogurt is usually well tolerated.

Dermatologic ...Orally, consuming yogurt containing Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, and Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12, 4 ounces daily, has been associated with one report of dermatitis in one clinical trial (93707).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, consuming yogurt with or without added probiotics has been reported to cause diarrhea, stomach pain, nausea, and vomiting in clinical research (93703,93707,98504).

Immunologic ...Orally, patients with milk allergy may be allergic to the protein in yogurt. Symptoms include urticaria, wheezing, cough, and rarely vomiting and diarrhea (101751).
Fatal Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus septicemia has been reported in an immunocompromised patient consuming yogurt and taking prolonged courses of multiple broad-spectrum antibiotics (8561).

Oncologic ...Some population research has found that yogurt consumption is associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer (101752). However, other analysis shows no association (93705).

Report an Adverse Reaction to Fat Free Yogurt (Strawberry flavor)