Aloe Vera by BareOrganics

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Acne. Topical aloe gel may reduce acne lesions when used with topical tretinoin in children and adults with acne. Details: One clinical trial in children and adults with acne shows that topical application of a gel containing aloe 50% in the morning and evening, in addition to topical application of tretinoin 0.025% cream and twice daily cleansing with a medical soap, improves acne lesions by approximately 35% more than using the same treatments without aloe (90124).
• Burns. Topical aloe gel or cream may reduce healing time in patients with superficial or partial thickness burns. Details: A meta-analysis of four small clinical trials in patients with second-degree burns shows that use of topical aloe vera reduces time to healing by about 4.4 days when compared to control groups treated with silvadene, silver sulfadiazine, or gauze containing 0.5% chlorhexidine acetate (110209). Most clinical research shows that applying aloe gel or cream topically up to twice daily reduces healing time when compared with silver sulfadiazine (19771,110210,110212), framycetin (19775), vaseline gauze (19773), or placebo (101,97320) in patients with superficial or partial thickness burns. Topical application of aloe cream up to twice daily might also decrease wound size when compared with silver sulfadiazine and framycetin (19771,19775). In addition, some clinical research in patients with burns caused by sulfur mustard shows that applying cream containing aloe and olive oil twice daily for 6 weeks improves pruritus similarly to betamethasone 0.1% cream and may lead to further reductions in excoriation and fissure (19768). However, some preliminary clinical research shows that applying fresh aloe mucilage or aloe extract daily is no more effective than silver sulfadiazine for reducing wound healing time in patients with superficial or partial thickness burns (19774,19776).
• Constipation. Oral aloe latex may improve symptoms in patients with constipation; however, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has banned the use of aloe latex as a laxative due to safety concerns. Details: Taking aloe latex 100-200 mg daily or aloe extract 50 mg as a stimulant laxative seems to relieve constipation due to the cathartic effects of the anthraquinones in the aloe (4,5,8). Taking 1-3 capsules of a formulation containing aloe 150 mg, celandine 300 mg, and psyllium 50 mg also seems to improve stool consistency and the mean number of stools in patients with chronic constipation when compared with placebo (19747). However, in 2002, the U.S. FDA banned the use of aloe latex for constipation due to safety concerns (8229,8443).
• Diabetes. Oral aloe may reduce blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in patients with diabetes. It may be most effective in patients with fasting blood glucose levels of 200 mg/dL or greater. Details: Most clinical research in adults with prediabetes and diabetes shows that taking aloe vera orally can reduce fasting blood glucose by 30-47 mg/dL and HbA1c by 0.41% to 1% (12164,17488,17489,19756,95943,95945,95946). One meta-analysis of 92 patients shows that aloe vera is associated with a larger overall reduction of fasting blood glucose in those with a baseline fasting blood glucose level greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL (95945). Another meta-analysis of 206 patients shows that aloe vera increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels and reduces triglyceride, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels when compared with placebo in adults with prediabetes and untreated diabetes (95943). These analyses include studies that used multiple forms of aloe vera, including gel powder, extract, raw crushed leaves, and fresh extracted juice, as well as multiple doses ranging from 100-1000 mg of powder and 15-150 mL of juice taken for durations ranging from 4-14 weeks. Significant heterogeneity between studies, small sample sizes, and wide variability in the form and dose of aloe used limit the validity of these findings and the ability to identify an effective dose (95943,95945,95946). Additionally, some research has shown no benefit. This may be due to the different forms and doses of aloe used. One clinical study shows that taking aloe gel as 15 mL twice daily or taking aloe juice 15 mL twice daily does not decrease glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes (17420). Other clinical research shows that taking a specific aloe gel complex (Aloe QDM complex, Univera Inc.) containing processed aloe gel 147 mg twice daily for 8 weeks does not affect glycemic indices when compared with placebo in patients with diabetes or prediabetes (90121).
• Genital herpes. Topical aloe extract cream may improve healing of genital herpes lesions. Details: Clinical research in males with genital herpes shows that applying a cream containing aloe extract 0.5% three times daily, 5 days weekly, for up to 2 weeks increases healing rates when compared with aloe gel or placebo. The mean time to healing after application of the aloe extract was 5 days, compared with 12 days with placebo (12164,19745,19746).
• Lichen planus. Rinsing the mouth with aloe-containing mouthwash or applying aloe gel to the mouth or vulva may reduce pain and improve lesion healing in patients with lichen planus. Details: Clinical research in patients with oral lichen planus shows that using 0.4 mL of mouthwash containing aloe gel 70% three times daily for 12 weeks or applying a gel containing aloe mucilage 70% twice daily for 8 weeks is up to 6 times more likely to reduce pain when compared with placebo (19762,19763,19764). However, these findings are questionable due to poor study design. Other clinical research in patients with oral lichen planus shows that using 2 tablespoons of aloe-containing mouthwash four times daily for a month, or applying aloe gel three times daily for 8 weeks, reduces pain and improves lesion healing at least as much as triamcinolone acetonide paste (0.1% in one study) (19765,90130). However, aloe gel may not be as beneficial as laser therapy. A clinical study in patients with lichen planus show that applying a gel containing aloe powder 500 mg to the affected site three times daily for 2 months is less effective for improving pain and lesion healing than receiving low-level laser therapy twice weekly for 2 months. However, no between-group differences were maintained at 7 months after treatment completion (108722). A network meta-analysis of 2 small clinical trials shows that applying aloe trails only purslane of the herbal agents studied with regard to clinical improvement as measured by the Thongprasom scale. However, aloe does not seem to improve complete clinical resolution, clinical scores, or pain (111640). In patients with vulval lichen planus, clinical research shows that topical application with aloe gel twice daily for 8 weeks increases the number of patients who experience clinical improvement of at least 50% when compared with placebo (19766).
• Obesity. Oral aloe gel may modestly reduce body weight and fat mass in adults who are overweight or obese. Details: One clinical trial in overweight and obese adults with diabetes or prediabetes shows that taking a specific aloe gel complex (Aloe QDM complex, Univera Inc.) containing processed aloe gel 147 mg twice daily for 8 weeks reduces body weight by 0.6 kg and fat mass by 1 kg when compared with placebo (90121).
• Oral submucous fibrosis. Topical aloe may reduce burning sensations in patients with oral submucous fibrosis, but it may not improve mouth opening, tongue protrusion, or cheek flexibility in these patients. Details: A meta-analysis of five small clinical studies in patients with oral submucous fibrosis shows that topical application of aloe gel for 3 months reduces burning sensation, possibly for up to two months after treatment, when compared with placebo or active control. A network meta-analysis also found that aloe is most effective in reducing burning sensation, ranked only after treatment with corticosteroids, hyaluronidase, and antioxidants (113514). However, aloe does not seem to improve mouth opening, tongue protrusion, or cheek flexibility (100256). One of the studies included in the analysis used a specific aloe gel (Sheetal lab Surat) 5 mg applied topically on each side of the buccal mucosa three times daily for 3 months (90131). All of the studies included in the analysis were conducted in India, so it is unclear if the results are generalizable to other geographic locations. Limited research has also evaluated the use of topical and oral aloe vera in combination. A small clinical study shows that consuming pure aloe vera juice (Hamant Sai, Sun Vision Company) 30 mL twice daily and applying pure aloe vera gel (Hamant Sai, Sun Vision Company) three times daily for 3 months improves cheek flexibility and tongue protrusion when compared with a treatment regimen consisting of intralesional injections of hydrocortisone acetate 25 mg and hyaluronidase 1500 IU weekly for 6 weeks and supplementation with Cap SM Fibro (Indoco Remedies) twice daily for 3 months. Both treatment regimens show an improvement in mouth opening and burning sensation when compared to baseline, with the aloe vera treatment producing a more rapid improvement in burning sensation (95944). It is not clear how this combination of oral and topical aloe vera compares with topical aloe vera alone.
• Psoriasis. Topical aloe extract cream may reduce erythema and scaling and improve the resolution of psoriatic plaques in patients with psoriasis. Limited research suggests that topical aloe gel does not have the same effects. Details: Applying aloe extract 0.5% cream topically three times daily for 4 weeks significantly improves and increases the resolution of psoriatic plaques when compared with placebo (101,12096,12164). Aloe extract cream also seems to reduce desquamation, erythema, and infiltration (12096). Other preliminary clinical research shows that applying cream containing aloe mucilage 70% twice daily for 8 weeks improves psoriasis severity more effectively than triamcinolone 0.1% cream, although both treatments had similar effects on dermatology-specific quality of life (19741). Treatment with aloe gel does not seem to improve erythema, infiltration, and desquamation associated with psoriasis when compared with placebo (19748).
• Traumatic oral ulcers. Topical aloe gel may prevent oral ulcers after application of orthodontic appliances in adolescents and adults. Details: Clinical research in patients aged 12 years and older shows that applying a gel containing aloe 80% to the gums twice daily for one month after the cementation of orthodontic appliances prevents the development of mouth ulcers when compared with a chlorhexidine gel. Ulcers occurred in about 6% of patients using the aloe gel compared with 81% of those using the chlorhexidine gel. Bleeding and inflammation were also reduced (103305).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alveolar osteitis. It is unclear if topical aloe or the aloe constituent acemannan is beneficial in patients with alveolar osteitis. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with alveolar osteitis shows that applying a patch containing the aloe constituent acemannan (SaliCept patch) to the tooth socket, once after curettage and irrigation and again 3 days later, reduces pain intensity and improves clinical symptoms when compared with curettage and irrigation alone (19754).
• Amenorrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral aloe for amenorrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Anal fissures. It is unclear if topical aloe is beneficial in patients with anal fissures. Details: One small clinical study in patients with chronic anal fissures shows that applying an aloe cream containing 0.5% powdered spray-dried inner aloe leaf juice (Zarban Phyto-Pharmaceutical Co) three times daily for at least 3 weeks, as an adjuvant to sitz baths three times daily, using a laxative, and eating a full fiber diet, improves pain, wound healing, and bleeding severity when compared with placebo (90129).
• Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral aloe for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Topical aloe has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with atopic dermatitis shows that application of a specific combination cream (Olivederma, Kimi Daru Pharmaceutical Co.) containing aloe gel and virgin olive oil twice daily for 6 weeks improves disease severity and quality of life when compared with betamethasone cream (105020). It is unclear if this effect is due to aloe, olive oil, or the combination.
• Breast engorgement. It is unclear if topical aloe improves lactation-associated breast pain. Details: Meta-analyses of 4-5 clinical trials in lactating patients show that use of topical aloe modestly reduces nipple/breast pain and irritation when compared with no treatment, routine care with topical breast milk or breast massage, or treatment with lanolin (110213). However, studies included in this analysis were not specific to breast engorgement.
• Burning mouth syndrome. It is unclear if topical aloe is beneficial in patients with burning mouth syndrome. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with chronic burning mouth syndrome shows that applying 0.5 mL of aloe 70% gel to sore areas on the tongue three times daily prior to wearing a tongue protector for 12 weeks does not improve pain or symptoms when compared with placebo gel or using the tongue protector alone in patients with chronic burning mouth syndrome (90127). However, differences in baseline pain ratings between study groups limit the validity of these findings.
• Cancer. Oral aloe has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study in patients with lung cancer shows that, when administered with standard chemotherapy, three daily doses of 10 mL of a mixture consisting of fresh aloe leaves 300 grams plus honey 500 grams dissolved in 40 mL of alcohol 40% increases the rate of complete response, partial response, or disease control when compared with chemotherapy alone (19752).
• Canker sores. Small clinical studies suggest that applying the aloe constituent acemannan to cancer sores may reduce ulcer size, but not pain. However, the effect of aloe is unclear. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that topical aloe is no more effective than control interventions for reducing the size and pain of oral ulcers (110216). Control interventions have included carrier gel or triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% (19751,110216). However, a recent clinical trial shows that topical aloe gel (G.U.M Canker-X, Sunstar Americas, Schaumburg, USA) after meals and before bedtime for 5 days is more effective than amlexanox 5% paste and placebo for reducing pain and the size of canker sores in patients with recurrent symptoms (110215). Other small clinical trials have investigated the effects of fermented aloe or the aloe constituent acemannan. One small clinical trial in adults with recurrent canker sores shows that applying a fermented aloe gel to oral ulcers three times daily seems to accelerate healing time when compared with chitosan gel (104173). Another small clinical trial in patients with canker sores shows that using a wound dressing containing the aloe constituent acemannan (Carrisyn Gel Wound Dressing) shortens the average healing time of canker sores when compared with an oral analgesic (Orabase-Plain) (19750). Other clinical research shows that applying acemannan 0.5% in Carbopol 934P NF three times daily for 7 days reduces ulcer size, but not pain, when compared with Carbopol 934P NF alone in patients with canker sores (90123). However, applying triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% appears to be more effective in reducing pain and similarly effective in reducing ulcer size when compared with acemannan 0.5% (90123).
• Common cold. Although there has been interest in using oral aloe for the common cold, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Dental plaque. Using aloe-containing toothpaste may reduce dental plaque in adults; however, it is unclear if this is more effective than fluoride-containing toothpaste. Rinsing with an aloe-containing mouthwash may reduce dental plaque in children. Details: One small clinical trial in adults shows that brushing teeth with a dentifrice containing aloe gel (Forever Bright, Forever Living Products) three times daily for 30 days does not reduce the occurrence of plaque better than a fluoridated dentifrice (Sorriso Dentes Brancos, Kolynos do Brasil), although both treatments seem to show improvement when compared to baseline (19755). Another small clinical study in adults with gingivitis shows that using toothpaste containing aloe daily for 24 weeks reduces plaque more effectively than placebo or triclosan-containing toothpaste (19760). In children aged 8-14 years with mild plaque, using a mouth wash containing aloe vera 7% twice daily for 4 weeks reduced plaque by a large amount when compared with placebo. In addition, it was as effective as chlorhexidine 0.2% (103306).
• Depression. Although there has been interest in using oral aloe for depression, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Diabetic foot ulcers. It is unclear whether topical aloe is beneficial for patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with a stage 1 or 2 diabetic foot ulcer who are receiving oral antibiotics shows that applying a topical product containing aloe and great plantain twice daily for 4 weeks reduces ulcer surface area and time to healing, but not ulcer depth, when compared with antibiotics alone (97323). The effect of applying aloe gel alone without concomitant oral antibiotic therapy is unknown.
• Diaper rash. Topical aloe has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical trial shows that applying a cream containing aloe gel and olive oil three times daily for 5-10 days reduces diaper rash severity in children less than 3 years of age when compared to baseline; however, it does not seem to be as effective as calendula ointment (19779). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a placebo group.
• Dry mouth. It is unclear if rinsing with an aloe-containing mouthwash is beneficial for dry mouth. Details: In patients with dry mouth related to type 2 diabetes, clinical research shows that an aloe vera 50% mouthwash, as 20 mL swished and spit three times daily for 14 days, modestly reduces symptoms of dry mouth when compared with rinsing with a saline control mouthwash (106068). The validity of this study is limited due to unclear reporting.
• Dry skin. Topical aloe or oral aloe sterols may improve some measures of dry skin. However, findings are mixed due to the use of varied formulations and doses. Details: One small clinical trial shows that applying a cream containing freeze-dried aloe extract 0.1% to 0.5% to the skin for 2 weeks increases the amount of water in the stratum corneum, but does not reduce transepidermal water loss, when compared with placebo (19758). Another small clinical study in females with occupational dry skin shows that wearing gloves coated in aloe 8 hours daily for 30 days improves symptoms of dry skin when compared with no treatment (19759). However, it is not clear if the benefits resulted from applying aloe or wearing gloves. One small clinical trial in healthy females shows that consumption of a yogurt containing 500 mg of aloe vera gel powder (0.4 mg of aloe sterol) daily for 12 weeks increases skin hydration, skin elasticity, and collagen content of the dermis while reducing markers of skin fatigue and transepidermal water loss when compared with placebo (95942). However, another study in healthy females shows that taking aloe sterol-enriched aloe extract 0.5 grams daily for 12 weeks does not improve skin hydration when compared with placebo, although redness, itching, collagen content, and transepidermal water loss were improved (101577).
• Epilepsy. Although there has been interest in using oral aloe for epilepsy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Frostbite. Although there has been interest in using topical aloe for frostbite, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Gingivitis. Using aloe-containing toothpaste may reduce gingivitis in adults, but it does not seem to be more effective than fluoride-containing toothpaste. Rinsing with an aloe-containing mouthwash may reduce gingivitis in children. Details: One small clinical trial in adults shows that brushing teeth with a dentifrice containing aloe gel (Forever Bright, Forever Living Products) three times daily for 30 days does not reduce the occurrence of gingivitis more effectively than a fluoridated dentifrice (Sorriso Dentes Brancos, Kolynos do Brasil), although both treatments seem to show improvement when compared to baseline (19755). Another small clinical study in adults with gingivitis shows that using aloe-containing toothpaste daily for 24 weeks reduces gingivitis more effectively than placebo, but not more than triclosan-containing toothpaste (19760). In children aged 8-14 years with mild gingivitis, using a mouthwash containing aloe vera 7% twice daily for 4 weeks reduced gingivitis by a large amount when compared with placebo. In addition, it was as effective as chlorhexidine 0.2% (103306).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral aloe is beneficial in patients with systolic heart failure. Details: A very small clinical study in adults with moderate to moderately severe chronic systolic heart failure shows that taking aloe vera gel capsules 150 mg twice daily for 8 weeks in addition to standard treatment decreases New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, improves Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) total, physical, emotional, and social scores, and enhances sleep quality but does not reduce the severity of obstructive sleep apnea scores or improve six-minute walk test distance when compared with placebo (111663). The study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. Additionally, the validity of these effects may be limited by the small sample size.
• Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Oral and topical aloe have only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation shows that treatment with colostrum and aloe orally (Remargin Colostrum Gastro-Gel, Solimè srl, Cavriago, Reggio Emilia, Italy) and as a mouthwash (Remargin Colostrum OS, Solimè srl, Cavriago, Reggio Emilia, Italy) modestly reduces the risk and duration of severe oral mucositis and febrile neutropenia when compared with historical values. There was no effect on the duration of neutropenia, the length of hospital stay, pain, or duration of medications. All patients were also given standard care. The mouthwash was used after each oral hygiene, and the oral treatment was 3 to 5 times daily depending on symptoms (110211).
• Hepatitis. It is unclear if oral aloe is beneficial in patients with hepatitis. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with liver fibrosis primarily caused by hepatitis B or hepatitis C shows that taking a high molecular weight fraction of aloe 0.05 grams three times daily for 12 weeks reduces fibrosis, attenuates liver enzyme activity, and decreases hepatic glutathione content when compared with placebo (19780).
• HIV/AIDS. Small clinical studies suggest that oral aloe or the aloe constituent acemannan may not improve CD4 counts or viral load in patients with HIV. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with HIV shows that taking the aloe constituent, acemannan, 400 mg four times daily does not significantly improve CD4 counts, ratio of CD4 to CD8, or viral load when compared with placebo (19851). Another small clinical study in patients with HIV shows that taking aloe gruel 30-40 mL daily does not improve CD4 counts when compared with those treated with antiretroviral therapy, although both groups show similar increases in weight compared to baseline (19852).
• Hyperlipidemia. Although there has been interest in using oral aloe for hyperlipidemia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Hypertrophic scars. Topical aloe has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical trial in patients undergoing median sternotomy shows that applying a silicone gel containing aloe extract and other herbal extracts (Bangkok Botanica) to postoperative hypertrophic scars for 6 months reduces the height of the scar and improves pliability by a moderate amount when compared with a silicone placebo gel. There was no effect on pigmentation or vascularity (102793). It is unknown whether any benefit is related to aloe, other ingredients, or their combination.
• Influenza. Oral aloe has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy adults shows that taking a combination supplement containing aloe vera gel, rosemary, and poria mushrooms twice daily 28 days before administering the influenza vaccine and 28 days after vaccination does not improve immunologic markers or reduce symptom severity, symptom duration, frequency of upper respiratory tract infection symptoms, or the use of cold and flu medications when compared with placebo (111921).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Small clinical studies suggest that oral aloe extract or juice may not improve symptoms in patients with IBS. Details: Most research suggests that aloe is not effective for improving symptoms of IBS; however, the available evidence is of low-quality, with some studies having high dropout rates or inadequate power to detect significant differences. Two clinical trials show that taking a specific aloe extract (AVH200, Calmino Group AB) 250-500 mg twice daily for 4 weeks does not improve IBS-related symptoms or response rates when compared with placebo (101579,104169), although one of these studies did find a trend toward a higher response rate, defined as a 50% or greater improvement in symptom scores, with aloe over placebo (104169). Also, a pooled analysis of these two studies shows that taking this specific product improves IBS-related pain severity and frequency in patients with diarrhea-prominent IBS (IBS-D) when compared with placebo, but does not seem to improve stool consistency or frequency (108718). Clinical trials evaluating aloe juice 50 mL four times daily for 1 month or 60 mL twice daily for 5 months show no significant improvement in quality of life scores or IBS symptoms when compared with placebo (104170,104171), although one study did find a trend toward improved response in patients with IBS-D (104171). Despite a lack of significant findings in the individual studies, a pooled analysis of the two smallest studies above (104169,104171) shows that aloe extract or juice, taken for 4 weeks, may increase the rate of symptom response by almost 70% when compared with placebo (103307).
• Nipple Fissures. It is unclear if application of an aloe poultice improves nipple-related complications of breastfeeding, such as nipple fissures. Details: A clinical study in females who have just given birth and are breastfeeding for the first time shows that applying a poultice containing aloe gel to the nipples after breastfeeding six times daily for 5 days improves nipple eschar when compared with no treatment. Although there were modest improvements in other outcomes, such as redness, fissures, and epidermolysis, these differences were not significant (108721). Participants were instructed to clean with purified water before the next breastfeeding session.
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Although there has been interest in using oral aloe for MS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Oral mucositis. Small clinical studies suggest that oral aloe juice or application of aloe solution inside the mouth may prevent oral mucositis in patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation. Details: Some clinical research shows that drinking 15 mL of juice containing aloe 80% three times daily during radiation therapy decreases the risk of developing moderate or severe mucositis by approximately 39% when compared with placebo (19767,19964). In addition, in children aged 3-6 years undergoing chemotherapy for leukemia, application of a solution containing aloe 70% twice daily inside the mouth, starting three days before chemotherapy, reduces the severity of oral mucositis and delays its onset by 2 weeks when compared with sodium bicarbonate 5% (103304). Other clinical research in adults with head and neck cancer shows that rinsing and then swallowing 20 mL of a solution containing aloe juice 94.5% four times daily throughout the course of radiation therapy does not prevent mucositis when compared with placebo (19963). However, this study was not adequately powered to detect significant differences between study groups. Aloe has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients for the treatment of oral mucositis. Preliminary clinical research in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation shows that treatment with colostrum and aloe orally (Remargin Colostrum Gastro-Gel, Solimè srl, Cavriago, Reggio Emilia, Italy) and as a mouthwash (Remargin Colostrum OS, Solimè srl, Cavriago, Reggio Emilia, Italy) modestly reduces the risk and duration of severe oral mucositis when compared with historical values. There was no effect on overall risk or time of onset of mucositis. All patients were also given standard care. The mouthwash was used after each oral hygiene, and the oral treatment was 3 to 5 times daily depending on symptoms (110211). Another small clinical study in adults with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy shows that rinsing with 5 mL of a mouthwash containing aloe, German chamomile, peppermint oil, and honey 3 times daily for 60 seconds for 6 weeks starting on the first day of radiotherapy reduces oral mucositis incidence, severity, and pain when compared with chlorhexidine and placebo (111291). It is unclear if these findings are due to aloe, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Osteoarthritis. Although there has been interest in using oral and topical aloe for osteoarthritis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Peptic ulcers. Although there has been interest in using oral aloe for peptic ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Periodontitis. It is unclear if application of aloe inside the mouth is beneficial for chronic periodontitis. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in patients with chronic periodontitis shows that using various aloe-containing gels, mouthwashes, and toothpastes improves plaque index when compared with placebo or other treatments (i.e., chlorhexidine rinse, metformin, and tea tree oil). The effect of these aloe products on gingival index could not be determined (108719). The validity of this finding is limited by the variety of aloe formulations and comparators used in the included studies.
• Pressure ulcers. It is unclear if topical aloe is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of pressure ulcers. Details: One small clinical study shows that applying a gel containing the aloe constituent acemannan to pressure ulcers daily for 10 weeks does not reduce the time to healing when compared with management with moist saline gauze (12160,19853). Another small clinical study conducted in Iran in patients with category II pressure ulcers shows that applying topical aloe vera gel after cleaning with normal saline and prior to dressing daily for 15 days reduces pain during dressing changes when compared with normal saline dressing (113672). Other clinical research shows that cleansing wounds with a saline spray containing aloe, silver chloride, and decyl glucoside for 2 weeks improves pressure ulcer healing when compared with isotonic saline spray (19854). It is unclear if this improvement is due to aloe, other ingredients, or the combination in the spray. Aloe has also been evaluated for the prevention of pressure ulcers. A small clinical study in hospitalized patients in an orthopedic ward shows that applying aloe vera gel to the hips, sacrum, and heels twice daily for 10 days reduces pressure ulcer occurrence to 3 of 39 patients, compared to 12 of 38 patients of those receiving placebo (98816). However, methodological limitations with this study, including differences in how the gels were applied, limit the reliability of these results. A clinical study in hospitalized patients receiving intensive care has evaluated either aloe gel 94%, olive oil 100%, or a compounded product containing aloe vera and olive oil in a 3:2 ratio, applied to pressure areas as 10-15 mL every 8 hours. At the end of 30 days, pressure ulcers occurred in 17% of patients receiving the combination product, 20% receiving olive oil, 33% receiving aloe gel, and 37% receiving standard care, suggesting that any benefit may be due to olive oil (108723).
• Radiation dermatitis. There is conflicting evidence about the effectiveness of topical aloe gel for preventing or delaying dermatitis in patients undergoing radiation therapy. These conflicting findings may be due to differences in study designs, products used, and application practices. Details: Two meta-analyses of clinical trials, some of which overlap, in patients with various types of cancer shows that topical aloe does not reduce the incidence or severity of radiation dermatitis (110325,113674) and does not reduce the incidence of erythema, pruritis, moist desquamation, or dry desquamation when compared with control (110325). However, the included studies are limited by a lack of blinding, questionable methodological quality, and a high risk of bias. In contrast, another meta-analysis of generally poor quality randomized controlled trials shows that topical pre-treatment application with aloe as gel, cream, lotion, or fresh plant reduces the risk of radiation dermatitis by 23%, especially mild to moderate radiation dermatitis, when compared with a control group not treated with aloe (110214). One U.S. study included in the analysis shows that applying aloe 98% gel twice daily starting within three days of radiation initiation does not reduce radiation dermatitis when compared with a placebo gel or no treatment (12163). Other research has focused on specific side effects. One clinical trial shows that applying aloe 98% gel three times daily throughout radiation treatment and after treatment does not seem to reduce symptoms of radiation dermatitis in patients being treated for breast cancer (12098). Some research shows that applying aloe 100% gel 6-8 times daily might prolong the time before radiation-related side effects occur, but only when the cumulative dose of radiation is high (>2,700 cGy) (12159). In addition, applying aloe-based gel once daily after radiation treatment is less effective than applying anionic phospholipid-based cream for reducing dryness, erythema, and peeling in children being treated for Hodgkin disease (19855). Aloe has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small cohort study in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiation therapy shows that applying aloe 2% and radish 4% gel twice daily until ten days after the last radiotherapy session prevents radiation dermatitis as shown by fewer cases of radiation dermatitis in the 10th, 30th, and 35th radiation sessions when compared with placebo. Furthermore, after the 35th session, the subjects prophylactically treated with the aloe and radish gel had milder grades of radiation dermatitis when compared with control (111662). A preliminary clinical study shows that applying a specific cream product (Radioskin 2, Herbalab di Perazza Massimiliano Company), which contains aloe, ginkgo extract, and metal esculetina, along with another specific cream product (Radioskin 1, Herbalab di Perazza Massimiliano Company), which contains alga atlantica and ethylbisiminomethylguaicolo manganese cloruro, may improve skin hydration and reduce skin toxicity associated with radiation therapy in patients with breast cancer (89727). These creams were applied topically 2-3 times daily at least 3 hours before and after radiation treatment, from 15 days prior to radiation until one month after completion.
• Radiation proctopathy. It is unclear if topical aloe is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of radiation proctopathy. Details: One very small clinical study in females with radiation proctopathy shows that applying 1 gram of an ointment containing aloe vera 3% rectally twice daily in conjunction with taking sulfasalazine 500 mg four times daily for 4 weeks modestly reduces diarrhea, fecal urgency, radiation toxicity, and clinical symptoms when compared with sulfasalazine alone (95941). This same product, applied twice daily for 6 weeks starting on the first day of radiotherapy, has also been evaluated for the prevention of radiation proctopathy. One small clinical study in patients with pelvic cancer shows that applying this ointment prevents proctopathy-related diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and fecal urgency when compared with placebo. Proctopathy-related symptoms occurred in 5% of patients using aloe, compared with 65% of those using placebo. However, there was no difference in rectal pain, constipation, or symptoms of cystitis between groups (101578). A very small clinical study in patients with colorectal cancer shows that applying this ointment prevents proctopathy-related diarrhea and reduces proctopathy severity, but does not improve rectal bleeding, rectal pain, fecal urgency, or symptoms of cystitis, when compared with placebo (108717). Reasons for discrepancies are unclear but might relate to differences in cancer diagnosis and radiation regimens.
• Scabies. It is unclear if topical aloe is beneficial in patients with scabies. Details: One small open-label clinical study in children and adults with scabies shows that application of crude aloe gel for 3 consecutive days, repeated again after one week, may reduce itching and lesions similar to benzyl benzoate lotion in patients with scabies when compared to baseline (19769). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a placebo group.
• Seborrheic dermatitis. It is unclear if topical aloe is beneficial in patients with seborrheic dermatitis. Details: One small clinical study in adults with seborrheic dermatitis shows that applying aloe 30% emulsion twice daily for 4-6 weeks reduces scaling, itching, and the number of sites involved, but not erythema, when compared with placebo (19749).
• Stretch marks (striae gravidarum). It is unclear if topical aloe is effective for the prevention or treatment of stretch marks. Details: One small clinical trial in nulliparous patients shows that topical application of a cream containing aloe twice daily, starting at gestational week 16-18, reduces erythema and itching related to abdominal stretch marks, but does not seem to decrease the number of stretch marks, when compared with a base cream (97322). Aloe gel has also been evaluated in combination with fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser treatments. A small clinical trial shows that applying a gel containing aloe 87.4% twice daily for up to one month after each of three CO2 laser treatments improves the texture of the skin for up to 6 months after the last laser treatment when compared to baseline. This was as effective as topical recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF) and CO2 laser treatments. However, when specific sites were examined, only the texture of stretch marks on the buttocks were improved, and these improvements were less than those seen with rhEGF (101580). The effect of aloe for the prevention of stretch marks is unknown.
• Sunburn. Although there has been interest in using topical aloe for sunburn, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Tungiasis. Topical aloe has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One clinical study shows that applying a product containing coconut oil, jojoba oil, and aloe leaf extract (Zanzarin, Engelhard Arzneimittel GmbH & Co. KG) to the feet twice daily for one-week intervals seems to reduce the number of embedded sandfleas in individuals with tungiasis when compared with a control group (19778). It is not clear if this effect is due to aloe, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Ulcerative colitis. It is unclear if oral aloe gel is beneficial in patients with ulcerative colitis. Details: One small clinical trial in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis shows that taking aloe gel for 4 weeks, starting at 25-50 mL twice daily for the first 3 days and increasing to 100 mL twice daily thereafter, reduces symptoms when compared with placebo (11984).
• Vaginitis. It is unclear if topical aloe is beneficial for vaginitis. Details: One small clinical trial in postmenopausal patients with atrophic vaginitis shows that applying 5 mg of a vaginal cream containing aloe gel 2% nightly for 2 weeks, then 3 nights per week for 4 weeks, reduces vaginal dryness, burning, and pain during intercourse and improves measures of vaginal health and maturity when compared to baseline. These effects were similar to those seen with estrogen vaginal cream (104175).
• Varicose veins. Although there has been interest in using oral and topical aloe for varicose veins, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose.
• Wound healing. There is conflicting evidence about the effectiveness of topical aloe products for improving wound healing. These conflicting findings may be due to differences in study designs, products used, and application practices. Details: One small clinical study shows that applying aloe gel to a caesarean wound after surgery, followed by a dry gauze, improves wound healing over the first 24 hours when compared with the dry gauze alone (90128). However, other clinical research in a small number of patients undergoing gynecologic surgery or cesarean section shows that applying an aloe gel extract (Carrington Dermal Wound Gel) to surgical wounds may actually delay wound healing (11982). Another small clinical trial shows that applying a formulation of aloe gel 0.5% cream (Zarband, Phytopharmaceutical Co.) to hemorrhoidectomy wounds three times daily for 4 weeks improves healing rates and pain relief scores and decreases intake of narcotic analgesics when compared with placebo (17418). However, another clinical trial in patients with biopsy wounds shows that application of a hydrogel containing the aloe constituent, acemannan (Carrasyn, Carrington hydrogel), does not improve wound epithelialization, wound infections, or pain when compared with conventional therapy (19856). Additionally, there is contradictory evidence about the effectiveness of aloe for improving skin graft donor site healing. One small clinical study shows that applying aloe gel 87.4% daily to split-thickness skin graft donor sites reduces time to complete healing by about 2 days when compared with placebo (97320). However, another small clinical study shows that applying aloe cream three times daily to split-thickness skin graft donor sites does not improve healing time when compared with placebo (97321).
• Wrinkled skin. Although there has been interest in using topical aloe for wrinkled skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of aloe for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate aloe for these uses.

(Read more about ALOE)

EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Oral calcium carbonate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an antacid. Details: Taking calcium carbonate orally as an antacid is effective for treating dyspepsia (1843). Calcium carbonate has FDA approval as an antacid.
• Hyperkalemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities. Details: Administering calcium gluconate intravenously can reverse electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias induced by hyperkalemia (12946). Intravenous calcium gluconate is FDA-approved for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities.
• Hypocalcemia. Oral calcium treats and prevents hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium is used to treat severe hypocalcemia. Details: Taking calcium orally is effective for treating and preventing hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate, acetate, gluceptate, or chloride is effective for severe hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany (12928).
• Kidney failure. Oral calcium carbonate or calcium acetate is used as a phosphate binder during kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium carbonate or calcium acetate orally is effective as a phosphate binder. Calcium acetate (PhosLo) appears to control hyperphosphatemia better than sevelamer (Renagel) (12943,12944,38990). Calcium citrate is not recommended for this purpose because it increases aluminum absorption and does not bind phosphate as efficiently as calcium acetate or calcium carbonate (21631). Some clinical research also shows that taking calcium orally reduces blood pressure in patients with kidney failure (975).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral calcium in combination with vitamin D prevents bone density loss that occurs during long-term treatment with corticosteroids. Details: Taking calcium in combination with vitamin D as adjunctive therapy seems to be effective for reducing bone mineral density loss in people using corticosteroids long-term (982,1046,1830,1831,1832,4462,4463,4464,4465,4466)(4467,12945,38493). One specific product used in clinical research is Oscal (Marion Merrel Dow Inc.), which contains elemental calcium 500 mg per tablet plus vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (982). Another product used is Oscal 250 + D (SmithKline Beecham Healthcare), which contains elemental calcium 250 mg and vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (1046).
• Hyperparathyroidism. Oral calcium reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium orally reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with kidney failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism (1827,1828,1829,39174,39425). In elderly women, the combination of calcium and vitamin D reverses secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces hip fracture risk (8818). Also, population research suggests increased calcium intake from the diet and supplements reduces the risk of primary hyperparathyroidism in women. Supplemental intakes of at least 500 mg/day and dietary intakes of approximately 1100 mg/day are considered to be protective (91353).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate calcium intake, from the diet and/or supplements, is recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate calcium intake in line with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) by age, along with adequate vitamin D intake, for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake when adequate dietary intake is not feasible (109425). In the US and Canada, foods containing at least 200 mg calcium with less phosphorous content than calcium can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate calcium intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (11940,102148). However, calcium supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Also, calcium supplements do not seem to be effective for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) during lactation (988), in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation (1817), or in patients who have had renal transplantation (4823,38736,38871). Maximal bone growth occurs in the teenage years, and then BMD in females remains relatively constant until age 30-40. After age 40, bone loss typically occurs at rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. In males, this occurs several decades later. Bone loss is more pronounced if dietary calcium intake is below the RDA, which is the case for many Americans (2571,2578). One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy children 7-14 years old shows that fortifying food with calcium 250-1000 mg daily for up to 24 months modestly improves femoral neck BMD, but not hip or spine BMD. However, the included trials did not supplement vitamin D (107232). During the 5 years immediately after menopause, calcium supplementation has very little effect on bone loss (2569,2570,2575,2576). The rapid loss of estrogen causes a high bone resorption rate, which increases serum calcium levels and therefore decreases intestinal absorption of calcium (2570). After this period, the typical rate of bone loss is 2% per year (2572,2576). Taking calcium 1000-1600 mg daily as carbonate, citrate, lactate gluconate, or citrate malate salt decreases this rate by 0.25% to 1% annually (977,979,981,2569,2571,2572,2575,2576,2578,6850)(38978,38980,39064). The greatest reductions (1% or more) are seen in the first 1-2 years of supplementation when bone remodeling foci can be filled (2569,2576). After this period, the differences in rate of loss between supplemented and non-supplemented females are closer to 0.25% per year (2569,2577). A meta-analysis of clinical evidence suggests that there is no additional benefit after 4 years (38980). Small clinical studies have found that continuous calcium supplementation at an average daily dose of 1050 mg, started after menopause and continued for 1.5-4 years, may reduce fracture rates by 26% when compared with no calcium supplementation. The largest of these studies was conducted in nursing home residents who also received daily vitamin D; the benefits of calcium, specifically, are unclear (39386). Some research also suggests that calcium and vitamin D improves primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in some older individuals with osteoporosis, particularly the elderly and those who are no longer community dwelling (12930,38875,38849,39026,109471). However, not all research is positive. One large clinical trial in elderly adults with a low-trauma fracture show that taking calcium 1000 mg daily with or without vitamin D 800 IU daily for 2-7 years does not reduce the risk of a second fracture when compared with placebo (13073). Another clinical study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 800 IU daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (less than 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). Also, some exploratory research suggests that supplements may need to be continued indefinitely; in adults over 68 years of age, any effects of 2 years of calcium supplements on BMD appear to be lost within 2 years after discontinuing supplements (6853). Calcium has additive effects when used with other agents such as vitamin D, estrogens, or calcitonin. Whereas calcium alone generally reduces or prevents loss of BMD, combination with other agents can produce small increases in BMD ranging from 0.3% to 3.3% depending on the combination and dosages used (978,980,1836,2570,2571,2572,2576). However, one meta-analysis in healthy adults shows that fortifying foods with calcium 250-1000 mg daily, in conjunction with vitamin D supplementation, for up to 24 months does not improve BMD when compared with control (107232). The full potential of osteoporosis treatments cannot be realized without adequate calcium intake (2569,2570,2571,2572). Advise patients taking agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene (Evista) to ensure that their daily calcium intake meets the RDA. Use supplements if necessary. The usefulness of calcium in preventing osteoporosis in males is not as well-studied. Some observational research has found that calcium 870 mg daily is not associated with changes in BMD and bone loss in males (97201). However, clinical evidence suggests that taking calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years might improve trabecular or cortical bone mass by 2% to 4% (980,8827,8873). Dietary supplementation with calcium and vitamin D seems to moderately reduce bone loss measured in the femoral neck, spine, and total body, and seems to reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in older patients with osteopenia or low BMD (980).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Adequate calcium intake seems to prevent symptoms of PMS. Details: There seems to be a link between low dietary calcium intake and symptoms of PMS (2004,6847,39007). Taking calcium 1000-1336 mg daily seems to significantly reduce depressed mood, water retention, and pain, especially if daily calcium intake is inadequate (1822,1823,1824,2004,95821). Calcium carbonate 1200 mg daily seems to decrease PMS symptom scores by about 18% when compared with placebo (1822). Increasing dietary calcium intake is also associated with a decreased risk of developing PMS. Consuming an average of 1283 mg of calcium per day from foods is associated with about a 30% lower risk of developing PMS compared with consuming an average of 529 mg daily (13094); however, taking calcium supplements does not appear to be associated with the risk of developing PMS.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Oral calcium seems to be beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer, especially in those with adequate vitamin D levels and normal body mass index (BMI). Details: Population studies have found that increased intake of dietary or supplemental calcium is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas (1047,8820,12120,38951,98898,98899). Clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research also show that taking calcium supplements 1.2-2 grams daily for up to 4 years can reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence by up to 29% (970,12118,12950,15267,34596,38718,39042,95817). However, not all research has been positive. Some meta-analyses of clinical research or observational studies suggest that taking calcium does not reduce the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer (34596,39042,39349). Other contradictory research suggests that postmenopausal females who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290); however, this finding may not be reliable due to the high baseline intake of calcium in study participants. The reason for these conflicting findings is not entirely clear. Vitamin D might be an important factor. People with lower than average vitamin D levels do not seem to get any benefit from calcium supplements (12118). Also, one meta-analysis of previous trials suggests that taking calcium 1200 mg daily reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas in people with a normal BMI, but not in those who are overweight or obese (99715). Despite this conflicting evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2005 stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence to support this claim (102366).
• Fetal bone mineralization. If calcium intakes are low during pregnancy, oral calcium seems to be beneficial for increasing fetal bone density. Details: With low dietary calcium intake (less than 562 mg elemental calcium daily) during pregnancy, calcium supplementation increases fetal bone mineralization and density. However, calcium supplementation does not offer any additional benefit if calcium intakes are adequate (3263,3264).
• Hypertension. Oral calcium seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount in adults with or without hypertension. However, it is unclear if this reduction is clinically significant. Details: Many clinical trials and observational studies, including a meta-analysis of 18 high-quality clinical trials, show that intake of calcium supplements or dietary calcium modestly reduces systolic blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension, usually around 1-2 mmHg. Calcium seems to be more effective for certain subpopulations of patients, such as those who are salt-sensitive or have low baseline dietary calcium intake (945,972,974,976,984,1818,1819,1820,1821,6852)(13138,14406,38803,39063,39094,39221,113920,113925). However, a large-scale clinical trial in postmenopausal females shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg daily does not lower blood pressure or reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials shows that taking calcium in combination with vitamin D for up to 7 years has no effect on blood pressure (98861). The validity of this finding is limited by the poor methodological quality of the included studies. Some observational research suggests that calcium can reduce the risk for hypertension. Population research in females aged 45 years and older suggests that higher intake of calcium from both diet and supplemental sources is linked to a lower risk of developing hypertension when compared to lower calcium intake (14265). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension. However, the FDA has concluded that this claim is based on supporting, rather than conclusive, evidence (102367). Research evaluating the effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on the child's blood pressure has yielded conflicting findings. A systematic review of 2 clinical studies and 3 observational studies found that calcium intake during pregnancy is associated with a 1-2 mmHg reduction in the systolic blood pressure of the offspring between the ages of 1-7 years (38852). However, a separate meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies shows that calcium intake during pregnancy does not reduce systolic or diastolic blood pressure in the offspring (113923).
• Osteomalacia. Oral calcium seems to reverse osteomalacia caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Osteomalacia is commonly caused by vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to osteomalacia in children and adults. Calcium supplementation can reverse osteomalacia caused by calcium deficiency. Along with appropriate vitamin D supplementation, individuals at risk of osteomalacia need sufficient calcium intake (94819).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral calcium seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia, especially in high-risk individuals and those with low baseline dietary calcium intake. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (971,38756), most clinical research shows that taking calcium orally 1-2 grams daily reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia (973,1833,8828,39043,39319,39426,97348,113919). A large clinical trial of 11,000 pregnant individuals in India and Tanzania shows that supplementation with 500 mg daily is similarly effective to 1500 mg daily (113908). Multiple meta-analyses which include 16-30 clinical studies have found that varying doses of calcium supplementation reduce the relative risk of pre-eclampsia by 46% to 51% when compared with placebo (97348,113909,113919). One of these meta-analyses found that for every 19 females treated with calcium, one episode of pre-eclampsia would be avoided (97348). Additionally, one of these meta-analyses found that calcium reduces the relative risk of pre-eclampsia by 51%, regardless of whether it is taken at a dose above or below 1000 mg daily (113919). Some research suggests that calcium supplementation may have a greater effect in individuals at high risk of pre-eclampsia or with low baseline dietary calcium intake, and when taken at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation (15029,38497,97348,99714,113919). However, another meta-analysis of 30 clinical studies found a similar benefit of calcium in both high- and low-risk individuals (113919). A separate meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies conducted in China evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy. This combination was associated with an 80% lower relative risk of pre-eclampsia and an 83% lower relative risk of pre-eclampsia with gestational hypertension when compared with routine care (113913). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding the use of calcium supplements to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. However, due to the limited and conflicting research available at that time, the FDA stated that this outcome was highly unlikely (102366). Since then, large, high-quality clinical research has supported this finding. In fact, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released a recommendation to prescribe oral calcium 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancies at high risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary calcium intakes are low (97347).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. Oral calcium may reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Details: A meta-analysis of 17 clinical studies shows that calcium supplementation during pregnancy may reduce the relative risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension by 30% when compared with control (113909). A separate meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies conducted in China, which evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy, shows that this combination reduces the relative risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension by 85% when compared with routine care (113913).
• Rickets. Oral calcium seems to reverse rickets caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Rickets is commonly caused be vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to rickets. Calcium supplementation can reverse rickets caused by calcium deficiency (94819). A small clinical study in children with nutritional rickets shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily for 24 weeks improves radiographically measured rickets caused by calcium deficiency. Rickets seems to improve more rapidly with calcium 1000 mg compared to calcium 500 mg. However, increasing the calcium dose to 2000 mg daily is not more beneficial than calcium 1000 mg daily (98904).
• Tooth retention. Oral calcium with vitamin D seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral calcium, via supplementation or as part of the diet, does not seem to be beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Although some studies disagree (15631,39041,95811,107237,113917), most population research suggests that increased calcium intake is not associated with overall breast cancer risk (15631,16715,98895,107236,107237,113917). However, one meta-analysis of observational studies shows that although higher total calcium intake is not associated with breast cancer risk, higher dietary calcium intake, specifically, may be associated with a slightly reduced risk (113917). Also, some analyses suggest that calcium intake may be associated with the risk for certain breast cancer sub-types. Some subgroup analyses suggest that calcium intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, adults (15631,107237) and that dietary calcium intake may reduce estrogen receptor(ER)-negative breast cancer, but not ER-positive breast cancer (107236). However, most research has not evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation or intake on breast cancer subtypes. The best evidence to date, from a large scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years after menopause does not reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer at the end of the study and 5 years after the end of the intervention (16715,98895).
• Fractures. Although oral calcium prevents fractures in osteoporosis, most evidence shows that calcium does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis discussion for more information on the use of calcium for this purpose. Details: Robust meta-analyses of mostly large, high-quality clinical studies show that calcium supplementation 500-1600 mg daily for 0.5-7 years with or without vitamin D does not reduce total fractures, hip fractures, vertebral fractures, or non-vertebral fractures in older adults without osteoporosis (95822,112486). A large-scale study in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years who were enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) suggests that calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D 400 IU daily for 7 years only modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) and does not significantly reduce fracture risk. This lack of effect may have been due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. In those who were 80% adherent, the combination of calcium plus vitamin D reduced the risk of hip fracture by about 29% (14282). Also, some clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 5 years does not attenuate loss of height after menopause when compared with placebo (95810). Additional meta-analyses of clinical and observational evidence suggest that calcium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, such as hip fractures (38589,38888,98895). Some other research has suggested that calcium in combination with vitamin D reduces fracture risk in older patients without osteoporosis (980,1836,8818,12930,12933,12952,38849,102145,107235); however, this research is confounded by a number of variables, including the presence of hormonal therapy and differing levels of fracture risk at baseline (1836,8818,95822). Conflicting findings on this topic might also be due to genetic differences in patient populations. A population analysis of the WHI study found that, in older females with the lowest genetic susceptibility to low BMD, taking calcium with vitamin D is associated with a reduction in fracture risk. However, in females with a higher genetic susceptibility to low BMD, there is no association between supplementation and fracture risk. This might be because individuals with a lower susceptibility to low BMD are also more responsive to calcium and vitamin D supplementation (97357). As of April 2018, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with vitamin D >400 IU daily along with calcium >1000 mg daily is safe and effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture. USPSTF recommends against supplementing with calcium 1000 mg daily or less along with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal females (95695).
• Obesity. Oral calcium does not seem to improve weight loss in adults or children with overweight or obesity. Details: Observational research has found that adults and children with low calcium intake are more likely to gain weight, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and be overweight or obese when compared to people with high calcium intake (12124,12125,12126,12127,14265). Additional observational research has found that increasing calcium intake is associated with weight loss in females; the results in males have been conflicting (12127,15602,15603). Despite these findings from observational research and a few small clinical studies (12128,15397,14438,98905,113918), most clinical research has found that increased calcium intake does not increase weight loss (12052,13138,15396,15399,38985,39004,97356). A meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies shows that daily dietary and supplemental calcium intake that meets the dietary reference intake (DRI) of 1000 mg or more daily does not increase weight loss in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when compared with intake below the DRI (95813). An older meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials also shows that increased dietary and supplemental calcium intake does not increase weight loss (15605).
• Overall mortality. Oral calcium does not seem to reduce overall mortality. Details: While some population research has found that calcium taken in combination with vitamin D in older females is associated with a lower risk of death (97353), most evidence shows that calcium, with or without vitamin D, has no effect on all-cause mortality (93533,97308,113584).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral calcium does not reduce the risk of developing CVD and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Clinical research shows that calcium does not decrease CVD risk. Several separate meta-analyses of clinical and population research involving over 50,000 patients show that taking calcium 600-1200 mg daily for up to 7 years does not reduce the risk of CVD-related outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or overall mortality (39018,91350,92994,93533,97308,98902,107231,107233). No association was found between total dietary or supplemental calcium intake with or without vitamin D and the risk of CVD or mortality (91350,93533,97308). In fact, some population and clinical research has found that when calcium is used alone or with vitamin D, there is an INCREASED risk of CVD and coronary heart disease (38077,107233). However, other clinical research disagrees (93533). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease by 1.1-1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Intravenous calcium does not prevent nerve pain in patients given oxaliplatin. Oral calcium has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: While pooled analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials suggest that calcium and magnesium infusion decreases the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials shows that the infusion has no effect in preventing neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). Additionally, clinical trials show that administering calcium gluconate 1 gram with magnesium sulfate 1 gram intravenously immediately before, or before and after, the administration of a single oxaliplatin cycle (90005), or over the entire 6-cycle course of oxaliplatin, does not improve symptoms of neurotoxicity when compared with placebo (96474).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral calcium does not prevent MI. When taken in the absence of vitamin D, oral calcium may increase the risk of MI. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of calcium is associated with a decreased risk of MI (91350). However, a 2010 meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking calcium at a dose of at least 500 mg daily is associated with an approximate 30% INCREASE in the risk of MI in patients over the age of 40. According to this analysis, one additional case of MI will occur for every 69 patients that take calcium for 5 years (17482). A more recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of MI by 1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research studied postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233) In contrast, other meta-analyses of clinical research have shown that taking calcium for up to 7 years is NOT associated with an increased risk of MI, including a meta-analysis that only included postmenopausal females (93533,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI in postmenopausal females (93533). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for alcohol use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 800 mg and vitamin D 200 IU orally daily for 14 days modestly reduces alcohol craving scores and withdrawal scores when compared with placebo in adults with alcohol dependence that are undergoing withdrawal. Taking calcium carbonate did not reduce the need for diazepam; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (107234).
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for atherosclerosis. Details: A population study has found that taking calcium 1.2 grams daily for 3 years has no effect on carotid intima thickness or carotid atherosclerosis incidence. A total calcium intake (dietary and supplemental) of at least 1794 mg daily in older females may be associated with a decreased risk of carotid atherosclerosis when compared with a total calcium intake below 1010 mg daily (97351).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the odds of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. Details: A small observational study found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a 52% reduced odds of an autism spectrum disorder in the offspring (98900).
• Brain tumor. It is unclear if dietary calcium intake is associated with risk of brain tumor. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 case-control studies has found that higher dietary calcium intake is associated with a lower odds of brain tumor when compared with lower dietary intake (113922). The validity of this finding is limited by the exploratory nature of the included studies, which analyzed all dietary ingredients for any potential associations.
• Cancer. Oral calcium alone does not seem to prevent cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Taking calcium alone does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of cancer (12118,15629). The role of calcium in cancer prevention when taken along with vitamin D is controversial, as conflicting results exist. One clinical trial shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1400-1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1100 IU daily have a 60% lower relative risk for developing cancer of any type. Approximately 25 postmenopausal females would need to take this combination for 4 years to prevent one occurrence of cancer (15629). However, a more recent clinical study shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of cancer at 4 years (93943). Reasons for the disparate results are not entirely clear. The discrepancies do not appear to be related to baseline vitamin D levels or different study populations. It is possible that, given the 10-year time lapse between the two publications, the discrepancies result from differences in cancer detection capability. Also, since cancer risk was a secondary outcome measure in the earlier study and a primary outcome measure in the more recent study, it is possible that the discrepancies result from differences in statistical methodologies. The effect of vitamin D and calcium on cancer risk in males and younger patients is not known. There is also interest in using calcium for reducing the risk of hematological malignancies. An analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU for up to 10 years is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of hematologic malignancies when compared with placebo. However, no effect on hematologic malignancy related mortality was seen (97354).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between a higher dietary intake of calcium and the risk of depression when compared with a lower dietary intake of calcium (96480).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if dietary calcium intake is associated with type 2 diabetes risk. Details: Some population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from the diet or supplements, alone or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713,96473,113929). One meta-analysis of cohort and cross-sectional studies found that the highest level of dietary calcium intake is associated with an 18% relative reduction in risk of type 2 diabetes when compared with the lowest level of intake. A dose-response analysis suggests that each 300, 600, and 1000 mg per day increase in dietary calcium intake is associated with a 7%, 14%, and 23% reduced risk of type 2 diabetes, respectively (113929). However, population research is often limited by confounding variables. For example, one analysis suggests that any beneficial effect might be influenced by concomitant magnesium intake (96473,113929), while another suggests that any benefit from increased intake may be more pronounced in females, adults aged 50 years or older, and Asian populations (113929). Furthermore, other population research has found that serum calcium levels higher than 9.6 mg/dL are associated with greater risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults with osteoporosis (95815).
• Dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for dyslipidemia. Details: One clinical study in adults with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia shows that adding calcium carbonate 400 mg three times daily to a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) for 6 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4% and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 4% when compared with the low-fat diet and placebo (2557). In contrast, a clinical study in females with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 800 mg daily for 2 years INCREASES total cholesterol levels and carotid intima-media thickness in postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, females when compared with placebo (97350). Calcium supplementation has also been evaluated in combination with vitamin D. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including adults with normolipidemia and dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily and vitamin D 200-7142 IU daily modestly improves HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplementation is most beneficial in patients with dyslipidemia at baseline (107227). The relationship between dietary calcium intake and serum lipid levels has also been evaluated in observational research. A meta-analysis of 7-11 observational studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with total cholesterol levels, although small differences in individual lipid parameters were identified. Additionally, a meta-analysis of 4-9 observational studies suggests that calcium intake is not associated with the risk of developing hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, or low HDL. A subgroup analysis found that higher calcium intake may be associated with lower triglyceride levels in Asian populations (113927). Overall, these findings are limited by significant heterogeneity and the cross-sectional nature of the included studies.
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing pain associated with dysmenorrhea. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg with vitamin D 5000 IU daily for three menstrual cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (95821). However, calcium carbonate 1000 mg taken alone seems to reduce pain when compared with placebo.
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but dietary calcium does not seem to have any effect (38893).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A very small clinical study in resistance-trained adults shows that taking calcium carbonate 500 mg 4 times daily for 3 weeks does not attenuate exercise-induced muscle damage from bench presses when compared with placebo (113933). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing falls. Details: Research suggests that calcium in combination with vitamin D, but not calcium alone, might prevent falls by decreasing body sway and normalizing systolic blood pressure (6362,11939,39038). Some experts think the combination of calcium and vitamin D may be important (11916). Preliminary clinical research in adults residing in a health care facility shows that taking vitamin D supplements while increasing dietary calcium and protein for 2 years reduces falls by 11% when compared with standard diets. Intervention diets were supplemented with milk, yogurt, and cheese to provide calcium 1142 mg and protein 69 grams daily (107235). There might also be different effects in females compared to males. In one study, females aged 65 years or older who took vitamin D 700 IU plus calcium citrate 500 mg daily over a 3-year period had a 46% lower risk of falling. However, this combination did not decrease falls in males (14291).
• Fluorosis. Oral calcium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking calcium orally, in combination with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and vitamin D, seems to be effective for reducing excessive fluoride levels in children and improving symptoms of fluorosis in children aged 6-12 years (990).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral calcium in combination with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing heart failure. Details: Based on a secondary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), taking calcium 1000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily does not reduce the risk of heart failure in the overall population or in individuals at high risk. However, in a subgroup of postmenopausal females without risk factors for heart failure, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of developing heart failure by about 37% (97307).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing blood levels of lead. Details: Lead is mobilized along with calcium from bone during pregnancy and lactation, resulting in increased serum concentrations of lead. One clinical study suggests that calcium supplementation does not significantly decrease these elevated lead concentrations (1586). However, another clinical study suggests that taking calcium reduces blood lead levels by 11% when compared with placebo, with greatest effects observed in those with high baseline levels of lead (38957).
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral calcium for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of calcium for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium alone or with vitamin D is beneficial for metabolic syndrome prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet and supplements alone, or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713).
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing nephrotic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium 500-1000 mg daily for 3 months in combination with vitamin D3 60,000 IU daily or weekly for 4 weeks has no effect on bone mineral density or the risk of relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (97355).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking calcium alone or with vitamin D3 1000 IU daily reduced the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but had no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma (104622).
• Oral mucositis. When used in combination with fluoride treatments, a calcium phosphate mouth rinse seems to prevent and reduce mucositis-related pain in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that using a particular mouth rinse (Caphosol, EUSA Pharma) containing calcium phosphate, in combination with fluoride treatments, reduces days of mucositis, the duration of pain, and the dose and days of morphine used when compared with placebo and fluoride treatment (38611).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: An older meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (38792). However, a more recent pooled analysis of 15 cohort and case-control studies has found that the highest intake of dietary or dairy calcium is associated with a 20% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared to the lowest intake (97349).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing postpartum depression risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium 2 grams daily beginning at 11-21 weeks gestation reduces depression at 12 weeks postpartum when compared with placebo. However, no benefit is seen at 6 weeks postpartum (39447).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing leg cramps during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking calcium 1 gram twice daily (as a mixture of salts) for 2 weeks can reduce pregnancy-related leg cramps during the second half of pregnancy when compared with no treatment (2567).
• Prematurity. It is unclear if supplemental calcium is beneficial for the growth and development of preterm infants. Details: A small clinical study in preterm infants consuming human milk shows that supplementation with calcium 45 mg/kg daily and phosphorus 25 mg/kg daily does not affect infant weight, length, head circumference, or risk of osteopenia after 6 weeks when compared with human milk alone (113924). However, the duration and size of this study may have been too limited to detect any difference between groups.
• Preterm labor. It is unclear if oral calcium reduces the risk of preterm labor. Details: A meta-analysis of 10 clinical studies shows that taking calcium supplements during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of preterm labor when compared with placebo (113909). A separate meta-analysis of 7 clinical studies conducted in China, which evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy, shows that this combination reduces the relative risk of preterm labor by 74% when compared with routine care (113913).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily might decrease the risk of developing prostate cancer (14133). However, some epidemiological research suggests that consuming very high doses of calcium, over 2000 mg daily, might actually increase the risk of developing prostate cancer (14134). Some epidemiological research also suggests that doses greater than 1500 mg daily increase the risk of poorly differentiated, clinically advanced, and fatal prostate cancer (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer (98894). However, contradictory research suggests that there is no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall risk of prostate cancer (14131,14132,104630).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Some population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke (4822,38678). However, other population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is not associated with a decreased risk of stroke (91350). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years does not affect the risk of stroke when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females, and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Vertigo. Oral calcium with vitamin D might reduce positional vertigo; the effect of calcium when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking calcium 500 mg and vitamin D 400 IU twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate calcium for these uses.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

EFFECTIVE

• Hypokalemia. Oral or intravenous potassium can treat and prevent hypokalemia. Details: Administering potassium orally or intravenously is effective for treating and preventing hypokalemia (15,107970). Oral potassium 20 mEq (780 mg of elemental potassium) is typically taken once daily to prevent hypokalemia (15,95010). Oral potassium 40-100 mEq (1560-3900 mg of elemental potassium) is typically taken in 2-5 divided doses daily to treat hypokalemia (95010). Doses should be limited to 40 mEq (1560 mg of elemental potassium), and the total dose should not exceed 200 mEq (7800 mg of elemental potassium) in 24 hours (95010). Potassium supplementation and route of administration should be individualized based on serum potassium level and patient status (15,107970).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Hypertension. Oral potassium, via dietary intake or supplementation, reduces blood pressure. Details: Population research has found that higher dietary potassium consumption is associated with a lower risk of developing hypertension (1310,8817,69512). Additionally, most clinical research shows that potassium, taken orally as part of the diet or as a supplement, reduces systolic blood pressure by about 3-9.5 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by about 2-6.4 mmHg in patients with or without hypertension (3385,92104,92106,95624,107974). In most of these studies, daily intake of potassium typically ranged from about 1500-7800 mg, with the most common intake being about 2340-2540 mg daily (92104,95624). However, some research shows that taking potassium does not lower systolic or diastolic blood pressure (69541,69550,107966). Differences in the patient populations, potassium intake, and salt intake could have contributed to the conflicting results. Potassium seems to be more effective for people with hypertension, low potassium levels, high daily sodium intake, and for Black adults (3384,3385,3386,92104,92106). Some research also shows that the greatest blood pressure-lowering effects of potassium occur at doses of about 3900-7800 mg daily (95624). A meta-analysis of clinical trials using a novel computational technique to assess both potassium intake and excretion suggests that the optimal blood pressure reduction occurs when taking about 1500 mg supplemental potassium daily or an overall intake of 4500-6500 mg potassium daily (105448). This analysis is limited by the heterogeneity and short duration of the included trials. There is also interest in utilizing low-sodium, high-potassium food substitutes to treat hypertension. Research shows that using salt substitutes containing 25% to 30% potassium chloride reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 3-4.6 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, when compared with regular table salt (107971,107976). In 2017, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) published guidelines recommending that patients with hypertension consume 3500-5000 mg of potassium daily (95680). This intake of potassium is expected to lower systolic blood pressure by about 4-5 mmHg in patients with hypertension and by about 2 mmHg in normotensive patients (3385). Although potassium supplements and dietary potassium both seem to be beneficial, the guidelines recommend getting potassium from dietary sources, since potassium-rich diets are usually heart-healthy (95680). Additionally, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). Oral prescription potassium citrate reduces the risk of kidney stone recurrence. It is unclear if non-prescription potassium citrate would be beneficial. Details: The American Urological Association (AUA) recommends potassium citrate therapy for patients with recurrent calcium stones and low urinary citrate, those with recurrent calcium or calcium oxalate stones without current metabolic abnormalities, and those with uric acid or cystine stones. The citrate component reduces urine calcium excretion and increases urine citrate and urine pH, which in turn alleviates crystal growth, formation, and aggregation. Sodium citrate may also be used to prevent stone recurrence; however, due to sodium's propensity to increase urine calcium excretion, potassium citrate remains the preferred salt formulation (107972). It is important to note that potassium citrate supplements are not equivalent to prescription potassium citrate products. Dose and duration of treatment is determined by a healthcare professional and individualized based on a patient's urinary citrate levels (107975,107989). Serum potassium levels should be monitored prior to starting potassium citrate, within 2 weeks of treatment initiation, and every 12 months (107975).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Eating foods high in potassium and low in sodium might reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. It is unclear if taking potassium supplements has the same benefit. Details: Large population studies in adults without prior CVD have found that higher dietary potassium intake is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events (109395,109399). One study found that daily potassium intake of about 3300 mg is associated with a 13% reduction in CVD risk when compared with intake of about 1920 mg (109399). The other study found that each additional 1000 mg of daily urinary potassium excretion, which is a marker of dietary intake, is associated with an 18% reduction in CVD risk (109395). Another observational study in over 15,000 adults with history of stroke or hypertension shows that replacing regular table salt with a substitute product containing 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride for an average of 5 years decreases the rate of stroke, major cardiovascular events, or death (107976). High quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this association. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).
• Stroke. Eating foods high in potassium and low in sodium might reduce the risk of stroke. It is unclear if taking potassium supplements has the same benefit. Details: Higher dietary intake of potassium seems to be associated with a lower risk of stroke. Population research has found that increasing dietary potassium intake by 1-1.5 grams daily is associated with up to a 20% reduced risk of stroke (92105,92107). Some population research has found that higher supplemental intake of potassium is associated with a 29% reduced risk of ischemic stroke. However, supplemental potassium intake is not found to be associated with a lower risk of hemorrhagic or total stroke (92107). An observational study in over 15,000 adults with history of stroke or hypertension shows that replacing regular table salt with a substitute product containing 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride for an average of 5 years decreases the rate of stroke, major cardiovascular events, or death (107976). High quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this association. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that foods containing at least 350 mg potassium and that are low in sodium, saturated fat, and cholesterol can state that "diets containing foods that are good sources of potassium and low in sodium may reduce the risk of high blood pressure and stroke" (1310,8817).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Dental hypersensitivity. It is unclear if topical potassium improves dental hypersensitivity. Details: One meta-analysis of clinical research shows that using a dentifrice containing 5% potassium nitrite reduces dentin sensitivity when compared with a dentifrice that does not contain potassium nitrite (69549). Other clinical research published in a systematic review shows that potassium-containing toothpastes might reduce dentin sensitivity more than controls that do not contain potassium. However, these toothpastes might be less effective than other active toothpastes, such as those containing sodium monofluorophosphate, and the effect may result from a placebo effect, since the mechanism of action of potassium is unclear (69456).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if increasing dietary potassium reduces the risk of diabetes. Details: A meta-analysis of 7 large population studies has found that consuming dietary potassium 3300-3500 mg daily is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of diabetes when compared with consumption below 1000 mg daily. Results were similar when studies that measured potassium intake with a dietary questionnaire were analyzed separately from those that measured intake based on urinary potassium excretion (110776). However, the validity of this finding is limited by the heterogeneity of the included studies. Furthermore, despite use of data from various databases, most studies included in the analysis were conducted by the same author.
• Impaired glucose tolerance (prediabetes). It is unclear if oral potassium improves glycemic control in prediabetes. Details: A small clinical study in Black patients with prediabetes shows that taking extended-release potassium (Klor-Con M10, Cardinal Health) 40 mEq daily as potassium chloride for 3 months does not improve glucose tolerance when compared with placebo. Although fasting glucose levels were slightly reduced in the potassium group when compared with placebo, both groups experienced a worsening of glucose intolerance, with no change in insulin levels or glycated hemoglobin (98533).
• Osteoporosis. Although there is interest in using oral potassium for osteoporosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of potassium for this condition.
• Physical performance. It is unclear if oral potassium improves physical performance in older adults. Details: Observational research in older adults has found that decreased dietary potassium intake and increased dietary sodium intake over 5 years is associated with worsened physical performance (105450).
• Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is unclear if oral potassium is beneficial in patients with SLE. Details: Observational research in patients with SLE has found that increased dietary potassium intake is not associated with improvements in disease activity scores or markers of cardiovascular disease, including lipid levels and blood pressure, when compared with low dietary potassium intake. However, higher potassium intake does seem to reduce the odds of having elevated levels of C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation, in these patients (109397). More evidence is needed to rate potassium for these uses.

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Cystic fibrosis. Long-term nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride improves lung function and reduces pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis show that, when taken along with a bronchodilator and other standard therapies, nebulized hypertonic sodium chloride in concentrations of 3% to 7%, up to 10 mL twice daily for 4 weeks, increases forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) when compared with isotonic saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) (26230,26230). This benefit was not seen at 48 weeks. Other clinical research in adults with cystic fibrosis shows that inhaling sodium chloride 7%, 4 mL twice daily for 48 weeks, does not improve FEV1 when compared with isotonic saline. However, chronic treatment with hypertonic saline does reduce the number of pulmonary exacerbations and increase the number of patients without pulmonary exacerbations when compared with isotonic saline (29402). It is not clear if this benefit occurs in children with cystic fibrosis. The Pulmonary Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends that individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 6 years or older use nebulized hypertonic saline long-term to improve lung function, reduce the number of exacerbations, and improve quality of life (29403).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity. Oral sodium chloride seems to prevent nephrotoxicity associated with use of amphotericin B. Details: Clinical research shows that administering oral or intravenous sodium chloride 150 mEq daily during treatment with amphotericin B can attenuate the rise in serum creatinine levels and preserve renal function when compared to treatment with amphotericin B alone (26226).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Bipolar disorder. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in preventing lithium level fluctuations in patients with bipolar disorder. Details: A moderate-sized open-label clinical study in adults with type I bipolar disorder receiving lithium carbonate shows that taking sodium chloride 1 gram daily for 12 weeks along with dietary salt restriction of 1 gram daily reduces the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L, but does not significantly affect serum sodium, potassium, aldosterone, or creatinine levels when compared with controls who were not salt restricted, but were advised not to consume additional salt at the table (112909). However, the interpretation of these findings is limited by missing data in both groups.
• Canker sores. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for canker sores, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Congestive heart failure. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial in patients with acute decompensated heart failure requiring decongestive therapy with diuretics. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure requiring high-dose intravenous furosemide shows that taking sodium chloride 2 grams three times daily for up to 96 hours does not affect patient weight or serum creatinine levels when compared with placebo (112911). However, the clinical relevance of this study is unclear and it may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Conjunctivitis. Although there is interest in using ophthalmic sodium chloride for conjunctivitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Hyponatremia. Although there is interest in using oral sodium chloride for hyponatremia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oral sodium chloride for this condition.
• Pharyngitis. Although there is interest in using topical sodium chloride for pharyngitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of sodium chloride for this condition.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if oral sodium is beneficial for premature infants. Details: Preliminary clinical research in infants born at less than 32 weeks' gestation shows that adding sodium 4 mEq/kg daily to enteral feedings, starting from the 7th day after birth and continuing through the 35th day, reduces the risk of developing hyponatremia and improves weight gain when compared with adding water (98180). A small, open-label clinical study in newborns less than 35 weeks gestation shows that high sodium intake, defined as an average of 0.25% sodium in maintenance fluids, for 48 hours on day 2 and 3 after birth results in less weight loss within the first 72 hours of life when compared with control, but does not improve mortality, length of hospital stay, or complications from prematurity (112908). However, interpretation of these findings is limited by varied concentrations of sodium as an intervention. More evidence is needed to rate sodium for these uses.

(Read more about SODIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when aloe gel is used topically and appropriately. Aloe gel-containing formulations have been safely applied in clinical trials (101,11982,12096,12098,12159,12160,12163,12164,17418)(90123,90124,90127,90128,90129,90131,97320,98816,103305). When included in topical cosmetics, the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel concluded that aloe-derived anthraquinone levels should not exceed 50 ppm (90122).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when aloe gel is used orally and appropriately, short-term. Aloe gel has been safely used in a dose of 15 mL daily for up to 42 days or 100 mL of a 50% solution twice daily for up to 4 weeks (11984,12164). Also, a specific aloe gel complex (Aloe QDM complex, Univera Inc.) has been safely used at a dose of approximately 600 mg daily for up to 8 weeks (90121). ...when aloe extract is used orally and appropriately, short-term. Aloe extract has been used with apparent safety in a dose of 500 mg daily for one month (101579). Also, an aloe extract enriched in aloe sterols has been used with apparent safety in a dose of 500 mg daily for 12 weeks (101577).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when aloe latex is used orally. There is some evidence that anthraquinones in aloe latex are carcinogenic or promote tumor growth, although data are conflicting (6138,16387,16388,91596,91597). In 2002, the US FDA banned the use of aloe latex in laxative products due to the lack of safety data (8229). ...when aloe whole-leaf extract is used orally. Aloe whole-leaf extract that has not been filtered over charcoal still contains anthraquinones. This type of aloe whole-leaf extract is referred to as being "nondecolorized". The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified this type of aloe whole-leaf extract as a possible human carcinogen (91598,91908). Although filtering aloe whole-leaf extract over charcoal removes the anthraquinones, some animal research suggests that this filtered extract, which is referred to as being "decolorized", may still cause gene mutations (91598). This suggests that constituents besides anthraquinones may be responsible for the carcinogenicity of aloe whole-leaf extract. It should be noted that commercial products that contain aloe whole-leaf extract may be labeled as containing "whole leaf Aloe vera juice" or "aloe juice" (91908).

LIKELY UNSAFE ...when aloe latex is used orally in high doses. Ingesting aloe latex 1 gram daily for several days can cause nephritis, acute kidney failure, and death (8,8961).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when aloe gel is used topically and appropriately. Aloe gel-containing formulations have been safely applied in clinical trials (90124,90131).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when aloe latex and aloe whole leaf extracts are used orally in children. Children younger than 12 years may experience abdominal pain, cramps, and diarrhea (4).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally. Anthraquinones present in aloe latex and aloe whole leaf extracts have irritant, cathartic, and possible mutagenic effects (4,16387,16388,90122). There are also anecdotal reports and evidence from animal research that anthraquinones or aloe whole leaf extracts might induce abortion and stimulate menstruation; avoid using (4,8,19,90122).

LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when aloe preparations are used orally. Cathartic and mutagenic anthraquinones present in aloe latex and aloe whole leaf extracts might pass into milk; avoid using (4,19).

(Read more about ALOE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (7555,12928,12946,95817). However, excessive doses should be avoided. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: Age 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51+ years, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stone, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Other clinical studies suggest that, when combined with vitamin D supplementation, calcium supplementation is not associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Other analyses report conflicting results and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day, to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484), and to combine calcium supplementation with vitamin D supplementation (93533).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. The National Academy of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51 years and older, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Other clinical studies suggest that, when combined with vitamin D supplementation, calcium supplementation is not associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Other analyses report conflicting results and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients to not consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day, to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484), and to combine calcium supplementation with vitamin D supplementation (93533).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (17506).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (945,1586,3263,3264,17506). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prescribing oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancy to those with low dietary calcium intake to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the same daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age independent of pregnancy status: 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg (17506). Doses over these amounts might increase the risk of neonatal hypocalcemia-induced seizures possibly caused by transient neonatal hypoparathyroidism in the setting of excessive calcium supplementation during pregnancy, especially during the third trimester. Neonatal hypocalcemia is a risk factor for neonatal seizures (97345).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in doses up to 100 mEq total potassium daily, not to exceed 200 mEq in a 24-hour period (95010,107989). Oral potassium chloride and potassium citrate are FDA-approved prescription products (95010,107989). Larger doses increase the risk of hyperkalemia (15). ...when administered intravenously (IV) at appropriate infusion rates (95011). Parenteral potassium is an FDA-approved prescription product (15,95011). A tolerable upper intake level (UL) for potassium has not been established; however, potassium levels should be monitored in individuals at increased risk for hyperkalemia, such as those with kidney disease, heart failure, and adrenal insufficiency (100310,107966).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in dietary amounts. A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for healthy individuals (6243,100310).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in dietary amounts of 40-80 mEq daily (15). A tolerable upper intake level (UL) has not been established for healthy individuals (100310).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher doses can be safely used therapeutically with appropriate medical monitoring (26226,26227).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid exceeding the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension and increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (26229,98176,98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,100310,109395,109396,109398,109399). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of sodium when used topically.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (26229,100310). Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in high doses. Tell patients to avoid prolonged use of doses exceeding the CDRR intake level of 1.2 grams daily for children 1 to 3 years, 1.5 grams daily for children 4 to 8 years, 1.8 grams daily for children 9 to 13 years, and 2.3 grams daily for adolescents (100310). Higher intake can cause hypertension (26229).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Sodium is safe in amounts that do not exceed the CDRR intake level of 2.3 grams daily (100310).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in higher doses. Higher intake can cause hypertension (100310). Also, both the highest and the lowest pre-pregnancy sodium quintile intakes are associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia, and the delivery of small for gestational age (SGA) infants when compared to the middle intake quintile (106264).

(Read more about SODIUM)

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, aloe gel might increase the risk of bleeding when taken with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.  Details In vitro research shows that aloe gel can inhibit platelet aggregation. This inhibition was greater than that seen with celecoxib, but less than that seen with aspirin (105501).

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Aloe might increase the risk of hypoglycemia when taken with antidiabetes drugs.  Details Preliminary clinical research suggests aloe gel might lower blood glucose levels (11983,12164,19756) and have additive effects when used with antidiabetes drugs. Monitor blood glucose levels closely.

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, aloe might decrease the levels and clinical effects of CYP1A2 substrates.  Details In vitro research shows that aloe extract induces CYP1A2 enzymes (111404).

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, aloe latex might increase the risk of adverse effects when taken with cardiac glycosides.  Details Overuse of aloe latex can increase the risk of adverse effects from cardiac glycoside drugs, such as digoxin, due to potassium depletion. Overuse of aloe, along with cardiac glycoside drugs, can increase the risk of toxicity (19).

DIURETIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, aloe latex might increase the risk of hypokalemia when taken with diuretic drugs.  Details Overuse of aloe latex might compound diuretic-induced potassium loss, increasing the risk of hypokalemia (19).

STIMULANT LAXATIVES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, aloe latex might increase the risk for fluid and electrolyte loss when taken with stimulant laxatives.  Details Due to cathartic laxative effects of aloe latex, concomitant use with other stimulant laxatives might compound fluid and electrolyte loss (19,19742,19743,19744).

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, aloe latex might increase the risk of bleeding when taken with warfarin.  Details Aloe latex has stimulant laxative effects. In some people aloe latex can cause diarrhea. Diarrhea can increase the effects of warfarin, increase international normalized ratio (INR), and increase the risk of bleeding. Advise patients who take warfarin not to take excessive amounts of aloe vera.

(Read more about ALOE)

ALUMINUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium citrate might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity. Other types of calcium do not increase aluminum absorption.  Details Calcium citrate can increase the absorption of aluminum when taken with aluminum hydroxide. The increase in aluminum levels may become toxic, particularly in individuals with kidney disease (21631). However, the effect of calcium citrate on aluminum absorption is due to the citrate anion rather than calcium cation. Calcium acetate does not appear to increase aluminum absorption (93006).

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.  Details Advise patients to take bisphosphonates at least 30 minutes before calcium, but preferably at a different time of day. Calcium supplements decrease absorption of bisphosphonates (12937).

CALCIPOTRIENE (Dovonex) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Taking calcipotriene with calcium might increase the risk for hypercalcemia.  Details Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (12938). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with calcium supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Intravenous calcium may decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers; oral calcium is unlikely to have this effect.  Details Intravenous calcium is used to decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers in the management of overdose. Intravenous calcium gluconate has been used before intravenous verapamil (Isoptin) to prevent or reduce the hypotensive effects without affecting the antiarrhythmic effects (6124). But there is no evidence that dietary or supplemental calcium when taken orally interacts with calcium channel blockers (12939,12947).

CEFTRIAXONE (Rocephin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Co-administration of intravenous calcium and ceftriaxone can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys.  Details Avoid administering intravenous calcium in any form, such as parenteral nutrition or Lactated Ringers, within 48 hours of intravenous ceftriaxone. Case reports in neonates show that administering intravenous ceftriaxone and calcium can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys. In several cases, neonates have died as a result of this interaction (15794,21632). So far there are no reports in adults; however, there is still concern that this interaction might occur in adults.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Using intravenous calcium with digoxin might increase the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias.  Details Hypercalcemia increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with digoxin (12940). However, one retrospective analysis of clinical data suggests that intravenous calcium does not increase the risk of dysrhythmias or mortality in patients receiving digoxin (38960).

DILTIAZEM (Cardizem, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, calcium might increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of diltiazem.

DOLUTEGRAVIR (Tivicay) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of dolutegravir.  Details Advise patients to take dolutegravir either 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium carbonate 1200 mg concomitantly with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces plasma levels of dolutegravir by almost 40%. Calcium appears to decrease levels of dolutegravir through chelation (93578).

ELVITEGRAVIR (Vitekta) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of elvitegravir.  Details Advise patients to take elvitegravir either 2 hours before or 2 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium along with elvitegravir can reduce blood levels of elvitegravir through chelation (94166).

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption and effectiveness of levothyroxine.  Details Advise patients to take levothyroxine and calcium supplements at least 4 hours apart. Calcium reduces levothyroxine absorption, probably by forming insoluble complexes (5082). Calcium carbonate supplements reduce effectiveness of levothyroxine in patients with hypothyroidism (5081,5082,6137).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use of calcium and lithium may increase this risk of hypercalcemia.  Details Clinical research suggests that long-term use of lithium may cause hypercalcemia in 10% to 60% of patients (38953). Theoretically, concomitant use of lithium and calcium supplements may further increase this risk.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of quinolone antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral quinolones at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements or calcium-fortified foods. Taking calcium at the same time as oral quinolones can reduce quinolone absorption. Calcium binds to quinolones in the gut (4412,10339,21638,38570).

RALTEGRAVIR (Isentress) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium may reduce levels of raltegravir.  Details Pharmacokinetic research shows that taking a single dose of calcium carbonate 3000 mg along with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily modestly decreases the mean area under the curve of raltegravir, but the decrease does not necessitate a dose adjustment of raltegravir (94164). However, a case of elevated HIV-1 RNA levels and documented resistance to raltegravir has been reported for a patient taking calcium carbonate 1 gram three times daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU three times daily in combination with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 11 months. It is thought that calcium reduced raltegravir levels by chelation, leading to treatment failure (94165).

SOTALOL (Betapace) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of sotalol.  Details Advise patients to separate doses by at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium. Calcium appears to reduce the absorption of sotalol, probably by forming insoluble complexes (10018).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral tetracyclines at least 2 hours before, or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements. Taking calcium at the same time as oral tetracyclines can reduce tetracycline absorption. Calcium binds to tetracyclines in the gut (1843).

THIAZIDE DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Taking calcium along with thiazides might increase the risk of hypercalcemia and renal failure.  Details Thiazides reduce calcium excretion by the kidneys (1902). Using thiazides along with moderately large amounts of calcium carbonate increases the risk of milk-alkali syndrome (hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis, renal failure). Patients may need to have their serum calcium levels and/or parathyroid function monitored regularly.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, use of calcium supplements may increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of verapamil.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

ACE INHIBITORS (ACEIs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Using ACEIs with high doses of potassium increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details ACEIs block the actions of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and reduce potassium excretion (95628). Concomitant use of these drugs with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15,23207). However, concomitant use of these drugs with moderate dietary potassium intake (about 3775-5200 mg daily) does not increase serum potassium levels (95628).

ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKERS (ARBs) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Using ARBs with high doses of potassium increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details ARBs block the actions of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and reduce potassium excretion (95628). Concomitant use of these drugs with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15,23207). However, concomitant use of these drugs with moderate dietary potassium intake (about 3775-5200 mg daily) does not increase serum potassium levels (95628).

POTASSIUM-SPARING DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = C Concomitant use increases the risk of hyperkalemia.  Details Using potassium-sparing diuretics with potassium supplements increases the risk of hyperkalemia (15).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = A Theoretically, a high intake of dietary sodium might reduce the effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs.  Details High intake of dietary sodium can increase systolic and diastolic blood pressure (26222). Also, high intake of sodium may necessitate increased use of antihypertensive medications to achieve blood pressure control in some patients, such as those with chronic kidney disease (26223).

CORTICOSTEROIDS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids with sodium supplements might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Mineralocorticoids and some glucocorticoids (corticosteroids) cause sodium retention. This effect is dose-related and depends on mineralocorticoid potency. It is most common with hydrocortisone, cortisone, and fludrocortisone, followed by prednisone and prednisolone (4425).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Altering dietary intake of sodium might alter the levels and clinical effects of lithium.  Details High sodium intake can reduce plasma concentrations of lithium by increasing lithium excretion (26225). Reducing sodium intake can significantly increase plasma concentrations of lithium and cause lithium toxicity in patients being treated with lithium carbonate (26224,26225). Stabilizing sodium intake is shown to reduce the percentage of patients with lithium level fluctuations above 0.8 mEq/L (112909). Patients taking lithium should avoid significant alterations in their dietary intake of sodium.

SODIUM-CONTAINING DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Concomitant use of sodium-containing drugs with additional sodium from dietary or supplemental sources may increase the risk of hypernatremia and long-term sodium-related complications.  Details The Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level of 2.3 grams of sodium daily indicates the intake at which it is believed that chronic disease risk increases for the apparently healthy population (100310). Some medications contain high quantities of sodium. When used in conjunction with sodium supplements or high-sodium diets, the CDRR may be exceeded. Additionally, concomitant use may increase the risk for hypernatremia; this risk is highest in the elderly and people with other risk factors for electrolyte disturbances.

TOLVAPTAN (Samsca) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Theoretically, concomitant use of tolvaptan with sodium might increase the risk of hypernatremia.  Details Tolvaptan is a vasopressin receptor 2 antagonist that is used to increase sodium levels in patients with hyponatremia (29406). Patients taking tolvaptan should use caution with the use of sodium salts such as sodium chloride.

(Read more about SODIUM)

General ...Orally and topically, aloe products are generally well tolerated when used in typical doses. However, oral aloe latex is associated with a greater risk of adverse effects, especially when used in high doses or long-term.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Aloe latex may cause abdominal pain, cramps, and diarrhea.
Topically: Burning, erythema, and itching. Contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Aloe latex is associated with serious adverse effects when taken in high doses or long-term. Cases of acute hepatitis due to a hypersensitivity reaction to aloe leaf extract has been reported.

Dermatologic ...Topically, aloe gel has occasionally been associated with burning (12164,19741,30697,30706), itching (12164,19741,30697), eczema (90122), erythema (19748,30706,90123), contact dermatitis (12163,12164,30695,30736,30737,30738,30740), popular eruption (30732), and urticaria (30712). Also, a case of generalized nummular and popular dermatitis attributed to hypersensitivity has been reported for a 47-year-old male who used aloe leaf gel, both topically and orally, for 4 years (30740).

Endocrine ...A case of severe hypokalemia has been reported for a male breast cancer patient who was undergoing chemotherapy and using aloe vera 1 liter daily orally for 2 weeks. The hypokalemia was attributed to the cathartic effects of aloe and resolved once aloe use was discontinued (30704).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, aloe latex can cause abdominal pain and cramps. Long-term use or abuse of aloe latex can cause diarrhea, sometimes with hypokalemia, albuminuria, hematuria, muscle weakness, weight loss, arrhythmia, and pseudomelanosis coli (pigment spots in intestinal mucosa). Pseudomelanosis coli is believed to be harmless, and usually reverses with discontinuation of aloe. It is not directly associated with an increased risk of developing colorectal adenoma or carcinoma (6138). Orally, aloe gel may cause nausea, stomach cramps, and other gastrointestinal complaints in some patients (104174,111921,111663).
Topically, applying aloe gel in the mouth may cause nausea within 5 minutes of application in some patients (90124).

Hematologic ...A case of Henoch-Schonlein purpura, characterized by abdominal pain, purpura, and severe arthralgia, has been reported in a 52-year-old male who drank aloe juice prepared from four to five leaflets for 10 days prior to symptom development (91598).

Hepatic ...Cases of acute hepatitis have been reported after ingestion of aloe leaf extracts for between 3 weeks and 5 years. This is thought to be a hypersensitivity reaction (15567,15569,16386,17419,90126,91598). A case of acute hepatitis has also been reported for a 45-year-old female who drank two ounces of Euforia juice (Nuverus International), a product containing green tea, noni, goji, and aloe, daily for one month (90125). However, one small clinical trial in healthy individuals shows that taking aloe gel 2 ounces twice daily for 60 days does not impair liver function (104174).

Renal ...Orally, aloe latex can cause hemorrhagic gastritis, nephritis, and acute kidney failure following prolonged use of high doses (1 gram daily or more) (8961).

(Read more about ALOE)

General ...Orally and intravenously, calcium is well-tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Belching, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, and stomach upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about calciphylaxis and kidney stones.

Cardiovascular ...There has been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these results, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and CVD, CHD, or MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482). To minimize the possible risk of CVD, CHD, or MI, advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). While dietary intake of calcium is preferred over supplemental intake, advise patients who require calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D, as this combination does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI (93533).
Rarely, calcium intake can increase the risk of calciphylaxis, which usually occurs in patients with kidney failure. Calciphylaxis is the deposition of calcium phosphate in arterioles, which causes skin ulcers and skin necrosis. In a case report, a 64-year-old female with a history of neck fracture, sepsis, and ischemic colitis presented with painful leg ulcers due to calciphylaxis. She discontinued calcium and vitamin D supplementation and was treated with sodium thiosulfate and supportive care (95816).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, calcium can cause belching, flatulence, nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, and diarrhea (1824,1843,12950,38803). Although constipation is frequently cited as an adverse effect of calcium, there is no scientific substantiation of this side effect (1824,1843,1844,1845,12950,38978). Calcium carbonate has been reported to cause acid rebound, but this is controversial (12935,12936).

Oncologic ...There is some concern that very high doses of calcium might increase the risk of prostate cancer. Some epidemiological evidence suggests that consuming over 2000 mg/day of dietary calcium might increase the risk for prostate cancer (4825,12949). Additional research suggests that calcium intake over 1500 mg/day might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer and prostate cancer mortality (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a small increase in prostate cancer risk (98894). However, contradictory research suggests no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall prostate cancer risk (14131,14132,104630). More evidence is needed to determine the effect of calcium, if any, on prostate cancer risk.

Renal ...Kidney stones have been reported in individuals taking calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily in combination with vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 4 years (93943).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

General ...Orally or intravenously, potassium is generally well-tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, belching, diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, and vomiting.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
All ROAs: High potassium levels can cause arrhythmia, heart block, hypotension, and mental confusion.

Cardiovascular ...Orally or intravenously, high potassium levels can cause hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, heart block, or cardiac arrest (15,16,3385,95011,95626,95630).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally or intravenously, high doses of potassium can cause, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and flatulence (95010,95011). Bleeding duodenal ulcers have also been associated with ingestion of slow-release potassium tablets (69625,69672).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally or intravenously, high potassium levels can cause paresthesia, generalized weakness, flaccid paralysis, listlessness, vertigo, or mental confusion (15,16,3385,95011).

(Read more about POTASSIUM)

General ...Orally, sodium is well tolerated when used in moderation at intakes up to the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake level. Topically, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Worsened cardiovascular disease, hypertension, kidney disease.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, intake of sodium above the CDRR intake level can exacerbate hypertension and hypertension-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) (26229,98176,100310,106263). A meta-analysis of observational research has found a linear association between increased sodium intake and increased hypertension risk (109398). Observational research has also found an association between increased sodium salt intake and increased risk of CVD, mortality, and cardiovascular mortality (98177,98178,98181,98183,98184,109395,109396,109399). However, the existing research is unable to confirm a causal relationship between sodium intake and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; high-quality, prospective research is needed to clarify this relationship (100312). As there is no known benefit with increased salt intake that would outweigh the potential increased risk of CVD, advise patients to limit salt intake to no more than the CDRR intake level (100310).
A reduction in sodium intake can lower systolic blood pressure by a small amount in most individuals, and diastolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension (100310,100311,106261). However, post hoc analysis of a small crossover clinical study in White patients suggests that 24-hour blood pressure variability is not affected by high-salt intake compared with low-salt intake (112910). Additionally, the available research is insufficient to confirm that a further reduction in sodium intake below the CDRR intake level will lower the risk for chronic disease (100310,100311). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that reducing sodium intake increases levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides, but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, by a small amount (106261).
It is unclear whether there are safety concerns when sodium is consumed in amounts lower than the adequate intake (AI) levels. Some observational research has found that the lowest levels of sodium intake might be associated with increased risk of death and cardiovascular events (98181,98183). However, this finding has been criticized because some of the studies used inaccurate measures of sodium intake, such as the Kawasaki formula (98177,98178,101259). Some observational research has found that sodium intake based on a single 24-hour urinary measurement is inversely correlated with all-cause mortality (106260). The National Academies Consensus Study Report states that there is insufficient evidence from observational studies to conclude that there are harmful effects from low sodium intake (100310).

Endocrine ...Orally, a meta-analysis of observational research has found that higher sodium intake is associated with an average increase in body mass index (BMI) of 1. 24 kg/m2 and an approximate 5 cm increase in waist circumference (98182). It has been hypothesized that the increase in BMI is related to an increased thirst, resulting in an increased intake of sugary beverages and/or consumption of foods that are high in salt and also high in fat and energy (98182). One large observational study has found that the highest sodium intake is not associated with overweight or obesity when compared to the lowest intake in adolescents aged 12-19 years when intake of energy and sugar-sweetened beverages are considered (106265). However, in children aged 6-11 years, usual sodium intake is positively associated with increased weight and central obesity independently of the intake of energy and/or sugar-sweetened beverages (106265).

Gastrointestinal ...In one case report, severe gastritis and a deep antral ulcer occurred in a patient who consumed 16 grams of sodium chloride in one sitting (25759). Chronic use of high to moderately high amounts of sodium chloride has been associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer (29405).

Musculoskeletal ...Observational research has found that low sodium levels can increase the risk for osteoporosis. One study has found that low plasma sodium levels are associated with an increased risk for osteoporosis. Low levels, which are typically caused by certain disease states or chronic medications, are associated with a more than 2-fold increased odds for osteoporosis and bone fractures (101260).
Conversely, in healthy males on forced bed rest, a high intake of sodium chloride (7.7 mEq/kg daily) seems to exacerbate disuse-induced bone and muscle loss (25760,25761).

Oncologic ...Population research has found that high or moderately high intake of sodium chloride is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer when compared with low sodium chloride intake (29405). Other population research in patients with gastric cancer has found that a high intake of sodium is associated with an approximate 65% increased risk of gastric cancer mortality when compared with a low intake. When zinc intake is taken into consideration, the increased risk of mortality only occurred in those with low zinc intake, but the risk was increased to approximately 2-fold in this sub-population (109400).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...In patients with hypertension, population research has found that sodium excretion is modestly and positively associated with having moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea. This association was not found in normotensive patients (106262).

Renal ...Increased sodium intake has been associated with impaired kidney function in healthy adults. This effect seems to be independent of blood pressure. Observational research has found that a high salt intake over approximately 5 years is associated with a 29% increased risk of developing impaired kidney function when compared with a lower salt intake. In this study, high salt intake was about 2-fold higher than low salt intake (101261).

(Read more about SODIUM)