7-Day Ultimate Cleanse - Multi-Fiber Colon Cleanse by Nature's Secret

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Diabetes. Although there has been interest in using oral alfalfa for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alfalfa for this purpose.
• Dyspepsia. Although there has been interest in using oral alfalfa for dyspepsia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alfalfa for this purpose.
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral alfalfa seeds are beneficial in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Details: A small, uncontrolled clinical study in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking heat-prepared alfalfa seeds 40 grams three times daily for 8 weeks reduces total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels when compared to baseline (5816). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group.
• Menopausal symptoms. Although there has been interest in using oral alfalfa for menopausal symptoms, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of alfalfa for this purpose. There is insufficient reliable information available about the effectiveness of alfalfa for its other uses.

(Read more about ALFALFA)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alzheimer disease. It is unclear if apple juice consumption is beneficial in patients with Alzheimer disease. Details: A small clinical study in adults with moderate to severe Alzheimer disease shows that drinking 4 ounces of apple juice twice daily for one month does not improve cognitive function when compared with baseline. However, according to caregiver assessment, it seems to improve aspects of mood and behavior, such as anxiety, depression, apathy, delusion, and agitation, when compared with baseline (94422). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Cancer. It is unclear if apple consumption is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Some population research has found that eating one or more apples daily may be associated with a decreased risk of esophageal, colorectal, larynx, or breast cancer when compared with eating less than 1 apple daily (31688). Also, a case-control study in adults with lung cancer has found that increased apple consumption may be associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer (3470).
• Dental plaque. It is unclear if apple consumption is beneficial for reducing dental plaque. Details: A small clinical study in healthy patients shows that eating an apple is less effective for reducing plaque than brushing teeth. Eating an apple actually increases plaque when compared with baseline, although it decreases the measure of bacterial vitality (99447).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if consumption of powdered, dehydrated apple is beneficial in patients with type 2 diabetes. Details: A small clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that substituting 26-52 grams of white wheat flour in bread with powdered, dehydrated apple and consuming the bread daily for up to 4 weeks does not improve fasting blood glucose or postprandial glucose levels when compared with a low-fiber white bread control (13141).
• Diarrhea. It is unclear if apple juice consumption is beneficial in infants with severe diarrhea. Details: A clinical study in infants with severe diarrhea shows that drinking apple juice 15 mL/kg twice daily during episodes of diarrhea results in more fecal loss when compared with drinking water (31687).
• Metabolic syndrome. Although there has been interest in using apple for metabolic syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of apple for this purpose.
• Muscle strength. Oral apple extract has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effects when used alone is unclear. Details: Small clinical studies in resistance trained males show that taking a specific blend of ancient peat and apple extract (elevATP, VDF FutureCeuticals Inc.) 150 mg daily as a liquid with liposomes (QuSomes, BioZone Laboratories Inc.) for 12 weeks modestly increases lower body and total strength, improves lower body power output, and increases cross-sectional area of muscle when compared with placebo (94418,94419).
• Obesity. It is unclear if apple consumption is beneficial in patients with overweight or obesity. Details: A small clinical study in females with hypercholesterolemia and overweight or obesity shows that eating apples three times daily for 12 weeks is associated with weight loss of 1.2 kg, compared with weight loss of 0.9 kg in those consuming oat cookies (17997). More evidence is needed to rate apple for these uses.

(Read more about APPLE)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Coronary heart disease (CHD). Consuming barley 3-3.6 grams daily as a source of dietary fiber appears to reduce the risk of CHD. Details: Clinical research shows that a diet containing foods high in soluble fiber, such as whole grain barley or dry milled barley, reduces the risk of heart disease (2737,4962,4963,4964,4965,4966,4967,4968). In 1993, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a health claim stating that consuming at least 3 grams of soluble fiber per day, as part of a diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol, may reduce the risk of CHD (5792,5797,102336). However, some clinical research shows that at least 3.6 grams of soluble fiber daily is needed to reduce the risk of CHD (5788,5795).
• Hypercholesterolemia. Consuming barley 3-12 grams daily seems to reduce total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in adults with hypercholesterolemia. Details: Clinical research shows that taking barley significantly reduces total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when used with a normal diet or added to the National Cholesterol Education Program's Step I diet (11134,11986,17129,33734,33748,33752). A meta-analysis of 11 clinical trials shows that consuming preparations containing barley 3-12 grams daily for at least 4-12 weeks reduces total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels by around 12 mg/dL and 10 mg/dL, respectively, with no change in triglyceride or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. These changes did not appear to be dose-dependent (17129). However, a small clinical study in males with hypercholesterolemia shows that the effect of barley on cholesterol is modestly dose-dependent. Taking 0.4 grams, 3 grams, or 6 grams of soluble fiber from barley daily for 5 weeks reduces total cholesterol by 14%, 17%, and 20%, respectively, and reduces LDL cholesterol by 17%, 17%, and 24%, respectively, when compared to baseline (11986). The form of barley used may alter its effect on cholesterol levels. Some research has shown that barley highly enriched (75% by weight) with beta-glucans does not seem to significantly affect cholesterol. This lack of effect seems to be the result of processing the barley into a highly enriched beta-glucans product (10166). Food processing seems to affect beta-glucans structure or solubility and therefore decreases the cholesterol lowering effects of barley.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Increased consumption of barley as a source of fiber does not appear to be beneficial for primary or secondary prevention of colorectal cancer. Details: Clinical and observational research shows that consuming dietary cereal fiber, including barley fiber, does not reduce the risk of colorectal cancer or prevent colorectal cancer recurrence (160,4819,4820,4821,5104).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear if oral barley is beneficial in patients with COVID-19. Details: A small clinical study in Iranian adults hospitalized with moderate COVID-19 shows that drinking 250 mL of Persian barley water daily for 2 weeks, along with conventional treatment, decreases length of hospital stay, body temperature, and markers of inflammation when compared with conventional treatment alone. However, Persian barley water does not appear to improve oxygen saturation or symptoms of COVID-19 (111148). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of placebo control and concerns related to the statistical methods used.
• Diabetes. Although there has been interest in using oral barley for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of barley for this purpose.
• Diarrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral barley for diarrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of barley for this purpose.
• Gastric cancer. It is unclear if oral barley is effective for the prevention of gastric cancer. Details: Observational research suggests that increased consumption of dietary fiber, a component of barley, is associated with 70% lower odds of gastric cancer when compared with low consumption of dietary fiber (10435).
• Gastritis. Although there has been interest in using oral barley for gastritis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of barley for this purpose.
• Hypertension. Although there has been interest in using oral barley for hypertension, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of barley for this purpose.
• Obesity. Although there has been interest in using oral barley for obesity, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of barley for this purpose.
• Ulcerative colitis. Small clinical studies suggest that oral barley might improve symptoms associated with ulcerative colitis. Details: Several small, open-label trials in patients with ulcerative colitis show that consuming food containing germinated barley 20-30 grams daily for 4-24 weeks reduces symptoms of ulcerative colitis when compared to baseline (33725,33729,33732,33777). However, the validity of these findings is limited by a lack of comparator groups. Barley has also been studied in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical study in adults with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis shows that taking a specific nutritional supplement (Profermin, Nordisk Rebalance) containing barley malt flour, oat flour, Lactobacillus plantarum, and lecithin twice daily for 8 weeks decreases symptom scores by at least 50% in an additional 26% of patients when compared with a control nutritional supplement. Disease remission occurred in 31% of patients taking this product compared with 15% of patients in the control group (92818). It is unclear if these findings are due to barley, other ingredients, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate barley for these uses.

(Read more about BARLEY)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Athletic performance. Oral beet may improve athletic performance associated with aerobic activities. However, it is not clear who is most likely to benefit, for which type of competition it is most useful, or what dose or duration of use is most appropriate. Details: Several small clinical trials, most of which enrolled elite athletes, recreational athletes, and sedentary males, as well as meta-analyses of some of these and other studies, show that beet improves various measures of athletic performance, including ability, muscular endurance, power output, sprinting, and strength (93844,94464,94468,94469,100143,100150,100152,105761,113422). Clinical research also shows that drinking beetroot juice improves the use of oxygen during exercise testing in recreationally-trained athletes, especially with severe exercise testing (94460,94463,94467,100147,105762). Also, in obese adolescents, taking beetroot juice daily for 6 days increases the time to exhaustion from severe exercise, but does not improve moderate exercise (100145). Not all research shows that beet supplementation benefits athletic performance. Another meta-analysis of several small clinical studies, including some of the studies above, shows that taking beetroot does not improve performance in high-intensity or sprint interval training (111159). Additionally, the majority of research in elite athletes does not support the use of beetroot juice to decrease the time needed to complete a task, aid in some sort of graded exercise test, or improve the use of oxygen during exercise testing (94455,94458,94460,94461,94464,94465,94466,94469,94473,100142,100153,105763). The supposed lack of effect of beetroot juice in elite athletes might be related to the natural production of nitrates and nitrites in the body or the increased ability to use oxygen that comes from extensive training (94458,94463). Alternatively, any changes might be very small (<1%) and not identified with statistical comparisons, although even very small changes might be beneficial in competition (94464). The most commonly used doses in all studies, regardless of effect, have included an acute dose of beetroot juice 70-500 mL up to 3 hours prior to exercise (93844,94463,94464,94466,94467,94473,97726,100142,100143,105761)(105762,111159,113422) or chronic dosing of up to 500 mL daily for 3-6 days (94459,94464,94469,100145,100147,100153,111159,113422). Less commonly, beetroot juice 70-140 mL daily, betalain-rich concentrate 100 mg daily, or a beetroot-based nutritional gel 100 grams daily, have been taken for longer dosing schedules of 7-15 days (97720,100144,100148,100152,105763,113422). Benefits in elite athletes, most often related to time trials, are usually limited to studies using chronic dosing of 7-15 days, which is longer than the duration of 6 days used in the majority of studies (94473,97720,100144,100148). Brands of juice used in clinical trials have included Beet It Sport (James White Drinks Ltd.) (94455,94458,94465,100142,100143,100144,100148,105761,105763), Beet It Stamina Shot (James White Drinks Ltd.) (93844), Beet It (James White Drinks Ltd) (94457,94459,94460,94467,94469,97726,100145,100153,105762,111159), and Love Beets Beetroot Juice (Gs Fresh Ltd.) (94461,94462). Although plasma levels have not been analyzed in all studies, the majority of studies suggest that these doses are adequate to increase levels of nitrates or nitrites, which is thought to be essential for increasing athletic potential (93844,94455,94458,94459,94460,94465,94467,94469,94466,94473,97726). The evidence also suggests benefit in both normoxic and hypoxic environments (94465,100148,105763).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Drinking beetroot juice 7-8 times over 48 hours after strenuous exercise may reduce exercise-induced muscle soreness, but evidence is conflicting. Details: Some clinical research shows drinking beetroot juice (Love Beets Beetroot Juice, Gs Fresh Ltd.) 125 mL or 250 mL seven times over 48 hours after strenuous box jumps improves muscle soreness when compared with placebo and sodium nitrite (96964,97722). Other small clinical studies show that drinking beetroot juice 50-250 mL as eight separate doses over 48 hours after strenuous exerciseimproves muscle soreness and reduces tissue edema when compared with placebo (94461,113424). However, drinking beetroot juice 250 mL as seven separate doses over 48 hours after running a marathon does not appear to reduce muscle soreness when compared with placebo (94462). A meta-analysis of 4 small studies, mostly in healthy or physically active males, shows that drinking beetroot juice improves the pressure pain threshold, which is a measure of muscle soreness, at 48- and 72-hours post-exercise when compared with a fruit-flavored drink. However, beetroot juice does not improve subjective muscle soreness scores (111160). The validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the beetroot juice regimens among the included studies. Further, these results should not be generalized to elite athletes.

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Drinking beetroot juice for up to 14 days may not improve exercise capacity in patients with COPD. Details: A meta-analysis of eight small clinical trials in patients with COPD shows that taking nitrate-rich beetroot juice does not improve most measures of exercise capacity, including the 6-minute walk test, cycling ergometry endurance time, and maximum rate of oxygen consumption (VO2 max), when compared with placebo. Additionally, beetroot juice did not reduce blood pressure or heart rate. However, the analysis did show a significant improvement in scores on the Borg Rating of Perceived Exhaustion scale with beetroot juice over placebo. Nitrate-rich beetroot juice doses ranged from 70-140 mL daily for up to 14 days (104200).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Cognitive function. It is unclear if drinking beetroot juice is beneficial for cognitive function. Details: A small clinical study in adults with overweight or obesity on a calorie-restricted diet shows that drinking 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice daily for 14 days improves the time to complete part B of the trail making test, which is a test of cognitive function, but not part A, when compared with controls (111158). However, the duration and size of this study limits its validity. Further, it is unclear whether any improvement is clinically significant. The effect of acute beet administration on cognitive function has also been studied. A very small clinical study in healthy adults shows that taking beet extract (RedNite, Enovate Biolife) chewable tablets 3 grams 90 minutes prior to neuropsychological testing improves immediate and delayed memory capacity, frontal lobe function, and lexical flexibility but does not improve working memory, information processing speed, or subjective reports of memory performance when compared with placebo (113427).
• Coronary heart disease (CHD). It is unclear if oral beetroot extract is beneficial in patients with CHD. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with CHD shows that taking red beetroot extract 500 mg, containing around 25 mg betalains, twice daily for 2 weeks reduces total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 15 mg/dL and reduces triglycerides by 8 mg/dL when compared to baseline. Slight improvements in blood pressure and blood glucose were also reported, but these changes were not clinically significant (103883). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Also, it is unclear whether beetroot can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with CHD.
• Dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral beetroot is beneficial in patients with dyslipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of small clinical studies in healthy individuals or patients with dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease, or overweight or obesity, shows that consuming beetroot juice or leaves does not improve levels of triglycerides or total, low-density lipoprotein, or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol when compared with controls (111163). However, the validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the enrolled patients and beetroot regimens.
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice improves recovery from muscle damage after exercise. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 small clinical studies in healthy or physically active individuals, most of which enrolled males only, shows that drinking beetroot juice improves measures of muscle recovery at 72 hours post-exercise when compared with a fruit-flavored drink. However, beetroot juice does not consistently improve recovery at earlier time points post-exercise, nor does it reduce levels of creatine kinase or markers of inflammation (i.e., interleukin-6, interleukin-8, c-reactive protein, or tumor necrosis factor-alpha) (111160). However, the validity of the findings from this meta-analysis is limited by the heterogeneity of the beetroot juice regimens among the included studies, which usually varied from 210-250 mg of nitrate in 7-11 servings over 3-7 days. Further, these results should not be generalized to elite athletes. Another very small clinical study in semi-professional female athletes shows that ingesting beetroot juice 50 mL 8 times over 48 hours after exercise-induced muscle damage enhances the recovery of some functional parameters such as muscle endurance but not others such as flexibility and vertical jump performance when compared with placebo (113424).
• Hypertension. Oral beet may slightly reduce blood pressure in healthy individuals, but it is unclear if it is beneficial in patients with hypertension. Details: Meta-analyses of small studies show the potential for a minor reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in healthy adults taking beetroot juice (94470,97718,97728). The average reduction in SBP and DBP with beetroot juice consumption is about 4 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, which is greater than the effect seen with consuming blackcurrant juice or nitrate-depleted beetroot juice. The most benefit is seen when beetroot juice is taken for at least 2 weeks or at doses of 500 mL daily (97728). The effect of acute beet supplementation on blood pressure is conflicting. A small clinical study in healthy adults shows that drinking beet juice (Beet It, James White Company) 140 mL two hours prior to cardiovascular measurements reduces resting SBP by about 4 mmHg but does not improve resting or post-exercise DBP, central blood pressure, or arterial stiffness nor does it improve post-exercise SBP when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis suggests that the reductions in resting SBP were only observed in males, not females (113423). Another small clinical study shows that consuming beet 100 grams baked into bread modestly decreases DBP over a 6-hour period when compared with white bread (97725). It is possible that genetics might play a role in the magnitude of effect seen with beetroot consumption. Adults with a specific gene polymorphism, eNOS Glu298Asp, experienced a greater reduction in DBP after consuming beet-containing bread (97724). Despite positive findings in studies of healthy individuals, research on the use of beetroot juice in patients with hypertension is unclear. A small clinical study in adults with hypertension who were taking antihypertensive medications shows that drinking nitrate-rich beetroot juice (Beet it; James White Drinks Ltd.) 70 mL twice daily for one week does not lower blood pressure when compared with nitrate-depleted beetroot juice (94457). Also, in patients with mild to moderate hypertension, clinical research shows that taking a combination of beetroot powder (Sensient) 300 mg, olive leaf extract 1000 mg, and green coffee bean extract 200 mg daily for 6 weeks does not lower blood pressure when compared with placebo (97723). However, some evidence suggests that at least part of the blood pressure lowering effects of beet might be independent of nitrate (97728). Furthermore, some research suggests that identifying effects on blood pressure might be dependent on the method of measurement, including clinic resting measurements, 24-hour monitoring, or morning/evening home resting measurements (97729).
• Hypertriglyceridemia. It is unclear if oral beet is beneficial in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Details: A small clinical study in overweight or obese individuals with dyslipidemia shows that taking freeze-dried beet leaf 2.8 grams daily for 4 weeks in addition to nutritional guidance does not lower triglyceride levels when compared with nutritional guidance alone (100146). Beet has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. A small clinical trial in patients at risk for heart disease shows that a specific combination of beet and hawthorn berry (Neo40-Daily, Neogenis Labs), taken twice daily for 30 days, can modestly reduce blood triglyceride levels when compared to baseline (18222). It is unclear if these findings are due to beet, hawthorn berry, or the combination.
• Liver disease. Although there has been interest in using oral beet for liver disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of beet for this purpose.
• Muscle strength. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial for muscle strength. Details: A meta-analysis of 18 clinical studies in healthy males shows that taking beetroot juice or beetroot gel 2-3 hours before exercise improves muscular strength when compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis suggests that beetroot-based supplements improve muscular strength in a fatigued but not resting state (113422). A small clinical study in adults with overweight or obesity on a calorie-restricted diet shows that drinking 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice daily for 14 days improves handgrip strength by approximately 18% compared with 4% in controls (111158). However, it is unclear whether any improvement is clinically significant.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral beet leaf or beetroot juice is beneficial for weight loss. Details: A small clinical study in patients with overweight or obesity and dyslipidemia shows that taking freeze-dried beet leaf 2.8 grams daily for 4 weeks in addition to nutritional guidance does not reduce body weight or body mass index (BMI) when compared with nutritional guidance alone (100146). Similarly, a small clinical study in adults with overweight or obesity on a calorie-restricted diet shows that drinking 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice daily for 14 days does not improve weight loss when compared with controls (111158). However, the size and duration of this study may have been inadequate to detect differences between groups.
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension. Details: A small clinical trial in pregnant patients with hypertension who are at approximately 22-35 weeks gestation shows that taking beetroot juice (James White Drinks Ltd) 70 mL daily for 8 days does not reduce blood pressure when compared with a nitrate-depleted beetroot juice (100151). However, the study was small and designed to investigate the feasibility of using beetroot juice in this population.
• Pulmonary hypertension. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking beetroot juice (Beet-It Sport; James White Drinks Ltd) 70 mL twice daily for 7 days does not improve right ventricular systolic function when compared with nitrate-depleted beetroot juice in patients with pulmonary hypertension (100149). However, this study was small and not adequately powered to detect differences between groups.
• Raynaud syndrome. It is unclear if oral beetroot juice is beneficial in patients with Raynaud syndrome. Details: A small clinical study in patients with Raynaud syndrome undergoing cold sensitivity tests shows that drinking beetroot juice (Beet-It, James White Drinks Ltd) 70 mL daily for 13 days, followed by 140 mL prior to testing, does not reduce pain in the hands or feet, but might improve thermal comfort in the feet, when compared to baseline (103884). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. More evidence is needed to rate beet for these uses.

(Read more about BEET)

EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Oral calcium carbonate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an antacid. Details: Taking calcium carbonate orally as an antacid is effective for treating dyspepsia (1843). Calcium carbonate has FDA approval as an antacid.
• Hyperkalemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities. Details: Administering calcium gluconate intravenously can reverse electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias induced by hyperkalemia (12946). Intravenous calcium gluconate is FDA-approved for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities.
• Hypocalcemia. Oral calcium treats and prevents hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium is used to treat severe hypocalcemia. Details: Taking calcium orally is effective for treating and preventing hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate, acetate, gluceptate, or chloride is effective for severe hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany (12928).
• Kidney failure. Oral calcium carbonate or calcium acetate is used as a phosphate binder during kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium carbonate or calcium acetate orally is effective as a phosphate binder. Calcium acetate (PhosLo) appears to control hyperphosphatemia better than sevelamer (Renagel) (12943,12944,38990). Calcium citrate is not recommended for this purpose because it increases aluminum absorption and does not bind phosphate as efficiently as calcium acetate or calcium carbonate (21631). Some clinical research also shows that taking calcium orally reduces blood pressure in patients with kidney failure (975).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral calcium in combination with vitamin D prevents bone density loss that occurs during long-term treatment with corticosteroids. Details: Taking calcium in combination with vitamin D as adjunctive therapy seems to be effective for reducing bone mineral density loss in people using corticosteroids long-term (982,1046,1830,1831,1832,4462,4463,4464,4465,4466)(4467,12945,38493). One specific product used in clinical research is Oscal (Marion Merrel Dow Inc.), which contains elemental calcium 500 mg per tablet plus vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (982). Another product used is Oscal 250 + D (SmithKline Beecham Healthcare), which contains elemental calcium 250 mg and vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (1046).
• Hyperparathyroidism. Oral calcium reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium orally reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with kidney failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism (1827,1828,1829,39174,39425). In elderly women, the combination of calcium and vitamin D reverses secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces hip fracture risk (8818). Also, population research suggests increased calcium intake from the diet and supplements reduces the risk of primary hyperparathyroidism in women. Supplemental intakes of at least 500 mg/day and dietary intakes of approximately 1100 mg/day are considered to be protective (91353).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate calcium intake, from the diet and/or supplements, is recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate calcium intake in line with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) by age, along with adequate vitamin D intake, for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake when adequate dietary intake is not feasible (109425). In the US and Canada, foods containing at least 200 mg calcium with less phosphorous content than calcium can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate calcium intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (11940,102148). However, calcium supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Also, calcium supplements do not seem to be effective for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) during lactation (988), in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation (1817), or in patients who have had renal transplantation (4823,38736,38871). Maximal bone growth occurs in the teenage years, and then BMD in females remains relatively constant until age 30-40. After age 40, bone loss typically occurs at rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. In males, this occurs several decades later. Bone loss is more pronounced if dietary calcium intake is below the RDA, which is the case for many Americans (2571,2578). One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy children 7-14 years old shows that fortifying food with calcium 250-1000 mg daily for up to 24 months modestly improves femoral neck BMD, but not hip or spine BMD. However, the included trials did not supplement vitamin D (107232). During the 5 years immediately after menopause, calcium supplementation has very little effect on bone loss (2569,2570,2575,2576). The rapid loss of estrogen causes a high bone resorption rate, which increases serum calcium levels and therefore decreases intestinal absorption of calcium (2570). After this period, the typical rate of bone loss is 2% per year (2572,2576). Taking calcium 1000-1600 mg daily as carbonate, citrate, lactate gluconate, or citrate malate salt decreases this rate by 0.25% to 1% annually (977,979,981,2569,2571,2572,2575,2576,2578,6850)(38978,38980,39064). The greatest reductions (1% or more) are seen in the first 1-2 years of supplementation when bone remodeling foci can be filled (2569,2576). After this period, the differences in rate of loss between supplemented and non-supplemented females are closer to 0.25% per year (2569,2577). A meta-analysis of clinical evidence suggests that there is no additional benefit after 4 years (38980). Small clinical studies have found that continuous calcium supplementation at an average daily dose of 1050 mg, started after menopause and continued for 1.5-4 years, may reduce fracture rates by 26% when compared with no calcium supplementation. The largest of these studies was conducted in nursing home residents who also received daily vitamin D; the benefits of calcium, specifically, are unclear (39386). Some research also suggests that calcium and vitamin D improves primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in some older individuals with osteoporosis, particularly the elderly and those who are no longer community dwelling (12930,38875,38849,39026,109471). However, not all research is positive. One large clinical trial in elderly adults with a low-trauma fracture show that taking calcium 1000 mg daily with or without vitamin D 800 IU daily for 2-7 years does not reduce the risk of a second fracture when compared with placebo (13073). Another clinical study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 800 IU daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (less than 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). Also, some exploratory research suggests that supplements may need to be continued indefinitely; in adults over 68 years of age, any effects of 2 years of calcium supplements on BMD appear to be lost within 2 years after discontinuing supplements (6853). Calcium has additive effects when used with other agents such as vitamin D, estrogens, or calcitonin. Whereas calcium alone generally reduces or prevents loss of BMD, combination with other agents can produce small increases in BMD ranging from 0.3% to 3.3% depending on the combination and dosages used (978,980,1836,2570,2571,2572,2576). However, one meta-analysis in healthy adults shows that fortifying foods with calcium 250-1000 mg daily, in conjunction with vitamin D supplementation, for up to 24 months does not improve BMD when compared with control (107232). The full potential of osteoporosis treatments cannot be realized without adequate calcium intake (2569,2570,2571,2572). Advise patients taking agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene (Evista) to ensure that their daily calcium intake meets the RDA. Use supplements if necessary. The usefulness of calcium in preventing osteoporosis in males is not as well-studied. Some observational research has found that calcium 870 mg daily is not associated with changes in BMD and bone loss in males (97201). However, clinical evidence suggests that taking calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years might improve trabecular or cortical bone mass by 2% to 4% (980,8827,8873). Dietary supplementation with calcium and vitamin D seems to moderately reduce bone loss measured in the femoral neck, spine, and total body, and seems to reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in older patients with osteopenia or low BMD (980).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Adequate calcium intake seems to prevent symptoms of PMS. Details: There seems to be a link between low dietary calcium intake and symptoms of PMS (2004,6847,39007). Taking calcium 1000-1336 mg daily seems to significantly reduce depressed mood, water retention, and pain, especially if daily calcium intake is inadequate (1822,1823,1824,2004,95821). Calcium carbonate 1200 mg daily seems to decrease PMS symptom scores by about 18% when compared with placebo (1822). Increasing dietary calcium intake is also associated with a decreased risk of developing PMS. Consuming an average of 1283 mg of calcium per day from foods is associated with about a 30% lower risk of developing PMS compared with consuming an average of 529 mg daily (13094); however, taking calcium supplements does not appear to be associated with the risk of developing PMS.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Oral calcium seems to be beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer, especially in those with adequate vitamin D levels and normal body mass index (BMI). Details: Population studies have found that increased intake of dietary or supplemental calcium is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas (1047,8820,12120,38951,98898,98899). Clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research also show that taking calcium supplements 1.2-2 grams daily for up to 4 years can reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence by up to 29% (970,12118,12950,15267,34596,38718,39042,95817). However, not all research has been positive. Some meta-analyses of clinical research or observational studies suggest that taking calcium does not reduce the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer (34596,39042,39349). Other contradictory research suggests that postmenopausal females who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290); however, this finding may not be reliable due to the high baseline intake of calcium in study participants. The reason for these conflicting findings is not entirely clear. Vitamin D might be an important factor. People with lower than average vitamin D levels do not seem to get any benefit from calcium supplements (12118). Also, one meta-analysis of previous trials suggests that taking calcium 1200 mg daily reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas in people with a normal BMI, but not in those who are overweight or obese (99715). Despite this conflicting evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2005 stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence to support this claim (102366).
• Fetal bone mineralization. If calcium intakes are low during pregnancy, oral calcium seems to be beneficial for increasing fetal bone density. Details: With low dietary calcium intake (less than 562 mg elemental calcium daily) during pregnancy, calcium supplementation increases fetal bone mineralization and density. However, calcium supplementation does not offer any additional benefit if calcium intakes are adequate (3263,3264).
• Hypertension. Oral calcium seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount in adults with or without hypertension. However, it is unclear if this reduction is clinically significant. Details: Many clinical trials and observational studies, including a meta-analysis of 18 high-quality clinical trials, show that intake of calcium supplements or dietary calcium modestly reduces systolic blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension, usually around 1-2 mmHg. Calcium seems to be more effective for certain subpopulations of patients, such as those who are salt-sensitive or have low baseline dietary calcium intake (945,972,974,976,984,1818,1819,1820,1821,6852)(13138,14406,38803,39063,39094,39221,113920,113925). However, a large-scale clinical trial in postmenopausal females shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg daily does not lower blood pressure or reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials shows that taking calcium in combination with vitamin D for up to 7 years has no effect on blood pressure (98861). The validity of this finding is limited by the poor methodological quality of the included studies. Some observational research suggests that calcium can reduce the risk for hypertension. Population research in females aged 45 years and older suggests that higher intake of calcium from both diet and supplemental sources is linked to a lower risk of developing hypertension when compared to lower calcium intake (14265). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension. However, the FDA has concluded that this claim is based on supporting, rather than conclusive, evidence (102367). Research evaluating the effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on the child's blood pressure has yielded conflicting findings. A systematic review of 2 clinical studies and 3 observational studies found that calcium intake during pregnancy is associated with a 1-2 mmHg reduction in the systolic blood pressure of the offspring between the ages of 1-7 years (38852). However, a separate meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies shows that calcium intake during pregnancy does not reduce systolic or diastolic blood pressure in the offspring (113923).
• Osteomalacia. Oral calcium seems to reverse osteomalacia caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Osteomalacia is commonly caused by vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to osteomalacia in children and adults. Calcium supplementation can reverse osteomalacia caused by calcium deficiency. Along with appropriate vitamin D supplementation, individuals at risk of osteomalacia need sufficient calcium intake (94819).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral calcium seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia, especially in high-risk individuals and those with low baseline dietary calcium intake. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (971,38756), most clinical research shows that taking calcium orally 1-2 grams daily reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia (973,1833,8828,39043,39319,39426,97348,113919). A large clinical trial of 11,000 pregnant individuals in India and Tanzania shows that supplementation with 500 mg daily is similarly effective to 1500 mg daily (113908). Multiple meta-analyses which include 16-30 clinical studies have found that varying doses of calcium supplementation reduce the relative risk of pre-eclampsia by 46% to 51% when compared with placebo (97348,113909,113919). One of these meta-analyses found that for every 19 females treated with calcium, one episode of pre-eclampsia would be avoided (97348). Additionally, one of these meta-analyses found that calcium reduces the relative risk of pre-eclampsia by 51%, regardless of whether it is taken at a dose above or below 1000 mg daily (113919). Some research suggests that calcium supplementation may have a greater effect in individuals at high risk of pre-eclampsia or with low baseline dietary calcium intake, and when taken at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation (15029,38497,97348,99714,113919). However, another meta-analysis of 30 clinical studies found a similar benefit of calcium in both high- and low-risk individuals (113919). A separate meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies conducted in China evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy. This combination was associated with an 80% lower relative risk of pre-eclampsia and an 83% lower relative risk of pre-eclampsia with gestational hypertension when compared with routine care (113913). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding the use of calcium supplements to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. However, due to the limited and conflicting research available at that time, the FDA stated that this outcome was highly unlikely (102366). Since then, large, high-quality clinical research has supported this finding. In fact, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released a recommendation to prescribe oral calcium 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancies at high risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary calcium intakes are low (97347).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. Oral calcium may reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Details: A meta-analysis of 17 clinical studies shows that calcium supplementation during pregnancy may reduce the relative risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension by 30% when compared with control (113909). A separate meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies conducted in China, which evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy, shows that this combination reduces the relative risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension by 85% when compared with routine care (113913).
• Rickets. Oral calcium seems to reverse rickets caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Rickets is commonly caused be vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to rickets. Calcium supplementation can reverse rickets caused by calcium deficiency (94819). A small clinical study in children with nutritional rickets shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily for 24 weeks improves radiographically measured rickets caused by calcium deficiency. Rickets seems to improve more rapidly with calcium 1000 mg compared to calcium 500 mg. However, increasing the calcium dose to 2000 mg daily is not more beneficial than calcium 1000 mg daily (98904).
• Tooth retention. Oral calcium with vitamin D seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral calcium, via supplementation or as part of the diet, does not seem to be beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Although some studies disagree (15631,39041,95811,107237,113917), most population research suggests that increased calcium intake is not associated with overall breast cancer risk (15631,16715,98895,107236,107237,113917). However, one meta-analysis of observational studies shows that although higher total calcium intake is not associated with breast cancer risk, higher dietary calcium intake, specifically, may be associated with a slightly reduced risk (113917). Also, some analyses suggest that calcium intake may be associated with the risk for certain breast cancer sub-types. Some subgroup analyses suggest that calcium intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, adults (15631,107237) and that dietary calcium intake may reduce estrogen receptor(ER)-negative breast cancer, but not ER-positive breast cancer (107236). However, most research has not evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation or intake on breast cancer subtypes. The best evidence to date, from a large scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years after menopause does not reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer at the end of the study and 5 years after the end of the intervention (16715,98895).
• Fractures. Although oral calcium prevents fractures in osteoporosis, most evidence shows that calcium does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis discussion for more information on the use of calcium for this purpose. Details: Robust meta-analyses of mostly large, high-quality clinical studies show that calcium supplementation 500-1600 mg daily for 0.5-7 years with or without vitamin D does not reduce total fractures, hip fractures, vertebral fractures, or non-vertebral fractures in older adults without osteoporosis (95822,112486). A large-scale study in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years who were enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) suggests that calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D 400 IU daily for 7 years only modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) and does not significantly reduce fracture risk. This lack of effect may have been due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. In those who were 80% adherent, the combination of calcium plus vitamin D reduced the risk of hip fracture by about 29% (14282). Also, some clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 5 years does not attenuate loss of height after menopause when compared with placebo (95810). Additional meta-analyses of clinical and observational evidence suggest that calcium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, such as hip fractures (38589,38888,98895). Some other research has suggested that calcium in combination with vitamin D reduces fracture risk in older patients without osteoporosis (980,1836,8818,12930,12933,12952,38849,102145,107235); however, this research is confounded by a number of variables, including the presence of hormonal therapy and differing levels of fracture risk at baseline (1836,8818,95822). Conflicting findings on this topic might also be due to genetic differences in patient populations. A population analysis of the WHI study found that, in older females with the lowest genetic susceptibility to low BMD, taking calcium with vitamin D is associated with a reduction in fracture risk. However, in females with a higher genetic susceptibility to low BMD, there is no association between supplementation and fracture risk. This might be because individuals with a lower susceptibility to low BMD are also more responsive to calcium and vitamin D supplementation (97357). As of April 2018, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with vitamin D >400 IU daily along with calcium >1000 mg daily is safe and effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture. USPSTF recommends against supplementing with calcium 1000 mg daily or less along with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal females (95695).
• Obesity. Oral calcium does not seem to improve weight loss in adults or children with overweight or obesity. Details: Observational research has found that adults and children with low calcium intake are more likely to gain weight, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and be overweight or obese when compared to people with high calcium intake (12124,12125,12126,12127,14265). Additional observational research has found that increasing calcium intake is associated with weight loss in females; the results in males have been conflicting (12127,15602,15603). Despite these findings from observational research and a few small clinical studies (12128,15397,14438,98905,113918), most clinical research has found that increased calcium intake does not increase weight loss (12052,13138,15396,15399,38985,39004,97356). A meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies shows that daily dietary and supplemental calcium intake that meets the dietary reference intake (DRI) of 1000 mg or more daily does not increase weight loss in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when compared with intake below the DRI (95813). An older meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials also shows that increased dietary and supplemental calcium intake does not increase weight loss (15605).
• Overall mortality. Oral calcium does not seem to reduce overall mortality. Details: While some population research has found that calcium taken in combination with vitamin D in older females is associated with a lower risk of death (97353), most evidence shows that calcium, with or without vitamin D, has no effect on all-cause mortality (93533,97308,113584).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral calcium does not reduce the risk of developing CVD and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Clinical research shows that calcium does not decrease CVD risk. Several separate meta-analyses of clinical and population research involving over 50,000 patients show that taking calcium 600-1200 mg daily for up to 7 years does not reduce the risk of CVD-related outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or overall mortality (39018,91350,92994,93533,97308,98902,107231,107233). No association was found between total dietary or supplemental calcium intake with or without vitamin D and the risk of CVD or mortality (91350,93533,97308). In fact, some population and clinical research has found that when calcium is used alone or with vitamin D, there is an INCREASED risk of CVD and coronary heart disease (38077,107233). However, other clinical research disagrees (93533). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease by 1.1-1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Intravenous calcium does not prevent nerve pain in patients given oxaliplatin. Oral calcium has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: While pooled analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials suggest that calcium and magnesium infusion decreases the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials shows that the infusion has no effect in preventing neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). Additionally, clinical trials show that administering calcium gluconate 1 gram with magnesium sulfate 1 gram intravenously immediately before, or before and after, the administration of a single oxaliplatin cycle (90005), or over the entire 6-cycle course of oxaliplatin, does not improve symptoms of neurotoxicity when compared with placebo (96474).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral calcium does not prevent MI. When taken in the absence of vitamin D, oral calcium may increase the risk of MI. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of calcium is associated with a decreased risk of MI (91350). However, a 2010 meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking calcium at a dose of at least 500 mg daily is associated with an approximate 30% INCREASE in the risk of MI in patients over the age of 40. According to this analysis, one additional case of MI will occur for every 69 patients that take calcium for 5 years (17482). A more recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of MI by 1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research studied postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233) In contrast, other meta-analyses of clinical research have shown that taking calcium for up to 7 years is NOT associated with an increased risk of MI, including a meta-analysis that only included postmenopausal females (93533,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI in postmenopausal females (93533). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for alcohol use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 800 mg and vitamin D 200 IU orally daily for 14 days modestly reduces alcohol craving scores and withdrawal scores when compared with placebo in adults with alcohol dependence that are undergoing withdrawal. Taking calcium carbonate did not reduce the need for diazepam; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (107234).
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for atherosclerosis. Details: A population study has found that taking calcium 1.2 grams daily for 3 years has no effect on carotid intima thickness or carotid atherosclerosis incidence. A total calcium intake (dietary and supplemental) of at least 1794 mg daily in older females may be associated with a decreased risk of carotid atherosclerosis when compared with a total calcium intake below 1010 mg daily (97351).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the odds of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. Details: A small observational study found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a 52% reduced odds of an autism spectrum disorder in the offspring (98900).
• Brain tumor. It is unclear if dietary calcium intake is associated with risk of brain tumor. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 case-control studies has found that higher dietary calcium intake is associated with a lower odds of brain tumor when compared with lower dietary intake (113922). The validity of this finding is limited by the exploratory nature of the included studies, which analyzed all dietary ingredients for any potential associations.
• Cancer. Oral calcium alone does not seem to prevent cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Taking calcium alone does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of cancer (12118,15629). The role of calcium in cancer prevention when taken along with vitamin D is controversial, as conflicting results exist. One clinical trial shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1400-1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1100 IU daily have a 60% lower relative risk for developing cancer of any type. Approximately 25 postmenopausal females would need to take this combination for 4 years to prevent one occurrence of cancer (15629). However, a more recent clinical study shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of cancer at 4 years (93943). Reasons for the disparate results are not entirely clear. The discrepancies do not appear to be related to baseline vitamin D levels or different study populations. It is possible that, given the 10-year time lapse between the two publications, the discrepancies result from differences in cancer detection capability. Also, since cancer risk was a secondary outcome measure in the earlier study and a primary outcome measure in the more recent study, it is possible that the discrepancies result from differences in statistical methodologies. The effect of vitamin D and calcium on cancer risk in males and younger patients is not known. There is also interest in using calcium for reducing the risk of hematological malignancies. An analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU for up to 10 years is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of hematologic malignancies when compared with placebo. However, no effect on hematologic malignancy related mortality was seen (97354).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between a higher dietary intake of calcium and the risk of depression when compared with a lower dietary intake of calcium (96480).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if dietary calcium intake is associated with type 2 diabetes risk. Details: Some population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from the diet or supplements, alone or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713,96473,113929). One meta-analysis of cohort and cross-sectional studies found that the highest level of dietary calcium intake is associated with an 18% relative reduction in risk of type 2 diabetes when compared with the lowest level of intake. A dose-response analysis suggests that each 300, 600, and 1000 mg per day increase in dietary calcium intake is associated with a 7%, 14%, and 23% reduced risk of type 2 diabetes, respectively (113929). However, population research is often limited by confounding variables. For example, one analysis suggests that any beneficial effect might be influenced by concomitant magnesium intake (96473,113929), while another suggests that any benefit from increased intake may be more pronounced in females, adults aged 50 years or older, and Asian populations (113929). Furthermore, other population research has found that serum calcium levels higher than 9.6 mg/dL are associated with greater risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults with osteoporosis (95815).
• Dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for dyslipidemia. Details: One clinical study in adults with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia shows that adding calcium carbonate 400 mg three times daily to a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) for 6 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4% and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 4% when compared with the low-fat diet and placebo (2557). In contrast, a clinical study in females with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 800 mg daily for 2 years INCREASES total cholesterol levels and carotid intima-media thickness in postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, females when compared with placebo (97350). Calcium supplementation has also been evaluated in combination with vitamin D. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including adults with normolipidemia and dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily and vitamin D 200-7142 IU daily modestly improves HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplementation is most beneficial in patients with dyslipidemia at baseline (107227). The relationship between dietary calcium intake and serum lipid levels has also been evaluated in observational research. A meta-analysis of 7-11 observational studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with total cholesterol levels, although small differences in individual lipid parameters were identified. Additionally, a meta-analysis of 4-9 observational studies suggests that calcium intake is not associated with the risk of developing hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, or low HDL. A subgroup analysis found that higher calcium intake may be associated with lower triglyceride levels in Asian populations (113927). Overall, these findings are limited by significant heterogeneity and the cross-sectional nature of the included studies.
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing pain associated with dysmenorrhea. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg with vitamin D 5000 IU daily for three menstrual cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (95821). However, calcium carbonate 1000 mg taken alone seems to reduce pain when compared with placebo.
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but dietary calcium does not seem to have any effect (38893).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A very small clinical study in resistance-trained adults shows that taking calcium carbonate 500 mg 4 times daily for 3 weeks does not attenuate exercise-induced muscle damage from bench presses when compared with placebo (113933). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing falls. Details: Research suggests that calcium in combination with vitamin D, but not calcium alone, might prevent falls by decreasing body sway and normalizing systolic blood pressure (6362,11939,39038). Some experts think the combination of calcium and vitamin D may be important (11916). Preliminary clinical research in adults residing in a health care facility shows that taking vitamin D supplements while increasing dietary calcium and protein for 2 years reduces falls by 11% when compared with standard diets. Intervention diets were supplemented with milk, yogurt, and cheese to provide calcium 1142 mg and protein 69 grams daily (107235). There might also be different effects in females compared to males. In one study, females aged 65 years or older who took vitamin D 700 IU plus calcium citrate 500 mg daily over a 3-year period had a 46% lower risk of falling. However, this combination did not decrease falls in males (14291).
• Fluorosis. Oral calcium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking calcium orally, in combination with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and vitamin D, seems to be effective for reducing excessive fluoride levels in children and improving symptoms of fluorosis in children aged 6-12 years (990).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral calcium in combination with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing heart failure. Details: Based on a secondary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), taking calcium 1000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily does not reduce the risk of heart failure in the overall population or in individuals at high risk. However, in a subgroup of postmenopausal females without risk factors for heart failure, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of developing heart failure by about 37% (97307).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing blood levels of lead. Details: Lead is mobilized along with calcium from bone during pregnancy and lactation, resulting in increased serum concentrations of lead. One clinical study suggests that calcium supplementation does not significantly decrease these elevated lead concentrations (1586). However, another clinical study suggests that taking calcium reduces blood lead levels by 11% when compared with placebo, with greatest effects observed in those with high baseline levels of lead (38957).
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral calcium for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of calcium for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium alone or with vitamin D is beneficial for metabolic syndrome prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet and supplements alone, or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713).
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing nephrotic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium 500-1000 mg daily for 3 months in combination with vitamin D3 60,000 IU daily or weekly for 4 weeks has no effect on bone mineral density or the risk of relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (97355).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking calcium alone or with vitamin D3 1000 IU daily reduced the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but had no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma (104622).
• Oral mucositis. When used in combination with fluoride treatments, a calcium phosphate mouth rinse seems to prevent and reduce mucositis-related pain in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that using a particular mouth rinse (Caphosol, EUSA Pharma) containing calcium phosphate, in combination with fluoride treatments, reduces days of mucositis, the duration of pain, and the dose and days of morphine used when compared with placebo and fluoride treatment (38611).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: An older meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (38792). However, a more recent pooled analysis of 15 cohort and case-control studies has found that the highest intake of dietary or dairy calcium is associated with a 20% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared to the lowest intake (97349).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing postpartum depression risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium 2 grams daily beginning at 11-21 weeks gestation reduces depression at 12 weeks postpartum when compared with placebo. However, no benefit is seen at 6 weeks postpartum (39447).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing leg cramps during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking calcium 1 gram twice daily (as a mixture of salts) for 2 weeks can reduce pregnancy-related leg cramps during the second half of pregnancy when compared with no treatment (2567).
• Prematurity. It is unclear if supplemental calcium is beneficial for the growth and development of preterm infants. Details: A small clinical study in preterm infants consuming human milk shows that supplementation with calcium 45 mg/kg daily and phosphorus 25 mg/kg daily does not affect infant weight, length, head circumference, or risk of osteopenia after 6 weeks when compared with human milk alone (113924). However, the duration and size of this study may have been too limited to detect any difference between groups.
• Preterm labor. It is unclear if oral calcium reduces the risk of preterm labor. Details: A meta-analysis of 10 clinical studies shows that taking calcium supplements during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of preterm labor when compared with placebo (113909). A separate meta-analysis of 7 clinical studies conducted in China, which evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy, shows that this combination reduces the relative risk of preterm labor by 74% when compared with routine care (113913).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily might decrease the risk of developing prostate cancer (14133). However, some epidemiological research suggests that consuming very high doses of calcium, over 2000 mg daily, might actually increase the risk of developing prostate cancer (14134). Some epidemiological research also suggests that doses greater than 1500 mg daily increase the risk of poorly differentiated, clinically advanced, and fatal prostate cancer (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer (98894). However, contradictory research suggests that there is no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall risk of prostate cancer (14131,14132,104630).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Some population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke (4822,38678). However, other population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is not associated with a decreased risk of stroke (91350). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years does not affect the risk of stroke when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females, and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Vertigo. Oral calcium with vitamin D might reduce positional vertigo; the effect of calcium when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking calcium 500 mg and vitamin D 400 IU twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate calcium for these uses.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Bowel preparation. Taking cascara sagrada orally with magnesium sulfate or magnesium hydroxide prior to colonoscopy does not appear to improve bowel cleansing when used alone or as an adjunct to polyethylene glycol. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking a specific combination of cascara sagrada plus magnesium sulfate (Pico-Salax) orally along with polyethylene glycol (GoLYTELY) is not more effective than polyethylene glycol alone for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy (40086). Other clinical research shows that taking cascara sagrada plus magnesium sulfate orally, alone or in combination with polyethylene glycol (GoLYTELY), is actually less effective than polyethylene glycol alone (40087,40088). Additionally, some clinical research shows that taking a combination of cascara sagrada 5 mL plus milk of magnesia 30 mL orally does not improve bowel cleansing or examination quality when compared with no bowel preparation (40090,40093).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Constipation. It is unclear if oral cascara sagrada is beneficial in patients with constipation. Details: Cascara sagrada has a history of use for its laxative effects in patients with constipation (272). In fact, cascara sagrada was formerly approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a safe and effective over-the-counter (OTC) laxative; however, this designation was removed in 2002 due to a lack of supporting evidence (8229). More evidence is needed to rate cascara sagrada for this use.

(Read more about CASCARA SAGRADA)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Pregnancy-related iron deficiency. Oral chlorella, which contains iron, can help to prevent iron deficiency and anemia in pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study in Japanese patients in their first trimester of pregnancy shows that taking chlorella (Sun Chlorella A, Sun Chlorella Corp.) 2 grams three times daily, providing 7.2 mg iron daily, starting at the 12-18th week of gestation and continuing until delivery, reduces the incidence of maternal anemia, defined as a hemoglobin level less than 11 g/dL, to about 30%, compared with about 60% in patients receiving no intervention (95013).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Brain tumor. It is unclear if oral chlorella is beneficial in patients with glioma. Details: A small clinical study in patients with glioma shows that taking chlorella tablets plus chlorella liquid extract over 2 years might improve tolerability of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but does not seem to affect tumor progression or survival, when compared to baseline (6804). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Depression. It is unclear if oral chlorella is beneficial as an adjunct to conventional antidepressant therapy in patients with major depressive disorder. Details: One open-label clinical trial in patients with major depressive disorder shows that taking chlorella extract tablets (ALGOMED, Bioprodukte Prof. Steinberg Produktions-und Vertreibs GmbH & Co.) 600 mg three times daily in addition to standard antidepressant therapy for 6 weeks improves subjective symptoms of depression and anxiety, measured on the Beck Depression Inventory II and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, when compared with standard antidepressant therapy alone (92132). The validity of this finding is limited by the large number of patients lost to follow-up and a lack of blinding.
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral chlorella improves symptoms of dysmenorrhea. Details: A small clinical study in females 18-35 years of age with primary dysmenorrhea shows that taking chlorella (American Super Golden Med) 1500 mg daily for 8 weeks modestly decreases the severity and duration of painful menstrual cramps when compared with placebo (99882). This study is limited by small sample size and unclear allocation concealment.
• Exercise-induced respiratory infections. It is unclear if oral chlorella can prevent respiratory infections related to exercise. Details: A small clinical trial in physically active adults shows that taking chlorella (Sun Chlorella A, Sun Chlorella Corp.) 3 grams twice daily for 6 weeks increases salivary IgA, a marker of immune response, but doesn't improve the duration or severity of upper respiratory symptoms or reduce the risk for upper respiratory tract infections when compared with placebo (99881). However, this study was likely underpowered to detect differences in these outcomes.
• Fatigue. It is unclear if oral chlorella improves fatigue from exercise. Details: A small clinical trial in healthy males shows that taking chlorella (Chlorella Kogyo Co., Ltd) 2 grams three times daily for 4 weeks does not decrease exercise-induced fatigue or fatigue at rest when compared with placebo (99880).
• Fibromyalgia. It is unclear if oral chlorella improves symptoms of fibromyalgia. Details: A small open-label clinical trial in people with fibromyalgia shows that taking chlorella tablets (Sun Chlorella) 10 grams plus a liquid chlorella extract (Wakasa Gold) 100 mL daily for 2 months improves general symptoms and pain scores when compared with baseline (5890). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Halitosis. Although there is interest in using oral chlorella for halitosis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of chlorella for this purpose.
• Hepatitis C. It is unclear if oral chlorella improves outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection shows that taking chlorella tablets (Sun Chlorella A, Sun Chlorella Corp) 1500 mg twice daily for one week, then 1500 mg three times daily for 11 weeks, in addition to an extract containing 82 mg/mL of chlorella (Wakasa Gold, Sun Chlorella Corp) 30 mL twice daily for 12 weeks, decreases alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, but not aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or HCV RNA levels, when compared to baseline (92130). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Hyperlipidemia. It is unclear if oral chlorella reduces lipid levels. Details: A meta-analysis of mostly low-quality clinical studies in healthy adults and those with metabolic disorders shows that taking chlorella 900-5000 mg daily for 3-8 weeks reduces both total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by about 8 mg/dL but does not reduce triglycerides or increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol when compared with placebo (113623). Additionally, a small clinical trial in patients with mild hypercholesterolemia, defined as total cholesterol between 200-250 mg/dL, who are not using lipid-lowering medications, suggests that taking chlorella (Daesang Corp.) 1664 mg three times daily for 4 weeks reduces total cholesterol by 1.6% and triglycerides by 10.3%, but does not affect low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, when compared with placebo (92131). This study was limited by its short duration and small size.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral chlorella is beneficial in patients with hypertension. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with mild to moderate hypertension shows that taking chlorella 10 grams and chlorella extract 100 mL daily for 1-2 months does not reduce blood pressure when compared to baseline (41811).
• Metabolic syndrome. Although there is interest in using oral chlorella for metabolic syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of chlorella for this condition.
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Oral chlorella has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small open-label clinical trial in patients with NAFLD shows that taking chlorella extract 1200 mg with metformin 750 mg and vitamin E 200 mg daily for 3 months decreases alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and triglyceride levels when compared to baseline. Treatment with metformin 1250 mg and vitamin E 200 mg daily without chlorella does not appear to improve these outcome measures (99878). This study is limited by the lack of statistical comparison between groups.
• Peptic ulcers. Although there is interest in using oral chlorella for peptic ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of chlorella for this purpose.
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. It is unclear if oral chlorella is beneficial for preventing pregnancy-induced hypertension. Details: A small clinical study in healthy Japanese patients in their first trimester of pregnancy shows that taking chlorella (Sun Chlorella A, Sun Chlorella Corp.) 2 grams three times daily, starting at the 12-18th week of gestation and continuing until delivery, reduces proteinuria and leg edema, but does not affect blood pressure, when compared with no intervention (95013). It is unclear if chlorella is beneficial in patients who are at risk for hypertension during pregnancy.
• Ulcerative colitis. Although there is interest in using oral chlorella for ulcerative colitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of chlorella for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate chlorella for these uses.

(Read more about CHLORELLA)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Dysmenorrhea. In people with dysmenorrhea, taking oral ginger seems to reduce pain. Clinical research shows that ginger might be comparable to ibuprofen or mefenamic acid. In addition, taking ginger seems to be beneficial when used as an adjunct to mefenamic acid 250 mg twice daily. Details: Clinical research in individuals at least 15 years of age shows that ginger can reduce pain from dysmenorrhea. Clinical studies show that taking ginger powder 500-2000 mg daily usually for the first 3-4 days of a menstrual cycle modestly decreases pain severity by an average of 2.3-2.7 points on a 10-point scale when compared to control groups (89889,89899,91139,91892,96255,106077). However, a meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking ginger does not reduce pain duration when compared with placebo (106077). Clinical research also shows that ginger might be as effective as some anti-inflammatory agents. Taking a specific ginger extract (Zintoma, Goldaru) 250 mg four times daily for 3 days at the beginning of the menstrual period or until pain relief improves symptoms similarly to ibuprofen or mefenamic acid (17931,96259,106077). Also, taking a ginger extract 200 mg four times daily for 3-4 days at the beginning of pain is equally effective to taking Novafen, a combination of acetaminophen, caffeine, and ibuprofen (99444). Ginger also seems to improve pain when given as an adjunct to anti-inflammatory agents. A small clinical study in young females with dysmenorrhea shows that adding ginger (Vomigone, Dineh Co.) 500 mg daily to mefenamic acid 250 mg twice daily for 5 days further reduces pain when compared with taking mefenamic acid alone (102464).
• Osteoarthritis. Most clinical research shows that taking ginger extract by mouth improves pain in some patients with osteoarthritis. Topical ginger, on the other hand, has not shown benefit for knee osteoarthritis in low quality research. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking ginger extract 500-1000 mg daily for 3-12 weeks can modestly improve pain when compared with placebo in some patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip (96253,103357). However, a meta-analysis of two clinical studies shows that taking ginger extract about 500 mg daily for 6 weeks does not have an effect on function (103357). One small clinical trial in patients with mild osteoarthritis of the knee also shows that taking steamed golden ginger extract 480 mg daily for 12 weeks moderately improves pain and functional scores when compared with placebo (114784). Some clinical research has also compared ginger to conventional drug treatment. In one clinical trial, there was no significant difference between ginger extract 30 mg daily and ibuprofen 400 mg three times daily for one month in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee (17930). However, taking a specific ginger extract (Eurovita Extract 33; EV ext-33) orally 170 mg three times daily for 3 weeks was significantly less effective than ibuprofen 400 mg three times daily for reducing pain (7048). Since ginger is thought to take several weeks for significant benefit, this trial might not have lasted long enough. Ginger has also been compared with diclofenac. When used orally as 1500 mg daily in two divided doses, ginger is less effective than oral diclofenac 100 mg daily in two divided doses, or the combination of ginger and diclofenac, for 12 weeks (89898). Various studies have evaluated formulations containing ginger with other ingredients. These combinations have all been shown to improve osteoarthritis pain, and in some cases, functionality. Studied formulations include ginger (Eurovita Extract 35; EV ext-35) 340 mg with glucosamine (Zinaxin glucosamine, Ferrosan AS) 1000 mg daily for 4 weeks, a ginger extract with an alpinia (Alpinia galanga) extract (Eurovita Extract 77; EV ext-77) 255 mg twice daily for 6 weeks, a ginger extract with curcuminoids, and extracts of devil's claw, Boswellia serrata, and celery (Tregocel) for 36 weeks, or Ayurvedic shunthi-guduchi formulations containing ginger, Indian gooseberry, and Tinospora cordifolia, either with or without Boswellia serrata (7084,18210,89557,106078). However, it's too early to know if the effects of these combination agents are associated with ginger or other ingredients in the formulations. Topical ginger, alone or in combination with other ingredients, has also been studied for knee osteoarthritis. Although a meta-analysis of two randomized clinical trials shows no evidence of benefit of topical ginger for pain and disability when compared with placebo or standard therapy (103357), some benefits have been shown in individual preliminary studies (20340,20341,89897,96668,97537,97542). These trials have used a specific gel containing ginger and plai 4% by weight (Plygersic gel, Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research) 4 grams/day in four divided doses for 6 weeks (89897), an ointment composed of ginger, cinnamon, mastic (Saghez), and sesame oil twice daily for 6 weeks (20340), or one gram of ginger extract 5% (standardized to 11.18% of 6-gingerol) in a nanostructure lipid carrier three times daily for up to 12 weeks to the affected knee (96668,97537). Some studies have used ginger essential oil in a massage oil, alone or with sweet orange essential oil or standard therapy, twice weekly for 3 or 6 weeks (20341,97542).
• Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oral ginger seems to reduce the severity of nausea and vomiting in some people during pregnancy. Ginger seems to be more effective than placebo, comparable to vitamin B6 or dimenhydrinate, and less effective than metoclopramide. Details: Although most clinical studies are small and have methodological limitations, the available research shows that ginger is more effective than placebo, and comparable to vitamin B6 or dimenhydrinate (721,1922,5343,11346,13071,16306,20312,20315,90103,91201,102462). Although ginger is comparable to dimenhydrinate for reducing symptoms of morning sickness, it seems to take about 3 days to reduce vomiting episodes compared to 1 day with dimenhydrinate (16305). In addition, clinical research shows that ginger is less effective than metoclopramide at relieving nausea and vomiting associated with pregnancy (20315). Ginger doses of 500 to 2500 mg daily, divided into two to four daily doses for 3 days to 3 weeks, have been used in clinical research (721,5343,16305,16306,20312,20315,90103,91201). The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) considers ginger capsules 250 mg 4 times daily a first-line nonpharmacological treatment option for pregnancy-induced nausea based on limited evidence. However, there is no evidence that ginger reduces vomiting (111601).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Most clinical research shows that oral ginger does not reduce acute or delayed CINV. The effect of ginger might depend on the dose, the other antiemetics used, or the specific chemotherapy regimen. Details: Most clinical research shows that taking ginger as adjunct to adequate antiemetic therapy does not reduce DELAYED CINV when compared with antiemetic therapy alone (20316,96260,89891,96675,97538,97541,101760,102461,113616). Clinical research from meta-analyses and most individual clinical studies also show that taking ginger 0.5-3.5 grams as an adjunct to standard antiemetic therapy does not reduce the incidence or severity of ACUTE CINV when compared with antiemetic therapy alone (89891,96675,101760,102461,102466,113616). However, conflicting results exist from some individual clinical studies (20316,102466). These individual studies evaluated powdered ginger root or liquid extract of ginger root 0.5-2 grams taken in two to four divided doses daily, starting on either the day of or 3 days before chemotherapy and continuing for 3-5 days after chemotherapy initiation (20316,102466). Also, one small study shows that ginger in doses of 1 gram or less for more than 3 days reduces the likelihood of acute vomiting by 60% (101760). More research is needed to confirm the efficacy of this lower dose. Reasons for the conflicting results are unclear, but several theories have been postulated. One theory is that ginger might help reduce CINV associated with some, but not all, chemotherapy regimens. One preliminary clinical study shows that ginger 500 mg twice daily for 3 days reduces vomiting in patients receiving cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, but not in patients also receiving 5-fluorouracil or docetaxel (96251). However, since there is limited evidence supporting this theory, additional research is needed to confirm. Another theory is that ginger helps when used with certain antiemetic drugs, but not others. For example, ginger seems to help in cases when optimal antiemetic therapy, such as 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, is not available. Small clinical studies show that ginger reduces the severity of acute nausea when compared with prochlorperazine or metoclopramide, both of which are suboptimal antiemetic therapy for CINV (89891). Another small study shows that ginger is comparable to metoclopramide for improving delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea (13244). On the other hand, several studies show that taking ginger 0.5-2 grams daily along with antiemetic therapy that includes aprepitant does NOT improve acute or delayed CINV (20318,89891,96251,96675). In fact, one study found an association between concomitant use of ginger 2 grams daily with aprepitant and worsened severity of delayed nausea. Ginger is hypothesized to decrease the absorption of aprepitant and reduce its effectiveness for delayed nausea (20318,96675). However, this effect has not been replicated, and aprepitant serum levels were not measured to confirm this hypothesis. Finally, many of the studies showing a benefit of ginger for CINV when used as an adjunct to standard antiemetic therapy are considered to be methodologically flawed (20317,96252,96677). For instance, one study using powdered ginger root 1-2 grams daily during the first three days of chemotherapy in children and adults (20317) has been criticized for inaccurately representing data (89891). Other studies of ginger 500 mg twice daily for up to 10 days used questionable methods to measure outcomes and usually did not differentiate between acute and delayed CINV (96252,96677). Ginger essential oil aromatherapy has also been evaluated. One small study shows that using two drops of ginger essential oil on an aromatherapy necklace for 2 minutes daily for 5 days, starting on the first day of chemotherapy, reduces acute nausea, but not vomiting or delayed nausea, when compared with placebo in females with breast cancer taking standard antiemetics including granisetron, dexamethasone, and metoclopramide (96256).
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Most research shows that oral ginger in single or multiple doses does not prevent or treat exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: Two small studies in healthy adults show that single doses of ginger supplements do not seem to reduce muscle soreness from exercise. Taking capsules of ground ginger 2 grams, 30 minutes before a 30-minute cycling bout, or 24-48 hours after eccentric exercise, does not reduce muscle pain during exercise or within one hour of ingestion when compared with placebo (17932,17934). Taking multiple doses also does not seem to help. One small study in healthy adults shows that taking capsules with ginger powder 4 grams daily for 5 days before high-intensity eccentric exercise does not reduce muscle soreness over 4 days when compared with placebo (96258). Another small study in healthy adults shows that taking capsules of heated or raw ground ginger 2 grams daily for 8 days prior to eccentric exercise, and continuing supplementation for 3 more days, might modestly reduce muscle soreness 24 hours post-exercise, but not at later time points, when compared with placebo (17933,96258). Ginger has also been tested in combination with other ingredients. One small study in healthy adults shows that taking a specific combination product (ReWin(d), Natural Origins) containing a 4:3 ratio of ginger and annatto powder, 2 grams in divided doses daily for 4 weeks before eccentric exercise and continuing for 3 days after exercise, may modestly reduce muscle pain 48 hours after exercise but not at other time points (105057). This study was funded by the supplement manufacturer.
• Motion sickness. Most research shows that oral ginger does not prevent or treat motion sickness. Details: Most clinical research shows that taking ginger 500-1000 mg up to 4 hours prior to travel does not prevent motion sickness (7624,7625,20330,20331). Some patients report subjective feelings of improvement, but in many studies objective measures did not significantly improve (7400). However, one clinical trial suggests that ginger is more effective than dimenhydrinate at reducing gastrointestinal distress associated with motion sickness (20332). Another clinical study seems to show that taking ginger 1-2 grams as a single dose reduces nausea severity and increases the latency before the onset of nausea caused by simulated motion sickness when compared to baseline (20333). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Some small clinical studies show that giving ginger with tube feeds to hospitalized patients might reduce the duration of serious sequelae from ARDS. Details: A small clinical trial in adults with ARDS shows that administering ginger extract 120 mg in three divided doses daily via nasogastric tubing for 21 days increases the number of ventilator-free days and the amount of feeding tolerated and decreases the number of intensive care unit (ICU) days when compared with placebo. However, it does not seem to improve overall mortality (20343). Also, another small clinical study shows that adding ginger extract 120 mg to tube feeds in three divided doses daily for 8-21 days improves blood oxygen levels by 13% to 20%, as well as the ability of the lungs to expand by 17%, when compared with a coconut oil placebo. The duration of mechanical ventilation and stay in the ICU also improved. However, ginger does not affect other measurements of lung function or physical organ damage in these patients (89886).
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial in allergic rhinitis. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking ginger extract 500 mg daily for 6 weeks is as effective as loratadine 10 mg daily for reducing nasal symptoms of allergic rhinitis (103359).
• Antiretroviral-induced nausea and vomiting. Oral ginger seems to improve nausea and vomiting in patients using antiretroviral agents. Details: A small clinical study in patients with HIV shows that taking ginger 0.5 grams twice daily, 30 minutes prior to each dose of antiretroviral for 14 days, reduces the relative likelihood of nausea and vomiting by about 63% and 79%, respectively, when compared with placebo (89887).
• Asthma. Although there has been interest in using oral ginger for asthma, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ginger for this condition.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Topical ginger has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical trial in adults and children with eczema shows that applying a combination topical product containing ginger and cannabidiol twice daily for 5 days moderately improves eczema scores, including erythema, dryness, itching, and scaling, when compared to baseline. It is unclear if this effect is due to ginger, other ingredients, or the combination. The validity of this study is limited by the lack of a comparator group (114783).
• Back pain. Although there has been interest in using oral ginger for back pain, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ginger for this condition.
• Burns. Although there has been interest in using topical ginger for burns, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ginger for this condition.
• Cancer-related anorexia. It is unclear if oral ginger improves appetite in people with cancer-related anorexia. Details: A small clinical study in patients with cancer-related anorexia and cachexia shows that taking a capsule containing ginger 1650 mg daily for 14 days improves nausea, appetite, reflux, dysmotility, and other gastrointestinal symptoms when compared to baseline (102460). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of comparator group.
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Oral ginger has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking two capsules of a specific combination product (AKL1, AKL International Ltd.) containing ginkgo extract, ginger, and Picrorhiza kurroa twice daily for 8 weeks does not improve respiratory symptoms when compared with placebo in patients with COPD (89702). Another moderate-sized clinical study in adults with COPD shows that taking a combination product containing extracts of ginger, alpinia, cardamom, cinnamon, and saffron in honey 3 times daily for 8 weeks improves confidence in leaving home and the ratio of forced exploratory volume per second to forced vital capacity of the lungs (FEV1/FVC) when compared with placebo. However, the combination product does not improve most measures of respiratory function or symptoms such as cough, phlegm, chest tightness, dyspnea, reduced energy levels, sleeping disorders, or activity limitations when compared with placebo (111542). It is unclear if these effects are due to ginger, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Colic. Although there has been interest in using oral ginger for colic, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ginger for this condition.
• Constipation. Although there has been interest in using oral ginger for constipation, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ginger for this condition.
• Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unclear whether oral ginger is beneficial for patients with COVID-19. Details: Clinical research in adults hospitalized with asymptomatic COVID-19 infection shows that taking ginger 1.5 grams twice daily orally until hospital discharge reduces length of stay from around 8.5 days to 6 days, when compared with placebo. The strongest effect is seen in males over 60 years of age (110005). The relevance of these results is reduced by a lack of blinding, and the fact that the subjects were initially asymptomatic. Another small study in adults with COVID-19 treated in the community shows that taking ginger 1000 mg three times a day for 7 days does not improve viral clearance, oxygen saturation, or respiratory rate when compared with placebo. Taking ginger also did not reduce the risk of hospitalization (114779). The efficacy of ginger for treating COVID-19 has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. In adults with uncomplicated, moderate COVID-19, taking a combination of ginger, turmeric, ashwagandha, and boswellia (BV-4051, Artovid-20), 1776 mg twice daily orally for 14 days in addition to standard care and starting 48-96 hours after symptom onset, reduces the mean duration of symptoms from about 8 days to 7 days, when compared with placebo (109899). A small open-label study in adults with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 shows that taking ginger 1000 mg and ashwagandha 500 mg twice daily for 15 days, along with conventional therapy, leads to a 13.8-fold and 2.6-fold increase in the relative rate of clinical cure at 7 days and 15 days, respectively, when compared with conventional therapy alone. Taking this combination also appears to reduce time to recovery by around 6 days but does not improve the rate of negative COVID-19 tests, chest imaging findings, viral clearance, serum antibodies, or other measures of disease progression when compared with conventional therapy alone (112094). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of blinding, and the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups. Additionally, it is unclear if these effects are due to ginger, ashwagandha, or the combination.
• Diabetes. Some preliminary clinical studies suggest that oral ginger might have a small beneficial effect on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes or gestational diabetes. Details: Meta-analyses of several small clinical trials in adults with type 2 diabetes show that taking ginger 1200-3000 mg daily for 8-13 weeks reduces glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by around 0.6% to 1% and fasting blood glucose by 19-21 mg/dL when compared with placebo (96680,107898). However, a recent meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in adults with type 2 diabetes shows that taking ginger 1200-2000 mg daily for 4-12 weeks does not improve HbA1c or fasting blood glucose when compared with placebo (114780). The reasons for these discordant results are not entirely clear, but they are likely related to heterogeneity of the included populations, treatment dose, and duration of follow up. Additionally, a small clinical study in adults with diabetes on hemodialysis for end stage renal disease shows that taking ginger powder 2000 mg daily for 8 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose and measures of insulin resistance, but not serum insulin levels, when compared with placebo (111543). In patients with gestational diabetes at weeks 24-28 of pregnancy, clinical research shows that taking ginger 1500 mg daily in three divided doses for 6 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose, insulin levels, and measures of insulin resistance by a small amount when compared with placebo, with no effect on postprandial glucose levels (103358).
• Diabetic neuropathy. Topical ginger has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in adults treated with gabapentin for diabetic neuropathy of the foot shows that applying a combination balm containing ginger, menthol, camphor, and other ingredients three times a day for 4 weeks moderately improves pain scores when compared with a placebo balm without ginger but containing menthol, camphor, and other ingredients.(114781). It is unclear if this effect is due to ginger, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Diarrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral ginger for various types of diarrhea, including cholera and acute bacterial dysentery, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ginger for these conditions.
• Dry mouth. It is unclear if rinsing the mouth with ginger extract is beneficial for dry mouth. Details: In patients with dry mouth related to type 2 diabetes, clinical research shows that use of a ginger extract 25% mouthwash 20 mL three times daily for 14 days modestly reduces symptoms of dry mouth when compared with rinsing with a saline control mouthwash (106068). Although this study was indicated as being triple-blind, it is unclear how the taste of ginger was masked.
• Dyspepsia. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for dyspepsia. Details: In patients with dyspepsia, a small clinical trial shows that a single dose of ginger root powder 1.2 grams, taken 1 hour prior to eating, does not reduce abdominal discomfort when compared with placebo. However, it increases the rate of gastric emptying (20325).
• Erectile dysfunction (ED). It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for erectile dysfunction. Details: Preliminary clinical research in middle-aged males with ED shows that taking two capsules of a specific combination product (Revactin, MD Concepts LLC) containing ginger root 250 mg, muira puama 250 mg, guarana 250 mg, and L-citrulline 800 mg twice daily for 3 months improves scores related to erectile function and intercourse satisfaction, but does not improve sexual desire or orgasmic function scores, when compared to baseline (103224). This study is limited by the lack of a placebo control, the use of per-protocol analysis, and a high dropout rate. In fact, 44% of patients withdrew in order to resume use of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors. Further, it is unclear if these effects are due to ginger, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Gastroenteritis-associated nausea and vomiting. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for children with gastroenteritis-associated vomiting. Details: In children aged 1-10 years with acute gastroenteritis-associated vomiting, clinical research shows that taking a single dose of ginger reduces the risk of vomiting at least once in the subsequent 8 hours by 20% when compared with placebo. The incidence of vomiting over the next 24 and 48 hours was also modestly reduced. The children were given 20 drops of ginger equivalent to 10 mg immediately, followed by every 8 hours until cessation of vomiting. All children were offered hypotonic oral rehydration solution (ORS) 30 minutes after the first dose (106076). The number of children accepting ORS, and the quantity of ORS consumed, was less in the group receiving placebo. It is unclear if this affected the outcomes of this study. Also, the incidence or severity of nausea was not investigated.
• Hangover. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for managing symptoms of hangover. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that use of a decoction containing a combination of ginger 6 grams, pith of Citrus tangerine 3 grams, and brown sugar decreases symptoms of alcohol hangovers, including nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, when compared with placebo. The decoction was taken once 5 hours prior to drinking alcohol or four times after drinking alcohol (20320).
• Hyperlipidemia. Oral ginger may be modestly beneficial for some patients with hyperlipidemia. Details: A meta-analysis of preliminary clinical research in adults with and without hyperlipidemia shows that taking ginger 200-3000 mg orally daily for 2-24 weeks reduces triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 12 mg/dL and 5 mg/dL, respectively, and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 1 mg/dL when compared with placebo (109521). However, the validity of this study is limited by high heterogeneity. A clinical study in adults with hyperlipidemia shows that taking ginger powder 1 gram three times daily for 45 days reduces triglyceride and cholesterol levels by an additional 36% and 90%, respectively, when compared with placebo (20327).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for lowering blood pressure. Details: A preliminary clinical study in patients with diabetes and elevated systolic blood pressure shows that drinking black tea containing ginger 3 grams three times daily for 8 weeks does not reduce blood pressure by a clinically significant amount when compared with plain black tea (96669).
• Hypothyroidism. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial in patients with hypothyroidism. Details: A small clinical study in patients with primary hypothyroidism who are stabilized on thyroid hormone therapy shows that taking ginger powder 500 mg twice daily for 30 days improves symptoms associated with hypothyroidism, including cold intolerance, constipation, dizziness, dry skin, weight gain, and concentration and memory issues, when compared with placebo. However, ginger supplementation does not seem to improve hair loss, hearing, nail fragility, speech, or feelings of depression in these patients (107903).
• Insect bite. It is unclear if topical ginger is beneficial for reducing the size of insect bites. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that a topical application of Trikatu, which contains ginger, long pepper, and black pepper extracts with 0.074% piperine and 0.046% gingerol, does not reduce the papule size associated with mosquito bites when compared with a control compound containing the same base ingredients of camphor 2%, menthol 2%, and eucalyptus oil 4% (89893).
• Intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV). It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for preventing IONV. Details: Clinical research in individuals undergoing elective C-section and receiving cimetidine and metoclopramide, shows that taking ginger 1 gram orally 30 minutes prior to anesthesia reduces the number of episodes of intraoperative nausea, but not vomiting, when compared with placebo (89890). In other clinical research in adults undergoing elective surgical procedures, adding ginger to a high calorie drink consumed pre-operatively reduces the incidence of nausea from 40% to 10%, and the incidence of vomiting from 25% to 10% when compared with the high calorie drink alone (110007). The validity of these results is unclear as only patients were blinded to the treatment group.
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Oral ginger might reduce symptoms of IBS when used in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking ginger 1-2 grams daily for 28 days does not improve symptoms or the number of responders when compared with placebo (90102). However, some research shows that ginger might be beneficial in some patients when used along with other herbal ingredients. Taking a capsule containing ginger, boswellia, and yarrow three times daily for 30 days reduces the frequency and severity of abdominal pain, as well as the severity of bloating, when compared with placebo in females, but not males, with mild to moderate IBS (96673). Another clinical study shows that taking an herbal mixture containing ginger, English horsemint, and purple nut sedge tuber three times daily for 8 weeks improves IBS symptoms including abdominal pain, stool frequency, stool consistency, incomplete evacuation, and urgency, when compared to baseline; these improvements are similar to those achieved by taking mebeverine 135 mg three times daily (89900). However, it is unclear if these effects are due to ginger, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Joint pain. Oral ginger has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a specific combination product (Instaflex Joint Support, Direct Digital) containing glucosamine sulfate 1500 mg, methylsufonlylmethane 500 mg, white willow bark extract 250 mg, ginger root concentrate 50 mg, Boswellia extract 125 mg, turmeric root extract 50 mg, cayenne 40 m H.U. 50 mg, and hyaluronic acid 4 mg in three divided doses daily for 8 weeks reduces joint pain severity by 37% compared to only 16% with placebo. However, it does not improve joint stiffness or function when compared with placebo (89560). It is unclear if these effects are due to ginger, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Menorrhagia. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for menorrhagia. Details: Preliminary clinical research in healthy adults experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding shows that taking ginger 250 mg three times daily for 4 days, starting the day prior to menstruation, and repeating for three menstrual cycles, reduces the amount of menstrual bleeding when compared with placebo (96672).
• Menopausal symptoms. Although there has been interest in using oral ginger for menopausal symptoms such as insomnia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ginger for this purpose.
• Migraine headache. Small clinical studies suggest that oral ginger may modestly reduce migraine pain severity and duration. However, taking ginger doesn't seem to PREVENT migraines. Details: Ginger does not seem to be effective for the prevention of migraines. Clinical research in patients with episodic migraine shows that taking ginger extract 200 mg three times daily for 3 months does not reduce the number of migraine attacks, the use of analgesics, or the number of days with pain, any more than taking placebo (101761). However, ginger may be beneficial for the treatment of migraine. Clinical research shows that taking ginger extract 400 mg orally in the emergency room along with intravenous ketoprofen 100 mg reduces pain over the next 2 hours when compared with ketoprofen and placebo. This combination also resulted in an overall better response with a higher likelihood of having no or mild pain with treatment (101762). Taking ginger 250 mg at the onset of a common migraine headache seems to be as effective as taking sumatriptan 50 mg for reducing headache severity within two hours of treatment (89894). Furthermore, a combination of ginger and feverfew (GelStat Migraine, GelStat Corporation; LipiGesic M, PuraMed BioScience), administered sublingually at the onset of a migraine attack, decreases the duration and intensity of migraine pain when compared with placebo (19357,22602). It is unclear if these effects are due to ginger, feverfew, or the combination. Feverfew alone has demonstrated some benefit in treating migraines.
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for MS. Details: A small clinical study in adults with MS shows that taking ginger 500 mg three times daily for 12 weeks reduces disability scores and improves physical and psychological quality of life scores when compared with placebo (111541). Another small clinical study in adults with relapsing-remitting MS shows that taking ginger 500 mg three times daily for 12 weeks reduces the frequency and severity of nausea and constipation and the severity but not frequency of bloating when compared with placebo. However, no improvement was noted in other gastrointestinal symptoms of MS including abdominal pain, anorexia, diarrhea, dysphagia, gas, or heartburn (113614).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for NAFLD. Details: A small clinical study in patients with NAFLD shows that taking ginger 1000 mg twice daily for 12 weeks improves liver steatosis scores but not liver fibrosis scores when compared with placebo. Ginger also modestly improves levels of alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transferase but not aspartate aminotransferase (113615). However, it is unclear whether any improvements are clinically significant. Another small clinical study in patients with NAFLD shows that taking ginger root 1500 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and fasting blood glucose levels, but does not affect triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, insulin resistance, blood pressure, or fatty liver index, when compared with placebo (102465).
• Obesity. Oral ginger has primarily been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Although some individual research disagrees (40802), a meta-analysis and most individual clinical trials show that taking ginger alone or with other ingredients does not reduce weight by a clinically significant amount when compared with placebo in overweight or obese individuals (20346,20347,96676,109521). Ginger has been taken alone or in combination with green tea and capsaicin; rhubarb, astragalus, red sage, turmeric, and gallic acid (Number Ten); or raspberry ketone (Razberi K, Integrity Nutraceuticals), caffeine, capsicum extract (Capsimax, OmniActive Health Technologies), bitter orange fruit (Advantra Z, Nutratech Inc), L-theanine, and black pepper fruit extract (Biperine, Sabinsa Corporation) (Prograde Metabolism) (20346,20347,40802,96676). Due to the various other ingredients contained in available formulations, any effect from ginger is unclear.
• Parturition. It is unclear if bathing in a ginger bath is beneficial for shortening the duration of labor. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that bathing in 228 liters of water containing 4 drops of ginger essential oil does not shorten the duration of labor when compared with a regular bath (20345).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for females with PCOS. Details: Preliminary clinical research in females with PCOS shows that taking ginger 500 mg three times daily orally for 8 weeks decreases body weight, body mass index, and levels of follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone, when compared with placebo. It does not affect testosterone levels (110006).
• Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Evidence for the use of oral ginger for preventing PONV is inconclusive and conflicting. Reasons for the conflicting findings may relate to the ginger formulation used and the outcomes measured. It is unclear if ginger aromatherapy is beneficial for PONV. Details: Some individual clinical studies, as well as a large, recent meta-analysis of the available clinical research, show that taking ginger by mouth 1 hour prior to surgery does not reduce the incidence of 24-hour PONV (3452,3453,17369,99445). Also, the meta-analysis found that, although ginger reduces the severity of PONV when measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS), it does not reduce the severity of PONV when measured on a verbal descriptive scale (VDS). Furthermore, ginger does not reduce the use of rescue antiemetic medications (99445). However, some small, individual clinical studies and a meta-analysis of older clinical research show that taking ginger by mouth prior to surgery reduces the incidence of 24-hour PONV by up to 16% to 38% (722,723,1919,13237,20336,20338,20339). In addition, large clinical trials show that the frequency and severity of PONV 2-6 hours after surgery are similar when ginger 1 gram is given orally or when medications such as metoclopramide or dexmedetomidine are given intravenously prior to undergoing anesthesia (103356,103360). However, taking ginger prior to general anesthesia, in combination with other antiemetics like dexamethasone or cimetidine and metoclopramide, does not seem to reduce nausea and vomiting when compared with the other medications alone (20337,89890). In contrast, other research shows that powdered ginger 1-2 grams 30-60 minutes before induction of anesthesia has been used in most studies showing benefit, occasionally followed by 1 gram of ginger administered two hours after surgery (722,723,13237,20336,20338,103356,103360). Ginger aromatherapy has also been evaluated for the prevention of PONV. Application of 5% ginger essential oil to the wrists of patients prior to the induction of general anesthesia seems to prevent PONV in approximately 80% of treated patients (20334). Also, use of ginger essential oil aromatherapy on a gauze pad results in nausea relief in approximately 67% of patients compared with 40% in the placebo group; however, a blend of essential oils including ginger, spearmint, peppermint, and cardamom, results in nausea relief in 82% of patients (89888).These conflicting findings may be due to differences in outcome measures and the chemical compositions of ginger preparations used in the various clinical studies. Some evidence suggests that the efficacy of ginger for preventing PONV differs based on the formulation used. A network meta-analysis of 18 studies evaluating various ginger preparations, including ginger oil, ginger powder, ginger extract, and a combination of ginger powder and antiemetics, for the prevention of PONV suggests that ginger powder and ginger oil are the most effective formulations for preventing nausea and vomiting, respectively. The analysis also shows that while no ginger formulation is superior to another for the prevention of nausea, ginger powder and ginger oil have a lower risk of postoperative vomiting when compared with ginger extract. A subgroup analysis suggests that ginger seems to be most effective in adults over 30 years of age, when administered preoperatively, and when used for gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, obstetric, or ophthalmic surgeries (112108).
• Postoperative recovery. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for postoperative recovery. Details: One preliminary clinical study in adults who had a tonsillectomy shows that taking a specific ginger supplement (Solgar, Leonia) 500 mg twice daily for 7 days along with acetaminophen and antibiotics modestly improves pain and wound healing when compared with acetaminophen and antibiotics alone (96674).
• Postpartum complications. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial in patients with postpartum pain. Details: A small clinical study in patients recovering from vaginal delivery shows that taking ginger powder 500 mg 8-hours post-delivery, followed by 250 mg every 8 hours thereafter for 24 hours, reduces postpartum pain by nearly 1 point on a 10-point rating scale when compared with placebo (107904). It is unclear if this improvement would be considered clinically relevant.
• Radiation-induced nausea and vomiting. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial in patients with radiation-induced nausea and vomiting. Details: A very small study in adults with cervical cancer undergoing treatment with cisplatin and radiotherapy shows that taking ginger 250-500 mg twice daily for 6 weeks in addition to standard antiemetic therapy does not reduce acute or delayed nausea and vomiting when compared with antiemetic therapy alone (113616).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). One small clinical study suggests that oral ginger may improve some symptoms of RA. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with RA shows that taking ginger powder 1500 mg daily for 12 weeks improves disease activity on the Disease Activity Score-28 when compared with placebo (100697). Another small study in adults with RA shows that taking a combination product containing ginger, ashwagandha, black pepper, and colchicum luteum twice daily for 4 weeks does not improve RA disease scores when compared with celecoxib 100 mg orally twice daily (114785). However, the interpretation of these results is limited by. poor methodology, and the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Smoking cessation. Oral ginger has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in adults in India with a history of smoking 5 or more cigarettes daily for at least 3 years shows that taking a specific combination product containing ginger 50 mg, ashwagandha, cowhage, turmeric and other herbal extracts (Smotect, Smotect India) twice daily for 3 months reduces the number of cigarettes smoked by approximately 3 per day when compared with placebo. This product also reduces levels of alveolar carbon monoxide and carboxyhemoglobin but does not improve lung capacity (112115). However, only data from patients who completed treatment were analyzed, which limits the validity of this study. It is also unclear if these effects are due to ginger, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Swallowing dysfunction. The effects of oral ginger for treating swallowing dysfunction are inconclusive. Reasons for the conflicting findings may relate to the route of administration or the number of treatments provided. Details: Clinical research shows that applying a spray containing ginger and clematix root (Tongyan) to the oropharynx for 28 days is more effective than placebo at treating grade 2 or 3 dysphagia in stroke victims. However, there does not seem to be a beneficial effect in patients with grade 1 dysphagia (20342). Other clinical research in elderly patients with dysphagia shows that taking a single dose of ginger 2 mg orally does not improve swallowing but increases saliva (96671). It is possible that a single dose of ginger is not enough to improve swallowing function.
• Toxin-induced liver damage. Oral ginger might help to prevent liver damage in patients using antimycobacterial drugs. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that a specific ginger supplement (Zintoma, Goldaru) 500 mg taken 30 minutes prior to antimycobacterial drugs daily for 4 weeks reduces the percentage of patients experiencing an increase in liver function enzymes to greater than five times the upper limit of normal by 54% when compared with placebo. Antimycobacterial drugs used for tuberculosis in the study included isoniazid 5 mg/kg, rifampin 10 mg/kg, ethambutol 15 mg/kg, and pyrazinamide 25 mg/kg daily (96670).
• Traumatic brain injury (TBI). Oral ginger has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary research in young adults with subjective memory dysfunction associated with mild TBI, shows that taking a combination of ginger 36 mg and boswellia 360 mg (Memoral) every 8 hours orally for one month improves scores for some, but not all, parameters on an auditory-visual learning test performed at one and three months, when compared with placebo. Total learning scores increased by about 7.5 points with the ginger combination product, compared with 4 points for placebo (110132). It is unclear if these effects are due to ginger, boswellia, or the combination.
• Ulcerative colitis. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for improving symptoms of ulcerative colitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with ulcerative colitis shows that taking ginger powder 1000 mg twice daily for 12 weeks improves disease activity as measured by the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index Questionnaire when compared with taking placebo. However, taking ginger did not improve quality of life, stool frequency, bowel distress, or flatulence when compared with placebo (100694). It is possible that this study was not adequately powered to detect a difference in these secondary outcomes.
• Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). Although there has been interest in using oral ginger for various upper respiratory tract infections, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of ginger for this condition.
• Vertigo. It is unclear if oral ginger is beneficial for improving symptoms of vertigo. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking 1 gram of ginger orally as a single dose prior to stimulated vertigo seems to reduce symptoms of vertigo, including nausea, when compared with placebo. However, it does not seem to reduce nystagmus (7623). More evidence is needed to rate ginger for these uses.

(Read more about GINGER)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Constipation. Glucomannan is generally effective for treatment of constipation in adults, but the efficacy in children is less clear. Details: Clinical research in adults shows that taking glucomannan 1-1.5 grams three times daily orally for 3-5 weeks, sometimes followed by 1 gram twice daily for an additional 4 weeks, can relieve constipation. As a nonabsorbable dietary fiber, glucomannan appears to have a bulk laxative effect (11294,57783,57795,57816). Taking glucomannan 1.45 grams with lactulose 4.2 grams twice daily orally for 1-3 months appears to relieve constipation during pregnancy (57818). In children with constipation, glucomannan can increase the frequency of bowel movements but does not seem to improve stool consistency. A meta-analysis of 3 clinical trials including 122 children with functional constipation shows that glucomannan leads to 1.4 more stools per week but does not improve stool consistency when compared with placebo or a maltodextrin control (97935). Two studies included in this analysis show that taking a specific glucomannan supplement (Dicoplus, Dicofarm) 100 mg/kg once or twice daily (maximum daily dose 5 grams) along with fluids for up to 12 weeks relieves constipation in children (11295,57775). However, the other clinical study included in the analysis shows that taking a different glucomannan supplement (Dicoman Junior, Vitis Pharma) 1.26 grams twice daily for 4 weeks does not improve constipation in children (92005).
• Diabetes. Limited clinical research suggests that glucomannan may improve glycemic control and lipid profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes. Details: Taking glucomannan orally seems to reduce serum cholesterol and blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes (183,11357,11359,57791,57797,57798,112702). Most clinical research shows that a glucomannan dose of 3-15 grams daily for 4-12 weeks may reduce fasting blood glucose (183,11357,57791,57797,111225). Eating cookies containing glucomannan 0.5-0.7 grams per 100 kcal for 3 weeks has also been used (11358,11359,57797). Accordingly, a meta-analysis of 5 mostly small, low-quality clinical studies in adults with type 2 diabetes, that includes several of these studies, shows that taking glucomannan 1.2-15 grams daily for 4-16 weeks modestly improves fasting blood glucose when compared with placebo or wheat bran. This analysis also shows that taking glucomannan modestly improves 2-hour post-prandial glucose, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels but not triglycerides (112702). In healthy people, adding a specific glucomannan supplement (PolyGlycopleX, InovoBiologic Inc.) as granules, 2.5-7.5 grams before meals, or as capsules 3-6 grams with meals, can reduce the glycemic index of starchy foods (92003,92007). Also, taking this glucomannan product reduces postprandial glucose in a dose-dependent fashion in healthy people (92002,92007). However, the interpretation of this evidence is limited by low-quality research and variations in dosages and formulations.
• Hyperlipidemia. Most clinical research shows that glucomannan can reduce cholesterol levels in healthy people and those with hyperlipidemia. Details: Although some conflicting evidence exists (57794), most research shows that taking glucomannan orally can improve lipid levels in healthy adults, children and adults with hyperlipidemia, and adults with diabetes (178,11357,11358,11359,57779,57781,57784,57791,57799,97936)(112702). Meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking glucomannan 2.5-15.1 grams daily for up to 12 weeks can reduce total cholesterol by 19 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 13-16 mg/dL, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 12 mg/dL, and triglycerides by 11 mg/dL when compared with a control (57797,97936). Clinical research has not demonstrated a dose-response relationship, and the most common glucomannan doses are 5-10 grams daily for up to 6 weeks for adults and 2-3 grams daily in divided doses for up to 8 weeks for children (11358,11359,57797,97936).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Dumping syndrome. It is unclear if oral glucomannan is beneficial in patients with dumping syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking glucomannan (Propol, Pharmacia) 2.6 or 5.2 grams as a single dose reduces the incidence of reactive hypoglycemia following an oral glucose load in adult patients with previous gastric surgery (57805). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking glucomannan improves glucose tolerance, but not glucose absorption, in children experiencing gastric dumping syndrome after gastric surgery (57804).
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral glucomannan is beneficial in patients with hypertension. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with hypertension shows that eating cookies containing 0.7 grams of glucomannan per 100 kcal, for a total dose of up to 13 grams of glucomannan daily for 3 weeks, can lower systolic blood pressure by about 7% when compared with placebo (11359).
• Hyperthyroidism. It is unclear if oral glucomannan is beneficial in patients with hyperthyroidism. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with hyperthyroidism shows that taking glucomannan 1.3 grams twice daily orally, plus methimazole and propranolol for 2 months, reduces serum triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) levels during the first few weeks of therapy, when compared with methimazole and propranolol alone. However, these effects seem to diminish after 6 weeks of therapy (57793).
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral glucomannan is beneficial for metabolic syndrome. Details: A small crossover study in adults with metabolic syndrome, defined as impaired glucose tolerance, reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, elevated serum triglycerides, and moderate hypertension, shows that consuming biscuits containing glucomannan 0.5 grams per 100 kcal (equivalent to approximately 8-13 grams/day) daily for 3 weeks may modestly improve fasting glucose, but does not improve blood pressure or levels of triglycerides or HDL cholesterol when compared with wheat bran biscuits (11358). However, the 2-week washout period between interventions may be too short to detect differences in some outcomes.
• Obesity. Although some low-quality research shows that oral glucomannan is beneficial for achieving slight improvements in body weight, other research does not support this. Details: Meta-analyses of clinical research on the use of glucomannan for improving body weight and body composition in adults and children with overweight or obesity show mixed results, with one analysis suggesting that taking glucomannan reduces body weight by around 0.8 kg when compared with placebo (57797), and another showing no improvement in body weight (92014). Reasons for these discrepant findings are not clear, but the discrepancies may relate to differences in the study populations and dosing and duration of glucomannan treatment, as well as the low methodological quality of many studies conducted to date. Similar to the pooled analyses described above, individual clinical study results are also mixed. Several small clinical studies show that taking glucomannan can improve body weight, body mass index (BMI), fat mass, and other measures of body composition in children and adults with overweight or obesity, usually when used in combination with a calorie-restricted diet (180,181,182,183,54240,92008,92010,92011,111224,112701). However, conflicting evidence exists (179,57784,57790,57796,92009,112430). Doses that have been used with positive outcomes in adults are 3-4 grams daily, taken in divided doses, for up to 3 months (181,182,183,92008,112701). In children, doses were 2-3 grams daily for 4 months (180). Specific products evaluated include Propylene TM (Natural Alternatives International), PolyGlycopleX (InovoBiologic, Inc.) 3-5 grams 2-3 times daily for 15 weeks, and. Chrombalance 338 mg before each meal and 226 mg in the afternoon daily for 5 weeks (54240,92010,92011). More evidence is needed to rate glucomannan for these uses.

(Read more about GLUCOMANNAN)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Constipation. Oral guar gum may improve symptoms and stool frequency in adults and children with constipation. Details: Several small clinical studies in adults show that taking partially hydrolyzed guar gum increases stool frequency and relieves straining and pain when compared to baseline. Studied doses include 4-12 grams daily for up to 8 weeks or 11 grams twice daily for up to 3 weeks (12548,25073,93619). Small clinical studies in children with constipation also show that taking guar gum 3-5 grams daily for 4 weeks or partially hydrolyzed guar gum 6 grams daily for 2-15 months moderately increases bowel movement frequency and decreases abdominal pain when compared to baseline (93605,101889). While these improvements appear to be similar to those reported in children treated with lactulose (93605), a direct comparison is lacking.
• Diarrhea. Oral guar gum may reduce the duration of diarrhea in adults and children. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients in the intensive care unit show that adding guar gum 2% or 22 grams/L to enteral feeding formula reduces the number of liquid stools and decreases the percentage of days with diarrhea by around 70% when compared with control enteral formula (10325,54239). A larger clinical trial in children with acute watery diarrhea due to infections also shows that taking guar gum reduces the duration of diarrhea by around 16 hours when compared with a control (54210). Another clinical study in children with persistent watery diarrhea also shows that adding guar gum 20 grams/L daily for 7 days to a comminuted chicken diet improves the odds of diarrhea resolution after 7 days by 3-fold when compared with the chicken diet alone (54243).
• Hypercholesterolemia. Oral guar gum, taken alone or with other dietary fibers, may reduce cholesterol levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Details: Several small clinical trials in patients with hypercholesterolemia show that taking guar gum 15-18 grams in single or divided doses daily for up to 24 months lowers cholesterol levels when compared with baseline levels or placebo (4971,10897,54314,54318,54333). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 25 small clinical studies in patients with hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, hypertension, or metabolic syndrome shows that guar gum reduces total cholesterol by around 20 mg/dL and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by around 17 mg/dL, but does not reduce triglyceride levels, when compared with controls. Subgroup analyses suggest that improvements in total and LDL cholesterol are greater in patients with hypercholesterolemia and in those taking at least 15 grams of guar gum daily (107930). Additional clinical evidence shows that taking guar gum along with other dietary fibers can reduce cholesterol levels. Taking 20 grams of a mixture containing guar gum, pectin, and a small amount of the insoluble fibers from soy, pea, and corn bran daily for 36 weeks lowers total and LDL cholesterol, but does not affect high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol or triglyceride levels (12547,54335). Also, taking a specific product containing guar gum and psyllium (Minolest) 16.5 grams daily for 3 months reduces total and LDL cholesterol when compared with placebo, but does not affect triglyceride levels (54206). Taking 15 grams of a combination of guar gum, psyllium, pectin, and carob gum daily for 6 months also appears to reduce total and LDL cholesterol when compared to baseline (8431).
• Hypertension. Oral guar gum may modestly reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure, although these reductions may not be considered clinically significant. Details: Several small clinical trials in patients with hypertension show that taking guar gum 7-10 grams with each meal daily for up to 6 weeks modestly reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure when compared with placebo (54232,54304,54320). However, guar gum does not appear to be as effective for reducing blood pressure as psyllium husk (54260). A meta-analysis of clinical trials in adults also shows that taking guar gum 1-30 grams daily for 6 weeks to 6 months reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure by approximately 1 mmHg when compared with placebo or no intervention. However, many patients included in these trials did not have hypertension at baseline. Sub-analyses suggest that the effects of guar gum on blood pressure may be larger in patients with hypertension. The validity of this meta-analysis is limited by high heterogeneity (105507).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Oral guar gum may improve bowel function and abdominal pain in adults and children with IBS. Details: Clinical trials in adults with IBS show that taking guar gum 5-10 grams daily for 12 weeks improves abdominal pain, bowel function, and quality of life when compared with baseline or wheat bran (10326,54245). A small clinical study in children 8-16 years of age with chronic abdominal pain and IBS shows that taking partially hydrolyzed guar gum 5 grams daily for 4 weeks decreases symptom frequency and normalizes bowel movements when compared with placebo. However, it does not improve abdominal pain (93615). Another small clinical trial in children 1-18 years of age with IBS shows that taking a specific guar gum product (Resource Optifibre, Nestle HealthCare Nutrition) for at least 6-8 weeks improves stool consistency and abdominal pain when compared to baseline (93621).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Obesity. Oral guar gum may not improve body weight in patients with obesity. Details: Several small clinical trials in overweight or obese adults show that taking guar gum 10.5-20 grams in divided doses daily for up to 14 months does not reduce body weight or improve satiety when compared with placebo or other controls (54212,54260,54353,54360). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 11 small clinical studies of various patient populations, including postmenopausal adults and those with hyperlipidemia or diabetes, shows that taking guar gum 7.5-21 grams daily for 3 weeks to 6 months does not reduce body weight when compared with placebo (8305).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Anal fissures. It is unclear if oral guar gum is beneficial in patients with anal fissures. Details: A small clinical study in patients with chronic anal fissures treated with topical application of glyceryl trinitrate shows that taking partially hydrolyzed guar gum 5 grams daily as maintenance therapy for a total of 10 months increases success rate by 53% and decreases the risk for recurrence of anal fissures by 52% when compared with control (93617).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral guar gum is beneficial in children with autism spectrum disorder. Details: A very small clinical study in children 4-9 years of age with autism and constipation shows that taking partially hydrolyzed guar gum (Sunfiber, Taiyo Kagaku Co. Ltd.) 6 grams daily for 2-15 months moderately improves irritability, but not other measures of behavior, when compared to baseline (101889). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. It is unclear if oral guar gum is beneficial for the prevention or treatment of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Details: A clinical study in patients receiving 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy for colorectal cancer shows that adding guar gum (Novasource GI control, Novartis Nutrition) 11 grams daily on cycle days 7-14 for 24 weeks to treatment with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG does not reduce the rate of severe diarrhea or other abdominal complaints when compared with no treatment or L. rhamnosus GG alone (16736).
• Cholera. It is unclear if oral guar gum is beneficial for improving diarrhea in patients with cholera. Details: A small clinical study in adults with cholera treated with doxycycline shows that adding guar gum 25-50 grams to oral rehydration solution for 2 days does not reduce the duration of diarrhea, but might reduce stool weight over the first 24 hours, when compared with oral rehydration solution alone (54262).
• Cholestasis. Small clinical studies suggest that oral guar gum may not improve symptoms of cholestasis during pregnancy. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with cholestasis during pregnancy show that taking a specific granulated guar gum product (Guarem, Orion Pharmaceutical) 5-15 grams daily until delivery does not reduce the intensity of pruritus or improve liver function when compared with placebo (54209,54356).
• Diabetes. Small clinical studies suggest that oral guar gum might improve postprandial glucose levels in patients with type 1 diabetes; whether guar gum is effective for improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes is unclear. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with type 1 diabetes show that taking guar gum 5 grams with meals four times daily for 4-6 weeks lowers postprandial glucose levels when compared with placebo (10896,12545). However, clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes show conflicting results. Several very small clinical studies suggest that taking guar gum 5-7.6 grams with each meal daily for up to 48 weeks lowers blood glucose when compared with baseline levels or placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (12540,12541,12542,12543,12544). However, other small clinical trials in these patients show that taking guar gum 5-7 grams with each meal for up to 3 months does not improve glycemic control (54270,54275,54320,54326). The reasons for these discrepant findings are unclear; however, all of the studies in patients with type 2 diabetes were very small and likely underpowered to identify significant treatment effects. In addition to glycemic control, the effect of guar gum on serum lipids in patients with diabetes has also been evaluated. A meta-analysis of 11 small clinical studies in patients with type 2 diabetes with or without hypercholesterolemia shows that taking guar gum 5-30 grams daily for up to 6 months reduces total cholesterol by around 20 mg/dL and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by around 15 mg/dL. Doses of guar gum 20 grams daily or greater also appear to reduce triglyceride levels by around 13 mg/dL, while lower doses have no effect (107929).
• Influenza. It is unclear if oral guar gum is beneficial for the prevention of influenza. Details: Observational research in hospitalized patients has found that taking partially hydrolyzed guar gum 5.2 grams daily for the duration of a hospital stay is associated with a lower risk of influenza when compared with those not taking guar gum. One additional case of influenza appears to be prevented for every 14 patients taking guar gum over placebo (107928).
• Malnourishment-related diarrhea. It is unclear if oral guar gum is beneficial in children with malnourishment-related diarrhea. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 6-36 months with acute watery diarrhea related to malnutrition shows that adding guar gum 15 grams/L to oral rehydration solution reduces the duration of diarrhea by around 18 hours when compared with oral rehydration solution alone (93616).
• Postprandial hypotension. Small clinical studies suggest that oral guar gum may be beneficial for the prevention of postprandial hypotension in older females and patients with type 2 diabetes. Details: A small clinical study in older females with postprandial hypotension shows that taking guar gum 9 grams along with a meal decreases the risk of postprandial hypotension by 75% when compared with placebo (93618). Another small clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that taking guar gum 9 grams prior to a meal reduces the risk of postprandial decreases in blood pressure when compared to baseline (12540).
• Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). It is unclear if oral guar gum is beneficial in patients with SIBO. Details: A small clinical study in patients with SIBO shows that taking guar gum 5 grams daily along with rifaximin 1200 mg daily for 10 days increases the chance for eradication of SIBO by 37% to 40% when compared with rifaximin alone. However, overall clinical improvement appears to be similar for guar gum plus rifaximin and rifaximin alone (93622). More evidence is needed to rate guar gum for these uses.

(Read more about GUAR GUM)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Dental plaque. It is unclear if oral or topical gum arabic is beneficial for preventing or treating dental plaque. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that chewing gum arabic for 10 minutes, five times daily for 7 days, reduces dental plaque when compared with chewing sugar-free gum (30220). Another small clinical study in adults with mild or moderate plaque-induced gingivitis shows that applying half a teaspoon of gum arabic powder to the buccal surface of dentogingivial areas for 5 minutes then rinsing with tap water twice daily for 60 days reduces dental plaque in patients with moderate, but not high, plaque accumulation when compared with placebo (111508). Gum arabic has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients for this purpose. A small clinical study shows that applying a pea-size amount of gel containing gum arabic, barleria, medlar, terminalia, and melia (Gum Tone Gel, Charak Pharma Pvt Ltd.) after brushing for 6 weeks decreases plaque severity when compared with placebo. The gel is similar in effectiveness to chlorhexidine 1% gel (92887). However, it's unclear if these findings are due to gum arabic, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral gum arabic is beneficial in patients with diabetes. Details: Clinical research in adults with type 2 diabetes who are taking oral antidiabetes medications shows that taking gum arabic powder 30 grams daily in the morning for 3 months modestly reduces fasting blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) when compared with baseline. Gum arabic also modestly reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, body mass index, and hip circumference, but not waist circumference or blood pressure, when compared with baseline (98700,99098). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparison to the placebo group.
• Gingivitis. It is unclear if topical gum arabic is beneficial in patients with gingivitis. Details: A small clinical study in adults with mild or moderate plaque-induced gingivitis shows that applying half a teaspoon of gum arabic powder to the buccal surface of dentogingivial areas for 5 minutes then rinsing with tap water twice daily for 60 days reduces gingival inflammation in patients with mild, but not moderate, gingivitis when compared with placebo (111508). Another small clinical study in patients with chronic gingivitis shows that applying a pea-size amount of gel containing a mixture of ingredients including gum arabic, barleria, medlar, terminalia, and melia (Gum Tone Gel, Charak Pharma Pvt Ltd.) after brushing for 6 weeks decreases gingivitis severity when compared with placebo. The gel was no better than using chlorhexidine 1% gel (92887). However, it's unclear if these findings are due to gum arabic, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral gum arabic helps to reduce high cholesterol levels. Details: One small clinical study in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking gum arabic 5 grams twice daily for 4 weeks does not seem to affect plasma lipid levels when compared with baseline (8072).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Although there is interest in using oral gum arabic for IBS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of gum arabic for this condition.
• Kidney failure. Although there is interest in using oral gum arabic for kidney failure, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of gum arabic for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral gum arabic is beneficial for preventing metabolic syndrome. Details: One small clinical study in healthy adults at risk for metabolic syndrome shows that taking gum arabic 20 grams daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces blood pressure and increases fat-free mass when compared with baseline, but not when compared with taking pectin 1 gram. There were no changes in weight, glycated hemoglobin, or cholesterol levels (105039).
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral gum arabic is beneficial for promoting weight loss. Details: One small clinical study in healthy adults shows that taking powdered gum arabic 18 grams in the morning and 12 grams in the evening for 6 weeks reduces body mass index by 0.32 kg/m2 and body fat percentage by about 2% when compared with placebo. Body weight was also reduced by 1.2%, but this was not significant when compared with placebo (18237). It is unclear if gum arabic is beneficial in individuals with obesity.
• Peristomal lesions. It is unclear if topical gum arabic is beneficial for preventing peristomal lesions in patients with a colostomy bag. Details: Preliminary clinical research in infants shows that applying a thick layer of gum arabic gel to peristomal skin before attaching a colostomy bag twice daily for 4 weeks decreases the incidence of postoperative peristomal dermatitis by about 78% when compared with zinc sulfate ointment (92886).
• Sickle cell disease. It is unclear if oral gum arabic is beneficial in patients with sickle cell disease. Details: Preliminary clinical research in patients with sickle cell disease shows that taking gum arabic powder 30 grams daily for 12 weeks does not improve most markers of liver and kidney function in these patients. While an improvement in direct bilirubin levels was observed when compared to baseline, no significant changes in serum levels of total bilirubin, albumin, protein, liver enzymes, urea, or creatinine were reported (102087). However, in this same group of patients, gum arabic did reduce levels of total cholesterol by 8 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 5 mg/dL, and triglycerides by 12 mg/dL when compared with baseline. Significant improvements in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were lacking (102088). This research is limited by the lack of a control group, Also, it is unclear whether gum arabic can improve clinical outcomes in patients with sickle cell disease. More evidence is needed to rate the effectiveness of gum arabic for these uses.

(Read more about GUM ARABIC)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Constipation. Taking karaya gum orally seems to be effective for treating constipation when used as a bulk-forming laxative (6,11). There is insufficient reliable information available about the effectiveness of karaya gum for its other uses.

(Read more about KARAYA GUM)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Most research shows that oral Lactobacillus acidophilus, alone or in combination with other probiotics, seems to reduce the risk of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in adults. Details: A meta-analysis of 18 clinical trials in hospitalized or outpatient adults shows that taking L. acidophilus alone or in combination with up to 8 other probiotic strains reduces the risk of AAD by 34% when compared with taking placebo (107635). One small clinical trial in elderly adults shows that AAD occurred in 17% of those taking L. acidophilus (Florajen Acidophilus) 20 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) three times daily, compared with 37% of those taking placebo (95400). A number of combination products have also demonstrated benefit for preventing AAD, including Bio-K+ Cl1285 which provides L. acidophilus CL1285, Lacticaseibacillus casei LBC80R, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CLR2 as 100 billion CFUs daily (25494,95402,95403); L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (90239); and Ecologic AAD which provides L. acidophilus NIZO 3678 and NIZO 3887, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei NIZO 3672, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NIZO 3684, L. rhamnosus NIZO 3689, Ligilactobacillus salivarius NIZO 3675, Bifidobacterium bifidum NIZO 3804, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis NIZO 3680, and Enterococcus faecium NIZO 3886 (95405). However, some combination products have not demonstrated benefit. Clinical research shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus and bifidobacteria or a combination of L. acidophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (Lactinex) is not beneficial (90231,90239,92255,95385). An additional large clinical trial in children aged 3 months and up shows that taking L. acidophilus in combination with other probiotics does not reduce the risk of antibiotic-associated diarrhea when compared with taking placebo, when the more stringent definition is considered excluding diarrhea of other etiologies. However, the risk of diarrhea of any etiology is reduced by 35%. The probiotic supplement provided a total of 10 billion CFUs of L. acidophilus W37, Bifidobacterium bifidum W23, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis W51, Lactobacillus acidophilus W55, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei W20, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum W62, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus W71, and Ligilactobacillus salivarius W24 daily from the first day of antibiotic treatment until 7 days after treatment ended (110969).
• Bacterial vaginosis. Most clinical research shows that intravaginal application of Lactobacillus acidophilus may be helpful for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. It is unclear if oral L. acidophilus is beneficial for the treatment or prevention of bacterial vaginosis. Details: One clinical trial shows that intravaginal suppositories containing 100 million to 1 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of L. acidophilus (Vivag, Pharma Vinci A/S) given twice daily for 6 days improve bacterial vaginosis resolution rates when compared with placebo (13177). Another clinical trial shows that using 1-2 vaginal tablets containing viable L. acidophilus 10 million CFUs and estriol 0.03 mg per tablet (Gynoflor, Medinova) daily for 6 days increases cure rates when compared with placebo (13176). However, using this product in combination with metronidazole 400 mg twice daily for 7 days does not improve outcomes when compared with metronidazole alone (90237). Preliminary clinical research in patients with clinically defined bacterial vaginosis shows that daily intravaginal application with a douche providing L. acidophilus 1 billion CFUs per mL for 6 days might have beneficial effects on the vaginal flora. When compared with 52.5% of patients with bacterial vaginosis based on bacterial flora at baseline, 7.5% met this criteria 14 days after treatment had been completed (111788). Oral L. acidophilus has also been evaluated. Preliminary clinical research shows that eating yogurt 125 mL daily enriched with L. acidophilus for 2 months might slightly decrease the incidence of recurrent bacterial vaginosis (1245). L. acidophilus has also been investigated in an oral formulation in combination with other probiotics. Clinical research in patients with bacterial vaginosis cured within the past 48 hours shows that taking a product containing L. acidophilus in combination with other probiotics results in recurrence of vaginosis in 18.3% of patients, a statistically significant reduction compared with 32.1% of those using placebo. The mean time to recurrence was approximately 23 days longer in patients taking the lactobacilli. The product contained L. acidophilus 1.08 billion CFUs along with Lactobacillus crispatus LMG S-29995 and Levilactobacillus brevis (Lactogyn, Vésale Pharma, Belgium), and was taken twice daily for 7 days and then once daily for up to an additional 120 days (110950).
• Helicobacter pylori. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus, usually in combination with other probiotics, seems to improve H. pylori eradication when used along with standard therapies. It is unclear if heat-killed L. acidophilus is beneficial for H. pylori eradication. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical studies utilizing probiotic products containing L. acidophilus shows that these products can improve H. pylori eradication rates 1.14- to 1.24-fold when taken in combination with triple therapy consisting of a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin, and amoxicillin. Based on these results, about 7-11 patients would need to be treated in order for one additional patient to achieve complete remission (95394). Only one of the trials in this analysis investigated L. acidophilus alone; an additional 8 used L. acidophilus in combination with other probiotics. Individual clinical trials have shown that a combination of L. acidophilus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Bacillus subtilis 30 million colony-forming units (CFUs) total, taken in three divided doses daily, from 2 weeks prior tol 2 weeks after triple therapy increases H. pylori eradication when compared with triple therapy alone (90248). In children, a combination of L. acidophilus (strain 5) 94 million CFUs and Bifidobacterium bifidum (strain 12) 8.6 million CFUs in combination with a PPI, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin or metronidazole has been used daily for 2 weeks, followed by the probiotics alone for an additional 4 weeks (90602). However, other individual clinical trials have shown that L. acidophilus in combination with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Streptococcus faecium may not improve eradication rates when taken with triple therapy consisting of furazolidone, tetracycline, and lansoprazole (90279). Also, taking L. acidophilus along with six other probiotics in conjunction with bismuth quadruple therapy does not seem to improve H. pylori eradication rates when compared with placebo and bismuth quadruple therapy (90291). Also, taking L. acidophilus and L. casei without any standard H. pylori therapy does not improve H. pylori eradication rates in adults (12766). Heat-killed L. acidophilus has also been investigated in adults with H. pylori. Taking a lyophilized and inactivated culture of L. acidophilus (Lacteol Fort) containing 5 billion cells, 3 times daily for 10 days, modestly increases the eradication rate in patients using triple therapy of rabeprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin for 7 days (8562).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Some research shows that oral live Lactobacillus acidophilus, taken alone or in combination with other probiotics, may be beneficial for IBS. The effects of non-viable, heat-killed L. acidophilus are unclear. Details: Clinical research in adults with IBS shows that taking L. acidophilus DDS-1 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 6 weeks modestly reduces the severity of abdominal pain when compared with placebo. Also, 52% of patients experienced a more than 30% reduction in pain severity, compared with 16% of those taking placebo. There were also improvements in abdominal distention and duration of pain; however, there were no changes in bowel habits (107581). A meta-analysis shows that taking L. acidophilus improves the rate of symptom relief and reduces bloating severity when compared with placebo. However, other symptoms were not improved (110866). L. acidophilus has also been examined in combination with other probiotics. One clinical study shows that taking a specific combination product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) containing L. acidophilus and 7 other species as 450 billion CFUs daily in two divided doses for 8 weeks improves abdominal bloating, but not abdominal pain, flatulence, or number of stools, in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) (11379). Another clinical study in patients with IBS-D shows that taking a specific multi-species probiotic (NordBiotic, MBM Biotix) containing L. acidophilus LA120, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LR110, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei LPC100, Lacticaseibacillus casei LC130, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP140, Bifidobacterium breve BB010, Bifidobacterium longum BL020, Bifidobacterium bifidum BF030, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BL040, and Streptococcus thermophilus ST250 as 2.5 billion CFUs total twice daily for 8 weeks improves overall symptom severity, as well as pain severity, pain frequency, and quality of life, when compared with placebo. Symptom severity was rated as mild by approximately 60% of those taking the probiotic mixture, compared with 30% of those taking placebo (107516). A small clinical trial shows that taking L. acidophilus NCFM plus Lactobacillus helveticus Lafti L10 (Lallemand Health Solutions) 5 billion CFUs each daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces flatus and overall symptoms, but not abdominal pain or bloating, when compared with taking placebo (111785). However, other probiotic compounds containing L. acidophilus have not demonstrated benefit in most patients with IBS. These include L. acidophilus NCFM 10 billion CFUs daily for 12 weeks; L. acidophilus, L. paracasei, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 (Cultura) 13-20 billion CFUs daily for 6 months; or L. acidophilus CL1285, L. casei LBC80R, and L. rhamnosus CLR2 50 billion CFUs each daily for 3 months (90236,94696,94697,95365,99789). Further research is needed to determine which IBS subtype, if any, is most likely to benefit. Heat-killed L. acidophilus has also been investigated in patients with IBS. One clinical study shows that taking capsules containing heat-killed L. acidophilus (Lacteol Fort) 20 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 6 weeks improves abdominal pain, bloating, and number and quality of stools when compared with placebo (7744). Also, in patients with IBS-D, observational research has found that use of heat-killed L. acidophilus (Lacteol LB) two capsules daily for one month modestly reduces pain and bloating and improves quality of life. The average weekly number of stools decreased by approximately 4.75. Also, the number of patients with watery stools was reduced from 54% at baseline to 19% (107535).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Atopic disease. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus does not seem to be beneficial for preventing atopic disease in children. Details: A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that administering L. acidophilus during pregnancy, when breastfeeding, or to newborn infants might actually increase the risk of atopic sensitization (90251). However, the number of studies included in this analysis was limited.

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A preliminary clinical study shows that taking a specific probiotic product containing L. acidophilus 5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus 5 billion CFUs, and Bifidobacterium bifidum 20 billion CFUs (Trenev Trio/Healthy Trinity, Natren) twice daily along with minocycline once every evening for 12 weeks improves inflamed and non-inflamed acne lesions in 82% of patients, compared to only 67% of patients treated with either the probiotic combination or minocycline alone (90270).
• Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in premature infants shows that taking 6 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus NCDO 1748 and Bifidobacterium bifidum NCDO 2203 (UFC Inforan, Switzerland) from 7 days of age until 34 weeks postmenstrual age or discharge does not reduce the odds of ARDS when compared with a control group of infants not given these probiotics. The infants in this study were born at less than 32 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111794). This study is limited by the lack of randomization to treatment group; placement was based on year of birth.
• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for allergic rhinitis prevention or treatment. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis shows that taking heat-treated milk fermented with L. acidophilus L-92 100 mL daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces nasal symptoms and mucus, but not ocular symptoms, when compared with taking an acidified placebo milk. The milk provided approximately 30 billion L. acidophilus cells (25488). The effect of L. acidophilus as a probiotic is unclear from this study. Other clinical research shows that drinking 250 mL of fermented milk containing L. acidophilus La-5 5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG 50 billion CFUs, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 50 billion CFUs from 36 weeks' gestation until 3 months postpartum does not reduce the incidence of allergic rhinitis in the child at 6 years of age when compared with placebo milk (96893).
• Asthma. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus can improve lung function in people with asthma. Details: A small clinical crossover study in patients with moderate asthma shows that consuming live active yogurt 225 grams, providing L. acidophilus 760 million colony-forming units (CFUs) per gram, twice daily for 1 month does not affect measures of lung function when compared with yogurt not containing L. acidophilus. All yogurt contained Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (1244).
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A meta-analysis of the available clinical research shows that intake of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria-based probiotics during gestation, followed by giving the probiotic to the newborn for the first 2-6 months of life, reduces the risk of developing atopic dermatitis by 40% over the next 6-24 months when compared with placebo, regardless of family history of atopy. However, only four of 10 studies included in the analysis used L. acidophilus as part of the probiotic combination; the results from these individual, small studies support the overall findings of the meta-analysis (107503). Some clinical research also shows that supplementation with 250 mL of fermented milk containing L. acidophilus La-5, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 starting at 36 weeks' gestation and continuing until 3 months' postpartum, without supplementation in the infant, reduces the overall occurrence of atopic dermatitis in the child at 2 years of age. However, at 6 years of age, the effect appears to be inconclusive (96893). In children ages 1-3 years with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, taking 5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of a combination of L. acidophilus DDS-1 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis UABLA-12 along with fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) (DDS Junior) twice daily for 8 weeks modestly reduces symptom severity and the need for topical corticosteroids when compared with placebo (110995).
• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One large observational study in premature infants suggests that taking L. acidophilus 1 to 3 billion CFUs with Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis during the first month of life for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis was not associated with a reduced risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The infants in this study were born between 22-29 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111771).
• Cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for cancer prevention or treatment, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
• Canker sores. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A systematic review and meta-analysis of mainly small and preliminary clinical trials shows that taking lactobacilli probiotics has a small effect on pain from canker sores. However, the dose and duration of probiotic and the specific species, as well as endpoints and results from individual studies, are mixed. One small study shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis reduces pain, but not the number of lesions or healing time, when compared with placebo. Another study shows that using lozenges providing inulin 0.13 gram along with L. acidophilus and B. animalis subsp. lactis 1.5 billion colony-forming units each reduces pain, but does not affect ulcer size or healing, when compared with Oracure gel (105146). Many of the individual studies may have been underpowered to detect a difference between groups.
• Cholestasis. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in premature infants shows that the risk of developing cholestasis is reduced from 22% to 6% in those given a blend of L. acidophilus, bifidobacteria, and Enterococcus faecalis (Peifeikang powder, Shanghai Xinyi Pharmaceutical Company) at least 5 million colony-forming units three times daily, from birth until implementation of total parenteral nutrition, when compared with infants not given this powder. In the infants that developed cholestasis, the severity was reduced, resulting in a reduction in the rate of cholestatic liver injury, feeding intolerance, and necrotizing enterocolitis. The number of days to reach full enteral feeding, days to normal weight gain, and days of hospitalization were reduced by approximately 2.8, 2.1, and 1.7 days, respectively (103448).
• Clostridioides difficile infection. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for preventing C. difficile occurrence or recurrence. Details: Current guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) state that there is insufficient information to recommend administration of probiotics for the primary prevention of C. difficile-associated diarrhea (107538). Evidence from clinical and observational research investigating the effect of L. acidophilus on C. difficile occurrence or recurrence is weak. Most studies use this species in combination with one or more additional probiotic species, including as Bio-K+ CI1285, containing L. acidophilus CL1285 and L. casei LBC80R, and as Bio-K+ 50 Billion, containing L. acidophilus CL1285, Lacticaseibacillus casei LBC80R, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CLR2 (25494,90231,90934,95369,95403,107529). Observational research has found that providing the Bio-K+ 50 Billion product as 50-100 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 5 days to patients who are on antibiotics for at least 2 days reduces the hospital-wide incidence of C. difficile by approximately 40%. The incidence rate was decreased by at least 50% in the highest risk individuals taking this combination (107529).
• Colic. Oral inactivated Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One clinical study in infants with colic shows that giving a specific multi-ingredient product (Colimil Plus, Milte Italia SPA) containing inactivated L. acidophilus 1 billion colony-forming units, lemon balm 65 mg, and German chamomile 9 mg twice daily for 4 weeks reduces crying time similarly to Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 100 million CFUs daily (96278). It is unclear how L. acidophilus compares with no treatment.
• Common cold. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in school children shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum (Infloran, Berna) 1 billion colony-forming units each twice daily for 3 months reduces the absolute percentage of school absence due to cold symptoms by 30% when compared with placebo (90286).
• Constipation. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that stool frequency is increased and symptoms of functional constipation in adults are improved with the use of a specific combination product (Hexbio) providing L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis 30 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) twice daily for 7 days (90266). However, most other probiotic compounds containing L. acidophilus have not demonstrated benefit in most patients with constipation. One small clinical trial shows that taking yogurt 180 mL providing L. acidophilus NCFM, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019, and polydextrose (Litesse) daily for 2 weeks modestly improves clinical response and reduces transit time when compared with taking a control yogurt. However, there was no effect on the number of daily bowel movements (90275). Other studies show that taking Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 6.6 billion CFUs daily for 4 weeks in combination with Bifidobacterium longum UABl-14, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis UABla-12, Bifidobacterium bifidum UABb-10, and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) 7 mg does not improve symptoms of constipation when compared with a placebo providing FOS (110970). Also, there was a general lack of support for symptom improvement following the intake of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM 10 billion CFUs daily with Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Lpc-37 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis strains Bl-04, Bi-07, and HN019 daily for 2 weeks (110979).
• Critical illness (trauma). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in critically ill, hospitalized adults shows that taking L. acidophilus LA-5 1.75 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 500 million CFUs, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB12 1.75 billion CFUs, and Saccharomyces boulardii 1.5 billion CFUs twice daily for 15 days modestly reduces the risk of sepsis, as well as the length of stay in the ICU and hospital, when compared with placebo (107524).
• Denture stomatitis. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for denture stomatitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
• Depression. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with major depression shows that taking L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum daily for 8 weeks reduces symptoms of depression measured on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) when compared with placebo (99780). However, the validity of the results from this study is limited by incomplete reporting. For example, patient baseline BDI scores were not reported.
• Diabetes. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus in combination with other probiotic species seems to be beneficial for the treatment of gestational diabetes, although it is unclear if it is beneficial for treatment of type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Oral L. acidophilus is unlikely to be beneficial for the prevention of gestational diabetes. Details: Although some individual studies disagree, meta-analyses of clinical research in patients with gestational diabetes show that taking probiotics, most often L. acidophilus in combination with other species, improves glycemic indices such as fasting blood glucose and insulin sensitivity when compared with placebo (102288,104156). Also, one meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking probiotics specifically containing L. acidophilus in combination with other species modestly improves these glycemic indices, as well as levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides, but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (111796). Some doses used in available studies include a combination of freeze-dried L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum each as 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) per gram daily for 6 weeks (95416,98430), a total of 4 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus LA-5, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12, Streptococcus thermophilus STY-31, and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus LBY-27 for 8 weeks starting at 24-28 weeks' gestation (96892), and a specific product containing L. acidophilus and 7 other probiotics (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) as a total of 112.5 billion CFUs twice daily for 8 weeks (107549). Meta-analyses in patients with gestational diabetes show that taking probiotics such as L. acidophilus does not reduce the risk for caesarean section birth, neonatal hypoglycemia, large for gestational age birth, or hypertensive disorders such as pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, or eclampsia (102288,104156,111796). However, one meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking probiotics specifically containing L. acidophilus modestly reduces neonatal birth weight, but not maternal weight gain (111796). Taking L. acidophilus does not seem to be effective for PREVENTING gestational diabetes. A large clinical trial shows that taking L. acidophilus LA1 7.5 billion CFUs, Bifidobacterium longum sp54 cs 1.5 billion CFUs, and Bifidobacterium bifidum sp9 cs 6 billion CFUs daily from 14-24 weeks' gestation does not reduce the incidence of gestational diabetes when compared with taking placebo (107520). Research on the use of L. acidophilus for type 2 diabetes is mixed. Taking a combination of L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Streptococcus thermophilus daily for 12 weeks does not reduce levels of fasting blood glucose or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) when compared with placebo (107521). One clinical study shows that taking L. acidophilus along with six other probiotic strains (Familact) daily for 6 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose, but does not affect plasma insulin, when compared with placebo (99790). A small clinical trial shows that taking fermented goat milk 120 grams containing one billion CFUs each of L. acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 daily for 6 weeks modestly reduces levels of HbA1c and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, but not fasting blood glucose or insulin resistance, when compared with conventional fermented milk containing Streptococcus thermophilus TA-40 (110973). However, other clinical research shows that taking L. acidophilus 1 billion CFUs, along with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Bacillus coagulans GanedenBC30 (GBI-30, 6086), and fructo-oligosaccharides 500 mg daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces fasting blood glucose and insulin and improves measures of insulin resistance when compared with placebo (107731). Another clinical trial shows that taking yogurt 200 grams daily containing L. acidophilus 4.65 million CFUs per gram along with Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis modestly reduces levels of HbA1c, triglyceride, and LDL cholesterol, but not fasting glucose, when compared with a placebo yogurt (111798). A combination probiotic containing L. acidophilus has also been evaluated in children 2-12 years of age with new-onset type 1 diabetes. One clinical study shows that taking a specific combination product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) providing 112.5 billion CFUs daily for 3 months modestly decreases HbA1c and insulin requirements when compared with placebo. Also, about three times as many children achieved remission, defined as insulin requirements of less than 0.5 U/kg daily and HbA1c less than 7%. However, C-peptide levels and the maintenance of residual pancreatic beta-cell function were not affected when compared with placebo (107497).
• Diabetic nephropathy. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with diabetic nephropathy not taking antidiabetes drugs shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Streptococcus thermophilus daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces the ratio of microalbuminuria/creatinine (mAlb/Cr), a marker of kidney damage, when compared with placebo. However, there was no effect on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (107521).
• Diarrhea. Oral heat-killed L. acidophilus seems to reduce the duration of diarrhea in adults and children. Oral live L. acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children with dysentery being treated with ceftriaxone shows that taking a specific combination probiotic sachet (Kidilact, Zisttakhmir Company) containing live L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, Bifidobacterium breve, and Streptococcus thermophilus daily for 5 days modestly reduces the duration of diarrhea, hospitalization, and blood in diarrhea when compared with control (102417). Heat-killed L. acidophilus has also been investigated for the treatment of diarrhea. A meta-analysis of four small clinical studies in infants and children ages 1 month to 4 years shows that taking heat-killed L. acidophilus LB 20-30 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for up to 5 days along with oral or intravenous rehydration therapy can modestly reduce the duration of diarrhea, primarily of non-rotaviral origin (90295). Also, preliminary clinical research in patients with functional chronic diarrhea shows that taking heat-killed L. acidophilus LB (Lacteol Fort, Laboratoire du Lacteol du Dr Boucard) as two capsules twice daily for a total of 20 billion cells daily for 4 weeks reduces daily stool frequency by 3.5, compared with a reduction of 1.2 in patients taking five chewable capsules three times daily of an unspecified strain of L. acidophilus (Lacidophilin, Tai Ge Pharma Ltd). Stool consistency, pain, distention, and total efficacy, defined as a decrease in mean symptoms by at least 40%, were also further improved in patients taking the heat-killed product (107537). However, other clinical research in children ages 6 months to 12 years hospitalized with acute diarrhea shows that taking 15 billion heat-killed L. acidophilus (Lactrol, Raptakos) cells daily for 3 days along with oral rehydration solution (ORS) does not have beneficial effects on duration of diarrhea, frequency of stools, or length of hospital stay, when compared with ORS alone (111789). The European Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases recommends probiotics in hospitalized children with diarrhea (98469) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommends probiotics for the outpatient treatment of acute diarrhea (95388) However, L. acidophilus is not a specific focus of the guidelines and most evidence is low quality.
• Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients newly diagnosed with GAD shows that taking sertraline 25 mg plus probiotics daily for 8 weeks may modestly reduce some symptoms of anxiety when compared with sertraline alone. However, the reduction in anxiety score was small and change was not consistent between rating scales. Also, the quality of life was not improved. The probiotics provided a total of 18 billion colony-forming units of L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (110977).
• Hepatic encephalopathy. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for hepatic encephalopathy, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
• HIV/AIDS. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for HIV/AIDS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
• Hypercholesterolemia. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for lowering cholesterol levels; the available research is conflicting. Details: Two meta-analyses of clinical research show that taking fermented milk products containing L. acidophilus can reduce total cholesterol by about 14-19 mg/dL in adults with or without hypercholesterolemia. However, the effect of L. acidophilus on both total and LDL cholesterol levels is conflicting from available research (95396,95397,95399). Clinical trials included in these meta-analyses evaluated patients with hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), metabolic syndrome, and others. Taking L. acidophilus does not appear to improve high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol or triglyceride levels (95396,95397,95399). Doses used in some studies have included fermented milk products providing L. acidophilus 39 million to 2 billion CFUs daily, alone or along with other probiotic species, for up to 6 weeks (95396). One small clinical trial in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking L. acidophilus LA-1 60 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) three times daily for 6 weeks does not affect serum lipids when compared with taking placebo (111791). A meta-analysis of nine small to moderate-sized clinical studies shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis reduces levels of total cholesterol when compared with placebo (107591). However, it is unclear if this is due to L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, or their combination.
• Hypertension. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for hypertension, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small preliminary clinical trial in patients with collagenous colitis shows that taking 10 billion colony-forming units each of L. acidophilus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. lactis BB-12 twice daily for 12 weeks does not increase the proportion of patients with a reduction in weekly bowel frequency of at least 50% when compared with placebo. Also, there was no effect of this combination on stool consistency or abdominal symptoms. However, there were some modest benefits when compared with baseline (110999). This study was small and may have been underpowered to detect differences.
• Intraventricular hemorrhage. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in premature infants shows that taking 6 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus NCDO 1748 and Bifidobacterium bifidum NCDO 2203 (UFC Inforan, Switzerland) from 7 days of age until 34 weeks postmenstrual age or discharge does not reduce the odds of intraventricular hemorrhage when compared with a control group of infants not given these probiotics. The infants in this study were born at less than 32 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111794). This study is limited by the lack of randomization to treatment group; placement was based on year of birth.
• Lactose intolerance. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for lactose intolerance. Details: One small clinical trial shows that consuming 400 mL of a non-fermented milk product containing L. acidophilus 530 million colony-forming units (CFUs)/mL daily does not reduce symptoms of lactose intolerance or hydrogen breath test results when compared with milk without L. acidophilus (16737). Another small preliminary clinical trial shows that taking L. acidophilus BG2FO4 10 billion CFUs twice daily for 7 days does not reduce lactose-induced gastrointestinal symptoms or improve lactose digestion based on breath hydrogen when compared with baseline (111783). However, another clinical trial shows that adding various L. acidophilus strains 800 million to 1 billion CFUs/mL to non-fermented milk improves hydrogen breath tests in patients with lactose intolerance (16738).
• Lyme disease. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of L. acidophilus for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in elderly patients with metabolic syndrome shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus PBS066-DSM 24,936, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum PBS067-DSM 24,937, and Limosilactobacillus reuteri PBS072-DSM 25,175 as 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) each, with inulin and fructo-oligosaccharides daily for 60 days, reduces the number of patients diagnosed with metabolic syndrome by 23%, compared with a 10% reduction in those taking placebo. In the probiotic group, there were modest improvements in waist circumference and levels of fasting plasma insulin, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and inflammatory mediators when compared with placebo. However, there were no significant differences between groups for fasting blood glucose or blood pressure. All patients in this study were on a Mediterranean-like standard diet (107560).
• Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial or safe for NEC prevention. Details: Most meta-analyses of clinical research show that giving lactobacilli enterally reduces the risk of NEC and/or severe NEC in preterm, mainly very low birth weight (VLBW), infants. Some meta-analyses support the use of lactobacilli in combination with bifidobacteria, as opposed to lactobacilli alone for reducing the risk of NEC. However, only a small number of the individual studies included in these analyses have investigated the effects of L. acidophilus, which was used as part of a combination probiotic and/or prebiotic product in all cases (95344,95351,103437,103445,104157,105162,105164). Also, guidance among regulatory agencies and clinical organizations varies with respect to the use of probiotics in very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns that preterm infants given probiotics are at risk of serious infections caused by the bacteria or fungi contained in probiotics due to cases reported in this group of infants (111610). Also, The American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to preterm infants, particularly those with a birth weight below 1000 grams, due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy and potential for harm in this vulnerable population (111608). The Canadian Paediatric Society, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition state that probiotic combinations may be of benefit in reducing the incidence of NEC in preterm neonates over 1000 grams. However, L. acidophilus is not specifically recommended (103003,111609,111611).
• Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In children with NAFLD, clinical research shows that taking a specific combination product (Prokid, Gostaresh Milad Pouya Company) containing L. acidophilus ATCC B3208 3 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus DSMZ 21690 2 billion CFUs, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis DSMZ 32269 6 billion CFUs, and Bifidobacterium bifidum ATCC SD6576 2 billion CFUs daily for 12 weeks normalizes liver sonography findings in 53% of children, compared with 17% of those taking placebo. In addition, levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) are reduced by 30% and 25%, respectively. There was no effect on body mass index or blood lipids when compared with placebo (105156). Another clinical trial shows that taking two sachets daily for 3 months of a specific combination product (VSL#3) containing L. acidophilus and other probiotics modestly decreases triglyceride levels and liver enzymes when compared with taking placebo. However, there was no change in body mass index or most glycemic or lipid parameters (111009). However, taking L. acidophilus in combination with other probiotics does not seem to be beneficial in adults with NAFLD. Clinical research shows that taking yogurt 100 grams, containing L. acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12 40 million CFUs and vitamin D 1000 IU, daily for 3 months does not improve fasting blood glucose levels, insulin levels, blood pressure, or anthropometric indices when compared with unfortified yogurt (105174). Also, a small clinical trial shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus BCMC 12,130, Lacticaseibacillus casei BCMC 12,313, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis BCMC 12,451, Bifidobacterium bifidum BCMC 02290, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis BCMC 02129, and Bifidobacterium longum BCMC 02120 30 billion colony-forming units twice daily for 6 months has no beneficial effects on hepatic steatosis or fibrosis or on levels of liver enzymes, blood lipids, or fasting glucose, when compared with placebo (107523).
• Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in patients with NASH shows that taking 1 billion colony-forming units each of L. acidophilus ATCC SD5221 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019 daily for 6 months does not have beneficial effects on severity of liver fibrosis or steatosis, metabolic markers, or inflammation when compared with taking placebo. The effect of this combination on liver enzymes was mixed (111797).
• Obesity. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In combination with Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BS01, taking L. acidophilus LA02 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) daily for 6 weeks does not reduce body weight or body fat when compared with placebo in young, healthy females, only some of whom were overweight (103438). However, another clinical study shows that taking 50 billion CFUs of a specific combination of L. acidophilus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and B. animalis subsp. lactis (Lab4P) for 24 weeks reduces body weight by an additional 1.3 kg more than placebo (103439).
• Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In patients with PCOS, clinical research shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus T16 (IBRC-M10785), Lacticaseibacillus casei T2 (IBRC-M10783), and Bifidobacterium bifidum T1 (IBRC-M10771) 2 billion colony-forming units each, plus inulin 800 mg, daily for 12 weeks modestly reduces serum insulin and triglyceride levels and improves insulin resistance and insulin sensitivity when compared with placebo. However, it does not alter cholesterol or fasting glucose levels (105159). Another clinical trial shows that 31.3% of patients with PCOS taking L. acidophilus in combination with other probiotics daily for 6 months had regular menstrual cycles compared with 12.5% of those taking placebo. There were also modest improvements in testosterone levels and waist circumference, but not other hormones, insulin resistance, body weight, or most measures of quality of life. The product provided Lactobacillus acidophilus UBLA-34 2 billion CFUs along with Bifidobacterium bifidum UBBB-55, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum UBLP-40, Lacticaseibacillus casei UBLC-42, Limosilactobacillus fermentum UBLF-31, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus UBLR-58, Limosilactobacillus reuteri UBLRu-87, and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) daily for 2 months and then twice daily for 4 months. All patients also underwent dietary and lifestyle changes (110974).
• Postoperative infection. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for preventing postoperative infections, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lactobacillus for this purpose.
• Pouchitis. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Continuous oral treatment for one year with a specific concentrated formulation of L. acidophilus and other probiotics (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) as 6 grams (300-500 billion live bacteria per gram), daily for up 12 months seems to maintain remission of pouchitis in 85% of patients (6087,12769). Also, one small clinical study shows that taking a specific product (Trilac, Allergon AB) containing L. acidophilus 600 million colony-forming units (CFUs) per capsule, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus 400 million CFUs per capsule, and Bifidobacterium bifidum 600 million CFUs per capsule, taken in doses of two capsules three times daily for 9 months, can reduce pouchitis severity and the number of patients experiencing pouchitis when compared to baseline (90296). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small preliminary clinical trial shows that taking probiotics during pregnancy reduces the severity and duration of nausea and vomiting by 16% to 54%. There was also a small benefit on stool hardness. A specific probiotic (Probiotics 10, Nature's Bounty) was taken as 2 capsules daily for two back-to-back cycles of six days with probiotics and two days without. Each capsule contained a total of 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of L. acidophilus La-14, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 299v and DSM 15312, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus Lb-87, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei DSM 13434 and Lpc-37, Ligilactobacillus salivarius Ls-33, Levilactobacillus brevis Lbr-35, Lacticaseibacillus casei Lc-11, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bl-04, along with inulin 200 mg (107199).
• Prematurity. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In premature infants, clinical research shows that taking a blend of L. acidophilus, bifidobacteria, and Enterococcus faecalis (Peifeikang powder, Shanghai Xinyi Pharmaceutical Company), at least 5 million colony-forming units (CFUs) three times daily from birth until implementation of total parenteral nutrition, reduces the rate of development of extrauterine growth retardation from 15% to 8% when compared with those not receiving this blend (103448). Other preliminary clinical research in premature infants shows that taking 6 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus NCDO 1748 and Bifidobacterium bifidum NCDO 2203 (UFC Inforan, Switzerland) from 7 days of age until 34 weeks postmenstrual age or discharge reduces the odds of neurodevelopment impairment at 24 months corrected age by 70% when compared with a control group of infants not given these probiotics. The odds of having moderate to severe impairment were also reduced. The infants in this study were born at less than 32 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111794). This study is limited by the lack of randomization to treatment group; placement was based on year of birth. Observational research has also been conducted. One large observational study in infants fed strictly human milk, but not strictly formula or a combination, suggests that taking L. acidophilus 1 to 3 billion CFUs with Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis during the first month of life for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis was associated with a modest increased weight gain velocity. The infants in this study were born between 22-29 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111771).
• Psoriasis. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with psoriasis shows that taking a mixture of probiotics for 8 weeks modestly improves overall symptoms and feelings of depression when compared with placebo. The percentage of patients achieving at least a 50% or 75% reduction in overall symptom score was 40% and 24%, respectively, in those taking the probiotic mixture, compared with 16% and 8% of those taking placebo. Each probiotic capsule was used twice daily and provided a total daily dose of 2.6 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) of L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, and Bifidobacterium longum (107498).
• Radiation-induced diarrhea. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with cervical cancer receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy shows that taking a specific product (Biogurt, Fame Pharmaceuticals) containing L. acidophilus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 as 1.75 billion lyophilized colony-forming units (CFUs) as a capsule three times daily throughout treatment reduces the risk of diarrhea by 28% when compared with placebo. The treatment group also used less loperamide (102285). Another small clinical trial in patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy with weekly cisplatin shows that taking L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum (Infloran, Laboratio Farmaceutico SIT) as 1 billion CFUs each, twice daily from seven days before starting radiotherapy and continuing during radiotherapy, reduces the incidence of moderate to severe diarrhea and the need for antidiarrheal medication when compared with placebo. Moderate to severe diarrhea occurred in 9% of patients using the probiotics, compared with 45% of those taking placebo (107580).
• Respiratory tract infections. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in children ages 3-5 years who attend daycare centers shows that taking a combination milk product containing 5 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) each of L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis (HOWARU Protect, Danisco) reduces the risk of experiencing fever, cough, and rhinorrhea by 45% when compared with placebo. Patients taking this combination experienced an average 2-day shorter duration of symptoms and were significantly less likely to use an antibiotic for their symptoms. Patients who took L. acidophilus without bifidobacterium also had a reduction in fever, cough, and use of antibiotics, but not rhinorrhea (16847). In healthy children aged 3-10 years, clinical research shows that taking 12.5 billion CFUs daily of a specific combination of L. acidophilus CUL21 and CUL60, Bifidobacterium bifidum CUL20, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis CUL34 (Lab4), and vitamin C 50 mg daily reduces the risk of cough by 16% and sore throat by 20%, and modestly reduces school absenteeism and antibiotic use when compared with placebo. However, nasal symptoms, fever, and wheezing were not reduced (106943). A different combination product containing L. acidophilus DDS-1 1 billion CFUs and B. animalis subsp. lactis UABLA-12 4 billion CFUs (Up4-Junior, UAS Laboratories) with fructo-oligosaccharides 50 mg has also been evaluated. Clinical research in children 3-12 years of age with a sick household member shows that taking this product daily for 2 weeks modestly shortens the duration of respiratory infections, but does not reduce the risk of developing an infection, when compared with placebo (98439). In overweight adults or adults with obesity, taking 50 billion CFUs of a specific combination of L. acidophilus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, B. bifidum, and B. animalis subsp. lactis (Lab4P) for 24 weeks reduces the overall likelihood of having upper respiratory tract infection symptoms, such as sneezing, cough, and blocked nose, by approximately 40% when compared with placebo (103439).
• Retinopathy of prematurity. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in premature infants shows that taking 6 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus NCDO 1748 and Bifidobacterium bifidum NCDO 2203 (UFC Inforan, Switzerland) from 7 days of age until 34 weeks postmenstrual age or discharge does not reduce the odds of retinopathy of prematurity when compared with a control group of infants not given these probiotics. The infants in this study were born at less than 32 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111794). This study is limited by the lack of randomization to treatment group; placement was based on year of birth. Also, one large observational study in premature infants suggests that taking L. acidophilus 1 to 3 billion CFUs with Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis during the first month of life for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis was not associated with a reduced risk of retinopathy of prematurity. The infants in this study were born between 22-29 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111771).
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study in patients with moderate-to-severe RA shows that taking capsules containing freeze-dried strains of L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum daily for 8 weeks does not improve RA severity, the number of tender or swollen joints, or joint pain when compared with placebo (95418).
• Rotaviral diarrhea. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for rotaviral diarrhea. Details: One preliminary clinical study shows that taking a combination of L. acidophilus AD031 2 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) and Bifidobacterium longum BORI 20 billion CFUs twice daily for 3 days reduces the duration of rotaviral diarrhea by an average of 3 days when compared with placebo (95334). However, one clinical study using a lower dose and different strain of L. acidophilus (La-14) 200 million CFUs twice daily for 5 days shows that this regimen does not reduce the duration of watery diarrhea or affect the viral load in children aged 9 months to 5 years with confirmed norovirus or rotavirus infection (96887). A small clinical study shows that heat-killed L. acidophilus LB 20-30 billion cells daily for up to 4 days can modestly reduce the duration of diarrhea in infants and children, some of which had confirmed rotavirus (90295).
• Sepsis. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in premature infants shows that taking 6 billion CFUs of a combination of L. acidophilus NCDO 1748 with Bifidobacterium bifidum NCDO 2203 (UFC Inforan, Switzerland) from 7 days of age until 34 weeks postmenstrual age or discharge reduces the odds of late onset sepsis by 55% when compared with a control group of infants not given these probiotics. The infants in this study were born at less than 32 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111794). This study is limited by the lack of randomization to treatment group; placement was based on year of birth. One large observational study in infants fed a mix of human milk and formula, but not strictly human milk or formula, suggests that taking L. acidophilus 1 to 3 billion CFUs with Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis during the first month of life for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis was associated with a 31% reduction in the development of clinical sepsis. The infants in this study were born between 22-29 weeks gestation and had a birthweight of less than 1500 grams (111771).
• Short bowel syndrome. Although there has been interest in using oral Lactobacillus acidophilus for short bowel syndrome, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lactobacillus for this condition.
• Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in children with chronic diarrhea due to SIBO shows that taking a combination of lyophilized L. acidophilus 1.5 grams and Lacticaseibacillus casei 1.5 grams by mouth twice daily for 21 days decreases average daily stools by 1.5, but does not improve other symptoms, when compared with placebo (91143). Also, one preliminary clinical study shows that taking a total of 2 billion CFUs of L. acidophilus and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (Lacidofil) daily for 4 weeks does not prevent the development of SIBO in children that started treatment with omeprazole 20 mg daily for epigastric pain (90262).
• Travelers' diarrhea. It is unclear if oral Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for the prevention of travelers' diarrhea. Details: A meta-analysis which included three clinical studies evaluating the use of L. acidophilus in adults traveling to different parts of the world found no benefit for the prevention of travelers' diarrhea when compared with placebo (101445). The effectiveness of this species may vary significantly based upon the destination of travel. Destinations in the same country can have different results, probably due to differences in bacteria and other microorganisms at different locations (10216).
• Ulcerative colitis. Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: The best evidence of benefit is for a specific combination product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma). Doses of 3 grams (equivalent to 900 billion colony-forming units (CFUs)) once or twice daily have been used in combination with conventional treatment. In children aged 1-16 years, doses of 450-1800 billion CFUs for up to one year have been used (3261,14370,14371,16841,95337). A meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking this product as an adjunct to standard ulcerative colitis treatment can increase remission rates in adults and children by about 1.7-fold when compared with standard treatment alone (95337). Preliminary clinical research in patients with moderate to severe symptoms taking mesalazine 1200 mg daily shows that taking an unknown dose of L. acidophilus twice daily along with Bifidobacterium bifidum BGN4 and Ligilactobacillus salivarius (Acronelle, Bromatech srl, Milan, Italy) for 2 years modestly improves patient- and physician-scales of overall symptoms when compared with taking mesalazine alone. There were also improvements in stool frequency and rectal bleeding (110981). Although some contradictory evidence exists (3261,16841), most research shows that taking Visbiome or a combination of L. acidophilus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 (Probio-Tec AB-25) does not prevent relapse in people who are already in remission (95337,95338).
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: In children aged 4 months to 5 years with a previous UTI, clinical research shows that taking a specific combination of L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (Complete Probiotic Platinum) for 18 months increases the median time to the first incidence of recurrence by approximately 3 months and increases the percentage of children without a UTI during the study period from 83% to 97% (103436).
• Vaginal candidiasis. It is unclear if oral or intravaginal Lactobacillus acidophilus is beneficial for vaginal candidiasis. Details: In a small preliminary clinical trial in patients with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis who had undergone a week of oral fluconazole treatment followed by intravaginal L. acidophilus LA 02 and Limosilactobacillus fermentum LF10, 72.4% of patients demonstrated a lack of clinical recurrence over a 7 month observational period. All patients took fluconazole 200 mg three times in the first week followed by intravaginal application with at least 0.4 billion colony-forming units each of L. acidophilus LA 02 and Limosilactobacillus fermentum LF10, along with arabinogalactan and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) on alternate days for 10 days and then once weekly for 10 weeks (111781). However, a combination of L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii, and Streptococcus thermophilus (Femilac) given intravaginally, does not seem to reduce the risk of vaginal candidiasis infection following use of antibiotics (12108). There is also some evidence that eating yogurt enriched with L. acidophilus daily does not reduce the risk of recurrent vaginal candidiasis (1245).
• Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Oral Lactobacillus acidophilus has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research shows that taking L. acidophilus LA-5 1.75 billion colony-forming units (CFUs), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 500 million CFUs, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB12 1.75 billion CFUs, and Saccharomyces boulardii 1.5 billion CFUs twice daily for 15 days reduces the risk of VAP to 12%, compared with 28% in those taking placebo. Half of the dose was given onto the oropharynx and half via a nasogastric tube (107524). More evidence is needed to rate Lactobacillus acidophilus for these uses.

(Read more about LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Coronary heart disease (CHD). A diet high in soluble fiber, such as that found in oats, reduces the risk of CHD. Details: Clinical research shows that a diet containing foods high in fiber, such as oats, oat bran, or whole oat flour, reduces the risk of CHD (2737,4960,4962,4963,4964,4965,4966,4967,4968). In 1993, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a health claim stating that consuming at least 3 grams of soluble fiber per day, as part of a diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol, may reduce the risk of CHD (102336). However, clinical studies show that at least 3.6 grams of soluble fiber daily is needed to reduce the risk of CHD (5786,5787,5788,5794,5795,5796).
• Dyslipidemia. A diet rich in soluble fiber, such as that found in oats, can reduce cholesterol by a moderate amount. Details: Oats, oat bran, and other soluble fibers can modestly reduce total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, especially when consumed as part of a diet low in saturated fat. Consuming 56-150 grams of whole oat products such as oatmeal and oat bran, containing 3.6-10 grams of soluble fiber daily, can significantly lower total and LDL cholesterol levels. For each gram of soluble fiber consumed, total cholesterol decreases by about 1.4 mg/dL and LDL by about 1.2 mg/dL. Eating 3-10 grams of soluble fiber daily can reduce total cholesterol by about 4-14 mg/dL (4976,4977,5786,5788,5792,5794,5795,8521,107749,113488,113495). For example, eating 3 bowls of oatmeal (28 gram servings) daily, providing a total of 3 grams of soluble fiber daily, can decrease total cholesterol by about 5 mg/dL (5788). However, consuming more than 10 grams of soluble fiber daily doesn't seem to increase effectiveness (5788). A meta-analysis comparing the effects of oats and isolated beta-glucans shows that both products similarly impact lipid profiles, suggesting that the bioactive component of oats are beta-glucans (113488). Oat bran products, such as oat bran muffins and oat bran flakes, may vary in their ability to lower cholesterol, depending on the total soluble fiber content and other dietary variables (6188). Whole oat products might be more effective for lowering LDL and total cholesterol than foods containing oat bran plus soluble fiber (10145). Although oats are shown to lower total and LDL cholesterol, a meta-analysis and a small clinical study in adults with and without dyslipidemia shows that consuming oatmeal or oat products does not reduce triglycerides or increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol when compared with controls (113488,113495).

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Diabetes. A diet rich in whole grains, such as oats, may help prevent diabetes or improve blood glucose control in patients with type 1, type 2, or gestational diabetes. Details: Population research shows that for every 16 gram daily serving of whole grains, including oats, there is a 7% to 11% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes (100622). There is also evidence that consuming oats can decrease blood glucose and insulin levels, as well as lipid levels, in patients with diabetes. The glycemic effects of oats depend on the level of processing of the oat products. Consuming intact oat kernels or thick-cut oats (>0.6 mm) reduces postprandial blood glucose and insulin, but consuming thin-cut, or "quick", oats has no effect (105536). Clinical research shows that consuming oats and oat bran for 4-8 weeks decreases pre-prandial blood glucose, 24-hour plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin levels, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in people with type 2 diabetes (4980,4982,6266,103345). Various doses have been used, including 3 grams of soluble fiber daily, or bread providing 34 grams of total fiber daily (9 grams of soluble fiber) (4961,4980). Additional clinical research in obese adults with type 2 diabetes shows that eating whole grain oats 50-100 grams daily in place of other carbohydrates reduces postprandial blood glucose by 19-27 mg/dL when compared with other carbohydrates in a healthy diet. After 1 year, the groups consuming 50 grams and 100 grams of oats had an additional 0.48% and 0.64% reduction in HbA1c, respectively, when compared with the regular healthy diet group (97520). There is also some evidence that consuming oats 50 grams daily, containing 25 grams of soluble fiber, might be more effective for improving glycemic control and decreasing hyperinsulinemia than the standard moderate fiber diet recommended by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) (6266). Oats have also been evaluated in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. One very small clinical study shows that taking 50 grams of a specific oat product (Betaglucare), providing beta-glucans 6 grams, in three divided doses daily for one week is beneficial for glycemic control and variability when compared with a standard diet without beta-glucans or with taking only 25 grams of the product daily. Maximal, mean, and pre- and post-meal blood glucose levels were modestly lower, and minimal blood glucose levels were modestly higher. Most measures of glycemic variability were statistically different, although there were no differences in the duration of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia between groups (105261). Oats have also been evaluated in patients with gestational diabetes. A randomized, controlled trial shows that taking 30 grams of a specific oat bran product (OAB; Golden Light Cup Company) orally twice daily at lunch and dinner for 4 weeks improves mean fasting blood glucose and two-hour postprandial glucose when compared with a control group. After 4 weeks, the mean fasting blood glucose and 2-hour postprandial glucose in the treatment group were 85 mg/dL and 104 mg/dL, respectively, compared with 93 mg/dL and 117 mg/dL, respectively, in the control group (107751). The validity of this study is limited by the short treatment duration and lack of follow-up.
• Gastric cancer. A diet rich in soluble fiber, such as that found in oats, might reduce the risk of gastric cancer. Details: Observational research has found that consuming a diet that includes cereal fiber, such as oats and oat bran, might reduce the incidence of gastric cancer (10435).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Regular consumption of oats does not seem to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer. Details: Observational research has found that consuming oat bran or oats orally doesn't seem to reduce the risk of colon cancer. Additionally, consuming fiber, including oat-bran fiber, is not associated with a reduction in the risk for recurrence of colorectal adenomas (4820,5104).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. Although there is interest in using topical oats for acne, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose.
• Anxiety. Although there is interest in using oral oats for anxiety, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose.
• Atopic dermatitis (eczema). Topical colloidal oatmeal cream may be beneficial in patients with atopic dermatitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a cream containing colloidal oatmeal 1% daily for 2 weeks moderately reduces the severity of atopic dermatitis when compared with baseline (103344). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Other research suggests that colloidal oatmeal may be beneficial when used in combination with topical steroids. Clinical research shows that the benefits obtained from applying an ointment containing fluocinolone 0.025% to the hands for 2 weeks were better maintained in the patients who also used a cream containing colloidal oatmeal 1% during this time period and for an additional 4 weeks when compared with patients using fluocinolone and the cream base without colloidal oatmeal. Quality of life was also improved in the patients using colloidal oatmeal (103340).
• Breast cancer. Observational research suggests that regular oatmeal intake may be associated with reduced mortality from breast cancer. Details: Population research in postmenopausal patients has found that those who have eaten 50 grams of oatmeal daily prior to a breast cancer diagnosis have a 20% reduced risk of all-cause mortality in the 7 years following the diagnosis when compared with patients who have not eaten oatmeal. However, no benefit was seen when post-diagnostic oatmeal intakes were examined (103343).
• Burns. Although there is interest in using topical oats for burns, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose.
• Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although there is interest in using oral oats for CFS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose.
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if oral oats are beneficial in healthy adults with mild memory impairment. Details: Preliminary clinical research in healthy middle-aged adults with self-reported memory decline shows that consuming a specific wild green-oats extract (Neuravena, Frutarom) 800 mg as a single dose improves overall speed, but not overall accuracy, of cognitive performance when compared with placebo. However, a higher dose of 1600 mg was ineffective (97519).
• Dry skin. It is unclear if applying lotion containing colloidal oat extract improves dry skin to a greater extent than other lotion products. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying a lotion containing colloidal oat extract (Aveeno Active Naturals Skin Relief 24Hr Moisturizing Lotion, Johnson & Johnson) twice daily for 2 weeks improves itchiness, cracking, scaling, dryness, and roughness when compared to baseline in females with dry skin (91458). Additional preliminary clinical research shows that applying a colloidal oatmeal lotion to the legs twice daily for three weeks reduces skin dryness and improves skin integrity when compared to baseline in adults with dry skin (97518). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral oats are beneficial for exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: A small clinical trial shows that eating two cookies containing oat flour 60 grams daily for 8 weeks reduces muscle soreness 48 or 72 hours after downhill running when compared with baseline (103341).
• Fat redistribution syndrome. It is unclear if oral oats are beneficial for fat redistribution syndrome. Details: Consumption of a high fiber diet, including oats, with adequate energy and protein might prevent fat deposition in patients with HIV. A one-gram increase in total dietary fiber may decrease the risk of fat deposition by 7% (12517).
• Gallbladder disease. Although there is interest in using oral oats for gallbladder disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose.
• Hypertension. It is unclear if oral oats are beneficial for hypertension. Details: A meta-analysis of 21 clinical studies in healthy adults and those with a variety of metabolic conditions including hypertension shows that consumption of oat products reduces systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 3 mmHg but has no effect on diastolic blood pressure (DBP) when compared with control. Subgroup analysis suggests that consuming oat products reduces SBP by 10 mmHg in patients with hypertension at baseline. An additional subgroup analysis suggests that consuming at least 5 grams of beta-glucan-enriched oats daily or consuming oats for a duration at least 8 weeks reduces SBP and DBP (113494). Observational research has found that consumption of oats as oatmeal or oat cereal does not seem to reduce DBPor SBP in males with minor elevations in blood pressure or patients with dyslipidemia (2956,113495). A randomized, controlled trial in patients with stage 1 hypertension receiving dietary guidance shows that taking 30 grams of oat bran, providing 8.9 grams of dietary fiber, once daily with breakfast or in between meals for 3 months improves various blood pressure measures when compared with dietary guidance alone. After 3 months of treatment, 24-hour maximum SBP and DBP decreased by 14 mmHg and 11 mmHg, respectively, and office SBP and DBP decreased by 15 mmHg and 10 mmHg, respectively. Oat consumption may also have impacted antihypertensive medication use. Two patients in the control group increased doses of antihypertensive medications, whereas 6 patients in the treatment group decreased doses and 1 patient discontinued use (107750). The effect of oral oat bran on patients with stage 2 hypertension or pre-hypertension is unknown.
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Although there is interest in using oral oats for IBS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose.
• Metabolic syndrome. Limited research suggests that oats may not be beneficial for metabolic syndrome. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with metabolic syndrome shows that adding oat bran 40 grams daily for 6 weeks to a low-calorie diet does not reduce the incidence of metabolic syndrome. Oat bran also does not improve body weight, blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, or blood glucose levels when compared with a low-calorie diet alone in patients with metabolic syndrome (103342).
• Osteoarthritis. Although there is interest in using oral oats for osteoarthritis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this condition.
• Pruritus. Applying oat lotion topically may improve some types of pruritus. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that applying an oat lotion (Espanol) twice daily for up to 2 weeks can decrease itching intensity by about 20% when compared to baseline in patients with pruritus associated with chronic kidney disease (uremic pruritus). This decrease is similar to the effects of applying vinegar 5% solution or taking hydroxyzine 10 mg orally. However, applying the oat lotion does not appear to decrease the frequency of itching (91457).
• Psoriasis. Although there is interest in using topical oats for psoriasis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose.
• Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although there is interest in using oral oats for RA, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose.
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral oats are beneficial for reducing the risk of stroke. Details: Population research suggests that consuming oatmeal for breakfast once weekly might reduce the incidence of stroke by a small amount when compared with consuming white bread or eggs for breakfast (103337).
• Ulcerative colitis. Oral oats have only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; their effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific oat-based product (Profermin, Nordisk Rebalance) containing fermented oat flour, Lactobacillus plantarum, barley malt flour, and lecithin, 250 mL orally twice daily for 8 weeks, reduces disease activity and increases remission in about two-fold more patients with relapsing ulcerative colitis, when compared with treatment with a specific nutritional beverage (Fresubin Original, Fresenius Kabi) (90271).
• Wound healing. Although there is interest in using topical oats for wound healing, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of oats for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate oats for these uses.

(Read more about OATS)

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Hypercholesterolemia. Most clinical research shows that oral pectin at a dose of 15 grams daily can slightly lower total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Details: While some small studies in patients with or without hypercholesterolemia suggest that pectin 1-12 grams daily for up to 12 weeks does not reduce lipid levels (2215,2217), other research in patients with hypercholesterolemia shows that taking pectin 15 grams daily for 4 weeks consistently reduces total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol by around 7% to 10% when compared with baseline or placebo (2214,2216,92473). Some forms of pectin might lower cholesterol levels better than others. Pectin with a higher molecular weight and higher degree of esterification appears to be the most effective (92473). A larger clinical study also shows that taking 20 grams of pectin and guar gum, along with small amounts of insoluble fiber, reduces total cholesterol by nearly 8% and LDL cholesterol by nearly 11%, but does not improve high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol or triglycerides, when compared with placebo (12547).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Colorectal cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral pectin for the prevention of colorectal cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pectin for this purpose.
• Diarrhea. It is unclear if oral pectin is beneficial in children with persistent diarrhea. Details: A small clinical study in children aged 5-12 months in developing nations with persistent diarrhea shows that taking pectin 4 grams/kg reduces the duration of diarrhea and vomiting, and reduces the need for oral rehydration solution and intravenous fluid, when compared with a rice-diet control (12575). Pectin has also been evaluated in combination with other ingredients. One clinical study in children aged 6 months to 6 years with acute diarrhea shows that taking a combination of apple pectin and chamomile (Diarrhoesan, Dr. Loges + Co. GmbH) for up to 5 days reduces the frequency of stools by day 3 by about 1.36-fold when compared with placebo, with improvements maintained through day 5. This combination product was given hourly up to a maximum dose of 50 mL in children 6-12 months of age, 60 mL in children 1-3 years of age, and 80 mL in children 4-6 years of age (19705). It is unclear if these findings are due to pectin, chamomile, or the combination.
• Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). It is unclear if oral pectin is beneficial in children with GERD. Details: A small clinical study in children with GERD and cerebral palsy shows that adding pectin to enteral nutrition in a 1:2 ratio for 4 weeks might reduce some symptoms of GERD. The number of vomiting episodes per week was reduced by 60% and the frequency of coughing/wheezing was reduced by 76% for children given the pectin diet when compared with those given a non-pectin diet (92476).
• Impaired glucose tolerance (Prediabetes). It is unclear if oral pectin is beneficial in patients with impaired glucose tolerance. Details: A small clinical study in middle-aged patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose shows that drinking 400 mL of a beverage containing 40 grams/L of sugar beet pectin in two divided doses daily for 12 weeks does not improve fasting or postprandial plasma glucose concentrations or serum lipid levels when compared to baseline (34118).
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Although there has been interest in using oral pectin for IBS, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pectin for this purpose.
• Mercury toxicity. It is unclear if oral pectin is beneficial in patients with mercury toxicity. Details: A small clinical study in children with mercury poisoning shows that taking pectin 2.5 grams daily for 21 days and then 5 grams daily for 39 days increases mercury excretion in the urine, decreases the duration of mercury toxicity, and improves psychological symptoms when compared to baseline (31657). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Niacin-induced flushing. It is unclear if oral pectin is beneficial for the prevention or management of niacin-induced flushing. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking apple pectin 2 grams 30 minutes prior to taking niacin extended-release 1000 mg reduces the duration of flushing by about 35 minutes when compared with placebo. However, apple pectin does not reduce the incidence of flushing, the time to flush, or the maximum severity of flushing (92477).
• Peptic ulcers. It is unclear if oral pectin is beneficial for the prevention of peptic ulcers. Details: A small clinical study in patients with recently healed duodenal ulcers shows that taking apple pectin 10 grams twice daily for 6 months does not reduce the recurrence of duodenal ulcers when compared with placebo (31697).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral pectin is beneficial in patients with prostate cancer. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with prostate cancer show that taking a specific modified citrus pectin product (Pectasol, Econugenics) 4.8 grams three times daily following prostatectomy, radiation, or cryosurgery for up to one year slows disease progression and increases the time to prostate specific antigen (PSA) doubling when compared to baseline (15020,108525). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Radiation exposure. Although there has been interest in using oral pectin to minimize exposure to environmental radiation, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of pectin for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate pectin for these uses.

(Read more about PECTIN)

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Oral enteric-coated peppermint oil is conditionally recommended by the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) for the relief of global IBS symptoms, such as abdominal pain. Details: The ACG conditionally recommends the use of peppermint for the relief of global IBS symptoms. This recommendation is based on an available meta-analysis of generally low-quality clinical research (105124). Several clinical trials and meta-analyses show that taking enteric-coated peppermint oil 1-2 capsules orally two to four times daily reduces abdominal pain, distention, flatulence, and bowel movements in patients with IBS. Each capsule provides approximately 0.2 mL of peppermint oil or 180-225 mg peppermint oil. Most trials have used specific products (Colpermin, Tillotts Pharma; Mintoil, Cadigroup; Ibgard, IM HealthScience, Tempocol) (3802,3803,4469,11778,11779,17681,17682,68467,68515,68522)(68603,68604,68605,96360,99493,109980). The most recent meta-analysis to date shows that four patients would need to take peppermint oil to prevent one patient from having persistent IBS symptoms, and seven patients would need to take peppermint oil to prevent one patient from having abdominal pain. However, the individual studies included in the analysis lasted no more than 12 weeks (109980); any long-term effects are unclear. Although most studies have shown benefit for reducing symptoms, some older studies have found no significant effect (11777,11789) or only short-term benefits (68620). Also, a well-designed study shows that taking peppermint oil capsules designed for either small intestinal release (enteric-coated) or ileocolonic release does not increase the number of people with at least a 30% decrease in abdominal pain over a period of 4 weeks, although symptoms are modestly reduced when compared with placebo (102602). Another clinical trial in patients with moderate to severe IBS shows that taking a specific enteric-coated formulation of peppermint oil (Pepogest; Nature's Way) 180 mg three times daily for 6 weeks does not further improve symptom severity when compared with placebo. However, both groups experienced a large improvement on the IBS-Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) and the IBS Global Improvement Scale (107955). The validity of these findings is limited due to lost data and inconsistent follow-up; additionally, adverse effects occurred more frequently in the peppermint oil group. The reasons for these negative findings are unclear but may include short treatment durations and the use of different formulations; additionally, IBS is comprised of various subtypes and symptoms that can range in severity and presentation, which may alter treatment response. Some clinical research has also evaluated a specific combination product (Atrantil, KBS Research) containing peppermint leaf, red quebracho extract, and conker tree extract. Taking this product as needed for 2 weeks seems to reduce constipation and bloating when compared to baseline in patients with constipation-predominant IBS (95429,95430). It is unclear if the effects of this product are due to peppermint, the other ingredients, or the combination.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Barium enema-related colonic spasm. Rectal peppermint, as part of barium enema preparations, seems to reduce colonic spasms during examination. Oral peppermint also seems to be beneficial. Details: Rectal use of peppermint oil, added as an ingredient in barium enema preparations, seems to relax the colon during barium enema examination and reduce the percentage of patients who experience colonic spasms by about 25% to 30% (6739,6749,12009). Adding peppermint oil to the barium enema seems to be at least as effective as using systemic scopolamine (Buscopan). Adding peppermint oil to the barium solution also does not seem to impair image quality (12009). Some clinical research also shows that taking peppermint oil orally before the start of a double-contrast barium enema examination decreases spasms and might also increase diagnostic quality (14467).
• Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Oral and inhaled peppermint seem to reduce nausea and vomiting in patients with CINV. Details: Clinical research shows that adding peppermint oil, 40 drops in 20 mL water, every 8 hours following chemotherapy treatment to treatment with standard antiemetics reduces the severity of nausea, vomiting, and anorexia by moderate to large amounts over 48 hours when compared with a plain water placebo (105123). The use of peppermint oil aromatherapy has also been investigated. Clinical research shows that adding 2 drops of peppermint oil to a cool, damp washcloth for use on the neck as aromatherapy for about 30 minutes helps relieve chemotherapy-induced nausea by a small amount when compared with a washcloth without peppermint oil (102603). Additional clinical research in patients receiving standard antiemetics after chemotherapy shows that applying one drop of peppermint oil below the nose three times daily for 5 days reduces the severity of nausea and the frequency of nausea, vomiting, and retching by a moderate to large amount when compared with the antiemetics alone. These parameters were not improved following treatment with cisplatin (105122). A meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials in adults receiving chemotherapy also shows that peppermint oil aromatherapy moderately improves nausea and vomiting when compared with control. However, the results of this analysis are limited by heterogenous application methods, doses, and durations of peppermint therapy (114761). In children with acute leukemia, a small clinical study shows that aromatherapy with 2 drops of peppermint oil and 3 drops of lemon oil in 80 mL of water diffused 30 minutes prior to and 2 and 4 hours after chemotherapy once weekly for 4 weeks decreases the severity of nausea, vomiting, and retching, and improves quality of life scores when compared with diffused water or no intervention (112015). The validity of these findings is limited by the use of patient-reported outcomes. Another small clinical trial in children receiving chemotherapy for acute leukemia shows that aromatherapy with peppermint oil 2%, 0.2 mL inhaled over 3 minutes immediately prior to 3 consecutive chemotherapy sessions, added to standard care (e.g. antiemetic medications), reduces overall incidence of nausea by 40%, and improves nausea and vomiting severity scores, when compared with no additional interventions. These results were similar to those receiving Swedish massage prior to chemotherapy sessions (114759).
• Dyspepsia. Oral peppermint, in combination with caraway and possibly other ingredients, seems to reduce symptoms of dyspepsia. It is unclear if oral peppermint alone is beneficial. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking specific products containing peppermint and caraway oil (Enteroplant, Dr Willmar Schwabe Pharmaceuticals; Menthacarin, Dr Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co.) improves quality of life and reduces symptoms of dyspepsia, including feelings of fullness, pain, and mild gastrointestinal spasms (6740,6741,10075,96344,102600). A meta-analysis of three of these clinical studies shows that taking this combination product 2-3 times daily for 4 weeks modestly reduces abdominal pain when compared with placebo (110091). Taking this combination twice daily for 4 weeks also improves postprandial distress syndrome and epigastric pain syndrome, two subtypes of dyspepsia, when compared with placebo (96344). The combination of enteric-coated peppermint oil 90 mg and caraway oil 50 mg appears to be comparable to cisapride for relieving dyspepsia when taken 2-3 times daily for up to 4 weeks (6740,6741,10075). However, most trials investigating this combination are small and/or of overall low quality (102600). A specific combination product containing peppermint leaf (Iberogast, Steigerwald Arzneimittelwerk GmbH) also seems to improve symptoms of dyspepsia. The combination includes peppermint leaf plus clown's mustard plant, German chamomile, caraway, licorice, milk thistle, angelica, celandine, and lemon balm (7049). A meta-analysis of studies using this combination product shows that taking 1 mL orally three times daily over a period of 4 weeks reduces the severity of acid reflux, epigastric pain, cramping, nausea, and vomiting when compared with placebo (13089). A similar combination product containing extracts from peppermint leaf, clown's mustard plant, German chamomile flower, caraway, licorice root, and lemon balm (STW 5-II, Steigerwald Arzneimittelwerk GmbH) 1 mL taken three times daily for up to 8 weeks eliminates gastrointestinal symptoms in 40% more dyspepsia patients when compared with placebo (12724).
• Endoscopy-associated adverse effects. Intraluminal peppermint seems to reduce spasticity during an endoscopy. It is unclear if oral peppermint is beneficial for reducing adverse effects related to endoscopy. Details: A meta-analysis of four clinical trials show that peppermint oil, administered orally or intraluminally, reduces the incidence of spasticity by about 41% when compared with placebo in patients undergoing endoscopy, with severe spasticity occurring at about 30% the rate of those taking placebo. However, there was no effect on subjective pain (102604). Individual clinical studies show that intraluminal peppermint oil can reduce both pain and spams in patients undergoing endoscopy (18220,68371,68395,68445,68532). However, there are limitations with this form of administration, including cost and practicality, which has led to interest in the use of oral formulations (104221). Studies evaluating oral extended-release peppermint have been conflicting. While one study shows that a specific extended-release peppermint oil product (Colpermin) 187 mg or 0.2 mL taken orally 4 hours prior to a colonoscopy reduces procedure time, pain, and spasticity (68532), a study using another specific extended-release peppermint oil (IBGard) did not show an effect on colonic spasms, procedure time, or adenoma detection rate when compared with placebo (104221). These differing outcomes may be due to timing of administration. The study that showed benefit administered the treatment 4 hours prior to endoscopy, whereas the study showing no benefit administered the treatment only 1 hour prior. This suggests that extended-release peppermint may need to be administered at least 4 hours prior to the procedure to allow for adequate colonic release (68532,102604,104221).
• Nipple fissures. Topical peppermint seems to reduce cracked skin and pain in the nipples due to breastfeeding. Details: Clinical research shows that topical application of peppermint oil in gel or water reduces cracked skin and pain in the nipple area from breastfeeding when compared with using placebo, lanolin, or the expressed breast milk technique (68454,68462). Other research shows that applying peppermint oil in cream immediately after breastfeeding for 2 weeks decreases pain and trauma in the nipple area similarly to the topical application of dexpanthenol or lanolin (96365).
• Pressure ulcers. Topical peppermint seems to reduce the risk of pressure ulcers. Details: Clinical research in bedridden patients shows that prophylactic application of a topical gel containing peppermint oil 0.2% three times daily for up to 14 days results in pressure injuries in about 23% of patients compared with 77% of those given a placebo gel (102605).
• Tension headache. Topical peppermint seems to relieve tension headaches. Details: Clinical research shows that topical application of peppermint oil 10% relieves tension headaches when compared with placebo (3801,6190).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Abdominal pain. Although there has been interest in using oral peppermint for abdominal pain, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this condition.
• Anxiety. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for reducing anxiety. Details: A clinical trial in patients presenting to the emergency department for an acute coronary syndrome event shows that placing 3 drops of peppermint oil on a cotton ball and inhaling for 1 hour improves anxiety and respiratory rate when compared with baseline or placebo (107958). Due to the single-dose nature of this study, the effects of repeated inhalation of peppermint oil are unclear.
• Athletic performance. It is unclear if oral peppermint oil is beneficial for athletic performance. Details: Preliminary clinical research in trained adult runners shows that taking peppermint essential oil, 0.05 mL diluted in 500 mL of water, orally once 30 minutes before exercise improves running time to exhaustion by 11% when compared with placebo (112742). Another very small clinical study in elite soccer athletes shows that use of a specific peppermint essential oil (doTERRA), 1 drop rubbed into hands and inhaled with 5 deep breaths, does not improve jump performance metrics when compared with placebo (114760).
• Breast cancer-related hot flashes. It is unclear if topical peppermint is beneficial for reducing hot flashes in patients with breast cancer. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that using a spray containing a combination of peppermint and neroli hydrolat does not alleviate hot flashes in most patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer when compared with using a plain water spray (68481).
• Cognitive function. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for improving cognitive function. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that inhalation of peppermint oil slightly improves memory and the performance of cognitive tasks such as typing, alphabetization, and ordering, but not attention and speed of task completion, when compared with control (56954,68416,68466).
• Common cold. Although there has been interest in using oral, topical, or inhaled peppermint for the common cold, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this condition.
• Dental plaque. Topical peppermint has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that rinsing the mouth for one minute with 10 mL of a specific combination product (HiOra, Himalaya Herbal Healthcare) containing peppermint oil and numerous other ingredients twice daily for two days reduces plaque index or plaque area when compared with placebo; however, it was not as effective as chlorhexidine 0.2% solution (68530). It is unclear if these effects are due to peppermint oil, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Diffuse esophageal spasm. It is unclear if oral peppermint oil is beneficial for diffuse esophageal spasm. Details: A small exploratory study in adults with diffuse esophageal spasm shows that drinking a solution of peppermint oil, 5 drops in 10 mL of water, can resolve esophageal contractions when compared with baseline (13415). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral peppermint oil is beneficial for reducing menstrual pain. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking three capsules of peppermint oil (Colpermin; Tillotts Company or Razak company) daily for 3 days, starting on the first day of menstruation, is as effective as mefenamic acid 250 mg three times daily for reducing pain, and more effective for reducing nausea and vomiting, associated with dysmenorrhea. However, mefenamic acid was more effective for reducing bleeding and analgesic use (105125).
• Fatigue. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil improves fatigue in patients with cardiac disease. Details: A clinical trial in hospitalized patients with various forms of cardiac disease shows that placing 3 drops of peppermint oil on a cotton ball and inhaling for 20 minutes nightly for 7 days improves fatigue scores when compared with placebo. These improvements were similar to those seen with lavender oil inhalation. Fatigue scores decreased by 24 and 21 points in the peppermint and lavender groups, respectively, compared with a 2-point reduction in the placebo group (107959). The validity of these findings is limited due to the short duration of treatment.
• Halitosis. Peppermint has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients as a mouthwash; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that rinsing the mouth with a specific combination of tea tree oil, peppermint, and lemon essential oil once for three minutes improves breath smell when compared with placebo or benzydamine hydrochloride (19177). Other preliminary clinical research in elderly adults with dementia who require oral care assistance shows that cleaning the mouth with a mixture of peppermint oil, tea tree oil, and lemon essential oils diluted to 0.5%, applied via gauze, twice daily for 7 days improves halitosis scores and oral condition scores when compared with placebo (112957).
• Insomnia. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for insomnia. Details: Preliminary clinical research in cancer patients shows that receiving aromatherapy as three drops of peppermint oil applied to a cotton ball and attached to the collar for 20 minutes at bedtime for one week improves sleep when compared with baseline. However, it seems to be no better than using lavender oil aromatherapy or using a control of lavender oil 1% (103063).
• Menopausal symptoms. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for menopausal symptoms. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with menopausal symptoms shows that receiving aromatherapy as 2 drops of peppermint oil with upper extremity massage and for 30 minutes twice weekly for 4 weeks moderately improves menopause symptom scores, including both somatic symptoms and urogenital symptoms, when compared with placebo (112745).
• Migraine headache. It is unclear if intranasal or inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for migraine headache. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that using 1-2 doses of intranasal peppermint oil 1.5% (Poursina Company) at the start of migraine pain is as effective as intranasal lidocaine 4%, and more effective than placebo, for reducing migraine headache intensity. Approximately 42% of those using peppermint oil indicated a high level of headache reduction, compared with 42% of those using lidocaine and 5% of those using placebo. Also, pain relief was felt within 5 minutes in more patients using peppermint than placebo (105126). However, it is unclear if participants were truly blinded to the use of peppermint oil. Other preliminary clinical research in pediatric patients with migraine or other chronic headaches shows that receiving aromatherapy with peppermint oil over 10 minutes during a footbath does not improve pain or anxiety scores when compared with control (112746).
• Mosquito repellent. Although there has been interest in using topical peppermint oil as a mosquito repellent, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this purpose.
• Myalgia. Although there has been interest in using topical peppermint oil for myalgia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this condition.
• Oral mucositis. Topical peppermint has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in adults undergoing stem cell transplantation shows that using an oral rinse containing peppermint oil and German chamomile three times daily, in addition to standard treatment with sodium chloride and chlorhexidine, reduces the duration and severity of mucositis and the use of narcotic analgesics when compared with placebo and standard treatment. However, this oral rinse does not reduce or delay the occurrence of mucositis or affect the duration of hospitalization (96363). Another small clinical study in adults with head and neck cancers undergoing radiation shows that rinsing with 5 mL of a polyherbal mouthwash containing peppermint oil, German chamomile, aloe vera, and honey for 1 minute 3 times daily for 6 weeks reduces oral mucositis incidence, severity, and pain when compared with chlorhexidine 0.2% and placebo (111291). Clinical research in adults receiving treatment with 5-fluorouracil shows that using an oral rinse containing peppermint, sage tea, and thyme in addition to basic oral care, starting on the first day of chemotherapy and continuing for 14 days, delays the onset of mucositis, but not the rate or severity of mucositis, when compared with basic oral care alone (96364). It is unclear if these effects are due to peppermint oil, other ingredients, or the combinations.
• Osteoarthritis. Although there has been interest in using topical peppermint oil for osteoarthritis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this condition.
• Pain (acute). It is unclear if inhaled or topical peppermint oil is beneficial for acute pain. Details: Preliminary clinical research in cardiac patients shows that peppermint oil aromatherapy reduces pain associated with intravenous catheterization by a small amount when compared with a distilled water control (102601). Another small open-label study in adults undergoing venipuncture for dialysis shows that topical application of peppermint gel 5 mL reduces pain scores by approximately 50% when compared with no intervention. These results were similar to using a cold compress (114758). Additionally, a small open-label study in children undergoing a dental procedure, shows that topical application of peppermint oil 0.2% , moderately improves pain scores after a buccal injection when compared with lidocaine spray 15% (114757).
• Postherpetic neuralgia. Although there has been interest in using topical peppermint oil for postherpetic neuralgia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this condition.
• Postoperative ileus. It is unclear if oral peppermint oil is beneficial for the prevention of postoperative ileus. Details: Clinical research shows that taking a specific peppermint oil product (Colpermin, Tillotts Pharma) as two capsules three times daily for 5 days after routine gynecological surgery does not prevent postoperative abdominal distension and dyspepsia when compared with placebo (68602). Conversely, a small clinical study in patients undergoing elective cesarean section shows that taking 20 drops of peppermint oil 4 hours after surgery and then hourly for a total of three doses reduces the time to first bowel sounds by around 3.3 hours, first flatulence by 4.4 hours, and first stool by 5 hours when compared with placebo (110092).
• Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Some preliminary clinical studies suggest that inhaled peppermint may be beneficial for PONV. However, it is unclear if the benefit is due to aromatherapy or improved breathing patterns. Details: Some preliminary clinical research shows that using peppermint aromatherapy helps relieve postoperative nausea (3804,13415,68524,104219,104220). Inhaling peppermint oil 10% and 30% as aromatherapy reduces the severity of nausea when compared with placebo, with no significant difference between concentrations (104220). Small clinical trials show improvement in PONV within the first 4 hours after surgery. However, this effect diminishes beyond 4 hours (104219). Other preliminary clinical research shows that peppermint oil aromatherapy is no more effective for reducing postoperative nausea than inhaling isopropyl alcohol or saline (13416,68529). It is possible that any relief of postoperative nausea observed with peppermint aromatherapy results from improved breathing patterns after surgery rather than peppermint oil itself (13416,90512). One small study shows that inhaling peppermint oil while practicing controlled breathing does not appear to relieve PONV better than practicing controlled breathing alone (90512). Some preliminary clinical research shows that inhaling vapors from a mixture of peppermint, ginger, spearmint, and cardamom essential oils reduces symptoms of postoperative nausea in approximately 15% more patients when compared with inhaling ginger essential oils alone, and in approximately 43% more patients when compared with inhaling saline (89888). However, it is not clear if the effect is due to peppermint, the other oils, or the combination. In contrast, a small clinical trial in adults undergoing port catheter placement shows that application of a specific aromatherapy patch containing peppermint and lavender (Elequil Aromatabs, Beekley Medical) preoperatively does not reduce PONV rescue treatment when compared with placebo (114623). Another small clinical trial in adults with anxiety undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty shows that application of the same patch containing peppermint and lavender every 12 hours for 6 doses does not reduce overall PONV when compared with placebo (114622).
• Postoperative pain. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for postoperative pain. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing open heart cardiac surgery shows that receiving aromatherapy with peppermint oil 10%, 0.1 mL, three times daily for 7 doses moderately improves pain scores when compared with placebo (112747). Other preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing lumbar discectomy surgery shows that receiving aromatherapy with peppermint oil 5 drops once postoperatively modestly improves pain scores and anxiety scores when compared with no intervention (112744). A small clinical trial in adults undergoing port catheter placement shows that application of a specific aromatherapy patch containing peppermint and lavender (Elequil Aromatabs, Beekley Medical) preoperatively does not improve pain scores or reduce opioid rescue treatment in the immediate post-operative period when compared with placebo (114623). Another small clinical trial in adults with anxiety undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty shows that application of the same patch containing peppermint and lavender every 12 hours for 6 doses modestly reduceses opioid consumption on postoperative day 2, but not day 1, 7, or 30, when compared with placebo (114622). However, these changes are unlikely to be clinically relevant. In addition, it is unclear if any potential effects are due to peppermint, lavender, or the combination.
• Postoperative recovery. Inhaled peppermint has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial in adults undergoing port catheter placement shows that application of a specific aromatherapy patch containing peppermint and lavender (Elequil Aromatabs, Beekley Medical) preoperatively does not shorten postoperative length of stay when compared with placebo (114623).
• Postoperative sleep disturbance. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for postoperative sleep disturbance. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults undergoing open heart cardiac surgery shows that receiving aromatherapy with peppermint oil 10%, 0.1 mL, three times daily for 7 doses modestly improves sleep scores when compared with placebo (112747).
• Pre-procedural anxiety. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for reducing anxiety prior to a medical procedure. Details: Preliminary clinical research in cardiac patients shows that peppermint oil aromatherapy does not reduce anxiety associated with intravenous catheterization when compared with a distilled water control (102601).
• Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Inhaled peppermint oil has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that aromatherapy with a mixture of 5% lemon and 5% peppermint essential oils modestly reduces the intensity of nausea and vomiting on days 2-4, but not day 1, when compared with placebo aromatherapy. When nauseated, patients placed three drops of the essential oil mixture (Barij Essence Co.) onto a cotton ball held 3 cm from the nose. This action could be repeated after 5 minutes if needed (105121).
• Pruritus. Some preliminary clinical studies suggest that topical peppermint oil improves itching of various etiologies. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with renal, hepatic, or diabetic pruritus shows that topical application of peppermint oil 5% in petrolatum twice daily for 2 weeks improves symptoms of pruritus when compared with petrolatum alone (96361). Preliminary clinical research in patients with severe or intractable pruritus secondary to burn scars shows that applying a specific product (Chongqing No.1, CQ-01, MJ Medical Gel Systems Ltd.) containing peppermint oil 3.6%, menthol 1.4%, and methyl salicylate 2.5%, covered with gauze for 24 hours, reduces the severity of pruritus for up to 7 days after application when compared with hydrogel covered with gauze or with gauze alone (96362). Preliminary clinical research in females experiencing itchy skin due to intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy also shows that applying peppermint oil 0.5% in sesame oil twice daily for 2 weeks reduces pruritus severity approximately 1.8-fold when compared with sesame oil alone (89478).
• Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Although there has been interest in using oral peppermint for SIBO, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this condition.
• Stress. It is unclear if inhaled peppermint oil is beneficial for stress. Details: Clinical research shows that peppermint aromatherapy decreases physical and perceived levels of stress when compared with baseline (68422,68517). A small clinical study in adults undergoing a virtual reality (VR) driving scenario to test road rage shows that exposure to peppermint oil (Pure Essential Oil of Peppermint, Tisserand Aromatherapy) 5 drops via fan diffuser improves aggressive driving behavior scores but does not seem to improve self-reported stress, aggression, alertness, happiness, or calmness when compared with controls that did not receive aromatherapy during the VR session (112017).
• Toothache. Although there has been interest in using topical peppermint oil for toothache, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this condition.
• Urticaria. Although there has been interest in using topical peppermint oil for urticaria, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of peppermint for this condition. More evidence is needed to rate peppermint for these uses.

(Read more about PEPPERMINT)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Aging skin. Topical red raspberry leaf has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in females aged 30-65 years shows that applying a specific liquid (Antioxidant and Collagen Booster Serum, Max Biocare Pty Ltd.) containing red raspberry leaf cell culture extract 0.0005%, vitamin C 20%, and vitamin E 1% to the face nightly for 8 weeks, in addition to regular facial skin products, improves skin color, elasticity, radiance, smoothness, and appearance of wrinkles when compared with regular facial skin products alone (102355).
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for CVD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Congestive heart failure (CHF). Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for CHF, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Diabetes. Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for diabetes, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Dysmenorrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for dysmenorrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Hypertension. Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for hypertension, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Influenza. Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for influenza, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Labor pain. Some research suggests that oral red raspberry leaf does not reduce analgesic use during labor. Details: Clinical research shows that taking red raspberry leaf 2.4 grams daily, beginning at 32 weeks' gestation and continuing until delivery, does not decrease the need for analgesics in the perinatal time period when compared with placebo (9796). A systematic review of retrospective studies also supports these findings, showing no improvement in perineal outcomes in patients consuming red raspberry leaf prior to labor (108005).
• Menorrhagia. Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for menorrhagia, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Obesity. It is unclear if oral red raspberry fruit is beneficial in patients with obesity. Details: Preliminary clinical research in overweight and obese adults shows that consuming frozen red raspberry fruit 280 grams daily for 8 weeks does not reduce body mass index or waist circumference when compared with control (105873).
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral red raspberry leaf extract is beneficial for knee osteoarthritis. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in patients with knee osteoarthritis shows that taking red raspberry leaf extract 200 or 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks reduces pain at the higher dose when measured by the visual analog scale, but does not improve physical performance, physical activity, walking distance, or Western Ontario McMaster osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) global score or pain, stiffness, and function subscores when compared with placebo (112127).
• Parturition. Some research suggests that oral red raspberry leaf does not shorten the duration of labor. Details: Clinical research shows that taking red raspberry leaf 2.4 grams daily, beginning at 32 weeks' gestation and continuing until delivery, does not reduce the length of labor when compared with placebo (108005). Traditionally, doses of up to 4 grams daily have been recommended for this purpose; however, doses greater than 2.4 grams daily have not been evaluated for safety or efficacy. Further high-quality research is needed to determine the optimal dose, duration, and formulation, if any, of red raspberry leaf for this purpose.
• Pharyngitis. Although there has been interest in using topical red raspberry leaf for pharyngitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose.
• Respiratory tract infections. Although there has been interest in using oral red raspberry leaf for respiratory tract infections, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of red raspberry for this purpose. More evidence is needed to rate red raspberry leaf for this use.

(Read more about RED RASPBERRY)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Cancer. Oral slippery elm has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Retrospective population research has found that taking a specific product containing burdock root, Indian rhubarb, sheep sorrel, and slippery elm bark (Essiac, Resperin Canada Limited) does not improve quality of life in breast cancer patients and may have a negative effect on physical well-being (37419).
• Constipation. Although there has been interest in using oral slippery elm for constipation, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of slippery elm for this purpose.
• Cough. Although there has been interest in using lozenges containing slippery elm for cough, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of slippery elm for this purpose.
• Diarrhea. Although there has been interest in using oral slippery elm for diarrhea, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of slippery elm for this purpose.
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although there has been interest in using oral slippery elm for IBD, including Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of slippery elm for this purpose.
• Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Oral slippery elm has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking a specific formulation containing slippery elm inner bark, lactulose, oat bran, and licorice root can improve stool frequency by 20% and reduce abdominal pain and bloating in people with constipation-predominant IBS when compared to baseline. Also, taking a different formulation containing slippery elm inner bark, bilberry fruit, cinnamon quilts, and agrimony aerial parts can reduce abdominal pain, bloating, and flatulence in people with diarrhea-predominant IBS when compared to baseline, although stool frequency is increased in these individuals as well (35462). It is unclear if these findings are due to slippery elm, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Peptic ulcers. Although there has been interest in using oral slippery elm for peptic ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of slippery elm for this purpose.
• Pharyngitis. It is unclear if lozenges containing slippery elm are beneficial in patients with sore throat. Details: Slippery elm has demulcent properties and, when added to lozenges, may soothe sore throats (272,512,1740). However, clinical research is lacking. More evidence is needed to rate slippery elm for these uses.

(Read more about SLIPPERY ELM)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when the leaves are used orally and appropriately, short-term (4,6,12).

LIKELY UNSAFE ...when large amounts are used long-term. Chronic ingestion of alfalfa has been associated with drug-induced lupus effects (381,14828,30602).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in medicinal amounts. Alfalfa contains constituents with possible estrogenic activity (4,11,30592).

(Read more about ALFALFA)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in food amounts. Eating apples and consuming apple juice is safe for most people. Apples are a common food source (3470,3472). However, eating apple seeds should be avoided because they can be toxic (6).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in food amounts. Eating apples and consuming apple juice is safe for most people. Apples are a common food source (3470,3472).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when apple pectin is used orally and appropriately, short-term. Preliminary clinical research suggests that combination products containing apple pectin and German chamomile (Diarrhoesan) are safe when used in infants for up to one week (19705,19706).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of apple in amounts greater than those found in foods during pregnancy and lactation; avoid using.

(Read more about APPLE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in food amounts (4819,4820,4821,5104,10166,10435,11134,11463,11986,92818). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of barley when used orally in medicinal amounts or when applied topically.

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (19).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when barley sprouts are consumed in relatively high doses. Excessive amounts of barley sprouts should not be consumed during pregnancy (19).

LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about BARLEY)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used in amounts commonly found in foods.

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately for medicinal purposes, short term. Beetroot juice has been safely used in clinical trials in doses of up to 500 mL daily for up to 7 days and a beetroot-based nutritional gel has been used safely in doses of up to 100 grams daily for 8 days (94461,94462,94464,100149,100152,100153).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of beets used medicinally during pregnancy and breast-feeding.

(Read more about BEET)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (7555,12928,12946,95817). However, excessive doses should be avoided. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: Age 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51+ years, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stone, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Other clinical studies suggest that, when combined with vitamin D supplementation, calcium supplementation is not associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Other analyses report conflicting results and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day, to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484), and to combine calcium supplementation with vitamin D supplementation (93533).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. The National Academy of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51 years and older, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Other clinical studies suggest that, when combined with vitamin D supplementation, calcium supplementation is not associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Other analyses report conflicting results and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients to not consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day, to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484), and to combine calcium supplementation with vitamin D supplementation (93533).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (17506).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (945,1586,3263,3264,17506). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prescribing oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancy to those with low dietary calcium intake to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the same daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age independent of pregnancy status: 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg (17506). Doses over these amounts might increase the risk of neonatal hypocalcemia-induced seizures possibly caused by transient neonatal hypoparathyroidism in the setting of excessive calcium supplementation during pregnancy, especially during the third trimester. Neonatal hypocalcemia is a risk factor for neonatal seizures (97345).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Cascara sagrada seems to be safe when used for less than one week (272,25023,40087). Cascara sagrada was formerly approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a safe and effective over-the-counter (OTC) laxative, but this designation was removed in 2002 due to a lack of supporting evidence (8229).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally, long-term. Using cascara sagrada for more than 1-2 weeks can lead to dependence, electrolyte loss, and hypokalemia (272).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in children. Cascara sagrada should be used cautiously in children due to the risk of electrolyte loss and hypokalemia (272).

PREGNANCY:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally. Cascara sagrada is excreted into breast milk and might cause diarrhea (272).

(Read more about CASCARA SAGRADA)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Tablets and liquids containing chlorella 3-10 grams or 60-100 mL daily have been safely used in clinical studies lasting 2-3 months (5890,92130,92131). Also, chlorella extract 200-1800 mg daily has been safely used in clinical research for 4-6 weeks (10388,92132). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of chlorella when used topically.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts for up to approximately 28 weeks. A commercially available chlorella supplement (Sun Chlorella A, Sun Chlorella Corp.) has been safely used in doses of 6 grams daily, starting during the 12-18th week of gestation and continuing until delivery (95013).

LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about CHLORELLA)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Ginger has been safely used in multiple clinical trials (721,722,723,5343,7048,7084,7085,7400,7623,11346)(12472,13080,13237,13244,17369,17928,17929,89889,89890,89894)(89895,89898,89899,90102,96252,96253,96259,96260,96669) (101760,101761,101762,103359,107903).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used topically and appropriately, short-term (89893,89897).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when consumed in the amounts typically found in foods.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately, short-term. Ginger powder has been used with apparent safety at a dose of up to 750 mg daily for 4 days in girls aged 14-18 years (96255).

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when consumed in the amounts typically found in foods. Ginger is considered a first-line nonpharmacological treatment option for nausea in pregnancy by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) (111601). However, it should not be used long-term or without medical supervision and close monitoring.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used for medicinal purposes. Despite some early reports of adverse effects (721,7083) and one observational study suggesting that taking dried ginger and other herbal supplements during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy marginally increased the chance of stillbirth (96254), most research shows that ginger is unlikely to cause harm to the baby. The risk for major malformations in infants of parents who took ginger when pregnant does not appear to be higher than the baseline rate of 1% to 3% (721,1922,5343,11346,13071,13080,96254). Also, other research suggests that ginger intake during various trimesters does not significantly affect the risk of spontaneous abortion, congenital malformations, stillbirth, perinatal death, preterm birth, low birth weight, or low Apgar scores (18211,90103). Ginger use has been associated with an increase in non-severe vaginal bleeding, including spotting, after week 17 of pregnancy (18211).

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when consumed in the amounts typically found in foods. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of ginger when used for medicinal purposes; avoid amounts greater than those found in foods.

(Read more about GINGER)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally as food (11358,11359). Glucomannan powder or flour is often used to enrich noodles in traditional Japanese foods.

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally with at least 250 mL (8 ounces) of water or other fluid. Glucomannan has been safely used in studies lasting up to 4 months (178,179,181,182,11046,11294,11357,11294,54240,57775)(57781,57783,57784,92004,92008,92009,92010,92011,106410). In the European Union, the maximum permitted level in foods is 10 grams/kg (106411).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally without any liquid, especially when in tablet form. There have been reports of choking and esophageal or gastrointestinal obstruction when glucomannan products are taken dry. A safety alert for this has been issued by Health Canada (11293,57785,106410).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately with at least 250 mL (8 ounces) of water or other fluid. Glucomannan has been safely used in children for up to 4 months (179,180,11295,57775,57779,92005,92006,97935).

CHILDREN: LIKELY UNSAFE
when used orally without any liquid, especially when in tablet form. There have been reports of esophageal and gastrointestinal obstruction when glucomannan products are taken dry (11293,57785,106410).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about GLUCOMANNAN)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Guar gum has been safely used in doses up to 15 grams daily for up to two years (10326,10897,12541,12543,12544,12548,54212,54245,54260,54275)(54333,93617,93619,93622,101888). Doses up to 20 grams daily have been safely used for up to 51 weeks (10896,12545,12547,54314). Guar gum has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status as a food additive in the US (4912).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Guar gum has been safely used in doses of 4-5 grams daily for 4 weeks in children 6-16 years of age (93605,93615). Guar gum 3 grams daily for 4 weeks has been safely used in children 4-6 years of age (93605).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts. Guar gum has been safely used at doses of 5-15 grams daily for up to 4 weeks during pregnancy (54209,54356).

LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of using medicinal amounts of guar gum during lactation; avoid using.

(Read more about GUAR GUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in amounts commonly found in foods. Gum arabic has Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) status for use in foods in the US. It is also considered to be safe for use as a food additive by the European Food Safety Authority (4912,105040).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts (8072). Up to 30 grams daily of powdered gum arabic has been used with apparent safety for 3 months (18237,99098,105040).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using in amounts greater than those found in foods (4912,105040).

(Read more about GUM ARABIC)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Karaya gum has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US when used as a stabilizing or thickening agent (4912).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally in medicinal amounts with adequate fluids (6). Karaya gum is a water-soluble, gel-forming fiber that is not systemically absorbed (11).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid use.

(Read more about KARAYA GUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Lactobacillus acidophilus has been safely used as part of multi-ingredient probiotic products in studies lasting up to nine months (1731,6087,14370,14371,90231,90296,92255,103438,12775,107581)(110950,110970,110979,110998,111785,111793). ...when used intravaginally and appropriately. L. acidophilus has been used safely in studies lasting up to 12 weeks (12108,13176,13177,90265). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of non-viable, heat-killed L. acidophilus formulations when used orally.

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately in children of most ages. Lactobacillus acidophilus has been safely used for up to 5 days (96887). Also, combination probiotics containing L. acidophilus have been used with apparent safety in various doses and durations. L. acidophilus has been combined with Bifidobacterium animalis (HOWARU Protect, Danisco) for up to 6 months in children 3-5 years old (16847), with Bifidobacterium bifidum for 6 weeks (90602,96890), with Bifidobacterium bifidum and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (Complete Probiotic Platinum) for 18 months in children 4 months to 5 years of age (103436), and in a specific product (Visbiome, ExeGi Pharma) containing a total of 8 species for 3 months in children 2-12 years old (107497). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of L. acidophilus in preterm infants with a birth weight under 1000 grams. Cases of bacteremia have occurred rarely in preterm infants given other probiotics (102416,111610,111612,111613,111850,111852,111853). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning about cases of serious infections caused by probiotics reported in very preterm or very low birth weight infants under 1000 grams (111610). Similarly, the American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the routine administration of probiotics to these infants due to conflicting data on safety and efficacy (111608).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. A combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum has been used with apparent safety for 6 weeks, starting at 24-28 weeks' gestation (95416,98430).

LACTATION:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of Lactobacillus acidophilus during lactation. However, there are currently no reasons to expect safety concerns when used appropriately.

(Read more about LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately in food amounts (4960,4969,5792,5797). Oat bran has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912). Whole grain oats 50-100 grams daily have been used for up to 1 year without serious adverse effects (97520).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used topically and appropriately (12). Lotion containing colloidal oat 1% has been used topically without adverse effects for up to 6 weeks (97518,103340). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of oats when used orally in medicinal amounts.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in food amounts (5792,5797).

(Read more about OATS)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used in amounts commonly found in foods. Pectin has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts greater than those typically found in food. Pectin 4.8 grams three times daily has been used for up to one year without serious adverse effects (12547,15019,15020,92481,108525).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally in amounts greater than those found in food, short-term. Pectin 4 grams/kg has been used daily for up to 7 days without reports of serious adverse effects (12575,19705).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used in amounts commonly found in foods. Pectin has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally in medicinal amounts (12577).

(Read more about PECTIN)

LIKELY SAFE ...when peppermint oil is used orally, topically, or rectally in medicinal doses. Peppermint oil has been safely used in multiple clinical trials (3801,3804,6190,6740,6741,10075,12009,13413,14467,17681)(17682,68522,96344,96360,96361,96362,96363,96364,96365,99493).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when peppermint leaf is used orally and appropriately, short-term. There is some clinical research showing that peppermint leaf can be used safely for up to 8 weeks (12724,13413). The long-term safety of peppermint leaf in medicinal doses is unknown. ...when peppermint oil is used by inhalation as aromatherapy (7107). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of using intranasal peppermint oil.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY SAFE
when used orally for medicinal purposes. Enteric-coated peppermint oil capsules have been used with apparent safety under medical supervision in children 8 years of age and older (4469).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (96361). There is insufficient information available about the safety of using peppermint in medicinal amounts during pregnancy or lactation; avoid using.

(Read more about PEPPERMINT)

LIKELY SAFE ...when the fruit is used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (13622).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when the fruit is used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts (6481,9796). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of red raspberry leaf when used orally or topically.

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when the fruit is used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (13622).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY SAFE
when red raspberry leaf is used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts during late pregnancy under the supervision of a healthcare provider. Red raspberry leaf is used by nurse midwives to facilitate delivery. There is some evidence that red raspberry leaf in doses of up to 2.4 grams daily, beginning at 32 weeks' gestation and continued until delivery, can be safely used for this purpose (6481,9796). Make sure patients do not use red raspberry leaf without the guidance of a healthcare professional.

PREGNANCY: LIKELY UNSAFE
when red raspberry leaf is used orally in medicinal amounts throughout pregnancy or for self-treatment. Red raspberry leaf might have estrogenic effects (6180). These effects can adversely affect pregnancy. Tell pregnant patients not to use red raspberry leaf at any time during pregnancy without the close supervision of a healthcare provider.

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when the fruit is used orally in amounts commonly found in foods (13622). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of red raspberry leaf; avoid using.

(Read more about RED RASPBERRY)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately (4,12,272,512,1740).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using. Slippery elm bark has historically been inserted into the cervix to induce abortion. As a result, slippery elm has been reported in some sources to have abortifacient activity. However, there is no reliable information available about whether slippery elm has abortifacient activity when taken orally.

(Read more about SLIPPERY ELM)

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, alfalfa might increase the risk of hypoglycemia when taken with antidiabetes drugs.  Details Animal research suggests that alfalfa decreases blood sugar in diabetic mice (30605). Also, in one case report, a diabetic patient experienced hypoglycemia after consuming alfalfa extract (30608). Monitor blood glucose levels closely. Dose adjustments might be necessary.

CONTRACEPTIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, alfalfa might interfere with the activity of contraceptive drugs.  Details Alfalfa contains coumestrol, a phytoestrogen, and isoflavonoids, which have estrogenic effects (4,30592).

ESTROGENS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, alfalfa might interfere with hormone therapy.  Details Alfalfa contains coumestrol, a phytoestrogen, and isoflavonoids, which have estrogenic effects (4,30592).

IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, alfalfa might decrease the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy.  Details In vitro research and human case reports suggest that alfalfa may have immunostimulant effects (12174,14828,14829).

PHOTOSENSITIZING DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use of alfalfa with photosensitizing drugs might have additive effects.  Details Animal research suggests that excessive doses of alfalfa may increase photosensitivity, possibly due to its chlorophyll content (106043). It is unclear if this effect would be clinically relevant in humans.

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, alfalfa might reduce the anticoagulant activity of warfarin.  Details Alfalfa contains a large amount of vitamin K (4,6). This could theoretically interfere with the activity of warfarin.

(Read more about ALFALFA)

ALISKIREN (Tekturna, Rasilez) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Concomitant consumption of apple juice can significantly decrease oral absorption and blood levels of aliskiren.  Details Pharmacokinetic research shows that coadministration of apple juice 200 mL along with aliskiren 150 mg decreases the bioavailability of aliskiren by 63% (17670). Apple juice seems to inhibit organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP), which is involved in drug uptake in the gut, liver, and kidney (7046,94413). It is thought that apple juice might affect OATP for only a short time. Therefore, separating drug administration and consumption of apple juice by at least 4 hours might avoid this interaction (17603,17604).

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, consuming apple juice with antidiabetes drugs might interfere with blood glucose control.  Details Clinical research suggests that consuming apples or drinking apple juice can raise blood glucose levels, with the effects of drinking apple juice being more significant than consuming apples (31699).

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Consuming apple juice with antihypertensive drugs might interfere with blood pressure control.  Details Some clinical evidence suggests that consuming apple and cherry juice can increase blood pressure in elderly patients (31680).

ATENOLOL (Tenormin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Concomitant consumption of apple juice can significantly decrease oral absorption and blood levels of atenolol.  Details Pharmacokinetic research shows that coadministration of apple juice 600-1200 mL decreases levels of atenolol by 58% to 82% in a dose-dependent manner (17999). Apple juice seems to inhibit organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP), which is involved in drug uptake in the gut, liver, and kidney (7046). It is thought that apple juice might affect OATP for only a short time. Therefore, separating drug administration and consumption of apple juice by at least 4 hours might avoid this interaction (17603,17604).

FEXOFENADINE (Allegra) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = B Concomitant consumption of apple juice can significantly decrease oral absorption and blood levels of fexofenadine.  Details Pharmacokinetic research shows that coadministration of apple juice 400-1200 mL along with fexofenadine 60-120 mg decreases bioavailability of fexofenadine by up to 78% (7046,94413). Coadministration with smaller quantities of apple juice (150 mL or less) does not appear to affect the bioavailability of fexofenadine (94421). Apple juice seems to inhibit organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP), which is involved in drug uptake in the gut, liver, and kidney (7046,94413). It is thought that apple juice might affect OATP for only a short time. Therefore, separating drug administration and consumption of apple juice by at least 4 hours might avoid this interaction (17603,17604).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D There is some concern that concomitant consumption of apple juice might decrease oral absorption and blood levels of lithium.  Details In one case report, a patient had an undetectable serum lithium level when lithium citrate was administered with apple juice. When lithium was administered with an alternative beverage, the lithium level became detectable and the patient demonstrated clinical improvement (105342).

ORGANIC ANION-TRANSPORTING POLYPEPTIDE SUBSTRATES (OATP) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Likely •  Level of Evidence = B Concomitant consumption of apple juice can significantly decrease oral absorption and blood levels of OATP substrates.  Details Research shows that consuming apple juice inhibits OATP, which reduces bioavailability of oral drugs that are substrates of OATP (7046,17605). Fexofenadine, atenolol, and aliskiren are substrates of OATP. Clinical research shows that coadministration of apple juice decreases bioavailability of fexofenadine by up to 78% (7046,94413), aliskiren by 63% (17670), and atenolol by up to 82% (17999). These effects appear to increase with larger quantities of apple juice. It is thought that apple juice might affect OATP for only a short time. Therefore, separating drug administration and consumption of apple juice by at least 4 hours might avoid this interaction (17603,17604).

(Read more about APPLE)

TRICLABENDAZOLE (Egaten) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, barley might decrease the clinical effects of triclabendazole.  Details Animal research suggests that a diet supplemented with barley can reduce the bioavailability of triclabendazole when taken concomitantly (23884). This effect has not been shown in humans.

(Read more about BARLEY)

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, beet might decrease the levels and clinical effects of CYP1A2 substrates.  Details In vitro research suggests that beet induces CYP1A2 enzymes (111404).

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, beet might increase the levels of CYP3A4 substrates.  Details In vitro research suggests that betanin, the major pigment in beet, competitively inhibits CYP3A4 in a dose-dependent manner similarly to strong CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole (113425).

(Read more about BEET)

ALUMINUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium citrate might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity. Other types of calcium do not increase aluminum absorption.  Details Calcium citrate can increase the absorption of aluminum when taken with aluminum hydroxide. The increase in aluminum levels may become toxic, particularly in individuals with kidney disease (21631). However, the effect of calcium citrate on aluminum absorption is due to the citrate anion rather than calcium cation. Calcium acetate does not appear to increase aluminum absorption (93006).

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.  Details Advise patients to take bisphosphonates at least 30 minutes before calcium, but preferably at a different time of day. Calcium supplements decrease absorption of bisphosphonates (12937).

CALCIPOTRIENE (Dovonex) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Taking calcipotriene with calcium might increase the risk for hypercalcemia.  Details Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (12938). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with calcium supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Intravenous calcium may decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers; oral calcium is unlikely to have this effect.  Details Intravenous calcium is used to decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers in the management of overdose. Intravenous calcium gluconate has been used before intravenous verapamil (Isoptin) to prevent or reduce the hypotensive effects without affecting the antiarrhythmic effects (6124). But there is no evidence that dietary or supplemental calcium when taken orally interacts with calcium channel blockers (12939,12947).

CEFTRIAXONE (Rocephin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Co-administration of intravenous calcium and ceftriaxone can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys.  Details Avoid administering intravenous calcium in any form, such as parenteral nutrition or Lactated Ringers, within 48 hours of intravenous ceftriaxone. Case reports in neonates show that administering intravenous ceftriaxone and calcium can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys. In several cases, neonates have died as a result of this interaction (15794,21632). So far there are no reports in adults; however, there is still concern that this interaction might occur in adults.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Using intravenous calcium with digoxin might increase the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias.  Details Hypercalcemia increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with digoxin (12940). However, one retrospective analysis of clinical data suggests that intravenous calcium does not increase the risk of dysrhythmias or mortality in patients receiving digoxin (38960).

DILTIAZEM (Cardizem, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, calcium might increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of diltiazem.

DOLUTEGRAVIR (Tivicay) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of dolutegravir.  Details Advise patients to take dolutegravir either 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium carbonate 1200 mg concomitantly with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces plasma levels of dolutegravir by almost 40%. Calcium appears to decrease levels of dolutegravir through chelation (93578).

ELVITEGRAVIR (Vitekta) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of elvitegravir.  Details Advise patients to take elvitegravir either 2 hours before or 2 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium along with elvitegravir can reduce blood levels of elvitegravir through chelation (94166).

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption and effectiveness of levothyroxine.  Details Advise patients to take levothyroxine and calcium supplements at least 4 hours apart. Calcium reduces levothyroxine absorption, probably by forming insoluble complexes (5082). Calcium carbonate supplements reduce effectiveness of levothyroxine in patients with hypothyroidism (5081,5082,6137).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use of calcium and lithium may increase this risk of hypercalcemia.  Details Clinical research suggests that long-term use of lithium may cause hypercalcemia in 10% to 60% of patients (38953). Theoretically, concomitant use of lithium and calcium supplements may further increase this risk.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of quinolone antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral quinolones at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements or calcium-fortified foods. Taking calcium at the same time as oral quinolones can reduce quinolone absorption. Calcium binds to quinolones in the gut (4412,10339,21638,38570).

RALTEGRAVIR (Isentress) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium may reduce levels of raltegravir.  Details Pharmacokinetic research shows that taking a single dose of calcium carbonate 3000 mg along with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily modestly decreases the mean area under the curve of raltegravir, but the decrease does not necessitate a dose adjustment of raltegravir (94164). However, a case of elevated HIV-1 RNA levels and documented resistance to raltegravir has been reported for a patient taking calcium carbonate 1 gram three times daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU three times daily in combination with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 11 months. It is thought that calcium reduced raltegravir levels by chelation, leading to treatment failure (94165).

SOTALOL (Betapace) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of sotalol.  Details Advise patients to separate doses by at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium. Calcium appears to reduce the absorption of sotalol, probably by forming insoluble complexes (10018).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral tetracyclines at least 2 hours before, or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements. Taking calcium at the same time as oral tetracyclines can reduce tetracycline absorption. Calcium binds to tetracyclines in the gut (1843).

THIAZIDE DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Taking calcium along with thiazides might increase the risk of hypercalcemia and renal failure.  Details Thiazides reduce calcium excretion by the kidneys (1902). Using thiazides along with moderately large amounts of calcium carbonate increases the risk of milk-alkali syndrome (hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis, renal failure). Patients may need to have their serum calcium levels and/or parathyroid function monitored regularly.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, use of calcium supplements may increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of verapamil.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

CORTICOSTEROIDS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cascara sagrada might increase the risk of hypokalemia when taken with corticosteroids.  Details Cascara sagrada has stimulant laxative effects, and long-term use has been associated with hypokalemia (2,4).

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Insignificant •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cascara sagrada might decrease the effects of CYP3A4 substrates.  Details In vitro research suggests that cascara sagrada can induce CYP3A4 enzymes, albeit to a much lower degree than rifampin, a known CYP3A4 inducer (110704).

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cascara sagrada might cause hypokalemia, potentially increasing the risk of digoxin toxicity.  Details Cascara sagrada has stimulant laxative effects, and long-term use has been associated with hypokalemia (4,19).

DIURETIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cascara sagrada might increase the risk of hypokalemia when taken with diuretic drugs.  Details Cascara sagrada has stimulant laxative effects, and long-term use has been associated with hypokalemia (4,19).

STIMULANT LAXATIVES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cascara sagrada might have additive adverse effects when taken with stimulant laxatives.  Details Cascara sagrada has stimulant laxative effects and might compound fluid and electrolyte losses when taken with stimulant laxatives (19).

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, cascara sagrada might increase the risk of bleeding when taken with warfarin.  Details Cascara sagrada has stimulant laxative effects (19). In some people, cascara sagrada can cause diarrhea. Diarrhea can increase the effects of warfarin, increase international normalized ratio (INR), and increase the risk of bleeding.

(Read more about CASCARA SAGRADA)

PHOTOSENSITIZING DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, chlorella might have additive effects with photosensitizing drugs.  Details Chlorella has been reported to cause photosensitization (3900,5852). In five case reports, patients who had ingested chlorella exhibited swelling followed by erythematopurpuric lesions on sun-exposed areas of the body (5852). Theoretically, concomitant use with photosensitizing drugs may exacerbate effects.

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, chlorella might reduce the clinical effects of warfarin.  Details Chlorella contains significant amounts of vitamin K. There is at least one case report of warfarin therapy becoming sub-therapeutic after initiation of chlorella supplements (3900,41830).

(Read more about CHLORELLA)

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Ginger may have antiplatelet effects and may increase the risk of bleeding if used with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs. However, research is conflicting.  Details Laboratory research suggests that ginger inhibits thromboxane synthetase and decreases platelet aggregation (7622,12634,20321,20322,20323,96257). However, this has not been demonstrated unequivocally in humans, with mixed results from clinical trials (96257). Theoretically, excessive amounts of ginger might increase the risk of bleeding when used with anticoagulant/antiplatelet drugs.

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking ginger with antidiabetes drugs might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.  Details Animal and human research suggests that ginger might increase insulin levels and/or decrease blood glucose levels (12636,20402,20403,20404,20405,89895,89896,107898).

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking ginger with calcium channel blockers might increase the risk of hypotension.  Details Some animal and in vitro research suggests that ginger has hypotensive and calcium channel-blocking effects (12633). Another animal study shows that concomitant administration of ginger and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine leads to greater reductions in blood pressure when compared with amlodipine alone (107901).

CYCLOSPORINE (Neoral, Sandimmune) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, when taken prior to cyclosporine, ginger might decrease cyclosporine levels.  Details In an animal model, ginger juice taken 2 hours prior to cyclosporine administration reduced the maximum concentration and area under the curve of cyclosporine by 51% and 40%, respectively. This effect was not observed when ginger juice and cyclosporine were administered at the same time (20401).

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Insignificant •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, ginger might increase the levels of CYP1A2 substrates.  Details In vitro research shows that ginger inhibits CYP1A2 activity (111544). However, this interaction has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 2B6 (CYP2B6) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Insignificant •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, ginger might increase the levels of CYP2B6 substrates.  Details In vitro research shows that ginger inhibits CYP2B6 activity (111544). However, this interaction has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Insignificant •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, ginger might increase the levels of CYP2C9 substrates.  Details In vitro research shows that ginger inhibits CYP2C9 activity (111544). However, this interaction has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Ginger might increase or decrease the levels of CYP3A4 substrates.  Details In vitro research and some case reports suggest that ginger inhibits CYP3A4 activity (111544,111644). Three case reports from the World Health Organization (WHO) adverse drug reaction database describe increased toxicity in patients taking ginger and cancer medications that are CYP3A4 substrates (imatinib, dabrafenib, and crizotinib). However, the causality of this interaction is unclear due to the presence of multiple interacting drugs and routes of administration (111644). Conversely, other in vitro research suggests that ginger induces CYP3A4 activity, leading to reduced levels of CYP3A4 substrates (111404). However, this interaction has not been reported in humans.

LOSARTAN (Cozaar) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, ginger might increase levels of losartan and the risk of hypotension.  Details In animal research, ginger increased the levels and hypotensive effects of a single dose of losartan (102459). It is not clear if ginger alters the concentration or effects of losartan when taken continuously. Additionally, this interaction has not been shown in humans.

METRONIDAZOLE (Flagyl) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, ginger might increase levels of metronidazole.  Details In an animal model, ginger increased the absorption and plasma half-life of metronidazole. In addition, the elimination rate and clearance of metronidazole was significantly reduced (20350).

NIFEDIPINE (Procardia) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Ginger may have antiplatelet effects and increase the risk of bleeding if used with nifedipine.  Details Clinical research shows that combined treatment with ginger 1 gram plus nifedipine 10 mg significantly inhibits platelet aggregation when compared to nifedipine or ginger alone (20324).

P-GLYCOPROTEIN SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Ginger might increase the absorption and blood levels of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrates.  Details In vitro research and case reports suggest that ginger inhibits drug efflux by P-gp, potentially increasing absorption and serum levels of P-gp substrates (111544,111644). Two case reports from the World Health Organization (WHO) adverse drug reaction database describe increased toxicity in patients taking ginger and cancer medications that are P-gp substrates (trametinib, crizotinib). However, the causality of this interaction is unclear due to the presence of multiple interacting drugs and routes of administration (111644).

PHENPROCOUMON (Marcoumar, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Ginger might increase the risk of bleeding with phenprocoumon.  Details Phenprocoumon, a warfarin-related anticoagulant, might increase the international normalized ratio (INR) when taken with ginger. There is one case report of a 76-year-old woman with a stable INR on phenprocoumon that increased to greater than 10 when she began consuming dried ginger and ginger tea (12880).

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Ginger might increase the risk of bleeding with warfarin.  Details Laboratory research suggests that ginger might inhibit thromboxane synthetase and decrease platelet aggregation (7622,12634,20321,20322,20323). In one case report, ginger increased the INR when taken with phenprocoumon, which has similar pharmacological effects as warfarin (12880). In another case report, ginger increased the INR when taken with a combination of warfarin, hydrochlorothiazide, and acetaminophen (20349). A longitudinal analysis suggests that taking ginger increases the risk of bleeding in patients taking warfarin for at least 4 months (20348). However, research in healthy people suggests that ginger has no effect on INR, or the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of warfarin (12881,15176). Until more is known, monitor INRs closely in patients taking large amounts of ginger.

(Read more about GINGER)

ORAL DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, glucomannan may decrease absorption of drugs taken orally.  Details Due to its viscosity and bulking effects, there is concern that glucomannan can decrease the absorption of oral drugs. A small clinical study in healthy volunteers shows that taking glyburide 2.5 mg plus glucomannan 3.9 grams with breakfast reduces plasma levels of glyburide when compared with breakfast and glyburide alone (11360). In addition, animal research demonstrates this effect on amoxicillin, but shows increased absorption of metronidazole. This mouse model also demonstrates that metronidazole elimination is prolonged, but amoxicillin elimination is enhanced by 38%; glucomannan may also affect the distribution of some drugs (112703). To avoid changes in absorption, take glucomannan 30-60 minutes after taking oral drugs.

(Read more about GLUCOMANNAN)

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Insignificant •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Guar gum might slow digoxin absorption, but it does not seem to impact how much digoxin is absorbed overall.  Details Two small studies in healthy volunteers show no change in the overall extent of digoxin absorption, although early absorption was slowed, when taken with guar gum (533,25074).

ETHINYL ESTRADIOL Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, guar gum might reduce the absorption of ethinyl estradiol, potentially decreasing its effectiveness.  Details Animal research shows that taking guar gum with ethinyl estradiol decreases ethinyl estradiol absorption (12421). However, this effect has not been reported in humans.

METFORMIN (Glucophage) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Guar gum might reduce the absorption of metformin, potentially decreasing its effectiveness.  Details A small study in healthy volunteers shows that guar gum reduces the absorption rate of metformin (532,12546).

ORAL DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Guar gum might reduce the absorption of some oral drugs, potentially decreasing their effectiveness.  Details Clinical research shows that guar gum reduces or slows absorption of medications such as penicillin and metformin (532,533). To avoid changes in absorption, take guar gum 30-60 minutes after oral medications.

PENICILLIN Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Guar gum might reduce the absorption of penicillin, potentially decreasing its effectiveness.  Details A small clinical study in healthy volunteers shows that taking guar gum with penicillin results in decreased penicillin absorption and reduced penicillin levels (533).

(Read more about GUAR GUM)

AMOXICILLIN (Amoxil, Trimox) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Gum arabic can reduce the absorption of amoxicillin.  Details A small study in healthy volunteers shows that taking amoxicillin and gum arabic concurrently significantly reduces the absorption of amoxicillin. Separate doses of amoxicillin from gum arabic by at least 2 hours (12654).

ORAL DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, gum arabic can alter the absorption of oral drugs due to its fiber content.  Details Gum arabic has been used as a suspending osmotic agent in drug formulations. It might improve bioavailability of water-insoluble drugs like naproxen, but reduce absorption of polar drugs like amoxicillin (12654,104058). To avoid changes in absorption, take gum arabic 30-60 minutes after oral medications.

(Read more about GUM ARABIC)

(Read more about KARAYA GUM)

ANTIBIOTIC DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking Lactobacillus acidophilus with antibiotic drugs might decrease the effectiveness of L. acidophilus.  Details L. acidophilus preparations usually contain live and active organisms. Therefore, simultaneously taking antibiotics might kill a significant number of the organisms (1740). Tell patients to separate administration of antibiotics and L. acidophilus preparations by at least two hours.

(Read more about LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS)

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, oats may have additive effects with antidiabetic agents and might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.  Details Consuming oats can decrease blood glucose in patients with diabetes (4980,4982,6266,103345). In those who require insulin, taking oats 100 grams daily for 2 days reduces the insulin dose required to achieve metabolic control (103336).

INSULIN Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Concomitant use of oats and insulin might increase the risk of hypoglycemia.  Details In patients with insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes, taking oats 100 grams daily for 2 days reduces the insulin dose required to achieve metabolic control (103336).

(Read more about OATS)

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, pectin might reduce the absorption of digoxin, potentially decreasing its effectiveness.  Details A small clinical study shows that taking digoxin with a kaolin-pectin suspension reduces the absorption of digoxin by about 62% (2212). It is unclear if these effects are due to pectin, kaolin, or the combination.

LOVASTATIN (Mevacor) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, pectin might reduce the absorption of lovastatin, potentially decreasing its effectiveness.  Details Case reports suggest that concomitant use of pectin and lovastatin might reduce the cholesterol-lowering effect of lovastatin, possibly due to reduced intestinal absorption of lovastatin (615).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, pectin might reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics, potentially decreasing their effectiveness.  Details A small clinical study shows that taking tetracycline with bismuth subsalicylate in a kaolin-pectin suspension reduces the absorption of tetracycline by about 34% (2213). It is unclear if these effects are due to pectin, kaolin, bismuth subsalicylate, or the combination.

(Read more about PECTIN)

CYCLOSPORINE (Neoral, Sandimmune) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, peppermint oil might increase the levels and adverse effects of cyclosporine.  Details In animal research, peppermint oil inhibits cyclosporine metabolism and increases cyclosporine levels. Inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) may be partially responsible for this interaction (11784). An interaction between peppermint oil and cyclosporine has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, peppermint might increase the levels of CYP1A2 substrates.  Details In vitro and animal research shows that peppermint oil and peppermint leaf inhibit CYP1A2 (12479,12734). However, in clinical research, peppermint tea did not significantly affect the metabolism of caffeine, a CYP1A2 substrate. It is possible that the 6-day duration of treatment may have been too short to identify a difference (96359).

CYTOCHROME P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, peppermint might increase the levels of CYP2C19 substrates.  Details In vitro research shows that peppermint oil inhibits CYP2C19 (12479). So far, this interaction has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, peppermint might increase the levels of CYP2C9 substrates.  Details In vitro research shows that peppermint oil inhibits CYP2C9 (12479). So far, this interaction has not been reported in humans.

CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) SUBSTRATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, peppermint might increase the levels of CYP3A4 substrates.  Details Clinical research in healthy volunteers shows that a single dose of peppermint oil 600 mg inhibits CYP3A4 enzymes and increases the AUC of felodipine, a CYP3A4 substrate (11783). However, in vitro research suggests that peppermint oil only inhibits CYP3A4 at very high concentrations (12479).

(Read more about PEPPERMINT)

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, taking red raspberry leaf with anticoagulant/antiplatelet drugs might increase the risk of bleeding.  Details In vitro research suggests that red raspberry leaf extract has antiplatelet activity and enhances the in vitro effects of the antiplatelet medication cangrelor (96300). This interaction has not been reported in humans.

INSULIN Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Red raspberry leaf might reduce glucose levels in patients being treated with insulin.  Details In one case report, a 38-year-old patient with gestational diabetes, whose blood glucose was being controlled with medical nutrition therapy and insulin, developed hypoglycemia after consuming two servings of raspberry leaf tea daily for 3 days beginning at 32 weeks' gestation. The patient required an insulin dose reduction. The hypoglycemia was considered to be probably related to use of red raspberry leaf tea (96299).

(Read more about RED RASPBERRY)

ORAL DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, slippery elm may slow the absorption and reduce serum levels of oral drugs.  Details Slippery elm inner bark contains mucilage, which may interfere with the absorption of orally administered drugs (19).

(Read more about SLIPPERY ELM)

General ...Orally, alfalfa leaf seems to be well tolerated. However, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal discomfort, diarrhea, and flatulence.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Lupus-like syndrome after chronic ingestion of alfalfa.

Dermatologic ...Dermatitis associated with alfalfa use has been reported. In a 1954 publication, dermatitis was noted in a 61-year-old female consuming 4-6 cups of tea made with two tablespoonfuls of alfalfa seeds for approximately two months prior to onset. Examination revealed diffuse, confluent edema and erythema on the face, eyelids, ears, hands, forearms, and distal humeral regions. The dermatitis improved with treatment; re-exposure to alfalfa resulted in a similar reaction (30609).

Endocrine ...Alfalfa contains constituents, including coumestrol, with reported estrogenic activity (30586,30592,4753). Effects in humans are not known.
One case report documents hypokalemia in a female who had been drinking a "cleansing tea" containing alfalfa, licorice, and stinging nettle. The potassium level returned to normal after discontinuing the tea and initiating potassium supplementation. The specific cause of the hypokalemia is not clear. Notably, both stinging nettle and licorice have been associated with hypokalemia and may have been responsible for this effect (30562).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, flatulence and bulkier feces were reported during the first week of a case series of three subjects ingesting alfalfa (30598). In a case series of 15 patients ingesting alfalfa, increased fecal volume and increased stool frequency was reported. Additional adverse effects included abdominal discomfort in two patients, diarrhea in two patients, loose stools in six patients, and intestinal gas in 13 patients (5816).

Hematologic ...Pancytopenia and splenomegaly were reported in a 59-year-old male who had been taking 80-160 grams of ground alfalfa seeds for up to six weeks at a time, for a five month period. Hematologic values and spleen size returned to normal when alfalfa was discontinued (381).

Other ...Alfalfa products, including sprouts, seeds, and tablets, have been found to be contaminated with Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes, which have caused documented infections (5600,30566,30568,30572,30569,30564,30604,30610,30563,30607) (30566,30564,30604,30610,30563,30607,30576).
Orally, alfalfa has been associated with the development of a lupus-like syndrome in animals and humans (30594,14828,14830,30602), as well as with possible exacerbations of lupus in patients with known systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). These reactions may be associated with the amino acid L-canavanine (30594), which appears to be present in alfalfa seeds and sprouts, but not leaves, and therefore should not be present in alfalfa tablets manufactured from the leaves (30601). However, case reports have included individuals ingesting tablets. A lupus-like syndrome was described in four patients taking 12-24 alfalfa tablets per day. Symptoms included arthralgias, myalgias, and rash; positive antinuclear antibodies (ANA) arose anywhere from three weeks to seven months after initiating alfalfa therapy. Upon discontinuation of alfalfa tablets, all four patients became asymptomatic. In two patients, ANA levels normalized (14828). Two additional reports have documented possible exacerbation or induction of SLE associated with alfalfa use. One case involved a female with a 26-year history of SLE, who had been taking 15 tablets of alfalfa daily for nine months prior to an exacerbation. Because of the delay in onset of the exacerbation from the initiation of alfalfa therapy, causation cannot be clearly established (30575). In a different report, SLE and arthritis were found in multiple family members who had been taking a combination of vitamin E and alfalfa tablets for seven years (30602). It is not known what other environmental or genetic factors may have affected these individuals, and the association with alfalfa is unclear.

(Read more about ALFALFA)

General ...Orally, apple fruit is well tolerated. Apple seeds, which contain cyanide, may cause serious adverse effects when consumed in large amounts.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Bloating, flatulence.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. Ingestion of large amounts of apple seeds may cause cyanide poisoning, leading to death.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, apple products, including whole apples, apple puree, and apple juice, may cause bloating and flatulence in some people (104184).

Immunologic ...Patients allergic to other fruits in the Rosaceae family, including apricot, almond, plum, peach, pear, and strawberry, can also be allergic to apples (7129). Rarely, the allergy has resulted in anaphylaxis (94425).

Other ...Orally, ingestion of large amounts of apple seeds, which contain hydrogen cyanide (HCN), may cause cyanide poisoning, leading to death. One death is attributed to ingestion of a cupful of apple seeds. To release cyanide, seeds must be hydrolyzed in the stomach, and several hours may elapse before poisoning symptoms occur (6).

(Read more about APPLE)

General ...Orally, barley is well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal distension, bloating, flatulence, unpleasant taste. Allergic reactions in sensitive individuals.
Topically: Allergic reactions in sensitive individuals.

Dermatologic ...Topically, barley malt contained in beer has been reported to cause contact dermatitis (33762). After occupational exposure, barley has been reported to cause contact dermatitis of the eyelids and extremities, as well as contact urticaria (33735,33770,33774).

Gastrointestinal ...When consumed orally, barley provides fiber. Increasing fiber in the diet can cause flatulence, bloating, abdominal distention, and unpleasant taste. To minimize side effects, doses should be slowly titrated to the desired level. Adverse effects usually subside with continued use (12514).
Barley contains gluten. In patients with biopsy-proven celiac disease, consuming barley can cause gastrointestinal upset and impairment of xylose excretion (33763,33772).

Immunologic ...Orally, consumption of beer has been reported to cause allergic reactions in sensitive individuals (33722,33724). Symptoms included tingling in the face, lip, and tongue, angioedema, generalized urticaria, chest tightness, dyspnea, cough, fainting, and rhinoconjunctivitis. It can also cause anaphylaxis in sensitive individuals (317). Topically and with occupational exposure, barley has been reported to cause contact dermatitis and rash (33762,33735,33770,33774).
"Bakers' asthma" is an allergic response resulting from the inhalation of cereal flours by workers in the baking and milling industries, and has been reported to occur after barley flour exposure (1300,33756,33760). Cross-allergenicity has been shown to exist between different cereals (33758).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ..."Bakers' asthma" is an allergic response resulting from the inhalation of cereal flours by workers in the baking and milling industries, and has been reported to occur after barley flour exposure (1300,33756,33760). Cross-allergenicity has been shown to exist between different cereals (33758).
By inhalation, barley flours may be a source of allergens in asthma (33764,33773). Inhalation of wild barley grass pollen may result in bronchial irritation or pneumonitis (33726,33755).

(Read more about BARLEY)

General ...Orally, beet seems to be well tolerated when used for medicinal purposes, short term.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Red stools and red urine.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Hypocalcemia and kidney damage when ingested in large amounts.

Endocrine ...Theoretically, ingestion of large quantities of beets could lead to hypocalcemia because of the oxaluric acid content (18).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, beet juice may cause red stools (94470,97726,100142,100145,105762). This red coloring of the stools is not harmful. Additionally, beet supplementation has been reported to cause black stools. In one case, a 79-year-old male on apixaban and clopidogrel presented with black stools, nausea, and vomiting after taking beet pills 2-3 days prior. The likelihood of upper gastrointestinal bleed was determined to be low based on factors such as normal vital signs and lack of severe anemia. The patient was diagnosed with beet-induced pseudo-hematochezia which was successfully treated with fluids and discontinuation of the beet supplement (113426).
Other less common gastrointestinal side effects include loose stools, constipation, and nausea (100149).

Genitourinary ...Orally, beet is known to produce red or pink urine (beeturia) in some people (32569,34134,94464,94470,97725,97726,100142,100145,100152,105762,113422). However, this red coloring of the urine is not harmful and dissipates after about 12 hours (113422).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, vivid dreams and worsening headaches have each occurred in one person in a clinical trial, although it is not clear if this is due to beet (97723).

Renal ...Theoretically, ingestion of large quantities of beets could lead to kidney damage due to its oxaluric acid content (18).

(Read more about BEET)

General ...Orally and intravenously, calcium is well-tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Belching, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, and stomach upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about calciphylaxis and kidney stones.

Cardiovascular ...There has been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these results, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and CVD, CHD, or MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482). To minimize the possible risk of CVD, CHD, or MI, advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). While dietary intake of calcium is preferred over supplemental intake, advise patients who require calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D, as this combination does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI (93533).
Rarely, calcium intake can increase the risk of calciphylaxis, which usually occurs in patients with kidney failure. Calciphylaxis is the deposition of calcium phosphate in arterioles, which causes skin ulcers and skin necrosis. In a case report, a 64-year-old female with a history of neck fracture, sepsis, and ischemic colitis presented with painful leg ulcers due to calciphylaxis. She discontinued calcium and vitamin D supplementation and was treated with sodium thiosulfate and supportive care (95816).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, calcium can cause belching, flatulence, nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, and diarrhea (1824,1843,12950,38803). Although constipation is frequently cited as an adverse effect of calcium, there is no scientific substantiation of this side effect (1824,1843,1844,1845,12950,38978). Calcium carbonate has been reported to cause acid rebound, but this is controversial (12935,12936).

Oncologic ...There is some concern that very high doses of calcium might increase the risk of prostate cancer. Some epidemiological evidence suggests that consuming over 2000 mg/day of dietary calcium might increase the risk for prostate cancer (4825,12949). Additional research suggests that calcium intake over 1500 mg/day might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer and prostate cancer mortality (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a small increase in prostate cancer risk (98894). However, contradictory research suggests no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall prostate cancer risk (14131,14132,104630). More evidence is needed to determine the effect of calcium, if any, on prostate cancer risk.

Renal ...Kidney stones have been reported in individuals taking calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily in combination with vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 4 years (93943).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

General ...Orally, cascara sagrada seem to be well tolerated when used appropriately, short-term.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Mild abdominal discomfort and cramps.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Hepatotoxicity. Fresh or improperly aged cascara sagrada bark can cause severe vomiting.

Endocrine ...Orally, long-term use of cascara sagrada can lead to potassium depletion (4).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, cascara sagrada can commonly cause mild abdominal discomfort, colic, and cramps (4). In some cases, chronic use can cause pseudomelanosis coli. Pseudomelanosis coli (pigment spots in intestinal mucosa) is believed to be harmless, usually reverses with discontinuation, and is not directly associated with an increased risk of developing colorectal adenoma or carcinoma (6138).
Fresh or improperly aged cascara sagrada bark can cause severe vomiting due to the presence of free anthrone constituents (2,92307).

Genitourinary ...Orally, long-term use of cascara sagrada can lead to albuminuria and hematuria (4).

Hepatic ...There is some concern about potential liver problems with cascara sagrada. In some cases, cascara sagrada bark 750-1275 mg (containing approximately 21 mg cascaroside) daily in divided doses for three days resulted in cholestatic hepatitis, ascites, and portal hypertension. Symptoms resolved following discontinuation of cascara sagrada (6895,92306).

Musculoskeletal ...Orally, long-term use of cascara sagrada can lead to muscle weakness and finger clubbing (4).

Other ...Orally, long-term use of cascara sagrada can lead to cachexia (4).

(Read more about CASCARA SAGRADA)

General ...Orally, chlorella is generally well-tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Allergic reactions, abdominal cramping, constipation, diarrhea, fatigue, flatus, nausea, photosensitivity, and stool discoloration.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Anaphylaxis.

Dermatologic ...Orally, photosensitivity reactions have occurred following ingestion of chlorella (3900,5852). According to case reports, five patients who had ingested chlorella exhibited swelling followed by erythematopurpuric lesions on sun-exposed areas of the body (5852). The photosensitizing agent in the chlorella tablets was identified as pheophorbide-a and its ester.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, chlorella can cause diarrhea, abdominal cramping, flatus, and nausea, especially during the first two weeks of treatment (5890,6804,92130,92132). In one clinical trial, one out of 42 patients reported nausea and one reported diarrhea (92132). In another trial, taking chlorella tablets (Sun Chlorella A, Sun Chlorella Corp) and a chlorella extract (Wakasa Gold, Sun Chlorella Corp) resulted in transient worsening of constipation in 4 of 13 patients and transient mild diarrhea in 2 of 13 patients (92130).
Green discoloration of the feces has also been reported, due to the chlorophyll content of chlorella (6804,95013).

Hematologic ...Orally, chlorella has been linked to one case of thrombocytopenia; however, causality has not been determined. A 49-year-old female living in Turkey presented with thrombocytopenia (a platelet count of 27,000/mm³) after taking chlorella 1080 mg daily for 20 days. Platelet counts had been normal one month earlier, and returned to normal two weeks after discontinuing the chlorella supplement (99879).

Immunologic ...Allergic reactions, including asthma and anaphylaxis, have been reported in people taking chlorella and in those preparing chlorella tablets (3900,5847,41827,105645).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, manganese (Mn)-induced parkinsonism has been reported after long-term consumption of chlorella extract. In this case, a patient on maintenance hemodialysis reported gait disturbance, dysarthria, elevated serum and cerebrospinal fluid manganese levels, and abnormal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of the brain. The authors identified the condition as a rare case of Mn-induced parkinsonism, which may have been due to long-term ingestion of a chlorella extract containing 1.7 mg of Mn in the usual daily dose. The patient underwent edetic acid infusion therapy, which improved the MRI abnormalities and the other symptoms improved four months later (41817).
In one study, fatigue was reported in 18 of 41 patients receiving chlorella 200 mg (10388).

(Read more about CHLORELLA)

General ...Orally, ginger is generally well tolerated. However, higher doses of 5 grams per day increase the risk of side effects and reduce tolerability. Topically, ginger seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal discomfort, burping, diarrhea, heartburn, and a pepper-like irritant effect in the mouth and throat. However, some of these mild symptoms may be reduced by ingesting encapsulated ginger in place of powdered ginger.
Topically: Dermatitis in sensitive individuals.

Cardiovascular ...Orally, use of ginger resulted in mild arrhythmia in one patient in a clinical trial (16306).

Dermatologic ...Orally, ginger can cause hives (17933), as well as bruising and flushing (20316) or rash (20316).
Topically, ginger can cause dermatitis in sensitive individuals (12635,46902).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, common side effects of ginger include nausea (17933,22602,89898,101761), belching (10380,103359), dry mouth (103359), dry retching (10380), vomiting (10380), burning sensation (10380), oral numbness (22602), abdominal discomfort (5343,89898,96253), heartburn (5343,7624,12472,16306,20316,51845,89894,89895,89898,89899)(101760,101761,101762,111543), diarrhea (5343,101760), constipation (89898,101760,101761), or a transient burning or "chilly hot" sensation of the tongue and throat (52076). Orally, Number Ten, a specific product composed of rhubarb, ginger, astragalus, red sage, and turmeric, can increase the incidence of loose stools (20346).
Four cases of small bowel obstruction due to ginger bolus have been reported following the ingestion of raw ginger without sufficient mastication (chewing). In each case, the bolus was removed by enterotomy. Ginger is composed of cellulose and therefore is resistant to digestion. It can absorb water, which may cause it to swell and become lodged in narrow areas of the digestive tract (52115).

Genitourinary ...In one clinical trial, some patients reported increased menstrual bleeding while taking a specific ginger extract (Zintoma, Goldaru) 250 mg four times daily orally for 3 days (17931). An "intense" urge to urinate after 30 minutes was reported in two of eight patients given 0.5-1 gram of ginger (7624). However, this effect has not been corroborated elsewhere. Dysuria, flank pain, perineal pain, and urinary stream interruption have been reported in a 43-year-old male who drank ginger tea, containing 2-3 teaspoons of dry ginger, daily over 15 years. The adverse effects persisted for 4 years and were not associated with increases in urinary frequency or urgency. Upon discontinuing ginger, the patient's symptoms began to improve within one week and completely resolved after eight weeks, with no relapses six months later (107902).

Immunologic ...In one case report, a 59-year-old Japanese female with multiple allergic sensitivities developed pruritus and then anaphylactic shock after taking an oral ginger-containing herbal supplement for motion sickness (Keimei Gashinsan, Keimeido). The patient had used this supplement previously for over 20 years with no allergic reaction. The authors theorized the development of a cross-reactivity to ginger after the use of an oral supplement containing zedoary and turmeric, which are also in the Zingiberaceae family (102463).

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, ginger may cause sedation, drowsiness, or dizziness (16306,17933,51845).

(Read more about GINGER)

General ...Orally, glucomannan is generally well tolerated when taken with plenty of water or other liquid.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, bloating, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, and vomiting.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Choking and esophageal or gastrointestinal obstruction, especially when taken as a dry powder or in tablet form.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, glucomannan can cause gastrointestinal disturbances, including abdominal pain, bloating, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, and vomiting, especially when taken in doses of more than 3 grams daily (57781,57784,92004,92010,92011,97935,106411). Esophageal and gastrointestinal obstructions have been reported when dry glucomannan-containing products are taken with insufficient fluid (11293,57785,106410).

Hepatic ...Acute cholestatic hepatitis occurred in a 31-year-old male after taking glucomannan orally for 45 days (57777). He was also taking other supplements, including garlic and chitosan, so it is unclear whether the hepatitis was due to glucomannan, other supplements, or the combination.

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Cases of occupational respiratory disorders, including respiratory sensitization and bronchial asthma, have been reported in workers exposed to glucomannan (57789,57810).

(Read more about GLUCOMANNAN)

General ...Orally, guar gum is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhea, flatulence, heartburn, gas, and loose stools.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Severe esophageal and small bowel obstruction when taken with an inadequate amount of fluid.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, guar gum may cause gastrointestinal adverse effects such as abdominal cramps, abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhea, flatulence, heartburn, gas, and loose stools (10896,10897,12541,12543,12545,12547,12548,54209,54212,54232)(54260,54314,54333,93617,93619). Gastrointestinal side effects can be minimized by starting with small doses and titrating up. In one clinical study, taste aversion to guar gum leading to withdrawal from the study has been reported (16736).
When guar gum is consumed with inadequate amounts of fluids, it can cause severe esophageal and small bowel obstruction. Tell patients to take guar gum with at least 8 ounces (250 mL) of water (602,54230).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Occupational exposure to guar gum may cause asthma (600,601).

(Read more about GUAR GUM)

General ...Orally, gum arabic seems to be generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal bloating, flatulence, mild diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, gum arabic can cause minor gastrointestinal disturbances such as abdominal bloating, flatulence, nausea, vomiting, cramping, and mild diarrhea (8072,18237,99098,105038,105040,108051). These effects occurred in 15%, 82%, and 90% of subjects respectively in one study (18237). They may subside with continued use within 2 weeks (8072,18237,99098,105038).

Immunologic ...Gum arabic might cause allergic reactions. In one case report, a patient had an immunoglobulin E response after exposure to gum arabic. However, there have been no identified case reports of allergic reactions after oral exposure to gum arabic (19636,105040).

(Read more about GUM ARABIC)

General ...Orally, karaya gum is generally well tolerated (6,4912). Gastrointestinal bezoars have been reported in individuals that do not consume adequate quantities of liquid with karaya gum (98473).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, karaya gum granules have been reported to cause esophageal, duodenal, and colonic bezoars. Bezoars seem to occur when the granules are not consumed with a large volume of liquid. One 66-year-old man developed an esophageal bezoar after consuming several tablespoons of karaya gum granules without liquid. While he was lying down, esophageal secretions caused the karaya gum to swell into a semi-solid mass (98473).

(Read more about KARAYA GUM)

General ...Orally and intravaginally, Lactobacillus acidophilus is generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Mild gastrointestinal adverse effects.
Intravaginally: Vaginal discharge.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: There is concern that L. acidophilus may cause infections in some people.

Dermatologic ...Orally, in one clinical trial, a combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei F19, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lacltis BB-12 was associated with two cases of rash, one with itching. However, it is not clear if these adverse effects were due to L. acidophilus, other ingredients, the combination, or if the events were idiosyncratic (90236).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, taking Lactobacillus acidophilus in combination with other probiotics may cause gastrointestinal side effects including epigastric discomfort (90239), abdominal pain (90239,90291,111785), dyspepsia (90239), flatulence (107497,107520), bloating (107497,111785), diarrhea (111785), vomiting (107537), and burping (90239); however, these events are uncommon.

Genitourinary ...Intravaginally, cream containing Lactobacillus acidophilus has been shown to cause increased vaginal discharge in about 5% of patients, compared to about 1% of patients receiving placebo cream (90237). Vaginal burning was reported by one person using intravaginal L. acidophilus and Limosilactobacillus fermentum in a clinical trial (111781).

Immunologic ...Since Lactobacillus acidophilus preparations contain live and active microorganisms, there is some concern that they might cause pathogenic infection in some patients. L. acidophilus has been isolated in some cases of bacteremia, sepsis, splenic abscess, liver abscess, endocarditis, necrotizing fasciitis, pancreatic necrosis, and meningoencephalitis. Most of these cases are thought to be due to the translocation of bacteria from other locations in the body in which they occur naturally, such as the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract (107543,111782,111792). L. acidophilus endophthalmitis has been reported rarely (111787,111795). In one case, it was related to intravitreal injections for age-related macular degeneration in a 90-year-old female with an intraocular lens (111787). In another, it occurred following cataract surgery (111795).

(Read more about LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS)

General ...Orally, oats are well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal distension, bloating, flatulence, and unpleasant taste.
Topically: Burning, contact dermatitis, itching, and redness.

Dermatologic ...Topically, oat-containing preparations can cause contact dermatitis (12515). Redness, burning, and itchiness have also been reported (103340).

Gastrointestinal ...When consumed orally, oats provide fiber. Increasing fiber in the diet can cause flatulence, bloating, abdominal distention, and unpleasant taste. To minimize side effects, doses should be slowly titrated to the desired level. These adverse effects usually subside with continued use (12514).
In patients who have difficulty chewing food, or those with conditions that decrease small bowel motility, oat bran may cause bezoars (concretions) and intestinal obstruction. Oats and oat bran are unlikely to cause obstruction without other causative factors (4979,4985).

Immunologic ...In a case report, a 45-year-old male developed acute generalized urticaria, facial angioedema, and dyspnea immediately after consuming oat flour. The reaction resolved after emergency care for anaphylaxis. Further investigation revealed an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction to oat proteins (113490).

(Read more about OATS)

General ...Orally, pectin seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Diarrhea, gas, loose stools, and mild cramps.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
All routes of administration: Allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, in sensitive individuals.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, pectin alone or in combination with guar gum and insoluble fiber can cause gastrointestinal adverse effects such as mild cramps, diarrhea, gas, and loose stools (12547,15020,92473).

Immunologic ...Orally and topically, pectin may cause allergic reactions in sensitive individuals. In one case, a 7-year-old boy with a history of oral allergy syndrome after consuming a pectin-containing beverage experienced anaphylaxis after taking a citrus bath containing pectin. Allergy testing confirmed sensitivity to pectin (106928).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...The occupational inhalation of pectin dust can cause asthma (580,581,582,583,584).

(Read more about PECTIN)

General ...Orally, topically, or rectally, peppermint oil is generally well tolerated. Inhaled, peppermint oil seems to be well tolerated. Intranasally, no adverse effects have been reported. However, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted. Orally, peppermint leaf seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Abdominal pain, anal burning, belching, diarrhea, dry mouth, heartburn, nausea, and vomiting.
Topically: Burning, dermatitis, irritation, and redness.

Dermatologic ...Topically, peppermint oil can cause skin irritation, burning, erythema, and contact dermatitis (3802,11781,31528,43338,68473,68457,68509,96361,96362). Also, a case of severe mucosal injury has been reported for a patient who misused an undiluted over the counter mouthwash that contained peppermint and arnica oil in 70% alcohol (19106).
In large amounts, peppermint oil may cause chemical burns when used topically or orally. A case of multiple burns in the oral cavity and pharynx, along with edema of the lips, tongue, uvula, and soft palate, has been reported for a 49-year-old female who ingested 40 drops of pure peppermint oil. Following treatment with intravenous steroids and antibiotics, the patient's symptoms resolved over the course of 2 weeks (68432). Also, a case of chemical burns on the skin and skin necrosis has been reported for a 35-year-old male who spilled undiluted peppermint oil on a previous skin graft (68572). Oral peppermint oil has also been associated with burning mouth syndrome and chronic mouth ulceration in people with contact sensitivity to peppermint (6743). Also, excessive consumption of mint candies containing peppermint oil has been linked to cases of stomatitis (13114).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, peppermint oil can cause heartburn, nausea and vomiting, anal or perianal burning, abdominal pain, belching, dry mouth, diarrhea, and increased appetite (3803,6740,6741,6742,10075,11779,11789,17682,68497,68514)(68532,68544,96344,96360,102602,104219,107955). Enteric-coated capsules might help to reduce the incidence of heartburn (3802,4469,6740,11777). However, in one clinical study, a specific enteric-coated formulation of peppermint oil (Pepogest; Nature's Way) taken as 180 mg three times daily was associated with a higher rate of adverse effects when compared with placebo (48% versus 31%, respectively). Specifically, of the patients consuming this product, 11% experienced belching and 26% experienced heartburn, compared to 2% and 12%, respectively, in the placebo group (107955). A meta-analysis of eight small clinical studies in patients with irritable bowel syndrome shows that taking enteric-coated formulations of peppermint oil increases the risk of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms by 67% when compared with a control group (109980). Enteric-coated capsules can also cause anal burning in people with reduced bowel transit time (11782,11789).

Genitourinary ...Orally, a sensitive urethra has been reported rarely (102602).

Hepatic ...One case of hepatocellular liver injury has been reported following the oral use of peppermint. Symptoms included elevated liver enzymes, fatigue, jaundice, dark urine, and signs of hypersensitivity. Details on the dosage and type of peppermint consumed were unavailable (96358).

Immunologic ...One case of IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, characterized by sudden onset of lip and tongue swelling, tightness of throat, and shortness of breath, has been reported in a 69-year-old male who consumed peppermint candy (89479). An allergic reaction after use of peppermint oil in combination with caraway oil has been reported in a patient with a history of bronchial asthma (96344). It is not clear if this reaction occurred in response to the peppermint or caraway components.

Neurologic/CNS ...Orally, headache has been reported rarely (102602).

Ocular/Otic ...Orally, peppermint has been reported to cause blurry vision (3803).

(Read more about PEPPERMINT)

General ...Orally, red raspberry fruit is well tolerated. There is currently a limited amount of information on the adverse effects of red raspberry leaf.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Diarrhea, gastrointestinal upset, and epigastric pain. However, these adverse effects do not commonly occur with typical doses.

Dermatologic ...A liquid containing red raspberry leaf cell culture extract 0. 0005%, vitamin C 20%, and vitamin E 1% (Antioxidant and Collagen Booster Serum, Max Biocare Pty Ltd.) has been reported to cause mild tingling and skin tightness (102355). It is unclear if these effects are due to red raspberry leaf, the other ingredients, or the combination.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, red raspberry may cause gastrointestinal upset, diarrhea, and epigastric pain (112127).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...A case of occupational asthma due to the inhalation of red raspberry powder has been reported for a 35-year-old female. Symptoms included wheezing and shortness of breath (70370).

(Read more about RED RASPBERRY)

General ...Orally, slippery elm seems to be well tolerated. A thorough evaluation of safety outcomes with topical use of slippery elm has not been conducted.

Dermatologic ...Topically, slippery elm extracts can cause contact dermatitis. The pollen is an allergen (6). Contact dermatitis and urticaria have been reported after exposure to slippery elm or an oleoresin contained in the slippery elm bark (75131).

(Read more about SLIPPERY ELM)