Papaya Complex Natural Peppermint Flavor by Wonder Laboratories

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Allergic rhinitis (hay fever). Although there has been interest in using oral bromelain for allergic rhinitis, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bromelain for this condition.
• Aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia shows that taking a specific combination product (Opera, Gam Farma), providing bromelain 20 mg, alpha-lipoic acid 240 mg, Boswellia serrata 40 mg, and methylsulfonylmethane 200 mg, daily for 6 months reduces arthralgia symptoms when compared to baseline (109570). The validity of these findings is limited by a lack of placebo control group. Further, it is unclear if these findings are due to bromelain, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Burns. Preliminary clinical research shows that topical bromelain is beneficial for burn debridement. However, it is unclear if topical bromelain is beneficial for scar prevention. Details: Preliminary clinical research and chart reviews show that gels formulated with proteolytic enzymes derived from bromelain (Debridase or NexoBrid, MediWound Ltd.) applied under an occlusive dressing for 4 hours help debride burns, including chemical and electrical burns, in children and adults (18275,91113,103297,108149). Further, a meta-analysis of up to 5 lower- to moderate-quality clinical and observational studies in children and adults with deep burns shows that enzymatic debridement with a specific bromelain based proteolytic enzyme gel applied once or twice for a 4 hour period reduces eschar time by approximately 7 days and reduces the relative risk of surgical excision, and autografts by 83%, and 60%, respectively, when compared with standard of care (e.g., surgical and non-surgical procedures) (115870). The validity of these results is limited by significant heterogeneity across clinical studies, including differences in the location of burns and extent of total body surface area affected.
• Cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral bromelain for cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bromelain for this condition.
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in adults with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy shows that taking a specific product (Opera, Gamfarma s.r.l.) containing bromelain 20 mg, alpha-lipoic acid 240 mg, methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) 200 mg, and boswellia 40 mg daily for 12 weeks reduces overall pain when compared with baseline (96449). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a control group. Additionally, it is not clear if benefit is due to alpha-lipoic acid, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Chronic venous insufficiency. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: An observational study in adults with chronic venous insufficiency using compression stockings shows that taking a specific supplement containing bromelain dry extract 50-200 mg, Baikal skullcap, and horse chestnut (Lenidase, Enfarma), dose adjusted based on severity, daily for up to 90 days, improves severity of lower extremity symptoms (e.g., inflammation, pain, varicose veins, vessel induration) when compared with the use of compression stockings alone (115869). It is unclear if these benefits are due to bromelain, the other ingredients, or the combination.
• Diabetes. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small observational study in patients with a family history of type 1 diabetes found that taking a specific product (Mucos Pharma) containing bromelain 90 mg. rutin 100 mg, and trypsin 48 mg daily for 24 months is not associated with reduced incidence of type 1 diabetes at 8 years (99472).
• Diabetic foot ulcers. Although there has been interest in using topical bromelain for diabetic foot ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bromelain for this condition.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. It is unclear if oral bromelain is beneficial for preventing exercise-induced muscle soreness. Details: One small clinical study shows that taking bromelain 300 mg three times daily, immediately following an intense exercise regimen, does not reduce delayed onset muscle soreness and has no effect on pain, flexibility, or skeletal weakness when compared with either ibuprofen 400 mg three times daily or placebo (10622). However, a small clinical study shows that taking a combination protease tablet containing bromelain 50 mg, trypsin 75 mg, papain 50 mg, amylase 10 mg, lipase 10 mg, lysosome 10 mg, and chymotrypsin 2 mg, four times in one day before downhill running, can improve recovery of contractile muscle function and decrease muscle soreness when compared with placebo (67838). It is unclear if these effects are due to bromelain, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Exercise-induced respiratory infections. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Preliminary clinical research in non-elite male runners shows that taking a combination product (Wobenzym Plus, Mucos Pharma) providing bromelain 540-1080 mg, rutin 600-1200 mg, and trypsin 288-576 mg daily for 3 weeks, starting one week before a marathon, does not reduce the risk of a post-race respiratory tract infection when compared with placebo (96766).
• Kidney stones (nephrolithiasis). It is unclear if oral bromelain is beneficial for kidney stone expulsion. Details: Observational research in patients with 4-10 mm kidney stones found that adding bromelain to tamsulosin is associated with a 12% increased rate of spontaneous stone expulsion when compared to tamsulosin alone (100752).
• Knee pain. It is unclear if oral bromelain is beneficial for knee pain. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking bromelain (Bromelin, Lichtwer Pharma Ltd.) orally for 30 days can reduce mild, acute (duration of less than 3 months) knee pain in otherwise healthy patients when compared to baseline. A daily dose of 400 mg seems to be more effective than 200 mg daily for relieving pain, stiffness, and physical function of the knee, with reductions in symptom scores of 59% and 41%, respectively (11457).
• Lymphedema. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Some clinical research in patients who have undergone a mastectomy shows that taking a specific combination product containing bromelain, rutin, pancreatin, papain, trypsin, and chymotrypsin (Wobenzym N, Mucos Pharma) daily for 7 weeks reduces arm swelling associated with lymphedema when compared with diuretics (24560). Other preliminary clinical research in patients with primary or secondary lymphedema of the upper or lower limbs shows that taking a different combination product containing bromelain 100 mg, rutin 300 mg, and sweet clover 100 mg daily for 6 months decreases pitting, limb volume, pain, and quality of life when compared to baseline (103298). The validity of these results is limited by the lack of a control group. Additionally, it is unclear if these findings are due to bromelain, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Multiple sclerosis (MS). Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A preliminary clinical study in patients with relapsing-remitting MS shows that taking an enzyme combination containing bromelain 90 mg, rutin 100 mg, and trypsin 48 mg per tablet for at least 3 months does not affect the progression of disability, relapse rate, or central nervous system lesions when compared with placebo (99468). The validity of these results is limited by the short duration of treatment.
• Ocular floaters. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in patients with spontaneous symptomatic vitreous opacities (ocular floaters) shows that taking oral mixed fruit enzyme capsules containing bromelain 190 mg, papain, and ficin once, twice, or three times daily for 3 months eliminates floaters in 55%, 63%, and 70% of patients, respectively, when compared with an elimination rate of 5% with vitamin C as a control. Additionally, patients with vitreous hemorrhage-induced symptomatic vitreous opacities taking the mixed fruit enzyme capsules 3 times daily for 3 months reduced intraocular blood by 56% and improved visual acuity, but these effects were not found for lower doses and shorter durations when compared with a control (111650). It is unclear if these effects are due to bromelain, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Osteoarthritis. It is unclear if oral bromelain is beneficial for osteoarthritis. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking bromelain 800 mg daily for 12 weeks as an adjunctive treatment for moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis is no more effective than placebo for improving symptom scores (18274). Other preliminary clinical research shows that taking bromelain 500 mg daily for 4 weeks for mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis is less effective than diclofenac 100 mg daily for improving quality of life, joint pain, and joint function (96216). However, preliminary clinical research shows that oral combination products containing bromelain can reduce pain and improve function in knee osteoarthritis (6252,91104,91106,99467,99477,103299). Bromelain 180 mg has been used in combination with trypsin 144 mg and rutin 200 mg (Phlogenzym, Mucos Pharma GMBH; Wobenzym, Mucos Pharma GmbH) three times daily for 3-12 weeks, with effects comparable to diclofenac, usually taken as 50 mg three times daily for one week, then twice daily thereafter. This product also reduces the need for rescue analgesics by 95% when compared with placebo (6252,91104,99467,99477). Other studies have used a specific combination supplement (AINAT, Laboratoire de Rhumatologie Appliquée) containing Devil's claw 600 mg, turmeric 400 mg, and bromelain 300 mg, taken 2-3 times daily for 2-8 weeks (91106) or a combination of bromelain 250 mg and papain 250 mg (Nature's Life Bromelain & Papain, NutraMarks, Inc.) twice daily, plus aceclofenac 100 mg twice daily for 6 weeks (103299).
• Pain (acute). It is unclear if oral bromelain is beneficial for acute pain. Details: A meta-analysis of 9 small clinical studies in patients experiencing acute pain due to various etiologies shows that taking bromelain slightly improves subjective pain scores and allows patients to open their mouth wider after oral operations when compared with a control (113513).
• Parturition. Although there has been interest in using oral bromelain for shortening the duration of labor, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bromelain for this purpose.
• Periodontitis. It is unclear if oral bromelain is beneficial for periodontitis. Details: A very small clinical study in adults with periodontitis shows that taking bromelain 500 mg (Anaheal) twice daily for one week after undergoing pocket elimination surgery reduces bleeding on probing but does not improve gingival index, plaque index, or probing pocket depth when compared with placebo when assessed five weeks after surgery (111691). The validity of these effects is limited by a very small sample size and inadequate statistical power.
• Pityriasis lichenoides chronica (PLC). It is unclear if oral bromelain is beneficial for PLC. Details: A case series suggests that taking bromelain 40 mg orally three times daily for one month, then twice daily for a second month, then once daily for a third month, helps treat episodes of PLC when compared to baseline (18280).
• Postoperative pain. While evidence is mixed, some small clinical studies suggest that oral bromelain reduces postoperative pain after some oral surgeries. Details: Meta-analyses and clinical research in a small number of patients undergoing wisdom tooth extraction shows that bromelain modestly reduces pain for up to 8 days when compared with control (91109,91110,100750,100751). In contrast, several other small clinical studies show that taking bromelain does not reduce pain after wisdom tooth extraction when compared with placebo (91107,96214,96215). These studies might not have been sufficiently powered to detect a smaller effect. Meta-analyses also suggest that bromelain does not appear to have a significant effect on postoperative swelling or trismus (100750,100751). Additionally, multiple clinical studies in patients undergoing oral procedures, including crown lengthening or root canal surgery, shows that bromelain 160-1500 mg, taken in 2-4 divided doses daily for up to 6 days, reduces dental pain, swelling, and trismus similarly to taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (e.g., ketoprofen, diclofenac sodium, aceclofenac, and ibuprofen) (91109,91110,110546,113898,115871). Bromelain, in combination with other ingredients, has also been evaluated for reducing pain after surgery. Several clinical trials in adults undergoing a variety of surgery types, including facial trauma, hernioplasty, oral surgery, and shoulder surgery, show that taking specific combination products (Siben, Brovas, Tenosan) containing bromelain and other ingredients (e.g., freeze-dried pineapple, methylsulfonylmethane, Boswellia serrata) daily for 1 week to 3 months reduces postoperative pain (19322,114687,115304,115868). However, clinical significance is unclear. Additionally, it is unclear if the effect is due to bromelain, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Postoperative swelling. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small preliminary clinical study in patients undergoing surgery of the jaw shows that taking an enzyme combination of bromelain 180 mg, rutin 200 mg, and trypsin 96 mg twice daily for 5 days in addition to standard treatment reduces soft-tissue thickness (indicating the amount of swelling) at most of the nine assessed facial points when compared to control (99476). Additionally, a moderate-sized, open-label, clinical trial in adults undergoing facial trauma surgery shows that taking 700 mg per day of bromelain combined with sweet clover and horse chestnut (Brovas, Agave Group) postoperatively for 15 days reduces facial edema when compared with control (115304). However, clinical significance of this benefit is uncertain. Additionally, it is unclear if this effect is due to sweet clover, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Rhinosinusitis. It is unclear if oral bromelain is beneficial for rhinosinusitis. Details: Several small clinical trials show that short-term and long-term use of bromelain reduces symptoms of acute and chronic sinusitis, especially nasal mucosal inflammation and edema (18276,18277,18278,18279,91105). The trials used bromelain 40 mg orally (usually the product Ananase) four times daily for six days as an adjunct to antibiotics (18276,18278,18279) or 6 bromelain tablets each containing enzymes of 500 International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) units for 12 weeks (91105). Bromelain is usually taken in combination with decongestants, antihistamines, and/or antibiotics. However, the studies have a number of methodological problems, and results are inconsistent. Bromelain has also been evaluated as part of a combination product. A small study in patients over 12 years old with chronic sinusitis shows that taking a combination product containing bromelain 200 mg, Boswellia serrata, black currant, and vitamin D (Flogostop Forte, Humana Italia S.p.A) 1-2 times daily for 15-30 days as an adjunctive therapy to inhaled corticosteroids modulates hyperemia of the mucosa, rhinorrhea, and local inflammation when compared with inhaled corticosteroids alone and baseline (111501). It is unclear if these findings are due to bromelain, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Sprains. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A preliminary clinical study in patients with a sprained ankle shows that taking a specific enzyme combination (Phlogenzym, Mucos Pharma) containing bromelain 90 mg, trypsin 48 mg, and rutin 100 mg, or taking different combinations of the individual enzymes three times daily for 10 days, is no more effective for relieving pain than placebo (99473).
• Tendinopathy. Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Clinical research in patients with Achilles tendon insertional tendinopathy shows that taking two sachets of a specific supplement (Tenosan, Agave, Prato, Italy) containing a total of bromelain 100 mg, arginine-L-alpha-ketoglutarate 1000 mg, methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) 1100 mg, hydrolyzed collagen type I 600 mg, vitamin C 120 mg, and Vinitrox 25 mg orally for 60 days improves function and pain when compared with placebo (19321).
• Urinary tract infections (UTIs). Oral bromelain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical trial shows that a combination of bromelain 50 mg and trypsin 1 mg (Kimotab, Mochida Pharmaceutical), taken in a dose of 8 tablets daily for 2 days, does not improve subjective symptoms of UTIs when compared with placebo (18282).
• Venous leg ulcers. Although there has been interest in using topical bromelain for venous leg ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of bromelain for this condition.
• Wound healing. It is unclear if enzymatic debridement with bromelain improves the healing of various types of chronic wounds. Details: A meta-analysis of 12 small clinical studies shows that topical bromelain reduces time to complete debridement by around 6 days but has no effect on time to healing when compared with a control (113513). However, the validity of these effects is limited by significant publication bias and a small number of studies per outcome. One small clinical study, included in the analysis above, of patients with chronic wounds related to diabetes, surgery, trauma, or venous insufficiency shows that use of bromelain-based enzymatic debridement (EscharEx, MediWound Ltd), administered as up to ten daily applications of 4 hours each, increases the incidence of complete debridement over the next 6 months to 55% of patients, compared with only 29% of those using the bromelain-free gel. However, there was no difference in changes in wound area, non-viable tissue area, or the incidence or time to complete wound closure (108148). More evidence is needed to rate bromelain for these uses.

(Read more about BROMELAIN)

EFFECTIVE

• Dyspepsia. Oral calcium carbonate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an antacid. Details: Taking calcium carbonate orally as an antacid is effective for treating dyspepsia (1843). Calcium carbonate has FDA approval as an antacid.
• Hyperkalemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities. Details: Administering calcium gluconate intravenously can reverse electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias induced by hyperkalemia (12946). Intravenous calcium gluconate is FDA-approved for preventing hyperkalemia-induced cardiac abnormalities.
• Hypocalcemia. Oral calcium treats and prevents hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium is used to treat severe hypocalcemia. Details: Taking calcium orally is effective for treating and preventing hypocalcemia. Intravenous calcium gluconate, acetate, gluceptate, or chloride is effective for severe hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany (12928).
• Kidney failure. Oral calcium carbonate or calcium acetate is used as a phosphate binder during kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium carbonate or calcium acetate orally is effective as a phosphate binder. Calcium acetate (PhosLo) appears to control hyperphosphatemia better than sevelamer (Renagel) (12943,12944,38990). Calcium citrate is not recommended for this purpose because it increases aluminum absorption and does not bind phosphate as efficiently as calcium acetate or calcium carbonate (21631). Some clinical research also shows that taking calcium orally reduces blood pressure in patients with kidney failure (975).

LIKELY EFFECTIVE

• Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Oral calcium in combination with vitamin D prevents bone density loss that occurs during long-term treatment with corticosteroids. Details: Taking calcium in combination with vitamin D as adjunctive therapy seems to be effective for reducing bone mineral density loss in people using corticosteroids long-term (982,1046,1830,1831,1832,4462,4463,4464,4465,4466)(4467,12945,38493). One specific product used in clinical research is Oscal (Marion Merrel Dow Inc.), which contains elemental calcium 500 mg per tablet plus vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (982). Another product used is Oscal 250 + D (SmithKline Beecham Healthcare), which contains elemental calcium 250 mg and vitamin D 125 IU per tablet (1046).
• Hyperparathyroidism. Oral calcium reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure. Details: Taking calcium orally reduces parathyroid hormone levels in patients with kidney failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism (1827,1828,1829,39174,39425). In elderly women, the combination of calcium and vitamin D reverses secondary hyperparathyroidism and reduces hip fracture risk (8818). Also, population research suggests increased calcium intake from the diet and supplements reduces the risk of primary hyperparathyroidism in women. Supplemental intakes of at least 500 mg/day and dietary intakes of approximately 1100 mg/day are considered to be protective (91353).
• Osteoporosis. Adequate calcium intake, from the diet and/or supplements, is recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Details: The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommends ensuring adequate calcium intake in line with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) by age, along with adequate vitamin D intake, for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in adults over 50 years of age. Supplementation can be used to augment dietary intake when adequate dietary intake is not feasible (109425). In the US and Canada, foods containing at least 200 mg calcium with less phosphorous content than calcium can be labelled with a health claim regarding the relationship between adequate calcium intake and a reduced risk for osteoporosis (11940,102148). However, calcium supplementation is not recommended specifically for the primary prevention of osteoporosis. The US Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) states that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of vitamin D and calcium supplementation, alone or in combination, for the primary prevention of fractures in community dwelling adults without osteoporosis (95695). Also, calcium supplements do not seem to be effective for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) during lactation (988), in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation (1817), or in patients who have had renal transplantation (4823,38736,38871). Maximal bone growth occurs in the teenage years, and then BMD in females remains relatively constant until age 30-40. After age 40, bone loss typically occurs at rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. In males, this occurs several decades later. Bone loss is more pronounced if dietary calcium intake is below the RDA, which is the case for many Americans (2571,2578). One meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in healthy children 7-14 years old shows that fortifying food with calcium 250-1000 mg daily for up to 24 months modestly improves femoral neck BMD, but not hip or spine BMD. However, the included trials did not supplement vitamin D (107232). During the 5 years immediately after menopause, calcium supplementation has very little effect on bone loss (2569,2570,2575,2576). The rapid loss of estrogen causes a high bone resorption rate, which increases serum calcium levels and therefore decreases intestinal absorption of calcium (2570). After this period, the typical rate of bone loss is 2% per year (2572,2576). Taking calcium 1000-1600 mg daily as carbonate, citrate, lactate gluconate, or citrate malate salt decreases this rate by 0.25% to 1% annually (977,979,981,2569,2571,2572,2575,2576,2578,6850)(38978,38980,39064). The greatest reductions (1% or more) are seen in the first 1-2 years of supplementation when bone remodeling foci can be filled (2569,2576). After this period, the differences in rate of loss between supplemented and non-supplemented females are closer to 0.25% per year (2569,2577). A meta-analysis of clinical evidence suggests that there is no additional benefit after 4 years (38980). Small clinical studies have found that continuous calcium supplementation at an average daily dose of 1050 mg, started after menopause and continued for 1.5-4 years, may reduce fracture rates by 26% when compared with no calcium supplementation. The largest of these studies was conducted in nursing home residents who also received daily vitamin D; the benefits of calcium, specifically, are unclear (39386). Some research also suggests that calcium and vitamin D improves primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in some older individuals with osteoporosis, particularly the elderly and those who are no longer community dwelling (12930,38875,38849,39026,109471). However, not all research is positive. One large clinical trial in elderly adults with a low-trauma fracture show that taking calcium 1000 mg daily with or without vitamin D 800 IU daily for 2-7 years does not reduce the risk of a second fracture when compared with placebo (13073). Another clinical study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 800 IU daily does not prevent a second fracture in elderly patients, or prevent a first fracture in elderly patients with other risk factors such as low body weight (less than 58 kg, 127.6 pounds), smoking, family history of hip fracture, or fair or poor self-reported health (12929). Also, some exploratory research suggests that supplements may need to be continued indefinitely; in adults over 68 years of age, any effects of 2 years of calcium supplements on BMD appear to be lost within 2 years after discontinuing supplements (6853). Calcium has additive effects when used with other agents such as vitamin D, estrogens, or calcitonin. Whereas calcium alone generally reduces or prevents loss of BMD, combination with other agents can produce small increases in BMD ranging from 0.3% to 3.3% depending on the combination and dosages used (978,980,1836,2570,2571,2572,2576). However, one meta-analysis in healthy adults shows that fortifying foods with calcium 250-1000 mg daily, in conjunction with vitamin D supplementation, for up to 24 months does not improve BMD when compared with control (107232). The full potential of osteoporosis treatments cannot be realized without adequate calcium intake (2569,2570,2571,2572). Advise patients taking agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or raloxifene (Evista) to ensure that their daily calcium intake meets the RDA. Use supplements if necessary. The usefulness of calcium in preventing osteoporosis in males is not as well-studied. Some observational research has found that calcium 870 mg daily is not associated with changes in BMD and bone loss in males (97201). However, clinical evidence suggests that taking calcium 1000 mg daily for 2 years might improve trabecular or cortical bone mass by 2% to 4% (980,8827,8873). Dietary supplementation with calcium and vitamin D seems to moderately reduce bone loss measured in the femoral neck, spine, and total body, and seems to reduce the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in older patients with osteopenia or low BMD (980).
• Premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Adequate calcium intake seems to prevent symptoms of PMS. Details: There seems to be a link between low dietary calcium intake and symptoms of PMS (2004,6847,39007). Taking calcium 1000-1336 mg daily seems to significantly reduce depressed mood, water retention, and pain, especially if daily calcium intake is inadequate (1822,1823,1824,2004,95821). Calcium carbonate 1200 mg daily seems to decrease PMS symptom scores by about 18% when compared with placebo (1822). Increasing dietary calcium intake is also associated with a decreased risk of developing PMS. Consuming an average of 1283 mg of calcium per day from foods is associated with about a 30% lower risk of developing PMS compared with consuming an average of 529 mg daily (13094); however, taking calcium supplements does not appear to be associated with the risk of developing PMS.

POSSIBLY EFFECTIVE

• Colorectal cancer. Oral calcium seems to be beneficial for preventing colorectal cancer, especially in those with adequate vitamin D levels and normal body mass index (BMI). Details: Population studies have found that increased intake of dietary or supplemental calcium is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas (1047,8820,12120,38951,98898,98899). Clinical trials and meta-analyses of clinical research also show that taking calcium supplements 1.2-2 grams daily for up to 4 years can reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence by up to 29% (970,12118,12950,15267,34596,38718,39042,95817). However, not all research has been positive. Some meta-analyses of clinical research or observational studies suggest that taking calcium does not reduce the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer (34596,39042,39349). Other contradictory research suggests that postmenopausal females who take calcium 1000 mg daily plus vitamin D 400 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (14290); however, this finding may not be reliable due to the high baseline intake of calcium in study participants. The reason for these conflicting findings is not entirely clear. Vitamin D might be an important factor. People with lower than average vitamin D levels do not seem to get any benefit from calcium supplements (12118). Also, one meta-analysis of previous trials suggests that taking calcium 1200 mg daily reduces the risk of colorectal adenomas in people with a normal BMI, but not in those who are overweight or obese (99715). Despite this conflicting evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim in 2005 stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas. However, the FDA has determined that there is little scientific evidence to support this claim (102366).
• Fetal bone mineralization. If calcium intakes are low during pregnancy, oral calcium seems to be beneficial for increasing fetal bone density. Details: With low dietary calcium intake (less than 562 mg elemental calcium daily) during pregnancy, calcium supplementation increases fetal bone mineralization and density. However, calcium supplementation does not offer any additional benefit if calcium intakes are adequate (3263,3264).
• Hypertension. Oral calcium seems to reduce blood pressure by a small amount in adults with or without hypertension. However, it is unclear if this reduction is clinically significant. Details: Many clinical trials and observational studies, including a meta-analysis of 18 high-quality clinical trials, show that intake of calcium supplements or dietary calcium modestly reduces systolic blood pressure in patients with or without hypertension, usually around 1-2 mmHg. Calcium seems to be more effective for certain subpopulations of patients, such as those who are salt-sensitive or have low baseline dietary calcium intake (945,972,974,976,984,1818,1819,1820,1821,6852)(13138,14406,38803,39063,39094,39221,113920,113925). However, a large-scale clinical trial in postmenopausal females shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily in combination with elemental calcium 1000 mg daily does not lower blood pressure or reduce the risk of developing hypertension (16714). Additionally, a meta-analysis of 8 clinical trials shows that taking calcium in combination with vitamin D for up to 7 years has no effect on blood pressure (98861). The validity of this finding is limited by the poor methodological quality of the included studies. Some observational research suggests that calcium can reduce the risk for hypertension. Population research in females aged 45 years and older suggests that higher intake of calcium from both diet and supplemental sources is linked to a lower risk of developing hypertension when compared to lower calcium intake (14265). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim stating that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of hypertension. However, the FDA has concluded that this claim is based on supporting, rather than conclusive, evidence (102367). Research evaluating the effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on the child's blood pressure has yielded conflicting findings. A systematic review of 2 clinical studies and 3 observational studies found that calcium intake during pregnancy is associated with a 1-2 mmHg reduction in the systolic blood pressure of the offspring between the ages of 1-7 years (38852). However, a separate meta-analysis of 3 clinical studies shows that calcium intake during pregnancy does not reduce systolic or diastolic blood pressure in the offspring (113923).
• Osteomalacia. Oral calcium seems to reverse osteomalacia caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Osteomalacia is commonly caused by vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to osteomalacia in children and adults. Calcium supplementation can reverse osteomalacia caused by calcium deficiency. Along with appropriate vitamin D supplementation, individuals at risk of osteomalacia need sufficient calcium intake (94819).
• Pre-eclampsia. Oral calcium seems to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia, especially in high-risk individuals and those with low baseline dietary calcium intake. Details: Although there is some conflicting evidence (971,38756), most clinical research shows that taking calcium orally 1-2 grams daily reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia (973,1833,8828,39043,39319,39426,97348,113919). A large clinical trial of 11,000 pregnant individuals in India and Tanzania shows that supplementation with 500 mg daily is similarly effective to 1500 mg daily (113908). Multiple meta-analyses which include 16-30 clinical studies have found that varying doses of calcium supplementation reduce the relative risk of pre-eclampsia by 46% to 51% when compared with placebo (97348,113909,113919). One of these meta-analyses found that for every 19 females treated with calcium, one episode of pre-eclampsia would be avoided (97348). Additionally, one of these meta-analyses found that calcium reduces the relative risk of pre-eclampsia by 51%, regardless of whether it is taken at a dose above or below 1000 mg daily (113919). Some research suggests that calcium supplementation may have a greater effect in individuals at high risk of pre-eclampsia or with low baseline dietary calcium intake, and when taken at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation (15029,38497,97348,99714,113919). However, another meta-analysis of 30 clinical studies found a similar benefit of calcium in both high- and low-risk individuals (113919). A separate meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies conducted in China evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy. This combination was associated with an 80% lower relative risk of pre-eclampsia and an 83% lower relative risk of pre-eclampsia with gestational hypertension when compared with routine care (113913). In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a qualified health claim regarding the use of calcium supplements to reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia. However, due to the limited and conflicting research available at that time, the FDA stated that this outcome was highly unlikely (102366). Since then, large, high-quality clinical research has supported this finding. In fact, in 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) released a recommendation to prescribe oral calcium 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancies at high risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary calcium intakes are low (97347).
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension. Oral calcium may reduce the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Details: A meta-analysis of 17 clinical studies shows that calcium supplementation during pregnancy may reduce the relative risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension by 30% when compared with control (113909). A separate meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies conducted in China, which evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy, shows that this combination reduces the relative risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension by 85% when compared with routine care (113913).
• Rickets. Oral calcium seems to reverse rickets caused by very low calcium intakes. Details: Rickets is commonly caused be vitamin D deficiency; however, very low calcium intake can also lead to rickets. Calcium supplementation can reverse rickets caused by calcium deficiency (94819). A small clinical study in children with nutritional rickets shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily for 24 weeks improves radiographically measured rickets caused by calcium deficiency. Rickets seems to improve more rapidly with calcium 1000 mg compared to calcium 500 mg. However, increasing the calcium dose to 2000 mg daily is not more beneficial than calcium 1000 mg daily (98904).
• Tooth retention. Oral calcium with vitamin D seems to help with tooth retention in the elderly population. Details: A clinical trial in the elderly population shows that taking calcium citrate malate 500 mg daily along with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 700 IU daily orally for 3 years reduces the risk of tooth loss by about 52% when compared with placebo (8816).

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Breast cancer. Oral calcium, via supplementation or as part of the diet, does not seem to be beneficial for breast cancer prevention. Details: Although some studies disagree (15631,39041,95811,107237,113917), most population research suggests that increased calcium intake is not associated with overall breast cancer risk (15631,16715,98895,107236,107237,113917). However, one meta-analysis of observational studies shows that although higher total calcium intake is not associated with breast cancer risk, higher dietary calcium intake, specifically, may be associated with a slightly reduced risk (113917). Also, some analyses suggest that calcium intake may be associated with the risk for certain breast cancer sub-types. Some subgroup analyses suggest that calcium intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, adults (15631,107237) and that dietary calcium intake may reduce estrogen receptor(ER)-negative breast cancer, but not ER-positive breast cancer (107236). However, most research has not evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation or intake on breast cancer subtypes. The best evidence to date, from a large scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), shows that taking vitamin D (cholecalciferol) 400 IU daily plus calcium 1000 mg daily for 7 years after menopause does not reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer at the end of the study and 5 years after the end of the intervention (16715,98895).
• Fractures. Although oral calcium prevents fractures in osteoporosis, most evidence shows that calcium does NOT prevent factures in people who do not have osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis discussion for more information on the use of calcium for this purpose. Details: Robust meta-analyses of mostly large, high-quality clinical studies show that calcium supplementation 500-1600 mg daily for 0.5-7 years with or without vitamin D does not reduce total fractures, hip fractures, vertebral fractures, or non-vertebral fractures in older adults without osteoporosis (95822,112486). A large-scale study in postmenopausal females aged 50-79 years who were enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) suggests that calcium 1000 mg plus vitamin D 400 IU daily for 7 years only modestly improves bone mineral density (BMD) and does not significantly reduce fracture risk. This lack of effect may have been due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. In those who were 80% adherent, the combination of calcium plus vitamin D reduced the risk of hip fracture by about 29% (14282). Also, some clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU for 5 years does not attenuate loss of height after menopause when compared with placebo (95810). Additional meta-analyses of clinical and observational evidence suggest that calcium supplementation is not associated with a reduced risk of vertebral or nonvertebral fractures, such as hip fractures (38589,38888,98895). Some other research has suggested that calcium in combination with vitamin D reduces fracture risk in older patients without osteoporosis (980,1836,8818,12930,12933,12952,38849,102145,107235); however, this research is confounded by a number of variables, including the presence of hormonal therapy and differing levels of fracture risk at baseline (1836,8818,95822). Conflicting findings on this topic might also be due to genetic differences in patient populations. A population analysis of the WHI study found that, in older females with the lowest genetic susceptibility to low BMD, taking calcium with vitamin D is associated with a reduction in fracture risk. However, in females with a higher genetic susceptibility to low BMD, there is no association between supplementation and fracture risk. This might be because individuals with a lower susceptibility to low BMD are also more responsive to calcium and vitamin D supplementation (97357). As of April 2018, the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementing with vitamin D >400 IU daily along with calcium >1000 mg daily is safe and effective for preventing fractures in community dwelling adults without vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or a history of fracture. USPSTF recommends against supplementing with calcium 1000 mg daily or less along with vitamin D 400 IU daily or less for preventing primary fractures in community-dwelling postmenopausal females (95695).
• Obesity. Oral calcium does not seem to improve weight loss in adults or children with overweight or obesity. Details: Observational research has found that adults and children with low calcium intake are more likely to gain weight, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and be overweight or obese when compared to people with high calcium intake (12124,12125,12126,12127,14265). Additional observational research has found that increasing calcium intake is associated with weight loss in females; the results in males have been conflicting (12127,15602,15603). Despite these findings from observational research and a few small clinical studies (12128,15397,14438,98905,113918), most clinical research has found that increased calcium intake does not increase weight loss (12052,13138,15396,15399,38985,39004,97356). A meta-analysis of 20 clinical studies shows that daily dietary and supplemental calcium intake that meets the dietary reference intake (DRI) of 1000 mg or more daily does not increase weight loss in overweight individuals or patients with obesity when compared with intake below the DRI (95813). An older meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials also shows that increased dietary and supplemental calcium intake does not increase weight loss (15605).
• Overall mortality. Oral calcium does not seem to reduce overall mortality. Details: While some population research has found that calcium taken in combination with vitamin D in older females is associated with a lower risk of death (97353), most evidence shows that calcium, with or without vitamin D, has no effect on all-cause mortality (93533,97308,113584).

INEFFECTIVE

• Cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oral calcium does not reduce the risk of developing CVD and may actually increase risk in some patients. Details: Clinical research shows that calcium does not decrease CVD risk. Several separate meta-analyses of clinical and population research involving over 50,000 patients show that taking calcium 600-1200 mg daily for up to 7 years does not reduce the risk of CVD-related outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or overall mortality (39018,91350,92994,93533,97308,98902,107231,107233). No association was found between total dietary or supplemental calcium intake with or without vitamin D and the risk of CVD or mortality (91350,93533,97308). In fact, some population and clinical research has found that when calcium is used alone or with vitamin D, there is an INCREASED risk of CVD and coronary heart disease (38077,107233). However, other clinical research disagrees (93533). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease by 1.1-1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Intravenous calcium does not prevent nerve pain in patients given oxaliplatin. Oral calcium has not been evaluated for this purpose. Details: While pooled analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials suggest that calcium and magnesium infusion decreases the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity, a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials shows that the infusion has no effect in preventing neurotoxicity (90028,90029,90031). Additionally, clinical trials show that administering calcium gluconate 1 gram with magnesium sulfate 1 gram intravenously immediately before, or before and after, the administration of a single oxaliplatin cycle (90005), or over the entire 6-cycle course of oxaliplatin, does not improve symptoms of neurotoxicity when compared with placebo (96474).
• Myocardial infarction (MI). Oral calcium does not prevent MI. When taken in the absence of vitamin D, oral calcium may increase the risk of MI. Details: Population research has found that increased dietary intake of calcium is associated with a decreased risk of MI (91350). However, a 2010 meta-analysis of clinical research shows that taking calcium at a dose of at least 500 mg daily is associated with an approximate 30% INCREASE in the risk of MI in patients over the age of 40. According to this analysis, one additional case of MI will occur for every 69 patients that take calcium for 5 years (17482). A more recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years increases the risk of MI by 1.2 times when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research studied postmenopausal females and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233) In contrast, other meta-analyses of clinical research have shown that taking calcium for up to 7 years is NOT associated with an increased risk of MI, including a meta-analysis that only included postmenopausal females (93533,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI in postmenopausal females (93533). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Alcohol use disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for alcohol use disorder. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 800 mg and vitamin D 200 IU orally daily for 14 days modestly reduces alcohol craving scores and withdrawal scores when compared with placebo in adults with alcohol dependence that are undergoing withdrawal. Taking calcium carbonate did not reduce the need for diazepam; however, the study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups (107234).
• Atherosclerosis. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for atherosclerosis. Details: A population study has found that taking calcium 1.2 grams daily for 3 years has no effect on carotid intima thickness or carotid atherosclerosis incidence. A total calcium intake (dietary and supplemental) of at least 1794 mg daily in older females may be associated with a decreased risk of carotid atherosclerosis when compared with a total calcium intake below 1010 mg daily (97351).
• Autism spectrum disorder. It is unclear if oral calcium during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the odds of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring. Details: A small observational study found that calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a 52% reduced odds of an autism spectrum disorder in the offspring (98900).
• Brain tumor. It is unclear if dietary calcium intake is associated with risk of brain tumor. Details: A meta-analysis of 4 case-control studies has found that higher dietary calcium intake is associated with a lower odds of brain tumor when compared with lower dietary intake (113922). The validity of this finding is limited by the exploratory nature of the included studies, which analyzed all dietary ingredients for any potential associations.
• Cancer. Oral calcium alone does not seem to prevent cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing cancer. Details: Taking calcium alone does not seem to significantly reduce the risk of cancer (12118,15629). The role of calcium in cancer prevention when taken along with vitamin D is controversial, as conflicting results exist. One clinical trial shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1400-1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1100 IU daily have a 60% lower relative risk for developing cancer of any type. Approximately 25 postmenopausal females would need to take this combination for 4 years to prevent one occurrence of cancer (15629). However, a more recent clinical study shows that healthy postmenopausal females who take supplemental calcium 1500 mg daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU daily do not have a reduced risk of cancer at 4 years (93943). Reasons for the disparate results are not entirely clear. The discrepancies do not appear to be related to baseline vitamin D levels or different study populations. It is possible that, given the 10-year time lapse between the two publications, the discrepancies result from differences in cancer detection capability. Also, since cancer risk was a secondary outcome measure in the earlier study and a primary outcome measure in the more recent study, it is possible that the discrepancies result from differences in statistical methodologies. The effect of vitamin D and calcium on cancer risk in males and younger patients is not known. There is also interest in using calcium for reducing the risk of hematological malignancies. An analysis of the Women's Health Initiative study shows that taking calcium 1000 mg daily in combination with vitamin D3 400 IU for up to 10 years is associated with a 20% reduction in the risk of hematologic malignancies when compared with placebo. However, no effect on hematologic malignancy related mortality was seen (97354).
• Depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for depression prevention. Details: Population research has found no association between a higher dietary intake of calcium and the risk of depression when compared with a lower dietary intake of calcium (96480).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if dietary calcium intake is associated with type 2 diabetes risk. Details: Some population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from the diet or supplements, alone or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713,96473,113929). One meta-analysis of cohort and cross-sectional studies found that the highest level of dietary calcium intake is associated with an 18% relative reduction in risk of type 2 diabetes when compared with the lowest level of intake. A dose-response analysis suggests that each 300, 600, and 1000 mg per day increase in dietary calcium intake is associated with a 7%, 14%, and 23% reduced risk of type 2 diabetes, respectively (113929). However, population research is often limited by confounding variables. For example, one analysis suggests that any beneficial effect might be influenced by concomitant magnesium intake (96473,113929), while another suggests that any benefit from increased intake may be more pronounced in females, adults aged 50 years or older, and Asian populations (113929). Furthermore, other population research has found that serum calcium levels higher than 9.6 mg/dL are associated with greater risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults with osteoporosis (95815).
• Dyslipidemia. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for dyslipidemia. Details: One clinical study in adults with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia shows that adding calcium carbonate 400 mg three times daily to a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) for 6 weeks reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4% and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by 4% when compared with the low-fat diet and placebo (2557). In contrast, a clinical study in females with dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 800 mg daily for 2 years INCREASES total cholesterol levels and carotid intima-media thickness in postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, females when compared with placebo (97350). Calcium supplementation has also been evaluated in combination with vitamin D. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including adults with normolipidemia and dyslipidemia shows that taking calcium 500-2000 mg daily and vitamin D 200-7142 IU daily modestly improves HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but not LDL cholesterol levels, when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses suggest that calcium and vitamin D supplementation is most beneficial in patients with dyslipidemia at baseline (107227). The relationship between dietary calcium intake and serum lipid levels has also been evaluated in observational research. A meta-analysis of 7-11 observational studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with total cholesterol levels, although small differences in individual lipid parameters were identified. Additionally, a meta-analysis of 4-9 observational studies suggests that calcium intake is not associated with the risk of developing hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, or low HDL. A subgroup analysis found that higher calcium intake may be associated with lower triglyceride levels in Asian populations (113927). Overall, these findings are limited by significant heterogeneity and the cross-sectional nature of the included studies.
• Dysmenorrhea. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing pain associated with dysmenorrhea. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium carbonate 1000 mg with vitamin D 5000 IU daily for three menstrual cycles does not reduce pain when compared with placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (95821). However, calcium carbonate 1000 mg taken alone seems to reduce pain when compared with placebo.
• Endometrial cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for endometrial cancer prevention. Details: A meta-analysis of population research suggests that calcium supplements may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but dietary calcium does not seem to have any effect (38893).
• Exercise-induced muscle damage. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing exercise-induced muscle damage. Details: A very small clinical study in resistance-trained adults shows that taking calcium carbonate 500 mg 4 times daily for 3 weeks does not attenuate exercise-induced muscle damage from bench presses when compared with placebo (113933). This study may have been inadequately powered to detect a difference between groups.
• Fall prevention. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing falls. Details: Research suggests that calcium in combination with vitamin D, but not calcium alone, might prevent falls by decreasing body sway and normalizing systolic blood pressure (6362,11939,39038). Some experts think the combination of calcium and vitamin D may be important (11916). Preliminary clinical research in adults residing in a health care facility shows that taking vitamin D supplements while increasing dietary calcium and protein for 2 years reduces falls by 11% when compared with standard diets. Intervention diets were supplemented with milk, yogurt, and cheese to provide calcium 1142 mg and protein 69 grams daily (107235). There might also be different effects in females compared to males. In one study, females aged 65 years or older who took vitamin D 700 IU plus calcium citrate 500 mg daily over a 3-year period had a 46% lower risk of falling. However, this combination did not decrease falls in males (14291).
• Fluorosis. Oral calcium has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Taking calcium orally, in combination with ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and vitamin D, seems to be effective for reducing excessive fluoride levels in children and improving symptoms of fluorosis in children aged 6-12 years (990).
• Heart failure. It is unclear if oral calcium in combination with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing heart failure. Details: Based on a secondary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial (Women's Health Initiative), taking calcium 1000 mg with vitamin D 400 IU daily does not reduce the risk of heart failure in the overall population or in individuals at high risk. However, in a subgroup of postmenopausal females without risk factors for heart failure, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might reduce the risk of developing heart failure by about 37% (97307).
• Lead toxicity. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing blood levels of lead. Details: Lead is mobilized along with calcium from bone during pregnancy and lactation, resulting in increased serum concentrations of lead. One clinical study suggests that calcium supplementation does not significantly decrease these elevated lead concentrations (1586). However, another clinical study suggests that taking calcium reduces blood lead levels by 11% when compared with placebo, with greatest effects observed in those with high baseline levels of lead (38957).
• Lyme disease. Although there is interest in using oral calcium for Lyme disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of calcium for this condition.
• Metabolic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium alone or with vitamin D is beneficial for metabolic syndrome prevention. Details: Population research has found that a higher intake of calcium from diet and supplements alone, or in combination with vitamin D, is associated with a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with lower calcium intake (14265,16713).
• Nephrotic syndrome. It is unclear if oral calcium with vitamin D is beneficial for preventing nephrotic syndrome. Details: Clinical research shows that taking calcium 500-1000 mg daily for 3 months in combination with vitamin D3 60,000 IU daily or weekly for 4 weeks has no effect on bone mineral density or the risk of relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (97355).
• Nonmelanoma skin cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing keratinocyte carcinomas. Details: In middle aged and older adults recently diagnosed with a colorectal adenoma, clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily as calcium carbonate for 3-5 years does not reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancer when compared with placebo over a median of 8 years. A sub-group analysis shows that taking calcium alone or with vitamin D3 1000 IU daily reduced the risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by a moderate amount, but had no effect on the risk of basal cell carcinoma (104622).
• Oral mucositis. When used in combination with fluoride treatments, a calcium phosphate mouth rinse seems to prevent and reduce mucositis-related pain in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Details: A small clinical study in patients undergoing HSCT shows that using a particular mouth rinse (Caphosol, EUSA Pharma) containing calcium phosphate, in combination with fluoride treatments, reduces days of mucositis, the duration of pain, and the dose and days of morphine used when compared with placebo and fluoride treatment (38611).
• Ovarian cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for ovarian cancer prevention. Details: An older meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies found that dietary calcium intake is not associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (38792). However, a more recent pooled analysis of 15 cohort and case-control studies has found that the highest intake of dietary or dairy calcium is associated with a 20% lower risk of ovarian cancer when compared to the lowest intake (97349).
• Postpartum depression. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for reducing postpartum depression risk. Details: Preliminary clinical research shows that taking calcium 2 grams daily beginning at 11-21 weeks gestation reduces depression at 12 weeks postpartum when compared with placebo. However, no benefit is seen at 6 weeks postpartum (39447).
• Pregnancy-related leg cramps. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for preventing leg cramps during pregnancy. Details: A small clinical study shows that taking calcium 1 gram twice daily (as a mixture of salts) for 2 weeks can reduce pregnancy-related leg cramps during the second half of pregnancy when compared with no treatment (2567).
• Prematurity. It is unclear if supplemental calcium is beneficial for the growth and development of preterm infants. Details: A small clinical study in preterm infants consuming human milk shows that supplementation with calcium 45 mg/kg daily and phosphorus 25 mg/kg daily does not affect infant weight, length, head circumference, or risk of osteopenia after 6 weeks when compared with human milk alone (113924). However, the duration and size of this study may have been too limited to detect any difference between groups.
• Preterm labor. It is unclear if oral calcium reduces the risk of preterm labor. Details: A meta-analysis of 10 clinical studies shows that taking calcium supplements during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of preterm labor when compared with placebo (113909). A separate meta-analysis of 7 clinical studies conducted in China, which evaluated the benefits of calcium carbonate 500-600 mg daily taken in conjunction with aspirin 50-75 mg daily during pregnancy, shows that this combination reduces the relative risk of preterm labor by 74% when compared with routine care (113913).
• Prostate cancer. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. Details: Some clinical research shows that taking calcium 1200 mg daily might decrease the risk of developing prostate cancer (14133). However, some epidemiological research suggests that consuming very high doses of calcium, over 2000 mg daily, might actually increase the risk of developing prostate cancer (14134). Some epidemiological research also suggests that doses greater than 1500 mg daily increase the risk of poorly differentiated, clinically advanced, and fatal prostate cancer (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer (98894). However, contradictory research suggests that there is no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall risk of prostate cancer (14131,14132,104630).
• Stroke. It is unclear if oral calcium is beneficial for stroke prevention. Details: Some population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke (4822,38678). However, other population research has found that increasing dietary calcium intake is not associated with a decreased risk of stroke (91350). One meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials shows that taking calcium for 2-7 years does not affect the risk of stroke when compared with control. However, the majority of the included research evaluated postmenopausal females, and it is unclear if this finding is applicable to other populations (107233).
• Vertigo. Oral calcium with vitamin D might reduce positional vertigo; the effect of calcium when used alone is unclear. Details: A large clinical study in adults with recurrent benign paroxysmal positional vertigo shows that taking calcium 500 mg and vitamin D 400 IU twice daily for one year reduces annual recurrence of vertigo by 27% when compared with no treatment. The number needed to treat to prevent vertigo was 3.7 (103681). It is unclear if this benefit is due to vitamin D, calcium, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate calcium for these uses.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

POSSIBLY INEFFECTIVE

• Urinary odor. Oral chlorophyllin does not seem to reduce urinary odor. Details: One small clinical study in older adults with an indwelling catheter due to urinary incontinence shows that taking chlorophyllin 100 mg daily for two weeks does not reduce urinary odor when compared with placebo (1323).

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Acne. It is unclear if topical chlorophyllin is beneficial in patients with acne. Details: One small clinical study in adults with mild-moderate acne and large visible pores shows that applying a gel containing chlorophyllin 0.1% liposomal dispersion to the face twice daily for 3 weeks improves the appearance of acne and large pores when compared to baseline (101240). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Body odor. Although there is interest in using oral chlorophyllin for body odor, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of chlorophyllin for this purpose.
• Cancer. Although there is interest in using oral chlorophyllin for cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of chlorophyllin for this condition.
• Constipation. Although there is interest in using oral chlorophyllin for constipation, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of chlorophyllin for this purpose.
• Fecal odor. Although there is interest in using oral chlorophyllin for fecal odor, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of chlorophyllin for this purpose.
• Flatulence. Although there is interest in using oral chlorophyllin for flatulence, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of chlorophyllin for this purpose.
• Leukopenia. It is unclear if oral chlorophyllin reduces the severity of leukopenia. Details: Preliminary clinical research in Chinese adults with leukopenia from various causes shows that taking a specific chlorophyllin product (Yebaike) 40 mg three times daily for 30 days reduces the severity of leukopenia in 85% of patients, compared with 27% of patients taking placebo. However, the treatment group was four times larger than the placebo group, limiting the reliability of these findings (101244).
• Wound healing. Although there is interest in using topical chlorophyllin for wound healing, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of chlorophyllin for this purpose.
• Wrinkled skin. It is unclear if topical chlorophyllin reduces fine lines and wrinkles. Details: One small clinical study in adults with mild-moderate fine lines and wrinkles shows that applying a gel containing chlorophyllin 0.066% liposomal dispersion to the face twice daily for 8 weeks improves the subjective appearance of wrinkles when compared to baseline (101241). The validity of these findings is limited by the lack of a comparator group. More evidence is needed to rate chlorophyllin for these uses.

(Read more about CHLOROPHYLLIN)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Celiac disease. Although there has been interest in using oral lipase for celiac disease, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lipase for this purpose.
• Dyspepsia. It is unclear if oral lipase is beneficial for improving symptoms of postprandial distress syndrome. Details: A small clinical trial shows that taking a specific acid-resistant lipase (Amano Enzyme USA) 280 mg immediately before a high-fat meal does not reduce postprandial bloating and nausea when compared with placebo in individuals with postprandial distress syndrome (101900).
• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although there has been interest in using oral lipase for IBD, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of lipase for this purpose.
• Prematurity. It is unclear if adding a specific form of lipase, recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase (rhBSSL), to infant formula improves outcomes in premature infants. Some research suggests a potential increased risk for adverse effects. Details: Human breast milk contains rhBSSL, but it is inactivated when breast milk is pasteurized for donation. Clinical research in infants born before 32 weeks' gestation shows that adding rhBSSL as 8700 units per 100 mL formula or pasteurized breast milk, for 4 weeks does not increase growth velocity, body length, or head circumference over the next 12 months when compared with formula or pasteurized breast milk devoid of lipase. However, the infants who were small for gestational age (SGA), which made up approximately 15% of the study population, grew by an additional 1.9 grams/kg daily on average when compared with placebo (101940). More evidence is needed to rate lipase for these uses.

(Read more about LIPASE)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Cancer. Although there has been interest in using oral papain for cancer, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of papain for this purpose.
• Dental caries. It is unclear if topical papain gel is beneficial for reducing procedure time or pain in children having caries removed by a dentist. Details: A small clinical study in children 3-9 years of age with dental caries shows that application of a specific papain gel (Brix3000, Brix Medical Science) 3000 U/mg during atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) by a dentist actually increases the time required to remove caries tissue, with no effect on pain, when compared with ART alone (107434).
• Diabetic foot ulcers. Although there has been interest in using topical papain for diabetic foot ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of papain for this purpose.
• Exercise-induced muscle soreness. Oral papain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in healthy males shows that taking a combination enzyme tablet containing papain 50 mg, trypsin 75 mg, bromelain 50 mg, amylase 10 mg, lipase 10 mg, lysosome 10 mg, and chymotrypsin 2 mg, four times in one day before downhill running, improves recovery of contractile muscle function and decreases muscle soreness when compared with placebo (67838). It is unclear if these findings are due to papain, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Herpes zoster (shingles). Although there has been interest in using oral papain for shingles, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of papain for this purpose.
• Insect bite. It is unclear if topical papain is beneficial in individuals with fire ant stings. Details: A small clinical study in individuals with fire ant stings shows that applying gauze soaked with a specific papain-containing meat tenderizer (Adolph's meat tenderizer) to the sting for 20 minutes does not reduce pain or itching when compared with placebo (67845).
• Intestinal parasite infection. Although there has been interest in using oral papain for intestinal parasite infections, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of papain for this purpose.
• Jellyfish stings. It is unclear if topical papain is beneficial in individuals with jellyfish stings. Details: A small clinical study in individuals with jellyfish stings shows that submerging affected skin into a solution with a papain-containing meat tenderizer (Adolph's meat tenderizer), starting two minutes after a jellyfish sting and continuing for at least 20 minutes, is less effective than hot water alone in decreasing pain caused by the jellyfish sting (67835).
• Ocular floaters. Oral papain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A moderate-sized clinical study in patients with symptomatic ocular floaters shows that taking 1, 2, or 3 capsules daily of an oral mixed fruit enzyme product containing papain 95 mg, ficin 95 mg, and bromelain 190 mg for 3 months leads to 55%, 63%, and 70% of floaters completely disappearing, respectively, when compared to baseline, as well as significant improvements when compared with vitamin C. Additionally, in patients with vitreous hemorrhage-induced symptomatic ocular floaters, taking 3 capsules daily of the same mixed fruit enzyme product for 3 months leads to 56% of floaters completely disappearing and improves visual acuity when compared to baseline, as well as significant improvements when compared with vitamin C (111650). It is unclear if these effects are due to papain, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Pressure ulcers. Although there has been interest in using topical papain for pressure ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of papain for this purpose.
• Radiation dermatitis. Oral papain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: One small clinical study in patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy shows that taking three capsules of a specific combination product (Wobe-Mugos E, Mucos Pharma) containing papain 100 mg, trypsin 40 mg, and chymotrypsin 40 mg per capsule, four times daily, beginning 3 days prior to radiotherapy and continuing until the last day of therapy, does not attenuate skin deterioration when compared with placebo (67834). However, another small, open-label clinical study in patients with uterine carcinoma shows that taking three capsules of the same combination product four times daily, beginning 7 days before radiotherapy and continuing for 9 weeks, reduces skin reactions when compared with control (67831). It is unclear if these findings are due to papain, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Radiation-induced cystitis. Oral papain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with uterine carcinoma receiving radiotherapy shows that taking three capsules of a specific combination product (Wobe-Mugos E, Mucos Pharma) containing papain 100 mg, trypsin 40 mg, and chymotrypsin 40 mg per capsule, four times daily, beginning 7 days before radiotherapy and continuing for 9 weeks, reduces genitourinary symptoms when compared with control (67831).
• Radiation-induced nausea and vomiting. Oral papain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy shows that taking three capsules of a specific combination product (Wobe-Mugos E, Mucos Pharma), containing papain 100 mg, trypsin 40 mg, and chymotrypsin 40 mg per capsule, four times daily, beginning 3 days prior to radiotherapy and continuing until the last day of therapy, does not reduce radiation-related nausea or vomiting when compared with placebo (67834).
• Tonsillopharyngitis. Oral papain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: Two small clinical studies in patients with pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis shows that use of throat lozenges containing papain 2 mg, lysozyme 5 mg, and bacitracin 200 IU daily for 4 days reduces pain and inflammation of the throat and lymph nodes when compared with placebo or disinfectant alone (964,968). It is unclear if these findings are due to papain, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Traumatic oral ulcers. Although there has been interest in using topical papain for traumatic oral ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of papain for this purpose.
• Venous leg ulcers. Although there has been interest in using topical papain for venous leg ulcers, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of papain for this purpose.
• Wound healing. Topical papain has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A small clinical study in patients with purulent wounds shows that applying papain 1% solution plus dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) followed by phonophoresis, a process by which ultrasound is used to increase topical drug delivery, improves wound healing when compared to baseline (67843). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group. Also, it is unclear if these findings are due to papain, DMSO, or the combination. More evidence is needed to rate papain for these uses.

(Read more about PAPAIN)

INSUFFICIENT RELIABLE EVIDENCE to RATE

• Aging skin. Although there is interest in using oral fermented papaya for aging skin, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of papaya for this purpose.
• Androgenic alopecia. Papaya has only been evaluated in combination with other ingredients for androgenic alopecia; its effect when used alone is unclear. Details: A clinical study in adults with androgenic and diffuse alopecia shows that applying fermented papaya 2% hair lotion also containing fermented mangosteen and caffeine on the scalp daily plus fermented papaya 0.5% shampoo also containing fermented mangosteen on the scalp 3 times weekly for 14 weeks shows improvement in hair loss intensity and the quality of hair shaft compared to baseline (111719). It is unclear if the effect is due to the fermented papaya, other ingredients, or the combination.
• Colorectal cancer. It is unclear if oral papaya fruit prevents colorectal cancer. Details: One small observational study in adults living in Thailand has found that papaya fruit consumption is associated with a 42% lower odds of developing colorectal cancer (67941).
• Dengue fever. Small clinical studies suggest that oral papaya leaf extract might increase platelet counts in patients with dengue fever. Details: A meta-analysis of mostly small clinical studies in adults with dengue fever shows that taking papaya leaf extract reduces the duration of hospital stay by about 2 days and improves mean platelet count over the next five days by about 35 x 10⁹ when compared with standard treatment. The most common dosing ranged from 500 mg to 3300 mg daily for five days in divided doses (102799). This finding is limited by imprecision and high risk of bias. One additional small clinical study in patients with severe thrombocytopenia due to dengue fever shows that taking a papaya leaf extract (Caripill, Micro Labs) 1100 mg three times daily for 5 days increases platelet counts by a greater amount through day 3 when compared with placebo, and reduces the median time to platelet recovery by one day (102800).
• Diabetes. It is unclear if oral fermented papaya improves glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Details: A small clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes shows that consuming fermented papaya fruit 3 grams once daily for 2 months reduces fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels by 13% and 10%, respectively, when compared to baseline (67902). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of a comparator group.
• Gallbladder cancer. It is unclear if oral fermented papaya prevents gallbladder cancer. Details: One small observational study in adults living in Thailand has found that eating papaya fruit is associated with a 66% lower odds of developing gallbladder cancer (67871).
• Gingivitis. It is unclear if using toothpaste and/or mouthwash containing fermented papaya leaf extract improves symptoms of gingivitis. Details: Preliminary clinical research in adults with good oral hygiene shows that brushing teeth twice daily with a toothpaste containing papaya leaf extract for 4 weeks, with or without the use of a papaya leaf extract-containing mouthwash, decreases gingival bleeding when compared to baseline. However, using this toothpaste with or without the mouthwash is no better than using a sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS)-free, enzyme-containing toothpaste, with or without an essential oil mouthwash (99861).
• Human papillomavirus (HPV). It is unclear if oral papaya fruit prevents persistent HPV infection. Details: A small population study in females infected with HPV has found that consuming papaya fruit at least once weekly is associated with 70% lower odds of persistent HPV infection when compared with never eating papaya fruit (67881).
• Intestinal parasite infection. Although there is interest in using oral papaya for intestinal parasite infection, there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of papaya for this condition.
• Periodontitis. It is unclear if applying fermented papaya gel into gingival pockets is beneficial for periodontitis. Details: One small open-label clinical study in adults with moderate to severe periodontitis shows that, when used in addition to standard treatment, applying fermented papaya gel (Carica Co.) 7 grams into intragingival pockets for 15 minutes daily for 10 days seems to improve bleeding, plaque, and gingivitis after 7-45 days when compared with standard treatment alone (93090). The validity of this finding is limited by the lack of blinding.
• Thrombocytopenia. Although there is interest in using oral papaya leaf extract for immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), there is insufficient reliable information about the clinical effects of papaya for this condition.
• Wound healing. It is unclear if topical papaya fruit gel is beneficial for wound healing. Details: A small open-label clinical study in patients with post-caesarean section wound gape shows that applying a wound dressing containing partially ripe papaya fruit 200 grams to the edges of a gaped wound for 48 hours, and re-applying as needed, seems to modestly speed up the development of granulation tissue and reduce the duration of hospitalization when compared with using hydrogen peroxide dressings, changed daily (93091). The validity of this finding is limited because the control treatment with hydrogen peroxide may cause skin damage and slow wound healing. More evidence is needed to rate papaya for these uses.

(Read more about PAPAYA)

Proteolytic enzymes represent a wide group of enzymes that are used alone or in combination. See specific monographs for effectiveness information.

(Read more about PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES))

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Doses up to 240 mg daily have been used safely for up to a year (6252,6253,10622,11457,18281,18284,91104,91105,91106,91111)(96449,103298). Higher doses up to 3200 mg daily have been used safely, short-term (18283,110546). ...when used topically and appropriately. Bromelain has been used safely as a debriding agent for up to 4 hours (18275,91113,103297,108148,108149,113899). Additionally, a retrospective cohort study in critically ill patients with severe burns suggests that use of bromelain as a debriding agent for up to 4 hours is not associated with a greater risk of bacteremia (113899).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about BROMELAIN)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally or intravenously and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (7555,12928,12946,95817). However, excessive doses should be avoided. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: Age 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51+ years, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stone, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Other clinical studies suggest that, when combined with vitamin D supplementation, calcium supplementation is not associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Other analyses report conflicting results and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day, to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484), and to combine calcium supplementation with vitamin D supplementation (93533).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in excessive doses. The National Academy of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 19-50 years, 2500 mg; 51 years and older, 2000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome. There has also been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these studies, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Other clinical studies suggest that, when combined with vitamin D supplementation, calcium supplementation is not associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Other analyses report conflicting results and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Advise patients to not consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg per day, to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484), and to combine calcium supplementation with vitamin D supplementation (93533).

CHILDREN: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately. Calcium is safe when used in appropriate doses (17506).

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age as follows: 0-6 months, 1000 mg; 6-12 months, 1500 mg; 1-8 years, 2500 mg; 9-18 years, 3000 mg (17506). Doses over these levels can increase the risk of side effects such as kidney stones, hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and milk-alkali syndrome.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when used orally and appropriately (945,1586,3263,3264,17506). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prescribing oral calcium supplementation 1.5-2 grams daily during pregnancy to those with low dietary calcium intake to prevent pre-eclampsia (97347).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally in excessive doses. The Institute of Medicine sets the same daily tolerable upper intake level (UL) for calcium according to age independent of pregnancy status: 9-18 years, 3000 mg; 19-50 years, 2500 mg (17506). Doses over these amounts might increase the risk of neonatal hypocalcemia-induced seizures possibly caused by transient neonatal hypoparathyroidism in the setting of excessive calcium supplementation during pregnancy, especially during the third trimester. Neonatal hypocalcemia is a risk factor for neonatal seizures (97345).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

LIKELY SAFE ...when consumed in the amounts found in foods. Chlorophyllin is permitted for use as a coloring agent in limited quantities in foods (5630).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally, short-term. Chlorophyllin has been used with apparent safety at a dose of up to 300 mg daily for up to 3 months (1321,1323,41847,41839,101244). There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of chlorophyllin when used orally, long-term. Most chlorophyllin supplements contain copper in concentrations of around 4%, or 4 mg copper per 100 mg chlorophyllin (105553). The tolerable upper intake level for copper in adults is 10 mg daily, with an average dietary intake in the United States of approximately 1-1.5 mg daily. Long-term consumption of high levels of copper can lead to serious adverse effects (7135). The bioavailability of copper from chlorophyllin is unclear; until more is known, use with caution. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of chlorophyllin when used topically.

CHILDREN:
There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of chlorophyllin in children. However, most chlorophyllin supplements contain copper in concentrations of around 4%, or 4 mg copper per 100 mg chlorophyllin (105553). The tolerable upper intake level (UL) for copper by age is 1 mg daily for children 1-3 years, 3 mg daily for children 4-8 years, 5 mg daily for children 9-13 years, and 8 mg daily for adolescents (7135). The bioavailability of copper from chlorophyllin is unclear; until more is known, use with caution.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about CHLOROPHYLLIN)

There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of lipase.

CHILDREN: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase (rhBSSL) is used orally by premature infants. Adding rhBSSL to infant formula or pasteurized breast milk increases the risk for serious gastrointestinal adverse effects in premature infants (101940).

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about LIPASE)

LIKELY SAFE ...when used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Papain has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately for medicinal purposes, short-term. Papain has been used in combination with other proteolytic enzymes at a dose of up to 1200 mg daily for up to 9 weeks (964,965,968,67831,67834). ...when used topically as a diluted solution in appropriate doses for up to 20 minutes (67835,67843,67845).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when used orally in large amounts. In excessive doses, papain can cause significant side effects including esophageal perforation (6). ...when raw papain is used topically. Raw papain or papaya latex is a severe irritant and vesicant (6).

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when used orally. There is some concern that crude papain is teratogenic and embryotoxic (6).

LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about PAPAIN)

LIKELY SAFE ...when the ripe fruit is used orally in amounts commonly found in foods. Papaya has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the US (4912).

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when the leaf extract is used orally and appropriately in medicinal amounts, short term. The leaf extract has been used with apparent safety in doses of up to 3300 mg daily for up to 5 days (102799,102800). ...when the ripe fruit is used topically and appropriately, short term. The fruit has been applied with apparent safety to the gingiva or skin for up to 10 days (93090,93091).

POSSIBLY UNSAFE ...when the unripe fruit containing papaya latex and raw papain is used orally. Raw papain has been reported to cause esophageal perforation (6,93083). ...when papaya latex is used topically. Papaya latex, which contains raw papain, is a severe irritant and vesicant (6).

PREGNANCY: LIKELY SAFE
when the ripe fruit is consumed in amounts commonly found in foods.

PREGNANCY: POSSIBLY UNSAFE
when the unripe fruit containing papaya latex is used orally; avoid using. There is some concern that crude papain, a constituent of papaya latex, is teratogenic and embryotoxic (6); however, this might be due to extraneous substances rather than papain (11). Some evidence also suggests that high doses of papaya seed extract have abortifacient activity and can adversely affect fetal development (67870). Theoretically, eating large amounts of papaya seeds may have similar effects.

LACTATION: LIKELY SAFE
when the ripe fruit is consumed in amounts commonly found in foods. There is insufficient reliable information available about the safety of using papaya medicinally; avoid using.

(Read more about PAPAYA)

POSSIBLY SAFE ...when used orally and appropriately. Various proteolytic enzymes have been safely used orally in clinical research (716,964,965,968,969,6252,6253,10622,11457,18281,18284) (91104,91105,91106,91111,96449). Side effects are typically mild to moderate and most often include gastrointestinal effects. See specific monographs for more detailed information related to the safety of individual proteolytic enzymes. ...when used topically and appropriately. Various proteolytic enzymes have been safely used topically in clinical research (67835,67843,67845,91113). Some proteolytic enzymes might cause allergic reactions when used topically. See specific monographs for more detailed information related to the safety of individual proteolytic enzymes.

PREGNANCY AND LACTATION:
Insufficient reliable information available; avoid using.

(Read more about PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES))

ANTICOAGULANT/ANTIPLATELET DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Bromelain may have antiplatelet effects and may increase the risk of bleeding if used with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.  Details There is one case report of a patient experiencing minor bruising while taking bromelain with naproxen (14806). Bromelain is thought to have antiplatelet activity (10639,14806,18285,18286,37234). Whether this interaction is of concern with topical bromelain is unclear. Interference with coagulation of burn wounds has been reported in a patient receiving bromelain-based enzymatic debridement. However, observational research has found that topical bromelain debridement is not associated with increases or decreases in laboratory markers of coagulation when compared with surgical debridement (110547).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Mild •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, bromelain might increase levels of tetracycline antibiotics.  Details Laboratory research suggests that bromelain might increase the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics. However, a study in healthy adults reported no difference in tetracycline plasma levels when a 500 mg dose was taken with or without bromelain 80 mg (14296).

(Read more about BROMELAIN)

ALUMINUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium citrate might increase aluminum absorption and toxicity. Other types of calcium do not increase aluminum absorption.  Details Calcium citrate can increase the absorption of aluminum when taken with aluminum hydroxide. The increase in aluminum levels may become toxic, particularly in individuals with kidney disease (21631). However, the effect of calcium citrate on aluminum absorption is due to the citrate anion rather than calcium cation. Calcium acetate does not appear to increase aluminum absorption (93006).

BISPHOSPHONATES Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium reduces the absorption of bisphosphonates.  Details Advise patients to take bisphosphonates at least 30 minutes before calcium, but preferably at a different time of day. Calcium supplements decrease absorption of bisphosphonates (12937).

CALCIPOTRIENE (Dovonex) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Taking calcipotriene with calcium might increase the risk for hypercalcemia.  Details Calcipotriene is a vitamin D analog used topically for psoriasis. It can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to cause systemic effects, including hypercalcemia (12938). Theoretically, combining calcipotriene with calcium supplements might increase the risk of hypercalcemia.

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Interaction Rating = Minor Be watchful with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Unlikely •  Level of Evidence = D Intravenous calcium may decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers; oral calcium is unlikely to have this effect.  Details Intravenous calcium is used to decrease the effects of calcium channel blockers in the management of overdose. Intravenous calcium gluconate has been used before intravenous verapamil (Isoptin) to prevent or reduce the hypotensive effects without affecting the antiarrhythmic effects (6124). But there is no evidence that dietary or supplemental calcium when taken orally interacts with calcium channel blockers (12939,12947).

CEFTRIAXONE (Rocephin) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Co-administration of intravenous calcium and ceftriaxone can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys.  Details Avoid administering intravenous calcium in any form, such as parenteral nutrition or Lactated Ringers, within 48 hours of intravenous ceftriaxone. Case reports in neonates show that administering intravenous ceftriaxone and calcium can result in precipitation of a ceftriaxone-calcium salt in the lungs and kidneys. In several cases, neonates have died as a result of this interaction (15794,21632). So far there are no reports in adults; however, there is still concern that this interaction might occur in adults.

DIGOXIN (Lanoxin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Using intravenous calcium with digoxin might increase the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias.  Details Hypercalcemia increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with digoxin (12940). However, one retrospective analysis of clinical data suggests that intravenous calcium does not increase the risk of dysrhythmias or mortality in patients receiving digoxin (38960).

DILTIAZEM (Cardizem, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of diltiazem.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, calcium might increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of diltiazem.

DOLUTEGRAVIR (Tivicay) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of dolutegravir.  Details Advise patients to take dolutegravir either 2 hours before or 6 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium carbonate 1200 mg concomitantly with dolutegravir 50 mg reduces plasma levels of dolutegravir by almost 40%. Calcium appears to decrease levels of dolutegravir through chelation (93578).

ELVITEGRAVIR (Vitekta) Interaction Rating = Major Do not take this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce levels of elvitegravir.  Details Advise patients to take elvitegravir either 2 hours before or 2 hours after taking calcium supplements. Pharmacokinetic research suggests that taking calcium along with elvitegravir can reduce blood levels of elvitegravir through chelation (94166).

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption and effectiveness of levothyroxine.  Details Advise patients to take levothyroxine and calcium supplements at least 4 hours apart. Calcium reduces levothyroxine absorption, probably by forming insoluble complexes (5082). Calcium carbonate supplements reduce effectiveness of levothyroxine in patients with hypothyroidism (5081,5082,6137).

LITHIUM Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use of calcium and lithium may increase this risk of hypercalcemia.  Details Clinical research suggests that long-term use of lithium may cause hypercalcemia in 10% to 60% of patients (38953). Theoretically, concomitant use of lithium and calcium supplements may further increase this risk.

QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of quinolone antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral quinolones at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements or calcium-fortified foods. Taking calcium at the same time as oral quinolones can reduce quinolone absorption. Calcium binds to quinolones in the gut (4412,10339,21638,38570).

RALTEGRAVIR (Isentress) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium may reduce levels of raltegravir.  Details Pharmacokinetic research shows that taking a single dose of calcium carbonate 3000 mg along with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily modestly decreases the mean area under the curve of raltegravir, but the decrease does not necessitate a dose adjustment of raltegravir (94164). However, a case of elevated HIV-1 RNA levels and documented resistance to raltegravir has been reported for a patient taking calcium carbonate 1 gram three times daily plus vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 400 IU three times daily in combination with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 11 months. It is thought that calcium reduced raltegravir levels by chelation, leading to treatment failure (94165).

SOTALOL (Betapace) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = B Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of sotalol.  Details Advise patients to separate doses by at least 2 hours before or 4-6 hours after calcium. Calcium appears to reduce the absorption of sotalol, probably by forming insoluble complexes (10018).

TETRACYCLINE ANTIBIOTICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Calcium seems to reduce the absorption of tetracycline antibiotics.  Details Advise patients to take oral tetracyclines at least 2 hours before, or 4-6 hours after calcium supplements. Taking calcium at the same time as oral tetracyclines can reduce tetracycline absorption. Calcium binds to tetracyclines in the gut (1843).

THIAZIDE DIURETICS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = C Taking calcium along with thiazides might increase the risk of hypercalcemia and renal failure.  Details Thiazides reduce calcium excretion by the kidneys (1902). Using thiazides along with moderately large amounts of calcium carbonate increases the risk of milk-alkali syndrome (hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis, renal failure). Patients may need to have their serum calcium levels and/or parathyroid function monitored regularly.

VERAPAMIL (Calan, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, calcium may reduce the therapeutic effects of verapamil.  Details Hypercalcemia can reduce the effectiveness of verapamil in atrial fibrillation (10574). Theoretically, use of calcium supplements may increase this risk of hypercalcemia and reduce the effectiveness of verapamil.

(Read more about CALCIUM)

PHOTOSENSITIZING DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Theoretically, concomitant use of chlorophyllin with photosensitizing drugs may have additive effects.  Details Chlorophyllin is a semi-synthetic derivative of chlorophyll. Chlorophyll has been reported to cause photosensitization (1326). Orally, chlorophyll has also been associated with the development of pseudoporphyria in multiple case reports (93892,97933).

(Read more about CHLOROPHYLLIN)

(Read more about LIPASE)

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, papain might increase the effects and side effects of warfarin.  Details In one case report, a patient previously stable on warfarin was found to have an international normalization ratio (INR) of 7.4, which was attributed to ingestion of a supplement containing papain from papaya extract (613).

(Read more about PAPAIN)

AMIODARONE (Cordarone) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, papaya extract may increase the levels and clinical effects of amiodarone.  Details Animal research in rats shows that a single oral dose of papaya extract, as well as multiple doses of papaya extract daily over 14 days, prior to a single dose of amiodarone delays the time to maximum amiodarone concentration. However, only the 14-day papaya extract regimen increases systemic amiodarone exposure by 60% to 70% (93093). This interaction has not been reported in humans.

ANTIDIABETES DRUGS Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Probable •  Level of Evidence = B Concomitant use of antidiabetic drugs with fermented papaya can produce additive effects. It is unclear if other forms of papaya have the same effect.  Details A small low-quality clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes who are taking glibenclamide shows that taking a fermented papaya preparation 3 grams daily for 2 months decreases fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels when compared to baseline. Additionally, of the 25 patients in the study, 9 required a reduction in glibenclamide dose (67902).

LEVOTHYROXINE (Synthroid, others) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = Moderate •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, consuming large quantities of papaya fruit can reduce the clinical effects of levothyroxine.  Details In one case-report, a 37-year-old male with a history of thyroidectomy who was stabilized on levothyroxine for 5 years presented with hypothyroidism after consuming 5-6 papaya fruits daily for 14 days during vacation. In a controlled re-challenge test involving 5-6 papayas daily, the patient remained euthyroid for 7 days, but developed mild hypothyroidism after 14 days. Both times, thyroid levels normalized 40-45 days after discontinuing papaya (93087).

WARFARIN (Coumadin) Interaction Rating = Moderate Be cautious with this combination. Severity = High •  Occurrence = Possible •  Level of Evidence = D Theoretically, concomitant use of warfarin with papain-containing papaya extract might increase the effects and side effects of warfarin.  Details In one case report, a patient previously stable on warfarin was found to have an international normalization ratio (INR) of 7.4, which was attributed to ingestion of a supplement containing papain from papaya extract (613).

(Read more about PAPAYA)

(Read more about PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES))

General ...Orally, bromelain seems to be well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Diarrhea, flatulence, gastric upset, headache.
Topically: Pruritus, urticaria.

Dermatologic ...Topically, bromelain may cause dermal allergic reactions including urticaria, pruritus, and skin swelling (9184). Redness, swelling, burning, pain at the application site, and cellulitis have also been reported rarely (108148,113513). In one case, a fixed drug eruption with pruritis near the groin was reported in a 33-year-old male taking bromelain 50 mg orally daily for 10 days. After discontinuation of bromelain and treatment with topical corticosteroid, the lesion resolved. Upon re-challenge with bromelain, the lesion reappeared in the same area (103300).
In another case report, a 61-year-old male with a history of chronic lower leg ulceration secondary to chronic venous hypertension and recurrent deep vein thrombosis on rivaroxaban presented with a deep-dermal burn on his lower calf. Bromelain-based topical enzymatic debridement agent Nexobrid 2 grams was applied to the burn site. Thirty minutes later, the patient experienced two instances of hemorrhage at the site of debridement. The patient was stabilized and treated with fluids, packed red cells, and tranexamic acid, and then the Nexobrid was removed (111656). Caution should be used in patients with underlying coagulopathies.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, bromelain may cause gastrointestinal disturbances, including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, flatulence, and abdominal pain (9184,18274,18282,96216,113513).

Immunologic ...Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic reactions to bromelain may occur (9184).
If inhaled, bromelain may cause sensitization and allergic reactions such as asthma (37199,37215,37233). In case reports of occupational inhalation of bromelain, additional allergic symptoms included difficulty swallowing, throat itching, eye irritation, and rhinitis (37214).

(Read more about BROMELAIN)

General ...Orally and intravenously, calcium is well-tolerated when used appropriately.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Belching, constipation, diarrhea, flatulence, and stomach upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Case reports have raised concerns about calciphylaxis and kidney stones.

Cardiovascular ...There has been concern that calcium intake may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD), including myocardial infarction (MI). Some clinical research suggests that calcium intake, often in amounts over the recommended daily intake level of 1000-1300 mg daily for adults, is associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, and MI (16118,17482,91350,107233). However, these results, particularly meta-analyses, have been criticized for excluding trials in which calcium was administered with vitamin D (94137). Many of these trials also only included postmenopausal females. Other analyses report conflicting results, and have not shown that calcium intake affects the risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (92994,93533,97308,107231). Reasons for these discrepancies are not entirely clear. It may relate to whether calcium is taken as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin D. When taken with vitamin D, which is commonly recommended, calcium supplementation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD, or MI (93533,107231). Also, the association between calcium supplementation and CVD, CHD, or MI risk may be influenced by the amount of calcium consumed as part of the diet. Supplementation with calcium may be associated with an increased risk of MI in people with dietary calcium intake above 805 mg daily, but not in those with dietary calcium intake below 805 mg daily (17482). To minimize the possible risk of CVD, CHD, or MI, advise patients not to consume more than the recommended daily intake of 1000-1200 mg and to consider total calcium intake from both dietary and supplemental sources (17484). While dietary intake of calcium is preferred over supplemental intake, advise patients who require calcium supplements to take calcium along with vitamin D, as this combination does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of MI (93533).
Rarely, calcium intake can increase the risk of calciphylaxis, which usually occurs in patients with kidney failure. Calciphylaxis is the deposition of calcium phosphate in arterioles, which causes skin ulcers and skin necrosis. In a case report, a 64-year-old female with a history of neck fracture, sepsis, and ischemic colitis presented with painful leg ulcers due to calciphylaxis. She discontinued calcium and vitamin D supplementation and was treated with sodium thiosulfate and supportive care (95816).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, calcium can cause belching, flatulence, nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, and diarrhea (1824,1843,12950,38803). Although constipation is frequently cited as an adverse effect of calcium, there is no scientific substantiation of this side effect (1824,1843,1844,1845,12950,38978). Calcium carbonate has been reported to cause acid rebound, but this is controversial (12935,12936).

Oncologic ...There is some concern that very high doses of calcium might increase the risk of prostate cancer. Some epidemiological evidence suggests that consuming over 2000 mg/day of dietary calcium might increase the risk for prostate cancer (4825,12949). Additional research suggests that calcium intake over 1500 mg/day might increase the risk of advanced prostate cancer and prostate cancer mortality (14132). Consumption of dairy products has also been weakly linked to a small increase in prostate cancer risk (98894). However, contradictory research suggests no association between dietary intake of calcium and overall prostate cancer risk (14131,14132,104630). More evidence is needed to determine the effect of calcium, if any, on prostate cancer risk.

Renal ...Kidney stones have been reported in individuals taking calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily in combination with vitamin D 2000 IU daily for 4 years (93943).

(Read more about CALCIUM)

General ...Orally, chlorophyllin seems to be well tolerated when used for up to 3 months. However, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.

Dermatologic ...Since chlorophyllin is a semi-synthetic derivative of chlorophyll, there is some concern that it could cause similar adverse effects. Topically, chlorophyll cream has been reported to cause dermatitis (41912). Orally, chlorophyll can cause photosensitization (1326). In case reports, oral consumption of chlorophyll has been associated with the development of pseudoporphyria. Two females developed easily traumatized blisters on their hands after consumption of a Swisse Chlorophyll drink (93892). In one case series, four males developed skin blisters and skin erosions after taking oral chlorophyll 100-1200 mg daily for 6.5 months up to 7 years. Resolution of symptoms was delayed for 2-8 months after chlorophyll discontinuation (97933). To date, chlorophyllin has not been reported to cause similar adverse effects; however, in vitro toxicology research suggests that chlorophyllin is phototoxic (101235).

(Read more about CHLOROPHYLLIN)

General ...No adverse effects have been reported in adults. However, a thorough evaluation of safety outcomes has not been conducted.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as necrotizing enterocolitis, when recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase is used in premature infants.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, when added to the formula or pasteurized breast milk consumed by premature infants, recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase (rhBSSL) can cause gastrointestinal adverse effects, including abdominal distension, flatulence, constipation, colic, abdominal pain, gastroenteritis, vomiting, regurgitation, and rectal bleeding (101940). Premature infants receiving rhBSSL also had a slightly higher rate of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) when compared with those receiving placebo. After review by a panel of experts, it was determined that the rate of confirmed or suspected NEC in infants consuming rhBSSL was 3.3%, compared with 0.5% in those receiving placebo. Although this rate of NEC is lower than the historical rate of occurrence in premature infants (11%), a possible increased risk for NEC cannot be ruled out (101940).

(Read more about LIPASE)

General ...Orally and topically, papain seems to be well tolerated when used short-term at appropriate doses. Taking high oral doses may be unsafe.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Allergic reactions in sensitive individuals.
Topically: Urticaria and pruritus in sensitive individuals.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Esophageal perforation and severe gastritis with high doses.

Dermatologic ...Topically, papain can cause itching (966). Urticarial reactions and itching have been reported in people occupationally exposed to papain, with papain confirmed as the causative agent by skin prick tests or radioallergosorbent tests (RAST) (95533,95534). In a randomized controlled trial assessing the effects of papain, trypsin, and chymotrypsin on adverse effects from radiotherapy, moderate to severe epitheliolysis was more frequent in the enzyme-treated group than the placebo group (67834). It is unclear if this adverse effect is due to papain, other enzymes, or the combination.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, papain has been associated with diarrhea. In a randomized controlled trial assessing the effects of papain, trypsin, and chymotrypsin on adverse effects from radiotherapy, moderate to severe diarrhea was more frequent in the enzyme-treated group than the placebo group (67834). However, it is unclear if this adverse effect is due to papain, other enzymes, or the combination. Papain has also been associated with gastric ulcers and esophageal perforation in case reports of phytobezoars treated with papain (67848). In general, large amounts of papain can cause esophageal perforation (6). Ingestion of papaya latex (raw papain) can cause severe gastritis.

Genitourinary ...Orally, papain has been associated with hypernatremia in case reports of phytobezoars treated with papain (67848).

Immunologic ...Orally, papain may cause allergic reactions, including itchy watery eyes, runny nose, sneezing, abdominal cramps, sweating, and diarrhea, in individuals sensitive to papain (6,967). Occupational exposure to airborne papain dust may also cause respiratory allergic reactions (95532,95533,95534,95535,95536).

Pulmonary/Respiratory ...Occupational exposure to airborne papain dust may cause respiratory allergic reactions. Symptoms include rhinitis, sneezing, conjunctivitis, dyspnea, wheezing, cough, and asthma. In most cases, papain is confirmed as the causative agent by skin prick tests, radioallergosorbent tests (RAST), or detection of papain-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) and IgG (95532,95533,95534,95535,95536).

(Read more about PAPAIN)

General ...Orally, papaya fruit is well tolerated when consumed in food amounts. Papaya leaf extract seems to be generally well tolerated.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Nausea and vomiting from papaya leaf extract.
Topically: Burning sensation from unripe papaya.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Orally: Severe allergic reactions.

Dermatologic ...Orally, high doses of papaya might cause yellow skin discoloration. A case of carotenemia has been reported for a 42-year-old female who consumed 1.5-2 papayas daily for 6 months. The condition resolved when she stopped eating papayas (67929).
Topically, unripe papaya fruit may cause occasional burning sensation when applied to skin ulcers (67856).

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, the leaf extract has been reported to cause nausea and vomiting in clinical research (102799). A case of esophageal perforation has been reported for a previously healthy 27-year-old female who used papain, a constituent of papaya latex, to digest a piece of meat stuck in her esophagus (93083).

Immunologic ...Orally, papain, a constituent of raw, unripe papaya, has been reported to cause allergic reactions in sensitive individuals, including itchy watery eyes, runny nose, sneezing, abdominal cramps, sweating, and diarrhea (6,967). Papaya may also cause hypersensitivity reactions such as systemic contact dermatitis, which occur more commonly in people who are allergic to latex (6197,7853,57635). A case of systemic contact dermatitis has been reported for a 55-year-old female with no prior history of atopic disease or drug allergy after ingesting a throat lozenge containing papaya juice (67942).

Other ...In regions with arsenic-contaminated soil, papaya fruits contain a higher mean concentration of arsenic compared with many other forms of vegetation grown in the regions. Eating papaya from these regions is thought to contribute to higher dietary levels of arsenic (32461,67879).

(Read more about PAPAYA)

General ...Orally, proteolytic enzymes are generally well tolerated. See specific monographs for detailed safety information related to individual proteolytic enzymes.
Most Common Adverse Effects:
Orally: Gastrointestinal upset.
Serious Adverse Effects (Rare):
Topically: Allergic reactions.

Gastrointestinal ...Orally, some patients taking proteolytic enzymes may have gastrointestinal complaints (101517).

Immunologic ...Proteolytic enzymes are commonly found in laundry detergents and pre-spotter products. Rarely, protease specific IgE positive tests possibly related to these products have occurred. Exposure may be airborne or topical (102705). In addition, in case reports, occupational exposure to the airborne proteolytic enzyme pepsin has resulted in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis or asthma (102706,102707).

(Read more about PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES))